Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2019-04-24 Supplementals - PC-HPC
Six-Month Review of Lazy Dog CUP Modification Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00471 for Lazy Dog Restaurant located at 11560 4th Street April 24, 2019 r y`J rO Yom* 0 C z O J o RuffaIOIA s fiuffaln Ave Q Ir ear" X f y I'M 44 V r or Cirx! 1 � y Q) 73 Ll a 41- _ "� + } o � _ mj� "u' L� L Background • On October 10, 2018, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit Modification DRC2018-00471 : • Lengthened Sunday operational hours of Lazy Dog from 11 am - 12 midnight to 9am to 12 midnight. • Allowed the sale take-out sealed beer and wine. Background • Condition of Approval No. 2 on Planning Commission Resolution No. 15-66 states: This Conditional Use Permit shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission to evaluate the operations of the approved subject use(s) and modifications to verify/determine compliance with this application's Conditions of Approval. The review shall occur 6 months from the date of the adoption of Resolution No. 18-66. During this review, the Planning Commission may consider modifications to the conditions of approval, additional conditions of approval, or revocation of the approval. Police Department Input • Lazy Dog had 20 calls for service within the past 6 months, a majority of which invoice transients loitering around the area. • No increase in calls for service within the last 6 months. • Calls for service for Lazy Dog and surrounding shopping center remain relatively low. Conclusion/Recommendation • Based on feedback from the Police Department, the approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00471 did not have any negative impacts related to public health, safety, and welfare. • Applicant is considered to be in full compliance with approved Conditional Use Permit. • Staff recommends that the Planning Commission receive and file this report. No further action is necessary. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD & CONSERVATION PLAN Introduction to the Draft Specific Plan April 24, 2019 RANCHO + CUCAMONGA DZ • I^ { r 1 ` I ` l I I I ra I 1 1 I ` q 3 I 1 I LUd b Why is the City conducting this process? The County sought to initiate development of this land in 2008 • County-owned land is no longer needed for flood control purposes 4 The County intends to liquidate this surplus land • Land is in County and subject to County's zoning - - County issued a Developer RFP in 2008, with the intention of changing the zoning to enable the - proposed development �- We want to have a say in how the land is developed We do not want to suffer the impacts of development without ability to mitigate • Want any development to meet the City's high L standards -- - - RANCHO CUCAMONGA County Has Development Rights Under Etiwanda North Specific Plan and Zoning; Development capacity under existing City zoning: FC og ■ FC (VLE) area = 85 acres x 1 = 85 DU (ENSP) (- °C - • FC (VL) area = 85 acres x 2 = 170 DU (ENSP) i FC "C IM cv�z os • FC (L) area = 86 acres x 4 = 344 DU (ENSP) _ — ■ LM area = 28 acres x 8 = 224 DU (Zoning) t% vac.o•m ■ Total capacity 823 DU 2.9 DU/acre) Fc E s P tY = ( ) (v�) � O A (RC) Challenges with this plan: �`� FC • Ability to protect and maintain open space Fo i son Ave :(RC) • ;; Ability to construct Wilson Ave. would fall on existing -(�r- RC UCI residents % ®, Banyan St -� v ■ Ability to acquire, construct, maintain new regional , _. park ■ Local serving retail was never built, exacerbating traffic z, Y U - T M RANCHO CUCAMONGA ----------- .-" ibs os 1992 ENSP Land Use Plan HR RE `•� .r. — - {,-nom° .: VLE VL !�• N+[ Kms'+-� -. y � _-- 11 VL Utility Corridor L: Low Res 2-4 DUA L �ru C T _ f. M,..= . • Open S•. FC: F God Control VLE: Very Low Estate• � arya t � � _ ''fir �7A ' �• • • DU/bId. ac RC: Resource Conservation HRE: Hillside Estate Res =<1 DU/bld. ac IN: Institutional NC: Neighborhood Commercial 0 War NC — 4 n • • Rancho Cucamonga General Plan What does it say about this area? • Land use designations include r' conservation, open space, hillside �� ------ residential, and flood control/utility corridor • Includes several major view corridors • Primary vehicle and non-motorized � , °� - "N, connections from Wilson Ave., Banyan - - Ave., Milliken Ave., and Day Creek Blvd. Y • Entire area within Equestrian/Rural Area Overlay with regional and community ' q trails i General Plan also gives direction on creating --� L JAL high quality neighborhoods and districts "'I ` _.. .. ,...e..�» ° _. "'"" RANCHO CUCAMONGA How did we get here? 2008 2015 2017 2018 ----- 2019 ---- 2006 019 ----2006 Spring Oct-Nov Mar-Apr Oct 2018.May 2019 Cduny lnaWtes effort to NM a aewloMnenr CKY WW t_Wnty#gree t•wt etre CRY Lily hosts fp4,cDmmunty meHufgtc "W to""""y wu Whops erb unAne uenn,o Lulu =..G to conduct puc pattllM for Mede cicprtk»:of 1.212 Goes of "taAc Ow cad In pWming:h.s -K.erelnpir.onmtwdew ; 11(yf to 11 M2 commuNty fpr.a, �+:n,�(duinr:_.•i SIplu5 WW:foim ftod co t1rol Wnd) area.Cay buns a two year cuuderalvau far the Xl fM fW commupty priomes forme ame,nw pnt,imfo Vudy(±tiSfln$ W" 2008 co,,A q andogq for VAnter May 16 June-Jury in cl a, ,M+th SS Ca my"eHardeyj am tmnq fix u,,nrc Mafee land Cny Coun4 prowdts d,w m!e oaf to city( nc.I pro tdes deeRbn to mat Pubic reanip en Finial f+rxs+C'e armmaLin In ims nwrtapern area rtMSlt ,001 pianneg and detop fJr"O Midi a communRybafed Faan lo. SpK&A e'an 8 Ela co+repf W m*a,"M r.Sponsem anro+a+:x Com nay kV.1 2009 July July•Sept No"Sal delayeddue m%oW f1Ke5s:Dfr plan monied 4dwenda mek5w .f Coulaapprmesa.a.sloe. fnuatnt In KOnIX!IK:rryfMl M fmw Ne,rbddmd B ftn.e a:bn PWC to anne4111nr11fore qt, n4lM the 0,3,5&MM Jury•Sept orfup exms 5[awr4fcUer mfn!ngs and drMme SLrw:y 'o hettw rtll vmd c:Arvnt my pcelefel rM npthborfn and ff"n,& Martial Sept 21 opoo Nduse to snare cn,v ptual plan eiMn Ii 50pRnd by'M Cnmmsnity Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Engagement Community Workshops (2017) Fall of 2017, four public workshops were held on the previous concept: • Opportunity to share the Plan Area analysis and initial planning concepts • It became clear during those workshops that the community wanted to take a more active role in defining the planning concepts for the Area • January 2018 City staff began reaching out to the community to start a fresh conversation about the alternatives for the Area's future Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO Public Engagement Re-engagement (January through April of 2018) At the direction of the City Council, staff shelved the previous plan and returned to the community to better understand what the community's vision for the land might be A series of workshops, small group meetings, and online surveys were utilized to identify community concerns and preferences Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLM RANCHO CUCAMONGA City Council Objectives Fiscally Financially neutral (or feasible positive) Community- (And finish based Wilson Ave. RANCHO CUCAMONGA T� New � ' connection) Proposal What are our options? Do Nothing Annex, Keep as Open Space Annex with Community-based Plan Community creates plan for responsible Outcome County develops land Community raises $, land stays open development before County finds a space development partner High: our options for mitigating None to low: little would change, Low to moderate: most impacts would Potential Community Impacts impacts are reduced without land fire hazards and circulation issues be offset by mitigation requirements use control would remain High: we will have to pay for High: we will have to tax ourselves Neutral to slightly positive: the right mix Potential Fiscal Impacts services for new neighbors or otherwise raise $XX Million to of land uses will be fiscally neutral to without receiving tax revenue pay for and maintain land slightly positive Quality&Amenities Unknown Depends on how much money is High: Our city has some of the highest raised quality development in So Cal RANCHO CUCAMONGA ' support - • . • • • - • • . . • • • - • • - 84.1% • loca I control 1.6% - Support buying and conserving the Lower Area for$129 million, paid for by an additional annual tax of$260 per parcel. support 10.7%- Support buying and conserving the Upper Area for $42 million, -)90/0 9% (a new annual tax of$95 per parcel). local control 21.4%- Support buying and conserving both the Lower and Upper Areas for $171 million, (a new annual tax of$355 per parcel). D4O/osupport � o IO CC O�l i f 01 51.2/e- Don't buy either one - I don't support a new tax for these purchases. support some level of 15.0% - Not sure. �5B'9�0 neighborhood development under City standards RANCHO LN CUCAMONGA NORTH EASTERN SPHERE ANNEXATION PROPOSAL (NESAP) Public Engagement POP-UP WORKSHOP SCHEDULE DATt _. nAU - _ AmVETYI1Vwr_- tO ilm COMMUNITY . • �...re t•..1r•• NepA•�rV OyYL Mr• Ce,..MIWA ws _ s.�.r�.r►.�.. mopyu.Y.Y.r<�.r� tr.tr1 tLM•Cre•prOvA.I crMl6.rysirr�Cr 01 -CatrEmunity'llleeliiu�e �—•+ ex...esof. w-arYrsrure..r C+f1ME6eMra t...Cr OE .yn•• twasF tt70ylf.te.t11.►.MCwwwM qu•7r. rw0•re..s.�,rst.Ar vsr.rO.,sr. &April 19,2018 arra tsrr.t Y,rf�rE� �,a.�r e•..tra Mrrs.r..rtY*r twN,�Ywtae ArA/ a.oet.�.Fr..4A•Cv� Wbar I,NESAVt - iM•aM Y•sq••q•r �tf..yttM•nY nr.Nanir Ea„e..r sphe2Hr...mbn naparar a.NEsnParA glO6G�dC.�r0.e.�•Cw.,ar .md.t,>nNme��.a,,...d.e,ymn,.,en;namdPrr.;� EE.rre+ws.twnrsr. FE.rti+rb+s Farmw.and han rare nartt.h Cary limmro rFe NanarorFwes �e•r• e/�1�t1.a.etat.a�rCveM bwrMary_ Pre NEW artn<mwnr a rami d oP,.-.., ,M , N., ~ Q+.�+' u r•er.e•Fi.4N K,n«area�A made Aye ee.aa.nmr of o sPxlrr ���. �^ )I wf w.wA+.Y.rt.•�w�. GeneN Pkn Mnnrdmmt 2annq Mop AmeMmere Eer.oMa ` A1AYrEAyy �.aet�y�w•Y NmM1 spRJ qan n.new�v.and ell,aid m.,,mmanra � /a � •� tiS0lC�rdO 0.t1,Ar4a�.re• Ininal dap.. �anvdemnarra ma.mar x ! - � _ _ ro.ir..iram���h3toos a•_mranmian w�mer F r ;"� t. � _— Mi/11LM1 +VMNOtir a and apwa•a dY E]00 erre,ai M -d..elaP^Kmwm- 71MAW�IA.,iL�G..rr,ve �'in Are mAedr Poreon 9amnollr tocard trreen �tlAet OwYe Y..Ma Q.�t�de Wrrr/W.rEr.+7pr.�+EF.• M.nue eeu Wr C.ed Bwlem.4 rurf.d 9:yan Seer _�,a YDE telrrer n-.tLAr t1�,M f10rs C .. vAwk%wet 6MM16eY•a1rrC�►Dl - car ncmam �� sosoo c,r.t Mane you seen rhe Fareboot LIVE ddr..rn�on rzaff tined,ha,inp •Mugs we're heard"-pa ro aur Ciry F«•hwt lope ro war Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanRANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Engagement Nims .- w w P ■ tib' i�'"�`� � '!` ,t• �.�. 7• ;� • °iIR �+ i �• � a s=. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLN RANCHO CUCAMONGA Spring 2018 Community Input The clearest outcomes of this process were: 1. the community favored taking local control of the Plan Area, and 2. there was very little support for new taxes to pay for open space conservation 3. Some neighborhood development in the lower Plan Area would be needed to gain local control and would be an acceptable means Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 2018 UPDATE On May 16th , the City Council directed Staff to continue working with the community on a plan for neighborhoods and conservation in the northeastern area of the City. • OPTION 3 Annex the 1,200 acres owned by the County and the 3, 100 acres in the foothills and use local control to ensure high quality neighborhood development to cover the cost of habitat conservation. LOCAL CONTROL AVOID NEW TAXES Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLX RANCHO CUCAMONGA In the Summer of 2018, City hosted a community-based planning process to learn more about priorities and how to best balance them . y'. P • Pop-up outreach • Small group meetings • Online survey • Promoted by email, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, and Nextdoor. • Website with videos and information to explain the planning process. RANCHO CUCAMONGA w. ETIWANDA HEIGHTS hi When I step out iha front door of my - NEIGHBORHOOD 4 CONSERVATION PIAN . new home I would want to find: f • – � - -- ewe. • e b iw»� • .�,w�w wn...m..Mv�..u.a..�un.re.y�.+,.w.�..u�a.�..�v rv+v�w.> _ - _:�t•p��w a• Q—. _ � In lOyemc le111 ee�-v�^,:mnann l,.wmu�emlL�mu,Msneorrooe wn.relaan �� © E rE� }10.i� tri}� t# CAfc �►Ek 4e Please make your selection... 1. No,I dislike it very much Z. Ok,I Can live with R 3. I'm neutral 4. GoodI like it .. 5. Great,, [love it Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA As a result of previous workshops, pop-ups, and Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood & Conservation Plan p Progress am small group meetings, the - . �_ SlmRancho Cucamonga Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan - Please take this 5-10 minute survey to help the City of Rancho Cucamonga prepare - community better - Ihe Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan. � articulated their priorities. r The City used this input to prepare the online survey, which is still open today. TheBer a 1200 acres is surplus land owned by the County of Senn Bernardino Flood Control and the County plans to sell. By annexing the Plan Area,community members like you can 3 help the City plan the future of this area. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLW RANCHO CUCAMONGA Survey results ranked # 1 Priority: Plant and Animal Habitat priorities: #2 Priority: Minimize Wildfire Risk #3 Priority: Range of Housing #4 Priority: Semi-Rural Character #5 Priority: Minimize Traffic Impacts #6 Priority: Pathways for walking/biking/horses #7 Priority: Gathering Spaces and Parks #8 Priority: Beautiful, well maintained neighborhoods Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO PublicEngagement © duty of Rancho Cucamonga-city GovernmentPooxsneu Gy Jennifer Cama<hPCw4: , SeplemLyv 8.2018 0 The CM wUuld love to near from voul Input 1s needed on what types of hOusifgactivities and amenrDes could be elements of future neighborhoods within the Etrwanoa Heghts Neighborhood&Conservation ® City of Rancho Cucamonga - City Government Plan area The proposed annexation area is over six miles long with less 10 - August 14,2018 than one mile identified as proposed n iighborfoods to support me cost to conserve as much open space as posMtle You may have heard the North Eastern Sphere Annexation Proposal is We invite you to provide feedback wa this survey opponunny moving Into the next phase. After a series of meetings and online stip iron lv:EhwandaHei see More engagements to determine how the community would went to proceed with NESAP.the majority of participants supported local control with some sort taw°"w"no"ri of neighborhood plan as a way to achieve local control and annexation Nf1GN°O1MO°'°aw.Irly°"OF no The next phase of NESAP will be to worK with the entire Rancho PLANNINO OtOIT DOES NOT P20POS Cucamonga community to create the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood ,,,_o,,,_,_ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,•._,,,,,,y See More '•" "'�""` `""' rrbTY •IW..��M�e t 1 I '" \YL 1_ `i Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLW RANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Engagement ® City of Rancho Cucamonga-City Government ••• City of Rancho Cucamonga-City Government ••• Published by Gatrble Costello ,. February 22-O Published by Jennifer Camacho-Curtis hi September 17,2015 O Looking for a quick summary of the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood& Join us on Friday, September 21st for an opportunity to explore the plan.. Conservation Plan?Check out this video to help summarize how the drop by to see where we are in the process and what are the next steps. process started and what's next.The City of Rancho Cucamonga is Visit http.1/www.CityofRC.uVEtiwandaHeights to learn more and to currently in the Environmental Impact Report phase,which is expected to participate In the online survey xYourFutureRC#EtiwandaHeiahtsPlan be completed this spring.We thank everyone who has contributed to this community effort thus far For more information about the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood&Conservation Plan.visit COMMUNITY OPEN HOUSE www CitvofRC us/EtiwandaHeights. EXPLORING THE COMMUNITY-BASED PIAN • I • ;I• III FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 21. 2018 t t DROP-IN ANYTIME BETWEEN d PM - 8 PM Victoria Gardens Cultural Center - Courtyard 52505 Cultural Center Way , - , . - , a as a , • — " - Open House- Exploring the Etiwanda Heights Plan Interested V -i like City of Rancho Cucamonga-City Govern. RA Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan MOHO The online survey and the Open House helped to answer a key • • What types of uses belong in the annexation area to : 1 . achieve local control, 2 . avoid increasing our tax burden, and 3 . balaCUCAMONGA nce our eight priorities? - , RANCHO Open House WON 91On September 21, 2018, the City hosted an open house to share concepts and gather input on the new initial concept. • 200 people attended • Five stations with subject 94 matter experts - r Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA The Result : the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan I Rural/Conservation Area i 3,565 acres Vision: Large quantities of conserved rural i i and natural open space in the northern i i ! portion of the Plan Area, underwritten by ` ! and in balance with high quality H!, I I Neighborhood Area 828acres .._ neighborhood development in the ,, �� j © i _ southerly areas already surround by existing neighborhoods. V L. db Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Guiding Principles P • M Local Control u Open Space Conservation Local Control Open space 1 2 Conservation Active Healthy Living Ab Fiscal Responsibility - Public Safety ELM, Active Healthy Fiscal Unique Sense of Place 3 Living 4 Responsibility 5 Public safety Unique sense of Place Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Guiding Principles Local Control ■ Prepare a community-based Plan that balances conservation of foothill natural habitats and rural open space with limited neighborhood development. • Annex the Plan Area to the City of Rancho Cucamonga to ensure that conservation and neighborhoods meet Rancho Cucamonga's high standards for planning, design and maintenance. Open Space Conservation • Permanently conserve the maximum feasible amount of rural open space and natural habitat. • Balance conservation objectives with recreational and educational access, financial feasibility, and respect for property rights. • Adopt clear rural development standards and design guidelines to ensure that limited low intensity residential development is compatible with the surrounding rural and natural environment. • Designate and fund a well-qualified conservation management entity to acquire, conserve, restore and manage habitat and open space resources. /� Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO W CUCAMONGA Guiding Principles Active Healthy Living ■ Extend pedestrian, bicycle and equestrian trail networks to connect existing and new neighborhoods to one another and to the foothill open spaces above. ■ Provide a range of housing opportunities for families of many ages, sizes and lifestyles. • Locate a variety of sizes and types of neighborhood parks, greens, playgrounds and playfields throughout the neighborhoods, and within a safe, pleasant walk of every home. • Organize neighborhoods around a network of complete streets that provide safe, comfortable walking and biking routes beautiful community gathering spaces. • Locate small neighborhood-serving shops and restaurants for convenient access by car or bike, or on foot or horseback. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan (4"6RANCHO CUCAMONGA Guiding Principles Fiscal Responsibility • Ensure that conservation and neighborhood development pay their own way and do not place new tax burdens on existing residents. • Enable enough neighborhood development in the lower portions of the Plan Area to generate funds for the acquisition, conservation, restoration and management of the conservation lands above. • Provide enough shops and restaurants to generate sales tax to offset the cost of services for the housing. Public Safety • Ensure that new and existing neighborhoods are protected from flood, wildfire and geological hazards. • Connect Wilson and Rochester Avenues through the plan area to complete the Foothill Neighborhoods circulation framework and improve access. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLX RANCHO CUCAMONGA Guiding Principles Unique Sense of Place • Plan and design new neighborhoods to emphasize views of the mountains above and the valley below. ■ Ensure that new neighborhood edges are compatible with existing adjacent neighborhoods and respect existing viewsheds. • Provide high quality design standards to ensure that the buildings and landscapes of Etiwanda Heights reflect the unique heritage of Etiwanda and Alta Loma. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan LN RANCHO CUCAMONGA A Plan For Conservation and Neighborhoods �.nh Euwa�ee vre lNe i �� � f Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLW RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation Strategy • Conserve and restore habitat and ecosystem functions ■ Mitigation : Provide developer incentives to underwrite conservation as mitigation for the neighborhood ■ TDR: Provide incentives for property owners in the RCA to transfer development rights to the neighborhood, expanding open space • New rural development standards to build on the City's hillside regulations and limit the footprint of new development • Active management to ensure permanent, adequately funded management of conservation lands • Managed recreation and education access to the RCA Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation PlanLW RANCHO CUCAMONGA Regulating Plan 9 9 I I I I l_------ Ho Key for Figure S.9.1 B-Sub-Zones _i M Hillside (R-H) i 12 i e_____s r Conservation IR{) _-____- I I Open Space Rt-OS) — —�Flood Control/Utility Corridor (R-FC/UC) 10 ' 1 3/, /t 11 .9 I i I_ L.— ` 17 6 Neighborhood Estates (NE) %� 'fir/ I-------- Neighborhood General l (NG-1) -. JJ Neighborhood General 2 (NG-2) I �, 8 ShopsBRestaurants (SR) I1 I Central Greenway Overlay (CG-0) .� School site Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCoHO Existing Conserved Lands r.._.._.._.._. .._.._..- -.._. i 11 13 r I -------------- I N. 4-10 1 Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) _ __ Neighborhood Area (NA) Yr 3 bz yar S �,�.J _ ?a•rn ct — Fare,r Conserved and Managed I Conserved not Managed I it Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommended Preserves 13 1 ........... r .—. ._..--'�.._.._..—. -. I 4-10 I: HI ve M11 = Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) ! i I 4 Neighborhood Area (NA) wrw,sw ! it MWAm L._ Conserved and Managed ! Conserved not Managed X - I! o = - Ilinym?t —.� //r/ Recommended Preserves �� �l A Etiwanda Heights Preserve B Deer Canyon Preserve ;1 L..p C Clark Preserve db Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation Priorities ki-S I I I "A;' F------------I-------?I I i 10 I Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) i Neighborhood Area (NA) Conserved and Managed Conserved not Managed X Recommended Preserves (I� {—"—'•T i� Etiwanda Heights Preserve B Deer Canyon Preserve II - J L C Clark Preserve Occupied Private Parcel - - - - - - RANCHO CUCAMONGA Transfer Of Development Rights t 1 i I I 1 Key for Figure S.9.1 B-Sub-Zones � �-------' 13 Hillside (R-H) Con"mrstion (R{) i ,_____, 12 I � Open Space (R-OSI Flood ControMillty Corridor (R-K/UC))))))) — — •— —' t 10 Neighborhood Estates (NE) .'1'— 2 -=. Neighborhood General t (NG-1) �µ 2 Neighborhood General 2 (NG-2) Shops B Restaurants (SR) Central Greenway Overlay (CG-O) ,J School Site RANCHO CUCAMONGA Minimizing Impacts in R/CA 5.9.2 Rural/Conservation Area Building Standards How they are minimized by the Plan . ' �,. O O X1. ry N p nal Y.e-F mhe�rtv. QAr .yNna ' Q nunr uu.i.r. O z�NE <mm�.r l!]I .rr rnrl 238 15.1? ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD&CONSERVATION PLAN Open Space Framework - - 13 N uh fuw,,d `reserv= 11 12 I (I db o 3 � i i1 it Ltd RANCHO LW CUCAMONGA Master Plan of Trails Figure 6.1.46 Master Plan of Trails t 13 I \ i j1korth Etiwanda 7meN, \ t 12 ` 1 Iii ,� j 1110 i 1 , 11 0 — �8 I RANCHO LmCUCAMONGA Range of Trail Types to .._ �;AF';_ a. a. kRANCHO cUCAt. ONGA Neighborhoods Strategy • Create an expansive open space network to provide access to and views of the conserved foothill open spaces as well as formal parks and trails • Healthy, active living through walkable neighborhoods, trails, and streets • Extensive roadway network to reduce bottlenecks and traffic and provide great public safety access • A range of housing types from large equestrian estates to smaller starter homes • Strong design standards and guidance, including minimizing mass grading, to deliver on desires for "tree-lined streets" and "semi-rural character," and to maximize stormwater retention • Small scale neighborhood serving commercial to expand neighborhood services and amenities RANCHO LM CUCAMONGA �ti----- ---�� ------------------J----- Open Space Framework 1 Alm" 4 1 , t 1 1 C 1 1 / _ Figure 6.1.28 Regulating Plan-Street Network Street Network W*W Arc' _ AR Primary Arterial Street' Neighborhood Avenue 1 - Modified Primary Arterial Street' — Neighborhood Avenue 2 I / ' Secondary Arterial Street Wilson Avenue/MainStreet to T Collector Street Neighborhood Streets — EntryAvenue _ Neighborhood Edge Drive % ;' '•I Bw1nN �....�.. - SI. I RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIG.5.7A:THOROUGHFARE REGULATING PLAN Multimodal Network I j • Driving Banyan Street Retrofit i E = i Neighborhood Avenue 1 j • Walking Neighborhood Avenue 2 I _... • Hiking Entry Avenue Milliken Avenue ` - • Biking I - � Wilson Main Street , • Horse-♦Jack Riding Neighborhood Street t I I Neighborhood Street 2 (Estates) -- Rear Line WIIun Ave• H'llson e Edge Drive I , • ••• Paseo f "� Edge Lane / Hj,h 5aM 4 Banyan k ve Street Features • 10-11 Foot Travel Lanes • Roundabouts $ -- • Chokers I e • Bike Lanes -1 1 Milo ' • On-street Parking • Multipurpose Trails • Parkways/Bioswales RANCHO CUCAMONGA Banyan FIG. 5.7.5: BANYAN RETROFIT gf ILI n F E D G B C D G Public Frontage Public Frontage A • • 1CUCAMONGA FIG. 5.7.6A: MILLIKEN AVENUE ENTRY F G E D C B C D E G F Public Frontage Publi<Frontage A • FIG. 5.7.7A: ENTRY AVENUE (ROCHESTER AVE} Rochester Ave ./Wilson Entries •r G mm E D C D E F H Public Frontage Public Frontage A • • Wilson/ Rochester Typical FIG. 5.7.8A: NEIGHBORHOOD AVENUE 1 1 — �e r F E Public Frontage Public Frontage A ZC • 1 FIG. 5.7.9A: NEIGHBORHOOD AVENUE 2 v - _� E F D C B C D F E Public Frontage Public Frontage A • • FIG. 5.7.10A: MAIN STREET - TYPICAL (WILSON AVENUE) , - Int D E D B '''• C E D Public Frontage Public Frontage A " • Wilson " Main Street"" , : SQUARE) 44* MAI 11 r ,# Publi(Frontage zz��,X RANCHO o .i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Edge Drives FIG 1 TYPICAL EDGE DRIVE 1 IL O © I (4"6 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Neighborhood Streets FIG. 5.7.11A: NEIGHBORHOOD STREET 1 Public Frontage Public Frontage A - • • Neighborhood Streets FIG 1 STREET 2 NEIGHBORHOOD i 1 1"m /' RANCHO Lm CUCAMONGA I i 1 Neighborhood ------ - - - - - - - - - -- Concept Haven J f _� f View :� { © j' 1 Estates �:?��� 1 - --- - - - -- -1! OMilliken Heights Neighborhoods:Very large hoose_ I 'r _ O, i v -- - - - ! _ - _ _ _r �•` on large mini-rural lots with expansme views of the I ~ mountains and volleys and easy access to the City's Deer e.tenwe trail network; I '• - Creek I © Central Neighborhoods:Large,medium and smaller homes within a S-minute walk of(he Central Greenway .7t parks and bails and a 5-mmute walk of Wilson Square; NWkMe:• - - - - I © - - 4 © Hanson Ierroce:Large,medium and smaller homes � r'• I within o S.70 minute walk of Wilson Square and the Central Greenway. ' Wilson Square 0 South Neighborhoods:Large,medium and smaller — - (2-acre park) hones within a 3 minute walk of the Central Greenway parks and trails,and a short walk or bike from Wilson Square. / -r I cr o.o. I 0�• © West Neighborhoods:large and medium homes alongCentral the west edge of Etmonda Heights,connected by the West Edge Linear Park _..�r 'i"'-�' }MSt +y` --� Greenway OBanyan Community PloyJlelds g Neighborhood: Community Park,sports,heldz and adjacent housing fronting Rochester g Banyan.lvenues: I i1 � Caryn `z ® Foothill Freeway I�RANCHO I`iWl CUCAMONGA 'FIG.5.3SUB-AREA REGULATING PLAN Regulating "view Estates Plan/Zones ---;--;---------------- Ar F- I: � Neighborhood Estates (NE) � J Neighborhood General? (NG-1) Deer _-► I' rs r ; 7-7 Neighborhood General 2 (NG-2j Creek _ , � Shops&Restaurants (SR) Central Greenway Overlay (CG-O) -�� ir •� `� j I T Z// $hopfron[Required Wllson Ave 7 ' _ Y`, '■, Bron Ave School Site '.p�1V` �; 6 'N: NA Iw t i Banyank .Banyan St j--�----- ��• ` 1 I I 1 Caryn ' I I Iz Foothill Freeway RANCHO + CUCAMONGA Estate (in Subarea #3) Height 36 feet maximun) Minimum / 1 20 feet betwee6 R . i buildings G 25% maximum 0 NE NG-1 NG-2 ALLOWED RANCHO Lw CUCAMONGA r Extra Large House (all Subareas except #3) Height 36 feet maximum _ Its Minimum 20 feet between g 49 r, buildings Lot coverage: 30% maximum 0 NE NG 1 NG-2 �oWCo RANCHO CUCAMONGA Large House (all Subareas except #3) Height 36 feet maximum Minimum ! 111 Ally,15 feet !- between buildings O � - O Lot coverage: 0 NE NG-1 NG-2 Kev _ Primary Mass siyINN _ Property Line 1� ALOVfED 35% maximum Open Space ■ .,!RANCHO �1 CUCAMONGA Medium House (all Subareas except #3) Height 34 feet maximumRC4 T ',O IL4AIc i Minimum iE 10 feetPR between buildings0:� i _ � Or Lot coverage: 0 NE NG-1 NG-2 1 ALLOMD ALLOWED 40% maximum RANCHO some= CUCAMONGA Small House (Subareas #4-7, and 9) Height 34 feet maximum • R _ tqN f Minimum 10 feet +K between buildings Lot coverage: 0 NE NG-1 NG-2 � 50% maximum ALLOWED WI6-Lai yRANCHO C-r--� CUCAMO NGt Large Front Yard (requirements and characteristics) t 00%� ammailki"i.r. -- a 'Al ep r 6�1 .� rr Frontage element Min. Max. Landscape(%of front yard areal 50% I loth Hardsca %of front Y 1 and area - 50k� Pe( Wall height at frontage(total) - 4' . Will ■.■. 0 Elevated Yard Height - 4' IL Q Grading on Front Yard 0.5% 5% 0 Ground Floor above Grace at is, 3' v„ setback Oi rQ Q' Fath to Front Door Width 6' - �— RANCHO CUCAMONGA Small Front Yard (requirements and characteristics) - Frontage element MIN MAX Q Wall height at tentage(total) 3' ') jLLLj YYp. ! j t m Q Elevated Yard Height 3 Q Grading on Front Yard 0.5% Stili Ground Floor above Grade at ® setback 18" 3 141 r Porch depth(not nduding stairs) $ Porch width 10' _• _; O ! � Q Porch floor height- $ 12' Floor height18" 3' Between porch and front PL 5[!� Q Stoop width 4' 8' Stoop depth(not including stags) 4' 8' n Qto et�l $ © Stoop fbor height' 18" 3' ♦♦ Plan[erRence height - 3' �., ,• Q Entry Recession depth 6" E' W it ® I I [ ► o -? I . "® Q . i I �� O - RANCHO I-10 - - - �1 CUCAMONGA Attached House Types (Subareas #4-7, and 9) 1. Attached A (detached garage); 2. Attached B (attached garage); 3. Attached C ("mansion") RANCHO CUCAMONGA Other Structure Types (Subarea #6, minor parts of 7 and 9) RF.gR SNF ffYia/ Ce 7 UP 1. Attached flex (live/work units); o 2. Shops and restaurants; e e r o a 3. Carriage houses (accessory dwelling units (ADUs) SURFACEPARKING FORCARRIA6EHGEMOUSf Q RANCHO ImCUCAMONGA Shops & Restaurants (subarea #6, minor parts of 7 and 9) 5.4.13 Shops&Restaurants `j A. Ske Drganitatbm/Mm aing _ t. [brprbM of a prMaary Nan Gree.«<y q - 't4EtiARE�Nf SssI inn+p <eWrwWn bee urpfn 2 A<mMuais Rn'ef alnq<mn my rpt eeaetl 1. of al l«za P. tR sneeawal ' 311WW bl Ow Sp,,6T P«par R6aWi14 ` - � l5eeib<k Ow Spa<eTYp«xOrapfaSB1 3. Butr16afNtwnP<arms+rcsNF+PM11nRap Bau bM Sltle 4 6NWrp a.ay bem ron Wn2afores.4ar+eYe< 8 B ZSatatba naY ba cmTsbnab+PPn+tl by N! �`_ ® J /� Rf«8l Neg4trrinM DbnPnc«s. J e. open space a % 1. Ne WenaW<arlWreLL (cmvaRPfawzrrvry/mrmxru<omwmr<rt<envwN RfFT Q_` C. A¢ns w,wwss 1. R«a NrRy o1$ipprvnl f .v Typo sae r @rgkrSSS 'tea 3. Al ema0 pants/a�tl IWeY6 ipr.Y iPaB tr ® .. i.� 4e.1 ,� -. kU[BO at 44P MrClille Kt. ..u.�. - /. Seef-0ppWSf26ane 46kSNler%Mgantl ® -.: .aae VMbIbrA«ers yarMNz a .� m wC+wuPn Yuv Y/Am MNar/rtl� enM/ne maM1 Warraa zu - COW[Sa>ac{mma¢nm amuvrywamnvmn'. uswY Mn was - wm�w.YN..+kp rr«yrryoa.ppe O re• YpY buprapaYbtln< Yrotl+YepW6alrr api ]wAbM1 r aa��a .eg' �km4 s uYaw vAyviM �cgaus i FgparsaP rpr.F.�Mra moa tr®au $Myfrrmi VeWOertbuge veOabWle[IrYOM 6a9 'r°t« nOeem tMWbxsnm an pepiA'a<uuoxp cY 'p 1f NatgpPltagY 1 ReWva RaFr l+nP RANCHO 1b I6G15191 fTIWANCq HEIGHTS NE1GrEGRNCCC Q[04SE0.VgT1CN PLAN tf] CUCAMONGA Outcomes of this Specific Plan ■ Extensive conservation of the front country • A new, unique, healthy, outdoor lifestyle available to Rancho residents • Every home within comfortable 5-minute walk of park and/or trail ■ Every sub-area has unique identity and mix of housing types ■ Significant percentage of car trips and discretionary spending captured 1 ® r RANCHO CUCAMONGA Questions and Discussion RANCHO CUCAMONGA Master Planning Process RANCHO CUCAMONGA How it works ' • Required through streets • Meet street types standards : i j ■ �yY' ■ Required open spaces } i 1 • Meet block size standards I ■ Provide rear lanes if any lots < 60' wide ♦' r � 1 ■ Select housing types based on zone •� •;-r __ _ ' table -TkBLEBUILDING TYPES DSOS ReguUung longe khool , ` K! 00 Bu11dM[TYVe • CluKor omw+mirarmw. .0 Gercrau{nwaa xnwtwn.eu a � Fz¢oe Hauu SA.3 _ • __ Ertre Lary Meuse $A.4 • • � •�•� M Moet SAS •_ an St -:a T` { r31GiT ��.: y �iiw... Medum Mouse Sa6 • • �/_ � Ba Smell Nouie Sal$ • y�`�•`w�w`+"� reomep♦ Sag • • r-e. y: M¢tl s Sato _ — ___.. _• nm, C salt _ • ------- • — �a: %•� `7 ntmcifM R. Sa13 • • _ vj 'w SFepLNeNeunn¢ Sa13 • How it works YI�� S' .l'-14 k-I&I W-Ul. . r .,.. �/a�. fh _. apnairra rvn _ __ _ _ Ifs/` `` r ' P>• $fibObr! Bl.. YL L M 5 Pl, ib q-C q�Fk„ SIIJ �� ' 41 fl K SYrr/Yp Ip' b IP 1 rp -wl 15f LY ,DY .4P ,AWP r,M r'm � - �` V�l�• I 0..Y s.51an61uwMalr+WOwMI M.d..w.: y ! wv. DSOS MnerY Wwvbflr Im ^ A ichool ,� I an St Ba nM b H Fpe, mun I v..reruul ' ..umnevW.r Isrl n. ns uv ap I How it works _ 5.3.4 Sub-areas The Nelighborhoad Area Is dMded Into 9 suth ^/ areas. Eads sub-area has been assigned a NEIGHBORHOOD AREA SUB-AREA REQUIREMENTSly requlred allotment of Public Open Space, suMama Subsea Bwtding Types.ars regulatmg zones as shaven 1 2 - _3 - -- 4 ---5 - 6 7 8 - -- --9 Tatai In Table S3. -- - - — A Poetic Open Spam.The required acreage of qualifying Public Open Space for die Plan Gross Ara Acres 33 s0 155 117 90 87 46 49 201 m Area exceeds the minimum recused by the Sue antl by the Gtyeisewmere.ThI true Net Bbd,Area Shown Acres 20.1 21.1 61 47.4 "A 441 30.5 2A 107.9 385 per ,sutrarea and In total.See Table58 for Publk Open SpaI Acro 225 3.50 8.60 930 7.50 8.5 4.50 30.0 11.0 85.15 detalls mnceming required acreages,and Gapter 5.8 for standards per type. S. Building Types.A minimum and maximum Estate (5.4.3) DUs 100 130 I number ofeach Bulldm,,Typelsailowed per XL 15.4.4) DUa 0 60 30 100 0 60 0 60 9 40 0 40 b r40 0 14 40 120 sub-area.and each subarea has a limited L (5.4.5) DUs 50 100 30 100 0 60 60 120 60 100 30 60 20 60 10 /5 100 150 number of allowed dwelling.The number a allowed df elfth s may only increase M (5.4.6) DUs 0 1W a 50W 120 60 100 40 80 40 80 0 6 80 140 through the transfer of il..lopmem rights S (5.47-8j Bus 0 1 100 60 100 80 120 50 90 Ali 80 60 120 (NR)process as oallnetl in napter 7. AmchedA (5.4.9) BUS 0 120 0 120 30 90 30 90 60 120 C. 8egukting Zones. Regulating zones are t_ _ - intended to be applied to each block as Attached B (5.4.70) Due 0 90 0 90 40 IN 0 90 60 120 showmn the Regulating Pian(Flgare5.2.28). Attached (5.4.11) 0l% 0 30 0 30 0 20 0 30 0 I 10 However.the Regulating Zones my adjust - - - wiNinthe parametersofTable 5.3. Attached Flex (5.4.12) DUs 0 60 0 60 0 so 0 60 60 120 Total Dwellings Bus ttl 1>J 154 567 478 A59 281 15 702 ;900 SR (5.4.13) SF - - - 12MIMK O NE Acres $17 Ba '�-NGT- - Acm ictal NBA not NBA il3 dO.J > Total NBA fP_.5 374 r5R`' Acres FIG.5.3SUB-AREA REGULATING PLAN Regulating Plan/Zones ______ -------------------- nune�nx ara Eaxe[e %L L M $ Mp k9 4C M{1N SR 4 w l i 3s 1 r >rrrY...www ro +a 1 v- 1 n m awvuwle w.1.��•.1• _ I .;r� } � v� h / 1 1 Wilson Ave�y�',--� 5 s e1 t �f I �+,- uw x x x• u u u u u u ,; `,I�_1}. .x. ++xy� ciN1M9x:Lxv1 ID! W" 3@ N V M N 'N 'A •t I1 / y i •••s ayh +1� �� I ws..raw +R 1v .v w • 1v +r w a +R /� � .I � F �4� � I w�•n+.e.++naw n u ro +r o m m /> II � �%ss I �..ra..�,+R+wx n+ wv, m .oR sw+ su asa sm � 1 lo,ln s•.n��.i I 1 � eft I I Banyan StL. 'y i;Yaa a: g`4CIY? 1 aanYan St nm.lvx wu1n yv :N M x4 )9 + a a s sm.nvax RANCHO CUCAMONGA Development Standards RANCHO CUCAMONGA Estate 5.45 Estate SkeprgantrnRbn/MmrNg I. wart Swanmry euldlgs anA asy _ R a ld.rba.��5%rAP}YrtRz6,ltl rmYzIP�o. E6R(qN/E 1. Ullry n NmNE EaleaaM narw+Ynr erprawge ween e,ll aM PYutl unNMmPpb '� I. Rwryenl aaw4r.WVeAbreuYerlMpE[aininy mRp6a Zs%.t bbm mnvun C. Aecerr I. TM1eyNary emmarcesM1SOtr bwbESWlrcm. L;'_ 1 , 2. vMamwIrf lelw2m^aytrwa rM pr ar411.Frem mrave 1 C-YneraWrm en4 brpmpartiPa..Mnlla CFninl Grtmvny _ 3. MnmNero am Pw'meA kun4 Rena Zea<+wrpOa'.�a< I - a. CYVUrp(.rmaRPNn{mp O`� / O S. yMwM1Y maiia�l4+rC WYSIDkF WM,f>np r p. Y+'IrYln[enmlGreemm�y OveMy[C4pJ STREET `O:i � 1. II kml AW el qe kwpAn M tle pmary 0 .L mFl Ma: ® Ney � r' yu:a avununsllaNee3imms. .+'Y'^ 2 Mw Emmrlm GvalGwwwary Rwr Yrtl rtWYe6 wn. romnpOa.aa�aam w.Y>Yrmmrv,m..r nY.ar. ^mY ORm>TYSfMpOP%Clq.�aaA<aa w,mrgc . Immry lab�e Y.m.Ya+a _ Y1daiA�tOPemly3Syrme fmrdPa^v...... tlgma.e wY9 WIyO mttllmM ar m YYmaY rwuPo x;+opA.N m 'ry wrYYAwr 'v°MuwYl ..retry y uTrtluva pp+tan Paw.un YPVun .e.>.T.Y m e.r.Y.� K" RANCHO r awpmmNan ams.mewrrcortn,.r,:.:: mP+m�tl+aman/«w 136 164 ISI?I ErIWANDAHFIGHISN(IGH60RN0066(O�%FFUAr:(INPI1N CT OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I PUBWK"IEWDRAF 1w-1a1Ci "'' *12ANCH0 CUCAMONGA Extra Large House 0. I W.I..tatbn/NMENg are S,canWry eulDflp ,ntl bo �a�• -"'� I ` i-- / � � _ �_- 2 NWry<M,mlun�WOe.bnlw n.rusl0n .� I n�j■! warcl.n....••.n,mpweYml(e�oYm Open Sp%ce 1 R,lrpNlrwhrtpulPtlbrputleprWktlnM{ / �s / / _ InOPM1Y35%olbbm nMb*un. ' C. Atrnl /f 1. iM1eMhlNMv+rcnn,Erobrmtlnlrowm + p ! / 2 VMabf NnnM1LTI•lbbW.Mfhro � �/.Y Ct _.�l ar OrHwY Iron IM1e sVHt Rllr Ynr rlyYeG Y ma NrPSMMn�wOnIro CMNI GnwMey _ _ / t. CYLtlsfp'YplflpN++Y1M - - - ��� � / � 5 Sn[bgI,.S426meTlbitO b.P.rore.nv _ VrM1tCb U las R.np,M J J-J O. I A, Cl M%.1Iel119nr EItle 1 ICFOI 1 Al b!n M%!I Ib faelPnn et Iro Pm,ry ..va.. 1 NYfilnn ante Cmvl14reemiy. �M mAr1 w�gnal Wa�Y lY,1 lliw.1Y5� '�• y �� MIKUPTYY'oeNaAnq�Nzay av0/antPpKn M+ )IUR�(>)l O/nM hpw Y�SNfM (w 4ntla1WY V6+�A OI�V%l Cf N6 mmaud.+muea bn.(wwy q pMa '+Vn a0 vTw gvtU pyrit! I[gA+atp panlw•non KNotApp Nsde wwsesmsajlaEfmpwet fvn av nyx¢c xnno rn grnoymas RANCHO IM IW.15191 ETIWANOAHEIGHISNEIGHGORHOOD&CONtRVATONPLN tap WCUCAMONGA Large House 45 _,r,PHoise A. SRe OrglmlzatlOn I M.SMS - 1_Q I Wytlh{icflen K{Oop✓SOM ., _ �/� 2. UnfirywnrxtgR zheWtlMbwtN nares b ,./ 1 6/': ::. Cr ErJYYP N{NMiItl PU[MY YMMrPYItl r 1- � / t. N ry N brMubmle[aYbor Mvgtl g / _ • / / • tlPYV.1R IlRare nqunun_ J`' � 6 fly�'y— /r I. Tn a+r nePo-rceM,l MYwen111er �yY / _`�II / 2 YMku6 amMfe Heyes n{YY / //_ / OveNy,yrepmYz whNn 14 Cenlbl Greemuy ¢__ "... 3 WnwNMs artOwn d W Sm/a»flTHr rwaw<uo-n Gu�sauaas Tee(Avpbr TTlGanYTM4£{DbrParGR tl lam if jan mmar ma hCa*I.Dmeel0+a wnm tlMkuYrlc<w 3atNurtS, f "'r^h cietl[i4D -� '1 REF ` + •! D WkhM c"ml G,,wT..y 0Y y ICG-0j "�. _ Mnu Prvndry 0 x[ xcd N6a 0 Nry �en r Yd 3. AI M1 M!.1 01 Ih,Ne loa[pnR M 1M prin{ry 1 e vvm tlrurnlrealu Ahe2aenn �/ - - .a..r - �M.yca < 4u#fnR aRe fmVSl Grexrly '/ _ 5. RWr Yne requlrea { 1 II �4unyn9aWYUunV `�� T .yup wa - umM1ry � pu.wroesa �� [�17rxAAd<age rwn.t'Pw brx»,nnn.'rv.t srn:,x:; QQaw..sMleY aiRa aFUn P,nUYUoclbrwx nx:IP,w wnW fianrsenxl: TMG ifp IwMYUMA bFv !nl'1 b+blti.r WYM{ YUNy{YM(rl 1 YmNM1 L Yrane✓u�. -u.�' JY ro�RMuin ure+�n 1OpvZ3A MnM - Y 1ar�aaw R4nrA{B ane YpYaMtlW W Y IM<a (uWr21A 4wK Wvrw{Nw� W trees Nep Nlxb -nnlA{plcatle I IS{bil neem bµtNn lC. % ✓WPHmirt IUM V6^W F'anr%v<Wxni RANCHO 1N 10415191 ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEIGH80RH000 b CONSERVATION PUIN mc[va H.ao tUCEV Ond+ eVRUC REVIEW URAFT Ip=.t5 t91 141 CUCAMONGA Carriage House 5.4.14 Carriage House 0 _ A. Ske Orgmlhatbn/MmsMing Q OmG "R wsse¢an ossey a.elwl un IADUlleatat E.Pnmaawry eeuceb Cm%ryP ERx4 t...ra Ulm, Urge MNNm. :4 O \. a ESn 1&.INryTypn. t - 3. 1n GrYR Reuse nle¢fe the egir<scary mr < S B �'� Q E 6� aawe MencMMAnR q � ®� E 3. Tb Gr1gR Meuse shall ret euenC eryen0 dr A ® q q,. ' 4etpnm atllesnRen,.Nm Aa4. t S. Fr.INor er S. MXyr MKIltm mx 4a Ran 0ernl¢E. 0 SMEarY¢. SM NI Ow S;,—and la Dinemb4 art EeNmNetl ey fne 8 0&nd Type EUWNt tM amnpsni4 Ib StIBFA�Po➢-'QxG Camyelbme. FORCXRRACf XCK11[ /��// 6. See RCM[ 17.1WtrA br Oqa A[1U Dern NOrrlrvayw,yetTm[4dplY:brc oV✓aR�lOr / " . oarLnpm M)nmt<a.Yf tfn oGMapvdUA`a/ B. Open SpatSpace 1. DYM 5P<r "du... are amaa bi ne � ��. el:IdleryPtlaelleGrrvRXq¢ra¢e�Pn4 C. paP. I. O..w b. Mn a CarNBe Xeuze un4 ineutl buleE+.'ten er atlla[MI N[h rear nb 2. VMiuYr xrrMmtb AraRnmt ea Nregee rxr6ne Ca rPrbrce ywtlM vwp no- my PH awevpngmmwa MMr ^'.:T4M.elemaapmlaa pn.uier¢n4msgriM..wreu�n.ms .imq me, Mmmsensveayfronrq Bo trnfrvryvq<vrge +M,dq Nm...roYw m, eem<r5 NA.M V. smuay rinnla�w.p w.r e.w.regr►1P.1q a.m.uy Nruceu .mwPup / u�q, MAmgrinr I� ' uTa'rva YnpR{p mgmAq t+Yjy ww rm ImVmun my.y,,• Nrmrw w/.w aunYM a'il0nazn� A 4v MIIYIOKa RerT aINW1 fP6'9P'/f rOHYJ'A'I<rtY K. YW�ar2w - Net Applfaele RANCHO IM 1D15191 EPWANDNHEIGHTS NEIGH110"00D4CON%RVATICN'-4N _I r,GEgNEXr:<'V.:AMJNGb I P0811CREYI FIYDBAFT I0Y 15191 ISp INCUC.4M[t(V(nA Medium House 51.E '.;.adiur, House A Ste OMmb.Wr/Nes,IPS _` 1 6aragx art SxMrry BW tip,antl'uY ba �Q ,nYavemin_See UbpalrSt26alletW+ib � :. ulwgaanrcmmanaee alxxwln,r»rar or tln WE!run Mana pYcla uMegnYN — _ 0. Opm Spam .� t. a»ryam ar»ar.auaearorpnerrwvO ahhE / map6Y-±6AOI Iman»nn:+u�. / / L TEeryln+rymV+2esNII EI bAYtl hrM I.M L F n _ 0.rr Isna r[ryn6 VM[uYr xm 1rvn / . • E a 111 a n%Pxnaw Y 0 it 3. PnrtmNimartpemtlM. 4 d. S 06,,ari426aneE hlVftrftMMana / � WawirAttrs,k,MaNs. nsmaNr s,.apyra Yan[n xmaron arFrmawrrr _ � / Cd �.` '' � pyamn�N.a(wmcnparsprani NF N4l` I(M � aMry Ya, vnlmw mra9e�i+, !Yf seam wfuwas'YatlaW MV ma+.»s rrYaq N,n .,an wN, n aEerYYtiv+aema m.wmem �n:=sm7rn� ymr Nu.rraelu nn, m WOtm. a'.+Xfo .e .p �a re _n;xyeoemrmK I2a+.p wsn oti v r m rma.rtrrYN m. __ awnry YmtlpaYWayl ! i L' rn, m .yr m uTro HayNttA Masa .,+a».a,n ea mpmue ,sMnwsY m, S S,Y c. •M IWV+tA I.nN1'An .... " y .'.•Qin aiaa,a �f ]P ces+arov uue, 3 w - I U+110itnrq erxrtlE<y n 5 r< RANCHO V2 Io-11SI9l EPWANDA HEIGHES NEI 6HEORHCOC&CONSikVAT10 N Ol N ,%CHD mluHDa I PUELICFEVIE DRA I0. _ 11i CUCAMONGA Small House 5-4.5 Small House Variation-Side yard House A. Ske bgankatbntNmaMg "- I. SNeYarO Hw¢e'asuhlenmall5rvatl lbwliin " - .- 51anNrCr.anE NPiMSeaf[nk SN<I6n. �- 2. Fbr Sbs YaN House,tram antl<Wrwingr forma _ _ _ ---- O`_ temgl'a<iweritleyru erweenmem. AaPetr3 REAR LANE nawernl 3. F ib MtM"Ina<4res M'sM1atl be Yreit<d pPWnW1<� eaaemert � /aAR in N transparemy se witne aga<em 4A/ea ii T M1e R+«rbe.4n.mCt prayeM pa<em m me amf.ritle roan , / pwbbean<eI h. See Fyn StB / Pf.-0 IIW an , em that en f—ft i' r r 1:1 a M.—0 of qe huiWlgWpropeAP2fortM 1 ' -/ / ertYh EepMaflheb[.Seel-gwei4ffi I J 0 '' / O h. Waperry3 naa an even em an tm iivnim ' / ��� I � sltryardama al PrepeM 1. SM.prE(rola¢sroll any he ak.i,E rvnen - Q` `Y ! apPIIeO[o-an ent'vebb<lfau. L_ _ _ _ STREp`Q'�_ G. TM1a PHmaryenwambNe Smb YarE House ryg �.—� _ hhPVfa Ne Nebr by Ne'ani.eslEM R ' F � Th.aara�rrep beanwrefi am nasty m Raaa STREET .[,Brae gip;:sr�� e. open Spare araPeaayazznomnan.m m«c<W,aa«rcar<P<aaawn I. Tn.apenrPaaearea Waena hepbmmevwPenq rnWw,agPoaAt'swoeamsagea..ao-rvrF<o,,.er Lbm mmeagarantlwBze£ee FYveixae. asvaymaseaa«a a<ew rce yaw AaPw3Bm f G Aetas sPvbe«<nsm agparyls[w<amasaamarcaensw 1. ThePfiresryega mestellEe Mated infhetram a4'na anapbesWej 2 Rxa Une fpllRll.tlM[upr x[Pss fibre 1qm mrawaple9au'uvw m m]PermR4d in�grewvaaroerm uaeq ewruewMyryrcmrgurmur BnM 3. iee ClmpbrSx26antl Tb US.40farPa16agantl gaewrma sa tleM1kularAr«tYaMartls s®+4rY aAFar an■e1 erslaTbWb/i purart g dRn ®r�Wy Wrcm+rf<YtlN414agW fNW rMUY mYnj W49 Rn �"may / Yruanrevuro xbnr � /jjj y r.ea9a W.uro � y/ . u0a rau4N pMrfaal �/ vclrrru aw t¢gbsiq Wnror iM<brtAaNY<peeK qln eyx<GJ<aA itla YmbHw¢ �,r.,, ssAa. r+w+w - rzaa nx ywaanwaW<apsTrmlaspmparcwatt wa)a< 9nR•W'• mmemaxvaRpwp<.ry, m»j•a•aa..bw. �> .... m YerJ a Yy Ragrom Kq Notes -Natlypfsade I Mryheb'rMMiron[mgan 0.asmaber Caun RANCHO W 10415.191 ETIWANOA HEIGHTS NEI GHBORH0006 CO EWRVA=N PLAN CSTOPRANCHOCUGMOWGA I PVBLICREVIEWORAET IW.15.191 147 MICUCAMONGA Attached House 1 5.4.9 Attached A(with Detached Garage) A Ske Orgmltatlon/NnPFg ) t CemPm,daaa Pnmarymamantl MamMgraje /l 2 UP la I YNY rwJ ba,10[ME WN xf ipl[P ^ --,aw•pra\ .. Y2F bebea[n 1Y]erbt MA F[e et aEpom jr¢ups M xw•x'w'�— �IR/'N! r9wM19usm iT, (r /'p a. uxk3y<9nm[mrt3nwetrlaanaam,m,rbm � %: FL. / arEniaY NsewmaaM PYotl uNeyauN- 111 i= B. Open Spare 1. Fatlr jr¢urtl lker w¢WR Nvearxryam br It / / Q anaaltlp SF - �� -- � /� L Pass9s may ercmaµ•ma¢mum N l"ma spe Rao, ryemmncY SlmA be hcmOn Nefmnt SaMwOa¢x39 ,^:wef manNnamrca/u+a 2 Rnr bn.rpu4'ed YMkuN<a[<em frees lmm nal a pW mOmCnma32ta. �O _- �E.F��'- - 3 SmCbop¢er S126ann PebYiPobrParnrgan0 Central Greenaway -- - _-� -� 0. WItfiF General Greenway Overby 1[601 =9�!� ^, n„ •- Irrr i u 1. 4mNw bxwgM-Tl Seton• 1 NNNm Prmary5tlO,3 _..r,.3 ■aa•s"a 3. A bYx At 93 me bmamnrt Or.PrWry um<mrtµatlbe3 ymnY l Ram,Uamt 9mo Cenral Lreera 5 0.pr e rayied tlµ W .kr s[<m fm+Imla „¢„y n9f ce«a[Pa 6. StleYarOSnbck'¢nlmsx lS<o}tat WaM, mwaMVmm¢« T Esd Omperryµstl trw.vea lS 2,nb wRiµ xw>e,aiRmarxvr Wan ,wwPm«:n3am ml mlmtrraaaea»saYbe reuse. �mrw pY.«wr3a, SrroepamSmPa Emm',I fwm,,Ss<ojcra a� roan+YraY[3 m.x<•M>,ru.n.. , y- f Wamim,ga«-Y'YPa ¢wTe]IRMa wmia:.....u._a- 9mC3y YmMP9Naup1 . ¢M^ YSY Yauaar>4Yna Swmay YlCIaY11Y r43 Imm�YY SOo4 m¢n b' iw3 •a6nr �W � a\\ \a / a �mnaasu w.n.w /-. a s+ar.. a amynssa r - -' auH•YM w Saa.n.r.. Rb Na« nary a+r M.wsbn -Nax Appkalp 1 Onas Ha mart PmvYeY a.— _ w..aw ro settr[khem egnem imam Y radebraNf3 A^.aa,6`.[!r,-xu'.2^rn lu�•G u¢a:x��r O'.e'aY b�O.V '4ygC(ra.N�- �RANCHO 1Y IGI 15191 ETIW/1NGp NE16MTi NEIGwQpgl:pOa bCONSFk VPTIGU VL0.N Cln"Or vpNtXO CIIt{fA�_lN.{ I PUBLIC0.EYIFM DRAFT IM15 191 149CUCAMONGA Attached House 2 5.1.111 Accach?d 3 t;,ith A¢ached CaraS=, A. Ste Organitatlon TMassing +. aHPA,eav a.a m a Pn.an aRxi..PPIaNI a9akng aPO +Paao<Rpd. _. uPnuNn h �aay e.xumee wena.nl.u.et _ Is+PaQ ew...nsa Ysaerala4ac.n<gro��r 4 O ,,, wmwn.uc. � � 3. WGH<anmm.n znaJtl MlPotrinarxr Yle 4 � � T 0<0<avege nse•veM1aM PY¢tl uetlRraual- 4 _ 0. O Open Space ` - / t. oayalb..aawnM fav el ue anml GRa.mr rs netne«n«ewm .Q_-�0=�' 4r� // 2 Paseai nay Em.a<nanavnun Mn'vm$ik 13 © Fj C. Aaas 1 Al pnanlnawnas sN[Yekuhil•.Q I.. M1n<MmgzOtarp<ru.AnpP A�+T<Plmxl a'aa... .,rr,1 fT ���-� 2. ftNPerns@y s'0 v.Rrubr a«ea from Irvm <'1/<' �• 3. SaeC�M[ns Y[Mams.Y IVN,W W,..0 ..aan Yt�•a �® , b01f waWwv[a�4ypvN..N W u.q u•l l.sprmu �l v® '(e N 4raM98/nxn ka:Tl Gwolal rY4r:-" ♦ w.rtrwr W.-wup ® .0 ra�rry4rs.puw � r♦• j�� aural • 10 aA44 Oev. 1 W...ntl.u. Zamlva[.tlYyll.uyyMYY1 t Ea •a•a•••.. 104.aAFA a s...•.+44 aaaYr••- � T a s4Yro. ra4ar.cY sM•tvn Y er[.wu.va. �♦ 117 - NctAPPNzd. RANCHO IW laa''S 111 ETWANOA HEIGHTS NEIGNBORH0004 CCa RVATION PLAN ZT J=P4 N,IJI. Il?N9 I PU BLIC RFYIFVJ 0 R.FT 1SI-". 1 151 CUCAMONGA Flex House 5.4.12 Attached Flex A Ske UgmJzad6n/NmsMg i Nxaga.PmmanNpea Jr.prn;hatl a.o acwmo M x[x6aa 6n^cBoryR+ln UIP[ s 2 Lrae&wA A uar la pwnnaO ttwaW Rex / 3 W�q Typ a(SeeAcpwb 26. 9.RWarp-1mJ exoM eJeres b b, m' Y m<enNbnJRf apRexM aY ma p NKPePOeua Rin premas. d. A . Y OPtNiletl er tleta<M aer/uarYIIe roJ WnlaeEmVtin 3QJ'el L��1� �. \ / / 6. TR Denary u[OJ<AbrAIDMM fins T U,61 mro. RN[enM[tiem sneWtl EeIPutN Gla rmrars En wsn.ert aM pYnEUN M. r � / Reye ynu mprnpaurxgronaWrxryf/ Yx VMam[<uor a:< �0���© / e. Open Space amrv�Yumwh mw.xalh'a. O�� .r .O I. aaNdmuMXeDrumslvultl MwaNM arta ler NEwrlry lq Ann0 phy. a-'ZZ Q. � 1. Dastts nJY arcrm<A a naAnun el d'NN Sift � YJNSeIb[b. W?IM x41 x4i R ■ ° 3. AWdIIE Fh.ryRd em/JPTv[9 MAn Vela , NeRnoemmevan - I. Al prM11marsn3s 0100 lxsrtOmme lmm. 2 Rxa Une Mauve6 VM[Jrbill e[aws Imn Ipm nw Derntb6 ..1T 1. Sea CIDPxJ£l26antl TabR SaDb[hrxr@antl VM.vGr F[i Ea 4aMama - r[y+nOrP>mbWo rvvabwegraaw.[vmuneq txayMarsv .wl .,wM1 Wu. L.WaJYUPuma nan[anra<r[audawrniJYu.Pe urc,!. �.x�n We....w.au �. ycrn Feum<pmw<f e•Panapxemaaypr sxr n,rxJ re-W WPP z.nexY Nmxrx�a.nw ma` w .py an'aWpeYtlYIpIFW qe Swnrry •�• WYtl Wlaxx�.a p{. aw M3.rog w W u.. YR1a `.JRq uT•wv< piPviLa <na VaiuM eq II S.xJ.p 4e ppa<i{A .JsrWwq T,w. a wrex Jwwtts xnM`M+ ae.e....xx N. xmvpxa aMAmn UT �noaµptame i Reµ.n war LJ.e RANCHO 1'A I6a n5 a9, ETIWANOA HEI6Xl5NE16X60RH0604:LN5F0.VAl1DN 0LAN iIT[J:Ad FIiN0:UU1uONva I POfILICREYIFaY 0RUT 1Ai 15191 155 LmCUCf11dCNGA Shops & Restaurants 5.4.13 Shops&Restaurants I C-1,iHam ..1-10s... 1. Cpnpreatl q a prnary Han eHmetl aP by /JJ Sbgrort frorRa® requu'emann bee 6nper iso 3. Axentlnwu rew elalugrOma may mt ea:ee0 IlA'.N Irtenadel T by.IdC msubs wall t adLuH M CWS,. dya o 0(H6Malk j,~ \ 8.k Pudk CWS,. nOwpsiBl ! 3. fildblrp tMtmmspFnn*narearotappYfbrt+R OWL,� l Typcb x[dalEl. e. 6mdbrg mry dery mebman 2awr�.nw.erer Q 251arYa aaY de<pnblbna>r approreE dY tte J % Re6dbrlboE%anp<«eaa jB. Openn Space C.® t_ es ppensprc>raylraLL Cn evyp«nsrwjrwe«wurm bn nmsv 1. Por a wriety al Shagrpnt FmrYbe Types.ase NgwriSE. ��- "CI " 1 F4eb�e nVWrtE 3. N omeF paAmd IM Iwtlp space anaq u a n[ vci uL. _ -' brlbtlaxlY mrpfina bt. aan.e - � l $ee('bvpW SQ6anO paPY tapbrpar4�gantl - •"�� Yed"erYr Ntus SarEaN1 a.!V w1a Prnr� w[owpvagmmraa �'�. .xar.nN Oroan[IYaa3gI1!e Ml _ Nr+.wrroYw �a Cofe Smnrrpunnr'so xanaansrywraxawan. suaa P.dn�w.y sY.-Yqn r. s.mr.9 rwypumpl O p.,. mre!ry zuua 4lrYDlNyrl r MaY YaTa r a as9< 6�. rI00r use ro.!mu RYtNraaA aarMm D !4gY11Y 1 Weryrgn nm D 8®pma.• !rgerayp e+Yaa > m'vo.y uy emvaan Sam amWo<«Ow<pe nrc. - KW N. P Wrw Rear U'e paeean ux puWrrvm av sxcn..,-.<r.+ , RANCHO 1S6 ID415191 ETIWANDA HEIGHTS NEI GH60BHD 00 1 CONSERVA116 N PLAN O' Uf sFNC+G CUCtUGH'ua i PUSLICXFVIEWDGRI0.'1"^I 157 CUCAMONGA Large Front Yard 5.5.3 Large Front Yard Large FrontYard-Variations C. open [lonctp .by 1bopenmsssw I...Adlhlf.m ,,dy hien a seamlpssNwiN lknd miFMmr'v18Valtls.0 �e nezwaem[halMe:Nawae ftmoamft Is I me bnataPe of tir Front nmw Ie may W - - �S -is 11 t Id' , .erred lawn anm«Moa ane mwBlx.mlenm ev wYmxBs. db eUx MN ib dtoWlRehr 2 O"IteW I'Pat whM YR lett. . 1 s ��LL ��`` �wMpassnareaW�nau wn M1ernrtM t 1 I ®�} �B.l�.� � &d[r«Iydraaoz haw+Nmlre+Pa _ � 't� maM,ermKefrrapia - o. E Clvrs[tare.detl by Its el t. d..¢ he abea Io mweea,e pre.aNnBdee aatlnorcbm abear.mlof /� Pneasy by plyanXYsepanteg de eueucslhwdlkaM um (r�II pw.ran tgmym men abdn[tly. e � 1'!B QF mdl —M eenar he ImasMatl Imh Ne dean A. D.pd... (a Ne rplurafeds pnd:ape f,ne bt wnen nei V"dmth N .meme wlMhx ermorlaMed wanInP.egWaMgZoned NGt NF ana0.tM Pnmaryse,bcke.least 35 fa bK-n hesew�.Host MgawsuMar6 tar N" emithe noiN eieepl6. Vora Ramvaramepmdoninamdvw¢ned¢oftH tapeanweLL4Nxspedepen Nam paraswfm.adeairom p+N I {U Neanewsltmmetra.,amm em*rd areahwaramdesaprorrllicn.armauae e,untPearmae, elemnrb nebpd mnmaaaabed lewnarws areakoalMedw pq.nde pbydrN:.HempsaNnp mnM mry ytpaQ tam himtun and wrk[y siartm¢eWralNemen6[Ni elVaa[M1 en tneimmya.0 B. Sle6da1ds and GLI 1. hm[a[oss.AnNpum6'wlde PeMsinan W[11 .• •a a igntMSWenaltwN f itl rk requima. anta le. i Mm. Max. E. BPllned F gee CbmcMYad hYa and Nat en Ws«Nefgm)drawee. 2 lanWopn&pNer w pYMC 1755076C a.tl [eeyamkm,ammea. lanikoln GutlNlnw UpPW5i6 b. lanp:repe(SY11mn,Yamarea) 565 � W 3. Grad Fmm Nsmust is -mum to N[rd: p (Y far. d::� - 5p% I. Wslh tu0 ea s.ePZMu[RM 3'Iren Me ha t .y W e Pe of sitl 6t Ibw 4�z[apkl6antlx WbAczlde ■ ! NOS%wwaNNeztrenM d n+g.Maxsbpe WaN IINBIrt tMarltagelwv0 b5� EbctetlY.Hader - d' 2 Gam la M1oultl ee a 1 tl rcYtl "� / d robin Nails weeM«Nry are nabs«n efa 6rad16 Front Yam 0.5% E% hhkm bem ce prtihl wiNNe�6 yy__ MYarafaVnlB we61«an ekwledprrd ora Gn�vl R r alnw Gntle at afN P�mdrymasswM1a bmW tll .tea d `^�O <am1W.,denNneefonmeteceeLd. ® ,Huck 18' 3' a1u MdwN huPwIB.S Otrapt £108C. 3. WalbeMh2n NSIM t mimwa bum., 1 5 � s. Hm.eaH.W,: 2uate0 tip Ne mmb;Mm. PONmFmn mwwmn a' N.axMu,meawre M:EAa,etl Yard HeatR seaum ee tleaignM as aNleBml Nement or Ne Grattl6 an From Yard ally G.W Float,above bndsvpe of wM1cete � ey Wrt Graaea,setea[t. RANCHO 162 04 IS 191 kT1WgN0A HEIGHTS NEIGNBOkNUOU KCONSFRVAIION PLAN CIn'iJF nRNCHCa CUCVd ONLd I aUBtC REVIEW O0.AFT 10015191 163 WCUCAMONGA Small Front Yard 5.5.4 Small Front Yard Small front Yard-Variations C. Elevates-Porch __ I Portl6 m+ym<rp+<n mprroWmnfm2aelN[ks ��` - --- - uPmthel'mttaAwPobytKmnelIDBYii01 . ' — _ 2 POMns may ab rrnP arwM a turner el IM1r aayy I�A 3�� b D.1b Thh may etpanaubryapprapNYm� �, � 5tl �{.A 1 �I '�� ! �I F':.,I�..T [am« tt. n1 Q I��p fit. I ' 1 ■ r0 i r� � IT _ j 0. Elfvbt+yf-Roup ® it'll, ` `t© I AStwP^aY Y«itla,cmm to anefrMn Braune. IFp 1111 �� ' Q �.a 4` I Poor tl.ahip. 0 �„ z SlpfPamav muwM meY.b.daw[p 1M xmA ` 1 ..< alrmptl evmezemtrmhtsln � r y. untlanPErcMPWtl ee Wevnetl In meremammd � _ 1� ` t Pmau Me N[lne«NnheE Ind[ft.noun a.<emp,l-IGalt.+m aveaV 0. Deuflptlon . wnrayY �[ m6 �'" OIn u'linm une NGS tM%vaan a.k mmwa. 4aus m��en t«sfoep lrmYHp+ntl + Fr«vuNm,mv .r .'Dux lux - nlbWMeuta¢WSn, HrtlapM hn nNGS Kurz ,n pmHek.plM<ene:ve.:tnm«cn+na lelbn ,IiNiRr ID ,I.FqA TaN m, R. tN WIER +ssMwnm Ne Oipam pnNelpll>np Q I emssary biN a prwry mr mltlmms.Tle meat Gst Ml ha✓tIB,IIwNdt®YB 3" neon. W+r+aa[nall NewYtl er atyntle 6aNen lem[etlnxla E [MYE YaN XetM1[ 3' Irani gm MW[kn"IIIWb..n vulm I , Id Cyadngenfgmuam b.M SM xrtN propnTyFg3-M3M1eut an wxlmen!tutu Yrtl u ® Creuntl Ebur aeon 4ap at NnafvrdtMYam pylglgntMVaM1 y<em+¢neasYry. MbaIS l e. scMBPaa¢acpmeEYa b.PoahtrpMlne[n[ltleymazY d- F. I.I ma, Mhln JnfWa NmWf Iy+Ntmym�w I ElRavtl.Flrobtl M«n pNa may ee m[baed p PaanMYn IG e+¢xq}fMaWxtnesM>Ik 1Y(M16fl1m[n was mannHnpua a[mett H'n lPgmaea» Pnannue.IwHnr IT 11 r,aB algn e,nr.Pbab q[Iq GPE«q, vMa0. 8 RmrisgnY IS' 3' 6WIYIg Gtlt(CBO 2 M-dNde.Small I..yams a .d.e.,1.DID GiwEnnWxhartlfmm PL 5 E [igYfPmngmwNe maYNPrf+netlnM6+m b �- ;. 4 nauan embangmA tIRR.Ne vDiNn lkantl3 Gam sNl ee tln¢nrtl tf nf[wmH Inm tAo .�.IH II = y frmn Yam«Ne.06n,nett PnrMe a smap O Siw P+rlAn !' B' slMwaBares. ro ur M.h wnh.dIuW fMra Ne e.Mlnd SmePtltPihpwt nXluGRsun) a' I' l TnearYu datlepfeWaiN yams sNllnm et Q \_ e Iw D..It IS.,InNn ade y' SwoPBmrM{fk IH• ]' -.nTNn3'sepx lba9,certsne eB erPubtr ` A Tr nudban. A YNW 1E vWntttnm[e M1eYn - 3- OPmSOam _Z-Q {O P aqY eeaz.n the utl &ro ntlMtfrant pnd-ilh mc«+n Y[tlatl EYR'Iaamanntlaptn m PnNitle a .I tgmagn/bWer bN,raen N. pWEMEPtl'/[+'anGY fahmgtVamilpn/tun H+bratnralantlmOpfl.106U Y6x+lk[omR 2 Fem pe«n lbwm mp of p<rN mLr+^+ YYanrtBfrfm.tly[m[fIM gtldmtle ("RANCHO 1ba Ina1519I ETIWANOA HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD&CONSERVATION PLAN 1¢5 CUCAMONGA Shopfront 5.5.5 Shopfront Shopfront Variations _ C. GaOe w nn,.. , aaN na Pl, w 1 ktry rraNe de¢xan in iM 0.0.W. sul{t5f w Me'm W li@at ap eMrPa[Iln M Pprmh ofG<pl6pagrtem MpfYrbi%W2e0}d WIT1inS pwn¢(0.1HC12A0.630). �� '' 2 Column lmkmsMUlp Oed-Rtv�esm Wnnw',@n -+6 3. Was td kl emni,i alsMrh'.d d. Walk wMo ope Rs ultl np exnetl 10 iia E. Colu � R stloub[wrmlwntl ta AeMwm rt. ayl!- V 6 Plamw hnx ry h¢gotl in 6[[wwn In, '�'i, - —� [olu p IeterclnurelerxuN u:¢asafe _ _� _ © © o h Hfth( > DepM(Uatl t n<erbr[abmnfxet 1116 of . `'� a. N.YN( e Ikw[enng),1,G' Y. Terraces dge.ftt *rlk M[en bWlh ma m 3lenngtrerarbwtrllunUw aga<M __ ______ - xleemn PWn open space.waYnave�6 �. ,� anamN IZ'Pntgntantllea.YraErpywMe �+ ;._ f Ff 0 1� M1eYIk Wl.ehr CaYPmx nmm�aeae.(®ca Ter sn b future pnmen w Ip,&. �-- ""'° °""° rL.6, m enelpw pwaeeslaeeanes.atNg a eA. - A. Aesc[IPtion3. uaxkRnnN Rcc1E6' y NenresbelNalwnln ine50.reguNtulgmnenmtabwane.moorage resya[�saml barshaniran NePNklksbM& d. WNimum tlppinmNeplwm loupe:$ _y( y.�'�d latex Aden ironwge.Tnus selha[Asareb fen(ImneeBWy engage.win tnesYemYl The Slnplrpm m Wsb falm ka :yi lF nReapanhgin thetatatlealwnwrtnobawR.en<bsetlwYM1 marsan0 tmmprM glass In aswMrantasu^•hy.IDe = pmnaroemramePnwe�mmma<ax m m.gmulb Pmr userslmemx¢remlrw amnhenuml e6nan<emprismgme narermm are kRt wMwx..oars wnnaux<mnam amm.rs.ane,mlb xnaPlmm ease.optional elMetR¢¢hme ymhm.onitieaeree.nee rant orumpv sgrobe.IYntbg ammr�Na varotbm bntrorgnUsMwmrb�s xrcattakz br pwdelrgeemcaNtl s«6R. e. Stan Uares bS6 fnes I. wee. Wall.IL snaptram< xn¢om nainnin a e 1. Depen nein ekew l6 J'i7 —y ��1 n1ek1N1 saeewah ey 'main'alg 6 xmead. 2. WiMRrbegemim.aumefl6'arefamaximun J Sreekabng50.mnes InO fa ewhkr sitlrw6s Glannae alM«a YIN YA% at1A. b pard.spaaft,rafttn8-See Rearw 3. Alery M1 RerPknMnryerl[Merttesutl EWEN for Artletenu Gudetnn rePaemB t6lgMnmpet6am¢n tY Sfwplmlm. ® NeiaKw helnn¢}mnK' a• Ir - � a �� 1 Gnu.M Slnln,sntIll Nue SreatertMn IM WWIn NSM1OP1Nr¢4ay5) 1C :4 [eating 0 H Nof~,knl Se. 1' 3' X 3, Shkh Ittk[ dilinglIkI k eaealedD only ime LlassbalBraulMaaarsgllarw Tb m 1 -.In 1Euig itSl.h..,tlkalee FaN bysnt. ® r^nn1POePln d' mlbin Iti it ilki. wtmrvn I. My. - SwMrom asxrmhhs ece�r helween fliers.Bays Naux areneaxuree htfwem[nemmeelW alwN i'x. CyrnwhuUdR. RANCHO 166 1Oi 15.191 ETIWANOA HEISHTSNEIGM100.HOOD&CONSERVATIONVLAN C-iTr 11-11, Cr'I rapt"I" I n USLICREliRW DRAB 1 1t In, CUCAMONGA Shopfront 5.5.5 Shopfront Shopfront Variations C Gaftdes..m P,.en 1 w,•m.e>cn e.r m.W.w m I*ROW. ,—CROAe umax erae.ecrN<Y.M P•rm a w0[ersea(reenM prbrro mwrceala huJaing p 2 CeWnn MRw sMJeb.l�5lim es[aW�n vtlln U4 ` L.;Iq 3- Raxupm<klmm ee{eef<ure:6 V� d. W,Ib vrYneut epMlgs saeuw nx Naea Ib i I.�� 5 eumn sp+ipg eu <arrmw wrm m ,yy , %a !aw mry be papa In b+l.m+n 1h, 7 y /$�yr W I pawtle•rtl,sunlwsu[n minae 1 .=}f`�'_ Z GepN(laoenP.Mi,rbrceWmnfa<ei R-16' 0{�=� y{ ! r Hpm Wtl+m.m<•iYgllbl6' \-_fes D. Terraces 1 The sw+{e prat el m•Wo[r ilwutl roI Ct nantivn3 Yeln$AIe<bw,rMantls Bsl>[em _� a^ewaa erpwt owe sw<e.w,Y marrmna IRI f�gA® �7� + mowminnneam e�mwlpmnv ��� n.¢m,ePP.w W,.,.pb. e'.r{ceeettan 2 TWrxa mautl Mture pYnan ar Inrmuw Mlummrtnemro pm'Meaheeanesxwl{. A. Descrlptbp 3 wsYlglnal wrNWIW - NnmmeMa:me aunndepmmmepfmmmae'.p .'M I - YReawala{m tlu famtlrn arnxnnestl.w+Nm<pees wan men+eavamwrM{Ysa;naawrwrem a.[.mey.me pn.>n•mnm.pmNm mm[IN<mwmtamuae{earm.Yl trema r.auwe,mlwamnl+YmmmanpNn{mry wrmmm,.e Ytge wwws.axn.nn{Yrc mrsam Winm.n.>N a x!a snaplW n wre Gpxwal mw.ee.alame e.nlp.nnuwereea MtlreJ wwnapy sgNR E&Inmp,ne<er¢m.YsrY[bn wntne rrfNrlaw.rbmsb'neEn ar P'aamar{ae0aama+NJR e. Staam.res&G.He . E. Remssed I Saw[ W.I. Sneplr. N.1d naMam a • .a 2 fl nae eceea l6'_ 116'ene+ma+inu+ n.'N,.N b,maVmiJn80 x[xm_ ErpnmEe aemen< , Ie N I'm wr ry'n+nlnnune AmnawIlSS0.za1INSIYA N+ewimr pema4 J _ __.___ wwe.Ae span lar ule sxlis{.See OApMr 3. Al.vat lmw.wpYrm<nrypr[baercrosaa ....... £N.BH YrArcMlMunl Gutlefinn rsgsNM6 N+Ial+m wpetvamam' 12' IS sheplromarN. It'uu;, !��\ p iMamm W.al+.ne¢' a W - 1 2 GYe.Atl{I+ivrprMl Ml Nee prt,lxtlnn IfM WWn00"fmmwf ) 19 35 I� Intra{ ® Htltmef rlppmm b,u I' I 3. Snq/mnt8xa.5neplmm OaP+re means mm Clan EalpmYNlawr.ImrN A 90 u+ymnm•Wuema Caress eWmME,m bym.{ p•mn{Drpn r I- min rs <onMm verrrnm quem an Eapnlmm aur•nhlwt e<ar h+mwn Wrn.Bap Nm+ +nnxiuve Maeenite[MMIrcJ N[n pe[. I Dxr. 2 Urm<bultlR ttla XRANCHO 5191 Ei1WANGA Mfl GNTS NEIGN80RND00&CONSERVATION PIAN vq.:(un rn^gCq�!(.a � vCEt!C REVIEW ORaFE IGa 151?I f6/ CUCAMONGA Transfer of Development Rights RANCHO CUCAMONGA Habitat Conservation and Transfer of Development Rights • Maximize open space and prioritize habitat conservation in the Rural/ Conservation Area (RCA) through a complementary strategy with Neighborhood Area development. • Generate funding from Neighborhood Area development for the permanent preservation and ultimate restoration and long-term maintenance and management of the lands in the Rural/ Conservation Area: ■ Habitat Mitigation and Acquisition • Conservation Management Endowment • Transfer Of Development Rights • No new tax burdens on existing residents RANCHO CUCAMONGA EHNCP TDR Program • The EHNCP TDR program is a voluntary, incentive-based, and market-driven approach to preserve land in the Rural / Conservation Area and steer development away from these upper foothills into the Neighborhood Planning Area. • The Program is based on free-market principles and pricing that would motivate RCA landowners and Neighborhood Area developers/builders participation. • Rural / Conservation Area landowners realize economic return through the sale of development rights to private developers/builders who are able to build additional units in the Neighborhood Planning Area. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Transferable Development Rights • Simply put a transferable development rights (TDR) program creates a market for willing buyers and sellers of development rights. • The mechanism allows landowners to voluntarily sever the right of development associated with land ownership from the land as a separate right and converts it into a marketable commodity. �s 0 WQ^w .w0.p� ydne �^u as^` • Landowners in "sending areas" (areas designated for preservation) are permitted to sell their development rights to landowners or developers in designated "receiving' areas, who are permitted to build additional units if they purchase development righs. • Willing buyers of the development rights are granted,incremental increases in the number of units allowed within a designated receiving sites. • Once the development rights are sold from the property, the land is protected from future development in perpetuity with a conservation easement. The conservation easement is held and manage by a qualified conservation entity. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conceptual TDR Diagram sending site receiving site development rights Q units at base zoning * transferred dwelling units RANCHO CUCAMONGA TDR - Components of Success • The success of the TDR program hinges on stimulating developers to purchase development rights as a means of obtaining an increase in entitled units. • Resolving potential imbalances between the demand and supply of development rights. Incentives may be required. • Where there is a large disparity in land values between the sending area and the receiving area, the number of allowable units on the receiving sites will need to increase in order to equitably compensate the sending area landowner in the receiving area. As proposed the City acting as the TDR Authority may adjust the transfer ratios as needed to resolve such disparities. RANCHO LN CUCAMONGA Who Benefits and Who Bears the Cost? • Effective TDR policy seeks to minimize the inequities between the two parties. • "Willingness To Pay" - Receiving-area landowners benefit from the increased density, which is capitalized into the value of their land. The increase in land value must be greater than the cost of the TDR required for additional development; otherwise the receiving-area landowners would have no motivation to acquire development rights. • Sending-area landowners experience a decrease in the value of their land due to subsequent loss of development potential, but are able to retrieve this loss by selling development rights. If the decrease in the value of the land is greater than the revenue received through the sale of the development right, sending-area landowners would have no motivation to sell them otherwise. • Community residents benefit when they experience preserved open space with minimal increased impact upon their neighborhood and minimized expenditures of public money. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation Incentive TDR Program — RCA Ownership Pattern The Rural/ Conservation Area ir. includes 2,463 acres " of land not i _ -- i permanently ! 13` i conserved. Of those, 1,253 acres are in private ownership ,o -0ilg7rN0 } I _-_ i 5 Conserved and Managed Conserved not Managed Icnar r I h _ pr,.e,>i fanrsa Public Land I e e I Public Land/Likely Conservation Private Land/Undeveloped ® =� Private Land/Developed Neighborhood Area RANCHO CUCAMONGA Determination of Development Credit • The number of development credits that may be transferred from a Rural/Conservation Area parcel to a Neighborhood Area phase/sub-area is the number of units that could be developed on the Rural/Conservation Area parcel considering the maximum density allowed based on the regulating zone, slope density standards, and environmental constraints (e.g., fault zone, wildfire and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI), riparian or streambed environs, flood zone, etc.). • The minimum number of units transferred must be one. Fractional/decimal results of calculations for the number of residential units that could be developed shall be rounded down to the next lowest whole number. • Density transfers must occur prior to subdivision of the Neighborhood Area phase/sub-area to ensure the subdivision maps are prepared consistent with the maximum allowed density. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Multiplier • To maximize contiguity of preserved open space, a multiplier may be applied to incentivize the transfer of development rights from priority areas, such as properties abutting (i.e., touching) existing permanently preserved areas (e.g., North Etiwanda Preserve) or properties with high habitat value. • The priority areas and development credit multipliers shall be determined by the City or a qualified entity established by the City ("TDR Authority"), and may change over time or based on the circumstances of the requested development credit transfer. PANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation Priorities Lands adjacent to the existing North Etiwanda Preserve ...... and other i preserved open spaces to --- 'y3 provide larger i > i 17`: contiguous ! " conservation areas -------------------- and _„- __________and habitat +10 linkages. I: II _ Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) Neighborhood Area (NA) i' Naim 1 _ � _ _ _� S:m.r is fn,ar It Conserved and Managed Conserved not Managed X Recommended Preserves `- y +✓J :J ll- A Etiwanda Heights Preserve B Deer Canyon Preserve C Clark Preserve RANCHO CUCAMONGA Eligibility for Density Transfer • Development Credit transfers may allow for greater units than would otherwise be allowed in a Neighborhood Area phase/subarea. • The total overall Plan density shall not be exceeded. • A "development credit" is a potential entitlement to construct one residential unit above the that set forth in Table 5.3 "Total Dwellings" for the Subarea for which the development credit is being transferred. • TDR Authority may serve as the buyer of development credits. Development credits would be purchased at market value or other value as legally negotiated or established by the TDR Authority from any willing seller in the Rural/Conservation Area. If the TDR Authority purchases development credits, those development credits would be offered at legally negotiated value to the Master Developer/Builder. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Market- Based Transactions • These density transfers are market-based transactions of development rights from the Rural/Conservation Area. Rural/Conservation Area landowners act as voluntary sellers of development credits, with the number of development credits determined by the City. • An appraisal of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel(s) development rights will determine a value; • However, the purchase price will be based on the buyer's willingness to pay for the development credits (e.g., TDR Authority's determination of Rural/Conservation Area parcel(s) conservation value/ priority, or Master Developer/Builder's pro forma based "Willingness To Pay". • A market-based price for each transaction will be negotiated between the seller (Rural/Conservation Area landowner) and the buyer (TDR Authority or Master Developer/Builder). • The associated TDR transaction and long-term management costs of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel(s) will be factored into decision-making process. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Density Transfer Process The following steps are required to ensure an efficient transfer of density process: • 1. Submittal of a preliminary site review application for the privately-owned Rural/Conservation Area parcel(s) to the City, including payment of application processing fees. • 2. City determination of the actual number of residential units which could be developed on the Rural/Conservation Area parcel(s). • 3. Determination of the long-term conservation management cost of the conserved property by the Conservation Area Land Manager. • 4. City Manager or designee approval of the request. Planning Commission and City Council review and approval is not required. • 5. Payment of any fees due to the City (TDR Authority) and Land Manager, including endowment funds for the long- term management of the Rural/ Conservation Area parcel(s). • 6. Execution of the density transfer through the following instruments to the satisfaction of the City: • a. Notice recorded against the Rural/Conservation Area parcel that extinguishes the development rights (e.g., deed restriction) but does not preclude future use of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel for habitat mitigation, or fee title transfer of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel to the City (TDR Authority) or Land Manager; • b. If only a portion of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel's density is proposed to be transferred, a lot line adjustment or legal description shall be recorded delineating the portion of the Rural/Conservation Area parcel that has no development rights; and • c. The City's index and official records of density transfers subject to this Plan, shall be updated RANCHO CUCAMONGA Administration and Management • A qualified entity or entities, such as the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District (IERCD), would be named by the City as the Land Manager to be responsible for long-term conservation management of any permanently preserved Rural/Conservation Area land. • The Land Manager may hold fee title or conservation easements in the RCA. The Land Manager through its fee ownership or grant of conservation easement shall have access to manage, restore (if needed), and monitor (as needed) all land in the Rural/Conservation Area that becomes preserved through the Conservation Incentive TDR Program, and the Habitat Mitigation and Acquisition Program. • The Land Manager's activities and operations are expected to be funded through the establishment of an endowment from the Master Developer, and which may occur through payments or fees associated with the Conservation Incentive TDR Program, and/or through the development of alternative funding mechanisms, such as a Community Facilities District (CFD) administered by the Land Manager. RANCHO CUCAMONGA MinimizingImpacts of Rural Development RANCHO CUCAMONGA Minimizing Impacts in R/CA 5.9.2 Rural/Conservation Area Building Standards How they are minimized by the Plan f J - 4 ' � r 238 =I`. 1 "IND A,,:I. 11,11 PC R L'O D&CC Minimizing Impacts within the R/CA How they were estimated /'� 1-acre 250-foot • Scaled diagrams of Homesite _ _ Fuel mod buffer --------- --------------- 10 --- ---' 1racre, 20 acres 30 acres housing clusters ILP • Assumptions re numbers of each - I ° cluster type , a i a no' �. 970' - - — - 970' _i 1 Home 4 Homes 8 Homes RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation/ M itigation RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conservation Existing Vegetation Community Mapping vwpetabon Communlbe:ane rand Cover Types: BMM-&0leaf mounban mahogany chapand CemwnZas-Bach ted mourdn maM1opany-CalMomba buckwheat Croaxwe GNas-Seen leaf mounfan mMa9ny,hamu CBS-Cald.nwa Weleah.d snub 'r ��_} ,� r ; _ •� CB-WSS C.a ,.buckwhea-venae sap.scrub ICBS Cdlorria sapabrush snob -t CSB-08 Caldorn,a Sagebrush-Cdifara DrKkw vd soma s1 ' �- tl11 —I.Med-EnlacSalaq CY9omie spebuerr-Celllania bw:kwheabaNte saps VF - � 1��1 r ®CSW-Cdllomm w®mwe v.00andle ®Plant-0ueagr-Cdilomra ayCHrlgreSa84t Irce aak CC-Ch...chaeawd CWC-Chapand vft mom dray 1 Mefes-Edfas-Chamee-California buckwheat AtlefasEnfaaSalapi-ChemseCdpwnia buGwheat white sage AtlelasSdala-Chanty white sage DWS-Dear weed snub EG(SNS)-Eucalyptus groves HYSS-Harry Yerba Sita Snub �apr-Harry Yefba Sara-Wide saps SMI, ®UHCC-ObNAeE Hoary laid oranothus chapanal �C.Addas-Hoary bad oeanoh.,lh.mrse —_—_---_— - NNG-Madlerranean Caldoma nee rahzed annual and peranrval prai9and -- PBS-Rneoosh&nib ——.•_. SCBR-B 18 brodm eaub :WSS-While capes b l�Sd a-Eras-whe,sage-Calilomra buclwhea _ Sdw-Antal-Vyhre sage-Ccllf vno sapebnM _---_-._ (_'ROD-Ruderal i DH-PduNed HMzMt _ .DEV-UNNDevdopeC �— Regulating Plan 1 1 1 I 1 I 13 ' Key for Figure 5.9.18-Sub-Zones i � Hillside IR-HI 12 p=-_] Conservation (R-C) I � I 1 _ Open Space (R-OS) Flood ControlIU llky Cowldor (R-FUUC) — — — — I � I I � �1 10 I I 3�, 't 19 I 45 6 . L Neighborhood Estates (NE) ��--'– al .__ Neighborhood General i (NG-1) L Neighborhood General 2 (NG-2) s Shops&Restaurants (SR) Central Greenway Overlay (CG-O) ,J School Site * Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Vegetation Impacts within the Neighborhood Area ■ A total of 827.82 acres will be impacted within the Neighborhood Area . • Impacts include 376. 21 acres of sensitive vegetation communities (i .e. scale broom scrub (including disturbed) and white sage scrub) . ■ Mitigation would occur at a minimum of a 2 : 1 ratio, subject to agency approval . ■ A total of 752.42 acres would be required for mitigation . RANCHO CUCAMONGA Sensitive Upland Vegetation Mitigation Minimum Mitigation Required for Impaids to Sensitive Upland Vegetafion Communities Vegetation Permanent Impacts — NA Mitigation Requiredz Community (acres) Mitigation Ratio' (acres) Scale Broom Scrub 373.20 2:1 746.39 White Sage • 3.01 2:1 6.02 • 376.21 — 752.42 Notes: I Mitigation ratio subject to agency approval. 2 Mitigation lands may include other vegetation communities in addition to scale broom and white sage scrub. RANCHO IM CUCAMONGA Mitigation within the RCA : ■ In order to mitigate for impacts to sensitive upland vegetation communities, lands within the RCA would be acquired for conservation and long-term management. ■ EHNCP Recommended Preserve, totals 749.04 acres and includes: • the 337-acre Etiwanda Heights Preserve; • a 200-acre SBCFCD-owned parcel located in the northwestern portion of the RCA; • a 212-acre area, including a parcel owned by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and two smaller parcels owned by the Inland Empire Resource Conservation District, located in the northeastern corner of the RCA. RANCHO LWCUCAMONGA Recommended Preserves �.._. ._.._.._.._.._.._ `e/ _ 11 13 X10 Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) Neighborhood Area (NA) i is w i Conserved and Managed r is ? / --- r Conserved not Managed X /// Recommended Preserves /r Etiwanda Heights Preserve B Deer Canyon Preserve C Clark Preserve /� Edwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO LM CUCAMONGA Mitigation within the RCA : ■ The RCA also contains lands that are both conserved and actively managed (i.e., North Etiwanda Preserve) and those that are conserved but not managed. • The EHNCP will prioritize the conservation of the areas separating the North Etiwanda Preserve and the two recommended preserves, RCA Etiwanda Heights Preserve and the SBCFCD parcel, by providing Habitat Acquisition and Mitigation Funding and a Transfer of Development Rights Program to encourage and enable expanded conservation to link the three preserves into one to the extent feasible over time. RANCHO LM CUCAMONGA Potential Conservation Lands within the Rural/Conservation Area Available for Acquisition Conserved Recommended (Conservation and Conserved and Land Designation (Not Managed) Preserve Management) Managed EtiwandaNorth Preserve — — 652.45 336.85 — — San Bernardino County Flood 11.23 200.24 — — Control District (SBCFCD) U.S. Forest Service 2 77.23 — — — City of Rancho Cucamonga 159.78 Inland Empire Resource 52.18 Conservation District 87.66 — 1,252.84 — Off 1� 274.22 — 460.86 — . 450.34 749.04 1,713.71 652.45 Notes: 1 These lands will be conveyed into the RCA Etiwanda Heights Preserve for conservation and management with project implementation. 2 These lands are managed by the U.S. Forest Service; however, there is no formal management plan. 3. Totals may not sum due to rounding. RANCHO 4 CUCAMONGA Existing Conserved Lands �.._.._.._..- -: _.._..-..-..-.....-: � I 11 13 -..__-.. �..-..-.._..- - I `\ •-10 1 W.Ed ( I I Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) Neighborhood Area (NA) ( 3 � Conserved and Managed �•f-- ----_ 7; Conserved not Managed ® :� 'u.. Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA Impacts within the RCA : ■ Large areas within the RCA are currently designated by the County of San Bernardino General Plan (County of San Bernardino 2007x) as Special Development Residential, Hillside Residential and Rural Living, where residential and commercial development are allowed. • Adoption of the EHNCP would implement the City's General Plan designations for the RCA Area. Limiting development (i.e., permitted development would exclude areas with greater than 30% slope and those occurring within the fault zone) on privately owned lands within the RCA. ■ A maximum of 100 homes and up to an estimated 630 acres of habitat could potentially be impacted by new rural development. The number of potential rural residencies and the acres of habitat impact per residence would be far less than allowed under existing County zoning. RANCHO LM CUCAMONGA R/CA Ownership Pattern 1 I 00 j 1 -Y,$ I j Conserved and Managed Conserved not Managed I _ &'r1ar4 ^.�,J 'I 2ereiA impu; � Public Land Public Land/Likely Conservation I I 1 Private Land/Undeveloped 'l//r Private Land/Developed ® m Neighborhood Area RANCHO CUCAMONGA Benefits of Mitigation within the RCA : The proposed acquisition approach for mitigation will provide the following benefits: 1. reduce the risk of development within the RCA, 2. provide a large habitat block with connectivity to existing preserve areas for the protection of sensitive habitat used by special-status species, 3. allow for enhancement of distressed or disturbed vegetation communities within the conserved area, 4. allow for type conversion (restoration) of disturbed or non-native land covers to native communities, 5. include a comprehensive Preserve Management and Monitoring Plan to direct management of the entire contiguous block of land, and 6. include a financial source to pay for management of the entire preserve area. RANCHO INCUCAMONGA Conservation Priorities �.._.._.._.--. _.._.._.._..—I It 1 _ I I a __— I r� A l I 4� -I-io I Rural/Conservation Area(RCA) Neighborhood Area (NA) � Conserved and Managed ,r Conserved not Managed X _ 11 _ Y.¢ Recommended Preserves Nf,;;01i !- —•--•.' AIM,70 Y A Etiwanda Heights Preserve �.I,I B Deer Canyon Preserve I I J L. C Clark Preserve ® dh ...... Occupied Private Parcel - -- XIRANCHO CUCAMONGA Jurisdictional Resource Impacts Neighborhood Area ■ There would be permanent impacts to 71 .38 acres of non- wetland waters or streambeds under ACOE, RWQCB, and/or CDFW jurisdiction within the NA site. Mitigation would • A total of 51 . 62 acres of non-wetland waters or streambeds within the RCA Etiwanda Heights Preserve would be conserved with project implementation . ■ At a minimum, an additional 19.76 acres would be acquired within the RCA for conservation and management. ■ There are approximately 461 . 53 acres of jurisdictional resources within the RCA. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jurisdictional Resource Impacts Neighborhood Area Minimum Required for Impacts to Jurisdictional Resources RCA Etiwanda Other RCA JurisdictionalPermanent Impacts Mitigation Mitigation Heights Preserve Mitigation Resource' within NA (acres) Ration Required (acres) (acres) Lands (acres) • • 71.22 1:1 71.22 46.57 -24.65 0.16 1:1 0.16 5.05 +4.89 71.38 -- 71.38 51.62 19.76 Notes: Modeling based on 4% annual chance (25-year) Floodplain with a minimum depth threshold of 0.2 feet. 2 Mitigation ratio subject to agency approval. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Jurisdictional Resource Impacts Rural/Conservation Area • There are an estimated 34 acres of jurisdictional resources regulated under ACOE, RWQCB, and/or CDFW on privately owned lands located within the RCA. ■ The exact location and amount of impacts on privately owned lands located within the RCA site is unknown . ■ Mitigation for impacts to jurisdictional resources on private properties located within the RCA would be implemented according to the mitigation ratios and measures determined through a separate review and approval by regulatory agencies. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Impacts to Special -Status Wildlife Species Neighborhood Area • Although low quality, impacts would occur to 658 acres of suitable habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat. ■ A total of 757. 53 acres of impacts to USFWS Critical Habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat would occur within the NA. ■ The compensatory mitigation ratio for San Bernardino kangaroo rat shall be 1 : 1, subject to approval by USFWS. • Impacts would also occur within suitable habitat for coastal California gnatcatcher. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Mitigation for Impacts to Special -Status Wildlife Species Neighborhood Area ■ Acquired lands within the RCA will include areas containing suitable habitat specifically for coastal California gnatcatcher and San Bernardino kangaroo rat. • Specifically, lands acquired within the RCA would provide approximately 658 acres of suitable habitat for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat as well as conservation of USFWS Critical Habitat for this species. • The Recommended Preserve would conserve approximately 550.67 acres of Critical Habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat, and there are approximately 833 acres of additional Critical Habitat for this species available for acquisition within the RCA. ■ Therefore, impacts within the NA can be fully mitigated through acquisition of lands designated as Critical Habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat within the RCA. RANCHO CUCAMONGA Impacts & Mitigation for Special -Status Plant Species Neighborhood Area ■ Direct impacts to CRPR 113. 1 and 113. 2 species would occur within the Neighborhood Area . ■ Impacts to these species can be reduced to less than significant through : • conservation of suitable habitat within the RCA Etiwanda Heights Preserve • acquisition of lands within the RCA • translocation of these species RANCHO CUCAMONGA Special-Status Species Impacts Rural/Conservation Area ■ It is unknown whether impacts within the RCA would occur to special-status species or to suitable habitat containing special- status species. • Significant impacts in the RCA would require mitigation . RANCHO CUCAMONGA Municipal Code Amendment DRC2018=00605 and Special Planning Area Amendments Regarding Regulations for Hotels Planning Commission Meeting April 24, 2019 Background • October 4, 2017 — CC adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 919 requiring a CUP for any new hotel or expansion of any existing hotel for a period of 45 days • November 15, 2017 — CC extended the urgency ordinance for an additional 10 months, 15 days • August 8, 2018 — PC discussed hotel regulations and provided direction to staff • September 19, 2018 — City Council extended the urgency ordinance for an additional 10 months, 15 days • March 19, 20191 April 8, 2019 — Focus group meeting with existing hotel owners/operators/Meeting with hotel developer • April 10, 2019 — Public Hearing at Planning Commission, continued to April 24, 2019 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Background • Currently no citywide regulations for hotels • Permitted or conditionally permitted in 6 zones as well as Haven Avenue Overlay ,. . : and Industrial Commercial Overlay Ait - • There has been increased interest for hotels in all categories over past 3 - years CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Background Development Code lacks provisions that would ensure excellence in architectural design An amendment to the hotel - development standards would help to encourage. o Better site design € g r Y o Better architecture o Use of higher quality building materials o Walkability RANCHOCITY OF CUCAMONGA Hotel Trends • Boom in development of Extended Stay format hotels • Encourage formulaic design • Limited on site amenities • Limited employment opportunities for hospitality professionals • Dual brand hotels • Two hotels on one site • Modest design amenities • creates under utilized sites CITY . RANCHO 1 t 1{F nt IL an a .T A'-Z,R d2 f^T T T_ e Search Address or ARN Q AK #+ # / o fi! 4sc� o t t 4N IT f f. y at IF t l 1 _ —111 d #s � � Almond St _ '� tee, ►+ w251K S. HXsidoH ltlde Rd Hlgtlde Rd tkiRd r +em n } F J I 4' v*sfdmet rkr t 1di 1 1 I WI!ren Aye Y j t`IM I{r � + *�� }. The augrtbt.d 95%. yfilygn Ave I � '. :. r t W 23rd S[ t CotMp hod ——y I 1 5 � � ^^ndSC X sanyao S[ Banyan S[ }t :emoetAve a Lemon Ave 411"agc0, Yinyt • PatnfAl a.Lemo Or __. .. .; .y:= - .� ':ves_ a.i =. _. -._:-�:�.q... - ar •.. - :` Alta Lama W } Y I ctot ASt Grapeland i Etiwarida: Map of [ u We Llne Rd a 01 fV Existing Hotels n ? a d' I #+ I 00 r t Rancho0 0 1 Cucamonga } Plew Ri■ o' hr ow Rte � s m • Primarily concentrated on the Nanh 3 whltt+apt Ave --� erns, Cucamanya 1 south side a` t � . A s @ n • Proximity to 1-15 and Ontario Y a dth5 International Airport � I 4 Y Y > Y K t � 2 c C 6 = On,. I-M11'&Pkwy Ya ley Biyd $C►iid A BIYd erg pr Slaver Ave 4 Ail�Ori L1- E A�� � tate SI —1 K Y 1 ;�.�• l rrl! K Esti,DASA.HGA,USGS.FEMA I City of Rancho Cucamonga,Esrl,HER Existing Hotels 11 hotels operating in the City and 2 w/ current entitlements HOTEL NAME ADDRESS DESCRIPTION ROOMS Holiday Inn Express & Suites 9589 Milliken Avenue Business/Leisure 93 Residence Inn by Marriott 9299 Haven Avenue Extended Stay 126 Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott 9550 Pittsburgh Avenue BusinesslLeisure 108 TownePlace Suites by Marriott 9625 Milliken Avenue Extended Stay 112 Homewood Suites by Hilton 11433 Mission Vista Drive Extended Stay 103 Hilton Garden Inn 11481 Mission Vista Drive Business/Leisure 122 Courtyard by Marriott 11525 Mission Vista Drive Business/Leisure 117 Aloft 10480 Fourth Street Business/Leisure 136 Best Western Plus Heritage Inn 8179 Spruce Avenue Business/Leisure 116 Four Points by Sheraton 11960 E Foothill Blvd Business/Leisure 118 New Kansan Motel 9300 E Foothill Blvd Budget 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA a2�Lr t .L A ra11-abl 6r utur 4kot N4, _ t:. _ _ L _.--.w.—._—.' ..�i....—..rX_+rpt} 1.��� i....-i...w.T�.*.�ZI 1•—ti+t.—.�.r.�._ _•�.r.r.r.—•�.r.—...�—.�..r.rF.v� �" .. FIV t ` J : t t Q : � � l G f1lil;tdeRd HIIWdVRd "UrpIfL�Rd i t � 1 Charfey College ' School t � Dapyan$r 8an}'4n R rtF S-t -Catch �• Basfn .44 i fid 1:4mQa'�„"r'* � ,,.. �,_ '>� G � �•� ,o Ate i-omat7r _. y rid' ve •' - 21D - - •+ - -- — v --' - . _ . �• •�. �? NO Loma ` �• Grapeland A. Etlwanp• o. OA, M4 Upland Hiils 1•�? �:+ a' ='r AM.,A",h`rraal :e •������.; • Rao ' Tn£ 1 Fr Country Club !74 �. k ■■ /f u m yn MVV ILIL T ( II ill>F��3iMilli11111 Rancho -a �! an r Cuc onga � and E rktTOW'W y ��r AIow Ito Etj Air RtF r E 90'F1 InI1 Notes, privy ptvd t,,, ., Kaiser -------------- �rY` Cucam a 1 64ttiSG Parcels �� WS E= 1 0 0,5 1 2 '- N City Boundary .--_-_---_-�4_-_. , 4th. ._-_-_---4�., ......t�, �- -- - 1 inch equals 5,280 Feet Analysis • EDSP, 2015 • Job Diversification Economic Development Strategic Plan • Attractive environment for City of Rancho Cucamonga Millennials Final[keit February 2015 • Infill development • Lack of redevelopment tools ANclio • Hospitality priorities CL CANIONGA. pwwwror City of Rancho Cucamonga • Attract full service/boutique hotels •t .44 V +S+ • Raise lodging offerings supporting office based industries RANCHOCITY OF a Analysis is 2018 City Council Goal: "ENHANCING PREMIER COMMUNITY STATUS — As the community matures, undertake programs and projects to enhance Rancho Cucamonga's position as the premier community in our region. " • Code amendment would allow for more discretionary review of hotels, ensure higher quality design, and impose minimum amenity requirements • New regulations would also protect the financial health and vibrancy of the local hotel industry and the fiscal health of the City • Promote walkability and reinforce sustainability Summary of Proposed Regulations • Recommending a new Chapter 17.93 be added to Development Code to implement operational standards and application requirements for development of new hotels • Special planning areas would also be amended, including: o Empire Lakes Specific Plan o Etiwanda Specific Plan o Town Square Master Plan o Victoria Arbors Master Plan o Victoria Community Plan Amendment • Haven Avenue Overlay District and the Industrial Commercial Overlay District CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Summary of Proposed Regulations • Extended Stay Hotels: • New extended stay hotels would not be permitted since this category of hotels is satisfactorily represented in the City • Focus will be on attracting higher end and boutique hotels to capture that segment of the hotel market • Existing Extended Stay Hotels that conform to all other applicable development standards would be considered a nonconforming use and could continue in operation Summary of Proposed Regulations • Conditional Use Permit: • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) will be required for all new hotels or expansions to existing hotels • Will provide the City with discretionary review ability to consider each hotel development on a case-by-case basis and apply specific conditions to ensure land use compatibility with the surrounding area • Market Feasibility Study: • Market feasibility study would need to be prepared as part of the application review process • Study would determine the condition of the hotel/lodging market and its ability to support a new hotel -- Is the development financially feasible? Summary of Proposed Regulations • Findings: • Findings specific to hotel uses would be required to support the CUP • Including a finding that the proposed hotel is not expected to reduce the total hotel occupancy rate in the City below 75% in the first 5 years of operations • Occupancy: • Defined minimum (one day) and maximum (30 days) stay requirements Summary of Proposed Regulations • Public Safety Standards: • To help ensure public safety and mitigate against criminal activity the following would be required for hotels: o Management plan for addressing potential criminal activities at the site o Installation of security cameras/ storage of 30 days of recordings o Training for hotel staff on how to spot criminal activity o Single point of contact for Fire and Police to address issues at the hotel CITY OF • . t Summary of Proposed Regulations • Hotel Amenities: • Defined amenities would be required for new hotels as part of the effort to broaden the types of hotels within the City: o full-service restaurants . . .{ o outdoor bars/ lounges and dining areas o fitness centers w/ wide range of equipment " o spas o large pools o fire pits F III III!!!III,,, 111111111ol o other recreation areas o valet parking 0 0! CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Summary of Proposed Regulations • Design Standards: • Hotels would be held to a higher standard of architectural design review than they had been previously • Development standards and design guidelines specific to hotel development, including: o Requiring hotels be integrated into a larger pattern of development and avoid being isolated from restaurants and entertainment o Requiring designs that are unique and tailored to a specific site o Requiring building architecture that incorporates multiple design elements and variation in materials and colors CITY OF RANCHO t a Options Options the Commission Could Consider: • Modifying the minimum occupancy rate from 75% to 72%. • Permit Extended Stay Hotels in all zones where Hotels are permitted. • Broaden the minimum required amenities to include services associated with afull-service hotel Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 19-34 recommending the City Council approve: • Municipal Code Amendment DRC2018-00605 • Empire Lakes Specific Plan Amendment DRC2019-00230 • Etiwanda Specific Plan Amendment DRC2019-00230 • Town Square Master Plan Amendment DRC2019-00231 • Victoria Arbors Master Plan Amendment DRC2019-00231 • Victoria Community Plan Amendment DRC2019-00232 All amending the requirements and standards for the development of new hotels or expansions to existing hotels within the City and plan areas. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ONTARiO** Lodging Data & CAL IFORN 1A Recap Report CONVENTION & VISITORS for • of 1 • Greater Ontario Hoteliers, GOCVB is pleased to exclusively present Ontario and Rancho Cucamonga lodging data and trends for the reporting month of March 2019. Last month, Ontario hotels had the highest growth in ADR, declined in occupancy, and increased in RevPAR year-over-year. Ontario economy hotels increased in occupancy, RevPAR, and ADR year-aver-year. Full-service declined in occupancy,yet increased in ADR and RevPAR.Rancho hotels declined in occupancy, RevPAR,and ADR. Year-over-Year: March F -- - - %Change So.Cal Occupancy March over last year YTD Riverside-San Bernardino 78.3% 0.8 71.7% • Ontario Occupancy:72.2%,down-2.5%YOY,with Anaheim-Santa Ana 82.4% 2.9 75.7% Full Service Hotels down-6.7% Los Angeles-Long Beach 81.8% -0.2 77.5% • Rancho Occupancy:80.0%,down-1.4%YOY %Change So.Cal ADR March over last year YTD • Ontario ADR:$114.06,up 8.1%with Full-Service Riverside-San Bernardino $151.13 1.9 $135.31 Hotels up 10.2%YOY and Economy up 11.4%YOY Anaheim-Santa Ana $170.78 1.9 $151.23 Los Angeles-Long Beach $175.22 -2.6 $176.22 • Rancho ADR:$146.39 down-1.8%YOY %Change • Ontario RevPAR:$82.37,up 5.4%with Economy So.Cal RevPAR March over last year YTD Hotels leading up 11.5%YOY Riverside-San Bernardino $118.35 2.7 $97.02 Anaheim-Santa Ana $140.18 4.8 $122.11 • Rancho RevPAR:$117.10,down-3.2%YOY Los Angeles-Long Beach 5743.26 -2.8 $136.65 ONTARIO •NTARIQ • ■ HotelFR Hotel RevPAR CLICAMONGaCUCAMONGA RevPAR � i � 1 • I i • 1 1 1 1 DECREASEINCREASE HYCREASE DECREASE OvER L,YEAR i • R YEAR Leading March Events WHAT'S HAPPENING NEXT • women's Conference-1,200 room nights(3/11) & ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE • EI Polio Loco Meeting-800 room nights(3/30) • Disney an Ice 4/24-4/28(58,000) MARCH #of Hotels Inventory/Day Roams Sold • SkillsLISA 52nd Leadership and Skill Ontario 48 5,444 219,126 Conference 4/25-4/28(3,000) Rancho 10 1,150 51,037 Long Beach 58 6,207 263,673 • Dance Competition 5/3 (5,000) Santa Ana 30 3,320 140,067 Burbank 19 2,684 124,944 • Mighty Men of Valor 5/7-5/10(5,000) Torrance 20 3,055 147,066 Costa Mesa 28 3,476 153,934 • Comic Con 5/18-5/19(3,000) Pasadena 28 3,148 131,054 a and Grade School Graduations r College Garden Grove 24 4,316 181,322 g 5/4, 5/20-5/23,5/28,5/29 (125,000) =n You KNOT... One powerful marketing strategy to boost hotel revenue is by using social media to advertise.To make the most of this tip,consider strategic content that showcases everything staying Greater Ontario has to offer.No time?-visit GOCVB's social media and repost whatever fits your needs. 2000 E.Corivertion Certpr Way,Ontario, CA 91764D1!