The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-05-24 - Supplemental AL FL 4. r _ Entry View From South i v0 I rrm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Project Description • Applicant: National Community Renaissance of California • Project Description: A request for review of a 140-unit affordable development • Project Size: 4 acres of land site plan and architectural rental senior housing • General Plan Designation: Low Medium • Zoning: Low Medium (LM) District • Density : 35 dwelling units per acre Entitlements • General Plan Amendment — DRC2016-00964 • Density Bonus Agreement — DRC2017-00156 • Design Review — DRC2016-00814 • Certificate of Appropriateness - DRC2016-00966 • Variance — DRC2017-00032 • Tree Removal Permit — DRC2016-00965 VDNOWVDnD OHDNVU JO AilD A �. - -- _ JL `�N-r ,_� •'J `�.� r .`Aim' w_�y . r ------ --- ---- - - DAY CREEK CHANNEL THE -UF E - nuo N Project Overview • 140 units on 3 floors built around center courtyard • Craftsman architectural design theme • 131 one bedroom units - 617 to 701 square feet 9 two bedroom units — 894 square feet • 119 parking stalls, 82 in carport stalls and 37 in uncovered stalls • Pedestrian connection to Pacific Electric Trail and commercial center under construction to the south 0 a z O 2 a u u O 2 u z 9 LL O V Zoning/Density • Zoning — Low Medium (LM) District (4-8 Dwelling Units per Acre) • Victoria Community Plan (VCP) permits zoning designation to be increased 2 density ranges to provide plan flexibility • VCP provides an incentive to construct affordable housing of a 1 unit increase in density for each affordable unit provided • The project is 100 percent affordable • Density may be increased to 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre • Proposed density is 35 dwelling units per acre Affordability • Units are for Seniors 55 years and older • Must stay affordable for 55 Years • Owned and operated by National Community Renaissance of California who operate 833 rental units in the City Number of Units Offered Maximum eligible income Maximum monthly rent 15 $15,600 $359 49 $23,400 $539 43 $26,000 $599 32 $31,200 $719 Code Compliance/Concessions • Project complies with all Code requirements except number of required parking spaces, size of the privat and the necessity for a Variance for wall height for the e decks • Development Code permits affordable housing projects up to 3 concessions • Applicant is requesting 2 concessions — parking and deck size • Reduction in parking from 149 to 119 parking spaces • Reduction in deck size from 100 to 81 square feet for upper units and 150 to 107 square feet for ground floor units • Variance to increase property line wall height from permitted 6 feet to up to 9 feet it. �o rrm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Wt " View From�k' r-r -�r- r r if , li ir- m rrm CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ,p South Elevation North Elevation East Elevation V7- West Elevation IJ- e I-Tu-nm "k Recreational Amenities • Pool and spa • BBQ facilities • Fire Pit • Multiple fireplaces • Lounge area • Community room • Multi -purpose room • Warming area • Technology areas IIL ft vol sip IL t } 4 .. , .. A a k w- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tree • Canyon Live Oak tree located at southeast corner of site • Granted Historic Landmark Designation on October 21, 1987 • Believed at the time to be largest oak tree in the city • Tree has since declined in for removal health and is recommended • Certificate of Appropriateness required to determine whether removal of Historic Landmark is appropriate • General Plan Amendment required to modify General Plan Figure LU-8 • Tree Removal Permit required to remove subject tree Ny,: - AN 1' T- CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CDFW Comments CDFW Concerns: CDFW raised concerns that the Initial Study (IS) identified several special -status wildlife and plant species with potential to occur on the project site. The study, though, concluded there was a low likelihood for these species to occur. CDFW stated that focused studies for special -status wildlife and plant species should have been performed to verify LSA Is conclusion. LSA Response: LSA maintains that the habitat on site is of low value for the subject plant and animal species due to: 1. The small size of the project site (4 acres). 2. The site being disturbed due to previous onsite activities. 3. The site being isolated as a result of extensive surrounding development. CDFW Comments (cont.) LSA Site Reevaluation: LSA reevaluated the project site on May 12, 2017, and did not find any special -status wildlife or plant species and determined that there was a low likelihood that they would occur on the site. LSA Conclusion: Although a few sensitive plant and animal species may occur on the site, the project site would not support their long term existence due to habitat degradation and surrounding development. LSA finds that the potential impacts to sensitive plant and animal species and their habitats is not considered significant under CEQA. Staff Response to Comments • Staff reviewed LSA's responses to the issues raised by CDFW and LSA's conclusion that the impacts to special status animal species and their habitat are not considered significant under CEQA. • Based on this finding, staff concludes that the original determination made in the Initial Study, which was circulated on April 3, 2017, is adequate and that no changes or additional mitigation measures are necessary to address the issues raised by CDFW. • CEQA Section 15073.5 states that recirculation of the Initial Study is not required when new information is added to the mitigated negative declaration which merely clarified, amplifies or makes insignificant modifications to the negative declaration. .�;;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA • Conclusion Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions: • Recommend the City Council adopt the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts. • Recommend the City Council approve General Plan Amendment DRC2016-00964 and Density Bonus Agreement DRC2017-00156. • Approve Design Review DRC2016-00814, Variance DRC2017-00032 and Tree Removal Permit DRC2016- 00965. • Recommend that the Historic Preservation Commission approve Certificate of Appropriateness DRC2016-00966 Planning Commission May 24, 2017 • Design Review DRC2016-00417 — A review of the a proposal to construct a 4,250 square foot office building on one developed parcel; • Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-01036— A review of a Uniform Sign Program for a 4,250 square foot office building on one developed parcel. .Z.�;. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -D(Z(2oIl - C)o Y/7 Review Timeline • Planning Commission Workshop: March 9, 2016 • Initial Submittal: May 17, 2016 • Completeness Determination: March 28, 2017 • Committees Review: May 2, 2017 • Planning Commission: May 24, 2017 The area of the project site is .37 acres S Commercial Retail Center ' > oothill Boul M _7 T `A: > `y Foothill Boulevard :116miL Community Commercial District - Aerial Overview J1 9 AL AV W iW Design Review DRC2016-00417 • The applicant proposes to construct a story office building with a floor approximately 4,250 square feet. • Parcel is approximately .37 acres • 4 tenant spaces are proposed one, 2- area of � g 0) annany a�nj�ejey� Design Review DRC2016-00417 (Continued) • Wood frame construction painted with a palette of two colors and finished with stucco. • Added materials include matte metal wall panels, corrugated metal, and glazing. • Roof line varies and a tower element is proposed on the north side of the building. • Details include: metal storefront door frames, metal awnings, metal parapet caps, and metal hardware. • Second floor facing Foothill Boulevard is recessed creating a small deck. .�� CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA I IIIIIIIIIIII \ � �,,�'plzil��l � ��ii�llli�ll�il III` � I' Floor Plan Second Fl" Plan Landscape Plan _M1 Uniform Sign Program • The Uniform Sign Program was reviewed by staff and meets all current Development Code requirements and guidelines. • The four tenants will be allowed two non -illuminated wall signs each on the north, west or east elevations. • No monument signs are proposed. Environmental Assessment • The applicant submitted environmental including an air quality and noise study; studies • Staff reviewed the studies and concluded that there would not be any significant effect on the environment; • Pursuant staff has Exempt Projects). to the California Environmental Quality Act, determined that the project is Categorically under Section 15332 (In -Fill Development Public Notification • The item was hearing and no Staff in response duly advertised as a public comments were received by to the public notifications. Conclusion Staff Recommends Approval of: • Design Review DRC2016-00417 • Uniform Sign Program DRC2016-01036 through the adoption of the Resolutions of Approval. '•'•• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Creative Placemaking and Public Art Wca0►7- 60137 Purpose Cultural Development • Focus on enhancing Community enviromentfor Asset -based Development cultural expression orientation • Focus on improving • Focus on quality of life developing local assests Economic Place -based Development Creative orientation • Focus on enhancing Placemaking • Focus on the standard of onnections, not just living :2objects "'•• CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA l At } CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Purpose BEFORE Purpose Qualifying Projects Residential Projects • Projects of 4 or more dwelling units • Density of 4du/acre or more Commercial, Office, and Industrial Projects • New development with building valuation over $170001000 • Exterior remodels with building valuation over $110001000 Determining the Art Value • Residential • $750 per unit • Commercial, Industrial & Office • $1 per square foot • Mixed use projects will be valued based on the use Art Options • Install art within the development (Preferred Option) • Donate artwork to the City to be installed on public property • Pay an in -lieu fee into the City's Public Art Trust Fund Review and Installation • Development Review for art installed within a development • Same review process as the entire entitlement • No additional reviews required • Art is part of the proposed project • Consideration for phased developments • Conditions of Approval • Bonds or other surety to ensure completion •;;:,•. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Iconographic Art CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �a. a 'P ^ .19 .1 r.' 4 y i V 1 4 L CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Functional w 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA .1 wit CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA w � _ r -.,A Aw CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Public Art Committee • Form an Art in Public Places Committee • 1 Members of the Planning Commission • 1 Member of Parks and Recreation Commission • 1 Member of Community Arts Foundation • 2 Members of the Public • Goals of the Committee • Selection, placement & maintenance of art of City Property • Expenditures from the City's Public Art Trust Fund CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Environmental Review • Exempt from CEQA • General Rule 15061(B)(3) • No physical change to the environment • Revision to existing land use regulation to require a rt Recommendation • Recommend to the City Council approval of Municipal Code Amendment DRC2017-00177 • Final action to be taken by City Council ®South coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 - www.agmd.gov SENT VIA USPS AND E-MAIL: domi n ick.perezOc itvo fre.us Dominick Perez, Assistant Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CITY OFRANCHO CUCM May 24, 2017 MAY 14 1017 RECEIVED - pIANNNG Mitieated Neeative Declaration (MND) for the Pronosed Desian Review DRC2016-00670, Specific Plan Amendment DRC2016-00931 The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above -mentioned document. The following comments are meant as guidance for the Lead Agency and should be incorporated into the Final MND. Proiect Description The Lead Agency proposes to construct and operate a 232,058-square-foot, high -cube warehouse with unknown occupants on an approximately 11.84-acre site ("project"). The project is bounded by commercial uses to the north and east, residential dwellings to the south, and a vacant commercial lot to the west. The residential dwellings are within '''A mile of the project. Air Quality and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Analyses The MND estimates approximately 396 total vehicle trips, including approximately 151 daily diesel truck trips. In the Air Quality Section, the Lead Agency quantified the proposed project's construction and operation air quality impacts and compared those impacts with SCAQMD's regional and localized air quality CEQA significance thresholds. The Lead Agency found that regional and localized construction and operational emissions would be less than significant. Additionally, the Lead Agency performed an HRA and found that "all offshe diesel emissions concentrations were [... j below the 10.0 in a million cancer risk threshold (...) for all age groups examined" (see Page Rev 3-1-16 of the MND). SCAQMD staff has concerns about the health risk analysis in the MND. The HRA analysis performed for this project was based on improper assumptions which has likely underestimated the project's health risk impacts. Additionally, SCAQMD staff finds that the MND is not clear with respect to meteorological data that was used in the air quality analysis. Details are included in the attachment. The attachment also includes a list of recommended mitigation measures which the Lead Agency should implement and include in the Final MND, if the revised health risks from the project are found to be significant. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15074, prior to approving the project, the Lead Agency shall consider the MND for adoption together with any comments received during the public review process. Please provide SCAQMD staff with written responses to all comments contained herein prior to the adoption of the Final MND. SCAQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to address the issues raised in the letter and any other air quality and HRA �10-leI�Z-- Dominick Perez 2 May 24, 2017 questions that may arise. Please contact Jack Cheng, Air Quality Specialist — CEQA IGR Section, at (909) 396-2448, if you have any questions regarding these comments. Sincerely, .Ce#a Scut Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources Attachment J W :LS:1C SBC170425-07 Control Number Dominick Perez ATTACHMENT May 24, 2017 Air Ouality and Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Analyses 1. SCAQMD staff is concerned that the Health Risk Assessment (HRA) has likely underestimated the cancer risk from the project. In the HRA, the Lead Agency used the AERMOD dispersion model to estimate DPM concentrations from the diesel vehicles generated by the project and used the 2015 revised OEHHA guidelines to estimate the health risks to sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency revise the HRA based on the following comments. a. In the HRA, the Lead Agency used a 70-year average DPM emissions rate for the 30 years of exposure to estimate health risks. This is not an appropriate methodology to estimate emissions based on the 2015 revised OEHHA guidelines. The 2015 revised OE14HA guidelines acknowledge that children are more susceptible to the exposures to air toxics and have revised the way cancer risks are estimated to take this into account. Since the emissions from the project -generated trucks get cleaner with time due to existing regulations, it would not be appropriate to average out the emissions over a 70-year exposure duration since this would underestimate the health risks to children who would be exposed to higher DPM concentrations during the early years of project operation. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the DPM emissions for each year of operation be applied to each of the corresponding age bins (i.e. emissions from Year l of project operation should be used to estimate cancer risks to the third trimester to 0 year age bin; Year 1 and 2 of project operation should be used to estimate the cancer risks to the 0 to 2 years age bins; and so on). b. Dock loading idling emissions were modeled as individual point sources at four idling locations along the planned loading docks (STCKI — 4). SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency revise the HRA using a line volume source that spans the entire dock area to ensure that impacts are properly analyzed. c. Some of the receptors were placed within the volume source exclusion zone, and the results at these locations might not be accurate. This has likely caused the risk results for these receptors not be captured. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency revise the HRA by using a greater number of smaller volume sources to avoid receptors within the volume source exclusion zone. d. The Lead Agency performed the HRA modeling on July 17, 2016 using EMFAC2011 to calculate emission factors. EMFAC2014 is the most recent available version (approved on December 30, 2014t) and was available at the time of analysis. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use EMFAC2014 when revising the HRA. EMFAC2014. Available at: httr)s://www.arb.ca.eov/emfac/2014/. Dominick Perez 4 May 24, 2017 2. Based on a review of Section 8.3.3 Meteorological Data of the Air Quality Study, three different air monitoring stations were discussed. However, it is unclear which air monitoring station or stations provided meteorological data. Therefore, SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency clarify which station or stations were used in the Final MND. Siting Warehouses near Residences 3. Based on the project description, the nearest sensitive receptors are approximately 1.4 mile to the south of the project. While SCAQMD staff recognizes that there are many factors Lead Agencies must consider when making local planning and land use decisions, there are concerns about the proximity of a warehouse to the existing residences and the potential long-term air quality impacts to the people living near the warehouse and along the truck routes as a result of increased truck activities. SCAQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency use the California Air Resources Board's (CARB) Air Quality and Land Use Handbook as a general reference guide for evaluating and reducing air pollution impacts associated with new projects that go through the land -use decision making process. In CARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, CARB recommends a buffer of at least 1,000 feet between land uses that will have 100 or more trucks per day2. 4. CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized during project construction and operation to minimize or eliminate these impacts. in the event that the Lead Agency, after revising the HRA analysis based on the comments provided above, finds that the project would result in significant health risk impacts, SCAQMD staff recommends incorporating the following on -road mobile -source truck related mitigation measures in the Final MND, in addition to the mitigation measures 1) through 24). For more information on potential mitigation measures as guidance to the Lead Agency, please visit SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook website3. • Require the use of 2010 compliant diesel trucks, or alternatively fueled, delivery trucks (e.g., food, retail and vendor supply delivery trucks) at commercial/retail sites upon project build -out. In the event that that 2010 model year or newer diesel trucks cannot be obtained, provide documentation as information becomes available and use trucks that meet EPA 2007 model year NOx emissions requirements'. Additionally, consider other measures such as incentives, phase -in schedules for clean trucks, etc. • Have truck routes clearly marked with trailblazer signs, so that trucks will not enter residential areas. • Limit activities to the amounts analyzed in the MD. 2 CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: httv:Hwww.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pd Guidance is for siting new sensitive land uses within 1,000 feet of a distribution center, Page 4. The buffer is a neutral mitigation measure provided to minimize truck activity emission impacts to sensitive receptors. Additionally, in April 2017, ARB published a technical advisory, Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near Nigh -Volume Roadways: Technical Advisory, to supplement ARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. This Technical Advisory is intended to provide information on strategies to reduce exposures to traffic emissions new high -volume roadways to assist land use planning and decision -making in order to protect public health and promote equity and environmental justice. Available at: httos:H/ .arb.ca.gov/ch/lmduse.htm r South Coast Air Quality Management District. hny:H/ .aQmd.izov/home/regulations/cecialair-quality-analysis-handbook. 4 Based on a review of the California Air Resources Board's diesel truck regulations, 2010 model year diesel haul trucks should have already been available and can be obtained in a successful manner for the project construction California Air Resources Board. March 2016. Available at: httn://% w truckload.ora/tca/files/ceLibraryFiles/Filename/000000003422/California-Clean- Truck-and-Trailer-Uodale.odf(See slide #23). Dominick Perez May 24, 2017 Promote clean truck incentive programs (see the discussion above regarding Cleaner Operating Truck Incentive Programs). Provide electric vehicle (EV) Charging Stations (see the discussion below regarding EV charging stations). 5. In addition to the mobile source mitigation measures identified above, the Lead Agency should incorporate the following onsite area source mitigation measures below as guidance to further reduce the project's operational air quality impacts. • Maximize use of solar energy including solar panels; installing the maximum possible number of solar energy arrays on the building roofs and/or on the project site to generate solar energy for the facility. • Maximize the planting of trees in landscaping and parking lots. • Use light colored paving and roofing materials. • Utilize only Energy Star heating, cooling, and lighting devices, and appliances. • Install light colored "cool" roofs and cool pavements. • Limit the use of outdoor lighting to only that needed for safety and security purposes. • Require use of electric or alternatively fueled sweepers with HEPA filters. • Use of water -based or low VOC cleaning products. Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 5. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 6. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. www.CityofRC. us Printetl: 4/26/2017 7 f Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planninq Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 8. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 9. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department, 10. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 11. The applicant shall comply with all Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Board and Federal EPA water requirements. 12. The applicant shall contact the U.S. Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of mailboxes. Multi -family residential developments shall provide a solid overhead structure for mailboxes with adequate lighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the overhead structure shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits, 13. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 14. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 15. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 16. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. 17. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 18. A Uniform Sign Program for this development shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. 19. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. www.CityofRc.us Printed : 426/2017 Page 2 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein and the Development Code regulations. 22. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 23. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 24. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 25.Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 26. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 27. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 28. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all Conditions of Approval shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed: 4/26/2017 w .CityofRC.us Page 3 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Development impact fees will be due prior to issuance of a building permit. Impact Fees include: Transportation Police Note: 1. A credit will be given for the current use 2. Fees are subject to change annually 3. Drainage impact fees already paid with the existing building. 2. Foothill Boulevard frontage improvements to be in accordance with City "Major Divided Arterial" standards including: A. Protect or repair existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. B. Remove existing drive approaches and replace with curb and gutter. C. Reconstruct access ramp on the southeast corner of Malachite Avenue at Foothill Boulevard. All improvements including access ramps shall be in accordance with the latest ADA standards. Revise striping for pedestrian path of travel for reconstructed access ramp. 3. Malachite Avenue frontage improvements to be in accordance with City 'Collector" standards and including: A. Remove and replace existing curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping as required. B. Dedicate right-of-way for Malachite and remove and reconstruct improvements to City "Collector" standards. 4. Amount of parking spaces to be in accordance with Development Code Section 17.64. Standard Conditions of Approval 5. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 total feet on Malachite Avenue 60 total feet on Foothill Avenue 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit and related administrative fees shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Permits issued on or after June 2, 2014, must complete the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the deposit will be forfeited. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit reimbursement: a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. w .CityofRC.us Printed. 4/2612017 Page 4 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 9. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 10. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 11. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Median Island Bike Trail Other Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 12. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. Printed 412612017 www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enlaineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 13. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch galvanized steel with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per City Standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage Flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/26/2017 page 6 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Enaineerina Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14.Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 15. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. Buildina and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Site Development Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations and energy calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes. an additional staircase appears to be required to satisfy the maximum travel distance from the second floor an Elevator may be required based on the proposed use of the second floor. The architect must justify the design in accordance with current building codes at the time of plan check submittal. The new structure is not required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers, but a lack of fire sprinklers may limit the use of the building. A soils report is required for new structures. Disabled access improvements must be made in accordance with current regulations. www.CityofRC.us Pnntetl: 4/262017 Page 7 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 3. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 5. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 6. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 7. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. www.CiryofRC.us Pnntetl: 4/26/2017 Page 8 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout 'Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Malachite Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. Printed: 4/26/2017 www.CltyofRC.us Page 9 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 23. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. Roof water is not permitted to flow over the public parkway and shall be directed to an under parkway culvert per City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements prior to issuance of a grading permit. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 27. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 28. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 29. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official. 30. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 31. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. v .CityofRC.us Printed 426/2017 Page 10 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 33. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 34. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. ~.CityofRC.us Printed 4/26/2017 Page 11 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 40. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. 41. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.10 (Grading and paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how site grading or a drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering buildings. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. vMnv.CityofRC.us Printed. 4/26/2017 Page 12 of 13 Project #: DRC2016-00417 Project Name: FOOTHILL TERRACE Location: 9533 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020826114-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. NONRESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 5.106.1 (Storm water pollution prevention) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Newly construction projects and additions which disturb less than one acre of land shall prevent the pollution of stormwater runoff from the construction activities through one or more of the following measures: 1.106.1.1 Local Ordinance — Comply with a lawfully enacted stormwater management and/or erosion control ordinance. 1.106.1.2 Best Management Practices (BMP) — Prevent the loss of soil through wind or water erosion by implementing an effective combination of erosion and sediment control and good housekeeping BMP. 1. Soil loss BMP that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Scheduling construction activity. b. Preservation of natural features, vegetation and soil. c. Drainage swales or lined ditches to control stormwater flow. d. Mulching or hydroseeding to stabilize disturbed soils. e. Erosion control to protect slopes. f. Protection of storm drain inlets (gravel bags or catch basin inserts). g. Perimeter sediment control (perimeter silt fence, fiber rolls). h. Sediment trap or sediment basin to retain sediment on site. i. Stabilized construction exits. j. Wind erosion control. k. Other soil loss BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency. 2. Good housekeeping BMP to manage construction equipment, materials and wastes that should be considered for implementation as appropriate for each project include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Material handling and waste management. b. Building materials stockpile management. c. Management of washout areas (concrete, paints, stucco, etc.). d. Control of vehicle/equipment fueling to contractors staging area. e. Vehicle and equipment cleaning performed off site. f. Spill prevention and control. g. Other housekeeping BMP acceptable to the enforcing agency (City of Rancho Cucamonga). �wwi.CityofRC.us Printed: 4/26/2017 Page 13 of 13 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 24, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Candyce Burnett, City Planner INITIATED BY: Dat Tran, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: TIME EXTENSION DRC2017-00238 — WESTERN STATES DEVELOPMENT, INC. - A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 11 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT17769) on 2.98 acres of land in the Low Residential (L) District (2-4 dwelling units per acre), located at the southwest corner of Beryl Street and 19th Street — APN: 0202-461-62,-63, and -65. On June 11, 2008, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17769 under Resolution 08-29. Staff finds the project to be within the scope of the prior Mitigated Negative Declaration. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. CONTINUANCE REQUESTED RECOMMENDATION: Due to an error in the public noticing process, staff recommends the Planning Commission continue the public hearing for Time Extension DRC2017-00238 to the jURe 14,20" meeting an unspecified date. CB:TG/Is is BLUM COLLINS LLP May 22, 2017 Dominick Perez, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 dominick.perez(alcitvofrc.us Via Finail & U.S. Mail Ann Center 707 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 4880 Los Angeles. California 90017 213.572.0400 phone 21M72.0401 fax CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGa MAY 11 1017 RECEIVED - PLANNING Re: California Environmental QaaliI3, Act Comments on Ora and Utica Miligated Negative Declaration Dear Mr. Perez and the City of Rancho Cucamonga: On behalf of the Golden State Environmental & Social Justice Alliance, a California Social Purpose Corporation, Entity #C4017878, this is to comment under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") upon the Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") for the above -captioned proposed distribution center for the lot at the northeast corner of 4" Street and Utica Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("the Project"). The Project is a 232,058-square-foot warehouse logistics building containing 26,500 square feet of office space and 205,358 square feet dedicated to the warehousing use on a property comprising five (5) parcels with a combined area of 515,690 square feet (11.84 acres) which contains an abandoned parking lot and a vacant pad within Planning Area 5 of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan at. Our comments appear in the order in which matters appear in the MND, and are supplemented by the comments of Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise ("S WAPE"), submitted herewith. The California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") "whenever it considers approval of a proposed project that `may have a significant effect on the environment."' Quail Botanical Gardens Found, Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal. App. 4th 1597, 1601, quoting Pub. Resources Code § 21100. As you also know, CEQA requires the preparation of an EIR "whenever it can be fairly argued on the basis of substantial evidence that the project may have significant environmental impact." No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal. 3d 68, 75 (emphasis added); see also Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of Califm•nia (1993) 6 Cal. 4th 1112, 1123. There is a fair argument that the Project may have a significant impact on air quality, biological resources, and greenhouse gases. Dominick Perez, City of Rancho Cucamonga May 22, 2017 Page 2 Air Ouality Our comments are supplemented by those of SWAPE, submitted herewith, which are incorporated by reference and which should be responded to during the City's process on the MND. See Attachment A (including letter from SWAPE with CaIEEMod and AERSCREEN output files). Subtopic b. Would the Project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? As you note, the South Coast Air Basin is non -attainment for ozone, PM10 and PM2.5. Construction Emissions. The MND concedes that cumulative impacts from construction emissions will be significant as to N%, ozone and both PM10 and PM2.5, but these impacts will be reduced to less than significant levels based on implementing certain mitigation measures. There is no substantial evidence these mitigation measures will reduce impacts to less than significant levels. In particular, we note that regarding these measures, there is no substantial evidence that emissions will be reduced to less than significant levels: 6. All construction equipment will be maintained in good operating condition: There is no requirement for Tier 4 or even Tier 2 construction equipment here. There is no substantial evidence this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels. 7. Construction contractors must show that they're using low -emission equipment or that doing so isn't feasible: What assumptions did RK Engineering use in its air quality and HRA modeling regarding this equipment? Again, there is not even a Tier 2 requirement here, there are no standards for what is "feasible," and there is no substantial evidence this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels. 8. Construction contractors shall use electric or clean fuel equipment "where feasible. " See our comment above regarding feasibility. There is no evidence this measure as drafted or implemented will reduce emissions to less than significant levels. 9. Construction crews shall, according to a statement in the construction grading plans, shut off equipment when not in use: A statement in the construction grading plans is not enforceable by the City, and there is no evidence this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels. 10. All asphalt must meet the performance standards of South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD') Rule 1108: this is required anyway, and there is no evidence this measure will reduce emissions. 11. Paints and coatings shall meet the standards in SCAQMD Rule 1113, and shall be applied by hand or by high -volume, low-pressure spray. This would reduce VOCs. We don't see how it will reduce emissions of NOx, ozone, PM1o, or PM2.5. Dominick Perez, City of Rancho Cucamonga May 22, 2017 Page 3 Measures 12, 13 and 14 are also required anyway, and would only reduce PM to or possibly PM2.5 emissions, and there is no evidence they would do so even for these pollutants to a level of less than significant. Operational Emissions. You concede cumulative impacts from the buildout of the General Plan will be significant but that they are subject to a Statement of Overriding Considerations from the Final Program EIR ("FPEIR"), and that several measures will make cumulative impacts insignificant. This is not based on substantial evidence for the reasons discussed below: 15. Preferential parking for HOVs and shuttle services. There is no actual provision for how many preferential parking spaces are to be provided, if any. There is no substantial evidence this measure will reduce emissions. The bulk of the emissions from the Project will come from trucks, not cars, HOVs or shuttle services accessing the site. 16. Schedule truck deliveries during off-peak hours. There is no provision for how this is to happen, and it is doubtful that a distribution center will be able to limit truck deliveries to off-peak hours. Any conclusion this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels is not based on substantial evidence. 17. Improve thermal integrity of buildings. There is no concrete provision for the logistics center meeting any insulation standard here. Any conclusion this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels is not based on substantial evidence. 21. All industrial and commercial facilities shall post signs requiring that trucks shall not be left idling for prolonged periods (1. e., in excess of 10 minutes). This violates a California Air Resources Board ("CARB") rule, which prohibits idling for over five minutes. See 13 CCR § 2485. There is no substantial evidence this measure will reduce emissions to less than significant levels. Subtopic d. Would the Project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The answer, according to a properly done Health Risk Screening Assessment, is yes, as SWAPE's analysis shows. Therefore, an EIR with a full-blown Health Risk Assessment, using proper parameters and SCAQMD and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA") guidance, should be prepared. The MND is improper because there is a fair argument that the Project may have a significant impact on humans, which is relevant both for this subtopic as to Air Quality and as to subtopic c under CEQA's Mandatory Findings of Significance, "Does the Project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?" Dominick Perez, City of Rancho Cucamonga May 22, 2017 Page 4 Biological Resource Subtopic a. Would the Project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? The site contains Delhi sands, and is therefore potential habitat to the endangered Delhi Sands Flower -loving Fly. Your consultant has concluded that the fly would not be present because the area is covered by gravel and cement and the nearest fly was detected over 3 miles away. This is a fly. There are all sorts of reasons it may be present without having been detected. The entire area this fly covers is 40 square miles, and the Delhi sands formation is 97% destroyed. Any appearance of these sands, and covering over of them, is therefore significant. Regarding the burrowing owl, you did no protocol -level survey for them, so the fact that it was not detected is not dispositive. While your mitigation measures call for a survey according to the California Department of Fish & Wildlife ('CDFW') Staff Report, you do not provide for qualified biologists until owls are discovered onsite. Surveys during the non -breeding season are not adequate, and you have not provided for breeding season surveys. See Staff Report at 6, second paragraph (surveys during non -breeding season are"typically inconclusive.'' You also define the avian nesting season as lasting from February 1 to August 31, which isn't accurate according to CDFW, which considers it to run from January 1 (due to raptors) to September 1. See Attachment B hereto. Subtopic e. Will the Project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Your Arborist Report acknowledges there are 128 mature trees which will all be removed under the Project. Of these mature trees, 4 are heritage trees meaning they are 20 inches or greater in diameter at 4.5 feet. You propose to remove these trees, even though three are on the edge of the Project site. You say that as mitigation, each tree removed will be replaced with a tree of minimum 15-gallon size. Your approach violates the City Municipal Code in at least three ways. First, Municipal Code § 17.16.080.I requires that the Planning Director consider several factors in deciding whether to allow removal of over 5 trees. Among those factors are (iii) the number of trees existing in the neighborhood and the impact of removal on the existing character of the area and property values, and (vi) whether the trees constitute a significant natural resource of the City. Subsection J then requires the Planning Director to make the finding that "For a development project every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is I The CDFW Staff Report should be part of your administrative record for this Project since you have relied upon it. Dominick Perez, City of Rancho Cucamonga May 22, 2017 Page 5 the removal of the tree." There is simply no indication that any effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the Project — not even the heritage trees. Second, Municipal Code § 17.80.040.13 provides that on heritage trees, "relocation to another location on the site is the preferred alternative subject to a written report by a landscape architect or arborist on the feasibility of transplanting the tree." There was no feasibility finding in the Arborist Report. Third, if relocation was impossible — a finding you cannot make at this point — Code § 17.80.040.B requires "replacement with the largest nursery -grown trees available as determined by the planning director or planning commission." There is no evidence in the record that the largest trees available are 15-gallon size, and we sincerely doubt this is the case. Greenhouse Gas Emissions We incorporate SWAPE's comments, attached, as our own. We also note that the 3,000 MTCO2e threshold you have adapted from the SCAQMD was developed under AB 32. The Legislature has since passed SB32 calling for further greenhouse gas ("GHG") reductions, and the 3,000 MTCOae standard may be too lenient. You have not addressed SB32 or Executive Order S-3-05 targets in your Negative Declaration, and the State must comply with them during the life of the Project. You have no demonstration on how this will be feasible. We also note that among the mitigation measures you should have considered but did not was providing electric charging capabilities for trucks at the distribution center. Noise Construction Noise : Subtopics a. and d. You claim the impact from construction noise will not be significant based on your consultant's statements that (1) noise levels will diminish from the construction site at 6 dBA per doubling of distance, and (2) the City's construction noise is exempted by ordinance. The first assertion does not provide substantial evidence for a conclusion that noise impacts will be less than significant: your consultant notes that some pieces of construction equipment you undoubtedly will use have a noise level of 92 or 95 dBA at 50 feet (see Noise Impact Analysis, Table 6); therefore, at 200 feet the noise can still reach 80 dBA, and as you note, the nearest apartments are 170 feet away. The second statement does not provide substantial evidence for a conclusion that construction noise will have a less than significant impact either: Municipal Code § 17.66.050(D)(4) says construction noise is exempt from regulation when noise levels do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent residential property line. Noise levels will reach 80 dBA or higher when only one of many pieces of construction equipment is in use. There is therefore substantial evidence to support a fair argument there will be a significant impact, and an EIR is required. Dominick Perez, City of Rancho Cucamonga May 22, 2017 Page 6 Operational Noise: Subtopic a. On operational noise, your consultant apparently modeled sound inputs from "the trucks' diesel engines, exhaust systems, braking, and forklifts." This excludes major sources of noise that come from distribution centers, such as hitching and unhitching of trailers, trash compactors, and back-up beepers: noises known to be disturbing to residents hundreds of feet away from distribution centers. See Attachment C (combined comments of multiple residents on the potential noise from the Sycamore Canyon Business Park Buildings 1 and 2 E1R, based on their experience of existing noise from distributions centers hundreds of feet away). Conclusion Please advise us when the City will be taking action on this Project (via the Planning Commission or the City Council or both), at collins("ia blumcollins.com and bentlui blumcollins.com, and add us to your notification list for all future CEQA actions under Public Resources Code § 21092.2 Thank you for your consideration. 1�e Coed 00// ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING CREATIVE PLACEMAKING AND PUBLIC ART A. Recitals. 1. Placemaking and public art enhances the quality of life for individuals living in, working in, and visiting Rancho Cucamonga by enhancing the physical beauty of the community; providing gathering places for residents who live in the community; encouraging the development and appreciation of art; and enhancing the quality of development projects and the image of the community. 2. This Ordinance will promote the general welfare by encouraging pride in the community, build vibrant and distinctive spaces through placemaking, increasing property values, enhancing the quality of life through artistic opportunities, uniting the community through shared cultural experiences, and creating a cultural legacy for future generations through the collection and exhibition of high -quality art in unique public spaces which reflects diverse styles that will acknowledge the past, usher in the future and create programs and activities that will further these goals. 3. On May 24, 2017, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a duly notice public hearing regarding this Ordinance, and thereafter adopted Planning Commission Resolution 17-48 setting forth its recommendation regarding this Ordinance. 4. On May 24, 2017, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing regarding this Ordinance. 5. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. B. Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Ordinance are true and correct. SECTION 2. The City Council finds further based the facts found to be true and correct in the preceding Section 1 and substantial evidence presented during its public hearing on this Ordinance as follows: 1. This Ordinance is consistent with the City's General Plan. This Ordinance meets General Plan Land Use Goal LU-14 by supporting public art as an important amenity of a beautiful City. This Ordinance also meets City Council Goal A11 by 13 developing a public art ordinance and funding mechanism to support art within publicly accessible spaces. 2. Adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), Section 15061(b)(3) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that this Ordinance will have a significant effect on the environment. This Ordinance does not propose any physical change to the environment itself, but instead revises existing land use regulations to require certain development projects that require discretionary review to include publicly accessible art and creates a process for administering a public art program. Pursuant to CEQA, the City will review the potential significant impacts of all development applications that are subject to the public art requirement and any discretionary action by the City to install public art pursuant to this Ordinance. Therefore, this Ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION 3. A new Chapter 2.26, entitled "Public Art Committee," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 2.26 - Public Art Committee 2.26.010 Public Art Committee. A. There is established a Public Art Committee to advise the Council regarding the selection, purchase, placement, and maintenance of art installed by the City or on City property, and expenditures from the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund. B. The Public Art Committee shall consist of five members appointed by the Council as follows: (i) one member of the Planning Commission; (ii) one member of the Parks and Recreation Commission; (iii) one member of the Community and Arts Foundation; and (iv) two members of the public to be appointed based on relevant work experience, trade, industry, or expertise. C. The City Council shall prescribe by resolution the duties, terms of service, qualifications, and compensation of committee members. D. The City Manager or his or her designee shall assist the Public Art Committee in fulfilling its duties. 2.26.020 Meetings. Regular meetings of the Public Art Committee shall be held at such time and place as is determined by resolution of the City Council." SECTION 4. A new Chapter 3.72, entitled "Public Art Trust Fund," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 3.72 - Public Art Trust Fund 3.72.010 Creation of Public Art Trust Fund. There is hereby created a special fund to be known as the "City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund." 3.72.020. Use of Funds A. All money received by the City from endowments or gifts to the City of Rancho Cucamonga designated for the arts or pursuant to Section 17.124.020.D.2 shall be placed in the Public Art Trust Fund. All money shall be deposited, invested, accounted for, and expended as follows: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Art Trust Fund shall only be utilized for the following purposes: a. The design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance, and insurance of public art work displayed by the City or on City property. b. Art education programs for the community conducted on City property; provided, that not more than five (5%) percent of the fund's annual budget shall be used for this purpose. Administrative costs reasonably related to either of the preceding purposes. Money deposited in the Public Art Trust Fund shall be held in a manner to avoid any commingling with other revenues and funds of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, except for temporary investments, and all funds shall be expended solely for the purposes for which they were collected. Any interest income earned by the money in the Public Art Trust Fund shall be deposited in the Public Art Trust Fund and shall be expended only for the purpose for which the money was originally collected. B. The City Council shall establish procedures for selecting art work to be purchased using funds found in the Public Art Trust Fund, which may include but shall not be limited to the following: (1) open competition; (2) limited competition; (3) invitation; (4) direct purchase; (5) donation; or (6) any combination of the above. 3.72.030 Return of Fees Paid In Lieu of Providing Public Art A. A project developer or its successor, may submit a written request to the City for the return of any fees paid pursuant to Section 17.124.020.D.2 in lieu of providing public art work that are not committed within ten years of payment, together will all interest earned thereon. The request shall be verified and shall include the date of payment; the amount paid and method of payment; the location of the development project for which the fee was paid; and a statement that the project developer or its successor is the payer of the fees and/or the current owner of the development project. B. The City Council shall review the request and determine if return of the then uncommitted portion of the fees and interest is appropriate and, if so, the method of refund. No refund shall be appropriate if the City Council determines that the fee is still needed for the purposes of the Public Art Trust Fund." SECTION 5. A new Chapter 17.124, entitled "Design Provisions for Public Art," is hereby added to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as follows: "Chapter 17.124 - Design Provisions for Public Art 17.124.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to promote the general welfare and enhance the quality of life for City residents, workers, and visitors by improved public placemaking which will require certain developments to include or provide for public art or architecture that qualifies as art. 17.124.020 Public Art Required. A. The requirements of this chapter shall apply to any development subject to site development review, minor design review, or design review that meets one or both of the following criteria: 1. All residential development projects that propose to develop four (4) or more dwelling units. 2. All commercial, office, or industrial development projects with a project valuation or valuations exceeding one million dollars ($1,000,000) in the aggregate, based on most recent International Code Council building valuation data. B. Notwithstanding anything else in this section, the requirements of this chapter shall not apply to: 1. Residential projects with a density equal to or less than 4 dwelling units per acre. 2. Residential projects that contain income restricted affordable housing units where the value of the restricted unit(s) equals or exceeds the minimum value of the art work that would otherwise be required. 3. Remodeling, addition to, or both of existing residential buildings or accessory structures. 4. Remodeling of existing commercial, office, or industrial buildings that do not include any exterior modifications to the building. 5. Remodeling, addition to, or both of existing commercial, office, or industrial buildings for which artwork was previously installed, donated, or for which an in lieu fee was paid pursuant to the requirements of this Chapter, regardless of whether such remodeling, addition to, or both includes interior modifications, exterior modifications, or both. 6. Public school facilities. 7. Places of worship. 8. Reconstruction of buildings that have been damaged by fire, flood, wind, earthquake, or other natural disaster, where the reconstructed buildings are substantially similar to the original buildings. 9. Wireless Communication Facilities. C. All development projects subject to this chapter must include art work that has a minimum value that meets or exceeds an amount equal to the sum of: $750 per residential unit developed: and $1 per square foot of commercial, office, or industrial development. D. In lieu of providing the art required by the preceding paragraph C, the applicant may do either of the following: 1. Donate to the City art work that meets or exceeds the minimum value of the art work; subject to the provisions of section 17.124.030 below. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, pay on a per unit basis, an in -lieu fee into the City's Public Art Trust Fund, equal to the minimum value of the art work that would otherwise be included in the development project. E. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. For purposes of this requirement, compliance shall be measured in light of the conditions of approval for the project, including but not limited to any approved phased development plan. In furtherance of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the City may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the Planning Director and City Attorney. 17.124.030 Donated Art Work A. Art work donated to the City pursuant to this chapter must meet the design standards in section 17.124.040 of this chapter and shall be subject to the final approval and acceptance by the City Council, upon recommendation of the Public Art Committee. Upon final acceptance by the City Council, the donated art work shall be the sole property of the City. B. If a developer elects to donate art work to the City in lieu of providing art work as required by section 17.124.020.C, the donation shall be secured by a cash deposit in an amount that meets or exceeds the required minimum value of the art work or a performance bond for the same amount and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The security, regardless of the form, shall become payable to the City and deposited into the City's Public Art Trust Fund in the event the developer fails to donate art work acceptable to the City as required by this chapter. 17.124.040 Public Art Design Standards A. For purposes of this chapter, "art work" means original or limited edition artistic creations, and may include, but is not limited to, sculptures, paintings, monuments, water features, glasswork, lighting, ceramics and in exceptional circumstances, landscaping elements. B. Media may include but are not be limited to, steel, bronze, wood, stone, tile, concrete, lighting, any other durable materials able to withstand outdoor conditions, or any combination of these, including in exceptional circumstances, plant materials. For these purposes, "durable" means lasting, enduring and highly resistant to deterioration due to weather or the passage of time. C. Art work must be of a scale and setting as to complement the adjacent physical building, improvements, and property. D. Art work must be installed in a public place, which means any exterior area on public or private property that is easily accessible to the general public or clearly visible to the general public from adjacent public property, such as a street or other public thoroughfare or sidewalk. F Art work must be accompanied by a plaque identifying the name of the art work, the artist(s), and the date of installation. The plaque must be installed in close proximity to the art work. I Art work installed on private property shall qualify towards the minimum landscaping requirements of Chapter 17.56. G. Art work may be combined with functional elements of the development project (such as bike racks, shade structures, bus shelters, trash receptacles) only if, when the elements are viewed as a whole, the expressive design elements predominate over utilitarian concerns. H. The following shall not count towards meeting the public art requirement of this chapter: 1. Landscaping, unless substantially comprised of durable elements that otherwise qualify as art work. 2. Mass-produced or "off the shelf' decorative or ornamental items. 3. Historical or memorial markers or statuary. Art work must meet the minimum required valuation for the project. 1. The project developer may claim the following expenses in satisfaction of the minimum value of the required art work: a. Artist's fees; b. Art materials; C. Fabrication or manufacturing of the art work; d. Transportation of the art work; e. Base, mounting, or pedestal for the art work; f. Building permits for installation of the art work; g. Identification plaque for the art work; h. Lighting instruments specifically lighting the art work; i. Installation of the art work; j. Structural engineering for the art work; k. Motors or subterranean equipment directly necessary for the installation of the art work; I. Water related costs for the art that includes artist designed water features not to exceed thirty (30%) percent of the total value of the art work; M. Art consultant fees (if applicable) not to exceed a maximum of fifteen (15%) percent of the value of the art work; and n. Any fees paid to public art experts (such as art conservators, qualified appraisers, etc.) that are required by the City. 2. The following expenses shall not be counted toward the minimum value of the required art work: a. Expenses related to locating the artist, including but not limited to, airfare, hotel, taxi fares and other travel related expenses; b. Architect, landscape architect, or other design professional fees; C. Site preparation for public art installation, including but not limited to grading, demolition or removal of items or structures and installation of utilities to the site; d. Landscaping surrounding the art; e. Items around the public art that is not conceptualized, designed, and fabricated by the selected artist; f. Utility fees associated with activating electronic or water generated art; g. Lighting elements not integral to the illumination of the art; h. Publicity, public relations, photographs, educational materials, business letterhead or logos bearing the sculpture's image; or i. Dedication ceremonies, including art unveilings or grand openings. J. Architecture and/or Landscape Architecture may be considered art work on a case -by -case basis based on factors that may include, but shall not be limited to: 1. Whether the architect/landscape architect is recognized by the professional or artistic community as demonstrated by a substantial record of artistic recognition in shows, museums, professional or industry awards or publications. 2. Whether, when the building or landscape architecture is viewed as a whole, the expressive architectural design elements predominate over utilitarian concerns. 3. Whether the architecture/landscape architecture was designed in collaboration with an artist who has: (a) experience with monumental scale sculpture; (b) major design control of the portions of the architecture to be considered as art; and (3) been involved in development of the project from early on in the design process. K. Commercial signage and/or artistic lighting may be considered art work on a case -by -case basis based on factors that may include, but shall not be limited to: 1, Whether the sign or lighting is an original work, based on a unique and original design. 2. Whether the designer is recognized by the artistic community as demonstrated by a substantial record of artistic recognition in shows, museums, or publications. 3. Whether, when the sign or lighting is viewed as a whole, the expressive design elements predominate over the commercial message or utilitarian concerns. 4. Whether the sign or lighting was designed in collaboration with a designer who has: (a) experience designing signs that are unique and original; (b) substantial control over those portions of the sign to be considered as art; and (3) been involved in design of the sign from early on in the design process. 17.124.050 Submittals. The project developer shall submit, on a form or forms provided by the City, an application for installation of art work on private property or donation of art work to the City that contains the following information as applicable to the project in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work.: A. The architect, landscape architect, designer or artists' name(s), qualifications and examples of past work. B. Preliminary sketches, photographs or other documentation of sufficient descriptive clarity to indicate the nature of the proposed art work and an artist warranty as to the originality of title to the art work. C. An appraisal or other evidence of the value of the proposed art work, including acquisition and installation costs, that demonstrates satisfaction of the minimum required value of the art work. D. A written agreement executed by the artist or artists who created the art work that expressly waives all rights that may be waived under the California Art Preservation Act, the Visual Artists Rights Act, or other applicable state and federal laws. E. Preliminary plans containing such detailed information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the location of the art work and its compatibility with the proposed development project and/or with the character of adjacent developed parcels and the existing neighborhood. F. A written statement executed by the property owner and approved by the City Attorney that requires the landowner or his or her successors and assigns to defend, indemnify, and hold the City harmless against any liability, loss, damage, costs or expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising from any claim, action or liability related to the art work. G. If the project developer proposes to satisfy the public art requirement with architecture, it must before its application can be deemed complete submit to the approving authority at a pre -application review: (a) a maquette and other materials that satisfactorily illustrate the proposed conceptual development; and (b) a statement explaining why the architecture should be considered an art work, including but not limited to an explanation of the ideas, meaning, cultural significance, or conceptual complexity expressed in the architecture. Nothing in this paragraph shall be deemed to require the reviewing authority's approval of the submittal at the pre - application review before the application is deemed complete. 17.124.060 Applications to Donate Art Work to the City Applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to additional review by the Public Art Committee, which shall make a recommendation to the City Council regarding whether the proposed donation is consistent with the purposes of this chapter. 17.124.070 Ownership and Maintenance of Art Work Placed on Private Property. A. All art work installed pursuant to this chapter on the site of a development project shall remain the property of the owner of the site for which the final building permit or certificate of occupancy related to the development project was obtained and the owner's successors and assigns, which owner must provide all maintenance necessary to preserve and maintain the art work in good condition and in the manner approved by the City. B. The obligation to maintain the art work shall be enforced as follows 1. Prior to the installation of the art work on a development project, the property owner shall record a document with the county recorder setting forth a description of the art work and acknowledging the obligation of the property owner to repair and maintain it. This document and the underlying covenant shall run with the land and provide notice to future property owners of the obligation to repair and maintain the art work and of certain limitations related to any federal, state or local laws governing the rights of the artists including but not limited to rights regarding the alteration, modification or relocation of subject art work. The City shall be a signatory party to this document, and its final form and content shall be approved by the City Attorney. 2. The obligation to maintain the art work shall include, without limitation, preserving the art work in good condition to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, protecting, repairing, restoring, or replacing the art work in the event of physical defacement, mutilation, alteration or destruction, and securing and maintaining insurance coverage in an amount to be approved by the City for: (a) fire; (b) flood, wind, earthquake, or other natural disaster; (b) vandalism; and (c) extended liability. 3. Any time the City determines that art work has not been maintained in substantial conformity with the manner in which it was originally approved, the City shall require the current property owner to either: a. Maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work; or b. After reasonable notice: (i) pay the lesser of either the costs estimated by the City to be required to maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work and/or secure and maintain insurance for the artwork; and (ii) provide the City or its representatives reasonable access to the property to perform any necessary to maintain, repair, restore, or replace the art work. C. If an owner wishes to replace art work required by this chapter for any reason, including but not limited to theft, destruction, removal, or personal preference, the replacement art work shall be subject to the review and approval of the original approving authority, which shall determine whether the replacement art work meets the criteria set forth in this chapter." SECTION 6. The City Council declares that, should any provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance be rendered or declared invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify as to the adoption of this Ordinance. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2017. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2017, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice Reynolds City Clerk zo17/zoi8 Improvement Program Presented by: of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Fax: 909.477.2741 www.cityofrc.us General zo171zo18 Improvement Program STAFF REPORT DATE: May 24, 2017 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer INITIATED BY: Jerry A. Dyer, Principal Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that by minute action the Planning Commission find the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2017/18 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as attached as Exhibit B is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit A, to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP document includes a General Plan Policies section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi -year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City budgets for funded projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. ANALYSIS: The projects have been categorized by type of project (Beautification, Drainage, Facilities, etc.), which are in alphabetical order within each category. The individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, year funded, and a map showing the project location. FISCAL IMPACT: Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure I, Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. There are 62 projects totaling just over $51,000,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 62 projects previously identified, 22 projects just under $46,000,000 are identified as future and unfunded. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local development community, and external government agencies. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Government Code 65401 Exhibit B - Fiscal Year 2017/2018 Capital Improvement Program (distributed under separate cover) Exhibit C - General Plan Policies (distributed under separate cover) Government Code 66401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. zo17/zo18 Improvement Program Presented by: Engineering Cucamonga es Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Fax: 909.477.2741 www.cityofrc.us Cateqories A. Beautification....... B. Drainage .............. C. Facilities ............... D. Miscellaneous...... CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 SUMMARY Budgeted Unfunded General Plan: Policy Reference ............... (3) $ 700,000 $ ............... (2) $ 3,950,000 $ .............. (16) $ 16,205,240 $ ............... (8) $ 1,974,160 $ E. Municipal Utility .................... (9) F. Parks ....................................... (5) G. Railroad Crossings .................. (2) H. Streets ..................................... (10) I. Traffic ...................................... (7) TOTAL ............................... (62) J. Future & Unfunded Projects.... (22) $ 19,194,930 $ - $ 1,093,890 $ 1,890,000 $ 125,000 $ 45,000,000 $ 5,927,000 $ 3,600,000 $ 2,238,750 $ - $ 51,408,970 $ 50,490,000 GP: CM-3.11,PS-12.7 GP: CM-4.4 GP: ED-3.1, PF-1.1, PF-1.4, PF-1.5 GP: CM-1.4, CM-2.1, CM-3.7, CS-6.3, LIJ-11.2, PS-12.4 GP: PF-1.4, RC-4.2 GP: CS-1.8, PF-1.4 GP: CM-1.2, CM-4.4 GP: CM-1.1, CM-2.1, CM-4.4, ED-4.3 GP: CM-4.1, CM-4.2 $ 45,881,600 GP: CM-1.1, CM-4.4, ED-3.1, PS-12.4 Index CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2017/18 No. Project A. Beautification 1 Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda - Community Trail West Side 2 LMD 2 Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations (Mufti -Phased Project) 3 LMD 4R Water Conservation and Landscape Renovations (Mulb-Phased Project) B. Drainage 1 Cucamonga Storm Drain Upper Phase 3 -East of Hellman Ave, Amethyst to 19 St 2 McKinley St at Ramona Ave Storm Drain Repair C. Facilities i Archibald Library -Ofice Re -design 2 Central Park- Emergency Backup Power (Design Only) 3 City Facilities - Roofing Replacement 8 Repairs 4 Civic Center- Carpet and Reconfiguration 5 Civic Center - Parking Deck Maintenance 6 Civic Center- Waterproofing 8 Planter Box Repair 7 Cultural Center -Celebration Hall Air -Wall Replacement 8 Cultural Center- Courtyard Redesign 9 Cultural Center - Loading Bay 10 Energy Efficiency Facility Improvements 11 Fire District - Jersey Station If 74) Data Center (Bldg 1) 12 Fire District- Jersey Station (174) Training Facility 13 Fire District - San Bernardino Station (172) Relocation/Police Station 14 Fire District - Water Conservation Landscaping 8 Emerg. Vehicle Circulation Driveway Improvements 15 Public Works Services Department- Warehouse Expansion 16 Sports Complex - Removal of Soccer Field Lighting Fixtures and Pales at Goals Site D. Miscellaneous 1 9th St along north side west of Vineyard Ave - Sidewalk Improvements fund Account Amount(5) Beaunfcatlon 1110316565011829110-0 150,000 LMD 2 11313035650 1787131-0 110,000 LMD 4R 11343035650/1787134-0 440,000 Beautification UnFunded Total: 0 Beautification Funded Total: 700,000 General Drainage 1112303565011928112-0 800,000 Measure) 11763035650/1928176-0 400,000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1928198-0 2.700.000 3,900,000 Unknown 1198303565011954198-0 50,000 Drainage UnFunded Total: 0 Drainage Funded Total: 3,950,000 Library Reserve 1329601-5606 135,350 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1914288-0 75,000 Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 250,000 Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 219,000 Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 30,000 Capital Reserve 10250015650/1950025-0 50,000 Capital Reserve 1025001-5602 389,500 Park Development 11204015650/1894120-0 200,000 Park Development 11204015650/1895120-0 40,000 Capital Reserve 10250015650/1975025-0 71,390 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1971288-0 215001000 Fire Capital Projects 328MI5650/1735288-0 25,000 Fire Capital Projects 3288501565011733288-0 9,420,000 Fire Capital Projects 3288501-5607 600,000 Capital Reserve 1025D015650/1927025-0 2,140,000 LMD 1 1130303-5607 30,000 PD 85 1848303-5607 30000 60,000 Facilities UnFunded Total: 0 Facilities Funded Total: 16,205,240 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1808198-0 43,000 Safe Route To School 12343035650/1808234-0 901800 133,800 Index - 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2017118 No. Project Fund Account Amount l$) 2 ADA Ramps at Various Locations Measure 1 11773035650/1150177-0 100,000 3 Arrow Rte and Rochester Ave, N/E Corner - Animal Exercise Yard Improv. Park Development 11204015650/1955120-0 80,000 4 Community Trail Drainage Improvements LMD 1 1130303-5607 10,500 5 Green Bike Lanes 8 Safety Enhancements AB 2766 Air Quality Impry 11052085650/1952105-0 725,500 6 Pacific Electric Trail - Block Wall East of Victoria Park Lane LMD 2 Victoria 1131303-5604 13,200 7 Paseo Lighting Retrofit LMD 2 Victoria 11313035650/1716131-0 290,000 8 Southwest Cucamonga Class I Bike Trail Project AB 2766 Air Quality Impry 11052085650/1953105-0 621,160 Miscellaneous UnFunded Total: 0 Miscellaneous Funded Total: 1,974,160 E. Municipal Utility - Electrical 1 6th Street from Utica Avenue to The Vine - Electric Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/1967705-0 885,000 2 Citywide Safety Light LED Retrofit SLD 1 1151303-565011974151-0 369,200 3 Citywide Street Light Acquisition SLD 1 1151303-5650/1969151-0 2,701,720 SLD 2 1152303-5650/1969152-0 3,237,210 SLD 3 1153303-5650/1969153-0 1,245,870 SLD 4 1154303-5650/1969154-0 648,460 SLD 5 1155303-5650/1969155-0 283,380 SLD6 1156303-5650/1969156-0 439,760 SLD 7 1157303-5650/1969157.0 901,850 SLD 8 1158303-565011969158-0 321.040 9,779,290 4 Citywide Street Light LED Retrofit SLD 1 1151303-5650/1973151.0 1,164,080 SLD 2 1152303-5650/1973152-0 1,394,800 SLD 3 1153303-5650/1973153-0 539,800 SLD 4 1154303-5650/1973154-0 279,400 SLD 5 1155303-565011973155-0 122, 100 SLD 6 1156303-5650/1973156-0 189,480 SLD 7 1157303-565011973157-0 388,580 Municipal Utility 1705303-5650/1973705-0 46.2 4,121,440 5 Commercial Smart Meter Replacement Municipal Utility 17053035650/1938705-0 100,000 6 Haven Avenue at 6th St- Street Light Installation Municipal Utility 17053035650/1948705-0 25,000 7 Haven Ave from Foothill Blvd to Church Street - Electric Line Extension Municipal Utility 1705303565011966705-0 585,000 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1966288-0 460,_000 1,045,000 8 Rancho Cucamonga Fiber Optics Network Fiber Optic Network 1711303565011910711-0 2,050,000 9 Utica Ave from 4th Street to 6th Street- Electric Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/1968705-0 800,000 Municipal Utility UnFunded Total: 0 Municipal Utility Funded Total: 19,194,930 F. Parks 1 Central Park - Phase II Design Study Park Development 11204015650/1660120-0 250,000 2 Central Park - Trail Head Improvements Park Development 11204015650/1871120-0 180,890 (Design with Construction TBD) Park Development 11204015650/1871120-0 1,890.000 2,070,890 3 Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II Park Development 11204015650/1664120-0 538,000 4 Heritage Park - Handicap Parking Stalls and Pavement Rehabilitation Park Development 11204015650/1961120-0 55,000 PD 85 18483035650/1961848-0 55000 110,000 Index - 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2017118 No. Project Fund Account 5 Rubberized Surface Replacement G. Railroad Crossings 1 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur - New Concrete Panels 2 Etiwanda Ave Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks H. Streets 1 Sth St from Milliken to Charles Smith -Pavement Rehabilitation 2 Civic Center and Courthouse Pavement Rehabilitation (Construction cost share with San Bernardino County) 3 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San Bernardino Rd - Street Improvements (Design) 4 Foothill Blvd from Haven Ave to Milliken Ave - Pavement Rehabilitation 5 Hermosa Ave from Arrow to Foothill - Pavement Rehabilitation 6 Hermosa Ave north of Foothill Boulevard to Church St - Street Widening 7 Highland Ave from Archibald Ave to Haven Ave -Pavement Rehabilitation (Design with Construction funded FY 18/19) 8 Jersey Blvd from Haven to Rochester - Pavement Rehabilitation 9 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations (Design and Construction) 10 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place to Cherry Ave -Street Extension (Environmental, Design and Flood Control Review) I. Traffic 1 6th at Hellman Ave - Traffic Signal Installation 2 Base Line Rd at Lion St- Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) 3 Day Creek Boulevard- Upgrade Left Turn Phases 4 East Ave at Highland Ave - Traffic Signal Installation 5 Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization Phase I 6 Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade - Citywide LIAD9 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Citywide Infrastructure Unknown 1139303-5607 Parks UnFunded Total: Parks Funded Total: 1174303565011819174-0 1198303565011922198-0 xx�000c000a11922xxx-0 Railroad Crossings UnFunded Total: Railroad Crossings Funded Total: Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1930174-0 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1930198-0 Law Enforcement Reserve 10177015650/1959017-0 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1964198-0 Measure) 11773035650/1932177-0 Measure) 11773035650/1934177-0 Beautification 11103165650/1976110.0 Gas Tax 11743035650/1976174-0 Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1960174-0 Unknown 1xxxxxx565011960xxx-0 Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1929174-0 Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1929288-0 Gas Tax R&T 7360 11743035650/1022174-0 Road Maint & Rehab 11793035650/1022179-0 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1022198-0 AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 18133035650/1601813-0 AD 88-2 Etiwanda/Highlnd 1813303565011601813-0 Streets UnFunded Total: Streets Funded Total: Amount ($) 15,000 1,890,000 1,093,890 75,000 50,000 45.000.000 45,050,000 45,000,000 125,000 500,000 402,_000 902,000 150,000 50,000 850,000 250,000 350,000 25�_000 600,000 25,000 450 000 475,000 815,000 35_,000 850,000 450,000 1,000,000 77✓0_000 2,200,000 50,000 3,150,000 3,200,000 3,600,000 5,927,000 Transportation 11243035650/1957124-0 546,000 Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1921198-0 80,000 Transportation 11243035650/1956124-0 63,750 Transportation 11243035650/1958124-0 469,000 AB 2766 Air Duality 11052085650/1900105-0 112,810 Transportation 11243035650/1900124-0 207190 320,000 Transportation 11243035650/1831124-0 650,000 Index - 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2017118 No. Project Fund Account Amount (S) 7 Tema Vista Parkway at Spruce -Safety Lighting Installation SLU 4 11543035650/1902154-0 110,000 Traffic UnFunded Total: 0 Traffic Funded Total: 2,238,750 J. Future & Unfunded Projects 1 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing west of Etiwanda Avenue Unknown xxrpoxxlooW1839xxx-0 16,953,000 (Future Grade Separation) 2 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto - Storm Drain Unknown *00000000ad1805xxx-0 1,215,000 3 Arrow Route along the s/s Soo to 1300' e/o 1-15 freeway - Widening Unknown 1xIor303565011907xxx-0 300,000 (Right -of -Way is needed and not part of cost) 4 Cultural Center - Exterior Joint Replacement and Exterior Painting Capital Reserve 10250015650/1890025-0 500,000 5 Distribution System Automation Municipal Utility 1705303565011916705-0 250,000 6 East Ave from Chickasaw, west side, north 370 feet- Widen and Sidewalk Unknown w0000000wd1931xxxA 110,000 (Right -of -Way is needed and not part of cost) 7 Etiwanda Ave from Sth St to Arrow Route - Street Widening Improvements Transportation 11243035650/1076124-0 450,000 8 Etiwanda Ave Line Extension Municipal Utility 17053035650/1885705-0 602,500 9 Fire District- Central Station 178 (New Fire Station) Fire Capital Projects 32885015650/1645288-0 11,850,000 10 Haven Ave from Banyan to Wilson along the East side - sidewalk Unknown )00000 0000x/1864xxx-0 264,000 (Seeking Grant with City match) 11 Haven Ave from Foothill to Base Line - Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1933177-0 850,000 12 Heritage Park - Bridge Replacements PD 85 1848303565011963848-0 50,000 (Design with Construction funded by phases) Unknown 1xxxxxx5650/1963xxx-0 TBD 50,000 13 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to Wilson - Pavement Rehabilitation Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1815198-0 250,000 Related to Hermosa storm drain 14 Hermosa Ave from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson - Storm Drain General Drainage 11123035650/1810112-0 500,000 Related to Hermosa pavement rehabilitation Citywide Infrastructure 11983035650/1810198-0 1,750.000 2,250,000 15 La Grande from Hellman Avenue to Amethyst Avenue - Street Improvements Comm Dev Block Grant 12043035650/1965204-0 853,100 16 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven - Pavement Rehabilitation Unknown xr00000 000c11793xxx-0 560,000 Related to Lemon storm drain 17 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet west - Storm Drain Unknown x 0000000cal1791xxx-0 1,700,000 Related to Lemon pavement rehabilitation 18 LoanMart Stadium - Field Renovation Capital Reserve 1025001-5607 160,000 19 LoanMart Stadium - Scoreboard and Production Rm Equipment Replacement EquipNeh Replacement 17120015650M951712-0 1.100,000 20 Paul A. Biane Library - Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Unknown x 00000 oDcdl867xxx-0 4.250,000 21 Rochester Ave and Arrow Route, North East Corner - Street Widening Unknown lo0000000000000000c-0 414.000 and Sidewalk Improvements 22 Rochester Ave from Base Line to Banyan - Pavement Rehabilitation Measure 1 11773035650/1935177-0 950,000 Future & Unfunded Total: 45,881,600 Index - 4 Beautification Typical Beautification projects include parkway landscape, median islands, plant material replacement, community trail landscape and open space preservation. The City strives to plan and budget for projects that exemplify Rancho Cucamonga's aesthetic standards, particularly in areas of the City that are older and undergoing rehabilitation. Many Beautification projects bring these areas into alignment with the rest of the City. The City adheres to a Xeriscape policy in all of its plant material selection, ensuring current water conservation standards, as well as the adaptability of plants, trees, flowers and shrubs to Southern California's warm and dry climate. This practice helps to reduce ongoing maintenance and irrigation costs. The Beautification Fee Program was discontinued in 2014 and fees are no longer being collected. Current and future projects will utilize these funds until the remaining fund balance has been depleted. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 Haven Ave from Wilson to Vivienda- $ 150,000 Community Trail 2 LIVID 2 Water Conservation $ 110,000 3 LMD 4R Water Conservation $ 440,000 $ 700,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $150,000 • Beautification ■ LMD 4R ,„ LMD 2 $110,000 A Project Number: 800-2016-08 JL Key: 1829 Object: 5650 Haven Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street - Community Trail West side Project Location: Haven Avenue - From Wilson Avenue to Vivienda Street, west side ECT Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: Construction of an equestrian trail on Haven Avenue, west side. Project includes installation of 2 rail PVC fence, installation of decomposed granite and installation of mow curbs. Justification: This stretch will complete and connect missing sections of the existing community trail on the west side of Haven Avenue as part of the trail master plan. It will also improve the appearance of the west side of Haven Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $o $100,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $100,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,OD0 Contingency $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund (110) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Impact on Operations: This stretch will add an additional quarter mile to the City's trail inventory, requiring trash removal, weed abatement, and routine maintenance. Al Project Number: JL Key: 1787 Object: 5650 LMD 2 Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Project Location: LMD 2 Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2O18 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rodia � B IL n xo. <fMmy� " o ��• n I� Wz Description: Continuation of previous year's project on Victoria Park Lane, just east of Day Creek Boulevard and includes the removal of turf in parkways and tract inlets, along with converting existing planter sections with low water use landscape plants and materials. Justification: Reduce water usage and labor costs to irrigate and maintain landscaping in LMD 2. Demonstrate to public that drought tolerant landscaping is aesthetically pleasing and easy to maintain. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $38,680 $ ADD $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,680 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $246,070 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $346,070 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $284,750 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $394,750 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL LMD 2 (131) $294,750 $130,= $0 $0 $0 $0 $394,750 Total Costs: $284,750 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $394,750 Impact on Operations: Reduced water usage by 3O% in this area as well as some reduction in maintenance costs A Project Number: 1L Key: 1787 Object: 5650 LMD 4R Water Conservation / Landscape Renovation Project Location: LMD4R Est. Construction Start/End 07/2017—06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rodia Description: Continuation of previous year's turf removals and replacement with drought tolerant landscaping. Work will be done mostly in parkways and paseos along Base Line Road towards the east from Haven Avenue on the south side of Base Line Road. Justification: Reduce water usage and labor costs to irrigate and maintain landscaping in LMD-4R. Demonstrate to public that drought tolerant landscaping is aesthetically pleasing and easy to maintain. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 50 $0 $0 So $0 $0 s0 Design/Plan Review $70,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,450 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 5o So Construction $548,080 $440.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $988,080 Inspection & Administration $1,780 $0 $o 50 $0 $0 $1,780 Contingency $o $0 $o 50 $0 $0 5o Total Costs: $620,310 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,060.310 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 201711 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL LIVID 4R/Tern Vista (134) $620,310 $440,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $1.060,310 Total Costs: $620,310 $440.000 50 $o $0 $o $1,060,310 Impact on Opentlons: Reduced water usage by 30% in this area as well as some reduction in maintenance costs. A Drainage Drainage projects include the construction of new storm drains, storm drain lateral connections, flood control channels, catch basins, debris racks and other forms of infrastructure that protect the public right-of-way from hazards caused by flooding and severe weather events. Drainage projects are scheduled and planned due to the availability of funding, safety concerns, new development, and weather/emergency events. In extreme circumstances, inadequate drainage can prevent development from taking place. The City consults with many other agencies when constructing new drainage improvements, including utility companies, the Cucamonga Valley Water District, the San Bernardino Flood Control District and the Army Corps of Engineers, as needs dictate. Drainage projects are typically funded from Drainage Funds and eligible street funding sources such as Measure I or Gas Tax. Prolect List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 Cucamonga SD Upper Ph3 - e/o Hellman, $ 3,900,000 Amethyst- 19th St 2 McKinley St at Ramona Ave Storm Drain $ 50,000 Repair $ 3,950,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $2,750,1) ■General Drainage ■ Measure I 400,000 Citywide Infrastructure Project Number: 800-2016-01 JL Key: 1928 Object: 5650 Cucamonga Storm Drain Upper Phase 3, e/o Hellman Avenue, Amethyst Street to 19th Street Project Location: East of Hellman Avenue, Amethyst Street to 19th Street Est. Construction Start/End: 04/2018—10/2018 Project Status: Under Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David ECT LO (]ON, .,�aues r euc.,,,— � r.xcnieu ewn J�''2q' C Description: Construct the Master Plan Storm Drain, install storm drain mainline, install catch basins, manholes, Laterals, curb and gutter, sidewalks and overlay the entire road with asphalt rubber hot mix. Justification: This project will improve the drainage problems within the area and enhance the traffic circulation, including the improvement of pedestrian safety. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,D00 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $230,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 Contingency $0 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 Total Costs: $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 21 TBD TOTAL General Drainange Fund(112) $0 $800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Measure I Fund (176) $0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S400,000 Infrastructure Fund (198) $0 $2,700,000 $0 so so $0 $2,700,000 Total Costs: $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. In addition, the storm drain will allow for the flood zone designation to be changed for the residents and businesses in the area, and relieving the need for additional flood insurance. B1 Project Number: JL Key: 1954 Object: 5650 McKinley Street at Ramona Avenue Storm Drain Repair Project Location: McKinley Street at Ramona Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 10/2017 - 11/2017 Project Status: Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Jerry Dyer Description This project involves the removal of an existing catch basin and construction of a new catch basin and some drainage pipe. Justification: This project will elimate the existing failed corrigated metal pipe and divert the drainage flows to the existing open channel to handle the flows more efficiently. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 2 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction 50 $42,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,250 Inspection & Administration $0 $3,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500 Contingency $0 $4,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,250 Total Costs: $0 MA00 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Infrastructure Fund (198) $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $50,000 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance during storm events like sand bags and debris clean-up, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. a Facilities � 414 JO �; r► iiWill Projects that construct new buildings or that either improve, add on to, or renovate existing buildings and ancillary structures are typically classified as Facilities Projects. These projects ultimately result in new structures being added to the City's fixed facility inventory; however, some projects placed in this category are considered capital rehabilitation as they focus on the remodeling or restoration of existing facilities. The majority of these projects are funded via City Reserve funds. Major projects may qualify for state, federal and/or grant funding. Typical operating expenses for facilities include increases in staffing, building and systems maintenance costs, overhead expenses and utilities. Project List & FY 2017-18 Exoenditures 1 Archibald Library - Office Re -design $ 135,350 2 Central Park - Emergency Backup Power $ 75,000 3 City Facilities - Roofing Rplcmnt & Rprs $ 250,000 4 Civic Center - Carpet & Reconfiguration $ 219,000 5 Civic Center - Parking Deck Maintenance $ 30,000 6 Civic Center - Waterproofing & Planter $ 50,000 Box Repair 7 Cultural Center- Celebration Hall Air -Wall $ 389,500 Replacement 8 Cultural Center - Courtyard Redesign $ 200,000 9 Cultural Center - Loading Bay $ 40,000 10 Energy Efficiency Facility Improvement $ 71,390 11 Fire District - Jersey Station (174) Data $ 2,500,000 Center (Bldg 1) 12 Fire District - Jersey Station (174) $ 25,000 Training Facility 13 Fire District - San Bernardino Station $ 9,420,000 (172) Relocation 14 Fire District - Water Conserv. $ 600,000 Landscaping & Emerg Veh Ciruclation Driveway Improv 15 Public Works Services Dept- Warhouse $ 2,140,000 Expansion 16 Sports Complex - Removal of Soccer $ 60,000 Field Lighting Fixtures and poles @ Goal Sites $ 16,205,240 Sources of Fundine for FY 2017-18 $12,62( ■ Capital Reserve ■PD 85 ■ Park Development $3,149,890 f30,000 $135,350 $240,000 $30,000 LMD 1 ■ Library Reserve ■ Fire Capital Projects Project Location: Archibald Library staff areas: first floor (Circulation staff area) and second floor (staff area and literacy office) Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Design and Build Department: Library Project Manager: Brian Sternberg Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5606 Archibald Library - Office Redesign ljulij�,i: r y _� Y -= T s I _ I_ .N• �� UA9L l INF Fin cE7 eek yl F� <- JI .Jt e r YI ITT MtiiiA3J 9T 13 s 13 exccx. V v3 5,� 33 m A R -J LRJOI 1- Description: Redesign and new furniture for staff areas at the Archibald Library, including first floor staff office and area in Circulation, second floor administration area, staff room, and offices; and second floor literacy offices. Most of the work will be cosmetic. The redesign will be done in two phases. Phase I will include first Floor staff office and area in Circulation, Passport Office and second floor literacy offices. Phase 11 will include the second floor administration area, staff room and offices. Justification: Existing staff area is over 20 years old and contains all original furniture, with the exception of the chairs. Limited storage space and functional cubicles has led to boxes, carts, and library materials crowding staff areas. Creating a more efficient and ergonomic space will allow for better workflow, better working conditions, as well as more inviting for the public into admin area. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 T80 TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 So $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $2,500 $2,500 $0 $0 $0 50 55,000 Right-of-way $0 SO $0 $0 So $0 So Construction $67,150 $132,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 5200,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $0 Contingency $0 5o 5o So 5o $0 $0 Total Costs: $69,650 $135,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201718 201819 201912 202021 TBD TOTAL Library Reserve (329) $69,650 $135,350 $0 is $0 $0 $205,000 Total Costs: $69,650 $135,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $205,000 Impact on Operations: No impact on operations. Overall space remains the same. C1 Project Number: 8OD-2017-16 JL Key: 1914 Object: 5650 Central Park - Emergency Backup Power Project location: Iyl� / /) Central Park � �LLi Est. Construction Start/End TBD Project Status: Design Department: Eng/Fire/PW Project Manager: C Billings/M. Courtney/Ty Q. Description: To design an emergency backup power system that will provide 100% power for Central Park which is to be used as an evacuation center. Justification: The emergency back up power will be used during emergency situations where Central Park is used as an evacuation center. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2 18 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so Design/Plan Review s0 $75,000 $5,000 $0 so s0 $80,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o so Construction $0 so $0 $0 $o $0 so Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so so Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Fire Fund (288) $0 $75,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Total Costs: $0 $75,000 $5,000 $o $0 $0 $80,000 Impact on Operations: None C2 Project Number. 1L Key: Object: 5602 City Facilities - Roof Replacement and Repair Project Location: Animal Care and Adoption Center, Cultural Arts Center, Lion East and ' �`- r Lion West Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Ty Quaintance Description: Repair roof systems at Animal Care and Adoption Center, Cultural Arts Center and Lions East. Replace roofing system at Lions West, Justification: During Fiscal Year 15/16 a consultant performed an evaluation of the roofing systems at all City facilities, with the exception of the Civic Center. The results of the roofing survey recommended that the roofs at these noted facilities need to be replaced and/or repaired. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 T8D TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $30,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2 7 1 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TEID TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $30,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 Total Costs: $30,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 Impact on Operations: Replacement or repair of roofing systems will reduce roof maintenance requirements at these facilities C3 Civic Center - Carpet and Reconfiguration Project Location: Civic Center Est. Construction Start/End; 7/2017 — 6/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: PW/CSD/Finance/CMO Project Manager: Jeff Geith/Noah Daniels/Elisa Cox Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5602 Description: Design and construction of various interior improvements including replacement of carpet in the upper level rotunda area and on the main staircase; reconfiguration of the Community Services Department's break and mail rooms (design only); reconfiguration of the Finance Department's offices to accommodate the relocation of Special District's staff; and reconfiguration of the Communications Division's offices to accommodate key Department staff. Justification: The existing carpet in the rotunda area was installed in 1990 and has reached the end of its useful life. The reconfiguration of the Finance Department and Communications Division offices will provide space for key staff members to be more efficiently located to better serve internal and external customers. Reconfiguration of the Community Services Department's break and mail rooms will create dedicated work and break spaces for staff. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TRD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $74,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,000 Furnishings $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Construction $0 $130,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $730,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Total Costs: $0 $219,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $819,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019120 2020 21 TED TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $0 $219,000 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $819,000 Total Costs: $0 $219,1300 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $819,000 Impact on Operations: Replacement of the carpet in the upper level rotunda will reduce maintenance required for this flooring. The reconfigurations will result in providing additional and more efficient space for key Department staff. C4 Project Location: Civic Center Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Jeff Geith Project Number: A Key: Object: 5607 Civic Center - Parking Deck Maintenance _ � l FOb�ILl—ELV� Description: Remove and repair joints then apply sealant to parking deck. Justification: The existing membrane was installed in 2009 and requires a maintenance and repair to extend the integrity of the system. A maintenance on the membrane system should be performed every 5 yrs. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 202012 TED TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right-of-way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $o $o $20,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $o Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 2 2020 21 TT� TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $o $o $30,000 Total Costs: $0 $30,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Impact on Operations: None C5 Project Number: 1L Key: 1950 Object: 5650 Civic Center - Waterproofing & Planter Box Repair Project Location Civic Center Est. Construction Start/End 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Public works Services Project Manager: Jeff Geith Description: Waterproof and repair all existing exterior joints at the Civic Center. Also include resealing of the upper level planters and complete weather proofing of the exterior brick. Justification: The existing elastomeric caulking and exterior joints at the Civic Center are in need of repairs. Along with all the exterior joints, the exterior brick face of the Civic Center needs to have a weather proofing brick seal applied to prevent the brick from absorbing moisture. Project Cost Estimate (S): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $50.000 50 $0 $0 50 $501000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 So 50 $0 Construction $0 $0 $1,750,000 $0 50 50 $1,750,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $50,000 $0 50 $0 $50,000 Contingency $0 $0 5175,000 $0 $0 So $175,000 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 51,975,000 $0 $o $0 $2,025,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2 17 1 2018/19 2019 20 2020 21 TTM TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) SO $50,000 51,975,000 so So $0 $2,025,000 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $1,975,000 $0 50 $0 52,025,000 Impact on Operations: None C6 Project Number: A Key: Object: 5602 Cultural Center - Celebration Hall Air -Wall Replacement Project Location Cultural Center Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017—06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Neil Plummer Description: Replace existing air -wall system with new system. Justification: The existing air -wall system is 12 years old and obsolete. Replacement parts for it are no longer made and are difficult to find When the air -wall breaks down, there are long delays waiting for repairs/parts. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $0 So $0 510,000 Right -of -Way $o So So $0 50 So $0 Construction $0 $345,000 So So $0 $0 $345,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Contingency $0 $34,500 $0 So $0 5o $34,500 Total Costs: $0 $389,500 $o $0 $0 $0 $389,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $0 $389,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $389,500 Total Costs: $0 $389,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $389,500 Impact on Operations: None C7 Project Location: 12505 Cultural Center Drive Est. Design Start/End: 0812017 10/2017 Project Status: Design Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Ehsa Cox Project Number: JL Key: 1894 Object: 5650 Cultural Center -Courtyard Redesign VICTORY. C OR=TCRPAVDIANEL• Rvy W Mo. cote F. vEMINAIL Le:9J— c PROJECT LOCATIO� i L Description: The Cultural Center Courtyard Redesign project is intended to take a Primarily passive, outdoor space with little shade or seating areas and redesign it to encourage greater pedestrian access and use. Amenities will include shade and lighting as well as a permanent outdoor stage to facilitate outdoor events, concerts and rentals as well as improvements to spectator comfort. Improvements will also include repainting of the Cultural Center as well as possible relocation of the box office and Friends of the Library Bookstore. Justification: The improvements will reduce staff time for set up and take down and improve flow and continuity with the rest of Victoria Gardens. Relocation of the box office will increase visibility and relocation of the Friends of the Library Bookstore will improve visibility and customer access. The redesign project will open up new opportunities for rentals and increase ticket sales at the Lewis Family Playhouse. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 5o $o $0 5o so 5o Design/Plan Review $14,580 $200,000 $0 $0 s0 s0 $214,580 Right -of -Way $o So So So So 50 So Construction $0 $0 $2,000.000 $0 5o 50 $2,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 s0 so so 50 5o $0 -ontingency $o $0 so $0 $0 So so Total Costs: $14,580 $200,000 $2,000,000 so so $o $2,214,590 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020121 TBD Park Development Fund (120) $14,580 $200,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $214.580 Unknown $0 5o $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Total Costs: $14,580 $200,000 $2,000,000 $0 so $0 $2,214,580 Impact on Operations: This project may require a change in the type and frequency of maintenance as well as increasing landscape and irrigation. It will also reduce existing time for set up and take down of equipment for special events. C8 Project Location: 12505 Cultural Center Drive Est Construction Start/End: 08/2017-10/2017 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Elisa Cox Project Number: 1L Key: 1895 Object: 5650 Cultural Center - Loading Bay V P CNVflCNBI YJ� � V [� ,I�E,w�; ' w clo AL Nrewo� 5 �,II °JU VICTORIA A ENS ULNRAL J 1TERt�PAU 51MEL• ��' wNO J� 51 NN U.t jagy vEMsp'L`rR:l-V? sA L2l I I- VI T fl N PROJECT LOCATION a W a s Description: This project involves the design to cover a portion of the Service/Loading gay at the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center. justification: Unlike most venues who produce theatre productions, the Lewis Family Playhouse was built without a shop space, therefore requiring technical/carpentry staff to work outside in the loading bay when set pieces and prop items need to be built for a production. There is no shelter to protect the staff or the items being constructed from inclement weather. Currently much of the Playhouse's set construction is contracted out to a commercial shop, which increases costs significantly. Having a sheltered area outside of the stage doors would allow the tech staff better working conditions for these construction projects than simply working outside in the often unpleasant or sometimes unsafe elements. Project Cast Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 so $0 $o $o Design/Plan Review $0 $40,000 $o $o $o $0 $40,000 Right -of -Way So so 5o 5o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $175,000 s0 $0 s0 $175,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $0 $0 so s0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0 Total Costs: $0 $40,000 $175,000 So So $0 $215,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Park Development Fund (120) $0 $40.000 $175,000 $0 So $0 S215,000 Total Costs; $0 s40,000 $175,000 5o $0 $0 5215,000 Impact on operations: Improvements will require maintenance of the structure and added light fixtures, as well as minimal electric cost for light useage. The City could save substantial funds by building some sets internally C9 Project Location: Central Park, Archibald Library, and Corporate yard Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 - 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: City Manager's Offfice/Public Works Services Project Manager: Deborah Allen & Ty Quaintance Project Number. A Key: 1975 Object: 5650 Energy Efficiency Facility Improvements f. >fe�y �* . IF OJECC CATIONS r �I f'-"I.r� iae1r_i j„a};l� �' 3s�•_a. a� Description: Replace existing high pressure sodium lighting fixtures at Central Park and Archibald Library with new energy efficient LED lighting fixtures for reduced energy costs. Implement various retrocomissioning tasks (HVAC, Heat Pumps) at Central Park, Archibald Library, and Corporate yard. These measures are currently eligible for SCE customized incentives ($14,507). Justification: These energy efficient improvements were identified in recent energy audits as having maximum return on investments. LED lighting fixtures have a longer service life along with lower maintenance and energy costs. The retrocommisioning tasks will optimize the existing equipment and reduce energy costs. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TIED TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 s0 50 $0 $o $o $0 Construction $0 $71,390 $0 $0 $0 $o $71,390 Inspection & Administration 50 $o $0 $0 $o $o $0 Contingency $0 5o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $71,390 $0 $0 $0 $o $71,390 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2 17 18 2 18 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve Fund (025) $o $71.390 $0 $o $0 $o $71,390 Total Costs: $o $71,390 $0 $0 $0 $o $71,390 Impact on Operations: The City will realize maintenance savings and Improved lighting while reducing utilitycosts by 2% at each facility. C t0 Project Number: JL Key: 1971 Object: 5650 Fire District - Jersey Station (174) Data Center (Bldg 1) Project Location: Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) and the Fire Maintenance Facility on Jersey Boulevard, Est. Construction Start/End 2017/18-2018/19 Project Status: Design complete and a portion of the building completed Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: i Don Cloughesy/Pamela Pane Description: Data Center built at the Jersey Fire Station/Training Center project. Justification: Provide for redundancy of services to strenghten our City's IS infrastructure and disaster resilency. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020/21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 $0 $0 $0 So Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 50 Construction $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency 50 $0 $0 So 50 $o $0 Total Costs: $O $21500=0 $0 $o So $0 $2,500,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2019 19 2019120 2020 21 TIED TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) so $2,500,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $2,500,000 Total Costs: $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $2,500,000 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance cost will increase. The cost will be better determined after the construction is complete. C 11 Project Location: Behind Jersey Fire Station (174) and the Fire Maintenance Facility on Jersey Boulevard. Est. Construction Start/End: 2015/16 - 2017/18 Project Status: Construction - Phase I and 11 Department: Fire Protection District Project Manager: Chief Cloughesy/Pamela Pane Project Number: J L Key: 1735 Object 5650 Fire District - Jersey Station (174) Training Facility OCATI Description: Phase I and Phase II are under construction. Anticipated substantial completion by February 2018. Justification: A training facility has been part of the Jersey Station Master Plan since its inception. Several multistory hotels have been constructed and additional mid -rise professional offices are proposed in the future necessitating this training tower. It will include expanded classrooms, a live burn building, multi -story training building and other props that will simulate construction features in present and future developments. Will include a Data Center (Phase III) that will provide for redundancy of services to strengthen our City's IS infrastructure. Will also include the FIRE DOC and centralized storage for the District. Other driving forces for this All Risk Training Center are population growth, increased need to train with regional cooperating agencies and provison of a realistic facility our PO parners can utilize for local training and coordination. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $15,990 so $0 $0 s0 $o $15,980 Design/Plan Review $1,653,220 $0 $0 $o s0 So $1,653,220 Construction Management $2,262,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,262,310 Construction $20,983,930 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,009,930 Inspection & Administration $164,440 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $164,440 Contingency $o So $0 $0 So $o $0 Total Costs: $25,079,980 $25,000 $0 $o $0 s0 $25,104,880 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects(288) $25,073,030 $25,000 $0 s0 $0 s0 $25,098,030 Total Costs: $25,073,030 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $25,098,030 Impact on Operations: Fire District operations and maintenance cost will increase. The cost will be better determined after the construction is complete. Opportunities may exist for regional partnerships that could help effect operational costs. C, 12 Fire District - San Bernardino Project Location: At the northwest corner of San Bernardino Road and Vineyard Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 2017/18 - 2018/19 Project Number: JL Key: 1733 Object: 5650 ROJECT LOCATION C Project status: W Contracting an Architect and i a Construction Manager u i _ o Department: >: coop Fire Protection District — � �- i Project Manager: Chief Don Cloughesy/Pamela Pane Description: New Fire Station construction at a new location, to include a Police substation. Property has already been acquired for this new site location. Justification: Rebuilding and relocating a 50. year old fire station. This station serves the southwestern portion of the Rancho Cucamonga community. Project Cost Estimate 1$): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $30,000 s0 s0 $0 $0 $30,000 Design/Plan Review $699,000 $501000 $0 so $0 $0 $739.000 Land Acquisition $2,596.420 $0 $o $0 $o $0 $2,596,420 Construction $101,460 $8,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8.901,460 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 s0 s0 $0 $0 $o Construction Management $0 $640,000 $0 s0 so $0 $640,000 Total Costs: $3,386,980 $9,420,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $12,806,880 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TM2 TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $3,386,980 $9,420,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,806,880 Total Costs: $3,386,880 $9,420,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,806,880 Impact on Operations: No additional personnel costs - current San Bernardino Station personnel will move to the new station when complete. Larger station design could create an increase in maintenance costs, but greater efficiency in station equipment could make it a wash. C13 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5607 Fire District - Water Conservation Landscaping and Emgergency Vehicle Circulation Driveway Improvements Project Location: Banyan Fire Station (175) <NAFF COLLIQ Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017-06/2018 Los oe W Mica Project Status: - `o nwr,uvwr Design - Q a�"` �" n n Ky Department: LOCA ! eox.y Fire Protection District L - e FY L �uanrrF nx:c Project Manager: Chief Cloughesy/Pam Pane ,1, Y-� �"H"A.SII'l �U (1� q fFi9 Description: Removal of high water use turf and replace with drought tolerant landscape plant materials with drip system retrofit. This includes hardscape improvements for vehicular circulation and perimeter gate/fencing modification. This will enhance parking as well as protection of vehicles from sun exposure and provide more direct paths for emergency vehicles to leave the property reducing the amount of turnout time. Justification: Executive order from the State of California to take measures to reduce water consumption. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so so So s0 So $0 $o Design/Plan Review $166,350 s0 So So $0 $0 5166,350 Right -of -Way $0 $0 so $0 $0 $0 50 Construction $15,760 5600,000 $0 $0 $0 5615,760 Inspection & Administration So $0 So $o 5o So $o Contingency So $0 So so so $0 $0 Total Costs: $192,110 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $782,110 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Fund (288) $182,110 S600,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $782,110 Total Costs: $192,110 $600,000 $o So $0 So $782,110 Impact on Operations: Decrease in maintenance and operations. Will not know the full impact until we have a design. C14 Project Location: Public Works Services Center Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Neil Plummer Project Number: 1L Key: 1927 Object: 5650 Public Works Services Department - Warehouse Expansion �U 1 DROJECT LOCATION Description: Construct second warehouse similar in size to original warehouse. Notable difference is that the second warehouse will have solar panels on the roof. Justification: The original warehouse has reached capacity. Public Works equipment and supplies must be stored in cargo containers. Staff has had to operate equipment within the containers (using extension cords for power). Likewise, even locked, the containers are not very secure (they have been broken into several times). The additional storage capacity provided by the new warehouse can be used by all city departments. The most notable use will be providing a home for the Animal Shelter's kitten nursery. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TED TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $170,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $170,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $1,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,750,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $200,000 $0 SO $0 $0 $200,000 Contingency $0 $190,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $190,000 Total Costs: $170,000 $2,140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,310,000 Project Funding: Funding, Source Prior years 2017 18 201811 201912 202012 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $170,000 $2,140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,310,000 Total Costs: $170,000 $2,140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,310,000 Impact on Operations: A second warehouse would put equipment and supplies (currently scattered among multiple containers) into a centralized location. C15 Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5607 Sports Complex - Removal of Soccer Field Lighting Fixtures and Poles at Goals Site Project Location: Sports Complex Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Andy Miller waaCtKlQU �ULT OwT.CWeLC% sewwa:un� PROJECT LOC ION we •rxrw� we axownaw wtxw • i k s p' Description: Remove and salvage existing soccer field light fixtures and associated light Poles from the site of the new Goals Soccer Complex. Justification: Goals Soccer Complex is to be constructed on site of existing soccer field. As a result, existing sports lighting for the soccer field is no longer needed. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $o $o $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 5o $0 $0 So $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $o So 50 $0 Construction $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 s0 $60,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 So $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,000 Project Funding Funding Source Prior Years 2 7 201 19 201 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL LIVID 1(130) $0 $30,000 $0 50 So s0 $30,000 PD 85 (848) $0 $30,000 $0 $0 50 $0 $30,000 Total Costs: $O $60,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $60,ODO Impact on operations: With existing soccer field replaced by Goals Soccer Complex and existing field lights/poles removed, City staff will no longer need to maintain site. Lights and poles will be stored at the Public Works Services Center until they can be used (as needed) in other parks such as Old Town Park (fixtures). C16 Miscellaneous Miscellaneous projects are the capital undertakings that do not qualify for classification into the other project categories. These are often one-time projects that are prompted by factors such as: - State or Federal Mandates - Community Health and Safety Issues - Council Goals and Priorities - Regional Needs Assessments - Interagency Agreements - External Funding Arrangements These projects may or may not have maintenance obligations and they are typically funded from a variety of special funding sources; they are rarely funded via the General Fund. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 9th St along north side west of Vineyard $ 133,800 Ave - Sidewalk Improvements 2 ADA Ramps at Various Locations 3 Arrow Rte and Rochester Ave, North East Comer - Animal Exercise Yard Improvements 4 Community Trail Drainage Improvements 5 Green Bike Lanes & Safety Enhancements 6 Pacific Electric Trail - Block Wall East of Victoria 7 Paseo Lighting Retrofit 8 Southwest Cucamonga Class I Bike Trail Project $ 100,000 $ 80,000 $ 10,500 $ 725,500 $ 13,200 $ 290,000 $ 621,160 $ 1,974,160 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 <on oM $10,500 ■LMD1 Park Development ■ A82766 ■ Safe Routes to School $1,346,660 ■ Citywide Infrastructure ■ Measure I ■LMD2 D Project Number: 800-2012-20 A Key: 1808 Object: 5650 9th Street, North side, West of Vineyard Avenue - Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: 9th Street, North side, From 100 feet west of Vineyard Avenue to 800 feet west of Vineyard Avenue. BEAR Est. Construction Start/End 01/2018 - 02/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings PROJECT Description: Project to construct 700' of sidewalk on the north side of 9th Street. Justification: To provide students a safe and direct route walking to and from school. The goal of this project is to reduce the need for bus services and benefits will be measured by student surveys taken both before and after the project. The City was awarded a federal Safe Routes To School grant to fund 75%of the project construction costs. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $7,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,850 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $107,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $107,800 Inspection & Administration $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Contingency $0 $11,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,000 Total Costs: $7,850 $133,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,650 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure (198) $7,850 $43,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,850 Safe Route School Fund (234) $0 $90,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,800 Total Costs: $7,950 $133,800 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,650 Impact on Operations: Reduction in parkway maintenance costs D1 Project Number: JL Key: 1150 Object: 5650 ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project Location: Various locations City Wide Est. Construction start/End: 02/2018 - 04/2018 Project status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: Construct ADA compliant ramps at various locations citywide. Locations for ramp installations come from the ADA Transition Plan, which is updated annually. This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues that cannot be incorporated into other improvement projects, but still must be addressed in a timely fashion, Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and required by law Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 21 TRD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $o $o $0 $o $o Right -of -Way $o $o $0 $o $0 $o 50 Construction $200,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $0 $560,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 5o $o $0 Contingency $0 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $40,OW Total Costs: $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,OW $0 $600,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TOD TOTAL Measure l Fund(177) $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $600,000 Total Costs: $200,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $0 $6W,000 Impact on Operations: None D2 Project Number: 800-2017-19 J L Key: 1955 Object: 5650 Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, North East Corner - Animal Exercise Yard Improvements Project Location: Arrow Route and Rochester Avenue, North East Corner - Animal Exercise yard Improvements Est Construction Start/End TBD Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings -Al� L�J f ^J 2 J % T �/ `MIFFINNIUMF.i �-- EP ICENT A/SPORTS CJ� PLE% RANCHO CDCAM AD D TS ORTB COMPLEX U K:e ENNY-O RC ANIMAL CARE a. ADOP IO --�ARRO W_RTE e f3 N PROJECT LOCATION iESTATIO M / 174 > AL N .� Description: This project will install 850 linear feet of chain link fencing and gates for a animal exercise yard associated with the Rancho Cucamonga Animal Care Center. Justification: The fencing improvements will provide three chain link fenced enclosures to exercise animals housed at the nearby animal care center. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019120 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 90 $0 $0 50 So $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 90 $0 $0 so $o Right -of -Way So $0 So so $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $80,000 so $o so $0 S80,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 90 Contingency so $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 Total Costs; so $80,000 s0 So $0 $0 $80,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Park Development Fund (120) $0 $80,000 s0 so $0 so S80,000 Total Costs: $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S80,000 Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs to a 1 acre portion of the 2-1/2 acre parcel and add refuse collection costs. D3 Project Number: JL Key: Object: 5607 Community Trail Drainage Improvements Project Location: Hermosa Avenue N/O Banyan Street plus Almond Trail & Laramie GF sites. Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017-06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rodia Description: Install 1,200 square feet of Flatwork on Hermosa Ave n/o Banyan Street to direct water runoff and eliminate soil erosion at this location. Install 175 linear feet of water bars on Almond Trail and Laramie GF sites to eliminate soil erosion and direct water Rows away from the trail. Justification: Flatwork and water bars will stop erosion/wash outs at these sites. This will reduce liability impacts by minimizing potential hazards. Project Cost Estimate ($): Ezoenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 50 $0 50 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 50 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $10,500 $0 $0 So $0 $101500 Inspection & Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Contingency $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,s00 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 202012 TBD TOTAL LMD 1 (130) $0 510,s0o $0 $0 $0 50 $10,500 Total Costs: $0 $10,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 510,500 Impact on Operations: New flatwork and water ban will reduce erosion/wash outs. As a result, reduced maintenance needed at those sites. Reduce liability from potential hazards. D4 Project Number: Object: Green Bike Lanes & Safety Enhancements Limits to Milliken Avenue; Foothill Boulevard from Westerly City - andWWI Limits to Haven Avenue, 1 rL 1'iT�Le`fPacific Electric (PE) Trail 1 R11'"unut,ria�`�r3 PJEf4L",i �itirlt�i'"' y.`,�n�� Est. Construction Start/End- IfI j' 11 10/2019 IW1 MIS "I I. Projectstatus: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Description: Enhance Existing Class It Bike Lanes an approximate 2.6-mile segment of existing Class II bicycle lanes along Base Line Road and Foothill Boulevard. Installation of Safety Enhancements along approximately 7-mile segment of the PE Trail in order to Increase motorist yielding. Public Outreach and Education element designed to encourage and promote alternatives to motorized transportation. Justification: This project is funded by the Clean Transportation Funding Grant from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Revie Committee (MSRC) Contract Number ML14070, helping to reduce vehicle emissions in the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Education Outreach $5,000 $0 55,000 $0 SO $0 510,000 Design/Plan Review $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 s0 SO $0 $0 $0 Construction SO $600,417 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,417 Inspection & Administration $0 $60,042 $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,042 Contingency SO $60,042 $0 $0 $o $0 $60,042 Total Costs: $5,000 $725,500 $5,000 SO $0 $0 $735,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL AB 2766 Air Qual lmpry Fund(105) SS,o0o $725500 $5,000 $0 So $0 $735,500 Total Costs; $5,000 $725,500 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $735,500 Impact on Operations: This project will add a few miles to the City's street striping maintenance, requiring routine maintenance. Traffic maintenance is anticipated to be impacted with possibility of additional equipment D5 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5607 Pacific Electric Trail - Block Wall E/0 Victoria Park Lane Project Location: s� Pacific Electric Trail east of Victoria Park Lane � I � � n �n4PrF•zFR'". �a ��` �. Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017-06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rodia Description: Justification: MI. OP ON Install missing section of block wall at end of the paseo (VW-6) located between Atwood Street and Farrington Street, along the Pacific Electric Trail. This wall will be installed between two existing walls and will conform to City Standard design. Residents are concerned about the continual use and private property access, along with the potential of injury due to sloped conditions. Site has temporary K-rail installed. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $1,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200 Total Costs: $0 $13,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,200 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL LMD 2 Victoria (131) $0 $13,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,200 Total Costs: $0 $13,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,200 Impact on Operations: Once block wall is constructed, the need for staff operations in area will be minimized, private property access eliminated and risk of injury reduced. a Project Number: A Key: 1716 Object: 5650 y Palseol Lighting Retrofit Project Location: 2v (( I? l l�nnKl�,e.un, r=�,rc—snn/sytnioS.�eI f�s LMD2 I ) �+ /I GRAPELANO ELEMENTARY Est. Constmction Start/End: 07/2017-06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rod,a Description: Replace existing light fixtures, poles, wire, and underground connections in pawn VW-2, Victoria Park lane west to Etiwanda Avenue and north of Dunmore Place, with new energy efficient LED light fixtures for better security and reduced energy costs. This is a single year project for this location, but other areas have been identified. Justification: LED lighting fixtures have a longer service life along with lower maintenance and energy requirements. The current system in this area has had many failures due to deteriorated wire runs and declining integrity of the existing fixtures. Maintenance to keep these existing lights up and running has increased to meet the constant concerns of the residents located around this location. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2017 18 2 18 1 2019 2 2020 21 TED TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 so so so so so So Design/Plan Review $0 so so s0 $0 so 50 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o so so so $0 Construction $0 $261,000 $0 so $0 s0 5261,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $o $0 $0 so so Contingency $0 $29,000 $0 s0 $0 so $2%000 Total Costs: s0 $290,000 so So so so $290,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2 71 201819 2019 202 2 TBD TOTAL LMD 2 Vittoria (131) $0 $290,000 so $0 $0 so $290,OD0 Total Costs: $0 $290,000 $0 $0 $0 So $290,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced maintenance labor and cost, while reducing utility costs by 3096 in this area D7 Project Number: jL Key: 1953 Object: 5650 Southwest Cucamonga Class I Bike Trail Project Project Location: rf�irr�• +m+^g Cucamonga Creek Channel from a *� i e5 ew "oa ce"9e Foothill Boulevard to 4[h Street r. ° I � a 6. e u 1� and Deer Creek Channel from .�.r' a Church Street to 4th Street ,. , lea i"""". � . e _ � or x •"ro t• nw 4°T_C.._..''" M Est. Construction Start/End: 10/2016 - 10/2019 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Description: Construction of approximately 2.46 miles (12, 990 LF) of Class I shared -use path improvements along the Cucamonga Creek Channel from Foothill Boulevard to 4th Street. Construction of 1.85 miles (9,750 LF) along the Deer Creek Channel shared -use path from Church Street to 4th Street, Public Outreach and Education element designed to encourage and promote alternatives to motorized transportation. Justification: Clean Transportation Funding Grant from the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Revie Committee (MSRC) Contract Number ML16052, helping to reduce vehicle emissions in the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Education Outreach $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Design/Plan Review $5,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 50 $15,000 Right -of -Way $o $o $o $o $0 $o Sp Construction 50 $505,133 $0 $0 $0 $0 $505,133 Inspection & Administration $0 $50.513 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,513 Contingency $0 $50,513 $o $0 $0 $0 $50,513 Total Costs: $10,000 $621,160 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $636,160 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL AB 2766 Air Qual lmpry Fund(105) $10,000 $621,160 $5.Wo $0 $0 $0 $636,160 Total Costs: $10,000 $621,160 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $636,160 Impact on Operations: None a Municipal Utility The Rancho Cucamonga Nfunicipal Utility (RCNfU) was forted by the City Council in 2001. RCivfU served its first customers in 2003 and finished construction of the Victoria Arbors substation in 2004. Currently, RCMU services over 900 customers in its service area. Annually, more than 78,000 megawatt-hoursof electricity are distributed to our customers via 20 circuit miles of wire spread across the roughly 4-square miles of service territory. RCMU's historical peak demand is 17.5 megawatts, set in August 2011. RCMU capital projects are related to the maintenance, expansion and improvement of the RCMU distribution system. RCMU's distribution system was designed to minimize maintenance and operating costs and ensure maximum reliability of service. Proiect List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 6th Street from Utica Avenue to The Vine $ 885,000 - Electric Line Extension 2 Citywide Safety Light LED Retrofit $ 389,200 3 Citywide Street Light Acquisition $ 9,779,290 4 Citywide Street Light LED Retrofit $ 4,121,440 5 Commercial Smart Meter Replacement $ 100,000 6 Haven Avenue at 6th St - Street Light $ 25,000 Installation 7 Haven Ave from Foothill Blvd to Church $ 1,045,000 Street - Electric Line Extension 8 Rancho Cucamonga Fiber Optics $ 2,050,000 Network 9 Utica Ave from 4th Street to 6th Street - $ 800,000 Electric Line Extension $ 19,194,930 Sources of Fundine for FY 2017-18 $460,000 $2,441,200 $2,050,000 ■ fiber Optic Network ■ SLD 2 ■ SLD 4 ■ SLD 6 SLD 8 ■ Municipal Utility $4,25S,000 $4,632,010 ■SLD 1 ■ SLD 3 ■SLD5 ■ SLD 7 ■ Fire Capital Projects Project Number: J L Key: 1967 Object: 5650 6th Street from Utica Avenue to The Vine - Electric Line Extension Project location: RCMU Electric Line Extension - 6th Street from Utica Avenue to The Vine Est. Construction Start/End: 05/2018 - 01/2019 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn J STA 07 OJEC LOCATI N "s L Description: Extend approximately 2,500' of Distribution Line Extension (trench and cabling) from the corner of Sixth street and Utica Avenue to The Vine and Cabling service south of the Vine to service The Resort (Empire Lakes) with RCMU electricity and Fiber Conduit. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to a new commercial development shopping center. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category, Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 $o $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review 50 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $5,000 Right -of -Way So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $800,000 $200,000 $0 $o $o $1,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $80,000 $20,000 So $0 So $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $885,000 $220,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,105,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility (Fund 705) $0 $885,000 $220,000 $0 $0 So $1,105,000 Total Costs: $0 S885,000 $220,000 $0 So $o $11105,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E1 Project Number: JL Key: 1974 Object: 5650 Citywide Safety Light LED Retrofit Project Location: 'a a 3,081 citywide safety lights in city lighted intersections Est. Construction Start/End: July 1, 2017 Project Status: Design/Pre-Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description: in The City has 1,081 safety lights at citywide intersections and 31 bridge lights that it owns and maintains. The retrofit of these existing HPS lights to LED will allow the City's SLD's to realize maintenance savings, additional energy savings and cost savings to the City. Justification: SCE's rebate incentive is slated to be discontinued at the end of 2017. The expected rebate amount for the LED incentive will be around $117,426. The retrofit of the existing LED Safety lights will realize maintenance savings, additional energy savings and cost savings to the City's SLDs. Project Cost Estimate j$j: Expenditure/Category Prior Years 201711 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 $0 $o $o Design/Plan Review So $0 So $o $o so $0 Right -of -Way So $0 $0 $o $o $o $0 Construction $0 $389,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $389,200 Inspection 8 Administration $0 so so s0 so so $o Contingency So so so so $o $o so Total Costs: s0 $399,200 $0 $0 $0 $0 $399,200 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL SLD 1 (151) $0 5389,200 So $0 $0 $o $389,200 Total Costs: $0 $389,200 $0 $0 So $0 $389,200 Impact on Operatlons: The City will realize maintenace savings and better lighting, as well as energy efficiency through the use of new LED technologies and savings to the City's SLDs. •Interfund Loan from Capital Reserves Fund 025 E2 Project Location: 15,260 Streetlights will be acquued from SCE via a Purchase and Sale Agreement Est. Construction Start/End: July 1, 2017 Project Status: Pre -Acquisition Department Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description: Citywide Street Light Acquisition Project Number: JL Key: 1%9 Object: 5650 9 The City Council approved a Purchase and Sale agreement with SCE for the acquisition of 15,260 streetlights citywide. The ownership transition is expected to occur at or acrund 7/1/2017, depending an haw long it take for the CPUC to approve SCE's filing. Justification: Advantages of acquiring the streetlights: 1) Reduced street light costs and expenditures Induced LS-2 rate), 2) Improved system maintenance and reliability, 3) Local control of streetlight assets, 6) Improved customer service, 5) Future LED: Maintenance savings & additional energy savings, 6) Future opportunities —'Smart City" Project Cost Estimate ($j: Expenditure/Categary Prior Years 2017/18 2019119 20 9 0 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NP DES $0 50 5o So $0 $0 50 Design/Plan Review $1D,000 so 50 50 5o W $10,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 50 $o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $9,629,290 So $0 $0 $0 59.629.290 Inspection & Administration $0 $5Q000 $0 5o so So 5501000 Contingency $0 $100.000 $0 $o $0 So 51oo.D0o Total Cosa: $10.000 59,779,290 $0 5o SD $0 59.189.2% Project Funding: Funding Sours Prior Years 2017/18 201811 2019/20 2020121 im TOTAL SLD 1(151) 50 52,701,720 so 50 $o $o S4701,120 SLID 2(152) $o $3,237,210 5o so $0 so $3,237,210 SLD3(153) $0 $1,245.870 50 50 $0 5o 51,245,970 SLD 4(254) $0 $648,960 50 $0 $0 5o S6a&a60 SLD 5 (155) $o $283,380 $0 50 $0 s0 $283,380 SLD 6(156) So S439,760 So $0 $0 $0 $439.760 SLD 71157) $0 $901,850 50 $D $0 s0 5901AW SLD 8(158) $0 $321,040 so $0 $0 $0 5321,040 Total Cobb: $0 $9,7M,290 $0 50 $0 s0 $9.779,290 The City will realize maintenance savings and better lighting, as well as energy efficiency through the use of new Impect on Operations' LED technologies and savings to the City's SLDs. 'Interfund Loan from Capital Reserves Fund 025 E3 Project Location: 14,780 street lights citywide Est. Construction Stort/End: July 1, 2017 Project Status: Design/Pre-Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager. Fred Lyn Project Number: JL Key: 1973 Object: 5650 Citywide Street Light LED Retrofit 9 Description: The City has approximately 14,780 High Pressure Sodium (HPS) street lights citywide that it will own and maintain once the SCE purchase has been approved by the CPUC. RCMU also currently owns & maintains 168 HP5 street lights as well. The retrofit of these existing HPS lights to LED lights will allow the City's SLD's to realize maintenance savings, additional energy savings and cost savings to the City. Justification: SCE's rebate incentive is slated to be discontinued at the end of 2017. The expected rebate amount for the LED incentive will be around $1.15 million. The retrofit of these existing lights to LED lights will realize maintenance savings, additional energy savings and cost savings to the City's SLDs (1-7). SLD 8 is already on LEDs. Project Cost Estimate (S) Expenditure/Categpry Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 7BD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So so So $0 So $0 so Design/Plan Review, so $0 So $o so $0 so Right -of -Way $0 50 So 5o so 50 50 Construction $0 54,121,440 $0 50 So W $4,121,440 Inspection & Administration So so so s0 50 $0 $0 Contingency So So $0 5o So So So Total Costs: So $4,121,440 $0 So $0 s0 $4.121.440 project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2017 18 201811 201912 2020121 TBD TOTAL SLD 1(151) so $1.164,080 50 5o So So 51,164,080 SLD 2 (1S2) $o 53,394,800 $0 $o So so 51.394,800 SLD 3 (153) So 5536,800 $o So So So $536,800 SLD 4(154) $o $279,400 so So So So $279,400 SU)5(15S) $0 $122,100 5o so So $o $122,100 SLD6(156) $0 $189,480 $o So So s0 $199,490 SLD 7 (157) $0 $388,580 $0 $o $0 so 5388,580 Municipal Utility (705) So 546,200 $o So $0 $0 S46.200 Total Costs: So 54,121,440 $o $0 so $o 54,121,440 The City will realize maintenace savings and better lighting, as well as energy efficiency through the use of new LED Impact on Operations: technologies and savings to the City's SLOB. 'Interfund Loan from Capital Reserves Fund 025 E4 Project Location: Various locations throughout the RCMU Service Area where electric meters are located Est. Construction Start/End: 4/1/17-12/30/17 Project Status: Deployment Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description: Project Number: A Key: 1938 Object 5650 Commercial Smart Meter Replacement ns 9) Approximately 600 old commercial electric meters will be replaced with new 2 way ERT "smart" meters, which allows RCMU the ability to pick up reads and connect/reconnect meters remotely from City Hall offices. Justification: The meter technology that is being currently used is over 30 years old. Though there is nothing wrong with the existing meters, it still requires that a meter technician go out and probe the meter to download the data. A significant amount of time and labor is involved in this effort. A lot of utilities are switching over to this new AMI (2 way meter) for the ease of meter reading and local control of reconnecting and disconnecting meters. Utilizing this new method could potentially save RCMU money in metering reading expenditures. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TRD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review SO $0 $0 5o $o $0 $o Right -of -Way $0 $o $o $o $o $0 SO Construction $375.000 $100,000 5250,000 $0 So $0 $725,000 Inspection & Administration $0 So $0 $o $o $o $o Contingency $0 $o $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Total Cods: $375,000 $100.000 $250,000 $0 $0 $o $725,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility (Fund 70S) $375,000 $100,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $725,000 Total Costs: $375,000 $100,000 $250,000 SO $0 $o $725.000 Impact on Operations: The potential to bring meter reading and reconnect/disconnects in house will significantly reduce expenditures on existing contract meter reading services. E5 Project Number: 1 L Key: 1948 Object: 5650 Haven Avenue at Sixth Street - Street Light Installation Project Location: i Haven Avenue at Sixth Street ��J �J�--� ews Est. Construction Start/End 0712016 - 08/2016 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description: Installation of 3 new streetlights as part of the new planned Residence Inn's street improvements. Justification: 3 new streetlights will need to be installed as part of the Street Improvements required for the planned Residence Inn on the corner of Haven Avenue and Sixth Street. RCMU is the electricity provider to this site. Project Cost Estimate j$) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TOD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $o 50 $0 $0 So $0 Design/Plan Review $o $0 90 $o $0 $0 $o Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $o 50 $0 $0 Construction $o $25,000 $o $o $0 $0 $25,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 5o 50 Contingency $o $0 $o $0 So $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $o $0 So $0 $25,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TRD TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU E6 Project Number: 1L Key: 1966 Object: 5650 Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Church Street - Electric Line Extension Project Location: RCMU Electric Line Extension - Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulvard to Church Street Est Construction Start/End: 07/2017 - 10/2017 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering, Fire District Project Manager: Fred Lyn, Pamela Pane v t \� N- u.. Pi PRgJ T LOCATION. C Description: Extend approximately 2,500' of Distribution Line Extension (trench and cabling) and fiber conduit extension from the corner of Haven Avenue and Foothill Boulvard to the Deer Creek Channel and Church Street and to the intersection of Town Center/Terra Vista to service a new Residential development and the future RCFD Station 8 with RCMU electricity and City fiber. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to a new commercial development shopping center. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TSD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o So so $o $0 so so Design/Plan Review $0 $5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Right -of -Way $0 $o $o $0 $o $0 $0 Construction so $970,000 $0 $0 so $0 $970,000 Inspection & Administration $0 So 50 $o So So $0 Contingency $0 $70,000 $0 SO $0 So $70,000 Total Costs: $o $1,045,000 $0 $0 $0 $D $1,045,000 Project Funding Fundina Source Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility (Fund 705) $0 S585,000 SO $0 SO $0 $$85,000 Fire Capital Project (Fund 288) $0 $460,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $460000 Total Costs: s0 $1,045,000 $0 $o So $0 $1,065,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E7 Project Location: Various locations throughout the City where existing fiber optics conduits are located Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project5tatus: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Project Number: JLKey: 1910 Object: 5650 Rancho Cucamonga Fiber Optic Network 9 Description: Phase 1 completion of the Fiber Optic master plan by Magellan Advisors in February 2017 resulted in the recommendation that the City's provide the next steps in utilizing the existing fiber optics system towards network buildout using both existing traffic conduit and building a new network to -tie-in- existing segments in order to provide municipal broadband to commercial and industrial areas throughout the City. Justification: Now is the time to consider laying the groundwork regarding Broadband opportunities and RCMU. Providing fiber optics broadband to commercial customers is a business opportunity that we are missing because we have not been systemic enough in our approach over the past few years. Completing a report on all our dark fiber so we can start looking at how we could monetize that asset and selling broadband as a commodity would fit well with the Smart City initiative, as well as promote a high tech economy and economic development within the City. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 5o $0 $0 $o $0 Design/Plan Review $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Right -Of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $2,000.000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 52,000,000 $101000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $50,000 $0 so $0 $o $50,000 Contingency $0 So $0 $0 $o $0 So Total Costs: $85000 $2,050,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,135,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility (Fund 705) $85,000 $0 $0 SO $o $0 $85,000 Fiber Optic Network (Fund 711) $0 $2,050,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $10,050,000 Total Costs: $85,000 $2,050,000 $2,000,000 52,000,000 52,000,000 52.000,000 $10,135,000 Impact on Operations: The potential to bring in high speed broadband as a commodity will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E8 Project Number: JL Key: 1968 Object: 5650 Utica Avenue from 4th Street to 6th Street - Electric Line Extension Project location: AlaI u -. RCMU Electric Line Extension Utica Avenue from 4th Street to I`�II 6th Street I PROJECT LOCATION 07/2017?ru01/2018tart/End: ' } 11 7 Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description Approximately 2,200' of Distribution Line Extension to service a new planned commercial development (4 large parcels) on the NWC and NEC of Utica Avenue and Fourth Street and the future corner of Haven Avenue and Fourth Street with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service to a new commercial development shopping center. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate ($1: Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 s0 $0 $o so $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 so $0 $0 $0 S10,000 Right -of -Way so $0 s0 so $0 s0 $0 Construction $0 $800.000 s0 So $0 $0 $800,000 Inspection &Administration s0 $0 so $0 s0 $0 s0 Contingency s0 so so $0 s0 $0 so Total Costs: $10,000 S800,000 so so $o so S810,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $10,000 58001000 $0 $o $o $0 S810,000 Total Costs: $10,Doo S800,o00 So $0 $o So S810,000 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU. E9 Parks Any capital project that is located in, on, or adjacent to a park or community center facility is classified as a Park Project. These include the construction of new park facilities, as well as the expansion or rehabilitation of existing park facilities. Improvements include playing fields, play ground equipment, park landscaping, other miscellaneous recreational amenities, restroom facilities and parking lot improvements. Many of these projects require ongoing maintenance, and all field rehabilitation projects and renovations are performed on an annual or biannual basis due to extensive wear from local league play. The majority of Park Projects are funded via the Park Development Fund (120), which is collected via residential development fees (i.e. new single family, town home, condo and senior housing). Some projects qualify for grants and Special District funds. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 Central Park - Phase II Design Study $ 250,000 2 Central Park - Trail Head Improvements 3 Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II q Heritage Park - Handicap Parking Stalls and Pavement Rehabilitation 5 Rubberized Surface Replacement 180,890 538,000 110,000 S 15,000 $ 1,093,890 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $15,000 $55,000 IF $1,023,890 ■ Captial Reserve ■ PD 85 Park Development ■ LMD 9 Central Park - Phase II Design Study Project Location: 11200 Base Lne Road Est. Design Start/End: 07/2017 - 1012017 Project Status: Environmental/NPDES Department: Community Services Project Manager: Michelle Keith Project Number: 1L Key: 1660 Object: 5650 Description: This is to update the conceptual plans for Central Park so the City can continue to pursue funding opportunities for future park development. Given the history of fluctuating economic conditions, redirecting the Central Park Master Plan from large 20— 30 acre per phase projects into smaller 5 —10 acre phased elements will likely provide more funding opportunities. A new public outreach and design process will create an up-to-date plan to guide staff when funding is identified. This will also fund the required Envrionment Review Report. Justification: There is approximately 70 acres of undeveloped parkland at Central Park. The prior Master Plan needs to be updated taking into consideration the loss of the Redevelopment Agency, construction costs and ongoing maintenance and programming costs of any future improvements. Furthermore, elements of the original Master Plan like the aquatics center, gym, and fire station are either no longer feasible or required. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateaory Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o 5o Design/Plan Review $130,000 $250.000 $0 $0 So 5o $380,000 Right-of-way $0 so $o $0 $0 50 So Construction $o So So $o so 50 $0 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 50 50 $o Contingency $o $0 $0 $0 5o So $0 Total Costs: $130,000 $250,000 $0 $0 5o So $380,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Park Development(120) $130,000 $250,000 $0 $0 50 5o $380,000 Total Costs: Impact an Operations: S130,000 $250.000 $0 $0 $0 $o S380,000 Completion of this project could possibly add new amenities to the City's inventory which will require operational expenditures for maintenance, staffing, overhead and utilities. F1 Project location: 11200 Base Line Road Est. Construction Start/End: 08/2017-0112017 Project Status: Design Department: Community Services Project Manager: Michelle Keith Description: Justification: Project Number: 1L Key: 1871 Object: 5650 Central Park - Trail Head Improvements This project will provide the next phase of development for Central Park, which will Include the design for approximately 2.5 acres north of the interior road, between the PE Trail and the Community Center. Included will be additional parking and a restroom facility for trail users. Responds to requests from residents for further improvements to Central Park and provides ADA accessibility between the Community Center and the PE Trail. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $0 $o $o $0 Design/Plan Review $14.030 $180,890 $0 $0 $0 $o $194,920 Right-of-way $o $o $0 $0 $o $o $o Construction $0 $0 $1,530,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,530,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $55,000 $0 50 $0 $55,000 Contingency so $0 $305,000 $0 $0 $0 $305,000 Total Costs: $14,030 $180,890 $1,890,000 so $0 $0 $2,094,920 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Park Development(120) $14,030 $180,890 51,890,000 $0 $o $0 $2,094,920 Total Costs: $14,030 $1go,890 $1,890,000 $o $0 $0 $2,084,920 Impact on Operations: This project, will require maintenance such as cleaning and replacing any damaged portions of the equipment, as well as landscape irrigation and maintenance as needed. F2 Project Number: A Key: 1664 Object: 5650 Etiwanda Creek Park - Phase II Project Location: 5939 East Avenue Est. Design 5tart/End: 10/2016-01/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Community Services/Parks Project Manager: Michelle Keith Description: - � CTMYIO. CYLpiT CL[YCNLNY o4e r :NL IVYMT MTCR DAM IYNI°N N YJ e L. _ d yTgi r 5w. Nau Ynn.eT �,4�l PROJECT LOCATION N u� 6HWJ This project involves the initial design of park expansion, which may include additional athletic/recreation multi -use fields, tennis courts and additional parking. Required environmental and biological studies are also being completed as part of the design. Justification: The City Council identified this project as a goal for Fy2007-08. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $50,000 $o $o $0 5o $0 $50,000 Design/Plan Review $409,230 $538,000 $0 $0 so $o $947,230 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $o $5,390,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $o $o $o so $0 $0 Total Costs: $459,230 $539,000 55,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,377,230 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Park Development(120) $459,230 $538,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,997,230 Total Costs: $459,230 $538,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,997,230 Impact on Operations: Initial estimates place the cost of maintaining two additional fields at $300,000-$450,000 per year F3 Project Number: 800-2017-08 JL Key: 1961 Object: 5650 Heritage Park - Handicap Parking Stalls and Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Heritage Park Est. Construction Start/End 11/2017-12/2017 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David P OJECL�. ION u !✓-.TMEIGA T� e� R a� II�II—/��fl FIRE �:' Hi:R1'RIL1T I (S r Y SW HERITAGE Cr. AMUNITY PARK gZd Q K-SIP rr!ys PItM9 ,7 a +T— P 7< s 'j1 WI SONAV �l yVN � 0 —awdt'f —j If �; �Irnw Ll Description: This capital project encompasses all ADA compliance issues and includes an asphalt concrete mix overlay, cold planing, and utility adjustment. Justification: Meets the City's ongoing commitment to install ADA ramps where they are missing and required by law. This project also will restore the existing pavement surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TED TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 50 $o So So 50 Construction $0 $85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $6,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,500 Contingency $0 $8,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,500 Total Costs: $0 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 201819 201 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Park Development Fund (120) 50 $55,000 $0 $0 So $0 $55,000 PD 85 Redemption Fund (848) $0 $55,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $55,000 Total Costs: $0 $110,000 So $0 $0 $0 $110,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. F4 Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5607 Rubberized Surface Replacement Project Location: `•�� LIVID qy_ J�.-,L��{,E�E,,,.�SUMNYTIN3EI1NCj11A�1EJ 11e1v... Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: I I� Dean Rodia Description: Replace the worn out rubberized surface under exercise equipment. Justification: This will complete the replacement of rubberized surfacing throughout the playground and exercise circuit areas within LMD 9, as well as reduce any current liability issues associated with damaged and deteriorating surfacing. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $0 $0 $0 $0 50 So $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o Construction $o $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,000 Inspection & Administration $o so $0 $o so So $0 Contingency $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $o Total Costs: So 515,000 50 $o $0 $0 $15,0100 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL LMD 9 Lower Etiwanda (139) $o $15,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $15,000 Total Costs: $o $15,000 $o So $0 $0 $15,000 Impact on Operations: Reduce the amount of maintenance needed for repairs and to keep the area safe. F5 Railroad Crossing Railroad Crossings are extremely expensive and infrequent projects, requiring large funding commitments, lengthy construction schedules and inevitably causing some inconvenience to the local community during the construction period. They are, however, also one of the best ways to ensure the safety of drivers, pedestrians and rail users by providing two separate crossings, thereby minimizing the possibility of train versus automobile, or train versus pedestrian accidents. Railroad Crossings are identified in the City's General Plan document, and they are also frequently illustrated in regional planning documents held by the County of San Bernardino, SANBAG and Caltrans. Proiect List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur -New $ 75,000 Concrete Panels 2 Etiwanda Ave Grade Separation @ $ 50,000 Metrolink Tracks $ 125,000 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $75,000 ■ Citywide Infrastructure ■ Gas Tax R & T 7360 G Project Location: Arrow Route at Railroad Spur west of Milliken Avenue Est. Construction Start/End 01/2018 - 03/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Project Number: 800-2017-14 A Key: 1819 Object: 5650 Arrow Route at Railroad Spur - New Concrete Panels y � W jI W I1II F�YS.Tr}1LT- N W b� R � MILL{NNIUM�T ENT RI ACT LOCAON q,13Lg70tyl 1'lc 4pi-mAAcx== Il 7crnMcnxIUf1'fT= It-.SOLVU l 3 a Description: Replace existing uneven rubber panels to concrete panels. Justification: The existing rubber panels are uneven and damaged due to heavy traffic use. Replacing with concrete panels will provide a smoother and will be safer for vehicles. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so $o $0 $0 So $o so Design/Plan Review So $0 $0 So So $o $o Right -of -Way $0 So $0 So 5o So $o Construction $0 560.000 $o So $0 $0 S60,000 Inspection & Administration s0 S9,000 so so s0 $0 $9,000 Contingency So $6,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $6,000 Total Costs: so $75,000 $o so So $0 $75,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax RT7360 Fund (174) 90 $75,000 $0 so So $0 $75,000 Total Costs: $0 $75.000 So s0 50 $0 $75,000 Impact on Operations: Uneven rubber creates damage along the edges of the existing asphalt pavement. This project will reduce maintenance for asphalt replacement. G1 Project Number: 800-2015-25 1L Key: 1922 Object: 5650 Etiwanda Avenue - Grade Separation at Metrolink Tracks Project Location: y Etiwanda Avenue from 6[h Street --¢' - - - to Arrow Route .'4i / „ Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description PROJECT LOCATION- ATV RAl.goAD Prepare preliminary design drawings for a future grade separation on Etiwanda Avenue at the Metrolink Railroad Crossing south of Whitram Avenue. lustlflcallon: This project will improve safety and traffic circulation on Etiwanda Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $o $o s0 So s0 Design/Plan Review $o $50,000 s0 $o $0 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 s0 so s0 $3.500,000 S3,500,000 Construction $0 $0 so so $o $36.000,000 $36,000,0D0 Inspection & Administration $0 $o s0 $0 so $500,000 $500,000 Contingency s0 $0 so $0 So $4,000,000 $4,000,000 Total costs: so $50,000 so $0 so $45,000,000 $45,050,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Infrastructure Fund (198) s0 $50,000 so $0 $0 s0 $50.000 Unknown $0 $0 $o so $o S45,000,000 $45,000,000 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $0 s0 $o $45,000,000 $45,050,000 Impact on Operations: Added maintenance costs for a new bridge will be determined during design phase G2 Streets Streets projects are the most common type of project undertaken by the City. The City receives annual funding from gasoline sales taxes for use on resurfacing projects for local arterial and residential streets in order to extend pavement life and improve driving conditions. Besides street rehabilitation projects, the City also undertakes many widening and extension projects as need dictates via new development, community needs and the City's General Plan. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 6th St from Milliken to Charles Smith - $ 902,000 Pavement Rehabilitation 2 Civic Center and Courthouse Pavement $ 150,000 Rehabilitation 3 Foothill Blvd from Grove Ave to San $ 50,000 Bernardino Rd - Street Improv 4 Foothill Blvd from Haven Ave to Milliken $ 850,000 Ave - Pavement Rehabilitation 5 Hermosa Ave from Arrow to Foothill - $ 250,000 Pavement Rehabilitation 6 Hermosa Ave north of Foothill Blvd to $ 600,000 Church St - Street Widening 7 Highland Ave from Archibald Ave to $ 25,000 Haven Ave - Pavement Rehabilitation 8 Jersey Blvd from Haven to Rochester - $ 850,000 Pavement Rehabilitation 9 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at $ 2,200,000 Various Locations 10 Youngs Canyon Road from Koch Place $ 50,000 to Cherry Ave - Street Extension $ 5,927,000 $1,10 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 <cn nm <1 cn nnn <t mn no0 ■ Road Maint & Rehab ,v Measure ■ Beautification ■ AD 88-2 3,040,D00 ■ Gas Tax R & T 7360 ■ Citywide Infrastructure ■ Fire Capital Projects ■ Law Enforcement Reserve J Project Number; 800-2016-15 R Key: 1930 Object: 5650 6th Street from Milliken Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: 6th Street from Milliken Avenue to Charles Smith Avenue Est Construction Stan/End: 04/2018 - 06/2018 Project Status: Design /Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings LwrdBiitln �atYIIN"N,� /J PI JECT OCATION a z 0 Description: This project involves storm drain, localized asphalt repair, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, video detection signal upgrades, ADA ramp upgrades, utility adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. The project is using asphalt rubber and is approved for a Cal ltecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $0 s0 $0 so $0 Design/Plan Review $o $o So $0 $o $o $o Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 So $o $o $o Construction $0 $803,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $803,000 Inspection & Administration 50 $20,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $20,000 Contingency $0 $79,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,000 Total Costs: $0 $902,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $902,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $500,000 $o $0 $o 50 $50o,o00 City Infrastructure(198) $0 $402,000 $0 $0 $0 50 S402,000 Total Costs: $0 5902,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $902,000 impact on Operations: Reduction of routine maintenance activities for pothole repair, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other needed areas. H1 Project Number: 800-2017-05 R Key: 1959 Object: 5650 Civic Center and Courthouse Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: ��_OYYY1 w 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga-1 Est Construction Start/End: 09/2017 - 11/2017 Project Status Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David and County Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt concrete mix overlay, utility adjustments and pavement striping. San Bernardino County is the lead agency with the City sharing the cost. Justification: This project will restore the existing pavement surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 5120,000 Inspection & Administration So $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,000 Contingency $0 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,01D0 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019120 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Law Enforcement Reserve (017) $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $D $0 $150,000 Total Costs: $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H2 Project Number: 800-2012-29 A Key: 1964 Object 5650 Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road - Street Improvements Project Location: Foothill Boulevard from Grove Avenue to San Bernardino Road Est. construction Start/End: 08/2018 - 10/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings / / �� ,,��rr� Yyt.Ig1LCL,�Kw• P ECT WC 7ION LIE LC r- rre�[rr-• • S i t I Description: This project involves street improvements with curb & gutter, sidewalk, street lights and a potential median island, as well as pavement rehabilitation consisting of cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valve and manhole cover adjustments, and pavement striping, Justification: This project will enhance pedestrian and vehicular safety through the area and restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o So $0 $o 50 $o Design/Plan Review $0 S50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S50,000 Right -of -Way $0 So So So 50 So $0 Construction $0 $0 So So $0 so $0 Inspection & Administration So $0 $0 $0 $o 5o $0 Contingency $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 $50,000 $0 $o So $0 $so,000 Project Funding; Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure(198) $o S50,000 $0 So $o $0 $50,000 Total costs: So $50,000 So So $0 $0 $50,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H3 Project Number: 800-2017-06 JL Key: 1932 Object: 5650 Foothill Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Foothill Boulevard - From Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 05/2018 - 06/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David N C `� pP CT LOC TION crnu RdRaiee sr�noR OR Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability, In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and will be submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Right -of -Way $0 90 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,ppo Inspection & Administration $0 $30,000 So $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Contingency $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $8501000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $50,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Total Costs: Impact on Operations: $50,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. C[! Project Number: 8OD-2017-09 A Key: 1934 Object: 5650 Hermosa Avenue from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard • Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Hermosa Avenue - From Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End 05/2018 - 07/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Spec LED AM, OUR PROJECT LOCAT N Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is approved for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $35,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 Construction $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Inspection & Administration $0 530,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Contingency $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $o $o $20,000 Total Costs: $35,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $285,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $35,000 $250,OW $0 $0 $0 $0 $285,000 Total Costs: 535,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $285,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H5 Project Number: 800-2017.10 1L Key: 1976 Object 56SO Hermosa Avenue north of Foothill Boulevard to Church Street • Street Widening Project Location: Hermosa Avenue from north of Foothill Boulevard to Church Street Est. Construction Start/End 0512018 06/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves street widening, sidewalk and some pavement rehabilitation JECT LOCATION I (I� Justification: This project will improve the traffic circulation and pedestrian safety due to wider road and sidewalks Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateaory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Right -of -Way $0 So $0 $0 $0 5o $o Construction $0 $525,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $525,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $18,000 $o $0 $0 $o $18,000 Contingency $0 $57,000 $0 So $0 $0 $57,000 Total Costs: $0 $600,DD0 $0 $o $o so $600,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 21718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Beautification Fund (110) $0 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,D00 Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $0 $250,000 $0 $a $0 $o $250,000 Total Costs: $0 S6D0,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like weed abatement and repair of existing rock wall, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H6 Project Number: 800-2017•11 A Key: 1960 Object: 5650 Highland Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project location: Highland Avenue Avenue - From Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 08/2018 - 10/2018 Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description Justification: F-1 vuiv-so ,uxiaa max This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and will be submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 202012 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $395,500 $0 $0 So $395,500 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $14,950 $0 $0 $0 $14,950 Contingency $0 $0 $39,550 $0 $0 $0 $39,550 Total Costs: $0 $25,0D0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $0 $25,000 $0 SO $0 $0 S25,000 Unknown $0 $0 $450,000 $0 SO $0 $450,000 Total Costs: $0 $25,000 $450,0D0 $0 $0 $0 $475,000 Impact on operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H7 Project Number: 800-2017.12 JL Key: 1929 Object: 5650 Jersey Boulevard from Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Jersey Boulevard - From Haven Avenue to Rochester Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 04/2018 - 06/2019 Project Status: Construction LAKES OOLF Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David RANCHOCUCRMI w/. RC ANIMAL CA [CCE LOCATION Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is approved for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category, Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Right -of -Way $0 So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $760,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 Contingency $0 $80,000 $0 50 50 $0 $80,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $50,000 $815,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $865,000 Fire Capital Projects (288) $0 $35,000 $0 50 $0 $0 $35,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. a Project Number: 800-2017-13 JL Key: 1022 Object: 5650 Local Street Pavement Rehabilitation at Various Locations Project Location: Various Locations Est. Construction Start/End 5/2018 — 7/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David Description: This project involves slurry seals and overlays. Justification: This project if a slurry seal will seal the street thus extending the pavement life and if a pavement overlay will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $30,000 $0 $0 s0 $0 $80,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $727,000 $119401000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,667,000 Inspection & Administration $50,000 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Contingency $73,600 $195,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $268,600 Total Costs: $900,600 $2,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,600 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201711 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund (174) $850,000 $450,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $1,300,000 Road Maint & Rehab (179) $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,0D0,000 Infrastructure Fund (198) $50,000 $750,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $W01000 Total Costs: $900,000 $2,200,000 so $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. H9 Project Number: BDD-2012-22 A Key: 1601 Object 5650 Youngs Canyon Road - Extension from Koch Place to Cherry Avenue Project Location: Youngs Canyon Road - Koch Place to Cherry Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings PARK ' - I ASSIA ST j i�vpSVM ON a PROJECT LOCATION Description: The extension of Youngs Canyon Road between Koch Place and Cherry Avenue will construct a 4lane road across a flood control basin and master plan its extension to Cherry Avenue. Justification: This extension of Youngs Canyon Road will construct 1,100 foot segment across an existing Rood control basin enabling future development east of the basin to complete the remaining 400 foot extension to Cherry Avenue. When completed the new road will relieve traffic congestion on Wilson Avenue to the north. Project Cost Estimate (51� Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So so $100,000 $0 $0 $o $100,000 Design/Plan Review $300,000 $50,000 $70,000 $0 $0 $o $420,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $50,000 $o $o $o $50,000 Construction $o $0 $2.600,000 $o $o so $2,600,000 Inspection & Administration so $0 $50,000 $o $0 So $50,000 Contingency $0 $o $280,000 $0 $o $0 $290,000 Total Costs: $300,000 $50,0D0 $3,150,D00 s0 $o $0 $3,500,000 Project funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020121 TBD TOTAL AD 88-2 Etiw/Highlnd Impm (813) $300,000 $50,000 $3,150,000 $0 $o so $3,500,000 Total Costs: $300,000 $50,DD0 $3,150,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 Impact on Operations: Adds 1,100 feet of roadway to the City's street maintenance program. A more detailed cost estimate will be available after the preliminary design phase is complete. H10 Traffic Projects included in this section are typically those that will promote safe and efficient traffic circulation per State and local design standards. Planned projects include two new signals, and upgrades at three intersections, synchronization at three freeway interchanges, and preparation of an ITS master plan. Traffic Projects are typically funded via Transportation Development Funds (124), Measure 1 (177), Gas Tax Funds (170, 172, and 174), Street Lighting Districts and some grant funding. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 6th at Hellman Ave - Traffic Signal $ 546,000 Installation 2 Base Line Rd at Lion St- Pedestrian $ 80,000 Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) 3 Day Creek Boulevard - Upgrade $ 63,750 Left Turn Phases 4 East Ave at Highland Ave - Traffic $ 469,000 Signal Installation 5 Freeway and Arterial Signal $ 320,000 Synchronization Phase 1 6 Intelligent Transportation System $ 650,000 Upgrade - Citywide 7 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce - $ 110,000 Safety Lighting Installation $ 2,238,750 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $112,810$110,000 $80,000 40 $1,935,940 ■ Citywide Infrastructure ■ Transportation AB 2766 ■ SLID 4 Project Location: 6th Street and Hellman Avenue ESL Construction Start/End: 3/2018 — 6/2018 Project Status: Design/Constructior Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avalla Description Project Number: 800-2017-03 A Key: 1957 Object: 5650 6th Street at Hellman Avenue - Traffic Sienal Installation The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signal, fiberoptic interconnect and related equipment at Hellman Avenue and Sixth Street. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate j$) Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 2021 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $30,000 $o $0 $0 $o $30,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction s0 $430,000 $0 $o $o $0 $430,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $43,000 $o $0 $0 $o $43,000 Contingency $o $43,000 $0 $0 $o 50 $43,000 Total Costs: $0 $546,000 $0 $0 $o $0 $546,000 Project funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 2021 TBD TOTAL Transportation (124) $0 $546,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $546,000 Total Costs: $0 $546,000 $o $0 $o $0 $546,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is $2,500 per year. Project Number: 800-2015-24 1L Key: 1921 Object 5650 Base Line Road at Lion Street - Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (HAWK) Installation Project location: Base Line Road at Lion Street Est. Construction Start/End: 4/2018 — 5/2018 Project Status: Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila �J R LECT LOCATION Rn11eRn9 9T N Pra. EASE LINE RO LIONS PARK � arv110. nR 0 ALDER ST i ) O Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of a pedestrian hybrid beacon (HAWK) and related equipment at Base Line Road and Lion Street. Justification: The project will improve pedestrian safety. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 So 90 So Design/Plan Review $20,000 $o $o $0 So $0 520,000 Right -of -Way $0 $o So $o So $o $0 Construction So 580,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $80,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 So So So Contingency So $o So $0 $0 $o $0 Total Costs: $20,000 S80,000 $o $o $o $o 5100,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure lmprv(198) $20,000 $80,000 $o $0 $0 $o $100,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $o $100,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricty and maintenance fora pedestrian hybrid beacon is $1,500 per year. 12 Project Location: Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue, Day Creek Boulevard at Banyan Street and Day Creek Boulevard at Vintage Drive Est. Construction Start/End 12/2017 — 2/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Project Number: 8OD-2017-04 1L Key: 1956 Object: 5650 Day Creek Boulevard - Upgrade Left Turn Phases 1; AN. �� M.yMkl RY! xtl k� f \qc coueq � R � l0„gq y qN 4- 'PRdAi!T LQ �j �Rt uo f i � J ow\ aRV Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, removing protected -permissive left turn phasing and replacing with flashing yellow arrow left turn phasing for the traffic signals on Day Creek Boulevard. Justification: The project will improve safety and efficiency for vehicles and pedestrians by providing flashing yellow arrow left turn vehicle movements. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 So 50 $o $0 so Design/Plan Review $o S7,500 So $0 $0 $0 S7,500 Right -of -Way $0 So $0 So So So $0 Construction $0 $45,000 $0 so So 5o $45,000 Inspection & Administration SO $6,750 s0 s0 SO $0 $6,750 Contingency So $4,500 $0 So $0 $o $4,500 Total Costs: $0 $63,750 s0 $o so $0 $63,750 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) so $63,750 $o $0 $0 $o $63,750 Total Costs: $0 $63,750 s0 $0 $0 $0 $63,750 Impact on Operations: After installation and configuration of the protected left turn traffic signal equipment, no additional impacts on operations will be present. 13 Project Number 800-2017-03 JL Key: 1958 Object: 5650 East Avenue at Highland Avenue -Traffic Signal Installation Project Location: Last Avenue and Highland Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 3/2018 — 6/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila PROJECT LOCATION I — Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signal, fiberoptic interconnect and related equipment at East Avenue and Highland Avenue. Justification: The installation of traffic signals will improve traffic safety and reduce traffic congestion. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017119 2018 19 2019 20 2020 2021 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 So 90 $0 $0 So Design/Plan Review $0 S30,000 s0 so $0 so S30,0110 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 Construction so $390,0D0 so $0 s0 s0 s390,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $10,000 $0 $0 so so $10,000 Contingency s0 $39,000 s0 s0 s0 $0 $39,000 Total Costs: so $469,000 $o s0 s0 $0 $469,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 201912 2020 2021 TBD TOTAL Transportation(124) so $469,000 s0 so so so $469,000 Tel Costs: $0 $469,000 $0 s0 $0 s0 $469,000 Impact on Operations: The City will be responsible to pay for the cost of electricity and maintenance. The estimated cost of electricity and maintenance for a traffic signal is $2,500 per year. 14 Project Number: 800-2015-16 JL Key: 1900 Object: 5650 Freeway and Arterial Signal Synchronization - Phase I Project Location: SR-210 at Haven Avenue; 1-15 at Base Line Road; and 1-15 at Foothill Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End: 9/2017 - 3/2018 Project status: Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installation of traffic signal communication systems on City local arterials and State Route, Interstate on -ramps and off -ramps and updated coordination timing along the local arterials. Justification: The project will provide communication and coordination to enable monitoring, re -timing and coordination of the City's traffic signals with the State Route and Interstate for improved traffic flow and safety. These improvements equate to reduced fuel consumption and vehicle emissions. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 so $o $o so so Design/Plan Review S85,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $85,000 Right -of -Way $0 50 So $0 so 50 $0 Construction $0 $290,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $290,000 Inspection & Administration $0 so $0 $0 $0 $o $o Contingency s0 S30,000 50 5o 50 $0 $30,000 Total Costs: $85,000 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000 Project Funding: Fundina Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL AB 2766 Air Quality Impmmnt Fund (105) $12,000 $112,910 $0 $o 5o $0 $124,810 Transportation(124) $73,000 $207,190 so $0 $0 So $280,190 Total Costs: $85,000 $320,000 s0 $0 $0 $0 $405,000 Impact on Operations: Communication and coordination with the State Route and Interstate with City Streets will improve maintenance staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These systems will also provide substantial improvements In system -wide signal timing and coordination, improving operational efficiencies, while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. 15 Project Number: 800-2012-17 1 L Key: 1831 Object 5650 Intelligent Transportation System Upgrade - Citywide Project Location: rFv�—�1 City -Wide f _ _ j� I Est. Construction Start/End: T131) Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Description: Construct conduit, fiberoptic cable, and networking devices to connect the City's traffic signals into the City's Intelligent Transportation System. Justification: Implementation of this project will improve monitoring, retiming and coordination of the City's traffic signal system. Project Cost Estimate ($j: Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBO TOTAL Consultant Services $20,652 $1501000 $150,000 $1501000 $150,000 $0 $620,652 Staff Training $595 $0 So So So $o $595 Design/Equipment Specifications s0 So $0 $0 $0 so so Procurement/Construction $351,534 $500,000 $500,oD0 $500,000 $500,000 $5,433.350 $7,784,884 System Testing and Integration So $0 90 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $372,781 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 S5,433,350 $8,406,131 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Transportation (124) $372,781 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $5.433,350 $9,406,131 Total Coats: $372,781 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $650,000 $5,433,350 $8,406,131 Impact on Operations: Development of the City's ITS will improve maintenance, staff efficiencies and reduce related costs. These system upgrades will also provide substantial improvements in system -wide signal timing and coordination, Improving operational efficiencies, while also resulting in fewer citizen complaints. a Project Location: Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue Est. Construction Start/End 7/2017 - 9/2017 Project5tatus: Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Natalie Avila Project Number: 800-2015-17 JL Key: 1902 Object: 5650 Terra Vista at Spruce - Safety Lighting Installation Ao �o ,leave- o� o iieiwc roweeMwar Pn LMe �fHr R:1\ T LOCATI ALPM M. LIWMM �� Description: The scope of work to be performed in general consists of, but is not limited to, installing safety lighting at the existing all -way stop - controlled intersection. Justification: The project will upgrade the lighting for vehicles and pedestrians by enhancing the visibility at the intersection. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $20,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $10,000 $0 $o $0 $0 $10,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL SLD4(154) $20,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Total Costs: $20,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $130,000 Impact an Operations: The project will increase the cost for electrical service, and maintenance to replace lamps will occur approximately every 5 years. 17 Future & Unfunded Projects included in this section are those that have been identified as being a priority project, but lack dedicated funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Projects designated as 'Unfunded' could be waiting on grant approval, or perhaps until new special fund monies become available. Projects showing dedicated funding sources, but which are slated to occur in future fiscal years have mostly likely been delayed due to issues with the future funding of operating expenses. We have included this section to illustrate those priority projects that did not make it into the FY 2017/18 budget for either of these reasons. Staff is actively pursuing grant or other fundraising opportunities for several of the projects in this section. Project List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 1 6th St at BNSF Spur Crossing west of $ 16,953,000 Etiwanda Avenue 2 Archibald Ave from Church to Palo Alto - $ 1,215,000 Storm Drain 3 Arrow Route along the s/s 500 ft to 1300 $ ft e/o 1-15 freeway - Widening 4 Cultural Center - Exterior Joint Rplcmnt $ and Exterior Painting 5 Distribution System Automation $ 6 East Ave from Chickasaw, west side, $ north 370 feet - Widen and Sidewalk 7 Etiwanda Ave from 6th St to Arrow Route - $ Street Widening Improvements 8 Etiwanda Ave Line Extension from Arrow $ to Foothill 9 Fire District - Central Station 178 (New $ Fire Station) 10 Haven Ave from Banyan to Wilson along $ the East side - Sidewalk 11 Haven Ave from Foothill to Base Line - $ Pavement Rehab 12 Heritage Park - Bridge Replacements $ 13 Hermosa Ave from Banyan to Wilson - $ Pavement Rehab 14 Hermosa Ave from Alta Loma Basin to $ Wilson - Storm Drain 15 La Grande from Hellman Ave to Amethyst $ - Street Improvements 16 Lemon Ave from Archibald to Haven - $ Pavement Rehab 17 Lemon Avenue from Haven to 1300 feet $ west - Storm Drain Pro*ect List & FY 2017-18 Expenditures 18 LoanMart Stadium - Field Renovation $ 160,000 19 LoanMart Stadium - Scoreboard/Prod $ 1,100,000 Rm Equipment Rplcmnt 300,000 20 Paul A. Biane Library - Second Floor $ Rancho KIDS Project 500,000 21 Rochester Ave and Arrow Route, North $ East Corner - Street Widening 250,000 22 Rochester Ave from Base Line to $ Banyan - Pavement Rehab 110,000 450,000 602,500 11,850,000 264,000 850,000 50,000 250,000 2,250,000 853,100 560,000 1,700,000 4,250,000 414,000 950,000 $ 45,881,600 Sources of Funding for FY 2017-18 $660,000 118810$50,000 $853,100 $2,00,00 $852,500 $500,000 $25,766,000 160 $1,100,000 $1,800,000 ■ PD 85 ■ CDBG -: Unknown ■ City Infrastructure ■ Equip/Veh Rplcmt ■ Measure I ■ General Drainage ■ Municipal Utility Fire Capital Projects ■Capital Reserve Transportation J Project Number: 800-2015-18 JL Key: 1839 Object: 5650 Gth Street at BNSF Sour Crossing west of Etiwanda Avenue Project Loa tion: 5th Street at the BNSF spur track, west of Etiwanda Aven,e. Est. Construction Start/End: To be determined Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Dewiption Justification: _!4r .AOfI� L R0JEqAXOhOCATION N n !slurs I j arm 6TN ST / Twa swazniN" 'tJ- 4 y k z 481pFWfT� 6 4TH sT Prepare preliminary design drawings and cost estimates for a grade crossing at 6th Street and the BNSF Railroad Spur. This project, if constructed, would complete 6th Street, between Santa Anita Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, and provide better traffic circulation for the area. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So $o $0 $0 $o So 50 Design/Plan Review S74,360 50 $0 $0 5o $960,000 $1,034,360 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $893,000 $893,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $12,100,000 $12,100,000 Inspection &Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $1,800,000 Total Costs: $74,360 $0 $0 so $0 516,953,000 517,027,360 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Unknown s0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,953,ODO $16,953,000 Transportation Fund(124) $74,360 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $74,360 Total Costs: $74,360 $o $0 $0 $0 $16,953,000 $17,027,360 Impact on Operations: None at this time J1 Project Number: 800-2012-14 JL Key: 1805 Object: 5650 Archibald Avenue from Church Street to Palo Alto Street - Storm Drain Project Location: 1 I Archibald Avenue from Church Street to 41 S[reet to Palo Alto Street „�a„�,,, u Est. Construction Start/End To be determined Project Status: Design Department: - Engineering Ill_ EXYRCX Sr Project Manager: Romeo David ux� Description: Construct a Master Planned Storm Drain, install catch basins, manholes, and laterals. Justification: This project will improve drainage within the area. Project Cost Estimate ($j E_xp�egenditure/Cateaorv/Cateaory Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 50 $0 $0 So $0 $0 Design/Plan Review s0 $0 $0 50 50 $35,000 S35,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $1,000,000 $1,000,DD0 Inspection & Administration $o 5o 50 $0 $0 $80,D00 $80,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $100,000 $100,DD0 Total Costs: $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019120 2020121 TBD TOTAL Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 so $1,215.000 S1,215,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $1,215,000 $1,215,0D0 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance, potholes, sand bags for storm water protection and storm water cleanup, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J2 Project Number: 800-2015-14 JL Key: 1907 Object: 5650 Arrow Route along the South side 500 feet to 1300 feet e/o the Interstate 1-15 freeway - widening Project Locatlon: , `f r '+ I I W c �'� Arrow Route along the South side - rt6r-o •ar o ' /`� 500 feet to 1300 feet e o the I-15 sua -+ c freeway / �< I 3^� 71 Est. Construction Start/End TBD Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager Curt Billings Description: This project involves 800 feet of asphalt pavement widening and striping. Justification: This project will improve traffic circulation and safety with the addition of a second lane and paved shoulders. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Cateeory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $o $o So $o $0 Design/Plan Review So $0 so $0 $o $0 $0 Right -of -Way $o So $0 $0 $o $0 $o Construction s0 $0 so $0 $0 $268,000 $268.000 Inspection & Administration s0 So $0 $0 $0 $S1000 $5,000 Contingency SO $o $o So $0 $27,000 $27,000 Total Costs: s0 s0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Unknown $0 $0 so So $o $300,000 $300,000 Total Costs: $o $o $0 So $o $300,000 $300,000 Impact on Operations: None J3 Project Number: 1L Key: 1890 Object: 5650 Cultural Center - Exterior Joint Replacement and Exterior Paintine Project Location Cultural Center Est. Construction Start/End 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: PWS/Eng/CSD Project Manager: T. Quaintance/j Dyer/CSD Description: Remove and replace exterior building joints of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center and paint entire exterior of building justification: Exterior building joints are showing signs of deterioration and must be replaced to protect building. Also, the exterior of the building has not been repainted since the facility opened in 2006. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2 17 18 2018 19 2019 20 202012 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $510W $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000 Right -of -Way $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $o $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Total Costs: $5,000 $0 5500.000 so $0 $0 $505,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018129 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve (025) $5,1)K0 $0 $500,000 $0 50 $0 5505,000 Total Costs: $5,000 $o $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $505,000 Impact on Operations: None J4 Project Number: JL Key: 1916 Object: 5650 Distribution System Automation Project tuaton: B I Various key RCMU Switch - _ 7I locations in RCMU Service Area it Est Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Description Deployment of remotely and/or automatically controlled devices within RCMU's Distribution System. Justification: Placement of automated equipment in key asset infrastructure within RCMU's distribution system would allow for improvement in system reliability and efficiency in quickly identifying outages. The ability to remotely monitor distribution system conditions and and possibly control switches would reduce customer outage duration and improve restoration time. A SCADA system with a communication network such as wireless or existing fiber optic will be required. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES so 50 $0 so $0 s0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 50 So $0 So $50,000 $50,000 Right -of -Way 50 $0 so $0 so $0 $o Construction $o $0 $0 50 $o 5300,000 $100,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency $0 $0 50 $0 so $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $o $o $250,000 5250,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility (Fund 705) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 s0 $o 5250,000 $250,000 Impact on Operations: The increased reliability will provide better customer service in identifying potential outages and restoring power as quickly as possibly in RCMU's service area. J5 Project Number: 800-2016-16 JL Key: 1931 Object: 5650 East Avenue from Chickasaw Road to 370 feet north - Street Widening and Sidewalk Improvements Project Avenue --.�'""""'� _ East Avenue from Chickasaw Road—�� V0UST,AV F ` to 370 feet north, along the west \< L 17 I r side. �� At` ? v^RNF3y.-tea n II Est. Construction Start/End TED Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings FIRE STA 176 ETIWANDA OLONYETIWAMDA CR. EEK COMMUNI PARK ELEMENTARY ��-+� LV SU MIT INTERMED ATE JUNIOR HIGH aT� 3 n`eIR CI o 6o:ATION z ARFIA ST z GYPSUM nR Description: This project will install 310 feet of sidewalk and street widening improvements along the west side to close a gap between two existing sections of sidewalk. Justification: The sidewalk and widening improvements will improve pedestrian and vehiclecirculation. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES So So to SO $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review 50 $0 $o SO $0 S5,000 $5,000 Right -of -Way So $0 $0 $0 So $0 So Construction $0 $0 $o So $0 $93,000 $93,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 $0 SO $0 $3,000 $3,000 Contingency so $0 $0 $0 $0 $9.000 59,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 so $0 $0 $110,000 $110,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Unknown $o $0 so $0 $o $110,000 $110,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 so $0 $0 $110,000 $110,000 Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs J6 Project Number: 800-2010-15 1L Key: 1076 Object: 56SO Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route - Street Widening Improvements Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue from 6th Street to Arrow Route eMra-off Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: —oy �Igll� Y r Curt Billings 3 N Description: Widen Etiwanda Avenue to two lanes in each direction, from 6th Street to Whittram Avenue including bike lanes from 6th Street to Arrow Route. Justification: Widening Etiwanda Avenue will improve traffic circulation. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $0 $0 $o SO 90 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $o $0 $o $0 $20,000 $20,000 Right -of -Way So $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction SO $0 $0 $0 $o $390,000 $390,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $10.000 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 $30,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $450,000 $450,000 Project Funding: Fundin_g_Source Prior years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Transportation Fund (124) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000 $450,000 Impact an Operations: Reduction of routine maintenance activities for pothole repair, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other needed areas. J7 Project Location: Etiwanda Avenue Electric Line Extension - from Arrow Route to Foothill Boulevard Est. Construction Start/End TBD Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Fred Lyn Project Number: A Key: 1885 Object: 5650 Etiwanda Avenue Line Extension PROJECT LOCATION Description: Distribution Line Extension east of the 1-15 freeway to service vacant parcels on the corner of Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue with RCMU electricity. Justification: Line extension is needed to extend power service on Etiwanda Avenue to service vacant parcels on the corner Etiwanda Avenue and Foothill Boulevard. The City paid SCE exit fees for the right to service any load associated with a newly constructed facility or undeveloped parcels that has never been interconnected with Edison; this falls under that category. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2019 19 2019120 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 90 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500 $2,500 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $p $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 50 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 so $100,000 $100,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 50 $602,500 $602,500 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 19 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Municipal Utility(Fund 705) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 $602,500 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $602,500 $602,500 Impact on Operations: The increased electricity load will provide additional revenue to RCMU J8 Project Number: JL Key: 1645 Object: 5600 / 5650 Fire District - Central Station (178) Project location:`�° /�( South Side of Town Drive, E/O '�—� l l BRAS IN RD � Haven Avenue ? 'S I }r-� �ja, Tom-'-1 aza"rsvtcw,pn Est. Construction Start/End: Unknown Project Status: Property Purchased Department: Fire Protection District U15TT Project Manager: Chief Mike Costello/Pamela Pane Description: Property acquired for a future fire station. TH Justification: This station will serve the center of the Rancho Cucamonga community. It will provide the area with emergency services for fire suppression and life safety. The project will begin when the population and call volume trigger the need. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 So $0 $0 SO S50,000 $50,000 Design/Plan Review So $0 $o $0 $o 51,000,000 S3,000,000 Land Acquisition $3,320,000 5o 50 $0 SO $0 S3,320,000 Construction $0 so $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 $30,000,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 SO $o SO SO $0 Construction Management SO $o so $0 $o $8o0,000 $900,000 Total Costs: $3,320,000 50 so $0 $0 $11.850,000 $15,170,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017118 2018 19 2019120 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Fire Capital Projects (288) $3,320,000 So So $0 $o $11,8501000 $15,170,000 Total Costs: $3,320,000 so $0 $0 $0 S11,850,000 $15,170,000 Impact on Operations: Annual station operations and maintenance costs will depend on the station size and staffing costs at the time of construction. Designs with greater active/passive energy conservation and greater xeriscape will cost less to operate. Capital equipment purchase of an engine. a Project Number: 800-2013-32 A Key: 1864 Object: 5650 Haven Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue along the East side - Sidewalk Project Location: East side of Haven Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Est. Construction Start/End Tb be determined Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: The proposed sidewalk along east sideof Haven Avenuewill fill a gap where sidewalks aremissing and provide improved ADAaccess to Chaffey College. Justification: This project is part of the City Master Plan. The improvements will improve pedestrian circulation and ADAcompliance. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 90 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $3,950 So So $0 $0 $0 53,950 Right -of -Way $0 $0 so 50 $0 $0 $0 Construction So $0 $0 $0 $0 $230,000 $230,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $o $0 $0 S11,000 $11,000 Contingency $o $0 $0 $0 So $23,000 $23,000 Total Costs: $3,950 $0 so $0 So $264,000 $267,950 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Gas Tax R&T 7360 Fund(174) $3,950 $0 $o $0 $0 $o $3,950 Unknown $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $264,000 $264,000 Total Costs: $3,950 $0 $0 $0 $o $264,000 $267,950 Impact on Operations: None J10 Project Number: BM2017-07 1L Key: 1933 Object: 5650 Haven Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Haven Avenue - From Foothill Boulevard to Base Line Road Est. Construction Start/End: 05/2018 - 06/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Romeo David (( ASE LINEd Rp CT �o OJ T CATIO Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and will be submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $o Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5o,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $80,000 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Contingency $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $o $0 $70,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $o $850,000 $0 $0 So $900,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $50,000 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Total Costs: $50,000 $0 $850,000 $0 $0 $0 $900,000 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. Project Number: 800-2017-17 1L Key: 1963 Object: 5650 Heritage Park - Bridge Replacements Project Location: Heritage Park - Multi Use trail bridge replacements Est. Construction Start/End TBD Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: This project will replace the multi use wood bridges that span the Demers Creek at various locations around Heritage Park Justification: This project will replace 5 aged bridges constructed of wood with more long lasting structural steel and concrete bridges to maintain access to the park and existing trails Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Catecory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 5o $0 $0 50 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $50,000 $50,000 Right -of -Way $0 $o so $o $0 $o $0 Construction So $o $o $o $0 $o $o Inspection & Administration $0 so $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Contingency $o so $o $0 $o $0 $0 Total Costs: $0 so $o $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2019 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL PD 85 Redemption Fund(848) $o $0 $0 $o $o $50,000 $50,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 5o $0 50 $50,000 $50,000 Impact on operations: This project will reduce bridge maintenance costs and improve safety. J12 Project Number: 800-2012-29 JL Key: 1815 Object: 5650 Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Hermosa Avenue from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue Fst Construction Stan/End: 08/2018 - 10/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings LOCATION at31 Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valve and manhole cover adjustments, and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $o $o s0 s0 50 s0 Design/Plan Review so $0 so s0 s0 50 $o Right -of -Way s0 $o $0 $0 50 50 $0 Construction $o $0 5227,000 s0 s0 $0 $227,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o s0 50 50 s0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $23 000 50 50 s0 $23,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $250,000 So so $0 $250,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Citywide Infrastructure(198) $0 $0 $250,000 $o s0 $0 $250,000 Total Costs: $o s0 $250,000 $0 $0 $o $250,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J13 Project Number: 800-2012-28 A Key: 1810 Object: 5650 Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue - Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: Hermosa Avenue from the Alta Loma Basin to Wilson Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: 0412018 - 09/2018 Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Prawn manager. Curt Billings Description: Justification: ALTA LOMA BASIN !CT LOCATION HEFT ALTA LOMA BASIN Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from the Alta Basin to Wilson Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion (see Hermosa rehabilitation project JL 1815). This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use, and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access to the Hermosa Intermediate School at Wilson Avenue and Hermosa Avenue. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Cateeory Prior years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBO TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $o $o So $o So $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 5o So So So $o $0 Right -of -Way $o So $0 So So so $0 Construction $0 $0 $2,050,000 $o $o $0 $2,050,000 Inspection & Administration $o $0 So 5o so $o SO Contingency $0 $0 S200,000 So $o So $200,000 Total Costs: $0 so 52,250,000 $0 So So $2,250,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior years 20 7 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 in TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) $o $o SS00i $0 $0 $o $500,000 Citywide Infrastructure(198) $0 $0 S1,750,000 SO $0 $0 $1,750,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $2,250,000 $o $0 $o $2,250,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenance costs for pothole and crack repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J14 Project Number: 800-2017-18 R Key: 1965 Object: 5650 La Grande Street Improvements from Hellman Avenue to Amethyst Avenue Project Location: l La Grande Street from Hellman ---JL�I 1_ a Avenue to Amethyst Avenue u 7r�c.� Est. Construction Start/End To be determined Project Status: Design/Construction Department: ' I IL — Engineering ,T�-"j--(((-000JIII{ ." I�o:�_JI{ U Project Manager: 8 A r ��c�.,: Curt Billings I E Q I�� CXeY sj '}�'9'}•q Description: This project adds sidewalks, street lights, curb and gutter and drainage improvements to provide a pedestrian access route from the west to the Alta Loma Elementary School, Justification: This project will improved safety and provide ADA accessible access route to the Alta Loma Elementary School. Project Cost Estimafe ($): Expenditure/Catecory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 so 50 so so 50 Design/Plan Review $0 50 $0 So SO $o $0 Right -of -Way $o $0 So $0 $0 $0 $o Construction $o $0 So So So $723,100 $723,300 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 So So $0 S63,000 $63,000 Contingency 50 $o So So $0 $67,000 567,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $0 $0 s0 $853,100 $953.100 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019120 2020121 TBD TOTAL Community Dev Block Grant (204) SO SO $o So So $853.100 $853,100 Total Costs: $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $853,100 $853,100 Impact on operations: This project adds nine street lights to Street Light Maintenance Districts SLD 1 and SLD 2 J15 Project Number: 800-2012-24 jL Key: 1793 Object: 5650 Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: Lemon Avenue from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description: This project involves cold planning and localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt pavement overlay, traffic signal loop replacement, utility valve and manhole cover adjustments, and pavement striping. Justiflution: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES 90 So $0 So 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 So $10,000 Right -of -Way so so $0 $o So $0 SO Construction $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $500,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $o $0 $0 $o $10,000 $10,000 Contingency So So $0 $0 s0 $50,000 $50,000 Total Costs: $10,000 $0 $0 SO SO $560,000 $570,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2018119 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Prop 42 Fund(190) $10,000 $o $0 $0 $0 $0 S10,o00 Unknown SO SO SO $0 $0 $560,000 $560,000 Total Costs: $10,000 SO $0 $0 $0 $560,000 $570,000 Impact on Operations: Reduced street maintenance costs for pothole repairs and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance crews to attend to other needed areas. J16 Project Number: 800-2011-08 JL Key: 1791 Object 5650 Lemon Avenue from Haven Avenue to 1,300 feet west - Storm Drain Improvements Project Location: Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status Design Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings Description Justification: W Construct a master planned storm drain, install mainline, catch basins and manholes. The entire street from Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue will be resurfaced upon completion (see Lemon rehabilitation project JL 1793). This project will improve drainage and extend pavement life, use and rideability. Also, during rain events it will provide improved pedestrian access. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Year 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPOES $o $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $2,0oo SO So $0 so $0 $2,000 Right -of -Way SO so $0 $o $o $o s0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,520,000 $1,520,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 so $0 $0 $10,000 $10,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $170,000 $170,000 Total Costs: $2,000 $0 SO SO $o S1,700,000 $1,702,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2 7 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Drainage General Fund(112) $2,000 $0 so $o $0 $o $2,000 Unknown $o $0 $0 so so $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Total Costs: $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S1,700,000 $1,702,000 Impact on Operations: Elimination of storm water protection costs for placing sand bags and cleanup, and a reduction of street repair maintenace costs for pothole and crack repairs, thus freeing up maintenance crews for other areas. J17 Project Location: Loan Mart Stadium Est. Construction Start/End: 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services Project Manager: Dean Rodia Project Number: 1L Key: Object: 5607 LoanMart Stadium • Field Renovation e 3 ROJECT LOCATI01� RMCMO COCxMp map VSFORle GOrltexAR HRi M k y in Description: Demolition, stripping existing grass to a depth of 1", removal of all waste from site, till existing soil, import sand to create a level surface, laser grading, compaction and resetting of irrigation heads. New sod grown to City specifications. Pre -plant fertilizer will be applied before sod installation. Sod to be rolled with a 1 ton smooth double drum roller. No design is necessary to complete this work it will be based upon current field standards. Justification: Existing playing field has deteriorated from years of use. Staff maintenance of field is constant Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 50 $0 50 $0 $o Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $0 $0 s0 $o $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 50 $0 So So $0 Construction $0 $0 $160,000 $0 So $0 $160,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 50 5o $0 $0 Contingency $o $o $0 $o So 50 $0 Total Costs: $0 $0 $160,000 $0 s0 50 $160,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2 17 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Capital Reserve Fund (025) j0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $160.000 $0 $0 $o $160,000 Impact on Operations: Renovations will reduce the maintenance requirements for the field and allow for better water penetration, resulting In lower water usage. 118 Project Number: JL Key: 1951 Object: 5650 Loan Mart Stadium - Scoreboard/Production Room Equipment Replacement Project Location Loan Mart Stadium Est Construction Start/End 07/2017 — 06/2018 Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Public Works Services/1301T Project Manager: Bill W./Darryl P. Description: Replace scoreboard and production room equipment at LoanMart Stadium. �� 5 PROJECT LOCATION Justification: The existing scoreboard system and production room equipment are obsolete. Repair/replacement parts are no longer made for this system. Project Cost Estimate ($) Expenditure/Category Prior Yea n 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $900,000 $o $0 $0 $900,000 Inspection & Administration $o So S20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Contingency $o 50 $90.000 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 Total Costs: $0 $0 $1,100,000 $o $0 $0 $1,100,000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 2017 18 2 18 19 2019/20 2020121 TBD TOTAL Equip/Vehicle Replacement(712) $0 $0 51,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $1,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000 Impact on Operations: None 119 Project Number: 1L Key: 1867 Object: 5650 Paul A. Biane Library- Second Floor Rancho KIDS Project Project Location: 12505 Cultural Center Drive �� - z ,�J Est. Construction Start/End: TBD Project Status: Installation Department: Library Project Manager: Brian Sternberg Description: Rancho KIDS is a project that will build out the second floor of the Paul A. Biane library at Victoria Gardens. Rancho KIDS is envisioned as an interactive children's museum combined with traditional library services to create a new type of learning experience. Design and cost estimates of the second Floor has been established as a City Council goal for FY 2014-15. Justification: Demand for library services in the community continues to increase, particularly for the ages 0-7. Rancho KIDS is being designed to provide anew, unique service model that will combine the features of interactive children's museum exhibits with traditional libraryservices. Rancho KIDS should also be a regional draw that will provide additional visitors to both the Victoria Gardens Shopping District and the Lewis Family Playhouse. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Category Prior Years 2017 18 201811 2019 20 2020 21 TBD TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 s0 s0 s0 so $0 Design/Plan Review $250,000 so So so so $750,000 $1,000,000 Right -of -Way $0 so $0 so $0 $0 so Construction $2,400,000 $0 $0 so $o $3.500,000 $5,900,000 Inspection & Administration $0 s0 $0 $0 $0 s0 So Contingency $0 so so $0 s0 $0 so Total Costs: $2,650,000 $0 $0 So 5o S4,250,000 56.900.000 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Year 2017 1 201 19 2019 2 2020121 TBD TOTAL Library Capital Fund (329) $2,650,000 s0 $0 $0 s0 $0 $2,650,000 Unknown $0 s0 $0 s0 s0 $4,250,000 54,250,000 Total Costs: $2,650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 54,Z50,000 $6,900,000 Impact on Operations: Feasibility study projects an approximate $300,000 per year cost for operations and maintenance. (The project is designed to be revenue -generating.) J 20 Project Number: 800-2016-18 1L Key: Object: 5650 Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route, North East Corner - Street Widening and Sidewalk Improvements Project Location: Rochester Avenue and Arrow Route, North East Corner - Street Widening and Sidewalk Improvements Est. Construction Start/End: 78 D Project Status: Design/Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings u it ERANCHOCUCAM 1�PICEN R/SPORTS C PLEX 40 ��ORTS COMPLEX WSENN•CD MAL CA E&ADOP 10 RRROW_RTE H PROJECT LOCATION RE-STAT10 174 A 8 I nr.. Description: This project will install SOO linear feet of street widening aimprovements, relocate 2 utility poles, underground utilites, Install street lighting, and upgrade a traffic signal with video detection. Justification: The sidewalk and widening improvements will improve pedestrian and vehicle circulation. Project Cost Estimate ($): Expenditure/Categwv Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020121 TEO TOTAL Environmental/NPDES $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $2,000 $2.000 Design/Plan Review $0 SO $0 $0 $0 So $0 Right -of -Way $0 $0 $o $0 So 5o $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $o 50 5238,000 $239,000 Inspection&Administration $0 $0 $0 5o So 5150,000 $150,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 so 5o $240Un $24,000 Total Costs: $o $0 $o $o $0 $414,000 S414,o00 Project Funding: Funding Source Prior Years 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Unknown So $o $0 $0 So $414,000 $414,000 Total Costs: $0 So So $0 $0 $414,000 $414,000 Impact on Operations: This project will reduce maintenance and weed abatement costs and increase lighting costs J21 Project Number: 800-2016-02 1L Key: 1935 Object SGS0 Rochester Avenue from Base Line Road to Banyan Street - Pavement Rehabilitation Project Location: > �r're',Ts x ^ o1r eexrot er ci�t• a�� Smwu n s. oo x Rochester Avenue - From Base lrne oUU�xz CI Road to Banyan Street ,� (� 4{I r Est. Construction Start/End 06/2019-08/2019 Project Status: Construction Department: Engineering Project Manager: Curt Billings A i rrs Description: This project involves cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, traffic signal video detection, utility valves and manhole adjustments and pavement striping. Justification: This project will restore the existing road surface to a substantially new condition, extending pavement life, use and rideability. In addition, the project is using asphalt rubber and is therefore eligible and will be submitted for a CalRecycle rebate. Project Cost Estimate (S) Expenditure/Catexory Prior Years 2017 18 2018 19 2019 20 2020 21 TBD T Environmental/NPDES so So so so 50 $0 $0 Design/Plan Review $50,000 $0 So $0 $0 so $50,000 Right -of -Way s0 $0 $0 So $0 $0 $0 Construction s0 $0 $845,000 $0 $0 $0 $945,000 Inspection & Administration $0 $0 $20,000 so so $0 $20,000 Contingency 50 $0 $85 000 $0 $0 $o $95,000 Total Costs: 550,000 $0 S950,000 so 50 $0 51,000,000 Project Funding: Fundine Source Prior Years 201718 201819 201920 202021 TBD TOTAL Measure I Fund (177) $50,000 $0 5950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000.000 Total Costs: $50,000 so $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,0D0 Impact on Operations: Less routine maintenance like pothole repairs, weed abatement and crack seal, thus freeing up maintenance aews to attend to other needed areas. J 22 General Policies 2017/2018 Improvement Program V"JNOWHD[lD OH DNV'd NoilvDIAULIVAU Action 2' Ty pe a m d General Plan Policy y u c L 3: > m C. 7 w N 'r' 'c W M L O N d 0: K c .N C 0 Y 01 .� Implementation Action(s) E o a c c +� o .a ° o ` uai m a rn a N o: U. a` CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major O streets that are key pedestrian routes, Including the provision of 311 benches, shade trees, and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities A B such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C D 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 312 O development promote safety, pedestrian -friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG 1 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL. RD A, B, 4 providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C, D connections to transit at key locations in the City. CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4 CM- Coordinate the provision of the non -motorized networks (bicycle 3,15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub - regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E. F 4 CM- O Establish fixed -route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed -route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E. H 5 location, and funding mechanisms. Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-4.1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-25 Action Ty pe a d u General Plan Policy m N N Y N O G Ch C �+ T c X Implementation Action(s)E a m e o LL a a) a to W ri a PL, AS, A, B. Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3 CM, BS, G, I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4 4. PL ENG A. 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support PS-12.4 O public transit, Including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide green building Incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6 1 to RC-6 4 PL BNB A, I, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1 ENG PL A 3 PS-127 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL EN A, I 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM. FIN, A,B. C. 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA G EN E RAL PLAN A-57 OH DNVN Action A TV pe a a General Plan Policy N d ; ry N F 0 W IY p N K T Y 0 = m 0 C J .o o. Implementation Action(s) C m Q. Ill. to a w Iz U. a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic Flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW A, D' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for It's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A' D. 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation Impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A_26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN VDNOWVDfID OH DNVN SAI.LI'II7F'3 Action D Ty pe a d d General Plan Policy d N y 0 j N N O O C 0 Implementation Action(s) `o 0. Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 O tourismfvisitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 O placement of full -service hotels that will complement the existing select -service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a RD PL A. G 4 full -service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can accommodate a full -service hotel at desired locations. ED3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all CM AS, FIN A, G 1 sources continue to more than match projected spending. ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of "Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8 ENG PL A' G' 4 ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A, G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of Iffe amenities to attract more knowledge -based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A. G 4 enrichment facilities and programs, trails, and quality school districts. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action L Ty pea General Plan Policy e e r ry o Z ` 12 01 m LL' C d K rna C m o N '? c d Implementation Action(s) E a n e o oo a m a m 0: i a RC-6.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-6.3. PL ENG A, 1 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to Implement high -quality standards for new public facilities and Improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal polirl for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A. B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B. C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low -maintenance features Into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainabllity plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A. B, C 3 of the on -going maintenance program. BS PF-1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, Flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-411 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Vf)NOWVDfID OH DNVN 5110INt'"I'I:IJSIIV Action Ty pe a U o General Plan Policy v 0 N y 3 K u �? N O O C Z : .� Implementation Action(s) E a Q. e o Q. . a N Q. N K li d Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D. 1 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D. I 4 funding. CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A E' Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19 Action L TV pe a 3 d >_ d General Plan Policy j m 0 N C S R C N T O _ A N O p C o m m Implementation Action(s) E n m 6 `o o a ° a a N - a` = w N a-' _ 0- Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on -street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, I 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to s pport Mixed Use districts. CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E, I 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicycling and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid, electric, and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas -efficient vehicles. CM PL AS A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy -efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action L Ty Pe a General Plan Policy d c �N It F C q K c N O H T u ? O O C e P Implementation Action(s) d n w IL Hrc u -02 a. Explore the Feasibility of Extending Local Transit Service Explore the possibility of extending to adjacent jurisdictions in cooperation with such jurisdictions who could also participate in funding, if beneficial to the City. Work with Regional Transit Operators (Omnitrans) Develop the optimum coordination and integration of bus transit services between the local City circulator system and the regional service. Consult with Omnitrans to establish and maintain transit hubs at CM-3.4 O Victoria Gardens, Chaffey College, the Metrolink Station, and other locations as appropriate to facilitate use of transit and transfers between transit services. Same action as identified for CM-3 1. ENG PL A 4 Consider and evaluate the possible relocation of the Metrolink CM-3.5 O Station to Haven Avenue to provide improved connections to transit and to support planned transit -oriented land uses along Haven Avenue. Work with Metrolink and Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA) to study the feasibility of moving the Metrolink Station from its ENG, current location to Haven Avenue. Explore options for alternative funding PL RD E. F 6 from sources other than the General Fund, such as grants, and specifically grants that promote transit -oriented development. In addition to requiring private development to provide transit amenities, consult with regional transit operators to provide CM-3.6 O attractive and convenient bus stops, including shadehveather protection, seats, transit information, and bus shelters as appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-3.1. Also, develop a program, with identified funding sources, for providing amenities at bus stops in the ENG PL D 4 City. Continue to develop and maintain a citywide bicycle network of off- street bike paths, on -street bike lanes, and bike streets to provide CM-33 O O connections between neighborhoods, schools, parks, civic center/facilities, recreational facilities, and major commercial centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-23 Action Ty pe a d d General Plan Policy d 0 d K _ o' a of > u A O Orr C '_' d .� Implementation Action(s) E a Q. e o ILo 0 a m a` V)rc it a` Implement the Bicycle Plan pursuant to Figure CM-6. Update the City's Bicycle Circulation Plan in a format suitable for obtaining public funding. Develop the planning, implementation, and design details of the bicycle facility and amenity elements of the Community Mobility Chapter, including the setting of implementation priorities and the identification of both capital and operating funding sources. Implementation should focus on adding a north -south trail along either Deer Creek or Cucamonga Creek as a first priority. Update the City's Trails Implementation Plan to m intain consistency A D with the General Plan. ENG PL E, I 4 Review City ordinances to ensure that an adequate mechanism exists to manage the use of trails only by authorized categories of users. Implementation of the Bicycle Plan may require traffic signalization at the crossing of bike paths with arterial roadways to facilitate the safe crossing of those arterials by bicyclists and pedestrians. Signals should be convenient to bicyclists with accessible push -buttons to activate the signal. Provide traffic control push button devices at convenient locations for bicyclists at signalized intersections on the identified Bicycle Network CM3.8 O O Continue to encourage the provision of bicycle facilities, such as bicycle lockers and secure bike parking, throughout the City. Identify existing locations where bicycle lockers and secure bicycle parking could be provided at key locations throughout put the City, and develop a funding and implementation plan. Encourage/require the provision of bicycle lockers and secure bike parking for major development projects, as defined in the Development PL ENG A, D, 4 Code. E, F, H Modify the Development Code to require provision of bicycle parking spaces, bicycle lockers, and, as appropriate, showers for bicycle riders at new buildings providing significant employment, at transit stations, in the commercial districts, and at recreational destinations in the City. Identify and implement a dedicated funding source for CM-3.9 O implementation and completion of the Bicycle Network as identified in the Bicycle Plan. Same action as identified for CM-3.7 ENG E. F 4 CM- O Continue to complete the installation of sidewalks and require new 3.10 development to provide sidewalks. Use the CIP to identify a schedule for installing new and replacement sidewalks throughout the City, placing priority on installing missing ENG sidewalks near schools and activity centers, and replacing sidewalks that D. have been identified as hazardous to public safety. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-24 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action k Ty pe s 3 u > m General Plan Policy c y C 2 O V O 00 A t�J N O O C e P Implementation Action(s) Ic ; 0 = c IL a to o. to 1K u 0. Strstegize with Foundation members to increase the range of CS A. H involvement in Foundation events. Provide a comprehensive, Interconnected off -road trail system that GS-61 O provides alternative mobility choices throughout the entire City and Increases connectivity. Continue to implement the principles of the Trails Implementation Plan. PL CS ENG A. I 4 Connect trails In Rancho Cucamonga to traits in the San Bernardino CS-6.2 O National Forest and other hillside open space areas. These trails shall include trailheads with vehicle parking and other amenities. Coordinate with Federal and Stale agencies to facilitate funding and CS acquisition of trail connections from the City to the San Bernardino PL ENG A 5 National Forest. Connect new trails with the North Etiwanda Preserve. CS-6.3 O Continue to Incorporate, where feasible, regional and community trails along utility corridors and drainage channels. Continue to make trail connections within the City on existing public- PL CS, A 5 agency owned properties. ENG Continue to maintain and pursue the development of planned trails CS-6.4 O and facilities for equestrian use within the Equestrian/Rural Area designation. Continue to ensure that trails accommodate equestrian users through B details outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan within north Alta Loma PL ENG C, 4 and Etiwanda. Improve existing trails by removing barriers, applying sustainability CS-6.5 O concepts, improving safety and function, and providing access to adjacent trails. Continue to program funding into the CIP for the improvements to ENG PL, BS A 4 deficient equestrian trails, as outlined in the Trails Implementation Plan. Require new development to provide access to adjacent trails and CS-6.6 O provide appropriate trail amenities (e.g., benches, drinking fountains, hitching posts, bike stands, and other amenities) for all new projects located adjacent to regional or community trails. Require new development projects adjacent to Regional or Community PL ENG A. K 4 Trails to provide access to and amenities for trails. CS-6.7 O Continue to credit publically accessible trailway acreage towards meeting parkland dedication standards. Continue to allow parkland credit for trails within development projects, PL ENG A. K 4 subject to adopted criteria. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-36 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Z` Ty pe c m General Plan Policy c m C d A 0 m c K c N of en oc .a Implementation Action(s) c a a. a to a. ar rc u a Develop a listing of acceptable fire-resistant plant types to be PL PW' ENG. A 3 incorporated into new and rehabilitated development sites. FD Encourage streetscape design and landscaping programs for LU-10.4 O commercial frontages that create vibrant places which support walking, bicycling, transit, and sustainable economic development. Same action as identified for LU-3.4. PL RNG. A 4 Consult with and coordinate with the Santa Fe Railway to develop LU-10.5 O and install a landscape plan for the enhancement of the railroad right-of-way. Inventory and assess the landscaping needs of the rail corridor, and PL ENG, A 6 consult with the rail agency to develop a plan. RD Continue to pursue strategies to reduce long -tens operation and LU-10.6 O maintenance costs within the City's Landscape Maintenance Districts and other publicly funded areas. Inventory and prioritize the removal of turf areas within landscape medians to be replaced with plantings that reduce long-term operations PW ENG A 5 and maintenance costs. Continue to implement and update as necessary the City's Sign LU-11.1 O O Ordinance in order to provide for a reasonable system of review and Incentives for well -designed signs throughout the City. Establish a periodic review schedule of all City ordinances that govern aesthetics to determine if industry standards have changed or if other PL RD A, K 4 objectives are desirable that require amendments. Continue to require the undergrounding of utility lines and facilities LU-11.2 O O wherever feasible to minimize the unsightly appearance of overhead utility lines and utility enclosures. Require undergrounding of utilities for new development. Develop a A B strategy and prioritization list for the undergrounding utilities in developed ENG PL O, 4 areas. LU-11.3 O O Require communication towers to be located and designed to blend with the surrounding environment. Review and update design guidelines for the siting and general appearance of communication towers to facilitate the least amount of PL A 4 visual intrusion. Emphasize use of stealth and architecturally integrated antenna. Ensure that streetscape design along roadways creates a strong LU-12.1 O landscaped edge, provides a coherent high -quality appearance along each route, and enhances the image of adjacent development. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA G ENE RAL PLAN A-13 Action L Ty pe n m m General Plan Policy y ie a L= `m c e N of p Im T Y Implementation Action(s) A L CL C Z+ 0 o Q n r. C ? 0. a. m a rn z u- a PL, AS, A. B, Same actions as identified for RC4.1 to RC4.5. ENG ENG, CM, BS, C, E, 3 PW, FIN G, I Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking infrastructure, and support PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC-4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide green building incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BN'G A, 1, K 4 Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7.1, ENG PL A 3 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1. 1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL PW , A, 1 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B. C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57 w bIUNICIPAL UTILITY RANCHO CUCAMONGA Action #`Ce� fi+F_: Ty pea d m General Plan Policy ma Z' o v 01 y K F C y D: rna C •y N T V N G G m m Implementation Action(s) R E n m c o o a ° a a W o` w y 0: W. o` RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A, 1 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to implement high -quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B, C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF-1.5 O O continue to incorporate low -maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A B C 3 of the on -going maintenance program. BS PF-1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Ty pe a General Plan Policy o u m B 0 � > u M .a a °1 0 Implementation Action(s) E a m c `o_ oo Pursue efforts to reduce energy consumption through appropriate RC4.1 O energy conservation and efficiency measures throughout all segments of the community. As it becomes economically practical, identify sources and replace A B imported, non-renewable energy resources with domestic renewable PL ENG, C. E, 5 energy sources such as solar and wind energy, recycled municipal solid CM G waste, and green waste. Promote the use of renewable energy and alternative energy technology, and support efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation (e.g. solar, wind, cogeneration, and biomass) to RC4.2 O reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid and reduce the use of natural gas, while providing Rancho Cucamonga with a greater degree of energy and economic self- sufficiency. Provided that there would not be a decline in services to City residents or A B undue tax burden, use of energy efficiency and renewable energy ENG AS, CM, C. D, 6 resources will be employed for approving capital and operational PL E, G. I expenditures. RC4.3 O Encourage the use of solar energy systems in homes and commercial businesses. Establish design criteria for active and passive solar applications within PL ENG, A 5 development proposals. BS Reduce operational energy requirements through sustainable and RC4A O O complementary land use and circulation planning. Support implementation of State mandates regarding energy consumption and greenhouse gas reduction, including AB32 and SB375. Promote land use and circulation patterns that result in multi -purpose automobile tdps and that facilitate the use of local and regional transit; continue to advance land use patterns that provide employment and PL ENG A, 1 3 housing opportunities for City residents in a manner that allows for practical options for mobility other than by automobile. Support the development of private sources of sustainable and RC4.5 O O environmentally friendly energy supplies, provided these are consistent with City aesthetic and public safety goals. Continue to make the recruitment and retention of "green" industries a RD GM' A, G 4 priority in conjunction with economic development strategies. PL Serve as a role model by adopting recognizable standards and incorporating the use of sustainable strategies for new and existing RC-5.1 O public buildings that maximize occupant health and productivity, minimize operating costs, and provide good environmental stewardship. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-40 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN PARKS RANCHO CUCAMONGA Action L Ty pe a m General Plan Policy .o u c 3 y m K 25 •E rY N T U a A 0 O O C ✓= Y 0•d Implementation Action(s) E a uai c o o IL : a a ro a o d rn R o a Q. Continue to assess that the recreational needs of the City's residents are consistent with the City's parkland standard, and determine possible re- CS PL, ENG A 4 use or conversion of infill sites for recreational uses to serve areas within the City with a disproportionate amount of parkland. Develop parks that contribute to active and healthy lifestyles, and CS-1.2 O allow for a balanced commitment to both organized recreation activities and passive park environments. Move forward with plans to continue to develop Central Park, expand Etiwanda Creek Park, add one new Community park, one new Special CS CM, A 4 Use Facility, and two new Neighborhood parks. Incorporate active and ENG passive facilities into new parks. CS-1.3 O Continue to develop Central Park as envisioned in the Central Park Master Plan. Continue to prioritize implementation of the improvements for Central CS ENG, PL A 4 Park as part of the City's CIP process. CS-1.4 O Pursue developing an outdoor special use facility that includes a multi -field sports complex. Continue to prioritize development of a sports complex and determine CS ENG, A 4 funding mechanisms, including corporate sponsorships/partnerships. RD, PL Continue to require new development to provide needed park CS-1.5 O facilities through the various measures and tools available to the City (e.g., in -lieu fees and/or land dedication). Continue to make the provision of turn -key park and recreational facilities PL ENG, A, D, I, 4 the first priority over in -lieu fees for new residential development. CS K Pursue and expand joint -use of public lands that are available and CS-1.6 O suitable for recreational purposes, including school district properties and flood control district, water district, and other utility properties. Continue to coordinate with other agencies holding public lands for possible joint -use, trail easements, or re -use to serve park/recreation PL ENG A, K 4 particularly with school district properties. Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent uses CS-1.7 O through park location and design, including the location of buildings, lighting, parking, public transit, emergency access, and pedestrian/bicycle access. Continue to utilize the Recreation Needs and System Recommendation CS PL, ENG A, K 4 Study and the park master plan concept in park planning. CS-1.8 O O Continue to build, renovate, and maintain parks in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-32 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Ty pe a d d General Plan Policy d c u ry 0 O rn K Z 0 c C eQ n Implementation Action(s) E n R a. rn a rq K 2 S Continue to provide for maintenance, renovation and new construction of City parks in compliance with City policies, upgrading wastewater ENG CS PL, A B C 4 systems as needed, and as technology evolves, substitute material that PW could reduce maintenance costs and is environmentally friendly. Develop intermediate sized (10-12 acre) parks with lighted athletic CS-1.9 O fields and appropriate parking to accommodate community sports programs. Update the City's Recreation Needs and Systems Recommendation Study to determine the location for intermediate -sized park sites CS PL, ENG A, B, C 7 specifically (developed for athletic field use. This may include joint -use facilities with a school district. Integrate Healthy RC activities, classes, and programs with CS-2.1 O recreational services that contribute to the health, fitness, and minds of participants. Continue to provide City -sponsored recreational programs and classes at CS CM A, 1 4 recreational centers/parks. CS-2.2 O O Provide high -quality Community Services programs that are flexible and responsive to the community's changing needs. Continue to provide active recreational opportunities through leagues CS CM A, 1 4 and organized sports. Plan and conduct community special events that bring residents CS-2.3 O together to create an enhanced quality of life and promote economic development Plan for community events through the annual budgeting process. CS RD, CM A, 1 4 Continue to consult with non-profit sports organizations and CS-2.4 O recreational groups to support their offering of diverse recreational programs that complement and supplement those of the City. Continue to serve as a clearinghouse to coordinate among the various CS A, 1 4 sport leagues to make fields and facilities available. Continue to make community facilities and park amenities available CS-2.5 O for rental by community residents, non-profit groups and businesses to meet their recreational and business needs. Continue to promote the City's various rental facility types by ensuring that a complete summary of locations, facilities, services, fees, and CS A 4 applications are available. I Continue broad -based public outreach activities that inform CS-2.6 O residents of all available Community Services programs and services, and obtain input from the community regarding program and service needs. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-33 Action i TV pe m m c General Plan Policy m y g �? o n ` o m K C C y 0 N r u = R O O 0 Implementation Action(s) E a aoi c o ao a` m a` rn C RC-8.7 O O Support protection of natural habitat areas for ecological, educational, and other scientific study purposes. Same action as identified for RC-8.3. PL ENG A. 1 4 PF-1.1 O Continue to Implement high -quality standards for new public facilities and improvements to existing buildings. Design and build all City buildings to serve as a model for quality architectural treatment and green building design in all new and PL ENG A, B. C 5 remodeled civic facilities. PF-1.2 O Promote community facilities as focal points for gatherings, events, and celebrations. Maintain all public facilities and buildings to address the needs of the various neighborhoods within the City. Advertise the availability of civic PW CS, LIB A, B, C 3 facilities to community groups. PF-1.3 O Locate new community facilities in neighborhoods and centers where they will serve populations with the greatest needs. Review and assess the needs for the location of community facilities as CS ENG, PL A 6 neighborhoods evolve. PF-1.4 O O Maintain public facilities and optimize their usefulness during their lifespan. Continue with proper maintenance programming and funding levels for PW CS, LIB, A, B, C 4 existing public facilities. AC PF-1.5 O O Continue to incorporate low -maintenance features into public facilities consistent with the City's sustainability plan. Replace features of public facilities with lower maintenance types as part PW PL, CS, A, B, C 3 of the on -going maintenance program. BS PF-1.6 O Maintain multi -functional, flexible, and complementary space at community facilities. Same action as identified for PF-1.2. CS PW A, B, C 3 Maximize public facility use by sharing with nonprofit organizations, school districts, and community organizations. Look PF-1.7 O for opportunities to create joint -use community space at facilities owned by private organizations such as faith -based groups and service clubs. Same action as identified for CS-2.5. CS A 4 Consult with local school districts to enhance the development of PF-2.1 O O joint -use agreements, allowing for optimum use of school facilities, to provide broad community benefits such as public safety and education. Continue and expand joint use of facilities to achieve even greater CS SD A, K 5 optimization of school facilities to service the entire community. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-44 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN RAILROAll CROSSINGS RANCHO CUCAMONGA Action y TV pe a m General Plan Policy m A N 0 y F m .a m 0 o L c e Implementation Action(s) E a 0 c o a a. 0 a` rn K u a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available funding. ENG PL A, D. 1 4 CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A. E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F H I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19 Action I D TV pe d u General Plan Policy c c d m m m oa L B o `y = C u rna c •N Go O C o Q Action(s) _ 0 ? 0 Q. IL Q.Implementation m a H W i a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate Arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CIA-4 .1. ENG A, D 3 CM-4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1 ENG PW E, �' 3 Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E. F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and Improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Vf)NOWVDflo OH DNVN Action Ty pe .2y o General Plan Policy d c 0LD o D W N v a 121 ,�, Implementation Action(s) E a c o a a y a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to th? impacts caused by new development in Rancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for Cli O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A. D, 1 4 funding. CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A. E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19 Action L Ty pe 3 d General Plan Policy C y 3 R y O w S e ca h rr a O T Y implementation Action(s) AE O 5 `O_ a a ur a` ur � LL a` Implement street design standards per this General Plan, except that modified standards may be applied where appropriate on CM-1.5 O arterial corridors relating to transit, bicycle facilities, sidewalks, and on -street parking to be context sensitive to adjacent land uses and districts, and to all roadway users, including transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Integrate into the CIP process the planning of modified standards for Foothill Boulevard to accommodate BRT and for other arterials as ENG PL A, D, I 4 appropriate to reflect the bikeway plan and pedestrian improvements necessary to support Mixed Use districts. CM-1.6 O Pursue a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. Grade separations currently exist at Haven and Milliken Avenues. Due to truck traffic associated with the southeast industrial area, the City ENG PL A, E. 1 4 supports creating a railroad grade separation at Etiwanda Avenue and the BNSF Railway line. CM-2.1 O O Facilitate bicycling and walking citywide. Implement the Bicycle Master Plan included in the Community Mobility Chapter. Require that pedestrian facilities and connections be provided as part of all development projects, with an emphasis on connections within Mixed Use districts. Implement all bicyciing and walking policies and Mobility ENG PL, RD A, D, 1 4 Element components. Preparation and distribute bike route maps and bike facilities information. Publish and make readily available pedestrian route maps and pedestrian facilities information. Encourage all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles CM-2.2 O traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors. Same actions as identified for LU-2.1, LU-5.4, LU-5.6, and CM-2.1. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 CM-2.3 O Support the use of hybrid, electric, and low/zero emission vehicles. Continue to maintain the Green Team Sustainability Action Matrix that identifies current and proposed efforts that procure vehicles that includes providing gas -efficient vehicles. CM PL,AS, A, E, F 7 Amend the Development Code as appropriate to accommodate alternative fuel service stations and charging facilities. CM-2.4 O Replace City vehicles with energy -efficient and alternative fuel source models when replacing vehicles or adding to the City's fleet Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-20 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Ty pe a m General Plan Policy y E v A n d d = w w o r u A � O p e c o. Implementation Action(s) c ° Q. a n a ? w� _ u •c a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1, ENG A, D 3 CM4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW A. D 3 E. F Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A. D, 4 and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance D 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action i Ty pe a d General Plan Policy c m E m m a u u K _ u K C •— o H CD 01,�, 0 I mplementation Action(s) 0. a` rn 0. y 0: W a ED-3.7 O O Support access to local and regional educational resources that provide educational opportunities to local residents and workers. Coordinate with local and regional centers for higher education to promote access to and programs for additional educational opportunities. RD PL, CM A 4 ED4.1 O Encourage high -quality design for infill development and continue to support new high quality uses. Same action as identified for LU-5.1 to 5.6. PL A. I, K 4 ENG ED4.2 O Make green building and green busineri a priority. Same action as identified for LU-7.1 to 7.3. PL RD A. G 3 ED4.3 O O Improve connectivity between development projects to create a more cohesive atmosphere. Same action as identified for LU-2.3. PL ENG A 5 ED4A O Focus on enhancements to Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue. Same action as identified for LU5.1 to 5.6. PL A, I, K 5 ENG ED4.5 O Review and understand the fiscal, job creation, and economic benefits of new proposed uses in the CWs industrial zoned areas. Focus a special economic development effort on assessing where re -use or conversion of industrial properties to other uses could occur. Identify potential conflicts in order to develop a strategy for when such RD PL A, G 5 conversions could be considered a benefit versus a cost. ED-5.1 O Engage In regional transit planning efforts. Continue to be involved in planning efforts to address regional transportation solutions, particularly those providing transit options. In PL ENG A, K 4 particular, work with Omnitrans in its efforts to establish BRT service in Rancho Cucamonga. ED-5.2 O Continue to capitalize on proximity to Interstate 10, Interstate 15, State Route 210, and the LA/Ontario International Airport Review and assess the effectiveness of way -finding signage to ensure that the City's accessibility to 1-10, 1-15 and SR-210 from major areas of City commerce hubs is easily ascertained and facilitated. Begin RD PL, ENG A, G 4 programs to improve such signage where it is deficient or confusing. Maximize the benefits of a major airport just outside of the City's borders. Provide adequate park and recreational facilities that meet the City CS-1.1 O standard of 5.0 acres of parkland (Including trails and special facilities) for every 1,000 persons. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-31 Vf)NOWVDfID OHDNH'd Action L Ty pe a 0 > m General Plan Policy d m a L m r 0 a a Implementation Action(s) g' o o a ' w ` a q z aa CM- Continue to provide pedestrian amenities on sidewalks on major 311 O streets that are key pedestrian routes, including the provision of benches, shade trees, and trash cans. Identify key pedestrian travel corridors citywide, and prepare a Citywide Pedestrian Circulation Study to determine pedestrian amenity needs, capital and operating funding sources, and a phased implementation program. Develop a program for gradually installing public amenities such as streetlights, benches, trash containers, art, drinking fountains, ENG PL C' p 5 landscaping, etc. that will enhance the pedestrian environment and encourage increased use of transit. Use both the CIP process and other funding sources, including a program whereby businesses or residents may sponsor street furniture and/or landscaped areas. CM- Continue to require that the siting and architectural design of new 312 O development promote safety, pedestrian -friendly design, and access to transit facilities. Develop standards to be applied to development projects along transit PL ENG I 4 corridors that require transit and pedestrian accessibility. Establish a number of bike hubs in the City (centralized locations CM- O with convenient bike parking for trip destinations or transfer to 3.13 other transportation modes), at key transit nodes, and at commercial nodes. Conduct a study to determine the best locations for bike hubs in the City, and develop a plan, wayfinding program, and implementation process for ENG PL, RD A, B, 4 providing bike hubs that provide secure bicycle lockers, bike racks, and C D connections to transit at key locations in the City CM- O Enhance pedestrian and bicycle access to local and regional 3.14 transit, including facilitating connections to transit. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL 1 4 cm- Coordinate the provision of the non -motorized networks (bicycle 3.15 O and pedestrian) with adjacent jurisdictions to maximize sub - regional connectivity. Same action as identified for CM-3.7. ENG PL A, E, F 4 CM- O Establish fixed -route local circulator bus service connecting major 3.16 activity centers. Explore development of a fixed -route local circulator bus system, station ENG PL A, E. H 5 location, and funding mechanisms. Continue to implement traffic management and traffic signal CM-4 1 O operations measures along the arterial roadway to minimize delay and congestion for all modes, without adversely impacting transit, bicycles, and pedestrians. Appendix A. Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-25 Action Z� Ty pe e u General Plan Policy c d c. i' Z d M a. u ry m m o o 2^ 6 c o. Implementation Action(s) c = ;_ a a. to a 91 K U. a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A. D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic Row along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CM-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM-4 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures .3 and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW E, 3 FD, Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-44 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. ENG E. F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including nonautomobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance ENG D 4 access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN FUTURE & UNFUNDED RANCHO CUCAMONGA Action Ty pe a c3 General Plan Policy o y m > m N o: C •a p H u o o E !' c m Implementation Action(s) E a» c o a° a rn a` in K U. a Continue to provide a safe and efficient street system in the City, to CM-1.1 O support mobility goals, all transportation modes, and the goals of Managing the Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources Chapter. Add the intersection improvements listed below to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) or appropriate equivalents identified and approved by the City Engineer in the future that would offset the identified impacts; implement the improvements as funding becomes available. Prepare a report on the need for the improvements and their relationship to the impacts caused by new development in (tancho Cucamonga. • Work with Caltrans and SANBAG to implement a new freeway interchange at 1-15 and Arrow Highway. • Complete Wilson Avenue between Milliken Avenue and Day Creek Boulevard. ENG A, D, 1 7 • Complete Rochester Avenue between Banyan Street and Wilson Avenue. • Pursue Federal funds for a grade separation of the SPRR at Etiwanda Avenue. • Complete storm drain and widening of Hellman Avenue from Foothill Boulevard to Cucamonga Creek. • Complete Wilson Avenue from East Avenue to Wardman Bullock. • Improve the Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway Interchange. • Complete Youngs Canyon from Cherry Avenue to Banyan Street. Provide an integrated network of roadways that provides for CM-1.2 O convenient automobile, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation movement around the City. Same actions as identified for CM-2.1 and CM-3.7. ENG PL A, D, 1 4 Complete the circulation system by constructing new roadway CM-1.3 O facilities and freeway interchanges pursuant to the Circulation Plan (Figure CM-2). Identify in the CIP future projects and new roadways based on available ENG PL A, D, 1 4 funding. CM-1.4 O O Provide access for seniors and those with physical disabilities in all elements of the transportation system. Continue to operate the Silver Fox Express. Consult with Omnitrans regarding providing ACCESS transportation services. A. E. Require that all new future transportation facilities have appropriate and ENG CS F, H, I 4 adequate access for seniors and people with physical disabilities. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-19 Action L Ty pe a y General Plan Policy y oo, N 0 m C 2 K m N rn o o c �' oc s Implementation Action(s) E a a y Q. hrc v a Complete intersection capacity improvements, coordinate traffic signals utilizing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), and improve striping and signage. Striping shall maximize room for bike lanes where feasible and consistent with the Bicycle Plan. Modernize traffic signal equipment as necessary, and continue to update traffic signal timing and ENG PW A, D 3 synchronization plans to optimize traffic Flow along the key arterial corridors, taking into account the needs of transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians as well. Invest in the communications infrastructure necessary to operate a Citywide traffic signal control system. Continue to design and operate arterials and intersections for the CI,1-4.2 O safe operation of all modes, including transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG A, D 3 CM4.3 O Continue to implement Intelligent Transportation System Measures and advanced traffic management technologies where appropriate. Same action as identified for CM-4.1. ENG PW A. D' 3 E, Maintain the City's transportation infrastructure in good condition; CM-4.4 O O develop and maintain adequate funding sources for it's ongoing maintenance and upkeep. Continue to implement and follow the schedule for resurfacing streets ENG A, D, and streets improvements per the CIP. E, F 4 Continue to require that new development participates in the cost of CM-5.1 O transportation mitigation and improvements necessitated by new development, including non -automobile solutions. Require payment of Traffic Impact Fees as approved by the City Council, used to finance specific improvements made necessary by new development. The relationship between the fees, the cost of the ENG PL D 4 improvements, and new development has been established in fee analyses approved by the City Council. These fees shall be reviewed from time to time and adjusted as needed. Require evaluation of potential traffic and transportation impacts CM-5.2 O associated with new development prior to project approval, and require adequate mitigation measures, including non -automobile solutions, prior to, or concurrent with, project development. Require applicants to prepare traffic and transportation impact assessments consistent with adopted City guidelines and standards. Continue to require sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and connections to be ENG D 4 provided as part of new development projects to improve and enhance access between neighborhoods, and from neighborhoods to schools, parks, trails, commercial centers, and other activity centers. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-26 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action Ty pe a General Plan Policy d R O N Ix•C N ot C43 c`y O N a O A A O O C T+ 'o o. Implementation Action(s) E a w c o o a a w Q. m at u. a Expand recreation and cultural attractions to enhance ED-2.3 O tourismlvisitor potential and to boost sales and transient occupancy tax. Develop brochures or links from the City's web site to showcase the various recreational and cultural venues to attract visitors to the City. Enhancement of cultural amenities, including regional entertainment RD CS A 7 options, recreation, and historic preservation, will help to embellish the City's reputation as a destination for a wide range of visitors. Expand lodging choices in the. City through the recruitment and ED-2.4 O placement of full -service hotels that will complement the existing select -service hotel portfolio. Review and update marketing strategies (land surveys, infrastructure availability, and modes of transportation) to solicit the development of a full -service lodging facility. Make sure that zoning regulations can RD PL A, G 4 accommodate a full -service hotel at desired locations. ED3.1 O O Continue to make public safety a priority. Use the annual budgeting process to allocate funding for public safety services, equipment, and facilities commensurate with the City's service CM PD, FD A 6 objectives. ED-3.2 O Provide community and cultural amenities. Same action as identified for ED-2.3. CS CM, RD A 4 ED-3.3 O Maintain a healthy fiscal balance. Use the annual budgeting process to check that revenues from all sources continue to more than match projected spending. CM AS, FIN A, G 1 ED-3.4 O O Improve internal circulation for all modes of transportation, consistent with the concept of "Complete Streets". Same action as identified for LU-3.1 to 3.8. ENG PL A' G, 4 ED-3.5 O Facilitate development of additional local and regional entertainment venues. Focus a special economic development team on the task of working towards attracting developers and investors interested in responding to RD PL A. G 6 local and regional demand for new entertainment options. ED-3.6 O Leverage the City's quality of life amenities to attract more knowledge -based workers. Expand the Economic Development Strategy to market Rancho Cucamonga's civic assets, including parks, recreation and community RD PL, CS A, G 4 enrichment facilities and programs, trails, and quality school districts. Appendix A: Implementation Plan A-30 RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN Action I Ty pe General Plan Policy a m m a 2 m `Fy 1 « c y P C N _- __ - 0 o I u a m$ Implementation Action(s) c O a m e 0. r'a Ir ILLA. PL, AS, A B Same actions as identified for RC-4.1 to RC4.5. ENG ENG, C, E, 3 CM, BS, G, I PW, FIN Encourage development of transit -oriented and infill development, PS-12.3 O and encourage a mix of uses that foster walking and alternative transportation. Same action as identified for RC4.4. PL ENG A, 1 3 Provide enhanced bicycling and walking Infrastructure, and support PS-12.4 O public transit, including public bus service, the Metrolink, and the potential for But Rapid Transit (BRT). Same action as identified for RC4.4. PL ENG A. 1 3 Provide green building Incentives, assess green building techniques as a formal stage of project review, and develop a green PS-12.5 O building ordinance or program that addresses both new and existing buildings. Adaptation strategies will also include increased water efficiency in buildings. Same actions as identified for RC-6.1 to RC-6.4 PL BS A, I, K 4 ENG Encourage efforts to reduce waste generation and re -use and PS-12.6 O support increased recycling and composting opportunities with a focus on large commercial and Industrial waste producers. Same action as identified for PF-7,1. ENG PL A 3 PS-12.7 O O Support tree planting, planting more vegetation (including native and drought -resistant planting), and preservation of open space. Same actions as identified for RC-1.1, RC-8.1 to RC-8.7. PL ENGPW ' A, I 4 PS-12.8 O Develop green procurement plans and ensure energy savings in City operations and maintenance. Same actions as identified for RC-5.1 to RC-5.3. AS CM, FIN, A,B, C, 4 PW E, K Develop energy- or climate change-themed publications and workshops, facilitating energy audits for residents, and establishing PS-12.9 O partnerships to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Increase public awareness about climate change, and encourage residents and businesses to become involved in activities and lifestyle changes that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Same action as identified for RC-5.1. CM ENG A, K 4 Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing or revising community and/or specific PS-13.1 O plans and when reviewing development proposals. The contour map depicting future noise levels (Figure PS-10) should be used by the City as a guide to land use/noise compatibility. Appendix A: Implementation Plan RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN A-57