The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2020-07-08 Agenda Packet - PC-HPC CITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda July 8, 2020 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements,and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID- 19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comment at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.usljoin using Webinar ID: 832 6604 4257 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 832 6604 4257 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 24, 2020. D. Public Hearings - None E. General Business E1. FINDINGS OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FOR REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.85 ACRES WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 10, LOCATED AT 9070 MILLIKEN AVENUE; APN: 0209-272-27. E2. FORUM FOR OUR FUTURE RECAP F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Workshop— None I. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. The public may address the Planning Commission on any agenda item. To address the Planning Commission, please come forward to the podium located at the center of the staff table. State your name for the record and speak into the microphone. After speaking, please complete a speaker card located next to the speaker's podium. It is important to list your name, address (optional) and the agenda item letter your comments refer to. Comments are generally limited to 5 minutes per individual. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under"Public Comments." There is opportunity to speak under this section prior to the end of the agenda. As an alternative to participating in the meeting you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill(a�cityofrc.us by 12:00pm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of$3,114 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Wednesday, July 1, 2020, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. HPC/PC Meeting Agenda —July 8, 2020 Page 2of2 CITY . ■ . ! .01V HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 243 2020 A. Call to Order The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on June 24, 2020. The meeting was called to order my Chairman Guglielmo at 7:00pm. Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, and Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nick Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Brian Sandona, Sr. Civil Engineer; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened the public communications and hearing no comment, closed public communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of June 24, 2020 Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 to adopt the minutes as presented. D. Public Hearings D1. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT DRC2018-00992, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00994, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20148, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018- 00770,TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00867 AND UNIFORM SIGN PROGRAM 2019- 00959—SC WESTBURY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP -A request for site plan and architectural review of a mixed-use development with 131 residential units, 4 commercial ready units and a 1,500-square foot commercial space that includes a tentative tract map for condominium purposes, a request to amend the text and figures related to mixed use development in the Development Code, a Zoning Map amendment to change the zoning from Community Commercial (CC)to Mixed Use (MU), a Tree removal permit to remove 32 trees and a Uniform Sign Program for onsite signage on a 11.44 acre project site in the Community Commercial (CC) District, located on the west side of East Avenue and north of Foothill Boulevard —APN: 1100-191-04. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes —June 24, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Draft 003 CITY . ■ . ! .01V HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 243 2020 Tabe van der Zwaag presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Tabe mentioned in his report that during the public comment period of the Initial Study, staff received comments from CA Department of Fish and Wildlife requesting changes to the timing and protocol for the pre-construction survey for the various species including the Burrowing Owl. The applicant environmental consultant has updated the Initial Study Mitigation monitoring plan with the updated language provided by CDFW. The updated environmental documents are in the package before Commission tonight. In accordance with CEQA guideline Section 150741, staff has determined the updated mitigation measures will be equal and more effective in mitigating the potential project related biological impacts than the original mitigation measures. Tabe also stated for the record staff received a letter today from Debra Kinsinger raising project concerns due to the biological study and mitigation measures in the biological study. The letter states when Debra Kinsinger, who is the consultant for the project to the South, when she did her biological survey for the parcel in 2017, she observed Borrowing Owls on the project site. She requested the Commission require the applicant confer with CDFW prior to certification of the Initial Study. The applicant for the project LSA has provided a letter responding to the comments received by Ms. Kinsinger which states the updated mitigation measures provided by CDFW included in the IS and MMP address the concerns raised related to the potential loss of the Burrowing Owl habitat. Staff has reviewed the updated mitigation measures and while staff is not an environmental expert, they feel the updated mitigation measures appear to address the concerns raised by Ms. Kinsinger. For the record, Resolution 20-29, Attachment A— Page 1 (first paragraph), strike-out line moved when changing the font size during editing. It has been corrected and presented before Commissioners tonight. Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Brandon Roth, Applicant, thanked City of Rancho Cucamonga and staff for all their hard work and looks forward to building in the city. Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated great staff report and the project team did a real good job responding to concerns raised in the workshop. It has a lot of what we just saw in our joint session with City Council in terms of how the land is being used. It will compliment very nicely the project to the South when that gets built. HPC/PC Meeting Minutes —June 24, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Draft 004 CITY . ■ . ! .01V HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 243 2020 Commissioner Williams stated she likes the project, especially the arrangements of the balconies. Expressed her disappointment there is no tot lot. Nonetheless, she likes the project and it will make the corner look very striking with the two projects we have lined up there. Commissioner Dopp stated he agrees with fellow Commissioners. Expressed he likes the street parking, if that helps alleviate some of the concerns on the site, it would be a big benefit. Related to the trail, he would like to add that a project be considered down the line, if there is a way to connect to that trail be considered in the future and address that concern for the residents. Enjoys any opportunity to see mixed-use in some of these areas where we think would be a good utilization. Would like set into the record; what we want to see out of more standard mixed-use developments that come down the pike is we do want to see mixed-use actually mean mixed-use. He realizes this is a special exception due to lot size but for future developers reading into the record recognizing that mixed-use does mean mixed-use. If this was on a different site, he would probably have a problem with it. Chairman Guglielmo mentioned he saw the project at the Design Review Committee. Given the size and shape of the lot, utility, easements, obstructing a large portion of it, they did a great job. A very well- thought-out project. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca to approve Item D1. Motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. E. General Business - None F. Director Announcements Anne McIntosh, Planning Director reminded Commissioners of next week's Forum for Our Future. This is a virtual version of what we would normally do in person with a community workshop. She explained the 3-day workshop schedule in detail. The Commissioners do not have a formal role, but your participation is encouraged so you can hear what is of interest to community members. A final version of the schedule will be provided to Commissioners and will be on the PlanRC website. G. Commission Announcements Commissioner Dopp commented on the presentation by Urban 3 Economic Development last week. He was very impressed with the data and asked that we discuss how the Commission or Planning Department can use this information in the future. It would be a worth-while discussion to have in light of everything that was discussed on Wednesday with City Council. Commissioners agreed. Anne McIntosh mentioned that the data will be used in the development of the General Plan, but that there might be project based applications as well. H. Workshops — None HPC/PC Meeting Minutes —June 24, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Draft 005 CITY OF ! CUCAMONGA �l HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION AND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES JUNE 243 2020 I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp, to adjourn the meeting; motion carried unanimously, 5-0 vote. Meeting was adjourned at 8:00pm. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: HPC/PC Meeting Minutes —June 24, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Draft 006 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mike Smith, Principal Planner SUBJECT: FINDINGS OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY FOR REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION OF APPROXIMATELY 1.85 ACRES WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 10, LOCATED AT 9070 MILLIKEN AVENUE; APN: 0209-272-27 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Adopt the attached Resolution finding that the proposed acquisition of 1.85 acres of real property, for potential economic development, within the Empire Lakes Specific Plan and located at 9070 Milliken Avenue is in conformance with the City's General Plan. SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property (the "site") is a parcel of 1.85 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court. The site is bound on the west by Anaheim Place. The parcel has dimensions of approximately 320 feet (north-south) by 250 (east-west). The site is fully developed with a parking lot which was constructed to provide more parking spaces for the office building located to the west-northwest of the site. The parking lot was not necessary to fulfill any requirement of the Development Code. Following the economic recession of 2007-2008, the need for it diminished and it is currently not in use. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning designation for the site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Parking Lot Mixed Use Planning Area 10* North Metrolink Parking Lot Mixed Use Planning Area 10* South Commercial/Retail Buildings Mixed Use Planning Area 9* East Industrial Buildings General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Office Buildings Mixed Use Planning Area 10* *Empire Lakes Specific Plan BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 65402(a) requires a city's planning agency, i.e. Planning Commission, review and report upon whether the location, purpose, and extent of a proposed real property acquisition by the city for public purposes is consistent with the General Plan as described below: 007 PLANNING COMMISSION DIRECTORS REPORT FINDINGS OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 8, 2020 Page (a) /f a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned, and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The planning agency shall render its report as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof within forty(40) days after the matter was submitted to it, or such longer period of time as may be designated by the legislative body. The City is in the process of the acquisition of the site for potential economic development. It is anticipated the site could be integrated with potential redevelopment on the properties that generally surround the site and on the publicly owned parking lot located immediately to the north of the site that serves the Metrolink train station. Staff has reviewed the proposed real property acquisition and has determined that the location, purpose, and the extent of the acquisition conforms with the applicable policies set forth in the City's General Plan, including: • Land use policy LU-2.1 which states that the City should "plan for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly mixed use and high-density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes" such as the Metrolink station. • Land use policy LU-3.2 which encourages"a mix of retail, service, industrial and manufacturing, and professional uses that create diverse, well-paying employment opportunities" and is a long- term goal of the City. • Land use policy LU-3.7 which encourages "new development projects to build on vacant infill sites within a built-out area, and/or redevelop previously developed properties that are underutilized" such as the inactive parking lot on the property. • Community mobility policy CM-2.2 which encourages "all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors"such as the BNSF railway that is the route for Metrolink (commuter rail service) and Milliken Avenue which is a route for Omnitrans (bus transit). • Community mobility policy CM-3.2 which supports "Omnitrans' expansion of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) into the City...with stops at all major north-south streets..." such as Milliken Avenue. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Vicinity Map Exhibit B - Aerial Photo of the Subject Site Draft Resolution 20-35 of Findings of General Plan Conformity 008 FL all POWA ar_ IN I Churdl 51 Bars No Shops NWcmeGprning • at Terra Visa Victoria Gardens r"h , Target u Ross Dress for Less The Horne Depot 9 - �i icamonga � l F{lJr Points by She raton -rwiceStation 1karin R�nco C'tif:;i, i _-- W Hrskorrc ate 6.6 1`;i ;tFYrrl I.. . — W FOorh Rancho Cucamonga HQJitage L,rn R:111-I-t, i;.,r:... 9 Buffalo Witd Wings a Superior Court z Rancho Walrnart ` ' Cucamonga Quakes 2 v x United States postaI Service 1�411 — — - J Arrow R94ga kii�r ReWW � firrry,u Fi4ule Afrdrr Rime Aa�ow RSMS -mom Vvwiram Ave NORTH CUCAMONGA . � o ROCHESTER '� Etiwanda �r Generating Station rL Subject Propertyiversal 61^� --hnical Institute San 8ernadino o # County-Test Valley... o m _ Costco Wholesaile Feurwh St + Kohl's Fourth 51 raunhsl FOAM 91 San Bernardino Ave T2rget i f 4 4 f AW r ' s� L ,r: - �� Mr Pf IA `.d• "�.' F� �,rl► .4. � � ' dr44 * OL.1"It El %� � # � t r r r• r• r '•� , i Subject Prop er# , i ' � �* 1 P� r r r F i r. * r � • Ir r 4 ! i 1 I F 1' f # r f r 1 / r 'f r r r r O d k ! K' 81 . 1. LBWY °° : #. ' RESOLUTION NO. 20-35 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, FINDING THAT THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF 1.85 ACRES OF REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE EMPIRE LAKES SPECIFIC PLAN, PLANNING AREA 10, AND LOCATED AT 9070 MILLIKEN AVENUE (APN: 0209-272-27) IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN A. Recitals 1. The City of Rancho Cucamonga proposes the acquisition of 1.85 acres of real property as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject acquisition is referred to as the "proposal." 2. On the 8th day of July 2020, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga received and considered the subject Director's Report on said proposal on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced Director's Report on July 8, 2020, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject property(the"site") is a parcel of 1.85 acres located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Milliken Avenue and Azusa Court. The site is bound on the west by Anaheim Place. b. The parcel has dimensions of approximately 320 feet (north-south) by 250 (east- west). The site is fully developed with a parking lot. C. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Parking Lot Mixed Use Planning Area 10* North Metrolink Parking Lot Mixed Use Planning Area 10* South Commercial/Retail Buildings Mixed Use Planning Area 9* East Industrial Buildings General Industrial General Industrial GI District West Office Buildings Mixed Use Planning Area 10* *Empire Lakes Specific Plan 011 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-35 FINDINGS OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 8, 2020 Page 2 d. Government Code Section 65402(a) requires a city's planning agency, i.e. Planning Commission, review and report upon whether the location, purpose, and extent of a proposed real property acquisition by the city for public purposes is consistent with the General Plan as described below: If a general plan or part thereof has been adopted, no real property shall be acquired by dedication or otherwise for street, square, park or other public purposes, and no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned, and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized, if the adopted general plan or part thereof applies thereto, until the location, purpose and extent of such acquisition or disposition, such street vacation or abandonment, or such public building or structure have been submitted to and reported upon by the planning agency as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof. The planning agency shall render its report as to conformity with said adopted general plan or part thereof within forty (40) days after the matter was submitted to it, or such longer period of time as may be designated by the legislative body. e. The City is in the process of the acquisition of the site for potential economic development and integration with potential redevelopment on the properties that generally surround the site and on the publicly owned parking lot located immediately to the north of the site that serves the Metrolink train station; f. The location, purpose, and the extent of the acquisition conforms with the applicable policies set forth in the City's General Plan, including: 1) Land use policy LU-2.1 which states that the City should "plan for vibrant, pedestrian-friendly mixed use and high-density residential areas at strategic infill locations along transit routes" such as the Metrolink station. 2) Land use policy LU-3.2 which encourages "a mix of retail, service, industrial and manufacturing, and professional uses that create diverse, well-paying employment opportunities" and is a long-term goal of the City. 3) Land use policy LU-3.7 which encourages "new development projects to build on vacant infill sites within a built-out area, and/or redevelop previously developed properties that are underutilized" such as the inactive parking lot on the property. 4) Community mobility policy CM-2.2 which encourages "all feasible measures to reduce total vehicle miles traveled by automobiles, including enhanced transit access and land use approaches that provide compact and focused development along major transit corridors" such as the BNSF railway that is the route for Metrolink 012 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-35 FINDINGS OF GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY - CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA July 8, 2020 Page 3 (commuter rail service) and Milliken Avenue which is a route for Omnitrans (bus transit). 5) Community mobility policy CM-3.2 which supports "Omnitrans' expansion of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) into the City...with stops at all major north-south streets..." such as Milliken Avenue. 3. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraph 2 above, this Commission hereby determines that the proposed acquisition of the site for potential economic development conforms with the City's General Plan. 4. This Commission hereby directs the Planning Director to forward a copy of this Resolution to the City Council. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY 2020. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 8th day of July 2020, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 013 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STAFF REPORT DATE: July 8, 2020 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP Planning Director SUBJECT: FORUM FOR OUR FUTURE RECAP DESCRIPTION: Staff will provide a recap of the Forum for Our Future event that occurred on June 29-July 1. EXHIBIT: Exhibit A - Final Schedule 014 OLiAINN- FORUM ON RC OUR FUTURE MULTI - DAY VIRTUAL JOIN ungmity 10 line workshops dinbWsions In®eee fiferaWlthe p h1hqn1hedckwdevoice I - - - - - . . MONDAY, JUNE 29TH • 5:00 pm - 6:30 pm: Kick-off Summit Kick off the interactive Forum on Our Future by participating In this live summit Hbmycfflore about the activities scheduled during the week learn a bit more about PlanRC and receive a summary of the community input WE? received so far through the first online survey stakeholder interviews and emails from residents There will be an opportunity for community comments and questions during and afthm i t TUESDAY, JUNE 30TH • 9:00 am - 10:30 am: Discussion Group 1 R�isgeBeyond Healthcare good t tyts Diversity This session invites community members to explore the aspects of a healthy community that support diversity and inclusion We will talk about topics like access to housing parks social services transportation economic opportunity and more We want to hear about your struggles with health & equity in Rancho Cucamonga What improvements and ideas do you think are needed to make Rancho Cucamonga a healthier and more inclusive community How can better physical planning b9qiaIV increased • 11:00 am - 12:30 pm: Discussion Group 2 xdmkftg Iftmfegsionals ftffimndi1aI The initial PlanRC online survey highlighted that Rancho Cucamonga residents are concerned about housing - with some hoping to limit the development of new housing and others wanting to see more new affordable and diverse housing options Join this session to share your thoughts on how ' Rancho Cucamonga can provide housing options that accommodate the needs of its many families and workers achieve designs that fit with the community and address a growing homelessness concern @" "Eir�i�ngs • 2:00 pm - 3:30 pm: Discussion Group 3 NOtdiResklient biijit*atural The Rancho Cucamonga community has experienced the physical and emotional devastation that natural disasters like windstorms and wildfires can produce This session will ask you to share your thoughts and opinions on how best to boost the resiliency of Rancho Cucamonga The session will engage attendees in discussions about disaster preparedness earthquakes and will also *him *sgjaiu rbility,And • 4:00 pm - 5:30 pm: Discussion Group 4 apd Town Efficiently Mobility in RC How we get around the community affects our quality of life The initial PlanRC survey identified traffic and safety as key issues currently facing our city - but community members also identified numerous ideas and options to move people around the city without a personal car Join this discussion to talk about how Rancho Cucamonga can both address existing traffic and safety issues WrcJkle inventive PahwibiULztransport Exhibit A 015 WEDNESDAY, JULY 1ST • 9:00 am - 10:30 am: Webinar print This webinar will demonstrate how the way Rancho Cucamonga is built drives the way it is funded How the City is funded affects what types of services and infrastructure it can offer By comparing property values per acre we can compare property opples in a way that clearly displays market trends and development opportunities and explore the intersection of building design hand use and tax production Using clear images to demystify the tax system and comparisons from all �artiign s • 11:00 am - 12:30 pm: Discussion Group 5 �ngy comments on the PlanRC survey we should focus on creating high level jobs for our community including in the health industry Of course as a community we need to support the recovery of all our local business amid COVID What do we need to consider to ensure a recovery that will benefit our entire community Join this session to share your thoughts ideas and opinions on growing our 12cam6wp g a • 2:00 pm - 3:30 pm: Discussion Group 6 9 Parks open spaces landscaping active and passive are very important to the Rancho Cucamonga community This session will ask participants to take a deeper dive into the topic How can the City be more creative and inclusive in the development of parks open space and Vandscaping Join this 11 cjt,ts • platlasion wmaj'res Rancho Cucamonga is a community with many assets and unique cultural attributes wine history festivals Quakes theater parks mountains etc All of these contribute to what many would refer to as adnse of place How can Rancho Cucamonga better celebrate its identity and focus on 'Placemaking in the future How do we ensure we are being inclusive as we enhance our sense of community and spaces Don miss this discussion group if you are passionate about creating places TAKE THE NEW PLANRC CHAT ONLINE SURVEY A PLANNER r • plooli u ay Mill I tphiities :i Il'<:: :g M1#1igvements • • or III rvey Cit ofRC.us/General ■ General Plan@Cityof■ rL rri ,r;:;i • pipowwPtiog NiM750 CITYMC.UMENERALPLAN