HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016/11/01 - Agenda Packet
T HE C ITY OF R ANCHO C UCAMONGA
DESIGNREVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 1, 2016-7:00 P.M.
Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center
RainsRoom
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, California
I.C ALL T O O RDER
Roll Call
Regular Members:Ray WimberlyRich Macias
Candyce BurnettDonald Granger
Alternates:Lou Munoz Rich Fletcher
Francisco Oaxaca
II.PUBLICCOMMENT
This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee.
State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously
included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the
matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are limited to five minutes per
individual.
III.PROJECTREVIEWITEMS
The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their
representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment
is limited to 20minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will
address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project
proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the
Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the
Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require
any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public
input.
1of 2
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 1, 2016
A.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-
00268-BRUCE KARISH -A request for site plan and architectural review
of athree (3) building industrial complex on 5.26 acres of land in the
General Industrial (GI) District, located at the northeast corner of 6th Street
and Center Avenue; APN: 0209-262-25. Related Files: Tentative Parcel
Map SUBTPM19683 and CEQA Review CEQA2016-00011.
B.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP
SUBTPM19683 -BRUCE KARISH -A request to subdivide a 5.26 acre
site into 3 parcels in the General Industrial (GI) District, located at the
northeast corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue APN: 0209-262-25.
Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00268 and CEQA Review
CEQA2016-00011.
IV.A DJOURNMENT
The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an
11:00p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with
the consent of the Committee.
I,Jennifer Palacios, Office Specialist II with the Planning Department for the City of
Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of theforegoing agenda
was posted on October 20,2016,atleast 72hours prior to the meeting per Government
Code Section 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.
2of2
DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS
7:00p.m.Tom GrahnNovember 1, 2016
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-00268 -BRUCE KARISH
-A request for site plan andarchitectural review of a three (3) building industrial complex on 5.26
acres of land inthe General Industrial (GI) District, located atthe northeast corner of 6th Street
and CenterAvenue; APN: 0209-262-25. Related Files: Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM19683and
CEQA Review CEQA2016-00011.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM19683-BRUCE
KARISH -A requestto subdivide a 5.26 acre site into 3 parcels in the General Industrial (GI)
District, located at the northeast corner of 6th Street and Center Avenue APN: 0209-262-25.
Related Files: Design Review DRC2016-00268 and CEQA Review CEQA2016-00011.
Design Parameters:The project site is a rectangular parcelof about 474feet (north-south) by
558feet (east-west), located at the northeast corner of 6thStreet and Center Avenue.The
property to the north and west are in the General Industrial (GI) District, and the property to the
east and south are in the Industrial Park (IP) District. To the north is an84,000 square foot
manufacturing building, to the south is an 830,000 square foot warehouse distribution building,to
the east is a193,000 square footwarehouse distribution building, and to the west is amulti-tenant
industrial complex. The site is vacant and vegetation is dominated by short grasses;there are no
shrubs or trees are on the project site.The subject property is generally level with an elevation
at the north and south sides of about 1,080 feet and 1,070feet, respectively.
The applicant proposes to construct threeindustrial buildings:two single tenant and one multi-
tenant buildings on three parcels. Parcel 1 is 3.35 acres and will contain Building 1, a four tenant
multi-tenant industrial building totaling 63,459 square feet. Parcel2is 0.92 acres and will contain
Building 2 totaling 17,709 square feet. Parcel 3 is 0.89 acres and will contain Building 3 totaling
13,708 square feet. The buildings are speculative at this time,but as typical for thesetypesof
buildings, asmall officeisincluded in each tenant space.A dock high door and trailer parking
space is provided for each building/tenant space. Building 1 provides 6 truck trailer parking
spaces, Buildings 2 and 3 each provide 1 truck trailer parking space for a total of 8 truck trailer
parking spaces on-site.Automobile parking is provided for each tenant space based on office,
manufacturing, and warehouse floor area. Building 1 will provide 88 parking spaces for the four
tenant spaces, Building 2 will provide 28 parking spaces, and Building 3 will provide 25 parking
spaces, for a combined total of 141 parking spaceson-site.
TheDevelopment Code requires a 35-foot building set back off of 6th Street and a 25-foot building
setback off of Center Avenue. At the building setback line, buildings are limited to a maximum
height of 35 feet. Buildings exceeding 35 feet in height are requiredto be set back an additional
1-foot from the front setback for each 1-foot of height up to a maximum building setback of 70
feet. The project is designed so that most of the buildings are 35 feet high, however, each of the
three buildings has a tower element incorporated into its design to differentiate the office floor
area from the manufacturing/warehouse floor area. The office area for Building 1 (Unit A),
Building 2, and Building 3 have the tower element setback an additional 3 feet behind the primary
building plane as the office area tower element increases in height to 38 feet.
The proposed buildingswill be of concrete tilt-up constructionpainted with a palette of four
different colorswith a secondary materialofglass panels.The building colors are incorporated
into geometric patterns and horizontal banding to break up large expanses of stucco. Glass is
generously incorporated into the tower element design toemphasize the importance of the office
area as the main entry of each tenant space.Each office entrance will also have a metal canopy.
ItemA-1
DRC COMMENTS
DRC2016-00268&TENTATIVE PARCELMAP SUBTPM19683–BRUCE KARISH
November 1, 2016
Page 2
Staff Comments:The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee
discussion.
Major Issues:The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion
regarding this project.
1.There are no major design issues. The applicant has worked closely with staff during the
screen check review process to address any design and site planning issues.
Secondary Issues:Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the
Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues.
1.All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes including transformers,fire department
connections, back-flow devices, etc. shall be surrounded by a minimum of two rows of
shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on-center.
2.Employee areas, each a minimum of 500 square feet, are provided on each parcel and
for each tenant space for a total of 6 throughout the project site. The employeeareas are
designed with a steel arbor with cross members that provide shading for these areas. The
arbor structures should either be painted white, or to match the primary building color.
3.All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black or similar dark color.
Policy Issues:The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be
incorporated into the project design without discussion.
1.Incorporate undulating berms along the streetfrontages, within the landscapesetback and
landscape areas. The highest part of the berms should be at least 3 feet in height.
2.Decorative paving shall be provided at the vehicular access pointsonto the site.
3.All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of
the adjacent wallor glasspanel.
4.Provide durable street furniture in the outdoor employee area, such as tables, chairs, and
waste receptacles.
Staff Recommendation:Staff recommends that the project be approved, subject to the
revisions above which can be verified by staff, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for
review and action.
Design Review Committee Action:
Staff Planner:Tom Grahn
Members Present:
ItemA-2