Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-03-10 Agenda PacketHistoric Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda March 10, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM’S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comment at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 919 7586 0899 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 919 7586 0899 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B.Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C.Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 24, 2021. D.Public Hearings D1. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 (LOCATED AT 8005 CAMINO PREDERA) – RENEE MASSEY – An appeal of a Planning Director approval of a request to construct a 3,300 square foot single-family residence with two separate attached 2-car garages totaling 1,063 square feet on a vacant property of 15,601 square feet (0.36-acre) within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District located at 8005 Camino Predera – APN: 0207-631-06. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. HPC/PC Agenda – March 10, 2021 Page 2 of 3 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00533, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018-00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018- 00535, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536, & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218 (LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 200 FEET EAST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE) – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1.36-acre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. E. General Business E1. A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Denying a Conditional Use Permit for Alcoholic Beverage Sales Under DRC2020-00087 and Recommending that the City Council Deny a Request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459 on a 2.33 Acre Lot within the General Industrial (Gi) District at 8768 Archibald Avenue; and Making Findings in Support Thereof – APN: 0209-032-35. F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Workshop - None I. Adjournment TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. For each of the items listed under “PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS”, the public will be provided an opportunity to speak. To address the Planning Commission via Zoom App, click the “Raise Hand” button when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. On Zoom via phone, you can also raise your hand by pressing star *, then 9 when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. HPC/PC Agenda – March 10, 2021 Page 3 of 3 If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under “PUBLIC COMMENTS.” As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:00pm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CityofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission’s decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk’s Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,206 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). Please turn off all cell phones while the meeting is in session. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, March 4, 2021, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda February 24, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on February 24, 2021. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Guglielmo at 7:00pm. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Dopp, Commissioner Morales, Commissioner Williams. Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Sean McPherson, Sr. Planner; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Sr. Planner; Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar C1. Consideration to adopt Regular Meeting Minutes of February 10, 2021. Minor correction in the Roll Call; removing Darrelle Field, City Attorney and replacing with Nicholas Ghirelli. Motion by Commissioner Morales, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 5-0 to adopt minutes as amended. D. Public Hearings Chairman Guglielmo recused himself from Item D1 due to owning one of the units in the building of this proposed project. Vice Chair Oaxaca will take over. D1. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTT19996 (LOCATED AT 9353 FAIRVIEW PLACE) – NADER QOBORSI FOR BUTTERFIELD VILLAS, LLC - A request to convert an existing 7,004-square foot office building on a 1-acre parcel (43,608 square feet) of land into 8 office condominium units and shared common areas in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Sub Area VIII of the Empire Lakes Specific Plan; APN: 0210-082-69. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15301. 004 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 2 of 8 Draft Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Vice Chair Oaxaca asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing Item. With no questions from the Commission, Vice Chair Oaxaca opened the public hearing. Nadar Qoborsi, Applicant, requesting Commissioners approval of the project and is available to answer questions. Commissioner Dopp, asked if there was good feedback from business owners in terms of buying back the complex once it went up for sale. Nadar Qoborsi referred it over to Mr. Batniji, who is the owner of building, to answer that question. Samir Batniji, Owner, answered at present time it is not for sale. It could be an open door in the future, but he intends to maintain most of it. With no public comments, Vice Chair Oaxaca closed public hearing. Commissioners expressed general support of the project it is straight forward. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Morales. Motion carried 4-1-0 to adopt Resolution 21-11. Recuse - Guglielmo. Chairman Guglielmo resumed his position as Chairman and continued the meeting. D2. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW & DESIGN REVIEW DRC2016-01017 (LOCATED AT 88269 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD) – MARTHA SCHACHT FOR CHAGO TORTAS AHOGADAS – A request for site plan and architectural review of a 2,456 square foot restaurant with an 858 square foot second-story office area on a 24,189 square foot parcel of land in the Mixed Use (MU) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and San Bernardino Road at 88269 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0207-113-23 and 24. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 (construction of small structures). Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing Item. Vice Chair Oaxaca mentioned he noticed in the site plans and color renderings, there are areas with lattice covers over on side of building and it’s noted on one of the plans those areas would accommodate outdoor dining. He asked would that be the plan that those areas. Tabe van der Zwaag replied it would be a great place for outdoor seating but as they are maxed out on parking due to the office building in the interior seating, there is not enough parking available for outdoor seating. 005 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 3 of 8 Draft Commissioner Dopp stated as a follow up, he asked if there is a situation that maybe something comes up and they come back asking for that in the future. What is the process. Tabe van der Zwaag responded that there is always a possibility they could do a minor exception after they have been in business a little bit and it’s clear there is adequate parking for the outdoor seating area. He said we could give them a minor exception which can be up to 25% of the required parking. Anne McIntosh, Planning Director, added we are doing a code update and revisiting parking requirements. She said if the parking ratio changed, it would be an opportunity for the applicant to be able to use that space. Commissioner Dopp stated there is certainly a chance there may be an overflow parking at some point if restaurant is successful. He asked what does the parking situation look like on San Bernardino Road. Are people allowed to park on the side as curbside parking. Tabe van der Zwaag replied a bit of an issue is Vince’s Spaghetti is a very popular restaurant and they have been encroaching on this site for their parking. There may be a point in the evenings that each will be hunting on the street for parking. With no other questions from the Commission, Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing. Martha Schact, Applicant, thanked the Commissioners and is available to answer questions. Commissioner Dopp asked what will their restaurant look like and if she can elaborate compared to Montebello site. Martha Schact described what kind of food they will serve and how their tortas are made. Commissioner Dopp asked if they have very long waiting lines for food service. Martha Schact responded the only way to pick up tortas is in parking lot and waiting to receive as curbside. No drive thru. Buzz Cuccia, Vince’s Spaghetti, mentioned his concern is the parking situation impacting the area with traffic and asked how many seats will they have inside for dining. Expressed he is in support for the restaurant being there. Martha Schact responded they will have 17 tables (4 people per table) to hold 68 people inside capacity is what they are proposing. With no more comments from the Public Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Commissioner Dopp expressed his concern of public parking but not enough to deny the project. He thanked applicant for choosing Rancho Cucamonga. Commissioner Williams is excited about the project at that site. She added since it is located at a point (intersection of Foothill Blvd. and San Bernardino Rd.) she suggested Public Art would be a great location at that point for a Route 66 art, big, bright and attractive. 006 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 4 of 8 Draft Commissioner Morales stated it’s a nice mixed-use building with office on the second floor. Expressed he likes the Spanish architecture design and agrees with Commissioner Williams about Public Art on that corner suggesting a mural or statue if owner/applicant desires to do so. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated he agrees with his fellow Commissioners. Expressed it’s a nicely designed project. He said he shares Commissioner Dopp’s concern in parking. Parking does become a bigger issue when the business becomes successful and hopes it does not create issues for the business in the future. He mentioned this is an applicant that successfully runs another restaurant in the Montebello area and it’s great that they see an opportunity to bring the same concept here. Chairman Guglielmo asked about the Public Art potential and if there is any way to make it a requirement as a Commission. Nick Ghirelli explained under the City Ordinance it is an in-lieu fee, so the applicant has the opportunity to provide the art on the site or contribute to the City or pay the in-lieu fee to the City. He said assuming the applicant does pay the in-lieu fee, these comments are still well taken and important because the Public Art Committee can take those comments and consider using the money for art at that corner. Anne McIntosh mentioned we can certainly work with them on that option to place a piece of art at that corner. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 vote to adopt Resolution 21-10 D3. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY DRC2020-00459 (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) – ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS – A new commercial building with a fueling station and convenience store proposing off-site alcohol sales located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 – In-Fill Development Projects Sean McPherson, Senior Planner presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and oral presentation (copy on file). At the end of Sean’s presentation, he mentioned the Applicant had prepared their own PowerPoint slideshow to present tonight to the Commissioners. Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on the Public Hearing Item. Commissioner Dopp asked how ABC comes up with the number of liquor license allowed within a census tract. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained there is a standard set forth in the business and professions code and for off-sale retail licenses. He said the ratio to population in the census tract in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the County within which the applicant premises are located. He said you would compare the census tract with general County numbers. 007 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 5 of 8 Draft Commissioner Dopp regarding the tract, he is not sure what a neighborhood in Vineyard has to do with a neighborhood in Archibald with a bunch of industrial buildings in between. He asked staff if there is a larger big box establishment for liquor license vs. smaller convenient stores and do we weigh things differently when we look at retail establishments vs convenient stores. Sean McPherson replied there is no difference really if a business like Target, for example applied for a Type 20 alcohol license opposed to a mom-and-pop shop. There is really no distinct difference as it relates to a request for alcohol license. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked staff if they have Historical background on how this census tract was shaped and that he is not sure how they grouped everything together. It seems the census tract designation has a different purpose and he is looking at a combination of the off-sale licenses with and without gas stations that are within the census tract. We got Target; Aldi; big box retailers compared to small businesses still applying for sale type off-sale licenses. He asked if there is any history or background on how we got to this point with this level of concentration at this part of the City. Sean McPherson responded he does not have detailed history on the existing off sale alcohol licensing in this census tract. Anne McIntosh mentioned after Commissioners have heard all of the testimony and still have questions relevant to making a decision, at the end of your discussion and give us an opportunity to answer those questions after tonight’s meeting and come back to a subsequent meeting. With no other questions from the Commission, Chairman Guglielmo opened the public hearing. Grant Ross, Applicant, presented Commissioners with a PowerPoint presentation. (Copy on file). Requests Commissioners to come back on March 10th with a resolution to get the project approved. Commissioner Dopp asked how did they arrive at $108,000 sales tax total. Grant Ross replied they hired and engaged a 3rd party that studied locations throughout California. Commissioner Dopp asked to what extent would he be willing to go above and beyond to address some of the local residence concerns. Grant Ross responded, as owner of the property, he would supply his personal cell phone number to call him personally to address any concerns. Commissioner Williams asked what is the possibility in the future you might decide to sell and make it a franchise store rather than keep it as a lab store. Grant Ross replied he will let 7-Eleven answer the question but as for him being the holder/owner, he will maintain long-term. Michelle Moore, 7-Eleven Development Team, presented Commissioners with a PowerPoint presentation highlighting some things of interest and why they selected Rancho Cucamonga. (Copy on file) The following persons commented on the project: Suket Dayal; Pat (Resident Discovery Village); Eva. The comments included the following concerns: 008 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 6 of 8 Draft • Beer sold across the street from Middle and Elementary School • Gasoline Fumes and chemical exposure • 24/7 noise • Prefer grocery store not convenience store • Requests denial of applicant to sell Alcohol. For the record, it is noted that the following correspondences was received after the preparation of the agenda packet and the following general concerns are noted: The actual correspondence should be referred to for details: • Email received from Hector Hernandez to oppose the project due to being across street from schools and sale of alcohol. • Email received from Craig Scheu is in favor of the project. • Letter received from Dennis Barahona is in favor of the project. • Letter from Don S. is in favor of the project. • Letter from Mark A. is in favor of the project. • Email received from Jim Wood, member of Old Spanish Trail Assoc. requesting to continue signage in Rancho. Jon Shardlow, Applicant, described the highlights of having a 7-Eleven store. He also answered Commissioner Williams question and they have no plans to sell to a franchisee. He said it will stay as a corporate store. Commissioner Williams asked about the possibility of having a EV charging station and what is the percentage it will be added. Jon Shardlow explained they can certainly commit to that and just put in the Conditions of Approval. He said if any additional permitting is needed, he does not want to commit if it will require further discretionary action. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Anne McIntosh stated the applicant presented fiscal analysis which is really the City’s analysis to conduct. She said if the Commission is inclined to approve the project, we would ask for the opportunity to do that analysis ourselves and not rely on the estimates given by the applicant because we do not agree with them. Concerns are not any individual part of this, we all agree the building is beautiful, landscaping is nice, it’s the combination of all that is being asked, gas, convenient store, alcohol. She believes this location is favorable because it’s on Archibald, a high traffic street. People passing through would probably be people buying gas here, not necessarily local residents. If you want to think about charging stations, we can take back to applicant and talk to them about it. She suggests your conversation focus around some of these concerns and whether or not you think it would be addressed and want more information or want to see some changes as it is proposed. Commissioner Williams stated she has concerns because she really likes the building but mentioned if this was to go forward, the illumination of the sign should definitely not be facing the residents living nearby. She is also concerned about the school and it’s a real problem. She said it doesn’t make any sense to have alcohol sales across from a school. She asked if there was any chance corporate would look at having a non-alcohol store and become more of a grocery store provider. She suggested to possibly having beer and wine at Laredo Tacos not be taken beyond a certain point on the property. Maybe it is something to look at in the coming future. 009 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 7 of 8 Draft Commissioner Morales stated the project does meet all the relevant development standards relating to the planning and overall design. He expressed he likes the lab store and fresh food destination. He believes that 7-Eleven is a responsible retailer and the applicants made a good presentation, but it is a tough decision for him. He looked at the census tract map of all the locations of liquor sales and they are in close proximity. He mentioned one thing that did stand out to him is their off-sale alcohol establishment is 1 block north and south of the project. He heard the concerns of residents about the school across the street and it is concerning to him that another off-sale alcohol establishment might be added to this immediate area. Vice Chair Oaxaca asked staff when active off-sale licenses within the census tract combination of Type 20 and Type 21 licenses come up for renewal, is there any discretionary action available to the City at this point. His concern is when an applicant comes into a situation and it’s not of their doing and proposes a project and comes into a situation where it’s basically a mess already, he was wondering is there any discretionary action available to the City at the time these licenses come up for renewal. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, explained the City does not have any involvement in renewal process for ABC Licenses. He said the City’s roll in alcohol licensing is this one situation where ABC determines there is an over concentration of licenses in a census tract and ABC will ask the City if they want to issue this public convenience or necessity determination. Vice Chair Oaxaca stated he had a chance to review the project in Design Review and it was presented very well. These other issues where not within the scope of our evaluation of the project. There is a significant issue which is the proximity of the availability of off-site cash and carry type sales of beer and wine that close to schools and the potential attempts of underage individuals to purchase alcohol from these locations. He said the EV charging station is a great idea. He has no concern about the gas station portion of the project with environmental concerns have been addressed according to Staff. He said the overriding consideration for him is the proximity to the schools and the availability off sale of beer and wine as part of this project. Commissioner Dopp stated there has been a lot of conversations about alcohol and proximity of the schools and he has the same concerns. He said we have heard over the last couple of years in the General Plan process and from residents and again today this idea that S.W. Cucamonga is greatly underdeveloped economically relative to rest of the city and there are worse outcomes for residents living in that area of the city. What message are we sending to residents in that area of the city if we approve another convenience store for them. There has been a lot of talk about how much we need to address people in that part of city and at some point, it just becomes talk. He said we have to start to make actions and decisions that reflect values we are trying to enshrine as a community for those people. On a fundamental level ethically speaking, he has a real problem that the best we can do for that part of town is low amenity opportunities. We need to do better. Chairman Guglielmo stated a lot of good points have been raised are for the project, against the project. He asked do we want to have additional research done on this. Nick Ghirelli, City Attorney, stated just to be clear, whatever decision you make tonight staff is not recommending you make a final decision on the project because we don’t have a resolution with written findings one way or the other. There is an opportunity to craft a motion to provide direction to staff to work with applicant and if certain conditions are met, we can bring back a resolution to satisfy that direction or if conditions are not met, staff can bring back a resolution to deny the project. 010 HPC/PC Meeting MINUTES – February 24, 2021 Page 8 of 8 Draft Anne McIntosh mentioned if Commission wanted to make a decision to deny and asked to bring back a resolution, there are components to this project that if the applicant decided we wanted to remove part of it because Commission did not like, they could reapply. She said you can deny it without prejudice so they can come back with a revised application. Motion by Commissioner Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 vote to direct staff to prepare a resolution to deny the CUP for Alcohol establishment and to recommend City Council to deny the PCN and Staff to work with the applicant to consider the other entitlements and bring back a resolution based on that discussion. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Workshop - None I. Adjournment Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Morales to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5-0. Meeting was adjourned at 10:15pm. Respectfully submitted, ________________________ Elizabeth Thornhill Executive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: 011 AMENDED SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY – An appeal of a Planning Director approval of a request to construct a 3,300 square foot single-family residence with two separate attached 2-car garages totaling 1,063 square feet on a vacant property of 15,601 square feet (0.36-acre) within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District located at 8005 Camino Predera – APN: 0207-631-06. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission consider the applicant’s appeal and and direct staff to return to the Planning Commission with the appropriate Resolution. PROJECT BACKGROUND: The Planning Director approved Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 on January 25, 2021. The approval was appealed by the appellant on February 3, 2021 within the 10-day appeal period. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The 15,601-square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera. The property’s dimensions are approximately 80 feet along the north and south property lines, and approximately 195 feet along the east and west property lines. The downslope lot has an elevation of 1,315 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line, and an elevation of 1,280 at the south property line, for a total grade change of 35 feet from the north to south property lines. The street improvements have been installed along Camino Predera, except for street trees and parkway landscaping. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use Mixed-Use (MU) District East Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L)Residential District West Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner 012 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATON OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY March 10, 2021 Page APPEAL: The letter, prepared by the appellant and included with the appeal of DRC2020-00016, dated February 3, 2021, outlines the following concerns related to the approved project: 1. That the project was not forwarded to the Planning Commission for review and decision. 2. That a neighborhood meeting was not conducted for the project. 3. That precedent has been set by the approval of other recent projects with lower building profiles (height) along Camino Predera. 4. That the balcony/decks on the subject house potentially impact the privacy of the adjacent residences. 5. That the Conditions of Approval for the project require the planting of street trees, potentially impacting views. ANALYSIS – RESPONSE TO APPELLANT’S COMMENTS: Planning Commission Review: Development Code Section 17.16.140 (Hillside Development Review) states that the Planning Director shall be the approving authority for Hillside Development Review applications. The only exceptions to this requirement are 1) when excavation (cut) or fill of soil that is proposed with the grading of the project site exceeds 5 feet in depth and/or 2) if a related entitlement such as a Variance for a technical standard, e.g. building setback or lot coverage, is necessary as part of the project scope. In those circumstances, the Planning Commission is the approving authority. In this case, the subject project complies with each of the related Development Code requirements for single-family residential development in the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District as shown in the following table: Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Building Height (measured from finished grade) 25 Feet-3 Inches 30 Feet (maximum) Yes Front Building Setback (measured from the curb at Camino Predera) 54 Feet 37 feet (+/- 5 feet) (minimum) Yes Side Building Setbacks (measured from the side property lines) 10/15 Feet 5/10 Feet (minimum) Yes Rear Building Setback (measured from the rear property line) 97 feet 20 Feet (minimum) Yes Excavation (depth) Less than 5 feet 5 Feet (maximum) Yes 013 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATON OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY March 10, 2021 Page Neighborhood Meeting: The Development Code does not require neighborhood meetings to be conducted as part of the development review process. It has been Planning Department policy to recommend that applicants hold a neighborhood meeting for certain types of development review applications such a residential subdivisions, shopping centers, and industrial buildings. The applicant determined that they did not wish to have a neighborhood meeting for the project. Staff notes to the Commission that these meetings provide the applicant the opportunity to inform others of the project. The meetings themselves do not function in any required advisory role to the approving authority. Building Height: The maximum permitted height within the Hillside Overlay District is 30 feet above finished grade. Development Code section 17.11.020.D.2 states that the design of the structure should give consideration to lot size and configuration to minimize the appearance of overbuilding and the blocking of views. The approved project has a maximum height of 25 feet-3 inches as measured from finished grade and a maximum height of 13 feet as measured above the top of curb on Camino Predera. The Development Code does not include a maximum height as measured from the top of curb. The adjacent house to the east is approximately 9 feet taller than the approved project. The most recent house to be completed along the south side of Camino Predera is approximately 14 feet above top of curb. While the two most recent Hillside Design Review approvals along the south side of Camino Predera have had a lower building height as measured above top of curb, that height was based on topography, architectural style, and owner preference. There is no requirement or policy for a maximum building height as measured above top of curb. Balcony/Decks: The approved project includes a 406 square foot first-floor deck on the south elevation, off of the living room; an 85 square foot second-floor deck on the east elevation, off of a loft; and a 92 square foot second-floor deck on the south elevation of the second floor, off of the master bedroom. The two smaller decks each include solid-walled railings and provide similar views as a standard window. The Development Code does not include a restriction on the size or location of balconies and decks provided that they comply with the maximum lot coverage for the entire lot and building setbacks. There is also no City policy limiting second story balconies and decks related to potential privacy concerns. Street Tree Planting: Tract Map 10035, of which the project site is Lot 6, includes a condition of approval requiring the installation of street trees, i.e trees along the public right-of-way. The Engineering Department's condition of approval included with the approved project is a reiteration of the original street planting requirement. Staff notes to the Commission that the planting of street trees, when they are absent along the street frontage, is a standard condition for all new development. ANALYSIS – DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE: Design Review Committee: Pursuant to Section 17.16.140 of the Development Code, the Planning Director is the approving authority for Hillside Development Review applications. Prior to Planning Director review and action, Hillside Development Review applications are reviewed Retaining Wall Height 3 Feet 4 Feet (maximum) Yes Lot Coverage (maximum) 16.8 Percent 40 Percent (maximum) Yes 014 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATON OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY March 10, 2021 Page by the Design Review Committee. This Committee reviews a proposed project’s architecture and site planning and then provides recommendations to the Planning Director for consideration. The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee on January 19, 2021 (Oaxaca, Williams, Smith). The Committee received staff’s report and comments from the applicant and the general public. Public comments received in support of the project focused on the project’s compliance with the requirements of the Development Code and the appropriateness of the design within the context of the surrounding neighborhood. Public comments received in opposition to the project focused on the height of the structure in relation to the top of curb, potential loss of privacy, and the potential impact on views from neighboring properties. Committee member Oaxaca noted that the City does not have a view protection ordinance. He noted that the Development Code states that the height of a building (house) shall not unduly block views and that the design of the house shall minimize the blocking of views. Committee member Williams stated that a building height of 9 to 10 feet (above the top of curb on Camino Predera) may be more appropriate. Staff noted that due to the “downslope” condition of the property, the height of the house was about 13 feet above the top of curb of the street. Both Committee members otherwise felt that the applicant had made significant changes to the project during the design review process. They supported the design and layout of the proposed residence. The Committee recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Director for review and action. Planning Director Approval: The Planning Director’s approval of the subject project on January 25, 2021 was based on the project’s compliance with the intent and regulations of the Development Code for lots within the Hillside Overlay District as stated in the director’s approval letter (Exhibit A), and which are summarized as follows: 1. The proposed single-family residence complies with all applicable development standards for the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District. 2. The residence was designed in compliance with Section 17.122.020.D.2 of the Development Code including stepping the building pads to follow the existing slope and the use of hip roofs oriented in the same direction as the natural slope. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of decks on the side and rear elevations. The residence will be painted earth tone colors, as recommended in the Hillside Design Guidelines, and will be in keeping with the existing residences along Camino Predera, which include a variety of architectural styles and themes. The two-car garage on the upper level faces Camino Predera, with a second side entry two- car garage located on the lower level, accessed by a curving driveway with an up to 20 percent grade. Section 17.122.020.C.1.d. of the Development Code states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. The driveway to the lower garage follows the existing grade of the lot and places the additional garage space below street level, thereby reducing the massing of the residence as seen from Camino Predera. 015 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATON OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY March 10, 2021 Page 5 3. The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 35 feet from the north to south property lines. The proposed grading design limits cut and fill to the greatest extent possible. Fill is limited to 27.8 cubic yards and cut is limited to 21 cubic yards. The residence is stepped with the existing grade and includes a garage on the lower level, reducing the overall massing of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. Earthwork is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence and access driveway, with the rear yard is left mostly undisturbed. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the overall size of the residence is in keeping with the more recent residences constructed along Camino Predera. 4. The design provisions for development in the Hillside Overlay District as described in Section 17.122.020 - Hillside Development requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building “envelope”. The applicant has provided two north-south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. 5. Although there is no “view preservation” requirement in the Development Code, the applicant has designed the proposed house in a manner that minimizes view obstructions. The residence has a maximum height of 13 feet when measured above top of curb on Camino Predera. Additionally, in conformance with Section 17.122.020.D.2. of the Development Code, the proposed house has side yard setbacks of 10 and 15 feet to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding, i.e minimize the visual massing of the house and minimize view obstructions. 6. The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 6.8 cubic yards of fill, with the majority of the cut/fill necessary to construct the driveway and the lower side entrance garage. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,303 feet and the lower pad at an elevation of 1,294, in conformance with Section 17.122.020.D.1.a of the Development Code to terrace the building to follow the slope. 7. Section 17.122.020.G.1.J.ii of the Development Code permits up to 4-foot high retaining walls downslope from the residence. The height of the proposed retaining walls for the project is below the 4-foot height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. These retaining walls are necessary to construct the driveway, the foundation of the house, and retain soil along the side property lines. Each of the retaining walls will be constructed of tan split face block. 8. The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Section 17.122.020.F of the Development Code, including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and the planting of shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. 016 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CONSIDERATON OF APPEAL DRC2021-00035 – RENEE MASSEY March 10, 2021 Page 6 FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City’s annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project promotes the Council’s core values of building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere. The proposed single-family residence will provide much-needed housing in the City and develop a vacant lot which was originally approved for subdivision (TT10035) on March 25, 1981. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 24, 2021. On that same date, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners (146 property owners) within a 660-foot radius of the project site. No correspondence has been received in response to these notices. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Planning Director Approval Letter Dated January 25, 2021 Exhibit B - Full Set of Plans Exhibit C - Staff Report TT10035, Resolution of Approval 81-34 and Standard Conditions for Original Tentative Map Exhibit D - Letter of Appeal Dated February 3, 2021 Exhibit E - Design Review Committee Comments and Minutes Dated January 19, 2021 017 Exhibit A 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 Exhibit B030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 CITY OF RANCHO CUC ONGA s C`C^AJ\ 7STAFFREPORT O -O DATE: March 25, 1981 TO: Planning Commission 19» FROM: Barry K. Hogan, City Planner BY: Otto Kroutil , Associate Planner SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10035 THE DEVELOPERS - A residential subdivision of 15.7 acres of land into 38 custom lots in the R-1-12 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207-101-37 and 207-092-10 BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting approval of a 38 lot, 15.7 acre custom lot subdivision, generally located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon (Exhibit "A" ) . The project site is currently vacant, and slopes south and southeasterly with a maximum re lief of about 100 feet. The site has a moderate growth of grass, weeds, shrubs, and some trees. Along the southeast boundary, the site abuts the Southern Pacific Railroad right-of-way and tracks. The proposal has been reviewed as a custom lot subdivision by the Growth Management Review Committee in accordance with the Growth Management Ordinance, and received a point rating in excess of the required threshold. However, the conceptual grading plan has not yet been cleared by the Grading Committee due to several concerns and issues described in this report. ANALYSIS: The proposed custom lot subdivision, shown on Exhibit A" is consistent with both Interim and Proposed General Plan Land Use designations of Low Density Residential . The surrounding land uses and zoning are described as follows . LAND USE ZONING Site Vacant R-1-12 North Single Family R-1-12 East Railroad, Vacant F-P South Railroad, Vacant A-P and R-1 West Multi-Family, Condos R-3-T The subdivision map has been prepared in accordance with the State Sub- division Map Act and the City' s Subdivision Ordinance. The basic street pattern has been predetermined, to a degree, by the existence of Camino Predera on the north. A secondary access is needed which most logically ITEM FExhibit C 041 TT 10035 Staff Report 2- March 25, 1981 should occur off Red Hill Country Club Drive in the northwest portion of the site. Further, due to the substantial grades the subdivision designs are rather limited. As requested by Staff, a topographic model has been prepared by the applicant for the Com- mission' s review. Since this Tract Map was filed, the applicant has worked closely with Staff to resolve a number of concerns. However, in spite of a substantial effort to resolve potential problems , the following areas of concern remain to be resolved, and should be addressed by the Commission: 1 . Grading - The applicant is proposing substantial 12 to 1 fill slopes on lots 2 through 9 on the down-side of the proposed street, as well as moderate 2 to 1 fill slopes on several lots on the up-side. Staff is concerned with the future develop- ment of lots 1 through 9; as can be easily seen on the topo- graphic model the nature of the grade would necessitate split- level construction with garages possibly located within the front yard setbacks (Exhibit "C" ) . Should this subdivision be approved, Staff would recommend that appropriate restrictions be recorded with the subdivision map which would enable the Commission and/or the Design Review Committee to retain strict control over the development of each of these parcels. In addition, the grading plan should also be revised to eliminate slopes in excess of 2 to 1 . 2. Geologic Hazards - Due to the site' s proximity to the inferred location of the Red Hill Fault the project site is located with- in the Special Study Zone. According to the proposed General Plan Public Health and Safety Super Element, restrictions which apply within State designated Fault Special Studies zones also apply to the City adopted Special Studies Zone for the Red Hill Fault. As required, a report prepared by a certified engineering geologist. has been prepared and submitted to the City (Exhibit D" ) . The report concludes that no faults , active or potentially active, were observed in exploratory trenches or are known to exist within ' the subject site. The Red " Bill Fault is inferred to pass some 750 feet south- erly of the site. The report further concludes that the 042 TT 10035 Staff Report 3- March 25, 1981 probability of ground surface rupture is considered remote. However, it is recommended that a condition be placed on the map to require the Building Official to critically review each units structural integrity and if necessary, require increased structural standards. 3. Landscape Maintenance - Appropriate provisions should be made for the disposition and maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right-of-way purposes. Available options include: a. Extra wide parkways with low maintenance landscaping and inclusion of such areas in a landscape maintenance district. b. Transfer of ownership of the unneeded areas to the adjacent property owners, if they so desire. c. Inclusion of the two areas in lots 1 and 38. This option does not appear practical due to potential maintenance problems. The transfer of ownership optionappears to be preferable, however, should the adjacent property owners refuse the left-over areas, inclusion of the areasin a maintenance district is recommended. Also attached for your review is Part I of the Initial Study as completed by the applicant. Staff has completed Part II of the Initial Study, the Environmental Checklist, and has conducted a field investigation. Pending satisfactory resolution of the grading and seismic safety issues described in this report, the issuance of a Negative Declaration, with appropriate mitigation measures, would be appropriate. CORRESPONDENCE: The tentative map has been advertised as a public hearing item in the Daily Report newspaper. In addition, approximately 70 public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the proposed subdivision. To date, no correspondence has been received. 043 TT 10035 Staff Report 4- March 25, 1981 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing to receive all public comments. If, after such hearing, it is felt that the areas of concern raised by Staff have been resolved to the Commission's satisfaction, the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval , with conditions , would be appropriate. ARR ctfully, su fitted, r" HOGANanner BKH:OK:cd Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Vicinity Map Exhibit "B" - Tract Map Exhibit "C" - Cross Sections Exhibit "D" - Geologist's Report Initial Study, Part I Resolution of Approval Conditions of Approval 044 cE reu cN _ c 2 ii- zc m aL usa.E tt j II 1 ` i Lt p 1 c E7 g REO NTLI GO E CM FOO7FULL OlW 00THILL FOory ig<O 9E NANO NO Fn/p s o B ew oovou t o onvouyc c wN o iLLLLLLLI_11LL1 ARROW APJkOw NovTe SNA Sr a V 1 NORTH CITY OF ITEM: RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE PLANNING DIVISKAN EXHIBIT:_ SCALE 045 gyp. 1\' 1 kY\ 1 '/// i /• q / / /,// . T- r•' /// / A r _— _.....„. a+ Ms iu• cT 1' 1 r - 1 /:.. l o • '. prr ` v w• aurt.. 11 . h / Glfl ).. 1 aw. e / / f r_ - rr•/ T4Cielou v o.. MCR M• R/. v Y 1. •• HMLka 4• g1, 4u1• / AK may- j/ .' .. LW4 W* 1 F - ice/ ' o / '.. p' ' >.• stir ime to IW 3 I tStlfl t HLN r. see weer hs rof Le6AL DtNCM MYKr/ axes, Ms• / r. i' /"' . i / i / \-_: ururiee nc L ett bection Tentative Tract No. 10035 NCNO CVCAMt m an r ' 3tATt aCt C., ros /• be LOTS O" ttr V or t went, tarw. Y Y,, ve 046 brrrNna 1lIg11 w. l Muc IhMmq Non* l t { Ir 1P• ra tq t1• pw' L[ Vy0' Y 6 wlrY YYNrcT N L11MINi YMIK P I. I. IIr I. sa. i ' Kw M1OI• V' Y7 M11ML 4 YN lMt f I. LY1I IYIrtJ. N tI Yr4L I V IONP ' alrclo uL, nRl4! l hYI MI• M r/ Ir V. ilLYVi iNiW' MNI111I. \ I. 1" rn, NW l7r;•\ v. • 1w' YI• I 1 Yw!!!! K Lw VY MY Pn4rniN 1. ruo wrl• w\ V, YM( WI1r i Y[ IwY. XXXur•:• lY. NGWr,• iV 1 i/M oYYY M.•. M / Yy1MM wIN• -- IN{ N•( a fY YIYMF WI. fY Nµ WIP 1M WI• I.. lLY.. i![ Y•. IrLTI MrViI tV IYufYV 9Y lilt/ 1w 1Ltt. 1NY•• Y• la• eN N! Pxuxx INx1 MI YLY P Y w uprtV oti rxX hM" M1Y, ti,' r; Yr t WO[ Yd r6 IFf41 A, k w' i• rtllLl N IV!! Mtlu t4r• W1r, YW 91[ ILI t41 tIVIN1 MN 1 ! F Xi(•( I. 1T9 M l 1, y! Iu• A!. Lwv Qr flWW r° lu. nw.•. a.. 1 1 GalL6 CARAZON F- P a 1 VICINITY I KEY lAAP x Ml rN' .. . w./ r. 1 ^.:..' II __:.•. 1, 1 , , S' i. ' r 11 I i.' n T T' - t, r-.., r• 11i 1`-'':_ t-/ _ j ' j rf Wit` MgiRmwvt oTwfrllnVlfr INC, 7PY Y{ MIFi HL+" N11 9DW 777fF• P q p tiii rylN n•- MVI r y/ y 319P7 X1NINfiIl1F w4pLYV. 9_ 0-MI/ ry' W v / f FYIaW: E, l l/ PF 1. WY 1 a b f 1 v' i n)• mww l I it I 1' s q 14` j' / r' c+• ttw. 0. rwii••• w arw o a Q' 1. Jr w t ypv Z i i 0. rrnwL Y ,. , ea.+ i N i 1 / 1- . Tentative Tr 71 r, Ct No. 10035 1 1 I 1/ Il r, rte• l / / C QJ O O 1/ /, ' ( I ' Ill/ 1 I rti/ .// f1 LOT! 1 i PAXT I CP T eNE[ ie no+!! Nr 111 AIR, 1 047 p' gg w ti WY l 1 'M 1 dia A I t A-A 6Xi5t rdl 1 1 twwwwawawwaww\ 1 10 1 1 1 GAR-------------- 1• 1, I R/fR/K/T AXIS? ' DR i LR/FBF/BR s 40,FiN 15H G- G CITY OF ITEXl: RANCHO CUCAMONNGA TITLE: PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT: SCALE: 048 4 Baseline Consultants Inc. 15307 MINNESOTA AVE. SO/LS ENG/NEER/NG-ENG/NEER/NG GEOLOGY PARAMOUNT, CALIF. 90723 213) 633-8152 I E August 27, 1980 1 f Project No. 611-080 i Action Engineering Consultants 5402-A Commercial Drive I Huntington Beach, California 92649 Subject Reference : Tentative Tract 10035 Rancho Cucamonga California Gentlemen: 1 This is to report the results of a geology and seismicity l study of the above referenced property. According to the State of California Special Studies Zone Maps , the subject property isI not within an area suspected to be underlain by traces of an active earthquake fault, however, known or inferred faults are reported to pass near the site. In order to determine whether a trace of a fault is present in the near surface soils , an explora- tory trench was excavated across the site, and the earth materials 1 encountered were carefully examined and logged. Orientation of the trench was made in order to intercept any suspected trace at nearly right angles to the trench. Plate 1 depicts the location i of the site relative to general topography, nearby streets and E landmarks, while Plate 2 presents a graphic log of the earth materials encountered in the trench. I GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SETTING The property is situated on the south flank off bd Hill, at 049 Action Engineering 2- 611-030 an average elevation of 1300 feet above sea level. As disclosed by the exploratory trench, numerous outcrops, and reference to published geologic literature, the site is immedi- ately underlain by deposits of older alluvium and fanglomerates . These deposits are reported to overlie a thick Tertiary sedimentary section and granitic basement rocks at depth. FAULTS Major earthquake faults known to exist in southern California are shown on Plate 3. Table One lists faults considered "active" , that is , faults which break all formations , including alluvium, have an observable topographic expression, and have undergone movement accompanied by earthquakes during historic time, or have been so designated as active by the State of California, Division of Mines and Geology. No faults , active or potentially active were observed in the exploratory trenches or are known to exist within the subject property. No faults, offset strata, or indications of post ground movement were apparent in the natural earth materials as exposed in the trenches. The Red Hill fault is reported to pass some 750 feet southerly of the site. No traces of this fault or any other were encountered in the near surface deposits of the subject property. SEISMICITY Tables One and Plate 3, attached, have been developed from various sources to show the distance to known active and potentially 050 i Action Engineering 3- 611-080 active faults in southern California considered pertinent to the site. The sources of information include prominent textbooks ,on geology and seismicity, state and county publications, as well as data disseminated by both public and private agencies involved with earthquake measuring and monitoring. While not all sources agree on all items due to the "state of the art" at the present time, the tables and plates included in this report are believed to present a fair and reasonable evaluation of the available data. Plotted or estimated epicenters of recorded larger magnitude earthquakes, which have taken place in southern California since 1769 , are presented on Plate 3. The major and most recent reference concerning the geology of the area, "Geologic Hazards in South- western San Bernardino County, California" , 1976 , C.D.M.G. Special Report 113, indicate that the maximum credible rock accelerations to be anticipated at the site earthquakes in the vicinity of South- western San Bernardino County are generated by a 8. 5 magnitude earthquake or the San Andreas fault, 0 . 40g, generated by a 7 . 5 magnitude earthquake on the San Jacinto fault, 0. 41g, and generated by a 6. 5 magnitude earthquake on the Cucamonga fault, 0 . 558. Distances from the site to known major faults are presented on Table 1. Groundwater Reference to published literature indicates that groundwater levels are in excess of 50 feet below the site surface. 051 Action Engineering 4- 611-080 SECONDARY SEISMIC HAZARDS Liquefaction: Ground failure due to liquefaction is considered highly unlikely since groundwater lies at a depth below which liquefaction can occur. The near surface soils do not appear to be subject to liquefaction even if saturated. Earthquake Induced Landslides : No existing landslides which could be reactivated by earthquake forces are present on the site. No imminent slides were observed on the subject property or on immediately adjacent properties. Tsunamis : The site is located approximately SO miles from the ocean, at an elevation of 1300 feet above sea level, which precludes it from the effects of a seismic sea wave. Seiches: No inland bodies of water, which would be subject to seiching, are located in the vicinity of the site. CONCLUSIONS Because no faults are presently known to exist beneath the site, the probability of ground surface rupture is considered remote. It is concluded that the proposed site development is feasible from the engineering geology point of view. Respectfully submitted, BASELINE CONSULTANTS chard P. Cousineau, CEG 32 RPC/jm 8) Action Engineering 052 Wilson m I Banyan Banyan ch a ds¢L 19th i o y Eto Rd E Base Line U i 40 ; op 0'' ft.h 100040- Foothill - e i 40 i Arrow 8th 6th ilk c U 4 m Y E j d Sa m 4th v aY 0 a V I NORTH CITY OF ITEM RANCHO CUCAMONGA TITLE PLANNING DIVISION EXHIBIT SCALE: 053 RESOLUTION NO. 81-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 10035 WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, hereinafter "Map" submitted by The Developers, applicant, for the purpose of subdividing the real property situated in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as a custom lot subdivision of 15.7 acres of land in the R-1-12 zone, located south and east of Red Hill Country Club Drive, south of Calle Corazon - APN 207-101-37 and 207-092-10 into 38 lots, regularly came before the Planning Commission for public hearing and action on March 25, 1981; and WHEREAS, the City Planner has recommended approval of the Map subject to all conditions set forth in the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has read and considered the Engineering and Planning Divisions reports and has considered other evidence presented at the public hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does resolve as follows: SECTION 1 : The Planning Commission makes the following findings in regard to Tentative Tract No. 10035 and the Map thereof: a) The tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; b) The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with all applicable interim and proposed general and specific plans; c) The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed; d) The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat; e) The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems; f) The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. 054 Resolution No. 81 -'4 Page 2 g) That this project will not create adverse impacts on the environment and a Negative Declaration is issued. SECTION 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 10035, a copy of which is attached hereto, is hereby approved subject to all of the following conditions and the attached Standard Conditions : PLANNING DIVISION 1. Prior to final map recordation, appropriate provisions shall be made for the disposition and/or maintenance of areas adjacent to the two existing single family residences on Red Hill Country Club Drive which are not needed for right-of-way purposes. Such provisions shall be approved by the City Engineer and the City Planner. 2. If this tract is to be developed as a custom lot subdivision, the precise design and placement of all structures on all lots shall be subject to approval by the Design Review Committee prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Appropriate restrictions to this effect shall be recorded along with the final map. 3. The Building Official shall critically review the structural integrity of each unit in this tract as it relates to seismic safety. If, in the opinion of the Building Official , additional structural elements are needed, then they shall be so required. ENGINEERING DIVISION 4. Prior to final map recordation, the precise alignment of Camino Predera at Red Hill Country Club Drive shall be revised to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 5. Installation of a stormdrain system from existing inlet at Red Hill Country Club Drive to the existing inlet structure at Cucamonga Creek Channel including dedication of easements shall be required to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 6. All existing easements lying within the future right-of- way are to be quit claimed or delineated as per the City Engineer' s requirements, prior to recordation of the tract map. 7. Final plans and profiles shall show the location of any existing utility facility that would affect construction. 055 Resolution No. 81-34 Page 3 8. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. 9. Private drainage easements with improvements for cross lot drainage where required shall be delineated or noticed on the final map. 10. Sewage for lots 1-21 shall be accomplished in common and maintained by C.C. & R. 's by the developer prior to the release of all improvement bonds for the tract or other alternatives to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Building Official . APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MARCH, 1981. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: z. Richard Dahl , Chairman ATTEST: Secretary of the Planning Commission I , JACK LAM, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 25th day of March, 1981 by the following vote to- wit. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Sceranka, Tolstoy, King, Rempel , Dahl NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None 056 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARD CONDITIONS l Subject: Applicant: Location: .5 Those items checked are conditions of approval . APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE PLANNING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. Site Development 1. Site shall be developed in accordance with the approved site plans on file in the Planning Division and the conditions contained herein. 2. Revised site plans and building elevations incorporating all conditions of approval shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. V1 3. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable City Ordinances in effect—at time of Building Permit- issuance. 44. The developer shall provide all lots with adequate sideyard area for Recreation Vehicle storage pursuant to City standards. 5. Mail boxes, in areas where sidewalks are required, shall be installed and located by the developer subject to approval by the Planning Division. 6. Trash receptacle areas shall be enclosed by a 6 foot high masonry wall with view obstructing gates pursuant to City standards. Location shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 7. If dwellings ;re to be constructed in an area designated by the Foothill Fire Districts as "hazardous", the roof materials must be approved by the Fire Chief and Planning Division prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. A sample of the roof material shall be submitted to the Planning Division for--review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 9. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners, shall be architecturally integrated, shielded from view and the sound buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning and Building Divisions. V 10. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all conditions of approval contained herein shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. 057 11. A detailed lighting plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height and method of shielding. No lighting shall adversely affect adjacent properties. 12. All swimming pools installed at the time of initial development shall be solar heated. 13. Texturized pedestrian pathways across circulation aisles shall be provided throughout the development to connect dwellings with open spaces and recreational uses. 14. All trash pick up shall be for individual units with all recepticals kept out of public view from private and public streets. 15. Standard patio cover plans shall be submitted to and approved by the City Planner and Building Official prior to occupancy of the first unit. 16. All buildings numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination. 17. Solid core exterior doors, security dead bolts and locks shall be installed on each unit in this project. 18. Security devices suchas window locks shall be installed on each unit. 19. All units within this development shall be preplumbed to be adapted for a solar water heating unit. 20. Energy conserving building materials and appliances are required to be i-ncorporated into this project to include such things as but not limited to reduced consumption shower heads, better grade of insulation, double paned windows, extended overhangs , pilotless appliances , etc. 21. This development shall provide an option to home buyers to purchase a solar water heating unit. 22. Emergency secondary access shall be provided to this tract to the satisfaction of the Foothill Fire Protection District. 23. Local and Master Planned Equestrian Trails shall be provided throughout the tract in accordance with the Equestrian Trail Plan for Alta Loma. A detailed equestrian trail plan indicating widths , maximum slopes , physical condition, fencing and weed control in accordance with City equestrian trail standardsshall be- submitted to and approved by the City Planner prior to approval and recordation of the final map. 24. This tract shall form or annex to a maintenance district for maintenance of equestrian trails. 058 25. This project shall provide percent of affordable housing and/or rents, in conformance with General Plan housing policies and the housing criteria defined in the Growth Management Ordinance. Affordability shall be determined by current market rates, rents and median income levels at the time of construction of the project. Proof of this provision - shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to finalizing building permits and occupancy of the units. B. Parking and Vehicular Access 1. All parking lot landscaped islands shall have a minimum inside dimension of 4' and shall contain a 12" walk adjacent to parking stall . 2. Parking lot trees shall be a minimum 15 gallon size. 3. All two-way aisle widths shall be a minimum of 24 feet wide. 4. Emergency access shall be provided', maintenance free and clear, a minimum of 24 feet wide at all times during construction in accordance with Foothill Fire District requirements. 5. All parking spaces shall be double striped. 6. All units shall be provided with automatic garage door openers. 7. Designated visitor parking areas shall be turf blocked. 8. The C.C. & R. 's shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this site unless they are the principle source of transportation for the owner. 9. No parking shall be permitted within the interior cirulation aisle other than in designated visitor parking areas. C.C. & R. ' s shall be developed by the applicant and submitted to the City Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. C. Landscaping 1. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Existing trees shall be retained wherever possible. A master plan of existing trees showing their precise location , size and type shall be- completed by the developer. Said plan shall take into account the proposed grading and shall be required to be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division prior to approval of the final grading plan. 059 3. Existing Eucalyptus trees shall be retained wherever possible and shall be trimmed and topped at 30' . Dead, decaying or potentially dangerous trees shall be approved for removal at the descretion of the Planning Division during the review of the Master Plan of Existing On-Site Trees. Those trees which are approved for removal may be required to be replaced on a tree-for-tree basis as provided by the Planning Division. tl 4. Street trees, a minimum of 15 gallon size or larger, shall be installed in accordance with the Master Plan of street trees for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and shall be planted at an average of every 30' on interior streets and 20' on exterior streets. 5. A minimum of 50 trees per gross acre, comprised of the following sizes , shall be provided within the development; 20%- 24" box or larger, 70°0-15 gallon , and 10`0-5 gallon. 6. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and thriving condition, free from weeds, trash, and debris. 7. All slope banks in access of five (5) feet in vertical height shall and are 5: 1 or greater slopes be landscaped and irrigated in accordance with slope planting requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Such slope planting shall include but not be limited to rooted ground cover and appropriate shrubs and trees. All such planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units , an inspection of the slops shall be completed by the Planning Staff to determine that it is in satisfactory condition. In the case of custom lot subdivisions, all such slopes shall be seeded with native grasses upon completion of grading or an alternative method of erosion control satisfactory to the Building Official . Irrigation on custom lot subdivisions shall be provided to germinate the seed and to a point 6 months after germination. t/ 8. All parkways, open areas , and landscaping shall be fully maintained by a homeowners association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of maintenance-shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of building permits. 9. The front yard landscaping, and an appropriate irrigation system, shall be installed by the developer in accordance with submitted plans. 10. The final design of the perimeter parkways , walls , landscaping and sidewalks shall be included in the required landscape plans and shall be subject to approval by the Planning Division. 11. A minimum of specimen size trees shall be planted within the project. 12. Special landscape features such as mounding, alleivial rock, speciman size trees , and an abundance of landscaping is required along 060 D. Signs 1. Any signs proposed for this development shall be designed in conformance with the Comprehensive Sign Ordinance and shall require review and approval by the Planning Division prior to installation of such signs. 2. A uniform sign program for this development shall be submitted to the- Planning Division for their review and approval prior to issuance of Building permits. 3. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are not approved with this approval and will require separate sign review and approval . E. Additional Approvals Required 1. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Director Review shall be accomplished prior to recordation of the final subdivision map. 3. Approval of Tentative Tract No. is granted subject to the approval of Zone Change and/or Variance/Conditional Use Permit 4. This Conditional Use Permit is granted for a period of month(s) -at which time the Planning Commission may add or delete conditions or revoke the Conditional Use Permit. 5. The developer is required to obtain the following signed statement by purchasers of homes which have a private or public equestrian trail on or adjacent to their property. In purchasing the home located on Lot Tract on I have read the C. C. & R. 's and understand that said Lot is subject to a mutual re- ciprocal easement for the purpose of allowing equestrian traffic to gain access. Signed Purchaser Said statement is to be filed by the developer with the City prior to occu-pancy. 1/6. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to issuance of building permits, when no subdivision map is involved , written certification from all affected School Districts , shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development which states that adequate school facilities are or will be capable of accommodating students generated by this project. Such letter of certification must have been issued by the School District within sixty (60) days prior to the final map approval in the case of the subdivision map or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 061 h t,°` 7. Prior to approval and recordation of the final map, or prior to the issuance of building permits when no map is involved, written certification from the affected water district, that adequate sewer and water facilities are or will be available to serve the proposed project, shall be submitted to the Department of Community Development. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within sixty (60) days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. For projects using septic tank facilities allowable by the Santa Ana Regional Water Control Board and the City, written certi- fication of acceptability, including all supportive information , shall be obtained and submitted to the City. 8. This approval shall become null and void if the tentative subdivision map is not approved and recorded or building permits issued when no map is involved, within twelve (12) months from the approval of this project unless an extension has been granted by the Planning Commission. V" 9. This subdivision was not submitted as a total development package and is required to reapply for a point rating relative to the design section of the Growth Management Ordinance prior to final approval and recordation of the map if the subdivision is going to be developed as tract homes. APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE BUILDING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: F. Site Development 1. The applicant shall comply with the latest adopted Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, National Electric Code, and all other applicable codes and ordinances in effect at the time of approval of this project. 1/ 2. Prior to issuance of building permits for combustible construction, evidence shall be submitted to the Foothill District Fire Chief that water supply for fire protection is available. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for a new residential dwelling unit(s) or major addition to an existing unit(s) , the applicant shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: City Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Systems Development Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees, and School Fee. 4. Primo r to the issuance of a building permit for a new commercial or industrial development or addition toan existing development, the applicant shall pay development fees at the es_tablished rate. Such fees may include, but not be limited to: Systems Development Fee, Drainage Fee, Permit and Plan Checking Fees. 5. This approval shall become null and void if building permits are not issued for this project within one year from the date of project approval . 1. 6. Street names and addresses shall be provided by the building official . 062 7. Dwelling units shall be constructed with fire retardant material and non-combustible roof material . 8. All corner dwellings shall have the building elevation facing the street upgrade with additional wood trim around windows and wood siding or plan-ons where appropriate. G. Existing Structures 1. Provide compliance with the Uniform Building Code for property line clearances considering use, area and fire-resistiveness of existing buildings. 2. Existing building(s) shall be made to comply with current Building and Zoning regulations for the intended use or the building shall be demolished. 3. Existing sewage disposal facilities shall be removed, filled and/or capped to comply with appropriate grading practices and the Uniform Plumbing Code. H. Gradin 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the Uniform Building Code, City Grading Standards and accepted grading practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the - approved conceptual grading plan. Z2. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. 3. A geological report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted at the time of application for grading plan check. t/G. The final grading plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning, Engineering and Building Divisions and shall be completed prior to recordation of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permit whichever comes first. . APPLICANT SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR COMPLIANCE 14ITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: I. Dedications and Vehicular Access I. Dedications shall be made by final map of all interior street rights-of-way and all necessary easements as shown on the tentative map. 2. Dedication shall be made of the following missing rights-of-way on the following streets : additional feet on additional feet on additional feet on 063 3. Corner property line radius will be required per City standards. 4. All rights of vehicular ingress to and egress from shall be dedicated as follows: 5. Reciprocal easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels over private roads, drives, or parking areas. 6. Adequate provisions shall be made for the ingress , engress and internal circulation of any trucks which will be used for delivery of goods to the property or in the operation of the proposed business. J. Street Improvements 1. Construct full street improvements including, but not limited to, curb and gutter, A.C. pavement, sidewalk, drive approaches, parkway trees and street lights on all interior streets. 2. Construct the following missing improvements including, but not limited to : CURB & A.C. SIDE- DRIVE STREET A.C. WHEEL STREET NAPE GUTTER PVMT. WALK APPR. LIGHTS OVERLAY CHAIR RAMPS OTHER G` 3. Prior to any work being Performed in the public right-of-way, an encroachment permit and fees shall be obtained from the City Engineer' s Office, in addition to any other permits required. L.%" 4. Street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer and prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer shall be required , for all street improvements , prior to issuance of an encroachment permit. L,^ 5. Surety shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the CitjlAttorney, guaranteeing completion of the p-Ublic - improvements, prior to recording of the map or the issuance of building permits, whichever comes first. Y 6. All street improvements shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, prior to occupancy. il 7. Pavement striping, marking, traffic and street name signing shall be installed per the requirements of the City Engineer. 064 K. Drainage and Flood Control b--* 1. The applicant will be responsible for construction of all onsite drainage facilities required by the City Engineer. 2. Intersection drains will be required at the following locations: 3. The proposed project falls within areas indicated as subject to flooding under the National Flood Insurance Program and is subject to the provisions of the program and City Ordinance No. 24. 4. A drainage channel and/or flood protection wall will be required to protect the structures by diverting sheet runoff to street. 5. The following north-south streets shall be designed as major water carrying streets requiring a combination of special curb heights, commercial type drive approaches , rolled street connections , flood protection walls , and/or landscaped earth berms and rolled driveways at property line. L. Utilities 1 . All proposed utilities within the project shall be installed underground including utilities along major arterials less than 12 KV. a 2. Utility easements shall be provided to the specification of the serving utility companies and the City Engineer. k/ 3. Developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing public utilities, as required. r , 4. Developer shall be responsible for the installation of street lighting in accordance with Southern California Edison Company and City standards. 5. Water and sewer system plans shall be designed and constructed to meet requirements of the Cucamonga County Water District (,CCWD) , Foothill Fire District and the ;Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance form CCW D will be required prior to recordation. 6. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities and other interested agencies involved. Approval of the final map will be subject to any requirements that may be received from them. M. General Requirements and Approvals 1. Permits from other agencies will be required as follows : A. Caltrans for: B. County Dust Abatement required prior to issuance of a grading permit) L.-,C. San Bernardino County Flood Control District D. Other: Via.'"l,t .Z7c ','- Lc/ ?I1., cc'c z e f 'C 065 2. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R`s) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners Association, subject to the approval of the City Attorney, shall be recorded with this map and a copy provided to the City. f" 3. Prior to recordation, a Notice of Intention to form Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the City Council . The engineering costs involved in Districts Formation shall be borne by the developer. 4. Final parcel and tract maps shall conform to City standards and procedures. 066 Exhibit D 067 068 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag January 19, 2021 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00016 – SAURABH PATEL – A request to construct a 3,300 square foot single-family residence with two separate attached 2-car garages totaling 1,063 square feet on a vacant property of 15,601 square feet (0.36-acre) within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District located at 8005 Camino Predera – APN: 0207-631-06. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Site Characteristics: The 15,601-square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Camino Predera in the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District. The property’s dimensions are approximately 80 feet in width along the north and south property lines, and approximately 195 feet in depth along the east and west property lines. The downslope lot has an elevation of 1,315 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line, and an elevation of 1,280 at the south property line, for a total grade change of 35 feet from the north to south property lines. The street improvements have been installed along Camino Predera, except for street trees and parkway landscaping. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District North Single-Family Residences Low Residential Low (L) Residential District South Multi-Family Development Mixed-Use Mixed-Use (MU) District East Single-Family Residence Low Residential Low (L) Residential District West Vacant Land Low Residential Low (L) Residential District Project Overview: The applicant proposes constructing a 3,300 square foot single-family residence with two attached 2-car garages totaling 1,063 square feet on a vacant property in the Low (L) Residential District located at 8005 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-06. Architecture: The proposed residence has a Mediterranean design theme, which includes the use of a clay tile roof, smooth troweled stucco finish, cast stone window and door surrounds, wrought iron accents, and decorative garage doors. The residence was designed in compliance with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including stepping the building pads to follow the existing slope/terrain of the subject property and the use of hip roofs oriented in the same direction as the natural slope. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of decks on the side and rear elevations. The residence will be painted earth tone colors, as recommended in the Hillside Design Guidelines, and will be in keeping with the existing residences along Camino Predera, which include a variety of architectural styles and themes. The two-car garage on the upper level faces Camino Predera, with a second side entry two-car Exhibit E 069 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00016 – SAURABH PATEL January 19, 2021 Page 2 garage located on the lower level, accessed by a curving driveway with an up to 20 percent grade. Hillside Development Standard 17.122.020.C.1.d. states that driveways with grades up to 20 percent are permitted when they are aligned with the natural contours of the lot and are necessary to achieve site design goals. The driveway to the lower garage follows the existing grade of the lot and places the additional garage space below street level, thereby reducing the massing of the residence as seen from Camino Predera and limiting view obstructions. The proposed single-family residence meets or exceeds all applicable technical development standards for the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District, as shown in the table below: Proposed Project Development Code Compliant? Building Height 25 Feet-3 Inches 30 Feet YES Building Height (Top of Curb) 13 Feet 30 Feet YES Front Setback 54 Feet 37 feet (+/- 5 feet) YES Side Setbacks 10/15 Feet 5/10 Feet YES Rear Setback 97 feet 20 Feet YES Building Separation 20 feet N/A YES Excavation Less than 5 feet 5 Feet YES Retaining Wall 3 Feet 4 Feet YES Street Facing Garage 1 Double N/A YES Lot Coverage 16.8 Percent 40 Percent YES House Square Feet 3,300 Square Feet Lot Coverage YES Garage Square Feet 1,062 Square Feet Lot Coverage YES Porch/Patio SF 483 Square Feet Lot Coverage YES Grading and Site Planning: The proposed grading design limits earthwork import to 6.8 cubic yards of fill, with the majority of the cut/fill necessary to construct the driveway and the lower side entrance garage. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the upper pad at an elevation of 1,303 feet and the lower pad at an elevation of 1,292, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a to terrace the building to follow the slope. Retaining walls are below the 4-foot height limit for hillside lots and are necessary to construct the driveway, the foundation of the house, and along the side property lines. Each of the retaining walls will be constructed of tan split face block. Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.J.ii permits up to 4-foot high retaining walls downslope from the residence. 070 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00016 – SAURABH PATEL January 19, 2021 Page 3 The proposed landscaping is designed to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F, including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and the planting of shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is not within the High Fire Hazard Zone or a wildland-urban interface area. The proposed landscaping also complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area. Hillside Overlay District Compliance: The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The project site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 35 feet from the north to south property lines. The proposed grading design limits cut and fill to the greatest extent possible with fill limited to 27.8 yards and cut to 21 yards. The residence is stepped with the existing grade and includes a garage on the lower level, reducing the overall massing of the structure as seen from Camino Predera. Earthwork is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence and access driveway, with the rear yard is left mostly undisturbed. The proposed design does not require any Variances or Minor Exceptions to allow for deviations from technical requirements of the Development Code, and the overall size of the residence is in keeping with the more recent residences constructed along Camino Predera. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided two north- south and two east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. The Development Code does not include a view preservation ordinance. However, the applicant has designed the residence to be sensitive to the potential for view obstructions as seen from Camino Predera. The residence has a maximum height of 14 feet above top-of-curb. Additionally, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.2., the residence has increased side yard setbacks to 10 and 15 feet to avoid the appearance of overbuilding or crowding and to minimize view obstructions. Staff Comments Through multiple rounds of review, the applicant has modified the plans to address staff comments related to architecture, site planning, and technical issues. The original plan submittal was for a 3,956 square foot two-story residence with generic architecture, a 715 square foot three-car garage on the first floor, and a 540 square foot unfinished basement. The original side yard setbacks were 7 feet along the east property line and 13 feet along the west property line. The final design before the Design Review Committee is for a 3,300 square foot two-story residence with a Mediterranean design theme. The three-car garage has been modified to a two-car garage, with a second side entrance garage on the lower level. The side yard setbacks have been increased to 10 feet along the east property line and 15 feet along the west property line. With the changes outlined above, staff supports approval of the proposed single-family residence. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the 071 DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00016 – SAURABH PATEL January 19, 2021 Page 4 Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee recommend that the Planning Director approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: First Submittal Plans Dated January 9, 2020 Exhibit B: Final Submittal Plans Dated November 19, 2019 Exhibit C: Public Comment (CB), COA and Exhibits Exhibit D: Public Comment (SP), Approval Letter and Site Plans 072 073 074 075 076 077 078 079 080 081 082 083 084 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00533, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536 , & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218 - ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1.36-acre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: • Approve Design Review DRC2018-00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018 -00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. • Recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The project scope is for the site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center. Project approval is contingent on the approval of related General Plan/Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation of one of two parcels that makes up the project site from a residential land use/zoning designation (Low Medium (LM)) to a commercial land use/zoning designation (General Commercial(GC)). Based on the State of California’s “no- net-loss” requirement, the loss of potential residential development on the one project DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner 085 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00219 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 related parcel of land, requires that loss to be made up on other parcels in the city. The project includes rezoning two adjacent parcels of land to a higher residential density to make up for the lost potential residential units on the project site. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The “L” shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located on the parcel of land to the west of the project site, at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved the reactivation of this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and Zoning Map (DRC2015-00684 amendments changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a carwash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,078 square foot automated “express” car wash, and a separate Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District (2 -4 du/acre) East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation 086 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 1,296 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The existing single- family residence on the project site will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The first floor of the carwash building is comprised of an enclosed carwash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 roll-up service doors, an office area, and a restroom. Three separate shaded canopies will be provided in the parking lot area with individual self-service vacuums, totaling 32 stalls along with 8 customer/employee parking stalls. The carwash is designed to recycle 86 percent of the wash water. Development Code Section 17.90.030-E (Drive-In and Drive-Through Uses) states that drive-through lanes are required to be set back 45 feet from the ultimate curb face and 300 feet from an intersection. Development Code Section 17.90.030 allows for deviations from the above provisions through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review. The development standards that apply to the project are as follows: Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 40 parking spaces. Land Use Required Parking Provided Parking Car Wash/ Detail Center 16 Stalls 40 Stalls Development Criteria Minimum Requirement Proposed Compliant? Building Setback (along Arrow Route) 45 feet 78 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback (from Street) 45 feet 45 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback (Intersection) 300 feet 190 feet No* Rear Building Setback (at north property line) 0 feet 60 feet Yes Side Building Setback (at east property line) 20 feet 20 feet Yes Side Building Setback (at west property line) 5 feet 100 feet Yes Parking Setback (along Arrow Route) 25 feet 50 Feet Yes Landscape Setback 45 feet (average)/ 30 feet (minimum) 45 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 percent 26 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 35 percent (maximum) 11 Percent Yes * Deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review permit. 087 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 Access to the site will be provided by a 40-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the carwash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The carwash and detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of-way. B. General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2019-00534 : The project includes a request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to change the General Plan land use and zoning designations for one parcel of land (APN: 0208 -291 - 03) within the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, and for two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APNs: 0208-291-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M)/Medium (M) Residential District, respectively. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California’s 2017 Housing Package, which, among other housing bills, included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce or eliminate residential density for a parcel if there is a sufficient replacement of residentially zoned land so that there is “no net loss” of residential development capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City’s regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity as a result of this project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations for two non-project related parcels (APNs: 208-29-01 and -02) as described previously. 088 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 5 The subject 0.85 -acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 vs 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will, in turn, make the project compliant with the “no net loss” provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments will also be compatible with the existing and future land uses surrounding the project site. The proposed car wash is designed to minimize potential impacts on the surrounding land uses. The vehicle entrance to the car wash will be shared with the adjacent service station and will be approximately 270 feet from the nearest residential land use. Noise making equipment related to the car wash and vacuum stations will be located within an enclosed equipment room, reducing noise levels below the maximum noise levels permitted for a residential land use. The car wash building will be positioned on a north-south axis, further reducing any potential noise or light impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center located to the north of the project site will provide a buffer between the proposed carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. The proposed General Commercial designation is compatible with the General Commercial designation to the south. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments increasing the permitted residential density of the non -project related parcel to the east will also not impact the continued use of the existing single-family residence (Beverly Hills House) for residential purposes. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states “Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate.” The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population’s carwash needs and will support the surrounding community’s needs as Arrow Route is identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states “Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas.” The development of a car wash on the two project-related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. C. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536: Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, car washes are a 089 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 6 permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed carwash will employ approximately 25 full and part-time employees with 7 persons on the largest shift for both the carwash and detail center. The facility will operate 7 days per week from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with customers staying in their vehicle during the car washing and drying process. Complimentary self-serve vacuums will be available upon exiting the carwash tunnel. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of one of the parcels that make up the project site from Low Medium (LM)/ Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, carwashes are a permitted land use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed car wash is compliant with each of the applicable development standards of the Development Code. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is suitable for a car wash land use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Subject to the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the establishment of the carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. D. Tree Removal Permit (DRC2019-00218 ): The project includes a request for the removal of 17 trees. An Arborist Report (Steve Anderson, Arborist) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the 17 onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal. The removed trees will be replaced by 42 new trees as part of the proposed project. E. Design Review Committee : The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on December 17, 2019. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised three design issues: 1) the use of 090 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 7 stone veneer on the east elevation of the carwash building; 2) the addition of stone veneer on the vacuum housing bases; and 3) the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures. The committee recommended that stone veneer be added to the east elevation of the carwash building and that stone veneer not be added to the bases of the vacuum housing bases. The committee was also accepting of the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures rather than real wood. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. The plans before the Planning Commission have been updated to reflect the recommendation s by the Design Review Committee. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the RC Family Resource Center on April 29, 2019. Owners of property located within 660 feet of the project site were notified and invited to attend the meeting. No property owners / residents attended the meeting. G. Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $6,374 or pay an in-lieu fee to the City’s public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy. H. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with Senate Bill 18 (SB18 ), notification was sent on October 16 , 2018, to tribal communities from a list of seven tribes provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians) and requested any cultural studies that were prepared for the studies. The studies were forwarded to the two tribes and no further comment was received. Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on April 1, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by MIG, Inc and was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential impacts to migratory birds, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, and reduce noise impacts during the project's construction, as well as potential impacts that may be created upon operation of the development, such as traffic-related impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments 091 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 8 were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $4,862 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one -time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement) by redeveloping two underutilized parcels of land. The project is also consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed car wash will complement the approved reestablishment of the existing service station to the west and is designed to minimize any impact on the surrounding land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Design Review and Conditional Use Permit for the proposed carwash as presented and recommend City Council approval of the related General Plan land use/ Zoning Map amendments. 2. Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed General Plan land use and Zoning Map amendments along with the related entitlements based on the determination that redesignating a residential property to commercial at this location is not consistent with the City’s land use goals pursuant to the General Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on February 3, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (143 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on February 2, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans 092 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit C - Business Operation Letter Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Comments (December 17, 2019) and Action Agenda Exhibit E - Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan Draft Resolution 21-15 Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 Draft Resolution 21-16 Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 Draft Resolution 21-14 of Approval for Design Review DRC2018-00535 Draft Resolution 21-12 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 Draft Resolution 21-13 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 093 Exhibit A 094 Exhibit B 095 096 097 098 099 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 Exhibit C 108 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The “L” shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located to the west of the project site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved a project to reactivate this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and zoning map amendments (DRC2015-00684), changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-02; Exhibit D 109 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 2 Staff Summary and Design Review Committee Responsibility: In addition to the entitlement requests for a Design Review, the subject application also includes requests for a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment in order to alter land-use policy to accommodate the proposed use. Zoning map amendments and general plan amendments are legislative actions that establish City policy and require City Council review. These high-level legislative actions are typically intended to achieve some type of substantial public benefit. Generally, staff is not able to identify any such substantial public benefit which justifies a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment for this project. Staffs overriding concern with the project is thus whether the carwash land use is appropriate for the proposed location. The development review process, though, places the DRC review of the onsite structures prior to Planning Commission review of the higher-level land use policy issues. The DRC is, therefore, being asked to review the design of a project for which staff is unable to support the related entitlements. Consequently, subsequent reports to the Planning Commission and City Council will provide a thorough analysis of the appropriateness of the zoning map amendment and the general plan amendment. Along with the above-outlined concerns related to the land-use changes, staff has also identified a number of project-related technical deficiencies. Development Code Section 17.90.030 provides the Planning Commission with the flexibility to permit deviations from these provisions through the development review process or through the approval of Variances. As such, the DRC is not expected to offer recommendations based on staff’s concerns regarding the proposed zoning map amendment/general plan amendment or technical deficiencies. Rather, the DRC is being requested to review the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the full Planning Commission for consideration of each of the project entitlements and the outstanding technical issues. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a car wash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,865 square automated “express” car wash, a separate 1,428 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The first floor of the car wash building is comprised of an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 rollup service doors, office area, and restroom. The existing single-family residence noted above will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The car detailing center will be a separate service from the automated car wash. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be located in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 13 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible parking stall. Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 45 parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the car 2 – Not in operation but approved for reactivation 110 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 3 wash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The car wash and car detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of- way. Staff Comments: Staff has identified the following design issues that the applicant should address prior to the project moving forward to the Planning Commission for full review of the project: 1. The west elevation (front) of the car wash building includes a stone veneer on the tower elements. The east elevation (rear) includes similar tower elements without the use of the stone veneer. It is recommended that the east building elevation be updated to include stone veneer on each of the tower elements along with a similar gable treatment as that used on the west elevation. The City has a policy requiring 360-degree architecture carrying architectural details to all elevations. 2. Update the supports of the vacuum shade canopies to include a stone veneer base to carry over the stone veneer used on the on-site buildings. 3. The overhead lattice arbors and the lattice cover over the trash enclosures are currently called out to be constructed of “alumawood,” which is not appropriate for a commercial development. It is recommended that the “alumawood” be replaced with wood. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Design Issues – Visual enhancement of the rear side of the main car wash building, stone veneer bases on the vacuum canopies and the use of wood rather than “alumawood” for the overhead trellises. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 111 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 4 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the on-site buildings. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee consider the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the Planning Commission for review of the overall project and the related entitlements. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Michael Smith 112 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 1 of 3 A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams x Tony M. Guglielmo Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca x Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 – SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY- A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building 113 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 2 of 3 on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00381 – KEN KANG – A request for site plan and architectural review for the reconstruction and expansion of a service station and convenience store located in the Mixed-Use (MU) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, at 8166 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0207-112-20 and 23. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00936. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018- 00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved with the Committee recommending that stone veneer be added to the carwash building tower elements on the east elevation. The Committee was also accepting of the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures rather than real wood and not requiring stone veneer to be added to the bases of the vacuum canopies. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. 114 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 3 of 3 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:45pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, December 12, 2019 at least seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. 115 December 9, 2020 To: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 From: Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst MIG, Inc 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92507 Subject: Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project Dear Mr. van der Zwaag: On Tuesday November 24, 2020, City staff met (via Zoom) with representatives of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (Project) located on two contiguous parcels at 9744 (Parcel 1) and 9760 (Parcel 2) Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). This Memorandum provides a brief Project background, details the proceedings of the November 24, 2020 meeting, and documents the direction given by the City pertaining to preparation of the Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed Project. In attendance at this meeting were: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Alan Smith, Project Applicant; Paige Gosney, Applicant’s Counsel; and Pam Steele, Bob Prasse, and Cameron Hile, MIG. The Project includes development of a new automated car wash building and a separate detail center building along with associated parking, landscaping, and car wash system appurtenances on Parcels 1 and 2. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Draft IS/MND that was prepared for the Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25, 2020 and ending August 12, 2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) and 9872 Arrow Route (Parcel 4) from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. As shown in the table below, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), Parcel 2 (0.85 acres), Parcel 3 (0.43 acres), and Parcel 4 (0.79 acres) currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4- 8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore, this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. Exhibit E 116 2 Parcel # 2 3 4 Existing Zoning (Low Medium) Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Proposed Zoning (Medium) Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units The purpose of the November 24, 2020 meeting with City staff was to discuss the redesignation of Parcels 3 and 4 and for the City to provide direction on how best to implement this change for the CEQA review. The City directed the applicant to generate a Final IS/MND to include the additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4 in the Project Description and in discussions of the Project Description throughout the document. The City further indicated that there is no need to include additional analysis regarding Parcels 3 and 4 in the Final IS/MND or to recirculate the revised document for another public review period. The basis for this approach is that there is no specific development proposal for Parcels 3 and 4 at this time, and any such future proposal will be subject to a full environmental review in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA guidelines. The Final IS/MND, dated December 9, 2020 and included as an attachment to this memorandum, reflects the approach and direction provided by City staff as described above. The Final IS/MND shows revisions made to the Draft IS/MND with strikethrough for deleted text and underline for added text. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me at cameronh@migcom.com or call my cell phone at (626) 840-7719. Best Regards, Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst, MIG Inc. 117 3 Attachment 1 Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration 118 Arbor Express Car Wash Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Prepared for: Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite #106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 December 9, 2020 119 - This document is designed for double-sided printing - 120 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1  1.1 – Purpose of CEQA .................................................................................................................................. 1  1.2 – Project Background and Purpose of the Final IS/MND .......................................................................... 2  2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 4  2.1 – Project Title ............................................................................................................................................ 4  2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address .......................................................................................................... 4  2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number ...................................................................................................... 4  2.4 – Project Location ..................................................................................................................................... 4  2.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ................................................................................................... 4  2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation ...................................................................................................... 4  2.7 – Zoning District ........................................................................................................................................ 5  2.8 – Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 5  2.9 – Surrounding Land Uses ......................................................................................................................... 8  2.10 – Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................................ 9  2.11 – Required Approvals ............................................................................................................................... 9  2.12 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required ................................................................................ 9   3 Determination ........................................................................................................................................................... 21  3.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 21  3.2 – Determination ....................................................................................................................................... 21  4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 23  4.1 – Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................................ 23  4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources ........................................................................................................ 26  4.3 – Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 28  4.4 – Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................... 34  4.5 – Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 37  4.6 – Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 43  4.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................ 46  4.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................... 50  4.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 54  4.10 – Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................................................ 58  4.11 – Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................... 60  4.12 – Noise .................................................................................................................................................... 61  4.13 – Population and Housing ....................................................................................................................... 69  4.14 – Public Services .................................................................................................................................... 70  4.15 – Recreation ............................................................................................................................................ 72  4.16 – Transportation and Traffic .................................................................................................................... 73  4.17 – Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 83  4.18 – Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................................... 86  4.19 – Mandatory Findings of Significance ..................................................................................................... 90  5 Mitigation Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 93  6 References ............................................................................................................................................................... 99  6.1 – List of Preparers ................................................................................................................................... 99  6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted ................................................................................................. 99  6.3 – Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................... 100  121 Table of Contents Initial Study ii Appendices Appendix A Air Quality/GHG Modeling Data Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix D Roadway Construction Noise Modeling Data Appendix E Noise Study Appendix F Vibration Calculations Appendix G Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix H Infiltration Testing Report List of Tables Table 1 Residential Density Capacity ....................................................................................................................................... 5  Table 2 Construction Schedule ................................................................................................................................................. 8  Table 3 Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................................................................... 9  Table 4 RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 29  Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status .................................................................................................................. 29  Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) .................................................................................... 30  Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ...................................................................................................... 31  Table 8 Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day) ................................................................................ 32  Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................ 47  Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................ 48  Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory .................................................................................................... 48  Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements .................................................................................................... 63  Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels ...................................................................................................................... 63  Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Required ...................................................................................................... 64  Table 15 Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) ............................................................................................................. 66  Table 16 Operational Noise Levels (dBA) ............................................................................................................................... 66  Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ........................................................................................................ 67  Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria ................................................................................................... 67  Table 19 Construction Vibration Impacts ................................................................................................................................ 68  Table 20 Existing (2018) Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 75  Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary ........................................................................................................................... 76  Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions .................................................................. 77  Table 23 Opening Day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ............................................. 78  Table 24 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ..................................................................................................... 79  Table 25 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 79  List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map.............................................................................................................................................. 11  Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................................................. 13  Exhibit 3 Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................... 15  Exhibit 4 Floor Plans ............................................................................................................................................................... 17  Exhibit 5 Elevations ................................................................................................................................................................ 19  122 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 1 1 Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) received an application for Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit from Southwest Design Group (Project Proponent) for the construction and operation of an automated car wash and detail center (Project) on a 1.36-acre site consisting of two parcels in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to one of the two parcels on which the car wash will be developed in order to bring the site into compliance with the Zoning Code. The application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels to the east of the Project site to provide higher housing density. The approval of the application of the car wash development as well as the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change constitutes a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et. seq.). This Initial Study was prepared to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental impacts that could result from the Project. This report was prepared to comply with CEQA Guidelines § 15063, which sets forth the required contents of an Initial Study. These include:  A description of the Project, including the location of the Project (See Section 2);  Identification of the environmental setting (See Section 2.11);  Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries (See Section 4);  Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any (See Section 4);  Examination of whether the Project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls (See Section 4.10); and  The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study (See Section 5). 1.1 – Purpose of CEQA CEQA § 21000 of the California Public Resources Code provides as follows: The Legislature finds and declares as follows: a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern. b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man. c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment of the natural resources of the state. d) The capacity of the environment is limited, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the government of the state take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds being reached. e) Every citizen has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. f) The interrelationship of policies and practices in the management of natural resources and waste disposal requires systematic and concerted efforts by public and private interests to enhance environmental quality and to control environmental pollution. g) It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state government which regulate activities of private individuals, corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. 123 Introduction 2 Initial Study The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to: h) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state. i) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise. j) Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man's activities, insure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities and examples of the major periods of California history. k) Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment, consistent with the provision of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions. l) Create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony to fulfill the social and economic requirements of present and future generations. m) Require governmental agencies at all levels to develop standards and procedures necessary to protect environmental quality. n) Require governmental agencies at all levels to consider qualitative factors as well as economic and technical factors and long-term benefits and costs, in addition to short-term benefits and costs and to consider alternatives to proposed actions affecting the environment. A concise statement of legislative policy, with respect to public agency consideration of Projects for some form of approval, is found in CEQA § 21002, quoted below: The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve Projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such Projects, and that the procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects. The Legislature further finds and declares that in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such Project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual Projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof. 1.2 – Project Background and Purpose of the Final IS/MND The Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the proposed Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25, 2020 and ending August 12, 2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) and 9872 Arrow Route (Parcel 4) from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units of that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Draft IS/MND included a Variance requesting a reduction in the required 20-foot setback from the adjacent residential land use and from the required 45-foot average landscape setback. The City has also requested the Project applicant remove the Variance from the Project and redesign the Site Plan so the setback from the proposed car wash building complies with the City’s Municipal Code standard of a minimum of 20 feet when adjacent to a residential use and so the Project includes the required 45-foot average landscape setback from Arrow Route. As such, the Project Site Plan was updated to shift the proposed car wash building further to the west to accommodate for a 20-foot setback with the residential use to the east. The Site Plan was also updated to include a 45-foot landscape setback. Finally, the proposed concrete block wall around the Project was changed from 8-feet to 6-feet tall. These changes are reflected in Exhibits 3 through 5 below and resulted in a reduction in the size of the proposed car wash building and detail center building, an increase in the amount of proposed 124 Introduction Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 3 landscaping, and a reduction in the proposed number of employee-customer parking stalls. These minor design changes will not result in any new or more severe environmental impacts than were previously analyzed in the Draft IS/MND that was circulated for public review and comment. 125 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 4 2 Project Description 2.1 – Project Title Arbor Express Car Wash 2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 909-477-2750 2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner 909-477-4316 2.4 – Project Location The Project site is located approximately 2.45 miles to the south of Interstate 210 (I-210), approximately 3.02 miles to the west of Interstate 15 (I-15), and approximately 2.18 miles to the north of Interstate 10 (I-10) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (See Exhibit 1, Regional Context Map). The Project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres located on the north side of Arrow Route, just east of Archibald Avenue (See Exhibit 2, Project Vicinity Map). Parcel 1 is located at 9744 Arrow Route (APN# 208-291-06 and Parcel 2 is located at 9760 Arrow Route (APN# 208-291-03). The Project Site will be developed with the proposed car wash development (See Section 2.8, below, for detailed Project description). As part of a gas station project that was recently approved by the City at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue (8477 Archibald Avenue), Parcel 1 has previously undergone a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. Parcel 2 will undergo an identical change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial as part of the Project. Two additional parcels (Parcel 3 and Parcel 4), located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route (APN# 0208-291-02 & 0208-291-01) will undergo a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. However, no physical changes to Parcel 3 or Parcel 4 are proposed.  Latitude 34° 5’ 58.85” North, Longitude 117° 35’ 32.14” West 2.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite #106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential 126 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 5 2.7 – Zoning District Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) 2.8 – Project Description As previously described, the Project is comprised of two adjacent parcels along Arrow Route east of Archibald Avenue. Parcels 1 and 2 encompass approximately 1.36 acres, or 59,297 square feet. Parcel 1 is undeveloped while Parcel 2 contains an occupied single-family home. The single-family residence on Parcel 2 is currently used as a rental unit and will be demolished as part of the Project. As previously mentioned, Parcel 1 is currently zoned for General Commercial use as a result of a previously approved gas station Project. Parcel 2 is currently zoned for Low Medium Density Residential. As such, the Project includes a similar General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. This would bring the entire Project site into conformance for commercial uses in order to allow for the car wash use. The car wash development includes the construction of an automated express car wash building, a detail center building, shaded vacuum canopies/stalls, and associated parking and landscaping on Parcels 1 and 2 (See Exhibit 3, Site Plan). The 5,078-square foot car wash structure will have two floors (See Exhibit 4, Floor Plan). The first floor will include an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, enclosed area for mechanical equipment, restrooms, office space, cashier space, and storage space. The second floor will include an equipment room, an office and restrooms. The detail center building will be 1,296 square feet and consist of a single floor. The detail center will be used for auto detailing, which will be a separate service from the automated car wash and will contain restrooms and an office. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be included in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 8 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible parking stall. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) to General Commercial would result in the redesignation of land for residential uses to commercial uses. The redesignation of Parcel 2, which is 0.85 acres in area, would subsequently result in the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units. As previously mentioned, the Project application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4, which are 0.43 and 0.79 acres in area, respectively. As shown in Table 1, Residential Density Capacity, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), Parcel 2 (0.85 acres), Parcel 3 (0.43 acres), and Parcel 4 (0.79 acres) currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial, and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4-8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore, this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. Table 1 Residential Density Capacity Parcel # 2 3 4 Existing Zoning (Low Medium) Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Proposed Zoning (Medium) Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units 127 Project Description 6 Initial Study Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common-approach driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This will be a shared driveway with the parcel to the west of the Project site on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, which is currently being developed with a gas station. Upon entering the site, three lanes are provided for cars to line up at three automated cashier pay stations with barrier gate arms to pay for their wash and wait their turn. The automated barrier gate arms would allow one vehicle through the car wash tunnel at a time. Upon exiting the car wash tunnel, cars will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. To exit the site, cars would continue on the one-way lane and loop back out to the driveway onto Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route. The Project will also include LED site and building lighting as well as solar roof panels. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area (see Exhibit 5, Elevations). The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building. Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “Alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Express Car Wash System The express car wash will include a New Wave Industries, Inc. PurClean Spot Free Rinse System and PurWater Water Recovery System. The PurWater Reclaim System consists of two primary components: the underground reclaim tank(s) and the above ground PurWater unit. The below ground tanks are normally supplied by a local concrete vault vendor, with their capacity and lay-out per PurWater specifications. The primary purpose of the reclaim system is to provide quality water to the wash so that the water can be re-used within the wash and still provide a clean car. The re-use of the water allows the operator to minimize the amount of incoming fresh water to the wash and the amount that is discharged from the wash to the municipal sewer system. The reclaim system is not designed to meet a specific effluent quality of the discharge, although in many cases the water discharged from the system goes directly to sewer or a leach field. However, the system will allow for up to 86% water recycling, which will limit the amount of discharge into the municipal system at any given time. In addition, all cleaning products proposed to be used during operation of the Project would be biodegradable and environmentally friendly.   As the primary purpose of the PurWater Reclaim System is to provide quality water for re-use within the wash, the system is designed to separate settleable solids (typically sand, grit) and free hydrocarbons, from fat oil and greases, from the water going to the wash. These solids and oils can affect the wash quality, and increase the maintenance on wash pumps, piping, and nozzles. The large settleable solids (60-70 micron and larger) are settled within the underground tanks prior to entering the above ground PurWater unit. The PurWater unit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be retreated or go out with the effluent. The free oils (60-70 micron and larger) float to the surface within the underground tanks and are trapped within the tanks. Accumulated settleable solids and free oils are periodically (normally every 3- 6 months) removed from the reclaim system by pumping out the underground tanks and replacing with fresh water. Some amount of water is continuously discharged from the reclaim system in order to satisfy the water balance for the wash. The volume of discharge is dependent on the amount of fresh water used by the wash, less any water that is lost to evaporation and carry-out. Depending upon local municipal requirements, the discharge can be sent directly to sewer or to a leach field or may require additional treatment before final discharge. As each municipality will have its own discharge requirements, it is important to understand what contaminants the PurWater Reclaim System can and cannot affect. The PurWater Reclaim system uses two processes to reduce contaminant loading. The first is physical separation using centrifugal force (the cyclones) and gravity settling (the reclaim tanks). Physical separation will directly affect the amount of 128 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 7 free oil & grease (FOG) and total suspended solids (TSS) left in the discharge water, and indirectly affect the BOD / COD level as it removes oil & grease. The second process is chemical, oxidation using ozone. Ozone will affect the bacterial count, BOD/ COD, total suspended solids (primarily bacterial), and some dissolved oils and chemicals. From field testing and experience, the PurWater Reclaim system has been shown to produce effluent qualities as follows: TSS, FOG, and BOD are typically the main concerns by municipalities receiving an effluent from a car wash. Given the type of processes used by the PurWater Reclaim system, there is no effect on total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, or temperature. There may also be little to no effect on certain chemicals dissolved in the water, emulsified or dissolved oils, and non-settleable solids. No heavy metals are used in the process so the PurWater system will not add or impact existing heavy metals. The above effluent qualities are going to be similar for other types of systems that incorporate physical separation (plate separators, screen / bag filters, media filters, etc.) and chemical oxidation. Biological processes, when operating properly, may produce lower TSS, FOG, and BOD levels than the above, but still will not affect dissolved minerals and some dissolved chemicals in the water. The above effluent quality estimates are based on normal contaminant loadings seen by car washes. The estimates are not a guarantee of performance. The estimated discharge quality from the PurWater Reclaim System may or may not be acceptable for direct discharge to sewer or a leach field. Local authorities and municipalities should be consulted to determine whether additional treatment is required to meet discharge permits. The second component of the reclaim system is the above ground treatment system, which further removes solids from the reclaim water so that it is acceptable for the high- pressure pumps and nozzles within the wash. The PurWater reclaim unit has a suction pump that brings water up from the reclaim tank to be treated. The pump speed is controlled by a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) to either continuously recirculate water (low speed) or to provide water to the wash (high speed). Several pump speeds can be programmed into the VFD to meet various or multiple demands. The PurWater unit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The cyclones create nearly 1000 G’s of centrifugal force to obtain this fine particle separation. The treated (cleaned) water is sent to the wash and / or back to the reclaim tank as part of its continual recirculation mode. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be re-treated or go out with the effluent. The above ground reclaim system also has the function of providing odor control for the reclaim water. Reclaim water is a great environment for growing bacteria which can create plugging and odor problems. Typically, anaerobic bacteria (bacteria that grow in the absence of oxygen) will grow beneath the settled solids in the reclaim water tank. This type of bacteria produces hydrogen sulfide which produces an odor similar to rotten eggs. To control this bacterial growth, the PurWater reclaim system continuously recirculates water through the tanks to keep the water moving so that it does not go septic. The PurWater system also incorporates one of three odor control devices to further keep the bacterial growth in check. The first method uses an Air Sparger, which brings in air as the recirculation water passes through it. This puts oxygen in the water stream and helps control the anaerobic bacteria. The second method adds an enzyme into the recirculation water, plus uses the Air Sparger. The enzyme breaks down the dissolved organic material in the water, which takes away the bacteria’s food source to keep their population controlled. The third method used is the addition of ozone, which is a powerful disinfectant similar to chlorine. The ozone kills the bacteria to provide a nearly-bacteria free water. Also, ozone oxidizes dyes in the water, so it will remove the color created by wash chemicals (i.e., triple foams). Stormwater Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route. The car wash development would consist of approximately 22,343 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 38% of the overall site total. A 20-foot landscaping setback will be included along the Project’s eastern boundary (between Parcel 2 and 3) and a 45-foot landscaping setback will be provided along the Project’s southern boundary. An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the Project’s southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping. These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment. In addition, the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. 129 Project Description 8 Initial Study Project Construction Details Default assumptions for construction phases were used, and construction of the proposed car wash is anticipated to take approximately four to six months to complete. Soil cut and fill will be balanced on site. Details about construction (e.g. start date, schedule, number of workers, number and type of equipment) are not available at this time; therefore, default construction details were used where necessary throughout the analysis. The proposed development will connect to existing water, sanitary sewer, electricity, and gas facilities. Water and sewer service are provided by the Cucamonga valley Water District. Electricit y would be provided by Southern California Edison and natural gas will be provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Utility undergrounding would be required. The start date for construction is not currently known as of the circulation of this document. As such, CalEEMod default settings for construction were utilized to provide an estimate of construction phasing, scheduling, equipment, etc. (See Appendix A). As shown in the CalEEMod output file in Appendix A of this document, construction was estimated to begin on January 1, 2020 and conclude June 10, 2020 for an approximately 6-month construction length. As shown in Table 2, Construction Schedule, construction will include a demolition phase, site preparation phase, grading phase, building construction phase, paving phase, and architectural coating phase. Demolition activities will include use of concrete saws, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Site Preparation activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Grading activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Building Construction activities will include use of a crane, forklifts, generator sets, tractor/loaders, and welders. Paving activities will include use of cement and mortar mixers, pavers, rollers, and tractor/loaders. Architectural Coating activities will include use of air compressors. Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. The number of construction workers is not known at this time. Table 2 Construction Schedule Construction Phase Start Date End Date No. Days Construction Equipment Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 1 Concrete Saw, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader, Water Truck Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 3 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader, Water Truck Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 100 Crane, Forklift, Generator Set, Tractor/Loader, Welder Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 Cement Mixer, Paver, Roller, Tractor/Loader Architectural Coatings 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 Air Compressor 2.9 – Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. A gas station project is currently under construction immediately to the west of the Project site at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. To the west of the gas station, on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue is vacant land designated for office professional uses. Immediately to the east of the Project site are single-family homes. To the south of the Project site, on the south side of Arrow Route, is a strip-mall retail center with various businesses. Surrounding uses are summarized in Table 3, Surrounding Land Uses. 130 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 9 Table 3 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Zoning District Existing Land Use Project Site Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 1: Vacant Land Parcel 2: Single Family Home North Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Mulberry Early Education Center South General Commercial/ Low Medium Residential General Commercial (GC)/ Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) Strip Mall/ Single Family Homes East Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Single Family Home West General Commercial/ Office General Commercial (GC)/ Office Professional (OP) Gas Station Under Construction/ Vacant Land 2.10 – Environmental Setting The Project is located on two parcels (one vacant) in a developed area in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Project site is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and the area is built-out and urbanized. Disturbed non-native vegetation and limited pavement is located on the site. The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, vacant land and residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level (AMSL).  The site contains a local landmark known as the Beverly Hills House. The Beverly Hills House includes limited historic landscaping in the immediate vicinity of the structure.  The site does not contain scenic resources.  The site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes.  On-site vegetation consists of disturbed non-native vegetation and pavement and does not provide suitable habitat for any sensitive, or special status species.  There are no on-site water features indicative of potential riparian habitat or wetlands. 2.11 – Required Approvals The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the only land use authority for this Project requiring the following approvals:  Conditional Use Permit  Design Review  General Plan Amendment  Zone Change 2.12 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required None 131 Project Description 10 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 132 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 11 Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map 133 Project Description 12 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 134 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 13 Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map 135 Project Description 14 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 136 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 15 Exhibit 3 Site Plan 137 Project Description 16 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 138 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 17 Exhibit 4 Floor Plans 139 Project Description 18 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 140 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 19 Exhibit 5 Elevations 141 Project Description 20 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 142 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 21 3 Determination 3.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a ‘Potentially Significant Impact’ as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. □ Aesthetics □ Agriculture Resources □ Air Quality □ Biological Resources □ Cultural Resources □ Geology /Soils □ Greenhouse Gas Emissions □ Hazards & Hazardous Materials □ Hydrology / Water Quality □ Land Use / Planning □ Mineral Resources □ Noise □ Population / Housing □ Public Services □ Recreation □ Transportation/Traffic □ Tribal Cultural Resources □ Utilities / Service Systems □ Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.2 – Determination □ I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. □ I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. □ I find that the Project MAY have a ‘potentially significant impact’ or ‘potentially significant unless mitigated’ impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. □ I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required. Name: Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Date 143 Determination 22 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 144 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 23 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.1 – Aesthetics Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? □ □ □ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within view from a state scenic highway? □ □ □ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? □ □ □ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? □ □ □ A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020. The report is attached as Appendix B. a) No Impact. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two ways. First, a structure may be constructed that blocks the view of a vista. Second, the vista itself may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Managing Land Use, Community Design and Historic Resources chapter, the primary scenic resources within the City include the San Gabriel Mountains and the foothills.1 The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level. The Project is located on two adjacent parcels (one undeveloped parcel and one parcel with an occupied single-family home), within a fully urbanized area, visually dominated by commercial uses, residential uses, and surface streets. This site is not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista.2 Compliance with Municipal Code guidelines and regulations restricting height would ensure that views of scenic resources, including views of the San Bernardino Mountains to the north, would be preserved through standard height restrictions. Views of the surrounding hillsides from the Project site are obstructed by existing development and landscaping and are limited. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point, which complies with the City’s Zoning Code (Section 17.36.030) restrictions for building height. The Project will include a 6-foot concrete wall between the car wash and the Beverly Hills House; however, this wall will not block existing views of scenic vistas to the north. Because the proposed development would not result in structures greater in height than currently exists in the vicinity, development of the Project and accessory landscaping elements would have no effect on a scenic vista. The Project Application also includes a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately east of the Project site located at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route. While the change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential would lead to a higher residential density capacity on the parcel, any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to scenic vistas at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City’s Municipal Code height restrictions for residential uses. As such, the Project would result in no direct or indirect impact with respect to view of a scenic vista. 145 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 24 Initial Study b) No Impact. The Project is located in an urbanized area and not adjacent to a designated state scenic highway or eligible state scenic highway as identified on the California Scenic Highway Mapping System.3 Additionally, as discussed in Section 4.1.c. below, the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, as construction and operation of the proposed Project would not result in any changes or damage to the Beverly House (Please also see discussion of vibration-related impacts in Section 4.1.2 (Noise) of this document). Because the Project is not located adjacent to a designated or eligible state scenic highway, and the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, no impact to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway or local scenic road would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Development of the Project could result in a significant impact if it resulted in substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Degradation of visual character or quality is defined by substantial changes to the existing site appearance through construction of structures such that they are poorly designed or conflict with the site’s existing surroundings. Construction of the proposed Project would result in short-term impacts to the existing visual character and quality of the area. Construction activities would require the use of equipment and storage of materials within the Project site. However, construction activities are temporary and would not result in any permanent visual impact. Upon Project completion, the Project would consist of one car wash facility that includes a car wash tunnel, office, restrooms, vacuum area, and parking. Access to the site will be provided via a shared 50-foot driveway on Arrow Route. The building heights will not exceed 24 feet at its highest point. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point, which complies with the City’s Zoning Code (Section 17.36.030) restrictions for building height. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building. Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “Alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Parcel 1 is undeveloped, while Parcel 2 contains a single-family residence. Project construction would result in demolition of the vacant single-family home. While no direct or indirect changes to the single-family residence located to the east of the site (the Beverly Hills House) would occur as a result of construction of the proposed Project, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial could alter the visual character of the Project site and its surroundings. According to the Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report, the residence directly to the east of the Project site, dubbed the Beverly Hills House, has been designated in the City’s Historic Landmarks Points of Interest as City Landmark #32. According to the report, the Beverly Hills House was constructed between 1927 and 1932, and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location. Evaluations performed during the Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed Project recommended the property as eligible for listing in the California Register; therefore, the Beverly Hills House is recommended a historical resource (i.e., significant) under CEQA. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property and no direct or indirect impacts from construction and operation of the car wash development would occur. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House in the future, they will take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property’s setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity, and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark. This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting. A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C). Therefore, the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact 146 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 25 on the building’s integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its circa 1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a substantial negative impact to the visual character of the site or its surroundings. The Project is adjacent to a gas station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, as well as strip-mall type commercial uses on the south side of Arrow Route, across from the proposed Project. Surrounding uses are generally one to two stories in height, which is similar to the proposed car wash building. The surrounding area is not visually distinct and does not portray a particular architectural theme or aesthetic. However, there is a historical theme relating to the region’s agricultural past, that the City encourages in proposed development projects. These themes have been incorporated into the proposed Project. Therefore, the car wash development would represent a new commercial feature within a primarily commercial area. Because of the commercial uses in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, the addition of the Project would provide a new architectural aesthetic in an area that is older in character and would not conflict with the existing character. With specified design features included, the car wash development and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial would have less than significant impacts on the visual character of the site and the surroundings. Additionally, any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to impacts to the visual character of the site and its surroundings at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan Design Guidelines for residential uses. Impacts will be less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. Excessive or inappropriately directed lighting can adversely impact night-time views by reducing the ability to see the night sky and stars. Glare can be caused from unshielded or misdirected lighting sources. Reflective surfaces (i.e., polished metal) can also cause glare. Impacts associated with glare range from simple nuisance to potentially dangerous situations (i.e., if glare is directed into the eyes of motorists). Sources of daytime glare are typically concentrated in commercial areas and are often associated with retail uses. Glare results from development and associated parking areas that contain reflective materials such as hi-efficiency window glass, highly polished surfaces, and expanses of pavement. There are lighting sources adjacent to this site, including free-standing street lights, light fixtures on buildings, and pole- mounted lights. The car wash development includes interior lighting and outdoor security lighting. Light spillover and glare would be avoided by requiring that light be designed to Project downward and prohibiting the creation of glare on adjacent properties per the requirements of Municipal Code Section 17.58.050.A-D (General Lighting Requirements). The Project also includes solar roof panels; however, solar roof panels are designed to absorb light and would not cause glare. Compliance with the Municipal Code standards for lighting and glare during construction and operation of the proposed Project would ensure that lighting and glare impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The potential aesthetic impacts related to views and aesthetics are generally site specific. As discussed above, Project-related impacts would be less than significant. Lighting and sources of glare, while not always site-specific, would be consistent with the majority of the surrounding urban area and would be used during similar hours as surrounding uses. While the Project plus cumulative development would change the appearance of the site and surrounding area, all development Projects would be expected to be conditioned to follow applicable local planning and design guidelines as specified in Section 17.58.050 of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, aesthetic impacts are not expected to be cumulatively considerable and no adverse impacts would occur. 147 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 26 Initial Study 4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? □ □ □ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? □ □ □ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? □ □ □ d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project would be located in a fully developed, urbanized area that does not contain agriculture or forest uses. The Important Farmland in California (2014) prepared by the Department of Conservation identifies the Project site as Urban and Built-Up Land and does not identify the Project site as being Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.4 Therefore, there would be no conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use as a result of construction of the proposed Project. No impact would occur. b) No Impact. No Williamson Act contracts are active for the Project site.5 Therefore, there would be no conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. 148 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 27 c) No Impact. Public Resources Code § 12220(g) identifies forest land as land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. The Project site and surrounding properties are not currently being managed or used for forest land as identified in Public Resources Code § 12220(g). The Project site has already been disturbed by previous development and is surrounded by residential and commercial uses. Therefore, development of this Project would have no impact to any timberland zoning. d) No Impact. The Project site is partially developed, disturbed land with limited non-native vegetation; thus, there would be no loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non-forest use as a result of this Project. No impact would occur. e) No Impact. The Project site is a partially developed site within an urban environment. The Project is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and surface streets. None of the surrounding sites contains existing forest uses. Development of the proposed Project would not change the existing environment in a manner that would result in the conversion of forestland to a non-forest use. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact on agricultural and forestry resources. Development of the Project would not preclude or hinder existing or future agricultural operations in the surrounding area. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. 149 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 28 Initial Study 4.3 – Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? □ □ □ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or Projected air quality violation? □ □ □ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? □ □ □ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? □ □ □ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if the Project conflicts with or obstructs implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Conflicts and obstructions that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet attainment deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable air quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South Coast Air Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP.6 Consistency review is presented below: (1) The Project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, as demonstrated herein; therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standard violation. (2) The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant Projects. Significant Projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and off-shore drilling facilities. This Project is considered significant because it includes a General Plan Amendment. This Consistency Criterion refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP was designed to achieve attainment for all criteria air pollutants within the Basin while still accommodating growth in the region. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. Therefore, if the growth under the Project is consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by SCAG in the RTP/SCS, plan 150 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 29 implementation would be consistent with the AQMP, even if emissions could potentially exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily emissions thresholds. The proposed Project would result in the loss of one (1) single-family residential unit with a decrease of between two (2) and six (6) residents. The Project will also result in an increase of employees in the area by approximately three (3) to six (6) employees. The 2016 RTP/SCS population and employment projections for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as well as the decrease in population and increase in employment that would occur with the implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, are shown in Table 4 (RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions). Table 4 RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions Proposed Project Population Employment Arbor Car Wash and GPA/ZCA -2 to -6 3 to 6 RTC/SCS Growth 2012 - 2040 34,200 34,700 Within Growth Assumptions? Yes Yes Source: SCAG 2016.7 As shown in Table 4, the implementation of the proposed Project would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP. Impacts will be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. A project may have a significant impact if Project-related emissions would exceed federal, state, or regional standards or thresholds, or if Project-related emissions would substantially contribute to existing or Project air quality violations. The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, where efforts to attain state and federal air quality standards are governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Both the state of California (state) and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants (known as ‘criteria pollutants’). These pollutants include ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), inhalable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The state has also established AAQS for additional pollutants. The AAQS are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace within a reasonable margin of safety. Where the state and federal standards differ, California AAQS are more stringent than the national AAQS (except for Federal NO2 standards which are stricter). Air pollution levels are measured at monitoring stations located throughout the air basin. Areas that are in nonattainment with respect to federal or state AAQS are required to prepare plans and implement measures that will bring the region into attainment. Table 5, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status, summarizes the attainment status in the Project area for the criteria pollutants. Discussion of potential impacts related to short-term construction impacts and long-term area source and operational impacts are presented below. Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant Federal State O3 (1-hr) -- Nonattainment O3 (8-hr) Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Attainment Nonattainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Pb Nonattainment Attainment Source: ARB, 2020. See Appendix A. 151 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 30 Initial Study Construction Emissions Short-term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities related to development of the proposed car wash. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). To determine if construction of the Project could result in a significant air quality impact, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 has been utilized. CalEEMod defaults have generally been used as construction inputs into the model (see Appendix A), with modifications to the model described in detail below. The methodology for calculating emissions is included in the CalEEMod User Guide, freely available at http://www.caleemod.com. The “Automobile Care Center” land use category was used in the model to represent the proposed car wash and detail center, and a total of 7,292 square feet of floor area was included. A total of 39,254 square feet of the “Other Asphalt Surfaces” land use category was used in the model to account for on-site surface parking and the covered vacuum stalls. Finally, a total of 18,267 square feet of landscaping was also included in the model as “Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces”. Demolition of the single-family home on Parcel 2 would occur as a result of Project construction; therefore, a total of 1,912 square feet of demolition was included in the model. Soils imports and exports will balance on site. Construction activities are anticipated to start in January 2019 and be completed by summer 2019. As such, the first full operational year for the Project will be 2020. CalEEMod defaults for equipment needs were utilized. Based on the results of the model, maximum daily emissions from the construction of the car wash would not result in excessive emissions of criteria pollutants. As indicated in Table 6, Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs./day), emissions of criteria pollutants would not exceed SCAQMD daily construction thresholds. Impact would be less than significant. Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2019 17.01 25.40 16.01 0.03 3.82 2.19 Winter 2019 17.01 25.44 16.00 0.03 3.82 2.19 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. Operational Emissions Operation of the proposed car wash facility would result in long-term criteria air pollutant emissions. Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions, energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions would result from vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the proposed car wash. Area source emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products, and periodic repainting of the small structure. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas. The proposed car wash consists of one automated tunnel designed to reclaim and recycle water. According to the International Carwash Association, “self-serve” automatic car washes use approximately 30 gallons of freshwater per vehicle.8 As such, water use for the proposed car wash was estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle – though each individual vehicle washed would require more water, the Project Proponent estimates that the car wash would recycle up to 86% of all water used. As such, 30 gallons per vehicle is likely an overestimation for total water usage. Number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day, based on the Project proponent’s estimates of similar developments. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually, total water demand is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year. Because data are not widely available on energy consumption by the type of vacuums used at these types of facilities, the default energy use amounts were. CalEEMod was utilized to estimate mobile source emissions. Project trip generation rates were taken from the Project Traffic Impact Analysis, performed by Trames Solutions, Inc. in September 2018 (See Appendix G).9 CalEEMod also includes default outdoor water demand for landscape irrigation. Default inputs for all operational sources were used for the Project. Daily operational emissions as estimated by CalEEMod are summarized in Table 7, Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions. Operational emissions generated by operation of the car wash would not exceed the thresholds established by SCAQMD. Impacts will be less than significant. 152 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 31 Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Summer Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.24 5.70 14.55 0.05 3.72 1.03 Summer Total 1.43 5.76 14.61 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.20 5.81 13.91 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Total 1.39 5.87 13.97 0.05 3.72 1.03 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Potentially Significant? No No No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. c) Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative short-term, construction-related emissions from the Project will not contribute considerably to any potential cumulative air quality impact because short-term Project emissions will be less than significant and other concurrent construction Projects in the region will be required to implement standard air quality regulations and mitigation pursuant to State CEQA requirements, just as this Project has. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook identifies methodologies for analyzing long-term cumulative air quality impacts for criteria pollutants for which the Basin is nonattainment. These methodologies identify three performance standards that can be used to determine if long-term emissions will result in cumulative impacts. Essentially, these methodologies assess growth associated with a land use Project and are evaluated for consistency with regional Projections. These methodologies are outdated and are no longer recommended by SCAQMD. SCAQMD allows a project to be analyzed using the Projection method such that consistency with the AQMP will indicate that a project will not contribute considerably to cumulative air quality impacts. As discussed in AQMP Consistency, the Project is consistent with growth assumptions in the AQMP and would not exceed any applicable SCAQMD thresholds for short- and long-term emissions. Therefore, the Project will not contribute to any potential cumulative air quality impacts. d) Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are those segments of the population that are most susceptible to poor air quality such as children, the elderly, the sick, and athletes who perform outdoors. Land uses associated with sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed Project include residences to the east and the early childhood education center to the north of the site. Localized Significance Thresholds As part of SCAQMD’s environmental justice program, attention has recently been focusing more on the localized effects of air quality. Although the region may be in attainment for a particular criteria pollutant, localized emissions from construction activities coupled with ambient pollutant levels can cause localized increases in criteria pollutant that exceed national and/or State air quality standards. Construction LST’s Construction-related criteria pollutant emissions and potentially significant localized impacts from the proposed car wash were evaluated pursuant to the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. This methodology provides screening tables for one through five-acre Project scenarios, depending on the amount of site disturbance during a day using the Fact Sheet for equipment usage in CalEEMod.10 Daily oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions will occur during site preparation and grading activities on the site. Table 8, Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day), summarizes on- and off-site emissions as compared to the local 153 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 32 Initial Study thresholds established for Source Receptor Area (SRA) 32 (Northwest San Bernardino Valley). The car wash site is approximately 1.36-acres in size; therefore, the 1-acre threshold was used. A 25-meter receptor distance was used to reflect the proximity of the single-family home located just to the east of the Project site. This receptor is the closest to the Project site; therefore, would have the highest noise impacts. Table 8 Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day) Phase CO NOX PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 14.89 22.68 2.13 1.33 Site Preparation 7.89 19.48 3.73 2.17 Grading 6.61 16.04 3.01 1.82 Building Construction 13.49 15.98 0.92 0.88 Paving 8.90 9.17 0.52 0.48 Architectural Coating 1.84 1.84 0.13 0.13 Threshold 863 118 5 4 Potentially Substantial? No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. As shown in Table 7, emissions of NOX and CO will be greatest during demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction activities associated with the proposed car wash. Emissions of particulate matter will be greatest during site preparation and grading activities. It should be noted that the CalEEMod results summarized in Table 8 include application of SCAQMD Rule 403 and require the utilization of applicable best management practices to minimize fugitive dust emissions. A 50 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions is assumed based on rule requirements (while the Project Construction Noise Analysis states that water trucks would not be used during construction, such trucks will in fact be used to control fugitive dust during Project construction- See Section 4.12 for Noise Analysis). Based on CalEEMod calculations, and assuming that exposed areas will be watered two times daily during construction activities, localized emissions of criteria pollutants will not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds during construction of the proposed car wash. Impacts will be less than significant. Operation LST’s Operation-related LSTs become of concern when there are substantial on-site stationary sources such as smoke stacks or furnaces that could impact surrounding receptors. The Project does not include such on-site operations, and the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not permit such operations; therefore, impacts related to operational LSTs will not occur. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate State and Federal CO standards at intersections, even if the broader Basin is in attainment for Federal and State levels. The California Department of Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (Protocol) screening procedures have been utilized to determine if the Project could potentially result in a CO hotspot. Based on the recommendations of the Protocol, a screening analysis should be performed for the Project to determine if a detailed analysis will be required. The California Department of Transportation notes that because of the age of the assumptions used in the screening procedures and the obsolete nature of the modeling tools utilized to develop the screening procedures in the Protocol, they are no longer accepted. More recent screening procedures based on more current methodologies have been developed. The SCAQMD has not developed a screening threshold. The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) developed a screening threshold in 2011, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 31,600 vehicles per hour or more will require detailed analysis. In addition, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District developed a screening threshold in 2010, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 44,000 vehicles per hour would require detailed analysis. Additionally, a CMP Intersection refers to the intersection of two CMP roadways, of which both Arrow Highway and Archibald are considered CMP roadways.11 However, the Project’s operations would not generate 31,600 or 44,000 vehicle trips per hour. The Project would also not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where 154 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 33 vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway). Finally, the Project is consistent with the applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. Therefore, the Project passes the screening analysis and impacts are deemed less than significant. Based on the local analysis procedures, the Project would not result in a CO hotspot, and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e) Less than Significant Impact. According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturi ng uses that produce chemicals, paper, etc.). Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes, as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. The proposed Project does not include any of the above noted uses or processes. While short- term odors could be generated during construction as a result of activities like asphalt laying and application of architectural coatings, these impacts will be temporary and will cease upon Project completion. Less than significant impacts would occur. Cumulative Impacts No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The SCAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project’s individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the SCAQMD construction and/or operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact. As described in this section, the proposed car wash operational emissions would not exceed thresholds. Therefore, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts. 155 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 34 Initial Study 4.4 – Biological Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? □ □ □ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? □ □ □ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? □ □ □ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? □ □ □ 156 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 35 a) Less than Significant Impact. According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife BIOS viewer, a total of six sensitive wildlife species and no sensitive plant species were identified as occurring within the Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, within which the Project site is located.12 However, given the previously disturbed nature of the site and surrounding area, it is highly unlikely that any plant or wildlife species listed by the State and/or Federal government as endangered or threatened occur at the Project site. Based on site visits there is limited ornamental landscaping and trees on site; however, there is no identifiable natural habitat on site. Construction of the car wash will include replacement of existing ornamental landscaping with similar landscaping upon Project completion. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur with construction of the Project. b-c) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. According to the federal National Wetlands Inventory, the Project site does not contain any riparian habitat or wetlands and the Project would not disturb any offsite wetlands.13 There is no vegetation or on-site water features indicative of potential wetlands. No impact would occur. d) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The site is bounded by roadways to the west and south, a school to the north, and residential uses to the east, preventing the use of the Project site and surrounding area as a wildlife corridor. There are no substantial vegetated areas or waterbodies located onsite that could serve as habitat. However, there are a number of trees on the Project site that have the potential to provide habitat for nesting birds. Vegetation communities on the Project Site have the potential to provide nesting habitat for bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) Sections 3503 and 3513. There is potential for ground- and tree-nesting birds to establish nests on the Project Site prior to project construction. Destruction of, or disturbance to, an active nest is prohibited. Construction activities including site mobilization, tree removal other vegetation clearing activities, grubbing, grading, and noise/vibration from the operation of heavy equipment also has the potential to result in significant direct (i.e., death or physical harm) and/or indirect (i.e., nest abandonment) impacts to nesting birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). 157 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 36 Initial Study e) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The Project includes the removal of five trees. The proposed Project will comply with the provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.80, Tree Preservation), which prohibits the removal of a City tree by any person or entity other than the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no City trees on the Project site. Therefore, development of the proposed express car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. No impact will occur. f) No Impact. The Project site is not within any Habitat Conservation Plan area and no impacts would occur.14 Cumulative Impacts As discussed above, impacts related to Biological Resources are anticipated to be less than significant. Similar to the proposed car wash development, all cumulative Projects would be subject to individual project review and conformance with conservation plans and standard provisions for compliance with state and federal protection laws. Since Project- related impacts would be less than significant and because cumulative Project-related impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation, the cumulative impact from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would be expected to be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. 158 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 37 4.5 – Cultural Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? □ □ □ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? □ □ □ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? □ □ □ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? □ □ □ A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020 and provides the basis for the analysis in this Section. a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site encompasses approximately 1.36 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and a privately-owned residential property to the east. To the west of the site is a parcel currently being developed with a gas station. As discussed in the Historical Resources Evaluation, a cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project. The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the Project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the Project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the Project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). As such, it is not a recommended “historical resource” under CEQA and does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) is known as the Beverly Hills House. The Beverly Hills House was designated as City Landmark #32 in 1989. The listing criteria was requested and not available to the applicant. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore, the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e., significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” The Project includes demolition of the existing single-family home on Parcel 2, construction of an express car wash and detail center, and associated parking and landscaping improvements and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial on Parcel 2. The Project has been designed to include a 6-foot concrete-block wall and 20-foot setback to provide a buffer along the eastern and northern edges of the development. Construction of the car wash development will involve 159 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 38 Initial Study minimal ground disturbing activities. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. This change would not authorize any development on this parcel and, pursuant to CEQA, any future proposed development would be required to analyze potential impacts to historical resources at such time that an application is submitted to the City. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to review and approval by the City’s Historic Preservation Commission. No physical changes to the Beverly Hills House would occur with development of the car wash and there are no direct impacts to the Beverly Hills House from the car wash development. The Project will not result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the resource would be impaired. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since Project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House, they would take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. The Project proposes to construct an express carwash adjacent to the house at 9786 Arrow Route, “The Beverly Hills House.” The Project will take place on parcels adjacent to the Beverly Hills House property, and the house will be preserved in place. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property’s setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity, and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark. This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting. A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C). Therefore, the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact on the building’s integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its c1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a significant adverse to a historical resource. The proposed Project does not include any direct or indirect changes to the Beverly Hills House and is therefore preserving the house and property as they currently exist. According to the Historical Resources Evaluation, construction and operation of the express car wash development would not cause a substantial adverse change in the Beverly Hills House. There would be no direct impact on the resource; therefore, there would be no adverse impact. In the future should any physical changes be proposed for the Beverly Hills House, the City would require completion of an evaluation to determine eligibility for listing in the California Register. Any applicant(s) for future development at 9786 Arrow Route would be required to conduct a full historic resource impact analysis on the Beverly Hills House prior to receipt of demolition permits. The analysis would include the following: 1) a full California Register eligibility evaluation of the Beverly Hills House, 2) an analysis of direct and indirect construction and operation impacts of the proposed development on the Beverly Hills House, and 3) recommendations for mitigation measures, if necessary. If it is determined that the development would result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the Beverly Hills House, such that the significance of the resource would be impaired, the applicant would be required to implement the recommended mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the City’s Community Development Director and/or Historic Preservation Commission. Mitigation measures shall include, but not be limited to, data collection, preservation of the resource in place, or resource relocation. Should the property be determined to be eligible, a report would be prepared indicating options for mitigation in priority preference order of Preservation, Data Collection, and Resource Relocation. As such, the Project will have a less than significant impact. b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the cultural resources records search and field survey, findings for archaeological resources were negative. Given the urbanized nature of the Project vicinity, previously recorded archaeological resources are not anticipated to be uncovered during Project construction activities. However, formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. In addition, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 and GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant. 160 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 39 Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. 161 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 40 Initial Study c) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site consists of two previously disturbed parcels. One of the parcels is currently undeveloped (Parcel 1) and one contains a single-family residence (parcels 2). The Project will include demolition of the existing single-family home on parcel 2 and construction of an express car wash and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from residential to commercial on Parcel 2. Any buried paleontological resources would have already been uncovered or destroyed at the time of initial grading of the Project site. However, in the event that paleontological materials are uncovered, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4 are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to previously undiscovered paleontological resources and/or unique geological features that may be accidentally encountered during Project implementation to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that a paleontological sensitivity training for construction personnel be conducted before commencement of excavation activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 requires that a qualified paleontologist conduct periodic paleontological spot checks to determine if excavations have extended into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits as well as the presence of a paleontological monitor during all excavations into the local geologic formation or into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Mitigation Measure CUL-3 requires that ground-disturbing activities be halted or diverted away from the vicinity and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established if paleontological materials are encountered until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires that a professional paleontologist prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring efforts, methodology used, and the description of fossils collected and their significance. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4, impacts to paleontological resources will be less than significant as a result of construction of the proposed car wash. Mitigation Measures CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity 162 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 41 of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. No known human remains are anticipated to be located on or beneath the Project site. However, formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 to reduce impacts to previously undiscovered buried human remains. In addition, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains. In the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered the contractor is required to halt work in the immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Health and Safety Code § 7050.5, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a Native American, he/she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 and GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8, impacts to buried human remains will be less than significant. Mitigation Measure SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). 163 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 42 Initial Study GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation, the Project would result in no impacts to historical resources and less than significant impacts to known archaeological or paleontological resources and known human remains. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other Projects in the region is not likely since Projects would be subject to individual Project-level environmental review. Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect cultural resources and prevent significant impact to paleontological resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. 164 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 43 4.6 – Geology and Soils Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. □ □ □ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? □ □ □ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? □ □ □ iv) Landslides? □ □ □ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? □ □ □ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? □ □ □ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? □ □ □ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? □ □ □ a.i) Less than Significant Impact. Although the Project site is located in seismically active Southern California, the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.15 No active faults have been identified at the ground surface on the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant. 165 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 44 Initial Study a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an area of high regional seismicity. The Red Hill fault is approximately 3 miles northwest of the Project site and the Cucamonga fault is approximately 5.75 miles north of the Project site. Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the California Building Code (CBC). The 2016 California Building Code (California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Volume 2) contains seismic safety provisions with the aim of preventing building collapse during a design earthquake, so that occupants would be able to evacuate after the earthquake. A design earthquake is one with a two percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, or an average return period of 2,475 years. Adherence to these requirements will reduce the potential of the building from collapsing during an earthquake, thereby minimizing injury and loss of life. Although structures may be damaged during earthquakes, adherence to seismic design requirements will minimize damage to property within the structure because the structure is designed not to collapse. The CBC is intended to provide minimum requirements to prevent major structural failure and loss of life. Adherence to existing regulations will reduce the risk of loss, injury, and death; impacts due to strong ground shaking would be less than significant with construction of the proposed car wash. a.iii) Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction generally occurs as a “quicksand” type of ground failure caused by strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground shaking. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has not yet conducted seismic hazard mapping in the area of the Project site. The San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map does not include the Project site within a liquefaction susceptibility area; therefore, the subsurface conditions at the site are not considered to be conducive to liquefaction.16 Based on the mapping performed by San Bernardino County and the conditions encountered at the site, which have been discussed in detail in previous sections, adverse impacts due to the risk of liquefaction are less than significant. a.iv) No Impact. Landslides are mass movements of the ground that include rock falls, relatively shallow slumping and sliding of soil, and deeper rotational or transitional movement of soil or rock. The Project site is relatively flat and, according to the San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map, is not located within an area susceptible to landslides. Therefore, there would be no impact from landslides on the Project and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Topsoil is used to cover surface areas for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation due to its high concentrations of organic matter and microorganisms. Little native topsoil is likely to occur on the site because of previous development activities. Construction of the proposed Project would have the potential to expose surficial soils to wind and water erosion during construction activities. Wind erosion would be minimized through soil stabilization measures required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), such as daily watering. Water erosion would also be prevented through the City’s standard erosion control practices (Municipal Code Section 8.21.160) required pursuant to the California Building Code and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), such as silt fencing or berms. Following Project construction, the site would be covered completely by paving, the car wash structure, and landscaping. Impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. c) Less than Significant Impact. Impacts related to liquefaction and landslides are discussed above in Sections 4.6.a and 4.6.b. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The downslope movement is due to gravity and earthquake shaking combined. Such movement can occur on slope gradients of as little as one degree. Lateral spreading typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. Lateral spreading of the ground surface during a seismic activity usually occurs along the weak shear zones within a liquefiable soil layer and has been observed to generally take place toward a free face (i.e. retaining wall, slope, or channel) and to lesser extent on ground surfaces with a very gentle slope. Due to the absence of any channel within or near the Project site, and the subsurface soil conditions that are not conducive to liquefaction, the potential for lateral spread occurring on the Project site is considered to be negligible. As shown above, the Project site is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that has been identified as being unstable or having the potential to result on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, 166 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 45 liquefaction or collapse. The Project site is relatively flat and consists of non-native alluvial soils. The Project is required to be constructed in accordance with the CBC. Compliance with existing CBC regulations would limit hazard impacts arising from unstable soils to less than significant levels. Therefore, the Project would not likely result in landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse and no mitigation is required. d) Less than Significant Impact. It is unknown whether the Project would be located on expansive soils. In any case, the Project would be required to be in conformance with the California Building Code, City regulations, and other applicable standards. Conformance with standard engineering practices and adherence to design criteria would reduce impacts related to expansive soil potential to a less than significant level. e) No Impact. The Project proposes to connect to the existing municipal sewer system. The Project would connect to this system and would not require use of septic tanks. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential cumulative impact related to earth and geology is typically site-specific. The analysis herein determined that the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to landform modification, grading, or the destruction of a geologically significant landform or feature with implementation of mitigation. Moreover, existing State and local laws and regulations are in place to protect people and property from substantial adverse geological and soils effects, including fault rupture, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-induced ground failure (including liquefaction), and landslides. Existing laws and regulations also protect people and property from adverse effects related to soil erosion, expansive soils, loss of topsoil, development on an unstable geologic unit or soil type that could result in on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. These existing laws and regulations would render potentially adverse geological and soil effects of the Project to a level considered less than significant. Moreover, these existing laws and regulations ensure that past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region do not result in substantial adverse geological and soils effects. As a result, the existing legal and regulatory framework would ensure that the incremental geological and soils effects of the Project would not result in greater adverse cumulative effects when considered together with the effects of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region. The impacts of the Project-related to geology and soils would be less than cumulatively considerable. 167 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 46 Initial Study 4.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time.17 Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself (e.g., changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet’s surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the “greenhouse effect.” The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth’s surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re-radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 60° Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth’s temperature. Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities. Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. The County of San Bernardino adopted its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Plan) in 2011, which provides guidance on how to analyze GHG emissions and determine significance during the CEQA review of proposed development projects within the County of San Bernardino. The reduction strategies in the GHG Plan correspond to reduction measures. Measurable reductions in GHG emissions are achieved through adherence to the County’s DRP procedures. The County’s GHG DRP procedures, updated in 2015, are streamlined by 1) applying a uniform set of performance standards to all development project, and 2) utilizing Screening Tables to mitigate project GHG emissions. Projects have the option of preparing a project- specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate GHG emissions in lieu of the utilizing the Screening Tables. A review standard of 3,000 MT CO2e per year is used to identify projects that require the use of Screening Tables or a project-specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate project emissions. 168 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 47 Projects that exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e per year are required to either achieve a minimum 100 points per the Screening Tables or a 31% reduction over 2007 emissions levels. Consistent with CEQA guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. The car wash project will include activities that emit greenhouse gas emissions over the short- and long-term. While one Project could not be said to cause global climate change, individual Projects contribute cumulatively to greenhouse gas emissions that result in climate change. A greenhouse gas emissions inventory was prepared for the Project and is analyzed below. Short-Term Emissions The Project will result in short-term greenhouse gas emissions from activities associated with construction of the car wash. Construction assumptions for the proposed Project are discussed in Section 4.3 of this document. Greenhouse gas emissions will be released by equipment used for demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. GHG emissions will also result from worker and vendor trips to and from the site. Table 9, Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, summarizes the estimated yearly emissions from construction activities. Carbon dioxide emissions from construction equipment and worker/vendor trips were estimated utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 (see Appendix A). Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are continuous year after year until operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference, SCAQMD recommends in its draft threshold to amortize construction emissions over a 30- year operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be grouped with operational emissions in order to generate an approximate Project GHG inventory. Amortized car wash construction emissions are included in Table 9. Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction Year GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* 2019 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 TOTAL 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 AMORTIZED TOTAL^ 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 * MTCO2E Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding and variations in modeling software ^ Amortized over 30-years Long-Term Emissions The proposed car wash/detail center activities will result in continuous greenhouse gas emissions from mobile and operational sources. Mobile sources including vehicle trips to and from the development will result primarily in emissions of CO2 with minor emissions of CH4 and N2O. The most significant GHG emission from natural gas usage will be methane. Electricity usage by the Project and indirect usage of electricity for water and wastewater conveyance will result primarily in emissions of carbon dioxide. Disposal of solid waste will result in emissions of methane from the decomposition of waste at landfills coupled with CO2 emission from the handling and transport of solid waste. These sources combine to define the long-term greenhouse gas emissions for construction of the car wash. To determine long-term emissions, CalEEMod was used. The methodology utilized for each emissions source is based on the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures handbook.18 A summary of the car wash’s net long-term greenhouse gas emissions is included in Table 10, Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Mobile sources are based on annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) based on daily trip generation identified in the Project traffic report.19 Natural gas usage and electricity usage are based on default demand figures utilized in CalEEMod. Solid waste generation is also based on CalEEMod defaults. Emissions are presented as metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2E) meaning that all emissions have been weighted based on their Global Warming Potential (GWP) (a metric ton is equal to 1.102 US short tons). 169 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 48 Initial Study Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 36.23 0.00 0.00 36.38 Mobile 766.55 0.04 0.00 767.57 Solid Waste 5.65 0.33 0.00 14.01 Water/Wastewater 10.05 0.06 0.00 12.08 TOTAL 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 * MTCO2E/YR Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Table 11, Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, summarizes the yearly estimated greenhouse gas emissions from construction and operational sources. The total yearly carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for the car wash are estimated at 834.28 MTCO2E. This does not exceed the established GHG emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year. Impacts from the proposed car wash development will be less than significant. Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Source GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Construction 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 Operation 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 Total 834.28 Significance Threshold 3,000 Significant Impact? No * MTCO2E/YR Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding ^ Construction impacts amortized over 30-years b) Less than Significant Impact. As shown above, the Project would be consistent with the County of San Bernardino GHG Plan. Additionally, the Project’s consistency with AB 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 32 are discussed below. AB 32 Consistency. AB 32 was adopted in 2006 and requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are also consistent with AB 32 goal. The Project would generate GHG emissions, directly and indirectly, from a variety of sources. The CARB Scoping Plan includes strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32. These strategies serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Therefore, the Project would not conflict or otherwise interfere with implementation of AB 32. SB 32 Consistency. SB 32 was adopted in 2016 and requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 codifies the reduction target issued in Executive Order B-30-15. SB 32 builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an interim goal to achieving Executive Order S-3-05’s 2050 reduction goal of 80% below 1990 levels. 170 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 49 The CARB 2017 Scoping Plan identified reduction measures to achieve the SB 32 GHG reduction goal. Like the previously adopted Scoping Plans, the 2017 Scoping Plan includes statewide reduction measures that are implemented at the state level. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the 2017 Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Additionally, the 2014 Scoping Plan Update indicates "California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as required by AB 32"; and it recognizes the potential for California to "reduce emissions by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed in the developed world and to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050." Moreover, the Project does not propose facilities or operations that would substantively interfere with any future County- mandated, state-mandated, or federally-mandated regulations enacted or promulgated to legally require development to assist in meeting state-adopted GHG emissions reduction targets, including those established under Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-15, SB 32, or the 2017 Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with implementation of SB 32 or otherwise interfere with implementation of this or future goals. Cumulative Impacts GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective. As discussed above, the Project’s emissions would be below the County’s threshold for of 3,000 MT per year of CO2e for commercial projects and would not conflict with applicable plans. Thus, the Project’s cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be less than significant. 171 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 50 Initial Study 4.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? □ □ □ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? □ □ □ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? □ □ □ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? □ □ □ g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? □ □ □ 172 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 51 Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in a significant hazard to the public if it includes the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or places housing near a facility, which routinely transports, uses, or disposes of hazardous materials. The Project is located within a commercial and residential area and is bound by surface streets, commercial, uses and vacant land. The Project would not place housing near any hazardous materials facilities. The routine use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials is primarily associated with industrial uses, which require such materials for manufacturing operations or produce hazardous wastes as by-products of production applications. The Project includes an express car wash and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential on the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site and does not propose or facilitate any activity involving significant use, routine transport, or disposal of hazardous substances. Construction of the car wash would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents. Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products. Construction would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete. All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. With regard to Project operation, widely used hazardous materials common at commercial uses include paints and other solvents, cleaners, and pesticides. Operation of the proposed car wash would involve the use of cleaning solutions for daily operation and paints for routine maintenance and re-coating of structures. The remnants of these and other products are disposed of as household hazardous waste (HHW) that includes used dead batteries, electronic wastes, and other wastes that are prohibited or discouraged from being disposed of at local landfills. Through compliance with existing regulations, use of common household hazardous materials and their disposal does not present a substantial health risk to the community. Impacts associated with the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes would be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. According to the State Water Resources Control Board, there are no open cases of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) within one-quarter mile of the Project site.20 The property located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald that is scheduled to be developed with a gas station, is the site of a former gas station and a former LUST cleanup site. This case has been closed since 2001, and according to the Project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), performed by RGS Engineering Geology, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the site, is considered low (See Appendix C, Phase I ESA). There would be a less than significant impact related to the release of hazardous materials into the environment as a result of development of the proposed car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Construction of the Project would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents. Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products. Construction of the proposed express car wash would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete. All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in 173 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 52 Initial Study accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. Activities associated with the demolition of the existing single-family home may pose a hazard with regard to asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paints. ACM were used on a widespread basis in building construction prior to and into the 1980s; therefore, it is assumed that ACM is present on the Project site and will need to be handled following specific regulations/guidelines described below. Asbestos generally does not pose a threat when it remains intact. When asbestos is disturbed it becomes airborne. SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires work practices that limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and disturbance of ACM.21 This rule is designed to protect uses and persons adjacent to demolition or renovation activity from exposure to asbestos emissions. Rule 1403 requires a certified inspector to survey any facility being demolished or renovated for the presence of all friable and Class I and Class II non-friable ACM. The applicant must also notify SCAQMD of their intent to perform demolition or renovation of any buildings that may contain asbestos prior to demolition and requires that all ACM is removed prior to any demolition. Rule 1403 also establishes notification procedures, removal procedures, handling and clean-up procedures, storage, disposal, landfilling requirements, and warning label requirements, including HEPA filtration, the “glovebag” method, wetting, and some methods of dry removal that must be implemented when disturbing appreciable amounts of ACM (more than 100 square feet of surface area). All ACM shall be disposed of at a waste disposal site operated in accordance with Rule 1403. The applicant will also ensure the safety of construction workers involved in the ACM removal by complying with all California Asbestos Standards in Construction, including, but not limited to minimum air circulations, use of respirators, wetting of materials, clothing laundering, construction and demolition equipment requirements, and shielding specifications. Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 1403 would ensure that impacts related to the release of ACM are less than significant. Exposure of construction workers to lead-based paint during demolition activities is also of concern, similar to exposure to asbestos. Exposure of surrounding land uses to lead from demolition activities is generally not a concern because demolition activities do not result in appreciable emissions of lead.22 The primary emitters of lead are industrial processes. Any lead- based paint utilized on the exterior and interior of the existing single-family home would generally remain inside the structure or close to the exterior of the building and would be removed during demolition. Improper disposal of lead-based paint could contaminate soil and subsurface groundwater in and under landfills not properly equipped to handle hazardous levels of this material. Due to the age of the buildings it is assumed that lead-based paint is present. Therefore, 8 CCR Section 1532.1 (California Construction Safety Orders for Lead) must be followed for the demolition of all existing structures requiring exposure assessment and compliance measures to keep worker exposure below action levels. The Project is also subject to Title 22 requirements for the disposal of solid waste contaminated with excessive levels of lead. Testing, monitoring, containment, and disposal of lead-based materials will comply with all Cal/OSHA standards and regulations under California Construction Safety Orders for Lead section 1532. Adherence to standard regulation would ensure that impacts related to the release of lead based paints would be less than significant. With regard to operation, the proposed car wash would not involve the use of hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Project operation would involve the use of solvents, cleaners, and waxes used for typical car wash operations, and with compliance with existing regulations, would not pose a significant risk to the environment or humans. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. There is a special education school located approximately 200 feet to the north of the Project site (Mulberry Early Education Center). However, as mentioned above, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Impacts will be less than significant. 174 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 53 d) No Impact. The Project is not located on a site listed on the state Cortese List, a compilation of various sites throughout the state that have been compromised due to soil or groundwater contamination from past uses. 23 Based upon review of the Cortese List, the Project site is not:  listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC),24  listed as a leaking underground storage tank (LUFT) site by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),25  listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB,26  currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) as issued by the SWRCB,27 or  developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.28 No impact will occur in relation to hazardous materials sites. e-f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.29 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25- miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. g) Less than Significant Impact. Per state Fire and Building Codes, sufficient space will have to be provided around the buildings for emergency personnel and equipment access and emergency evacuation. All Project elements, including landscaping, would be sited with sufficient clearance from existing and proposed structures so as not to interfere with emergency access to and evacuation from the facility. The car wash will be required to comply with the California Fire Code as adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Chapter 15.04.010). The car wash site plan includes one ingress/egress access point via a 50-foot wide driveway on Arrow Route. The car wash driveway would be constructed to California Fire Code specifications and would allow emergency access and evacuation from the site. The Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan because no permanent public street or lane closures are proposed. Construction work in the street associated with the buildings would be limited to lateral utility connections would be limited to nominal potential traffic diversion. Project impacts would be less than significant. h) No Impact. The Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, as identified on the latest Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE).30 There are no wildland conditions in the urbanized area where the Project site is located. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The incremental effects of the Project related to hazards and hazardous materials, if any, are anticipated to be minimal, and any effects would be site-specific. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to hazards or hazardous materials that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to or from hazards or hazardous materials. 175 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 54 Initial Study 4.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? □ □ □ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? □ □ □ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? □ □ □ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? □ □ □ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? □ □ □ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? □ □ □ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? □ □ □ h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? □ □ □ 176 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 55 Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? □ □ □ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. A project normally would have an impact on surface water quality if discharges associated with the project would create pollution, contamination, or nuisance as defined in Water Code § 13050, or that cause regulatory standards to be violated as defined in the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control Plan for the receiving water body. For the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact could occur if the proposed Project would discharge water that does not meet the quality standards of the agencies that regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the Project does not comply with all applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to reduce potential water quality impacts during construction activity (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.190) and the implementation of post-construction best management practices (BMPs) such as detention basins, infiltration ponds, porous pavement, sand and organic filters, etc. (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.110). Construction Impacts Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth-moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. All new development Projects equal to one acre or more are subject to San Bernardino County NPDES Permit No. CAS618036. The car wash development would disturb approximately 1.36 acres of land and therefore will be subject to NPDES permit requirements during construction activities. In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared and submitted for the proposed Project. All construction projects must apply BMPs that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion. Compliance with City discharge requirements would ensure that construction of the Project would not violate any water quality standards or discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impacts would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. Operational Impacts An Infiltration Testing Report was prepared by Christopher Krall, P.G. of RGS Engineering Geology, dated September 12, 2018 (See Appendix H). The purpose of the testing was to determine the vertical infiltration rate of stormwater infiltration for the soil below the site in order to include the appropriate storage capacity for the proposed infiltration basin. Proposed construction will increase impervious areas on the Project site as the site currently consists of mostly impervious surfaces. The approximately 1.36-acre site will be replaced with a car wash structure, vacuum area, detail center, and associated paving and landscaping. Runoff from the developed site would result in increased potential water contamination from urban pollutants that are commonly found in surface parking lots, ornamental landscape planters and from atmospheric buildup on rooftops. Runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route. The Project would 177 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 56 Initial Study be subject to post-construction BMPs to address increases in impervious surfaces, methods to decrease incremental increases in off-site stormwater flows, and methods for decreasing pollutant loading in off-site discharges. A key design criterion is to treat the first ¾-inch rainstorm flows, since the first rains typically carry the most concentrated levels of pollution that have built up since the last storm. Common post-construction BMPs include retaining stormwater on-site to filter back into the groundwater. The car wash development would consist of approximately 15,607 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 26% of the overall site total. An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the car wash’s southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping. These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment. As previously mentioned, the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. Landscaped areas and on-site storm drainage facilities will collect stormwater to be conveyed to the bio swales for treatment, and then pumped to the City storm drainage system on Arrow Route. The proposed Project would not generate hazardous wastewater that would require any special waste discharge permits. All wastewater associated with the building’s interior plumbing system would be discharged into the local sewer system for treatment at the regional wastewater treatment plant. Although the amount of impervious surface would be greater than existing conditions, runoff would be captured on site and conveyed through a proposed on-site storm drainage system that includes water treatment at the site’s various bio swales prior to being discharged into the municipal storm drain at Arrow Route. Impacts associated with operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. b) Less than Significant Impact. If the Project removes an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduces runoff that results in groundwater recharge such that existing wells would no longer be able to operate, a potentially significant impact could occur. As described in the Infiltration Testing Report, groundwater was encountered in both exploratory trench excavations at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. In general, groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface. Project-related grading would only go a few feet below the surface and would not reach the depth of the groundwater table. No disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed building footprint and pavement area would increase impervious surface coverage on the site, thereby reducing the total amount of infiltration onsite. However, infiltration of irrigation water through soil and water from runoff through soft-bottom channels would ensure continued groundwater recharge in Rancho Cucamonga as impervious surfaces increase. The Project site is not utilized for groundwater recharge and will include landscaped areas that would serve as infiltration. Because this site is not managed for groundwater supplies and would provide landscaped areas for continued infiltration, this change in infiltration would not have a significant effect on groundwater table level. Impacts related to development of the proposed Project would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the Project results in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio swales and an infiltration basin for treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system in Arrow Route. Therefore, the drainage pattern would not be substantially altered in a manner that could cause increases in erosion off-site. Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be implemented during construction. At the completion of construction, the site would consist of impervious surfaces and would therefore not be prone to substantial erosion. No streams cross the Project site; thus, the Project would not alter any stream course. Impacts would be less than significant. d-e) Less than Significant Impact. No streams traverse the Project site; thus, the Project would not result in the alteration of any stream course. During construction, the Project applicant would be required to comply with drainage and runoff guidelines pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 19.20. With regard to Project operation, construction of the car wash would increase the net area of impermeable surfaces on the site; therefore, increased discharges to the City’s existing storm drain system would likely occur. As shown on the Project site plans, stormwater associated with the proposed Project would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio 178 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 57 swales for treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system at Arrow Route. Permits to connect to the existing storm drainage system would be obtained prior to construction. All drainage plans are subject to City review and approval. These requirements would apply to the proposed Project. Therefore, the increase in discharges would not impact local storm drain capacity. The Project is not an industrial use and therefore would not result in substantial pollutant loading such that treatment control BMPs would be required to protect downstream water quality. In addition, as mentioned above, runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Post-construction BMP’s, as described above, would ensure the Project would not result in substantial pollutant loading. Impacts related to the proposed Project Change would be less than significant. f) Less than Significant Impact. The Project does not propose any uses that could have the potential to otherwise degrade water quality beyond those issues discussed in Section 4.9 herein. Impacts would be less than significant. g & h) No Impact. According to flood maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood floodplain.31 No impact would occur. i) No Impact. According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Health and Safety Element, the Project site is not located within a dam inundation area.32 No impact would result. j) No Impact. The City is not exposed to tsunami hazards due to its inland location. In addition, no large water bodies that would pose potential for seiche are located in the Project area. The potential for mudflows is unlikely given the site’s distance from hillside and mountainous terrain. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential impacts related to hydrology and storm water runoff are typically site-specific BMPs are implemented at the project level. The analysis above determined that the implementation of the Project would not result in significant impacts. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact under most hydrology criteria, and therefore could not contribute toward a cumulative impact. In regard to Project impacts that would be considered less than significant, such impacts are not expected to result in compounded or increased impacts when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects, as other projects would be subject to similar laws and requirements regarding hydrology practices. 179 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 58 Initial Study 4.10 – Land Use and Planning Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? □ □ □ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? □ □ □ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and south, a school to the north, and residential uses to the east. The site is currently designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for General Commercial uses on Parcel 1, and Low Medium Density Residential on Parcel 2. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial, bringing the entire Project site under the same General Commercial designation. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. Therefore, the Project is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. The Project does not involve construction of any roadway, flood control channel, or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the community. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. Parcel 1 is designated as General Commercial in the City’s General Plan and is zoned (GC) General Commercial. However, Parcel 2 is designated as Low Medium Density Residential in the General Plan, and zoned (LM) Low Medium (4-8 du/ac) residential. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for Parcel 2 in order to make the site consistent. Section 17.34 (General Development Standards) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides general site development standards for commercial uses. The primary purpose of the General Commercial zone is to provide for general shopping with a variety of business, retail, personal, and related or similar services. The Project does not conflict with the intent or implementation of this designation as it allows for a variety of businesses and related services, of which a car wash and detail center would be. Furthermore, the Project would maintain the integrity of the commercial areas to the west and south in terms of density, use, and design. As previously mentioned, the Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The Project does not include any feature that would circumvent any mitigating policies in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. c) No Impact. As discussed in Section 4.4.f above, the Project site is not located within any habitat conservation plan or community conservation plan. Therefore, no impact will occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project does not conflict with any existing land use regulations and therefore could not contribute towards any cumulative impacts. The Project does not propose any new roadways or other significant infrastructure improvements that would restrict 180 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 59 access or require a diversion for existing travel routes. The Project does not result in an impact on any sensitive plant or animal species covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, nor does it hinder the implementation or establishing of such plans. For these reasons, the Project would not cumulatively contribute to land use conflicts and potential impacts are considered less than cumulative considerable. 181 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 60 Initial Study 4.11 – Mineral Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? □ □ □ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? □ □ □ a-b) No Impact. The Project site is located in an almost completely urbanized area characterized by residential and commercial development and some vacant land. The Project site is not shown in the City’s General Plan to be within an area defined by regionally significant aggregate resources and there are no mineral extractions or process facilities on or near the site.33 No mineral resources are known to exist within the vicinity. Impacts related to the proposed car wash and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to mineral resources that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Thus, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur. 182 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 61 4.12 – Noise Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? □ □ □ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? □ □ □ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? □ □ □ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ Roadway Construction Noise Modeling was performed and is included as Appendix D. A Project Operational Noise Assessment was prepared by Jeremy Louden, Principal, of Ldn Consulting, Inc. and dated August 28, 2019. A Project Construction Noise Assessment was also prepared by Mr. Louden, and is dated January 7, 2019. These reports are included as Appendix E, Noise Analyses.34 35 Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. Sound (and therefore noise) consists of energy waves that people receive and interpret. Sound pressure levels are described in logarithmic units of ratios of sound pressures to a reference pressure, squared. These units are called bels. In order to provide a finer description of sound, a bel is subdivided into ten decibels, abbreviated dB. To account for the range of sound that human hearing perceives, a modified scale is utilized known as the A- weighted decibel (dBA). Since decibels are logarithmic units, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by ordinary arithmetic means. For example, if one automobile produces a sound pressure level of 70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dBA. In fact, they would combine to produce 73 dBA. This same principle can be applied to other traffic quantities as well. In other words, doubling the traffic volume on a street or the speed 183 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 62 Initial Study of the traffic will increase the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. Conversely, halving the traffic volume or speed will reduce the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. A 3 dBA change in sound is the beginning at which humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound and a 5 dBA change is generally readily perceptible.36 Noise consists of pitch, loudness, and duration; therefore, a variety of methods for measuring noise have been developed. According to the California General Plan Guidelines for Noise Elements, the following are common metrics for measuring noise:37 LEQ (Equivalent Energy Noise Level): The sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over given sample periods. LEQ is typically computed over 1-, 8-, and 24-hour sample periods. CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00pm to 10:00pm and after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night from 10:00pm to 7:00am. LDN (Day-Night Average Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after the addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00pm and before 7:00am. CNEL and LDN are utilized for describing ambient noise levels because they account for all noise sources over an extended period of time and account for the heightened sensitivity of people to noise during the night. LEQ is better utilized for describing specific and consistent sources because of the shorter reference period. City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code The City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, under Section 17.66.050 – Noise Standards, provides the local government ordinance relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Operational Noise Standards Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. Construction Noise Restrictions To control noise associated with the construction of the proposed Project the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established permitted hours of operation and noise level limits. According to Section 17.66.050(D)(4)(a) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code the following activities are exempt from the provisions of the noise standards:  When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church or similar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided that noise levels created do not exceed the base noise level standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line.  When adjacent to a commercial or industrial use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday and Sunday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the standards of 70 dBA at the adjacent property line. Based on the nearby residential and school uses, the permitted hours of construction activity at the Project site shall be between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. In addition, the noise level standard of 65 dBA Leq shall apply to noise levels generated by Project construction at the nearby 184 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 63 land uses. If the Project demonstrates compliance with these standards, the construction noise level impacts are considered exempt from the noise standards. Existing Noise Environment Noise level measurements were conducted by Ldn Consulting between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on “slow” response and “A- weighting.” The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 12, Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements, provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Appendix E. Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements ID Location Description Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmin Lmax 1 Central of site at northern property line – set back from roadways. 63.4 37.1 90.8 Source: Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment. August 28, 2019. a, c, d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.66.050) sets allowable levels for residential and commercial land uses. Exterior noise exposure for residential use is allowable up to 60 dBA and for commercial uses is allowable up to 65 dBA. Construction Noise Levels As previously mentioned, short-term construction noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc. and presented in a Noise study dated January 7, 2018. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a rubber tire dozer, a backhoe, power tools, concrete mixers and paving machine that can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur from grading, building construction, and paving activities. This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken at similar sites and construction activities to describe the typical construction noise levels for each stage of Project construction. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 65 dBA Leq to in excess of 80 dBA Leq when measured at 50 feet. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA Leq per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA Leq measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receiver and would be further reduced to 68 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the source to the receiver. According to the project’s contractor, grading of the project will occur all in a single phase using a single rubber-tired dozer. No water truck will be required due to the size of the sight, access to a water supply line and the fact that the grading operations will only occur for 2-3 weeks. Trenching and underground earthwork will be completed using a single backhoe. Building construction will consist of concrete trucks and paving activities will utilize a paving machine. To determine the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Table 13, Construction Reference Noise Levels, provides a summary of the construction reference noise level measurements. Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels Noise Source Reference Distance from Source (Feet) Reference Noise Levels @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Reference Noise Levels @ 100 Feet (dBA Leq)5 Grading Activities1 50 73.5 67.5 Foundation Trenching2 50 68.2 62.2 Building Construction3 50 67.2 61.2 Paving Activities4 50 70.4 64.4 1 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 9/3/15 at a construction site located in the Ramona. 185 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 64 Initial Study 2 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 6/20/16 at a construction site located in Corona. 3 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 4/10/18 at a commercial construction site located in San Jacinto. 4 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 10/30/18 during roadway construction in San Diego. 5 Reference noise levels are calculated at 100 feet using a drop off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. The dozer will be moving along the property line and then moving away from the property line as needed to complete the finished site elevations. Therefore, the dozer would be adjacent to property line for only a short period of time and then moving away from that same location by at least 100-150 feet, in a loop or sweeping motion. The acoustical center of the activities, on an hourly basis, would be in between those two distances from the property line. An example of how the dozer would move around the site is provided in Figure 2 of the Construction Noise Assessment. Trenching, building construction and paving activities will also move around the site. Typically, the equipment will be more than 50 feet from the nearest sensitive receptors. To be conservative, and average distance of 50 feet was used to determine potential impacts. Utilizing the noise levels from Table 13 above, at an average distance of 50 feet, the construction noise levels from each phase would exceed the City’s 65 dBA hourly threshold. Table 14, Construction Noise Level Reductions Required, summarizes the maximum noise levels at each of the studied receivers. Therefore, inclusion of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is required to reduce temporary construction noise impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measure NOI-1 requires installation of temporary noise attenuation barriers will be installed along the northern and eastern property lines during the grading operations. It is recommended that the temporary barriers stay in place until all construction activities are completed. In addition, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 includes requirements for construction hours, combustion-engine equipment, equipment staging areas, equipment idling, loading and unloading of materials, public communication. These measures are discussed in more detail below Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Required Noise Source Reference Noise Levels @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Noise Reduction Needed to Achieve 65 Decibels (dBA)1 Resultant Noise Levels (dBA) Grading Activities1 73.5 -8.5 65 Foundation Trenching2 68.2 -3.2 65 Building Construction3 67.2 -2.2 65 Paving Activities4 70.4 -5.4 65 1 Temporary noise barrier needed to achieve additional reductions. Construction Noise Mitigation The Fresnel Diffraction Method was utilized for determining the relative noise reduction associated with a temporary wooden noise attenuation wall. The proposed noise attenuation wall would need to be 6-foot high and located at the property line to break the line of sight from the equipment at the adjacent property. The attenuation wall would reduce mid octave-band (250- Hz and 500-Hz) sound levels associated with typical construction activities between 8.5 dB and 10.1 dB. The reduction is dependent upon the source elevation and the topography between the source and receptor. The effective mitigated sound level at the nearest occupied residential area is therefore anticipated to be at or below 65 decibels (73.5 dB minus 8.5 dB) with the incorporation of the 6-foot high temporary noise attenuation barrier. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with inclusion of the temporary noise attenuation barrier and no further mitigation is required for the proposed grading activities. Mitigation Measures NOI-1: The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction:  Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, hay bales, or any other suitable material such that a minimum reduction 186 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 65 of 8.5 dBA is achieved at the nearest sensitive land use. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction:  Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays.  All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment.  The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction.  Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited.  The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site.  If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Operational Noise levels Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. As previously mentioned, long-term operational noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc., and presented in a Noise study dated August 28, 2019. A substantial increase in ambient noise is an increase that is barely perceptible (3 dBA). The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles along the eastern edge of Parcel 2. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system. The car wash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north. The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3 of the Operational Noise Assessment. The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The modeling includes a 6-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA (See Appendix E). Receptors used in the noise modeling (Figure 4 of the Noise Study) do not represent actual noise sensitive land uses. The receptor locations that were chosen for the analysis are located on the Project site and are for noise modeling purposes only. However, these receptor locations are located closer to the Project site than actual existing noise sensitive receptors located at the residential uses to the east and the elementary school to the north. Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SoundPLAN Essential, version 4.1, a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package (NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO 187 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 66 Initial Study Standard 9613-2, “Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data. The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impacts, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time due to the fact that wind patterns fluctuate. Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver. Acoustically hard sites include surfaces, such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off-site uses are considered acoustically soft, or absorptive, therefore, an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. Elevations were taken from the project plans. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 15, Operational Reference Noise Levels(dBA), below. Table 15 Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) Noise Source Number of Sources Reference Sound Power Level1 Car Wash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 4 80.0 1 Reference Noise Level provided in Operational Noise Assessment Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific modeled receptor locations are shown in Table 16, Operational Noise Levels (dBA), below. The results of the noise modeling along with the modeled receptor locations are shown in Figure 4 of the Operational Noise Analysis. As shown in Table 16, noise levels would not exceed the City’s standard of 65 dBA at the modeled receptor locations with incorporation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Because the nearest sensitive receptors are located further away than the modeled receptor locations, noise levels would be even lower at these locations due to distance attenuation. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at nearby sensitive land uses. Table 16 Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Modeled Receptor Location With Mitigation Measures R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 * Noise levels are hourly averages (Leq) Mitigation Measures NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. 188 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 67 b) Less than Significant Impact. Vibration is the movement of mass over time. It is described in terms of frequency and amplitude and unlike sound; there is no standard way of measuring and reporting amplitude. Vibration can be described in units of velocity (inches per second) or discussed in decibel (dB) units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Vibration impacts to buildings are generally discussed in terms of peak particle velocity (PPV) that describes particle movement over time (in terms of physical displacement of mass). For purposes of this analysis, PPV will be used to describe all vibration for ease of reading and comparison. Vibration can impact people, structures, and sensitive equipment.38 The primary concern related to vibration and people is the potential to annoy those working and residing in the area. Vibration with high enough amplitudes can damage structures (such as crack plaster or destroy windows). Groundborne vibration can also disrupt the use of sensitive medical and scientific instruments such as electron microscopes. Common sources of vibration within communities include construction activities and railroads. Operation of the Project does not include uses that cause vibration. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack hammering, and demolition-related activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration impacts if large bulldozers, large trucks, or other heavy equipment are used. The construction of the car wash would not require the use of equipment such as pile drivers, which are known to generate substantial construction vibration levels. According to the Caltrans vibration manual, large bulldozers, vibratory rollers (used to compact earth), and loaded trucks utilized during grading activities can produce vibration, and depending on the level of vibration, could cause annoyance at uses within the Project vicinity or damage structures. Caltrans has developed a screening tool to determine of vibration from construction equipment is substantial enough to impact surrounding uses. The Caltrans vibration manual establishes thresholds for vibration impacts on buildings and humans. These thresholds are summarized in Tables 17, Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria, and Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria. Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria Structural Integrity Maximum PPV (in/sec) Transient Continuous Historic and some older buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modern industrial and commercial structures 2.00 0.50 Source: Caltrans 2013 Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria Human Response PPV Threshold (in/sec) Transient Continuous Barely perceptible 0.035 0.012 Distinctly perceptible 0.24 0.035 Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10 Severely perceptible 2.00 0.40 Source: Caltrans 2013 Construction of the car wash would not require rock blasting, or pile driving, but could require use a vibratory roller, small bulldozer, loaded trucks, and jackhammer. Construction activities that use vibratory rollers and bulldozers are repetitive sources of vibration; therefore, the continuous threshold is used. Commercial and residential uses adjacent to the Project site are located to the north and east, respectively. As a worst-case scenario, the historic and some older buildings threshold is used. Based on the threshold criteria summarized in Tables 17 and 18, vibration from use of heavy construction equipment for the Project would be below the thresholds to cause damage to nearby structures at the receptors shown in Table 19, Construction Vibration Impacts. This includes the Beverly Hills House, which will not be directly or indirectly impacted by 189 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 68 Initial Study construction vibration. With regard to long-term operational impacts, activities associated with the car wash would not result in any excessive vibration-related impacts to adjacent or on-site properties. All of the receptors will experience barely perceptible vibration from the use of this equipment (See Appendix F, Vibration Calculations). Furthermore, pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, these construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Therefore, the Project would not result in excessive, strongly perceptible vibration. Impacts will be less than significant. Table 19 Construction Vibration Impacts Receptors Equipment PPVref Distance (feet)* PPV 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Vibratory Roller 0.21 82 0.0448 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 0.0136 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Large Bulldozer 0.089 82 0.0190 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 0.0058 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Small Bulldozer 0.003 82 0.0006 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 0.0002 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Loaded Truck 0.076 82 0.0162 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Loaded Truck 0.076 205 0.0049 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Jackhammer 0.035 82 0.0075 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Jackhammer 0.035 205 0.0023 Source: MIG 2018. See Appendix E. * Actual distance from center of Project site to receptor. e,f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.39 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25-miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative noise impacts would occur primarily as a result of increased traffic on local roadways due to buildout of the Project and other projects in the vicinity. A project’s contribution to a cumulative traffic noise increase would be considered significant when the combined effect exceeds perception level threshold. The combined effect compares the “cumulative with Project” condition to existing conditions. Although there may be a significant noise increase due to the Project in combination with other related projects (combined effects), it must also be demonstrated that the Project has an incremental effect. In other words, a significant portion of the noise increase must be due to the Project. The following criteria were utilized to evaluate the combined effect of the cumulative noise increase.  Combined Effect. The cumulative with Project noise level “Future With Project” would cause a significant cumulative impact if a 3.0 dB increase over existing condition occurs AND the resulting noise level exceeds the applicable exterior standard at a sensitive use.  Incremental Effect. The “Future With Project” causes a 1.0 dBA increase in noise over the “Future Without Project” noise level.  A significant impact would result only if both the combined and incremental effects criteria have been exceeded. As discussed in Section 4.12.a. above, the proposed Project would not exceed the applicable City exterior noise standard at nearby sensitive uses. Therefore, none of the roadway segments would exceed both the Combined Effect and Incremental Effect criteria because the Combined Effect criteria requires a project to result in noise levels that exceed the applicable exterior noise standard. Therefore, the Project in combination with cumulative background traffic noise levels would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. 190 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 69 4.13 – Population and Housing Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? □ □ □ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project would employ between three and six employees and would not induce population growth. No new expanded infrastructure is proposed that could accommodate additional growth in the area that is not already possible with existing infrastructure. No impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The single-family residence is currently used as a rental property and would be demolished in order to develop the car wash. There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of residential units necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Displacement, in the context of housing, can generally be defined as persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence.40 There is a single- family home located on the site that is currently used as a rental property by one family. There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to population or housing. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to population and housing that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. As a result, no cumulative impacts related to population and housing would occur. 191 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 70 Initial Study 4.14 – Public Services Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Fire protection? □ □ □ b) Police protection? □ □ □ c) Schools? □ □ □ d) Parks? □ □ □ e) Other public facilities? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) provides fire protection services for the City. The RCFPD employs over 120 full time and part time employees that serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50 square mile area. Fire, rescue, emergency medical and hazardous materials incidents are coordinated by an on-duty Battalion Chief supervising cross-trained firefighter/paramedics and firefighter/emergency medical technicians (EMTs) responding from seven fire stations. The RCFPD located closest to the Project site is Fire Station 172, located approximately 0.65 miles north of the Project site at 9612 San Bernardino Road. Development of the car wash as proposed by the Project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services. However, development would not increase to a substantial level considering the site’s location and surrounding area of similar uses, and incremental impacts would be offset with payment of Development Impact Fees. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Police protection services would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. The closest sheriff’s station is located at 10510 Civic Center Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 1.00 miles east of the Project site. Although a new car wash development would be constructed and operated on the Project site, the Project is in a currently developed area currently served by the County Sheriff’s Department. The Project is not anticipated to increase response times to the Project site or surrounding area. As required for a development of this type, the Project is subject to a law enforcement Development Impact Fee as imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project does not propose or require new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) No Impact. The Project is a non-residential land use. The Cucamonga School District will require development impact fees be paid by the applicant. With payment of the required fees, no significant impact to school services or facilities would occur and no mitigation is required. d) No Impact. The City has established park impact fees to offset the costs associated with increased maintenance and the addition of park facilities resulting from new development. The City’s park impact fees are generated based on the number of residential units in either subdivision or non-subdivision developments. The Project includes development of a car wash and 192 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 71 does not have a residential component. As such, the Project would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. e) Less than Significant Impact. The City requires that certain types of development pay impact fees to compensate for additional services provided by public facilities as a result of implementation of their project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires development impact fees for libraries and animal centers; however, the Project would not be subject to these impact fees as they are based on the number of residential units proposed by the development. The Project does not include residential uses and would not result in a direct increase in population within the City or surrounding area. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities would occur with Project implementation and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in a significant impact to any public services or facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to public services or facilities that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to public services or facilities. 193 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 72 Initial Study 4.15 – Recreation Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? □ □ □ b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project does not include development of any residences that could directly generate increased demand for parks and recreational facilities. Implementation of the Project would not generate an increase in demand on existing public or private parks or other recreational facilities that would either result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. Furthermore, as the Project does not include residential uses, the Project would not be subject to a park impact fee. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. b) No Impact. As previously addressed, the Project does not include residential development and would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. The Project does not include recreational facilities, nor would it require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in an increased use of recreational facilities or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no cumulative impacts on recreational facilities would result from Project implementation. 194 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 73 4.16 – Transportation and Traffic Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? □ □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? □ □ □ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? □ □ □ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? □ □ □ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? □ □ □ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? □ □ □ a) No Determination. A traffic impact study was prepared for the Project by Trames Solutions, dated March 20, 2019 (See Appendix G).41 According to the traffic impact study, the Project is estimated to generate 909 additional daily trips, with 50 AM peak hour trips and 89 PM peak hour trips. Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed Project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed Project. However, the following intersection improvements were recommended to address cumulative impacts during the peak hours: 195 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 74 Initial Study  Archibald/Arrow Route - Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an unacceptable level of service during the peak hour. Since the project does not directly cause a significant impact at this location, the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. Furthermore, the development on the northeast corner (DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width.  Malvern/Arrow Route - Install a channelized median at the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route to restrict northbound left turns. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $5,000. Since the project does not directly cause the need for this improvement, the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The traffic Study area was established in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff through the Scoping Letter Agreement process. The traffic study area includes four intersections as listed below: 1. Archibald Avenue/ Arrow Route 2. Malven Avenue/ Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Avenue/ Arrow Route 4. West Project Driveway (Car Wash)/ Arrow Route 5. East Project Driveway (Car Wash)/ Arrow Route Morning and evening peak hour traffic conditions were analyzed for the following scenarios:  Existing (2018) Traffic  Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative (ODAC 2019)  Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (ODACP 2019)  Horizon Year (2040) Without Project  Horizon Year (2040) With Project Future traffic analysis is based on a background (ambient) growth of 2% per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service (LOS) as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate LOS conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine LOS. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of LOS is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the LOS has been calculated. 196 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 75 The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. The LOS are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Significance Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established LOS “D” as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS “E” or “F” is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. However, pursuant to recent CEQA court case rulings, LOS is no longer considered a significant impact. As such, no impact determination has been made, and the findings of the LOS based traffic impact study prepared by Trames Solutions have been included in this section of the Initial Study Checklist for informational purposes. Existing Conditions (2018) Delay and Level of Service As shown in Table 20, Existing (2018) Conditions, the study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or betted) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls. Table 20 Existing (2018) Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 51.9 54.7 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 28.0 24.3 D C 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 37.4 27.5 D D 4. Project Driveway/Arrow Route -- -- -- -- -- Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2019 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination. Therefore, to account for these trips (termed “ambient growth”), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. To account for traffic not attributed to the project or 197 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 76 Initial Study other planned developments within the study area, linear growth between 2018 traffic volumes and San Bernardino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM) 2040 forecast has been utilized to estimate ambient growth for opening year (2019) conditions. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development. The land use category for an automated car wash facility (7,293 sf) with a 140-foot long car wash tunnel was used. The number of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation for a car wash facility. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the number of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 of the Traffic Study were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the Project are shown in Table 21, Project Trip Generation Summary. The proposed Project is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37%, PM-35%) and a 5% internal trip reduction (with the adjacent gas station) was assumed for the car wash. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The Project’s trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the Project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution patterns for the Project are illustrated on Figures 4-A and 4- B of the Project Traffic Study. Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use Quantity Peak Hour Daily AM PM In Out Total In Out Total Express Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -- -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -- -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 Car Wash Subtotal 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 Total Project Trips 29 21 50 40 48 89 909 Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash. 1711 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA TSF = thousand square feet Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination. Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project. A 5% reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37% and 35% were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. 198 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 77 Cumulative Traffic Trip Generation To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus Project traffic conditions, Project traffic was combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments that are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. The location of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study. According to the Project Traffic Study, cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. Other Approved or Proposed Development Project The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study and include the following projects:  DRC 20118-000119 (9000 Hellman Ave.) – 174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse  DRC 2013-00565 (NE of Archibald/7th) – 171,941 General Industrial  DRC 2017-00654 (SW of Haven/26th) – 207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail  DRC 2016-00695 (8th/Industrial) – 150,003 sf General Industrial  DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions Other Approved Project Trip Generation The cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-E through 4-I contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 22, Opening day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Conditions, below. As shown on Table 22, the study area intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls, except for the intersection of Archibald Ave./Arrow Route (#1). However, the improvement of widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 55.9 53.7 62.7 51.3 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 30.6 26.3 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 38.0 28.6 D C 199 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 78 Initial Study 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 13.7 13.4 B B 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route Future Intersection Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 23, Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions, below. As shown on Table 23, most study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route (#1) will continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service with existing geometry. However, the same improvement measure under ODAC conditions (widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). Table 23 Opening Day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 57.7 54.5 65.9 54.3 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 32.8 29.0 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 41.3 38.8 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 14.6 15.1 B C 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 14.0 13.6 B B Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 24, Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions, below. As shown on Table 24, the following study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls:  Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1)  Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1), the separate westbound right turn with overlap phasing improvement identified under ODAC conditions is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). For the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), restricting the northbound approach to right turns only is anticipated to improve the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). However, this improvement will shift the northbound traffic heading west on Arrow to instead, turn right and make a U-turn at Ramona Avenue. The peak hour operations at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route have been evaluated for 2040 conditions and are presented in Table 24. It should be noted however that the intersection of Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours even without and with the shifted northbound left turn volumes from 200 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 79 Malven Avenue. As shown in Table 24, restricting northbound left turns at Malven Avenue/Arrow Route (#2) and northbound/southbound left turns at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route (#3) during peak hours are anticipated improve both intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 24 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 70.3 54.2 56.8 53.6 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB left turn during peak hours CSS CSS 53.8 17.6 35.2 17.1 F C E C 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 46.6 45.5 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 15.2 13.9 C B 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route Future Intersection 6. Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB/SB left turns during peak hours CSS CSS >100 15.8 >100 16.1 F C F C Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 25, Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions, below. As shown on Table 25, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (#4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. As shown in Table 25, the improvements identified previously under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions are anticipated to improve the deficient intersections to operate at an acceptable level of (LOS “D” or better). Table 25 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 72.5 54.4 58.9 54.8 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB left during peak hours CSS CSS 60.4 18.1 40.4 17.7 F C E C 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 46.7 45.8 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 16.3 15.7 C C 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route - With Improvements CSS CSS 15.0 15.7 14.3 14.6 B C B B 6. Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB/SB left turns during peak hours CSS CSS >100 16.1 >100 16.5 F C F C Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service 201 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 80 Initial Study Findings For Existing (2018) conditions the study area intersections are operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls. For ODAC (2019) and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours. Providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2) are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours. For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1), providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), restricting the northbound approach to right turns only during the peak hours is anticipated to improve the intersection to acceptable LOS. This improvement will in turn affect Ramona Avenue at Arrow Route, and in order to mitigate the secondary effects, the same treatment will be required to be installed during the peak hours at the intersection of Ramona Avenue and Arrow Route. Because LOS is no longer considered a significant impact pursuant to CEQA, the Project is not required to incorporate mitigation measures that would alleviate the above-described impacts. The Project traffic impact study provides the following recommendations, again provided for informational purposes only: Recommendations 1. On-Site. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below:  Provide stop sign control at the project driveways.  Provide signage to restrict access to right turns in/out only to/from the project driveways.  On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project.  Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. 2. Off-Site. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below:  Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level of service during the peak hours. However, this location is projected to operate deficiently under ODAC and 2040 without and with project conditions. The improvements will be conditioned to be constructed by the project. Furthermore, the development on the northeast corner (DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/CStore/ Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width.  Install signs to restrict northbound left turns left turns during peak hours at both Malven Avenue and Ramona Avenue along Arrow Route during peak hours (7:00 – 9:00 AM and 4:00 – 6:00 PM). This impact will only be present for 2040 conditions and the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $500 per location. The project fair share percentages are as follows: 202 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 81 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 49 84 Existing Traffic 2,148 2,309 2040 Traffic 2,654 2,787 New Traffic 506 478 Project Percentage 9.7% (49/506) 17.6% (84/478) Dollar Amount $88 Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 54 79 Existing Traffic 2,171 2,280 2040 Traffic 2,621 2,770 New Traffic 450 490 Project Percentage 12.0% (54/450) 16.1% (79/490) Dollar Amount $81 Total for Project $169 b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in significant impacts if it conflicts with the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) through reducing the Level of Service of a non-exempt segment to fall to “F”. If LOS for a non-exempt segment is reduced to “F”, a deficiency plan outlining specific mitigation measure and a schedule for mitigating the deficiency will be required. The nearest affected CMP designated arterials within the Project vicinity are Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. As shown above, the Project will not reduce the Level of Service for a non-exempt CMP segment to LOS “F”. While the Project will add new vehicle trips to the local roadway system, impacts to CMP designated roadways would be less than significant. Impacts to CMP designated freeways will be less than significant. c) No Impact. A significant impact would occur if the Project caused a change in air traffic patterns that would result in a substantial safety risk. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan and does not include any structures that would change air traffic patterns or uses that would generate air traffic. Therefore, no impacts related to a change in air traffic patterns would occur. d) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the Project substantially increased an existing hazardous design feature or introduced incompatible uses to the existing traffic pattern. Access to the Project site is proposed via a 50-foot shared driveway on Arrow Route. The design of the Project would comply with all applicable City regulations. Furthermore, the Project does not involve changes in the alignment of Arrow Route, other than to widen the westbound right-turn lane, and the proposed car wash is consistent with existing commercial uses adjacent to the Project site on the west and south. The Project would not result in a traffic safety hazard due to any design features. No impact would occur. e) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the design of the Project would not satisfy emergency access requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or in any other way threaten the ability of emergency vehicles to access and serve the Project site or adjacent uses. The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. As discussed above, access to the Project site is proposed via a shared driveway on Arrow Route. The driveway width, 50 feet, is sufficient to provide access to fire and emergency vehicles and is consistent with the California Fire Code requiring a minimum of 20 feet. All access features are subject to and must satisfy the City of Rancho Cucamonga design requirements, including the Fire Department’s requirements. The Project would result in less than significant impacts with regard to emergency access. f) Less than Significant Impact. Public bus transit service in the Project vicinity is currently provided by the OmniTrans Route 66. Route 66 stops along a route to include the following stops: Montclair Plaza, Central & Foothill, Upland High School, San Antonio Hospital, Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Victoria Gardens, Juniper and Foothill, and Fontana Metrolink Transit 203 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 82 Initial Study Center.42 Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will also not be affected by the proposed Project. The Project would not conflict with or decrease the performance or safety of these services. Impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The traffic study addresses both the Project-specific and the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. The Project would have a significant impact to the intersections of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route during Horizon Year (2040) conditions. However, this impact would occur without development of the Project and mitigation is not feasible given existing geometry and traffic conditions. Therefore, impacts from the Project are considered less than significant and no cumulatively considerable impact will occur. 204 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 83 4.17 – Tribal Cultural Resources Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a Cultural Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or □ □ □ b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. □ □ □ a -b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Assembly Bill (AB) 52 specifies that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change to a defined Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) may result in a significant effect on the environment. AB 52 requires tribes interested in development Projects within a traditionally and culturally affiliated geographic area to notify a lead agency of such interest and to request notification of future Projects subject to CEQA prior to determining if a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. The lead agency is then required to notify the tribe within 14 days of deeming a development application subject to CEQA complete to notify the requesting tribe as an invitation to consult on the Project. AB 52 identifies examples of mitigation measures that will avoid or minimize impacts to TCR. The bill makes the above provisions applicable to Projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative declaration circulated on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 amends Sections 5097.94 and adds Sections 21073, 21074, 2108.3.1., 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3 to the California Public Resources Code (PRC), relating to Native Americans. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As part of the findings process, the City sent an email to the NAHC requesting a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within San Bernardino County. A response from the NAHC was received on September 7, 2018. The following tribes were listed by the NAHC as having traditional lands or cultural places within the County: Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and Serrano Nation of Mission Indians. Further, MIG sent a request to the NAHC on September 26, 2018 to search their SLF to ascertain whether their files contained any new information relating to the presence of Native American cultural resources within the Project area generally and on the Project site specifically. A response letter was received indicating the absence of documentation of tribal resources in the Project area or on the Project site. However, in accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), which added various provisions to the California Public Resources 205 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 84 Initial Study Code (PRC) that concern Tribal Cultural Resources, including Section 21080.3.1(d), the City contacted local tribes requesting to be notified of Projects. Responses were received from three local tribes: the Morongo Band of Mission Indians (MBMI), The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI), and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (BBMIKN). The Morongo Band of Mission Indians had no information to provide and did not request formal consultation or mitigation. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4and SMBMI-5 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. As such, Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4 and SMBMI-5 have been incorporated herein. The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources and Mitigation Measures GBMIKN- 4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains. These measures are incorporated into the Cultural Resources section of this document. In addition, Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-4 are incorporated herein to further address potential impacts related to TCR’s encountered during Project implementation. Mitigation Measure TCR-1 requires that a qualified tribal representative conduct tribal cultural resources sensitivity training for construction personnel. Mitigation Measure TCR-2 requires that a qualified Native American monitor be present during all construction excavations into non-fill sediments. If tribal cultural resources are encountered, Mitigation Measure TCR-3 requires that all ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the find and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established around the find until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure TCR-4 requires that the Native American monitor prepare a final report at the conclusion of monitoring activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 through SMBMI-5, GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-8, and TCR- 1 through TCR-4, impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural 206 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 85 resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation the Project would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since projects would be subject to individual project-level environmental review. Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect tribal cultural resources and prevent significant impact to such resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. 207 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 86 Initial Study 4.18 – Utilities and Service Systems Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? □ □ □ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? □ □ □ e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? □ □ □ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs? □ □ □ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could affect Regional Water Quality Control Board treatment standards by increasing wastewater production such that expansion of existing facilities or construction of new facilities would be required. Exceeding the RWQCB treatment standards could result in contamination of surface or groundwater with pollutants such as pathogens and nitrates. New development in the City is required to install wastewater infrastructure concurrent with Project development. Wastewater conveyance is handled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Wastewater is processed by CVWD and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). CVWD is one of eight member agencies that operate under the IEUA. IEUA operates 5 interconnected regional water-recycling facilities that treat approximately 60 million gallons per day (mgd) and have a combined permitted capacity of 84.4 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409). Two of the five IEUA 208 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 87 treatment plants serve development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4). At all IEUA treatment plants, wastewater is subject to tertiary-level water treatment, which produces effluent suitable for reuse (e.g. irrigation, wetlands/wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge). Per the General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (2010), the treatment plant RP-1 currently has an average excess capacity of approximately 9 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409) and the portion of the City served by RP-1 (the western half and southern third) are the more developed areas of the City; therefore, additional development and redevelopment sufficient to exceed the remaining capacity of RP-1 is not anticipated. Wastewater generation more than RP- 1’s capacity, though considered unlikely, would be diverted to RP-4. RP-4 provides a current excess capacity of 7.9 mgd and a potential excess capacity of 21.9 mgd.43 All wastewater generated by the interior plumbing system of the car wash would be discharged into the local sewer main and conveyed for treatment at one of the above facilities. Wastewater flows associated with the car wash would consist of the same kinds of substances typically generated by commercial uses and no modifications to any existing wastewater treatment systems or construction of any new ones would be needed to treat this Project’s wastewater. Water use for the car wash was conservatively estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle based on estimates provided by the Applicant. The number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually, total water demand for the car wash is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year (10,500 gpd). Outdoor water use for landscaping is estimated at 420,480 gallons per year (1,152 gpd), for a total water use of 2,336,730 gallons per year (6,402 gpd). Wastewater is typically estimated to be 80 percent of total water use. Therefore, estimated wastewater generation from interior demand and outdoor irrigation demand for the proposed car wash development is 1,869,530 (5,122 gpd). This volume is within the remaining capacity of the CVWD’s 21.9 mgd total treatment capacity. This Project would thus have a less-than-significant impact on the ability of the CVWD to operate within its established wastewater treatment requirements, which are enforced via the facility’s NPDES permit authorized by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to wastewater treatment requirements of the SARWQCB. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) would supply water to the Project. CVWD’s drinking water comes from two primary sources: local groundwater and imported water. CVWD manages its supply and demand with careful analysis regarding customer need and population estimates to ensure there will be an adequate supply of clean, reliable water into the future. CVWD, like most other agencies, creates a Water Supply Master Plan every few years that helps guide our operations and water supply investments. CVWD has a diverse water supply portfolio that helps decrease its dependence on imported water. Finding new sources of water is critical to ensuring water supply reliability for CVWD’s customers. CVWD has been building a network of wells to take advantage of local groundwater supplies. The District's diversified supply ensures a reliable water supply during times of drought, regulatory constraints and other emergencies. CVWD maintains 34 reservoirs with a total capacity to store 95 million gallons of water in our service area. Water Code § 10910-10915 require the preparation of a water supply assessment (WSA) demonstrating sufficient water supplies for any subdivision that involves the construction of more than 500 dwelling units, or the equivalent thereof. As the Project is below the established thresholds, no WSA is required. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD, approximately 48 percent of CVWD’s overall supply comes from local groundwater wells in the Chino Groundwater Basin and the Cucamonga Basin. CVWD currently operates 20 groundwater wells throughout its service area. Three percent of the water delivered to CVWD consumers is local canyon and tunnel water that flows out of nearby canyons and foothills, often a combination of surface and groundwater. These sources include Cucamonga Canyon, Day Canyon, Deer Canyon, East Etiwanda Canyon, and a number of tunnels in the local mountains. This water is treated at CVWD’s Arthur H. Bridge or Lloyd W. Michael Treatment Plants, flows into storage reservoirs, and then into the distribution system to consumers. CVWD purchases 46 percent of its water through the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, who purchases water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), a regional water wholesaler that delivers imported water from the State Water Project. State Water Project water originates in Northern California in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, and makes a 400 mile journey to the CVWD service area. This water is treated at CVWD’s Lloyd W. Michael Water Treatment Plant, the largest conventional treatment plant in the region. The treated water is stored in reservoirs until it is needed by consumers. The water used within the CVWD service area as of 2015 was 209 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 88 Initial Study approximately 41,451 AFY and is expected to increase to 63,700 AFY (during a normal year) by the year 2035, an increase of 22,249 AFY.44 Based on the CalEEMod assumptions, the combined estimated water demand for the proposed Project is approximately 7.17 AFY, within the estimated increase in water demand. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD, there is sufficient supply to accommodate demand under normal and single- and multiple-dry year conditions utilizing imported water.45 Local supplies would supplement imported supplies and provide additional supply reliability. Local supplies include groundwater pumped from the Cucamonga and Chino groundwater Basins, desalinated groundwater, and recycled water. The UWMP is based on area population Projections as provided by SCAG. As discussed in Section 4.13, the Project is consistent with SCAG Projections for the service area. As the estimated increase in water use is within the anticipated increase in the UWMP and the Project is consistent with regional population Projections, impacts would be less than significant. Regarding wastewater facilities, as discussed in the preceding response, wastewater generated at the Project site is treated at IEUA’s Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4) facilities. The proposed Project is estimated to have a combined wastewater generation of approximately 5,122 gpd. This generation is well within the existing remaining treatment capacity of RP-1 and RP-4. Therefore, the expansion of the existing facility would not be required. Connections to local water and sewer mains would involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that would occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. The Project site is located within the existing service area of CVWD and is surrounded by existing development that is currently connected to existing CVWD water and wastewater lines. No additional improvements are needed to either water lines, sewer lines, or treatment facilities to serve the Project. Standard connection fees would address any incremental impacts of the Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts as a result of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts could occur as a result of this Project if storm water runoff was increased to a level that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities. As discussed in the Hydrology section, the Project would not generate any increased runoff from the site that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities. A NPDES permit would be required for the Project and, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, all construction Projects shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion shall also be applied pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.110. Implementation of BMPs would reduce pollutants in stormwater and urban runoff from the Project site. The proposed storm drainage system and BMPs must be designed to the satisfaction of the City’s Public Works Director and in conformance with all applicable permits and regulations. The Project applicant/developer would be required to provide all necessary on-site infrastructure. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation beyond compliance with existing regulations is required. The proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on requiring the construction of new facilities or expansion of existing storm drainage facilities. d) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in significant impacts if it required additional water supplies than are currently entitled. Water demand is provided by survey data utilized in the CalEEMod air quality model. Total water demand for the proposed Project is estimated at 2,336,610 gallons per year or 7.17 AFY. This number represents a conservative estimate because the proposed car wash would also utilize recycled water for car wash needs. Water demand within the EMWD service area is anticipated to increase by 22,249 AFY between 2015 and 2035. The Project’s conservative estimated water demand, 7.17 AFY, is well within anticipated increase in demand. Based on the CVWD 2015 UWMP, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project’s estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies, and therefore would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. As summarized above, the 2015 UWMP indicates that there is adequate supply to serve the projected demand. The Project would comply with all water conservation and efficiency standards required by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Works 210 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 89 Department. Therefore, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project’s estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies and would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. e) Less than Significant Impact. As detailed in Sections 4.17.a and 4.17.b, the Project would be adequately served by existing facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. f) Less than Significant Impact. Significant impacts could occur if the Project would exceed the existing permitted landfill capacity or violates federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Solid Waste services are provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division (SWMD). Solid waste collection and transport in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities. The County of San Bernardino contracted Burrtec to operate and maintain their solid waste disposal facilities located throughout the County. Solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Burrtec’s West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, a County Class III (i.e., municipal waste) landfill located at 2390 North Alder Avenue in Rialto (Ceballos 2009). According to the 2010 General Plan Update, Mid Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tons/day), a remaining capacity of 670,000 cubic yards (cy), and an anticipated close date of 2033. Landfill capacity is expected to decrease over time with future growth and development throughout San Bernardino County and surrounding Inland Empire areas. Waste reduction and recycling programs and regulations are expected to reduce this demand and extend the life of existing landfills. Construction and operation of the proposed Project would result in an estimated net increase in solid waste disposal of 27.85 tons per year. This increase is well within the remaining capacity of Mid-Valley Landfill’s daily permitted capacity. This nominal incremental increase in solid waste disposal, assuming that all solid waste in the City would be disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, would not be considered cumulative considerable. Therefore, impacts related to the proposed Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Compliance with County waste reduction programs and policies would reduce the volume of solid waste entering landfills. Individual development projects within the County would be required to comply with applicable state and local regulations, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50 percent. The Project would increase the volume of solid waste generated in the County by 27.85 tons per year. According to CalRecycle, solid waste facilities serving San Bernardino County are projected to have a combined annual disposal limit of 3,633,512 tons and an annual remaining lifetime capacity surplus of 154,709,576 tons in the year 2025.46 Combined remaining capacities at the landfills would be adequate to accommodate the proposed Project. Impacts related to sufficient landfill capacity are anticipated to be less than significant. g) No Impact. The Project is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, County, and City statutes and regulations related to solid waste as a standard Project condition of approval. Therefore, no impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to utilities/service systems. The Project would require use of existing water and wastewater infrastructure, as well as existing, available solid waste disposal for building facility operation. Development of public utility infrastructure is part of an extensive planning process involving utility providers and jurisdictions with discretionary review authority. The coordination process associated with the preparation of development and infrastructure plans is intended to ensure that adequate resources are available to serve both individual projects and cumulative demand for resources and infrastructure as a result of cumulative growth and development in the area. Individual projects are subject to review for utility capacity to avoid unanticipated interruptions in service or inadequate supplies. Coordination with the utility companies would allow for the provision of utility service to the Project and other developments. The Project and other planned projects are subject to connection and service fees to assist in facility expansion and service improvements triggered by an increase in demand. Because of the utility planning and coordination activities described above, no significant cumulative utility impacts are anticipated. 211 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 90 Initial Study 4.19 – Mandatory Findings of Significance Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? □ □ □ b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? □ □ □ c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed Project would not substantially impact any scenic vistas, scenic resources, or the visual character of the area, as discussed in Section 4.1 and would not result in excessive light or glare. The Project site is located within a developed area with no natural habitat. The Project would not significantly impact any sensitive plants, plant communities, fish, wildlife or habitat for any sensitive species. There would be no impact to migratory birds. Adverse impacts to historic resources would not occur with mitigation incorporation. Construction-phase procedures would be implemented in the event any important cultural, archaeological, or paleontological resources are discovered during grading, consistent with Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-9. This site is not known to have any association with an important example of California’s history or prehistory. Based on the preceding analysis of potential impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17, no evidence is presented that this Project would degrade the quality of the environment. Impacts related to degradation of the environment, biological resources, and cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would result in significant impacts in the following areas: cultural resources, noise, and traffic. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for each of these environmental issue areas in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Standard conditions would also be imposed upon the Project. Other new development projects within the City would also be subject to these requirements. All other impacts of the Project were determined either to have no impact or to be less than significant, without the need for mitigation. Cumulatively, the Project would not result in any significant impacts that would substantially combine with impacts of other current or probable future impacts. Therefore, the Project, in conjunction with other future projects, would not result in any cumulatively considerable impacts. c) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the analysis of the Project’s impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17, there is no indication that the proposed Project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of temporary adverse effects during construction related to noise these would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation. Long-term effects include increased vehicular traffic, traffic-related noise, use 212 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 91 of household hazardous materials, emissions of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, and increased demand on emergency response services. The analysis herein concludes that direct and indirect environmental effects would at worst require mitigation to reduce to less than significant levels. Environmental effects would result in less than significant impacts. Based on the analysis in this Initial Study, the City finds that direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. 213 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 92 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank 214 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 93 5 Mitigation Summary BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. 215 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 94 Initial Study CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. 216 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 95 GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). 217 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 96 Initial Study GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. NOI-1 The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction:  Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: 218 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 97  Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays.  All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment.  The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction.  Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited.  Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance.  The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site.  If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks during grading and earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction 219 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 98 Initial Study excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. 220 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 99 6 References 6.1 – List of Preparers City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) Planning Department 909-477-2750 Ext.4314 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730  Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner MIG (Environmental Analysis) 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 951-787-9222  Pamela Steele, Principal  Bob Prasse, Director of Environmental Services  Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY (Phase I ESA) 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California 91784 951-315-3517  Christopher Krall, Engineering Geologist LDN CONSULTING, INC. (Noise) 42428 Chisolm Trail Murrieta, California 92562 760-473-1253  Jeremy Louden, Principal Trames Solutions, Inc. (Traffic and Transportation) 4225 Oceanside Blvd., #354H Oceanside, California 92056 760-291-1400  Scott Sato, P.E. 6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted None 221 References 100 Initial Study 6.3 – Bibliography 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. May, 2010. 2 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Los Angeles County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm [August 2018]. 3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: San Bernardino County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm [September 2018]. 4 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ [September 2018]. 5 California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/SanBernardino_so_15_16_WA.pdf [September 2018]. 6 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 1993. 7 California Air Resources Board. South Coast Air Quality Management Plans. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/scabsip/scabsip.htm. [February 2020]. 8 International Car Wash Association. Water Use, Evaporation and Carryout in Professional Car Washes. By Chris Brown Consulting. https://www.carwash.org/docs/default-source/2018-water-study/ica---water-quality.pdf?sfvrsn=c271db4b_2. [February 2020]. 9 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. 11 San Bernardino Associated Governments. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. June 2016. 12 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CNDDB Quick View Tool: Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018410-cnddb-quickview-tool [September 2018]. 13 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html [September 2019]. 14 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. NCCP Plan Summaries. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=15329&inline [September 2018]. 15 California State Department of Conservation. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/ap/ap_maps.htm [September 2018]. 16 San Bernardino County: Land Use Services. Geologic Hazard Overlay maps. http://cms.sbcounty.gov/lus/Planning/ZoningOverlayMaps/GeologicHazardMaps.aspx [September 2018]. 17 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009. 18 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions. August 2010 19 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 20 State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [September 2018]. 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. Amended October 5, 2007 22 California Department of Toxic Substances. Draft Lead Report. June 2004. 23 California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ [September 2018]. 24 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List – Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm [September 2018]. 25 California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [September 2018]. 222 References Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 101 26 California State Water Resources Control Board. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/files/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList- CurrentList.pdf [September 2018]. 27 California State Water Resources Control Board. List of Active CDO and CAO. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ [September 2018]. 28 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a). https://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962-5a/ [September 2018]. 29 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/ [September 2018] 30 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones In LRA – South West San Bernardino County. November 2008. 31 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number 06071C8630J. February 18, 2015. 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Health and Safety Element. Figure PS-6. May 2010. 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Resource Conservation Element. Figure CR-2. May 2010. 34 Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment. May 26, 2018. 35 Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Construction Noise Assessment. January 7, 2019. 36 California Department of Transportation. Basics of Highway Noise: Technical Noise Supplement. September 2013. 37 California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. General Plan Guidelines. 2003. 38 California Department of Transportation. Transportation- and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. September 2013. 39 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/ [September 2018]. 40 The Brookings Institute. Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. 1999. 41 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 42 OmniTrans. Route 66: Fontana-Foothill-Montclair. http://www.omnitrans.org/schedules/route66/ [September 2018]. 43 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 44 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 45 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 46 CalRecycle. Identify Disposal Facility Capacity Shortfalls. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/FacIT/facility/disposalgap.aspx [September 2018]. 223 Appendix A Air Quality/ GHG 0RGelinJ 'ata 224 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 225 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 1 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 226 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 2 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 227 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 3 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 228 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 6.4193 1.2974 7.3023 3.0347 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 6.4193 1.2974 7.3023 3.0347 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 2.9378 1.2974 3.8209 1.3786 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 2.9378 1.2974 3.8209 1.3786 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 4 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 229 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 7 4,905.769 7 0.2509 1.4000e- 003 4,912.460 3 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 7 4,905.769 7 0.2509 1.4000e- 003 4,912.460 3 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 5 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 230 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 6 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 231 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 7 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 232 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 8 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 233 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0775 2.6797 0.5361 7.0700e- 003 0.1572 0.0100 0.1672 0.0431 9.5800e- 003 0.0527 765.8097 765.8097 0.0549 767.1828 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 003 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 9 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 234 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0775 2.6797 0.5361 7.0700e- 003 0.1572 0.0100 0.1672 0.0431 9.5800e- 003 0.0527 765.8097 765.8097 0.0549 767.1828 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 003 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 10 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 235 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 11 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 236 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 3.2175 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 12 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 237 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 13 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 238 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 14 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 239 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0429 1.2627 0.3114 2.8300e- 003 0.0704 8.3700e- 003 0.0788 0.0203 8.0100e- 003 0.0283 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 302.4713 Worker 0.1262 0.0883 1.1646 3.0800e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- 003 307.1345 Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 003 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 0.1074 608.8574 608.8574 0.0299 609.6058 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 15 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 240 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0429 1.2627 0.3114 2.8300e- 003 0.0704 8.3700e- 003 0.0788 0.0203 8.0100e- 003 0.0283 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 302.4713 Worker 0.1262 0.0883 1.1646 3.0800e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- 003 307.1345 Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 003 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 0.1074 608.8574 608.8574 0.0299 609.6058 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 16 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 241 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 17 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 242 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 18 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 243 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 19 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 244 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 20 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 245 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Unmitigated 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 21 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 246 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 NaturalGas Unmitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 22 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 247 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 649.088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 0.649088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 23 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 248 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 24 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 249 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 25 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 250 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 26 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer 251 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 1 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 252 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 2 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 253 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 3 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 254 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 7.3023 3.0347 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 7.3023 3.0347 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 2.9378 1.2976 3.8209 1.3786 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 2.9378 1.2976 3.8209 1.3786 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 4 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 255 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 3 4,654.254 3 0.2519 1.4000e- 003 4,660.968 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 3 4,654.254 3 0.2519 1.4000e- 003 4,660.968 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 5 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 256 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 6 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 257 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 7 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 258 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 8 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 259 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0796 2.7162 0.5754 6.9500e- 003 0.1572 0.0102 0.1674 0.0431 9.7600e- 003 0.0528 752.9340 752.9340 0.0571 754.3624 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 003 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 9 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 260 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0796 2.7162 0.5754 6.9500e- 003 0.1572 0.0102 0.1674 0.0431 9.7600e- 003 0.0528 752.9340 752.9340 0.0571 754.3624 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 003 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 10 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 261 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 11 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 262 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 3.2175 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 12 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 263 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 13 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 264 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 14 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 265 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0447 1.2643 0.3448 2.7500e- 003 0.0704 8.5000e- 003 0.0789 0.0203 8.1300e- 003 0.0284 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 Worker 0.1386 0.0971 1.0581 2.8900e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- 003 288.0891 Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 003 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 0.1076 581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 15 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 266 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0447 1.2643 0.3448 2.7500e- 003 0.0704 8.5000e- 003 0.0789 0.0203 8.1300e- 003 0.0284 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 Worker 0.1386 0.0971 1.0581 2.8900e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- 003 288.0891 Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 003 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 0.1076 581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 16 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 267 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 17 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 268 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 18 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 269 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 19 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 270 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 20 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 271 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Unmitigated 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 21 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 272 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 NaturalGas Unmitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 22 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 273 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 649.088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 0.649088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 23 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 274 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 24 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 275 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 25 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 276 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 26 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter 277 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 1 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 278 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 2 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 279 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 3 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 280 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0302 0.0502 0.0804 0.0105 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 126.7630 126.7630 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0302 0.0502 0.0804 0.0105 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 126.7630 126.7630 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0238 0.0502 0.0740 7.4600e- 003 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 126.7629 126.7629 0.0211 0.0000 127.2908 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0238 0.0502 0.0740 7.4600e- 003 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 126.7629 126.7629 0.0211 0.0000 127.2908 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.24 0.00 7.99 28.68 0.00 5.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 4 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 281 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Energy 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 36.2252 36.2252 1.2200e- 003 4.3000e- 004 36.3847 Mobile 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 0.0000 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6079 9.4381 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 003 0.6557 9.4400e- 003 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 003 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 818.4746 0.4392 1.9800e- 003 830.0464 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2019 3-31-2019 0.6357 0.6357 2 4-1-2019 6-30-2019 0.4763 0.4763 Highest 0.6357 0.6357 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 5 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 282 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Energy 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 36.2252 36.2252 1.2200e- 003 4.3000e- 004 36.3847 Mobile 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 0.0000 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6079 9.4381 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 003 0.6557 9.4400e- 003 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 003 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 818.4746 0.4392 1.9800e- 003 830.0464 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 6 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 283 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 7 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 284 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 8 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 285 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 9.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Total 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 9 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 286 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3456 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 Total 7.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4112 0.4112 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4119 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Total 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 1.0600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 10 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 287 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3456 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 Total 7.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4112 0.4112 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4119 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Total 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.1600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 3.6000e- 003 1.5100e- 003 4.1000e- 004 1.9200e- 003 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 11 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 288 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Total 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Total 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 6.8000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 12 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 289 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Total 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 0.0000 3.8100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.0200e- 003 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Total 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 7.5700e- 003 1.1000e- 003 8.6700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 1.0200e- 003 4.8300e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 13 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 290 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.4100e- 003 0.0000 3.4100e- 003 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.0200e- 003 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Total 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 1.1000e- 003 4.5100e- 003 1.7100e- 003 1.0200e- 003 2.7300e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 14 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 291 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 0.0000 91.9759 Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 0.0000 91.9759 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 15 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 292 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0644 0.0164 1.4000e- 004 3.4700e- 003 4.2000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.5661 Worker 6.2600e- 003 4.9900e- 003 0.0543 1.5000e- 004 0.0143 1.1000e- 004 0.0144 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 0.0000 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.2736 Total 8.4400e- 003 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 004 0.0177 5.3000e- 004 0.0183 4.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 26.8397 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5359 91.5359 0.0176 0.0000 91.9758 Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5359 91.5359 0.0176 0.0000 91.9758 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 16 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 293 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0644 0.0164 1.4000e- 004 3.4700e- 003 4.2000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.5661 Worker 6.2600e- 003 4.9900e- 003 0.0543 1.5000e- 004 0.0143 1.1000e- 004 0.0144 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 0.0000 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.2736 Total 8.4400e- 003 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 004 0.0177 5.3000e- 004 0.0183 4.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 26.8397 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.2600e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Paving 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4400e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 17 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 294 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.2600e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Paving 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4400e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 18 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 295 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e- 004 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 19 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 296 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e- 004 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 20 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 297 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 21 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 298 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Unmitigated 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 22 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 299 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.5824 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.5824 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 23 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 300 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 236917 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 236917 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 24 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 301 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 74013.8 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 74013.8 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 25 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 302 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 4.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Total 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 26 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 303 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 4.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Total 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 27 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 304 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Unmitigated 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 1.91625 / 0.42036 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 28 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 305 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 1.91625 / 0.42036 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 29 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 306 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Unmitigated 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 27.85 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 30 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 307 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 27.85 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 31 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 308 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 32 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual 309 Appendix B 3Kase , Cultural 5esRurFes Assessment 5PCFQSPWJEFE 310 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 311 HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION Arbor Express Car Wash Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County , California Prepared for: Ruth Villalobos, President Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. Ontario, California 91764 Prepared by: David Brunzell, M.A., RPA BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 Project No. RVA1802 Data Base Information: Type of Study: Intensive Survey Resources Recorded: Post War Residence at 9760 Arrow Route, Beverly Hills House at 9786 Arrow Route (Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark No. 32) USGS Quadrangle: 7.5-minute Guasti, California (1981) December 7, 2018 312 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and privately owned residential properties to the east and west. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). A s such it is not recommended a “historical resource” under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate 313 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT iii the physical impact on the environment caused by demolition or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. 314 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC SETTING .............................................................................................................. 1 PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 RESEARCH ...................................................................................................................... 3 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................................ 3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 4 RESEARCH ...................................................................................................................... 4 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................................ 5 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ............................................................................................ 6 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 6 CALIFORNIA REGISTER EVALUATIONS ....................................................................... 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 9 FIGURES 1: Project Location Map ........................................................................................................ 2 TABLES A: Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site ............................... 4 APPENDICES A: DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS B: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT C: NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE 315 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 1 INTRODUCTION BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, a church and privately owned residential properties to the east, and Archibald Avenue to the west. The project site is located in Section 11 of Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. It is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Guasti, California (1981) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). HISTORIC SETTING Please note that references for this section are provided in Appendix A. The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native Americ an group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. In 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain, the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide. Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth cent ury, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864. German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes were the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus, olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda, where they tested their ground-breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882, the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro-electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts (also speculative agricultural colonies) were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to form Iomosa. When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma. The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma’s infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and workers to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit 316 ProjectArea Created by Brent Rolf, Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Vicinity Map Project Location Site Arbor Express Car Wash Project Reference: ESRI; USGS Quad: Guasti, California (1981) Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. Project Location Figure 1 0 10 20 Miles ´0 0.5 1 Miles 0 0.5 10.25 Kilometers 317 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 3 packinghouses, and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma’s local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum. After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California’s population expanded, but the process was gradual at first . Suburban expansion continued and the area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty-first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past. PERSONNEL David Brunzell, M.A., RPA acted as the Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the current study. Mr. Brunzell also compiled the Department of Park and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms and technical report. BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Joseph Orozco, M.A. ABD completed the record search through the South Central Coastal Information Center. BCR Consulting Staff Historian Dylan Williams, B.A. conducted the additional research, and BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Nicholas Shepetuk performed the field survey. METHODS Research Records Search. On November 29, 2018, a records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the current project. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and the Inventory of Historic Structures. Additional Research. BCR Consulting performed additional research through records of the General Land Office Maintained by the Bureau of Land Management, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the San Bernardino County Assessor, San Bernardino County Historical Archives, and through various Internet resources. Field Survey An intensive-level field survey of the project site was conducted on November 19, 2018. Property access was limited so survey methods included making observations and taking detail and context photographs of the subject property and buildings. Based on these limitations, archaeological resources have not been assessed for the current project. The historic-period buildings were recorded on DPR 523 forms. Cultural resources were 318 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 4 recorded per the California OHP Instructions for Recording Historical Resources in the field using: • Detailed note taking for entry on DPR Forms (see Appendix A) • Digital photography of all cultural resources (see Appendix A). RESULTS Research Records Search. Data from the SCCIC revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (23 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. The records search is summarized as follows: Table A. Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site USGS 7.5 Min Quad Cultural Resources Within 1 Mile of Project Site Studies W/in 1 Mile Guasti, California (1981) P-36-2910: Historic-Period Nat. Trails Hwy. (3/4 Mile NW) P-36-10289H: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NE) P-36-12367: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile NE) P-36-16422: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile S) P-36-16423: Historic-Period Building (1/2 Mile SE) P-36-16425: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile SW) P-36-16435: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile NW) P-36-16436: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile SW) P-36-16438: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile E) P-36-16439: Historic-Period Market (1/2 Mile E) P-36-16440: Historic-Period Milliken Ranch (3/4 Mile E) P-36-16458: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile NW) P-36-16459: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile N) P-36-16460: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile N) P-36-16462: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NE) P-36-16480: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NW) P-36-16481: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16482: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16483: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16484: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16485: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16486: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-21512: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile NW) P-36-23221: Historic Cucamonga District (3/4 Mile NW) SB-106-0178, 0311, 0325, 0341, 0356, 0449, 1262, 1473, 2290, 3572, 3589, 4138, 4165, 4667, 5493, 6812, 6817, 6952, 7048, 7387, 7484, 7854, 7855 Additional Research. Additional research was performed for the project site to provide the background for the two properties developed during the historic era (i.e. greater than 45 years ago) within its boundaries (see also Field Survey Results, below). Review of the City’s Historic Landmarks Points of Interest indicated that the Beverly Hills House (at 9786 Arrow Route) has been designated as City Landmark #32 (see Appendix A). 319 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 5 9760 Arrow Route. The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954. Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joint ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today (see Appendix A for references). 9786 Arrow Route (Beverly Hills House). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (see Appendix A for references). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler’s reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (ibid.). Field Survey 9760 Arrow Route. This property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage un it and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false-paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). Since access was limited, descriptions are made using available photographs and observations from the edge of the property boundary. This property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It was built using Spanish Colonial style architecture popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta- colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence. 320 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 6 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS During the field survey, four historic-period buildings on two separate properties were identified. CEQA calls for the evaluation and recordation of historic and archaeological resources. The criteria for determining the significance of impacts to cultural resources are based on Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and Guidelines for the Nomination of Properties to the California Register. Properties eligible for listing in the California Register and subject to review under CEQA are those meeting the criteria for listing in the California Register, or designation under a local ordinance. Significance Criteria California Register of Historical Resources. The California Register criteria are based on National Register criteria. City Landmark Designation criteria are similar to California Register criteria; the differences are bracketed [ ] below. For a property to be eligible for inclusion on the California Register or as a City Landmark, one or more of the following criteria must be met: 1. It is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local [including City] or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the U.S.; 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local [the City’s], California, or U.S. history; 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, represents the work of a master, possesses high artistic values; and/or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, the California Register requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource’s period of significance to “obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resourc es.” (CCR 4852 [d][2]). The California Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its significance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. California Register Evaluation 9760 Arrow Route. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is therefore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual or possess high artistic values. 321 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 7 Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic -age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under CEQA. Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California’s suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house’s integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). A full California Register eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the limited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark (#32). RECOMMENDATIONS The historic-period house at 9760 Arrow Route is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register. As such it is not recommended a “historical resource” under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic 322 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 8 documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate the physical impact on the environment caused by demolitio n or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Se ction 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (M LD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. 323 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 9 REFERENCES California Office of Historic Preservation 2001 2001 Technical Assistance Series #1. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Historical Resources. Electronic Document: http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/ 1054/files/ts01ca.pdf. Accessed 12/7/2018. United States Geological Survey 1981 Guasti, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. PLEASE SEE APPENDIX A FOR ADDITIONAL REFERENCES. 324 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX A DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS 325 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: 9760 Arrow Route P1. Other Identifier: N/A *P2. Location: ☐ Not for Publication ; Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9760 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155’ AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *P3a. Description: The subject property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage unit and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false- paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. *P3b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential *P4. Resources Present: ; Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐Element of District ☐Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Photo 1: View N. *P6. Date Constructed/ Age and Sources: ;Historic constructed 1954 (San Bernardino Assessor) ☐ Prehistoric ☐ Both *P7. Owner and Address: Matthews Living Trust Fund 9760 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA *P8. Recorded by: D,. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date: 11-19-18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Historical Resources Evaluation of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ☐NONE ☐ Location Map ☐ Sketch Map ; Continuation Sheet ;Building, Structure, and Object Record ☐Archaeological Record ☐District Record ☐Linear Feature Record ☐Milling Station Record ☐Rock Art Record ☐Artifact Record ☐Photograph Record ☐Other (List): P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) 326 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code: 6Z *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 9760 Arrow Route B1. Historic Name: N/A B2. Common Name: N/A B3. Original Use: Single-Family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-Family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Ranch/Postwar Minimal *B6. Construction History: The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954 (San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. *B7. Moved? ;No †Yes †Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: N/A *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: Mid-20th Century, 1954 Property Type: Single Family Property Applicable Criteria: N/A Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: 1950s Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: N/A B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical/architectural context by theme, period, and geographic scope. Address Integrity.) The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joi nt ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today (San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Rancho Cucamonga History The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native American group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. I n 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain, the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide. Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth century, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864 (City of Rancho Cucamonga). German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes w ere the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus, olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda, where they tested their ground -breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882, the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro -electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts (also speculative agricultural colonies) were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to form Iomosa. When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma (Emick 2011). (Continued on Continuation Sheet, page 3.) *B12. References: Emick, Paula, 2011 Images of America: Rancho Cucamonga. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston. City of Rancho Cucamonga, “Historic Landmarks, Points of Interest: Our Heritage,” Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, “San Bernardino County File Lot Book 047: ‘Cucamonga: Section 11 T1S R7W’”. San Bernardino Historic Archives, San Bernardino. San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Property Information Management System. Online assessor database. http://www.sbcounty.gov/assessor/pims/ accessed 11/14/18. *B14. Evaluators: David Brunzell, BCR Consulting, Claremont, California *Date of Evaluation: 12/7/18 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) 327 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 9760 Arrow Route Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams *Date: ; Continuation † Update *B10 (continued from page 2). The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma’s infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produ ce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and worke rs to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit packinghouses , and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma’s local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum. After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California’s population expanded, but the process was gradual at first (Emick 2011). The area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty -first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past (City of Rancho Cucamonga). Evaluation California Register of Historical Resources requires that a significance criterion (1 -4) be met for a resource to be eligible. A resource is eligible if (1) it is assoc iated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; (2) it is associated with the lives of persons important in California's past; (3) it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value; or (4) it has yielded or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The California Register also requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource’s period of significance (normally 45 years) to “obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resources” (CCR 4852 [d][2]). The Califor nia Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its signi ficance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route was fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is there fore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the subject property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creat ive individual or possess high artistic values. Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic-age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Thus BCR Consulting recommends the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Status Code “6Z”. Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California’s suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house’s integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. 328 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or #: The Beverly Hills House P1. Other Identifier: Beverly Hills House *P2. Location: ☐ Not for Publication ; Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9786 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155’ AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *P3a. Description: The subject property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It is a classic representation of Spanish Colonial style architecture that was popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta-colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence (San Bernardino Property Assessor 2018). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (City of Rancho Cucamonga ND). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler’s reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (San Bernardino County Records 1949-1951). A full California Register of Historical Resources eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the l imited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark (#32). References: San Bernardino County Assessor 2018. Records on File at the San Bernardino County Assessor. Accessed 11 /20/2018. City of Rancho Cucamonga ND. Historic Landmarks Pointes of Interest. Electronic Document: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/ filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=10247. Accessed 11/20/2018. *P3b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential *P4. Resources Present: ; Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐Element of District ☐Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Photo 1: Overview from Zillow.com. *P6. Date Constructed/ Age and Sources: ;Historic constructed in 1932 (San Bernardino Property Assessor [PIMS]) ☐Prehistoric ☐Both *P7. Owner and Address: Janice Y. Gruber 9786 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 *P8. Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date Recorded: 11/18/18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Cultural Resources Assessment of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ☐NONE ; Location Map ☐ Sketch Map ☐ Continuation Sheet ☐ Building, Structure, and Object Record ☐Archaeological Record ☐District Record ☐Linear Feature Record ☐Milling Station Record ☐Rock Art Record ☐Artifact Record ☐Photograph Record ☐Other (List): P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) 329 330 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX B PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT 331 332 333 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX C NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE 334 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION Cultural and Environmental Department 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: nahc@nahc.ca.gov Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov Twitter: @CA_NAHC December 4, 2018 Nicholas Shepetuk BCR Consulting LLC VIA Email to: nickshepetuk@gmail.com RE: Arbor Express Car Wash Project, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Shepetuk: A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: katy.sanchez@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, KATY SANCHEZ Associate Environmental Planner Attachment 335 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contacts List 12/4//2018 Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina 91723 (626) 926-4131 Gabrielino CA, admin@gabrielenoindians.org Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Anthony Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 San Gabriel 91778 (626) 483-3564 Cell Gabrielino Tongva CA, GTTribalcouncil@aol.com (626) 286-1262 Fax Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Sandonne Goad, Chairperson 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 Los Angeles 90012 (951) 807-0479 Gabrielino Tongva CA, sgoad@gabrielino-tongva.com Gabrielino /Tongva Nation This list is current as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code,Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code, or Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native American Tribes for the proposed: Arbor Express Car Wash Project, San Bernardino County. 336 Appendix C 3Kase , (nYirRnmental Site Assessment 337 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 338 RGS Engineering Geology 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California www.rgsgeosciences.com (951) 315-3517   Geologic Evaluation Fault/Seismic Studies Environmental Assessments Percolation Testing   June 14, 2018 Alan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 SUBJECT: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744, 9760, & 9786 Arrow Route (APN 0208-291-06, 03, & 02) Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Smith: Enclosed, please find our Phase I Environmental Assessment report for the subject property. Our services are generally guided by the provisions of the ASTM E 1527 and EPA AAI (CFR 40 312) standards. The objective of this study is to evaluate the environmental condition of the subject property and determine the likelihood of hazardous materials impact. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations relating to the environmental condition of the property are presented herein. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, RGS Engineering Geology _____________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Engineering Geologist Distribution: [1] Addressee (electronic) 339 1.0 SUMMARY _____________________________________________________________ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 1 2.1 Purpose __________________________________________________________________ 1 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services ________________________________________________ 1 2.3 Significant Assumptions __________________________________________________ 2 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions ________________________________________________ 2 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions _____________________________________________ 2 2.6 User Reliance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION _____________________________________________________ 2 3.1 Location and Legal Description ____________________________________________ 2 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ___________________________________ 3 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water) _________________ 4 3.5 Current Uses if the Adjoining Properties ____________________________________ 4 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ________________________________________ 4 4.1 Title Records _____________________________________________________________ 4 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations ________________________ 4 4.3 Specialized Knowledge ____________________________________________________ 4 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information _________________ 4 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ______________________________ 5 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I _____________________________________________ 5 4.8 Other ____________________________________________________________________ 5 5.0 RECORD REVIEW ______________________________________________________ 5 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ___________________________________ 5 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources __________________________________ 6 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) _________________________________________________ 6 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property __________________________________ 7 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties __________________________ 7 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ________________________________________________ 7 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ______________________________________ 7 6.2 General Site Setting _______________________________________________________ 8 6.3 Exterior Observations _____________________________________________________ 9 340 6.4 Interior Observations ______________________________________________________ 9 7.0 INTERVIEWS ___________________________________________________________ 9 7.1 Interview with Owner ______________________________________________________ 9 7.2 Interview with Site Manager _______________________________________________ 10 7.3 Interview with Occupants _________________________________________________ 10 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials _________________________________ 10 7.5 Interview with Others _____________________________________________________ 10 8.0 FINDINGS ______________________________________________________________ 11 9.0 OPINION ______________________________________________________________ 11 10.0 CONCLUSIONS _______________________________________________________ 11 11.0 DEVIATIONS __________________________________________________________ 12 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES _______________________________________________ 12 13.0 REREFENCES ________________________________________________________ 12 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) _______________ 12 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) ___________ 13 341 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Site Plan 1.0 SUMMARY In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject sites is considered low. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable conditions of the sites are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment conducted in accordance with our proposal and your written authorization. This report has been prepared in general conformance with applicable guidelines provided by various professional societies and institutions. Our field reconnaissance of the site was performed on Thursday June 13, 2018. The field reconnaissance involved traversing the property in order to observe surface soil conditions, structures, possible generators or storage of hazardous materials, drainage courses, land use, vegetation, and any notable surface conditions which would indicate the presence of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination on or near the site. 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to identify, to the extent feasible and pursuant to the processes presented herein, the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the properties or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water in connection with the properties. 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services The scope of work completed for this investigation included a field reconnaissance of the site and surrounding areas, historical record and document review, historic aerial photo review, and submittal of this report. 342 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 2.3 Significant Assumptions This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by environmental professionals practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. In addition, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. No soil/water sampling or testing was provided for this assessment. 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions In preparing this report, we were provided information derived from secondary sources. We have made no independent investigation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived from these sources. We have assumed the information provided to us by our sources was accurate and complete. 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms or conditions were brought to our attention or discovered through the course of our investigation relating to the environmental condition of the property. 2.6 User Reliance The findings and analyses set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluation(s) and is the property and for the sole use of our Client. However; RGS may, upon written authorization and instruction from the Client, provide copies of this report, and then only in total, to whom ever instructed. Additionally, Client, without any permission from RGS may assign this report to person(s) or entity(s) of their choice and all of the same entitlements, restrictions, and limitations apply to the new entity(s) as if they were the original requestor of services. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location and Legal Description The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route, just east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The site includes three contiguous properties with the following addresses and APN numbers: 343 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 9744 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-06-0000 9760 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-03-0000 9786 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-02-0000 The geographical relationships of the site and surrounding vicinity are depicted on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics The property located at 9744 Arrow Route is currently open and vacant. There are remnants of a previous single-family home on-site. The properties of 9760 and 9786 Arrow Route currently support occupied single-family home developments with appurtenant landscaping and yard improvements. Vegetation consists of a few mature landscape trees and landscape bushes and grass locally. Seasonal weeds and grasses occupy the open areas of the site. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient sloping to the south at less than two percent. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route which exists as an improved road with concrete curb, gutter, and pavement. 3.3 Current Use of the property Selected site photographs showing the physical condition of the property and man- made improvements are provided in Appendix B of this report for your review. The following is a brief description of the on-site features. Man-made features on the site include two single family residences with associated improvements such as driveways and landscaping. Overhead electrical lines serve the property and we assume underground utilities include sewer, water and gas. Other utilities may also be present. A pole mounted transformer was noted along the southern property line at 9760 Arrow Route. The transformer does not appear to be in a compromised condition, showing no visible leaks or damages. Asbestos The structures present on-site were likely constructed prior to the 1980’s and could contain asbestos containing materials (ACM). Prior to the deconstruction or remodeling, an asbestos and lead paint survey should be conducted by a professionally licensed consultant to determine the potential impacts from these substances, if any. 344 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water) No structures are present at 9744 Arrow Route. A residential structure is present at 9760 Arrow Route, and 9786 Arrow Route. Out buildings/sheds are also noted at 9786 Arrow Route. The residential structures and out buildings were not surveyed as part of this assessment and are reportedly limited to typical residential use and storage. No interior inspection was conducted or considered necessary as the homes are reportedly leased and used only for residential purpose. The homes are accessed along driveways extending from Arrow Route. On-site sewage disposal was likely used in the past. Septic tanks may be present on the properties. 3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties Based on our historical research, data review, and aerial photograph examination, the property is bordered to the north by a school, to the east by a residence, to the west by an abandoned gas station, and to the south by Arrow Route (4 lanes) and a retail shopping center. 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4.1 Title Records No title records were provided for our review. 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations No environmental liens or use limitation were provided by the client or known to exist in association with the property. 4.3 Specialized Knowledge We have not been provided with any specialized knowledge concerning the past land use or environmental condition of the property. 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Information has been obtained for the purpose of this Phase I environmental assessment from EDR resource group and together with our field inspection and document review represents commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information. 345 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No reduction in the value of the property related to environmental impacts, issues, or concerns has been reported. 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information The property is currently owned by: - 9744 Arrow Route - Dejager Family Trust - 9760 Arrow Route - Mathews, Cleotis and Jancy - 9786 Arrow Route - Graber, Janice 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I It is our understanding that the client intends to develop the site as a carwash. This phase I assessment was performed as part of the due diligence associated with the development. 4.8 Other No other information of significance was provided by our client for the purpose of our assessment. 5.0 RECORD REVIEW Records were obtained and reviewed that would help identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Reasonably ascertainable information, which was publicly available, obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and that was practically reviewable, was utilized. 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources For this ESA, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) provided a complete search of standard environmental records in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E 1527-05, Section 8.2.1. A complete list of the records searched and a copy of The EDR report is presented in Appendix 16.6. Information obtained by the review of standard records indicated the following: • No facilities are noted in a condition, location, or elevation that could impact the subject property. 346 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 6 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources Additionally, EDR and the client/user provided records for our review from the following local agencies. • San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services, Waste Management Department • San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department • California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region • California Department of Toxic Substance Control • California Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation • Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Copies of the records requests and agency responses are contained in Appendix 16.6. The remaining agencies did not report relative information within their files. 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) The physical setting of the property was determined by review of the USGS 7.5 Minute topographic map, Guasti Quadrangle and information provided by EDR. A complete list of referenced used to findings is provided in Section 13.0, References. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient of less than two percent sloping toward the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route. The subject site is situated within a natural geomorphic province in southern California known as the Peninsular Ranges which are one of California’s eleven geomorphic provinces, each of which display distinct geologic and topographic features. The Peninsular Ranges are bordered to the east by the Salton Trough and to the north by the Transverse Ranges (San Bernardino, San Gabriel, and Santa Monica Mountains). The Peninsular Range province extends southerly to the Baja peninsula and westerly to the Pacific Ocean. Elongated northwesterly- trending valleys and mountains structurally controlled by regional tectonic forces with elevated erosional surfaces generally characterize this province. The eastern portion of the province has been extensively uplifted by faulting and represents the highest and most rugged terrain including Mount San Jacinto at well over 10,000 feet elevation. From the east, the province gradually descends to the west toward the Pacific Ocean. The Peninsular Ranges are traversed by numerous northwest trending faults creating and subdividing the province into many sub-parallel, northwest trending ranges and valleys. The northwesterly trending mountains and valleys are flanked by regional faults, which remain active today, including the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault zones. 347 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 Locally, the site is situated on a broad alluvial fan emanating from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. These deposits consist of braised stream channel deposits of silt, sand, and gravel, and rocks. The largest sediments remain near the foothills while the finer material is distributed across the valley floor. 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property The properties were developed as rural residential homes during the 1950’s based on review of historic aerial photographs. The residences remain on the eastern two parcels. The home on the western parcel was demolished around 1985. Prior to the residential development, the property was used for agricultural purpose and appears to have young citrus trees planted during 1938. No records are available beyond that year. 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties Uses in the area surrounding the property were assessed to the extent information were revealed in the course of researching the property itself. This included aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, city directories and historical topographic maps. The adjacent properties have similarly been open and vacant land in the past. Agriculture was conducted just west of the site from at least 1938. During the 1950’s residential improvements were constructed on the adjoining properties and by 1959 no agricultural use is noted on the surrounding properties. The gas station to the west appears in 1985 and the school to the north between 1994 and 2006. Groundwater Conditions The specific depth of groundwater occurrence at the site could not be determined through the scope of our work and likely fluctuates seasonally. In general, groundwater occurs within the alluvial sediment and is recharged seasonally from mountain streams to the north. The static water table below the site is likely on the order of more than 300 feet below the ground surface considering the regional topography, physical properties of the sediment, and distance to mountain streams. The direction of groundwater flow is south, concurrent with the natural topography. 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The field reconnaissance was performed on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental 348 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 8 conditions in connection with the property. The property was visually and physically observed from all adjacent public thoroughfares and by traversing it in order to observe the existence of or potential indications of the present and past uses, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum products, above and underground storage tanks, odors, pools of liquid, drums and other containers, potentially PCB-containing electrical and hydraulic equipment, fuel sources, stains and corrosion of structures and equipment, drains and sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil and pavement, stressed vegetation, solid waste, trash, construction and demolition debris, mounds and depressions suggesting disposal, waste water or other liquid or any discharge into a drains, ditches, underground injection systems, or streams, wells, and septic systems and any other notable conditions which would indicate a recognized environmental condition in connection with the property. The western portion of the site exists as open, vacant land. The eastern portions are currently occupied by homes and were not accessible. Considering the size of the property, our methodology for site reconnaissance included review of government database lists, examination of aerial photographs, followed by site inspection of potential environmental conditions identified. The interior of the residence was not observed nor is inspection of the residence considered necessary as it is reportedly used solely for residential purposes. There were no other physical limitations or inaccessible site areas noted during our site visit. 6.2 General Site Setting The site is located along Arrow Route which exists as an improved, four-lane road. The property supports single-family residential development with no commercial or industrial operations. Topographically the site area is rather flat with a uniform gradient to the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south and is collected along storm water improvements associated with Arrow Route. Photographs of the site are presented in Appendix B. 349 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 9 6.3 Exterior Observations 6.4 Interior Observations The on-site homes are reportedly used for residential occupancy only. Accordingly no observation of the home interior is considered necessary or was conducted as part of this phase I. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with Owner Considering the open, vacant, and residential land use dating back to the 1950’s, interviews with the site manager and owner were not considered necessary. Information regarding the environmental conditions of the property and mandatory State disclosures will be provided by the owner as pertinent. Observations Identification Comments Indications of the present and past uses, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum products No Aboveground storage tanks No Underground storage tanks No Odors No Pools of liquid No Drums and other containers No PCB-containing equipment Yes Pole mounted transformer Fuel sources No Stains No Corrosion of structures and equipment, No Drains and sumps No Pits No Ponds No Lagoons No Stained soil and pavement No Stressed vegetation No Solid waste, trash, construction and demolition debris Yes Various domestic trashes. Mounds and depressions No Waste water, liquid or discharges No Underground injection systems No Streams No Wells No Septic systems No Other No 350 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 10 The owner provided no information relative to recognized environmental conditions associated with the property. The owner is not aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; and any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. No other recognized environmental conditions were indicated by the owner. 7.2 Interview with Site Manager No site manager is associated with the property. 7.3 Interview with Occupants The owners representative (Alan Smith) was contacted via telephone and reported no environmental impact to the site. The property has been used for residential purposes since the 1950’s according to records search and phone discussion with the tenant. 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials Interviews were attempted with state and local government officials to obtain information that may indicate recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property. A reasonable attempt was made to interview staff of the following agencies: • The local fire department (Corona Fire Department) • Riverside County Department of Environmental Health • Riverside County Department of Land Use Services • Riverside County Solid Waste Management • California Regional Water Quality Control Board • City of Corona building permits. No pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was obtained from these agencies. 7.5 Interview with Others No other pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was ascertained from interviews or discussions with others. 351 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 11 8.0 FINDINGS The following recognized environmental conditions were identified: x Asbestos containing materials and/or lead paint may be present within the structure based on the age of construction. This condition should be evaluated by a qualified professional prior to demolition. The following historical environmental conditions were identified: x No historical recognized environmental conditions were identified in addition to the aforementioned issues. The following de minimis conditions were identified, but are not considered recognized environmental conditions for reasons explained below: x Localized domestic trash on-site. 9.0 OPINION In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject site is considered low. Localized domestic trash and organic debris does not constitute a significant environmental impact to the site. The potential for asbestos containing materials and lead paint should be evaluated prior to demolition of the existing residence. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable site conditions are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. No significant data gaps that affected our ability to recognize environmental conditions were encountered. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 for the Property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Section 11.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property with the possible exception of asbestos containing materials and lead paint to be evaluated by others. 352 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 12 No additional recognized environmental conditions were noted through the scope of this study and no further action, other than described above, is considered necessary at this time. 11.0 DEVIATIONS No deletions, deviations, or other limitations to the standard of practice were imposed as part of our assessment. 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES No additional services are recommended at this time with the exception of asbestos and lead paint evaluation to be conducted prior to demolition of the building. 13.0 REREFENCES American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1527-93., pp 1-24 American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Transaction Screen Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1528-93, pp 25-55. ASFE, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments,, Second Edition, 1995 Carson, Scott E. And Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) This Phase I report has been prepared by the undersigned RGS Engineering Geology, Principal Engineering Geologist licensed in the State of Califo rnia. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, RGS Engineering Geology __________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Principal Engineering Geologist 353 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 13 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. The resumes of professionals involved in the collection, analysis, and reporting of environmental data for this report are provided in Appendix 16.9 for review. __________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Principal Engineering Geologist 354 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 14 16.0 APPENDICES 355 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 16.1 Site Location Map 356 357 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 16.2 Site Plan 358 359 360 361 362 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 16.3 Site Photographs 363 364 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 16.4 Historical Research Documentation 365 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: June 11, 2018 5324295.5 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 366 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1994 1"=500'Acquisition Date: June 01, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 03, 1989 USDA 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1985 USDA 1975 1"=500'Flight Date: August 01, 1975 USGS 1966 1"=500'Flight Date: April 16, 1966 USGS 1959 1"=500'Flight Date: October 16, 1959 USDA 1953 1"=500'Flight Date: February 02, 1953 USDA 1949 1"=500'Flight Date: May 21, 1949 USDA 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: May 27, 1938 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/11/18 Arbor Carwash Site Name:Client Name: RGS Geosciences 9744 Arrow Route 1225 Chestnut Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 UPLAND, CA 91784 EDR Inquiry #5324295.5 Contact:Christopher Krall Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5324295 5-page 2 367 5324295.5 2016 = 500'368 5324295.5 2012 = 500'369 5324295.5 2009 = 500'370 5324295.5 2006 = 500'371 5324295.5 1994 = 500'372 5324295.5 1989 = 500'373 5324295.5 1985 = 500'374 5324295.5 1975 = 500'375 5324295.5 1966 = 500'376 5324295.5 1959 = 500'377 5324295.5 1953 = 500'378 5324295.5 1949 = 500'379 5324295.5 1938 = 500'380 &ertiIied 6aQEorQŠ Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 June 07, 2018 5324295.3 381 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results &RQWDFW('5,QTXLU\ Site 1aPe Client Name: Certification # 32 # 3URMeFt 06/07/18 9744 Arrow Route Arbor Carwash RGS Geosciences 1125 Chestnut St Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5324295.3 Upland, CA 91730 Christopher Krall The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by RGS Geosciences were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 2C86-4BBA-BFC0 1702-01 UNMAPPED PROPERTY Arbor Carwash This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 2C86-4BBA-BFC0 RGS Geosciences (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5324295 3 2 382 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 16.5 Regulatory Records Documentation 383 FORM-LBD-DCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: 5324295.2s June 07, 2018 384 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 44 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5324295.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS 385 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 COORDINATES 34.0996540 - 34˚ 5’ 58.75’’Latitude (North): 117.5924900 - 117˚ 35’ 32.96’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 445347.2UTM X (Meters): 3773169.2UTM Y (Meters): 1156 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5620426 GUASTI, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140603Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 386 5324295.2s Page 2 23 FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 5032, 0.953, NW 22 AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET ENVIROSTOR, HIST UST Lower 3601, 0.682, WSW 21 RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 2944, 0.558, North 20 INTER-METRO IND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE ENVIROSTOR, San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 2516, 0.477, West 19 THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2505, 0.474, NNE 18 PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS RCRA-SQG, LUST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, FINDS,... Lower 2263, 0.429, WSW 17 ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 1914, 0.363, East 16 INSPIRON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 911, 0.173, SSW C15 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C14 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C13 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C12 CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST, San Bern. Co.... Lower 367, 0.070, South B11 MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 230, 0.044, WSW B10 HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW EDR Hist Auto Lower 168, 0.032, WSW A9 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 107, 0.020, SSE B8 JOHN R HIX (14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD HIST UST Higher 87, 0.016, West B7 WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV EDR Hist Auto Higher 87, 0.016, West B6 MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 87, 0.016, West B5 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST, San Bern. Co. Permit, Notify 65 Higher 87, 0.016, West B4 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST Higher 87, 0.016, West B3 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-LQG Higher 87, 0.016, West B2 MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE UST Higher 87, 0.016, West A1 EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY #K DRYCLEANERS Lower 60, 0.011, SE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 387 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System 388 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing 389 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EMI Emissions Inventory Data 390 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. 391 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B3 8 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INSPIRON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) 16 23 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there are 6 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.) 17 25 Facility Id: 60002530 Status: Active RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU N 1/2 - 1 (0.558 mi.) 21 37 392 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Facility Id: 60002366 Status: No Further Action FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B NW 1/2 - 1 (0.953 mi.) 23 41 Facility Id: 60002569 Status: Active PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B11 17 Facility Id: 36010022 Status: No Further Action INTER-METRO IND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.477 mi.) 20 35 Facility Id: 71002573 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.682 mi.) 22 40 Facility Id: 71002437 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B4 10 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0607101726 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0607101726 THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) 19 32 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607100225 Global ID: T0607100225 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.429 mi.) 18 27 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed 393 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607100092 Global ID: T0607100092 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B2 8 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Facility Id: 86009049 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.) 17 25 Status: Active Facility Id: 60002530 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites SCH: This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category. depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the. environment they pose. A review of the SCH list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SCH site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B11 17 394 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Facility Id: 36010022 Status: No Further Action Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B6 13 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 39175 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 8858 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 5 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JOHN R HIX (14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B8 15 Facility Id: 00000039175 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C13 21 Facility Id: 00000054010 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C14 22 Facility Id: 00000056788 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C15 22 Facility Id: 00000008858 395 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 2 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B6 13 Facility Id: 36000337 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Facility Id: 36003408 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners’ agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY #K SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) A1 8 Database: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST, Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 2 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) 19 32 Reg Id: 083601836T PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.429 mi.) 18 27 Reg Id: 083600858T 396 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 San Bern. Co. Permit: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division. A review of the San Bern. Co. Permit list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2017 has revealed that there are 2 San Bern. Co. Permit sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 Facility Status: INACTIVE Facility Id: FA0004767 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Facility Status: ACTIVE Facility Id: FA0016208 Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/23/2018 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B7 15 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.032 mi.) B10 16 397 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.) A9 16 398 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 There were no unmapped sites in this report. 399 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV 1 1320 1280 128 0 1 2 4 1 2 4 01240 1 2 0 0 1200 12001160 1160 116011 2 0 11 2 0 1 1 2 0 10 1 0 8010 8 01080 400 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1160 401 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles)< 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 6 NR 3 2 0 1 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 4 NR NR 2 0 2 0.500LUST TC5324295.2s Page 4 402 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles)< 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250SWEEPS UST 5 NR NR NR 0 5 0.250HIST UST 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS TC5324295.2s Page 5 403 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles)< 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET TC5324295.2s Page 6 404 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles)< 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250San Bern. Co. Permit 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 1 NR 0 0 0 1 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CIWQS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 2 NR NR NR NR 2 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 33 0 3 7 1 22 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5324295.2s Page 7 405 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0UTM North: 0UTM East: DRY CLEANING, DRY-TO-DRY NON-VENT, PERCBCAT Description: 000601BCAT Number: Not reportedPermit Status: 909 4819626Representative Telephone: SY KYONG JORepresentative Name: OStatus: Not reportedPermit Number: 304975Application Number: 105454Facility ID: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: 60 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.011 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SE 9755 ARROW HWY #K N/A A1 DRYCLEANERSEXPERT CLEANER S121693635 -117.591658Longitude: 34.101006Latitude: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYPermitting Agency: 86009049Facility ID: UST: 87 ft. Site 1 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A B2 USTMOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 U003784751 cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 800-253-8054Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: JOHN HOOVERContact: LAKEWOOD, CO 80228 12265 WEST BAYAUD AVEMailing address: CAL000050535EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730-3662 8477 ARCHIBALD AVEFacility address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454Facility name: 03/07/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 87 ft. Site 2 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE CAL000050535 B3 RCRA-LQGEXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 1007200051 TC5324295.2s Page 8 406 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/24/2002Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FAIRFAX, VA 22937 3225 GALLOWS RDOwner/operator address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/24/2002Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued)1007200051 TC5324295.2s Page 9 407 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPSite name: 02/28/2002Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued)1007200051 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/5/2001Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 2/20/2001Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 2/20/2001How Stopped Date: T0607101726Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 2001012Local Case Num: Not reportedCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 87 ft. Site 3 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A B4 LUSTMOBIL #18 -AJ6 S105774326 TC5324295.2s Page 10 408 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: JC3Staff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S105774326 T0607101726Global Id: LUST: 9513206375Phone Number: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0607101726Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: jcrutsinger@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: JACKSON CRUTSINGERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607101726Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 2001012Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: JCCase Worker: 11/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.593008Longitude: 34.099656Latitude: T0607101726Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607101726Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: 87 ft. Site 4 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 Notify 65RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West San Bern. Co. Permit8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A B5 LUSTMOBIL #18 -AJ6 S100179548 TC5324295.2s Page 11 409 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011877Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: SPECIAL GENERATORPermit Category: PT0002341Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER 0-10 EMPLOYEES (W/GEN PRMT)Permit Category: PT0002345Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER - UST ONLYPermit Category: PT0002338Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: 11/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607101726Global Id: 02/20/2001Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607101726Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 03/02/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0607101726Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 02/20/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0607101726Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 02/20/2001Date: OtherAction Type: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S100179548 TC5324295.2s Page 12 410 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedIncident Description: Not reportedIssue Date: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: NOTIFY 65: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011879Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011878Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S100179548 334Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 333Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 87 ft. Site 5 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West CA FID UST8477 ARCHIBALD N/A B6 SWEEPS USTMOBIL OIL S101590945 TC5324295.2s Page 13 411 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8477 ARCHIBALDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00039175Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36000337Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 336Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 335Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 8000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000002SWRCB Tank Id: MOBIL OIL (Continued)S101590945 TC5324295.2s Page 14 412 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: MOBIL OIL (Continued)S101590945 Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts2001 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts2000 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1999 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1998 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1997 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1996 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Gasoline Service Stations1993 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1992 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1991 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1988 WENTLAND MOBILE Gasoline Service Stations1987 WENTLAND MOBILE Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 87 ft. Site 6 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AV N/A B7 EDR Hist AutoWENTLAND MOBILE 1020706997 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0333Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Owner City,St,Zip: 612 SOUTH FLOWER STREETOwner Address: MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner Name: 7149808440Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000039175Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002A273.pdfURL: 0002A273File Number: HIST UST: 87 ft. Site 7 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD N/A B8 HIST USTJOHN R HIX (14-313)U001569289 TC5324295.2s Page 15 413 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0336Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0335Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0334Container Num: JOHN R HIX (14-313) (Continued)U001569289 Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2003 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2002 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2001 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2000 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Cleaner 107 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.020 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1153 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SSE 9755 ARROW RTE N/A A9 EDR Hist CleanerCALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING 1019947310 Gasoline Service Stations1973 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1972 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1971 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1970 BARRENA MARTIN Gasoline Service Stations1969 BARRENA MARTIN Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 168 ft. Site 8 of 9 in cluster B 0.032 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW 9710 ARROW N/A B10 EDR Hist AutoHERNANDEZ JOHN R 1020427704 TC5324295.2s Page 16 414 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gasoline Service Stations1980 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1979 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1978 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1977 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1976 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1974 HERNANDEZ JOHN R HERNANDEZ JOHN R (Continued)1020427704 Not reportedComments: 11/02/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 36010022Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404252Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTRAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO CO. SUPT. OF SCHOOLSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTERAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30004-NO 30006-NO 30007-NO 30008-NO 30013-NOConfirmed COC: Chlordane DDD DDE DDT LeadPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.5918Longitude: 34.0999Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 23Senate: 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 6.27Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404252Site Code: 04/19/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 36010022Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 230 ft. Site 9 of 9 in cluster B 0.044 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW SCHARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARROW ROUTE N/A B11 ENVIROSTORMULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER S107736794 TC5324295.2s Page 17 415 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOILPotential Description: 30004-NO, 30006-NO, 30007-NO, 30008-NO, 30013-NOConfirmed COC: Chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT, LeadPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.5918Longitude: 34.0999Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/19/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 23Senate: 40Assembly: 404252Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 6.27Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 36010022Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued)S107736794 TC5324295.2s Page 18 416 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/02/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 36010022Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404252Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTRAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO CO. SUPT. OF SCHOOLSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTERAlias Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued)S107736794 09-10-91Referral Date: 44-020130Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 8858Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 367 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C 0.070 mi.San Bern. Co. Permit Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South HIST UST8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C12 SWEEPS USTCHINO BASIN MWD S101618860 TC5324295.2s Page 19 417 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00029BF0.pdfURL: 00029BF0File Number: HIST UST: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-28-88Active Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-008858-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 3Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 09-10-91Action Date: CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued)S101618860 TC5324295.2s Page 20 418 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/30/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1-3 CHEMICALS SPECIALPermit Category: PT0036191Permit Number: Verizon WirelessOwner: FA0016208Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00054010Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36003408Facility ID: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00008858Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36003408Facility ID: CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued)S101618860 OtherFacility Type: 00000054010Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C13 HIST USTCHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI U001569274 TC5324295.2s Page 21 419 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00050000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUEOwner Address: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DIOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: D. PETERSContact Name: PUBLIC AGENCYOther Type: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI (Continued)U001569274 Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 5Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUEOwner Address: CHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICTOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: D. PETERSContact Name: PUBLIC AGENCYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056788Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C14 HIST USTCHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICT U001569275 STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C15 HIST USTMAIN OFFICE U001569296 TC5324295.2s Page 22 420 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: NUMBER 2Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: NUMBER 1.Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: NUMBER 3Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE.Owner Address: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DIOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: JERALD C. ROGERSContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000008858Facility ID: MAIN OFFICE (Continued)U001569296 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ARCHIBALD AVEMailing address: CAD107724254EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8600 ARCHIBALD AVEFacility address: INSPIRON CORPFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 911 ft. 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1138 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHORANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SSW FINDS8600 ARCHIBALD AVE CAD107724254 16 RCRA-SQGINSPIRON CORP 1000347777 TC5324295.2s Page 23 421 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110002667123Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: OMNICARE, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: INSPIRON CORP (Continued)1000347777 TC5324295.2s Page 24 422 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002667123DFR URL: 110002667123Registry ID: 1000347777Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System INSPIRON CORP (Continued)1000347777 Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002530Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401793Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 0208-321-32-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 0208-321-32-0000APN: -117.5854Longitude: 34.09996Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Amit PathakProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.19Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401793Site Code: 08/15/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60002530Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1914 ft. 0.363 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1159 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 East VCP10060-10080 ARROW ROUTE N/A 17 ENVIROSTORALLMARK PLAZA S121475143 TC5324295.2s Page 25 423 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Signed and sent a copy to the RP.Comments: 11/13/2017Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002530Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401793Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 0208-321-32-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 0208-321-32-0000APN: 34.09996 / -117.5854Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/15/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401793Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Amit PathakProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2.19Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002530Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/23/2018Schedule Due Date: Removal Action WorkplanSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Signed and sent a copy to the RP.Comments: 11/13/2017Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued)S121475143 TC5324295.2s Page 26 424 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/23/2018Schedule Due Date: Removal Action WorkplanSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued)S121475143 NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: PNEU DRAULICSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-980-5366Contact telephone: USContact country: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8575 HELMSContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD981370810EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8575 HELMSFacility address: PNEU DRAULICS INCFacility name: 01/24/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: CIWQS San Bern. Co. Permit HIST CORTESE ECHO 2263 ft.FINDS 0.429 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Lower Actual: 1141 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW LUST8575 HELMS CAD981370810 18 RCRA-SQGPNEU DRAULICS INC 1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 27 425 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0607100092Global Id: 9093868419Phone Number: crichards@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: CATHERINE RICHARDSContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 87031Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: 083600858TRB Case Number: CR2Case Worker: 05/23/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.598866Longitude: 34.097785Latitude: T0607100092Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100092Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 28 426 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CLOSEnf Type: 9TH STREETCross Street: ETITAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 87031Local Case Num: 083600858TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 05/23/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607100092Global Id: 05/10/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0607100092Global Id: 03/31/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 03/31/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Not reportedAction: 03/31/1988Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/23/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/31/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 29 427 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-009068-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 09-21-88Created Date: 09-10-91Action Date: 09-10-91Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 9068Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: UPPER SANTA ANA VALLHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: CR2Staff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.5997403Longitude: 34.0978012Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: YesInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 5/10/1988Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 5/10/1988Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/23/1997Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/31/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 5/10/1988Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0607100092Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 30 428 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002683953DFR URL: 110002683953Registry ID: 1000423885Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002683953Registry ID: FINDS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8575 HELMSMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36000278Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: UNKNOWNContent: PSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 09-21-88Active Date: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 31 429 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 06/29/2010Termination Date: 05/27/2008Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 36C352003WDID: 99-08DWOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: 8575 Helms Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730Agency Address: Pneudraulics IncAgency: CIWQS: 05/31/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 11-30 CHEMICALSPermit Category: PT0002352Permit Number: PNEUDRAULICS INCOwner: FA0005354Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 05/31/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORPermit Category: PT0002353Permit Number: PNEUDRAULICS INCOwner: FA0005354Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: 083600858TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 36Facility County Code: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 T0607100225Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100225Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: 2505 ft. 0.474 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1208 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 NNE HIST CORTESE9888 FOOTHILL BLVD N/A 19 LUSTTHRIFTY OIL #320 S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 32 430 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/06/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 04/24/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/30/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/06/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/06/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: 9093868419Phone Number: crichards@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: CATHERINE RICHARDSContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100225Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 91001Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: 083601836TRB Case Number: CR2Case Worker: 05/06/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.589509Longitude: 34.106933Latitude: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 33 431 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.5893911Longitude: 34.106796Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: NoInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 4/15/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 1/30/1991Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/6/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/6/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 4/15/1991Enter Date: 1/30/1991How Stopped Date: T0607100225Global ID: Other SourceLeak Source: OverfillLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Subsurface MonitoringHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: RAMONACross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 91001Local Case Num: 083601836TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 05/06/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607100225Global Id: 01/30/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0607100225Global Id: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 34 432 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083601836TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 36Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: UPPER SANTA ANA VALLHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: CR2Staff Initials: CABStaff: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002573Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000477573Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD076053701Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6291Longitude: 34.09940Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 25Senate: 41Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002573Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2516 ft. 0.477 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1143 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West San Bern. Co. Permit9393 ARROW RTE N/A 20 ENVIROSTORINTER-METRO IND CORP S110493943 TC5324295.2s Page 35 433 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER 51-100 EMPLOYEES (W/GEN PRMT)Permit Category: PT0001581Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: CA ANNUAL FEEPermit Category: PT0001580Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR - 51-100 EMPLOYEESPermit Category: PT0001582Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: EPCRA FACILITYPermit Category: PT0014569Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: INTER-METRO IND CORP (Continued)S110493943 TC5324295.2s Page 36 434 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002366Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401749Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-77-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-76-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-75-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-74-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-73-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-72-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-70-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-69-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-68-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000,APN: -117.5925Longitude: 34.10801Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 3.38Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401749Site Code: 10/23/2017Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 60002366Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2944 ft. 0.558 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1224 ft. 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 North VCP8013 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A 21 ENVIROSTORRC PLAZA S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 37 435 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Further ActionStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401749Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 3.38Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002366Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16.Comments: 09/13/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination.Comments: 10/19/2017Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/03/2017Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Mailed annual cost estimate letter.Comments: 09/07/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement.Comments: 07/07/2016Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 38 436 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination.Comments: 10/19/2017Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/03/2017Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Mailed annual cost estimate letter.Comments: 09/07/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement.Comments: 07/07/2016Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002366Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401749Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-77-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-76-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-75-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-74-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-73-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-72-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-70-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-69-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-68-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000,APN: 34.10801 / -117.5925Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/23/2017Status Date: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 39 437 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16.Comments: 09/13/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002437Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD050745363Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6038Longitude: 34.09663Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 23Senate: 40Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002437Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3601 ft. 0.682 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1123 ft. 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW HIST UST9292 NINTH STREET N/A 22 ENVIROSTORAVERY DENNISON-MPD S110493657 TC5324295.2s Page 40 438 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002999E.pdfURL: 0002999EFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: AVERY DENNISON-MPD (Continued)S110493657 Robert SengaSupervisor: Anantaramam PeddadaProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1.06Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401800Site Code: 10/20/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60002569Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 5032 ft. 0.953 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1219 ft. 1/2-1 RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 NW VCP9116 EAST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE 102 N/A 23 ENVIROSTORFORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 41 439 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401800Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Anantaramam PeddadaProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1.06Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002569Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 05/02/2018Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site ScreeningFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/16/2018Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002569Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401800Alias Name: SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEConfirmed COC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6063Longitude: 34.10765Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued)S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 42 440 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 05/02/2018Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site ScreeningFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/16/2018Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002569Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401800Alias Name: SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: 30022Confirmed COC: 30022Potential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 34.10765 / -117.6063Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/20/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued)S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 43 441 ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) Count: 0 records. NO SITES FOUND TC5324295.2s Page 44 442 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5324295.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 443 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5324295.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 444 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 445 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 02/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 446 Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5324295.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 447 LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC5324295.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 448 Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 449 INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 450 SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 451 SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. TC5324295.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 452 Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 453 INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 134 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 454 INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC5324295.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 455 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 456 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC5324295.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 457 Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 04/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records TC5324295.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 458 LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 01/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 02/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 459 LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. TC5324295.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 460 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. TC5324295.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 461 Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans TC5324295.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 462 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 463 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC5324295.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 464 Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC5324295.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 465 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC5324295.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 466 Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 467 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5324295.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 468 CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 04/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: DRYCLEAN AVAQMD A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. TC5324295.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 469 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 147 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. TC5324295.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 470 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. TC5324295.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 471 Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 472 MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: WELL SAMP PROJ (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 473 CIWQS: The California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC5324295.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 474 Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 475 CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 01/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 476 CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 01/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 477 CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 478 CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. TC5324295.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 479 Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 480 CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. TC5324295.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 481 Date of Government Version: 02/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 02/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 01/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 482 Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 483 Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. TC5324295.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 484 Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 485 Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 486 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 487 CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 12/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. TC5324295.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 488 Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 12/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 489 OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 490 Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 TC5324295.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 491 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5324295.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING 492 TC5324295.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5620426 GUASTI, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 1156 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3773169.2UTM Y (Meters): 445347.2UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.59249 - 117˚ 35’ 32.96’’Longitude (West): 34.099654 - 34˚ 5’ 58.75’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 9744 ARROW ROUTE ARBOR CARWASH TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® 493 TC5324295.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 1156 ft. North South West East10621071108310941102111311231133114411561167118111931207122012361250126712831170116311571152115211521154115711561156115611521157115811521162116311621163General SouthGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 494 TC5324295.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapGUASTI NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8629H FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8628J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8630J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 495 TC5324295.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 496 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles 497 TC5324295.2s Page A-6 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HanfordSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam59 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HANFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 498 TC5324295.2s Page A-7 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000140834 4 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40000140837 2 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam59 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 499 TC5324295.2s Page A-8 1/2 - 1 Mile SE1071 3 1/2 - 1 Mile South3149 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® 500 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.144014 0 0 13601 3 601320 1320 1 3201 2 8 0 1280 1280 801 2 4 0 1 2 4 01240 1 2 0 0 1200 12001 1 6 0 1160 116011 2 0 1 1 20 1 1 20 112 0 1080 1 0 8010 8 01080 1 0 4 0 1 040 1040 CA 501 TC5324295.2s Page A-10 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:05-MAR-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: CUCAMONGAArea Served: 34398Connections:128000Pop Served: CUCAMONGA 91730 P O BOX 638 Organization That Operates System: CUCAMONGA CWDSystem Name: 3610018System Number: WELL 30Source Name: UndefinedPrecision:340525.0 1173530.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNTStation Type:13District Number: San BeernardinoCounty:3610018037FRDS Number: TANUser ID:036/018-005Prime Station Code: Water System Information: 1 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 3149CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 502 TC5324295.2s Page A-11 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:06-AUG-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 39. MG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.3 UG/LFindings:16-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 41. MG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.7 UG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 503 TC5324295.2s Page A-12 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: DIBROMOCHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)Chemical: 0.22 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.6 UG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:13-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 18. MG/LFindings:05-NOV-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:15-OCT-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:01-OCT-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:18-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:10-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:04-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:28-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:20-AUG-12Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 504 TC5324295.2s Page A-13 PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.4 UG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:07-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:31-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 30. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 42. MG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:11-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:11-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:28-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:21-OCT-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 505 TC5324295.2s Page A-14 ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Findings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 410. USFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23. MG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 19. MG/LFindings:10-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:02-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28. MG/LFindings:19-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:01-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 39. MG/LFindings:01-MAY-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 506 TC5324295.2s Page A-15 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:21-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 7800. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 270. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: VANADIUMChemical: 16. UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.21 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 20. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 8.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 24. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 9.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 48. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 507 TC5324295.2s Page A-16 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:08-DEC-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:20-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 26. MG/LFindings:16-SEP-14Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 4.6 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 508 TC5324295.2s Page A-17 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:11-MAY-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 18. MG/LFindings:04-MAY-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23. MG/LFindings:29-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21. MG/LFindings:20-APR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:13-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:13-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:06-APR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:30-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 25. MG/LFindings:30-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5. UG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 509 TC5324295.2s Page A-18 PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.5 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:31-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:31-AUG-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:24-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 19. MG/LFindings:18-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:11-AUG-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:03-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:03-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 16. MG/LFindings:27-JUL-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:20-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:20-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 16. MG/LFindings:13-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:07-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:29-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6. UG/LFindings:22-JUN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:08-JUN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:01-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5. UG/LFindings:11-MAY-15Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 510 TC5324295.2s Page A-19 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.7 MG/LFindings:01-FEB-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:12-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:12-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:21-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:21-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:07-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:07-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:30-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:30-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:23-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:16-NOV-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:09-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:09-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:26-OCT-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:19-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:19-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 14. MG/LFindings:14-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 14. MG/LFindings:28-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:21-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:21-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:14-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:14-SEP-15Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 511 TC5324295.2s Page A-20 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.8 MG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.1 MG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6. UG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.6 MG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.8 MG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.8 UG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 9.3 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.6 UG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.9 MG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:07-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:07-MAR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:29-FEB-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:29-FEB-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:01-FEB-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 512 TC5324295.2s Page A-21 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.3 MG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:27-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.5 MG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.5 UG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.2 MG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.4 MG/LFindings:22-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:15-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:08-AUG-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.5 UG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.6 MG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:26-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.7 MG/LFindings:18-JUL-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 513 TC5324295.2s Page A-22 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 9.9 MG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:20-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:20-MAR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.2 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:14-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:07-NOV-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.6 MG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 514 TC5324295.2s Page A-23 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.2 MG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220. MG/LFindings:02-AUG-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.6 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:03-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.3 UG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 515 TC5324295.2s Page A-24 CUCAMONGAArea Served: 34398Connections:128000Pop Served: CUCAMONGA 91730 P O BOX 638 Organization That Operates System: CUCAMONGA CWDSystem Name: 3610018System Number: WELL 05Source Name: 100 Feet (one Second)Precision:340525.0 1173500.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNTStation Type:13District Number: San BeernardinoCounty:3610018025FRDS Number: TANUser ID:01S/07W-14G01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 3 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 1071CA WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.5925527Longitude: 34.0880661Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070203Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 001S007W14E001SMonloc name: USGS-340517117353001Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 2 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000140837FED USGS PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 516 TC5324295.2s Page A-25 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-DEC-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:27-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.3 MG/LFindings:20-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:16-SEP-14Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 3.4 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:02-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1 MG/LFindings:25-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:18-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.8 MG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.9 MG/LFindings:21-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1200. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 517 TC5324295.2s Page A-26 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4 MG/LFindings:31-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:24-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:16-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:02-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:18-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:13-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4 MG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:14-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:10-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.6 MG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.8 MG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.7 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 518 TC5324295.2s Page A-27 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:07-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:27-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:15-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:08-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:18-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:15-JUN-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 519 TC5324295.2s Page A-28 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:10-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:03-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:27-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:30-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:23-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:27-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:19-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:12-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:05-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:30-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:14-NOV-16Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 520 TC5324295.2s Page A-29 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: VANADIUMChemical: 24. UG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 3.5 UG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.15 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 12. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 3.9 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 2.1 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 22. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 7.4 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 37. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 120. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 180. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.1Findings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 300. USFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 521 TC5324295.2s Page A-30 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:14-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:05-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:27-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.6 MG/LFindings:21-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:13-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:25-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:16-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:09-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:08-JAN-18Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:18-DEC-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:06-NOV-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:30-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:23-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:09-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:05-SEP-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:02-AUG-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:31-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 522 TC5324295.2s Page A-31 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:28-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:20-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:06-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:16-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:09-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:27-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.7 MG/LFindings:19-MAR-12Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 523 TC5324295.2s Page A-32 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:25-FEB-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:12-FEB-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:21-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:14-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:07-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:31-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.5 MG/LFindings:26-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.3 MG/LFindings:20-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:10-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:04-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:26-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.1 MG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:13-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.7 MG/LFindings:05-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:22-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:15-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:18-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:10-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:04-SEP-12Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 524 TC5324295.2s Page A-33 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:03-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:26-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:19-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:05-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:29-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:09-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:24-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:17-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:03-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:29-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:15-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:06-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:29-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:22-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:16-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:25-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:18-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:11-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:04-MAR-13Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 525 TC5324295.2s Page A-34 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:24-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:18-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:10-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:03-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:27-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:20-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7. MG/LFindings:23-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.8 MG/LFindings:16-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:09-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:25-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:18-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:21-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:30-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:23-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:16-SEP-13Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 526 TC5324295.2s Page A-35 BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Findings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 320. USFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:10-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:02-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:19-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.9 MG/LFindings:29-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:14-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:07-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:31-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:10-MAR-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 527 TC5324295.2s Page A-36 Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.5836636Longitude: 34.0877884Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070203Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 001S007W14G001SMonloc name: USGS-340516117345801Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 4 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000140834FED USGS VANADIUMChemical: 18. UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.29 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 12. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 19. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 8.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 40. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 130. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® 528 TC5324295.2s Page A-37 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%2.400 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 1 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 91730 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for SAN BERNARDINO County: 2 03491730 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® 529 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 530 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 531 OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED 532 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 16.6 Interview Documentation 533 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 No interviews were conducted due to the open and vacant nature of the property. 534 RGS Engineering Geology Page 8 16.8 Resume 535 RGS Engineering Geology Page 9 CHRISTOPHER M. KRALL P.G, C.E.G., REA POSITION: Principal Engineering Geologist EDUCATION: B.S., Geology, University of Redlands, Redlands, California, 1985 Special Studies in Environmental Waste Management, University of California, Riverside Extension Program, Cal-OSHA Safety Training Program for Hazardous Waste Workers, Trench Excavation Safety EXPERIENCE: Mr. Krall has performed numerous preliminary geotechnical investigations throughout southern California. He has conducted fault investigations along the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Elsinore-Whittier, Willard, Wildomar, Murrieta Hot Springs, Cucamonga, Casa Loma and Park Hills fault zones. Mr. Krall is experienced in percolation testing, geologic field mapping, subsurface explorations, aerial photo interpretations, seismic refraction surveys, laboratory testing and report preparations. In various localities, these studies have involved evaluation of slope stability, landslides, fault zones, seismicity, liquefaction, ground water conditions, grading requirements and other geologic conditions. Mr. Krall has served as the Project Manager for Assessment District 159 and 161 improvements in the Temecula area of Riverside County, California. Mr. Krall has gained extensive practical experience on transportation related projects through his participation in a variety of highway and road improvement projects on major San Bernardino and Riverside County Highways. He has been involved in geotechnical investigations on five major highway projects in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties including: Highway 74/Ortega Highway; Highway 178/San Bernardino County; Interstate 10/San Bernardino County; Route 91/Riverside County; and Highway 60/Riverside County. Mr. Krall is knowledgeable and experienced in working with highway operating right-of-ways, encroachment permits and lane closure procedures, in accordance with Caltrans standards. Additionally, Mr. Krall has been involved in the preparation of Materials reports following Caltrans Test 130 procedures. ASSOCIATIONS/AFFILIATIONS: Member - Inland Geologic Society Member - Geologic Society of America Member - Association of Engineering Geologist REGISTRATIONS: Registered Geologist - State of California Certified Engineering Geologist - State of California Registered Environmental Assessor - State of California Certified Concrete Technician - American Concrete Institute 536 Appendix ' 5RaGZay CRnstruFtiRn 1Rise 0RGelinJ 'ata 537 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 538 file:///P|/...%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 539 file:///P|/...%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 540 file:///P|/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Paving **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 360.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 61.7 57.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 60.1 57.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 541 file:///P|/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 205.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 66.5 62.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 65.0 62.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 542 file:///P|/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 543 file:///P|/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 544 file:///P|/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Demolition **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 72.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.4 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 545 file:///P|/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 77.3 70.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.3 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 546 file:///P|/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Construction **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 360.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 63.4 55.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 56.9 52.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 547 file:///P|/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 205.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 68.3 60.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 61.7 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 548 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Arch Coatings **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- 549 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 550 file:///P|/...ss%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Faimly Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 551 file:///P|/...ss%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 552 file:///P|/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Paving **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 146.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 69.5 65.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 67.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 70.7 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 553 file:///P|/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 308.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 63.0 59.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 61.4 58.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 64.2 57.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 554 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Grading **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.0 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 555 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 556 file:///P|/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Construction **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 71.2 63.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 71.3 68.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 64.7 60.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 557 file:///P|/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 64.8 56.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 64.8 61.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 58.2 54.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 558 file:///P|/...ess%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Arch Coatings **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- 559 file:///P|/...ess%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 61.9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 61.9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 560 Appendix ( 1Rise StuGy 561 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 562 42428 Chisolm Trail, Murrieta CA 92562 phone 760-473-1253 www.ldnconsulting.net fax 760-689-4943 10/8/18 - 1 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise October 8, 2018 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 12549 Overland Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Subject: The Arbor Carwash Facility Operational Noise Assessment in the City of Rancho Cucamonga CA Ldn Consulting is pleased to submit the following noise impact analysis for the proposed Arbors Carwash Project (project). The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate operational noise levels from the proposed car wash, and central vacuum equipment. The calculated noise levels have been propagated to the nearest potential habitat using the logarithmic relationship describing the acoustical spreading or drop off rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance from the source. The propagated noise levels are then compared to the applicable City standards. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The project consists of a carwash facility and is proposing a drive thru carwash building. The project site is located at 9744 Arrow Route in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. The proposed project site vicinity map is provided in Figure 1. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and across Arrow Route, a school use to the north and a residential property to the east. It should be noted: the residential property to the east is looking to rezone that property to commercial. The proposed site configuration can be seen in Figure 2. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS Section 17.66.050 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s municipal code regulates exterior noise levels. The noise ordinance provides Noise Standards relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. 563 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 2 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map 564 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 3 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan 565 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 4 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Existing Setting Noise level measurements were conducted between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on “slow” response and “A-weighting.” The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 1 provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Attachment A. The Measurement location is shown in Figure 3. Table 1: Summary of Noise Level Measurements ID Location Description Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmin Lmax 1 Central of site at northern property line – set back from roadways 63.4 37.1 90.8 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Proposed Carwash and Central Vacuum The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system, the manufacturer’s noise specification is provided in Attachment B. The carwash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north. The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3. The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The manufacturer’s noise specification is provided in Attachment B. The modeling includes an 8-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. The location of the central vacuum is shown in Figure 3. Proposed HVAC Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA as can be seen in Attachment B. 566 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 5 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 3 Proposed Site Configuration 567 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 6 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Operational Noise Modeling Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SoundPLAN Essential, version 4.1, a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package (NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO Standard 9613-2, “Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data. The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impacts, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time. Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver. Acoustically hard sites include surfaces, such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off site uses are considered acoustically soft, or absorptive, therefore, an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 2. Elevations were taken from the project plans. Table 2: Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) Noise Source Number of Sources Reference Sound Power Level1 Carwash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 3 80.0 1 Reference Noise Level provided in Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific points are shown in Table 3. The results of the noise modeling along with the receiver locations are shown are shown in Figure 4 for the unmitigated scenario. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, noise levels would not exceed the City’s standards for adjacent properties. Therefore, no noise abatement measure is required to comply with City standards. 568 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 7 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Table 3: Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Receiver Without Mitigation R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 FINDINGS Operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at adjacent properties with the following design features: 1. The carwash dryer system shall not to exceed 82.5 dBA unmitigated noise level at 5 feet and shall be set back within the carwash tunnel approximately eight feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. 2. All carwash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, and vacuum motor and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. 3. In order to meet daytime noise limits as defined in the Escondido Noise Ordinance, the carwash must cease operating no later than 10:00 p.m. No noise abatement measures are required or recommended. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (760) 473-1253. Sincerely, Ldn Consulting, Inc. Jeremy Louden, Principal ATTACHMENTS A – Measurement Data B – Sound Reference Data 569 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 8 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 4 Unmitigated Noise Level Contours 570 General Information Serial Number 21733 Model 703+ User Job Description Location Start Time Stop Time Run Time Pre Calibration Post Calibration Calibration Deviation Sample Interval Wednesday, 9 May 2018 12:00:14 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 13:30:14 01:30:00   60 Sec. Note Results Dose 4 Dose 1.3 % Projected Dose 6.9 % Leq 63.4 dBA TWA 63.4 dBA TWA (8)56.1 dBA Lmax 90.8 dBA Lpeak (max)122.8 dB SEA 125.8 dB Lmin 37.1 dBA Lep (8)56.1 dBA SE 0.0 Pa²hr Overload? Yes Statistics L10 60.0 dBA L30 56.5 dBA L50 54.5 dBA L70 53.0 dBA L90 51.0 dBA Settings Exchange Rate 3 Threshold 0 dBA Criterion Level 75 dBA Criterion Duration 8 hours RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight Unweighted Detector Slow Gain 30 dB Attachment A: Ambient Noise Levels 571 Measurement Results The results of all measurements, in the form of print-outs directly from the sound level meter, can be found following this report. All measurements were taken as 15-second averages. For clarity, the results of the Vs-octave band measurements are listed below. For comparison, I have included the test results from our measurements taken on your original blower ( 1 motor configuration) in 1998: · '13-0ctave Band Sound Pressure Levels, in decibels (dB) Ce~r F~Q!.l!,m~ S feel U:Qm f!lg~~~ 20 &;t f.rgm Bl12wm 5 f..eel fr.ow. 11.l,i.w~r (~ mg12r s~tem} (4 m2tsu: mtem) (l (!l.OIQ(. -1228 tU.lJ 25 76.1 70.2 67.3 31.5 76.6 71.9 71.4 40 76.8 72.0 75 .5 50 78.4 74.2 79.3 63 77.8 72.8 85.3 80 77.3 74.8 81 .9 100 78.1 74.0 83.7 125 80.0 73.7 83.3 160 75.9 73.8 86.4 200 77.0 73.9 85.9 250 81.7 73.7 88.5 315 79.3 75 .0 90.5 400 83.6 80.5 97.0 500 76.9 73.7 96.2 630 67.0 70.8 96.5 800 67.l 63.7 89.7 1,000 66.4 64.9 88.5 1,250 64.5 64.5 84.7 1,600 65.8 63 .7 82.4 2,000 64.S 61.5 83.0 2,500 61.4 59 .4 80,3 3,150 61.S 58 .3 78.5 4,000 S9.5 56.8 76.4 5,000 57.9 54 .l 74.0 6,300 54.5 49 .9 72.5 8,000 51.3 48.8 70.6 10,000 49.6 44.S 68.9 12,500 47.2 42.2 67.1 16,000 44.9 38.4 64.3 20,000 38.9 32.8 59.9 Overall (sum): 90.5 dB 86.4 dB 103.0 dB A-Weighted: 82.5 dBA 79.4dBA 99.8 dBA. Please note that even though the data are listed to the nearest 0.1 decibel, accuracy beyond the nearest whole decibel should not be expected. Attachment B: Dryer Blowers Noise Levels 572 SOUND LEVEL METER READINGS MODEL: FT-DD-T460HP3 (60HP TURBINE VACUUM PRODUCER) READING ONE: 72 DB-A, 10 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING TWO: 65 DB-A, 20 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING THREE: 59 DB-A, 30 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. SOUND LEVEL METER USED: SIMPSON MODEL #40003 – MSHA APPROVED. MEETS OSHA & WALSH-HEALY REQUIREMENTS FOR NOISE CONTROL. CONFORMS TO ANSI S1.4-1983, IEC 651 SPECS FOR METER TYPE. NOTE: THESE READINGS WERE TAKEN OUTSIDE ON CONCRETE SLAB NO ENCLOSURE. Vacutech 1350 Hi-Tech Drive, Sheridan WY, 82801 PHONE: (800) 917-9444 FAX: (303) 675-1988 EMAIL: info@vacutechllc WEB SITE: vacutechllc.com Attachment B: Central Vacuum Noise Levels 573 Three Phase 4TTA3 2½ – 5 Tons Split System Cooling Product Data PUB. NO. 22-1791-14-EN Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels 574 © 2016 Trane 2 22-1791-14-EN Features and Benefits • All aluminum Spine Fin™ coil • WeatherGuard™ fasteners • Quick-Sess™ cabinet, service access and refrigerant connections with full coil protection • DuraTuff™ base, fast complete drain, weatherproof • Comfort “R”™ mode approved • Glossy corrosion resistant finish • Internal compressor high/low pressure and temperature protection • Liquid line filter-drier • Polyslate gray cabinet with anthracite gray badge and cap • R-410A refrigerant • Low Pressure Switch • High Pressure Switch • Compressor Sump Heat • S.E.E.T. design testing • 100% line run test • Low ambient cooling to 55°F as shipped • Low ambient cooling to 30°F with AY28X079 • Low ambient cooling to 0°F with BAYLOAM103 • Extended warranties available Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels 575 22-1791-14-EN 3 Contents Features and Benefits 2 General Data 4 Product Specifications 4 A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] 4 Accessory Description and Usage 5 AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions 5 Model Nomenclature 7 Electrical Data 8 Dimensions 12 Mechanical Specification Options 14 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels 576 4 22-1791-14-EN A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] MODEL SOUND POWER LEVEL [dB(A)] A_WEIGHTED FULL OVTAVE SOUND POWER LEVEL dB - [dB(A)] 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 4TTA3030A3/4 78 49 60.2 66 70.3 71.4 69.8 60.4 53 4TTA3036B3/4 78 45.5 58.7 63.1 69.7 70 68.1 59 49.8 4TTA3042D3/4 79 47.5 64.5 67 75.3 74 70.7 62.2 52.8 4TTA3048D3/4 79 47.4 60 66.9 75.3 73.5 70.3 62 51.4 4TTA3060D3/4 80 47.3 55.7 69 72.7 75.8 69.4 62.2 53.3 Note: Rated in accordance with AHRI Stnadard 270-2008 General Data Product Specifications Model No. 1 4TTA3030A3 4TTA3030A4 4TTA3036B3 4TTA3036B4 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz 2 200/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 10 5 14 8 Max Fuse Size (Amps)15 15 20 15 Compressor RECIP RECIP SCROLL SCROLL RL Amps - LR Amps 7.4 - 54.9 3.7 - 28 10.4 - 73 5.8 - 38 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 0.7 0.4 0.56 0.4 Fan HP 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 Fan Dia (inches)23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Coil Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™ Refrigerant R-410A 5/11-LB/OZ 5/11-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ Line Size - (in.) O.D. Gas 3 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 Line Size - (in.) O.D. Liquid 3 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec. Subcooling 10°10°10°10° Dimensions H x W x D (Crated)38 x 30.1 x 33 38 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 Weight - Shipping 224 222 176 176 Weight - Net 197 195 149 149 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: 4 Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs - Base & Cap 4" High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs - 4" Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset 5 TAYREFLN2* TAYREFLN2* TAYREFLN7* TAYREFLN7* 1 Certified in accordance with the Unitary Air-Conditioner equipment certification program which is based on AHRI Standard 210/240. 2 Calculated in accordance with N.E.C. Only use HACR circuit breakers or fuses. 3 Standard line lengths - 60'. Standard lift - 60' Suction and Liquid line. For greater lengths and lifts refer to refrigerant piping software Pub# 32-3312-0†. (†denotes latest revision) 4 For accessory description and usage, see page 5. 5 * = 15, 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 foot lineset available. Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels 577 22-1791-14-EN 5 General Data AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions AHRI STANDARD 210/240 RATING CONDITIONS — (A) Cooling 80°F DB, 67°F WB air entering indoor coil, 95°F DB air entering outdoor coil. (B) High Temperature Heating 47°F DB, 43°F WB air entering outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. (C) Low Temperature Heating 17°F DB, 15°F WB air entering outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. (D) Rated indoor airflow for heating is the same as for cooling. AHRI STANDARD 270 RATING CONDITIONS — (Noise rating numbers are determined with the unit in cooling operation.) Standard Noise Rating number is at 95°F outdoor air. Accessory Description and Usage Anti-Short Cycle Timer — Solid state timing device that prevents compressor recycling until five (5) minutes have elapsed after satisfying call or power interruptions. Use in area with questionable power delivery, commercial applications, long lineset, etc. Evaporator Defrost Control — SPST Temperature actuated switch that cycles the condenser off as indoor coil reaches freeze-up conditions. Used for low ambient cooling to 30°F with TXV. Rubber Isolators — Five (5) large rubber donuts to isolate condensing unit from transmitting energy into mounting frame or pad. Use on any application where sound transmission needs to be minimized. Hard Start kit — Start capacitor and relay to assist compressor motor startup. Use in areas with marginal power supply, on long linesets, low ambient conditions, etc. Extreme Condition Mount Kit — Bracket kits to securely mount condensing unit to a frame or pad without removing any panels. Use in areas with high winds, or on commercial roof tops, etc. Product Specifications Model No. 1 4TTA3042D3 4TTA3042D4 4TTA3048D3 4TTA3048D4 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz 2 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 18 8 18 8 Max Fuse Size (Amps)30 15 30 15 Compressor SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL RL Amps - LR Amps 13.6 - 83 6.4 - 41 13.7 - 83 6.4 - 41 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 1.2 0.6 1.2 0.6 Fan HP 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/5 Fan Dia (inches)27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 Coil Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™ Refrigerant R-410A 6/2-LB/OZ 6/2-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ Line Size - (in.) O.D. Gas 3 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 Line Size - (in.) O.D. Liquid 3 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec. Subcooling 10°10°10°10° Dimensions H x W x D (Crated)34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 Weight - Shipping 228 228 235 235 Weight - Net 196 196 203 203 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: 4 Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs - Base & Cap 4" High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs - 4" Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset 5 TAYREFLN7*TAYREFLN7*TAYREFLN3*TAYREFLN3 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels 578 Appendix ) 9iEratiRn CalFulatiRns 579 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 580 13603 Vibration Screening Receptors Distance (ft) 1 - Single-Family Residential (E)50 2 - Mulberry Ed. Center (N)205 Equipment PPVref D n Eref Eequip PPV Vibratory Roller 0.21 50 1.3 0.0853 Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 1.3 0.0136 Large Bulldozer 0.089 50 1.3 0.0361 Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 1.3 0.0058 Small Bulldozer 0.003 50 1.3 0.0012 Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 1.3 0.0002 Loaded Truck 0.076 50 1.3 0.0309 Loaded Truck 0.076 205 1.3 0.0049 Jackhammer 0.035 50 1.3 0.0142 Jackhammer 0.035 205 1.3 0.0023 581 Appendix G 7raIIiF ,mSaFt Analysis 582 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 583 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 Prepared for: Mr. Alan Smith Southwest Design Group 12223 Highland Ave., Ste. 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Prepared by: Scott Sato, P.E. 4225 Oceanside Blvd., 354H Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 291-1400 TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC.TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. (0301-0001-03) 584 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1 A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives B. Site Location and Study Area C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description 2. Existing Land Use 3. Proposed Land Use 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project 5. Proposed Project Opening Year 6. Proposed Project Phasing 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES ................................................................... 7 A. Level of Service Definition B. Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 11 A. Study Area Intersections B. Area Roadway System C. Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ................................................................................. 15 C. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate 2. Project Trip Generation 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 4. Other Trip Generation Factors 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 2. Method of Projection 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes 585 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION PAGE 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 33 A. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions B. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions C. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions D. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 39 A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site 586 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1-A Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 3 1-B Site Plan .......................................................................................................................... 4 3-A Existing (2018) Traffic Controls and Intersection Geometrics ....................................... 12 3-B Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................... 13 4-A Project Trip Distribution ................................................................................................... 17 4-B Project Only Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................... 19 4-C Cumulative Developments Location Map ...................................................................... 20 4-D DRC 2018-00119 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 22 4-E DRC 2013-00565 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 23 4-F DRC 2017-00654 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 24 4-G DRC 2016-00695 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 25 4-H Neighboring Property Trip Distribution ........................................................................... 26 4-I Cumulative Development Only Traffic Volumes ............................................................ 27 4-J Opening Day Plus AmbieTOCnt Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Traffic Volumes ...... 28 4-K Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................... 30 4-L Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Traffic Volumes ................................................... 31 4-M Horizon Year (2040) With Project Traffic Volumes ........................................................ 32 6-A Circulation Recommendations ....................................................................................... 40 587 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... ES-1 2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. ES-2 3-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2018) Conditions...................................................... 14 4-1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... 16 4-2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. 16 4-3 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Rates ......................................................... 21 4-4 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Summary ................................................... 21 5-1 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions ................................................................................................ 34 5-2 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions ............................................................................................. 35 5-3 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ........................................................... 36 5-4 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions ................................................................ 38 588 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF APPENDICES Scoping Agreement ..................................................................................................................... 3.1 Traffic Count Worksheets ........................................................................................................... 3.2 Existing (2018) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ................................................. 3.3 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.1 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.2 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.3 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.4 589 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed by 2019 with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip- ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37, PM-35) and a 5 internal trip reduction was assumed. The pass- by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Automated Car Wash Empirical Data 140 Feet 025 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 1 Source: Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) ES-1 590 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY LAND USE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA The traffic study has been conducted in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga traffic study guidelines. These guidelines include the following conditions: o Existing (2018) Traffic o Opening Day  Ambient Traffic  Cumulative (ODAC 2019) o Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative  Project (ODACP 2019) o Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions o Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed project. Project recommendations include: x Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. x On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. x Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. ES-2 591 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The traffic study will be based on the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program and Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines criteria. Study objectives include the following: Existing (2018) Traffic. Existing traffic will be counted to determine current conditions. This constitutes the environmental setting for a CEQA analysis at the time that the hearing body reviews the project. Traffic count data shall be new or recent. In some cases, data up to one year old may be acceptable with the approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department. Any exception to this must be requested prior to approval of the scoping agreement Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative (ODAC 2019). Traffic conditions prior to the time that the proposed development is completed will be estimated by increasing the existing traffic counts by an appropriate growth rate to be provided by City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department staff, projected to the year that the project is estimated to be completed. Traffic generated by other cumulative projects will then be added, and the impacts on the circulation system will be analyzed. This will be the basis for determining ³no-project´ conditions. Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative  Project (ODACP 2019). Traffic generated by the project will be added to the ³No Project´ conditions identified in Scenario 2. This scenario will identify the potential project impacts to the circulation system. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project. The Horizon Year forecasts has been developed based on applying a 2 per year growth rate (44 total growth) to the existing traffic volumes and traffic generated by other cumulative projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project. The project traffic has been added to the Horizon Year traffic volumes to determine the potential long range impacts due to the project traffic. 1 592 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) B. Site Location and Study Area The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Figure 1-A illustrates the site location and the traffic analysis study area. In general, the study area shall include any intersection of Collector or higher classification street with another Collector roadway or higher classification street, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Per discussion with City Staff, the study area includes the following intersections: STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. / Arrow Route. C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description The Arbor Car Wash site is proposed to be developed by 2019. The following uses are proposed as indicated below: x An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel 2. Existing Land Use The project site is currently vacant. Adjacent uses include the following: x North ±Residential x South ±Commercial x East ±Residential x West ± Vacant/Gas Station 3. Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use: Car Wash 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project Figure 1-B illustrates the conceptual land use plan. As shown in Figure 1-B, the project is proposed to have a full access driveway along Arrow Route and a reciprocal access with the adjacent gas station. 2 593 3 594 4 595 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 5. Proposed Project Opening Year The proposed project is anticipated to be completed by 2019. Future traffic analysis has been based on a background (ambient) growth of 2 per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. 6. Proposed Project Phasing The project is expected to be completed in a single phase. Therefore, all traffic recommendations included in this report have been assumed to be completed by 2019. 5 596 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT) THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK  6 597 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES Traffic operations are quantified through the determination of Level of Service (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade A through F is assigned to an infrastructure facility (intersection) representing progressively worsening traffic conditions. This section presents the LOS definition, LOS criteria and methodologies for the Intersection Operations. A. Level of Service Definition The definitions of Level of Service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: x LOS A: Completely free-flow conditions. The operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles, and operations are constrained only by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is good. Minor disruptions to flow are easily absorbed without a change in travel speed. x LOS B: Free flow conditions, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver. Minor disruptions are still easily absorbed, although local deterioration in LOS will be more obvious. x LOS C: The influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles. Minor disruptions can cause serious local deterioration in service, and queues will form behind any significant traffic disruption. x LOS D: The ability to maneuver is restricted due to traffic congestion. Travel speed is reduced by the increasing volume. Only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating. x LOS E: Operations at or near capacity, an unstable level. Vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. x LOS F: Forced or breakdown flow. It occurs either when vehicles arrive at a rate greater than the rate at which they are discharged or when the forecast demand exceeds the computed capacity of a planned facility. Although operations at these points ± and on sections immediately downstream ± appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages. 7 598 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) B. City of Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established Level of Service (LOS) ³D´ as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS ³E´ or ³F´ is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate Level of Service (LOS) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The Levels of Service results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine level of service. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the level of service has been calculated. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. 8 599 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) The levels of service are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. 9 600 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT) THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK  10 601 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS A. Study Area Intersections In general, the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of ³Collector´ or higher classification street, with ³Collector´ or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project could have a significant impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department may require deviation from these requirements based on area conditions. Pursuant to the attached scoping agreement (see Appendix 3.1), and discussions with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the study area include the following intersections (shown previously on Figure 1-A): STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. / Arrow Route. B. Area Roadway System Figure 3-A identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The existing intersection traffic controls and geometrics are identified. C. Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes Existing intersection level of service calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts made for Trames Solutions, Inc. in June 2018 while school was in session. Existing (2018) AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 3-B. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix 3.2. Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes (see Figure 3-B) for the roadway are estimated based on the following formula: PM Peak Hour Link Volume (Approach  Exit) x 12 ADT Leg Volume. D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service The City of Rancho Cucamonga has established Level of Service (LOS) ³D´ as the maximum allowable threshold for the intersection operations. Therefore, LOS ³E´ or ³F´ is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures. The results of the existing conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 3-1. The existing condition operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 3.3. As shown on Table 3-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route is currently operating at unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with the existing geometry and traffic controls. 11 602 12 603 13 604 TABLE 3-1 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 64.9 47.5 E D 2Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 28.0 24.3 D C 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 39.6 37.2 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service Future Intersection AM PM Level of Service3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING (2018) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Delay 3Intersection Approach Lanes 2 (secs.)WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthbound C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report/3-1 14 605 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC This section of the report quantifies the number of trips generated by the proposed project and other known developments in the area. A. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination. Therefore, to account for these trips (termed ³ambient growth´), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. A 2 ambient growth rate that has been used in this study to account for traffic not attributed to the project or other planned developments within the study area. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. 2. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development. For the purpose of this analysis, the following land use assumption is evaluated: x An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 4-2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37, PM-35) and a 5 internal trip 15 606 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) reduction was assumed. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 4-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Automated Car Wash Empirical Data 140 Feet 0.25 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 1 Source: Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) TABLE 4-2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY LAND USE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The project’s trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution pattern for the project is illustrated on Figure 4-A. 4. Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination. Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project. A 5 reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. 16 607 17 608 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37 and 35 were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Appendix 3.1 contains the survey sheets. 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site s trip generation, trip distribution, proposed arterial highway and local street systems, which would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the site. Based on the identified project traffic generation and distribution, Project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-B. B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 4. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-C and include the following projects: x DRC 20118-000119 (9000 Hellman Ave.) ± 174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse x DRC 2013-00565 (NE of Archibald/7th) ± 171,941 General Industrial x DRC 2017-00654 (SW of Haven/26th) ± 207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail x DRC 2016-00695 (8th/Industrial) ± 150,003 sf General Industrial 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation Table 4-3 presents the cumulative development trip generation rates and anticipated cumulative traffic volumes. Table 4-4 indicates that the cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 4,822 trips per day with 465 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 504 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. 18 609 19 610 20 611 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE 4-3 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE ITE CODE QUANTITY2 PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL General Light Industrial 110 Varies TSF 0.62 0.08 0.70 0.08 0.55 0.63 4.96 Multifamily (Low Rise) 220 207 DU 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 General Office Bldg. 710 1.625 TSF 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 11.03 Shopping Center 820 Varies TSF 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.83 1.90 3.73 42.94 1 Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units TABLE 4-4 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY MAP ID PROJECT NAME LAND USE QUANTITY 1 PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 1 Overton Moore Properties (DRC 2018-00119) Gen. Lt. Industrial 174.745 TSF 108 14 122 14 96 110 867 2 SCHEU Management Corp (DRC 2013-00565) Gen. Lt. Industrial 171.941 TSF 107 14 121 14 95 109 853 3 Charles Joseph Assoc. (DRC 2017-00654) Multifamily Housing 207 DU 23 72 95 72 43 115 1,515 Shopping Center 14.3 TSF 9 6 15 26 27 53 614 Pass-by (25% Retail) -2 -2 -4 -7 -6 -13 -154 Subtotal 30 76 106 91 64 155 1,975 4 Rancho Cucamonga Prop. (DRC 2016- 00695) Gen. Lt. Industrial 150.003 TSF 93 12 105 12 83 95 744 5 Neighboring Property (east of project site) Gen. Office Bldg. 1.625 TSF 2 1 3 1 2 3 18 Shopping Center 8.5 TSF 5 3 8 16 16 32 365 Subtotal 7 4 11 17 18 35 383 Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation 345 120 465 148 356 504 4,822 1 TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-D through 4-H contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Based on the identified trip distribution for the cumulative development on arterial highways throughout the study area, cumulative development traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-I. Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-J. 21 612 22 613 23 614 24 615 25 616 26 617 27 618 28 619 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-K. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Traffic Volumes are shown on Figure 4-L. The Horizon Year forecasts were based on applying a 2 per year growth rate to the existing traffic volumes and additional traffic from previously identified cumulative development projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 4-M. These forecasts were based on the adding the project traffic to the Horizon Year without Project traffic forecasts. 29 620 30 621 31 622 32 623 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Peak hour intersection analysis has been performed at the study area intersections for ODAC of the project scenarios and for projected future conditions. Improvements are recommended to satisfy the level of service requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and if the following impacts are identified: 1) Any study intersection that is operating at LOS ³A´, ³B´, ³C´ or ³D´ for any study scenario without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to a LOS ³E´ or ³F´ shall mitigate the impact to bring the intersection back to as least LOS ³D´ . 2) Any study intersection that is operating at a LOS ³E´ or ³F´ for any study scenario without project traffic shall mitigate any impacts so as to bring the intersection back to the overall level of delay established prior to project traffic being added.. A. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions The results of the ODAC conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-1. The ODAC conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.1. As shown on Table 5-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is projected to continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn at the Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route intersection is improve intersection delay to acceptable level of service (LOS ³D´ or better). B. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions The results of the ODACP conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-2. The ODACP conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.2. As shown on Table 5-4, no new intersections are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse), in addition to the deficient intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route as previously identified under Existing and ODAC 2019 conditions, with existing geometry and traffic controls. The separate southbound right turn improvement identified under ODAC conditions for the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to improve intersection LOS to acceptable level of service (LOS ³D´ or better). C. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-3. The Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.3. As shown on Table 5-3, the following 33 624 TABLE 5-1 Traffic Control 1 L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM 1 Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 12d12012012070.6 52.8 E D - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012054.2 51.4 D D 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 01000002012030.6 26.3 D D 3 Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 12011112012039.8 38.7 D D 4 Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service Future Intersection Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE (2019) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-1 34 625 TABLE 5-2 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 71.3 53.9 E D - With Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012054.752.5D D 2Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 31.5 27.9 D D 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 40.1 39.5 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route CSS 00001 00.51.50 0 2 023.730.3 C D 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane; 1 = Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE PLUS POJECT (2019) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-2 35 626 TABLE 5-3 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 119.6 116.6 F F - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012094.3 107.8 F F 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route4,5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 37.9 57.3 E F 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 51.6 52.6 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach (northbound left tun movement) is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. Future Intersection Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORI=ON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-3 36 627 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls: x Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) x Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-3 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. D. Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-4. The Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.4. As shown on Table 5-4, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. Similar to Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersections of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-4 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. For the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (3) intersection, restricting the driveway to a right- in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. 37 628 TABLE 5-4 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 120.2 118.2 F F - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012095.4 114.9 F F 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route4,5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 39.7 62.8 E F 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 52.3 53.3 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route CSS 00001 00.51.50 0 2 0 48.8 46.8 E E - With RIRO/LI Access6 CSS 000001 0.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 17.9 17.2 C C 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane; 1 = Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach (northbound left tun movement) is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. 6 RIRO/LI = Right-In / Right-Out / Left-In Only Driveway INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORI=ON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-4 38 629 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis For Existing (2018), ODAC (2019), and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) is operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn lane is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2) are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the peak hours. Further improvements in addition to the improvements previously identified under ODAC (2019) conditions are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. For Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service. Restricting the Project driveway to a right-in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site Figure 6-A illustrates the on-site recommended roadway and intersection lane improvements. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below. x Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. x On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. x Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. 39 630 40 631 Appendix H ,nIiltratiRn 7estinJ 5eSRrt 632 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 633 RGS Engineering Geology 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California 91784 ckrall@aol.com (951) 315-3517   Geologic Evaluation Fault/Seismic Studies Environmental Assessments Infiltration Testing   September 12, 2018 Allan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 SUBJECT: REPORT OF INFILTRATION TESTING Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, California Project No. 1702-01 Mr. Smith: In accordance with your authorization, we have conducted infiltration testing for low impact development (LID) design associated with the proposed site improvements. Our test procedures and content of this report conform to the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations related to site infiltration are presented herein. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, or require additional services, please call our office. Respectfully submitted, RGS Engineering Geology ________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Engineering Geologist 634 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 INTRODUCTION Accompanying Map, Illustrations, And Appendices Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Infiltration Test Location Plan Appendix A - References Appendix B - Exploratory Trench Logs Appendix C - Infiltration Test Data Scope of Work For the purpose of this study RGS conducted the following scope or work in accordance with written authorization: x Review related geologic and soils information available in our files. x Excavate, log, and backfill two deep exploratory trenches on-site to evaluate the underlying soil condition to a maximum depth of 15 feet. x Excavate a total of two shallow test pits to a depth near the bottom of the proposed basin for infiltration testing. x Prepare each test pit for infiltration testing. x Conduct two field infiltration tests to determine the representative rate to be used for storm water mitigation design. Testing utilized the Riverside County percolation test method in conformance with the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Documents for Water Quality Management. x Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and geologic recommendations for storm water basin design. Purpose and Objective The purpose and objective of testing is to determine the rate of storm water infiltration for native sediments exposed along the bottom of proposed retention basins associated with site improvements at the proposed Arbor Carwash Express in Rancho Cuca Monga, California. Best management practices utilize drawdown time based on infiltration rate combined with the interaction of chemical, physical, and biological processes between soil, organic matter, and water to filter out sediments and constituents from surface run- off and storm water. Accordingly, best management practices require a maximum 635 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 drawdown time to provide proper filtration and avoid nuisance issues. Since drawdown time is contingent on the infiltration rate of the underlying soil, tests are used to help establish the vertical infiltration rate of the soil below a proposed infiltration facility. The test methods attempt to simulate the physical processes and seasonal variance that will occur when the facility is in operation. The established infiltration rate combined with calculated storm water flow is then used by the project engineer to design the low impact development best management practice for water quality suited to the particular project. Site Conditions and Location The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route just east of Archibald Avenue in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The geographical relationship of the site and surrounding area is shown on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. Most of the site is currently vacant with a small residence located near the center of the property. Access for infiltration testing was limited due to the existence of the home. However, the soil conditions in the area tested are considered representative of the infiltration basin and the site as a whole based on the local geology. Topography in the area of the proposed improvements is generally flat with a gradient of less than 2 percent toward the south-southwest. The area is void of shrubs or trees with only a sparse growth of seasonal weeds and grasses observed. Proposed Development The proposed site improvements include an express carwash with associated landscaping, hardscape, and buildings. Low impact design for storm water quality includes a water run-off retention basin near the south-central portion of the site. The proposed improvements and low impact development facilities are shown on depicted on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SITE EVALUATION AND TESTING Subsurface Evaluation To evaluate the subsurface conditions below the proposed retention basin and infiltration trench, two exploratory trench excavations (one at each infiltration facility) were conducted using Case 580 M rubber tired backhoe equipped with a 24 inch wide bucket to a depth of at least 10 feet below the proposed basin or trench invert. The number of exploratory excavations was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Each excavation was carefully monitored by our state licensed Engineering Geologist, Christopher Krall, who prepared a log of the soil column, encountered and collected representative soil samples for field classification as warranted. Geologic conditions 636 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 related to infiltration such as soil texture, density, and moisture content was recorded. Soil color and mottling or staining and groundwater occurrence were also noted. A copy of the exploratory trench logs is provided in Append B of this report for review. The exploratory trenches were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. Infiltration Test Method Our field test method for infiltration was conducted in conformance with Appendix A of the Riverside County Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our test method followed the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. This test measures the length of time required for a quantity of water to infiltrate into the soil and is often called a ³percolation rate´. It should be noted that the percolation rate is related to, but not equal to, the infiltration rate. While an infiltration rate is a measure of the speed at which water progresses downward into the soil, the percolation rate measures not only the downward progression but the lateral progression through the soil as well. This reflects the fact that the surface area for infiltration testing would include only the horizontal surface while the percolation test includes both the bottom surface area and the sidewalls of the test hole. However, there is a relationship between the values obtained by a percolation test and infiltration rate expressed by the following equation known as the Porchet Method of converting percolation rate to infiltration rate. It ǻH (60r) ǻt (r2Havg) Where: I t tested infiltration rate (inches/hour) ǻH change in head over the time interval, inches ǻt time interval, minutes r effective radius of test hole H avg average head over the time interval, inches Test Preparation and Procedure Test pits were excavated at each proposed infiltration facilities (two for the proposed basin and two for the proposed trench) to a depth of two to three feet below the exiting ground surface to replicate the bottom of the infiltration facility. The number of test pits was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Along the bottom of each test pit a test hole was excavated to a depth of 22 to 24 inches with a diameter of approximately 8 inches. A six inch diameter perforated plastic pipe and 2 inches of gravel was placed in each test hole to prevent scouring or erosion. 637 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 A water container was inverted over each test hole and 5 gallons of clean water was allowed to soak into the soil prior to testing. Pre-soaking of the test holes was performed to emulate possible saturated conditions during seasonal storms. Where pre-soaking of the test holes was complete in a timely manner, testing was conducted immediately following the pre-soak. Where pre-soaking was slower, testing was conducted the following day. Under no circumstance was presoaking allowed to continue for more than 26 hours. Following the presoak, test holes were filled with clear water to a height of 20 inches (5 times the test-hole radius) and the time required for the water to seep into the soil was recorded. All measurements were taken from a fixed reference point using a ruler placed within the test hole and are accurate to 0.25 inches. When 2 consecutive measurements indicated that 6 inches of water seeps into the soil in less than 25 minutes, the strata was classified as ³sandy soil´ and testing continued for an additional hour with measurements taken every 10 minutes. The drop that occurs during the final 10 minutes was used to calculate the field percolation rate. In non-sandy material at least twelve measurements were recorded over a period of at least six hours at approximately 30 minutes intervals. The final reading was used to calculate the field percolation rate. The test pits were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. At the completion of testing, a 3 feet long surveyor’s stake (lath), flagged with highly visible banner tape was placed in the location of the test indicating date, test hole number, and the company performing the test. The approximate location of each test pit is shown on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND TEST RESULTS Earth Material The earth material underlying the infiltration areas is summarized below. Detailed descriptions of the soil characteristics are provided on our exploratory trench logs, Appendix B. In summary the subsurface conditions below each proposed infiltration areas are similar and expose silty sand (Unified Soil Classification ± SM) that is yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, medium dense, non-cohesive, moderately graded, with a slight blocky soil structure. Soil stratigraphy is generally consistent to a depth of 15 feet or more. Groundwater Occurrence Groundwater was encountered in both of our exploratory trench excavation at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. 638 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 6 In general, groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface and groundwater is not expected to impact this development. Test Results Our field test data is presented in Appendix C for review and summarized in Table I below. The percolation rate of the earth material underlying the infiltration areas yields good percolation rates ranging from 1.12 to 1.16 minutes per inch. These values were converted to infiltration rate following the Porchet Method equation as explained in the previous section of this report. TABLE 1 7DEXlDWeG 3erFolDWion,nIilWrDWion 7eVW ReVXlWV Test No. Location Interval Tested (inches) Earth Materials Perc. Rate (min/inch) Infilt. Rate (inch/hour) P-1 ^ĞĞ WůĂŶ 34´-54´ Silty Sand (SM) 1.12 6.91 P-2 ^ĞĞ WůĂŶ 37´-57´ Silty Sand (SM) 1.16 6.75     CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions x Based on our investigation, the areas of proposed infiltration are underlain by silty sand (SM) that is considered permeable with moderate to good percolation rates to a depth of 15 feet below the ground surface. x Groundwater was not encountered in each exploratory trench at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater is not expected to impact the development or infiltration process. x A field infiltration rate of 6.75 inches per hour is considered representative of the underlying native soil and should be considered the standard for design of the low impact development system. x Considering the location and geologic setting of the site, installation of the proposed LID BMP will not create adverse effects to slope stability, soil erosion, off-site impacts. 639 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 Recommendations x The low impact development system should be designed by the project engineer considering the geologic information and field infiltration rate contained in this report. x All required setbacks as set forth in the design handbook should be adhered to during site planning, design, and construction. x To account for long term performance variables of full scale working infiltration facilities due to accumulation of fine particles, post construction compaction of native soil, non-homogeneous soil strata, and site variations, a safety factor of 3 should be applied to the infiltration rate for design purposes. x Future building expansion or other improvements in the area of the infiltration system, including hardscape, flatwork sidewalks or paving, and water wells, should be reviewed by this firm and approved by the local governing agency. CLOSURE It is the owner s responsibility to insure that proper design and construction methods of the infiltration LID system are employed. Improper placement or construction of the system can cause premature failure regardless of the soil conditions. It is also the owner s responsibility to adequately maintain this infiltration system to extend its longevity and performance. Please understand that this investigation was limited to the evaluation and feasibility of soil infiltration rates and has not included a comprehensive analysis of the stability of the proposed development from a geotechnical standpoint. 640 641 642 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX A References 643 RGS Engineering Geology REFERENCES Carson, Scott E. and Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 Franks, Alvin, l., 1972, ³Geology for Individual Sewage Disposal Systems,´ in California Geology, Volume 25, Number 9, September 1972, pp. 195-203 Heath, Ralph C., 1987, ³Basic Groundwater Hydrology´, United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Kaplan, Benjamin O., 1988, ³Septic Systems Handbook´, Lewis Publishers, Second Printing 1988, 283 pp. Riverside County Flood Control District, 2001, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices, Revised September 2011. San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. 644 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX B Exploratory Trench Logs 645 EXPLORATORY TRENCH LOG 352-(&7 1$0( $UERU &DUZDVK (/(9$7,21 BBB1$BBBBBBBBB 75(1&+ 12 BB7BBBB 352-(&7 1R BBBBBBBBB (48,30(17 BB&$6( BBBBBBB '(37+ )((7 7<3( 2) 7(67 6$03/( '(37+ '5< '(16,7< 3&) 02,6785( &217(17  86&6 62,/ &/$66,),&$7,21 ($57+ 0$7(5,$/ GE27E&+1,&$/ 'ES&R,37,21 /2GGE' %< &. '$7E 61318 _______ S$03/E' %< _______&._________  Alluvium (Qal) NG 94.1 3.6 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): BULK Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 105.2 4.8 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive,  Slight blocky structure      Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG 7UHQG 6FDOH   7(67 6<0%2/6 %  %8/. 6$03/( 5  5,1* 6$03/( 6&  6$1'&21( 0'  0$;,080 '(16,7< *6  *5$,1 6,=( 6(  6$1' (48,9$/(17 1*  18&/($5 *$8*(   5(/$7,9( &203$&7,21 646 EXPLORATORY TRENCH LOG 352-(&7 1$0( $UERU &DUZDVK (/(9$7,21 BBB1$BBBBBBBBB 75(1&+ 12 BB7BBBB 352-(&7 1R BBBBBBBBB (48,30(17 BB&$6( BBBBBBB '(37+ )((7 7<3( 2) 7(67 6$03/( '(37+ '5< '(16,7< 3&) 02,6785( &217(17  86&6 62,/ &/$66,),&$7,21 ($57+ 0$7(5,$/ GE27E&+1,&$/ 'ES&R,37,21 /2GGE' %< &. '$7E 61318 _______ S$03/E' %< _______&._________  Alluvium (Qal) NG 93.8 3.9 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 107.4 5.1 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive,  Slight blocky structure      Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG 7UHQG 6FDOH   7(67 6<0%2/6 %  %8/. 6$03/( 5  5,1* 6$03/( 6&  6$1'&21( 0'  0$;,080 '(16,7< *6  *5$,1 6,=( 6(  6$1' (48,9$/(17 1*  18&/($5 *$8*(   5(/$7,9( &203$&7,21 647 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX C Infiltration Test Data 648 WƌŽũĞĐƚ͗WƌŽũĞĐƚ EŽ͗ĂƚĞ͗ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ EŽ͗/Ͳϭ dĞƐƚĞĚ LJ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ;dͿ͗ϮϬΗͲϯϮΗ h^^ ^Žŝů ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ϰ ϮϬ dƌŝĂů EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶŝƚŝĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ &ŝŶĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ϭ ϲ͗ϭϱ ϲ͗ϯϬ ϭϱ ϭϬ Ϯ ϴ Ϯ ϲ͗ϯϬ ϲ͗ϰϱ ϭϱ ϭϬ Ϯ ϴ ZĞĂĚŝŶŐ  EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ ;ȴƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ŽͿ /ŶŝƚŝĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;&Ϳ &ŝŶĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ȴ,Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ  ,ĞĂĚ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ WĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶ  ZĂƚĞ  ;ŵŝŶͬ͘ŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĂƚĞ  ;ŝŶͬ͘Śƌ͘Ϳ ϭ ϭϭ͗ϱϱ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ Ϯ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ ϯ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϰ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘Ϯ ϴ͘ϴ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϲ͘ϴϲ ϲ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϮ͗ϱϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗ WZK>d/KE d^d d ^,d ^Ez ^K/> Z/dZ/ d^dΎ Ύ/Ĩ ƚǁŽ ĐŽŶƐĞĐƵƚŝǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌŵĞŶƚƐ ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞ ƚŚĂƚ ϲ ŝŶĐŚĞƐ ŽĨ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƐĞĞƉƐ ŝŶƚŽ ƐŽŝů ŝŶ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ Ϯϱ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƚĞƐƚ  ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ƌƵŶ ĨŽƌ ĂŶ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƌ ǁŝƚŚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƚĂŬĞŶ ĞǀĞƌLJ ϭϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘  KƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ ƚĞƐƚ ŚŽůĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƉƌĞͲƐŽĂŬĞĚ  ŽǀĞƌŶŝŐŚƚ ĂŶĚ Ăƚ ůĞĂƐƚ ƚǁůĞǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ϲ ŚŽƵƌ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϯϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐͿ͘  džĐĞů dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ϭϲϱϯͲϬϭ ^ŝůƚLJ ^ĂŶĚ ;^DͿ ϭϭͬϭϲͬϮϬϭϲ 'ƌĞĂƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ Žƌ ƋƵĂů ƚŽ ϲΗ  ;LJͬŶͿ zĞƐ zĞƐ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ ;ŝŶĐŚĞƐͿ͗ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ŚƌŝƐƚŽƉŚĞƌ <ƌĂůů 649 WƌŽũĞĐƚ͗WƌŽũĞĐƚ EŽ͗ĂƚĞ͗ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ EŽ͗WͲϮ dĞƐƚĞĚ LJ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ;dͿ͗ϮϬΗͲϯϮΗ h^^ ^Žŝů ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ϰ ϮϬ dƌŝĂů EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶŝƚŝĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ &ŝŶĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ϭ ϳ͗Ϭϱ ϳ͗ϭϯ ϴ ϯ ϵ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϳ͗ϭϰ ϳ͗Ϯϯ ϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϯ ϲ͘Ϭϱ ZĞĂĚŝŶŐ  EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ ;ȴƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ŽͿ /ŶŝƚŝĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;&Ϳ &ŝŶĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ȴ,Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ  ,ĞĂĚ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ WĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶ  ZĂƚĞ  ;ŵŝŶͬ͘ŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĂƚĞ  ;ŝŶͬ͘Śƌ͘Ϳ ϭ ϭϭ͗ϱϱ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ Ϯ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϯ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘Ϯ ϴ͘ϴ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϲ͘ϴϲ ϰ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϯ ϴ͘ϳ ϭ͘ϭϱ ϲ͘ϴϬ ϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϰ ϴ͘ϲ ϭ͘ϭϲ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϲ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϮ͗ϱϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϰ ϴ͘ϲ ϭ͘ϭϲ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ WZK>d/KE d^d d ^,d ^Ez ^K/> Z/dZ/ d^dΎ Ύ/Ĩ ƚǁŽ ĐŽŶƐĞĐƵƚŝǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌŵĞŶƚƐ ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞ ƚŚĂƚ ϲ ŝŶĐŚĞƐ ŽĨ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƐĞĞƉƐ ŝŶƚŽ ƐŽŝů ŝŶ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ Ϯϱ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƚĞƐƚ  ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ƌƵŶ ĨŽƌ ĂŶ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƌ ǁŝƚŚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƚĂŬĞŶ ĞǀĞƌLJ ϭϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘  KƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ ƚĞƐƚ ŚŽůĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƉƌĞͲƐŽĂŬĞĚ  ŽǀĞƌŶŝŐŚƚ ĂŶĚ Ăƚ ůĞĂƐƚ ƚǁůĞǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ϲ ŚŽƵƌ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϯϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐͿ͘  džĐĞů dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ϭϲϱϯͲϬϭ ^ŝůƚLJ ^ĂŶĚ ;^DͿ ϭϭͬϭϲͬϮϬϭϲ 'ƌĞĂƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ Žƌ ƋƵĂů ƚŽ ϲΗ  ;LJͬŶͿ zĞƐ zĞƐ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ ;ŝŶĐŚĞƐͿ͗ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ŚƌŝƐƚŽƉŚĞƌ <ƌĂůů ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗ 650 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project State Clearinghouse No. N/A June 15, 2020 651 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. 652 Arbor Express Car Wash 1 June 8, 2020 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) identifies Mitigation Measures incorporated into the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project (Project). For each Mitigation Measure, the MMRP identifies the significant impact, the related mitigation measure, the implementation entity, the monitoring and verification entity, and timing requirements. 653 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 654 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 3 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potential Impacts on Migratory Nesting Birds. BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500- foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to vegetation removal. 655 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non- anthropogenic nest failure). CULTURAL RESOURCS Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 656 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 5 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 657 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 658 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 7 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 659 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 660 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 9 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth- moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground 661 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 662 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 11 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. Disturbance of Human Remains. SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 663 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 12 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 664 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 13 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 665 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ 666 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 15 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Department/Tribal Representatives Ground Disturbing Activities. NOISE Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Local Standards During Construction NOI-1: The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction: • Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits. 667 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise- generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited. • Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance. • The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for 668 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 17 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site. If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Local Standards During Operation NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits. 669 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 18 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 670 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 19 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks during grading and earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 671 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. 672 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 21 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground- disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 673 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. 674 675 676 677 678 RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. DRC2018-00536, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT AUTOMATED CAR WASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 DETAIL CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the issuance of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00536, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Conditional Use Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District 679 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP DRC2018-00536– ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation d. The project is for the development and operation of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center; and e. The carwash and detail center will employ approximately 25 full and part-time employees with 7 persons on the largest shift for both the carwash and detail center. The facility will operate 7 days per week from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with customers staying in their vehicle during the car washing and drying process; and f. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 40 parking spaces, 24 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 16 parking spaces; and b. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Design Review DRC2018-00535 for the site plan and design of the facility and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019- 00218 to remove onsite trees. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of one of the parcels that make up the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, carwashes are a permitted land use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed car wash is compliant with each of the applicable development standards of the Development Code; and b. That the site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is suitable for a car wash land use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development 680 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP DRC2018-00536– ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 standards for a carwash facility; and c. That granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Subject to the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the proposed carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 681 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-12 CUP DRC2018-00536– ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 . 2) All conditions of approval as contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. 20-XX for Design Review DRC2018-00535 shall apply. 5. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 202 1, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 682 RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218, A REQUEST TO REMOVE 17 TREES RELATED TO A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT CARWASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 SQUARE FOOT DETAILING CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, de termined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Rec itals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. Based upon the subst antial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District 683 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC2019-00218 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 2 d. Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 is for the removal of 17 trees. An Arborist Report (Steve Anderson, Arborist) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the 17 onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal; and e. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Design Review DRC2018-00535 tor the design and site plan review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 to operate the carwash. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The related carwash and detail center (Design Review DRC2018-00535) will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of the related General Plan amendment to change the land use designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC). The removal of the subject trees is necessary to develop the related 131-unit mixed- use development; and b. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be in accord with the objectives of the Municipal Code and the purposes of the district in which permits the removal of heritage trees when associated with the development of the project site. In this case, removal of the trees is necessary to construct a related 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center. The Arborist Report submitted for the project (Steve Anderson, Arborist) concluded that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal; and c. The proposed Tree Removal Permit will be compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code including replacement of the removed trees with trees of a species and quantity commensurate with the aesthetic value of the trees to be removed. The removed trees will be replaced by 42 trees as part of the proposed project; and d. The proposed Tree Removal Permit, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity as the 17 trees will be replaced with new trees as part of the overall landscape theme. 3. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation 684 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC2019-00218 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 3 finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in conn ection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the po tential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the p roject would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adop t the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 4. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. 685 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-13 TRP DRC2019-00218 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR VIEW CARWASH March 10, 2021 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTE D THIS 10 th DAY OF MARCH 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10 th day of March 2021, by th e followin g vote -to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 686 RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT CARWASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 SQUARE FOOT DETAILING CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2018-00535, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District 687 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 d. The project is for the development of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center; and e. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 40 parking spaces, 24 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 16 parking spaces; and b. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 to operate the carwash and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 to remove onsite trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed carwash will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, which will amend the General Plan land use designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC); and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Carwash facilities are permitted within the General Commercial (GC) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project will be in compliance with the Zoning Map with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District. Carwash facilities are a conditionally permitted use within the General Commercial (GC) District. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project complies with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking and design; and Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation 688 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than- significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the p roject would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamo nga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2018-00535 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-0053 3 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. 689 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 690 RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00533, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR ONE 0.85 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 1.21 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0208-291-01 –02 AND -03. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018-00533 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06 -acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land are currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District 691 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 c. This amendment will change the land use for three parcels of land. Parcel 0208- 291 -01 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Parcels 0208- 291 -01 and -02 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential; and d. This amendment necessitates amending the Zoning Map (DRC2018 -00534) to change zoning designation of one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291 -03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and of two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest as it is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states “Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate.” The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population’s carwash needs and will support the surrounding community’s needs as Arrow Route are identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states “Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas.” The development of a car wash on the two project- related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. b. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not negatively impact the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and c. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City’s regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan and zoning designation for two non-project related parcels Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation 692 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 (208-29-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District; and d. The 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 VS 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will in turn make the project compliant with the no-net-loss provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166); and e. That th e proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment will change the zoning designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for two adjacent parcels of land (APN: 0208- 291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the 693 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018- 00533, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 20 21. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 Conditions of Approval Community Development Department Project #: DRC2018-00535, DRC2018-00536, DRC2019-00218 Project Name: Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review, Conditional Use Permt, Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The installation and operation of outdoor loudspeakers or public address systems is not permitted. The storage of materials, equipment, and waste shall be entirely within the building. The repair and/or storage of vehicles on-site shall not be permitted. 2. The approved operating hours are 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., 7 days per week. Changes to the approved operating hours will require Planning Director approval. 3. Standard Conditions of Approval The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 5. Any modification or intensification of the approved use, including revisions in the operations of the business including changes to the operating days/hours; change in the location on-site or within the building of the use/activity that is approved by this Conditional Use Permit; improvements including new building construction; and/or other modifications/intensification beyond what is specifically approved by this Conditional Use Permit, shall require the review and approval by the Planning Director prior to submittal of documents for plan check/occupancy, construction, commencement of the activity, and/or issuance of a business license. The Planning Director may determine that modifications or intensifications of use require the submittal of an application to modify this Conditional Use Permit for review by the City. 6. This project is subject to the public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. No final approval, such as a final inspection or a certificate of occupancy, for any development project subject to this chapter shall be granted or issued unless and until the requirements of this chapter have been met. In consideration of any phasing plan or project completion schedule, the city may accept bonds or other surety to assist in the completion of the project, provided they are in a form and manner acceptable to the planning director and city attorney. 7. www.CityofRC.us Printed: 2/23/2021 701 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 8. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 9. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 10. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 11. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 12. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. 13. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 14. Unless exempt, directory monument sign(s) shall be provided for apartment, condominium, or town homes prior to occupancy and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department and the RCFPD prior to issuance of Building Permits for the signs in question. (Chapter 17.74.040 B-4) 15. All parking lot landscape islands shall have a minimum outside dimension of 6 feet.16. All parking spaces shall be double striped per City standards and all driveway aisles, entrances, and exits shall be striped per City standards. 17. www.CityofRC.us Page 2 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 702 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 18. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 19. Within parking lots, trees shall be planted at a rate of one 15-gallon tree for every three parking stalls. 20. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 21. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 22. For commercial and industrial projects, paint roll-up doors and service doors to match main building colors. 23. All roof appurtenances, including air conditioners and other roof mounted equipment and/or projections shall be screened from all sides and the sound shall be buffered from adjacent properties and streets as required by the Planning Department. Such screening shall be architecturally integrated with the building design and constructed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically more than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet, shall be screened by an architecturally designed enclosure which exhibits a permanent nature with the building design and is detailed consistent with the building. Any roof-mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork, that projects vertically less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. Details shall be included in building plans. 24. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 25. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Page 3 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 703 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions An easement shall be provided along the westerly portion of your lot (APN 0208-291-06) for the benefit of the parcel to the west, APN 0208-291-05 for ingress and egress prior to building permit issuance. If the parcel to the west APN 0208-291-05 will allow the easement along the easterly portion of their property, concurrently with the development of your project, APN 0208-291-06, the driveway may be centered between the two properties. If your project proceeds first, and you are not able to work with the neighboring property, your driveway shall still meet City Standards and be 35' wide. 1. The existing overhead utilities (telecommunications and electrical) on the project side of Arrow Route shall be undergrounded to the first pole offsite east of the east project boundary to the first pool offsite west of the west project boundary, prior to public improvement acceptance or occupancy, whichever comes first. The developer may request a reimbursement agreement to recover one-half the City adopted costs for undergrounding from future development (redevelopment) as it occurs on the opposite side of the street. 2. Standard Conditions of Approval Additional street right-of-way shall be dedicated along right turn lanes, to provide a minimum of 7 feet measured from the face of curbs. 3. Dedication shall be made of the following rights-of-way on the perimeter streets (measured from street centerline): 50 total feet on Arrow Route, to follow the standards for a Major Arterial. Additional right of way shall be dedicated along the right turn lanes. 4. Easements for public sidewalks placed outside the public right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City.5. The separate parcels contained within the project boundaries shall be legally combined into one parcel prior to issuance of Building Permits. 6. www.CityofRC.us Page 4 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 704 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and / or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs / Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 7. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to the issuance of Building Permits.8. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 9. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: “All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans.” If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 10. www.CityofRC.us Page 5 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 705 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Arrow Route Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. Install signing and striping to include an exclusive right turn lane on the westbound approach at the intersection of Archibald Ave and Arrow Rte. Perform all signal modification necessary to provide a westbound right turn overlap. Furnish and install all traffic signal equipment as required. Developer shall be responsible for paying all fair share mitigation measures prior to the issuance of Building Permits as outlined in the traffic impact analysis for the intersections of Malven Ave at Arrow Rte and Ramona Ave at Arrow Rte totaling $169. 11. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. 12. www.CityofRC.us Page 6 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 706 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, and street lights shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, and street name signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. e. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. f. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 13. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: “Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet ___ (typically Sheet 1).” Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Arrow Route Botanical Name - Ginkgo Biloba "Fairmount" Common Name - Maidenhair Tree Spacing 20' OC Size - 15 gallon min. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 14. www.CityofRC.us Page 7 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 707 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 15. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 16. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 17. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary.18. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 19. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to issuance of permits. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to the issuance of permits. 20. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. Disabled access for the site and building must be in accordance to the State of CA and ADA regulations. If it is anticipated that there will be a need for temporary fire protection water supply and/or temporary fire access, submit a separate plan for review and approval that complies with RCFD Standard 33-3. The permanent fire lane for the site must have 20' inside and 46' outside turn radii and a 120' long hammerhead with the same turn radii. In the plan check documents provide an analysis of the parapet requirements and the fire rating of the east property line wall's fire resistive requirements based on its proximity to the property line. 1. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Page 8 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 708 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 1. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 2. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Building and Safety Official prior to the issuance of building permits. 3. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 4. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 5. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 6. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. 7. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. 8. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 5 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Building and Safety Official. 12. www.CityofRC.us Page 9 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 709 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 13. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 14. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 17. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 18. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 19. www.CityofRC.us Page 10 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 710 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 20. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 21. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 22. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be submitted for review and approval by the Building Official and recorded with the County Recorder’s Office. 23. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 24. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. 25. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 26. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 27. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Building and Safety Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s “Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan” shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 28. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. if required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the Building Official, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 30. www.CityofRC.us Page 11 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 711 Project #: DRC2018-00535 DRC2019-00218 Project Name: DR /// Arbor Express Car Wash Location: 9744 ARROW RTE - 020829106-0000 Project Type: Design Review Tree Removal Permit ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the “Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP” section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of “Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet” located in Appendix D “Section VII – Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, …” of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer’s recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors”. 32. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted “San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans”. 33. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 34. www.CityofRC.us Page 12 of 12Printed: 2/23/2021 712 Planning Department Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval for Design Review DRC2018-00535 I, ____________________________, as applicant for Design Review DRC2018-00 535, hereby state that I am in agreement with and accept the conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2018-00535. Applicant Signature____________________________ Date ______________________________ Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. All other conditions of approval related to Design Review DRC2018 -00535 . 713 Page 1 of 1 DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City Of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Denying a Conditional Use Permit for Alcoholic Beverage Sales Under DRC2020-00087 and Recommending that the City Council Deny a Request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020- 00459 on a 2.33 Acre Lot within the General Industrial (Gi) District at 8768 Archibald Avenue; and Making Findings in Support Thereof – APN: 0209- 032-35. Pursuant to Planning Commission direction provided to staff at the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, staff has prepared the attached resolution which denies alcoholic beverage sales under Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommends that the City Council deny Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459 . As directed by the Planning Commission, staff shall coordinate with the applicant to work on the remainder of the development application, including Tentative Parcel Map 20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and those portions of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 not related to off-sale alcohol, such as the convenience store and service station, and return to the Commission at a later date. 714 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES UNDER DRC2020-00087 AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DENY A REQUEST FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020-00459 ON A 2.33 ACRE LOT WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Orbis Real Estate Partners filed an application for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459 for a Type 20 ABC license (Off-Sale Beer & Wine) related to a lot split and construction of a commercial building to include a service station, convenience store with off-sale alcohol sales, and restaurant. 2. The application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 requires approval of three conditionally permitted uses within the General Industrial District: a convenience store, a service station, and alcoholic beverage sales, 3. Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code defines “alcoholic beverage sales” as “[t]he retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) as an off-sale establishment.” 4. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conduced a noticed public hearing on the application, concluded said hearing on that date and directed staff to prepare a resolution to deny the Conditional Use Permit for the alcoholic beverage establishment and recommend that the City Council deny the request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the Type 20 alcohol license. As part of that same motion, the Planning Commission directed staff to work with the applicant regarding the remainder of the development application, including the tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and those portions of the Conditional Use Permit which do not involve alcohol sales, and return to the Planning Commission at a later date for further review. The purpose of working with the applicant on these remaining entitlement is, in part, to develop conditions of approval relating to the amount of space dedicated to fresh foods in the convenience store and the incorporation of electric charging stations, both of which the applicant had expressed willingness to accept. 5. On the 10th day of March 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted this Resolution denying the Conditional Use Permit for alcoholic beverage sales and recommending that the City Council deny the request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity for the Type 20 alcohol license. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 715 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-00087 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020- 00459 – ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MARCH 10, 2021 Page 2 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon all available evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on February 24, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is proposing the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with off-site alcohol sales and an attached restaurant; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant commercial/industrial General Industrial General industrial (GI) District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (M) Residential District 3. Based upon all of the evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: Findings for denial of Conditional Use Permit for an Alcoholic Beverage Establishment a. The proposed project is inconsistent with the General Plan, specifically General Plan Goals LU-1 and LU-6, and General Plan Policies Lu-1.1 and LU-6.1. General Plan Goal LU-1 requires that the City “ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community-serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents.” Policy LU- 1.1 further requires that the City “Protect neighborhoods from the encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment.” Similarly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City “promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods,” while Policy LU 6-1 elaborates by stating that the City shall, “Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs.” The project proposes Type 20 off-sale alcohol sales within an overconcentrated census tract. If permitted, the census tract would contain three times the number of off-sale alcohol licenses that constitute undue concentration under state law. This would be among the highest number of licenses within a census tract within the City. This concern of overconcentration has been clearly expressed by 716 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-00087 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020- 00459 – ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MARCH 10, 2021 Page 3 neighborhood residents over the course of two neighborhood meetings and during the public hearing. Therefore, approving such a use is not consistent with the stated goals and policies of General Plan Land Use Goals LU-1 and LU-6. b. Granting the permit would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety and welfare, or materially injurious to persons property or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project proposes off-sale alcohol sales within an overconcentrated census tract. The project site is also located across the street from an elementary school and within proximity (1,500 feet) to a middle school. Data from the Sheriff’s Department suggests that there is a correlation between the proximity of off-sale establishments and schools which may increase the potential for alcohol sales to minors, as evidenced at other locations throughout the City of similar uses within close proximity to schools. Findings Recommending Denial of Public Convenience or Necessity a. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulates the distribution of alcohol licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract pursuant to Sections 23958 and 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code. The limits are calculated based on the ratio of alcohol licenses to the population within a specific census tract. In cases where a census tract exceeds the allowable limit of certain alcohol licenses (i.e., creates an “undue concentration”), findings in support of a determination for Public Convenience or Necessity are required to be made by the local governing body. In the case of the subject project, ABC permits 3 off- sale alcohol licenses within Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located; the proposed convenience store would constitute the ninth off-sale alcohol license within the census tract. The Development Code provides no specific findings for determinations of Public Convenience or Necessity by the local governing body, but the governing body is afforded discretion to determine the relevant factors on a case-by-case basis. For Rancho Cucamonga, the local governing body is the City Council. In this case, the Planning Commission believes that issuing the ABC license to the applicant does not serve the public convenience or necessity because: 1) there is already a significant undue concentration of off-sale alcohol licenses in the subject census tract; and 2) the license site is near a school which data provided by the Sheriff’s Department suggests could result in an increase in the number of minors obtaining alcohol; and 3) both of these reasons were expressed by concerned neighbors as part of two public neighborhood meetings and the public hearing before the Planning Commission on February 24, 2021. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that, as to the portions of the project addressed herein, they are exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA Guidelines pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a) as a project that is rejected or disapproved. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth above, and all of the evidence in the record, this Commission hereby denies Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 for an alcoholic beverage establishment and recommends that the City Council deny Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459 for a type-20 ABC license. This Resolution shall not affect the Planning Commission’s discretion with respect to the application for Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 relating to the convenience store or service station. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 717 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2020-00087 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020- 00459 – ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MARCH 10, 2021 Page 4 APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: 718