Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-05-08 Supplementals - PC-HPC
City of Rancho Cucamonga Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2019/20 Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Engineering Services Department May 8, 2019 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) • CIP consists of a multi -year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. • CIP addresses both City's long and short-term capital needs. • CIP prepares annually and approved as part of the budget process. CI P for Fiscal Year 2019/20 • Projects are categorized by type (landscape, drainage, facilities) • Projects programmed are funded from various sources (Measure I, Gas Tax, SB1, Development Impact Fees) Sources of Funding for FV 2019-20 • Projects identified in the CIP: • 62 projects funded under $79M • 22 projects future and/or unfunded over $26M $25 5350,000 Sn,000 Sso,000 r. „ 5350,000 ss.0oc $52,150, 0 ■SB-1 TCEP 0 Underground Utilities ■ Road Maim & Rehab ■Gas Tax R&T 73fi0 • Measure I ■6tywide Infrastructure •ADM2 CDBG • Beautification Key Projects for Fiscal Year 2019/20 • Key projects include: • Advance Traffic Management System (ATMS) • Etiwanda Ave Grade Separation • RCMU Electric and Fiber Line Extensions Al M5 Phase 1 A I IVI5 F'nase L Planning Commission Action • Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. Fiscal Year 2otg-2o Capital Improvement Program Presen2d ov: City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department rrr r f � General Plan Policies Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Plan Design Review DRC2018-00594 Project Overview • Applicant: Lord Constructors for CMB Structures, Inc. • Project: A request to modify an approved 15,821 square foot warehouse distribution building to increase the floor area to 17,200 • Parcel Size:.89 acre • Zoning: General Industrial (GI) • Floor Area Ratio (FAR):.40 percent (max permitted FAR = .60 percent) • Development Code: Fully compliant with related Development Code requirements wvww .�. - MIS i .�.._ ��—►- a A.r O ,. ■ROIL . --ft R I W.V Site/Landscape Plan Development Criteria Minimum Requirement Provided Hellman Avenue Setback 25 Feet 25 Feet Feron Boulevard Setback 25 Feet 25.5 Feet Side Setback Interior 5 feet 68 Feet Rear Setback 0 Feet 3.5 Feet Parking Setback 25 Feet 25 feet-4.5 Inches Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 19 Percent Floor Area Ratio Maximum 60 Percent 44 Percent Parking Overview Parking Ratio Floor Area in Square Feet Required Parking Provided Parking Office 1/250 SF 3,283 SF 14 14 Warehouse 1/1,000 SF 13,917 SF 14 14 Total 28 28 North Elevation (Feron Boulevard) South Elevation 1 East Elevation West Elevation (Hellman Avenue) M �"i Design Review Committee • The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Wimberly, and Smith) on March 19, 2019. The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. Public Art The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $17,200 or pay an in -lieu fee to the City's public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. Utility Undergrounding • The applicant has submitted a letter requesting to pay the undergrounding in -lieu fee rather than undergrounding the above ground utilities as required in the Standard Conditions. • The applicant's reasoning for paying the in -lieu fee is that the frontage of the project street being less than 300 feet, the area around the project site being substantially built out and the cost of undergrounding the above -ground utilities. • Planning Commission Resolution No. 87-96 outlines circumstances under which the Planning Commission may decide that undergrounding is impractical. • Such circumstances include a short length of undergrounding, a heavy concentration of services to other users or disruption of existing improvements. Reasons to Require Utility Undergrounding • City has a goal to remove unsightly overhead utility lines. • City paid in -lieu fee when developing the maintenance yard across the street to assist in paying the undergrounding costs across the street. • The total length of utility ungrounding is 340 feet, which is greater than the 300 foot example given as a short length of required undergrounding. • It is more cost effective to underground the utilities while constructing the required street improvement. • The vacant lot to the north will also be required to underground their overhead utilities. • The City has rencently undergrounded shorter runs of overhead utilities including Los Amigos Park. Environmental Determination • The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under CEQA. • This exemption covers project sites less than 5 acres in area and that comply with zoning designation and regulations. • The applicant has submitted environmental studies demonstrating that the project would not have an impact on traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. Recommendations Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review Modification DRC2018-00594, through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. RESOLUTION NO.06-111 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2006-00513,, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MASTER PLAN FOR AN OFFICE PARK CONSISTING OF 4 BUILDINGS TOTALING 97,300 SQUARE FEET ON 7,36 ACRES OF LAND IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT (SUBAREA 6) WITHIN THE HAVEN AVENUE OVERLAY DISTRICT, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND JERSEY BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-143-02. A. Recitals, 1. Rock -Jersey, LLC fled an application for the approval of Development Review DRC2006-00513, as described in'the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Development Review request is referred to as 'the application." 2. On the 13th day of December 2006, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE; It is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set -forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on December 13, 2006, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at the southeast comer of Haven Avenue and Jersey Boulevard, with an approximate street frontage of 876 feet along Haven Avenue and an approximate street frontage of 299 feet on Jersey Boulevard. The parcel is. vacant with no structures; and b. The property to the north of the subject site is developed with a gas station and a car wash and is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District; the property to the south consists of office and industrial buildings and Is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District; the property to the east is developed with mini -storage buildings and is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6); and the property to the west, across Haven Avenue, contains industrial buildings, vacant land, and the Cucamonga Pioneer Winery and is zoned Industrial Park (Subarea 6) within the Haven Avenue Overlay District; and c. The applicant is proposing to construct 4, two-story office buildings, consisting of one medical building (Building 1) and three office buildings (Buildings 2-4), which are permitted uses within the Industrial Park and Haven Overlay District; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 06-111 DRC2006-00513 — ROCK -JERSEY, LLC December 13, 2006 Page 7 10) Provide sidewalk easements on the parcel map whenever the sidewalks cross ttie drive approaches outside the street right-of-way. 11) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of any and all existing overhead utilities such as CATV, electrical and telephone, except for the 66 kV electrical on Haven Avenue and except for the existing underground telephone on Jersey Boulevard, shall be collected for the Developer's sides, (east side) of Haven Avenue and (south side) of Jersey Boulevard. Said fees shall be paid to the City, as calculated and shown on exhibit "G", prior to the issuance of building permits or the award of the City's Haven Avenue Grade Separation Improvement Project, whichever comes first. However, the first 10% (or documented actual design costs) of the fee shall be paid within 30 days of Planning Commission approval of these conditions. Note: Telephone will be undergrounded along Haven Avenue by the utility at their cost with the Haven Grade Separation Project. No other undergrounding fees or costs shall be required on Jersey Boulevard. 12) The developer shall execute a line extension agreement for the electrical service and shall construct electrical distribution facilities in accordance with such agreement and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility requirements and, dedicate such facilities to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility shall be the electrical service provider and will provide a service connection to the site no later than June 1, 2007. 13) The corner property line cutoff shall be dedicated per the City Standards. 14) The Jersey Boulevard street parkway shall slope at 2 percent from the top of the curb to 1 foot beyond the property line adjacent sidewalk along all street frontages. Join on -site grading with a maximum 2:1 slope. 15) Provide a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, and Identify applicable Best Management Practices (BMPs) on the grading plan. a) Maintenance of BMP's identified in the WQMP shall be addressed in the project CC&R's. 16) Process a revision to add a private storm drain connection to the existing public storm drain in Utica Avenue. Suggested plans to consider revising include Drawing No. 1143 or sheet 30 of Drawing No. 1049. Private storm drain. plans and studies will be reviewed by Building and Safety. Provide a reference copy to the Engineering Department. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0. 06-111 DRC2006-Oo513—ROCK-JERSEY., LLC 'December 13, 2006' Page 13 6: The. Secretary to this Cc mmission $hall'certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND'ADOPTED THIS 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER.,2006, PLANNING SSION OF.THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA: ' BY:. Pam ewart, Chairman' . . ATTEST: Je s R. Troyer, AICP,'Sec tary ];James R: Troyer, AICP; Secretaryof the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed; and adopted bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2006; by the following vote -to -wit: - AYES:' COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, MACIAS, .McPHAIL, MUNOZ, STENAR7 NOES: . COMMISSIONEM NONE ' ABSENT; -COMMISSIONERS: NONE 00 Y _ A I IV r' ^0o J, i •� � n . �{ kk CGfd y. ,> 3 Ptn. SJ/2, Sec.12, T.IS.*-,R.7W-.,• S.B.BAM. Ail A A TP - 11, Pare. 14 SA 01. 14.1 ?CFCe VIC. Al. 13.4, V PCtre Vat 4.1, 1 ?65$ . F •-v 71 1 23?, P. V. I 36111 fcfco VIA 44.[j 151 P:3. Fly ;41 VC) 17 9 T . PC I C 4 vqr U. I is 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga 0209— 14 Tax Rote Area 15015 15051 11F.M.E.;rs 2 1 7 A A 1 1. It 0 4 4 . It I - A I —�L n2F Assessor's Map Book 0209 Page 14 San Bernardino County I S/S Jersey Blvd. east of Haven Ave. I rPCt)rd `r 11 RESOLUTION NO.07-64 0 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THEIR APPROVAL OF DRC2003-01185 AN OFFICE COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 11 BUILDINGS TOTALING 126,843 SQUARE FEET ON 7.27 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT (SUB AREA 5), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-211.19. A. Recitals. 1. On the 23rd day of March 2005, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on an application for DRC2003-01185 and concluded said hearing on that date. Following the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission conditionally approved DRC2003-01185 through adoption of Resolution No. 05-85. 2. Mark Capellino of Cap Brothers Construction Company, on behalf of Trade Union International, filed a request to modify the conditions of approval for DRC2003-01185 requiring undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities and instead require payment of in lieu fee for the utility lines. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject request is referred to as "the application." 3. On the 26th day of September 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and continued the said public hearing to October 24, 2007. 4. On the 24th day of October 2007, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 5. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution, NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on September 26th and October 24th, 2007, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to the property located at 9850 6th Street with a combined street frontage of 665 feet on 6th Street and is presently improved with eleven office/warehouse buildings with a combined floor area of 126,843 square feet; and b. The previously adopted conditions of approval, specifically Engineering Department Special Condition No. 3, required the undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities along 6th Street, pursuant to this Commission's Resolution No. 87-96; and C. On June 10, 1987, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87.96 establishing a revised policy for undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities. This policy was PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-64 MODIFICATION OF DRC2003-01185 — 9850 6TH STREET October 24, 2007 Page 2 intended "to remove unsightly existing overhead utility lines in orderto promote a more aesthetic and desirable working and living environment within the City." The Resolution states that the policy applies to all developments except those specifically exempted "and any others specifically waived by the Planning Commission." Overhead utilities include telecommunication (phone and cable) and electrical but excludes 68KV or larger electrical lines; and d. The Commission's utility undergrounding policy includes seven exemptions; however, the development project did not qualify for any of these exemptions; and e. The adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 05-24 contains an Engineering Department condition dealing with utility undergrounding. Condition No. 3 requires undargrounding on the project side of 6th Street along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15948 from the first pole off -site east and west. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included forthe environmental assessment forthe application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations, a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Negative Declaration on March 23, 2005, in connection with the City's approval of ORC2003-01185 Pursuantto CEQAGuidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important "(rlreie!! ation shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered,'ddttional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigatioh meacan be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the current application, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Negative Declaration. The current application requests the modification of a condition requiring utility undergrounding. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. The proposed modification of the utility undergrounding will not change the project design. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record, the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the current application. 4. Based upon the findings set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, the Planning Commission hereby modifies their previous action approving DRC2003-01185 by deleting Engineering Department Special Condition No. 3 and replacing it with the following: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 07-64 MODIFICATION OF ORC2003-01185 — 9850 6TH STREET October 24, 2007 Page 3 An in -lieu fee of the construction cost shall be deposited with the City for the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (electrical and Southern California Edison communication lines, except for the 66kV electrical) along the entire project frontage of both Parcels 1 and 2 of PM15946. The in -lieu fee of the construction cost shall be based upon the Clty's current adopted amount of $259. DO per foot for electrical lines plus $51.00 per foot for communication lines. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2007. PLANNING CfGQN) SSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a ATTEST: Corkran Nicholson, Acting Secretary I. Corkran Nicholson, Acting Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of October 2007, by the following vote -to - wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: FLETCHER, HOWDYSHELL, MUNOZ, STEWART, WIMBERLY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ASSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE r, ITT E rJ rJ - 1N u I� /r} d11 ul cow e4i IOU of oieq Nollo 7(-3d--Ul'aew a4l loo of eje4 10!10 •� `1��r �mrn F _ r pit _ FIE t ice. 1IN _ n xriio N ! *. .,(\Q i mot.. t � f rr r _ .I �roxw-- r sis 9860 6th Street 9860 6th Street P4(0r-� Card RESOLUTION NO. 90-134 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14486 LOCATED AT 9874 AND 9892 ARROW ROUTE IN THE MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (8-14 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE), AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF APN: 208-311-03, 04, 21, AND 24. A. Recitals. ( i ) L.P.C. Corporation, Inc. has filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 14486 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 00 On the loth of October 1990, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. (iii) All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that ail of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on. October to, 1990, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby.specifically finds as follows: (a) The application applies to property located at 9874 and 9892 Arrow Route with a street frontage of 225 feet and lot depth of 616 feet and is presently improved with two single family residences; and (b) The property to the north of the, subject site consists of single family homes, the property to the south of that site consists of single family homes, the property to the east is a church, and the property to the west consists of single family homes. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: T�,, E PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 90-134 TT 14486 - L.P.C. CORPORATION, INC. October 10, 1990 Page 3 Further, if the affected School District has not formed a Mello -Roos Community Facilities District within twelve months of the date of approval of the project and prior to the recordation of the final map or issuance of building permits for said project, this condition shall be deemed null and void. This condition shall be waived if the City receives notice that the applicant and the affected School Districts have entered into an agreement to privately accommodate any and all school impacts as a result of this project. Engineering Division: 1) An in -lieu fee as contribution to the future undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of Building Permits. The fee shall be the full City adopted unit amount times the length of the project frontage (222 1 feet). 2) Easements for reciprocal and/or emergency access shall be provided in favor of the property to the west. 3) The existing drive approaches on Arrow Route shall be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. 4) Landscaping and other obstructions within the "areas of concern" defined by the lines of sight for the project driveway shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 5) "No Stopping Any Time" signs shall be installed along the Arrow Route frontage. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS IOTII DAY OF OCTOBER 1990, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. '90-134 TT 14486 - L.P.C. CORPORATION, INC. October 10, d990 • Page 4hi Tarry. ry. iel, Chairman ATTEST:. ad' ller reta I; Brad Buller, Secretary of the Pl,anni,ng Commission of., the. .City.' of Rancho Cucamonga" :do hereby ..certify that'the foregoing Resolution' was duly' and "regularly introduced, passed, and:adopted;by the Planning Commission of' the Ci ty,of Rancho Cucamonga; at a.regular .me'eting of the Planning Commission held; on the ].Oth-day of October 1990,.by the following vote=to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: CHITIEA, MCNIEL, MELCHER, TOLSTOY NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE , ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS,:• NONE - _ - - ® x � r-v- . � P _. .. ... .�..�.�._ r.. v 0© ® ® fir" iA44AP le (eA tp[PUAICSE Ptn. N.W.1/4, Sec.11! T.1S.,R.7W., S.B.B.&M. City of Rancho Cucamonga 0208-31 01 Ao vA,necx urerow nxlr. _ Tax Rafe Area 15013 e • __ 11U b: n OI! dO l Y u n I 1 i.6 r I ' A-nz, ! R h n n s; Ia I,. a !Ji _ f)I.a! e I , I I I r< - I P 3i:: Yo.. i4486. 8.0. 248Y33-34, Condce A'in :Ict, E3-3!I;x' NewN 2M Trae: U. 10563. ➢.8_ IWI 3 Assessor's Map Book 0208 Page 31 San Bernardino County 9874 & 9892 Arrow Route S le w t .C?O}f]r tfs.rS, e® •+ } f��_,�,_r �a - yj.sei 3 ry ram: rt� f `y 1111'w 'a �' � •3 � :ts•: '� .4 :'a•1 � Its �- wa y :• -' � � ,Jf. - /s AG]r ` — — - f r .. C #L •� i .� • 1�> i rG:�. ! `ice MCI 411 fr•r+r,4rosOv f•' -` +i y�` {�*�r.'�� ; Y - �=}i��ry '�-x�■, If fir! 114. � � - F LM1 *yi �r •a+a„'IFS �': e' •�1� p'4 } O� , �. r too* Overhead Utility Lines d a.c •~ I• �. •{ of r` } r *, ' r m'd'•�•L' '�. ➢� .r-.# -�. 'h'1 • r •.lfi` �ZL, a .-,• • ^ - - ... +.,US ury,1. rVrar C_ Tr 7Y ..r:'i ^.j ay - P7.� •y '�.:.. 5: � #. sue• r- `'TyT •r`»�.•� _'#`.,.f `f� , � •I U. X104a- '° PO i �• r ,(J'Ar«'1 y! '+4� .r T Pk r T `C •.xi '•'. r`1> 'V. -<-'t r y J �. •fir .1' x Y- is L� 'r trb r ,r` s '-r,r a :-� .j• ii '' -. _4 •r .'F`a �`�� h'�f a•Z„�s' - -�t �1 +wLfJ,t {■ '�-•��r .L'\,�{�`Nf it 'L:JR ram:,. i- r r" •sue. '•�s �i- �� �••" '� s �'. .��i t-.fra+- v r- �y- � •N7'.'x• `.+ . ',•"' . r S� - .r /� �`f{�0.+ .t r, r'�zFr �6- i f•1� � r+ , � ��'U}t� r .• l'.i��ir�rriF.-]i - � „•; •+►ti' fw.. a �1t+'':� ..`i�: '�. ,.=:+:�_+��: •(. .� �+'.x .�- il�r; •f.� r r# �.- a. t 'w .. _-�:. .di •_--�-•�'"F. �.' ;'S4�.'". 'j R.'' :■ y Lw�A!� �W jw, .� a`y .a d�' +u d-•*i� *;tT # rF`l4si. •h .. S f.f 1 r. .4i.'t�L yt#tr !<^ate! r�,w� r.:• , ,�•_vr't' - ./a ,Y„� yr• 44[.' f.• %" 'ri r, f+a� •'.:.7rt >r •1 '` .p Al..;�, • l.kr :1.- tL. •r { } �;�1 .+ 'c,. r 14- i- 4., r'M r•+h+ r • ` :• r r �:s{ F� ;,r l a� •X +"C ••tea } fc-_.,• s7 rL {+r+•-L,�, F_ irPaa�. .r. jog,,, i s+� , #, .}+r L, r er as>t,, h in J. % (s }+ ►a• + �4 � �. so.,q� ✓ • ��•,•'� `.i , 7ri!f•.\ r,.� +,.,. ,� �: ., "s_f •1/: l LY.. Y - ±S e t r: p • C7 •4? 'L_y -'tea '* _ •r. r ; r .%'. J• '�'� / �SJI ar• `(!� }}1i� ..4..P_9 •Iri+. ya.-i• i' # �7}?h�- � 7d; %! � •- �" JL ,. "l�, �t� r G`jt r�r„'tip' ��:.tis ■c+..rr_ 'r ti 4'•; k rA1 9 f f•YCJ•'1 4 ra +.l1�4., ,�.� +.�.Y I y� 4a k��L. _.. q '1+„'` •r p�i,�r- r ` . .J` ' r -1.r4` Gr�mO C •a ,: .Imo_ } i' LA 7ty. ": ? 'ter' r•r, kY.<{ 47 .�` ;{r :,' �� `'{.'r �=i• } 7 �.;�-.�r ��'`, i '. y�i„ =�fenSt r�: r pr IL ~ilk sr� t1Slft'Aff w�= ,ijC ;•:r x E^f�f'a`rt �.. .r �:: ;mac' �7 a �^ 164 r' year a� 1 :a i a A r' `Jr<a a' • rr• ' •r�. wi'j •'• - .R.s. F � � fir. _ ++� � t••a-` ,f . � �. Tf;`7 r -' I _ •� :rT�,:♦ Q "d Ilarcol'J-Ik\U r L" ��L Jr M•r4 '1 '- i!• / ;- J '.F rx l; a i ` �{�•Z�", r �• {�; Yr � f' i.r ` 771"1-r 1 : J[a'lliJ,�rtr.i.li . .Z -�. a� ' s�r��irr� I �5:�t': " Tr t' trf , rr or do tGa /. r y� R• ic>r+.aL `rtw T=.1 •,..•.:} �`�` ;f '� may• a ��. r* f i � • .F �. '� ...r�,:..:.r •r•+_ i :R'i� `- A • - I'r7 '� J.`•F� H*M t` rF. �i: K rr+ 4.L = TM w= .n r� YT r �1,�• '„ -C loom ��tl If .4"7i '� y++�. • _.. . �ti �. .: t ,,J1 } , .a' a r , ?,�lr'1,�� �rf f, fx,fFw '�� � 1f +�1 !_4 •II +2 _,3.t •i.••.;�� �� +��rF •t •} .:��i �:�r [xti }Ia i/tl� � l � �3'L �jtl +�' - ..�.,,■+,5� •+,fir r t � � S� �. � .li - efJy+ � � 7_• ti�-T a-+ -' ]ra•,sT=�}�f�� '� ' �_11 +x �•:'-+�_i` :�}f�# s pay`�'�'�r,'i'.aJ�`��• s +�rryl' jog • i. _ �i.t'-e- i +� i� ' iL r-rrr .:rr *' '1 r� : -.� + a• fill �•,t 7:ryTSO- Lam. r ♦ - yr_,,ra . x # iya_---�_.._ ti�' '1 R�i�) ' f �`r•� `y ♦` _�� � r � �- : .. # 7'-1*- .r. x A }�� r��a+e, :*1 I1.R• 3 y•,'''.':y 1.r i ♦rrwa�yY_ ` f Rf 'r!�''-m . i t �i��.w?,r r r�* .:'• = +r- _,_i: a„� _ .0 / 1-cil 't• •, a.r 4� r" * /♦ I t iv - ` '`' Y J ._rOr'C_C 1• r .. _ i=,s e~ . a.+r- «' _-- - `"=qE--ri• ': •a . • : i3; ^ .`.. a. �■ _ ,: �r {,i ; r �' , ry�r '.X d � w. Y • .. r� �, ♦ y. 411Y• !.-i lea nt'.c.�rt+ -,- .M1 i_ut o-tf '� .. aJ K1a 1 J i. _, r:�A �•' •� ` } w.Y t. *" _, .ry.•r►-�: rr. ,e+ �rF; �r`� ,'.�'i 4. `+ .,rx, .. •, i .�` . •t..k.�s,J L a L a �- �. _ ^ '�•. �i-.fw T;y: =i -- i � li.Yxi - _ af- -yrr'� `� i"�_,a_.,�y .. s {�y _ - 'y !�Y}-, -: ...l �f�•. rT,, � � ' # ''• � {. . r �'} r �£� _ t % r S r_.._ r,lIJill • LP _ _��. a f ;_ *-ti e#4`F '' V,�� r , ` I..-(J�%1�ss�•crt?'iiG D. r a If JALL St Ek 'N lint ��jFl}4FYtr _w4 _+�,. "w•�■? � rt - 1 �' 'Jr' rn t Ia•t I r J Z ' ;s L� .� ri x • r• -1 •1' .r '. �i t1 •• y5- , n } I_ .}' '+r�' ra,...�••f ; (01 �� i a..s -..^•�s:rt •i= � 01 l v �,� s i •'�r - • r�a i - 7L�r.'rt; F r � •4 �ti YY4' r �a�r' . Via. re .i �..1 ,: rrs!'fi1_ F";'✓t`C. { _ �. •+�f•fsr ,�'i �f ii`!} 6ay��aRY .+. # ...�� - -t •.��.t J r••.t'rwj `ri Eilf cJr.im 41 r• •ti`�r� may? r'#t-rLC►r". a�+F• �+ bAr ^�c►alT`+tr ,�.. tti,s%a� �L � Js a':rr.r�ir 11`'•-.iUQa�,, "/ .. rfsy '••� `� T3* �•'G1.a F�C;C��rS s��tr��. �� r F . .a-r i""• a d f 7 . �,I +`4� iG'.�G� . 1 irf la" r� p i r /Aw.CTJ Cc�fl'E O r..�t .e'er tom_ .,ra_i 1r,>�rLY "': `'_� 15-�.fi ri"►. ia'Y { # } �r.�1�y •'�.r 'S e;� • �• A r.,C!�' r _ 1 „�.J] '� f t�±, Icer.ts ; - r� � � �.�'- '>,.y � r r�r# •• • '= • : - k_ �.. q.Y'- y. �4� .. 7�4,�, Mrr. .■ .a:ri �' L� +jp'. ta o •+..W�-r !. L -Y i{ "•.r': �;r..k R '�,' 1ri-r :ia- • r ..4.ti` + L'r?4• r;.?L �ti r �S' r •:4 � :P:f. fti �■� `�� � i1 'r :� ity�• _ •i V • f -® �_ Fr: � ' ; r Jr t� r -� i �1 sei,• ' ` �• . 4 : � t *• � } i�+ F r R '' �4T r t ■ .. ,.# r,r�.+, r � �. Alt •'�'r'i4 M' � t� j � J ` : 3 �3 r ._�` ` � : • `a f ' # _s f ` ' x Rf`i it ..-•'�� • i ` �,' r '7"•i r-.7.a�.r.•.x i r fa .+ •T ¢ +<CJ:. a••.'.�f.fi�-8i�wk]rc�� ^7C'- ry .• a'r- ' Krrt.+r .L.i: •' iV L. A. r n �h. •+ti •5 - j 4 * faW ZYaiAS f a rE = S { 1. a i• ='"cam-'� G]E.; tf ��.� •af : = "f•. t.:rt�• f+f-_r �` - `_� ,� y, ar i j ae �' ..r '� _. ,�%s Up a �+ iC] J.- r... ��/]+ ;:F t Y-Y� r: J►.4 ♦,;n r' lrr�i � {} � „4 4 h ,.. ,�:� (L's _ _rr .CC ` C7" d -r C .. r■, �.' , _. 4-rft}�•#�• r.'f,�,,.1� t f }_�� a. ,, ••�I.r� -� -: Ji �`t 7,/� s E �Tr Ly fr aa•t`� �..� r r,.J Js �y ts'�il f1\•1 '� u �"5: •-aa 4:���.T�=�-�! �T'•:'�.L•� ��„�t-�s�f.••ii !1`+'r, :. �Uc•at��a•��+�' v:■J `�' _ - w v* v-•* --' -`_' o. or-J- t '�i +�• Y �' • .�.. .t •. -~'n, H 'ft !!r al •. il��e_a {�, �•►'J� 4k:a'4ai •+�� ♦ s• f 7 " i { :� 'ff 'rtf rT a.s�l': lTi1 j' ,3. \ A# �Y �. i-u�; �4 �,i *, r. r'.` �+► e S 1 •.f r �,�� r�7 ff r1t�1• t rltii ,� Z,' A arm ,•r` c f r'L a�`t� i t a�i rf.a c•a} : tJ ?. =� i 7.NT'A.rA' t �� rr 1':'�F., F�-'y. ,s �' w �la:'.y!= � A� rl�l '�� 7<F 1 rF ~• 1:��;■ �: i�. w'•"" i. �•ti` f 4x r �•'Et a�a�: ,,' T■M'*tls :1��� f /aai1� *.-No •�' a Ca] {�}M �• ,tlrs7� i,tili -I r . It ;•+• { .�>� .}�,! 'r r. •r� -.syata•-a+� � � - 130go'a•i•i�jCI.%'IV. 4' . a`.s�l3).�.,l«i�.�•ili?rA.l1.I��.1 �+•.-4 aE ��:, �11t+ :F. •1 Zti .,., 1994?