Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-10-28-Agenda Packet-PC-HPC o THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION October 28, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER OPledge of Allegiance Roll Call Chairman Wimberly_ Vice Chairman Oaxaca Munoz Macias Fletcher rF� II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. FIF� III. ANNOUNCEMENTS AND PRESENTATIONS OA. Presentation of a Resolution of Commendation for Betty Miller, Associate Engineer. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CHO October 28, 2015 Coxcn Page 2 IV. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION B. Consideration of Regular Meeting Minutes dated September 9, 2015. C. Consideration of Workshop Minutes dated September 9, 2015. D. Consideration of Workshop Minutes dated September 23, 2015. L:-V. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION E. WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA AREA. VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS/ PLANNING COMMISSION F. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960 —WILSON ESTATES, LLC - The subdivision of 4.36 acres into 12 residential lots in the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court;APN: 1087-261-12. Related Files: Design Review DRC2015-00811. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32(CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in-fill development. EVII. COMMISSION BUSINESS/HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION G. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES H. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS VIII. ADJOURNMENT O 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 21,2015,at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view.. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us. O VicinityMap Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting October 28 , 2015 J : E :2 d L i L = a = _ Q s � 4 ` U I s c td a� t 19th St Base Line Base Line J t Church Church Foothill! . Foothill N � c Arrow E �' `� Arrow c z J rsey 8th oC w i 'o >> H c —�— 6th W L d 4th � a = -- � – 14th �r Meeting Location: City Hall/Council Chambers Ec 10500 Civic Center Drive Items A: Presentation of a Resolution of Commendation for Betty Miller, Associate Engineer. Items B ,C & D: Approval of Meeting Minutes dated September 9, 2015 and September 23, 2015. Items E: Winery Theme Architecture in the Rancho Cucamonga Area. Items F: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960 -WILSON ESTATES, LLC. s THE CITY OF ]RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND THE PLANNING COMMISSION September 9, 2015 - 7:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center . COUNCIL CHAMBERS 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER • Pledge of Allegiance TOOPM Roll Call Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Macias X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director;Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place.for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Item B -1 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO September 9, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 2 III. CONSENT CALENDAR/HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION A. Consideration of Regular Meeting Minutes dated August 12, 2015. B. Consideration of Workshop Minutes dated August 12, 2015. C. VACATION OF A PORTION OF HELLMAN AVENUE, LOCATED SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD (V-228)— ERIN MADISON, INC. —A REQUEST TO VACATE A PORTION OF HELLMAN AVENUE, LOCATED SOUTH OF FERON BOULEVARD—APN: 0209-032- 57 RELATED FILE: DRC2014-00745. Moved by Fletcher seconded by Munoz carried 5-0 to adopt the Consent Calendar as presented. IV. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS/PLANNING COMMISSION D. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. 15-66 EXPRESSING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S SUPPORT OF MEASURE A, THE WEST-SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS AND STREET LIGHTING MEASURE, TO BE ON THE NOVEMBER 3, 2015 ELECTION BALLOT. Presentation by Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst (copy of PowerPoint on file). in response to Commissioner Macias, Mr. Villenas explained there is no "sunset"to Measure A. He further explained the 3% "escalator"and noted that it is not automatic nor a yearly increase, it is triggered only if needed meaning the actual costs to maintain the parks and lighting exceeds the assessment. In response to Commissioner Fletcher, he explained that 30% of the budget is used for contract services and internal crews that do repair and maintenance are used as well. He also said the essential shortfall in funding is a little over a million dollars. He noted the oversight community group has no actual authority but are advisory, they will have the opportunity to review the budget and offer input and make recommendations but they have no authority to give staff direction. Commissioner Macias expressed his concern that there is a perception about a lack of transparency. He added that the City has other districts and assessments in place. He said the City needs to justify the escalator and demonstrate that other areas of the city have had the same issue and it was dealt with. Commissioner Fletcher said that with respect to the 3%escalator, the comments from the public that are opposed to the measure believe there will be an automatic annual escalator and they believe this overrides their right to vote on increases. He noted there is still some Item B —2 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION T' AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO September 9, 2015 CucaMovca Page 3 confusion out there and perhaps it has not been adequately explained. Mr. Villenas said the comments are well taken. Commissioner Fletcher said he believes this is a needed expense and he is in support-he has no problem with the fees to keep these parks in good condition for the residents. Commissioner Munoz reported the concerns he heard about the 3%increase may just be a public relations issue that needs to be better explained. He said the driver in the existing funding is inadequate and the City did due diligence to find cost savings. Commissioner Oaxaca echoed both commissioners. He noted that in Etiwanda most homeowners did not even know they were paying an assessment until it was brought to their attention. He suggested we be clear about the role of the oversight committee and budget review as the public needs to understand where that decision rests. He said in Etiwanda it was important that people knew exactly what the funds took care of and give • them the big picture. Chairman Wimberly agreed with all the prior comments. He said transparency of what is happening and what the triggers are for the escalator and who will decide when the trigger is pulled is important information. Chairman Wimberly offered to open the floor for public comment and seeing and hearing none, closed the comment period. Moved by Macias seconded by Munoz carried 5-0 to approve the resolution supporting Measure A. V. COMMISSION BUSINESSMISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PLANNING COMMISSION E. INTER-AGENCY UPDATES None F. COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS None • VI. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission immediately adjourned at 7:28 pm to the Rains Room to discuss Pre-Application Review DRC2015-00466-Oakmont of Rancho Cucamonga. Item B -3 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO September 9, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 4 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 3, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others,the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking,please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's Item B —4 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES RANCHO September 9, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 5 decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,533 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us. • • Item B —5 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP OF RANCHO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CUCAMONGA MINUTES September 9, 2015 — 7:00 p.m. Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 7:40 PM Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz X Macias X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Dan James, Senior Civil Engineer;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary;Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist Rob Ball, Fire Marshall; Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner,Mike Smith, Associate Planner U. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please j refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION • A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00466 — OAKMONT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA-A request for a Planning Commission Workshop review of a conceptual Item C—1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RANCHO SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 2 site plan for a facility that provides independent, assisted living, and memory care housing on a vacant parcel of 3.21 acres within the Mixed Use (MU) District located at Haven Avenue and Church Street - APN: 1077-881-13. Nikki Cavazos, Assistant Planner, gave a broad overview of the project and the purpose of the workshop. She presented a PowerPoint presentation(copy on file). She said the land use, architectural design and parking are main areas needing recommendation and comment from the Commission. Candyce Burnett, Planning Director said the application will require a General Plan Amendment, but only because there is an inconsistency with the table of uses, but not with the underlying zoning. Wayne Sant, representing Oakmont Senior Living, gave a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He explained there would be a decorative fence between the two courtyards to separate the memory impaired open space from the regular residents' area. He noted the differences in levels of care. He said there are different levels of Alzheimer's patients; their residents will be generally physically well but memory impaired. He discussed the various points of entry and the number of staff. In response to Chairman Wimberly he said only 10%of the residents will have vehicles and holidays are generally the only time there would be a shortage of parking. He thought their staff could park offsite and be picked up in their van on days when parking is short. He said there are no specific sustainable measures proposed other than their standard fixture/appliance package; solar has not been contemplated. Commissioner Munoz expressed concern about the east elevation and said it should be as interesting as the north elevation. He said he is fine with the land use. He said he does not favor the look of solar carports. He said this design is a good start that needs enhancement. Mike Smith, Associate Planner said Haven Avenue is a significant corridor and there needs to be more articulation in the roof line, added tower elements, and generally more elements on the elevations. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said he has no issues with the land use and he agreed they need to have consistency with the features of the elevations. Commissioner Macias said the design needs 360-degree architecture and he has no problem with the land use. Commissioner Fletcher noted this property was originally master planned and it was supposed to be office buildings. He said residential is easy to build and sell so with the master planning sites we often see the residential get built but the office portion never gets built. He said he does not like to lose the office potential, however, he has no issue Item C—2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES R i4 CHo SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 cnM0v Page 3 with senior care facilities as this is a good location, there is a big need for assisted living. He said this should have little impact to other adjacent neighbors. He said staffs comments are appropriate with respect to the design. He said the north elevation reminds him of the Virginia Dare Winery. He said it could be enhanced to look more luxury residential rather than institutional. He suggested more variance in the visual plane, and said additional elements such as pillars, wrought iron rails, columns, pop- outs and archways could be used. He said the east elevation should mimic the north as it is an important corner in the City. He said they could consider a covered roof structure over the van pick-up area. Mr. Smith noted the winery acts as the south side anchor and this development would be the north side anchor. Chairman Wimberly said he has no problem with the land use. He said the DRC team will work with them and 360- degree architecture is important. He agreed the east elevation needs to be spruced up. He said it fits the land use and will enhance that • property;a winery theme would be a good enhancement. He mentioned the possibility of solar carports. FIF� IV. ADJOURNMENT 8:17 PM j 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 3, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. Item C -3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES _RnxcHo SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 (,�LcaMo_rcn Page 4 The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. All requests for items to be placed on a Planning.Commission agenda must be in writing: Requests for scheduling agenda.items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF.REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports and minutes can be found at www.CityofRC.us Item C—4 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WORKSHOP MINUTES OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE PLANNING COMMISSION September 23, 2015 - 4:30 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center RAINS ROOM 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Pledge of Allegiance 4:37 p.m i Roll Call ® Chairman Wimberly X Vice Chairman Oaxaca X Munoz_X Macias _X Fletcher X Additional Staff Present: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director; Jeff Bloom, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Tom Grahn, Associate Planner; Donald Granger, Senior Planner, Betty Miller, Senior Engineer;Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Rob Ball, Fire Marshall; Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist 11 F17� II. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Historic Preservation Commission or the Planning Commission may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair,' depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Historic Preservation Commission or Planning Commission, not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises,or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. None Item D —1 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RANCHO SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 2 III. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION PRE APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2015-00802-CHARLES JOSEPH ASSOCIATES-A review of the site plan and elevations for a proposed 183-unit, multi-family apartment complex on 4.45 acres of land in the Mixed Use(MU)District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay District (FBOD), located at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Hermosa Avenue; APNs: 1077-601-13 and 1077-601-14. Tom Grahn, Associate Planner gave a brief PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). He noted the single-family house on a parcel to the east should be obtained by the applicant if possible to be included in the development as this would be difficult at a later time. He said the Mixed Use standards will be reviewed by the Council in October and once the standards are adopted, the old standards would no longer apply. He referred to Exhibit E of the staff report. He said the new standards for the General Plan and the Development Code should be in place by the time of a full submittal. In response to Commissioner Fletcher, he said the old home could be dedicated to a future use or redevelopment of the site. He noted the poor condition of it and that it could be a lost opportunity. He noted it is not considered a historical home or site. He said the current owners are not cooperative and a rehab would be very expensive. He said it could be used for a shared drive approach and pedestrian access. He said it could be used as a home or for a commercial use as it has in the past. The applicant was represented by Jonathan Cornelius(Vice President of Fore Property Company), Serafin Maranan (Architects Orange), Jennifer Easton (Architects Orange) and Chuck Buquet of Charles Joseph Associates. Chuck Buquet, Charles Joseph Associates, said this is a work in progress with a preliminary design. He said the contemporary design was brought forward with a previous project. He assented that the site does not show two uses and they need to work through this. He noted that tandem parking was approved for Empire Lakes. He said they will get a parking study for this development. He said they are ok with how the parking is currently shown. He said a good faith effort has already been made to the single home owner and he did not believe an acquisition is likely to happen. He did not agree that a drive aisle on the east side is justification for the acquisition. Jonathan Cornelius gave a brief company history. He said they perform a parking distribution analysis so tenants are not inconvenienced and they regularly provide tandem parking at their developments. He said it works fine if it is managed well and parking is assigned. He said they are fine with the parking ratio as it is and they have done it many times. He said they are not set in stone with the more urban look that is pushed toward the street. He said the current restriction of only allowing single-story buildings within 100 feet of existing homes leaves them few options for parking. He said with respect to the required mix of uses, there is the concern of not enough demand for Item D -2 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES J RANCHO SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 C CAMONGA Page 3 retail/commercial uses. He said they are open to creating a flex space that could be residential at first and then could be converted to commercial later if the demand changes. Serafin Maranan of Architects Orange said the buildings along Foothill Boulevard could have a commercial/storefront look. He said the main 4-story building is an elevator building. He said there are 2-story/double loaded carriage garages with a living space above on the 2nd floor. He said these units break up and soften the parking field. He said the clubhouse/fitness/leasing space is in the building along Foothill Boulevard and the fitness area is about 2,000 square feet. Mr. Cornelius said the fitness space is of legitimate size and not a token. He said they are attempting to activate the streetscape along Foothill i.e.generating activity. He said the owner of the single home is not a willing seller, so they are not hopeful. Mr. Buquet said with respect to Exhibit E, the land use mix is the only problem;the other • items will be provided later. Mr. Serafin said the green area in the courtyard is over 6,000 square feet of open space. Jeff Bloom, DCM Economic/Community Development said this is a chance to make the bridge to new ideas. He said the Commission has seen this concept in their field trips. He said with respect to tandem parking, we need to look at how it is applied. He appreciated the breakdown on the chart(Exhibit Q. He suggested the Commission look broadly at this. He suggested an agreement that will not hold this developer hostage later. He said some landholders have high expectations about the worth of their property. He said community activity is important and to plot out what is in the vicinity of this site. He said there is lots of latitude on the architectural style, as many are looking for more variety in the City's architecture. Chairman Wimberly said there is an opportunity to play with the concepts and step out of the box with this one. Vice Chairman Oaxaca said this would be innovative for us; a bridge project. He said this one is more important to the City than others because it is on an important corridor. He said we need to evolve. He said it is unfortunate we may not be able to incorporate the single-family parcel to the east. He said he would like to see more of the mixed use spirit. He said he is not totally comfortable with the size of the structures. He said for mixed use he is looking for a more pedestrian friendly design within and with continuity along the corridor;they need to facilitate movement to the transit options. He said there • is a timing challenge in that we are in transition as a City; we are working on future standards. He expressed concern about the parking as we do not want a problem later. He said he wants a greater assurance that this works in real life for the residents, guests and family. He said he does not want to make changes in the standards just for this Item D -3 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES J xcHa SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 •c oxcn Page 4 project. He said with respect to the contemporary design he would like to see a better visual in context. He said he wants to know we are making a good decision. Commissioner Macias said he likes the more modern architecture;he welcomes it. He said he is not too bothered by the single use issue; he believes achieving the correct density is more important to get transit in place. He said he likes the concept of the bottom floor design to appear to have mixed use development. He said the residential use would affect transit more than commercial. He suggested the applicant continue their discussions with the private property owner. He noted that as a child he observed Route 66 and recognized it as being very unique and totally inconsistent in design. He said he does not see the VIP Route 66 as being a trap because it'has a multitude of things included in it. He said it varied from historic elements all the way to the space age in design. Commissioner Fletcher expressed concern about urban development in this location. He said Foothill Boulevard is a mess and we need to create identity; we are losing our sense of identity. He said the Route 66 theme is more historic than urban and placing this contemporary architecture next to Villaggio is not consistent. He said TOD and this ' architecture is more appropriate to the south in the golf course area(Empire Lakes). He said he prefers the Tuscan/Mediterranean style. He said the development should be in conformance with the General Plan. He said the store front space sounds too small a space. He said the parking may be a problem. He said tandem parking is ok as long as there are enough spaces. He said he has a concern about urban massiveness on Hermosa/Foothill;it doesn't fit and needs a more historic presence as it is in line with the local wineries. Commissioner Munoz said the architecture is ok, he. is not opposed to more contemporary design as long as it provides lots of horizontal and vertical movement. He said it needs more natural materials. He said he is tired of the old stuff and has no problem with contemporary if it is well done. He said the parking is a real problem as there is no location for the parking to spill out to. He said with assigned parking and similar reduced parking arrangements, we tend to manage for about a year and then we have problems. He said one developer came back to us a year later asking for more parking on the streets. He said they will not be able to do that here. He said so far they are doing a good job. Chairman Wimberly said that if this is a TOD, the area needs to be more pedestrian friendly especially at the corner. He said that the density component and parking is not there yet. He said he looks forward to seeing their modifications. He said when they see the applicant again and as they work with staff he would like to not see variances or General Plan amendments; he wants it to be there without creating new rules. Item D -4 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES J RANCHO SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 CUCAMONGA Page 5 Mr. Cornelius said their submittal will come in behind the City adoption of their new standards. IV. ADJOURNMENT 5:50 p.m. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 17, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak,given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please sign in on the clipboard located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." . Any handouts for the Planning Commission should be given to the Planning Commission Secretary for distribution to the Commissioners. A copy of any such materials should also be provided to the Secretary to be used for the official public record. • All requests for items to be placed on a Planning Commission agenda must be in writing. Requests for scheduling agenda items will be at the discretion of the Commission and the Planning Director. Item D —5 PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES RA,,r�Ho SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 CucnMoxcA Page 6 AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are on file in the offices of the Planning Department, City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. These documents are available for public inspections during regular business hours, Monday through Thursday, 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., except for legal City holidays. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$2,486 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers while the meeting is in session. Copies of the Planning Commission agendas, staff reports . and minutes can be found at www.CitvofRC.us Item D —6 STAFF REPORT =�' f PL_1N\ING DEPARTMENT � RANCHO Date: October 28, 2015 CUCAt`1ONGA To: Historic Preservation Commission/Planning Commission From: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director By: Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary Subject: WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA/ETIWANDA AREA RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that following the report and presentation, the Commission discuss the examples of"winery theme architecture" and offer comment with respect to projects currently in process and in the future. Following the discussion, staff recommends the Secretary receive and file the report. BACKGROUND This report is in response to a special request received from Commissioner Fletcher. He asked that the agendas and minutes of the Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force be distributed to the other Commission members for review and comment. The Task Force commented on several proposed projects and a basic record of their work is included in the agendas and minutes (Exhibits • B, C, D and E). Commissioner Fletcher's concern centers around the time and effort spent on the Task Force and the concept of preserving and reflecting our"winery roots" in the areas identified by the Task Force. ANALYSIS A. The Etiwanda Base Line Task Force: In January of 2004, the Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was formed as an advisory subcommittee comprised of two Councilmembers, two Planning Commissioners and the City Planner acted as the staff coordinator. The Task Force met on an "as needed" basis to discuss possible land uses and conceptual architectural design with respect to nine identified areas found in the Etiwanda area (Exhibit A) generally located along Base Line Road between Day Creek Boulevard and east to Etiwanda Avenue and north to the 210 Freeway. It was determined that the nine areas were either adjacent to or near identified historic sites and therefore new development proposals should be carefully considered because of their historical/character neighborhood context. The Task Force met periodically between the years 2004 and 2008. The meetings were open to the public and at times, members of the Etiwanda Historical Society offered public comment. Three specific projects were reviewed by this group: the Winery Estates commercial center located at the southeast comer of Base Line Road and Day Creek Boulevard, a condominium project located on the north side of Base Line Road northeast of Filippi Winery and west of Victoria Park Lane and the proposed Walgreens (Etiwanda Marketplace) development (application was withdrawn) at the northeast comer of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane. Item E —1 WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA/ETIWANDA AREA October 28, 2015 Page 2 The Task Force reviewed the Winery Estates commercial center in 2004. Topics such as architectural compatibility with Filippi Winery, the desire for."specialty type"tenants, gathering spaces for social interaction/outdoor dining, directional paving and access to the winery were the focus of the discussion. The center was later built with these incorporated elements. The architecture reflects the warehouse/barnlike structures found in the adjacent Filippi Winery with Mediterranean elements such as shed style overhangs, iron accents and column supported trellises. In 2005 the Task Force reviewed a request for a 3-story, Seniors only condominium project located to the northeast of Filippi Winery across Base Line Road. The comments regarding the proposal focused on the overall density of the project, and the need for elevators and parking. Subsequently, a non-age restricted 2-story townhome development was recently constructed (Elevage) that reflects a Mediterranean with a Spanish influence style of architecture. With respect to the Walgreen's (Etiwanda Marketplace) development reviewed in 2008, the Task Force felt this use was not"special" enough nor appropriate and may be too intense for this prime location and although the Task Force offered no negative comments with respect to the preliminary architectural rendering, the application was subsequently withdrawn. B. Define Winery Theme Architecture: A significant challenge facing staff at this juncture is that although the Task Force reviewed possible land uses and architectural compatibility, the term 'Winery Architecture" was never clearly defined. Although likes and dislikes were readily expressed and certain parameters were voiced such as recognizing the fact that it would be r difficult to reflect a winery theme in 3-story condominiums, the recognizable elements of ` "Winery Architecture" were not determined. Staffs research indicates that the architecture reflected in our local area both in the mid to west side of Rancho Cucamonga and the Etiwanda (east side) was clearly eclectic. Economics played a tremendous role in the construction of a winery as well as the time of construction. Earlier wineries built in the mid-1800s were simple wood sheds. Rocks were sometimes incorporated in the foundation and in some walls. If the landowner thrived, more barns and warehouses would be added and improvements made. Unlike the wineries found today in popular areas such as Napa, Sonoma and Temecula, an elaborate architecturally specific building with a designated tasting area is a feature that was rare in our area until after the turn of the century. Staffs research indicates the most typical feature found in most wineries of any era was a preponderance of barnlike structures with at least one attached or unattached trellis along a single long wall. Vines were trained up and over the trellis to provide a shaded area below. Some wineries constructed from the 1930s-1970s were more likely to reflect a specific style such as the Rancho de Philo Winery in the Alta Loma area or incorporated interesting applications of tile, brick and rock as found in the Aggazotti Winery. Smaller family owned wineries such as the Mitchell Family Winery, constructed in 1918, simply reflected their success in the construction of the family residence. The Mitchell home is a 2- story Craftsman with Italianate influence and the typical grape trellis graces the front elevation. C. Wineries of the Past: Staffs research included reviewing the Historic Resources Survey prepared by Chattel Architecture (March 2010), images found in our historic files and images captured from the Internet. The focus centered on the architectural theme and style of the winery buildings and in many cases, the homes of the smaller landowners in the Etiwanda Item E —2 WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA/ETIWANDA AREA October 28, 2015 Page 3 area. The research uncovered a number of interesting facts highlighting the general commonalities and differences of wineries and their related structures found in the Rancho Cucamonga area versus the east end or Etiwanda area. Below is a table describing these points: Rancho Cucamonga (Mid to West Side) Etiwanda (East Side) Typically owned by landowners that had Small family owned wineries were often first prior successful winery experience/they or second generation immigrants from Italy were well funded prior to developing their and France. These landowners eventually wineries in Cucamonga. Some had their had to form co-ops to lessen the costs of start in Los Angeles, others on the East operation and to pool resources to survive. coast. Landowners had some resources with which Typically the landowners would construct to invest in a hired architect and could afford basic barn/warehouse structures to house to "design" their winery. The design of their operations and equipment using wineries such as Virginia Dare Winery was whatever local materials they could inspired by the Mission Inn in Riverside. find/afford. If they prospered, they invested Other wineries such as Opici, Filippi and in modest homes-most often in the Aggazotti, although simpler, reflect some Craftsman style. basic design elements of their European roots. Wineries were constructed of brick, stucco, The crude structures of these small stone and at times used massive timbers. landowners were practical and basic. Even Most wineries included either a covered when improved upon such as at the colonnade or sturdy trellis whereupon grape Cucamonga Pioneer Winery, the structures vines would be trained to provide a shaded were of simple construction. They included area. The trellis could be free standing or trellises that were attached to the main part of the main building. Structures such as structure providing a shaded area below the Thomas, Virginia Dare and Padre from the trained grapevines above but Wineries survived the test of time because tended to be less grand or as substantial of better construction practices, than their west side counterparts. Later maintenance and/or the original structures versions of the more prosperous were replaced with better structures as the landowners were more substantial in the landowner prospered. Craftsman style. These wineries may have offered a "tasting The tasting room was either a simple room" or a designated place such as under structure such as at Big Bear Winery or the a colonnade or under the trellis designed for public was simply served in the warehouse. the public and "to impress". It could be speculated that some tasting activities were conducted in the living rooms of their modest Craftsman homes depending upon the landowner. • Item E —3 WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA/ETIWANDA AREA October 28, 2015 Page 4 CONCLUSION Because the term "Winery Architecture" was never clearly defined for the Rancho Cucamonga/Etiwanda area and is, as the historical record demonstrates, eclectic, the City must also consider the uses and the users of today and the future when contemplating new development in these areas. Paramount to the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the desire to provide places and uses that not only appeal to the Millennials but also provide a sense of civic vitality and economic sustainability. At the same time, staff is charged with offering some respect to our past winemaking industry and in making recommendations that reflect good planning principles as well as quality design. Staff concludes that the Design Review procedures and basic design standards already in place, along with the public review process suffices for evaluating the logical placement of uses and for analyzing the respective architectural elements proposed. Staff will receive comment from the Commission regarding "Winery Architecture" and the Secretary will receive and file the report. Respectfully ubmitted, Candyce B eft Planning Director CB:LS Attachments: Exhibit A - Area map depicting nine possible development sites within the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Task Force scope of study Exhibit B - Task Force Agendas and Minutes 2004 Exhibit C - Task Force Agendas and Minutes 2005 Exhibit D - Task Force Agendas and Minutes 2007 Exhibit E - Task Force Agendas and Minutes 2008 Item E —4 �1 ccccc� • D � � e . a F ETIWANDA/EASE. LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA Cco MAY 18, 2004 -- 5:00 P.M. Civic Center-Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEE'T'ING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams Howdyshell McPhail Stewart B. PUB-LICCOMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the EtiwandalBase Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. . The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. M(s) FoR WscussioN: 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREAS 1 -9 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Monday, May 17, 2004, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. EXHIBIT B Item E -6 d NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, 5:00 p.m. in the Rains Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREAS 1 - 9 1 FA4 Z) Debra J. d s. CMC, City Cler City of Rancho Cucamonga May 17, 2004 • Item E -7 DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at al times mentioned herein have been, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on May 17, 2004, 1 posted a true and correct copy of the special Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Agenda dated May 18, 2004 at.5:00 p.m. to be held in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 17, 2004 in Rancho Cucamonga. ff 10"lo Debra J. Aderms, CMC City Clerk/Records Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —8 ARETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAMONCA APRIL 28, 2004 -- 5:00 P.M. Civic Center- Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL, TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams , Howdyshell , McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to. address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task.Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREAS 1 -9 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April 22, 2004, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —9 x � iii� r%,i %%/ S"+"'r .` � 'IJJIt!'IJIIAVIIJIIIIIIIr;3 '. � npv n sy��q[ ■ ��yy {�46 i /r/ IIIIJI_IAIIIOIIIIIIIIIII 4 ��� ��� �� � � �yg�p3@@@yo,�,i�q��y� �r��i ��� ��� t}}ijY}zrrr:Yrzzxr{ IIIIIisIIIIIi IIII�IIIIIIiss SRS MAIN I� ,+�e,+ rar�r' o4x. � "'��� {}fFFFfiffz}}}f FfFFFYF2�f;;;Sf;ffj#5555 �� � � ����� rig � , ��� MMAW `\ MRS ml OM ❖rIN �� a NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 5:00 p.m. in the Rains Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho.Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREAS 1 -9 bra J. Adafds, CMC, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga April 22, 2004 Item E —11 O DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at al times mentioned herein have been, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on April 22, 2004, 1 posted a true and correct copy of the special Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Agenda dated April 28, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on April 22, 2004 in Rancho Cucamonga. r� Debra J. 4erms, CMC �J City Clerk/Records Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E -12 ValAANCHORHO ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAMONGA MARCH 24, 2004 -- 5:00 P.M. ,Civic Center- Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams Howdyshell , McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 17, 2004 March 2, 2004 2. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF PLANNED AREA 6 — SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my • designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, March 18, 2004, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —13 February 17, 2004 O CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE.MINUTES Special Meeting = A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting'of-the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic.Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, February 17, 2004,.in the. Rains Room of the-Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center-Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams,-`Council Member Robert ,. . Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cristine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were: Brad Buller, City .Planner; Nancy Fong, Senior Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that the'purpose of the Task Force meeting was to have: continued discussion. regarding the historic„winery and the proposed, commercial center. He.. , mentioned that the applicant, Mike Rue of Marketplace Partners and.�Gino Filippi Winery have met to discuss the.development issues. Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, confirmed that there was a meeting. He stated they did.not talk-about the design of the project at.the meeting. .He. mentioned that 95 percent of the conversation was centered on ttie:appropriate uses for the site. He stated that.Gino Filippi had told him he has no problem with Henry's Market but that he wanted to see,a:.specialty center with pedestrian oriented destination type of uses. He then stated that 75 percent of the tenants he is.after is service oriented which are not destination- type uses. Mr. Rue continued to 'explain what makes a retail project work. and....what doesn't. He commented that the customers and the traffic-counts have to be there with a high ,level of tourism in order to-have a successful specialty center. He cited examples,of specialty centers where they have those criteria: City Walk in Universal City, downtown La Jolla, and Laguna Beach. He further stated if the area had'..been.developed as a wine country, a specialty center .. might also make sense. He then stated that this site does not have a consistent draw of tourists. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 11 2004Page 1 Item E —14 Mr. Buller asked Gino Filippi to respond. Gino Filippi, Filippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga;replied that'it was true with regard to .the..fundamental disagreement. They still believes that the site should be designed. for a specialty center with such uses as cafes, bookstores, restaurants, lots..of courtyards and public spaces. He referred to Chapter 7, page 16 of the Master Plan_which'... mentioned the winery integration theme. . He believed that the fundamental difference is that one is economic driven and the other is historic driven. Mr. Rue responded that the two different philosophies could be accomplished. ` John Melcher, architect and a concerned resident, stated he was the one who help organized . the design charrette back in: 1999. He 'encouraged the two players= to explore ways to, strengthen the uses. He'suggested that the.Task Force let the two players work together first. Mr. Buller responded that from day 1, Citystaff had encouraged. the: two players to work together. Mayor Pro Tem.Williams indicated how important it is to have the. two. sites appropriately integrate and work with each other. Commissioner McPhail commented that tourists and customers visiting Victoria Gardens could be encouraged to move up to the winery site via Arbor Lane. Commissioner Stewart commented that there is a larger picture that the Task Force needs to deal with. The larger picture is the integration of the project with the Winery, the creation of an entry to Etiwanda;,and for the site to provide convenience for the neighborhood. Mr. Rue produced:an overlay concept that showed a series of buildings,staggered adjacent to the north side of Henry's Market. The concept also included continuous pedestrian spaces and connections to the winery. James Banks, a concerned resident, clarified that.convenience should:not include drive-thru uses. Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated that drive-thru uses themselves make a.ttatement and attract a different user than.she believes would be good.for.the site. She also.noted that certain service type uses bring signs, both permanent and temporary, that she believes.would be problematic with the historical"nature this center needs to reflect. She believed that there are Other places, for drive-thru uses. Mr. Rue mentioned that he had compromised a lot.with the design of the project and that he still needed to have a viable successful project. He informed the Task Force'that Henry's Market . has certain criteria; which is not to allow too many restaurants close to the store for parking purposes. After more discussion on the possible features and uses where there is agreement, it was the consensus of the Task Force to continue to Tuesday, March 2 at 5:00 p.m.- The Task Force encouraged the applicant to continue to work With the winery between now and the March 2nd meeting. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 17, 2004 Page 2 Item E —15 D: .IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The Task Force agreed to continue their study of Area Six at the next meeting. E: ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February.17, 2004 Page 3 Item E —16 March 2, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the.Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday,.March 2, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 -Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting .was called to order at 5:10 P.M. Present were Task Force members: Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Councilmember Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cristine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present: Brad Buller, City Planner; B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION C1. Approval of Minutes: February 11, 2004 (Special Meeting) C2. Discussion on Area Six (Continued from February 17, 2004) Brad Buller, City Planner, opened the meeting.:and invited the attendees to continue the discussion of Area six..'He invited Mr. Rue to give his presentation. Mike Rue, of Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100, Tustin, gave a presentation and offered preliminary reductions of newly revised-plans. He reported that the Walgreen's drug store and fast food restaurant with drive-thru. on.have been removed from'th&revised plans. He added that an expanded view corridor of 70 has been provided between Buildings G and H based upon the comments from the last meeting. He reported that he''made the assumption that the City will accept a decrease of the setback on Base Line Road from.45 feet to 30 feet. He noted that the setbacks on Day Creek and Madrigal have remained tFie'.same as what was originally presented. He commented that because of an oversight, the setback for the winery property should have.also been given a 30-foot setback as well to lend uniformity to the{project. He commented that the biggest change is in the shape of Retail B building.. He commented that it has been redesigned from a boxy look to more of a specialty look and feel with a generous plaza that can be a place for people to gather. He noted elements such as a walking pattern that leads people from the shops back to the winery, lending interest to theentire center, a double water feature, a seating area, and decorative pavers. He reported that with the significant grade differential, opportunities for raised planters and steps would be possible along Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Stud Task Force"e Minutes March 2, 2004 Page 1 Item E —17 this plaza. He added that the center reflects several different styles of architecture for interest Cwith features such as towers, louvered shutters, trellis', and shade. coverings.- He commented that the proposal includes major changes in signage that would add 'a.softer look to the development. He referred to the site plan and commented that his design team believes this :. . new look and features such as the building arrangement and water element and seating will help attract restaurant uses and more specialty type tenants such as a jeweler.and gift store. He suggested that more convenience type uses.could be positioned near the south end of the center and hold off leasing the remaining spaces for,the specialty type tenants. He'added that they met with Pete Pitassi and Gino Filippi just prior to this meeting to look=-at-the possibility to work together towards the future possibilities for. their property in conjunctiori'with this center including a possible 2=1ane country style road featuring rustic.fencing up to the grapevines and signage that helps and.ericourages people to transition between the centerand the winery. He commented that the area for this type of access could be designated immediately: Mr..Buller thanked him for presenting some alternatives to the original design. He asked for comments from Mr. Pitassi and his team on the ideas presented: .Gino Filippi, Filippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga; acknowledged that he had met with Mr. Rue at 4:00 p.m. and that Pete Pitassi had met them earlier to discuss the ...uses and the design. He said they were encouraged with the direction and the elimination of the:Walgreen's and the drive-thru but still have significant concerns with the.uses. He commented that he would prefer the conditions .of approval for the Conditional- Use .Permit "memorialize" what has been determined as appropriate uses including what is' prohibited, locations on. the site of certain uses, etc. so that the issue does not have to be revisited at a later time: ,He noted that the (� proposed plaza area is encouraging and they would like to see more of an east/west orientation instead of a north/south orientation in accordance with the Master Plan:.arid to,foster the connection and special relationship between the two properties. He stated'that he believes the management of the property and issues of signage, graphics, and lighting details should be handled with the creation-of the initial documents and that they need to address these issues on a planning level first and then issues of architectural detail, building materials and massing for example, will come into play later, when all parties are:comfortable. Mr. Buller opened up the discussion to the Task Force for comments. _ Jan Sutton, President, Etiwanda Historic Society, 972 East Washington .Boulevard, Upland, stated that she believed-that the focus of the Task Force was to not only bei-on this property but 'the other areas in Etiwanda as well that will be:eventually developed. She- commented that there is a general lack of philosophy on how--all these areas are to.,be developed and considering this development in detail is more difficult without this philosophy being established. She noted she had attended a conference hosted by the California Association. Foundation where they discussed a Cultural Resources Survey where in the past: the focus was on architecture and -now the focus is more on the importance and. the- cultural.. importance conservancy of the original uses of historic buildings. She added that.we don't see many historic buildings being rehabilitated to their original uses and the importance of wine industry as part of the culture of Rancho Cucamonga. She commented that she would hate to see this area become a "lost opportunity' to reflect the important.cultural aspects of the.area. She noted that there had been some discussion about the development reflecting elements of City Walk, Disneyland, or other large developments. She remarked that she does not see that type of Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes March 2, 2004 Page 2 Item E —18 development here, but that the ideas used in areas such as Claremont or Colorado Boulevard could be reflected in-this development. She noted the uses are.really important and but what she keeps hearing from the design team is that it is a community center and the uses should be special and that they will try to do special retail but there is no commitment for that and it is for subtly, quietly for convenience uses. Jim Banks, a resident,in Etiwanda, stated he. agreed with Ms. Sutton's comments. He then handed out a draft proposal to the Task Force. He`proposed to establish an extra set of standards around .historic.sites or buildings to create a right environment:for them. The proposed standards would be more in spirit with the Victoria Arbors Master Plan with"regard to the winery. Chuck Buquet, Charles..Joseph Associates, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite .395, Rancho Cucamonga, stated that the city should not be changing the standards in the midst of a project. The developer designed the project in a good faith effort to City standards. Mr. Banks responded that the design was not in the.spirit of the winery. John Mannerino, Mannerino and Briguglio, stated that he is encouraged with the communication but mentioned that this is nota design review session. Frank Lizarraga, attorney:for Filippi Winery, commented that he had received a copy of the Development Agreement and the Master Plan for Victoria Arbors. He noted that the master plan recognized the importance of the two parcels and has language that required the two parcels be master planned at a more refined level as "one project." He added that the proposed project with the buildings backing up to the winery created two distinct projects and he could not see how it could be considered "one project." Mr. Rue responded that the Master Plan also list the types of uses that are permitted which includes a grocery store, and pharmacy. Mr. Buller responded that the points made by both sides are accurate. He added that the goal is-for the two properties to support and enhance each other. He further added that the intention of the master plan is to bring the two properties together, master plan it with-define uses and design continuity under.the.Conditional Use Permit.. He commented that the-bigger question is how to relate and link the two properties, which the Task Force needs to discuss.. Mr.. Rue responded that he senses the design is not an issue and that the issue. is over the uses. Mayor Pro Tem Williams asked what would be the right uses and wrong uses. She further asked Mr. Rue what is his.definition of convenience uses. Mr. Rue replied that the typical uses are those found in a neighborhood center with' a supermarket, video, beauty salon,jewelry store, cafe, cleaners, etc. Mr. Buller suggested that the Conditional Use Permit-allows the opportunity to define compatible uses by area within the center. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force.Minutes March 2, 2004 Page 3 Item E —19 Commissioner Stewart commented that the opposition-is to the uses. She would like to see a list of defined uses. She added that she is not sold on an east/west orientation of the buildings but there is the need for strong east/west pedestrian-linkages with an expanded courtyard into thewinery. property. She further added that the proposed architecture reflected too close to Terra Vista Town Center and is.not a distinctive one.. She suggested that the center provide . space for the winery to have a winery gift shop. Commissioner McPhail stated that she is encouraged with the communication between the'two `parties and pleased with the.east/west orientation of.pedestrian spaces. She stated.she agreed with Pam's comments. Counci(member Howdyshell,commented that he is pleased that the drive-thhu.uses are removed and that it appears the issue is down.to the discussof acceptable uses: ion - Mayor Pro Tem Williams stated that this issue did not.come about last month; because she had raised it a year ago, and it has taken this long for someone to listen. She added:that she would like to see a seamless'project.between the two properties, and believed that it'is an opportunity -to-createa specialty centernot found elsewhere: She further added that the architecture-has to be different from the Terra.Vista Town Center look: ' r •r r r D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING The Task Force members concurred that they would'reconvene on Wednesday, March 24, at 5:00 p.m. to continue their discussion of Area Six E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller, City Planner Approved: Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force.Minutes March.2, 2004 'Page 4 Item E —20 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, March 24, 2004, 5:00 p.m. in the Rains Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 17, 2004 March 2, 2004 2. CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF PLANNED AREA 6 - SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BASE LINE ROAD AND DAY CREEK BOULEVARD De'bra J. Ada s, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga March 18, 2004 Item E -21 Q DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at al times mentioned herein have been, the City clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on March 18, 2004, 1 posted a true and correct copy of the special Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Agenda dated March 24, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho .Cucamonga, California. declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on March 18, 2004 in Rancho Cucamonga. ebra J. A ms, CMC City Clerk/Records Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —22 ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE I NCHO TASK FORCE AGENDA CuC&MONCA MARCH 29 2004 -- 5:00 P.M: Civic Center-Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams , Howdyshell , McPhail , Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 11,2004 2. DISCUSSION ON AREA SIX(Continued from February.17,2004) D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, February 26, 2004, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —23 February 11, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was —6eld�ednesday, February 11, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:35 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Council Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cristine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney t • i 4 i B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS 4 f t ! 4 C: ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION C1. DISCUSSION OF SCOPE OF REVIEW Brad•Buller, City Planner, explained the format of the Task Force. Mayor Pro Tem Williams explained her concerns with the name of the Task Force used on this agenda and suggested it be modified to reflect her concern for the historical context of the area to be reviewed. Mr. Buller presented exhibits that identified historic landmarks and vacant or under-developed parcels in the area of possible review. He reviewed the size and existing zoning of nine areas along Etiwanda Avenue and Base Line Road. Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #100,Tustin, requested that Area 6 be identified by Mr. Buller be excluded from the discussion because of the pending Conditional Use Permit currently in process. John Mannerino,attorney representing MarketPlace Partners,9333 Base Line Road,#110,Rancho Cucamonga,also asked that Area 6 be excluded because of the existing Development Agreement covering this property. Jan Sutton,President,Etiwanda Historic Society,972 East Washington Boulevard, Upland,did not agree with excluding this area and expressed her desire that the entire area be studied. Chuck Buquet, 10681 Foothill Boulevard, #395, Rancho Cucamonga, representing MarketPlace Partners, suggested that more details be shown on the exhibits presented by Mr. Buller. Item E —24 Mr.Buller explained it was a timing issue and that the maps created include the latest data currently in our geographic information system and that is why he also posted the tract map exhibit showing existing lots in the Arbors project. John Morrisette, American Beauty, 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Encino, explained his company's support for the project in process in Area 6. He noted concern with how the timing and scope of this Task Force will affect MarketPlace Partners' ability to move forward with their project. Pete Pitassi, architect for Filippi Winery, 8439 White Oak, #105, Rancho Cucamonga, stated his support for the formation and scope of the Task Force. Mayor Pro Tem Williams presented some of her concerns with the various uses that are being considered in the area of study not just Area 6. Mr.Rue believed that of all of the nine areas identified by staff,their site is different because it is the only one governed by a Development Agreement. Mr.Mannerino commented it should be everyone's goal to live up to the contract of the Development Agreement. Mr. Morrisette suggested that the focus should be to address Area 6 first because of the pending application currently going through the process. Commissioner Stewart acknowledged the importance of Area 6 and agreed that in priority of discussion, the Task Force should discuss Area 6 first. Mayor Pro Tem Williams expressed her interest in seeing spectacular development of properties in the area of the study and that is why she asked for formation of the Task Force. Ms. Sutton said that the plans she has seen for Area 6 look like every other center. She said the Historic-Society is looking for a specialty center. She noted her concern that the area is losing its historic structures to rooftops. She was not opposed to retail uses in Area 6. Council Member Howdyshell agreed with Ms. Sutton and was not opposed to retail uses in Area 6 but noted that it must be integrated with the historic winery. He said the plans he had seen did not incorporate the two sites and their uses well. Gino Filippi, Filippi Winery, 12467 Base Line Road, Rancho Cucamonga, did not think the uses proposed for Area 6 are appropriate adjacent to the winery. Mr. Buquet restated his client's interest in working with the Fillipis on a plan that can work. D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING After some more discussion about options for the planning of Area 6, the Task Force agreed to adjourn the meeting because of time and reconvene on Tuesday, February 17,2004, at 5:00 p.m. for the purpose of further discussions on the planning of Area 6. It was stated that MarketPlace Partners will present their latest proposal and representatives of the winery will be asked to comment on the plans. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 11, 2004 Page 2 Item E —25 Mr. Pitassi expressed his concern that the Task Force not lose sight of the bigger picture. He felt the bigger picture should be discussed before the focus on Area 6. E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes February 11, 2004 Page 3 Item E —26 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, March 2, 2004, 5:00 p.m. in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: 1 . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 11, 2004 2. DISCUSSION ON AREA SIX (Continued from February 17, 2004) ebra J. Ada , CMC City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk February 26, 2004 • • Item E -27 DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at al times mentioned herein have been, the City clerk of the city of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on February 26, 2004, 1 posted a true and correct copy of the special Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Agenda dated March 2, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. to be held in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on February 26, 2004 in Rancho Cucamonga. Debra J. ms, CMC City Clerk/Records Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —28 AETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAM GA FEBRUARY 17, 2004 -- 5:00 P,M. Civic Center- Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 ADJOURNED MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams Howdyshell , McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION j 1. DISCUSSION ON AREA SIX (continued from February 11, 2004) D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING ; This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 10500 Civic Center Drive. lei Item E —29 NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force (formerly known as the Etiwanda Arbors Task Force) meeting of Wednesday, February 11 , 2004, 5:30 p.m., adjourned to Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at the hour of 5:00 p.m., in the Rains Rooms at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, the purpose of continuing their discussion of scope of review. Z'M/h!7Q Mural M C, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga February 12, 2004 Item E —30 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, declare as follows: That I am the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga; that at a special meeting of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force,which was held February 11, 2004; the meeting was adjourned to Tuesday, February 17, 2004; at the hour of 5:00 p.m. to be held at City Hall in the Rains Room, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, and that a copy of said notice was posted at a conspicuous location within 24 hours of said adjournment. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 12, 2004, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. bra J. Ad s, CMC City Clerk Item E —31 ETIWANDA ARBORS TASK FORCE AGENDA PAGE 1 jAvcKo FEBRUARY 11, 2004 -- 5:30 P.M. C�►�oHc� Civic Center- Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams Howdyshell McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda Arbors Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C._ ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF SCOPE OF REVIEW D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda Arbors Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT 1, Debra J. Adams,.City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, February 5,2004,twenty-four(24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —32 i NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda Arbors Task Force will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, February 11, 2004, 5:30 p.m. in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 1.0500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: 1. DISCUSSION OF SCOPE OF REVIEW Debra J. Ada s MC City of Rancho Cucamonga City Clerk February 5, 2004 Item E -33 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY May 18, 2004 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams, Council Member Robert Howdyshell, and Planning Commissioners Cristine McPhail and Pam Stewart Staff present were: Brad Buller, City Planner; Kevin Ennis, Assistant City Attorney B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION Brad Buller, City Planner, explained to the Task Force that the meeting tonight is to review for informational purposes the design of the project in Area 1, Marketplace. He asked the applicant, Mike Rue to describe the project design. Mike Rue, Marketplace Partners, 13522 Newport Avenue, #200, Tustin, described the changes to the design, the hardscape connections, the architecture, the amenities, and the proposed signage. Mr. Buller mentioned that the project has passed design review and would be forwarded to the July 14 Planning Commission meeting. He also noted that staff would be initiating an amendment to the Master Plan to handle the prohibitive use issue. Pete Pitassi, Pete Pitassi Architects, stated they have worked out the issues and they are in support of the project. Commissioners Stewart and McPhail stated they are in support of the project design. Councilmember Howdyshell stated he is also in support of the project. Item E —34 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY ® D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING Brad Buller, City Planner, stated that the Task Force would reconvene when there is additional information submitted for any of the remaining areas in consideration. E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Brad Buller City Planner Approved: Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes May 18, 2004 Page 2 Item E —35 ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 RANCHO TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAMONGA MARCH 309 2005 -- 4:00 P.M. Civic Center-Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams Alexander McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. .ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting.. E. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois Schrader, Planning Department Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2005, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. EXHIBIT C Item E —36 AETIWANDAIBASE .LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 RANCHO TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAMONGA MARCH 30, 2005 -- 4:00 P,M. Civic Center- Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams , Alexander , McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. . E. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois Schrader, Planning Department Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2005, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —37 PAGE 1 Item E -38 T H E C I T Y 0 F Z: P A N C 11 0 COCA 1 0 N G A Staff Report DATE: March 30, 2005 TO: Members of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 The applicant, Cal Coast Homes, LLC, has requested to meet with the Task Force to present a proposal for age restricted, 55 years and older, for sale condominium housing within Planning Area 3 of the Etiwanda/Base Line Study area. • Attached is a map of the area to be discussed. The applicant intends to provide additional exhibits and a detailed proposal at the meeting for the consideration of the Task Force. Respectfully Submitted, Brad r Brad City Planner BB:Is Attachment: Map of Planning Area 3 Item E -39 March 30, 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Wednesday, March 30, 2005, in the Rains Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Task Force Members Present: Mayor William Alexander; Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams; and Planning Commissioners Pam Stewart and Cristine McPhail. Staff Present: Brad Buller, City Planner and Dan Coleman, Principal Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION 1. Discussion Of Planning Area 3 Brad Buller, City Planner, explained that the purpose of the Task Force meeting was to obtain input regarding proposed development of Planning Area 3. Bob Grigsby, the applicant, presented their concept of seniors only "for-sale" condominiums at northeast comer of Base Line Road and San Carmela Court. He apologized that his partner, who had the project renderings, was delayed. Mayor William Alexander asked Mr. Grigsby if their project had to be this dense to pencil out? Mr. Grigsby replied that it did not. Mayor Alexander indicated that he did not like 3-story buildings and felt the project was too dense. Mayor Pro Tem Diane Williams said she thought the concept of seniors only condominiums was a great idea. In particular, she liked the range of unit sizes. Mr. Buller explained that project woull require a General Plan Amendment, a zone change, and a Development Agreement to reduce parking ratio standards. He indicated that the Item E —40 purpose of this meeting was to get a concurrence of the Task Force to determine whether the concept is acceptable. Mayor Alexander reiterated his objections to the proposed density. He expressed his desire for garden cottages of 800 to 1,100 square feet in 1- and 2-story plans. Planning Commissioner Pam Stewart agreed that the project concept was too dense. She supported the idea of garden cottages as a buffer to the existing neighborhood. She felt the project would bring needed pedestrian traffic to the neighborhood. She indicated that she would not support any reduction in parking. Mayor Pro Tem Williams said that there are 30 and 40 year olds living with senior parents at Villa Pacific, another"seniors only" project. She felt that parking must be adequate. Commissioner Stewart indicated that this is a different area, with a lot of new expensive housing. Planning Commissioner Cristine McPhail said that project must provide lifts and elevators. Mayor Pro Tem Williams agreed that even 2-story buildings would need lifts and elevators. Commissioner McPhail stated that a safe pedestrian crossing must be provided at Base Line Road. Principal Planner Dan Coleman indicated that a traffic signal is planned at intersection. • Peter Pitassi, architect representing Joseph Filippi Winery, commented that they were not opposed to residential land use. Pedestrian movement in this area is a major design consideration. He said that it would be inappropriate for the City to give incentives for market rate housing. He stated that the project should meet all City parking standards. He indicated that some developers, such as Lewis Homes, are now planning 2 or 3 times as much visitor parking as the Development Code would require. He felt that architecture is very important in how it ties into the heavy winery theme of the area and the Henry's Market shopping center. He stated that it is tough to do a 3-story product with a winery theme. He commented that two full ingress/egress access points needed for residents. Gino Filippi, Joseph Filippi Winery, agreed that residential land use is acceptable. He requested that the project incorporate vineyard planting into the landscape design. D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None E. ADJOURNMENT ')RAItr Meeting adjourned at 4:45 p.m. Item E —41 ETIWANDABASE LINE - HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA C o% NOVEMBER 14, 2005 -- 6:00 P.M. Civic Center-Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Alexander .Williams , McPhail , Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF ETIWANDA DEPOT PROPERTY ADJOINING PLANNING AREA 1 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. E. ADJOURNMENT 1, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Wednesday, November 9, 2005,twenty-four(24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —42 T H E C I T Y O F ..,. 0 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Staff Repoit DATE: November 14, 2005 TO: Members of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force; Kevin McArdle, Community Services Director; Joe O'Neil, City Engineer FROM: Dan Coleman, Acting City Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF ETIWANDA DEPOT PROPERTY ADJOINING PLANNING AREA 1. BACKGROUND: In November of 2000, the City Council adopted the. Master Plan for the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. The Master Plan identified the Etiwanda Depot as a signature trailhead. Based on the proximity of the station to the planned Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail and its historic significance, the City has expressed interest in developing the property into a museum and trailhead. Mayor. Pro Tem Diane Williams, Bob Curtis, Friends of the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail, staff, and representatives of San Bernardino Associated Government (SANBAG), toured the site in the summer of 2001. The City Council, subsequently, directed staff to further investigate potential Building and Fire Code compliance issues, particularly the fire risk assessment. The Fire, Building & Safety, and Planning Departments inspected the station property on October 18, 2001. Both the Fire and Building & Safety Departments conducted additional detailed inspections that resulted in a list of Code compliance issues. Subsequently, the former tenant, EI Dorado Wood Products, resolved some of the issues by cleaning up the site. LEASE TERMS: In February 2004, the City entered into a long-term lease with the property owner, SANBAG. Use limitations are cited within our lease: "The use of the premises is limited to the City's "signature trailhead," related community activity uses, and trail uses consistent with the Inland Empire Pacific Electric Trail Master Plan, dated November 2000; both parties have a copy. The premises may not be used for any other purpose without SANBAG's prior consent." At first reading, this may seem very restrictive; however, "related community activities" could include a bed and breakfast or restaurant which supports trail users. The lease specifically addresses the issue of subletting the property. Any sublease must be consented to by SANBAG. Fifty (50) percent of any rent from subletting goes to SANBAG; however, "The City may retain one hundred (100) percent of all rent received by City from its subtenants...provided that all such rent is used to operate and maintain' the Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail. • SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The 4-acre property consists of the historic railroad depot. The • long, narrow property is essentially flat and vacant, except for the depot structure, a scale, and the remaining railroad siding tracks. The City's Public Works Department is using the property Item E —43 BASELINE HISTORIC TASK FORCE STAFF REPORT ETIWANDA STATION O November 14, 2005 Page 2 as a satellite maintenance yard. The property is secured by a chain link fence, which is partially topped with barbed wire. The station property is located in an area that is changing considerably. The station is no longer located in a sparsely developed rural area. The station is in the heart of an emerging historic enclave anchored by the Etiwanda Congregational Church, Chaffey-Garcia and Norton Fisher Houses to the south, and the Isle House to the west. To the east is a vineyard planted on a large property containing the Historic Landmark, the Jim Banks House. To the south is the Pacific Electric Railway corridor, and further south is Grapeland Elementary School. CONSTRAINTS: Any discussion of appropriate land uses on this property must consider: • Adjoining residential and school uses. A housing tract will be built soon on the land to the north. • Narrowness of the property (138 feet wide). • Scale of the Depot building (square feet). • Compatibility with the trailhead. LAND USE OPPORTUNITIES: A trailhead and associated amenities must be included in planning regardless of what other land uses are considered. Staff believes that the depot building and its railroad track siding should be the focus of the trailhead, both because of their historical significance to the Pacific Electric Railway, but also because the depot can house important trailhead amenities, such as public restrooms. With that knowledge, staff brainstormed the attached list of potential uses for the property and the depot building. These ideas range from a community garden to small-scale commercial. With over 15,000 miles of existing "rail trails" across the United States, there are numerous examples of the synergism that can happen when commercial businesses co-exist with the trail. Obvious examples include bicycle retail/rental/repair shops and quick service/fast food restaurants or snack bars. Less obvious commercial uses that can benefit from, and in turn promote rail trails, include bed and breakfast inns and restaurants. To facilitate the discussion of land use, three alternative Site Plans have been drawn (see attached). These plans are based upon modules of uses that are, to varying degrees, interchangeable from one plan to the next. • Alternative 1 focuses on the trailhead use, with a Pacific Electric Railway museum (inside depot), trailhead rest area, community garden, and a public works maintenance facility. The trailhead would include 40 parking spaces plus "pull-through" spaces for vehicles towing horse trailers and buses: Since the City leased property, the City's Public Works Department has been using the property as a satellite yard facility for storing landscaping materials and equipment. • Alternative 2 is geared toward active sports including a youth center (inside the depot), hard courts for tennis and basketball, and soccer fields for small children. Staff would not Item E —44 BASELINE HISTORIC TASK FORCE STAFF REPORT ETIWANDA STATION November 14, 2005 Page 3 recommend a skate park at this location because of the lack of visibility from Etiwanda Avenue. Unlike the Spruce Skate Park, this location would require the police to drive onto property for patrolling. • Alternative 3 celebrates the community's agricultural heritage and includes an agricultural museum (inside the depot), and organic farm (including retail sales of produce and flowers), community garden, and a vineyard. The Etiwanda Depot building has potential to accommodate more than one use. The attached Floor Plan shows the various rooms. One of the interior design challenges is that the west and east halves of the building are not physically connected by any hallway because of a difference in floor elevations. The east "warehouse" portions were elevated about 4 feet higher to achieve the proper height for loading rail cars. Retrofitting ADA access to the restrooms located in the west half will be just one of the design challenges. The two largest rooms are located in the east half and have the highest potential for a community meetings or activities. Staff believes that the west half is more suited to a museum space because of its easy access and original use as a railway station waiting room and ticket booth. PUBLIC INPUT: The Base Line Historic Task Force should consider a process for soliciting public comments regarding the use of this property as well as the timing of public input relative to discussions by the full Council and Park and Recreation Commission. Examples of community groups that could be contacted include the Etiwanda Historical Society, the Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail, the Master Gardener program, and the Etiwanda School District. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Base Line Historic Task Force discuss the land use alternatives and provide direction to staff. Resp submitte , Dan Coleman Acting City Planner 1 DC/ge Attachments: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Site Plan Exhibit C - Floor Plan Exhibit D - Alternative Land Use Plans (colored versions will be available at meeting) Exhibit E - Land Use Ideas • Item E —45 :.��ryl•' ft+i. FRH V, ti LNui nm}+ i.,}m 3'f°�` ,,/ �1 5Ff4lhE-..: f y: ��■ ,'cl,� �.�' �r* �� g t• r*: �� � ��,e �` • - ALV `, �= ,�' a' .�iaw'++. t�• �� r` �s (•xtR ,Rp � °� F 4 rxYaF`f"'c -� ,1� v 7 r� r. � n � , fit �� � r nu:$trn � +�. k.::. �xfifi ?N[�5�■� 00-i, ' g,�F �+}•!$;.�h 'ILLI.` bx. � f Z us f?.S wr.: 7}' 4�,. }itl"yJ R,tr.. . �� gsit h -'�+�s�"f� xt �'. ..,�,� IG�tu71���t. k#*J�` ��"`�-* i't � "'� • t ,.a S+P• {r amq`�. 4y J,feiF ti•at1�Y�{-r .�.,• 't �.�.sr'S��r•3`S.nrS. �*SS.dCxN"' - .��. t� $7E�,Y1>r,u'SW.,•. .t.,l�yy�l�L ti u .x £� 4�en ,�xiUt� .'°ter.-� & u�, a�:• W a xtrxyk �`n;" y+ ;P L.e4:'. aTu+�rrs 1A4+mtcNlyf3A.9 mT RE OM C,�,.•+3 &o-p r:�°I M1�'4 r!L hip. ^ �..er}F`'3'P'UGfa .�a � 4i .r ss.a:r r s ty+� w.+ac , � e �x ur Fxu «: t T �, �,�s'',.,�-• _� �+Vr.i 1 ni �(f" M Y,+ ,�q'f Lf Y t f `l T,CF - lY '�,}IYr lil `.L4 t `'x.!•� /S$t KA � H � S. �• ' Ir*"fi' 'r�a • ,-r - u .i „ (Q 5�t: ! K\.yr't vl . ,.:.. � •x.ei JL._�'iilR�!.+.5..,..J. ;' �� � aidf�v.'Si2 K6�t� �" L k a.^R�It T5��gF`LStw�i iY RTY N"' Y L.tYY.Y�4� ��f�k'�tfi � . '�kF�`' ,-rA st9 i 5MEMO �© r'q�k'.�.a nw`�^'e'�n. '4.'^S'St' n1y5.} * g �•.. .Is iPll r I A via 9.i i. ��•. [96riJ?'AOe ST.`y[�3 l'3�`itJ N.d 5ra-� "{.*�xe 18 ��\��III��� .t a:.r,'1.+�... e`.'l ?:..ehd Y_�s?��Qg�..%• E.v�°`3�..�'s V&A �. . 1111111 1 ��■ R iia• rl, ,rr: _ PROPERTY LINE 131p 91' PROPERTY LINE "O.W _ � t fu E •DEPOT a a f O PROPERTY LINE 131847 QQz PRaPERrr LINE 660.00' PACIFIC ELETRIC RAILWAY ETIWANDA STATION,RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA. 9 1a2.160 SA ,teo s.D.FT.-aa.1e ACNes SCALE• EXISTING S1TIE: PLAN (E)SIDEWALK- PROPERTY UNE 1318.97 n CC3C� Q *P.P. aP.P. '�, aP.P. 466 CUAW 9CA1E8 FENCE LINK W-n V o' IC3-n 29'-p• DRIVENAY w=v r} IXISTING EXISTING . PALM P.P.m TREES RAILS MAILBOX— o 7 CABLE m WATER RArP P.P. o P.P. pD V SIGNALJ 4 CI DEPOT CNAINLINK FENCE z c P.P. a • EXISTING GAS PROPERTY UNE 1318.97- EXISTING METER 122'-B• 5 d R PALM swG ul DRIVEHAY Qa cn PACIFIC ELETRIC RAILWAY w �PE� 3 0 ,•. A9 No= 4 UO (E)SIDEY+ALK- AN ETIWANDA STATION, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. SITE 2.160 A PUNS 182,180 S.O.FT.=44.18 ACRES v�ma PUNS SULE� � JE:XI:E3-F1 rVG SITE PLAN I•_R'-o Al FLOOR PLAN NOT1 0 aKwoo oiEn�ara•.c MNiM—aLEnGE. IJ 1• © IarNDlD ovee evtanN]rolcREre•Rawl orwe! 0 r�n•m0 ovist o,lTw6 orWNG ! 1• M (• r1OE.Os.G IsMO0r1 2 Q MOT gt14fML DOa/ NOIENe YE2EB .Cre ON tr•uf0 ruTrm• ] ORKMLI ROLM•COVR M 1100/•rK wrERUL Mm , RFSMDOI ORKN•L PlirtlOO OYER NMDO,RIOT aelrwlu.J. OPOIe1G IAED f 011 wND01•C. Row p ❑E YDOi MOVE. 10T ORKMML ' M 1�- ROMA21' 1 eNOe a f---NM vY/.wnlw:.1•NR Y•oE . , .J. Room" le - n w eETNEEr•alanxG rornne Nua•rlD eNDs 11 I] ROOYp • Ifssmam sa ® bf aNW alKE wM VY/••IR oJ[R Roll "D"'�e1 WHO 11 bE ONDa Mi NM III/M6 OMP 11 $ . , " 1• '\'� '��: n DRKUW foOD MC[fT NUOOt F 12 ROD,Ip i ] RODYN � I• .� I RDD11M / I❑1 ORq•/ED EEING r0 N4 wM IY2!tt✓vRE%M Y I ': ; 2 LYMnMG " 1! 1! 1. � RiuwD W[R LMIaTIMG NINDq, Lq\ IE OMIGWL RBCp,EO/JIOI • ,! ] 0 dM b oaewer!eruRa ulD wmflD wool vMDp1 PARTIAL FLR PLAN �l E ..am eTtTa rD p•M n Erc2 ORKeIlL). ND2 rO 2 E WALL LEGEND ® euE L 'J t� E(wu TNr s rr aeNr• M RPe1G t•I1Rr Nr11/!UryER eT•14e. wET OR1GwIL N . .•'^_._ j. os•uc aDmn ww! © oa�DOOR!w.!'Ilwe)rvW.•COME O OIOGlYL r.......POWco. ——I—To Vmd.Q0.• r/] w ROD/NIM DRTtM4. MEM NL"-w1l a Iw w Malu1ET.Mrla u1D DIITM o w TO Md A EXISTING NOTED FLOOR PLAN (NOTED) © w9. �' ©i cNKD.•L Naw iwlnes . . � oRK1M.•a G/RonG wrN a/Kfau RaLLm DDDRe. Q aDGw,lL"'o's txaere FE d•Gf•LL RAIi DMDeR/w0 pf1G/IeL DOOR•NO to © LOC1tMK rl01ua9rti T1T[JL M eaiw r,Rvs Iwo •PJrEl19 RCl110oRt 3 2t w CLM 4!EYr mI41 4. -1.4 MPGR Is ENKeiLL TO wt CI,,O m rY Y l4 /Y /J J /Y IV T / W W li•!r �• 00 ml ► 41. e .! Room el a MAINwLR • f• F31DulEp .. -fir ..wwleMween ' /� ► En ! • i RDDYiI � a . �1, � W �Ell. J ! MJ -air al—W ..r} Y ..p v.l• ..p f,I f'•Y M .rp•.d ..d••7 f-d..f. ,. FA2 - � EXISTING DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN (DIMENSIONED) eCALE. ! Community ren a R a #3 Space.h Organic Form ' ! Parking }�-�j�, ;` _,tom%`r`- 1� •� --if-Y ��`� Community Gardens .., ':•i Y! ' ' I !tet' f..• i_- -!�j'' .>_•. ✓...J 1-. ..II. -i��1_-Ii!!I ?I!I' -�1I1I_.11I !•-�' rL:�----_- —_--77 ••• ibeds I1-_ --J-!j Vineyard bemmtstrotion Arco Water bibs Mant Maintenance shed _ILO!Agricuuusu 11 _ dI . Mulch/fertilizer location Noi fit I IF I=_ ' T ) and edestr on 1­1 I i I Passive Open SP(ce __ _—' _-------_-- Vineyards Equestrian Trail A!TERNATIVE#2 Active Sports Center tball-CouII r.its----Tennis Courts or Other Court Sports� _ _. Picnic Area I_.-I.. __-_-__-I -_-,'{{-.-;+fi!-r--• C -t�1-- l/_�-•J?I I—, _ Soc i Fields r r \.( is t ll Court I I 1 I Refreshments i vouch CentSm er -- I I � J I L__I I I I Games L...—'I- I _ — _ ._.� _ .T I.� :_!-�) •! .E?, 1, Bike and Pedetlriun TPV !I Passive Open Space Vineyards EquesWon Trail ALTRNATIVE#1 T i Museum/Cammunitr Gardens/ u is orFacility 1? I; I1 !I I i iy1�J�t� I I I-1-1 I tlorse Trailer Parking Pu!I Through) - """ Puhlic Warks Maintenance Facility Illi ng( Relocated 1 1 ry ' N1 k Railroad Lar �c� 4iistoric Community Gardens `✓f l=5 d + „���: Museum and Trail Par itg For Office or Museum !`` ) --' •Possible shed or a feature ` r 1'� ,���^�Pq I%� I (� \ 1'.>-�� __I •Raised beds Tmmunif I •Screen views from df angles l!J::3�'�i R.LI_0 •l I.. I_I.I_j..) ` \�•;`�\ \\�', s- �' — • y� •utilize windrow of eucalyptus it • , �` .• , \ Ma bibs shed :1,arden._ _ - - - to - r-- i• � /., \ �. �.`� j __i Water bibs marking-._I •Minimize paving to greatest extent passible -- -- f"*Y:--! "'''` r---• •Mulch/fertilizer location _ -------- Either Euca tut Windrow or Citrus — r-- Museum —7 Equtsrrian`, � ! I (irorn or Usher) I Tran StogirgOrc Iwrd Teets - - --— 11 Area - TLT•=r.V .ri-,. �s ' r� , – t—!--__ _�_y_J ,t � J_ � _J��! i _y�� Bike end Pedestrian Trail ` Passive Open Space Vmvyrds —equestrian Troil } zt1FA7antY.'l�1rLl Railway SVsa6a®n ,�l , • 5cole September 13,2005 1� Scale:1 itieh_AO feet Pacific E I ectr i c Inland Empire, Trail J f Rancho CUCaMo , Pnpand by:Downtown Solirtlans ga�ALTERNfv AVE-3 TIGarlien Sltnce 6 Organic Farm -_--- ----------- 77 J� - - ill I I Subdivision 16716 , fill: 1.-.._•_- �.-_.__ I I I ��1 1 1 I, 11j.. 1 SII 1 � �1 1 I 1 I 111 I�; I � i'll 111 VI ardS — I 1 I'1 , 4 _ Parki .%�'' y t l� 1\�� � Commwity Gardens 17 1 (I i 1 ITi 11 1^ Raised beds �- — rrI 1 I I Maintenance shed -- Vineyard Demonstration Area r+ U ) _ �} L 0_I_l.;J_ Imo!-�.i _Lii"., i�e.F�l:I-; __L.Il!.illi_� _��__�_LI_I_.I ..— a Water bibs �{ Mulch/fertilizer location l— I D Agrculture , t I I Z (hblrP"fit rj i `�I"11 - �' .; ,UI 1,i 1: 1 1•t l�I'� �'11i1 iiti .ti�. (�.j�. —1_ ,(—_'_--- Bike aM edestrlon Tra7 COUl Passive Open Space Vineyards - 1 _ EquesTrianTrail — _ _ Yf - M, 57C 1I 1 I A Grupelund ElemeMaly School Solutions � ��tl 8�d1� �I�'�I�1� ����p®� Date:September 19,2003 Scala:1 inch=40 feet P Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail citj of Rancho Glcamonga— ropend by:DatarmSolutions C9 Qo AR ATIV #1 T'rai ea useum/Lommunity Gardens/ Public ii Subdivision ---..., ---------- ---- Troc1 16715 ---------- I 1 I A l i �•� I I ' , I I I ; 1 � 1 1 I l 1 ', 1 1 . I I I I I I 1• 1 1 1 1 1 1 i'I I 1 Us� VII>eyards I I I I I 'I III 1 1 1 i 1 I I I I _ —_-------------- i I I/ Tin.9 �� J :�?._,{ W ��•lil� . Horse Troller Parks PuIITh htrollRailroad Car ` \ \ 1 —__..___._ l—J I , y Z ••+� IFor Of(ice or. Museum ( 9 ) r Relocated Public Works Maintenance Facility I ' ' )/t�•.�� \t.,�`� 2-c"rie istoCommunity Gardens \[ t.'` I I I N M_LI 1 �'\\ l \�•�, tit .L._ I . •Possible shed or goroge feature"I F I_/. I_LIAJ_ t- .Ralsed beds -Lommun[ty_,< 1 -- \ ` i 7 I •Scn views(rA ` .Maintenance shed Garde 1 •Utilirofeptus(D AD1 II' Museum--- •1—== Equestrian` -"' •Water bibs I�---Parkirg� a Minimise paving to greatest extoll possible Z 4. 11 Troln ar Other H'1^ tTroil Staging /Either Eucalyptus Windrow or Citrus --�) - __ — - e Mulch/fertilizer location '— � _ ,-, L-(___.— ....—__)_ II:I If I Orchard Trees __1 _ — .— Ir'� 1. K fll I1: H .- Area - - _ / _l f ( ( 'j� I;�— 8rkeandPedeslrianTmil �-�� ✓��_�� �}...��J'��.���.� Ul Passive Open Space Vineyards r Jll_--- --- •.� -- Equestrian Troll I� j ti '. r \ j I 1 GropelanJ Elementary School [ r 1 Ef iwande Railway Station � N � � Date:September 1J, 2009' u Scale:1 inch=40 feet ' Prepared by:Downtown Solutions Pacific Electric Inland Empire Trail--CrlaotPQnchoc,u�m,r>c�_ .�:, ,;:' ALTERNATIVE#2 Active Sports Center rte:. ' Subdivision I Tac116716 ------'---- ------- r r- V�neycrds11..--------' .'------ - I ---..... '_..--- I -. .......__.._,', I _ — . ----- -------- -- -- �� Lu Parking -"�"� Tenors Courts or Other Court Sports —.,_aoSTielball Courts_-- _ 12, 2 i I--' - - Picnic Aron - It lam/ i t I �� . j r— � _ 7-- — Jl - ' '—i- �1, !I 1 I j l - ;'_-. -_ .. __ ;, Soccer]'Fields i Restrooms �� 'I !-. +'I r+ (� I Youth Center Smotl Court i(.—� I I =�;I_� Re(restwnents .o_ < - , tib} p q -1 Bike and Pedestrian U7 Passive Open Space Vineyards Equestrlon Troll I- --'-�— ��— •-- —— ------_.. —�—� (..�.Jt`)._�,j L� dV)�• r r � Li`��'�!_ ._"l_�'.'.A_:li_9`-l_,.\._:l�.�l 41 i I Gropelond Elementury School I i f j Efiwands ,allway SWat9®q q w� N Dore:seIncmbfeet3. s r Soak:1 Irtclt="40 feet r. ; Prepared by:oowmown Solutions Pacific E I ect(i c Inland Empire Trail ca,of Aa„&,c,,amonge G Land Use Ideas for Etiwanda Depot Property October 26, 2005 Station Buildin w/Restrooms Rank Use Comment 1 Museum Pacific Electric Railway) Electrical Railroad Historic Society and/or Etiwanda Historic Socie Bike Rental/Repair Private enterprise? Model railroad club Meeting Room For community events, historic society Snack Bar Could be "non-cooking" as part of museum. Alternative: vending machines. Teen Center Day Care Center Private enter rise? Bo /Girl Scout House m Ln w Propert] Rank Use Comment 1 Trailhead/Rest Area for trail users Parking, shade, water fountains, picnic tables, bike racks, hitching posts Artist's Colon w/Studios Live/work studios Citrus / Fruit industry Museum Within Packin House Citrus Grove/ Fruit Orchard Relocate historic grove house Community Garden Master Gardners could run it Garden w/Flower Shop and/or Fruit Stand Private enterprise? . Historic District (repository for homes Relocate historic Etiwanda buildings Red Car on track Could be part of Tot Lot/Playground. Tot Lot/Playground Train Ride miniature train Similar to Balboa Park— Electric Railway Historical Society? City Yard —Auxiliary Site Materials storage, plant nursery 1APlANNINGDAMPadfic EledriclEtiwanda Station\Land Use Ideas for Etlwanda Depot Property.doc NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING , Notice is hereby given that the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Monday, November 14,2005,6:00 p.m. in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of: Discussion of Etiwanda Depot Property Adioining Planning Area. 1 De-bra J. Adams,CMC, City Clerk November 9, 2005 Item E —54 DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on November 9, 2005, 1 posted a true and correct copy of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Agenda dated November 14, 2005 at 6:00 p.m., to be held in the Rains Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 9, 2005 in Rancho Cucamonga. AA- Debra J. Ad s!City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —55 ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE I vcxo TASK FORCE AGENDA CuccoNGA MARCH 309 2005 -- 4:00 P.M. Civic Center-Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Williams , Alexander , McPhail Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS j This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEIVI(S) FOR DISCUSSION �. 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING-­ This . This is the time for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting,only identified for the next meeting. �- E. ADJOURNMENT I, Lois Schrader, Planning Department Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday, March 29, 2005, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. - 1 ate' Item E —56 T H E C I T Y O F RANCf{ O CUCAMONGA Staff Report DATE: March 30,.2005 TO: Members of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force FROM: Brad Buller, City Planner SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 The applicant, Cal Coast Homes, LLC, has requested to meet with the Task Force to present a proposal for age restricted, 55 years and older, for sale condominium housing within Planning Area 3 of the Etiwanda/Base Line Study area. Attached is a map of the area to be discussed. The applicant intends to provide additional exhibits and a detailed proposal at the meeting for the consideration of the Task Force. Respectfully Submitted, Br City Planner BB:Is Attachment: Map of Planning Area 3 Item E —57 - + FM11Wl Rfl610f MTr,I \'`\ V v Is '\ • M•NYMRY ra�iw°•ri Y[t•W [JnY wi�v4tt � • y.Q�'' � �u',•ewiu.•N••w� Mrd.i� I, E1(NIIHO RflflgflNTIK e[•e 1 _ m � - _ VUSIMCOUMERCM I :r. ms ACV c UNE Yrs• \, SITE STUDY VK;TORLA PARK PLACE .+..w wwN•.+4 CAL[:OAST HOMES,LLC WYM M•tsn ke+i•ae.UP 9 FAANCHORHO ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 TASK FORCE AGENDA C. ONGh MAY 309 2007 - 4:00 P.M. Civic Center—Tapia Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call:. Kurth .Williams Munoz Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. DISCUSSION OF DRC2007-00192 - APPLICATION OF BOBBY A'S RESTAURANT, CONFERENCE CENTER, AND POST OFFICE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD PLACE D. ADJOURNMENT 1, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday, May 29, 2007, twenty-four (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. EXHIBIT D Item E -59 O . R A N C H O C U C A M 0 N G A ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT Memorandum DATE: May 23, 2007 TO: Base Line/Etiwanda Historic Study Task Force FROM: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: BOBBY A'S RESTAURANT, CONFERENCE CENTER, AND POST OFFICE AT ." THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD PLACE Members of the task force, J The above-noted application was submitted as a Pre-Application Review on March 13,.2007. It was reviewed by the Planning Commissioners at a workshop conducted after their meeting on March 28, 2007.. I have attached the following documents for your review and discussion of the above-noted application. M S/Is Exhibit A:. Planning Commission Workshop Minutes Exhibit B: Aerial photo Exhibit C: Etiwanda Specific Plan land use table (with applicable zoning district highlighted) Exhibit D: Site Plan and architectural renderings C: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director Item E —60 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES Adjourned Meeting 9 March 28, 2007 Vice-Chairman Fletcher called the Adjourned Meeting.of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga ..Planning Commission to order at 8:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room. ROLL.CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Lou Munoz, Cristine McPhail ABSENT: Pam Stewart STAFF PRESENT: James R. Troyer, Planning Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Mike Smith, Associate Planner New Business A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2007-00192- ROBER M. ATTYAH - A restaurant . conference center and post office on a 4:88 acre property.,located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street-APN: 1100-031-07. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, introduced the item and gave an overview of the proposed project that consists of a community center, restaurant, and a post office. He also described the immediate vicinity including the surrounding.land uses. He provided a brief historyof the Etiwanda Gardens Banquet facility which has facilities for'. receptions; banquets, and weddings. Their use was classified in the same category as churches according to a Use Determination that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in late 2000. Therefore, the proposed community center at the applicant's location would be classified similarly, subject to the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed restaurant with the drive-up "car hop" service (Bobby A's) is equivalent of drive-in, walk-up, and drive through services provided at a fast food restaurant. Fast food restaurants are not allowed in the Office Professional District. Mr. Smith pointed out that an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan would be required in order to allow this use. Mr. Smith described some of the design and site layout observations. Relocating the main building housing the community center and restaurant from its current location at the center of the property to an area closer to the street was discussed briefly. Also, situating the post office closer to Etiwanda Avenue instead of behind the main building was proposed. Secondary topics included a need for more intensive landscaping and . enhanced pedestrian access. Mr. Smith noted a few architectural elements that must be incorporated to remain faithful to the design standards of the City and as outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. As the applicant was represented by several persons familiar with the Etiwanda Community and the City's standards in general, Mr. Smith noted that no further discussion on the topic was necessary. He concluded by pointing out that there was a previously approved office project at this location would have proven to be a very good fit for this site. Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March 28, 2007 EXHIBIT A Item E —61 ......... Brad Buller, representing the applicant, briefly described the project. He noted.that the previously approved project was not financially feasible for the property owner and that this project was one they thought would "work." .He stated that he did not believe that the project was contrary to the intent of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and, more precisely, it's O restrictions on. fast food restaurants because this project was not a typical fast food restaurant like Taco Bell. Architecturally, the project is 'an attempt to recreate the feel of the type'of structure that would be found in the Etiwanda Community such as an old barn or winery. Mr. Buller acknowledged the City's design standards and .indicated that the applicant would be willing to comply with the applicable architecture requirements. Bobby Attyah, the applicant and potential owner of the property, pointed out that this was not a fast food restaurant. He stated that his goal is to re-create the restaurant experience of the 50's and 60's. He said his customers would be.families and travelers. He stated that there would be full service in the restaurant while those who preferred car hop service would get a more casual experience. The community center would be tailored to. fit the needs of local businesses and sports teams. Lastly, there would be a small retail area.for selling restaurant related memorabilia. Mr. Attyah indicated that this.would be the first in a chain of restaurants. Commissioner McPhail stated that she liked the concept but not at this location as it is a heavy residential area and the neighbors would likely be opposed to it. Furthermore, she felt that the restaurant was not the right land 'use in the Etiwanda Community. . She had concerns.about the overall site layout believing the main building and post office should be located closer to Etiwanda Avenue and the dominance of the parking lot should be reduced. She stated that this project should be reviewed by the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Commissioner Macias agreed with Ms. McPhail stating the location of the post office isnot good. He liked the car hop concept but.not at this location. He questioned the visibility of the site; as the site is below the elevation of the adjacent freeway's.road surface and tall pylon signs are not permitted, the restaurant may not successfully attract customers. He felt the architecture was bold. Commissioner Munoz liked the concept. He thought it was.bold but, like Mr. Macias, did not think it would be very visible. Like Ms. McPhail, although he liked the concept, he questioned its suitability here and thought it should be reviewed by the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Vice-Chairman Fletcher thought this use was not appropriate at this location. He thought it was an odd combination of uses. Like the others, he did not think the post office should be situated at the rear of the site. He questioned .the architecture's consistency with the Etiwanda Community. He thought.the former project was a better concept. He agreed with Ms. McPhail that there would likely be community opposition'to this project. The applicant thanked.the Commissioners for their input. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:00 p.m. Page 2 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March 28, 2007 Item E —62 Respectfully submitted, ?mes R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: April 11,2007 Page 3 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March 28, 2007 Item E —63 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II Chapter S ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (ESP) USE DISTRICT NC FC _. ...GC OP Administrative,business,and professional offices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Ambulance services .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - C C Antique shops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �P -� P - Amusement enterprises such as fairs, merry-go-rounds, Ferris wheels or. carousels,and similar uses operated on a temporary basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C - C - Apparel stores . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . P - P - Art and artist's supply.stores P - P P Art galleries and stores selling objects of art . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ... . . . . . . . . . P P - Automobile rental agencies - P P - Automobile repairs (major engine work, muffler shops, painting, body work, and upholstery) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - = C - Automobile sales and service agencies. .:. P P - Automobile supply stores . . . . . . ... . . . . P P P - Automobile upholstery and top shops - P - Automobile washing, including use of. mechanical conveyors, blowers, and steam cleaners ... . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - C C - Automobile washing, self-service . . . ... . C C C - Bakeries, baking of items for sale on premises only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Barber shops and beauty shops . . . . . . . P - P P Bicycle shops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P' - Blueprint and photocopy,services P - P P Book stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P C Bowling alleys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - P Business and office services . . . . . . . . . P - P P 5-13 8/94 EXHIBIT C Item E -65 _.:... ..._. ..... ..:_._... ' J Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter 5 USE DISTRICT NC FC . GC OP Camera and . photography shops and studios ... . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Candy stores and confectionaries .:, P Carpet and rug sales and installation : . . P - P - Catering services .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - China and glassware stores . . . . . . . . . . P - P Christmas tree sales lots operated on a temporary basis . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Churches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C - C C Cigar stores and smoke shops . . . . . . . . P - P C Cleaning establishments and laundries, self-service or coin-operated . . . . . . . . . P P P - Cleaning and laundering services and pick'-up agencies without bulk cleaning P P P - Cocktail lounges . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . C - . C - Commercial recreation indoor facilities. _ - _ (bowling,theaters, billiards) . . P Curtain and.drapery shops . . . . . . . . . . . P P - Delicatessens and specialty food stores P - P C .Department stores,junior . . . . . . . . . . . . C - - Drug stores and pharmacies P - P P Electrical -equipment sales and repair shops . . . . . . . . . - - P Electronic parts and equipment sales . . P P P - Equipment rental agencies with no outside storage . . . . P P P - Financial institutions, including banks, savings and loan associations, finance companies, and credit unions . . . . ... . . . P P P . Floor coverings shops ... . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P Florists . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . . . . P P P P Food stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P Furniture repair and upholstery shops . . - - P Furniture stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P P - i Gift shops and greeting card shops , . . . P - P P 5-14 8/8/94 Item E —66 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part LI, Chapter.S USE -DISTRICT NC FC GC OP Glass replacement and repair shops . . . - - P Hardware stores and home improvement centers . . . . . . - Heating and ventilating shops, not including sheet metal fabrication . . . . . . - - P' - Hobby shops. P P - P - Hotels and motels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - P P - Household.-appliance sales and repair shops ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Ice cream stores and soda fountains . . . P - P Interior decorating shops . . . . . . . . . . P P C Janitorial services and supplies . . . . ... . P - P Jewelry stores . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Leather goods and luggage stores . . . . . P - P - Linen supply services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - P - _ Liquor stores . . . . . . :. . . . C C - Locksmiths . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . P. = P Medical and dental offices and clinics C P P Messenger services . . . . . . . . . . . : . . : . P P P Mortuaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... - P C Motorcycle sales and services . . . . . . - P P Music and dance studios P - P P_ . Music stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - Musical instrument repair shops . . . . . . P - P - Nurseries and garden supply stores in a building & fully screened enclosure with no fertilizer products in bulk form . . . . . . P P P - Nurseries and garden supply stores . . . - P P Office and business machine stores . . . P - P _ Office supply stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P P Optician and optometrical shops P - P ... P Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores . . . . . P - P _ Pet and bird stores.. . . . . . . . . . . . . .`. . . P - P _ 5-15 8/94 Item E -67 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part 11, Chapter S O • USE DISTRICT NC FC GC OP Phonograph record stores . . . . . . . . . . . 'P - P - Photographic developing and printing . . P P P - Pinball and electronic games arcades .: C C.. Printing, publishing, lithography, and engraving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - P Private recreation buildings, or facilities C -, C Public utility or public service-structures ,. and installations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . •C - P - Radio; stereo, and television sales and repair . . . ... . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . , P - P - Realtors and real estate offices . . . . . . . P ., P P P Restaurants with incidental serving of beer and wine, but without a cocktail lounge, bar,.entertainment, or dancing . . . . . . . . P P P P Restaurants having drive-in, drive- through, or walk-up service . . . . . . . . . . C P P - Restaurants, cocktail lounges, bars, dancing,or other establishments providing. live entertainment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C. C. - Secretarial services . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P. P Service or gasoline stations (including minor repair such as tune=ups, brakes, batteries, tires, mufflers) . . . . ... . . . . . . . C P P C Shoe stores and shoe repair shops . . . . P - P - Sporting goods stores . . . . . . • . . . . P - P -Stationery stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P, p p - Swimming pool service and sales P - P ' Tailor shops . . ... . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . :. . P - P _ Theaters and auditoriums within buildings - - P P Toy stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . P - P - Travel agencies and bureaus . . . . . :. . . P. - P P Typewriters ales&service establishments P variety stores . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . P - ..P - 5-16 8194 Item E —68 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part H,, Chapter 5 USE DISTRICT 1% NC FC GC OP Veterinarian's offices and small animal . hospitals, including short term boarding of animals and. incidental care such as bathing and trimming,with all operations conducted within a building which is completely enclosed, soundproofed, and air conditioned .. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P Watch and clock repair shops . . . . : . . P -r P - Wholesale business establishments without warehousing or distribution - - P - Yardage goods stores . . . . . . . . . P -. P - .300 Common Provisions Applicable to All Commercial and Office Districts The following regulations shall apply in all Commercial and.Office Districts: .301 Parking and Loading: Off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided for each use-as prescribed in the Development Code. .302 Signs: No sign, outdoor advertising structure, or display of any'type shall be permitted except as prescribed in Article 5.25.406 and the.City Sign Ordinance. .303 Service Areas, Refuse Collection Areas, and Trash Bins: All service areas, refuse collection areas, and trash bins shall be completely screened by a solid wall or fence not less than 6 feet in height, or shall be enclosed within a building. Exterior trash bin enclosures shall be constructed to conform to City specifications. .304 Exterior Lighting: Exterior lighting shall be arranged or shielded in such a manner as to contain the direct illumination on the site and to avoid glare in nearby residential areas. .305 Exterior Mechanical Equipment: All exterior mechanical, heating, and air conditioning equipment shall be screened from view. . .306 Business Activities, Services, and Processes: ® 5-17 . 4/96 Item E —69 I RESIDENIIAI I RESIDENTIAL •< ;,�^o n.mom CANDLE CaNOIE_w000SIREEI % rll Aft•r !s' m Q I o 6. PARIIWGCDUNIS °n�! o it 2--` PAVO V. i i I ViPED cl MSIM BURDAD ING PI I �:���.�34_� ���• �::y:�: � �'':t�:i�' V' �' '�' 'i'� „ FUTURE ! _. :y]�;.- :.:' �/;.� •.j M 4 BUROWG SIZE EXISIING i i i �� LSU �•., — I P.D. I I i ,� l% Sllf PIAN AS_ SITE PIAN A R A N C H O C U C A M O N G A PLANNING DEPARTMENT Memorandum DATE: May 23, 2007 . TO: Base Line/Etiwanda Historic Study Task Force FROM: Mike Smith, Associate Planner SUBJECT: BOBBY A'S RESTAURANT, CONFERENCE CENTER, AND POST OFFICE AT ' THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD PLACE Members of the task force, The above-noted application was submitted as a Pre-Application Review on March 13, 2007. It was reviewed by the Planning Commissioners at a workshop conducted after their meeting on March 28, 2007. I have attached the following documents for your review and discussion of the above-noted application. MS/Is Exhibit A: Planning Commission Workshop Minutes Exhibit B: Aerial photo Exhibit C: Etiwanda Specific Plan land use table (with applicable zoning district highlighted) Exhibit D: Site Plan and architectural renderings C: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director Item E —71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION WORKSHOP MINUTES QAdjourned Meeting March 28, 2007 Vice-Chairman Fletcher called the Adjourned Meeting .of the City of Rancho. Cucamonga .Planning Commission to order at 8:00 p.m. The meeting was held in the Rains Room. ROLL.CALL COMMISSIONERS: PRESENT: Richard Fletcher, Rich Macias, Lou Munoz, Cristine McPhail ABSENT: Pam Stewart STAFF PRESENT: James R. Troyer, Planning Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Mike Smith, Associate Planner New Business A. PRE-APPLICATION REVIEW DRC2007-00192- ROBER M. ATTYAH - A restaurant- conference. estaurant,conference. center .and post office .on a. 4.88 acre property. located southeast of the intersection of Etiwanda Avenue and Candlewood Street-APN: 1100-031-07. Mike Smith, Associate Planner, introduced the item and gave an overview of the proposed project that consists of a community center, restaurant; and a post office. He also described the immediate vicinity including the surrounding land uses. He provided a brief history of the Etiwanda Gardens Banquet facility which has facilities for receptions, banquets, and weddings. Their use was classified in the same category as churches according to a Use Determination that was reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission in late 2000. Therefore, the proposed community center at'the .applicant's location would be classified similarly, subject to the review and approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed restaurant with the drive=up "car hop" service (Bobby A's) is equivalent of drive-in, walk-up, and drive through services provided at a fast food restaurant. Fast food restaurants are not allowed -in the Office Professional District. Mr. Smith pointed out that an amendment to the Etiwanda Specific Plan would be required in order to allow this use. Mr. Smith described some of the design and site. layout observations. Relocating the main building housing the community center and restaurant from its current location at the center of the property to an area closer to the street was discussed briefly. Also, situating the post office closer to Etiwanda Avenue instead of behind the main building was proposed. Secondary topics included a need- for more intensive landscaping and . enhanced pedestrian access. Mr. Smith noted a few architectural elements that must be incorporated to remain faithful to the design standards of the City and as outlined in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. As the applicant was represented by several persons familiar with the Etiwanda Community and the City's standards in general, Mr. Smith noted that no further discussion on the topic was necessary. He concluded by pointing out that there was a previously approved office project at this location would have proven to be a very good fit for this site. Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March.28, 2007 EXHIBIT A _....:...:.. Item E -72 - Brad Buller, representing the applicant, briefly described the project. He noted that the previously approved project was not financially feasible for the property. owner and that this project was one they thought would "work." He stated that he did not believe that the project was.contrary to the intent,of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and, more precisely, it's restrictions on. fast food restaurants because this project was not a typical fast.food restaurant like Taco Bell. Architecturally, the project is an attempt to recreate the feel of the type of structure that would be found in the Etiwanda Community such as an old barn or winery. . Mr, Buller acknowledged the City's design standards and .indicated that the applicant would be willing to comply with the applicable architecture requirements. Bobby Attyah, the applicant and potential owner of the property; pointed out that this was not a fast food restaurant. He stated that his goal is to re-create the restaurant experience of the 50's and 60's. He said his customers would be families and travelers. He stated that there would be full service in the restaurant while those who preferred car hop service would get a more casual experience. The community center would be tailored to fit the needs of local businesses and sports teams. Lastly, there would be a small retail area for selling restaurant related memorabilia. Mr. Attyah indicated that this would be the first in a chain of restaurants. Commissioner McPhail stated that she liked the concept but not at this location as it is a heavy residential area and the neighbors would likely be opposed to it. Furthermore, she felt that the restaurant was not the right land use in the Etiwanda Community. . She had concerns about the overall site layout believing the main building and post office should be located closer to Etiwanda Avenue and the dominance of the parking lot should be reduced. She stated that this project should be reviewed by the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Commissioner Macias agreed with Ms. McPhail stating the location of the post office is not good. He liked the car hop concept but not at this location. He questioned the visibility of the site; as the site is below the elevation of the adjacent freeway's road surface and tall pylon signs are not permitted, the restaurant may not successfully attract customers. He felt the architecture was bold. Commissioner Munoz liked the concept. He thought it was bold but, like Mr. Macias, did not think it would be very visible. Like Ms. McPhail, although he liked the concept, he questioned its suitability here and thought it-should, be reviewed by the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force and the Etiwanda Historical Society. Vice-Chairman Fletcher thought this use was not appropriate at this location. He thought it was an odd combination.of uses.. Like the others, he did not think the post office should be situated at the rear of the site. He questioned the architecture's consistency with the Etiwanda Community. He thought the formerproject was a better concept. He agreed with Ms. McPhail that there would likely be community opposition to this project. The applicant thanked the Commissioners for their input. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 9:00 p.m. • Page 2 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March 28, 2007 . Item E —73 Respectfully submitted, 0 ?m*es R. Troyer, AICP Secretary Approved: April 11, 2007 _J Page 3 Planning Commission Workshop Minutes March 28, 2007 _ .: . . Item E —74 NOW. q d x Art fs,+ .? {^" i2 t vp a+ e g j�}t�` .+Y s ft,r I `" SyE �•^11 C' R v'nFr=h 4 `'' ' '°��'{$ 9 �'�' �!`. `r ����� ' � g`t 1•ar`1, ,,^r7i � 3 ,'h- a rryb+ i-. $G i f '� - L'�A w�' y„a�42j1' i3 .r�r~v�. �'#Py !�v, r}}'ui>^ Niru t-' Lam. a(` ,• p t �q. Y+ � ���Y zrx. '�.y!�Y k 1Ir y>•Y,g6`Af'`e]rY"''Er �U �s�i ,. r ;y> . is v` � :fir C� l.. is c��-ti�K� ,jF•. � z}. ;�'�['r a�{'r "`��Sz ° °y arm �.�`a*;{ n� * .n �'Ux �'� }.��,5 y�>'t��itTr d fi? d fit� +i•., v '.:s til ° `G;✓"5` E'�xP,d�� j3�Fer)I f✓w`+ ''r - t 1 6 Y 'a. t'� Yj �! t"4�k rl7:. !a��-• f C i k'� 1v°' L J.i cie' fl��• E i blit toy' 7 r ty,� IN + 4r�,y R &+:. S'.it..�i 91T > - h3i✓d P"' q L .1 ��w FyN.s' �'� yd a. 4 On ',; ..rN>. z .n i S � '�°'v't! " '' rYn""Sr"* "c.7ift 'db a• aS x'' Vol, Erivar. 15{is f - lu'G'ra7 Yy,� iw�:a�tArrtuy'rr 5..n6`Y rx is �� �*'"� ti` �� x• � �,;n ��ry� �yr t `_9' kk��jam,r.q5 L � �� I !k2 w �7: r41'x��r,'I�� 1 �+€ R„iy a?a �` - e` X' '+ '�• ill S'H--1 T "—P{jI�,4�,� .1.. ' ., �``� � r �'✓ N� �o # N L'da TPx '�1f s � A t�� "�^^� r•'xt i .R'"'t' K ` , -: �7 it�"�g �2`�`£1``v�^'1$(I ey, w � '�r Y��� ��n5r>?A- y'� eH, >i :� ,�-gL' '�'$ ils `t}^ yy�-"•{'.�M •,� � ri.'",.,.;-,: MI �. kCy'C-�M+.ri RE" r.,i,a �u �^r t v F �"�7�It.� *yi}' a� $.' h' Imp- 1s ' T ,yt; F1 �ddd�i5' 3Lrr`k5 •'& 4 yy ti �f 3 } } i �Y "� r 127 i+' of 1:r a ! ,�B ;r;.,� W Pr?.a,q .t•.,.J.�P { c 3 '.�'��.+5'� �,� i��I�"r F,3:i'��D.�^� Fr -• �'»` v 's �9r .'fir <.r it ,F ('�h' 1 t. 6 f;ai� s w:+c �,T I }yyt„�S,it�"Ft 13Q— :.® 5 n �- �,A f`,�'1:4srr'y �.,`� A�!� (tr" v7Jt- y i yS Z r .1 i i1 ♦ {-y kRYfl ';A, h+' 8' �N`•%�n�i-8 � t,1s � Y.. +luY s �r !.�"'��.smfxt x I I�:bli N�w�,rt"4:: til.{ r"+, ; w,s°'a it '�. 'E �irsSi 7t Fra r r 6 (k���S w t;T 4 k° �v, `lY 1 ��ryv yyy+�if' t4 n.� PY �� ���.al("+�,,,�-s$+`�r Y'. by tic r aTMk. it ��Y' >•`z�+ #ks' i,r�'�+i` J r r�r T 4' PPP a 4,a. }' ,yj 3 xgvGtT 41ki�r Y'"' 4 yt r4 i. <�c it �y t6'I i EI "ZA >,Z "k44. s� - .- r l 3 ki � i hF y r i4� � '4'A t� CC��k�� a � L•h e y r r ;� n b,�F'�T' � ?y „ ' e� C'r -in 'I Z•rt� Is f>.Fr`t gNJ'i r`�' y'L+I l� r1. 1 y#Sx�..�g 0x>+iiC�' 9 I YP 4iw Fts X41 p "'4 t Y L I n e drd'r Etiwanda Specific Plan Part II, Chapter S 0 ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN (ESP) USE DISTRICT .NC FC GC OP Administrative,business,and professional offices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Ambulance services.. . . . . . . . . . . . - - C C Antique shops . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P -� P - Amusement enterprises such as fairs, merry-go-rounds,- .Ferris wheels or, carousels,and similar uses operated on a -temporary basis .F . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .0 - C - Apparel stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Art and artist's supply,stores . . . . . . . P - P P Art galleries and stores selling objects of art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Automobile rental agencies - P P - Automobile repairs (major engine work, muffler shops, painting, .body work, and upholstery) . . C Automobile sales and service agencies - P P - Automobile supply stores . . . . . . ... . . . . P P P - Automobile upholstery and top shops - P - Automobile washing, including use of mechanical conveyors, blowers, and steam cleaners . . . . . . . . . . . - C C - Automobile washing, self-service . . . . . . C C C Bakeries, baking of items for sale_ on premises only . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Barber shops and beauty shops . . . . . P - P P Bicycle shops . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . P - P - Blueprint and photocopy services . . P - P P Book stores . . . . . P - P C Bowling alleys . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P Business P P I office services . . . . . . . . . P 5-13 8194 EXHIBIT C Item E —76 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part IT Chapter S USE DISTRICT NCFC GC OP .Camera and photography shops and studios ... . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Candy stores and confectionaries_ . . . . . P . ._:. .. _. - P.. - Carpet and rug sales and installation . . . P - P - Catering services. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - China and glassware stores . . . . . . . . . . P - P Christmas tree sales lots operated on a temporary basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Churches C - C C Cigar stores and smoke shops . . ... . . . . P - P C Cleaning establishments and laundries, self-service or coin-operated . . . . . . . . . P P P. - Cleaning and laundering services and pick'-up agencies without bulk cleaning P P P - Cocktail lounges . ... . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . C - . C - Commercial recreation indoor facilities �. (bowling, theaters, billiards) . . . . . . . . . . - - P Curtain and drapery shops . . : . . . . . . . . P - P Delicatessens and specialty food stores P - P C Department stores,junior . . . . . . . . . . . . C Drug stores and pharmacies . . . . . . . . . P - P P Electrical 'equipment sales and repair shops - - P - Electronic parts and equipment sales . . P P P - Equipment rental agencies with no outside storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . ...... . . . P P P Financial institutions, including banks, savings and loan associations, finance companies, and credit unions . . . . . . . . .` P - P P Floor coverings shops ... . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P = Florists . . . . . . . . . . . P P P P Food stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Furniture repair and upholstery shops . . - - P - Furniture stores P - P - Gift shops and greeting card shops . . . . P - P P 5-14 8/8/94 Item E —77 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part U Chapter S OUSE DISTRICT NC FC GC OP Glass"replacement and repair shops -. - P - ..- Hardware stores and home improvement centers P _P _ - Heating and ventilating shops, not including sheet metal fabrication . . . . . . - - P Hobby shops ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P M. - Hotels and motels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - P P - Household appliance sales and repair shops . . . . . . . . P - P - Ice cream stores and soda fountains . . . P = P - Interior decorating shops ... . . . ... . . . . . P - P C Janitorial services and supplies . . ... . . . P - P _ Jewelry stores . . . . ... . . P - P - Leather goods and luggage stores . . . . . P - P - Linen supply services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P - Liquor stores . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . C - C - ?� Locksmiths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Medical and dental offices and clinics . . C - P P Messenger services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Mortuaries - - P C Motorcycle sales and services . . . . . . . . - P P - Music and dance studios . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P Music stores . P = P - Musical instrument repair shops . . . . . . P P - Nurseries and garden supply stores in a building or fully screened enclosure with no fertilizer products in bulk form . . . . . . P P P - Nursedes and garden supply stores - P P - Office and business machine stores . . P - P - Office supply stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P P Optician and optometrical shops . . . . . . P - P -• P Paint, glass, and wallpaper stores . . . . . P - P - Pet and bird stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - 5-15 8/94 Item E —78 _ ...:. ....::., :.:.... .. . .: ..... Etiwanda Specific Plan Part H,, Chapter 5 USE DISTRICT NC FC GC OP Phonograph record stores . . . . . . . . . . .. P P- - Photographic developing and printing . . P P P - Pinball and electronic games arcades ....0 C Printing, publishing, lithography, and engraving . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . - - P - Private recreation buildings, or facilities C C - Public utility.or public service structures r, and installations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . C - P - Radio, stereo, and television sales and repair . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . P - P _ Realtors and real estate offices . . . . . . . P P P P Restaurants with incidental serving of beer and wine, but without a cocktail lounge, bar, entertainment, or dancing . . . . . . . . P P P P Restaurants having drive-in, drive- through, or walk-up service . . . . . . . . . . C P P - Restaurants, cocktail lounges, bars, dancing,or other establishments providing.4 - live entertainment . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C C C Secretarial services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P P Service or gasoline stations (including minor repair such as tune=ups, brakes, . batteries, tires, mufflers Shoe stores and shoe repair shops . . . . P - P - Sporting goods stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P Stationery stores P - P P Swimming pool service and sales . . . . . P - P - Tailor shops . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P Theaters and auditoriums within buildings - - P P Toy stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - Travel agencies and bureaus . . . . . . . . . P - P P Typewriter sales&service establishments P - P P Variety stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P - P - 5-16 8/94 Item E -79 Etiwanda Specific Plan Part 11, Chapter S OUSE DISTRICT NC FC GC . OP Veterinarian's offices and small animal hospitals, including short term boarding of animals and incidental care such as bathing and trimming;-with all operations conducted within a building which is completely enclosed, soundproofed, and air conditioned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - P - Watch and clock repair shops . . . . . : . . P -r P - Wholesale- business establishments without warehousing or distribution - - P - Yardage goods stores . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P P - .300 Common Provisions Applicable to All Commercial and Office Districts The following regulations shall apply in all Commercial and Office Districts: .301 Parking and Loading: Off-street parking and loading facilities shall be provided for each use-as prescribed in the.Development Code. .302 Signs: No sign, outdoor advertising structure, or display of any'type shall be permitted except as prescribed in Article 5.25.406 and the City Sign Ordinance. .303. Service Areas, Refuse Collection Areas, and Trash Bins: All service areas, refuse collection areas, and trash bins shall be completely screened by a solid wall or fence not less than 6 feet in height;or shall be.enclosed within a building. Exterior trash bin enclosures shall be constructed to conform to City specifications. .304 Exterior Lighting: Exterior lighting shall be arranged or shielded in such a manner as to contain the direct illumination on the site and to avoid glare in nearby residential areas. .305 Exterior Mechanical Equipment: All exterior mechanical, heating, and air conditioning equipment shall be screened from view. .306 Business Activities, Services, and Processes: 5-17 4/96 Item E —80 I j i RESIOErvIUI j REHDEN p��wgp I I , _L _ _ _ PNDLE wOpD SIREfl W I --Ep I Oft P091,OifiCE I I �`�' L'/V'<f> �V'�✓ / PAI. �/ ..� ���SYYV� AIN CD I 10 ® ® f I PAR[kMa GGIM6 44 F-- IP/ MEMIW- . - Z F ONG MORE 51 ;1 ••" //` �.. s rr L _- 1 i RD601B0511E 1 f �: 2 •',� �tql --_- -. nM[WG / AS 1 _ SIIEPW! A • � •q��- �'—'-i�ul��lll�l�lllll � ( �I��Ilrl� I IfVlr�l h.l .�t 4 L n ,- �3 � �,�' � I I - .1i,.r•,I` = G. p �•c'� ++Ili�� �,ql ► ,�, "S` ' ►fix=j't 1!i*'� ���r�`' !•..,4�.'�!�� '�-��� ..' �.t �`i--. { �,', i r: l Sty I 1 If� I � � • I. IIIIjIIIb 11�I {I i � } _ III I I�I�'!�I I� I !r� I !II:�!I ,I 3�1• �4 ���IIII�I..I IIII 'I�I !.!III�` I)II II �j, �R /r _�_I_ � L� l•�II� �+ '' +� r N f y.. �Q�w' � � °".o ��AA'��ra• Ilse iA A����������Q�'s .77 !\"��\�0'C �- �� /r � �/ III i .�I I' .r. •�P1'�..t�( �,�1 d i'_ t' + v \\\�1�, `0s 'I iil!��`I,III!III��I A'•� � •1', ......�-:� r��.I _�> ��+i .dam:._ _._ � •` _ 'mss— o d<o+`.��''��,�,.` �� • � y, .��, �� �I Kll,i III III I�� ' i �I' I � l.• ti � ,� al pp f+lam p� �� IIII(, ,�11. 4�.I7 - 'cf K- Y� i_al f'.f:l`•TM •k I + i;}�,iy' \ ,1+M� "���� \���� 1 � I III'! I I • � S � e.G�t Xn 7'i�. �} i ` v I�r �y�, r ,.'��, [5' '' 1'rti } +� . •t �ra,f�l / '� I L"���yl� t�1��at�� 4f�'I �'1 �i1kr+Y.r, f5,..�+�Eye{a �,i��� ���,1 ,a �fy / � �.. -•.tip. : -,(41 _ _ I�, I s •,� 1 � -`�. P� - I ��s-`��` lrlgl`�I�I� �q4,� �I �i,� • �: � �`��t�4`�_..�!`.. II iy ��' rf \ ti♦J'-� i fF 3^ 5 ---�I�, f I I�. I- ,'� � :�GT��i NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Tuesday, May 30,2007,4:00 p.m. in the Tapia Room at the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, for the purpose of- 1. f:1. DISCUSSION OF DRC2007-00192 - APPLICATION OF BOBBY A'S RESTAURANT, CONFERENCE CENTER, AND POST OFFICE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ETIWANDA AVENUE AND CANDLEWOOD PLACE L 4ath n L. Ott, CMC Assistant City Clerk May 29, 2007 Item E -85 n V . DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA Debra J. Adams states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on May 30, at 2:00 p.m., I posted a true and correct copy of the Special Meeting Agenda for the Rancho Cucamonga City Council Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force scheduled for Tuesday, May 30,2007,4:00 p.m. to be held in the Tapia Room at the,Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. O I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on May 30, 2007, at Rancho Cucamonga. DEBRA J. ADAMS, CMC, CITY CLERK City of Rancho Cucamonga BY: Kathryn L. Scott, MC Assistant City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —86 T H E C I T Y O F R A N C H O C U CAM ON CA Fax C®vef Sheet TO: Wendy Leung - Daily Bulletin FAX: 909 948-9038 DATE: 5/24/2007 SUBJECT: ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE AGENDA FROM: Kathryn L. Scott, Asst. City Clerk PHONE: 477-2700 FAX: 909 477-2846 EXT.: 2009 NUMBER OF PAGES: 2 Comments: ATTACHED IS SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA INFORMATION J • Please call the above sender if there are any problems in receiving this transmission. http://www.ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us Item E —87 ETIWANDA/BASE LINE ' HISTORIC STUDY PAGE I TASK FORCE AGENDA. �oNGA JANUARY 179 2007 -- 4:30 P.M. Civic Center—Planning Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga,California 91730 SPECIAL MEETING A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Kurth .Williams , McPhail , Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. C. ITEM(S)t FOR DISCUSSION —� 1. DISCUSSION OF PLANNING AREA 3 — A PROPOSAL FOR 82 CONDO UNITS ON 5.5 ACRES OF LAND D. ADJOURNMENT I, Debra J. Adams, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Tuesday,January 16, 2007, twenty-four(24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Item E —88 Mzlize Page 1 of 1 Fisher, Theresa From: Fisher, Theresa Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 4:20 PM To: Kendrena, Donna Cc: Schrader, Lois Subject: Agenda Info.from Mike Diaz Importance: High Donna, Lois just called with this info. and said that you need it right away. I am also printing a hard copy for your convenience. "A discussion of plan area 3--a proposal for 82 condo units on 5.5 acres of land." Respectfully, Theresa Fisher Office Specialist II City Manager's Office City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Post Office Box 807 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91729 E-Mail: tfisher,@ci.rancho-cucamonga.ca.us Phone: (909)477-2700, ext. 2011 Fax: (909)477-2846 This message and any related attached documents are potentially subject to disclosure tinder public right-to-know regulations. This m6sage is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. !f the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,you are hereby notified that any dissentination,distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. lfyou have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this E-Mail or by telephone. o�isa+�oeo oa�ea aaoaoao��sdaa9�oasoaeoao eaoeaseoaoa oaa4eas a o-e o.eeaoeatoa�Qooe�oafi o • 1/16/2007 Item E -89 DECLARATION OF POSTING OF AGENDA DEBRA J. ADAMS states and declares as follows: I presently am, and at all times mentioned herein have been, the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Acting in that capacity, on January 16, 2007, 1 posted a. true and correct copy of the Special. Meeting Agenda for the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force scheduled for January 17, 2007, 4:30 p.m. to be held in the Planning Conference Room of the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on January 16, 2007, in Rancho Cucamonga. ebra J. ms, CMC, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga Item E —90 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING Notice is hereby given that the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force will hold a special meeting on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, 4:30 in the Planning Conference Room at the Civic Center located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga,.California, for the purpose of: DISCUSSION. OF PLANNING AREA 3 — A PROPOSAL FOR 82 CONDO UNITS ON.5.5 ACRES OF LAND Debra J. AQgv6s, CMC, City Clerk January 16, 2007 Item E -91 T -H E. .C .-I, T .Y O F. . Rn-KCH0 CuCAMONcn Fax Cover Sheet TO: Wendy Leung — Daily Bulletin FAX: (909) 94 -9038 DATE: January 16, 2007 SUBJECT: Special Meeting Notice FROM: Debra J. Adams, City Clerk PHONE: (909) 477-2700 FAX: I (909) 477-2846 EXT.: 2005 NUMBER OF PAGES: Attached is special meeting agenda information. Please call the above sender if there are any problems in receiving this transmission. http://wWw.ci.rancho-cucamonga-ca-us Item E —92 071 ETIWANDA/.BASE LINE . . HISTORIC STUDY PAGE 1 RAxcxo TASK FORCE AGENDA CUCAMONGA JANUARY 15, 2008 -- 5:00 P.M. Civic Center— Planning Conference Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 SPECIAL MEE'rING i A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call: Kurth . Williams , Munoz Stewart B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Task Force from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Task Force may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual. _ _ _ C. ITEM(S) FOR DISCUSSION 1. TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007- 00550 - CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES - A request to change the current land use designation of Low-Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and includes an amendment of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the two parcels located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay District. APN: 0227-131-17&0227-131-39. 2. TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00604 - CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan io change the current Low-Medium Residential District designation of the two parcels located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue to include them in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay and to amend the uses for which a Conditional Use Permit is required to include drugstores with and without a drive-through lane not to exceed 18,000 square feet. APN: 0227-131-17 & 0227-131-39. D. ADJOURNMENT_ I, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Monday, January 14, 2008, twenty-four (24) • hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. EXHIBIT E Item E —93 T H E C I T YO F P A N C H 0 CVCAM0NC.n Stiff Report DATE: January 15, 2008 TO: Members of the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force FROM: James R. Troyer, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007- 00550 - CHARLES JOSEPH &ASSOCIATES -A request to change the current land use designation of Low-Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and includes an amendment of the Etiwanda.Specific Plan for the two parcels located at the northeast comer'of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay District. , APN: 0227-131-17.8 0227-131-39. TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00604 - CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES - A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to change'the current Low-Medium Residential District designation of the two parcels located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue to include them in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay and to amend the uses for which a Conditional Use Permit is required to include drugstores with and without a drive-through Lane not to exceed 18,000 square feet. APN: 0227- 131-17 80227-131-39. The project was discussed at a Planning Commission Workshop held on November 28, 2007. Following the discussion, the Commission directed that the project proposal be directed to the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force for their comment and direction. Attached is a map of the area to be discussed as well as materials used for the discussion at the November 28, 2007 workshop. Respectfully Submitted, . I Ja s R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director Item E —94 J RT:LS Attachment: Map of Planning Areas Map-(Subject of Discussion Area 5 is highlighted) Planning Commission Workshop Sign in Sheet Excerpts from the Etiwanda Specific Plan Conceptual Exhibits of the proposed Etiwanda Marketplace Item E —95 14£t�1 4 i t RaB am �� �i///i �/ - s j]j) )) 5, 'I���IFIAIIIFIIIIIII/III. \ � �� �� jii � €{2ztur:rrxuz( 'iiiiiFFIIIIOIIIIIII/III. y 5 � �-� � � mms.vau9 k a" �� Via_®'• ism.. > {}£s>szssss2 t££{1££s£aE;;ttszssssssss i -powsign 1 11 oil WIN L ..... ...... p �`\\`.�.�-i Vii. � � • � � �:'.i ":Seta: Pox/ 6u . AGf'1IL ✓ v �LiAxle-- screw - 5 . 7 14 . 3r.nom' �fee SmvCtch �ub o �U ►� x, 1 i��, Sea G l qct Ssb S�j3y _ /-V tr1 Ct,% _.. - �� Item E -97 General Plan Amendment Application Etiwanda Marketplace NEC Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, California Uniform Application-Part 1 Proiect Description Attachment Etiwanda Marketplace is conceived as a retail commercial project situated on 1.92 net acres located at the northeast corner of Baseline Road and Etiwanda Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California. The projected building area will be approximately 15,000 -17,000 square feet in a single anchor tenant retail building space with approximately 80 - 85 parking spaces, with significant . landscaping set back in areas on all four property boundaries. Over 32°x6 of the net site area will be devoted to landscaping, 49% to vehicular and parking areas and approximately 18% to building area. OThe retail uses contemplated for Etiwanda Marketplace include a neighborhood drug store and/or a neighborhood. food market operation. The limited land area of the Subject Property dictates that only one anchor tenant will occupy the proposed building area. Applicant is in the process of negotiating a long-term lease commitment with one of several interested neighborhood drug store and neighborhood food market tenant prospects at the time of this General Plan Amendment filing-on the Subject Property. Applicant will file a Conditional Use Permit application as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan as soon as the anchor tenant lease commitment is obtained. The architectural design elements of Etiwanda Marketplace will reflect the goals of the Etiwanda Specific Plan in a comprehensive fashion consistent with the overall framework of the City's General Plan. The proposed site plan, landscape plan, and building architectural design plans are included with the Applicant's General Plan Amendment application documentation. Item E -98 Etiwanda Marketplace Request for General Plan Amendment from Low Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and Specific Plan Amendment from Low Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and Community Service Overlay District of approximately 2.5.acres Location & Request The area.of the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") that is the subject of these applications is the area . . known as "Etiwanda" that is located within "Etiwanda Specific Plan Overlay." Etiwanda Specific Plan Overlay consists of approximately 105-acres that border Etiwanda, bounded by Foothill Blvd to the south, 241h street to the north. The project area project site is an approximate 2-acre parcel assemblage located on the North East Corner of Baseline & Etiwanda, just 200 feet south of the Community Service Overlay District. ("Subject Property"). The project applicant, Marketplace Properties, submits this request to update the General Plan & Specific Plan from Residential LM to Neighborhood Commercial and Convenience commercial (Exhibit A) as well as to incorporate these two parcels of this application (APN 0227-131-17 & 39) into the Community Service Overlay District (Exhibit C). These two parcels currently lay 200' south of the existing Community Service Overlay District which provides for encouragement of community related uses. (a) "Limited or specialized low impact commercial uses not to exceed 40,000 sq,jt. in total area designed to serve local residential areas,such as: • Barber and Beauty Shops • Cleaners • Farmers or specialty markets,not to exceed 18,000 sq.ft.floor area • Professional and Medical Vices • Retail Shops • Restaurants" *The requested amendments will provide for merely the addition of the drugstore use under the provisiot of the Community Service Overlay District along with the underlying-General Plan Land use as well as the specific plan allowances of Conditionally Permitted uses identified above by adding the Convenience Comm unity.Commercial uses to the Subject Property. Our project scope and scale will be under the 18,000 sf floor area threshold designated for Community Service Overlay Districts. History of the Subject Property, Analysis & Supported Findings Prior to incorporation of this parcel into the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the Subject Property was used commercially as a vehicle service station. In the late 1980's during a General Plan update, the City modified the Subject Property's zoning from Commercial to Residential. At this same time-period, the. adjacent Victoria Arbors Community Plan provided commercial zoning opportunities at the northwest corner of Base Line Road and Victoria Park Lane (community commercial uses) and at the northwest comer of Base Line Road and Freeway 15 (office park uses.) Subsequently,.the zoning was changed on the Base Line/Victoria Park Lane property to Residential zoning and the Base Line/Freeway property was acquired by the City for the purposes of a new freeway interchange to better serve the Etiwanda residents. The effect of these zone changes caused the reduction of the available land within the Etiwanda Specific Plan area designated for Community Commercial uses by over 4 acres and a similar amount within the immediately adjacent Victoria Arbors Community planning area. Now there is a gap in commercial retail zoning for uses envisioned in the Etiwanda Specific Plan such as neighborhood food markets and/or neighborhood drug stores. The applicant is seeking the General Plan Amendment to be able to provide such neighborhood community retail services uses on the Subject Property. • . 1 Item E —99 Furthermore, despite the encouragement of the Community Service Ovtrlay District, the only uses that have currently been developed within this District consist of residential, schools, and churches.The. commercial uses proposed by the Applicant, therefore, would not be duplicative and the addition of a neighborhood food market or drug store would provide the Etiwanda residents with the opportunity to \,_.iop locally thereby maintaining consistency with the Etiwanda Specific Plan guidelines. The spirit and intent of this Community Service District Overlay is to provide small scale community. service users to achieve a truly intimate casual neighborhood commercial vision for the area. This concept blends low scale commercial product types into the overall master plan for this area to serve the communities needs. Both the anticipated specialty food market or drugstore users fall within the spirit ,and intent of this overlay. This application will merely provide for the supporting text within the Etiwanda Speck plan to clearly provide for these uses on the Subject Property. The projected building area will be approximately 15,000 -18,000 .square feet in a single anchor tenant retail building space with approximately 80 - 85 parking spaces, with significant landscaping set back in areas on all four property boundaries of which over 32% of the net site area will be devoted to landscaping, 49%to vehicular and parking areas and approximately 18% to building area. The retail uses contemplated for Etiwanda Marketplace include a neighborhood drug store and/or a. neighborhood food market operation which is consistent with the overall goals of this area per. the Community Service Overlay; yet provides for a better location on the hard corner of Baseline & Etiwanda rather than tucked away in-between existing residential. The.limited land area of the Subject Property dictates that only one anchor tenant will occupy the proposed building area and the size and scope of the request limits the potential for increased scale and scope. The applicant is in the process of preparing a neighborhood drug store and/or neighborhood food market tenant Conditional Use Permit application subsequent to this General Plan Amendment filing to run concurrent with this amendment request. ie architectural design elements of Etiwanda Marketplace will reflect the goals of the Etiwanda Specifi Plan in a comprehensive fashion consistent with the overall framework of the City's General Plan. The proposed site plan, landscape plan, and building architectural design plans are included with the Applicant's General Plan Amendment application documentation for reference of the desired scale and scope of the pending project filing. It is important to note that in review of the General Plan and Development District documents that this small portion of property could remain Low Medium Density residential with merely the additional of the Community Service Overlay district and the specialty market would be conditionally permitted. Adding the additional. language for the drugstore use would then bring the Subject Property in compliance with the General Plan and goals of this'Specific Plan Subarea and would be limited only to the subject areas of discussion. Considering that the school and existing residential comprise the majority of the Community Service Overlay district, the subject site would be the only remaining vacant parcel with the ability to utilize such a designation. The approval of the foregoing request will serve to merely integrate the Subject Property into the existing Community Service Overlay District located just 200' north and allow for the desired type of community commercial uses in this area for the Etiwanda residents. This will facilitate the Subject Property's development with an appropriate land use designation actually envisioned by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2 Item E -100 General Plan Exhibits.and Specmc Plan Exhibits.as.Amended Use District NC FC GC OP Drug,stores and pharmacies P - P P with drive thru C Food Stores P - P _ .400 Neighborhood Commercial Provisions .401 Conditional Use Permit required Prior to the development of the Neighborhood Commercial center or any part thereof,approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a master plan for the entire site shall be required. (provided in attached submittal) .502 Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit: (b) Community uses, such as schools,nursery schools, churches, parks,community buildings, band stands, and the like. (c) Residential uses permitted in the LM District. (d) Limited or specialized low impact commercial uses not to exceed 40,000 sq, ft. in total area designed to serve local residential areas, such as:. • Barber and Beauty Shops • • Cleaners • Farmers or specialty markets &drugstores-with or without a drive-thru,not to exceed 18,000 sq. ft. floor area • Professional and Medical Offices • Retail Shops • Restaurants Provide however, that no commercial or office use or project shall be approved in the CS district,unless the following findings are made by the Planning Commission: • The purposed use or project will not have an adverse impact on the quality of surrounding residential areas; and • The purposed use or project meets the intent of the CS District and will enhance the visual and historical character of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings. .303 Conditional Use Permit Required: All proposed developments shall be subject to the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit,except as follows: (a) Single or two family residence developed in accordance with the provisions of the ER or VL Districts. (b) Single family residences constructed on existing legal lots of record. .400 CS/OL—CommunityService Overlay District .401 Purpose: In addition to meeting other provisions of Chapter 3, it is the purpose of the SC/OL District to provide opportunities for limited or specialized, low-impact commercial and quasi-commercial services in a residential area,with the express intent to: 3 Item E —101 (a) Provide a community focal point in the heart of Etiwanda,to (b) Reinforce a sense of community identity,and to (c) Encourage perpetuation of those elements and features which provide a tie to Etiwanda heritage. 102 CS/OL District Boundaries: The provisions of this article shall apply to all land located within the area identified in Figure 5-5, between Victoria:Avenue and a line 860 feet south of the Southern Pacific Railroad. .403 Permitted Uses: All uses permitted in the Base District. .404 Conditional Uses The following uses shall be permitted subject to the granting of a Conditional Use Permit: • Uses conditionally permitted in the Base District • Community uses, such as schools,nursery schools, churches,parks, community buildings, band stands, and the like • Limited or specialized, low impact commercial services designed to serve local residential areas, such as: Barber and Beauty Shops Farmers Markets Professional and Medical Offices Restaurants • Provide however that no commercial of office use or project shall be approved in the CS/OL District, unless the following findings are made by the Planning Commission. The proposed use or project will not have an adverse impact on the quality of surrounding residential areas, and The proposed use or project meets the intent of the SC/OL District and will enhance the visual and historical character of Etiwanda Avenue and its immediate surroundings. '� � Chrrrdr � Cammnni nercire Distrdct&ounrar4 , Schoa! �� 1 �� � .1�Ri^S k i . ill: f• R}y--. - �y^ LC yir{ �r rflery inpynglrtOO ?U7? 4 _ � 11 I 4 Item E —102 I� j�.";. ✓:;, / •'�.'sir-...'.�;i;,r. .;/=. ,•�t• l"f' ., .•• XlGTOR1. ` . �*, I vcCt�lSc afg f sic — Aaek--n .fit ka=. . spacial studies a, �. i ; Overlay ®istact ISeksnt10 • aua d 4 bctlwands Avenue . .� __ __ Overlay District i ` Community Service Overlay ®isidet (r•rFjq s-si Equest Overlay rIanrict r _. - .iw'.'a...�. . j <• ' Eoothi.0 b1tvd- S.P. tMe figure' K� VERI.AY 5-4' DISTRICTS Area to be annexed into Community Services District 6 Item E -103 .............. '5 .................... rt 2.5 TRENDS Etiwanda has retained its unique rural atmosphere primarily due to its E- location within the .community and lack of public services provided. Past developmental pressures experienced within the communities of Alta Loma and Cucamonga . have. left Etiwanda.. relatively unaffected by urban development. However, Etiwanda's present condition will ultimately be challenged by new development. Strong outside influences, which include the Victoria and Terra Vista planned communities to the west, the City's f. industrial area to the south, and Fontana to the east will ultimately bring urban services and utility connections into, close proximity. It would appear G that as urban services and, utilities become available, the number of development proposals in Etiwanda will increase. Thus, it seems apparent that some form of change will eventually occur within the planning,area. The y! trends, opportunities, and potential problems are outlined below. is TRENDS: Pressure to develop at or above currently planned levels. Pressure to develop in a piecemeal fashion. Pressure to develop substantial commercial facilities at locations most (f beneficial for business purposes. Tendency to develop projects based totally on criteria used city-wide. Tendency to split land holdings and to subdivide for interim use. Tendency to phase out existing agricultural uses. These trends, if not dealt with effectively, could create a number of potential problems. However, with proper planning, those elements that make Etiwanda unique also create opportunities to solve such problems in a manner that takes advantage of existing conditions to the benefit of the community as a whole. f POTENTIAL PROBLEMS: Circulation Dramatic increase in vehicular traffic on both major and local streets in existing residential and other sensitive areas. Increase in noise.levels in sensitive areas. Potential safety hazards due to conflicts with pedestrians, bicycles, and horses. Community Eventual loss of existing and historical character through: Character -widening of existing streets, such as Etiwanda, East.and Victoria Avenues; -loss of rock curbs; -loss of windbreaks and other mature vegetation; -removal of older but historically and aesthetically valuable buildings'- -intrusion of through traffic and associated problems; -construction of .new development inconsistent with local character and unique qualities; -construction of new development based totally on city-wide standards; -eventual disapearance of Etiwanda'sseparate identity. 2-5 Item E -105 1 ! '•� ' Commercial Substantial impact of commercial development on existingr Services other sensitive areas. Potential esidential and inappropriate traffic resulting from locating major traffic raffic generators in (c Encouragement of outside traffic in the Etiw Etiwanda Avenue. . ands core and along �Y Parks and Potential for inadequate recreational Trails t location or type of parks. °PPortunities due to inappropriate Discontinuous or inadequate pedestrian, bicycle or equestrian ' Trail maintenance and implementation problems. circulation. . OPPORTUNITIES An opportunity to' lan n sa necessary P a circulation system that c without unduly impacting the sensitive �efely handle the ry traffi A chance to build on the existing elements that cont t the community through design standards for future development s ibute to the character of -protection of select mature vegetation; such as: -gradual replacement of windrows.guideline" -architectural and desi n Selection of commercial stes andsensitive to existing styles; as a whole, and types that are of benefit to the community identity. application of design standards to reinforce commun' tty ;E An opportunity to pian for an integrated the needs of the community. park and trail system responsive to 2.6 PURPOSE AND FOCIIS OF THE SPECIFIC PLAN 5a The preceding section outlined various trends and identified associated with new development in and anda possible problems problems could be addressed or solved b around Etiwanda. Many of these r methods such as zoning y using traditional and established .review. �� subdivision regulation, and design and development However, while some of these problems could be solved without an overall �•• `�'� Plan. all future development would follow! a 1pg tern virtually identical to the rest of the City without regard for the area's qualities, and the ° pportunity to retain the character and identity of Etiwanda ' as a community would be lost. In .order. to .further public health, safet character and identity -of this and welfare and to protect the community character, circulations end this plan must focus on areas of comprehensive fashion and within the overall framework of the City's� �, parks and trails, and do it in a Plan, as amended. y s General 2-6 Item E —106 3.42 OBJECTIVE Provide for the development of a safe,efficient, and cost effective to or street system to adequately support the community's circulation needs,1 for with minimum impact on the community. and. 3.43 POLICIES .100 Support the development of Route 30 as a transporation corridor to be located below grade wherever possible, with surface street access at East Avenue. 'ation irable .200 In recognition of its historic character, discourage excessive traffic on Etiwanda Avenue, particularly north of Base Line, in order to maintain current street widths and design character :nt of where possible, and to carefully define those areas where ch with may be required because of traffic demand. ange .300 Discourage non-local through traffic from transversing the community on collector and local streets. .400 Discourage through traffic within residential areas. must ; .z .500 Discourage traffic generated by future development in the areas -tation beyond the current City limits from impacting the Etiwanda end to :: core, as well as other sensitive areas of Etiwanda. -VA'. ;: .600 Provide for planned rather than piecemeal access to undeveloped areas east of East Avenue. .700 Provide for alternate access to the high school site. .800 To assist in achieving policies .600 and .700 above, consider i.Y construction of a north-south bypass road in the .vicinity of East Etiwanda Creek, should additional flood control land become �- available. ride for ' these .900 Encourage rural road standards and image whenever traffic volumes drainage, , and other considerations allow. )ective, 3.5 COMMERCIAL SERVICES rich will •L..:.... 3.51 LIMITATIONS r: The location and scope p of future commercial facilities in Etiwanda ice area must be closely tied to all other components of the Specific Plan. The most obvious and important determinants for the commercial facilities y7a � are land use and circulation as well as other elements. enter at d " m � With - �";;,: rol of 3-6 item E -107 The key to a successful solution to the commercial services uest' lies in achieving a fine balance. Too many shopping areas can disr ion (� the community by attracting traffic and associated problems from elsewhere; too few shopping. opportunities or inappropriate locations result in unnecessary traffic due to'-excessive travel distances and j circuitous routes. Finally, it must be pointed out that the commercial facilities will be constructed by the private..sector according to guidelines and regulations built into the S ecific ply, the those facilities are not likely to be implemented if their stare result, unrealistic in terms of marketing, access, or inadequacy of service areas. 3.b 2 OBJECTIVES .100 Prevent future commercial areas and adversely impacting the character of the commutiitntraffic from .200 Prevent future commercial areas and adversely impacting the associated traffic from established and Victoria Avenues. Dore, including Etiwanda, .300 Provide future shopping and other commercial facilities to adequately serve Etiwanda minimumresidentse. every day needs with environmentd.� tion of the quality of the residential .400 Where appropriate and feasible without n undue disruption of J residential areas, provide the commercial facilities to serve the community as a whole. 3.53 POLICIES ------------- The following types of commercial facilities should be established to serve the Etiwanda area: .100 Neighborhood Commercial This center or centers should be provided to meet the retail and service needs of a cluster of neighborhoods with a total Population of roughly 8,000 to 10,000 residents. The primary use within the neighborhood shopping center should be a major supermarket with a total leasable area ranging from 30,000 to 100,000 square feet. o Where feasible, such facilities should be conveniently accessible by bicycle and by foot, as well as by automobile. o The centers should be located no closer th one another. one mile of o The location of neighborhood center(s) should not encourage vehicular traffic in areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. established residential 3-7 Item E —108 4.21 —VEHICULAR CIRCULATION CONCEPTS • .100 Freeways Circulation concepts are based on policies which support the development of Route 30 as a freeway along the north side of Highland Avenue, with surface street access at-East Avenue. .200 Major Surface Roads The proposed street-system relies on a number of new and existing linkages: .201 New 24th Street: This road provides a connection between Day Creek Boulevard and Cherry Avenue/I-15 - Interchange. The purpose of this major parkway is to serve areas which are not currently accessible by improved roads, and to divert future traffic generated in the t 4,000 acre area north of the project boundaries by channeling traffic to the nearest regional arteries outside Etiwanda. .202Existing East Avenue: East Avenue is to be widened to secondary arterial status. .203 Existing Etiwanda Avenue: Etiwanda Avenue, north of Base Line, is to be protected and maintained in its • current improvement width and design character. • Special access and land use controls to be taken to reduce potential traffic conflicts to greatest degree possible. South of Base Line, an effort will also be made to protect the character of Etiwanda Avenue; however, current improvement widths cannot be maintained due to projected traffic volumes. .204 Existing Highland Avenue: Highland Avenue is planned to become a frontage road running parallel to, and just - south of, the Route 30 Freeway between Day Creek Boulevard and East Avenue. Highland is not planned to continue east of East Avenue other than as a local street. *(In the event the development of Route 30 Freeway is not possible because of events beyond the City's control, Highland Avenue improvement width is planned to be sufficient for utilization as the south half (eastbound lanes) of a major divided arterial roadway.) .205 Possible B ass Road: The construction of a north- south "Bypass" road should be considered along East Etiwanda Creek should additional flood control land become available. .300 Overall Circulation Concept • The overall circulation p concept proposed°posed by the plan is shown on he facing page (Fig. 4-1). p Item E -109 4.23 COMMERCIAL SERVICES CONCEPT The location and scope of future commercial facilities in Etiwanda is closely tied to all other components of the Specific Plan. For -the purpose of the conceptual plan, commercial facilities within the Etiwanda planning areas can be grouped into several basic types, based . on the level of service they provide, and on their impact on the community: .100 Neighborhood Shopping Centers •-"' Major impact, substantial -traffic generator, 5-10 acres. - Includes a supermarket and/or other major store. Planned locations Se.�.. .101 Vicinity of East Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. ;5 Ave. __. _ .102 Vicinity of East Avenue and 24th Street.. _3 .200 Other Retail Commercial - .201 Localized impact, limited level services: Includes Convenience shopping, Freeway-related services, and similar commercial uses. (� .202 Special Community Services Strictly controlled, localized impact, limited or specialized commercial and quasi-commercial:facilities, planned with the express intent to: o Provide a community focal point in the heart of Etiwanda, to. o reinforce a sense of community identity, and to . o encourage perpetuation of those elements and features which provide a tie to Etiwanda's heritage. .300 Overall Commercial Service Concept Fig 4-3 on the facing page indicates the general location of all commercial land use types proposed by the plan. The commercial types are distinguished by the type of service intended. 4-5 Item E -110 24 TH STREET I Q / I ROUTE 30 F�GFA AIm AVE I / r ' TORW r 40 ARK L �( L I / T AVE. ssa of 0►� Neighborhood Commercial A W Freeway Related / �► General {LYr.. is J Convenience Shopping Cony N: ±. FOOTHLL 8LVD. / .: _` -''. �� / t Special Community Services' iagsol title figure i 'COMMERCIAL SERVICES _ •u; Item E —111 4.3 OVERALL PLAN CONCEPT Figure 4-6 on the facing page combines several major concepts which form. the framework 'of the Specific ' Plan. The intent is to show the interrelationships of several major components on one map, in simple terms .`", ' and without much detail. The major components shown in Figure 4-6 include:, o Circulation The map indicates in heavy lines all existing and proposed roads of collector or higher status. All freeway access points are also shown. y' o Land Use Proposed residential it and their relative intensities are represented by diagonal linework, as noted in the legend. =tP Proposed commercial uses are also shown. The only major commercial facilities are the two neighborhood commercial centers indicated b 7' � y .. bold asterisks. o Trails The Plan contains an extensive system of trails. Figure 4-6 indicates all community trail alignments. - i 4-9 Item E -112 I 1 Yo:•:off:;:. Awl 60 eighborhood Commercial Other Comm. Freeway Access Major Road MENEM 002 Community Trail Lower— ' aj .fii%/! Vii! Density Nil Higher—4. �a title OVERALL PLAN CONCEPT .s�.. 5.23 COMMERCIAL AND.OFFICE DISTRICTS .100 Establishment of Commercial And Office Districts In order to carry out policies of Chapter 3, the following Commercial and.Office Districts are established: NC Neighborhood Commercial District CC - Convenience Commercial District PC .- Freeway Related Commercial GC - General Commercial District OP - Office Professional District OS - Community Service District .200 Prohibited, Permitted And Conditional Uses_ 9 .201 Objectionable Uses and Processes Prohibited: No uses shall be permitted and no process', equipment, or materials shall be employed which are found to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare by Ll reason of odor, fumes, dust, smoke, cinders,dirt, refuse LS water-carried wastes, noise, vibration, glare, ,d electromagnetic interference, unsightliness, or other. ,g objectionable feature, or to involve.a hazard of fire or S, = explosion. as .202 Limitations on Permitted and conditional Uses on Property in Proximity to an Existing Church: No delicatessen, restaurant, service station, theatre, . n auditorium, nor any business selling or serving alcoholic beverages, on or off site, shall be located with 1,000 feet of an existing church use. .203 The following schedule indicates by the symbol 11P1 the uses that shall be permitted in each commercial district; and by the symbol "C" the uses that shall be permitted upon the granting of a Conditional Use . :: Permit. All other uses shall be prohibited. .V i•ti .;... 5-10 Item E -114 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY JANUARY 15, 2008 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA/BASE LINE HISTORIC STUDY TASK FORCE MINUTES Special Meeting A. CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the Rancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Base Line Historic Study Task Force was held on Tuesday, January 15, 2008, in the Tri-Communities Room of the Civic Center, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Kurth called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. Present were Task Force members: Mayor, Donald Kurth; Councilmember Diane Williams; Planning Commission Chairman Pam Stewart; and Commissioner Munoz. Staff present were: James Troyer, Planning Director; Larry Henderson, Principal Planner; Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary; Corkran Nicholson, Assistant Planning Director; Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner Larry Henderson, Principal Planner, explained the process of the workshop and the order of the agenda. Councilmember Williams expressed concern that if public communication was only taken at the start of the meeting, the public might be denied their comments if they waited to the end of the meeting to speak. She felt it was important for them to speak at the end or both times. Mr. Henderson stated that the Task Force could change the order of the agenda and/or hear comments at the beginning and the end of the meeting if that is their pleasure. The remaining Task Force members concurred to take comments at the beginning and the end of the meeting. Mayor Kurth opened the floor for public comment. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Francisco Oaxaca stated he is a member of the Park and Recreation Commission but that his comments were from his perspective as a resident in the neighborhood northwest of the project site. His remarked that the neighborhood residents have concerns such as: 1) no identified need for a commercial use; 2) traffic concerns, particularly considering the nearby schools and the constant stream of traffic; 3) historic significance of the intersection as one of the last gateway locations to the key historic corridor, and 4) a previous land use determination for the northwest corner was deemed that residential was a more appropriate use. He commented that • this project proposal is driving the amendment whereas he believes an appropriate use as Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 1 Item E —115 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY determined by the current Etiwanda Specific Plan and the General Plan should drive the use proposal. Jim Frost, a member of the Chamber of Commerce and the Etiwanda Historical Society, commented that the width of Etiwanda Avenue was intentionally left the way it is north of Base Line Road knowing that at some point in time it would become a traffic problem and that eventually people would find another way around it. He remarked that this development proposal does not make sense here. He commented that there is no guarantee what specific store may come into this property site. He said the Etiwanda Specific Plan has been violated from time to time and this time it should probably be left as is. He said the historic corridor is there and we should look for other opportunities. James Banks Jr. commented that he lives adjacent to this proposed use. He said he spent many hours on the Etiwanda Specific Plan with the original committee to decide where commercial uses should go. He commented that the committee was unanimous in not wanting commercial uses in the heart of the corridor. He noted that there is vacant property available several hundred yards to the west of this site that is already zoned for commercial use. He remarked that if the plan had been followed then stone curbs would still be there and the sides of houses would not face Etiwanda Avenue. Marsha Banks, stated she is the former chairman of the first Historic Preservation Commission. She noted that many significant historical areas such as Williamsburg VA, would not have a Costco or a Walgreens as a welcome sign and that it does not belong on Etiwanda Avenue either. She said now after many years we are considering a historic district and she implored that it be done right; i.e. Walgreens is not compatible. Willie Jordan reported that his property would back up to the proposed Walgreens and stated his opposition for traffic reasons and the safety of many small children. He suggested a more suitable site. Renee Benmoin commented that she has three small children and this proposal presents a danger to children for traffic reasons and that some people would hang out at a Walgreens. She said the project site should remain designated for residential. She felt the development would also hinder the historic corridor and people visiting the Chaffee Garcia House. She said she moved from Orange County where there are commercial uses on every corner. She said it is good to have a place where you can escape from all of that. C. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00550 - CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES - A request to change the current land use designation of Low-Medium Residential to Neighborhood Commercial and includes an amendment of the Etiwanda Specific Plan for the two parcels located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay District. APN: 0227-131-17 & 0227-131-39. TASKFORCE WORKSHOP OF ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2007-00604 - CHARLES JOSEPH & ASSOCIATES -A request to amend the Etiwanda Specific Plan to change the Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 2 Item E —116 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY • current Low-Medium Residential District designation of the two parcels located at the northeast corner of Base Line Road and Etiwanda Avenue to include them in the Neighborhood Commercial District and the Community Service Overlay and to amend the uses for which a Conditional Use Permit is required to include drugstores with and without a drive-through lane not to exceed 18,000 square feet. APN: 0227-131-17 & 0227-131-39. Larry Henderson, Principal Planner suggested Chuck Buquet from Charles Joseph and Associates give his presentation. Chuck Buquet commented that he was present for the Planning Commission workshop on November 28, 2007. He noted that he met with the Etiwanda Historical society last Tuesday. He commented that this project has to go through the process including Planning Commission and the City Council and that the application was just recently filed and has a long way to go. He gave a brief review of the project noting that it contemplates about 15,000 square feet and is low scale intensity and is intended to be a service to the area. He remarked that one of the speakers noted an available site but that it is 10 acres and the project proposed is for a 2 acre site. He also noted that the site to the west has not been considered really viable for commercial use. He said the proposal is for a single use and that it respects the Historic District. He added that using this site as a gateway has been contemplated in the design. He said the Community Service District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan provides for specialty markets and retail services within the Community Services overlay which covers the old downtown area. He said a retail use of up to 18,000 feet is permitted in the code. He referred to the highlighted excerpts distributed of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. He commented that they are looking to • incorporate a provision of the Community Services District located across the street by creating a design that has a single use restriction and that they are not looking for the full range of commercial uses allowed by that designation. He said they are sensitive to the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the protocol and its history. He said he believes the traffic concerns would be improved by the development as well as interfacing with the historic area. Don Howard, Vice President, Marketplace Properties, commented this is their third project in the City. He added that Mike Rue and Casey Rue will also be available for questions after the meeting. He said the site is viable for commercial use. He said a traffic study was done as part of the General Plan. He said they have strongly considered the sensitivity of the area and referred to section 3.51 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP) which describes the limitations for commercial services in the planned area. He said the retail opportunities in the area are narrow and that they see this as an opportunity to provide services that are not there now. He said the design has been discussed with the Etiwanda Historical Society and the Planning Commission and they had useful dialogue with both groups. He commented that they learned that a collaborative effort to the end and listening to the concerns of the community has proved successful with their two prior project developments. He referred to intersection photos taken of the site that indicate that not much is there today as far as a gateway and that this is an opportunity to showcase the historic area and to design something that everyone/all committees will be happy with. He asked for their support to move forward with their application and then they will more specifically address the design, architecture, traffic concerns, etc. He opened the floor for questions. An unidentified speaker confirmed that the project proposal is for a 2-acre site, and a 15,000 • square foot single building/drugstore and that the exhibit is a rendering. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 3 Item E —117 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Mr. Howard confirmed the basic project application and emphasized that it is a preliminary rendering. Mr. Henderson clarified that this application is a General Plan zone change amendment and that they are not being asked to approve this conceptual design or a Walgreens at this time. He said those are separate applications and this will have to go through the architectural review process, Planning Commission, and City Council and that the only thing the Task Force is being asked to advise the Council on now is the land use amendment. He said this is a policy area that is sensitive and the Council is very concerned about it. He remarked that the original application came in as a Neighborhood Commercial classification application but they were advised that the Community Services designation would be better but that a text amendment would be required to allow this use to that designation and for the text amendment an initiation from the Council is required. He noted that staff has highlighted all the areas in the ESP that would have to be amended before this use could be allowed (refer to attachments of the staff report). He commented that environmental studies would have to be prepared including traffic, noise and air quality. He summarized the text changes such as trends towards pressure to develop in a piecemeal fashion and to develop commercial facilities at locations most beneficial for business purposes; potential problems such as the loss of existing historical character through the widening of streets, etc.; impact of commercial development on residential and other sensitive areas, potential traffic problems resulting from locating major traffic generators in inappropriate locations, and the encouragement of outside traffic in the Etiwanda core and along Etiwanda Avenue. He said these were basic premises as to why the plan was set up. He said there were additional overlays for the development north of the site that now include the schools and the depot with the intent of limiting the uses for those properties. He noted that with policies in mind, on page 3-6 of the ESP comments on maintaining the street character on Etiwanda Avenue. He remarked that the Traffic Engineer has indicated that the traffic would be a "C" level with this project albeit an acceptable level will be greater than what would be generated by a residential land use. He noted that those numbers would be available at a later time. He noted that in regards to the location of commercial services that it should be limited in scope as noted in section 3.52, OBJECTIVES: .100 -prevent future commercial areas and associated traffic from adversely impacting the character of the community, and .200 - prevent future commercial areas and associated traffic from adversely impacting the established core, including Etiwanda, and Victoria Avenues. He added that under 3.53 POLICIES, .100 Neighborhood Commercial, the centers should be located no closer than one mile of one another. He commented that there is another center in close proximity, less than '/z mile away. He said this text would have to be eliminated if this project moves forward in order to be consistent. He noted that the section also states that the location of neighborhood center(s) should not encourage vehicular traffic in established residential areas or on Etiwanda Avenue. He then remarked that in 4.21 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION CONCEPTS, .203, it comments on protecting Etiwanda Avenue north of Base Line Road, including the width and design character through access and land use controls. He commented that 4.23.100 - Neighborhood Shopping Centers delineates where these sites should be located. He pointed out that this is not one of the sites where it should be located. He said it is obvious as to why staff is concerned because much of the language of the ESP would have to be changed. Mayor Kurth asked what the site was originally used for. Mr. Henderson reported that it was an old automotive repair garage. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 4 Item E —118 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Mayor Kurth asked why it was changed from commercial in the first place. Mr. Henderson said he was not here at the time but noted that the service station has been closed for many years. Councilmember Diane Williams commented that she recalls it may have been closed for 50 years. Mr. Henderson commented that over the years many people came to us with a request to reactivate that site as a garage and each time they were told no because the ESP was rather specific about the development on that site. Councilmember Williams asked about the possibility of the site being "dirty" (i.e. hazardous waste/soils) particularly with oils and chemicals being poured directly on the ground. Mr. Henderson commented that the normal process would be for a soils test to be performed and it would have to be certified before the developer could proceed. Councilmember Diane Williams commented that she is pleased that she is somewhat responsible for the Task Force coming into being so that the remaining Etiwanda sites could be considered as part of the whole of the area from Base Line Road up to the freeway. She commented on the importance of nurturing the important sites rather than losing them. She said that the Task Force also met before Henry's Market came in. She added that they want to keep something special in this one tiny place in our City that is different. She said she appreciates the fact that we are hanging in there and she would like to hear more from the public. Chairman Stewart asked the applicant to give some background information regarding other sites and the suggestion regarding the site to the west. Mr. Howard commented that they wanted to do a small project in keeping with the Etiwanda area with one-tenant and determined that a drug store use does not exist for this specific area and it fits the need and fits well from a traffic standpoint. He indicated the other site does not fit their needs. Mayor Kurth invited the public for comment. Frank Oaxaca remarked that the breadth of changes to the planning documents creates concern. He said we should not "fall into the abyss" of a potentially successful commercial proposal driving the land use decisions. He said in spite of the commercial overlay, the history of what has occurred in the Etiwanda area should be more heavily weighed. He said it is valuable that we have areas where we can escape the retail/commercial type of use and experience the history of what it once was and what we have tried to preserve in the Etiwanda area. Renee Bemoin commented that the few schools that have close-by commercial uses have problems in that it is more dangerous for school children because of traffic and loitering. She said this is so close to an intersection that it poses more danger. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 5 Item E —119 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Mr. Howard responded stating there would a condition imposed requiring a right turn deceleration lane that would complete the turn on to northbound Etiwanda Avenue. He said a combination deceleration/bus turn out lane would also be included. He remarked that the current traffic conditions are unsafe but that the development would improve those conditions and those concerns have been incorporated into the site plan. He noted that the school traffic would be occurring at different times than for the drugstore. Councilmember Williams asked why the previously mentioned site that is available directly north of the winery could not be used for this. Mr. Buquet said it could not be used for this and is restricted with a specialty commercial designation and therefore a drugstore like this may not be permitted. Councilmember Williams said this proposal has much more of an impact than a residential use. Mr. Buquet reported that years ago everyone wanted to have their property zoned commercial. A study resulted and a number of re-designations occurred. He commented that particular site has been sitting there for a number of years but no calls for commercial uses have come in for that site and in fact the westernmost portion of the site has since been re-zoned for residential and is now developed with new homes and a condo map has also been filed. He noted that with the freeway coming in, Base Line Road has much less traffic. He said it is an issue of context because he is talking about a special retail use that that fits with the community character, much smaller than those referred to in the text of the plan. He said much of that text that has been highlighted is not what this project is about. He said they recognize they have a long way to go. He said they would continue to share the concept for consideration. He said it is what an investor is willing to invest millions of dollars in and develop. He said there is much forethought that goes into these decisions. He said for everything he is told as to why it would not work, he has three reasons as to why it would. Charlie Buquet stated the development would have to provide a shared access with the residential development. Commissioner Munoz asked if they are seeking the Neighborhood Commercial designation or Community Services. Chuck Buquet responded that they are seeking the Community Services designation that is more restrictive. Commissioner Munoz expressed thanks for all the comments. He stated that we are in the middle of this process and no decisions have been made. He said this Committee has duly noted the public comments and that he shares their concerns. He noted that this proposal bumps up against the ESP in numerous ways. Chairman Stewart commented that this workshop is more formal than usual. She noted that this project has not gone to Design Review and the reason this project is before the Task Force is because it was presented at a Planning Commission workshop and concerns were expressed. She said this is being taken to the point in order for the applicant to decide if they should move forward with their proposal. She noted that traffic impacts/mitigations would have to be considered and the difference of a Neighborhood Commercial land use or a Community Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 6 Item E —120 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY • Services land use. She referred to page 519 of the ESP and said that in view of the Community Services District it could be viable within that designation as far as the criteria. She noted that if they are to move forward, something would have to be done in the spirit and cooperation to really hone into the importance of the historic district in terms of being true to that district. She said in considering all of that it might not pencil out; some residents feel the use is needed and others do not. She said it is the issue of the land use and that she is not totally opposed to the use proposal but getting it to that district and tying it to the historic district is the challenge. She added that she believes the development could help the traffic issues there. Councilmember Diane Williams said this is a tiny district/unique area we are clinging to and we need to protect it. She commented that they had these same discussions prior to the development of Henry's Market and she expressed her disappointment in the big blank walls that came with the development. She said she is so sorry they are there and the drawings presented looked wonderful and now that it is built she is disappointed that all she sees are big white walls, that the other buildings cannot even be seen until you pull into the development and turn around and look. She said this is her greatest fear; a wonderful drawing and then seeing it differently after it is built. She said this is the problem with doing the land use amendment based upon what the product is going to be and that you may end up with a surprise. She said she would like them to investigate other ways to make something more creative for that corner. She commented that it is a catch 22. She said residential would be fine; moving some old homes on site and allow low intensity businesses such as a real estate office or something that closes at 6:00 p.m. or something that would only park 3 or 4 cars. She suggested they build replicas of old structures for some other low key business use, but that a Walgreens is not the kind of use she sees on that corner. She said it is intense with cars in and out all the time and • at Christmas people are circling for a parking space. She remarked that in the old days they had to drive to Ontario for a prescription and they survived, and that we may not need a drugstore on every corner. She said she would prefer something less intense and more compatible with the neighborhood. Mayor Kurth said he respects the historic heritage here and he is impressed with the work and commitment to preserve the historic district. He commented that his sister lives in Williamsburg, Virginia and noted that although a gorgeous area, it is not entirely residential and there are a lot of commercial uses in the historic district; that it may not necessarily be inconsistent with historical. He said he wondered why the site was not zoned commercial in the first place because it looks like it should be a commercial corner and wondered why it was changed. He said he is not opposed to commercial uses there as long as it is done right and they follow the standards. He commented that a Walgreens may not be the best use on that corner but the one in his neighborhood does not seem to be a problem; he has not observed kids loitering or significant traffic. He remarked that there may be an opportunity to make it more of a gateway/entryway to the historic area. He said he liked the idea of putting old homes there. He said perhaps they could "hold the developer's feet to the fire" and get something really nice out of it. He added that it is the developer's job to make it pencil out. He suggested they find a way to "blend" it so that perhaps a beautiful entryway to the historic district could be developed and still allow progress and a benefit to the community and make it better. He said the Rancho Cucamonga way is to find a better way to do it. Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 7 Item E —121 DRAFT - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY D. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING x x x x x E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, James R. Troyer, AICP Planning Director v Etiwanda/Base Line Historic Study Task Force Minutes January 15, 2008 Page 8 Item E —122 _ tr V '� y .-' ..' !� M3 ��. il• '� iit� - ��� l4tl s ....I x � + i* ,y 7. IT ma=,lace PERSPECTIVE NEC of Edwande Avenue and 9a�Line Read. P,+ uit�arrihk • '� K5...,: E T °�_.T T: _ @!� i"T. ;@._Ya ;ri.'d�uF rd`-:? t�+R' .... ,,. ,.: ,. --. m ,d s � � ry+STTg3�f.»� W _ _ - e -- Z U-1 Q { E etail Z J- ,000 SF dL� ,rt : �J AREA:: !96,000 GPD55 SF REA: 15'"SF m ���� OVIDED' 81 SPALLS 1 _ W - 1 QUIRED: ]5 SPALLS PTIO: 5.4/1000 N Ln t t9g,41;;:=-,i=i - 11 BASE LINE ROAD COLOR SITE PLAN ill P�F0�i�11E9 /' � Pe*o�h��m Fercho�uea•^a!ge.CalHamle �� STAFF REPORT PL1N\I\G 17EI'ART�IE\T DATE:' October 28, 2015 RANCHO TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission C;UCAMONGA FROM: Candyce Burnett, Planning Director BY: Tom Grahn, Associate Planner SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960 — WILSON ESTATES, LLC - A request to subdivide 4.36 acres into 12 residential lots in the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located on the north side of Wilson Avenue, west of Etiwanda Avenue, at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court-, APN: 1087- 261-12. Related Files: Design Review DRC2015-00811. Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines as a Class 32 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332) exemption, which covers in-fill development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18960 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Project Density: 1.67 dwelling units/acre B. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North - Single-Family Residences, Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan South - Single-Family Residences, Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan East - Single-Family Residences, Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan West - Single-Family Residences, Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan C. General Plan Designations: Project Site - Low Residential North - Low Residential South - Low Residential East - Low Residential West - Low Residential D. Site Characteristics: The 4.36-acre project site is located at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court, which is located generally in the area north of Wilson Avenue between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue. The site is located within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) and is surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by existing quarter-acre single-family developments that are also within the Low (L) Residential District of the ENSP. The site is triangular in shape with a dimension of approximately 661 feet along the southerly project boundary, approximately 614 feet along the westerly project boundary, and approximately 430 feet along the easterly project boundary. The site is vacant and has been used as an interim storm drain detention basin. Item F —1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960—WILSON ESTATES, LLC October 28, 2015 Page 2 ANALYSIS: A. General: The project site is located within the limits of,. and was originally proposed for development under Tract 13527. Tract 13527 is a 252 lot, .88-acre subdivision located on the . north side of Wilson Avenue and west of Etiwanda Avenue; the project site is located in the extreme southwest corner of that subdivision. The development of Tract 13527 required the project site to be developed as an interim detention basin that was needed for storm drain purposes until downstream improvements were developed. The development of the San Sevaine basin, located approximately 1.25 miles east of the project site, made this interim detention basin unnecessary for storm drain purposes. The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 4.36-acre parcel into 12 lots for future residential development. The project site is located within the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), which permits a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, with an average lot size of 10,000 square feet, and a minimum net lot size of 7,200 square feet. Lots within the proposed subdivision range in size from 9,520 square feet to 25,278 square feet, with an average lot size of 12,439 square feet and a project density of 3.18 dwelling units per acre. The project complies with all applicable development standards of the ENSP and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (RCDC). B. Neighborhood Meeting: Two neighborhood meetings were held to obtain input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meetings were held at the Lion's East Community Center on August 27, 2015 and October 1, 2015. The following is a list of questions that were raised by the attending residents regarding the proposed project: QUESTIONS RESPONSES 1. Is the detention basin needed for The interim on-site detention basin was needed until flood control purposes? downstream improvements were completed. The completion of the San Sevaine Basin, and the requirement of the applicant to connect to existing storm drain infrastructure, made the interim detention basin unnecessary. 2. Was a traffic study prepared and will The 12 lots in the subdivision will generate 12 peak a new street connection to Wilson hour trips, well below the threshold of 50 peak hour Avenue be installed? trips that would trigger the need for a Traffic Study, so a Traffic Study is not required. This subdivision will connect to existing streets within the adjacent subdivision and no new connection to Wilson Avenue will be installed. 3. We do not want the project to The project site is located within the Low Residential eliminate the view that we currently District, which allows for single-family residential have, because we believe this may development with a maximum height of 35 feet. reduce the value of our homes. Will Proposed building pads within the project are below future homes obstruct my view? the pad level of existing adjacent single-family homes, and the project will include a mix of single- and two- story homes to minimize view disruptions. 4. We are in a drought and this The project site is located within the service limits of development will use a significant the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The amount of water to grade and applicant has a "will serve" letter from the CVWD Item F —2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960—WILSON ESTATES, LLC • October 28, 2015 Page 3 ultimately develop the project. How indicating that there is sufficient water to support can the City approve a project that development of the proposed project. will impact water resources? 5. What is the estimated time of The applicant provided information regarding their development, and what is the estimated project development timeline and initial estimated sales rice? estimated sales rice. C. Design Review Committee: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on August 4, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. D. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project.qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project meets all of the requirements stated in the CEQA Guidelines. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designation and regulations, which allows for a density of 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The site has been utilized as an interim detention basin and has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The 12 residential lots are below the threshold requiring a traffic study, and there are no noise or water quality impacts. A Technical Memorandum (Advanced Civic Group, April 29, 2015) determined that with the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACM's) air quality impacts would not exceed regional significance thresholds. Furthermore, the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. With implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Respectfully submitted, Candyce Burnett Planning Director CB:TG/jp Attachments: Exhibit A— Site Utilization Map Exhibit B—Tentative Tract Map Exhibit C — Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit D — Landscape Plan Exhibit E — Design Review Committee Action Agenda Resolution of Approval Item F —3 m TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18960 5a�� IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA z SEPiF"NFR 21J A J'd AF.RFSUROSS I7N-FIFRFU101S T p W l}l AM SNET YLEIiENEOLUiS SITE UTILIZATION MAP °j - _ , _ zs— VICINITY MAP ' E E w - ., ♦ ':' rYJlac'Tao.leeez-1 . ... .,, ♦♦ '\`%IBING``.B.��MlE Fa1,LY Y`�,�i� ���r� � ... '^ .:J !=•� 'rs.. I � - .FJ(67NO ZONA f ../' ♦N� :'. % .. - .. •.� It(I k�"" .. 'S� �� �'+ i♦ •�.E �'' /' �;�.:tr�'�.;;V• ,•� ;IY.• 'rr.<.r lit � { .: • ..� - ♦ •:"(• r .± �Y' _ SCALE IN FEL( Je.Fa. :ax:. • ♦♦ /'J ''J _ 'Ji• A - // , ♦ .-� erf`�i,� / .(�' r'j E � air annars� al J: S( '•T', j ♦ - - 'b. =• .J�.' r '#. h�C" `^ /. ,/.. �,.. y J f ... K 1 .. --' .V .~t-�• �♦I �. •`� ' �� I.;!•.?.•+ x.6/1,�.�11tA�TNR OSQ7����--_— \/ ':.. SIII.Itlt:ai WNe,.u.,.. �i I -. .__..` ems- ; b!•s+ �'''4/EJ097,►OBIgLE Y _ �1 ,..... ... ^.s..e... �� j its . i ♦F�x /� ,�Y s l; ♦ •'�. `� , / EIUdTNO ZOIfJD,� - Cp," �.N'�jF�, Tl �. `. ♦ i..." .%'•'.�;'. a� IOW-AEOLA�DLTj911T'RE ./ ' ,� _. ' •,' Y � 1ID•1 Y TRACT NO. x \ \•,:• ✓. h.., l"''`�• I i•f, "Y ;i� '}' i a�:.oiEsliou,aioLeFuar 'A \ > bW n „ 1a`T--7.:• () �v • 9' JE)6Rio zotaJu ""'a. \�;•: A: 1 f t Z t.,! 9 "'a `''�'.;..�____._.�,'�` e_' ) xt•.A :.,�,1 �R.� xi:. w - :,., .rE`,:4,. t%=`:`9:lLt�� 'y`�.j�.• rr� ., ;�` • {':f'J�+. •,,,:i's.£s •i�;., ..,il,;.'•- .'-.. Q � LLJ \ .�.� ,,yy_,���� • .2�q�0.. '� )� `••n'E-"q"I,TRlCT J7Ot 74L!`;^`�.� v� `K• � ../.. :. E-:J •�'...+11�1'IJ !t ,j .•V,.1+ � 81J6LE FAlar.IJe[IotMUL I � : .. M B re ,1. io6arfazavio.•.-.• •�i :;Y*�•�;:' •,i�,T41.:.'�"/G�`,.:: _,L`slY iav i®L LI oamY. Toni d. F 1 a. mwr r . ,� "'•::'i I: 17U91NOJFArfLr ;h. •.. I,,::y' ! EM61fW 6,rHu.e FAMLY/p{,YRESIDENTIAL oceTWO'z• .+f-.F,-.✓ -. :+ •> ;.. ,. `;`•.. ��W�.®1111:1pdH1Y 'fEEICUIRIL LOW- WAUBl91T''{E NrUI a,A,�•a ..,': u� /'.',. .: i:;jt ♦ / ��r:'.w.n./• ..: 4 ^j•. `..L"J ..: ,��,, _- ^�A'•A '1 ''• TRi{ _ .♦ 1 ,_{i F,� st :' 1 `�r;}�.z _t +JeiYi-^^ •' t t y L.,J•i. .:'.._ !,<,,�'.M t� qj 1, tti"• ��j;, j •TI�J"•R yJ7'`•+'wr:.' i r:�^i. .t .._ �:iv" .' � 1 4 - r:','S� r'•=•.:..••�?.d1,� I t. .'. 1 ery 6'iMq:T;w.,�,�... ^y.,p. ,._�_.��,.ACon�.:�.T.7...�...�:•y--,«!' ���.i:.S� _.._„I !r ._. a •�:�.. .._. ..'! URY/N tlY 6.1E !SEPT 20k1 wtns�c No. UHC NUMtlli"lU1J_ W V I UHC NULWF.4]UIJ� SUB7T:8M sm 1 s 1 Jw m 9 0 9 TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18960a ik IN THE CRY OF RANCHO 0 NG — COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDN40,STATE ATE OF CALIFORNIA. °R" 8 m.am arlb rv.u>JamJ mun•Jon•n, yl IIFCF4FFk]Gla uJti AI:XFS URUNS Il MW RFIJIOTS ,I •i , Q J lI AIX�]NCI SICTTEh:IllO1S TENTATIVE TRACT MAPWO VICINITY MAP � LI C C ' L01 tepU.10t LnllGll ..I \\ /•;•'\\ ,3 `\ ..gyp` ..iF !: .,. .. C•Ko�:, iiz_—' 3 x \ �'J \ •,.\ �/C 4' `�/1 _`,(c ir; jib uln lnl,__ IAN:r� 4 1 Vl w \\ sp s i;� \ ��/ e `4p }/t \ j % ` '• rut's R ((I �,..: 1 0cl .�• QIeI �'U /`� - et➢ .I/ \ 11 i�Loro. 6�/ I – X cd 12 El xv s'J.Y J __. J,11' J o rt nattu Ivsyuw- !� W r: 1 - l.l�JJ er e, i Lot (L.M.D. -D'(E• 1 LolL M.D.) Lut '(LM .M.D.) Lot ( - ._ .. - Cn C •H•L M.D.) 4 J - WILSON AVENUE .+.SAI SSIMS 1•AN11:1 NUMBER .n':m-za-v 4s J _ I` _ �— .yt^�'••`I IL`. - - `_ _.i.L —_ .._ _ I:IVI!I11(:INI 11< UWN BY WE AUG 2015 M111.41 NIiINI FRS DEMlUI'I RKIK'NI R ALTURA DRIVE TEJAS COURT - WDID#: DY.6AL L5`RCCI :tC1:ON ilplcft 5 CEI SKIP. „ � -a UNCNUMtlEX1011- TTM .u...rw,_..r� IIRC NUA,XNIl-- m wl6a ATHUE TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18960 IN THE CRY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, nen U p ix xul - .. FYi:ilEll C COUNTY OF SAN BEflNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ,xi.., 1 ,. ,r,N 1 i K.N:H»las ,� Naw •n _I_�____I_..._I�_.,. -- t.6 ACR FSCRUS6 1'11•�uFFRFNIUIS , ilf II j Lu J 9 "11 )i AUIESI.it ILEttLH:U_UI 6F°I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN ,.rw.. -�- rl. ,r... `"' wLsox1Avc„uE \ \ \ •i --".�:A•W.. ._._.-__ ��" � d ���L VICINITY MAP s' 6 . r unx 2 — SI I:IIUN'Yl-I I' `\ \ �•4E.t sv- ,�}� ` ` I= rn + 4 �/ 4 10 . �,.. =_3-_ •dam „J 't•. r fs •'b►I cn Noils i ::j 7 `f' '+ 1'`%�o n I,..I. 12 �\ �/ ..-_ -- !j'•-Y nib _ rprf'!I-, i o e ( 'ASSFSSUIIti`I rWIL,I_I NUMIFk'x i I,. 34. MPI I :rx� 1 LL ME A Fl` WILSON AVENUE E^Yz SU,ISf'Nr:INI'I'f15 rr l.•ran rr-e.,. c Z x;• � .r,.xr.arxr� I" _ -_... ..— _. "' r,l• u� i �:-i.�.1II. - rr -'. -t'x'" mi' _t•a - .-.�•V.:.:F.� \ _.f_�x�ulx. +�,-n \ Ij MIL ILN 'H_r• xlna I .. O I.A.) A16ilUcR A UG f.n 2014 IL SPI'ilw'1.{'- brG'IUN'I.r II�. aIl'1.. rc 111M.1�UI11 r.r1 r.NTN_ --- 00.lwK;IWp WDIDb: ALTURA DRIVE TEJAS COURT •'+ ..R.'L _- -- - /� ILP!C�I_S1R[F l_SECt10N UHC NUMIlN MII-_ C" 11P!9�.L SIP.L[I_SLSI!9N xN'"` Suint lCalN1 .1 rc 1 m =-_1'_I. A N L I' G E' N 1) TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 18960 1 Tr IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, _J COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.STATE OF CALIFORNIA. A VICINITY MAP "YT 4;7 r4. r,-UIT ll'[t r ID -n -4 10 01 if 11 K ell Mff Vf- 12 --- ------- WILSON AVENUE ® ,;+ - MENU m 0, 20' 40'50'60' THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA RANCHO G'UCAMONGA AUGUST 4 - 7:00 P.M. AMON Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER 7:00 p.m. Roll Call Regular Members: Richard Fletcher x Francisco Oaxaca x Staff attendance: Tom Grahn Candyce Burnett_ Donald Granger x Alternates: Ray Wimberly _ Frances Howdyshell_ Lou Munoz II. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation,the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony,although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960 — WILSON ESTATES, LLC - The A. SUBTT18960 subdivision of 4.36 acres into 12 residential lots in the Low (L) Residential Committee District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan located on the north side of Wilson recommended Avenue,west of Etiwanda Avenue,at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and approval. Tejas Court; APN: 1087-261-12. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP B. SUBTT19917 Committee SUBTT19917 - SHAREEF AWAD - A request to subdivide 7.17 recommended acres into 10 lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the approval. 1 of 2 EXHIBIT E Item F -8 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA �Ho AUGUST 4, 2015 CUCA14iONGA Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APN: 0226-102-30. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7.17 p.m. adjournment The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 23, 2015, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. I i 2 of 2 Item F —9 RESOLUTION NO. 15-67 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 18960,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 4.36 ACRES INTO 12 RESIDENTIAL LOTS IN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA NORTH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WILSON AVENUE, WEST OF ETIWANDA AVENUE, AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ALTURA DRIVE AND TEJAS COURT AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF-APN: 1087-261-12. A. Recitals. 1. Wilson Estates, LLC filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 18960, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 28th day of October 2015, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on October 28, 2015, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a 4.36-acre site, located at the southwest corner of Altura Drive and Tejas Court, which is located generally in the area north of Wilson Avenue between Day Creek Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue; and b. The property is located within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP) and is surrounded to the north, south, east, and west by existing quarter-acre single-family development that is also within the Low (L) Residential District of the ENSP; and C. The project site is triangular in shape with a dimension of approximately 661 feet along the southerly property line, approximately 614 feet along the westerly property line, and approximately 430 feet along the easterly property line; and d. The project site is vacant and has been utilized as an interim storm drain i detention basin. Downstream drainage improvements, specifically the development of the San Item F —10 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-67 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960—WILSON ESTATES, LLC October 28, 2015 Page 2 Sevaine Basin, and the connection of storm drain infrastructure leading to the basin render the basin unnecessary for storm water proposes; and e. The project site is located within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan (ENSP), which permits a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, with an average lot size of 10,000 square feet, and a minimum net lot size of 7,200 square feet. Lots within the proposed subdivision range in size from 9,520 square feet to 25,278 square feet, with an average lot size of 12,439 square feet and a project density of 3.18 dwelling units per acre. The project complies with all applicable development standards of the ENSP and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code (RCDC); and f. Two neighborhood meetings were conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The first meeting was held on Thursday, August 27, 2015 and the second meeting was held on Thursday, October 1, 2015; both meetings were held at the Lion's East Community Center; and g. The Design Review Committee reviewed the project on August 4, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission; and h. This application was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. • 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project will to subdivide the site into 12 parcels, in accordance with the Low(L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan and the Very Low General Plan land use designation; and b. The design of the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project site is located within the Low (L) Residential District of the Etiwanda North Specific Plan, which permits a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, with an average lot size of 10,000 square feet, and a minimum net lot size of 7,200 square feet. Lots within the proposed subdivision range in size from 9,520 square feet to 25,278 square feet, with an average lot size of 12,439 square feet and a project density of 3.18 dwelling units per acre; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of development proposed. The subdivision will comply with City standards including the. minimum lot area and dimensions requirements. The project density is 3.18 dwelling units per acre, which is within the allowable maximum of up to 4 dwelling units per acre; and d. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The • proposed project will subdivide the 4.36 acre site into 12 individual parcels. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA, Item F —11 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 15-67 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18960—WILSON ESTATES, LLC October 28, 2015 Page 3 Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) because the project meets all of the requirements stated in the CEQA Guidelines. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan and zoning designation and regulations, which allows for a density of 4 dwelling units per acre. The proposed development occurs within City limits on a project site of no more than 5 acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The site has been utilized as a detention basin and has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The 12 residential lots are below the threshold requiring a traffic study, and there are no noise or water quality impacts. A Technical Memorandum (Advanced Civic Group, April 29, 2015) determined that with the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACM's) air quality impacts would not exceed regional significance thresholds. Furthermore, the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. With implementation of the standard conditions and all applicable regulatory requirements, there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Ravenel Wimberly, Chairman ATTEST: Candyce Burnett, Secretary I, Candyce Burnett, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of October 2015, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Item F —12 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department CAMONGA Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers,' or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval and Conditions of Approval shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 03. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 4. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 5. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or Etiwanda North Specific Plan. This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 7. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 8. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. Printed 10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Item F —13 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 10. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 11. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 1.50 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 12. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, th design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 13. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 14. On flag lots, use a 12-foot driveway within the flag to maximize landscape area. 15. All units shall be provided with garage door openers if driveways are less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. 16. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 17. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 18. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 19. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda North Specific Plan. Printed:10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 13 Item F —14 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT 18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 20. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 21. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 22. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. • 23. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 24. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 25. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be wrought iron and/or decorative masonry. 26. Revised Site Plans and building- elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 27. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought iron or black plastic coated chain link to maintain an open feeling and enhance views. 28. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assuming that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision which shall be recorded concurrently with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixtures, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. Printed: 10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 13 Item F —15 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960- DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Planning ROJECT.Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 29. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each support post for all wood fences, with a minimum of two 1/2-inch lag bolts, to withstand high winds. Both post and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete footing. Pipe shall extend at least 4 feet, 6 inches above grade. 30. For all residential development, provide conduit from each unit/lot and a pull box to connect to the street. Provide interior structured wiring for each house/building with minimum Category 5 copper wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy (fiber-to-the building, FTTB). Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building Official review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 31. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 32. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi-family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Revise Drawing 1836-L to show additions to the Landscape Maintenance District (LIVID) plans, including all public and private drainage facilities crossing the LIVID area, and/or to cross-reference the new improvement plans you will be submitting. a. Retaining walls adjacent to sidewalks shall not have weep holes. Provide and show on the LIVID plans an alternate method for relieving hydrostatic pressures. b. Remove existing tubular steel fencing east of the gated access to Lot A. Gate shall be relocated to be 20 feet from the face of curb on Wilson Avenue. c. Protect existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, traffic signing and striping on Wilson Avenue, as required. 2. The surface overflow drainage easement on lot 7 shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of blockage in the sump catch basin on Altura Drive and provisions shall be made for overflows to pass through any walls placed across the easement. a. Landscaping within the overflow easement on Lot 7 should not impede Q100 street overflows or cause them to breach the easement area. 3. Once the storm drain in Lot A is connected and accepted by the City, process a vacation of the drainage easement on Lot B of Tract 13527. Construction of the storm drain shall be completed prior to final map recordation. 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size, shall be of a species and spaced in accordance with tho City's street tree program, subject to Fire Safety Division review if determined to be in the High Fi, Hazard area. Street trees shall be consistent with the existing street trees in Tract 13527. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/20/2015 Page 4 of 13 Item F —16 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT 18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. Altura Drive frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Local" standards including: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, street trees and curb cores. b. Cul-de-sac shall be in accordance with City Standard Plan 111 or 112. c. Provide 5800 lumen HPSV-equivalent LED street lights, as required. d. Provide traffic signing and striping, as required. 6. Revise Drawing 1836 to add drive approaches and curb cores on Altura Drive and Tejas Court, including any street tree and utility relocations that result. Also add curbside drain outlets and/or curb cores on Wilson Avenue. 7. Provide new improvement plans for the new cul-de-sac and for the new LIVID improvements along Wilson Avenue. 8. Complete the storm drain in Lot A and install a storm drain lateral from Wilson Avenue to Altura Drive per Drawing 2386-D prior to filling the existing basin. a. Revise Drawings 1845-D and 1988-D to cross reference Drawing 2386-D. b. Match existing access road as shown on Drawing 1435-D (3"AC/4"AB) and complete to Wilson Avenue. Existing V-ditch along the toe of slopes in Tract 15982-1 shall be protected in place as Lot A is being graded and paved. Existing manholes shall be raised to grade. 9. Install local storm drains to convey all development drainage to the Master Plan Storm Drains. The cost of local storm drains shall be borne by this development with no fee credit. a. For sump conditions, the storm drain from the sump area shall have a total outlet capacity to handle Q100 and at least two (2) Q100 catch basins and laterals. 10. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe, measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 11. For pads below streets, the first 6 feet of the driveway should slope away from the right-of-way (back of sidewalk) elevation at no more than 6%. 12. Drainage from only one lot shall flow through only one other lot. Cross-lot drainage shall be contained in a concrete/rock lined swale or reinforced concrete pipe (12" minimum diameter). 13. Public improvement plans shall be 90 percent complete prior to the issuance of grading permits. Public improvement plans shall be 100 percent complete, signed by the City Engineer, and an improvement agreement and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance. Printed:10/.20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 13 Item F —17 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: —- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 14. LIVID plans shall incorporate attractive, low maintenance designs, compatible with or transitioning to adjacent landscape areas, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The maximum slope within publicly maintained landscape areas shall be 3:1. Where slopes occur, a 1-foot flat area behind the sidewalk shall be provided. Slopes higher than 6 feet shall have a 2-foot wide flat shelf at the top, along the base of wall. Slope widths should be minimized through the use of 30-inch maximum height freestanding retaining walls and up to 4 feet of retaining beneath perimeter walls. Low maintenance wall treatments should be used. Planting areas for shrubs should have a minimum width of 3 feet, clear of wall footings. Trees will require wider planting areas, as determined by the City Engineer. a. Public landscape areas are required to incorporate substantial areas (40%) of mortared cobble or other acceptable non-irrigated surfaces. 15. This project is connected to or will disrupt an existing City-maintained landscape and irrigation area. Prior to new construction, a joint inspection and documentation of the existing area's condition shall occur with both the new contractor and the City inspector. The existing irrigation system shall .be relocated as needed and any damaged landscaping replaced to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. At this point, the new construction contractor shall be responsible for maintenance of both the new and existing areas. The developer shall assume maintenance responsibility for thr altered landscape area for a minimum of 180 days after reconstruction. A follow-up inspection L both areas is required prior to the City's acceptance of the new area. 16. Landscaping outside the perimeter wall on Wilson Avenue will be installed per public improvement plans. A note to that effect should appear on the private on-site landscaping plans and no species should be called out for the LIVID area. The storm drain from Altura Drive shall be plotted on both the public and private landscape plans, since no trees will be allowed within 5 feet of the outside diameter of the pipe. Standard Conditions of Approval 17. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 18. Pursuant to . Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/20/2015 Page 6 of 13 Item F —18 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 • Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 20. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: Wilson Avenue. Printed:10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 13 Item F —19 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960- DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6'at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apa, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:10/20/2015 Page a of 13 Item F —20 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960- DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 ® Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 24. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend and construction notes (see below) shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 25. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. Fire Prevention I New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. This tract is located in the Fire Area designated: VHFHSZ. All the structures must be built in compliance with the current Edition of the 2013 CRC Section 327. The dwellings and garages must be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. The landscaping plans must be design per the RC FPD guidelines for the High Fire Area. Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan check submittal. Printed:10/20/2015 www.QtyofRC.us Page 9 of 13 Item F —21 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960- DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: a. Site/Plot Plan; b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); c. Floor Plan; d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams; f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping, and heating and air conditioning; and 3. Contractors must show proof of State and City licenses and Workers' Compensation coverage to the City prior to permit issuance. 4. Separate permits are required for fencing and/or walls. 5. NOTE: The construction of this tract must be in accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan and /or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 6. The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with th approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. 7. Construction of the home must be in accordance with Chapter 7A of the CBC/Section 327 of the CRC; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. 8.. Provide compliance with the California Residential/Code Building Code (CBC/CRC) for property line clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 9. Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required occupancy separations. 10. Roofing material shall be installed per the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. 11. The Building and Safety Official shall provide street addresses after tract/parcel map recordation and prior to issuance of Building Permits. 12. Construction activity shall not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through Saturday, with no construction on Sunday or holidays. 13. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential project or major addition, the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation Development Fee, Permit and Plan Check Fees, and School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees receipt to the Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. 14. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and approved prior to construction. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted California Codes, and all other applicable codes, ordinances, and regulations in effect at the time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and applicable handouts. www.QtyofRC.us Printed:10/20/2015 Page 10 of 13 Item F —22 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960- DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 2. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 3. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 4. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner ,and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) best management practices (BMP) devices. 6. The Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 7. If the depths of the rock BMP infiltration trenches are 10-feet or greater below grade the land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the underground infiltration pits to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 8. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). 9. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. 10. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent Printed:10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 13 Item F —23 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Prior to removing fences or walls along common lot lines and prior to constructing walls along common lot lines the applicant shall provide a letter from the adjacent property owner(s) allowing work on the adjacent property. 12. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 13. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification . Number(WDID). 14. If the depths of the rock BMP infiltration trenches are 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. 15. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 16. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plar. shall implement design recommendations per said report. 17. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 18. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 19. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 20. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, that plan shall be a separate plan/permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 22. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. 23. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. www.cityofRC.us Printed:10/20/2015 Page 12 of 13 Item F—24 Project#: SUBTT18960 DRC2015-00811 Project Name: SUBTT18960 - DCI Investments Location: --- 108726112-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall on property line or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 25. All slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way or adjacent private property. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the, latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Printed: 10/20/2015 www.CityofRC.us Page 13 of 13 Item F —25 Planning Commission Meeting of October 28, 2015 RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION SIGN-IN SHEET Please print your name, address, and city and indicate the item you have spoken regarding. Thank you. NAME ADDRESS CITY ITEM 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. HIGHLAND —HIGHLAND -- - -- ----- ---- - ----- -------- ----------------------- ------------------ iwand Specific_ Pian;_---- --- --- - ---- --- - - ---_--- 0 0//Or _ ; Y W r'' W W Ir / U i V I C TpR IA.PARK } VI C TOR IA i i- � i. f i i BASELINE eaSEL�rJE BASELINE Task Farce �r Study Area W - • F • L W JE tf� L) 9a CHURCH �l p Cr MIL'L'ER s� OF a a ��� 0 Ir • f.jr,M ! GROVE '_..r'..-.... I' r��; m 431 ' 1 I SAPPHIRE � I BAKER x I CARNELIAN m � � J—VINEYARD x �/00 1 BERYL s H HELLMAN (I 1 D AMETHYST � � I x O ARCHIBALD IjI rn —HERMOSA o S� z r. m 1 O .. = m p A _ i HAVEN Z O 4 X m SPRUCE ' X M-c I f ' ELM + ' MIL'LIKEN y • I S z —ROCHESTER 5 I SANTA•ANITA �� �yy DAY-GREE t �i� s m z � • c> 7 ■ e ETIWANDA �; ETIWANDA� ETNVANDA•i + zl ! v m i s 1 4ERj A 1 f -..-.._.._. EAST­ii— ' j a z ! -VON on,X WARDMAN,BULCOCKCH m rA m Vl m n lei Historic Preservation / Planning Commission Director ' s Report WINERY THEME ARCHITECTURE IN THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA/ETIWANDA AREA i lormak i i ipham a- Low w " ,w] tkeov go RANCHO CUCAMONGA Historic Preservation/Planning Commission Meeting October 28, 2015 Presentation Agenda • Staff Report and PowerPoint Presentation • Review of historical photos and data of local wineries • Discussion of "Winery Architecture" in our local area • Comment from the Commission regarding "Winery Architecture" Report Background ------ C Base Line Etiwanda Historic Task Force • Formed as an advisory group to discuss architecture and land uses in 9 areas within the Base Line Road / Etiwanda area that were near or adjacent to known historic sites . • Membership consisted of 2 Councilmembers , 2 Commissioners and the City Planner • Met on an "as needed" basis in 2004 through 2008 x Winery Theme Architecture October 28, 2015 N N Ln � N 4) 9 t Q� Q // ,I 4-J L/ I li1 L g N 'i U s+ 'Ir _.i •4 N Wt ti:V" 4 T• •1:r. J m mIN111 v r N L C0 T L Qt Base Line Etiwanda Historic Task Force Study Areas CIS - XxiMuxU pGXlAxo iwand /pecPlan © © 0 Q N4 tiF1'wF fl45EhIXE O 845E'emE ® Task Force Study Area ' 9-yp+ Cl1UxCX� �� ANN N LocalWinery1 Examples 1 . Thomas Brothers Winery (formerly Cucamonga Rancho Winery) 2 . Virginia Dare Winery (formerly Garrett and Company Winery) 3 . Opici Winery 4. Filippi Winery (formerly Ellena Regina Winery) 5 . Rancho De Philo Winery 6. Biane Winery (8th Street location) 7. Aggazzotti Winery Winery Architecture Examples I 8. Mitchell Family Residence and Winery 9. Cucamonga Pioneer Winery 10. Campanella, Guidera, and DiCarlo Vineyard Lands 11 . Etiwanda Grape Products 12 . Etivista Winery 13 . Big Bear Winery I •�GR PVNIRf �N`• BANTER - 1 1 � CAPAELIAN i VINEYARD j • � BERYL ' 1 - 1 11 - -HELLMAN I I AMETHYST I A E • ARMS ALL 1•• --m—e NERNO6A '^ i O HAVEN � p • '.. m z , n p 3PI CEm fL NLLINEA I �•.•.•.�. J1 N31AVN s g ' ® �ROCNE6TER �—i I S � 1 6AHTAANITA9> I ' Qt A DAtlCPEEN • 1 I x i n I i S ; ® ETRAN'OA E =.. ETNYANOA• El•ANO"l - TI I 3 � A 1 -..-,.-•-- FAST � I 9 wAgoNAx-euuocH F 1 I —CHERR • yrY •••••••••••••I I m T • SW `SZ jago;oo ajn)oajigojy awagl tiau!M uoiIanaIsuoa pooh :pasrl slupavpw sauinadpa6 lAoddns 01 s!IlaaI 1panianals aldwiS •aauanljul uap8 :awaql 1panjaajlyaay f anuany papAau!A pup papnalno8 ' II!gIOOJ Jo aauaoa ISP@gIlou ayj Ip paxpDo] (AaaulM opup�j pbuouapan:)) AJaulM saaqjoae S2WO _L O - �� � ee . m . \ 6E@12g24woa (uo:)) tau|M Sig4jois5EW04± >� �•�� ^�\ may. \ � . *0*1-4z/ am . , .. � ® � � 7 > e \ ) D § >� : 4-J, + 5 ,r E 2 EE % �/ ® .0k \ ) j \ \ � } \ ) \ > uU Located at 6440 Mayberry, on the north side of Highland Avenue (site now JIM developed with Vineyard Jr. F High School) t n Architectural Theme: µ Unknown .. tAd AVMaterials Used: Unknown Constructed: Winery first :M established in 1948. .. . Original construction burned in the 1950s and later replaced-date unknown October 28, 2015 O - Located at Base Line Road east :x `�' � Fili of Day Creek Boulevard � �` "' � Undefined/Mediterranean "�, .. Materials Used: Stucco, red � k . k Constructed: 1922 1 ` • • (formerly Located at: 10050 Wilson j' � a'�8 i ' ,^'i • � anti +• V - ia Architectural Theme: , � , F Mission Style t�.,, `' •, , Materials Used: Stucco � �' � • � � � � walls, Red the roof, decorative the accents +� Constructed: 1974 ''± - Rancho• - Philo Winery Winery Theme Architecture October 28,2015 w r' i t;7�! 1^rrf. f.. Biane Winery (Padre Winery) Located at the southeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Rochester Avenue Architectural Theme: Stone vernacular AO Materials Used: Brick, river rock, clay tile a� Constructed: 1938 Winery Theme Architecture October 28,2015 ; ,. ',. • WINES ANO „ . Located at the southeast � �s. zjt i'! •�� , corner of Foothill Boulevard � Y ` � , 4 � •" r• • '' � and Rochester Avenue � .;.t� ` � � ' 1 1 ` Aggazotti • Winery Theme Architecture October 28;3015 Located at: 1021 3 Foothill � � f Boulevard Architectural Theme: - -�" Craftsman with Italianate influence Constructed: 1918 ;, '; Materials Used: Wood �£ frame rw Located at: 881 2 Haven Avenue Architectural Theme: Barn - �'" . , ,�" _- influence warehouse with ►��� . . + vertical wood siding and ��.: ',, Before attached grape arbor `�'� Materials Used: Wood - • After i Constructed: 1905 -- • "- limit Cucamonga ' • (formerly vinery Theme Architecture - October 2$;:2015 Located at: Current location of the Foothill Marketplace (60 acres) N iglio Architectural Theme: Barn influence and warehouses Materials Used: Brick base topped with wood Constructed: 191 Os-1920s Notable Observations: Two of the family homes are in � � the Craftsman style and . g�•ir were relocated to Main '�'' �r ` " ' Street in 1992 "� Campanella, s , and DiCarlo Vineyard Lands Winery Theme Architecture October 28, 2015 Located at: 9370 Etiwanda'' Avenue *' ' Architectural Theme: Barns 41 with gambrel roofline Materials Used: Undetermined x Constructed: 1920s(?) Notable observations: Etiwanda wineries often were composed of a dwelling, warehouse and manufacturing building and barns or sheds for wagons, vehicles and equipment. The house is in the Craftsman style. Winery Theme Architecture October 28, 2015 R_5 s0£6 t :pai:)nalsuOD •aulljooi payaxid Mol •6ulpls pat?oq JUDIJAan alduals 411M uoijupunol alaa:)uoa asuq wAoj :pasfl sieuaieh s :auaayl l�an�aa�!4aad paenalnog Ill4xooi tZZZ L-ZbLZ L Ie paW:)O� R Located at: Southeast ,� r: .�• ��, corner of Foothill Boulevard and the 1-15 Freeway (Foothill Marketplace) ��" 'N4, " Architectural Theme: Non- descript Materials Used: Brick, - concrete, wood Constructed: Unknown Notable Observations: It , may not have been , uncommon for the "Retail Dept" to also serve as the public tasting room - a modest add-on to the warehouse. Winery Theme Architecture October 28, 2015 Common Architectural Themes • The majority lacked architectural detail and or theme particularly in the Etiwanda area • Often boxy/ barnlike structures using available materials such as rock, stone, and wood or a combination of concrete or stone foundations with upper levels constructed in wood • Later forms of construction included stucco exterior walls and sheds of various descriptions 8 Winery Econ • Largely poor immigrants from Italy and France, the wineries lacked architectural detail / small family owned businesses • Money spent often went into the homes of the landowner and not the winery/ manufacturing buildings • Elaborate winery design such as the Virginia Dare Winery was for the few that were wealthy prior to the construction of the winery A Winery Theme Architecture October 28,2015 Discussion Points • Discuss the commonalities and differences of the local winery architectural themes • Discuss the level of importance staff should place upon specific design or architectural feature(s) found in the local winery architecture 5 Winery Theme Architecture October 28,2015 StOZ 18Z aago;a0 amaoaj!yojy awagl/Gaut.M i y r In" uoij,epuawwo:)aNd