Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-122 - ResolutionRESOLUTION NO.2020-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2020-005, REVISING CITYWIDE TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF) FOR ALL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF A. RECITALS: 1. On April 18, 1991, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted Ordinance No. 445 creating and establishing the authority for imposing and charging city-wide transportation development fees. 2. On February 19, 2020, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted, Resolution No. 2020-005, establishing city-wide transportation fees as authorized by Ordinance No. 445. 3. The Engineering Services Department is responsible for reviewing the continued need for described capital improvements and revising the cost estimates and fees when appropriate. 4. The San Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) requires that project costs and fees, including Transportation Development Fees (DIF), be updated biennially. 5. The increase for this year is calculated at 4.4%; this is based on the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) Price Index for Construction Items, from 4th Quarter 2019 to 3rd Quarter 2020. The overall effective increase will be 4.45%, which includes the administration fee to manage the DIF program. 6. On December 2, 2020 the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing concerning the fee revision adopted herein. The revised cost estimates and fee calculations applicable to the fee revision were available for public inspection and review ten (10) days prior to this public hearing. 7. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. RESOLUTION: NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, 1. The facts set forth in the Recitals, above, are true and correct. 2. The City of Rancho Cucamonga hereby finds as follows: a. The purpose of the fee revision is to finance transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of traffic generated by new development; and Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 1 of 14 b. The fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance only the public facilities described or identified in Exhibit "A", attached hereto; and c. The construction of the described or identified public facilities is consistent with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan; and d. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the described public facilities, and the mitigation of traffic impacts associated with new development; and e. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee shown in Exhibit "B", and the type of development for which the fee is charged; and f. The cost estimates set forth in Exhibit "A" are reasonable cost estimates for constructing these facilities, and the transportation development fees expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total of these costs. 3. DEFINITIONS: "Development projects" shall mean construction of residential, commercial, industrial, office, or other non-residential improvements, or the addition of floor space to existing improvements. A "development project" includes any project involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction. 2. "Exempted development" shall mean a floor space addition to an existing residential building, and the following types of uses: public schools, colleges, libraries, churches, parks, county jail, or sports complex. 3. "Equivalent dwelling unit" or "EDU", is used to convert all types of land uses into an equivalent unit that enables Nexus fees to be tabulated as dollars per EDU. One residential single family detached housing is equal to one EDU. 4. Payment of Fee: The revised Transportation Development Fee shall be paid per Chapter 3.28 City -Wide System Fee for Transportation Development subsection 3.28.020 Fees established of the RCMC. The City Engineer, or their designee, shall calculate and determine the amount of the fee based upon the rate then in effect at the time of payment. 5. Fee Schedule: The amount of the revised Transportation Development Fee was determined to be $12,708 per EDU. The calculations used to make this determination are shown in the attached Exhibit "C". 6. EDU/Land Use Equivalent Schedule: The calculation of EDU for each land use is based on the trip generation rates shown in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 5th Edition. The EDU for each identified land use type is as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 2 of 14 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU 7. Use of Fee: The Transportation Development Fee shall be solely used to pay for the public facilities described in Exhibit "A", or for reimbursing the City for development's fair share of those capital improvements already constructed by the City, or to reimburse other developers who have constructed public facilities described in Exhibit "A". 8. Administration Fee: The City shall include an Administration Fee in the amount of 15% of the total project cost for the management of the Transportation Fee Program. 9. Fee Review: The Engineering Services Department shall review the estimated cost of the described capital improvements, the continued need for these improvements, and the reasonable relationship between such need and the traffic impacts for the various types of development pending or anticipated and for which the fee is charged. The City Engineer shall report the findings to the City Council at a noticed public hearing, and recommend any adjustment to this fee or other action as may be needed. 10. Effective Date: This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption, provided that the fees as herein amended shall not be imposed by the City until 60 days from the date of the public hearing. 11. Judicial Challenge: Any judicial action proceeding to appeal, review, set aside, void, or annul this resolution shall be brought within 120 days of its adoption. 12. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 3 of 14 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 4 of 14 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 211 day of December 2020. ,1 ATTEST: J ice C. Reynolds, City CI rk STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 2"d day of December 2020. AYES: Hutchison, Kennedy, Michael, Scott, Spagnolo NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAINED: None Executed this 3Id day of December, 2020, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. LIZ- Jai ice C. Reynolds, City Clerk Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 5 of 14 Exhibit "A" Transportation Fee Program Projects & Project Costs F1 I Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $987,800 F2 Foothill Boulevard at 1-15 Freeway - Widen NB & SB On -Ramps $1,532,353 F3 Base Line Road at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange Improvements $22,866,732 F4 Arrow Route at 1-15 Freeway - Interchange $56,995,197 F5 Grove Avenue / 4th Street at 1-10 Freeway - Interchange $6,240,350 Improvements Total: $88, 622,432 Rai/roao' Grade; 5epara#r©ns antlCrossrngs ; " R1 Haven Avenue at Metrolink Crossing - Grade Separation $15,032,310 R2 6th Street W/O Lucas Ranch Road - Improve RXR Crossing Gates $1,220,335 R3 6th Street E/O Santa Anita Avenue - Install new RXR Crossing Gates $1,220,335 R4 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street - Upgrade Existing RXR Crossing Gates $1,974,552 Total; $19,447,532 131 6th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $2,842,826 B2 9th Street at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing Bridge $1,347,916 B3 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Ditch - Widen Existing Bridge $1,322,954 B4 Banyan Street at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $1,506,004 B5 Hellman Avenue at Cucamonga Creek Channel - Widen Existing $8,601,976 Bridge B6 Whitram Avenue at Etiwanda Ditch - Bridge $1,658,546 B7 Wilson Avenue at Day Creek Channel - Bridge $1,707,082 B8 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Creek Channel - Bridge $2,874,721 Total: $21, 862, 026 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 6 of 14 S1 6th Street - Santa Anta Avenue to Etiwanda Avenue - Backbone $923,572 S2 Arrow Route - Grove Avenue to Baker Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $1,867,945 S3 Arrow Route - 500' E/O 1-15 Freeway to 1,300' E/O 1-15 Freeway - $1,550,380 Widen South Side S4 Banyan Street - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen North Side $1,368,717 S5 Banyan Street - East Avenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $11,286,713 Alignment S6 Base Line Road - Etiwanda Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen North $1,363,170 Side 2 to 3 Lanes S7 Cherry Avenue - Wilson Avenue to 1-15 Freeway - Widen West Side $1,651,613 S8 Church Street - Archibald Avenue to Haven Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 $1,769,486 Lanes S9 East Avenue - 1-15 to Victoria Street - Various Bottlenecks $1,131,583 S10 East Avenue - Fire Station to Wilson - New $1,795,834 S11 East Avenue - Wilson Avenue to North Rim Way - New $607,394 S12 Etiwanda Avenue - 6th Street to Arrow Route - Widen 2 to 4 Lanes $5,720,321 S13 Etiwanda Avenue - Miller Avenue to 850' N/O Miller Avenue - Widen $391,062 East Side S14 Etiwanda Avenue - Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue - Curb and $1,288,286 Gutter East Side Only S15 Etiwanda Avenue - Existing Northern Terminus to North Rim Way - $728,041 New S16 Foothill Boulevard - Vineyard Avenue to Hellman Avenue - Widen 4 to $1,669,640 6 Lanes S17 Foothill Boulevard - Hellman Avenue to 700' E/O Hellman Avenue - $2,676,417 Widen North Side Only S18 Foothill Boulevard at Archibald Avenue - Widen Intersection $10,046,964 S19 Foothill Boulevard - Archibald Avenue to Hermosa Avenue - Widen 4 $2,716,632 to 6 Lanes S20 Grove Avenue - 8th Street to Tapia Via - Widen 1 to 2 Lanes East $1,489,364 Side Only S21 Grove Avenue - San Bernardino Road to Foothill Boulevard - Widen 1 $916,638 to 2 Lanes East Side Only S22 Haven Avenue - Base Line Road to 1-210 Freeway - Widen West Side $17,109,653 Only S23 Lower Crest Road - Day Creek Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - $2,227,112 New S24 Miller Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Widen 2 to 4 $3,364,242 Lanes S25 Milliken Avenue - 5th Street to 700' S/O 5th Street - Widen West Side $422,957 Only Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 7 of 14 S26 Victoria Street - East Property Line of Etiwanda High School to 1-15 Freeway - Improve Both Shoulders $407,703 S27 Vintage Drive - Etiwanda Avenue to 1,300' W/O Etiwanda Avenue - New $1,192,600 S28 Wilson Avenue - Milliken Avenue to Day Creek Boulevard - New $9,463,144 S29 Wilson Avenue - Etiwanda Avenue to East Avenue - Backbone Only $783,511 S30 Wilson Avenue - EastAvenue to Wardman Bullock Road - New $8,320,467 S31 Youngs Canyon - Cherry Avenue to Wardman Bullock - New $13,035,398 Total: $109,286,556 Pro ie -:: Es ItllatE ` T1 4th Street at Richmond Place $485,361 T2 4th Street at Utica Avenue $485,361 T3 6th Street at Buffalo Avenue $485,361 T4 6th Street at Cleveland Avenue $485,361 T5 6th Street at Etiwanda Avenue $485,361 T6 6th Street at Hellman Avenue $485,361 T7 6th Street at Pittsburgh Avenue $485,361 T8 6th Street at Rochester Avenue $485,361 T9 6th Street at Santa Anita Avenue $485,361 T10 6th Street at Utica Avenue $485,361 T11 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street $485,361 T12 Archibald Avenue at San Bernardino Road $485,361 T13 Archibald Avenue at Victoria Street $485,361 T14 Archibald Avenue at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T15 Arrow Route at Center Avenue $485,361 T16 Banyan Street at Rochester Avenue $485,361 T17 Banyan Street at Wardman Bullock Road $485,361 T18 Base Line Road at San Carmela Court $485,361 T19 Base Line Road at Shelby Place $485,361 T20 Carnelian Street at Banyan Street $485,361 T21 Carnelian Street at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T22 Cherry Avenue at Youngs Canyon Road $485,361 T23 Church Street at Elm Avenue (West) $485,361 T24 Church Street at Mayten Avenue $485,361 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 8 of 14 T25 Church Street at Ramona Avenue $485,361 T26 Church Street at Terra Vista Parkway $485,361 T27 Civic Center Drive at Red Oak Street $485,361 T28 Ridgeline Place at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T29 Day Creek Boulevard at Madrigal Place $485,361 T30 Day Creek Boulevard at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T31 East Avenue at Miller Avenue $485,361 T32 East Avenue at Highland Avenue $485,361 T33 Etiwanda Avenue at Garcia Drive $485,361 T34 Etiwanda Avenue at Whittram Avenue $485,361 T35 Foothill Boulevard at Cornwall Court $485,361 T36 Foothill Boulevard at East Avenue $485,361 T37 Foothill Boulevard at Malachite Avenue $485,361 T38 Haven Avenue at Trademark Street $485,361 T39 Haven Avenue at Valencia Avenue $485,361 T40 Haven Avenue at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T41 Hellman Avenue at 8th Street $485,361 T42 Hermosa Avenue at Church Street $485,361 T43 Milliken Avenue at 5th Street $485,361 T44 Milliken Avenue at Wilson Avenue $485,361 T45 Rochester Avenue at Jersey Boulevard $485,361 T46 Spruce Avenue at Elm Avenue $485,361 T47 Spruce Avenue at Mountain View Drive $485,361 T48 Spruce Avenue at Red Oak Street $485,361 T49 Terra Vista Parkway at Spruce Avenue $485,361 T50 Terra Vista Parkway at Town Center Drive $485,361 T51 Town Center Drive at Elm Avenue $485,361 T52 Wilson Avenue at East Avenue $485,361 T53 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue $485,361 T54 Wilson Avenue at Etiwanda Avenue (West) $485,361 T55 Wilson Avenue at San Sevaine Road $485,361 T56 Wilson Avenue at Wardman Bullock Road $485,361 T57 Wilson Avenue at Canistel Avenue $485,361 T58 4th Street at Golden Lock Road - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $34,669 T59 Archibald Avenue at Banyan Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade $34,669 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 9 of 14 T60 Arrow Route at Etiwanda Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T61 Arrow Route at Red Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T62 Arrow Route at White Oak Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T63 Banyan Street at East Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T64 Base Line Road at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T65 Base Line Road at Spruce Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T66 Base Line Road at Valencia Avenue - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T67 Day Creek Boulevard at Silverberry Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T68 Day Creek Boulevard at Sugar Gum Street - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T69 Day Creek Boulevard at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T70 Milliken Avenue at Millenium Court - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T71 Milliken Avenue at Mountain View Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T72 Milliken Avenue at Terra Vista Parkway - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T73 Milliken Avenue at Victoria Park Lane - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade T74 Milliken Avenue at Vintage Drive - Left Turn Phasing Upgrade Total: $69,337 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $34,669 $28, 289, 587 Project:':' S11 Signal Interconnect System $10,677,932 Total; $10,677,932 Freeway Interchanges $88,622,432 Railroad Grade Separations and Crossings $19,447,532 Bridges $21,862,026 Streets $109,286,556 Traffic Signals $28,289,587 Signal Interconnect System $10,677,932 Total: $278,186,065 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 10 of 14 Program Total $278,186,065 Less Fund Balance as of 2005-$20,000,000 Sub -Total $258,186, 065 Administration Fee (15%) $38,727,910 Total: $296,913,974 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 11 of 14 EXHIBIT "B" TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT FEES Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $12,708 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit $7,625 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit $7,625 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom $2,542 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed $2,542 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $19,062 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet $15,250 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet $7,625 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet $6,354 Hotel / Motel - Per Room $10,166 Day Care - Per Student $3,177 Self -Storage - Per Unit $254 Service Station - Per Pump $63,540 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 12 of 14 EXHIBIT "C" TRANSPORTATION FEE PROGRAM CALCULATIONS Vacant Residential Property = 950 acres Single Family Dwelling Units (SFDU) = 5,363 units Multi -Family Dwelling Units (MFDU) = 5,248 units Vacant Industrial Property = 719 acres = 31,319,640 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Industrial is 0.5 then the future square footage of industrial development is 31,319,640 square feet x 0.5 = 15,659,820 square feet. Vacant Commercial Property = 334 acres = 14,549,040 square feet Assuming that the average floor area ratio for General Commercial is 0.25, then the future square footage of commercial development is 14,549,040 square feet x 0.25 = 3,637,260 square feet. Different types of land uses have different traffic trip generation rates. In order for nexus fees to be tabulated for each type of land use, the "Equivalent Dwelling Units" or EDU for each type of land use must first be determined. The calculation of a particular land use type's EDU is based on the traffic trip generation rate for that land use from the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Per City Resolution No. 91-092, the EDU for various land uses was determined to be as follows: Land Use Type EDU Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 13 of 14 Single -Family 5,363 Units 1.00 5,363 Dwelling Unit Multi -Family Dwelling 5,248 Units 0.60 3,149 Unit Industrial Park (per 15,659,820 Square 0.60 9,396 1,000 SF) Feet Commercial (per 3,637,260 Square 1.50 5,455 1,000 SF) Feet Total Future EDU 23,363 :Fees . . .. ... Total Cost of Projects $219,199,343 Total Future EDU as of February 2005) 23,363 Cost per EDU $9,382 Ca/culate Transportation Development; Fees by Land Use Residential - Single Family Detached Unit 1.0 EDU $12,708 Residential - Multiple Family Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $7,625 Apartment or Condominium - Attached Unit 0.6 EDU $7,625 Senior Housing Attached Unit (Condo or Apartment) — Per Bedroom 0.2 EDU $2,542 Nursing / Congregate Care - Per Bed 0.2 EDU $2,542 Commercial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.5 EDU $19,062 Office / Business Park - Per 1,000 Square Feet 1.2 EDU $15,250 Industrial - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.6 EDU $7,625 Warehouse - Per 1,000 Square Feet 0.5 EDU $6,354 Hotel / Motel - Per Room 0.8 EDU $10,166 Day Care - Per Student 0.25 EDU $3,177 Self -Storage - Per Unit 0.02 EDU $254 Service Station - Per Pump 5.0 EDU $63,540 Resolution No. 2020-122 - Page 14 of 14