Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020/04/15 - Agenda Packet
AGENDA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD -HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY - SUCCESSOR AGENCY - PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY - CITY COUNCIL Wednesday, April 15, 2020 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 REGULAR MEETINGS: 1st and 3rd Wednesdays - 7:00 P.M. ORDER OF BUSINESS: CLOSED SESSION TRI -COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS: MAYOR L. Dennis Michael CITY MANAGER John R. Gillison MAYOR PRO TEM Lynne B. Kennedy CITYATTORNEY James L. Markman COUNCIL Ryan A. Hutchison CITY CLERK Janice C. Reynolds MEMBERS Kristine D. Scott CITY TREASURER James C. Frost Sam Spagnolo In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings. Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in one of the following ways: Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or Local Cable: RCTV3 Programming Members of the public wishing to speak during public communication, or a public hearing will need to dial in to (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID-19 virus. If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774-2023, 24 hours prior to the meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements. Page 1 INFORMATION FOR THE PUBLIC �FiQ OUCAMONGA TO ADDRESS THE FIRE BOARD, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL The Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council encourage free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the Agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinanceAuthority and City Council by filling out a speaker card and submitting it to the City Clerk. The speaker cards are located on the wall at the back of the Chambers, at the front desk behind the staff table and at the City Clerk's desk. Any handouts for the Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority or City Council should be given to the City Clerk for distribution. During "Public Communications," your name will be called to speak on any item listed or not listed on the agenda in the order in which it was received. The "Public Communications" period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other "Public Communications" which have not concluded during this one-hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. If you are present to speak on an "Advertised Public Hearing" or on an "Administrative Hearing" Item(s), your name will be alled when that item is being discussed, in the order in which it was received. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Chair, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. AGENDA BACK-UP MATERIALS Staff reports and back-up materials for agenda items are available for review at the City Clerk's counter, the City's Public Libraries and on the City's website. A complete copy of the agenda is also available at the desk located behind the staff table during the Council meeting. LIVE BROADCAST Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council meetings are broadcast live on Channel 3 for those with cable television access. Meetings are rebroadcast on the second and fourth Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. Streaming Video on Demand is available on the City's website at www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas. The Fire Board, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council meet regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Copies of the agendas and minutes can be found @ www.cityofrc.us If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Please silence all cell phones and devices while the meeting is in session. Page 2 APRIL 15, 2020 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 P.M. Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION - Tri -Communities Conference Room D.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED GENERALLY AT NORTH WEST CORNER OF CIVIC CENTER DRIVE AND HAVEN AVENUE ALSO KNOWN AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0208- 331-47-0000, AND 0208-331-40-0000 ; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND STEVE PONTELL, NATIONAL COMMUNITY RENAISSANCE.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY D.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9789 MAIN STREET IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-062-02-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CAROL NORRIS, NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY D.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090-331-03-0000, 1090-331-04-0000, 1089-581-04-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY DA. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-272-11, 0209-143-21, AND 0209-272-22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND MICHAEL DIEDEN REPRESENTING EMPIRE YARDS AT RANCHO, LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. - CITY D.5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, Page 3 CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — CITY D.6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8810 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229131-07; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES, TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 2/3 INTEREST AND BONNIE CATHRYN STRACK & WILLIAM R. RUSHING, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE STRACK FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 13, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/3 INTEREST, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS — CITY D.7. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932 AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP. — CITY E. RECESS CLOSED SESSION TO RECESS TO THE REGULAR FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS AT CITY HALL, LOCATED AT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA. REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY, AND CITY COUNCIL WILL BE CALLED TO ORDER. IT IS THE INTENT TO CONCLUDE THE MEETINGS BY 10:00 P.M., UNLESS EXTENDED BY CONCURRENCE OF THE FIRE BOARD, AGENCIES, AUTHORITY BOARD AND COUNCIL. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT/ PRESENTATIONS A.1. Recognition of the 2020 Chaffey College Panther Basketball Team. --- B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of Page 4 public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Fire Board/Housing Successor Agency/Successor Agency/Authority Board/Council Member for discussion. C. CONSENT CALENDAR - FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT C.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. 01 C.2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $721,643.36 and Weekly Check 17 Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $233,023.33 Dated March 23, 2020 Through April 05, 2020. C.3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas 29 Company in the Amount of $1,128.07 Dated March 23, 2020 Through April 05, 2020. CA. Consideration of an Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Standard Offer, Agreement and 31 Escrow Instruction Between Birtcher Development, LLC and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District for the Acquisition of Two (2) Parcels of Vacant Land and Approve an Appropriation in the Amount of $817,470. D. CONSENT CALENDAR - HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY 9 D.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. E. CONSENT CALENDAR - SUCCESSOR AGENCY 9 E.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. F. CONSENT CALENDAR - PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY F.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. 9 G. CONSENT CALENDAR- CITY COUNCIL N G.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. G.2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,424,791.16 and Weekly Check 37 Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $2,686,090.53 Dated March 23, 2020 Through April 05, 2020. G.3. Consideration to Approve Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas 49 Company in the Amount of $14,840.61 Dated March 23, 2020 Through April 05, 2020. GA. Consideration of a Resolution to Vacate a Portion of Right -of -Way on the South Side of Hillside 51 Road Between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue Related to Case No. SUBTPM19855, Submitted by Monte Vista Assets, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-017 54 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RELATED TO CASE NO. SUBTPM19855 G.5. Consideration to Approve Tract Map 20042, Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, 57 and Ordering the Annexation into Landscape Maintenance District 1, and into Street Light Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2 Located on the East Side of Carnelian Avenue, North of Hillside Avenue, Related to Case No. SUBTT20042, and Submitted by New Weaver Lane, LLC. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 60 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. SUBTT20042 Page 5 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-021 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 6-55 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT20042 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 70 CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT20042 G.6. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the Northwest Corner of 4th Street and Utica 75 per the Improvement Agreement, related to Parcel Map 19823, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. G.7. Consideration of a Crossing Surface Installation Agreement with BNSF Railway Company 78 (BNSF) for the Installation of New Concrete Panels on Arrow Route at Railroad Spur Crossing. G.8. Consideration of a License Agreement for Electric Supply Undercrossing on 7th Street West of 855 Haven Avenue with BNSF Railway Company. G.9. Consideration of a Contract with All American Asphalt in the Amount of $196,232, Plus a 10% 105 Contingency for the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project. G.10. Consideration to Schedule a Public Hearing for Placement of Liens for Delinquent Solid Waste 10g Accounts. G.11. Consideration to Approve the Appropriation of Funds for FY19/20 in the Amount of $223,235.00 110 for Contract Design Services for the Central Park Dog Park. H. CONSENT ORDINANCES The following Ordinances have been introduced for first reading. Second readings are expected to be routine and non -controversial. The City Council will act upon them at one time without discussion. The City Clerk will read the title. Any item can be removed for discussion by a Council Member. I. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM 112 1.1. Consideration of Urgency Ordinance No. 968, Amendment to Urgency Ordinance No. 967, Extending Emergency Regulations Related to Commercial Tenant Evictions. URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 968 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO 114 CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL TENANT EVICTIONS AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF 1.2. Consideration of Notice to San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors Regarding 1 1 7 Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MEHKOs). J. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS - CITY COUNCIL/FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT J.1. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE COMMUNITY 121 DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. J.2. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING 310 COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017 -00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018 -00473 — PAUL BARDOS, Applicant. This Project Consists of a Site Plan and Architectural Review of a Proposed 4,118 Square Foot Two Story, Single family Residence With an Attached 771 Square Foot Garage and a Request to Construct Retaining Walls Up to 5 Feet and 2 Inches High on a 15,430 Square Foot Lot Within the Low (L) Residential District and Within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera APN: 0207- 631- 03. A Minor Exception Was Also Requested to Exceed the Maximum Height Limit for Retaining Walls in The Zone. This Item Was Determined to be Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (13)(4) As A Project That Has Been Rejected Or Disapproved (This Item Was Page 6 Continued from the February 19, 2020 City Council Meeting). J.3. PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING 438 COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM, APPLICANT. The Project Consists of a Site Plan and Architectural Review of a 103,945 Square Foot Warehouse Distribution Building on 4.75 Acres of Land in The General Industrial (GI) District on the East Side of Pecan Avenue South of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines Under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 687 CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0229-171-02 K. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORTS K.1. Consideration to a Adopt Resolution of the City Council Ratifying Executive Order 2020-2 of the 693 Director of Emergency Services. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 695 CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-2 TO SUSPEND ANIMAL LICENSE PENALTIES, DEFER A PORTION OF TOW SERVICE AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, PERMIT SIGNAGE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR ESSENTIAL BUSINESSES, AND PERMIT THE USE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND TRAILERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMPLYING WITH PUBLIC HEALTH ORDERS DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC L. COUNCIL BUSINESS L.1. Consideration to Approve the City Council Mission, Vision, Values, Goals, and Code of Ethics; 702 and to adopt a Resolution of Commitment to Unified Governance. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-024 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, 708 CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS COMMITMENT TO UNIFIED GOVERNANCE L.2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) L.3. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES --- (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) M. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING N. ADJOURNMENT CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy -Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website. Page 7 Page 8 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: REGULAR MEETINGS OF APRIL 1, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Meeting Minutes of Regular Meetings of April 1, 2020. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - 4/1/2020 MINUTES Page 9 April 1, 2020 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CLOSED SESSION, FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council held a closed session on Wednesday April 1, 2020, in the Tri - Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 4:30 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. No public communications were made. No discussion or actions were taken. D.1. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090-331-03-0000, 1090-331-04-0000, 1089-581-04-0000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS.; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. -CITY D.2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA METROLINK STATION IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 0209-272-11, 0209-143-21, AND 0209-272-22; NEGOTIATING PARTIES CITY MANAGER JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CARRIE SCHINDLER REPRESENTING SBCTA, AND MICHAEL DIEDEN REPRESENTING EMPIRE YARDS AT RANCHO, LLC; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — CITY *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 7 Page 10 D.3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9763 8TH STREET, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND TAI NGO, LEE & ASSOCIATES; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS - CITY D.4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8783 ETIWANDA AVENUE/12949 WHITTRAM AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229-162-14; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND KULAR TRUCK LINE, INC., OWNER; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS - CITY D. 5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8810 ETIWANDA AVENUE, FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0229131-07; NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND WILLIAM A. JONES AND JOAN F. JONES,TRUSTEES OF THE JONES FAMILY TRUST OF 2010, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 2/3 INTEREST AND BONNIE CATHRYN STRACK & WILLIAM R. RUSHING, AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE STRACK FAMILY TRUST, DATED MARCH 13, 2014, AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/3 INTEREST, OWNERS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS - CITY D.6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, CASE NO. CIV DS 1937969 D.7. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA). - CITY The closed session recessed at 6:00 p.m. The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on April 1, 2020 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney and Patricia Bravo -Valdez, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy led the Pledge of Allegiance *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 7 Page 11 Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19), and social distancing requirements, City Manager Gillison announced that due to recent changes in Brown Act provisions by Governor Newsom, the public comment portion of the meeting will be held telephonically. Mr. Gillison announced that members of the public can watch the meeting by television on RCTV3 programming or online at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council- agendas and attendance at the meeting is limited to individuals that have items on the agenda. He stated that members of the public can make comments by calling (909) 774-2751. This is in accordance with the County of San Bernardino guidelines to help stop the spread of the Coronavirus. Additional information on the Coronavirus pandemic and City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus. A.1. Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of April 2020 as "Donate Life Month". Mayor Michael virtually presented Living Donor and Donate Life Ambassador, Cheryl Machan, with a Proclamation declaring the month of April as "Donate Life Month." Mayor Michael announced that due to COVID-19 and recommended social distancing, Donate Life made the decision earlier this month to go virtual with their annual Donate Life Run/Walk to take place on April 25, 2020. He invited the public to register at DonateLifeRunWalk.org. Mayor Michael announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, the Public Communications portion of the meeting will be conducted telephonically. Fernando Cerrillo, Operations Manager, Pepe's Towing Co., phoned in and expressed support of towing service fee adjustments and asked the City to work with City contracted towing companies by suspending or reducing current franchise fees, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. C.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of March 18, 2020. C.2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $683,377.26 and Weekly Check Registers (No Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of $844,757.40 Dated March 09, 2020 Through March 22, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of February in the Amount of $549,976.70. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Hutchison, to approve Consent Calendar Items C1. through C2. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 3 of 7 Page 12 Item D1, E1, and F1 were taken concurrently. D.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of March 18, 2020. E.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of March 18, 2020. F.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of March 18, 2020. MOTION: Moved by Vice -Chair Kennedy, seconded by Agency Member Scott, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1, E1, and F1 of the Housing Successor, Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. G.1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes: Regular Meetings of March 18, 2020. G.2. Consideration to Approve Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Amount of $1,159,899.23 and Weekly Check Registers (No checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Amount of$6,240,237.38 Dated March 09, 2020 Through March 22, 2020 and Electronic Debit Register for the Month of February in the Amount of $1,852,056.24 G.3. Consideration of Reappointment of Two Committee Members to the Community Parks and Landscape Citizens' Oversight Committee. GA. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with PrimeGov Solutions, LLC, for an Agenda Meeting Management System, in an amount not to exceed $20,000 for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and a total contract amount not to exceed $110,000. G.S. Consideration of Resolution No. 2020-016, Declaring a Trusted System for the Management of City and Fire Protection District Official Records. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-016 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING A TRUSTED SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF CITY AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT OFFICIAL RECORDS G.6. Consideration to Award a Contract to Landscape West Management Services, Inc. for LMD 2 Parkway Paseo and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance. G.7. Consideration to Award a Contract to Mariposa Landscapes, Inc. for LMD 4R Parkway Paseo and Median Island Landscape and Irrigation Maintenance. *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 4 of 7 Page 13 G. 8. Consideration to Award Contract to Siemens Mobility, Inc. for the "Traffic Signal Battery Backup System Replacement FY 19-20 Project". G.9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on Almond Street and Almond Avenue Per Improvement Agreement Related to Parcel Map 19615 As Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. G.10. Consideration of Amendment No. 02 to Professional Services Agreement with Magellan Advisors, LLC (CO18-103) in the Amount of $40,000 for Fiscal Year 2019/20 and Authorize an Appropriation in the Amount of $40,000 from the Fiber Optic Network Fund for Design Services. GA 1. Consideration to Approve Addendum No. 5 to the Utility Services Agreement with the City of Riverside Public Utilities (CO#2010-139) for a 3 -Year Contract Extension. G.12. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Allocating the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program Funds for Fiscal Year 2020/21. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-018 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PROJECTS FOR THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUNDS G.13. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for The Safety Lighting Installation Project at Terra Vista Parkway and Spruce Avenue. G.14. Consideration to Authorize Appropriation and Approve the Purchase of a Cannabis Abatement Trailer from The Drug Abatement Act Fund. G.15. Consideration to Schedule a Public Hearing for May 20, 2020 for Placement of Liens for Abatement Services. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar Items G1 through G15. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. No items. No items. No items. *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 5 of 7 Page 14 K.1. Consideration to Adopt Resolutions of the City Council and the Fire Protection District Board of Directors Ratifying Executive Order 2020-1 of the Director of Emergency Services. RESOLUTION NO. 2020-019 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-1 TO SUSPEND BUSINESS LICENSE PENALTIES AND ADMINISTRATIVE CITATIONS, AND MODIFY REFUND PROCEDURES FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT, DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (City) RESOLUTION NO. FD2020-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT RATIFYING THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-1 TO WAIVE, DEFER, OR SUSPEND CERTAIN FEES AND INSPECTIONS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC (Fire) City Manager Gillison introduced the item and gave the Staff Report for item K1. Mr. Gillison provided a PowerPoint presentation updating the City Council and Fire District Board of Directors with a timeline of current COVID-19 emergency actions and a summary of Emergency Executive Order 2020-1. Mr. Gillison recommended that the City Council and Fire District Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 2020-019 and Resolution No. FD2020-003. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No. 2020-019, Ratifying the Director of Emergency Services' Executive Order 2020-1 to Suspend Business License Penalties and Administrative Citations, and Modify Refund Procedures for the Community Services Department, During the Local Emergency Caused by The Covid-19 Pandemic. (City). Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Vice -President Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. FD2020-003, Ratifying the Director of Emergency Services' Executive Order 2020-1 to Waive, Defer, Or Suspend Certain Fees and Inspections of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District During the Local Emergency Caused by the Covid-19 Pandemic. (Fire). Motion carried unanimously, 5-0. L.1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Scott thanked City staff and residents for their support and donations during a city hosted drive- Thru donation event held at Central Park to help collect items for Rancho Cucamonga's 65+ Senior Community in need of resources during the COVID-19 Pandemic. The event was hosted by the Community Services Department. Council Member Hutchison encouraged residents to continue following CDC guidelines of social distancing, avoid congregating and unnecessary travel to help flatten the COVID-19 curve. Mr. Hutchison affirmed that Rancho Cucamonga will persevere as a Community. L.2. INTER -AGENCY UPDATES *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 6 of 7 Page 15 Council Member Spagnolo provided an update on OmniTrans Transportation Services in response to the COVID- 19 Pandemic. He advised no bus fares would be collected from onboarding passengers and that there will be reduced bus services for most bus routes due to a decline in ridership through Sunday, April 19, 2020. No items. Mayor Michael thanked and expressed gratitude to City staff and residents for their support and kindness during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 7:16 p.m. Approved: Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director *DRAFT* April 1, 20201 Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 7 of 7 Page 16 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $721,643.36 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS (EXCLUDING CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY) IN THE AMOUNT OF $233,023.33 DATED MARCH 23, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 05, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented.. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Page 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010365 03/25/2020 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 979.20 0.00 979.20 AP 00010366 03/25/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 20,374.75 0.00 20,374.75 AP 00010367 03/25/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 22,555.12 0.00 22,555.12 AP 00010368 03/25/2020 BALANCE 4 LIFE FITNESS 4 WELLNESS INC 368.00 0.00 368.00 AP 00010369 03/25/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,172.14 0.00 23,172.14 AP 00010370 03/25/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 18,203.90 0.00 18,203.90 AP 00010371 03/25/2020 HAMPTON YOGA 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00010372 03/25/2020 INDERWEISCHE, MATT 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00010373 03/25/2020 MOFFATT & NICHOL 165,456.28 0.00 165,456.28 AP 00010374 03/25/2020 ORONA, PATRICIA 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00010375 03/25/2020 RCCEA 1,908.00 0.00 1,908.00 AP 00010376 03/25/2020 RCPFA 12,449.28 0.00 12,449.28 AP 00010377 03/25/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 159.81 0.00 159.81 AP 00010378 03/25/2020 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 260,016.09 0.00 260,016.09 AP 00010379 03/25/2020 TICKETS.COM 45,295.84 0.00 45,295.84 AP 00010380 03/26/2020 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010381 03/26/2020 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010382 03/26/2020 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010383 03/26/2020 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010384 03/26/2020 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010385 03/26/2020 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010386 03/26/2020 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010387 03/26/2020 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010388 03/26/2020 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,189.23 1,189.23 AP 00010389 03/26/2020 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010390 03/26/2020 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010391 03/26/2020 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010392 03/26/2020 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010393 03/26/2020 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010394 03/26/2020 COX, KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010395 03/26/2020 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010396 03/26/2020 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010397 03/26/2020 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010398 03/26/2020 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010399 03/26/2020 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010400 03/26/2020 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010401 03/26/2020 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010402 03/26/2020 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010403 03/26/2020 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010404 03/26/2020 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010405 03/26/2020 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010406 03/26/2020 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010407 03/26/2020 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010408 03/26/2020 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010409 03/26/2020 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010410 03/26/2020 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010411 03/26/2020 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010412 03/26/2020 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00010413 03/26/2020 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00010414 03/26/2020 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010415 03/26/2020 LONGO, JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010416 03/26/2020 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010417 03/26/2020 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010418 03/26/2020 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010419 03/26/2020 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010420 03/26/2020 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010421 03/26/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010422 03/26/2020 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00010423 03/26/2020 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010424 03/26/2020 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010425 03/26/2020 NEE, RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010426 03/26/2020 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010427 03/26/2020 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00010428 03/26/2020 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00010429 03/26/2020 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,280.32 1,280.32 AP 00010430 03/26/2020 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010431 03/26/2020 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010432 03/26/2020 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010433 03/26/2020 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010434 03/26/2020 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010435 03/26/2020 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010436 03/26/2020 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010437 03/26/2020 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 2,154.28 2,154.28 AP 00010438 03/26/2020 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010439 03/26/2020 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010440 03/26/2020 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010441 03/26/2020 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00010442 03/26/2020 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010443 03/26/2020 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010444 03/26/2020 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010445 03/26/2020 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010446 03/26/2020 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010447 03/26/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 628.93 0.00 628.93 AP 00010448 03/26/2020 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 386.75 386.75 AP 00010449 03/26/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 377.71 377.71 AP 00010450 03/26/2020 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,502.69 0.00 3,502.69 AP 00010451 03/26/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 410.51 0.00 410.51 AP 00010452 03/26/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 554.28 0.00 554.28 AP 00010453 03/26/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 262.90 0.00 262.90 AP 00010454 03/26/2020 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 336.18 0.00 336.18 AP 00010455 03/26/2020 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,115.12 0.00 1,115.12 AP 00010456 03/26/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,249.77 0.00 3,249.77 AP 00010457 03/26/2020 HOSE MAN INC 62.97 130.87 193.84 *** AP 00010458 03/26/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 2,408.43 2,408.43 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00010459 03/26/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 431.21 510.71 941.92 *** AP 00010460 03/26/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 49.57 0.00 49.57 AP 00010461 03/26/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 14,329.56 0.00 14,329.56 AP 00010462 03/26/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 158.05 0.00 158.05 AP 00010463 03/26/2020 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,099.40 0.00 1,099.40 AP 00010464 03/26/2020 SUNRISE FORD 74.86 0.00 74.86 AP 00010465 03/26/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 471.31 0.00 471.31 AP 00010466 03/26/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 3,376.05 0.00 3,376.05 AP 00010467 04/01/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 47,314.65 0.00 47,314.65 AP 00010468 04/01/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 2,042.88 0.00 2,042.88 AP 00010469 04/01/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 4,188.44 0.00 4,188.44 AP 00010470 04/01/2020 TICKETS.COM 21,044.42 0.00 21,044.42 AP 00010471 04/02/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 214.97 0.00 214.97 AP 00010472 04/02/2020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 67.50 0.00 67.50 AP 00010473 04/02/2020 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,188.78 0.00 3,188.78 AP 00010474 04/02/2020 CRAFCOINC 4,491.59 0.00 4,491.59 AP 00010475 04/02/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,156.46 0.00 1,156.46 AP 00010476 04/02/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 648.66 0.00 648.66 AP 00010477 04/02/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 8,139.87 8,139.87 AP 00010478 04/02/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 545.64 545.64 AP 00010479 04/02/2020 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 290.93 0.00 290.93 AP 00010480 04/02/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 183.18 0.00 183.18 AP 00010482 04/02/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 5,245.26 0.00 5,245.26 AP 00010484 04/02/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 354,202.97 0.00 354,202.97 AP 00010485 04/02/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 769.98 0.00 769.98 AP 00010486 04/02/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 1,057.57 0.00 1,057.57 AP 00408572 03/25/2020 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC 97.18 0.00 97.18 AP 00408573 03/25/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 0.00 1,520.79 1,520.79 AP 00408574 03/25/2020 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00408575 03/25/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00408576 03/25/2020 ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS LOCKBOX 33,056.00 3,104.00 36,160.00 *** AP 00408577 03/25/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 1,244.62 1,244.62 AP 00408578 03/25/2020 ALLSTATE PAYMENT PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 803.91 803.91 AP 00408579 03/25/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 392.21 0.00 392.21 AP 00408580 03/25/2020 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00408581 03/25/2020 AROCHO, ALMA 1,447.80 0.00 1,447.80 AP 00408582 03/25/2020 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 233.60 0.00 233.60 AP 00408583 03/25/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,355.00 0.00 1,355.00 AP 00408584 03/25/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 36,339.00 0.00 36,339.00 AP 00408585 03/25/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 732.50 0.00 732.50 AP 00408586 03/25/2020 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 571.47 0.00 571.47 AP 00408587 03/25/2020 BAST, KAROLYN 236.68 0.00 236.68 AP 00408588 03/25/2020 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 39.87 0.00 39.87 AP 00408589 03/25/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 51.38 51.38 AP 00408590 03/25/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 900.85 0.00 900.85 AP 00408591 03/25/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 1,131.75 1,131.75 AP 00408592 03/25/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 40,099.72 0.00 40,099.72 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire AP 00408593 03/25/2020 BROWN, JENNIFER 39.86 0.00 AP 00408594 03/25/2020 C V W D 106.25 0.00 AP 00408600 03/25/2020 C V W D 69,721.77 978.24 AP 00408601 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 AP 00408602 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 AP 00408603 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 AP 00408604 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 AP 00408605 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 AP 00408606 03/25/2020 CALIN, ANGELA 866.00 0.00 AP 00408607 03/25/2020 CART RETRIEVAL INC 285.00 0.00 AP 00408608 03/25/2020 CARTY, DIANE 396.00 0.00 AP 00408609 03/25/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,027.48 360.42 AP 00408610 03/25/2020 CLARK, KAREN 990.00 0.00 AP 00408611 03/25/2020 COCKRELL, JEANNE 22.00 0.00 AP 00408612 03/25/2020 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 4,124.40 0.00 AP 00408613 03/25/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 2,820.90 0.00 AP 00408614 03/25/2020 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 181.83 0.00 AP 00408615 03/25/2020 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,724.10 0.00 AP 00408616 03/25/2020 CROWE, DEBBIE 250.00 0.00 AP 00408617 03/25/2020 CURRAN, LISA 250.00 0.00 AP 00408618 03/25/2020 D & D SERVICES INC. 451.50 0.00 AP 00408619 03/25/2020 DANCE TERRIFIC 3,950.10 0.00 AP 00408620 03/25/2020 DATA TICKET INC 6,303.43 0.00 AP 00408621 03/25/2020 DOBOS, JAMES L. 18.00 0.00 AP 00408622 03/25/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 154.35 0.00 AP 00408623 03/25/2020 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 849.60 0.00 AP 00408624 03/25/2020 EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 650.40 0.00 AP 00408625 03/25/2020 EASTERLING, RAY 228.00 0.00 AP 00408626 03/25/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,403.75 0.00 AP 00408627 03/25/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 155.16 0.00 AP 00408628 03/25/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 1,800.00 0.00 AP 00408629 03/25/2020 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 0.00 373.00 AP 00408630 03/25/2020 ESPARZA, BLANCA 1,157.19 0.00 AP 00408631 03/25/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 67.72 0.00 AP 00408632 03/25/2020 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 162.00 0.00 AP 00408633 03/25/2020 FIRSTCARBON SOLUTIONS 5,077.05 0.00 AP 00408634 03/25/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC 1,200.00 0.00 AP 00408635 03/25/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 981.29 0.00 AP 00408636 03/25/2020 FORTIN LAW GROUP 348.90 0.00 AP 00408637 03/25/2020 FOSTER, TERESA 100.00 0.00 AP 00408638 03/25/2020 FRONTIER COMM 623.82 460.40 AP 00408639 03/25/2020 GASTON, ROBERT 250.00 0.00 AP 00408640 03/25/2020 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 270.00 0.00 AP 00408641 03/25/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 610.00 0.00 AP 00408642 03/25/2020 GILLISON, JOHN 29.36 0.00 AP 00408643 03/25/2020 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 54.24 0.00 AP 00408644 03/25/2020 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 Amount 39.86 106.25 70,700.01 100.00 314.11 8.44 342.73 30.00 866.00 285.00 396.00 1,387.90 990.00 22.00 4,124.40 2,820.90 181.83 1,724.10 250.00 250.00 451.50 3,950.10 6,303.43 18.00 154.35 849.60 650.40 228.00 3,403.75 155.16 1,800.00 373.00 *** *** 1,157.19 67.72 162.00 5,077.05 1,200.00 981.29 348.90 100.00 1,084.22 *** 250.00 270.00 610.00 29.36 54.24 50.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408645 03/25/2020 GONZALEZ, CATHY 52.50 0.00 52.50 AP 00408646 03/25/2020 GONZALEZ, JOSE CRUZ 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 AP 00408647 03/25/2020 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00408648 03/25/2020 GRAINGER 104.81 0.00 104.81 AP 00408649 03/25/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,034.40 0.00 1,034.40 AP 00408650 03/25/2020 GRAYDON, RONALD 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00408651 03/25/2020 GUGOL, FE 38.00 0.00 38.00 AP 00408652 03/25/2020 GUTIERREZ, DIANNE 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00408653 03/25/2020 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 1,680.00 0.00 1,680.00 AP 00408654 03/25/2020 HANDTEVY PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY STANDARDS 0.00 3,819.37 3,819.37 AP 00408655 03/25/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 528.00 0.00 528.00 AP 00408656 03/25/2020 HO, HOWARD 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00408657 03/25/2020 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 298.35 0.00 298.35 AP 00408658 03/25/2020 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC 37.98 0.00 37.98 AP 00408659 03/25/2020 HUBBERT, JAMES LIDELL 39.00 0.00 39.00 AP 00408660 03/25/2020 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00408661 03/25/2020 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00408662 03/25/2020 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 323.00 0.00 323.00 AP 00408663 03/25/2020 INTELESYS 4,828.69 0.00 4,828.69 AP 00408664 03/25/2020 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 4,088.00 0.00 4,088.00 AP 00408665 03/25/2020 IZQUIERDO, NELLY 286.40 0.00 286.40 AP 00408666 03/25/2020 JERROLD, JESSICA 107.00 0.00 107.00 AP 00408667 03/25/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 2,252.40 0.00 2,252.40 AP 00408668 03/25/2020 KARASEK, CHRISTINE 1,219.00 0.00 1,219.00 AP 00408669 03/25/2020 KEITH, JORRY 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00408670 03/25/2020 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 44.00 0.00 44.00 AP 00408671 03/25/2020 LANE, TRAVIS 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00408672 03/25/2020 LEE, KYOUNG HEE 86.06 0.00 86.06 AP 00408673 03/25/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 23,707.15 23,707.15 AP 00408674 03/25/2020 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 132.75 132.75 AP 00408675 03/25/2020 LOPEZ, PEDRO 3,796.00 0.00 3,796.00 AP 00408676 03/25/2020 LYNBERG & WATKINS 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00408677 03/25/2020 MARGARET LAMB & ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 76,000.00 0.00 76,000.00 AP 00408678 03/25/2020 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,900.80 0.00 1,900.80 AP 00408679 03/25/2020 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARDS 561.00 0.00 561.00 AP 00408680 03/25/2020 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00408681 03/25/2020 MAZOR, MARYA 1,133.00 0.00 1,133.00 AP 00408682 03/25/2020 MCCAUSLAND, AMANDA 302.64 0.00 302.64 AP 00408683 03/25/2020 MCGARRY, DARCY 25.12 0.00 25.12 AP 00408684 03/25/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00408685 03/25/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 279.63 279.63 AP 00408686 03/25/2020 MEDRANO, CELESTE 26.93 0.00 26.93 AP 00408687 03/25/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 212.50 0.00 212.50 AP 00408688 03/25/2020 MOE, JOHN 199.50 0.00 199.50 AP 00408689 03/25/2020 MORRIS, RICHARD 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00408690 03/25/2020 MOUSSA, JANET 285.00 0.00 285.00 AP 00408691 03/25/2020 MURASKA, DORINA 16.00 0.00 16.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408692 03/25/2020 NICHOLAS E ROSE MEDICAL CONSULTING INC 3,612.50 0.00 3,612.50 AP 00408693 03/25/2020 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP 751.52 0.00 751.52 AP 00408694 03/25/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 6,147.50 37,088.50 43,236.00 *** AP 00408696 03/25/2020 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00408697 03/25/2020 ONWARD ENGINEERING 29,640.00 0.00 29,640.00 AP 00408698 03/25/2020 OTT, LAURA 882.00 0.00 882.00 AP 00408699 03/25/2020 OTT, SHARON 259.20 0.00 259.20 AP 00408700 03/25/2020 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 869.40 0.00 869.40 AP 00408701 03/25/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00408702 03/25/2020 PARSONS, KARYN 346.50 0.00 346.50 AP 00408703 03/25/2020 PLACEWORKS 3,793.86 0.00 3,793.86 AP 00408704 03/25/2020 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00408705 03/25/2020 PORTERFIELD, JULIE 125.84 0.00 125.84 AP 00408706 03/25/2020 POSTAL PERFECT 315.00 0.00 315.00 AP 00408707 03/25/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00408708 03/25/2020 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,309.00 0.00 1,309.00 AP 00408709 03/25/2020 QUINTANA, CHRISTINE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408710 03/25/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,229.37 0.00 2,229.37 AP 00408711 03/25/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00408712 03/25/2020 RAMAKER, DANIELLE 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00408713 03/25/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00408714 03/25/2020 RECREATION RESULTS 4,780.00 0.00 4,780.00 AP 00408715 03/25/2020 RENTERIA, HOLLY 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408716 03/25/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,200.00 0.00 3,200.00 AP 00408717 03/25/2020 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 51,824.50 0.00 51,824.50 AP 00408718 03/25/2020 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 256.87 0.00 256.87 AP 00408719 03/25/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00408720 03/25/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00408721 03/25/2020 SABIO, KINI 456.00 0.00 456.00 AP 00408722 03/25/2020 SAGE OAK SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00408723 03/25/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 13,364.71 13,364.71 AP 00408724 03/25/2020 SASSOON, LORI 202.30 0.00 202.30 AP 00408725 03/25/2020 SBPEA 2,576.96 0.00 2,576.96 AP 00408726 03/25/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 15,516.15 15,516.15 AP 00408727 03/25/2020 SCHWARTZ, STEPHANIE KURLEY 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00408728 03/25/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00408729 03/25/2020 SHRED PROS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00408730 03/25/2020 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 25,677.96 0.00 25,677.96 AP 00408731 03/25/2020 SMIDERLE, FRANK 41.68 0.00 41.68 AP 00408732 03/25/2020 SMITH, JAYMI LEE 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00408734 03/25/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00408735 03/25/2020 SONG, CHUANHONG 69.86 0.00 69.86 AP 00408736 03/25/2020 SORIANO, HELEN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00408737 03/25/2020 SOUPCOFF, THOMAS 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00408740 03/25/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,770.08 0.00 9,770.08 AP 00408741 03/25/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,360.41 0.00 1,360.41 AP 00408742 03/25/2020 STEPPIN OUT BALLROOM 525.00 0.00 525.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408743 03/25/2020 STEPPING THRU ACCESSIBILITY 4,965.00 0.00 4,965.00 AP 00408744 03/25/2020 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 575.00 0.00 575.00 AP 00408745 03/25/2020 STREAMING MEDIA LIVE 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00408746 03/25/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 AP 00408747 03/25/2020 THOMAS, ORLEATHA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408748 03/25/2020 TICKETS.COM 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00408749 03/25/2020 TIREHUB LLC 1,101.34 0.00 1,101.34 AP 00408750 03/25/2020 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 255.90 0.00 255.90 AP 00408751 03/25/2020 TYUS, IDA 411.00 0.00 411.00 AP 00408752 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 15,333.18 0.00 15,333.18 AP 00408753 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,100.20 0.00 1,100.20 AP 00408754 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00408755 03/25/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 301.45 0.00 301.45 AP 00408756 03/25/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00408757 03/25/2020 UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 1,347.50 0.00 1,347.50 AP 00408758 03/25/2020 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00408759 03/25/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00408760 03/25/2020 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 5.83 5.83 AP 00408765 03/25/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,694.65 0.00 5,694.65 AP 00408766 03/25/2020 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 4,818.47 0.00 4,818.47 AP 00408767 03/25/2020 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 AP 00408768 03/25/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 3,779.28 0.00 3,779.28 AP 00408769 03/25/2020 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 452.04 0.00 452.04 AP 00408770 03/25/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7,537.77 1,928.61 9,466.38 *** AP 00408771 03/25/2020 WELLS, JUDITH 80.60 0.00 80.60 AP 00408772 03/25/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 2,550.00 0.00 2,550.00 AP 00408773 03/25/2020 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF VET MEDICINE 370.00 0.00 370.00 AP 00408774 03/25/2020 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 1,024.89 0.00 1,024.89 AP 00408775 03/25/2020 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 5,700.00 0.00 5,700.00 AP 00408776 03/25/2020 WILLIAMS, OMAR 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00408777 03/25/2020 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 4,836.81 0.00 4,836.81 AP 00408778 03/25/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,201.04 0.00 1,201.04 AP 00408779 03/25/2020 YANG, FANG 61.05 0.00 61.05 AP 00408780 03/25/2020 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 679.20 0.00 679.20 AP 00408781 03/25/2020 ZOETIS US LLC 776.12 0.00 776.12 AP 00408782 03/26/2020 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00408783 03/26/2020 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 1,400.12 1,400.12 AP 00408784 03/26/2020 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00408785 03/26/2020 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00408786 04/01/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,562.30 0.00 5,562.30 AP 00408787 04/01/2020 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC 2,284.72 0.00 2,284.72 AP 00408788 04/01/2020 ACTION AWARDS INC 41.58 0.00 41.58 AP 00408789 04/01/2020 ALCORN, RICHARD 86.19 0.00 86.19 AP 00408790 04/01/2020 ALL WELDING 1,090.00 0.00 1,090.00 AP 00408791 04/01/2020 ALTUM GROUP, THE 885.50 0.00 885.50 AP 00408792 04/01/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 504.90 0.00 504.90 AP 00408793 04/01/2020 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408794 04/01/2020 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 215.45 0.00 215.45 AP 00408795 04/01/2020 ASSI SECURITY 970.00 1,335.00 2,305.00 *** AP 00408796 04/01/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 64.68 0.00 64.68 AP 00408797 04/01/2020 AYALA, CLAUDIA 83.77 0.00 83.77 AP 00408798 04/01/2020 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALIST 64.65 0.00 64.65 AP 00408799 04/01/2020 BEE REMOVERS 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00408800 04/01/2020 BERN MARIE'S PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,042.15 0.00 1,042.15 AP 00408801 04/01/2020 BILL & WAGS INC 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00408802 04/01/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 497.99 0.00 497.99 AP 00408803 04/01/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 6,696.94 6,696.94 AP 00408804 04/01/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 151.79 0.00 151.79 AP 00408805 04/01/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 88,775.56 0.00 88,775.56 AP 00408806 04/01/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 2,485.96 0.00 2,485.96 AP 00408807 04/01/2020 C V W D 400.78 0.00 400.78 AP 00408813 04/01/2020 C V W D 48,810.31 342.41 49,152.72 *** AP 00408814 04/01/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00408815 04/01/2020 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION 6,144.52 0.00 6,144.52 AP 00408816 04/01/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 64,263.08 0.00 64,263.08 AP 00408817 04/01/2020 CERVANTES, MIGUEL 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00408818 04/01/2020 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 2,880.00 0.00 2,880.00 AP 00408819 04/01/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 21.68 0.00 21.68 AP 00408820 04/01/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 200.75 200.75 AP 00408821 04/01/2020 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 520.00 0.00 520.00 AP 00408822 04/01/2020 CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC 2,945.50 0.00 2,945.50 AP 00408823 04/01/2020 CUNNINGHAM, PATRICIA 82.16 0.00 82.16 AP 00408824 04/01/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,178.11 0.00 2,178.11 AP 00408825 04/01/2020 DABNEY, KELSEY 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00408826 04/01/2020 DAVID S MASON INC 5,045.15 0.00 5,045.15 AP 00408827 04/01/2020 DENAULT, AMANDA 93.04 0.00 93.04 AP 00408828 04/01/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,198.00 0.00 2,198.00 AP 00408829 04/01/2020 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 47.50 0.00 47.50 AP 00408830 04/01/2020 DIG SAFE BOARD 101.69 0.00 101.69 AP 00408831 04/01/2020 DIVERSIFIED UTILITY SERVICES INC 1,318.00 0.00 1,318.00 AP 00408832 04/01/2020 DM CONTRACTING INC 31,370.88 0.00 31,370.88 AP 00408833 04/01/2020 DOG WASTE DEPOT 2,064.53 0.00 2,064.53 AP 00408834 04/01/2020 DP SOLUTIONS INC 8,370.00 8,370.00 16,740.00 *** AP 00408835 04/01/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,420.00 0.00 3,420.00 AP 00408836 04/01/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 683.57 0.00 683.57 AP 00408837 04/01/2020 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00408838 04/01/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 284.43 0.00 284.43 AP 00408839 04/01/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 520.19 520.19 AP 00408840 04/01/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD 198.00 0.00 198.00 AP 00408841 04/01/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 128.85 0.00 128.85 AP 00408842 04/01/2020 FEHR AND PEERS 20,545.00 0.00 20,545.00 AP 00408843 04/01/2020 FIRST AID 2000 3,341.07 0.00 3,341.07 AP 00408844 04/01/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 5,565.04 0.00 5,565.04 AP 00408845 04/01/2020 FORTIN LAW GROUP 9,369.55 0.00 9,369.55 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408846 04/01/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 205.37 205.37 AP 00408847 04/01/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,403.16 0.00 3,403.16 AP 00408848 04/01/2020 FUEL SERV 1,641.01 0.00 1,641.01 AP 00408849 04/01/2020 GALANTI, WENDY 152.88 0.00 152.88 AP 00408850 04/01/2020 GATHRIGHT, ELAINE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408851 04/01/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 738.60 0.00 738.60 AP 00408852 04/01/2020 GLOBALSTAR USA 172.59 0.00 172.59 AP 00408853 04/01/2020 GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH 178.88 0.00 178.88 AP 00408854 04/01/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 186,552.00 2,228.00 188,780.00 *** AP 00408855 04/01/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00408856 04/01/2020 GRAINGER 1,020.35 150.69 1,171.04 *** AP 00408857 04/01/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 140.08 0.00 140.08 AP 00408858 04/01/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 3,398.05 0.00 3,398.05 AP 00408859 04/01/2020 GUARDADO, FAVIAN 152.88 0.00 152.88 AP 00408860 04/01/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 568.57 0.00 568.57 AP 00408861 04/01/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00408862 04/01/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 464.73 0.00 464.73 AP 00408863 04/01/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 0.00 120.20 120.20 AP 00408864 04/01/2020 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 151.59 0.00 151.59 AP 00408865 04/01/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 5,233.62 0.00 5,233.62 AP 00408866 04/01/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00408867 04/01/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 289.00 0.00 289.00 AP 00408868 04/01/2020 INTERNATIONAL COATINGS COMPANY INC 671.01 0.00 671.01 AP 00408869 04/01/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 374.95 0.00 374.95 AP 00408870 04/01/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 302.43 787.28 1,089.71 *** AP 00408871 04/01/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,010.34 0.00 1,010.34 AP 00408872 04/01/2020 ITERIS INC 14,046.14 0.00 14,046.14 AP 00408873 04/01/2020 JOHNSON, MARK 76.63 0.00 76.63 AP 00408874 04/01/2020 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 3,560.56 0.00 3,560.56 AP 00408875 04/01/2020 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 5,254.00 468.00 5,722.00 *** AP 00408876 04/01/2020 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK INC 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00408877 04/01/2020 LIANG, EDDIE QIWEI 134.41 0.00 134.41 AP 00408878 04/01/2020 LOPEZ, PEDRO 3,796.00 0.00 3,796.00 AP 00408879 04/01/2020 LOUIE'S NURSERY 206.85 0.00 206.85 AP 00408880 04/01/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 205.50 0.00 205.50 AP 00408881 04/01/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,677.67 0.00 1,677.67 AP 00408882 04/01/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 110,094.84 4,072.00 114,166.84 *** AP 00408883 04/01/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00408884 04/01/2020 MEDIA CONTROL SYSTEMS 61,153.42 0.00 61,153.42 AP 00408885 04/01/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 1,423.13 0.00 1,423.13 AP 00408886 04/01/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 579.00 0.00 579.00 AP 00408887 04/01/2020 MISSION PATIO COVER ETC 336.53 0.00 336.53 AP 00408888 04/01/2020 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 30.17 0.00 30.17 AP 00408889 04/01/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 284.32 0.00 284.32 AP 00408890 04/01/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.52 581.76 601.28 *** AP 00408891 04/01/2020 OGG, KRISTIN 45.34 0.00 45.34 AP 00408892 04/01/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2,521.29 0.00 2,521.29 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 26 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408893 04/01/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,323.62 234.41 1,558.03 *** AP 00408894 04/01/2020 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 412.06 0.00 412.06 AP 00408895 04/01/2020 PELOTON INTERACTIVE INC 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00408896 04/01/2020 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 84.62 0.00 84.62 AP 00408897 04/01/2020 PIP PRINTING 326.32 0.00 326.32 AP 00408898 04/01/2020 PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC 2,432.45 1,757.17 4,189.62 *** AP 00408899 04/01/2020 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 2,426.55 0.00 2,426.55 AP 00408900 04/01/2020 PUNT CONSULTING GROUP 2,490.00 0.00 2,490.00 AP 00408901 04/01/2020 QUADIENT INC 540.46 0.00 540.46 AP 00408902 04/01/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 746.97 0.00 746.97 AP 00408903 04/01/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TOWN SQUARE 10,089.49 0.00 10,089.49 AP 00408904 04/01/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 36.10 0.00 36.10 AP 00408905 04/01/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 101.62 0.00 101.62 AP 00408906 04/01/2020 RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL INC 693.62 0.00 693.62 AP 00408907 04/01/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00408908 04/01/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00408909 04/01/2020 RODIA, DEAN 93.00 0.00 93.00 AP 00408910 04/01/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 12,800.00 0.00 12,800.00 AP 00408911 04/01/2020 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 1,140.00 1,140.00 AP 00408912 04/01/2020 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 522.59 0.00 522.59 AP 00408913 04/01/2020 SAN MARINO ROOF CO INC 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 AP 00408914 04/01/2020 SC FUELS 3,232.33 0.00 3,232.33 AP 00408915 04/01/2020 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 212.80 212.80 AP 00408916 04/01/2020 SHRED PROS 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00408917 04/01/2020 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 129.30 129.30 AP 00408918 04/01/2020 SMITH, THERESE 29.92 0.00 29.92 AP 00408920 04/01/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00408927 04/01/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,673.09 1,571.08 11,244.17 *** AP 00408928 04/01/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,938.33 0.00 1,938.33 AP 00408929 04/01/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 179.75 0.00 179.75 AP 00408930 04/01/2020 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 140.08 0.00 140.08 AP 00408931 04/01/2020 SUPERION LLC 5,580.00 0.00 5,580.00 AP 00408932 04/01/2020 TAVERA, BRIANNA 52.94 0.00 52.94 AP 00408933 04/01/2020 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION 134.41 0.00 134.41 AP 00408934 04/01/2020 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408935 04/01/2020 TIREHUB LLC 2,891.98 0.00 2,891.98 AP 00408936 04/01/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 98,100.00 0.00 98,100.00 AP 00408937 04/01/2020 TRAFFICWARE GROUP INC 4,109.83 0.00 4,109.83 AP 00408938 04/01/2020 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 113.95 0.00 113.95 AP 00408939 04/01/2020 UPS 123.21 0.00 123.21 AP 00408940 04/01/2020 UTILIQUEST 880.20 0.00 880.20 AP 00408941 04/01/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,110.86 5,110.86 AP 00408942 04/01/2020 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,176.52 0.00 11,176.52 AP 00408943 04/01/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 6,580.69 0.00 6,580.69 AP 00408944 04/01/2020 WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIROSERV 3,081.34 0.00 3,081.34 AP 00408945 04/01/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 18,326.41 0.00 18,326.41 AP 00408946 04/01/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 46,576.00 0.00 46,576.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 27 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408947 04/01/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10,821.65 0.00 10,821.65 AP 00408948 04/01/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,479.98 0.00 9,479.98 AP 00408949 04/01/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 412.34 0.00 412.34 AP 00408950 04/01/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00408951 04/01/2020 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 725.00 0.00 725.00 AP 00408952 04/01/2020 WT.COX INFORMATION SERVICES 6,113.13 0.00 6,113.13 Total City: $2,686,090.53 Total Fire: $233,023.33 Grand Total: Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 28 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS FOR CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,128.07 DATED MARCH 23, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 05, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Fire Board approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 So Ca Gas - Check Register Page 29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00408733 03/25/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18.13 763.59 781.72 *** AP 00408919 04/01/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14,822.48 364.48 15,186.96 *** Total City: $14,840.61 Total Fire: $1,128.07 Grand Total:$15,968—.68 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:52:28 Page 30 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II Michelle Cowles, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT AND STANDARD OFFER, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTION BETWEEN BIRTCHER DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF TWO (2) PARCELS OF VACANT LAND AND APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $817,470. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve an Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Agreement) and Standard Offer, Agreement and Escrow Instruction (the Agreement) between Birtcher Development, LLC (Assignor) and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Assignee) for the acquisition of approximately 40,837 SF of unimproved land located at 9763 8th Street in Rancho Cucamonga also known as San Bernardino County Assessor's Parcel Numbers 0209-192-21 and 0209-192-22. Additionally, Staff requests approval for an appropriation in the amount of $817,470 for acquisition, related due diligence, and closing cost; and authorizes the City Manager, Fire Chief, or Fire District Counsel to make administrative modifications that are deemed necessary to complete the transaction. I�1 44XC T91"J L I I A serious fire or life-threatening emergency can and does occur at any place, any time throughout the community. While statistics may indicate more frequent demands in certain parts of the community, it is the goal that all areas of the community have resources that maintain good response times and provide back-up when the first -due units are committed to another incident. These resources, along with skilled staffing, can most likely stop the escalation of the emergency for any specified risk type. Under the leadership of the Fire Board and City Manager, the Fire District conducted analysis utilizing state of the art heat maps that provide a quantitative method to determine fire station needs and locations. Through this analysis, we have been able to show that a need for a future fire station serving the southern section of the City will be needed in the future. With the assistance of the City Manager's Office, the Fire District was able to locate a vacant piece of land in the heart of the area, potentially needing future service. ANALYSIS: The Assignor has executed a Standard Offer, Agreement and Escrow Instructions for the purchase of the vacant land located at 9763 8th Street in Rancho Cucamonga. The Agreement allows the Assignor Page 31 to assign the Standard Offer at the Assignor's sole direction. The Fire District intends to purchase this property for public use, building a future Fire Station (179) at this location. Considerable strategic analysis has gone into the selection of this piece of land, which is the most viable location for the future station. Staff will execute the Agreement, with approval from the Fire Board, assume the Assignor's escrow, and begin the due diligence phase. It is estimated that escrow would close on or before June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount $25,000 have been budgeted in Fire Protection Capital Fund/ Capital Outlay Land, Account Number 3288501-5600, and an appropriation of $817,470 is requested to be funded from Fire Protection Capital Fund/ Capital Outlay Land, Account Number 3288501-5600. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This purchase supports the City Council's goal to promote public safety by proactively developing public safety programs and facilities to meet community needs and continue to provide life -safety emergency services to our residents, visitors, and businesses. ATTACHMENTS: Description ATTACHMENT 1 - LOCATION MAP ATTACHMENT 2 - ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF "STANDARD OFFER, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE (VACANT LAND)" Page 32 r�r�r r�rrrr r � RANCHO CUCAMONGA Pli } Attachment 1— Location Map: 9763 8t" Street Stn Street Subject PropertVI �Ir r, P*:,l0lw,- k: 7 E Al O ca .. F Acacia St. J ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF "STANDARD OFFER, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE (VACANT LANDY' This ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF STANDARD OFFER, AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR PURCHASE OF REAL ESTATE (VACANT LAND) ("Assignment") is dated as of March 31, 2020 and is entered into by and between BIRTCHER DEVELOPMENT LLC, a California limited liability company ("Assignor") and the RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, a public entity ("Assignee"). RF,C''ITALS A. Assignor is the buyer under that certain "Standard Offer, Agreement and Escrow Instructions for Purchase of Real Estate (Vacant Land)" dated in March, 2020 with JCJ General Merchandise, Inc., a California corporation, as seller ("Seller") (with Addendum, the "PSA"). B. The PSA permits Assignor to assign the PSA in Assignor's sole and absolute discretion. C. Assignor has delivered a deposit of $35,000 ("Deposit") under the PSA to the Seller. D. Assignor desires to assign the PSA and Deposit to Assignee, and Assignee desires to assume the PSA and reimburse Assignor for the Deposit. E. Assignee also desires to pay the Assignor $22,542.90 (which is 3% of the purchase price in the PSA) as assignment consideratin. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are mutually acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee now agree as follows: 1. Effective as of the date of this Assignment, Assignor assigns to Assignee, all of Assignor's right, title and interest hereunder and to the PSA and Deposit. 2. Assignee accepts the foregoing assignment, and assumes and agrees to be bound by and perform all of Assignor's obligations under the PSA arising from and after the date of this Assignment. 3. On or before the date that is five (5) business days after the date of this Assignment, Assignee shall pay $57,542.90 (representing $35,000 for the Deposit and $22,542.90 as assignment consideration) to Assignor by wire transfer to: d� 11231-0001\2398685v2. d oc Page 34 Bank Name: Bank Address: Beneficiary Account: Beneficiary Account Name: Reference: Beneficiary Address: ABA: SWIFT: Wells Fargo Bank 5000 Birch St. 10th Floor Newport Beach, CA 92660 9282154609 Birtcher Development LLC Fire District 450 Newport Center Dr. #220 Newport Beach, CA 92660 121000248 WFBIUS6S 4. Assignor and Assignee shall deliver a copy of this executed Assignment of Purchase Agreement to Seller and Assignee, and Assignor and Assignee hereby inform Seller that Assignee's address(es) for notices under the PSA shall be: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attn: Executive Director with copies by email to: Mike.McCliman@cityofrc.us and Flavio.Nunez@cityofrc.us 5. Assignee represents to Assignor that Assignee has not amended or previously assigned the PSA. 6. Assignee shall defend, indemnify and hold Assignor harmless from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, losses, costs and expenses arising from Assignee's acts or omissions under the PSA arising after the date of this Assignment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Assignor and Assignee have duly executed and delivered this Assignment as of the date first above written. 1123 1 -000 1\2398685v2.doe Page 35 "ASSIGNOR": BIRTCHER DEVELOPMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company 11231-0001\2398685v2.doc "ASSIGNEE": RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT IN John Gillison, Executive Director Page 36 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE BI -WEEKLY PAYROLL IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,424,791.16 AND WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS (EXCLUDING CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY) IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,686,090.53 DATED MARCH 23, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 05, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 Check Register Page 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010365 03/25/2020 A'JONTUE, ROSE ANN 979.20 0.00 979.20 AP 00010366 03/25/2020 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 20,374.75 0.00 20,374.75 AP 00010367 03/25/2020 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 22,555.12 0.00 22,555.12 AP 00010368 03/25/2020 BALANCE 4 LIFE FITNESS 4 WELLNESS INC 368.00 0.00 368.00 AP 00010369 03/25/2020 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,172.14 0.00 23,172.14 AP 00010370 03/25/2020 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 18,203.90 0.00 18,203.90 AP 00010371 03/25/2020 HAMPTON YOGA 840.00 0.00 840.00 AP 00010372 03/25/2020 INDERWEISCHE, MATT 666.00 0.00 666.00 AP 00010373 03/25/2020 MOFFATT & NICHOL 165,456.28 0.00 165,456.28 AP 00010374 03/25/2020 ORONA, PATRICIA 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00010375 03/25/2020 RCCEA 1,908.00 0.00 1,908.00 AP 00010376 03/25/2020 RCPFA 12,449.28 0.00 12,449.28 AP 00010377 03/25/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 159.81 0.00 159.81 AP 00010378 03/25/2020 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 260,016.09 0.00 260,016.09 AP 00010379 03/25/2020 TICKETS.COM 45,295.84 0.00 45,295.84 AP 00010380 03/26/2020 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010381 03/26/2020 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010382 03/26/2020 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010383 03/26/2020 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010384 03/26/2020 BELL, MICHAEL L. 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010385 03/26/2020 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010386 03/26/2020 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010387 03/26/2020 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010388 03/26/2020 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,189.23 1,189.23 AP 00010389 03/26/2020 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010390 03/26/2020 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010391 03/26/2020 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010392 03/26/2020 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010393 03/26/2020 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010394 03/26/2020 COX, KARL 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010395 03/26/2020 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010396 03/26/2020 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010397 03/26/2020 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010398 03/26/2020 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010399 03/26/2020 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010400 03/26/2020 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010401 03/26/2020 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A. 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010402 03/26/2020 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010403 03/26/2020 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010404 03/26/2020 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010405 03/26/2020 FRITCHEY, JOHN D. 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010406 03/26/2020 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010407 03/26/2020 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00010408 03/26/2020 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010409 03/26/2020 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010410 03/26/2020 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010411 03/26/2020 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 38 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00010412 03/26/2020 LEE, ALLAN J. 0.00 948.67 948.67 AP 00010413 03/26/2020 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,487.34 1,487.34 AP 00010414 03/26/2020 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010415 03/26/2020 LONGO, JOE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010416 03/26/2020 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010417 03/26/2020 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010418 03/26/2020 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010419 03/26/2020 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010420 03/26/2020 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010421 03/26/2020 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010422 03/26/2020 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,792.73 1,792.73 AP 00010423 03/26/2020 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,189.78 1,189.78 AP 00010424 03/26/2020 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010425 03/26/2020 NEE, RON 0.00 743.03 743.03 AP 00010426 03/26/2020 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 200.43 200.43 AP 00010427 03/26/2020 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,281.58 1,281.58 AP 00010428 03/26/2020 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 563.78 563.78 AP 00010429 03/26/2020 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,280.32 1,280.32 AP 00010430 03/26/2020 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010431 03/26/2020 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010432 03/26/2020 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 792.12 792.12 AP 00010433 03/26/2020 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00010434 03/26/2020 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010435 03/26/2020 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010436 03/26/2020 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010437 03/26/2020 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 2,154.28 2,154.28 AP 00010438 03/26/2020 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010439 03/26/2020 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 864.82 864.82 AP 00010440 03/26/2020 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 539.86 539.86 AP 00010441 03/26/2020 TAYLOR, STEVE 0.00 1,975.24 1,975.24 AP 00010442 03/26/2020 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,723.24 1,723.24 AP 00010443 03/26/2020 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 630.56 630.56 AP 00010444 03/26/2020 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,176.90 1,176.90 AP 00010445 03/26/2020 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,588.41 1,588.41 AP 00010446 03/26/2020 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 1,127.81 1,127.81 AP 00010447 03/26/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 628.93 0.00 628.93 AP 00010448 03/26/2020 AIR EXCHANGE INC 0.00 386.75 386.75 AP 00010449 03/26/2020 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 377.71 377.71 AP 00010450 03/26/2020 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,502.69 0.00 3,502.69 AP 00010451 03/26/2020 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 410.51 0.00 410.51 AP 00010452 03/26/2020 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 554.28 0.00 554.28 AP 00010453 03/26/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 262.90 0.00 262.90 AP 00010454 03/26/2020 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 336.18 0.00 336.18 AP 00010455 03/26/2020 GENERATOR SERVICES CO 1,115.12 0.00 1,115.12 AP 00010456 03/26/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,249.77 0.00 3,249.77 AP 00010457 03/26/2020 HOSE MAN INC 62.97 130.87 193.84 *** AP 00010458 03/26/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 2,408.43 2,408.43 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 2 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 39 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Cu Fire Amount AP 00010459 03/26/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 431.21 510.71 941.92 *** AP 00010460 03/26/2020 PSA PRINT GROUP 49.57 0.00 49.57 AP 00010461 03/26/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 14,329.56 0.00 14,329.56 AP 00010462 03/26/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 158.05 0.00 158.05 AP 00010463 03/26/2020 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,099.40 0.00 1,099.40 AP 00010464 03/26/2020 SUNRISE FORD 74.86 0.00 74.86 AP 00010465 03/26/2020 TARGET SPECIALTY PRODUCTS 471.31 0.00 471.31 AP 00010466 03/26/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 3,376.05 0.00 3,376.05 AP 00010467 04/01/2020 ACTIVE NETWORK LLC 47,314.65 0.00 47,314.65 AP 00010468 04/01/2020 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HS DISTRICT 2,042.88 0.00 2,042.88 AP 00010469 04/01/2020 RODRIGUEZ, EUGENIO 4,188.44 0.00 4,188.44 AP 00010470 04/01/2020 TICKETS.COM 21,044.42 0.00 21,044.42 AP 00010471 04/02/2020 ABC LOCKSMITHS 214.97 0.00 214.97 AP 00010472 04/02/2020 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 67.50 0.00 67.50 AP 00010473 04/02/2020 BSN SPORTS LLC 3,188.78 0.00 3,188.78 AP 00010474 04/02/2020 CRAFCOINC 4,491.59 0.00 4,491.59 AP 00010475 04/02/2020 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,156.46 0.00 1,156.46 AP 00010476 04/02/2020 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 648.66 0.00 648.66 AP 00010477 04/02/2020 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 8,139.87 8,139.87 AP 00010478 04/02/2020 LN CURTIS AND SONS 0.00 545.64 545.64 AP 00010479 04/02/2020 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 290.93 0.00 290.93 AP 00010480 04/02/2020 MINUTEMAN PRESS 183.18 0.00 183.18 AP 00010482 04/02/2020 OFFICE DEPOT 5,245.26 0.00 5,245.26 AP 00010484 04/02/2020 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 354,202.97 0.00 354,202.97 AP 00010485 04/02/2020 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 769.98 0.00 769.98 AP 00010486 04/02/2020 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 1,057.57 0.00 1,057.57 AP 00408572 03/25/2020 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC 97.18 0.00 97.18 AP 00408573 03/25/2020 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 0.00 1,520.79 1,520.79 AP 00408574 03/25/2020 ADOBE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00408575 03/25/2020 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00408576 03/25/2020 ALLIED NETWORK SOLUTIONS LOCKBOX 33,056.00 3,104.00 36,160.00 *** AP 00408577 03/25/2020 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 1,244.62 1,244.62 AP 00408578 03/25/2020 ALLSTATE PAYMENT PROCESSING CENTER 0.00 803.91 803.91 AP 00408579 03/25/2020 ALPHAGRAPHICS 392.21 0.00 392.21 AP 00408580 03/25/2020 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00408581 03/25/2020 AROCHO, ALMA 1,447.80 0.00 1,447.80 AP 00408582 03/25/2020 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC 233.60 0.00 233.60 AP 00408583 03/25/2020 ASSI SECURITY 1,355.00 0.00 1,355.00 AP 00408584 03/25/2020 AUFBAU CORPORATION 36,339.00 0.00 36,339.00 AP 00408585 03/25/2020 AUNTIE M CREATIVE CONSULTANTS INC 732.50 0.00 732.50 AP 00408586 03/25/2020 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 571.47 0.00 571.47 AP 00408587 03/25/2020 BAST, KAROLYN 236.68 0.00 236.68 AP 00408588 03/25/2020 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC 39.87 0.00 39.87 AP 00408589 03/25/2020 BERNELL HYDRAULICS INC 0.00 51.38 51.38 AP 00408590 03/25/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 900.85 0.00 900.85 AP 00408591 03/25/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 1,131.75 1,131.75 AP 00408592 03/25/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 40,099.72 0.00 40,099.72 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 3 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire AP 00408593 03/25/2020 BROWN, JENNIFER 39.86 0.00 AP 00408594 03/25/2020 C V W D 106.25 0.00 AP 00408600 03/25/2020 C V W D 69,721.77 978.24 AP 00408601 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 100.00 0.00 AP 00408602 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 AP 00408603 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 8.44 0.00 AP 00408604 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 AP 00408605 03/25/2020 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 30.00 0.00 AP 00408606 03/25/2020 CALIN, ANGELA 866.00 0.00 AP 00408607 03/25/2020 CART RETRIEVAL INC 285.00 0.00 AP 00408608 03/25/2020 CARTY, DIANE 396.00 0.00 AP 00408609 03/25/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,027.48 360.42 AP 00408610 03/25/2020 CLARK, KAREN 990.00 0.00 AP 00408611 03/25/2020 COCKRELL, JEANNE 22.00 0.00 AP 00408612 03/25/2020 COMBINED MARTIAL SCIENCE INC 4,124.40 0.00 AP 00408613 03/25/2020 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTR INC 2,820.90 0.00 AP 00408614 03/25/2020 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 181.83 0.00 AP 00408615 03/25/2020 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING 1,724.10 0.00 AP 00408616 03/25/2020 CROWE, DEBBIE 250.00 0.00 AP 00408617 03/25/2020 CURRAN, LISA 250.00 0.00 AP 00408618 03/25/2020 D & D SERVICES INC. 451.50 0.00 AP 00408619 03/25/2020 DANCE TERRIFIC 3,950.10 0.00 AP 00408620 03/25/2020 DATA TICKET INC 6,303.43 0.00 AP 00408621 03/25/2020 DOBOS, JAMES L. 18.00 0.00 AP 00408622 03/25/2020 DOLLARHIDE, GINGER 154.35 0.00 AP 00408623 03/25/2020 DUNN, ANNE MARIE 849.60 0.00 AP 00408624 03/25/2020 EASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 650.40 0.00 AP 00408625 03/25/2020 EASTERLING, RAY 228.00 0.00 AP 00408626 03/25/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,403.75 0.00 AP 00408627 03/25/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 155.16 0.00 AP 00408628 03/25/2020 ELITE CUSTOMS CONSTRUCTION 1,800.00 0.00 AP 00408629 03/25/2020 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 0.00 373.00 AP 00408630 03/25/2020 ESPARZA, BLANCA 1,157.19 0.00 AP 00408631 03/25/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 67.72 0.00 AP 00408632 03/25/2020 FELICIANO, ANTHONY 162.00 0.00 AP 00408633 03/25/2020 FIRSTCARBON SOLUTIONS 5,077.05 0.00 AP 00408634 03/25/2020 FLAG SYSTEMS INC 1,200.00 0.00 AP 00408635 03/25/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 981.29 0.00 AP 00408636 03/25/2020 FORTIN LAW GROUP 348.90 0.00 AP 00408637 03/25/2020 FOSTER, TERESA 100.00 0.00 AP 00408638 03/25/2020 FRONTIER COMM 623.82 460.40 AP 00408639 03/25/2020 GASTON, ROBERT 250.00 0.00 AP 00408640 03/25/2020 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY AND CREMATORY 270.00 0.00 AP 00408641 03/25/2020 GILKEY, JOHN A 610.00 0.00 AP 00408642 03/25/2020 GILLISON, JOHN 29.36 0.00 AP 00408643 03/25/2020 GIORDANO, MARIANNA 54.24 0.00 AP 00408644 03/25/2020 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 Amount 39.86 106.25 70,700.01 100.00 314.11 8.44 342.73 30.00 866.00 285.00 396.00 1,387.90 990.00 22.00 4,124.40 2,820.90 181.83 1,724.10 250.00 250.00 451.50 3,950.10 6,303.43 18.00 154.35 849.60 650.40 228.00 3,403.75 155.16 1,800.00 373.00 *** *** 1,157.19 67.72 162.00 5,077.05 1,200.00 981.29 348.90 100.00 1,084.22 *** 250.00 270.00 610.00 29.36 54.24 50.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 4 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408645 03/25/2020 GONZALEZ, CATHY 52.50 0.00 52.50 AP 00408646 03/25/2020 GONZALEZ, JOSE CRUZ 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 AP 00408647 03/25/2020 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00408648 03/25/2020 GRAINGER 104.81 0.00 104.81 AP 00408649 03/25/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 1,034.40 0.00 1,034.40 AP 00408650 03/25/2020 GRAYDON, RONALD 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00408651 03/25/2020 GUGOL, FE 38.00 0.00 38.00 AP 00408652 03/25/2020 GUTIERREZ, DIANNE 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00408653 03/25/2020 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 1,680.00 0.00 1,680.00 AP 00408654 03/25/2020 HANDTEVY PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY STANDARDS 0.00 3,819.37 3,819.37 AP 00408655 03/25/2020 HANGTIME SPORTS 528.00 0.00 528.00 AP 00408656 03/25/2020 HO, HOWARD 833.00 0.00 833.00 AP 00408657 03/25/2020 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 298.35 0.00 298.35 AP 00408658 03/25/2020 HOMECOMING V AT TERRA VISTA LLC 37.98 0.00 37.98 AP 00408659 03/25/2020 HUBBERT, JAMES LIDELL 39.00 0.00 39.00 AP 00408660 03/25/2020 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 125.00 0.00 125.00 AP 00408661 03/25/2020 INLAND VALLEY DANCE ACADEMY 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00408662 03/25/2020 INLAND VALLEY EMERGENCY PET CLINIC 323.00 0.00 323.00 AP 00408663 03/25/2020 INTELESYS 4,828.69 0.00 4,828.69 AP 00408664 03/25/2020 INTERNATIONAL LINE BUILDERS INC 4,088.00 0.00 4,088.00 AP 00408665 03/25/2020 IZQUIERDO, NELLY 286.40 0.00 286.40 AP 00408666 03/25/2020 JERROLD, JESSICA 107.00 0.00 107.00 AP 00408667 03/25/2020 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 2,252.40 0.00 2,252.40 AP 00408668 03/25/2020 KARASEK, CHRISTINE 1,219.00 0.00 1,219.00 AP 00408669 03/25/2020 KEITH, JORRY 486.00 0.00 486.00 AP 00408670 03/25/2020 KINETIC LIGHTING INC 44.00 0.00 44.00 AP 00408671 03/25/2020 LANE, TRAVIS 0.00 270.00 270.00 AP 00408672 03/25/2020 LEE, KYOUNG HEE 86.06 0.00 86.06 AP 00408673 03/25/2020 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 23,707.15 23,707.15 AP 00408674 03/25/2020 LIFE ASSIST INC 0.00 132.75 132.75 AP 00408675 03/25/2020 LOPEZ, PEDRO 3,796.00 0.00 3,796.00 AP 00408676 03/25/2020 LYNBERG & WATKINS 0.00 250.00 250.00 AP 00408677 03/25/2020 MARGARET LAMB & ATTORNEYS OF RECORD 76,000.00 0.00 76,000.00 AP 00408678 03/25/2020 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 1,900.80 0.00 1,900.80 AP 00408679 03/25/2020 MATANGA, JULIE EDWARDS 561.00 0.00 561.00 AP 00408680 03/25/2020 MAXWELL, ANTHONY 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00408681 03/25/2020 MAZOR, MARYA 1,133.00 0.00 1,133.00 AP 00408682 03/25/2020 MCCAUSLAND, AMANDA 302.64 0.00 302.64 AP 00408683 03/25/2020 MCGARRY, DARCY 25.12 0.00 25.12 AP 00408684 03/25/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00408685 03/25/2020 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 0.00 279.63 279.63 AP 00408686 03/25/2020 MEDRANO, CELESTE 26.93 0.00 26.93 AP 00408687 03/25/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 212.50 0.00 212.50 AP 00408688 03/25/2020 MOE, JOHN 199.50 0.00 199.50 AP 00408689 03/25/2020 MORRIS, RICHARD 90.00 0.00 90.00 AP 00408690 03/25/2020 MOUSSA, JANET 285.00 0.00 285.00 AP 00408691 03/25/2020 MURASKA, DORINA 16.00 0.00 16.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 5 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 42 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408692 03/25/2020 NICHOLAS E ROSE MEDICAL CONSULTING INC 3,612.50 0.00 3,612.50 AP 00408693 03/25/2020 NORTHTOWN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORP 751.52 0.00 751.52 AP 00408694 03/25/2020 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 6,147.50 37,088.50 43,236.00 *** AP 00408696 03/25/2020 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 2,475.00 0.00 2,475.00 AP 00408697 03/25/2020 ONWARD ENGINEERING 29,640.00 0.00 29,640.00 AP 00408698 03/25/2020 OTT, LAURA 882.00 0.00 882.00 AP 00408699 03/25/2020 OTT, SHARON 259.20 0.00 259.20 AP 00408700 03/25/2020 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 869.40 0.00 869.40 AP 00408701 03/25/2020 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00408702 03/25/2020 PARSONS, KARYN 346.50 0.00 346.50 AP 00408703 03/25/2020 PLACEWORKS 3,793.86 0.00 3,793.86 AP 00408704 03/25/2020 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00408705 03/25/2020 PORTERFIELD, JULIE 125.84 0.00 125.84 AP 00408706 03/25/2020 POSTAL PERFECT 315.00 0.00 315.00 AP 00408707 03/25/2020 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00408708 03/25/2020 PRECISION GYMNASTICS 1,309.00 0.00 1,309.00 AP 00408709 03/25/2020 QUINTANA, CHRISTINE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408710 03/25/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 2,229.37 0.00 2,229.37 AP 00408711 03/25/2020 RADIUS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS 558.44 0.00 558.44 AP 00408712 03/25/2020 RAMAKER, DANIELLE 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00408713 03/25/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00408714 03/25/2020 RECREATION RESULTS 4,780.00 0.00 4,780.00 AP 00408715 03/25/2020 RENTERIA, HOLLY 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408716 03/25/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 3,200.00 0.00 3,200.00 AP 00408717 03/25/2020 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 51,824.50 0.00 51,824.50 AP 00408718 03/25/2020 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC 256.87 0.00 256.87 AP 00408719 03/25/2020 ROMO PLANNING GROUP INC 360.00 0.00 360.00 AP 00408720 03/25/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00408721 03/25/2020 SABIO, KINI 456.00 0.00 456.00 AP 00408722 03/25/2020 SAGE OAK SCHOOL 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00408723 03/25/2020 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 13,364.71 13,364.71 AP 00408724 03/25/2020 SASSOON, LORI 202.30 0.00 202.30 AP 00408725 03/25/2020 SBPEA 2,576.96 0.00 2,576.96 AP 00408726 03/25/2020 SC FUELS 0.00 15,516.15 15,516.15 AP 00408727 03/25/2020 SCHWARTZ, STEPHANIE KURLEY 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00408728 03/25/2020 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00408729 03/25/2020 SHRED PROS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00408730 03/25/2020 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 25,677.96 0.00 25,677.96 AP 00408731 03/25/2020 SMIDERLE, FRANK 41.68 0.00 41.68 AP 00408732 03/25/2020 SMITH, JAYMI LEE 866.00 0.00 866.00 AP 00408734 03/25/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00408735 03/25/2020 SONG, CHUANHONG 69.86 0.00 69.86 AP 00408736 03/25/2020 SORIANO, HELEN 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00408737 03/25/2020 SOUPCOFF, THOMAS 78.00 0.00 78.00 AP 00408740 03/25/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,770.08 0.00 9,770.08 AP 00408741 03/25/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,360.41 0.00 1,360.41 AP 00408742 03/25/2020 STEPPIN OUT BALLROOM 525.00 0.00 525.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 6 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 43 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408743 03/25/2020 STEPPING THRU ACCESSIBILITY 4,965.00 0.00 4,965.00 AP 00408744 03/25/2020 STOR'EM SELF STORAGE 575.00 0.00 575.00 AP 00408745 03/25/2020 STREAMING MEDIA LIVE 650.00 0.00 650.00 AP 00408746 03/25/2020 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 1,350.00 1,350.00 AP 00408747 03/25/2020 THOMAS, ORLEATHA 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408748 03/25/2020 TICKETS.COM 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00408749 03/25/2020 TIREHUB LLC 1,101.34 0.00 1,101.34 AP 00408750 03/25/2020 TRIMMER, PATRICIA A 255.90 0.00 255.90 AP 00408751 03/25/2020 TYUS, IDA 411.00 0.00 411.00 AP 00408752 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 15,333.18 0.00 15,333.18 AP 00408753 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,100.20 0.00 1,100.20 AP 00408754 03/25/2020 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00408755 03/25/2020 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 301.45 0.00 301.45 AP 00408756 03/25/2020 UNITED WAY 60.00 0.00 60.00 AP 00408757 03/25/2020 UNIVERSAL MARTIAL ARTS CENTERS 1,347.50 0.00 1,347.50 AP 00408758 03/25/2020 UPLAND ANIMAL HOSPITAL 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00408759 03/25/2020 UPS 31.00 0.00 31.00 AP 00408760 03/25/2020 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 5.83 5.83 AP 00408765 03/25/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,694.65 0.00 5,694.65 AP 00408766 03/25/2020 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 4,818.47 0.00 4,818.47 AP 00408767 03/25/2020 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,114.00 0.00 1,114.00 AP 00408768 03/25/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 3,779.28 0.00 3,779.28 AP 00408769 03/25/2020 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 452.04 0.00 452.04 AP 00408770 03/25/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 7,537.77 1,928.61 9,466.38 *** AP 00408771 03/25/2020 WELLS, JUDITH 80.60 0.00 80.60 AP 00408772 03/25/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 2,550.00 0.00 2,550.00 AP 00408773 03/25/2020 WESTERN UNIVERSITY OF VET MEDICINE 370.00 0.00 370.00 AP 00408774 03/25/2020 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 1,024.89 0.00 1,024.89 AP 00408775 03/25/2020 WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES 5,700.00 0.00 5,700.00 AP 00408776 03/25/2020 WILLIAMS, OMAR 25.00 0.00 25.00 AP 00408777 03/25/2020 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 4,836.81 0.00 4,836.81 AP 00408778 03/25/2020 XEROX CORPORATION 1,201.04 0.00 1,201.04 AP 00408779 03/25/2020 YANG, FANG 61.05 0.00 61.05 AP 00408780 03/25/2020 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 679.20 0.00 679.20 AP 00408781 03/25/2020 ZOETIS US LLC 776.12 0.00 776.12 AP 00408782 03/26/2020 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM 0.00 1,666.26 1,666.26 AP 00408783 03/26/2020 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 1,400.12 1,400.12 AP 00408784 03/26/2020 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,281.91 2,281.91 AP 00408785 03/26/2020 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 245.78 245.78 AP 00408786 04/01/2020 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,562.30 0.00 5,562.30 AP 00408787 04/01/2020 ACEY DECY EQUIPMENT INC 2,284.72 0.00 2,284.72 AP 00408788 04/01/2020 ACTION AWARDS INC 41.58 0.00 41.58 AP 00408789 04/01/2020 ALCORN, RICHARD 86.19 0.00 86.19 AP 00408790 04/01/2020 ALL WELDING 1,090.00 0.00 1,090.00 AP 00408791 04/01/2020 ALTUM GROUP, THE 885.50 0.00 885.50 AP 00408792 04/01/2020 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 504.90 0.00 504.90 AP 00408793 04/01/2020 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 7 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 44 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408794 04/01/2020 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 215.45 0.00 215.45 AP 00408795 04/01/2020 ASSI SECURITY 970.00 1,335.00 2,305.00 *** AP 00408796 04/01/2020 AUTO AND RV SPECIALISTS INC. 64.68 0.00 64.68 AP 00408797 04/01/2020 AYALA, CLAUDIA 83.77 0.00 83.77 AP 00408798 04/01/2020 BC TRAFFIC SPECIALIST 64.65 0.00 64.65 AP 00408799 04/01/2020 BEE REMOVERS 295.00 0.00 295.00 AP 00408800 04/01/2020 BERN MARIE'S PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 1,042.15 0.00 1,042.15 AP 00408801 04/01/2020 BILL & WAGS INC 330.00 0.00 330.00 AP 00408802 04/01/2020 BISHOP COMPANY 497.99 0.00 497.99 AP 00408803 04/01/2020 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 0.00 6,696.94 6,696.94 AP 00408804 04/01/2020 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 151.79 0.00 151.79 AP 00408805 04/01/2020 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 88,775.56 0.00 88,775.56 AP 00408806 04/01/2020 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 2,485.96 0.00 2,485.96 AP 00408807 04/01/2020 C V W D 400.78 0.00 400.78 AP 00408813 04/01/2020 C V W D 48,810.31 342.41 49,152.72 *** AP 00408814 04/01/2020 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00408815 04/01/2020 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF TAX AND FEE ADMINISTRATION 6,144.52 0.00 6,144.52 AP 00408816 04/01/2020 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 64,263.08 0.00 64,263.08 AP 00408817 04/01/2020 CERVANTES, MIGUEL 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00408818 04/01/2020 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 2,880.00 0.00 2,880.00 AP 00408819 04/01/2020 CHINO MOWER AND ENGINE SERVICE 21.68 0.00 21.68 AP 00408820 04/01/2020 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 200.75 200.75 AP 00408821 04/01/2020 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 520.00 0.00 520.00 AP 00408822 04/01/2020 CORONA CLAY COMPANY INC 2,945.50 0.00 2,945.50 AP 00408823 04/01/2020 CUNNINGHAM, PATRICIA 82.16 0.00 82.16 AP 00408824 04/01/2020 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,178.11 0.00 2,178.11 AP 00408825 04/01/2020 DABNEY, KELSEY 104.00 0.00 104.00 AP 00408826 04/01/2020 DAVID S MASON INC 5,045.15 0.00 5,045.15 AP 00408827 04/01/2020 DENAULT, AMANDA 93.04 0.00 93.04 AP 00408828 04/01/2020 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 2,198.00 0.00 2,198.00 AP 00408829 04/01/2020 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 47.50 0.00 47.50 AP 00408830 04/01/2020 DIG SAFE BOARD 101.69 0.00 101.69 AP 00408831 04/01/2020 DIVERSIFIED UTILITY SERVICES INC 1,318.00 0.00 1,318.00 AP 00408832 04/01/2020 DM CONTRACTING INC 31,370.88 0.00 31,370.88 AP 00408833 04/01/2020 DOG WASTE DEPOT 2,064.53 0.00 2,064.53 AP 00408834 04/01/2020 DP SOLUTIONS INC 8,370.00 8,370.00 16,740.00 *** AP 00408835 04/01/2020 ECORP CONSULTING INC 3,420.00 0.00 3,420.00 AP 00408836 04/01/2020 EIGHTH AVENUE ENTERPRISE LLC 683.57 0.00 683.57 AP 00408837 04/01/2020 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00408838 04/01/2020 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY 284.43 0.00 284.43 AP 00408839 04/01/2020 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS 0.00 520.19 520.19 AP 00408840 04/01/2020 FAIRVIEW FORD 198.00 0.00 198.00 AP 00408841 04/01/2020 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 128.85 0.00 128.85 AP 00408842 04/01/2020 FEHR AND PEERS 20,545.00 0.00 20,545.00 AP 00408843 04/01/2020 FIRST AID 2000 3,341.07 0.00 3,341.07 AP 00408844 04/01/2020 FORD OF UPLAND INC 5,565.04 0.00 5,565.04 AP 00408845 04/01/2020 FORTIN LAW GROUP 9,369.55 0.00 9,369.55 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 8 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 45 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408846 04/01/2020 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS 0.00 205.37 205.37 AP 00408847 04/01/2020 FRONTIER COMM 3,403.16 0.00 3,403.16 AP 00408848 04/01/2020 FUEL SERV 1,641.01 0.00 1,641.01 AP 00408849 04/01/2020 GALANTI, WENDY 152.88 0.00 152.88 AP 00408850 04/01/2020 GATHRIGHT, ELAINE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408851 04/01/2020 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 738.60 0.00 738.60 AP 00408852 04/01/2020 GLOBALSTAR USA 172.59 0.00 172.59 AP 00408853 04/01/2020 GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH 178.88 0.00 178.88 AP 00408854 04/01/2020 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 186,552.00 2,228.00 188,780.00 *** AP 00408855 04/01/2020 GONSALVES AND SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00408856 04/01/2020 GRAINGER 1,020.35 150.69 1,171.04 *** AP 00408857 04/01/2020 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC. 140.08 0.00 140.08 AP 00408858 04/01/2020 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 3,398.05 0.00 3,398.05 AP 00408859 04/01/2020 GUARDADO, FAVIAN 152.88 0.00 152.88 AP 00408860 04/01/2020 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 568.57 0.00 568.57 AP 00408861 04/01/2020 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00408862 04/01/2020 HI -WAY SAFETY INC 464.73 0.00 464.73 AP 00408863 04/01/2020 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 0.00 120.20 120.20 AP 00408864 04/01/2020 ICE DATA PRICING AND REFERENCE DATA LLC 151.59 0.00 151.59 AP 00408865 04/01/2020 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 5,233.62 0.00 5,233.62 AP 00408866 04/01/2020 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 54.00 0.00 54.00 AP 00408867 04/01/2020 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 289.00 0.00 289.00 AP 00408868 04/01/2020 INTERNATIONAL COATINGS COMPANY INC 671.01 0.00 671.01 AP 00408869 04/01/2020 INTERSTATE BATTERIES 374.95 0.00 374.95 AP 00408870 04/01/2020 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 302.43 787.28 1,089.71 *** AP 00408871 04/01/2020 IRON MOUNTAIN OSDP 1,010.34 0.00 1,010.34 AP 00408872 04/01/2020 ITERIS INC 14,046.14 0.00 14,046.14 AP 00408873 04/01/2020 JOHNSON, MARK 76.63 0.00 76.63 AP 00408874 04/01/2020 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 3,560.56 0.00 3,560.56 AP 00408875 04/01/2020 LANCE SOLL AND LUNGHARD 5,254.00 468.00 5,722.00 *** AP 00408876 04/01/2020 LEARNING RESOURCES NETWORK INC 395.00 0.00 395.00 AP 00408877 04/01/2020 LIANG, EDDIE QIWEI 134.41 0.00 134.41 AP 00408878 04/01/2020 LOPEZ, PEDRO 3,796.00 0.00 3,796.00 AP 00408879 04/01/2020 LOUIE'S NURSERY 206.85 0.00 206.85 AP 00408880 04/01/2020 LOZANO SMITH LLP 205.50 0.00 205.50 AP 00408881 04/01/2020 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,677.67 0.00 1,677.67 AP 00408882 04/01/2020 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 110,094.84 4,072.00 114,166.84 *** AP 00408883 04/01/2020 MCI 33.50 0.00 33.50 AP 00408884 04/01/2020 MEDIA CONTROL SYSTEMS 61,153.42 0.00 61,153.42 AP 00408885 04/01/2020 MIDWEST TAPE 1,423.13 0.00 1,423.13 AP 00408886 04/01/2020 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 579.00 0.00 579.00 AP 00408887 04/01/2020 MISSION PATIO COVER ETC 336.53 0.00 336.53 AP 00408888 04/01/2020 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 30.17 0.00 30.17 AP 00408889 04/01/2020 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 284.32 0.00 284.32 AP 00408890 04/01/2020 NAPA AUTO PARTS 19.52 581.76 601.28 *** AP 00408891 04/01/2020 OGG, KRISTIN 45.34 0.00 45.34 AP 00408892 04/01/2020 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2,521.29 0.00 2,521.29 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 9 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408893 04/01/2020 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,323.62 234.41 1,558.03 *** AP 00408894 04/01/2020 PARKHOUSE TIRE INC 412.06 0.00 412.06 AP 00408895 04/01/2020 PELOTON INTERACTIVE INC 936.00 0.00 936.00 AP 00408896 04/01/2020 PIONEER MANUFACTURING 84.62 0.00 84.62 AP 00408897 04/01/2020 PIP PRINTING 326.32 0.00 326.32 AP 00408898 04/01/2020 PRO -LINE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS INC 2,432.45 1,757.17 4,189.62 *** AP 00408899 04/01/2020 PROMOTIONS TEES & MORE 2,426.55 0.00 2,426.55 AP 00408900 04/01/2020 PUNT CONSULTING GROUP 2,490.00 0.00 2,490.00 AP 00408901 04/01/2020 QUADIENT INC 540.46 0.00 540.46 AP 00408902 04/01/2020 R AND R AUTOMOTIVE 746.97 0.00 746.97 AP 00408903 04/01/2020 RANCHO CUCAMONGA TOWN SQUARE 10,089.49 0.00 10,089.49 AP 00408904 04/01/2020 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 36.10 0.00 36.10 AP 00408905 04/01/2020 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 101.62 0.00 101.62 AP 00408906 04/01/2020 RED ROBIN INTERNATIONAL INC 693.62 0.00 693.62 AP 00408907 04/01/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00408908 04/01/2020 RICHARD WIGHTMAN CONSTRUCTION INC 7,500.00 0.00 7,500.00 AP 00408909 04/01/2020 RODIA, DEAN 93.00 0.00 93.00 AP 00408910 04/01/2020 S C C E ELECTRICAL SERVICES 12,800.00 0.00 12,800.00 AP 00408911 04/01/2020 SAFE -ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 1,140.00 1,140.00 AP 00408912 04/01/2020 SAFEWAY SIGN COMPANY 522.59 0.00 522.59 AP 00408913 04/01/2020 SAN MARINO ROOF CO INC 4,800.00 0.00 4,800.00 AP 00408914 04/01/2020 SC FUELS 3,232.33 0.00 3,232.33 AP 00408915 04/01/2020 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 0.00 212.80 212.80 AP 00408916 04/01/2020 SHRED PROS 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00408917 04/01/2020 SIGN SHOP, THE 0.00 129.30 129.30 AP 00408918 04/01/2020 SMITH, THERESE 29.92 0.00 29.92 AP 00408920 04/01/2020 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 1,354.48 366.20 1,720.68 *** AP 00408927 04/01/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 9,673.09 1,571.08 11,244.17 *** AP 00408928 04/01/2020 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,938.33 0.00 1,938.33 AP 00408929 04/01/2020 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 179.75 0.00 179.75 AP 00408930 04/01/2020 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 140.08 0.00 140.08 AP 00408931 04/01/2020 SUPERION LLC 5,580.00 0.00 5,580.00 AP 00408932 04/01/2020 TAVERA, BRIANNA 52.94 0.00 52.94 AP 00408933 04/01/2020 TIMBERWOLFF CONSTRUCTION 134.41 0.00 134.41 AP 00408934 04/01/2020 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00408935 04/01/2020 TIREHUB LLC 2,891.98 0.00 2,891.98 AP 00408936 04/01/2020 TOT LOT PROS INC 98,100.00 0.00 98,100.00 AP 00408937 04/01/2020 TRAFFICWARE GROUP INC 4,109.83 0.00 4,109.83 AP 00408938 04/01/2020 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 113.95 0.00 113.95 AP 00408939 04/01/2020 UPS 123.21 0.00 123.21 AP 00408940 04/01/2020 UTILIQUEST 880.20 0.00 880.20 AP 00408941 04/01/2020 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,110.86 5,110.86 AP 00408942 04/01/2020 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 11,176.52 0.00 11,176.52 AP 00408943 04/01/2020 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 6,580.69 0.00 6,580.69 AP 00408944 04/01/2020 WASTE MANAGEMENT ENVIROSERV 3,081.34 0.00 3,081.34 AP 00408945 04/01/2020 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 18,326.41 0.00 18,326.41 AP 00408946 04/01/2020 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 46,576.00 0.00 46,576.00 User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 10 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00408947 04/01/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 10,821.65 0.00 10,821.65 AP 00408948 04/01/2020 WEST END YMCA/ RANCHO CUCAMONGA 9,479.98 0.00 9,479.98 AP 00408949 04/01/2020 WHITE CAP CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY 412.34 0.00 412.34 AP 00408950 04/01/2020 WHITE HOUSE PHOTO INC 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00408951 04/01/2020 WORD MILL PUBLISHING 725.00 0.00 725.00 AP 00408952 04/01/2020 WT.COX INFORMATION SERVICES 6,113.13 0.00 6,113.13 Total City: $2,686,090.53 Total Fire: $233,023.33 Grand Total: Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 11 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:34:28 Page 48 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara Layne, Finance Director SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE WEEKLY CHECK REGISTERS FOR CHECKS ISSUED TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,840.61 DATED MARCH 23, 2020 THROUGH APRIL 05, 2020. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council approve payment of demands as presented. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 So Ca Gas - Check Register Page 49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 3/23/2020 through 4/5/2020 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Citv Fire Amount AP 00408733 03/25/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 18.13 763.59 781.72 *** AP 00408919 04/01/2020 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 14,822.48 364.48 15,186.96 *** Total City: $14,840.61 Total Fire: $1,128.07 Grand Total:$15,968—.68 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ - VERONICA LOPEZ Page: 1 Current Date: 04/06/2020 Report: CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Time: 07:52:28 Page 50 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A RESOLUTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF RIGHT- OF-WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RELATED TO CASE NO. SUBTPM19855, SUBMITTED BY MONTE VISTA ASSETS, INC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution to vacate a portion of right-of- way on the south of Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue. BACKGROUND: On May 9, 1988, a portion of street right-of-way on the south side of Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue was dedicated by the Ewen property to the City of Rancho Cucamonga for street and related purposes. Subsequent to this dedication, Hillside Road was realigned as shown on the map of Tract No. 16430 leaving a triangular shaped remnant of right-of-way across the property currently being developed by Monte Vista Assets, Inc. (see Exhibit B in Attachment 2). On July 10, 2019, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map 19855 (Case No. SUBTPM19855) for the division of 3.04 acres into 4 parcels in conjunction with a proposed residential development consisting of 4 residences (3 new and 1 existing) single family parcels located on the south side of Hillside Road. The City Council approved Parcel Map 19855 on November 20, 2019 including a re -dedication of the 33 feet on the south side of Hillside Road following its current alignment. After the parcel map was recorded, it was determined that the triangular shaped remnant was not abandoned on the map. ANALYSIS: Monte Vista Assets, Inc. has submitted a request and legal description for the vacation of the remnant right-of-way generally located on the south side of Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue in order to effect the omitted abandonment. Street and Highways Code Section 8334(a) authorizes local agencies to vacate excess public right-of- way pursuant to adoption of a resolution if it is not needed for street or highway purposes. Staff has determined that the right-of-way in question is not necessary for current or future street or highway purposes and has prepared the attached resolution for consideration by the City Council. It should be noted that this resolution includes a reservation of public utilities easement to protect any existing public Page 51 utility facilities within the vacation area pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 8340. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's goal of Mid- and Long -Range Planning by implementing right-of- way actions consistent with the needs identified in the General Plan. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution to Vacate Page 52 Vicinity Map PM 19855 NOT TO SCALE i PROJECT LOCATION w a Z a W Q w S F - w WILSON AVENUE y VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE ATTACHMENT 1 A Page 53 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, SUMMARILY ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF- WAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF HILLSIDE ROAD BETWEEN AMETHYST AVENUE AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE RELATED TO CASE NO. SUBTPM19855 WHEREAS, by Chapter 4, Article 1, section 8334, of the Streets and Highways Code the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is authorized to summarily vacate excess right-of- way of a street or highway if it is not required for street or highway purposes; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff found and determined that the summary vacation of the subject rights herein contemplated conforms to the City's General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council found all the evidence submitted that the subject rights located on the south side of Hillside Road between Amethyst Avenue and Archibald Avenue, are unnecessary for present or prospective public purposes; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: SECTION 1: That City Council hereby orders vacating the excess street right-of-way as shown on map V-241, on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which have been further described in the legal description which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part thereof. SECTION 2: That the subject vacation shall be subject to the reservations and exceptions, if any, for existing utilities on record. SECTION 3: That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, said excess street rights-of-way no longer constitute a street or public easement. SECTION 4: That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this resolution to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, California. SECTION 5: That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution, and it shall thereupon take effect and be in force. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2020. Page 54 Exhibit "A' Legal Description LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR STREET VACATION PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THOSE PORTION OF PARCEL 1 AND PARCEL 4 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 19855, RECORDED IN BOOK 253, PAGES 38 AND 39, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 36, TRACT NO. 9569, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 139, PAGES 8 THROUGH I0, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HILLSIDE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP; THENCE S88013'47"E A DISTANCE OF 329.42 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE MOST SOUTH WESTERLY CORNER OF LAND CONVEYED TO SAID COUNTY FOR HILLSIDE ROAD BY DEED RECORDED JULY 11, 1972 IN BOOK 7974, PAGE 855, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF LOT 23 OF TRACT NO. 16430, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 301, . PAGES 40 THROUGH 42, OF MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF HILLSIDE ROAD AS SHOWN ON SAID MAP. CONTAINING 982 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. AND AS SHOWN ON EXHIBIT `B', ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. PREPARED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: Lqd S H ��SQ�tiN H10"411 \ f 0 ;`1- No. 5129 �fi0 .' 0 STEPH H. HACKETT, P.L.S 5129 9� OP CA``�Q�Z dAprojects\17-598_landex hillsideA parcel map\_title\_vacation\street vacation pm 19855.docx SHEET 1 OF I SHEETS Page 55 Exhibit "B" V-241 / �pA- LA ND\ y9c�G�� 5129 'i ;i CIL HILLSIDE ROAD PER TRACT NO 16430, M.B. 301/40-42 N'LY LINE OF SE 1/4, SE 1/4, ,SEC. 22, TIN, R7W - - - - ESTABLISHED BY R.S. 20/15 HILLSIDE ROAD 36 N88°13'47' I ' PARCEL 4 W ] O J29.42' ' 1 ' PARCEL 1 W 35 P.M. NO./ Q Q t ` 19855 34 P.M. B.', 2 3 / J8,- 39 PARCEL 3 T—, PARCEL 2 LEGEND. AREA OF DOC. 88-144615 0. R. TO BE VACATED �<� This Plat is Solely an Aid in Locating the Parcel(s) described in the Attached Document. Please refer to legal description for exact location. EXHIBIT �pc-y- -gyp �/ STREET VACA/ O SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: SHH DATE: 03/05/20 SW COR. CONVEYED TO S.B COUNTY FOR ROAD PURPOSES REC'D JULY 11, 1972 IN BK. 7974/855, O.R. AND NW COR. LOT 23, TRACT 16430, M.B. 301/40-42 23 14 LEN & SHEET 3090 Layton Stir et Aft Lome, CA W37 Tab 19091 94t-6817 Fam 10091 949=4897 OF 2 SHEETS CHECKED BY: LEH JN: 17-598 Drawing: D:\—Projects\17-598—Landex Hillside\Hillside Road Vacation Plat.dwg Last Saved: Mon Feb 03, 2020 — 10:54 AM Page 56 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Matthew Addington, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE TRACT MAP 20042, IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, IMPROVEMENT SECURITIES, AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION INTO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1, AND INTO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 2 LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CARNELIAN AVENUE, NORTH OF HILLSIDE AVENUE, RELATED TO CASE NO. SUBTT20042, AND SUBMITTED BY NEW WEAVER LANE, LLC. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the final map for Tract 20042; 2. Approve an Improvement Agreement for related public improvements and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement; 3. Accept security in the form of bonds and cash to guarantee completion of the related public improvements; 4. Adopt the attached resolutions ordering the annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 and Street Lighting Maintenance Districts Nos. 1 and 2. I�1 44XC T91"J L I I On June 14, 2017, Planning Commission approved Case No. SUBTT20042 to subdivide 18.2 acres of land into 26 single-family residential lots on the east side of Carnelian Street and north of Hillside Road. Case No. SUBTT20042 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including, street lights, curb and gutter, street trees, sidewalk and street improvements. ANALYSIS: The developer, New Weaver Lane, LLC has submitted a final map for consideration of approval. Staff has determined that the final map is in substantial conformity with the approved tentative map and conditions. Further, an improvement agreement and securities to guarantee the construction of the off- site public improvements in the following amounts have been submitted: Faithful Performance Bond, No. 4419127 $341,700.00 Labor and Materials Bond, No. 4419127 $341,700.00 Monumentation Deposit $4,374.00 Page 57 Approval of this item by the Council would approve the Tract Map 20042 and allow its recordation, approve the improvement agreement, accept the security for the construction of certain public improvements, and order the annexation into Landscape Maintenance District 2 and Street Lighting Districts 1 and 2. Copies of the agreement are available in the City Clerk's office. The Consent and Waiver to Annexation forms signed by the developer are also on file in the City Clerk's office. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annexations would satisfy the conditions of approval for the development and supply additional annual revenue into the landscape and lighting maintenance districts in the following amounts: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1: $2,397.46 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1: $462.02 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2: $1,039.22 Furthermore, the development would construct two Street Lights and install four Street trees that will be maintained by the City. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project Enhances Premier Community status by ensuring the construction of high-quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Resolution LMD1 Attachment 3 - Resolution SLD1 Attachment 4 - Resolution SLD2 Page 58 I Ls --Q-0-91 Hilislde Rd Vicinity Map SU BTT20042 NOT TO SCALE $#r pg Ln Hillside Rd ATTACHMENT 1 W165Paw.ay Gt Hillside d 11 Page 59 ATTACHMENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) FOR PROJECT CASE NO. SUBTT20042 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 1 of 5 Page 60 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 61 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: New Weaver Lane, LLC The legal description of the Property is: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 13 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, LOCATED WITHIN THE E. 1/2 OF SECTION 21, T.1 N., R.7 W., S.B.M. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 106126101-0000 Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 62 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2019/20 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City): Landscape Maintenance District No. 1(General City) (the "Maintenance District") represents various landscaped areas, parks and community trails located at various sites throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. As such, the parcels within this District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other LMD's within the City. Typically, new parcels within this District have been annexed upon development. The various sites maintained by the District consist of parkways, median islands, paseos, street trees, entry monuments, community trails and parks. The parks consist of Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project Case No. SUBTT20042: 4 Street Trees (Carnelian Street) Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 63 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2019/20 Landscape Maintenance District No.1 (General City): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $92.21 for the fiscal year 2019/20. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) for SUBTT20042: Land Use Basis EBU* Factor Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $92.21 Multi -Family Residential Unit 0.50 92.21 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 92.21 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 26 Parcels x 1.00 EBU Factor x $92.21 Rate per EBU = $2,397.46 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 64 ATTACHMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT20042 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 1 of 5 Page 65 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 66 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: New Weaver Lane, LLC The legal description of the Property is: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 13 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, LOCATED WITHIN THE E. 1/2 OF SECTION 21, T.1 N., R.7 W., S.B.M. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 106126101-0000 Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 67 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2019/20 Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on arterial streets throughout the City. These sites consist of several non-contiguous areas throughout the City. The sites maintained by the district consist of street lights on arterial streets and traffic signals on arterial streets within the rights-of-way or designated easements of streets dedicated to the City. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20042: 2 Street Lights (Carnelian Street) Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 68 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2019/20 Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $17.77 for the fiscal year 2019/20. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No.1 (Arterial Streets) for SUBTT20042: Land Use Basis EBU Factor* Rate per EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $17.77 Multi -Family Residential Parcel 1.00 17.77 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 17.77 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 26 Parcels x 1.00 EBU Factor x $17.77 Rate per EBU = $462.02 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 69 ATTACHMENT 4 RESOLUTION NO. XX - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN TERRITORY TO STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.2 (LOCAL STREETS) FOR CASE NO. SUBTT20042 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed a special maintenance district pursuant to the terms of the "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Act", said special maintenance district known and designated as Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Article 2 of Chapter 2 of the Act authorize the annexation of additional territory to the District; and WHEREAS, such provisions also provide that the requirement for the preparation of resolutions, and assessment engineer's report, notices of public hearing and the right of majority protest may be waived in writing with the written consent of all of the owners of property within the territory to be annexed; and WHEREAS, notwithstanding that such provisions of the Act related to the annexation of territory to the District, Article XIII D of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIII D") establishes certain procedural requirements for the authorization to levy assessments which apply to the levy of annual assessments for the District on the territory proposed to be annexed to such District; and WHEREAS, the owners of certain property described in Exhibit A attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, have requested that such property (collectively, the "Territory") be annexed to the District in order to provide for the levy of annual assessments to finance the maintenance of certain improvements described in Exhibit B hereto (the "Improvements"); and WHEREAS, all of the owners of the Territory have filed with the City Clerk duly executed forms entitled "Consent And Waiver To Annexation Of Certain Real Property To A Maintenance District And Approval Of The Levy Of Assessments On Such Real Property" (the "Consent and Waiver"); and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act to the annexation of the Territory to the District and have expressly consented to the annexation of the Territory to the District; and WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly waived any and all of the procedural requirements as prescribed in the Act and/or Article XIII D applicable to the authorization to levy the proposed annual assessment against the Territory set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and have declared support for, consent to and approval of the authorization to levy such proposed annual assessment set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto; and Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 1 of 5 Page 70 WHEREAS, by such Consent and Waiver, all of the owners of the Territory have also expressly agreed for themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns that: (1) The proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the District Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance and operation expenses of the Improvements; (2) The proposed annual assessment does not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit from the Improvements conferred on each parcel in the Territory. (3) Only the special benefits derived or to be derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements have been included in the proposed annual assessment. WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to order the annexation of the Territory to the District and to authorize the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That the above recitals are true and correct. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby finds and determines that: a. The annual assessments proposed to be levied on each parcel in the Territory do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each such parcel from the Improvements. b. The proportional special benefit derived by each parcel in the Territory from the Improvements has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the maintenance of the Improvement. C. Only special benefits will be assessed on the Territory by the levy of the proposed annual assessments. SECTION 3: This legislative body hereby orders the annexation the Territory to the District, approves the financing of the maintenance of the Improvements from the proceeds of annual assessments to be levied against the Territory and approves and orders the levy of annual assessments against the Territory in amounts not to exceed the amounts set forth in Exhibit C. SECTION 4: All future proceedings of the District, including the levy of all assessments, shall be applicable to the Territory. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 2 of 5 Page 71 Exhibit A Identification of the Owner and Description of the Property to be Annexed The Owner of the Property is: New Weaver Lane, LLC The legal description of the Property is: BEING A SUBDIVISION OF A PORTION OF LOT 5, BLOCK 13 OF THE CUCAMONGA HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION LANDS, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 6 OF MAPS, PAGE 46, LOCATED WITHIN THE E. 1/2 OF SECTION 21, T.1 N., R.7 W., S.B.M. Assessor's Parcels Numbers of the Property: 106126101-0000 Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 3 of 5 Page 72 Exhibit B Description of the District Improvements Fiscal Year 2019/20 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "Maintenance District") is used to fund the maintenance and/or installation of street lights and traffic signals located on local streets throughout the City but excluding those areas already in another local maintenance district. Generally, this area encompasses the residential area of the City west of Haven Avenue. The sites maintained by the District consist of street lights on local streets and traffic signals (or a portion thereof) on local streets generally west of Haven Avenue. Proposed additions to the Improvements for Project SUBTT20042: 2 Street Lights (Carnelian Street) Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 4 of 5 Page 73 Exhibit C Proposed Annual Assessment Fiscal Year 2019/20 Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets): The rate per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) is $39.97 for the fiscal year 2019/20. The following table summarizes the assessment rate for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) for SUBTT20042: Land Use Basis EBU Rate per Factor* EBU* Single Family Residential Parcel 1.00 $39.97 Multi -Family Residential Unit 1.00 39.97 Non -Residential Acre 2.00 39.97 The proposed annual assessment for the property described in Exhibit A is as follows: 26 Parcels x 1.00 EBU Factor x $39.97 Rate per EBU = $1,039.22 Annual Assessment Resolution No. XX -XXX — Page 5 of 5 Page 74 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ACCEPT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH STREET AND UTICA PER THE IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, RELATED TO PARCEL MAP 19823, AS COMPLETE, FILE THE NOTICE OF COMPLETION, AND AUTHORIZE RELEASE OF BONDS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Parcel Map 19823 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #800034532 and accept Maintenance Bond #800046453 for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Bond #800034534 six months after Council approval; and 4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map 19823 was approved by Planning Commission on December 13, 2017 for the subdivision of 13.96 acres into 3 parcels in conjunction with a proposed industrial development consisting of 3 industrial logistics building located on the northwest corner of 4th Street and Utica. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on August 1, 2018, in order to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re -inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, CP Logistics Utica, LLC., submitted Faithful Performance Bond #800034532 in the amount of $104,700 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond #800046453 to secure maintenance of the improvements through the one-year warranty period. Page 75 FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enhancing Premier Community Status through the construction of high quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 76 Vicinity Map PM 19823 NOT TO SCALE C-Oca-Co10 Bottling ARCD { 6th St Universal Technical Institute Tredamar)i St WaBa GrIll Ent&prlse at o -Rancho camanga Fourth St ,1nt5 Apart merits rcours S1 Tr BAI r� n ra Fourth St z 6th St _C u Y K ATTACHMENT 1 1 -HP Project Site Fourth St m Vintage Apartments Carnderi Landmark y Apartments- Concours partments rb rb n 4b Concours St Lot F ClUza s Busine °�. Bank Ari N Page 77 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CROSSING SURFACE INSTALLATION AGREEMENT WITH BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF NEW CONCRETE PANELS ON ARROW ROUTE AT RAILROAD SPUR CROSSING. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council 1. Approve the Crossing Surface Installation Agreement between the City and BNSF for the installation of new concrete panels on Arrow Route at Railroad Spur crossing and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents; and 2. Authorize transfers from the Contract Services line item to the Capital Projects line item in the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Budget for the accounts and funds listed in the Fiscal Impact section below. BACKGROUND: On October 8, 1996, the City Council approved a Cost and Maintenance Agreement between BNSF, formerly called The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company (C096-010), for the Arrow Route roadway widening and railroad spur line improvements. The Agreement includes, but is not limited to, rehabilitation of track, placing of rubber crossing surface, installation of flasher lights with gate type crossing warning system, grading, paving, drainage and sidewalks. A vicinity map is included as Attachment 1. In February 2018, staff and BNSF met at the site to converse about the needed repairs at the Arrow Route Spur Line. Staff indicated that the existing rubber panels are distorted beyond repair and uplifted in areas that have caused the asphalt pavement to separate at the joint line. In accordance with the Cost and Maintenance Agreement, BNSF is responsible to maintain the crossing automatic devices and that portion of the railroad crossing lying between two feet outside of and parallel to the railroad track including the rubber panels. No action was taken by BNSF at that time. Thereafter, between June 2018 to August 2019, staff and BNSF met multiple times at the Arrow Spur Line to discuss continuing safety concerns and possible options to resolve this issue. As noted above, multiple existing rubber panels have degraded and are in need of replacement. BNSF indicated rubber panel replacement is no longer viable and the new railroad crossing standard is concrete panel surfacing and stated that this upgrade goes beyond the Cost and Maintenance Agreement resulting in Page 78 the City needing to pay the cost for a concrete crossing surface. Staff referred BNSF staff to the maintenance terms of the agreement. No further action was taken by BNSF at that time. On September 24, 2019, staff and BNSF met at the City Hall to discuss the opportunity to work collaboratively on this joint effort to replace the existing rubber crossing with concrete panel surfacing. The following solution was decided during the meeting: BNSF will remove existing rubber panels and install a new concrete crossing surface for a width of 104 feet from the edge of the pavement on the North side of the tracks to the edge of pavement on the South side of the tracks. The new crossing surface will adequately cover all vehicular driving lanes at Arrow Route. BNSF will perform all necessary track work to accommodate the new concrete crossing surface within the BNSF easement or jurisdiction. • City will pay a fair share for the upgrade to the new concrete crossing surface install totaling $16,850. Design and construction costs related to roadway improvements required for the new concrete crossing surface will be paid for separately by the City. City to perform all necessary grading, paving and striping outside BNSF Right -of -Way; City cost estimated at $60,000. ANALYSIS: BNSF requires the City to execute an agreement prior to installing the concrete crossing surface and street improvements. This Agreement will continue for a period of ninety (90) working days to allow for the completion of the work. A copy of the Agreement is included as Attachment 2. Upon execution of crossing surface installation Agreement from BNSF, the City will release an informal public works bid. A contractor will be selected to perform the necessary work within the City right-of-way. Construction is anticipated to take place over one weekend from Friday night to Sunday morning in July 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: A preliminary estimate for the project is provided below. Staff will adjust the estimate accordingly once construction bids are received. Expenditure Category Amount Construction Contract $60,000 Construction Contingency (10%) $6,000 Cost Share to BNSF $16,850 Total Project Cost $82,850 Funding for this project is available from the following contract service line items. Funds will be utilized to pay fair share cost for the new concrete crossing surface, in addition to the cost of street construction required as part of the project. Account Funding Source Description Amount 1177303-5300 Measure I Fund (177) Contract Services $37,850 1174303-5300 Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (174) Contract Services $15,000 1001318-5300 Street Maintenance Fund (001) Contract Services $30,000 Total Project Funding $82,850 In order to appropriately account for these project costs, a transfer from the Contract Services line item to the Capital Project line items is required. Transfers will be made from the account numbers listed above to the following account numbers. Page 79 Account Funding Source Description Amount 1177303- 5650/1819177-0 Measure I Fund (177) Capital Projects Arrow @ RR Spur $37,850 1174303- 5650/1819174-0 Gas Tax R&T7360 Fund (174) Capital Projects Arrow @ RR Spur $15,000 1001318- 5650/1819001-0 Street Maintenance Fund 001 Capital Projects Arrow @ RR Spur $30,000 Total Transfer $82,850 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council Goal of Public Safety by installing new concrete crossing surface and upgrading the track. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Agreement Page 80 ATTACHMENT 1 BNSF SPUR LINE IMPROVEMENTS AT ARROW ROUTE WEST OF MILLIKEN AVENUE VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 81 ATTACHMENT 2 CROSSING SURFACE INSTALLATION AGREEMENT BNSF File No.: BF10016245 Mile Post 48.41 Line Segment 7608 U.S. DOT Number 026324C Pasadena Subdivision This Crossing Surface Installation Agreement (hereinafter called, this "Agreement") is entered into effective as of , 20_, by and between City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter called, "AGENCY") and BNSF Railway Company (hereinafter called, `BNSF"). WHEREAS, BNSF operates a freight transportation system by rail with operations throughout the United States and Canada; and WHEREAS, AGENCY desires to replace the existing rubber crossing surface at Arrow Route with a new concrete crossing surface; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements of the parties contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. BNSF Work. The Company will install a new concrete crossing surface for a width of 104 feet from the edge of the pavement on the North side of the tracks to the edge of the pavement on the South side of the tracks. The new crossing surface will adequately cover all vehicular driving lanes at Arrow Route. The Company will perform all necessary track upgrades to accommodate the new crossing surface. 2. AGENCY Work. AGENCY must construct the Project as shown on the attached Exhibit A and do all work ("AGENCY's Work") provided for in the plans and specifications for the Project, except railroad work that will be performed by BNSF hereunder. AGENCY must furnish all labor, materials, tools and equipment for the performance of AGENCY's Work. The principal elements of AGENCY's Work are as follows: (a) Design and Construction of Arrow Route Street; (b) Installation of a pavement marking stop bar in accordance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (hereinafter called, "MUTCD"); (c) Installation of advance warning signs in accordance with the MUTCD; (d) Perform all necessary grading and paving, including backfill of excavations and restoration of disturbed vegetation on BNSF's right-of-way; (e) Provide suitable drainage, both temporary and permanent; (f) Provide all barricades, lights, flagmen or traffic control devices as necessary, during the installation of the concrete pedestrian crossing surfaces; Page 82 (g) Construct concrete sidewalk surface on approaches to each track, if desired; and (h) Job site cleanup including removal of all construction materials, concrete debris, surplus soil, refuse, contaminated soils, asphalt debris, litter and other waste materials to the satisfaction of BNSF. 3. Payment; Invoicing. Upon execution of this Agreement by both parties hereto, Company will send Agency an invoice detailing the total amount owed by Agency for the new crossing surface. Company shall send to Agency a final invoice upon completion and Agency shall pay the final invoice within 60 days of receipt. Agency's total cost for the new crossing surface shall not exceed sixteen thousand eight hundred and fifty Dollars ($16,850). 4. Maintenance of the Crossing Surface. After installation of the new crossing surface is completed, BNSF will maintain, at its own cost and expense, the crossing surface, against normal wear and tear, in a satisfactory manner for the expected life of the crossing surface. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, BNSF shall be entitled to receive any contribution toward the cost of such maintenance made available by reason of any existing or future laws, ordinances, regulations, orders, grants, or other means or sources. 5. Vehicular Traffic during Installation. The AGENCY shall provide, at its own cost and expense, all necessary barricades, lights or traffic control devices for detouring vehicular/pedestrian traffic at the Arrow Route Street crossing during installation of the new crossing surface. 6. Drainage. The AGENCY agrees to allow BNSF to drain water from the Arrow Route Street crossing area into existing AGENCY storm drains, if such storm drains are available. Drain pipes and filter fabric necessary for such drainage will be furnished and installed by BNSF. 7. Roadway Surfacing Work. The AGENCY agrees to provide, at its sole cost and expense, enough asphalt to cover the distance between the existing roadway surface at Arrow Route Street/Ave and the new crossing surface on both sides of the track as well as the area between the tracks. 8. Contractor Requirements: AGENCY must require its contractor to comply with the obligations set forth in this Agreement, including Exhibit C and Exhibit C-1, and incorporate in each prime contract for construction of the Project, or the specifications therefor, the provisions set forth in Exhibit C and Exhibit C-1, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. No work shall be commenced within BNSF's right of way until the AGENCY's contractor shall have (i) executed and delivered to BNSF an agreement in the form of said Exhibit C-1 and (ii) delivered to and secured BNSF's approval of the required insurance. 9. Term. This Agreement begins on the effective date set forth above and remains in effect until completion of all work contemplated in this Agreement and AGENCY's payment of the amounts set forth in Section 3 above. Page 83 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed and attested by its duly qualified and authorized officials as of the day and year first written above. BNSF Railwav ComAanv: By: Printed Name: Title: AGENCY: City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Printed Name: Title: Page 84 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering Services - Utilities & Environmental SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERCROSSING ON 7TH STREET WEST OF HAVEN AVENUE WITH BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve License Agreement No. 20-65015 between the City and the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway Company for the installation of electric and fiber conduit under an existing BNSF railroad crossing on 7th Street west of Haven Avenue and authorize the Mayor to sign all necessary documents. 13 44TI CaafT L I ll� On June 27, 2019, the City Council approved a Capital Improvement Project for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU's) 7th Street Electric and Fiber Line Extension. This line extension is required in order to serve a new industrial warehouse development located on 7th Street and Center Ave with electric and fiber service. New electric and fiber distribution infrastructure needs to be constructed along 7th Street just west of Haven Ave. A portion of the RCMU line extension will cross under an existing BNSF railroad crossing. ANALYSIS: The BNSF requires the City to obtain a License Agreement prior to the installation of the electric and fiber infrastructure under the existing railroad crossing. The cost of the License Agreement will be a one-time fee of Three Thousand Seven Hundred dollars ($3,700), which will be paid for by the developer of the industrial development. The License Agreement shall continue for a period of 25 years with no annual fees. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City for obtaining the License Agreement with the BNSF Railway Company. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The expansion of RCMU's electric and fiber infrastructure continues to implement the City Council's Goals for Mid- and Long -Range Planning as well as Enhancing Premier Community Status through the careful planning of new utility service to new developments within RCMU's service area. Page 85 ATTACHMENTS: Description BNSF License Agreement Page 86 March 29, 2020 City of Rancho Cucamonga Attention: Mr. Fred Lyn 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Dear Mr. Lyn: Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 4200 Buckingham Rd., Suite 110 Fort Worth, Texas 76155 tel +1 817-230-2600, fax +1 817 306-8265 20-65015 Attached please find a copy of the requested contract for execution by an official authorized to execute contract agreements on behalf of your company. Please print two (2) copies execute and return both copies with original signature for completion on part of BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF") to this office, along with the following requirements: • A check in the amount of $3,700.00 payable to BNSF Railway Company which covers the contract fee. Please note the agreements cannot be executed by BNSF without an approved insurance certificate. If there are any issues with your insurance, you will be contacted by a member of the Risk Management team of BNSF Railway. 1. A Certificate of Insurance as required in the agreement. 2. A separate policy for Railroad Protective Liability Insurance as required in the agreement (ORIGINAL POLICY MUST BE PROVIDED). BNSF Railway Company will be the only insured party; OR; In lieu of providing a separate policy for Railroad Protective Liability Insurance, you may participate in the BNSF's Railroad Protective Policy by checking the appropriate box in the contract and including an additional $506.00 with your check. PLEASE ADVISE IF THIS PROJECT IS ARRA FUNDED. Licensee must ensure that each of its employees, contractors, agents or invitees entering upon the premises completes the safety orientation program at the website www.BNSFcontractor.com prior to entering upon the premises. The certification is good for one year, and each person entering the premises must possess the card certifying completion. Acceptance and deposit of any check by BNSF does not constitute an agreement between BNSF and Licensee for the requested license. BNSF shall not be obligated to hold the check in a separate fund, but may commingle the funds with other funds of BNSF, and in no event shall BNSF be responsible for interest on said funds. The enclosed permit is not a binding agreement and shall become binding only when, and if, it is executed by you and fully approved and executed by BNSF Railway Company. Upon completion on behalf of BNSF, one fully executed counterpart will be returned for your records. The specifications/plans you provided may differ from BNSF's minimum specification requirements. Therefore, prior to your installation, please review the Exhibit A to determine the specifications necessary for your installation. Please be informed that if contracts, fees, and insurance are not returned within sixty (60) days, the processing fee will increase to $1,600.00. Sincerely, Amanda Reyna Manager - Permits Attachment Page 87 Tracking #20-65015 LICENSE FOR ELECTRIC SUPPLY LINE ACROSS OR ALONG RAILWAY PROPERTY (Electric Light, Power Supply, Irrespective of Voltage, Overhead or Underground) THIS LICENSE FOR ELECTRIC SUPPLY LINE ("License") is made to be effective , 2020 (the "Effective Date") by and between BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, a Delaware corporation ("Licensor") and City Of Rancho Cucamonga, a(n) California municipality ("Licensee"). In consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: GENERAL Grant of License. Licensor hereby grants Licensee a non-exclusive license, subject to all rights, interests, and estates of third parties, including, without limitation, any leases, use rights, easements, liens, or other encumbrances, and upon the terms and conditions set forth below, to construct and maintain, in strict accordance with the drawings and specifications approved by Licensor as part of Licensee's application process (the "Drawings and Specifications"), an electric supply line containing a maximum of Four (4) conductor(s), together with its supporting or containing structures (collectively, the "Electric Supply Line"), across or along Licensor's rail corridor at or near the station of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, Line Segment 7608, Mile Post 41.20 as shown on the attached Drawing No. 78039, dated March 3, 2020, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference (the "Premises"). 2. Term. This License shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue for a period of twenty-five (25) years, subject to prior termination as hereinafter described. 3. Existing Improvements. Licensee shall not disturb any improvements of Licensor or Licensor's existing lessees, licensees, easement beneficiaries or lien holders, if any, or interfere with the use, repair, maintenance or replacement of such improvements. 4. Use of the Premises. Licensee shall use the Premises solely for construction, maintenance, and use of the Electric Supply Line in accordance with the Drawings and Specifications. Licensee shall not use the Premises for any other purpose. 5. Alterations. Except as set forth in this License, Licensee may not make any alterations to the Premises or permanently affix anything to the Premises or any buildings or other structures adjacent to the Premises without Licensor's prior written consent. COMPENSATION License Fee. Licensee shall pay Licensor, prior to the Effective Date, the sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($3,700.00) as compensation for the use of the Premises. Costs and Expenses. 7.1 For the purpose of this License, "cost" or "costs" and "expense" or "expenses" includes, but is not limited to, actual labor and material costs including all assignable additives, and material and supply costs at current value where used. 7.2 Licensee agrees to reimburse Licensor (pursuant to the terms of Section 8 below) for all costs and expenses incurred by Licensor in connection with Licensee's use of the Premises or the presence, construction and maintenance of the Electric Supply Line, including but not limited to the furnishing of Licensor's flaggers and any vehicle rental costs incurred, inspection coordination, safety, mobilization and/or other observation services described in this License (collectively, the "Services"). Licensee shall bear the cost of the Services when deemed necessary by Licensor's representative. Flagging costs shall include, but not be limited to, the following: pay for at least an eight (8) hour basic day with time and one- -1 - Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 88 Tracking #20-65015 half or double time for overtime, rest days and holidays (as applicable); vacation allowance; paid holidays (as applicable); railway and unemployment insurance; public liability and property damage insurance; health and welfare benefits; transportation; meals; lodging and supervision. Negotiations for railway labor or collective bargaining agreements and rate changes authorized by appropriate Federal authorities may increase flagging rates. Flagging rates in effect at the time of performance by the flaggers will be used to calculate the flagging costs pursuant to this Section 7. 7.3 Licensor, at is sole discretion, may elect to designate a third party (the "Scheduling Agent"), to perform and/or arrange for the performance of the Services. Payment Terms. All invoices are due thirty (30) days after the date of invoice. If Licensee fails to pay any monies due to Licensor within thirty (30) days after the invoice date, then Licensee shall pay interest on such unpaid sum from the due date until paid at an annual rate equal to the lesser of (i) the prime rate last published in The Wall Street Journal in the preceding December plus two and one-half percent (2-1/2%), or (ii) the maximum rate permitted by law. LICENSOR'S RESERVED RIGHTS Reserved Rights of Use. Licensor excepts and reserves the right, to be exercised by Licensor and any other parties who may obtain written permission or authority from Licensor: 9.1 to maintain, use, operate, repair, replace, modify and relocate any utility, power or communication pipe/lines/cables and appurtenances (other than the Electric Supply Line) and other facilities or structures of like character upon, over, under or across the Premises existing as of the Effective Date; 9.2 to construct, maintain, renew, use, operate, change, modify and relocate any tracks or additional facilities, structures and related appurtenances upon, over, under or across the Premises; or 9.3 to use the Premises in any manner as Licensor in its sole discretion deems appropriate, provided Licensor uses all commercially reasonable efforts to avoid material interference with the use of the Premises by Licensee for the purpose specified in Section 4 above. 10. Right to Require Relocation. If at any time during the term of this License, Licensor desires the use of its rail corridor in such a manner as would, in Licensor's reasonable opinion, be interfered with by the Electric Supply Line, Licensee shall, at its sole expense, within thirty (30) days after receiving written notice from Licensor to such effect, make such changes in the Electric Supply Line as in the sole discretion of Licensor may be necessary to avoid interference with the proposed use of Licensor's rail corridor, including, without limitation, the relocation of the Electric Supply Line, or the construction of a new electric line to replace the Electric Supply Line. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensee agrees to make all emergency changes and minor adjustments, as determined by Licensor in its sole discretion, to the Electric Supply Line promptly upon Licensor's request. LICENSEE'S OPERATIONS 11. Construction and Maintenance of the Electric SUDDIV Line. 11.1 Licensee shall not enter the Premises or commence construction unless accompanied by Licensor's representative, the Scheduling Agent or its designee. Licensee shall notify Licensor's Roadmaster, at least ten (10) business days prior to installation of the Electric Supply Line and prior to entering the Premises for any subsequent maintenance thereon. In the event of emergency, Licensee shall notify Licensor of Licensee's entry onto the Premises at the telephone number above as soon as practicable and shall promptly thereafter follow up with written notice of such entry. 11.2 Licensee's on-site supervisors shall retain/maintain a fully executed copy of this License at all times while on the Premises. -2- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 89 Tracking #20-65015 11.3 While on the Premises, Licensee shall use only public roadways to cross from one side of Licensor's tracks to the other. 11.4 Any contractors or subcontractors performing work on the Electric Supply Line or entering the Premises on behalf of Licensee shall be deemed servants and agents of Licensee for purposes of this License. 11.5 Under no conditions shall Licensee be permitted to conduct any tests, investigations or any other activity using mechanized equipment and/or machinery, or place or store any mechanized equipment, tools or other materials, within twenty-five (25) feet of the centerline of any railroad track on the Premises unless Licensee has obtained prior written approval from Licensor. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, perform all activities on and about the Premises, including without limitation all construction and maintenance of the Electric Supply Line, in such a manner and of such materials as not at any time to endanger or interfere with (i) the existence or use of present or future tracks, roadbeds, or property of Licensor, (ii) the safe operation and activities of Licensor or existing third parties, or (iii) the rights or interests of third parties. If ordered to cease using the Premises at any time by Licensor's personnel due to any hazardous condition, Licensee shall immediately do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing right of Licensor, the parties agree that Licensor has no duty or obligation to monitor Licensee's use of the Premises to determine the safe nature thereof, it being solely Licensee's responsibility to ensure that Licensee's use of the Premises is safe. Neither the exercise nor the failure by Licensor to exercise any rights granted in this Section will alter the liability allocation provided by this License. 11.6 Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, construct and maintain the Electric Supply Line in such a manner and of such material that the Electric Supply Line will not at any time endanger or interfere with (i) the existence or use of present or future tracks, roadbeds, or property of Licensor, (ii) the safe operation and activities of Licensor or existing third parties, or (iii) the rights or interests of third parties. The construction of the Electric Supply Line shall be completed within one (1) year of the Effective Date, and any subsequent maintenance shall be completed within one (1) year of initiation. Within fifteen (15) days after completion of the construction of the Electric Supply Line or the performance of any subsequent maintenance thereon, Licensee shall, at Licensee's own cost and expense, restore the Premises to substantially their state as of the Effective Date, unless otherwise approved in advance by Licensor in writing. On or before expiration or termination of this License for any reason, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, surrender the Premises to Licensor pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in Section 24 hereof. 11.7 Licensor may direct one or more of its field engineers or inspectors to observe or inspect the construction and/or maintenance of the Electric Supply Line at any time for compliance with the Drawings and Specifications and Legal Requirements (defined below). Licensee shall reimburse Licensor for the cost of such observation or inspection related services pursuant to Section 8. If ordered at any time to halt construction or maintenance of the Electric Supply Line by Licensor's personnel due to non-compliance with the Drawings and Specifications or any other hazardous condition, Licensee shall immediately do so. Notwithstanding the foregoing right of Licensor, the parties agree that Licensor has no duty or obligation to observe or inspect, or to halt work on, the Electric Supply Line, it being solely Licensee's responsibility to ensure that the Electric Supply Line is constructed and maintained in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and in a safe and workmanlike manner in compliance with all terms hereof. Neither the exercise of, nor the failure by Licensor to exercise, any right granted by this Section will alter in any way the liability allocation provided by this License. If at any time Licensee shall, in the sole judgment of Licensor, fail to properly perform its obligations under this Section 11, Licensor may, at its option and at Licensee's sole expense, arrange for the performance of such work as it deems necessary for the safety of its operations and activities. Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for all costs and expenses of such work, pursuant to the terms of Section 8. Licensor's failure to perform any obligations of Licensee shall not alter the liability allocation hereunder. 11.8 Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, construct and at all times maintain the Electric Supply Line in accordance with the National Electric Safety Code. -3- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 90 Tracking #20-65015 11.9 If the operation or maintenance of the Electric Supply Line at any time causes interference, including but not limited to physical interference from electromagnetic induction, electrostatic induction, or from stray or other currents, with the facilities of Licensor or of any lessee or licensee of Licensor, or in any manner interfere with the operation, maintenance, or use by Licensor of its right-of-way, tracks, structures, pole lines, signal and communication lines, radio, or other equipment, devices, other property or appurtenances thereto, Licensee agrees immediately to make such changes in the Electric Supply Line and furnish such protective devices and/or replacement equipment to Licensor and its lessees or licensees as shall be necessary, in the judgment of Licensor's representative, to eliminate such interference. The cost of such protective devices and their installations shall be borne solely by Licensee. If any of the interference covered by this Section 11.9 shall be, in the judgment of Licensor, of such importance to the safety of Licensor's operations as to require immediate corrective action, Licensee, upon notice from Licensor, shall either, at Licensor's election, cease using the Electric Supply Line for any purpose whatsoever and remove same, or reduce the voltage or load on the Electric Supply Line, or take such other interim protective measures as Licensor may deem advisable, until the protective devices and/or replacement equipment required by this Section 11.9 have been installed, put in operation, tested, and found to be satisfactory to correct the interference. 11.10 Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, remove all combustible material from around wooden poles on the Premises, if any, and will at all times keep the space around such poles free of such material, and if removal of such combustible material shall not be attended to with fifteen (15) days after having been requested by Licensor to do so, Licensor shall have the right itself to perform the work and Licensee hereby agrees to reimburse Licensor for the expense so incurred. 11.11 Cutting head must travel at 0.0% grade (or downward) beginning 25' (minimum) from centerline of track until it reaches a point 25' (minimum) from the centerline of track. Minimum pressure must be applied to pumping the slurry to the cutting head during drilling. This will deter the bentonite slurry used for lubrication from seeping up and fouling the track roadbed. A BNSF Flagman must be present during installation and will monitor the ballast and roadbed. 11.12 Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD). Cutting head must travel at 0.0% grade (or downward) beginning 25' (minimum) from centerline of track until it reaches a point 25' (minimum) from the centerline of track. Minimum pressure must be applied to pumping the slurry to the cutting head during drilling. This will deter the bentonite slurry used for lubrication from seeping up and fouling the track roadbed. A BNSF Flagman must be present during installation and will monitor the ballast and roadbed. 12. Boring and Excavation. 12.1 Prior to Licensee conducting any boring, excavation, or similar work on or about any portion of the Premises, Licensee shall contact the applicable State's call -before -you -dig utility location service to have 3rd parties mark the location of utilities. Licensee shall explore the proposed location for such work with hand tools to a depth of at least three (3) feet below the surface of the ground to determine whether pipelines or other structures exist below the surface, provided, however, that in lieu of the foregoing hand -tool exploration, Licensee shall have the right to use suitable detection equipment or other generally accepted industry practice (e.g., consulting with the State Infrastructure Corporation) to determine the existence or location of pipelines and other subsurface structures prior to drilling or excavating with mechanized equipment. Licensee shall request information from Licensor concerning the existence and approximate location of Licensor's underground lines, utilities, and pipelines at or near the vicinity of the proposed Electric Supply Line by contacting Licensor's Telecommunications Helpdesk, currently at 1-800-533-2891 (option 1, then option 7), at least ten (10) business days prior to installation of the Electric Supply Line. Upon receiving Licensee's timely request, Licensor will provide Licensee with the information Licensor has in its possession regarding any existing underground lines, utilities, and pipelines at or near the vicinity of the proposed Electric Supply Line and, if applicable, identify the location of such lines on the Premises pursuant to Licensor's standard procedures. Licensor does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of information relating to subsurface conditions of the Premises and Licensee's operations will be subject at all times to the liability provisions herein. -4- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 91 Tracking #20-65015 12.2 For all bores greater than 26 -inch diameter and at a depth less than 10.0 feet below bottom of rail, a soil investigation must be performed by Licensee and reviewed by Licensor prior to construction. This study is to determine if granular material is present, and to prevent subsidence during the installation process. If the investigation determines in Licensor's reasonable opinion that granular material is present, Licensor may select a new location for Licensee's use, or may require Licensee to furnish for Licensor's review and approval, in Licensor's sole discretion, a remedial plan to deal with the granular material. Once Licensor has approved any such remedial plan in writing, Licensee shall, at Licensee's sole cost and expense, carry out the approved plan in accordance with all terms thereof and hereof. 12.3 Any open hole, boring, or well constructed on the Premises by Licensee shall be safely covered and secured at all times when Licensee is not working in the actual vicinity thereof. Following completion of that portion of the work, all holes or borings constructed on the Premises by Licensee shall be: 12.3.1 filled in to surrounding ground level with compacted bentonite grout; or 12.3.2 otherwise secured or retired in accordance with any applicable Legal Requirement. No excavated materials may remain on Licensor's property for more than ten (10) days, but must be properly disposed of by Licensee in accordance with applicable Legal Requirements. LIABILITY AND INSURANCE 13. Liability and Indemnification. 13.1 For purposes of this License: (a) "Indemnitees" means Licensor and Licensor's affiliated companies, partners, successors, assigns, legal representatives, officers, directors, shareholders, employees, and agents; (b) "Liabilities" means all claims, liabilities, fines, penalties, costs, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, demands, judgments, and expenses (including, without limitation, court costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, costs of investigation, removal and remediation, and governmental oversight costs) environmental or otherwise; and (c) "Licensee Parties" means Licensee and Licensee's officers, agents, invitees, licensees, employees, or contractors, or any party directly or indirectly employed by any of them, or any party they control or exercise control over. 13.2 TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNITEES FOR, FROM, AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LIABILITIES OF ANY NATURE, KIND, OR DESCRIPTION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING FROM, OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART): 13.2.1 THIS LICENSE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ITS ENVIRONMENTAL PROVISIONS, 13.2.2 ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS GRANTED PURSUANT TO THIS LICENSE, 13.2.3 LICENSEE'S OCCUPATION AND USE OF THE PREMISES, 13.2.4 THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION AND STATUS OF THE PREMISES CAUSED BY OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY LICENSEE, OR 13.2.5 ANY ACT OR OMISSION OF ANY LICENSEE PARTY. 13.3 TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LICENSEE NOW AND FOREVER WAIVES, AND WILL INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD THE INDEMNITEES HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS THAT BY VIRTUE OF ENTERING INTO THIS LICENSE, LICENSOR IS A GENERATOR, OWNER, OPERATOR, ARRANGER, OR TRANSPORTER FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT, AS AMENDED ("CERCLA") OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS (DEFINED BELOW). NOTHING IN THIS LICENSE IS MEANT BY EITHER PARTY TO CONSTITUTE A WAIVER OF ANY INDEMNITEE'S -5- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 92 Tracking #20-65015 COMMON CARRIER DEFENSES AND THIS LICENSE SHOULD NOT BE SO CONSTRUED. IF ANY AGENCY OR COURT CONSTRUES THIS LICENSE TO BE A WAIVER OF ANY INDEMNITEE'S COMMON CARRIER DEFENSES, LICENSEE AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, HOLD HARMLESS, AND DEFEND INDEMNITEES FOR ANY LIABILITIES RELATED TO THAT CONSTRUCTION OF THIS LICENSE. IN NO EVENT AS BETWEEN LICENSOR AND LICENSEE AS TO USE OF THE PREMISES AS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS LICENSE SHALL LICENSOR BE RESPONSIBLE TO LICENSEE FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION OF THE PREMISES. 13.4 IF ANY EMPLOYEE OF ANY LICENSEE PARTY ASSERTS THAT HE OR SHE IS AN EMPLOYEE OF ANY INDEMNITEE, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, LICENSEE SHALL, AND SHALL CAUSE ITS CONTRACTOR TO, RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND, AND HOLD THE INDEMNITEES HARMLESS FROM AND AGAINST ANY LIABILITIES ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO (IN WHOLE OR IN PART) ANY SUCH ASSERTION INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ASSERTIONS OF EMPLOYMENT BY AN INDEMNITEE RELATED TO THE FOLLOWING OR ANY PROCEEDINGS THEREUNDER: THE FEDERAL EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT, THE SAFETY APPLIANCE ACT, THE LOCOMOTIVE INSPECTION ACT, THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT, THE RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT, AND ANY SIMILAR STATE OR FEDERAL STATUTE. 13.5 THE FOREGOING OBLIGATIONS OF LICENSEE SHALL NOT APPLY TO THE EXTENT LIABILITIES ARE PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF ANY INDEMNITEE, BUT SHALL APPLY TO ALL OTHER LIABILITIES, INCLUDING THOSE ARISING FROM OR ATTRIBUTED TO ANY OTHER ALLEGED OR ACTUAL NEGLIGENCE, INTENTIONAL ACTS, OR STRICT LIABILITY OF ANY INDEMNITEE. 13.6 Upon written notice from Licensor, Licensee agrees to assume the defense of any lawsuit or other proceeding brought against any Indemnitee by any entity, relating to any matter covered by this License for which Licensee has an obligation to assume liability for and/or save and hold harmless any Indemnitee. Licensee shall pay all costs and expenses incident to such defense, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees, investigators' fees, litigation and appeal expenses, settlement payments, and amounts paid in satisfaction of judgments. 14. Personal Property Risk of Loss. ALL PERSONAL PROPERTY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, FIXTURES, EQUIPMENT, OR RELATED MATERIALS UPON THE PREMISES WILL BE AT THE RISK OF LICENSEE ONLY, AND NO INDEMNITEE WILL BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGE THERETO OR THEFT THEREOF, WHETHER OR NOT DUE IN WHOLE OR IN PART TO THE NEGLIGENCE OF ANY INDEMNITEE. 15. Insurance. Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain during the term of this License the following insurance coverage: 15.1 Commercial General Liabilitv "CGL" Insurance. The policy will provide a minimum of $2,000,000 per occurrence and an aggregate limit of at least $4,000,000 but in no event will the coverage be in an amount less than the amount otherwise carried by Licensee. Coverage must be purchased on a post 2004 ISO occurrence form or equivalent and include coverage for, but not limited to, the following: ■ Bodily Injury and Property Damage ■ Personal Injury and Advertising Injury ■ Fire legal liability ■ Products and completed operations ■ Contractual Liability for an "Insured Contract" consistent with the definition under the standard ISO general liability policy form. b. The parties agree that the workers' compensation and employers' liability related exclusions in the CGL policy(s) are intended to apply to employees of the policyholder and will not apply to Licensor's employees. -6- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 93 Tracking #20-65015 c. No other endorsements that limit coverage with respect to Licensee's obligations under this agreement may be included on the policy. 15.2 Business Automobile Insurance. a. The insurance will provide minimum coverage with a combined single limit of at least $1,000,000 per accident, and include coverage for, but not limited to the following: ■ Bodily injury and property damage. ■ Any and all vehicles owned, used or hired. b. The policy will include the following endorsements or language, which will be indicated on or attached to the certificate of insurance: ■ Waiver of subrogation in favor of and acceptable to Licensor. ■ Additional insured endorsement in favor of and acceptable to Licensor. ■ Separation of insureds. ■ The policy shall be primary and non-contributing with respect to any insurance carried by Licensor. 15.3 Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Insurance. The policy will provide coverage of all employees performing any part of the work or services including coverage for, but not limited to: ■ Licensee's statutory liability under the workers' compensation laws of the state(s) in which the work or services are to be performed. The policy will cover all of Licensee's employees, regardless of whether such coverage is optional under the law of that state(s). ■ Employers' Liability (Part B) with limits of at least $500,000 each accident, $500,000 by disease policy limit, $500,000 by disease each employee. b. The policy will include contain the following endorsements or language, which shall be indicated on or attached to the certificate of insurance: ■ Waiver of subrogation in favor of and acceptable to Licensor. 15.4 Railroad Protective Liability Insurance. The policy will name only Licensor as the Insured and will provide coverage of at least $2,000,000 per occurrence and $6,000,000 in the aggregate. The coverage obtained under this policy shall only be effective during the initial installation and/or construction of the Electric Supply Line. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ELECTRIC SUPPLY LINE SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN ONE (1) YEAR OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE. If further maintenance of the Electric Supply Line is needed at a later date, an additional Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy shall be required. The policy will be issued on a standard ISO form CG 00 35 12 04 and include the following: ■ Endorsed to include the Pollution Exclusion Amendment. ■ Endorsed to include the Limited Seepage and Pollution Endorsement. ■ Endorsed to remove any exclusion for punitive damages. ■ Endorsed to include Evacuation Expense Coverage Endorsement. ■ No other endorsements restricting coverage may be added. ■ The original policy must be provided to Licensor and Licensee shall not perform services or work of any kind under this agreement until Licensor has reviewed and approved the policy. ■ The definition of "Physical Damage to Property" will be endorsed to read: "means direct and accidental loss of or damage to all property owned by any named insured and all property in any named insured's care, custody and control (including, but not limited to rolling stock and their contents, mechanical construction equipment or motive power equipment, railroad tracks, roadbeds, catenaries, signals, tunnels, bridges and buildings) arising out of the acts or omissions of the contractor named on the Declarations." -7- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 94 Tracking #20-65015 In lieu of providing a Railroad Protective Liability Policy, for a period of one (1) year from the Effective Date, Licensee may participate in Licensor's Blanket Railroad Protective Liability Insurance Policy available to Licensee or its contractor. The limits of coverage are the same as above. The cost is $506.00. ❑ Licensee elects to participate in Licensor's Blanket Policy; ❑ Licensee declines to participate in Licensor's Blanket Policy 15.5 Other Requirements. 15.5.1 Where allowable by law, no exclusion for punitive damages may be included in any policy. 15.5.2 Licensee agrees to waive its right of recovery against Licensor for all claims and suits against Licensor. In addition, Licensee's insurers, through the terms of the policy or policy endorsement, waive their right of subrogation against Licensor for all claims and suits. Licensee further waives its right of recovery, and its insurers also waive their right of subrogation against Licensor for loss of Licensee's owned or leased property or property under Licensee's care, custody, or control. 15.5.3 Allocated Loss Expense, including but not limited to defense costs and expenses, will be in addition to all policy limits for coverage under the insurance requirements. 15.5.4 Licensee is not allowed to self -insure without the prior written consent of Licensor. If Licensor allows Licensee to self -insure, Licensee shall directly cover any self-insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims in lieu of insurance. Any and all Licensor liabilities that would otherwise be covered by Licensee's insurance in accordance with the provisions of this agreement, will be covered as if Licensee elected not to include a self-insured retention or other financial responsibility for claims. 15.5.5 Prior to commencing any services or other work under this agreement, Licensee shall furnish to Licensor an acceptable certificate(s) of insurance from an authorized representative evidencing the required coverage(s), endorsements, and amendments. 15.5.6 Licensee agrees to provide evidence to Licensor that it has the required coverage in place at least annually or in the event of a renewal or material change of coverage. 15.5.7 Any insurance policy shall be written by a reputable insurance company acceptable to Licensor or with a current Best's Guide Rating of A- and Class VII or better, and authorized to do business in the state(s) in which the service is to be provided. 15.5.8 If the coverage provided by any of the insurance policies required by this agreement is purchased on a "claims made" basis, Licensee hereby agrees to maintain coverage in force for a minimum of three years after expiration, cancellation or termination of this agreement. 15.5.9 Licensee agrees to provide evidence to Licensor that it has the required coverage in place at least annually or in the event of a renewal or material change of coverage. 15.5.10 Licensee represents that this License has been thoroughly reviewed by Licensee's insurance agent(s)/broker(s), and that Licensee has instructed them to procure the insurance coverage required by this License. 15.5.11 Not more frequently than once every five years, Licensor may, at its discretion, reasonably modify the insurance requirements to reflect the then -current risk management practices in the railroad industry and underwriting practices in the insurance industry. 15.5.12 If Licensee will subcontract any portion of the operation, Licensee shall require that the -a- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 95 Tracking #20-65015 subcontractor provide and maintain insurance coverage(s) as set forth herein, naming Licensor as an additional insured. In addition, Licensee shall require that the subcontractor shall release, defend and indemnify Licensee to the same extent and under the same terms and conditions as Licensee is required to release, defend and indemnify Licensor under this agreement. 15.5.13 Failure to provide evidence as required by this section shall entitle, but not require, Licensor to terminate this License immediately. Acceptance of a certificate that does not comply with this section shall not operate as a waiver of Licensee's obligations hereunder. 15.5.14 The fact that Licensee obtains insurance (including, without limitation, self-insurance) shall not release or diminish Licensee's liabilities or obligations including, without limitation, the liabilities and obligations under the indemnity provisions of the License. Damages recoverable by Licensor shall not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage. 15.5.16 In the event of a claim or lawsuit involving Licensor arising out of this agreement, Licensee will make the policy covering such claims or lawsuits available to Licensor. 15.5.16 If Licensee maintains broader coverage and/or higher limits than the minimum requirements in this Agreement, Licensor requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage and/or the higher limits. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to Licensor. 15.5.17 These insurance provisions are intended to be a separate and distinct obligation on the part of the Licensee. Therefore, these provisions shall be enforceable and Licensee shall be bound thereby regardless of whether or not indemnity provisions are determined to be enforceable in the jurisdiction in which the work or services are performed under this License. 15.5.18 For purposes of this Section 15, Licensor shall mean "Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC", "BNSF Railway Company" and the subsidiaries, successors, assigns and affiliates of each. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS 16. Compliance with Laws, Rules, and Regulations. 16.1 Licensee shall observe and comply with any and all applicable federal, state, local and tribal laws, statutes, regulations, ordinances, orders, covenants, restrictions, or decisions of any court of competent jurisdiction ("Legal Requirements") relating to the construction, maintenance, and use of the Electric Supply Line and the use of the Premises. 16.2 Prior to entering the Premises, Licensee shall and shall cause its contractor(s) to comply with all of Licensor's applicable safety rules and regulations. Licensee must ensure that each of its employees, contractors, agents or invitees entering upon the Premises completes the safety orientation program at the Website "www.BNSFcontractor.com" (the "Safety Orientation") within one year prior to entering upon the Premises. Additionally, Licensee must ensure that each and every employee of Licensee, its contractors, agents and invitees possess a card certifying completion of the Safety Orientation prior to entering upon the Premises. Licensee must renew (and ensure that its contractors, agents or invitees, as applicable, renew) the Safety Orientation annually. 16.3 Licensee shall obtain on or before the date it or its contractor enters the Premises, any and all additional rights -of way, easements, licenses and other agreements relating to the grant of rights and interests in and/or access to the Premises (collectively, the "Rights") and such other rights, licenses, permits, authorizations, and approvals (including without limitation, any necessary local, state, federal or tribal authorizations and environmental permits) that are necessary in order to permit Licensee to construct, maintain, own and operate the Electric Supply Line and otherwise to perform its obligations hereunder in accordance with the terms and conditions hereof. -9- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 96 Tracking #20-65015 16.4 Licensee shall either require that the initial stated term of each such Rights be for a period that does not expire, in accordance with its ordinary terms, prior to the last day of the term of this License or, if the initial stated term of any such Right expires in accordance with its ordinary terms on a date earlier than the last day of the term of this License, Licensee shall, at its cost, exercise any renewal rights thereunder, or otherwise acquire such extensions, additions and/or replacements as may be necessary, in order to cause the stated term thereof to be continued until a date that is not earlier than the last day of the term of this License. 16.5 Upon the expiration or termination of any Right that is necessary in order for Licensee to own, operate or use the Electric Supply Line in accordance with the terms and conditions of this License, this License thereby shall automatically expire upon such expiration or termination of the Right. 17. Environmental. 17.1 Licensee shall strictly comply with all federal, state and local environmental Legal Requirements and regulations in its use of the Premises, including, but not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (RCRA), the Clean Water Act, the Oil Pollution Act, the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, and CERCLA (collectively referred to as the "Environmental Laws"). Licensee shall not maintain a treatment, storage, transfer or disposal facility, or underground storage tank, as defined by Environmental Laws on the Premises. Licensee shall not release or suffer the release of oil or hazardous substances, as defined by Environmental Laws on or about the Premises. 17.2 Licensee covenants that it will not handle or transport "hazardous waste" or "hazardous substances", as "hazardous waste" and "hazardous substances" may now or in the future be defined by any federal, state, or local governmental agency or body on the Premises. Licensee agrees periodically to furnish Licensor with proof, satisfactory to Licensor that Licensee is in compliance with the provisions of this Section 17.2. 17.3 Licensee shall give Licensor immediate notice to Licensor's Resource Operations Center at (800) 832-5452 of any known (i) release of hazardous substances on, from, or affecting the Premises, (ii) violation of Environmental Laws, or (iii) inspection or inquiry by governmental authorities charged with enforcing Environmental Laws with respect to Licensee's use of the Premises. Licensee shall use the best efforts to promptly respond to any release on, from, or affecting the Premises. Licensee also shall give Licensor immediate notice of all measures undertaken on behalf of Licensee to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such release or violation. 17.4 If Licensor has notice from Licensee or otherwise of a release or violation of Environmental Laws arising in any way with respect to the Electric Supply Line which occurred or may occur during the term of this License, Licensor may require Licensee, at Licensee's sole risk and expense, to take timely measures to investigate, remediate, respond to or otherwise cure such release or violation affecting the Premises or Licensor's right-of-way. 17.5 Licensee shall promptly report to Licensor in writing any conditions or activities upon the Premises known to Licensee which create a risk of harm to persons, property or the environment and shall take whatever action is necessary to prevent injury to persons, property, or the environment arising out of such conditions or activities; provided, however, that Licensee's reporting to Licensor shall not relieve Licensee of any obligation whatsoever imposed on it by this License. Licensee shall promptly respond to Licensor's request for information regarding said conditions or activities. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES 18. No Warranties. 18.1 LICENSOR'S DUTIES AND WARRANTIES ARE LIMITED TO THOSE EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS LICENSE AND SHALL NOT INCLUDE ANY IMPLIED DUTIES OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, NOW OR IN THE FUTURE. NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES HAVE BEEN MADE BY LICENSOR OTHER THAN THOSE CONTAINED IN THIS LICENSE. LICENSEE HEREBY WAIVES ANY AND ALL Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 97 Tracking #20-65015 WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO THE PREMISES OR WHICH MAY EXIST BY OPERATION OF LAW OR IN EQUITY, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. 18.2 LICENSOR MAKES NO WARRANTY, REPRESENTATION OR CONDITION OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, CONCERNING (A) THE SCOPE OF THE LICENSE OR OTHER RIGHTS GRANTED HEREUNDER TO LICENSEE OR (B) WHETHER OR NOT LICENSEE'S CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, OWNERSHIP, USE OR OPERATION OF THE ELECTRIC SUPPLY LINE WILL VIOLATE OR INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS, INTERESTS AND ESTATES OF THIRD PARTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY LEASES, USE RIGHTS, EASEMENTS AND LIENS OF ANY THIRD PARTY. 19. Disclaimer of Warranty for Quiet Enjoyment. LICENSOR DOES NOT WARRANT ITS TITLE TO THE PREMISES NOR UNDERTAKE TO DEFEND LICENSEE IN THE PEACEABLE POSSESSION OR USE THEREOF. NO COVENANT OF QUIET ENJOYMENT IS MADE. 20. Eviction at Risk of Licensee. In case of the eviction of Licensee by anyone owning, claiming title to, or claiming any interest in the Premises, or by the abandonment by Licensor of the affected rail corridor, Licensor shall not be liable (i) to refund Licensee any compensation paid hereunder, except for the pro -rata part of any recurring charge paid in advance, or (ii) for any damages or costs Licensee sustains in connection with the eviction. LIENS AND TAXES 21. Liens and Charges. Licensee shall promptly pay and discharge any and all liens arising out of any construction, alterations or repairs done, suffered or permitted to be done by Licensee on the Premises. Licensor is hereby authorized to post any notices or take any other action upon or with respect to the Premises that is or may be permitted by law to prevent the attachment of any such liens to the Premises; provided, however, that failure of Licensor to take any such action shall not relieve Licensee of any obligation or liability under this Section 21 or any other Section of this License. 22. Taxes. Licensee shall pay when due any taxes, assessments or other charges (collectively, "Taxes") levied or assessed by any governmental or quasi -governmental body upon the Electric Supply Line or any other improvements constructed or installed on the Premises by or for Licensee (collectively, the "Improvements") or any Taxes levied or assessed against Licensor or the Premises that are attributable to the Improvements. DEFAULT, TERMINATION, AND SURRENDER 23. Default and Termination. In addition to and not in limitation of Licensor's right to terminate for failure to provide evidence of insurance as required pursuant to the terms of Section 15, the following events are also deemed to be events of default pursuant to which Licensor has the right to terminate as set forth below: 23.1 If default shall be made in any of Licensee's covenants, agreements, or obligations contained in this License and Licensee fails to cure said default within thirty (30) days after written notice is provided to Licensee by Licensor, or in case of any assignment or transfer of this License in violation of Section 26 below, Licensor may, at its option, terminate this License by serving five (5) days' notice in writing upon Licensee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Licensor shall have the right to terminate this License immediately if Licensee fails to provide evidence of insurance as required in Section 15. 23.2 Should Licensee not comply fully with the obligations of Section 17 regarding the handling or transporting of hazardous waste or hazardous material, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this License, Licensor may, at its option, terminate this License by serving five (5) days' notice of termination upon Licensee. 23.3 Any waiver by Licensor of any default or defaults shall not constitute a waiver of the right to terminate this License for any subsequent default or defaults, nor shall any such waiver in any way affect Licensor's ability to enforce any Section of this License. The remedies set forth in this Section 23 shall be in addition to, Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 98 Tracking #20-65015 and not in limitation of, any other remedies that Licensor may have at law or in equity. 23.4 In addition to and not in limitation of Licensor's rights to terminate this License for failure to provide evidence of insurance or occurrence of defaults as described above, this License may be terminated by either party, at any time, by serving thirty (30) days' written notice of termination upon the other party. Such termination shall not release either party hereto from any liability or obligation under the License, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination or thereafter in case by the terms of the License it is provided that anything shall or may be done after termination hereof. 24. Surrender of the Premises. 24.1 On or before expiration or termination of this License for any reason, Licensee shall, at its sole cost and expense: 24.1.1 if so directed by Licensor in writing, remove the Improvements, the Electric Supply Line and all appurtenances thereto, or, at the sole discretion of Licensor, appropriately decommission the Electric Supply Line with a method satisfactory to Licensor; 24.1.2 report and restore any damage to the Premises or Licensor's other property arising from, growing out of, or connected with Licensee's use of the Premises; 24.1.3 remedy any unsafe conditions on the Premises created or aggravated by Licensee; and 24.1.4 leave the Premises in substantially the condition which existed as of the Effective Date or as otherwise agreed to by Licensor. 24.2 Upon any expiration or termination of this License, if Licensee fails to surrender the Premises to Licensor or if Licensee fails to complete its obligations under Section 24.1 above (the "Restoration Obligations"), Licensee shall have a limited license to enter upon the Premises solely to the extent necessary for Licensee to complete the Restoration Obligations, and all liabilities and obligations of Licensee hereunder shall continue in effect until the Premises are surrendered and the Restoration Obligations are completed. Neither termination nor expiration shall release Licensee from any liability or obligation under this License, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination, or, if later, the date when Licensee surrenders the Premises and all of the Restoration Obligations are completed. 24.3 If Licensee fails to complete the Restoration Obligations within thirty (30) days after the date of such termination of its tenancy, then Licensor may, at its election, either: (i) remove the Electric Supply Line and the other Improvements or otherwise restore the Premises, and in such event Licensee shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of bill therefor, reimburse Licensor for cost incurred, (ii) upon written notice to Licensee, take and hold the Electric Supply Line and the other Improvements and personal property as its sole property, without payment or obligation to Licensee therefor, or (iii) specifically enforce Licensee's obligation to restore and/or pursue any remedy at law or in equity against Licensee for failure to so restore. Further, if Licensor has consented to the Electric Supply Line and the other Improvements remaining on the Premises following termination, Licensee shall, upon request by Licensor, provide a bill of sale in a form acceptable to Licensor conveying the Electric Supply Line and the other Improvements to Licensor for no additional consideration. MISCELLANEOUS 25. Successors and Assigns. All provisions contained in this License shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the respective successors and assigns of Licensor and Licensee to the same extent as if each such successor and assign was named a party to this License. -12- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 99 Tracking #20-65015 26. Assignment. 26.1 Licensee may not sell, assign, transfer, or hypothecate this License or any right, obligation, or interest herein (either voluntarily or by operation of law, merger, or otherwise) without the prior written consent of Licensor, which consent may not be unreasonably withheld or delayed by Licensor. Any attempted assignment by Licensee in violation of this Section 26 shall be a breach of this License and, in addition, shall be voidable by Licensor in its sole and absolute discretion. 26.2 For purposes of this Section 26, the word "assign" shall include without limitation (a) any sale of the equity interests of Licensee following which the equity interest holders of Licensee immediately prior to such sale own, directly or indirectly, less than 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting equity interests of Licensee, (b) any sale of all or substantially all of the assets of (i) Licensee and (ii) to the extent such entities exist, Licensee's parent and subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (c) any reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation involving Licensee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation following which the equity interest holders of Licensee immediately prior to such reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation own, directly or indirectly, at least 50% of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting equity interests of Licensee or any successor thereto or the entity resulting from such reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation shall not be deemed an assignment. THIS LICENSE SHALL NOT RUN WITH THE LAND WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF LICENSOR, SUCH CONSENT TO BE IN LICENSOR'S SOLE DISCRETION. 26.3 Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 26.1 above or anything contained in this License to the contrary, if Licensee sells, assigns, transfers, or hypothecates this License or any interest herein in contravention of the provisions of this License (a "Purported Assignment") to another party (a "Purported Transferee"), the Purported Transferee's enjoyment of the rights and privileges granted under this License shall be deemed to be the Purported Transferee's agreement to be bound by all of the terms and provisions of this License, including but not limited to the obligation to comply with the provisions of Section 15 above concerning insurance requirements. In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing, Licensee, for itself, its successors and assigns, shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless Licensor for all Liabilities of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or related to (in whole or in part) a Purported Assignment. The provisions of this Section 26.3 shall survive the expiration or earlier termination of this License. 26.4 Licensor shall have the right to transfer and assign, in whole or part, all of its rights and obligations under this License, and upon any such transfer or assignment, Licensor shall be released from any further obligations hereunder and Licensee agrees to look solely to the successor in interest of Licensor for the performance of such obligations. 27. Notices. Any notice, invoice, or other writing required or permitted to be given hereunder by one party to the other shall be in writing and the same shall be given and shall be deemed to have been served and given if (i) placed in the United States mail, certified, return receipt requested, or (ii) deposited into the custody of a nationally recognized overnight delivery service, addressed to the party to be notified at the address for such party specified below, or to such other address as the party to be notified may designate by giving the other party no less than thirty (30) days' advance written notice of such change in address. If to Licensor: Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 4200 Buckingham Rd., Suite 110 Fort Worth, TX 76155 Attn: Permits/Licenses with a copy to: BNSF Railway Company 2301 Lou Menk Dr., GOB -3W Fort Worth, TX 76131 Attn: Senior Manager Real Estate -13- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 100 Tracking #20-65015 If to Licensee: City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 28. Survival. Neither termination nor expiration will release either party from any liability or obligation under this License, whether of indemnity or otherwise, resulting from any acts, omissions or events happening prior to the date of termination or expiration, or, if later, the date when the Electric Supply Line and the other Improvements are removed and the Restoration Obligations are completed in accordance with the terms hereof. 29. Recordation. It is understood and agreed that this License shall not be placed or allowed to be placed on public record. 30. Applicable Law. All questions concerning the interpretation or application of provisions of this License shall be decided according to the substantive laws of the State of Texas without regard to conflicts of law provisions. 31. Severability. To the maximum extent possible, each provision of this License shall be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this License shall be prohibited by, or held to be invalid under, applicable law, such provision shall be ineffective solely to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, and this shall not invalidate the remainder of such provision or any other provision of this License. 32. Integration. This License is the full and complete agreement between Licensor and Licensee with respect to all matters relating to Licensee's use of the Premises, and supersedes any and all other agreements between the parties hereto relating to Licensee's use of the Premises as described herein. However, nothing herein is intended to terminate any surviving obligation of Licensee or Licensee's obligation to defend and hold Licensor harmless in any prior written agreement between the parties. 33. Joint and Several Liability. If Licensee consists of two or more parties, all the covenants and agreements of Licensee herein contained shall be the joint and several covenants and agreements of such parties. 34. Waiver. The waiver by Licensor of the breach of any provision herein by Licensee shall in no way impair the right of Licensor to enforce that provision for any subsequent breach thereof. 35. Interpretation. 35.1 This License shall be interpreted in a neutral manner, and not more strongly for or against any party based upon the source of the draftsmanship; both parties hereby agree that this License shall not be subject to the principle that a contract would be construed against the party which drafted the same. Article titles, headings to sections and paragraphs and the table of contents (if any) are inserted for convenience of reference only and are not intended to be a part or to affect the meaning or interpretation hereof. The exhibit or exhibits referred to herein shall be construed with and as an integral part of this License to the same extent as if they were set forth verbatim herein. 35.2 As used herein, "include", "includes" and "including" are deemed to be followed by "without limitation" whether or not they are in fact followed by such words or words of like import; "writing", "written" and comparable terms refer to printing, typing, lithography and other means of reproducing words in a visible form; references to any person are also to that person's successors and permitted assigns; "hereof', "herein", "hereunder" and comparable terms refer to the entirety hereof and not to any particular article, section, or other subdivision hereof or attachment hereto; references to any gender include references to the masculine or feminine as the context requires; references to the plural include the singular and vice versa; and references to this License or other documents are as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time. 36. Counterparts. This License may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall, for all purposes, be deemed an original but which together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and the signature pages from any counterpart may be appended to any other counterpart to assemble fully executed documents, and counterparts of this License may also be exchanged electronically and any electronic version of any party's signature shall be -14- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 101 Tracking #20-65015 deemed to be an original signature for all purposes. 37. Licensor's Representative. Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. is acting as representative for BNSF Railway Company. END OF PAGE — SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS -15- Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 102 This License has been duly executed by the parties hereto as of the Effective Date. LICENSOR- BNSF Railway Company, a Delaware corporation By: Jones Lang LaSalle Brokerage, Inc. 4200 Buckingham Road, Suite 110 Fort Worth, TX 76155 By: Title: Date: LICENSEE: City of Rancho Cucamonga, a(n) California municipality By: Title: Date: Tracking #20-65015 Form 421: Rev. 20190916 Page 103 COORDINATE SYSTEM: CA 5 EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED TO CONTRACT BETWEEN BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALE:1 IN = 50 FT :ALIFORNIA DIV. CAX: SAN GABRIEL SUBDIV. .S. 7608 MP: 41.20 ATE: 3/3/2020 20' 4--► Q z Q 9 Z. 0 U- 0 r i TRACKING NO. 20-65015 0 0 Co 0 N w Q SECTION: 14 TOWNSHIP & RANGE: 1S 7W MERIDIAN: SBM 20' 7th St -- —' MP 41.20 q 34.088562, -117.578413 i I— V Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, ONES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User 6pommunity NOTE: 1-20" STEEL CONDUIT W/ 2-4" PVC SCH 80 OCCUPIED W/ 1-288 CORNING FIBER STRAND CABLE DESCRIPTION OF WIRES UNDER TRACK 1 VACANT WIRES LOCATED AS SHOWN BOLD 2-6" PVC SCH 80 OCCUPIED W/ ELECTRIC / 1 -ELECTRIC WIRE TYPE FIBER OPTIC SIZE OF CONDUIT 20" 1 VACANT NUMBER OF CONDUITS 1 CONDUIT MATERIAL STEEL VOLTAGE 12KV WALLTHICKNESS 0.281" LENGTH ON R/W 20' NOTE: CONDUIT TO BE INSTALLED BY HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILL BASE OF RAIL TO TOP OF CONDUIT 10' RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CA NAF DRAWING NO. 78039 Page 104 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF A CONTRACT WITH ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT IN THE AMOUNT OF $196,232, PLUS A 10% CONTINGENCY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2019/20 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project on file with the City Engineer (Project); 2. Accept the bids received for the Project; 3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $196,232 to the lowest responsive bidder, All American Asphalt for the total bid; 4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $19,623; 5. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount $36,780 to Aufbau Corporation for on-call construction inspection services; and 6. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $17,790 to Ninyo and Moore for on-call materials testing services. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga uses a method known as slurry seal to restore existing asphalt pavement comprised of minor cracks throughout the roadway. Slurry seal is the application of a mixture of water, asphalt emulsion, aggregate and additives to an existing asphalt pavement surface. Slurry seal provides a new wear surface over existing asphalt pavement reducing the need for costly repairs. A typical life expectancy for slurry seal is estimated between five and eight years. Engineering staff used its Pavement Management System (PMS) to determine the list of neighborhood streets to be resurfaced. PMS is a planning tool that analyzes existing pavement conditions and identifies good, fair, and poor conditions. A vicinity map illustrating the various neighborhood streets scheduled this fiscal year for slurry seal is included as Attachment 1. ANALYSIS: The scope of work to be performed consists of weed kill, routing and crack sealing, application of slurry seal, protecting existing manholes and valves, restriping and installation of pavement markings. The contract documents call for thirty (30) working days to complete this construction. Page 105 The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin on March 17 and March 24, 2020. The City Clerk's Office facilitated the formal solicitation for bidding the project. On March 31, 2020, the City Clerk office received five (5) construction bids. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $270,000. The apparent low bidder, All American Asphalt, submitted a bid in the amount of $196,232. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2. Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder All American Asphalt., meet the requirements of the bid documents. Environmental: Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Article 19. Categorical Exemptions. In Accordance with Section 15301 "Existing Facilities" subsection (c), Class 1 projects consist of minor alteration of existing public facilities, therefore, the Fiscal Year 2019/20 Local Slurry Seal Pavement Rehabilitation Project is considered categorically exempt from CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated construction costs for this project are estimated to be as follows: Expenditure Category Amount Construction Contract $196,232 Construction Contract Contingency (10%) $19,623 Construction Inspection Services $36,780 Construction Materials testing $17,790 Estimated Construction Costs $270,425 A total of $1,900,000 has been budgeted in Fiscal Year 2019/20 from the Measure I (Fund 176), Measure I (Fund 177), and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (Fund 179) for local overlay and slurry seal street resurfacing projects. Funding for this project continues to be available under the Capital Improvement Project Account No.'s in the amounts listed below: Account No. Funding Source Description Amount 11763035650/1022176-0 Measure I Fund (176) Local Street Rehab $200,000 11773035650/1022177-0 Measure I Fund (177) Local Street Rehab $70,425 Total Project Funding $270,425 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project will restore the existing road surface and extending the pavement life, use and rideability, thus enhancing the City's position as the Premier Community Status in our region. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Vicinity map Attachment 2 - Bid Summary Page 106 ATTACHMENT 1 P ROJ ECT# 800-2020-01 Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE 1IT 7 l W+ e fr r�I fD • S / 3 3 ►�1 • plmOnd St beer Creek 1 ` Channel I I } Hillside Rd Hlllslde Rd [4+Ilside Rff 4 y I ' Creyy� } r yd4l5on Ave I WiPson Ave n �•�; ' Thero-eq}�pred`' y Chaffey • � CollegeSchaol •• Y • x afi Banyan St Banyan St `�Banyvj5t M catch •• Leman Ave Lemon Ave �inta9t vin 8asirr' rd < n Alta Loma DF i Alta Loma Proiect SiteLA LL • C * -0 rt Victoria S[ Grapeland Etiwanda, 'r m � c Upland Hills�` ° `m Country * m Base, Line Rd @ a a Country Cluh a +Y a t q a w • ! q O N ! y E « C Gth St I a q t _ tJ m 15 f s fZdfl{M9 Q C' a ° Cu�arriongaVI row Hwy y { Arrow Rte Arrow Rte 1 { a ro I 2 m 9th St m 10 North jersey Blvd Whittraln Ave u user E Uth?F • 8th St Cucarnanga I �t �f►gda5t E 7th St y z ❑ 16 E 6th St ° 1 < 6th St° I ° o mIV ■• F E � � v � E dth�5t rn • . . . -".9t . .. d*Ot .w . Fw11" 9t• 4 San Bernardino Ave Project Site LI Page 107 BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MARCH 31, 2020 APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 4 5 FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 LOCAL SLURRY SEAL PAVEMENT All American Asphalt Pavement Coatings Co. Doug Martin Contracting American Asphalt South, Roy Allan Slurry Seal, REHABILITATION Company, Inc. Inc Inc. ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE BID SCHEDULE UNIT COST BID AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT UNIT I COST BID AMOUNT UNIT COST BID AMOUNT NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION 1 1 LS Mobilization $15,200.00 $15,200.00 $18,500.00 $18,500.00 $58,000.00 $58,000.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Slurry Seal Type II, Emulsion Aggregate Slurry (EAS) with $2.25 $226,800.00 $1.54 $155,232.00 $1.40 $141,120.00 $2.06 $207,648.00 $2.35 $236,880.00 $2.89 $291,312.00 2 100,800 SY Latex Replacement of Striping and Pavement Markings and Markers. (Note: All Legends, Symbols, Limit Lines and $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 $9,200.00 $9,200.00 $8,975.00 $8,975.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00 $11,436.70 $11,436.70 3 1 LS Crosswalks shall be Thermoplastic) 41 11 LS Traffic Control 1$10'000.001 $10,000.001 $10,000.001 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.001 $6,500.001 $6,500.001 $10,000.001 $10,000.001 $7,800.001 $7,800.00 TOTAL BID SCHEDULE AMOUNT: $270,000.00 $196,232.00 $2189320.00 $226,623.00 $266,380.00 $322,548.70 Page 108 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO SCHEDULE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR PLACEMENT OF LIENS FOR DELINQUENT SOLID WASTE ACCOUNTS. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council schedule a public hearing for the placement of special assessments/liens for delinquent solid waste accounts on May 20, 2020, during the regularly scheduled council meeting. BACKGROUND: Per Section 8.17.170 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the requirements are established for mandatory payment for residential, commercial and industrial solid waste collection service. As a result, the municipal code requires all occupied properties within the City to have weekly solid waste collection service, provided by the existing franchise waste hauler, or comply with the requirements terms of the self -haul permit program administered by City staff. This section of the code allow fees that are delinquent for more than 60 days to become special assessments against the respective parcels of land, resulting in liens on the property for the amount of the delinquent fee, plus administrative charges. ANALYSIS: Upon approval to schedule the public hearing, the public hearing notices will be mailed out to property owners with delinquent solid waste accounts that accrued from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Notices will be sent via first class mail no less than 10 days prior to the public hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: The delinquent accounts occurred well in advance of the current COVID-19 pandemic and represent charges incurred for actual refuse service that was provided. Failure to bring these accounts current, in addition to the revenue impacts from the current crisis, will have major ramifications for business continuity and City continuity of services which rely on these fees. Page 109 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director David F. Eoff IV, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR FY19/20 IN THE AMOUNT OF $223,235.00 FOR CONTRACT DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL PARK DOG PARK. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that City Council approve the appropriation of funds in the amount of $223,235.00 to account 1274401-5650/2022274-0 for contract design services for the Central Park Dog Park. BACKGROUND: In 2019, the City was awarded a grant in the amount of $3 million dollars from the State of California as part of the 2019-2020 State budget. The funding was specifically requested for the construction of the dog park project, due to the high interest it gained from the community during the Central Park Master Plan revisioning process. In addition to the Community's desire, the dog park is also one of the smaller segments within the master plan, and many of the dog park components will be useful for future improvements to Central Park. The State Department of Parks and Recreation and the Office of Grants and Local Services (OGALS) is responsible overseeing the grant administration. On October 2, 2019, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-086, approving the filing of all project applications associated with the specified grant funds and entering into a contract with the State Department of Parks and Recreation. A copy of the Resolution has been provided to OGALS for their records. The contract between the State and the City, as well as the grant's project application have also been provided to OGALS. ANALYSIS: At the time of the grant award and acceptance by City Council in 2019, the FY19/20 Capital Budget did not include funding for the dog park project. On March 18, 2020, the City Council approved a contract award to Community Works Design Group for design services in an amount not to exceed $223,235.00, however, the request to appropriate funds for the project in FY19/20 was not included. Community Works Design Group will be responsible for preparing full design drawings for the dog park, and full construction drawings that will be used for an ensuing RFP for construction services. The appropriation of funds into the FY19/20 Capital fund, account 1274401-5650/2022274-0, in the amount of $223,235.00 will allow Community Works Design Group to begin work on the project this fiscal year and will help the project remain on schedule. The State's grant performance period occurs from July 1, 2019 through June 30. 2022. The dog park project has a completion date to be operational by no later than December of 2021. The design and construction plans are anticipated to be complete by August/September of this year, with construction beginning thereafter Page 110 around December 2020/January 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The total up -front cost of the City for this contract with Community Works Design Group is in an amount not to exceed $223,235.00. Staff requests an appropriation of $223,235.00 to fund the contract for design services by Community Works Design Group. Once the project is complete (fully constructed) and accepted by OGALS, the City will request reimbursement for the overall cost of the dog park from the State through the specified grant funds. The reimbursement will offset the cost associated with consultant design services, construction and construction management services, among others, minimizing the fiscal impact to primarily staff time for project management and processing, and future maintenance for the dog park. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The appropriation of funding and the execution of the contract supports the Council's goal of contributing to active and healthy lifestyles and providing attractive community service facilities that adequately meet the community's needs. Page 111 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager Fabian Villenas, Principal Management Analyst Justine Garcia, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 968, AMENDMENT TO URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 967, EXTENDING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL TENANT EVICTIONS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council read by title only and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 968, "An Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Extending Emergency Regulations Related to Commercial Tenant Evictions and Declaring the Urgency Thereof." Adoption of the Urgency Ordinance will require a four-fifths vote for adoption where upon it will take effect immediately. BACKGROUND: In response to a global outbreak of a novel coronavirus, also known as COVID-19, city, county, state and federal officials have taken decisive actions in the last several weeks in order to minimize the spread of COVID-19. These actions include: • March 4, 2020: California Governor Newsom declared a state of emergency in order to address the spread of COVID-19. • March 12, 2020: San Bernardino County Health Officer temporarily prohibited large gatherings of 250 people or more. • March 13, 2020: United States President Trump declared a national emergency. • March 16, 2020: California Governor Newsom issued order N-28-20 allowing Cities to temporarily prohibit the evictions of both residential and commercial tenants. • March 18, 2020: Rancho Cucamonga City Council declared a local emergency by passing Resolution No. 2020-14 In order to minimize the spread of COVID-19, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health and the San Bernardino County Health Officer have all issued recommendations encouraging social distancing and avoiding public locations where exposure to COVID-19 may occur such as retail stores, restaurants, bars, theaters, and group events. As such, the economic impacts from COVID-19 are significant and threaten the housing security for many in California. Even further economic impacts are anticipated, leaving tenants vulnerable to eviction. Page 112 ANALYSIS: As the public is being asked to practice social distancing and urged to avoid public places in order to reduce the spread of COVID-19, this has presented financial hardships to both the City's business and residential communities. At the March 18, 2020 City Council Meeting, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga unanimously voted to approve Urgency Ordinance No. 967 which temporarily prohibits the eviction of residential tenants until May 31, 2020 and commercial tenants until April 30, 2020 due to financial hardship caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. At this same meeting, Council directed staff to bring Urgency Ordinance No. 967 back to the Council for re -valuation in relation to the timeframe of prohibition of eviction for commercial tenants. Since the adoption and implementation of the ordinance, there has been a positive reception from the business community and the general community overall. And while, a few commercial and residential landlords may not have been overly enthusiastic about the moratorium, there has been an overall sense of cooperation and understanding as the community navigates through these unprecedented times. As currently drafted, Urgency Ordinance No. 967 has temporary eviction restrictions for commercial tenants expiring on April 30, 2020 and for residential tenants expiring on May 31, 2020, or until the state of emergency is lifted, whichever date occurs first. Staff is recommending that the City Council extend the commercial tenant eviction restriction timeframe to May 31, 2020 or until the state of emergency is lifted, whichever date occurs first. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact should be positive for the City if the moratorium helps keep existing tenants and businesses in place through the current shutdown. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Ordinance No. 968 - Eviction Moratorium Commercial Extension Page 113 URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 968 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXTENDING EMERGENCY REGULATIONS RELATED TO COMMERCIAL TENANT EVICTIONS AND DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF Raritalc A. International, national, state, and local health and governmental authorities are responding to an outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus named "coronavirus disease 2019," abbreviated COVID-19, ("COVID-19"); and B. On March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California declared a state of emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the state prepare for broader spread of COVID-19; and C. On March 13, 2020, the President of the United States of America declared a national emergency and announced that the federal government would make emergency funding available to assist state and local governments in preventing the spread of and addressing the effects of COVID-19; and D. On March 17, 2020, the Health Officer of the County of San Bernardino adopted a public health order that places a prohibition on certain types of public gatherings until 11:59 p.m. on April 6, 2020; and E. On March 18, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-14 declaring the existence of a local emergency pursuant to Government Code Section 8630 to set forth applicable powers, functions and duties of the City's Disaster Council and Emergency Management Division, request the availability of mutual aid, and to ensure an effective response to COVID-19; and F. On March 19, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-33-20 to implement directives developed by the State Public Health Officer that require all individuals living in the State of California to stay at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure and other essential sectors. G. Based on the foregoing, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health, and the San Bernardino County Health Officer have all issued recommendations and/or orders including but not limited to social distancing, staying home if sick, canceling or postponing large group events, working from home, and other precautions to protect public health and prevent transmission of this communicable virus; and H. As a result of the public health emergency and the precautions required by health authorities, commercial tenants in Rancho Cucamonga have experienced or expect soon to experience sudden and unexpected revenue loss; and -1- 11231-0001\2407652v1. d oc Page 114 I. These public health orders impact daily life in the community as well as the economic health of City businesses; and J. Loss of revenue as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including the payment of rent; and K. On March 16, 2020, the Governor issued an executive order, pursuant to his emergency powers under Government Code Sections 8567 and 8571, that suspended any provision of state law that would preempt or otherwise restrict the City's exercise of its police power to impose substantive limitations on residential or commercial evictions based on nonpayment of rent arising out of a substantial decrease in household or business income caused by the COVID-19 pandemic; and L. On March 18, 2020, the City Council adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 967 to establish a temporary moratorium on evictions for non-payment of rent by residential or commercial tenants impacted by the COVID-19. The eviction moratorium applied to residential tenants until the earlier of the conclusion of the City's local emergency declared in response to COVID-19 or May 31, 2020. With respect to commercial tenants, the eviction moratorium applied until the earlier of the conclusion of the City's local emergency or April 30, 2020; and M. The City Council finds that the economic conditions affecting commercial tenants due to the COVID-19 have not improved. Further economic impacts are anticipated, leaving commercial tenants vulnerable to eviction. Commercial evictions can lead to storefront vacancies and cause blight; and N. In the interest of public peace, health, and safety, as affected by the emergency caused by the spread of COVID-19, it is necessary for the City Council to continue the commercial tenant eviction moratorium for the protection of the public peace health, and safety. II. Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Subsection A of Section 1 of Urgency Ordinance No. 967 is amended to read as follows: "A. Until the period of local emergency declared in response to COVID-19 is concluded, or until May 31, 2020, whichever date is sooner, no landlord shall endeavor to evict a residential or commercial tenant under the following circumstances:" SECTION 2. Section 3 of Urgency Ordinance No. 967 is amended to read as follows: "Term. This Urgency Ordinance shall remain in effect for the period of local emergency declared in response to COVID-19 within the City, or until May 31, 2020, whichever date is sooner." SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency ordinance for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety within the meaning of Government Code Section 36937(b), and therefore shall be passed immediately upon its -2- 11231-0001\2407652v1. d oc Page 115 introduction and shall become effective at midnight tonight, April 15, 2020, upon its adoption by a minimum 4/5 vote of the City Council. SECTION 4. Uncodified. This Urgency Ordinance shall not be codified. SECTION 5. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Urgency Ordinance for any reason be held invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Urgency Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Urgency Ordinance and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 6. Certification and Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Urgency Ordinance and shall cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Urgency Ordinance was passed, approved, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 15th day of April, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: -3- 11231-0001\2407652v1.doc City Clerk Page 116 �CA Eviction Moratorium CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA March 16, 2020: Executive Order N-28-20 March 1812020: Urgency Ordinance 967 Adopted March 27.,2020: Executive Order N-37-20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Urgency Ordinance 967 Adopted • Eviction Process cannot be initiated • Applies to nonpayment of rent because of COVID-19 • Decrease in household income due to layoffs or cut in work hours • Decrease in business income due to reduction in operating hours or consumer demand • Or substantial out-of-pocket medical expenses • Supporting documentation required • All unpaid rent is due within 6 months of local emergency expiration Urgency Ordinance 967 • Residential Moratorium in effect until May 31, 2020 • Commercial Moratorium in effect until April 30, 2020 • Council direction to bring back ordinance to consider extending Commercial Moratorium to May 3112020 • Extensive outreach to residents, businesses, and property owners Recommendation •Adopt attached Ordinance extending Commercial Moratorium to May 31, 2020 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager Sean McPherson, Senior Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF NOTICE TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REGARDING MICROENTERPRISE HOME KITCHEN OPERATIONS (MEHKOS). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council provide a notice of opposition to the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors as they consider authorization of Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations. BACKGROUND: A Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operation is defined as a food facility that is operated by a resident in a private home where food is stored, handled, prepared for, and may be served to customers. As a food facility, it is regulated by the health agency having jurisdiction which is the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health. Such operations were authorized in California effective January 1, 2019 under AB 626, amended in AB 377, and become effective in a jurisdiction when authorized by county ordinance or resolution. Some of the stated purposes of this legislation include supporting the "farm -to -table" movement which embraces locally produced foods; economic opportunities for those most needing it, including women, immigrants, and socially diadvantaged; the informal economy already exists without training or education in food safety; and providing healthy food options in areas with limited availability. The basic requirements for MEHKOs include: • There shall be no more than one full-time employee, in addition to family and household members; • Operators of a MEHKO shall have food certification and other individuals preparing food must have food handler cards; • Food that is prepared as part of the MEHKO shall be prepared, cooked and served on the same day; • The number of meals served by a MEHKO shall be limited to 30 meals per day or 60 per week; • Food may be consumed on-site, picked up, or delivered (limited to 6 diners at a time, direct sales only, and deliveries may only be made by an employee of the MEHKO); • The MEHKO shall not exceed more than $50,000 in gross annual sales; • Advertisements must include "Made in a Home Kitchen" statement, health permit number and identify the permitting agency. According to the state legislation, a MEHKO shall be considered a residence for the purposes of the Page 117 State Uniform Building Standards Code and local building and fire codes and shall not constitute a change of occupancy. As such, MEHKOs are exempt from certain state health and safety code regulations, including, but not limited to: • Dedicated handwashing facilities outside of a restroom; • Prohibitions on customers or unnecessary persons in the food preparation areas; • Requirements for ventilation; • Requirements for water, plumbing, drainage and waste; • Letter grade system; • Inspections are once per year by appointment only. The legislation specifically details that no city can prohibit the operation of, require a permit to operate, levy any fees or impose any restriction on a MEHKO. This includes requiring a Home Occupation Permit which is required of any other home-based business, including Cottage Foods. The only requirements listed are that the MEHKO post no outdoor signage and comply with local noise ordinances. Should the associated activity develop into nuisance conditions, such as parking, trash, noise or odors, the only recourse for enforcement would be through existing Municipal Codes which would be difficult to enforce on the customers of the business and there would be no ability of the City to place conditions or revoke a permit of the operator. On December 10, 2019, the County Board of Supervisors held a public meeting to consider whether the county should develop and consider an ordinance or resolution to authorize MEHKO operations. At that meeting, the Board of Supervisors acknowledged that AB 626 and AB 377 would provide economic benefit to certain individuals, however the Board also expressed concern that AB 626 and AB 377 effectively took decision making authority from local municipalities and placed it in the hands of the county. Further, certain supervisors also expressed concern over the relaxing of food safety regulations in order to accommodate MEHKOs and discussed whether the relaxation of safety standards unfairly benefitted MEHKOs over traditional brick and mortar restaurants. After hearing public testimony, both in support of and opposing MEHKOs, the Board of Supervisors voted 5-0 to direct County staff to conduct outreach in an attempt to gather input, concerns and questions from cities and residents throughout the County and return to the Board within 6 months. Therefore, it is currently anticipated that the Board of Supervisors will receive the report and consider this item in June 2020. ANALYSIS: While the primary intention of AB 626 and AB 377 is to provide broader economic opportunity for certain sectors of the population, staff has multiple concerns regarding the County's consideration of authorizing these operations. To date, Riverside County, Santa Barbara County and Solano County have authorized the activity and two counties, EI Dorado and Siskiyou, have specifically not authorized the activity. San Mateo County is conducting a two-year pilot study which has not started pending funding. In order to better understand the operations and potential impacts of MEHKOs, City staff reached out to various Riverside County cities, including Eastvale, Corona and Moreno Valley, within which the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health has approved 4, 5 and 9 MEHKOs, respectively. While none of these cities indicated that they had received any complaints from the operation of a MEHKO, each city also noted that they are not contacted directly by the County upon the approval of a MEHKO. In fact, in a couple of instances, city staff in these various cities seemed generally unaware that these MEHKOs were even operating within their cities. As of March 2020, Riverside County has approved 43 MEHKOs which are located in 18 different incorporated cities. Primarily, staff feels that the exemptions provided in AB 626 and AB 377 constitute the potential for health and safety risks to the public, notably as MEHKOs are not subject to the same rigorous set of safety standards and inspection requirements as traditional brick and mortar restaurants. Whereas a commercial restaurant is subject to unannounced inspections and the posting of letter grades for public safety, MEHKOs are only subject to scheduled annual inspections (unless a complaint is received) and Page 118 are not required to post letter grades. Further, certain provisions provided within the law intended to regulate MEHKOs appear difficult to enforce. For example, the law does not stipulate on how to enforce the rule requiring food to be consumed the same day it is cooked, or how the number of meals cooked daily or weekly will be regulated. Additionally, Department of Public Health (DPH) would be designated as the permitting authority for MEHKOs and the City would not be able to exercise any zoning review or permitting authority. For example, if the County were to opt into this legislation, the City could not require any discretionary authority, such as a Conditional Use Permit, in order to regulate MEHKOs. Also, it is not clear whether MEHKOs can be operated out of Accessory Dwelling Units. Therefore, it could be possible for there to exist two MEHKOs on the same property and the City would have no authority to prevent this. Upon approval of a MEHKO, it appears that County DPH would be under no legal obligation to inform the City of the approval of a MEHKO. Further, the law is unclear as to whether the city can require that a MEHKO operator obtain a business license. Referring to the Riverside County case study noted above, certain cities required business licenses, while other cities did not. As was presented by County staff on December 10, 2019, while County DPH would be the approving authority for San Bernardino County, individual cities would be expected to enforce local ordinances and respond to any violations which result from the operation of a MEHKO (noise, odors, traffic, etc.). AB 626 and AB 377 provides no funding mechanism and specifically prohibits fees or permits within the legislation which would offset the potential increased cost in enforcing regulations relating to MEHKOs or the nuisance activity which may result. Generally, staff feels that there are a variety of concerns with the implementation of AB 626 and AB 377 which require further study and consideration. Further, certain aspects of the law appear to be difficult to enforce and regulate. Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, all resources at County DPH are needed to respond to the virus, and trying to take on a new program, ill conceived and unclear in scope, with limited resources would strain a department already struggling to handle its current workload. Further, the restaurant industry in Rancho Cucamonga has been devastated by the business closures. Our brick and mortar locations will struggle to reopen and regain the lost business revenue from the closure. Increasing competition with MEHKO's would in many cases be the final nail that drives many of these restaurants under, increasing unemployment and businesses vacancies and decreasing much needed sales tax revenue for the City. In summary, while there may be benefits to certain sectors of the population, the broad application of these rules as required by the MEHKO legislation neglects the wide variety of the goals and objectives of the many diverse cities throughout the County. Therefore, in order to maintain the highest standards of health, safety and welfare for Rancho Cucamonga residents, City staff recommends that the City Council approve and provide a notice of opposition to the County Board of Supervisors urging that body to not adopt an ordinance or resolution permitting these operations in San Bernardino County. FISCAL IMPACT: None noted. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Letter of Opposition - Draft Page 119 Mayor L. Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Council Members Ryan A. Hutchison, Kristine D. Scott, Sam Spagnolo City Manager John R. Gillison 10500 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1909.477.2700 1 www.CityofRC.us April 15, 2020 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of San Bernardino 385 North Arrowhead Avenue, #2 San Bernardino, CA 92415 RE: AB 626 and AB 377 Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MEHKOs). Notice of Opposition Dear Members of the Board of Supervisors, The City of Rancho Cucamonga OPPOSES any consideration by the Board of Supervisors to authorize Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MEHKOs) within San Bernardino County in accordance with Assembly Bills 626 and 377. Primarily, AB 626 and AB 377 allow numerous exemptions to the California Retail Food Code (CRFC) which could pose health and safety risks to the community. These exemptions include allowing unnecessary people in food preparation areas, the use of wood surfaces for food preparation and no additional ventilation or plumbing. Inspection of MEHKO facilities is limited to one scheduled inspection per year and no letter grade is issued to inform the public, whereas traditional commercial restaurants are subject to risk inspections and letter grades. While the County Department of Public Health, Environmental Health Services (EHS) Division would be the permitting authority, this legislation prohibits the City from further exercising its local land use authority as the law prevents local jurisdictions from implementing local zoning standards, even preventing the City from requiring permit reviews and inspections. There is no mechanism for the City to mitigate the potential negative impacts of parking, traffic, and commercial use in residential neighborhoods in order to preserve the quality of life for neighboring residents. A decision by the Board to authorize these operations would mandate a "one size fits all" approach to a very diverse County. While Rancho Cucamonga acknowledges this program may provide benefits to certain sectors of the population, including home-based entrepreneurs or rural residents, the countywide application of MEHKO legislation could result in adverse impacts which negates the variety of goals and objectives representative of our many diverse communities, including Rancho Cucamonga. Lastly, a timely consideration is the effects of the current COVID-19 pandemic. So much remains unknown of the virus, transmission, and longevity. The full impacts on the Department of Public Health, the restaurant industry and society as a whole are impossible to quantify or predict as we navigate this unprecedented circumstance. As we experience mandated isolation from others, it seems counterproductive to authorize a program which promotes personal interaction in the intimate setting of a home kitchen. For these reasons, the City of Rancho Cucamonga respectfully opposes any ordinance or resolution authorizing Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations as defined in AB 626 and AB 377. Respectfully, L. Dennis Michael Mayor Page 120 Microenterprise Home Kitchen Operations (MEHKOs) AB 626 & AB 377 Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Authorization • San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors(BOS) considering authorization as local health agency • Presentation from Department of Public Health (DPH) to the Board in December 2019 • DPH advised to seek feedback from stakeholders and report back Purpose • "Farm -to -table" movement embracing locally produced foods • Economic opportunities for those most needing it, including women, immigrants and people of color • Informal economy already exists without training and education • Healthy food options in areas with limited options AB 626 & AB 377 — Microenterprise Home Kitchens (MEHKOs) • Defined as a food facility that is operated by a resident in a private home where food is stored, handled, prepared for, and may be served to customers. 1 i • Effective January 1, 2019, AB 626 allows the operation of MEHKOs if authorized by county ordinance or resolution. • AB 377 is a clean up bill for AB 626 which took immediate effect on October 71, 2019 and clarified that an authorization (opt -in) by the County automatically opts -in ALL cities within the County. Basic MEHKO Requirements • Food facility operated by a resident in a private =• homeServSafe CERTIFICATION • No more than one full-time employee in addition to family and household members • Operator must have food safety certification and other individuals preparing food must have food handler cards • Food is prepared, cooked and served on the same day • Limited to 30 meals or equivalent components per day or 60 per week 5tateFoodSafety up Certificate of Training Jane Dae County of San Bernardino Fvvd FlandlersTraining u�.•�it^. o,.a,-moo <.�w.w�wi.. new a� o•. o+ub� rte. �ryr Wmer��erywrry CUuhYI'r n,;.,. MA Basic MEHKO Requirements • Food can be consumed on site, picked up or delivered • Direct Sales only • Limited to 6 diners • Delivery only by employee • No more than $50,000 in gross annual sales • Advertisements must include "Made in a Home Kitchen" statement, health permit number, and permitting agency • Shall not include catering or any variation of the word Permitting and Inspections • A MEHKO must apply for a health permit and pass an initial inspection to open for business • Inspection limited to once per year, unless based on a complaint • All inspections are by appointment Health and Safety Code Exemptions • Multiple exemptions from the California Retail Food Code (CA Health and Safety Code) • Letter Grade Card and posting • Handwashing facility requirements • Certain equipment and sanitation requirements R Building and Safety Exemptions • A MEHKO is exempt from many requirements that traditional restaurants must meet: • Exhaust hood ventilation requirements • Plan review process • Water, plumbing, drainage, and waste requirements Zoning and Nuisance • Considered a residence for all building and fire codes • Not considered a change in occupancy • MEHKO permitted in residential dwelling when: • No outdoor display or signs • In compliance with local noise ordinance Zoning and Nuisance • The City cannot impose zoning restrictions on a MEHKO, including zoning permit or fees • Home Occupation Permit • Local authority to enforce on nuisances • Odors • Traffic interference • Parking • Excessive noise ZONING Potential Impacts • Health &Safety • Exemptions for food safety • Scheduled annual inspection • No letter grade display • Definitions • Meal and meal components • "Same day" preparation Potential Impacts • Countywide application • No local discretion • No additional permitting • Home Occupation Permit • Conditional Use Permit • No zoning authority • Accessory Dwelling Unit • Neighborhood impacts Potential Impacts • Permits • Fees and permits prohibited • Potential enforcement costs • Enforcement • County enforcement • City limited to associated nuisance activity Potential Impacts • COVID-19 Pandemic • Unknown transmission and longevity of the virus • Social distancing • Private home interaction • Dept. of Public Health PRO T I P YOU SHOULD WASH �r YOUR HANDS EVEN WHEN THERE ISNT A AU V IRUS PANIC GLOB�. . Staff Recommendation • Council review and approve a letter to the San Bernardino County Board of Supervisors stating formal opposition to approving and adopting regulations permitting Micro Enterprise Home Kitchen Operations in San Bernardino County Questions? DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Hannah Mac Kenzie, Economic Development Management Aide Anne McIntosh, Planning Director SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG), 2020-2024 CONSOLIDATED PLAN, 2020-2021 ACTION PLAN AND 2020-2024 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing to receive comments on the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice; 2. Amend the 2020-2021 Action Plan to: a. Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Senior Activities public service program in the amount of $14,000; b. Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sidewalk Grinding project in the amount of $45,700; c. Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Graffiti Removal project in the amount of $15,000; d. Modify the funding for the Pecan Avenue Street Improvements project to reflect a total of $800,000 ; 3. Consider and approve the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan, and 2020- 2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the City of Rancho Cucamonga Community Development Block Grant program, finding the approval of these documents exempt from the National Environmental Policy Act and California Environmental Quality Act, and authorizing the City Manager to: a. Submit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan, and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); b. Execute the 2020-2021 CDBG Program Grant Agreement and all related documents on behalf of the City. c. Execute subrecipient agreements with the non-profit organizations receiving allocations of CDBG funds in the Action Plan; and authorize the Planning Director, or his/her designee to be the official representative of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to submit required environmental documentation for CDBG projects. BACKGROUND: As an "Entitlement Grantee," the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) receives an annual allocation of federal funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) through its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Program. Entitlement Grantees use CDBG Page 121 funds to develop local programs geared towards low- and moderate -income households in areas such as affordable housing, public services, and infrastructure improvements. Traditionally, the City uses its CDBG Entitlement to assist local non -profits, housing programs, infrastructure, and City activities that comply with HUD's national objectives to provide adequate housing, safe living environments, and the expansion of economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income individuals. The City is required to submit a 5 -year Consolidated Plan that outlines Rancho Cucamonga's overall housing and community development needs and provides a strategy to address those needs within each 5 -year period. Each year the City is required to submit an Annual Action Plan to outline proposed activities for each year's allocation of CDBG grant funding. The Annual Action Plan is due to HUD by May 15th of each year. The Annual Action Plan summarizes the projects that will be undertaken with CDBG resources for the forthcoming program year. For the 2020-2021 Program Year, HUD has allocated Rancho Cucamonga $1,028,131. In addition, $870,995 prior year carryover funds will be allocated to projects in the upcoming program year. Carryover funds are CDBG proceeds that were previously allocated to approved projects but were not spent because those projects were completed below their estimated cost. HUD allows carryover funds to be reallocated from one year to the next for other eligible and approved projects. The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) is a five-year planning document that identifies impediments to fair housing, which are conditions in which individuals of similar income levels in the same housing market may have their housing choice impeded as a result of protected class status or identification. ANALYSIS: According to HUD regulations, the City must submit a 5 -year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan at least 45 days prior to the beginning of the program year. The City of Rancho Cucamonga operates on a fiscal year from July 1 st through June 30th. On March 13, 2020, staff published a notice in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin informing the general public that the City of Rancho Cucamonga had prepared the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, Draft 2020-2021 Action Plan and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice and that such would be available for review and comment until April 15, 2020. The public was provided an opportunity to provide oral and/or written comments on the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, Draft 2020-2021 Action Plan, and Draft 2020- 2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. To date, no public comments have been received. Additionally, the current effective Citizen Participation Plan requires that a public hearing be held to receive testimony from interested residents or parties regarding the Action Plan. Tonight's public hearing fulfills the requirements for the public hearing. This year, the City was required to prepare these plans using the standardized template in HUD's eCon Planning Suite system. While these are separate reports, under this new mandatory system, the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020-2021 Action Plan have been merged into one document. Future annual Action Plans will be stand-alone reports that tie back to the 5 -Year Consolidated Plan. As part of the public outreach required by HUD, staff conducted two community meetings and made community surveys available to identify the community's priorities for the CDBG program. Based on this outreach and data evaluated in the preparation of the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the following priorities are established within the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan that will serve as the basis for CDBG program funding decisions over the next five years: • Preserve the supply of affordable housing; • Equal access to housing opportunities; • Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents; • Improve public facilities and infrastructure; and • Address material and architectural barriers to accessibility for elderly persons and severely Page 122 disabled adults On January 10, 2020, the City published a Notice of Funding Availability in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper to announce the availability of CDBG funds and solicit proposals from tax-exempt nonprofit organizations that provide eligible CDBG services or projects that benefit Rancho Cucamonga residents. The City also made the application available on the City's website and mailed notices to agencies who received funds in the current Fiscal Year and other agencies who had expressed interest. In response to the NOFA, five (5) nonprofit organizations submitted applications for CDBG grants requesting a total of $75,000. In consideration of HUD limitations on the use of CDBG funds for Administration (20 percent of the grant) and Public Service (15 percent of the grant) and given the level of funding available, the amount of funding requested, past performance and proposed accomplishments, anticipated benefit to Rancho Cucamonga residents, and City priorities, staff recommends program/project funding levels as follows: 2020-2021 Public Service Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Bringing Health Home $17,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: CASA $12,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Food Bank $15,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Senior Activities $12,500 YMCA: Senior Transportation $20,000 House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection $10,000 Family Service Association: Senior Nutrition $15,000 Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk $7,500 Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Program $7,500 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization $15,000 Sub -Total: $131,500 2020-2021 Capital Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Home Improvements Program City of Rancho Cucamonga: School Crosswalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pecan Ave Street Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Whittram Street Improvements $400,000 $83,500 $2,800 $800,000 $15,000 $200,000 Page 123 Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome Indicator 1. Fair Housing Affordable Equal access to 2,000 people Services Housing housing opportunities 2. Public Services Non -Housing • Public services for 5,000 people Community low- and moderate - Development income residents 3. Affordable Housing Affordable • Preserve the supply 100 owner housing Preservation Housing of affordable housing units 4. Public Facilities Non -Housing • Improve public 15 public facilities and Infrastructure Community facilities and 25,000 people Improvements Development infrastructure • Address barriers to accessibility On January 10, 2020, the City published a Notice of Funding Availability in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper to announce the availability of CDBG funds and solicit proposals from tax-exempt nonprofit organizations that provide eligible CDBG services or projects that benefit Rancho Cucamonga residents. The City also made the application available on the City's website and mailed notices to agencies who received funds in the current Fiscal Year and other agencies who had expressed interest. In response to the NOFA, five (5) nonprofit organizations submitted applications for CDBG grants requesting a total of $75,000. In consideration of HUD limitations on the use of CDBG funds for Administration (20 percent of the grant) and Public Service (15 percent of the grant) and given the level of funding available, the amount of funding requested, past performance and proposed accomplishments, anticipated benefit to Rancho Cucamonga residents, and City priorities, staff recommends program/project funding levels as follows: 2020-2021 Public Service Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Bringing Health Home $17,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: CASA $12,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Food Bank $15,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Senior Activities $12,500 YMCA: Senior Transportation $20,000 House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection $10,000 Family Service Association: Senior Nutrition $15,000 Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk $7,500 Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Program $7,500 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization $15,000 Sub -Total: $131,500 2020-2021 Capital Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Home Improvements Program City of Rancho Cucamonga: School Crosswalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pecan Ave Street Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Whittram Street Improvements $400,000 $83,500 $2,800 $800,000 $15,000 $200,000 Page 123 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Sidewalk Grinding $45,700 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Graffiti Removal $15,000 Sub -Total: $1,562,000 2020-2021 Program Administration Activities CDBG Program Administration $185,626 Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board: Fair Housing Services $20,000 Sub -Total: $205,626 TOTAL 2020-2021 CDBG PROGRAM $1,899,126 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund related to this item. This item provides for City Council approval of the use of CDBG funds for the 2020-2021 program year. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice identify housing and community development needs and establishes the foundation for projects and programs that will enhance the City's premier community status. ATTACHMENTS: Description 2020-24 ConPlan and 20-21 Annual Action Plan Page 124 This page intentionally left blank 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 126 Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary.....................................................................................................................................................................................1 ES -05 Executive Summary — 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)........................................................................................1 TheProcess.....................................................................................................................................................................................................6 PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b)..............................................................................................................6 PR -10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I)..........................................................................................................7 PR -15 Citizen Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c)............................................................................................15 NeedsAssessment...................................................................................................................................................................................24 NA -05 Overview.................................................................................................................................................................................24 NA -10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.405, 24 CFR 91.205(a,b,c)............................................29 NA -15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems - 91.405, 91.205 (b)(2) ........................41 NA -20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems - 91.405, 91.205 (b)(2).......45 NA -25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens - 91.405, 91.205 (b)(2) ..............49 NA -30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion - 91.205(b)(2)............................................................51 NA -35 Public Housing - 91.405, 91.205(b)......................................................................................................................57 NA -40 Homeless Needs Assessment - 91.405, 91.205(c).....................................................................................61 NA -45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.405, 91.205(b,d)....................................................68 NA -50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs - 91.415, 91.215 (0 ............................................72 HousingMarket Analysis.......................................................................................................................................................................76 MA -05 Overview.................................................................................................................................................................................76 MA -45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets - 91.410, 91.210(0 ..............................................78 MA -50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion................................................................................................................85 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 127 MA -60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households - 91.210(a)(4), 91.310(a)(2).............................................................................................................................................................87 MA -65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3)..............................................................................................89 StrategicPlan................................................................................................................................................................................................90 SP -05 Overview....................................................................................................................................................................................90 SP -10 Geographic Priorities - 91.415, 91.215(a)(1)......................................................................................................92 SP -25 Priority Needs - 91.415, 91.215(a)(2).....................................................................................................................94 SP -35 Anticipated Resources - 91.420(b), 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2)..........................................................98 SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure - 91.415, 91.215(k)....................................................................................101 SP -45 Goals - 91.415, 91.215(a)(4)......................................................................................................................................104 SP -65 Lead-based Paint Hazards - 91.415, 91.215(i)................................................................................................106 SP -70 Anti -Poverty Strategy - 91.415, 91.2150)..........................................................................................................108 SP -80 Monitoring - 91.230.........................................................................................................................................................110 ExpectedResources.............................................................................................................................................................................112 AP -15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2).... ...112 AnnualGoals and Objectives.........................................................................................................................................................115 AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e)......................................................................115 AP -35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d)......................................................................................................................................117 AP -38 Project Summary..............................................................................................................................................................118 AP -50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f)..................................................................................................121 AP -55 Affordable Housing - 91.420, 91.220(g)............................................................................................................122 AP -60 Public Housing - 91.420, 91.220(h)......................................................................................................................124 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 128 AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.420, 91.220(i)...................................................126 AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing - 91.420, 91.220(j)......................................................................................128 AP -85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k)........................................................................................................................129 AP -90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(I)(1,2,4)....................................................................132 Consolidated Plan and Action Plan Tables Table1 - Strategic Plan Summary.....................................................................................................................................................4 Table2 - Responsible Agencies.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Table 3 - Agencies, groups, organizations who participated.........................................................................................13 Table 4 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts..............................................................................................14 Table 5 - Citizen Participation Outreach...................................................................................................................................23 Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics......................................................................................................30 Table7 - Total Households Table.................................................................................................................................................30 Table8 - Housing Problems Table................................................................................................................................................32 Table9 - Housing Problems 2..........................................................................................................................................................32 Table10 - Cost Burden > 30%.......................................................................................................................................................33 Table11 - Cost Burden > 50%.......................................................................................................................................................33 Table12 - Crowding Information 1/2.........................................................................................................................................35 Table13 - Crowding Information 2/2.........................................................................................................................................36 Table 14 — Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI...........................................................................................................................42 Table 15 — Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI........................................................................................................................42 Table 16 — Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI........................................................................................................................43 Table 17 — Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI.....................................................................................................................43 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 129 Table 18 - Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI............................................................................................................46 Table 19 - Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI.........................................................................................................46 Table 20 - Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI.........................................................................................................47 Table 21 — Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI.....................................................................................................47 Table 22 — Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI..................................................................................................49 Table23 - Public Housing by Program Type..........................................................................................................................57 Table 24 — Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type.........................................................58 Table 25 Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type...............................................................................58 Table 26 — Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type.......................................................................59 Table 27 - Homeless Needs Assessment..................................................................................................................................63 Table28 - Point -in -Time Counts 2017-2019.........................................................................................................................64 Table 29 - San Bernardino Homeless Population Race/Ethnicity...............................................................................65 Table30 - Business Activity................................................................................................................................................................79 Table31 - Labor Force.........................................................................................................................................................................79 Table32 Occupations by Sector................................................................................................................................................79 Table33 - Travel Time..........................................................................................................................................................................79 Table 34 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status...........................................................................................80 Table 35 - Educational Attainment by Age..............................................................................................................................80 Table 36 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months............................................................................................................80 Table37 - Strategic Plan Summary................................................................................................................................................91 Table38 - Geographic Priority Areas..........................................................................................................................................92 Table39 - Priority Needs Summary.............................................................................................................................................97 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 130 Table40 - Anticipated Resources..................................................................................................................................................98 Table 41 - Institutional Delivery Structure.............................................................................................................................101 Table 42 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary.......................................................................................................102 Table43 - Goals Summary ..............................................................................................................................................................104 Table 44 - Expected Resources — Priority Table...............................................................................................................112 Table45 — Goals Summary .............................................................................................................................................................115 Table46 — Project Information.....................................................................................................................................................117 Table47 - Geographic Distribution...........................................................................................................................................121 Table 48 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement............................................123 Table 49 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type..............................................................123 Consolidated Plan and Action Plan Figures Figure 1 - Need for Improved Housing Facilities.. 25 Figure 2 - Need for Improved or Additional Housing Services...................................................................................25 Figure 3 - Need for Improved or Additional community Services by Type or Target Population ...... 26 Figure 4 - Need for Improved or Additional Services for Special Needs Populations.................................26 Figure 5 - Need for Improved or Additional Neighborhood Services...................................................................27 Figure 6 - Need for Improved or Additional Community Facilities..........................................................................27 Figure 7 - Need for Infrastructure Improvements...............................................................................................................28 Figure 8 - Need for Improved or Additional Business and jobs Services.............................................................28 Figure 9 - Extremely Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden......................................................... 34 Figure 10 - Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden...............................................................................34 Figure 11 - Moderate -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden...................................................................35 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 131 Figure 12 - White alone (not Hispanic)......................................................................................................................................53 Figure13 - Black / African American............................................................................................................................................53 Figure14 - Asian........................................................................................................................................................................................54 Figure 15 - American Indian / Alaska Native...........................................................................................................................54 Figure 16 - Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander.........................................................................................................................55 Figure17 - Two or more races.......................................................................................................................................................55 Figure18 - Some other race.............................................................................................................................................................56 Figure19 - Hispanic.................................................................................................................................................................................56 Figure 20 - Changes in Homeless Rates in California Counties, 2017 and 2019 ...........................................64 Figure 21 - Need for Additional or Improved Community Facilities.......................................................................73 Figure 22 - Need for Infrastructure Improvements............................................................................................................74 Figure 23 - Need for Community Services by type or Target Population..........................................................75 Figure 24 - Need for Services for Special Needs Populations.....................................................................................75 Figure 25 - Number of Residential Broadband Providers...............................................................................................87 Figure 26 - CDBG Low -Mod Census Block Groups........................................................................................................93 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Table of Contents Page 132 Executive Summary ES -05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction Since its incorporation in 1977, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has grown from a small community of people to become a vibrant, safe, business -friendly City of over 175,000 residents. Rancho Cucamonga is comprised of 40.2 square miles of master -planned neighborhoods, fine schools, world- class dining, shopping and recreation experiences, as well as cutting-edge workplaces. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has prepared the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan (Plan) as required to receive Federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City's housing and community development needs and outlines the City's priorities, objectives and strategies for the investment of CDBG funds to address these needs over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2025. The City receives CDBG funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn, awards grants and loans to nonprofit, for-profit, or public organizations for programs and projects in furtherance of this Plan. The CDBG program provides for a wide range of eligible activities for the benefit of low - and moderate -income Rancho Cucamonga residents, as discussed below. Rancho Cucamonga is a member of the San Bernardino HOME consortium. The HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) is an additional HUD formula grant that provides funding to support the acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of affordable rental and homeownership housing. The County administers the program and oversees HOME activities and programs that occur in Rancho Cucamonga. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan and the City's performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income persons. The CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the following national objectives: • Benefit low- and moderate -income persons; or • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency (usually the result of a natural disaster). 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 1 Page 133 For the 2020-2021 program year, the City will receive $1,028,131 of CDBG funds. When combined with available prior year resources, the 2020-2021 Action Plan allocates $1,429,536 of CDBG funds to the following program activities to be implemented from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. 2020-2021 Public Service Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Bringing Health Home $17,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: CASA $12,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Food Bank $15,000 YMCA: Senior Transportation $20,000 House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection $10,000 Family Service Association: Senior Nutrition $15,000 Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk $7,500 Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Program $7,500 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization $15,000 Sub -Total: $119,000 2020-2021 Capital Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Home Improvements Program $400,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: School Crosswalk Improvements $83,500 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements $2,800 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pecan Ave Street Improvements $403,610 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements $15,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Whittram Street Improvements $200,000 Sub -Total: $1,104,910 2020-2021 Program Administration Activities CDBG Program Administration $185,626 Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board: Fair Housing Services $20,000 Sub -Total: $205,626 TOTAL 2020-2021 CDBG PROGRAM $1,429,536 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 2 Page 134 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview The priority needs and goals identified in the strategic plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey of residents and stakeholders and the housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite). Data supplied by HUD includes the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same time period. Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to children, families, elderly persons, and persons with special needs throughout the community. In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed below are established as part of this Plan: • Preserve the supply of affordable housing • Equal access to housing opportunities • Public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Improve public facilities and infrastructure • Address material and architectural barriers to accessibility for elderly persons and severely disabled adults Consistent with HUD's national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG funded activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the Strategic Plan section of this Plan: .Akal o Name egory Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome ML Indicator 1. Fair Housing Affordable • Equal access to 2,000 people Services Housing housing opportunities 2. Public Services Non -Housing • Public services for 5,000 people Community low- and moderate - Development income residents 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 3 Page 135 Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary 3. Evaluation of past performance The investment of HUD resources during the 2015-2019 program years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Rancho Cucamonga residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its partners to: • Preserve and improve the existing housing stock and ensure equal access through rehabilitation of owner -occupied housing units; • Provide fair housing services to residents; • Provide healthy meals to residents; • Provide transportation services to seniors; and • Provide homelessness prevention and assistance services to residents. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness, Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families, homeless individuals and families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. This qualitative input was combined with a quantitative analysis of demographic, housing and socioeconomic data to develop the strategic plan that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Rancho Cucamonga over the next five years. In accordance with the City's Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders were able to participate in the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan through surveys, community 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 4 Page 136 Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome Indicator 3. Affordable Affordable • Preserve the supply 100 owner housing Housing Housing of affordable housing units Preservation 4. Public Facilities and Non -Housing • Improve public 15 public facilities Infrastructure Community facilities and Improvements Development infrastructure 25,000 people • Address barriers to accessibility Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary 3. Evaluation of past performance The investment of HUD resources during the 2015-2019 program years resulted in measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Rancho Cucamonga residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City of Rancho Cucamonga and its partners to: • Preserve and improve the existing housing stock and ensure equal access through rehabilitation of owner -occupied housing units; • Provide fair housing services to residents; • Provide healthy meals to residents; • Provide transportation services to seniors; and • Provide homelessness prevention and assistance services to residents. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC) to address homelessness, Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families, homeless individuals and families, youth and/or other persons with special needs. This qualitative input was combined with a quantitative analysis of demographic, housing and socioeconomic data to develop the strategic plan that reflects the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City of Rancho Cucamonga over the next five years. In accordance with the City's Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders were able to participate in the development of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan through surveys, community 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 4 Page 136 meetings and public hearings. Efforts were made to encourage participation by low- and moderate - income persons, particularly those living in areas where HUD funds are proposed to be used, and by residents of predominantly low- and moderate -income neighborhoods. Efforts were made to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data, and assisted the City to ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid duplication of effort. 5. Summary of public comments Community meetings to discuss housing and community development needs in Rancho Cucamonga were held on September 19, 2019 at Central Park and on October 19, 2019 at the RC Family Resource Center. A public hearing to receive comments on the housing and community development needs in the community was held before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on September 18, 2019. No public comments were received. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them All comments and views received by the City in the development of the Consolidated Plan were accepted and taken into consideration in the development of the Consolidated Plan. 7. Summary Examination of HUD -provided 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the 2011-2015 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, in addition to local data, as well as consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed five high priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $5.1 million of CDBG funds over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of CDBG funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by the five goals of the Strategic Plan. Projects in the Action Plan conform with one of the five Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action -oriented, measurable goals in order to receive consideration for CDBG funds. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Executive Summary 5 Page 137 The Process PR -05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. I CDBG Administrator I RANCHO CUCAMONGA I Planning Department I Table 2 - Responsible Agencies Narrative The City of Rancho Cucamonga's Planning Department is the lead agency responsible for the administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with MDG Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. In the development of this Consolidated Plan, MDG Associates, Inc. developed and implemented a comprehensive citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment and market analysis to identify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing, homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information was gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and housing market analysis. In the implementation of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans, the Planning Department shall be responsible for all grants planning, management and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 774-4313 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process r Page 138 PR -10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(1) 1. Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga consulted with representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the preservation of affordable housing and the provision of services to low - and moderate -income residents, including but not limited to children, elderly persons, persons with disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. To facilitate the consultation process, the City solicited feedback through the following methods: • Survey of residents and stakeholders (web -based and paper -surveys) • Individual stakeholder consultations • Community meetings • Public hearings • Receipt of written comments To gather the greatest breadth and depth of information, the City consulted with a wide variety of agencies, groups and organizations concerning the housing, community and economic development needs of the community. Each of the agencies, groups or organizations invited to consult and participate in the planning process is represented in Table 3. The input received from these consultations helped establish and inform the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)). The City recognizes the importance of careful coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG programs. As a result, during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted with organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community -focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys, invitations to community meetings, and follow-up in-person interviews where appropriate. The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the upcoming five-year planning period with these organizations and agencies. The City will reinforce these partnerships through the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds each year and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 7 Page 139 Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness San Bernardino County's homeless Continuum of Care (CoC) is comprised of a network of public, private, faith -based, for-profit, and non-profit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources to provide services for homeless people. The region's municipalities, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga, also provide resources for services that assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. The non-profit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless families with children, and single men and women. The non-profit and faith - based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, the disabled and youth. The CoC guides the development of homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness throughout the region. The City provided a detailed questionnaire to the CoC to identify the CoC's perceived needs in the county and its objectives to address the needs of different homeless persons populations, specifically chronically homeless families and individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth and persons at risk of homelessness. Following the delivery and response to this questionnaire, the City followed up with the CoC to clarify existing needs and objectives and understand opportunities for collaboration and coordination during the five-year planning process. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not receive ESG funds. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process I Page 140 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities 1 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Housing Authority Agency/Group/Organization Type Public Housing Authority What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Public Housing How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted via and what are the anticipated outcomes of the personal call, emails outreach, data consultation or areas for improved coordination? validation and the web -based survey. 2 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board (IFHMB) Agency/Group/Organization Type Service — Fair Housing Services - Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 3 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health Agency/Group/Organization Type Publicly funded institution / System of care What section of the Plan was addressed by Public Health Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 4 Agency/Group/Organization YMCA Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children Services - Seniors 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process Page 141 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 10 Page 142 What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 5 Agency/Group/Organization House of Ruth Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Victims of Domestic Violence What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 6 Agency/Group/Organization Family Service Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Health Services - Seniors What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 7 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill Family Shelter Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Homeless Services - Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs — Families with Consultation? Children Homeless Needs — Chronically Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 8 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Valley Hope Partners (SOVA) Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless Needs — Families with Children (at risk of homelessness) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 10 Page 142 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process Page 143 What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 9 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Regional Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill AIDS Project Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Persons with HIV/AIDS What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 11 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Strategy Consultation? Homeless Needs — Chronically Homeless Homeless Needs — Families with Children Homeless Needs — Veterans Homeless Needs — Unaccompanied youth How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 12 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Agency/Group/Organization Type Business and Civic Leaders 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process Page 143 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 12 Page 144 What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 13 Agency/Group/Organization Chaffey College Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Education Services - Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 14 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Cucamonga City Manager's Office Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach, the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey and the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). 15 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Cucamonga Unified School District Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Children Services — Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 16 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Empire Economic Partnership (ZEEP) Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Employment Regional Organization 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 12 Page 144 Table 3 - Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG programs and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend the community meetings and participate in surveys. Any agency or organization that was not consulted and would like to be included in the City's list of stakeholders, the agency or organization may contact the Planning Department at 909-477-2750. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 13 Page 145 What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Housing Community Consultation? Development Economic Development How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. 17 Agency/Group/Organization San Bernardino County Workforce Investment Board Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Employment What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization consulted The organization was consulted by and what are the anticipated outcomes of the email outreach and the web -based consultation or areas for improved coordination? survey. Table 3 - Agencies, groups, organizations who participated Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG programs and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend the community meetings and participate in surveys. Any agency or organization that was not consulted and would like to be included in the City's list of stakeholders, the agency or organization may contact the Planning Department at 909-477-2750. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 13 Page 145 Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan rName. .. Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overla] with - goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Housing Authority of Consultation with HACSB indicates the City's the County of San public service strategy in this Consolidated Plan is Bernardino (HACSB) consistent with the CoC's strategies. City of Rancho City of Rancho Strategic Plan goals are consistent with Housing Cucamonga 2014- Cucamonga Element policies and goals. 2021 Housing Element San Bernardino San Bernardino Coordination with the San Bernardino County County HOME County Community Development and Housing Consortium Department shows this Consolidated Plan is consistent with the HOME consortium's strategies and goals. Table 4 - Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)) To enhance coordination among the CoC, public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies, the City invited each of these entities to provide input on the needs of the community in the development of this Consolidated Plan. The Planning Department works with subrecipients of CDBG funds to ensure a coordinated effort among service agencies in the region to address the needs of Rancho Cucamonga residents, including but not limited to chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, unaccompanied youth, and persons who were recently homeless but now live in permanent housing. To promote economic opportunities for low-income residents, the City coordinates with subrecipient social service agencies, businesses and housing developers to ensure that where there are job opportunities for low-income people in connection with HUD -assisted projects, information is disseminated through appropriate channels consistent with the objectives of Section 3 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1968. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 14 Page 146 PR -15 Citizen Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal -setting The City established and followed a process for the development of this Consolidated Plan that included broad participation from the community. These activities were coordinated and implemented by the Planning Department. To assist in the identification of priority needs in the City, a survey was prepared and distributed to residents and stakeholders to obtain information necessary to identify needs, prioritize needs, and develop strategies to address community services, community facilities, infrastructure, neighborhood services, special needs services, businesses and jobs, and housing. The surveys were available online and were made available in paper format at various public facilities. Community meetings to discuss the housing and community development needs in Rancho Cucamonga were held on September 19, 2019 and October 19, 2019. Residents in attendance received a presentation on the Consolidated Plan and discussed housing and community development needs with the Planning Department Staff. Two public hearings were held at different stages in the development of the Consolidated Plan. The first public hearing before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on September 18, 2019 focused on the housing and community development needs in the community and potential strategies and activities to address those needs. The second public hearing will be held on April 15, 2020 before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council to receive comments on the draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan. At each step in the process, the City ensured that low- and moderate -income residents, members of minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations, and others who are directly impacted by the programs and activities supported by the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. In the preparation of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the City followed the process established for citizen participation set forth in the Citizen Participation Plan. To promote greater public accessibility to program documents, the Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plans, CAPERs and the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice are posted on the City website. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 15 Page 147 Citizen Participation Outreach S Sor-t rdell Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach 1pesponse/atte Summary of n dance Summary of Comment received Summary • comments not accepted and reasons URL (If applicable) 1 Newspaper Non- Newspaper ad No comments were No comments Not applicable. Ad targeted/broad published on August received. were received. community 16, 2019 in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin announcing the availability of the draft Citizen Participation Plan for a 30 -day public review and comment period to include a public hearing before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on September 18, 2019. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 16 Page 148 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 17 Page 149 l`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde F utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 2 Public Minorities A public hearing was No comments were No comments Not applicable. Hearing held before the Rancho received. were received. Non-English Cucamonga City Speaking - Council on September Specify other 18, 2019 to receive language: Any input on the highest other language priority housing, community and Persons with economic development disabilities needs in Rancho Cucamonga as well as Non- to receive comments targeted/broad on the draft Citizen community Participation Plan. This meeting took place Residents of prior to the publication Public and of the draft 2020-2024 Assisted Consolidated Plan for Housing public review and comment. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 17 Page 149 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process Page 150 Mode of l`� Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde r utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 3 Flyers Non- The 2020-2024 No comments were No comments Not applicable. targeted/broad Consolidated Plan flyer received. were received. community was disseminated in paper and electronic formats, in both English and Spanish, announcing two Community Meetings to receive input on the preparation of the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and the 2020-2021 Action Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process Page 150 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 19 Page 151 l`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde F utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 4 Public Minorities Publicly -noticed Residents in attendance All comments Not applicable. Meeting Community Meeting on received a presentation were accepted. Persons with September 19, 2019 at on the Consolidated Plan disabilities 6:00 p.m. at Central and discussed housing Park — 11200 Base Line and community Non- Road. development needs with targeted/broad Planning Department community Staff. Residents of Public and Assisted Housing 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 19 Page 151 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 20 Page 152 l`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde r utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 5 Public Minorities Publicly -noticed Residents in attendance All comments Not applicable. Meeting Community Meeting on received a presentation were accepted. Persons with October 19, 2019 at on the Consolidated Plan disabilities 10:00 a.m. at the RC and discussed housing Family Resource and community Non- Center — 9791 Arrow development needs with targeted/broad Route. Planning Department community Staff. Residents of Public and Assisted Housing 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 20 Page 152 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 21 Page 153 I`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde r utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 6 Internet Non- The 2020-2024 The purpose of the All survey Not applicable. Outreach targeted/broad Consolidated Plan survey was to allow all responses were community Survey was available residents and accepted. online and in paper stakeholders the format at various City opportunity to provide facilities from their assessment of the September 17, 2019 to level of need in Rancho November 26, 2019. Cucamonga for a variety The City advised of housing, community residents and and economic stakeholders of the development activities. availability of the survey via email to In total, 470 residents stakeholders, posting and stakeholders on the City website, completed the survey. Facebook, Nextdoor, For a summary of all announcements at City survey responses, please Council meetings, and refer to Appendix B. during the Community Meetings. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 21 Page 153 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 22 Page 154 I`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary • comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde F utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 7 Newspaper Non- Newspaper ad No comments were No comments Not applicable. Ad targeted/broad published on March 12, received. were received. community 2020 in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin announcing the availability of the draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and draft 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan for a 30 -day public review and comment period to include a public hearing before the Rancho Cucamonga City Council on April 15, 2020. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 22 Page 154 Table 5 - Citizen Participation Outreach 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 23 Page 155 I`� Mode of Target of Summary of $e Summary of comments not Sort Summary of Comments rde F utreach to Outreach ponse/atte n dance received accepted and ' applicable) reasons 8 Public Minorities Public hearing before <Insert Comments <Insert Comments Not applicable. Hearing the Rancho Received> Not Accepted> Non-English Cucamonga City Speaking - Council on April 15, Specify other 2020 to receive language: Any comments on the draft otherlanguage 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and Persons with draft 2020-2021 disabilities Annual Action Plan prior to adoption and Non- submission to HUD. targeted/broad community Residents of Public and Assisted Housing Table 5 - Citizen Participation Outreach 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: The Process 23 Page 155 Needs Assessment NA -05 Overview Needs Assessment Overview The Needs Assessment section of the Consolidated Plan examines housing, homelessness, non- homeless special needs and non -housing community development needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income, tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income, disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and unsheltered homeless population in San Bernardino County to inform the City's strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non -homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who are not homeless but due to various reasons are in need of services including but not limited to elderly, frail elderly, the severely mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, and victims of domestic violence. The non -housing community development needs assessment section discusses the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements, and public services to benefit low- and moderate -income residents. Methodology To assess community needs, the City examined data, held community meetings, conducted a Consolidated Plan Survey and consulted with local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on the following sources of data. • American Community Survey (2011-2015, five-year estimates) • Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (2011-2015, five-year estimates) • Point in Time Count (2019) • Center for Disease Control (2013-2017 Drug Overdose Death Rate Increases) • Annual HIV Surveillance Report (2017) • State of California Department of Justice (2018) • National Crime Victimization Survey (2018) This report utilizes the 2011-2015 ACS 5 -year estimates and the 2011-2015 CHAS 5 -year estimates as they are the most current data sets supplied through HUD's eCon Planning Suite. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 24 Page 156 Consolidated Plan Survey for Residents and Stakeholders Rancho Cucamonga residents and program stakeholders had the opportunity to respond to the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan Survey to rate the needs in Rancho Cucamonga for housing facilities, housing services, community services, services for special needs populations, neighborhood services, community facilities, infrastructure and business and jobs services. The results of the 470 Rancho Cucamonga residents who respond to the survey are represented in Figures 1-8 below. Housing Facilities 095 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Housing for the Disabled Senior Housing Single Family Housing Affordable Rental Housing Transitional and Supportive Housing High Need M oderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 1 - Need for Improved Housing Facilities Housing Rehabilitation Assistance to Purchase a Home Fair Housing Discrimination Lead-based Paint Removal Energy Efficient Improvements Housing Services 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 2 - Need for Improved or Additional Housing Services 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 25 Page 157 Community Services D% 2656 40% 5D% 80% 10D% Senior Activities — Youth Activities Childcare Activities Transportation Services Anti- Crime Prograrns Health Care Services — Mental Health Services Legal Services High Need Moderate Need ■ Loin Need ■ No Need Figure 3 - Need for Improved or Additional community Services by Type or Target Population Special Needs Services 0% 20% 40% Centers/Services for the Disabled Domestic Violence Services Substance Abuse Services 5656 8656 166% i Homeless Services HIV/AIDS Centers and Services Neglected/Abused Children Centers and Services ■ High Need Moderate Need - Lowe deed ■ No Need Figure 4 - Need for Improved or Additional Services for Special Needs Populations 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 1 Page 158 Neighborhood Services 0% 20% 49% 60% 80% 100% Tree Planting Code Enforcement Graffiti Removal Parking Facilities Cleanup of Abandoned Lots and Buildings High °Need Moderate Need ■ Lata Need ■ No Need Figure 5 - Need for Improved or Additional Neighborhood Services Community Facilities ■ High Need Moderate Need F Low Need ■ No Need Figure 6 - Need for Improved or Additional Community Facilities 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 27 Page 159 0% 20% 40% 50`k SC ' CC Senior Centers i fi I Childcare Centers -A6� Er Youth Centers Parks I Ali Community Centers I Health Care Facilities Fire Stations I Libraries Accessibility Improvements I Homeless Emergency Shelters ■ High Need Moderate Need F Low Need ■ No Need Figure 6 - Need for Improved or Additional Community Facilities 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 27 Page 159 Infrastructure Improvements 095 20% 4095 6095 90% 100 `i5 drainage Improvement Water/Sewer Improvement Street/Alley Improvement - Street Lighting - Sidewalk Improvements Accessibility Improvements2 High Need Moderate Deed ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 7 - Need for Infrastructure Improvements Business Services 0% 20% 40% Start Up Business Assistance Small Business Loa nsjGrants Job Creation/Retention Employment Training Commercial Facade Improvements, 6C; SC- _CC>4 st High Need Moderate Need - Low Need ■ No Need Figure 8 - Need for Improved or Additional Business and Jobs Services 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 1: Page 160 NA -10 Housing Needs Assessment - 24 CFR 91.405, 24 CFR 91.205 (a,b,c) Summary of Housing Needs According to ACS 5 -year estimates (Table 6), from 2009 to 2015 the City's population increased by 4 percent from 165,269 to 171,855 residents and the number of households increased by 2 percent, from 54,253 to 55,240 units. The nominal median household income decreased from $77,871 to $77,396. The City of Rancho Cucamonga includes 55,240 households, of which 14,225, or 25.8 percent, earn less than 80 percent of Area Median Income (AMI) and 41,005, or 74.2 percent that earn more than 80 percent of AMI. When evaluating housing needs and problems, the Consolidated Plan considers households that are cost burdened (pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing costs), overcrowded (more than one person per room), and lack complete plumbing and/or kitchen facilities. Of all households earning less than 80 percent of AMI, 11,749, or 82.6 percent, experienced at least one of these housing problems. This is most pronounced (59.5 percent) for households that earn less than 50 percent of AMI. The ACS and CHAS data in Tables 6-13 below focus on the housing needs of different households in the City for different levels of income. Analysis of the tables indicate a high need for housing assistance targeted at 8,185 households earning at or below 50 percent of AMI, of which 6,224 pay more than 30 percent of their income for housing costs and 5,335 severely cost burdened households who pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs. Renter households that earn less than 50 percent of AMI are much more likely to experience cost burden than owner households at the same income range, 51.2 percent versus 24.9 percent respectively. Table 7 presents the number of different household types in the City for different levels of income. Small family households consist of 2-4 related household members, while large family households have more than five related household members. Of all households within Rancho Cucamonga, 29,030, or 52.6 percent, are considered small family households and 6,755, or 12.2 percent, are large family households. The income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD income definitions as follows: • 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income (7 percent of all households) • 30-50 percent AMI: low-income (8 percent of all households) • 50-80 percent AMI: moderate -income (11 percent of all households) • 80-100 percent AMI: medium income (8 percent of all households) • Greater than 100 percent of AMI: upper income (67 percent of all households) Tables 8 and 9 indicate the number of renter- and owner -occupied households for different AMI levels that are experiencing housing problems. Evaluation of those tables reveals 8,929 of the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 29 Page 161 14,225 households earning less than 80 percent of AMI experience at least one housing problem. HUD defines four different housing problems as: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush -toilet, and a bathtub or shower 3. Overcrowding / severe overcrowding: A household is considered to be overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls or half - rooms. A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room. 4. Cost burden / severe cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30% of its total gross income for housing costs. A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50% of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage, taxes, insurance and utilities. Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2011-2015 ACS (Most Recent Year) Number of Households Table Table 7 - Total Households Table Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 30 Page 162 :1 1 /'. 1 1'. / :/'. 11'. Pb 441 1 11'. HA I HAM Total Households 3,875 4,310 6,040 4,235 36,770 Small Family Households 1,425 1,665 2,720 2,100 21,120 Large Family Households 315 435 495 440 5,070 Household contains at least one person 62-74 years of age 655 870 1,325 1,024 6,480 Household contains at least one person age 75 or older 584 494 765 410 1,849 Households with one or more children 6 years old or younger 765 1 670 1 1,120 580 5,020 Table 7 - Total Households Table Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 30 Page 162 Housing Needs Summary Tables 1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs) 1jenter Owner 1 1. / :1 1 1 1 :1 Ita 30% 5 0'60 0% 100% Total 30% 50% 80% 0 % Too AMI AMI MI AMI AMJAMI A r-,�WJAM I NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Substandard Housing - Lacking complete plumbing or kitchen facilities 135 75 140 30 380 0 0 10 0 10 Severely Overcrowded - With >1.51 people per room (and complete kitchen and plumbing) 50 70 75 4 199 0 0 4 4 8 Overcrowded -With 1.01- 1.5 people per room (and none of the above problems) 225 174 210 75 684 4 29 30 45 108 Housing cost burden greater than 50% of income (and none of the above problems) 1,685 1,895 1,230 100 4,910 895 860 1,130 869 3,754 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 31 Page 163 Table 8 - Housing Problems Table Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe cost burden) Renter • - 1 - 1 1 :1 / 1 >80 - 30% 1'. 21'. 11'. • 30% :1'. 11'. • . AMIl 1 AMI AMI MI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Having 1 or more of four housing problems 2,095 2,220 1,650 210 6,175 905 889 1,170 919 3,883 Having none of four housing problems 180 580 1,600 1,470 3,830 95 629 1,615 1,634 3,973 Household has negative income, but none of the other housing problems 264 0 0 0 264 345 0 0 0 345 Table 9 - Housing Problems 2 Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 32 Page 164 3. Cost Burden > 30% Table 10 - Cost Burden > 30% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 4. Cost Burden > 50% Renter Owner 1 1 3 1 0-30% 0-30 . 50% 80% Total 50% 80% Total AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 965 1,215 1,265 3,445 315 400 810 1,525 Large Related 215 264 255 734 70 134 150 354 Elderly 475 514 553 1,542 400 419 475 1,294 Other 504 733 685 1,922 175 160 375 710 Total need by 2,159 2,726 2,758 7,643 960 1,113 1,810 3,883 income income Table 10 - Cost Burden > 30% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 4. Cost Burden > 50% Table 11 - Cost Burden > 50% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 33 Page 165 Renter Owne 1 1 1 0-30% 1 0-30% JZ O • • AMI AMI AMI AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Small Related 890 975 585 2,450 280 370 595 1,245 Large Related 215 129 125 469 70 99 100 269 Elderly 465 329 279 1,073 380 310 270 960 Other 500 729 365 1,594 175 90 180 445 Total need by 2,070 2,162 1,354 5,586 905 869 1,145 2,919 income Table 11 - Cost Burden > 50% Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 33 Page 165 Ij City of Rancho Cucamonga [") .,°% 20-60% a0-60% fioA ' a80% Source: HUD -CPD MAPS Figure 9 - Extremely Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS i'j i City of Rancho Cucamonga Source: HUD -CPD MAPS Figure 10 - Low -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 34 Page 166 :j City of Rancho Cucamonga ='_. X •_oz p xa aox +a -cox ' w.aox �aox Snurra• Him-rPn M6PS Figure 11 - Moderate -Income Households with Severe Cost Burden Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 5. Crowding (More than one person per room) Renter -slow Owner 1 1 1 :1 / 1 1 :1 1'. 1'. :1'. 11'. • . 1'. 1'. :1'. 11'. • . AMI AMI .,. fiAMl AMI AMI NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS Single family households 285 230 260 79 854 0 29 34 29 92 Multiple, unrelated family households 0 14 14 0 28 4 0 0 20 24 Other, non - family households 0 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 Total need by 285 244 309 79 917 4 29 34 49 116 income Table 12 - Crowding Information 1/2 Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 35 Page 167 Table 13 - Crowding Information 2/2 Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS Describe the number and type of single person households in need of housing assistance. There are 11,517 single person households in the City, representing 20.8 percent of all households. Approximately 3,425 of the single person households are 65 years of age or older according to the ACS, indicating that approximately 8,092 single person households are ages 18-64. According to Table 10, 2,632 households categorized as "other" experienced a cost burden. Other households include either single person households or unrelated households. Of those "other' households that are cost burdened, the majority are renters that earn between 30-50 percent of AMI. Over half of the homeowners that are cost burdened earn between 50-80 percent of AMI. According to Table 11, 2,039 households categorized as "other' experienced a severe cost burden. Of these "other' households experiencing a severe cost burden, the majority are renters earning 30-50 percent of AMI. By definition, single -person households do not experience housing overcrowding. No data is available for single -person households occupying substandard housing units. Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault and stalking. Based on ACS data, the total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 16 and over in Rancho Cucamonga is 166,785. Of this population, an estimated 14,358 persons have a disability and may require housing assistance. The obstacle to independent living for these adults is not only their disability, but also the lack of financial resources, often related to limited employment. Additionally, persons with disabilities have high health care costs, are dependent on supportive services, and may require accessibility modifications to accommodate their disability. As such, evaluation of household income characteristics reveals that households with members that have a disability are more likely to be low- or moderate -income households with one or more of the four housing problems. The State of California Department of justice maintains statistics on domestic violence statewide by jurisdiction. In 2018, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department responded to a total of 244 calls in Rancho Cucamonga related to domestic violence. Of these calls: • 206 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 36 Page 168 • 38 calls involved a weapon o 2 involved a firearm 0 6 domestic incidents involved a knife or cutting instruments 0 10 domestic incidents involved other dangerous weapons 0 20 domestic incidents involved personal weapons (i.e. feet or hands, etc.) Therefore, if each one of these calls represented a household with member(s) who required housing assistance, it can be estimated that there were up to 244 household in 2018 who were in need of some form of housing assistance. According to the 2018 National Crime Victimization Survey, this is a conservative estimate at best since most domestic violence cases (53 percent) are never reported to legal authorities. In households where physical violence occurred, it is possible that at least one member of the household will need to relocate to escape recurring violence. If 75 percent need to move, approximately 183 individuals — possibly with minor children — may require temporary housing assistance. The form of housing assistance required for special needs populations varies depending on the specific circumstances of each case. The City recognizes that it is crucial to prioritize the creation of additional affordable housing opportunities for low- and moderate -income households. It is also important to ensure that both new and existing affordable housing opportunities are accessible to special needs populations such as victims of domestic violence, persons with disabilities, single heads of households, seniors and transition age youth. What are the most common housing problems? The most common housing problem in the City is cost burden, which affects 81 percent of low- and moderate -income households, including 7,643 renter households and 3,883 owner households who pay more than 30 percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs. According to data in Table 10 and Table 11, of the 7,643 cost burdened renter households in Rancho Cucamonga, most are small related family households or "other" non -family households. Of those renter households experiencing cost burden, 5,586 households experience a severe cost burden. Of the severely cost - burdened households, most are either small family households or "other" non -family households such as individuals. Homeowner households also experience cost burden and severe cost burden. While cost burden for renter households was mostly concentrated in the group earning 30-50 percent of AMI, cost burden for homeowners was predominately concentrated in the group earning 50-80 percent of AMI. There are 2,836 elderly households earning less than 80 percent of AMI that experience housing cost burden. Of those households, 2,033 are severely cost burdened. With the understanding that people (aged 62+) have fixed incomes and are often unable to pursue employment, it is this group of extremely -low income elderly households that continues to be the most in need to rental assistance 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 37 Page 169 so that these households may afford the costs of daily living and meet basic needs such as food and prescription drugs. According to information presented in Table 12, the second most common housing problem in the City is overcrowding. Overcrowded housing conditions occur primarily for two reasons. First, a family household will be overcrowded because the housing unit they occupy is too small to accommodate the number of relatives in the family. Second, overcrowding occurs when more than one family occupies a housing unit. Of the households earning 0-80 percent of AMI in Rancho Cucamonga: • 905 (6.4 percent) are overcrowded 0 838 are renter households (92.6 percent of those overcrowded) ■ 775 are single-family households ■ 28 are multiple, unrelated family households ■ 35 are other, non -family households 0 67 are owner households (7.4 percent of those overcrowded) ■ 63 are single-family households ■ 4 are multiple, unrelated family households Based on the information in Table 12, family renter households are having the most difficult time renting a housing unit that is large enough to accommodate their families. However, compared to cost burden, the breadth of this problem is relatively lower. Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these problems? For households earning 0-80% of AMI, 4,970 small family households are cost burdened, of which 3,445 are renters and 1,525 are owners. For renters, households that earn 50-80 percent of AMI experience more cost burden than other income groups. For owners, households that earn 50-80 percent of AMI experience more cost burden than other income groups as well. In both tenure types, small family households and elderly households are the largest groups experiencing cost burden. According to data in Table 10, 3,695 small family households are severely cost burdened, of which 2,450 are renters and 1,245 are owners. For renters, households earning 30-50 percent of AMI are the most heavily impacted by severe cost burden than other income groups. For owners, households earning 50-80 percent of AMI experience severe cost burden than other income groups. According to Table 12, overcrowded housing conditions primarily impact single family households, with 92.6 percent of all overcrowded households comprised of renters. Of the renter households that are overcrowded, 31 percent earn between 0-30 percent of AMI, 27 percent earn 30-50 percent of AMI, 34 percent earn 50-80 percent of AMI and 9 percent earn between 80-100 percent of AMI. Housing overcrowding mostly impacts moderate -income renters. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 38 Page 170 Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re -housing assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance The leading indicators of risk for homelessness include extremely low-income and housing cost burden. Tables 10 and 11 indicate the number of households experiencing cost burden and severe cost burden by household type, tenancy, and household income. Based on the data in Table 10, 3,119 (80.5 percent) households earning 0-30 percent of AMI in the City are cost burdened. Of these households 2,159 (55.7 percent) are renters and 960 (24.8 percent) are owners. Most cost burdened renter households are extremely low-income households. Of the 2,159 extremely low-income renters that are cost burdened, 2,070 are severely cost burdened, paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs. Because this group has the lowest income and has housing costs that are less fixed than homeowners, this group is generally viewed as being the most at -risk of homelessness. Additionally, according to Table 13, 765 households earning less than 30 percent of AMI have one or more child 6 years old or younger. Of those 765 households, 645 are renter households which may be indicative of the number of households with young children that are currently housed that may be most at -risk becoming homeless or experiencing unstable housing. If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should also include a description of the operational definition of the at -risk group and the methodology used to generate the estimates: The assessment of at -risk populations is based on ACS and CHAS data in the Consolidated Plan using HUD definitions for household types and housing problems. In Rancho Cucamonga, the group that is most at -risk of becoming homeless includes those renters who earn 0-30 percent of AMI because this group has the lowest income and has housing costs that are not fixed. Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with instability and an increased risk of homelessness The leading indicators of risk for homelessness include extremely low-income and housing cost burden. As discussed earlier, there are 2,070 extremely low-income, severely cost burdened renters in Rancho Cucamonga. This group has the lowest income and has housing costs that are not fixed. Therefore, this group is viewed as being unstably housed and is the most at risk of homelessness. Discussion The most significant housing needs exist for 11,526 extremely low-, low- and moderate -income households paying more than 30 percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 39 Page 171 Of the 11,526 cost -burdened households, 7,643 are renters and 3,883 are owner households. Of the 7,643 cost -burdened renter households in Rancho Cucamonga, 2,180 small family households earn 0-50 percent of AMI. Further, 1,865 of the 2,180 small family households earning 0-50 percent of AMI, pay more than 50 percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs. This primarily affects renter households earning 0-50 percent of AMI and who pay 50 percent of their income for rent and utilities. Of the 11,526 cost -burdened households in Rancho Cucamonga, 2,836 households are elderly households earning 0-80 percent of AMI. With the understanding that elderly people (age 62+) have fixed incomes and are often unable to pursue employment it is this group of households that is most in need of rental assistance so that these households may afford the costs of daily living and meet basic needs such as food and prescription drugs. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 40 Page 172 NA -15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems - 91.405, 91.205 (b)(2) Introduction HUD requires all grantees to compare and assess the need for housing for any racial or ethnic group present in the community. A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group experience a housing problem at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the income level as a whole. For example, when evaluating 0-30 percent of AMI households, if 50 percent of the households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of a particular racial or ethnic group of households experience housing problems, that racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need. The housing problems identified in Tables 14-17 below are defined as: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower 3. Overcrowding: A household is considered to be overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people per room. 4. Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Due to the low share of American Indian / Alaskan Native and Pacific Islander households in the City, the estimates from the ACS and CHAS datasets for specific income levels present data with relatively large margins of error. As such, these populations are included in the analysis, but should be evaluated with the understanding of the larger margin of errors. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 41 Page 173 0%-30% of Area Median Income Housing Problem as one or moreHas of four housing problems Household ha none of the no/negative four housing income, but none problems of the other housing problems Household no/negative income, but non jurisdiction• - of the other housing problem 1 1 .1• Black- Black- '•1 1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 American .. - 1 Pacific Islander1 Pacific Islander1 1 1 ' • 1 Table 14 — Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS ��Iy�•YIy WA��Ni-:MIA I'vor,IR Housing Problems jurisdiction• - Has one or mor of four housing problems 1 Has none of the four housing Household no/negative income, but non problems '.• of the other housing problem 1 Black- :1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 1 Pacific Islander1 1 .. ' • 1 Table 15 — Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 42 Page 174 50%-80% of Area Median Income Housing Problem as one or moreHas of four housing problems Household ha none of the no/negative four housing income, but none problems of the other housing problems Household no/negative income, but non jurisdictionwhole of the other housing problem 1 1 1 Black- 1 1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 American .. - '1 1 / Pacific Islander1 / 1 1 •' 1 Table 16 — Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS E:1@37, IIy �Aii �lligM . •iii Housing Problems jurisdictionwhole Has one or mor of four housing Problems Has none of the four housing Household no/negative income, but non problems of the other housing problem Black- : 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 / 1 Pacific Islander1 / 1 .. •' 1 Table 17 — Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 43 Page 175 Discussion Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have disproportionately greater levels of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing housing problems: • Black / African American households with incomes of 0-30 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • Asian households with incomes of 0-30 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • American Indian / Alaskan Native households with incomes of 30-50 percent of AMI • Pacific Islander households with incomes of 30-50 percent of AMI • Hispanic households with incomes of 80-100 percent of AMI At 0-30 percent of AMI, 80.9 percent of all households experience at least one housing problem. 92.5 percent of Black / African American (490) households at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 92.9 percent of Asian households (524) at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. At 30-50 percent of AMI, 89.1 percent of all households experience at least one housing problem. 100 percent of Native Indian / Alaska Native (29) and Pacific Islander (25) households at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. At 80-100 percent of AMI, 72.6 percent of all households experience at least one housing problem. 89.5 percent of Black / African American (325) households at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 92.9 percent of Asian (460) households at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 82.8 percent of Hispanic (935) households at this income level experience a housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 44 Page 176 NA -20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems - 91.405, 91.205 (b) (2) Introduction Assessing housing conditions in the City provides the basis for developing strategies to maintain and preserve the quality of the housing stock. Similar to the previous section, a disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group experience a housing problem at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the income level as a whole. For example, when evaluating 0-30 percent of AMI households, if 50 percent of the households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of a particular racial or ethnic group experiences a housing problem, that racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need. Severe housing problems include: 1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator. 2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower. 3. Severe overcrowding: A household is considered to be severely overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room. 4. Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities. Due to the low share of American Indian / Alaskan Native and Pacific Islander households in the City, the estimates from the ACS and CHAS datasets for specific income levels present data with relatively large margins of error. As such, these populations are included in the analysis, but should be evaluated with the understanding of the larger margin of errors. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 45 Page 177 0%-30% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problem as one or moreHas of four housing problems Household ha none of the no/negative four housing income, but none problems of the other housing problems jurisdiction• - jurisdiction• - 111 .1• Black- Black- •1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 American .. - Pacific Islander1 Pacific Islander1 1 1 Table 18 - Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 30%-50% of Area Median Income Housing Problems as one or m f four housingour problems Household Pas none of the no/negativeSevere housing income, but non problems of the other housing proble /• / jurisdiction• - /• Black- 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 1 Pacific Islander1 1 Table 19 - Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 46 Page 178 50%-80% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problem + as one or more of four housing problems Household ha Has none of the no/negative four housing income, but none problems of the other housing problems jurisdiction• - jurisdiction•- /' 1 Black- Black- 1 1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 American Indian, / 1 Pacific Islander/ Pacific Islander1 / 1 1 Table 20 - Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 80%-100% of Area Median Income Severe Housing Problem as one or mor of four housing problems Household ha Has none of the no/negative four housing income, but none problems of the other housing problems jurisdiction• - /' 1 Black- '1 1 American Indian,Alaska Native1 / 1 Pacific Islander/ / 1 Table 21 — Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 47 Page 179 Discussion Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of severe housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing severe housing problems: • Asian households with incomes 0-30 percent of AMI • Black / African American households with incomes of 30-50 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • American Indian / Alaska Native households with incomes of 30-50 percent and 50-80 percent of AMI • Hispanic households with incomes of 50-80 percent of AMI At 0-30 percent of AMI, 77.2 percent of all households experience at least one severe housing problem. 92.2 percent of Asian (519) households at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. At 30-50 percent of AMI, 72 percent of all households experience at least one severe housing problem. 87.5 percent of Black / African American (245) households at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 100 percent of American Indian / Alaska Native (29) households at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. At 50-80 percent of AMI, 46.7 percent of all households experience at least one severe housing problem. 72.7 percent of Native Indian / Alaska Native (40) at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 56.8 percent of Hispanic (980) at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. At 80-100 percent of AMI, 26.7 percent of all households experience at least one severe housing problem. 65 percent of Black / African American (240) households at this income level experience a severe housing problem resulting in a disproportionately greater need. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment IMS! Page 180 NA -25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens - 91.405, 91.205 (b)(2) Introduction A disproportionately greater need exists when the members of a racial or ethnic group are cost burdened at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than the population as a whole. For example, if 50 percent of the households are cost burdened, but 60 percent or more of a particular racial or ethnic group are cost burdened, that racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater level of cost burden. HUD defines cost burden as the extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceeds 30 percent of a given household's gross income. A household is considered severely cost burdened if gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceeds 50 percent of a household's gross income. Housing Cost Burden Housing Cost Burden <=30%. - POOR -. Jurisdiction as a whole 31,454 12,524 10,649 619 White 16,030 5,205 4,699 329 Black / African American 2,355 1,165 1,230 20 Asian 3,345 1,635 1,225 40 American Indian, Alaska Native 60 0 75 0 Pacific Islander 30 25 0 0 Hispanic 8,920 1 4,140 3,059 154 Table 22 — Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI Data Source: 2011-2015 CHAS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 49 Page 181 Discussion Based on this analysis, 22.9 percent of Rancho Cucamonga households experience a cost burden and 19.5 percent of Rancho Cucamonga households experience a severe cost burden, while 57.6 percent are not cost burdened or severely cost burdened. The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater cost burden or severe cost burden relative to the percentage of all households experiencing a cost burden or severe cost burden: • 55.6 percent of American Indian / Alaska Native households experienced a severe cost burden, which is a rate of 36.1 percent more than the City as a whole • 45.5 percent of Pacific Islander households experienced a cost burden, which is a rate of 22.5 percent more than the City as a whole Due to the low share of American Indian / Alaskan Native and Pacific Islander households in the City, the estimates from the ACS and CHAS datasets for specific income levels present data with relatively large margins of error. As such, these populations are included in the analysis, but should be evaluated with the understanding of the larger margin of errors. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 50 Page 182 NA -30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion - 91.205 (b) (2) Are there any Income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as a whole? Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have disproportionately greater level of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing housing problems: • Black / African American households with incomes of 0-30 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • Asian households with incomes of 0-30 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • American Indian / Alaskan Native households with incomes of 30-50 percent of AMI • Pacific Islander households with incomes of 30-50 percent of AMI • Hispanic households with incomes of 80-100 percent of AMI Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately greater level of severe housing problems relative to the percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing severe housing problems: • Asian households with incomes 0-30 percent of AMI • Black / African American households with incomes of 30-50 percent and 80-100 percent of AMI • American Indian / Alaska Native households with incomes of 30-50 percent and 50-80 percent of AMI • Hispanic households with incomes of 50-80 percent of AMI Due to the low share of American Indian / Alaskan Native and Pacific Islander households in the City, the estimates from the ACS and CHAS datasets for specific income levels present data with relatively large margins of error. As such, these populations are included in the analysis, but should be evaluated with the understanding of the larger margin of errors. If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs? No other needs for these specific racial or ethnic groups were identified through consultation with stakeholders or through citizen participation. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 51 Page 183 Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or neighborhoods in your community? Based on the data presented in section NA -15, there are 14,823 households in the City of Rancho Cucamonga with incomes 0-100 percent of AMI who experience one or more of the four housing problems. According to data in section NA -25, 23,792 households or approximately 43 percent of all households in the City are cost burdened (12,524 households), severely cost burdened (10,649 households) or that have no or negative income but that are presumed to have a cost burden (619 households). Examination of CPD Maps (Figures 12-19) reveals the following for each of the racial or ethnic groups determined to have a housing problem or a severe housing problem: • White: According to Figure 12, high concentrations of this race are located in the northwestern region of the City with most of these Census tracts ranging from 38-58 percent; however, with several greater than 58 percent. • Black / African American: According to Figure 13, the only concentration of this race is located in the southeastern region of the City with two Census tracts with higher concentrations. • Asian: According to Figure 14, higher concentrations of this race are located in the southern and north eastern region of the City with most of these Census tracts ranging from 17-31 percent. • American Indian / Alaska Native: According to Figure 15, there are no concentrations of this race in any particular area of the City. Each of the City's Census tracts are comprised of fewer than 3 percent American Indian / Alaskan Native people. • Pacific Islander: According to Figure 16, the only concentration of this race is located in the central region of the City with one Census tract that ranges from 2-7 percent. • Hispanic: According to Figure 19, high concentrations of this ethnicity are located in all regions of the City, with the exception of the northwestern region, with most of these Census tracts ranging from 28-47 percent; however, several have higher concentrations. Based on the foregoing analysis of maps, none of these groups are isolated to one particular neighborhood in the City. HUD Community Planning and Development Maps (CPD Maps) The maps below illustrate the racial or ethnic composition of the City by Census tract as reported in the 2011-2015 American Community Survey Estimates. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 52 Page 184 Figure 12 - White alone (not Hispanic) Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Figure 13 - Black / African American Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment City of Rancho Cucamonga W—AmroI-Iaup ) o -v e1% 11811e.MY 50 ZI50.90% Se 3318 e]Y ' 7657% Source: HUD -CPD MAPS City of Rancho Cucamonga 9mc5 0� Ahk.n Am.nun .lora (n01 n�.v.mq o-. nvx p ae3.n 33% ® 13 33-x163% 3783-5106% ' X53 OeY Source: HUD -CPD MAPS 53 Page 185 j Data Source: j 01015 1 viol 161 F—IT41 Figure 14 - Asian Data Source: Figure 15 - American Indian / Alaska Native 2011-2015 ACS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment City of Rancho Cucamonga urce: HUD -CPD MA City of Rancho Cucamonga M.p L.s.m [not H15BSelc1 o -z 48% 5 7&215)% 2453-075% a5815% urce- HUD -CPD MAI 11 54 Page 186 Figure 16 - Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Figure 17 - Two or more races Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment City of Rancho Cucamonga Mp Lp.M % N.— X..N1— P.- IfYntltt—, Inst Xi.p.ninl IJ 0-223% ]]&1.36x ' ,1&1883% taas.x9e% ' .4366% Source: HUD -CPD MAPS City of Rancho Cucamonga iwv w iww. �c..Inat Xi.P.n.cl oz wx p 26as.aax ' SM12l 3% 129}3436% ab 3a% 55 Page 187 Figure 18 - Some other race Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Data Source: 216 Fw +'�+ E3asellne R r ✓. F th.1 Blvd i a ip — Arrow Rfi. 2011-2015 ACS I I L.._..J Y Figure 19 - Hispanic 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment City of Rancho Cucamonga Same oNn nu eb�e leol n�eoenal o-0.55% o5S134% ® 1242]8% 2 39-4-m 14 35% ource: HUD -CPD MAP' City of Rancho Cucamonga venom arni.wn•c amu, o -n zzx p 13 nas lax 2a �e.4v eo% a2 sa-�1 sox a]1 sox ource: HUD -CPD MAP 56 Page 188 NA -35 Public Housing - 91.405, 91.205 (b) Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within the service area of the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB). The HACSB was established in 1941 to actively improve existing neighborhoods, develop affordable housing opportunities and promote home ownership. Public housing and other assisted housing programs are part of the County's efforts to address the affordable housing needs of low- and moderate -income families in Rancho Cucamonga. The data presented in the tables below is for HACSB and the narrative questions address the needs for the entire county, with specific references to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Countywide, HACSB currently manages and operates 99 public housing units. HACSB owns 2,105 additional units, is in a limited liability partnership for 778 units and has 1,371 units in its portfolio with Housing Partners I, Inc. The HACSB manages 10,821 Section 8 vouchers, the majority of which are tenant -based vouchers. According to HACSB's 2018 Annual Report, there are 315 Section 8 vouchers currently in use in Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, there are six units that are part of the Housing Partners I, Inc.'s portfolio. In the upcoming five years, HACSB plans to focus efforts on rehabilitating and preserving existing housing units and continuing existing programs and activities. Totals in Use Table 23 - Public Housing by Program Type *includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 57 Page 189 Characteristics of Residents Characteristic All • Average Annual Income $17,344 Average Household Size 2.41 Elderly (>62) Households 3,450 Disabled Households 5,053 Average Contract Rent $1,204 Table 24 — Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type Data Source: Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) Race of Residents Table 25 — Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment Page 190 Program Ty IL M Mod- Public jp Race ertificate Rehab Housing TotalProje enantFet7 Affaiamily -based -based Unification Isable Supportive Program Housing American 1 1 1 1 Indian/AlaskaAmerican Native 1 1 1 1 1 Pacific Islander Table 25 — Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment Page 190 Ethnicity of Residents Table 26 — Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in any program or activity that is conducted by federal agencies or that receives financial assistance from a federal agency. A housing provider may not deny or refuse to sell or rent to a person with a disability and may not impose application or qualification criteria, rental fees or sales prices and rental or sales terms or conditions that are different than those required of or provided to persons who are not disabled. Further, housing providers may not require persons with disabilities to live only on certain floors, or to all live in one section of the housing. Housing providers may not refuse to make repairs and may not limit or deny someone with a disability access to recreational and other public and common use facilities, parking privileges, cleaning or janitorial services or any services which are made available to other residents. In calendar year 2019, HACSB received a total of 120 Reasonable Accommodation requests, 8 of which were for modifications to a unit or for Section 504 accessibility to common use facilities. HACSB calculates that 0.9 percent of the households in its existing portfolio requested modification to a unit or made a request for Section 504 accessibility to common use facilities. As noted in the tables above, 508 vouchers are for households with at least one person with disabilities and for the County of San Bernardino, there are 5,053 public housing households with at least one person with disabilities. The current waitlist for public housing units includes 8,300 disabled or elderly households. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 59 Page 191 Program Type Voucher pecial Purpose Vouc Mod- erari�nicity Public�Nroj"Ie�ennqVfairs Certificate Rehab Housing Total MMIII -based -based Unification isa e Supportive 9WIM1111 Program Housing Table 26 — Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type includes Non -Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One -Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing Home Transition Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center) Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units: Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in any program or activity that is conducted by federal agencies or that receives financial assistance from a federal agency. A housing provider may not deny or refuse to sell or rent to a person with a disability and may not impose application or qualification criteria, rental fees or sales prices and rental or sales terms or conditions that are different than those required of or provided to persons who are not disabled. Further, housing providers may not require persons with disabilities to live only on certain floors, or to all live in one section of the housing. Housing providers may not refuse to make repairs and may not limit or deny someone with a disability access to recreational and other public and common use facilities, parking privileges, cleaning or janitorial services or any services which are made available to other residents. In calendar year 2019, HACSB received a total of 120 Reasonable Accommodation requests, 8 of which were for modifications to a unit or for Section 504 accessibility to common use facilities. HACSB calculates that 0.9 percent of the households in its existing portfolio requested modification to a unit or made a request for Section 504 accessibility to common use facilities. As noted in the tables above, 508 vouchers are for households with at least one person with disabilities and for the County of San Bernardino, there are 5,053 public housing households with at least one person with disabilities. The current waitlist for public housing units includes 8,300 disabled or elderly households. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 59 Page 191 What are the number and type of families on the waiting lists for public housing and section 8 tenant - based rental assistance? Based on the information above, and any other information available to the jurisdiction, what are the most immediate needs of residents of public housing and Housing Choice voucher holders? The most pressing need for residents of public housing and Housing Choice voucher holders is access to affordable housing. The high demand for affordable housing throughout the county is evidenced by the long waitlists for public housing units and vouchers. As of 2019, the waitlist for the public housing residents (including RAD -converted sites) included 17,720 households, including 2,879 elderly/disabled households, 14,899 extremely low-income households, 2,033 very low-income households and 728 low-income households. As of 2019, the waitlist for Housing Choice Vouchers (tenant -based and project -based) included 52,374 households. This includes 8,300 elderly/disabled households, 39,704 extremely low-income households, 8,455 very low-income households and 3,897 low-income households. Beyond the need for affordable housing, residents also need additional access to service programs such as: • job training and placement; • Youth employment and educational programs; • Childcare services; and • Transportation. How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at large? The needs for additional services for county public housing residents align with the needs of low- and moderate -income households in Rancho Cucamonga. Discussion In 2013, the Housing Authority received approval from HUD to convert its public housing units to project -based vouchers under the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program, which helps preserve affordable housing. Under RAD, housing authorities can generate and leverage equity on the properties to renovate, replace and repair this aging housing stock. Due to its RAD approval, HACSB is redeveloping its Waterman Gardens Community. Furthermore, it has been conducting several million dollars' worth of renovations to other former public housing communities. By the end of 2019, the majority of HACSB's public housing units had undergone RAD conversion with 99 units remaining. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 60 Page 192 NA -40 Homeless Needs Assessment - 91.405, 91.205 (c) Introduction There are four federally defined categories under which individuals and families may qualify as homeless: 1) literally homeless; 2) imminent risk of homelessness; 3) homeless under other Federal statues; and 4) fleeing/attempting to flee domestic violence. According to the 2019 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress, over one quarter of the nation's homeless population is in California and nearly half of all the nation's homeless individuals are in three states: California (27 percent), New York (16 percent), and Florida (five percent). California and New York have the highest rate of homelessness among all individuals, at 38 and 46 people per 10,000 individuals. San Bernardino County has more than two million residents and a geographic area of 20,105 square miles that includes 48 cities. Homelessness is addressed regionally through the Continuum of Care (CoC) also known as the San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership (SBCHP). The SBCHP consists of three distinct bodies: the San Bernardino County Interagency Council on Homelessness (ICH), the Homeless Provider Network (HPN) and the Office of Homeless Services (OHS). The SBCHP was developed to promote a strong collaboration between agencies to direct planning, development and implementation of the San Bernardino County Homelessness Action Plan which was adopted in 2019. To better understand the nature and extent of homelessness, every year on a single night in January, HUD requires communities across the country to conduct a comprehensive count of their homeless population. The most recent available data as of this writing is from the Point in Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) held in January of 2019. The 2019 PIT Count reported that 2,607 people are homeless in San Bernardino County on any given night. Overall, the 2019 PIT Count illustrates a 23.1 percent increase in homelessness when compared to the prior year PIT Count of 2,118 homeless persons. The City of Rancho Cucamonga 2019 PIT Count reported that 58 individuals are homeless on any given night. This represents a 9.4 percent decrease over the prior year of 64 homeless persons. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 61 Page 193 Homeless Needs Assessment 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 62 Page 194 Estimate the # of Estimate the Estimate Estimate the # the # Estimate t e # of day persons experiencing Population homelessness on a experiencing becoming # exitin persons night homelessnes given homelessness homeless each year experien homelessnes each year each year Persons in Households with Adult(s) and Persons in Households with Only Children Persons in Households with Only Adults Chronically Homeless. . . Chronically Homeless INN 0 '1 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 62 Page 194 Table 27 - Homeless Needs Assessment Data Source: San Bernardino County Point in Time Count, 2019 Note: The estimates for experiencing, becoming, exiting and duration are provide based on San Bernardino County HMIS data for 2019 for all individual entering and exiting emergency shelters within the County, This data includes duplicate counts of those who entered emergency shelter more than once during the year to provide a summary of the instances of homelessness and entries into emergency shelters within the County. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 63 Page 195 Changes in Homeless Rates in California Counties, 2017-2019 0.60°/6 0.50% 0.40°/0 0.30°/6 0.20% 0.10/6 0.00°/6 Las Orange Riverside San San Diego Santa Ventura Angeles Bemardino Barbara 12017 ■ 2019 Figure 20 - Changes in Homeless Rates in California Counties, 2017 and 2019 Data Source: California Department of Finance UnshelteredYear Sheltered Total 2017 1,179 687 1,866 2018 1,143 675 2,118 2019 1,920 687 2,607 Table 28 - Point -in -Time Counts 2017-2019 Data Source: San Bernardino Point in Time Counts (2017 — 2019) If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth): A chronically homeless individual is an unaccompanied homeless individual (living in an emergency shelter or in an unsheltered location) with a disabling condition that has been continuously homeless for a year or more or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three years. Of the 816 homeless individuals and persons in families that were reported as chronically homeless, 89 were sheltered, and 727 were unsheltered. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 64 Page 196 Families with children include at least one household member age 18 or over and at least one household member under the age of 18. According to the PIT Count, there were 39 homeless families with at least one adult and one child, comprised of 5 families (20 people) living in emergency or transitional shelters and 34 unsheltered families (83 people) in need of housing assistance. Veterans are persons who have served on active duty in the Armed Forces of the United States. This does not include inactive military reserves or the National Guard unless the person was called up to active duty. The PIT Count revealed 32 sheltered veterans and 175 unsheltered veterans. Unaccompanied youth are individuals under the age of 18 years old, who are presumed to be emancipated if they are unsheltered without an adult. According to PIT Count, there were 10 unaccompanied youth, five of which were sheltered. Additionally, 437 homeless individuals were categorized as severely mentally ill meaning that they have mental health problems that are expected to be of long, continued and indefinite in duration and will substantially impair their ability to live independently. Of the 437 homeless individuals that were reported as severely mentally ill, 68 individuals were sheltered, and 369 individuals remained unsheltered. Further, the 2019 Point in Time report revealed a total of 47 homeless people with HIV/AIDS. Of these 47 homeless people with HIV/AIDS, six people were sheltered, and 41 people were unsheltered. vature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional) Race:•. • . White 346 1,056 Black or African American 272 386 Asian 6 14 American Indian or Alaska Native 3 54 Pacific Islander 11 11 Other, Multi -Racial 49 Sheltered:-. 399 •. • Hispanic 242 556 Not Hispanic 445 1,364 Table 29 - San Bernardino Homeless Population Race/Ethnicity Data Source: San Bernardino Point in Time Count (2019) Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for families with children and the families of veterans. According to the 2019 Point -in -Time Count, there were 39 homeless families with at least one adult and one child. Of the 39 homeless families, five homeless families (20 people) were living in emergency 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 65 Page 197 or transitional shelters. Thirty-four families (83 people) were unsheltered and in need of housing assistance. Countywide, an estimated 34 housing units that are affordable to extremely low-income households are needed to reduce the number of homeless families with children. For veterans, a total of 207 homeless veterans were identified in the 2019 Point -in -Time Count. Of these 207 homeless veterans, 32 veterans were sheltered, and 175 veterans were unsheltered. Countywide, an estimated 175 housing units that are affordable to extremely low- or low-income households are needed to reduce the number of homeless veterans. Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic Group. Under the federal policy for reporting race, there are five categories: 1) White, 2) Black / African American, 3) Asian, 4) American India or Alaska Native and Pacific Islander. For ethnicity, there are two categories: 1) Hispanic or Latino and 2) Non -Hispanic or Non -Latino. The homeless population in San Bernardino County is generally comparable to national averages. Most of the homeless people nationally identified themselves as either White or Black in terms of race with a substantial increase in unsheltered Hispanics from 20 to 29 percent in the last five years. Of the 2,607 respondents who reported a race as compared to the distribution of races among the countywide population, 53.8 percent of the respondents identified themselves as White/Caucasian, 25.2 percent as Black/African American, 17.1 percent as Other and six percent of the unsheltered homeless persons stated that they did not know their race or chose not to provide a response to this question. In terms of ethnicity, 67 percent of unsheltered homeless individuals were identified as non -Hispanic and 29 percent identified themselves as being Hispanic or Latino, while 4 percent of the respondents did not know their ethnicity or chose not to provide a response to this question. Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered Homelessness. Approximately 1,920 people or 73.6 percent of San Bernardino County's homeless population was unsheltered and living in uninhabitable living environments (i.e. living in the streets, vehicles or tents) at the time of the PIT Count. Approximately 687 people or 26.3 percent of homeless people counted were sheltered. Among the 687 sheltered persons, 440 were in emergency shelters, 247 were in transitional housing including safe haven sheltersa form of supportive housing that serves hard -to - reach homeless persons with severe mental illness who come primarily from the streets and have been unable or unwilling to participate in housing or supportive services. Discussion The lack of affordable housing continues to be the primary factor of homelessness within the County and has led to high rent burdens, overcrowding, and substandard housing, which has not only forced many people to become homeless but has also put a growing number of people at risk of becoming homeless. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 66 Page 198 The SBCHP recently prepared the San Bernardino County Homelessness Action Plan in place of its Ten -Year Strategy to End Homelessness. It included nine recommended actions pertaining to the alignment of jurisdictions; local data sources; core intake and assessment requirements; subpopulations; and federal state, county, city and private funding sources to prevent and end local homelessness. In addition, the Homelessness Action Plan includes seven additional recommendations for ICH in their role to prevent and end homelessness: Help the County, regions, and cities prepare, adopt and implement plans and process improvements to streamline housing approvals and accelerate housing production including permanent supportive housing. • Increase the number of permanent supportive housing units in order to decrease the number of chronically homeless individuals and families. • Set an annual quantifiable number of permanent supportive housing units to be developed based on the number of unsheltered chronically homeless individual identified in the recent Point -in -Time homeless count, HMIS and Coordinated Entry System. • Ensure that eligible public and private entities apply for funds to increase permanent supportive housing from all state funding sources that prioritize permanent supportive housing. • Ensure that eligible public and private entities apply for funds from all other state funding sources that prioritize activities to prevent and end homelessness. • Conduct a series of meetings with potential housing developers. • Appoint a point person to organize and facilitate the series of meetings with potential housing developers. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 67 Page 199 NA -45 Non -Homeless Special Needs Assessment - 91.405, 91.205 (b,d) Introduction This section evaluates persons who are not homeless but due to various reasons are in need of services and supportive housing. Persons with special needs include the elderly, frail elderly, severely mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will consider allocating CDBG public service funding to programs that provide services to special needs populations, including but not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, mentally disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence or other needs. Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your community: Elderly and frail elderly The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines elderly as a person who is 62 years of age or older. A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to perform at least three "activities of daily living" including eating, bathing or home management activities. Generally, elderly persons have lower incomes than the population at large. Based on 2011-2015 CHAS data, of the 14,456 total households containing at least one elderly person, 32 percent (4,693) of households earn less than 80 percent of the AMI in Rancho Cucamonga. Persons with Disabilities HUD defines a disabled person as having a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities. The obstacle to independent living for these adults is not only their disability, but also the lack of financial resources, often related to limited employment. Additionally, persons with disabilities have high health care costs, are dependent on supportive services, and may require accessibility modifications to accommodate their disability. Based on ACS data, of the total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 16 and over (166,785) in Rancho Cucamonga, an estimated 14,358 persons have a disability. Of these persons, 22.7 percent are employed, and 73.3 percent are not in the labor force. Alcohol and Other Drug Addictions Drug abuse or substance abuse is defined as the use of chemical substances that lead to an increased risk of problems and an inability to control the use of the substance. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there were 70,237 drug overdose deaths in the United States in 2017 and that of those deaths, 47,600 involved opioids. According to the CDC, the national 'opioid 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 68 Page 200 epidemic' began in the 1990s with increased prescribing of opioids such as Methadone, Oxycodone, and Hydrocodone. Beginning in 2010, CDC reported rapid increases in overdose deaths involving heroin. The third wave began in 2013 with increases in overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids such as the illicitly manufactured fentanyl, often found in combination with heroin, counterfeit pills, and cocaine. Although California was among 10 states with the lowest drug overdose mortality in each year from 2014-2017, the proliferation of fentanyl is a significant and relatively new issue requiring increased public awareness and services. HIV/AIDS Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one's immune system by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. According to the 2017 Annual HIV Surveillance Report for San Bernardino, there were 4,401 persons living with HIV countywide, with 88 deaths among persons diagnosed with HIV at the end of 2017. Victims of Domestic Violence Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2018, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department responded to a total of 244 calls related to domestic violence in Rancho Cucamonga. Of these calls, 206 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon. However, 38 calls involved a weapon of which 2 involved a firearm, 6 incidents involved a knife or cutting instrument, 10 involved other dangerous weapons, and 20 involved personal weapons such as feet or hands. What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations and how are these needs determined? To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs populations, the City conducted surveys, consulted with local service providers and reviewed ACS data. Supportive services required for special needs populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare, transportation and job training provided for the purpose of facilitating a person's stability and independence. In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no -step thresholds, installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops and accessible hardware. The needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities require visual adaptations for such items as the telephone ringer, the doorbell and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on appliances and 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 69 Page 201 controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and displays, contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows. For persons with special needs, the high cost of living in Rancho Cucamonga makes it very difficult for to maintain a stable residence. Often these segments of the population rely on support services from various nonprofit organizations to avoid becoming homeless or institutionalized. Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area: Between 2013-2017, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that annual rate of overall diagnosis of HIV infections in the United States decreased; however, it continued to increase in various subgroups. Rates increased for persons between the ages of 15-19, 24-34; remained stable for those between 35-39 and decreased for the remaining age groups. Rates increased for American Indians/Alaskan Natives and Hawaiians/Pacific Islanders. Rates for Hispanics and Asians remained stable and decreased for African Americans and whites. Nonetheless, African Americans had the highest rate of incidence (39.3 percent/ 100,000), followed by Hispanics (16.2 percent). Whites and Asians continue to have the lowest rates nationally, at 4.9 percent and 4.7 percent respectively. There is a concern that the disease is increasingly affecting younger generations, because of their tendency to have short term relationships, online dating and lack of access to health information and services. According to the 2017 Preliminary State HIV Surveillance Report, a total 4,401 people were identified as having HIV/AIDS in San Bernardino County. That is a 35 percent increase since 2013. Of the 4,401 estimated persons living with HIV/AIDS in San Bernardino County, 3,120 or 70 percent are receiving in -care services and more than half of the cases (2,278 or 51.8 percent) are persons who are virally suppressed. Eighty-eight persons passed away from the disease in 2017 in the County, an increase of 42 percent from 2013. It should be noted that the actual number of people living with HIV/AIDS is even higher because some infected people are unaware of their status. The numbers do not include those individuals who have moved into this county to receive care. Discussion Rancho Cucamonga residents with special needs include, but are not limited to the elderly, frail elderly, severely mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled, persons with alcohol and other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence. Challenges these special needs populations face includes low-income and high housing costs. This segment of the population also struggles for a decent quality of life that includes basic necessities, adequate food and clothing, and medical care. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 70 Page 202 In the last five years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga allocated CDBG public service funds for activities including those support services for the homeless and at -risk of homelessness and victims of domestic violence. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 71 Page 203 NA -50 Non -Housing Community Development Needs - 91.415, 91.215 (f) Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Facilities: The City of Rancho Cucamonga provides a variety of public facilities that meet the recreational and service needs of its residents. As the City continues to grow, new facilities and open spaces are incorporated into these master planned neighborhoods. While new facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities constructed in some of the City's original neighborhoods during the 1970s and 1980s may require rehabilitation to address the changing needs of the community, to modernize amenities to better meet resident needs or to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements align with the goals of the Strategic Plan and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve the City of Rancho Cucamonga public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income people or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as elderly people and disabled adults. Some of the types of facilities and infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but are not limited to, senior centers, youth centers, parks and recreation facilities, sidewalks and pedestrian paths. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has the James L. Brulte Senior Center which serves as a resource to help direct seniors to valuable outside resources and programs and also offers high quality programming to enrich the lives of seniors, including educational classes, exercise programs, art education, health promotion, transportation, counseling and support functions. Additionally, the City has the RC Sports Center, a dedicated facility for youth, hosts a variety of youth programs. Parks and recreational facilities serve an important role in a community. They provide opportunities for resident interaction and improve the overall aesthetic of a neighborhood. Funds can be used to provide for the rehabilitation of facilities or buildings used primarily for recreation, and develop open spaces that will serve low- and moderate -income areas. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has 30 parks, including eleven softball/baseball fields, eleven basketball courts, fourteen soccer/football fields, three volleyball courts, three tennis courts, and seventeen playgrounds. How were these needs determined? The needs identified for public facilities in the City were determined through community meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey, and consultation with City officials and other local stakeholders. Within the Consolidated Plan, priority is given to facilities that primarily benefit low- income beneficiaries, particularly those with critically needed renovation or demonstrated need for expansion to accommodate the needs of low-income residents. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 72 Page 204 Figure 21 - Need for Additional or Improved Community Facilities Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements: The City has an on-going need for public improvements and follows an annual Capital Improvement Program to meet those needs. The Capital Improvement Program includes various important programs that focus on landscaping, facilities, municipal utility, parks, railroad crossings, streets, and traffic. The Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program includes two (2) landscaping projects, 15 facility projects, five (5) municipal utility projects, nine (9) park projects, one (1) railroad crossing project, 12 street projects, seven (7) traffic projects and 10 miscellaneous projects with an overall cost of approximately $78 million. Public facilities improvements that benefit an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low- and moderate -income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements. How were these needs determined? The needs identified for public facilities in the City were determined through community meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey, and consultation with the Public Works and Engineering Services Departments. Generally, respondents to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey indicated that improvements to streets, sidewalks, curbs, drains and sewers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a high to moderate priority need. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 73 Page 205 Community Facilities 0% 20% 40% 60% 8695 100% Senior Centers Childcare Centers Youth Centers Parks Community Centers Health Care Facilities Fire Stations Libraries Accessibility Improvements Homeless Emergency Shelters High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Neec Figure 21 - Need for Additional or Improved Community Facilities Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Improvements: The City has an on-going need for public improvements and follows an annual Capital Improvement Program to meet those needs. The Capital Improvement Program includes various important programs that focus on landscaping, facilities, municipal utility, parks, railroad crossings, streets, and traffic. The Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Capital Improvement Program includes two (2) landscaping projects, 15 facility projects, five (5) municipal utility projects, nine (9) park projects, one (1) railroad crossing project, 12 street projects, seven (7) traffic projects and 10 miscellaneous projects with an overall cost of approximately $78 million. Public facilities improvements that benefit an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low- and moderate -income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements. How were these needs determined? The needs identified for public facilities in the City were determined through community meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey, and consultation with the Public Works and Engineering Services Departments. Generally, respondents to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey indicated that improvements to streets, sidewalks, curbs, drains and sewers in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are a high to moderate priority need. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 73 Page 205 Infrastructure Improvements 0% 20% 4655 6655 80% 16656 Drainage Improvement Water/Sewer Improvement Street/Alley Improvement Street Lighting - Sidewalk improvements Accessibility Improvements2 High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 22 - Need for Infrastructure Improvements Describe the jurisdiction's need for Public Services: Public service activities are consistently ranked as a high priority by residents and other stakeholders. Pursuant to CDBG regulations, only 15 percent of the City's annual grant allocation (plus 15 percent of prior year program income) can be used for public service -type activities. The City proposes to focus funds on lower-income households in order to establish, improve, and expand existing public services, such as: youth and senior services, services for victims of domestic violence, transportation and overall health services. Rancho Cucamonga residents rated anti-crime programs as a high priority in the Consolidated Plan Survey. With assistance of the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, the City is able to foster a family-oriented, safe and prosperous City. As a result of the City's partnership with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department, the City is able to provide patrol services, a full service traffic division, which includes motor units, Major Accident Investigation Team (MAIT), a commercial enforcement unit and parking enforcement unit. A Multiple Enforcement Team (MET), including Bicycle Enforcement Team (BET) provides a well-rounded community-based policing unit. In addition, the station provides six School Resource Officers (SRO) who service each of the city's high schools, middle schools and elementary schools, a crime prevention unit, a crime analysis unit and a well - diversified and experienced detective division. Since these services are budgeted from other sources of funds, the City does not anticipate using CDBG public service funds for anti-crime programs. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 74 Page 206 How were these needs determined? Public service needs are based on the City's desire to ensure that high quality services are provided to residents to maintain a high quality of life and to promote the well-being of all Rancho Cucamonga residentsparticularly low- and moderate -income residents. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation process and in consideration of the local nonprofits and City Departments offering services, the City considers public services benefitting low- and moderate -income residents a high priority in the Strategic Plan. Senior Activities Youth Activities Childcare Activities Transportation Services Anti -Crime Programs Health Care Services Mental Health Services Legal Services Community Services 0% 2095 4095 60% 80% 10095 High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 23 - Need for Community Services by type or Target Population Special Needs Services 0% 20% 4095 60% 90% 100% Centers/Services for the aisabled Domestic Violence Services Substance Abuse Services _ Homeless Services HIV/AIDS Centers and Services Neglected/Abused Children Centers and Services High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need Figure 24 - Need for Services for Special Needs Populations 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Needs Assessment 75 Page 207 Housing Market Analysis MA -05 Overview Housing Market Analysis Overview This section evaluates existing housing market conditions in Rancho Cucamonga in terms of housing supply, condition, and cost. Rancho Cucamonga's housing stock primarily consists of single-family detached residential dwellings (63 percent). A majority of the owner -occupied housing stock consists of units with three or more bedrooms (30,330 or 80 percent) and most of the rental housing stock consists of units that have two bedrooms (7,055 or 34 percent) or three bedrooms (7,300 or 35 percent). In the decade between 2010 and 2019, the median home price in Rancho Cucamonga increased by 68.6 percent from $322,000 to $543,000 and the median contract rent increased by 51.8 percent from $1,278 to $1,940 as median income decreased by one percent. As a result, Rancho Cucamonga households have become increasingly cost -burdened. CHAS data from 2015 shows that there is an insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes of less than 50 percent of AMI and for those between 80 and 100 percent of AMI. Of the 14,225 households earning 0-80 percent of AMI in the City, 11,526 are cost -burdened households — meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing. Additionally, 8,505 of the cost burdened households are considered severely cost burdened households -meaning that they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the 8,505 severely cost burdened households, 5,586 are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 4,232 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless. According to CHAS data, there is a supply of approximately 5,527 housing units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. According to Table 7, there are 14,225 households in Rancho Cucamonga that earn less than 80 percent of AMI, resulting in an estimated need for approximately 8,698 additional housing units that are affordable to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. In the last decade, the City has aggressively pursued opportunities to add to its inventory of affordable rental housing units and continues to pursue affordable housing development; however, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change impacting affordable housing and residential investment. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 76 Page 208 In light of scarce monetary resources available to create new affordable housing units and the continuing recovery of the Southern California housing market after the recent recession, housing affordability problems will become an increasingly difficult challenge to the community during the period of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 77 Page 209 MA -45 Non -Housing Community Development Assets - 91.410,91.210(f) Introduction The City places a high priority on non -housing community development needs including those associated with improving public facilities such as community center rehabilitation or ADA improvements and infrastructure improvements including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, driveway approaches, alleys and pedestrian crossings. During the implementation of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the City will use CDBG funds as to address these needs and provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate -income people. The City recognizes the need to expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income people and provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan include public service programs that support family self-sufficiency. This approach fulfills several needs in the community including housing instability and ensuring that all persons have the opportunity to succeed without regard to family economic status. Economic Development Market Analysis Business Activity 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 78 Page 210 Number- of •.less Numbe Share of Business by Se citm of Workers workers of jobs jobs % j Workers Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas Extraction 633 48 1 0 -1 Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 6,950 9,602 11 14 2 Construction 4,130 5,298 7 7 1 Education and Health Care Services 11,227 8,076 18 11 -7 Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 3,419 4,080 6 6 0 Information 1,411 422 2 1 -2 Manufacturing 5,868 10,144 9 14 5 Other Services 2,029 1,807 3 3 -1 Professional, Scientific, Management Services 4,718 4,300 8 6 -2 Public Administration 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Trade 7,485 7,844 12 11 -1 Transportation and Warehousing 3,800 4,424 6 6 0 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 78 Page 210 Table 30 - Business Activity Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS (Workers), 2015 Longitudinal Employer -Household Dynamics Qobs) Labor Force Category JUL .- Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 90,959 Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 82,215 Unemployment Rate 9.63 Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 22.61 Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 1 6.17 Table 31 - Labor Force Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS or -if JUL .- Management, business and financial 22,465 Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 3,415 Service 6,574 Sales and office 22,260 Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 5,385 Production, transportation and material moving 3,905 Table 32 — Occupations by Sector Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Travel Time ravel Time JUL .- Percen 30 Minutes 42,368 56% 30-59 Minutes 22,060 29% 60 or More Minutes 11,795 15% Total 76,223 100% Table 33 - Travel Time Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 79 Page 211 Education Table 34 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS Educational•• �JW-24 Less than 9th grade yrs 89 25-34 yrs 35-44 500 630 45-MJW 1,515 65+ 1,548 9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,460 1,160 1,360 1,920 1,443 High school graduate, GED, or alternative 5,880 5,175 4,645 8,529 4,435 Some college, no degree 8,085 6,850 6,960 14,045 4,065 Associate's degree 839 2,265 2,155 4,915 1,395 Bachelor's degree 2,199 5,480 5,328 9,191 2,714 Graduate or professional degree 50 1 3,139 1 3,635 5,455 1,325 Table 35 - Educational Attainment by Age Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS ucational Attainment Medianthe Past • Less than high school graduate 38,012 High school graduate (includes equivalency) 57,436 Some college or Associate's degree 75,144 Bachelor's degree 105,119 Graduate or professional degree 76,554 Table 36 - Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months Data Source: 2011-2015 ACS 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis Page 212 Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major employment sectors within your jurisdiction? According to 2015 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, the major employment sectors in the City of Rancho Cucamonga include Manufacturing (10,144 jobs), Arts, Entertainment, accommodations (9,602 jobs), Education and Health care Services (8,076 jobs), Retail Trade (7,844 jobs), Construction (5,298 jobs), and Professional, Scientific, Management Services (4,300 jobs). Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business community: The business community in Rancho Cucamonga relies on a highly educated workforce, starting with the Rancho Cucamonga Unified School district and continuing with colleges and universities. Rancho Cucamonga is surrounded by 22 nationally acclaimed colleges and universities within a one-half hour drive of Rancho Cucamonga. A diverse group of leading employers in management, healthcare, professional services, transportation, education, research, manufacturing and retail in Rancho Cucamonga benefit from the ever-growing opportunities and expansion that the City offers as a result of access to affordable industrial real estate. Recognizing that the business community needs a workforce that is prepared for a 21 It Century global economy, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is forward thinking and consistently focusing on change and advancement, making it an ideal place to live and work. Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce development, business support or infrastructure these changes may create. Over the past 35 years, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has created an environment that encourages entrepreneurial growth based on investments in human capital, strong partnerships between the public and private sectors, and a renewed focus on high technology manufacturing. Today, an incentive for professional, corporate, and other office firms to follow the migration of people to Rancho Cucamonga is its equally educated, yet less expensive workforce. Employees in the region are willing to work for less than in coastal areas in exchange for more affordable living, shorter commutes and a better quality of life. More specifically, the City offers an International Trade Program which assists businesses with bringing their products and services to the global marketplace. In an effort to foster relationships with local businesses and allow them the opportunity to discuss matters of importance, the City's Economic Development Group has created a Business Visitation Program. Through Rancho Advantage, an Economic Development representative will meet with company representatives to help facilitate the City's entitlement process, to speed time to market. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 81 Page 213 How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to employment opportunities in the jurisdiction? The majority of employees in the civilian labor force have a post -secondary education, which is beneficial because the fastest growing occupational sectors offer jobs that require higher education and training. Generally, the skills and education of the current workforce in Rancho Cucamonga correspond to the employment opportunities in the City. With the wide variety of job opportunities available in the City, Rancho Cucamonga's current workforce places a high importance on proximity to employment, with 56 percent of the workforce commuting less than 30 minutes to work each day according to Table 33. Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan. Chaffey College contributes to economic vitality by providing training, education and community- based programs that lead to success, employment, and positive growth. More specifically, Chaffey College provides programming and services for the CalWORKs program, which offers numerous programs including the Workforce Training program, Building Businesses program, International Development program, and the Procurement Assistance Center program. In addition, the City of Rancho Cucamonga works closely with the County of San Bernardino's Workforce Development Board (WDB) which provides oversight for the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) programs in San Bernardino County. The WDB operates comprehensive one-stop career centers, satellite offices, and mobile One -Stop (M1) that serves adult job seekers including youth ages 18 years and over, and Youth Opportunity Centers (YOC) providing a system of support for the educational and employment success of youth in the area (ages 16-21). All centers provide services to the business community. The local workforce investment area provides of the following services: • Workforce Development — Business Services: The Business Services team is comprised of professionals ready to assist County enterprises, large and small, gain a competitive advantage and navigate the complex systems of a new economy. • Labor Market Information: The business services team visits businesses identifying available employment opportunities and collecting information that can assist with job placement. Our go -to experts provide valuable information on workforce trends, in -demand occupations and high growth industries in San Bernardino County. • On-the-job Training: This free program provides eligible companies reimbursement for up to 50% of a new hire's wage while they are in training. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 82 Page 214 • Layoff Aversion: Professional experts assist companies that are at risk of closure or reduction of employees by developing successful strategies to help the business operate more efficiently while improving productivity and reducing costs. • Workshops: Available to employers, these free business workshops cover a wide range of topics, including human resources, process improvement, branding and marketing, business basics, leadership and much more. • Rapid Response: For companies experiencing downsizing, our team of professionals coordinates appropriate services, which may include on-site assessment of needed employment and training and coordination of community access to state and economic assistance. Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? Yes. The City participates with San Bernardino County in implementing their 2019-2023 Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy. If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth. The City participates in the County of San Bernardino's Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) administered through the County of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency. The CEDS Action Plan focused on strengthening locally based industries as a strategy to create employment opportunities in sustainable growth industries and attract private investment to local businesses and ventures. The following seven Economic Development Goals and Strategies as outlined in the CEDS reflect the strategy: 1. Expand job Creation 2. Improve Employment Access for Existing Residents 3. Increase Household Incomes and Wages 4. Improve Educational Attainment and Workforce Training 5. Improve Backbone Infrastructure and Broadband Access 6. Support Initiatives to Fund Backbone Infrastructure Improvements 7. Encourage Sustainable Development Business attraction is one of the core functions of the Office of Economic Development. The Economic Development Action Plan focuses on attraction of existing businesses from the targeted industries to the City and the formation of new business from entrepreneurs just starting their business. Business attraction is accomplished through the targeted marketing campaigns and positive conversations with key decision makers and influencers. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 83 Page 215 Discussion Rancho Cucamonga's location in western San Bernardino County and adjacent to Los Angeles, Orange and Riverside Counties makes it a highly desirable location for a wide variety of businesses. In addition, Rancho Cucamonga's infrastructure, focus on safety, and highly skilled workforce make it an ideal place for small and large companies to call home. In fact, Rancho Cucamonga is home to a variety of world class companies including but not limited to Frito Lay, Mission Foods, Starbucks' juice subsidiary, Evolution Fresh, and Nongshim. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis Page 216 MA -50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") Based on a review of CPD Maps, there are no specific areas of the City where multiple housing problems are concentrated. All Census tracts in the City experience cost burden to some extent. Evaluation of maps showing housing overcrowding and substandard housing did not reveal discernable concentrations, although housing overcrowding is more prevalent for extremely low-income households in the low- and moderate -income Census tract block groups. The City defines a concentration of multiple housing problems as a Census tract in which at least 50% of the households are cost burdened and more than 15% of the households experience overcrowding. One Census tract (06071002207 - located in the southeast corner of the City) meets this definition. Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of "concentration") This plan uses HUD's definition of Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) to define areas where low-income racial or ethnic minorities are concentrated. R/ECAPs are defined as areas with a non-white population of 50% or more and 40% or more of individuals living at or below the poverty line (or three or more times the average tract poverty rate for the metro area). Using the 2011-2015 ACS data, there are currently no R/ECAPs located within the City. According to Figure 19, at least 47 percent of the households in a majority of Census tracts within the low- and moderate - income areas are Hispanic with those most heavily concentrated towards the southwest region of the City. Individually, the plan defines low-income areas as Census tracts in which at least 20% of the individuals within the tract are living at or below the poverty line. There are no such Census tracts in Rancho Cucamonga that meet this definition. The plan defines areas of minority concentration as areas in which the share of the minority population is more than 20 percentage points that of the City's total minority population (60.5%). Within Rancho Cucamonga, one Census tract has a minority populations that is 80.5% or greater. This tract is located in the southwestern corner of the City (tract: 06071002101). 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 85 Page 217 What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods? With 25.8 percent of the households in the City earning less than 80 percent of the AMI, most experience high levels of housing problems due to unaffordability of housing units. Due to high costs of rent in comparison to median income, the maps revealed that the southwest region of the City experiences higher percentages of overcrowding as defined has having between 1.01 occupants per room and 1.50 occupants per room. This may be due in part to multiple families combining incomes in effort to meet the affordability of the housing stock. The housing stock is a mix of owner -occupied single -unit detached dwellings and renter -occupied dwellings ranging from single -unit detached to apartment complexes with 20 or more units. Owner -occupied units generally have three or more bedrooms and renter -occupied units range from one to three bedrooms with most units having two bedrooms. Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods? There are numerous community assets in the low- and moderate -income target area, including: • West Point Medical Center • San Bernardino County Workforce Center • RC Family Resource Center • Bear Gulch Park • Los Amigos Park • Red Hill Community Park • Lions Community Center and Lions Park The City of Rancho Cucamonga has the James L. Brulte Senior Center which serves as a resource to help direct seniors to valuable outside resources and programs and also offers high quality programming to enrich the lives of seniors, including educational classes, exercise programs, art education, health promotion, transportation, counseling and support functions. Additionally, the City has the RC Sports Center, a dedicated facility for youth, hosts a variety of youth programs. Parks and recreational facilities serve an important role in a community. They provide opportunities for resident interaction and improve the overall aesthetic of a neighborhood. During the implementation of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, CDBG funds can be used to provide for the rehabilitation of facilities or buildings used primarily for recreation and develop open spaces that will serve low to moderate -income areas. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has 30 parks, including eleven softball/baseball fields, eleven basketball courts, fourteen soccer/football fields, three volleyball courts, three tennis courts and seventeen playgrounds. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 86 Page 218 MA -60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate -Income Households - 91.210(a) (4), 91.310(a) (2) Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households, including low- and moderate -income households and neighborhoods. Throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga, residents have consistent and multiple options to access broadband, high-speed Internet. For broadband download speeds of 25 megabytes per second (mbps), 100 percent of households are covered by at least three internet service providers. For download speeds of at least 100 mbps, 30.2 percent of households are covered by three providers, 47.8 percent of households are covered by two providers and 22 percent of households are covered by one provider. According to broadbandnow, the average download speed in Rancho Cucamonga is 60.8 mbps, which is 100 percent faster than the average internet speed in California. The three primary internet service providers in Rancho Cucamonga are Spectrum, Frontier and UTA. Rancho Cucamonga complies with HUD's Narrowing the Digital Divide Through Installation of Broadband Infrastructure in HUD -Funded New Construction and Substantial Rehabilitation of Multifamily Rental Housing (81 FR 92626) rule (effective January 19, 2017). Through this rule, all new HUD - funded multi -family construction or substantial rehabilitation has included broadband infrastructure including cables, fiber optics, wiring and wireless connectivity to ensure that each unit has the infrastructure to achieve at least 25 mbps download and 3 mbps upload speeds. Figure 25 - Number of Residential Broadband Providers Data Source: FCC Broadband Provider Coverage (Dec. 2018) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis 87 Page 219 Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction. A number of broadband and internet service providers operate in the City. This helps with increased competition in pricing and types of services offered to low- and moderate -income neighborhoods. Of those who participated in the community outreach survey, 92% indicated that they had access to broadband internet. 38 percent of the respondents indicated that they spend more than $75 per month for service, while 16 percent spent less than $50 per month. There were some respondents, who believed that the City should allow more internet service providers in the area to reduce the costs. Even though only eight percent of the respondents did not have internet service, the cost for this service could be cost prohibitive on fixed incomes. The public library, senior center and the City's community centers have computers and internet access for the public who could not otherwise afford the service. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis Page 220 MA -65 Hazard Mitigation - 91.210(a)(5), 91.310(a)(3) Describe the jurisdiction's increased natural hazard risks associated with climate change. Climate change has increased the prevalence and severity of natural hazard risks including, drought, flash floods / storms, and extreme heat events in Rancho Cucamonga. To help counter the impact of these risks, the City adopted its Sustainable Community Action Plan in 2017 and complies with CAL Green building standards. Through both of these initiatives, the City set a course towards achieving environmental sustainability by promoting green building, reducing water usage / storm water runoff, improving energy efficiency of residential properties, and encouraging alternative transportation. Two areas are within the 100 -year floodplain and at a greater risk for experiencing flooding events. They include the northern region near Etiwanda Falls and a smaller area near Day Creek Channel. Additionally, the Etiwanda district within the City of Rancho Cucamonga exhibits a 0.2 percent chance of an annual flood of less than one foot. Describe the vulnerability to these risks of housing occupied by low- and moderate -income households based on an analysis of data, findings, and methods. Low- and moderate -income residents and special needs populations are especially vulnerable to the risks of climate -related hazard risks. The residences of low- and moderate -income households are more often in worse condition and thus are more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Most of the lower-income households are not in areas at risk of wildfires or flooding. Although not affected by climate change, the greatest concern is earthquakes, which would affect low - and moderate -income households since much of the housing units were constructed prior to current building standards. 52 percent of the survey respondents did not feel adequately prepared for a natural disaster such as earthquakes and wildfires. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has developed a disaster preparedness strategy which provides essential tips on what to do before, during and after natural disasters. This comprehensive booklet includes emergency kit checklists, evacuation route maps, as well as shelter information. For more information, this resource can be accessed at the following location: haps: / /www.cityofrc.us /sites /default/ files /2019-08 /ReadYRCRevisedMarch2017.pdf 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Market Analysis Page 221 Strategic Plan SP -05 Overview Strategic Plan Overview The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City to established its housing and community development priority needs and strategies for the investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) over the next five years, beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2025. The priority needs and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information including the results of the City's 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) 5 -Year Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same time period. Additional sources of information used to identify needs, establish priorities, and set goals were obtained through consultation with local stakeholders and nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to children, families, elderly persons, persons at -risk for and experiencing homelessness, and persons with special needs throughout the community. In consideration of community input and available data, the five (5) priority needs listed below are established as part of this Strategic Plan. • Preserve the supply of affordable housing • Equal access to housing opportunities • Public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Improve public facilities and infrastructure • Address barriers to accessibility Consistent with HUD's national goals for the CDBG programs to provide decent housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, the priority needs listed above will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG funded activities aligned with the following four measurable Strategic Plan goals: 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 90 Page 222 Table 37 - Strategic Plan Summary Historically, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has used CDBG programs to fund nonprofit agencies that provide direct program services to Rancho Cucamonga residents. Over the next five years, the City will continue this emphasis and will also use these resources to support programs and activities implemented by City Departments that support the goals and objectives of this Strategic Plan. The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and community development activities to be funded over the next five years: • High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are expected to be funded during the 2020-2024 period. • Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five-year goal outcome indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 91 Page 223 Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome Indicator 1. Fair Housing Affordable • Equal access to 2,000 people Services Housing housing opportunities 2. Public Services Non -Housing • Public services for 5,000 people Community low- and moderate - Development income residents 3. Affordable Affordable • Preserve the supply 100 owner housing Housing Housing of affordable housing units Preservation 4. Public Facilities and Non -Housing • Improve public 15 public facilities Infrastructure Community facilities and Improvements Development infrastructure • Address barriers to accessibility 25,000 people Table 37 - Strategic Plan Summary Historically, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has used CDBG programs to fund nonprofit agencies that provide direct program services to Rancho Cucamonga residents. Over the next five years, the City will continue this emphasis and will also use these resources to support programs and activities implemented by City Departments that support the goals and objectives of this Strategic Plan. The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and community development activities to be funded over the next five years: • High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are expected to be funded during the 2020-2024 period. • Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five-year goal outcome indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 91 Page 223 SP -10 Geographic Priorities - 91.415, 91.215(a)(1) Geographic Area Table 38 - Geographic Priority Areas General Allocation Priorities According to data from the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates in HUD's eCon Planning Suite for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the City's household median income is $77,396. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning and Development mapping system (CPD Maps) reveals that approximately 13 of the Census tracts in the City of Rancho Cucamonga are at or below 80 percent of the City's median household income are concentrated in the southern part of the City. The lower median income levels in the southern region may be attributed to the high density of area median home values of $321,800 or less being also located in the southern area of the City. Based on evaluation of CPD Maps data, there are no areas within the City exhibiting a greater level of need for affordable housing or services for low- and moderate -income residents. Therefore, no geographic priorities are established within the Consolidated Plan and allocation priorities will be driven by citywide need. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 92 Page 224 CDBG - LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA MAP LEGEND: CITY BOUNDARY LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS CENSUS TRACK BLOCK GROUP ACS Data - Lnwmad no �ez xz..bw 0°0615 3 I<.x% 001311 1 xo.3Y 020.22 oozu» ooabl3 z 3x1% - ooxbE3 1 9.9Y 023.04 boxbl. x 13.x% B.G,1 BG -2 9olevs 5v..x 003016 f 36.6% aolwb u.ix oozbn x 9.ox °oso e 1 s.ex B.G.1 oox6v9 1 zbwx 00!019 3 ie.6% ombn e sae 923.37 0.3: B.G.3 5' A% °• oozbn z z..x 00101) 3 3e.px n eplOE9 1 36.1% 00➢0➢9 3 11.0% oox6x9 3 11.6% ooxbx9 . msx $ 00!031 3 3x.9% ooxou A 13.e% 6°x63s 3 u.9x aozloi z �sss oozxo3 z Ao..% oouo) sb�3x e0z1°) 3 OOE130 xmlx •P�dw Gxanvpa banlErcwfm CwniraF � fY x3lAE t9{WnlhhwnE°9-3➢.A➢% Figure 26 - CDBG Low -Mod Census Block Groups 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 93 Page 225 BG2 6.G1 020 .21 - B.G.2 020.17 1 - B,G 1 920.11 B.G. i 024.14 9za1s _029.19 B.G.2 BG,2 A.G. R.G.1 020.13 B G.2 BG z 020.21 BQ 112 B.G.2 B.1.4 1G.1 BG -2 B12 xns B ,G.1 B� 02p.23 020.25 920.29 B.G.2 020.31 020.33 20.15 B.G.3 8:0.3 e.: B G.'. B.G.1 BG.I 020.35 5,G.1 E.G,1 BG2 EG.2 RG.2 BG,1 098.12 020.16 29.27 20.28 G't_ 20.34' BG 20.36 BG.3 B.G.2 B,G.1 m B.G.1 B.G.1 BIG 2 1.1.2 - B.G 2 021.03 BG 3 021.07 1 021.01 5G.1 e, B.G.1 021. 05 021.10 - 022.97 - -- _ BG 1 013.11 BG.1 cA,Ai,M➢ City of Rancho Cucamonga CDBG - LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA MAP LEGEND: CITY BOUNDARY LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS CENSUS TRACK BLOCK GROUP ACS Data - Lnwmad no �ez xz..bw 0°0615 3 I<.x% 001311 1 xo.3Y 020.22 oozu» ooabl3 z 3x1% - ooxbE3 1 9.9Y 023.04 boxbl. x 13.x% B.G,1 BG -2 9olevs 5v..x 003016 f 36.6% aolwb u.ix oozbn x 9.ox °oso e 1 s.ex B.G.1 oox6v9 1 zbwx 00!019 3 ie.6% ombn e sae 923.37 0.3: B.G.3 5' A% °• oozbn z z..x 00101) 3 3e.px n eplOE9 1 36.1% 00➢0➢9 3 11.0% oox6x9 3 11.6% ooxbx9 . msx $ 00!031 3 3x.9% ooxou A 13.e% 6°x63s 3 u.9x aozloi z �sss oozxo3 z Ao..% oouo) sb�3x e0z1°) 3 OOE130 xmlx •P�dw Gxanvpa banlErcwfm CwniraF � fY x3lAE t9{WnlhhwnE°9-3➢.A➢% Figure 26 - CDBG Low -Mod Census Block Groups 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 93 Page 225 SP -25 Priority Needs - 91.415, 91.215(a)(2) Priority Needs 1 Priority Need Preserve the supply of affordable housing Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate Geographic Citywide Areas Associated Affordable Housing Preservation Goals Description As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of concern for low- and moderate -income homeowners who are generally not in a financial position to properly maintain their homes. The age and condition of Rancho Cucamonga's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air- conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. According to CHAS data showing the year that housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure: • 12,422 or 36 percent of the 34,377 owner -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built 40 or more years ago (built prior to 1980) • 21,955 or 64 percent of the 34,377 owner -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built between 20 and 40 years ago (built between 1980 and 1999) • 4,929 or 24 percent of the 20,864 renter -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built 40 or more years ago (built prior to 1980) • 15,935 or 76 percent of the 20,864 renter -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built between 20 and 40 years ago (built between 1980 and 1999) 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 94 Page 226 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 95 Page 227 Basis for Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units Relative occupied by low- and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to Priority invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community. Housing preservation is rated as a high priority need based on the demand for service reported by the City's Planning Department and responses to the 2020- 2024 Consolidated Plan Survey indicating that housing rehabilitation is a priority for residents. 2 Priority Need Equal access to housing opportunities Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate; Middle; Large Families; Families with Children; Elderly; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities; Persons with HIV/AIDS and their Families; Veterans; Persons designated as a protected class Geographic Citywide Areas Associated Fair Housing Services Goals Description All recipients of federal housing and community development assistance such as CDBG must take actions to affirmatively further fair housing choice within their communities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will certify its compliance with HUD's requirement to affirmatively further fair housing choice in each Annual Action Plan requesting an annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City will contract with a third -party organization with expertise in counseling residents and real estate industry professionals about their rights and responsibilities under the law. The types of services needed include individual counseling for low- and moderate -income Rancho Cucamonga residents concerning their rights and responsibilities under the Fair Housing Act; community workshops to facilitate greater understanding of the law; monitoring for discriminatory advertisements in the private sector; advocacy on behalf of residents seeking reasonable modifications/accommodations; and monitoring of data to detect unfair lending practices. Basis for Affirmatively furthering fair housing choice by ensuring equal access to housing Relative opportunities is a high priority for HUD and the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Priority In accordance with HUD requirements, this priority will be addressed using CDBG Administration funds. 3 Priority Need Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents Name Priority Level High Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate; Homeless or at -risk of becoming homeless 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 95 Page 227 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 96 Page 228 Geographic Citywide Areas Associated Public Services Goals Description According to 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates data, there are 14,225 low- and moderate -income households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Consultation with organizations that provide a range of public services targeted to low- and moderate -income residents revealed the need for public services addressing a variety of needs including those associated with health, fitness, nutrition, affordable childcare, affordable housing, education, transportation and recreation for children, youth, families and seniors living in Rancho Cucamonga. Analysis of available data and consultation with organizations providing services for special needs populations revealed a high need for a range of additional services including, but not limited to, those concerned with providing support for the homelessness or at -risk of becoming homeless, victims of domestic violence. Basis for The City of Rancho Cucamonga Strategic Plan calls for a range of services for Relative low- and moderate -income residents as a high priority of the City. The services Priority needed include youth and senior services, services for victims of domestic violence, transportation and overall health services. The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey rated youth and senior activities, childcare, transportation, and supportive services for seniors among the high needs for public services. 4 Priority Need Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure Name Priority Level High Population Non -housing Community Development Geographic Citywide Areas Associated Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goals 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 96 Page 228 Table 39 - Priority Needs Summary 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 97 Page 229 Description The City of Rancho Cucamonga annual Capital Improvements Program establishes the public facilities and improvements needs of the City's parks and recreational facilities, including general improvements and accessibility improvements. Consultation with nonprofit community partners revealed the need for investment in facilities serving low-income residents and residents with special needs, such as childcare centers, parks, health facilities, and facilities for victims of domestic violence. Basis for Based on need and available resources and results of the 2020-2024 Relative Consolidated Plan Survey, the improvement of public facilities and Priority infrastructure is rated as a high priority need for CDBG funds. 5 Priority Need Address barriers to accessibility Name Priority Level High Population Non -housing Community Development Geographic Citywide Areas Associated Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goals Description Assessments of City public facilities prepared by the City of Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Department revealed a need for the installation of accessibility features to ensure that public buildings are accessible to all persons. Barriers to accessibility were identified at various public facilities, including but not limited to, building entrances that are not wheelchair accessible, service counters that are not wheelchair accessible, lack of ADA compliant door hardware, restrooms lacking wheelchair accessible lavatories, fixtures and ADA compliant water closets, ramps and steps lacking ADA compliant handrails, drinking fountains that are not wheelchair accessible and non -ADA compliant signage. Basis for Based on need and available resources and results of the 2020-2024 Relative Consolidated Plan Survey, the improvement of public facilities and Priority infrastructure owned and operated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga is rated as a high priority need for CDBG funds. Table 39 - Priority Needs Summary 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 97 Page 229 SP -35 Anticipated Resources - 91.420(b), 91.215(a)(4), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025, the City of Rancho Cucamonga anticipates investing an estimated $5.1 million of CDBG funds to support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG funds is subject to federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD's formulas for each respective program. Anticipated Resources CDBG Public Housing 1,028,131 0 401,405 1,429,536 4,112,524 Based on Federal Public Services 2020 FY Public allocation Improvements from HUD. Admin and Planning Table 40 - Anticipated Resources Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied To address housing and community development needs in Rancho Cucamonga, the City will leverage its CDBG grant with other Federal, state, and local resources as documented below in order to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. The City's former Redevelopment Agency was the primary non-federal source of leveraged funds. With the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency, the City's ability to leverage federal funds has been substantially reduced. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 98 Page 230 Federal Resources • Continuum of Care (CoC) Program • HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) • Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) • Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) • Youthbuild • Federal Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program State Resources • State Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program • Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program • Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) • Housing Related Parks Grant • CaIHFA Single and Multi -Family Program • Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding Local Resources • San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership (SBCHP) • Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) • Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) Funding • San Bernardino County Continuum of Care Program Private Resources • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Community Reinvestment Act Programs • United Way Funding • Private Contributions Matching Requirements The City of Rancho Cucamonga does not receive HOME funds as part of its entitlement allocation. The amount of matching, is therefore, not applicable for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 99 Page 231 If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan The City does not currently own any publicly owned land or property that may be used to address the affordable housing needs of the Consolidated Plan. Rancho Cucamonga will comply new State requirements under AB1486 and AB1255 to inventory and support developers access and utilize surplus municipal and state land for the construction of affordable housing. If such sites are identified, the City will consider the use of CDBG or other resources to assist with site preparation. Discussion Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG programs, the City expects to utilize $5,140,655 of CDBG funds during the five-year period beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2024 to achieve the goals of the Strategic Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 100 Page 232 SP -40 Institutional Delivery Structure - 91.415, 91.215 (k) Explain the institutional structure through which the jurisdiction will carry out its consolidated plan including private industry, non-profit organizations, and public institutions. Table 41 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System The institutional delivery system in Rancho Cucamonga is high -functioning and collaborative particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 101 Page 233 Responsible Entity Geographic Area Flesponsible Entity .- Role Served City of Rancho Government Planning and Jurisdiction Cucamonga — Planning Administration Department City of Rancho Government Public Services Jurisdiction Cucamonga — City Manager's Office City of Rancho Government Public Services Jurisdiction Cucamonga — Community Services Department City of Rancho Government Public Facilities and Jurisdiction Cucamonga — Public Infrastructure Works Department Improvements Inland Fair Housing Subrecipient Fair Housing Services Jurisdiction and Mediation Board County of San Government HOME Consortium Region Bernardino San Bernardino Government Continuum of Care Region County Homeless Partnership Housing Authority of Government Public Housing Region the County of San Authority Bernardino Table 41 - Institutional Delivery Structure Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System The institutional delivery system in Rancho Cucamonga is high -functioning and collaborative particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 101 Page 233 Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV and mainstream services Homelessness Prevention Services Available in the Targeted to . Homeless ess Prevention Services Targeted to People Counseling/Advocacy X Legal Assistance X Mortgage Assistance Rental Assistance X X Utilities Assistance X StreetOutreach Services Law Enforcement X Mobile Clinics Other Street Outreach Services X Supportive X Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X Child Care X Education X X Employment and Employment Training X Healthcare X HIV/AIDS X Life Skills X Mental Health Counseling X Transportation X Table 42 - Homeless Prevention Services Summary Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) The City of Rancho Cucamonga Is public service programs will focus on the provision of services to address the needs of homeless persons as well as those at -risk of becoming homeless through the CDBG Public Service Grants awarded to local nonprofit service providers. The City is using Public Service activities to address many priority needs, one of which includes providing wrap around services to households experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness. Further, the City will partner and collaborate with the County CoC to ensure homeless residents are aware of and able to access county -wide services and facilities to provide critical housing and supportive services. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 102 Page 234 Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but not limited to, the services listed above Rancho Cucamonga has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and private sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant programs is no exception. Communication and cooperation between the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department and the partner agencies and organizations that administer activities is strong. City staff continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery. The single most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of available funding to support local programs in Rancho Cucamonga for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, although several new State programs have been created to assist in addressing this challenge. In addition, the City partners closely with the County CoC to address these needs at a regional level. Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address priority needs To address the lack of resources necessary to support local programs in Rancho Cucamonga for special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City is using Public Service activities to address many priority needs, one of which includes providing wrap around services to households experiencing or at risk of experiencing homelessness. Further, the City will partner and collaborate with the County CoC to ensure homeless residents are aware of and able to access county -wide services and facilities to provide critical housing and supportive services. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 103 Page 235 SP -45 Goals - 91.415, 91.215(a)(4) Goals Summary Information Sort • Goal Start - n Geographic - Needs,7Addressed unding Goal Outcome Indicator .- 1 Fair Housing 2020 2024 Affordable Citywide Ensure equal access $100,000 Other: Services Housing to housing opportunities 2,000 persons 2 Public Services 2020 2024 Non -Housing Citywide Public services for $595,000 Public service activities other Community low- and moderate- than Low/Mod Income Development income residents Housing Benefit: 5,000 persons 3 Affordable Housing 2020 2024 Affordable Citywide Preserve the supply $2,000,000 Homeowner housing Preservation Housing of affordable rehabilitation: 100 Housing housing Units 4 Public Facilities and 2020 2024 Non -Housing Citywide Improve public $1,517,525 Public facility or Infrastructure Community facilities and infrastructure activities Improvements Development infrastructure other than Low/Mod Income Housing Benefit: Address material 25,000 people barriers to accessibility Table 43 - Goals Summary 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 104 Page 236 Goal Descriptions 1 Goal Name Fair Housing Services Goal Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination Description and landlord -tenant mediation services. The CDBG Administration activity funding for five years is also represented under this goal. 2 Goal Name Public Services Goal Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents including but not limited to those concerned with Description food, essential services, transportation, health, recreation and employment. 3 Goal Name Affordable Housing Preservation Goal Preserve the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households through Description housing rehabilitation activities. 4 Goal Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goal Improve City of Rancho Cucamonga public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income people Description or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as elderly people and disabled adults as well as residents of low- and moderate -income housing. This strategy includes the installation of infrastructure in support of affordable housing. Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and moderate -income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2) The City does not anticipate creating any housing units for extremely low-income, low-income and moderate -income families during the 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan period. The City does not anticipate using CDBG funds to acquire, or subsidize the purchase of housing units for homeownership. Any affordable housing that is made available will be done using other local, state or federal funds. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 105 Page 237 SP -65 Lead-based Paint Hazards - 91.415, 91.215(i) Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without LBP hazards The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. This strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older housing from lead hazards. Overall, nearly one third of all housing units in the City were built prior to 1980. This total can be used as a proxy for units at -risk of containing lead-based paint since the lead-based paint ban went into effect in 1978. In these units, the best way to have reasonable assurance that lead-based paint hazards are not present is to have the painted surfaces tested. According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Housing Improvement Program, a typical lead-based paint testing and risk assessment report costs approximately $110. To reduce lead-based paint hazards, the City of Rancho Cucamonga takes the following actions: • Include lead testing and abatement procedures if necessary in all housing rehabilitation activities for units built prior to January 1, 1978. • Monitor the lead -poisoning data maintained by the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health (SBDPH). According to SBDPH, there were 51 incidents of individuals with blood lead levels greater than 5 micrograms per deciliter from 2015-2018. • Educate residents on the health hazards of lead-based paint through the use of brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood -lead levels. • Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board and the City's housing rehabilitation activities. How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning and hazards? Over time, the actions listed above will promote greater awareness of the hazards of lead-based paint to children and will also address unsafe housing conditions in pre -1978 units where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards. How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and procedures? The City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program Implementation Guidelines require the dissemination of brochures provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to all applicants as part of the transmittal of the program application. Any unit receiving assistance through the program that was built prior to January 1, 1978 is tested for lead-based paint. If lead-based paint is 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 106 Page 238 present, appropriate abatement procedures are implemented as part of the rehabilitation contract consistent with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 107 Page 239 SP -70 Anti -Poverty Strategy - 91.415, 91.215(j) Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of Poverty - Level Families Similar to other communities in San Bernardino County and across the nation, poverty continues to be a significant challenge. According to the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates data, there are 14,225 low- and moderate -income Rancho Cucamonga households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Data further indicates that 8.8 percent of residents are below the poverty level. In an effort to meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2020-2024 Strategic Plan are aligned to support activities that promote the availability of affordable housing and provide services that directly benefit low- and moderate -income residents. In the implementation of the Plan, the City will prioritize funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years. This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency. The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by: • Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income households; • Supporting public services for low- and moderate -income residents including those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG Public Grants; and • Supporting activities that improve infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate- income residents of Rancho Cucamonga. In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide pathways out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi -Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan Page 240 How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies coordinated with this affordable housing plan Rancho Cucamonga's desirable location in San Bernardino County is a high-cost housing area. Although housing costs temporarily declined and became more affordable during the recent economic recession. National funding limitations on Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and long application wait lists for both conventional public housing and publicly assisted affordable housing limit the number of families in poverty that can benefit from these housing opportunities or programs. The goals of this Strategic Plan are aligned to benefit low- and moderate -income residents in an effort to reduce the number of poverty -level families. For example, the Affordable Housing Preservation goal will include activities targeted to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards. Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate -income families to maintain housing stability while also guaranteeing that all economic segments of the community live in decent housing. The public services goal will fund activities targeted to families in poverty and other low- and moderate -income households with specific service needs. Providing this range of targeted services allows all low- and moderate -income Rancho Cucamonga residents appropriate support and resources to rise from poverty and become more self-sufficient. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 109 Page 241 SP -80 Monitoring - 91.230 Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved, including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning requirements To ensure that CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable regulations, the City provides technical assistance to new subrecipients at the beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program year. Technical Assistance To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) workshop to review the Plan goals, program requirements and available resources with potential applicants. Subsequent to the approval of the Annual Action Plan, City staff reviews program regulations in detail with any subrecipients and City Departments to provide useful forms and resources for documenting compliance and to review the City's compliance procedures and requirements. Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as -needed basis throughout a program year. Activity Monitoring All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds, eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage, Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and relocation regulations, as applicable. Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are reviewed with the applicant. Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public service, an on-site monitoring is conducted once every two (2) years, or more frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and programmatic review of the subrecipient's activities. The reviews determine if the subrecipient is complying with the program regulations and City contract. Areas routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the results of 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan 110 Page 242 the review and any findings of non-compliance and the required corrective action. Subrecipients and City departments normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided, as noted above, as soon as compliance concerns are identified. For CDBG capital projects, monitoring also includes compliance with regulatory agreement requirements. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Strategic Plan Page 243 Expected Resources AP -15 Expected Resources - 91.42O(b), 91.22O(c)(1,2) Introduction The projects and activities included in the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan are based on resources that are anticipated to be available to the City from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. The City will receive $1,028,131 of CDBG funds from HUD. When combined with prior year available resources, the City anticipates allocating $1,429,536 of CDBG funds during program year 2020-2021. Anticipated Resources CDBG Public Housing 1,028,131 0 401,405 1,429,536 4,112,524 Based on Federal Public Services 2020 FY Public allocation Improvements from HUD. Admin and Planning Table 44 - Expected Resources — Priority Table Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied To address housing and community development needs in Rancho Cucamonga, the City will leverage its CDBG grant with other Federal, state, and local resources as documented below in order to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. The City's former Redevelopment Agency was the primary non-federal source of leveraged funds. With the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency, the City's ability to leverage federal funds has been substantially reduced. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 112 Page 244 Federal Resources • Continuum of Care (CoC) Program • HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) • Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) • Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) • Youthbuild • Federal Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program State Resources • State Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program • Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program • Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) • Housing Related Parks Grant • CaIHFA Single and Multi -Family Program • Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding Local Resources • San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership (SBCHP) • Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) • Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) Funding • San Bernardino County Continuum of Care Program Private Resources • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Community Reinvestment Act Programs • United Way Funding • Private Contributions Matching Requirements The city of Rancho Cucamonga does not receive HOME funds as part of its entitlement allocation. The amount of matching, is therefore, not applicable for the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 113 Page 245 If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan The City does not currently own any publicly owned land or property that may be used to address the affordable housing needs of the Consolidated Plan. In December 2011, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This negatively impacted affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, the available resources for affordable housing are scarce. Land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. Discussion Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG programs, the City expects to utilize approximately $5.1 million of CDBG funds and program income during the five-year period beginning July 1, 2020 and ending June 30, 2025 to achieve the goals of the Strategic Plan. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 114 Page 246 Annual Goals and Objectives AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Table 45 — Goals Summary 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 115 Page 247 G al Name Start Y ;,,tegory Geographic ir Area Needs Addressed 1 Fair Housing 2020 2021 Affordable Citywide Ensure equal access $20,000 Other: 400 people Services Housing to housing opportunities 2 Public Services 2020 2021 Non -Housing Citywide Public services for $119,000 Public service activities Community low- and moderate- other than Low/Mod Development income residents Income Housing Benefit: 1,000 people 3 Affordable Housing 2020 2021 Affordable Citywide Preserve the supply $400,000 Homeowner housing Preservation Housing of affordable rehabilitation: 20 Housing housing Units 4 Public Facilities and 2020 2021 Non -Housing Citywide Improve public $704,910 Public facility or Infrastructure Community facilities and infrastructure activities Improvements Development infrastructure other than Low/Mod Income Housing Benefit: Address material 5,000 people barriers to accessibility Table 45 — Goals Summary 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 115 Page 247 Goal Descriptions 1 Goal Name Fair Housing Services Goal Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination Description and landlord -tenant mediation services. The CDBG Administration activity funding for five years is also represented under this goal. 2 Goal Name Public Services Goal Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents including senior citizens, families and youth including Description but not limited to those concerned with food, essential services, transportation, health, recreation and employment. 3 Goal Name Affordable Housing Preservation Goal Preserve the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households through Description housing rehabilitation activities. 4 Goal Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goal Improve City of Rancho Cucamonga public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income people Description or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as elderly people and disabled adults as well as residents of low- and moderate -income housing. This strategy includes the installation of infrastructure in support of affordable housing. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 116 Page 248 AP -35 Projects - 91.420,91.220(d) Introduction To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will invest CDBG funds in projects that provide fair housing services and provide service to low- and moderate -income residents, preserve affordable housing and improve City public facilities. Together, these projects will address the needs of low- and moderate -income Rancho Cucamonga residents. Table 46 — Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG funds for program year 2020-2021 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people throughout the City. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low-income residents. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2020-2021 Action Plan in projects that provide loans to low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements, provide public services to low- and moderate -income people, projects that rehabilitate public facilities and infrastructure. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 117 Page 249 .M 1 CDBG Administration 2 Fair Housing Services 3 Public Services 4 Affordable Housing Preservation 5 Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Table 46 — Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG funds for program year 2020-2021 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people throughout the City. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low-income residents. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2020-2021 Action Plan in projects that provide loans to low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements, provide public services to low- and moderate -income people, projects that rehabilitate public facilities and infrastructure. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 117 Page 249 AP -38 Project Summary Project Summary Information 1 Project Name CDBG Administration Target Area Citywide Goals Supported All Needs Addressed All Funding CDBG: $185,626 Description Administration services of the CDBG program. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Not applicable. Location Description 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Planned Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: CDBG Administration - $185,626 2 Project Name Fair Housing Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Fair Housing Services Needs Addressed Ensure equal access to housing opportunities Funding CDBG: $20,000 Description Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination, and landlord -tenant mediation services. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 400 people will benefit from this activity. Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board: Fair Housing Services (400 people) - $20,000 3 Project Name Public Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Public Services Needs Addressed Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents Funding CDBG: $119,000 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 118 Page 250 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 119 Page 251 Description Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents including senior citizens, families and youth including but not limited to those concerned with food, essential services, transportation, health and domestic violence services. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and Approximately 1,000 people will benefit from the proposed type of families that will activity. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Bringing Health Home (60 people) -$17,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: CASA (150 people) - $12,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Food Bank (400 people) - $15,000 YMCA: Senior Transportation (120 people) - $20,000 House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services (100 people) - $10,000 Family Service Association: Senior Nutrition (525 people) - $15,000 Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk (75 people) - $7,500 Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Project (5 people) - $7,500 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization (275 people) - $15,000 4 Project Name Affordable Housing Preservation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Affordable Housing Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $400,000 Description The City has an existing Home Improvement Program geared towards the preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 119 Page 251 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 120 Page 252 Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and Approximately 20 low- and moderate -income families will type of families that will benefit from the proposed activity. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: Home Improvement Program (20 household housing units) - $400,000 5 Project Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Needs Addressed Improve public facilities and infrastructure; Address material barriers to accessibility Funding CDBG: $704,910 Description Improve City of Rancho Cucamonga public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income such as the elderly and disabled adults. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and Approximately 5,000 low- and moderate -income residents will type of families that will benefit from the proposed activity. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities City of Rancho Cucamonga: School Crosswalk Improvement - $83,500 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements - $7,200 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pecan Ave Street Improvements - $303,505 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements - $7,200 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Street Improvements - $303,505 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 120 Page 252 AP -50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420,91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low- income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed Based on evaluation of CPD Maps data, there are no areas within the City exhibiting a greater level of need for affordable housing or services for low- and moderate -income residents and allocation priorities will be driven by citywide need. All CDBG funds will be directed toward activities benefitting low- and moderate -income residents citywide. The only exception to this approach would be for CDBG projects that are qualified on a low- and moderate -income area basis where a specific proportion of the residents within the service area must be low- and moderate -income residents, such as public facilities and infrastructure improvements. Geographic Distribution q Farp= Percentage of Funds 1 Citywide 100% Table 47 - Geographic Distribution Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically For the 2020-2021 program year, the City's investments in Fair Housing Services, Public Services, and Affordable Housing Preservation are based on a citywide geography because individuals in need of these services may live anywhere within the jurisdiction—particularly services for seniors with needed assistance and victims of domestic violence. Discussion Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG funds for program year 2020-2021 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 121 Page 253 AP -55 Affordable Housing - 91.420,91.220(g) Introduction As stated in the Consolidated Plan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue its efforts to leverage other funding sources such as the Low -Income Tax Credit program and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 202 and 811 for the Elderly Program to address the local housing needs identified below. Expand the Supply of Affordable Housing Based on evaluation of 2011-2015 American Community Survey (ACS) and Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, there is a need for additional rental housing units affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Of the 14,225 households earning 0-80 percent of AMI in the City, 11,526 are cost -burdened households — meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing. Additionally, 8,505 of the cost burdened households are considered severely cost burdened households -meaning that they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the 8,505 severely cost burdened households, 5,586 are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter households, 4,232 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless. The city will continue to use the Low -Income Tax Credit program and other available options to create additional affordable housing. For instance, the Low -Income Tax credit program provided for expansion of Villa Pacifica to develop 60 new senior apartments as well as the development of Day Creek Villas consisting of 144 senior apartments. Preserve the Supply of Affordable Housing As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of particular concern for low- and moderate - income homeowners who are generally not in a financial position to properly maintain their homes. The age and condition of Rancho Cucamonga's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 15 years of age will exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. Housing over 30 years of age will typically require some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. According to CHAS data showing the year that housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure: 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 122 Page 254 • 12,422 or 36 percent of the 34,377 owner -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built 40 or more years ago (built prior to 1980) • 21,955 or 64 percent of the 34,377 owner -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built between 20 and 40 years ago (built between 1980 and 1999) • 4,929 or 24 percent of the 20,864 renter -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built 40 or more years ago (built prior to 1980) • 15,935 or 76 percent of the 20,864 renter -occupied housing units in Rancho Cucamonga were built between 20 and 40 years ago (built between 1980 and 1999) Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low- and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community. Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities ensures that all economic segments of the community have the opportunity to live in decent housing that meets local standards. Housing preservation is rated as a high priority need based on the demand for service reported by the City's Planning Department and responses to the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Survey. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported •-- 1 Non -Homeless 1 Special-Needs1 Acquisition of Existing Units •. 1 Table 48 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement ThroughOne Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 20 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 20 Table 49 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion The Strategic Plan identifies a high priority need to preserve the supply of affordable housing. During the 2020-2021 Program Year, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will invest CDBG funds in the preservation of existing affordable housing units. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 123 Page 255 AP -60 Public Housing - 91.420,91.220(h) Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga is within the service area of the Housing Authority of the County of San Bernardino (HACSB) for the purposes of Section 8 and Public Housing. According to HACSB's 2018 Annual Report, there are 315 Section 8 vouchers currently in use in Rancho Cucamonga. In addition, there are six units that are part of the Housing Partners I, Inc.'s portfolio. In the upcoming five years, HACSB plans to focus efforts on rehabilitating and preserving existing housing units and continuing existing programs and activities. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing During the 2020-2021 program year, HACSB will continue providing housing and public services to existing residents of HUD Public Housing units and HACSB-owned affordable housing units. To enhance the quality of HUD Public Housing units, HACSB anticipates completing the process of converting its original 1,215 HUD Public Housing units currently under HACSB's management and control to Section 8 units as part of HUD's Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program. Additionally, in February 2019, HACSB opened enrollment for its waitlist for tenant -based rental assistance (Section 8) units. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership HACSB encourages residents to be actively involved in the community and in the management of public housing developments through resident councils and numerous opportunities for feedback such as community meetings and surveys. The HACSB and the City of Rancho Cucamonga also actively encourage and promote public housing residents to explore homeownership opportunities and programs through HACSB's Homeownership Assistance Program targeted at current residents. HACSB also encourages and supports residents in participating in homebuyer counseling programs and recommends residents use the family self-sufficiency escrow account to save money towards homeownership. As of December 2017, HACSB's Homeownership program is the second largest in the state by the families participating in the program and is 31st nationwide among nearly 700 agencies with homeownership programs. Since 2002, 248 families have become homeowners through the Housing Authority's Homeownership Assistance Program, which provides mortgage assistance to working families for up to 15 years and families with disabilities for up to 30 years. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 124 Page 256 If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Not applicable. HACSB is considered a High Performing PHA. Discussion HACSB is well-positioned to maintain and expand the supply of affordable housing units in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and throughout San Bernardino County through its partnerships with the State of California, San Bernardino County Department of Community Development and Housing, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, other cities throughout the county and Housing Partners I, a nonprofit affiliate of the Housing Authority. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 125 Page 257 AP -65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.420,91.220(i) Introduction The City will invest CDBG funds during the 2020-2021 program year to address high priority needs identified in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan including providing public services to homeless populations and those at risk of becoming homeless. According to the most recent Point -In -Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) data available from the PIT Count held in January 2019, on any given night in San Bernardino County, approximately 2,607 people are homeless. More specifically, the PIT Count reported that 58 individuals are homeless on any given night in Rancho Cucamonga. This represents a 9.4 percent decrease over the prior year of 64 homeless persons. To address incidences of homelessness that may occur in Rancho Cucamonga and to prevent extremely low-income families from becoming homeless, the City places a high priority on programs that work to prevent homelessness or rapidly assist homeless individuals living in the community. To address this need, the City will support CDBG public service activities that help prevent homelessness and that provide a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become homeless. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs To reach out to unsheltered homeless persons and assess their individual needs for the purpose of connecting them with available emergency shelter and transitional housing resources, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, through its Planning Department will provide information and referrals. Additionally, to reduce and end homelessness, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will provide CDBG public service funds to the following activities: • Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Program (5 people) • Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk (75 people) • House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services (100 people) • Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization Program (275 people) Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons To address the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons, the City supports the Foothill Family Shelter Program that provides transitional housing, counseling and case management to families at risk of homelessness. Each year, Foothill Family Shelter serves approximately 5 families with an array of services beyond housing, including career services, childcare and a food pantry. Additionally, Inland Valley Hope Partners provides emergency supportive services to families at risk of becoming homeless. Each year, Inland Valley Hope Partners assist 275 people. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 126 Page 258 Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again To address the needs of homeless families, families with children, veterans and their families, the City supports the Foothill Family Shelter Program that provides transitional housing, counseling and case management to families at risk of homelessness. Each year, Foothill Family Shelter serves approximately 5 families with an array of services beyond housing, including career services, childcare and a food pantry. Additionally, Inland Valley Hope Partners provides emergency supportive services to families at risk of becoming homeless. Each year, Inland Valley Hope Partners assist 275 people. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low- income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. The CoC is developing resources of information (such as 2-1-1) to better serve individuals who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. In addition, the CoC is working to implement a database using real time information from intake and assessment that is housed in the Homeless Management Information System (HIMS). Collectively these strategies will help minimize duplication of effort and better connect the most vulnerable individuals and families, chronically homeless, and people at risk of becoming homeless to appropriate resources. Discussion The City of Rancho Cucamonga considers addressing homelessness a high priority need for the CDBG program and will support public service activities that help prevent homelessness and that provide a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become homeless. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 127 Page 259 AP -75 Barriers to affordable housing - 91.420, 91.2200) Introduction A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful. Based on information gathered during community meetings, the Consolidated Plan Survey, the 2013- 2021 Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Rancho Cucamonga are housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing. The two barriers are related in the sense that demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply and insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing to meet demand. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment In the development of the 2013-2021 Housing Element, the City evaluated significant public policies affecting affordable housing development such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges and growth limitations. Based on this evaluation, the City determined that it has taken all necessary steps to ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that may have been a barrier to affordable housing. Moreover, the City is actively engaged with affordable housing developers concerning the siting of affordable housing and ensuring that the entitlement process runs smoothly from inception to completion. Discussion To address housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources for affordable housing, the City will continue to leverage its CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources to incentivize the development of new affordable housing units and the preservation of existing affordable housing. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 128 Page 260 AP -85 Other Actions - 91.420,91.220(k) Introduction In the implementation of the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private social service agencies. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, and the high cost of housing that is not affordable to low-income people. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2020-2021 Action Plan in projects that provide assistance to low- and moderate -income residents. To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG investments for program year 2020-2021 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people or people presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate - income. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing In the implementation of the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG funds to preserve and maintain affordable housing through the City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program that will provide grants and deferred loans to low- and moderate -income owners of single-family housing. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. To reduce lead-based paint hazards, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Home Improvement Program will conduct lead-based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978 and will incorporate safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead-based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 129 Page 261 Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan -Strategic Plan and this Annual Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by: • Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income households • Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness • Supporting public services for low- and moderate -income residents In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally, in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi -Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The institutional delivery system in Rancho Cucamonga is high -functioning and collaborative particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City support and enhance this existing institutional structure. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will collaborate with affordable housing developers and nonprofit agencies receiving CDBG funds through the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan to ensure that the needs of low- and moderate -income residents are met as envisioned within the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies To enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will continue consulting with and inviting the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations involved in the delivery of housing and supportive services to low- and moderate -income residents in Rancho Cucamonga. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 130 Page 262 Discussion In the implementation of the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private social service agencies. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan U3 Page 263 AP -90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 0 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 100.00% 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Action Plan 132 Page 264 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 APPENDIX A Alternate / Local Data Sources 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 133 Page 265 Appendix A - Alternate/Local Data Sources 1 Data Source Name San Bernardino County 2019 Homeless Count List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership Provide a brief summary of the data set. This report provides the results of a comprehensive count of the San Bernardino County homeless population. What was the purpose for developing this data set? To meet HUD requirements. Provide the year (and optionally month, or month and day) for when the data was collected. The most recent Point -in -Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) was held on January 24, 2019. Briefly describe the methodology for the data collection. The 2019 PIT Count collected data on people who were literally homeless (i.e. living in unsheltered situations or on the street, in a vehicle or other place not meant for human habitation, or in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program). Describe the total population from which the sample was taken. According to the 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5 -Year Estimates, the population of San Bernardino County was approximately 2,121,220. Describe the demographics of the respondents or characteristics of the unit of measure, and the number of respondents or units surveyed. Please refer to NA -40. 2 Data Source Name 2019 CoC Homeless Inventory Count Report List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. San Bernardino County Homeless Partnership Provide a brief summary of the data set. Provides the inventory of facilities and housing targeted to homeless households. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 134 Page 266 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 135 Page 267 What was the purpose for developing this data set? To meet HUD requirements. How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? The data covers the San Bernardino City and County CoC. What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? Report date October 28, 2014. What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 135 Page 267 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 APPENDIX B Citizen Participation Process 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices U6 Page 268 Appendix B - Citizen Participation Process Inland Vallell Balli Bulleldn (formerly The Daily Report) 9616 Archibald Avenue Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-987-6397 legala@in landnewspapers.com 5031285 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY OF -LEGAL ATTN: FINANCE DEPT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DR RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of San Bernardino I am a citizen of the United States, I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer Of INLAND VALLEY DAILY BULLETIN, a newspaper of general circulation printed and published daily for the City of Ontario, County of San Bernardino, and which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, on the date ofAugust 24, 1951, Case Number 70663. The notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 08/16/2019 I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed at Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino Co., California, on this 21th day of August, 2019. Signature r.�ram,m,n masu:�r 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices (Space below for use of County Clerk Only) Legal No. 0011303699 CITY OF RAN CH{OCUCAMQNGA N071C.E OF PUBLIC HEAR ING AND REVIEW DRAFT CITIZEN PARTICI PATION FLAN The U.S. Department of Housingg and 1i Development (HUD7 requirrs tha City to sperrfy Its poElCles end gracedures for carrun iiy pprticipation in Oho- doVelapment of StrGte5iaB, planning, and implementation of federal grafts including the Community Vevelopment Black Grort (CE)NO) programs- The City's current Citizen Participcii Alan was 1451 Updated in 2015. The CArren PCrliCip4tlon Plpr ig UW fpr deveIrroant and uM a of the 2015-2D19 Cwsolidated Plan. In comlrliance with the Clrv's current thea dtlzen ParticiparEon Plan and tiye Consolidated Pian implementing regulation at 24 CFR 41.105, this natice, is given to invite public review and comment of the City's Draft Citizen Participation Man: This aacurnent may he revlewed August 19, 2014 through September 19, 7014at the t0llawing locahnns during bu5lness lin rs • RanchP Cm unnisyu City Hull, 10.500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho CucamongqdF, CA 91730 Rancho CQr�aniQngn Public Library, 17565 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucomanna 91739 lndtviduols wishing to exprg6s their vf@vfg Cgnrerning the a44v2- referenced documents and proposed activities may provide written comments to the City an or beta a d:06 p. M. on SeRtember 1B, 2019 to the City of Rancho Cutaroi EC6raarniC Develoornenl Department, MOO Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga 91730. The City Council will hold * public bearing on September 59, 2019, at 7:01 p.m„ at the C,1V Council i hon l}CYS. 105QQ CiViC C2nter pi RanCn4 'CUC4rYlan94. CA 917x0 to receive public ccri on the Draft Citizen Participation Plan. For more information, eentaet Hannah Maeftenxle, Management Alde of (n?) 77,11 ACCESSIBILII`Y TO mill AND DQCUmCWr5, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY It i9 the imemion of the CiTy to comply with Section w4 of the Rehabilitation Act 6f 1473. os arnerded, the Americana with Di3ahilitle3 ACI (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the Fair Housing Acer tho ArthitKfi i Aarri-�r; ACt, and the City's adoptod Lin'liti<ti Enulish ProUciency Plan l9 {LEP) in ell m5re�. It you require Puil documents to an accessible format, the City will make reasonable efforts o 'eoei)mrinn a yawr rmisest_ If, as an attendee or a porticipaint at this meetinQrtau will need special assistance beyond what is normally Provided, Ineludingauxlllary olds ar services, ME City will attempt to ate0h5nhgddte You it ev9rV redSariat5le nianrler. PIe03E OW10 t HonnCh MacKenzie at (409) 774,4343 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to inform usaf your needs and iodetarmine� If acccmimadation is feasible. The City does rot acid sit l not discriminate an the basis of race, color, religion (rmod), gencirr, gender expression, age, notionnl origln (ahCESt ry), diso Qilit]r, maritai ytgtui. 5e3(uu1 4Fiehtuti"n. MiUwry S%Ifft ar other protected class status in o ny of its activities or operations. Publishi Au9Ust Ifs, 2019 CIU DAD DE RANC HO CUCAMONGA AV 150 DE AVDIENC IA Y REV[SION PUBLICA DORRADOR DEL PLAIN DE PARTICIPACION CIUDADANA EI Departementa de V ivienda yo-esarrolio Urbano de las Estucim Unides Nun) rpciuiere cine el Ryunfamiento rte In Ciudad espCCHirue sus p6liilro y procedirnienta5 para la PartiClpull Com Unitaria en el desurrullo de estraleoias, AuTrEficacion a implementacion de subsidius f+eder4les Ineluyenda las Rrogramus de Subsidlus Glahcles para el Desarrollo Carnunitaria (CPUG), EI Flan de Partitipaai#n Cfudadara actual del Avuntarniento de 14 ciuded se actuallzo am liltima vex en 2015 El Plan ae Parlicipaeidn Ciudadana se utiRiza Para el clesorrollo y actualizactun der Ii Caneolidado 7015-2614, En cumplifin id can el Plan d.e Portio€pocldn Ciudadarm aprobodr octwilmente par el AyQntamiento y el regldm¢vtta do implorrentation del Plan Consolidaa Begun en 24 CFR 91.145, sada este uiviso para irrvitnr a la revision publico ycomenturlas sobreel Burrudurdel Plan. de Purticil lon Cludodano del Ayontamienta de Id Ciuda(l- Este dQCi)ntentp pi ser revi3ado el 14 de opo5ta hasty el 1� de septiembre del 2019 en los 5iguientes 109are5 durante el 4torario comerclal indieado enseguFde : Rancho- Cucaman City Hall, 10.500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • ROAC110 CLCornan9a PvbllC 11-1brCrV, 12505 Cultural Center DrivB, Rancho Cucamonga 91734 L3 , PerSPngS vue de522n exvre5nr 5uS puft%S de V151u Can reSpei a 105 dacumentes 'meacicnado5 anterlarmente las activiiii propucsia5 pupdpn Lnvlar com�eaterios par mcrito ely hyuntamlento de In C'oudad 137 Page 269 Advertising Order Confirmation 01l07rz0 4:OBPg.2 Ad Was Color Produeb'nn Color AdAfbfbares Production Method Froduellon Miss 0011552067-01 4 X 60 Li Ad Booker External Ad Number Pick Up Ad T— Released for Publication Legal Liner Cityof Rancho Cucamonga Notice of Funding Avoilabil fly (NOFA) Iing Applications for the Community Development nvit Block Grant (CDBG) Program for Fiscal Year 2020.2021 APPLICAT IONS DUE FEB RUARY 13, 2020 The Federal Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, provides Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds io the Cv of Rancho Cucamonga for Proiecis that Promote the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities, Particularly for low- and moderate -income Persons. The City anticipates receiving an allocation of approximately $993,159 and may use up to 15% of the allocation to provide Public services. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Rancho Cucamonga is carrenfly accepting applications from on -profit organizations redusslin9 funds to Provide Public services to low- and moderale-Iacome residents. ELIGIBLE APPLICATIONS: Applications must demonstrate that the service to be provided will principally benefit persons of low- and moderate -income (households earning less than 80% of San Bernardino's median income). Ezumples of eligible services inclad2 housing and/or Support programs for victims of domestic violence, abused chiltlren/vouth, the disabled, seniors, or the homeless. Additionally, services addressing unemployment, inadequate h¢Plthaar¢, Crim¢ prevention, o substance abuse rehabilitation a eligible. Again, all p Yag YtlmS must benefit persons of low -and moderate -incomes. Applications will also be accepted from organizations seeking to Provide fair housing and landlord tenant services in accordance with HUD re-iremc.11, DEADLINE: All terested pppliconts must cam Plate nd Submit an 5pPliCatiqq available t hitps://www.cityofrc.bs/community- arvice5/housing-resources. Applications will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, February 13, 2020 of the City of Rancho C—mono, Economic Development Department located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA91730. Questions regarding this NOFA should be directed to Hannah Mac Kenzie, Economic DBvclopmcnt Management Aid. at (909) 477-2700 ext. 4303. Pub: January l0, 2020 Inland V0112Y Daily Sul letin-gB N11352047 Product Reaaea[erl Placement ReauaetadPoailion Run Data. 9Inaeda Deily Bulletin Legels CLS IVDB SB General SB -1078- WHIM 1 Order Charges: NetA—, r Announr TgtdAmoad Adoo Amount Dar g 418.40 0.00 416.40 0.00 $416.40 If this conRrmation includes an advertising proof, please check your proof wrefuly for errors, spelling, and/or typos. Errors not marked on the returned proof are nal subject to credit or refunds. Please note: To meet our printer's deadline, vie must have your proof returned by the published deadline, and as indicated by your sales rep. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 138 Page 270 Advertising Order Confirmation CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOTICE OF PUBLFC HEARING AND REVIEW DRAFT CONSOLIDATED PLAN DRAFT ACTION PLAN DRAFT ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTSTO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE Notice is hereby given that the CItY of Rancho Cucommga has prepored the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and Droft 21124.2024 Analysis of Impediments to Falr Housing Choice In acCOrdOnce with U.$. Deparlmgnl of H"Sing ono Uriyon Developmeni (HUD) reauirements to prepare and submit a Consolidated Plan every five years, an Action Plan every year, and an Analysis of imWellments to Fair Housing Choice every five years as a condition o, receiving annual allocations of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The COnSoiidote¢ P10n tobli$heS the high priority houSing, e0mmUnity and ee4nor'rniC development needs of the City and provides a strategy for the types of projects that will receive CDBG funds during the five year period to address specific goals related to the DrDvishan of decent housing, a suitable living environment and expanded economic opportunity for low- and moderate -income residents. The Proposed goals included in the Draft 2026.2024 Consolidated Plan Include: 1) Fair Mousing Ssrvlces; 2) Public Services; 3) AffOedoble HOuSin9 Preservation; and 4) Public F"ilitie5 and Infrastructure Improvements. The Action Plan establishes the programs and activilles to be undertaken using CCiBG funds during the 2020.2021 program year beginning July I, 2020 and ending June 30, 2021. The City anticipates receiving s1,42er131 of CDBG funds for the 2020-2021 program year and onticiooteS receiving similar allocations for the subs94uent four program rears Covered by the Draft 2020.2024 Consolidated Plan. Annual allocations of CDBG funds are subject to change torsed on federal appropriations. and any changes to the HUD grant alloeatian formulas or data used in the formulas, The proposed proiects included in the Draft 2NO-2021 Action Plan include, 1) CDBG Administration ($1185,326) 2) Fair Housing Services (8200001; 3) Public Services (si i%o00); 4) Affordable HOUSing Preservalhon (tdf10,004}; and 5) �ubhc Focilities and Infrastructure Improvements (5704,910), The Draft Consolidoted Plan, Draft 1Lotiprl Planr and Droft Anplygi9 of Impediments to Foir Housing Choice may be reviewed from Morc.h 131 2020 to April 15, 2020 at the foitowfng lucatlans during normal business hours: • City Holl, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamont1a, CA 91730 • Public Library, 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 • anlinect: ht to g2ruiC@I/hDu6irl9 TeSaurCCS Individuals wishing to express their views concerning the above -referenced documents and proposed Cchvilies may Provide written comments to the city an or before April 15, 2#40 to the City of Rancho Cucumwkgo Planning Department, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamangq, CA 41736. The Clty Council will hold a public hearing Do April 15, 2!120, at 7:00 PM, at City Holl - Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Cent9r Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 to receive public comment on the Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020.2021 Action Plan, and 2020-242.4 Analysts of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice. For more inf4rmativn, COntOct Flpvio Nwnei, AM1anOsemenl gnplpSt Qt (909)A77-2750, Ext, 4313, ACCESSIBILITY TO MEETINGS AND DOCUMENTS, EQUAL OPPORTUNITY It is the intention M the City to oamply with Section 504 of the Rehat)ilitotion Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans with Cisabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and the ADA Amendment Act of 2008, the FQir Housing Act, the Architectural Borriers AGI, and the City's adopted Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP) in all respects. If you require public documents in on acces$ibte format, the City whll make reasonable effort$ to oCcommodote your reri4e$t. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, You will need spetial assistance beyond what is normally provided, including auxiliary aids or services, the City will attempt to accommodate vau in every reasonable manner. Please Contact Flavin Nunez at (949) 477- 2754, Ext, 4313 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your needs and to determine If accommodation is feasible. The City does not and shall nat discriminate on the basis of race, calor, religion (creed), gender, gender expression, age, national origin (ancestry), disahpity, marltai status, sexual orionlol`lonr military status, Or other protected class status in any of its activities Or operations. 4f1 J— =1lt A9Ji 'r f }EP-Zr 417�MnGe - igla*� Flavio Nunez 09 (908)477-2750, EA. 4313. Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk AYUNTAMIENTO DE LACIUDAD DE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 139 Page 271 Advertising Order Confirmation AVISV UL AUIJI NLIA VUULIi,A T Kt:VISIVN BORRADI]R DEL PLAN CONSOLIDAD � B04i 2A1]D DEL PLAN DE DESEMPE O BORRADOR DEL AMALLSIS AE IMPEDINlENTOS PARA LA IELECC16N OE V1VI ENDAJIJSTA For medio de Ea Presente se notifico aue el Avvntamiento de Ia Ciudad de Rancho Cucamon a ha preparado el 8ormciclor del Plan Consolidado 2020.2024 y el Barrador del Andllsis de Impedimentos pare la Elecci6n de Vivienda Justa 2020-2024 conf❑rme a Sas reauisitos del pepartamento de Vivfmda Y Desarrollo Urbano de las Estados Unrdos (HUD, par sus siglas on ingll§s) para preparar yy somefer un Pian Consolidado coda cinco ands, un plan de aesempeho Coda arlar y un Andlisis de Impedimentos para Ia Elecaidn de Vivienoolusta coda cmw ana5 cbmo condicivn para recibir asignocivrles anugleS de las fondos de Eos ora rarnas de Subsldios Gkobales para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG, par Sus sig Ids en inglos). Et Plan Consolldado establece las necesldgdes de priorldod mds alta en materia de vivienda, eornunidad Y desarroll4 oconbmicp de lociudad y prQporalona una eslrategia para IRs tiPRs de Prayect95 quo rv041 n fondp$ de CDBG durantc el Periodo de CinCP 0fW5 Pora abordar metas especificas relacionadas al suministro de vlvlenda decente, medlo amblenfa opropiod4 Y ompkir los aper%rkidWES KOndmiCaS pnr0 los residences de Uoios. y moderadvs ingresos. Las metas Prapue5ta5 incluidas en el Borrudor del Plats Consolidado 2020.2Wd Incluyenr 1) Servic)as para Vivienda Justa; 2) Servlelus IRObllcas; 3) C¢nservacidn (fe Vivienda A9equibie; Y 4) Bstab lecimier2tos POUcos a Infr tructurCa- EI Plan de Desempeno estoblece los programas y actividades a realizar utlllzando fondas de CDBe durante el aha del progrpmo iniciando en Julio 1, 2020 Y finolizondo en Junio 30r 2021. EI Ayuntamiento anticipa recibir #1.028.131 de fondas de CDBG para el ono dei programa 2020-2021 y anticlpa reaiblr asiglnaciones similares para los cuotro ants de Pr"romos subsetuentes cubiertos par el Borrador del Plan Consolidado 2070-2424, Las asr naciones de fondas anuales de CDBG estan suietas a combios en funciones federales y cualquler camblo en las f6rmulas de aslgnacl6n tle subskiios de HUO o Ins dartos utilizodos en las f4rmulo5, LUs proyectos propue5tos inCluida5 On ttl Dorrgdor Uel Plon de tJe5empennd 2020.2021 incluyen; 1) CDBG Administration ($185,626) 2) Fair Housing Services (520,000); 3) Public Services ($119,Da0); a) Affordable Housing preservation ($400r040); and 5) Public FacilWes and Infimstructure Improvements (1704,910), EI gerrador del Plan Consollclodo, Sorrader del Plan de Desempeftr y el 13arrador del Analisi5 de Impediment9s Para la ElecciOn de Vivienda Jusla Pueden ser revisadvs a Partir del 13 de margo hasta el 15 de abril en los siguientes lugares durante el bororia comercial indicodo enseguida: • Clty Hail, 10504 Civic Center arlve, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 • Public Library 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cuconwanga, CA 41739 • En lineaen: hihps:,lfwww,cityofrc,usfcamrnunity-5erviceslhousing-resources Las personas elue, deseen exaresdr sus pumps de vista oon resmoo a las documentas mencionados anteriormente y las actividades propuestas Pueden enviar comentarics par escrito al Ayuntamlento de la caudad antes el 15 de abril al Ayuntamiento de la Cludod de Rancho Cuoamongd, 00drtamento tle Plonifi-=idn, 10$00 Civic Center Drive, Roneno Cucamonga, CA 91730. EI Conce.ic Municipal del Ayuntamiento celebrard ung audiencio publEca el 15 de abril, a las } M PAk en City Hall - Council Chambers, 10560 Civic Center Drive, RonCho CuCarnonga, CA 91730 para recibir Comentarlos pUblicos sabre las Borradares del Plan Consolidade 2020.2024, Plan de Deserrtpetio Anual 2020.2021, y Andlisis de Impedimentns para la Elecclon de Vivienda Justa 2020,2024. Para obtener rnoyor rnformocidn, cornuniqu2Se con Flovio Mune2, M4riagernpnt Analyst a1 (909) 477-2750 ext 4313. ACCE511t ILMAD A REUNIONES Y DOCI MEMT05, IGUAI-DA4 DE OPORTUNIDADES E5 la intencibn deJ Ayunfarnienta cumplir tan to S2{ci5n 504 de to Lev de Rehabilitoci6n de 1973, segOn enmendadc, la Ley de Americanus con DiscaPacidades (ADA) de 1990 y la Ley de Entrllenda ADA de 2046, la Lev de Vlvienda Justa, la Ley de Barreras Arquitect6rlicaSr Y el Plan de Dominio Lirrlitodo del Ingles (LEP) adoptadv Por el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad an todm las aspectos. SI necesita documentos pObllcos en un formato accesible, el Ayuntamiento hard lochs los esfuerzos razonables para satisfacer su solicitud. Si, comp osmtente a participant& On Wo reurlibn, nece5ltard osi5tencia e5pecral mQ5 4116 doe Id qUe normalmente se Proporciona, lncluyendo recursos auxiliares a servlcias, el Ayuntorniento intentdrd oComoddrlo tlentro de todg5 la$ nranerpS roxonobles. Cernuniquesp Can Flovip Hum al (909) 477-2750 ext. 4313 par la menas 72 horns clntes de Ig iuntg wrg informarnas de sus necesidades y determiner sl el ocomodo es factlble. EI Ayuntamlenin de la ciudod no discrimino y no deberia discriminar par motivo5 de razo, color, rellgi6n (credo), 96nero, expresi6n de gPnero, ectad, orlgen nacianal (ascendencia), dis4wocidod, BStodo civil, Oriert1pCi6n sexupl, E�Stodo militor a otro estado de cl4Se protesida en cualnuiera de sus actrvidades u operaciones. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 140 Page 272 Page_ of 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 141 Page 273 FEI ❑� FRI http://bit.ly/RanchoResident `i] Attend a Community Meeting The City is preparing the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grants. Residents and stakeholders are invited to attend a Community Meeting and/or complete a brief survey (see QR Code) to provide their opinion about current housing, community, and economic development needs. For More Informaflon, call (909) 7744303 Date: September 19, 2019 Time: 6:00 p.m. until 8:00 p.m. Location: Central Park Etiwanda Room 11200 Base Line Road Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Date: October 19, 2019 Time: 10:00 a.m. until 12:00 p.m. Location: RC Family Resource Center Zinfandel Room 9791 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 Asista a una Reunion Comunitaria EI Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad esta preparando el Plan Consolidado 2020-2024 para los subsidies del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD). Se invita a los residentes y a las partes interesadas a asistir a una reunion comunitaria y/o completar una breve encuesta para proporcionar su opinion sobre las necesidades actuales de vivienda, comunidad y desarrollo economico. Para Obtener Mayor Informacion, Ilame al (909) 774-4303. Fecha: 19 de septiembre del 2019 Fecha: 19 de octubre del 2019 Hora: 6:00 P.M. hasta 8:00 P.M. Hora: 10:00 A.M. hasta 12:00 P.M. Lugar: Central Park Lugar: RC Family Resource Center Etiwanda Room Zinfandel Room 11200 Base Line Road 9791 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 http://b it.ly/RanchoRes identSP 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 142 Page 274 C ityr of Raacha C u-Damonlga Eco nom i -D Devc lopm en t Sepu-mber17, 2619 • $ The Ci}y is cumertty in detirelaPMe-1t of its 202C-2024 Cansalldaled Rap for the %J.5. Cepaeiment of HoasiDg and Urban Gebel ipment (HLfD) grants. Re>>dents and stakeholders are it wited tD amend a commun by meel:irg and. or Dom- le -R -he following brief surrey lo provide their Dpi ion abauk *L- C heC i y's Durrem housing, community, and economic &Velapment needs. Y•OIlr feedback will help th a C:7y four, s its gTa rrt goals. SURVEY: ht.p:-;bi-..-y,R=--v-oR=s =ent end a Co m ur ft Mmft rL% c r * t Frt ox/i+rm4w rain IM 74 V 9 DIpw-rtr+ rdf , q v o Vw Do-ehan n rkM Vv* F"Wu PW W" W 0000 -.0 r+7+ Mn+ WWW ibpl 91+�F'S �h+a1�q c•f+r a-ee w.]�s.typr.tn rtes W- � a Cuk ffiffi lftzIM MW Ir�orD ti Ira tm 1 nwmampn T+e 'PIA LF%"Z%PFI Ids cu*d VEk Lt *xc-,Fti'r�4*WAI)PC+.wr tom,} tr I m Fr %lw Roan RMI �olldlcwFw wAr.dtx D .d. h hp r —d pw p.prar-in— D—d h 7i� p r la mAbodkm drg m ri kxmrdm Y'--&' Li hr a d Chador rim 1 M L rnbi I r..cbri.. b i ,a polmb rtvam :� . rQ ■ 4A rRr.6m qr++ibinp p- -ry— — trFr — R - p— m cp:in m3hr 4 •r• dndm drmYL � m dm -.—Fiidad Ydor]4O.DvvNsm; 1 � .0-W AnWWAV" Op-44efMi39,dM ~' Fd*& 1 &WAMhRM2MM FNk 'iii Abodr 21IF d r rte[ -MMIPX 1w#RI►X Fkn '003 &V Nw129) - M LYjIF CWNrrk LW- xF"yFmP Rct.WW �rrril Raa�r 2nrt1d R� IM kwRu4 _ Mnw�crl,ry�d,9rISF �, G.I�FlS F'ra .•h •3nT.,r :�•_� -',:rte' 4 Cc wir= rta 75 Snares Li6-- COfn Wnt le 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 143 Page 275 hkii C ityr of Ra nch a C u eamon ga EC a nom i G Developm en t Sha red a post .. :•,.• 1. X01 L � :odayr at 1121AMJI at the RC Fare..ify Resource C _ _ - _ - • = v _ _ -;. vin muin ity, and e000-amio deue-.Gprr-Rnt issues fa-- -- _ Amend a GorM1rr4 fft " T',r :.r rt pWM7M M ML Gw*)x Aa4 p#n * 7* 91 174vwinvdlV 4"w"~Dl--�m IMF-IFF+t R50-1M P tip' MR #1 Gm� 11; P.A. wk-E +meq ;r—rrr +w4aarwrY mk &y bmbv l k p W* 7GIm I L. W 9 rom bA p w,id1W pA Tmn 't!m m m ra V6MF m LmEek G'i'i1 I'm later WC I LT* ftZ MCiir R� —4, Ya15 ?+rk PW- 1. Sri IS.1..Sri A F� �h Asha i P&w&kn Oc %'Pjd �iLFWrrtraoe r!%Wtlu pnWarlr 3d411PW UMWkW M2 pa�1 as w *.m w 11pa�Trtrao- � �•NF r Dma-wrt vor�r rt wa IHLn $5 �.;F� �7a IEFGIIA�} } a HF We* w65%!4 X* 1 "W a ,rr WPM Nftedltil 6%) MON&V " U11,4 irt_i4J ydl gwwFxr w W lnakrt as �! �� iN'r �R�QCF /rL.SITY K�� ii��i � •' Y • 5 • I :1 Fmda 13chm CdJ2IF I•�a 'S9 d• mktmcw MIF ' F4a LEhfil arr LMIPA rlarl dd5 iW1t Irs1�124G'r L�r �M P" Lqw.. �C F&*RFIFYCF ce-m tl� rb. 2ktmtI W • I'M 3m W5 Pm ifriI A OR M ;.jk Rwcta paves 0421m ��arp G.F 1170 ❑! ... � r 4 Y`� City of Ranciha cucamonge Eronomic Dowel-opmani September 17. 2 G 1 fr 0 The Gty is ourrermyr In umlelapmem of its M20•2024 GxsaYdatee plan for the U.S. Depar.ment of Iiausirg and Lkban DevelapmenL (HU 01 gran ur RezidmnLsarld sL;3... See Fdoro 05 2 Commems 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 144 Page 276 Ci ter of Rancho C uca m Gnga Eoonom io Development ND-ournber 1 i� 2012 'a The City is currently Irr development o+f its 2G20-2024 Consolidated Plan for the U. S. D2pa rlmrsnt o+f Housing and U rhan G3V31DPM2nt (HUD) grants. Residents and srak2holders are einem raped to fill aur a brief surW2Y 10 provide their Gpinion abOut the Ckjs c -u rr3nt housing, or}rnrnunity, and econornio develcpment needs. Every year the City r2C2ive5 a rang bly one million dollar prank torn the De-Dartrn2ni Df H Dusinp and Urban Development to provide aid tD our Levi and moderato income re... See More FORMS-OFrlmcw MicrosoftFerns C)4 71 Shy Uke Ccwnn-* Yt Share 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 145 Page 277 City of Rancho Cucamonga is on Nextdoor. the neighborhood hub. Cal ifomia Rancho Cucamonga Rancho Cucamonga Public Agencies City of Rancho Cucamonga City of Rancho Cucamonga L d' c"ofrc_us More info... Activity Housing and Economic Development Needs Assessment y Management Ana yst II Flay o Nunez `ro-^ C:x o' :�an�no Ci=cnga 1E 2 -- The City of Rancho Cucamonga is preparing Ihe2020-2024 Consolidaled Plan as required by the U.S. Deparlmenl of Housing and Urban Development. This Needs Assessment Survey is used to obtain input from community residents regarding affordable housing. community development. economic development, and other needs of City residents. The Consolidated Plan allmys Rancho Cucamonga to utilize the Communily Development Block Grant tCDBG}funds to enhance the qualify of life forresidenis. Yourfeedback is important. PJease lake a few minutes to complele this short survey by following this link: h ltp:llb it.l y1R a n c h o R e s i d e nt 1S Sep Subscribers of City of Rancho Cucamonga in General THAM{ 3 REPLY 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 146 Page 278 Resident Survey Results The City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a resident survey to obtain input from community residents regarding affordable housing, community development, economic development, and other needs of City residents. This survey informs the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan that will be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in May 2020. The Consolidated Plan allows Rancho Cucamonga to utilize the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to enhance the quality of life for residents. The resident survey consisted of up to 25 questions that asked residents to rate the level of need in the City of Rancho Cucamonga for additional or improved facilities, housing, infrastructure, or services, and asked residents to answer questions related to fair housing issues. The survey was published in English using Microsoft Forms and was also made available in paper format. Links to the surveys were publicized in the public notices and flyers for community participation, through email distribution, Facebook, Twitter and by local nonprofits and housing partners. The survey was also available in paper format at several public facilities and at community meetings. Paper surveys and flyers were also disseminated to affordable housing complexes and to nonprofit CDBG public service providers. The survey response period was open for 71 days from September 17, 2019 to November 26, 2019. During that time, the City received 470 responses. The survey results for each question are included below. The responses to open-ended questions were lightly edited for readability, formatting, and removal of duplicate answers such as "none" or "N/A". Unintelligible responses, responses containing personally -identifiable information, and responses containing inappropriate language were removed. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 147 Page 279 I�94 City of Rancho Cucamonga ZIP CODE AREAS - • • - CITY UMHDARY fill Of JUI, 19, N191 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 1w; Page 280 1, Please indicate the zip code in which you live More Details 91737 97 4hq 91701 129 hh, W 91730 153 91739 81 11 rip 2, Please indicate the level of need for improved/additional community facilities in the City 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 149 Page 281 Community Facilities 0% 20% 40`G 60% 90% 100°% Senior Centers Childcare Centers fi Youth Centers f: Parks � Community Centers I Health Care Facilities Fire Stations Libraries Accessibility Improvements Homeless Emergency Shelters High Need Moderate Need ■ Love Need ■ No Need 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 149 Page 281 3. Please indicate the need for improved/additional community services in the City Community Services 095 20% 40% 50% 80% Senior Activities I Youth Activities WIN I Childcare Activities - Transportation Services - Anti -Crime Programs Health Care Services Mental Health Services Legal Services High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need 106% 4. If the above questions did not mention a community facility or service that you believe should be discussed, please enter your suggestions below Open -Ended Responses to Question 4: 1. More Police substations 2. The Family Resource Center does an outstanding job. I would say more resources towards food for the low income and folks with that need. 3. Climate Resiliency, bus level of service & Bike trails 4. Affordable housing 5. We have plenty of libraries, policing and fire services. What we really need are homeless shelters. Build at least one homeless shelter in the city. 6. Clean up trash 7. More senior affordable living apartments 8. General crime prevention and gang prevention 9. Veteran resources 10. Compost programs 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 150 Page 282 11. Reduce homeless population 12. Improved landscaping in LMDs that pay for better upkeep. 13. Better internet in rancho 14. Library Services 15. 1 would like to see continued support and improvement for the special needs community. I would like to see earlier age activities and programs as well as after school programs for special needs teens. 16. Not familiar with anti-crime programming. 17. Instead of new parks, the City needs to invest more in the EXISTING parks throughout the city. Many of them are becoming run down and not maintained adequately (e.g., Heritage Park). 18. Another hospital in the city 19. Central park. When are you going to make a central park. Since 1978, the city has been making a central park. Let's get it completed. Parks have been made and completed all over the city, but central still has yet to be completed. Finish it. 20. Some way to control, decrease homeless activity especially around shopping areas 21. Service wise, it would also be nice to see the city put some effort into promoting the acceptance of our diverse and changing world. Our city is made up of a great many different types of people and families. It would be neat to see the city take care to put in some concerted effort to making its residents feel seen. In terms of mental health services, I feel that a great effort needs to be put in place for teens. There is an amazing display of pamphlets for social services directed specifically for teens at the Pasadena Public Library main branch. It has brochures on Abuse, Mental Health, LGBTQ, Homelessness, etc. Having something like this easily accessible to our teens in places like the Library would be a step to showing we support our youth. It seems the library has made an effort to engage our teens, and it is becoming a safe space for them. I love this and hope they can offer these types brochures to our teens. 22. No pottery classes near by, only far in Pomona. No additional art classes for youth and adults. 23. Entertainment - Victoria Gardens Cultural Center needs equipment updates and new carpet inside Lewis Family Playhouse (over 13 years old). Need to budget for upkeep of a theatre more properly. 24. High, high-priority Central Park needs to be finished. 25. We have a problem with over development. If development was curtailed, then our needs would be less. 26. We are need of a dog park as well as water pads for the kids to play. No more apartments or condos. 27. Parking for the new "stack and pack" housing units the City is allowing in our area. 28. Dog parks. I have to drive to a different town to use their facilities. 29. Rent control and affordable housing for the middle class as they can work here but are not able to live here. Gas prices are not helping with the travel expense. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 151 Page 283 30. We do not have enough large parks that can accommodate youth sports leagues. 31. Dog parks 32. Small neighborhood pocket parks. Underground existing utility lines. 33. After school opportunities for middle high school kids. 34. Disability Services- I feel that the Senior Center and Services should be open to adults with disabilities regardless of AGE, as per the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). We have a 37 year old daughter with disabilities whom we feel should be able to use the gym at the time when those under 60 are using it (with supervision). Am willing to go the distance as far as looking into the possibilities. Thanks. 35. Many areas are deprived stable utility services such as Fios. Our area is less than 20 yrs old and a newer track of homes were built about 5 yrs ago which included the installation of Fios. 36. Pool activities for kids that is in door 37. Parks with baseball fields. Stop building Apartments or allowing housing on every empty lot 38. We do not need more housing construction in the city. 39. Parking for all the new apartments. Upland is lacking severely. Don't be like Upland. Parks schools the congestion is getting awful 40. Aquatic Center with fitness classes for seniors, it's a high need. 41. Animal Shelter 42. Road repairs 43. Aquatic Center would be awesome 44. A real hospital. Increased police presence. City league youth sports. Reduction of population density measures. 45. Affordable housing 46. Schools. The schools in this area are overcrowded. 47. We have a toxic bullying problem in our kids schools and nothing is being done. The governor banned suspensions and schools use PBIS which actually makes the bullies worse. What can the city do? 48. Build pickleball courts 49. Fields for American football for youth 50. Get the homeless off the streets and out of the parks. Prosecute the crimes, even lower level theft/robbery, or mail tampering etc. 51. No more housing 52. Extend the Rancho Cucamonga Police Dept hours to full time Monday through Friday. 53. Rancho Cucamonga needs a full time 24/7/365 police department in the city 54. Low income housing. The rents are not comparable to the salaries in this state. Salaries have not increased in the same rate as rents. Stop building McMansions they are horrible for our planet and no one can afford them not anyone that works here at least. 55. Softball fields for the girls. We have 6 little leagues with multiple fields at each. The girls have 2 men's fields for their use. Could generate money for the city at central park with a multi park fields. Much smaller cities have excellent quality fields for softball. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 152 Page 284 56. Horse trails and sports fields with lighting 57. Rancho has become very crowded. I moved her 30 years ago to get away from all the traffic, but it's here now. 58. Housing. Stop allowing so much overbuilding in our community. Schools are overloaded already Unless plan is to build an additional elementary, intermediate and eventually High School our children will suffer. 59. Community swimming pool at Central Park 60. No questions but I wish the city would stop building new houses, condos, apartments, etc. It's becoming overcrowded and a less desirable place for me to raise my family. 61. Community Gymnasium, health club, and community pools. 62. public swimming pool in Rancho Cucamonga 63. The Animal Center needs all the help it can get. A second facility for housing dogs, away from the Stadium and noise of fireworks and all of the activities. On property with room outside for walks, meet and greets, a few large, enclosed areas for play time and room for the pigs and goats. The current facility can house cats, the kitten nursery, and other animals; the veterinary area and staff could be expanded. 64. Eliminate the neighborhood park districts and replace with a City-wide Parks District. 65. We need center for homeless people in the community 66. No need for more housing, it stretches the already limited resources of police and fire. 67. The city needs to encourage local business in buildings that are sitting empty, for years. The building on Haven and Baseline that had Long's Drug store has been empty for far too long. I know that it's private ownership, but how many businesses have closed in our city lately because of rent that is too high? How long did it take to get the restaurants in the Haven City development ready to open. It feels like some businesses (residential development) get lots of help and others don't. There are too many buildings sitting empty around the city. 68. Sports fields for young adults 69. Recorded videos of full city council meetings. 70. Large parks with lighted sports fields to accommodate and support youth sports leagues. 71. Congestion on the streets where the city insists on building more housing so people who want to live in RC but can't afford it can move. Stop building. 72. Enough of the Stack & Pack condos. They are an eye sore, do not provide sufficient parking and are bringing more crime into our area. 73. So much more housing being built (that many residents voted against) yet no discussions of new schools to accommodate the large amounts of residents you have decided to welcome. 74. No more stack n pack homes, no more HUD housing. Reduce crime. 75. We need soccer fields. 76. Senior affordable housing & assisted living. Must be affordable & fair, far too many families spend their lives in Rancho Cucamonga paying taxes to the community & now when they need help through their community they can not afford it. " 77. More bicycle lanes and education on bike rights 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 153 Page 285 78. Many lifted sidewalks that are dangerous. Neighbors have asked months ago for this repair. I walk everyday and there are many bad sidewalks. Also, there are many sidewalks that are not cleaned and are not in front of residents homes, like Archibald and areas of Hellman, glass is often all over them and will sit there for weeks. 79. No more dense housing that brings more people, congestion and crime, as well as, an overstretching of resources. 80. Horse facilities protected 81. Dog parks 82. We need a soccer sports complex on the west end of Rancho 83. More police, less people. 84. City needs to install speed bump/speed humps, or stop signs, on the 9500 block of Palo Alto and other streets that have none of the above. The residential speed limits are not followed and police do not have resources to park a cruiser on my street everyday. I am sick of being tailgated on my own street because some people have no self control. This is a problem on most residential streets in this city. I have plenty of video footage to prove this happens every day. Driving 35, 40,50, and on Friday and Saturday nights higher than 50, is dangerous in a residential neighborhood. Fix it. 85. Sports center, quality soccer fields. 86. We need more open space and more opportunities for equestrian activities 87. Stop building, too much traffic and reduce crime. 88. Help from the city for nonprofit youth organizations 89. Street maintenance and running and equestrian trails. 90. Dog parks in close proximity to neighborhoods for pet owners. Natural preserves for hiking and nature habitats. 91. 1 want Central Park be finished. 92. A grant is needed to improve the Heritage park. A grant is needed to improve the aesthetics of the entrance to the city at 19th and Sapphire. However it is probably unrelated to the survey. 93. Low cost after school care. 94. We need a Community pool 95. We need parks for the kids. We need baseball and softball parks. We need less housing. 96. We need more large parks that can accommodate youth sports leagues. Fontana has a much better parks system. We need to catch them. 97. Voter registration station. Roads conditions have too many potholes. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 154 Page 286 5. Please indicate the need for improved/additional infrastructure improvements in the City Infrastructure Improvements 0% 2095 40% 60% 90% 100% drainage Improvement Water/Sewer Improvement — Street/Alley Improvement Street Lighting , Sidewalk Improvements Accessibility Improvements2 1.1 a High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need 6. Please indicate the need for improved/additional special needs services in the City Special Needs Services 0`ifi 20% 40% 60% $0% M)% Centers/Services for the disabled Domestic Violence Services Substance Abuse Services — Homeless Services HIV/AIDS Centers and Services _ Neglected/Abused Children Centers and - Services ■ High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 155 Page 287 7. Please indicate the need for improved/additional neighborhood services in the City Neighborhood Services 0% 20% 40% 609 BO% 10096 I Tree Planting Code Enforcement Graffiti Removal Parking Facilities Cleanup of Abandoned Lots and Buildings High Need Moderate Need ■ Law Need ■ No Need g. Please indicate the need for improved/additional business and jobs services in the City Business Services 0% 2696 40% WA 80% 100% Start Up Business Assistance Small Business Loa ns/Grants Job Creation/Retention Employment Training Commercial Facade Improvements High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 156 Page 288 g. Please indicate the need for Improved/additional housing services in the City Housing Services 0% 20% 40% 6496 80% 100% Housing Rehabilitation Assistance to Purchase a Home Fair Housing Discrimination - Lead-based Paint Removal Energy Efficient Improvements High Need Moderate Need ■ Low Need ■ No Need 10. Please indicate the need for improved additional housing facilities in the City Housing Facilities c`k 2GIA 40% 60% 80% 100% Housing for the disabled Senior Housing Single Family Housing Affordable Rental Housing I i Transitional and Supportive Housing High Need Moderate Need ■ Law Need ■ No Need 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 157 Page 289 �. Do you have broadband internet access at home? More Details Yes 429 No 3E 12. If you do have broadband internet access at homer haw much do you pay for this service per month? More Details 0 SO -25 4 526-50 63 551-73 192 576-100 110 PMN • 5100+ 50 Wr 13. Do you feel adequately prepared for a natural disaster (e.g. earthquake, wildfire, tsunami)? More Details Yes 220 No 241 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 158 Page 290 14. Please provide any comments associated with the needs listed above, or other needs Open -Ended Responses to Question 14: I am definitely not prepared for a tsunami. 2. 1 wish I knew more about what we currently have to balance it against what we need. 3. Provide services for the poor in the city. Less emphasis on the needs of single-family neighborhoods. They are already well-off enough already. Services should be aimed towards those who need affordable housing and support services. 4. What to prepare in case of earthquake. 5. Parking of abandoned vehicles and city park cleanliness 6. The cities choice to limit cable companies has caused the cost plus the city fee that has doubled make a resident see red. 7. Streets need to be attended too, especially extending Wilson through in the east part of the city. Also, it would be nice to have a park above the corners of Wilson and Wardman Bullock. 8. need more internet choices, less high-density housing 9. Street name signs on traffic signals need to be kept up - you can hardly read some of them at night they are so faded. 10. Better internet please. 11. No idea where we'd go during an emergency, safe structures/shelters? 12. Crime rate has gone up, too many apartments, condo etc. are being built. We need more police patrol 13. City wide Wifi. 14. Completion of Central park. Get it done. Remove the existing fire hazard at central park. It's a city liability. Don't play favorites. A private citizen would have been cited numerous times for what has been allowed to exist at central park. 15. Lower internet rates or more providers 16. We need a grocery store in the south part of town, those of us who in below foothill and Hermosa need to drive to Ontario or up to baseline and haven or foothill and vineyard for the closest grocery stores 17. 1 will soon be cancelling my home internet due to the cost. I am home for a small percentage of the day and when I am home, I often use my cell phone hotspot because it is better than the home service. The only reason I have kept it until now, is I need to change my email address on many accounts and I haven't done that. Transitioning by the end of the year is my target. A big concern I would love the city to address is school pick-up and drop- off zones. There are many places where a thin lane could be painted to keep those vehicles 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 159 Page 291 out of the main lane where they block up an entire road, often times before school has even let out, thereby creating a full road block with no movement beyond travelling in the lane of oncoming traffic to get around those parents waiting. This seems to have successfully been done on Archibald for the elementary school just above Foothill. An example of a school that needs attention would be Cucamonga Middle School (Westbound Church St at Hellman). The entrance to the parking lot at the corner of Church and Hellman is off of Church. Once enough cars have entered the parking lot for pick-up, the remaining (many) vehicles stick out onto Church St. There is plenty of space for those cars to idle along the curb of Church St. while they wait for school to let out. If this area was restricted from parking, there would be plenty of room for a lane dedicated to those vehicles turning onto campus. I have been jammed up in a few places around the city where cars block roads just waiting for school to let out. It seems that schools should dedicate sometime to looking at this issue and making sound recommendations to the city for road improvements to address the issue. 18. 1 wish to have more job fairs, or just jobs in the area. All normal pay jobs are either near downtown LA or in Orange country which is ridiculous to drive for 2 hours one way every day. May you guys build more office buildings to attract more businesses to our area? There are plenty fields near Ontario airport. Can you create more jobs for near by residents in order to clear 210 and 10 freeways towards LA. In a morning and afternoon these freeways are packed. 19. Though I am prepared for a disaster, there are NOT a lot of stores in this area where one can purchase supplies before a disaster. The one in Upland closed. It's recommended that each person in the home have a backpack with much needed supplies in case of a disaster. I learned what I needed from my mother who worked for a Central Valley county that provided classes to the staff & community. 20. Energy efficiency efforts are great; love seeing solar panels at the high schools, keep going in that direction. Let's be a leader in this. 21. Crime is climbing, need more night shift patrol. 22. Crime is a problem 23. With more affordable housing comes increased need for amenities to support increase in population and traffic which seems to be on the rise in our communities. 24. Reduce homelessness. It's a horrible sight every time the Sheriff's Department drive their buses whether loaded or not of inmates down Etiwanda instead of using the 4th street exit. 25. It effects the quality of life and discourages new home owners from purchasing while I looking to move into this part of town. 26. No new housing. 27. More internet services offered would be nice 28. Archibald improvements around Banyan have been completed, is the road going to be widened further up (around Hillside) where the residential lot goes out into the road like it did at Banyan? 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 160 Page 292 29. Consider de-lamping some areas. Ten lights for an intersection with a signal in a neighborhood far from industry is extreme. For example Banyan/Carnelian and Banyan/Archibald 30. I'm poor because rent is so high and I'll never afford a house at this rate. 31. Recommend the City provide emergency awareness workshops informing residents of City protocols, demonstration of how to turn off gas and water valves, sell/ provide emergency kits, etc. Have these workshops annually. Let residents what areas will be designated as emergency shelters. This will help prepare family emergency plans. 32. There is monopoly on internet service and not enough choices in my area, tv service prices too high, and need to reduce homelessness. 33. Affordable senior housing is a prime need in Rancho Cucamonga. 34. Open up competition for broadband service (eliminate franchise fee on my bill). Enforce codes on parking trailers/RV's in front yards. Underground existing utility lines. 35. Need to get the Chaffey area off of septic tanks - city should improve/build sewer system so houses can connect. 36. The zip code in which I live in there are many horse trails between homes. These horse trails are poorly maintained and very difficult to walk through. I have children that go to the local schools and we are constantly dodging weeds or shrubbery due to poor maintenance in these trails. 37. The community has grown astronomically over the last 10 years. Due to this growth traffic has increased throughout the day, not just during the busy times of the morning and evening. There is a constant flow of cars in the city and many new developments are going to add to the overpopulation. There are already a lot of housing type options throughout the city. The local schools are already impacted, each high school already serving about 3500 students. Think about that 3500 students at each local high school. I believe the high schools are doing a great job with the current numbers they are serving although I know many students do fall through the cracks. 38. 1 would like more information distributed to residents on where my closest Red Cross shelter will be i.e., is a school in area a hub? 39. Need housing for the disabled. Otherwise, too much multi -family housing going on. Too much traffic and drain on resources. 40. There should be adequate affordable parking within apartment complexes for residents and guests to reduce overflow parking and unwanted traffic in adjacent single-family resident neighborhoods. 41. The city needs to open the providers for internet so that we are not stuck with a monopoly of one or two that does not offer any competitiveness. 42. We don't need any more fire stations 43. We do not need additional housing construction in the city. No more building of homes, whether it be SFR, multi use or any other type. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 161 Page 293 44. Need more competitive choices in cable tv providers monopoly of charter/spectrum is bad black eye for city government in my opinion or at least make them upgrade equipment and be competitive in pricing for established customers 45. 1 have lived in Rancho Cucamonga for 24 years and the services for the mentally ill, the homeless, and services pertaining to preventing and stopping crimes is highly needed. 46. We have 2 mbs DSL but agree landlocked from higher speed service. Waiting for fiber or 5g. 47. Enough growth/ Keep city safe, clean. The parks are great. Keep parks clean. 48. Multiple options for broadband would be good 49. Citywide preparedness kits needed. 50. All available internet and media providers are subpar. 51. There is a huge shortage of senior and affordable housing in Rancho. Build more of these homes instead of the overpopulated mansions 52. Reduce homelessness. Plus the city needs to address the shortage of entry level home units available to meet demand. New housing starts should abandon the pack and stack condos and focus on smaller single story homes on a modest sized lot. I think that style is more compliant with the city's master plan vision and desired by the young small families. 53. 1 walk on Victoria Park Lane near Day Creek and there's bees that are covering a sewer panel and sometimes they attack me. There's also huge spiders suspended in the air by their webs and their population is increasing. 54. Lower rent in our area without sacrificing safety and or location, especially for families 55. Need a light at the crosswalk. At Victoria Park lane and Mosaic drive. 56. Stop building here. You have overbuilt our town. It's terrible now and over crowded 57. Must find a way to lower the price of housing especially for seniors and first time buyers. Instead of building large $800,000 homes, build 1800 sq ft homes for $300,000 and continue building so the price will not go up. In many locations you can buy such housing. Why not in California 58. Housing needs to be affordable. 59. Senior housing yearly rent increase should have a strict cap per year for approximately 10 yr period. As I understand the current restrictions 3%/4%. For years our Sr mobile community paid 3% this year new owners increased to 3.8%. Wallet shock to many. 60. Need better lighting at RC train station. Lighting is insufficient. Need more coverage during high winds, while waiting for train. 61. 1 would like to see more single story homes built for when we baby boomers retire, currently we live in two story home and not many 1 story homes out there. 62. Also I would like to see complete earthquake kits for sale at community center perhaps, or local grocery stores. 63. We need better lighting at train station and residential areas, too dark. 64. Affordable single family housing in Rancho Cucamonga 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 162 Page 294 65. Become a leader in public transportation by creating more metro lines. These millennials that are going to eventually take over this city would move and live here if there was cool public transport such more metro lines. Add a line from metro station to Chaffey College. 66. No matter how prepared you are for a disaster, mother nature is not going to notify you ahead of time when it will happen. 67. West side of town needs cleaning up. Require yards to be maintained as per Rancho Cucamonga ordinance. 68. There is a need for nice, quality, AFFORDABLE nursing homes for disabled seniors. 69. Free wifi for seniors would be a blessing. I can't afford 80.00 or more a month for wifi and don't want cable with free over the air TV. Why are Hispanics not represented in the following question. My family was here in the 1900s picking grapes. 70. Spectrum has a monopoly on broadband. We need competitors to improve services and pricing. 71. Need to address the internet monopoly in the city. Allow more than spectrum to provide service. 72. Am not pleased with recent 3 & 4 story high condos built in in Terra Vista and on Foothill. Too many homes built on small parcels of land, equals lack of adequate parking within the complex, which means parking on existing 2 lane streets, now reduced to 1 lane to accommodate lack of on-site parking. This is not fair to existing homeowners. 73. Lower rental costs for single mothers. Lower rental costs for everyone. 74. Rental housing rates too high My children are having to look elsewhere to rent an apt with their friends and I have gotta say Rancho used to be the place they desired to stay near -not anymore. Claremont and La Verne are better desired 75. Need free broadband WiFi 76. Please, no more housing. I am limited on internet options and am force to go with spectrum if I want high speed. Don't know of the city has any control but would love that to change. Utilities are going up such as water and electricity. Would also love that to stop. 77. While broadband is widely available Fiber Options are not as widely available. 78. Spectrum Charter Internet is our only area providers and not only does it not connect often, it's so expensive for the junky service. 79. Safety, crime prevention and less apartments being built. More senior living and affordable home buying options 80. Yes, I'm very prepared for a tsunami. 81. We could use Earthquake kits for residents. Free would be great. Low cost is ok also. 82. The rent for seniors in the current housing situation goes up at least $1200 a year but our income does not do the same. Their needs to be more apartment/condo housing available for middle or moderate (not low) income seniors. The housing available is too expensive and seniors are caught in between or eliminated from anything that they can afford. Seniors are having to rent rooms with strangers in order to survive. 83. Why doesn't the City allow more competition for internet service? Spectrum has a monopoly and charges very high princes. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 163 Page 295 84. The city should allow another carrier than Charter/Spectrum to offer service. This is too much like a monopoly for my comfort. We should have more choices and the lower prices would reflect the competition. 85. The cost of internet service is absolutely ridiculous. It's not supposed to be a monopoly, yet we only have one service provider for our area. Internet service is a must, especially since we work from home. These houses have been here for nearly 40 years, yet there's no Verizon availability for internet? It's very frustrating. 86. Individuals, not the city, should be responsible for some of the services/facilities mentioned in this survey. There are too many people on the government dole expecting the rest of us to pay for their homes/services. 87. "You've allowed Spectrum, now AT&T to monopolize too many areas. We have no choice for internet and prices are ridiculous. You've overbuilt on every parcel of land, yet no new schools. Traffic is worse, parking is worse, schools are overcrowded, and there's too much crime. 88. Is there a disaster center to house residence if homes are destroyed in a natural disaster? 89. Please stop building housing of any kind in the city. 90. Stop building apartments. Specially low-income housing. 91. Affordable (key word) Senior Housing for disabled, to include assisted living, and memory care facilities to meet financial needs and those not able to meet federally funded programs. The federal government programs have 2 year waiting list. The community is aging and we need to prepare for the people who have had longevity in making this city what it is today. 92. Small businesses are being run out of Rancho Cucamonga due to high rent from large corporations that monopolize our city. They may get startup funding but their longevity is compromised by the high rent and many small businesses cannot meet all the demands (insurances, overhead costs, wage rates, etc.) and pay high rent. 93. Many families are cohabiting in one dwelling due to financial constraints and affordability of the housing market. This has an impact on children and families in our community. The local school districts are showing declining enrollment. I believe that part of this is due to the affordability for new families with young children that cannot maintain residency. Many families have children that have been through the schools and moved on to places that they can afford. Fact is, many new families cannot move into Rancho Cucamonga. School districts are going to lose funding due to smaller enrollment, professionals will have to relocate if jobs are eliminated. Vicious cycle will encompass Rancho Cucamonga if we don't make a change and address these issues. 94. We need less low income housing here in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, completely unfair to those who have sacrificed to be here. 95. It would be nice to have more options for internet and cable tv service. More options may bring the cost down some. 96. No more building. 97. Many folks in my neighborhood are frustrated with the continued development of open land, the high density housing in particular, it is changing our city. we are also getting a lot 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 164 Page 296 more wild animals in our neighborhood because we are taking their land (coyotes, bobcats, etc) 98. 1 think the water company s out of control on charges. The communications companies assigned could use a modernization, the cable service is outdated, and forces consumers to use satellite. Thanks. 99. More brush clearance needed in some areas due to high fire dangers. 100. 1 feel that it is very important to finish the Central Park project to enhance the beauty and functionality of our great city. 101. City needs to install speed bump/speed humps, or stop signs, on streets that have none of the above. The residential speed limits are not followed and police do not have resources to park a cruiser on my street everyday. I am sick of being tailgated on my own street because some people have no self control. This is a problem on most residential streets in this city. I have plenty of video footage to prove this happens every day. Driving 35, 40, 50, and on Friday and Saturday nights higher than 50, is dangerous in a residential neighborhood. Fix it. 102. Peoples pets barking and running loose. Panhandling. Reduce crime. 103. What about earthquakes refines all over the city, big drills specially on m6bile home parks we are at the mercy of the park owners and park managers with no training 104. There needs to be more support for families affected by SCE power outages. Flashlights or even ice, ice chests would be helpful. Extra police patrol in dark neighborhoods. Places to go that have lighting for kids to do homework, people who work from home can continue work. Discounted external chargers and batteries. It was extremely difficult to be without power for 23 hours with small children and no food. It costs a lot to prepare with supplies and to replace food. We need more updates from the City and more help. 105. Stop building, too much traffic, & reduce crime coming into city 106. Do not implement any programs that will increase taxes. Rancho Cucamonga residents are already highly taxed. 107. Less apartments, more single family homes. Keep with the city charter 108. We already pay high taxes and fees and don't need more "services" from government that cost us more money. How about initiatives that reduce the cost of living instead? 109. 1 want Central Park be finished. Homeless are living on undeveloped land. Please protect this land and no high density apartments there. It is a park and keep it as a park. 110. More gas stations above Baseline Road 111. Lower cost internet will be great 112. Our Nextdoor sharing shows we need more security patrolling in our communities. 113. 1 have lived in Rancho all my 68 years. The city is "over -built". The traffic is terrible. Schools are packed. The best thing you could do is stop building. The charm is gone. Rancho is ruined because of the things I mentioned above. The apartment building called "Arte" on foothill is ugly as heck. The buildings on church and haven are terrible. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 165 Page 297 114. City wide wifi? Homeless activity. More patrolling to reduce crime in the area. 115. Rent/ Property and taxes are too high. How are our children going to be able to afford this? Traffic is getting bad in Rancho going down Day Creek and Banyan. 116. The Southwest area of Rancho Cucamonga is in serious need of a grocery store. We have none. I have been here 17 years and have to shop in Ontario at Starter Brothers or Target. More and more homes are being built and yet no where for people to buy groceries. The North part of the city is filled with grocery stores. We shouldn't have to drive miles for a market or go out of the city. I know everyone I talk to in my neighborhood feels the same way. 117. 1 don't think the monopolistic hold of the cable companies, like Spectrum in my area, will ever change, but something needs to be done. They are pretty much the only real game in town when it comes to High -Speed Internet and they are charging like it. Also, this is the big reason we are way behind other countries when it comes to internet speed and we pay a much higher cost, even some of those that are not as rich as USA. I wish cities, or even the federal government, would treat internet access like a utility. Lay fast fiber lines and then lease them to vendors to sell. There is no incentive for cable companies to provide fast reliable service because they control the lines and have no competition. If I want fast service, I am expected to pay around $200 for Spectrum to lay fiber lines, which, means as time goes they will have fiber installed, did not cost them a dime and they can charge more. So not only I have to pay for them to update their system, but also pay more per month, and for what? Once the line is installed, it cost nothing extra for Spectrum to provide me with faster internet, yet they get to charge more. 118. 1 feel you are already over -crowding our city with housing that just makes more congestion on our roads without doing a complete survey of improving our roads and schools first. 119. Rancho Cucamonga and surrounding city's need activities and events for young adults and older individuals who have psychiatric conditions (Le bipolar disorder, anxiety, add/adhd, ptsd) where we can meet and find a support group or friends. 120. Stop high density development. 121. Rancho needs to focus on the southwest corner of the city. It's ridiculous how little care is given to the neighborhood of working people while the commercial and northern part of the city has great sidewalks and landscaping paid by the city yet the poor hardest working people are given scraps, bad roads, no investment. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 166 Page 298 15. Have you ever experienced discrimination in obtaining or maintaining housing? More Details 0 res 24 40 No 441 Ito 16. Who do you believe discriminated against you? More Details Lend lord/Property Marager 18 Real Estate Avert 4 Mortgage Ler der or Senicer E Mortgage Insurer Other 17. On what basis do you believe you were discriminated against? More Details Race 13 Galor 3 �G Na#iorraIOrigin 4 1a Gerder 3 B Age 6 6 Religion 2 4 FamilySWus(eg.single- pare... S DisatHl 3 I Nis • Other 5 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 167 Page 299 If you believe you have experienced housing discrimination, did you report it.? More Details res 2 No 21 19. If you did not report the incident, why did you decide not to report the housing discrimination? More details Do n't know where to report 10 Too much trouble 2 40 Afraid of retaliation 4 40 Don't believe it makes any diff... 11 40 Other 4 20. Please select the race that you identify as More Details White 294 Bla€k/Afri€ar Ameri€an 23 300 Asian 26 2 d American Indian/Alaskan Native d 200 Native HlawaifanA)ther Pacific... 5 150 American Indian/Alaskan Nati... 6 Ameri€an Indian/Alaskan Nati... 100 1 Asian & White 3 s`5 Bla€Wmri€ar Amen€an &White 2 0 Other M.ilti-Racial 77 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices .M -M_- 168 Page 300 21. Please select the ethnicity that you identify as More Details Hispanic 115 Non -Hispanic 327 22. Please select the gender of the individual who is the head of the household More Details Male 266 Female 187 oil 23. Are any household members severely disabled? More Details Yes 30 No 431 4i# 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 169 Page 301 24. If you have any additional comments, please share them below Open -Ended Responses to Question 24: 1. I chose what I pay for cable each month and that includes TV. 2. You should include other identifying factors in this section such as Gender Identity and sexual orientation in this discrimination section. 3. There are a lot of 20 -somethings and 30 somethings in the city, and I feel like our voices aren't heard. Current policies are mostly driven to serve the older generation. 4. I'm a senior citizen and I have been applying for a Senior affordable living for over 5 years in some senior facilities here in Rancho Cucamonga but until now I have not called yet, the list is so long no available space yet. 5. Mostly like the direction of the city, focus on single family homes and less apartments. 6. No tents and reduce homelessness. 7. Hard to find single story homes for disabled people 8. Way too many mass housing projects. 9. Overall, I love my city. I have lived here over 20 years and am happy. 10. We need more office jobs in our Rancho -Ontario -Fontana areas. Freeways are nightmare every morning and afternoon. Can you create more office type jobs here in this area? 11. There is a tremendous need for middle income senior citizens housing and activities. The rents are going up $1200. or more a year and our income is not going up. There is also a need for more activities and another senior center. One with Bocce Ball and affordable bus trips. Other senior centers all over the nation offer so much more variety than the one here in Rancho Cucamonga. 12. This may not apply but I have concerns about mail being taking and homes and cars being broken into in my area. All of the Post Offices in Ranch all have to be locked up when they are not open for business and the drive up mailboxes outside has been removed. 13. Proud of this city, but never rest on your laurels. Always look to the future in the long term. And for the love of Pete, do not put a giant Wal*Mart on Milliken and Foothill. Please encourage and focus on small, local businesses, they put money into our city. 14. Get rid of section 8 housing. Quit building apartments. 15. Please add streetlights on Etiwanda and Candlewood. With all the children crossing this street, Etiwanda has become a hazard. 16. The long stretch from Church to Baseline gives people a false idea that they can drive super fast. And ask Sheriff to exit off 4th street not Etiwanda to get to the West Valley jails. So 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 170 Page 302 unfair to have to see them drive up and down Etiwanda. They are effecting the quality of life for us. 17. Do not close the CW Feed Store. I will miss driving by the store and seeing the pumpkin patch, etc. 18. There should be better policing around the schools and redo crosswalks and school crossing signage (painting). 19. More reliable bus system and more frequent buses 20. Need more crime prevention and to prohibit random people from knocking on doors. 21. As far as unease served in our community, we have an amazing senior center. We have wonderful schools although overcrowded. Public transportation is available throughout the city. There are plenty of shopping areas possibly too many. Lots of industry local enough for jobs. Our public services like fire and police are readily available throughout the city. Our services for the disabled are available for those who need it. We have plenty of parks that are well maintained throughout our city as well. 22. We don't need a 3 million dog park. I know the money is already earmarked. But that is over the top. 23. Do not build anymore housing in the city. Too many people, traffic is awful, and crime continues to rise. 24. I'd love to see more youth athletic facilities similar to the ones built in Fontana and Irvine. Kids are pretty neglected in Rancho Cucamonga and need additional outlets to stay out of trouble. 25. No more apartment or condominium development. The city has become far too congested. 26. The city is getting so overbuilt. Traffic is terrible. I made the mistake of leaving my house at 7:00 am. It took me fifteen minutes to get to Daycreek and Highland; two minutes at my normal departure time. 27. We really need to lower prices in housing, half a million for a cramped condo? Half a mil for one bathroom is expensive. 28. If you plan to build thousands of new housing and apartment developments, then please consider the following. Do not claim we do not have enough water for the city, build all this new construction to use up more water, then charge us more for water. Also, it is not fair for single family renters to get priced -out of the area because of all the multiple families residing together. Of course, those families can pay $3000/month when it's not their money but they have three families living together and a subsidized rate. One family cannot pay that, but what if they don't qualify for help because they actually work for a living. 29. Please quit allowing all this building there is not any open space. It is overcrowded. 30. Stop building new homes/condos. Our city is over built and congested. 31. Please stop building apartment homes. Start building more single story homes. Solar panels save energy but they are an eye sore. We need more bins at grocery stores to donate shoes/clothes. We need free shredding services for junk mail (credit card offers) Office max charges too much. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 171 Page 303 32. Many disabled senior residents in our area. I have asked the city to check city sidewalks for hazardous areas and have been rejected. 33. Stop the development of open lands in our city. 34. Gardening maintenance is a problem. Too far between service. Why is budget a problem? Seems to be a lack of priority or accountability. 35. Need more affordable housing, and assistance programs for first time homebuyers. These programs use to be available when Terra Vista was first built. 36. Stop the multi -story apartment complexes. 37. Reduce homelessness and need more police officers 38. Our schools are being impacted by overcrowding. 39. Seniors, disabled, homeless and the mentally ill we need to assist. 40. Too many people. Traffic is bad. Reduce stealing. 41. Rancho Cucamonga City officials need to be more concerned with residential areas than industry. There are no green belts in apartment complexes and never enough parking for residents. In addition, the parking in lots are not big enough to accommodate the number of car that patronize the businesses in the strip malls. City planning needs to be improved. 42. The above questions are for the government, federal and state? I don't like giving out my private information to answer a survey. 43. 1 understand that the new developments on Day Creek/Baseline, Church/Haven, Foothill/Ramona are supposed to provide a wider variety of housing for new residents. I find them to be unattractive and out of reach price -wise for most people. I have heard that the units on Day Creek are not selling because people don't like them. Three stories in one unit? Who would want to live like that? This is not Chicago or New York City. Please try to plan housing that actually benefits and fits in with our community. 44. CDBG funds to enhance the quality of life for residents' why are residents' concerns regarding the crowding of housing being built not considered. Citizens do not want these decisions. 45. Please stop building housing of any kind in the city. 46. Stop building. Stop providing section 8 in luxury apartments. Not fair for the hard-working people that pay FULL price. 47. Services and amenities help promote safety, quality, healthy living environment. 48. Need to increase safety of the community from criminals and crime. Getting to be a serious issue in this community. 49. As a 30 year member of Rancho Cucamonga, I am proud of the improvements that the city fathers have made. However, I am concerned with overpopulating our city without adequate resources to sustain them, including fire prevention measures, traffic, etc. 50. City needs to install speed bump/speed humps, or stop signs, on streets that have none of the above. The residential speed limits are not followed and police do not have resources to park a cruiser on my street everyday. I am sick of being tailgated on my own street because some people have no self control. This is a problem on most residential streets in this city. I 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 172 Page 304 have plenty of video footage to prove this happens every day. Driving 35, 40,50, and on Friday and Saturday nights higher than 50, is dangerous in a residential neighborhood. Fix it. 51. We need more patrols at night. Our mailboxes and cars are getting broken into repeatedly nightly. 52. Too many new houses being built. Leading to too many traffic lights, co festoon on roads, in schools and putting enormous pressure on essential services 53. Looking for initiatives from government that will reduce the cost of living instead of promoting new plans that will raise the cost of living. 54. More Bus stops above 210 freeway. 55. Why is that another choice for internet service is only Spectrum. This needs to be investigated to have more options. 56. Most of the streetlights are off and need to be looked at. Have to wait too long when no other cars are coming. When is the Melo Ros going away? Saw on Haven low tax and no Melo Ros. 57. There needs to be housing for seniors not apartments. A 55 and older community would be a great asset to Rancho. A del Webb or Khov community is much needed in this area. There are many seniors that would like to buy in a 55 and older community and still live in Rancho. 58. Please rename the Biane Library to someone else. 25. If you would like to receive updates regarding the Consolidated Plan process, please input your email address, or other contact information below. Note: Personal information omitted for privacy. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 173 Page 305 City of Rancho Cucamonga 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2025 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021 APPENDIX C Grantee Unique Appendices 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 174 Page 306 Appendix C - Grantee Unique Appendices Rancho Cucamonga Low -Mod Area Map BG2 B.G1 _ 020.21 B,G.1 020.11 ..._.,_ 020, 024.14 -1 - 920.18 020.19 B.G. i s - _ G.1 , B.G.2 B.G 2 B.G.! 020.13 _- B.G.2- - gG 2 020.21 - _ - G 2 BG.2 B.6.4 . B.G.1 B.G.2 B.G2 NJ _ B.G.2 020.20 - 1 B.G.1 B,G.1 920.15 020.23 020.25 B,G.3' B.6,2 020:3t 020.33 B.� 3 B.G. B.G.1 3.G. B,G, 1 9atto. 020.35 - B.G.1 B G.2 B G. 2 B.G, t 008.12 _ 020.16 0.27 020.28 G'2' 020.34 02 BG 020:38 BG.3 BG.2 8.G.1 m B.G.1 B.G.1 W BG2 BG.2 B G 2 021.03 BG -3 021.07 1 02t.01 B.G. t 3.0.1 021.05 B,G. m 022.07 -, 021.10 -- B £ BG' 013.11 2G1 BG2 1,RAM���9 City of Rancho Cucamonga CDBG - LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA MAP LEGEND: CITY BOUNDARY O LOW AND MODERATE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS O CENSUS TRACK O BLOCK GROUP 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices B.G. 3 1X.6x 3 le.zx X o.v1 5 10.3Y 9w9a z 1:.9x 9w9u 1 9.9z 023.04 9oxselX z 13.EY B.G.2 9v9 5v..x oo Xu�c se sz 0!016 l 19.1Y aIo oo19n 1 9.9x 9oz9n x 9.oe% 9oz9ve 9 e�iniv i Ee .: 99se19 x 1e.fix aoz9ly 5I.SY �s s% »5Y 991e1y 3 3..OY 00lOE9 16.1% 001619 z u.9. 001019 . IO,6Y 1w1 fi.vx 00lOEl 3 13.9% fio16u 5 19.ex fi.1.1 056 eelOE9 1 11.9x 001019 1 Iq.i% 11 00!103 S 50.e% o9xa 9. se.1x 69zzaE 3 9o:v9 69239. XOBM •Batln4r�aryX9an1E¢o61m [unnrnry � V. F1'MIAEie{L'mAm�lepe-.V 19n 175 Page 307 Rancho Cucamonga Homeless Assistance Providers Affirming Community Initiatives 9791 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 609-1475 Website: www.aciministries.com Beauty for Ashes -Aftercare Program 9791 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2781 extension 2365 Email: deejack7@gmail.com Inland Counties Legal Services Inc. 10601 Civic Center Drive, #200 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 980-0982 Website: www.inlandlegal.org Inland Empire United Way 9624 Hermosa Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 980-2857 Website: www.ieuw.org Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board 10681 Foothill Blvd., Suite 101 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (800) 321-0911 extension 114 R.C. Family Resource Center 9791 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 477-2781 Website: www.cityofrc.us/cityhall/cs/parks/facility/resource.asp 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 176 Page 308 Countywide Resources 2-1-1 2-1-1 is a free and confidential service, available 24 hours a day, providing information and resources for health and social services in San Bernardino County. Call 2-1-1 for additional service providers in your area or the website at www.211 sb.com Community Action Partnership of San Bernardino County (CAPSBC) - (909) 723-1500 CAPSBC administers various programs to assist the low-income population throughout San Bernardino County. More information available at www.capsbc.org Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) - 1 (866) 901-3212 DCSS assists with establishing, modifying and enforcing court orders for Child Support, locating parents, establishing paternity, and collecting and distributing child support and spousal support payments. More information available at www.sbcounty.gov/dcss Department of Behavioral Health (DBH) - Access Unit - 1 (888) 743-1478 or (909) 381-2420 A 24/7 call center comprised of professional staff that provide widespread linkages to behavioral health services Public Health Information - 1 (800) 782-4264 Public Health provides community and preventive health services that promote and improve the health, safety, wellbeing and quality of life of county residents and visitors. San Bernardino County Superintendent of Schools (SBCSS) - (909) 386-2634 SBCSS Provides information about services and countywide programs and activities for students. www.sbcss.k12.ca.us Social Security Administration - (SSA) - 1 (800)-772-1213 - TTY - 1 (800) 325-0778 Social Security Administration provides information on applying for Retirement, Medicare, Disability Benefits and a Social Security card. Other services available through SSA can be found at www.ssa.gov Transitional Assistance Department (TAD) - (909) 388-0245 TAD administers financial support programs to persons in need of financial, nutritional and/or medical assistance. 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan: Appendices 177 Page 309 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Draft 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan Draft 2020-2021 Annual Action Plan April 15, 2020 Topics • Overview of Consolidated Plan • Anticipated Resources • Priority Needs • Strategic Plan Goals • 2020-2021 Action Plan Overview of Consolidated Plan • Five-year strategy to carry out the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs. • Submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions. • Emphasizes participatory process among residents, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders. • Management tool to assess performance and track results from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. Overview of Consolidated Plan Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Jirec ocal Strate' HUD provides these grants The Consolidated Plan is a on a formula basis to Cities five-year strategy for the like Rancho Cucamonga to investment of CDBG funds carry out eligible to address high priority community development housing and community activities. development needs. MCITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONG Anticipated Resources 2020-2021 capped $205,626 $154,219 $668,286 2021-2022 at 15% $205,626 $154,219 $668,286 2022-2023 $205,626 $154,219 $668,286 2023-2024 $205,626 $154,219 $668,286 2024-2025 $205,626 $154,219 $668,286 Total $1,028,130 $771,095 $3,341,430 Administrative capped at 20% of grant Public Service capped at 15% of grant $1,028,131 $1,028,131 $1,028,131 $1,028,131 $1,028,131 $5,140,655 Priority Needs Preserve the Supply of Affordable Housing Equal Access to Housing Opportunities Provide Public Services for Low- and Moderate -Income Residents *L Improve Public Facilities and Infrastructure • Address Barriers to Accessibility Priority Need 1 Preserve the supply of As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of affordable housing housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of concern for low- and moderate -income homeowners who are generally not in a financial position to properly maintain their homes. Priority Need 2 Equal access to housing All recipients of federal housing and community opportunities development assistance such as CDBG must take actions to affirmatively further fair housing choice within their communities. The City of Rancho Cucamonga will certify its compliance with HUD's requirement to affirmatively further fair housing choice in each Annual Action Plan requesting an annual allocation of CDBG funds. Priority Need 3 Provide public services Consultation with organizations that provide a range of for low- and moderate- public services targeted to low- and moderate -income income residents residents revealed the need for public services addressing a variety of needs including those associated with health, nutrition, affordable childcare, affordable housing, education, transportation and recreation for children, youth, families and seniors living in Rancho Cucamonga. Priority Need 4 Priority --. Description Improve public facilities The City of Rancho Cucamonga annual Capital and infrastructure Improvements Program establishes the public facilities and improvements needs of the City's parks and recreational facilities, including general improvements and accessibility improvements. Priority Need 5 Address barriers to Assessment of City public facilities revealed a need for the accessibility installation of accessibility features to ensure that public buildings are accessible to all persons. Barriers to accessibility were identified at various public facilities, including but not limited to, building entrances that are not wheelchair accessible, service counters that are not wheelchair accessible, lack of ADA compliant door hardware, restrooms lacking wheelchair accessible lavatories, fixtures and ADA compliant water closets, ramps and steps lacking ADA compliant handrails, drinking fountains that are not wheelchair accessible and non -ADA compliant signage. Strategic Plan Goals ....Ir fforclable Housing Preservation Fair Housing Services Public Services [public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Strategic Plan Goal 1 Description: Preserve the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households through housing rehabilitation activities. Anticipated Outcomes: Homeowner housing rehabilitation of 100 housing units. Funding: $2,000,000 Start Year: End Year: Priority Need Category: 1111VIII 2024 Need 1 Affordable Housing Strategic Plan Goal 2 Funding: $100,000 Start Year: 2020 End Year: 2024 Priority Need: Need 2 Category: Affordable Housing Description: Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination and landlord -tenant mediation services. The CDBG Administration activity funding for five years is also represented under this goal. Anticipated Outcomes: Assist 2,000 persons. Strategic Plan Goal 3 Description: Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents including but not limited to those concerned with food, essential services, transportation, health, recreation and employment. Anticipated Outcomes: Funding: $595,000 Start Year: End Year: 2020 2024 Public service assistance to 5,000 persons Priority Need: Need 3 Category: Non -Housing Community Development Strategic Plan Goal 4 Funding: $1,517,525 Start Year: End Year: Priority Need: Category: 2020 2024 Need 4 and 5 Non -Housing Community Development Description: Improve City of Rancho Cucamonga public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate -income people or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate - income such as elderly people and disabled adults as well as residents of low- and moderate -income housing. This strategy includes the installation of infrastructure in support of affordable housing. Anticipated Outcomes: Assist 25,000 persons. 2020-2021 Action Plan The Consolidated Plan is carried out through annual Action Plans. The Action Plan provides a summary of the projects that will be implemented each year to address the priority needs and specific goals identified by the Consolidated Plan. 2020-2021 Action Plan The City will receive $1,028,131 of CDBG funds for program year 2020-2021. Program Administration $205,626 Public Service $133,000 Capital $1,562,000 Total: $1,900,626 The City has $872,495 available in prior year resources 2020-2021 Administration CDBG Program Administration Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board: Fair Housing Services Sub -Total: $185,626 $20,000 $205,626 2020-2021 Public Service City of Rancho Cucamonga: Bringing Health Home $17,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: CASA $12,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Food Bank $15,000 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Senior Activities $14,000 YMCA: Senior Transportation $20,000 House of Ruth: Domestic Violence Services and Protection $10,000 Family Service Association: Senior Nutrition $15,000 Foothill Family Shelter: Help Desk $7,500 Foothill Family Shelter: 120 -Day Stepping Stones Program $7,500 Inland Valley Hope Partners: Food Security / Family Stabilization $15,000 Sub -Total: $133,000 2020-2021 Capital City of Rancho Cucamonga: Home Improvements Program City of Rancho Cucamonga: School Crosswalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Foothill Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Pecan Avenue Street Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Westerly Sidewalk Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Whittram Street Improvements City of Rancho Cucamonga: Sidewalk Grinding City of Rancho Cucamonga: Graffiti Removal Sub -Total: Ham $83,500 $2,800 $800,000 $15,000 $200,000 $45,700 $15,000 $1,562,000 Next Steps Amend the Draft 2020-2021 Action Plan to: • Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Senior Activities public service program in the amount of $14,000; • Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sidewalk Grinding project in the amount of $45,700; • Add the City of Rancho Cucamonga Graffiti Removal project in the amount of $15,000; and • Modify the funding for the Pecan Avenue Street Improvements project to reflect a total of $800,000. Next Steps Staff recommends the City Council approve and adopt the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan, 2020-2021 Action Plan, and 2020-2024 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan and 2020-2021 Action Plan are due to HUD by May 15, 2020. DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017 -00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018 -00473 — PAUL BARDOS, APPLICANT. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 4,118 SQUARE FOOT TWO STORY, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE AND A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS UP TO 5 FEET AND 2 INCHES HIGH ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA APN: 0207- - 631- 03. A MINOR EXCEPTION WAS ALSO REQUESTED TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT FOR RETAINING WALLS IN THE ZONE. THIS ITEM WAS DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND THE CITY'S CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(4) AS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN REJECTED OR DISAPPROVED (THIS ITEM WAS CONTINUED FROM THE FEBRUARY 19, 2020 CITY COUNCIL MEETING). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council continue the appeal of Hillside Design Review DRC2017- 00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 to the City Council meeting on May 20, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. ANALYSIS: The applicant lives out of the State and is requesting the continuance due to Covid 19 travel restrictions. Attached is the original March 18, 2020 Staff Report. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - 2/19/20 CC Staff Report With Exhibits Page 310 DATE: February 19, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS, APPLICANT. THIS PROJECT CONSISTS OF A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 4,118 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE AND A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS UP TO 5 -FEET AND 2 - INCHES HIGH ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA - APN: 0207-631-03. A MINOR EXCEPTION WAS ALSO REQUESTED TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT LIMIT FOR RETAINING WALLS IN THE ZONE. THIS ITEM WAS DETERMINED TO BE EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND THE CITY'S CEQA GUIDELINES PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061(B)(4) AS A PROJECT THAT HAS BEEN REJECTED OR DISAPPROVED. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council deny appeal DRC2019-00975 and uphold the decision by the Planning Commission to deny Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 through the adoption of the attached resolutions of denial. BACKGROUND: Project Description: The applicant proposed to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence that includes a 771 square foot attached three -car garage along with 374 square feet of porches and decks. The 15,430 square foot project site (Lot 13 of Tract 10035) is located on the south side of Camino Predera, one lot to the east of the existing residence at 8045 Camino Predera, in the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. Review Process Timeline: The Hillside Design Review application for the project was submitted to the City on March 22, 2017. City Staff processed the application and during several cycles of review requested that the applicant provide additional information about the project and revise the design of the house to ensure compliance with the General Plan and Development Code. The City deemed the application "Complete" for processing purposes in September 2019. Page 349 The Planning Commission reviewed Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. At that meeting, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to have staff draft a resolution of denial for the subject entitlements for their action at the following Planning Commission meeting. The resolutions of denial for Hillside Development Review DRC2018-00473 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 were placed on December 11, 2019, Planning Commission Consent Calendar, which was approved without comment. The applicant appealed the Planning Commission decision on December 19, 2019, within the required 10 -day appeal period. ANALYSIS: Resident Concerns: The residents along Camino Predera raised concerns related to the project at the June 10, 2019, Neighborhood Meeting; at the October 15, 2019, Design Review Committee meeting; and at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. The issues raised by the residents were related to building height, building setbacks and the overall size of the structure, each of which they believed was out of character to the existing neighborhood and the intent of the Hillside Design regulations. While the proposed single-family residence complies with the minimum development requirements of the Development Code, staff did not support the project based on building size/massing, building width/setbacks, and General Plan Compatibility. A detailed description and analysis of the project have been provided in the Staff Report that was presented to the Planning Commission on November 13, 2019 included with this staff report as Attachment 1. New Standards: It should be noted that the Planning Department has been working with the residents of the Red Hill neighborhood to develop development standards to address the long-standing issues related to the development of the 14 remaining vacant lots along Camino Predera. Staff hosted two separate meetings with the Red Hill residents on August 8, 2019, and on September 9, 2019. Based on comments received at these two meetings, it was determined that the residents were only interested in City developing new development standards for the vacant lots along Camino Predera. These updated standards were presented to the Planning Commission on January 22, 2020, as Municipal Code Amendment DRC2020-00004. At that meeting, both the existing residents and the vacant lot owners raised concerns about the proposed standards. The Planning Commission deliberated and asked staff to schedule an additional meeting with the residents along Camino Predera to determine whether a compromise could be reached. That meeting was held in the Tri -Community room of City Hall on January 30, 2020, with approximately 17 residents in attendance. This meeting concluded with neither the existing residents nor the vacant lot owners finding common ground on the major issue of building height or building setbacks. The residents did ask for more time to resolve the outstanding issues. It is important to note that the Camino Predera residents are aware that their neighbors may continue to submit applications for new homes like this one, and that any delay in adopting new regulations will result in these projects being reviewed under current standards. All of the neighbors were willing to go through the projects one by one in exchange for having more discussion about the standards. Therefore, staff determined that the Planning Commission public hearing for the Municipal Code Amendment with the new standards should be continued to an unspecified date to provide the residents with more time to work the unresolved issues. Mr. Bardos requested that his appeal move ahead to City Council tonight to avoid further delay. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed by an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City Page 348 services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is significantly larger than those in the surrounding neighborhood, and the proposed residence is being built to the minimum side yard setbacks, increase the appearance of overbuilding the lot. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - 11/13/19 PC Staff Report Attachment 2 - 12/11/19 PC Staff Report Attachment 3 -CC HDR Reso Attachment 4 - CC ME Reso Page 386 DATE: November 13, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage and a request to construct retaining walls up to 5 -feet and 2 -inches high on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission direct staff to prepare a resolution of denial for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and a resolution of denial without prejudice for Minor Exception DRC2018. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 15,430 square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera, within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 80 feet along the north and south property lines, 195 feet along the east property line and 189 feet along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 1,301 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line and an elevation of approximately 1,260 feet as measured along the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 41 feet. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 3941 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District Page 3941 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. November 13, 2019 Page 2 West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached three -car 771 square foot garage and 374 square feet of porches and decks on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (The maximum cut of fill that can be permitted adminstratively by the Planning Director is 5 feet). The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage doors facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17.122.020.C.1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. The project complies with the minimum current development requirements of the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District except that the project includes retaining walls over 4 feet in height which necessitates the approval of a Minor Exception for wall height. The following table provide an overview of project compliance with the Development Code (it should be noted that the City is in the process of developing new development criteria for Camino Predera): Development Criteria Requirement Proposed Compliant? Front Yard Setback 37 feet 60 feet Yes Side Yard Setbacks 5 and 10 feet 5 and 10 feet Yes Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 85 feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 percent 32 percent Yes Building Height Overall 30 feet 30 feet Yes Building Height at Curb Face 10.5 feet N/A Retaining Wall Height 4 feet max 5 feet No** Cut/Fill 5 feet 8* Feet *Grading in Excess of 5 feet Requires Planning Commission Approval **Applicant has submitted Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the additional wall height Page 380 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 3 An existing combination wall and wrought iron fence is located along the west property line that was constructed with the development of the single-family residence to the west. The applicant proposes an up to 4 -foot retaining wall topped by a 5 -foot wrought -iron fence along the east property line. A 6 -foot -high wrought fence is proposed along the south elevation. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Section 17.122.020.E., which encourages the use of open -view fencing and having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed grading design includes 784 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,296 feet and the lower garage pad at an elevation of 1,286, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D. 1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 -foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north -south and two east -west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30 -foot height requirement. The height of the residence ranges from approximately 10 -feet and 6 -inches, along the east side of the residence, to 6 - feet and 11 -inches, along the west side of the residence, as measured above curb face on Camino Predera. The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the installation of a permanent irrigation system landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or within a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The rear yard includes slope planting to prevent erosion. Neighborhood Concerns and Staff Analysis: Over the years, residents along Camino Predera have raised concerns related to the development of remaining undeveloped lots of Tract 10035. The overriding concern has been that the proposed residences are out of character with the existing neighborhood based on building size/massing, building height and building width (side setbacks). These same issues were raised by the residents related to the proposed project at the June 10, 2019, Neighborhood Meeting and again at the October 15, 2019, Design Review Committee meeting. As a result of these persistent neighborhood concerns, and in response to the subject development application, staff attempted to quantify certain characteristics, namely building size and massing, in order to identify what might be considered a compatible development within the neighborhood. To accomplish this, staff reviewed building permits issued by the City for each property within the tract. Where building permits were not available (in two instances), data was used from the Property Information Management System (PIMS) hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's office. Staff notes that building size referenced in this report is inclusive of garages, patios, porches, etc., to account for massing which has been identified as a primary concern of the neighborhood. All data gathered regarding building square footage is approximate and has been organized into a spreadsheet which provides the average size of residences in the tract currently, as well as the average size of houses by decade since the tract was developed. Page 380 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 4 Further, since development along the southside of Camino Predera has been of particular concern to neighborhood residents, data collected by staff also provides the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera. This spreadsheet is included with this report as Exhibit E. The applicant has provided documentation showing two efforts to address concerns. First, the building could have been designed so that the top elevation is 14 feet above the street, whereas the applicant is only proposing 10 feet 6 inches above the street. Second, the eave has been truncated on the east and west, reducing the profile of the roof. Staff notes that while the Development Code does not provide an objective definition of the term "compatibility," the proposed development requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 17.16.140.B.1 and Section 17.122.020.G.i of the Development Code. As such, certain findings are required to be made, including a finding that a proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan (Section 17.16.140.F.1). While staff acknowledges that height and massing could be even greater, staff feels that the applicant could further reduce the roof height. As such, staff does not support the project for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035 was approved by Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. As of 2019, 21 lots within the tract had been developed, with 3 more lots having been approved for development as recent as 2018 and 2019. 14 lots remain undeveloped, each of which are located on the south side of Camino Predera. Of the built residences in Tract 10035, 7 were built in the 1980s, 1 was built in the 1990s, 13 were built in the 2000s, and 3 houses have been approved in the 2010s, one of which is currently under construction. Generally, the average size of houses in Tract 10035 have increased from 3,128 square feet in the 1980s to an average of 4,237 square feet for those projects approved in the 2010s. This increase in size over time would seem to support certain neighborhood concerns that recent development has been out of character for the neighborhood. Based off building permits and PIMS data, which again, for the purposes of this review includes the cumulative building square footage of garages, patios and porches, etc., the average sized residence in Tract 10035 currently is approximately 3,912 square feet. Further, the average size for residences along the south side of Camino Predera, is slightly larger at 3,918 square feet. At 4,889 square feet of living and garage area, the proposed residence is larger than the average residence in the tract (3,912 square feet), larger than the average sized residence along the south side of Camino Predera (3,918 square feet), and larger than the average residence approved during the 2010s (4,237 square feet). Notably, when including porches and decks to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permits and PIMS data (374 square feet proposed), the proposed residence increases to 5,263 square feet. Further, the massing of the proposed residence is accentuated by the height of the roof peak which is 10 feet and 6 inches above the curb face on Camino Predera. Staff has recommended to the applicant that the appearance of massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. Page 390 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 5 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, which conflicts with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. It should be noted that staff is currently considering amendments to the development code to increase minimum setbacks and reduce building height maximums within the Camino Predera neighborhood in a direct effort to address persistent neighborhood concerns regarding these development standards. It is anticipated that these code changes will be ready for public hearings within the coming months. 3. General Plan Compatibility: Staff asserts that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." As evidenced by comments received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019, and considering long-standing concerns regarding the scale of development proposed both within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera, the proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. Staff acknowledges that the proposed project will develop a vacant lot which might provide an economic benefit to the property owner, however building permit and PIMS data gathered for this report reflect that the average size of residences within Tract 10035 have increased since the tract was approved in the 1980s, and that the proposed project is larger than the average residence in the tract which would further exacerbate this trend. Staff contends that this noted growth in average house size correlates to the persistent neighborhood concerns. B. Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473): The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 -feet with a minimum 3 -foot separation between the stepped walls. The project includes retaining walls up to 5 feet -2 inches in height. The additional retaining wall height is necessary to lower the height of the foundation of the residence in order to reduce the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. The applicant has filed Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 requesting the additional retaining wall height. A Minor Exception permits an additional 2 feet above the maximum permitted wall height. While staff supports the applicant's intent to lower the height of the proposed single-family residence, staff cannot support the proposed Minor Exception as the project is not consistent with the intent of the General Plan to "promote complementary infill development." The findings of facts below do not support the necessary findings, which are required by the Development Code: Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. Fact: The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related Hillside Design Review (DRC2017- Page 348 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 6 00244) is for a 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact: The proposed single-family residences is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact: The proposed increase in the maximum permitted retaining wall height is necessary to lower the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. Staff supports increasing the retaining wall heights on the project site to further reduce the height of the residence as seen from Camino Predera. Finding: The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact: The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Wimberly and McIntosh) on October 22, 2019. A resident read a letter in opposition to the project during the public comment portion of the meeting. Staff presented the project and outlined the reasons why the project was not being supported as presented including lack of conformance with the intent of the Hillside Design Guidelines, neighborhood compatibility, and inconsistency with the General Plan. Staff also noted that the side elevations of the proposed residence should be enhanced by adding additional horizontal siding to match the front and rear elevations. The Committee stated that they were generally in support of the architecture of the proposed residence, but in the context of this specific location, they understood the neighbor's concerns and recommended that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission without a recommendation for review by the full Planning Commission. The applicant did agree to add the requested horizontal siding to the side elevations of the residence to match the front and rear elevations. Those changes are reflected in the building elevations attached to this report (Exhibit B). Page 342 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 7 D. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting in the Rains Room at City Hall on June 10, 2019, with approximately 20 persons in attendance. The applicant provided a general overview of the project and fielded questions. The attendees raised concerns related to the building height as seen from Camino Predera, the width of the residence (built to the minimum 5- and 10 -foot setbacks), and the size of the residence as compared to older homes along Camino Predera. The applicant responded that lowering the residence would steepen the driveway to the point that it would be difficult to navigate, that reducing the width of the residence would make it difficult to construct a 3 -car garage and that the size of the residence is in keeping with the existing residences most recently constructed along Camino Predera. The neighbors stated that the size of the recently constructed residences along Camino Predera were not in keeping with the intent of Hillside Design regulations and were too large compared to the older residences constructed along the street. E. Public Art: Residential development projects of fewer than 4 units are exempt from the public art requirement. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures), which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The project also qualifies as a Class 5 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15305, which covers minor alterations in land use limitations including allowing additional wall height due to onsite grades. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed by an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project, the project is not consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The Land Use element within the General Plan (Chapter 2) encourages infill development that facilitates sustainable and attractive development that complements the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed single-family residence is significantly larger than those in the surrounding neighborhood, and the proposed residence is being built to the minimum side yard setbacks, increase the appearance of overbuilding the lot. Page 362 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT HDR DRC2017-00244 & ME DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS November 13, 2019 Page 8 CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. To date, no comment/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Correspondences Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Comments (October 15, 2019) and Action Agenda Exhibit E - Tract 10035 Data Exhibit F - Tract Map 10035 Page 3113 e£Lls "VVNOWVOM� OH"N ezzws n 7n L%L9-146 (6e5) V?J3MSJ oNM1JV� Gees h4115 V7 'CNrWn a Q si4NW 'LVm ONUM N 9591 3uo�5ILf 7N1ro�alN 01mg Nr3115 :31111 a B ii Jai s§ R m —7ai- IAQa a5aa5a bbbbbbb ,Its o e � ! V-t�r T ,1 �yO �'or Q axe IRDS ci 4 Jy J ONIWVID Exhibit B �L 9 o 12 320 e 340 MUG V0 •V%m"nO omowN er:twi k:)n LGL9-196 (UM) V213O3Nd ONt4V] V09 PAIS "'QNV1dl1 � ' � Q i 3WOli ,NVWSiiVa7~ W019"M3N I, IVm eN14Q3a N 969. �NI'No11vna1sNo� soaave N Z VNINWNSN MNJ 3lt�t NSQ-�in� v s YS e 340 ME) aE�i6 a� 'aeNOWv�n� orr�Na� eases • �n LsLg-iss uses) � aaaaaad oNW1a0 seessevols bear. a� 'aNaldn .Lam IDNo032� N g5gl a ` Q� 3woH ,NaW51dp21O,, Wolsmam3N �vl 'No!!MNIGN= 9006ae C 9NISaMa k 1NON 3i1�1 rn�ns a ME) BCL16 VO VWWr�m or, va O Btt466 a an L6L9-146 (6B6) daga3ad orQ 5f04 r4L16 "'arida . s Q 1.dm �rllaaaa N 9691 S 3WOH ,f4vwSi4m). WoigoaaGN aril 'r>o�arlassr�m sooan n NOIIIVA31 1NO?�� Mlu :a3rnmg q � e 308 M16 V:)'V9NOWV= OMONbtk BIt5B5 p 71i 1619-i86(6B6) btk3Q3ad ONIWd7 SfiBB 4BLIG dO ONp wn Q Isrw xvm 9NI�c33z1 N glial r �, 3WCH WDIS M3N 7NI'NOl1�12115NO7 5oaav9 a NV Icl 80014 QNZ ;31111 s3a'IinA e 308 m m efLl6 b7 'YeNOW v�M1� Oh17Nt121 eZLSeS C on L6L9-186 (686) r t+21363t1d ON!•Id� 5 88 ram b:) '(Wi4in' Y Q f fl 5d0015121dW LVM 8 UOSal N 9691 � � NVId NDO-W 3WOH W0170 m SNI 'N011WSIS= WCC VO a r m -751 .19NU 31111 :N3cnnIa 1-t-- m m M1 l% Y f fl O r m -751 a I c I I I m I I r -J I I Jif I r I obi a Ix I IL I m I I I � Y EE� e Y -1 I M � fu I I LL. I *_ I P.,q 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I e I � MUG V3'VIvWWVWo OHONVN elt9e5 a,Dn L6L9-.95 (6e6) W VNRC13NCi ONUVIO 5se9 Mira V7 .04v n � Q 3WOHH WOISM rn3N V�1lwo ± N011b`/�3 N17�N :31lis �tl NOLL wasve d GI :s3aling 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I e I � e 363 eELM d7 .�@NOY1d�T17 Oh17NVs @ltwti N W1 LrM-WS (G@6) 0 A VS9C1RNc1 ON!WIn Seat 49LI6 b0 �n Isowis'l+a J,vm ON60sms N 9641 NOLVA313 1Sb3 3WOk W015n7�f�3N ONI'TIOLLOfi211SN0750a21d9 a N :3'11!1 :momma e 363 e �9� 86116 b7 'C%NRNb7R? ON7Nd2i ezzw4 #71 LGL9-.A6 (686) ba3a32k 5dOR15 2i "L16 b� ,aqv dR ; Q *� �{ sNo�l � � �s�m 3WOM NO19n OGN 7M 'NOlL alSNNO:) WSNUMN a 8 W in Y :31111 Naming a � e �9� e �A6 6£li6 b7'b6N0YlV?n� ott�Nba 6ttwi a Sn LGL9-146 (666) 7 Va3a3a sd�oo s PRIG.VD'QNVrfc1n 6 >icegNVOW I IfA'7NUCSS N 9591 N'd'ld SOON 3waN wo:sn7 m3M oNi 'NouonaisNoo sooade e �A6 .. O j 'his'• �' =aaEta 51 g o dog d Ilk I fal 1i Jai 11 honE= s Rt � s �a!� i Q �� d kdi€ �� � l�6 1 � w Z5 lk :3 It V iaadza a ��R��d ar�Agka it`��4�7k ney9 reg t� R LQ0 M h !`� ped��„8 � a i cti ' ,i t_ JillISA} � Ej •�J : Jy� �l�k�Yt'si,�li �� J��}- i f+J; 3 �j {+I :� � �f_!i4 rJ �7 s ! � ;i � °t rLu 3C. to tit�� i� � �}•i, � {# I� 3i� �i���;�� f�j{�;i �; � ! � F � ' # ` j t7 I���€���1(.+��f�f.•'!!?�l��=f��s1El=_Ec{%_�_} �a�i.��:,����1f��:.�in�.Iai=J-��--?ri3a __ � �: � ,� �s� It A 1 .11 i ag e �9� E e lMji 3Ala 031813313 DIdIDHd16 p 59zl -4 uBZi �p er LI E tj LSI } r $ d� 71 -,Uri 9U ��# J A to Y ?• 2 is ry �° °$•� " xsr aLs Lx3 ` a yJ nauns 'a 6 r _ �V83038d ONMV0 t ik o g 3 R o ❑ `c z o U 5 0 a h . oil( e� F� lei 31 hil isNO { E E � E z RI 4 R 1 I I 4 ■ � 11UMMMUMMM1M1M NVIc! VNIINVIci OSLIs VO VONOWdono Ohl7NYNx b zk3G3Zld ONIW v 5f06v SdOOiS .lzib'W 3WOH WOMO m3N 3-1111 BLZSBS q 7fi L6L9-166 d6L 16 1YO 'dNVldf1 SNI 'No�drn SNOV Si N 4641 �i�n�.LisNo� 5oaav� -?amine 3 = W �- ° ku wcq i � ■ � 11UMMMUMMM1M1M , 0000000000 UU2:IIIIII ooa SII 000 X11 e� Bm B�ISII�IIIIIII ����111111 SII SII � 392 MUG V:) VIDNOL11 OM ON7NdJ @LL564i a on L6L9-185 (roes) VS3ti32id ON1W'v'O 9E99 1,8LI5 VO 'aNV-Wn J 31-IOSC ISL VW Adm VNIGGaN N 9691 'NOI1vflalsw7 7 j 04 NV'lcl VNI1NVIc1 ONI SOdZid'9 Q 41 3 :��i� :iiaa�ing in 392 Od �0 /A�DOC 11'BIl J CONSTRUCTION October 7, 2019 The City Of Rancho Cucamonga Attn: Mr. John Gillison, City Manager 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: CAMINO PREDERA Dear Mr. Gillison, I write to you regarding several matters that have generally been progressing over time in the approval process of properties on Camino Predera and the circumstances specifically surrounding our attempts at gaining approvals for a new single-family residence at 8035 Camino Predera that I believe now give rise to this letter. I am reaching out to city administration and city decision makers to once and for all resolve what are now polarizing issues for neighbors, and to intervene to reduce the extraordinary delays taking place in processing entitlements through to final approval on the street. These issues place both an unreasonable financial and emotional burden on applicants causing harm and they have no equivalent anywhere else in the city. It appears from my numerous discussion with staff that the submittal of DRC2018-00244 for 8035 Camino Predera ("the Submittal") is being generally construed and in some way joined with the proposed future changes to the development code currently under review by staff. Although I do not believe the Submittal is currently subject to any currently proposed or future changes (that as of the date of this writing have not been formally published and are still in the internal discussion stage by staff) there stills seems to be considerable abstruseness in the relevance of the proposed changes to the Submittal. As you may or not know I have attended all of the neighborhood meetings and have heard the verbal recommendations of staff and considered the points in its PowerPoint presentation with the intention of participating in neighborhood discussion and incorporating any reasonable recommendations into our current Submittal. Given the current craftsman style architectural of this project and the numerous design changes incorporated into it over the past 31 months in reviews and re -reviews, I have found none of the proposed code changes to be readily able to be included in our current designs. It is for this reason and the others that I will outline here that we are continuing on in the submittal process to final approval. Prior to beginning any further comments, I would like to provide a brief summary of Bardos Construction's building history. Our first projects in RC were started before the community was incorporated as a City. Over the past 45 years we have constructed numerous residential Exhibit C Page 350 and commercial projects to include two homes on Camino Predera at 8034 and 8054, and also the corporate headquarters of the then Mercy Ambulance Service (now AMR) to include it's lifesaving 911 dispatch center on Center Street. These are in addition to the Mercy Air's/City's joint collaboration to construct a medivac helipad site at Rancho Cucamonga's Fire Station #4 and Fire Training Facility on Milliken. Our projects include several new single-family residences in RC and the village of Claremont and if I'm not mistaken we still have the accolade of having built more new homes in the Claremont Village over the past 25 years than any other builder. We were recognized with several awards for our work there as well as is similarly true with other communities in the Inland Empire. 1 have also worked personally for the State's Licensing Board in nearly a thousand investigations giving expert opinions on those investigations in administrative, civil and criminal proceedings, and I have given testimony before the CA State Legislature on matters relevant to the construction industry. I therefore write these comments as both an applicant and an experienced and knowledgeable member of my profession. Through my many discussions, emails with staff and neighboring residents in addition to a research of the issues through the City's online archives, I have come to be familiar with both the neighbor's concerns and the recommendations of staff in addressing them. As I currently understand the neighbor's objections as both viewed through the record and through my personal contacts and after my wife and I lived on Camino Predera for more than 10 years, the issues are unquestionably solely focused on views of the property owners on the north side of Camino Predera being obstructed by the development of the remaining vacant lots on the south side of the street. These objections have been expressed on many occasions and are codified in the recorded a portion of which is being included here to illustrate a point that begins as far back as early 2001: IF 1AVf71ror7rR"J,'1TTr'!11I! �11II II l[ 1! !I_C11_ R110 Lynn Massey, 8088 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, thanked the Commission for allowing him to present his concerns. He thought the facts presented were misleading. He showed a picture of his house and indicated that the level of sight from his front door and his balcony Is equal or within 6 inches. He felt the line -of -site drawings were misleading because they show two different elevations for his house. He stated his view of the valley and city lights will be obstructed by homes on Lots 2 through 5. He fell that 75 percent of his view will be obstructed and that he will lose all of his view when trees are grown by the new homeowners. He read from two advertising flyers from Concordia Homes from other communities and several real estate advertisements which highlighted a view as one of their selling features. Mr. Massey stated the community is semi -custom homes with the majority being split level or single story. He thought the Commission originally requested single story homes but staff felt Concordia's proposal for two-story homes was feasible. He believed the property is better suited for split-level homes and that property values may not be increased because the new homes are not congruent with the community. He indicated that if the Commission approved the plan, it may be encouraging a civil matter between a voter, taxpayer, and citizen toward an entity that can't vote or pay taxes and is not in the community. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 I909f 981 —6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 394 Maior Issues: The following broad design Issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project: 1. The major issue for any house product proposed on the south side of the street is the concern of residents on the north side regarding potential view obstructions to the south. The proposed house is a true split level design that exhibits a single -story facing the street. This entry IeVel becomes the second floor as the structure continues down the slope. The two- story portion faces south down the slope. The house fits within the building envelope as required by the Hillside Development provisions. This correspondence is to register my continuing concern with what has been proposed and approved along one of the last remaining vestiges of the Red Hill area over the past several months. This correspondence is to formally request that careful study be given to impacts of the referenced and future development of this particular hillside area prior to any Design Review Approvals by either City staff or the Planning Commission. The Red Hill area Is one of the only areas ' within the southwestern portion of the City that allows a unique opportunity for residential development that can capitalize on the natural hip contours and still allow for views of the valley that can be shared by all with proper development of this area. t12- R 9 1- C& Planner's Rggort July 7,2004t i nil - M . Appeal 1&7.2004. While the approved design is well within the City Hillside standards, the appellants are requesting that the house, and others as may be proposed, be provided with a "lower profile" than is presently approved (Exhibit "A"). The assumed reason for the lower building profile is to preserve views from their house on the north side of the street. In a meeting with the Mayor and staff, the appellants stated that their desire is that the house be lowered so that only the roof is visible above street grade. DRC2015-00604 -Planning Commission Meeting - Semler - February 14, 2018: Renee Massy, a resident of Red Hill, clarified that she is not against something being built and she also fell in love with the view. She said their lot is between two homes but because of the curve in the road, the view will be obstructed ( Ms. Massey also spoke during public comment and wishes those comments to be included in the record. They are repeated below) Renee Massey, a resident of Red Hill, expressed concern regarding Item D6. She explained that the new home proposed to the south of her home will block their view of the valley. She asked in several meetings to share the view and they felt the owners should lower their home by 5 additional feet. She indicated that just meeting the requirements is 595 HALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 9BZ-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 3911 not enough and the value of her home will be lessened if the home is built as proposed and she believes she has not been heard". Appellants: Renne Massey addressed the City Council on the appeal submitted; spoke on the three reasons for their appeal which include the issue with compatibility, views, and accessory dwelling unit; she referred to two other appeals that were granted and displayed the lots she was referring to; spoke on the loss of views the new home will have on Mr. Rodriguez's property; and expressed concern with the design, height and incompatibility of the proposed home and displayed pictures of surrounding homes. m U CorrMondence Between AIi n n t 26.2019: From: H. Lynn Massey [Mailto: mass(fgmail,com] Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 9:38 AM To: Paul Cc: r w • Mary Subject: Plans Paul, Thank you for understanding about my daughter's cancer surgery. She is out of ICU... The Doctors removed a 9.5 pound mass and one kidney. We soil don't have the lab results on the mass. It's truly been a hectic 7-10 days. 1 admit I don't know your business... Just like you may not know what a suitable beta score on a balanced mutual fund should be for optimal growth with reduced downside volatility. I assume you agree... we are all experts in our chosen field. Here is what we know: 9 Please be aware that the Galvan's proect appeal was upheld by the City Council. They required them to reduce the overall height of the home by six feet. *Danny Dera's [Lot 3] house design that is currently under construction got neighborhood support and approval and the City Council were pleased with the neighbors support and his design. 9 Also the development code workshops and the pending amendment could be strong indicators that reduced profile is an issue supported by the City on Camino Predera. Here are some suggestions: 9 Please modify the design and placement of the home in order to reduce the proposed street profile. I m not as schooled in design as you but I believe this can be done easily by reducing or redesigning the roof to a lower profile design. NOT a flat roof, that doesn't keep with the style. You could move the pad further down the hill and away from the street. You should be able to use reasonable cuts and retaining walls to get this accomplished. • We would like you to provide a profile design that allows for "view sharing" with the neighbors across the street; your home as is could be a standard for future home construction. if you were building across the street from m home, I would lose a lot of my view. The "view sharing' Cm talking about should- 4 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 350 City lights not just blue sky. l believe you can accomplish this by reducing the size of the structure, increasing side yard setbacks and lowering the roof profile as suggestedabove. Paul, I know you're trying, but all of the nearby home owners who will be affected most by your design should be included in these emails. You took the time to come to us and I believe you need to take the time to go to them as a good faith gesture. As talented as you are and with your years of experience with design, I know with a little more "view sharing effort" you could get almost close to an undisputed support from the residents on Camino Predera. God Bless - Lynn & Renee Massey From: Paul To: H. Lynn Massey Cc: n r • Ma[y Subject: RE: Plans Date: Monday, August 26,2019 11:54:00 AM Lynn and Renee, Mary and I hope your daughter will recover fully and there will be no further complications for her in the future. I read your suggestions below and found them not very helpfulprimarily because they are based on subjective impressions of what you think can be done and because we have already done al/ of those things you have suggested. For instance, we nearly doubled thte distance of the house from the street than is required and have modified the 1s upper) floor to narrow it. Those were done quite some time ago in one or more of the 5 submittals after we showed you the initial plan. As for your thought about reducing the roof pitch, we're at the minimum the manufacturer allows (4:12) before their warranty is void and a tile roof will leak. The retaining wall heights of the design are at the maximum height allowed by the Code and the driveway slope is at the maximum too. I have tried my best to encourage you to seek the advice of a PE without success to make any contribution constructive and relevant to the technical requirements of the California Building and City's Development Codes and tailored to the unique topography of the lot. There are simply limitations on each of these lots individually that need to be taken into account. There is no "cookie cutter" approach that will work on every lot. What was done on Danny's lot can't be done on ours and any comparison of our lot to his or the Galvan submittal is gravely misplaced. Unless you're unwilling to consult with a PE to advise you I don't see how we can progress in this discussion past this point. As for the thought that we should reach out to others on the street, we did that with nearly everyone including you and Lynn and we heard no objections so we proceeded with another 5 submittals over 2 1h years that also went without comment. As for the thought that the city is in de facto agreement with you or that all of the neighbors agree with you that would be another mistaken assumption. There were many at the neighborhood meeting and at the recent development 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3531 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 299 meeting that do not support your views. All of the neighbors immediately affected by our submittal (except Chuck and Suzanne) are in support of our designs and in point of fact the Council denied your appeal of the Galvan residence as it did similarly with the preceding three others riled in the past. As for a beta score, the answer would be less than 1. if I know something about your industry, I think it only fair that I ask you to learn something about mine if it is in fact your intention to participate constructively. Best, Paul and Mary Without exception every application for development of the remaining vacant lots in Tract 10035 that are on the south side of Predera (and one on the north side — Galvan) have been uniformly opposed over the past 18 years by a very small group and there have been four appeals filed over the same period all of which were denied by the Council. Although there have been other submittals in the hillside overlay district of the Red Hill Community, none of those submittals outside the 10035 Tract have been attended or opposed by any of the objectors on Camino Predera. For instance, a submittal originally filed in December of 2018 for 7563 Alta Cuesta DRC2018-01014 for a new 4040 sq ft single-family home was unopposed and unattended at its DRC meeting in August of 2019. In less than 8 months the project on Alta Cuesta has gone from submittal to approvals where in comparison, all other projects submitted on Camino Predera have languished for literally years. DRC2018-01014 illustrates the singularity with which the appellants have focused their opposition. When the tract map for 10035 was recorded it included a controlling set of CC&R's2 intended to regulate the future development and ownership of the lots. After several buy/sell agreements were thereafter recorded transferring ownership of the tract to one or another developers over the years, Concordia Homes of Southern California eventually took possession of the remaining undeveloped lots after having successfully negotiated a change in the CC & R's with MacMain Associated, LLP in March of 2000. The change in the CC&R's removed the limitation on maximum height of the homes previously set at twenty four feet3 set out in the covenants of the CC&R's. By removing the height restriction Concordia was then allowed to ' A copy of the tract map for Tract 10035 is included hereto as Exhibit 1 A copy of the original recorded CC & R's is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 3 Attached in Exhibit 3 is a copy of the changes to the original CC & R's recorded on March 14, 2000 two weeks prior to close of escrow by Concordia. These revisions to the CC & R's removed the height limitation of 24' from the regulations, On March 31, 2000 Concordia tools title to the remaining undeveloped lots in Tract 10035. See grant deed dated March 31, 2000 attached as Exhibit 4. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-8797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 350 construct 2 -story homes that were within the development code standards still in force today, which they eventually did with the first three of the homes they built on lots 17, 19, and 20. All other provisions of the CC & R's remained unchanged to include two important provisions contained in §2.04 and §8.044. Section 2.04 reads in part: "... For purposes of this Section 2.04, an Owner's "view " shall be deemed to exclude any line of sight from such Owner's Lot which intersects or traverses any neighboring Lot which is of equal or greater elevation at the time the grading and initial construction of improvements of the Project is completed by Declarant. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to the Lot, hereby acknowledges that the line of sight from Lots in the Project at the time such Lots were originally offered far sale to the public by Declarant may be subject to subsequent obstruction as a result of future construction or plantings by Declarant or by other Owners pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Committee in accordance with this Section 2.04 and Article V of this Declaration. " [Emphasis added] And at §8.04 of the CC & R's: "Section 8.04 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the Project does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, condition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof." [Emphasis added] These two provisions expressly make the issue of view obstruction a private matter of dispute between the property owners. K i► 1 1 1 ► ►/ 11 ' I M ` l Given the long history of contention between property owners and the efforts of but a few of the residents of the Tract to involve the City there now appears to be a directive from the Council to staff to review the controversy and recommend Development Code changes to mitigate the issues. ° A reprinting for clarity of the two relevant sections of the CC & R's is included herewith as Exhibit S. 5 A copy of Planning Staffs PowerPoint presentation is attached herewith as Exhibit 6. As of the date of this writing it is the only documentation available that describes their intended recommendations to the Planning Commission. Many of the topics staff presented at the neighborhood meetings were supported by only a portion of the neighbors present. For that reason many of the property owners who objected have written to city administrators independently to codify their objections to staffs presumed recommendations. 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 9B 1 -6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3B3 1 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 3116 At the second neighborhood meeting staff proposed the following changes to the hillside overlay in a PowerPoint presentation. A formal recommendation has not yet been released to the public. Those points presented are as follows: 1) Increase sideyard setbacks from 5 and 10 to 10 and 15 2) Add a new regulation limiting the height of the roof above the street and that the buildings can be no higher than one story. 3) Orient long axis of roof perpendicular to street 4) Require varied front yard setbacks 5) Articulate with variable wall planes sj For lots on the south side of the street, the floor plan of the house may "inverted" so that the garage is at or near the street level and the other floors of the residential structure are below the garage Floor 7) Increase the maximum height of retaining walls to 8 feet without the need for a Variance or Minor Exception. a. Where higher walls are necessary, they shall be terraced with a minimum separation of 3 feet between wall faces. b. Retaining walls within the front yard setback will continue to be permitted up to a maximum height of 3 feet. c. Encourage non -cantilever type retaining walls such as gravity walls, with landscaping. 8) Due to the smaller lot areas, structures are not required to follow the contours of the land. 9) Where second stories are proposed, step back the wall plane of the second floor by 5 feet in the front and/or side. In addition to the above staff has articulated two other points verbally through discussion (1) the will of the community and (2) the character of the neighborhood. At the current time senior staff has indicated the area to be governed by the proposed changes would be limited exclusively to Tract 10035.6 Despite the talking points in staffs PowerPoint presentation and staffs apparent intentions to move forward with its same recommendations to be formalized as its recommendations to the Planning Commission, there was no agreement or majority opinion amongst the neighbors at the meeting and there was considerable opposition to the proposed changes with several speaking out against modifying the Development Code at all, believing there was no need for the changes. The will of the community has therefore not been established through quorum or 6 As mentioned previously no formal summary of Staff's recommended changes has been made public. statements made here are being derived from personal conversations with senior staff members. 8 595 HALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 981-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENSE #50522Q MULTIPLE AWARD WINNIN[3 LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 2811 majority other than it can be characterized as a genuine disagreement amongst property owners. The character of the community has also not been demonstrated through any statistical or impressionistic review. In past entitlement submittals over the years both planning commissioners and council members alike have commented on the record that the Red Hill community is eclectic and resistant to definition. However along Camino Predera the pattern in development has been to construct two-story homes that are ranging in square footage to between 3,088 to 6,175 square feet.? The average size of homes being built on the street over the past 18 years is just at 4,000 sq ft. Given the limited amount of properties that have either waterfront or views in California it is not surprising that these lots bring a premium in value and attract owners who desire larger living spaces and higher quality amenities in their homes. The character of the immediate community along Camino Predera then would appear to support larger homes that would take advantage of available views. The owners of vacant lots along Camino Predera would therefore be singled out from their predecessors and deprived of similar use of their property should many of the recommended changes be enacted. This depravation of property owner rights would be contrast to all other hillside overlay communities in the city and appears to have little justification or merit other than through neighborhood dissention. ion l Given the record, there is little support for any change in the development code particularly when appellant's unambiguous effort for the past 18 years has been to preserve their views at the expense of the vacant property landowner's rights on the south side of the street. "A landowner does not have any right of access to air, light, or view over adjacent property" has been public policy throughout the state since 1898 set both in statute and precedent8 and little has occurred to change that legal principle over the past 120 years. The CC & R's expressly agreed to by all of the owners within Tract 10035 only serves to reinforce and apply public policy in further detail as a binding private contract on the appellants and all others in the immediate Predera neighborhood. It is unfortunate that many of the proposed changes to the development code so far advanced could be easily construed to benefit one party over another in the disagreement and if enacted they unfairly burden the remaining vacant property owners with additional costs, regulations, and delays that deprive them of the implicit development rights bargained for in their purchases. Should the changes proposed be enacted it is a taking of a right through inverse 7 8034 Camino Predera - 4015 sq ft,; 8044 Camino Predera — 3088 sq ft; 8045 Camino Predera — 3628 sq ft; 8054 Camino Predera — 3765 sq ft; 8089 Camino Predera — 3778 sq ft — 8062 Camino Predera — 3212 sq ft.; 8072 Camino Predera — 6175 sq ft. (Areas were determined from public records. 9 See 120 Cal. 488 L. A. No. 322 Supreme Court of California Decided April 011898 — Kennedy v. Burnap, 120 Cal, 488, 488-89 (Cal. 1898). 'The simplest rule and that best suited to a country like ours, in which changes are taking place in the ownership and the use of lands, is that no right [to views] can be acquired without express grant of an interest in, or covenant relating to, the lands over which the right is claimed." 9 595 DALey LANE, KALI5PELL, MT 59901 (909) 98 1 -6797 OFFICE (909) 982-3831 FAX LICENse #'505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 388 condemnation that is not consistent amongst all of the properties in the hillside development overlays and any new standards will stand in stark contrast to the recent approvals granted to the applicant at 7563 Alta Cuesta who is also within the same hillside overlay as those who own property on Camino Predera. The application of new development standards For one street and not another that is immediately adjacent is in and of itself a prejudicial act that must be thoroughly explained as the hillside overlay was equally placed on all similar topographies throughout the city for the same reason - to preserve hillsides not views. Setting aside the complaints of a few, what now causes a material change in Camino Predera's topography over those in Haven View Estates or any other that warrants such a drastic depravation to each of its property owners? The answer is nothing! The current standards of the development code have served the needs of the citizenry of Rancho Cucamonga well since being enacted by the Council many years ago. Although the appellants may not agree with the Code, or public policy in California, or the private contract they have entered into by purchase, and have chosen to express their opposition through the use of repeated appeals the regulatory scheme is nonetheless rule of law under which we all must live. Attrition cannot be used as the basis for precedent. I urge you and the decision makers for the City of Rancho Cucamonga not to modify the development code for the benefit of such a small group to the detriment of the entire city. if the city fathers are inclined to support one small group in such a way, where will such discretion end in similar matters and rules begin that are necessary to preserve the equitable balance that must be struck by every governing body? Respectfully Submitted, BARDOS CONSTUCTION, INC. Paul Bardos, President DRC2017-000244 8035 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 CC. Mayor Dennis Michael Director, Ann McIntosh Sr. Planner, Michael Smith Assoc. Planner, Tabe Van der Zwaag Mary Bardos to 595 DALEY LANE, KALISPELL, MT 59901 (909) 9B1-6797 OFFICE (909) 982-31331 FAX LICENSE #505220 MULTIPLE AWARD WINNING LICENSED AND INSURED GENERAL CONTRACTOR Page 392 EXHIBIT 1 TRACT MAP 10035 Page 300 n, .cr e Vi 03 JQ elstA aVll (� . • . SCO • • A ' • fi• c 1S P'1' SrCL v • �a yep • e�n�a ON cm CD s 3 r CO CD'� Unary C U C_ `'e . r 'C'S • �p7 . • • t C�j• r . • gyp, 0 Hil! COtintry O • �d • oo 00. CD ��,�, • C' � � ~moi%. d • O • ` • ieN, rapa�d`OBO Chea « • • reek Trail(jcamQnga Creek Page 304 EXHIBIT Z CC & R's TRACT 10035 Page 308 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 wHEn RECORDED MAIL TO: Rancho Associates, Ltd. P.O. Box 7000-311 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701 Irn 1. a4tii 2--11 kwKr 1.n1 Committee V7 10 1.02 Close of Escrow E RECORDED IM CFF':. _ -r-• . 3 0 TABLE OF CO?iTE'7T5 OF DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESER4ATION OF EASEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY OF RA14CHO CUCAM011GA, COUNT-• O T 7 it, T' E CALIFO-11TA PAGE ir0. ARTICLE I MINITIOLp 1.n1 Committee 1 1.02 Close of Escrow 1 1.03 Declarant 2 1.04 Declaration 2 1.05 Dwelling Unit 2 1.06 Family 2 1.47 Improvement 2 1.08 Lot 2 1.09 Mortgage 2 1.10 Mortgagee 2 1.11 Owner 2 1.12 Person 3 1.13 Projects 3 1.14 Record or Filed 3 1.15 Street 3 ARTICLE II USE RESTRICT1¢LI_S 2.02 Buildings 2.03 Signs - _ 04 Via. S 2.06 Nuisance 2.07 Antennae 5 2.08 Animal and Insect Restriction 5 2.09 vehicles 6 2.10 Business or Commercial Activity 6 -i- Page I of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 300 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 pb( NO. Page 2 of I8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 3041 2.11 Trash 6 2.12 Ila Hazardous Activities 7 2.13 No Mining and Drillings 7 2.14 Further Subdivision 7 2.15 Water and Sewer Systems 7 2.16 Drainage 7 2.17 Solar Energy Installations a ARTICLE III EAPEMEN SANDENCROACHMEIITS 3.01 Utility Easements 8 3.02 Access to Slopes and Drainage Ways 8 3.03 Slops Maintenance B 3.04 Sight Lines 9 ARTICLE IV LAS:_ USC eE. IRRIGATIO11 AtlD RAIllTQlA110E 4.01 Installation of Landscaping 9 4.02 Exterior Maintenance and Repair; Owner's Obligations 10 ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL AND LA11pStAPIN0 COMMITTEE 5.41 Members of Committee 10 5.02 Meetings of the Committee 11 5.03 No Waiver of Future Approvals 11 5.04 Compensation of Members 11 5.05 Correction of Defects 11 5.06 Non -Liability of Committee Members 12 5.07 Variance 12 ARTICLE VI TFRMINATLON AMENDME11T AND SEV RAg__ BILITY 6.01 Termination and Amendment 13 6.02 Severability 13 ARTICLE VII EXEMPTION AND 81 HIS OF DECLARANT 13 ARTICLE VII MISCF.r.LANEOUS 8.01 Enforcement 14 a.. v« .. i.S L:. onu ALtc rlie. L i bes 1+ 8.03 No Representations or Warranties is S.O4 Ccnstrucrivn V; tir_r, -i;!rl Aer. s%nr A!nrr. , r. 8.05 Insurance obligations of Owners 15 6.06 Notices 15 Page 2 of I8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:21 AM Page 3041 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 DECLARATION OF COVEWUNTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMEN?S FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY of RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTYOE SAN BEPNARQINp,,STATE _OF CALI EO IQ � IA THIS DECLARA'T'ION is made by Rancho Associates, Ltd., a California general partnership, hereinafter referred to as "Declarant." E 8 g H 9 a L;= A. Declarant is the Owner of certain real property ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Lots 1 thru 38, inclusive, of Tract tic. 10035, located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 179 of maps, pages 33, 33 and 35, records of Said County. B. Declarant will convey the Project, subject to certain protective covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements as hereinafter set forth. C. Declarant hereby declares that all of the Project shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements, all and each of which are for the purpose of enhancing and perfecting the value, desirability, and attractiveness of the Project, in furtherance of a general plan for the protection of the Project, or any portion thereof. All, and each of, these covenants, conditions, restrictions and easements of this Declaration are hereby imposed as equitable servitudes upon the Project, shall run with the Project, and shall be binding on all parties having or acquiring any rights, title or interest in the Project or any part thereof, and their successors and assigns. ARTICLE I DEFUU TIONS {`-'t��l,'..' •ni _ - ]L-06 - B!'r'hltnr•r. '.p _. y __. ... :. V •- '...Z. t3 yrµ! ...W,L L:, Article V hereof. Section l.oz, "Close of Escrow" shall mean the date on which a deed conveying any Lot is recorded in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder. -i- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 3 of 18 Printed on 8+22?2019 8:43:21 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 300 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station [d :ZYNE 88-291661 Section -},03. "Declarant" shall mean Rancho Associates, Ltd., a California general partnership, its successors, and any Person to which it shall have assigned any rights hereunder by an expressed written assignment. Section 1.04. •'Declaration" shall mean this instrunent as it may be amended from time to time. Section 1.05. "Dwg1lincs Unit" shall mean a detached building located on a Lot and designed and intended for use and occupancy as a residence by a single family. Section 1.06. ",Faintly" shall moan (1) a group of natural Persons related to each other by blood or legally related to each other by marriage or adoption, or (2) a group of not more than six (6) Persons not all so related, inclusive of their domestic servants, who naintain a cornon household in a D-olling Unit. Section 1.67. "ImRrovemen •• shall mean all structures and appurtenances thereto of every type and kind, including but not limited to buildings, outbuildings, walkways, bicycle trails, sprinkler pipes, garages, carports, roads, driveways, parking areas, landscaping items, fences, screening valls, retaining r•alls, stairs, decks, landscaping, hedges, windbreaks, plantings, planted trees and shrubs, poles, signs, exterior air conditioning and water -softener fixtures or equipment. Section 1.08. "Lal" shall mean any residential plot of land shown upon any recorded subdivision map or retarded parcel rap of the Project which is subject to this Declaration. Section 1.02. "Mortgage" shall mean any mortgage or deed of trust or other conveyance of a Lot to secure the performance of an obligation, which will be reconveyed upon the completion of such performance. The term "Deed of Trust" or "Trust Deed" when used herein shall be synonymous with the term "Mortgage." Section 1.10. "Mortcageell shall mean a Person to whom a Mortgage is made and shall include the beneficiary of a peed of Trust; "Mortgagor" shall nean a Person who mortgages his or its property to another (i.e., the maker of a Mortgage), and "hall include the Trustor of a Deed of Trust. The term "Trustor" shall hn svnrnv^ •� _�.. «, y •• r. _ _,. "Beneficiary" shall be synonymous with the term "Mortgagee". ��--;--cr "yen er" an"il mean the Person or i'erstnx simp.Le interest ci reGUrd to any Lot which is a part of the Project, including sellers under executory contracts of sale, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. For purposes of Article 1I only, unless the context otherwise requires, "Owner" shall also include the family, guests, invitees, licensees and lessees of any Owner. -2- i i r t i SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 4 of l8 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 396 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88--291661 Sect1_on 1.3Z. Fernan'� sheik Wean a natural individual, a legal right to hold corporation or any other entity with the title to real property. Lectkon 1._17. "Pro iect" shall mean that certain real property described in Paragraph A of the Preanble to this Declaration. Section_• "Record" or "Filed" shall mean, with respect to any document, the recordation or filing of such dccurent in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California. e5 ctysD-1�-15. "Street, shall mean any street or other thoroughfare, shown on any recorded subdivision map or parcel nap of the Project. The foregoing definitions shall be applicable to this Declaration and also to any Declaration of ,amendment, unless otherwise expressly provided, recorded pursuant to the provisions of this Declaration. ARTICLE II SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 MSE IS All real property within the Project shall be held, used and enjoyed subject to the following limitations and restrictions, subject to the exemptions of Declarant set forth herein: ti 2 single Family Residg_n_s•e. Each Lot shall have a Dwelling Unit constructed thereon which shall be used as a residence for a single Family and for no other purpose. Section_2-0 pUildings. No Dwelling Unit shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain in any Lot other than one detached Dwelling Unit designed to accommodate no more than a single family and its servants and occasional guests, plus a garage and fencing and such other Improvements as are necessary or customarily incident to a single Family Dwelling Unit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an accessory structure (i.e., gazebo, cabana, etc.) may be erected with the Article v of this Declaration. Anything contained in thi3 arc-rinn to the rnntrnry nor ithstandinq, no accessory structure MTv he n1a ced on the Lot until Uvner ootains 61� complies with all governmental idws, ir.1u l.y, 4 to, the setback requirements required by zoning ordinance (a). In addition to the foregoing, the precise design and placement of all structures on all Lots with the Project shall be subject to approval by the Design Service -3- Page 5 of 18 Printed on 8.'22!2019 8:43:22 AM Page 591; Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE Comm � 88-491%1iildi of the City of Rancho Cucamonga prior t° the of building Perr,its. issuance advetn9 device obi !{O sign, poster, billboard, displayed to the Publictviewnan display o any kind shat! be any Lot, •Without the on anY Parti an °f the Project or except one sign for each ot,,,Gljngnunonsennt roil the Cvamittec• square feet, advertising the ping tn't, :•ore thanrOpert except signs, regardless of size, Y far sale or rent, or successors or assigns, for directional ed by Declarant, or to advertiseect du or informationits period. All signseorrbillbvardsng he construction andsalefor the regulation thereof sha all applicable ll conform to the requirements of governmental ordinances, promulgated of be�r:nt'as setEgrt s• Subject to the exemption Improvement, or other Obstructionsshallplion,anted, no vegetation, constructed, or maintained on an a h location such height as to unreasonablyY Cat in such location or of Lot in the project. Each Owneofsaruct the view from a the periodic trimmingLot shalt be responsible other located on and pruning of all hedges shrubsnas dt for from adjacent Lots' so as to not unreasonably obstruct and trees acen� In the event of a d the view to the obstruction of view from a Lot, such dispute shall be dispute between owners as submitted to the Committee, whose decisions °h such natter be binding. Any such obstruction shall, upon request °t the Committee, be removed shalt of the Committee, or otherwise altered to the satisfaction obstruction is by the Owner of the Lot upon wk- Obstruction said located. In the event that any owner shall fail withetheeor requests of se alter any such obstruction authorized a Che Co°unittee, the Committee or itsin dulywritten notice ototthe or agentsowner of ' upon fifteen (15) days y right to correct such condition$ and41 enteron Y prior for the L°t, shall have the for the Purpose of doing s°, and such Owner p such Owner's Lot recoverablehb Cthe tee of the cost thereat, Such shall pcosttly Article IV o y the Committee in the same manner shall be 2.04, an Owner's this Declaration. For purposes g as set forth in sight from sl,,.K n,._1. , shall be de"pri +. f this Sline c3 -t '-filch intersects or line ct time the Lot which is of equal or traverses any time the grading and initial ctrl=t_rg Projnrr. �; , _ 4 greater deed to i • tau OY 1�erla-j - "n at lots �' LY acknowied ' by accepting a 1n the project at the t ges that the line of sight from Offered for sale to the time such Lots were subsequent obstruction d5ublie by Declarant nay originally Plantings by i]eclarant or by result of future ebe subject to specifications a the Owners pursuantrtotion or Section 2.04 Ind Article by the Committee in accordato PlanWitands Article v of this Declaration, the maximum -4- SAN 4- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 6 of 18 Printed on 8:2212019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 381 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291%1 roof height of Lots 1 tc� 21 inclusive shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet above top of tura at the center of th,, lot. ser.Sion 2.95. Temnorary Buildings. Subject to the provisions of Article Vil of this Declaration, no outbuilding, basement, tent, privy, shack, shed or other temporary building or Improvements of any kind shall be placed upon any portion of the Project either tempgra.ily or permanently. Ito garage, trailer, camper, motor home, boat or recreation vehicle shall Le used as a residence in the Project, either temporarily or permanently. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an accessary structure (i.e., gazebo, cabana, etc.) may be erected with the express written consent of the Committee formed pursuant to Article V of the Declaration. Anything contained In this section to the contrary notwithstanding, no accessory structure may be placed on the Lot until Owner obtains all permit% and complies with all governmental laws, including, but not limited to, the setback requirements required by zoning ordinance(s). Section _2_._06. Ng_igance. No Lot shall be used in such manner as to obstruct or interfere unreasonably with the residential uses of other Lots, nor in such manner as to unreasonably annoy the occupants of Dwelling Units located on other Lots by unreasonable noises, offensive odors, noxious or offensive trade or activity, or otherwise. .Section 2.07. Antennae. 110 exterior radio antenna, c.13. antenna, television antenna, satellite dish, pole or other antenna of any type shall be erected or maintained on any Lot. A master antenna or cablevision antenna may be provided for the use of all owners, and Declarant may grant easements for such purposes. Section 2.08. Animal and _InsectRes�ri-miction, 110 livestock, reptiles, insects, poultry or other animals of any kind shall be raised, bred or kept on any Lot, except domestic dogs, cats, fish, birds and other household pets may be kept an Lots, provided that they are not kept, bred or maintained for commercial purposes or in unreasonable quantities. As used in this Declaration, "unreasonable quantities" shall ordinarily mean more than three (3) pets per Dwelling Unit, provided, number in any instance may be more or less. The committee shall have the right to prohibit maintenance of any a nintil khirh In SLS opinion cunuritutea a nulsanl:e to any other owner. Animni; S.V i6Lc�l7� Lu Vil,vt5, Q4.;C 1rsu1Lfi OL tpulr ilc6n_iee5, tenantci or invitees within the Project must be either kept within an enclosure, or enclosed patio or on a leash being held by a Ferson capable of controlling the animal. Furthermore, any owner shall be absolutely liable to each and all remaining Owners, their families, guests, tenants and invitees, for any animals brought or kept upon the Project by an owner or by members of his family, his tenants or his guests. -5- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 7 of 18 Printed on 8/2212019 8:43:22 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 382 Branch :R03, User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-29if l sent ion_2-09. Vehicles. No trailer, trailer coach, carp trailer, -otor hone, recreational vehicle, trucP., carper, or boat shall be kept or maintained anywhere on the Project, including without linitation, any Street (public or private), in such manner as to be visible fron a neighboring Lot, unless the screened in a designated sideyard behind fencing approvedy Architectural Ccamittec. no vehicle or boat shall be constructed or repaired upon any Lot or Stroat (public or private) in such a manner as to be visible from any Lot. NO inoperable vehicle shall be stored or allowed to remain on any Lot or Street (public or private} in such a manner as to to visible from any other Lot. Vehicles owned, operated or within the control of any Owner shall be parked in the garage of such owner, to the extent of the space available therein, and each owner shall ensure that his garage is maintained so as to be capable of accommodating at least two (2) full-sized automobiles. notwithstanding the foregoing, these restrictions shall not be interpreted in such canner so as to pewit any activity which would be contrary to any ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. iaa_t n_2 M- pu-sineIs or, Connercia Ac JvaCX• 110 part of the project shall ever be used or caused to be used or allowed or authorized in any way, directly or indirectly, for any business, commercial, manufacturing, mercantile, storing, vending or other such non-residential purposes; except Declarant, its successors or assigns, may use any portion of the Project owned by Declarant for model hone sites, display and sales office during the construction and sales period in accordance with this Declaration, and except professional and administrative occupations without external evidence thereof, for so long as such occupations are in conformance with local governmental ordinances and are merely incidental to the use of the Dwelling Unit as a single Family residential home. Sach owner may rent or lease the Dwelling Unit on his Lot by means of a written lease or rental agreement subject to the restrictions of this Declaration. The terms of any such lease or rental agreement shall be subject in all respects to the provisions of this Declaration, and any failure by the lessee of such D:elling Unit to comply with the terms of this Declaration shall constitute a default under the lease or rental agreement. Section 2,11. Trasth. No rubbish, trash or garbage or other waste material shall be kept or permitted upon any Lot, except concealed from view, and no odor shall be permitted to arise therefrnn so 14 to rr.nder the Project, or any portion thereof, unsanitary. unsiahtiy. olrensive or detrinentai to any uu14r property in the viulnity tnernLL o- to its c'"ul..,r.t.,. : m„-,. containers shall be exposed to the view of neighboring Lots only when set out for a reasonable period of time (not to exceed twelve (12) hours before and after scheduled trash collection hours). There shall be no exterior fires whatsoever except barbecue fires contained within receptacles therefor and fire SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 -6- Page 8 of 18 Printed on 812212019 8:43:22 AM Page 380 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id -ZYNE 88-2916G1 pits in the enclosed yards designed in such a manner that they do not create a fire hazard. tto clothing or household ec:ta t shall be hung, dried oairedinnthecPrajech a t,landhnoPlunber,ag tc be visible to other property. grass, shrub, or tree clippings or plant waste, petals, bulk materials, scrap, refuse or trash shall be kept stored or allowed to accur..ulate on any portiorscreenedct cfrtr. within an enclosed structure or appropriately v iew . t us v t' No activities ,hall cartioa 1U 2.• - Lot, and ne Improvements shall be be cod on any hick are or might be unsafe or hazardcus constructed on any to any Person or property. r. c ..l na and nri_S11D9• No portion of the a 2 uarrjir. ,• purpose of pining. �} j, Project shall be used for the Pt r or removing vator, oil, gas. drilling, baring, or exploring tr savel or earth. ns, minPralsort�dkfromanylot in the project or other hydrocarbo tic gravel or earth shall b_ exp ect has a need for gravel or so Song as any other Lot in the Proj earth. cor-r ,fin 2.14. Eu—=S d v'ai Na owner shall further subdivide or partition his Lot: provided, however, that this provision shall not be construed to limit the right of an pease (1) to rent or lease all of his Lot by means of a written lease or rental agreement subject Lott nothe tleasednforftransthisient or Declaration, so loto sell his Lot: or (]? ng transfer or sell t+ss hotel purposes: (2} Lot to more than One Person to be held by them as tenants ni common, joint tenants, tenants by tris entirety or me community property. Teres of any such rental or lease agreement shall be ons of this subject in all respects slto the ee ofrsuch1Lot to complye�ithathetion and any failure by the forms of this Declaration shall constitute a default under the lease. V r a d 5 w ms. He individual water ect'an 2.L�• water softener system or sewage disposal system supply system, shall be permitted on any Lot unless such system is designed, located, eansc�un�a�7dsand andgrecth the ommendationsed in dofcany iapplicable •=�n�rnt yna1ti- tiuthority water district and any having jurisdiction. There snas i u� :,c with or obstruction tnetpFo�eCti�lsnfju unlessanadequate alternative over any proper drainage and is first approved in provision is aade for propished writing by the Committee. Any alteration of the a to applicable bl drainage pattern must at all times comply local governmental ordinancesFor the purpose hereof, exists "established" drainage is defined as the drainage which SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR I988.291661 -7- Page 9of18 Printed on 8x22/2019 8:43:23 AM Page 384 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988,291661 89-291661 at the tine the overall grading of any Lot is co;-pleted by Declarant, or that which is shown on any plans approved by the. committee. Each Owner shall naintain, repair and replace and keep free from debris or obstructions the drainage systen and devices, if any, located on his Lot. SectiQn 2.17. 6olar Energy 1nspalla-i2ns, The Cc-nr,.ittee shall approve the plans and specifications for the installation of residential (including swi-iming pools) solar systorx, provided that the Committee determines that such plans and specifications demonstrate the exercise of reasonable r,.eesures to mininize the potential adverse aesthetic impact of the installation on other portions of the Project. The Committee shall promulgate reasonable standards and guidelines against which to examine any such plans and specifications, in accordance with Article V of the Declaration. NO Cwithstandirg the foregoing, any such Committee approval shall have no effect upon the enforceability of any other use restriction in the Declaration. ARTICLE III t Itation_7.01,. t it aserents. Each Owner agrees, by the acceptance of his deed, that his Lot is granted subject to easements for utility installations and maintenance. Easements for installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities are reserved as shown on any recorded Subdivision flap of the Project. Within these easements, no structure, planting or other material shall be placed or permitted to remain which may damaqe or interfere with the installation and maintenance of utilities and drainage facilities. The utility easement areas of each Lot and all Improvements in it shall be maintained continuously by the Owner of such Lot, except for those Improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. ,tigEIL n 7.02, Access t S a d ........ W Earh Owner agrees for himself and his successors in interest, by the acceptance of his deed, to permit free access by owners of other Lots to slopes or drainage ways, if any, located on his Lot, which slopes or drair"o fr,- - , r,, -«, a_cess is essential tar the maintenance of permanent stabilization on such slopes or for the maintenance of r.74d -i-fit:':•; ..-;; --. _Ii.: ,, �c_C.esl a8. -.:r ta.Lu Otnur Luta. Section 3_47. SIPPQ MAil3trnanQe. The slope areas, if any, Of each Lot and all Improvements in them shall be maintained continuously by the owner of the Lot, except for those Improvements for which a public authority or utility company is responsible. .a- Page 10 of 18 Printed on 8.-2212019 8:43:23 AM Page 388 Branch :R03, User :3500 Comment: Station Id 2YNE HS-29.lss1 Section I -DA. $.LgLt_1anc%• Ila fence, wall, hedge, or sh*L!: planting which obstructs sight lines at elevations between Vag and six feet above the Street shall be placed or permitted to remain on any corner Lot within the triangular area forced by the Street property lines and a line connecting then at points twenty-five (25) feet from the intersection of the Street linea. or in the case of a rounded property corner from the intersection of the Street property lines extended as it the Streets intersected. The same sight -line limitations shall apply to any Lot within ten (10) feet from the intersection of a Street property line with the edge of driveway or alley pavement. Ila trees shall be permitted to remain within such distance of such intersections unless the foliage line is maintained at sufficient height to prevent obstruction of the sight lines. ARTICLE IV LAIJDSCAPE011 A 7D MbINTEIIAHCE Section 4.01. Installation of Landscapincl. Within ninety (90) days after the close of escrow for the sale of a Lot with d o-4eliing Unit thereon in the Project from Declarant to a purchaser, the owner shall plant lawns or otherwise landscape the front yard and side yard in a neat and attractive canditicn, in accordance with a landscape plan approved in writing by the Committee pursuant to Article V of this Declaration. Within twelve (12) months after close of escrow for the sale of a Lot with a Duelling unit thereon in the Project from Declarant to a Purchaser, the owner shall plant lawns or otherwise landscape his rear yard, and thereafter maintain the landscaping of his rear yard in a neat and attractive condition, in accordance with a landscape plan approved in writing by the Committee pursuant to Article V of this Declaration. In the event such landscaping is not completed within the tine -frame above mentioned, Declarant or the committee may enter on to such Lot and carry out landscaping plans approved by the Committee at the expense of the owner of such Lot. Said plan shall provide for landscaping sufficient to prevent drainage or flow of water from said Owner's Lot onto any adjacent Lot. All vegetation on the Lots shall be irrigated and fertilized regularly. Each owner cf a Lot shall cut, prune, irrigate and maintain regularly the In the eventofoffailure of an owner to comply with any of the fnregninq rngcitrrmrnrf (which r3ilirre shell he rrgardod '+n nuisance!. the Committee or its dulv autnor7zea appointees or agents snail Iso notity the o•..ner ana oireLr. :;uL.7I vuiieL Lu :c whatever work is necessary to secure compliance with this Section. If within thirty (30) days after such owner's receipt of said written notice, the Owner's Lot still does not conform to the requirements of this Section, the Committee or its duly authorized appointees or agents shall have the right either to seek any remedies at law or in equity which it may have or to enter upon the offending Lot and remove weeds, rubbish or other materials and do all things necessary to place such Lot in -9- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page I I of 18 Printed on 8121-2019 8;43:23 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 380 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station 1d :ZYNE SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 `iN-291661 compliance with this Section, including the installation, irrigation and fertilisation of vegetation and other landscaping. The Cormittee shall have the right to order such work to be accaaplished by any third party at any tire attar sending notice to such Ouner. The Committee shall have the right to commence an action at law against any such Owner to recover the cost of such work. Interest shall accrue on such delincp_tent amounts at the rate of ten percent (144) per annur fron and after expiration of such thirty (3a) day pericJ, and any judgment in favor of the Committee shall include all cost of suit and reasonable attorneys' fees. Segtion 4.02. g=ri A errs 2b1_igation-2. No Improvenents anywhere within the Project shall be permitted to fall into disrepair, and each Improvement shalt at all tires be Fept in goad condition and repair. Ih tl;c 0Y:4.; - that any owner shall permit any Improvement, which is the responsibility of such Owner to maintain, to fall into disrepair so as to create a dangerous, unsafe, unsightly or unattractive condition, the Committee upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of such property, shall have the right to correct such condition, and to enter upon such Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so, and such Owner shall prorptly reimburse the Committee for the cost thereof. Such cost steal', be recoverable by the Committee in the same manner as set forth in Section 4.01 of this Article. The Owner of the offending Lut shall be personally liable, and his Lot may be subject to a mechanic's lien, for all costs and expenses incurred by the Committee in taking such corrective acts, plus all costs incurred in collecting the amounts due. Each Owner shall pay all amounts due for such work with ten (10) days after receipt of written demand therefor. ARTICLE V ARCHTTEOUPAL Atip LAr405CAPJ1icCO T $eotion 5.01, 0138-2 of Committee. The Architectural and Landscape Committee, sometimes referred to in this Declaration as the "Committee", shall consist of representatives of Declarant whose business address is P.O. Box 7000-311, Ranchc Cucamonga, California 91701. Declarant shall have the unrestricted right to appoint and remove a majority of the raftnbpr5 of rhe r..--4-- ndlority at the members of the Committee and to.fill any vararL: of such majority until the "turnover date" which vhall the thr =�-c- -.. hL.�f C:::.�: ._, 1114..,, J.LicctHt tvV b) of Zito 1.VLs recorded ("Close of Escrow"), or (2) five years following the date of issuance of the Penal Subdivision Public Report for the Project, whichever occurs earlier. Declarant nay at any time assign in writing such powers of removal and appointment t,� any developer of Lots in the Project, subject to such terms and conditions as Declarant may impose. Commencing one (1) year fron the date of Close of Escrow for the sale of the first Lot in tht- -10- Page 12 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:23 AM Page 3841 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE K8-291661 Project to a purchaser (other than a developer) frc- Ceclarant. the Owners of a na]ority of the Lots (excluding Lot awrcd ty Declarant) shall have the power to appoint in writing one (i;. nember to the Carmittee, until the turnover date. Thereafter. the Owners of a majority of the Lots (including Lets owned Ly Declarant) shall have the power to appoint and rer..ove all of t"n members of the Cove ttee. Members of the Committee appointed t� the Ccrmittee by Cecla:ant nvud nit be resi-'ents of the Prcje-:- but all other members of the Committee must be full ti. -.c residents of the Project. Section 5.6Z. Meetings of the Cor�imitt.Oe. The Co:anittee shall neat from time to time as necessary to perfur^ its duties hereunder. The Carmittee may from time to time, by resolution tsnanir..ously adopted in writing, designate a Cornittee Representative (who may, but need not, be one of its renbers) t_ take any action or perform any duties for and an behalf of the Committee, except the granting of variances pursuant to Section 5.08 hereof. In the absence of such designation, the vote or the written consent of a majority of the Coms.,ittee taken without a meeting shall constitute an act of the Committee. nrtion 5.03. ;:p waiver of Future Approvliln. The approval of the Committee to any proposals or plans and specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed or in connection with any other natter requiring the approval and consent of the Connittee shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent as to any similar proposals, plans and specifications, drawings or matter whatever subsequently or additionally submitted for approval or consent. Section 5.O9. CornpenEation of Members. The nembers of the Committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses actually incurred by then in the performance of their duties hereunder. sgction 5.05. Correction of Defgcts. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: (a) The Committee or its duly authorized representative may at any time inspect arty Improvement for which aooroval of nlans ja !.,a r «ti:.. n.«: � . �.. : , . however, that the Committee's right of inspection of Improvements for which plans have been submitted and rproved •� _ .. .� .. _.__1 . ., _ 1f .; a1LGL a..us .+�i r: ... a. N:v.�:.int given written notice to the Committee of- such ycompletion. The committee's rights of inspection shall not terminate pursuant to this paragraph in the event that plans for the work. of Improvement have not previously been submitted to and approved by the Committee. If, as a result of such inspection, the Committee finds that such Improvement was done without obtaining approval of the plans therefor or was not done in substantial compliance with the plans approved by the Conmittee, it shall -11- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 13 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:23 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 380 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-M661 notify the owner in writindays saizometto inspe}tiith speccfyinc Article V within sixty L 1 Y the partictloareguiranthe-oy'nercto take suchlactconhaslna; Otte authority necessary to remedy the noncorpliancc, (b) If upon the expiration of sixty (60) days from the dat4a such noncompliance, the cormittee shall "3743failed remedy determine trie estimated Cost of correetirq or removing the sane, and the Committee, at its option, may record a notice of office Recorder of San noncompliance in the eacefullyfrenedy the the ynocompliance, and the Bernardino and may p for all owner shall :eiaburse the Cor�ittec, upon demand, expenses incurred in connection therewith. if such Gxpethen theJ ;•� not promptly repaid by the Owner to the r inittee, Comnittee shall have all rights at law or in equity to colleEt such expenses, in accordance with the provisions of Section :•o' - of this Declaration. (c) If for any reason the Committee fails to notify the owner of any norcorsplianncewith a previously sr receipt ubmitted ed and approved plans within :sixty ( ) d ays written notice of completion from the owner, the ropedvplans. shall be deetLed to be in accordance with said app t elbers, [[either ME �9Sz•nor authorized representativethe Committee nshallybeeliablehtoeany owner any} loss, damage or injury arising cut of or in any Way connecUndCSS with the performance of the Committee's duties hereunder, du© to the willful misconduct or bad faith of the Committee The Jew a prove all committee shall revpro approve sedImprovemcnt, alterationnor submitted to it for any proposed addition, on the basis of satisfaction Of the Committee with the grading plan, location of the Improvements on the Lot, the lor scheme finished ground elevation the cotyle and design, proportions, architecture, shape, height, Y appropriateness of proposed Improvements to views from or typ000ftng Lots, the materials used ritherein Cc haren' the planting landscaping, size, height or location of vegetation Ln a +•�=. nr 30sthetic considerations and the overall benefit or wn ten would ro*"c -.. :1,4 ,:7,L' ': i_... �;.' _ �r�5;�iaratiun the generail}. ,..v .:4_ , aesthetic aspects of the architectural exterior tinishes-and buildings, landscaping, color schemes, materials and similar features, but shall not be responsible frr reviewing, not shall its approval of an plansfrom or dcsi n beof deemed approval of, any plan or design oint structural safety or conformance with building or other codes. gPgtign 5.07. va a The Cor..mittee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the architectural SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 14 of 18 Printed on 8122120 1 9 8:43:23 AM Page 306 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 provisions of this Declaration, including without limitation restrictions upon height, size, flour area or placement of structures, or similar restrictions when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aestt;etic or environmental consideration may require. Such variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at leant a majority of the Committee and shall become effective upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino. If such variances are granted, no violation of the covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall be deerred to have occurred with respect to the natter for which the variance was granted. The granting of such a variance shall not operate to waive any of the terns and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to the particular property and particular provision hereof covered by the variance, nut shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting the use of his Lot, including but not limited to zoning ordinances and Lot setback lines or requirements imposed by any governmental authority. ARTICLE VI TERMIIfATI011. AHENt7MEt4T At7D sEVERABILI Section 6.01. Termination d amendment. All the covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall run with the Project and shall be binding on, and enforceable by, all Owners for a period of time extending until December 31, 2023, and thereafter said covenants, conditions and restrictions shall automatically be extended for successive periods of ten (10) years, unless, by a written instrument signed by the owners of seventy-five percent (75t) of the hots at any time and recorded in the Office of the San Bernardino County Recorder, the owners determine to revoke or change in whole or in part this Declarr.tion, sub)ect to the provisions of Article VII of this Deelaratimn. Section 6.02. Severability. Invalidation of any one of the easenents, covenants, conditions or restrictions of this Declaration by judgment or court order shall not affect any other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. ARTICLE VII rvrnq.+•+n.� ...., r+rif-I nr nr. r.,. vothing in this Declaration shall limit the right of Declarant to complete construction of Improvements on the Project or to alter the foregoing, or to construct such additional Improvements as Doclarant deems advisable prior to the completion and the sale by Declarant, of all of the Lots in the Project. Such rights shall include, but shall not be limited to, erecting, constructing, and maintaining on any portion of the Project owned by Declarant such structures and 2v)r. SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 15 of 18 Printed on 8.22?2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 3011 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291661 displays as nay be reasonably necessary for the conduct of its business of completing the work and disposing of the sane by sale, lease, or otherwise. Declarant specifically reserves the right to use any unsold Lots on the Project for models and sales offices, and further reserves the right to rent any unsold Lots. This Declaration shall not limit the right of Declarant at any time prior to acquisition of title to a Lot by a purchaser from Declarant to establish on the Lot additional easements, reservations and rights-of-way for itself, utility companies, or other as nay from time to tine be reasonably necessary for the property development and disposal of the Project. Declarant reserves the right to alter its construction plans and designs as it deems appropriate. Declarant further reserves the right to alter floor plans, styles, quality, size and cost of Dwelling Units owned by Declarant in the Project without first seeking the approval of the Committee. Declarant may further subdivide any Lot owned by Declarant. The rights of Declarant hereunder may be assigned by Declarant to any successor to all or part of Declarant's interest in the Project. The provisions of this Article shall not be altered or terminated without the prior written consent of Declarant fo so long as any Lots in the Project remain unsold. ARTICLE VIII j.1&73144RRJ X -11V S-ection_a.ol. Enforcement. Breach of any of the easements, coveannts, conditions, or restrictions contained in this Declaration and the continuation of any such breach may be enjoined, abated, or remedied by appropriate legal or equitable proceedings by an Owner, by the Committee (or member thereof), by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or by Declarant' provided, however, that any matter duly approved by the Committee as provided herein shall be deemed not to be in violation of any provision of this Declaration. It is hereby agreed that recovery of damages at law for any breach of the provisions of this Declaration would not be an adequate remedy. Breach of ,any easements, covenants, conditions, or restrictions contained in this Declaration shall not defeat or render invalid the lien of any recorded Mortgage, or any part thereof, made in good faith and for value as to anv hot of the Prniect• but such ngan.,,rC� covenants, conuitions, and restrictions sndil me binding ano effective against any Owner of a Lot or Lots whose title they< -t43 sec it gn 8,02. Costs and Attorneys few. If an action is instituted in a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce any of the covenants, conditions, restrictions, or easements contained in this Declaration, the party against whom the judgment decree, order, or declaration is entered shall, and agrees to, pay all costs of suit and a reasonable attorney's fee, such as may be established by said court. 14 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 16 of 18 Printed on 8!22!2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 809 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station 1d :ZYNE 88-291661 Se t n res tatio s o W n < 5. No representations or warranties of any kind, express qr implied, have been given or made by Declarant, or its agents or ernplol'ee in connection with the Project or any portion of theProject dealing with its physical condition, zoning,compliance applicable laws, purpose for intended use, nor in connection with the subdivision, sales operation, or use of the Project except as specifically and expressly set forth in this Declaration and except as may be filed by Declarant from time to time with the California Department of Real Estate or with any other governmental authority. Every Se 04. conal tive Notice and Acceptance• person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the rrojcct does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, cordition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such persen acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof. t' o ?tlri4ob i a o w Each pwrer shale bbee ssolely responsible for insuring all of his Dwelling Units, including without limitation the structural portions such Dwelling Units, against loss or damage by fire or other casualty. Each owner shall also be solely responsible for obtaining adequate comprehensive public liability insurance, including medical payments and malicious mischief, insuring against liability for bodily injury, death and property damage arising from his activities on his Lot. Sect an 8.06.to Any notice permitted or required to be delivered as provided herein shall be in writing and may he delivered either personally or by mail. If delivery is made by mail, it shall be deemed to have been delivered forty-eight (48) hours after a costa oprepathe same has been id, aid, addressed toanypersonat the deposited States mail, p 9 P P address given by such person to the Committee for the purpose of service of such notice, or to the residence of such person if no address has been given to the Committee, Such addressmay� maybenn cnangea ltum ia.e to :a S..•'. _ _. Y ci3r�, has rs:ec%)ted this Declnrntion 7s of this cp._day RANCHO ASSOCIATES, C�} forpia General Ltd., a }'artnership J/r By. .2 -15- SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 17 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 3®3 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE 88-291*1 S :`A•I W r. F �,`:,.. I I't F r: I :, ,.. C4+U::TY v r SAU B En NARDI!iii 1 t`:is Z°t',day Cf August , 1988, be:orn me the jr.dersiv_ncd a ,.otar;l.ublic in aFei for Bald State, I.ersarall} appeared 1'e%neth F. :eBay, Attornep-i„-1'a-t of Ran. -ho Assec:ates, Ltd„ a California general partnership, 'known I_ to Me to be the ersor. 0:0 exCcutcd the within Instrument on 4chalf of the ParLnCrshiv therein na:nn•l, in,' he a< kr.cul� ,r, ,] to ra. t:.aL :;J`h i�ar �iErs:.:i t>Ye_oteci the sant:, ant] aise known to Ire the prer5on s,•hose name is sibscribed to the within Instrument as Attorney-in-Fa_•t o: RanL!16 AS5o 7jZ:wLS Ltd., and acknowledged to me that he subscribed the name of Rancho Associates, Ltd., thtireto as a Partnership and his own name as Attorney-in-Fa,tt. tt1.NtLS ny }land anv” ffi ial e11. Sigrat;ry . , auclu " NCO ANN MON14RA W W CCI�� I • r, (r•.,rw E,rm Os L IM SAN BERNARDINO,CA Page 18 of 18 Printed on 8/22/2019 8:43:24 AM Document: DR 1988.291661 Page 893 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE RECORDING REQUESTED BY: First American Title Company WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: First 323 Court Scree San Bernardino CA 92401 Attn, Sheila Glass, 94540 5 Recorded in official Records, County of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000084209 08:00am 03/14/0@ First brican title B 1661 I I M I F1 1 5 i 7 M t M ! 0 ri in I A" I INS N Cr'f loil Cr7 488 ■EI rEM M1 I rcm 5 6 DoE Sr tr SCITiO Hari TAX OA tNAO EXAM ri r.�yy .•z 3 GEffRFI- THIS CERTIFICATE OF UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF ARCHITECTURAL AND 6 LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Certificate") is hereby made as of this y of March, 2000, with reference to the following. A. The undersigned constitute all of the members of the Architectural and Landscape Committee (the "Committee") established pursuant to Section 5.01 of that certain Declaration of Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for Tract No. 10035, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded on August 31, 1988, as Instrument No. 88-291661, in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the "Declaration"), as appointed by the owner of the majority of lots within the property covered by the Declaration. B. Pursuant to Section 5V of the Declaration, the Committee has approved, by unanimous consent, a variance from those certain building height restrictions established in Section 2.04 of the of the Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Comr-Attee, by its execution below, hereby certifies as follows 1. The reference in Section 2.04 of the Declaration with respect to the maKlmum roof height of structures on Lots 1 to 21, inuusive, is hereby deleted. The owner of such Lots 1 to 21, inclusive, shat; not be subject to any roof, structure, or building freight limitation, provided that any structure to be constructed all any such Lot(s) complies with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The foregoing variance to the restrictions set forth In the Declaration has been unanimously approved by the members of the Committee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Committee have executed this Cerdficate as of the date first above written. -rIi15Irrsrp,IfM!1TFltr'IFW2n 'h'��R'ir{•r,TR��tA! Pri 3169=179180 4 )4' ly rT. E' A.,vnE0FAF1.Lj Lt'Ji{ tf+ SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 -f - Page 1 of Printed on 812212019 8:43:24 AM Page 3@4 Branch :R03,User :3540 Comment: 3169"27478v1 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 MacMalo Associates, L.P., a Washington limited partnership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporation, its general partner partnertner By; G.F. Ledwith, Vice President MacMaio Associates, L.P., a Washington limited partnership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporation, its generqRAPJt By: ccPresint MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington limited purtoership By: Polygon Lands, Inc., a Washington corporaticn, its general partner By: L.W. Born, Secretary Treasurer Page 2 of 4 Station Id :ZYNE Printed on 8.22;'2019 8:43:24 AM Page 394 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: WASHIN17" STATE OF eAI:IF6Ri4!A ) COUNTY OF —5 waw ) Station Id :ZYNE On March 6 , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public In and for said County and State, personally appeared Geoff F. LeMth personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s.Lwhose name(4 islaw subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shekhey executed the some in hWherkheir authorized capacityoes}, and that by hisGhecltlaeir signature*on the Instrument the person(s)T or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sj-acted, executed the wilhln instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. �Ppa.�SSIpH I otary P lic- Kathrvn L. Sutton : u IJOTgRY+:'Notary Public in and for �; Residing in SkagitCounty the State of Washington S0 Carmission 6pires: 5-9-2002 My �� 02 tWP-TNG-IC N �' kq'o}81yti� STATE OF GAI='FGRllIAr 1 Ss. COUNTY OF SftAGiT ) On , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared pirh;%-A )% pitt- , personalty known to me (or proved lr) me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(e}whose names} islace subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he4heMey executed the same in his;heMheir authorized capacityfie*, and that by his"rAhelK signatureW on the instrument the person(, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(c}acted, executed the within Instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. t�4 �0-) - Notary FKjblic - Kathryn L. Sutton Notary Public in and for the State of Washimton Residing in Skagit County H,v Crnrsissicn Expires: 5-9-2002 3169%27978vI SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 3 of 4 Nort�,:: `-A '9y ''. .......... .•_ -Isl..ot:i Printed on 8/22.'2019 8:43:25 AM Page 3013 Branch :R03,User :3500 Comment: STATE OF ) ss. COUNTY OF sxAG=) Station id :ZYNE On March 6 , 2000, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Lloyd W. Born personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person* whose name(e) IsAm subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that h94he h%L executed the same in hisMerAheir authorized capacity(iea); and that by hisi%eNlheiw signature(" on the instrument the personal, or the entity upon behalf of whi:.h the person acted, executed the within instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. N6tary Pu6lIc - Kathryn 1--ducrm Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Peasiding in Skagit County My Camiission Expires: 5-9-2002 3168518279790 SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 4 of 4 Printed on 8.12212019 8:43:25 AM Page 809 EXHIBIT 3 CC & R MODIFICATION March 14, 2000 Page 308 Branch :R03,User:3500 Comment: Station Id :ZYNE RECORDING REQUESTED BY: First American Title Company WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Hirst American Tltln Co. 323 Court Scree San Bernardino, CA 92401 Attn. Sheila Glass, 94540 5 Recorded in Official Records, Comty of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000@84209 08:00am 03/14/00 First brican title B 1611 Ir— 2 3 5 i 7M11 -191711M K iA I of I Sial hl C" GIT t" Aon Xe "a Ps I no 5A 6 MON ST L11 fYT GitO TI H TAX OA G1I4 r11A1/ THIS CERTIFICATE OF UNANIMOUS CONSENT OF ARCHITECTURAL AND s 6 LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE ("Certillcute") hereby made as of .his y of March, 2000, with reference to the following. A. The undersigned constitute all of the members of the Architectural and Landscape Committee (the "Co(qmittee') established pursuant to Section 5.01 of that certain Declaration of Covenants. Conditions g1nd Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for Tract No. 10035, City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, recorded on August 31, 1988, as Instrument No. 88-291661, in the Official Records of San Bernardino County, California (the "Declaration"), as appointed by the owner of the majority of lots within the property covered by the Declaration. B. Pursuant to Section 5.07 of the Declaration, the Committee has approved, by unanimous consent, a variance from those certain building height restrictions established in Section 2.04 of the of the Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee, by its execution below, hereby certifies as fc[lows 1. The reference in Section 2.04 of the Declaration with respect to the maximum roof height of structures on Lots 1 to 21, inclusive, is hereby deleted. The owner of such Lots i to 21, Inclusive, shall not be subject to any roof, structure, or building height limitation, provided that any structure to be constructed on any such Lot(s) complies with the requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2. The foregoing variance to the restrictions set forth in the Declaration has been unanimously approved by the members of the Committee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the members of the Committee have executed this Cenif tate as of the date first above written. R1if11"rrritr'1rn��C 1n�xR/�i'rrnlAf.Alrtil f 1 71fi51r1Sr,, . . �, 3168SM7978v1 n 't w l;p BE a. E µ:rSHIE-J hl.c1 L NO TIr6L SAN BERNARDINO,CA Document: DR 2000.84209 Page 1 of Printed on 8!22x2014 8:43:24 AM Page 306 EXHIBIT~ 4 CONCORDIA HOMES GRANT DEED Page 3911 RECORDING REQUESTED BY First American Title AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Concordia Homes of Southern California 1131 West Sixth Street, Suite 110 Ontario, CA 91762 Recorded In offlclal Records, County of San Bernardino, Larry Walker, Recorder Doc No. 20000110994 03:00pm 03/31/00 First bricin Title 9 1 Sol 17 21-13F,11751-1 s 7,11-111 . '!1111 1 /a iii: API aims to C" CRT CPT App NMI PFA Mt PC011 Sl 6 Huls Sr Le SVT CA -Co TSAIS TAX CA 61916 Y A.P.N.: 0207.631-01 thru 11;0207-641.01 thru 10 Order No.: 296391 Escrow No.: 945405 GRANT DEED THE UNDERSIGNED GRANTOR(s) DECLARE(s) THAT DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER I AX 1S- COUNTY J615"I, jb J I computed on full value of property conveyed, or computed on full value less value of liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale, unincorporated area; I X ] City of Rancho C lcamonea , and FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, Receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership hereby GRANT(S) to Concordia Homes of Southern California, a California Corporation the following described property in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino State of California; Lots 1 to 21 Inclusive, Tract No. 10035, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 179 of Maps, Page(s) 33 through 35 Inclusive, Records or said County. MacMain Associates, L.P., a Washington Limited Partnership By1� /J � George Ledwith Document Date: December 17, 1999 STATE OF W RS j4 r N G'r&A) )SS COUNTY OF KI !V G- ) p p On Z before m:,_ _}�. �VArJrUE lu1Lt_1PS�fQ un7A?.N penunally appeared __ (yeaR,GE F LLDIJITA personally known tonic (or proved t0 me oa the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(%) whose name(s) islarr subscribed to the within lastrument and acknowledged to me that he/sbrJthey executed the same in his/lterftheir authorized capaclty(ws) and that by his/her'their signature(s) on the Instrument the peruu:is) ur the entity upon hehulf of which the person(%) acted executed the instrument WITNESS my hand aral official seal. • - R. YVONNE PHILLIPS srgnatort STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Pub it for the State of Washington Residing in Seattle, Washington NOTARY----- PUBLIC My Appointment Expires: 06-01-2003 MY COYYISSI4N EXPIRES 6-01-03. Mail Tax Statements to: SAME AS ABOVE or Address Noted Below Page 858 EXHIBIT 5 CC & R REPRINTING Page US PORTIONS OF AND REPRINTED FOR CLARITY: DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATION OF EASEMENTS FOR TRACT NO. 10035 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO STATE OF CALIFORNIA Section 2.04 View Obstructions. Subject to the exemption of Declarant as set forth in this Declaration, no vegetation, Improvement, or other obstructions shall be planted, constructed, or maintained on any lot in such location or of such height as to unreasonably obstruct the view from any other Lot in the Project. Each Owner of a Lot shall be responsible for the periodic trimming and pruning of all hedges shrubs and trees located on his Lot, so as to not unreasonably obstruct the view from adjacent Lots. In the event of a dispute between Owners as submitted to the Committee, whose decisions on such matter shall be binding. Any such obstruction shall, upon request of the Committee, be removed or otherwise altered to the satisfaction of the Committee, by the Owner of the Lot upon which said obstruction is located. In the event that any Owner shall fail to remove or otherwise alter any such obstruction in accordance with the requests of the Committee, the Committee or its duly authorized appointees or agents, upon fifteen (15) days prior written notice to the Owner of the affected Lot, shall have the right to correct such condition, and enter upon such Owner's Lot for the purpose of doing so, and such Owner shall promptly reimburse the Committee of the cost thereof. Such cost shall be recoverable by the Committee in the same manner as set forth in Article IV of this declaration. For purposes of this Section 2.04, an Owner's "view" shall be deemed to exclude any line of sight from such Owner's Lot which intersects or traverses any neighboring Lot which is of equal or greater elevation at the time the grading and initial construction of improvements of the Project is completed by Declarant. Each Owner, by accepting a deed to the Lot, hereby acknowledges that the line of sight from Lots in the Project at the time such Lots were originally offered for sale to the public by Declarant may be subject to subsequent obstruction as a result of future construction or plantings by Declarant or by other Owners pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Committee in accordance with this Section 2.04 and Article V of this Declaration. The maximum roof height of Lots 1 to 21 shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet above top of curb at the center of the lot. (Amended and deleted 3-14-2000 prior to sale of lots 1-21 to Concordia) ARTICLE V ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE COMMITTEE Section 5.01 Members of Committee. The Architectural and Landscape Committee, sometimes referred to in this Declaration as the "Committee," shall consist of representatives of Declarant whose business address is P.O. Box 7000-311, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91701. Declarant shall have the unrestricted right to appoint and remove a majority of the members of the Committee and to fill any vacancy of such majority of the members of the Committee and to fill any vacancy of such majority until Page 883 the "turnover date" which shall be the date on which either (1) ninety percent (90%) of the lots subject to this Declaration have been sold and the deeds recorded ("Close of Escrow"), or (2) five years following the date of issuance of the Final Subdivision Public Report for the Project, whichever occurs earlier. Declarant may at any time assign in writing such powers of removal and appointment to any developer of Lots in the Project, subject to such terms and conditions as Declarant may impose. Commencing one (1) year from the date of Close of Escrow for the sale of the first Lot in the Project to a purchaser (other than a developer) from Declarant, the Owners of a majority of the Lots (excluding Lot owned by Declarant) shall have the power to appoint in writing one (1) member to the Committee, until the turnover date. Thereafter, the Owners of a majority of the Lots (including Lots owned by Declarant) shall have the power to appoint and remove all of the members of the Committee. Members of the Committee appointed to the Committee by Declarant need not be residents of the Project but all other members of the Committee must be full time residents of the Project. Section 5.02 Meetings of the Committee The Committee shall meet from time to time as necessary to perform its duties hereunder. The Committee may from time to time, by resolution unanimously adopt in writing, designate a Committee Representative (who may, but need not, be one of its members) to take any action or perform any duties for and on behalf of the Committee, except the granting of variances pursuant to Section 5.08 hereof. In the absence of such designation, the vote or the written consent of a majority of the Committee taken without a meeting shall constitute an act of the Committee. Section 5.03 No Waiver of Future Approvals. The approval of the Committee to any proposals or plans and specifications or drawings for any work done or proposed or in connection with any other matter requiring the approval and consent of the Committee shall not be deemed to constitute a waiver of any right to withhold approval or consent as to any similar proposals, plans and specifications, drawings or matter whatever subsequently or additionally submitted for approval or consent. Section 5.04 Compensation of Members. The members of the Committee shall receive no compensation for services rendered, other than reimbursement for expenses actually incurred by them in the performance of their duties hereunder. Section 5.05 Correction of Defects. Inspection of work and correction of defects therein shall proceed as follows: (a) The Committee or its duly authorized representative may at any time inspect any Improvement for which approval of plans is required under this Article V provided, however, that the Committee's right of inspection of Improvements for which plans have been submitted and approved shall terminate sixty (60) days after such work of improvement shall have been completed and the respective Owner shall have given written notice to the Committee of such completion. The Committee's rights of inspection shall not terminate pursuant to this paragraph in the event that plans for the work of Improvement have not previously been submitted to and approved by the Committee. If, as a result of such inspection, the Committee finds that such Improvement was done without obtaining approval of the plans therefore or was not done in substantial compliance with the plans approved by the Committee, it shall notify the Owner in writing of failure to comply with this Article V within sixty (60) days from the inspection, specifying the particulars of noncompliance. The Committee shall have the authority to require the Owner to take such action as may be necessary to remedy the noncompliance. Page ASS (b) If upon the expiration of sixty (60) days from the date of such notification, the Owner shall have failed to remedy such noncompliance, the Committee shall determine the estimated cost of correcting or removing the same, and the Committee, at its option, may record a notice of noncompliance in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino and may peacefully remedy the noncompliance ,and the Owner shall reimburse the Committee, upon demand, for all expenses incurred in connection therewith. If such expenses are not promptly repaid by the Owner to the Committee, then the Committee shall have all rights at law or in equity to collect such expenses, in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.01 of this Declaration. (c) If for any reason the Committee fails to notify the Owner of any noncompliance with previously submitted and approved plans within sixty (60) days after receipt of said written notice of completion from the Owner, the Improvement shall be deemed to be in accordance with said approved plans. Section 5.06 Non -Liability of Committee Members. Neither Declarant, the Committee nor any member thereof, nor their duly authorized representative shall be liable to any Owner for any loss, damage or injury arising out of or in any way connected with the performance of the Committee's duties hereunder, unless due to the willful misconduct or bad faith of the Committee. The Committee shall review and approve or disapprove all plans submitted to it for any proposed Improvement, alteration or addition, on the basis of satisfaction of the Committee with the grading plan, location of the Improvements on the Lot, the finished ground elevation, the color scheme, finish, design, proportions, architecture, shape, height, style and appropriateness of proposed Improvements to view from adjoining Lots, the materials used therein, the kinds, pitch or type of roof proposed to be place thereon, the planting landscaping, size, height or location of vegetation on a lot, or on the basis of aesthetic considerations and the overall benefit or detriment which would result to the immediate vicinity and the Project generally. The Committee shall take into consideration the aesthetic aspects of the architectural designs, placement of buildings, landscaping, color schemes, exterior finishes and material and similar feature, but shall not be responsible for reviewing, not shall its approval of any plans or design be deemed approval of, any plan or design from the standpoint of structural safety or conformance with building or other codes. Section 5.07. Variances. The Committee may authorize variances from compliance with any of the architectural provisions of this Declaration, including without limitation restrictions upon height, size, floor area or placement of structures, or similar restrictions when circumstances such as topography, natural obstructions, hardship, aesthetic or environmental consideration may require. Such variances must be evidenced in writing, must be signed by at least a majority of the Committee and shall become effective upon recordation in the Office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino. If such variances are granted, no violation of the covenants, conditions, and restrictions contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to have occurred with respect to the matter for which the variance was granted. The granting of such a variance shall not operate to waive any of the terms and provisions of this Declaration for any purpose except as to the particular property and particular provision hereof covered by the variance, not shall it affect in any way the Owner's obligation to comply with all governmental laws and regulations affecting the use of his Lot, including but not limited to zoning ordinances and Lot setback lines or requirements imposed by any governmental authority. Page 8811 Section 8.04 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who owns, occupies or acquires any right, title, estate or interest in or to any Lot or other portion of the Project does and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to the reasonableness and binding effect of every limitation, restriction, easement, reservation, condition and covenant contained herein, whether or not any reference to Declaration is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project, or any portion thereof. Page 880 EXHIBIT 6 PLANNING STAFF POWERPOINT Page A®41 Jane and John Adams 8045 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 605-3312 September 26, 2019 Via Certified Mail #70171070 0000 3406 1225 Mr. John R. Gllllson City Manager City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Dear Mr. Gillison: RE: THE HILLSIDE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO CAMINO PREDERA IN THE RED HILL AREA am appalled, bewildered and disheartened. My husband and I are owners of Lot 12 of Tract 10035 otherwise known as 8045 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, along with two (2) adjoining vacant lots (Lot 11 and Lot 10), all which we purchased 12 years ago. The land Is governed by the Hillside Development Ordinance and located in the Red Hill area. 8045 was purchased with approved pians and we built the house pursuant to those plans, over a decade ago. Our intent was to build two more houses, in the future, for family members. Our expectation was that we could build similarly in accordance with the plans approved for Lot 12. As I am sure you may already be aware that since 2004 ---and before ---Lots 1-21 of Tract 10035 have been the subject of much discussion at the "Neighborhood Meetings" (which often turned venomous), the Planning Department, Design Review Committee, Planning Commission and City Council. Applicants desiring to building on those lots have been denied, discouraged and derailed with obstructive and irrational objections. Notwithstanding the fact that an applicant may have met all the technical requirements, they have been forced to attend meeting after meeting, multiple resubmissions of their plans and delays of, not just months, but years! ---all In an effort to appease a handful of vocal opposition, who is willing to mount an onslaught of objections and appeals. What I have witnessed over all this time is that the City of Rancho Cucamonga, appearing to "take sides", has provided the same few individuals (hereinafter referred to as "dissenters") a platform from which they have created dissension among the residents of Red Hill and lashed out with ad hominem attacks at applicants during many meetings. I have recorded a litany of statements made during some of these meeting just as an example: "You might reconsider building a two-story house, as you're getting older and climbing stairs will become more difficult." WHATI I??? This is a valid objection to an applicant's otherwise complete plans???? Who is running these departments? From our vantage point, it looks like the dissenters are In controll So, here we are, 12 years later, and are ready to begin building on the other two lots. However, what we have encountered within the planning department has left us shocked and dismayed. Page A®8 Mr. John R. Glllison -2- September 26, 2019 There is a movement afoot (and consultants, Civic Solutions, hired) to begin work on amending the Hillside Development Ordinance found In Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. We strongly oblectl NOTHING has changed in the past 12 years that would require amending the hillside standards— NOTHING has changed since the July 7, 2004 appeal to City Council where these dissenters lost their appeal on every level. Nonetheless, they are once again expressing their disagreement with the decisions against them made by the local authorities, notwithstanding the fact that there were NUMEROUS thorough and de novo reviews by each department. Instead of taking their issues up for a judicial review, they continue objecting to most projects. In my opinion, it is a blatant attempt to discourage anyone from building on the southside of Camino Predera. We are not discouraged. I apologize for the length of this letter but I feel it necessary to explain our personal dilemma with any proposed changes to the Hillside Ordinance. I quote from a letter written by dissenters Chuck and Suzanne Buquet, dated April 5, 2004 and presented as an exhibit in the July 7, 2004 City Council agenda, involving our lot #12. The appeal was denied. The Buquet's wrote, and I quote, "We believe that a master plan approach should be undertaken to determine what would be reasonable and prudent residential product along the entire hillside slope area, and not just on a case by case basis as currently being provided under the Individual lot development strategy..." The Buquet's "master plan approach" is inconceivable. All one need do is visually inspect Camino Predera to see that each and every southside lot is unique. It only makes sense that each lot should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, taking Into consideration the topography. Our three lots are above curb and, therefore, we paid a premium for those lots. To reduce our ability to build out our remaining two lots in the same manner we built the first lot would create an unjust and unreasonable result. First and foremost, the houses directly across the street from us are two and three-story. As is the situation with our current house, the height is 14' above curb level; at that height, the houses on the north side are so high that they look directly over our property. As for requiring us to push the house further below the curb not only makes It much more difficult and costly to accomplish because of the steepness but doing so would eliminate ANY view our "view lot" could have because of the protected silk oak trees at the bottom of the lot, along with the row of townhouses, blocking ANY view. We would literally be in the gully. I will repeat Councilmember Howdyshell's sentiments at the July 7, 2004 Council Meeting, that he could not imagine somebody wanting to build on a hill and then accepting a requirement to set their house down In a hole. I agree, and I add: Talk about diminution in value??11?? Another dissenter and appellant, Renee Massey, already acknowledged at the July 7, 2004 City Council Meeting, where one of her appeals was heard, that the "crux of the matter" was if this project were approved ( DRC2003-00961--referring to our house, lot #12) It would set the standard for the rest of the lot -by -lot development. This project was approved. I believe the standard has been set. I am aware that the Hillside Development Ordinance requires a four -pronged approach to analysis for approval of a project. However, I do have some questions as to how, why and who initiated action for amendment of this code. But I will refrain from expounding on that at this juncture. Suffice it to say that Page A®® Mr. John R. Gillison -3- September 26, 2019 any development will change and/or impede the view prior to the development. Our city's development code is replete with discretion provided to the decision -makers (and I don't mean the dissenters) to further the General Plan and allow for reasonable development of land. However, our city's Development Code also boldly asserts that applicants should attempt to minimize view obstruction -----understanding that it is generally Impossible to eliminate view obstruction. Title 17 expressly provides for specific procedures in order to initiate action for amendments to the Code. The city's website states that citizens rely on the city manager to "provide complete and objective information, pros and cons of alternatives, on long-term consequences." There are other lot owners on Camino Predera who are similarly situated and express utter frustration, as it appears that no one from the city is listening to the remaining vacant lot owners of Tract 10035. In fact, the DRC is supposed to "...provide direction to applicants regarding their development application." My experience and observations have shown that not to be the case. Obstructing and ignoring concerns that are not aligned with the dissenters seems prejudicial. Therefore, we ask that you look more deeply into the appropriateness of this movement by a handful of dissenters to amend the Code. My husband and I ask: For what purpose does the Code require amending? As this movement is steamrolling over others' rights, I ask that you keep in mind the Mission Statement for the City of Rancho Cucamonga to "make decisions, and be perceived as making decisions, for the general welfare of the community." And not for a few favored dissenters. I thank you for your time and my husband, John Adams, who has been a general contractor for over 47 years, wishes to address each proposed amendment as provided at the September 9, 2019 "Community Workshop #2". His comments are attached along with the proposed amendments. I hope you can understand and appreciate OUR concerns. We welcome your comments. Sincerely, Jane Adams Cc: L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Anne McIntosh, Planning Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner Jean Ward, AICP (Civic Solutions) Page ABS I have heard a lot of comments about Red Hill's character and how special Camino Predera is and I feet most of it has been mischaracterized. I have lived in Rancho Cucamonga since 1985 and have lived on Camino Predera for the past ten years. While the view Is wonderful, it is also a great burden. People stop in front of the empty lots to see the view (even though It is posted "no stopping "at anytime, people somehow feel It Is their right to eat their food, drink their beers and do their drugs. Then they feel they have the right to get out of their cars and trespass on my land (which I had posted no trespassing until they tore the signs down) and then throw all their trash on my property and/or in the street. Much more goes on than I can put in this letter. The street also has a very steep incline often used by skaters and bike riders as a racetrack. Lots of cars also use this downhill as a raceway; so many cars in fact, that we would not allow our granddaughter to play in the front yard with all the people coming to this "view" and the homeless living at the bottom of each property. The neighborhood has also experienced a lot of break- ins, drug use, vandalism, littering and trespassing that we never witnessed living in other Rancho neighborhoods. My point is this is not the paradise some are proclaiming it to be. It could be a great street to live on, but It needs houses and neighbors. There are dissenters who do not want any development—or so it seems. I fear that adding more restrictions to the standards will keep development from happening. I also fear that that these same individuals would welcome the new restrictions but, nonetheless, continue rejecting designs. There are a lot of changes being proposed for a couple of unhappy homeowners, with talk of overbuilding, massing and mansionization. There are no mansions that have been built on this street, but with the high cost of building on a hillside lot, one needs to build a house with enough square footage to recoup one's investment upon resale. None of the houses built in the last twenty years are tiny houses. Does this not set a precedent? Therefore, I would like to address each proposed change to the current Hillside Design Standards, as it relates to our two vacant lots, adjoining 8045 Camino Predera, our current residence. (1) SIDE YARD SETBACKS - WE ARE 100% AGAINST INCREASING SIDE YARD SETBACKS. OUR LOT IS 76' ACROSS THE FRONT, WHICH IS NOT WIDE TO START WITH. A REDUCTION OF 25'Taking 25' LEAVES A TOTAL OF 51' CREATING EXTREME DIFFICULTY IN DESIGN. MOREOVER, THE HOUSES ACROSS THE STREET ARE SO HIGH THEY WILL LOOK RIGHT OVER THE TOP OF OUR PROPOSED HOUSE BASED UPON OUR LOT LOCATION. I HAVE PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE AS I HAVE BEEN INSIDE EVERY HOUSE ACROSS THE STREET FROM OUR LOTS. LARGER SETBACKS ALSO CREATES A PRIVACY ISSUE FOR US. AS FAR AS REDUCING VISUAL MASSING FROM THE STREET THIS IS A NEIGHBORHOOD STREET (LOCAL ROAD) AND, TO MY KNOWEDGE, WE HAVE NO LEGAL OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE VIEWS TO THE PUBLIC. THERE ARE MORE THAN 60+ HOUSE ON CAMINO PREDERA AND ADJACENT CUL-DE-SACS WITH A 10' AND 5' SETBACKS. IT IS UNFAIR AND UNNECESSARY TO SO ADVERSELY IMPACT THE FEW REMAINING LOTS. Page 1 of 3 Page 888 (2) REDUCE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT - THE HOUSE WE LIVE IN NOW HAS A HEIGHT OF 14' ABOVE CURB. THE HOUSE WAS LOWERED THREE TO FOUR FEET TO ACHIEVE THIS. OUR TWO REMAINING LOTS ARE ABOVE CURB HEIGHT. THE LOWER THE ROOF, THE LOWER THE HOUSE HAS TO BE PUSHED DOWN IN THE LOT AND THE DRIVEWAY BECOMES STEEPER. OUR HOUSE NOW HAS A SINGLE -STORY APPEARANCE FROM THE STREET AND ALL THE HOUSES ON THE NORTH SIDE HAVE MORE VISUAL MASS THAN OURS. (3) ROOF DESIGN - A HIP ROOF WOULD ALSO CREATE TRIANGLE EFFECTS. (4) VARIABLE FRONT YARD SETBACKS - ALL THE LOTS THAT ARE LEFT ARE GOING TO BE CUSTOM HOUSES. IF IT`S A GREAT DESIGN I CANNOT UNDESTAND HOW A CONTINUOUS WALL PLANE TAKES ANYTHING AWAY FROM THE NEIGHBORHOOD. (5) ARTICULATION AND VARIABLE WALL PLANES -SIDE YARD THIS WOULD PUT MASSIVE RESTRICTIONS ON NEW HOMES AND MAKE DESIGNING EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. (6) FLOOR PLANS - THIS IS BASICALLY THE DESIGN I AM PROPOSING WITH THE HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS NOW IN EFFECT. HOWEVER, IF THE PROPOSED STANDARDS PRODUCE A ROW OF NARROW HOUSES, WHAT AN UNFLATTERING LOOK FOR THE STREET THIS WOULD CREATE. (7) RAISE THE HEIGHT OF RETAINING WALLS - IN MY OPINION, THIS SHOULD HAVE BEEN A STANDARD ALL ALONG. EVEN THE CITY'S OWN ENGINEER SAID THAT MOST LOTS WILL NOT WORK WITH THE CURRENT STANDARDS. (8) GRADING- FLEXIBILITY TO BUILD LOWER ON THE LOT I HAVE A LEVEL LOT. THERE IS NO REASON FOR ME TO BUILD LOWER ON THE LOT. Page 2 of 3 Page REBS (9) STEP BACK SECOND STORY WALL PLANE - ALL BUT ONE LOT ARE DOWN -HILL SLOPES. NO ONE CAN SEE MASSING GOING DOWN HILL. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THREE LOTS, ONE CANNOT SEE THE PROPERTIES FROM FOOTHILL BOULEVARD DUE TO THE THREE-STORY CONDOS AND EXISTING TREES. IAM CONFUSED AS TO WHY THIS IS EVEN A CONSIDERATION. MY FINAL REMARKS - As we can build on our two lots using the current Hillside Design standards and not eliminate anyone's view, we feel that if these new standards are implemented, they would greatly take away from what we should be able to build, make the house less desirable and devalue our property. If these proposed changes were guidelines to be considered on a lot -by -lot evaluation based upon the topography rather than as standards to be strictly applied, it seems more plausible and just. The current vacant lot owners should be afforded the same considerations as the current homeowners. It does NOT feel like that. Reasonable expectation is a legal term that I believe applies to our property. We live in a house on the south side that was approved by staff, DRC, Planning and ultimately by city council. When we bought these two lots over ten years ago, we had a reasonable expectation that we would be able to build houses on these lots in the same manner as the one we live In now. Should the proposed changes be implemented, our future projects will be greatly diminished and so, too, will our ability to fully utilize our lots to their fullest capacity. in my opinion, such a taking of a property -owner's rights without a legitimate reason is unconscionable. Thank you for your patience in reading the detailed description of my concerns over changes to the Hillside Design standards. I hope you can appreciate my concerns. I am open for further discussion on any of these issues as they relate to my property. Sincerely, John I. Adams, Homeowner 8045 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-322-3850 Page 3 of 3 Page B®g October 6, 2019 To: City Staff, Planning Commission Members, Mayor and Members of the City Council; I very much appreciate that our long time concerns are being taken seriously, with the recent Hillside Development Standards meetings. As you know, we have been dealing with the same issues again and again since 2000. These are the very last remaining hillside view lots in Red Hill and once they are gone that's it, no do overs. And just a quick bit of history dating back to 2004 and in response to Renee and Lynn Massey's Appeal 2nd appeal, the City Council was very clear as to their concern with the size and scale of new homes going in, hillside grading concerns, and keeping the distinctive residential character of the area, as well as consideration of view sharing. Yet sadly here we are again, neighbors who are put right back in the middle of this. Mr. Bardos, who purchased this vacant lot back in 2008, only purchased it to "protect his view" which he told us while he was our next store neighbor. He was also the one who built the f irst McMansion on our street. And while he is very proud of that fact, it has forever changed the character of our neighborhood and not for the better in my humble option. He f irst f iled the residential application with the City in early 2017, and has not once come to us to discuss his plans. Yet our home is the one most impacted by this new McMansion version of Page 889 some plans he found apparently found somewhere. Instead he has tried to work everyone else he thought he could on our street, and now is doing his continuing best bullying practices to move this forward, and will say and do anything to get his way. This is and always has been about what is best for his personal prof its and he personally has no care or concern about the neighborhood. At the Community meeting he suggested the neighbors offer comments, but he was not open to anything that was suggested as to lowering the profile of the house or dropping it down, or even changing the roof profile. He kept saying it was "physics" and suggesting our simple minds could not understand that, and any of our "oh so silly" ideas could not be done. Threw up his hands and said he had done all he could do. All I see is yet another huge house that covers the entire front of the lot, blocks out the sun from our house looking to the east, lacks 360 degree architecture or anything of interest on the sides and is totally view focused on the back of the house. (Profit NOT Community/Neighborhood driven) One of my major questions and concerns is, since he personally seems to have prepared all of the plans, where is any official verification as to his grading analysis, slopes or even ability to build this huge house on this lot? He makes a lot of claims as to why he can't lower the house or driveway or do this or that, but there is no Engineering Professional or Reports to validate anything that he has drawn on the plans. And after all these Page M years of this spin and nonsense, I am simply not very trusting any longer. I am shocked that someone can get this far down the road on a hillside, with a dif f icult lot to build on with no legal verification by an Engineering Professional willing to put his stamp on plans at a minimum. And I honestly think the City, Planning Commission and City Council should be concerned too. Respectfully, Suzanne Buquet 8725 Predera Court Rancho Cucamonga Page NO Re: Amendments to 17.122.020 Hillside Development Standards A very special thank you to the city of Rancho Cucamonga for taking the time and expending the effort to listen to the residents of the beautiful Red Hill Community. The workshops held by the Planning Department give me hope that the integrity and heritage of our neighborhood will be maintained and that the great "view grab" will cease to occur. Unfortunately, yet again we, the Red Hill Residents find ourselves very concerned with the prospective builds on Camino Pedrera, especially with the latest "Mc Mansion" home project designed by builder Paul Bardo. This project is on the south side of Camino Pedrera. This builder has shown a complete lack of respect and is remarkably hostile to the residents of both Red Hill and especially to those of Camino Pedrera. This builder doesn't choose to work with the residents instead at meetings he prefers to bully and insult the residents and the city for that matter. Mr. Bardo is so arrogant that he stated last year, in a city board meeting, that his design/build in Red Hill was the first one -million -dollar home, unfortunately, money and his aggression towards the residents is driving his motives, not common courtesy. The residents of Camino Pedrera will lose their view and see their property values decline. There are other vacant lots and if this build is allowed versus working with the residents to push it lower, that only the roof is seen from the street, as has been repeatedly discussed, it will be a free for all with the remaining vacant lots on Camino Pedrera. More importantly we will be faced with the same battle that we have been faced with repeatedly over the years. This builder repeatedly states we are too ignorant to know enough about the physics of building and he absolutely cannot drop this home that only a rooftop is seen from the street. The residents do not trust his motives and we do not trust that he will listen to a word the city says. The city has been to my house, has admired my beautiful views, and clearly can see that in order to protect the residents on the North side of Red Hill CC Drive, back in 1978 the houses were dropped very low. When did this common courtesy and the notion of view sharing ever stop? The "Mc Mansions" built circa 2004/2005 stand out like a sore thumb and look awful too large for the lot they are on. The envelope has been pushed way too far and residents are at their breaking point. Kudos to the latest project underway, owner Danny Dera, he appears to be building a beautiful property and instinctively is not obstructing anyone's view. He has proved it can be done so for Mr. Bardo to bully his way with the city officials and the residents and claim we are too stupid to understand the physics of building is disgraceful. If allowed it will set the stage for the demise of historic Red Hill. The cascading views that have attracted so many will be robbed by this builder and others on the vacant lots, and potential tear downs and the integrity of this beautiful community gone forever. Don't let this be your legacy for Rancho Cucamonga's most historical community. Sincerely, Rakan and Maria Alamat 8551 Red Hill Country Club Drive Rancho Cucamonga Page a®g October 7,2019 To: City Staff, Chairman and Planning Commission Members, Mayor and Members of the City Council From: Thomas Snedeker (8080 Camino Predera, Rancho Cucamonga) R.E. Amendments to 17.122.020 Hillside Development Standards I am writing this letter on behalf of myself and other concerned residents who live in Red Hill and specifically on Camino Predera. I have attended both of the meetings/workshops instituted by the Planning Department which were extremely informative with respect to Hillside Development Standards (17.122.020). At the meeting on September 9, 2019, we were encouraged by the Planning Department Members proposed Amendments to these standards which include but not limited to reducing the maximum building height, grading changes, the increasing of the side yard set backs and changing the maximum height of retaining walls. As a resident of Red Hill/Camino Predera for the past 30 years, my greatest interests are to maintain the character of our neighborhood while providing adequate view sharing for all who live there now and in the future. I want to thank the Planning Department and the City Council for all the time and interest you have given to our concerns and for future considerations in this matter. Since ely, Thomas Snedeker 8080 Camino Predera Rancho Cucamonga, Ca. 91730 Page AIS Tabe, 'T/ZTli-? .21+3 PI", I would like some clarity on staffs position on our submittal. I've asked several times for a statement of its position and for several weeks. Is staff going to recommend the project and if not why not? Please be specific when describing staffs position. My understanding after several months of discussion with you and the neighbors is that the neighbor's objections center primarily around view obstruction. Is there any other issue you're aware of that is relevant to the approvals of our project as we move forward? You've previously indicated our submittal meets the Code. When I spoke with jean she said she would meet with staff and provide me some insight into the changes to the Code planning intends to propose prior to their being addressed at the upcoming 8/9 meeting. Do you have those recommendations with the thought l can look at possibly incorporating them to enhance our designs prior to meeting with DRC? I also want to reiterate conversations we've had previously about public policy throughout the state on view obstruction. The statewide policy is quite harsh and definitive on the subject and runs strongly against the neighbors who have expressed a right that is not protected in California. The precedent was first established in 1898 by the California Supreme Court and is still good law today. Has anyone from staff reviewed public policy on the question of view rights to see if positions being taken now are in compliance with statewide mandates and precedents? It's my understanding DRC meets "as needed." The October 1 date doesn't work for us. Can we set a date prior to October 1 to meet? There are several other property owners on the south side of Camino Predera who have also indicated an interest in attending, and I would like the date to work for all those who've expressed an interested being there. Thanks in advance for your help with these questions. Best, Paul Page A4® From: Van der Zwaag, Tabe[mailto:Tabe.VanderZwaag@cityofrc.usj Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:50 PM To: Paul Subject: RE: DRC It is too late to get on a September DRC. The next available DRC will be October 151. You will need to submit 10 sets of plans prior to September 17`h to be on that DRC. As discussed in a prior conversation, the neighbors will more than likely be in attendance at the DRC. The Planning Commissioners are also aware that the Planning Department is working on new regulations for the Red Full area. With neighbor opposition, there is a good chance that they would not recommend approval by the Planning Commission. Tabe From: Paul < aul bardosconstruction.com> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 11:07 AM To: Van der Zwaag, Tabe <Tabe.VanderZwaag@citvofrc.us> Subject: DRC �CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or o e achments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Tabe, When is the next DRC meeting in September? 1'd like to get on calendar for it. l left several messages for Matt to return my calls but so far he's not responded. 1 also left a message for his administrative assistant who also hasn't responded to my voicemail. Paul Page 899 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag October 15, 2019 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. Related Records: Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Site Characteristics: The 15,430 square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera, within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The property dimensions are approximately 80 feet along the north property line, 195 feet along the east property line, 189 feet along the west property line, and 80 feet along the south property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 1,301 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line and an elevation of approximately 1,260 feet as measured along the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 41 feet. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Proiect Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, singlefamily residence along with an attached 771 square foot garage on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (5400t max cut or fill for Planning Director approval). Architecture: The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a pitched concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage door facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17,122.020.C,1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are Exhibit D Page A8® Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Low (L) Residential District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District South Low (L) Residential District Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District East Low (L) Residential District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Hillside Overlay District Proiect Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, singlefamily residence along with an attached 771 square foot garage on the 15,430 square foot project site. The proposed grading includes up to 8 feet of cut, which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (5400t max cut or fill for Planning Director approval). Architecture: The proposed residence has a craftsman design theme, which includes a pitched concrete tile roof, horizontal wood siding, shake siding and a river rock wainscot. The proposed 4,118 square foot residence consists of a 2,352 square foot upper level, which includes the main living area and master bedroom, and a 1,766 square lower level, which includes 3 bedrooms and a bonus room. The upper and lower levels each include decks along the south elevations. The 771 square foot three -car garage is located on the upper level of the residence, with the garage door facing Camino Predera. The driveway has a maximum grade of 15 percent. Hillside Development Standard 17,122.020.C,1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are Exhibit D Page A8® DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 2 permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. Low Residential District Code Compliance: The project complies with the current development requirements of the Trow (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District as shown in the following table (it should be noted that the City is in the process of developing new development criteria for Camino Predera): Development Criteria Requirement Proposed Front Yard Setback 37 feet 60 feet Side Yard Setbacks 5 and 10 feet 5 and 10 feet Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 85 feet Lot Coverage 40 percent 32 percent Building Height Overall 30 feet 30 feet Building Height at Curb Face 10.5 feet Retaining Wall Height 4 feet max 5 feet Cut/Fill 5 feet 11.5' Feet *Grading in Excess of 5 feet Requires Planning Commission Approval Retaining Walls: The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 -feet with a minimum 3 -foot separation between the stepped walls. The project includes retaining walls up to 5 feet -2 inches. The additional retaining wall height is necessary to lower the foundation of the residence to reduce the height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. The applicant has filed a Minor Exception request for the additional wall height. A Minor Exception permits an additional 2 feet in building height above the maximum permitted wall height. Perimeter Walls and Fencing: There is an existing combination wall and wrought iron fence along the west elevation that was constructed with the development of the single-family residence to the west. The applicant proposes an up to 4 -foot retaining wall topped by a 5 -foot wrought -iron fence along the east property line. A 6 -foot -high wrought fence is proposed along the south elevation. The proposed perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., which encourages the use of open -view fencing and having walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. Grading The proposed grading design includes 784 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,296 feet and the lower garage pad at an elevation of 1,285, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Building Envelope Analysis: Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30 -foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north -south and two east -west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30 -foot height requirement. The height of the residence ranges Page ARS DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 3 from approximately 10 -feet and 6 -inches, along the east side of the residence, to 6 -feet and 11 - inches, along the west side of the residence, as measured above curb face on Camino Predera. Landscape: The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the installation of a permanent irrigation system landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or within a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. The rear yard includes slope planting to prevent erosion. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting in the Rains Room at City Hall on June 10, 2019, with approximate 20 residents in attendance. The applicant provided an overview of the project and fielded questions. The residents raised concerns related to the building height as seen from Camino Predera, the width of the residence (built to the minimum 5- and 10 - foot setbacks), and the size of the residence as compared to older homes along Camino Predera. The applicant responded that lowering the residence would steepen the driveway to the point that it would be difficult to navigate, that reducing the width of the residence would make it difficult to construct a 3 -car garage and that the size of the residence is in keeping with the existing residences most recently constructed along Camino Predera. The neighbors stated that the size of the recently constructed residences along Camino Predera is not in keeping with the intent of Hillside Design regulations and is too large compared to the older residences constructed along the street. Staff Comments Over the years, the City has received numerous concerns and complaints from neighborhood residents in response to projects along the south side of Camino Pradera. Generally, neighborhood residents have expressed concern that these projects are not compatible with the existing neighborhood. Specifically, as it relates to this development application, concerns as expressed at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, involve the height, width, and size of the proposed residence. As expressed by residents at the Neighborhood Meeting, a primary concern is that recently constructed and/or proposed residences, including the subject application, which have typically ranged from 3,500 to 5,000 square feet, are much larger and inconsistent with older residences which dominate the character of the established neighborhood and which typically range in size from 2,400 to 3,000 square feet. In addition, staff feels that the proposed project does not meet the intent of the existing Hillside Development regulations. For example, the applicant proposes to build to the minimum side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet whereas Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a explicitly discourages this and recommends increased side yard setbacks to avoid the appearance of overbuilding of lots, among other design guidelines. Regarding concerns of "compatibility," the General Plan provides qualitative language which may be applied to the subject development application. For example, Policy LU -2.4 could be interpreted to apply to this project. This General Plan policy aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." Further, the discussion section of this policy states that "The General Plan encourages the development of vacant residential lots where they are largely surrounded by other residential development to maximize efficient use of existing infrastructure and to meet housing demand. Land use controls that include development standards will ensure that infill development is compatible with neighboring uses." Page 400 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 4 While the proposed project meets the current development standards, and while the Development Code does not provide an objective definition of the term "compatibility," the proposed development requires discretionary review by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 17.16.140.8.1 and Section 17.122.020.G.i of the Development Code. As such, certain findings are required to be made, including a finding that a proposed project must be consistent with the General Plan (Section 17.16.140.F.1). In summary, staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend that the Planning Commission deny the subject application for the following reasons: Project Conflicts with Intent of Hillside Design Guidelines: The project proposes to build to the minimum side setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, which conflicts with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. Project Is Incompatible with Existing Neighborhood: At 4,118 square feet, the proposed residence is significantly larger than older existing residences within the established neighborhood which range on average from approximately 2,400 to 3,000 square feet. Project is Inconsistent with General Plan: General Plan Policy LU -2.4 promotes "complementary infill development... that contributes positively to the surrounding neighborhood." As evidenced by comments received at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, and considering long-standing concerns regarding the scale of other development proposed along the south side of Camino Predera, the proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4. Notably, and in order to address long-standing concerns of neighborhood compatibility, Planning Department staff, at the request of the City Council, have initiated a separate process to reevaluate certain hillside development standards, namely building height, setbacks and grading standards. This process is ongoing as of the writing of this report. Regarding architectural concerns, and in the event that the applicant were to revise the project into a development which would be acceptable to staff, staff recommends that the applicant increase side yard setbacks and step the upper level of the residence from the lower level. Staff also recommends that additional design enhancements are needed to the side elevations of the residence to better characterize the craftsman architectural design theme. Staff recommends that wood siding used on the front and rear elevations be continued to the side elevations of the second (upper) story. Major Issues: Staff does not support the proposed project for the reasons explained above. Discuss whether the committee should recommend approval or denial of the project design to the Planning Commission. Page 404 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS October 15, 2019 Page 5 Secondary Issues: Whether the side elevations of the 2nd (upper) story should be upgraded to include wood siding to match the front and rear elevations to provide 360 -degree architecture. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend that the Planning Commission deny the subject application. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Staff Coordinator: David Eoff, Senior Planner Attachment: Letters of project opposition Page 408 ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA ZM i,:aal1 CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7:00pm Roll Call: Ray Wimberly x Tony M. Guglielmo x David Eoff Alternates: Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca Additional Staff Present: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following Page 1 of 3 Page 400 each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE C1. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00912 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00205 — PHELAN DEVELOPMENT - A request to develop an 11.73 acre site with three (3) industrial/warehouse buildings totaling 236,534 square feet within the General Industrial (GI) District, located on the north side of 91" Street, west of Vineyard Avenue, at 8768 91' Street — APN: 0207-262-28, 0207-262-35, 0207-262-36, 0207-262-41, and 0207-262-42. Related File: Minor Exception DRC2019-00205. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. The project was approved as presented_ The Design Review Committee's only concern was the outstanding purchase agreement with the parcel of land at the southeast corner of the project site. They recommended that the applicant clarify this issue by the time that the project is reviewed by the Planning Commission. C2. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00244 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. Related Records: Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The Design Review Committee moved the project forward to the full Planning Commission without recommendation. The Committee informed the applicant that they faced challenges ahead for the PC to approve a project that is opposed by residents in the surrounding area. Page 2 of 3 Page 4041 D. ADJOURNMENT 8:30pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, October 10, 2019 at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Ifpecial assistance or accommo dations to participate in this meeting, please contact the epartment at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the a reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for impaired. Page 3 of 3 Page 400 Camino Predera Data- House Size 3912.208333 Total Average for 1980s Address APN # Year Built or (year approved if not yet constructed) Building Permit (Combined residence, garage, porches, decks, etc) Notes Total Average for 2010s 4237.666667 Southside of Camino Predera Average 3918.285714 North side of Camino Predera 7966 Camino Predera 0207-631-24 1988 3061 7978 Camino Predera 0207-631-25 1988 3061 8034 Camino Predera 0207-631-21 2007 4844 8044 Camino Predera 0207-631-22 2007 3974 8054 Camino Predera 0207-631-23 2008 5369 8062 Camino Predera 0207-641-11 2006 3734 Galvan Residence 0207-641-12 (Approved 12/18) 4950 8072 Camino Predera 0207-641-13 1987 3194 8080 Camino Predera 0207-641-14 1989 2980 8088 Camino Predera 0207-641-15 1989 3012 Predera Court cul-de-sac 8714 Predera Court 0207-631-17 1995 6188 8715 Predera Court 0207-631-18 2007 5273 8720 Predera Court 0207-631-16 2002 3654 8721 Predera Court 0207-631-19 2002 3232 8725 Predera Court 0207-631-20 1989 3605 No bldg permit for house. County PIMS data 8728 Predera Court 0207-631-15 2003 3348 No bldg permit for house. County PIMS data 8736 Predera Court 0207-631-14 1989 2986 Southside of Camino Predera 7957 Camino Predera 0207-631-11 2004 4110 7967 Camino Predera 0207-631-10 2004 3682 7979 Camino Predera 0207-631-09 2004 3526 7997 Camino Predera 0207-631-07 2004 3975 8045 Camino Predera 0207-631-02 2008 4372 8083 Camino Predera 0207-641-03 (Approved 3/19) 3077 8089 Camino Predera 0207-641-04 (Approved 2/18) 4686 8035 Camino Predera 0207-631-03 1 Proposed Residence (DRC2017-00244 1 5263 5 Total Tract Average 3912.208333 Total Average for 1980s 3128.428571 Total Average for 1990s 6188 Total Average for 2000s 4084.076923 Total Average for 2010s 4237.666667 Southside of Camino Predera Average 3918.285714 Page 488 OWNERS C'E�PT/F/C,4TE /t/E.�,(EPEBY C,5PT/FY 71-147 AE<1RE T,E ONLY A,4�P1/ES 110 01416 gA VY RZ_CO.,PO T/rLE //►'TE�PES! Iry T//E L4N0 _UBO/d/DED ,45SHOWN ,,;;V 11'E ANN",:0IV,4,04NO !YE (U'vs'EN! TD 17h�F P.9IF11 414q- r/ON 4N0 RE(1�RDAl/OPV Lt1�T.y/SF/N,QL M.4P4N0 f'vE.�/E.QEBY DED/C4TE T1� THE (Yll'GF R<!N(ND(L/<,4M0�1/6,4FQQ�BL/('USEO,�iM/NOP4EDEP,4,4N0 LiQEDEQ4 CaC/•4'l. FUrQlf/ER- M�?E H'E4LS0 �EREB�'OED/(��TE 1p T//E(/TYQ� QQNI�/D (L/l"4rONG.4 ,'�/E 0�4.�/N MEMS 4NL7 �f'EfIEREBY /Rf7E{V0G4BL Y OFFER TO 4E0/C,4TE T,yE OI ",4'GOHi E.4sF1VE/Vr,4ND r,4r6 0,Q,41iVQGE ELSE�lE/Vr .45 .syOwrV O/V rA/E .4/✓rYE- .4f' WE HEREBY RFSE,4t/E TO OURSEL YES, 04/R A/E/RS .41VD qSS/ G/VS CEPIA/i✓ BR/✓,4TL� A4,4/NAGE E4SEMENTS AS DEL/il'F4TE0 QN 54/D M,4P OWNERS: RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP BY: WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, ( PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES , LTD. ) BY GEJE 0, TO SEND, ( PARTNER OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO.) �+ GEORG9 0. TOWNSEND �� RN.,4S5OC/4TES A C.4L/FQf1V/4 R,Q.Ql/t/ERSy/P qS ALcAEF/C/,4.QY TOA OEE,D UNDER OFEO OF T.4✓SP.4'ECp.PDEO ''�O'''� �7 /965 .4S //YST•4UMENlNF� /S- 04077 _ QEF/C'/,4L .S'EC?�2405. ..CNN M,4CKEY, NER L �J THE B = 6A .SON, 6E/Y G P4,PlNE.Q H/ ,�/COC.� BO`VM 4/VD SC'yQL',�/TER PkY7F/T S,�f�//✓G' TRUST.4S BENE - F/C/4,PY T014 DEED, UNDER' aFhEOOF7R- 4457 RE40R4!F0 ✓UL Y /O, /984,45/NSTi4C/MEM NO 6� /G2.�8/ OFF�C/qL REC2�PD5. BY E,QT B SC/� CIYTEf? TiQUSTEE MOT wY .4c,Kivowc.=~14 Nr 6TATEOFC,ALIF0RNIA ) COUNTY OF ON TH15 // r//DAY OFF�BRl_14RY )%4 MMPORE Mt, THE UNDCR&I&Nev, A NOTARY PUDLr_ IN AND FM SAID COLWTY ",0 97;77E, .+rc",O.✓,4LLY fn6bR7 B. -ZI�C117 CAM9,wN 7V Me 7V �E ,4 TRUSTEE OF Tf/E TRUST Tf/.4 T E,YECUTEO T,NE /N%T/I/N INSTRUMENT, KND`t/N TD ME TO BE I%eA61R50111 T.�/Ew/lN/N /NSTRUMENI ONBEf14GFOF /W 7W- ,6 'E/N N.4ME0 T,QUST, A/VOgC•t'N0iVLE06ED TO ME 7,-1147 SUC.-/ TRI -IS T EXEC//TED TNF I' III.!/N /N, STf�UMENT ,45 BENEF/C/, 4RY PURSUANT TO /TS 46Y44N/S agGRE5'OLUT/ON OF /TS e04/co 01__ EC,T,,,7R"5' WITNESS MY .4',9N0 ANO OfF/C/.vL sE,oL . laa6f4t.00• I NOTA.?Y AvsL/C /NA.i/0 AW fv/o coddrY,*NO AeY LOAN/SS/ON E,f'P/SES . PP haw't F t i "c T . AVM,CY ,Q'C,t�il/OK/LEA rNE/YTI` 57,4467.01- C4L/f047N/A_ COUNTTY oFLQS ,4NGtLES LvV FEBR!/gRY /ir'f' /9b5 QEFGRE /yc; Tf,�EUr✓OER. S/�,^ lD, .4 /YG. A. 4ND ,rOR .S4/0 srq!'E P�'4SGNOLLY,4�'E,4RED IY/�l Ci,4f?l' ✓•4C�S0/Y A/VO ./i�/N ,AfW'AEY RERPSD/I/,4LL y AWOA VAIN ME lc.W fi�?G/'EO TG ME avr,�/EF o5/SOF -�4T/S F,4CTORl� E{'/DENCEJ "-0,5 A1117i//N /NSl,QU/'�ENT 45 44NE 6E1VE.P4L P4,QlNE.PS O,1' BGH�JLFDF/R// .45SOC/gTEs, THE PARrNERSH/P rAERE/N 111,414jE!' ,4A;'7 4<'<'/YGI Y_' El �6� ', rG �fE Tti!Q� THE F aRrNE.�sNiPEXECI�r_ : ^ AS w/TiYEfJ' A0lrW,%V0, (R off1e1RZ�-- J�Nl fA D S of - so fso 37 IN IN CAM! �4 S NP,rAWY P!/GIL/C /N ",P IVX f,'NP ,4N0 STATE MY fOMM/SS/O.✓ EXP/REs \ �CgLLE /NOEX AND 11/CA117 Y I x.40 /"r 200' Page 40® x(100 xvqAlw SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS TRACT NQ 10035 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA BEING A _"XJWIVIGION OF A FoKrION OF LOT5 7 AND 13, RED H ILL WI3D)VI510N AS PER MAP RE-C,0R 0 1N 600K 21, PAGe'93 OF MA,P5 AND LOT 10, TRACT N9-30(,9 AS PER MAP RMOROED IN 1500K 42 PAC,, --5 CA')AND70OFM,4,05,414 RECORDS 01_Tf1E CGY/NTY ac 541V SAWFar C4L/FORN/.4. CiEOROE H /►I/M lW C•" MAY 1981 CONSUL T/NG CIVIL EN(5/NEER_ ONTAR/O, CAL /XC-D�'N/,4 LwN6INECR'S CERTIFICATE T 6E0/4GE.q 1,1/A1 MACK, HEREdY ceRTiFY THAT I AM A Re&IsrERED GIWL ENGINEER OF THC STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND THAT TH15 MAP CON51STI NG OP TWP-E. 5HECT5 15 A TRUC AND GOMPLC'TE RtPRE5CNTATI0N OF A 5URVEY MADE UNDtR MY 5L)MRV1510N IN QCT. /984 , AND THAT ALL 1416NUMENT5 SHOWN HEREON ARE OF THe CHARACTER AND OCCUPY THE rC?',ITION5 INDICATED, OR WILL Oe SST I N SUGH R�-�pI TI ON5 ON OR COMPLIANCE W I TH BECT I ON g (W,413 cj AND G449(o Or THE SUbDIVISON MAPACT AND ARE OR WILL DE SUFFICIENT TOCNADLE TIAESURVE`( TO DC RCTRACCD.�'L - DW IDD F e, 6. 81 r SIB 5 � � W, REGWS,?VR.EV tVIL . CITY eN&NEERt3 GERTIFiGATE I HtWaFY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE MAP, AND THAT THE 5U5DIV1510N SHOWN THEREON 10 SIJD'3TANTIALLY -HE SAME AS IT APPEARED ON THE TENTATIVC MAP AND ANY ArrROVED ALTCRATION5 THEREON AND THAT ALL THE rROVI5lON5 OF THE 9UCDIV1510N MAP' ACT AND T�/EC/,Tr' LC 1)Y. /✓;;t+ErS �� �.�y4s' /Ty Or"k.±NC/✓0 OATCD: by: LL GJ CNGI N CCR CITY MANNINCs COMMISSION'S CEjtTtFiGATE /N=rs�t�y !=h', �';i✓.;,',;'r SUB��.6:.:/-%N,:;47/vNON,'f✓E./ivlV S,W-5✓B.Srq/V- T/a� CC; yr"%?/►1. �, ti :: !Y/i:y , r1= 'iv/; 9T/G = , �1:IF' 4f�'i ✓I� y �� .�1, A. ">: i �, G JFINc OG 1,, ,0 C'i hM.,�•5, i 1 2� , %�_ . ;i /� JFi•�,.r� ►'C r/ � C ✓Gf%/tiE^NG.a C (i�'i.1/tY 7r : 5,4/ v .��i�/4:.�r?vi�vG sr,4lE 25 lir J.�c TM t%.;/ cw-' hikRC /i� DATED / - ' -22— ✓lJi SEC/,'Er.4rc r, r �.4n„ ✓., vGC� �%, �,/.�:5/JN SIGNATURE.` OMISSIONS THE SIGNATURE OF ISIAS W. WILLMAN, THe RECORD OWNER OF THE CASEMENT YOR POLELIN" AND INCIDENTAL PU,PPOlG`S A9 GRANTED DY IN6TRJMCNT RECORDED IN 80OK K, PAGE e25) OF DVe09 HAS LEEN OMITTtO PURSUANT TO THe PROVISIONS Or 5EGTION G443(i (C), (/) OF Tir/E IU�O/I//S/Oi✓il/APACT. /7S INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. 5AID EASEMENT CANNOT Oe i-OCATED OF RECORD THE SIGNATLIRC OF ONTARIO POWER COMPANY THE RtCAO ZD OWNER OF THt EA5EMENT FOR PGl E_INE5 AND FNCIDENTAL PJR t>5e5 A5 GRANTED Cr( IN5TRJMENT RCCORDCO APRIL I1, IW5 IN 500K 359, F*&C 3) OF DEEDS HA5 BEEN OMITt-ED PJRSUANT TO THE PROVIETION15OF 5C :TION (.i.43c, (C),(/) 4f7Jl/E SUBDIVISION MAP ACT rT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIPEN INTO A FEE. SAID EAC C-MbNT CANNOT- DE L.00ATCD OF RECORD. THE 51C4dATLJRe OP THE CJCAMONGA IN VESTMENT COMPANY AND THE CaJCAMONGA WATERCOMPANY THE RC -CORD OWNeR OF THE EASEMCNT FOR FOE LINtE AND INCIDENTAL PUPJ"09E9 A5 CPRANTCD CY INl5TRUMENT RECORDCD OCTOCCR 5, 1925 IN OOOk 804, PAGE. 280 OF DeeV5 HAS bt1=N OMITTED PURSUANT TOTHE PROVISIONS OF SM TION GG43C. (C), (1/,4'.3J OF7WF J7//0/i'm-owAzwoACT. /7JI' /.VTG.PEST4w✓wr RIPEN INTO A PEE. SAID CASC'MBNT CANNOT M LOCATCD OF KCGORD. THE S1"ATJRE OF THE .9OJTNERN CALIFORNIA sD190N COMPANY RECORD OWNER OF THE EASCM15♦4 - FOR POLU✓ L.INE5 AND INCIDENTAL PORr09C5 A5 &RANTeP 15Y IN5TRJMBNT RI5t.0RDC0 IN DODK 20&'), ^&e 153, OFFICIAL RECORDS HAS 6E.EN 0NI'nT;V PURSUW'r TO TI+E PROVISIONS OF 5CGTION Cdi404' 6�)' (/% OF THE 5U501 VISION MAP ACT. IT5 INTEREST CANNOT RIr&N INTO FCC RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL CERTIFICATE I HEREDY CERTIFY THAT THE CITY COUNGL OF THE CITY OP RANCHO CUCAMONGA, VYA MOTION DULY 5E-CONDCD AND P/USIFD, AFrROVED TNt ATT-ACHIED MAP ON THt�Q DAYOF MARCH , M&L AND ACCtrTED POR rUDLIC USE THE THEREIN OPFCRtD, ANO I ti(E.FESY .0tC'EoT ON A;5lA6.c OF T,NE' G/TY Of ZRAI.C/✓O C!/QOMON6.q TJKB 5m~ Aiw/N E.PSEMElvr' sL/f /PE✓ECT Tf✓E 411 E" 401c*41E10/C,4T/0N. Li07L�0 / y� E /T «GC cirY a- "wvcvo caO'fA4x~ (T/TLE) AUOITOR'S C6RTIFICATt I HCRCDY CERTIFY THAT ACCORDING TO THE RCGORQ50F T141S OrFIGC A43 OF THIS DATE TmeAe ARE NO LIENS AGAINST THE REAL r1E0MKTY SHOWN UrON THE ANNEXED MAP FOR UNPAID -3TKM c'0UNTY, MUNICIPAL, OR LOCAL TAXb+ OR SPECIAL A"1555MENT7 ^� LECTCD AS TAXES. OZ rT TAM* GR WWA,L AOW.;-r CNT5 NOT YET rAYAOLG, FcnMATED Tib 8C * G' va DD DATtA7 1 ERROL J. MACKZUM, COUNTY AUDITOR COUNTY OF SAN MO"RDINO, CAU FORK IA O`Y' , o�FIfTY WARD OF SUMItVI'5OR5 CeRTl1FICATI< I WFRr-DY GCQTIrY THAT A EOJO IN THC eUM Or #!< OW -0406 WI!*J CCC4nt,D ANO rILLD VAN TW, 60NIV OP 6UPCRV150R5 OP T4E. COUNTY Or SW 4XRNAKDIND, U'TATC Or G►LArORNIAI, C4NDtT10NCD umw TUC rAYMGIT OF ALL TAX156, STATE., COUNT`(, MUNICIPAL CK LWAA-, AW ALL 6119W04- A 6 %w -N%, WLL,I!CfW A& Ti1�Mi MMIC!! AT 'THE TIME. OF THE MLING OF Tife ANNCXCD MAP WITH TMC COUNTY RGGGRM ARC A Lrik A"WiT MOD FRDPGRTY, CUT NOT YET PAYAtIZ AND THAT THC O0001VIOCR HAh PILED WITH MG A CtMMMCATC Off THD F010M R OFrIGeK 6IIVINC4 1419 ESTIMATE OF THE AMOUNT OF !>AIO lXft AND A46155i8MG M, ANO TUMID- eaw ~ OJ JULY ArmoveD by SAID Damp Or LIUrCRVI 5 / I / DATE. M.4RTf/q M. SEk'ERq,I' CLE,P,� CJS T.yE Bt24RD OFSUP64✓/Sl;�s, QOTf,/E CGY/NTY G�'.Si4NBE.�PN.4,tP0/iV0 %NE 67/61V47URE L<<,45sOC/,4TE0 TELEOfrONE COMPANY OWNERS OF 4N E.4 MENt FGi4 rELEO,vOr1i� L/NES RECORDED ON JULY /7, /947 /N BGOA' 20G B, P,4GE "7 OR /TS //YTEREST (4/YrVOT R/PEN INTO 4 FEE. TWE 516/14TURE DF SxiT,w/ERN C4L 11' rIRN/,4 ED/SON CD1yP,41VY T,(/E.?ECORO 0/'t'N.6QO1_.41VEASE 1MfN7FGi4 ECECTR/C L/NES CIV MgfCf/ 6, /9(1•? INBGt2K "4.4- 10,4GE//7 O.R Lor �ryvk%✓ :�,'+r :, ::' i� F, .�l,rC/ : ,'j ,; .� T�'/EP•4EC.'SE •SES/G�t'.4,�1 �� PLgC'EME�vT DF,4LL STR!/C;T;/.PES :i/V qLL LGA `V/Ty/N TH.'S SU&771)"5/0,41 s�I,4LL BE •�/B./ECr.'G /40/?4�.'s4� pl .-- E, �. S'E. . COMMITTEE OF T,�/E Ci �Y OF R,4iVcs/D Cl/<,DM� vG,4 Bf?�Q4' r0 lyE /S.SL/,4/►�'E OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ON THIS THE 6 TH DAY OF MARCH, 1985, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID STATE, PERSONA,LY APPEARED GEORGE 0. TOWNSEND PERSONA! LY KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO., A PARTNERSHIP, SAID PARTNERSHIP BEING KNOWN TO ME TO BE ONE OF THE PARTNERS OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., A PARTNERSHIP, THE PARTNERSHIP THAT EXECUTED THE WITHIN INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME AS PARTNER OF THE PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED, THAT SAID PARTNERSHIP FIRST ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THE SAME AS A PARTNER OF RANCHO ASSOCIATES, LTD., AND THAT SAID NAMED PARTNERSHIP EXECUTED THE SAME, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. (��'rC:aetiL S ' CA""6 A. ;'A " INP G n n S,x NOTARY PUBLIC I c A 174/3 3 x35 TRACT N0. 10035 IM THE C/TY OF RAV490 Cl144MONGA, C41./FORKAR AE/N6 A fb60/1//f/OPV Of A PORT/ON OF L,OTf 7.4W.0 /., REO 11144 tL/QO/l//.f/OA/ Af I A' /1/AP ,PECAQOEO /A/ SwAo, Z/, PA6E if OF MAPS ,oww LOT m,, mwCT A/0..f046P Af /f,P MOO RE60ROf0 /.t/ ,&Mlle 4ZIPf6Ef G' �fWP 70 OFM,4PS 4LL, RECORDS Gig r,4156E C2�UrvlY OF S4/V BER/V.4/?O/VO, SlgTEO�CgL/FOR/V/.4. Fo ,,. rCS 0..�,�......_..........._.. - ........""•• GEORGE 17e SCALE : /"'-Lo' MAY, ifs/ A '• /rL0/' ,g,/•S'/,Z ENULT/NGCv/cNG iNEEPCOS GS3/��nONTAR/0, C4L/r GR/V/.46f RED ALL io COLIA, se �"w 71/1 41 • fS7.i�L/r,✓�`O Ar MW W Z Y AMW400WY L/iV'6 ,,pp : • h Of M. A ® yD �,5'EASEMENT TO 45SOG/4TEp TELEAr/ONE CO. V Q� �1 �i �^� •� FOR POLE L/NES PER L1EE0 RECQ4LiE"D /NBK n Z04d, P6.997 QR oa !1 :' L073� s�iG ��� LO•� Al 7f01% �yi T� \ er7A* f6/I,VEOA.f Me .S• EY.Y !Ar/NOA,PY OF L073• �/ 5 G/ •L6 Z�T 1b !, v 7,Y,i�T �✓O..f06f, A/.Q. <Z1-6 70 •. o� co EiOft��t11. IN F.v /I M 7iD/L /O - " f0. Z /.P. T,Q66E0 L.f.3A7Z. ,vo,r ,v«Eireo E ,tea T,f iiss,tf4fqa/Ts7�t ..,_..... 1 -3.�� mor �o� urr cfT.....,, a b 75•Z,( s!"E. 44f.19' 1zft' 7Z.QG' �/ Z695?7' I (Z70.00' 4Z/G9-76 / l/y'0 0 i"" 7.Rl6E0.7C.!/,it!",IT..-•••' 9G. �; � /Sf.7 � —; -.fQ 3.d 10.04,$!5 t7`�4 �► � po ' `� !AY et. fora Aw 7X. JV47 a '� �8• - l 3� e_ AdE 4W/4f-,V CftUj ,VI b.�� �ppl' \� j k ms' Zoo e .� � N72/029rV-� z - a aa.r�„ SVA I / �4t-Sly-` l y: o �y �a 4.150' NlrO/S2L'E w "N07'd741A � v5 / AG n` \4'ES14fro AS -W /V.4TE S S� `"` .—��" - '° \ PRrE DRe61� <ESM710 AW - O�M� rel. CO. FOR POLE Z- oRai Kpo'�ESMI.TEC. CO. G� Jf L/NES PER Z EEO Z� fo. Hi'io 7MW Ys/Ar `a \ f� `" EDR RALE L/NEe AEC: /Nat' 2148" 21 f 9q c- (� /,rr sf dK Zffl,' /16r s.►�iss v 0 N FE,P GEEO SPEC. //v�o oO6 3337 O.R. .1 /,� % AIA 41444Y. AF t•/�sii d 0 : BK. 8 337 0 r, (SEEL 7 3 �(: i �/ ..� r � a f =zas''-- �, h o l7 OR is/. •� \5' �, 1�� toa �' o S ����G ���; o to ,fib �� ,'' !'tayo''r-` o, �`0iti:i3+ 4� V 5b 9 oc \ \ 4`� �t I •S i �I A ♦i ,��3• s 1 • ,O figAso y� [ 1'D• 1'4'9 "'�_ `^.,•` `�iu mai/Q �LDINCa bCTD�G•K LINt .j _X 7 54/V D/%O /� , D ,/`•, 0 p0)�- 'Q moo- = S• czZa7t' Ga a,/1 R� Q Q� Qti $ �� is /6•;7%1" T .Vfl' 11 Mw i P A �' r L• C� � '� Q� � � •!"�• ti �.{�. L=svj' 6rsf' fzsi' t�s6.11l1 l ` ��.. �. . o r. S. 76 /s s9 w. /sawn 171? N G �• \ $ l c� eo�0 `. ��, \�i. c C% •'''O. �i?moi d=/7•o/�0" ,t•�oo' �i• �'„�ji, � :Z+ ,�r°% �., r�7o' x•17' A ,�,Z ' 1~ �z"w. Nu 5 Af •27 5" G/.lo' fG.ii' yla9 �. 9 m o IL 10 q k• � b� N V. • v wi. -fa. L r. / nom, :�►E. 7i+�s " �� 3ti \?P w ti y� o H . p 2' 41B A 1� ire.�ee/rJ .._.... h hZ \ `� •oI'f Ih ` \ �� Gir ��'►�//�tjo~p, 70L1E0/GATE 4N a►\ ,� 10 ,vim'` EASEMENT •�� � j•�4i��i. � ?r Q4 FGi4 AP4//✓•46E \t \ IlAf ~29, C5f ADl.15NM@JT NOW GN LOT 15, MW NII.L � •s'S p�•h, N � \I 1 wgavwcN NoIw ieNT Nor R'JIAJO. UOC� ���. �,�� B�•S•�• I Plx Wv N+u �Jlly+ '.1ANioDrt, µD z►RZKatO ANStc40 �ti��'�o� �C N v� ss �� •?car• MYI.AR COPY R D=OrO�J'Oo" La N•w' fo. 4e"110' i"i. Azs',Vif1ZY.................... f�P4M ¢ ,fA/ PE,P ' bCr I vz , b • a5' N w'L-�f or 4L IWCAeb, LAW FOR LIW_ ONLY Page 401 ---m 7 --ft �?Op� 0oio. per, r - p• d16'c�o• . R• O 72.40'"' ��` L• 3b.cn• . or #vp ,Z� 015 oRv Em 4 VAR/ES W/7141L0C,4r/ON Copp ,r\ °' 4',64 EME/Y! 70 '. __ ,30 FEET /N ASSOC/4TEO TEC. / , �LEN6TN > .. "fo. Z"/P. sET /N elme.. Co. ICW RALEL/NES e G " &PAWW., ACGC,PrW A5 6N/ PER OEEO REG. /N MOLD VriON Of ZYrMMr BK ea:B, R6 337Uq G/NE cr' Lflr 7, A4.6 2//33 �r�dsHJ 50 CAL. EO/SON PER //VSTRUMENT U ,*-M0RDEO 7/2//47 /NSm,r ax'q' x;G./S.3 TYR/CAL EA SENENT OEM /L /'/ ` ` O ' R S!/EE T 2 OF i fiVEETs a r• -SO. C,i'�lJi. Ci�/lO,V CD. 6p1'E frVT AW hWM22'1 WN7; AW 7 /47 IW Ar 104P, oV. A�n'. MJ O� DE;rl4/L "A" i/0 SCgL E Sc#10 : /"=60' MMES: c nv.- ,ems Amma of msT.os svpw,v FOR me S'LY f&wWAffY L/MC OF 7, Wr NO. 47-17, M.B. BS/S03/ AVIW L/IEO Af Me AfWlf OF SE•O�P/A/6f "ViC Ti�//,S' "IV. Z. • MONL1,veV7X f0!/NOAf NOMP. j, o /w0/,-,47rS /"l P. ApGE. 9399, zwzeof 407AC,9fW1!re MPMW SMS ,CeVXr M" AMAWWR AYAC77W EN61MMeN6 4V,0!/4JWh'$, OAr,-,V A1116df7 Z7, /SBO, AY APl/lE A PA4Z"R , Xe7e.. /"P/. f Tl//S M.Wr AW 38 ZOrf, AMO /5.725 AZ.lLS 4. vile. /ND/C,gTES Az/At/C' UT/L/TY 6wFAfEMT. 7 C.S.M. /NO/C.VMf eWIV7Y f!/WWYOAS' /A;.NZ1A0'4 VT.- 7 CSAA f /NO/447Ef OO!/NTY tel"4EYO, 5r f/ELO A40W. 9 jz AYD/,ATEs /" /.P. SET //4"EELO/(/ Sd,PFrQIE, N//TJi/ T/ES, 7WS6Eo ,fee 9399. ' /D. x /MO/44TES G "Aafr SET /'W /. M. AMO /VAr"of, W17w r/", T,v"Eo 'rc. E. 93 Qp /,✓o/Cwre!5 1"/. P .sET lfLl/fiVJ *Wp 9399. /t. ( ) A. -MRO AW70 (Ag NOM -D) /3. CC.`!/O. /ND/C4rES C444HaV64 COUNTY WAr_-R O/STV/Cr 74?/3 -er / 0 W h TRACT NO,, 10035 #1 rMs C/TY w /sAaIWO �Y/C�QMON6A, CAL IFMM1,A ro.1'c.s.M. � "IM46 RI .f!/t6%I//.S'/ON OF .4 ,q 710A/ OF LOTS 7 AMP /j, .PED 1//LL SU60////S/O,t/ c•tflb' 273/5-7'' �Rf �,! AIAP �Es�O/POEO /N A00,� I/, R�6E j3 Of A4RlPS, .4N0 LOT /O, T,i�R7CT 1► OOUNTRY 4LU6 AP JW6-v AT /E.q MAR-AFMROEO /N 804,(' ¢Z, P�OGES `9 .giVO 70, 0,rAMPS � p N y L �o� ��VE o .ALL AMOR405 Qr TMf C4V1W7Y 04CS4N �E.P/1�4/�O/NO, STAlE A�C,DL /PORN/•4 . R / � � «, GEORGE NA04fAMC/�— GLvT4R/Q CWZ1,r RN/.4 ,S�G NSA G5 G \ 39 s op y2 CAPER. f �0 •� � s z►I , . �' � E N FOR rtD � pls�����. � E�Ev\;•. , `°�', EASE \ .30'�pdsf��� Pd ld1Ey �� �E��Str/ JI �. ' , 8 • � ,1 t0 / F 00 00 � 0 A11.1 E4�EMEN/ rc.= `y 1. rkk too E 4 OI I; Jo rr�.aEs �s�c 1 �, �Q� •g, fE 4 d• ; 2�' �' Z a ti. JLr4/L J \ 0w o\�p1�331 py`� , r�� 5•x'1 4 , ` p RFr 2? /` r �r e (,'EASEMENT f0_� j 50&,rivE9N \ Ate` d'bl s A0 A"Z-A4Vf,, N07AW � �y1R �A �9 moi. � � M1j .004E L NO 10661., $9' 9G- 28 `? �/ 5, 1174, \ °b �► fo. /"ilr 7,4�Eo'v.s2srf" �i uc�w iorav - I. �._, &0v¢s'/iz3'E p��s'000za'r" NO 10666, A�C'CE/TE/ 1016106., ) 31 Z/.57 n, �O '40 t�• Iia Pf [07s f f i t �` -� ,'�' 31' PR/d4TE .i- �s� , ' �. o .10 .a, oma► /YI/SN) ,�• h 1 1 4'� M* s3. d o R:SZ.< r,. �'[ ¢ag�' �\ 0RR,4lV,46E 0 !�''� j9" k0� �d `b`�s_ a.�Z t7 •.¢�' a ESMT qo. mow.• \b \ ✓%p ,\ IV. a.); t .• �-14 f0 71 S 5 4 \ 1 .o<'ESMr7045SOC/,4TED yfo p A55 I 7EL. Coo. FOR GE L/NES Ittµ, t/�10 '�v 5�1• �E� ��p�R �j /B v ;� \,� \ ` r • PER DEED RE IN A6J'r Z V /N b p 5 gK Seg• �, \ • 2C1:B,R5 937 GZR\� IAlEE SIN SND Rsa.r/'. p R 33 P6. w j 9. �u✓,) . I j /s s o W OC .x°09° �� s �r•yco"w. /vz:c' Q0 / o �4 H pQ tir.�3 ^ gtl.l�Q /Q W. '� \ i b h bu1L(71Wx •� L * itlS� ''[ V �4 =//5' Z4f °ttj 7"- Z/. f1 ti 15' �L �Z. dS' \ .\ �� r e=/•rlsa•' LINE ; I �1 r=risz' 0 w � [ • tx �e • ZI;., ♦oso' L=iao�' i L =rte sG' T=/s...n' �O dz'_/ ? o \ 4.1.�•S?• C • %. ' Rs/i!O' L � /6 •/!/.K' T•!f�/' S.GZ•/7l9"AV /G/.f0 L ZISL' Q /9zG` !S6' �dL 27.70' D S-il•/7'If"M! 4 {S fZ �„ 4B� Mv�d \ 4\ / vL °_ •sry " M !� r. ��o`;, ssz•�7>:s"w. r-ssoi' _ soG.so \ � � f 3i'15 ti•(!� _ S `Z•/7' ..� �?tp s. � � \� /.Yid �- � +� r•y` ` w R = L f /isso' _7-1- 740' -AA9 L ZOB.36'zz ' ,p�/100 d.f1•/7:/ N! Z77. � "i _ _ _ o d°a<'�l•,�•�5.lL�'i5�_ ,/`• i(://10' L•/I//f'fsz•/7'1Z.,�, L•ii' \ 7,/ /Itdl�?7l.ZO' S7.ss' d=d �� /��•' R+tee'}" �� ' xter�K u,''r //2.LG' . Q ft / d r I.55'Is' GI.IZ' z N dL' B2. iG' • L • to./1' n IRS' [ = r \ z N •� Ni L:77a ---� • yam` ��� %% o ' 4r I � � t• o _ a. O -� `" ►. � H h .�. stir,, '�'+ L s S•jl 1 3a ' �Q 1,^ qlV �h Qb H •OLS 0� \ell �•`�3`�- V r/�L=Z/3.ie. f•IZ I tl�1 •�,�4Za �9/41 /7 d•tt•SGWl'It �o6oj Ilk do 17 0 1/ 0 41 V • V RrZIOft LrIy9 Zr aOOf, e=/•/Zs�" 3'N L=�R75' L=Gw.!/' ___ /. G.6f BOA/' BQO/' 5100' Ef.On' 1' /.iZGi7' " ,Ili Vi � W 4141 •/9'/3"E. aro t700 .frl7S'99_75_—tom -—�,4*D'o900".Q=// Y9./'' ••••&5-meL/lNEO As 7wdr A!N/'LY [/NE OF AA17,11"N AVezos/G /fV/Z~,p /fMA17" Of L = ZXf,I' 7, /x.76 b ' b 1 � Il�2864.�3' t -'x61.51' �Q: � �� I� 1. A217.451 M/ T ' /�•JZ' fW1Z,FWP QldWr 4f. Ip/ A•O'27'G0' YJR 4' h � -co,�' ; t", i 1010 - N. �/ •/9'/d ' E. G,eb .4/ " - �� cc, L4 R104/LS AW -S'. ArIW AV X/99 649LE : /~=GO MYLAR COPY Page 402 SHEET -5 OF S SHMT5 Ile oil PR/VATE DRQ/NAGE EASEMENT �� w � l 27 26 ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/ SO -S/ \F� o41q,,, I✓ S. T /6106 1X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER S&r \�ti If 20.00 \\ SZGS, E6. //7 O.R. OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .ew sLY Co,P. fV,4 2� \f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1bo35 ` l EASEMENT TO C/1YOF,4,4N1ND C&C4WON6.4 AW STORNOR..4/N ZIET4/L 5,raRN ORWA/ EASEMENT SCALE•' /1FI40 f0. it T. Def r,P. 4777 S/ SO -S/ \F� o41q,,, I✓ S. T /6106 1X 46"76 'EASEME/VT TO S.C.E. CO. M. a es/so;�/ FQR POLE L/NES PER S&r \�ti If 20.00 \\ SZGS, E6. //7 O.R. OF,Q4NC/,/O COC41VO14164 FLA? D` 10", /\1z1 `\ \ G6T4/CON ROPE/4Ty 9 / 40' ,o ��,e�°\ \ LOT 5, RED HILI_ Tom\ \ / SUBDIVISION, M.B. 21/33 ..- 4sw AMP .............FO. /yi"/.R 7A66E0 "L.SIISZ" 4-y ACCEPTED .ew sLY Co,P. fV,4 2� \f.Q' T� G 717, M.S. /S/ f0-fY A90 O 1bo35 DATE: December 11, 2019 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF DENIAL FOR HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244 AND MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 — PAUL BARDOS - Site plan and architectural review of a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 771 square foot garage and a request to construct retaining walls up to 5 -feet and 2 -inches high on a 15,430 square foot lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 through the adoption of the attached resolutions of denial. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND: Hillside Development Review DRC2018-00473 and minor exception on DRC2018-00473 was reviewed by the Planning Commission at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting. At that meeting, staff presented an overview of the project, the applicant responded to staff comments and the public was provided time to comment on the project. The Planning Commission closed said meeting, deliberated and voted 5-0 to have staff draft resolution of denial for the subject entitlements for their action at the next Planning Commission meeting. ANALYSIS: A detailed description and analysis of the project has been provided in the Staff Report that was presented to Planning Commission on November 13, 2019. Page 490 RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244 - A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 4,118 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted this Resolution denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is herebyfound, determined, and resolved bythe Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on December 11, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot, two-story single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 494 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District Page 494 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 2 South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District C. While the proposed project generally conforms to the minimum development requirements of the Hillside Design Standards, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. As a result, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The Planning Commission finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family Page 488 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 3 homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the Planning Commission recognizes the comments received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. Such comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. The Planning Commission finds that the increasing growth in average house size, including the proposed project, correlates to the neighborhood concerns about maintaining the neighborhood's character and its negative impact on development that contributes positively to the neighborhood. 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Commission herebyfinds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Policy LU -2.4. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The proposed residence is not complementary to the surrounding development as it is significantly larger than the other residences in Tract 10035. At 4,889 square feet include living and garage area, it is 977 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 (3,912 square feet) and provides side yard setbacks that are not compatible with the Hillside Development Ordinance. b. The proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objectives of Section 17.122.020 (Hillside Development) of the Development Code which states that the hillside design standards and guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The proposed single-family residence is incompatible with the other single-family residences as it significantly larger (977 square feet) than the existing and approved residences in Tract 10035 and is proposed at the minimum side yard setbacks (5 and 10 feet) in conflict Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. In addition, the project does not conform to the maximum height restriction for retaining walls in the Hillside Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. In this case, the project proposes retaining walls of up to five feet, two inches in height. By separate resolution, the Planning Commission has denied a proposed minor exception to permit the additional retaining wall height above the height limit permitting by the Development Code. Accordingly, the project does not comply with the retaining wall height limit in the Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is not in accord with the Development Code as the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District which was intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project proposes to construct a single-family residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, in conflict with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the Page 480 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-75 HDR DRC2017-00244— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 4 vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, and all of the evidence in the record, this Commission hereby denies Hillside Development Review DRC2017-00244 and the project proposed by the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF December 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA An ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2019, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 4941 RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473 - A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT RETAINING WALLS UP TO 5 -FEET AND 2 -INCHES HIGH FOR A 4,118 SQUARE FOOT, TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 771 SQUARE FOOT GARAGE ON A 15,430 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE LOW (L) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AND WITHIN THE HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT AT 8035 CAMINO PREDERA; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2018-00473, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted this Resolution denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on December 11, 2019, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot, three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height within the Hillside Overlay Zone, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. C. The application is for a Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the project's proposed retaining walls to be over the 4 foot maximum height limit (five feet, two inches proposed). The project site is within the Hillside Overlay Zone. Page 490 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 2 d. The Planning Commission makes the following findings in support of its decision to deny the application: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the Planning Commission finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. As a result, the Planning Commission finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. General Plan Compatibility: The Planning Commission finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the Planning Commission recognizes the comments received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. Such comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. The Planning Commission finds that the increasing growth in average house size, including the proposed project, correlates to the neighborhood concerns about maintaining the Page 480 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 3 neighborhood's character and its negative impact on development that contributes positivelyto the neighborhood. 3. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or Development Agreement. The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related design review (DRC2017-00244) is fora 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). The proposed building size along with the proposed building setbacks creates the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. b. The proposed development is not compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. For the reasons stated above, the proposed single-family residence is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot and increasing the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is not necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The necessity for retaining walls above the height limit can be mitigated by reducing the size of the proposed residence and by increasing the side yard setbacks. d. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, and all of the evidence in the record, this Commission hereby denies Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 and the project proposed by the application. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 490 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 19-76 HDR DRC2018-00473— BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. DECEMBER 11, 2019 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 11TH DAY OF December 2019. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1W ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 11th day of December 2019, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 441 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.75 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On December 19, 2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on February 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot, two-story single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 442 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 2 C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." At the November 13, 2019, Page 482 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." At the November 13, 2019, Page 482 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 3 Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which encourages complementary infill development. The proposed residence is not complementary to the surrounding development as it is significantly largerthan the other residences in Tract 10035. At 4,889 square feet include living and garage area, it is 977 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 (3,912 square feet) and provides side yard setbacks that are not compatible with the Hillside Development Ordinance which encourages increase setback to avoid the appearance of overbuilding and crowding of structures b. The proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objectives of Section 17.122.020 (Hillside Development) of the Development Code which states that the hillside design standards and guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The proposed single-family residence is incompatible with the other single-family residences as it significantly larger (977 square feet) than the existing and approved residences in Tract 10035 and is proposed at the minimum side yard setbacks (5 and 10 feet) in conflict Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. In addition, the project does not conform to the maximum height restriction for retaining walls in the Hillside Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. In this case, the project proposes retaining walls of up to five feet, two inches in height. By separate resolution, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision to deny the proposed minor exception to permit the additional Page 469 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 4 retaining wall height above the height limit permitting by the Development Code. Accordingly, the project does not comply with the retaining wall height limit in the Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is not in accord with the Development Code as the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District which was intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project proposes to construct a single-family residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, in conflict with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975, and upholds the Planning Commission's decision denying Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of February 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Page 4611 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. February 19, 2020 Page 5 ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 4110 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2018-00473, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11 th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.76 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On December 19-2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on February 19, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot, three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and b. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height within the Hillside Overlay Zone, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. Page 489 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 2 C. The application is for a Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the project's proposed retaining walls to be over the 4 -foot maximum height limit (five feet, two inches proposed). The project site is within the Hillside Overlay Zone. d. The City Council makes the following findings in support of its decision to deny the application: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission, at the November 131" Planning Commission meeting, expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape therefore establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed Page 468 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 3 above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the City Council recognizes the comments have been received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all available evidence presented to this City Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related design review (DRC2017-00244) is for a 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). The proposed building size along with the proposed building setbacks creates the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. b. The proposed development is not compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. For the reasons stated above, the proposed single-family residence is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot and increasing the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is not necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The necessity for retaining walls above the height limit can be mitigated by reducing the size of the proposed residence and by increasing the side yard setbacks. d. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the Page 438 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. FEBRUARY 19, 2020 Page 4 requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975 and upholds the Planning Commission decision to deny Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 19th day of February, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 4811 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2017-00244; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Hillside Development Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.75 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On the 19th day of December 2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal and continued said hearing to the 18th day of March 2020. 6. On the 18th day of March 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. The City Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on March 18, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot, two-story single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and Page 460 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 2 b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations forthe project site and adjacent properties are as follows: C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section Page 462 Land Use General Plan Zoning Low (L) Residential District Site Vacant Land Low Residential Hillside Overlay District North Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District South Pacific Electric Trail Public Mixed -Use (MU) District East Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District West Existing Single -Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Hillside Overlay District C. The proposed project does not conform to the minimum development requirements of the Development Code and Hillside Design Standards because it does not conform to the retaining wall height limit applicable to the project. Concurrent with this Resolution, the City Council is also adopting a Resolution to uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny a minor exception for retaining wall height. The City Council also finds that the project is not in character with the surrounding neighborhood and existing residences along Camino Predera for the following reasons: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section Page 462 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 3 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." At the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, the Planning Commission expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape, therefore, establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which encourages complementary infill development. The proposed residence is not complementary to the surrounding development as it is significantly largerthan the other residences in Tract 10035. At 4,889 square feet include living and garage area, it is 977 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 (3,912 square feet) and provides side yard setbacks that are not compatible with the Hillside Development Ordinance which encourages increase setback to avoid the appearance of overbuilding and crowding of structures b. The proposed use is not in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project is not in accord with the objectives of Section 17.122.020 (Hillside Development) of the Development Code which states that the hillside design standards and guidelines are intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The proposed single-family residence is incompatible with the other single-family residences as it significantly larger (977 square feet) than the existing and approved residences in Tract 10035 and is proposed at the minimum side yard setbacks (5 and 10 feet) in conflict Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures. In addition, the project does not conform to the maximum height restriction for retaining walls in the Hillside Overlay Zone. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. In this case, the project proposes Page 460 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 4 retaining walls of up to five feet, two inches in height. By separate resolution, the City Council upheld the Planning Commission's decision to deny the proposed minor exception to permit the additional retaining wall height above the height limit permitting by the Development Code. Accordingly, the project does not comply with the retaining wall height limit in the Development Code. C. The proposed use is not in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project is not in accord with the Development Code as the project site is located within the Hillside Overlay District which was intended to facilitate the appropriate development of hillside areas. The project proposes to construct a single-family residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet, in conflict with the intent of Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2.a, which explicitly encourages increased setbacks to avoid overbuilding and crowding of structures, etc. The existing residence to the west is also constructed at the minimum side yard setback, increasing the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975 and upholds the Planning Commission's decision denying Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of March 2020, by the following vote: Page 464 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF DR DRC2017-00244 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 5 AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 468 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING APPEAL DRC2019-00975 AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION TO DENY MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2018-00473; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0207-631-03. A. Recitals. 1. Bardos Construction, Inc., filed an application for the approval of Minor Exception DRC2018-00473, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 13th day of November 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution of denial to formally adopt the action. 3. On the 11 th day of December 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 19.76 denying the application and making findings in support of its decision. 4. On the 19th day of December 2019, the applicant, Bardos Construction, Inc., filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application. 5. On the 19th day of February 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal and continued said hearing to the 18th day of March 2020. 6. On the 18th day of March 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the appeal, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to deny the application and making findings in support thereof. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on March 18, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, the City Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 4,118 square foot two-story, single-family residence along with an attached 771 square foot, three -car garage on the 15,430 square foot project site (the "project"); and Page 466 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 2 b. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.122.020.C.1.g., retaining walls may not exceed four feet in height within the Hillside Overlay Zone, although within the minimum required street front setback, individual retaining walls shall not exceed three feet in height. C. The application is for a Minor Exception (DRC2018-00473) to permit the project's proposed retaining walls to be over the 4 -foot maximum height limit (five feet, two inches proposed). The project site is within the Hillside Overlay Zone. d. The City Council makes the following findings in support of its decision to deny the application: Building Size/Massing: Tract 10035, which includes the project site, was approved by the Rancho Cucamonga City Council in March 1985 and comprises a total of 38 lots. Twenty-one of the lots are currently developed with single-family homes. Based on staff's review of available building permit data, which measures the cumulative building square footage of all development, including garages, patios, and porches, as well as information provided by the Property Information Management System hosted by the San Bernardino County Assessor's Office and square footage data for other projects recently approved within the tract, the average size for residences in the tract is 3,912 square feet, and the average size of residences along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 3,918 square feet. The size of the proposed project's living and garage area alone is 4,889 square feet. Notably, when including porches and decks (374 square feet proposed), to be consistent with the methodology used in reviewing building permit data, the proposed project's size increases to 5,263 square feet. This means that the project is approximately 1,351 square feet larger than the average residence in Tract 10035 and 1,345 square feet larger than the average residence on the south side of Camino Predera. For the foregoing reasons, the City Council finds that the project's size is substantially larger than the predominant home size within the neighborhood and street and is therefore not consistent with the neighborhood's character. In addition, the City Council finds that the project's massing could be mitigated by increasing the front setback, thus reducing the overall height of the structure as seen from Camino Predera and/or by modifying the roof design to reduce the height of the roof peak. 2. Building Width/Setbacks: The project proposes to construct the proposed residence at the minimum side yard setbacks of 5 and 10 feet (Development Code Table 17.36.010-1). Section 17.122.020.D.2.a of the Municipal Code provides that the "design of the structure shall give consideration to the lot's size and configuration in order to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize the blocking of views." The Planning Commission, at the November 131" Planning Commission meeting, expressed concerns that the proposed project as well as the neighboring existing residence, both having been built to the minimum setbacks, would result in the appearance of overbuilding along the Camino Predera streetscape, therefore, establishing an adverse precedent. The City Council has independently reviewed the record and concurs with the Planning Commission's findings and concerns. As a result, the City Council finds that the project is not consistent with the goals and guidelines of the City's Hillside Development Ordinance. 3. General Plan Compatibility: The City Council finds that the project as proposed is also not compatible with General Plan Policy LU -2.4, which aims to "promote complementary infill Page 469 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 3 development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contributes positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas." The proposed project does not meet the qualitative intent of General Plan Policy LU -2.4 which aims to promote development which contributes "positively" to the surrounding residential neighborhood. This is based on the following factors: (1) as discussed above, the project is out of character with the size and massing of the existing single-family homes in the neighborhood; and (2) the project's side yard setbacks contribute to the appearance of overcrowding and overbuilding on the south side of Camino Predera. In addition, the City Council recognizes the comments have been received from neighborhood residents that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's small single-family homes. The Planning Commission, at the November 13, 2019, Planning Commission meeting, received public comments that the scale of development within the tract and along the south side of Camino Predera is not in character with the neighborhood's smaller single-family homes. Similar comments were received from neighborhood residents at the Neighborhood Meeting on June 10, 2019, as well as comments received at the Design Review Committee meeting on October 22, 2019. 3. Based upon all available evidence presented to this City Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is not consistent with the General Plan. The proposed Minor Exception to permit additional retaining wall height is not consistent with the General Plan. The General Plan encourages complementary infill development (General Plan Policy LU -2.4). The related design review (DRC2017-00244) is for a 4,118 square foot single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average house size within Tract 10035 (based on the existing and approved residences within the Tract 10035). The proposed building size along with the proposed building setbacks creates the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. b. The proposed development is not compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. For the reasons stated above, the proposed single-family residence is not compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is significantly larger than the other residences in the same tract (Tract 10035) and is proposed to be constructed at the minimum side yard setbacks, creating the appearance of overbuilding the lot and increasing the necessity for retaining walls over the maximum height limit. C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is not necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The necessity for retaining walls above the height limit can be mitigated by reducing the size of the proposed residence and by increasing the side yard setbacks. d. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The granting of the minor exception will constitute a grant of special privilege as the additional retaining wall height is related to a proposed single-family residence which is not complementary to the surrounding neighborhood as it is significantly larger than the average size residence within Tract 10035 and is constructed to the minimum setbacks. The City has been contacted by property owners in the surrounding neighborhood who are opposed to the project based Page 4613 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 4 on the size of the proposed residence, the height of the residence above curb face on Camino Predera and the width of the project (built at minimum setbacks). 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. The City Council has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2019-00975 and upholds the Planning Commission decision to deny Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. 6. This Council hereby provides notice to the appellants that the time within which judicial review of the decision represented by this Resolution must be sought is governed by the provisions of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 7. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified mail, return -receipt requested, to Mr. Paul Bardos, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga at a regular meeting held on the 18th day of March 2020, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dated: JANICE C. REYNOLDS, City Clerk Page 468 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20-XX DRC2019-00975 A CC APPEAL OF ME DRC2018-00473 — BARDOS CONSTRUCTION, INC. March 18, 2020 Page 5 Page 450 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF AN APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM, APPLICANT. THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF A SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE; APN: 0229-171-02. THIS ITEM IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) AND THE CITY'S CEQA GUIDELINES UNDER CEQA SECTION 15332 — INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission decision to approve Design Review DRC2019-00590. BACKGROUND: On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2019-00590 for the construction of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building. Prior to that meeting, correspondence was received from Lozeau Drury, LLP, raising concerns related to staff's determination that the project was categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Planning Commission reviewed the correspondence from Lozeau Drury, LLP, and determined, after guidance from Council, that the staff's CEQA determination was defensible and approved the project. On February 20, 2020, an appeal of the Planning Commission approval of received from Lozeau Drury, LLP, within the 10 -day appeal period. ANALYSIS: The basis of the appellant's appeal is that the Project does not qualify for CEQA's Class 32 categorical exemption and, therefore, additional environmental review is required before the Project may be approved. A project that qualifies for a categorical exemption has been determined to be of a type that does not cause a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of CEQA. The Class 32 categorical exemption is listed at CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 and applies to "in -fill" development. It reads as follows: Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions described in this section. Page 438 (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. City staff determined that Project satisfied these five elements and is categorically exempt from CEQA pursuant to the Class 32 exemption. At the public hearing held before the Planning Commission on February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission concurred with staff's determination that the Project is exempt from CEQA. The appellant asserts that the Class 32 categorical exemption is inapplicable here because the Project (1) has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species; and (2) the project would result in significant air quality, greenhouse gas, and other impacts, although the applicant does not specify what those other impacts might be. CEQA' categorical exemptions are subject to six exceptions listed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2. If one of these exceptions applies, then the categorical exemption is inapplicable to the project and further environmental review would be required. The appellant argues that the following two exceptions disqualify the Project from relying on the Class 32 categorical exemption: (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Staff has reviewed the information provided by the appellant in support of its CEQA arguments. For the reasons explained below, finds that the appeal lacks merit and should be denied. In addition, the applicant's environmental consultant, Recon Environmental, reviewed the appellant's letter and has prepared an analysis that supports the City's reliance on the Class 32 exemption. Staff has independently reviewed the applicant's supporting evidence and finds that it supports the City's determination that the Project is exempt from CEQA. Staff's response to each of the appellant's claims follows. Applicability of Class 32 Exemption In the Planning Commission Staff Report, staff provided its justification for using the Class 32 exemption for the Project, along with supporting evidence. Specifically, staff made the following findings for each of the exemption's elements: The Project is a permitted use and complies with the development standards for the Industrial Park (IP) General Plan land use designation and zoning district, where the Project site is located. This includes compatibility with the setback, height, lot coverage, and other design standards. No variance was required for this Project. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The Project occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The site is 4.77 acres in size, and thus lower than the five -acre threshold. Furthermore, the surrounding properties are all fully developed with urban uses, including residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest, and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties. Page 439 Thus, the Project site is surrounded by urban uses on all sides. The Project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. Staff reviewed a Project -specific Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) prepared by WRA in August 2019. Based on that report, it was determined that the Project site does not include any natural habitats or other features, such as drainage, ponded areas, wetlands, or riparian that would be subject to regulation as suitable habitat. The site is currently being used as a truck storage and maintenance facility. Furthermore, the Project site is surrounded by existing development. The project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. To support this finding, the City caused to be prepared the following technical studies and plans: (1) a Trip Generation Analysis from the Ganddini Group dated August 8, 2019; (2) a Noise Impact Analysis prepared by Recon dated August 16, 2019; (3) an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Recon dated August 21, 2019; and (4) a Water Quality Control exhibit prepared by CA Engineering, Inc., dated November 5, 2019. Staff independently reviewed all of these technical studies and plans. Based on all evidence in the record, staff determined that the Project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. For the foregoing reasons, staff determined that the Project satisfied all of the elements for the Class 32 exemption. The memorandum prepared by Recon Consultants provides further justification for this determination. In addition, Recon's memorandum specifically responds to the appellant's technical claims that the Project would cause significant air quality impacts due to diesel particulate matter and greenhouse gas emissions. Contrary to the appellant's assertion, the City's factual determinations that the Project meets all of these elements is subject to review under the deferential "substantial evidence" test. Thus, the determination should be upheld so long as it is supported by substantial evidence in the record. Staff believes there is substantial evidence in the record to support its determinations. Unusual Circumstances The appellant asserts that the Class 32 exemption is inapplicable because a categorical exemption may not be "used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances." (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2(c)). For the reasons stated above, staff believes that the Project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Staff further believes that there are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project that could cause a significant environmental effect. The Project site is currently occupied by an industrial use on land designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan and the City's Zoning Map. The current use is a storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm, and the site contains multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. Thus, there is little change in the nature of the current facility and the Project being frequented by trucks. Furthermore, the Project is similar in nature and size to the surrounding industrial uses and warehouses. The surrounding industrial uses include: • South Bay International, located at 8750 Hickory Avenue, consists of a 9.5 -acre, 215,748 -square - foot warehouse. • Acra Machinery, located at 13173 Arrow Route, consists of a 1.93 -acre, 38,856 -square -foot warehouse. • Heartland Express, located at 8566 Pecan Avenue, consists of a 4.83 -acre, 16,710 -square -foot truck terminal. • K -Vac Environmental Emergency Services, located at 8615 Pecan Avenue, consists of a 4.75 - acre warehouse/storage facility. Page 440 • DiCarlo Productions Recording Studio, located at 8657 Pecan Avenue, consists of 1.34 acres, 18,294 square feet of light industrial uses. The Project's proposed warehouse is 103,945 square feet in total size, on a parcel 4.77 -acre parcel. Thus, the Project site and the proposed warehouse are roughly the same size as similar industrial uses in the vicinity. While there may be residential uses nearby, there is nothing unusual with an industrial warehouse replacing an existing industrial use with scattered offices and equipment on site. Indeed, the enclosed warehouses may improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood and reduce on-site noise. As a result, there are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project that preclude reliance on the Class 32 exemption. Cumulative Impacts The appellant states that the Class 32 exemption is inapplicable to the Project because "the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant." (CEQA Guidelines § 15300.2(b)). The appellant specifically sites cumulative air quality impacts related to construction equipment and emissions generated from diesel trucks and other vehicles associated with the Project. Staff believes that there is no cumulative impact associated with air quality. Staff believes that air quality impacts will remain the same, if not improve, due to the fact that industrial facilities already exist in the immediate area. As a baseline matter, the Project would replace an existing storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm. The Project's Trip Generation Analysis prepared by the Ganddini Group concluded that the existing trucking facility actually generates more traffic than the Project is expected to generate. Therefore, a reduction in vehicle criteria pollutant emissions below what is currently generated should be expected. Furthermore, the Project would be constructed in accordance with the 2019 Energy Code. For non-residential buildings, it is estimated that the 2019 standards will decrease energy consumption by 30 percent compared to the previous 2016 Energy Code. This should help reduce pollutant emissions below the current baseline and avoid any cumulative air quality impact. With respect to construction, staff expects varied locations and schedules for construction of other projects in the City. Therefore, it is unlikely construction activities would overlap, thereby avoiding significant cumulative construction air quality impacts on sensitive receptors. Finally, the Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Recon determined that the Project would not cause a significant air quality impact associated with construction equipment, diesel trucks, and other vehicles associated with the Project. The thresholds utilized in this analysis were developed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These thresholds are used to determine whether a Project contributes to a significant cumulative impact because they review projects on a basin -wide level. Given that no significant air quality impact was found, staff believes that the Class 32 exemption is still appropriate. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - 2/12/20 PC Staff Report With Exhibits Attachment 2 - 2/12/20 PC Resolution of Approval Attachment 3 - CC Appeal Letter Attachment 4 - Applicant Appeal Response Memo Attachment 5 - City Council Resolution Page 441 STAFF REPORT DATE: February 12, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review DRC2019-00590 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage and maintenance yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 442 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Parcel General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District North Industrial Building, Single -Family General Industrial General Industrial (GI) Residences District South Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District Page 442 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 2 East Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial (GI) Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet District West Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) Building Setback Rear 0 Feet 135 Feet District ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes developing a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building that includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area and 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor and an additional 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. The front, or primary, elevation of the building will be oriented towards Pecan Avenue, with the office area located at the southwest corner of the building. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction, with each facade painted a palette of five colors. Metal cladding and extensive glazing will accent the office area with a sandblast finish and high windows accenting the other elevations. Building pop -outs are proposed on the north and south elevations to provide wall plane articulation and visual interest. The required 500 square foot employee outdoor eating area will be located along the south property line and will include a metal lattice shade cover, multiple dining tables, and a trash receptacle. The loading area, dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building and will be screened from public view by the building. The site will be accessed by two driveways, one located adjacent to the north property line and one located to the south property line, with vehicle parking located along the west and south elevations of the building. Eight -foot -high block walls along with view obscuring wrought iron gates will screen the majority of the parking area from public view. An 8 -foot high wrought iron fence is proposed along the south property line, which is shared with truck storage lot to the south. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, parking, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown in the following tables: B. Parking: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 32 vehicle parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Page 443 Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback Side 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback Rear 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes X35 Feet at Minimum Setback (With 1 Foot Additional Height Allowed for Each 1 Foot of Increased Setback B. Parking: Per Table 17.64.050-1 of the Development Code, the parking requirement is based on the proposed mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 32 vehicle parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Page 443 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 3 C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on December 17, 2019 (Exhibit B). The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. D. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on December 4, 2019. No residents attended the meeting. E. Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $103,945 or pay an in -lieu fee to the City's public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are General Industrial and General Industrial (GI) District, respectively, which permits the development and operation of a warehouse/distribution building of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project, respectively, qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: Page 444 Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Office Parking 8,000 SF 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces Warehouse Parking Ware se Ware 1:1,000 for 1St 20,000 SF 5 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking 10 Dock High Doors 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces C. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on December 17, 2019 (Exhibit B). The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. D. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on December 4, 2019. No residents attended the meeting. E. Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $103,945 or pay an in -lieu fee to the City's public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy. F. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning designation for the project site are General Industrial and General Industrial (GI) District, respectively, which permits the development and operation of a warehouse/distribution building of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project, respectively, qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: Page 444 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 4 a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Ganddini Group; August 8, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The project site is presently being used by a truck repair and storage operation which generates an estimated 242 daily vehicle trips. The proposed warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 237 daily trips or a 5 -trip reduction from current conditions. Based on the reduction in daily trips, it was determined that the project was below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Recon; August 16, 2019) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds and no mitigation measures were necessary. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Recon; August 21, 2019) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (CA Engineering, Inc.; November 5, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (WRA; August 2019) was prepared for the project site. The project site does not include any natural habitats and is surrounded by development. The BRA determined that the project site does not contain drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands or riparian habitats that would be under the jurisdiction of federal, state or local agencies. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The BRA does recommend a nesting bird survey prior to grading if vegetation removal takes place during the bird nesting period (February 1 to August 31). FISCAL IMPACT: A Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates; August 23, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the project would provide a net annual recurring surplus of $33,555 to the City. The project site is also assessed an annual property tax of which a percentage is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. Page 445 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 5 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While no specific City Council goals are addressed, General Plan Policy LU -3.7 encourages new development projects to be built on vacant in -fill sites within a built -out area. The vacant project site is within the General Industrial (GI) District and is surrounded by existing industrial development. The proposed warehouse distribution building will enhance our Premier Community Status by providing a well-designed warehouse building that is complementary to the surrounding land uses and will provide additional employment opportunities for our residents and the region. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660 -foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Plan Set Exhibit B - Color Rendering Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments (December 17, 2019) and Action Agenda Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2019-00590 Page 446 NIVAh Ol 11VM X10018 JNUSIX3 C� Q (/� N o o I I I I I I Z Z OW OW o. o. Lf7 m 0 6) Co m J J J J J I O O 0 O O Cn .996WC 0, J I` CD O CO 't c') Q Q Q Q Q Q f` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > 0 00'0££ 3„OO,�Oo00N � o � � � � � � � N � N � � � � o llt/M�i0018JNIlSIX3 O o co N o ti � � - - - - _ _ 11yM 110018 JNUSIX3 z C/) O O C) LO z a' o J z F7 °O co CO ¢c) - V,- O O I U w R�: O N wL/ I ' XL/ I L^, XL/ IL/ I ' XL/ I ' I Z z N N N O O N , i 10g IV V i ,0 ”' IV V i IOJ "' IV V I 109 IV V I 109 "• IV N I , C/) O~ w c m Q , w w ('� L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ ' ' I U LuO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J ' I z� --- I I I I - L.L. a� ■ I C/) p U' ■ \ C=) z 0 CD'-:mL�D 110 IL I' 'I10 1 ' lV.l'� 13.30TM: ; d'1 o C"ifig= o cn !s� N Li c j LLJ w C/) O OW z ■ CD 0 LL C/) O aw) � OCD CD - - - -�S \-- -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- \\- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- L -Li Q W O o ~ CD Q Z LU LU LU Q O' - - -- -- -- -- - m r - - - - - -� �� 2 Q w � W oo C/)w�O Y�/ CD /1� .L v � ¢LLJ w C'i O LLJ Q O QJ CD C/) C/� O W W ■ LLJ ■,............... ` , O U ¢ I- Z � W jLLj �/ Ll = ~ < C/) Q 0- Cl- I I I CT LU LLJLL z Q 0 LLJQ LU CD J~ /LU,•�� Z U `! I O I ¢ O L u C✓7 ISI C/� U S X 0 Q U `! O J 0 m I I I r \ c ^ O I" LJ O cwc ��r'� O = O v O O O � Q Q I G - - - - - - 1 O I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - I I O 1� I\I Z Ll G C D J Ll `i Q � m J J I- J J , I I I I I I I I m J I I X I I I I \ ,� I I I I I I I I '-''J z J I W ' I I I I I , , I p I I I I I I • ••. I I I I I I I I I I I I I •% j •, C%i CD I I I I I I I ~ w l I I I L l I 1- l I LO N W LU c w J W Q I X I I I I x I x I x ' Q G U Cl- Q W W I I I I I C7 U O z O o O I L- - J I I I I OI p z L, 0 W ' -- -- p C7 \ Q z LU 3: z m W� Cn C� O z CD w_ p J � U J W Q z W W �.'� ¢ p LU ' I I I I I ¢ Ci Cu W w cX m C%i ¢ ' I I I I ` '•• c 07 CD O W Q~ G p O U CIO LU J CIO C/') I I I I I z L''"I � I I I I ' > 0 w o ¢ o o C~.) z p > O C~%i < z I I I I I (.o I .% I O m m w Urn z z w_ w Q zcn ti•. LLJ O m J N z m w C/) } m Q m O W I 77 I p ~ Lu � Z C/) z O 0Lu LLJ LU- W J I- O¢ ,yJ LJ LJ J LJ LJ LJ L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J ' p7 5 Q C..� } w W C-) � U d Z w w ~< > J m z LU F- (� U Q z w LU z Cn CD O U O U p X } ¢ � w Lu cn w O d N z m d U O F- CD Q � U w w J CD z O p p } 0 w � w U cn O O w Cn O ¢ Q O p z ¢ z L'-ILLJ 0 0 00 o C-) v z w -jLU Z—D C-) � o �" o LLJpLLJ Cl ZD m co Q 2 w U_ Cn LU co LLJ CD LU LLJX C-) J � LU > J _X C/) F- z m W m 0 d' Z Ow 0 Lz w J I N w w w p U 6) LL, z w F- C-) > < O VJ w O w U w 1 CM m ¢ C/J z g } w p ¢ m ¢ J O z z Y Z L) ¢ } C/) C) LLJC) J O O W Z W J O J O LLJ i¢.) U Y J ¢ I I I p ¢ C'_7 w m LU � LwL Z � ¢ _ Q U � O � � U Q CO Q 9 LU Q 'JLLJ Q Z C✓) O J U ¢ LU '� J O� cm F- z = Q J O CD -i ..••''1 I w (Cl-� �_ _ U Y O ¢ Q O z m O U Q d U J— J m I w X J} \ CL U Cn W O Q Y z (%) ❑C Q ¢ p J Z w Q � 0- LLJ U Z 6 CD F-- ¢ z m m d C'D p w cc ¢ O d } ¢ °O U w F Z w U M CU/J 9 ~ Z w w z LLQ _ co O LU d � w C -) z m U CO S Y C--) w Q w O p CCD LU ~ > w Q w = Q w Q m u d d J C O ¢ p W C.i Q Z Z I I I I I �_ J U' - J C/) F- p O \ 0 Q W � Cor -D � � LL, p O OI z z_ d m m CD �Do w z Y LCii Z Y Y w C.) � w m CO � w z O � � L�L_I � CL z Q J CCD z U L J L¢ O 0 OJ CO � Q o � LL Q �c O o .\ Cl -O O O J ¢ Z¢ W p } W GCl- LLJ ISE O ; CXJ O w CJ U O o � C) 0O Q Lu 0 Y p z Q� O O z U O Qr ~¢ "o 7 Q Q ¢ Z } ¢ � Z CJO W � S Vi -i > Vi d p U U U '��•. I L c�Q = Qo ' o X C/) < O �z O O � O �z z z� \ O d C/J _ � J U— O m � w ¢— X— cC m X w m J Q O O w cc�} w Lu m W C1 W Z (L C1 W Z Q J U J U Z --I--I > I` Lei J d OJ w z d O N p w w I I I I •.1 \I \1/ N U Ch O V L6 C.O I� Lu oO 07 C/i m ON N m N N w N III ' Z I I I ''• : '• , I C/j ¢ 'I w w w z _ QQQ �I w z O I F -- co m m LU O J u� Z Z Z Q C-) v , CD J Ucc c U Ucc O W N I % , z Q G G G U' � Q CT) U I I I '•.O•. I I I O O O Z D C N o ' 1 0 I N Q- m p - - - - - - - - - -%%m II1 CD CD Q0O EO Lu(,LLJ p co LU LU LU Q0 X C/) W W W O CIO CIO L.L L.L. L.L. L.L. 0 Q X LC) LC) U' w w CU> N N = Z I 1 i I Q L� O c I Q = Lij Q W CO Cl- LJ__I w o LU U C/) � LLJ CD 0- O 10 O J X O L.L. , L.L. L.L. (� 2 .''•.: , , , w w Y � Co v o Co o w U ' N U z O N N� CXR J z I 'I o z ¢¢ N Q U J 00 C/ U X J Q I I I O ' 'I Z 1 CD F Y Y CC/) Q w 1 LU z > z � CC) W� C 7 o w Q Q W c/� U N~ w c/D o z Q Z Q � � m QC'O z (/� z CJS Z Q m D N - 1I w 0- w w�CD ��I�, w _zo �� _I Wc r) CJ= J - N�� C.7 ¢����Q J C)Lu w LU L U Q Z U' C.D Z J O W u-, 2 Q I \I i II w QO p C/J q Y ¢J /L�^L Lu �j Li Q Lj � CD � � I I LL I \I II ,W J W Y W i U Z Z C/� W LLJ W 0 - - - - - - LL_ - - - - - - - .. :,\ ••. \ I I � /� I F- QQ Q co 0- Q L) CD Q Q� T vJ LU CQ < LUC/' L1J C) Q W co F - w J CD \ � O � m CJ I I 2 QLL Q� W N O = ,, CD J N M LL N M M �/ �..� J �~ I ~ I ' _ LJ. O C/) W W L L_ % 'I o Q O � N Coll >- U1 UzC/ = z z�zo Q -oma _ ,® o p o J N Q Q C-) < m I I L1 c� ~ Q.•':::' ' LyJ OL, CD U C-) %N.,• •.1 I C/) I m N LL_ O z \ w v) O I O w C U CC 1 o O 0Q01 Q G it Y o LU <f C, = zLO I mOU z o LU p J w Cl- z z U Lu Q C7 0 1 ''•.,1 1 'I Q w Z C� QLU LU CIO ¢ CD CD \~ ' O Q CJ J I� U U z m Z 1 0 'I U w 0- C) � c/� w O I , Lu 0 U Q O O Q �Q � 0w J z CJ zz J iI U Q Q ¢ N z c z o x LWL Z C/� m � C >- >- >- >- Z z O w C\i = I ''•'•,I I Cp z p Q z z ) 0 J Q Q Q Q CD v)z Q Z Q O QC LL Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ _/-�¢ z Q 1,< G W G G G G J LL Z U N CD I \1 •` I I 1 L.LJ I O W�CD L, W U J J J J W O co O W C/) � LL w C/) U U Q- Q- c/) �/� z o 'I C/) 1 r LLI of C D ~ o z w U U Y ' ' Q U Lu Q p I m U -i J p � C/) p 6-) 1 W 0- ¢ co o L N N L1 LL LL LL O w Q � ' I N N M 0 0 0 0 C V U W = w F - z o Q Q CD CL- Q Q Q Q J J L.L. J U� ¢ I CCQ� I 110-.8 I.O-� •• 110 19 110 I✓EZ •• •' •• • •' I 110 19 �. ••':. '•• 110 IL I' ,IIO IL 1 N \ Ni 1 I� 'SII ar.v A III)''11 . I I • ' 1 c-) w W I I I I I I � i •. i I 00 Li9, , I Iy _ I I I I I I ` I I I , Co I I I I I I I I ¢ LU cr or �, WOOb N NLLJ — CO = 1d01b10313 _ - - - - , Q LU N U _ ■ ti = z w�nro ■- O ~ LU LU ti ■ I U N w r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ .... . ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ } . O- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ * • - M z w CD LUo ■ ■ I\ 1 --------- (1 O O ■ ■ ■ \ _________ , U U U U ■ ;�.. ________- I ------- 1,T.1�9� 1,0-16 N 110-189 m 116-1Z9 LFlQ=1 Flf2i.l'N.I'1FfiJ.bb . A MIANG''1N3 `3noi��+i ID N ■ r. I J �` ■ J ■ U U Cl) N f -j 9-19Z L-1892 N 9-I - 8/l 9-M - - - 31100, V0.00N 100'066 Z I A N I A V N `d01d �N N ig3g w tg w 119 10' � J C) ¢ C/) • • U j p U Page 447 LU LU Cn 07 cy-) ti O7 U w LJJ Q z z z w '�' Qn w w U o Q w Qv z m CD J ~ =D Q 2i � E 00 I O I w Q z O �� _ o 0 0 �, Q Q Q CU/) o rn 0 CF) U z Z J C) Q w C/) Y U w w U Q E 61� rr 0 E J=DJ 7 cv Lu f o O Y O U LLJ LLJ V Q Q Cp W L1 2 Q LS'7 Z c °�' O � � U �:Li w ¢ C) LC7 O �0-co��� Q �UUow z o o I- LJ o O z CD z �o�o� w Q���� w a — U U J ca L1J w D Q �' CD m m_ z m w ZD C/) LLJ Lwl z C-� Q C? U 0 �X\ � J LJJ U V O m ¢= Y d w w p Y } O Q w w W O d 1..1... Z Z Q N m Y W w m O Q J Z p U p m U d p p p CrJ ¢ CD �i O ¢ U p U CD OU C/) Q CD (02 0 LU cn Lu Lu U C) u E X C/: � NIVAh Ol 11VM X10018 JNUSIX3 C� Q (/� N o o I I I I I I Z Z OW OW o. o. Lf7 m 0 6) Co m J J J J J I O O 0 O O Cn .996WC 0, J I` CD O CO 't c') Q Q Q Q Q Q f` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > > 0 00'0££ 3„OO,�Oo00N � o � � � � � � � N � N � � � � o llt/M�i0018JNIlSIX3 O o co N o ti � � - - - - _ _ 11yM 110018 JNUSIX3 z C/) O O C) LO z a' o J z F7 °O co CO ¢c) - V,- O O I U w R�: O N wL/ I ' XL/ I L^, XL/ IL/ I ' XL/ I ' I Z z N N N O O N , i 10g IV V i ,0 ”' IV V i IOJ "' IV V I 109 IV V I 109 "• IV N I , C/) O~ w c m Q , w w ('� L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ ' ' I U LuO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J ' I z� --- I I I I - L.L. a� ■ I C/) p U' ■ \ C=) z 0 CD'-:mL�D 110 IL I' 'I10 1 ' lV.l'� 13.30TM: ; d'1 o C"ifig= o cn !s� N Li c j LLJ w C/) O OW z ■ CD 0 LL C/) O aw) � OCD CD - - - -�S \-- -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- \\- -- -- - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- L -Li Q W O o ~ CD Q Z LU LU LU Q O' - - -- -- -- -- - m r - - - - - -� �� 2 Q w � W oo C/)w�O Y�/ CD /1� .L v � ¢LLJ w C'i O LLJ Q O QJ CD C/) C/� O W W ■ LLJ ■,............... ` , O U ¢ I- Z � W jLLj �/ Ll = ~ < C/) Q 0- Cl- I I I CT LU LLJLL z Q 0 LLJQ LU CD J~ /LU,•�� Z U `! I O I ¢ O L u C✓7 ISI C/� U S X 0 Q U `! O J 0 m I I I r \ c ^ O I" LJ O cwc ��r'� O = O v O O O � Q Q I G - - - - - - 1 O I r - - - - - - - - - - - - - -r - - - - - - I I O 1� I\I Z Ll G C D J Ll `i Q � m J J I- J J , I I I I I I I I m J I I X I I I I \ ,� I I I I I I I I '-''J z J I W ' I I I I I , , I p I I I I I I • ••. I I I I I I I I I I I I I •% j •, C%i CD I I I I I I I ~ w l I I I L l I 1- l I LO N W LU c w J W Q I X I I I I x I x I x ' Q G U Cl- Q W W I I I I I C7 U O z O o O I L- - J I I I I OI p z L, 0 W ' -- -- p C7 \ Q z LU 3: z m W� Cn C� O z CD w_ p J � U J W Q z W W �.'� ¢ p LU ' I I I I I ¢ Ci Cu W w cX m C%i ¢ ' I I I I ` '•• c 07 CD O W Q~ G p O U CIO LU J CIO C/') I I I I I z L''"I � I I I I ' > 0 w o ¢ o o C~.) z p > O C~%i < z I I I I I (.o I .% I O m m w Urn z z w_ w Q zcn ti•. LLJ O m J N z m w C/) } m Q m O W I 77 I p ~ Lu � Z C/) z O 0Lu LLJ LU- W J I- O¢ ,yJ LJ LJ J LJ LJ LJ L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J ' p7 5 Q C..� } w W C-) � U d Z w w ~< > J m z LU F- (� U Q z w LU z Cn CD O U O U p X } ¢ � w Lu cn w O d N z m d U O F- CD Q � U w w J CD z O p p } 0 w � w U cn O O w Cn O ¢ Q O p z ¢ z L'-ILLJ 0 0 00 o C-) v z w -jLU Z—D C-) � o �" o LLJpLLJ Cl ZD m co Q 2 w U_ Cn LU co LLJ CD LU LLJX C-) J � LU > J _X C/) F- z m W m 0 d' Z Ow 0 Lz w J I N w w w p U 6) LL, z w F- C-) > < O VJ w O w U w 1 CM m ¢ C/J z g } w p ¢ m ¢ J O z z Y Z L) ¢ } C/) C) LLJC) J O O W Z W J O J O LLJ i¢.) U Y J ¢ I I I p ¢ C'_7 w m LU � LwL Z � ¢ _ Q U � O � � U Q CO Q 9 LU Q 'JLLJ Q Z C✓) O J U ¢ LU '� J O� cm F- z = Q J O CD -i ..••''1 I w (Cl-� �_ _ U Y O ¢ Q O z m O U Q d U J— J m I w X J} \ CL U Cn W O Q Y z (%) ❑C Q ¢ p J Z w Q � 0- LLJ U Z 6 CD F-- ¢ z m m d C'D p w cc ¢ O d } ¢ °O U w F Z w U M CU/J 9 ~ Z w w z LLQ _ co O LU d � w C -) z m U CO S Y C--) w Q w O p CCD LU ~ > w Q w = Q w Q m u d d J C O ¢ p W C.i Q Z Z I I I I I �_ J U' - J C/) F- p O \ 0 Q W � Cor -D � � LL, p O OI z z_ d m m CD �Do w z Y LCii Z Y Y w C.) � w m CO � w z O � � L�L_I � CL z Q J CCD z U L J L¢ O 0 OJ CO � Q o � LL Q �c O o .\ Cl -O O O J ¢ Z¢ W p } W GCl- LLJ ISE O ; CXJ O w CJ U O o � C) 0O Q Lu 0 Y p z Q� O O z U O Qr ~¢ "o 7 Q Q ¢ Z } ¢ � Z CJO W � S Vi -i > Vi d p U U U '��•. I L c�Q = Qo ' o X C/) < O �z O O � O �z z z� \ O d C/J _ � J U— O m � w ¢— X— cC m X w m J Q O O w cc�} w Lu m W C1 W Z (L C1 W Z Q J U J U Z --I--I > I` Lei J d OJ w z d O N p w w I I I I •.1 \I \1/ N U Ch O V L6 C.O I� Lu oO 07 C/i m ON N m N N w N III ' Z I I I ''• : '• , I C/j ¢ 'I w w w z _ QQQ �I w z O I F -- co m m LU O J u� Z Z Z Q C-) v , CD J Ucc c U Ucc O W N I % , z Q G G G U' � Q CT) U I I I '•.O•. I I I O O O Z D C N o ' 1 0 I N Q- m p - - - - - - - - - -%%m II1 CD CD Q0O EO Lu(,LLJ p co LU LU LU Q0 X C/) W W W O CIO CIO L.L L.L. L.L. L.L. 0 Q X LC) LC) U' w w CU> N N = Z I 1 i I Q L� O c I Q = Lij Q W CO Cl- LJ__I w o LU U C/) � LLJ CD 0- O 10 O J X O L.L. , L.L. L.L. (� 2 .''•.: , , , w w Y � Co v o Co o w U ' N U z O N N� CXR J z I 'I o z ¢¢ N Q U J 00 C/ U X J Q I I I O ' 'I Z 1 CD F Y Y CC/) Q w 1 LU z > z � CC) W� C 7 o w Q Q W c/� U N~ w c/D o z Q Z Q � � m QC'O z (/� z CJS Z Q m D N - 1I w 0- w w�CD ��I�, w _zo �� _I Wc r) CJ= J - N�� C.7 ¢����Q J C)Lu w LU L U Q Z U' C.D Z J O W u-, 2 Q I \I i II w QO p C/J q Y ¢J /L�^L Lu �j Li Q Lj � CD � � I I LL I \I II ,W J W Y W i U Z Z C/� W LLJ W 0 - - - - - - LL_ - - - - - - - .. :,\ ••. \ I I � /� I F- QQ Q co 0- Q L) CD Q Q� T vJ LU CQ < LUC/' L1J C) Q W co F - w J CD \ � O � m CJ I I 2 QLL Q� W N O = ,, CD J N M LL N M M �/ �..� J �~ I ~ I ' _ LJ. O C/) W W L L_ % 'I o Q O � N Coll >- U1 UzC/ = z z�zo Q -oma _ ,® o p o J N Q Q C-) < m I I L1 c� ~ Q.•':::' ' LyJ OL, CD U C-) %N.,• •.1 I C/) I m N LL_ O z \ w v) O I O w C U CC 1 o O 0Q01 Q G it Y o LU <f C, = zLO I mOU z o LU p J w Cl- z z U Lu Q C7 0 1 ''•.,1 1 'I Q w Z C� QLU LU CIO ¢ CD CD \~ ' O Q CJ J I� U U z m Z 1 0 'I U w 0- C) � c/� w O I , Lu 0 U Q O O Q �Q � 0w J z CJ zz J iI U Q Q ¢ N z c z o x LWL Z C/� m � C >- >- >- >- Z z O w C\i = I ''•'•,I I Cp z p Q z z ) 0 J Q Q Q Q CD v)z Q Z Q O QC LL Z_ Z_ Z_ Z_ _/-�¢ z Q 1,< G W G G G G J LL Z U N CD I \1 •` I I 1 L.LJ I O W�CD L, W U J J J J W O co O W C/) � LL w C/) U U Q- Q- c/) �/� z o 'I C/) 1 r LLI of C D ~ o z w U U Y ' ' Q U Lu Q p I m U -i J p � C/) p 6-) 1 W 0- ¢ co o L N N L1 LL LL LL O w Q � ' I N N M 0 0 0 0 C V U W = w F - z o Q Q CD CL- Q Q Q Q J J L.L. J U� ¢ I CCQ� I 110-.8 I.O-� •• 110 19 110 I✓EZ •• •' •• • •' I 110 19 �. ••':. '•• 110 IL I' ,IIO IL 1 N \ Ni 1 I� 'SII ar.v A III)''11 . I I • ' 1 c-) w W I I I I I I � i •. i I 00 Li9, , I Iy _ I I I I I I ` I I I , Co I I I I I I I I ¢ LU cr or �, WOOb N NLLJ — CO = 1d01b10313 _ - - - - , Q LU N U _ ■ ti = z w�nro ■- O ~ LU LU ti ■ I U N w r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ .... . ■ ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ ■ ■ } . O- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - ■ ■ * • - M z w CD LUo ■ ■ I\ 1 --------- (1 O O ■ ■ ■ \ _________ , U U U U ■ ;�.. ________- I ------- 1,T.1�9� 1,0-16 N 110-189 m 116-1Z9 LFlQ=1 Flf2i.l'N.I'1FfiJ.bb . A MIANG''1N3 `3noi��+i ID N ■ r. I J �` ■ J ■ U U Cl) N f -j 9-19Z L-1892 N 9-I - 8/l 9-M - - - 31100, V0.00N 100'066 Z I A N I A V N `d01d �N N ig3g w tg w 119 10' � J C) ¢ C/) • • U j p U Page 447 LU LU Cn NIVW3b Ol 11VM X10018 ONUSIX3 J z 1886'8ZS LU LU ~ 75 � w J _ _ _ _ ,00'0££ 3„OO,�Oa00N ]]VM NOO18 ONIISIX3 w Q 2 c� U Luz c� �• 1 Lo _Jz CD J < Q JQ LU LU 0 CDm L{i � LU I 1 I I I • z J =~ O J 1 i IOJ It V i IOJ IK V i IOJ ”' IK V I IOJ "' IK Y I IOJ I Y V ' U Qd L.I..I c C co m Q O U = G L _ mw O O z O I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J ' U Q LL O 0 z _j mz ow 1 � w CJ X I U w w w Q LLJ �o z a z I CD 1 1 I • 1 1• ■ I 1 • ■ • 1 I z J • I CD ; - - - - -- ; 1I z • ■ 1 1 11 1-1-1 • ■ • I 1 w • ■ 1 11 � o • ■ : 1 I J U • ■ I Q 1 C/) ■ 1 1 I I � Y O 1 1 U 1 r _ _ _ _ - _ -r _ _ _ _ - _ -r _ _ _ _ - _ O I I I I I J X I m 1 W I W I I 1 I I I z LLJ I I 1 I I I LU I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I , • I CD I I 1 I I I 1 1 1O^ I I 1 I I^ OI I /O� I I^O L J I • I I 1 I u J u J I I u J X I X X X I I I I I I � • IL - _ _ - _ _ I I I I � • 1 I O O I I I I I co I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I • '1 I I I I I I � I I I i I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ L__ J L L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J I ■1 I I I I I � I I I J i I I I I i Q U I ■ m CD z I ■I LU ■ I I ' I I I I ■ I I I I I ' z I I I c¢ I G I 0 J I J , Q N Y OU I I I d O N O a z � X LU I ' • I ■ I I I i I LU I O } i ■1 O) ■ • I I I O �1 Z I I I • LLJU z LLJ J I I LL. I LLJ w LL_ ■ (f� coO LL_ co F- • Q C0 O C/ mN ■ _ I 1- i CD DC N O O^ C/) Lu i o i I I O ^ Cy \ � E LOI ; � 1 Q O N >_ CD CD . �+ UZ�= z 1 CD w O z0,,C — z T_ Q� c w z I I J Of Q Q C)CD ■� z oil co l"l w CD z X11 0LLJ � � wl 1 01 0 1 I NII ■ o i (' 00 0 I I I z 1 0 U 1 I z 11 X 1 � I 1 I I I I ccoo. OCD AI 1 ' 1 m77 I I I w 1 I ry, z 1 � � I � 1 ' I I I i ■ 1 � � 1 IIO-IbEZ I 1 � - - -- o III 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 � � I I I i o � 1 I I I I I - I I I I I , ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I LU I I I Q Q 1 WOOb ---- I-'-' 6LAI ; = 1 1VOIb10313––––––– ---- I Q I` LU - w�nro B – O ~ LU N U W I w O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M _________ CD z I D o D o o D o=___ ___- I z \ \ \ \ 0 0 U U U U U O O IL U U U 0 0 0 0 0 b 00000000 � b .......... z - - �.7SS.� J I � I J I � I N 31100, VOo00N 100'066 Z -Q - i n N I A V N `d01d wED g CIQ U w LU Q CIO Page 448 1— N i Q Q, cm O 1 cm N 07 co O7 U LLJ w Q z z C/) =D z z opo v, Lu z w C/) w v o Q ��QIn� LLJ Q v m CD~ Q � �O O w Q z 0 �� } _ LLJ o 0 0 CD Q O Q Q � O O O rn U J z J U Q U Cn LLJ W C-) Q E o E F__ J U O= C5� U LLJ LLJ Q Q _� p w a? I�L Lo zC"i H o QQ Oz U w w D Q � O co N �_ O Ow z U O w '_ o LLJ O00 LLJ Q O z 67 O L J J = c9 C/� w � Z U _J Q ~ JLLJ U U Q ' .. c6 w Q U LLf7 CD 0 d w m CD L. ~ W z w O 0_ L.L Q �_ C? C-) Q O �) m C9 U v �' Q_ LLJ Z 11 M - u"I z O d 1�1� Z p Z Q N— 'T Y W W J LO F C m p Q J Z � U m U d � O cn cry Q 2i C D �i O Q U O U C/:) n W L L Q LU Lu Lu L) �L��u E Xmcr:v) NIVW3b Ol 11VM X10018 ONUSIX3 J z 1886'8ZS LU LU ~ 75 � w J _ _ _ _ ,00'0££ 3„OO,�Oa00N ]]VM NOO18 ONIISIX3 w Q 2 c� U Luz c� �• 1 Lo _Jz CD J < Q JQ LU LU 0 CDm L{i � LU I 1 I I I • z J =~ O J 1 i IOJ It V i IOJ IK V i IOJ ”' IK V I IOJ "' IK Y I IOJ I Y V ' U Qd L.I..I c C co m Q O U = G L _ mw O O z O I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J ' U Q LL O 0 z _j mz ow 1 � w CJ X I U w w w Q LLJ �o z a z I CD 1 1 I • 1 1• ■ I 1 • ■ • 1 I z J • I CD ; - - - - -- ; 1I z • ■ 1 1 11 1-1-1 • ■ • I 1 w • ■ 1 11 � o • ■ : 1 I J U • ■ I Q 1 C/) ■ 1 1 I I � Y O 1 1 U 1 r _ _ _ _ - _ -r _ _ _ _ - _ -r _ _ _ _ - _ O I I I I I J X I m 1 W I W I I 1 I I I z LLJ I I 1 I I I LU I I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I , • I CD I I 1 I I I 1 1 1O^ I I 1 I I^ OI I /O� I I^O L J I • I I 1 I u J u J I I u J X I X X X I I I I I I � • IL - _ _ - _ _ I I I I � • 1 I O O I I I I I co I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I • '1 I I I I I I � I I I i I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I ■ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ■ L__ J L L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J I ■1 I I I I I � I I I J i I I I I i Q U I ■ m CD z I ■I LU ■ I I ' I I I I ■ I I I I I ' z I I I c¢ I G I 0 J I J , Q N Y OU I I I d O N O a z � X LU I ' • I ■ I I I i I LU I O } i ■1 O) ■ • I I I O �1 Z I I I • LLJU z LLJ J I I LL. I LLJ w LL_ ■ (f� coO LL_ co F- • Q C0 O C/ mN ■ _ I 1- i CD DC N O O^ C/) Lu i o i I I O ^ Cy \ � E LOI ; � 1 Q O N >_ CD CD . �+ UZ�= z 1 CD w O z0,,C — z T_ Q� c w z I I J Of Q Q C)CD ■� z oil co l"l w CD z X11 0LLJ � � wl 1 01 0 1 I NII ■ o i (' 00 0 I I I z 1 0 U 1 I z 11 X 1 � I 1 I I I I ccoo. OCD AI 1 ' 1 m77 I I I w 1 I ry, z 1 � � I � 1 ' I I I i ■ 1 � � 1 IIO-IbEZ I 1 � - - -- o III 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 � � I I I i o � 1 I I I I I - I I I I I , ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L I I I I I I LU I I I Q Q 1 WOOb ---- I-'-' 6LAI ; = 1 1VOIb10313––––––– ---- I Q I` LU - w�nro B – O ~ LU N U W I w O _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ M _________ CD z I D o D o o D o=___ ___- I z \ \ \ \ 0 0 U U U U U O O IL U U U 0 0 0 0 0 b 00000000 � b .......... z - - �.7SS.� J I � I J I � I N 31100, VOo00N 100'066 Z -Q - i n N I A V N `d01d wED g CIQ U w LU Q CIO Page 448 1— N i Q Q, cm O 1 cm N m Q w o J C?Cl) LL. in ~ CD _J = U z C7 Q w S CD z w r X U N d w J � Q z = U Q z a OC: w LU or J wi U U or p Q L U Ll- L, U CD M � = o z z LU U O O OU Q LU Z Q o Q C/) 0_ � O J LU z Q w F_ O LU CL' J J W LU > � = z O p Q Q m U p w LL LU w z LU C) w U o w z Cn Op S p Q U C/) z Q Q o J Y J O CI_ r-) Olb£Z LU LLJ 0-IZ� 0-IZ9 0-IZ0 10-.6E o w Lu o c� o z w /� z p Q U CO 0 0-16E C/U O x ti m C.:i __j I I I LU O U w X x J LU z� 0 p p p p � ~ Z Z LU LU LU LU z zti z z z = orz z o 0 0 0 ,.,., cC O — v LO m m F_ N CS zf LC) CO I� CD U �� N LL O N Y O w O Lf siivm jdnSO10N3 HS` U 110-18 118-IbL 0 b-18 r 110 17 6% (� 0 77 I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J L _j L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L_ I I__ J L__ J L__ J SN0111 Od KOO (OL) d�0 Ilb-IL X10110-15 0 0 I I JJ O O JQ Q OCC) W W � ZD _ ZD CCJ)C/)C O ] � J ci zZD Z LU U U w 9 x X 9 CD FO ~ o, o bo CO W z Li Q J , I I I W C/) 0 0 0 co J � z o I w 118 11 118-IZ 110 1£ w o J I I I I I I I O O I I O O O I O IIO-18 „Z II L IS 119 110-1£ IO -I£ 119 b I I I I 17.7.V IIOV `/ II fl zp W I I J Y z I z m c/) U J OLO w = w Q LO zw C/)m� CD o p o c')LU m 0 w � J w z I I I 0 w I, w _ QQ QQ _ W J C) Oi Oi p QLU UI C 7 CQ7 0 0 0 z Q J aQ`�aC-/) U J W ;o 121 O z co M M~Q U z w LU F_ :z �XLuLu =oo �z z")��>N = Q�q� x o C/) CO) p d M O d¢ < J � Q I I I 0 0 I I 0 0 LC) LC) I I I I I I I C) I I I o I I 0 0 Lf) LO I I I I A030 3NINd773W 3S 000`b 30 3903 I U w p I I I z Li, z z Q Q - LLJ z o ow U `L' I LO w LCA CD O N ti I Ci LL I O w CD ld�l�l�313 I I I I I I I I z Q I I I J 0 110-16£ 110-IZ9 0-IZ9 0-IZ9 110-16£ N { O Q m 110 I✓£Z p W ly O W J Q LL �' Page 449 w O ,� L O O 1 O N U C-3 z z C 00 w a zw wz O w W �o Q --�--I Q C__) J r ~ � Q LU d L) o 6) O � O) w p Qw Q = C/) Lu O O O O J O Q U F- ZD Q cop m O rn U z J U z WN Y w w U I_¢ o Q o C 0 I Q C O U LC7 z� = U� 1" w Y C� // �11 �O O C3) N o z < cn w w U QQ°� 119 ami I..L =QLoZ U m� U w Ll - z Q F_ z _j z ^ Li7 ` LL OO z U �p �1 - O N 6> c� U o w 1 � z = o C I,_I O O Q O Q z LL O O7 C� .. coc1J C� a�� Q C=.) w cC z S U L LZ ZD C/) w w OC �JU�� cu w L.L Q m C-) � I > LUpQLnF— �x` �C J LU N C-) V mCC) Y w w z J w z °� p o~ w O 0 z O O a ^ W Q �1 O Q) VL.Lj O Q Y LU J LO F— c D p U D m Q Q C3 p Q Q CC `t S C1 Q O CD W S I 1� ID U m w D n cc O U O U U oC cn L L_ Lo OU Q Lu O O N N m Q w o J C?Cl) LL. in ~ CD _J = U z C7 Q w S CD z w r X U N d w J � Q z = U Q z a OC: w LU or J wi U U or p Q L U Ll- L, U CD M � = o z z LU U O O OU Q LU Z Q o Q C/) 0_ � O J LU z Q w F_ O LU CL' J J W LU > � = z O p Q Q m U p w LL LU w z LU C) w U o w z Cn Op S p Q U C/) z Q Q o J Y J O CI_ r-) Olb£Z LU LLJ 0-IZ� 0-IZ9 0-IZ0 10-.6E o w Lu o c� o z w /� z p Q U CO 0 0-16E C/U O x ti m C.:i __j I I I LU O U w X x J LU z� 0 p p p p � ~ Z Z LU LU LU LU z zti z z z = orz z o 0 0 0 ,.,., cC O — v LO m m F_ N CS zf LC) CO I� CD U �� N LL O N Y O w O Lf siivm jdnSO10N3 HS` U 110-18 118-IbL 0 b-18 r 110 17 6% (� 0 77 I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I J L _j L__ J L__ J L__ J L__ J L_ I I__ J L__ J L__ J SN0111 Od KOO (OL) d�0 Ilb-IL X10110-15 0 0 I I JJ O O JQ Q OCC) W W � ZD _ ZD CCJ)C/)C O ] � J ci zZD Z LU U U w 9 x X 9 CD FO ~ o, o bo CO W z Li Q J , I I I W C/) 0 0 0 co J � z o I w 118 11 118-IZ 110 1£ w o J I I I I I I I O O I I O O O I O IIO-18 „Z II L IS 119 110-1£ IO -I£ 119 b I I I I 17.7.V IIOV `/ II fl zp W I I J Y z I z m c/) U J OLO w = w Q LO zw C/)m� CD o p o c')LU m 0 w � J w z I I I 0 w I, w _ QQ QQ _ W J C) Oi Oi p QLU UI C 7 CQ7 0 0 0 z Q J aQ`�aC-/) U J W ;o 121 O z co M M~Q U z w LU F_ :z �XLuLu =oo �z z")��>N = Q�q� x o C/) CO) p d M O d¢ < J � Q I I I 0 0 I I 0 0 LC) LC) I I I I I I I C) I I I o I I 0 0 Lf) LO I I I I A030 3NINd773W 3S 000`b 30 3903 I U w p I I I z Li, z z Q Q - LLJ z o ow U `L' I LO w LCA CD O N ti I Ci LL I O w CD ld�l�l�313 I I I I I I I I z Q I I I J 0 110-16£ 110-IZ9 0-IZ9 0-IZ9 110-16£ N { O Q m 110 I✓£Z p W ly O W J Q LL �' Page 449 w O ,� L O O 1 O N Page 450 U C-3 �Q - �z z CD 00 C/) N zw wz O w W Uo Q CD W Q o 00 J r ~ ZD a LU s L) o 6) 0 C::) O' w O z Q Q w C/)_ O O O O J O Q U Q co O O O U z I c- W N Y y W w U_ Q o Q o E 0 I Q O U LC7 z U3 J" W orY (D co OO�N o z m J LLJ w U �, QQ000w � U QNQ ~ pz c� w '� z F— Q (Lo ^ Q Liz LL OO z CC) N Y O CD U O w m p O zQ O v < O-) OC\J J I 2 co c z S U �_ J CO C/) pC J� U Q I J ) co W Q U N w o¢ I F- x O W W J CO z °� O L.L o z w O L.L Q m U W I Q �1 > J w N U� O mCC) Q Y Y w Q w z w O Q O `t a Q w W O O a /�1 11C\J O d7 VL -U w J LO� C Li D U m U w D c/J Q (3 cc O Q U CC S U O U' U Cr S cn O OU Q LLJ O � O ID N NLLJ Page 450 0 LO 0 N O o O o� o�co coCDco coro CO CO 0 0CIOLO Loco YJ h LO N N z Q N ' II CD J LL Q U ..0-.6E ..0-,Z�..0-.6E U- J Y w I I I I I O w I O ' Z ' J WI� I I I I 1 LTJ LTJ I I I I I I I I I _ I _ O O I I I I I I I I I I ° I o O I I I I I O I O O O O I co I I I I I I I I I I I I I o � o r-� I r-� o o � o I I I I o � I I o p[ o I I I ' M I I I I QQ I I QQ 0 0 � I I I � o I o I I I I I I I I I I W O m z zJ� o � _ � o m o F-- C,') ~ � W I � X�� I I I W J O �y O w = p L��C7w � Q w Z_ Q J W m I J O� 0� I I X � X Z w O � O w d � O � U Q QJQ�� I I O I I I I O O I O r � I r-� I 1 ICD CM LU L�J LU I I I LTJ I LTJ I I I I w w I I I O�= J I NLu U3 CD G�J w I Q m � U LID I z --j �1 O O N m w o � Q Q� I =i2 w OC I o ' o� I w � I I �� II II I I I I o � p O II II � I I I I I I I ..0-.6£ ..0-,ZO ..0-.Z9 ..0-.Z9 ..0-.6£ 0 LO 0 N O o O o� o�co coCDco coro CO CO 0 0CIOLO Loco YJ h LO N N z Q N ' II CD J LL Q U ..0-.6E ..0-,Z�..0-.6E U- J Y w I I I I I O w I O ' Z ' J WI� I I I I 1 LTJ LTJ I I I I I I I I I _ I _ O O I I I I I I I I I I ° I o O I I I I I O I O O O O I co I I I I I I I I I I I I I o � o r-� I r-� o o � o I I I I o � I I o p[ o I I I ' M I I I I QQ I I QQ 0 0 � I I I � o I o I I I I I I I I I I W O m z zJ� o � _ � o m o F-- C,') ~ � W I � X�� I I I W J O �y O w = p L��C7w � Q w Z_ Q J W m I J O� 0� I I X � X Z w O � O w d � O � U Q QJQ�� I I O I I I I O O I O r � I r-� I 1 ICD CM LU L�J LU I I I LTJ I LTJ I I I I w w I I I O�= J I NLu U3 CD G�J w I Q m � U LID I z --j �1 O O N C C. 0 L L L L L L C, G L O H d O U O U w U w U O J L -LJ Q w O z— ::D J z Q >- or = O Y w O� o a< O° O O Y U ~ w J J Q > o = CD _ O z J L Q F w L>L C c J L U C F co W > J z = - o < Ll--! C O r = O p U Q w� O� w O LLJ z � X w C C) Co m < x w o L_ - J w wZ� o M w w cv rJ Q O O z CD O— Q � J w z Or CD C)- wz U O UC/) z} LSC--) Or� OM p LLJ LU O I I O 0 U UQ ti Q I � U I Q ti c- Q U' o Q J 7}, Z CD C/) w � w w w w z Q C%� Q U U m z CD 0 LiCC/) �� z CD �� CDS Q� ca/) co I N c� � J c9 ti m ::D� w z z CL 00 CL CD Cl- C/) Q ZD p Q L LLJ 45� O Q N O O O O m LLi ��LJ� z w w z O w w L i U J � C/)�w , Q m Z Q d ZD M U z CD \ Q z c� �LLJ O W m CD~ J \ w C) w Q � o- w Y= w p i O C� p i w Z Q LLJQ w =� _> �o= = w OpU� z U F-� z< w LL = C-) LLJO 6) O O CJ) O w m J O Q U �o Q L (/) z3: a V/G J LULL,<c C/) M CS) O 6) U o z � 9 Z L,��� � Co � Q<CD L ) C/) z J U B UJ C/) Y \` w CEJ ON F-- L) O LLJ= NQS C-) C-) ��U� 00 CD O w w U �Q E Lro E L \� \ y o Q �_ Z¢ C) Y J o L^LJ � O C"iY o � � CD O U cl� LU J w W U Q� O L� .� I�L O Q CLo V Q U LLJ Q } o LLJ ~ Oz U L:Lj w w Q ^ Q Lo i L1 co z <�, L� 'D N O U O Lu L ` z L p Q �— L -J 2 O LLJ LLJ Of z O v LLJ O 6) O J J 2 C/� C� �U�// z � W = U o_ w LL U V)LL_ ZD � J UJULLJ �� w —f=)< F- x LJ CD Q UO J z m z CD O� CS) F --V CD U F Cl- O CD o Q _ Zi O L1_ Q N z z W c pwp O Q J Z Cl-C\j Q J O U m U d O O O U) C D O Q U O U U � C/) w z Q ����� i:�C-) �� C) LU m w p CD �c ==== C/) z _ _ 3NIl E XmcLu � U J �11�3dObd\ - w C C. 0 L L L L L L C, G L O H d O O U w U w U O J L -LJ Q w O z— ::D J z Q >- or = O Y w O� o a< O° O O Y U ~ w J J Q > o = CD _ O z J L Q F w L>L C c J L U C F co W > J z = - o < Ll--! C O r = O p U Q w� O� w O LLJ z � X w C C) Co m < x w o L_ - J w wZ� o M w w m rJ Q O O z CD O— Q � J w z Or CD C)- wz U O UC/) z} LSC--) Or� OM p LLJ LU O I I O 0 U UQ ti Q I � U I Q ti c- Q U' o Q J 7}, Z CD C/) w � w w � O Q C%� Q U U m z CD 0 LiCC/) �� �C�/) �� CDS Q� ca/) co I N c� � J c9 ti m ::D� w CL CL CL CD Cl- C/) Q C C. 0 L L L L L L C, G L O H NUMN, a IN z 0 Q w I w w Q U cn Page 451 w Q Cn z w O w w — � J C/) J O Z U p w w w J 3: c) p w U 7 w Z p 7 W p LU = C = z Q J Z ~ LLI Q ] w C L m = U O o � O O J z Cl- M 7 I` 06 6) d O � Oco 0 Y m U ZD J J U w J _ U O O Y U ~ w J J Q > o = CD _ O 0 z Q J L Q F w L>L C c J L U C F co W > J z = - o < Ll--! C O r = w zLJ z w p � z Q X LLJ 0 M z Q w O LLJ z � X w C C) Co m < x w o L_ - d d M CSI C CV M -ZI Lf> C NUMN, a IN z 0 Q w I w w Q U cn Page 451 w Q Cn z w O w w — � J C/) J O Z U p w w w J 3: c) p w U 7 w Z p 7 W p LU = C = z Q J Z ~ LLI Q ] w C L m = U O o � O O J z Cl- M 7 I` 06 6) z 0 Q LU I LU O Q U z 0 Q LU I LU Q LU z 0 Q LU I LU Of O z Q, LO N m r z � Q o LLJ c� cL J z \ CD LU O U zOp Q 7}, Z w � O Q < O p � w� CD 0 Q � �U- Q C/) m � .6c/�~ Y w�¢U¢ \ ED ZD p Q 45� O Q N O O O O m LLi ��LJ� L i U J � C/)�w , Q m Z Q d ZD \ �LLJ O Cr�cQ Ow=l \ w C) w w > G w Y= w \ Z OO Cn w =� _> �o= = w OpU� z U F-� z< w LL X } x LU w m �o L (/) z3: a V/G J LULL,<c \ C/) o z � 9 00 C/) L,��� � Co � Q<CD L ) C/) \` w CEJ ON F-- LL LLJ= NQS C-) C-) ��U� 00 CD O ® ® \� \ y o � � z LU �\ LLJ Q } .00V ` z L Q 2 z � C� �U�// W w LL U V)LL_ LJ CD Q UO �LLJ� �{ m w z Cl- CD o _ Cl-C\j Q J N CD F J C z c0 �� C) LU m w p CD �c ==== C/) z _ _ 3NIl � U J �11�3dObd\ - w Q w F- CJ CD �E m J Q F oa W v Cl v W� CD a > - J o c/) O O w =o Q O M w O J CL �� %i +� —1 U„ w0 O z z C) U N 3f1N3Ad dNd d1NVS Q � cn _ 10'10 ��� C-) ZO Lv w Q J CDCD L) z 0 Q LU I LU O Q U z 0 Q LU I LU Q LU z 0 Q LU I LU Of O z Q, LO N ¢ . w w x _ Cn0¢� L,-, OwJO L_ w ¢ _ Q z 3: co w Z ¢ J J ¢ O J N W w W ¢ w I � C/) ¢ � LuLu � QJ z ��I OJ w = O m 0IN—Moold I X00 3N1� '�00 w v CDz < r - _o p w J C I =0-cn L_ Q z LU J ¢ ¢ J LL W 0 Q W ofC/)¢ WO Ow CL = J Z �_��� OJ w = O m ORN—Frloo J J = m C/ 0 LLJ z z w LLJ LLJ U I �C/)Q c3}� W J d LLJ O~ LLJ J LL_ = 0 o - J C--) w J Lu = Qm� 1HJ13H 3041d ., /4 8-A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I 1H 'M .0- U Page 452 CD ONn 'dAibZ 0 U cn c I z J NV�d ]IS dlil 10'8 HA 'ONOO @ Al 07 LLJ U ZD c/� ¢ w U O LU w w Q P- co 1.0-.8 1.0-.c ¢ = 8 ..E l A -,Z w A � oC-1 O Q ti O Q o LLJ LU U U 8 z z c/) M C/) J C�6 O LLJ0 <Qo � >- z C-? _ U ¢ ¢ U 0 J M o O7 U UU CMI 06 Cl? <0 Qd C111 �zp ¢ m o Q oz= W W U z z NJ � Q ti � ~ z O w z w < z z 2i z O Q L¢i w _ p < � -T Z o O p U O U- Q o w O z Cl 0 O O Uco w w Q w w z�= Q J U ¢ < LULU U J Z w¢cn p z ¢ w m v o wNM ��^ vJ Q CL j ~ LU O I J U U U W U' D o w z w O z J Q W Y[L S0 Z U O= W w= O z d C-) O O� U C/) O U ¢ Md C/) 0 w ¢ z U J z ��/� �/J o 0 o LLJ 12HIM11 CD U z Qp Q� J� LLJ � m p J J � � � o � �,� �- J<w¢ � Q ..0-.8£ W ¢ U w coo -C:) z CD LU ¢ : z= c? z J U Q W LJJ C-) U C/) � Q E Cl:: o ¢ w J d Uj w w J 06 J ¢ � 7 I o W U Cl -I` o LU Cn o� O U � C� J _LLJ LC7 U Q� � �� w ami Oo��z C/) CO O E cn c/) o o F V) _ ~OZ O a ¢ mQ CD ) C SO3w ¢Lp '` w co O �- z U o w oZw � w ¢ z C/) Lu CD .6 5E o � CC) LLJ w w w � c/) i— � � O~N CD "� Z - ~ U C/) w Q O 00 O z 67 O J J 2 0 C/) m mac~/) o O =vwpz0 CD CD 0- ¢a w CD Z _p U LLJ 0 W W ¢ � � � � 9 J C/) CD >< W ~ ZD LU Lu Z O M U U Q .. C6 LLJ Q U C Caw ❑C C�) ~ C/) = OOYpcoQ 0 d w_ m CD L. ~ CC G LLJ Cl) z C/) O LLJJ w O � L.L Q �_ C? CD w Q (�)Lu CD m C9 U `-' z O Q 0 0 CD En � - 0 z w O= z ���00� - Q- LLJ Z W M } O w CCC = z U O CD —J LU L) O LL_ /1 z z 'T Q N Y W w J X) F C m o Q _:_i Z �p c� ocJn m wwo Lu J m cn 0 Cn m co ¢ co C� Zi O ¢ U O U OU � c/) W 0 �LLJ LLJ � Lu z UJJ z ¢ O W L.JCCJOorC/)_ ~O C/) CD ¢ U CL = w ¢ 0 3N1�'�00 I U CV Om N :Lt' Q ��O� Q Z NMV Si Dd (� � ��� E XLLJ C/)�� ¢ . w w x _ Cn0¢� L,-, OwJO L_ w ¢ _ Q z 3: co w Z ¢ J J ¢ O J N W w W ¢ w I � C/) ¢ � LuLu � QJ z ��I OJ w = O m 0IN—Moold I X00 3N1� '�00 w v CDz < r - _o p w J C I =0-cn L_ Q z LU J ¢ ¢ J LL W 0 Q W ofC/)¢ WO Ow CL = J Z �_��� OJ w = O m ORN—Frloo J J = m C/ 0 LLJ z z w LLJ LLJ U I �C/)Q c3}� W J d LLJ O~ LLJ J LL_ = 0 o - J C--) w J Lu = Qm� 1HJ13H 3041d ., /4 8-A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I 1H 'M .0- U Page 452 CD ONn 'dAibZ 0 U cn c I z J NV�d ]IS dlil 10'8 HA 'ONOO @ Al C? LLJ U ZD c/� ¢ w U O LU w w Q P- 1.0-.8 1.0-.c ¢ = 8 ..E l A -,Z w A � oC-1 O Q z O Q o LLJ LU U U 8 z z Q w C/) M C/) J C�6 O LLJ0 <Qo � >- z C-? _ U ¢ ¢ U 0 M o �> Q UU CMI 06 Cl? <0 Qd C111 �zp ¢ m o oz= NJ � Q ti � ~ z O w z w < z 2i z O Q L¢i w _ p < � -T J U O p U O U- Q o U Z U O Ll 0 O O Uco O C,� LL U z�= Q J U ¢ < LULU U J Z w¢cn p z ¢ w m ~z ~COCA ¢ wNM ��^ vJ LU CL j ~ LU W W = 0_ �_ C J U U U o� - o Q~ C/) w z w O z J Q W Y[L S0 Z U O= W w= O z d C-) O O� U C/) O U ¢ Md C/) 0 w ¢ z U J z ��/� �/J W 12HIM11 W ¢ Q J � m p J J Q o-z¢ O �- J<w¢ ..0-.8£ W ¢ U w z CD LU ¢ ¢ w J d Uj w w LU Cn bozo C/) CO O E cn c/) V) _ ~OZ O a C� CD ) C SO3w oZw � w ¢ z C/) Lu CD .6 5E CC) LLJ w w w � c/) CO JU w U LU — O~N CD "� Z - ~ U C/) I CO C3 m mac~/) o O =vwpz0 CD CD 0- ¢a Om UOw w O 2i on C9 w W W ¢ � � � � 9 J C/) CD >< W LU Lu Z O Z O OU C Caw ❑C C�) ~ C/) = OOYpcoQ U - C/) (/) N C/) O Z� J F.- CD z O Q 0 0 CD En CD = � - 0 z w O= z ���00� - WI ¢ �� ¢¢ W p¢ W W e CDJ —J LU L) O LL_ II - �p c� ocJn m wwo Lu J co w¢ U wmCD v)zv)�jv z W N C) OJ p C/) Lu z UJJ z ¢ O W L.JCCJOorC/)_ ~O C/) CD ¢ U CL = w ¢ 0 3N1�'�00 I U CV Om N :Lt' Q ��O� Q Z NMV Si Dd (� � ¢ . w w x _ Cn0¢� L,-, OwJO L_ w ¢ _ Q z 3: co w Z ¢ J J ¢ O J N W w W ¢ w I � C/) ¢ � LuLu � QJ z ��I OJ w = O m 0IN—Moold I X00 3N1� '�00 w v CDz < r - _o p w J C I =0-cn L_ Q z LU J ¢ ¢ J LL W 0 Q W ofC/)¢ WO Ow CL = J Z �_��� OJ w = O m ORN—Frloo J J = m C/ 0 LLJ z z w LLJ LLJ U I �C/)Q c3}� W J d LLJ O~ LLJ J LL_ = 0 o - J C--) w J Lu = Qm� 1HJ13H 3041d ., /4 8-A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I T I I I I I I I I 1H 'M .0- U Page 452 CD ONn 'dAibZ 0 U cn c I z J NV�d ]IS 0 cc=:)) Co LO 0 V- N dlil 10'8 HA 'ONOO @ Al C? RAO'ONOO @X ZD U O Q P- CD o w O Q z O Q 0-F-- U U Q w C/) M C/) J C�6 >- z C-? _ U ¢ ¢ U Boz M o �> Q O W W 06 Cl? <0 Qd C111 �zp oz= NJ � Q ti � ~ z O w < z 2i z O _ p < � -T J U U- Q o CD O Ll 0 O O Uco z�= Q J U ¢ < LULU U J Z w¢cn Q QOoC w m ~z ~COCA ¢ wNM ��^ vJ LU CL j ~ J LLJ O CL = w w W W = 0_ �_ C J U U U o� - o Q~ C/) w z w O z J Q W Z U O= W w= O z d C-) O O� U C/) O U ¢ Md C/) 0 w ¢ z Z-NMd ��/� �/J 0 cc=:)) Co LO 0 V- N z Q J n ry W J J Q CD z z Q W ry C7 Ll l O O 0 azz O Q O Q p > LLI W Q © U J ry Y Q O� o�cn J = m0� F- O :2O J OM< FMr/ a Q Z Ci 4 J O 10 + 3�h 0 Iq zIZ 0 --------bNEY GHT 10 u�ila _--------------ro — n — — — O a1° AYN3AR10 +iO n O M m N I�— O m VO� M -----n -- - o- -- 1M 1M L � Oi J O N �l. �J� �J r.:. as n n 000_ AVUhrda I�c� Page 453 zw LLJ wm< F -Q Qw ��LL O Q� OLLJ UU U U N LJiZ pU LL - LL W U- J LL- 0 0 2 W W W Z Z OJ O Q W W J LL- S F - i > 0 V) LL- -i (D > Q W W J F- LL- LL- LL -S F- N O ILJ Z d g 0 w Q > U zLdLd w a z J Ld 0 U Z d Q W W Q:f LLJ J LL- 0 Q W wLLJ �W W Q (n (n Q (n (n O F- z Z 00<LLJ00011,cha U0 z 0 w z 0 w w(n2� IIIIIIIIIIII zcnw3: J J J J J:2 W zcnLdLd cnLL z Q � 3: W LL- 0- L0- O W W O WONw O w w w Ld Q w0 0- W F - p 0 p Q OJ OJ 2 J W W U W U U J 0 0 z 0 z J Z CD U) L� L� � U H J Z 46 X W X Z z F- 0- w O J w Lu w Qch� w� Z w O O z »> Q 0 W W:2 z O Of m U U U z 0- P W U U F- Z O Ch W< X X X th � 0 0 0 0 Z M 0- U W W W w w 0- 0 D_ Q_ a Q p d d W 2 O El M M d l :1«00,t0.00N 1 N VAS I0 >o z 0 �m �o J L U Z x z m W OF z I I I I r—W I I I Co U I n 0 W O I1 W L N W W I- M a O W L� O co CO U o� ° > �_ 011� W- N � ¢ I W I r, I LA' I 0 to + O W N a z 0 V W V V z 0 V W J X W Li.l 0,-� r W W z 0 V W Ilemuaooj (q uwdLE S - 610E ^oN 90 uo Pa40ld wdSl S - 610E ^oN 60 .Pai{WR ;sod 6MP 5 S311nan 0NV 9NIGVd,\3GVd9 NOO\V9NOWV0(10 0HONVd Lb -19E\ S Of w > _o N w O z O V N W UU��? U J I�r7UU U o co �n I I I M WW ncD 1 1 1 CD 0 N a� C) C) U U V Lr) r,) r- c-4 o o O (D (D N N I I rn W Z Q OfY O a 3: F O = Q U1 z�� w Y Z �— r; u o> O O Cr( 3 �wwQ Q pY pWm� O Q O»2 W m W 0:� o cn cn cn U)") VAS W >o z 0 O Q �o J co 0 � U Z x z m W OF z I Ln I I r—W I I to + O W N a z 0 V W V V z 0 V W J X W Li.l 0,-� r W W z 0 V W Ilemuaooj (q uwdLE S - 610E ^oN 90 uo Pa40ld wdSl S - 610E ^oN 60 .Pai{WR ;sod 6MP 5 S311nan 0NV 9NIGVd,\3GVd9 NOO\V9NOWV0(10 0HONVd Lb -19E\ S Of w > _o N w O z O V N W UU��? U J I�r7UU U o co �n I I I M WW ncD 1 1 1 CD 0 N a� C) C) U U V Lr) r,) r- c-4 o o O (D (D N N I I rn W Z Q OfY O a 3: F O = Q U1 z�� w Y Z �— r; u o> O O Cr( 3 �wwQ Q pY pWm� O Q O»2 W m W 0:� o cn cn cn U)") W N a ° VAS W >o z IrN O Q �o w� co 0 � 0>- Z wa z m W OF z D 2� Ln O cn O cn I Y+ 0 U = N LdZ n 0 W O I1 W L � 1 W W I- ZU a O W L� C p O W~ CO p LiJ o� ° > 1M 011� r- 0 wO N Y W r- Z In C/) N 2 O M M O ; 0) c0 O Q U F— wQ —L- w� 4- T F- z in C () 00 W N a ° VAS N�O0 w F- a Y J Q � U C7 W ^ O a� LL: J z m W OF z Ln V O I Y+ 0 N `° n 0 W O I1 a F- � 1 Io- I- ZU a 0 ..c r QLO 0 0 0 o� ° W 1M J r- 0 in o N > U 4 N L L — 4- W C7 U (n ry VAS N�O0 w F- Y J Q � U C7 I ^ O a� w C) z m W OF M Ln ML O O N 0 n N a a a F- F Z I- N N 0 0 a 0 0 0 M W 1M J r- ^ in o N � r- Z In _1M_ CO,JO 7li�J N O M M O ; 0) c0 O F— 0 w —L- � 4- T W in C () W V J C: 0 0 a U � rn It rn 000 to 000 Q L- m m 2 p J� Z W ` / a LTJ �y 00 W DZ 0 a U) w 0 m 0 rn o i I- r m X 0 0 0 0 m Ln It r- 0 00 m 00 m 00 00 00 co m > U 4 N L L — 4- W C7 U (n ry VAS w F- Y J Q � U C7 I ^ O a� w C) z m W OF O —rn --------- —i— D U O W n N a a a F- —--- < COD O — -----� CO D U } 0 a V M �. N 1M J 4L ^ in o M Na Z C _ Q U _1M_ CO,JO 7li�J Q O M M O ; 0) F— 0 w —L- � 4- T W in C () W V J C: 0 0 a U C O C U U cr E 0 a U m U U m C C E O U o L- L �Q) p Z (3 ) =3 Q L- m cc G I U w0 M > U 4 N L L — 4- W C7 U (n ry �� VAS w F- Y J Q � U C7 I ^ O a� w C) z m W OF O —rn --------- —i— D U O W n N a a a F- —--- < COD O — -----� CO ^ M 00 } 0 a V M �. N 1M J ^ in o M Na Z m ^ M M Jed _1M_ CO,JO 7li�J O M M O ; 0) F— mw WF Z " ' W W V J U X= W qj W J W Q LW p J� Z W ` / a LTJ �y 00 W DZ 0 a U) m D X w Ld Q U_ U X �� VAS 1hbASalDl7--------------- ----� I ^ O a� O----------------------- OF O —rn --------- —i— ap ap M i` W a a 1hCNS SID — —--- < COD O — -----� CO ^ M ^ } a V M �. 1M 1M J ^ in o M Na 7� _ O1 aO,W CO ^^ m O a0 00? �?JJ1� JNd J Vl��a �LL m ^ M M Jed _1M_ CO,JO 7li�J < O h M M O ; 0) MF J Q U N O 0 Z O LL. a W Q W cr 0 1..0 V W J W W oI U O U 0) N co r -- co -j J a' O (6 a co O C/) 0- L co O co O U D T U '� > 0) U I� :�i > U (n Q L O L 0) cu.E _ OO co N 07070 (6 C o m W' C a '� O a) YYpOp _0co ca�cn 0 O c LL (6 C) cu J 0 .� E coCU L Q 3: O U > a)pU�m L \ O °)"�- E E \ \� C 0 O coa) �> C) Z3 0U �� LLL c9 O .0. O LL O >—i O 0 N 0 0 (1)0 Qco (1) (1)J co (6 o O J 2 J 7- 7- O O U 0 O_Z •— coCDCD O E N c a) — O = — c c > O_ 0) 0 X N O L M M C O O •FU ( O O O N 0) C N cu co O O O O O O Z 0� D 0 LU p LU OU z O :;T W <'') E W U U j Z J xLL Q Z� OU M M N N N N N 9 LLI LLI 00 + W D 0 LU2 U Cn z ^J I..L n W U z 0 U P• � C MCod N m L Co LL O X D E T oa U CO Q \ T C � O L O_ X � � OL a U O U U X0 -0 O 0 0) O >. mJa-X 0 O U O U 0) O 0 co M M a' O (6 a co X C/) 0- L co O co O U D T U '� > 0) D m L O O 'j m I� :�i > U (n Q L O L 0) cu.E _ OO co N 07070 (6 C o m W' C a '� O a) YYpOp _0co ca�cn 0 O c LL (6 C) cu J 0 .� E coCU L Q 3: O U > a)pU�m L \ O °)"�- E E \ \� C 0 O coa) �> C) Z3 0U �� LLL c9 O .0. O LL O 0) O - co- O 0 N co > O Q E O c0 0 O_ O_ Qco IL L 2 U U E co (6 o O L O O = >+ FE o a= L - ca L>>' + U X '_ - � 0 O IL E\ O O U 0 O_Z •— coCDCD O E N c a) — O = — c c > O_ 0) 0 X N O L M M C O O •FU ( O O O N 0) C N cu co cz QQQQmU2�20av) ~ W D 0 LU2 U Cn z ^J I..L n W U z 0 U P• � C MCod N m L Co LL O X D E T oa U CO Q \ T C � O L O_ X � � OL a U O U U X0 -0 O 0 0) O >. mJa-X 0 O 0) C 0 co O � a' O (6 W X La r L co W E O (O/) U O T O 3), (� > Q v' L jn � m m -0 (n O O ` a LL c6 > m I--\ 0 > (� Hca coCU L Q 3: O U > a)pU�m L \ O °)"�- E E \ \� C 0 O 0 C 0 N CO L LL (n cc N LL a) O Y 0 O U =) 00 O (6 \ Q W co EN O (6 (6 O Q E O c0 0 O_ O_ .s .— 0 0 IL L 2 U U o LL U U c6 c6 O c6 :— i O -0 X E W > > O N N � .c6 c6 c6 c6 — = L (n > > (n N QQU����U)U) L O m N N O Q O L � co J 7 N L L a L CO N O a_ 47 coo > L T O O N L O L N E N \O N O U -0 U U C > 7 o O W rZ3 00 OaCo N Q U p W J 0 O XN O O co m E p) (n > N O L l (D X ':)):E J O U) E \ -(03) \ J � U cN N J a) X 0) 2 O � U E � U ] X0 O CO L CH C X Z3O Z3 0) O >. m J Q� X ++++++++ o ++++++++ J 0 LUU Cn W 0 z LUU W ryW NW 0. E 2E IONV JVIIO 'NIW ,8 0 W O � p W LL COLU W N O W W z — Q O a F -- Lf ) m 0Go w J Z > = cn O a' � O Q 0 LU 0 W LL =) 00 LU LU Q W � U � O LU W O W W W > m O Q > U O U D o >� >_ ~ elf J 0� D 0 LU p LU Z LU z O :;T W <'') E W U U j Z J xLL Q Z� OU M UCO O U LU Z H W X ~ W W Q z W zW~ F15W 00 LU J O Q z 1 O0 ~ Z =oar Cl) =>-a CO 0 LU ` E IONV JVIIO 'NIW ,8 0 W W N 0 N J J z — a F -- Lf ) m J Z W Z � O 0 X LL =) 00 LU z Cl) Z elf a z a W W W WF LL< a Lu Lu D >� >_ ~ elf J < 0 LL U Z LU ALJ (' W J [IfW a Q Z H Z O W CD a QCO z zW~ F15W 00 LU U) a Q z 1 ~ Z =oar Cl) =>-a 0 LU Cl)��� > m W Z % ` Of H O Z ¢ U W = (n p J W ' ` v w0� � 0 ��0 a ry W J Ury Q Q w a LLJ z O oOf wLij w = J ~J a amp0 0 f O 0ZQ _O _ LL ao W LN Z W_w0 W Q = W_ H HD 0U` � U) LU aOz Cl) W LLJ LU a m C� a a OfLu LLJ LU LTL I X00 a m OOw Z U 0 0 Z U) N M C) W U a o' w El - :5 F a U w w °O ~ J W Ld U � a w w 0° w a_ F2 O ~ � a w Q m -i -i W W �� (f)U) W W m m N r -O X X N -14- 73 0 ry W LU J m a J_ a a U J W' W O 0 LU 0 LU ry U) LL ry LU a J M a LU LU U o W Cir- o ON Q00 W L7 r a CO Q� \,- LU ry H 0 J = nry H Q w SNOISIAI?l OtO-9N (606)-9-1 [TL[fiF:7 lunrrs7irl7 - £99t -9Z9 (6061 "Id 'KL�6bO VONOnvonoOHONV2J x Z9ZO-9,V9-Z99 :Hd Q� Cfi suoyinlog-Wuzn.tasun� xaYe� 2g a�gruielsng Supml� W I Nb'� HS l�b'1NO 3 f1 N3/fib' NV03d 9V99 N o � r �� :�r_ ������ E � {=l.r ��r 'OVLO6 ` O `HOVDO IVDS 1N3 NdOl3A3(l 3nN3AV NV03d � o z vv SUOITAUi NZ 09v �iiins AAAA 1 ]Vd OHON`d l 410 01.00 :1N3wdM3A]Ga3SOdO2ld z =LL] JLl- :�OdOTIAIG NV�d DdVOSa NVQ A� J`dN I IN MIS Jd :�,lll l��Hs o m L ry U co X >, N E O O O N O L 0 co m H � �i O 'O m C)U N C m (n L N rO/L L U L L H O a) � U J U .T \ U) O N O C L � 2 �5 O U E O i 0 > ( N O E ��-� +�. O a co Co U E U N U W -i Q J I M U Q U U) O >, M O N E U N O U C/) Q� O O (o >, O O_ C U L m Y (6 C � c6 O d N a +. O C�U 75) L 0 c m c 60 E O O 0 7 N U O .O L U c a) ca O O .Q O_ (n m .n E L :3 co (6 = O co (� UO O U U (6 >+ O Q) co 0 0— E U \ \ N L.L Q Q N (cu c6 E U � O O 0 - LL LL _o X X O (n ( U w= W U F--ry cn Q w m M W �n x O co a_ Page 454 U) J Q LLI D LLI ryH ry 6j U) U) U; Q J J LU ryH 0 H Q d 1 Ix d f1 N 3AV N `d0 3 d Axaxw ^N W lF O 00 O IONV JVIIO 'NIW ,8 0 W w= W U F--ry cn Q w m M W �n x O co a_ Page 454 U) J Q LLI D LLI ryH ry 6j U) U) U; Q J J LU ryH 0 H Q d 1 Ix d f1 N 3AV N `d0 3 d Axaxw ^N W lF O 00 O 0 N N (D — -,- i 1 N I fit • 1S 1 ` AV Fri Mir Fri ol rt f AW .0 4$,IP ` 00 -wag SAM. Al '� +F'►f++ f � � �k to •�• r •ate 1 r AD44 1p so A �► `, IF y op alit 0 rot I . & *Ow p I4 4 *1 rti �v L f ~ , rJ , S•.:a r or vp iot lii a" t 3 Norrjo41•y yam. r - '� _ . , It AO r' A00, }4 r• AI 04k A Y I ■ e. i - tti `r �� 4 -tib f Pr. ~■ / i -1 • �� _ it � � .tib . µ .��'.�� �' �� 1 � + �.1 •_ - I• a•'t� • .. c� �.•:+ _ } - �_ � •y�.� - � �� � •l, .. 1 • �? `fit � ► - r- � ! .� •. � -Page 455 i j Q 4 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY- A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects. Site Characteristics: The project site is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building that includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area and 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor and an additional 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. The front, or primary, elevation of the building will be oriented towards Pecan Avenue, with the office area located at the southwest corner of the building. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction, with each facade painted a palette of five colors. Metal cladding and extensive glazing will accent the office area with a sandblast finish and high windows accenting the other elevations. Building popouts are proposed on the north and south elevations to provide visual interest. The required 500 square foot employee outdoor eating area will be located along the south property line and will include a metal lattice shade cover, multiple dining tables, and a trash receptacle. The loading area, dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building and will be screened from public view by the building. The site will be accessed by two driveways, one located adjacent to the north property line and one located to the south property line, with vehicle parking located along the west and south sides of the building. Eight -foot -high block walls along with view obscuring wrought iron gates will screen the dock areas from public view. An 8 -foot high wrought iron fence is proposed along the south property line, which is shared with truck storage lot to the south. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, Exhibit C Page 456 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Parcel General Industrial General Industrial GI District North Industrial Building, Single- Family Residences General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District East Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial GI District West Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building that includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area and 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor and an additional 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. The front, or primary, elevation of the building will be oriented towards Pecan Avenue, with the office area located at the southwest corner of the building. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction, with each facade painted a palette of five colors. Metal cladding and extensive glazing will accent the office area with a sandblast finish and high windows accenting the other elevations. Building popouts are proposed on the north and south elevations to provide visual interest. The required 500 square foot employee outdoor eating area will be located along the south property line and will include a metal lattice shade cover, multiple dining tables, and a trash receptacle. The loading area, dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building and will be screened from public view by the building. The site will be accessed by two driveways, one located adjacent to the north property line and one located to the south property line, with vehicle parking located along the west and south sides of the building. Eight -foot -high block walls along with view obscuring wrought iron gates will screen the dock areas from public view. An 8 -foot high wrought iron fence is proposed along the south property line, which is shared with truck storage lot to the south. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, Exhibit C Page 456 DRC COMMENTS DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY December 17, 2019 Page 2 parking, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following tables: Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed building design and site plan layout. The project complies with all Development Code requirements including parking, building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage. The proposed building design uses varied building materials including extensive glazing at the office corner, sandblasted tower elements, and a varied color palette. The project site is well-designed for the proposed warehouse distribution land use, with the dock high doors screened from public view by the building. Adequate parking is provided for employees, visitors, and trailers. An outdoor eating area is provided adjacent to the south property line with a metal overhead trellis shade structure along with multiple picnic tables. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. Page 457 Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback (Side) 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback (Rear) 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes * 35 Feet at Minimum Setback (1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed building design and site plan layout. The project complies with all Development Code requirements including parking, building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage. The proposed building design uses varied building materials including extensive glazing at the office corner, sandblasted tower elements, and a varied color palette. The project site is well-designed for the proposed warehouse distribution land use, with the dock high doors screened from public view by the building. Adequate parking is provided for employees, visitors, and trailers. An outdoor eating area is provided adjacent to the south property line with a metal overhead trellis shade structure along with multiple picnic tables. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. Page 457 Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parkin Office Parking 8,000 SF 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces Ware se Ware Warehouse Parking 1:1,000 for 1 It20,000 SF 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces 5 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking (10 Dock High Doors) 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed building design and site plan layout. The project complies with all Development Code requirements including parking, building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage. The proposed building design uses varied building materials including extensive glazing at the office corner, sandblasted tower elements, and a varied color palette. The project site is well-designed for the proposed warehouse distribution land use, with the dock high doors screened from public view by the building. Adequate parking is provided for employees, visitors, and trailers. An outdoor eating area is provided adjacent to the south property line with a metal overhead trellis shade structure along with multiple picnic tables. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. Page 457 DRC COMMENTS DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY December 17, 2019 Page 3 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4 -foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. 4. All wrought iron fences and sliding gates shall be painted black and include view obscuring metal backing. 5. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 6. All doors (roll -up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 7. Provide durable street furniture in the outdoor employee eating area, such as tables, chairs, and waste receptacles. 8. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented for final review. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Page 458 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams x Tony M. Guglielmo Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca x Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY- A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building Page 1 of 3 Page 459 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development Projects. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00381 — KEN KANG — A request for site plan and architectural review for the reconstruction and expansion of a service station and convenience store located in the Mixed -Use (MU) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, at 8166 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0207-112-20 and 23. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00936. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 — ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018- 00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved with the Committee recommending that stone veneer be added to the carwash building tower elements on the east elevation. The Committee was also accepting of the use of "alumawood" on the trellis structures rather than real wood and not requiring stone veneer to be added to the bases of the vacuum canopies. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. Page 2 of 3 Page 460 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. ADJOURNMENT 7:45pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, December 12, 2019 at least seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 Page 461 RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229- 171-02. A. Recitals. 1. Shean Kim, on behalf of Xebec Realty, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2019-00590 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of February 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on February 12, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property generally located on the east side of Pecan Avenue, south of Arrow Route; and b. The subject property is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage and maintenance yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 462 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 2 d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical forwarehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis forthe building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Parcel General Industrial General Industrial GI District North Industrial Building, Single- Family Residences General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical forwarehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis forthe building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback (Street) 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback (Side) 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback (Rear) 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes *35 Feet at Minimum Setback (1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Page 463 Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parking Office Parking (8,000 SF) 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces Warehouse Parking Ware Ware se 1:1,000 for 1St 20,000 SF 5 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking 10 Dock High Doors 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Page 463 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 3 a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Industrial Park (IP) District, which permits the development and operation of a warehouse/distribution building of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Ganddini Group; August 8, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The project site is presently being used by a truck repair and storage operation which generates an estimated 242 daily vehicle trips. The proposed warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 237 daily trips or a 5 -trip reduction from current conditions Based on the reduction in daily trips, it was determined that the Page 464 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 4 project was below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Recon; August 16, 2019) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds and no mitigation measures were necessary. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Recon: August 21, 2019) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (CA Engineering, Inc.; November 5, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (WRA; August 2019) was prepared for the project site. The project site does not include any natural habitats and is surrounded by development. The BRA determined that the project site does not contain drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands or riparian habitats that would be under the jurisdiction of federal, state or local agencies. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The BRA does recommend a nesting bird survey prior to grading if vegetation removal takes place during the bird nesting period (February 1 to August 31). The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Page 465 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 466 RANCHO CUCAMONGA Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Submit a nesting bird survey prior to earth moving activities if vegetation removal takes place during the bird nesting period (February 1 to August 31). 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 467 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 11. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 18. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. in public maintenance areas, the through the principles of water www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 2 of 15 Page 468 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 20. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 21. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 22. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 23. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 24. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. 1. Pecan Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: A. Provide sidewalk, curb & gutter, drive approaches, and signing & striping in accordance with City Standards. (Along entire frontage of property line on Whittram Ave.) B. Provide LED street lights as required. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Provide 2 new streetlights with new pedestal location to be coordinated with SCE {Whittram ). Streetlights on industrial collectors are to be spaced approximately 120 feet apart staggered on either side of roadways, please reference the Rancho Cucamonga subdivision guidelines for streetlight standards. 2. Development is within Area 10 of the Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. APN 229-171-02 is required to pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee at the time of grading or building permits for the parcels. Any subdivision, merger of parcels, or creation of new parcels within these mentioned APNs will be required to pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee for the area. Payment of the Area 10 Drainage Fee shall satisfy the applicants obligations under the Area 10 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 3 of 15 Page 469 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. The Development Impact fees due prior to Building Permit issuance. 4. Underground 2 Distribution Poles on Frontage along Pecan Ave; Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street. a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developers expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on opposite sides of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite of the street from the project The Developer shall pay a fee to the City for one-half the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street The Developer shall comply with Section 1 above and be eligible for reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street." 5. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 total feet on Pecan Avenue 7. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official. 8. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 4 of 15 Page 470 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign -Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project is required to annex into the following districts: LMD 3B, SLD 1 & SLD 6. Additionally, this property needs to be annexed into the Fire Protection Service CFD 85-1. Please contact Kelly Guerra at (909) 774-2582 to annex into CFD 85-1. 12. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 13. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: Pecan Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Other Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 5 of 15 Page 471 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 15. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 6 of 15 Page 472 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legenc public landscape plans are required, tree installation landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Pecan Avenue Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia hybrid `Muskogee' Common Name: Crape Myrtle Min. Grow Space: 20 -feet Spacing: 20 -feet on center Size: 15 -gallon minimum size Quantity: To be determined during design and standards as follows. The completed on the title page of the street improvement item within the construction legend stating: on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where in those areas shall be per the public Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 18. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: Pecan Avenue 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 7 of 15 Page 473 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of CA published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. Accessible restroom facilities is required as per the current edition of the California Plumbing Code. Accessible EV charging stations are required as per the current edition of the California Green Code. If there is any plumbing work on your plans please contact CVWD ASAP (Local water district), their turnaround timeline is 4-6 weeks to grant a plumbing first release. A "Plumbing First Release" is required before B&S issues a demolition or TI permit when there is plumbing involved. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 8 of 15 Page 474 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 9 of 15 Page 475 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Pecan Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required street improvement plans. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project shall use topographic elevations based on a City benchmark. 23. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 10 of 15 Page 476 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24.A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 25. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 26. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. 27. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 28. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 11 of 15 Page 477 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 35. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 36. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 37. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 12 of 15 Page 478 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 40. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 41. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 42. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 43. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 44. The direction of storm water flow flowing across the permeable paver storm water treatment device is a small area compared to the total area of each of the permeable paver locations. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a design which will allow the storm water to evenly flow into the permeable paver gravel base (such as a catch basin with a perforated pipe running under the length of the permeable paver area, or a similar design), and shall show the design on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing how the storm water is evenly distributed into the permeable paver gravel base. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 13 of 15 Page 479 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 14 of 15 Page 480 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section www.CityofRC.us Printed: 1/23/2020 Page 15 of 15 Page 481 Conditional Use Permit Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2019-00590 I, , as applicant for Design Review DRC2019-00590, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2019-00590, for property located on the east side of Pecan Avenue; APN: 0229-171-02, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 12, 2019 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval The applicant shall sign this Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity indicating agreement with and acceptance of the adopted Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All other conditions of approval related to Design Review DRC2019-00590. Resolution of Approval No. 20-15. Page 482 RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND 1N THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OFARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0229- 171-02. A. Recitals. 1. Shean Kim, on behalf of Xebec Realty, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2019-00590 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of February 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing on February 12, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property generally located on the east side of Pecan Avenue, south of Arrow Route; and b. The subject property is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage and maintenance yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Page 483 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 2 d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis for the building will be aligned west to east, The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: Land Use Provided General Plan Zoning 25 Feet 70 Feet Site Vacant Parcel 5 Feet General Industrial General Industrial(GI) Building Setback Rear District North Industrial Building, Family Residences Single- General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Trucking Firm 25 Feet General Industrial General industrial GI District East Warehouse Building Floor Area Ratio General Industrial General Industrial (GO District West Trucking Firm Yes General Industrial General Industrial GI District d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis for the building will be aligned west to east, The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback Side 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback Rear 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes *35 Feet at Minimum Setback 1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is required to provide 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Page 484 Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Office Parking 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces 8,000 SF Warehouse Parking 1:1,000 for 1�tl 20,000 SF 1:2,000 for 2 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces (95,945 SF) 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking 10 Dock High Doors 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Page 484 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 3 a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are Industrial Park (IP) District, which permits the development and operation of a warehouse/distribution building of the proposed size and configuration. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed in order to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Ganddini Group; August 8, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The project site is presently being used by a truck repair and storage operation which generates an estimated 242 daily vehicle trips. The proposed warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 237 daily trips or a 5 -trip reduction from current conditions Based on the reduction in daily trips, it was determined that the Page 485 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 4 project was below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Recon; August 16, 2019) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds and no mitigation measures were necessary. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and Green House Gas Analysis (Recon: August 21, 2019) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (CA Engineering, Inc.; November 5, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (WRA; August 2019) was prepared for the project site. The project site does not include any natural habitats and is surrounded by development. The BRA determined that the project site does not contain drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands or riparian habitats that would be under the jurisdiction of federal, state or local agencies. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The BRA does recommend a nesting bird survey prior to grading if vegetation removal takes place during the bird nesting period (February 1 to August 31). The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff s determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020. PLANNING COM ISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tonf Guglielmo, Chairman Page 486 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-15 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY February 12, 2020 Page 5 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga: do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of February 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: GUGLIELMO, OAXACA, DOPP, MORALES NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: WILLIAMS ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 487 Project #: Project Name.- Location: ame:Location: Project Type: Conditions of Approval Community Development Department DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Pecan XC Industrial 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Submit a nesting bird surrey prior to earth moving activities if vegetation removal takes place during the bird nesting period (February 1 to August 31). 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. www.CityofRC_us Printed W3/2020 Page 488 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 9. On comer side yards, provide minimum 5 -foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5 -foot walllfence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 10. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 11. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 13. If no centralized trash receptacles are provided, all trash pick-up shall be for individual units with all receptacles shielded from public view. 14. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 15. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15 -gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 16. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 17. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 18. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Pdnfed 1123/2020 www CityolRC.us in public maintenance areas, the through the principles of water Page 2 of 15 Page 489 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 20. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 21. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1 -foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 22. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 23. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 24. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions I . 1. Pecan Avenue frontage improvements shall be in accordance with City "Collector" standards as required and including: A. Provide sidewalk, curb & gutter, drive approaches, and signing & striping in accordance with City Standards. (Along entire frontage of property line on Whittram Ave.) B. Provide LED street lights as required. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide SCE power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Provide 2 new streetlights with new pedestal location to be coordinated with SCE (Whittram). Streetlights on industrial collectors are to be spaced approximately 120 feet apart staggered on either side of roadways, please reference the Rancho Cucamonga subdivision guidelines for streetlight standards. 2. Development is within Area 10 of the Etiwanda./San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. APN 229-171-02 is required to pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee at the time of grading or building permits for the parcels. Any subdivision, merger of parcels, or creation of new parcels within these mentioned APNs will be required to pay the Master Plan Drainage Fee for the area. Payment of the Area 10 Drainage Fee shall satisfy the applicants obligations under the Area 10 Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. www.CiryofRC_us Printed 1!2312020 page 3 of 15 Page 490 Project #: DRC2019-00590 ORC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineerinq Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. The Development Impact fees due prior to Building Permit issuance. 4. Underground 2 Distribution Poles on Frontage along Pecan Ave; Per Resolution No. 87-96: All developments, except those contained in section 7 and others specifically waived by the Planning Commission, shall be responsible for undergrounding all existing overhead utility lines including the removal the related supporting poles adjacent to and within the limits of a development as follows: 1. Lines on the project side of the street. a. Said lines shall be undergrounded at the developers expense. b. In those circumstances where the Planning Commission decides that undergrounding is impractical at present for such reasons as short length of undergrounding (less than 300 feet and not undergrounded adjacent), a heavy concentration of services to other users, disruption to existing improvements, etc., the Developer shall pay an in -lieu fee for the full amount per Section 6. c. The developer shall be eligible for reimbursement of one-half the cost of undergrounding from future developments as they occur on opposite sides of the street. 2. Lines on the opposite of the street from the project The Developer shall pay a fee to the City for one-half the amount per Section 6. 3. Lines on both sides of the street The Developer shall comply with Section 1 above and be eligible for reimbursement or pay additional fees so that he bears a total expense equivalent to one-half the total cost of undergrounding the lines on both sides of the street." 5. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 33 total feet on Pecan Avenue 7. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official. 8. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. printed 112312020 www CityolRC us Page 4 of 15 Page 491 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Enuineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. ** CD information Required Prior to Sign -Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and 1 or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 7744062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall 1 Engineering 1 Environmental Programs 1 Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 11. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project is required to annex into the following districts: LIVID 313, SLD 1 & SLD 6. Additionally, this property needs to be annexed into the Fire Protection Service CFD 85-1. Please contact Kelly Guerra at (909) 774-2582 to annex into CFD 85-1. 12. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 13. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: Pecan Avenue Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side -walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Other Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Printed 112312020 www Gityo Rc us Papa 5 of 15 Page 492 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 15. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3 -inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all comers of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed 1!2312(120 Page fi at 15 Page 493 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT.- Engineering ROJECT. Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Pecan Avenue Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia hybrid 'Muskogee' Common Name: Crape Myrtle Min. Grow Space: 20 -feet Spacing: 20 -feet on center Size: 15 -gallon minimum size Quantity: To be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 17. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 18. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: Pecan Avenue 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15 -gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions Printed:www.CityotRC us 1!23!2020 Page 7 of 75 Page 494 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures. Disabled access improvements to the site and building must be provided in accordance to the State of CA published thresholds at the time of plan check submittal. Accessible restroom facilities is required as per the current edition of the California Plumbing Code. Accessible EV charging stations are required as per the current edition of the California Green Code. If there is any plumbing work on your plans please contact CVWD ASAP (Local water district), their turnaround timeline is 4-6 weeks to grant a plumbing first release. A "Plumbing First Release" is required before B&S issues a demolition or TI permit when there is plumbing involved. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. Printed 112312020 www CityofRC.us Page S of 15 Page 495 Project #: Project Name: Location: Project Type: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Pecan XC Industrial 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 9. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Pian shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2 -foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 14. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 15. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100 -feet beyond project boundary. 16. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 17. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. Printed 1!23!2020 www QtyafRC,us Page 9 Of 15 Page 496 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 19. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Pecan Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required street improvement plans. 20. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.31CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.21CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.21CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 21. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 22. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the project shall use topographic elevations based on a City benchmark. 23. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading pian showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. Printed; 712312020 www CityofRC us Page 10 of 15 Page 497 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. A drainage study showing a 100 -year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall .contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12 -inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 25. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads and parking lot purposes, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. 26. DESIGN ISSUE: The conceptual grading and drainage plan shows an area within the parking lot and fire lane where storm water will be ponding. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the civil engineer of record shall submit a set of grading plans to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department Fire Construction Services to review the plans and provide a maximum ponding depth of the storm water retention. 27. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 28. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 29. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 31. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. Printed- 712312020 www CityO RC.Us Page 17 of 15 Page 498 Project *: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT., Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 32. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wellslunderground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 33. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 34. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 35. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Services Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Pian" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 36. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 37. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. Printed 1/23/2020 WWW CityofRC us Page 12 of 15 Page 499 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Project Type: Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VI1.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 40. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 41. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 42. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 43. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. 44. The direction of storm water flow flowing across the permeable paver storm water treatment device is a small area compared to the total area of each of the permeable paver locations. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a design which will allow the storm water to evenly flow into the permeable paver gravel base (such as a catch basin with a perforated pipe running under the length of the permeable paver area, or a similar design), and shall show the design on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing how the storm water is evenly distributed into the permeable paver gravel base. Printed: 1!23!2020 www CityofRC us Page 13 of 15 Page 500 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: Project Type: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Design Review Sign Permit Notice of T=iling ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Gradinq Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No - RB -2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Req ui rements). 8 (Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as '100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity(77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular(78) repair or maintenance activities(79), such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10 -feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050, 46. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106,5.3. www CilyofRC.us ai:nted 1123/2020 page 14 of 1; Page 501 Project #: DRC2019-00590 DRC2019-00591 Project Name: Pecan XC Industrial Location: Project Type: 8545 PECAN AVE - 022917102-0000 Design Review Sign Permit Notice of Filing ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT; Grading Section Printed 112312020 www.CilyofRC.us Page 15 of 1s Page 502 Conditional Use Permit Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2019-00590 1, , as applicant for Design Review DRC2019-00590, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2019-00590, for property located on the east side of Pecan Avenue; APN: 0229-171-02, Rancho Cucamonga, California, as adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga on February 12, 2019 and as listed below and attached. Applicant Signature Date Conditions of Approval The applicant shall sign this Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity indicating agreement with and acceptance of the adopted Conditions of Approval prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All other conditions of approval related to Design Review DRC2019-00590. Resolution of Approval No. 20-15. Page 503 BY HAND DELIVERY February 20, 2020 7 510-836-4200 1939 Harrison StreeE. Ste. 150 F 510.835.4205 Oakland. CA 94612 Mayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy Council Member Ryan Hutchison Council Member Kristine Scott Council Member Sam Spagnolo City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 council &.cityofrc.us www lozeaudrury,com rlchard@-[ozeaud rury.com RECEIVED FEB 2 0 2120 CITY CLERK CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMGNGA Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City. Clerk rr,CityofRC.us Re: Appeal of Decision of the Planning Commission Approving Site Plan and Architectural Review of DRC2019-00590 for the Xebec Realty Warehouse Distribution Building on APN 0229-171-02. Dear Mayor Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, Honorable Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo, and Ms. Reynolds: I am writing on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") and its members living and/or working in or around the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") regarding the Planning Commission's decision of February 12, 2020 to approve the site plan and architectural review for Design Review DRC2019-00590, a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building at APN 0229-171-02 ("Project"). This appeal is fled pursuant to Municipal Code section 17.14.070, is timely filed within 10 days of the Planning Commission's decision, and is accompanied by the required filing fee of $3,114. The reasons for the appeal are set forth in the attached letter, which was submitted to the Planning Commission prior to its decision. Sincerely, Richard Drury LDZEAU DRURY LLP Page 504 0 DRURYLLw; T 510,636.4200 F 510,836.4205 BY E-MAIL AND HAND DELIVERY February 11, 2020 Chainnan Guglielmo Vitae Chairman Oaxaca Commissioner Dopp Commissioner Morales Commissioner Williams Planning Commission c/o Anne McIntosh, Secretary City of Rancho Cucamonga 101500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 anne.mcintosh()cit ofrc.us 0 1939 Harrison Street, Ste. 150 www.lozeaLrdrury,com Oakland. CA 94612 richaro@lozeaudrury,corn Anne McIntosh, Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga I0500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 anne.mcintosh@cityofrc.us michael.smith &cit ofrc.us Tabe.vanderZwaa a7cit ofrc.us Re: Design Review No. DRC2019�00590: Objection to CEQA Exemption Dear Chainnan Guglielmo, Members of the Planning Commission, Ms. McIntosh, Mr. Smith, and Mr, van der Zwaag: I am writing on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") and its members living and/or working in or around the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") regarding the Xebec Realty warehouse distribution project, Design Review No. 2019- 001590, currently proposed for the parcel on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route, APN 0229-171-02 ("Project"). SAFER objects to the City's proposed Class 32 exemption from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). SAFER believes that the proposed Project is not exempt from CEQA review and that CEQA review is required to analyze and mitigate the Project's environmental impacts, including impacts on air quality, health risk, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Shean Kim for Xebec Realty, is requesting that the Planning Commission review and approve a proposed concrete tilt -up warehouse distribution building approximately 103,945 square feet. The warehouse includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area, 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor, and 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. The loading area, 10 dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building. The Project will also include 32 parking spaces for office parking and 47 spaces for warehouse parking. Page 505 0 0 DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 2 of 6 The project site is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue just south of Arrow Route. (APN: 0229-171-02). The project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial (GI). The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in -fell" project (Class 32). Ii. LEGAL STANDARD CEQA mandates that "the Iong-term protection of the environment ... shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions" throughout California. PRC § 21001(d). A "project" is "the whole of an action" directly undertaken, supported, or authorized by a public agency "which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment." PRC § 2I065; CEQA Guidelines, 14 CCR § 15378(a). For this reason, CEQA is concerned with an action's ultimate "impact on the environment." Bozung v. LAFCO (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283. CEQA requires environmental factors to be considered at the "earliest possible stage ... before [the project] gains irreversible momentum," Id. 13 Cal.3d at 277. "at a point in the planning process where genuine flexibility remains." Sundstrom v. Mendocino County (198 8) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 307. To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three -tiered structure. 14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles (2008) 16I Cal.AppAth 1168, 1185-86 ("Hollywoodland'). First, if project falls into an exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in question will not have a significant effect on the environment, no further agency evaluation is required. Id. Second, if there is a possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the agency must perform an initial threshold study. Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a). If the study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment the agency may issue a negative declaration. Id., 14 CCR §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070. Finally, if the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report ("EIR") is required. Id. Here, since the City exempted the Project from CEQA entirely, we are at the first step of the CEQA process. I. CEQA Exemptions. CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. 14 CCR §§ I5300, 15354. "Exemptions to CEQA are narrowly construed and "'[e]xemption categories are not to be expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language."' Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 CaI.4th 105, 125. The determination as to the appropriate scope of a categorical exemption is a question of law subject to independent, or de novo, review. San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist., [2006} 139 Cal. App. 4th 1356, 1375 ("[Qjuestions of interpretation or application of the requirements of CEQA are matters of law. (Citations.) Thus, for example, interpreting the scope of a CEQA exemption presents `a question of law, subject to de nova review by this court.' (Citations)." Page 506 0 DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 3 of 6 11 The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in -fill" project (Class 32). 2. Exceptions to CEQA Exemptions. There are several exceptions to the categorical exemptions. 14 CCR § 15300.2. At least two exceptions are relevant here: (1) Significant Effects. A project may never be exempted from CEQA if there is a "fair argument" that the project may have significant environmental impacts due to "unusual circumstances." 14 CCR § 15300.2(c). The Supreme Court has held that since the agency may only exempt activities that do not have a significant effect on the environment, a fair argument that a project will have significant effects precludes an exemption. Wildli je Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 204. (2) Cumulative Impacts. A project may not be exempted. from CEQA review "when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant." 3. Limitations to In -Fill Exemption. The Class 32 In-FiII exemption can only be applied when "Ctjhe project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species" or where "jajpproval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to trajjic, noise, air quality, or water quality." 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15332(c), (d). The CEQA analysis fails to properly analyze and mitigate impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. The analysis should be withdrawn, an Environmental Impact Report CUR") should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. M. ANALYSIS I. The Project may have Significant Environmental Impacts Related to Air Quality, Precluding Reliance on the Categorical Exemption. CEQA and its regulations provide that certain projects may be exempt, However, "/a/ft activity that may have a significant effect on the environnient cannot be categorically exempt." Salmon Protectors v. County of'Marin (2004) 125 Ca1.AppAth 1098, 1107; Azusa Laird Reclamation v. Main San Gabriel Basin (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1165, 1191, 1202, CEQA's unique "fair argument" standard applies when reviewing a CEQA exemption. Under the "fair argument" standard, an agency is precluded from relying on a categorical exemption when there is a fair argument that a project will have a significant effect on the environment. Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City oj'San Diego ("Bankers Hilf') (2006) 139 Cal. App, 4th 249, 266. In other words, "where there is any reasonable possibility that a project or Page 507 DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 4 of 6 activity may have a significant effect on the environment, an exemption would be improper." Id.; Dunn -Edwards Corp., 9 Ca1.AppAth at 654-655. a. The Project may have a Significant Impact to Human Health from Diesel Particulate Matter. The City's documents on the Project fail to evaluate or even mention the potential health risk from diesel particulate matter ("DPM") associated with the Project's construction and operation. By failing to prepare a construction or operational health risk assessment ("HRA") for existing sensitive receptors, the Project is inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment's ("OEHHA") most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual. )r Preparation of Health Disk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https:Hoehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. The OEHHA guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA, recommending that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. Id., p, 8-18. Given that the Project will require site preparation, grading, building construction and architectural coating for the new buildings, and paving throughout the site, it is reasonably assumed that the Project will last over two months. OEHHA guidance also recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than six months should be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR"). Id., pp. 8-6, 8-15. Even though the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the Project, it can reasonably be assumed that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore. the City should evaluate the project's health risk impacts from construction and operation per OEHHA guidelines. Environmental consulting fine SWAPE reviewed the Project and its associated documents and prepared a screening -level HRA in an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by the Project's construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening -level air quality dispersion model. Ex. A, pp. 3-7. SWAPE calculates that the Project's construction and operation may pose cancer risks to children and infants of approximately 25 and 100 in one million, well above the South Coast Air Quality Management District's ("SCAQMD") threshold of 10 in one million. Id., p. 6. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime calculated by SWAPE is 140 in one million, resulting in a potentially significant health risk impact. These screening level calculations demonstrate that the Project's construction and operational DPM emissions may result in a potentially significant health risk impact. SWAPE's screening -level HRA analysis and results can be found in Exhibit A, pp. 3-7. b. The Project may have a Significant Impact Related to Greenhouse Gases. The City's documents on the Project fail to demonstrate that the Project would result in less than significant air quality impacts, including greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. SWAPE Page 508 L� DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 5 of 6 0 analyzed the Project and its associated documents and prepared a screening level analysis of the Project's GHG emissions, which indicate a potentially significant impact. SWAPS used Project -specific information to quantify the Project's emissions using the California Emissions Model ("CalEEMod") output files. Ex. A, p. 8. SWAPE concluded that the Project's GHG emissions will include approximately 474.5 MT CO2e of total construction emissions and approximately 1,374.29 MT CO7elyear of annual operational emissions. Id. SWAPS then calculated the Project's service population in order to compare the Project's emissions with the SCAQMD's substantial progress service population efficiency threshold, concluding that the Project will emit approximately 34.75 .MT COzelSPlyear, which greatly exceeds the SCAQMD's 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e1SPlyear. Id. This exceedance of the SCAQMD's 2035 service population efficiency threshold therefore results in a significant impact, requiring an EIR in order to adequately assess and mitigation potential GHG impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. 2. The Project may have Significant Cumulative Impacts. As shown above, the construction and operation of a 103,945 square foot warehouse building is likely to create significant adverse air quality impacts related to construction equipment, and operational emissions from diesel trucks and other vehicles associated with the Project. The Project therefore may also have significant cumulative air quality impacts when considered together with the many other similar projects nearby. Review of the Project site and surrounding areas demonstrates that the Project is located within close proximity of over a dozen industrial facilities. These projects will have a significant cumulative impact when considered together with the proposed Project. Recognizing that several projects may together have a considerable impact, CEQA requires an agency to consider the "cumulative impacts" of a project along with other projects in the area. Pub. Resources Code §21083(b); CEQA Guidelines § 15355(b). If a project may have cumulative impacts, the agency must prepare an EIR, since "a project may have a significant effect on the environment if '[t] he possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable."' Communities for a Better Environment ti,. Calif.' Res. Agency, 103 Cal.App.4th at 98, 114; Dings County Farm Bur. v. City oJ'Hagford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 721. It is vital that an agency assess "`the environmental damage [that] often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources ... "' Bakersfield Citizens For Local Control v. City of Bakersreld (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1214. "[U]nder CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts. `If the local agency has failed to study an area of possible environmental impact, a fair argument may be based on the limited facts in the record. Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.' (Sandstrom v. County afMendocino (198 8) 202 Cal. App. 3d 296, 311; County Sanitation Disl. No. 2 v. County oJ' ern (2005) I27 Cal. App. 4th 1544) Page 509 0 DRC2019-00590 February 11, 2020 Page 6 of 6 IV. Conclusion For the above reasons, the CEQA Analysis for the Project and its reliance on the stated exemptions should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared, and the draft ETR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Richard Drury LDZEAU DRURY LLP Page 510 Exhi Page 51 0 0 S'WA P E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment February 10, 2020 Paige Fennie Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94612 Subject: Comments on the Xebec Warehouse Project Dear Ms. Fennie, 2656 29" Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhha emann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310) 795-2335 prosenfe ld @ swage. cam We have reviewed the December 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda ("D III for the Xebec Warehouse Project ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (-City"). The Project proposes to construct a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution {wilding as well as 79 parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces on the 4.75 -acre site. Our review concludes that the DR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's Air quality, Health Risk, and Greenhouse Gas impacts, As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. Our analysis, as described herein, demonstrates that there are potentially significant impacts that were not evaluated in the provided documents. An EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. As a result of ourindin s the Provosed Pro'ect does not oualifv for a Class 32 Exemption under the Cali ornia Environmental Quality Act "CE A" and 34 Cal. Code of Reqs. 3500 et se " A Guidelines" and there are a full CF anal sis must be prepared to ade uatel assess and miti ate the Potential air quality, health risk and greenhouse gas impacts that thePrn'ect may have on the surrounding environment. We recommend that the City prepare on environmental imp act re ortT-1-r- with a health risk assessment "HRA" as re aired under the Commerce Munici of Code "CMC" or "Code" Page 512 i 0 Air Quality Incorrect Reliance on Class 32 Categorical Exemption The DR claims that the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15332 (p. 001), According to CEQA Guidelines § 15332(d), a project can only qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption if "approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." However, the City fails to provide any quantified analysis of air quality, health risk, noise, or water quality impacts resulting from the Project's construction and operation, In addition, SWAPE's analysis demonstrates that their air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts may be potentially significant. As a result, the proposed Project fails to adequately evaluate and disclose potential air quality, health risk, noise, and water quality impacts that Project construction and operation may have on the surrounding environment. Thus, the Class 32 exemption is unsubstantiated, and an E I R should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. Diesel PartiCUlate Matter Health. Risk Emissions inadequately EvalUated Review of the Project documents demonstrates that the documents fail to evaluate or mention the potential health risk associated with Project activities. Without a health risk analysis (HRA), we cannot verify that Project -related impacts are less than significant. By failing to prepare a construction or operational HRA for existing sensitive receptors, the Project is inconsistent with recommendations set forth by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA"), the organization responsible for providing recommendations for health risk assessments in California. In February of 2015, OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, which was formally adopted in March of 2015.2 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Construction of the Project will produce emissions of diesel particulate matter ("DPM"), a human carcinogen, through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment. The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors.3 Although the Project documents fail to disclose the anticipated duration of construction, we can reasonably assume that it will last over two months, given the Project will require site preparation, grading, building construction and architectural coating for the new buildings, and paving throughout the site. Therefore, per OEHHA guidelines, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project construction be evaluated. Additlonally, once construction is complete, the Project will operate for a long period of time. During operation, the Project will generate vehicle and truck trips, which will produce additional exhaust emissions, thus continuing to expose nearby sensitive receptors to emissions. The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than six months should be evaluated far the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate ' CEQA Guidelines § 15332(c), available at: https:/Zresources.ca.gov/cega/guLdelineslartl9.html. a OEHHA (February 2015) Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments, htt s: oehha.c2-Rovlmedia/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. a 16id, p. 8-18. 2 Page 513 0 0 individual cancer risk forth e maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR").A Even though the Project documents fail to provide the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, we recommend that health risks from Project operation also be evaluated, as a 30 -year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2 -month and 6 - month requirements set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent health risk policy, and as such, we recommend that an assessment of health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from construction and operation be included in an air quality impact evaluation for the Project. Furthermore, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified HRA for nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction and operation, the DR fails to compare the excess health risk to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of ten in one millions Thus, the Project cannot conclude less than significant air quality impacts resulting from Project construction and operation without quantifying emissions to compare to the proper threshold. Screening -Leel Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by Project construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening -level HRA. The results of our assessment, as described below, demonstrate that the Project may result in a significant impact. In order to conduct our screening -level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.' The model replaced SCREENS, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA' and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated (CAPCOA)' guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. if an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a SWAP CaIEEMod model for the Project, using the Project -specific information provided by the DR. We included half of the warehouse land use as refrigerated warehouse no -rail and half as unrefrigerated no - rail, as the warehouse type was not specified by the DR. We also included 500 square feet of other non -asphalt surfaces to account fpr the 500 square foot outdoor eating area indicated by the DR, Finally, we included 237 daffy trips, as indicated by the DR (p. 4). All other values were left as defaults. Utilizing this model, we prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project's construction and operational health-related impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PM1a exhaust ' Ibid., p. 8-6, 5-15 s "South Coast AQM0 Air Quality Significance Thresholds." SCAQMD, April 2019, available at: htt www.a md. ou docs default -source ce a handbook sca and -air ualit -si nificance- thresholds. df?sfvrsn=2. 6 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, htt www.e a. ov ttn scram uidance clarification 20110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo. df ' Supra, fn 20. s CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.caucoa.org/wq content u loads 2012 03 CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09. df. 3 Page 514 0 0 estimates from the SWAPE annual CaIEEMod output files. Consistent with re corn men dations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. The Project's construction CaIEEMod output files indicate that construction activities will generate approximately 284 pounds of diesel particulate matter (DPM). The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: grams 284.4 lbs 453.6 grams I day 1 hour Emission Rate � } = x x x = 0.00357 gds second 418 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0,00357 grams per second (g/s). Subtracting the 418 -day construction duration from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction the MEIR would be exposed to the Project's operational DPM for an additional 28.85 years, approximately. The Project's operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 28 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation: grams 27.8 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Hate � } = x x x = 0. 0004gds second 365 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.0004 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 4.75 -acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of 148 meters by 97 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. An urban meteorological setting was selected with model -default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single -hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single -hour concentration by 10%.9 According to the ❑R, there are single family residences to the north of the Project site (DR, p. 001). Review of Google Earth demonstrates that these sensitive receptors are less than 25 meters from the edge of the Project site. However, the maximally exposed receptor is not always the closest receptor. Thus, the maximum single -hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction is approximately 6.142 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.6142 µg/m3 for Project 9 "Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." EPA, 1992, available at: htt www.e a. ov ttn scram u Ida ncelguide EPA -454R-92-019 OCR. pdf; see also "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, Available at: htt s: oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr 2015 uidancemanual.pdf, p, 4-36 4 Page 515 ! 9 construction at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor. For Project operation, the single -hour concentration is estimated by AERSCREEN is approximately 0.6875 µg/m3 at approximately 100 meters downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.06875 µg/m3 for Project operation at the maximally exposed sensitive receptor. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the maximally exposed residential receptors using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by DEHHA and the 5CAQMD. Consistent with the default CaiEEMod construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and for 0.90 years of the infantile stage of life (0 — 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30 -year exposure period, including the remainder of the infantile stage of life, child stage of life (2 —16 years), and adult stage of life (16 — 30 years). Consistent with ❑EHHA, 5CAQMD, BAAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air poIIution.10- 11•'2.13 According to the above -referenced guidance, we recommend that the quantified cancer risk be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the infant stage of life (0 to 2 years) and multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 to 16 years). However, while we recommend this methodology as the most health -protective analysis, we also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older DEHHA guidance from 2003. This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by the 5CAQMD, the air quality district responsible for the City, and several other air districts in the state. In order to evaluate impacts most conservatively,we strongly recommend the use of age sensitivity factors as is recommended by the most recent guidance. Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by DEHHA, we used the 95`h percentile breathing rates for infants.11 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 10 "Risk Assessment Guideiines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." DEHHA, February 2015, available at: htt s: oehha.ca. ov media downloads crnr 2015 uidancemanual. df. 11 "Draft Environmental Impact Report (DDR) for the Proposed The Exchange (5CH No. 2018071058)." SCAQMD, March 2019, available at: htt www.a rrrd. ov docs default-source/cega/comment- letters 2019 march RVC190115-03. df?sfvrsn=8, p.4. 12 "California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines." BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: http.,//www.baaqmd.govmedia files lannin -and-research ce a ce a guidelines ma 2017 df. df?la=en, p. 56; see also "Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards." BAAQMD, May 2011, available at: http://www.baagmd.P,Ovl-Zmedia/Files€'lannin %20and%2oResearch CE A BAA MD%20 Model ing%2OApp roac h.ashx. p. 65, 86, 13 "Update to District's Risk Management Policy to Address 0EHHA's Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document." SJVAPCD, May 2015, available at: httr)s://www.valIL- air.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pd , p. 8, 20, 24. '" "Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act," June 5, 2015, available ot: htt www,a md, ov docs default -source lannin risk- assessmentlab2588-risk-assessment.guideiines.pdf?sfvrsn=6. p. 19. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments," DEHHA, February 2015, ovoilable at: htt s: foehha.ca.eov/media/downioadslcrnrl2(]15uidancemanual.pdf 5 Page 516 0 0 (mg/kg -day)-' and an averaging time of 25,550 days. QEHHA recommends that a 30 -year exposure duration be used as the basis for estimating cancer risk at the MEIR.15 Consistent with 0 E H H A guidance, exposure to the M E I R was assumed to begin in the third trimester of pregnancy to provide the most conservative estimate of air quality hazards. Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home (FAH) Value of 1 for the 3rd trimester and infant rece ptors. " The results of our calculations are shown in the table below. Operation 14.00 0.06875 The Maximally Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Adult Exposure _ Adult 14.00 Duration 2.8E-06 2.8E-06 Exposure Breathing Cancer Exposure 34.00 2 ZE-05 lifetime 1.4E-04 Activity Duration Concentration Rate (l/kg- Risk ASF Cancer Risk (years) (ug/m3) without with A5Fs* day) A5Fs* Construction 0.25 0.6142 361 8.4E-07 10 8.4E-06 3rd Trimester 3rd Duration 0'25 8.4E-07 Trimester 8.4E-06 Exposure Construction 0.90 0.6142 1090 9.0E-06 10 9.0E-05 Operation 1.10 0.06875 1090 1.2E-06 10 1.2E-05 Infant Exposure Infant Duration 2'00 1.0E -D5 Exposure 1 -OE -04 Operation 14.00 0.06875 572 8.3E-06 3 2.5E-05 Child Exposure Child Duration T4.� 8 3E-06 Exposure 2'E-05 Operation 14.00 0.06875 261 2.8E-06 1 2.8E-06 Adult Exposure _ Adult 14.00 Duration 2.8E-06 2.8E-06 Exposure Lifetime Exposure 34.00 2 ZE-05 lifetime 1.4E-04 Duration Exposure * We, along with CARS and SCAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 QEHHA guidance, which includes A5Fs. As indicated in the table above, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the maximally exposed residential receptor, located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing age sensitivity factors, are approximately 2.8, 25, 100, and 8.4 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the maximally exposed residential receptor, utilizing age sensitivity factors, is approximately 140 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, utilizing age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the ❑R, Utilizing age sensitivity factors is the most conservative, health -protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by 0EHHA and 15"Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments." QEHHA, February 2015, available at: https-.//oehha.ca.gov media down!pads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-6. 16 "Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212." SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: httP.Wwww.agmd,sov/docs/defauIt-sou rcelrule-book/Proposed- Rules 1401 riskassessment rocedures 2017 080717, df, p. 7. 0 Page 517 • 0 recommendations from the air district. Results without age sensitivity factors are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis, Regardless, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the maximally exposed residential receptor, located approximately 100 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without age sensitivity factors, are approximately 2.8, 8.3, 10, and 0.84 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the maximally exposed residential receptor, without age sensitivity factors, is approximately 22 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, without age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the DR. While we recommend the use of age sensitivity factors, health risk impacts exceed the SCAQMD threshold regardless, Failure to Consider Cumulative Impacts The DR fails to evaluate the cumulative impacts resulting from nearby industrial land uses. As a result, the cumulative risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors to the Project in conjunction with the surrounding existing sources of toxic air contaminants ("TAC(s)"] is unknown. Therefore, the proposed Project may result in a significant air quality impact that has not been previously identified a addressed, According to CECIA Guidelines § 15355, "Cumulative impacts' refers to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts." CEQA Guidelines § 15054(h)(1) goes onto say, "... the lead agency shaII consider whether the cumulative impact is significant and whether the effects of the project are curnu itively considerable. An E1R must be prepared if the cumulative impact may be significant and theproject's incrementol effect, though individ ually limited is cumulatively considerable. 'Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the a ects OLpast projects, the effects of other current projects, and the e ects Of robableuture ro'ects," (Emphasis added), Thus, the proposed Project may result in a cumulatively considerable impact when considered in conjunction with nearby industrial facilities. Review of the Project site on Google Earth demonstrates that the proposed Project is located in close proximity to the Goodman Logistics Center, Heartland Express trucking, Acra Machinery, an ARCO gas station, Legend Transportation trucking, T & R Lumber, Crux Truck Parts, DP Rancho Cucamonga DC distributing, UFF T Truck & Trailer Repair, South Bay International, Inc. manufacturing, Pacific Coast Recycling, Aguilar Trucking, Vista Metals Corporation, and more. Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed Project will occur in conjunction with the operation of these other existing industrial facilities, As a result, and prior to Project approval, we recommend the cumulative health risk be evaluated for sensitive receptors near the proposed Project, Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate the Project's Greerihouse Gas Impacts As discussed above, the DR and associated documents fail to demonstrate that the Project would result in less than significant air quality and health risk impacts. Thus, the DR's claim that the Project is exempt I►► Page 518 0 0 pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 153321d) should not be relied upon. As a result, an EiR should be prepared evaluating the Project's potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Thus, we have prepared a screening level analysis of the Project's GHG emissions that indicates a potentially significant GHG impart, as shown below. Screening Level Analysis Indicates a POtelitially Significant GHG Impact Applicable thresholds and modeling demonstrate that the proposed Project will result in a potentially significant impact not previously identified or addressed by the DR. The CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAP utilizing Project -specific information as disclosed in the DR, quantify the Project's emissions, which include approximately 474.5 MT CO2e of total construction emissions and approximately 1,374.29 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions (sum of area, energy, mobile, waste, and water -related emissions). In order to compare the Project's emissions with the SCAQMD's substantial progress service Population efficiency threshold of 3.0 MT COze/SP/year, we calculated the Project's service population. According to CAPCOA's CEQA & Climate Change report, a service population is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project."17 As the Project is has no residential land uses, we assumed a residential service population of zero. Assuming that the Project would include a warehouse land use, we calculated a service population of 40 employees based on SCAG's Employment Density Study Summary Report for San Bern adino. 18 When dividing the Project's GHG emissions by a service population value of 40 people, we find that the Project would emit approximately 34,75 MT COze/SP/year."This exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, as well as the inapplicable SCAQMD 2020 efficiency target of 4.8 MT CO2e/SP/year. SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Project Phase Project (MT CO2e/year) Construction (amortized over 30 years) 15.82 Area 0.01 Energy 857.20 Mobile 335.16 Waste 49.13 Water 132,79 Total 1,390.11 Service Population 40 17 CAPCOA (Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71.72, htt www.ca coa.or w -content u loads 2012 03 CAPCOA-White-Paper.ndf. 18 Service Population = Residents + Employees = 0 + 40 = 40; Employees = (103,945 square feet) _ (2,616 square feet per em pioyee) = approximately 40 employees, see "Employment Density Study Summary Report." SCAG, October 2001, available at: htt s: Www.goagle-comlurl?a=httv://www mwco .orglfile.aspx?A%3D TTITR24PO000lw5mPNzKBF4dRd'c41e41 F9Exi6lXOU%253D&sa=D&source=han outs&ust=1581123997890000&us =AF iCNEiHDfCO iGetH3unPybGD7HxV ag3Q p. 22, Table 78. "Calculated: (1,390.11 MT CO2e/year) / (40 service population) _ (34.75 MT COze/SP/year). 1i Page 519 0 0 Service Population Efficiency 34.75 Threshold 3 Exceed? Yes As the table above demonstrates, when Project GHG emissions are modeled, they exceed the SCAQMD's 2035 service population efficiency threshold of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, thus resulting in a significant impact not previously assessed or identified in the DR. As a result, an FIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, - Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. 0 Page 520 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Za sector [late HO U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M -O LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.52359E+00 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57377E+00 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61568E+00 50.00 0,09 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65053E+00 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.68748E+00 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 7.0021001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49658E+00 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36242E+00 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2,0 0.29565E+00 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24761E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21162E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0,043 -9,000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18377E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1,30 0.043 -9,000 0.020 -999. 21. 6,0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16176E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14399E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12923E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 9.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.11704E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10664E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0,043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 521 310. E) 2.0 0.97783E-01 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90094E-01 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83395E-01 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77557E-01 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1.0011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72417E-01 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 7.0.0 310.0 2.0 0.67776E-01 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 2.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63627E-01 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59914E-01 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56573E-01 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53554E-01 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50780E-01 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48248E-01 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 9.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45934E-01 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43811E-01 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011003 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 7.0.0 310.0 2.0 0.41842E-01 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40023E-01 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.59 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38340E-01 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 522 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36780E-01 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35322E-01 859.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.@ 2.0 0.33952E-01 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1@011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.008 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32674E-01 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.029 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.31478E-01 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 9.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30359E-01 950.01 0.00 5.0 hinter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29304E-01 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28313E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27380E-01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1@011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26501E-01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25669E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24883E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.9 1.000 1.50 @.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24138E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 100110@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23427E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 @.5@ 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22753E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1@011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22112E-01 1200.@@ 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.00@ 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 523 0 0.21501E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20918E-01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20360E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19828E-01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19319E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.59 0.35 0.59 10,0 310.0 2.9 0.18832E-01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10911007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 9.18367E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.900 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17922E-01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 9.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.3.7495E-01 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17086E-01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011907. -1.30 0.043 -9.900 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16693E-01 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16315E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011991 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 22. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15952E-01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0,35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15603E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15267E-01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31,0.0 2.0 0.14944E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14632E-01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 524 0 0 310.0 2.0 0.14331E-01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 7..50 0.35 0.50 10.9 310.0 2.0 0.14041E-01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13762E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1..50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13492E-01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13230E-01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12977E-01 1775.00 0.00 5,0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 9.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12733E-01 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12586E-01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10012001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.S9 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12354E-01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12129E-01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.59 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11911E-01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11699E-01 1925.00 0.00 e.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11494E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11295E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9,020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 7.0,0 310.0 2.0 0.11102E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10915E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10733E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 525 0 S -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10556E-01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10385E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10217E-01 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.009 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19055E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98972E-02 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.009 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97434E-02 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95938E-02 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10911001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94481E-02 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.93062E-02 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10013001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.9 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91679E-02 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90332E-02 2325.09 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89018E-02 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87737E-02 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86488E-02 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1,30 0.043 -9.009 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85270E-02 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011091 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84080E-02 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 526 0 0 0.82920F-02 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81786E-02 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011801 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80679E-02 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-36e 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 e.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79598E-02 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1,000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78542E-02 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.009 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77510E-02 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76501E-02 2625.90 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75515E-02 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74550E-02 2675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73607E-02 2700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10911001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72684E-02 2725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10017.001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 6.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71781E-02 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70897E-02 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-350 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 9.70032E-02 2800.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69184F-02 2825.00 0.e0 10.0 Winter 9-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68355E-02 2850.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67543E-02 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.900 0.029 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 527 310.0 2.0 0.66747E-02 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65967E-02 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65203E-02 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64454E-02 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.e 0.53720E-02 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.090 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63000E-02 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10911001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62235E-02 3950.90 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61503E-02 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.900 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60924E-02 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 7.0.0 310.0 2.0 0.60258E-02 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 9.59604E-02 3159.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310-0 2.0 0.58963E-02 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.39 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58333E-02 3299.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 9.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57715E-02 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57108E-02 3250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56512E-92 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55927E-02 3300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 528 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55353E-02 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1..50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54788E-02 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54233E-02 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.@43 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53689E-02 3400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0--360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53153E-02 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52627E-02 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52109E-02 3475.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10@11001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 8.51600E-02 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.@43 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51100E-02 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50609E-02 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50125E-02 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 100110@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49649E-02 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49181E-02 3625.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48721E-02 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-350 10011001 -1.30 0.@43 -9.00@ 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48268E-02 3675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 1@011@@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47822E-02 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 529 0 0 0.47384E-02 3725.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46952E-02 3750.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46527E-02 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46109E-02 3809.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011002 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45697E-02 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 --999. 21. 6,0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45291E-02 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 9.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44892E-02 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44499E-02 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1 -SO 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.44111E-02 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43730E-02 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43354E-02 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 9-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42984E-02 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42619E-02 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42259E-02 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41905E-02 4075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.41556E-02 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0,50 10.0 310.0 2-0 0.41212E-02 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 530 310.0 2.0 0.40872E-02 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011,001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40538E-02 4175.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40208E-02 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39883E-02 4225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31.0.0 2.0 0.39562E-02 4250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.00@ 0.020 --999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39246E-02 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38934E-02 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 100110@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38627E-02 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 19911001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.006 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38324E-02 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38024E-02 4375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37729E-02 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0--360 10011901 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37438E-02 4425.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10@110@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37150E-02 4449.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36867E-02 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36587E-02 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36310E-02 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1.007.1991 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36038E-02 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 531 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35769E-02 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35503E-02 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35241E-02 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34982E-02 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34726E-02 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34474E-02 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34225E-02 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33979E-02 4750.00 0.00 S.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33735E-02 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33495E-02 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33258E-02 4825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33024E-02 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1..59 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32792E-02 4875.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32564E-02 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9,020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.090 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32338E-02 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011901 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32115E-02 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.900 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 532 0 0 0.31894E-02 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.009 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1..50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31676E-02 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 533 0 0 AERSCREEN 16216 / AERMOD 19191 02/10/20 08:15:01 TITLE: Xebec Warehouse Project Operation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS **************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE AREA EMISSION RATE: AREA HEIGHT: AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION RURAL OR URBAN: POPULATION: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE = 0.400E-03 g/s 0.208E-07 g/(s-m2) 3.00 meters 198.00 meters 97.00 meters 1.50 meters URBAN 177452 5000. meters 0.317E-02 lb/hr 0.165E-06 lb/(hr-m2) 9.84 feet 649.61 feet 318.24 feet 4.92 feet 16494. feet ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- *********************** BUILDING DOWNWASH PARAMETERS ********************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON -POINT SOURCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR 20 SURFACE I -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD ----------------------------------------------------- 1* 1.000 0.6875 0 100.0 WIN * = worst case diagonal Page 534 0 0 ********************** MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ********************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE MINIMUM WIND SPEED: ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 250.0 / 310.0 (K) 0.5 m/s 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.S0 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY 3DY HR 10 01 10 10 01 H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF W5 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 310.0 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************ AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM DIST 1 -HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- 1.00 0.5236 MAXIMUM DIST 1 -HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- 2525.00 0.8068E-02 Page 535 0 0 25 00 0.5738 2550.00 0.7960E-02 50.00 0.6157 2575.00 0.7854E-02 75.00 0.6505 2600.00 0.775IE-02 100.00 0.6875 2625.00 0.7650E-02 125.00 0.4966 2650.00 0.7551E-02 150.00 0.3624 2675.00 0.7455E-02 175.00 0.2957 2700.00 0.7361E-02 200,00 0.2476 2725.00 0.7268E-02 225.00 0.2116 2750.00 0.7178E-02 250.00 0.1838 2775.00 0.7090E-02 275.00 0.1618 2800.00 0.7003E-02 300.00 0.1440 2825.00 0.6918E-02 325.00 0.1292 2850.00 0.6836E-02 350.09 0.1170 2875.00 0.6754E-02 375.00 0.1066 2900.00 0.6675E-02 400.08 0.9778E-01 2925.00 0.6597E-02 425.00 0.9009E-01 2959.00 0.6520E-02 450.00 0.8339E-01 2975.00 0.6445E-02 475.00 0.7756E-01 3000.00 0.6372E-02 500.00 0.7242E-01 3025.00 0.6300E-02 525.00 0.6778E-01 3050.00 0.6229E-02 550.00 0.6363E-01 3074.99 0.6160E-02 575.00 0.5991E-01 3100.00 0.6092E-02 600.00 0.5657E-01 3125.00 0.6025E-02 625.00 0.5355E-01 3150.00 0.5960E-02 650.00 0.5078E-01 3174.99 0.5896E-02 675.00 0.4825E-01 3200.00 0.5833E-02 700.00 0.4593E-01 3225.00 0.5772E-02 725.00 0.438IE-01 3250.00 0.5711E-02 750.00 0.4184E-01 3275.00 0.5651E-02 775.00 0.4002E-01 3300.00 0.5593E-02 800.00 0.3834E-01 3325.00 0.5535E-02 825.00 0.3678E-01 3350.00 0.5479E-02 850.00 0.3532E-01 3375.00 0.5423E-02 875.00 0.3395E-01 3400.00 0.5369E-02 900.00 0.3267E-01 3425.00 0.5315E-02 925.00 0.3148E-01 3450.00 0.5263E-02 950.01 0.3036E-01 3475.00 0.5211E-02 975.00 0.2930E-01 3500.00 0.5160E-02 1000.00 0.2831E-01 3525.00 0.51IOE-02 1025.00 0.2738E-01 3550.00 0.5061E-02 1050.00 0.2650E-01 3575.00 0.5012E-02 1075.00 0.2567E-01 3600.00 0.4965E-02 1100.00 0.2488E-01 3625.00 0.4918E-02 1125.00 0.2414E-01 3650.00 0.4872E-02 1150.00 0.2343E-01 3675.00 0.4827E-02 1175.90 0.2275E-01 3700.00 0.4782E-02 1200.00 0.2211E-01 3725.00 0.4738E-02 1225.00 0.2150E -0I 3750.00 0.4695E-02 1250.00 0.2092E-01 3775.00 0.4653E-02 Page 536 0 0 1275.00 0.2036E-01 3800.00 0.4611E-02 1305.00 0.1983E-01 3825.00 0.4570E-02 1325.00 0.1932E-01 3849.99 0.4529E-02 1350.00 0.1883E-01 3875.00 0.4489E-02 1375.00 0.1837E-01 3900.00 0.4450E-02 1400.00 0.1792E-01 3925,00 0.4411E-02 1425.00 0.1750E-01 3950.00 0.4373E-02 1450.00 0.1709E-01 3975.00 0.4335E-02 1475.00 0.1669E-01 4000.00 0.4298E-02 1500.00 0.1532E-01 4025.00 0.4262E-02 1525.90 0.1595E-01 4050.00 0.4226E-02 1550.00 0.1569E-01 4075.00 0.4190E-02 1575.00 0.1527E-01 4100.00 0.4156E-02 1600.00 0,1494E-01 4125.00 0.4121E-02 1625.00 0.1463E-01 4150.00 0.4087E-02 1650.00 0.1433E-01 4175.00 0.4054E-02 1675.00 0.1404E-01 4200.00 0.4021E-02 1700.00 0.1376E-01 4225.00 0.3988E-02 1725.00 0.1349E-01 4250.90 0.3956E-02 1750.00 0.1323E-01 4275.00 0.3925E-02 1775.00 0.1298E-01 4300.00 0.3893E-02 1800.00 0.1273E-01 4325.00 0.3863E-02 1825.00 0.1259E-01 4350.00 0.3832E-02 1850.00 0.1235E-01 4375.99 0.3802E-02 1875.00 0.1213E-01 4400.00 0.3773E-02 1900.00 0.1191E-01 4425.00 0.3744E-02 1925.00 0.1170E-01 4449.99 0.3715E-02 1959.00 0.17.49E-01 4475.00 0.3687E-02 1975.00 0,1130E-01 4500.00 0.3659E-02 2005.00 0.1110E-01 4525.00 0.3631E-02 2025.00 0.1091E-01 4550.00 0.3604E-02 2050.00 0.1073E-01 4575.00 0.3577E-02 2075.00 0.1056E-01 4600.00 0.3550E-02 2100.00 0.1038E-01 4625,00 0.3524E-02 2125.00 0.1022E-01 4650.00 0.3498E-02 2150.00 0.1006E-01 4675.00 0.3473E-02 2175.00 0.9897E-02 4700.00 0.3447E-02 2200.00 0.9743E-02 4725.00 0.3422E-02 2225.00 0.9594E-02 4750.00 0.3398E-02 2250.00 0.9448E-02 4775.00 0.3374E-02 2275.00 0.9306E-02 4800.00 0.3350E-02 2300.00 0.97.68E-02 4825.00 0.3326E-02 2325.09 0.9033E-02 4850.00 0.3302E-02 2350.00 0.8902E-92 4875.00 0.3279E-02 2375.00 0.8774E-92 4900.00 0.3256E-02 2400.00 0.8649E-02 4924.99 0.3234E-02 2425.00 0.8527E-02 4950.00 0.3211E-02 2450.00 0.8408E-02 4975.00 0.3189E-02 2475.00 0.8292E-02 5009.00 0.3168E-02 2500.00 0.8179E-02 Page 537 0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ******************* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8 -hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1 -hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4) Report number EPA -454/R-92-019 http://www.epa.goy/scram00l/guidance_permit.htm under Screening Guidance IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters Page 538 MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1 -HOUR 3 -HOUR 8 -HOUR 24-HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) ------- (ug/m3) ---------- (ug/m3) (ug/m3) FLAT TERRAIN 0.6875 0.6875 0.6875 --------- 0.6875 ---------- N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 100.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 0.5236 N/A DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters Page 538 0 0 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date HO L1* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF W5 HT REF TA HT 0.46776E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2,0 0.51259E+01 25.00 9.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0,020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55003E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58117E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9,000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.61417E+01 190.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44363E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6,0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32378E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.920 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26412E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 9.043 -9.000 0.02.0 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31.0.0 2.0 0.22121E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 1007.1001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0,020 -999. 21. 610 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.18906E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.55 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16418E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.59 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14451E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1,000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12863E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11545E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 --1,30 0.043 -9.000 0,020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10456E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 6.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95267E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 539 310.0 2. E) 0.87356E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80487E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.029 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.9 0.74503E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69287E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1,30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64696E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60549E+00 S25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0,59 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56842E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53525E+00 S75.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.3S 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.9 0.50541E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.920 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.S0 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47844E+09 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.3S 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45365E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 9,50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43104E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41036E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39139E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37380E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-369 19011901 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35755E+00 775.00 0,00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 --1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.34252E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 540 s 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32858E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31555E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011901 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30332E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 37.0.0 2.0 0.29190E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Minter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28121E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0,020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 9.27122E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26179E+00 975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25294E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21, 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24467.E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23675E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22932E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22230E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9,000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21564E+90 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20930E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20327E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19754E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 7.0011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 541 • 0 0.19209E+@0 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18688E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.00@0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 03560 015@11000.0 310.0 2.0 0.18189E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 093560 0150110100.0 310.0 2.0 0.17713E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011002 -1.30 0.043 -9.0@0 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.@ 0.17259E+00 1325.00 e.0@ 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16824E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 093560 010011000.0 310.0 2.0 0.16409E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0.-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16011E+00 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.920 -999. 21. 6.0 1.00@ 1.50 0@35 310.0 2.0 60 010�i1@00 0 0.15630E+00 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0--360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15264E+00 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 310.0 2.0 1.50 093560 @1 @11000 0 0.14913E+00 1475.0@ 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.7.4575E+00 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14251E+00 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 310.0 2.0 6.0 1.000 1.50 003560 0.50 10 110001 0 0.13939E+00 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.009 0.020 -999. 21. 5.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13639E+00 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 100110@1 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999, 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13350E+00 1600.00 0.00 5-0 Winter @-360 10@11001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.7.3072E+00 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter -1.30 0.043 -9.@00 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 093560 0100011000.0 Page 542 0 0 310.0 2.0 0.12803E+00 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12544E+06 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.9 310.0 2.0 0.12294E+00 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12053E+00 1725.00 0.80 5.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11819E+00 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11593E+00 7.775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11375E+00 1806.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11244E+00 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.S0 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17.037E+00 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10836E+00 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10641E+00 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10452E+00 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10269E+00 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19091E+00 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.04.3 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10,0 310.0 2.0 0.99185E-01 2006.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 7.0.0 310.0 2.0 0.97517.E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 19011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95886E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 543 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.@20 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94307E-01 2075.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92772E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0.360 10011007. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 2.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91280E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10021002 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89829E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88418E-01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011091 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87045E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 20011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 5.85708E-01 2225.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84406E--01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 20022001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83139E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011091 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81903E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80700E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011002 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79526E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78382E-01 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77266E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 7.0011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76177E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75115E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.@00 0.02@ -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 19.0 310.0 2.0 Page 544 0 0 0.74078E-01 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9,000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73065E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72077E-01 2525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2,0 0.71111E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70167E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69245E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1..30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68344E-01 2625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67463E-01 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66601E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65758E-01 2700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64933E-01 2725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1..30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64127E-01 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63337E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62564E-01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61807E-01 2825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61067E-01 2850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.090 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60341E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 545 ! 0 310.0 2.0 0.59630E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011091 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.029 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58933E-01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 6.5@ 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58251E-01 2959.00 0.00 5.0 Winter e-360 10011061 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57582E-01 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10911007. -1.39 0.043 -9.00@ 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.00@ 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56926E-01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 @.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 6.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56283E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011061 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 9.3S 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55652E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0.360 10011901 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55034E-01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 _9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54428E-61 3100.00 0.00 S.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53832E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53248E-01 3150.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-350 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1 -SO 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52676E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.@00 1.50 0.35 0.5@ 16.0 310.0 2.0 0.52113E-@1 3199.99 6.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51561E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011991 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51019E-01 3250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50487E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49964E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 546 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49451E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 20011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48946E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48451E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10012001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 z.0 0.47964E-01 3400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 --1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47485E-01 3425.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47015E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46553E-01 3475.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46098E-01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45652E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45212E-01 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44780E-01 3575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44355E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43937E-01 3625.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43526E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43121E-01 3675.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42723E-01 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 19011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 547 9 0.42331E-01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41945E-01 3750.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 1001].001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41566E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41192E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40824E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40462E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011807. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40105E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39754E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39408E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39067E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38731E-01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38400E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10811002 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38074E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37753E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37437E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.58 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37125E-01 4100.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36817E-01 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Page 548 0 0 310.0 2.0 0.36514E-01 4150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36215E-01 4175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35921E-01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35630E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35344E-01 4250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35061E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 9.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34783E-01 4300.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.3450SE-01 4325.00 0.00 e.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.e 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34237E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33970E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter e-360 10011001 -1.30 9.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 e.33706E-01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.9 1-000 1.50 e.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33446E-01 4425.00 0.00 1e.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33189E-01 4449.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32.936E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32686E-01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32439E -e1 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32195E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 Page 549 0 0 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31955E-01 4575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 I.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31717E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31483E-01 4625.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31252E-01 4650.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31024E-01 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 31.0.0 2.0 0.30798E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0.360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30575E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011003 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 I.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30355E-01 4750.00 0.00 S.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.3S 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30138E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29924E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29712E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29502E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 8-360 10011001 -1.30 0-043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29296E-01 4875.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 I0011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29091E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28890E-01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28690E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 550 0 0 0.28493E-01 4975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10021907. -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28299E-01 5000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 9.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 Page 551 AERSCREEN 16216 / AERMOD 19191 02/05/20 12:27:12 TITLE: Xebec Warehouse Construction ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ****************************** AREA PARAMETERS *************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- SOURCE EMISSION RATE AREA EMISSION RATE: AREA HEIGHT: AREA SOURCE LONG SIDE: AREA SOURCE SHORT SIDE: INITIAL VERTICAL DIMENSION RURAL OR URBAN: POPULATION: INITIAL PROBE DISTANCE 0.357E-02 g/s 0.186E-06 9/(s -m2) 3.00 meters 198.00 meters 97.00 meters 1.50 meters URBAN 177452 5000. meters 0.283E-01 lb/hr 0.148E-05 lb/(hr-m2) 9.84 feet 649.61 feet 318.24 feet 4.92 feet 16404. feet BUILDING DOWNWASHrPARAMETERS ********************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- BUILDING DOWNWASH NOT USED FOR NON -POINT SOURCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ************************** FLOW SECTOR ANALYSIS *************************** 25 meter receptor spacing: 1. meters - 5000. meters ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM IMPACT RECEPTOR Zo SURFACE 1 -HR CONC RADIAL DIST TEMPORAL SECTOR ROUGHNESS (ug/m3) (deg) (m) PERIOD ----` 1* 1.000 6.142 0 100.0WIN * = worst case diagonal Page 552 0 0 MAKEMET METEOROLOGY PARAMETERS ****************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MIN/MAX TEMPERATURE: MINIMUM WIND SPEED: ANEMOMETER HEIGHT: 250.0 / 310.0 (K) 0.5 m/s 10.000 meters SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS INPUT: AERMET SEASONAL TABLES DOMINANT SURFACE PROFILE: Urban DOMINANT CLIMATE TYPE: Average Moisture DOMINANT SEASON: Winter ALBEDO: 0.35 BOWEN RATIO: 1.50 ROUGHNESS LENGTH: 1.000 (meters) SURFACE FRICTION VELOCITY (U*) NOT ADUSTED METEOROLOGY CONDITIONS USED TO PREDICT OVERALL MAXIMUM IMPACT ------------------------------------------------------------- YR MO DY 3DY HR 10 01 10 10 01 - -HO Y - �*- - -W* - DT/DZ -ZICNV ZIMCH- M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN-ALBEDO REF WS -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 - 1.000 1.50 0.35 - 0.50 HT REF TA HT 10.0 310.0 2.0 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- AERSCREEN AUTOMATED DISTANCES ********************** OVERALL MAXIMUM CONCENTRATIONS BY DISTANCE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAXIMUM DIST I -HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- 1.00 4.678 MAXIMUM DIST 1 -HR CONC (m) (ug/m3) --------------------- 2525.00 0.7208E-01 Page 553 0 0 25.00 5.126 2550.00 0.7111E-01 50.00 5.500 2575.00 0.7017E-01 75.00 5.812 2600.00 0.6925E-01 100.00 6.142 2625.00 0.6834E-01 125.00 4.436 2650.00 0.6746E-01 150.00 3.238 2675.00 0.6660E-01 175.00 2.641 2700.00 0.6576E-01 200.00 2.212 2725.00 0.6493E-01 225.00 1.891 27S0.00 0.6413E-01 250.00 1.642 2775.00 0.6334E-01 275.00 1.445 2800.00 0.6256E-01 300.00 1.286 2825.00 0.6181E-01 325.00 1.154 2850.00 0.6107E-01 350.00 1.046 2875.00 0.6034E-01 375.00 0.9527 2900.00 0.5963E-01 400.00 0.8736 2925.00 0.5893E-01 425.00 0.8049 2950.00 0.5825E-01 450.00 0.7450 2975.00 0.5758E-01 475.00 0.6929 3000.00 0.5693E-01 500.00 0.5470 3025.00 0.5628E-01 525.00 0.6055 3050.00 0.5565E-01 550.00 0.5684 3074.99 0.5503E-01 575.00 0.5353 3100.00 0.5443E-01 600.00 0.5054 3125.00 0.5383E-01 625.00 0.4784 3150.00 0.5325E-01 650.09 0.4537 3174.99 0.5268E-01 675.00 0.4320 3199.99 0.5211E-01 700.00 0.4104 3225.00 0.5156E-01 725.00 0.3914 3250.00 0.5102E-01 750.00 0.3738 3275.00 0.5049E-01 775.00 0.3576 3300.00 0.4996E-01 800.00 0.3425 3325.00 0.4945E-01 825.00 0.3286 3350.00 0.4895E-01 850.00 0.3156 3375.00 0.4845E-01 875.00 0.3033 3400.00 0.4796E-01 900.00 0.2919 3425.00 0.4749E-01 925.00 0.2812 3450.00 0.4702E-01 950.01 0.2712 3475.00 0.4655E-01 975'00 0.2618 3500.00 0.4610E-01 1000.00 0.2529 3525.00 0.4565E-01 1025.00 0.2446 3550.00 0.4521E-01 1050.00 0.2367 3575.00 0.4478E-01 1075.00 0.2293 3600.00 0.4436E-01 1100.00 0.2223 3625.00 0.4394E-01 1125.00 0.2156 3650.00 0.4353E-01 1150.00 0.2093 3675.00 0.4312E-01 1175.00 0.2033 3700.00 0.4272E-01 1200.00 0.1975 3724.99 0.4233E-01 1225.00 0.1921 3750.00 0.419SE-01 1250.00 0.1869 3775.00 0.4157E-01 Page 554 • 0 1275.00 0.1819 3800.00 0.4119E-01 1300.00 0.1771 3825.00 0,4082E-01 1325.00 0.1726 3850.00 0.4046E-01 1350.00 0.1682 3875.00 0.4011E-01 1375.00 0.1641 3900.00 0.3975E-01 1400.00 0.1601 3925.00 0.3941E-01 1425.00 0.1563 3950.00 0.3907E-01 1450.00 0.1526 3975.00 0.3873E-01 1475.00 0.1491 4000.00 0.3840E-01 1500.00 0.1458 4025.00 0.3807E-01 1525.00 0.1425 4050.00 0.3775E-01 1550.00 0.1394 4075.00 0.3744E-01 1575.00 0.1364 4100.00 0.377.2E-01 1600.00 0.1335 4125.00 0.3682E-01 1625.00 0.1307 4150.00 0.3651E-01 1650.00 0.1280 4175.00 0.3622E-01 1675.00 0.1254 4200.00 0.3592E-01 1700.00 0.1229 4225.00 0.3563E-01 1725.00 0.1205 4250.00 0.3534E-01 1750.00 0.1182 4275.00 0.3506E-01 1775.00 0.1159 4300.00 0.3478E-01 1800.90 0.1138 4325.00 0.3451.E-01 1825.00 0.1124 4350.00 0.3424E-01 1850.00 0.1104 4375.00 0.3397E-01 1875.00 0.1084 4400.00 0.3371E-01 1900.00 0.1064 4425.00 0.3345E-01 1925.00 0.1045 4449.99 0.3319E-01 1.950.09 0.7.027 4475.00 0.3294E-01 1975.00 0.1009 4500.00 0.3269E-01 2000.00 0.9918E-01 4525.00 0.3244E-01 2025.00 0.9751E-01 4550.00 0.3220E-01 2050.00 0.9589E-01 4575.00 0.3195E-01 2075.00 0.9437.E-01 4600.00 0.3172E-01 2100.00 0.9277E-01 4625.00 0,3148E-01 2125.00 0.9128E-01 4650.00 0.3125E-01 2150.00 0.8983E-01 4675.00 0.3102E-01 2175.00 0.8842E-01 4700.00 0.3080E-01 2200.00 0.8704E-01 4725.00 0.3058E-01 2225.00 0.8571E-01 4750.00 0.3036E-01 2250.00 0,8441E-01 4775.00 0.3014E-01 2275.00 0.8314E-01 4800.00 0.2992E-01 2300.00 0.8190E-01 4825.00 0.2971E-01 2325.00 0.8070E-01 4850.00 0.2950E-01 2350.00 0.7953E-01 4875.00 0.2930E-01 2375.00 0.7838E-01 4900.00 0.2909E-01 2400.00 0.7727E-01 4925.00 0.2889E-01 2425.00 0.7618E-01 4950.00 0.2869E-01 2450.00 0.7511E-01 4975.00 0.2849E-01 2475.00 0.7408E-01 5000.00 0.2830E-01 2500.00 0.7307E-01 Page 555 0 11 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- AERSCREEN MAXIMUM IMPACT SUMMARY ****************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-hour, 8 -hour, and 24-hour scaled concentrations are equal to the 1 -hour concentration as referenced in SCREENING PROCEDURES FOR ESTIMATING THE AIR QUALITY IMPACT OF STATIONARY SOURCES, REVISED (Section 4.5.4) Report number EPA -454/R-92-07.9 http://www.epa.goy/scram00l/guidance_permit.htm under Screening Guidance IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 4.678 4.678 4.678 4.678 NIA DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters Page 556 MAXIMUM SCALED SCALED SCALED SCALED 1 -HOUR 3 -HOUR 8 -HOUR 24 --HOUR ANNUAL CALCULATION CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC PROCEDURE (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) (ug/m3) FLAT TERRAIN 6.142 6.142 6.142---- --- 6.142 -v- - NIA DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 100.00 meters IMPACT AT THE AMBIENT BOUNDARY 4.678 4.678 4.678 4.678 NIA DISTANCE FROM SOURCE 1.00 meters Page 556 0.. N L[7 O N O N N ai [>3 LR C' S 0 a� 07 m IL N Cy] cfl a N 0 Z> W W_ CQ U C 41 2i U.1 W m U 47 tm co N D c r T 0 0 0 T" . P, . o E :co a 10cc A Q 0 ❑ T I � m N I m N L I 4 � `s i � a � ❑ In rin ra I o io ro n io 'n 'a r a R c Iw f 7 u) I In :p n ' u7 cc' I C7 ❑ 0 I I LL I I w 1 I r I 01 N 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I C Q 1 r 1❑ I CD ! 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I I ' 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 r 1 1 e t � ' I I I Y ' � 6 c r � 1 I Q I I I � I I 0 n I N D f 0 r 1❑ I u I R 7 � i� �U7 I 1 r 1 I I ' 1 1 ' 1 I I I r � I d r I I m cliO LV O C11 T" . P, . o E :co 10cc A :ID Q 0 ❑ T m m N ' N r ] ' 7 r U) N L N J � `s a O m m r a R c ;m rn 'r m m :p 4 cc' 7 m cliO LV O C11 N N E O A y Q N _T �Vl T m 6 N � m O m m r a R 3: CL No 4 ❑ Z: m cliO LV O C11 N N C7 wEn C tv U � N czg U �- U N N U_ 2 n - Page 557 N E A y _T �Vl N � N y w N m L C iO U L C m 7 � r+ cm :1 In n d O L a L c a 41 ❑ ❑ £ w N o a F N a !d £ T = Dinin r U (m]S N N C7 wEn C tv U � N czg U �- U N N U_ 2 n - Page 557 N f17 0 CV O N ti N ❑7 N C'l C) N "❑ ❑ w U ❑ N -�3 O ui w 0 U 0 L LO n 'N `N N 'Cm1F co N N N N N N CL Z N . L; 0 Page 558 I I I I I 1 I I I I I I t 1 I I f I I I I ! F I I I I I I I I E ] I I I I I I I I I I 1 i I I I I m r I I I C7 I I I I I i qI I D I I I I I I p 1❑ I m I m ICO I m ] m I W _ r• f !• I� I� I [� I m ILP I� I I I I I ! I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S I I I I I t I I I I I I t eLI L t8 L LL E m m SCC o]� c .S 0 0 F' AHI '0�I 7 N ' N f!"1 6 =) a a ' c ro c J � J L E N Q cL d' , Q , Cl Q E N , IA ff"�AA r U . V [] • V L1 . v 9 cd> _J . J ' N ' L tl7 ' L N • Q1 L 4] i q) Q F •N N_ ' W C N 0 Page 558 0 E tv c m c ❑ d a m Q � o � e N f a l0 0 10 O a p C, N I 1 N 1 N U o to 0 Ito v a J Ln a ❑ h n m �m75 U o I� l uy ID C IQ F A v o N LD Fm o O16 o 0 o N 4 n 0 iq] a 63 o ri a c u] ! L _p O v7 � c CO RN Q � c a O O I!] 1� ♦71 ! <V p�j �— O U m Q • O O a a c � ryy}r�r Ula F (0 1!] O1 I N OO I � 4 .tea � ✓Z I Yln n I r v c o LL I m v 7 d G U [ NI!] �fti 7 � it (n M LO U L 2" ,.- 1 o r ['7 -0�Ja p a �o 0 T � ["] Q• � W O a� t•] � a� � � y n a LL c 1 ^• ci Ija Lu J n� I w i o ry I o� ep y jMa ] a 1 M v F N O N 0 Y o n LL d 4 10 Q 4 i 0 p a_ o ---i• 1 En m Id m z � 0 0 H 1 o a O N c -C o r I c] m I m n m 1M M ❑ a ni o cy U o O O 1 x a ! to Q 1 m 34 o z 0 n 1! A oa 1g� of N N i 0 N 2 ;oma Iry my ["7 1 fa V M 1 Ncm 0 1 i -i cy C7 v w � ri I In v7 N a U n I rvy M W = C x rr I to sr LLl 0Qi Q I RS rZ c°pn n Y•+ �. y � G n U C ❑ aL.. y ar y� I N >r ff f N 4 ❑ n Lq u�y Q la c > U U LU I� ' 7 • N ° N ;N _ x E Page 559 tv c m c ❑ d a m Q U o I Ito Ln a ❑ n m �m75 U o ID C F A v o N O16 o 0 o N 4 n 0 iq] a 63 o ri a c _p O ryrrr CO RN r a 1 c I!] 1� ♦71 ! <V p�j �— O F Ula I � .tea rQo o Q Yln n I r v c o LL I m v 7 d G [ I. p T � ["] Q• � W O a� o Ija Lu J ---r--- f i o ry I o� ep y a 1 M v Y o LL d 4 i 0 p a mLL o m Id m ti � 0 0 O N c �v I10 Q I n +r r I c] m m n m 1M M ❑ a ni o cy U o 1 x a ! to Q 1 m 34 o z n 1! A Q O N i 0 N 2 fa V M 1 Ncm 0 1 i -i cy C7 v w � ri I In v7 ❑ a C Q1 O a� Page 559 0 9 Page 560 1 :� M m C N '� • T ' n C a ILLpa[V I ! I olaro 1u 7o i m C? 2 a 1�0 to Ip to n a CV frn In la Ia o - ----I .... N 1 i n t 6 a,,, iW iz� Ic ni la - - ca a c O C3 0� c� $ i� 16i IrNi fv Im I� ma loi Ir' MN Q C i7 a m rn o r o acn I m Iq 1 a fnai °? C Q rn n n m m o oa in f IQ Ir n a nin o 0 o v a a ® ry v f m I I n I of c q _..L ---- L .. --- ._� ❑ o d rna N .� N CO n ! • L La E m o .o o :tr S nni ml ❑ ti � y Ip Im to to M t ni fa oa Ia I" In la a la IG to IG I I a o co I I 0 .-. .i Lno. iQ tam Ip � o -0 •��- COC7 p t" n0- !1J Ca C I �O IO �N a 4 B v 4 p ca a l I r 1 I ..-----r----r--^-r---- � C * c N � � - •�_ ni i I 1 0 1 I o x �q 4 I C ❑ LI,I I I a n Q l I I I 0 d^ 01 m 1n n 7 0 r. W m I 1 I i on M o G o 0 0 o b F to I� Ia Ip o t o t o I Q t o v Q I G `�---^r-`--�-- V7 _ r I IDn7 la IQ n 7 edn rg oa Eo IIn la og Ivt o I o 0 v L E W a. la Ini la !a y�E I I 1 f I� I I co co ga- LL n a 'I' I I 1 ----i ----` ---`i ----•-`-- x o io Io 1 I N O v f o a I o o f I a o n a w y o INS Irna I 1 1�-� rn p v o N fy n N N v N m Ica l a I 1 -r• -----------�----€- u•� W K+ m N 4'�1 A _� = 1 f i I y _ d D am Fv' Ia 1 I I I rn N v o I I ni I a QLU -�-...�----�----r- It L!J o n nN Ia !4 n I I I N n N 4 N )r C 0 I n s I I n m ni i _• ___ C N N ✓n vo N �... �i 1 I F I �, m lu7 IN I I A Ul CI, o Ic IQ I 3 c lu uj ' w O p❑ .... • a r M :w �} N C cm 7 Page 560 0 0 4) 0 C L H Q C Cl) V Page 561 m ;W - ;,n b v ❑ U N' co 'r 'M1 C•1M1 _p .n a .ai 'N v N W • V Lf7 o I d 1p Ip I� p C C\I Im I� fa rb cu im IN In r� a N a I16 fp 16 0 NW IN Ipi IM1 ri 7 ❑ Icc to I I Cl Im rw 10o Ip m I C Q b ?o I� Io In c`n im i� j4 I� e a 0 p o p N W � O U c •o 'o sv .;� r. o X40 X09 •cq •� v a v, ~ .. ❑ [] F I ! I I d ly Irn Ip Ip M o1n to Icfl to 1p n � -- -F----F----F----F---- 117 C �Ln is Im I I op lv� Ip I� C•] "❑ �:5; a Ip o v t o r$ c 0 0 � G O7 a 'r! I I M1 I I n 07 m N E Ica I i rq Q (Z co' --- --- I -. I I - " r - -r--'-r- U a 1 I a I N 1 I ppQ 10 Ip Irn IQ jC v U Q �F ao 10 Ic. !o to a q I Io I9 �d o n I o Iorl Ip I0 A x a v a 4 I p i a v I q I Q o a Ira Ip jp c N d ! I I I ____i O ---- j co 62 u a I 16 I I I _4 ---- ----i"---r CG x 0 r ---- I O iQ4 Io C7 oo C f • Icop Ivv C•7 I 1ri Ir _.__--- Cl e='• c po M !'r I v v I 1 ry I� f� I ❑ I W P 1n M1 p r I N r C 13 C N 0 0 v Q Cc p o 0 �' I ! f I o I I I 1 o 11J CD 0 Y, ' m • N _ • la �' m r1Y Qjld N 0 4) 0 C L H Q C Cl) V Page 561 0 0 Page 562 m Z CL ri N 117 fa W o a N O ImC N c a` 9 Y N •w a N QS • ❑ .� N c� Q - - -k -r -r �- -t -� a 1n ]' C7 it Ir CV 1 I 1cl N C 1 I I ! 1 p ❑ U z I I 1 I I 1 I N Df 1 C I I 1 i 4. N II] C'J _ C p � C i❑�o i i �� N N O IN �N 14 p Q [� C w I� f O 1- N Cu Q 1 N N 00 Q I �N 1N FN tp D] c'7 Ic7 M ci Ln I ❑ 1 j 4 I p ! 1 CU N C 4 0 $ tl7 I I 1 N 1 N i� ICV Q ICV I I'� I ICV C _ CV i 6.5 11~7 D I 1 1 1 1 N 1 i r I 1 Q 1 1 1= I m 1s .� m ' ❑ r e... 1 IU 1 '�. 1 I N 1 • ., x ro ; o iia a v a I Q 1 ,U . L N .O is r c i s i c� i N N ❑ m CD 1` cIi ' 1 7 I o . �1 m 7 : .. `¢ q 3 CD ❑ (V ❑ as R _0 += fA } 11J wE CL � Im :a In z , 4 c° CL :� N f w C ' � O C O r m U sA (3 00 a �m v a1 Dp G v .a = _ C as .a V Q N <D ; .5;aG is Gni , fu G O O (L) to an 0 Page 562 f 0 0 0 Lw N C , [11 , tD 00• n co v O O ;Ci O Lo ;C7 fl ;p 'O ;o t� ;o a Iq7 fn n W iu') v iv f 01 'L2 ! oo I� "t En Er Ips In E� !m iP7 1� Ep N 4' CD En Im d =^ E N I C, SOO Im !m Ed ; IC'J i[R ; I[A !^ i ❑ 4� k2 ! I I ! ! i I i 1 r I i I i I I ! I I [J p I ! �-- r4 10 •O ID fd 10 Ip :O I .4 Ip 4 O L I� 'R7 106 'C ' 06 'a7 Ips , IO I I^ I� rm '^ 'OO 10 Ip .O Ip ID j 'CO 'co ; W 'm tc6 Ica ]3: in0❑ V! OC I I.i 1 I , , , • I ' 1 co I t II Ir I � ❑ l'Tj t I , I • I I , r I � ' -..»-C-•--C..«T-----1•.»..T I I • I C I I N r C7 1 I r I +- I _-_ C...-T.-�Y.».-T__,.....-T__Y„«� = I C% I r I M t ["J r N r CV i t 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I I ICV 1 1 1 1 I t E tv � 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I f I I 7 1 I � C I 1 1 I t I {I I 1 I t I I r 1 I ! I 1 {] Q 1 I 1 r I f I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I f i I 1 r I t 1 1 1 I I I I 1 f 1 E 1 1i 1 1 I d1 I I I 1 I ! 1 I r I 1 I I I 1 1 I n- I I t I t I t 1 I r I r I I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I d 1 1 r 1 I I � -L 1 1 r 1 1 f I I 1 I I 1 1 r 1 t 1 f 1 1 1 r 1 I 1 � y I 1 1 1 I . 1 I t N 1 1 I C.7 1 1 1 1❑ 1 t 1 m I❑ r 1 1 I P 1 1 tl] 1 1 I P I I N I I m I 1 I H 1 1 = ' m I ro I I I I_ 1 : m 1 LU I I (J I❑ I N I 1 I O N I N I 1 L 1 ! 1 1 i i N t I❑ 1❑ f Q] 1 I❑ -O 1 Q7 . 1 I N I ctl m�C i ' 1 N N {11 b C i y _� 1❑ N e 1❑ 1 Vi I Q I ; 1 -S ❑ _w 1❑ 1~ N Q I Q 1~ r l N [d 1~ 67 r I I I N 1 I` N 1 +' 1 1 1 1 Q V1 I D 1 D 1 I I g I (] I I V e V ' U cli 1� 1 (] 1 1 1a '� I x I 1 I 1s '�= C 1 I d 15 I m U a1 M ❑ to IIL W U v � ; Lo z • Q) a, C C C C f G U LS U • � � N y N N N • U LLI C C C C C, C O P •❑ 10" O t6 fC Ql , LTi ; p+ ; CTI ❑1 , LTI Z70 ❑1 LA ' •� '� , , I [] U. c' fj E E E :a .v : :a a .a : o .n ' m is n '� •� fA ' �U •� Q7 m m In IL d a n -'d Q Page 563 0 d O V N fU CD N N R O 0 Z E 2r— ❑ r C4 C7 C] F -IL Page 564 N CL �v c f C3 xz > x 'x 'x 'x •x 'x lil N 1 Cm I x 7 F -I 'r� ;F-� 'F- 'FI irr .92 U 1 1 1 I I 1 1 e 1 , >� 1 I 1 1 1 U I 1 1 1 xx_ I ' P r I x_x � ,X Q Cx_x cx_x rrx_ ccx_ C I r I C I C I C I G Q � al iG7l SOI id iL7l FSI C o io iCD itD Ip >2 p y O 'C] 'O 14 'O 14 0 Lm �[V �N ecu ACV 1N 0 1 1 1 1 1I -c !tl7 i CTi jC7 1� f01 F- [fl 1 cc 110 1 IL I fD I cn 0 0 'p I I 1 I I 1 I I i LO 0 7 1 I I f I in iC ip n co im s 1 I I 4, co t I I 1 O _CD r9 10 Iq 1 Ip =qp O �p O ¢ 'Q i6 0 1 I I l 1 I 1 1 1 1 �OL 47 1- o •a N I y z I C] N 1 q, IO Ip x q F p ! O I p I O I q I O Lo p6 iL'j 'c ID IN I I I'n Ito � �z I 1 1 1 � 1 _1__1__1__1»..} CV C j� j t j CDIcc I Q E 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 7i CL I 1 1 I 1 W m n I f I I W w 0 [1 I 1 L. N O E ? O 0 m o .0 ' N LLILo sp c s ; U o 7z M c a _ m Q 0 o •acn r m 'A, •c` d O V N fU CD N N R O 0 Z E 2r— ❑ r C4 C7 C] F -IL Page 564 E 0 2 0 Page 565 N d co a o o v a U o o IL N - ... O o IQ l0 0 o t o l 0 0 CCptj d -r- - I -- "- i� iv P f v I v In C in [d N.... -r---- ❑ o to Im ! I rn w o to I� v I ! G 0U o o jlrn rn [o Ip Q Q 2 0 la itr I 1 C 'o �0 0 O U fq --------- ryy---------- Lr) ry o io ioa op 0 o c ❑ �. 014 N a !o Ivto O 22 o o aN O C Ce) -0 6 (L 0 10 i q 67 a.n _ o !v I m o v m o p}� !a o o loo og C IL tl I4 1V a - ❑ 'o l0 I I r� o v c7 .❑ v t o I to, to I i___.�,..__ N 14 IvLO 11 vu7 0 a a 00 u i� Fao r ---- r____ a o c t o I m lor7 m c^ v �v L]0. Iv Imv x �, q o !Q I� a to Ipu7 d oln N o to !vv o� � d7 CJ o fv I� o to lore m oro ❑ o Iv lIN [ r m� try 0 LLJ K o f v I ro ¢I [n 0 en ---r`ri O .� L'V H � � io 14v va � Ci 0 � Q to 14ov o4 � > C 0 ❑ U' v l0 1�� i arm .: - O p Lu `�� a ; o ; ; 9 W 111 •� �' � '� o �a ;> a U n► C c7 � 0 2 0 Page 565 11 (n q C] 0 Page 566 0 a C N--"_ ---'� ---- 0 Q N !Q I 0 O -r- --- N n N 2 v 0 'o lo'n osn �o oQ fog 00 Y Lc T ,II I v ----i •---; •_-_ O rV p is o la Iv a Q O U o o 0 d o o i 0 0 v U b 4 b m .c o 0 (] N' a Io inv o� 4'] o Id IOa pp 0 a I !� 117 0 N l.T] m N pOG i d I m 01 q b I p ! Q D 0 e7 kd w Q �o hod cQ b O 2 3 I ---'�'---'�'---- 0 d o 6] m -_ 3°N ,d pll Q tQ jolIo f all a I v ! v o w LL CL 66 .� _ _ .f_ I V I 1 .6 �~ ! d O p i q ; o p p 0Z¢ x o jo joy o� o I o I v v p v O 0. v ! o I Q Q 4 Q Lu a f I ad I I Q to IuI m q M U Via. o to fmd by I I� x N o I v f16 o Io Ic7� dy N to v Id jov a� � N p c) Q I4 I C1 v I4 loci ops.., o to Ir�o ryo 1 I cp op 0 111' p o i4 loa cd cu Q jQ fav =d U cv c' I� I� Eq 0 N C" Z o Eo lov p� G Q Q O I p 1 I If n E m LU W m U (D 0 N z M (n q C] 0 Page 566 2 a_ Ll tA El m N o U o o .o I• o !q o N z a 14 0 ❑ 1 o Iq to p ) qo to to 0 o Ina rro 1 I Z n to loin d'n ❑ o fM d Io ipp Gp ap Q � 1. vi o d u7 a l n7 C3 C3 o to Ep lry I N -•4-- C7 N O [V N C G O 6 cu U� O f to r---- I N N I a o Ip 1 v rn q 1 C � o •o 'o a o C! o .0 0 m o �c •0 0 A M I I 12 a ! I o a Lr, co f lo t loq p a oq N D a 1 a I m a M q f C to r, p a. o lam o 1 I NISI ni O a 4 !4 I O to I qO p � lap v� io 0 LZ LL a 10 �C o I LL l O 4 G I N LL p a to Id go op I� pa Ma l o v o o r p!9 a p r� � Id to sqa roa oe pd al- m to _i ____ f I Z Io Loa o so Io 0 I _ _ I va o I p f 6 m _> o O o to !od QV p Ip F ILS L' ------------ fo �v d I----------- Id to d � o o Ip to to l0 p 0 rn I [ p o to 10 ocn U ao lo �n c �cmy _r__._ n x q 14 I d d 2❑ O r IY F. © 0 Iq t o l o v d C � ro Infer N� III ! cv ni C ❑ O N F U = ;7 N tA El m N o ai ad I• o !q o N z a 14 0 1 p E d f cl ) d q p U o Ina rro n o fM n fC ap Q o Ln f 1. vi o d u7 a l n7 rL C3 v m ti z -•4-- N O C G O 6 m 1 m rn q 1 C yi LO 0 1 N 4 E p M 11n a G m � 10q u7 p q lLa d 1 I M a Lr, co f tti � I 4 D [L o I 4 f C to r, p a. o lam o o 0 1p O �� o joo C. � lap v� uJa w ❑ I I LL l O 4 G I d l o v o o r o a p r� I I ca m to a f I Z Io v I I 11a1� o •' ; � F L' Page 567 0 O N O N e Ch V M rIL m c :n m N [] h D r ❑ N 4 I o 4 z o Iv v v 2 o loo joo p no ❑ f11 0❑ o I ry � M ❑ � ❑ IC I❑ o i [] l o O ❑ ri N O g ❑❑+ N ❑ E O 1❑ O O m p o 0 0 KM r�rs 11 Q---- ❑ c I ni ni r....T---- ❑o IV 7 o_ v r: v N O n to In I I u� 0 u� L11 0 m � ❑ C iI❑4 C c� N o C i o I C o❑ ❑ q u7 7 C1F `a, E I I , ❑O �'7 r p ❑ XfL b N 0o mQ to EN I � I I p � u1 in I I I n _._4---- ❑ � ya � o to Iv a ~ G D O ['1 ❑ 4 o t j❑ � i--- I N I ry m M U ❑ ip !m o IG rN rn N m� C o oa ui > p 4 N I I ILa N v� 4 fn o o o o c li F 2 N ❑ I lm I o V l p m o v p cn ❑ o No U C ' Gp O I i� a U lfl a U In c o c o d ❑ 0 2 u-1 - o I a ! � 4, U Ic a cli1 b ❑ ❑ Ip fa❑ ❑o I I m l no a 07 C ry o � { n ^ � , vi i ai O 1 I �s j LC W p a m LL ;o ~ '� ry 1❑ 1 1 u7 C _0 x o to ro 0 wa' - -r • L m_:-. CV w� a to E6O p �v C I❑ IMC r�7❑ LL dm o l0 1a I ! a o Iq Ipo I� 00 ❑ CL � [p I I u7 ❑ u LL --•-�-�_--� --- LLU a C o 4 0 I I Comm __ �o t I ❑ la I d o to low Qt of �A ❑ Ip rn4 ❑ a] LL rob � I❑ Iv Q � I I X o t o t o o to i4 d a N N o I4 0 110 � t I C) 0 Io ior'l ore ❑ b Ib [nom r`❑ WN C Ib lov W N Q ❑ 2 ❑ o Qa v o O + 1 I I i v a N � � ❑ o Ip foo o❑ CL W C I I ..::::. .. i0 a w' m LJj '� ' M ' C] U _ O N O N e Ch V M rIL m c :n ti N [] h r ❑ N 4 I o 4 z o Iv v v 2 o loo joo p no ❑ 0❑ o I ry � M ❑ � I co ri N O g ❑❑+ E M fv m p a � KM 11 ❑ c I ni ni ❑o IV 7 o_ v N O o •o 0 m I N o !0 all ❑ q u7 7 C1F o O p I , ❑O �'7 r p 4, m M o ❑ XfL b r ob mQ 113 I � I I p � u1 in I N _._4---- ❑ � � I I pN lorry ry ~ G D O ['1 ❑ 4 o v p C i--- I N I ry m M t� a im4 m� Wa�[i ILn oa ui > p 4 N I I ILa N v� 4 o o I o o li F N ❑ I lm I o V l p m o v p cn Q INn No U I i� a U lfl a d jo 0 2 o Ic I I m l no a 07 C ry o � { n ^ , vi i ai O N �s j LC W p a m LL ;o ~ Page 568 0 C U 7 L 0 �f mo N 6 m CJ c �o •c 0 O O Iv o 2 Q p !o b I O O o I 41 = ❑ ❑ j n o a 1 4 I D O o fc�v Z v 16 FO O _ _ p Iry N m o la e ---- N-------- 0 N 1� I f= v o ro to 0 fU U c`i I a ID 0 IVcm o Io !pp as Cy N I �-1 o to p I C7 [m] r I G •o c F-- kn I y N N Iav C $ v rcOp o to Iii � a Q la Z N �I1 o v a O tl j QI N v .___ ..__ __ .i [u� O ma m ry c`�7 0 c o 0 M ❑ o i a o a p a U m o o a o I. a- I O a4 F I p fv Id m Ip m U a n 'an cn u7 tL v I O I v y m v Ip Iva mp s N mm C v o [Nn I 1 N io ;9v n 1 m c LL o I O id Fro W 00 D V) o m"'o ro to a LO ino u C Io Iv v v G I io O i� v C] 1 �o c v F `n In x 2 6 �o v ��ra-a u p t� Q I E m Fvo os � Iv Ir v o i N w i � � w p L) LL � v •G �4 � 'F'� i --'moi'---i __• Q] fA mp � zLU o Iv Ip v v ID Ev 4 7 t� n to Fo a 10 ---- � �e c to Iov dp �a o v U LL a i I m Q7 [o i� w [U x No 'Q 'd o t r m v o v o a o aI v fl N Q c � FF o-- If-. O 4)l O o I v I d W ao Io Fors G�" Im M� v% v fa IN ,y d LU LiJ C ❑ o I v I 0 10 FoG aQ can Ml CS a U F Icy ry CD CV N CD CV C ❑ o i q I p 4 p m q. Fo lop vm > a LU U L E �i _ ? RT m C U 7 L 0 �f Page 569 O O Iv o 2 Q p !o b I O O o I 41 = ❑ 0 j n o M1 O o fc�v rim F _ _ p Iry N m o la e o !0 0 N 1� I cu O I ov a c`i I r�i � I o d G •o c F-- kn I y N N Iav $ o rcOp o a la N �I1 tl I I GY QI v [u� Iry ma m ry c`�7 j M mg o i a LD a. I. a- I a4 O I C, Ip m a n 'an cn 0 tL Ipp I v o [Nn I 1 N n 1 m c LL o I O id Fro W 00 D V) I ❑ i� v C] 1 �o c v F `n In x 2 �o v Q I E m Fvo os � v o i N w i � � w p L) LL Page 569 0 1] Page 570 lit � ❑ [7 ! 0 l 0 0 o fo is a 0 2 4 to fG O 0 G G C ---i.... ir--' n N a U fl1 y a �o boa o0 n, i1t I N r+i ate+ co N 0 F •r--------- m I I m o io IID I rr C a o ja 1M M C p o I o 1 `D Lr9 Q o DC7 �4 a p:0 0 0 o 0 o a C)cu o o o 9 I 0 F In r A I o I P o Q o I� lo� 00 �p Ilp16 m � c L2� IC 10 O O g ra r q`7 � m ci �c`a� o to I�od o Io l0a4 v� � [ti � u.0. "• o � = a j'^ O O la Ita r� uU7 �Q 1 I o jo jo v ❑ xu. o IC7 l0 0 'r- o ! i I� lov oe U r- Ma- ccja jcapQ 00 iD LL x N C,IO I 'Col Ln qd I� [r3 C) LV ❑ U o I o 1 m m 14 tach oM O�a imI nd 0Ip iN N C --r--."r____ LU o (] L I Ecu ri --- CD O [wry CV CD C7 L (7 ❑ 0 l ao t o 0 to Foco0 Q] CV y o Iq Ion oa > ' c 0 _ LU m L a L) 4T 1] Page 570 0 0 Page 571 a cv 4 .0 ID(� .t7 en iG 4 U] [ N N a f I C I O I O 4 I I 4 O N o IQ to a P O Q .. __ .__ N I I � i 4 Id Im d a low iA�i 4om v n No n U I�o Imtl mtl U a ai T G1 1� y NN z V o I n 700 M U CC] w em m �tl tl I� IN LO a1V1 o 0 jLn " o m M F N N C 01 i m O w M C o o I� IN 0 0 0 Q � � 1 ur I U'6 -2 m ry n`r"r N N [] 4 • tl � O D tl O n m d c 6 icc iW n ej c O 11 p p .+! LO 0 0 0 a o _0 a i N C a � I 1 Q �N o IQc'i jov iz Z;�' wLO a ictl low vo %g o 0 --..r--'-r---- C 1 I ---- _ �n o I CD W Oe � p 11n 90 I Q p N CL � 1 I _� m 0 o I vm7 j� ry d� ren r�i Q cL -----_.-� --- -- - f�A �a a ias.+ Iia tlri _ �'4 M a ]oo mo r- r- a LU7. o I� I� LU�" } ?� 3 I n a Iv ju�'i o in ai Co Ip iv o --.-I _ _ _ _ r .... x o ;n 1d O co Q loo lao ooa N � p0'7 0�+ Cy C? C INtl IN4 N� '---r I w ^G N no N Sp I ! - - G 0 17 ire e N N � Q o L M w o a 4 N IU LO_ iii 0 a lm fm vi W r O i I O fN to x O n v rp co V � N � �o �o o ❑ 2 rn m m � r C N 1�/7 C ❑ o Ivd to 0 3 4 U rn C s 10 ❑ .G E. U � Page 571 0 9 Page 572 CL)o •m n 0 .0 a M c of sn ow LC7 Q o I v t o d 2 tl Ip [o O v Io Ic c Q----�`-- I -`- -r ^ n o to Fa v CY 2 O Idt-] Fvc7 o�n O o b U o INO I n� and i� O d id Im go m m vo F 1 0) I4'� uy 11 OU C C Q 2 In I�6 C � 4a 0 .o 0 D U o c c o In d I d 1 eo N L ni o IMo Io 0 0. I 10 P N- - - ^� • ` - -f - - fl wLa aN d i0) Ilm W v IdM Ivy v� 0 d dv C"]lo x4 C? p a to lavv [fl a7 7+n G Io in n Ipl 1 c� a Ino Io c C LL o d- is IvCL {IJ -`�----�---- 5mIm v Im I o m Q] T2� a 4 !O I d G 0 O '10 Io v .1 -_-ir- N �� o IQcn Irv- dri D k2 I^ro iso L W umvi� ov' I� I� 7 ❑ 1 I L) Y o Im Im m CIA 0 o ids Ivo 4v o N N d InviO INO cpev Ica I� Q o i I r•'i a C704 0 0 N d)l a I v I o 0 1 := I I LLI px a I� i� m I ! M U a � C a to Iv c N `, 0 10, m C ipo 0 iry ! N d l 0 ciO a W Iv _ . > r in _ 9 Page 572 0 r:d Page 573 d N C m N yNj d In to v N to io 0 o Io o Io O"--r'-"'r---- N f• 2 v I d l d op lov iov a [LI U po Icp'+,o Ivo r�i� a itn I� 0 a 76 O U Iv rn Q j uuO , n C O C iW IN 0 U m ----� -- --„-- , {] oio p ion o,, � cv o I p o ! o o fl o o I�o Imp rnp ---F----F--- LO � O in In Rni I i O I m o loo in IoN av po !oo xd loo v� 6 �.- I iri 1 N r QT v m N+n �N :n� oI N j m d o ins lov7 ori o fpo '-o mo lirL IN ic”! m i I , � � a5 o Ing !Qci o 9J Zi Ocl I tl n0 CJ L Lu � IQp I[7p � Zvi icp cz ao - o o iocn low o Rl LL � I I N--'-r-'--r---- x�, m o N p I ooN I InL, o� G I p p p o 4 mo CV o IQo Ips I� Irp .._r__..r___ I � _ 0 N N p dl +'i O U o low i� e o lupin to a a j CV cn WLU Ctl 0 p U 7 ! N ---- c N O c in4eo 1�p N [J U o ao -o LU Iw U E U x r:d Page 573 9 0 Page 574 co U ap ry In Q C7 tn NJ` I I oto is p 1 O 0 4 ---^s--"'�---- A vI m i 1 V N V o f l o n 100 d I M t o n p y Y �, I ui rV 1� U rir 0 o �� �� ry fco CIA 0 a o n C cm 0 I J d mo Q c o •o o D U o .o o o _p CJ U LO I I o ! F y y a goo i0, co r`, W v] I I N IU] 1RICL N O G?r� Ln e'i Q IpQ IE �O ani 'O wal o lip low p4 p I In l irico 4 Qq ❑� Qi 47 ave a I4� i�M �� C u'. 'f- •F- i F a m j°n'o o O a� o EpQ I N I W go a Q-.._r-------- 47 0 > lu xa loo jm m loln l4�n a4 oo NQ rear ❑ 14a Icy �r � po IoM IQM Q m� I rn a 1 M o o v In -------��-- LL N Q a I m i m it 0 ! Gp I a Ln 00 N N o Ia to O ['7 F o0 I mCY r- o C7 C, 4 0 o r3 ❑ to Iia a o D z --^-�-^--�^--- LJ C N U I J I d E m N 2 i U r rn iLpi/4 inopop CQ � o C4 H o �+ C i i" d N G7 U U a GS ro ,� _ M mi w =§U Page 574 .w CV u7 0 N 0 CV N id 0 N Cr] Ca N C0 C LU _w m U C O �1 b LU LL! m U 0 Ll 0 U D z T V N O U c6 H 'o M ,a Q d o v I a I o 0 4 0 f C C 1 o, I om to C� 2 � I rp n n I I,y n +o to n t o 'o a 0 0 q d I o ro 0 ca a t o m o R t Q ! to w O O f Cl a IQ v t a r to m p d I p G 2 nea j4 �yv r 01 I R7 m oa Ia Qr7 F o C1l� r� ry G cn I N 1tI 1 r I -"-r'--- w I I m 0o I do I n a I I r o I c ! o ^ ! Ip G f O � r o I 1 G I6l 4 40 00 M 3 o o a Im Q 4 ~ Page 575 oa R ~ CL La N C L 1 n U � t C O Y f+ LT C G 07 'o M ,a Q d o v I a I o 0 4 0 f C C 1 o, I om to C� 2 � I rp n n I I,y n +o to n t o 'o a 0 0 q d I o ro 0 ca a t o m o R t Q ! to w O O f Cl a IQ v t a r to m p d I p G 2 nea j4 �yv r 01 I R7 m oa Ia Qr7 F o C1l� r� ry G cn I N 1tI 1 r I -"-r'--- w I I m 0o I do I n a I I r o I c ! o ^ ! Ip G f O � r o I 1 G I6l 4 40 00 M 3 o o a Im Q 4 ~ Page 575 :w N Cr? It O CM C] N n N N [b fC C C Q Q U N iS3 O U O 0 LO= D tI� d C CV CD D7 cn Qi C m CL Ca d D a_ (D V7 O U Q] (] x N Cp C] N 0 0 2 W LU M U i 7 O 2i Lu LU [d U 0 N 0 0 r U CV � � NI N c U mi! M Zj m cn 0 11 O 2 O O q I o to v 0 G 16 O d 3 C7 C I o im y o IDa oa o l o p p v O Inv Lo �' ! G f m � p N LV I o !m m a I g N d N N A. O o •0 0 I b l o v Q a I v v c o [o co 1 o j�o Wo v f caOD I I t 1 f m y I v on c v lop ov l�n� rnp d W I OG V pO � I v o O f d p p Im � f f I I I 'ao aQ od o� f ! O 4 I d d I I r� to ip 6 �0 0 I m �^o e I � c 1 m c O Page 576 o � g o N G m� w° >b 7 " LL a Q N C �1 o SC _0 O [] U L N � C C1 � V 07 L L4 L p vi =)I O O q I o to v 0 G 16 O d 3 C7 C I o im y o IDa oa o l o p p v O Inv Lo �' ! G f m � p N LV I o !m m a I g N d N N A. O o •0 0 I b l o v Q a I v v c o [o co 1 o j�o Wo v f caOD I I t 1 f m y I v on c v lop ov l�n� rnp d W I OG V pO � I v o O f d p p Im � f f I I I 'ao aQ od o� f ! O 4 I d d I I r� to ip 6 �0 0 I m �^o e I � c 1 m c O Page 576 0 C O a .2 C 0 TU Y 0 Page 577 CL CD O to o 1p p o 1 p 0 0 a CV r I I n CV v S U o c t o f 4 0 I I C, op0 Ip lop o l0 104 0� m rte• --- -- 4 N N _ �a a I I m to �m w C a Ip !� ~ N N C p o to Ip�y C {) C p o O ❑ C) o o a � a � 6 O o p c rid [J o ! I is low oa in p Iq 1 p a ni i co m 0 ----F ---- � ---- LO D N u 4 I I p O ["] xxa- u fd Ioo 00 CV 47 [� a U7 t'N a op 10 I v m fg Iaa ov o o �5 CL (a I I o7 ri U a ra n I F r� r7 t o l0 0 DJ iLED p `Q Amo mo I f IQ�n ON D tzi xa p o I p I p q p 4 Io Iaa v Lu c - - :=. p I, m Io lr' cm o v an o kL p q I --'^r---- Q} x a t o f d+ N O N is ioa a� 04 04 Q1 ❑ a po I0 I m Io IqM ori p (n Ip F-0 me ( 4 f I ri ri W I , W C r C,p 0 Q Ipv qv [] m cU ----R------ ❑ N V ++ N C C) Q o a po l a I m m Ip Ipa pp I p ! fl o0 0 47 0 C o oo to Iva pp U r I ui wa r U,= Cyp] T �> �� F M =) C O a .2 C 0 TU Y 0 Page 577 0 4) M �0 G 0 4) CL 4 0 Page 578 m i --- on va!0�c0 C e {1I O In I� -r-- __' 1 C11 r n n I o j cr y 10 loo 00 loo Qv F Ido 0 ''0 � o =❑ la 4 r C N o a •o 0 0 a o 0 is ap (] a ion Ian NC a a 14 I LO L� C, 1p Ip4 p0 CJ kq la an In CV 0)) O ❑7 cz m 00, LLmu a p (z I ! . to la o 1 I ra n ja Ima !�o O In I� m �4 r 1,6 G 0 Iv na vo I la lao on s of I I 1q v- _ 1007 � 1 ?2 °0 a ro x I I I o I rts u N in loin a pv CD I G I d m on 'n Ino on a sn CD a Q s M LU LU❑ C37 I o I m to Ion a 0. �a I0d U 00 b 0 -Fo---I -� C II i eri ui LU L Q [ff Q '� •v � 7 . � F 4) M �0 G 0 4) CL 4 0 Page 578 0 0 ro N 6a E C7 tt Ia. 0 d a LL R 2 a w o ;n ;Ln ;In v a 0 1p T EC'o:m;a Lf7 IL o ,o CD N fC:3 ---F N CP 0 cn c ' a x U a 1 Q Q 1Q 1 D7 ' I 1 Ili i Lf7Qj C} 1 p cs7 �. e --F•-_. Z � 0 U oo' o' o 1 6 ' ❑ [D C N ry rtf t1 ' 1 1 U 1 ' CD CD m CD v � 1� � 1 r � 1 1 1 U qC I p ; 4 Q 0 m , . 1 f f 1 U' •Z •� • C 0 U N � , J • �1 o 0 -0 N.25 • [0 � 47 LJ o o a O7 ` LL �_ ' • q 0 : .� � RT [Si u 0 N 1 D c1 O 1 O 1 to O i a L`2 0 1 C4 I p 0 -2 W a ND iND Q m (D p fp cd LL a c Io 1 7 �� na row C 1 10 4 v r � 1 LL O 1 O 1 o Q I Q o N cn �o Inc 1 CD ❑ 1 o ,o n r� 0 LLJ1 LLI C] n 1 ra Z I r ' LJ O f] In co 0 1 v 1LL� LLJ y d W rn id ; m U 7 0 ro N 6a E C7 tt Ia. 0 d a R 2 a w o ;n ;Ln ;In 0 1p T EC'o:m;a IL 2 O � p 1 � • � CP 0 cn c ' a x U I I 0 1� Io :a Q 1Q 1 D7 ' I 1 Ili i Lf7Qj 1 1 � 1 1 � Z U oo' o' o ' ❑ [D 0 t1 ' 1 U 1 ' CD CD m CD 0 V I V 1 m 1 CD (n a7 1 co Cd ' 00 r I 2 1 1 � 1 r � 1 1 1 U qC I p ; 4 (O IW 1 cp .(0 C) rD 1 6 1 ID ' ,6 ~ 1 1 1 f f 1 U' •Z •� • • ❑ ) N � , J • �1 -0 N.25 • [0 � 47 O O7 ` LL �_ ' • q 0 : .� � RT Page 579 'p o O i O 4 u7 Q 1"'0 10 10 m O "7, p ' d 1 0 a to D i p 1 4 I o O CI io io iv C jm 10 Q N S {n I In , U.) ! u� CD 10 io 10 O 1 d I I �~+W) +0 1 � 1C1 1 r j i � I Liz I N 0] o 'C 1p 10 10 l p I q ! v o Io �C t Q j CLr�7 � CN'y + �1nLn r] f U QclI I n T 1� 10 i w ❑ y o to to 1 1 W I d 1 a _ I !1 Q N 1 cm " NI N W W O I O 10 ! p fO NTEM cm � � O Q 1 r7 1 0 1 0 J � x o 10 1 0 f o cu a. � 0 cn 1(O 1tD i� Ir !r Ir •O O f � 1� � � O 117-�Li' � Ln u"] C J c•] r''i Im 1C Ico 1rm �I i I F• c0 [n 2 �m f co I 1 1 -CD 1 i C*] o a 10 1 o O _2 c7 ii ��c2 -p d c�m ca . Lh -j L j . Lq Imo! ISP] w 4 CD W ..F..q. .t.. U m '� ' m C t 'Zo N ;o � L7 [d ' J . t • [ytl ' 6f r N y IG 0 4 C Q • Y Ix LU Z _vr U ❑ , D 0 V mis � n a. F N N n r - r p C Q ; p- . N ! I `7M Ipr7 fmm op lam ina �t�.o La Iw Iry ,rd r 1 , o I ! m 1 4 0 d 10 Imo ��a �C �" -Fco a f a to JM a a m 1 rri n In 1`r IQ o p p o + A 1 I I c to to ro 1 4 I ^ I 4 1� 1 0l a to 16 to I I + ---F----F----F - I I jv o !a fn +o o Ica to ra 1 1 I I + 1 i r I 1 F 1 I I + t I 1 C a l4 - p to Iv Im I ! 0 o is to 10 o o f C O I q I I I � I I 1 I 1 1 I I I Im id 1 1,0 N O I 1� rW --- r----r-'--F--- i 1 , I i fo to E _ I 1 I - I I l0 10 I I � I --`�----r----F--- i r , i r 1 IQ ro i f� 1p 00 n '2 ;2D Page 580 0 Page 581 � 9 'p •V 'ili rr4j C3 � Ip pan as gN, 2 0 to ICp70 !ag m N -----+0 Uo rP It III N tti p I c 'Ind' r�i O t o I I ----- ___•-__�I --- OC, in L _�__..1_ Q o 4 0 c 7, ~ �.•�*.......... • C A 4 I t '� I 1 o to o app G U +- a Ip ,o IO1 p _ U M R, a o 10 i 4 j Q 4 L L o I p I p IOD p W p p p t M p O LL C) n I I I f 2 CV L al m e I d 14 I a CJl �n 0.h[mo [ C I Q I C p - k-4 Irl 0 N o 6 f O 1 D m Ol d� p 1p p C V; >I I i A � N LL I r I ' o I� ;Q m UQ IIom a 1$ icq Sap as ED fp mo x ty N 4 14 Ivo � Cl? Ue � I 1 CD i I o to m Im to ifb ip c Q i6 IC ip G 4ip LU N Q I j aio ,a j�a to kn iv U _ Er 0 Id loo a y y�.:�syr:::. .. • Q m Z, , I m i v m y m I N + I p 0 L---------- C L Gi N ' O .a2 0.12 LLI LL!C r ul d IE . ° .m m ' z C _ r � s • � { C :: 2 EE m mm U04 r m D¢ Lf; Page 581 0 0 Page 582 IM CV O '6 O V 6 p N � o la �m jm m O �p Fd I�d lod 4 O I I d p n p o la 'o Fa 0 N U po j6 �tnno spa my Cl N CV U R a l a t J rG'� :2 l F C7 O I [D p F�r� kc e 0.7 �`� p Id 'u� Ira7 r° [� a f a 1 F€ tp C! 2 p C C) U C b � C I I tG o U N N a 1 G tO 4 1c .P IU c ----� - ' 0 ra ,p Id a -3 �' jp Iq lea 0 ujA v 1!]_ CV f I f 0A I I t G7 W 17„1 Cry - c o rg ,o Fuad. a I CLS A� a c �- cCL M o ------r----�---- p_ j v ioo 0 1I O LA I t � LL 1 t I I o t o o v V 0 I po Fa ��Q Foo ryo A N N i6 U n 1 1 o t l a o 4 t v I t? v C7 Vr F 1 I a � o ID gar 1m v ul o W W Q] N C7 a ao I dp in F m p Io ,a f4v u: Id � !z d 1p joo 0 (D= F-. p ; o l al o tp ro w m I 'fl, + . p 0 13 m coiC O v. m W Q] C d 7 " '-� wnr�r•N D m m _W W � Vl�C �m�Ri �m u m ' oiL rr i -c°r CC F ® .y m is i`miz 0. cL 0 Page 582 CL N d N CD N n iU [Si Q CV LD ii N �i O m N L,? N 7 O 2 Ll1 LL] C W ! N C .N J Imo N a, pr} Z ats� W G7 cQ o LU o lo_ ] r�4 i UCl) to ui 0 0 Page 583 N O m c� N N Imo on j�a pr} Z a loo 1 Som cQ o o lo_ ] r�4 i �fp r� 1 L6 r -i to a o to !n to p !6c IQ IcGa 4 S c� i No a D o �� c m 1 1 Il. ! w 1 of O o •vv • i � was.• r¢ � a •�n � 'ate r° C c 0 Page 583 Page 584 a. N C7 N O N E- N 0] C� [[f C C T C 7 U N (6 ❑ U t 0 Ln a r� o m O a N � a m Imo, tv c d- ra 0 u m q i II.. d] N ❑ t ❑ j W a Ln C3 o lo18- oa N 'J. Q iq ftp I"?q do I ____i..._�____{ 2 0 L �. 7 a o i m ; m I m O Iqp n q qo T T7 G7 imp a LU LU W d aI U o jo ' !q a Q y o Irn i'�t' fa m y Im n i ❑ a r to Q1 Y o rN i o� :NCD w 0 -a __L..__Lry____ ---------- Q7 V.LU LLI a a s z t p a ' ''ry 2 i+ i[I 111 :JJ is f m C C -6 R L 4i7 � [a Page 584 LJ Q o �a � I O O c 10 Io a �o N ' o la 1 m o Fo IpI va Ia Ion o� ~ = o o E a o N U oo lo, 1 q � a Id l0 0 id g o^ ❑ D U m iv I Iv 100 G U a o o 1n lom an o E a Q fn fn 2 co e 1a D t o ! cQ m ❑ Q o 0 7 U ❑ o o .a o a o v M _ � � ❑ ff 1 E o� p la I m o FalaN m y a lo,n o Ip Ipo a I o ! a o S d � 1 I 1� 0o of acv o t o I a to lon N !7 m E o'n Eo, c'7 on a w co ,aa ❑ !oo ! v CD E } fry 1 I 'a Da � � 4. i I I I a 16 {) rF oQ ion Eon cii b Qa 1 I N m Cl fao o to ao o o a0 a0 0 oo' I� a I I i 5 f U N 'L 1 1 I N 1 X t i] a E a 0 1 0 rn o 1 0 I la o _-__'---- ��__ m m NID 1 Cf I I v y a 0 ni f ni I fru W W I i O f O a'on z av goo U I Ind oQ [V 1 N ❑ O m �� fT la I n l Q a o a Irl 1 v N a is rnio c WS -I ..:I m W ro � v o' M rn EM LJ Page 585 o I to a � I O c 10 Io 0 o la 1 m o Fo IpI va Ia Ion o� q � a Id l0 0 id to lo`"' o I � o^ o p v o I o I m o m o I Iv v o 1n lom an o 0 4[l D t o ! cQ m a . O o a b o a o v M _ � wyr*yyr�*yw-. I I o F" p la I m o FalaN m y a In U o Ip Ipo a I o ! a o 00 no d C, I o I I 1� 0o of acv o t o I a to lon m on a l0 XIL !oo ! v } fry 1 I Da I I t1� a l0 lap oa 1 I R� o to ao o o a0 a0 W� oo' I� a I I 1 I I la o _-__'---- ��__ I I v y a 0 I fru I Qo ❑ Z I Ind oQ I n l Q a o a Irl 1 v N a is rnio c -I ..:I 2• ro � v rn EM F i�V ,tea C Vl d U Page 585 Page 586 I:& ° 04 ---�..--.--.- ° b--..'-------- g [ .. �ca a 9 --'----`---- _� ( � l M _ _Q� _� _. 3 ] |/ k / :0 |� CR ---|----�-.-- U) e ,c �& 6 m] _ ,� .o k |§ ® § � ® tz ---.[---.R---- ` cr) q) an - /03 L0--.- --- ---- \ , / & q \&m all \ AL |2 |§ 8 g ± ----� .--'-..- [` I& ) k \ Ilp Lu |k .k M \ a- u - 8 0 | ;e m � •3 � 2 ----�----�/.-- ¢ j \ ---�.---� w , ,A E A 83 \ � ---[----�.--- � � a � o �ƒ ( — § � Q c 7 & [ �/§ ui 2 7 2 & - ,E :\ / k / k o R R Page 586 N In 6 N O N n N 6 CV C] c4 C7 N C❑ C LU LU m U C LLIa N Q7 I1J cc C] Page 587 4� `� CN'7 • [N•9 C�•7 rn ~ O O I ----h----t----- o to o to 1 C I I I M c Q D m v Q I c C Iq I ' 0 I I o to 1 i V m � W b fa a LM o �o 0 � C - _ � ... -r----+--- ----------- Page 587 v 4 . 4 C�•7 rn ~ O O N ----h----t----- 1 C I I I M c Q D m v Q I c I 1 o �o 0 - _ � ... -r----+--- ----------- rNr•� W i� M o IN L c Fav O ...-1... f C c, a a C I I ca • • O d . r N C�0 � Cr . •� N C C) R 6- a d m m Page 587 N C7 CD N LV I m ro D o �o ino Ip 1 I w 7., im Irn a) N I � L7 C � v I o to iM lrgi N D � > T M C I q 1to jLn ri W m C'b 10'a 1 0 a u6L6 N I m ro o �o ino Ip 1 I C 7., im Irn I � L7 p to fn IM n I o to iM lrgi � D � � o o i M C I q 1to jLn ri C'b 10'a 1 --L"..L.. — - N Q3 6 U a N — N f0 f M _� h• ro ❑ m m m N d CC rI L Page 588 Page 589 N C7 N Q CV r - R1 [ff C C Q 7. C O U N Q U L Q U) O 1O C C7 "2 ❑ L r� M C C] Q7 G7 � Q1 C CL U) U R7 O L V7 Q L N rd n [.7 N o CD ;oX ;m ;m F�� in u� - - h - - 1 - - -----t 0 o Ip I� ,p to p jc� �� o I v f O z o r o CO W N p p o j o !fin I to r+ p I --' F rp `� to ^ 11J n eLU n_ a 1 o fo n U P^ LJ CLico :W } L ---- ` r ��❑ LLJ WG m G �. -po 61 7 I N W- N D g 'c •� CAC a U t6r A C.•CrC F N C D Q a y m m ;Z Page 589 W N U7 It Cp N 0 N n N OJ cl 0 Cr 04 V m 0 _o C 0 M 0A1 CL r� 0 CD CL 7. LL EL ❑ U 1ti I1 a c� lz P � w r Q a W o 'o Lr? ' vii o .o C i ❑ m � ❑ Page 590 0 to 'a 'o 0 O ! p f 0 6 O t !1 l11'�I/ !co 0 � [1} ❑ U O J Dn o Fa kw =m � o !o Im •m m F2 i 0 ; Q+ 1 0'i Q1 _ 1 O y n a `n iv v m o 0 C N ' A a Z 2 � y Cr'cr� F V m 0 _o C 0 M 0A1 CL r� 0 CD CL 7. LL EL ❑ U 1ti I1 a c� lz P � w r Q a W W lE C i ❑ m � Page 590 Ci CD 0 w w M U c ❑ CQ C w LU m U 0 0 Page 591 � � E Page 592 § % $ n ee ee ee � E 7 � ! ; �2 k |o / tLn mi �w ,\ �/ S k / § |\ |n -- �-• �--�-- , k . ; 7= ;m i .c 2 d \ J & C:) �/ § � A , c! - i- - i - -- } $ \ k E |cr 0 k / 7 | k ' .0 y , Z ■ / a 3 £ \ '0 �A ;S k \ 2 2 / = k e§ 'IA �) ,& •m a o z e m ■ ,G ,_o ± 0 \ k k 2 \ ! ƒ / ° tm ® 6 1i 7 \ R . . .. § -° @ m 0 k I§ G E O \ � c \ k § / E u :-n 2 ■ �2 k S £ / £■ t @ u� § _ CD \ d / - 2 \ _ }) ' \ $ 2 \ ) ;/ }) ( & § E / \ { }\ }) \ \ k / �\ 2 * 2 in @ L)& 0 /:/.O ■ / 0 \ 'G .I o \ :/ .ƒ . & ; 2 E uj -C .E N § � O A i § ' ) '� �� = a o _ ■ t g 5 3 a §_ k q k / \ M o it _ > Page 592 0 ii V- 0 n ai clf O Iv •C�•� m c m . ,m ,m ' ' ° N cm N CV ' " ' N N N N N 2 in .Ir7 7. I I I I F I I Y I I 1 I I i I O N q� io i i i 6 4o i i I O 1 F I I i 0.7 � Cj i O r 00 107 I � I OO I � 107 D '- I :T7 m t I I i I I L � I I F I I 1 [SS I I f I I f I }.. Q d N U m 0 m li ' ii i7C sEv r6 ro a' k• � H . � 7 U EQ Cr F � �� . ' d 'r ;r -I ;� .� �I ;n =5m N CrJ [D Q LU W U H � N � N � N • N 10�}-- z 0' m m Q1 N m, m i! J J an d • L F•,n �> �! �J �� �j N CE C V) a C ❑ N Ct1 O Q t 7 ❑ L? co C co C 6] r37 C m Q C [Sf co ❑ AR, N N 71 ❑ [d v ❑ ❑ x C'7 LD CD CV -C3 LU LU cu (] tl1 4 LU LLI Ez U 9 40 O1 N m n �ro n W d m C J Iv o a Io a o Iv o I In m to � I � lo 1N r N Y N r: u� LO Irug m I � at r� � ri epi n I en n r: u� Jri o7 nen a 'o Qp0 I a IN 6 � E 0 N I r^ c4 I I 1 m Iw m Ico N Q Irn O N C N I a Jn 40 w 1 9)I ry a mi � o vi N 1 N to I� rvf 1 o I cV EO J rn Itmn m w N G N 1 LO Iw n � Iv J Q Im o I v 14 0 E I co Itn n a N I_w N 1 I in a w I Em co v, I l7 a I m CV r a IT rn I ci rJ Iv v 3 N E g Page 594 O � 0. •- Q L 0. N � o r1 O N C7 [7 0 i O C] 13 i O1 N m n �ro n W d m C J Iv o a Io a o Iv o I In m to � I � lo 1N r N Y N r: u� LO Irug m I � at r� � ri epi n I en n r: u� Jri o7 nen a 'o Qp0 I a IN 6 � E 0 N I r^ c4 I I 1 m Iw m Ico N Q Irn O N C N I a Jn 40 w 1 9)I ry a mi � o vi N 1 N to I� rvf 1 o I cV EO J rn Itmn m w N G N 1 LO Iw n � Iv J Q Im o I v 14 0 E I co Itn n a N I_w N 1 I in a w I Em co v, I l7 a I m CV r a IT rn I ci rJ Iv v 3 N E g Page 594 Z a_ �[7 O N a N n N d E E Q C 0 N t O Co ❑ N C 2 Q [� E CD O7 tm m [d � CI] U Q] Q ❑ y ❑ N 111 IU x N C7 Q CQ C w LU Cd U C Lo Qi ❑ U., ui cu U C = OL 0 0 a R 0CM; cq 7 0 �I b a _ r w 'D ao �v 0 o m m a) --- Ln Ln I o I 0 tP I q -- "r r - - ' I I oq to I� _._J.---„___ ! I � G I I N04 N O I m f6Ni cq O Cv r1 lo !n o c -P I o I N IEO In w q Q C4 N P tP I6N+ w, T_ N. [•l I I ao jG Ln IQ IG o I 1 I , �c 1^ i^ o !P I7 O I I I I P c I I m I� IN n t ! N , r cN I^ jP CNO v� 0 0 r____ r I I : v -J N I JN N 4 I yo I In N m r� 0 I m p 0 0 o j� �4 vii N W O ? p I I o v E a I.n �c ma j"n� Ci lq Ib7 � I [ I m M1 r] iO =N Q N IP IP CV I I m Q3 :w Page 595 N -- N � CL N W R i a tv C� La o � aF R m r wa � _ LC. CAyo O O b z C 0 (Q 0Y fv 0 T _ r w 'D ao �v 0 o m m a) --- Ln Ln I o I 0 tP I q -- "r r - - ' I I oq to I� _._J.---„___ ! I � G I I N04 N O I m f6Ni cq O Cv r1 lo !n o c -P I o I N IEO In w q Q C4 N P tP I6N+ w, T_ N. [•l I I ao jG Ln IQ IG o I 1 I , �c 1^ i^ o !P I7 O I I I I P c I I m I� IN n t ! N , r cN I^ jP CNO v� 0 0 r____ r I I : v -J N I JN N 4 I yo I In N m r� 0 I m p 0 0 o j� �4 vii N W O ? p I I o v E a I.n �c ma j"n� Ci lq Ib7 � I [ I m M1 r] iO =N Q N IP IP CV I I m Q3 :w Page 595 0 0 0 Page 596 n� LL N p � 2 0 fC7 p O Z o N U v In .� 4] V Q o o C43) m 0 a I� VJ O U _ham �h o cV ❑ I I I r I NN � o I r I I I I Tln Ti �ru7 1M N v f I f ! I ❑ J � I I ! I ! U G r I F 1 r E3 I -r---r---r---r---� - - U) wa co C+1 in L7 s i 4 e o, - p -2 _:. ni o 'n N lO ID Int IN Fp Lid c •. 74 u. LL N IN 1N Iry IN IN I� 1R I� ,-� 10 CD 0a ( rC_y m IC] IC7 f J. s0 U) 4r o i I i j I ' B [l I 16 I I I CDg N �c jN ICV F ccv j� � u7❑ o I 1 I r L =� 0 I 1 I () ma (� LL Q1 I i I i1 1 1 1 1 I U i I i6 Q7 p d I 1 1❑ 1 I j I❑ q] rn cu -z- ❑ l cL + d 1 6! 1 C:I= a O1 I L) 1 I c I c 1 ✓;7 I m oc, a p U � a c I C N ' 4 O 0 2 v w G o 0 z ❑0 O 4] m t a_ o ro 4 Q ' U • D y � ❑ O C C I� ' 4f Em ° m u 0 3 L V Lo w 0 0 Page 596 0 0 q 0 N C7 N n N r] 00 'p 'a '1• 'n0 'p 'n ' 'v 'v 't'7 'C7 ' V '� 'C7 '(rny 'N 'ti �M ,1 im ,� ,� ;co 76 i' �U a ' p ' p ' 1 p Q 1 p . p ❑ p ' 0 p a O b p ' p ' • p ' q Q LL O m � tv' ire _;rp -!rn -.O !cu '- �n Iao 'd,r' frl tI] IT =rCu ;�' i ioo I.vv i°i ! i°' foo !rn i� ! jch 'm im In i~ i^ to -1--1'-1--1--1--1--1^-1--1--1-- I I �..� O 14 ip I O ip 1 O O p 'co •b '❑��- p .m _ I IO 1 rq I 1 p I O I p I p r Q p p W ' [O •00 'rp W ' 00 ' W 'cl n '¢l 'CO •r• '� •fC '.6 'r6 I •Lp '� ICO 0 _ I )co r I ' r ro r I C\) 'p I 1 , 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 f k +� I ' � I �-_r.._-r.__--r'„_-T__-.'r-__T««Y-_-i.,»_+__ C Y I I� 1 I mI ! I 1T ! I 1 1I I 1 1 1 I 1 I C I 1 I i 1 I I ! I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I f I f I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I Q V 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I •0 II I I I I 1 ! 1 ! 1 1 1 r I 1 ! 1 1 I r 1 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I i i i --1--1--1----�-_1__.•[.__1__1__1__1__ 1 I ' 1 I 1 I ' ' ; + I I ❑ 1 1 1 � I 1 � � � � I I ! 1 1 r 1 � (iZ., C ? 1 'Iwo N I d 1 1 1 � N r 1 1 0 1 1 1 1❑ 1 1 1 1❑ 1 0 1 1 t 1❑ I Q1 I U , W I N 1 1 i v1 1 I v 1 1 1 1 1 1 U m ll.l ` 1 14 !❑ I 'o,I C I w 1 I a t [] l y '❑ + r N cc -0 ' '-0 ' 1 ; 1 1� 1 a 1 1 1 1 ti 1 ` C i ' N r❑ 1 C . N 1 N '❑ ' ',f ,❑ 1 b i 1 •� r 1 o C' .t 1 1 'Qj ; O I F ' 1 I Q 1 I F 1 1 1 1 0 I J 1 re 1 I tr r 1 I Q. ; 1 ! y ; 1 r [� ' 1 I N 1 N l y 1 1` N 1 1 1 L 1 I N I 1❑ 1 l l y r❑ f I 1 C N + d y m w 1❑ l y I I I I y 1 C• 1 !,� 1 1 1 '> r a r I V I C 1 1 91 I �' l a i 1 C ❑ I O V '� 1 N ❑ 1 x 1 7 1 7 1 f X E ' N 1 I C I 1- I L) N ' 17 1 7 r 1 1 O �tttt 1 U u............ ~ ; W LUU N Z Q] > N ❑ a o a • • m N 1❑ w C C C C ' C Ip '❑ O 6 O ftl LUL) 'U 'U '[] 'U cm 01 m !A QO m V C C C C C C C ' ' 61 ❑1 • m ' D1 0] ❑ ❑ 'o m rn 'C7 •t7 'C7 '� 'm 'm 'm 'm 'm a 'a •4 '¢ Hl Page 597 C j W W mas UF- N W m r n n Qf roTi F- :F -- V � 2q •2 •2 �C3 C%j [`J N --h---h---F---F---r - - N I � C3 % I x_ I x_ I X . M � M � 4 Q a IF IF rl > �s r L] 1 1 1 1 1 f I I O n m n 1 I C i 1 N � � I ^2 1 rd 1 T2' 1� 1� ❑ n n n [fj 1 1 1 1 i 1C1 eO I Q, n C71 -j p I p I Q I -iz FyC O I d q 1 0 1 0 I q 1 0 1 0 N 114 'N , Id ry O Ip U 5 ID I 1 1 1 I o 5 r 1 I 1 ❑ 4 �-^ �--4--- Pr-- -' Op] pp7 Qp7 vdi_ cd I pdi In e t 1w I In I p 1 cp r rmtm r 0 N ❑ 7 I I 1 I RN In I o J11 �-FcD nC F- Id +14G i.' (D v1 !Y Ir I I av ih m 7 i I i f LLa co I I w r I ,f0 -- ' O• 10 (DF-� .e 4 I Ip Ip d �d �o �p � p 10 pwG � o m u � m ko 'Q 1 r 1 1 L =m :a1 �z 1 1 r co'P ❑ Q q ; q p 4 , O 1 p o to a w I p t .o a :ci to a m ILLL d a �ep ioY ire p�j x Q ~ io Lri j� IN 4LLn I N -- i [dm I m m N - 7 � rp I n I co I a7 I [d I r I I f I +. Oi ❑ u'r In I U) �.. ❑ n n I I I 1 C % N NW FE I I 1 I ii Q 0 N ry r cl N, i i i i 1 N CD U -`- , M o : ro CD N M i eq a o. v ? ++ E o m ; _' rn c a) � L � F C7 ❑ '0 'm 'a 'a co)ri S Page 598 0 d) tS 0 Page 599 o 0 v a N d a . a UD kq W U o o .m Imp I I tV f I 4 __j ---- __.---- It m m a o or o N U o 1 a ^ 40 o ❑ a9 !C1 1 N N U o 1v 1� 1 I E U O IC) iN N O o 1 0 1 u7 v] ] I � v o $ a ❑ u ❑ a U m � ❑d I I N 10 F LO 0 j0 �O 6 '2 f4 10 G IL I ] N HLn a Fo CVG -2 X� X v la laa cv co i i Itr a I o I It7 us til h 2 o ] O 1 C o (b G U. a 10 10 0 c m m a 1 G X w m V IL o 1 o i m vo a l 0 0 a 1 �] 0 1q f o a I I ri ro y O w°- � ---r---- ----_ N 'o � r ! I to jn n ao 1 ao f m m eia Ir ---- - ^ --i-.. QJ 1 ! �{ 0 1 a F d6 t o 1 v m a, U] a IQ Ina n4 IN! C'] i I Q] O N n a 1� o CO N v =o �o c 0 O I 1 W W C H p o o cn u7 a 10 1vNi N p .. 0 v U V 1Q Fa ---- CD 3 ! d 04 iov 1m rn = O oo 0 1 o F c9 m ¢ o c 0 is io W W lu vi 5 d) tS 0 Page 599 C C% c n t C ft m a C a` w Page 600 CL Q 2 f I N I .� ti N a o to fo 0 aj � f I ui ui Ip Icu N Fv Iq I� p o { v I N D ❑ o C) m 0 U o la to v rj jo j0 0 d I I u7 �N r I p l o ! CD m 07 EU 2F q to req N G0 wa Cil II1 �.� p 1 4 r O 4 q m o Iq o t o f- m O CI] o Iq I m xa- j� O w I I� m •�� W � Iqo ren -r- j[ ry o f n I n F I r7 c ¢ I o I o c d p N Cr] I !fig n Q ❑p I q I M 6 ^D C4 -0 LT 14 = m q i0 iC O t+ I LU w 0 o to rq Z p O O d U = q cV 0CD .._ pN V o^ Im c, •.i � lto o rp Iq e > w E w m d - 5 C C% c n t C ft m a C a` w Page 600 WE Itt 1p It d iV O N n LV �7 m N 0 d 0 tm LIU IL CV Cp O N 0 2 LU Lia m U C 4 N (D C0 C W iia f� U Q7 E E m U) 7-. C Q C7 Z5 D U r O U] 0 _C 2 C 47 U] "Zi 0 m ^ 4 O G Lq 1j U c 0 I I I 0 1 2 i 1 � Ico m I f a a I I Io 10 1 I M 0 0 D jG 0 0 V o G to ICV [V 4 p jLn cfl � 1 1 efl ro co N.. --- .I ----I---- 0 — 4 10 o Ip Iv, a m m m � m F 06 N N N '0 ••-t__--r-.. 0 U G o Ip I� l0 1� u7 a 0 m o I p I ri z rrr*�yy I Im CV 1 ne 0 0. f CV 4 I m I I m m �Cu � I f F O o io Iw a � 0 to Io 0 o jG jG c I ?G ry I C �2A� vi I Obi, Ll- i0. 1 I it rn P Ip i , 0 Imp NDN a Op 33Ja o OL m - - - - - - - - - - - - IN N I I I m _ •aa o la 10 0 I?4 Q io Q I m l o 0 I to Ip I C4N { O I G 1 N N g� 0 I to I m LL¢ N p 1 4 I o I v W M n CLO m 1 G I Nn N I a W o I IMS I m I cyI � r _ _ _ I I 'n 0 Ir U 1 cr n- D o I o I np jd rcv 0 I N Fo >< N O l 0 1 6 v Lo z 2 p p �� X 04 D O 1� I� $N [+1 I LO .0 I Qo I Io O(.7 0 I I CC, o In =t m m o o 10 C N I 1 M d � O zZ o 10 I� Ip l0 0 v 0 a L� o in in v I I U o I4 Im I i p � o to to o v 0 -1----A--- 16 6 C G = . ❑ 7 r U 2 0 Page 601 ^ 4 U c 0 I CY 2 1 I 1 l � Ico m D jG v o i6 p jLn cfl nLo 1co co --- G c l co m m m � m 2 - r; '0 0 m p 4 rrr*�yy I Im CV CV I ^ 0. f CV I I I m m �Cu 1� r d I o O Fli 0. 0 N N _r I I ?G ry I C �2A� vi I Obi, Ll- i0. OL m IN N I _ •aa I o 1n r M oO d p W 11 l to I g� 0 I to I m LL¢ 1 O IM f n u] l o C o 0 r _ _ _ 'n 0 Ir U 1 L'+ f .- I N �V >< Iv a z 2 IN N 1� a U I LO .0 la � I N M d � O v 0 L� Page 601 E O N Q i11 c1 m L a RT Page 602 C 4 4 a_O N n I � I Q i s O 2 I I (1j I I C11 � o Icy 14n o� v Iq Iry vo ❑ o to Irvp Np [z N __-•i----��--- ❑ v — m .- F 4 0 O M N N F- U E E a to Iv e D 0 m 0 !may I o Ici Ia 0 2 I j N cV T nt ❑ ❑ D U ❑ a U m t6 7i y M D P I I I U N d is i4 0 j a I I N I v f v i Cb oo ❑ �y'WpNrl 2 O Ibo Ivo cO n l r C ---'� ---'�'---- r I+7 p I❑ la p FQ IM � Crjc m rn�i li IL o to rG o O O P a_ M o 7 -..-I---•�--_ p m d j 4 j N n C] ❑ �F a o fo IrrV N G �P �0 0 r4 a Io Nb rry4 I� Imp r•�� Q w v cad o r o I cPv n d iia a7 t , x CV ii 4 I P r d d � p0 N y �p BOO o iP lop off' v v � I 1 ry ni � ❑ o jv �T m v aNI to l0 0 LU w Q N ❑ o jo jry M P o o 0 I U •CS ❑ �I D pI v J ry n, o I v r m co o I p t o L aL.. LL D > CL a I L w !LJ GS y: oI P = � x m ca V) Uco-fl 0 vi !@ O N Q i11 c1 m L a RT Page 602 0 0 Page 603 U 4 v c •m m 4 ifi m '� Ld �D m CL �c U A m N ry If7 i f I O 2 i Q l N I ..__i `p --j---- -j----o C3 U cn o !� Frio U 1 a m In 7. l o ate+ ❑ Cl --r'--- A I A F N N d -� ir1 IA U o t o l u7 it U p 1 o rC a 1 a � 6i m iQ N 4 F a 16!m to fm o0 la IN N O iIn U A to lin �n U Iv m v ino o la jCi m o Q cp v 1N� GV ii] a I i m m I N m .. _ ... _. L _ _ _ _ CV C CV p L] N 0 0 Uno Ctf 0 0 C 4 O I I 1 CP Lei 4i Lrj O 1 l a p (- f a) nl d I A I p C7 ei7 m Dry c jo j0mN� c Iw m Ioa Ga i� c I� ^ O wIa A wa CD m �� o l 0 1 4 p A 1 4 1 0 '_• N 1 lb C LCL 1 0 CL a. LL [� ri d [d f ____i i j0j0300 m o— m m Qo E o o N I ry N Gf in-� 0 16 a 0 CL I 1 l -"--r --..I ---- _..-�--- a ^� ha iN N w� i¢ ice$ L b I I l - � ?a o jo jn n aA a � i r•� 10 1w �aoa O i Q i d c ! u`y N y LL wi m X N G io Iarl 4r1 ry l^ ^ ! p C] I^A �o l to o C1i o to - Ln C O I -r----r--' I Im n lA (C) Ao j a j^ O I ILrf RG �D W O A I p I If7 n ! O A O coLn Cd •� O to ja o D Q lr� U IC 1C .. 1 -1 --" iN N 1 i -r- 04 H O o ! a l C7 i N elf c N f. C m 4 p I O I rV fo N e Q o 1 0 [) o .L-� N ¢ cm uim a 3 0 o LLI 6 [d ~ U Z 0 'o Page 603 0 0 Q N O N yL+ N C O U tm :a m Page 604 o ;a a O C C C J o • o � � CL I I C) I i NCD I t 111 � o f d 1 Ei al Cll ao Id Idea �a a a = I N a t o I N od to I� u] v O !o Iv? to C O u O Eo jry N E aoI a 1 .n vi a I E d vi ai c Q � U D o D l I o to Ian of U o l a l y7 c in o o N g a to Io c j b 1 1 � I j y iri p o d m N K a d d Q p O p a D W la Ir r tlS 4b tf7 I d l u'1 IA m �+� o Io l0 0 f� C iia o i c o v CL W N a m j 4 j m m U 56 a ao Ip fep 0 c '--t'-..1 __' la fpra arE N Zi a 0 O LW o I R I I rn� Ido t cp Ip U Iia Ir ---- I 1 . la Ide7 d[� Qfl C? I 1 r__.. _r - r I I _ N " E I Lr VJ ---r----r - - -•- I t LU jo jro n 1,6 4 C Io Ic o CD L] �,y Ido I m a f0 O _ to 0 0 CM CEIo 7 C r ! o c V LU m a LU ■!@�i ep f a Y cz Q N O N yL+ N C O U tm :a m Page 604 0 0 Page 605 Q U w ar] w ri (j L7 N N � 1 1 ❑ CD [y I t N---- 1 Nz o j e I car to s N nNi � � E _ O � o I�ryi Im cryo Q � m m O ;c j.0 m ~ I P 1 w0 ---r----r - - -- ^ - (V Lq md% EC N R Q 1 t� I m m mM _... M G 0 o z Q j jw ry o p o �~ n �T 0 il] I ! m ! -c+l --------------- CO N _ fl N U m im a 4 [� ❑ F � I � i Q1 ti N N M Q ! o •- N �� o a O I C] ! Ci I O p N � Yyy 1 I 00 N C t O I Q ]b7a o !ua o is iC Q o 4Q ❑ ---� [zr C ----�--- - a) m u7 ani a I d ] rn ['i Q IN la ti W u� Cil o IC fr iv n� [� C LL a' c u EL m ----j ----'•-_ --•- N a_ o 1 .- I kp m I C7 4 a •• Vl � O i N I m � u�i .0 ma. xa [1J IQ !om o kR L LkJ a ru 7� o In irn 'o ma 03M 6. U LL LL ❑ a l d I d [h 1 c� I rn N a Q N 'V ! 0 KD Ina Ia I ry ! .p 0 0 I O a Io CD N Cy p "l p U o C:3 I v t rip n �+�_nn+ w '--r---'r---- - ---- *' 0 Q iv IN ❑ a � - O D 0 oQ i m 1- Tn = 0 O i (j V o o o o N ry ry o IM0 wCCi m Yo o ro n 0 cz m `� T �7 . ~ m - H In C CI U i:i U O C9 m; Page 605 8 C E 7 cn 7+ cl C ❑ U N f� U L m Go D N G LO _ d CS7 m tV C LL. [d Cl) U QJ 43 ❑ ❑ 7ro 7 9 Q7 x N C*7 C>J 4 C1! w w_ C ❑ .N tlJ 7 a v LU w m U 2 L) O � � O a� Q C14 a� Q • 4 C N O 2 i O ❑ U � a •� m o m � U M 21 F -IL c ' o ' uW7 ep7 gra yea I I I I I I I I -r _ _ _ _ r _ - _ I 1 a to !o a G Im 1 � 0 4 11 1con I m n To o Io Im I vw O 4 fw ILD n _-_ ___L.__ I I 1 C] I N 0 1u7 o Itl l� ry o to l0 0 I I, o to loom a o uo Io fa'o 0 I I ri I I o fv Irn r� ! I I� Im M _[O N � Ir Io m I 1 a I^ lQ cy u� I o I N o a a o ici 1p d I I � IM Iu'+ m o f� Im m a o 6 o I 1 I I o INo 1^0 ov 1 I o t o I f sr I n M 'D o la ]m r 1 I G : IN IG &) I c I m to m c la) !N $ Ip IN m M M o �o I I 2 7 � cq Q N C 0 Q w N ❑ U tm m LO i"] rIL_ Page 606 0 Page 607 D d u G M tZ rw w �+ In In ❑ i 1 I C\l i 0 }+ I I t• � � j � � � m N lxj o I� la o v Z � m O 1 0 l O O U cg IO ❑ o Iuvi In m= oo ] I o O zcf, Lr? Orn D m F F q 47 I� I m a C3 Q NLn G! ! I m r C d 1,�7 o In to d m C :3G m d -W 'If] O� 4 �� y�y Im CI) ] m C D ' O ❑ O d O U cc m o v Nwr*���w�----. U O l O ] n 0 r N N g ry o to ID o 47 ry 0 0. P o V! N C N � O O N ' O Cly a lyp Imo rpav N Ln rV o v N k 0. o Ila I m u -I 2 x m rn co 0 ❑ co -wm Iia v ❑7 a z c j�cy I�tq 0�,-, Nd c7 4P VI ❑ loo lip o0 od 7� m m op m ❑ x4 w � Imp fnl$ lri I� m .c o 0 v --�---'i---' ILa a - m u^�to I I � w L I�c� ISM N N N lad - 1 16 I CD t� o O rr N d 7 i� iN m N rn CM Q ++ r-� i� m O Nll� Q CV in :V - o j N N vFi, ❑ 1 I t I _ 1p ip LU G W. LLI _ C .7 I I o c C N cY w Q: hi © c i Q 2 1• F y r - I i i:. ❑ H i I� 1� u o L = ° IL j U o �O v+ m C LU 'ao m -_ .7 r W G ~ C 7 l!'1 C - U O M � Page 607 r�L L J Page 608 �vo ;m =' 'G M1 Q ❑ X1^1 a ��' h1 ❑ ma ;o Wo IL v :co la m Lp C) 1 I z 1 N C7 j j -r--^-r--- f I CV U o la la o I .z m i w f a c7 1 1o v V N Irl a c ❑ 0 a o IL Ir e m d 1� [m ov+ 0 u7,0 � 0 4 [IR17 I V ma v c7 0 Ip v ro F [p'] �o m �m eco E 0 o iN i o O ry---r---- v I Io o ir7 u] a v C] 1LO 'n 1 N i N Z i� '� M v �[+7 W C 0 ❑ ❑ m 4 117 N R N1P N { V d I C I n N kq 1^p'7 i a t'1 L o la la o t11 jo 4 v Co 0 r:5 4o IqP I18 Gv � IP N [rnP Imp I1ry7.P `b 0 P IM Irl n LiOW a] I 65 L 7 C Ip G iv :r ry [ f � [ti I 1 P KO o iIn f m a a m la omo o Ic c OJ 04 L P c�il� ovp w1p ij� ?o iR mm a lu7 D a� I Ll iia a o t 0 d j+E It i I x v Im Im ao IQe� lora n ! � 1 v to loa imo G ao [V � _ ! m C'V � INa IRP iIp il0 ❑ o I C o � v -r- C3 (y p a j n j ry rn I o CV Q U o I R I ro t 70 N all i i 04 rte+ r`9y 2r I Ni = - W P I� In O 0 Q: 2 c 1 iy f �° a `r 0 cam`7 o 1N [7 N m I W U C w v I o Y-+ E2 i ❑ jLO Im u�i T N v jm o � � � N c -❑LU U ' b c m m :C Ef N . G ❑ T .7 ~ iL r -a rj ❑coi Page 608 0 m 0 ^ r N 000 �o mo w a m I I 1 1 C I o .fl ! 1ry N 1 N vNi I n � 1 � � iC I � o � O 6 r3 0 o rrr*rrr i v la a M l o th N to N I uy-i I o ,n -r---- I r I I ! oto m I ^ o r �n I ❑ N c �0 0 I rw ! G co W 07) Q i b O I r I I I I I rn _ I m 4 ! O I � � M r � I N I---- m I rn ro I o ; d -- - in r- - - - I a I� a Io I a M rn 0 a Page 609 o o •w m o •o I ! 1 I N I I -r- - � CV o b o O aj a R I 1 m �D 4 ❑ o f 4 I cP in ,.- m 6 b p F 1 I N N o in im w n � U 0 m Nrrr*rrrr*r«-.� ❑ r in w U ev 4 io io0 c ,o ,o 0 i4 to a G?co G f C Jnr t� !o Iu q o a la Iccvn No xR W ❑ I Ic-i� old C ❑ i j '--r----r---- ^ I c•� ["� tU m -�-'. N 1 6 I m 4i O �4 10 C ,Da o ,o ,G a CL m -r-- �M 4 jo io Lo 0 Q7 d F d I d ! N N 9 �o �Ci C a --- .r ---- r_-__ (D fn�� w4 b IQ I C 4 O I a I Qp OC Ia Iia e� O u+� t I ry Va o jo iry o ID ,4 0 OJ I ! x o O to tv v d 1 I n ro N N ,o ,oma a4 po �4 1npNi� n� O y: ❑ o fq jm m LL 0 a o I o lm o0 o !o �0 0 V I I ----� ----f ---- [n C'V fn 0 t 4 I a o :a 6 j N 10 0 > ° c ; o • `m lJJ �+ x m U O ° s : � to m 0 ^ r N 000 �o mo w a m I I 1 1 C I o .fl ! 1ry N 1 N vNi I n � 1 � � iC I � o � O 6 r3 0 o rrr*rrr i v la a M l o th N to N I uy-i I o ,n -r---- I r I I ! oto m I ^ o r �n I ❑ N c �0 0 I rw ! G co W 07) Q i b O I r I I I I I rn _ I m 4 ! O I � � M r � I N I---- m I rn ro I o ; d -- - in r- - - - I a I� a Io I a M rn 0 a Page 609 0 11 U O F hl La o_ A ❑ a o i n a G w co CL to N N p ri ❑ I 1 �A It o z e N N i 0 IF N i �! N � C z o i p I n d c Q a� C C 4.7 p O z ❑ ❑ — g U 2 o Id I� io °O m to o I n E � � O F fU N "--r--'-r---^ E ❑ ❑ I 1 - m to fm m E ° o IC, f� G 7 p tQ jro V {1] 2 I ,I tv cv C ❑ U U in ❑ � o I � !m �D o Ip eQ o C j d I I Nv7 Q !4 I N d N D �cti Q fo IC, cn a to Imo No "D IL U.1 I..__ C---- ~ a)�N c iv l� LL CD a N ❑ a a �o �0 0 D N CO a l0 1�o Ora 0 x Q i 4 I v c ..0CP lIJ R I j I r I N tNi, Ic 0 � f I � I I io O p o l0� 0 o to Im ❑ + Y Ol 1 I to Im m m ° ;o �o v_ -- ❑ N r O VI ` ❑ 4o In 1w in o tQ o c7 j C-4 U) �U Ci [ _ IW 7 dl p° a° • a) ro bl v z to I 'i � 11 U O F Page 610 hl La o_ A a G to Nzi fu p ri m � a �A It ❑ N 0 N N i �! � C a� C C p O z g U 2 � � O V P� Page 610 ME E E U} a c a U Z; ❑ U L_ 7 ❑ c0 ❑ [V C a O C N CD ❑ m m [o C a_ [u u] U �3 D d W V7 7 O L 4.T u m x N N 7 LU w is U C N Q 2 w w ro U ►l 0 2 0 Page 611 0 W 0 Page 612 U c ro �m M IL _..h----h•-- I ] Lp I I C t I N 1 I N2 U o f o I o v o �•• f p o Iq Im 7i f I 0 1 4 I nmi n 0 0 �o �i7 cn E is imm E o to im m U � a d ra 0 o I I I o G P C I100 I I 7 a q O O N C N x� r I a a jd oma �o � to •ark a I v l 0 0 iii- jo jc v ir �� o jo j�eo7 to --^-i ----i ..-- d d I I v a D - 0 Im W J I ? _CD� I O jG j7 It d o to I� r j O U li q X Q o O O j C 4 N o Iv !cy n� cr] I I __-i ' C7 T IE:. jm CV O N o io 0 io I 1 wLLJ x o jv jn IA. G ----_••-� ---- C U � O C7 c l a I10 4 C j aLU O , m m A O i 7 U _� W 0 Page 612 0 O O E 0 ro E m L!7 O. N RT 11 a d O ' ❑ CL � a L11 � E O a N V a I [ e O z 1 1 N 1 U ao : p 4 0 Rl 0 S L) -- - -- R V 4 O:a p V O U' a , Q • a p --I V p l 1 0 , 0 o a to to ,o O C, — n I 1 = 1 I R'+ [0 D N71 iN � 171 F- N 1 ni m a) N Do Q 1 n rn� ism U 0P a l a 1 a 2 2 co ao ci ' ai i N I nj � 1 � e I I I I I U o la Bo •a � U C9 1Cp 1[p .iO � s t6 U 1 [ E CD o 0 . r CL x N m •a ' ¢� 1 •L] t Q G 1 Cl 7 !l U - ...} _. rr❑^ VJ N Af W 1.00 co C rd v ra N xa LLI o IQ (V i L ( �a LL 117 ' O CL C co -- 1 --}..._ II LD v 1 � fL F N 1 CV to O I d I�xLa O IQ N 1 ctio LINO a AA U lz [V [ N � 1 1 V� x N 1 W 1 o G7 r o N v Ip Ci LO ....} - - O O ' � o io v ' w w o �� 1 0] v I o v w n wca o c�'i m oa • •� j U O O E 0 ro E m L!7 O. N RT 11 Page 613 a d O ' CL � a E O a N V rO7 , G7 U ao : p 4 0 0 S L) -- - -- R V 4 O:a p O U' a , Q • a p --I V p l 1 0 , 0 o a to to ,o Q Id 10 .Qj I I Ln , Ln I 1 = 1 I Z m a) Do Q 1 1 U I1 U 0P a l a 1 a 2 co ao ci ' ai i � 1 � e I I I I I U o la Bo •a C9 1Cp 1[p .iO � s t6 1 [ E CD o . r CL x F m •a ' ¢� . : : N LLm Q U - Page 613 Page 614 C c 0 C;,L7 C7 0 O d I O Ca C 7 p ' CD O "' _ 0_ CO W` _ C a CD D ,� q CO p I O f 0CD I p o 10 io �o 0 1 Q (` rn i� 1 m Irn CY1 1 n tr �- N I u.) I � i to 4 I Cl I O ! 0 4i U a Io to Ip Ln Lr) LO Ln b I wI to I�O I w U'7 INI� t�L2 N Cf1 o i4 ]p fo o -+r 4 -4 tr r_ I I I U') I L 111'7 F [t7 7. O o f4 I6 C o 1 4 16 16 U CCF Q rr1 rni r�'i i Cri T o io io io D Q 'iO ' 7 N ACV IN FCV L? o t o so I o p o DC7 io �o CV C\j C 0] (] I 'p 'Z L ] 411 M = C) Ip :o Io C7 n1n i17 I IA , to , tf] Q cl> ❑7 C) co I I J cq I I n 1n I M i 6 I p I p LLY�� yc�l C 1 0 1,0 I1 F � � F-- o n CI pp I tp U � ,- 1,2I 1 -4- �_� CO o, p 1 O I D I I 1� Cry' J I t p! a I O I p d i o CD O o p 0 Ip C] C-) A I� L J 41y t!7 N 4n W a xLU a I p ca U NO m CC ' z U ❑ 7 j VJ = G CL 'm _0 jy b Ir f C IL 'O id W LLI Z 1 m �? tb 2 Ib Q) 1 �a Ido Page 614 a 0 1 Q X 1 n tr U o to b I N o jo n tr o +o hq U O co 1 m o la CCF 1 o 4 � y rn I G] U m n1n O 4 o NNo � n 1n I o to LLY�� yc�l C 1 0 � � f I I 14.. 1 1 b y d i o 0 Ip Np A I� L d 1 0 a xLU a I p j IL f d i � O 1 �a Ido u] Imo Imo T 0 1 4 o lo CD -1 W Vl o I d Q7 2 n f n z 3 b to 1 4) w. N Cf N N ia1 D i G ❑ T C o �� . L w m a f w d LU 0 r z ;z7 Page 614 65 E E tr ❑ U N m 0 U L_ ❑ ❑ co 0 N ❑ O � d r0 N C 0 N m Cii ❑ n.. m w U O IZ lit N N 7� } U �7 tl] X N cli6 0 N 0 mi W ui a U 0 L Q] CC❑ 11C W W w U 0 U T 0 Vt Vt !p Ile? I by m o to ro low o 1 Im p to ,m oI) p 1 1 m G C,I c eWj I o r I o o to �o Zo mo o Zo Im I� ----------- I Im I a ao la 'n I� m c o r4 la p l0 1 I� c 4 1 0 1 N r a 6 F1 m I r Z rn I wl 1 0 1 0 I C 1 uP9 0 p a la ,rn 'w a to io Nail n N 1 I I 1 I I 1 i 1 I 1 I o io irn �ti � 1 I IC3 2 n o ro to lup-+q p ! r I I 1 I I ! 1 I f s I I 1 I I Z qI G 1 O o I g 4 n G I C I v o o Zo Ir?p Ir. o ,rno 1 I o ro ro IN n to 10 I C ! Q I N I W v Ig n v �ci �c fa c Ian n O r o o I N P go P I P r Q I O d I i IM �r`• 1 1 fr• � ry _ rn o n ❑ � � J 1 N N C G1 0 <C @ p jr ❑CL V ' d 3 ; Q 1 Page 615 xg Ill a. RI La o m � O ron ra ul � a LL U Q V .• _V L Z C m hf C7 y a F w Q] 7 LLJ C CV til 51 0 Vt Vt !p Ile? I by m o to ro low o 1 Im p to ,m oI) p 1 1 m G C,I c eWj I o r I o o to �o Zo mo o Zo Im I� ----------- I Im I a ao la 'n I� m c o r4 la p l0 1 I� c 4 1 0 1 N r a 6 F1 m I r Z rn I wl 1 0 1 0 I C 1 uP9 0 p a la ,rn 'w a to io Nail n N 1 I I 1 I I 1 i 1 I 1 I o io irn �ti � 1 I IC3 2 n o ro to lup-+q p ! r I I 1 I I ! 1 I f s I I 1 I I Z qI G 1 O o I g 4 n G I C I v o o Zo Ir?p Ir. o ,rno 1 I o ro ro IN n to 10 I C ! Q I N I W v Ig n v �ci �c fa c Ian n O r o o I N P go P I P r Q I O d I i IM �r`• 1 1 fr• � ry _ rn o n ❑ � � J 1 N N C G1 0 <C @ p jr ❑CL V ' d 3 ; Q 1 Page 615 Page 616 _ . - n o...i o_ �••__tm a IQ t� low In 'o � o I$ to ipp 1,6 o d a i IW o la I� �aa 10 l o w o CD m _ �tl O rC Ip 14 0 47 F I i iw IM m ❑ U o r p I� � ry v to td l0 0 0 0 o Ip o to 154 2 C �� -- E p o VJ m T�..-.i... ... i ... O N R ----F•___�---- ❑ wu7 o Ep i� j N 7E r� o to o u'7p i� is lnr� o c v ----�---F----+---- U)co n I 0 r ❑ C ' I _....�.----F-�--+----- N 4J par I I jo '� tae,.t r: 4� o �o iou4io e I 0 ❑. Co cn I 11 L ----j -__------- ^-•�_ L� a q I p 1 0 I to -m'a IY p v O s I i Cu a r a) '01 I f I ❑ C+� I e i ! s7 � tO7 � ps la tLLo I� v cm rn `i op to ,� 11n to In rn _0 M a 6 it'❑ ra n P f4 w f p to o fo io Icpila L! Id oin .2 C � 113 N m In N m ! QI -► _ LLI i 41 Cd CO C6 iS] W is UJ �� f = �' m �.� Y L] 0 N O a 'a ¢ a � m C u7 ¢ 3 CD cD Page 616 E 0 ❑ d o •v a �[ ] Q , � , CD I I , N, I I I I N----h--.. m !m U 0 4 Q N 0 I p V j j�o go a---� ----r --- N d fl O 1 6 I N 1 [ F O iG C a`) Q [d Id d -- -h C U I N N C O o 0 , i 1 o ! f o c ❑ o U U u7 cv �b Ind '� d lad L ro ------------ o I j 4 p o 00 ❑o ,00 N � La uia o d❑ dad iv i$o �a q Io !� a 1 I r N a� , N jo rl � a ' U) W6' o Iq 1Oa v � los + 0] aH �,o ioo Q � LL aZ ❑ ,n o I nr 0 r I CS� �d jq� O� a d I q , U LL , (D tLA L11 o io tom od ' ][ 04 0 err, 0 q o , �o m o n 1 ! F r I I r a - ❑ ' m Im N EL U o ,o _0 'a UA LU I 1 m I !0 0 U I I0 o ❑ , ---------:---- C im m 1 ! m w 1 1i 0 0 G a W 2 16 LU o, , rn � 1 roq Ca 0 a7 [ Ica W "' 0 Page 617 ❑ d o •v a ❑ I I N � I I I I V j j�o go a---� ----r --- N d fl O 1 6 I N 1 [ C Q [d Id d � 0 j q � 0 4 ❑ U i 1 o ! f o c n ro ------------ o I j 4 p o ! I [3 N 2 iv i$o �a q Io !� a 1 I r jo yv mm o jm m c to lo,n a+n a d C W6' o Iq 1Oa v LL aZ I I r I CS� �d jq� O� a d I q tLA o io tom od T m o n 1 ! F r I I a - I EL I 1 I !0 0 I I0 0 ---------:---- C im m 1 ! m w 1 1i 0 0 I I 0 � 1 roq Ca 0 a7 [ Ica W "' ----1--'-�---- m ! I L) U. n 10, Id Ivo CY N r�7 Cl Iry N Im i+s R I C Q n r n$ a N CV U SO Page 617 0 0 06 Q M m ❑ `o m EL -0 cc J O N E Z CL r-- 6�T ,a CLI ❑. .5 Cr W i 0 En q a r Page 618 L7 4 d o n p o •� o � I I � I I � I I cn --^•�'---i--' N U I l o o 0 0 ! I� f Ir r C) U o IQ Iv a � o IP l0 0 4 16 16 p - r- - _' E Q I 11 C&n E 6=3 t o 0 I m 10 0 I I � U O a U m ~ y N C� � ❑ p ! p 16 d OivN v,� 4 v 10 to 0 p 14 roPo 00 cm tl a Ip In n ----F--F---- a l4 IQ o �N CSV C K. C1 o Iv Iov o� 0. 15 -2d IQ fn r ____i [ y m 52 t I 11In a I ca CL C m v I$ I m U p v l G I G p C G Id Ip � ah- Q a o _^•�----�---- Io Ivan N i C, o i v I p o o v va Lu L _ .. I -F- � I I b I U m LL I l I ____i x Q I l 0 0 ['S r____�..-_ [D I i O Q U I I v n ❑ r W 1 16 v uj 0 Z I lo' ov cz 0) I I m m N = I� _'__..�,.___ C R N 0 v Q o N W ry I I ml W0 � E0 ' m m _w +U CSS an c F U N a" ; 0 06 Q M m ❑ `o m EL -0 cc J O N E Z CL r-- 6�T ,a CLI ❑. .5 Cr W i 0 En q a r Page 618 Page 619 � E LO / / / ƒ & \ } L ; _ % E ] LLL E / c / Q k ¥ � j � � Q j ) @ 5 \ / 2co § § \ E � � cu � 7 k \ = @ : m § / - ƒ � & 7 / ) 2 I a � k 0 ^ E & 2 k § 2 / \ ƒ § L & \ R _ k \ 2 W 7 \ -� / \ J LU E 2 2 \ ) � LU / m / > � � Page 619 0 0 Page 620 \ / � #- 4 i / § } � 2 o q @ ; � �8 i/ ) C\j / L | --�--�-i-- { � % § C _ |m �o ) - » ?- / J ; § k ! o k§ ' k k ƒ 4! �# k M U ! g ,9 .o $© o 2 2 ■ Q 5 z :« .� ,\ 0 gƒ D = � \ G ;a ;a !m LL -6 E r =_I . o CL E o , � U) § k a) 6 y 2 / J S " 'r 2 -/ k X CL/ �� k \ £■ k k \ \Z Cl? a th § \ . . . . k / w \ 0 ® \ o k 2 cc a mo ,k 'I -D m E '- g o = 3 ¥ 2 ■ 'k '\ �\ \ o / o o / k -0 [ '( }j ) » [ £ LU% :{ b § .§ ; y § § 0 $ / % J2 / \k /\ C o c _ E > Page 620 I v C) N O N 1 CV W 5 n Q7 c C 7 U N Ctf U 7 ❑ C co O N C CV C m m C d N V D7 a a_ N N 7 0 N [a N ❑ x C%! C•7 CD C� CV 0 LU [11 U C a N 0] ❑ IU LU m U 0 m L ,LO C\i OD co 00 cc 03 ,N ,N ,RI .CV a E E m cn N r_ O N E LU O CV is Page 621 I I I f I I I k I I I I I l I I I I I 1 I f i I F I I I I ! f I I I I m I q io I i I I I I I E I I I �- ❑ Io n l r IWi� I I �n coI I cA ICO I cc I W I m coI Ito I I I I I I I f I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I t I I I I I I I I I I I ! tr W iL LLL E W N m Z ,% ' ro D E CT crC ? •to .w ,tt7 ,U) 4 J , J m W a nW o " o ya N a c ,-u � W, CU , W • 67 . N , G1 � > . • �l , > , a a E E m cn N r_ O N E LU O CV is Page 621 N 6 N -6 C0 C uJ LU U E tl� v a 2 w w ro U 0 Page 622 ❑ cow 'ccm uico w a m k Vi cn U n Ir! $ o p o a 19 o �o o S o I ton r I ao r m I r+ vi a o Fw o la U o ry 'n I � rs m In m U o c m rm n vO I unj• n "1 Immo) 0) V v o In m r vi r7 G 75 o Z N---------- Q •a a R F a I N a tv [v 2 IL cti 1 ^. ni I cv N p a � I co N NF W o HLq m 4 .cC* I Qai O N o N N KS4 O iL4 LU f � lt7 3N 0 a m {y '-' CV .3 q M CL 2 m LL Q1 EG I LL _...r__' o — I cryo I n m Lo CL r Im xa LU N o rti �v� m a o a �. roLU i - -r---- mn I O >b I m m� I? d o I C1 G l4 N o Incc M ❑ o to o fl o to O ❑U ca n m io n N � � ry ❑ ❑ c a 1 I cq V ❑ 4 U � Irn m o C I C G] O 14 a o E U2a N N a� Page 622 F' 1 LJ 0 0 2 S U 4 � gra 4 a L wa w n j 4 ❑ U p ' ' N n M try .n d O v a m M ru Ni O C] 0 � 14 C o c I I 11 w 0 2 [o I p O m i'v a' � T 14 Ip C r____�.____ 147 Q O I m f ,m ,ru c7 ry ----r -�-'r---- ❑ I C U � I� Ivmi m v o I Imm vol 2 0 fm o U o N Ma yy ❑ U o F I I o N i n I m v �? N cl IN ILO co j � n 14 I d C7 ❑ 4 r I b ❑ �'n roN � r F c� lune I� n co CV Lu ap I� fo 0 r w n I ❑ cn Nam I I Oi C Iia j CL 16 0 N----i"--'�'--- f U pin aN i� Inp m 4 oo ipCL Q G7 N EV Iv ❑ n0. 0� 1� v 03 111 a p C n ❑ lU La LL � � N [V x I I rc-) o o v I i I i CD ❑ I w Iv ,N n N U q I 1 N cq M o io to 4i ❑ --1--- LLI Lj p r ov i0 i� m n iC 16 Q N M G D -i- ❑ R A L7 I v7 I m m OJ a [r o1 v r v m f N O O i^ LLI C7 o LL! 7a o "J m :� U_, v Q w :M 0 0 2 S U 0 o •o .r u7 'm gni ri to f o IC, o aj vo 14 f� r m , !! N 1 m 1 'D co o j� jairn cp o Fo Iw � �rn �N ro ---`r ----r---- N Gp Iv I c F IGirn a r1 v F o I IS IS i2b ��-- f I 0„7 In In a pp IN Irnu7 ,+n m Ip IQ c 1 I m oLni n o c O n Iv jv v Lrp I f I 1^ ^ Ln I Gl F I n pN Fn I� a p G I 01 Fr Lo In !c) m O Ln n ov �ci Ic ,v o F I I!N N 1 I 'p � N lY f I o Im 1� c o o o p I� ip O Iw im rr m , , M M IN m I O n cc in I v j in et D m 1 7 m N .• I :r•:i: s. m T d v :p m o a .w Page 623 4 � gra 4 a L wa w n j 4 O O C] 0 z 14 C c c� 0 O m 0 o •o .r u7 'm gni ri to f o IC, o aj vo 14 f� r m , !! N 1 m 1 'D co o j� jairn cp o Fo Iw � �rn �N ro ---`r ----r---- N Gp Iv I c F IGirn a r1 v F o I IS IS i2b ��-- f I 0„7 In In a pp IN Irnu7 ,+n m Ip IQ c 1 I m oLni n o c O n Iv jv v Lrp I f I 1^ ^ Ln I Gl F I n pN Fn I� a p G I 01 Fr Lo In !c) m O Ln n ov �ci Ic ,v o F I I!N N 1 I 'p � N lY f I o Im 1� c o o o p I� ip O Iw im rr m , , M M IN m I O n cc in I v j in et D m 1 7 m N .• I :r•:i: s. m T d v :p m o a .w Page 623 0 c 0 v Page 624 m o do U CD a 2 0 Lp O n D U ❑ • � a C I- N to o a o m z p y D IIn jw �jp joo Icp 7. 0 o a. cV f. I I M CIA `r u' In t In a i j ILO ❑ �� I I 1 I � I 1 I I -C p Z03 mN o ---r---r---r---r--- .� K a v I I I 1 n LU I I I I ! OD N ❑ I ! F I 1 _ G O !N IN �r �r IN_ I� Int IN ❑Cb LU N-.. IO F4 tl7 Lia -d IT IN 1� I� l(3 CV m C] IC7 1m IN IM =P] 16 0 I I Q ) p I I I 1 I N R I O ICV I I O 0 O ❑Q o V] O N N IN L� I. IN IQ IN r � LD 117 N to I Q7 1[a Ill N Ic`7 IC] !C] IN Irl in 1 1 1 1 1 ❑ 7 C q 1 1 I 1 1 I p 0 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 F f 1 1 I LLa tl] Q 1 I 1 1 1 I 1❑ 1 I {}I �"• I 1 1 1� 1 1 p QI [7 w 1 1 I U 1 I C l l a f 1 L (7 0 o m W � -Cl 1 1 1 IIU 1/i O 1 1 I IA 1 i7 CV -Oi.S zm 'o, 1 i ❑ qv 197 Ir V C N i m I [tl 1— 1 7 122 CD CV � u q r� z c w w cu .2 Oy } C o n U z LLJ _ i.) Ca � y a C7 C O pp 3 L"7 LJI a� !N 'cn 'V 'In 'CD c 0 v Page 624 Page 625 r• I00 IQ : C IM •� ' v '� • C^•] NN I•n f_ LLT �M LO �� ; CCS cco ' 11 'O V p p C) p D 1 0 0 1 0 p 0 I A I p i O � a O1p IJ. 45 r, to .I [1D Lm:117 IN EC7 V) L70 ❑] In iN Sm I I CO im im =[ri _� ;� im I I iF-- �� it 3 � r l •-• i i I i l l j l i i l l � i i � L L I I t f ! I ! I II I ! f 'p 10 I [] 'O 1 C, ' CI 'p I p IO Ip 'O 'O 10 �O 16 IO O' O ' p I p I p I p p+ O ' O ' 0 I C♦ p I p I p I p I p I O I p Cc?I� ' '� 10:1 ' m ' W ' m I^ '77 [- 106 '[fl 170'ri 1CO Iw coI 0 C I00 I I I Y 1 e (] W 1 C w ' I I I 1 I ❑ � I I I I [ r,-r�.-,J—T"N" �-'r�•'-r-^-'r�"'wT-- �—^r"'--r�--�►'�`--r� 'r»» _ _ �__r---..�."T_-,T•«_-E I I I I 1 1 [ I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 I I 7 I 1 I I I I 1 I I I i I 1 I 1 1 � I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 r 1 1 I J J I I ICL i I 1 I I I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 I 1 N 1 I F I 1 7 1 I f 1 1 1 } I I I I f I I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 ! 1 1 I I 1 (] Q I I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I r I 1 1 ! 1 I I I I I I 1 1 I 1 ! 1 J I I I 1 f 1 J 1 I r I J 1 1 I I O I I I I ! I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 f CL 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I J I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 Q7__1--i---1--1--t---L-_1__--__1__1__.i--1 1 ! L-----1-1 -----1--�--- y 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 I ' 1 ; 1 ; 1 ; I I t CL 1 TC ~ 1 1 ! N 1 I I t I� I 1 1 1 Q} 1 1 I 1❑ I I N I IA U 1 C71 1 I 1 1❑ 1 1 1 f❑ 1 1 t 1❑ I 1❑ 1 1 1 1❑ 3 1 1 1 , CL Ui 1 1 w N 1 2 1 I w 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 I C V Q 1 1 I i I k t ry I m 1 1 N m x LUI I I O [ Q I i 1 1❑ r N 1 1 1 f 1 f r N � 1 1 j ' I [] I O 1 7] 1 ; I [] l y 1 I I N I ri1 I I� ; f E I 1 0] �❑ -❑ ' t 1 l a 1 N 1 F a i ; 1 I 1 ! 1 1 4 1 t o 1 y ^ I '❑ ' I 1 _� 1 0 ! e I N i❑ n 5 1 I Q 1 Q7 1❑ ' (- t j-- ' 1❑ i 1 ]- 1� i 1 I q t J 1 Iif I 1 Q (D V w 1 ' 1 I N I I Imo] 1 f N I 1 f I N i .-+ I 1 w I 1 1 C ❑O V ? i s ; U 10 1 D I C I OU ! I 1 t" '!S i(J L1I ''y I C E 7 I I ' I 1 I 1 1 I'1 1 f d 1 1 I Q I 1 I U. 4, L:I. :�. k ::. ::J. 1p .1 p�� I 4 �CL .l ;[-,� ;�? .. ..� .311 �F 1p M ; U o N 2 H o ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ a 3 L u2 2 p L a ❑ ❑ ❑ • 1 G + C ' LU W f` L C C CO ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ttl O O O O. C U U 'a L) U 171 Cd O kc p ' [L a I C C + C C C U EE F • r i I a I I a C L C C_ ' C 0 'o 'C) •cn ''n •c*s m ,a I¢ Page 625 0 C D V L3 N r_ O U SD 7 CD CIO N LYS d N O C m O �1 E r N M m 0 N N m mo CL 5 1 � P1 -52 n ;© .o .a .n F- ' CD r- x a CD m > x x m x •xN x vi CD 0; no C7 x 1 x_ x_ 1 x_ t x_ j x eu v6' a� F '0 '❑ '0 ri 0] m O n ❑ I0 O o o .titer' Qm ca n r V f t i I I I t t I 1 f 1 I = L3 1 I 1 I 1 I I I ! 0 t 1 I I i7 C I I C 1 f C I C ❑I � 0� ; S OI 10 1 10 7. to J -L-2- I J t J I J- J C �1 o is iaa r0 o {o a t a N N I I N 1 I N � N 1 l ti J Jas I I 1 I m ,n ❑ 0 t t a 1 u. a rn �rn irn gal Im � a cn It9 co' i' I� Icn IED {Ib o Go _o a ❑ [ a' mJ I i I I t i w o 6 i i I CID N m O 1 I { cC C M w� o ! o n In 14R! o o In In Ir• 0 n I� F` HZi, I ma. W [lj C O J t I 1 I I I ra o •'� N � n ro U_ n n N N CL o �o �o to to In - � N � 0 to Io to t❑ IO rf 0 r- E f I I CL �� e I t I { CD t6 .0 Q F o KMr;o C O : CS� 0 tC] 10 Io jq U ❑ , N I G z _ I p O 0 0 0 I Q X 31 I 1 1 1 IL1 1106 i vi ; Q7 i C 4 , LV i 1 i ry m E iN jT p (*] 2 I I I 1 I N [B j n j fs7 I m j °h I I I Q I I ! W W W 0 a U I I I I I U ![1 Q { I I I I QI I I I ! ............... ..f... N 7 ID _ C E 5 l4 m i4 = W vmi c ; M ; U 7 LU td o n U m o t ; 5 C7 'u7 '0 'm 'si C D V L3 N r_ O U SD 7 CD CIO N LYS d N O C m O �1 E r N M m 0 Page 626 m N r] P1 0 i a m m rj o 0 U n r eu v6' a� F M ri N ❑ O o o .titer' Qm ca n r 0 L3 0 to ru a in In m p, � N L N Lx 5- u - m ,n ni rn� u. a - n m o Go _o a x 4 w m O M w� 0 W tp n o ra o •'� N � n ro U_ n n N N o n x - � N � rf ~ U ❑ Page 626 C CL L!7 0 N O N N N 6 a N G4 0 N 4 LU LLJ CII U C N N LLL LLI C6 V 0 O� 0 Page 627 :o 0 Q p o • o � C • v`V] uN'i � I I 1 I � f ! I I o O I I . !a I I O O I c l p cn o -r- nt a — po I v7 to Ic 1 I n w m o o la l0 cp c 4 uN-� 12 o to IN N .L _' _' O G3 f3 I I o o I ! to ILn in N o a O o � o IC to 0 I r 'N N o 0 t o I a I D I p m po M a�e� a D I� loa aA �c 6 I t 14 Iv v tib c I o l 0 �o �0 6 0 I F om O to Im I I m �Fp oA foo I�p w I t I I cn c� xa A !� i�6 po o 0 IAl � l 1 ma �� — o 6 to In I I t G 16p rp LL a A l O 1 0 C I 1 N o O IA I4j a A 13 ! I m p�p I 1 I i O o I I !v I Q c to u� u] m In I o I !o In �n x 2 a r4 Lo to a o I I lA Im c, ir o [a l0 0 I ! O� 0 Page 627 0 0 N 0 N C O IC{ 19 CL L ^ W t� 0 n cl a d ❑ N P 'rvi aln C� p ri e+i O I I I N L � I I O I I I T [� f_ 0 2 o l a ! Gl m O to low oN 0 � j ui cD c Vi to a I oo o ca I pp m F ri ri KV a I - 0 jo O IQ ;m 0j 47 rD m m I IND o IQ !a o co Iw co 2 F c� o ]a �C11 H O II0-CIA C _ P IQ I p O r !� N C4 T u� m jG m a1 P I N I N I mnl o I� m U L I o ti N I din I n I n U m i ca �d 6 4 rn LL o j 4 SCS v to Q IU !C ❑ of oo Ie o III N NU7 N P is I d p� Q r d I n 00 N w0. L[ d P C 0 io Ioo do v [J N �49 - - - ❑ t o �N m I kr) .n IQ Iv a p� C� a I G cow LL a n t o t o a o C o C pJ to r N � I m pap 14 O I i �c v o b n 4I D 1 c W po IM R IQ CJ I � I� Mi I N CL I -- I I CR17 �� Rj I I m d jo [per 4r� O v a O o 0 I� a X b P p O o -C u fp Ir 1U m 0 � Io p MA- N ----r- ..�..-- ❑ xo m D �� ;o p 0 O Ip in op 0 LL 1 I CO I I Q p aI Q I v a I 1 o l0 1In N -❑ U L� 0 o j P IFn d1 i____i ____ x co o ca 0 0 O C y c _R SV t7 C7 p N L R 1 0 l 0 6 ua C a) a �1ai•F:. ui a: s 0 cj 0 N 0 N C O IC{ 19 CL L ^ W t� 0 Page 628 n cl a ❑ P 'rvi aln C� p ri e+i I N L I ¢ co I T [� 0 m 0 � j ui cD c Vi to a I oo o ca I pp m F ri ri KV 0 jo O 0j 47 rD io m co Iw co 2 c� m r !� N m jG m a1 P I N I N I mnl o I� m L I o ti N I din I n I n m i w� rn to of oo Ie o III N �� I v jn a 101 m L[ d v [J N �49 - - - � t o m I -z:-: ,s a I G LL a.. oo I pJ r N � I m pap 14 O �c v IM R CJ I � I� Mi I N N I I� a Ia a 1U m 0 � Io p N m D LL Page 628 0 0 Page 629 N P ' tl7 N p q Lfl m '1 n1 4 Cl a m 00 (] n ie7 I v! I I d I d Z f I P i N I � f d___T ..__r CV f I '--r � U C �a jpd ad x �T as NO A I to c N --'-r---- C7 fa Iq a c U a i N C'Y o u O f [r! CD ui w F4 Iv Im on o o Im m ---4-- -r^•- ~ bra M U O �o Fvn7 n I O la o N N " f 0 � m ui a IC Ir° m 1m m � N � U d C [p a � . Eli in ' G Q 0 o I o I 0 la 1� a n Im r u7 ru 1 f o v LO ��] 1 N kY 1N Ia 10 D N rn Fo 0 � C I�tl� o IC 14p O_ v jN p � fA 2P O [C I I r LU o I nj cv �L? b fa is c 7 {� LL 1 g Q Le)mg D t T I G a io I n n I N L] 0 1 f - ry � _.. ..�.__• iry m 4 Q ! o low p 01 o I I q I O xa d C ry I ltnP cn� M x C, O I� Y -r- -- I o to I� m n p I �a ai ' co --_ 10 1 a(7 CV la a I mI o i o ;o iia o C? v N NI G W 0 ? ❑ i� -0CD rLLI f1M11-i C CV 0i' 40 C InV pQ 0 iC_---- -- f I___ OD Qj j U i Ln vli�. 1'2J o to la o N l� v :. iLl ::i'C •.. VLU :..:�:.. N U in z F C7 1 ocli Page 629 2 CL r!-7 Nr O N O N CM LV ❑ [77 N ri co O N ❑ W W M c O N 137 C❑ C W W M U G N 0 c c o C) +� L 14 N rL C (1) O L- U 13N C17 � 0 Nu o' N 4 N SD D a o o a Ir n v7 u I I Q p •m o • to m m I I z rY O I I I � I 1 i d o rIQ v S U p o toC iu4-i� I o l a p vpi� v v Im m I ! In vj to -----...�---- N'a 0 a is iuvi N m o Fo j� tt F m F nl N Q N U❑ Iln I 0 10 In n 0 a o I Id Iv v N — LO 00 m 1m O V 9 V � m I I C3 4 O I O I'T O d C O cli I _ [moi 4L ~ m j r ] 1 1 f N In m o w us xa I p I� I N Nai r ry I � ! I M EL1 "ooh � to l0 0 � I rvm� r co le) n N aM,2 I� I n p u o i G I civ ni CL N N c iv to 0 a I v n 1 ra i �p o Iv 11v N ' I I I I N 0 d la fpr- I c ocn q VJ p !o cmc �v �p o Q ip Ln V ❑ 0 I I u� 1 so ,o C iD �4 D p x O v n I I Iv lM Io =m n mo v Iv rp n N C7 o I I Iv Im I I 10 0 L7 o I� io I I 0 R N I LV N CD N 0 N i wC� V L ;14' 0 Page 630 ;o p N a Q a Ir n v7 u U p •m o • to m m ni rY O I � I I i I U Im m P co vo fv � N 0 o I ca m F nl N Q Iln I In a o ; Nr N — LO m 1m V A m Lq LOI eo I cli I _ [moi 4L ~ m j r 1 i.7 I o I ca m o �^ xa a I I r ry I � M M EL1 � I rvm� r co le) n N aM,2 I� I n I a I v n 1 ra i IN ' I D iC 0 t �p o Q ip Ln V 0 1 so ,o x O co i °�° w M jN N r L7 I m m N I LV N 'o m Page 630 E ,o v N ,n C] q ' 't+ wm Lr; La D � �rn m •N N o n 2 I I o . c u`vs uNi 1 1 avi I m O o I� m O � E opo lI z I d 4 i n T CQ� Z N N CD l l 0 4 C• C O O D In o n N M I u7 CL N ; LA ❑ L � Q — LO 0 IG Icm LLLII � o ! I G C4 N 1C JN fV Co g 10 1r ri r _4 ---- I 0 0 to to Lo C _ o 0 I �! o in � �nl n w 2 Ia Iin a ! m n n I ca 7 I N 01� N N l0 4 10 v in Ic r ni c n to la 0 to !n a o 1rn m Q 1 m OD IL 1 I _Y- ----F----F- Cf) � j civ m N ❑ �Nc �i 239 o to to n I to 0 v 00 1 IQ l00 0� N 0 i7 �N O 1v v LL m CA 10 = 0 1 4 t o v ria o 10 Ea 0 M U)----� ---Ir---- r I W a 09 io 1 p a fl n l0 1C v !Z -..-�----�- ❑ � oto 10 0 l G r p o p o v 71] ILS T � p 1p 1�O -_• ---r ---- 140 r b ? I 1 o jo jtn- n zg o10 [0 so (D a. U. o k 4 ----I ___•; •--- x 0 l0 1¢ v N o I� Icr70 uav CO I I o In Iv i I LO to En n ❑ 1 -�- I w -- x o 10 1 M w C O a Ip Iq o =p N +L+ C9 0 !a Im m N Oa Ip to a N CV G V I 1 C LU ro CT E _ >> RT E Page 631 ,o v N n C] q ' 't+ wm Lr; La U � �rn m •N N o I N Z I I 1 1 avi I m O o I� m opo lI O I 4 11Ni n T Z N N N_______ D In o n N M I u7 CL ; LA O A L � o LLLII � o I Co g LL ri r I a Lo _ I acrd � �nl n w 1� a ! m n n I ca 7 I N 01� N N l0 4 10 v R Ic c 1rn m Q 1 m OD � j civ m 1 i7 :0 LL Page 631 CV ri r.6 C) N D 2 w w U c v N Q,7 7 O 2 w _w U 0 c� � r to Ivi cY'n .n o Y U � o o © .d o 2 N � F I I D Cl o Io jm to lore I I � 1 I I I1J [ I I 10 Iv t I v P I O z a *JIL o vo I I I r7 to I� v ca U 1 I 1� 11mn kn r v I oD a a r 1 --j lireto I� m � Po ! 1 Ia fa a f I I k2 U o1� IC r � m 6 O G d to o nj I o I r N In P c I I Iv I m 10 loo JM m od � 1 n (m 1 b M I! ] n I r� iJ o O c e 0 Page 632 � r to Ivi cY'n � o 1 n I n o � F Cl o Io jm to lore v�`' Kd I I1J ro I 10 Iv t I v P lO 10 O a *JIL �IL 1 I LL r v I oD r 1 n I n F w Ip ISM t m c"r C, o f 0 !� 0 U N 0 d1 Lp d 4 O Q {q P c I I Iv I m 10 loo JM m od � 1 n (m 1 b M I! ] n I r� o O c e Lq o 2 o jo ju�i � 0 4 [ O I C l O o o hl V L7 op v p l0 1ci I _i � N � e C a1 G C (� m Q1 a T° 0 Page 632 � r to Ivi cY'n 0 1 n I n o f I Cl o Io jm to lore v�`' I 0 I 10 Iv t I v P lO 10 O 1 I o r v I oD r 1 o I n F w Ip ISM t m c"r C, o f !� 0 I r to In I I N 0 1R IT Lp d 4 O Q $ '--r---Y---- P c I I Iv I m 10 loo JM m od 9 1 n (m 1 b M I! ] n I r� o f I Iv Iv Iv 1v c e Lq o o jo ju�i � 4 [ O I C l O o o I [ In Im to Ica m op v p l0 1ci I _i 0 Page 632 0 0 Page 633 b N H Q C> C%j Z I f i I y cu - _ - - - • Y - - - N Q IN N N D p IG o f'p I wUD 4 CP U T o I� Ir i o to U g a I � N V o V 6 m 0 N m sn o jvmi In M Iq j C I Q I O C CV � [A C an LO Ni ! I 0 q: I i s r� Q 3 LO C'tl to lu c ifl fm9 c "; c� D CC t I cn Ill d I f tlJ ova Q I ! o 'a N C� M tib o to o m0, FFo LL N 2'-F I 1 O Ir Ip K O EO N 4 d I ra I m �II Ilia a, o 'r5 IN o xa Lu U �a [l. o 1� Icon m p 10 ICS O j� LL x f I N � 4 i p l04 lop o C7 I cp ! 1p " 0 N m loLLJ C4 0 in CD I LO LO LU U IN m O U +. UI IN In N d to C Z5 , o I 1 ry n U C al D O � L) 01 o f o I o o N :L (� m G U T '� •� ~ N LO vi �I Page 633 rtl' d' CD N 6 tt3 f� CV 0] Cn iV O LO N M CL CV Cl? C4 0 iV a W W ro U c O N 0 0 ii W 11J M U N _c a C ❑ C) U7 U 7 0 U} C F- 4) N CIO C [u (/) 0 0 Page 634 -- - - h - - - - - - - - I I Q I I � I Z I f I I I I 2 o to fo U 0 I I 16 0 m I I ❑ o a n I m o I . r to r7 p I Q I w o 6 rn c o �� 0 I I 3ryV Iv n myc rn� t I r LL _4 iC g I I fm Ir�i f I n o IT' ln m lip I I . 0 0 � o Io i Ic m ID" c I I In Im m f I tya O I I. v) p d l o I l o n l o w d I co ! o O I I I N I W O Q o fti In [ I w� N I ! I 0 � Ia IBry'] nIm CC U s ;� r 0 Page 634 Page 635 P : r, n Q - m OP N a v m P C, ry a N Lq M p 1 I z cm ! I O_,.__-__..�____ __. 1 = o jM j� p o ! v I `r CV U o I o I P v P c toU Iv !Q a i ci ❑ N Q I p 1 N n giM i m N O m" C} m C Ru 0 It o i i F p m P ! to N F M v Ln N M rn �+"+ r..__ C Q to Irq NM P IM to O M M n P jmi jCi o4 N _v ICP Iln -2 Lq� Nrn Cv ❑ U N p _ o 0 O U o n M Q o c m 0 I Ma M C I V i 11 f 0 17 N N T T o 0 ODD C gni v ICM loco ori vo j� _� "S5a 'I'I lea Iia mQ •xM m m ❑ CSS 4 FAM lg o C1 `26 o I !n vi n-- m f37 '2 0 I� fw � S R F m LO m Q j� na o 1 tii I m m 04 a4 ❑ a foo [�10 sT2 cP T m T xiL �n iv LUQ o ----r'---r-^-- cc 7 jP I c Ic7 Iln oa a In a ____ In fva �4 0 IL P o a 0. -0 0 f 10 I --^'� ----�'---- W ---- x o O �n� �o� o 1o�v faq o N O rn D m N Irn� loop c o � 'I ui I iri v C) r C I N ! V m N N i3N U) o j v v ry U a a 1 to Lo w so Q [a1 -- --r---- C ++ �• O ---- N C O h C. o jm jo rvi I p I V p rn o rn 0 o N ¢ m m p LU LU 3 o y c a C 0 = @7 � Page 635 0 0 r- n N N r• ' d n 0 mp a ria O I Z I I r I Q u N U Lq Qo Ln 4 1 p p M v uN7 ! ^ cv C) t I ur 0 Ln o - - m C4 mEL �o d 1 p O I N[ry N la ry 7N V fa a c �0 0 I am � � I Q i6 m Q m 1 �F � io vni O 10 G _ 1 Mp w co 0 n Ip n ❑ 9 T a C O 1 I j p I I rn� I � d I I I NvQ0 1 co ❑ I M I � p 1 L) N J N CV (i ry IM j m 7 m 1 eM0 o � v m 1 a I q I [U Ip i ?� o [� p Page 636 N o n m n Q � q N p q •[p'] r � T p N IL D 6 I f Z P 1 I N I 1 n v po Irn !r 1 L7 o CIS � ----�--..�..-- ❑ N Q PO LO 1m M o 1V or6 n a $ a �� �N ry 0 U -••-••---r- Ico Irp o jca7 jm v ry C 0 0 9 ca v O ❑4 U in Ur01 o ;v jn 4n d Q N N N N ri] �Ly O i ' d G !p m 14C] (wnio y1 d rr n !�o �o E cc fU ca ru LL a p C o O CL �] p m� a o Ir Im d �o 0 co 0 (Di6 no o j w j m p d p cz, m p My ❑ '�� � fmp Icryu, c' wq W a o In 1m i I 0 to 10 � x I f po I p I m N p d i p a I p d p irr Ir o N o ! m Q I m d 0 Ly7 I v'i I ui C) N D qo 1°'1m iv I4 v N Q�1 L3 c7 �+ W a In m 0 u �• � o to Irl o 0 ri 0 '�1 y FFo ❑ .. o _ LU 3 f1Y O OlLO ; v ' �• f0 m � C � a O M 0 r- n N N r• ' d n 0 mp a ria O I Z I I r I Q u N U Lq Qo Ln 4 1 p p M v uN7 ! ^ cv C) t I ur 0 Ln o - - m C4 mEL �o d 1 p O I N[ry N la ry 7N V fa a c �0 0 I am � � I Q i6 m Q m 1 �F � io vni O 10 G _ 1 Mp w co 0 n Ip n ❑ 9 T a C O 1 I j p I I rn� I � d I I I NvQ0 1 co ❑ I M I � p 1 L) N J N CV (i ry IM j m 7 m 1 eM0 o � v m 1 a I q I [U Ip i ?� o [� p Page 636 0 in C O C D ; C O U a 0 m ^ o n N o r an C, 0 o 4 � I I ❑ a o o •c w 3 _m � I I O � I � ❑ N I un'1 U cn � o � v M Q F I ! Ca = p t m i OuNa Ln v i Lq I I o 0 f` m Q0 i v � o o m Lti U a o is Imo �o U O G o la IV a ❑ o c 7� I I u� u] N i ____i __-- 1 !m o m 4 0 ! 4 O � j4 0 0 N M N -'u; 'n I Ia � a I v L l I o � o io �m ami O U.1 1�10 7 u� ! N ❑ ro Im LL a I G I I m + I ❑ a m O b N a I P I N m 2 vAi to m a 4 �O �rn pmj 0 r L I W o co I o m L � - - v] I O 4nff C ne O � I v a ! M s ❑ I m� I C1 U I m i!1 o I c I V ❑ N I N N i ni I r cn .0 ni a o I o I p o m o I p o Ic I 0 U' I a Iw o a ry � o �C fa I I I D � ❑ � G N n in IC I M v co c a 16 o P b P MO xa C i4O 'tea Ls7 � 1 f ❑ m`n o fo Im � ❑ m ry a� i I o rC Io to lid v �o �4 6 I ) _ b la ro v N e p '-r-'--r-^^- S1 vn o In Iv a ❑ 'x b o I Ivo 1� c. ul I E r � 7 01 a P a io I.P 10 ❑ ? c e IZ Id Io oP ❑? f I Q' a C'7 I I Sp I I N +O_+ o I o I o lm rw m O a o P •r --------- ❑ ---- LU C x ❑ o In I- [V 2 o in l0 0 U v I f 3 C .N r N i ❑ I r � !oo Im N 4 N r O i ❑ IM y C LL] •7 C l6 'Vcz :D CID in C O C D ; C O U a 0 Page 637 m ^ o n N o r an C, V I I h � I I 3 U O � O � I � ❑ N I un'1 U cn � o of v M Q F Ca = p t m i OuNa Ln v i Lq m Q0 i m ' � I a U O G p o c m 4 0 ! 4 O � f -'u; 'n I Ia � a I v L l I o Li a O U.1 1�10 7 u� ! LL a I I I a m oho I o m g� vAi to � a o !0 0 r I W o co I o m L � v] I O 4nff ula � I v a ! M s LL I m� I C1 I � i!1 o I c I V V N I N N i ni I r cn m a m I m o I p i U' I a Iw o a ry a o �C fa I � ❑ � G 16 a ~ o Page 637 C7 CV O N N ca N v _) m ca CL N CEJ cD C] N 2 w LU C ❑ N U7 7 0 W LL to U w;l 0 iV O C'V E 0 U V t35 L U L ►l 4 At 0 y 0 o 0 0 0 N O m rn o �o •m m i N N ❑ I I I i I Z � � , I ! I t I I 1 I 'ar a l0 rn 0 U u o 'o rc I I m o M N Q. O _ o f m co U .. I I u7 ._ I__ -r- vi 0 o !o 'm m a fa IN n a v o CA F I o io 'o`Di � � ----r----r ---- ' N Ip I� Z a Io 1N a_ o a I a I 7V m c la Im a O iu U ❑ F a Ir o la P m o j c cti CL +� t I I 5`O I C, I p 1 0 C Lry O 'O 'O O N wn o jp d� I t N f Md H n bN o 4o I I t v I d a I _4 ---- v 0 xEL ul � I� �F o to 0 mC" I I .r N I I I jQ c �a fia �o v Uj 4 ] O O O O o 9 o IQ to v Int n I �0. ik tIp .. .�..---r---- r m 0 ❑ Iv lam o� .C� C7 4 r0 %Ma Ma a I N f Ivy �v L17 M Iv I I [v r.' !I- --_r----F---- - ,n n I I Da. c I I I� Ini [tag n LL o �o 1c e I� ----i - --r- - -- I N 4 goOW Iv I'oo O ❑ rn o vo �Q Arno pv dn,0 o IN M I r� I I I m ❑ ❑ 4 fd I� W 0 0 � o oo In tr x ❑ v �o Im In m � ca Iv I I 0 a la Im �o �v m v c� iV O C'V E 0 U V t35 L U L ►l 4 At 0 Page 638 y 0 o 0 0 0 N O m rn i N N I Z , I I I 'ar a l0 rn 0 U N O _ o f m co U d �v v I I� 0 I � � 3 ' Z 0 La O iu ❑ F a Ir o la a g o j c cti CL t 5`O I N � L� o to 0 wn d� I t N f Md LL I _4 ---- o I.- � �F o to 0 I jQ O �y a Uj 4 ] O O O O , I I �0. ik tIp r ,Qj 'vo ❑ In �o C7 I Q, a p� 0 I N N I I I [v m ,n n I I I m ap x ❑ I� I I� o IN M �4 C 0 0 � o Page 638 0 CD L� Page 639 ,r P P m r Q Lf7 � Q 2 I I I i � � 1 I CV U p la 1ptlp P �O N•--4----r'--_ q a C] I in o J. I� r � Id In n - � N O Q C dr-...rtyrrr` ter.. 0 !a Im u1 a g � Id Id Ca Q a 1 I p m ,nco �ry 4 1 4 I u p ip IC]p q� a W p 0 cPi� 'o i0 1-0 O Id I E n n Rimm + I O mLLa D Q q 16 16 q CL Go ---- - ja jLLn vPi 1 a QS o IG !r D N Q LD s is to O o I p I G P a C a � � W co a _ to Iv a CD LL C Q 6 ____�•-__�•-__ Q7 X C7 I P I m N O o ma C� fP I°rP Cl? !q Ir I I _ O rQIP o I q A N � �' f] 4 td D CO11 C 0 w I p I p p V ji ----r'•_-�-'-- C 0 s 0 0 0 is jc o O [] � LU i ' a 6 U E; N t„7 CD L� Page 639 0 Page 640 ,n n d ,ItD I I O2 1 N CD N v o t in I m ey N [_] o io ICooll No aj � I m ri a n qq ion 1n m 1 I o n �o it ri F r E O U U a m F 1 a CV oin 14 n 10 In 4 O00 cna n Q JO f m On I I g a N LJL 111 n O co Iq IR h i iV N ry o j n m mN 1 v vii o i o 1 4 G Cyd o �c =o 0 IV CL 0O [A 1 I m c Io f 1uJdi tn 0 d q G q O 7`n� � jn O x[L io Imp e�vn L ill ro f �� m n I I I W n:C I o Ib IM fl I I p o I o l o m 6 m Oo N N L7 rte- n t c o In a CV D I I - ----� ----� ---- I.I_I4 .�n f n 1 w w 0 d o a q inEo 0 iei Ica i I vU i1C v ` c, Io I- N C7 Q Iq fp o Q7 N o n 0 a .. ..:::.. aw W L a Y R rs 21 Page 640 0 0 Page 641 • c1d r. q � 1 I '--'1 CSV h N OD C) M f• � � I v ro � � _ M [G I CD LP ❑ IN Q ' �m yarn oa c F m I rc N I r, a n r� > C oim Iain ..Y ..Y. 'm 2 N Try •Y•r Y..Y• Uw U m E a a M :m ;a, U 7 D L n I U') •Y..Y. Le) m l m rrl � Ci0 kA co a � o Io c Ip .�..r •.f. Z cm ` �7 C IZt1S c • a' r c'7 cv C1) a o o a CCS LLo i n N 2 n I °p i i I v o+ o I o 0 ' (L N ICV .= 7. I I 1 6 d 10 I� •D d ---�--•• ~ oiol�l rn p io iL :ii - of of Iz: c6 6 I 1 N a 1 M 10) 1 F� I 1 X o to QS I I 1 a_ � I� u I 1 r Z FLE y i i i a' In 'm 'Q 1!] I!7 � I 1 1 Q d IL N co _ IN N QIRIW:CU l0..F-- ----F• m X101' I� N rJ 1 1 7C I I I T I i I N U 1 1 cm Q IV i i i `❑ i i� �� N oio O 1 0 ........... O7 I CX1 103 , C? 1 ! 1 O O W � W m I I 1 I I 0 N IN • U 1 I 1 FKd}� __•- a O 10 � a --- •-- I �. . -: ❑ w x ,� 2 �� .6 I , Cc 0 � N JrL •� m p rz D 0 n it i•, a S:Y: co•3: F O I v co r• N L71 1 Z••c • id W J : . CD I �a'•`: •� x d cn �• •gca •� A c ry;s n • •�•� rn : Q Q. ❑ ro GY b •L 'L z • m a} E a • p1 LL Ci Ci • [C • C Page 641 0 1►n 0 lb � I I� F n In = O CL .O .0 Q N z d a O 4 ,tt o Iq n7« W 06-.F op a I , 1 LZ o 0 Q I i I co 0 FS7 LO a Q C3 o to � 1 I o m O - cl) co p jp j p j p N c �c 1 a to U'D LO a to ip Io � T 1rn O N o -j LO .c a. w b �Q to LO to C13 is � o io io 10 07 Q io i4 �o O U o In ir' i Lo i u' ai 1 �? f !2 1 r� I 1 O o io 10 io o IC) x I I ❑ Imo] I Iw 2 rn 1rn !rn �Ln Q o �v en " Lrs O I p I p 1 4 1� o ! o p N N N I N CG1 Go co fb C17 c = g I I c) l0 I ,p p jp jp �p n C 0, 1� °L '-- ce) it I O Q 0 M Ca [tl' w C I 1 I Ip Z ,2a f LO LO = Ir Ir 1, - 'U^ a Ip to Ip 4 itl0 d ''C7 N > Com'] co Cl)LO— i Cly c V7 I Cl) I C•j Lo N CV I I cc I O I� Ip Ip U d aD ; txi r 14 G1 .fl J � "o �L7 � p LU �[ �-+COQ+ GD o ip i0 ;p I I O, O J p ! 10 O rp IO CQ Ip O p Irl; Ln Iii tn 1,"l . Ln Ln I N w o U � ❑ U] a ; t � N u ' c a �' M crc L11LI1 z W N `- C� L)-tz (D N 7 I it 0 1►n 0 lb � I I� F n In [V a) n (J ! [7 N z O 1 O o Iq LZ t ID � � LV U O 1 4 o to � 1 I o m O - v ,o c �c 1 a to 1 1 � � T 1rn O N o n �o .c a. w b r o aam CL C13 is L .. O U o Page 642 I I� F n In [V (J ! [7 N LZ o !o ID � � LV 1 1 , ul I o m 1 n In 1 a to 4� O ! p O 1 N tI] o !ra .c a. w b r o aam CL n 1 1 Iq Ir? in : l o I 1 m iw o IC) x I I ❑ Imo] I Iw 2 n ,n o �v 1� o ! o CX C !� n 0, Ca [tl' w C Z ,2a Page 642 Page 643 a --'•h•--------� Q v Iv aa f a4 m Z o �o lO iqp �o Iw O o i lo o to id i� jm Iv {43 n 1+ c] o Iv ino c c �uD n O no Io i� ILo Iv c N 0 p is o ip �o Im i+f c [1Y - -r .... ---+� -- ❑ o o- 1 a In 10 Io o o 0 o 0 %p Ir c o 6 -........ 1 G] b I l [j wu �nl n to o iQ ,m j d 1� lo� t %� a io Iv info i� li c 7 lila j C ' 4 I m 1 to 1 7 � a Qh o iQ to il_nnv o CL ❑- I� ,n info c • mo I o to ;s j� iN O LO _ N > o � I F 1 I � 1 { v o fp o Foo 0 C1 co U � N o Io I 1?p IM Ir• �-, L X Q o iv a io ;ojm 11, im m o (n U O 10 1 � C) N O d io v to 'coif lm in a o n y.. Z----+--- - WLLJ 1 Q) 0c O 1 1 'rn �G cr] N [» N � tl t o Io i o N 6 to v U I , I z.;z yrkm:.:1. o [SS LD m e l N 1 !n IN D W W CD C 2 1 of N- 1 N_ cu ,E: an 1 rn lr . r L r U 04r; N oa .a m`m cfn Page 643 Q7 C 0 U Vl ro U ❑ CI} LO pp C N O c� C N 0] N M t C CL C!} V tl] O it N N 0 Q] [7� x MI m d 0 Page 644 I ;2 9 U� O c 1 N d a cv n �� UD O kL d a !a 013 � o m a 1 d t o l o c ar � o m ^ to Ka n do D I d l 0 1 4 p LU a 4 I d I m S 1II O 9 IC l o0 ;n p I� Vo 0 10 1� rm 1v a m n{ d ! n i 1 1 O D a d d lO 1 o lr 4 0 11p rm I� p m I � , m 1 � D ci N , U R o jc a to lv ocy iv�i¢ T: c o �o to '0 1^ r I Eli q 3 I , Z r i r I 1 0 i S I o Iv , n ro lum28 m j ' o N 0 D c jc ;v l0n ludo a o to to I^ C { w I 1 � j 1 I I � ! O 40 1 Q 1 f p O Cl q o o l0 I I Q 1� jr K 4 14 I- V 0 1a rm Ip �1 4p w ;m =r7 N m w C 0 1a n Ip sem. C d C 0 uja o !d to INo 0 N 1n ui 2� u ' .az :VC 0 Page 644 I ;2 n O c 1 N d a d C1 O � o n �� UD O a !a 013 �rrl Ipv m a 1 d t o l o c p to ,`� Ica n do D I d l 0 1 4 p p 4 I d I m S 1II O 9 IC l o0 ;n p I� OD o 0 10 1� rm 1v a N n{ d ! n i 1 1 O D a d d lO 1 o lr 4 0 0 1 11p rm I� p m I � , m 1 � o ci , , N o jc a to lv ocy iv�i¢ T: c o �o to '0 1^ r I Eli q I , r i r I 1 0 i S I o Iv , n ro lum28 a j ' o - c jc ;v l0n ludo a o to to I^ p { i I 1 � j 1 I I � ! O 40 1 Q 1 f p O Cl q o o l0 I I Q 1� jr K 4 14 I- V 0 1a rm Ip o !o o 4p w ;m =r7 N m w C 0 1a n Ip sem. d C In iCp pp o !d to INo 0 1n i W en �o u ' .az :VC C ip ❑ , N 0 41 � • G1C OOr C F 0 Page 644 00 N O co N Q7 �7 CL N [•7 0 R1 "C7 W i.l.l ca C) C 0 N ❑ 2 LLI (Z U 0 N U 0 o o I ' a z � 2 I m vo ivo o la N ,q I o o isr I 4 � 4 ---- I I 6 I � 0 so m a v � ❑ ❑ 47 , n m Y , m I ! o I O ! I Fv- !� Urnion v o I O l ni v ov Dov n in CL m im o 4 I p Q Ln R C V Xg �o Iqo 1 I of N I D fL- �I 14 C z m ' "Q od ioo �F ov Dov P n In m 'w X 0 - m O O p 0 La y � I 3 o. � I R 7 I I o to n - 1m loo ` o Q Vi i o �o m ov C7 o I o o io m �d 0 14 to oar, op o� 2 m a I o O i� x 2 v I v I o v o ff _L is m I I 0 Page 645 Q io �4 0 I i i ---- I I � I C,v m a v � ❑ I Iov o v ^v �. I i�v Y � a I ! o I O ! e7 N CJ 2 q Iv Iv v ~ I I d 1 I N N �I 14 C z I I U P m � I I � o to Ion vN n - 1m loo ` vow vv o ro I ov I I 0 14 to oar, �� x 2 v I v I o v o I i I l I I r. cv 1 I L a- i ---- I I CD m .�F o to lav ov I !n n r� 0 14 Iov ov v x a 1 Ivv v q a f I 1L I 1 I r f ov I I o o 0 W I I v ir v ----�-------- r I I I m v, m a UU I I o 0 io 0 I ! 1 I m o I I r ll� -II ---r----r---- � N to Ivv M G N N I 1 ❑ � c ? U , d R Ute' 7 0 V 2f Ip y 'p m j ❑ v_ C] ❑ a. N ~ � Page 645 0 11 41- Z5 m CLF G7 E CL O' W Page 646 O DC7 0 4 � i I �? Q i V Z I I Q I I •- o ! f� U I Foa va cm 1 o c a r _ _ _ _ r 0 I I 0 l O i q p 6 L, II7 N b r I C o cli ! I v IN o °0 f d � 10 I I � N ❑ D D F U Q f d I O ,❑ y� ,n o Iv Ivo v o� D �� o la low mrsi co c mry o 0 o e CV xb o 10 Ioo C4 C] ----� ----r ---- N N a I I 0 m O� C ti a I r [b CL ---^ ---- r ----r tl] a� a Io Iav �v Q yDj fn � a I� lov xa. vg a3 I I U a D7 LL ! I x ry r t o 0 a CV CD O I I0 m ! to v Q -r- --- i'f 0 I laa cu 0,0Lu O C !a ! I C � I1J Q1 C V ro l.l..f y r U cm CO �I 11 41- Z5 m CLF G7 E CL O' W Page 646 � � I n LO « \ � N & � O 2 e y ƒ r \ LL f � k ° § ) / { j \ } U 3 R 9 / \ 2 9 \ E 2 / co 2 r ± E / � / � » KCL r- 0 ƒ R / / k J!) { m ) 2 w J & \ \ -7 ƒ E K k > ( ( � % C 2 . � \ LU cr w L & k b 2 > / § q 0 0 Page 6 7 0 Technicn€ Copsuitation, luta An9lysis and Litigation Support for Iho Environment Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP Education: 0 1640 5111 St.., Suite 204 San to Santa Monica, California 90441 Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: mha emann@swa e.com Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Hiunboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified HydrogeoIogist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 7S years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from Perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 - present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 - 2014; ■ Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); Page 648 0 L� • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 — 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998); ■ Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 — 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 — 1998); ■ Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 — 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 —1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 —1986). Senior Resulatory and Litigation Su art Anal st: With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included: ■ Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. ■ Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. ■ Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. ■ Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California, ■ Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE Iitigation. ■ Fxpert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. ■ Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following: ■ Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit Iiability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 Page 649 0 Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. Page 650 0 0 Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director. As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt ted efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. H dro eol As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. ■ Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water, • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 Page 651 0 0 Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: ■ Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis For significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent Iaws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NKDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and Iandfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -stale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. ■ Co-authored two papers an the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Po_ licv Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. ■ Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water. Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an FPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process. ■ Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. Page 652 0 Geology: 0 With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hilislope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following; Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. Conducted aquifer tests. Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at Ieast one course per semester at the community college and university levels: At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physics[ geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beath, California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Tgstimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F,, 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. Page 653 0 0 Brown, A., Farrow, I., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases From Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2001 A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association, Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay), Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association, Hagemann, M.F., 2002, An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. Page 654 0 0 Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost For MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP -61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabo], M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting, E� Page 655 0 0 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. 0 Page 656 0 0 Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and SOILL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE ESW7:A7PE Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 20l Santa Monica, California 9(1405 Attic; Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Mobil: (310) 795-2335 OYiice: {310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email mse feldCri zwune.corn Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Education: Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Ph.D. Sail Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999, Dissertation on VOC filtration. M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. 'Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991, Thesis on wastewater lreatmenl. Professional Experience: Dr. Rosenfeld is the Co -Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPS). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling, oil spills, boilers, incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs. PAHs, dioxins, Furans, volatile organics, semi -volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, MtBF., fuel oxygenates and odor. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs recommended by California Air Quality Management Districts. Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPS); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health, 2003.to 2405; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001 ; Adjunct Professor Ali icon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King Counry, Seattle, I996— 1999; Scientist James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Bureau of Land Management, Kremnrling Colorado 1990; Scientist October 2015 Rosenfeld CV Page 657 0 Publications: s Chen, J. A., Zapata, A R., Sutherland, A. J., Molmen. D. R,. Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632. Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Atnsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J.. Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, 1L. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125, Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (20I0). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of'Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46, Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing, Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Atnsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and Furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255, Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. 1. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organnhalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, 1. J. I. Clark, Rosenfeld, F.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research, 105, 194-197, Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. 1. Claris, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Waler Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Wafer, and Air in American Cities, Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing, Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I,H. (Me]) (2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel, Water Science and Technology. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, 11J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, I.H. (Me]) (2007), The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities, Water Science Anel Technology. October 2015 2 Rosenfeld CV Page 658 0 0 Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark. I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Wafer Environment Federations Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Binsolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carron Wood Ash, Water Science and Technolo&,, 49( 9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Binsolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment .Research. 76(4),310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Dftice, Publications Clearinghouse (MS -6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application, Journal of Enviropinienial Quralin° 29, 1662-1658. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Binsolids Odorants, Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C, L., (2001). High carbon woad ash etlect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Wafer F.nvirorrnwnt Research. 131(1-4), 247-262. Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. lleritage Magazine of S1. Kitts, 3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts, Biomass Users Network, 7(1). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Binsolids Application To Forest Soil. doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California. October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV Page 659 0 Presentations: 0 Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 441h Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T,; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M,; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St, Louis, Illinois. Urhan Environmewal Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 1923, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon. AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Wafer Protection Council .Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Wu, C., Tani, L.. Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States, Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Manugenrent of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Mass Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23''t Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts. Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23x1 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Woad Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23"d Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA, Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, FAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama, The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J,J,J. (August 21 - 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 20th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants - DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. ❑ctober 2015 4 Rosenfelt{ CV Page 660 0 0 Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collectcd Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005), Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8IPFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA, Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Retnediation FEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference, Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3 -TCP. PEMA Etnerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California, Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealev's Groundwater Conference, Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005)_ Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals, International Society of Environniental Forensics: Focus Dna Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted From Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Latif, Conference. Lee ture conducted from Wyndham BaItiinore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005), Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2405 National Groundivater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundxater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois, Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting oJ' the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann. M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of Tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ, Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. Cal jornia Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Synntposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National GrounrlwaterAssociation. Southwest Focus Con jerence. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2043). Underground Storage Tanis Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forurn. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. October 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV Page 661 0 0 Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- I0, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes, Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic.' Environment. International Wafer Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2042). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Q(j Flavors in the Aquatic Environrnenl. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14,2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted From Indianapolis, Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofiltcr control of compost odor. Biotest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000), Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California, Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L, Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. ( 1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids For odor reduction. Soil Science Society ofAmerica. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Sail. Biofest, Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry. R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With Iiigh-Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C,L. Henry, R. B. Harrison. and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soii. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted From Anaheim California. October 2015 6 Rosenfeld CV Page 662 0 0 Teachine Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health [Summer 2003 through 200 10) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants, National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois, April 1, 2.002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Sup erfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including; Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $4I,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2 00 1. Synagro Technologies, Corona Califomia: 510,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000. King County, I]epartmc:tt of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington; Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. 520,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997, James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993, Qctaber 2015 7 Rosenfeld CV Page 663 0 Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thcrmo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG 14711 115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September, 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winbum, ct al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.. LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico, ct al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105i44 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2415 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al. Civil Action N0, 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs, Del Oro Dairy, Del Orn Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter. Defendants Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition. May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17`h Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al.. Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-01 152-C Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr ct al. Plaipaiff, vs. Aruba et al, Dgendu+rt. Case Number cc -1 1-0 1 650-E Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Cormnon Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV Page 664 0 0 John Michael Abicht, et ai., Plaiwr fs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons, w12009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina, County of Aiken David Anderson, et al.. Plaintifs, vs. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number: 2007 -CP -02-1584 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plainnffis, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010 In the Ninth .Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapi des, State of Louisiana Roger Price, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Roy O. Martin, L.P., et al., Defendants. Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008 In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle ct al., Plainif fs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al.. Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV 1052 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker, et al., Plaintiffi, vs. Chevron Oil Company, et al., De%ndanrs. Case Number 1:05 CV 227 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2008 In the Fourth .Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabic, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number 07-2738 G In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Leon B. Brydels, Plainryj" , vs. Conoco, Inc., ct al., De/endanm Case Number 2004-6941 Division A In the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, I53`d Judicial District Linda Faust, Plaintit, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Witco Chemical Corporation AWA Witco Corporation, Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. and Koppers Industries, Inc., Defbidanrs. Case Number 153-212928-05 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006, October 2007 Rosenfeld Trial: January 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen, et al., Plainif(fs, vs. Nutro Products, Inc., a California Corporation and DOES 1 to I00, inclusive, Defendants. John Loney, Plaintiff, vs. James H. Didion, Sr.; Nutro Products, Inc.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case Number VCVVSO44671 Rosenfeld Deposition: Dccembcr 2009 Rosenfeld Trial: March 2010 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, ct al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, DeJetrdant. Civil Action Number 2:09-ev-232-WNA-TFM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011 October 2015 Rosenfeld CV Page 665 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and f'or the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley, Ylaitrt�fs, vs. Peter T. Hoss, as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration & Production Company, a Delaware corporation; Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc., a California Corporation; and DOES i through 100, Defendants. Case Number SCO94173 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008, October 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm, et al., all individually, Plaintiffs, vs. Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Union Oil Company of California. a California corporation; Chevron Corporation, a California corporation; ConocoPhillips, a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation; and DOES 1 though 100, Defendants. Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) Rosenfeld Deposition: January 2008 In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern District of Arkansas Harty Stephens Farms, Inc, and I Iarry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership, PlaintijJc, vs. Helena Chemical Company, and Exxon Mobil Corp., successor to Mobil Chemical Co., Deli ndrants, Case Number 2.06 -CV -00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel, et al„ Plaint fs, vs. Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Civil Action Number 07-4037 Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010 Rosenfeld Trial: Octo her 20I0 In the District Court of Texas 2151 Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis, Pletintff f vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Defendant. Case Number 25,151 Rosenfeld Trial: May 2009 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated. P1ai ntijfs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Dejendant. Case 3:10-cv-00522 Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, II ct al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Fanns, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013 October 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV Page 666 LEGAL SUPPORT NETWORK, LLC Advance Account 1405 W. 0lympis Bivd. Suite BOO, Las Angeles. {A 90015 211975.9850 _. PAY TO "CHF ORDER OF CONTROL NO. ISSUED TO: Y V California Bank & TrLFst J 7 C O 101 South Sari Pedro 1 J J Los Angel . CA 90012 20 j 0 ll■L3SDL,130 1:1220D33961: 302013S94L0 s.31 DOLLARS Page 667 RICON An Employee -Owned Company March 17, 2020 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Reference: 8545 Pecan Avenue Project (RECON Number 9471) Dear Mr. Van der Zwaag: This letter addresses the Appeal of Decision of the Planning Commission Approving Site Plans and Architectural Review of DRC2019-00590 for the Xebec Realty Warehouse Distribution Building on Assessor's Parcel Number 0229-171-02 (Attachment 1). The reasons for the appeal are stated in a letter dated February 11, 2020 submitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) Planning Commission by Lozeau Drury, LLP (Lozeau) on behalf of Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility (SAFER) challenging the environmental review conducted for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project (project). RECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON) disputes the arguments put forth by Lozeau and find them to be without merit. We have prepared responses to each of the Lozeau comments following a general introduction and review of the facts of the project and the use of Categorical Exemption (CE) for infill development under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project Description The 4.77 -acre project site is located east of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The project site is currently developed with a truck and trailer repair center with five buildings totaling approximately 10,200 square feet and is surrounded by residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest, and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties. Figure 1 shows the regional location of the project site and Figure 2 shows an aerial photograph of the project site and vicinity. As part of the project, the existing structures would be demolished and a 103,945 -square -foot warehouse that includes 95,945 square feet of warehouse space, 8,000 square feet of associated office space, and 10 loading docks on the east side of the proposed building would be constructed. The project would be accessed by two driveways off Pecan Avenue. Figure 3 shows the proposed site plan. Based on our review of the project, RECON determined that the project qualifies for CEQA approval under a Class 32 CE for infill development projects (CEQA Guidelines Section 15332). No exceptions to the exemption would apply. A discussion of how the project meets each of the criteria for the infill development CE is presented in our responses to comments below. 1927 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101 1 619.308.9333 1 reconenvironmental. com SAN DIEGO I BAY AREA I TUCSON Page 668 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 2 March 17, 2020 Figure 1 Page 669 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 3 March 17, 2020 Figure 2 Page 670 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 4 March 17, 2020 Figure 3 Page 671 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 5 March 17, 2020 Section 15332(a): The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project site is designated and zoned as General Industrial in the City General Plan. The project would be consistent with these land use and zoning designations. The project is limited to redevelopment of the project site and would not impact any adjacent uses. As described under Section 15332(d) below, the project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Additionally, the project has been designed to be consistent with all applicable development requirements listed in the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Section 15332(b): The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The project site consists of a 4.77 -acre property that is developed as a truck and trailer repair center. The project site is located within a fully urbanized area of the city and is surrounded by residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest, and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties. Therefore, the project is proposed within city limits on a site of no more than five acres that is substantially surrounded by urban uses. Section 15332(e): The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The project site is currently developed and served by all required utilities and public services. As described in Section 15332(a) above, the project is also consistent with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site. Therefore, the project would be consistent with development projections anticipated by the City's General Plan and would not create unanticipated demand for utilities such as water supply, wastewater treatment, or solid waste disposal. Similarly, consistency with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site would ensure that the project does not generate unanticipated demand for public services such as fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, and libraries. Responses to Comments 1. This is an introductory cover letter appealing the decision of the Planning Commission approval of the project to the City Council. The comment does not include any specific statement regarding the CEQA review process. 2. Lozeau, on behalf of SAFER, objects to the City's use of a Class 32 CE under CEQA and states that environmental review is required to analyze and mitigate project impacts on air quality, health risk, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. This is incorrect as a blanket statement. Under Article 19, Section 15300, of the CEQA Guidelines, the Secretary for Resources has found that certain classes of projects are categorically exempt from the preparation of environmental documents. This includes Class 32 projects, which are in -fill development projects. The proposed project is a textbook example of an in -fill project. 3. Lozeau, on behalf of SAFER, correctly restates the project description and the City's intent to deem the project categorically exempt from CEQA review as a Class 32 infill project. 4. The comment cites CEQA and states that the project is at the first step of the CEQA process. The reality is that the proposed project qualifies for the use of a Class 32 CE and is therefore not subject to the CEQA process. When a public agency decides that a project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the public agency approves or determines to carry out the project, the agency may file a notice of exemption. No environmental review under CEQA is necessary because CEQA does not apply to the project. Page 672 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 6 March 17, 2020 5. The comment correctly states that the City asserts that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA review as an in -fill project (Class 32). 6. The comment notes that Lozeau believes that there are two relevant exceptions to CEQA exemptions that are applicable to the proposed project; significant effects associated with unusual circumstances and cumulative impacts. Neither of these claims is applicable to the project. As described in the discussion under Section 15332(d) below, the project would not result in a significant environmental impact for any of the environmental categories called out for this exemption. Additionally, the project does not constitute an unusual circumstance because it is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations and would be similar in nature to existing industrial use currently on the project site. Furthermore, the project would be similar in nature to industrial uses and warehouses surrounding the project site. The project is roughly the same size as other warehouses in the area and would provide services that are similar in nature to the surrounding industrial and warehouse uses. Similar industrial and warehouse uses surrounding the project are listed below: • South Bay International, located at 8750 Hickory Avenue, consists of a 9.5 -acre, 215,748 -square -foot warehouse. • Acra Machinery, located at 13173 Arrow Route, consists of a 1.93 -acre, 38,856 -square -foot warehouse. • Heartland Express, located at 8566 Pecan Avenue, consists of a 4.83 -acre, 16,710 -square -foot truck terminal. • K -Vac Environmental Emergency Services, located at 8615 Pecan Avenue, consists of a 4.75 -acre warehouse/storage facility. • DiCarlo Productions Recording Studio, located at 8657 Pecan Avenue, consists of 1.34 acres, 18,294 square feet of light industrial uses. As described in response to comment 11 below, the project would not result in any cumulative impacts. 7. The comment states that there are limitations to the use of in -fill exemptions and that the analysis completed to date should be withdrawn and that a draft Environmental Impact Report should be prepared and circulated for public review. This statement is incorrect, as it is clear that there would not be any significant impacts to habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. The project site is currently developed with a truck and trailer repair center with five buildings totaling approximately 10,200 square feet and is surrounded by development. There is no natural vegetation or habitat on or adjacent to the project site. Section 15332(d): Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. Transportation The Trip Generation Assessment prepared for the project determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to traffic (Ganddini Group 2019). Table 1 compares the existing land use trip credit and the proposed project trip generation based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017, and City of Fontana, Truck Trip Generation Study, August 2003. Trip generation for the project was calculated based on Passenger Car Equivalents (PCE) recommended by the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program guidelines. Table 1 shows that the land use trip credit for the existing truck and trailer repair center estimated a total of approximately 242 daily vehicle trips, including 23 vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 32 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. The project is forecast to generate a total of approximately 237 daily PCE trips, including 22 PCE trips during the AM peak hour and 25 PCE trips during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the project would generate five fewer vehicle trips than the existing truck and trailer repair center. Page 673 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 7 March 17, 2020 Table 1 Construction Land Use Table Noise Levels .: Construction Noise Leve LNoise Level Limit Project Trip Generation Project AM Peak PM Peak 61 Daily 2 Industrial 66 NA Daily Actual Land Use Quantity Out Total In Out Total PCE 1L Vehicles Existing Automobile Care Center 10,200 KSF 15 8 23 15 17 34 242 242 Proposed Warehouse 65 8 Residential 59 65 9 Residential 57 65 79.57% Passenger Cars (PCE = 1) Residential 11 3 14 4 11 15 144 144 3.46% 2 -Axle Truck (PCE = 1.5) 103,945 KSF 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 6 4.64% 3 -Axle Truck (PCE = 2.0) 1 0 1 1 1 2 17 9 12.33% 4 -Axle Truck PCE = 3.0 5 1 6 2 5 7 67 22 Warehouse Total 18 4 22 7 18 25 237 181 Difference (Proposed — Existing) +3 -4 -1 -8 +1 -7 -5 -61 SOURCE: Ganddini Group 2019. KSF = thousandsquare feet Noise The Noise Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to noise (RECON 2019a), both during construction and subsequent operation and traffic generation. Construction Noise Table 2 shows that construction noise levels would range from 56 to 65 A -weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level [dB(A) Leq] at the adjacent residential uses. Construction noise levels would not exceed 65 dB(A) Leq. Additionally, construction activities would only occur during the permitted hours specified in the City's Municipal Code. Although the existing adjacent residences would be exposed to construction noise levels that may be heard above ambient conditions, the exposure would be temporary and would occur during the times specified in the City's Municipal Code. Therefore, impacts associated with temporary increases in noise during construction would be less than significant. Receiver Construction Land Use Table Noise Levels .: Construction Noise Leve LNoise Level Limit 1 Residential 61 65 2 Industrial 66 NA 3 Residential 63 65 4 Residential 65 65 5 Residential 65 65 6 Industrial 60 NA 7 Residential 61 65 8 Residential 59 65 9 Residential 57 65 10 Residential 56 65 NA = not applicable; standard applies at residential uses only dB(A) Leq = A -weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level On-site Noise Compatibility The primary noise sources on-site would be truck activity and roof -mounted heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) units. On-site generated noise levels in the city are regulated by Section 17.66.050 of the City's Municipal Code. Table 3 shows that exterior noise levels generated by all on-site noise sources are Page 674 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 8 March 17, 2020 projected to range from 35 to 47 dB(A) Leq at the adjacent properties. Exterior noise levels would not exceed the daytime or nighttime noise level limits of 65 and 60 dB(A) Leq, respectively, at any of the adjacent residential uses. Additionally, assuming a 10 dB exterior to interior noise reduction that would be achieved by residential structures with open windows, interior noise levels at the adjacent residential uses would be reduced to 25 to 37 dB(A) Leq. Interior noise levels would not exceed the daytime or nighttime noise level limits of 50 and 45 dB(A) Leq, respectively, at any of the adjacent residential uses. Therefore, operational on-site generated noise levels would comply with City standards established in Section 17.66.050 of the Municipal Code. Additionally, on-site generated noise levels would not exceed the maximum noise level requirements established in Section 17.66.110 of the Municipal Code. Therefore, impacts associated with on-site generated noise would be less than significant. Receiver & Operational On -Site Land Use Table 3 Generated Noise Levels .: Modeled Noise Level Noise Level Limit 1 (Daytime/Nighttime) 1 Residential 47 65/60 2 Industrial 49 NA 3 Residential 43 65/60 4 Residential 46 65/60 5 Residential 47 65/60 6 Industrial 37 NA 7 Residential 41 65/60 8 Residential 38 65/60 9 Residential 36 65/60 10 Residential 35 65/60 NA = not applicable; standard applies at residential uses only dB(A) Leq = A -weighted decibels one-hour equivalent noise level Traffic Noise Industrial land uses are compatible with transportation -related noise levels up to 75 community noise equivalent level (CNEL). The existing ambient noise level on the project site was measured to be approximately 58 dB(A) Leq. Based on the existing noise environment and the fact that the project would generate less vehicle traffic than the existing use, it is anticipated that future ambient noise levels at the project site due to surrounding transportation -related noise sources would be well less than 75 CNEL, and the project would be compatible with General Plan noise standards. Additionally, because the project would generate less traffic than the existing use, off-site traffic noise impacts to existing uses in the vicinity of the project site are also anticipated to be less than the existing condition. Therefore, traffic -related noise impacts to on-site and off-site uses would be less than significant. Air Quality The Air Quality Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to air quality, including the generation of objectionable odors (RECON 2019b). Air Quality Management Plan The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), who is the air pollution control agency in the South Coast Air Basin, prepared the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP), which outlines the district's strategy for achieving attainment of federal and state Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Page 675 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 9 March 17, 2020 Growth forecasting for the AQMP is based in part on the land uses established by local general plans. As such, if a project is consistent with land use as designated in the local general plan, it can normally be considered consistent with the AQMP. As described in Section 15332(a) above, the project is consistent with the existing General Industrial land use and zoning designations for the project site. Therefore, the emissions associated with the project would be consistent with the growth assumptions in the 2016 AQMP. Another factor used to determine if a project would conflict with implementation of the AQMP is determining if the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of National AAQS (NAAQS) or California AAQS (CAAQS) or interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. NAAQS and CAAQS violations could occur if project emissions would exceed SCAQMD's regional significance thresholds or SCAQMD's Final Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). Tables 4 and 5 show that project emissions during construction and operation would not exceed SCAQMD's regional significance thresholds. Additionally, Tables 6 and 7 show that emissions during construction and operation would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs. Therefore, the project would not obstruct or conflict with implementation of the 2016 AQMP, and impacts would be less than significant. Construction SCAQMD Significance Construction Emissions ROG ComparisonTable 4 Thresholds Emissions(pounds SOx per da PMio PMz.S Demolition 3 34 22 <1 2 2 Site Preparation 4 42 22 <1 11 7 Grading 3 26 17 <1 4 3 Building Construction 2 21 19 <1 2 1 Paving 1 11 13 <1 1 1 Architectural Coatings 9 2 2 <1 <1 <1 Maximum Daily Emissions 9 42 22 <1 11 7 SCA MD Regional Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 ROG = reactive organic gases; NOx = nitrogen oxides; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PMio = particulate matter less than 10 microns; PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns Page 676 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 10 March 17, 2020 of Project (poundsper pr ce Table OperationalSummary . ROG NOx Emissions CO SOx PMio PM2.5 0.06 WINTER <0.01 <0.01 On -Site Truck Emissions 0.37 1.65 Area Sources 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 -Energy Mobile Sources — Passenger Cars <1 <1 3 <1 1 <1 Mobile Sources — Trucks <1 12 3 <1 1 <1 Total 3 12 6 <1 3 1 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No SUMMER Area Sources 2 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy Sources <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Mobile Sources — Passenger Cars <1 <1 3 <1 1 <1 Mobile Sources — Trucks <1 12 3 <1 1 <1 Total 3 12 7 <1 3 1 Significance Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No Table 7 Localized Operational Emissions CO Emissions NOx PMio PM2.5 Area and Energy Sources 0.06 0.06 <0.01 <0.01 On -Site Truck Emissions 0.37 1.65 <0.01 <0.01 Total Maximum Daily On -Site Emission 0.42 1.71 0.01 0.01 LST Threshold 2,193 270 4 2 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase of Any Criteria Pollutant Tables 4 and 5 show that project emissions of ozone precursors (ROG and NOx), PMio, and PM2.5 during construction and operation would be below the SCAQMD's thresholds of significance. These thresholds are designed to provide limits below which project emissions from an individual project would not significantly affect regional air quality or the timely attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in emissions of ozone, PMio, or PM2.5, and impacts would be less than significant. Page 677 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 11 March 17, 2020 Sensitive Receptors The SCAQMD's Final LST Methodology was developed as a tool to assist lead agencies to analyze localized air quality impacts to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project (SCAQMD 2008a). The LST Methodology outlines how to analyze localized impacts from common pollutants of concern including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), CO, PMio, and PM2.5 (which includes diesel particulate matter [DPM]). Localized air quality impacts would occur if pollutant concentrations at sensitive receptors exceeded applicable NAAQS or CAAQS. A sensitive receptor is a person in the population who is more susceptible to health effects due to exposure to an air contaminant than is the population at large. Examples of sensitive receptor locations in the community include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, churches, athletic facilities, retirement homes, and long-term health care facilities. A residential use located approximately 25 meters to the north is the sensitive receptor nearest to the project site. Sensitive receptors located at further distances include additional residential uses north, northeast, and southwest of the project site. During construction activities, the project would result in emissions of DPM from construction equipment exhaust. DPM emissions are included in the PM2.5 emissions calculated with California Emissions Estimator Model. Table 6 shows that project emissions during construction would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs for any criteria pollutants, including PM2.5. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial DPM concentrations. Once operational, on-site emissions would result from truck, area, and energy sources. Table 7 shows that project emissions during operation would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs for any criteria pollutants, including PM2.5. Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during construction or operation of the project, and impacts would be less than significant. Obiectionable Odors Diesel equipment may generate some nuisance odors during construction. Sensitive receptors near the project site include residential uses to the north, northeast, and southwest of the project site. However, exposure to odors associated with project construction would be short term and temporary in nature, and impacts would be less than significant. The following list provides some common types of facilities that are known producers of objectionable odors (Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2010). This list of facilities is not meant to be all-inclusive. • Wastewater Treatment Plant • Wastewater Pumping Facilities • Sanitary Landfill • Transfer Station • Composting Facility • Petroleum Refinery • Asphalt Batch Plant • Chemical Manufacturing • Fiberglass Manufacturing • Painting/Coating Operations • Rendering Plant • Coffee Roaster • Food Processing Facility • Confined Animal Facility/Feed Lot/Dairy • Green Waste and Recycling Operations • Metal Smelting Plants Page 678 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 12 March 17, 2020 The project does not include any of these uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. The project does not propose any uses or activities that would result in potentially significant operational -source odor impacts. Additionally, SCAQMD Rule 402 acts to prevent occurrences of odor nuisances. Therefore, the project is not expected to generate significant objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people, and impacts would be less than significant. Greenhouse Gases The Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by RECON determined that the project would not result in any significant impacts related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (RECON 2019c). Greenhouse Gas Emissions The Greenhouse Gas Analysis calculated the primary sources of direct and indirect GHG emissions for both the existing truck and trailer repair facility and the project. A comparison of these GHG emissions calculations are presented in Table 8. Summary of Existing Source Table 8 and Project GHG (NIT CO2E per year) Existing Truck and Trailer Re air Center Emissions Pro'e Difference Mobile 142 903 761 Ener Source 56 90 34 Area Sources <1 <1 <1 Water/Wastewater Sources 7 106 99 Solid Waste Sources 20 49 30 Construction (Amortized over 30 ears) -- 15 15 TOTAL 225 1,163 938 MT CO2E = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Table 8 shows that the project would result in a total of 1,163 MT CO2E) per year, which constitutes a net increase of 938 MT CO2E per year over the existing condition. As discussed in Section 4.1 of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the City has not adopted its own GHG Thresholds of Significance for CEQA. Therefore, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis evaluated potential impacts based on screening levels recommended in the Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans, which identify the applicable SCAQMD screening level for industrial uses as 10,000 MT CO2E (SCAQMD 2008b). As shown in Table 8, project GHG emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses. Therefore, the project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. Conflict with Applicable Plans The City has adopted the Sustainable Community Action Plan, which contains policies and actions to reduce GHG emissions in the City 15 percent below 2008 levels by 2020. However, the City has not adopted its own GHG emissions thresholds of significance for CEQA. As described above, project GHG emissions would be less than the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses. As discussed in Section 4.1 of the Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the project would achieve consistency with the City's Sustainable Community Action through compliance and adherence to local regulations. Therefore, the project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emission of GHGs, and impacts would be less than significant. Page 679 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 13 March 17, 2020 Water Quality The project would prevent water quality impacts during construction by implementing best management practices (BMPs) consistent with the regulatory requirements of the City and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MS4 Permit). Example construction BMPs include perimeter silt fences, designated and contained storage areas for materials and waste, and on-site materials for spill control or containment. Implementation of BMPs during construction would minimize potential impacts to water quality. As part of the project, the contractor will monitor the water quality BMPs, including conducting routine inspections of disturbed areas to ensure the BMPs remain intact and effective. The project site's permanent drainage plan would be prepared by a registered civil engineer to safely retain, detain, and/or convey storm water runoff to the existing storm drain system. Furthermore, the project is located within a fully urbanized area of the city and is not located near a watercourse. Therefore, impacts related to water quality and runoff would be less than significant. 8. The comment states that the project may not rely on a Categorical Exemption because the project may have significant impacts related to air quality. This statement is incorrect. The air quality analysis conducted for the proposed project concluded the project would not result in any significant impacts to air quality. 9. The comment states that potential health risks associated with the proposed project were not evaluated and that a construction or operational health risk assessment (HRA) was not prepared. The air quality analysis prepared for the project provides an analysis of potential air quality impacts, including the use of screening criteria to determine if an HRA with detailed dispersion modeling were necessary. A screening level analysis is appropriate to assess whether more a detailed and refined dispersion modeling assessment is needed. Screening models rely on very conservative assumption to check if a project could cause a significant health impact. If, based on the screening, there is no potential for a significant impact, then no additional analysis is required. The use of screening models is consistent with industry standard and SCAQMD guidance. Because the results of the air quality analysis, including the use of screening criteria, found potential project emissions to be within those anticipated within the City for normal development and operations, an HRA was determined to be unnecessary. Further, the Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) analysis of health risk impacts was not performed in accordance with SCAQMD LST methodology and Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) guidance. SWAPE relied on their California Emissions Estimator Model calculations, which did not include the most accurate project level detail. Additionally, SWAPE incorrectly used the combination of both on-site and off-site emissions (regional emissions) to represent on-site emissions (localized emissions), resulting in higher construction and operational emission rates than would actually occur on-site. The SWAPE analysis misrepresents potential impacts associated with the project. 10. The comment states that it was not demonstrated that the project would result in less than significant GHG impacts. The GHG Analysis prepared for the project has identified a significance threshold of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial projects. This screening level threshold is from the SCAQMD Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. This Guidance Document provides substantial evidence supporting the approaches to significance of GHG emissions that can be considered by the lead agency in adopting its own threshold. The City has not adopted its own GHG Thresholds of Significance for CEQA. Therefore, GHG impacts were evaluated using this Guidance Document. This screening level is intended to exempt projects that are too small to have significant impacts from further analysis. As demonstrated in the GHG Analysis and summarized in Table 8, the project would result in a net increase of 938 MT CO2E per year, which is well less than the 10,000 MT CO2E screening level. Since emissions would not exceed the screening level threshold, project emissions would not need to be compared to the 2035 SCAQMD efficiency target. Page 680 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 14 March 17, 2020 11. Lozeau states that the project may have significant cumulative impacts. Specifically, air quality impacts associated with construction equipment, diesel trucks, and other vehicles associated with the project. This statement is incorrect. The air quality analysis prepared for the project provides an assessment of potential cumulative air quality impacts. The SCAQMD shares the responsibility with California Air Resources Board for ensuring that all federal and state ambient air quality standards are achieved and maintained throughout the air basin. The SCAQMD has developed methodologies and thresholds of significance that are widely used throughout the air basin. SCAQMD staff has suggested in the cumulative significance methodologies contained in the CEQA Air Quality Handbook that the emissions -based thresholds be used to determine if a project's contribution to regional cumulative emissions is cumulatively considerable. These thresholds were used in the Air Quality Analysis to assess the significance of the project -specific and cumulative air quality impacts. Air quality impacts are basin -wide, and air quality is affected by all pollutant sources in the basin. Therefore, the ambient air quality measurements provided in the Air Quality Analysis provide a summary of basin -wide cumulative air quality impacts. As the individual project thresholds are designed to help achieve attainment with cumulative basin -wide standards, they are also appropriate for assessing the project's contribution to cumulative impacts. Refer to the construction and operational emissions summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Furthermore, it should be noted that the project would replace an existing truck and trailer repair center. As detailed in the Trip Generation Assessment prepared for the project (Ganddini Group 2019) and summarized in Table 1, the existing facility generates more traffic than the project would under both daily PCE and actual vehicle scenarios. The Trip Generation Assessment conservatively did not apply PCE rates to the existing facility's truck traffic. Because the project would generate fewer trips than the existing facility, vehicle criteria pollutant emissions associated with the project would be less than what currently exists. Due to the varied locations and schedules for construction of other projects in the city, it is unlikely construction activities would overlap, thereby avoiding significant cumulative construction air quality impacts on sensitive receptors. Furthermore, the project would be constructed in accordance with the 2019 Energy Code, which became effective January 1, 2020. For non-residential buildings, it is estimated that the 2019 standards will decrease energy consumption by 30 percent compared to the previous 2016 Energy Code (California Energy Commission 2018). Therefore, emissions associated with energy consumption would be less than the current baseline. 12. Lozeau restates their conclusion that the CE should not be filed and that an Environmental Impact Report should be prepared for the proposed project. As shown in response to comments 2 through 11 above, the project does qualify under a Class 32 Categorical Exemption (CE) for infill development projects. Responses to Exhibit A Al. This is an introduction to the letter that claims that the project's air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts were not adequately evaluated and that the project does not qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption. This statement is incorrect. As shown in responses 2 through 11 above, the project's air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts were adequately evaluated. The introduction states that SWAPE has prepared their own analysis of the project's air quality, health risk, and GHG impacts. A2. The comment restates the claim that the project does not qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption. Refer to responses 1 through 12. The comment incorrectly states that quantified analysis of air quality, health risk, noise, or water quality impacts resulting from project during construction and operation was not provided. This claim is not factual. A Trip Generation Assessment (Ganddini Group 2019), Noise Analysis (RECON 2019a), Air Quality Analysis (RECON 2019b), and Greenhouse Gas Analysis (RECON 2019c) that quantify project impacts have been prepared. The project would also implement BMPs consistent with the regulatory requirements of the City and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (MS4 Permit) to avoid water quality impacts. Refer to the summary of the analyses above. RECON has reviewed the analysis prepared by SWAPE, and offers the following responses. Page 681 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 15 March 17, 2020 A3. The comment incorrectly states that no health risk assessment was prepared for construction and operation of the project. The health risks associated with construction and operation of the project are addressed in the Air Quality Analysis prepared for the project and summarized above. The comment refers to the current version of OEHHA's Air Toxics Hot Spot Program Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments dated February 2015 and adopted March 2015. This guidance document was developed by OEHHA, in conjunction with the California Air Resources Board (CARB), for use in implementing the Air Toxics "Hot Spots" Program (Health and Safety Code Section 44360 et. seq.). The Air Toxics "Hot Spot" Program requires stationary sources to report types and quantities of certain substances routinely released into the air. The goals are to collect emission data, identify facilities having localized impacts, ascertain health risks, notify nearby residents of significant risks, and reduce those significant risks to acceptable levels. Section 8.2.10 of this guidance document addresses cancer risk evaluation of short-term projects. This section states: "The local air pollution control districts sometimes use the risk assessment guidelines for the Hot Spots program in permitting decisions for short-term projects such as construction or waste site remediation." Short-term projects that would require a permitting decision by SCAQMD typically would be limited to site remediation and would not be applicable to the project. The guidance document does not provide specific recommendations for evaluation of heavy-duty diesel construction equipment. Additionally, SCAQMD has not developed any recommendations on its use for CEQA analyses for potential construction impacts. As discussed in Response 9 above, a screening level analysis is appropriate to assess whether a more detailed and refined dispersion modeling assessment is needed. Screening models rely on very conservative assumption to check if a project could cause a significant health impact. If, based on the screening, there is no potential for a significant impact, then no additional analysis is required. The use of screening models is consistent with industry standard and SCAQMD guidance. Because the results of the air quality analysis, including the use of screening criteria, found potential project emissions to be within those anticipated within the City for normal development and operations, an HRA was determined to be unnecessary. The comment also incorrectly states that the project documents fail to disclose the anticipated duration of construction. The anticipated duration of construction phases are shown in Table 4 of the Air Quality Analysis and are as follows: • Demolition: 20 day • Site Preparation: 5 days • Grading: 8 days • Building Construction/Architectural Coatings: 230 days • Paving: 18 days A4. The comment correctly assumes that the project will operate for at least 30 years, but incorrectly states that no HRA was prepared for operation of the project. An assessment of on-site operational emissions was conducted. As with construction emissions, a screening analysis was performed for operational emissions and determined that detailed HRA dispersion modeling was not required. Further, the SCAQMD published and adopted a Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning, which recommends that HRAs be conducted for substantial sources of DPM (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities that generate more than 100 trucks per day or more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units). Based on the Trip Generation Assessment prepared for the project (Ganddini Group 2019), the project would generate 93 passenger car equivalent (PCE) truck trips, which is a metric used to assess traffic -flow rates. Based on the PCE rates shown in the Trip Generation Assessment, this is equivalent to 37 actual trucks per day. Based on the SCAQMD guidance, a detailed HRA would not be required for the project. A5. The comment states that a comparison of the excess health risk to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of ten in one million was not conducted and, therefore, a less than significant impact determination cannot be reached without quantifying emissions to compare to the proper threshold. Refer to responses A3 and A4. The screening level analysis prepared for construction and operation of the project was Page 682 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 16 March 17, 2020 appropriate for determining impacts, and a detailed HRA analysis and dispersion modeling is not warranted. A6. The comment states that SWAPE has used AERSCREEN to conduct a screening -level analysis of the project. A screening level analysis was prepared for the project using SCAQMD LST methodology; thus, use of the AERSCREEN model was not required. However, we acknowledge the AERSCREEN is an appropriate tool that can be used when a more detailed analysis is required. AT The comment states that CalEEMod was used to model the project and summarizes the assumptions that SWAPE used in their AERSCREEN analysis. The SWAPE analysis and related technical appendices were carefully reviewed. Based on this evaluation, multiple methodologies are flawed. The inputs used in their analysis were speculative and do not accurately represent the project. The inaccurate CalEEMod inputs summarized in this comment include: • The land use assumptions that SWAPE used in CalEEMod are incorrect. Half of the warehouse was modeled as "refrigerated no -rail" and half of the warehouse was modeled as "unrefrigerated no -rail. The project would not include refrigerated warehouse space. The trip generation the SWAPE modeled in CalEEMod is incorrect. SWAPE modeled 237 daily trips. This is an overestimate of the actual number of trips generated for the project, as the 237 daily trips figure includes passenger car equivalency (PCE) factors for trucks. As shown in Table 1, the project would generate 181 actual daily trips (144 passenger cars and 37 trucks). The vehicle mix modeled in CalEEMod was also not modified to represent the correct passenger car and truck mix, resulting in inaccurate vehicle emission calculations. • The comment states that all other values were left as defaults in CalEEMod. The inputs used in CalEEMod should be modified as needed to accurately represent project conditions. Using CalEEMod and the inaccurate project inputs, it was calculated that the project would generate 284 pounds of DPM during construction. It appears that this number was obtained by converting the year 2020 PM10 exhaust emissions from tons per year to pounds. First, this is not accurate, as the specific project inputs, including site acreage, were not included in CalEEMod. Additionally, it assumes that the maximum peak daily emissions from each construction year would occur for the entire construction phase. This assumption overestimates average construction emissions over the entire construction duration. SWAPE also incorrectly used the combination of both on-site and off-site emissions (regional emissions) to represent on-site emissions (localized emissions). This assumption is the equivalent of having all diesel delivery and haul trucks that would actually travel regionally to and from the project site (up to 20 miles) exclusively on the project site. Finally, while the equation shown to convert the emission rate to grams per second is correct, because 284 pounds of DPM is not accurate for the reasons stated, the emission rate of 0.00357 g/s is also not accurate. We note that the statement that residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life is correct and consistent with OEHHA guidance. A8. The comment states that the modeled 418 -day construction duration was subtracted from the total residential duration of 30 years to come up with an operational exposure duration of 28.85 years. However, the analysis holds the emission factor (which was calculated for buildout year 2022) constant for the lifetime of the project. Thus, potential impacts would be overstated because it excludes improvements in the vehicle fleet mix and cleaner truck fleets as a result of state mandates over time. Additionally, as was done with construction emissions, SWAPE incorrectly used the combination of both on-site and off-site emissions (regional emissions) to represent on-site emissions (localized emissions). This assumption is the equivalent of having all employee and truck trips generated by the project exclusively on the project site; thus, greatly overestimating actual on-site DPM emissions. Finally, while the equation shown to convert the emission rate Page 683 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 17 March 17, 2020 to grams per second is correct, because 27.8 pounds of DPM is not accurate for the reasons stated, the emission rate of 0.0004 g/s is also not accurate. A9. The comment states that the project was modeled using AERSCREEN as an area source with a release height of 3 meters and initial vertical dimension of 1.5 meters. The use of a rectangular area source with a release height of 3 meters to represent construction and operational activities does not adequately represent the project site, does not account for complex terrain conditions, and likely overstates emissions because of the plume interaction with terrain. Additionally, SCAQMD recommends modeling a volume source rather than an area source for modeling construction equipment and diesel truck exhaust emissions. SCAQMD also recommended a 5 meter release height. Further, the analysis assumes worst-case conditions occur 24 hours per day, 365 days per year, for the entire construction duration along with maximum daily emissions occurring each of those days. Therefore, the modeled concentrations are an overestimation and do not accurately represent project conditions. A10. SWAPE calculated the annualized average concentration by multiplying the single -hour concentration by 10 percent. Rather, an average of 0.08 is recommended in OEHHA guidance. Thus, the calculated annual average concentration is also overestimated. All. Using the overestimated annualized average concentration, SWAPE used OEHHA methodology to calculate potential cancer risk. However, because the emissions calculated by SWAPE were overestimated and because incorrect methodology and assumptions were used, the calculated excess cancer risks are also overestimated and inaccurate. If the SWAPE analysis accounted for the guidance and data discussed above, then the results would have been much less and below the significance threshold. Al2. The comment states that the cumulative impacts resulting from nearby industrial land uses were not evaluated. The comment identifies a number of nearby industrial facilities that are existing and currently operating. Refer to response All above. The SCAQMD maintains 41 active air quality monitoring sites located throughout the South Coast Air Basin. Air pollutant concentrations and meteorological information are continuously recorded at these stations. As discussed in response All, air quality impacts are basin - wide, and air quality is affected by all pollutant sources in the basin. Therefore, the ambient air quality measurements provided in the Air Quality Analysis provide a summary of basin -wide cumulative air quality impacts. Because the industrial facilities identified in the comment are existing facilities with existing operational emissions, emissions from these facilities already contribute to the existing ambient air quality within the South Coast Air Basin, and emissions associated with these existing facilities are monitored at the air quality monitoring sites. As the individual project thresholds are designed to help achieve attainment with cumulative basin -wide standards, they are also appropriate for assessing the project's contribution to cumulative impacts. A13. This comment restates that it was not demonstrated that the project would result in less than significant air quality and health risk impacts. This statement is incorrect and is refuted by the responses to comments presented above. Additionally, a project -specific Greenhouse Gas Analysis (RECON 2019c) that quantifies the project's GHG impacts has been prepared. The comment also states that SWAPE has performed a GHG screening level analysis. RECON has reviewed the analysis prepared by SWAPE, and offers the following responses. A14. SWAPE calculated that the project would result in approximately 474.5 MT CO2E from construction and 1,374.29 MT CO2E annually from operation. For the reasons outlined in response A7, these emission calculations are inaccurate. Additionally, the SWAPE analysis does not account for existing GHG emissions associated with the existing truck and trailer repair center. Because this use would be demolished, GHG emissions associated with the existing use would no longer occur. Thus, the GHG analysis should identify the net increase in GHG emissions. As calculated in the Greenhouse Gas Analysis (RECON 2019c) and summarized in Table 8 above, the project would result in a net increase of approximately 938 MT CO2E per year. Page 684 Mr. Tabe Van der Zwaag Page 18 March 17, 2020 As discussed in response 10 above, since emissions would not exceed the screening level threshold, project emissions would not need to be compared to the 2035 SCAQMD efficiency target. Even if an efficiency threshold analysis was required, SWAPE's calculation of the project's service population is speculative. SWAPE used the median employment density value of 2,616 square feet per employee for San Bernardino from the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG's) Employment Density Study Summary Report to calculate that the project would include 40 employees. SCAG's report provides median and average employment density data using two different datasets. For San Bernardino, the employment densities reported in SCAG's report range from 1,179 to 2,616 square feet per employee for warehouses. Using these values, the project's service population would range from 40 to 88 employees. Thus, SWAPE's calculations are inaccurate and speculative. A15. Comment noted. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 619-308-9333 x144 or by e-mail at nlarkin@reconenvironmental.com. Sincerely, Nick Larkin Senior Project Manager NHL:jg References Cited Bay Area Air Quality Management District 2010 California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. May. California Energy Commission (CEC) 2018 An Overview of the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. Accessed at 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards. March 2018. Ganddini Group 2019 8545 Pecan Avenue Project Trip Generation Assessment. 19-0169. Prepared for Xebec Holdings, LLC. August 8. RECON Environmental, Inc. (RECON) 2019a Noise Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project. Rancho Cucamonga, California. August 16. 2019b Air Quality Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project. Rancho Cucamonga, California. August 14. 2019c Greenhouse Gas Analysis for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project. Rancho Cucamonga, California. August 21. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2008a Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. July. 2008b Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA GHG Significance Thresholds for Stationary Sources, Rules, and Plans. October. Page 685 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 686 RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0229-171-02. A. Recitals. 1. Shean Kim, on behalf of Xebec Realty, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2019-00590 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 20-15 approving the application and making findings in support of its decision. 3. On February 20, 2020, Lozeau Drury, LLP ("Appellant"), filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving the application. 4. On March 18, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and continued said hearing to its regular meeting of April 15, 2020. 5. On April 15, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reopened the public hearing regarding this appeal, conducted the public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on April 15, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property generally located on the east side of Pecan Avenue, south of Arrow Route; and Page 687 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 Page 2 b. The subject property is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage and maintenance yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical forwarehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis forthe building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Trucking Storage and Maintenance Facility General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District North Industrial Building, Single- Family Residences General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District East Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial GI District West Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical forwarehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis forthe building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is requires 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback Side 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback Rear 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes *35 Feet at Minimum Setback (1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback) f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is requires 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 Page 3 3. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In - Fill Development Projects. In approving the application, the Planning Commission specifically concurred with the staff determination that the application is exempt from CEQA. The basis of the Appellant's appeal is that the Planning Commission erred in approving the application in reliance on the Class 32 exemption without conducting further environmental review. For the foregoing reasons, and based upon its independent judgment and all available evidence in the record and Page 689 Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Office Parking 8,000 SF 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces Warehouse Parking 1:1,000 for 1 sl 20,000 SF (95,945 SF) 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking 10 Dock High Doors 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 3. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In - Fill Development Projects. In approving the application, the Planning Commission specifically concurred with the staff determination that the application is exempt from CEQA. The basis of the Appellant's appeal is that the Planning Commission erred in approving the application in reliance on the Class 32 exemption without conducting further environmental review. For the foregoing reasons, and based upon its independent judgment and all available evidence in the record and Page 689 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 Page 4 presented to this Council, the City Council finds that the application was properly exempt From CEQA pursuant to the Class 32 exemption and denies the appeal. a. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is a permitted use and complies with the development standards for the Industrial Park (IP) General Plan land use designation and zoning district, where the project site is located. This includes compatibility with the setback, height, lot coverage, and other design standards as described above. No variance was required for this Project. b. The proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The site is 4.77 acres in size, and thus lower than the five -acre threshold. Furthermore, the surrounding properties are all fully developed with urban uses, including residential and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties as described above. Thus, the project site is surrounded by urban uses on all sides. C. The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (WRA; August 2019) was prepared for the project site. The project site does not include any natural habitats and is surrounded by development. The BRA determined that the project site does not contain drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands or riparian habitats that would be under the jurisdiction of federal, state or local agencies. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. i. Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Ganddini Group; August 8, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The project site is presently being used by a truck repair and storage operation which generates an estimated 242 daily vehicle trips. The proposed warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 237 daily trips or a 5 -trip reduction from current conditions Based on the reduction in daily trips, it was determined that the project was below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis and therefore no significant traffic impact is created by the project. ii. Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Recon; August 16, 2019) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds. iii. Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analyses (Recon: August 21, 2019) were prepared for the project. The analyses determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases. Therefore, the project does not cause a significant impact relating to air quality or greenhouse gases. Page 690 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 Page 5 iv. Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (CA Engineering, Inc.; November 5, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. f. The City Council finds that the project does not involve an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Based on the foregoing studies and other evidence in the record, the City Council finds that the project will not result in a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, the City Council finds that the project itself does not involve any unusual circumstances. The project site is currently occupied by an industrial use on land designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan and the City's Zoning Map. The current use is a storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm, and the site contains multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. Thus, there is little change in the nature of the current facility and the project being frequented by trucks. In addition, the project is similar in nature and size to the surrounding industrial uses and warehouses. The enclosed warehouses will improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood and reduce on-site noise compared to the outdoor trucking facility currently occupying the site. g. The City Council finds that the project will not result in a cumulatively significant air quality impact due to successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. The City Council concurs with the staff finding that air quality impacts will remain the same, if not improve, due to the fact that industrial facilities already exist in the immediate area. i. The project would replace an existing storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm. The Project's Trip Generation Analysis prepared by the Ganddini Group concluded that the existing trucking facility actually generates more traffic than the Project is expected to generate. Therefore, a reduction in vehicle criteria pollutant emissions below what is currently generated should be expected. Furthermore, the project would be constructed in accordance with the 2019 Energy Code. For non-residential buildings, it is estimated that the 2019 standards will decrease energy consumption by 30 percent compared to the previous 2016 Energy Code. This should help reduce pollutant emissions below the current baseline and avoid any cumulative air quality impact. ii. Varied locations and schedules for construction of other projects in the City render it unlikely construction activities would overlap, thereby avoiding significant cumulative construction air quality impacts on sensitive receptors. iii. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Recon determined that the project would not cause a significant air quality impact associated with construction equipment, diesel trucks, and other vehicles associated with the Project. The thresholds utilized in this analysis were developed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These thresholds are used to determine whether a Project contributes to a significant cumulative impact because they review projects on a basin -wide level. Given that no significant air quality impact was found, the Class 32 exemption is appropriate. 5. Based upon the findings, evidence, and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and Page 691 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 20 -XX DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 Page 6 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2020- 00076 and upholds the Planning Commission's decision to approve Design Review DRC2019- 00590. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on April 15, 2020. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Page 692 4/15/2020 City Council Meeting: Item J3. I Additional Correspondence 7— D T 510.836.4200 1939 Harrison Street, Ste. 150 www.lozeaudrury.com P 510.836.4205 Oakland, CA 94612 richard@lozeaudrury.com BY E-MAIL April 10, 2020 Mayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Member Hutchison Council Member Scott Council Member Spagnolo City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 council(a),cityofrc.us Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Tabe.vanderZwaag(a,cityofrc.us Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 City. Clerk(&,,CityofRC.us Re: Design Review No. DRC2019-00590: Objection to CEQA Exemption Dear Mayor Michael, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, Honorable Council Members, Mr. van der Zwaag, and Ms. Reynolds: I am writing on behalf of the Supporters Alliance for Environmental Responsibility ("SAFER") and its members living and/or working in or around the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") regarding the Xebec Realty warehouse distribution project, Design Review No. 2019- 00590, proposed for the parcel on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route, APN 0229-171-02 ("Project"). SAFER objects to the City's proposed Class 32 exemption from review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). SAFER believes that the proposed Project is not exempt from CEQA review and that CEQA review is required to analyze and mitigate the Project's environmental impacts, including impacts on air quality, health risk, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Shean Kim for Xebec Realty, is requesting that the Planning Commission review and approve a proposed concrete tilt -up warehouse distribution building approximately 103,945 square feet. The warehouse includes a 95,945 square foot warehouse area, 4,000 square feet of office space on the main floor, and 4,000 square feet of office space within the mezzanine. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 2 of 15 The loading area, 10 dock doors and trailer parking stalls will be located on the east side of the building. The Project will also include 32 parking spaces for office parking and 47 spaces for warehouse parking. The project site is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue just south of Arrow Route. (APN: 0229-171-02). The project site has a General Plan land use designation of General Industrial (GI). The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in -fill" project (Class 32). II. LEGAL STANDARD CEQA mandates that "the long-term protection of the environment ... shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions" throughout California. PRC § 21001(d). A "project" is "the whole of an action" directly undertaken, supported, or authorized by a public agency "which may cause either a direct physical change in the environment, or a reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment." PRC § 21065; CEQA Guidelines, 14 CCR § 15378(a). For this reason, CEQA is concerned with an action's ultimate "impact on the environment." Bozung v. LAFCO (1975) 13 Ca1.3d 263, 283. CEQA requires environmental factors to be considered at the "earliest possible stage ... before [the project] gains irreversible momentum," Id. 13 Ca1.3d at 277, "at a point in the planning process where genuine flexibility remains." Sundstrom v. Mendocino County (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 307. To achieve its objectives of environmental protection, CEQA has a three -tiered structure. 14 CCR § 15002(k); Committee to Save the Hollywoodland Specific Plan v. City of Los Angeles (2008) 161 Cal.AppAth 1168, 1185-86 ("Hollywoodland'). First, if a project falls into an exempt category, or it can be seen with certainty that the activity in question will not have a significant effect on the environment, no further agency evaluation is required. Id. Second, if there is a possibility the project will have a significant effect on the environment, the agency must perform an initial threshold study. Id.; 14 CCR § 15063(a). If the study indicates that there is no substantial evidence that the project or any of its aspects may cause a significant effect on the environment the agency may issue a negative declaration. Id., 14 CCR §§ 15063(b)(2), 15070. Finally, if the project will have a significant effect on the environment, an environmental impact report (`BIR") is required. Id. Here, since the City exempted the Project from CEQA entirely, we are at the first step of the CEQA process. 1. CEQA Exemptions. CEQA identifies certain classes of projects which are exempt from the provisions of CEQA. These are called categorical exemptions. 14 CCR §§ 15300, 15354. "Exemptions to CEQA DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 3 of 15 are narrowly construed and "` [e]xemption categories are not to be expanded beyond the reasonable scope of their statutory language."' Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 CalAth 105, 125. The determination as to the appropriate scope of a categorical exemption is a question of law subject to independent, or de novo, review. San Lorenzo Valley Community Advocates for Responsible Education v. San Lorenzo Valley Unified School Dist., (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 1356, 1375 ("[Q]uestions of interpretation or application of the requirements of CEQA are matters of law. (Citations.) Thus, for example, interpreting the scope of a CEQA exemption presents `a question of law, subject to de novo review by this court.' (Citations)." The City asserts the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA as an "in -fill" project (Class 32). 2. Exceptions to CEQA Exemptions. There are several exceptions to the categorical exemptions. 14 CCR § 15300.2. At least two exceptions are relevant here: (1) Significant Effects. A project may never be exempted from CEQA if there is a "fair argument" that the project may have significant environmental impacts due to "unusual circumstances." 14 CCR § 15300.2(c). The Supreme Court has held that since the agency may only exempt activities that do not have a significant effect on the environment, a fair argument that a project will have significant effects precludes an exemption. Wildlife Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 204. (2) Cumulative Impacts. A project may not be exempted from CEQA review "when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant." 3. Limitations to In -Fill Exemption. The Class 32 In -Fill exemption can only be applied when "[t]he project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species" or where "[a]pproval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality." 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15332(c), (d). The CEQA analysis fails to properly analyze and mitigate impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas, and other impacts. The analysis should be withdrawn, an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 4 of 15 III. ANALYSIS CEQA and its regulations provide that certain projects may be exempt. However, "[a]n activity that may have a significant effect on the environment cannot be categorically exempt." Salmon Protectors v. County of Marin (2004) 125 Cal.AppAth 1098, 1107; Azusa Land Reclamation v. Main San Gabriel Basin (1997) 52 Cal.AppAth 1165, 1191, 1202. CEQA's unique "fair argument" standard applies when reviewing a CEQA exemption. Under the "fair argument" standard, an agency is precluded from relying on a categorical exemption when there is a fair argument that a project will have a significant effect on the environment. Banker's Hill, Hillcrest, Park West Community Preservation Group v. City of San Diego ("Bankers Hill") (2006) 139 Cal. App. 4th 249, 266. In other words, "where there is any reasonable possibility that a project or activity may have a significant effect on the environment, an exemption would be improper." Id.; Dunn -Edwards Corp., 9 Cal.AppAth at 654-655. Here, there is substantial evidence of a fair argument that the Project will have significant air quality impacts, precluding reliance on the categorical exemption. Even if the substantial evidence applies for this categorical exemption, our expert evidence shows that the City's Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analyses lack substantial evidence to determine that the Project's air quality and GHG impacts are less than significant, and the City therefore cannot rely on the categorical exemption. Environmental consulting firm SWAPE commented on the Project based on their review of the documents provided prior to the Planning Commission meeting held on February 12, 2020. Since that Planning Commission meeting, we received additional documents from the City on the Project, including Recon's August 2019 Air Quality Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, the Ganddini Group's August 2019 Trip Generation Assessment, and Recon's February 12, 2020 response to our comments dated February 11, 2020. SWAPE reviewed these additional documents and updated their comments on the Project and its impacts. 1. The City Relies on Unsubstantiated Input Parameters to Estimate Project Emissions and Thus Fails to Provide Substantial Evidence of the Project's Air Quality Impacts. Recon's Air Quality Analysis relies on emissions calculated from the California Emissions Estimator Model Version CalEEMod.2016.3.2 ("CaIEEMod"). This model relies on recommended default values based on site-specific information related to a number of factors. This model is used to generate a project's construction and operational emissions. SWAPE reviewed the Project's CaIEEMod output files and found that the values input into the model were inconsistent with information provided in the Project's documents. This results in an underestimation of the Project's emissions. As a result, the City fails to provide substantial evidence that the Project will not have significant air quality impacts and an EIR is required to properly analyze these potential impacts. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 5 of 15 a. The City's air quality analysis failed to model all proposed land uses. According to the Decenter 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda ("DR"), the Project would include 79 parking spaces. DR, p. 2. However, review of the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrates that no parking was included in the model. See August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 32, 59, 86, 113; Ex. A, p. 3. This presents an issue because the land use type of size features are used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that go into the model's calculations. Ex. A, p. 3. The square footage of a land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted and volume that is heated or cooled. Id. Therefore, by failing to include the proposed parking land use, the model underestimates the Project's construction and operational emissions. b. The City's air quality analysis failed to consider cold -storage requirements. The Project's CalEEMod model incorrectly assumes that the proposed warehouse will be exclusively unrefrigerated, and as a result, the Project's emissions may be underestimated. The DR and associated documents fail to provide any indication that the future tenants of the proposed warehouse are known at this time. Ex. A, p. 3. However, as discussed by the SCAQMD, "CEQA requires the use of `conservative analysis' to afford `fullest protection of the environment."' See "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation, SCAQMD Inland Empire Logistics Council, June 2014, available at: hgp://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/cega/handbook/hi gh-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc_6- 19-2014.pdVsfvrsn=2. In order to conduct the most conservative analysis, the warehouse building should have been modeled as refrigerated space in order to account for the additional emissions that refrigeration requirements may generate. Ex. A, p. 3.However, the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrate that the model assumed that the proposed warehouse will be exclusively unrefrigerated. See August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 32, 59, 86, 113; Ex. A, p. 3. Refrigerated warehouses release more air pollutants and GHG emissions when compared to unrefrigerated warehouses for several reasons. Ex. A, p. 3. First, warehouses with cold storage are known to consume more energy compared to those without cold storage. Id., pp. 3-4. Second, warehouses equipped with cold storage typically require refrigerated trucks, which are known to idle for much longer when compared to unrefrigerated hauling trucks. Id., p. 4. Third, according to a July 2014 Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage presentation prepared by the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD"), it was found that hauling trucks that require refrigeration result in greater truck trip rates when compared to non -refrigerated hauling trucks. "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/cega/handbook/hi gh-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality- analysis/finaltrucktripstudyMsc072514.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 7, 9; see Ex. A, p. 4. Therefore, by DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 6of15 modeling the Project's emissions without refrigerated warehouses, the August 2019 Air Quality Analysis may underestimate the Project's operational emissions and an EIR should therefore be prepared to account for the potential refrigerated warehouse needs by future tenants. Ex. A, p. 4. c. The City's air quality analysis used an incorrect construction schedule. According to the August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, the building construction and architectural coating phases are planned to overlap and last 230 days. See August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, p. 16, Table 4; Ex. A, p. 4. However, the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrate that the building construction and architectural coating phases were modeled separately, with the building construction lasting 230 days and the architectural coating lasting 115 days that do not overlap. August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 37, 64, 91, 118; Ex. A, p. 4. The model is inconsistent with the construction schedule provided in the August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, and may underestimate the Project's maximum daily emissions by spreading emissions resulting from the building construction and architectural coating over a larger amount of time, as well as assuming the phases will not overlap. Ex. A, p. 4. d. The City's air quality analysis incorrectly relies on the Fontana Truck Trip Study. According to SWAPE, the Project's air modeling and Trip Generation Assessment rely on incorrect fleet mix percentages, and as a result, the Project's mobile -related operational emissions may be underestimated. Ex. A, p. 4. According to the City's February 2020 Response to Comments, "the proposed trip generation [is] based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation manual, 10th Edition, 2017, and City of Fontana, Truck Trip Generation Study, August 2003." February 2020 Response to Comments, p. 5. However, the SCAQMD has determined that the Fontana Study has limited applicability to warehouse projects, and therefore the Fontana Study should not be relied on to determine the Project's mobile -source emissions. See "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation, SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http://www.agmd. gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study- for-air-quality-analysis/finaltrucktripstudymsc072514.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 10; Ex. A, p. 5. SCAQMD staff found the following issues with the Fontana Truck Trip Generation Study: The overall trip rate is based on only four warehouses total, which includes two warehouses with zeros. In other words, the results of the Fontana Study were based on only two data points. As is disclosed in the Fontana Study, the daily trip rate was only cased on data from a Target warehouse and a TAB warehouse. See "Truck Trip Generation Study," City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/622, p. 35; Ex. A, p. 5. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 7of15 • The Fontana Study does not report any 24-hour daily truck trip rates. According to the Fontana Study, "Trip generation statistics for daily truck trips were not calculated because vehicle classifications counts could not be obtained from the driveway 24-hour counts." See "Truck Trip Generation Study," City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/622, p. 6; Ex. A, p. 5. • The trip rates using the Fontana Study are calculated based on a 20 percent truck fleet mix, which is inconsistent with SCAMWD's recommendation that agencies use a truck fleet mix of 40 percent. See "CaIEEMod User's Guide, Appendix E." CAPCOA, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/caleemod-gppendixg.pdf, pp. 15; Ex. A, p. 5. The City's February 2020 Response to Comments claims that the Trip Generation Assessment utilizes the following fleet mix: 79.57 percent passenger cars, 3.46 percent 2 -axle trucks, 4.64 percent 3 -axle trucks, and 12.33 percent 4 -axle trucks. February 2020 Response to Comments, p.5, Table 1. Further, according to the August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, the Project is estimated to generate 181 daily trips, including 37 truck trips, and review of the Project's CaIEEMod output files demonstrates that the truck model calculated a default value of 37 daily truck trips. August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 17, 54, 135; Ex. A, p. 5. The remaining 144 trips were included in the autos model. August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 81, 108; Ex. A, p. 5. Approximately 20 percent of the total daily trips were modeled as truck trips. Ex. A, p. 6. However, this fleet mix is not consistent with recommendations set forth by SCAQMD and does not accurately represent the percentage of trucks that are expected to access the site on a daily basis. Id. Rather, SCAQMD recommends that lead agencies assume a truck fleet mix of 40 percent. See "CaIEEMod User's Guide, Appendix E." CAPCOA, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/caleemod-gppendixe.pdf, p. 15; Ex. A, p. 6. According to Appendix E: Technical Source Documentation of the 2013 CaIEEMod User's Guide, "in order to avoid underestimating the number of trucks visiting warehouse facilities," SCAQMD staff "recommends that lead agencies conservatively assume that an average of 40% of total trips are truck trips [(0.48*10 + 0.2*4)/(10+4)=0.4]." "Appendix E Technical Source Documentation," CaIEEMod User's Guide, July 2013, available at: hM2://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/cega/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/high-cube- resource-caleemod-appendix-e.pdflsfvrsn=2, pp. 15; Ex. A, p. 6. If project specific data is not available, such as detailed trip rates based on a known tenant schedule, this average of 40% provides a reasonably conservative value based on currently available data. Since the future tenant of the Project is unknown, the tenant schedule is also unknown, and a 40% truck fleet mix should therefore be assumed. Ex. A, p. 6. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 8of15 SWAPE also notes that the SCAQMD has made similar comments regarding the use of the Fontana Truck Study in other proposed land use developments subject to CEQA. Id. For example, the SCAQMD commented on the Addendum to the Heartland Specific Plan EIR located in Beaumont, claiming that it should have used a "more typical 40% truck fleet mix" instead of the truck fleet mix utilized by the Addendum to the EIR. See "Review of the Addendum to the Heartland Specific Plan Certified EIR," SCAQMD, June 2013, available at: http://www.agmd. gov/docs/default-source/cega/comment-letters/2013/june/heartland-specific- lap n.pdf, p. 3; Ex. A, p. 6. Also of particular note, proposed warehouses in the City of Fontana are using the truck fleet mixes recommended by the SCAQMD and not the Fontana Truck Study. Ex. A, p. 6. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared for the West Valley Logistics Center by Urban Crossroads, The SCAQMD is currently recommending the use of the ITE Trip Generation manual in conjunction with their truck mix by axle -type to better quantify trip rates associated with local warehouse and distribution projects, as truck emission represent more than 90 percent of air quality impacts from these projects. This recommended procedure has been utilized for the purposes of this analysis in effort to be consistent with other technical studies being prepared for the Project. "Traffic Impact Analysis, West Valley Logistics Center," Urban Crossroads, October 2017, available at: https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenterNiew/24049, p. 100. In order to demonstrate consistency with analysis for other warehouse projects within SCAQMD's jurisdiction and the City of Fontana, SWAPE concludes that the Traffic Generation Assessment, as well as the Project's air modeling, should have used the truck fleet percentages recommended by the SCAQMD. Ex. A, p. 7. 2. The City Fails to Adequately Evaluate Health Risks from Diesel Particulate Matter Emissions. The August 2019 Air Quality Analysis concluded that the Project's construction and operational health risks would be less than significant without actually conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk assessment ("HRA"). Specifically, the Air Quality Analysis attempts to justify this claim, stating, Results of the LST analysis indicate that the project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during construction (see Table 8). Results of the LST analysis also indicate that the project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during operational activity (see Table 9). Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during project construction or operation. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 9of15 August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, p. 23. However, SWAPE concludes this justification and subsequent less than significant impact finding is incorrect for several reasons. Ex. A, p. 7. First, the use of the LST method to determine the Project's health risk impacts on nearby, existing sensitive receptors is incorrect. Id. The LST method assesses the impact of pollutants at a local level, but it only evaluates impacts from criteria air pollutants. Id. According to the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document prepared by the SCAQMD, the LST analysis is only applicable to NOx, CO, PM 10, and PM2.5 emissions, collectively criteria pollutants. See "Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology." SCAQMD, Revised July 2008, available at: hgp://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized- significance-thresholds/final-1st-methodology-document.pdf, Ex. A, p. 7. Because the LST method can only be applied to criteria pollutants, this method cannot be used to determine whether emissions from diesel particulate matter ("DPM"), a known human carcinogen, will result in a significant health risk impact to nearby receptors. Ex. A, p. 7. Therefore, the Air Quality Analysis did not analyze health impacts from exposures to toxic air contaminants ("TACs") such as DPM. Second, the omission of a quantified HRA is inconsistent with the most recent guidance published by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment ("OEHHA"), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California. Id. OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments in February 2015. See "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot_ spots/hotspots20l5.htm1. This guidance describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. It recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors. Id., p. 8-18. Construction of the Project will produce emissions of DPM through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a construction period of approximately 12 months. See August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, pp. 37, 64, 91, 118. Therefore, per OEHHA, SWAPE recommends that health risk impacts from the Project's construction be evaluated in an EIR. The OEHHA guidance also recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR"). "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: hM2:Hoehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, pp. 8-6, 8-15. Even though the Air Quality Analysis does not provide the expected lifetime of the Project, the Project operation will generate a net increase of approximately 181 daily trips, which will generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions, and it can reasonably be assumed that the Project will operate for at least 30 years or more. See August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, p. 17; Ex. A, p. 8. SWAPE therefore recommends that health risk impacts from the Project's operation also be evaluated in an EIR since a 30 year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2 month and 6 month requirements set forth by OEHHA. Ex. A, p. 8. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 10 of 15 Third, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified HRAA to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction, the Air Quality Analysis failed to compare the excess health risk to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million. See "South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds." SCAQMD, April 2019, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/scagmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2; Ex. A, p. 8. The City therefore cannot conclude less than significant health risk impacts resulting from Project construction and operation without quantifying the emissions to compare to the proper threshold. Ex. A, p. 8. 3. A Screening -Level Health Risk Assessment for the Project Indicates a Significant Impact to Human Health from Diesel Particulate Matter. SWAPE prepared a screening -level HRA to evaluate potential impacts from the construction and operation of the Project. Ex. A, p. 9. SWAPE used AERSCREEN, the leading screening -level air quality dispersion model. Id. SWAPE used a sensitive receptor distance of 25 meters and analyzed impacts to individuals at different stages of life based on OEHHA and SCAQMD guidance. Id., pp. 9-12. SWAPE found that the excess cancer risk for children, infants, and over the course of a residential lifetime to be 71, 120, and 210 in one million, respectively. Id., p. 12. These all exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified in the Air Quality Analysis. Id. Since the Project would result in significant air quality impacts, it may not be exempted under the Class 32 exemption. 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15332(c), (d). Also, since the Project will have significant adverse environmental impacts, it may not be subject to a categorical exemption. 14 CCR § 15300.2(c). 4. The City Fails to Provide Substantial Evidence that the Project's Greenhouse Gas Impacts are Less -Than -Significant. The August 2019 Greenhouse Gas Analysis concluded that the Project's greenhouse gas ("GHG") impact would be less than significant based on the SCAQMD bright line. Specifically, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis states: [C]onstruction and operation of the project would result in the annual equivalent emission of 1,163 MT CO2E per year, and a net increase of 938 MT CO2E over the existing condition. Project GHG emissions would be less than the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses. As project DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 11 of 15 emissions would be less than the 10,000 MT CO2E screening level, GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant. August 2019 Greenhouse Gas Analysis, p. 22. It goes on to state "[t]he project would be consistent with the City's Sustainable Community Action through compliance and adherence to local regulations. Impacts would be less than significant." Id., p. 25. SWAPE concludes, however, that this analysis and subsequent less than significant impact finding is incorrect for three reasons. First, the Project's GHG analysis is incorrect and unsubstantiated. Ex. A, p. 14. As discussed above, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis reports that the Project would result in annual GHG emissions of 1.163 MT CO2e/year and concludes that emissions from the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD bright -line threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year. August 2019 Greenhouse Gas Analysis, p. 22. However, this is incorrect. The Greenhouse Gas Analysis relies on an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model. Ex. A, p. 14. Specifically, the CalEEMod model relies upon incorrect input parameters to estimate the Project's criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions. This is incorrect, as the model underestimates the Project's GHG emissions. Further, the use of 10,000 MT CO2e/year industrial threshold is incorrect since the Project will include both office and warehouse land uses. Id. The December 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda states that the Project consists of "8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area." December 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda, p. 498. Therefore, the Project would include both industrial and commercial land uses and should be considered a mixed-use development. As a result, the Project's GHG emissions should have been compared to the SCAQMD's mixed-use threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year. Ex. A, p. 14. Second, SWAPE's updated analysis indicates a potentially significant impact. Id. Applicable thresholds and site-specific modeling demonstrate that the Project will result in a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified for the Project. The updated CalEEMod output files modeled by SWAPE with updated Project -specific information disclose the Project's emissions, which include approximately 474 MT CO2e of total construction emissions and approximately 3,509 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions. Id. SWAPE compared the total Project's GHG emissions to the SCAQMD mixed-use threshold, and found that the Project's GHG emissions exceed the threshold. Id., p. 15. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 12 of 15 SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Project Phase Project (MT CO2e/year) Construction (amortized over 30 years) 15.81 Area 0.01 Energy 1,521.61 Mobile 1,821.47 Waste 49.09 Water 117.19 Total 3,525.18 Threshold 3,000 Exceed? Yes As demonstrated in the table above, the Project would generate a total of approximately 3,525 MT CO2e/year when modeled correctly, exceeding the SCAQMD"s 3,000 MT CO2e/year mixed-use project screening threshold, and thus, a Tier 4 service population analysis is warranted. Id. SWAPE estimated that there will be 149 new employees supported by the Project, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers values for warehousing and general office land uses. See "BUILDING AREA PER EMPLOYEE BY BUSINESS TYPE." May 2008, City of Davis, available at: https://www.ciiyofdavis.org/home/showdocument?id=4579; Ex. A, p. 15. When dividing the Project's GHG emissions by a service population value of 149 people, SWAPE found that the Project would emit approximately 23.66 MT CO2e/SP/year. Ex. A, p. 15. This exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, as well as the inapplicable SCAQMD 2020 efficiency target of 4.8 MT CO2e/SP/year. Id. SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase 7 Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Annual Emissions 3,525.18 Service Population 149 Service Population Efficiency 23.66 Threshold Exceed? 3.00 Yes Since the Project would result in a potentially significant impact not previously identified, an EIR should be prepared for the Project and additional mitigation should be considered and implemented where necessary, per CEQA guidelines. Id., p. 16. DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 13 of 15 Third, the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan cannot be relied upon to determine project significance. Id. The August 2019 Greenhouse Gas Analysis relies on the Project's consistency with the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan to determine that impacts would be less than significant. However, SWAPE concludes that this incorrect because the Action Plan fails to include goals or targets beyond 2020 and does not include Project -specific measures. Id. According to the Rancho Cucamonga Community Action Plan, This Plan identifies steps that Rancho Cucamonga can take to contribute towards a GHG reduction target that reduces emissions approximately 15 percent below 2008 levels by 2020. In total, existing actions, state programs, and the goals, policies, and actions identified in the Sustainable Community Action Plan will reduce GHG emissions in Rancho Cucamonga up to 16.9 percent by 2020. "Sustainable Community Action Plan," Rancho Cucamonga, April 2017, pp. 22-23. The Plan includes steps for the City, but fails to include project -specific measures. Ex. A, p. 16. Even so, the steps it does include only account for reductions through 2020. Since the Project will not become operational until after 2020, the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan doesn't apply to the Project. Id. CEQA Guidelines section 15064(h)(3) permits lead agencies to find projects not cumulatively considerable when a project complies with an approved plan or mitigation program that, provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problems within the geographic area in which the project is located ... [and] the lead agency should explain how implementing the particular requirements in the plan, regulation or program ensure that the project's incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable. CEQA Guidelines § 15064(h)(3) (emphasis added). Here, however, the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan fails to include any specific project -level binding requirements. Ex. A, p. 17. Therefore, the Project cannot rely on this plan to determine a less than significant GHG impact under CEQA. Since the Project would result in significant air quality impacts, it may not be exempted under the Class 32 exemption. 14 Cal. Admin. Code §§ 15332(c), (d). Also, since the Project will have significant adverse environmental impacts, it may not be subject to a categorical exemption. 14 CCR §15300.2(c). DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 14 of 15 5. The Project may have Significant Cumulative Impacts, which the City Failed to Analyze. As shown above, the construction and operation of a 103,945 square foot warehouse building is likely to create significant adverse air quality impacts related to construction equipment, and operational emissions from diesel trucks and other vehicles associated with the Project. The Project therefore may also have significant cumulative air quality impacts when considered together with the many other similar projects nearby. Review of the Project site on Google Earth demonstrates that the Project is located in close proximity to the Goodman Logistics Center, Heartland Express Trucking, Acra Machinery, an ARCO gas station, Legend Transportation Trucking, T&R Lumber, Cruz Truck Parts, DP Rancho Cucamonga DC distributing, UFF T Truck & Trailer Repair, South Bay International, Inc. manufacturing, Pacific Coast Recycling, Aguilar Trucking, Vista Metals Corporation, and more. Ex. A, p. 13. Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed Project will occur in conjunction with the operation of these other existing industrial facilities. Id. These projects will have a significant cumulative impact when considered together with the proposed Project. Recognizing that several projects may together have a considerable impact, CEQA requires an agency to consider the "cumulative impacts" of a project along with other projects in the area. Pub. Resources Code §21083(b); CEQA Guidelines § 15355(b). If a project may have cumulative impacts, the agency must prepare an EIR, since "a project may have a significant effect on the environment if `[t]he possible effects of a project are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. "' Communities for a Better Environment v. Calif. Res. Agency, 103 Cal.AppAth at 98, 114; Kings County Farm Bur. v. City of Hanford (1990) 221 Cal.App.3d 692, 721. It is vital that an agency assess "`the environmental damage [that] often occurs incrementally from a variety of small sources ... "' Bakersfield Citizens For Local Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 1184, 1214. "[U]nder CEQA, the lead agency bears a burden to investigate potential environmental impacts. `If the local agency has failed to study an area of possible environmental impact, a fair argument may be based on the limited facts in the record. Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.' (Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal. App. 3d 296, 311; County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v. County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal. App. 4th 1544). SWAPE notes that the City failed to evaluate the cumulative impacts resulting from nearby industrial land uses. Id., p. 13. Due to this failure, the cumulative risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors to the Project in conjunction with the surrounding existing sources of TACs is unknown. Id. Therefore, the Project may result in a significant air quality impact that has not been previously DRC2019-00590 April 10, 2020 Page 15 of 15 identified or addressed. CEQA requires the City to consider cumulative impacts of the Project along with the dozen or so industrial facilities in the vicinity of the Project. SWAPE's evidence demonstrates that the Project may have a significant cumulative impact and the City bears the burden of investigating this environmental impact. The City is therefore required to prepare an EIR to analyze and mitigate this impact. Since the Project will have significant cumulative impacts when considered with other similar projects in the area, it may not be exempted from CEQA review. 14 CCR § 15300.2. IV. Conclusion For the above reasons, the CEQA Analysis for the Project and its reliance on the stated exemptions should be withdrawn, an EIR should be prepared, and the draft EIR should be circulated for public review and comment in accordance with CEQA. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Richard Drury Paige Fennie LOZEAU DRURY LLP Exhibit A S��� Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 26562 9th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310) 795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com March 27, 2020 Paige Fennie Lozeau I Drury LLP 1939 Harrison Street, Suite 150 Oakland, CA 94612 Subject: Comments on 8545 Pecan Avenue Project Dear Ms. Fennie, We have reviewed the December 2019 Design Review Committee Agenda ("DR"), August 2019 Air Quality Analysis, August 2019 Greenhouse Gas Analysis, and February 2020 Response to Comments ("RTC") for the 8545 Pecan Avenue Project ("Project") located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City"). The Project proposes to demolish a 10,200 -SF truck and trailer repair center and construct a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building as well as 79 parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces on the 4.77 -acre site. Our review concludes that the DR fails to adequately evaluate the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions and health risk impacts associated with construction and operation of the proposed Project are underestimated and inadequately addressed. An EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the project may have on the surrounding environment. As a result of our findings, the proposed Proiect does not qualify for a Class 32 Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and 14 Cal. Code of Reps. 1500 et seq. ("CEQA Guidelines") and, therefore, a full CEQA analysis must be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. We recommend that the City prepare an environmental impact report ("EIR") with a health risk assessment ("HRA") as required under the Commerce Municipal Code ("CMC" or "Code" Air Quality Incorrect Reliance on Class 32 Categorical Exemption The DR claims that the Project is categorically exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines § 15332 (p. 001). According to CEQA Guidelines § 15332(d), a project can only qualify for a Class 32 Categorical Exemption if "approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality."' However, the Project's Air Quality Analysis relies upon an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model, as discussed below. Furthermore, SWAPE's analysis demonstrates that the Project's air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas impacts may be potentially significant, as discussed below. Thus, the DR's conclusion that the Project's air quality, health risk, noise, and water quality impacts would be less than significant should not be relied upon, and the Class 32 exemption is unsubstantiated. As a result, an EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and health risk impacts that the Project may have on the surrounding environment. Unsubstantiated Input Parameters Used to Estimate Project Emissions The Air Quality Analysis relies on emissions calculated with CalEEMod.2016.3.2.2 CaIEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project -specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.3 Once all of the values are inputted into the model, the Project's construction and operational emissions are calculated, and "output files" are generated. These output files disclose to the reader what parameters were utilized in calculating the Project's air pollutant emissions and make known which default values were changed as well as provide justification for the values selected.' Review of the Project's air modeling demonstrates that the model underestimates emissions associated with Project activities. As previously stated, the Air Quality Analysis relies on air pollutant emissions calculated using CaIEEMod. When we reviewed the Project's CaIEEMod output files, provided as Attachment 1 to the Air Quality Analysis, we found that several of the values inputted into the model were not consistent with information disclosed in the DR. As a result, the Project's construction and operational emissions are underestimated. An EIR should be prepared to include an updated air quality analysis that adequately evaluates the impacts that construction and operation of the Project will have on local and regional air quality. Failure to Model All Proposed Land Uses i CEQA Guidelines § 15332(c), available at: https://resources.ca.gov/cepa/guidelines/artl9.html. 2 CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User's Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4. 3 Ibid, p. 1, 9. ' CAPCOA (November 2017) CalEEMod User's Guide, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=41 p. 11, 12 —13. A key feature of the CalEEMod program is the "remarks" feature, where the user explains why a default setting was replaced by a "user defined" value. These remarks are included in the report. 2 According to the DR, the proposed Project would include 79 parking spaces (p. 2). However, review of the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrates that no parking was included in the model (see excerpt below) (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 32, 59, 86, 113). 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unretrigerated WarehouseiJo Rall 103.94 1000 sgft 4.77 103.945.00 0 As you can see in the excerpt above, no parking was included in the Project's CalEEMod model. This presents an issue, as the land use type and size features are used throughout CalEEMod to determine default variable and emission factors that go into the model's calculations.' The square footage of a land use is used for certain calculations such as determining the wall space to be painted (i.e., VOC emissions from architectural coatings) and volume that is heated or cooled (i.e., energy impacts). Thus, by failing to include the proposed parking land use, the model underestimates the Project's construction and operational emissions. As a result, the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Failure to Consider Cold -Storage Requirements The Project's CalEEMod model incorrectly assumes that the proposed warehouse will be exclusively unrefrigerated. As a result, the Project's emissions may be underestimated. The DR and associated documents fail to provide any indication that the future tenants of the proposed warehouse are known at this time. Furthermore, as is discussed by the SCAQMD, "CEQA requires the use of 'conservative analysis' to afford 'fullest possible protection of the environment. "'6 Thus, to conduct the most conservative analysis, the warehouse building should have been modeled as refrigerated space in order account for the additional emissions that refrigeration requirements may generate. However, review of the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the model assumed that the proposed warehouse will be exclusively unrefrigerated (see excerpt below) (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 32, 59, 86, 113). 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Unrefrigerated Warehouse -JD Rail 103.94 1000 sgft 4.77 103.945.00 0 As you can see in the excerpt above, the model failed to consider potential cold storage requirements. This presents an issue, as refrigerated warehouses release more air pollutants and GHG emissions when compared to unrefrigerated warehouses for three reasons. First, warehouses equipped with cold storage (refrigerators and freezers, for example) are known to consume more energy when compared to ' "CalEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=41 p. 18. 6 "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Inland Empire Logistics Council, June 2014, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip- rate-study-for-air-quality-analysis/final-ielc 6-19-2014.pdf?sfvrsn=2 3 warehouses without cold storage.' Second, warehouses equipped with cold storage typically require refrigerated trucks, which are known to idle for much longer, even up to an hour, when compared to unrefrigerated hauling trucks.' Lastly, according to a July 2014 Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage presentation prepared by the SCAQMD, it was found that hauling trucks that require refrigeration result in greater truck trip rates when compared to non -refrigerated hauling trucks.' Therefore, by modeling the Project's emissions without refrigerated warehouses, the Air Quality Analysis may underestimate the Project's operational emissions. An EIR should be prepared to account for the possibility of refrigerated warehouse needs by future tenants. Use of an Incorrect Construction Schedule According to the Air Quality Analysis, the Building Construction and Architectural Coating phases are planned to overlap and last a total of 230 days (p. 16, Table 4). However, review of the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrates that Building Construction and Architectural Coating were modeled separately, with Building Construction lasting 230 days and Architectural Coating lasting 115 days that do not overlap (see excerpt below) (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 37, 64, 91, 118). Construction Phase Phase Phase Name Phase Type Stan Date End Date Num Days I Num Days I Phase Description Number I I Week 1 :Demolition :Demolition i 111 2020 11 M020 1 51 201 ------- F------------------------ ----------------------- !Site f------------ I-------------4,----4----- ------------------------- 2 :Site Preparation Preparation 11/29/2020 12'412020 1 51 51 ------- F------------------------ -----------------------f------------------------------- ------------------------- 3 :Grading :Grading 12/512020 12'1412020 1 51 8� 4 ------------------------ 'Building Construction Building Construction 12/15/2020 1!112021 --- 5 239 5 :Paving :Paying 11/712021 11127!2021 1 51 181 -------F 6 :Architectural Coating --- :Architectural Coating 7/2612021 —r---T— 12I3112021 � ------------------------ 5 115 As you can see in the excerpt above, the model assumes that the Building Construction phase would last 230 days and the Architectural Coating phase would last 115 days and that the phases would not overlap. Thus, the model is inconsistent with the construction schedule provided in the Air Quality Analysis. This presents an issue, as the model may underestimate the Project's maximum daily emissions by spreading emissions resulting from Building Construction and Architectural Coating over a larger amount of time, as well as assuming that the phases will not overlap. As a result, the model should not be relied upon to determine Project significance. Incorrect Reliance on the Fontana Truck Trip Study The Project's air modeling and Trip Generation Assessment, rely upon incorrect fleet mix percentages, and as a result, the Project's mobile -related operational emissions may be underestimated. According to ' Managing Energy Costs in Warehouses, Business Energy Advisor, available at: http://bizenergyadvisor.com/warehouses s "Estimation of Fuel Use by Idling Commercial Trucks," p. 8, available at: http://www.transportation.ani.gov/pdfs/TA/373.pdf ' "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate- study-for-air-quality-analysis/finaltrucktripstudymsc072514.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 7, 9 4 the RTC, "the proposed trip generation [is] based upon trip generation rates obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, 101h Edition, 2017, and City of Fontana, Truck Trip Generation Study, August 2003" (RTC, p. 5). However, this is incorrect, as the South Coast Air Quality Management District ("SCAQMD") has determined that the Fontana Study has limited applicability to warehouse projects. As a result, the Fontana Study should not be relied upon to determine the Project's mobile -source emissions. SCAQMD staff finds the following issues with the Fontana Study: 10 • The overall trip rate is based on only four warehouses total, which includes two warehouses with zeros. In other words, the results of the Fontana Study were based on only two data points. As is disclosed in the Fontana Study, the daily trip rate was only based on data from a Target warehouse and a TAB warehouse." • The Fontana Study does not report any 24-hour daily truck trip rates. According to the Fontana Study, "Trip generation statistics for daily truck trips were not calculated because vehicle classifications counts could not be obtained from the driveway 24-hour counts." 12 • The trip rates using the Fontana study are calculated based on a 20 percent truck fleet mix, which is inconsistent with SCAQMD's recommendation that agencies use a truck fleet mix of 40%.13 The RTC claims that the Trip Generation Assessment utilizes the following fleet mix: 79.57 percent passenger cars, 3.46 percent 2 -axle trucks, 4.64 percent 3 -axle trucks, and 12.33 percent 4 -axle trucks (RTC, p. 5, Table 1). Furthermore, according to the Air Quality Analysis, the Project is estimated to generate 181 daily trips, including 37 truck trips (p. 17). Review of the Project's CalEEMod output files demonstrates that the truck model calculated a default value of 37 daily truck trips (see excerpt below) (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 54, 135). 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Unrefrigerated'r larehouse-No Rail 36.38 1 36.38 1 36.38 493.965 493.965 Total 36.38 1 36.38 1 36.38 493.965 493.965 Thus, the remaining 144 trips were included in the autos model (see excerpt below) (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 81, 108) 10 "Warehouse Truck Trip Study Data Results and Usage" Presentation. SCAQMD Mobile Source Committee, July 2014, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cepa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate- study-for-air-quality-analysis/finaltrucktripstudymsc072514.pdf?sfvrsn=2, p. 10 11 "Truck Trip Generation Study." City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/622, p. 35 12 "Truck Trip Generation Study." City of Fontana, County of San Bernardino, State of California, August 2003, available at: http://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/622, p. 6 13 "CaIEEMod User's Guide, Appendix E." CAPCOA, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/caleemod-appendixe.pdf, pp. 15. 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT U^refrigeratec 0isrehouse-ho Rail 144.48 1 144.48 144.48 619,186 619.186 Total 144.48 144.48 144.48 619,186 619.186 As you can see in the above excerpts, approximately 20% of the total daily trips were modeled as truck trips. However, this fleet mix, reflected in both the air modeling and the RTC, is not consistent with recommendations set forth by the SCAQMD, the lead agency for the Project, and does not accurately represent the percentage of trucks that are expected to access the site on a daily basis. Rather, SCAQMD recommends that lead agencies assume a truck fleet mix of 40%.14 According to Appendix E: Technical Source Documentation of the 2013 CaIEEMod User's Guide, "in order to avoid underestimating the number of trucks visiting warehouse facilities," SCAQMD staff "recommends that lead agencies conservatively assume that an average of 40% of total trips are truck trips [(0.48*10 + 0.2*4)/(10+4)=0.4)]."15 If Project -specific data is not available, such as detailed trip rates based on a known tenant schedule, this average of 40% provides a reasonably conservative value based on currently available data. Since the future tenant is unknown, the tenant schedule is also not known; therefore, a 40% truck fleet mix should also be assumed." The SCAQMD has also made similar comments regarding the use of the Fontana Truck Trip Study in other proposed land use development projects subject to CEQA. For example, the SCAQMD commented that the Addendum to the Heartland Specific Plan EIR, located in Beaumont, should have also used a "more typical 40% truck fleet mix" instead of the truck fleet mix utilized by the Addendum to the EIR. 17 Furthermore, proposed warehouses in the City of Fontana are using the truck fleet mixes recommended by the SCAQMD instead of the Fontana Study. According to the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads for the West Valley Logistics Center, "The SCAQMD is currently recommending the use of the ITE Trip Generation manual in conjunction with their truck mix by axle -type to better quantify trip rates associated with local warehouse and distribution projects, as truck emission represent more than 90 percent of air quality impacts from these projects. This recommended procedure has been utilized for the purposes of this analysis in effort to be consistent with other technical studies being prepared for the Project."18 14 "CaIEEMod User's Guide, Appendix E." CAPCOA, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/caleemod-appendixe.pdf, pp. 15. 11 "Appendix E Technical Source Documentation." CaIEEMod User's Guide, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cepa/handbook/high-cube-warehouse-trip-rate-study-for-air-quality- analysis/high-cube-resource-caleemod-appendix-e.Of?sfvrsn=2, pp. 15 16 "CaIEEMod User's Guide, Appendix E." CAPCOA, July 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/caleemod-appendixe.pdf, pp. 15. 17 "Review of the Addendum to the Heartland Specific Plan Certified EIR," SCAQMD, June 2013, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cepa/comment-letters/2013/lune/heartland-specific-plan.pdf, p. 3 18 "Traffic Impact Analysis, West Valley Logistics Center," Urban Crossroads, October 2017, available at: https://www.fontana.org/DocumentCenter/View/24049, p. 100 11 Therefore, to demonstrate consistency with analyses for other warehouse projects within SCAQMD jurisdiction and the City of Fontana itself, the Traffic Generation Assessment, as well as the Project's air modeling, should have used the truck fleet percentages recommended by the SCAQMD. Diesel Particulate Matter Health Risk Emissions Inadequately Evaluated The Air Quality Analysis concludes that the Project's construction and operational health risk impacts would be less than significant without conducting a quantified construction or operational health risk assessments ("HRA"). More specifically, the Air Quality Analysis attempts to justify this claim by stating, "Results of the LST analysis indicate that the project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during construction (see Table 8). Results of the LST analysis also indicate that the project would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs during operational activity (see Table 9). Therefore, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations during project construction or operation" (Air Quality Analysis, p. 23) However, this justification and subsequent less than significant impact finding is incorrect for several reasons. First, the use of the LST method to determine the Projects health risk impacts on nearby, existing sensitive receptors is incorrect. While the LST method assesses the impact of pollutants at a local level, it only evaluates impacts from criteria air pollutants. According to the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology document prepared by the SCAQMD, the LST analysis is only applicable to NO, CO, PM1o, and PM2.5 emissions, which are collectively referred to as criteria air pollutants.19 Because the LST method can only be applied to criteria air pollutants, this method cannot be used to determine whether emissions from DPM, a known human carcinogen, will result in a significant health risk impact to nearby sensitive receptors. As a result, health impacts from exposure to toxic air contaminants (TACs), such as diesel particulate matter (DPM), were not analyzed, thus leaving a gap within the DR's analysis Second, the omission of a quantified HRA is inconsistent with the most recent guidance published by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), the organization responsible for providing guidance on conducting HRAs in California. In February of 2015, OEHHA released its most recent Risk Assessment Guidelines: Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments.20 This guidance document describes the types of projects that warrant the preparation of an HRA. Construction of the Project will produce emissions of DPM, a human carcinogen, through the exhaust stacks of construction equipment over a construction period of approximately 12 -months (Air Quality Analysis, pp. 37, 64, 91, 118). The OEHHA document recommends that all short-term projects lasting at least two months be " "Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology." SCAQMD, Revised July 2008, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/final-Ist- methodology-document.pdf. 20 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/hotspots2015.html 7 evaluated for cancer risks to nearby sensitive receptors.21 Therefore, per OEHHA guidelines, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project construction be evaluated in an EIR. Furthermore, once construction of the Project is complete, the Project will operate for a long period of time. Project operation will generate a net increase of approximately 181 daily vehicle trips, which will generate additional exhaust emissions and continue to expose nearby sensitive receptors to DPM emissions (Air Quality Analysis, p. 17). The OEHHA document recommends that exposure from projects lasting more than 6 months be evaluated for the duration of the project, and recommends that an exposure duration of 30 years be used to estimate individual cancer risk for the maximally exposed individual resident ("MEIR").22 Even though we were not provided with the expected lifetime of the Project, we can reasonably assume that the Project will operate for at least 30 years, if not more. Therefore, we recommend that health risk impacts from Project operation also be evaluated in an EIR, as a 30 -year exposure duration vastly exceeds the 2 -month and 6 -month requirements set forth by OEHHA. These recommendations reflect the most recent health risk policy, and as such, an updated assessment of health risks to nearby sensitive receptors from Project construction and operation should be included in a Project -specific EIR. Third, by claiming a less than significant impact without conducting a quantified HRA to nearby, existing sensitive receptors as a result of Project construction, the Air Quality Analysis fails to compare the excess health risk to the SCAQMD's specific numeric threshold of 10 in one million. 23 Thus, the DR cannot conclude less than significant health risk impacts resulting from Project construction and operation without quantifying emissions to compare to the proper threshold. In an effort to demonstrate the potential risk posed by the Project to nearby sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening -level construction and operational HRA. The results of our assessment, as described below, demonstrate that construction and operational DPM emissions may result in a potentially significant health risk impact that was not previously identified or evaluated within the DR. As such, an updated assessment of health risk impacts to nearby sensitive receptors from Project construction and operation should be included in a revised CEQA evaluation for the Project. Screening -Level Analysis Demonstrates Significant Impacts In an effort to demonstrate the potential health risk posed by Project construction and operation to nearby, existing sensitive receptors, we prepared a simple screening -level HRA. The results of our assessment, as described below, demonstrate that the Project may result in a significant impact. 21 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p. 8-18 22 "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: http://oehha.ca.gov/air/hot spots/2015/2015GuidanceManual.pdf, p. 8-6, 8-15 21 "South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds." SCAQMD, April 2019, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/scagmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. W In order to conduct our screening -level risk assessment we relied upon AERSCREEN, which is a screening level air quality dispersion model.24 The model replaced SCREEN3, and AERSCREEN is included in the OEHHA25 and the California Air Pollution Control Officers Associated ("CAPCOA")26 guidance as the appropriate air dispersion model for Level 2 health risk screening assessments ("HRSAs"). A Level 2 HRSA utilizes a limited amount of site-specific information to generate maximum reasonable downwind concentrations of air contaminants to which nearby sensitive receptors may be exposed. If an unacceptable air quality hazard is determined to be possible using AERSCREEN, a more refined modeling approach is required prior to approval of the Project. We prepared a preliminary HRA of the Project's construction and operational health-related impact to residential sensitive receptors using the annual PMlo exhaust estimates from the SWAPE annual CaIEEMod output files. Consistent with recommendations set forth by OEHHA, we assumed residential exposure begins during the third trimester stage of life. The Project's construction CalEEMod output files indicate that construction activities will generate approximately 316 pounds of diesel particulate matter ("DPM"). The AERSCREEN model relies on a continuous average emission rate to simulate maximum downward concentrations from point, area, and volume emission sources. To account for the variability in equipment usage and truck trips over Project construction, we calculated an average DPM emission rate by the following equation: grams 316.2 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate— = x x x = 0.004235 g/s second 392 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated a construction emission rate of 0.004235 grams per second (g/s). Subtracting the 392 -day construction duration from the total residential duration of 30 years, we assumed that after Project construction the MEIR would be exposed to the Project's operational DPM for an additional 28.93 years, approximately. The Project's operational CalEEMod emissions indicate that operational activities will generate approximately 96 pounds of DPM per year throughout operation. Applying the same equation used to estimate the construction DPM rate, we estimated the following emission rate for Project operation: grams 96 lbs 453.6 grams 1 day 1 hour Emission Rate ( ) = x x x = 0.0014 g/s second 365 days lbs 24 hours 3,600 seconds Using this equation, we estimated an operational emission rate of 0.0014 g/s. Construction and operational activity was simulated as a 4.77 -acre rectangular area source in AERSCREEN with dimensions of 199 meters by 97 meters. A release height of three meters was selected to represent the height of exhaust stacks on operational equipment and other heavy-duty vehicles, and an initial vertical dimension of one and a half meters was used to simulate instantaneous plume dispersion upon release. 24 U.S. EPA (April 2011) AERSCREEN Released as the EPA Recommended Screening Model, htto://www.eoa.eov/ttn/scram/euidance/clarification/20110411 AERSCREEN Release Memo.odf 21 Supra, fn 20. 26 CAPCOA (July 2009) Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA HRA LU Guidelines 8-6-09.pdf. E] An urban meteorological setting was selected with model -default inputs for wind speed and direction distribution. The AERSCREEN model generates maximum reasonable estimates of single -hour DPM concentrations from the Project site. EPA guidance suggests that in screening procedures, the annualized average concentration of an air pollutant be estimated by multiplying the single -hour concentration by 10%.27 According to the DR, there are single family residences to the north of the Project site (DR, p. 001). Review of Google Earth demonstrates that these sensitive receptors are less than 25 meters from the edge of the Project site. Thus, the single -hour concentration estimated by AERSCREEN for Project construction at the nearest residential sensitive receptor is approximately 6.056 µg/m3 DPM at approximately 25 meters downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.6056 µg/m3 for Project construction at the closest sensitive receptor. For Project operation, the single -hour concentration is estimated by AERSCREEN is approximately 1.974 µg/m3 at approximately 25 meters downwind. Multiplying this single -hour concentration by 10%, we get an annualized average concentration of 0.1974 µg/m3 for Project operation at the closest exposed sensitive receptor. We calculated the excess cancer risk to the closest exposed residential receptors using applicable HRA methodologies prescribed by OEHHA and the SCAQMD. Consistent with the default CalEEMod construction schedule, the annualized average concentration for construction was used for the entire third trimester of pregnancy (0.25 years) and for 0.82 years of the infantile stage of life (0 — 2 years). The annualized average concentration for operation was used for the remainder of the 30 -year exposure period, including the remainder of the infantile stage of life, child stage of life (2 —16 years), and adult stage of life (16 — 30 years). Consistent with OEHHA, SCAQMD, BAAQMD, SMAQMD, and SJVAPCD guidance, we used Age Sensitivity Factors (ASFs) to account for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity 21 "Screening Procedures for Estimating the Air Quality Impact of Stationary Sources Revised." EPA, 1992, available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/EPA-454R-92-019 OCR.pdf; see also "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 4-36 10 of air pollution.", 29, 30, 31, 32 According to the above -referenced guidance, we recommend that the quantified cancer risk be multiplied by a factor of ten during the third trimester of pregnancy and during the infant stage of life (0 to 2 years) and multiplied by a factor of three during the child stage of life (2 to 16 years). However, while we recommend this methodology as the most health -protective analysis, we also included the quantified cancer risk without adjusting for the heightened susceptibility of young children to the carcinogenic toxicity of air pollution in accordance with older OEHHA guidance from 2003. This guidance utilizes a less health protective scenario than what is currently recommended by the SCAQMD, the air quality district responsible for the City, and several other air districts in the state. In order to evaluate impacts most conservatively, we strongly recommend the use of age sensitivity factors as is recommended by the most recent guidance. Furthermore, in accordance with guidance set forth by OEHHA, we used the 951h percentile breathing rates for infants.33 We used a cancer potency factor of 1.1 (mg/kg -day) -1 and an averaging time of 25,550 days. OEHHA recommends that a 30 -year exposure duration be used as the basis for estimating cancer risk at the MEIR.34 Consistent with OEHHA guidance, exposure to the MEIR was assumed to begin in the third trimester of pregnancy to provide the most conservative estimate of air quality hazards. Finally, according to SCAQMD guidance, we used a Fraction of Time At Home (FAH) Value of 1 for the 3rd trimester and infant receptors.35 The results of our calculations are shown in the table below. ""Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. 29 "Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the Proposed The Exchange (SCH No. 2018071058)." SCAQMD, March 2019, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cepa/comment- letters/2019/march/RVC190115-03.pdf?sfvrsn=8, p. 4. 30 "California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines." BAAQMD, May 2017, available at: http://www.baagmd.gov/—/media/files/planning-and-research/cepa/cepa guidelines may2017-pdf.pdf?la=en, p. 56; see also "Recommended Methods for Screening and Modeling Local Risks and Hazards." BAAQMD, May 2011, available at: http://www.baagmd.gov/—/media/Files/Planning%20and%2OResearch/CEQA/BAAQMD%2OModeling%2OApproac h.ashx, p. 65, 86. 31 "Guidance Document for the Mobile Sources Air Toxics Protocol." SMAQMD, July 2018, available at: http://www.airguality.org/Land UseTransportation/Documents/FinalMSATProtocoIGuidance7-10-18.pdf, p. 8. 32 "Update to District's Risk Management Policy to Address OEHHA's Revised Risk Assessment Guidance Document." SJVAPCD, May 2015, available at: https://www.vallevair.org/busind/pto/staff-report-5-28-15.pdf, p. 8, 20, 24. 33 "Supplemental Guidelines for Preparing Risk Assessments for the Air Toxics 'Hot Spots' Information and Assessment Act," June 5, 2015, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/planning/risk- assessment/ab2588-risk-assessment-guidelines.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 19. "Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf ""Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 8-6. " "Risk Assessment Procedures for Rules 1401, 1401.1, and 212." SCAQMD, August 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/Proposed- Rules/1401/riskassessmentprocedures 2017 080717.pdf, p. 7. 11 As indicated in the table above, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the closest exposed residential receptor, located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing age sensitivity factors, are approximately 7.9, 71, 120, and 8.2 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the closest exposed residential receptor, utilizing age sensitivity factors, is approximately 210 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, utilizing age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the Air Quality Analysis. Utilizing age sensitivity factors is the most conservative, health -protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and recommendations from the air district. Results without age sensitivity factors are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the closest exposed residential receptor, located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without age sensitivity factors, are approximately 7.9, 24, 12, and 0.82 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the maximally exposed residential receptor, without age sensitivity factors, is approximately 45 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, without age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the Air Quality Analysis. Thus, while we 12 The Closest Exposed Individual at an Existing Residential Receptor Cancer Breathing Duration Concentration Risk Cancer Risk Activity Rate (L/kg- ASF (years) (ug/m3) without with ASFs* day) ASFs* Construction 0.25 0.6056 361 8.2E-07 10 8.2E-06 3rd 3rd Trimester 0.25 8.2E-07 Trimester 8.2E-06 Duration Exposure Construction 0.82 0.6056 1090 8.2E-06 10 8.2E-05 Operation 1.18 0.1974 1090 3.8E-06 10 3.8E-05 Infant Exposure Infant 2.00 1.2E-05 1.2E-04 Duration Exposure Operation 14.00 0.1974 572 2.4E-05 3 7.1E-05 Child Exposure Child 14.00 2.4E-05 7.1E-05 Duration Exposure Operation 14.00 0.1974 261 7.9E-06 1 7.9E-06 Adult Exposure Adult 14.00 7.9E-06 7,9E-06 Duration Exposure Lifetime Exposure Lifetime 30.00 4.5E-05 2,1E-04 Duration Exposure * We, along with CARB and SCAQMD, recommend using the more updated and health protective 2015 OEHHA guidance, which includes ASFs. As indicated in the table above, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the closest exposed residential receptor, located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, utilizing age sensitivity factors, are approximately 7.9, 71, 120, and 8.2 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the closest exposed residential receptor, utilizing age sensitivity factors, is approximately 210 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, utilizing age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the Air Quality Analysis. Utilizing age sensitivity factors is the most conservative, health -protective analysis according to the most recent guidance by OEHHA and recommendations from the air district. Results without age sensitivity factors are presented in the table above, although we do not recommend utilizing these values for health risk analysis. Regardless, the excess cancer risk posed to adults, children, infants, and during the third trimester of pregnancy at the closest exposed residential receptor, located approximately 25 meters away, over the course of Project construction and operation, without age sensitivity factors, are approximately 7.9, 24, 12, and 0.82 in one million, respectively. The excess cancer risk over the course of a residential lifetime (30 years) at the maximally exposed residential receptor, without age sensitivity factors, is approximately 45 in one million. The adult, child, infant, and lifetime cancer risks, without age sensitivity factors, exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 10 in one million, thus resulting in a potentially significant impact not previously addressed or identified by the Air Quality Analysis. Thus, while we 12 recommend the use of age sensitivity factors, health risk impacts exceed the SCAQMD threshold regardless. An agency must include an analysis of health risks that connects the Project's air emissions with the health risk posed by those emissions. Our analysis represents a screening -level HRA, which is known to be conservative and tends to err on the side of health protection." The purpose of the screening -level construction HRA shown above is to demonstrate the link between the proposed Project's emissions and the potential health risk. Our screening -level HRA demonstrates that construction of the Project could result in a potentially significant health risk impact, when correct exposure assumptions and up- to-date, applicable guidance are used. Therefore, since our screening -level construction HRA indicates a potentially significant impact, the City should prepare an EIR with a revised HRA which makes a reasonable effort to connect the Project's air quality emissions and the potential health risks posed to nearby receptors. Thus, the City should prepare an updated, quantified air pollution model as well as an updated, quantified refined health risk assessment which adequately and accurately evaluates health risk impacts associated with both Project construction and operation. Failure to Consider Cumulative Impacts The DR fails to evaluate the cumulative impacts resulting from nearby industrial land uses. As a result, the cumulative risk posed to nearby sensitive receptors to the Project in conjunction with the surrounding existing sources of toxic air contaminants ("TAC(s)") is unknown. Therefore, the proposed Project may result in a significant air quality impact that has not been previously identified or addressed. According to CEQA Guidelines § 15355, "'Cumulative impacts' refers to two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts." CEQA Guidelines § 15064(h)(1) goes onto say, "... the lead agency shall consider whether the cumulative impact is significant and whether the effects of the project are cumulatively considerable. An EIR must be prepared if the cumulative impact may be significant and the project's incremental effect, though individually limited, is cumulatively considerable. 'Cumulatively considerable' means that the incremental effects of an individual project are significant when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." (Emphasis added). Thus, the proposed Project may result in a cumulatively considerable impact when considered in conjunction with nearby industrial facilities. Review of the Project site on Google Earth demonstrates that the proposed Project is located in close proximity to the Goodman Logistics Center, Heartland Express trucking, Acra Machinery, an ARCO gas station, Legend Transportation trucking, T & R Lumber, Cruz Truck Parts, DP Rancho Cucamonga DC distributing, UFF T Truck & Trailer Repair, South Bay International, Inc. manufacturing, Pacific Coast Recycling, Aguilar Trucking, Vista Metals Corporation, and more. Therefore, construction and operation of the proposed Project will occur in conjunction with ""Risk Assessment Guidelines Guidance Manual for Preparation of Health Risk Assessments." OEHHA, February 2015, available at: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf, p. 1-5 13 the operation of these other existing industrial facilities. As a result, and prior to Project approval, we recommend the cumulative health risk be evaluated for sensitive receptors near the proposed Project. Greenhouse Gas Failure to Adequately Evaluate the Project's Greenhouse Gas Impacts The Greenhouse Gas Analysis concludes that the Project's Greenhouse Gas ("GHG") impact would be less than significant based on the SCAQMD bright line. Specifically, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis states: "[C]onstruction and operation of the project would result in the annual equivalent emission of 1,163 MT CO2E per year, and a net increase of 938 MT CO2E over the existing condition. Project GHG emissions would be less than the applicable SCAQMD screening level of 10,000 MT CO2E for industrial uses. As project emissions would be less than the 10,000 MT CO2E screening level, GHG emissions impacts would be less than significant" (Greenhouse Gas Analysis, p. 22). Furthermore, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis goes on to state: "The project would be consistent with the City's Sustainable Community Action through compliance and adherence to local regulations. Impacts would be less than significant" (p. 25). However, this analysis and subsequent less than significant impact finding is incorrect for several reasons. (1) The Project's GHG analysis is incorrect and unsubstantiated; (2) Updated analysis indicates potentially significant impact; and (3) The City's Sustainable Community Action Plan cannot be relied upon to determine Project significance. (1) Incorrect and Unsubstantiated Analysis As discussed above, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis reports that the Project would result in annual GHG emissions of 1,163 MT CO2e/year and concludes that emissions from the Project would not exceed the SCAQMD bright -line threshold of 10,000 MT CO2e/year (Greenhouse Gas Analysis, p. 22). However, this conclusion is incorrect for two reasons. First, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis relies on an incorrect and unsubstantiated air model, as discussed previously. Specifically, the CaIEEMod model relies upon incorrect input parameters to estimate the Project's criteria air pollutant and GHG emissions. This is incorrect, as the model underestimates the Project's GHG emissions. Second, the use of the 10,000 MT CO2e/year industrial threshold is incorrect, as the Project will include both office and warehouse land uses. Regarding the proposed land uses, the DR states that the Project consists of "8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area" (DR, p. 498). Thus, the Project would include both industrial and commercial land uses and should be considered a 14 mixed-use development. As a result, the Project's GHG emissions should have been compared to the SCAQMD's mixed-use threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e.37 (2) Updated Analysis Indicates Potentially Significant Impact Applicable thresholds and site-specific modeling demonstrate that the proposed Project will result in a potentially significant GHG impact not previously identified for the Project. The updated CalEEMod output files, modeled by SWAPE with updated Project -specific information, disclose the Project's emissions, which include approximately 474 MT CO2e of total construction emissions (sum of 2020 and 2021 emissions) and approximately 3,509 MT CO2e/year of annual operational emissions (sum of area, energy, mobile, waste, and water -related emissions). When we compare the total Project's GHG emissions to the SCAQMD mixed-use threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e/year, we find that the Project's GHG emissions exceed the threshold (see table below). SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Proposed Project Phase Project (MT COze/year) Construction (amortized over 30 years) 15.81 Area 0.01 Energy 1,521.61 Mobile 1,821.47 Waste 49.09 Water 117.19 Total 3,525.18 Threshold 3,000 Exceed? Yes As demonstrated in the table above, the proposed Project would generate a total of approximately 3,525 MT CO2e/year when modeled correctly, which exceeds the SCAQMD's 3,000 MT CO2e/year mixed- use project screening threshold. Hence, a Tier 4 service population analysis is warranted. According to CAPCOA's CEQA & Climate Change report, service population is defined as "the sum of the number of residents and the number of jobs supported by the project.1138 The Project documents failed to provide the estimated number of employees supported by the Project, so we estimated a value of 149 new employees, based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers ("ITE") values for warehousing and 3' See SCAQMD (Dec. 5, 2008) Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans, httD://www.aamd.Rov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/Rreenhouse-Rases-(eh2)-ceaa-sienificance- thresholds/ghgboard synopsis.pdf?sfvrsn=2; see also SCAQMD (Oct. 2008) Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/cepa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cepa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf; SCAQMD (Sep. 28, 2010) Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group # 15, httD://www.aamd.eov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/ereenhouse-eases-(ehe)-ceaa-sienificance- thresholds/yea r-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-l5-minutes.pdf. 38 CAPCOA (Jan. 2008) CEQA & Climate Change, p. 71-72, http://www.capcoa.org/wp- content/uploads/2012/03/CAPCOA-White-Pa per. pdf. 15 general offiice land uses.39 As the Project contains no residential land uses, we estimate that the Project's service population would be 149 When dividing the Project's GHG emissions by a service population value of 149 people (residents and employees), we find that the Project would emit approximately 23.66 MT CO2e/SP/year.40 This exceeds the SCAQMD 2035 efficiency target of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, as well as the inapplicable SCAQMD 2020 efficiency target of 4.8 MT CO2e/SP/year (see table below).41 SWAPE Annual Greenhouse Gas Emissions Project Phase Proposed Project (MT CO2e/year) Annual Emissions 3,525.18 Service Population 149 Service Population Efficiency 23.66 Threshold Exceed? 3.00 Yes As you can see in the table above, when we compare the Project's per service population emissions, estimated by SWAPE's Project -specific CalEEMod model, to the 2035 SCAQMD threshold of 3.0 MT CO2e/SP/year, we find that the Projects emissions would exceed the threshold. Thus, the proposed Project would result in a potentially significant impact not previously identified. As a result, an EIR should be prepared for the Project, and additional mitigation should be considered and implemented where necessary, per CEQA guidelines. (3) The City's Sustainable Community Action Plan Cannot be Relied upon to Determine Project Significance As discussed above, the Greenhouse Gas Analysis relies on the Project's consistency with the City's Sustainable Community Action to determine that impacts would be less than significant. However, this is incorrect for two reasons: (1) the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan fails to include goals or targets beyond 2020, and (2) the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan does not include Project - specific measures. "Calculated: (8,000 -SF office space) _ (304-SF/employee) = 26 employees; Calculated: (95,945 -SF warehouse space) - (781-SF/employee) = 123 employees; See "BUILDING AREA PER EMPLOYEE BY BUSINESS TYPE." May 2008, City of Davis, available at: https://www.cityofdavis.org/home/showdocument?id=4579. 41 Calculated: (3,525.18 MT CO2e/year) / (149 service population) _ (23.66 MT CO2e/SP/year). 41 See SCAQMD (Dec. 5, 2008) Interim CEQA GHG Significance Threshold for Stationary Sources, Rules and Plans, httD://www.aamd.Rov/docs/default-source/ceaa/handbook/Rreenhouse-cases-(eh2)-ceaa-sienificance- thresholds/ghgboard synopsis.pdf?sfvrsn=2; see also SCAQMD (Oct. 2008) Draft Guidance Document — Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/cepa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cepa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf; SCAQMD (Sep. 28, 2010) Minutes for the GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group # 15, http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/cepa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-cepa-significance- thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-l5-minutes.pdf. 16 According to the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan, "This Plan identifies steps that Rancho Cucamonga can take to contribute towards a GHG reduction target that reduces emissions approximately 15 percent below 2008 levels by 2020. In total, existing actions, state programs, and the goals, policies, and actions identified in the Sustainable Community Action Plan will reduce GHG emissions in Rancho Cucamonga up to 16.9 percent by 2020."4z As you can see in the excerpt above, the Sustainable Community Action Plan includes steps for the City, but fails to include project -specific measures. In addition, the steps that it does include only account for reductions through 2020. As the proposed Project would not become operational until after 2020, the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan does not apply to the proposed Project. CEQA Guidelines § 15064(h)(3) permits lead agencies to find projects not cumulatively considerable when a project complies with an approved plan or mitigation program that, "provides specific requirements that will avoid or substantially lessen the cumulative problems within the geographic area in which the project is located ... [and] the lead agency should explain how implementing the particular requirements in the plan, regulation or program ensure that the project's incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable" (emphasis added)." Here, however, the City's Sustainable Community Action Plan fails to include any specific project -level binding requirements. Thus, the Project cannot rely on this plan to determine a less than significant GHG impact under CEQA. SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or " "Sustainable Community Action Plan." Rancho Cucamonga, April 2017, p. 22-23. 43 Natural Resources Agency (Dec. 2009) Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action ("2009 Final Statement of Reason"), pp. 14-17 (To qualify, the plan "must ... include binding requirements to address a cumulative problem[;] ... such plans contain specific requirements with respect to resources that are within the agency's jurisdiction to avoid or substantially lessen the agency's contributions to GHG emissions ...consistency with plans that are purely aspirational (i.e., those that include only unenforceable goals without mandatory reduction measures), and provide no assurance that emissions within the area governed by the plan will actually address the cumulative problem[;] ... by requiring that lead agencies draw a link between the project and the specific provisions of a binding plan or regulation, section 15064(h)(3) would ensure that cumulative effects of the project are actually addressed by the plan or regulation in question.") 17 otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. w Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Im. CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos South Coast Air Basin, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail 95.94 + 1000sgft ; 4.77 95,945.00 i 0 •----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- ParkingLot 79.00 = — — ;------------- Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 + ; i ------------------------------- _------------------------------ _----------------------------- T -------------- ------------------E--------------- General Office Building 8.00 1000sgft 0.00 8,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/11/2020 2/4/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/10/2020 2/14/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 1/26/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/23/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/23/2021 1/27/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 2/12/2020 2/5/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 3/11/2020 2/15/2020 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 2/24/2021 12/7/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 1/27/2021 1/2/2021 r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- - -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix HHD 0.03 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 1.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LDA �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDA r 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tblFleetMix OBUS 2.0270e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- OBUS ---------------------------------T-------------------------- i 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 95,940.00 95,945.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.18 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 1.05 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 1.05 :------------------------------ ---------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ IndoorWaterUseRate 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2020 •1 0.7988 I 3.0563 I 2.6085 I 5.1100e- I 0.1670 I 0.1581 I 0.3250 I 0.0635 I 0.1483 0.2118 � 0.0000 1 450.7156 1450.7156 I 0.0867 I 0.0000 1 452.8837 003 1 I I I I 1 1 I 1 I I ------------ I --J-------J-------------- I1 -------------------------------- J. J. J. J. J ....... .......I-------- 2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . .60 9200e -6400e- I 6.1800e- I 0.0000 21.3405 004 I 003 I 003 I 003 I 004 1 003 003 1 I I003 1 Maximum Maximum 0.7988 3.0563 2.6085 5.1100e- 0.1670 0.1581 0.3250 0.0635 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 450.7156 450.7156 0.0867 0.0000 452.8837 003 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 2020 •1 0.7988 I 3.0563 I 2.6085 I 5.1100e- I 0.1670 I 0.1581 I 0.3250 I 0.0635 I 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 1 450.7152 1450.7152 I 0.0867 I 0.0000 i 452.8833 003 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 2021 •1 0.0383 0.1273 0.1472 2.4000e- 1.9200e- 6.6400e- 8.5600e- 5.1000e- 6.1200e- 6.6400e- 0.0000 1 21.1860 21.1860 6.1800e- 0.0000 i 21.3404 I I I I I I I I � I I I 004 1 003 1 003 1 003 1 004 1 003 003 1 1 1 003 1 1 Maximum 0.7988 3.0563 2.6085 5.1100e- 0.1670 0.1581 0.3250 0.0635 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 450.7152 450.7152 0.0867 0.0000 452.8833 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Quarter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e 9-30-2020 0.7924 0.7924 4 10-1-2020 PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 0.1595 0.1595 Highest 1.2460 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 0.4917 0.3452 1.4050 6.1300e- 0.5473 0.0221 0.5694 0.1453 0.0219 0.1671 26.3675 2,026.405 2,052.772 1.9131 0.0322 2,110.196 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 0.9899 0.9899 2 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 0.7838 0.7838 3 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 0.7924 0.7924 4 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 1.2460 1.2460 5 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 0.1595 0.1595 Highest 1.2460 1.2460 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Area •1 0.4265 1 2.000Oe- 1 2.3500e- 1 0.0000 1 11.000Oe- I 1.000Oe- I 1 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 1 4.5400e- 14.5400e- I 1.000Oe- 1 0.0000 i 4.8400e- •1 1 005 1 003 1 1 1 005 1 005 1 1 005 005 . 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 I 003 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 Energy 0.0269 I 0.2448 I 0.2056 I 1.4700e- 1 I 0.0186 1 0.0186 I 1 0.0186 0.0186 � 0.0000 i 1,515.559 11,515.559 I 0.0567 1 0.0156 1,521.6113 I 1 I 003 1 1 I 1 I . 1 1 1 I 1 ........... J. J. J j. J. J. J. J ....... - .......1- - - - - - - J- J. J. ...... . 1- I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 Mobile 0.0383 I 0.1003 I 1.1970 14.6600e- 1 0.5473 13.5100e- I 0.5508 I 0.1453 1 3.2400e- 0.1485 0.0000 i 422.0813 1422.0813 18.7700e- 1 0.0000 i 422.3004 1 1 1 003 1 1 003 1 1 1 003 . 1 1 003 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 Waste •1 I I I 1 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 19.8160 1 0.0000 I 19.8160 I 1.1711 1 0.0000 49.0933 I I I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 Water •1 1 1 I 1 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 � 6.5515 1 88.7602 I 95.3117 I 0.6766 1 0.0167 117.1868 Total 0.4917 0.3452 1.4050 6.1300e- 0.5473 0.0221 0.5694 0.1453 0.0219 0.1671 26.3675 2,026.405 2,052.772 1.9131 0.0322 2,110.196 11 003 1 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.4265 i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- � 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 � 4.8400e- �� i 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 0.00 Energy •i 0.0269 i 0.2448 0.2056 i 1.4700e- 0.0186 i 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 i 1,515.559 1,515.559 i 0.0567 1 0.0156 1,521.6113 003 i i i i i • 1 Mobile •i 0.0383 i 0.1003 � 1.1970 i 4.6600e- � 0.5473 � 3.5100e- i 0.5508 � 0.1453 i 3.2400e- 0.1485 � 0.0000 i 422.0813 422.0813 i 8.7700e- 0.0000 422.3004 003 003 003 003 i Waste •i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 19.8160 i 0.0000 19.8160 i 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 0.00 0.00 Water •1 i � i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 6.5515 i 88.7602 95.3117 i 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 0.00 0.00 Total 0.4917 0.3452 1.4050 6.1300e- 0.5473 0.0221 0.5694 0.1453 0.0219 2,026.405 1.9131 0.0322 2,110.196 11 003 T-7773675 1 1'2,052.772 6 1 5 1 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 11/1/2020 11/28/2020 5: 20: +i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 11/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5: 5: + i 3 :Grading +Grading ;2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 8: + i 4 :Building Construction +Building Construction 12/15/2020 :1/1/2021 5: 230: + i 5 :Paving +Paving ;1/2/2021 :1/27/2021 5: 18: +i 6 •Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 12/7/2020 1/1/2021 5. 20, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Architectural Coating 'Air Compressors 1 11 6.001 78, 0.48 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------- ----------- ----------- Paving Rollers 2� 8.00 � r 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix .HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix 1HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- IHIHIDT I- ----------------A-------------- Building Construction i 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- THHDT �- ° Architectural Coating -------------- 1; i --------------------i----------4- 11.0 0 0.001 0.00:, --------- 14.70: --------------------------------' 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix T HHDT ---------------- -------------- T----------}----------*---------+----------- 0.0154 0.0162 --------- -------------+----------*-------- 33.9986 Paving 6; 15.00; 0.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 5.0200e- , 0.0000 , 5.0200e- , 7.6000e- , 0.0000 ; 7.6000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 •� 003 003 004 004 Off -Road •i 0.0331 , 0.3320 , 0.2175 , 3.9000e- , , 0.0166 , 0.0166 , , 0.0154 ; 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 , 33.9986 , 9.6000e- , 0.0000 1 34.2386 •� 004 003 i Total 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 5.0200e- 0.0166 0.0216 7.6000e- 0.0154 0.0162 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34.2386 004 003 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9000e- i 6.6200e- i 1.3700e- 2.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 1.1000e- 2.000Oe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 1.7451 1.7451 1.3000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7482 ; 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 004 i Off -Road •i 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 i 34.2385 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.7000e- 5.1000e- 5.6900e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4829 1.4829 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4840 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 8.6000e- 7.1300e- 7.0600e- 4.000Oe- 2.0500e- 3.000Oe- 2.0800e- 5.5000e- 3.000Oe- 5.8000e- 0.0000 3.2280 3.2280 1.7000e- 0.0000 3.2323 11 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 5.0200e- 0.0000 5.0200e- i 7.6000e- 0.0000 7.6000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off -Road •i 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 i 34.2385 i i i 004 . 003 i Total 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 5.0200e- 0.0166 0.0216 7.6000e- 0.0154 0.0162 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34.2385 004 003 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9000e- i 6.6200e- i 1.3700e- 2.00OOe- i 4.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 4.2000e- i 1.1000e- 2.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 1.7451 1.7451 1.3000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7482 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 004 i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0102 Worker •i 6.7000e- 5.1000e- 5.6900e- 2.00OOe- 1.6500e- 1.00OOe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.00OOe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4829 1.4829 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4840 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 0.0452 Total 8.6000e- 7.1300e- 7.0600e- 4.00OOe- 2.0500e- 3.00OOe- 2.0800e- 5.5000e- 3.00OOe- 5.8000e- 0.0000 3.2280 3.2280 1.7000e- 0.0000 3.2323 11 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0452 i 0.0000 i 0.0452 0.0248 i 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.00OOe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4253 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.00OOe- 0.0452 5.4900e- 0.0507 0.0248 5.0500e- 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 8.4253 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4252 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0102 0.1060 Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 1.5000e- i 1.7100e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4449 0.4449 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.4452 1.000Oe- 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.000Oe- 1.5000e- 1.7100e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4449 0.4449 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4452 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0452 i 0.0000 i 0.0452 0.0248 i 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4252 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 0.0452 5.4900e- 0.0507 0.0248 5.0500e- 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 8.4252 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 Worker •i 2.00OOe- i 1.5000e- i 1.7100e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4449 0.4449 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.4452 1.2000e- 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.00OOe- 1.5000e- 1.7100e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4449 0.4449 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4452 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0262 i 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 i 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 0.0262 5.0900e- 0.0313 0.0135 4.6900e- 0.0182 0.0000 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 9.7200e- Worker •i 2.7000e- i 2.1000e- i 2.2800e- 1.000Oe- i 6.6000e- 1.000Oe- 6.6000e- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.5932 0.5932 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.5936 0.0642 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.7000e- 2.1000e- 2.2800e- 1.0000e- 6.6000e- 1.000Oe- 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5932 0.5932 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5936 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 003 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 i 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 0.0262 5.0900e- 0.0313 0.0135 4.6900e- 0.0182 0.0000 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 Worker •i 2.7000e- i 2.1000e- i 2.2800e- 1.00OOe- i 6.6000e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.5932 0.5932 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.5936 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.7000e- 2.1000e- 2.2800e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5932 0.5932 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5936 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2427 i 2.1968 i 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 i 265.1934 265.1934 0.0647 i 0.0000 i 266.8109 003 Total 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1934 265.1934 0.0647 0.0000 266.8109 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 i Vendor •i 8.5300e- 0.2701 0.0681 6.4000e- 0.0159 1.3200e- 0.0172 4.5800e- 1.2600e- 5.8400e- � 0.0000 i 61.6267 61.6267 4.1100e- 0.0000 i 61.7295 i i � i � � i � � i 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.0285 0.0220 0.2433 7.000Oe- 0.0704 5.5000e- 0.0709 0.0187 5.000Oe- 0.0192 � 0.0000 i 63.3909 63.3909 1.8300e- 0.0000 i 63.4366 i i � i � � i � i 004 004 004 003 i 1.9292 Total 0.0371 0.2921 0.3114 1.3400e- 0.0862 1.8700e- 0.0881 0.0233 1.7600e-0.0250 0.0647 0.0000 125.0176 125.0176 5.9400e- 0.0000 125.1660 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.2427 i 2.1968 i 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1931 265.1931 0.0647 i 0.0000 i 266.8106 003 i Total 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1931 265.1931 0.0647 0.0000 266.8106 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •1 8.5300e- 0.2701 0.0681 6.4000e- 0.0159 1.3200e- 0.0172 4.5800e- 1.2600e- 5.8400e- � 0.0000 i 61.6267 61.6267 4.1100e- 0.0000 i 61.7295 i i � i � � i � � � i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 003------------- Worker •i 0.0285 0.0220 0.2433 7.00OOe- 0.0704 5.5000e- 0.0709 0.0187 5.00OOe- 0.0192 0.0000 i 63.3909 63.3909 1.8300e- 0.0000 i 63.4366 i i i i i 004 004 004 003 i 8.2900e- Total 0.0371 0.2921 0.3114 1.3400e- 0.0862 1.8700e- 0.0881 0.0233 1.7600e- 0.0250 0.0000 125.0176 125.0176 5.9400e- 0.0000 125.1660 005 004 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.00OOe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 1.1652 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.00OOe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 1.1652 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •i 3.000Oe- i 1.0700e- i 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 7.000Oe- 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.2671 0.2671 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.2675 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i 8.7200e- Worker •i 1.2000e- i 9.000Oe- i 9.8000e- 0.0000 i 3.1000e- 0.0000 3.1000e- i 8.000Oe- 0.0000 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.2679 0.2679 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.2680 1.000Oe- 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 i � � 005 Total 1.5000e- 1.1600e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 3.0007 0.0000 0.5356 11 004 003 003 004 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 1.1652 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 1.1652 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •i 3.00OOe- i 1.0700e- i 2.7000e- � 0.0000 i 7.00OOe- � 0.0000 � 7.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- � 0.0000 2.00OOe- � 0.0000 i 0.2671 � 0.2671 � 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.2675 �� 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Worker •i 1.2000e- i 9.00OOe- i 9.8000e- 0.0000 i 3.1000e- 0.0000 3.1000e- i 8.00OOe- 0.0000 8.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.2679 0.2679 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.2680 0.0122 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 i � � 005 Total 1.5000e- 1.1600e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5356 004 003 003 003 004 003 004 004 004 003 1 005 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0113 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 i 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 i 18.1668 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving :i 9.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 0.0122 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 18.1668 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Worker •i 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.000Oe- 1.4800e- 1.000Oe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.2915 1.2915 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.2924 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.000Oe- 1.4800e- 1.000Oe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0007 0.0000 1.2924 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 003 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0113 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 i 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 i 18.1668 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving :i 9.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 0.0122 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 18.1668 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.00OOe- 1.4800e- 1.00OOe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2915 1.2915 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2924 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.00OOe- 1.4800e- 1.00OOe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.00O7 0.0000 1.2924 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.4619 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 0.4642 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 2.4303 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- i 0.0160 i 0.0174 i 3.000Oe- i i 1.0500e- i 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 i 2.4256 1.9000e- i 0.0000 i 2.4303 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.000Oe- 1.1500e- 1.000Oe- 1.1600e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.0331 1.0331 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.0339 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.0000e- 1.1500e- 1.000Oe- 1.1600e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0331 1.0331 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0339 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.4619 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- i 0.0160 i 0.0174 i 3.000Oe- i i 1.0500e- i 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 i 2.4256 1.9000e- i 0.0000 i 2.4303 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 0.4642 0.0160 0.0174 3.000Oe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 2.4303 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Worker •i 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.00OOe- 1.1500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1600e- 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.0331 1.0331 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.0339 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.00OOe- 1.1500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1600e- 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0331 1.0331 3.00OOe- 0.0000 1.0339 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.0243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 0.1277 1.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.1279 i i i 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.0244 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1279 11 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- i 7.6000e- 9.1000e- i 0.0000 i i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 i 0.1277 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.1279 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0527 7.6000e- 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 0.0000 0.0527 11 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.0243 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- i 7.6000e- 9.1000e- i 0.0000 i i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 i 0.1277 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.1279 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.0244 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1279 11 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- i 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 6.00OOe- 0.0000 6.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0527 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.00OOe- 0.0000 6.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 0.0000 0.0527 11 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category 109.14 tons/yr 1,467,832 1,467,832 MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.0383 0.1003 i 1.1970 i 4.6600e- 0.5473 i 3.5100e- 0.5508 i 0.1453 i 3.2400e- 0.1485 0.0000 i 422.0813 422.0813 8.7700e- i 0.0000 422.3004 •� 003 003 003 . 003 i Unmitigated 0.0383 0.1003 1.1970 4.6600e- - 0.5473 3.5100e- • 0.5508 - 0.1453 3.2400e- 0.1485 0.0000 422.0813 • 422.0813 8.7700e- 0.0000 422.3004 003 003 003 003 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 40.00 � Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot ......................................------------ �e. �a Warehouse No Rail •••••••............... Building ••••••••••,---------- General Office ; 0.00 ; 100.74 ; 0.00 0.00 -------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- ; 100.74 100.74 ;----8.40 --- 8.40--- 1,367,836 -------- 99,996------- 1,367,836 ---------99,996---------- Total 109.14 109.14 109.14 1,467,832 1,467,832 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 4.4 Fleet Mix 40.00 � 40.-- i 0-- 0.-- .......Pa.ki:gLot........`---40_00----t- Refrigerated Warehouse -No 40.00 40.00 ? 40.00 --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 ..........:............r --------------------T- General Office Building 40.00 40.00 40.00 -------- -------- ------- ---------------- 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH Parking Lot 1.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000 0.000000 } I I I I I I I I I I Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 1.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000, 0.000000 } I I I I I I I I I I General Office Building 1.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •I I I I I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I I 11,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 Mitigated I I I I I I I I 11,249.067 I I 0I 0 I I 5 -----------•I rl I I I - ------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------------------------------------------- I I I I 1 • I I I '-------'-------'------- r....... Electricity •I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I-------1 I I 11,249.067 11,249.067 I 0.0516 I 0.0107 1,253.535 Unmitigated ; I I I I I I I 1 . I 0I 0 I I I $ •I I I I I ry I I I 1 • -- I I I -------I T------- NaturalGas •I I I I 0.0269 I 0.2448 I 0.2056 11.4700e- I I I I 0.0186 I I I 0.0186 I I I 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 I I I I 266.4921 1266.4921 15.1100e- 14.8900e- 268.0757 Mitigated 003 i i i 003 i 003 - - - - - - - - - - - • -------------- i--------------- --------------- }--------------+--------------I--------------- --------------- --------------- }--------------* --------------- --------------+--------------}--------------4---------------- - - - - - - - NaturalGas 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- - 0.0186 0.0186 - 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- - 4.8900e- 268.0757 Unmitigated 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office I 27760 •i 1.5000e- i 1.3600e- 1.1400e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4814 � 1.4814 i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- 1.4902 Building 004 003 003 005 I I 004 004 004 004 ; I 005 005 i I I I I • I Parking Lot i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Rail I '� I 1 I � I I 1 � � 1 I � • I '� I I I I I I I I 0.2448 • Refrigerated 14.96611e •i 0.0268 1 0.2434 1 0.2045 1 1.4600e- i 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 I 0.0185 r 0.0000 i 265.0107 1 265.0107 1 5.0800e- i 4.8600e- 266.5855 Warehouse -No i +006 003 i * i 003 003 Rail 0.0186 Total 0.0000 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- 268.0757 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- 4.8900e- 268.0757 003 003 003 003 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office I 27760 ■i 1.5000e- i 1.3600e- 1.1400e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- • 0.0000 i 1.4814 1.4814 i 3.000Oe- i 3.000Oe- I 1.4902 Building 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 ; i 005 005 Parking Lot i 0 �� 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 0.0000 t------�I i -------i- i-------i-------i- i- i -------i- *-------,------ � i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 4.96611e �i 0.0268 i 0.2434 1 0.2045 1 1.4600e- i 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 1 i 0.0185 I 0.0185 r 0.0000 i 265.0107 1 265.0107 1 5.0800e- i 4.8600e- 266.5855 I I .i i i i i i i i i r i i i i Warehouse -No I +006 ;� � � � 003 � � � � � I r i � � 003 � 003 Rail Total 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- 4.8900e- 268.0757 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Office 1 76160 ■1 24.2662 i 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 24.3530 Building 003 004 Parking Lot ■ ---------------- 11060 ■1 3.5240 i 1.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.5366 004 i 005 --------------------- 4i ------- i------- i-------- ------- Refrigerated 3.833e ;i 1,221.276 i 0.0504 i 0.0104 1,225.646 Warehouse -No i +006 8 0 Rail Total 1,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 0 j 5 j Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Office 76160 ■i 24.2662 i 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 24.3530 Building ;1 i 003 004 Lot -------- -------- 11060 ■i 3.5240 i 1.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.5366 004 005 i ---------i------- i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 3.833e m 1,221.276 1 0.0504 1 0.0104 1,225.646 Warehouse -No i +006 8 0 Rail Total 1,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 0 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.4265 i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.0000e- i 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.8400e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 -------------- +----------------------------- I--------------- --------------- I---------------I---------------I---------------I-------------- + - - - - - - - + + + Unmitigated 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- - 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0486 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating '� Consumer •i 0.3777 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 Products ------------- Landscaping •i 2.2000e- i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- '� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- 1.0007 0.0000 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 005 003 003 005 005 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 005 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0486 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.3777 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Landscaping 2.2000e- i 2.000Oe- i 2.3500e- i 0.0000 i i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- i 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.8400e- 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 11.0000e- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 95.3117 i 0.6766 0.0167 i 117.1868 Land Use Mgal MT/yr - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4---------------I---------------* - - - - - - - Unmitigated 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office 1.42187 / •1 9.4350 0.0467 i 1.1700e- i 10.9514 Building i 0.871469 :i 003 - J •r- Parking Lot - - - - - - - - - - - - -------J-------T ... .... 0/0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 --r------+i-------1-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 19.2289 / ;i 85.8767 i 0.6299 i 0.0155 106.2353 Warehouse -No i 0 Rail Total 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office i 1.42187/ •i 9.4350 0.0467 1.1700e- i 10.9514 Building i 0.871469 ;i i 003 •------------ ---- Parking Lot 0 / 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 --r------+i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 19.2289 / ;i 85.8767 0.6299 i 0.0155 106.2353 Warehouse -No i 0 Rail Total 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual CategoryNear 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 19.8160 i 1.1711 0.0000 1 49.0933 - - - - - - - - - - - %--------------+--------------}--------------* " " " " " " " Unmitigated 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I I Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 7.44 •1 1.5103 0.0893 0.0000 i 3.7416 Building •1--------I------- Parking Lot 0 -i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 .� i Refrigerated 90.18 pi 18.3057 i 1.0818 i 0.0000 45.3517 Warehouse -No Rail 7� Total 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 1 7.44 •i 1.5103 0.0893 0.0000 i 3.7416 Building •' i ' • -------- ------- Parking Lot 1 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 -----------t------4'------- -------- Refrigerated 1 90.18 ;1 18.3057 1 1.0818 i 0.0000 45.3517 Warehouse -No i Rail Total 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:24 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos South Coast Air Basin, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail 95.94 + 1000sgft ; 4.77 95,945.00 i 0 •---------- - - - - --------------_------------------------------_ ParkingLot 79.00 ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------------- Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 + ; i •------------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- T -------- - - - - -- ------------------E--------------- General Office Building 8.00 1000sgft 0.00 8,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/11/2020 2/4/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/10/2020 2/14/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 1/26/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/23/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/23/2021 1/27/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 2/12/2020 2/5/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 3/11/2020 2/15/2020 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 2/24/2021 12/7/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 1/27/2021 1/2/2021 r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- - -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix HHD 0.03 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 1.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LDA �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDA r 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tblFleetMix OBUS 2.0270e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- OBUS ---------------------------------T-------------------------- i 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 95,940.00 95,945.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.18 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 1.05 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 1.05 :------------------------------ ---------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ I ndoorWaterUse Rate 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 I Total PM2.5 PM2.5 JPM2.5-rotal I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 •i 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 i 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 0.0000 41218.651 i � i � i � � i 3 i 3 i i 0 -----------��-------------------------------- -------'--------------------------------------------- -------- ------- -------------- 2021 •i 51.0803 i 21.2487 i 21.4200 0.0429 i 0.8897 � 1.0626 i 1.9522 i 0.2391 1.0046 1.2437 0.0000 i 4,172.070 i 4,172.070 i 0.7183 i 0.0000 4,189.373 0 i 0 i 8 Maximum Maximum 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 0.0000 11 3 3 3 1 14,218.651 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 •i 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 i 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 1 0.0000 i 4,218.651 i i i i i 3 i 3 i i i 0 2021 •i 51.0803 i 21.2487 21.4200 i 0.0429 0.8897 1.0626 i 1.9522 0.2391 i 1.0046 1.2437 • 0.0000 i 4,172.070 4,172.070 0.7183 0.0000 4,189.373 0 i 0 8 Maximum 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 0.0000 4,218.651 11 3 3 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 i 1.7000e- 0.0188 i 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- i 0.0400 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 : 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 i 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 i i i i i ; 8 i 8 i i i 0 Mobile •i 0.2285 i 0.4895 � 7.2452 i 0.0270 � 3.0636 � 0.0193 i 3.0829 � 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 i 2,691.586 � 2,691.586 i 0.0565 � � 2,692.998 '� 6 i 6 i i i 3 Total 2.7135 1.8311 8.3908 0.0350 3.0636 0.1213 3.1849 0.8121 0.1198 0.9319 4,301.255 4,301.255 0.0874 0.0295 4,312.235 11 4 4 0 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 i 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i i i i 004 005 005 005 005 ■ 004 i ---- ----%i-------j------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j -------------------- --i------- -------------- -------*------- Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 003 i i i i i ■ 8 i 8 i i 1 0 -----------%i------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ------- ---------------+-------i------- --------------*------- Mobile 0.2285 i 0.4895 7.2452 i 0.0270 3.0636 0.0193 i 3.0829 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 � i 2,691.586 2,691.586 i 0.0565 2,692.998 i i i i i i i i ■ 6 6 i 3 Total 2.7135 1.8311 8.3908 0.0350 3.0636 0.1213 3.1849 0.8121 0.1198 0.9319 4,301.255 4,301.255 0.0874 0.0295 4,312.235 11 4 4 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1/1/2021 5, 20 - 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition ! 1/1/2020 :1/28/2020 5: 20: A i 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A i 3 •Grading +Grading !2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 : 5 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 230: A i 5 :Paving +Paving !1/2/2021 :1/27/2021 : 5 18: + I 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 12/7/2020 1/1/2021 5, 20 - Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Architectural Coating 'Air Compressors 1 11 6.001 78, 0.48 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------- ----------- ----------- Paving Rollers 2� 8.00 � r 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix .HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix 1HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- IHIHIDT ----------------° �- Building Construction i -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70: ------------------------�---------- 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix I -------- THHDT �- ° Architectural Coating -------------- 1; i --------------------i----------4- 11.0 0 0.001 0.00:, --------- 14.70: --------------------------------' 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix T HHDT ---------------- -------------- T----------}----------*---------+----------- 0.0760 1.5419 --------- -------------+----------*-------- Paving 6; 15.00; 0.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 0.5020 , 0.0000 , 0.5020 , 0.0760 , 0.0000 ; 0.0760 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 , 33.2010 , 21.7532 , 0.0388 , , 1.6587 , 1.6587 , , 1.5419 ; 1.5419 :-3-,747.704 , 3,747.704 , 1.0580 , 1 3,774.153 9 i 9 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0183 i 0.6408 i 0.1333 1.7900e- i 0.0402 � 2.0700e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 1.9800e- 0.0130 i 193.7520 � 193.7520 � 0.0137 i i 194.0946 003 003 003 i %--------------------------------------------'-------------------------------------F -------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 1.7200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 171.5755 � 171.5755 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 33.2010 Total 0.0856 0.6863 0.7446 3.5100e- 0.2078 3.3500e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1600e-0.0586 3,747.704 1.0580 365.3274 365.3274 0.0187 365.7937 003 003 003 9 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.5020 0.0000 0.5020 i 0.0760 0.0000 0.0760 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 i 33.2010 i 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 i 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 i i 3,774.153 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 0.0000 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0183 i 0.6408 i 0.1333 1.7900e- i 0.0402 � 2.0700e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 1.9800e- 0.0130 i 193.7520 � 193.7520 � 0.0137 i i 194.0946 � 003 003 003 i ............. Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 6 6 i 5 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 � 1.7200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 171.5755 � 171.5755 � 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 42.4173 Total 0.0856 0.6863 0.7446 3.5100e- 0.2078 3.3500e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1600e- 0.0586 1.1918 365.3274 365.3274 0.0187 365.7937 003 003 003 6 5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 i 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 , , 1 19 i i i 6 6 i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 i i i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0807 i 0.0546 i 0.7336 2.0700e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- i i 206.0389 003 003 003 003 i 21.5136 Total 0.0807 0.0546 0.7336 2.0700e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- 206.0389 003 003 6 003 5 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 18.0663 i 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 i i i 6 6 i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 0.0000 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0807 i 0.0546 i 0.7336 2.0700e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- i i 206.0389 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0807 0.0546 0.7336 2.0700e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 2,895.710 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- 206.0389 003 003 1 1'2,872.485 1 003 6 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 i 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i 1 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1'2,872.485 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 � 1.7200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 171.5755 � 171.5755 � 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 9 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0673 0.0455 0.6114 1.7200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 2,895.710 171.5755 171.5755 4.9400e- 171.6991 11 003 003 1 1 003 6 j 003 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 i 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� i i i i i i i i • 1 i 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 16.8485 0.0269 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 � 1.7200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 171.5755 � 171.5755 � 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 1.1171 Total 0.0673 0.0455 0.6114 1.7200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 171.5755 171.5755 4.9400e- 171.6991 003 1 003 5 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total Vendor •i 0.0730 i 2.3171 i 0.5636 5.6100e- i 0.1408 0.0115 0.1522 i 0.0405 0.0110 0.0515 :-6-00.1409 600.1409 0.0384 601.1012 003 Worker •i 0.2512 i 0.1698 i 2.2824 6.4300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 i 640.5483 640.5483 0.0185 i i 641.0098 003 003 003Ei Total 0.3242 2.4869 2.8461 0.0120 0.7667 0.0162 0.7830 0.2065 0.0154 0.2219 1,240.689 1,240.689 0.0569 1,242.111 1 1 5 2 2 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 i 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 Vendor •1 0.0730 i 2.3171 i 0.5636 5.6100e- i 0.1408 0.0115 0.1522 i 0.0405 0.0110 0.0515 i 600.1409 600.1409 0.0384 i i 601.1012 '� 003 Worker •i 0.2512 i 0.1698 i 2.2824 6.4300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 640.5483 640.5483 0.0185 i i 641.0098 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3242 2.4869 2.8461 0.0120 0.7667 0.0162 0.7830 0.2065 0.0154 0.2219 2,568.764 1,240.689 1,240.689 0.0569 1,242.111 9 9 3 2 2 0 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 i 17.4321 i 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i i 2,568.764 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 ------------------------------------------'----------------------- --+ --------------'--------------- � Vendor •1 0.0619 2.1069 0.5116 5.5700e 0.1408 4.3000e 0.1451 0.0405 4.1100e 0.0446 595.6362 0.0368 596.5571 � 003 003 003 i 1.9009 Worker •i 0.2344 i 0.1529 i 2.1026 6.2200e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 :-6-1-9.8630 619.8630 0.0167 i i 620.2807 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.2963 2.2597 2.6142 0.0118 0.7667 8.9300e- 0.7757 0.2065 8.3800e-0.2149 2,568.764 1,215.499 1,215.499 0.0535 1,216.837 003 9 9 003 3 3 3 8 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 i 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i 2,568.764 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 Vendor •1 0.0619 i 2.1069 i 0.5116 5.5700e- i 0.1408 4.3000e- 0.1451 i 0.0405 4.1100e- 0.0446 i 595.6362 595.6362 0.0368 i i 596.5571 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2344 i 0.1529 i 2.1026 6.2200e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 619.8630 619.8630 0.0167 i i 620.2807 003 003 003 i 12.9191 Total 0.2963 2.2597 2.6142 0.0118 0.7667 8.9300e- 0.7757 0.2065 8.3800e-0.2149 2,207.210 0.7139 1,215.499 1,215.499 0.0535 1,216.837 j j j 003 003 9 3 3 8 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 i 12.9191 i 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i i 2,225.057 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 j j j j 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0628 i 0.0410 i 0.5632 1.6700e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- i i 166.1466 003 003 003 003 i 14.6532 Total 0.0628 0.0410 0.5632 1.6700e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- 166.1466 003 003 9 003 3 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 i 12.9191 i 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 i 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i i 2,225.057 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0628 i 0.0410 i 0.5632 1.6700e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- i i 166.1466 003 003 003 003 i 48.8603 Total 0.0628 0.0410 0.5632 1.6700e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 281.4481 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- 11 166.1466 003 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0493 i 0.0334 i 0.4483 1.2600e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- i i 125.9127 003 004 004 003 i 1.6838 Total 0.0493 0.0334 0.4483 1.2600e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 0.0218 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- 125.9127 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 i 2.9700e- i i 0.1109 i 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0493 i 0.0334 i 0.4483 1.2600e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- i i 125.9127 003 004 004 003 i 48.8370 Total 0.0493 0.0334 0.4483 1.2600e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- 11 125.9127 003 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 � 2.9700e- i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 � i 281.4481 � 281.4481 � 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0460 i 0.0300 i 0.4130 � 1.2200e- i 0.1230 � 9.1000e- � 0.1239 i 0.0326 � 8.4000e- 0.0335 � i 121.7588 � 121.7588 � 3.2800e- i i 121.8409 003 004 004 003 i 1.5268 Total 0.0460 0.0300 0.4130 1.2200e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 0.0193 121.7588 121.7588 3.2800e- 121.8409 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 i 2.9700e- 0.0941 i 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0460 i 0.0300 i 0.4130 1.2200e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 :-1-2-1.7588 121.7588 3.2800e- i i 121.8409 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0460 0.0300 0.4130 1.2200e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 121.7588 121.7588 3.28077 121.8409 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 109.14 109.14 1,467,832 1,467,832 Ib/day Mitigated •i 0.2285 i 0.4895 i 7.2452 � 0.0270 i 3.0636 i 0.0193 3.0829 i 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 2,691.586 � 2,691.586 0.0565 i i 2,692.998 '� i i i i i i i i • 6 i 6 i i i 3 Unmitigated 0.2285 0.4895 7.2452 0.0270 3.0636 0.0193 3.0829 0.8121 0.0178 0.8299 2,691.586 - 2,691.586 - 0.0565 - 2,692.998 6 6 3 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 40.00 � Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot ......................................------------ ;e. �a Warehouse -No Rail ...................... Building ..........+---------- General Office ; 0.00 ; 100.74 ; 0.00 0.00 -------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- ; 100.74 100.74 ;----8.40 --- 8.40--- 1,367,836 -------- 99,996------- 1,367,836 ---------99,996---------- Total 109.14 109.14 109.14 1,467,832 1,467,832 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 4.4 Fleet Mix 40.00 � 40.-- i 0-- 0.-- .......Pa.ki:gLot........`---40_00----t- Refrigerated Warehouse -No 40.00 40.00 ? 40.00 --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 ..........:............r --------------------T- General Office Building 40.00 40.00 40.00 -------- -------- ------- ---------------- 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH Parking Lot 1.000000+ 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.0000001 0.00000( r Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 1.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000, 0.00000( r General Office Building 1.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.00000( 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 8.0500e- i i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 11,609.628 1 0.0309 i 0.0295 1 1,619.194 Mitigated ;i 003 . i 8 1 8 1 i 0 NaturalGas 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0500e- - 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 - 1,609.628 0.0309 - 0.0295 1,619.194 Unmitigated 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I IPM2.5Total INBio-CO2 I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I i 76.0548 •I 8.2000e- 17.4600e- 16.2600e- 14.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 15.7000e- I 15.7000e- 5.7000e- I 8.9476 I 8.9476 I 1.7000e- I 1.6000e- i 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 ; I I I 004 � 004 � I � I I I I I I I 1 • I I 1 I---------�-------'-------------------------------------------------------- 1------------------------------ I I I I I I I I 1- I I I Parking Lot 0 •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Refri erated • I 'i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i--------t-------i-------i-------i-------i------- Refrigerated Refri 13605.8 0.1467 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 0.1014 0.1014------1 •I 1 1 1 r 11,600.681 1 1,600.681 1 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 Warehouse -No i ;I 1 1 1 003 1 ' 11 1 2 Rail Total 1.3414 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 003 8 8 8 8 0 0 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 10.0760548■I 8.2000e- 17.4600e- 16.2600e- 14.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 15.7000e- I 15.7000e- 5.7000e- • I 8.9476 I 8.9476 I 1.7000e- I 1.6000e- 1 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 ; i I 1 004 1 004 I I I I I I I 1 • I I I t �1 *------- Parking Lot I I I I I I I 1 , 1 I I I 0 .1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 • I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- - - Refri erated 13.6058 �i 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r i 1,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 Warehouse -No 1 ;1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 } I 1 I 1 I 003 I 2 I 1 I I Rail Total 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 11 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i 004 i i 005 005 005 i 005 . 004 i Unmitigated 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 - 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 � Coating Consumer •1 2.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- � i 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- � 0.0427 i � i i � i � i � i � 003 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 2.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i i i i i i Products '� � � � � � � � � . � � � � i Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- T-0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i � i i 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:26 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos South Coast Air Basin, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail 95.94 + 1000sgft ; 4.77 95,945.00 i 0 •---------- - - - - --------------_------------------------------_ ParkingLot 79.00 ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------------- Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 + ; i •------------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- T -------- - - - - -- ------------------E--------------- General Office Building 8.00 1000sgft 0.00 8,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------------------------- tblConstruction Phase -------------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/11/2020 2/4/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/10/2020 2/14/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 1/26/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 3/23/2021 1/1/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseEndDate + 2/23/2021 1/27/2021 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 2/12/2020 2/5/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 3/11/2020 2/15/2020 r tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate r 2/24/2021 12/7/2020 r tblConstruction Phase PhaseStartDate + 1/27/2021 1/2/2021 r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- - -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r •-----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------HHD r 0.03 ------------t----------- 0.00 ----------- r tblFleetMix HHD 0.03 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter tblFleetMix LDA 0.55 1.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LDA �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDA r 0.55 1.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT1 r 0.04 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LDT2 r 0.20 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD 0.02 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter tblFleetMix OBUS 2.0270e-003 0.00 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- OBUS ---------------------------------T-------------------------- i 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet } 95,940.00 95,945.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 0.18 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 1.05 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 1.05 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 1.05 :------------------------------ ---------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ I ndoorWaterUse Rate 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 •i 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 i 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.1974 0.0000 i4,154.8115 i i � i � � i � 7 i 7 ---- ---- ------- j ------- j ------- J- ------ -------'-------i-------i-------i------------------------------j-------j-------j--------------- 2021 i 51.1120 i 21.2617 i 21.2385 � 0.0423 i 0.8897 � 1.0627 i 1.9524 i 0.2391 1.0047 1.2439 0.0000 i 4,109.795 i 4,109.795 i 0.7181 i 0.0000 4,127.130 6 i 6 i i i 6 Maximum Maximum 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.19740.0000 4,154.811 4,154.811 7 7 7 5 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Year Ib/day Ib/day 2020 •i 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 i 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.1974 0.0000 i4,154.8115 i i i i i 7 i 7 2021 •i 51.1120 i 21.2617 21.2385 i 0.0423 0.8897 1.0627 i 1.9524 0.2391 i 1.0047 1.2439 0.0000 i 4,109.795 4,109.795 i 0.7181 0.0000 i 4,127.130 6 6 i 5 Maximum 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.1974 0.0000 4,154.811 7 7 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 i 1.7000e- 0.0188 i 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- i 0.0400 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 : 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 i 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 i i i i i ; 8 i 8 i i i 0 Mobile •i 0.2116 i 0.5349 � 6.3736 i 0.0252 � 3.0636 � 0.0193 i 3.0829 � 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 i 2,518.504 � 2,518.504 i 0.0522 � � 2,519.808 '� 5 i 5 i i i 6 Total 2.6966 1.8764 7.5191 0.0333 3.0636 0.1213 3.1849 0.8121 0.1198 0.9319 4,128.173 4,128.173 0.0831 0.0295 4,139.045 11 3 3 1 14,139.045 2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 i 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i i i i 004 005 005 005 005 ■ 004 i ---- ----%i-------j------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j ------- j -------------------- --i------- -------------- -------*------- Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 003 i i i i i ■ 8 i 8 i i 1 0 -----------%i------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ------- ---------------+-------i------- --------------*------- Mobile 0.2116 i 0.5349 6.3736 i 0.0252 3.0636 0.0193 i 3.0829 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 � i 2,518.504 2,518.504 i 0.0522 2,519.808 i i i i i i i i ■ 5 5 i 6 Total 2.6966 1.8764 7.5191 0.0333 3.0636 0.1213 3.1849 0.8121 0.1198 0.9319 4,128.173 4,128.173 0.0831 0.0295 4,139.045 11 3 3 2 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1/1/2021 5, 20 - 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition ! 1/1/2020 :1/28/2020 5: 20: A i 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A i 3 •Grading +Grading !2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 : 5 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 230: A i 5 :Paving +Paving !1/2/2021 :1/27/2021 : 5 18: + I 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating 12/7/2020 1/1/2021 5, 20 - Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Architectural Coating 'Air Compressors 1 11 6.001 78, 0.48 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------- ----------- ----------- Paving Rollers 2� 8.00 � r 80 0.38 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix .HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix 1HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- IHIHIDT ----------------° �- Building Construction i -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70: ------------------------�---------- 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix I -------- THHDT �- ° Architectural Coating -------------- 1; i --------------------i----------4- 11.0 0 0.001 0.00:, --------- 14.70: --------------------------------' 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix T HHDT ---------------- -------------- T----------}----------*---------+----------- 0.0760 1.5419 --------- -------------+----------*-------- Paving 6; 15.00; 0.00; 0.00; 14.70; 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 0.5020 , 0.0000 , 0.5020 , 0.0760 , 0.0000 ; 0.0760 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 , 33.2010 , 21.7532 , 0.0388 , , 1.6587 , 1.6587 , , 1.5419 ; 1.5419 :-3-,747.704 , 3,747.704 , 1.0580 , 1 3,774.153 9 i 9 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0188 i 0.6492 i 0.1423 1.7600e- i 0.0402 � 2.1100e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 2.0100e- 0.0130 i 190.4429 � 190.4429 � 0.0142 i i 190.7987 003 003 003 i %--------------------------------------------'-------------------------------------� -------------'--------------� 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 i 33.2010 Total 0.0928 0.6992 0.6967 3.3800e- 0.2078 3.3900e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1900e- 0.0587 1.0580 351.3706 351.3706 0.0189 351.8422 003 003 003 9 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.5020 0.0000 0.5020 i 0.0760 0.0000 0.0760 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 i 33.2010 i 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 i 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 i i 3,774.153 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 0.0000 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0188 i 0.6492 i 0.1423 1.7600e- i 0.0402 � 2.1100e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 2.0100e- 0.0130 i 190.4429 � 190.4429 � 0.0142 i i 190.7987 � 003 003 003 i ............. Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 6 6 i 5 1Worker 00740 0.0500 0.5544 1.6200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 16.0435 003 003 003 003 i 42.4173 Total 0.0928 0.6992 0.6967 3.3800e- 0.2078 3.3900e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1900e- 0.0587 1.1918 351.3706 351.3706 0.0189 351.8422 003 003 003 6 5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 i 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 , , 1 19 i i i 6 6 i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0888 i 0.0600 i 0.6653 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- i i 193.2522 003 003 003 003 i 21.5136 Total 0.0888 0.0600 0.6653 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- 193.2522 003 003 6 003 5 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 18.0663 i 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 6 i 6 i i i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 0.0000 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0888 i 0.0600 i 0.6653 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- i i 193.2522 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0888 0.0600 0.6653 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 2,895.710 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- 193.2522 003 003 1 1'2,872.485 1 003 6 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 i 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 1 i 1 i i i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1'2,872.485 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 1 i 1 i 6 Total Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 i 16.0530 Total 0.0740 0.0500 0.5544 1.6200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- 161.0435 003 003 1 003 6 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 i 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 1 i 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 19.1860 16.8485 Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 i 1.1171 Total 0.0740 0.0500 0.5544 1.6200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- 161.0435 003 1 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Vendor •1 0.0764 i 2.3162 i 0.6245 5.4600e- i 0.1408 0.0116 0.1524 i 0.0405 0.0111 0.0517 i 583.8303 583.8303 0.0411 584.8566 '� 003 Worker •i 0.2763 i 0.1865 i 2.0697 6.0300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 600.7967 600.7967 0.0173 i i 601.2291 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3527 2.5027 2.6942 0.0115 0.7667 0.0164 0.7831 0.2065 0.0155 0.2221 2,568.634 1,184.627 1,184.627 0.0583 7,186.085 1 1 5 0 0 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 i 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Vendor •1 0.0764 i 2.3162 i 0.6245 5.4600e- i 0.1408 0.0116 0.1524 i 0.0405 0.0111 0.0517 i 583.8303 583.8303 0.0411 i i 584.8566 '� 003 Worker •i 0.2763 i 0.1865 i 2.0697 6.0300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 600.7967 600.7967 0.0173 i i 601.2291 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3527 2.5027 2.6942 0.0115 0.7667 0.0164 0.7831 0.2065 0.0155 0.2221 2,568.764 1,184.627 1,184.627 0.0583 7,186.085 9 9 3 0 0 7 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i 2,568.764 i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Vendor •1 0.0650 i 2.1019 i 0.5687 5.4200e- i 0.1408 4.4400e- 0.1452 i 0.0405 4.2400e- 0.0448 579.4223 579.4223 0.0394 i i 580.4064 003 003 003 i 1.9009 Worker •i 0.2583 i 0.1679 i 1.9033 5.8300e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 581.3647 581.3647 0.0156 i i 581.7556 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3233 2.2698 2.4719 0.0113 0.7667 9.0700e- 0.7758 0.2065 8.5100e- 0.2150 2,568.764 1,160.787 1,160.787 0.0550 1,162.162 003 9 9 003 3 0 0 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 i 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i 2;568.764 i i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Vendor •1 0.0650 i 2.1019 i 0.5687 � 5.4200e- i 0.1408 � 4.4400e- � 0.1452 i 0.0405 � 4.2400e- 0.0448 � i 579.4223 � 579.4223 � 0.0394 i i 580.4064 '� 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2583 i 0.1679 i 1.9033 5.8300e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 581.3647 581.3647 0.0156 i i 581.7556 003 003 003 i 12.9191 Total 0.3233 2.2698 2.4719 0.0113 0.7667 9.0700e- 0.7758 0.2065 8.5100e- 0.2150 0.7139 1,160.787 1,160.787 0.0550 1,162.162 003 003 9 0 0 0 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i 2,225.057 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0692 i 0.0450 i 0.5098 1.5600e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- i i 155.8274 003 003 003 003 i 14.6532 Total 0.0692 0.0450 0.5098 1.5600e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- 155.8274 003 003 9 003 3 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 i 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i 2,225.057 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0692 i 0.0450 i 0.5098 1.5600e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- i i 155.8274 003 003 003 003 i 48.8603 Total 0.0692 0.0450 0.5098 1.5600e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 281.4481 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- 155.8274 003 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •1 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 -----------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------ -------------'--------------�------- Worker •i 0.0543 i 0.0366 i 0.4065 1.1800e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- i i 118.0986 003 004 004 003 i 1.6838 Total 0.0543 0.0366 0.4065 1.1800e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 0.0218 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- 118.0986 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 i 2.9700e- 0.1109 i 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 -----------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------ -------------'--------------�------- Worker •i 0.0543 i 0.0366 i 0.4065 1.1800e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- i i 118.0986 003 004 004 003 i 48.8370 Total 0.0543 0.0366 0.4065 1.1800e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- 11 118.0986 003 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 � 2.9700e- i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 � i 281.4481 � 281.4481 � 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0507 i 0.0330 i 0.3739 1.1500e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 � 114.1966 3.0700e- i i 114.2734 003 004 004 003 i 1.5268 Total 0.0507 0.0330 0.3739 1.1500e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 0.0193 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- 114.2734 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 i 2.9700e- i � 0.0941 i 0.0941 � i 0.0941 � 0.0941 � 0.0000 i 281.4481 i 281.4481 � 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0507 i 0.0330 i 0.3739 1.1500e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 � 114.1966 3.0700e- i i 114.2734 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0507 0.0330 0.3739 1.1500e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- 114.2734 003 004 004 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 109.14 109.14 1,467,832 1,467,832 Ib/day Mitigated •i 0.2116 i 0.5349 6.3736 � 0.0252 i 3.0636 i 0.0193 3.0829 i 0.8121 i 0.0178 0.8299 2,518.504 i 2,518.504 � 0.0522 i i 2,519.808 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 6 Unmitigated 0.2116 0.5349 6.3736 0.0252 3.0636 0.0193 3.0829 0.8121 0.0178 0.8299 2,518.504 - 2,518.504 - 0.0522 2,519.808 5 5 6 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 40.00 � Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Parking Lot .....................................------------- Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail ...................... Building ..........+----------- General Office ; 0.00 ; 100.74 ; 0.00 0.00 -------------------- ; 100.74 100.74 ;----8.40 --- 8.40--- -----------------------:-------------------------- 1,367,836 -------- 99,996------- 1,367,836 ---------99,996---------- Total 109.14 109.14 109.14 1,467,832 1,467,832 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by 4.4 Fleet Mix 40.00 � 40.-- i 0-- 0.-- .......Pa.ki:gLot........`---40_00----t- Refrigerated Warehouse -No 40.00 40.00 ? 40.00 --- --0-------0-----------0------- 59.00 0 00 T 41.00 92 5 3 ..........:............r --------------------T- General Office Building 40.00 40.00 40.00 -------- -------- ------- ---------------- 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH Parking Lot 1.000000+ 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.0000001 0.00000( r Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 1.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000, 0.00000( r General Office Building 1.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.00000( 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 8.0500e- i i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 11,609.628 1 0.0309 i 0.0295 1 1,619.194 Mitigated ;i 003 . i 8 1 8 1 i 0 NaturalGas 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0500e- - 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 - 1,609.628 0.0309 - 0.0295 1,619.194 Unmitigated 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I i 76.0548 •1 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 1 6.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- 8.9476 1 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- i 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 . I I 1 004 � 004 � I � I I I I I I I 1 • I I 1 1---------�-------'-------------------------------------------------------- 1------------------------------ I I I I I I I I 1- I I I Parking Lot 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I I Refri erated • t ------4I i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------*-------t-------1 i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 13605.8 •I 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r 11,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 1 Warehouse -No ;1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 r I 1 I I I 003 1 2 Rail Total 1.3414 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 003 8 8 8 8 0 0 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 10.0760548■I 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 16.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- • 1 8.9476 I 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- 1 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 ; i I 1 004 1 004 I I I I I I I 1 • I I I t �1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I *------- Parking Lot , 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- - - Refri erated 13.6058 �i 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r i 1,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 Warehouse -No 1 ;1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 } I 1 I 1 I 003 I 2 I 1 I I Rail Total 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 11 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i 004 i i 005 005 005 i 005 . 004 i Unmitigated 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 - 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 � Coating Consumer •1 2.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- � i 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- � 0.0427 i � i i � i � i � i � 003 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 2.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i i i i i i Products '� � � � � � � � � . � � � � i Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- T-0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i � i i 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 32 Date: 3/26/2020 1:25 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Autos - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks South Coast Air Basin, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 8.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 8,000.00 i 0 ------------------------------- _------------------------------ _------------------------------ Refrigerated Warehouse Rail 95.94 =----------------------i------------- ------- 1000sgft 4.77 95,945.00 -+ 0 -No + ; ------------------------------- _------------------------------ _----------------------------- T -------------- ------------------E--------------- Parking Lot 79.00 Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 ----------------------------_---------------- ------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 1 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r tblFleetMix + LDT1 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.16 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LHD1 �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.9320e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 95,940.00 95,945.00 ----------------------------- tblLandUse Y ---------------------------- LotAcreage �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 0.18 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 0.69 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 0.69 -------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ IndoorWaterUSeRate ------------------------------ 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2020 •1 0.7988 1 3.0563 1 2.6085 1 5.1100e- 1 0.1670 1 0.1581 1 0.3250 1 0.0635 1 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 1 450.7156 1 450.7156 1 0.0867 1 0.0000 452.8837 003 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1- 1 I 1 2021 •1 0.0383 0.1273 0.1472 2.4000e- 1.9200e- 6.6400e- 8.5600e- 5.1000e- 6.1200e- 6.6400e- 0.0000 1 21.1860 21.1860 6.1800e- 0.0000 21.3405 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 004 1 003 I 003 1 003 I 004 I 003 003 1 1 I 003 1 I 1 1 1 004 1 003 1 003 1 003 1 004 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 I Maximum 0.7988 3.0563 2.6085 5.1100e- 0.1670 0.1581 0.3250 0.0635 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 450.7156 450.7156 0.0867 0.0000 452.8837 11 11 003 003 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year tons/yr MT/yr I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 2020 •1 0.7988 I 3.0563 I 2.6085 15.1100e- 1 0.1670 I 0.1581 1 0.3250 I 0.0635 1 0.1483 0.2118 � 0.0000 1 450.7152 1450.7152 I 0.0867 1 0.0000 1 452.8833 003 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I 1 0.00 1 I I I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 2021 0.0383 1 0.1273 I 0.1472 12.4000e- 1 1.9200e- 16.6400e- 1 8.5600e- 15.1000e- 16.1200e- 6.6400e- � 0.0000 i 21.1860 I 21.1860 16.1800e- 1 0.0000 i 21.3404 1 1 1 004 1 003 1 003 1 003 1 004 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 I 0.00 Maximum 0.7988 3.0563 2.6085 5.1100e- 0.1670 0.1581 0.3250 0.0635 0.1483 0.2118 0.0000 450.7152 450.7152 0.0867 0.0000 452.8833 11 003 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2020 3-31-2020 0.9899 0.9899 2 4-1-2020 6-30-2020 0.7838 0.7838 3 7-1-2020 9-30-2020 0.7924 0.7924 4 10-1-2020 12-31-2020 1.2460 1.2460 5 1-1-2021 3-31-2021 0.1595 0.1595 Highest 1.2460 1.2460 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.4265 i 2.000Oe- i 2.3500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 i 4.5400e- i 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 � 4.8400e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 Energy •i 0.0269 i 0.2448 i 0.2056 i 1.4700e- 0.0186 i 0.0186 i i 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 i 1,515.559 1,515.559 i 0.0567 0.0156 11,521.6113 003 i i i i i 1 i 1 Mobile •1 0.1480 i 4.3565 i 1.1557 0.0144 0.4237 0.0259 i 0.4496 i 0.1195 i 0.0248 0.1443 0.0000 1 1,397.330 1,397.330 i 0.0736 0.0000 1,399.170 4 i 4 i i i 3 Waste •i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 19.8160 i 0.0000 i 19.8160 i 1.1711 i 0.0000 49.0933 Water •1 i � � i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 6.5515 i 88.7602 i 95.3117 i 0.6766 i 0.0167 117.1868 Total 0.6014 4.6013 1.3636 0.0158 0.4237 0.0445 0.4682 0.1195 0.0434 3,001.654 1.9780 0.0322 3,087.066 11 F7773675 1 17,028.021 7 1 4 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 0.4265 i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- � 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- � 0.0000 � 4.8400e- �� i 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 Energy •i 0.0269 i 0.2448 0.2056 i 1.4700e- 0.0186 i 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 i 1,515.559 1,515.559 i 0.0567 1 0.0156 1,521.6113 003 i i i i i • 1 Mobile •i 0.1480 i 4.3565 1.1557 i 0.0144 0.4237 0.0259 i 0.4496 0.1195 i 0.0248 0.1443 0.0000 i 1,397.330 1,397.330 i 0.0736 0.0000 1,399.170 '� i i i i i i i i • 4 i 4 i i i 3 T Waste •1 i � i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.8160 0.0000 19.8160 i 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 0.00 0.00 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 6.5515 i 88.7602 95.3117 i 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 0.00 0.00 Total 0.6014 4.6013 1.3636 0.0158 0.4237 0.0445 0.4682 0.1195 0.0434 0.1629 26.3675 3,001.654 3,028.021 1.9780 0.0322 3,087.066 1 7 4 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 11/1/2020 11/28/2020 5: 20: +i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 11/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5: 5: + i 3 :Grading +Grading ;2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 5: 8: + i 4 :Building Construction +Building Construction 12/15/2020 :1/1/2021 5: 230: +i 5 •Architectural Coating !Architectural Coating 112/7/2020 :1/1/2021 5: 20: +i 6 •Paving :Paving 1/2/2021 1/27/2021 5. 18, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 21 8.001 80, 0.38 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix 1HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------A-------------- I- Building Construction : 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- THHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i4----------- 0.001 , 0.00: ----------4 ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix - - EHHDT 0.0216 7.6000e- i 0.0162 f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 11.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 5.0200e- , 0.0000 , 5.0200e- , 7.6000e- , 0.0000 ; 7.6000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 •� 003 003 004 004 Off -Road •i 0.0331 , 0.3320 , 0.2175 , 3.9000e- , , 0.0166 , 0.0166 , , 0.0154 ; 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 , 33.9986 , 9.6000e- , 0.0000 1 34.2386 •� 004 003 i Total 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 5.0200e- 0.0166 0.0216 7.6000e- 0.0154 0.0162 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34.2386 004 003 004 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9000e- i 6.6200e- i 1.3700e- 2.000Oe- i 4.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 4.2000e- i 1.1000e- 2.000Oe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 1.7451 1.7451 1.3000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7482 ; 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 004 i Off -Road •i 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 i 34.2385 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 6.7000e- 5.1000e- 5.6900e- 2.000Oe- 1.6500e- 1.000Oe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.000Oe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4829 1.4829 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4840 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 8.6000e- 7.1300e- 7.0600e- 4.000Oe- 2.0500e- 3.000Oe- 2.0800e- 5.5000e- 3.000Oe- 5.8000e- 0.0000 3.2280 3.2280 1.7000e- 0.0000 3.2323 11 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 5.0200e- 0.0000 5.0200e- i 7.6000e- 0.0000 7.6000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 004 004 Off -Road •i 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 0.0166 0.0166 0.0154 0.0154 0.0000 i 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 i 34.2385 i i i 004 . 003 i Total 0.0331 0.3320 0.2175 3.9000e- 5.0200e- 0.0166 0.0216 7.6000e- 0.0154 0.0162 0.0000 33.9986 33.9986 9.6000e- 0.0000 34.2385 004 003 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9000e- i 6.6200e- i 1.3700e- 2.00OOe- i 4.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 4.2000e- i 1.1000e- 2.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 1.7451 1.7451 1.3000e- i 0.0000 i 1.7482 004 003 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 . 004 i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0102 Worker •i 6.7000e- 5.1000e- 5.6900e- 2.00OOe- 1.6500e- 1.00OOe- 1.6600e- 4.4000e- 1.00OOe- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.4829 1.4829 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4840 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 0.0452 Total 8.6000e- 7.1300e- 7.0600e- 4.00OOe- 2.0500e- 3.00OOe- 2.0800e- 5.5000e- 3.00OOe- 5.8000e- 0.0000 3.2280 3.2280 1.7000e- 0.0000 3.2323 11 004 003 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0452 i 0.0000 i 0.0452 0.0248 i 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.00OOe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4253 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.00OOe- 0.0452 5.4900e- 0.0507 0.0248 5.0500e- 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 8.4253 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4252 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0102 0.1060 Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 1.5000e- i 1.7100e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4449 0.4449 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.4452 1.000Oe- 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.000Oe- 1.5000e- 1.7100e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4449 0.4449 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4452 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i 0.0452 i 0.0000 i 0.0452 0.0248 0.0000 0.0248 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 5.4900e- 5.4900e- 5.0500e- 5.0500e- 0.0000 i 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 8.4252 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0102 0.1060 0.0538 1.000Oe- 0.0452 5.4900e- 0.0507 0.0248 5.0500e- 0.0299 0.0000 8.3577 8.3577 2.7000e- 0.0000 8.4252 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 Worker •i 2.00OOe- i 1.5000e- i 1.7100e- 0.0000 i 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- i 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.4449 0.4449 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.4452 1.2000e- 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.00OOe- 1.5000e- 1.7100e- 0.0000 4.9000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 1.3000e- 0.0000 1.3000e- 0.0000 0.4449 0.4449 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4452 11 004 004 003 004 004 004 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0262 i 0.0000 0.0262 0.0135 i 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 0.0262 5.0900e- 0.0313 0.0135 4.6900e- 0.0182 0.0000 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 9.7200e- Worker •i 2.7000e- i 2.1000e- i 2.2800e- 1.000Oe- i 6.6000e- 1.000Oe- 6.6000e- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.5932 0.5932 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.5936 0.0642 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.7000e- 2.1000e- 2.2800e- 1.0000e- 6.6000e- 1.000Oe- 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5932 0.5932 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5936 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 003 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0262 0.0000 0.0262 i 0.0135 0.0000 0.0135 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 5.0900e- 5.0900e- 4.6900e- 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 i 10.5078 i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 9.7200e- 0.1055 0.0642 1.2000e- 0.0262 5.0900e- 0.0313 0.0135 4.6900e- 0.0182 0.0000 10.4235 10.4235 3.3700e- 0.0000 10.5078 003 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 Worker •i 2.7000e- i 2.1000e- i 2.2800e- 1.00OOe- i 6.6000e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- i 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 i 0.5932 0.5932 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.5936 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 i � � 005 Total 2.7000e- 2.1000e- 2.2800e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- 1.00OOe- 6.6000e- 1.7000e- 0.0000 1.8000e- 0.0000 0.5932 0.5932 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5936 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2427 i 2.1968 i 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 i 265.1934 265.1934 0.0647 i 0.0000 i 266.8109 003 Total 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1934 265.1934 0.0647 0.0000 266.8109 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 i Vendor •1 8.5300e- 0.2701 0.0681 6.4000e- 0.0159 1.3200e- 0.0172 4.5800e- 1.2600e- 5.8400e- 0.0000 i 61.6267 61.6267 4.1100e- 0.0000 i 61.7295 i i i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.0285 0.0220 0.2433 7.000Oe- 0.0704 5.5000e- 0.0709 0.0187 5.000Oe- 0.0192 0.0000 i 63.3909 63.3909 1.8300e- 0.0000 i 63.4366 i i i i i 004 004 004 003 i 3.0800e- Total 0.0371 0.2921 0.3114 1.3400e- 0.0862 1.8700e- 0.0881 0.0233 1.7600e- 0.0250 0.0000 125.0176 125.0176 5.9400e- 0.0000 125.1660 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.2427 i 2.1968 i 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1931 265.1931 0.0647 i 0.0000 i 266.8106 003 i Total 0.2427 2.1968 1.9292 3.0800e- 0.1279 0.1279 0.1203 0.1203 0.0000 265.1931 265.1931 0.0647 0.0000 266.8106 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •1 8.5300e- 0.2701 0.0681 6.4000e- 0.0159 1.3200e- 0.0172 4.5800e- 1.2600e- 5.8400e- 0.0000 i 61.6267 61.6267 4.1100e- 0.0000 i 61.7295 i i i i i 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.0285 0.0220 0.2433 7.00OOe- 0.0704 5.5000e- 0.0709 0.0187 5.00OOe- 0.0192 - 0.0000 i 63.3909 63.3909 1.8300e- 0.0000 i 63.4366 i i i i i 004 004 004 003 i 1.00OOe- Total 0.0371 0.2921 0.3114 1.3400e- 0.0862 1.8700e- 0.0881 0.0233 1.7600e- 0.0250 0.0000 125.0176 125.0176 5.9400e- 0.0000 125.1660 004 004 003 004 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.00OOe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 1.1652 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.00OOe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 1.1652 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Vendor •i 3.000Oe- i 1.0700e- i 2.7000e- 0.0000 i 7.000Oe- 0.0000 7.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.2671 0.2671 2.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.2675 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i 8.7200e- Worker •i 1.2000e- i 9.000Oe- i 9.8000e- 0.0000 i 3.1000e- 0.0000 3.1000e- i 8.000Oe- 0.0000 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.2679 0.2679 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.2680 1.000Oe- 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 i � � 005 Total 1.5000e- 1.1600e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 3.0007 0.0000 0.5356 11 004 003 003 004 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 i 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 i 1.1652 i i i 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i Total 9.5000e- 8.7200e- 8.2900e- 1.000Oe- 4.8000e- 4.8000e- 4.5000e- 4.5000e- 0.0000 1.1582 1.1582 2.8000e- 0.0000 1.1652 004 003 003 005 004 004 004 004 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 Vendor •i 3.00OOe- i 1.0700e- i 2.7000e- � 0.0000 i 7.00OOe- � 0.0000 � 7.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- � 0.0000 2.00OOe- � 0.0000 i 0.2671 � 0.2671 � 2.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.2675 �� 005 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total Worker •i 1.2000e- i 9.00OOe- i 9.8000e- 0.0000 i 3.1000e- 0.0000 3.1000e- i 8.00OOe- 0.0000 8.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.2679 0.2679 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.2680 0.0160 004 005 004 004 004 005 005 i � � 005 Total 1.5000e- 1.1600e- 1.2500e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 0.0000 3.8000e- 1.00OOe- 0.0000 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5350 0.5350 3.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5356 005 004 003 003 004 003 004 004 004 005 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.4619 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.O5OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 0.4642 0.0160 0.0174 3.00OOe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 2.4303 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.000Oe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.000Oe- 1.1500e- 1.000Oe- 1.1600e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.0331 1.0331 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.0339 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.0000e- 1.1500e- 1.000Oe- 1.1600e- 3.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0331 1.0331 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0339 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.4619 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.3000e- 0.0160 0.0174 3.000Oe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 i 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 2.4303 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 0.4642 0.0160 0.0174 3.000Oe- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 1.0500e- 0.0000 2.4256 2.4256 1.9000e- 0.0000 2.4303 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Worker •i 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.00OOe- 1.1500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1600e- 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 i 1.0331 1.0331 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.0339 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 4.7000e- 3.6000e- 3.9600e- 1.00OOe- 1.1500e- 1.00OOe- 1.1600e- 3.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 3.1000e- 0.0000 1.0331 1.0331 3.00OOe- 0.0000 1.0339 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.0243 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 0.1277 1.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.1279 i i i 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.0244 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 5.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.1279 11 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- i 7.6000e- 9.1000e- i 0.0000 i i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 i 0.1277 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.1279 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 2.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- i 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- i 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0527 7.6000e- 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 0.0000 6.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 0.0000 0.0527 11 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •i 0.0243 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 1.1000e- i 7.6000e- 9.1000e- i 0.0000 i i 5.000Oe- i 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.1277 i 0.1277 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.1279 004 004 004 005 005 005 005 . 005 i Total 0.0244 7.6000e- 9.1000e- 0.0000 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 5.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1277 0.1277 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.1279 11 004 004 005 005 005 005 005 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving :,i 9.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 2.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- i 1.9000e- 0.0000 i 6.00OOe- 0.0000 6.00OOe- i 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0527 0.1163 005 005 004 005 005 005 005 Total 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 1.9000e- 0.0000 6.00OOe- 0.0000 6.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.0526 0.0526 0.0000 0.0000 0.0527 11 005 005 004 005 003 005 005 1 005 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0113 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 i 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 i 18.1668 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving :,i 9.3000e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 0.0122 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.000018.1668 004 003 003 003 003 1 003 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Worker •i 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.000Oe- 1.4800e- 1.000Oe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.2915 1.2915 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.2924 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.000Oe- 1.4800e- 1.000Oe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.000Oe- 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.0007 0.0000 1.2924 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 003 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0113 i 0.1163 i 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 i 18.0211 i 18.0211 5.8300e- i 0.0000 i 18.1668 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving :i 9.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 004 Total 0.0122 0.1163 0.1319 2.1000e- 6.1000e- 6.1000e- 5.6100e- 5.6100e- 0.0000 18.0211 18.0211 5.8300e- 0.0000 18.1668 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 3.7 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.00OOe- 1.4800e- 1.00OOe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2915 1.2915 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2924 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 i � � 005 Total 5.6000e- 4.2000e- 4.7100e- 1.00OOe- 1.4800e- 1.00OOe- 1.4900e- 3.9000e- 1.00OOe- 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.2915 1.2915 3.00O7 0.0000 1.2924 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.1480 4.3565 1.1557 0.0144 0.4237 0.0259 0.4496 0.1195 0.0248 0.1443 0.0000 i 1,397.330 1,397.330 0.0736 0.0000 i 1,399.170 i i i i i i i i � � i 4 i 4 i i i 3 Unmitigated 0.1480 4.3565 1.1557 0.0144 0.4237 0.0259 0.4496 0.1195 0.0248 0.1443 0.0000 1,397.330 - 1,397.330 - 0.0736 - 0.0000 1,399.170 4 4 3 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building ......................................------------ Parking Lot • • • •Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail • • • + 5.52 ; 0.00 • •; 66.20 ; 5.52 5.52 -------------------- ; 0.00 0.00 ; 66.20 66.20 65,711 -----------------------:-------------------------- 898,864 65,711 898,864 Total 71.72 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 40.00 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 ................ ...... .�-----------t ------- T... 40.00 40.00 - 40.00 r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Refrigerated Warehouse No 40.00 40.00 40.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.1600001 0.0000001 0.2300001 0.6100001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000 0.000000 } I I I I I I I I I I Parking Lot 0.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.1600001 0.0000001 0.2300001 0.6100001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000 0.000000 } I I I I I I I I I I Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 0.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.160000, 0.000000, 0.230000, 0.610000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •I I I I I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I I 11,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 Mitigated I I I I I I I I 11,249.067 I I 0I 0 I I 5 -----------•I rl I I I - ------'-------'-------'-------'----------------------------------------------------------- I I I I 1 • I I I '-------'-------'------- r....... Electricity •I I I I I I I I I I I I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I-------1 I I 11,249.067 11,249.067 I 0.0516 I 0.0107 1,253.535 Unmitigated ; I I I I I I I 1 . I 0I 0 I I I $ •I I I I I ry I I I 1 • -- I I I -------I T------- NaturalGas •I I I I 0.0269 I 0.2448 I 0.2056 11.4700e- I I I I 0.0186 I I I 0.0186 I I I 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 I I I I 266.4921 1266.4921 15.1100e- 14.8900e- 268.0757 Mitigated 003 i i i 003 i 003 - - - - - - - - - - - • -------------- i--------------- --------------- }--------------+--------------I--------------- --------------- --------------- }--------------* --------------- --------------+--------------}--------------4---------------- - - - - - - - NaturalGas 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- - 0.0186 0.0186 - 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- - 4.8900e- 268.0757 Unmitigated 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I Pm Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 1 27760 •1 1.5000.- 1 1.3600.- 1 1.1400.- 1 1.0000.- I 11.0000.- 1 1.0000.- I 1 1.0000.- 1.0000.- 0.0000 1 1.4814 1 1.4814 1 3.0000.- 1 3.0000.- 1 1.4902 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 ; I I 1 005 1 005 i ' - - - - - - - - - -I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I -------- I I I Parking Lot I 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I '1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I ---------- • 1 '1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I Refrigerated • 1 t -------I i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------i-------*-------7------ 1 i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 1 4.96611e m 0.0268 1 0.2434 1 0.2045 1 1.4600e- I 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 I 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 r 0.0000 1 265.0107 1 265.0107 1 5.0800e- 1 4.8600e- 266.5855 Warehouse -No i +006 003 i I 003 003 Rail Total 0.2448 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- 4.8900e- 268.0757 11 003 003 003 003 003 003 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 27760 .1 1.5000.- 1 1.3600.- I 1.1400.- 1 1.0000.- I 11.0000.- 1 1.0000.- I 1 1.0000.- 1.0000.- 0.0000 1 1.4814 I 1.4814 1 3.0000.- 1 3.0000.- I 1.4902 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 005 005 ' - - - - - - - - - -I 1 I I I I I I I 1 • I .I-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'-------'--------------+-------I-----'-------'-------'------- *------- ------�I Parking Lot I-- I I I I I I I I I I I 0 •1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I ---------- •I------- ------ ------ ------ ------' I------- ------ - i -------i- i-------i-------i- i- i -------i- -, 1 i-------i-------i------- Refrigerated ,1 1 4.96611. •1 0.0268 1 0.2434 1 0.2045 1 1.4600e- I 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 I 1 0.0185 1 0.0185 r 0.0000 1 265.0107 1 265.0107 1 5.0800e- 1 4.8600e- 266.5855 1 1 Warehouse -No !1 I I I I I I 1 1 r I I I 1 I +006 .1 I I 1 003 I I I I 1 1 r 1 I 1 003 1 003 Rail Total 0.0269 0.2448 0.2056 1.4700e- 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0186 0.0000 266.4921 266.4921 5.1100e- 4.8900e- 268.0757 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use I Land Use kWh/yr I MT/yr General Office 1 76160 •1 24.2662 i 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 24.3530 Building 003 004 Parking Lot • ---------------- 11060 -1 3.5240 i 1.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.5366 Warehouse -No i +006 8 0 004 i 005 --------------------- 4i ------- i------- i-------- ------- Refrigerated 3.833e ;i 1,221.276 i 0.0504 i 0.0104 1,225.646 Warehouse -No i +006 8 0 Rail Total 1,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 0 j 5 j Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr General Office 76160 -1 24.2662 i 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 24.3530 Building i 003 004 ----------------- Parking Lot 11060 ■i 3.5240 i 1.5000e- 3.000Oe- 3.5366 004 005 i ---------i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 3.833e 1,221.276 1 0.0504 1 0.0104 1,225.646 Warehouse -No i +006 8 0 Rail Total 1,249.067 0.0516 0.0107 1,253.535 0 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 0.4265 i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.0000e- i 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.8400e- '� 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 -------------- +----------------------------- I--------------- --------------- I---------------I---------------I---------------I---------------+ - - - - - - - + + + Unmitigated 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- - 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0486 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating '� Consumer •i 0.3777 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 1 0.0000 Products ------------- Landscaping •i 2.2000e- i 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- i 0.0000 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.5400e- 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- '� 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 i 003 i 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 1.0000e- 1.0000e- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- 1.0007 0.0000 4.8400e- 4.8400e- 005 003 003 005 005 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 005 003 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.0486 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 0.3777 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Landscaping 2.2000e- i 2.000Oe- i 2.3500e- i 0.0000 i i 1.000Oe- i 1.000Oe- i i 1.0000e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.5400e- i 4.5400e- i 1.000Oe- 0.0000 i 4.8400e- i 004 005 003 005 005 005 005 . 003 003 005 i 003 Total 0.4265 2.000Oe- 2.3500e- 0.0000 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 11.0000e- 0.0000 4.5400e- 4.5400e- 1.000Oe- 0.0000 4.8400e- 005 003 005 005 005 005 003 003 005 003 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 95.3117 i 0.6766 0.0167 i 117.1868 Land Use Mgal MT/yr - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4---------------I---------------* - - - - - - - Unmitigated 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use I Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office 1.42187 / •1 9.4350 0.0467 i 1.1700e- i 10.9514 Building i 0.871469 :i 003 - J •r- Parking Lot - - - - - - - - - - - - -------J-------T ... .... 0/0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 --r------+i-------1-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 19.2289 / ;i 85.8767 i 0.6299 i 0.0155 106.2353 Warehouse -No i 0 Rail Total 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr General Office i 1.42187/ •i 9.4350 0.0467 1.1700e- i 10.9514 Building i 0.871469 ;i i 003 •------------ ---- Parking Lot 0 / 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 T 0.0000 --r------+i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 19.2289 / ;i 85.8767 0.6299 i 0.0155 106.2353 Warehouse -No i 0 Rail Total 95.3117 0.6766 0.0167 117.1868 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual CategoryNear 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Total CO2 C N20 CO2e CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 19.8160 i 1.1711 i 0.0000 1 49.0933 - - - - - - - - - - - %--------------+--------------}--------------* " " " " " " " Unmitigated 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed I Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 7.44 •1 1.5103 0.0893 0.0000 i 3.7416 Building i ------- ------- Parking Lot 0 �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 .� i .i i i i Refrigerated 90.18 pi 18.3057 i 1.0818 i 0.0000 45.3517 Warehouse -No Rail 7� Total 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr General Office 1 7.44 •i 1.5103 0.0893 0.0000 i 3.7416 Building •' i ' • -------- ------- Parking Lot 1 0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 -----------t------4'------- -------- Refrigerated 1 90.18 ;1 18.3057 1 1.0818 i 0.0000 45.3517 Warehouse -No i Rail Total 19.8160 1.1711 0.0000 49.0933 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 37 Date: 3/26/2020 1:32 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks South Coast Air Basin, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 8.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 8,000.00 i 0 •------------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Refrigerated Warehouse Rail 95.94 --- --------- --------- -i------------- - - - - - -- 1000sgft 4.77 95,945.00 -+ 0 -No + ; •------------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- T -------- - - - - -- ------------------E--------------- Parking Lot 79.00 Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 ----------------------------_---------------- ------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 1 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r tblFleetMix + LDT1 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.16 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LHD1 �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.9320e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 95,940.00 95,945.00 ----------------------------- tblLandUse Y ---------------------------- LotAcreage �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 0.18 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 0.69 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 0.69 -------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ IndoorWaterUSeRate ------------------------------ 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year Ib/day Ib/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2020 •1 51.3537 1 42.4719 I 22.4978 1 0.0432 1 18.2675 1 2.1990 1 20.4664 1 9.9840 1 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 1 4,201.022 1 4,201.022 1 1.1978 1 0.0000 41218.651 3 I 3 I 1 1 0 '1 I I I 1 1 I 1 I • 1 I I 1 2021 •1 51.0803 1 21.2487 1 21.4200 1 0.0429 1 0.8897 1 1.0626 1 1.9522 1 0.2391 1 1.0046 1.2437 0.0000 1 4,172.070 1 4,172.070 1 0.7183 1 0.0000 4,189.373 0 I 0 I 1 I 8 '1 I I I 1 I I I I • 1 I I I I Maximum 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 0.0000 4,218.651 11 3 3 0 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Year Ib/day Ib/day I I I 1 1 I I I I I 1 2020 •1 51.3537 I 42.4719 1 22.4978 I 0.0432 1 18.2675 1 2.1990 1 20.4664 1 9.9840 1 2.0230 12.0071 � 0.0000 1 4,201.022 1 4,201.022 I 1.1978 1 0.0000 i 4,218.651 3 1 3 I 1 I 0 ;� I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I • 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 2021 51.0803 I 21.2487 1 21.4200 I 0.0429 1 0.8897 1 1.0626 I 1.9522 1 0.2391 1 1.0046 1.2437 � 0.0000 i 4,172.070 1 4,172.070 I 0.7183 1 0.0000 i 4,189.373 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 01 0 I 1 I 8 '1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 Maximum 51.3537 42.4719 22.4978 0.0432 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,201.022 4,201.022 1.1978 0.0000 4,218.651 11 3 3 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i i i i 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 1 1,619.194 Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 i i 0.1019 0.1019� i 1,609.628 � 1,609.628 i 0.0309 � 0.0295 1 1,619.194 003 i i i i i 8 i 8 i i i 0 Mobile �� 0.8089 i 22.9571 6.2916 i 0.0793 2.3651 0.1422 i 2.5073 0.6659 i 0.1360 0.8019 8,499.969 8,499.969 i 0.4422 18,511.0249 Mobile •1 0.8089 i 22.9571 i 6.2916 i 0.0793 2.3651 0.1422 i 2.5073 i 0.6659 i 0.1360 0.8019 i 8,499.969 8,499.969 i 0.4422 18,511.0249 0 i 0 Total Total 3.2939 24.2987 7.4371 0.0873 2.3651 0.2442 2.6093 0.6659 0.2380 0.9039 10,109.63 10,109.63 10,109.63 0.4732 0.0295 10,130.26 11 78 78 78 16 16 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i � i i i 004 005 005 005 005 , 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 1 1,619.194 003 8 8 i 0 Mobile �� 0.8089 i 22.9571 6.2916 i 0.0793 2.3651 0.1422 i 2.5073 0.6659 i 0.1360 0.8019 8,499.969 8,499.969 i 0.4422 18,511.0249 1 i i i i i i i i • 0 i 0 Total 3.2939 24.2987 7.4371 0.0873 2.3651 0.2442 2.6093 0.6659 0.2380 0.9039 10,109.63 10,109.63 0.4732 0.0295 10,130.26 11 78 78 16 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1/27/2021 5, 18 - 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition ! 1/1/2020 :1/28/2020 5: 20: A i 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A i 3 •Grading +Grading !2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 : 5 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 230: A i 5 •Architectural Coating !Architectural Coating !12/7/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 20: A i 6 :Paving :Paving 1/2/2021 1/27/2021 5, 18 - Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 21 8.001 80, 0.38 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70; 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix (HHDT ----------------• Site Preparation 7; -----_--, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------_ 14.70; 1 ----------------------- 6.90; 20.00;1-D_Mix -----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT --------------- ° Grading A -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: --------------------------------- 14.70; 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ----------- iHDT_Mix I ---------- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction : -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70; ------------------------�---------- 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix I -------- IHHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i4----------- 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70; 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT 1.6587 2.1607 i 1.5419 f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 11.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 0.5020 , 0.0000 , 0.5020 , 0.0760 , 0.0000 ; 0.0760 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 , 33.2010 , 21.7532 , 0.0388 , , 1.6587 , 1.6587 , , 1.5419 ; 1.5419 :-3-,747.704 , 3,747.704 , 1.0580 , 1 3,774.153 9 i 9 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0183 i 0.6408 i 0.1333 1.7900e- i 0.0402 � 2.0700e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 1.9800e- 0.0130 i 193.7520 � 193.7520 � 0.0137 i i 194.0946 003 003 003 i %--------------------------------------------'-------------------------------------F -------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 1.7200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 171.5755 � 171.5755 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 33.2010 Total 0.0856 0.6863 0.7446 3.5100e- 0.2078 3.3500e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1600e-0.0586 3,747.704 1.0580 365.3274 365.3274 0.0187 365.7937 003 003 003 9 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.5020 0.0000 0.5020 i 0.0760 0.0000 0.0760 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 i 33.2010 i 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 i 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 i i 3,774.153 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 0.0000 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0183 i 0.6408 i 0.1333 1.7900e- i 0.0402 � 2.0700e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 1.9800e- 0.0130 i 193.7520 � 193.7520 � 0.0137 i i 194.0946 003 003 003 i ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 ,,119 '� i i i i i i i i i i i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - F-0-0-0-00- 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 1.7200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 :-171.5755 171.5755 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 42.4173 Total 0.0856 0.6863 0.7446 3.5100e- 0.2078 3.3500e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1600e- 0.0586 1.1918 365.3274 365.3274 0.0187 365.7937 003 003 003 6 5 1 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 ,,119 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 6 6 i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 '� i i i i i i i i i i i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0807 i 0.0546 i 0.7336 � 2.0700e- i 0.2012 � 1.5300e- � 0.2027 i 0.0534 � 1.4100e- 0.0548 � i 205.8905 � 205.8905 � 5.9300e- i i 206.0389 9 003 003 003 003 i 21.5136 Total 0.0807 0.0546 0.7336 2.0700e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 205.8905 205.8905 5.9307 206.0389 11 003 003 6 003 5 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 i 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 6 6 i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 0.0000 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0807 i 0.0546 i 0.7336 2.0700e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- i i 206.0389 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0807 0.0546 0.7336 2.0700e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 2,895.710 205.8905 205.8905 5.9300e- 206.0389 003 003 1 1'2,872.485 1 003 6 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 i 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i 1 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1'2,872.485 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� i i i i i i i i i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 � 1.7200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 171.5755 � 171.5755 � 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0673 0.0455 0.6114 1.7200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 2,895.710 171.5755 171.5755 4.9400e- 171.6991 003 003 1 1 003 6 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 i 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� i i i i i i i i i • 1 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 16.8485 0.0269 Worker •i 0.0673 i 0.0455 i 0.6114 � 1.7200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 171.5755 � 171.5755 � 4.9400e- i i 171.6991 003 003 003 003 i 1.1171 Total 0.0673 0.0455 0.6114 1.7200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 171.5755 171.5755 4.9400e- 171.6991 003 1 003 5 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 : 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i 5 Vendor •i 0.0730 i 2.3171 i 0.5636 5.6100e- i 0.1408 0.0115 0.1522 i 0.0405 0.0110 0.0515 :-6-00.1409 600.1409 0.0384 601.1012 003 Worker •i 0.2512 i 0.1698 i 2.2824 6.4300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 i 640.5483 640.5483 0.0185 i i 641.0098 003 003 003Ei 0.0269 Total 0.3242 2.4869 2.8461 0.0120 0.7667 0.0162 0.7830 0.2065 0.0154 0.2219 2,568.634 1,240.689 1,240.689 0.0569 1,242.111 [737000 1 1 5 2 2 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 i 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 [737000 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total Vendor •i 0.0730 i 2.3171 i 0.5636 5.6100e- i 0.1408 0.0115 0.1522 i 0.0405 0.0110 0.0515 :-6-00.1409 600.1409 0.0384 601.1012 003 Worker •i 0.2512 i 0.1698 i 2.2824 6.4300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 i 640.5483 640.5483 0.0185 i i 641.0098 003 003 003Ei Total 0.3242 2.4869 2.8461 0.0120 0.7667 0.0162 0.7830 0.2065 0.0154 0.2219 1,240.689 1,240.689 0.0569 1,242.111 9 9 3 1 2 2 0 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 i 17.4321 i 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i i 2;568.764 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6777 2,568.764 9 9 3 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 ------------------------------------------'----------------------- --+ --------------'--------------- � Vendor •1 0.0619 2.1069 0.5116 5.5700e 0.1408 4.3000e 0.1451 0.0405 4.1100e 0.0446 595.6362 0.0368 596.5571 � 003 003 003 i 17.4321 Worker •i 0.2344 i 0.1529 i 2.1026 6.2200e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 :-6-1-9.8630 619.8630 0.0167 i i 620.2807 003 003 003 i Total 0.2963 2.2597 2.6142 0.0118 0.7667 8.9300e- 0.7757 0.2065 8.3800e-0.2149 2,568.764 1,215.499 1,215.499 0.0535 1,216.837 003 9 003 3 1 3 3 8 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 i 17.4321 i 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 i 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i i 2;568.764 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6777 2,568.764 9 9 3 1 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ------------------------------------------'----------------------- --+ --------------'--------------- � Vendor •1 0.0619 2.1069 0.5116 5.5700e 0.1408 4.3000e 0.1451 0.0405 4.1100e 0.0446 595.6362 0.0368 596.5571 � 003 003 003 i Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 Worker •i 0.2344 i 0.1529 i 2.1026 6.2200e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 :-6-1-9.8630 619.8630 0.0167 i i 620.2807 003 003 003 i Total Total 0.2963 2.2597 2.6142 0.0118 0.7667 8.9300e- 0.7757 0.2065 8.3800e-0.2149 281.4481 1,215.499 1,215.499 0.0535 281.9928 1,216.837 003 003 003 3 3 8 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0493 i 0.0334 i 0.4483 1.2600e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- i i 125.9127 003 004 004 003 i 48.8603 Total 0.0493 0.0334 0.4483 1.2600e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- 11 125.9127 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0493 i 0.0334 i 0.4483 1.2600e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- i i 125.9127 003 004 004 003 i 48.8370 Total 0.0493 0.0334 0.4483 1.2600e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 125.8220 125.8220 3.6300e- 125.9127 003 003 004 004 003 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •1 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0460 i 0.0300 i 0.4130 1.2200e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 i 121.7588 121.7588 3.2800e- i i 121.8409 003 004 004 003 i 1.5268 Total 0.0460 0.0300 0.4130 1.2200e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 0.0193 121.7588 121.7588 3.2800e- 121.8409 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0460 i 0.0300 i 0.4130 1.2200e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 :-1-2-1.7588 121.7588 3.2800e- i i 121.8409 003 004 004 003 i 14.6532 Total 0.0460 0.0300 0.4130 1.2200e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 121.7588 121.7588 3.28077 121.8409 003 004 9 004 3 003 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i 2,225.057 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.3589 Worker •i 0.0628 i 0.0410 i 0.5632 � 1.6700e- i 0.1677 � 1.2400e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1400e- 0.0456 � i 166.0347 � 166.0347 � 4.4800e- i i 166.1466 9 003 003 003 003 i 0.0228 Total 0.0628 0.0410 0.5632 1.6700e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 2,225.057 166.0347 166.0347 4.4807 166.1466 11 003 [777000 003 9 1'2,207.210 9 003 3 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 i 12.9191 i 14.6532 0.0228 i i 0.6777 0.6777 i i 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 i 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i i 2,225.057 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 11 [777000 9 1'2,207.210 9 1 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 3.7 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0628 i 0.0410 i 0.5632 1.6700e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- i i 166.1466 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0628 0.0410 0.5632 1.6700e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 166.0347 166.0347 4.4800e- 166.1466 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 I CO2e Category Ib/day 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 Ib/day Mitigated •i 0.8089 22.9571 i 6.2916 � 0.0793 i 2.3651 i 0.1422 i 2.5073 i 0.6659 i 0.1360 0.8019 8,499.969 8,499.969 � 0.4422 i 8,511.0249 0 i 0 Unmitigated 0.8089 22.9571 6.2916 0.0793 2.3651 0.1422 2.5073 0.6659 0.1360 0.8019 8,499.969 • 8,499.969 • 0.4422 - 8,511.0249 0 0 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building ......................................------------ Parking Lot • • • • • • •Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail • • • + 5.52 ; 0.00 • • • •; 66.20 ; 5.52 5.52 -------------------- ; 0.00 0.00 ; 66.20 66.20 65,711 -----------------------:-------------------------- 898,864 65,711 898,864 Total 71.72 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 40.00 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 ................ ...... .�-----------t ------- T... 40.00 40.00 - 40.00 r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Refrigerated Warehouse No 40.00 40.00 40.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.000000+ 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.160000; 0.000000; 0.230000; 0.610000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000 - 0.000000 r Parking Lot 0.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.1600001 0.0000001 0.2300001 0.6100001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000 0.000000 r Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 0.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.160000, 0.000000, 0.230000, 0.610000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 8.0500e- i i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 11,609.628 1 0.0309 i 0.0295 1 1,619.194 Mitigated ;i 003 . i 8 1 8 1 i 0 NaturalGas 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0500e- - 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 - 1,609.628 0.0309 - 0.0295 1,619.194 Unmitigated 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I IPM2.5Total Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I i 76.0548 •1 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 1 6.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- 1 8.9476 1 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- i 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 ; I I 1 004 � 004 � I � I I I I I I I 1 • I I 1 1---------�-------'-------------------------------------------------------- 1------------------------------ I I I I I I I I 1- I I I Parking Lot 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • I I I I I Refri erated • t------41 I i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i -------*-------t ------- 1 i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 13605.8 •I 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r 11,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 1 Warehouse -No ;1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 r I 1 I I I 003 1 2 Rail Total 1.3414 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 003 8 8 8 8 0 0 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 10.0760548■I 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 16.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- • 1 8.9476 I 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- 1 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 ; i I 1 004 1 004 I I I I I I I 1 • I I I t �1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I *------- Parking Lot , 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- - - Refri erated 13.6058 �i 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r i 1,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 Warehouse -No 1 ;1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 } I 1 I 1 I 003 I 2 I 1 I I Rail Total 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 11 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i 004 i i 005 005 005 i 005 . 004 i Unmitigated 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 - 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 � Coating '� ■ i -- - - - - - - - - -%i- - ------ ---- -- --- ---- ------- ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ ------- +- - - - - - -i- - - - - -- ---- ----- ----------- Consumer •1 2.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- � i 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- � 0.0427 i � i i � i � i � i � 003 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating'� ■ ' i -- - - - - - - - - -%i- - ------ ---- -- --- ---- ------- ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ ------- +- - - - - - -i- - - - - -- ---- ----- ----------- Consumer •i 2.0693 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- i 1.7000e- i 0.0188 i 0.0000 i i 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- i i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 i 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:34 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks South Coast Air Basin, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 8.00 + 1000sgft ; 0.00 8,000.00 i 0 •------------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Refrigerated Warehouse Rail 95.94 --- --------- --------- -i------------- - - - - - -- 1000sgft 4.77 95,945.00 -+ 0 -No + ; •------------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- T -------- - - - - -- ------------------E--------------- Parking Lot 79.00 Space 0.71 31,600.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 31 Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2020 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20 Intensity 0.006 (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - See SWAPE comments about parking, office, and warehouse land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment about construction phase. Demolition - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Grading - Vehicle Trips - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Water And Wastewater - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Fleet Mix - Consistent with Air Quality Analysis model. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation WaterlJnpaved RoadVehicleSpeed i 0 15 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 10.00 5.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t-------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 8.00 ----------------------------_---------------- tblConstruction Phase ---------- ------------t------------------------- NumDays r 20.00 18.00 ----------------------------_---------------- ------------t------------------------- tblFleetMix HHD 1 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � ------------t----------- ----------- -------------HHD r 0.03 0.61 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDA--------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.55 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r tblFleetMix r LDT1 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT1-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.04 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r -----------tblFleetMix---------- � -------------LDT2-------------r ------------t----------- ----------- 0.20 0.00 r tblFleetMix LDT2 0.20 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter tblFleetMix LHD1 0.02 0.16 ----------------------------- tblFleetMix Y ---------------------------- LHD1 �-----------------------------4-------------------------- i 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD1 r 0.02 0.16 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix LHD2 r 5.8710e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MY r 4.7260e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MDV r 0.12 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MH r 9.5500e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix MHD r 0.02 0.23 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix OBUS r 2.0270e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix SBUS r 7.0400e-004 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS r 1.9320e-003 0.00 tblFleetMix UBUS 1.9320e-003 0.00 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter tblLandUse Land UseSquareFeet 95,940.00 95,945.00 ----------------------------- tblLandUse Y ---------------------------- LotAcreage �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 0.18 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage } 2.20 4.77 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CC TL } 8.40 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TL } 6.90 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips CW TL } 16.60 40.00 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 2.46 0.69 tblVehicleTrips ST TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU TR } 1.68 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 11.03 0.69 tblVehicleTrips WD TR } 1.68 0.69 -------------------------- tblWater ------------------------------ IndoorWaterUSeRate ------------------------------ 22,186,125.00 -------------------------- 19,228,900.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year Ib/day Ib/day I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 2020 •1 51.3871 1 42.4773 1 22.4499 1 0.0426 1 18.2675 1 2.1990 1 20.4664 1 9.9840 1 2.0230 � 12.0071 0.0000 1 4,137.151 1 4,137.151 1 1.1974 1 0.0000 i4,154.8115 7 1 7 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1- 1 I 1 2021 •1 51.1120 1 21.2617 1 21.2385 1 0.0423 1 0.8897 1 1.0627 1 1.9524 1 0.2391 1 1.0047 1.2439 0.0000 1 4,109.795 1 4,109.795 1 0.7181 1 0.0000 4,127.130 6 I 6 I 1 I 6 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Maximum 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.1974 0.0000 4,154.811 11 7 7 j 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Year Ib/day Ib/day I 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 2020 •1 51.3871 I 42.4773 1 22.4499 I 0.0426 1 18.2675 1 2.1990 1 20.4664 1 9.9840 1 2.0230 12.0071 � 0.0000 1 4,137.151 1 4,137.151 I 1.1974 1 0.0000 14,154.8115 7 1 7 I 1 ;� I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 2021 51.1120 I 21.2617 1 21.2385 I 0.0423 1 0.8897 1 1.0627 I 1.9524 1 0.2391 I 1.0047 � 1.2439 � 0.0000 i 4,109.795 1 4,109.795 I 0.7181 1 0.0000 4,127.130 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 6 1 6 I 1 I 5 '1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 Maximum 51.3871 42.4773 22.4499 0.0426 18.2675 2.1990 20.4664 9.9840 2.0230 12.0071 0.0000 4,137.151 4,137.151 1.1974 0.0000 4,154.811 11 7 7 j 5 1 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio -CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i i i i i i 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 i i 0.1019 0.1019� i 1,609.628 � 1,609.628 i 0.0309 � 0.0295 1 1,619.194 003 i i i i i 8 i 8 i i i 0 Mobile �� 0.8190 i 23.5424 6.4553 i 0.0787 2.3651 0.1428 i 2.5079 0.6659 i 0.1366 0.8025 8,436.300 8,436.300 i 0.4519 i 8,447.597 Mobile i 0.8190 i 23. 5424 i 6.4553 i 0.0787 2.3651 0.1428 i 2.5079 i 0.6659 i 0.1366 0.8025 i 36.300 8,436.300 i 0.4519 8,447.597 • 8,4 '� 4 i 4 i i Total 3.3040 24.8840 7.6008 0.0868 2.3651 0.2448 2.6100 0.6659 0.2386 0.9045 10,045.96 10,045.96 0.4829 0.0295 10,066.83 11 92 92 44 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Area •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i � i i i 004 005 005 005 005 , 004 i Energy •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 1.1267 i 8.0500e- 0.1019 i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 1,609.628 i 0.0309 0.0295 i 1,619.194 003 8 8 1 0 Mobile �� 0.8190 i 23.5424 6.4553 i 0.0787 2.3651 0.1428 i 2.5079 0.6659 i 0.1366 0.8025 8,436.300 8,436.300 i 0.4519 i 8,447.597 i 4 4 i 7 Total 3.3040 24.8840 7.6008 0.0868 2.3651 0.2448 2.6100 0.6659 0.2386 0.9045 10,045.96 10,045.96 0.4829 0.0295 10,066.83 92 92 44 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 1/27/2021 5, 18 - 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition ! 1/1/2020 :1/28/2020 5: 20: A i 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !1/29/2020 :2/4/2020 5 5� A i 3 •Grading +Grading !2/5/2020 :2/14/2020 : 5 8� A i 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction !2/15/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 230: A i 5 •Architectural Coating !Architectural Coating !12/7/2020 :1/1/2021 : 5 20: A i 6 :Paving :Paving 1/2/2021 1/27/2021 5, 18 - Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 4 Acres of Paving: 0.71 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 155,918; Non -Residential Outdoor: 51,973; Striped Parking Area: 1,896 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 : 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators 1 3 8.001 158, 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247, 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 31 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 41 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators 1 11 8.001 158, 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders 1 11 8.001 187, 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers 1 11 8.001 247, 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 8.001 97, 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes 1 1 1 7.001 231, 0.29 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 31 8.001 89, 0.20 1 �- -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 11 8.001 84, 0.74 + _ __i i _ Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31 7.001 _ 97, 0.37 a i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Welders 1 11 8.001 __ 46, 0.45 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers 1 21 8.001 130, 0.42 ------------------------------------------ �- - - - - ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment 1 21 8.001 132, 0.36 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers 1 21 8.001 80, 0.38 Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1 6.00: 78: 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Phase NameI Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 46.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix 1HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 6; i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------A-------------- I- Building Construction : 9; i------------ 56.00 I --------i 22.001 �- 0.00: ---------' --------- '- 14.70: ------------------------�---------- 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix I -------- THHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i4----------- 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT 1.6587 2.1607 i 1.5419 f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 11.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 0.5020 , 0.0000 , 0.5020 , 0.0760 , 0.0000 ; 0.0760 � 1 , 0.0000 , , 1 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 , 33.2010 , 21.7532 , 0.0388 , , 1.6587 , 1.6587 , , 1.5419 ; 1.5419 :-3-,747.704 , 3,747.704 , 1.0580 , 1 3,774.153 9 i 9 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0188 i 0.6492 i 0.1423 1.7600e- i 0.0402 � 2.1100e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 2.0100e- 0.0130 i 190.4429 � 190.4429 � 0.0142 i i 190.7987 003 003 003 i Off -Road •i 3.3121 i 33.2010 i 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 i 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 i i 3,774.153 '� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 i 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 1 33.2010 Total 0.0928 0.6992 0.6967 3.3800e- 0.2078 3.3900e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1900e- 0.0587 1.0580 351.3706 351.3706 0.0189 351.8422 11 003 003 003 9 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 0.5020 0.0000 0.5020 i 0.0760 0.0000 0.0760 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.3121 i 33.2010 i 21.7532 0.0388 1.6587 1.6587 1.5419 1.5419 0.0000 i 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 i i 3,774.153 '� i i i i i i i i • 9 i 9 i i i 6 Total 3.3121 33.2010 21.7532 0.0388 0.5020 1.6587 2.1607 0.0760 1.5419 1.6179 0.0000 3,747.704 3,747.704 1.0580 3,774.153 9 9 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0188 i 0.6492 i 0.1423 1.7600e- i 0.0402 � 2.1100e- 0.0423 i 0.0110 2.0100e- 0.0130 i 190.4429 � 190.4429 � 0.0142 i i 190.7987 003 003 003 i ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 ,,119 '� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 i 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 1 42.4173 Total 0.0928 0.6992 0.6967 3.3800e- 0.2078 3.3900e- 0.2112 0.0555 3.1900e- 0.0587 1.1918 351.3706 351.3706 0.0189 351.8422 11 003 003 003 6 5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 ............. Off -Road 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 2.174 2.19742.0216 2.0216 01 1 i 3,714.897 ,,119 '� i i i i i i i i • 6 i 6 i i i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0888 i 0.0600 i 0.6653 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- i i 193.2522 003 003 003 003 i 21.5136 Total 0.0888 0.0600 0.6653 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- 193.2522 003 003 6 003 5 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 18.0663 i 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.0765 i 42.4173 i 21.5136 0.0380 2.1974 2.1974 2.0216 2.0216 0.0000 i 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 i i 3,714.897 6 i 6 i i i 5 Total 4.0765 42.4173 21.5136 0.0380 18.0663 2.1974 20.2637 9.9307 2.0216 11.9523 0.0000 3,685.101 3,685.101 1.1918 3,714.897 6 6 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0888 i 0.0600 i 0.6653 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 i 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- i i 193.2522 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0888 0.0600 0.6653 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.5300e- 0.2027 0.0534 1.4100e- 0.0548 2,895.710 193.1132 193.1132 5.5600e- 193.2522 003 003 1 1'2,872.485 1 003 6 003 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •1 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 i 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 � 0.0297 i � 1.2734 � 1.2734 i � 1.1716 � 1.1716 � i 2,872.485 � 2,872.485 � 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 i i i 1 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1'2,872.485 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� i i i i i i i i i Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 2.4288 Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 � 1.6200e- i 0.1677 � 1.2800e- � 0.1689 i 0.0445 � 1.1800e- 0.0456 � i 160.9277 � 160.9277 � 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 9 003 003 003 003 i 0.0297 Total 0.0740 0.0500 0.5544 1.6200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 2,895.710 160.9277 160.9277 4.6307 161.0435 11 003 003 1 1 003 6 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Fugitive Dust •i 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 i 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 2.4288 i 26.3859 i 16.0530 0.0297 1.2734 1.2734 1.1716 1.1716 0.0000 i 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 i i 2,895.710 '� i i i i i i i i i • 1 1 i 6 Total 2.4288 26.3859 16.0530 0.0297 6.5523 1.2734 7.8258 3.3675 1.1716 4.5390 0.0000 2,872.485 2,872.485 0.9290 2,895.710 1 1 6 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 2.1198 19.1860 Worker •i 0.0740 i 0.0500 i 0.5544 1.6200e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- i i 161.0435 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0740 0.0500 0.5544 1.6200e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1800e- 0.0456 160.9277 160.9277 4.6300e- 161.0435 003 003 1 003 5 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Vendor •1 0.0764 i 2.3162 i 0.6245 5.4600e- i 0.1408 0.0116 0.1524 i 0.0405 0.0111 0.0517 i 583.8303 583.8303 0.0411 584.8566 '� 003 Worker •i 0.2763 i 0.1865 i 2.0697 6.0300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 600.7967 600.7967 0.0173 i i 601.2291 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3527 2.5027 2.6942 0.0115 0.7667 0.0164 0.7831 0.2065 0.0155 0.2221 2,568.634 1,184.627 1,184.627 0.0583 7,186.085 1 1 5 0 0 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 i 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 i 2,568.634 i i i 1 i 1 i i i 5 Total 2.1198 19.1860 16.8485 0.0269 1.1171 1.1171 1.0503 1.0503 0.0000 2,553.063 2,553.063 0.6229 2,568.634 1 1 5 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Vendor •i 0.0764 i 2.3162 i 0.6245 5.4600e- i 0.1408 0.0116 0.1524 i 0.0405 0.0111 0.0517 i 583.8303 583.8303 0.0411 i i 584.8566 003 Worker •i 0.2763 i 0.1865 i 2.0697 6.0300e- i 0.6260 4.7700e- 0.6307 i 0.1660 4.4000e- 0.1704 600.7967 600.7967 0.0173 i i 601.2291 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3527 2.5027 2.6942 0.0115 0.7667 0.0164 0.7831 0.2065 0.0155 0.2221 2,568.764 1,184.627 1,184.627 0.0583 1,186.085 9 9 3 0 0 7 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i 2;568.764 i i i 9 i 9 i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Vendor •1 0.0650 i 2.1019 i 0.5687 � 5.4200e- i 0.1408 � 4.4400e- � 0.1452 i 0.0405 � 4.2400e- 0.0448 � i 579.4223 � 579.4223 � 0.0394 i i 580.4064 '� 003 003 003 i 1.9009 Worker •i 0.2583 i 0.1679 i 1.9033 5.8300e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 581.3647 581.3647 0.0156 i i 581.7556 003 003 003 i 0.0269 Total 0.3233 2.2698 2.4719 0.0113 0.7667 9.0700e- 0.7758 0.2065 8.5100e- 0.2150 2,568.764 1,160.787 1,160.787 0.0550 1,162.162 003 9 9 003 3 0 0 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 i 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 i 2,568.764 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Total 1.9009 17.4321 16.5752 0.0269 0.9586 0.9586 0.9013 0.9013 0.0000 2,553.363 2,553.363 0.6160 2,568.764 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0650 i 2.1019 i 0.5687 � 5.4200e- i 0.1408 � 4.4400e- � 0.1452 i 0.0405 � 4.2400e- 0.0448 � i 579.4223 � 579.4223 � 0.0394 i i 580.4064 '� 003 003 003 i Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 Worker •i 0.2583 i 0.1679 i 1.9033 5.8300e- i 0.6260 4.6300e- 0.6306 i 0.1660 4.2700e- 0.1703 581.3647 581.3647 0.0156 i i 581.7556 003 003 003 i Total Total 0.3233 2.2698 2.4719 0.0113 0.7667 9.0700e- 0.7758 0.2065 8.5100e- 0.2150 281.4481 1,160.787 1,160.787 0.0550 281.9928 1,162.162 003 003 003 0 0 0 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 -----------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------ -------------'--------------�------- Worker •i 0.0543 i 0.0366 i 0.4065 1.1800e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- i i 118.0986 003 004 004 003 i 48.8603 Total 0.0543 0.0366 0.4065 1.1800e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- 11 118.0986 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2422 i 1.6838 i 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 i i 281.9928 003 Total 48.8603 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.9928 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 -----------------------------------------------------'------------------------------------ -------------'--------------�------- Worker •i 0.0543 i 0.0366 i 0.4065 1.1800e- i 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- i i 118.0986 003 004 004 003 i 48.8370 Total 0.0543 0.0366 0.4065 1.1800e- 0.1230 9.4000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.6000e- 0.0335 281.4481 118.0136 118.0136 3.4000e- 11 118.0986 003 003 004 004 003 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 � 2.9700e- i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 i � 0.0941 � 0.0941 � i 281.4481 � 281.4481 � 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 003 Worker •i 0.0507 i 0.0330 i 0.3739 1.1500e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- i i 114.2734 003 004 004 003 i 1.5268 Total 0.0507 0.0330 0.3739 1.1500e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 0.0193 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- 114.2734 003 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Archit. Coating •i 48.6181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •1 0.2189 i 1.5268 i 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 i i 281.9309 003 Total 48.8370 1.5268 1.8176 2.9700e- 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0941 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0193 281.9309 11 003 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total Worker •i 0.0507 i 0.0330 i 0.3739 1.1500e- i 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 i 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- i i 114.2734 003 004 004 003 i 14.6532 Total 0.0507 0.0330 0.3739 1.1500e- 0.1230 9.1000e- 0.1239 0.0326 8.4000e- 0.0335 114.1966 114.1966 3.0700e- 114.2734 003 004 9 004 3 003 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i 2,225.057 i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Paving - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.3589 Worker •i 0.0692 i 0.0450 i 0.5098 1.5600e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- i i 155.8274 003 003 003 003 i 0.0228 Total 0.0692 0.0450 0.5098 1.5600e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 2,225.057 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- 155.8274 003 003 9 9 003 3 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Off -Road •i 1.2556 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 i 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 i 2,225.057 i i i i i 9 i 9 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.1033 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3589 12.9191 14.6532 0.0228 0.6777 0.6777 0.6235 0.6235 0.0000 2,207.210 2,207.210 0.7139 2,225.057 9 9 3 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 3.7 Paving - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Category Ib/day Ib/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0692 i 0.0450 i 0.5098 1.5600e- i 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- i i 155.8274 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0692 0.0450 0.5098 1.5600e- 0.1677 1.2400e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1400e- 0.0456 155.7227 155.7227 4.1900e- 155.8274 003 003 003 003 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 4.2 Trip Summary Information ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 Ib/day Mitigated •i 0.8190 i 23.5424 i 6.4553 i 0.0787 i 2.3651 i 0.1428 i 2.5079 i 0.6659 i 0.1366 0.8025 8,436.300 � 8,436.300 i 0.4519 8,447.597 4 i 4 i i i 7 Unmitigated 0.8190 23.5424 6.4553 0.0787 2.3651 0.1428 2.5079 0.6659 0.1366 0.8025 8,436.300 - 8,436.300 - 0.4519 8,447.597 4 4 7 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT General Office Building ......................................------------ Parking Lot Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail + 5.52 ; 0.00 �; 66.20 ; 5.52 5.52 -------------------- ; 0.00 0.00 ; 66.20 66.20 65,711 -----------------------:-------------------------- 898,864 65,711 898,864 Total 71.72 71.72 71.72 964,575 964,575 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose Land Use I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW IH -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by General Office Building 40.00 40.00 1 40.00 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 ................ ...... .�-----------t ------- T... 40.00 40.00 1 - 40.00 r ------------------r ----------------------- -------- ---------------- 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Refrigerated Warehouse No 40.00 40.00 40.00 59.00 0.00 41.00 92 5 3 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MY SBUS MH General Office Building 0.000000+ 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.160000; 0.000000; 0.230000; 0.610000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000; 0.000000 - 0.000000 r Parking Lot 0.000000+ 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.1600001 0.0000001 0.2300001 0.6100001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.0000001 0.000000 0.000000 r Refrigerated Warehouse -No Rail, 0.000000. 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.160000, 0.000000, 0.230000, 0.610000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000, 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx I CO I SO2 I Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day NaturalGas •i 0.1476 i 1.3414 i 1.1267 8.0500e- i i 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 11,609.628 1 0.0309 i 0.0295 1 1,619.194 Mitigated ;i 003 . i 8 1 8 1 i 0 NaturalGas 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0500e- - 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 0.1019 1,609.628 - 1,609.628 0.0309 - 0.0295 1,619.194 Unmitigated 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 I IPM2.5Total INBio-CO2 I Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I i 76.0548 •1 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 1 6.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- 1 8.9476 1 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- i 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 I 1 004 004 ; I I 1 004 � 004 � I � I I I I I I I 1 • I I 1 1---------�-------'-------------------------------------------------------- 1------------------------------ I I I I I I I I 1- I I I Parking Lot 0 •I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 I '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 • I 1 '1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Refri erated • t ------4I i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i------- i-------*------- t------- 1 i-------i-------i-------*------- Refrigerated 13605.8 •I 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r 11,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 1 Warehouse -No ;1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 r I 1 I I I 003 1 2 Rail Total 1.3414 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 003 003 8 8 8 8 0 0 Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I PM10 I PM10 I Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Land Use kBTU/yr Ib/day Ib/day General Office I I I I I I I I I I I 10.0760548■I 8.2000e- 1 7.4600e- 16.2600e- 1 4.000Oe- I 15.7000e- 1 5.7000e- I 1 5.7000e- 5.7000e- • 1 8.9476 I 8.9476 1 1.7000e- 1 1.6000e- 1 9.0008 Building 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 I 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 ; i I 1 004 1 004 I I I I I I I 1 • I I I t �1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I *------- Parking Lot , 0 .1 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I I 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 1 0.0000 0.0000 • 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- - - Refri erated 13.6058 �i 0.1467 1 1.3339 1 1.1205 1 8.000Oe- I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 I 1 0.1014 1 0.1014 r i 1,600.681111,600.68111 0.0307 1 0.0294 1,610.193 Warehouse -No 1 ;1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 } I 1 I 1 I 003 I 2 I 1 I I Rail Total 0.1476 1.3414 1.1267 8.0400e- 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 0.1020 1,609.628 1,609.628 0.0309 0.0295 1,619.194 11 003 8 8 0 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG I NOx I CO I SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category Ib/day Ib/day Mitigated •i 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 i 004 i i 005 005 005 i 005 . 004 i Unmitigated 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 - 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i � 0.0000 0.0000 � Coating '� ■ i -- - - - - - - - - -%i- - ------ ---- -- --- ---- ------- ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ ------- +- - - - - - -i- - - - - -- ---- ----- ----------- Consumer •1 2.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- � i 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- � 0.0427 i � i i � i � i � i � 003 004 005 005 005 005 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 Mitigated 7.0 Water Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Total Bio -0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Subcategory Ib/day Ib/day Architectural •i 0.2664 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating'� ■ ' i -- - - - - - - - - -%i- - ------ ---- -- --- ---- ------- ---- - -- -- - ----------- i - - - - - - - j -- ------ ------- +- - - - - - -i- - - - - -- ---- ----- ----------- Consumer •i 2.0693 i i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 Products Landscaping •i 1.7700e- i 1.7000e- i 0.0188 i 0.0000 i i 7.000Oe- i 7.000Oe- i i 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 i 0.0400 i 1.1000e- 0.0427 003 004 005 005 005 005 . 004 i Total 2.3375 1.7000e- 0.0188 0.0000 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 7.000Oe- 0.0400 0.0400 1.1000e- 0.0427 004 005 005 005 005 004 7.0 Water Detail CaIEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 31 Date: 3/26/2020 1:33 PM 9471 - 8545 Pecan Avennue - Proposed Warehouse - Trucks - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumas and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Start date and time 03/26/20 14:39:04 AERSCREEN 16216 Xebec Warehouse Construction Xebec Warehouse Construction ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ----------------- METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** --------------- Emission Rate: 0.423E-02 g/s Area Height: 3.00 meters Area Source Length: 199.00 meters Area Source Width: Vertical Dimension: Model Mode: Population: Dist to Ambient Air: ** BUILDING DATA ** 97.00 meters 1.50 meters URBAN 177452 0.336E-01 lb/hr 9.84 feet 652.89 feet 318.24 feet 4.92 feet 1.0 meters 3. feet No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2020.03.26 XebecWarehouse Construction.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 03/26/20 14:40:39 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 03/26/20 14:40:50 REFINE started 03/26/20 14:40:50 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 03/26/20 14:40:51 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 03/26/20 14:40:53 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.55299E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60562E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64959E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68618E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.72506E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52796E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38446E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31351E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26250E+01 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22432E+01 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19477E+01 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17142E+01 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15257E+01 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13692E+01 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12401E+01 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11298E+01 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.10359E+01 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95445E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88346E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82160E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76714E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71796E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67399E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63465E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59926E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56727E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53788E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51107E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48655E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46405E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44319E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42393E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40610E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38957E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37413E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35962E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34607E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33340E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32155E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31038E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29989E+00 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29001E+00 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28069E+00 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27188E+00 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26355E+00 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25566E+00 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24813E+00 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24099E+00 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23420E+00 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22773E+00 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22156E+00 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21565E+00 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21000E+00 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20461E+00 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19946E+00 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19453E+00 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18982E+00 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18530E+00 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18096E+00 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17680E+00 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17280E+00 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16895E+00 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16526E+00 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16170E+00 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15827E+00 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15497E+00 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.15179E+00 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14872E+00 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14575E+00 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14289E+00 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14013E+00 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13745E+00 1775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13486E+00 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13330E+00 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13084E+00 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12846E+00 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12615E+00 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12391E+00 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12174E+00 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11963E+00 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11759E+00 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11560E+00 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11367E+00 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11180E+00 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10998E+00 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10821E+00 2125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10650E+00 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10482E+00 2175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10319E+00 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10161E+00 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10007E+00 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.98563E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97099E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.95672E-01 2325.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94281E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.92924E-01 2375.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91601E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.90310E-01 2425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.89051E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.87821E-01 2475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.86621E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85449E-01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.84304E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83185E-01 2575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.82092E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.81023E-01 2625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.79979E-01 2650.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78957E-01 2675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.77958E-01 2700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76980E-01 2725.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76024E-01 2750.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.75088E-01 2775.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74172E-01 2800.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73274E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72396E-01 2850.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.71536E-01 2875.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.70693E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69867E-01 2925.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.69058E-01 2950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68265E-01 2975.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.67487E-01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66725E-01 3025.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65977E-01 3050.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65244E-01 3074.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.64525E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63820E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63128E-01 3150.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.62448E-01 3174.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61781E-01 3199.99 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61127E-01 3225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60484E-01 3250.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59853E-01 3275.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.59234E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58625E-01 3325.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58027E-01 3350.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57439E-01 3375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56862E-01 3400.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56295E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55738E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55190E-01 3475.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54651E-01 3500.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.54121E-01 3525.00 0.00 25.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53600E-01 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53088E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52584E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52089E-01 3625.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51601E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51121E-01 3675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50649E-01 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50185E-01 3724.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49727E-01 3750.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49277E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48834E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48398E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47969E-01 3849.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47546E-01 3875.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47129E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46719E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46315E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45917E-01 3975.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45525E-01 4000.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45138E-01 4025.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44758E-01 4050.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44382E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44012E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43648E-01 4125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.43289E-01 4149.99 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42934E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42585E-01 4200.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42241E-01 4225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41901E-01 4250.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41566E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41236E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40910E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40589E-01 4350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40272E-01 4375.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39959E-01 4400.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39651E-01 4425.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39346E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39046E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38750E-01 4500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38457E-01 4525.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38168E-01 4550.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37883E-01 4575.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37602E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37324E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37050E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36779E-01 4675.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36512E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36248E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35987E-01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35730E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35475E-01 4800.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35224E-01 4825.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34976E-01 4850.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34731E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34489E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34250E-01 4924.99 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34013E-01 4950.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33780E-01 4975.00 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 310.0 2.0 0.33549E-01 5000.00 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 310.0 2.0 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 Start date and time 03/26/20 14:42:45 AERSCREEN 16216 Xebec Warehouse Operation Xebec Warehouse Operation ----------------- DATA ENTRY VALIDATION ----------------- METRIC ENGLISH ** AREADATA ** --------------- Emission Rate: 0.138E-02 g/s Area Height: 3.00 meters Area Source Length: 199.00 meters Area Source Width: Vertical Dimension: Model Mode: Population: Dist to Ambient Air: ** BUILDING DATA ** 97.00 meters 1.50 meters URBAN 177452 0.110E-01 lb/hr 9.84 feet 652.89 feet 318.24 feet 4.92 feet 1.0 meters 3. feet No Building Downwash Parameters ** TERRAIN DATA ** No Terrain Elevations Source Base Elevation: 0.0 meters 0.0 feet Probe distance: 5000. meters 16404. feet No flagpole receptors No discrete receptors used ** FUMIGATION DATA ** No fumigation requested ** METEOROLOGY DATA ** Min/Max Temperature: 250.0 / 310.0 K -9.7 / 98.3 Deg F Minimum Wind Speed: 0.5 m/s Anemometer Height: 10.000 meters Dominant Surface Profile: Urban Dominant Climate Type: Average Moisture Surface friction velocity (u*): not adjusted DEBUG OPTION ON AERSCREEN output file: 2020.03.26_XebecWarehouse_Operation.out *** AERSCREEN Run is Ready to Begin No terrain used, AERMAP will not be run ************************************************** SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS & MAKEMET Obtaining surface characteristics... Using AERMET seasonal surface characteristics for Urban with Average Moisture Season Albedo Bo zo Winter 0.35 1.50 1.000 Spring 0.14 1.00 1.000 Summer 0.16 2.00 1.000 Autumn 0.18 2.00 1.000 Creating met files aerscreen_01_01.sfc & aerscreen_01_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_02_01.sfc & aerscreen_02_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_03_01.sfc & aerscreen_03_01.pfl Creating met files aerscreen_04_01.sfc & aerscreen_04_01.pfl Buildings and/or terrain present or rectangular area source, skipping probe FLOWSECTOR started 03/26/20 14:43:39 ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Winter Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Winter sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Spring Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Spring sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Summer Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Summer sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ******************************************** Running AERMOD Processing Autumn Processing surface roughness sector 1 ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 1 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 2 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 5 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 3 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 10 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 4 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 15 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 5 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 20 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 6 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 25 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** ***************************************************** Processing wind flow sector 7 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for FLOWSECTOR stage 2 Autumn sector 30 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** FLOWSECTOR ended 03/26/20 14:43:50 REFINE started 03/26/20 14:43:50 AERMOD Finishes Successfully for REFINE stage 3 Winter sector 0 ******** WARNING MESSAGES ******** *** NONE *** REFINE ended 03/26/20 14:43:51 ********************************************** AERSCREEN Finished Successfully With no errors or warnings Check log file for details *********************************************** Ending date and time 03/26/20 14:43:53 Concentration Distance Elevation Diag Season/Month Zo sector Date H0 U* W* DT/DZ ZICNV ZIMCH M-0 LEN ZO BOWEN ALBEDO REF WS HT REF TA HT 0.18029E+01 1.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19745E+01 25.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21178E+01 50.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22371E+01 75.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 * 0.23639E+01 100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17213E+01 125.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12535E+01 150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10221E+01 175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85582E+00 200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.73135E+00 225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63502E+00 250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55888E+00 275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.49742E+00 300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44641E+00 325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40430E+00 350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36834E+00 375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.33774E+00 400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31118E+00 425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28803E+00 450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26786E+00 475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25011E+00 500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23407E+00 525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21974E+00 550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20691E+00 575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19537E+00 600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18495E+00 625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17536E+00 650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16662E+00 675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15863E+00 700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15129E+00 725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14449E+00 750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13821E+00 775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13240E+00 800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12701E+00 825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12197E+00 850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11724E+00 875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11283E+00 900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10870E+00 925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10483E+00 950.01 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.10119E+00 975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.97771E-01 1000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.94549E-01 1025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.91511E-01 1050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.88640E-01 1075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.85924E-01 1100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.83352E-01 1125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.80898E-01 1150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.78568E-01 1175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.76354E-01 1200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.74247E-01 1225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.72234E-01 1250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.70306E-01 1275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.68467E-01 1300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.66710E-01 1325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.65030E-01 1350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.63423E-01 1375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.61887E-01 1400.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.60413E-01 1425.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.58999E-01 1450.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.57641E-01 1475.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.56337E-01 1500.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.55084E-01 1525.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.53879E-01 1550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.52718E-01 1575.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.51601E-01 1600.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.50525E-01 1625.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.49487E-01 1650.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.48486E-01 1675.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.47520E-01 1700.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.46587E-01 1725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.45684E-01 1750.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.44811E-01 1775.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43968E-01 1800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.43461E-01 1825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.42658E-01 1850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41881E-01 1875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.41127E-01 1900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.40397E-01 1925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39689E-01 1950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.39003E-01 1975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.38336E-01 2000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37689E-01 2025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.37061E-01 2050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.36451E-01 2075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35857E-01 2100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.35281E-01 2125.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34720E-01 2150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.34175E-01 2175.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33644E-01 2200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.33127E-01 2225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32624E-01 2250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.32134E-01 2275.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31657E-01 2300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.31191E-01 2325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30738E-01 2350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.30296E-01 2375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29864E-01 2400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29444E-01 2425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.29033E-01 2450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28632E-01 2475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.28241E-01 2500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27858E-01 2525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27485E-01 2550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.27121E-01 2575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26764E-01 2600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26416E-01 2625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.26075E-01 2650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25742E-01 2675.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25416E-01 2700.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.25098E-01 2725.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24786E-01 2750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24481E-01 2775.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.24182E-01 2800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23889E-01 2825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23603E-01 2850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.23322E-01 2875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.23048E-01 2900.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22778E-01 2925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22515E-01 2950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22256E-01 2975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.22003E-01 3000.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21754E-01 3025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21510E-01 3050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21271E-01 3075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.21037E-01 3100.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20807E-01 3125.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20581E-01 3150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20360E-01 3175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.20142E-01 3200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19929E-01 3225.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19719E-01 3250.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19514E-01 3275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19312E-01 3300.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.19113E-01 3325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18918E-01 3350.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18727E-01 3375.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18539E-01 3400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18354E-01 3425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.18172E-01 3450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17993E-01 3475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17818E-01 3500.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17645E-01 3525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17475E-01 3550.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17308E-01 3575.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.17144E-01 3600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16982E-01 3625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16823E-01 3650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16667E-01 3675.00 0.00 30.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16513E-01 3700.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16361E-01 3725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16212E-01 3750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.16066E-01 3775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15921E-01 3800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15779E-01 3825.00 0.00 5.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15639E-01 3850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15501E-01 3875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15365E-01 3900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15232E-01 3925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.15100E-01 3950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14970E-01 3975.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14842E-01 4000.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14716E-01 4025.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14592E-01 4050.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14470E-01 4075.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14349E-01 4100.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.14230E-01 4125.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.14113E-01 4150.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13998E-01 4175.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13884E-01 4200.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13772E-01 4225.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13661E-01 4250.00 0.00 15.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13552E-01 4275.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13444E-01 4300.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13338E-01 4325.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13233E-01 4350.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13130E-01 4375.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.13028E-01 4400.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12927E-01 4425.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12828E-01 4450.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12730E-01 4475.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12633E-01 4500.00 0.00 10.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12538E-01 4525.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12444E-01 4550.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12351E-01 4575.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12259E-01 4600.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12169E-01 4625.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.12079E-01 4650.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11991E-01 4675.00 0.00 20.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11904E-01 4700.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11818E-01 4725.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11733E-01 4750.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11649E-01 4775.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11566E-01 4800.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11484E-01 4825.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11403E-01 4850.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11323E-01 4875.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11244E-01 4900.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11166E-01 4925.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11089E-01 4950.00 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 310.0 2.0 0.11013E-01 4975.00 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 310.0 2.0 0.10938E-01 5000.00 -1.30 0.043 -9.000 0.020 -999. 310.0 2.0 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 0.00 0.0 Winter 0-360 10011001 21. 6.0 1.000 1.50 0.35 0.50 10.0 IS p C Technical ConsuRation. DataAnalysis and G LiligakionSupportfor the Enxiroment Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP 1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa Santa Monica, California 90401 Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: mhagemann@swape.com Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 — present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 — 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001- 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - 1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 -1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 -1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 -1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy-making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: Supervised year-long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. Conducted aquifer tests. Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP -61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 0 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. E SWAPETechnical Consultation, data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Principal Environmental Chemist Education: SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405 Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Mobil: (310) 795-2335 Office: (310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email: prosenfeldng,swape.com Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on VOC filtration. M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience: Dr. Rosenfeld is the Co -Founder and Principal Environmental Chemist at Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE). His focus is the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, risk assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling, oil spills, boilers, incinerators and other industrial and agricultural sources relating to nuisance and personal injury. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources as they relate to human and ecological health. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing petroleum, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, PCBs, PAHs, dioxins, furans, volatile organics, semi -volatile organics, perchlorate, heavy metals, asbestos, PFOA, unusual polymers, MtBE, fuel oxygenates and odor. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated greenhouse gas emissions using various modeling programs recommended by California Air Quality Management Districts. Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex HZO Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 — 1999; Scientist James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Bureau of Land Management, Kremmling Colorado 1990; Scientist October 2015 1 Rosenfeld CV Publications: Chen, J. A., Zapata, A R., Sutherland, A. J., Molmen, D. R,. Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6),622-632. Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125. Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17),319-327. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing, Rosenfeld P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). Anatomy of an Odor Wheel. Water Science and Technology. Rosenfeld, P.E., Clark, J.J.J., Hensley A.R., Suffet, I.H. (Mel) (2007). The use of an odor wheel classification for evaluation of human health risk criteria for compost facilities. Water Science And Technology. October 2015 2 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS -6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29,1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(1-4),247-262. Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(l). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California. October 2015 3 Rosenfeld CV Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOXIN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. October 2015 4 Rosenfeld CV Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3 -TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. October 2015 5 Rosenfeld CV Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society ofAmerica. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. October 2015 6 Rosenfeld CV Teaching EXDerience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001. Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993. October 2015 7 Rosenfeld CV Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG 14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September, 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al. Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17`h Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-0 1 152-C Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant. Case Number cc- 11-01650-E Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio October 2015 8 Rosenfeld CV John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the Court of Common Pleas for the Second Judicial Circuit, State of South Carolina, County of Aiken David Anderson, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Norfolk Southern Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number: 2007 -CP -02-1584 In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010 In the Ninth Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides, State of Louisiana Roger Price, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Roy O. Martin, L.P., et al., Defendants. Civil Suit Number 224,041 Division G Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008 In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number 2:07CV 1052 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009 In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Carolyn Baker, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Chevron Oil Company, et al., Defendants. Case Number 1:05 CV 227 Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2008 In the Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Craig Steven Arabie, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants. Case Number 07-2738 G In the Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, State of Louisiana Leon B. Brydels, Plaintiffs, vs. Conoco, Inc., et al., Defendants. Case Number 2004-6941 Division A In the District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 153`' Judicial District Linda Faust, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Witco Chemical Corporation A/K/A Witco Corporation, Solvents and Chemicals, Inc. and Koppers Industries, Inc., Defendants. Case Number 153-212928-05 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2006, October 2007 Rosenfeld Trial: January 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino Leroy Allen, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Nutro Products, Inc., a California Corporation and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. John Loney, Plaintiff, vs. James H. Didion, Sr.; Nutro Products, Inc.; DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case Number VCVVSO44671 Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2009 Rosenfeld Trial: March 2010 In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant. Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011 October 2015 9 Rosenfeld CV In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Los Angeles Leslie Hensley and Rick Hensley, Plaintiffs, vs. Peter T. Hoss, as trustee on behalf of the Cone Fee Trust; Plains Exploration & Production Company, a Delaware corporation; Rayne Water Conditioning, Inc., a California Corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Case Number SC094173 Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2008, October 2008 In the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Santa Barbara, Santa Maria Branch Clifford and Shirley Adelhelm, et al., all individually, Plaintiffs, vs. Unocal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; Union Oil Company of California, a California corporation; Chevron Corporation, a California corporation; ConocoPhillips, a Texas corporation; Kerr-McGee Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation; and DOES 1 though 100, Defendants. Case Number 1229251 (Consolidated with case number 1231299) Rosenfeld Deposition: January 2008 In the United States District Court for Eastern District of Arkansas, Eastern District of Arkansas Harry Stephens Farms, Inc, and Harry Stephens, individual and as managing partner of Stephens Partnership, Plaintiffs, vs. Helena Chemical Company, and Exxon Mobil Corp., successor to Mobil Chemical Co., Defendants. Case Number 2:06 -CV -00166 JMM (Consolidated with case number 4:07CV00278 JMM) Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010 In the United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, Texarkana Division Rhonda Brasel, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Weyerhaeuser Company and DOES 1 through 100, Defendants. Civil Action Number 07-4037 Rosenfeld Deposition: March 2010 Rosenfeld Trial: October 2010 In the District Court of Texas 21st Judicial District of Burleson County Dennis Davis, Plaintiff, vs. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Rail Way Company, Defendant. Case Number 25,151 Rosenfeld Trial: May 2009 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant. Case 3: 1 0-cv-00622 Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013 October 2015 10 Rosenfeld CV 4/15/2020 City Council Meeting: Item J3. I Additional Correspondence MEMORANDUM To: Mr. Tabe Van Der Zwaag Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamunga cc: Shean Kim, Xebec Realty Date: 04/14/2020 imywra ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS From: Michael Nieto, San Diego Office Director, WRA Inc. Subject: Response to Design Review No. DRC2019-00590: Objection to CEQA Exemption Letter Dated April 10, 2020 To whom it may concern, The following is a summary of correspondence with RECON Environmental on April 14th, 2020 in response to the Design Review No. DRC2019-00590: Objection to CEQA Exemption letter dated April 10, 2020 written by Richard Drury and Page Fennie of LOZEAU DRURY LLP. Due to the tight timeline between Drury response and scheduled hearing the response is summarized from informal email correspondence. Original e-mail correspondence can be provided at request. For clarity, the refutations have been divided into separate subject groups, those relating to CEQA and those relating to Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. CEQA responses: They are misinterpreting the infill definition to state that, because this project is so similar to the surrounding businesses, there must be a cumulative impact. But, to comply with CEQA, cumulative impacts must evaluate past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects within the cumulative study area that would be constructed or commence operation during the timeframe of activity associated with the proposed project. Cumulative impacts under CEQA look at projects under the control of the current decision makers, not everything that has ever been constructed and operated in a City, County, etc. The project is truly exempt under CEQA so discussion of technical studies should not apply. Air Quality and GHG responses: • Page 5, a. The paved parking area was not included in the model. However, due to the size of the paved area, it is not anticipated that additional emissions due to paving off - gassing would result in a significant AQ impact since a majority of the emissions are due to vehicle and truck trips, and the parking lot itself is not the trip generator. • Page 5, b. The warehouse would not be refrigerated. 3033 5th Avenue, Suite 315, San Diego, CA 92103 ph:(858) 842-1800 info@wra-ca.com www.wra-ca.com • Page 6, c. The building construction and architectural coatings phases of construction dates were meant to overlap in the model, so that is an error. However, adjusting the dates would not result in greater architectural coating emissions and, as shown in Table 5 of the air report, the combined building construction and architectural coatings emissions would still be less than the emission thresholds. • Pages 8-10 2. 1 think we've provided a thorough response about health risks • Page 10 3. We provided a lot of detail previously on the flaws in their analysis • Pages 10-13 4. They state that we underestimate emissions for the same reasons on page 5. Paving emissions would be minimal and would not result in significant GHG impact. They also suggest that we should use the 3,000 MT threshold because the project includes in office use. This is incorrect because the office is an accessory use for the warehouse and necessary for warehouse operations, not an additional commercial use that would operate alongside the warehouse use. They question the use of the GHG threshold, but again, I think we've provided sufficient evidence. If you have any questions or comments regarding the refutations stated above, please don't hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, C-0mo-.0- Michael Nieto WRA San Diego Office Director 2 4/15/2020 City Council Public Hearing Item J3 — Revised Resolution No. 2020-025 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S DECISION TO APPROVE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 103,945 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING ON 4.75 ACRES OF LAND IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON THE EAST SIDE OF PECAN AVENUE SOUTH OF ARROW ROUTE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APN: 0229-171-02. A. Recitals. 1. Shean Kim, on behalf of Xebec Realty, filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2019-00590 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Resolution No. 20-15 approving the application and making findings in support of its decision. 3. On February 20, 2020, Lozeau Drury, LLP ("Appellant"), filed a timely appeal of the Planning Commission's decision approving the application. 4. On March 18, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga opened a duly noticed public hearing on the appeal and continued said hearing to its regular meeting of April 15, 2020. 5. On April 15, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reopened the public hearing regarding this appeal, conducted the public hearing, concluded said hearing on that date, and adopted this Resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's decision to approve the application and making findings in support thereof. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing on April 15, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a property generally located on the east side of Pecan Avenue, south of Arrow Route; and Resolution No. 2020-025 - Page 1 of 6 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 b. The subject property is located on the east side of Pecan Avenue and south of Arrow Route. The site is currently being used as a storage and maintenance yard for a trucking firm and includes multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. The parcel is approximately 660 feet from east to west and 330 feet from north to south, with an area of approximately 206,895 square feet (4.75 acres). The right-of-way improvements and utility undergrounding along Pecan Avenue have not been installed; and C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis for the building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Trucking Storage and Maintenance Facility General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District North Industrial Building, Single- Family Residences General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial GI District East Warehouse Building General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Trucking Firm General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District d. The proposed building will be of concrete tilt -up construction. The basic layout of the building will be typical for warehouse buildings. The primary (or long) axis for the building will be aligned west to east. The office area will be located at the southwest corner of the building. There will be a dock loading/storage area with 10 dock doors located at the rear (east side) of the building; and e. The project complies with all development standards including building and parking setbacks, floor area ratio and landscape coverage as shown on the following table: f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is requires 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback Street 25 Feet 70 Feet Yes Building Setback Side 5 Feet 40 and 50 Feet Yes Building Setback Rear 0 Feet 135 Feet Yes Parking Setback 15 Feet 45 Feet Yes Landscape Depth 25 Feet 33 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 Percent 10.8 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 50 — 60 Percent 50 Percent Yes Building Height* 35 — 75 Feet 40 Feet Yes *35 Feet at Minimum Setback (1 Foot Additional Height for Each 1 Foot of Additional Setback) f. The parking requirement for the project is based on the mix of office and warehouse floor areas in the building. The project is requires 79 vehicle parking spaces and 10 trailer parking spaces based on the proposed 8,000 square feet of office area and 95,945 square feet of warehouse area as shown in the following table: CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 3. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In - Fill Development Projects. In approving the application, the Planning Commission specifically concurred with the staff determination that the application is exempt from CEQA. The basis of the Appellant's appeal is that the Planning Commission erred in approving the application in reliance on the Class 32 exemption without conducting further environmental review. For the foregoing reasons, and based upon its independent judgment and all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council, the City Council finds that the application was properly exempt From CEQA pursuant to the Class 32 exemption and denies the appeal. Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Office Parking 8,000 SF 1:250 SF 32 Spaces 32 Spaces Warehouse Parking 1:1,000 for 1 sl 20,000 SF (95,945 SF) 1:2,000 for 2nd 20,000 SF 45 Spaces 47 Spaces 1:4,000 for the Remaining SF Total Vehicle Parking 77 Spaces 79 Spaces Trailer Parking 10 Dock High Doors 1 per Dock High Door 10 Spaces 10 Spaces 3. Based upon all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council during the above -referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct an industrial building of 103,945 square feet. The underlying General Plan designation is General Industrial (GI) District. b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, floor area ratio, parking, dock and storage area screening, landscape coverage, site planning, and architecture. d. The proposed project, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The potential land uses that would be associated with this project are consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all properties surrounding the subject property is General Industrial (GI) District. 4. The Planning Department staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines pursuant to the Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In - Fill Development Projects. In approving the application, the Planning Commission specifically concurred with the staff determination that the application is exempt from CEQA. The basis of the Appellant's appeal is that the Planning Commission erred in approving the application in reliance on the Class 32 exemption without conducting further environmental review. For the foregoing reasons, and based upon its independent judgment and all available evidence in the record and presented to this Council, the City Council finds that the application was properly exempt From CEQA pursuant to the Class 32 exemption and denies the appeal. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 a. The project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations. The project is a permitted use and complies with the development standards for the Industrial Park (IP) General Plan land use designation and zoning district, where the project site is located. This includes compatibility with the setback, height, lot coverage, and other design standards as described above. No variance was required for this Project. b. The proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. The site is 4.77 acres in size, and thus lower than the five -acre threshold. Furthermore, the surrounding properties are all fully developed with urban uses, including residential and other industrial uses on all other adjacent properties as described above. Thus, the project site is surrounded by urban uses on all sides. C. The project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. A Biological Resource Assessment (BRA) (WRA; August 2019) was prepared for the project site. The project site does not include any natural habitats and is surrounded by development. The BRA determined that the project site does not contain drainage features, ponded areas, wetlands or riparian habitats that would be under the jurisdiction of federal, state or local agencies. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. i. Traffic: A Trip Generation Analysis (Ganddini Group; August 8, 2019) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The project site is presently being used by a truck repair and storage operation which generates an estimated 242 daily vehicle trips. The proposed warehouse distribution use will create an estimated 237 daily trips or a 5 -trip reduction from current conditions Based on the reduction in daily trips, it was determined that the project was below the 50 peak hours trips that would necessitate a Traffic Impact Analysis and therefore no significant traffic impact is created by the project. ii. Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Recon; August 16, 2019) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the construction and operational noise levels would not exceed the City's noise thresholds. iii. Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analyses (Recon: August 21, 2019) were prepared for the project. The analyses determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases. Therefore, the project does not cause a significant impact relating to air quality or greenhouse gases. iv. Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (CA Engineering, Inc.; November 5, 2019) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 f. The City Council finds that the project does not involve an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Based on the foregoing studies and other evidence in the record, the City Council finds that the project will not result in a significant effect on the environment. Furthermore, the City Council finds that the project itself does not involve any unusual circumstances. The project site is currently occupied by an industrial use on land designated for industrial uses in the City's General Plan and the City's Zoning Map. The current use is a storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm, and the site contains multiple metal buildings and portable office modules. Thus, there is little change in the nature of the current facility and the project being frequented by trucks. In addition, the project is similar in nature and size to the surrounding industrial uses and warehouses. The enclosed warehouses will improve the aesthetics of the neighborhood and reduce on-site noise compared to the outdoor trucking facility currently occupying the site. g. The City Council finds that the project will not result in a cumulatively significant air quality impact due to successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time. The City Council concurs with the staff finding that air quality impacts will remain the same, if not improve, due to the fact that industrial facilities already exist in the immediate area. i. The project would replace an existing storage and maintenance yard operated by a trucking firm. The Project's Trip Generation Analysis prepared by the Ganddini Group concluded that the existing trucking facility actually generates more traffic than the Project is expected to generate. Therefore, a reduction in vehicle criteria pollutant emissions below what is currently generated should be expected. Furthermore, the project would be constructed in accordance with the 2019 Energy Code. For non-residential buildings, it is estimated that the 2019 standards will decrease energy consumption by 30 percent compared to the previous 2016 Energy Code. This should help reduce pollutant emissions below the current baseline and avoid any cumulative air quality impact. ii. Varied locations and schedules for construction of other projects in the City render it unlikely construction activities would overlap, thereby avoiding significant cumulative construction air quality impacts on sensitive receptors. iii. The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared by Recon determined that the project would not cause a significant air quality impact associated with construction equipment, diesel trucks, and other vehicles associated with the Project. The thresholds utilized in this analysis were developed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These thresholds are used to determine whether a Project contributes to a significant cumulative impact because they review projects on a basin -wide level. Given that no significant air quality impact was found, the Class 32 exemption is appropriate. 5. Based upon the findings, evidence, and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, the City Council hereby denies the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision DRC2020- 00076 and upholds the Planning Commission's decision to approve Design Review DRC2019- 00590. This Resolution amends Planning Department Condition #3 of Planning Commission Resolution of Approval #20-15 as follows: The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2020-025 DRC2019-00590 — SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY April 15, 2020 a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of his obligations under this condition. In the event such a legal action is filed, the City shall estimate its expenses for litigation. The applicant shall deposit such amount with the City or enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 6. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on April 15, 2020. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Shean Kim for Xebec Realty Appeal of DRC2019-00590 April 15, 2020 Approval History • On February 12, 2020, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2019-00590 for the construction of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building; • Prior to that meeting, correspondence was received from Lozeau Drury, LLP, raising concerns related to staff's determination that the project was categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); • The Planning Commission reviewed the correspondence from Lozeau Drury, LLP, and determined that the staff's CEQA determination was appropriate and approved the project; • On February 20, 2020, an appeal of the Planning Commission approval was received from Lozeau Drury, LLP, within the 10 -day appeal period. Ill1y Jri, Project Site I a "41 m v mm n� . I r T ..- - —. - _ ,cow •.: ��•,+Y�- .. �: 3z1' - Site Plan L - ------ . CF:VP CY:VP CP:VP: CF:V'P ' BUILDING AREA •_ F007PRINT: 109,269 SF M EZZANIN E: 4,000 SF A G.F.A.: 104,269 SIF ! '....Mx�...... i i a CPNP CPN? s= .., —. _ -__ occu•ancr es. ;nrsm�cnor me ae xl.u���oGsro�iEsx - -- n., + . _ UNP 8 ....................... .........................: ------------------------ m 'IL9 r r CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Appeal Overview • The basis of the appellant's appeal is that the project does not qualify for CEQA's Class 32 categorical exemption and, therefore, additional environmental review is required before the project may be approved; • A project that qualifies for a categorical exemption has been determined to be of a type that does not cause a significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the provisions of CEQA; • The Class 32 categorical exemption applies to "in -fill" development that meet the following limitations: - It is consistent with the general plan and zoning regulations; - It occurs in the city limits on no more than 5 acres surrounded by urban uses; - It has no value as habitat for endangered, rear or threatened species; - The approval of the project will not result in significant effect relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; - It is adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Appellant's Argument • The appellant asserts that the Class 32 categorical exemption is inapplicable in this case because the project (1) may have significant impact to human health from diesel particulate matter; and (2) may have significant impact related to greenhouse gasses; • CEQA categorical exemptions are subject to six exceptions listed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2. If one of these exceptions applies, then the categorical exemption is inapplicable to the project and further environmental review would be required. The appellant argues that the following two exceptions disqualify the Project from relying on the Class 32 categorical exemption: (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. Unusual Circumstances • The appellant asserts that the Class 32 exemption is inapplicable because a categorical exemption may not be "used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances;" • Staff believes that there are no unusual circumstances associated with the Project that could cause a significant environmental effect for the following reasons: - The proposed warehouse will have similar truck traffic to the current truck storage and maintenance yard on the project site. - The proposed warehouse is of similar size and nature to the surrounding industrial uses. - There proposed warehouse will improve aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood and reduce on-site noise by moving most activities indoors. Cumulative Impacts • The appellant states that the Class 32 exemption is inapplicable to the project because "the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant;" • The Trip Generation Analysis prepared for the project concludes that the existing trucking facility generates more traffic than the Project is expected to generate, therefore, reducing vehicle criteria pollutant emissions below what is currently generated; • The Project will be constructed in accordance with the 2019 Energy Code, reducing energy consumption by 30 percent compared to the 2016 Energy Code. Cumulative Impacts (Air Quality) • The Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis prepared for the project determined that the project would not cause a significant air quality impact associated with construction equipment, diesel trucks, and other vehicles associated with the Project; • The thresholds utilized in this analysis were developed by the Southern California Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). These thresholds are used to determine whether a project contributes to a significant cumulative impact because they review projects on a basin -wide level. Given that no significant air quality impact was found, staff believes that the Class 32 exemption is still appropriate. Staff's Response and Conclusions Staff has independently reviewed the applicant's supporting evidence and finds that it supports the City's determination that the project is exempt from CEQA; Staff outlined in the original Planning Commission staff report that the project complies with each of the 5 "Infill" elements outlined for the Class 32 exemption; The applicant's environmental consultant, Recon Environmental, reviewed the appellant's letter and has prepared an analysis that supports the City's reliance on the Class 32 exemption and and why the two exceptions (Cumulative Impacts and Significant Effects) outlined in the appeal do not apply." DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO A ADOPT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL RATIFYING EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-2 OF THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution. BACKGROUND: On March 18, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution 2020-14, proclaiming the existence of a local emergency due to COVID-19 pursuant to Government Code Section 8630. On March 19, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-33-20, requiring all individuals to stay home except as needed to maintain critical infrastructure and other essential sectors. Pursuant to Chapter 2.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services, and is empowered to make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property impacted by the emergency, provided that the City Council ratifies those actions. On April 1, 2020, the City Council and Fire District Board of Directors adopted resolutions ratifying Executive Order 2020-1 of the Director of Emergency Services. These resolutions pertained to business license renewals, certain Fire District Fees, and refunds issued by the Community Services Department as a result of the COVID-19 emergency. ANALYSIS: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have an unprecedented impact on the economy that sustains our community. It is clear that the results will be significant as the economy almost certainly enters a recessionary period. In Rancho Cucamonga, with its strong service, retail, and restaurant sectors, the impacts are already being felt in declining business revenues resulting from temporary retail store closures, limits on restaurant operations, and temporary closures in the non-essential services sectors. It is in the best interests of the City and the business community to work with businesses to provide some level of financial relief where it is reasonably possible, in order to support these businesses as they seek to weather this economic storm and ultimately recover. A successful business community is essential for our City and its residents to continue to thrive in the future. On April 8, 2020, the City Manager, acting as the City's Director of Emergency Services, issued Executive Order 2020-2 to provide the following relief to Rancho Cucamonga businesses and residents: Page 693 • Animal license renewals will have a 120 day grace period before penalties for non-payment are imposed, instead of the standard grace period of 30 days. • For the month of April 2020, up to 50% of the tow services administrative fee due to the City may be deferred until December 1, 2020. • For businesses offering essential services, signs may be placed in the right-of-way in order to assist in communicating the availability of their services to the public. • RV's will be permitted to be occupied for the purpose of complying with public health orders for quarantines and isolation due to COVID-19, subject to certain restrictions. FISCAL IMPACT: Precise fiscal impacts on the City are difficult to estimate at this time. Deferral of 50% of the tow services administrative fee could result in a delayed payment of up to $18,000. The extension of the grace period for animal license renewals could result in a revenue loss of approximately $15,000 - 30,000. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item supports the Council's goal for mid and long-range planning, by supporting the community so that it might recover and rebuild from this unprecedented emergency. ATTACHMENTS: Description Attachment 1 - Resolution Attachment 2 - Executive Order 2020-2 Page 694 RESOLUTION NO. 2020-023 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES' EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-2 TO SUSPEND ANIMAL LICENSE PENALTIES, DEFER A PORTION OF TOW SERVICE AGREEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE FEES FOR THE MONTH OF APRIL, PERMIT SIGNAGE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR ESSENTIAL BUSINESSES, AND PERMIT THE USE OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES AND TRAILERS FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMPLYING WITH PUBLIC HEALTH ORDERS DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY CAUSED BY THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC A. RECITALS: 1. International, national, state, and local health and governmental authorities are responding to an outbreak of respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus named "SARS-CoV-2," and the disease it causes has been named "coronavirus disease 2019," abbreviated COVID-19, ("COVID-19"). 2. On March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California declared a state of emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and help the State prepare for broader spread of COVID-19. 3. On March 13, 2020, the President of the United States of America declared a national emergency and announced that the federal government would make emergency funding available to assist state and local governments in preventing the spread of and addressing the effects of COVID-19. 4. On March 17, 2020, the Health Officer of the County of San Bernardino issued a public health order to prohibit all public and private gatherings and require the closure of all bars, adult entertainment establishments, and other business establishments that do not serve food, as well as movie theatres, gyms, and health clubs in response to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. 5. On March 18, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted Resolution 2020-014, proclaiming the existence of a local emergency due to COVID-19 pursuant to Government Code Section 8630. 6. On March 19, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-33-20 to implement directives developed by the State Public Health Officer that require all individuals living in the State of California to stay at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure and other essential sectors. 7. Based on the foregoing, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health, and the San Bernardino County Department Page 695 of Public Health have all issued public health recommendations to the community including but not limited to staying home if sick, social distancing from non -family members, canceling or postponing events and gatherings, and taking other precautions to protect public health and prevent transmission of this communicable virus. 8. These public health recommendations and City orders impact daily life in the community as well as the livelihood and economic wellbeing of residents and businesses. 9. These orders have also resulted in the cancellation of various classes, activities, facility rentals, and theater programs offered by the City. 10. Loss of income as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City residents and businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including payment of business license renewals and Fire District fees. 11. Pursuant to Chapter 2.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services, and is empowered to make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property affected by such emergency; provided, however, such rules and regulations must be confirmed at the earliest practicable time by the City Council. 12. On April 8, 2020, the City Manager, acting in his capacity as the Director of Emergency Services, adopted Executive Order 2020-2 to suspend business license penalties and administrative citations during the current local emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Director determined that this action was in the interest of public health and safety. 13. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby find and resolve as follows - 1 . ollows: 1. Findings: a. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. b. The above described conditions warranted the Director of Emergency Services' actions to suspend business license penalties and administrative citations to counter the significant economic impacts of the public health orders currently affecting businesses within the City. 2. Ratification of Executive Order: Executive Order 2020-2 issued by the Director of Emergency Services on April 8, 2020, as attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby ratified and confirmed pursuant to Chapter 2.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code and Government Code Section 8634. Page 2 Page 696 3. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption. 4. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on April 15, 2020. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: /_1:1 •921ilk 14011J►us] lIOTA l21OTA l:321:6y1 ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Page 3 Page 697 EXHIBIT A EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-1 Page 4 Page 698 Mayor L. Dennis Michael I Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Council Members Ryan A. Hutchison, Kristine D. Scott, Sam Spagnolo City Manager John R. Gillison 10500 Civic Center Drive I Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 1 909.477.2700 1 www.CiyofRC.us EXECUTIVE ORDER 2020-2 OF THE DIRECTOR OF EMERGENCY SERVICES WHEREAS international, national, state, and local health and governmental authorities are responding to an outbreak of a respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus named "SARS-CoV-2," and the disease it causes has been named "Coronavirus Disease 2019," abbreviated COVID-19, ("COVID-19"); and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, the Governor of the State of California declared a state of emergency to make additional resources available, formalize emergency actions already underway across multiple state agencies and departments, and to help the State prepare for the broader spread of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 13, 2020, the President of the United States of America declared a national emergency and announced that the federal government would make emergency funding available to assist state and local governments in preventing the spread of and addressing the effects of COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2020, the Health Officer of the County of San Bernardino issued a public health order to prohibit all public and private gatherings and require the closure of all bars, adult entertainment establishments, and other business establishments that do not serve food, as well as movie theatres, gyms, and health clubs to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. On April 2, 2020, the Health Officer extended the order until such time that the Governor's Executive Order N-22-20 and the Health Officer's orders are rescinded; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted Resolution 2020-014, proclaiming the existence of a local emergency due to COVID-19; and WHEREAS, on March 19, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order N-33-20 to implement directives developed by the State Public Health Officer that require all individuals living in the State of California to stay at their place of residence except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure and other essential sectors; and WHEREAS, based on the foregoing, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the California Department of Public Health, and the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health have all issued public health recommendations to the community including, but not limited to, staying home if sick, social distancing from non - family members, canceling or postponing events and gatherings, and taking other precautions to protect public health and prevent transmission of this communicable virus; and Page 699 Executive Order 2020-2 — Director of Emergency Services Page 2 WHEREAS these public health directives and City orders impact daily life in the community, as well as the livelihood and economic well-being of residents and businesses; and WHEREAS, designated businesses are striving to provide some essential services to the community, such as providing meals and groceries, and have a need to inform the public about the availability of these services even during this emergency; and WHEREAS, loss of income as a result of COVID-19 may inhibit City residents and businesses from fulfilling their financial obligations, including payment of animal license renewals and the Tow Services Agreement administrative fees; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 2.36 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Manager is the Director of Emergency Services, and is empowered to make and issue rules and regulations on matters reasonably related to the protection of life and property as affective by such emergency; provided, however, such rules and regulations must be confirmed at the earliest practicable time by the City Council; and WHEREAS, in the interest of public health and safety, as affected by the emergency caused by the spread of COVID-19, it is necessary to exercise my authority pursuant to Section 2.36.060 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to issue this regulation related to the protection of life and property. NOW, THEREFORE, I, John R. Gillison, the Director of Emergency Services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby issue the following order to become effective immediately, subject to ratification as soon as practicable by the City Council. UWyntaT�:YKi711AV: a0j9MMYI l 1. Penalties for non-payment of animal license renewals will not be imposed until 120 days after the applicable renewal date. 2. For the month of April 2020, tow service operators may defer up to 50% of the tow services administrative fee due to the City until December 1, 2020. 3. For businesses offering essential services, as designated by the California Department of Public Health in its list of Essential Critical Infrastructure Workers, and open to the general public with modified service levels, signs may be placed in the right- of-way subject to these limitations: a. Temporary signs may be placed in the right-of-way and landscape areas of private property in the areas immediately adjacent to the business or shopping center. b. Signs must be free-standing and not attached to any existing structure, except signs may be attached to any previously permitted sign of the business. C. A business may place one banner or sign with two (2) display faces of 8' x 4' or not to exceed 32 square feet per side on each street frontage. d. A business may place an additional four signs with two (2) display faces, not to exceed 9 square feet per side, on each street frontage. Page 700 Executive Order 2020-2 — Director of Emergency Services Page 3 e. Signs shall not be placed to create a hazard for pedestrians or drivers, including line -of -sight obstructions. 4. Recreational vehicles and trailers designed for human habitation may be occupied for purposes of complying with State, County, and City public health orders to social distance, quarantine, or isolate due to COVID-19. When utilized for this purpose, the vehicle or trailer may be located in a driveway or other paved parking area intended for vehicles on private property. For properties which are unable to accommodate the vehicle or trailer on a driveway or paved parking area, the vehicle or trailer may be located on the street. All occupancy shall be subject to the following requirements: a. Equipment must be located adjacent to or nearly adjacent to the property where registered or the permanent home address of the occupant. b. Occupants must have access to the associated residence for sanitation purposes. C. The equipment may be connected to electricity, but generators are prohibited. d. There can be no obstruction of streets, driveways or pedestrian access. e. Trailers on the street must be stabilized and anchored to prevent unintended movement. f. Equipment parked on the street and utilized for social distancing, quarantining, or isolation shall not be subject to 72 -hour restrictions (RCMC 10.44.130) or overnight parking restrictions (RCMC 10.64). g. This order shall not apply to box trailers, specialized equipment trailers, or any other restricted vehicle which is not designed for human habitation. 5. This Order shall take effect immediately and shall remain in effect until the local emergency declared by the City Council, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, is concluded, at which time it will automatically expire unless extended or expressly superseded by a duly enacted Resolution of the City Council or by a further Order by the Director of Emergency Services. ADOPTED—th.i 8th da of A ril, BY: John R. Gillison Director of Emergency Services APPROVED AS TO FORM: Janice Reynolds, City Clerk ATTEST: James Markman, City Attorney Page 701 Resolutions Ratifying Emergency Executive Order 2020-2 Presented to the City Council April 15, 2020 COVI D-19 Emergency Actions: • March 4 —Governor declares a state of emergency • March 18 -City Council proclaims local emergency, adopts urgency ordinance to prohibit evictions • March 25 —Emergency Executive Order 2020-1 is issued by the Director of Emergency Services (City Manager) • April 1—City Council and Fire Board ratify Emergency Executive Order 2020-1 • April 8 —Order 2020-2 is issued Summary of Executive Order 2020-2: • Provides more time to pay animal license renewals — 120 day grace period instead of 30 days • For the month of April, tow carriers can defer up to 50% of their administrative fee to December 1, 2020 Summary of Executive Order 2020-2: • Allows temporary signs in the right of way for essential businesses, with limitations — • Must be immediately adjacent to the business • Limited to 1 large sign with two display faces, plus 4 smaller signs with two displace faces on each • Cannot create hazards for pedestrians or drivers Summary of Executive Order 2020-2: • Allows use of RV's to comply with orders to social distance, isolate, or quarantine, with limitations — • May be on the driveway or other paved area; or in the street • Must be adjacent to the property of the occupant's residence • Occupants must have access to the residence for sanitation purposes • May connect to electricity; no generators Must be stabilized/anchored to prevent movement Next steps: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the resolution ratifying Emergency Order 2020-2 DATE: April 15, 2020 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION TO APPROVE THE CITY COUNCIL MISSION, VISION, VALUES, GOALS, AND CODE OF ETHICS; AND TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF COMMITMENT TO UNIFIED GOVERNANCE. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve the City Council Mission, Vision, Values, Goals, and Code of Ethics; and adopt the Resolution of Commitment to Unified Governance. BACKGROUND: The City Council has traditionally held annual team -building and goal setting sessions. Continuing in this tradition, a series of workshops were held beginning in January 2019. Workshop topics included reviewed models for governance and the impacts of governance in a Council Districts framework; identifying our core values; discussing and defining our mission, vision, and values; and clarifying roles and communication. The Council also discussed the Core Strengths framework for understanding our Motivational Value Systems (MVS), and how understanding our MVS and behaviors help to improve communication. These sessions concluded on February 25, 2020, with the direction to bring the outcome to a regular City Council meeting for formal adoption. ANALYSIS: Analysis It is recommended that the City Council consider and approve the following statements and documents that have resulted from the team -building sessions: Mission Statement A Mission Statement establishes an organization's purpose — who it is, what it does, and for whom it exists. As Simon Sinek famously says, it defines our "why". The best mission statements are short, easy to understand, and focus on the ends instead of the means. A good mission statement should also focus on what the organization is doing in the present. Prior Councils had adopted a Mission Statement that was less clear, and arguably included multiple mission statements that overlapped to some degree. The Council has now worked to develop an updated Mission Statement over the course of several sessions. The new Mission Statement is concise and clear, like many well-known mission statements from the private and public sectors around the world. The Mission Statement is as follows: Ensure and Advance the Quality of Life for the Community through Inclusive Decision Making. Vision Statement A vision is the thing you are trying to achieve; it is what we hope to accomplish in the long term. Put another way, a Vision Statement should define the end state or goal the organization would like to Page 702 accomplish. The Vision Statement complements the Mission Statement. The mission defines what the organization is doing in the present, and the vision states what we want to achieve in the longer term. In developing the Vision Statement, the Council discussed a number of key priorities for our community that are important, such as public safety, economic vitality, quality community amenities, and a focus on both seniors and youth. Following a series of visioning exercises and discussions, the resulting vision statement is meant to encompass all these into an overarching vision for the community. The Vision Statement is as follows: Our vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive. Core Values Values provide a framework for decision-making because they identify what is most important to the organization. The Council worked through a values exercise, identifying what the most important values were to the organization. The resulting list of values provides a bridge between the Mission and Vision Statements. As the City carries out its mission and works towards its vision, it will be guided by these Core Values. The Core Values are as follows: 1. Providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all. 2. Promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. 3. Building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. 4. Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. 5. Equitable prosperity for all. 6. Working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. 7. Continuous improvement 8. Actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input. "All" is meant to be inclusive of residents, businesses, non -profits, schools, other government institutions — truly all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders. Code of Ethics In 2015, the City Council adopted some norms for its conduct. After some discussion at the workshops, the Council determined that it would like to go further and adopt a values -based Code of Ethics (Attachment 1). Guided by the Institute for Local Government's (ILG) work on this subject, this Code of Ethics is meant to go beyond the requirements of the law to encourage the highest standards of behavior; to promote public trust; to guide Council Members in their day-to-day service of the City; and to help on -board new members of the Council in the future. The Code of Ethics will be revisited at future Council team - building workshops and revised as needed. Governance Resolution The City Council and staff discussed the Council -Manager model of governance that is established in General Law cities in California, and the potential impacts on governance as the City transitions into a Council Districts structure. It was the Council's desire to ensure that Rancho Cucamonga continues the tradition of thoughtful, stable governance, with a City Council that works together in the best interests of the City, regardless of how its members are elected. The proposed Resolution of Commitment to Unified Governance (Attachment 2) outlines how the City Council intends to govern and communicate with staff and all stakeholders, working together as a whole. Goals This year, the City Council looked to identify a narrow set of strategic goals to accomplish in the coming 1-3 years. These goals are in addition to the work plans that City departments have for operations and capital improvements that are considered annually through the budget process. Please note that since the goals were first discussed, Goal #1 has already been completed. The Council Goals are as follows: 1. Determine an official City position on the Gold Link and Gold Link issues in Q1 of 2020. (completed February 2020). 2. Within 1-3 years, obtain funding for another phase of Central Park. Page 703 I Complete the General Plan and Housing Element through an inclusive process by Q4 2022. 4. Attract new businesses to increase ongoing net revenue by $500,000 in the next two calendar years. 5. Reduce delays for N/S traffic flow on the Haven Avenue corridor between the 10 freeway and the 210 freeway, particularly during peak congestion periods, by working with the City of Ontario and the San Bernardino County Transportation Agency to implement advanced technology for traffic control communication and control systems by December 2023. 6. Complete the ALPR ring around Rancho Cucamonga, including all turn movements at all freeway on/off ramps and key major interior intersections by 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item supports the Council's goal for mid and long-range planning, by providing a framework that helps to define the organization's mission, vision, values, goals, and norms for governance. ATTACHMENTS: Description Code of Ethics Governance Resolution Page 704 Rancho Cucamonga City Council Code of Ethics Adopted April 1, 2020 The effective operation of democratic institutions requires that public officials enjoy the trust and confidence of the individuals and businesses they serve. Accordingly, the City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted this code to: 1. Encourage the highest standards of behavior, going beyond the requirements of the law; 2. Promote and maintain public trust and confidence; and 3. Provide an ongoing source of guidance to members of the City Council in their day-to-day service to Rancho Cucamonga. 4. Provide a seamless integration process for new members of the City Council. This Code of Ethics is based on our most important core values as a City Council. As part of our service to the City, we agree to live out the values in this Code through our day-to-day service to this world class community, and use it to assist and guide our decision-making. This Code will be reviewed on a regular basis, and the City Council will consider updating the Code as necessary. 1. Core Value: Integrity/Honesty Expressions (in practice, what this Value looks like): • 1 am honest with my fellow elected officials, the public, and others. 1 am truthful, do what I say I will do, and am dependable. • 1 am trustworthy, acting with the utmost integrity and moral courage. • 1 make impartial decisions, and extend equal opportunities and due process to all parties in matters under consideration. • 1 am fair, distributing benefits and burdens according to consistent and equitable criteria. • 1 take responsibility for my actions, even when it is uncomfortable to do so. • 1 am prepared to make difficult decisions when I am confident the public's best interests requires it. Examples of when this issue arises: • When I am asked a question, I will share the facts, even if the other person may not want to hear them. • If I offend someone, I will apologize and own my mistake. 2. Core Value: Respect for Fellow Officials, Staff, and the Public Expressions (in practice, what this Value looks like): • During public meetings and within the community, I will treat my fellow officials, staff, and the public with patience, courtesy, and civility, even when we disagree on what is best for the community. Especially when we disagree, we will still 1 Page 705 acknowledge that, generally, people have the best of intentions and are interested in the betterment of the community. • 1 will communicate that all Councilmembers are Team Rancho; we work for all residents, and despite being elected by districts, we act as a whole. • 1 will work towards consensus -building and gain value from diverse opinions. • 1 engage in effective two-way communication by being approachable, listening carefully, being open-minded, and determining an appropriate response that adds value to the conversation. • 1 will support a positive work environment for our staff. Examples of when this issue arises: • 1 will show respect by giving priority to my City commitment, doing my homework and coming to meetings prepared. At City Council meetings, I will provide my input from the dais and not as public comment, out of respect for my colleagues and the office I hold. When discussing contentious issues, I will approach discussions assuming that many people will have pieces of answers, and that cooperation will lead to workable solutions for the most difficult problems. • 1 will involve staff in meetings with individuals, both those with business before the agency and others, to ensure proper staff support and keep staff informed • When disagreeing with someone, I can still acknowledge our mutual good intentions for the community while expressing my opinions. 3. Core Value: Responsibility (Community Service and Proper Use of Public Resources) Expressions (in practice, what this value looks like): As a representative of the community, I serve as a model of leadership and civility, and provide courteous and professional service to everyone. • 1 apply my knowledge and expertise to my City work and to the interpersonal relationships that are a part of my role in a consistent, competent, positive and productive manner. • 1 actively promote the efficient and economical use of public resources, recognizing that the responsibility for making both large and small decisions about the use of public resources is a public trust. • 1 make decisions after prudent consideration of their financial impact, taking into account the long-term financial needs of the City, especially its financial stability. • 1 do not use information that I acquire in my public capacity for any personal advantage. Examples of when this issue arises: • 1 will work to allocate resources in a way that supports the City's long-range vision and provides residents with the best programs and services. • If the community is in need of a new service, I will consider that other services may have to be phased out in order to make room for these changing priorities; services cannot always expand or continue indefinitely without considering their impacts. 2 Page 706 4. Core Value: Compassion Expressions (in practice, what this Value looks like): • 1 am attuned to, and care about, the needs and issues of citizens, public officials, and City staff. • 1 act in a cooperative manner with groups and other individuals, working together in a spirit of tolerance, empathy and understanding. • 1 convey the City's care for and commitment to the people of our community. • 1 am sensitive to the fact that some people in the community may be intimidated by public officials and agencies, so I will strive to make their interactions with our agency as stress -free and productive as possible. Examples of when this issue arises: • 1 listen carefully to community feedback, and connect people to the City Manager or other appropriate staff to address their needs in a timely manner. • 1 seek to hear from diverse voices, recognizing that some in our community may not be as vocal as others, but that their needs and opinions are just as important. 3 Page 707 RESOLUTION NO. 20- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, STATING ITS COMMITMENT TO UNIFIED GOVERNANCE Whereas, the City of Rancho Cucamonga was incorporated in 1977 with the goal of uniting the three communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda into a new community; and Whereas, our City has always been, from the start, the "City with A Plan", working as a collaborative City Council to have vision for the future and to work together toward that vision; and Whereas, our City was forced by litigation to enact City Council Districts in 2016, which for the first time divided our City so that each Council Member is elected by District, instead of by the voters at large; and Whereas, while this change was not actively pursued, ultimately the City Council is committed to representation for all and determined to continue the tradition of thoughtful, stable governance, working together in the best interests of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, regardless of how its members are elected; Now, therefore, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: 1. The City Council reaffirms that we are committed to work together respectfully, and to govern as a whole body, not as individuals, in accordance with the principles of good governance and out of respect for the Council -Manager form of government. 2. We recognize that a Council election district is not a political subdivision; the Mayor and each Council Member is obligated by the Municipal Code and the oath they take to represent the entire City and all its citizens. To that end, regardless of how we are each elected or where we reside in Rancho Cucamonga, we are committed to making best decisions with the interests of the entire community in mind, hearing from residents across the City, and giving equal consideration to issues and people inside and outside our districts. 3. As an important part of this commitment, we agree to have a healthy debate and discussion regarding issues before us, and once a decision is made by the City Council, we will all work to support that decision, regardless of whether or not we initially supported that decision, recognizing that we are all desirous of good outcomes for the City and its stakeholders and that disunity brings divisiveness. 4. Each Councilmember will engage fully with regard to each City issue before us, regardless of which district or districts might be most directly impacted by the issue, and provide Page 708 assistance to any and all stakeholders, without regard to which District they might reside, but with respect and thoughtfulness to the Councilmembers and residents of that District. 5. We agree that City resources, both financial and personnel, will be allocated based on the City's overall needs, and not simply divided by Districts; we will not work individually outside of the collective governance process to resolve these issues, but refer them to and discuss them with the City Manager for appropriate follow-up. We will not use City resources to conduct meetings or similar activities for individual self promotion only in our District, as that would serve to divide and not unite our community. 6. We will seek to raise issues and concerns with the Mayor and City Manager so that our team is informed and no one is surprised by an issue. When we have questions or need information, we will work through the City Manager or our Department Directors rather than consulting other staff. 7. We agree to represent the City at meetings as events in pairs or larger groups, whether we are invited to or are hosting the meeting or event. This is to reinforce our functioning as a team, rather than attending meetings or events alone. 8. We are committed to superior customer service and excellence in governance, while paying attention to all neighborhoods and being mindful of our Districts. We will continue to move from "I" to "we", working together for the greater good. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this first day of April, 2020. L. Dennis Michael, Mayor I, JANICE C. REYNOLDS, CITY CLERK of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on April 1, 2020. AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: Page 709 ATTEST: Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Page 710 Page 711 Summary of Accomplishments Mission Statement Vision Statement CoreValues Resolution of Council Goals Code of Ethics Unified Governance kh- w Great leaders must have two things: a vision of the world that does not yet exist and the ability to communicate that vision clearly. Core Values Meant to go bridge the mission and vision statements "All" is meant to be inclusive of residents, businesses, non -profits, schools, other government institutions — truly all Rancho Cucamonga stakeholders r- Ethics Code Core Values Integrity/Honesty Respect for fellow officials, staff, and the public Responsibility (community service and proper use of public resources) am IF YOU WANT TO GO QUICKLY, GO ALONE. IF Y00 WANT TO GO FAR. GO TOG HER. AFRICAN PROVERB Commitment to govern as a whole body, not as individuals Governance Resolution Recognizing that Council districts are not political subdivisions; Mayor and each Council Member represents the Highlights ' entire city and all its citizens Commitment to making decisions with the interests of the entire community in mind, hearing from residents across the City, and giving consideration to issues and people inside and outside our districts Healthy debate and discussion on the issues, then supporting the decisions of the Council Governance Resolution Highlights - Engaging fully on each City issue before the Council, regardless of which district(s) might be most directly impacted Allocating City resources based on the City's overall needs, and not simply divided by Districts Raise issues and concerns with Mayor and City Manager; working through the appropriate channels to keep everyone informed Represent the City together with other Councilmembers at events or meetings, in order to reinforce functioning as a team Commitment to superior customer service and excellence in governance, while paying attention to all neighborhoods and being mindful of our Districts -F MAKE GET5� .- GOAL PL H f4 -ro WOR K STS cK : -� TO OT ' vOA L '.�•� _- + -- - - zkvivam 1 ILTALWO1 I I f to I l ti Spe Ci fic Me@ su rab Le Ac hi a vable R eal is tic rp 0 ml 9' =% fetter together