Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-05-27 Agenda Packet - PC-HPCHistoric Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 27, 2020 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID- 19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in -person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comment at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 871-6368-6235 .or - YOU CAN DIAL -IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 871-6368-6235 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of April 22, 2020. D. Public Hearings D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review along with the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. (Continued from April 22, 2020 HPC/PC meeting.) E. General Business E1. FY20/21 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) — Determination of conformance with the General Plan. E2. General Plan Update F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Workshops -None I. Adjournment If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(a�cityofrc.us by 12:00 PM on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. Planning Commission Agenda — May 27, 2020 Page 2of3 I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, May 21, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Planning Commission Agenda — May 27, 2020 Page 3 of 3 Vicinity Map Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Meeting i L E i i 19th 5t May 27, 2020 E J0 0 C -j L� Base Line Base Line J ifs Church Church Foothill - Foothill C 9D +' � Arrow Arrow J as c rsey s y j j 8th W ; v --• °� 6t h H 6th w C7 — nth 4th 7� Meeting Location: 40 City Hall/Council Chambers 10500 Civic Center Drive D1: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 - GEORGE BOTROS HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES APRIL 22, 2020 A. Call to Order The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 22, 2020. The meeting was called to order my Chairman Guglielmo at 7:00pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. Chairman Guglielmo asked Director McIntosh to explain the structure and format of tonight's meeting. Director McIntosh welcomed all to our first Zoom meeting. She took the time to explain how we are integrating our legal requirements and quasi-judicial procedures into this Zoom format. B. Public Communications Zacher Samaan, resident and member of Church, prayed for the well-being for everyone due to the difficult time we are all going through and prayed for commissioners to support this project. He spoke that he is in favor of D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. Amber Desire Dandouch, resident and member of Church and expressed she is in favor of Church project. Spoke regarding Item D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. Troy Hedger, residents, expressed his disappointment on the way notifications where sent out to the neighbors. Stating they did not receive anything about the Zoom meeting tonight. The residents deserve to be better notified. Jennifer Salhad, Sunday School Teacher at the Church, spoke regarding Item D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. She will hold her comments until then. Closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 11, 2020 One correction noted by Commission Morales on Page 3. Change $30,000 per year household to $30.00. Motion by Commission Dopp, second by Commission Williams; to approve Item C1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, to adopt the amended minutes. 005 D. Public Hearings D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review along with the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Morales asked about the access gate and is curious what the design would be because it is at the end of the residential street. Also, to make sure there will be a posted sign on the gate "emergency access only". His questions for staff, later during construction, the design of the gate will go to staff to approve. Tabe van der Zwaag answer yes, and it will also be reviewed by the Fire Department to meet their requirements. Commissioner Williams asked about the fiscal impact for the project, she thought Churches were exempt from property tax. Is that true. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney answered yes that is the law right now. George Botros, Architect, mentioned his goal on this project was to come up with good, attractive design, but very simple roof line. They like to work with surrounding area especially with mountain on one side and residential on other and very sensitive to the neighbors. Regarding the Social building is below any heights of custom house. No need to concern of the noise, he assures there will be no noise but just in case, he stated they will place sound barriers inside the walls. Commissioner Morales asked Mr. Botros, since we received letters from concerning residents of the project next to their neighborhood, during the gate design review, will they keep in mind to prevent people from parking in residential street and then walking into the Church property from the emergency access gate. Mr. Botros answered, nobody will park there. There's plenty of parking on Sunday's. Brian Sandona, Sr. Engineer spoke regarding Condition of Approval #3, would like to modify to allow the in -lieu fee as imposed to construction of the improvements on Wilson. Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing: Troy Penopolis, Civil Engineer for this project. Thanked everyone on this project. Available to answer any questions Commissioners may have on this development. No questions from Commissioners. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 2of9 Draft 006 For the Record, Correspondences received by the following residents: - Wayne & Karen Lee, residents, expressed their concerns regarding traffic and parking. Requesting to restrict activities to the hours of 0800 to 2100 hours. - Lisa and Jeff Unger, residents, expressed their concerns regarding traffic on East avenue and request a stop light at corner of East avenue and Philly drive. - Kunah Yoon, resident, expressed his concerns regarding the traffic and congestion to the community. Comments received during Public Communication: Zacher Samaan, resident and member of Church, prayed for the well-being for everyone due to the difficult time we are all going through and prayed for commissioners to support this project. He spoke that he is in favor of project. Amber Desire Dandouch, resident and member of Church and expressed she is in favor of project. Troy Hedger, resident, expressed his disappointment on the way notifications where sent out to the neighbors. Stating they did not receive anything about the Zoom meeting tonight. The residents deserve to be better notified. Jennifer Salhad, Sunday School Teacher at the Church, expressed she is in favor of the project. Dial -in calls ** name unintelligible* * (#9846) asked if the project will have a Wilson address. Tabe van der Zwaag answered, staff has determined that Wilson avenue would be the best access point for the project. Brian Sandona would be the best person to answer question related to the construction of Wilson avenue. (#9846) continued, asked will the driveway be south of the roundabouts. Tabe van der Zwaag stated, Rolling Avenue gate will prevent vehicles and pedestrian access and only available to emergency vehicles. (#9846) continued with concern due to possible congestion near roundabout Brian Sandona Sr. Engineer answered, it was studied by applicant and approved by Traffic department and looking at no more than 27 peak hour trips during the week and 80 hours or so on Sunday. With current level, we would not see any adverse effects. Wilson will not be constructed at this time. Zoom participants: Mr. & Mrs. Unger, Logan Berzins, Debbie Bledsoe, Elias Nemeh all objected because of the traffic, safety and parking concerns of this project site. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 3 of 9 Draft 007 Commissioner Oaxaca asked question for Staff regarding Horse Thief Place. It was mentioned by Mr. Unger there is traffic coming in and out of Horse Thief Place. As he is looking at map of the project site, it looks like a community trail but it dead ends at portion of right away and past the north frontage of the project site. Not sure how traffic is going in, other than south of House Thief and into neighborhood, unless off roading up into the wilderness going north. At this point, he is not seeing a gate or some type of structure at end of Horse Thief. Does not look like there is a gate there currently. Not sure how it is related to this project. Tabe van der Zwaag stated, he is looking at Google street viewing and there is a barrier at the end of north side of Horse Thief. Currently, there should be no vehicles coming through street. In the future, there will be once Wilson is pulled through. Debbie Bledsoe, Troy Hedger, Edward Gutierrez all objected because of the Social Hall events concern and overflow of parking on street. Amber Deisie Dandouch, Jennifer Salhab, Wafaa Batech, Anouna John Saif, Tony Salhab, Brandon Harawa, Lucy Nemeh, Stephanie Frank Salhab, Mathew Batech, Elias Nemeh, Michael Tahan, Sandy Diab, Chris Salhab all are in favor of the project. George Botros, Architect, responded to some of the residents' concerns: Parking — Family two or three people go in one car. Number of people by 3 will give you the number of parking. Not everyone goes single, they go as family together. School — It's a Sunday school and only happens on Sunday, children go with parents. Social Hall Events — limited only for church members only. Events happen only once or twice a month. Walls with sound barriers. Neighbors will not hear anything. South Gate — will be used for fire exit only. No access at all from this gate. Chairman Guglielmo closed the public hearing. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained general background on the city's land use control when it comes to religious organization/denominations. There is a scheduled law known as Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. What that does it says when the city makes an individualized assessment on a religious land use that is going to be operated by a religious organization and CUP qualifies for that, then the city is subject to three limitations. First, it cannot impose a land use regulation that would impose a substantial burden on the organizations exercise of its religion unless the city has a compelling government interest and that condition is least restricted means of addressing the city's concern. Second, the city cannot treat a religious institution on a less than equal term than a non -religious institution. If were to adopt a condition applicable to a church hall that holds 200 people, we want to make sure we are not discriminating against them and other halls that hold roughly same number of people are not subject to a different set of conditions. Third, city cannot adopt land use regulations that discriminate against a religious organization in any way. That is the background sort of the framework on what you will make your decision. You still need to make all the findings for CUP and Design Review as you would for any other project. Keep in mind, we cannot impose substantial burdens on the exercise of the churches practice and we cannot discriminate in any way. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 4of9 Draft 008 Commissioner Dopp, asked would it be fair to say placing restrictive hours on operation would be a violation on the free exercise clause under that provision. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney responded he is not prepared to conclude one way or the other. These cases are very fact sensitive. It's difficult to decide in advance how a court might come out on whether a condition is acceptable or not. His suggestion would be if the majority of the commission is interested in exploring a condition that would limit the hours of operation for the assembly room for social gatherings, weddings, etc. His recommendation would be to continue this item so he can work with staff to provide the commission a better answer to that question. Not prepared to provide an opinion tonight. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked if Staff has any precedent, they would be able to provide because one of the consistent concerns raised by residents is there being no restriction on the hours of the Social events. Looking at the Staff Report Exhibit C, which provides more detail about what the Church anticipates the uses of the both the Church building Social hall will be and when those will take place and it does specify certain hours. Is there any practice that we can point to that might give us an example of how churches are managing the situation in other parts of the city. Director McIntosh answered, that would be one of the things we would do is we could inventory the other use permits that we approved and in cases where some of the churches have pre -dated a requirement for a use permit, we could look to see what kind of precedent we set. Vice Chair Oaxaca mentioned there was a concern raised about alcohol consumption and he does not know if any of our existing regulations around events in the City, an event at a social hall at a church would not involve pulling a City permit but would that be the case here if there would not be a City review or permit required for any events held on the church property at the social hall. Director McIntosh answered for individual events for institutional use, they could get one day ABC special event license. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked would that be required where they would have alcohol served. Director McIntosh answered it is a requirement of the State. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked, the square footage of the Social hall would probably have a maximum capacity. Do we have that information of how many people can occupy that space for a particular event. Tabe van der Zwaag, answered currently it does not list it in the plans. Although, the Church capacity is 416. The Social hall is a little bit larger because it also has some offices, storage areas and a kitchen. That is why square footage is larger than the Church. If it does get continued, we can address that issue regarding social hall capacity. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked will street parking be allowed on the frontage on East Avenue when the project is completed. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 5of9 Draft 009 Tabe van der Zwaag answered does not have the answer. If it does get continued, will address it at that time. Commissioner Williams stated she agrees with doing an inventory on CUP's on some of the churches previously approved to see what we have done to give us direction on which way to go. Regarding street parking, it does happen occasionally with grand opening and such. In this case, they do have enough parking. As for alcohol, we should check with other churches to see what we have done. It will give us some solid information. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, shared information regarding parking on public streets and mentioned the City Council last year adopted an ordinance to streamline the process for creating preferential parking districts. Now the City Council by resolution can create preferential parking districts and it was done because of overflow parking from apartment buildings into neighboring singly family communities. The threshold is 75% of the residents for proposed districts. The City Council does have the discretion to create a preferential parking district that will restrict others from parking at certain hours or certain days of the week. Commissioner Morales stated he did get a chance to visit the site. He noticed it is a higher elevation lot and eventually it will be developed either as residential or the church. Views are going to change for the neighborhood below it once it's developed one way or the other. He did notice on the site plan of the project the two buildings, church and social hall, are separated by a courtyard that is at the north end of Rolling Pasture Place, and believes a nice rod iron gate will allow a view from the street looking north and the buildings will not be blocking from the street. Also, in the packet the applicant said there would be 200 people attending the Church, not 200 families. He heard one resident concerned there would be 200 families and they would not find any parking spaces. There will be extra parking spaces left over. Lastly, regarding the ABC alcohol permit application process, when applicant wants to have an event where they will have alcohol or sell alcohol the application requires them to list the hours of the event they will have. Maybe get City approval, different steps, including the Police department so that is where the opportunity to control it. Commissioner Dopp, stated there seems to be some consensus to hold off on a vote for two weeks because of some more research that needs to be done. He thanks both residents and various church members for coming out, it's important to hear each perspective. He is starting to question how restricted a permit can and should be on a religious institution. It starts to run into a situation where basically we are asking the church to anticipate their attendance on a weekly basis. We would not ask most businesses to outline a schedule on a year-to-year basis. He does have concerns about diving so deep into a conditional use permit and forcing religious institutions to outline their service specifically, how their services are going to impact residents. Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer, clarified information regarding parking on East. They do have a condition to require sign and stripping as required and it gets approved by City Engineering at time of plan check and permits. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 6of9 Draft ffm Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner mentioned looking at google street view, it looks like there is no parking North of Philly Court and restricted parking at South of Philly Court based on school days. Commissioner Dopp mentioned there is a park on the other side of the street as well. It is open parking. There is still parking available by that park. We could also see a situation the church contract with Summit School as an option to take away overflow parking at the church on a Sunday. Those are just other options in that neighborhood. Chairman Guglielmo thanked all the participants. This way of technology and making a meeting effective and bringing to our attention a lot of the concerns of the community in a format that has never been used before. None of these comments get overlooked. It sounds like it's a complicated one that needs to be looked at further. Maybe Engineering can look into traffic control measures to limit the speed gain. Recommend bringing this project back. Comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Dopp, stated he would not be opposed to pushing it out a few weeks. Vice Chairman Oaxaca agreed, it's an opportunity to create transparency for the residents in the area and also to give the supporters of the church project a chance to provide transparency about how they might address some of these concerns. He's not opposed to this project, but it would be helpful to fill in some of these blanks. Commissioner Williams mentioned regarding the notice to the neighborhood, we did have a neighborhood meeting in January or February. She feels comfortable the city made every effort to notify residents there was a project of a church coming in. Although, it will need to be decided by next meeting and make sure the public know how the they can participate if it is going to be another teleconference meeting. She is supportive of the church. It will be a very nice addition to the neighborhood. Although, we need more clarity on some of the questions that were asked. Director McIntosh discussed the preferred date of continuance. We will have to go to the second meeting in May. We would have to turn the packet around quickly to meet the next meeting date. She recommends continuing the item to go to May 27th. She explained how the mailing notice went out. The notice still had the location of City Hall. We did receive inquiries from people who asked and when we posted the official agenda, it had the Zoom language on it as well. We did have a couple of people that came to the City Hall today to respond to the notice and we let them know how they could join the meeting via Zoom app or dial -in. We feel that anybody that was interested in participating did find a way to this meeting and that was adequate. Based on Commissioner Williams comment about that neighborhood meeting, if we continue this item if you decide to do, we can go back and find that list of people that attended that meeting and do a separate notification to them and let them know that this will be heard again. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney stated the public hearing had been closed but if planning to allow additional round of comments , item will be continued and are planning to allow additional round of public comments, you will need to open public hearing to the second meeting in May. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 7 of 9 Draft 91 Chairman Guglielmo asked staff for more clarity at the next meeting, if it will be continued, regarding landscaping on the greenbelt North side of project. What will be done there. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca; Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, to reopen the public hearing and continue Item D1 to May 271n 2020, HPC/PC meeting. Chairman Guglielmo announced a five-minute recess @ 9:30 PM. Chairman Guglielmo re -opened the meeting @ 9:35 PM. D2. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 — SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). No public comments. Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams to approve Item D2. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, staff recommendation to approve Time Extension DRC2020-00120. D3. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to allow for the first one (1) year time extension of a previously approved three (3) lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM19557) on 0.98 acre acres of land within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street —APN: 0201-251-56. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). No public comments. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Williams to approve Item D3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, staff recommendation to approve Time Extension DRC2020-00095. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 8 of 9 Draft 012 E. Commission Business DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS: Director McIntosh asked the Commissioners how they felt the meeting went. All agreed it went well, considering the amount of attendees/comments received. It was handled professionally and congratulated Staff for doing a great job! COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. F. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:45pm. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April 16, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 9of9 Draft STAFF REPORT DATE: May 27, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review related to the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225- 123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review DRC2017-00193 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. Background: The proposed church and social building were reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 22, 2020 (Exhibit C). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Planning Commission meeting took place by video conference. Staff presented the project and the Planning Commission received public comment from the applicant's representatives and the general public. The issues raised were related to errors with the public noticing, traffic at a nearby street intersection, on -street parking, access to the project site, the number of special events conducted by the church, and noise. The Planning Commission requested clarification related to the proposed gate on Rolling Pasture Place, the capacity of the proposed social hall, types of restrictions placed on other churches, and the existing speed limit and parking restrictions on East Avenue. To provide staff with time to address these issues, the Planning Commission continued the meeting to May 27, 2020. ANALYSIS: The purpose of a Conditional Use Permit is to allow the City to analyze specific project and their associated uses, and determine if there are any potential operational impacts. If there are any 014 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 2 impacts, then the City will apply specific conditions of approval to the project. It is an opportunity to place limitations on a use when it can be demonstrated that the use might negatively impact adjacent property owners in a manner such as those raised by the neighborhood as noted above. The City, though, has historically placed limited restrictions on the daily operation of churches, and only when it has been demonstrated that the use violates the performance standards outlined in the Development Code and other remedies cannot be found. The proposed conditions of approval currently state that the proposed church will be required to comply with each of the performance standards outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66, including those pertaining to noise. An existing condition of approval also provides the Planning Director with the ability to add additional conditions when it has been demonstrated that the use violates the performance standards. The proposed church will need to comply with the same noise limitations as a single-family residence, which are limited to 60 decibels from 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Representatives for the church has agreed to limit the number of special events to 3 times per month and to end such events by 11:30 p.m. The conditions of approval have been updated to include these limitations. The Planning Commission may also include additional conditions of approval at this time if they believe they are warranted. Staff has reviewed the questions raised by residents at the Planning Commission meeting April 22, 2020, and has addressed each separately as described below: Public Noticing: The original public notice for the April 22, 2020, Planning Commission meeting was sent out prior to the Planning Commission determining that the upcoming meeting would take place by video conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. It was not noted in the notices that were mailed that the meeting would be conducted via video conference. As the public hearing was Continued, the notices that were sent out on May 19, 2020, to inform property owners within 660 feet of the project site of the Planning Commission public hearing on May 27 included this video conferencing information. 2. Traffic: Neighboring residents stated concern about traffic at the intersection of East Avenue and Philly Drive. The City's Engineering Department determined that East Avenue has adequate capacity to accommodate the proposed project. East Avenue traffic levels are low on both Sundays and in the evenings when the majority of the proposed activities will take place. Based on the current traffic levels, the Engineering Department concluded that a signalized intersection is unwarranted at the noted intersection. 3. Social Hall Use and Hours: Neighboring residents expressed concern about the proposed church's operations and whether there would be non -church members engaged in activities at the location. In response, the church provided a letter dated May 11, 2020, stating that events in the social building will be for the exclusive use by church members and will not be available to be rented out by non -church members. These events will take place no more than 3 times per month and will be held on Saturday and Sundays. The events will end by 11:30 p.m., with all guests off of the church grounds by approximately 12:00 a.m. The events will take place entirely within the social building and will be monitored by church members to prevent any disturbances in the parking lot. Valet parking will be provided for larger events to prevent on -street parking. 4. Rolling Pasture Place Gating: The Planning Commission requested details regarding the gate design at the north terminus of Rolling Pasture Place. In response, the applicant 015 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 3 provided the preliminary design for a 6-foot-high gate and pilasters (Exhibit B), which will limit access to Rolling Pasture Place to only emergency vehicles. 5. Capacity of the Social Hall: The Planning Commission asked about the capacity of social building. Per the Building Code, the maximum capacity of the social building is 560 persons based on events with loose tables. Staff, however, does not anticipate that many persons on -site due to the nature of the church's operations. 6. East Avenue Speed Limit and Parking: Neighboring residents inquired about the traffic speed and asked about whether parking is allowed on East Avenue. Per the City's Engineering Department, they determined that the speed limit on East Avenue is 45 miles per hour but is not posted. On -street parking on East Avenue is currently not permitted north of Philly Drive. Parking is also is not permitted at any time on the east side of East Avenue, north of Hunt Club Drive, and not permitted on the west side of East Avenue south of Philly Drive from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. on school days. 7. Conditional Use Permit Survey: The Planning Commission asked staff about prior approvals for other churches and similar assembly uses, and what type of conditions of approval were applied to them. Staff has surveyed the Conditional Use Permits for 6 churches approved between 1989 and 2019 and found only one church (Christ Church of the Valley) in which limitations were placed on the permitted times of special events. This approval was for the expansion of an existing church that holds a large number of outdoor special events throughout the year. The Conditional Use Permits for the other churches either did not include any limitations or only placed broad limitations on when church services and related programming took place (i.e. Sunday school, bible study, group meetings). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was re -advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Staff has not received comments related to the most recent notification of the public hearing for the project; however, staff did receive comments in response to the notices for the April 22, 2020 public hearing. Those comments and the responses to them are discussed in this report. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Applicant Letter Dated May 11, 2020 Exhibit B - Gate Design Exhibit C - Staff Report dated April 22, 2020 with Exhibits Exhibit D - Minutes (Draft) April 22, 2020 Planning Commission meeting Draft Resolution 20-26 of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00193 Draft Resolution 20-27 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 016 GB Architects 400 N. Mountain Ave. #208 Upland, CA 91786 (909)-949-6999 May 1lth, 2020 Dear Mr. Tabe, St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church 5734 East Ave Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Fayek Salhab- (909)-561-3934 We would like to thank you for your patience and support on this project. As a church we understand that the neighbors concerns come from the social hall, to us the social hall and church coincide with each other. One can not exist without the other. it is part of our belief and faith to attend mass in a fasted state and gather after mass to break our fast and have our first meal together as a church. Going back to the neighbors concerns about the social halls hours and number of uses here is what we believe would satisfy all parties. 1. This facility (social hall) to be run as a church for members only not as a business. as mentioned before it will not be rented to non members or other congregations. 2. all events (weddings, baptisms etc.) usually begin around 7pm and end around 11:30pm giving an extra half hour for guests to leave and clean up of social hall, leaving the hall open until about midnight. 3. the number of events is unpredictable this is gods will, we are willing to assume 3 events a month mainly on Saturdays and occasionally on Sundays weddings and baptisms are only held on those two days (for members only). 4. church will provide security for all events at social hall to prevent any disturbance to our neighbors. 5. church will provide valet parking for all events as to not create any disturbance for our neighbors. we hope that these solutions satisfy all parties if you have any further questions or concerns feel free to contact applicant or church staff. with blessings, St. Elias Church Exhibit A 017 � W �d U 0 4 U Z -1 0 vi = U oN z U (!1 a W o Z o 0 w " o 0 0 C/") O Q cv m LLJ Q Z 00 Of � N W W N W I Z O 0 0n Z � W 0 0) p N LLJ ® 0 � x LLJ Z Q Z z 00 Q Z U CL w Y�9 0 0 Z I \ H Z Z Z W Ld ¢ o 2 a' U m 0 z a V) o W z o � z CD z U (/) O J O w co O I W III JO N M m Q ¢ III m o m IN wU N J w � ¢ �¢ Xcn m IN� ~ _ L�j Of \ C) I ------------- ------ W ""' N " N N IIII I IIII ° c F— Ld I ° 0 J I � o ° U I N 0 --------------------- „Z N r� w z O z � O CD U H[JL O = U _ PF1_ o I nOn�nOn W Q C� o I C- C� W II U w N U W c }. Lw uouLJuouo 0 0CD 0 Tf H11 018 STAFF REPORT DATE: April 22, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh. AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017- 00194 — GEORGE BOTROS, APPLICANT — A request for site plan and architectural review related to the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225- 123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Design Review DRC2017-00193 and Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square feet) project site is located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south. The site generally drains from north to south. The street improvements along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Exhibit C 019 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low _ Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan Very Low (VL) Residential District Single -Family Low Very y Residences _ Neighborhood Etiwanda-Specific Plan Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District East Vacant Land Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan Very Low (VL) Residential District West Single -Family Very Low Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue. Access to the project will be from a single driveway off East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place. A drive aisle wifl be located around the perimeter of the two buildings, with parking stalls located along both the north, south and west elevations of the two buildings as well as the project perimeter. The applicant will be responsible for constructing East Avenue street improvements which include street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting The applicant will also be responsible for paying in -lieu fees to construct one-half of the future Wilson Avenue street improvements along the project frontage. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue Community Entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue (Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents; and "S" clay tile roof. The church will have a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the maximum height permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The social building is designed to carry over the design theme of the church, but with a less formal appearance and will have a maximum height of 32-feet and 6-inches. The ground level floorplan for the church (9,400 square feet) will include the main sanctuary, classrooms for Sunday school, bathroom facilities, a meeting room, an office for the priest and a cry room. The second story of the church (2,950 square feet) will include additional Sunday school classrooms. The ground -level floor plan for the social building (14,653 square feet) will include a large open floor plan for gathering and meals along with kitchen facilities, a smaller open gathering area, and bathroom facilities. The second story of the social building (3,380 square feet) will include offices, dressing rooms. storage areas. and bathroom facilities. �X11 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22. 2020 Page 3 The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Building Setback East Avenue Required Provided 35 Feet 78 Feet 20 Feet 61 Feet Compliant? Yes Building Setback North Property Line Yes Building Setback South Property Line 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes Yes Building Setback West property line 20 Feet 139 Feet Parking Setback East Avenue 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes B. Parkinq: Parking for churches is based on the number of fixed seats in the main sanctuary. In this case, there will be 416 fixed seats in the main sanctuary.. which translates into a parking requirement of 139 parking spaces The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement. The applicant has informed staff that the church and social building will not be used concurrently. Land Use Parking Ratio Reguired Parkin Provided Parkin Church (416 Seats) 1 Per 3 Seats in Sanctuary 139 Spaces 167 Spaces C. Conditional Use Permit (DRC2017-00194): Section 17.16.120.A of the Development Code states that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only having an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. The proposed church use is defined in Section 17.32.020.C.1 of the Development Code as an "assembly use" which covers permanent meeting facilities for organizations operating on a membership basis including religious organizations. Per the land use table of the Ftiwanda Specific Plan, churches are permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Saint Elias Church will hold services on Sundays between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., followed by a social gathering/meal in the adjacent social hall. The applicant estimates that attendance for church services, based on their current church attendance in the city of Upland, will be approximately 150 persons along with 75 children, with increased attendance for religious holidays and other special events. The church operation will also include monthly family nights, youth meetings and senior citizen gatherings. Additionally, church members may use the church and social building for weddings, funerals and other related events. These special events currently occur no more than once monthly 021 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE SOTROS April 22. 2020 Page 4 The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code. General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. Fact: The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Very Low and a zoning designation of Very Low (VL) Residential District. Churches are permitted in the Very Low (VL) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the project complies with the City's building height. setback, parking. landscape, and architectural standards. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is located in an area dominated by residential land uses. The project site will provide vehicle access from a public street and public utilities are located on or adjacent to the project site. The attached standard conditions include conditions of approval related to parking, noise and light glare to reduce potential impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health. safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Environmental studies were prepared by the applicant's consultants reviewing the projects potential impact on the environment related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, noise, and traffic. The reports determined that the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. D. Trails Advisory Committee: The project was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 11, 2020, The Committee approved the proposed Wilson Avenue Community Trail alignment. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Guglielmo, Williams, and Smith) on March 17, 2020). The Committee recommended that the project move forward as presented to the Planning Commission for final review and approval. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant hosted a neighborhood meeting on January 14, 2020. Approximately 18 persons attended the meeting and raised concerns related to traffic, parking and potential noise issues. The church representatives responded that the church currently meets in the city of Upland and has fewer than 200 regular attendees. The proposed site plan includes 167 parking spaces, adequate parking for more than 400 persons. They stated that there would be one service on Sunday mornings and only small group meetings during the week. The church wilt be the sole user of the social building, which will only be 022 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 5 used on Sundays for meals after the church service and for special events such as weddings and funerals (for church members only). The church and social building will be constructed to the current building standards, which will reduce the outdoor noise levels to below City standards. There will be no vehicle or pedestrian access (beyond emergency vehicles) to the church from the adjacent cul-de-sac (Rolling Pastures Drive), eliminating potential spillover parking. Staff informed the residents that the proposed church use requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit, which can be modified to include new or updated conditions of approval if issues related to the operation of the church use should arise in the future. With the outstanding issues addressed, the residents were supportive of the proposed project. G. Public Art: Per Development Code Section 17.124,020 (Public Art Required), places of worship are exempt from the public art requirement. H. Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use and the zoning designation for the project site are Very Low and Very Low (VL) Residential District, respectively, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following five environmental factors are required to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Infill Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact. The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. 023 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 6 c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) were prepared forthe project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance ❑istrict (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality- A water quality control exhibit (Plumb Engineering) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Assessment Report (Advantage Environmental Consultants) was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading, The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. CALIFORNIA STATE BILL 166 AND 330: The project conforms to the requirements outlined in Senate Bill 166 (SB166) as the development of the project site with a non-residential land use is not necessary for the City to meet the housing numbers obligation under the current RHNA cycle. While the project has been identified in Housing Element's inventory, the City has identified land along Foothill Boulevard and Haven Avenue as potential housing sites to meet the City's RHNA housing requirement. As part of the City's update to the General Plan that is currently underway, additional locations for residential development elsewhere will be evaluated. The project also conforms to requirements outlined in Senate Bill 330 (SB 330), which places limitations on general plan or specific plan amendments reducing the intensity of land use within an existing zoning district. The proposed church use is conditionally permitted under the City's current zoning regulations and does not necessitate changing or modifying the existing General Plan land use designation or zoning ordinances. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site is currently assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following; transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, and police services. 024 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DR DRC2017-00193 and CUP DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS April 22, 2020 Page 7 COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: While no specific City Council goals are addressed, General Plan Policy LU-2.4 encourages complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re -use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The project is for a new church facility on an infill parcel of land The proposed changes will improve the compatibility of the church with the surrounding residential neighborhood by reducing potential noise impacts through the construction of a new auditorium that is designed specifically for the proposed use. The new auditorium will be located near the center of the project site, increasing the physical separation from the adjacent residential land uses. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no comments been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit B - Colored Elevations Exhibit C - Operations Letter Exhibit D - Trails Advisory Committee Comments (March 11, 2020) and Action Agenda — DRAFT Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Comments (March 17, 2020) and Action Agenda — DRAFT Draft Resolution of Approval for Design Review DRC2017-00193 Draft Resolution of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 025 m *1 WILSON AV, SIT ELIAS CHURCH CHURCH BUILDING sFcoNo F�ow ,zao � SOCIAL BUILDING -ST FLDDR WD2 SF SFCPNO RDOa 3]ec Q TDP3] 4 FIxED SEATING NUMBERS =41fi PARKING REGUIRC 139 167 PARKING SPACES PFOMDED LOT AREA 141900 Sr TOTAL FIRST FLOOR AREA - 24D53 SF TOTAL PORGM AREA 1634 SF COVERED AREA 25sa7 SF 19.1% LANDSCAPING AREA 27000 SF 15% N a [l SHLM INDEX IAInDrR S[T[ P N7€2ANCE 4 lnl FLTxIR PLAN •-2 CIAR H SECOND ✓'L9 PI.. AND DOT K- f-] CHURCH EIEVAT11M3 A -A CINNCH SECTIONS 4-5 $OCTAL DUILDIn4 1-7 — PLAN -6 EDCIAL AIILDINC SECOND FLIW PLAN AND RDpf PLAN -T SOCIAL DNILlI ELE1171— A-E S.ZIL DV"M SEC INNS L-1 PRe41nINARr LPM."K PLAN n I- L P= SITE PLPN E6KFPNw. —I. PLAN T- ODT AND ILL EXHIBITI- A- SECTD x 3- S1M 011-12-01N'PP E PREL[MT— 'W Sl if 4ND DPAINPGE PLAN gYfola Kun Af IDR nA BUILDING CODE INFORMATION CURRENT COOS: 2019 EALIENOW, SU.OING CODE 2019 EALFORlA MECWNIGA. COOL 2Di9 LYMOREDA EL[CTRICAL CODE 2019 CAIIFORN-A KUNDINO CODE X09 CAUFURNIA LNERCY CDR 2019 CALIFORNIA rIRE LOOS xSTRIY'TnN TYPE Y-A 'raCOMPETIO rIfli SPRINKLED AND FIRE ALARM OCCUPANCY GROUP A-3 OCCUPANNT LOAD 41E PERSONS 'U"kc VIF BE GDNs11DNG10 MTN E1il VM PNASH MATERAES . 7 DMYS C0 0 R5. Ax0 DRC2017-00194 YENOUTroe OPENINGS PER COC DwPTER TA SITE PLAY owNEN: GB 5734 EPSI Av sT � I� - GB ARCHITECTS ACXISECTNNF PuxMiNc EnOIxEEDIND PAWECIr SCALE 01 026 e e e nrx f- W-." V-r for Wr d4 wx Vr �1-1 VOL ---------- ---------- -To ---------- FF 1pf F R I F -ILHIRM-POPS over nm� ----------------- -- -------- ll DRC2017-00194 CHURCH FIRST FLOOR PLAN CHURCH OH OwN-ER: SCALFIRST PLAN GD ARCHITECTS 027 CHURCH SECOND FLOOR PLAN SCALE ,n•.ra• OWNER:"�0"°O'S wqff A-2 028 CHURCH REAR ELEVATION (WEST) va =l•-a .r.. IytrP.i.r.•x..rM r4argai:rxur r.i4Mra,xrarlryaia,arl:.a I.rRMI MdG.. . Mr.ddlT.rp.rlld:l�p.I.rM.l.lx IalaFlrFFllMI Lill ---------- �-�--a -11•______ ��.iiiiiiliiira�i�iMi�iMi�ii MY4�l4MYdWMr��=. ryk.ra ___ __ ___ ygy4i�i;+;i,`aiMr.rMar.4.ra �._• - ��� __ _ FlrFarlrFa•lrar.rF.rl•lrarlr !ba SIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) DRC2017-00194 029 i FIAT RDOF /AC ........... . 1111111111111111111111 ..... e ALTER PORCH a IoOby © ® a ® ri IoLby T CHURCH SECTION A -A SCALE W-1'-P CHURCH SECTION B-B SCALE Ve"-,'4 CHURCH ALTER SECTION D-D SCALE ,�"•,'-a' CHURCH SECTION C-C SCALE DRC2017-00194 WHURCH SECTIONSOWNERB ARCHITECTS 030 ©RC2017-00194 SOCIAL BUILDING FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE Ve"T 031 032 Aw wswnuv Imo aAaar � NA5 X DWft1 1 uYERS OF GVZINL Zell Y 1N SECTION A -A yyyaloyllyllyyal Plyy `W�I._II :i I�i.,YI.IYI.IYI I.I�II,eIII.,N.IIIIAIM,I.I,I.I�IM,IMM4llll.11l.l.11� �I�!�� �I,li.............. q, �WWI�MIIMMIIIMI y!fMlyyy I!I!,�dllllllly.I�IItAI�IMMy�IM�l�l�,b�l�,f!�I�I�I:r., IIJJJN ----------------- L xLL [BW,In YqE SOCIAL BUILDING HEAR ELEVATION ❑ syo,w sym o 0 SIDE ELEVATION (SOUTH) ELEVATION , (NORTH SIM.) IMlIll�lylllWllll4lllFllllllMlllVn .l.a.l., MM.WMYWYWMY !l.l.lra:i wZ DRC2017-00194 033 L - ---------------------------- xA'RIIG JREA PxTING .axa URIC AM ---------------- ----- kxcxFIwt 4 x § SOCIAL BUILDING SECTION B—B SCALE W-rq SOCIAL BUILDING SECTION A —A SCALE-/I'-1'4' f`` __-___/ ' I I I h , r . 1 , E---- I ILLY aaae --------------- SOCIAL BUILDING ROOF PLAN SCALE .pe'.I'-0 91bW IIY! nln rmul L --- I J - _J I r~ f ILLT soar I I ; I I I i l 1 I I I I 1 r 1 I I r ` I I I L____- CHURCH ROOF PLAN SCALE SECTION xCAt E DRC2017-00194 034 �' L�. ncnm,r..? LA CONCEPTUAL SITE PLA i 1 ! 11 RANCHO • CALIFORNIA a® �LJfir - ��PgFpAM1 USE k � Y _ Iliu Ty INFO AR(w Wn- - ((artn� stsva: r - 8ruyvya w � wP M�101 y [narw rru anCra n / f - .' s[r�r e - .[: rfns �: / •_•n. � � .. rri��,tlh im/ h.��wNrrrwm� Ah: awr. to�uMru lui. qJ� ��.. � •.,•- __ l .— _ ' M {mHwta WM � l e�f+wiwFsnr �► ��....... r.wt,swear.ar wnowwxsmw h:nva.,v .^. r.,. � __-���` �`•.. -. iuurr •n rr, nr m n v x:orr. , ns :re. �"'� EMfNACfllf: rw a mnurm w rrn ro wia. we . h:,iv FART 9,EOC Cr IWwiO° IWOAf: ]i CY or�i� x«rw.,c. nnxmrn cr+m.:xn �rsau.—. T ... xaa rx 9k aw a mra. ase. m.>F ,urLL �. ifs "Ezcr+u�d �0000 Nrtnv 5-12 �" aev..r ---� � - Sim rm LYn 1. nwawb, aC— r*,:al E4 o r.,a-. .. tr . �s.r uwsmnwns s.wrw w,n n L , E 2 gin. wwuoun.,. ry u EAST AWE" mrPmc- . z: PIG 5-28 � OLSON Av6 CUT & FILL EXHIBIT AP N :0225-112-05-0-00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA rmA'. �- _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ---_-_-_-_-_- - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -_- - - --- - -- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3 - - - - - - - - -- `- - - - _ - -- -- - _ - F _ - _ - - - - - --- - - - _ - _ _ - -- - - - - i f i- --_-_-_- -_- - -- . . . . , - - - - - - . . , . . . . . . . - - - - . . . . - - C . . . . . . _ . . . . . - . _ . - t---- ---- - --- - - - - 7-7- z - - - - - - - - - - -. -- --- -- ----- ---- -+-. -- - _ x rcmlo iae war: er. S yyy ' Y d i SS d Ci o m iL i SECTION 6-6 SECTION C-C SECTIONS PLAN APN :Q225-112-05-0-00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SECTION A -A x�. wtxoamk..� s mncu� SITE UTILIZATION MAP AP N:0225-112-05-0-00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Law (L) Residential tie.' p c1,_AMP r I f _ xyl - '� •w- `""mod -/try Le,: �essdential � �_1 _ Y - ���• � '' �. :mod-r�..�" � '� very taw (VL) Reszde raal s$ k' . a No fi 039 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN APN: 0225-112-05-0-00 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA -- All: V, a IIIIII LIIIIIIIIIE LEGEND [= — my " �� 'l 1�m —1—TIM —M IF 'M --j— Tp— p .9. B w W W W91TV V s'ljfl DPNN MTFM ;TEN w txF TOT4 wl. w 8 a IW 4.0 VQ'IAM dx ALL Pwo ED c- H " WEATO TW,,,7W'e . BAStNs (NTS) �rw KSM Km w rya m■ maN; 1] R §fig®0 O } 5 � � 0 |�{\ ,r|�§ b� }� �! |�!•,l�� � { �vv1i! !!i; I v||||| " \ r . p .. mz; s.ELIAS C UCH e . /� _Aa,m m@I�� LANDSCAPE PLAN \ § 7 % ` ] ^ } \ j �/ , 8 0 El st, Ll ,TIM NP� .. �..< <,? `� � q.� .�jY, � ._q- ,Y a �, � 1 'h • . ,� ��; .. t�?� `: 4 ,�.:: f.��J � ��ryl S .DI alb 03 2 3�3 xt\a-'s Syrian Orthodox Church Of Antioch Archdiocese of the Western United States St. Elias Church To Whom This May Concern, We The Syriac Orthodox church has been operating in various States in the United States for over six years, The Saint Elias Church is part of the Syriac Orthodox Church, whom is a small Christian Community based Church. Our Church followers in Rancho Cucamonga, and the surrounding, area accumulate to approximately around 200 families. We have been located in the area for over 10 years, renting locations but now seek to have Church grounds, and a place of worship of our own. As shown in our design for the 5734 East Ave property, (File Number: DRC2017-00193) that we have a Church Building and Worship Center in our proposal that displays in detail how the the use and functionality will take place in tunes during Church activities and other social events. Building 1: Church Use 1. Church Use will be used for Mass every Sundays and takes place from 12:00 P.M. to 2:00 P.M. 2. Family Nights are held ever last Tuesday of the Month from 6:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. 3. Maundy Thursdays from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. 4. Good Friday from 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M -Sunday school will operate during the same time a Church Services Attendance of the Mass is an average of 150+ Persons and 75+ Children. During the Holidays and other Special Occasions the attendance is more. In times of grief the church will offer its services from 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. Building 2: Worship Center 1. Every Sunday after the Mass a social gathering of fellow followers will take place in the worship center from 2,00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. 2. Family Nights 7:00 P.M. to 9:00 F.M. 3. Youth Meetings will occasionally take glace in the Worship center ( No More Than Twice a Year) 4. Senior Citizens Gatherings will also occasionally be held at Worship Center (No More Than Twice a Year). 5. Baptism/Weddings are special occasions and might take place in there. -All use of the facility will be available for members only. All events will be held inside the building. Our private Facility will be open to the community and all Government agencies who are in need of use upon availability of the center. For any questions please feel free to contact Our Board member in charge of the project Frank Salhab via phone at 909-561-3934 or email at franksalhab@msn.com Sincerely, Fr. John A.skar Saif November xx, 2oig Exhibit C 045 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag March 11, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Site Characteristics and Background: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square foot) project site is located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south and generally drains from north to south. The street improvement along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. As part of the project, the applicant will be required to construct the East Avenue street improvements along with paying in -lieu fees to construct one-half of the Wilson Avenue street improvements. The project will also be required to construct the 12-foot wide Community Trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path along Wilson Avenue on land owned by the Metropolitan Water District, as shown in Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The plans submitted for review include the required 12-foot wide Community Trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike path as required by the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Staff Comments: The site plan and Wilson Avenue street section included with the submitted plans show the alignment of the required 12-foot wide community trail and 8-foot wide sidewalk/bike trail, in conformance with the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The project will be conditioned to provide a 4-inch Exhibit D 046 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS March 11, 2020 Page 2 cover of decomposed granite and PVC fencing per Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1002-B. Mai r Issues: None Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee approve the proposed Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail as presented. 047 MARCH 11, 2020 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. 6:00 P.M. —CALL TO ORDER 6:00 prn Roll Call: Francisco Oaxaca X_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _X_ Tony Morales �X_ Carol Douglass (Equestrian) _X_ Bryan Dopp (Alternate) Mike Smith (Staff Coordinator)_X_ Additional Staff Present. Gianfranco Laurie, Sr. Civil Engineer: 4 S, -;oon, Deputy City Manager, Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Trails Advisory Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individual members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Commission at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by Committee for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 12, 2020. Page 1 of 3 048 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. DISCUSSION ITEMS D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. TAC raised the following questions and concerns: I. Would the project be required to construct half of Wilson Avenue at the time the project is constructed? Staff responded that the project would be required to pay an in -lieu fee of the future construction of Wilson -East Avenue street improvements. 2. Will the Wilson -East Avenue intersection continue to have a roundabout when fully completed? Staff responded that an upgraded roundabout would be included when Wilson Avenue is fully improved. 3. Where the East Avenue. crosswalk will be located? Staff responded that the crosswalk will be located to the south of the entrance to the roundabout. 4. Committee member Tom Tisler stated that from his experience roundabouts are unsafe. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission by all the Committee members (Oaxaca, Morales. Tisler, Douglass, Smith). D2 DISCUSSION OF STEP-THRU BARRIER REPLACEMENTS AT FLOOD CONTROL ENTRANCES (Oral report), D3. DISCUSSION OF PACIFIC ELECTRIC TRAIL DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS (Oral report). Page 2 of 3 049 1112020 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE E. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR THE NEXT MEETING This is the time for the Trails Advisory Committee to identify the items they wish to discuss at the next meeting. These items will not be discussed at this meeting, only identified for the next meeting. G. ADJOURNMENT 091612A I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant 11 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, March 05, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. Page 3 of 3 050 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag March 17, 2020 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest comer of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Site Description: The 3.28-acre (143,041 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The vacant project site is covered in native and non-native grasses and scrubs. The dimensions of the rectangularly shaped project site are approximately 660 feet from east to west and 216 feet from north to south and the site generally drains from north to south. The street improvement along East and Wilson Avenues adjacent to the project site have not been completed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Overview: The applicant proposes developing a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue. Access to the project will be from a single driveway of off East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place. A drive aisle will run along the perimeter of the two buildings, with parking stalls located along the north, south and west elevations of the two buildings. The applicant will be responsible for constructing the East Avenue street improvements along with paying in -lieu fees to construct one-half of the Wilson Avenue street improvements. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue community entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the community trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue (Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) and the landscaping between the north property lie and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. Exhibit E 051 DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00193 — GEORGE BOTROS March 17, 2020 Page 2 The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents, and "S" the roof. The church will have a maximum height of 35 feet, which is the maximum height permitted within the Very Low (VL) Residential District. The social building is designed to carry over the design theme of the church, but with a less formal appearance and will have a maximum height of 32-feet and 6- inches. The ground level floorplan for the church (9,400 square feet) includes the main sanctuary, classrooms for Sunday school, bathroom facilities, a meeting room, an office for the priest and a cry room. The second story of the church (2,950 square feet) includes additional Sunday school classrooms. The ground level floor plan for the social building (14,653 square feet) includes a large open floor plan for gathering and meals along with kitchen facilities, a smaller open gathering area, and bathroom facilities. The second story of the social building (3,380 square feet includes offices, dressing rooms, storage areas, and bathroom facilities. The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback 35 Feet 78 Feet Yes East Avenue Building Setback 20 Feet 61 Feet Yes North Property Line Building Setback South Property Line 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes Building Setback West propertyline 20 Feet 139 Feet Yes Parking Setback East Avenue 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes Parking: Parking for churches is based on the number of fixed seats in the main sanctuary. In this case, there will be 416 fixed seats in the main sanctuary, which translates into a parking requirement of 139 parking spaces. The proposed church proposes 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces in excess of the minimum requirement. Parkin Ratio Required Parkin Provided Parkin Churches (416 Seats 1 Per 3 Seat in Sanctuary 139 Spaces 167 Spaces Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed buildings architecture and site plan layout, which will complement the residential development to the south and west. The buildings are well designed and architectural design elements are applied to each elevation ("360 degree architecture"). The two buildings will be separated by a landscaped courtyard and will be surrounded by generously landscape walkways, landscape planters and a parking lot. The project site is located at the northern terminus of East Avenue and the eastern terminus of Wilson Avenue and will be required to install or pay Engineering Department in -lieu fees to install the street and right-of-way improvements, along with the East Avenue community entry improvements and the East Avenue theme wall. The project complies with all requirements of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Development Code. - DRC COMMENTS DRC2017-00193 -- GEORGE BOTROS March 17, 2020 Page 3 Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. East Avenue fronting walls shall be designed to conform with the East Avenue theme wall as shown in Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 2. Install the East Avenue community entry improvements per Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Install community trail and sidewalk/bike trail per Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1002-B. 4. All ground -mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back -flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 5. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the buildings. & Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 7. Trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission as presented for final review. 053 MARCH 17, DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE A. CALL TO ORDER 7: 00pm Roll Call: Diane Williams _x_ Tony M. Guglielmo _x_ Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate P!o r- B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. Please sign in after speaking. C. CONSENT CALENDAR The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and non -controversial. They will be acted upon by the Committee at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed for discussion. C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes February 18, 2020. Page 1 of 3 054 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINS Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE D. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. Please sign in after speaking. D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193— GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the northwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific; APN: 0225-123-05. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Tabe van der Zwaaq,. Associate Planner, gave a PowerPoint presentation and oral report. Following the report. staff was asked by the Committee about the large landscaped area located immediately to the north of the project site. Staff stated that it was property owned by the Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The landscaping was going to be installed by the applicant to enhance the area. The Committee also asked about the construction of an uncompleted segment of Wilson Avenue located along the north side of MWD's property. Staff stated that the street will not be constructed until the vacant properties on the opposite (north) side of the future street were developed (which is not pending). The applicant will be required as a condition of approval to pay in -lieu fees to cover their share of the construction of the street. The Committee asked if the "social building" that is part of the project is open to the public. Staff and the applicant indicated that it would only be for private events conducted by the church. Page 2 of 3 055 KE■ DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA MINUTES RAINs Room CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE DRC recommended approval to the Planning Commission with no significant issues or concerns raised. �X Recommend approve to PCIPD. ❑ Recommend approve with revisions to PCIPD. ❑ Direct applicant to revise proposal and return to DRC for follow-up review. ❑ Recommend denial to PCIPD. Other E. ADJOURNMENT 7.15pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 12, 2020 at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired Page 3 of 3 056 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES APRIL 22, 2020 A. Call to Order The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on April 22, 2020. The meeting was called to order my Chairman Guglielmo at 7:00pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. Chairman Guglielmo asked Director McIntosh to explain the structure and format of tonight's meeting. Director McIntosh welcomed all to our first Zoom meeting. She took the time to explain how we are integrating our legal requirements and quasi-judicial procedures into this Zoom format. B. Public Communications Zacher Samaan, resident and member of Church, prayed for the well-being for everyone due to the difficult time we are all going through and prayed for commissioners to support this project. He spoke that he is in favor of D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. Amber Desire Dandouch, resident and member of Church and expressed she is in favor of Church project. Spoke regarding Item D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. Troy Hedger, residents, expressed his disappointment on the way notifications where sent out to the neighbors. Stating they did not receive anything about the Zoom meeting tonight. The residents deserve to be better notified. Jennifer Salhad, Sunday School Teacher at the Church, spoke regarding Item D1 that will be discussed later in the meeting. She will hold her comments until then. Closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of March 11, 2020 One correction noted by Commission Morales on Page 3. Change $30,000 per year household to $30.00. Motion by Commission Dopp, second by Commission Williams; to approve Item C1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, to adopt the amended minutes. Exhibit D 057 D. Public Hearings D1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194 — GEORGE BOTROS — A request for site plan and architectural review along with the operation of a proposed 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building on a 3.28 acre (143,053 square foot) project site located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; APN: 0225-123-05. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — Infill Development. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). Commissioner Morales asked about the access gate and is curious what the design would be because it is at the end of the residential street. Also, to make sure there will be a posted sign on the gate "emergency access only". His questions for staff, later during construction, the design of the gate will go to staff to approve. Tabe van der Zwaag answer yes, and it will also be reviewed by the Fire Department to meet their requirements. Commissioner Williams asked about the fiscal impact for the project, she thought Churches were exempt from property tax. Is that true. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney answered yes that is the law right now. George Botros, Architect, mentioned his goal on this project was to come up with good, attractive design, but very simple roof line. They like to work with surrounding area especially with mountain on one side and residential on other and very sensitive to the neighbors. Regarding the Social building is below any heights of custom house. No need to concern of the noise, he assures there will be no noise but just in case, he stated they will place sound barriers inside the walls. Commissioner Morales asked Mr. Botros, since we received letters from concerning residents of the project next to their neighborhood, during the gate design review, will they keep in mind to prevent people from parking in residential street and then walking into the Church property from the emergency access gate. Mr. Botros answered, nobody will park there. There's plenty of parking on Sunday's. Brian Sandona, Sr. Engineer spoke regarding Condition of Approval #3, would like to modify to allow the in -lieu fee as imposed to construction of the improvements on Wilson. Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing: Troy Penopolis, Civil Engineer for this project. Thanked everyone on this project. Available to answer any questions Commissioners may have on this development. No questions from Commissioners. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 2of9 Draft 058 For the Record, Correspondences received by the following residents: - Wayne & Karen Lee, residents, expressed their concerns regarding traffic and parking. Requesting to restrict activities to the hours of 0800 to 2100 hours. - Lisa and Jeff Unger, residents, expressed their concerns regarding traffic on East avenue and request a stop light at corner of East avenue and Philly drive. - Kunah Yoon, resident, expressed his concerns regarding the traffic and congestion to the community. Comments received during Public Communication: Zacher Samaan, resident and member of Church, prayed for the well-being for everyone due to the difficult time we are all going through and prayed for commissioners to support this project. He spoke that he is in favor of project. Amber Desire Dandouch, resident and member of Church and expressed she is in favor of project. Troy Hedger, resident, expressed his disappointment on the way notifications where sent out to the neighbors. Stating they did not receive anything about the Zoom meeting tonight. The residents deserve to be better notified. Jennifer Salhad, Sunday School Teacher at the Church, expressed she is in favor of the project. Dial -in calls ** name unintelligible* * (#9846) asked if the project will have a Wilson address. Tabe van der Zwaag answered, staff has determined that Wilson avenue would be the best access point for the project. Brian Sandona would be the best person to answer question related to the construction of Wilson avenue. (#9846) continued, asked will the driveway be south of the roundabouts. Tabe van der Zwaag stated, Rolling Avenue gate will prevent vehicles and pedestrian access and only available to emergency vehicles. (#9846) continued with concern due to possible congestion near roundabout Brian Sandona Sr. Engineer answered, it was studied by applicant and approved by Traffic department and looking at no more than 27 peak hour trips during the week and 80 hours or so on Sunday. With current level, we would not see any adverse effects. Wilson will not be constructed at this time. Zoom participants: Mr. & Mrs. Unger, Logan Berzins, Debbie Bledsoe, Elias Nemeh all objected because of the traffic, safety and parking concerns of this project site. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 3 of 9 Draft 059 Commissioner Oaxaca asked question for Staff regarding Horse Thief Place. It was mentioned by Mr. Unger there is traffic coming in and out of Horse Thief Place. As he is looking at map of the project site, it looks like a community trail but it dead ends at portion of right away and past the north frontage of the project site. Not sure how traffic is going in, other than south of House Thief and into neighborhood, unless off roading up into the wilderness going north. At this point, he is not seeing a gate or some type of structure at end of Horse Thief. Does not look like there is a gate there currently. Not sure how it is related to this project. Tabe van der Zwaag stated, he is looking at Google street viewing and there is a barrier at the end of north side of Horse Thief. Currently, there should be no vehicles coming through street. In the future, there will be once Wilson is pulled through. Debbie Bledsoe, Troy Hedger, Edward Gutierrez all objected because of the Social Hall events concern and overflow of parking on street. Amber Deisie Dandouch, Jennifer Salhab, Wafaa Batech, Anouna John Saif, Tony Salhab, Brandon Harawa, Lucy Nemeh, Stephanie Frank Salhab, Mathew Batech, Elias Nemeh, Michael Tahan, Sandy Diab, Chris Salhab all are in favor of the project. George Botros, Architect, responded to some of the residents' concerns: Parking — Family two or three people go in one car. Number of people by 3 will give you the number of parking. Not everyone goes single, they go as family together. School — It's a Sunday school and only happens on Sunday, children go with parents. Social Hall Events — limited only for church members only. Events happen only once or twice a month. Walls with sound barriers. Neighbors will not hear anything. South Gate — will be used for fire exit only. No access at all from this gate. Chairman Guglielmo closed the public hearing. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained general background on the city's land use control when it comes to religious organization/denominations. There is a scheduled law known as Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. What that does it says when the city makes an individualized assessment on a religious land use that is going to be operated by a religious organization and CUP qualifies for that, then the city is subject to three limitations. First, it cannot impose a land use regulation that would impose a substantial burden on the organizations exercise of its religion unless the city has a compelling government interest and that condition is least restricted means of addressing the city's concern. Second, the city cannot treat a religious institution on a less than equal term than a non -religious institution. If were to adopt a condition applicable to a church hall that holds 200 people, we want to make sure we are not discriminating against them and other halls that hold roughly same number of people are not subject to a different set of conditions. Third, city cannot adopt land use regulations that discriminate against a religious organization in any way. That is the background sort of the framework on what you will make your decision. You still need to make all the findings for CUP and Design Review as you would for any other project. Keep in mind, we cannot impose substantial burdens on the exercise of the churches practice and we cannot discriminate in any way. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 4 of 9 Draft 060 Commissioner Dopp, asked would it be fair to say placing restrictive hours on operation would be a violation on the free exercise clause under that provision. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney responded he is not prepared to conclude one way or the other. These cases are very fact sensitive. It's difficult to decide in advance how a court might come out on whether a condition is acceptable or not. His suggestion would be if the majority of the commission is interested in exploring a condition that would limit the hours of operation for the assembly room for social gatherings, weddings, etc. His recommendation would be to continue this item so he can work with staff to provide the commission a better answer to that question. Not prepared to provide an opinion tonight. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked if Staff has any precedent, they would be able to provide because one of the consistent concerns raised by residents is there being no restriction on the hours of the Social events. Looking at the Staff Report Exhibit C, which provides more detail about what the Church anticipates the uses of the both the Church building Social hall will be and when those will take place and it does specify certain hours. Is there any practice that we can point to that might give us an example of how churches are managing the situation in other parts of the city. Director McIntosh answered, that would be one of the things we would do is we could inventory the other use permits that we approved and in cases where some of the churches have pre -dated a requirement for a use permit, we could look to see what kind of precedent we set. Vice Chair Oaxaca mentioned there was a concern raised about alcohol consumption and he does not know if any of our existing regulations around events in the City, an event at a social hall at a church would not involve pulling a City permit but would that be the case here if there would not be a City review or permit required for any events held on the church property at the social hall. Director McIntosh answered for individual events for institutional use, they could get one day ABC special event license. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked would that be required where they would have alcohol served. Director McIntosh answered it is a requirement of the State. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked, the square footage of the Social hall would probably have a maximum capacity. Do we have that information of how many people can occupy that space for a particular event. Tabe van der Zwaag, answered currently it does not list it in the plans. Although, the Church capacity is 416. The Social hall is a little bit larger because it also has some offices, storage areas and a kitchen. That is why square footage is larger than the Church. If it does get continued, we can address that issue regarding social hall capacity. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked will street parking be allowed on the frontage on East Avenue when the project is completed. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 5 of 9 Draft 061 Tabe van der Zwaag answered does not have the answer. If it does get continued, will address it at that time. Commissioner Williams stated she agrees with doing an inventory on CUP's on some of the churches previously approved to see what we have done to give us direction on which way to go. Regarding street parking, it does happen occasionally with grand opening and such. In this case, they do have enough parking. As for alcohol, we should check with other churches to see what we have done. It will give us some solid information. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, shared information regarding parking on public streets and mentioned the City Council last year adopted an ordinance to streamline the process for creating preferential parking districts. Now the City Council by resolution can create preferential parking districts and it was done because of overflow parking from apartment buildings into neighboring singly family communities. The threshold is 75% of the residents for proposed districts. The City Council does have the discretion to create a preferential parking district that will restrict others from parking at certain hours or certain days of the week. Commissioner Morales stated he did get a chance to visit the site. He noticed it is a higher elevation lot and eventually it will be developed either as residential or the church. Views are going to change for the neighborhood below it once it's developed one way or the other. He did notice on the site plan of the project the two buildings, church and social hall, are separated by a courtyard that is at the north end of Rolling Pasture Place, and believes a nice rod iron gate will allow a view from the street looking north and the buildings will not be blocking from the street. Also, in the packet the applicant said there would be 200 people attending the Church, not 200 families. He heard one resident concerned there would be 200 families and they would not find any parking spaces. There will be extra parking spaces left over. Lastly, regarding the ABC alcohol permit application process, when applicant wants to have an event where they will have alcohol or sell alcohol the application requires them to list the hours of the event they will have. Maybe get City approval, different steps, including the Police department so that is where the opportunity to control it. Commissioner Dopp, stated there seems to be some consensus to hold off on a vote for two weeks because of some more research that needs to be done. He thanks both residents and various church members for coming out, it's important to hear each perspective. He is starting to question how restricted a permit can and should be on a religious institution. It starts to run into a situation where basically we are asking the church to anticipate their attendance on a weekly basis. We would not ask most businesses to outline a schedule on a year-to-year basis. He does have concerns about diving so deep into a conditional use permit and forcing religious institutions to outline their service specifically, how their services are going to impact residents. Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer, clarified information regarding parking on East. They do have a condition to require sign and stripping as required and it gets approved by City Engineering at time of plan check and permits. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 6 of 9 Draft 062 Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner mentioned looking at google street view, it looks like there is no parking North of Philly Court and restricted parking at South of Philly Court based on school days. Commissioner Dopp mentioned there is a park on the other side of the street as well. It is open parking. There is still parking available by that park. We could also see a situation the church contract with Summit School as an option to take away overflow parking at the church on a Sunday. Those are just other options in that neighborhood. Chairman Guglielmo thanked all the participants. This way of technology and making a meeting effective and bringing to our attention a lot of the concerns of the community in a format that has never been used before. None of these comments get overlooked. It sounds like it's a complicated one that needs to be looked at further. Maybe Engineering can look into traffic control measures to limit the speed gain. Recommend bringing this project back. Comments from the Commissioners. Commissioner Dopp, stated he would not be opposed to pushing it out a few weeks. Vice Chairman Oaxaca agreed, it's an opportunity to create transparency for the residents in the area and also to give the supporters of the church project a chance to provide transparency about how they might address some of these concerns. He's not opposed to this project, but it would be helpful to fill in some of these blanks. Commissioner Williams mentioned regarding the notice to the neighborhood, we did have a neighborhood meeting in January or February. She feels comfortable the city made every effort to notify residents there was a project of a church coming in. Although, it will need to be decided by next meeting and make sure the public know how the they can participate if it is going to be another teleconference meeting. She is supportive of the church. It will be a very nice addition to the neighborhood. Although, we need more clarity on some of the questions that were asked. Director McIntosh discussed the preferred date of continuance. We will have to go to the second meeting in May. We would have to turn the packet around quickly to meet the next meeting date. She recommends continuing the item to go to May 27th. She explained how the mailing notice went out. The notice still had the location of City Hall. We did receive inquiries from people who asked and when we posted the official agenda, it had the Zoom language on it as well. We did have a couple of people that came to the City Hall today to respond to the notice and we let them know how they could join the meeting via Zoom app or dial -in. We feel that anybody that was interested in participating did find a way to this meeting and that was adequate. Based on Commissioner Williams comment about that neighborhood meeting, if we continue this item if you decide to do, we can go back and find that list of people that attended that meeting and do a separate notification to them and let them know that this will be heard again. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney stated the public hearing had been closed but if planning to allow additional round of comments , item will be continued and are planning to allow additional round of public comments, you will need to open public hearing to the second meeting in May. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 7 of 9 Draft 063 Chairman Guglielmo asked staff for more clarity at the next meeting, if it will be continued, regarding landscaping on the greenbelt North side of project. What will be done there. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca; Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, to reopen the public hearing and continue Item D1 to May 271n 2020, HPC/PC meeting. Chairman Guglielmo announced a five-minute recess @ 9:30 PM. Chairman Guglielmo re -opened the meeting @ 9:35 PM. D2. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00120 — SUSAN ETCHEBERRIA — A request to allow for a one (1) year time extension of a previously approved 7 lot Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT18210) on 4.89 acres of land in the Very Low (VL) District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District on the south side of Banyan Street between Greenwood Place and Laurel Blossom Place; APN: 0225-171-04. On March 28, 2007, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18210. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to the projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and PowerPoint presentation (copy on file). No public comments. Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams to approve Item D2. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, staff recommendation to approve Time Extension DRC2020-00120. D3. TIME EXTENSION DRC2020-00095 — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — A request to allow for the first one (1) year time extension of a previously approved three (3) lot Tentative Parcel Map (SUBTPM19557) on 0.98 acre acres of land within the Low (L) Residential District located at 9757 Liberty Street —APN: 0201-251-56. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15315 - Minor Land Divisions. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). No public comments. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Williams to approve Item D3. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote, staff recommendation to approve Time Extension DRC2020-00095. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 8 of 9 Draft 064 E. Commission Business DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS: Director McIntosh asked the Commissioners how they felt the meeting went. All agreed it went well, considering the amount of attendees/comments received. It was handled professionally and congratulated Staff for doing a great job! COMMISSION ANNOUNCEMENTS: None. F. Adjournment Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 9:45pm. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, April 16, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes — April 22, 2020 Page 9of9 Draft 065 RESOLUTION NO. 20-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2017-00193, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A PROPOSED 12,350 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND 18,033 SQUARE FOOT SOCIAL BUILDING ON A 3.28 ACRE (143,053 SQUARE FOOT) PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EASTAND WILSON AVENUES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-123-05. A. Recitals. 1. George Botros filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00193, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and continued said meeting to May 20, 2020. 3. On the 27th day of May 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on May 27, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is comprised of a parcel totaling 3.28 acres of land located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 066 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-26 DR DRC2017-00193 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan C. The proposed project includes the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue; and d. Access to the project will be from a single driveway from East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place; and e. The applicant will be responsible for constructing East Avenue street improvements which include street paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting. The applicant will also be responsible for paying in -lieu fees to construct one-half of the future Wilson Avenue street improvements along the project frontage. The proposed wall along East Avenue will be required to match the existing East Avenue theme wall (Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) to the south. The project will also be required to construct the East Avenue Community Entry (Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue (Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan) and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District; and f. The church and social building are designed with a Mediterranean architectural design theme that includes the use of smooth stucco, stone veneer, cast stone accents, and "S" clay tile roof; and g. The project complies with each of the related Etiwanda Specific Plan development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District as shown on the following table: Required Provided Compliant? Building Setback East Avenue 35 Feet 78 Feet Yes Building Setback North Property Line 20 Feet 61 Feet Yes Building Setback South Property Line 10 Feet 46 Feet Yes Building Setback West property line 20 Feet 139 Feet Yes Parking Setback East Avenue 15 Feet 38 Feet Yes Lot Coverage 40 Percent 18 Percent Yes Building Height 35 Feet Maximum 35 Feet Yes 067 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-26 DR DRC2017-00193 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 3 h. The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and The project includes Conditional Use Permit DRC2017-00194 for the operation of the church. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan. The project is for the construction and operation of a church and social building on a 3.28-acre project site within the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The underlying General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits a wide variety of uses including churches. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan which permits churches subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project scope is for the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. A conditional use permit (DRC2017-00194) is included as part of the entitlement review package. C. The proposed use complies with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code. The proposed development complies with all standards outlined in the Development Code, including building and parking setbacks, average landscape depth, lot coverage, parking, landscape coverage, site planning, and architectural requirements. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project applicant as submitted environmental studies related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, traffic, and noise which review the project's potential impacts on the environment. That report determined that with the inclusion of mitigation measures related to noise and nesting birds, the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use designation is Very Low and the zoning designation is Very Low (VL) District, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City 068 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-26 DR DRC2017-00193 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 4 limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact. The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Plumb Engineering) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Assessment Report (Advantage Environmental Consultants) was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading. The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 069 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-26 DR DRC2017-00193 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 5 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27TH day of May 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 070 RESOLUTION NO. 20-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2017-00194, APPROVING A REQUEST FOR THE OPERATION OF A PROPOSED 12,350 SQUARE FOOT CHURCH AND 18,033 SQUARE FOOT SOCIAL BUILDING ON A 3.28 ACRE (143,053 SQUARE FOOT) PROJECT SITE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AND WILSON AVENUES IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-123-05. A. Recitals. 1. George Botros filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2017-00194, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 22nd day of April 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and continued said hearing to May 20, 2020. 3. 1. On the 27th day of May 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced public hearing on May 27, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The project site is comprised of a parcel totaling 3.28 acres of land located at the southwest corner of East and Wilson Avenues; and b. The existing General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: 071 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-27 DR DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan North Vacant Land Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Etiwanda Specific Plan South Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan East Vacant Land Neighborhood Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District Commercial Etiwanda Specific Plan West Single -Family Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District Residences Etiwanda Specific Plan C. The proposed project includes the construction of a 12,350 square foot church and 18,033 square foot social building. The two buildings will face each other and will be separated by a common courtyard. The east (rear) elevation of the church will face East Avenue; and d. The church will hold services on Sundays between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., followed by a social gathering/meal in the adjacent social hall. The applicant estimates that attendance for church services, based on their current church attendance in the city of Upland, will be approximately 150 persons along with 75 children, with increased attendance for religious holidays and other special events. The church operation will also include monthly family nights, youth meetings and senior citizen gatherings. Additionally, church members may use the church and social building for weddings, funerals and other related events. These special events currently occur no more than once monthly; and e. Access to the project will be from a single driveway from East Avenue with a separate emergency access gate at the terminus of Rolling Pasture Place.; and f. The proposed church provides 167 parking spaces, 28 parking spaces over the minimum requirement; and g. The project includes Design Review DRC2017-00193 for the operation of the church. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above - referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The subject property has a General Plan land use designation of Very Low and a zoning designation of Very Low (VL) Residential District. Churches are permitted in the Very Low (VL) Residential District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, the project complies with the City's building height, setback, parking, landscape, and architectural standards. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is located in an area dominated by residential land uses. The project site will provide vehicle access from a public street 072 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-27 DR DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 3 and public utilities are located on or adjacent to the project site. The attached standard conditions include conditions of approval related to parking, noise and light glare to reduce potential impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Environmental studies were prepared by the applicant's consultants reviewing the projects potential impact on the environment related to air quality/greenhouse gasses, biological resources, noise, and traffic. The reports determined that the project would not have a negative impact on the surrounding land uses. 4. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In -Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan land use designation is Very Low and the zoning designation is Very Low (VL) District, which permits the development and operation of a church subject to a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing residential development and City infrastructure. The following are the five environmental factors that need to be analyzed to determine that the project qualifies for the Categorical Exemption: a) Traffic: A Trip Generation Memo (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project which determined that the number of trips generated by the project would not create a significant impact. The proposed church use will create an estimated 27 peak hour trips on weekdays and 86 peak hour trips on Sundays. The project's peak hour trips are on Sundays when there is generally minimal vehicle traffic. The proposed church will not negatively impact the operation of the nearest intersections. b) Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) was prepared for the project. The analysis determined that the project's construction phase could potentially create a significant or adverse impact. The analysis included three mitigations measures to reduce construction noise levels. With the implementation of these measures, the analysis determined that the project would have a less than significant impact. Conditions of approval to implement these mitigation measures have been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. c) Air Quality: Separate Air Quality and a Green House Gas Analysis (Birdseye Planning Group) were prepared for the project. The analysis determined that emissions associated with construction and operation of the project would be below South Coast Air Quality Maintenance District (SCAQMD) thresholds for both Air Quality and Green House Gases. 073 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-27 DR DRC2017-00194 — GEOGE BOTROS May 27, 2020 Page 4 d) Water Quality: A Water Quality Control exhibit (Plumb Engineering) was prepared for the project. It was also determined through the review of the project's preliminary water quality plan that the project would not result in a significant impact related to the water quality of the site or surrounding properties. e) Biological: A Biological Assessment Report (Advantage Environmental Consultants) was prepared for the project site. No critical habitat was recorded on the project site. No drainage features occur on the project site and no USFWS designated critical Habitat is located on the project site. Based on the onsite conditions, the project is not anticipated to result in any impact to federally or State -listed plants or animals listed as endangered or threatened or to any non -listed special -status species. No natural communities will be affected by the project and the project is not within a Habitat Conservation Plan area. The Biological Assessment Report does recommend burrowing owl surveys and a nesting bird survey prior to grading. The requirement to perform these surveys has been added to Conditions of Approval for the project. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the attached standard conditions incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 074 Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to the issuance of any grading plans, the City shall condition approval of subdivisions that are adjacent to any developed/occupied noise sensitive land uses by requiring applications to submit a construction -related noise mitigation plan to the City for review and approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated during construction of the project. 2. Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120-D, as measured at the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section 17.02.120. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours; however, if noise levels exceed the above standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with the City's noise standards or construction halted. 3. The construction -related noise mitigation plan required as part of the previous noise mitigation measure shall specify that haul truck deliveries be subject to the same hours specified for construction equipment (i.e., Monday through Saturday, 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. and not allowed on Sundays and national holidays). Additionally, the plan shall denote any construction traffic haul route where heavy trucks would exceed 100 daily trips (counting those both to and from the construction site). To the extent feasible, the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses or residential dwellings. The construction -related noise mitigation plan shall also incorporate any other restrictions imposed by City staff. 4. Electrical power shall be used to run air compressors and similar power tools. Internal combustion engines should be equipped with a muffler of a type recommended by the manufacturer and in good repair. All diesel equipment should be operated with closed engine doors and should be equipped with factory -recommended mufflers. Construction equipment that continues to generate substantial noise at the project boundaries should be shielded with temporary noise barriers, such as barriers that meet a sound transmission class (STC) rating of 25, sound absorptive panels, or sound blankets on individual pieces of construction equipment. Stationary noise -generating equipment, such as generators and compressors, should be located as far as practically possible from the nearest residential property lines. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 075 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. Provide notification to residential occupants adjacent to the project site at least 24 hours prior to initiation of construction activities that could result in substantial noise levels at outdoor or indoor living areas. This notification should include the anticipated hours and duration of construction and a description of noise reduction measures being implemented at the project site. The notification should include a telephone number for local residents to call to submit complaints associated with construction noise. 6. Walls along East Avenue shall be designed in conformance with East Avenue theme wall per Figure 5-28A of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 7. Construct the East Avenue Community Entry per Figure 5-11 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 8. Construct the Community Trail and sidewalk/bike trail along Wilson Avenue per Figure 5-33 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the landscaping between the north property line and Wilson Avenue, on the land owned by the Metropolitan Water District. 9. The facility including special events shall comply with the performance standards outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66 and the lighting standards outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.58. 10. If the operation of the facility causes adverse effects upon the adjacent businesses or operation, the Conditional Use Permit shall be brought before the Planning Director for consideration and possible termination of use. 11. The facility shall comply with the performance standards for noise and vibrations outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.66 (Performance Standards) and light glare outlined in Development Code Chapter 17.58 (Outdoor Lighting Standards). All activities shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 60 dB during the hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. unless otherwise specified in the in Chapter 17.66. 12. Special events in the social building (ie weddings, parties, etc.) shall be limited to tree times per month and end by 11:30 p.m., with all guests off of the church grounds by approximately 12:00 a.m. The events will take place entirely within the social building and will be monitored by church members to prevent any disturbances in the parking lot. Valet parking will be provided for larger events to prevent on -street parking. 13. Construct 6 foot high gates and pilasters at the terminus of Rolling Pastures Place and provide signage designating that the access is for emergency vehicles only. Standard Conditions of Approval 14. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 076 Page 2 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 16. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 17. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 18. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 19. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on -site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 20. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 21. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 22. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, the Specific Plan, Master Plan and the Community Plan www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 077 Page 3 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 23. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line -of -sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on -site to match the building. 24. All ground -mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 25. A detailed on -site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 26. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split -face double sided block, `slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 27. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. 28. Trash receptacle(s) are required and shall meet City standards. The final design, locations, and the number of trash receptacles shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 29. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 30. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet. 31. All parking spaces shall be 9 feet wide by 17 feet long with a required 1-foot overhang (e.g., over a curb stop). 32. Plans for any security gates shall be submitted for the Planning Director, City Engineer, and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. For residential development, private gated entrances shall provide adequate turn -around space in front of the gate and a separate visitor lane with call box to avoid cars stacking into the public right-of-way. 33. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 34. Textured pedestrian pathways and textured pavement across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings/units/buildings with open spaces/plazas/ recreational uses. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 078 Page 4 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 35. For multi -family residential and non-residential development, property owners are responsible for the continual maintenance of all landscaped areas on -site, as well as contiguous planted areas within the public right-of-way. All landscaped areas shall be kept free from weeds and debris and maintained in healthy and thriving condition, and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing, and trimming. Any damaged, dead, diseased, or decaying plant material shall be replaced within 30 days from the date of damage. 36. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 37. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 38. The final design of the perimeter parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to Planning Director review and approval and coordinated for consistency with any parkway landscaping plan which may be required by the Engineering Services Department. 39. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof -mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 40. Prior to the removal of vegetation or ground -disturbing activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the adult birds have not begun egg -laying or incubation; or (b) the juveniles from the occupied nests are foraging independently and are capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one of the above conditions, then no disturbance shall occur within 300 feet of non -raptor nests, and within 500 feet of raptor nests, during the breeding season to avoid abandonment of the young. If nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. The temporary "no construction" area shall be maintained until the nest has completed its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the area may resume. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 079 Page 5 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 41. Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance with the Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the Planning Department within 24 hours of groundbreaking activity. The survey shall include a habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Traffic comments: 1. East Avenue improvements shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North Specific Plan "Secondary Arterial" standards as follows: a. Provide curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, LED streetlights, street trees, drive approaches, signing & striping. b. Driveway approach shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. c. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. 2. Wilson Avenue improvements shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North Specific Plan "Special Divided Secondary Arterial" standards as follows: a. Construct south half of the street along the project frontage, including curb and gutter, asphalt pavement, sidewalk, LED streetlights, street trees, signing and striping. The north one-half of the road shall be 18' of pavement. Median island breaks will not be allowed on Wilson Avenue between Etiwanda and East Avenues. The developer shall pay a fee for future median landscaping. b. Interim roundabout at intersection with East Avenue to be in accordance with FHWA guidelines and CAMUTCD standards. c. Provide a traffic signing and striping plan. 3. Rolling Pastures Place shall be installed in accordance with Etiwanda North specific Plan "Local" standards as follows: a. Protect, provide, or repair existing curb & gutter, streetlights, sidewalk, drive approach, and signing & striping as required. b. Provide a reduced radius turnaround per City Standard No. 113 at the northerly terminus of Rolling Pastures Place and may be constructed within the existing right of way. c. Driveway approach shall be in accordance with the City Driveway Policy. 4. All improvements including the access ramps shall be in accordance with the latest ADA standards, including but not limited to the southwest corner of East Avenue and Wilson Avenue. 2. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 080 Page 6 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. An in -lieu payment for the future improvement of the south one-half of Wilson Avenue in accordance with City "Modified Major with Median" standards and Figure 5-32 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan including curb, gutter, A.C. pavement, street lights, access ramp, sidewalk, street trees, traffic signs, and striping shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. 4. The street improvement plans shall show driveways at the reduced turn around cul-de-sac (City Std. Plan 113) on Rolling Pastures Place shall be as follows: a) No driveway into the church property b) If reconstruction of the Equestrian Trail driveways is required — City Std. Plan 101 Type R-1. 5. Site is located within Area 10 of the attached Etiwanda/San Sevaine Area Drainage Policy. Developments of less than 5 acres are not required to construct storm drain facilities. However, they are required to show they are protected from flooding and shall pay Master Plan Storm Drain fees. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Dedication shall be made of the following rights -of -way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 44-total feet on East Avenue The General Plan designation for East Avenue is a Secondary Street, and Wilson Avenue is a Modified Major Arterial with a median. 7. Rights -of -way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails (if required within the project limits), public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross -lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of Grading Permit(s). All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 9. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 081 Page 7 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign -Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self -hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 11. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 12. Permits shall be obtained from the following agencies for work within or adjacent to their right of way: Metropolitan Water District 13. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts (LIVID 7, SLD 1, SLD7 and CFD88-1) shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 14. A separate set of landscape and irrigation plans per Engineering Public Works Standards shall be submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. The following landscaped parkways, medians, paseos, easements, trails or other areas shall be annexed into the Landscape Maintenance District:: 15. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 082 Page 8 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name: East Avenue Curb & Gutter: 32-feet west of centerline A.C. Pavement Side -walk Driveway Approach(es) Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail: As required for the street crossing Bike Trail Other Street Name: Wilson Avenue Curb & Gutter: 39-feet south of centerline A.C. Pavement Side -walk : continue sidewalk from the west Drive Appr.: Not permitted on Wilson Avenue Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail: continue trail from the west Median Island Bike Trail Other: For Wilson Avenue, the plans shall be engineered and completed for use as a cost estimate to generate an in -lieu of construction fee to be collected. This in -lieu fee will be used for the future development of Wilson Avenue. The in -lieu fee shall be collected prior to the issuance of building permits. Notes: (a) Median island includes landscaping and irrigation on meter. (b) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. (c) If so marked, sidewalk shall be curvilinear per Standard 114. (d) If so marked, an in -lieu of construction fee shall be provided for this item. 17. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 083 Page 9 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 18. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 084 Page 10 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: East Avenue Botanical Name: Geijera parviflora Common Name: Australian Willow Min. Grow Space: Spacing: 45' o.c. Size: 15 gal. minimum Qty.: to be determined Street Name: Wilson Avenue (See Note 4 below) Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia hybrid 'Biloxi' Common Name: Crape Myrtle Min. Grow Space: Spacing: 35' o.c. Size: 15 gal. minimum Qty.: to be determined Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. 4) For Wilson Avenue, the plans shall be engineered and completed for use as a cost estimate to generate an in -lieu of construction fee to be collected. This in -lieu fee will be used for the future development of Wilson Avenue. The in -lieu fee shall be collected prior to the issuance of building permits. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 20.Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 085 Page 11 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: Wilson Avenue East Avenue 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 25. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The proposed structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CRC NFPA 13 and the Current RCFPD Ordinance. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. Platforms are required to be accessible by a ramp or lift in accordance with the latest edition of the CBC Chapter 11 B. Assembly occupancies with an occupant load greater than 300 are a Risk Category III, and require a seismic importance factor of 1.25 be used in the seismic vertical and lateral calculations. This project is located in the high fire area designated VHFHSZ and must comply to chapter 7A of the CBC. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 086 Page 12 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign (s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on -site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 087 Page 13 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 13. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 14. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 15. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 16. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre -grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre -grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over -excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 17. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (East Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 19. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 20. The proposed On -site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, shall be located near East Avenue to allow a future connection to a public sewer main. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 088 Page 14 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Prior to approval of the project -specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 22. The average high ground water level for the subject property is 102--feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall provide as a project condition of approval a separately permitted On -site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be 10-feet above the average high ground water level (or 92--feet maximum below the ground surface). 23. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on -site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on -site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 24.It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off -site drainage easements prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 25. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. 26. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 27. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) shall approve all plans that impact their easement, including utilities, storm drain, slopes, and street trees and landscaping prior to issuance of a grading permit. A note shall be included on all pertinent plans requiring Metropolitan Water District Operations Maintenance Branch to be notified two working days prior to starting any work in the vicinity of their easement. 28. A permit shall be obtained from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) for any work within or adjacent to their right-of-way, including grading prior to issuance of a grading permit. 29. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written comments from MWD regarding site design restrictions within or adjacent to their easement and provide a copy of said comments to the City Engineer, or his designee, for review. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 089 Page 15 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for a commercial or industrial development, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer for reference a copy of the separate On -site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the Building Official for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of current adopted Local Agency Management Program for On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), which will allow site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 31. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 32. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 33. The Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (PWQMP) has been deemed "Acceptable". Prior to the issuance of a grading permit a final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer or his designee. 34. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 35. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 36. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project -specific Water Quality Management Plan. 37. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 38. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 090 Page 16 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 39. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 40. A final project -specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 41. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 42. The final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 43. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project -specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project -specific water quality management plan. 44. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project -Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 091 Page 17 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 45. Prior to approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project -specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Also, prior to issuance of a grading permit the soils engineer shall prepare a project -specific percolation study meeting the requirements of the current adopted City of Rancho Cucamonga Local Agency Management Program for On -site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS). Note a copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety web page. 46. The subject project, shall accept all existing off -site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off -site storm water drainage flows mix with any on -site storm water drainage flows, then the off -site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on -site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. 47. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As -Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 48. As the use of drywells are proposed for the structural storm water treatment device, to meet the infiltration requirements of the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit, adequate source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration shall be evaluated prior to infiltration and discussed in the final project -specific Water Quality Management Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 092 Page 18 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 49. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project -specific water quality management plan shall specifically address items b. and c. above. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 093 Page 19 of 20 Project #: DRC2017-00193 DRC2017-00194 Project Name: DR /// St. Elias Syriac Orthodox Church Location: 5734 EAST AVE - 022512205-0000 Project Type: Design Review Conditional Use Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 50. The average high ground water level for the subject property is 102-feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall provide as a project condition of approval a separate On -Site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS), i.e. a septic plan, showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be 10-feet above the average high ground water level (or 92-feet maximum below the existing ground surface). NOTE: The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted a Local Agency Management Program for On -Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), which will allow site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 51. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 52. The preliminary planting plan (sheet L-1 of 2 prepared by Phil May, Landscape Architect, dated 10-17-19) is proposing a storm water detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project -specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 5/19/2020 094 Page 20 of 20 MW DATE: May 27, 2020 STAFF REPORT TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer INITITATED BY: Gianfranco Laurie, Senior Civil Engineer SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2020-25 which finds the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Summary Index including the General Plan Reference(s) as attached as Exhibit B is required per Government Code 65401, Exhibit A, to be adopted by the City Council. The Planning Commission is required to find the CIP in conformity with the adopted General Plan. The CIP document includes a General Plan Policies section that evidences the specific policy references found in the General Plan. The CIP is a vital piece of the City's Annual Operating Budget as it dictates major capital expenditures obligated in any given year. The CIP consists of a multi -year plan for citywide infrastructure improvements. Each year, the City budgets for funded projects which will occur during said fiscal year. The list of projects contained in the CIP addresses both the City's long and short-term capital needs. It identifies projects that reflect the desires of the community, as well as projects that serve operational and maintenance needs. ANALYSIS: The CIP Summary Index has been categorized by corresponding Departments and project names are in alphabetical order within each section. Individual project sheets include a short summary, cost, and year funded can be viewed on the City's CIP Viewer online at: https://regis.maps.arcqis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8c4eO9a7fc5e450eb262d95be7l e8b6e FISCAL IMPACT: Projects are funded from a variety of sources including Development Impact Fees, Measure I, Gas Tax, and miscellaneous grants. There are 72 projects totaling just over $32,000,000 to be executed in the upcoming fiscal year. Apart from the 72 projects previously identified, 21 projects just over $30,000,000 are identified as future and unfunded. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The City's Engineering staff works with all Departments within the City to develop and implement an economically feasible CIP that embodies the City's public infrastructure needs. The CIP is the product of joint planning, taken from the City's General Plan, local residents, the business community, the local development community, and external government agencies. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Government Code 65401 Exhibit B - Fiscal Year 2020/2021 Capital Improvement Program Summary Index Draft Resolution 20-25 of Approval for finding the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal year 2020/21 in conformity with the Adopted General Plan. 095 Government Cade 66401. If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, within such time as may be fixed by the legislative body, each county or city officer, department, board, or commission, and each governmental body, commission, or board, including the governing body of any special district or school district, whose jurisdiction lies wholly or partially within the county or city, whose functions include recommending, preparing plans for, or constructing, major public works, shall submit to the official agency, as designated by the respective county board of supervisors or city council, a list of the proposed public works recommended for planning, initiation or construction during the ensuing fiscal year. The official agency receiving the list of proposed public works shall list and classify all such recommendations and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing fiscal year. Such coordinated program shall be submitted to the county or city planning agency for review and report to said official agency as to conformity with the adopted general plan or part thereof. Exhibit A DI N O N O N C 0 a 0 V LLJ V � Q J a U cn a O E W tC d z H C z o LU = LLJ LL O a a rn H d a U a c� z O a U U O 2 U z LL O F- U O O O 000 O O O O O O 00 000 000 O O O O to to N O O O O O O O N O O O O It It M O O O N N O O O O O O O O h O O O O to to tp O O O tZ t0 Cp O O O h O O O M O O O O Ln L O O N O O CO CO O M O Cl) * O O N O O O O N N N N N O Ntp co O V� O N to etOM x- Co O) P 06 N N tp Ln V' v V N N 10 O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O x O O O 4 4 O U') O tT O y L- 4 X 00 � N r I- N N NM N y f� Ll- N X O N — O V x O X N N I- 0) O � co � O O O M M O O O In x x 00 00 c0 O LO CD O O O 00 W c0 O N O O N N 66 O O O O N O LO N N — N X LO O LO LO LO LO LO O LO LO LO 00 LO LO O O LO X LO O O O O O (O (O O co co O O r U) LO U LC) LO M Ln LO Ln LO Lfi LO i LO LO LO X LON O Oo O M O O O O N O O M O ClO (N 7 Cl) Cl) 00 M X Cl) O X O O V O M V � Nt O O V) CD M 0) � O E E M M 't r- M x M "t W N N N f� f� x N to O x X O O C) O N M a)O O C) C) O M C N N O N U O 06 U O a) O O 06 O O O O p O Of O O a N 0 X .0. a) (t5 cu 0 2E 0 X M �' Y cnn Lt) (4 .-f :t � J ...� tt3 C) C (0 M U m U U m U ~ C� �? � = � LL LL LL W W LL LL LL LL LL W LL LL LL W LL LL m U LLl o E o (i ++ E E O LO 5 Q O m U L O_ Q U a_C) 0) U y c U H U _0 C) O O U U +0+ U > U o E Uy .O U +0+ U _ C Y U m r O W cn L �_ O U` C N U) N amLO U m O O U U Q) Y 7 0' N U) _ .� c o N � O CU L v s O U :3 U)Q' LL - m O— N M V Ln M 1- W O O •� N U LLI u v a� t� c LL � d L 4 H LL � C V _ N L6 (V N O a vb Cb N M M M co N CO c0 C Ln d U U U U U LL LL U U U 2 2 U' U U U U U a_ a_ U U U U 0 M 097 N O N O N Q LU J a U Q t� O w d H z LU 2 LU O w a J a H Q U a c� z O a U U O U z LL O H U 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v� oo0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 o O o 0 o O o 0 N co O O O O O O O O N N O O O O LO O O O O N tp (Srl� O N O O O N tO t: Il N tl� O O O O O O N p C) C) co O V� V- N <r m V- O V- O O O O to O N to cl N p V� to N O N et cc P M P O x- M ap E r r Q P 0 0 O O O O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 00 'IT r- �t r- CD m LO 't LO f- M an Cn M 1� N_ N_ N_ O O_ N_ O 1� CO N I� N N N N O 0 O Cl) (fl N CV CO co CD (D 00 Ln O Cl) r--00 W O m CA 0 N Cl) Cl) co 00 CO LO O f� CA O O O CA O Cn O O Cn Cn O O p N N N N N N 7 N N 7 7 N N p O O O O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O O O V M LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO M M M M M M M M V (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (D (.0(0 (0 (fl (fl (.0(.0(.0(.0 (.0 co a LO LO M M U')Ln M M Ln M Ln M m M LO M LO LO 00 Cl) LO M LO M LO Cl) LO Cl) LO Cl) LO M M M M �t O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl) M co co M M M M N Cl) M M M M M M M M M M M 't ti O Lf) LO 't LO I- LO 't 't CA ' CA M f- N N f� N Cl O N O f-- 00 O f-- f-- f-- f-- O cu as o of o a) c _ T Cl) c _T _T � M ofLD M O 2 0d .O-CD co co m`) ui z U O O V U 06 06 C 06 O t71 2 Q' cn O O vOi c O N m O O U ~ a3 0 m m p :p O O_ O Q O O O Q 'V_ m (� Q O O- 'U_ O O- •U X N c a) ,� u a) a) a) c m C w ` (O`6 O c "p fc�6 c m c m H H 7 lL H H _0 U) U) U) E Z ( (D O co O U y 7 A LL LL �. LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Cl) J o O p O N - N N 7 c a m m m c O O o a) a c O m L >_ > > c c > o Q Q N E O U a) m (n C C C N `,m cn O a) E O c .� O (6 c N m d C m -2 H a) .�. > a) Y Ot3 Q c E m j< U O a) E o c c c T w c O c O O c O Z) > O a� O U) a� E >Q co O ' n . L> U>W E aO a) U U) LL m W W co co O J OL O 0 W O �- Y (0 V a)=, W _ cn Ur Cn > > a) Y c a) a) arc) a) a) U -a a _0 Q 3 Y c U) c c c c X c c c c c U) n3 m m a) c a) co m m W W Cl) > m > c > a) �U, as _ O Q CU Q E O U > Q > O Q c > Q > Q c 7 7 7 a_ > a) 415Y w' U)ca O U ca c N -O -O ` -O -O c4 — — — O c cu d to LU a) U (0 O (0 (0 Cn L L L -p E !ET U_ a. rn w Q Q Q c0 ca L) 0 w w w w w LL LL c LL LL 0 _ V LO (O I- 00 (T O N Cl) LO CO N N (A z T d t� C d L d Nd L7 C M V N N V U U U U U U U N N N N c- V N U U U U U U C7 a U 0 of U U m 0 0 0 098 000 000 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 is� o00 000 000 0 0 0 o O O o O o 000 O O O O O O O O O O O O O M O O co O O O O O O O O O O O O O a 0 O O O ll� W O V O O O O O o LO !- c0 O) LO tr CO o LO N !r c0 r c0 C1 V) o V.- CM MNLn elLf) P, c0 W) N N M �N E Q 0 0 O O o 0 o O O O o O o o I? O N 00 00 O Itr— m OO fl- f- 'IT X �t 'IT LO It 00 CD W N N_ O 1- r— N x O N O N_ N N Cl) co CO (.0 N N LO W O O LO x CN � _ � r p CO CO f— f— N N LO M O M x Cl) 0) 0) N O O O O O_ O_ O O O O O x O O O 0) O N N N N N N N 77 p O O O O O O O O O O O x O O O O O a V M LO LO LO M LO LO LO LO LO M x LO LO LO LO M LLI Q LO� °LO � ° o ° ° o � x � � � °� M— M M M �t M M ItT M M M } O O Cfl O O O O O O x x O O O O J M LO M M M co V M co co M x M co co co Ln Q 0000 o't r-0) CD� � 't x 't 't LO 't00 'IT CO f— f— f— N O f— f-- O x O N O N CO U cO N N � x N N M co LL C� G N C C Q-' C c CD O E O O M E Y — — O O 0 :y O Z MH 0) U O� p E m m N cu L,�` CO— m N m co �— H E. 0 .Q x (UO N (UO (UO Q Y Q a Q co cn 'E V).Q W C U H .0 j 2 � � LL m co E m m W U E E E coo o E E a O 0 U U U a y 7 J y LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL a a LL LL Q Cl)LL H d U m Q U U) E > o > Q c cu O d ¢ O U i J O O (6 3 O = f6 U ° o 0) °6 w H V-a > Q 00 O N ca 0 U m o o > o O 0 2 m ;a N > � a n o U E — — o. Q a) Q no 0 m Z !E U)E co > o �' _T Q co p L N L N O L U_ L m N N CO m > O p LL LL 0 U- Z C O E C U �j O O '0 Q (n E E w — .� E o > c m 7 al '� C C (0 (0 > E U C C U g (0 > N Q N N U Q .0 Q O E Cn (0 > c Q O N N Q > E Q> N N C U 1 N 1 w N O V) aco zm o in o a)— a) E oo o 0 0 m =° E m m -_06 m o m L aa)i a3i a3i 0 m o U U a) U cu a S S (� J 0 a of�0 w a U) cn U) Fn cn > O N Cl) LO CO I- W 0) O N p N N N N N N N N N N Cl) M Cl) Z N t� C d L d Nd L7 C N V N U U _ U U L cvj M CO 7 N N N LL LU 099 C7 U U U a = U 0 U U 0 0 0� U E Q [1 N c) O N c0 p M O N O O p N Q V O O O O } a m M J M� N (Qj C) w cn LL Q � tU Y U W Z m N H C N00 ZLU O Q LL O E O O � U a LL LL Q N H d c U a a c� Q o 0 Q = L U U o O Y U a O U = 0 U c c Z Q X LL O o 7 U Co c -r- N o >, ?1, 0 U U 0 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O N O O O M to O N N O O O O O O O Il tl� O t I, th tO O O V' Cl) d' N Cl M M P Ln N N lc C) M C) ON) to N t"1 N f0 Y N 16 N M W C7 C7 C7 [) [) C7 C7 C7 F tp tp 00 tp tp to m to — N N N N N M 4) V I— u N N OM 'IT LO M M M � 'IT CD Z N O E N O N O (D O C)O CD 4) 00 (D •C LOOP) (D(n N 7 N N N N N (n 7 y m O i CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD a O O O O O O (D O (DC)U') O 0Cfl(0(0 U') U') U') U') U') U') U') C)V MM cli Cl NN O OO O m m m m ow a LUNN00 W C\l NN M Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) Cl) U) U) _0 U U U 0 U U C O N N N N> C N N Ll -p O O O .O O O N N m m CD m Z c0 N W N .0., .0., :t=! Q (0 (0 (0 O c m m c U U U U U Q Q U H U U LL LL LL LL LL LL J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 00 0 C U) ip O C:co O W c O C O C6 U LL (n (D _T U) W i i T U U w U U- U- 0- i N M LL v N 6 iL M N U a_ N v� V O U 6 LL I.L LL 0 0 c cu U U ,;I- O J W W cm 0 0 E N c U_ O a E O U U � C O- O O N o N fi Q N i U (6 E c N u Q m � � N 3 a co co N co co N N M 4 4 M Cb Cb LL Cb W LL d IL "i Ch Ch LL LL LL LL 100 a a a a a 0- N O N O N a LU } J a U a t� O w F- Z LU 2 LU O w a J a H d a U a c� Z O a U U O Z LL O U �o 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 0 0 -o 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o hoh o o h N O O O O Lry O O h O O O h O ab O h tl� Otl� LO LCj 00 O P O O O LC) N O Ln N O O !} N It lqP tA'j LD N LO N r N. O) O N P M LO LC) P a a P P N P P N P to E Q m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Il- LO Lo Lo N N p � O N M C M N r r N N a0 N 0) N r r r r cor- r N r O O L') Ll V O O O r O N O O N W O N O O O N N Cl) O CO Cf1 Cf1 Cf1 (O p (O (O L-- r O L-- 0') (O (O O 0')O O O C Ln LI7 N LO LO LO LO LO LO :7 : N Ln a) O m fn V O m m LO O LO O O m LO O LO LO O O O M LO LO O (n V O (O (O (O O (O O M O O M (O O N O co (O (O (O co L Q U') U) U) LO N LO N M Lf) Lf) OM In U.) coMN CD CD Lf) In Lf) M O M O0 - O O O p O p p CO O O O O M M O O M M M O M O M V r Lf) Ln Lf) N ._ O r N N M M M N r r C) O0 O0 7 li p a) p d m o 0 0 0 0 0 (.0E (0 O M Cl)r r Z O 0 LL (n (n (n (n N N N u) O (n O H Q H N a) a) a) a) a) a) O a) 06 a) 0 0) Q' C6 U) LY LY LY 0Y 0 0 0 LY O Q' 0 LY Q of 0 F a� m F � N g x� x 'a •-" C a) •-" .--� .--� .--� J J J J J .--� 0 2 J m a) m J c a 02 a a a a a Q a �Z � LL U U co co co co co U co m m (3 0 LL y 7 m Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L? LL LL LL LL LL LL LL �. to c o o iu >o > o a� a� a) c ° o m a� E C N a 7 U O LY O N C o a) E U U U L m E J v, @ a O (0 U U -C _ U) 7 U) U a) LY V) C O O- a) J f6 C a)cm O -O CY)a) U a) U U m O m O J V) Q) Q Y U m S m m a a m m w w m a m m CO g al U LY uu)) O O L1J -a J U Y a) J O Q O O U (O a)O N N 0 w 'O N Q Q' U (0 S O Q O J m m O U CC Y uU .2t c > = O 3: 2 > O O) O) Ur Q a (a (0 d U U N 0 0 0 ~ a) U) m O O m c U a U U U U U LL -i -i -1 O Li 0- LY w H H H Cl) Lf) (D I— a0 O O N M �t LO CO r M an O O N Z T d L d d O O o 0 d LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL 4) M M M , CV CV O O d U) LL LL Li cn Li LL LL LL LL LL LL LL Li U (9 U Q Q Q U Q J J Q Q Q Q Q Q Q U Q V d O L- a. N O N 0 N O N LL Q C LL LL R1 LL RESOLUTION NO. 20-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020/21 IN CONFORMITY WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65103 (c) and 65401 of the State of California Government Code, the Planning Commission has reviewed the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Year 2020/21 as to its consistency with the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan; and WHEREAS, the project is Categorically Exempt (Section 15306-Class 6) from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the analysis and recommendations of Engineering Services Department staff, contained in their Staff Report dated May 27, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND that the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, finds the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2020/21 in conformity with the adopted General Plan. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 27T" DAY OF MAY 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA M. ATTEST: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 27th day of May 2020, by the following vote -to -wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 1 of 1 102 STAFF REPORT DATE: May 27, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN UPDATE - FOUR MONTH STATUS REPORT The General Plan Update kicked off on January 14, 2020. A Core Team of City Staff has been meeting weekly to accomplish the two first tasks of the Update. First, the consultant team has been preparing Existing Conditions reports, which are being reviewed by City staff. Second, the internal and external communications teams have been running a public outreach campaign. This has gone virtual due to COVID19 restrictions. Staff will provide an update to the Planning Commission, and take comments, questions and suggestions as to the information we have compiled. I"I