Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-05-12 Agenda Packet CITY OF ■ . ■ * ■ Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 12, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 7:00 p.m. PURSUANT TO GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM'S EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20 THIS MEETING WILL BE HELD AS A TELECONFERENCE MEETING. In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID-19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the Planning Commission Meetings. Members of the Planning Commission and staff will participate in this meeting via teleconference. In place of in-person attendance, members of the public can observe and offer comments at this meeting via Zoom: VIEW MEETING VIA ZOOM APP OR ZOOM.COM AT: zoom.us/join using Webinar ID: 971 3897 0399 -or- YOU CAN DIAL-IN USING YOUR PHONE UNITED STATES: + 1 (669) 900-6833 Access Code: 971 3897 0399 A. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance B. Public Communications This is the time and place for the general public to address the Commission on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. The Commission may not discuss any issue not included on the Agenda but set the matter for a subsequent meeting. C. Consent Calendar - None D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE - M&A HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APNs 0226-572-01 to - 10. Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00558. D2. LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request to construction a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low(VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09. Hillside Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00973. D3. LOCATED IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS —Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site -APN: 0225-181-73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, VARIANCE, AND MINOR EXCEPTION File Numbers: SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787. D4. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception and Tree Removal Permit File Numbers: SUBTT20334, DRC2020- 00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140. E. General Business E1. LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS - A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087. F. Director Announcements G. Commission Announcements H. Adjournment If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting,please contact the Planning Department at(909)477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION The Planning Commission encourages free expression of all points of view. To allow all persons to speak, given the length of the agenda, please keep your remarks brief. If others have already expressed your position, you may simply indicate that you agree with a previous speaker. If appropriate, a spokesperson may present the views of your entire group. To encourage all views and promote courtesy to others, the audience should refrain from clapping, booing or shouts of approval or disagreement from the audience. HPC/PC Regular Meeting Agenda — May 12, 2021 Page 2of3 For each of the items listed under "PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS", the public will be provided an opportunity to speak. To address the Planning Commission via Zoom App, click the "Raise Hand" button when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. On Zoom via phone, you can also raise your hand by pressing star *, then 9 when the item you wish to comment on is being discussed. Comments will be limited to 5 minutes per individual. If a large number of individuals wish to speak on an item, the Chairman may limit the time to 3 minutes in order to provide an opportunity for more people to be heard. Speakers will be alerted when their time is up, and no further comments will be permitted. If you wish to speak concerning an item not on the agenda, you may do so under "PUBLIC COMMENTS." As an alternative to participating in the meeting, you may submit comments in writing to Elizabeth.Thornhill@cityofrc.us by 12:OOpm on the date of the meeting. Written comments will be distributed to the Commissioners and included in the record. AVAILABILITY OF STAFF REPORTS Copies of the staff reports or other documentation to each agenda item are available at www.CitvofRC.us. APPEALS Any interested party who disagrees with the City Planning Commission decision may appeal the Commission's decision to the City Council within 10 calendar days. Any appeal filed must be directed to the City Clerk's Office and must be accompanied by a fee of $3,206 for all decisions of the Commission. (Fees are established and governed by the City Council). I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, May 6, 2021, seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive. HPC/PC Regular Meeting Agenda — May 12, 2021 Page 3 of 3 RANCHOCITY OF DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE - M&A HOLDINGS, LLC - A Design Review for a request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and Equestrian Overlay District; APNs 0226-572-01 to -10. File number: DRC2019- 00558. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Design Review DRC2019-00558 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to construct 10-single-family residences on a previously approved 10-lot subdivision. BACKGROUND AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is located at the east terminus of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive (Exhibit A). These east-west streets were constructed as part of an unrelated subdivision (Tract 18122)to the west of the project site. On August 8, 2018, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 to subdivide a 7.17-acre lot into 10 lots for the future development of 10 single- family homes and Variance DRC2018-00566 to allow a wall height of up to 23 feet on the project's south boundary (parallel the 210 Freeway) for sound attenuation purposes. As part of the approved subdivision, Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive will be extended to the east and a new north-south street (Echo Mountain Place) will be constructed to connect the two to form a loop. Over the last year, on-site grading has commenced, and the applicant has submitted the necessary Design Review application for the construction of 10 single-family homes. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Residential District1,2 North Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (VL) , 2 Residential Residential District 210 Freeway San Bernardino County Flood n/a n/a South Control District Access Road Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (L) Residential Residential District East Etiwanda Creek and the San Flood East Sevaine Flood Control Basin Control/Utility Open Space (OS) District '2 Corridor West Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (VL) 12 Residential Residential District 1 —Etiwanda Specific Plan,2—Equestrian Overlay District ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant is proposing 3 architectural styles: Spanish, Italianate, and Craftsman. As demonstrated on the project plans, all homes appropriately reflect the materials, textures, and design elements associated with the architectural style proposed (Exhibit B). Houses proposed in the Spanish style feature S-tile roofs, white paint tones, arches, and wrought iron railings, while Craftsman style homes contain shingle/wood siding, a stone base, and exposed rafters. Italianate styled homes feature Mediterranean/Tuscan inspired elements, such as stone veneers, arched windows, and earth-toned colors. RCMC Section 17.122.010 requires at least 3 residences within the 10-unit development to be single-story homes. The applicant is proposing 3 single-story homes and 7 two-story homes, which complies with this requirement. Additionally, RCMC Table 17.122.010-1 requires there to be a minimum of 3 distinct floor plans among the 10 homes, which the applicant has also provided. All homes comply with all applicable setback and height requirements as prescribed in the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Each lot will be separated by a 6-foot high decorative block wall on both sides, with a combination 3-foot decorative block wall and a 3-foot wrought iron fence/gate along the rear of each lot. As previously approved by Variance DRC2018-00556, a sound wall comprised of decorative block measuring approximately 22 feet will be constructed along the project's southern boundary adjacent to the 210 Freeway for sound attenuation purposes. The project is located within the Equestrian Overlay District and all lots in the previously approved subdivision measures at least 20,000 square feet. Therefore, all properties are eligible for equestrian animal-keeping. All houses will have direct access to a 15-foot wide equestrian trail, running along the rear of all 10 lots. The placement and configuration of the trails were established during the previous approval of the subdivision. Per the City's Trail Implementation Plan, gates and step-throughs will be installed at all trail entrances to control vehicle and equestrian access. The site plan (Exhibit B) shows the conceptual location of a 12 by 48-foot corral area for each lot. All corral areas will be located at least 70 feet away from the edge any neighboring primary residence, in compliance with RCMC Section 17.88.020B. 2 All front yards will be landscaped with a variety of drought-tolerant shrubs, groundcovers, and trees, in compliance with the City's residential landscape requirements per RCMC Sec. 17.56.070. B. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted for the original subdivision approval on November 17, 2015. No neighborhood meeting for the subject application, as the current request is for the construction of 10-single-family homes on a previously approved 10-lot subdivision intended for single-family homes. C. Trails Advisory Committee: Trails for the subdivision were previously reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on September 9, 2015, as part of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 which was subsequently approved by the Planning Commission. D. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on April 6, 2021. The Committee recommended approval of the project as proposed to the Planning Commission, as noted in the Design Review Committee minutes (Exhibit C). E. Public Art: This project is required to provide public art as outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Based on 10 residential units, the total art value required per Section 17.124.020.0 is $7,500. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy of the first unit in the subdivision. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Commission certified a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 8, 2018 (State Clearinghouse #2016021034) through Resolutions 18-48 and 18-49. The project does not raise or create new environmental impacts not already considered in the Mitigated Negative Declaration. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, police, fire, and school services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: One of the City Council's core values is "providing and nurturing a high quality of life for all." The high-quality architectural design and architectural variety provided by the project supports this core value by continuing to provide first-class development within the City for the benefit of future and current residents. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property 3 owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site. To date, no written correspondence, phone calls, or in person inquiries have been received regarding the project notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A-Aerial Exhibit B — Project Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments (April 6, 2021) and Action Agenda Draft Resolution 21-23 of Approval for Design Review DRC2019-00558 Conditions of Approval 4 V —Gypsum Prive � �Gypsum Prive Gypsum OriVB i .N y.� - !t r T'Pq Gopley Pr Cop1eY➢r Copley Dr Copley Ur .�� y. i �.�'.. 3 .•Lh`�R �$$R :•Access.Rd - -.Access Rd- - Aceess Rd, _ AO` - Foothill Fwy a - '41 e ! Proposeds z -Home Tractfor:10 0 age 9 : d some&ueh coun wlnl"ln1 Coon o sya� y► -- - it E3 n . _ = ShareeAwad Reunion photographers / 1 r. V A.V. I '_ CopleyDr. & Wilshire Dr., Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92739 OWNER: SHAREEF AWAD cobAlt .a1231 N. CACTUS AVENUE #D, �; � � {._ iF fib° t REAL O, 923755 T Boot Camp Cucamonga CONTACT: SHAREEF AWAD Plan 1 - Spanish Style EMAIL: shareefawad@sbcglobal.net GyR�m arivv GYPwrn Drrry � � SITE ADDRESS: TRACT 19917 SOUTH OF 6291 RAINDROP PLACE, _ - RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 92739 ARCHITECT: ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE INC. 4 d to ventana K e Ham s 17087 ORANGE WAY d @ _ FONTANA, CA 92335 �Y D�1Ye CopleyDnva Cop1e,D lye ��Qy aye A,ei. TEL: (909) 355-6688 CONTACT: DOUG ANDRESEN EMAIL: doug.andresen@aaifirm.com Access Rd 4 - AaAe s Rd Access'- - ` - t * - - CIVIL ENGINEER: DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES _ 4141 E. INLAND EMPIRE BLVD., SUITE 250 - - ONTARIO, CA 91764 � 2+p® FOOthill Fwy Fonthlll Fwy c�=�] - � � �� f ar (909) 912-7359 _ N * A i CONTACT: ANGEL CESAR P.E. EMAIL: angel.cesar@deainc.com ' Ftivhpr Dr •j'•'s4 me nr „ BUILDING DATA: U, ,orlon l`r - - °' - '"- + " r APN: 0226-102-30 r ZONING: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN -VL Green crone or .r O leranrct Go gIC Victori RV and ��.: ".�:.ry. ,.:�� � c�= `{ ' -. 1 a , ;a ° OCCUPANCY: GROUP R-3/U t-I eaatstara eQ - CONSTRUCTION. TYPE V-B tzt FIRE SPRINKLERS: NFPA 13D SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIRED PROJECT SITE Vicinity MapPlan 2 - Italian Style Plan 3 - Cra tsmam Style PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PROPOSED 10 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES y W TOTAL GROSS AREA: 7.16 AC H \ Existing 3'-0" High Decorative Existing Drainage Swale to Existing 3'-0" High Decorative Masonry Existing Drainage Swale TOTAL NET AREA: 5.74 AC Mason Wall With WI Fence Above Remain Wall With WI Fence Above to Remain to Remain LOTS: 10 LOTS \ to Remain Masonry TOTAL NUMBER F L - - - - - - - - - - - - - � � H Vehicle Gate with Step- Existing Sound Wall to Remain Through Side Access y \� y \ 15'wide Equestrian Vehicle Gate o 7Local Trail with Side Access Existing 6'-0" High Masonry 15'wide Equestrian T-0" High Decorative Masonry Vehicle Gate with Vehicle Gate with Step- 7- Easement15'wide Equestrian Local Trail Existing 6'-0" High Wall to Remain Easement Wal With WI Fence Above Side Access Through Side Access Easement Masonry Wall to Remain 214.89' o o 95.00' 5'46-0" C 91.95' 91.50' 95.00' o 0 0 236.63' Y r cV N r r r Y o Existing Chain Link CU co o Fence to Be Removed a� 12'x 48' I ExistingWood 5'wide Drainage o Ln W v 3-0 High Decorative 5'wide Drainage Easement Masonry Wall With Easement ,,� Corral Area 5'wide Drainage 0, T-0" High Decorative Fence to Be co 6'-0" High I //// - \`--\ I 6-0" High Easement `' Mason Wall With WI Removed - W I Fence Above _ _ \\\� i ` 'i//// �\ Wrought Iron Fence Fence Above F---� I� �I rn l Wrought Iron Fence I I I I I I I I O of - w o L'----------- �' -- - ---- �' -----------�8' zoi o 0 98'-1" Corral Area 12'x 48' Cq \ / o I Y 6'-0" High Decorative Corral Area 0 6'-0" High Decorative 00 121 7 % co (60' Min. Rear Setback) LOt 8 30'-0" Masonry Wall - Masonry Wall - 30'-0" Lot 1 (60' Min. Rear Setback) " Plan 2A I N U) I Plan 2C I Y LO Setback 4 922 SF Sound Wall Per x Front Setback 12'x 48' 4 922 SF Acoustical I Corral Area b a, c, v a� Corral Area �T Analysis Report r - r E ti i% 15-0 q I 6'-0" High Decorative _ U) ;� � o - m Masonry Wall o W M 0 N `m � o r E rn zo �� rn N M ^�M Maintain 70' �O Y g3� Min to Adjacent E o rn - H o N N o o o o �04; rr Homes N N N - - 237.57' 1 a) $o E 212.39' - - ozo _ N ir> o o 0 0 r rr "' � 6'-0" High F---� H 60-0" 25-0 Decorative O 1 Setback 10'-0"10'-0" 4'-0" 4,-0„ Masonry Wall I O co 4'-0" I T-6" 36'-0" T-6" 4'-0" 6 T-6" 18'-0" 18'-0" T-6" r� t-I Min. Min. 6 12'x 48' O i 11 84'-6" Lot 9� 6,r 6„ 10'-0"10'-0" Corral Area 60' Min. Rear Setback) Plan 1 C 18'-0" 18'-0" v N _ L I 25'-0" 60'-0" 30'-0" i o ry I � � 4,553 SF o Min. Min. 110'-6" I � � I o o o Setback I oo (30'Min.) _ O 12'x 48' �I~ Corral Area 30'-0" I (60' Min. Rear Setback) •� Lot 7� Lot 6� Lot 5� Lot 4� 5'-0° q o Lot 2� �I Setback q Plan 2C Plan 3A Plan 3B Plan 2B r Plan 1A I '� cr, 3'-0" High Decorative I ,922 SF 5,414 SF 5,414 SF 4,922 SF s 4,674 SF 3'-0" High Decorative �+ „ 9 I v Masonry Wall With 20'-5 20-0 Existing 6-0 High C I " r r� I N Masonry Wall With Decorative Masonry Wall to WI Fence Above.� WI Fence Above 6'-0" High Decorative _ (� � 6'-0" High � s Remain Mason Wall Y Q 20'Min. rY _ u ( ) - Decorative _ -1 ° Masonry Wall zo 7'- - - - - 'oL 11, 7 U v 209.89' o IJL I r 6'-0" High Deco tive \ _ I00 238 71 9�C Masonry Wall N W q ifl I I N o o S ~ N to co v I N N -- 30'-01, o 16'-0" - 16'-0" 16'-0" - 16'-0" o -- ' o �I U Lo r 0 C � Lo r " I �I " r r " Setback Cl) _ M gcL 12'x 48' S'-0 15r-2"4-8 c-� o 0 o co o � / 30-0 I� i t q io Setback Corral Area 24-9' A \ 71.95 - - - 91.95' - - 91 50' - - - 72.05 / I s o i Corral ifl LOt 3� 113'-7" o (o '� Lot 10 \ / Plan 3C 60' Min. Rear Setback 80'-8" o 5 414 S F ( ) j L Plan 1 B 1� \ 60 \ 160' Min. Rear Setback) 4,674 SF \ - - ��, � Echo Mountain Place o o i L--� o. - - - - - - - - - - - - ' \ CD CD M o T-0" High Decorative r �� Masonry Wall With 60 6'-0" High ,�� WI Fence Above Combo = S io � Masonry Wall � - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 6'-0" High Combo Community Trail y b 286A8' Masonry Wall b y Sound Wall Per L IT il I Acoustical 40'-0" J 319.26' Analysis Report 8 wide Community PLAN 1 (ELEVATION A & B) Site Plan / Sequence of Drawings DR Easement 1" - 30'-0" \ Number Description FIRST FLOOR 4,257 . FT. LOFT CASITA AREA 417 SQ. FT. - PL1 Site Plan cry TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,674 SQ. FT. PL1.1 Site wall Plan PL2 Floor Plan (Plan 1) GARAGE (1 - CAR) 285 SQ. FT. ( ) � Fire Prevention Notes: PL3 Front Elevations Plan 1 This site/project is located in the designated Wild-Urban Interface Fire Area. (2 - CAR) 609 SQ. FT. PL4 Ext. Elevations (Plan 1) The following conditions apply: CALIFORNIA ROOM 680 SQ. FT. PL5 Floor Plan (Plan 2) Tract no. 19917 U 1. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinklersystems are to be in MASTER PATIO 130 SQ. FT. PL6 Front Elevations (Plan 2) compliance with Canlifornia Building Code Chapter 7A,the CAlifornia Residential Code, and the PL7 Ext. Elevations (Plan 2) NOOK PATIO 104 SQ. FT. Fire District Standard 49-1 PL8 Floor Plan (Plan 3) Proposed 10-Home Tract or: 2. Landscaping, vegetation managment, fuel reduction, and other wildland fire safety TOTAL NOW CONDITIONED SPACE 1,808 SQ. FT. PL9 Front Elevations (Plan 3) p features and practices are required to comply with all applicable provisions of Fire District TOTAL FOOTPRINT 6,065 SQ. FT. ( ) Shareef Awad SEA AR�h'i Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. PL10 Ext. Elevations Plan 3 �����as gnd,P 3. A site specific or project specifice fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The PLAN 1 (ELEVATION C) PLAN 2 PLAN 3 Lot Coverage Schedule 1 of 11 Tilte Sheet CO le DY. Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 92739 * C 14504 Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2 of 11 Precise Grading Plan FIRST FLOOR 4,136 SQ. FT. FIRST FLOOR 2,454 SQ. FT. FIRST FLOOR 3,059 SQ. FT. Lot # Plan Name Elevation Type Lot Area Footprint Lot Coverage (%) 3 of 11 sections 20 Jan. 2021 N� 12-31-21 �Q Building &Safety Services Department Notes: Z 9 RENEWAL 1 2C Italian 26,048 SF 4,427 SF 17.00 4 of 11 Details&Sections Sheet 4' DATE This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with LOFT CASITA AREA 417 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR 2,469 SQ. FT. LOFT CASITA AREA 2,353 SQ. FT. F o FO ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,553 SQ. FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 4,922 SQ. FT. TOTAL FLOOR AREA 5,414 SQ. FT. 2 1A Spanish 26,195 SF 6,065 SF 23.15 5 of 11 Private Storm Drain & Horse Corral Location Plan F CALF Plan and/or the most current edition of the CA Building Code including all local ordinances and 3 3C Italian 28,027 SF 4,956 SF 17.68 6 of 11 WQMP Site Plan 18-3317 standards.When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings 4 2B Craftsman 25,475 SF 4,427 SF 17.38 7 of 11 Erosion Control Plan LO GARAGE (1 - CAR) 263 SQ. FT. COVERED ENTRY 251 SQ. FT. COVERED ENTRY 99 SQ. FT. 5 3B Craftsman 24,790 SF 4,956 SF 19.99 including energy and structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in 8 of 11 Erosion Control Plan accordance with the stricter regulations of the approved Fire protection Plan (if applicable)for (2 - CAR) 585 SQ. FT. GARAGE (3 - CAR) 859 SQ. FT. GARAGE (1 - CAR) 370 SQ. FT. 9 of 11 Cut/Fill Ma 6 3A Spanish 24,912 SF 4,956 SF 19.89 p the development and current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local CALIFORNIA ROOM 627 SQ. FT. CALIFORNIA ROOM 558 SQ. FT. 2 - CAR 552 SQ. FT. ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to beequipped with automatic fire all ( ) 7 2C Italian 25,474 SF 4,427 SF 17.38 10 pf 11 Conditions of Approval o� qMASTER PATIO 100 SQ. FT. BALCONY 105 SQ. FT. CALIFORNIA ROOM 540 SQ. FT. 11 of 11 ConditionsofA royal • sprinklers.A soils report is required for new structures. Vegetation must be design and installed 8 2A Spanish 23,487 SF 4,427 SF 18.85 Approval �' in accordance to the guidelines from the RCFPD for sites located in the VHFHSZ fire area. NOOK PATIO 91 SQ. FT. TOTAL NON - CONDITIONED SPACE 1,773 SQ. FT. BALCONY 147 SQ. FT. 9 1 C Italian 23,225 SF 5,802 SF 24.98 CIAo TOTAL NOW CONDITIONED SPACE 1,666 SQ. FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4,427 SQ. FT. TOTAL NOW CONDITIONED SPACE 1,708 SQ. FT. 10 1B Craftsman 24,628 SF 6,065 SF 24.63 1 of Two Conceptual Landscaping Plan Site Plan TOTAL FOOTPRINT 5,802 SQ. FT. TOTAL FOOTPRINT 4,956 SQ. FT. 252,262 SF 2 of Two Conceptual Landscaping Plan \2020 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. ■ I I Existing T-0" High Decorative Existing Drainage Swale to Existing T-0" High Decorative Masonry Existing Drainage Swale \ \ Masonry Wall With WI Fence Above Remain Wall With WI Fence Above to Remain to Remain \ \ to Remain \ _ _ _ _ _ _ Vehicle Gate with Step- \ \ J O Through Side Access \ - . - - - - - - - - - - - - -o - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — — - - - - - - - - ! - - - - — — — — — - — — - - - - Existing Sound Wall to Remain \ - - - - - - - - - - - - -� — _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _ — - - . _ — - - - _ 15'wide Equestrian Vehicle Gate Existing6'-0" High Mason Local Traill Vehicle Gate with o Local Trail Existing 6'-0" High � Easement with Side Access g Masonry 15'wide Equestrian 3'-0" High Decorative Masonry Vehicle Gate with Step- _� — 15'wide Equestrian 9 9 Wall to Remain Side Access Through Side Access - Easement Masonry Wall to Remain O Easement Wall With WI Fence Above ;% 214.89' — — — — O 95.00' 0 91.95' — — 91.50' — — —� — — 95.00' — — — — O — — — — — — — o 236.63, FEO o F I F I F I F o o F o Existing Chain Link F F F F I O Fence to Be Removed 6'-0" High I F O O I A 6'-0" High F o Existing Wood A I S-0" High Decorative S-0" High Decorative Decorative ' Fence to Be Z Decorative � I N 6'-0" High g g 6'-0" High F Removed Masonry Wall Masonry Wall with 3' Masonry Wall with 3' Masonry Wall I Wrought Iron Fence Wrought Iron Fence High Wrought Iron High Wrought Iron Fence Above Fence Above zo OI I I � � � oO Lot 8 Lot 1 Z F 6'-0" High Decorative - 6'-0" High Decorative F Masonry Wall Masonry Wall 6-0" High Decorative Masonry Wall cn I I io � ti rn rn N N O C) N N N I — A A Q 212.39' A - - I A I — 237.57' A A "Tt 6'-0" High Decorative I I 6-0" High � Z Masonry Wall I Decorative OA A A I Masonry Wall 1 Lot 9 Cn O N � I p o oN F o I 10'-3" I I C? F I CD -40 D I I I I S-0" High Decorative • Lot 7 Lot 6 Lot 5 Lot 4 q Lot 2 g Masonry Wall With I N •H WI Fence Above Existing 6-0" High U I I I Decorative Masonry Wall to _ctRemain — 6-0" High Decorative Masonry Wall A — — w A U I 209.89' A A A I iv 238.71' A N A '4 I ao A A A I I N 6'-0" High I Decorative H Masonry Wall I F I I I 6-0",15'-2"4'-8" 24'-9" 6'-0" High Decorative \\ 71.95' _ _ _ _ 91 95; _ _ 91.50' _ _ _ _ 72.05' / H Masonry Wall Lot 10 F Lot 3 71 o \ / I� op S-0" High Decorative I O �Q Masonry Wall With �o --- _ Echo Mountain Place _ / WI Fence Above H F I CIA �,� 8' wide Community II F ^'` A Easement Community Trail 286.48' A E Z D C E B� 319.26' O 40'-0" 246'-6" 334'-11" 314'-3" 5'-0" N -� SOUND WALL v — Combo Decorative Combo Decorative Combo Decorative — Combo Decorative oMasonry Screen Over Masonry Screen Over Masonry Screen Over Masonry Screen Over Retaining Wall Retaining Wall Retaining Wall Retaining Wall Site Wall Plan Wall Schedule Per Lot 1 it = 30'-011 Lot# Type Height .o F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" v v 1 A I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" ti F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" 2 v A I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" o� 3 A Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" E Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 5'-6" High with 1' Retaining 6'-0" S F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" v 4 A I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" c�q F I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" o� 5 A I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" S o� 6 1AA=Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" 7 A I Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" 8 A Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" U F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" O Masonry Wall-Retaining&Sound-Split Face Perimeter(E) 24'-0" Z Masonry Wall-Retaining&Sound-Split Face Perimeter 20'-0" Proposed 10-Home Tract for: SEA AR�y 9 Shareef Awad �� gas And,. A Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" 1 oo°' �V F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" CO le Dr. & Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamorl a CA 92739 Z Masonry Wall- Retaining&Sound-Split Face Perimeter 20'-0" * C-14504 10 20 Jan. 2021 N9� RE Ej— �C` Al DATE A Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 6'-0"High 6'-0" OF CA0 D Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-6" High with 5' Retaining 6'-0" 18-3317 F Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 3'-0" High With 3'-0"Wrought Iron Fence Above 6'-0" �+ Z Masonry Wall-Retaining&Sound-Split Face Perimeter 20'-0" d+ Echo Mountain Place B Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 4'-10" High with 2'-4" Retaining 6'-0" H C Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 5'-8" High with 8" Retaining 6'-0" SleteO E all Plan N Masonry Wall-Decorative Screen Wall 5'-6" High with 1' Retaining 6'-0" H ©2020 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. 74'-6" 01 " ", ", " 14'-10" 18'-9" 6'-9" 29'-2" 6'-0" 1 -4 14-6 17-9 6-9 28-2 6-0 00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - \/ o Master Bedroom Patio ❑❑ Master SFer Covered Patio 92 SF /\ /\ I California Room I I California Room ❑ 617 sF ❑ I - I I - M SF 71 O o ® ❑\ I I � � ❑\ I I N ® 1-1 Ell Master Bath M Master Bath N 231 SF N 251 SF O � Pool Bath O SF � —Pool I Bath I I � ❑ I I O Master Bedroom ❑ Linen Master Bedroom Linen 372 SF 353 SF Toilet �p N co ZO 1 N o0 J J %i ❑ Wet Bar — — OVENETU Wet Bar _ — — OVEN II - - - - Master W.I.C. II Master W.I.C. ti 107 SF 2'-0 107 SF II Great Room II 732 SF ❑ — — — ❑ 0 0 1-Car Garage 0 0 267 SF Kitchen ❑ Kitchen 1-Car Garage 7'-7" 0 0 299 SF o - 00 7 7 0 0 299 SF Great Room N 245 SF co co _ a o 00 N N �, a 70 SF N N Laundry Pantry N N CP LaundryPantry N 127 SF o 59 SF ° b) 127 SF o 59 SF F - - - - - - - - - - 0 .� i i L � 7 ~ II I �, � ❑ ° l o0) L LI 0 ❑ - - IN IN IN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - q 12'-2" 16'-2" 12'-6" 8'-2" 19'-6" 6'-0" 13'-2" 16'-2" 12'-6' 8'-2" 20'-6" 6'-0" rn Nook Covered Patio Nook Nook Covered Patio Nook q 89 SF 38 SF Dining q q 102 SF 38 SIF Dinin o 21 SF I I I I I I I I I I I I I n (V LL - - - - - — — — — - -IN (O (V ❑ IF 23'-11" — — — — — — — ❑ ❑ W.I.C. II W.I.C. II 00 50 SF in 50 SF Ln 14'-4" i I i I II I o � � I II o ° Bedroom 2 _ __ Bedroom 2 179 SF o 191 SF 2-Car Garage -- -- O Powder o N __ __ O o der M N 557 SF -- -- N -- -- - — ❑ 2-Car Garage - II II ❑❑ W.I.C. CD II 581 SF W.I.C. 8 SF II Bath 2 43 SF II Bath 2 M Foye Foyer 457 SF 457 SF a' I i I - - - - - - - - - - ❑ o - - - - - - - - - - El - xxxxxxxxxxx I - J I 27'4" 11'-2" 5'-7" 12'-5" 28'-4" 11'-2" 5'-7" 13'-5" 0 0 i� Bath 3 X q Bath 3 q 47 SF Bedroom 3 47 SF Bedroom 3 Office O 147 SF O 156 SF _ 209 SF Cn r) N N ice i 216 SF H 5,-6„ 9,-0„ o 0 5,-6„ H 5'-6" 9'-0" 5'-6" 01 H i H -+-� 12'-0" 6'-0" 16'-11" 20'-0" 13'-7" 6'-0" 01 12'-0" 6'-0" 17'-11" 20'-0" 14'-7" 6'-0" 7 76'-6" 4'-6" _ Floor Plan - Elevation C Floor Plan (Elevattion A B) 3116" — 11-0" 3116" — 11-01' W 20'-0" 10'-0" 10'-0" dle H W.I.C. ° o W.I.C. \ 48 SF II zo � °47 F IN H -4'-5"- 15'-7" Ozo -- -- N Casita 238 SF Area Schedule Alt (Elevation C) Area Schedule (Elevation A &B) Proposed 10-Homes Tract For: 5�� ARC Name Area Name Area Shareef Awad a Floor Area 4136 SF Floor Area 4255 SF ✓ (� DIN Loft Casita Area 417 SF Loft Casita Area 417 SF CO le Dr. Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 92739 * $ Living Space 4553 SF Living Space 4672 SF 4504 1-Car Garage 263 SF 1-Car Garage 285 SF 9 Oct. 2019 cP� Ken..N C 112-31-11-19 c� 2-Car Garage 585 SF 2-Car Garage 609 SF ■ Op F&I, California Room 627 SF California Room 678 SF 18-3317-1 Master Patio 100 SF Master Patio 128 SF ' ■ ■ CIA20'-0" Nook Patio 91 SF Nook Patio 104 SF ONon-Conditioned Space 1666 SF Non-Conditioned Space 1804 SIFPlan 1 Loft Floor Plan (Elevations A B C) . , 3/16" = 1'-0" O ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. Floor Plans ................... .. .................................................. ........................ ................ .. .................. ...... ........ ................... ................. ■ 'P ( - is pJyi�_r ........... ................ .... -{�....................... ,, el f r b� I xi M3 M4 M1 M2 ................ .......... .. . .............................. ..................... Elevation A L 0 t Elevation A Gable Vent Elevation A Tile Frame �•>ti 1• .................. ... ................... . .. .................................................. ................... . .. ............................. .................. . '? t ......................... ......................... ................................. ..... .................. .4. �--•�_-t1-^�.r �� ,�..r���y1 1 O D - - _. — ---- V ryi i, •-.• ` •� . `, q��l k , . .n .. _ ......... .... ....................... f - •; , I 1 ` - i. S ` - ...... ........ ............. ...... .................. ... 1 - -.._ �� 4 'Z S• 'r { '�• 1/. 7•' • ............... ... .......... .... ................... ... • .......... ............................. ................ Elevation A Front Door Elevation A Gara Garage Door Elevation A Balcon a x ►' 3 -� •. �. �\ a .i _ - ! .�: y 7'�� �; .a } [�' .' r:. `-',,, i. ,�.,'� . - - ......... ................................ ..............................................^ ........ ......... ................................ ..........�...................... .................. - + �•: i 'may; wi y. ..,. � -'3� k' _ - - "A" - Spanish Elevation "A " SpanishStyle Mark . Designation Manufacturer Color Information M1 MAIN STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS "PUEBLO WHITE"DET675 1/4 It = 1'-0 11 M2 FASCIA/TRIM. DUNN EDWARDS. "ESPRESSO MACCHIATO"DET680 " M3 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARDS ."CHERRY COLA"DEA156 . . . . . . . ... . M4 ROOF TILES BORAL . . "BARCELONA"CASA GRANDE.BLEND Y � r' + ............. *� - .................................................... ................... i �� � a --r_\ - - - .. .. ... .. .. ............................. ................ M2 M4 M3 I f - �• -t ..�.-- - -- - -- -.-..,- + .. ..... ......... .............. ................................... .................. M5 M7 M1 M6 y �i _ _ - - - `. r. .4 i�R'• wL .......... . . . . . . . ... 1 P - '�• - e - S ............. ............ . ` Elevation B Garage Door Elevation B Deck Railing Elevation B Outlooker •{ ' t r \ ..�_.... �' - - _ - j .- - - 7 - r-r - -- -- - - ..... ...... ......... ....................................... ..... ...... ......... ..................... .............. .. IL ....... ................ .. .. ....... ................ .............................. .................. ................... ................ .. .................. ................. �►. f . Y I ., k - r+ - ., j ..................... ........... ......... ..... ............... ................... r t r , I s4v+ a� si t `y�' � v`" � -`�_ --s �s ?•.�- ��'�`.r. .�� �r _ _ - .� L- +.Y - -'.'� .r.--� - _ .. .. ... -a = y 5 .' err f i .5 v 7C►� ' �.'� + . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... .............. ... .. .... .. ............ . .... Elevation ig t tlevation..B Front Door Elevation B Shutters.. ...... ................ . .. . . ....... ................. . ............................................................ Elevation "B Craftsman Stile . ... .... .... . .... .... .. . . 11417 - 1'-0" ...... .. .................. .... ................. Craftsman Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information M1 MAIN STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS "FLINTSTONE"DE6221 H _'� M2 WALL HORIZONTAL SIDING DUNN EDWARDS "BROODING STORM"DET604 M3 WALL SHINGLE SIDING DUNN EDWARDS . "MISSION TRAIL"DE6223 M4 r .�..--•-:--�- � s �'� ., I � M4 FASCIA/TRIM DUNN EDWARDS "WHISPER"DEW340 M5 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR&SHUTTERS DUNN.EDWARDS "MISSION TRAIL"DE6223 H - STONE VENEER BORAL "COUNTRY LEDGESTONE"ECHO RIDGE PROFILE M7 ROOF TILES BORAL. "CHARCOAL BLEND'SLATE 900 AV> M3 M5 M1 M2 - .---_- - - - ......... .. . ............................. ..................... ....................................... \ 7. - ..................................... ......... ................... f . ............................ ................. ... �. ... A s. . ■ :-+-^-i-j"-•� --� .'-��•-•�-- �`-� • _ �i, ............................... ..... .. ................. ................. Elevation C Li ht Elevation C balcon ....... . ► -- ,-{ y _=_ ��-.= -�' f .................. � -:�� -"�"'-T^1 _ate- .�� _ - �`^_.__.� - •• _ _. F_ ---�' •_ - - - "- -_... _ �. .�, • - -T — J r [ f rim .......................... �... Y. � ' j� •� �. ` -,� - -)' ,. I.... .............. .. —14 _ r , 4 ..... ........ ................ �. - - a a r..H 4 - .......... ............................................ _ A' �{ �i .�: 'F d f' ....... ......... .................. �:L{ �#`" .� ' -�- Proposed 10-Homes Tract For: +� +�. �'i',►.�, ,-�� _�.y .� -� �- �I• ,�. •f. � 1�111 ! (-,,..� .-I' - 'rr�.'. �1 �r�i � .. ;� 1 - - _ _- GS`�V A`�?> � k t, I.. ��� :_�� M � �i�` .�•'- •• . - -♦r, �wI, il' F� w �,1 �1•l1� f w 5 ^1�,i .• ` ,{ ��1 1 r �� �Y '�J C'CJ �D�(�-�,�7. f Sharee Awad ti Col Dr. & Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 92739 Elevation C Front Door Elevation C Gara e Door 9O ct 2019 2 - - Re n 1 31 19 ti ll 11 "C" - Italian/Tuscan 18-3317-1 Elevation C Italian Style • c� V it = 1'-0" Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information ....... �?. M1 MAIN STUCCO....................... DUNN EDWARDS "SAND DOLLAR"DE6171.... M2 FASCIA/TRIM.................... DUNN EDWARDS... "'G.RANGE'H.ALL".DET69'5 ... M3 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARDS. ' ''MAYAIV CHOCOLATE"DET693 iirk7 Plan. ... .................................................. ............................... ............. .... ................... M4 STONE VENEER BORAL ,PALISADAES"ANCIENT VILLA PROFILE . . ................ ....M5........ROOF TILES..................... BORAL ,,.GARNET BLEND"BARCELONA PROFILE .... .................. O • . ............................ Front ... ................... H ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. ... ............................................ ... ................... .................................................. ... ................... ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. .............................. .................. ............................................................ .......... ................................. .......................... ................................. .......... ................................. ............................................................ .......... ................................. .......................... ................................. .......... ................................. ....................................... ................... Spanish Style CrafLsman Style Italian Style -----_ -7, % % �- .' ��������,������������������������,���������'ll�������� 11 .. --- ---- I I ��.... 11��� - ''..", 6 . -.- - _ _ _- __ -- - � - _ _ _ �--� %11 _____--__- - — �- _- ._- _--:iz-i:-z-����-�-fl-��,- --- --.-Z - - - :::::I . .. - - �� - ir A -5� I �� -- %41 -- - -. --.- - - - r ::I l ,r - ]--]�i r, %, � . -- ---- = - - --- =-_-_-= - - ---_-_ - _ - - -_- - _-_-- - _ - 1. - - ..." _ .._._w__.. ` I _. 7 _��� ' - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - _ _w - --- --- -= - - - - --- - - - - - -. _-.-_- - - —. - -� - - - - - .` —_ - - � -� --- _ _.. _ __ _ -- - . -- t . il� wi. - _ _ _ - _ _ _�- ___— _ ., _ _ _ _ _ - % _.._...,�r.•_..,,__.._... r _ _ _ _ - - ___ ____ -_-_.__- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -77' - �___ y T I` - - - - - - - - - - 1 i - _ -. _-_____ _._._.- -- _ _ _. 7 to --- - - - - --- -- - - - - - - - '- -' - - -- - -' " - - = - - -- - -- - --- ---- - - - - - - - r vv�vy.. T - ' - - - - - _ .. . . _ , _ �._ .,r_-_� rTT .i,_ __ _ ___ __-- ____ _ -. _ _ _ _ I Tri � - - -� _ --- - - -T •-- - - _ __ ��:---z � - - ----- - - -- _ - - - - zp — - — - — �T - -- -- T. ==__ --= - - - N L . - _-_� � - 's _ _ __. -... -_- _ --.---_��-.-- - _ - _ N / ' - }-y• _ - - - - -_ -- - -- '� _ � :� - ter'= " � - y`%' - -- 17 O = / -r O - - o = t - N I NIII I .. I 11 11 *1' t �= 11 I I - N I� _- - - -- N -yII III .-- �- (O yy} ( i. 1Pw*mL7L=L74 4 — - 0 . LILA _ - -- --_ _ _ _ - _ --- - --i _ _ ,I _- _ -H E"FE-1 1� 1, - __ - __ -- - - - _-_____ - - - �. __ - - - - I` - - - - Front Front Front 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" �J. _ - _==_ - --- - -------= - - -- T .�Z��- _ - - _ - _ _ - _ - _ - - - - -- - _ _ .I --- i-��-r z 4i ���- �--•I -� iJ - - - `J i l � 'z t.,=;+. `- _ _ - _ - _ - - t �=._ _ �_ - vv v-v _vv�v N _! ram- _ ri�� r �z ��T� _-' - - - w- ;S- T i _ - 1 im . . . .. - ^ _ T --- r - _ �- T —N - _. �� O L-- N - - -- '- J N —� - p� f -- - O - A0, - .1 M _ 4 - -- -�_ .N Y— �.' —— - I (O - - - _ _ - =TOO=--=' `_--=__' --_ _-C_. ii _ - _ - _ - _ _ - --�;7-;� ��- ��- -�--�-- -- ...; T �- - II -I I I - I - I I I . .-- I ��S-------'- --- ......--A I - I I -� I 11 Im �' I I Ri ht Ri ht Ri ht 1/8" = 1'-01, Off = 1'-0" . �nL��' =�- =::=�,- -------- -_ _ - - - - � -L:�. - -- - - - - - -- - - --- -------_ - _ - - _ - --- --- =---- -:�Y=- _ 4�- I--- - _ - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -- -- - -- - - - - =r�- =_ ---- - - ---- -- -- - - - - - -- :_-' vvv . . . . - - - = vvv_ Y_v r" --- - -- -==s� - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- -- . - - - - - - - - - - - _. z - - _ _ - - - _ _ 1. w__._ T - r�. _ l r_ - .� _ --. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _� ��r _ -�- S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _j - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ fTi—__ - --� _ _ f - — _ _ _ - _ _-. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ 4i,R - - �c _ -ice _ =�J'—Tel - L _ _ _ �� -� •Y+` - �J`i 1 4j1 —�- 1" - w�- i _ , T- - v c1 _� — -j�� � N N 00 `� o � I - - - --C J ���—- -- 0 0 - - N N N N . HH1 ,/ " ���-11-1 i �- '4 H-f) �+� �+� -T-1 I / - - - - - -- I I i - 000 IT - - _ - Ell I� r-A�+ . - E0 - ' - _ ,IE � -� El - - _ ,,i - . [-j -, 'I - 11 \11 � � �_1-1-1- 1 I - 1,F]IRID � I I I - — - � \1' - . `- . - y I - No I � � IM�� - - I � I � 11IIIIIIIIIIIIIMMIIIIIIIII - — � - �l���������������������m � � � L L�ft L r-� 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" z m m - - . -F-� - - ----- -- - ' 0). � ^ems_ _ -Y_-'- - - - - _ __ _-- -_ - - ----___ - - •L- 7z ; - _ - _ D = ` =�''_ . - _ - .-- •--t om - - -- - - - - =r _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = O D rr _ - - ... - rt'.T-i - - �.1 - __ __ .! __i IJ ll- - �1 i - - zo -.- : - - -. . ---- --iL�� .::: I ft .. Ln --- - - N - - �` ---- - N — - - N ... *'' N Ln IT '...�.. ......................................... O _ O . - O _. N I , W" 1 r --N _ N ...... �.. ..................................... ... � _ 0I 00 0� � - � 0 m m IT n n -1 T -- -� 17 .\ -I 11, (Z-1) ;jH I — I = . 1 .. I � I . =1 ? � — � = �m . . :� � -------� --- - � . I zm I === === tf=== I r---� ,I ----� lu .. �. I I I - n, e- - ' � � I I .d I I L-...— . i . . - -- I --I I 1. I . 11-1�3 �11- .- ]- . - . *Ij �7:v[��'- - �77-�--��- �I I---I'-�-'I, � I I I j I I 1� 1-1 �1-1 -�-- I � 1� 1. . oj I r-t s Rear Rear Rear � US I, = 1'-01, 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/81, = 1'-01, m m I 00 0 N Proposed 10-Homes Tract For: Shareef Awad � G�5 . . Copley Dr. &Wilshire Dr. Rancho.Cucamon a CA 92739 * $ * . . . . . 2. . No.C 14504 . - - . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. ■ ° �� ■ 18=3317=1 �ti� . . . . IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . . ............ ... . . . . . . . .... . ...................... .... . ...................... ■ ■ ■ o . , - . . o � . .. . . . . .. . .. . . Plan . .m .................................................. ... . ... ...... ............. . .... ................... . . . . . . . . . . . .. �WIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� I I .rn . .. . .. . .. .................................................. . .................................................. ................... .................................................. ................... ............................ ................... .. ................ O .. .. .. .. • \. ......................................... ...... ' ................................................. ...... ' ................................................. ...... .. .................. ........... .. ................. ... ..... ........................ .......................................................... ........................ .......................................................... ........ ........................ ........................ ................................. ....... . . .Ext,, Elevations ... ... ................... O C 2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. H 58'-0" 20'-10" 16'-10" 2'-0" 16'-4" 2'-0" 01 58'-0" 20'-10" 17'-2" T-5 1/2" 12'-6 1/2" E:1 El Toilet 19 S California Room T-8" 13'-6" c'? 505 SF ol `n o 20'-10" 27'-2" 10'-0" of Master Bath 248 SF Master Balcony C�, 93 SF Nook '7rF1-1 192 SF FTC F7 � ❑ Make-up I I N 5'-0" o 0 II Master Closet 0 o II 116 SF II � Kitchen ° 386 S IF ° o �Fll ° 00 II II Master Bedroom Great Room o — — — — — — - — — _ 269 SF _ o ° 507 SF N 00 0 zo F_ - �I Laundry ® ® I N 105 SF q w in in � ■ --____-- ■ OVEN Refrigerator — — — — - — — — - I I 15'-10" 5-0" T-7" 21'-0 1/2" 0 W.I. Pantry I Butler's Pantry Dining Room 81 SF 1 77 SF 357 SF _ I I o I I F= Open to bIF' LO 350 SF Loft Dining Below iv 00 ❑ ❑ ------- _ 0 ------- ❑ Powder - Linen ❑ ' 36 SF 19 SF T-0" 8'-10" 5-0" 1 oo ® . . 0 ------ ----------------------------------------- II i I I II W.I.C. II Hallway 0 40 SF 140 SF II II Bedroom #4 -Bath #2 170 SF II II 47 SF Foyer 1 II II Linen 117 SF 1 _ F —N — — — — — — — — 1 Guest Bedroom o 8 s 131 SF iv W.I.0 #4 0 II 0 3 Car Garage Office 47 SF 824 SF 225 SF D LO II o Bedroom #2 0 1 193 SF It + Linen 1 11 SF DD `V Bath 4 00 0 Bedroom #3 00 63 SF - zo N ° 193 SF N 00 II Guest Bath II co H 53 SF 00 � Bath 3 W.I.C. op 55 SF II H 13'-2" T-0" 7'-0" ° 36 S F II -tee i N 01 oo DD r N CDD overed Entry q 233 S F I I I I - 13'-6" 8'-4" 16'-2" T-5 1/2" 12'-6 1/2" ti W2'-0" 58'-0" — — � - - - O I - O M N H N 23'-10" 23'-2" 13'-0" H cry 60'-0" i H Second Floor Plan First Floor Plan 1/4" = 1'-0" 114" = 1'-0" Proposed 10-Home Tract For: Area Schedule Shareef Awad Name Area Copley Dr. & Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 91739 * $ First Floor Area 2454 SIF Second Floor Area 2469 SFen.12-31-19 �� 9 Oct.. 2019 cP� No.C 141 1 Living Space 4922 SF ► ■� OF 18-3317-2 Balcony 105 SF California Room 558 SF ■ ■ Covered Entry 251 SF Garage 859 SF N Non-Conditioned Space 1772 SF Plan 2 0 � ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. loor Plans ............................. ............................. .............. .. M4 M3 M1 M2 ............................... .............. ............... ................. .... ................... ............ .......... ....... ................. .................. 0 � � ��� � I •_;>>' err, O r- .......................... .......................... .............. J� + Elevation Garage Door Elevation Light Elevation A Gable Vent Elevation A Tile Frame ........... ............................... ................ • : , .� .............................. .............................. ................. r. . -POP 00 l' -L i .1r 4 "A Spanish �.`t- I .. . . . . . . ... � . . . . . . ... . ! �, :} • Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information M1 MAIN STUCCO .... DUNN EDWARDS "PUEBLO WHITE"DET675 r " M2 FASCIA/TR1M DUNN EDWARDS ESPRESSO MACCHIATO"DIrT680 "c �+•� .� M3. . ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARDS "C.HERRY COLA"DEA158 . . I I � M4 ROOF TILE BORAL "BARCELONA"CASA GRANDE PROFILE ., ................................................... ................................... ............. � s d_ - .. .. .. i k`' •� mot, ..�, ^�. '`a•:i r..- K 'S'•.• ................................................ ..... . .................. ................................................ ..... . .................. ............................ ................. - fA- Elevation A Front Door ............ ................... Elevation "A " - Spanish Style �/4 rr = if—Off .. ...................... ...................... ............... M5 M3 M4 M5 M1 M7 M2 M6 L I . ............ .. .............. - .. .................. I ■ _ i l - - ..... ............ ..................... ...... ......... _ ................. ................... •= t �� � .I-_��.� •-� i f'-` - s -L.. � F-L 1-fr Y�.L .�r�.. W±+r �� - �.- '�_1�'_'�-.-^C'� �—� 1 �_:`^� �ry�-j�•�L � � - 'T-� _= f� i' I 1 i 1� I �• i i� i I I. �r I �t J�•II� I - a�` ;-fir �T:� i� '. -=may ? -:,T�� `-• ._ �a..� J 1� - _ - r__ .. - - - _:. � �._ i-— I �-iL_ �^ti__ -�,,.�1.�_..�s_7.. f-, T•--,-�r• •1�•-•-�--r•--=-•'T= ---r.��'L_ �-. i::.��--=--�--���--•�� —_� TT _ 3 Elevation B LiVht Elevation B Front Door Elevation B Outlooker Elevation B Shutters �-� .� r• I' s y If i LJ . � _ _ i l I .. ............................... .......................... � ................ ■ . - �E .� _..�F J>— -- - ` l ............................... .................................. _ -- - {{ ..................................... .................. r { ........... . . a66 ...... .... . .... ....... .............. ....... ............. Elevation 8 Deck Bailin levn B Gara e Door ......... ......... ......... ......... .. ......... ......... ......... ......... .. ................. . ......... ......... ........ ....... ......... ... ................................................. ................... ................................................. .............................. .................. Elevation "B " _ Craftsman Stile N ........ ................................ ........................ ................................. ........ ................................ .................................... .................. 114" = 1'-0" — N l � "B" Craftsman l Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information M1 MAIN STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS "FLINTSTONE"DE6221 . M2 HORIZONTAL SIDING DUNN EDWARDS "BROODING STORM"DET604 p M3 WALL SHILGLE SIDING DUNN EDWARDS "MISSION TRAIL"DE6223 H M4 FASCIA/TRIM DUNN EDWARDS "WHISPER"DEW340 M5 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR&SHUTTERS DUNN EDWARDS "MISSION.TRAIL"DE6223 M6 STONE VENEER.... BORAL "COUNTRY LED.GESTONE"ECHO RIDGE PROFILE ................. .. M7 ROOF TILES BORAL. "CHARCOAL BLEND"SLATE.900 r ....................................... .................. M1 M2 M3 M5 . M4 ; .... .................................................... . ...... ................. ................. . Elevatzon..0 Light Elevation C balcony ................. ................ f s � I �.I •/ � ^-�----�-^�� � -�f-.^ .• -_- _.. __ - ! PP OQ r •.�. 3. ..................... _ — - -- — --- �..�..,�.�.._.. ----- -- - ------ - � y �'•� ��kl r l ~``'� i .��__ .... ........ ............................................ ......... .. .................�. ... ................... .................. Proposed 10-Home Tract For: Elevation C Front Door Elevation C Garage Doo Sharee Awad r Co l Dr. & Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 91739 - Nil ; fit- �k No.C 14504 9 Oct.2019 I 7� ry rrC" - Italia uscan Ren.12-31-19 9 �o Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information 18-3317-2 1 .............. .... ............ .... M1 MAIN STUCCO DUNN EDWARDS "SAND DOLLAR"DE6171 f .......................... ...... ..... .. . ............................Plan ...2 . ... ...... ......... .. . .... ..................... r n " � } ,,����` ;'r��,�• '� '" � ,- _ c ,,.� �,., .� � _ M2 FASCIALITRIM.. ..DUNN EDWARDS GRANGE HALL DET695 M3 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARDS "MAYAN CHOCOLATE"DET693 .......................... ....... ...... ... .............. wV M4 STONE VENEER BORAL "PALISADES"ANCIENT VILLA PROFILE . M5. ROOF TILES......................................BORAL "GARNET BLEND"BARCELONA PROFILE ................. ................................. 0 Elevation "C " - Italian St le ................................................ ... . ................. rn 1/4" = 1'-011 O ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. Front E ... ............................................ ... ................... .................................................. ... ................... ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. ................................................. ... .................. .............................. .................. ............................................................ .......... ................................. .......................... ................................. .......... ................................. ............................................................ .......... ................................. .......................... ................................. .......... ................................. ....................................... ................... Elevation "A " - Spanish S Elevation "B " - Craftsman S Elevation " C " - Italian Style -\ I, , ';� __ _ - . - _-'� ��� / . .. ... I- - - . - --- - -� !n F. ft o - -....... ...... - - __ - -----.. . - _..�� -_' _ _ _. -�_ - _ err. __ __ _ _ _ -_ .. 1 ... �Tf I TI ��r-I--J_-� - - - - -:--- -- - - - �.-- __ _ _ _ 11 - -- -- - - - 4 - - -.-_ -- - - - _- - - ' - 7- -_--- - -- -_ - - ALL -L._. .I--L 1•-L - - -' - - - ----_: - ---__ - --_ - - - _ ----- - - - '- -' _ - - r _ - - .. . -. - ---- _- ---.- -.-_ --- _ _  - _ -__ _____ --:7 1n T L_.V - - - - - - --- -- -- - ---- - -- - - - - - - y'_ , ®® - �, - - - - - —: - - - -- - - - 1. -1 - li - z_-_ HH 1. � - �� I . I . 0 -L,U �� �� r "- L= 1 7F 2 EE 0� -`, �.-' - I - I EE L -7tim ::J =:= —ElsQ � L--------i - = %-. . - . - F7 . �]= - Fa - v 1r - T N ® __ N - - N - - v - • �__ ®® - .— _- - - - -_ - _ - -1 III 1IRM III 11 - - - f �- _ - - _ _ �} _ i� �' -- --- - .-c'r.-�'-' -_ C14M I� � � � -ray - _ �r -{ �� _ -,..�-�r�� M - - - - .�,-. - LL. _ - -- - - I _ �i .sue-.� I + l' LI L L J� I� i� - 1. T J r¢ LIL �" — IF = 1 —� � -- m e � - f - _ =- -_ _ _ 1! -- --r- -- - -i� _ _- -- -- _ - --- - ---- ---- - -. _ _ _ __� I. =i ��� 1 u-_--- _ r - __L — -- - - L. - Front Front Front 3/16" = V-0" 3/16" = 1'-011 3/16" = V-0" - - - -w-- Y - - -- -------- - - - - _% . . . . - -- - .. Y �r' _ _,_ � �_- - — - _ _ --: -- - ------- - - ----- - - - - — -- - - - s - _ - -=r=-—� — - - �—_ —mot—._ -- -- v _ �'� �.T -L Nor. ,- -��- - - _ _ _- _ _ _ �yr _ _- _-��i_.' �_ -_ _ - . - - -- — r. Tr= �1 J L �` - - = = ��� - - - - -- - - - - -..'__._-__ .- ___ - - 'mot- - T 11_. _.�~T� _ - _ _ _ - - - _ = ' .ry G r ® ® ® ® -LT,- ® n - r- - f - ! _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - -Fz� _ __ - __ --- - - -_- _ _ % 10 '�) - -- - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - --- -- -- --_ - - - _--- _- _ - - - - --. _.._. _ - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -ter ...r `�_v LLi`�� ��fl` _ _ Y'� -1 ---w�[,- �---_� _ ___ _ _fir",_1_ _ -� - =I_i__ _ _ _ __ _ .-. _ ..._ ... .. :. - - - _-_ -__ _ _- � _ --�Jam: -L, _.._- -.. _ _ _ _ - _ � '. N --- -- - - - - - - _ _ N N N - T� - - - - w -_ - M s�Y - - - �t�� -TSB..._- - - N = _ _ - _ _ - — - - -_ - - - -= J- - �- -- - �' - -_- -- __ - - -- U N - CM --- M �� :1 L ` - _7 - - 7 ::= . � .' -+ — IA I I .L�p-,I[11 L - — `-_- . �1 > - , t Right Right Right 1/8„ = 1'-01, 1/8" = if-0 If 1/81, = 1'-01, -m::: :� -- '�:::r � ; ; ; ;i 1 : I :::::: :: - �=-- . _ - _ a� -��- - _-- --= -. -- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ -w --� - -� v __ v v �� .�-- Ty - wr-�...--- �. r rr_� - - - - - - - - - y 1 L / / ® �i F . � H H� �H 1 1 - - ---- - _ - - - _ � -. J'I �-- . - Ci . N -_--'_ N ____- _- - N I _ = _ I . .4 � M - 1 J --- CO I� r IIF HH 4 �. .. / . - Li {--- 11- F M �- :1 / =1 =1 L - z \ ; ..-. \ I- f- \ ...... '.- -,--.- \ I- .- r-t �'2`.. - I � I .� I I 11 \\]I . 1� J I 01 I 11 . .- U.... w 11 I I I I' 0111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . 1� 1.111, Im 12--� - IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIE�7* ��������������������������������������m . IN �' ���������� m ' 17ti I + /\ [E IL IL \ 11 'T - - . - � \ I 1==zzzzz= I [-� .. . . . . .. . L L L . . . m ......... 1/811 = 1'-011 1/811 = 1'-011 ......... 1/811 = 1'-011 ......... . .......... . . . . . . . . . . a o� . r~ ..................... �- - - `- �� -_ - - _- - - ..................................................... - ---_ - . - = . - .................. 19 _ ��-: - - - - - - .. ................. ...... ................ *'' r- 1 - _ -I I - - - _--' _ -- — �- . w. �� f -- ----- - - - ..'�.) I ... ......................................................... 7 01 '-�� ..................................... ................... F1 ... . .1 mil c .1i1 _ � � IAAIII I I III. I: _ - --.�_ _ .: - Q = 11 - _ - '4 H - ' _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - i _ N N _ L 1 L _ _ -- _�-.�._ N - - --- -- --- -------- _ M -- - - - _---- - - _ - - 4� N - - r. _- _�' �� % 0 �0 r �— 0 �� 0 0 0 ,s � m - [zl �' Ell- - H . . M M .............. •'' °° IF � i __ `° rIIL--- I - I. � ill \1 - \1 . J . -I j -I -_ H . . — ......................................... �-- "I ��������������������������������������������������������������������������� m - � N' - - cc Rear Rear Rear 1/8 = 1 0" 1/8" = if-0 If 1/81, = 1'-01, .............. .............................................. Proposed 10-Home Tract For: Shareef Awad ° ✓ s . Co le Dr. & Wilshire Dr. Rancho.Cucamon a CA 91739 * $ * . . . . . No.C 14504 ... .. .. . Ren.12-31-19 tip. .. . ' . . . . . ....... . . . .. . . . " � 2 . . .... . ■ " . .. . . �. ... . .............................. .. . ... . .............................. ...... ...... ...... ..... ...... � • . . . . . . . . . . . . . lan 2 � . . . . . . . . .... .................... .................................................. ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . ........... --- - - - - - - - - - . ............... . . .. ..� . .. . .. .. .................................................. .. .................................................. ................... .. .................................................. ................... ............................ .. .. ................ .. .. ■ ► ■ ■ ■ ■ • 0 .. .. .. .. ...• ..�. ......................................... ..... ' ................................................ ..... ' ................................................ .. ................. ... ........................ .......................................................... ........................ .......................................................... ........ ........................ ........................ ................................. ....... . Ext. Eleva i o ns ... ... ................... O C 2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. H r_1 -7 -------- ------- ------------ ----- I I I I I I I 2'-0" 17'-0" 2'-0" E�] El 01 I I I I 8'-2" 30'-10" 21'-0" 01 / i I I I I I I oL------------------------- 80 ® I I California Room --------------------- -- ----- ----------- 488 SF I I 0 0 _ 00 ti Balcony � _ 210 SF 132 SF ❑ I I I I � I I I I I I I I I I 0 CV 8'-2" 30'-10" 21'-0" Open to L _ J Great Room Master Bedroom o M Below 397 SF 0 N O O O Great Room I 769 SFL — J I � I El - - - - - - - - - - - - - zo _L Kitchen rl 5'7" 3'9" 6'-6"" co 393 SF ' 6'-0" ' " 4'-51/2" 9'-31/2" 9'4' 5'-0" F- \ / -1 Wet BarED N ZN Linen C? \ ( OVEN - r J 0 D D ,' , 17 SIF / ,' Refrigerator Loft 1614 SF " ' 5'-7" 10'-3" Butler's Pantry 43 SF Powder BIDA q 19'-7" - ---_ 20'-10" -------- 3'-9" 15'-10" = Bath #6 = 32 SF ` - -------- -------- ® 54 SF --- -- _LO Pantry F_ ti P o 35 SF do - - LO _----- ------ - 41 - - o 3'-10" 4'-8" 5'-2" 3'-10" 2'-0" 11 11 0 o Master Bath o ' 239 SF ` u 0 M Laundry Toilet Ining M 105 SF Open to 15 SF Grand Foyer � Office Foyer Below 195 SF 552 SF 16'-8" 4'-4" 18-0" ~ 19'-0" L. J. D EA 5'-0" 15'-10" I - / II Master W.I.C. ® ® 140 SF DD 0 0 II F 00 Bath #3 -�---_ Bedroom #3 - II — — — — ' Guest at W.I.C. I I 54 SF �0 179 SF 4g sIF \/ 28 SF q LE)--II /\ -- v 10'-7" 6'-1" 3 , W.I.C. #2 �I II 32 SF Bath 2 L Covered Entry ki Bedroom #2 57 SF (01 86 SF , 173 SF v � C? ON Pn ifl II II 2-Car Garage o II II 474 SF W.I. 2 O v II 35 SF II Guest Bedroomzo . 223 SF I Cfl I i + T-0" 14'-0" 18'-0" 13-6" T-6" -a; 60'-0" + Z I 21'-0" 18'-0" 21'0" I 60'-0" I • I Second Floor Plan 1-Car Garage First Floor Plan 336 SF 0 114" = 1'-0„ 114" = 1'-011 I I I o� U Proposed 10-Home Tract For: Shareef Awad 5 Area Schedule Co le Dr. &Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 92739 - $ Name Area 11 Feb. 2021 U� No.C 14504 Ren.12-31-19 First Floor 3059 SF . � ■ � Second Floor 2353 SF r 18-3317 Conditioned Space 5413 SF ` cv� Blacony 147 SF `O California Room 540 SF Covered Entry 99 SF Plan 3 N Garage 922 SF H N Non-Conditioned Space 1708 SF ! ; ► ■ ■ ► ► ► ■ ■ # ■ , ■ ; O NFloor Plans N ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. T ......................................... ............................. 4 M2 M 1 _-�- �y M4 M3 of V ;T' �� •�� a` ' as _- 00 _ Elevation A Gara�-e Door Elevation A Light Elevation A Gable Vent Elevation A Tile. Frame ....................................... .. ........ .. . .......... ....................................... .. ...... ......... ..................... ................. ..-• j j .......................................................... " ...... ................. .......................................................... " ...... ................. .............................. ...................... - -r•� •�i r -K,:��'1•,'. ��:: _� ,•_ -- ... ................... . .. .. .................................................. ... ................... . .. ............................. ................ .. -t'\•,1�. S 7L7L I `;�A:~ ...... .. .................. ................................................. ...... .. .................. ............................. ................. !ter ......... ................................ ........................................................... ......... ................................ ..................................... .................. 00 00 ,r , • x ., - . . "A" Spanish Mark Designation Manufacturer. Color Information -� - ' M1 MAIN STUCCO COLOR DUNN EDWARDS' . "PUEBLO WHITE"DET675 M2 TRIM./.FASCIA DUNN EDWARDS "ESPRESSO MACCHIATO"DET680 -a ' ' - � M3. ENTRY&.GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARD "CHERRY COLA"DEA156 x .t I M4 ROOF TILES BORAL BARCEL'ONA CASA GRANDE'BLEND .................... ....... ............. ......... ..................................... . .. ......... ............... I i r • q. ................................................... ... .. ................. ... - r Elevation A on Door 4 ................................................. ................................................ . .................. ................................................ . .................. ..................... ...... ................. y! Y yy - r :�• ►� �Sr -.ice_ d - i-�R ........................................................... ......... ................................ ........................................................... ......... ................................ ..................................... .................. Elevation "A " - Spanish Style C 114If if-0 If M3 M4 M5 M2 M1 M7 M6 M5 ........... r - - !! ....... ................. r .............................. -401 ............... .............. ...... .................. Elevation B Garage Door Elevation B Light Elevation B Outlooker Elevation B Shutters . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... Ion ' _ ........... .. ......... .. . ............................. ......... .. . ............................. ..................... . . ...... ....... ....................... ... .... ......... . . .. ............................... ... .... ......... . . .. ...... .............. . S/a } •` •- �� \l%-� '�' 1 - — — .1 •.l' y�- /Y _ ... .............. .. ....... ..... ... ........................ l Craftsman .............................................. ............. ........................ .. ................ ... -,*, f ✓� — �� .E - ., Y - .. .. .......... .. .................. •� " ►. Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information I + ` ,' � - ,�, :-�. ,•�' I, M1 MAIL STUCCO COLOR DUNN EDWARDS "FLINTSTONE"DE6221 M2 HORIZONTAL SIDING DUNN EDWARDS "BROODING STORM"DET604 M3 WALL SHINGLES COLOR DUNN EDWARDS "MISSION TRAIL"DE6223 M4 FASCIA/TRIM DUNN EDWARDS "WHISPER"DEW340 ,'+a �• y fl �— - - y M5 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR&SHUTTERS DUNN EDWARD "MISSION TRAIL"DE6223 M6. .. STONE VENEER BORAL COUNTRY LEDGESTONE ECHO RIDGE PROFILE . s "CHARCOAL END"SLATE M7 ROOF TILES' BORAL. RCOAL BLEND" 900 -- i - Elevation B Front Door Elevation B Deck Bailin lam+ • T- �Y. 1 ... y !S —' ! - z. .1 ', - ....................................... ..... ...... ......... ....................................... ..... ...... ......... ..................... .................. ;�c' rr , �. ,; .................................................. ................... .................................................. ................ Elevation "B " - Craftsman Style •O C 114" = 1'-0" UO UO v �r��� .r��r� "C" - Italiari/'Tuscan Mark Designation Manufacturer Color Information ~ M2 M2 M5 M4 ..l�.i.. 7— M1. N1AI.N.STUC.CO COLOR DUNN.EDWARDS "SAND DOLAR" DE6171 rs.sawwwiw! "� ""i■'"""� �'�� M2 FASCIA/TRIM DUNN.EDWARDS "GRANGE HALL"DET695 ................. rri. w.w .+w.�.wlww•�ww.�• M3 ENTRY/GARAGE DOOR DUNN EDWARDS "MAYAN CHOCOLATE"DET693 � � � 1 , � � w�+r�►.I.Ira�wiwlr�rw�wrrw,�lw v a -•. wi,�'if= wiiie�^����, � M4. . ......S.TO.NE VENEER BORAL. "P'ALISADES".ANCIENT VILLA PROFILE ............. . ...... ....................... iwiwiwi^iwiwiwi+wiwsia wra�iwiwiw. w•r _ aI�III�lwi�l�Riwla0l��wlwlwi w ��•:.w: �i� � M5 ROOF TILES BORAL GARNET BLEND BARCELONA PROFILE 4 , WON .................. y . — _ wwi �^iw�aRiw ,ar ^ Aiwaia�iiwilrl�- - - t..• 1 .� iA1! li1aC: ,MI!!�=I�i 1 r iAl1� .Aw - il�i�!'✓Rl.: . .'ERR .. ^�� / �` iws �r�swwa�i�wwE .w mft-- wws ......... .................. = �' - i"'i ' Elevation C Gar a e Door Elevation C Li ht w.�w..�l..l..lw .. +�l.•l•�i•�•.l•�l::�rw. 4-4 �� I ■ ■ . . . . . . ... O - 4'� •' -�• s .-'• _ I -f.`-_ _ .r .__-.—_. _ —. _ .-_ - - - •�, .1 r - J' .. .. ... ...... ..................... Pr _ _-- _ •I 1 1�! — • - - - - - - r — -- - -- — ,< Proposed 10-Home Tract For: A p T �. � Sharee Awad SD � y Mr i • - I Co le Dr. £� Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 92739 cP No.C 14504 11 Feb. 2021 0 Ren.12-31-19 E Elevation C Front Door Elevation C balcon v -��-...,1• 18=3317 N ..... . .............................. ..... . ............................. ..................... O .. lan Elevation "C " -_ Italian Style .. NO1/4" = 1'-0" ............. ........................... ......... ............... N ................................................ .. ................. H ........ ..................... . . Front ... ... ................... N ©2018 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. .... . . ... . El .............. ........................ evation „A " - Spanish St le Elevation „B " - Cra tsman St le Elevation " C " - Italian St le .. .. . .... .... .................................. .... . .. ..... . ............................... ............................... ............. .................. . .. ........ ......................................... ............................... .................. . %11 - .. .. . . ................ ................... - _ _ ............. .............................................. _ -- % -- --------- % .. . % ............ % _.. % % . . % 11 . I... __ __ . .. ----- %, %lWit.,---------- 1. .. - �� - .._�::__ `��_ ---- _N . . . . - _____-_�.- - - __---- __---- __-----_ _� . . .. o a � U.---- _�_� 7 _ �_ - . . . . I---- __ __1zj . . - - . . . ; ___�_ - I . .. . r I .. . F 17 - .. . . .. . . . ... - � � m-_ � ❑ ....... 1 .... ....... . .. . . . ............ . . �_ 99 rE IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII rr ~ k ` B -1 M . _ - _ - I - — 7¢ I - .. .. . . . . .. F1 71 - . .. . . - 7 -- . _ N _ N _ . ... ...... .................. _ - O ............. _ - - - .. _ - .. M i 1 .. .... O - C3 c M I� _ r N O Fir O /7% f� N . N � 1 [ D _ �C � 19 N ❑ N N _ - `�� _ N N N N - N Li u -11 -' _ _ i . ....................................... .. - - — ....................................... -I . - - - ............................ ..... - v.i - - ..................... .............. .. �j� ........................ � ❑ ❑ N c I. - "II.,— $ 1- - i ............................... ...... .. _ .. fr±b co 71 r �:] j � i co coM _ � M . .... ............................................ . O .. ................................................ - ..................................... ..... .. ............................. ............... 95 ❑ ❑ ❑ ± — ;:: ...... ........................................ � II ............................................. � V ................................... .... .... FO ............................. ................. M___ I j I _1 _ m I 1, . J ............. .............................................. J ❑❑ 11 [�]I 1� --------�...................................................... . � L � . I- I- � .. I - - j LJLJLJ I LJLJLJ I"Ll"I"L-1 I I I . 111111 I - ,�� .— 11 I NI 11 N .. .................................... ................... F IRIH - � � -_ _�_�MIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIi� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM� IN 1% I I 1, 1, IV % - --], I IN IN I Front Front Front 1/8 it = 11-0" 1/8" = 1'-01I 1/8" = 1'-011 ---- �f� - - - - . .. I - 0 __'___� _�_���� :�_'� � �___=____,____ __��� I. ) I 'M I 1 cfl ;j = �IH� 1.1 LJ�- M NEl 19 9 @ m mb) y N.1 a N - _ _ M I1 ti r� . Y' N N 1 7 N N r` . � N ❑ III , . —1 - - - - mod � I -I � . . , _ �- 17J-_ — L __—, [ -1 - - . � I 0 - m -.---. � I 'I- Ri ht Right Right 1/8 it = 1'-0" 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8 it = 1'-0" -- -- —` - �- _ - - L I.1 �A_l . - -j � _____j Eg 17 co r` M A-,-, _ . _"I w . I @ . JHJ .. I I a] �m__ - 1� N - - N - - N M m - ti r� ti ti r� N � � � CV N N N N - - - — - 1. - - - - - --- - T 1 - — - - ---- -- - HH1 I H HH �fl I . __ I - I--- \_ I .� . �� _ . 1 . I I �__ I -_ . I . -�h— I - I — �=_ i -1 __ __ � __ - I j .. ,I"I, � -I I - I - —1 I :�] III __ 11 j 11 7 I � I -- I LL __L I -1 I 1 1 L I . A _____j P - - I I ----..i %;;mmmmmmmmm� tmmmmmmm�= L� L Off = 1'-0" 1/81, = 1'-01, Off = 1'-0" � - — - . . ... .. T--. . . . ........ V/ - - -------- . . . ........ - — �I -_ _ _.. - ----- - ---- - _ - - -a m .. .. .. . - ! 4 I . -0 . _ . - . .............................. - I - ..................... .Ur�� _ - ffl ❑ U � � - _ — �- - .. 1i1 I N _ _ - - _ ............................... _ — N - O . N i.. '� ^0p __ �/ N IT I S — W — N �I ;� .. N - — .. N ""' = - -_ m � - -N� M . .. Q) 7 41 U I .......................................................... .................................................... ..... � ..................................... ................... � I . . + I ;I_ + I m rti FT r r 1 T — IZL� L__ -1 H] �1 !1 tff;__71� J L'_ -I �_I� I I - — - ' LL-IL I I I ,, ..-j L_.' 1�7=' = I I 14) . . . . . . U . U � . . Rear Rear Rear . . . ti f = 1 - ... . ... . � _ - ... . ... . . . ' = 1 -0 ... . �8, , O,R �8, 1, �„ �8, . 11 ........... � . .. .. .. .. .. U . � ......... .. . .............................. . ...... ......... .. . .............................. .. . . ...... ......... .. . .............................. . ...... ......... .. . .............................. . ...... ......... .. . .............................. . ...... ......... .. . .............................. . ...... ..................... . . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .......................... .............. Vj .. .. I- . . . . . . . _ 0�............................................... ——. U CU.. -+-� O.. . �, . . . Dinin .. 0 v . . . 255 SF U . a � � - rff �Izi � Office ' '� I I I Grand Foyer 11 I I ❑ ❑ 71 z . . 552 SF . " . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . . .. . . . .. . . II � .. . .. . .. . . . . . ... SI . ..... .. .. .. .. .. .... ...... M... . W.I.C. . . ;r, - - � . . . . . . . . ... . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . .. I E . . . . . I I . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . . . . . . ... . Guest Bath sF .. . .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. .. . .. ............ . . . . . . . . .. o _ .. . ....... ....... ....... ....... w Covered Entry . .. .. .. .. .. .. ........... ........ .. ........... ........... ............ ❑ . . _ . . Guest Bedroom N .. . . .......................................... . . . ................................................. . . . ................................................. . ................ ................................................ ................. ................................................ ........................... ................ 3-Car Garage .. U . ....... ....... ❑ ....... I ........... .............................................. ........................ .......................................................... ........................ .......................................................... ....... ... .................. ........................... .... .................. `° Proposed 10-Home Tract For: L M - . ­. III: � + j Shareef Awad � G�° Dh M ✓ ti s . . . . . . . . � r Co le Dr. &Wilshire Dr. Rancho Cucamon a CA 92739 * $. N 1'-0�. cP� No.C 14504 . . . = 2 = ao Ren 1 31 17 e � ti . N 18 3317 �� �����. - . ..... . . 1 - - - ■ ■ . . .. . . .. .C" . . .. . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. ..A .................................................. ... ... ...... ............. . ................... ................................... ... .. ...... ............. . . ....................................................... ... ... ...... .................................................... .. ...... ............. . . .......... ................................. ... ... ...... ............. .................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .__ an 3 . . ...................... ................. . .... . ..� . . . . . . . . ►► ►► _ .. N. First Floor Plan (Elevation Side Gara -e�.... ■ . . O ■ ■ � ■ • N �8 1...0. H.. ... .......................................... .......... ................................. .............................. Eleva.tlo ", ,s ................... N ❑2017 DOUG ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT EXPRESSLY RESERVES HIS COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT AND OTHER PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THESE PLANS. THESE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE REPRODUCED, CHANGED OR COPIED IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER, NOR ARE THEY TO BE ASSIGNED TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT FIRST OBTAINING THE EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION AND CONSENT OF DOUGLAS ANDRESEN, ARCHITECT. TRACT 19917 PRECISE GRADING PLANS GRADING GENERAL NOTES NO , A, GRADING PROCESS APN : 0226-1 D2-30 1. A GRADING PERMIT SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY AND THE GRADING INSPECTOR SHALL BE NOTIFIED 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY GRADING. GENERAL NOTES 2, CLEARING AND GRUBBING, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE, FOOTINGS, FOUNDATIONS, RUBBLE, B. RELATED REQUIREMENTS: TREES AND ROOT SYSTEMS, OTHER VEGETATION, DEBRIS, ETC„ SHALL BE COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE 1. THE CITY ONLY APPROVES THE ENGINEERING DESIGN IN SCOPE AND NOT IN DETAIL ON THESE PLANS. THE ! BANYAN STREET GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS. CITY DOES NOT VERIFY CONSTRUCTION QUANTITIES ON THESE PLANS. APPROVAL OF THE PLANS ARE FOR PERMIT LOT-34 _� - 0 o MB 334a4- 3. EXCAVATION SHALL THEN BE COMPLETED AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT PREVENT THE CITY FORM REQUIRING CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN THE PLANS WHERE APN; G225-032-17 ' LOT D �� �� 4, IF EXPORTING 50 CUBIC YARDS OR MORE OF SOIL, THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE THE LOCATION WHERE THE MB 33 2 w w� z SUDH ERRORS ARE SUBSEQUENTLY FOUND TO BE IN VIOLATION OF ANY LAW, ORDINANCE, HEALTH, SAFETY, OR OTHER APN:�522-07 Q c EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTATION a FOUND MAC NAIL LOCATED AT THE SOIL IS TO BE DEPOSITED ALONG WITH A LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE FORM THE PROPERTY OWNER PRIOR TO GRADING n a� ___I o GYPSUM X DEIGN ISSUES, CITY ACCEPTANCE OF PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER FROM RESPONSIBILITIES FROM G � PLAN APPROVAL. IF THE SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A STOCKPILE PLAN AND THE CORRECTION OF ERRORS AND OMISSIONS DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, ---L-- -- OR y INTERSECTION OF CENTERLINES OF PERMIT ARE REQUIRED. 2. .. _j ILSRHIRE U SANDTON PLACE AND WILSHIRE DRIVE ALL CONCRETE (PCC} WATER CARRYING DEVICES WITH SLOPES LESS THAN 0.5% SHALL BE WATER TESTED PRIOR D 5, THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL THEN BE INSPECTED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, ADDITIONAL OVER _j m W o TO FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE. ANY RESIDUAL PONOING IN EVIDENCE AT TIME OF INSPECTION SHALL LOT 22 W J ¢ z P190JEC"T EXCAVATION SHALL BE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER'S RECOMMENDATION AND ¢ BE CAUSE FOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT, APN: 0 MB 339�93-100 m � SIR 25-062-OA, DEBRIS, MUD, SILT, ETC. SHALL NOT BE DEPOSITED ON PUBLIC OR OTHER PROPERTY AT ANY TIME DURING CHICKASAW ROAD COPLEY DRIVE AS CONTAINED IN THE SOILS REPORT. 3 6. THE EXPOSED SOILS SHALL THEN BE SCARIFIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12 INCHES, BROUGHT TO PROPER EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTATION CONSTRUCTION. ANY SUCH DEPOSITION SHALL BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY BY THE CONTRACTOR. ACCESS ROAD FOUND MAG NAIL LOCATED AT THE MOISTURE CONTENT AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% OF THE MAXIMUM DENSITY, AS DETERMINED BY 4. ALL DRAINAGE PROTECTIVE DEVICES SUCH A5 SWALES, INTERCEPTOR DITCHES, PIPES, PROTECTIVE BERMS, LOT 21 2 g FFEEWAY 21D INTERSECTION OF CENTERLINES OF APPENDIX SECTION J107,5 OF THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. EQUIVALENT COMPACTION CAN BE BARRIER WALLS, CONCRETE CHANNELS, OR OTHER MEASURES DESIGNED TO PROTECT ADJACENT BUILDINGS OR M6 339�93-100 t COPLEY DRIVE AND SANDTON OBTAINED BY METHODS SPECIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, APN' 0 25-062-03 N VICINITY W PLACE PROPERTY FORM STORM RUNOFF MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. N. .S, 7. PRIOR TO IMPORTING SOIL, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER NOT LESS 5, THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR GRADING AND INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH (D EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENT 70 THAN 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE, SO THAT EACH PROPOSED IMPORT SOURCE CAN BE SAMPLED, TESTED, AND APPENDIX SECTION J 105 OF THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, BE PROTECTED IN PLACE APPROVED PRIOR TO DELIVERY FOR USE ON THE SITE. 6, EQUESTRIAN TRIALS SHALL BE SURFACED WITH A 4--INCH THICK SECTION COMPOSED OF 95% DECOMPOSED -WILSHIRE-DR - WILSHIRE.- - 8, PROPER COMPACTION FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT INCLUDING THE BACKFILL OF UTILITY TRENCHES, ETC. SHALL BE GRANITE (1/8" TO 3/8" DIAMETER) AND 5% COARSE SAND COMPACTED TO 90%. A COMPACTION REPORT g v VERIFIED BY THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. HE SHALL PREPARE A COMPACTION REPORT, WHICH SHALL BE "o CERTIFICATES: CERTIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PROJECT FINAL oK 1, In reference to NPDES requirements, the undersigned certifies one of the following: SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. /N: O 0 APPROVAL, 3-100 mac, u A Notice on Intent (NOI)is not required of this development. 9. PAD CERTIFICATION FOR ELEVATION OF ALL PADS WITHIN THE PROJECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING 5-062-0 4 �7. FLOODWATER CONVEYANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE WORK SHALL BEom ❑ A NQI has been filed and the WDID number is 8 36C385925 INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ANY CONCRETE POURING. PAD CERTIFICATION CAN BE BY EITHER ONE APPROVED BLACK-LINE-AS-BUILT PHASED SO THAT NEWLY CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES ARE FULLY OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO EXISTING FACILITIES BEING EXISTING STREET PLANS SHAREEF AWAD 1t L GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN OR IN LETTER FORMAT SHOWING THE DESIGN AND AS-BUILT PAD REMOVED. PER DWG. NO. 2356 ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN. EITHER SHALL BE SEALED BY A CIVIL EXISTING S,D. PLANS LOT 19 Print Name Signatur Date 8. A GRADING PLAN (CITY APPROVED) SHALL BE ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. DEVIATIONS FORM THE PLAN SHALL PERDING N0 2356--D MB 339�93�-100 � ENGINEER LICENSED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. .`�� APN: 0 25-062-01 OWNER DEVELOPER BE PRECEDED BY AN APPROVED PLAN REVISION. UPON REQUEST OF THE BUILDING INSPECTOR, THE REQUIREDTRACT NO. i8122 � ! - � TitielGapacity [Engineer, Developer, General Contractor etc.} 10. CERTIFICATES OF FINAL LOT GRADING ARE TO BE SUBMITTED THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRIOR PLAN AND REVISIONS SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE, FOR REVIEW. ,w TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION, p P P SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE � ' 2. The undersigned Civil Engineer will be responsible for professional inspectio accordance with Appendix J1O5 of the 9. PROTECTION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, DURING GRADING OPERATIONS, THE ERMITTEE N BLE current adopted California BuildingCode. 11. FINAL APPROVAL INCLUDES THE CONSTRUCTION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLAN, i MB 339/93-100 g FOR THE PREVENTION OF DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTY AND NO PERSON SHALL EXCAVATE oN LAND APN: 0'25-085--10 ` ; � ANGEL CESAR 12/09/2020 INCLUDING DRAINAGE FACILITIES, DRAINAGE PATTERNS, WALLS, CURBS, ASPHALT PAVEMENT, BUILDINGS, ETC, ALL SUFFICIENTLY CLOSE TO THE PROPERTY LINE TO ENDANGER ANY ADJOINING PUBLIC STREET, A SIDEWALK, ALLEY, OR ITEMS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE LINE AND GRADE SHOWN ON THE APPROVED PLANS. U Print Name Signatur Date OTHER PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT SUPPORTING AND PROTECTING SUCH PROPERTY FROM SETTLING, \ 12, AN AS-GRADED GRADING PLAN AND CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEERING CRACKING OR OTHER DAMAGE WHICH MIGHT RESULT. LOT 17 7 Registration Number 87222 SERVICES DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RELEASE OF GRADING BOND AND PRIOR TO FINAL GRADING INSPECTION. THE MB 339 93-100 10. IMPROVEMENTS DAMAGED BY THE GRADING OPERATION LOCATED ON ADJACENT PROPERTY OR WITH PUBLIC EXISTING S.D. PLANS APN; 0 25-085-09 PERMITTEE SHALL PROVIDE A COPY OF AS-BUILT PLANS TO THE CITY FOR A PERMANENT RECORD AT THE END OF RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACED, AS NOTED BY CITY INSPECTORS PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE PER DWG, NO, 2356-D 3. 1 hereby certify that I have reviewed this plan and that it substantially conforms to 4�' ��14-to'4r THE APPROVED GRADING WORK. (TRACT NO. 18122} OF THE WORK. Soils Report No, e p I g 3��1 Dated �� �� �Q�S �� c �34f 7 13. A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (C OF O) AND /OR FINAL ELECTRICAL CLEARANCE FOR ANY BUILDING WILL NOT BE jC0PL±1r7=Y0FR!1[VVEE_ DRIVE- Cf� 11. OBSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED BEFORE BEGINNING Prepared byCp��Ya�'DMo�a�„ �. # EXP.�V21 RELEASED UNTIL ALL GRADING, DRAINAGE WQMP (WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN) BEST MANAGEMENT CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. - ��- PRACTICES) IMPROVEMENTS ARE COMPLETED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE ENGINEER'S AS-BUILT 12, ALL WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRES SEPARATE INSPECTIONS AND PERMITS ISSUED BY THE `J �� 2dZ1 rTr'r£- CERTIFICATE MUST BE WET SIGNED AND SEALED ON THE WOMP BMP EXHIBIT. THREE SETS OF EXHIBITS CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Signature of Professional Soils Engineer or Geologist Date +>7F CIIL��� Wet Seal MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE, FOR REVIEW, THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 13. SHORING PLANS AND CALCULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IF FOUND NECESSARY, 4. Existing Survey Monument Preservation: WILL SUBMIT ONE ORIGINAL TO THE STATE WATER BOARD AND WILL SUBMIT A SECOND SET TO THE WEST VALLEY 14. ALL SLOPES EXCEEDING 5' IN HEIGHT AND 5:1 OR STEEPER SHALL BE PLANTED WITH APPROVED PLANT LOT 16 s~'i 1 hereby certify that I have identified all Survey Monuments of Record that could be disturbed by this project. All said MB 339 93-100 monuments which currently exist shall be protected in place or replaced in accordance with Section 8771 of the MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT, MATERIAL AND PROVIDED WITH APPROVED WATERING SYSTEM. APN: 0225-085-08 8 ; ,' C � ni Business 'Professions. C e. LEGAL DESCRIPTION 15, SHOULD ANY UNFORESEEN SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES BE ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THEY SHALL �- � Q S[IR�,�A- ALL THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST ONE OF THE SOUTHWEST _ -- - - _ I gat y ' Date +� 2 8�'•��A. BE IMMEDIATELY BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER OF RECORD, THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, Si nature df-�Fa essional a Surveyor G' g ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, AS CONVEYED TO AND ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT BEFORE PROCEEDING FURTHER. 0 72x3 eal THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO A GRANT DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995, AS DOCUMENT NO, _ t_ >No• 19950352692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 16• UTILITY LINES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED) WITHIN THE WORK AREA SHALL BE LOCATED AND THE DEPTHS -- - ACCESS_ ROAD 5. _As-built Cedificate: EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE; BEGINNING AT A CONFIRMED BY THE CONTRACTOR. IF THE IMPROVEMENTS CANNOT BE CONSTRUCTED PER PLAN BECAUSE OF f f I hereby Certify that the "Record Drawing" Measurements as shown POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, DISTANT NORTH 0-00 58 WEST, 60.02 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST E cP CORNER OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE STATE CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO A GRANT DEED CONFLICTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DISCUSS MODIFICATIONS WITH THE CITY INSPECTOR TO DETERMINE IF A PLAN INDEX MAP hereon were made under my supervision or as noted and are correct to OF RECORDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1974 IN BOOK 8522, PAGE 54 ET SEQ, OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE NORTH REVISION OR A FIELD CHANGE IS REQUIRED. the best of my knowledge and belief. 88'44'28" EAST 331.15 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST 17. ALL WALLS (RETAINING AND GARDEN) OVER 3 FEET IN FINISH HEIGHT REQUIRE SEPARATE PLANS SUBMITTAL AND SCALE; 1"=100' ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER, DISTANT NORTH 0'00'44" WEST 60.14 FEET FROM THE Engineer Date NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL. Signature of Professional Civil En DESIGN, REVIEW, PERMITS, AND INSPECTION. 9 9 18. ALL WORK SHOWN HEREON SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Wet Seal LEGEND OF ABBREVIATIONS STANDARDS AND APPENDIX J AND CHAPTERS 18 AND 23 OF THE LATEST CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE. ADD TI Vn N A L GRADING NOTE CB CATCH BASIN LP LOW POINT 19. GRADING INSPECTIONS: ALL WALLS OVER 3-FEET HIGH (MEASURED CONSTRUCTION DATE 1. WOMP BMP As-Built Certificate CF CURB FACE MH MANHOLE PCC PAVEMENT PER PAVING PLAN FROM LOWER GROUND SURFACE TO TOP OF I hereby certify that the necessary water quality management plan storm water structural treatment (Best Management DJR- DUCTILE IRON PIPE NRWL NON-RECYCLED WATER LINE 01 PRIOR TO THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS, THE OWNER AND GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL WALL) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER A ESTIMATED START DATE, DEC. 2020 Practice) devices have been constructed under my supervision and are functional to the best of my knowledge as of the E ELECTRIC RWA RECYCLED WATER REQUEST A PRE-GRADING MEETING. THE MEETING SHALL BE ATTENDED BY THE PROJECT ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: DEC. 2021 dace below. FF FINISH FLOOR SD STORM DRAIN SEPARATE PERMIT. FG FINISH GRADE SW SEWER 4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK OWNER/REPRESENTATIVE, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR AND THE BUILDING INSPECTOR TO DISCUSS FL FLOW LINE T TELEPHONE - FS FINISH SURFACE TC TOP OF CURB (100) --- l r EXISTING CONTOURS ABDUT GRADING REQUIREMENTS AND PREVENTIVE MEASURES, ETC. IF A PRE-GRADING UTILITIES Signature Date FWA FIRE WATER TG TOP OF GRATE � 100 PROP. CONTOUR MEETING IS NOT HELD WITHIN 24 HOURS FROM THE START OF GRADING OPERATIONS, THE GRADING Wet Seal GAS GAS VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE ELECTRICITY: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY BENCHMARK GB GRADE BREAK W WATER PERMIT MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUSPENSION BY THE BUILDING INSPECTOR; The above certificate shall be placed on the first sheet of the Water Quality Management Plan Site and Drainage Plan. HP HIGH POINT WM WATER METER PHONE: 1-800-655-4555 SET 2.5" BRASS DISK NORTHWEST INV INVERT WV WATER VALVE b. THE GRADING CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL INTO THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BUILDING AND WATER AND SEWER: CUCAMONGA COUNTY WATER DISTRICT CORNER OF NORTHERLY CATCH PROPERTY LINE/ _ _ SAFETY DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 1 WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE TO REQUEST THE FOLLOWING PHONE: BASIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER WDID #8 36C385925 RIGHT OF WAY GRADING INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO CONTINUING GRADING OPERATIONS: TELEPHONE: GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY (VERIZON) OF EAST AVENUE & BANYAN 35+ APPLICANDOWNERIDEVELOPER PGR2018-00054 PHONE: 1-800-422-4132 NORTH OF THE BCR ON THE WEST SUBTT19917 CENTER LINE - THE BOTTOM OF THE OVER-EXCAVATION GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY SIDE OF EAST AVENUE STAMPED SHAREFF AVIAD FENCE LINE x x x Ii. COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE BUILDING PERMIT; PHONE: 1-800-427-2200 "RANCHO CUCAMONGA BENCHMARK DIAR, LLC, iii, AT THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING, THE GRADING CONTRACTOR OR OWNER SHALL REFUSE: WASTE MANAGEMENT OF THE INLAND EMPIRE 1231 N, CACTUS AVENUE, STE. D SETBACK 1OO89A, RIALTO, CA. 92376 SUBMIT TO THE PERMIT TECHNICIANS (ENGINEERING SERVICES FRONT COUNTER) AN PHONE: GRADE BREAKS CABLE TV: ADELPHIA COMMUNICATION EL.EVA11ON - 151D427 Fr (909) 519--1355 FIELD TOPO LINES ORIGINAL AND A COPY OF THE PAD CERTIFICATIONS TO BE PREPARED BY AND PROPERLY PHONE: 909 481-1115 WET SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND SOILS ENGINEER OF RECORD; SCHOOL: CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT CIVIL ENGINEER iv. THE ROUGH GRADING CERTIFICATES AND THE COMPACTION REPORTS WILL BE REVIEWED PHONE: 909 987-8942 DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES INC. Y BY THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND APPROVED PRIOR TO THE 4141 E. INLAND EMPIRE BLVD, SUITE 250 DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE U C-'i ? ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, ONTARIO CA_IFORNIA 91764 20. PRE-WATERING OF THE PROJECT/CONSTRUCTION SITE SHEET INDEX CONTACT: ANGEL CESAR, P.E. CITY OF RANCHO C U CAM O N a) THE PRE-WATERING ACTIVITIES SHALL NOT OCCUR WITHIN 24-HOURS AFTER A RAINY DAY; SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION SUB-CONSU.`-TANT FROM BLUE ENGINEERING b) THE PRE-WATERING ACTIVITIES SHALL BE DONE DURING THE DAY TIME AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MONITOR THE 1 TITLE SHEET AND CONSULTING, INC PRECISE GRADING PLANS R W WATERING AND CORRECT OVER-WATERING SITUATIONS; 2 PRECISE GRADING PLAN PHONE: (909) 248-6557 TRACT NO. 19917 3 SECTION SHEET 60' SETBACK 60' SETBACK a} CONTRACTORS SHALL IDENTIFY AND USE THE RECLAIMED OR RECYCLED WATER SOURCES, IF IT IS AVAILABLE, FOR 4 DETAILS AND SECTIONS SHEET WATERING ACTIVITIES. 5 PRIVATE STORM DRAIN & HORSE CORRAL TITLE SHEET 21 PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE STRUCTURAL STORM WATER TREATMENT INFILTRATION LOCATION PLAN DEVICES 6 WOMP SITE PLAN 7 EROSION CONTROL PLAN TYPICAL BUILDING (COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS BMR'S), THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY TO BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION DEVICE TO A EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 8 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS SETBACK DETAIL U MINIMUM OF 12-INCHES IN DEPTH. 9 CUT AND FILL MAP DESIGN REcaMMENi ACREAGE OF SITE o m TOTAL LAND AREA DISTURBED: 7.17 ACRES. 10 TTM 19917 CONCEPTUAL GRADING �-`�� �`�� cFs 4� ALI DAVID EVANS VF RAW CUT VOLUME: 7,619 CY DRAINAGE PLAN REFERENCE ONLY r" ANoASSOCIATES INC. GROSS 312,180 {7.i7 ACC RAW FILL VOLUME: 15,234 CY } a Na.a7222 DRAWN 4141 E, Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 SHEET 11-13 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NET 252,465 (5.80 AC) NET FILL VOLUME: 7,616 CY Ontario Ca nia 91 DISTURBED AREA 312,180 (7.17 ACC SHRINK FACTOR 1O%: 762 CY 14-15 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL ��� ctv�� ��Q Know what's below. IMPERVIOUS AREA 127,480 (2.93) 17 MITIGATION MEASURES rF a� GA'~i'ro�- CHECKED R.C.E. No 87222 ow,wlNc N Call efibeforeyoudig. IMPORT VOLUME: 8,378 CY AC DATE FILE NO � I r I r I I l I 1 IJ \ II IIIIIIIII I II II I IIII I \ / A I � �,TRACT NO. 18122 p / « III LOT 16 APN: 0225-085-08 STING 24 TORMDRAIN _ v - -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _PER_�T DRAIN�LARIS- = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --_- - _ _ - _- - - - - - - - - - - - - _- - - = - Ji I \ - - - - _ I i / II III I �� I IIII )\� -D1�. 10- 56 D =-_-__ ___ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ - - _ - -- _ _- - -_- - - -ESTIAIG_�TS�E�-PLANS- / �� A \ IIIIII oo �� I I EXISTING STREET PLANS III V A --_- _ _ _- _ _ _ _- __ -__�� - - - -_ - _ _ _ _ - - rZR-STREET�LA�I���' I I I \ TRACT N0. 1�122 \ III L' oti 2 PER STREET PLANS I 1 , _ - �c LET 7 - - - - _ _ - _ _ _-- __ =T N9 = - - - _ - - - - - WG. W 2356 �� / I I I o`' I I �8� II \ _ _ _ - _ _ =LCT18 - = - - - __ -_- _ _ ti =_ - t0 26- ��� 50 13 l L�� 21 LOT22 S TRACT BOUNDARY 1 DWG. No. 2356 NcJ) \ _ \ 13 aPPP�I: 0225-085-09TRACT BOUNDARY APN: 0225=085-10 � aPN: a225�e6�or - � 11 APN: 0225-062-02 � �� �� APN: 0225-062-03 TRACT BOUNDARY 13 \ �� ti SO' 00' 59.55"E 13 �o _ \ APN: 0225-062-04 \ Z _- __ -214.9'-__ - _ - _ - - - - - ' -- �F 95.0' \ 91.9' °91.5' 95.0' /o° l / ��� �ti�� 236.4' v % ���� o o 7> - ti8.4 8 �•rF F - _ - N - - FLI 8 go L o - _ _ _ c�� F.G. \ �� �� s o w- - o/ !7--4.8% -1.0� 0 �v I 8.9 -3.1A �L _ i 3.1� -3.1% 'o / 21.2 �2.9% I\ 78.4 ° i - --- L \� G 9.0 9Q -1.0% F� -0.9 0 ��� 8.6 FL j ��' 9 -- 9 clw --- ' N 3 \ FI t FL ��� FL cli ,�� I o \ �\ / 10 414.19 TF / 10 // \ / /� 10 I �o� : / 6 =r-FL I �b F o ° - N , FL / �� ` \/ I 420.36 TW \% �\/ �\ cn / �o o j �, - -� - 7 1 .8 9.1 ;! !! ! 6 ��9 o \ \I /\ ' r\ � /\ \ 6p' / o N I / e � ' e �. r I 23.3 III III o 1 \ _ o I L/ I o 1 16 _ 1 F.G. o I FL 13.9' 3 °' A �/ 16 - 16 I 16 v I - I I o l � I; I; II � � � I � _� 7 _� `� I � � 21.0 � 98.12' I 114 I I �. V 1� � F.G. _ _ 16 � _ - 18 8.0 G.B� I G.B. G.B. / G.B. e 7 Y iT of \ '� Cam. L / - v F.G. .�� ��� / ~ fig' ��' ��5�� � 2 1� 4.21 I 120' TRAIL J - ► I � --- - _ I I I I I � FF=23.87 � o 16 1 \ I RIDGE-- -- �, - -RIDGE o - �o RIDGE 1cn 4 III I I \ \HP 9 S ° 30' L �'I I c� o ` � °�c� 00 N 1 I !i20.8.-1 ° - T I PAD=23.2 FF= 10.67 N sl h� n o / 1 8yI Ig 15 F� PAD = 10.0 I `� N m1�� 1 �LL > I o I 20.62 - J 44.29'1 (PAD�420.2) 1 22.7 HP I \ I ! \ - J 1 > I I T r` A F.G. l FL00 (RA-B=407.3) \ Q \ o �1 N e I N I I I -5.0� 1 I J 5.00' I � TC / _ 11 22,5 10 j I 7 m u 2 - ]% 5 ��> / �� I ' co `� 3 �� 3 �J �o ����° �� 1.3 / / o o J o° 5 . ✓ 2 DF / DEDICATION 4 1412 0 �� / m l 0.5 / o cDI / ! c� / C� I i �1� I DD / 0 1 �� ` \ 1 e cc 20.4 1 �' �" -FL 24.2 GIVI 9 � I/ ! / a' r e -� ° 6. � I I 3 I I � � J o F.G. - TG 22.3 �! 212.39' \ 0 1 / 5 ` 20.7 / 20.4 00 45. 7E FL �1' 8 D I \ C �. s 3 v � N 0 23.6 N z 9.9 -�0�\ F.G. / r� F.G. o Au�/ 20.5 5 l � �o ° °TWI I 73 o N N J 7 J -1.0 ° I 1 / IIII .I �j F.G. / 5�l �' l �� �� Q I e /20.3 „ „ „ � � � I � I rn O I 405.63 TF N / I 18.4 N ��D \ _ O f 4 - e I III �, J ( 15.6' �5. Gg r 1 �- v 6 0 ! F.G. F.G. I . o - - O 14.0 1 FL / F \ o GFF=22. / N o oI o� ;n o \ Q �'' 0.11 � 5 -5.0% _ I d N d N1712.05" � I r �� �, �, �, � e I 10 / o .1 i� / ow FF= 11.27 �1' .��I N DF� FL I / e \ v / .! I � �-�� � �� � �. 13.52' J / �' / r 30 � I � \ ��. o v / I I- 0 I� II o� PAD= 10.6 � � �o's I' 1.4' 0.5' �� / ° I / O��9 0 / B=93 ° O i I C I I I > I a I / / N / / I F \ \ D (PAD=408.61) o o 0111. � / 0.1' g j 11' 1 S 2 Z I I �I 2 I y A - TG \ / / DF / 22 ,ti 16 43 lg TF ° 6 A 1 i = - _ -5.07 4 �. J N 11.8 �s r 1 1 FF=23.57 F 3S 116 1 1 � / o HP FL B I / / rn /� -8:g� 22 Hp 1 t- -Tw 11 � 7 12. l B 4 ; III I ,, 1 PAD-22.9 - � (1428) �\ 7 cf' 0 m / I , 00o / o o / I 30' / I / K K � cf) GFF= 10.6 t / /1.1' FF= 15.67 ��l <A o C If`> 20.0 V(PAD 4119.9)� `� � I � / � I I F_ -7B.S.L. I o e - FF- 12.77 / DF PAD- 15.0 FF= 17.27 1 /0 0 e F.G. 1.21 0.8 o \ E I�� l ��0 1 I o I PAD= 16.6 / I ? II L- K I II i 1 ,\o. L PAD= 12.1 I ° f �; DF I m FF=20.67 4 10.0 �I �I ) L L (PAD=4120) I I o PAD=20.0 I e III II II r vc� 1 22.7 d III > \ - 5 (F' D 409.1 / N I' I! III o � 1 - � I FL I - 1 1 00 / - .3% 11.3 9 T� 1 - - I \. / I _l / 1 1 l (f AD=417.1) F.G. :: 0 ° c o I � � / � 1 � °' � _ _ _- J �� � / F.G. 1.9� � / g G 13.9 15.0 GB^I 15.9 L� 1 f I 19.6 1�TG -2.8 / - � -1.2� ' II ��' _ G V - 1 0 S 0° 1' 0 "E / F� I / 6 l FL TG 17.4 I ° ° ° \ >I I FL 9 / I _ SO° 00' - � - . ° - 1.6' �, 2 I co l 0 209.89 209.9 o �; / 2 1.7' S 19.6 ! � FL 11.7 DF = GFF= 15.0 I GFF= 16.5 y S N F G. III \ HP �� y DF gS \ ! FL o 4 FL / 5 A / o� 23.1 ti I FF= 0. F 20.7 9 ; o `ti 10 2 7 d � \ FF= 11. / F.G. I I I N 0 N 12.4 / / r ' \ / i = I j 16.4 ( c N N GBQ9 InHP 17.2 ° - ---- -- -- O FL_ ----- FL- GB 2 " �� e 1g \ _ N ------ ------� --- .s GFF=21.8 \ w � - \ ��" � ~ _----__ __ ' v ------�- - -- o L cv o ---------------- - \ ° -- ----- I 30 B.S.L. 2 ---- r m 1 m - 4 c� 1 ---- y o, 6' �� 6 -� o 30' I I I 12.7 r-� 4 - �L f �^ 3.15'i 1 l 6 `� G-- ��,� H �I_ L� 1 B.S.L. 1® CO 6 1 > 6 �� ----- ------- 1 �� 16' --- - - -- _ 72.8' 16' - / U I� I .& / I _ J / I I I I I 71.4' 91.9' I I 5 91.5' . .�1. / I �� F J FF= 11.67 J / / e 5 - e - 13.6 F.G 6 c I PAD=21.9 I FL I 1 v 2 o v 20' � � I ( I / � � � � F.G. ° � I �� -4�9% I \ �0� o`' L I PAD „-„-„ o 14. / 1 / �� (PAD=418:9) l I (TRAIL 5. I II II III �� • 1 / I / r I _ 1 (PAD409.0) II III � ) ��o I ��� / I �` / �q, / / 33.50' s'ss J 8"ss s \ 8°ss 8" ss 8"ss 8"s 8"ss �� 8»ss ;Q. l I I 1 \ I \ \ ti 0.9 .2 A I � NO° 00 45.5�' � / F` PROPOSED PUBLIC - - I DF c,�' D 1 1 1 I ��v 5.00' \ I / 1 4 \ -------------------� F IMPROVEMENTS PER o -- -- \ I/ > DEDICATION �� I f 1012 ' �_ O IIII II ;; / ECH OUNTAI PLAC SEPARATE PLANS �� l--==_4_====_ r 8»W 8"W 8»W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W W \JQL Ll 0 0 660.13' 290.5' , / ! S00° 00' _ - / - _ - - - - _ - - - _ -=_ _ - - 3 f _c� - APNr 0�26 102-08-_ _ _ _ _ - - _ - - - - - - -_- S _ _ - -_ -_ - _ M - 15 - c� p� c�J / TRACT-BOUNLnJA J FLOOD -Q-WROL� - - - - - - - - -f - - - - - --c�G -_ - - - - - - -C - /� - ��� Iti F / / = I / A I z � � � � = o I I A I v �� b 1 I\ S L 1 LEGEND: ---------- ---- ------ ------------- ------------------ = WQMP BASIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET 5 O4 ALL WALLS OVER 3 FEET HIGH (MEASURED FROM LOWER GROUND SURFACE WALL 30 0 30 L________________________i TO TOP OF WALL) SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED PER A SEPARATE PERMIT. � Ft' scale 1 "= 30' to=t = PROPOSED 5" THICK CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREACD O 12' 12' 12' WALL 19' 14' 12' PROPOSED SOUND SEE ADDITIONAL SECTIONS ON SHEET 3 WALL TOP OF WALL ® = PROPOSED 2'x2' STORMDRAIN INLET PER SHEET 3 O1 0 0 1427.25 1 412.77 FF WALL REFERENCES ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY = PROPOSED BLOCKWALL BY OTHERS (REFERENCE ONLY) OO .s, 3 15 420.67 FF J'`� WILSHIRE (XXX.XX) = PAD ELEVATIONS PER TTM ON BM 150 �0 4 DRIVE CONSTRUCTION NOTES ��o> EXISTING 6q INSTALL 2'X2' BROOKS BOX PER PRIVATE STORM DRAIN PLAN SHEET 3. �� l9 EXISTING GROUND N J COPLEY GROUND SECTION C-C oo L- ) -CONSTRUCT 5" CONCRETE PAVEMENT PER CONCRETE SECTION ON SHEET 4.. DRIVE CO S ALE 1' = 20' 4 �o ECTION A-A a-DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCKWALL PER SEPARATE PLAN SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL (FOR REFERENCE ONLY)... �>Q SCALE 1' = 20' 406.44 - CITY WQMP BASIN PER WQMP SITE PLAN SHEET 6.. FL s DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: WALL 3 FT HIGH MASONRY �-CONSTRUCT DRIVEWAY (W=16') PER SEPARATE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN. WROUGHT 3IRON ON TOP 44' 15' 8' 12' CITY OF RANCHO C U CAM O N GA -WATER LATERAL AND METER PER SEPARATE WATER IMPROVEMENT PLAN. 3 FT HIGH MASONRY 1411.27 FF PRECISE GRADING PLANS 7a-VCP SEWER LATERAL PER SEPARATE SEWER IMPROVEMENT PLAN.. WALL 14' 44' [WROUGHTIRON ALL W/3 FT. 4% 4, 4 ON TOP -4q TRACT NO. 19917 -10' WIDE PRIVATE ACCESS GATE.... 22 21 5 30' � � CD CONTRACTOR TO LEAVE HOLE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE WALL TO ALLOW FOR DRAINAGE.. o�O��CG' ' \o � -o � PRECISE GRADING PLAN 417.27 F CONCRETE GUTTER 10 - INSTALL 4.5' WIDE CONCRETE VALLEY GUTTER D=4"... 4 4 -% 11 - INSTALL 4" THICK DECOMPOSED GRANITE (DG)... 415.67 FF -2% 9 0 cn o ` Q OFESS/ N 12 - CONSTRUCT CONCRETE WATER BAR PER CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STANDARD DWG 1012. EXISTING GROUND �� �o q�F DESIGN PLAN PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDED o EXISTING � o� � L- �`� 1� Fs �� DAVID EVANS Q 13 -CONSTRUCT GATE WITH STEP THROUGH ���6F� Ln GROUND �s� � -EXISTING 9� m AU aNDASSOCIATES INC. � No.87222 � DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 250 TM O SHEET 14 - EXISTING FENCE TO BE REMOVED TO COMPLETE A STANDARD 20-FOOT INTERIOR COMMUNITY TRAIL.. SECTION B-B -2% SECTION D-D SEC ION E-E * * Ontario California 91764 SCALE 1' = 20' SCALE 1' = 20: SCALE 1' = 20' CIV1� �Q � OF -11 15 - SOUND WALL PER SEPARATE PLAN (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) `� qTF OF CALF CHECKED R.G.E. No 87222 DRAWING No. 16 - CORRAL AREA PER ARCHITECT PLANS AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE No i I PROPOSED 5' RETAINING WALL W/ I PROPOSED 8" RETAINING WALL W/ PROPOSED 1' RETAINING WALL W/ 3'-6" BLOCK WALL ! 5'-8" BLOCK WALL 5'-6" BLOCK WALL 7-7' LOT ECHO MOUNTAIJ PLACE LOT 10 7 12' 18' h`O R/W 411.67 FF ���' F� 12' 18' 18' 11' LOT ECHO MOUNTAIN LACE i ---------- �g R W st>> i Ica•�c� 0o J3% PROPOSED S� i \'x SIDEWALK '�S ------- PROPOSED - ----- Ell - --- I PROPOSED ,ems>� COBBLE STONE PARKWAY PROPOSED COBBLE STONE S CTION F-F PARKWAY SCALE 1' = 20' SECTION G-G SCALE 1' = 20' SECTION H-H SCALE 1' = 20' PROPOSED 6' i BLOCK WALL 5' 6' i 5' 5' PROPOSED 2'-4" RETAINING WALL W/ o 4'-10" BLOCK WALL o --------------- PROPOSED 415.67 FF 12 18 18 11 1' RETAINING WALL W/ 2, ° 5'-6" BLOCK WALL L T ECHO MOUNTAIN PLACE PROPOSED 6' 41344 _ 4 ---- BLOCK WALL— FS _4q, I R/W PROPOSED I 412.77 FF i ' I -- 8' 5' 5' --- - - SIDEWALK �p89 \\ 11' 13' 2 0 ----- S 0 420.67 FF 41� p 2 FS ----- PROPOSED 417.27 FFL3i COBBLE STONE j LOT 3 -3- - PARKWAY 422.57 FF - I n J 00 i Ui i i SECTION L-L SECTION I-I I � � SCALE 1' = 20' SCALE 1' SECTION J-J SCALE 1' = 20' SECTION K-K SCALE 1' = 20' DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY APPROVED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRECISE GRADING PLANS TRACT NO. 19917 SECTIONS Q,�OFESS1041 ql�. DESIGN RECOMMENDED Fx �c AU DAVID EVANS Q m ANDASSOCIATES INC. � No.87222 � DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 3 OF 17 J� c I V I� �Q' qTF OF OhL\F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE NO U.S.PATENT#6,00,023&6,877,029 CD O O � GRATE a 2424 CAST IRON GRATE 2424 TOP SECTION (WITH GALVANIZED FRAME) F LL Ur "ULTIMATE" BYPASS FEATURE ELEV L 0 T # ELEV "ULTIMATE" BYPASS (LOUVERS & OPENINGS) i FEATURES SEE DETAIL C "ULTIMATE" BYPASS FEATURE PARKWAY 112lbs. (LOUVERS & OPENINGS) 2424 STEEL GRATES ' ,. I_IIIVI BY MIR , I i a PARKWAY 481bs. j/ Y4.. l ELEV N ") f GASKET DEPTH TRAFFIC 1031bs. 24" \ \' ELEV ELEV 1 ELEV 1 STANDARD = 20 INCHES 57� SEE STAINLESS STEEL SHALLOW = 12 INCHES a �� CHART SUPPORT BASKET *CUSTOM o 26" �.. . a Fossil Rock TM B :� ABSORBENT POUCHES o �j 2424 LOWER SECTION (NO FRAME) fu r NI cu \ NOTE: USE 12", 18",24"LOWERS TO q i LINER DETAIL B 26" INCREASE DEPTH UP TO AMAXIMUM OF 72" F.F. ELEV. i SECTION VIEW DETAIL C 21/4" PAD ELEV I FloGard®FILTER "ULTIMATE" 7 SUPPORT -INSTALLED- BYPASS FEATURES r � 2424 STEEL COVER I 0 Ii r BASKET I' ELEV PARKWAY 81 lbs. 24~ 24" 4 TRAFFIC 114 lbs. tELEV lie ' *MANY OTHER STANDARD&CUSTOM SIZES&DEPTHS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 1 1��� S E ELE CHART � ELEV' ELEV _ELEV �_ELEV SPECIFIER CHART tT , -�- � � CATCH BASIN ;!�-,�', R (FLAT GRATE STYLE) STANDARD&SHALLOW STANDARD DEPTH SHALLOW DEPTH 1 1 IRS 0CA DEPTH -20 Inches 12 Inches- MODEL NO. (Data in these E F EI volumes is the same for MODEL NO. both STANDARD&SHALLOW versions) 261/4" '14 261/4" F STANDARD SHALLOW INLET ID GRATE OD TOTAL SOLIDS FILTERED SOLIDS FILTERED 34" 34" DEPTH Inside Outside BYPASS STORAGE FLOW DEPTH STORAGE FLOW DETAIL A Dimension Dimension CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY TYPICAL LOT F INSHED GRADING EXPLODED VIEW (inch x inch) (inch x inch) (cu.ft./sec.) (cu.ft.) (cu. ft./sec.) (cu.ft.) (cu. ft./sec.) \� FGP-12F 12 X 12 12 X 14 2.8 0.3 0.4 FGP-12F8 .15 .25 2424 BOTTOM SECTION (WITH OR WITHOUT FRAME) FOR ILLUSTRATIONDTTD $GALE FiLEF"os>1 oI�L FGP-16F 16 X 16 16 X 19 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-16F8 .45 .4 NOTES: W� ° FGP-18F 18 X 18 18 X 20 4.7 0.8 0.7 FGP-18F8 .45 .4 1.GRATES AND COVERSAVAILABLE PAINTED BLACK OR GALVANIZED 1, SCALE TO BE CUT IN AT IX MIN. AT ROUGH GRADE 2."ADA'GRATES AVAILABLE IN PARKWAY&TRAFFIC . FGP-1824F 16 X 22 18 X 24 5.0 1.5 1.2 FGP-1824F8 .85 .7 AND PRIOR TO BUILDING C❑NSTRCUTI❑N, 3."HEEL PROOF"GRATES/g/AILABLE IN PARKWAY ONLY FGP-1836F 18 X 36 18 X 40 6.9 11 2.3 1.6 FGP-1836FB 1.3 .9 2. A. PAVED DRAINAGE SVAILE, CATCH BASIN, & PIPE, 4.A TOP SECTION WITH FRAME MUST BE USED IF BOLT DOWN REQUIRED OR OTHER SIMILAR DRAINAGE DEVICE IS REQUIRED FGP-2024F 18 X 22 20 X 24 5.9 1.2 1.0 FGP-2024F8 .7 .55 //\ 24" 24" WHEN A STOOP; FIREPLpiI FGP-21 F 22 X 22 22 X 24 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-21 F8 1.25 .85 • . OR P❑R;TI❑NI OF THE BUILDING EXTENDS WITHIN MINIMUM ESTABLISHED DRAINAGE SETBAI NOTES: FGP-24F 24 X 24 24 X 27 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-24F8 1.25 .85 SECTION HIT. LBS KNOCK-OUTS FGP-2430F 24 X 30 26 X 30 7.0 2.8 1.8 FGP-2430F8 1.6 1.05 2424 T6 6" 270 NONE 3 THIS DESIGN GUIDE LINE IS FOR STANDARD 1. Filter insert shall have a high flow bypass feature. FGP-2436F 24 X 36 24 X 40 8.0 3.4 2.0 FGP-2436FB 1.95 1.15 2424 T12 12" 495 (4)6"x 11" SEE CONDITIONS. IIEVEL❑PAENT IN HILLSIDE AREAS MAY CHART @PAIR, FROM THE Y30VE FGP-2448F 24 X 4$ 26 X 48 9.3 4.4 2.4 FGP-2448F8 2.5 1.35 2424 T18 18" 745 (4)9"x 12" 2. Filter support frame shall be constructed from stainless steel Type 304. FGP-28F 28 X 28 32 X 32 6.3 2.2 1.5 FGP-28F8 1.25 .85 2424 T24 24" 870 (4)14"x 14" FGP-30F 30 X 30 30 X 34 8.1 3.6 2.0 FGP-30F8 2.05 1.15 3. Filter medium shall be Fossil Rock TM installed and FGP-36F 36 X 36 36 X 40 9.1 4.6 2.4 FGP-36F8 2.65 1.35 SECTION' _ KNOCK-OUTS TRENCH WIDTH ® maintained in accordance with manufacturer specifications. FGP-3648F 36 X 48 40 X 48 11.5 6.8 3.2 FGP-3648F8 3.9 1.85 4.. FloGard FILTER 2424 E6 s" 1 270 NONE -INSTALLED INTO CATCH BASIN- o FGP-48F 48X48 48X54 13.2 9.5 3.9 FGP-48F8 5.45 2.25 4. Storage capacity reflects 80/o of maximum solids collection FINISHED GRADE FGP-SD24F 24X24 28X28 6.1 2.2 1.5 FGP-SD24F8 1.25 .85 LOWER 34" 34" prior to impeding filtering bypass. . • • UTS U.S. PATENT#6,00,023&6,877,029 2424 L12 12" 495 (4)6"x 11" m o� SO f R O 2424 L18 18" 745 (4)9"x 12" FloGard@ 0 Oldcastle F/oGardO ® 2424 L24 24" 870 (4)14"x 14" �-'_�`�� N Stormwater Solutions ILIOldcastle BOTTOM 24"x 24" AV"AWW/AW z 7921 Southpark Plaza,Suite 2001 Littleton,CO 1801201 Ph:800.579.8819 1 oldcastlestormwater.com Stormwater Solutions • • • PR OD U07S 12" Catch Basin Insert Filter THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLOCASTLE PRECAST,INC.IT IS SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE 7921South ark Plaza,Suite Littleton,CO 80120 Ph:800.579.8819 oldcastlestormwater.com CATCH BASIN 0 USED IN ANY WAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY.COPYRIGHT 92010OLOCASTLEPRECAST,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Catch Basin Insert Filter P I 2424 B30 30" 1595 (4)18"x 18" P E R F. THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF OLDCASTLE PRECAST,INC.IT IS SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE CO Inlet DRAWING N0. REV ECo ECO-0142 DATE USED IN ANYWAY INJURIOUS TO THE INTERESTS OF SAID COMPANY.COFYRIGHTV2010 OLDCASTLE PRECAST,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. DWG. _ _ PIPE JPR 7 13 16 / / Inlet DRAWING NO. REV Eco DATE N GRAVEL FILL MATERIAL Filtration rated Inlet Style FGP-0' G JPR 11 3 O6 SHEET 1 OF 2 ECo-0142 2424 B36 36" 1905 (4)18 x 18" 11-23 99 02 28-00 Filtration Grated Inlet Style FGP-0001 G JPR 7 13 16 JPR 11/3/06 SHEET 2 OF 2 3/4" WASHED PEA GRAVEL 24" 12" PERFORATED SDR-35 PVC UNDERDRAIN, SOLVENT WELD PIPE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH PERFORATION FACING DOWN. 12" PERFORATED PIPE TRENCH NOT TO SCALE 7 6 No. 3 BARS SPACED AT 24" (INCHES) ON CENTER, EACH WAY. 1 5 "ZT 2 e ' a a , 9 a � CLASS 520-C-2500 CONCRETE PER 3 S.S.P.W.C. SECTION 201-1 REQUIREMENTS. a 4 _ EXPOSED EXCAVATED SURFACE SOILS SHALL BE III a d - SCARIFIED A MIN. OF 12" IN DEPTH, MOISTENED TO NEAR THE OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT, AND S o o�o 0 0 a a - COMPACTED TO A RELATIVE COMPACTION OF AT ° - LEAST 90% (ASTM D 1557). r4n 006 °� 0 0 ° 0 0 00° 0 8 0 0 - CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION NOT TO SCALE LEGEND: 1. CONCRETE HARDSCAPE 5. EXPANSION JOINT 2. 1/4" RADIUS ALL EDGES 6. SUB-BASE MATERIAL 3. 2" MINIMUM 7. 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4. FINISH GRADE NOTE: • REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR MIN. THICKNESS OF TRENCH WIDTH CONCRETE. FINISHED GRADE HARDSCAPE TO LANDSCAPE DETAIL Lj Lj DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY NOT TO SCALE � � � SO o� APPROVED: m ^ L N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CD -- ; z - 012 „SD PRECISE GRADING PLANS PIPE N BEDDING MATERIAL TRACT NO. 19917 35 < SAND EQUIVALENT 90% COMPACTION 12" STORMDRAIN PIPE TRENCH DETAILS AND SECTIONS SHEET NOT TO SCALE QW ESS/ON q< � DESIGN RECOMMENDED CID ��� FJq �� AU DAVID EVANS Q c? rrn ANDASSOCIATES INC. LU No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET * * Ontario California 91764 4 OF 17 J� HIV 1�- �Q' q�F OF CpI�F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12�09/2020 FILE NO r oP SU TES , ` T. -I I I I II I GARAGEEl OE] I I L _ _ I I I I I II I I ID OPT PATIO COVER I I � i J l � I D I I CD j I I I I I N� II Imo` I I� Z I � I � I I w O I, W UP- II 0) 00 d �u � \ cn TRACT NO 18122 EXISTING STREET PLANS - - - EXISTING STREET PLANS EXISTING 24" STORMDRAIN PER STREET PLANS PER TRACT NO. 18122 PER STREET PLANS DWG. NO. STORMDRAIN 7 LOT 18 LOT 1 LOT 20 DWG. N0. 2356 TRACT NO. 18122 S "SS DWG. N0. 2356 APN. 0225-08 -10 LOT 16 I APN: 0225-085-09 APN: 0225-0 -01 APN: 0225- 2-02 LO LOT 22 APN: 0225-062- APN: 25 062-04 \� ACT BOUND Y NV OUT - - TRACT BO DARY - ° ao l ° ° ° ° I _ - - o (� o - - - - - - o _ - \ 407.85 TG it -__ O I 420.32 --: 420.80 TG �� I I I // \ � 406.51 INV IN. ul ���� I INV 418.83 INV IN CORRAL N I I cv CORRAL N CORRAL N CORRAL CORRAL N 61 e - 11111111 ! !! !! !! ! I 6 L - _ 0 3 I I III 24 "91' 0 - li 0 3 e . , , e I I I l i I 24 24 24 24 N Q � I I - - ----- - ------------- - - ----- I !I !I III 111 11 11 I L 18 1 1 o III II III �i i --- --- -- Iji o FF=410.67 o ��o II I.' FF=423.87 I I N PAD=410.00 5 PAD=423.20 I N 12 66 406.80 TG 6�, 5 405.38 INV IN ° 420.36 TG • 419.04 INV IN I D 406.74 INV OUT e ° e °° 419.94 420.25 INV OUT J I n 406.38 o I� o INV OUT = - I D I --I 406.80 TG- - INV OUT L J�O W I� I __1 N Z 405.30 INV IN 420.41 TG _ I PROPOSED 18" RCP PER �j, r • I I I o r O SEPARATE STORM DRAIN 418.83 INV IN >>6 I I I N� � 1405.23 I' I I I II PLANS •� I Z I I �' OD 11 I INV OUT 1;3,; I e I C; Co CIO e I D I I N D I 407.22 TG , I I I o O n 12' I I 403.00 INV IN II I e e , I -�CAI I Vco 9Ica 406.57 INV OUTI 406.31 N I o O = - C i I FF=411.34 INV OUT 5 o i III r� - Z I J PAD-410.67 I I : I 1417.11 I 1� 2 6 5 OUT 2 I I I I COI , �; Ill v, I I I I O 46 FF=423.57 Lj I I r` N FF=415.67 FF=417.27 PAD=422.90 I V, I 1� o FF=412.77 PAD=415.00 PAD=416.60 FF=420.67 ! I! I! I I ! I I I 1 e PAD=412.10 PAD=420.00 e 1 11 N CORRAL L '3 I / 5 e e 1417.82 I ' III I i � I ° 11 .I 11 I 8S � I 407.69 TG 407.98 TG I ; N INV OU c I ''-''419.47 TG 3� % I 24 ,�,"' � I \ ° I 406.18 INV IN • 406.97 INV IN 418 99 - 417.92 INV IN ---- ,gyp 407.67 INV OUT ® INV OUT 419.30 INV OUT -------_ I 2 2 2 I ^ I I 6Q� , 407.37 6 1417.07 5 ���'� 1 10 `^! O11 ° e INV OUT INV 419.96 TG • I I I I z ` / I I 409.67 TG II 414.24 TG o 416.99 TG �; 417.55 INV IN N rn (n e 408.30 1 N V I N 2 r_-__ 412.74 INV I N --- _ 415.47 INV I N --- - ---- -1 e 419.71 TG I I �v CORRAL I 0 ,I l�l -- _ -----_ - ---------------= Q I I 2 I ____= 409.46 INV OUT 5 I,-- ---------- ---------- I 5 414.03 INV OU __________= 416.73 15 OUT-T-====__ - 3 =1415.03 i t 416.87 INV I N I I D i' 2 ----------------------- 3 •• ---- ------- ------ ----- '-------- --- -------= 3 ----- 2 --------------------- ----------------------- -- ----------------------- IL 2 ------ , � � I I --- -- -- ----- ,-------------------------; 5 _ �I I�----- - ----INV _i .•o _ -- O I U i I 2 "411.60 TG_------ -31.93 -- ---------- _ ---- o �' I „ 1408.25 6 L • 410.60 INV IN L • L II' '• / , o0 D I I lO 2 408.35 TG i; INV OUT e411.30 INV OUT ii ii V - -, 417.79 TG FF-411.67 �I I I I I I I 407.23 INV IN 411.00 TG 411.03 FF=422.57 I I I 12 ;; ;; ;; '\\\ 409.19 INV OUT 413.43 TG INV OU$ 416.49 415.05 INV IN 4 PAD=421.90 PAD=411.00 III I I I I II 409.50 INV IN 18 24 °0 1416.87 I I I \ INV OUT- 8'ss 8'ss a" s 8"ss 411.93 INV IN • 8"ss 8"s -INV OUT 8"ss - 8"ss 11 11 11 I INV OUT INV OUT I I I \ - - - - - - - - - r------------ II II •192 0 PROPOSED SEWER PROPOSED STREET o '__________________--------- 1: __ $W IMPROVEMENTS PER EC O MOUNTAIN PLACE IMPROVEMENTS PER SEPARATE " 418.79 TG' IE====________ _______ N o L SEPARATE SEWER PLANS- 8"w 8"W 811W - ---------------- STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS 8"W "' 415.23 INV IN o I I I I I I IJ L ,. =,° 18 '----------=------------- I ------------- -----4 .50 INV OUT _ � I L L . ; 8:63 FG S=0.013 L4 0 0 0 o 0 ° ' ° o ° ° 417.00 INV PROPOSED WATER N IMPROVEMENTS PER � I^ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\ `� I TRACT BOUNDARY SEPARATE WATER PLANS o z c� o \ n APN: 0226-102-08 U) FLOOD CONTROL CITY ° DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: LEGEND: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA -�`- CONSTRUCTION NOTES ____ PRECISE GRADINGPLAN I�_=_= - _I = WQMP BASIN PER DETAIL ON SHEET 6 TRACT NO. 19917 1�===____-_'IINSTALL 2'X2' BROOKS BOX (OR APPROVED EQUAL) PER DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET 4 ❑❑ = PROPOSED 2'x2' STORMDRAIN INLET PER SHEET 4 &-INSTALL 6" HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN & HORSE CORRAL = PROPOSED HORSE CORRAL &-CONSTRUCT BMP (W=16.5') PER WQMP SITE PLAN SHOWN ON SHEET 6 CORRAL LOCATION PLAN a-PROVIDE6"Hx12"W OPENING THRU THE MASONARY BLOCK WALL AT FLOWLINES (FLOWLINE ELEVATIONS PER PLAN) 30 0 30 60 scale 1"= 30' feet Q�pFESS/ON &-INSTALL 12" C.I.P. DRAINAGE PIPE WHEN PIPE CROSSES CONCRETE DRIVEWAY p ql �. DESIGN PLAN PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDED DAVID EVANS Q �-DRIVEWAY (W=16) PER SEPARATE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN a AU m ANDASSOCIATES INC. No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 250 O SHEET �-INSTALL 8" HDPE DRAINAGE PIPE * * Ontario California 91764 5 of 17 ALL PIPE MATERIALS SHALL BE PER CHAPTER 11 OF s� CIV 1\- �P �-CONSTRUCT PARKWAY DRAIN PER STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHEET 2 THE CURRENT ADOPTED CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE. q�F OF CA1 �Fo�� CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING No. AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE NO TRACT N0. 18122 - _ _ _ _ � TRACT N0. 18122 TRACT N0. 18122 0 INLET IL FILTER INLET FILTER - - o 0 0 0 00 o 0 o N BMP 1 --- O i INFILTRATION TRENCH _ 0 , °° BMP 8 18.5'Wx38.0'L `� INFILTRATION TRENCH I a ,h i - � «I« 18.5 Wx38.0 L I I I 34.137514 -117.505644 34.138966, -117505760 DMA 1 ;; :4 4 ;I L DMA 8 ( • I I« � AREA = 0.62-ac !; I« AREA = 0.67-ac 1cl� co DCV 1 , 127 cf - W l , DCV 1 ,233 cf REQ. r ` _ ' _ REQ. DVC -1 , 134-cf 7 DVC =1 ,260-cf 000, / I 00 Jill INLET FILTER \00 r AREA _0.92-ac AREA _0.69 ac AREA _0.69 ac AREA _0.92 ac Ln p , co p I CV " M DCV -1 679-d DCV -1 267-cf DCV -1 266-d DCV - 1 676-cf � BMP 2 _ L���; i; �;I INFILTRATION TRENCH i "' ' « REQ. REQ' REQ' REQ. ' � a �~ I - DVC =1 680-cf DVC =1 274-cf DVC = 77A-cf DVC =1 680-cf 18.5 Wx38.0 L ;I - J V. PROV. PROV. PR V. _ r 34.137520, 117.505475 II a INLET FILTER bcap, �• < I « « J DMA 2 00 DMA 9 t AREA = 0.61 -ac 4 o �« I« AREA = 0.68-ac U �� T � « � I,I � I 2 DCV =1 117-cf L ) / k DCV = 1 237-cf / o RE RE Q « « « « « « Q Jill DVC 1 1 20 cf III DVC 1 260 cf L _ I i PR V I I� PROV. OWN co00, Q' d - :a I J l I ���: J t �� 1 1 O - '_J BMP 9 N < l • l N INFILTRATION TRENCH � N _ I of - v, B 4 8.O L « « « « « « « « « MP 18 5'Wx3 « « « « « « « « « « «,«, INFILTRATION TRENCH 34.138962, -117.505317 � « l 1 « -- : 18.5'Wx38.0'L ' 34.137871, -117.505107 BMP 5 INLET FILTER 1 INN oa INFILTRATION TRENCH INLET FILTER NFL TRATION TRENCH BMP TRATION TRENCH I '- I 18.5 Wx38.0 L I ' 18.5'Wx38.0'L - 18.5'Wx38.0'L °° v; �.138113, -117.505100 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 34.138424, -117.505097 ------ - 34.138580, -117.505098 N `� IL • - - - - - i DMA 3 : « :«: `« :` « :« :«« - -- - -- - - - - -- - _- - -_ ----- -- - --- -- -- - -------- - ---- - -- DMA 10 00 f AREA 0.65 ac -= 4 AREA 0.73 ac 1 Q` II N I N _ _ 3 _ _ ,� r L ✓ DCV 1 189 cf __ _ _ DCV 1 328 cf RE �f� RE Q. Q. I I I F � INLET FILTER I DVC =1 190-cf Ix - - - I DVC =1330-cfPROV. � $"ss000 8"SS 8„ss „SS 8"SS\2= JJ $„ss ° �. « PROV. � ` . - -- __---- - -- - BMP 10 _ INLET FILTER �V ' _______'_ - :«' «`34.138944, -117.504925 r l / INFILTRATION TRENCH , ECHO MOUNTAIN PLACE , ----- --- - -- - N « «`« «« ««««« o L 8» a w 8 w a"w a''w a'w 8"w 18.5Wx38.OLE r 1 - - 141 I 34.137555, -117.504945 - .J , ! J ' - s .0000 LEGEND: R PROPOSED 6' 18.5' WIDTH FINISHED Infiltrating Infiltrating BLOCK WALL 12" 18" 18" 18" 12" GROUND CONCRETE HARDSCAPE EXPANSION JOINT NOTE: 19' 14' 12' AREA AREA DCV surface surface DCV 1/4 " RADIUS ALL EDGES 0 REFER TO SOILS ENGINEER'S SUB-BASE MATERIAL � � SITE BOUNDARY �- � DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA (DMA) -I I DMA 2 required area area provided 1" TO 2" INCHES MINIMUM REPORT FOR MIN. THICKNESS OF 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE - _ (ft ) (ac) �ft3) required provided �ft3) FINISH GRADE CONCRETE. INFILTRATION TRENCH _ 111- (ft2) (ft2) III- I a EG --- -- 3' DIA. 3' DIA. 3' DIA. 3' DIA. a 4 . FS 12" PVC � � » WILSHIRE "' IPERFORATED PERFORATED PERFORATED PERFORATEDI 12 PVC 1 26818 0.62 1127 289 703 3163.5 DRIVE � FLOW 1,PERFORATED FLOW I- 8 ° 0 °° ° o °° ° LANDSCAPE/RE-VEGETATE DISTURBED AREAS PIPE PIPE PIPE PIPE - �sq 2 26578 0.61 1117 286 703 3163.5 _ °°g o° 0 00 0 0 0 000 0 o o ° ° o In INLET FILTER = = 3 28303 0.65 1189 305 703 3163.5 - - - 4 39955 0.92 1679 431 703 3163.5 III 11 � III I � � VEGETATIVE DRAINAGE SWALE DETAIL 1111NATIVE ISOIL ' IIII -III 5 30137 0.69 1266 325 703 3163.5 - _ H: 1"=20' i(NON-COMPACTED} El I= 6 30137 0.69 1267 325 703 3163.5 HARDSCAPE TO LANDSCAPE DETAIL THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE INFILTRATION METHODOLOGY COMPLIES WITH THE WQMP BMP AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE V. 1 4 -1 i II 1 11 1 1 I I I 1 1 1 ��I 1 1 11 1 11 1 I I i 1T- 7 39872 0.92 1676 430 703 3163.5 NOT TO SCALE REQUIREMENT IN THE TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT FOR WATER QUALITY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NECESSARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN STORM WATER INFILTRATION TRENCH LENGTH PER PLAN 8 29340 0.67 1233 316 703 3163.5 MANAGEMENT PLANS. STRUCTURAL TREATMENT (BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE) DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED UNDER GRAVEL (40% MY SUPERVISION AND ARE FUNCTIONAL TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE DATE BELOW. INFILTRATION TRENCH POROSITY) O 31605 0.7436 G8 1328 341 703 3163.5 1237 317 703 3163.5 APPLICANT/DEVELOPER/OWNER SHAREEF AWAD z DIAR, LLC ANGEL CESAR, P.E. DATE ANGEL CESAR, P.E. DATE NITS TOTAL 312181 7.17 13119 3365 7030 31635 998 S. TEAKWOOD AVENUE 30 0 30 60 BLUE ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. BLUE ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING, INC. BLOOMINGTON, CA 92316 scale 1"= 30' feet ACREAGE OF SITE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE BMP'S GROSS 312,180 (7.17 AC) NET 252,465 (5.80 AC) INDEX BMP NAME RESPONSIBLE PARTY INSPECTION/MAINTENANCE ACTIONS REQUIRED FREQUENCY DISTURBED AREA 312,180 (7.17 AC) INFILTRATION TRENCHES WILL BE INSPECTED TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE WORKING IMPERVIOUS AREA 127,480 (2.93) INFILTRATION TRENCH PROPERTY OWNER PROPERLY. CHECK FOR SURFACE STANDING WATER AND SURFACE SEDIMENTS THAT FREQUENT VISUAL INSPECTION FOR SEDIMENTS G; CHECK ONCE A YEAR FOR MAY CLOG THE INFILTRATION TRENCH. SEDIMENTS ADDITIONAL GRADING NOTES: COMPACTION ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS SHALL BE N1: EDUCATION ON BMPS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA GENERAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED TO OCCUPANTS ONCE PER YEAR DURING WET SEASON LIMITED TO THE BUILDING PADS. ALL HOA WILL RESTRICT OCCUPANTS FROM PERFORMING ACTIVITIES THAT WOULD �1415 �� LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE STAKED TO N2: ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA ONCE PER YEAR DURING WET SEASON MINIMIZED COMPACTION DURING CITY NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE WATER QUALITY OF THE SITE DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE '�' �1414 1414 CONSTRUCTION. APPROVED: N3: LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT BMPS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA OCCUPANT RESPONSIBILITY TO MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE WEEKLY N4: BMP MAINTENANCE PROPERTY OWNER & HOA HOA SHALL MAINTAIN MONTHLY I �14 WDID #8 36C385925 �4 ,� PGR2018-00054 CITY OF RANCHO C U CAM O N GA Ni LOCAL WATER QUALITY ORDINANCES PROPERTY OWNER & HOA DEVELOPMENT MUST COMPLY WITH LOCAL WATER ORDINANCES FIRST HOA MEETING OF THE YEAR INLET SUBTT19917 N7: SPILL CONTINGENCY PLAN PROPERTY OWNER & HOA AT THE DISCRETION OF OCCUPANT TO REPORT TO APPROPRIATE JURISDICTION FIRST HOA MEETING OF THE YEAR FILTER - PRECISE GRADING PLANS THIS PROJECT WILL BE DEVELOPED AND OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 80 J4 .� / I' !'; !'; I TRACT NO. 19917 N10: UNIFORM CODE IMPLEMENTATION PROPERTY OWNER & HOA OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE FIRST HOA MEETING OF THE YEAR 1,3 / Ili II II N11: LITTER/DEBRIS CONTROL PROGRAM PROPERTY OWNER & HOA AT HOME OWNER'S/OCCUPANT'S DISCRETION WEEKLY l ;ill N14: CATCH BASIN INSPECTION PROGRAM PROPERTY OWNER & HOA HOA TO INSPECT AND MAINTAIN MONTHLY ,�.� � / :_II .I_,I � WQMP SITE PLAN N15: VACUUM SWEEPING OF PRIVATE STREETS AND PARKING LOTS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA VACUUM AND SWEEP WEEKLY 412 - N17: COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE NPDES PERMITS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA SWPPP TO BE PREPARED AS PART OF SITE CONSTRUCTION DURING CONSTRUCTION ° S1: STORM DRAIN STENCILING PROPERTY OWNER & HOA MAINTAIN STENCILING AND SIGNAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE Q�iOFESS/pN9 �t� l DESIGN .RED BY: RECOMMENDED S4: EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA MAINTAIN IRRIGATION SYSTEM WEEKLY SCALE 1" = 40' Q ``� CF�9 F�� AU DAVID EVANS Q S5: FG OF LANDSCAPE AT 1-2 INCHES BELOW TC PROPERTY OWNER & HOA MAINTAIN LANDSCAPE WEEKLY „z p,ND ASSOC I ATES INC. S6: PROTECT SLOPES/CHANNELS PROPERTY OWNER & HOA INSPECT AND MAINTAIN VEGETATED SLOPES QUARTERLY oc No.87222 `� DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 0 SHEET * * Ontario California 91764 6 OF 17 S13: HILLSIDE LANDSCAPING PROPERTY OWNER & HOA INSPECT AND MAINTAIN HILLSIDE LANDSCAPING QUARTERLY LP cIV 1� �Q q�F OF CAI\EO`�C� CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING N0. AC_ DATE 12 09 020 FILE NO U EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES c \ C o 0 A- GENERAL NOTES I _ \ � 1. EROSION CONTROL IS REQUIRED FOR GRADING OPERATIONS. DURING THE RAINY SEASON - 6 TRACT BOUNDARY 6 FROM OCTOBER 15TH TO APRIL 15TH. APPROVED PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL ROUGH GRADING TRACT NO. 18122 AND PRECISE GRADING PERMITS. TRACT BOUNDARY LOT 16 2 LOT 19 2 LOT 22 - - 11 LOT 17 LOT 18 LOT 20 4 z 2. IN CASE OF AN EMERGENCY, CALL: -X -' - - -X- - - 2 - - - TRACT BOUNDARY Y �� rr7 ROF - SHAREEF AWAD o N ACE _ o -------------------------------------------- 1 0 3 - (RESPONSIBLE PERSON) -= 5 7 9 10 1 5 // I <° DIAR LLC ---------------------------------------- II II t o • e e f-If-If-;;-1 (FIRM) l , ; ; � I I co AT: 909-519- 1355 6 , ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ____ IIIIIIII 8 I_. 1 I_l. � (24-HOUR PHONE N0.) � 1 � 3. CLEARING AND GRUBBING SHOULD BE LIMITED TO AREAS THAT WILL RECEIVE IMMEDIATE ' GRADING. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROTECT AREAS WHICH HAVE BEENLL 3 00 CLEARED AND GRUBBED PRIOR TO GRADING OPERATION, AND WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO RUNOFF S 1I e 60' N DURING THE RAINY SEASON. THESE MEASURES MAY INCLUDE BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TO: = 3 3 5 4 = GRADED DITCHES, BRUSH BARRIERS, AND SILT FENCES. CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED TO PRESERVE 3 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 3 VEGETATION BEYOND LIMITS OF GRADING. 2 2' g' 18' 1," 3 4. CITY APPROVAL OF PLANS DOES NOT RELIEVE THE DEVELOPER FROM RESPONSIBILITY FOR I II ... •• THE CORRECTION OF ERROR AND OMISSION DISCOVERED DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE REQUIRED PLAN REVISION SHALL BE PROMPTLY SUBMITTED TO THE CITY ENGINEER, OR DESIGNEE. I H II e W e III J n II ' (L e 1 3 e p 5. EQUIPMENT AND WORKERS FOR EMERGENCY WORK SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE AT ALL '! O I W I I �� o - TIMES DURING THE IOUV I I RAINY SEASON. NECESSARY MATERIALS SHALL BE AVAILABLE ON SITE AND STOCKPILED AT CONVENIENT LOCATIONS TO FACILITATE RAPID CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY DEVICES WHEN RAIN Z 1 `� FF=1412.20 FF=1413.90 FF=1416.90 ;; 2 I 0 FF=1419.20 ' (n o I IS IMMINENT. o 6. DEVICES SHALL NOT BE MOVED OR MODIFIED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY E9 ,L e e III II II I e e 3 iI II II I 3 ENGINEER. ------ 7. ALL REMOVABLE PROTECTIVE DEVISES SHOWN SHALL BE IN PLACE AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY WHEN THE 5-DAY RAIN PROBABILITY FORECAST EXCEEDS 40%. 3 = oa 3 N 8. AFTER A RAINSTORM, ALL SILT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM CHECK BERMS, SILT FENCES, AND DE-SILTING BASIN, ETC. e 3 9. GRADED AREAS AROUND THE PROJECT PERIMETER MUST DRAIN AWAY FROM THE FACE OF ________ _ ____ ____________ ___ SLOPE AT THE CONCLUSION OF EACH WORKING DAY. 2 �' ___- _ ____-' `________________ ------------ - 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE AND SHALL TAKE NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO - - PREVENT PUBLIC TRESPASS ONTO AREAS WHERE IMPOUNDED WATER CREATES A HAZARDOUS 10 CONDITION. 11. DE-SILTING BASINS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS GRADING OF INDIVIDUAL GRADING AREAS ARE COMPLETE PER ROUGH GRADING PLANS. III II III _______ 12 II II E O MO AIN P ACE 1 _ 3 12. THE CITY ENGINEER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS TO PLAN 1 _________________ N AS DEEMED NECESSARY. ; 13. INFORMATION ON THIS PLAN IS FOR EROSION CONTROL ONLY. 14. TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR MANUFACTURED SLOPES PRIOR TO I \ o - - - - -� -' 1 2 TRACT BOUNDARY 2 PERMANENT PLANTING. 1 c-, o 15. AREAS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN SUCH A STATE THAT FIRE ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED J� APN: 0226-102-08 AT ALL TIMES (INCLUDING ACCESS TO NEIGHBORHOOD PROPERTIES). \ M � FLOOD CONTROL 16. NO OBSTRUCTION OR DISTURBANCE OF NATURAL DRAINAGE COURSES OR EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLETS SHALL OCCUR DURING THE RAINY SEASON, UNLESS ADEQUATE TEMPORARY/PERMANENT DRAINAGE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED AND INSTALLED. EROSION CONTROL GENERAL NOTES CONTINUE CONSTRUCTION NOTES SCHEDULE 17. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT THE OPERATION IN SUCH A MANNER THAT STORM LEGEND RUNOFF WILL BE CONTAINED WITHIN THE PROJECT OR CHANNELED INTO THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM O INSTALL SILT FENCE PER DETAIL ON SHEET 8 WHICH SERVES THE RUNOFF AREA. STORM RUNOFF FROM ONE AREA SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO 24. ANY SLOPES WITH DISTURBED SOILS OR DENUDED VEGETATION MUST BE STABILIZED TO GRADING START MAY 2 9 DIVERT TO ANOTHER RUNOFF AREA3 INHIBIT EROSION BY WIND AND WATER. ° - STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE/EXIT O INSTALL 6' CHAINLINK FENCE WITH WIND SCREEN END MAY 2019 18. THE PERMITTEE SHALL PUT INTO EFFECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES 25. SEDIMENTS AND OTHER MATERIALS MAY NOT BE TRACKED FROM THE SITE BY VEHICLE O INSTALL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION PER DETAIL ON SHEET 8 UTILITY START MAY 2019 NECESSARY TO PROTECT ADJACENT WATERCOURSES AND PUBLIC OR PRIVATE PROPERTY FROM TRAFFIC. THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ROADWAYS MUST BE STABILIZED TO INHIBIT SEDIMENTS END AUG. 2019 DAMAGE BY EROSION, FLOODING, AND DEPOSITION OF MUD OR DEBRIS ORIGINATION FROM THE FROM BEING DEPOSITED INTO THE PUBLIC WAY. ACCIDENTAL DEPOSITIONS MUST BE SWEPT UP - MATERIAL / EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA O CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WITH CORRUGATED STEEL PLATES PER DETAIL ON SITE DURING THE GRADING OPERATION. IMMEDIATELY AND MAY NOT BE WASHED DOWN BY RAIN OR OTHER MEANS. SHEET 8 FOUNDATIONS START AUG. 20 END MAR. 2020 19. CONFORMANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THESE PLANS SHALL IN NO WAY RELIEVE THE 26. STOCKPILES OF EARTH AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED MATERIALS MUST BE PROTECTED O INSTALL CHAIN LINK DOUBLE GATE CONTRACTOR FROM HIS RESPONSIBILITIES TO THIS SITE AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES. TEMPORARY FROM BEING TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE BY THE FORCES OF WIND AND WATER. - WASHOUT PIT 40 0 40 80 EROSION CONTROL SHALL CONSIST OF, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT, O CONTRACTOR TO STREET SWEEP OR VACUUM STREET PER CASQA SE-7 CONTROL AND ABATE WATER, MUD, DUST CONTROL, AND EROSION DAMAGE TO PUBLIC AND 27. FUELS, OILS, SOLVENTS AND OTHER TOXIC MATERIALS MUST BE STORED IN ACCORDANCE scale 1 "= 40' feet PRIVATE PROPERTY AS A RESULT OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. WITH THEIR LISTING AND ARE NOT TO CONTAMINATE THE SOIL AND SURFACE WATERS. ALL O- EROSION CONTROL DEVICE STOCKPILE CONSTRUCT MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT STORAGE AREA. COVER ALL POTENTIAL SOURCES OF APPROVED STORAGE CONTAINERS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM THE WEATHER. SPILLS MUST BE POLLUTANTS DURING RAIN EVENTS AND SURROUND STORAGE AREA WITH GRAVEL BAGS. THIS IS A 20. SLOPES CONSTRUCTED PRIOR TO OCTOBER 1ST SHALL BE TREATED FOR EROSION CONTROL CLEANED UP IMMEDIATELY AND DISPOSED OF IN A PROPER MANNER. SPILLS MAY NOT BE WASHED TEMPORARY STORAGE AREA AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STOCK PILING SOIL AND PAVING PRIOR TO OCTOBER 15. SLOPES CONSTRUCTED AFTER OCTOBER 1ST SHALL BE TREATED FOR INTO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. MATERIALS OR PRESSURE TREATED WOOD. EXACT LOCATION OF STORAGE AREA TO BE DETERMINED EROSION CONTROL AS THE CONSTRUCTION OF SLOPE PROGRESSES. - SAMPLING LOCATION BY SITE SUPERINTENDENT. CONTRACTOR MUST BE SURE THAT APPROPRIATE SPILL AND LEAK 28. EXCESS OR WASTE CONCRETE MAY NOT BE WASHED INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF-WAY OR PREVENTION MEASURES ARE IN PLACE. PLACE AT A LOCATION FURTHEST FROM OUTLET. TO BE 21. FILL AREAS WHILE BEING BROUGHT UP TO GRADE AND DURING PERIODS OF COMPLETION ANY DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE TO RETAIN CONCRETE WASTES ON-SITE IMPLEMENTED ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. PRIOR TO FINALE GRADE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY VARIOUS MEASURES TO ELIMINATE EROSION UNTIL THEY CAN BE DISPOSED OF AS SOLID WASTE. AND THE SILTATION OF DOWNSTREAM FACILITIES AND ADJACENT AREAS. THESE MEASURES MAY - RUN-OFF SAMPLE POINT/ DISCHARGE POINT Og CONSTRUCT TWO WASHOUT PIT FACILITIES PER DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET 5. ONE PIT IS TO BE USED INCLUDE BUT SHALL NOT BE LIMITED TEMPORARY DOWN DRAINS, EITHER IN THE FORM OF PIPES 29. ALL NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES, UNLESS ACCEPTED OR AUTHORIZED BY AN NPDES FOR CONCRETE WASTE, AND THE OTHER WILL SERVE AS A MISCELLANEOUS WASHOUT PIT FOR OR PAVED DITCHES WITH PROTECTED OUTFALL AREAS; GRADED BERMS AROUND AREAS TO PERMIT, REQUIRE PRIOR APPROVAL BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. DRYWALL, PAINTS, ETC. EXACT LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY SITE SUPERINTENDENT BUT SHALL ELIMINATE EROSION OF FILL SLOPES BY SURFACE RUNOFF; CONFINED WITH PONDING AREAS TO c� - CONTROL POINT BE LOCATED MORE THAN 50 FEET AWAY FROM A STORM DRAIN, OPEN DITCH OR SURFACE WATER. DE-SILT RUNOFF; TEMPORARY CHECK DAMS IN TOE OF SLOPE DITCHES TO DE-SILT RUNOFF; 30. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED SOLID WASTE MUST BE DEPOSITED INTO A COVERED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. PROTECTION SUCH AS SAND BAGS AROUND INLETS WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN BROUGHT UP TO RECEPTACLE TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF RAINWATER AND DISPERSAL BY WIND. GRADE; AND EARTH BERMS AND APPROPRIATE GRADING TO DIRECT DRAINAGE AWAY FROM THE - PORTABLE TOILETS O9 INSTALL ON-SITE PORTABLE TOILETS AS SHOWN. THE PORTABLE TOILETS SHALL NOT BE IN PUBLIC EDGE OF THE TOP OF SLOPES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED ON THOSE FILL AREAS 31. CONSTRUCTION SITES SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT RIGHT OF WAY, AND SHALL NOT BE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO CATCH BASINS. PLACE AT A LOCATION WHERE EARTH WHERE EARTHWORK OPERATIONS ARE NOT IN PROGRESS. PRACTICES IN SUCH A MANNER THAT POLLUTANTS ARE NOT DISCHARGED FROM THE SITE. FURTHEST FROM INLET. SURROUND PORTABLE TOILETS WITH GRAVEL BAGS OR PLACE APPROVED RUNOFF FLOW PATTERN CONTAINMENT PAN BENEATH. TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON AN AS NEEDED BASIS. 22. TOP OF CUT BROWN DITCHES, WHERE REQUIRED ON THE PLANS, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED 32. ERODED SEDIMENTS AND OTHER POLLUTANTS MUST BE RETAINED ON-SITE AND MAY NOT BE CITY PRIOR TO EXCEEDING 10 FEET OF CUT MEASURED VERTICALLY. TRANSPORTED FROM THE SITE VIA SHEET FLOW, SWALES, AREA DRAINS, NATURAL DRAINAGE OR X_ 10 STOCKPILE EROSION CONTROL DEVICES READY TO BE PLACED IN POSITION WHEN RAIN IS DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: WIND. CHAIN LINK FENCE 23. THE TIRES OF VEHICLES BEING USED ON-SITE SHALL BE INSPECTED AND WASHED IF BASIS. OR WHEN DIRECTED BY THE INSPECTOR. TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON AN AS NEEDED CITY OF RANCHO C U CAM O N GA NECESSARY TO STOP TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. IF EXPORT OR IMPORT OF DIRT 33. DUST CONTROL. THE OWNER OF THE SITE OR THE PROJECT CONTRACTOR SHALL PUT INTO GRAVEL BAGS IS TO BE L DONE, PAVED ORT TO FACLHTATE THE NSPENG CTION AND CLEANING 0 TIR ALIWHI LEAST B OS FRONT THE S TE ADJACENT LONG T AND MAINTAIN 11 PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES NECESSARY TO PREVENT DUST BLOWING INSTALL DUST CONTROL SIGN PER DETAIL ON SHEET 8. SHAL BE PROVIDED AT H EX PRECISE GRADING PLANS "RUMBLE STRIPS" MADE FROM STEEL, RAILROAD TRACK, OR SIMILAR MATERIALS CAN HELP REDUCE PROPERTIES. STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 12 INSTALL GRAVEL BAGS PER DETAIL 2 ON SHEET 8 THE MUD GETTING ONTO THE CLEANING AREA. STREET SWEEPING AND WASHING IS STILL EQUIRED, TRACT NO. 19917 BUT MAY BE REDUCED BY PROPER USE OF A 'WHEEL WASHING AREA" LIKE THIS. THEY ARE SILT FENCE REQUIRED ON PROJECTS OVER 1 ACRES. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Q,�OfESS10N ql�. DESIGN RECOMMENDED Fx �c AU DAVID EVANS Q Z3 m ANDASSOCIATES INC. LU No.87222 `M DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 7 OF 17 J� 01 V 0- �Q qTF OF CpO CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE NO Setback varies (See note 4) Fabric section B Stake B (See notes 6. 7 &12) LEGEND Tomped bockfill GRAVELBAG SPEC. NOTES Fabric 2" x 2" Wood stoke Stake A Slope direction (See notes 3&s) _ Direction of flow 15"x3O" POLYPROPYLENE GRAVELBAGS WOVEN POLYPROPYLENE — CONSTRUCTED Toe of slope -l— � Fabric section A TO RESIST SPLITS AND LEAKAGE. WITH ANTISKID DESIGN. Slope (See notes 6, 7& 12) 6S See detail A CORRUGATED • 10 X 12 WEAVE JOINING SECTION DETAIL (TOP VIEW) 3 4" GRAVEL 12" MIN UNLESS OTHERWISE STEEL PANELS GRAVEL BAG • 950 DENIER 50' MIN. OR 4X CIRCUMFERENCE OF / INLET PROTECTION PER • 1200 HOURS UV RATING 2• SPECIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER ORIGINAL C.S. BMP HANDBOOK SE-5 GRAVEL BAG -'� LARGEST TIRE. WHICHEVER IS GREATERFEL GRADE • 1000MILKWHITE PER COLOR INLET PROTECTION PER V 2".m (See note 3)d stoke diameter tmeter —.�tII • 1000 PER BALE C.S. BMP HANDBOOK SE-5 Fabric (See note 8) q 24' q SECTION A-A STAPLE DETAIL END STAKE DETAIL {TOP VIEW) (SEE NOTE 9) B SECTION A—A FILTER FABRIC —14 2" x 2" 15' MIN. OR AS Silt ranee wood stake End stake ° REQUIRED TO N.T.S. CATCH BASIN fabric (See note 2) ACCOMMODATE kl � Stake ,' INLET GRAVELBAGGING (ELEVATION) INLET GRAVELBAGGING (PLAN) ANTICIPATED N.T.S. N.T.S. Fabri TRAFFIC, a WHICHEVER IS 3/4" GRAVEL Silt Ienc@ � ° C,tr_�n End stake GREATER. FILTER FABRIC ORIGINAL STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DETAIL 6" Toe ar slap B GRADE DETAIL A End take Sandbags(2-foyers high) PLAN VIEW CORRUGATED NTS END DETAIL OP110NAL MAINTENANCE OPENING DETAIL N.T.S. STEEL PANELS �� �\ /� PER BMP SE-10 SEE NOTE 11 NOTE: 12" MIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTES 1: SE-1 (SILT FENCE) CONSTRUCT CHAIN LINK FENCE SPECIFIED BY A SOILS ENGINEER 1. CONSTRUCT THE LENGTH OF EACH REACH SO THAT THE CHANGE OF THE STAKES SHALL BE SECURED WITH WIRE. MATCH EXISTING GRADE SECTION B—B IN BASE ELEVATION ALONG THE REACH DOES NOT EXCEED 3 THE N.T.S. HEIGHT OF THE LINEAR BARRIER, IN NO CASE SHALL THE REACH 8. FOR END STAKE, FENCE FABRIC SHALL BE FOLDED AROUND TWO LENGTH EXCEED 500'. STAKES ONE FULL TURN AND SECURED WITH 4 STAPLES. STABILIZED CONST. ENTRANCE 2. THE LAST 8'-0" OF FENCE SHALL BE TURNED UP SLOPE. 9• MINIMUM 4 STAPLES PER STAKE. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE `* NTS TYPICAL. PER BMP TC-1 3. STAKE DIMENSIONS ARE NOMINAL. 10. CROSS BARRIERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3 AND A MAXIMUM OF 3" MIN. OPENING 4. DIMENSION MAY VARY TO FIT FIELD CONDITION. 2 THE HEIGHT OF THE LINEAR BARRIER. BETWEEN BAGS 5. STAKES SHALL BE SPACED AT 8'-0" MAXIMUM AND SHALL BE 11. MAINTENANCE OPENINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN A MANNGER TOP ROW A POSITIONED ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF FENCE. TO ENSURE SEDIMENT REMAINS BEHIND SILT FENCE. 6. STAKES TO OVERLAP AND FENCE FABRIC TO FOLD AROUND EACH 12. JOINING SECTIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED AT SUMP LOCATIONS. N STAKE ONE FULL TURN. SECURE FABRIC TO STAKE WITH 4 STAPLES. 13. SANDBAG ROWS AND LAYERS SHALL BE OFFSET TO ELIMINATE i_iTl_TI_ITI_ITI_i GAPS. ll-I-1iI-1i1=1i=i L-1i-1iI-iI-il-i - _ 7. STAKES SHALL BE DRIVEN TIGHTLY TOGETHER TO PREVENT -��� ��� ��� ��� ���- -��� ��� ��� ��� ���- -ICI=I��=I�-ICI=ICI= POTENTIAL FLOW-THROUGH OF SEDIMENT AT JOINT. THE TOPS SECTION A-A (�)SILT GRAVEL BAGS STACKED FENCE DETAILS SE-1 A NTS GR70S�CALE � V G DETAILS 3 LAYERS HIGH PER BMP SE-1 2 LINE BOTTOM OF PIT NOT AND COVER STRAW BALES LINE BOTTOM OF PIT PORTABLE, WATERTIGHT WITH PLASTIC SHEETING WITH PLASTIC SHEETINj4R BIN BY CONCRETE YSTEMS, INC. (OR EQUAL) Prior to obtaining a permit for clearing and grubbing, stockpile, or rough grading, the applicant shall install a dust Iv°I(� Ili; 1V°`ti ,l' '�i�� I�'`' ,I' ' i control sign on the property as indicated below. After installation of si na e, inspection will be required. If you �_ /.'�/i� °ft�li I�/i fly ASHOUT SYSTEMS, INC. 9 p P Y 9 9 P q Y -WASHOUT have any questions, please contact Michael Frasure "Department Inspection Supervisor•' at (909) 477-2710 ext. 4217. GENERAL INFORMATION STRAW BALES 1) Sign thickness should be 5/8 or 3/4 inch CDX laminated plywood board, overall size of 48"x96'• (4 feet by STAKED WITH TWO OPTION 2 OPTION 3 8 feet). STAKES PER BALE 2) Signage must be located within 50 feet of each project site entrance. OPTION 1 THE CONTRACTOR MAY 3) One sign is sufficient for multiple site entrances located within 300 yards of each other. USE ANY OF THESE 3 OPTIONS. 4) Text height shall be at a minimum as shown on right side of sign template below. 5) Sign background must contrast with lettering. Typically, black text with white background. 6) The lower edge of the board must be a minimum of 6 feet and a maximum of 7 feet above grade. 7) The telephone number listed for the contact must be a local or a toll-free number and shall be accessible (�)W�ASWOUT PITS 24 hours per day. NTS EXAMPLE OF SIGNAGE SIGNAGE INFORMATION LETTERING SIZE Empty Space 3" Developers Name 4" Project Name/Tract#W 4" IF YOU SEE DUST COMING FROM 4" THIS PROJECT CALL: 4" Name, Phone Number 6" If you do not receive a response, please call 3" The A MD at 1-800-CUT-SMOG 3" Empty Space 3" 96" EMAAR ENTERPRISES TRACT NO. 19977 48" IF YOU SEE DUST COMING FROM CITY THIS PROJECT CALL: DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: SHAREEF AI/VAD 909-519 1355 If you do not receive a response,please call The AQMD at I-80U-CUT-SMOG CITY OF RANCHO C U CA M O N G A IF PRECISE GRADING PLANS TRACT NO. 19917 W mIn to 7'max from the finished grade EROSION CONTROL PLAN Embedded into the ground or placed on a o QROF ESS/pN9l DESIGN RECOMMENDED AU DAV I D E VA N S Q m ANDASSOCIATES INC. DUST CONTROL SIGN DETAILS � No.$7222 M DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 0 SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 8 OF 17 s� CIV I�- �Q' qTF OF CAI�F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12/09/2020 FILE NO D I n ❑ O I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 00 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L/ ® I 0 ' ii ii i I N I I I d d i l i l i I I I II I I I I I i i i i i i i i CO N II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 00 Oo - N Cn 0- Fr I IIF J ao I I I Ui � I i I I r W ® / N I I II II II I co C all, — — a I N II II II I I I JLJLJ: ! I w I ® ® I DD CID L U) 0 I I I I I I I I IIIIIIII d d i i i ii ii I � I <G W I I I � I II jI 00 I- J co I N I I N I ❑D F=__ _ __ __ _ �G W ----------------------------------- ------ -- ---_----_--__-_- ------------- -- -- - -- - -- -- i------------------------------------------------ - - 1_ '-------------- - ' -- - ------ , -------------------------' ------- ------------- -- - i------------------------i -----____ ___ _ _ ------------------------ ---------------- '---------------- -------' -------- ----------------- I— ------- '------- -- — - ------------- Jill r d N N a li ii II 8'SS 8"SS 8" S 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"S 8"SS 8'SS I \ All d I \ ----- ---------- IIII------ ----------- 01 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W 8W \ ------' � U) imp- .Z7 O V �— \ Z 4 i - - - - -LQ � J 0 U1 N 30 0 30 60 Elevations Table scale 1"= 30' feet NUMBER MINIMUM MAXIMUM AREA COLOR ELEVATION ELEVATION 1 —7.54 —4.00 11,920.51 DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY APPROVED: 2 —4.00 —3.00 10,321.48 ■ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 3 —3.00 —2.00 18,984.36 � 4 -2.00 -1.00 43,490.43 PRECISE GRADING PLANS 5 -1.00 0.00 52,965.97 TRACT NO. 19917 6 0.00 1.00 59,290.28 ■ 7 1.00 2.00 36,801.77 CUT/FILL M A P 8 2.00 3.00 20,318.79 ■ 9 3.00 4.00 12,445. 13 ■ Q�OFESS/pN 10 2.78 8.71 61,369.47 �� ql DESIGN RECOMMENDED ``' `` Fx �c AU DAVID EVANS Q Q �, � F cD m ANDASSOCIATES INC. LU No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 9 OF 17 qTF OF CpO CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12/09/2020 FILE NO KEYNOTE: Ql A.C. PAVING OVER AGGREGATE BASE 14 UNDERGROUND INFILTRATION SYSTEM (STORMTECH) 2 6" CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY STANDARD WILSON AVE. 3 DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD. 101 COBBLE STONE HARDSCAPE AT PARKWAY TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 19917 4 SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARD © 3 FEET HIGH MASONRY WALL WITH 3 FEET WROUGHT IRON ON TOP BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PORTION OF SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 27, i i W 5 PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN 8 TOWNSHIP 1 NORTH, RANGE 6 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA SHEET INDEX PROPOSED 8" SEWER MAIN Q Q 7 PROPOSED 24 STORM DRAIN o BANYAN STREET o �� SHEET 1 = TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SHEET 2 = CONCEPTUAL GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN Q ti a i W ® 1 WATER SERVICE PER CCWD STANDARD APPLICANT/O"E6R/ EVELOPER: SHEET 3 = CROSS-SECTIONS GYPSUM SHAREEF AWAD SHEET 4 = CUT AND FILL EXHIBIT 1 DR. 9 4" SEWER LATERAL 1 6' BLOCK WALL DIAR, LLC, AND CASTLE DEVELOPMENT, INC. C`'''`'''111' FREEWAY 210 EASEMENT NOTES ''° '' � SHEET 5 = PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 15' PRIVATE FEEDER TRAIL 1231 N. CACTUS AVENUE, STE. D SITE AND DRAINAGE PLAN NO VTY MMP 8 6' WIDE CATCH BASIN PER CITY STANDARD RIALTO, CA. 92376 (909) 519-1355 01 15' WIDE PRIVATE FEEDER TRAIL EASEMENT SHEET 6 -- UTILIZATIOM MAP © 8' HIGH BLOCKWALL (SOUND WALL) TO BE MAINTAIN BY HOA 2 WALL MATERIALS, COLOR, AND FINISH TO MATCH TR. 18122 TO THE WEST 5' WIDE PRIVATE DRAINAGE EASEMENT 1 1 O CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE TO BE COORDINATED WITH CALTRANS O3 8 WIDE ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY TRAIL EASEMENT SCALE. 1`40' I I I I l I I vI I a� --- bd I r----�•-� � � , L------ I /I ---J -----� / z `-- I r-• I r-- I s T I L D f 54 A r---� I A Z �, Q - -_ - _ _--- I �� � °fit API: 0225 032 17 O n, ,� ,^.� L, �" L--- 1IJ2 J 69/9 6 J fTI i APN. 0225-085-08 PAD-1409.2 ����II IIIIII 111nnu1111111 1 h � --- GD EXIST_ IN-�G 1 SIN^^ � � � GLE AMIr��. Y ---------------------- -----------------------0 0- 1�iJ.B 66-g 0� = 0 1i� - �--•1 U� `APN: 225-0 PP 9 0220��-_�Q APN: 0225-062 APN: 0225-Ot2-03 62- 4 . PAD-1 43.4 APN: 0225-06?- 2 AD=1427.1aAP S 8&0 PAD_142 .5 P2 PAD=14144 PAD-1416.J c Q ------ --------- - --- J-I- -------3-------------�----- - -- 3� ^� 11 .� -----. - -- - -- N N to N - + IN A I � I 11 .� ,� > II I _��— - _ —_ «_- - -- �-._ - - - - - - I It O v; �.. �?jll' W S I I 11 p Ilrj 1 I 1� I< - — ��— .- c n i�i. .. `-`- `-�� EXIST. LOCK WALLOPER Th 18122 0 9 I; i i i I �s • RAINDROP I. I� EMAIN 'V I 11 ..... . .� �1 j!1 TO REMAIN' �` 229' 7/0 ! . PLACE ro O REMAIN r a W os 98.7' 2 92 98.' 6 . . . _� I \ I ®�-�ma-���-mamma-ao�� 2 1 G ---- m --=--® �� o �,'tea, 16 '` �. A �G ....... �,'r'6, A 1 16 I I I I I I =-- O ❑ v--- ��--- cT �I 19' "�N. �� I. �- v>W r \ \W c�Q 107� Lj s I �L'... '. ' � � II I I 14 . . p ....:. . N C RAL Q N RR L CORRAL Q CJfVF% c7.. 30, --- GA 8 ,�. ... . . - - - �` �'. W L J JLOT r N s 48 \ 48 48 \. . . . -- ------ LOT 8 I Q h r I • � � �I .5.. . O •J 19, � 0p + I r I 7y,.' e} 1 - o PAD-1407.3 �:oz. '.'.'.: �, N :'. .. o. . ' . .':':'.. .:.:.:. . . PA,D=1420.2 tdP _ I I 3 I I --� _' :: ... ------ ----- I . ... . . .. . � N ICI I ' �• .� l Er- 0 lao J, 30 9 N s� `v 70 { I I I ---i I _I G G GRADE' L EI• GRADE BREAK LINE sr — 9 4 LINE C•,� — GRADE R,,",� LINE �' GRADE BREAK LINE I r >I l_ - - - ,-- - r -r -- - - ,\ - - - - — — - --- - - - r 1 �; ��_ �� � � � �8 �� 12 2; S � I I EXISTING i I EXISTING I I 1% MIN. 1 ACCESS rci, _ .. N 19e MIN, ? i � III i I I I�,_ _ - — _ SINGLE FAMILY I I SINGLE FAMILY _c� �' G� F L— GATE t I 1 3 I rn� � � l • ��' .'�'.'...�CG i 1 � .. � � I I r I I r = 212.7 - S C i l~ 0 7 ��` � p _ h' G •:,i .. >` 4�� � \ 11. I � N � �� 29 I � I I 6 �?`' p �/ ' �5,0\ N ' LI .'. . . N 1% MlN 12' 114 , 4 I I 1 70 ---------------I I I 1------ . o ----� o I ......... 3 ,�-. {{ a I o � ....... . . .. ... .: � ..I �: :: �: :��. .. . . . . . . . . . . .. LOT 2 .. . � . .. . . . ... .... . . I z _. . . . . . .. . .. .. . •..� � �� o r (:—z z , o� �.� I �f Q ��� PAD-1 6 8' ;1a'• D �� z t�: . ..'.1.8�'. FAD=141�,9 I I I I t \ I 1 I 1 LOT �� � , o -� '�'• '• •� �• � •• L T 7 LOT �e LOT 4 . . . . . .. , I 1 I ' I •'• 3 ' . :.;::j S' P 1409.1 _ PAD=1417.1 J o i o I 102' 0 30 3n PAD 1412.0 1 1 2 ;� . . .. .'130�: 130' gg ( ;97 10' I I ' � � � � I�'I ati- Q o g �P I .g ��, c� 4 �' L `l- I `� - c9 0 l � I I I.N r 14 I o 8Y O `z 9 ( O � 19' MIN.'' 1 � I 1 ' CESS. � •.••• •• ••• . . . . . . . . ACCES l � h •� 8• �I� co �n I •o W T G 't� GATE •�2•. . . . . .. . G� GAT � 1' 9 0 I •.•.'.. Acc€ss 210.52 � ',, 6g '.• : i . . .:... . '. . . .. .. .. ... �p 226' � ACGEss � � ..... .. . . . .. . GA1•E o r FG , 8 .. . .�.�.�. . ..' �..;. ::' c,IJ'.'L'.' .�. 0 p U I > �u o� 1.� MINI, N 1. 4;.. .. . ...... .. .'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' t� .. N 7Z, MIN. I / .� r , 6' ..... N ice. '. . . If — \ I 1 J I J�,I/�0 �I � •� � � r � ' rh . . T�7 •�•o.'. ���G� 32 I It APN: 0226- 622-07L Its O 34 _ ^j 18 I 0 90 14 '• � — — 1q I 14' �r I I t cs'� - � o I ti . . . . . �P 1. .4 . 6' .'I': . . . .. . . . . 0 0 i? L J �, T L —J J-/ -� LOT :U:'�.' L 10 . . ..� �. ....�. 83 92 �� . . . . s2' � .. 8,;.� . . . . . . . .. . J .. LET 3 I 1 I O �.�. . 1241\ .r. D • • - . .. . � AD 1418.9 :'7.3. .. �+ '.. 103 Pp.O 1409.0 T.... 3 4 .3.. / o d M T 8 8 8 - V I _ 8 -r�L-. .�ti--'.'. r 1 bdii. ti �. '�. Y — ..... . .. . .. . .. .. . . . ... ...... . . . . .... . . . . . 'J . . . .. . . . .... .. ..... 7 9 `L' 9 �. g 2.299. '.' 9. \. \ w o l � ....... .. . . .. ... ... . . . . . . .. ........ . .. . . . .:' . . THE . .'.�,►.'.. . .. . :'I'•' ...... . . . .. ... ... J I o c F I �. v 17 F • — — �jj I I .. °� 2 �'' - ��, > 19 MIN. '� 4 . . .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . . -- ,� \ . .'.; . . . ...'.'..'.'.'. . . . . .. . . .4. . . . .... .. . . :. . . . .. . . . .. . . . . :... .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . .. ... . . . . . . .. . . .. . . ... . . :. ... . .. . . . .. . . . . T. COMMUNITY TRAIL 7 - - _� o S a r. - - - GO — - - - -- 0�� L LCA, TION. SAN BERINARDIN�" COUNT), A , _LEGEND FLOOD ''CONT40L DISTRICT ALL THAT i CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY PING WITHIN THIF SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE s�UTHWEST\ONE-QUARTER�OF SECTION 7, TO 1 SOUTH, RANGE C WEST, SAN ERNARDINO v L) _l - � ° =� MERIDIAN,y AS CONVEYED TO THE STA. E OF U'.ALIFORN�: , PURSUANT TO,��-A- RANT DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 12, 1995, vIAS DOCUME' T NO. 19950J52692 OF OFFIC,�AL RECORDS, AN BERNARDINO z TC TOP OF CURB N COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFrCE STATE F CALIFv?NIA. ----- ll I FL - \ LOWLINE _- o EXCEPTING I17HEREFROM, THAT `PORTIO LYING SOc.THERL> OF T�;E"FOLLOW,, G DES RIBED LINE.•\ NG = IV TURAL GRO!. D y �- `� I �I ��' _ BEGINNING AT POINT ON THE WEST L, E OF SAID SECTION 27, DISTANT N;"JRTH 0 QO 58 WEST,- 60.02 FEET FROM THE NORTHWES( CORNER ,OF THAT CERTAIN ,�dRCEL CONVEYS `TO THE STATE o o w d W - WATERLINE - _t -- -- , ,o CALIFORNIA, PURSUANT TO A GRANT DEED\�RECORDED SEP1Bv►I E , 24, 1974 IN BOOK 85,QZ PAGE �4 ET SEQ OF SAIL, OFFICIAL RECORDS, THENCE NORTH 88�4428 EAST 331. . 5 FEET, TO A III' �FH = FIRE HYDRANT OINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE --WEST ONE-.-ALF OF SAID SOUTHWEST OtYE-QUARTER 0%- THE SOUTHWEST G. E-QUARTER;-..DISTANT NORTH 0.00y,'44" WEST 60. 14 FEET FROM THE ORTHEAST h T�=�QP OF GRATE ORNER�.O-F SAID PARCE4. S = SEWS LINE " PP �� C&G = CUk AND GUTT' R f L = FINISH GRADE o A jp CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �, ,A FF� FlNISHE�9sFL00R E t v! TION o �s QROFEsslo N I' ,��I�� GF = GARAGE FLO ELEVATI N �_� _ z CONCEPTUAL GRADING/DRAINAGE PLAN I � �' - .. = t✓�CENTERLINE _ \ - _HP ��HIGH POI�i`�T -- No. 37037 o � ' - PCC - PORiLA;'!n CEMEiv`z,C ETE it Exp 6-30-16 SUBTTM 19917 — ��� �_ _ ` APN: 0226-102-30 Q l; EXISTING IMf ERVIOUS AREA - 0 S.F. `�y 0/v I TOTAL �\ �� R TOTAL NEW IMPER,'✓IOUS AREA = 111,059 S.F. �Cr C \ APPROVED BY DATE: TOTAL�REMOVAL Ai�D REPLACEMENT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0 S.F.� CITY ENGINEER RCE No. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK DESIGN HCP HP ENGINEERING, INC. RECOMMENDED BENCH MARK: (RAW QUANTITIES) 1465 CRESTVIEW ROAD BENCH MARK NO. 50 CUT = 13,300 C.Y. DRAWN REDLANDS, CA. 92374 SHEET CHISELED "X" IN THE MIDDLE OF CONCRETE FILL = 18,200 C.Y. CAD (909)799-6797 Fax (909)799-1508 HEADWALL AT THE SOUTHWEST COR. SUMMIT AVE. IMPORT = 4,900 C.Y. 2 OF 6 AND EAST AVENUE CHECKED DRAWING N6. ELEVATION. 1507.007 NO. DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY HENRY C. POQUIZ, R.C.E. 37037 APPROVED DATE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 10 17 Project#. S11BTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Project#: SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC201.8-00566 Project SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023; DPC20f'640566 Conditions; of,`Approval ,, Project Name: Tract 19917 Project Name Tract 19917 Project Name: Tract 19917 Location:; 022610230-0000 Location: - 022610230-0000 Location: - 022610230-0000 R""�' ' ` Community v Project Tom: Tentative Tract-:-Map CEQA Review, Variance Project'Type: Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review Variance Project Type: Tentative Ttiact Map CEQA Review,�il', ~} - v._ CIiCAMONr;� -.- _ _ _ un'ty Development Department _ - Y Project#: $UBTT199'17 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 ALL OF"THE F( LLOIMN i CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:' ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Project Name Tract 19917 Plannin-a DepartMellit Plannins>1.Oapartment Planning Department Location: - 022610230-OWO Standard Conditions of A val Standard Conditions of A PPro Standard d ndillions of Approval Approval Project Type: Tentative TractiMap CEQAReview. Variance 8. All private _slopes in excess of 5 feet; but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2.1 or realer 19. The Covenants Conditions, 27. Where comer side, interior side or rear aril roe lines r '9 9 _ . and Restrictions (CC�Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Y property rtY are adjacent to local equestrian trails, slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Plannin ' and EngineeringService$ construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face' follows. one; 15-gallon or larger size tree per leach- f50 s I - i a double ' ` ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: 9 9 P q ft of slope area, 1 gallon or larger size, Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior sided block, slump stone or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review shrub.,per each 1 OU sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in to the issuance of BuildingPermits, whichever occurs first. A recorded co shall be Committee:- copy provided to the Planning Department - .. . .:excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 21 or greater slope shall also include one .5�-gallon or larger City En ineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit `to `the Planning Department28. For sin single-family res[d` Ktral development i N __ ..g . , g a list of the _9 y e P w thtn .ilhe Equestrian/Rural Overlay Distract, at ,least one Standard Conditions of Approval size tree 'per each 250 sq. ft. of slope. area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters name 'and address of their officers on or before January1 of each an model home shall be provided with a constructed -: w. d every year and whenever p 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropnateencing. 1. For all residential develo`ment rovide, conduit from each unit/lot and a pull, box to connect to to soften and vary slope plane. , Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent said information h n p P . P the Pcages. 29. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence :until, such time as all California Building Code and street. Provide interior structured 'tin for each house/building with minimum Category 5 btrigation system to be installed by the.developer prior to occupancy. w!-__ 9 9 9 ry �PPer 20. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all' lots State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to y .occupant plans shall be wire, Radio Grade 6 coaxial cable, and a central distribution panel, prior to release of occupancy S ,€,!fees shall be planted in areas of ublic view adjacent to Arid aeon struct r t a r P p cy public 1 d g u es a ate of ,one flee for Planning Director- and 'Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safe Services fiber-to-the .buildin FTTB Plans shall be submitted for Planning Director and Building iDfficial per 30 linear feet of building-, ty ( 9, ?:• 9 9 nQ public notice requirements„ special street posting; :phone listing for community concerns, hours of bep2ittment, to show compliance. The buildings shall be ins review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits, 9 petted for compliance and final PP P 9 10. All walls shall be provided' with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance area , tie construction act[vlty, dust control measures, and securityfencing. acceptance,granted prior to occupancy. 2. For sin le-farnil . residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall b design shall be coordinated it h i 9 y P p P g g e continuously g d Hated with the Engineering Services Department. 21. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by- 48-foot corral area in the rear yard ad acent to the :Local 30. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated maintained in a h and, thriving condition hLandscaping � _ _ r 1 P d Hated fo heap y rig co ton by the developer until each individual unit is sold' and 11. and im anon shall be designed to conserve water throw Feeder Trail. Grade, access from corral to trail with a m consistency prior t issuance f 9 9 gh the pllnclbles ..t�f water maximum slope of 5.1 and a minimum width of cy P o., s ce o any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, occupied by the_ buyer. Prior to ,releasing occupancy, for those units, an inspection shallt be efficient landscaping per Development'Code Chapterl7.82 1'0 feet etc.) or prior to final/ map' approval in the case, of a cu o lot .subdivision sat m . of approved use has conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 12 The applicant shall r commenced, whichevi3 ' nes first pp contact the U.S Postal Service to determine the appropriate type and location of Z2 The site Shall, be developed and maintained m accordance with the approved plans which include 3. Front yard and corner side and landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development •Y .�_ P 9 ..9 q P P mailboxes. ,Multi-fame ��r.sidential developments shall Site PlanBi architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors. landscaping, sin ro ram n 31. Six-foot decorative blo�� walls shall be constructed: aloe h - �'�� -- - ty e p provide a sold overhead structure for g p g , a d g the project perimeter, if a double walk Code and/or Etiwanda S ecifiG Plan. This re uirertteni shall be in addition to the re uired street P q mailboxes with adequate fighting. The final location of the mailboxes and the design of the grad on file .In the Planning Department, the conditions_ contained herein, the Development Code condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining 1 9 `tries and slope planting;, overhead structure shall. be subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of regulations and the Etiwanta Specific Plan. property owners to pr,6vide a single wall., Developer shall notify ail all P ty b y m_-. contiguous property 4. .A 'detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope_ planting and model -home landscaping in Building Permits: 23. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. T owners at least 30 days priorto the removal of any,existing walls/fences along the ro ect perimeter, The p 1 the case of residential development, shall be prepared b" a licensed landscape architect a i P P P Y p and 13. The Covenants, Condfions and Restrictions shall restrict the storage of recreational vehicles on this 5-foot -wall/fence setback and the parkway shall, have landscape and irrigation :�Irf addition to the 32. For residential development, Tatum walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonr y. submitted ,for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the site unless they are the principal source of transportation for the owner and prohibit parkin on required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning 9 33. Revised Site Plans and building elevations incorporating all' Conditions of Approval shall be development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development interior circulation aisles other than designated visitor parking areas. Director review and approval prior to 'issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by 14. All units shall b includrn trees, shrubs, round .covers and irri anon shall be maintained b p 9 submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. e provided with: garage door openers if driveways are less than 18.feet in depfta from 9 9 9 y the property owner. The 34. Slope fencing along side property lines may be wrought firbn° or black plastic coated chain link to Fire Construction Services. back of sidewalk. y developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the' P Y parkway maintenance re ttiremeM, in a standard °Ijplat as determined b the Plannin it r r maintain an open feeling,and enhance views. 5. Landscaping and irrigatiorti systems required to be installed within_ the public right-of-way on the 15. Access- gates to the rear Ards shall ;be constructed from a material q Y g D ecto , pro to accepting a cash Y _ ,more durable Than v�ood: gates. • . ,._ peri0eter of this project arectahalll be continuously maintained by the developer. Acceptable a deposit ox1 any property. 35. Solar access easements shall be dedicated for the purpose of assur�siri that each lot or dwellrn ble materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 6. T final design f the r r _ -- unit ,:hall have the right to receive sunlight 11e g o e p66"te parkways, walls, landscaping, and sidewalks shall be included In 16. A roval --of, i r - - 24_All IparkWays, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained b the, Property owner. s 9 across adjacent lots or ut5ds for use of a solar energy ppthis request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the .Development Code, all Y p �� the required landscape plans and shall be subject to PlanningDirector review and approval and homeowners' association or other means act system. The easements may be contained in, a Declaration of Restrictions for the subdivision acceptable to the. City. Proof of this landscape son which PP other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in shall be recorded concurrently coordinated for consistency with any parkway' landscaping plan which may be required by the e af maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review with the recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, effect `the time of Building Permit issuance. hi wchever comes first. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. _ Engineering Services Department. 17. Construct block walls between homes i.e., aloe interior side and rear 7. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical,height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 ( 9 property lines)• rather than 25. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also rovide access for structures, fixtures, or,any other object; except for utility wires and similar objects. P wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. P o service vehicles, such as veterinarians or 36. Street names shall be submitted,shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum- drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that b etted for Planning Director review and approval ;in accordance, With the 18. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the egwne a uestrian access is maintained throw h, ste -thr adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map P planting 9 Y irrigation y g p oughs, 'in accordance with Engineering Services Control. toe lantin required b this sectipn shall include a permanent irri ation system, to be animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of-�sald animals have been met... �fia ivtdual lot q � � - pipe by the developer prior to occupancy. n in Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 3.7. For single-family residential development, a 2-inch galvanized pipe shall be attached to each ars subdivisions shall have .the option of keeping said animals without the n support for I necessity of 26. Local .Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0:5 ' - ` . � aappo- post o al wood fences, with a minimum of tvvo 1/2-inch la bolts to with 9 percent at the downstream end of a trail for :a 9 stand high winds. �ap�ealing to boarft of,directors of homeo rs'associations for amendments to the;CCSFts. , ,_ - - distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail defies from reaching the street• Both post ,and pipe shall be installed in an 18-inch deep concrete "footing. Pipe shall 'extend at least Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official A feet, 6 inches above grade. www CityofRC u5 www.cityofRc;us -• �,citYoi�c�� wHrw.CiEyotRCus, [il tlfC�i� lZQts Panted,7�30/201 e (?anted-7/3or2p18 ;Faye 2'ot 1� Printed:"7/30/2015 p e<of itk _ F�e3 ofll>t �. Project#: SUBTT19517 CEOA2014-00023; DRC201.8-00566 Project SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC2018-00566 Pilp ct=#: SUBTT19917 CEQA20.14-00023, DRC2018-00566 `Project Name: Tract 19917 Project Name: Tract 19917 1foj -,Name- Tract 19917 Location - 022610230-0000 Location: - 0226102300000 !Cocetfon: - 022610230-0000. Project Type Tentative Tract Ma CEQA Review, Variance Protect Type: Tentative Tract Ma `C (lA Review;Variance injectType: Tentative Tract Map.CEQA Review. Variance 1 YP P 1 YP P ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOV�-0010177ONSAPPL.Y`TO YOUR'PROJECT: ALL DFTHE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT_ PlannniA Qepartmen , Planning Department Engineer'm`st Services Department Standard Condlfions of Approval';, Standard Coitoltions of.Approval Please be advised of the following Special ConditlOns 46. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning 4. The catch basins in Copley Drive need to 'be :at the sump location. The 2 catch basins with 2 38. A detailed 'plan indicating 'trail widths, maximum slopes, physical' conditions, fencing; and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 aaterals shall be designed to handle Q100. review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of years from the date of the approval. street 'improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including a,.` Revise Drawing 2356-D to show how this 100-foot extension will connect to the existing storm fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. drain. Engineering Services Department P-t�blic improvement lens shall be 90 percent complete 39. Wood fencing shall be treated with stain, paint, or watersealanti, - 5 P P P p prior to issuance of Grading Permits. Public /Please be advised of the foQa ving Special Conditions improvement plans shall be >00 percent complete; signed -by the CityEn ipaer and an improvement -40. The applicant shall submit certification from an acoustical engineer that all retorfimletdations of the 1�. Copley Drive„ 'Wilshire Drive and Street. A are to be improved_ in accordance with C' 'Local dY agrsertient.and bonds executed by the developer, prior to building permit issuance: acoustical report were implemented in construction, including measurements of ;interior and exterior Street" standards including: 6 LA permit from the San.Berra '"trio Count Flood Con i \ i rd_ ty trot D str ct is required for work within'its/ noise levels to document compliance with City standards. Certification shall be submitted to the right-of-way_ Building and Safety Services Department and the Planning Department prior to final occupancy a. Local streets per Etiwanda Specific Plan shall have a 60-foot right-of-way with sidewalks irelease of the affected homes: on both sides. 7. Comer property line cutoffs at Wilshire Driveand Street"A"and°'Copley drive and Street "A"'A4(l 'be:dedicated per City Standards. 41. A final acoustical` report shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the - 8 Tract 1765,1 has partially installed the ' ommuni issuance of Building Permits. The final report shall discuss the level of interior noise attenuation,°to b= Provlcte ! 4Eitter, drive approaches street pavement; 3 curb cores oil-each; ,tQt aid curbside P Y '-Community Trail, south of Lot 7 of Tract '17651: This ;blow 45 CNEL, the building materials and construction techniques provided, and if a ro riete afn a existing trail is 15 feet wide and this _ _ P P P _i. y � _ . outlets er S 107-8 for private trail(draln_ t ; xjeveloper shall dedicate catetancadd additional 5 feet o complete a standard 20-.foot interior commune trail. Verify the adequacy of the mitigation measures. The building plans will be checked 'for conformance p P ry ti with the mitigation measures contained in the final report. c. Lot driveway off Street "A" shall be installed'as far south as possible. a= Revise City Drawing 221:9Sifeef 14A, plfoPared for Tract 17651 to show the 42., Mitigation measures are required for the project. The applicant is responsible for the cast of reconstruction of the community trail. implementing said, measures, including monitoring and reporting. Applicant shall be required to post d, Provide 5800 Lumen NPSV or LED equivalent street lights. cash, letter of credit, or other forms of guarantee acceptable to the Planning Director in the amount b. If lots 2 and 3 will be taking direct access to the corrittfiunity trail„provide,single of $729 prior to the issuance of Building Permits, guaranteeing satisfactory performance and completion of all mitigation measures. These furies may be used by the City to retain consultants a• Provide street, trees, a � ninimum Of: 15-gallon size, of. a species and spaced per Standard gates per Standard Drawing 1008. Conditions of Approval. p g all 'actions required b the approved environmental documents to ,complete- y �. :Provide "Step,through"forlocal trail access to the community trail per Standard and/or pay for City staff- time to monitor and report on the 'mitigation measures. Failure q Y pp- l ocu shall be considered grounds iQr' f. Install curb adjacent sidewalk on east side of Street "A". Said sidewalk to start from tPfeydrive Drawing 1007-B. forfeit: approach southeiiy wing'of Lot 10 on Copley Drive to the drive approach southerly wing of Lot 3 9. Tract 18122 is Curren u►ldergroundin 'existing, overhead utilities' their project side of Foothill 9 9 on eir 43. The applicant shall agree to defend at his "sole expense any action brought against the City; its an. Freeway (SR-210)'; along FCD access road to San Sevaine basin outlet including, the power pole agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to " 9 P Wilshire Drive. The parkway on Street"A between the sidewalk and will should be filled vvfth east of your westerly boundary. The developer of Tract 18122 is eligible for reimbursement to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, cobble per Standard Drawing 542, Case 1. Work around existing sewer manholes as needed. recover the proportionate cost of the urtdergrounding from your westerly project boundary to the 'for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be location of the first power pole easterly.• The fair share amount has not been determined at this time DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, .at its sole_ discretion; participate g. Provide traffic signing and striping as required: since a Reimbursement Agreement has not been processed yet. APPROVED: at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve . Vehicular,access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets only. applicant of his obligations under this condition. 2. Vehicul- Standard conditions of Approval CITY OF RANCHO C U CA M O N G A 44. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of a. Where private local trail gradients exceed 4 percent, water bars, splash curbs or other 1`0. A signed consent and waiver form to appropriate p P 9 P P join': and/or` form the a ro riate Landsca a and Lighting Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size), The sheets diversionary devices shall be used. Where a downstream end of a trail meets a street; the Districts shall be filed with the En PRECISE GRADING PLANS gineedng Services Department prior to 'final map approval or are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading_ activities and are not trail shall be graded at no more than 0.5 percent for a distance of 25 feet from the issuance .of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Fo i n costs shall be borne required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. - 5� t.9,_.. ne by the TRACT N O. 19917 right-of-way line to prohibit the deposit of trail surface debris onto the sidewalk/street. developer. 45. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department :of Fish and Wildlife 'Notice of Provide curbside drain outlets for adjacent drainage devices. 11. A non-refundable deposit shall. be paid to e City, covering the estima ted operating costs for all Exemption;and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,330.75. All checks are to be: 1,, The existing overhead utilities -(telecommunications and electrical except for the 66kV electrical new streetlights for the first six months .of o rah n prior ,made payable, to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission P ) _pe 0. p to final map approval or prior to Building CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL shall be undergrounded on the project side of Foothill Freeway (SR-210), along FC.D access road to Permit issuance if no map.is involved. Secretary,prior to public hearing San Sevaine basin outlet, extending to the first poles off-site (east and VeOt. prior to public, N improvement acceptanoe,,or occupancy, whichever occurs first. www c�,y ,r c.us www.CityofRC.us www,CltyOlRc:us l'il 7 ei$.„Zlst31 t1 i ; Pageis of t8 !PMtad 713012018 P"o 6 of 10 Phkrted 7130120f8 oe a 9 Q�oFESS/0N DESIGN RECOMMENDED Co 9 �% AU DAVID EVANS Q CD m ANDASSOCIATES INC. rn No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET * * Ontario California 91764 11 OF 17 J� OIV I\- �Q' q�F OF A`\F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE NO I I- ` #: Project #: SUBTT1991,7 CE A2014- 0 - Project#: SUBTT19917 CEQA20-14-0002 D 1 - Pro ect#t SUBTT19917 CEO 1 `- Pioect _ SUBTT19917 CEQA207400023, DRC2018-00566 1 Q 0 023, DRC2018 00566 1 _ 3, RC20 8 00566 1 QA20 4 001�26 DRC i;B-i tf_66$ `hroject`Name Tract 19917 Project Name: Tract 19917 Project Name: Tract 19917 Project Name: Tract.19917 avocation.- 022610230-0000, - Location' - 022610230-0000 Location. 022610230-0000 Location` 0226,10230-0000 V P - T T n` " ... Project Type: Tentative Tract M CEQA 'Project e. Tentative Tract`Ma CE R Pro e t T Tentative ~` a - Pito ect'.�'_ e:t yp Tentative.Tract M'>�p CEQA Review, Variance : : 1 yP Map C Q Review. VarianceType: Map_CEQA eview,`Variance 1 c Type:, a U.y4�,ract Map CEQA Review, Variance. ALL OF THE FOLLO . NG C NDITI ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CON I ALL H ALL OF THEFOLLOIN/NG CONDITIONS APPL`YTQ YOUR PROJECT Wn. O ONS PPLY T YOUR PROJECT. D LIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. aFT E F0416 /NG CONDITIONS APPLY;TO Y.OUR,PROJECT. Engineering Services Department Engineering Services Department Engineering Services Department nglneering Services Deparlbment Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, a Diversion Deposit ;and related administrative fees shall 17, Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: 19. Improvement Plans and Construction: 21 Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion program. The deposit is fully refundable If at a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page ,of the street improvement least 50% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and Wilshire Drive future signal poles, and traffic signal plans, shall be prepared; by a. registered Civil Engineer and shall plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: appropriate documentation is provided to the City, Permits issued on .or after June 2, 2014, must Curb & Gutter be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer, Security shall be posted and an agreement "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where complete 'the reimbursement process through the City's Accelerate online portal within 60 days A.C. Pavement executed to the satisfaction of the :City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas. shall be per the public following the completion of the construction and/or demolition project or the` deposit will be forfeited. Sidewalk the public and/or private street improvements, prior to: final map approval or the issuance of Building. landscape improvement,plans. Permits issued before June 2, 2014, require the following when applying for a deposit Drive Approach Permits, whichever occurs first. ' reimbursement. a completed CD-2 form, a copy of the cashier's receipt showing the deposit Street Lights b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction Copley Drive amount, and all weight tickets. Instructions and forms are available at the City's web site, Street Trees permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits Botanical Name - Chitalpa tashkentensis www.CityofRC.us, under City Hall; Engineering; Environmental Programs. 18. Construct the following required. Common Name Chitalpa .perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Min. Grow Space = 3' 13. Dedication shall be made of the followingrights-of-way on the c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and P g. y perimeter streets (measured from interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, Spacing 50' O.C. street centerline:): Street;"A" ty g� 9 - d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with an new construction or reconstruction Size - 15 Gallon Curb & Gutter 9 P y $0 totsil feet on Copley Drive A.C. Pavement project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic ,signals and 60 total feet on Wilshire Drive Sidewalk interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, Construction Notes for Street Trees: 60 total feet on Street"A" Drive Approach. ECR, or any other,locations approved by the City Engineer. 1) All street trees are to be planted�in accordance with City standard plans. Notes: 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, .an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the Street Lights - � . . 1.4. All existing easements lying within future rights-of-way shall be qwt-claimed or delirteated: :de e 1 Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at in intersections n City inspector. An unusual o r n final map.- Street Trees ) t sectio s and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of '200 feet apart,. tY P Y t �ticlttes o nutrient deficiencies may require backfill, soil amendments, Cobblestones unless otherwise specified by the City Engiiteer. as determined by the City inspector. 15. Pursuant, to Municipal Code Section 16.37:010, no person shall make connections from a source of 2 Conduit shall be 3-inch alvanized steel with ull ro a or as s ecifie 3' All street trees_ are subject to ins an 9 P p specified. ) 1 peCfion_ d sicceptance by the Engineering Services energy_ , fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes.°and for e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per Ci, Standards Department: which a permit ( required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, or as directed by the City Engineer: 4)Street trees are to be plantedllpdr pdtilic improvement plans only., all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and f. Existing City roads requiring ,construction shall remain open to traffic at all times With adequate accepted by the City- Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building,, detours dunng. construction. .Street or lane closure permits are ,required. A cash deposit shall be structure or unit, the development may have energy connections_ made in equal proportion to the provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be, refunded upon completion of the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer approval, as determined by the, City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and, maintainable g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks., Under sidewalk drains shall be installed access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager,prtOf to-submittal,for,first plan check. required by these conditions of development approval 20. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger shall be installed per City Standards in 16. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: accordance with the'City's street tree program. Copley Drive Curb 8 Gutter A.C. Pavement Sidewalk Drive Approach Street Lights Street Trees www CtfyofRC.us W +!!4 ttygtR,fx u % ww.City www C,fyofRC.us Printed`7l30/2ot A Q tS of a i{ tinted T130IZd d si �, I Ihted. / Qts spa�.o tip;fli Roriti /30 Q/s Page 6t ii3- ofRC is, ' a9 s Project#: SU OTT 199f7 CEQAW14-00023;"ORC2018-00566 S,UBTT19917 CEQA20'14-00023, DRC2018-00566 isroject#: SU8TT19917 CEQ42014-00023. DRC2018-00566 Project Name: Tract 19917 Pm Name: 'Tract 19917 Project',Name: Tract 19917 - .- pd Location; -wcQ22610230-0000 - Codation` - 022610230-0000 Location: - 022610230-0000 Project Type: tentative Tract Map CEQA Review. Variance Ptpjletet Type Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance Project Type. Tentative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF'THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT. Eng[neering Services Department Engineering Services bepartme'nt Fire Prevention 1 Ne111iF Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval StandaM Conditions of:Approval 22. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed 23. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed 1. Design 'guidelines for Fire Hydrants the follo*ring provides design guidelines for the spacing and legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the,- title page of the street improvement ilocation of fire hydrants.- plans Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item 'within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet _ (typically Sheet 1)." Where 'a. For single-family residential projects in the designated Hazardous Fire Area, the fire hydrant public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those ,areas shall be per the public design 8 installation shall be in accordance to RCFPD Policies and Standards landscape improvement plans. landscape improvement plans. ` b. If any portion of a facility or building is located more :than 150 feet from a public fire hydrant Wilshire Drive Street"V measured on an approved route around the exterior of the, facility or building, additional private or Botanical Name -Chital;pa tashkentensis Botanical Name - Prunus blireiana public fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. Common Name-'Chitalpa Common Name -F1'owering Plum, Min. Grow Space--3' Min. Grow Space - 3' c. 'Provide one tare•hydrant for each 1000 gpm of required fireflow,or Prat ion&thereot Spacing 50' O.C. Spacing - 40' O.C. 2. The architectural plans for the construction .of the buildings must be' in accordance with the current Size - 1,5 Gallon Size- 15 Gallon editions of the CBC Chapter 7A, The California Residential'Code, the RCFPD Ordinance, Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1) All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans: Construction Notes for Street Trees: 3.., This project is located within the "State Responsibility Area" (SRA), the "Very, High; Fire Hazard; - Severity Zone"- (VHFHSZ), City of Rancho Cucamonga "'Hillside District", and/or within the area. 1) All'street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. identified on the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan_, Exhibit V-7 as High Probability-High; 2) 'Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils` report shall be furnished to the 2) Prior to the commen,cLin*ht of any planting, an agronomic soils f hall b Lport se furnished to the Consequence for Fire Risk. These locations `-- - q ese ocat ons have been determined to be within the "Hazardous., City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient :deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill' soil amendments, Fire Area as defined by the Fire District_ The Hazardous Fire Area is based on, maps produced by as determined b � ` s as determined by the City inspector. y the City inspector, the California Department of Forestry.as adopted bythe RCFPD`. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance: by the Engineering Sentaces 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Department. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 4) Street trees are to be planted per public ir-hprove Tent plans,only. Building and Safety Services Department 24, A permit from the San Bernardino County' Flood Control District is required for work within its Standard Conditions of Approval right-of-way. 1. Submit two sets of structural calculations, two sets of energy conservation calculations, and a soils 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, report. Architect's/Engineer's stamp and "wet" signature are required prior to plan,pheck submittal. CITY electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. 2. Submit five complete sets of plans including the following: DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: Easements shall be provided as required. 26. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. a. Site/Plot Plan; CITY OF RANCHO C U CAM O N GA b. Foundation Plan and reverse foundation plan (when applicable); 27. Water and' sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to ``meet the requirements of the c. Floor Plan; Cuca PRECISE GRADING PLANS m ong a Valley Water District (CVWD). Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the d. Roof and Floor Framing Plan and reverse Roof and Floor Framing Plan (when applicable); Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the e. Electrical Plans (2 sets, detached) including the size of main switch, number and size of service TRACT NO. 19917 CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such entrance conductors, panel schedules, and single line diagrams, letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the f. Plumbing and Sewer Plans, including isometrics, underground diagrams, water and waste case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. diagram, sewer or septic system location, fixture units, gas piping and heating and air conditioning; CONDITIONS 0 F APPROVAL 28. Approvals have not been secured from all utilities. and other interested agencies involved, Approval and Y a. Planning Department Project Number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR,; CUP, DRC, etc.) clearly of the final parcel map will be subject to any requirements theit'ma. be received.from them. ide[,tified on the outside of all plans. Standard con t1'Strlldtion Unit 3. Contractors 'must show proof of State and City licenses and 1N.ttricecs' Compensation coverage ito Fire Prevention 1.Now Co �oFEss/o ditions,of.•Approvat the City prior to permit issuance. Q Nq� DESIGN RECOMMENDED ars''1te permits are required for fencing and/or walls. Fs9 �� AU DAV I D EVAN S Q pA��ed, f3o/ ot8 �afWW.QlyofRGos VYwry -ityofRC.us- vwvter,- Y o.8722 DRAWN 141 250 S ANDASSOCIATES INC. ` � m �d off��`us N 2 4 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite SHEET 1�`°bt 14 Pnntad:7p0720:16, 8t?ape t3'o'-t8 P.,inted:Yl37i/',tittd 'Paoli 1 6f O * Ontario C ifornia 91764 12 OF 17 J� CIV I� �Q' qTF OF OhL\F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12/09/2020 FILE NO , - _ b.-RC2018-005h6Profi SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023, DRC201$ Of56 Project SUBTT19917 CEQA2014-00023. ��C2018-005fi6 e Pro1ect;#: SUBTT19917 CEQA20t4-0002ct Pro` c SUBTT19917 CEQA2014- 0023, DRC2018-0056t _..- -� ect Name: Tract 19917 _ P-ro`ecf Name: Tract 19917 - 'Project Name: Tract 19917' Project Name: Tract 1991,7 13j ,j Location: 022610230-0000 �- Location: - 022610230-0000 - Location - 022610230-0000 - Location: 022610230-0000 t T Ten a`v r - Project Type: Tentative Tract Ma CE ,A Project T Ten - - Pro�ect Type.-, Tentative Tract Ma CEQA Review, Variance - - ojec ype. t b e T act Map CEQA Review, Variance 1 yP p Q Review, Variance j Type: tative Tract Map CEQA Review, Variance 1P e ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Grading Section Grading Section Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval, Standard Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval 5. NOTE; The construction of this tract must b in separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal 16. Prior to the issuance of ,the Certificate 28 On the rough grading plan and the precise grading and drainage Ian the engineer t e accordance with the approved Fire Protection Plan 9 9 s mlttal is required for all new construction projects t of Occupancy the engineer of record shall certify the° P 9 9 9 Po record shall 9 9 9 p and/or the California Building; this tract is located in the VHFHSZ. and for existing buildings,where improvements being proposed will generate .50 cubic yards or more functionality of the storm water quality management plan (VVQMP), best management practices show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the 6.: The structures in this tract must be equipped with automatic fire sprinkler in accordance with theof combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall, be prepared, stamped, and wet, (BMP) devices. building exterior and exterior ground surface meet` the requirements of Sections CBC 1804.3CRC approved Fire protection Plan and The California Residential Code. P signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer. 17. The Water Quality Management' Plan WQMP shall include a co • ` R401.3. CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRCR703.6.2.1 of the current adopted ( ) py of ,the project. Conditions of California Building Code/Residential Code. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust: Control Measures att_cf 'peace 'a Approval. 7. Provide compliance with the California Residential/Code Building Oode (C6 11RQ) for property line dust control sign the project site prior to the issuance of a grading clearances considering use, area, and fire-resistive construction. 9 P j P gad ng permit. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the public sewer water ,plans shall be 90% complete as $. 7. ,If a Rough Grading and; Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Building and Safety Official for reviewed by the Cucamonga Valley Water District. In :addition, the public sewer mains shall be Provide compliance with the California Building Code for required oCcupantry separations: review, that plan shall °a separate planipermit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. extended to the westerly boundary of the subdivision. 9. Roofing material shall be installedper,the manufacturer's "high wind" instructions. $. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm. event for on-site drainage shall be 19. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho 'Cucamonga's "Memorandum of prepared and' submitted to the Building and Safety Official for review and approval for on-site storm Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval 10. The Building and Safety Official shall provide streef addresses after tract/parcel map recordation by the Building:Official and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. and prior to issuance of Building Permits. water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by 11. Construction activity shall not occur. between the hours of 8`00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. Monday through the Engineer of Record. 20. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge 'Identification Saturday,with no construction on Sunday or holidays. R..` It shall be 4he, responsibility of ';the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage easements Number(WDID). prior to the issuance of a grading permit. 21. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination. garden/retaining walls along the 12. Prior to issuance of Building Permits for a new residential protect or major addition, the .applicant 'I0.;All sl'q es shall be'a minimum 2-foo offset from the roe bounds the structural c i shall pay development fees at the established rate. Such fees may include, but are not limited to: P- t public right of way or private property. P P rtY rY a culations for the wall shall .assume a level toe/heel at the 11. Private sewer,, water, and storm adjacent off-site property(i.e, a manufactured slope is not present). City 'Beautification Fee, Park Fee, Drainage Fee, Transportation DeYelopment Fee, Permit and Plan drain improvements_ Will be designed per the, latest adopted 22. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval .shall ,be, Check Fees. and' School Fees. Applicant shall provide a copy of the school fees: receipt. to the: California Plumbing Gcfde. Building and Safety Services Department prior to permit issuance. final within the engineered wall plans and calculations, 12. The final grading artd ,drainage plan shall show existing topography ;a minimum; of 100-feet beyond 23. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters. 13. Plans shall be submitted for plan check and- approved prior to construction. All plans, shall be, project boundary. and swales where concentrated flows exceed. 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent marked with- the project file number (i.e., SUBTT, SUBTPM, MDR, CUP; DRC, etc.). The applicant - _ - P 13. The applicant shall' provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined shall comply with the latest adopted California, Codes, and all other applicable- =codes, ordinances 24. Prior to removing, fences or walls along common_ lot lines and; prior to constructin walls aion exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a .grading permit. The grading agreement and p g g and regulations in .effect at `the, time of permit application. Contact the Building and Safety Services common lot lines the 'applicant shall provide a fetter from the adjacent property owners allowiIn 1 P ►ty ( j g. bond shall"be approved by the Building and Safety Official work on the adjacent property. Department for availability of the Code Adoption Ordinance and.applicable handouts. 14. The precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the t(oi rtat provided in the City of Rancho -_p 25 In the equestrian trails: - Provide PVC fence, 4" thick DG surface, paral'11el drainage V ditch, bridge Cucamonga handout"Information for Grading Plans and Permit". Grading Sectionover V ditch where necessary for access corals, gates to corrals, S< 5% cross fall 2%, S>5% cross 15. Grading. Inspections: a) Prior t0 the start Of ,grading operations the owner and grading contractor fall 4%°. Water bars required ,at the spacing for the,slopes shown respectively: 50` for 4% to 6%, 40• Standard Conditions of Approval shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project for 6%° to 90/c, 30' for 9% to 12%, 20' for 12%+. In the equestrian trails water bar h q r s shall also be 1. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building, Inspector to discuss about grading placed at the top and bottom wherei the gradient es, ;of, the trail changes,g i.e. s, steep downhill slope Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) requirements and preventive measures; etc. If a- pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours which will cause additional erosion to the trail. shall be in substantial conformance with the(approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan_ . from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the 26. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis 2. A soils report shall be prepared b auilding Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the .City of Rancho Cucamonga Building for the underground infiltration h P p p y qualed Engineer licensed by the State of CaliforniaCatlfornia to perform g chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans; and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance. to request the following grading Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a reg ular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) shall implement design recommendations per said report. inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) as described in the Storm Water QualityManagement Plan Completion of Rough Grading, g p ) P 9 prepared for the subject ,project. All p g g, prior to issuance of the building permit, III At the completion of costs associated-with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 3. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building at the time of application focGrading and Drainage Plan review: and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and 27. If the depths of the infiltration pits is 10-feet or greater below grade the applicant shall provide a 4. The final Grading and Drainage. Plan, appropriate`" certifications and compaction reports shall be properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record iv) The rough copy of EPA Form 7520-16 (inventory of Injection Wells) with the Facility ID Number assigned to the completed, submitted, and approved by the Building `and Safety Official prior to the issuance of Building and Safety Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit. grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a 9 building permits. designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. wwNr:QMotRCrus +mtet '' 7 i�4t ` www.0 _... :Cityofl'3Ca'is ityofRC.us Printed ,,3�2��iF Page 18,0�.18 PnnleC ?l30J2Q.�8 M1 PaaP'�5 c`.'.5 ',,Printed-7F30/.OtB 'Page "o,tE+ c DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY APPROVED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRECISE GRADING PLANS TRACT NO. 19917 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Q�,oFESS/ON F DESIGN RECOMMENDED tic AU DAVID EVANS Q m ANoASSOCIATES INC. LU No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 13 OF 17 J�• HIV I� �Q' qTF OF CpO� CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATI FILE NO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N.Q. 18-48 '188 SUBTT19917— CASTILLO SUBTT19917—CASTILLO SUBTT1.9917- CASTILLO August 8, 2018 ° ` August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 3 Page 4 RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 Page 2 •- � t Page - a. That the tentative tract is consistent with the General Plan Development agencies raised questions that required further environmental study. and the. revision A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF d. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very'Low (/Lf pment Code, Y he and and any applicable specific, plans The application proposes to subdivide the 7.17 acreproject recirculation of the IS/MND. The IS/MND was revised sighificantl as requested and now al RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, and i Y q so site into 10 parcels for future single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan includes revised discussion and additional'miti�ations related to noise impacts. The IS/MND was TRACT MAP SUBTT19917, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 7.1.7 ACRES desi nation is Very Low VL Residential; tecirculated. No additional c INTO 1,0 LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF a The proposed project involves the;subdivision of a,7.1'7,acre parcel Into 10 lots 9 rY ( ) _ and comments have been received in response to this recirculated environmental document; and THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NORTH 'OF THE 210 ;forfuture residential development; 2irid b. The design or improvements of the tentative tract is consistent with the General FREEWAY AND'-- EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The project site is vacant and the b. The Planning Commission has,reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration 'EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE, AND MAKING f. Development/construction of the homes following the subdivision of the property r 9 9 and FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF -APN: -1 - will be by others, as it is not the intent of the applicant to do so themselves; and proposed land use is consistent,with the land uses within the vicinity where the project is located all wmments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole—and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared incompliance with g. The site'is located withih the'Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan; and CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning R, Recitals. Specific Plan (ESP), which permits a maximum density of 2 dwelling units per acre, with ed C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The 7,17` Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent. average lot size of 25,000 and a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet. Lots within the proposed acre project site is adjacent to existing residential l judgment and analysis of the P 1 Bob Castillo filed an application for the approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917, subdivision range in size from 23,276 square feet to 25,557 square feet, with an average lot size 1 9 and uses to the north and east and will obtain l 9 y e Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative of 25,078 square feet; and access through the continuation of the existing street network through the extension of Wilshire Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, Tract Map request is referred tows "the application." Drive and Copley Drivel;,and G. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation ,h. The project complies witKall applicable development standards,as deson'bedf In d. The design of the Monitoring :2� On March J, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho.Cucamonga and Figure 5-2 of the ESP and the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; and g e subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental Mo toring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. The proposed project is for Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance conducted a duly notice public hearing on the application and continued the application to a date the subdivision of the 7.17 acre site into 10 lots for future residential development. No homes are with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore non-specific. i. One neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather Input and comments.from p g the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site. The meeting was held at. proposed in conjunction with this tentative tract map. Mitigation measures described in the Initial adopts the Mitigation Monitoring.Program for the project; and 1 A Summit Intermediate School located at 5959 Eastvenue on November 7, 2015. No members 'Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) will be implemented during the construction and 3. On August 8, 2018, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga �conducted operation of the project; and d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that of the public attended the scheduled neighborhood meeting and no public comments were e Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings date. submitted in advance of the meeting; and e. The tentative tract is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Manager of the City of proposed:subdivision was designed to meet all'applicable development standards outlined in the Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Plannin 4. :All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. j. The Design and Technical Review Committees reviewed the project on g August 4, 2015 and both recommended approval' of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Development Code and Etiwanda Specific Plan,,and the.design and development standards and Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive $ P ! _. _ . Rancho B., Resolution. Commission;:and: policies of the Planning Commission; and Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (9.0.9) 477-2750. f The design of the tentative tract will not conflict with an easement acquired b 5• Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1; 2, 3 and 4 above NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planririg k The project does not include the construction of houses. The architecture of the y q y g the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property Within the proposed this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and eve Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga.as follows: � houses for this subdivision will be subject to review and action by the Design Review Committee subdivision.. P rtY P P d 1 every condition set forth and Planning Commission at a later date following the submittal of a Design Review application;. s on. There are no public easements across the project site. below,and ill the an Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference_ . 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, and 4. Based upon the facts and information,contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Environmental Mitigation PartA, of this Resolution are true:and correct. Declaration,.together with all,written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment 1. The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project.on September 9, 2015 and. :for the application, the .Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial:evidence Air Quality 2, Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- recommended approval of the proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission, and ide ce that the project will have a significant effect upon: the .:environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative . referenced public hearing on August 8, 2018, including written and oral-staff reports, together with Declaration an m. As required b Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Consultation d Monitoring Program attached hereto; and incorporated herein by this reference, Short°Temt (Constrt�ctlon) Emissions public testimony,.this Commission hereby specifically finds as`follows: q Y w Requests to the several Tribal Governments that requested to be notified following a based upon the findings as follows a The application apples to a 7:17 acre site, located directly north of the 21.0 completeness determination for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. The notices were mailed on All clearing, grading, earth-moving, or excavation activities shall Freeway at the future easterly extensions of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive which i September 10, 2015 and provided for a 30-day comment period ending on October 12 2 1 a; Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act "CEQA" and the Cit ' cease when winds exceed 25'mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order Y P Y c s located Y P 9 0 5. No ( ) y s generally in the area east of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street; and response to the Tribal Consultation Request was received; and locali CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study (IS) of the potential environmental to limit fugitive dust emissions. effects of the project. Based:on the findings contained in that IS, City staff determined that, with b. The property to the north of the subject site contains existing single-family homes n. This application was advertised as a public hearing in the Inland Valley Daily the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources, Air Quality 2) The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and (Tract 18708, a 7-lot subdivision), the property to the south is the Foothill Freeway (SR-210) and Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property owners Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions. disturbed areas within theProject are watered at least three (3) times beyond that are existing single-family homes, to the east is the East Etiwanda Creek and the San within a 660-foot radius of the project site. Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Tribal Cultural Resources there would be no substantial daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of Sevaine Flood Control Basin, and the property to the west is asingle-family tract currently under evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that disturbed areas, shall occur at least three times a day, preferably in construction(Tract 181'22_, a 76-lot subdivision); and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- determination, a Mitigated. Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff the midmorning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated c. The project site is rectangular in shape with an east-west dimension of above, this Commission hereby finds.and concludes as follows: Negative Declaration The City received comments from the San Bernardino County Department 3) The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads�and ` of Public Works SBCDPW and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), Both Project site areas are reduced to 15 miles per hour or less:approximately 330 feet and anorth-south_dimension of approximately 940'feet; and ( ) P (, ) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 'f8-.4Q PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION N0 J4_4_ r3 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONNO, 1,840 . SUBTT19917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 Page 5 Page 6 _ Page 7 4) All construction eoU101%6nt shall be maintained in good operating result of hauling: Timing may vary depending upon the'titite of conducted by a permitted biologist, and the USFWS shall be condition so as to reduce operationalemissions. The contractor shall year of construction; consulted for incidental take permitting if SBKR are found on-site. ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained as per manufacturers' specifications. Maintenance • Suspend grading operations during high winds (i.e., w'ind speeds 2) Three days prior to the removal of vegetation or ground-disturbing records shall be available at the construction.site for City verification.' exceeding 25 mph) in accordance with Rule 40.3 requirements. activities, a breeding bird survey that is in conformance with the Migratory Bird. Act shall be required to determine whether nesting is 5) Prior to the issuance of any grading .permits, the developer shall • Maintain a minimum 24-inch freeboard ratio-on soils haul trucks occurring. Occupied nests shall not be disturbed unless a qualified Submit construction plans to the City denoting the proposed schedule or cover payloads using tarps or other suitable means. biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either (a) the and projected equipment use: Construction contractors shall provide juveniles from the occupied nests.are�adult birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation: or (b) the �` . evidence that low emission mobile construction equipment will be 11) The site shall be treated~with water or othersoil-stabilizing agent foraging independently and are utilized, or that their use was investigated and found to be infeasible (approved by SCAQMD and Regional Water Quality Control Board capable of independent survival. If the biologist is unable to verify one (RWQCB)) daily to reduce PM,_o.emissons, in accordance with of the above conditions,'then no disturbance shall occur within 300 `for the project: Contractors shall also conform to any construction SCAQMD_ Rule 403. feet of non-raptor nests, and within S,000 feet of raptor nests, Burin measures imposed by the, South. Coast Air Quality Management g District (SCAQMD) as well as City Planning Staff the breeding season to avoid'abandonment of the young. 12) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall 6 The construction contractor shall utilize electric or clean alternative be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided through the `fuel powered equipment where feasible. 96 hours-or more to reduce PM,o emissions. establishment of an appropriate buffer setback, as determined by a qljalified wildlife biologist. The temporary"no construction" area shall 7) The construction contractor shall. ensure that construction-grading Long Term Proiect'Oyeratidnal Impacts •,. be maintained' untilthe nest has completed its cycle, as determined plans include a statement that work, crews will shut off equipment by a qualified wildlife biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and When not in use. 13) Improve thermal integrity, of the buildings and reduce thermal load .alj,nestlings have fledged and have left the nest, construction in the with automated time:,clocks or occupant sensors. .area may resume. 8) All asphalt shall meet or exceed 'Performance Standards noted in 14) Landscape with native and/or drought-resistant species to reduce 3) Perform a Burrowing Owl Survey that is in conformance SCAQMD Rule 1108. Y an a with the water consumption and toL,.1provide passive solar benefits. Department of Fish and Wildlife Staff Report on Burrowing Owl 9) All paints and coatings shall meet or exceed performance standards Mitigation and submit the written report outlining the findings to the noted in SCAQMD Rule 1113. Paints and coatings shall be applied 15). Provide lighter color roofrng� and road materials and tree planting California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the Planning either by hand or high-volume, low-pressure spray. programs to comply with the;AQMP Miscellaneous Sources MSC-01 Department within 30 days of groundbreaking activity. The survey measure. shall include a'habitat assessment, survey and impact analysis. The 10) All construction equipment shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 Burrowing Owl Survey shall follow,the following protocol: and 403. Additionally, contractors shall include the following 16) All residential and commercial structures shall be required to provisions: incorporate high-efficiency/low-polluting heating, air conditioning, 0 Burrowing Owl Survey methodology shall be based on CITY appliances, and water heaters. Appendix D (Breeding and Non-Breeding Season Surveys and DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: • Re-establish ground cover on the construction site through Reports) of the CDFW Staff Report, Results of the pre seeding an 1 Z) commercial All residential and ial structures shall be required to construction survey shall be provided to CDFW and the City. If d watering. CITY O F RANCHO C U CA M O N G A incorporate thermal pane windows and weather-stripping.. the pre-construction. survey does not identify burrowing owls on the project site, then no further mitigation is required. If • Paver2ott apply gravel to any -site haul road&. PRECISE GRADING PLANS 18) All`new development in the City of Rancho Cucamonga shall comply burrowing owls are found.,to be utilizing the project site during; to with South Coast,Air Quality'Management District's Rule 445, Wood the pre-construction survey, measures shall be developed by Phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended ,periods of time. Burning Devices. Rule 445 was adopted in March 2008 to reduce the qualified biologist in coordination with CDFW to avoid. TRACT NO. 19917 emissions of PM2.1b and precludes the installation of indoor or outdoor Impacting occupied burrows durIing the nesting period. These a wood burning devices (i',e. fireplaces/hearths) in new development measures_ shall be based o n the most current CDFWprotocols • Schedule activities a minimize the amounts of exposed on or after March 9, 20 0 : RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. and will at minimum include establishment of buffer setbacks from occupied burrows and owl monitoring. If ground-disturbing Dispose of surplus excavated material in accordance wirith local biological Resources activities are delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after ordinances and use sound engineering practices. the pre-construction survey, the site shall be resurveyed for 1) Within 30 days prior to the initiation of groundbreaking activity, owls., perform a focused trapping,survey for the San Bernardino kangaroo o Q�pF ESS IONq� • Sweep streets according to a schedule established by the City if rat (SBKR) following the United States Fish and Wildlife Service DESIGN RECOMMENDED silt is rained-,,o.verto adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a During the non'breeding season from September 1 through �`�� ��`�� �Fs9 F��, DAV I D EVANS Q (USFINS) protocol. The SBKR focu . trapping survey shag be January 31, if burrows are occupied by migratory or non- c� m AU ANDASSOCIATES INC. � No.s7222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET * * Ontario California 91764 14 OF 17 J� c I\- �Q q�F 0 A`\F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 69 2020 FILE NO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIOR NO. IS-48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1$-4'S'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO."1:6=�� � NO. 18-48 S SUBTT19917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO UBT719917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 Page 8 Page 9, Page 10 Page 11 migratory resident burrowing owls during a pre-construction + Cltider establishing provisions t:o require incorporation of Geology and Soils manufactured locally., Use `Green Building Materials° such as survey, ,burrow exclusion and/or closure may be used -to archaeological sites within new de�telopments, using4heir special materials that Pre resource efficient, recycled and manufactured in an . '.es as, theme or for-al l 1) The site shall be treated with water r - environmentally friendly exclude owls from those burrows. Burrow exclusion and/or point o- other soil stabilizing agent , Y yay including low-volatil"r$anic- (approved by SCAOMD and RWQCB) daily to reduce PM10 compourld;VOC) materials. in coordination o only be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist o� purs"o'e educating the public about the ar.ehaleol - ical henta a of emissions, in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 or -planted with in .coordination with CDFW using the most current CDFW = _ 09 g guidelines. the area, drought resistant landscaping as soon as possible. 8) Design all buildings to exceed California Building Code Title 24 energy standard including but not limited to any combination of; During the avian nesting: season from February 1 through Prepare a mitigation plan: consistent with Section 21083.2 2) Frontage public streets shall be swept according to a schedule August 31, if nests are discovered, they shall be avoided Archaeological resources of CEQA to eliminate adverse project established by'the City to reduce PM,o emissions associated with (r *d instlafi n,. effects on significant, important, and unique vehicle racking ofsoil off-site. Timing ,may vary depending upon the through establishment of an a g prehistoric w determined b a qualified Wildlife appropriate buffer setback, as time of ear of construction. + Lirtiltt�leaks sites, capping X ge through Elie s(rttcture. resources, including but not limited to, avoiding-:archaeological y q dlife biologist. The temporary no pp g or covering sites with soil, planning:the site as a ` construction" area would have to be maintained until the nest Into; gate Energy Star or better hall mpleted its cycle, as determined by a qualified wildlife park or green space or paying an in-kind mitigation fee, 3) Grading operations shall be suspended when wind speeds exceed gY rated windows, spadle hfttrhg 25 mph to minimize PM,�, emissions from ,=the site during such andohng equipment, light fixtures, and appliances. _biologist. Once the nest cycle is complete and all nestlings have . Prepare a technical resources management report, documentin episodes: fledged' and have left the nest, construction in the area may P 9 p � � Landscape and develop site utilizing shade,-prevailing win dsr a,iii resume. the inventory, evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project area. Submit one copy of the completed report 4) Chemical soil-stabilizers (approved by SCAQMD and RWQCB) shall landscaping. - with original illustrations, to the San Bernardino Count be applied to all inactive construction areas that remain inactive for 4} A quailified�;biologist shall monitor clearing and grubbing activities as -.- Y � 96•h urs .more t the impact vegetation onsite A g p Archaeological Information Center for permanent archiving. _ _ o. o reduce PM,c) emissions. Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Y P 9 qualified biologist shall inspect 9 debris piles, pipes, burrows,, vegetation, leaf .litter piles_ , and other Greenhouse>O �Emisslons . , „- potential refugia for sensitive wildlife species prior to initiation of 2) if any paleontological resource (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are Cnstall light;colpred cool rogtis,and cool pavements. encountered: before or during grading, the developer will retain a Cumulative Short � � • .: - clearing, grubbing, grading, or any other Project activity that may w ort Term (Construction) GHG Emissions Install solar or tight emitting diodes (LED's) for outdo ct!c jlighting. qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take injure or kill sensitive wildlife species. If wildlife is discovered, the o qualified..biologist shall move it out of harm's way or allow it to move a Ppr PriatE measures to protect or preserve them for study. The 1) The ro ect must comply with all rules h paleontologist shall submit a report of=findings that will also provide p j P Y that assist in r+adu`cing short- 9) Prepare a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate safely out of the work area prior to initiation of Project activities. term air pollutant emission in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403 for-the project and include thet following; specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures i e., regarding fugitive dust including treating the site with water or other PoteritiaF day coosts'forpallid bat (e.g., caves, crevices. mines, hollow (�. paleontological ,,monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where soil-stabilizing agent twice daily or replanting disturbed areas as i° Install' water efficient landscapes `and irrigation systems and mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the .program must include_, but � , trees, buildings, etc.) shall be inspected by a qualified 'bat biologist quickly as passible. devices incompliance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga,Water prior to initial ground disturbance. If bats are roosting, a bat exclusion not be limited to, the following measures: Efficient Landscape compliance Ordinance. plan shall be prepared and submitted to CDFW for review prior to 2) The", he construction contractor shall select construction equipment impacts. If a colony is discovered during the breeding season(March- Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow based on low-emission factors and high en ergy e gy efficiency and submit, Use reclaimed water for landscaping within the project if,available October the biologist shall determine a the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the a statement on the grading Ian "that ensures}� 9� appropriate avoidance site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. 9 9 P t es all construction and/orinstatl the,infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water~. measures; including, but not limited to sound walls, buffed, and equipment 'will be tuned and maintained in accordance with the Project phasing/timing to prevent disturbance to the colony until all manufactures' specification. • Design, building to be water efficient by installing water effrclehit Should fossils be found Within ai area being cleared or graded, 9 young are weaned and capable of foraging independently, fixtures. and appliances including low flow faucets, dual -flush divert earth-disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has 3) Trucks shall not idle continuouslV or more than 5 minutes. toilets and waterless urinals/water heaters. Cultural Resources completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and 4) Alternative fuel powered equipment shall`' be utilized in lieu of g irrigation to .oOhtrol runoff:and to remove water to non- during Design irri atio 1) If any prehistoric archaeologica_I resources are encountered before or notify the monitor of the find. gasoline- or diesel-powered engines where feasible. vegetated surfaces. during grading, the developer will retain a qualified archaeologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for 5) Construction should be timed so as not to interfere with peak-hour 10) Reuse and recycle construction and demolition waste. Provide protect or preserve them for study. With the assistance of the documentation in the summary report and transfer to an traffic. interior and exterior storage areas for recyclables and Teen waste in �Irchaeologist, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will: appniate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum}. 9 public areas. Educate eirip( i ops about reducing waste and about 6) Ridesharing and transit incentives -shah be supported and Enact iintennt measures to rotect undesignated sites 'from ubrrtitsumm2ry report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer encouraged for the construction)crew recyc�t p collected specimens with a demolition or significant modification without an opportunity for P copy of the report-to San Bernardino the City to establish its archaeological value. County Museum. Cumulative Long Term (Operational) Gl4G Emissions 7) Construction and Building materials shall be produced and/or PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESO6UMISI O. 1,040 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 SUBTT19917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Redevelopment adopted by the:City of Rancho Cucarrlonga in Me 11: ' Noise barriers shall be constructed as either a solid wall, or a Hydrology'.anaf;N!aterGlualir• 2004. combination of an earthen berm and wall such that the top of wall for Construction, either the six-foot high or eight-foot high wall (measured from the 7) Landscaping plans shall include finished lot grade/pad grade) is at the minimum required height (top- 1), p provisions for controlling and of-wall elevation of 1,421 feet). The sound attenuation wall shall be 1) Prior to issuance'of grading permits, the permit applicant shall submit minimizing the use of fertilizers/pesticides/herbicides.,Landscaped to the Building Official for ,approval, a Storm Water Pollution areas'shall be monitored and maintained for at least two years to solid and constructed of concrete masonry units (CMU) with no 'Prevention Plan (SWPPP) specifically identifying Best Management ensure adequate coverage and stable growth. Plans for these areas, cracks or gaps, through orbelow the wall Any seams or cracks must Practices (BMPs) that shall be used on-site to reduce pollutants including monitoring provisions for a minimum of two years, shall be be filled or caulked., Any gate(s) proposed to be constructed in a during construction activities entering the storm drain system to the submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of sound wall must be designed with overlapping closures. The gate(s) maximum_ extent practical. grading permits. may be of 3/<-inch thick or greater wood, solid-sheet metal of at least 18-gauge metal; or an exterior=grade solid-core steel door with 2) An Erosion Control Plan shall be prepared, included in the Grading 8) Pryor to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the prefabricated door jambs. Plan, and implemented for the proposed project that identifies specific City Building Official for approval of a Water.Quality Management measures to control on-site and off-site erosion from the time ground Plan (WQMP), including a project description and identifying Best Interior disturbing activities are initiated through completion of grading. This Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on-site to reduce Erosion Control Plan shall include the following measures at a pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent House product is not proposed at this time as the applicant only proposes minimum: a) Specify the timing of grading and construction to practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural to subdivide the project site for future residential development. An analysis minimize soil exposure to rainy periods experienced in Southern measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and of interior noise levels generated by external sources will be required with Redevelopment adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in June any proposal to� construct all 10 houses within the project or with any California, and b) An inspection and maintenance program shall be proposal to construct each house within the project (e.g., proposals for -included to ensure that any erosion which does-occur either on-site 2004. single-lot development that are submitted individually). This noise analysis reoff-site as a result of this. project will be corrected through a 9) Prior to issuance of radin or avin will be required to determine and discuss the mitigation measures remediation or restoration program within a specfied time frame_ 9 9 P g permits, the applicant shall obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage necessary to attenuate, control, and maintain interior noise levels to 45 , under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) CNEL or less. Once these mitigation measures have been determined, the 3) During construction, temporary berms such as sandbags or gravel dikes must..be used to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water project proponent for the house product will be required to implement them, the site when there is rainfall or other runoff. Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., 3) Prior to the issuance of an radin a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shalt be Y 9 g plans a .construction-related 4); During construction, to remove pollutants, street cleaning will be submittedl,to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES noise mitigation plan shall be submitted to the City for review and performed prior to storm events and after the use of water trucks to General Construction Permit. approval. The Plan shall depict the location of the construction control dust in order to prevent discharge of debris or sediment from equipment and how the noise from this equipment would be mitigated the site. 10) The developer shall implement the BMPs identified in the Water during construction. Quality Management Plan prepared by (HP Engineering, April 2015) 5) Prior to issuance of grading or paving permits, the applicant shall to reduce construction pollutants from entering the storm drain 4) During all project site excavation and grading, the project contractors CITY obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with obtaining coverage system to the maximum extent practical. shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) operating and maintained mufflers consistent with the;manufacturers' CITY O F RANCHO C U CAM O N GAd d t Noise standards. General Construction Storm Water Permit from the State Water No ` Resources Control Board. Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., Exterior' 5) The project contractor shall place all stationary construction a copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be :equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from sensitive PRECISE GRADING PLANS submitted to the City Building Official for coverage under the NPDES General Construction Permit. 1) A .noise barrier with a top-of-wall elevation -of 1,421 feet (stepped receptors nearest the protect site. TRACT N O. 19917 down slightly from the 1,421.6 foot top-of-wall height of the existing Post-Construction Operational sound attenuation wall in place at the adjacent Tract 18122 property, 6) The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging. in areas located to the west of the project site) shall be constructed along the that will create the greatest distance between construction-related 6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the entire length of the south property lines of Lots 8, 9, and 10, and noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest the project site RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL extending approximately 40 feet north (measured from the south during all project construction. City Building Official for approval of a Water Quality Management property line) along the east property line of Lot 10. Construction of Plan (WOMP), including a project description and identifying Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will bie used on-site to reduce this noise barrier shall be completed prior to the occupancy of any ) The construction contractorshallobtain the Cltysapproval for its haul new house associated with the subject tentative tract map. plan, with the planned haul trt,tpk routes avoiding residential areas to pollutants into the storm drain system to the maximum extent. Q�OFESS/pNibl t fe asible. practicable. The WQMP shall identify the structural and non-structural the ex ��o q�F DESIGN RECOMMENDED measures consistent with the Guidelines for New Development and �`� CFs9 !e AU DAV I D EVAN S Q m ANDASSOCIATES INC. Lu No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 15 OF 17 J�• HIV I� �Q' qTF OF CpL�F CHECKED R.C.E. No 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 09 2020 FILE NO , PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO 'Igo$ PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 18-48 'PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION_N.0 18-48 SUBTT199.17- CASTILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLQ SUBTT19917- CAS_ TILLO SUBTT19917- CASTILLO , August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 ,.August 8, 20.1.8 August 8 2018 1 -8i Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 1 8) The construction contractor shall change the timing and/or sequence archeological resources. The applicant shall submit the results of find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered The Lead Agency and%or-applicant shall, in good faith, consult with of the noisiest construction operations to avoid sensitive times of the these consultations to the City prior to issuance of grading permits for area may continue during this assessment period. The archaeologist the SMBMI_on the disposition and treatment of any artifacts or other day. the project site. shall contact the SMBMI for input regarding the preservation, cultural materials encountered during the project.. retention and final disposition of any discovered cultural resources. 9) Construction or grading shall not take place between the hours of 2) In the event that human remains or funerary objects are encountered The archaeologist shall prepare: a mitigation plan and technical 5) Non=Native American artifacts shall be inventoried, assessed, and 8.-00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m, on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any during any activities associated with the project, work In the resources management report, which shall document the inventory, analyzed for cultural affiliation, personal affiliation (prior ownership;), time on Sunday or a national holiday. immediate vicinity(within a 100-foot buffer of the find)shall cease and evaluation, and proposed mitigation of resources within the project function; and temporal placement. Subsequent to analysis and the.County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health andarea. Additionally, the SMBMI will be contacted if any such find occurs reporting, these artifacts shall be subjected to curation or returnedto 10) Construction or grading noise levels shall not exceed the standards Safety Code §7050.5, and that:code shall be enforced for the duration and be provided information and permitted/invited to perform a site the Property Owner/Developer, as deemed appropriate. specified in Development Code Section 17.66.050. as measured at of the project. visit when the archaeologist makes his/her assessment, so as to the property line. Developer shall hire a consultant to perform weekly provide Tribal input. Once ground-altering activities have ceased or the Project noise level monitoring as specified in Development Code Section Prior to the start of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall Archaeologist determines that monitoring activities are no longer 17.66.050. Monitoring at other times may be required by the Building arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction necessary, monitoring activities may be discontinued following to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial activities shall be evaluated by the Qualified Archaeologist and Native notification. Official. Said consultant shall report their findings to the Building Official within 24 hours-, however, if noise levels exceed the above objects. Any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be Monitor. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Tribe(s) Department, standards, then the consultant shall immediately notify the Building immediately reported to the County Coroner. The monitor will then shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation Official. If noise levels exceed the above standards, then construction notify the Qualified Archaeologist and the construction manager who of these resources. Typically, the Tribe(s) will request rebunal or 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this,Resolution. activities shall be reduced in intensity to a level of compliance with will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the preservation for educational purposes. If a resource is determined by above noise standards or halted. .coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The the Qualified Archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" APPROVEDAND ADOPTED THIS 8TH DAY OF AUGUST_ 2018� discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) or has a "unique 1 r) Haul truck deliveries shall not take place between the hours of disturbance. If Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as archaeological resource"pursuant to Public Resources Code Section PLANNING COMMISSION OF`THE CITY QE RANCHO CUCAMONGA 8:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely 21083.2(g), the Qualified Archaeologist shall coordinate,"With the time on Sunday or a national holiday. Additionally, if heavy trucks Descendent. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be applicant and the City to develop a_formal treatment plan that would used for hauling would exceed 100 daily trips (counting both to and fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be serve to, reduce impacts to the resources. The treatment plan - from the construction site), then the developer shall prepare a noise covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can. be moved by estabtish.ed for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resou_r,ces and Public BY. g plan denoting any construction traffic haul routes and heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening t0 protect the - mitigation include appropriate noise mitigation measures. To the extent feasible remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard Resources Code` Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological Rich Macias, Chairman the plan shall denote haul routes that do not pass sensitive land uses should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe(s) will make resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred orresdenfial dwellings. every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment :remains in situ and protected If the project cannot be diverted, it may may include implementation of archaeological data recovery,Tribal Cultural Resources be determined that burials. will be removed. The Tribe(s) will work, excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory. ATTEST: - closely with the Qualified Archaeologist to ensure that the excavation processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is Candyce B ett.;Secre ary 1} The applicant shall contact the SMBMI to discuss Tribal Monitoring of is treated carefully, ethically, and respectfully. If data recovery is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit a institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the San 1, reby c e Burnett, the foregoing e Planning Commission of the Carly Rancho Cucamonga, do the project during all ground disturbing activities, and any trenching approved by the 'Tribe(s), documentation shall be taken which hereby certify below the initial grade level, to ensure that cultural resources that may includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. 'Bernardino County Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept y rt y that the foregoing2esolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and be encountered during ground disturbances are protected and Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe(s) the material'. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of preserved for study, The monitors) must be approved by the Tribal for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk shall be donated to a local school or historical society in the area for the Planning Commission held on the8th day of August 2018, by the following vote-to-wit:. Representatives and will be present on-site during ground disturbing or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all educational purposes. activities. The Native American Monitor(s) will complete monitoring material. if the discovery of human remains includes 4 or more AYES: G0MMISSIONERS: Gt1GLIELM0, MACIAS, MUNOZ logs on a daily basis. The logs will provide descriptions of the daily burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate 4) In the event that significant Native American historical resources, as activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any treatment plan shall be created. The. project applicant shall consult defined by CEQA(as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance NOES'- COMMISSIONERS cultural materials identified. In addition, the monitor(s)will be required with the Tribe(s) regarding avoidance of all cemetery sites. Once cannot be ensured, an SOI-qualified archaeologist shall be retained to provide insurance certificates, including liability insurance, for any complete, a final report of all activities are to be submitted to the to develop a cultural resources Treatment Plan,. as well as a ABSENT- COMMISSIONERS- OAXACA. WIMBERLY archaeological resource(s) encountered during grading and NAHC. The Tribe(s) do NOT authorize any scientific study or the Discovery and Monitoring Plan, the drafts of which_ shall be provided excavation activities pertinent to the provisions outlined in the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. to the SMBMI for review and comment. ABSTAIN. COMMISSf�ONERS: California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code Division 13, and Section 21083.2 (a) through (k). The on-site 3) In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered All in-field investigations, assessments, and/or data recovery enacted monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find pursuant to the finalized Treatment Plan shall be monitored' by a activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist $MBMI Tribal Participant(s). Monitor have indicated that the site has a low potential for meeting Secretary of Interior standards, shall be hired to assess the a DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE CITY APPROVED: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PRECISE GRADING PLANS TRACT NO. 19917 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL v�DfESS/ON DESIGN RECOMMENDED Fs9 �c AU DAVID EVANS Q c� '° m ANDASSOCIATES INC. Lu No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET yt * Ontario California 91764 16 OF 17 qTF OF CpL�F CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 69 2020 FILE NO 3t.�.1 r ;n � t ti_ _ PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT �( SUBTT19917 AND VAR DRC2018-00556—CASTILLO SUBTT19917 AND VAR DRC2018-00566—CASTiLLO August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 Page 2 Page 3 r � _ PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION. B. Variance D 018 6: applicant submitted a Variance to allow the construction of n ce C2 -OD The r - REPORT - noise attenuating walls along the south, and portions of the east perimeter of the proposed STAFF,REP J _ The proposed project is located directly north of the Foothill Freeway(SR-210), south of Tract subdivision that will be in excess of 6 feet.in height(Exhibit D). Noise attenuation walls are NOTE: THE STAFF REPORT WAS GIVEN AS IS FROM THE CITY 18708(a 7-lot subdivision). of Tract 18 l22(a 76-lot subdivision currently under construction}, identified as the principal means for mitigating noise impacts generated by traffic on the OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA - PUBLIC RECORDS SITE August 8, 2018 = _ and west of East Etiwanda Creek and the San Sevaine Flood Control Basin (Exhibit B). The Foothill Freeway (SR 210), according to the noise study prepared by Eilar Associates on a 4 overall site is 7.17 acres, with an east-west dimension of approximately 330 feet and a north- May 31, 2018. Section 17'48.050(C) of the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code �� Chairman and Members of the annrnJ Cornmissign c Identifies that the maximum height of walls permitted'in residential districts- �� ___. _ south dimension of approximately 940 feet. The site is adjacent to existing vacant, residential, tri is is 6 fast The FROM Candyce 13urnetl, City Planner n '� and utility corridor land uses to the north,south,east,and west as indicated in the following table. proposed walls will be approximately 12 to 13.7 feet above the pad elevations of the iota adjoining the walls as seen from the interior of the subdivision. Depending on the location, Land Use General Plan Zoningsome walls will be constructed over retaining walls, i.e. a combination wall. Therefore, as INITIATED Tom Grahn, Associate Planner = TAL VeryLow VL Residential seen from the outside the subdivision, L SUBJECT: SUBTT19917NCASTILLOEArequesttoAND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ( ) the overall height of the walls will appear greater. Site Vacant Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda The general area where the walls will be highest is near the southeast comer of the y „ csubdivide Spa acres into"1c lots in the L Specific Plan subdivision at Lot 10 where the wall, as seen from the freeway, will be approximately 23 - .Very Low(VL) Residential`District of the Etiwanda.Specific Plan; located north � �� Very Low(VL} Residential That high. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings, which l g , are - of the-210 Freeway and east of East',Avenue` at the easterly`extension of .: North Single-family residences Very Low Residential District of the Etiwanda required by the City's Development Code: ry Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive;'APN: 0226-102-30. Related Files: Variance Specific Plan DRC2018-00566. ,Staff has prepared,'a 'Mitigated Negative],Declaration, of,, Low(L) Residential in : Strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would environmental impacts for consideration': 7 -;} 210 Freeway and single- South family residences Low Residential District of the Etiwanda result in a difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship Inconsistent with the objectives of this ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND�1''VARIANCE DRC2018-00566 1 Specific Plan Code. CASTILLO - Are request ,1�;t, East Etiwanda Creek and the Open Space{OS) q to increase the wall height up to 23 feet for sound East San Sevaine Flood Control Flood ControVUtility Residential District of the �' The proposed walls are for noise attenuation purposes to reduce the exterior noise °a attenuation along.the south boundary and, a portion of the 'east"boundary,of �,� Basin Corridor levels at lots along the Etiwanda Specific Plan g perimeter of me proposed subdivision. The height of the walls is proposed Tentative Tract�19917,(a request to subdivide 7.17 acres into 10 lots �� � - Very Law(VL)Residential necessary to mitigate the noise Impacts to a level that is-less than 65 dBA Community Noise in the Very Low(VL)'Residential'Dislrict�of the Etiwanda Specific Plan), located r'� Vacant and Single-family north of the 210 Freewa and east of E West VeryLow Residential District of the Etiwanda Equivalent Level(CNEL)as specified in the Development Code.,If the walls were limited to y ast`Avenue at ilia easteriy extension of LL residences S ecitic Plan 6 feet as.specked in the Code, or if the walls were absent altogether, the exterior noise Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APN:,0226-102-30,,-Related`Files: Tentative � .�j levels would not comply with the Code,r P Y nor be consistent with Public Health and Safety x t rc� , Tract Map SUBTT199171-Staff has prepare Mitigsated;Negative,Declaration tl - of environmental impacts for consideration - ANALYSIS: policies relating to noise(Goal.PS-13 of the General Plan).There is no practical alternative _ to walls that will achieve the desired noise attenuation. d i �� RECOMMENDATION: s �'. j A. Tentative TractMa SUB 19917: The proposed project involves the subdivision of a 7.17 acre parcel into 10 lots for future residential development (Exhibit G). EL>1ojog: There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or condi#ions applicable to 1 , Development/construction of the Names following the subdivision of the property will be b- Planning Commisslon tak('tJollowin l p l� Y Y the property involved or to the intended use of the properly that do not apply generally to 3 = r n , others,as it is not the intent of the a licant to do so themselves. Theproject site is located PP , other properties In the same zone. Staff recommends the - a ' within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), which Adopt the Mtttgsted Negative Declaration fvr �oject��`�a4itl� - `' permits a maximum of 2 dwelling units per acre,with an average lot size of 25 00D square a : TheProject site is a the ill -L� located approximately 150 feet north of Footh Freeway Approve- Tentative'TracC'Map SUBTT19917 y � -� -�vL feet, and a minimum net lot size of 20,000 square feet Lots within the subdivision range In (SR-210}.As a result,it is exposed to noise generated b traffic the - o and�`Va arj-noet�it��j 0iiirough to � size from 23,276 square feet to 26,557 square feet with an average lot size o 9 Y t is generally not present y . �',, z q g f 25,078 square � 7' - _ solutions with Conditions of Approves„ ,. L q are near other residential properties [n. the City that are screened by existing development ad ption of the attached Re m Lam, H feet,which slightly exceeds the required 25,000 square foot minimum average lot size. The and/or sufficiently distant from these principal noise sources that noise ,impacts are £ ° ' s project density will be 1.77 dwelling units per acre. The depth of each lot wilt be at feast 200 negligible. PROJECT REVIEW BACKGROUND t feet, and the width of each lot will most the required 90-foot dimension. All of the lots will The ,proposedi -project was originally'--scheduled be conventional, i.e. rectangular in shape, which will allow conventional house plotting. `e P 1 °^fob Planning�.,;Commissionl;consideration.71,on 1' Access p 9 Findina: Stnct or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would March 9, 2016.-Dunng circulation of the Initial Study/Mitlgated Negative Declaration(IS/MND)fon to the proposed subdivision will occur through the extension of two streets(Copley deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed b the owners of other proper. that meeting the City received comments from the San�Be�nardlno county.'Department of Publid' " - Drive and Wilshire Drive)from within the subdivision to the west. The project complies with zone. Y P parties in the same `. all applicable development standards as described-in Figure 5-2 of the ESP and the Rancho Works (SBCDPW) and the California Department of Fish and,Wildlife;(CDFIIN). Both agencies) , raised uestions that required further environmental'study original ve sionvThe Mnd recirculation old<; z Cucamonga Development Code. Fac: The purpose of the walls is to attenuate traffic noise. The exterior noise levels q q generated by traffic exceed the maximum limits established by the Development Code and the IS/MND, which was revised significantly fro arch 9,`2016 eta As the subject property is located within the report (Exhibit A),recommended the Planning,Commission continue' the applications to, an,l, j p p Y Equestrian Overlay, each lot will have a would negatively affect a future homeowner's ability to enjoy and use the outdoor areas of p dedicated corral area of 12 feet by 48 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be their uns ecrfieddate:-The Commission this recommendation and;continu"ed;the applications Property in the absence of these walls. Furthermore, the effectiveness of noise accordingly:: 1 provided along the rear of each lot per Section 5.25.500 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. attenuating materials used in the construction of the homes is augmented by the presence _ y 77) E E1-->:2 Pg3 z � , .� 1-E2 Pg2 ' l= Po fJ 5 1 , PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMiSSiON STAFF REPORTSUBTT19917 AND VAR DRC2018-00566—CASTILLO SUBTT19911 AND VAR DRC2018-00566—CASTILLO SUBTT19917 AND VAR DRC2018-00566--CASTILLO August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 August 8, 2018 Page 6 Page 4• Page,5 of the noise attenuating perimeter wall.. The absence of the wall would .reduce the determination for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. The notices were mailed on EXHIBITS: effectiveness of noise mitigation measures and expose the.occupants of the homes to September 10, 2015 and provided for a 30-day comment period ending on Exhibit A - Planning Commission Staff Report dated March 9, 2016. elevated interior noise.. October 12, 2015. No response to.the.Tribal Consultation Request was received. Exhibit B - Site Utilization Map Exhibit C - Tentative Tract Map Finding: The granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege H. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Exhibit D - Conceptual Grading Plan inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone: and the City's local CEQA Guidelines,City staff prepared an Initial Study(1S)of.the potential Exhibit E - Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan environmental effects of the project(Exhibit H). Based on the findings contained in that IS, Exhibit F - Design Review Committee Action dated August 4, 2015 Ekt; Throughout the City, the Foothill Freeway(SR-210)corridor is adjacent to numerous City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures related to Aesthetics, Exhibit G - Trails Advisory Committee Action dated September 9, 2015 residential properties.Traffic noise impacts along the corridor must be mitigated to levels as Agricultural Resources,Air Quality, Biological Resources,Cultural Resources,Geology and Exhibit H - Initial Study(Parts 1, 11 $ lit) described in the Development Code and consistent with the General Plan. The freeway Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions,Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise,and Tribal Cultural Draft Resolution of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 Corridor abuts various residential zoning districts including the Very Low (VL) Residential Resources there would be no.substantial evidence that the project would have a significant Draft Resolution of Approval for Variance DRC2018-00566 District. Walls of this height or similar are common along:the freeway comdor for noise effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration attenuation purposes where residential properties are adjacent to the freeway. (MND)was prepared.Thereafter,'the City staff provided public notice of the public comment CB:TG/ss period and of the intent to.adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, As noted above, an Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or Initial-Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND)was circulated prior to the Planning welfare,or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity:, Commission public hearing on March 9, 2016.The City received comments from ,the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works(SBCDPW) and the California Department fl9t The height of the wall as seen.from the Foothill Freeway(SR 210)will be similar to of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW).: Both agencies raised questions that required further the height of other noise attenuation walls along the freeway corridor within the City. This environmental study, and the revision and recirculation of the iS/MND. The IS/MND was wall will be constructed per the decorative:design established by Caltrans, consistent with revised significantly as requested and now also Includes revised discussion and additional the design of the existing sound attenuation wall to,the east and will not be detrimental to mitigations related -to noise impacts. No additional comments have been received In ,the public health, safety,or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in response to this recirculated environmental document.-A Mitigation Monitoring Program has the-vicinity.. also been prepared to ensure Implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation • C. Neighborhood Meeting: One neighborhood meeting was held to obtain input and comments measures'for the project. from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the site.The meeting was FISCAL IMPACT: held at.Summit Intermediate School°located at 5959 East Avenue on November 17, 2015. No members of the public attended the scheduled neighborhood :meeting and no public The project site currently Is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is comments were submitted.in advance of the meeting. shared with the City.The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's.annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will D. De an Review Committed: The Design Review Committee (Fletcher, Oaxaca, and be responsible for paying one-time impact fees.These fees are Intended to address the increased Granger) reviewed the project on August 4,2015 and recommended approval of the demand for City services due to the proposed project.The following types of services that these CITY proposed subdivision to the Planning Commission. As the project does not include the Impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, DESCRIPTION OF REVISION DATE APPROVED: construction of houses, the architecture of the houses for this subdivision will be subject to drainage infrastructure, animal services, police,parks,and community and recreation services. review and action by the Committee and the Planning Commission at a later date following the submittal of a Design Review appllcation. COUNCIL GOAL(S)ADDRESSED: CITY OF RANCHO C U CA M O N G A E. Technical Rey%X! Cormittee: The Technical Review Committee reviewed the project on Although a specific current City Council goal does not apply to the project,the project is consistent PRECISE GRADING PLANS August 4, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed dubdiv[sibn to the Planning With the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code.The Commission. proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to TRACT N 0. 19917 serving local needs and promoting complementary development. F. Trails Advi=y Committee: The Trails Advisory Committee reviewed the project on September 9, 2015 and recommended approval of the proposed stbdivision to the Planning CORRESPONDENCE:. Commission. MITIGATION MEASURES • This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland G. Tribal Consultation:. As required by Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), the City submitted Tribal Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper,the property was posted, and notices were mailed to all property Consultation Requests to the Gabrieleno sand of•Mission Indians, Gabdeleno/Tongva owners within a 660 foot radius of the project site. No comments we're received in response to Nation, Gabrieieno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, San Manual Band of these notifications. Q�O Mission Indians, and Sobvba Band of Lulseno Indians following a completeness FESS/ON�� q< DESIGN RECOMMENDED OD CF�9 ) AU DAVID EVANS Q 6 Z' rn m ANDASSOCIATES INC.E1--E2 Pg4 E1-E2 Pg5 E1-E2P 9 No.87222 DRAWN 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd,Suite 250 O SHEET * * Ontario California 91764 17 OF 17 J� HIV 1�- �Q' q�F OF CpOZ CHECKED R.C.E. NO 87222 DRAWING NO. AC DATE 12 09 020 FILE NO Landscape Dynamics URBAN I ECOSYSTEM I SOLUTIONS Londscope Architecture-Consulfing Wafer Management Certified Arboriculture (951)264-4837 15'wide Equeslrian 15'wide Equestrian Easement 15'wide Equestrian Easement Easamen I t ^ — — — — — - - — — — — — - - — — — — — - - — — — - - - — — — — — — — .r pr + • . .•.. r.,w:■ r wv' .n ..11... •.v••- r f w. F f...n.. a .t .r..y. .r .n:•' •i r s • ! A � :i .i •",L w;l9' ..:r .t •4.if x ti:+•'�' r' :�:r^,i' +!. �• '4 :A.:r".1' DESIGN P D]ECT GE .r. ,. •� +- .r..�■ a•.t '.5M �d'4•Y .•1• .�.•vr'1 ..i. ti::i'�:ti t ^+• �" �'. '!' �•ti. ti •rr•'w' `�'i` SSG' lr+:.. .r' r. '•r..r '� Za„'l � ���. .3 I" R P7ANA R 7r •T• rY' rn.....� •i' `.5V y`•?.� {• :rF.�• 'r...�•wi• 7 � .d• `.S`•'w A a.+L .uy. .\` �. ••`i, •r v• f i.•t tr ,� � ;�""A 'r;7. ��. , Y'i'. i�•�4• °:t� '�•' �. �..�:.f. y, ..,r.. :=l' t+ } 1� •�xy' 3 I i. v.. I ..,r .►. :i`• 'R• ..rx r. 'w 1-� '.t Y"p` r `..s r. r �,`,•..•a. � a7_„i ra." .:�••. v i.1,. ti F'. .�...�j •,�i�.`� .'�:.r.,Y I .i.. ■ .r :•�r�` ,• r.raw. ... .i......ti +c '�" ..• • 7.�• ~;� i.� 1 r :i•' a L •S •A ; S T {' S V 1• L ,j Y• i •i �L •'V•..y ti.� •YYwy.w Y�"•' •i''S. i"s' y.7! • N•li�'t '�r.' •► '�w�pr Y �} }'. h '!, Y�. ti7•\ •�!r• 'If R w V{! •�{' '4 •1 'S•w.Y"•. i� � ti,'F •yi •ti' •� 'tii \.:i• 1 �•Y:.i�•1 •�r +:y ."� ry' ,'�. .'�" '7~w �'a• 'r ,..4+'�ti •'.w K .•w'r+r'.r'•r '}..`w•''IC.• •r•'.ar••i •.• 3:.J aw: � .Fc•h a:+ } „+" ix•?r. 'T'i 4+ r !. �•'y: 'v :a k h.. "S' ...: '�h .r 7 1. ♦ �r.,•�"', 1 t ►'.ry .S" �"►a }• is } �i� .r v .� .. •..('.'.. s .{ .�'vrS.. .,•i! 'a:: .� $.r",• • .:•i .a s 'S.' r.s , .t , r' r ZQII r 'i .r� :rF 1` i. i r• � '..`.r.t', r y :.iy. .a er� l..•+•a •, •' A ••,? a .+r 5 } i' F`.•� .ti ::+• .r 1..•'•`Y• .C. v 'V .y •ti '?+. v' G Q i..w ..�•!• r r. '>.;.'•: +. 'y ■ .�'. v •;.r• gin:,.••. !, 's. r'•' ! .F .ti•S:�ti y r.. ..:"y.: �, :�. v�w',k ■t.c � ti,:r•+• •"#.:�. • .. :hy �...:;. �" � 4•ri, "ti� ::• .ti .,M�r, 7. .R'+i ti+ `.,:•:7r, i i"a'"Jr, � •{ 'L �.�;•. .•�'•.2�'L.• •�,w .y,r.»•:" � .+��,1� . vd•,.� L n.•:.•.u;,". r :::i'•'C, a'.r•a.e'ti •. r' `e.ar ..., I •� ■ .a T:r'••,1 z ,�'; .a.R{'v,r•.e`.�. ''t.w••t Y. Y 1..ur�^„e;t•i i '�.l��'.�• I -.';��,. �7�: ,��, - •.k•. .� •.},•. �• r ,w' :.R;�� �?y4'.. •r `:r.. r•,•s:�lry gregzollr�landscapedynamics.net •�': _ $emen -*• • t a• 'High I ••-'�` - ---------- -t -C-High ,ivkfi � I 951 264-4 839$,a"High 5'w de Drama a-fl x rative! $w Drainage Deorative❑@CtlrgtlVe Corral Area a EaseeniMasonry Wall 24 x 24' Masonry WaUMasonry Wall 41%, - ■*•+a ' r +• + .._ _ Cl Area . • • k�: • �`" • • • • L 5'wide brain 24'x 24' ana re a •r j _■a■•• I REVISION$ BY a: 24 x 24 f ■ + a • • �� Corral Area J \\ � Corral Area 1 �_: J ■ ♦ • Easementr r r r• • r \.. q"�` �I rn ;; aaY ! i \ � ■+ � * • I I I I I I I I r I `��` `\� 1 �Y rQI .yiA: /\ .-- \ a • - --- - ---- ------ -- - -L---------------- ----- -- ---I--- -- - + ►' \ \�'`�.. ,• Lbt B - ,I-- , 'i r I_{7t`'1 ; • I �' Plan 2A r . . + !r t • 6'-0'High Decorative 9'-W Hlgh Decorative \ P#an 2A I 4.938 SF a L Masonry Wall Masonry Wall r • ■ ` I ■ �'''" r \ '4,938 SF.... .I 24'x24' I — ',n a ♦ R B'-W'Hlgh Decorative Corral Area \ \ +• Masonry Wall • s I \.•\. `,\. r.-- \ NO - ------ I r a • I I cV I I I ti t I p * *• + _ . } r-- >$++ 1 rt • r • r •■r■►• r as I I I I I I 1 I ■ I �'• I 212.39' • + . + + dt rr * r , I I I I ■� I ' ' ' 237.5r �7A�a ------------- - rl r r a r aw 4P I I I I I I I r I B'-0"High a N� \�\ \ \\ rl ' ♦ r • - _T.---------------1__geesrative------- �•, ' \ r +r . • a • ■ I Masonry Wall Lc \\ \\\: r r • r r +a I ! i I I ' i �T a - I \ � \ \ \\�\ I al, I •r. \ '\ '\ ■ r l\ Lot 7 \ \\\ Lot Lot 4 Lot 2 \ ' Plan 2C':\ . : \ � .. pion 3D .�\ Pion 2B Plan 1A r s' ` r r ■ r r �� 4.938 SF \ \`•5,674 SF' 4.938 SF,' .� , .� • 4.672 SF .:\� 24'x 24' ra�C. \\ \' \�. ♦ L■ � \ \�k. \ \, \ 'a .� I • • ■ • • I Corral Area .,r• � 5' V i �\�..:'<.� I'\ \:� I I � .\• .\\��.>. -\ I a.; � I � • + ■ . a i • ___ \\•`, I p[y05 CAA 531 Mi `•.. .. `. \.. \ ` ----- - - ---- ----- ---------- - - -- - - _�: 5ti orp Pao Cyr •�. •.' — B'-0"High E e ratve a a a • • a a r • ■ a a ~ \` - \ I�If \\,\ \ �\: r. I a ■ ■ • a • �'r'' I r r� . I Mason Wall . a r \ I •\ I I \ ,\ \� .�\�\ \.\ I + ■ T• . f ^%% - Ali ■ ■+r•rarr+aa■r•a■•■' ry •` r \ \ \ --- - - I � I t� 209.89' r © ■ r r■ • r \� r • • r + 238,714 k s '. ``• - [ • . ■ r . • • ♦ r r r r� ■ r . . I Ar 6'-0'High �': Jw976.20,9 •�.�• 1-----'------------ r ■ . . ± r r r r r r r -- : ; � .. . r ;� r�■ • ■ ■ r ■ ■ ■ r r . r • ♦ r . r • ♦ . • r r r ------- -------------------------------i)}CC6ra-tIVB I v{:r, ■ r • . • r ■ r r • r • r r r ■ ■ r • r ■ r ■ r • r I + Masonry Wa11 ii I rE F `� r • r • r •'r r r • . r . r • r a r • . r ■ • r r . • a I OF 1 24'x24' CAL +r;s Corral Area � r a a ■ r� r.r r� ■ � a� r • r r • + r r ■ . r r ■ r * • I ;: ptr \.\ / ■, , r r . . r r r • . . . r ■ r r ■ • r • . ■ r r ;\, 24'x 24' .+ :Ar; .'�'�\ • • • ■ ■a■■ ■ a • r ■ r a • a r a a r ■ r r r • r r .' +' Corral Area ••• a r.�•.d� ,\ \ • ► • r� �• c. r ■ ■ •n.r►- '• •r a ♦ ■ 91. 'r • a r?2 r r r ■ +. ; r • \ `• \ � •` /J a+' �Yr;4" \\�\ \ r r r r • r r r:. r • r n r. r;. :� y a r r :.r • .i r r a r r ■r a s a r r r ■ Lot t r _ -_..._._.. Plan 3C �. 6'-l7"High Decorative ` Plan 1 Ei' .. 5.674 SF 1 Masonry Wall i r r ♦ r ■;• . r r . ■r .y ■ ■r r r 4r6 2 SF` . r�r� • -— Street"A,r r / �.D.,Hlgn r r r . fir. , r r ■ r ■ r r r ■ r �,,` � I O9Cordfi're fi n,a - r \. \�,�\\ r ■ a r ■ ■ r r r r r r \ I Masonry Wall ■ ■ r • ■ r .....i % r r ■ r . r r • r . r r Z M.is r r r r r. r r r ■ r r.. ■ . r ■ ■ ■ V-0"High ;! w r . i . . , - - - - - .-+-+�+-+- -• "'-r- r -------- -- - -- ----------- r. ------------- - e • ► • r r r R, . • • • y� r ■ ■ • r + +.. r. r + ,, r. • Masonry Wall � 2&5.48' ■ • ■ r ■ • , ■ Y a r 1r ♦ r r r r rY I L - - - - - - •- - - - -- - - - . — - - - - — - - - - - J CL s'wide Community +i W Easement •— a o 20 40 so V V y y y Landscape Area Q� _ PLANT LEGEND y II Z *Project lies within "VHFHSZ"and utilizes RCFPD Landscaping Guidelines for selection and spacing. �.•r Equestrian Easement Scale I e = 4o U z Latin Name y• �— co J NOTE:PLANT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS Common Name Container WUCOLS Plant Size Q ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FULL VIGOROUS&HEALTHY U Q NURSERY STOCK-INCLUDING THE TOP OF PLANT AND THE ROOT TREES �_ SYSTEM. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2004) CANOPY SHADE TREE:TBD LJCL THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE CONTACTED REGARDING Alternating evergreenldeciduous with street trees W ALL PLANT MATERIALS AS THEY ARRIVE ON-SITE, PRIOR TO THEIR V INSTALLATION, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE '' ACCENT TREE:TBD Z PLANT MATERIALS FOR INSTALLATION ON-SITE OR SHALL BE SENT r 0 REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF SAME. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT UNACCEPTABLE PLANT BRACHYCHITON acerifolius MATERIALS. r AUSTRALIAN FLAME TREE 15 Gallon Moderate 60'TALL,30'WIDE J 0 r Y. _ • E/W STREETTREE, Deciduous, 50'o.c.per RCFPD UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS FOR PLANTS IN GENERAL: KOELREUTERIA bipinata PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE THE INCORRECT SPECIES. CHINESE FLAME TREE 15 Gallon Moderate 30'TALL&WIDE PLANTS MATERIALS WITH APPARENT FUNGAL DISEASE(MILDEW, EIW STREET TREE, Deciduous, 60'o.c,per RCFPD RUST,BLACK-SPOT, ETC.), PLANTS THAT ARE DEFOLIATED DUE TO STRESS OR DISEASE.FOLIAGE THAT IS CHLOROTIC,WIND OR FROST MAGNOLIA grandiflora `Majestic Beauty' BURNED,OR IN ANY OTHER WAY DAMAGED. - • MAJESTIC BEAUTY SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 15 Gallon Moderate 35-40'TALL, 15-20'WIDE ' • NIS STREET TREE, Evergreen,40'o.c. per RCFPD UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS FOR ROOT SYSTEMS: PLANTS WITH EXPOSED ROOTS,GIRDLED ROOTS,OVERGROWN OR FOUNDATION SHRUBS UNDERSIZED ROOT SYSTEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED UNACCEPTABLE. - BUXUSjaponica 'Green Beauty' 1 Galion Moderate 4'TALL&WIDE GROUNDCOVERS TREE SELECTION: LLJ JAPANESE BOXWOOD TREES ARE REQUIRED TO STAND ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT THE CERASTIUM tomentosum 1 Gallon Moderate 6%1'TALL&WIDE SUPPORT OF THE NURSERY STAKE. TREES MUST ALSO BE FREE OF o DURRANTA errecta 'Sweet Memories' 15 Gallon Moderate 8'TALL, 4'WIDE ^' SNOW IN SUMMER 1 FT D.C. DISEASE, INFESTATIONS, SIGNS OF HEAVY PRUNING WITHIN THE s SWEET MEMORIES PURPLE SKYFLOWER CANOPY, BROKEN PRIMARY LIMBS OR LEADERS, AND DAMAGE. COTONEASTER dommeri'Eichholz' 1 Gallon Low 1'TALL,8' WIDE NEW TREES PLANTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ARE TO BE `� PODOCARPUS macrophyllus 15 Gallon Moderate 15'TALL, HEDGED EICHHOLZ COTONEASTER 4FT O.C. INSTALLED PER THE DETAIL BELOW. THE TREE PIT IS TO BE YEW PODOCARPUS EXCAVATED TO MEASURE 3 X ROOT BALL AT THE FINISH GRADE LANTANA sellowiano 'Monswee' 1 Gallon Low V TALL, 3'WIDE SURFACE AND BE TAPERED TO ROOT BALL WIDTH AT PIT BOTTOM. ACCENT SHRUBS LAVENDER SWIRL TRAILING LANTANA DO NOT OVER-EXCAVATE THE TREE PIT DEPTH. AFTER TREE PLACEMENT THE TREE PIT IS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN NATIVE ALOE striata 1 Gallon Moderate 3'TALL,2' WIDE SOIL ONLY, TREES ARE TO BE TRIPLE STAKE AS SHOWN ON DETAILS. D CORAL ALOE MYOPORUM parvifolium'Pink' 1 Gallon Law 1'TALL, 6'WIDE PINK AUSTRALIAN RACER ROOT BARRIER: CAESALPINIA pulcherrima 1 Gallon Low 8'TALL&WIDE USE LINEAL ROOT BARRIER WHEN TREE IS WITHIN 5' MIN. DISTANCE RED BIRD OF PARADISE ��{i�f r�1�r��i OPHIOPOGON japonicas 1 Gallon Moderate 1'TALL, 1'WIDE ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE AREAS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE CALLISTEMON'Little Jahn' 1 Gallon Law 5'TALL,3'WIDE ti' �•'rr;iri'�r MONDO GRASS INSTALLED IN SHEETS PARALLEL WITH HARDSCAPE WI TOP EDGE 0 DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH P �' DlufrED BY PLACED 1" BELOW GRADE. ROOT BARRIER SHALL EXTEND THE EXPECTED LENGTH OF TREE CANOPY AS SHOWN PER PLAN. DWARF x skan OCK 1 Gallon Law 24 TALL,4-5'WIDE �PZ i s DWARF PINK ROCKROSE CHECKED BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED AT A SLIGHT ANGLE {75°) WITH BASE OF BARRIER DIRECTED UNDER HARDSCAPE&AWAY FROM TREE. FESTUCA glauca 'ELIJAH BLUE' 1 Gallon Moderate 8-12"TALL&WIDE All planters to receive 318"-314"Copper Canyon decorative gravel mulch. V PZ ° ELIJAH BLUE FESCUE DArr ROCK MULCH 6'2�J2V 1 ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A 7 LAYER OF 318"ROCK LANTANA camera'Gold Mound' 1 Gallon Low 3'TALL&WIDE V OVER FILTER FABRIC. GOLD MOUND LANTANA 5L+� As Doted ]O6 Na 0326-Rancho 10 SI•EE7 I -:� (Two) SHEkTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7Tb M a"11"0- - - - - - - � 109.87' 7. 4. r. w r• + •r •� +• +.•i• rr'. •1• w _ Landscape Dynamics s` (D I. ;t Q (6 I URBAN I ECOSYSTEM I SOLUTIONS ,• ; =r' a) L - - -- 4J N Q - - --- - _ x m > •� Landscape Architecture-Consul5ng ti Q J co (� I Water Management Certified Arboriculture r N �} � x i O D (951}264-4839 I r o a Q@ cn ;Cu r cfl ❑ IE N U 2 0 0 .„ ZD ❑ 2 ❑ �+ DESIGN RROJECT MANAGER p I Greg Zell Co 0 2! I v � gregzollGlandscapedynamics.net E (951) 264-4839 •7 s'•,�� ~ ;.�� I— L'Vf REVISIONS BY 00 �'. •f••� �� I I I I I CD 00 CV 2 >` co aCN / \\ j co � /' C'r7 I Boa I co 00 IN 0 CO •• � 177 s nno7B.�19 P r i / in W I .l g 5 73 2 23 I r r• 23 %3 23 23 /. 23 3 I { s s ��0 fl as 2 2)0 23s I Z 51 5 '` — + •- MT 2 �= L � � 5 v, .J - - - - 4 - J 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 y\. •:.':, ❑ 4 a r f , LLJ % 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 y a 0 4— . 40 9 'r'• • •+'•- v+ �J \ ' `-' i i�•8G � � � 2 2 5 , 5 5 ...� .- - - 2 2 Z o 49 _ ❑ nn ii W Q � '� H PLANT LEGEND ;a ❑ a *Project ties within"VHFHSZ" and utilizes RCFPD Landscaping Guidelines for selection and spacing. ❑ 10 20 40 W U � 0 Latin Name — � — � NOTE:PLANT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS �.} Common Name Container WUCOLS Plant Size r�n ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FULL VIGOROUS&HEALTHY Scale �} �} — L V' � � � NURSERY STOCK-INCLUDING THE TOP OF PLANT AND THE ROOT TREES I V J SYSTEM. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL MEET THE CURRENT AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK(ANSI Z60.1-2404) CANOPY SHADE TREE:TBD U THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE CONTACTED REGARDING Alternating evergreen/deciduous with street trees ALL PLANT MATERIALS AS THEY ARRIVE ON-SITE, PRIOR TO THEIR ' INSTALLATION. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE71� ACCENT TREE:TBD PLANT MATERIALS FOR INSTALLATION ON-SITE OR SHALL BE SENT REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF SAME. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT UNACCEPTABLE PLANT BRACHYCHITON acerifolius MATERIALS, 49 • A.U'STRALIAN FLAME TREE 15 Gallon Moderate 60'TALL,30'WIDE • EIW STREET TREE, Deciduous,50'c.c.per RCFPD UNACCEPTABLE CONDITIONS FOR PLANTS IN GENERAL. PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE THE INCORRECT SPECIES. OELREUTERIA bipinata PLANTS MATERIALS WITH APPARENT FUNGAL DISEASE (MILDEW, CHINESE FLAME TREE 15 Gallon Moderate 30'TALL&WIDE RUST,BLACK-SPOT, ETC.). PLANTS THAT ARE DEFOLIATED DUE TO EIW STREET TREE. Deciduous,60'o.c. per RCFPD STRESS OR DISEASE.FOLIAGE THAT IS CHLOROTIC, WIND OR FROST BURNED,OR IN ANY OTHER WAY DAMAGED, MAGNOLIA grandiflorq'MajestiC Beauty' • • MAJESTIC BEAUTY SOUTHERN MAGNOLIA 15 Gallon Moderate 35-40'TALL, 15-20'WIDE UNACCEPTABLE CONDITION5 FOR ROOT SYSTEMS: NIS STREET TREE, Evergreen, 40'o.c.per RCFPD PLANTS WITH EXPOSED ROOTS,GIRDLED ROOTS,OVERGROWN OR UNDERSIZED ROOT SYSTEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED UNACCEPTABLE. FOUNDATION SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS " CERASTIUM lomentosum 1 Gallon Moderate 6"-l'TALL& WIDE TREE SELECTION: � '�T�;'. = BUXUS japonica'Green Beauty' 1 Gallon Moderate 4'TALL& WIDE ; TREES ARE REQUIRED TO STAND ON THEIR OWN WITHOUT THE JAPANESE BOXWOOD `. SNOW IN SUMMER 1 FT O.C. SUPPORT OF THE NURSERY STAKE. TREES MUST ALSO BE FREE OF ' DISEASE, INFESTATIONS, SIGNS OF HEAVY PRUNING WITHIN THE '� � DURRANTA errecta'Sweet Memories' 15 Gallon Moderate 8'TALL,4'WIDE l' 7 COTONEASTER dammeri'Eichholi 1 Gallon Low 1'TALL,8'WIDE CANOPY, BROKEN PRIMARY LIMBS OR LEADERS, AND DAMAGE. SWEEP MEMORIES PURPLE SKYFLOWER / / EICHHOLZ COTONEASTER 4�O.C. NEW TREES PLANTED WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA ARE TO BE 2s PODOCARPUS macrophyllus 15 Gallon Moderate 15'TALL,HEDGED INSTALLED PER THE DETAIL BELOW. THE TREE PIT IS TO BE YEW PODOCARPUS X LANTANA sellowiana 'Monswee' 1 Gallon Low 1'TALL,3'WIDE EXCAVATED TO MEASURE 3 X ROOT BALL AT THE FINISH GRADE - ; LAVENDER SWIRL TRAILING LANTANA SURFACE AND BE TAPERED TO ROOT BALL WIDTH AT PIT BOTTOM, ACCENT SHRUBS DRAFTED BY DO NOT OVER-EXCAVATE THE TREE PIT DEPTH. AFTER TREE MYOPORUM parvifoium'Pink' 1 Gallon ow 1'TALL, 6'WlDE GPL PLACEMENT THE TREE PIT IS TO BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN NATIVE ALOE striata 1 Gallon Moderate 3'TALL,2'WIDE PINK AUSTRALIAN RACER CHECKED SOIL ONLY. TREES ARE TO BE TRIPLE STAKE AS SHOWN ON DETAILS. E) CORAL ALOE OPHIOPOGON japonicus 1 Gallon Moderare l'TALL, 1' WIDE G PZ ROOT BARRIER: 4 CAESALPINIA pulcherrima 1 Gallon Law B'TALL&WIDE ' MONDO GRASS DAIF USE LINEAL ROOT BARRIER WHEN TREE IS WITHIN 5' MIN, DISTANCE _ RED BIRD OF PARADISE �,� 6 L 1 9 ADJACENT TO HARDSCAPE AREAS. ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE ' A V INSTALLED IN SHEETS PARALLEL WITH HARDSCAPE W1 TOP EDGE DWARTEMON'Little Jahn' 1 Gallon Low 5'TALL,3'WIDE y,,,t PLACED 1" BELOW GRADE. ROOT BARRIER SHALL EXTEND THE i DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH A5 Noted oted EXPECTED LENGTH OF TREE CANOPY AS SHOWN PER PLAN. CISTUS x skanbergil 1 Gallon Low 2-4'TALL,4-5' WIDE BARRIERS SHALL BE PLACED AT A SLIGHT ANGLE (750) WITH BASE ` Q DWARF PINK ROCKROSE j` All planters to receive 318"-314"Copper Canyon decorative gravel mulch. nn pp'aB N° OF BARRIER DIRECTED UNDER HARDSCAPE&AWAY FROM TREE. rl V32b-Rancho n G h Q 10 FFSTUCA glauca'ELIJAH BLUE' 1 Gallon Moderate 8-12"TALL&WIDE SHEET ROCK MULCH ELIJAH BLUE FESCUE ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A 2"LAYER OF 318"ROCK 4s (3) LANTANA camera'Gold Mound' 1 Gallon Law 3'TALL&WIDE 2 OVER FILTER FABRIC. GOLD MOUND LANTANA (Two) SHEETS Design Review Committee April 6, 2021 7:00 p.m. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APNs 0226-572-01 to -10. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is located at the east terminus of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive. These east-west streets were constructed as part of an unrelated subdivision (Tract 18122) to the west of the project site. On August 8, 2018, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 to subdivide a 7.17- acre lot into 10 lots for the future development of 10 single-family homes and Variance DRC2018-00566 to allow a wall height of up to 23 feet on the project's south boundary (parallel the 210 Freeway)for sound attenuation purposes. As part of the approved subdivision Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive will be extended to the east and a new north-south street (Echo Mountain Place) will be constructed to connect the two to form a loop. Over the last year, on-site grading has commenced, and the applicant has submitted the subject Design Review application for the construction of 10 single-family homes. The existing Land Use, General Plan, and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Residential District' North Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Residential District 210 Freeway San Bernardino County Flood n/a n/a South Control District Access Road Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (L) Residential Residential District East Etiwanda Creek and the San Flood Open Space (OS) East Sevaine Flood Control Basin Control/Utility District' Corridor West Single-Family Residential Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential Residential District 1 —Etiwanda Specific Plan Project Overview and Analysis: The applicant is proposing 3 architectural styles: Spanish, Italianate, and Craftsman. As demonstrated on the project plans, all homes appropriately DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2019-00558 - M&A HOLDINGS, INC April 6, 2021 Page 2 reflect the materials, textures, and design elements associated with the architectural style proposed. Houses proposed in the Spanish style feature S-tile roofs, white paint tones, arches, and wrought iron railings, while Craftsman style homes contain shingle/wood siding, a stone base, and exposed rafters. Italianate styled homes contain Mediterranean/Tuscan inspired elements, such as stone veneers, arched windows, and earth-toned colors. RCMC Section 17.122.010 requires at least 3 residences within the 10-unit development to be single-story homes. The applicant is proposing 3 single-story homes and 7 two-story homes, which complies with this requirement. Additionally, 3 distinct floor plans are proposed, which complies with the minimum of 3 separate floor plans required per RCMC Table 17.122.010-1. All homes comply with all applicable setback and height requirements as prescribed in the Very Low(VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Each lot will be separated by a 6-foot high decorative block wall fence on both sides, with a combination 3-foot decorative block wall and a 3-foot wrought iron fence/gate along the rear of each lot. All houses will have direct access to a 15-foot wide equestrian trail, running along the rear of all 10 lots. All front yards will be landscaped with a variety of drought-tolerant shrubs, groundcovers, and trees, in compliance with the City's residential landscape requirements per RCMC Section 17.56.070. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Director/ Planning Commission: x❑Recommend Approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend Approval with Modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. ❑Recommend Conditional Approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. El Recommend Denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Desiqn Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Michael Smith, Principal Planner RESOLUTION NO. 21-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00558, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 10 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SUBDIVISION (SUBTT19917) WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNS: 0226-572-01 TO -10 A. Recitals. 1. M&A Holdings, LLC filed an application for Design Review DRC2019-00558 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga noticed public hearing to consider the application. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to property located within the City; and b. The application applies to an approximately 7.17-acre site within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; and C. The properties to the north and west are within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District, and developed with single- family residences. The properties to the south (across the 210 Freeway) are located within the Low (L) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan and contains single-family residences. The property to the east is within the Open Space (OS) District, Etiwanda Specific Plan and contains a flood control channel/basin; and d. The proposed project consists of the construction of 10 single-family residences and ancillary site improvements; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-23 DR DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC May 12, 2021 Page 2 e. The project complies with all pertinent development standards related to building height, lot coverage, front/rear setbacks; and f. The project complies with the residential front yard landscaping requirements as prescribed in the Development Code; and g. The project is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 10-lot subdivision (SUBTT19917)that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2018; and h. The proposed single-family residences complies with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The architecture of each house will be consistent with the general design requirements outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby specifically finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Equestrian Overlay District and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to construct a single-family residence on each lot of a 10-lot subdivision (SUBTT19917), that was previously approved by the Planning Commission on August 8, 2018 for a total of 10 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential; and b. The proposed development, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant; the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The property is surrounded on three sides by single-family residential development; and C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the Equestrian Overlay District. The proposed development meets all standards outlined in the Development Code, the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the Equestrian Overlay District, as well as the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, the City adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 8, 2018 in connection with the City's approval of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no subsequent or supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is required in connection with subsequent discretionary approvals of the same project unless: (i) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-23 DR DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC May 12, 2021 Page 3 substantial changes are proposed to the project that indicate new or more severe impacts on the environment; (ii) substantial changes have occurred in the circumstances under which the project was previously reviewed that indicates new or more severe environmental impacts; or (iii) new important information shows the project will have new or more severe impacts than previously considered; or(iv) additional mitigation measures are now feasible to reduce impacts or different mitigation measures can be imposed to substantially reduce impacts. b. The Planning Commission finds, in connection with the Design Review DRC2019-00558, that substantial changes to the project or the circumstances surrounding the project have not occurred which would create new or more severe impacts than those evaluated in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Tentative Tract Map SUBTT19917 provided for the subdivision of approximately 7.17 acres into single-family 10 lots. Design Review DRC2019- 00558 provides for the construction of 10 single-family homes on those 10 previously approved single-family lots. Staff further finds that the project will not have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration, not have more severe effects than previously analyzed, and that additional or different mitigation measures are not required to reduce the impacts of the project to a level of less than significant. C. Based on these findings and all evidence in the record,the Planning Commission concurs with the staff determination that no additional environmental review is required pursuant to CEQA in connection with the City's consideration of the Design Review DRC2019-00558. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-23 DR DRC2019-00558 — M&A HOLDINGS, LLC May 12, 2021 Page 4 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2019-00558 Project Name: EDR- Design Review for 10 Single-Family Homes Location: 19917 TRACT - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 2. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 3. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/4/2021 Project#: DRC2019-00558 Project Name: EDR- Design Review for 10 Single-Family Homes Location: 19917 TRACT - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 5. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval (such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first unit in the subdivision) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 6. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code This requirement shall be in addition to any required street trees and slope planting. 7. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 8. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 9. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 10. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 11. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/4/2021 Page 2 of 4 Project#: DRC2019-00558 Project Name: EDR- Design Review for 10 Single-Family Homes Location: 19917 TRACT - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. 13. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 14. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 15. Occupancy of the facilities shall not commence until such time as all California Building Code and State Fire Marshal regulations have been complied with. Prior to occupancy, plans shall be submitted to the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Building and Safety Services Department to show compliance. The buildings shall be inspected for compliance and final acceptance granted prior to occupancy. 16. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 17. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 18. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 19. Where rock cobble is used, it shall be real river rock. Other stone veneers may be manufactured products. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The project shall comply with the conditions of approval for SUBTT19917. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/4/2021 Page 3 of 4 Project#: DRC2019-00558 Project Name: EDR- Design Review for 10 Single-Family Homes Location: 19917 TRACT - 022610230-0000 Project Type: Design Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. The following conditions of approval apply: 1. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with California Building Code Chapter 7A, the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. 2. Landscaping, vegetation management, fuel reduction, and other wildland fire safety features and practices are required to comply with all applicable provisions of Fire District Standard 49-1. 3. A site-specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. Fire District Standard 49-1 has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and/or the most current edition of the CA Building Code including all local ordinances and standards. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including energy and structural calculations to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the stricter regulations of the approved Fire protection Plan (if applicable) for the development and current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. A soils report is required for new structures. Vegetation must be design and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the RCFPD for sites located in the VHFHSZ fire area. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/4/2021 Page 4 of 4 or01CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC -A request for a Hillside Design Review to consider the construction of a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District -APN: 1074-531-09; HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: A request to develop a vacant 20,724 square foot lot with a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage. The architecture of the proposed house is generally compatible with the residential neighborhood in which it is located. The project is in compliance with the development standards for the Very Low (VL) Residential District, the Hillside Overlay District, and the Equestrian Overlay District. Design Review Committee forwarded the project to Planning Commission without correction on April 6, 2021. Planning Commission review is required because an excess of 5 feet of excavation/fill for grading purposes is proposed pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.i. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303— New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. BACKGROUND: The 20,724 square foot vacant project site is located on the south side of Carriage Drive about 870 feet southeast of the intersection of the subject street and Ringstem Drive. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. PROJECT ANALYSIS: The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Land Very Low VL Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 North Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District'°2 South Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District'°2 East Single-Family Residence Very Low VL Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 West Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) Residential District' 2 1-Hillside Overlay District 2-Equestrian Overlay District A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single-family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission pursuant to Development Code Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay the roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Development Code Section 17.122.020.D.2). The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,871 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The project complies with the following relevant development standards of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 464" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15' 10' / 15-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% Building Height 35' (30' limit within the Hillside Overlay) 30' The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. Hillside Development Standard Section 17.122.020.D.1.e. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. 2 The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3-foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If changes to the wall plan are found to be necessary during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3-foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E of the Development Code, which requires that the design of the walls integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed front yard landscaping is designed to comply with Development Code Section 17.122.020.F., which requires new development to include the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The proposed front landscaping complies with the front yard landscape requirements, including reducing hardscape to less than 50 percent of the front yard area, at least 25 percent landscape and no more than 25 percent decorative hardscape. The proposed front yard landscaping does not exceed the maximum applied water allowance (MAWA) which meets the criteria of State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO) Section 17.82.020. All vegetation will be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD)for sites located in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ)fire area and is in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. B. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Williams) on February 16, 2021. Staff presented the project to the Committee. The Committee subsequently recommended approval as presented. The Committee stated that the project was well designed and recommended that the project move forward to the Planning Commission for final review. CEQA DETERMINATION: Planning Staff determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. Staff finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Director has reviewed staff's determination of exemption, and based on her own independent judgment, concurs with staffs determination of exemption. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 28, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. 3 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value#7 (Continuous Improvement) by improving the vacant lot with a new high quality single-family residential unit which meets city requirements and guidelines. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A—Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B — Plans Exhibit C — Design Review Committee Comments (April 6, 2021) and Action Agenda Draft Resolution 21-24 of Approval for Hillside Development Review DRC2019-00973 Conditions of Approval 4 "! y ti 1 TV .17 tit ir c+7�f! ff}'y of - '� C r' �'-`r 1p Wn r El 11ROE1011EIII [][] []TOR [] IIINLI I][] E] EIM 11 1] [] 1111111NE1 ❑ 111111111 El ❑ RR [IF 1111 ❑ R FM ❑ R ❑ N Li H O El Li El El M O N El El El ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ ID El ❑ El El 11 ID El 0 El El � o i + r� ❑ �U V �.-1 �f� El ILI El Env long] El >r ®❑ ID ��■■1■�■ ' ' --— — --- — --- e OMENS■� MEMESEEM I 4� El SOR■■■S■ f ❑ ❑ 4J ❑ El X.'1 owl MOLINAR t Erick E . Moll n a r 0 r $ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ Y_ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 11 r ❑❑❑11 11 ❑❑1111 11 r d ❑❑Fill F1❑❑❑❑ - www . moIinardesigIn c o m ❑ El J Single Family Fami ' -- . - .--- . - .�_ �4��,� r..�� .�.�:_- _ �.y����-� ��-�;�.:� :y�_�: _ t �- - . ❑ r.. u Residence 19 - AM - - R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ O❑❑0'❑ o m® ❑ ❑a-®❑❑ HaTETE ❑® ❑ROO ❑T ❑ ❑T ❑ ED ❑ ❑ROm ❑T ❑ [R❑ ❑TOR ❑ ❑ ❑ IN IT ❑ M ❑ ❑ o Job Address: ❑❑❑❑❑❑aT®❑❑❑r® o O❑❑a-❑ Jaime Enrique Herrera Avila R❑❑m❑❑❑m❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑L -rr®❑❑❑r III7 El❑❑®❑�❑ El r❑❑®❑❑ It Legal Description: DDT❑❑O❑TR❑❑TM❑❑NOIIl7mm®�TH❑❑iT❑O❑ R❑❑m❑❑❑m❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ RONOHO❑EiEiOMONOEi®ODNTEi OD❑EiN❑EiRNOREi[NO❑ Deer Canyon OTNTD ON❑00®ORN®ND❑LjR MLjNRNNORONN LJ M®mw00❑NON m®mO❑M ND❑id TH❑O DN®❑O D TH❑ ❑❑�❑❑❑�❑�❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑®❑a❑ Molinar Design Inc. ❑m��❑ NOT[][] 11 It❑ODNT❑RDDORONR OD❑0®❑ODNTD❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑L❑❑❑m❑LL❑❑❑ ❑0000T ON oo3IDm 000T®m7I➢ ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑®m❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ El El DOmH®ONONRo ON TOD ON NORD NDNOTNN LIT LjONTH ❑❑❑❑❑❑®❑❑❑ R❑I IN❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑❑IE11 It TackstemSt Spirit Landscaping RE]El ❑❑❑ Ll o O❑Liu 000TooOOTH O❑00❑oR o000 omommo❑17ON❑ ❑®❑�❑m❑❑IID❑o-❑Sarami Engineering Consulting THN❑LjOT❑®❑OD HLjRMOLj❑NDONNNmONTH ON❑®DON ❑❑❑❑❑ EH❑❑®❑iID❑❑r❑❑❑❑❑ N ❑rEEd®❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ o Almond St El Contractors ❑❑N❑❑❑❑❑EII❑❑EII❑®❑❑❑ ❑M❑❑❑ v ❑ ❑❑®❑ o o � Er❑ AJA ENGINEERING, INC. Gardner Medical a a Zoning: R ❑❑❑❑ ❑TR❑[IT❑R❑❑[IN❑[Bd❑❑RIN11 Lot Area: ❑❑®❑❑®❑®❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑OR❑N❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ N a a Hidden Farm Rd x Bulding SF: First floor : 3,494.00 SF ®❑❑❑❑❑❑®❑❑❑❑❑d Second floor: 3,377.00 SF _ 1 d8 Carriage Drive o Total: 6,871.00 SF ❑❑®❑❑❑❑❑�❑ A.G.I Geotechical, Inc. carrari St El - ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑O'❑❑❑❑ ❑m❑❑®❑ o ❑❑❑N❑=❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ HGS Financial roup a,�rfl Deck SF: ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑�❑❑�❑❑❑ El California Patio SF: ❑❑❑❑❑ Hillside�j p SITE El M❑m❑❑IIIL7m Y Porch SF: ❑❑❑❑ ❑®❑❑❑❑❑❑❑®❑p'❑ Perfect Design/Engineering Inc. m Community Church Thermasol Steambath Balconies: ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑uuFFP i❑i i d m Q o wflodr,e�e°' d [I[[I][][]IIT❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ d RidgeCenyo v ❑Breezeway: ❑❑❑❑❑ � °4d 0 Pool House: ❑❑❑❑❑ u El1 he Church of W+ldernessDr ❑❑❑❑ETA❑ ❑ Pool Equipment: ❑❑❑❑ Jesus Christ of Latter— Pool House Patio: ❑❑❑❑❑ Hillside Rd Hillside Rd Garage#1: ❑❑❑❑❑ Hillside Rd 8 a Garage#2: ❑❑❑❑❑ Monaco Pi � y Cali. Patio Bathroom: ❑❑❑❑ m °� Wash o Deer Canyon o = BeechwoodDr T ❑❑ Building Footprint ❑❑❑❑❑❑ Apple 8 Rancho De Philo Winery pp o El Coverage: ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑F-- 25% MAX. Poplar st t El Rear Yard Lot Coverage: ❑❑❑❑❑®❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ Hermosa School 1 30% MAX. Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Wilson Ave ❑H [I ❑T ❑❑ Sprinkler System: ❑®m❑❑❑Lr❑❑❑ Parking: ❑m❑ o 2-Car Garage: ❑❑❑❑❑ 8 ID SETBACK DETERMINATION 8 ID Side Yard Setback: 110110 EII ❑FFM❑11110 EII❑FFM Front Yard Setback: ❑❑110 . . 8 Rear Yard Setback: ❑❑110 ❑TIT ❑ El No. of Lots Used: ❑ 0 10839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga CA 91737 oe MOLINAR Material Board �vi Foam Stucco Corbels FauxWood MENOMONEE � ( Corinth Tumbled Travertine r Spanish OutdoorWall Light Coronado Stone Products Wrought Iron Guardrail Ledgestone Huron Faux at Balcony Stone Veneer Smooth Trowel Finish Stucco Spanish Style Wood Garage Door Polar Bear Behr Paint 790001 -641000 11 0 — EXISTING o BUILDING ILI I ❑ _ N2 7° ►► e� — — � II II El El 2098.04TC EJ ❑ 2097.37FLNor E]II II � � � \ >� . BLOCK WALL LL, ❑ II II EX � El El o I II II e G z El ❑ 5 POOL \ BATHROOM � b II II EQP POOH — 33.00 SQ. FT 7 � \ X ❑ L� I I I I 60.00 SQ.Lo FT HOUSE - 77�� � � .62 ► P 110.00 SQ. FTEl 1 _ ❑ � II II � � \ El 0 � I I I � 1p°9E:1 p G \ ❑ zI ° G FD. LT. LS.4430 \ 01 PL-PROD. b LIFORN A Q a G°P\`G o 422.0 SIQ. F BREEZEWAY0.00 SQ. FT G°Q \ 2095.15TC 15 TRAIL II�� 7.0 DRAINAGO / °g2 ° El \ W TWO CAR \ 2094.49FL 8 EASEMENT II II EASEMENT DECK(ABOV ) 361.00 SQ. F ARAG E � og ° 9 42 0 SQ. FT 2°9 \NG ❑ II II a s a a DWY G I II II CO N a a b II II SPA o v ga II II � � JACUZZI 10\ a ❑ a 5 EX. VINYL FENCE II II a ZG°Q\\�° O II II � � II II NEW TWO STORY a a I I 2093.91TC o \ 2093.25FL N SINGLE II II oN FAMILY DWELLING / _ 8 1ST. FLOOR 3,178.00 SQ.FT. I I I I = Q 2ND FLOOR=2,889.00 SQ.FT a g0�� a 9 Z�°Q\ TOTAL SQ.FT.=6,067.00 SQ. FT II II — OPEN DECK PORCH =98.00 SQ.FT I P 1� n C rn �O zos6.00 CALI ECK P3611 00 SQ.FT. Cu SQ.FT. E r i c k E . M o I i n a r �p G° BALCONIE =45+71= 116.00 SQ.FT. % 2°g1�\ 3 a ❑ ❑ ❑ °❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑oo pp 209 NG BREEZ AY=70.00 SQ.FT. G°P ZGOQNG _ II II I � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o G°P GARAGE# =425.00SQ.FT a I ❑r °°°❑ ❑ °°❑❑❑r d °°°❑❑❑❑❑❑ � II II GARAGE#2=467.00 SQ.FT \ www . moIinardesign . com ❑❑ BATHROOM = .00 SQ.FT as POOL HOUSE=3 .00 SQ.FT. zi 8 II / 4 ,_ „ ❑r❑��TFM❑ ❑ o v LOT 52 TR. 12332 2 6 4 B II II pN M.B.218,6371 U Single Family Residence 7� II II / 9 i ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑r�❑❑ ❑rM EX. CONCRETE I I I I OPEN DECK /,- / aGOQN° R❑❑I�7❑ ❑❑CI I I ❑❑❑❑ ❑C 1 ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ILI CHANNEL DRAIN I \ I I O O❑❑d"❑ ❑❑ 2091.56TC m� ❑ ❑a'®❑❑ HI rr rl I tj 2090.89FL ❑ E] II II \ CU El E] J II II 19 4 o Q. " FRONT YARD SETBAC � b � I I I I ❑❑❑®❑®❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ o O II II °Q��° °9 ❑❑�❑❑❑�❑�❑❑❑ o P ❑m��❑ NOT[][] — -- It O I I I I - ------ ___ _ -- - — — --- -- -- R[][IN❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑1111fl O I I I I L _ _ R❑❑ ❑❑❑ El CMII II a° ------ -- 9p E]Z° ems° '-011 C31 pp 5... b G° Q `W TE I I I I G°Q\N° L® 1` II II o \ 30,00' II II ❑ 91 . 131 P .L. ON LT. ROD. 0 ❑�❑ ❑❑ o ON PL-PROD. co o ono I I I I — _�_ \ El II II _ - — -�- EX. BLOCK WALL ❑ ]FTI5..� N 150 53' 1711W ❑❑ a El2088.96TC o 2022.28FL ID EEl l W I ❑❑❑❑dT�❑ J EXISTING M W I BUILDING 0 FF—EXISTING BUILDING "— 8 O ❑ DC o o El FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE ❑ 1 El ❑ ❑❑N e 11 OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. El 2090.13TC FD. SPK& ❑❑❑❑�I❑❑ o 2089.46FL TR.12332- 8 ID El 19 PROPOSED SITE PLAN El ❑ SCALE 1 /8" = 1 '-0" o 2 0 ❑ ❑ LEGEND — EXISTING STRUCTURE ITY OF RANCH CUCAMONGA EXISTING WALL AS NOTED o EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP zoo EXISTING WOOD/IRON FENCE AS NOTED --------- FINISHED SURFACE LINE 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE = CENTERLINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 917370 PROPERTY LINE --(98)— EXISTING CONTOUR ELEV. �98)— PROPOSED CONTOUR ELEV. EXISTING PSL PIPE SLOPE BUILDING TC TOP OF CURB oo'40"E FL FLOWLINE — � � � _ J / / l �2?099?8.094�Tj�C _ J I/ SCO SEWER CLEANOUT 2097.37FL II II EX. BLOCK WALL — I � I I/ 1 A/C ASPHALT CONCRETE FF FINISH FLOOR II II _ Z_ I I II I UT UNKNOWN UTILITY III II I — —111-62' P.A. PLANTING AREA I II I FS FINISH SURFACE 4/1FD. FG FINISH GRADE V II II 00 I 0FH FIRE HYDRANT � LT. LS.4430 \ I II 1 II II 1 II I II ON PL—PROD. / HT. HEIGHT I I II I II 2095.15TC 15 TRAIL 7.0 DRAINAGE — —— GAS METER I II 12094.49FL M EASEMENT II II EASEMENT I II I x105.50 EXISTING ELEVATION I III II I p� II I I Ll 105.50 PROPOSED ELEVATION I III II I I II I II II I i II I EXISTING UTILITY AS NOTED � ff I EX. VINYL FENCE II II � I EXISTING TREE i II II I II 12093.91TC 2093.25FL LOT 52 II 111 II I I II I 111 II I II I I No II I II II �o TR. 12332-2 II I II II oo M.B. 218/63-71 . I II III II I I �� I II II v I I III II I �� I II II I I III II I II I EX. CONCRETE II II I CHANNEL DRAIN J�III I III1IIIIIII1I1IIIIIIIII1I1III III � IIIIII1II III IIIII\1IIII I I III �o�o 0 �0, II I I I lI1I1 I1 III i I11I I 1 i I 1IIII I I I 2091.56TC 2090.89FL 0 9000 I s — FD. LT. L S.44_30P _ I 191.13' ® I II ON PL—PROD. EX. BLOCK WALL I I — — II II � I II I II i I 2088.96TC - - - , ►� i 12022.28FL CITY BENCHMARK BUIILDIING � �� � GRAPHIC SCALE EXISTING BUILDING io zo ao BM NUMBER #80 I DV I� io o s I FD. CHIS. SQUARE ON TOP OF CURB LOCATED AT SOUTH SIDE II I II I I ( IN FEET ) OF D/W 82 FT. SOUTH OF POWER POLE #1072464E ALONG THE II 1 inch = 10 ft. EAST SIDE OF HERMOSA AVENUE, SOUTH OF WILSON AVENUE. I� I 1I 12089.46FL FD. SPK&W. FLUSH, FITS PER ELEVATION = 85.247 FEET (2005 ) TR.1 332-2 M.B. 218 63-71. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY: TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY MAP JOB NO: A J A ADS: 018-095 LOT 52 OF TRACT MAP NO. 12332-29 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY ADDRESS: 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA. 91737 DATE: 04/17/18 OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS PER MAP RECORDED IN M.B. 2189 P.O. BOX 1 633 APN: 1074-531 —09-0000 SHEET 1 of 1 PAGES 63-71 . OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. DOWNEY, CA 90240 APN: 1074-531 -09-0000 (562) 760-6040 TEL ENGINEER SCALE: 1 "= 10' DRAWN BY: D.P. CHECKED BY: A.A. EMAIL. cdseng@yahoo.com ALEJANDRO J. ALATORRE DATE R.C.E. 32761 , EXP. 6/30/18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA rp cn aTo r � zip C2 C7 � � � � -4IT1 m CO) — m o M o r L r z T cn a -0 a _ _ � -u � � D cn -q -1 � rt� i rn C� Z N y, y = C I I m I I m 0 can D o r �. *4 40 o T000 � a oa o o 00 � z � � � � r Z oTom m �� o � o m I I I Ci7 .L Z II T � (7) N m m -U rm 0 = m m TI m c m D cn -Ti � m u m u C TI m m m m W v C Z N CA x x x m z z r z z cn m r O X m z x x x x a s � . . . . � � o n _ _ _ Cm C7 rn O = y a C� �1 v --I = m F v> z z � m m � cn z z O z = o cn o m z � T p N N >O C R1 O = T y O Z c� c� N c� m z � z om m N z m z z z Zo O o T v m m p m c z m n o m o :cm cm C7 y o = Z ;_ p o p -Ti c O O D O r c O = D O -n y C W cn m r m D m � D F � zo ao no z Z op z F- � CO Z m a CD O c Z D m m n v — a O a C mn DCIO 0 m m 0 z c Z M C O O z � m r zz � z m C O T N O N Z r T o m m m m -Ti T T W O C m C) m z z o W Z O m = C p T m m C7 .� COP) IV cm Cn — — _ C r r T CD Z = * n o p a T Z = O O - p a mT y MN _ ,00'LZl — — — — — M„55,LZ.lLN — — N— nco T N v c:, _ — cai» � � a W� - - - V � a, 00 x x X x CO)C -7 Z a C I Zo 2m CAN m CZ7 m NO ' a s c o = N00 o � � m CD Z m Z � Z�' Ln C C) Z L'7 y M T = I H T SO'tiLOZ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O = SO'CLOZI'v T 90U06 —_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 9 LOB - - - - - - - - - - -0 80Z a CIO- - — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 8Z'6 x r No R1 a x N W Cm M CD o N a v II M T W CA C* a a00 00 o N Z a ^' x � C10 v C) N O Cil oo . . cn C CO Z = CO) CA Cl � V M O 0 i I o 11` W CA 0o z I x CA) v N N C:) O N 00 O N CO) CA I o�Q2 f c x I W g C) O — zz C-) � O OD p in 00 CD x � W r- x O0 x C N O 00 x r N jV r- O 00 i W DD X DD CID D 0 I r C) > 0 m =a < D I � > Z m r p o 0 co J = O m r I 00 U) MC ) O 0 r =X 0 (00 z a O o� IM �: ul Cl CY) C 0 I D 0 -0 N I WN N > r z O y ■ ■ I 00 90 a CoI CO) 0 x 4 O D o 0 0 0-) WX O I 0 0 ON W D c> x ' 0O m o Z 3 Cf) N x C 0 mco I bo w N I � %M v m J I n �0 z — Ni M W w*4 m x Cil cn w*4 m C7 I j o I �002 ■ m D p O r1i =a z C,4 O CA 0 N ZJ J 0 rn m D I X 0-) � CA m _ _ — — — — — CD z 9NIiSN3 " L 00 }11dM301S _ _ _ — 1 — N _ o I V( O L O Z _ V _ — I lci'01) � / �095.g4 EXISTING — o 1-0 ® / o SIDEWALK �20g765 oo O� _ - - - - - - - - - - - -�� - - - - - - _ - -NN - - - - 2095.6'8 c c0 c0 z D — N� SA SA CD CD N N Ij 90 I TI "cD cD cD Z _ m 000 co 000Norn AN VI cn ?U p rnw w rc r n O 0 v 90 N p w C)C) (D po C7 PO Ln � 1�1 x_ L=83.48' I w - R=430,00' C A G E D D R _I V _ x li -0 E D N OIND xCD N c0 m � � m � 0 °° N o n o D �7 C z II w 000 O = � O o O� D = O c O 01 Z O m C N ` ♦ z O 0 ... O o C ... O o m m z n p 0o D u - c� C O c0 n o D CA r, m Z m o c- = D m m m0 D CC) O o a) 00 00 ZO D D � O 0 . . m \ c0 Ul A r^ 0 1'-4" 20'-2" 6" 4'-8" 6" 8'-1" 6" " "10'-0 6" 19'-9 20'-6" 6" "9'-6" 6 0 46'-311 3'-0" 8" 12'-0" 7" 3'-0" 2'-3" 2'-0" 17'-3" 7'-6" 2'-6" Ll e ID El (N)-PANTRY JN) P-OTTERY-ROOW El El 0 8 CD El ED � � o r 0 � F R 0 Luui _o 6 ❑❑ o 0 N RCN (N) CALIFORNIA PATIO (N) KITCHEN MW o CV 0 T ®g �® O (N) 2 CAR GARAGE � o 0 r N ❑❑ T � (N) ISLAND o (N) DINING ROOM b El El o ID El e M M El El❑❑T❑ ❑OOT❑❑El El El ❑❑T❑❑❑OOR ❑ 11111111111100❑Tr❑ o C° dV❑ ❑❑OOR ❑ ❑11❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑T 11 TOT❑❑Li Li❑T❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑Li Li❑❑T ❑ It CV LoEl e El CoID 0 Li N II e MOLINAR ii % rh 11 rh Co P II y E r i c k E M o l i n a r � N DECK ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ( ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑r ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑Mr]❑rd ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ (N) GREAT www . molinardesign . com ❑❑ L °O o (N) GREAT ROOM I I 2091.75 2" (N) PORCH oN o 0 0 r 8 o 10 (N) HALL I N M ❑r❑[IDELT[T❑ 8 N N Single Family Residence up 111111111111 Err[ID❑❑ ❑r[r T I R❑❑m❑ El❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ M O❑❑0'❑ o El m® ❑ El EIr®❑❑Ha-ra-❑ ❑� ❑ o 9'-0" ❑ ED Co (N) FIRE PLACE O ❑ T ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ ❑ 00 ❑❑T❑❑❑[I]❑[i]❑❑❑N. o N ❑ o ❑mUM❑ NOT[][] 11 b NL R❑EEN❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑❑[Ell b R❑❑ ❑❑❑ 0 0 0 (N) GUEST SUITE LIVING ROOM C (N) MUD Lo El T ❑ (N) HALL / \ �❑ N / \ ❑EE❑ ❑❑ (N) DECK Cl? El 8 Co ' (N) POWDER (N) LAUNDRY (N) 2 CAR GARAGE o -- El ROOM ROOM coEl r' N 0 0 (N) WCL 41 (N) STORAGE EEl l ❑❑❑❑dT FFIM❑ 0 0 o (N) GUEST SUITE _ BEDROOM in ❑[R❑T ❑❑OOR (N) BATH ROOM ❑ EIEIN ❑ 8 El cfl 1'-811 21-011 O cfl o ❑❑❑❑dV❑❑11 ❑ 1'-4" 17'-8" 27'-3" 7" T-0" 2'_9" 2'_6" 9" 8'-6" 5'-0" 11'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" 8 NEW FIRST N El N 1'-4" 17'-8" 14'-3" 6" 11'-6" 4'-3" 6" T-9" 6" T-3" 2'-6" 6" 10'-0" 6" 20'-0" 6" 8 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" - _ ❑ ❑ 1' 4" 17'-8" 27'-3" 16'-3" 34'-6" 01 —40 �� ❑ WALL LEGEND O ❑ 2X4 STUD WALL 97'-0" 2 75'-011 o 0 19'-091 27'-3" 19'-911 8'-0" 1'-0" H 40 H 6" 18'-6" 6" 26'-3" 6" 19'-3" 6" 8'-0" 1'-0" ol 2'-0" El E] 19'-0" 2'-10" 4'41 12'-8" 4'-0" T-9" 6'-11" 6'-0" 6'-10" 6'-0" 1'-0" H El ZoEl b H H El CD M - - H o ❑ ' Elio ❑ El El o (N) PRIVATE OFFICE ro co o ❑❑ El T - b M El'r', (N) MASTER BEDROOM B o o ❑ 11 N (N) BEDROOM #1 "' ❑ ❑❑ 0 Co ' H ' Co ❑ o io ce) b (N) DECK T H H H T (N) WCL 00 NEl Co ❑ H H Co (N) WCL H (N) LAUNDRY 00 ROOM � H M ❑ r` ° (N) LN w H All p A r MOLINApt H 0 M o@Ssii % k il •. 00 r N E r i c k E M o I i n a r Cu ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c co ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o _ ❑r ❑❑❑❑ r] ❑❑❑❑❑rd ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 0 o www . molinardesign . com ❑ C El CD Co H H Single Family OPEN - C Residence 00 o OPEN a DN TO BELOW OPEN 9 o 9 o in 2 TO BELOW N N ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑a-r�❑❑ ❑ram N TO BELOW � R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ O❑❑ ❑0' o m® ❑ ❑a'®❑❑H Err[I-❑ ❑� ❑ H El 0 U ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ L cc❑ c G o ❑❑11❑❑❑�❑�❑❑❑ ❑❑ O ❑ M ❑mom❑❑ NOT[][] El b ❑ R❑HJ❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑❑[Ell 00 R❑El ❑❑❑ H z _ ❑ q U ;;T o Q (N) WCL o N m CV Z V El M M a� (N) BEDROOM #2 4'_6" 6" 5'-81 6" 8'-111 `0 [IEEE] ❑❑ ❑ H op -fl 8'-2" 6" 5'-8" 6" 8'-011 El H 00 N (N) BEDROOM #3 q M H H El _ ❑ (N) WCL "o C° io io -6 H [] [][]ON [] ❑❑OOR H El LIE]N H ❑ El NEW SECOND 19'-0" 3'-5" 8'-8" 10'-2" 4'-0" 20'-9" 6'-0' T-0' ❑❑❑❑�❑❑ H ❑ FLOOR PLAN ❑ 6" 18'-6" 6" 2'-lift 6" 8'-2" 6" 5'-8" 6" 8'-0" 6" 19'-3" 6" 8'-0" 1'-0" � H SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" El 19'-011 3'-511 8'-8" 34'-lift 9'-0" 4.1 WALL LEGEND ❑ r H 2X4 STUD WALL 75'-011Jo O Z Bo 0 H H 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) I 1 4-1 0 El El ED El fill El 4 .12PITCHROOF (TYP) �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �- � ❑ ❑ H .o O ❑ El ,T El)> )> )> )> )> )> )> )> ) JP i N�Q ❑ )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) )) ) ❑ ED El _A ' ^V )) )) )) )) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (� ( \ �A �A �A �A �A �A �A �A H El �A IcO H El ILI El �A �A �A �A �A �A �A �A �A �A �A El El )> )> )> )> )> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ❑ _ /4„ : 12" PITCH ROOF (, El Ll )> )> )> )> )> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> H El El OLIN q A )> )> )> )> )> )> >> >> >> >> >> >> %4�� : 12" PITCH ROOF .y E r i c k E M o l i n a r d ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑r ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑❑r d ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ '- �- �- '� w w w . m o I i n a r d e s i g n . c o m ❑ f, f f, f, f, f, f, f, � ❑ ❑r❑riELTum❑ H ED S i n g I e F a m i l y Residence „ �Q �(�( —( —(� O (� (� (� )) )) )) )) )) � � )) )) )) ) �T�T�T�T R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ILI 4o �❑ �� )) )) )) )) )) ) �TTTTTT ��� �� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� �� — — — — — m® ❑ ❑a'®❑❑Ha-rOr❑ ❑� o : 12 PITCH ROOF (, (, (, (, (, (, (, (, (, ❑ H b El ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ H H ❑m1111EL1❑ NOT[][] El > > > > > > > > > > > > ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( R❑HI❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑❑[Ell ❑ RE]El ❑❑❑ El Q , ❑ H ❑ �<< ,� )) )) )) )) )) ,� ,� ,� , i ED El El EEEI EIE] El ❑ C El El If il H ❑ ,J ,� ,� ,� ,� ,� H 10 (TYP) H El El )> )> )> )> )> o R ❑ ❑ ❑❑NEl H ❑ )> 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP), ❑❑❑❑dv❑❑ H H B H 19 H El NEW ROOF PLAN H SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" H ❑ Ll El H H El ID ID El El e ❑ ID -- 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. El J u u T-0 u u I ill H �i co ❑ o Co age ° ° / ❑ �4 a�, ° �a a ��/l j �V p p'�°v 21 2ND FLR. F.F. El M ❑ p - -- 1ST FLR.F.C.' H 4� El H aEl H 0 0❑0 0��'0 0 — - - i❑ El _ 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 8 IV 3 -- 0 - — — - _ El - - - MOUNAR @Ssii % rih 11rih P y E r i c k E M o I i n a r 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ LLI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o PROPOSED FRONT ELEVATION (NORTH ) A ❑ ww . r] ❑❑❑❑❑desg °°°°° Q wmolinar i gn . com ❑❑ SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" H ❑r❑[FI❑Tu❑ ❑ H Single Family Residence _ _ --- --- --- — — — — — — ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑Lim[it]❑❑ ❑rFM -- - -- R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ o _ _ - --- - ❑❑0'❑ o O m® ❑ ❑a'®❑❑Ha-rOr❑ ❑� ❑ H El o - — - ❑ El -- ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ H _ — — — M — — — 2111.16 2ND FLR.F.C. 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. ❑mom❑❑ NOT[][]014 El b R❑HJ❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑ I—Ell R❑El ❑❑❑ H El H ❑�❑ ❑❑ 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. 2102.50 2ND FLR. F. N ❑ F. ❑ M _ -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- _ MEl "I 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. M 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.- B N ❑ 9 El b) El N ❑❑ El Ll ID -' • ❑ El H ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑TCON ❑ 2091.75 MAIN F.F. 2091.75 MAIN F.F. ❑❑ 2091.20 GARAGE F.F. ❑ M H CV El ❑❑❑❑LN❑❑ El ❑ H e ❑ e PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION ( EAST) SCALE: 1/4" = V-0" El Ll H H El El ED ED 1-1 El El 8 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. El- - -- ❑ // 0 0 % % o 1�=Jjl I jill I I I LLL—j— ------ El b 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. 0 co 2101.25 1ST FLR.F.C.'' o ❑ ' � 0 N N H El ILI H A A A %� %� %/ %/ %/ % %/ El 8 0 Ll 2091.75 MAIN F.F. ❑ b e El ❑ MOLINAR @Ssii % rh 11rh P y E r i c k E M o I i n a r 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ [I ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o PROPOSED REAR ELEVATION (SOUTH ) ❑ r] ❑❑❑❑❑des °°°°° Q w w w . molinar i g n . com ❑❑ SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 0 ❑r❑MIEtITTIM❑ 0 Single Family Residence 19 ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑Lim[it]❑❑ ❑rFM R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑❑0'❑ o O El m® ❑ ❑a®❑❑H EIrr EIr❑ ❑ ❑ o El 19 El It ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ o M ❑❑�❑❑❑�❑�❑❑❑ o 2111.16 2ND FLR. F.C. ❑mIIIIELI❑ NOT[][] El It I El R LIEN❑❑R❑�❑ ❑❑�� b R❑El ❑❑❑ o b co El r El 2102.50 2ND FLR. F.F. _ ®❑ M ❑ 2101.25 1ST FLR. F.C. M N o ❑❑ El — - -- — — 1 N — _ El �- O �- F— —_ ❑O — a' 1-1 El - _ — — _ -- El - - 2091.75 MAIN F.F. ❑ ❑❑ ❑ [IT 10N ❑ - _ram- ��I��-ram- ''�—�_��������� ❑ El7 - o C? o N ❑❑ (N) POOL SIN El El H ❑ e PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Ll El H 19'-0" 0 El T-0" 4'-6" 3'-10" 3'-8" b NEW 4 :12 PITCH ROOF (TYP) H H o L ID El El El X POOL POOL EQ P. HOUSE 60.00 SQ. .00 SQ. H FT � � �; ❑ El o — t t t t t t t t t � �'�� t t t t t t t t t ❑ POOL HOUSE PATIO El 190.00 SQ. FT El Ll F1 �11N El H El 1'-4" 16-4 1'-4" H ' " ol 19'-0" MOLIN 1b ii % rh 11rh : rn y E r i c k E M o I i n a r 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑r ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ c ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑r ❑❑❑❑ ❑ ❑Mr]❑rd ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ 2 www . molinardesign . com H ❑r❑uiTum❑ 11 H Single FamilyED Residence ,. ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑a-rmini ❑rF R❑❑m❑ ❑❑m❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ o in [c? O❑❑0"❑ o m® ❑ ❑a'®❑❑Ha-ror❑ ❑� ❑ o El Ln U? It N N ❑❑❑®❑=❑ ❑r❑❑®❑❑ H Eo ❑m1111EL1❑ NOT[][] ❑ E:1 El R❑HJ❑❑R❑ ❑ ❑❑[Ell R❑❑ ❑❑❑ El POOL HOUSE ELEVATION (EAST) POOL HOUSE ELEVATION (WEST) El El SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ❑EE❑ ❑❑ H El El El L9 El 0 ❑❑❑❑❑T FTT❑ B CV CV ❑00 ❑ B❑ 9 9 HO ❑ ❑ ❑ E] El ❑❑❑❑LN❑❑ El a ❑ 19 POOL HOUSE ELEVATION (NORTH) POOL HOUSE ELEVATION (SOUTH) El „ _ ❑ ❑ SCALE: 1/4 1 -0 SCALE: 1/4 1.-0" ❑ e ❑ ❑ ❑ General Notes DISCLAIMER: All dimensions showwn on plan are +/-. GHgd assumes no responsibility for the accuracy/locations of existing features or proposed design elements shown on the plan. Contractor is responsible for verifying the accuracy/locations of existing features and proposed design elements prior to bidding or commencing work on this project. Any discrepancies relating to this design plan must be I brought to the attention of GHgd prior to construction or the contractor assumes full responsibility. II II III II I I III II II EX. BLOCK I WALL II II I -,,. ---------- I O I BATHROOM O�II II I ' I10.II II I , s FT Ll II II � III II II II III II I II II III I I I CALIFORN A PATIO BREEZEWAY LL 1r I I �� 422.00 SQ. F 70.00 SQ. FT 2094.49FL OPEN DECK DECK(ABOVE) III I I I 361.00 SQ. F II II DN DW III II I DN II II SPA III I I I JACUZZI EX. VINYL FENCE I I I I ¢\�'o III II I Y 2093.91 TC IIFI RE BOWL5 (2) 2093.25FL I I _w LL J DN O 17 0 FOU NTAI N T. = S .FT III II 2 F O 2,8 .0 Q. w a T TA SQ _ ,06 .00 F z III II I POOL P RC = .00 1cn ~ OPEN DECK ALI R A P 10 42 O S .FT W z LL C 360 .F . III I I z AL RNIZE AY71011 S 0 T .FT II II G AG 1 = 25. S T III I I R E# -4 .00 Q.F P BAL R U M =33. 0 S Q•T II I I I DN L 52 R. 33 2 46�_4 j 2 II II DN III II II I I I INFINITY WATER FALL 0 OPEN DECK EX. CONCRETE I I I I No. Revision/Issue Date CHANNEL DRAIN II I 2091.56TC 1 De51gn PIan5 07/20/ 1 9 III I I I 2090.89FL OPEN DECK III II II I I I 42" FRONT YARD 5ET5AGK I I FIRE-PIT III II I Designed By GH: III II I I I I GH garden designs 1008 Beverly Way III I I Altadena, CA 91001 II II626.523.9605 1:11:1E: �' ghgardendesigns@gmail.com III I I I m ghgardendesigns.com III II ' II II I III II II II I III II I III II � II 11 --=ONE EX. BLOCK WALL x III II Project/Client: MOLINAR DESIGNS 2088.96TC 2022.28FL 1 0839 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 1 737 0 DWY D r Project Sheet HARDSCAPE PLAN 2090.13TC Date 2089.46FL L I . 00June 06, 2019 Scale 0 8 16 24 32 feet 2 i„ = 1 '-0" O s 1/8" = 1'-0" LAN DSCAFE SITE General Notes PLANTING NOTES: PLANT SCHEDULE DISCLAIMER: All dimensions showwn on plan are I . ALL WORK SHALL CONFORM TO APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. +/-. GHgd assumes no responsibility for the SHRUBS BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER WUCOLS QTY accuracy/locations of existing features or proposed 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE STANDARD IN FORM UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. design elements shown on the plan. Contractor is 3. ALL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. ACTUAL LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED IN THE ACHILLEA X 'MOONSHINE' MOONSHINE YARROW I GAL. POT L 15 responsible for verifying the accuracy/locations of FIELD. existing features and proposed design elements prior WATER WELL: SET ROOTBALL CROWN 4. ALL PLANT MATERIAL WITHIN A SPECIES SHALL HAVE SIMILAR SIZE AND SHAPE TYPICAL to bidding or commencing work on this project. Any 4' HIGH AT SHRUB, 1 HIGHER ANIGOZANTHOS X 'BUSH RANGER' DWARF RED KANGAROO PAW I GAL. POT L 44 NO WATER WELL THAN SURROUNDING OF THE SPECIES. ANY PLANT FOUND TO BE SUB STANDARD WILL BE REMOVED AND discrepancies relating to this design plan must be FINISHED GRADE. brought to the attention of GHgd prior to construction AT LAWN AREA. REPLACED WITH THE SAME/SIMILAR PLANT TYPICAL OF THE SPECIES AT THE or the contractor assumes full responsibility. SLOPE FINISHED GRADE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. ASPARAGUS DENSIFLORU5 'MYERS' MYERS ASPARAGUS I GAL. POT M 94 AT BACKFILL AWAY FROM � ' ROOTBALL. 5. ALL SHRUB PLANTING AREAS SHALL RECEIVE A SURFACE LAYER OF WALK-ON SHREDDED °pD MULCH TO 2" DEPTH TREE BARK MULCH. MULCH TO BE APPLIED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 2'' OVER FINISH •D 11 D° BUDDLEJA X 'PURPLE HAZE' LO BEHOLD PURPLE HAZEF BUTTERFLY BUSH 5 GAL. POT M 3 AT WATER WELL. GRADE. NO BARE EARTH SHALL BE SHOWING THROUGH THE MULCH COVERING. DDpp FINISHED GRADE. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SAMPLES OF MULCH FOR OWNER APPROVAL PRIOR TO D° zzo INSTALLATION. CALL15TEMON CITRINU5 'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH 5 GAL. POT L 18 N ZOJ III III III III III III G. SOIL PREPARATION FOR ALL TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE: G PARTS ON-SITE SOIL / 3 + -i< Ili I III II ROOTBALL it PARTS NITROGEN STABILIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT / 10 LBS. 1 2- 1 2- 1 2 FERTILIZER J <0� DIETES X 'LEMON DROP' FORTNIGHT LILY I GAL. POT M 22 Q �— PLANT TABLETS AS NOTED PER CU. YD. / 10 LBS. GYPSUM PER CU. YD. /2 LBS IRON SULPHATE PER CU. YD. o OR SPECIFIED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE MADE AWARE OF ALL EXISTING/PROPOSED UTILITIES, AND a � BACKFILL MIX, SEE NOTES SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE. HYDRANGEA QUERCIFOLIA 'PEE WEE' OAKLEAF HYDRANGEA 5 GAL. POT M 13 if 3o N AND SPECIFICATIONS. g. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY PLANT AND MATERIALS DISCREPANCIES NATIVE SOIL MIX RESULTING FROM THE CONTRACTORS TAKEOFFS. • °� LAVANDULA STOECHAS 'LARKMAN HAZEL' TM HAZEL 5PANI5H LAVENDER 5 GAL. POT L 30 2 X ROOTBALL FIRMLY COMPACTED. 12" AT 1 GALLON 22" AT 5 GALLON LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'BREEZE' DWARF MAT RUSH I GAL. POT M 91 32" AT 15 GALLON NASSELLA TENUISSIMA 'PONY TAILS' MEXICAN FEATHERGRA55 5 GAL. POT L I-1 1 SHRUB PLANTING •� OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLVE' TM LITTLE OLLE OLIVE 5 GAL. POT L 15 1 = I-0 FX—PL—FX—SHRB-0� I I I I • PHOENIX CANARIENSI5 CANARY ISLAND DATE PALM I e'HT TRUNK BfB M 5 III II I -- PITTOSPORUM TENUIFOLIUM 'SILVER SHEEN' TAWHIWHI 15 GAL. POT M 9(0 II II _ EX. BLOCK WALL 0 ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'TUSCAN BLUE' TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY I GAL. POT L 19 III II STRELITZIA REGINAE BIRD OF PARADISE 5 GAL. POT L 38 II II _ -- II II • 10' UN n _ — n o„n o'eno iuo _ Ir ilkk I • w w +rn,Sri i, nn�, i e�ir �wi� ewe c wi �� Gam/ •— _ �/ � - � w w w CALIFORN A II II PATIO BREEZEWAY 422.00 SQ. F T 70.00 SQ. FT 2095.15TC WL I 2094.49FL OPEN DECK ���� � DECK(ABOVE) BUD PU4 (3) 361.00 SQ. FT STR REG (25) 5 GAL. 5 GAL. LAV LAR (30) pyyY ' t)N / \' PHO CAN (5) 5 CxAL. EN 10 HT TRUNK II II SPA III I I w w JACUzzI NAS PON (1 1) W w 5 GAL. W w No. Revision/issue Date EX. VINYL FENCE (15) ACH MOO � .� .� W .� W .� w .� W .� w .� 0 W �, w �, III II I I I I _ Design Plans 07/20/ 19 w FIRE BOWLS (2) ' 1 COAL. Y w w w 2093.91TC 2093.25FL III o (13) HYD WEE w w a w 5 CsAL. N. J DN • • • • w w w y' • Lei T T. Q a xL X 2 FUJ III II w w } POOL P RC = 00 F OPEN DECK W w w w w w w z ALI R A P 10 42 0 S .FT ��� �� ?1< w Designed By GH: w Z AL NI 11 �$ � SOD AREAS GH garden designs I I I I • " " =4 +71 .FT w w � � w � � w � � y � w w R zE AY 0. S T. 1008 Beverly Way Altadena, CA 91001 • ,� w o (15) ROS TUS G AG 1 = 25. S T w w w w w w w w w '0 I 1 COAL. o hg.523.9605 ardendesig @9 ns mail.com I BA R M _ 3. s T ���, � � � � � � " " � g26 P L u - o Q. - �11r • ° ghgardendesigns.com D" L 52 R. 33 2 � „ I I I I � �. �. �� °� ° .2 /63 1 � � • DN o .. �D • Dig D OLE LIT (I E0 0 �� i_•_ ° � . w 5 COAL. INFINITY WATER FALL 0 • OPEN DECK EX. CONCRETE ' CHANNEL DRAIN r � 2091.56TC 2090.89FL ASP DEN (-iW • a OPEN DECK 1 GAL. I II w II II w w w w w w " FRONT YARD SETBACK Project Client: II I I w w W w w w W MOLINAR DESIGNS FIRE-PIT II J J J W W W W W W w 10639 Carriage Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 9 1 737 .:/ Jw w w II 1 II II J II II W II II Project Sheet II II up PLANTING PLAN L A L �, - ' _. ., - Date une (91) LOM BRE J OG 20 19 1 COAL. L2 . 00 (22) DIE LEM Scale • --� ��- 16 24 32 feet 20 III II -- -- �� ANI OR2 II i � ------- -------- 1 CaAL. _ ---- - ---- EX. BLOCK WALL 1 COAL. - - -- --- ' (15) CAL LIT (96) PIT SIL x = 5 COAL. 15 GAL. � 1 8" = 1 LANDSCAPE SITE DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS April 6, 2021 7:00 p.m. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973 — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. - Site plan and architectural review of a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4- car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive - APN: 1074- 531-09. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 — New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Site Characteristics: The 18,924 square foot vacant project site is located on the north side of Carriage Drive. The property dimensions are approximately 89 feet along the north property line, 191 feet along the east property line, 127 feet along the south property line, and 197 along the west property line. The downslope lot has an elevation of approximately 220 feet as measured at the curb face along the north property line to the south property line, for a maximum grade change of approximately 9 feet from the north to south property lines. The site is covered in short grasses. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Very Low (VL) Residential Very Low (VL) District Site Vacant Land Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District North Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District South Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District East Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Very Low (VL) Residential Single-Family Very Low (VL) District West Residence Residential Hillside Overlay District Equestrian Overlay Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story, single- family residence with an attached 840 square foot garage on the project site. The proposed grading includes up to 9 feet of fill which necessitates that the project be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission per Section 17.122.020.G.1.1. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 2 The proposed residence has a modern Mediterranean style design theme, which includes stone veneer, smooth trowel stucco finish, rafter tails, clay tile roofing, vinyl windows, and aluminum balcony railings. The residence was designed to be compliant with the Hillside Design Guidelines (Section 17.122.020.D.2), including minimizing view obstructions by overbuilding of the site. The building mass is broken up through the use of multiple wall plane changes and the incorporation of exterior decks along the north and south elevation. The proposed 6,874 square foot residence consists of a 3,494 square foot first floor, which includes the main living area, garage, and a guest suite, and a 3,377 square foot second floor which consists of four (4) bedrooms and a laundry room. The first and second floor include decks along the south elevation. The size of the 6,871 square foot residence is in keeping with homes constructed on Carriage Drive within the vicinity of the project site, which range in size from 2,000 square feet to 8,500 square feet. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District as follows: Development Requirements Proposed Front Yard 42' +/- 5' 46'-4" Interior Side Yards 10' / 15' 10' / 15'-9" Rear Yard 60' 60' Lot Coverage 25% max 24% 35' (30' limit within the Hillside 30' Building Height Overlay) The project complies with the intent of the Hillside Overlay District, which seeks to facilitate appropriate development of hillside areas. The site is a downslope lot with an elevation change of approximately 9 feet from the north to the south property lines. The proposed grading design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to construct the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a., to terrace the building to follow the slope. Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.C. requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west elevations with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement. The maximum permitted retaining wall height is 4 feet within the Hillside Overlay District, with stepped retaining walls permitted to have a maximum height of 3 feet with a minimum 3 foot separation between the stepped walls. The applicant is not proposing any retaining walls. If this changes during construction, the applicant is responsible to submit plans to the Planning Department showing that no retaining walls are proposed in excess of 4 feet and a minimum 3- foot separation is between the stepped retaining wall. The project site has existing 6-foot-high perimeter walls along the east, south and west property lines. The existing perimeter walls are DRC COMMENTS HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRCDRC2019-00973- MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. April 6, 2021 Page 3 in keeping with Hillside Design Guideline Sections 17.122.020.E., which requires that the design of walls that integrate the materials and colors used of the residence. The proposed landscaping will be required to comply with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.F., including the use of drought-tolerant landscaping to protect slopes from erosion and planting shrubs to soften the views of the downslope elevations. The project is within the High Fire Hazard Zone and within a wildland-urban interface area. A landscape plan has not provided at this time. As a Condition of Approval, this plan will be required when grading and construction plans for the project are submitted to the City for plan check. Staff Comments The project conforms with the Development Code and the Hillside Design Standards and Guidelines and provides a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible and to reduce the height of the structure to limit view obstructions as seen from the residences to the north. The residence is well-designed and carries the design theme to all elevations, including providing wall plane articulation. The residence is stepped with the existing grade which further reduces the overall bulk as seen from Carriage Drive. Earthwork is limited to 500 cubic yards of export and grading is limited to the area necessary to construct the residence and open deck area to the south of the residence. The proposed design does not require Variances or Minor Exceptions. Major/Secondary Issues: None Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: ORecommend approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. ❑Recommend approval with modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director / Planning Commission. ❑Recommend conditional approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission. ❑Recommend denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Staff Planner: Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner RESOLUTION NO. 21-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00973-SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 6,871 SQUARE FOOT TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN ATTACHED 4-CAR GARAGE ON A 20,724 SQUARE FOOT LOT WITHIN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, HILLSIDE OVERLAY DISTRICT, AND EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRCIT AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF—APN: 1074-531- 09. A. Recitals. 1. Molinar Design, Inc. filed an application for the approval of Hillside Design Review DRC2019-00973, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Hillside Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The applicant is requesting to construct a 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 20,724 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive; and b. The site is bordered by single-family residences to the north, south, east, and west. The surrounding properties are all within the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overlay District; and C. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low(VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District, including providing a grading design that balances the requirement to reduce cut and fill to the greatest extent possible; and d. The design limits earthwork to 500 cubic yards of import, which is necessary to allow the construction of the foundation of the residence. The foundation of the residence is stepped with the existing grade, with the pad at an elevation of 2,092 feet, in conformance with the Hillside Overlay Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.a to terrace the building to follow the slope.The proposed design does PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-24 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 12, 2021 Page 2 not require Variances or Minor Exceptions, and the square footage is compatible with the other residences along Carriage Drive; and e. The residence is in compliance with Hillside Design Section 17.122.020.D.1.e.,which requires that residences in the Hillside Overlay District be designed to fit within a 30-foot high building envelope. The applicant has provided north-south and east-west cross-sections with building envelopes demonstrating compliance with the 30-foot height requirement; and f. Retaining walls are limited to 4 feet in height or less, in keeping with Hillside Development Section 17.122.020.G.1.j. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan Land Use designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential District. The Very Low (VL) Residential designation is intended for the development of detached, low-density residences on individual lots.The General Plan also provides a goal of facilitating sustainable and attractive infill development that complements surrounding neighborhoods. The project is for the development of a single-family residence on an existing residential lot that is complementary to the surrounding neighborhood. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objectives of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Section 17.36.010 of the Development Code states that the Very Low(VL)Residential District is for the development of single-family residential uses with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of 2 units per gross acre. The project site is an existing 20,724 square foot vacant lot that was intended for the development of a single-family residence. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code, including building setback, building height, lot coverage, grading limitations and design. The project complies with the requirements of the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Hillside Overlay District, and Equestrian Overly District. The required front yard setback is 42 feet (plus or minus 5 feet),the required side yard setbacks are 10 and 15 feet and the required rear yard setback is 60 feet. The proposed front yard setback is 46 feet, the side yard setbacks are 10 feet and 15 feet,and the rear yard setback is 60 feet. Lot coverage is 24 percent, well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 25 percent. The overall building height is 30 feet which is below the maximum permitted height limit within the Hillside Overlay District. d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The proposed single-family residence is compatible with the existing residences in the surrounding area and is not expected to create a detrimental impact on the existing neighborhood. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 3 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303, which permits the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone. The project is for the construction of a single-family residence in a residential zone and there is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission has reviewed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-24 HDR DRC2019-00973— MOLINAR DESIGN, INC. MAY 12, 2021 Page 3 the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed,and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12'h day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. APPROVAL FOR: A 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low (VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District at 10839 Carriage Drive -APN: 1074-531-09. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 5. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval. 6. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. 7. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 8. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, and the Development Code regulations. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 2. Provide HOA approval letter for the work to be done at HOA maintained area. 3. Following Development Impact Fees due prior to the issuance of a building permit. Drainage: Transportation: Library: Animal Center: Police: Park Acquisition In-Lieu/Park Impact: Park Improvement: Park Recreation Center: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Drive Appr. Street Trees Sidewalk 5. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 2 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. 7. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 8. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 9. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 10. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 3 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 11. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. This requirement applies to all structures including the pool house and the decks. Landscaping is required to comply with all applicable provisions of Fire District Standard 49-1. Please revise the landscaping accordingly. Fire pits and bowls are required to be fueled exclusively by natural gas or propane. Solid fuel fires are prohibited. Fire District Standard 49-1 has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations and soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the CA Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC and Current RCFPD Ordinance. This project is located in the high fire area designated VHFHSZ and must comply to chapter 7A of the California Building Code as well as Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Standard No. 49-1 for structures and landscape. Where no public sewer is available within 200 feet an onsite wastewater system shall be designed and installed per the Local Agency Management Program Ordinance No. 936. A separate submittal and permit is required for this submittal. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 4 of 5 Project#: DRC2019-00973 Project Name: EDR - 2-STORY SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING WITH A 4 CAR GARAGE AND POOL HOU Location: 10839 Carriage DR - 107453109-0000 Project Type: Hillside Development Review ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 5 of 5 RANCHO4§1= CITY OF DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS — Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site located in the Etiwanda Specific Plan at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place - APN: 0225-181-73. File numbers: SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, and DRC2019-00787. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission take the following actions: Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, Variance DRC2019-00786, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00787 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with attached standard conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Subdivision of 3.36 acres of land into 5 lots for the development of 5 previously single-family residences. The project includes a related Variance for lot depth and a Minor Exception to permit additional wall height due to onsite grades. Background: On June 12, 2012, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18747 (5-lot subdivision), Development Review DRC2009-00010 (5-lot design review), Variance DRC2010- 00963 (to allow for a reduction of lot depth on Lots 1 and 5), and Tree Removal Permit DRC2010- 00974 (to remove one tree). The project site was subsequently sold by the original applicant, and the new owner/applicant submitted revised architectural plans for the project. On August 27, 2014, the Planning Commission approved Design Review DRC2014-00425 (for the revised architectural plans), Variance DRC2014-00536 (for a reduction of lot depth on Lots 1 and 5), and Minor Exception DRC2014-00536 (for walls up to 8 feet in height). The related tentative map (SUBTT18747) was eligible for an automatic two-year time extension of the approval period of tentative maps in the State under Assembly Bill 116. This bill was approved on July 11, 2013and extended the approval period of the subject map to June 12, 2017. The approved project was subsequently sold again, and the current property owner did not request a time extension of SUBTT18747 prior to the June 12, 2017 expiration date. That map subsequently expired. The entitlement of the related Design Review (DRC2014-00425) has not expired as the applicant completed grading work on the project site, exercising the underlying approval. Site Description: The vacant project site is approximately 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres) in area with dimensions of approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). A 20-foot- wide community trail is located parallel to the north property line, with a 15-foot-wide private equestrian trail located along the west property line. The subject property generally drains southeasterly with and elevation change ranging 1,462 feet along the north property line and 1,448 feet along the south property line. The existing land uses and the General Plan and zoning designations for the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay ANALYSIS: A. General: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into five (5) lots for single-family residential development and construct the previously approved five (5) single-family residences. With the exception of the lot depths of two (2) of the proposed lots, all lots comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. Individual lot areas range between 20,230 square feet and 31,940 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum of 20,000 square feet that is required. The minimum average lot area is 25,828 square feet which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 that is required. The depth of Lots 2, 3, and 4 exceed the 200-foot lot depth requirement, while the depth of Lots 1 and 5 will be approximately 135 feet. The applicant has submitted a Variance requesting a reduction in the required lot depth on Lots 1 and 5 (related file: DRC2019-00784). The width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. All lots will be generally conventional, (i.e. rectangular in shape), which will allow conventional house plotting. The project scope also includes a Minor Exception (related file: DRC2019-00787)for walls up to 8 feet in height due to a grade change along the south and east property lines. Access to the lots will be via a cul-de-sac at the current terminus of Arapaho Road. The subject property is located within the Equestrian Overlay District. Each lot will have a dedicated corral area of 24 feet by 24 feet for horse-keeping, and equestrian trails will be 2 provided along the rear of each lot. A 15-foot wide local equestrian trail will be constructed along the east and a portion of the south property line, with trail access to the individual lots either from a private equestrian trial or the community trail to the north. The following table provides the proposed lot dimensions for each lot: Required Provided Compliant? Lot With 90 Feet In Excess of 90 Feet Yes Lot Depth 200 Feet 200 Feet (Lots 2-4) Yes 135 Feet Lots 1 & 5)* Lot Area 20,000 Min./25,000 Avg. 20,230 - 31,940 SF Yes 25,827 Avg. *Variance DRC2019-00786 to reduce lot depth on Lots 1 & 5 B. Variance DRC2019-00786: Similar to the previous request for variance which was approved by the Planning Commission under Variance DRC2014-00536, the applicant has requested another Variance to reduce the lot depth of two (2) of the proposed lots, Lots 1 and 5, to be less than the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan, Figure 5-2. Lots 1 and 5 will be at the north and south sides, respectively, of the proposed extension of Arapaho Road. The applicant proposes a lot depth of approximately 135 feet for these two lots. Each of these lots will be approximately 175 feet wide in excess of the minimum 90-foot required lot width. The lot areas for Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square feet, respectively. The required minimum lot area is 20,000 square feet. The proposed setbacks for each of the subject lots will be defined normally, i.e. the location of the required front, rear, and side yards will be similar to that of conventional lots. Facts for Findings: The purpose of a Variance is to provide flexibility from the strict application of development standards. In order to grant a request for a Variance, the Planning Commission must make a series of findings. Generally, these findings focus on unique or special circumstances applicable to a specific property. The findings of facts below support the necessary Variance findings, which are required by Section 17.16.030.E of the City's Development Code: Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objective of this Code. Fact/s: The proposed residential subdivision is an in-fill project with limited reasonable lot configuration options. The overall north to south dimension of the project site is approximately 331 feet. The project site is bound on all sides by existing development. Therefore, there is no opportunity to acquire additional land, specifically to the north or the south, which would allow Lots 1 and 5 to be greater in depth. Reducing the number of lots to allow for greater lot size is not reasonable as most of the proposed lots are already significantly larger than the minimum required for this development district. Finding: That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same zone. 3 Fact/s: The project site is located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of that street with Choctaw Place. The project site is bound to the north, south, and west by existing residential development and associated improvements. The extension of Arapaho Road will generally bisect the project site. Alternate alignments of the proposed extension such as shifting it further south or north are not possible because of the limits imposed by technical standards for street design including minimum dimensions for street width, curve radii, and cul- de-sacs. The project site was part of a larger parcel that was partially developed with a telephone switching facility on the east side. In May 2006, the larger parcel was subdivided into two (2) parcels. The part of the property that was developed with the telephone switching facility became a separate parcel, while the larger, undeveloped part of the property was sold to the current owner (the applicant). As the telephone facility occupies the entire smaller parcel, it was not possible at the time of the subdivision, nor is it possible now, to consider the option of a street connecting the project site with East Avenue that, in turn, could have provided the applicant the opportunity to propose an alternate subdivision design. Finding: That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same zone. Fact/s: The overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). Requiring that all lots be 200 feet in depth would necessitate a re-design of the subdivision. This would cause a different set of challenges. All lots must have public street access and the extension of Arapaho Road will be an east to west direction. In order for the depth of each lot to be 200 feet, the long axis of all lots, i.e. the axis along where the lot depth is measured, also would have to be in an east to west direction. The only way to reasonably accomplish this would be to eliminate one of the lots. However, the result would be excessively large lots relative to the existing properties in the neighborhood and the development district in general. Furthermore, the orientation of the long axis would not match the long axis of the other properties within the existing residential development to the west that have primary frontage along Arapaho Road. This will affect the location of, or preclude altogether, improvements such as room additions and accessory structures as the setbacks would be oriented differently as well. Finding: That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zone. Fact/s: The principal purpose of the minimum lot depth standard is to allow horse keeping, while still maintaining a minimum separation of 70 feet between horse corrals (or similar equestrian facilities) and dwellings on neighboring properties per Section 17.88.020.13 of the Development Code. The reduction in the depth of the subject lots from 200 feet to 135 feet will not be in conflict with this requirement as it will be offset by the width of each lot. Each lot will be an average of approximately 175 feet wide; the 4 minimum lot width in this development district is 90 feet. The applicant has demonstrated on the plans that horse corrals can be plotted such that they are 70 feet from the residence on the adjacent lot. Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square foot in area, respectively, which will exceed the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet applicable to the development district of the site. Finding: The granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s: The reduced depth of the subject lots will not affect the neighboring properties and/or property owners. Practical differences in the physical attributes/characteristics between the lots in the surrounding area and the subject lots will be limited. Separation between structures and common property lines will be consistent with existing residential development within this development district. The overall area of Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square feet, respectively, similar to the lot areas of the neighboring properties to the west at 13186 Arapaho Road and at 6323 Choctaw Place are 22,165 and 21,162 square feet, respectively. C. Minor Exception DRC2019-00787: The applicant submitted a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet along the a portion of the east and west property lines (adjacent to Lots 4 and 5)and along the south property line. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls is 6 feet. The additional wall height is necessary due to the grade change between the project site and the adjacent lots. The reduced lot depth of Lot 5, the lot configuration of Lot 4 (side on) and the 15-foot-wide equestrian trail along the south property line make it impractical to add earthen slopes at these locations. The additional wall height will be most visible from the developed lots to the south, the existing equestrian trail and the Verizon switching station to the east. The findings of facts below support the necessary Minor Exception findings, which are required by Section 17.16.110.E of the City's Development Code: Finding: The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. Fact/s: The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low(VL) Residential and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact/s: The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots. 5 Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. Fact/s: The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house and the property line wall. Finding: The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. Fact/s: The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. D. Neighborhood Meeting: A neighborhood meeting was conducted to gather input and comments from the owners of the surrounding properties within 660 feet of the project site. This meeting was held at Summit Intermediate School on February 6, 2020. Several property owners from the surrounding community attended. Although none of them had any specific objections to the project, there were questions relating to the drainage and wall height. The applicant's consultant, W&W Land Design Consultants, addressed the questions and there were no additional concerns. E. Trails Advisory Committee: Staff determined that it was not necessary for the Trails Advisory Committee to review the project as they had reviewed and recommended approval of the layout of the trails network, and the applicable technical/design standards, for the original previously approved project (SUBTT18747). The subject project has trails network with a substantially similar layout. F. AB52 Tribal Consultation: Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on January 15, 2020, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation responded to the notification and requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. G. Public Art: The project is exempt from the public art requirement which does not apply residential subdivisions with a density of equal to or less than four dwelling units per acre. CEQA DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning (February 27, 2021) and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition 6 of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement) by developing an infill parcel of land surrounded by residential development. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Very Low, and the Development Code zoning designation for the subject property is Low Residential (VL) Residential District. The proposed subdivision will create 5 single-family residential lots consistent with the underlying land use designations and compatible in size and configuration with neighboring residential lots. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 5, 2021, the property was posted on April 7, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (65 parcels) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 6, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan Draft Resolution 21-26 of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 Draft Resolution 21-27 of Approval for Variance DRC2019-00786 Draft Resolution 21-28 of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2019-00787 Conditions of Approval 7 is -9- �i I, C ,assia sr ' 'r •e'' `. ," m -- Cassia St - T A - p�aPaho Rd r � �oPley D pleY D opley Dr Chickasaw RA hickasaw R ". asa kasaw Rd 1 R S { n CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 08 C Z -52 C 0) r- Q � V � � ago TRACT NO . 20152 r_ C � 1 - i 16 v t 2 9 § BENCH MARK: C'n n P 1 e T 1 ~ Ib.87 155.06 5 . 02� . • 3 N ® 1�1� n C„O.R.A. BM # 10090 ELEV = 1534.37�4 NAVD 88 C F o 1 IL , �, N �, 2 BRASS DISK IN CONC. CURB STAMPED CITY OFlq- �: �, o , °6 =. r , 07 2 - - 21 o - „ a2 = SOUTHEAST �+ 3 rn , a O RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10090 1987 AT 2° CORNER OF SUMMIT AVENUE AND ETIWANDA AVENUE, AT b _- a a 1 17 °3 4a a � W � L _ _ 35x.7SY _ 5e — ,as_ss 1 END OF CURB RETURN. Eti3l3T-STli OYERft ES1iT . ' t 0- EST n ES1tT , N � . ,Q6.2t 145 � 745-5't . 3$ 39 �8 ;,-Z� ?$ Ptn. Lot I 131k E $ Za 23 �$ s208 - _ _ _ _ - -� I LEGAL DESCRIPTION 20 I9 a THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN °' e"22 _ 167 THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, zs`4z, 6229 AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SITE UTILIZATION MAP T 4g -- MAS r i ;1 V1 44 � / TENTATIVE MAP NO. TTM 18747 IS A SUBDIVISION OF THE 07 4ti.b °�5° /� p �a 622.5 TREE LAND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. ------ ° °' 0 4.0 � / a � A CXG 3s PARCEL 2, OF PARCEL MAP NO. 16969, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, } * 37 �'= 38 o i° 7 i STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 213, °$ 21 `* `, � r 56 1 6?4/ �29 91 PAGES 90 AND 91, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE a .0 o / ' OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.46 60 o �� 4I a 4 g SITE ADDRESS 5� 6� s { 3° 62 ` 1 C EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 6- 62�i 29 UO I RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 3 5 ® AC , _ - — d r, f7 m m 2 `L1�ti 45 t _ 12 32 \\ S`' ti. , r UTILITY PURVEYORS: RD_99 Cal d1 gj16 \ ti� �$ 07 7 �2�� o �� 62 s2 �It �ss o2 5 ELECTRICITY -_87 St ® 46 ' SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 3{1 3 as t6 34 43 44 0 C . SOUTHERNCALIFORNIAASCO. Z8 33 ; z° 44 I _GAS a 629T 0.0 e� I U C G C 167.55 2711_�6 4 ou 2l 7.7 i i 7 4.84 237{.91 tiL $ r 385 . 4 WATER & SEWER ISO ' ' la o ibo ib 44d d3(J' 44 CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 26 25 24 23 22F,.318 10440 ASHFORD STREET, i _ H - Es q RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730-2799 27 n " C) TEL: (909) 987-2591 f f •' a co 0Par. 2 s VL d 36_21 160.53 ]3 209 a (U4 GROSS / NET AREA: 03 - - - - - -- flko h 3.36 AC. m ' GROSS AREA: 146,429 SF, 3.36 ACRE n Par. t F.32? i Zg ® 1 @ y .gig 33 33 6 71 °' � VER � � I , DISTURBED AREA: � a 04 ZON 21 a � - a I 146,429 SF, 3.36 ACRE � tt s 02 52 .3z3 z°� 44d.96: e °�° 4a I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0 Cn 'I\� s32s a s z°9 0 ' 0225-181 -73-0-000 I o � I .. x20 4 J > � J ' �� I (, Q11)a 6,543 r �a OWNER: 24.77 ' 1 53 V► a - 202 �° a _ I LRTZ, INC 4 ' 51 '2 a d2 scU t 2738 PEPPERDALE DRIVE 2.41 6346 - z50 I ROWLAND HEIGHTS, CA 91748 / `'°-- a flz f F t CONTACT: LEO ZHANGoauc d V 1 ` Sg as y '7p_7Bl a 63615 I 6.3�f� a 626-873-0213 , No. 66242 9A8 A , '� Exp. d16-30-22 57 �3 8� of 33 0 1 636J 202 \�111 crvIV- i 63&3 �� I ENGINEER: 9rFo� CA 1$ �° A �d CS 3ff 3 W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS, INC A T 6378 a 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE #1 15. M 65 t4 i , $ O �' Vit.35 ,50 Q UPLAND, CA 91786 2 1i9,73 l.3_ 649-84 , CONTACT: WINSTON LIU, PE (V — _ S (909) 608-7118 LO 66 _iD8.43 i34 145.Q1 .S t _ .... = — — --- -- - -.i — — e I CD a 3 N N ,ze 125 �, „ °s COj=� 11� PTN. BLK. E I - BASIS OF BEARINGS: ad T. N. �g„�,� 8 a Ph. Lot 36 THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF COBBLESTONE LANE, HAVING A 2.62 Ac- I% a �7 Igo BEARING OF NORTH 18°31 '48" EAST, AS SHOWN ON z ( 114 I5 N Is aVL _-_---� a 4 TRACT NO. 12650-3, M.B. 201 /77 O 13 _ _ -- �� �37.36 a 0 _ ( 200 ) 17) L — - 1E� �� _ _EASE a LANOSCAP L $ _ Ta P ET _ __- --�_�n — . 6 1 _ - a 1---=- 07 EARTHWORK a O�Lt� S30RE �R>1►1� HA6 TEMA eE ACES i , Ei11f �T_R 1 , -- =_ - 0R (MAGIo� 0 CY 3 7 u'�i f i3 ^ ,7, oz ° 1.33 AC. E CUT...........2,48 FI LL...........6,750 CY m M Q IM PORT........... 4,270 CY C) 3 ' \' SPECIAL NOTE: C) o N / � Y THE QUANTITIES SHOWN HEREON ARE FOR J � U Z O PERMIT AND BONDING PURPOSES ONLY. Q o 04 a THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY QUANTITIES — O Q a NOTE: ALL PROPERTIES ARE ZONED VL (VERY LOW RESIDENTIAL) WITHIN THE 600'RADIUS. _ PRIOR TO START OF GRADING z Q 0 3 wiz Q o 0 � 5o N NOTE: W U PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE INSTALLED PER w O p APPROVED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS. w C) U w 0 C/) Z O s � w = a SHEET INDEX NOTE: � � Z � J o DESCRIPTION SHEET NUMBER Ln w 6iJ PARCEL IS LOCATED IN FIRE AREA: VHFHSZ TITLE SHEET 1 z L TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2 w Z N DETAILS AND CROSS SECTIONS 3 3 CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 4 COVERALL SITE PLAN 5 ISSUE: a GRAPHIC SCALE PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT 6 w PATE: 12/2'7/2019 0 100 0 S0 100 200 400 CUT/FILL MAP 7 E CHECKED:WL DRAWN:WL BLOCK WALL PLAN 8 I DRAWING FILE: 1613CG I n'rl (IN FEET) PROJECT NO.: 1613 w 1 inch= 1CM T o SHEET NUMBER: 0 0 Z a S U BTT20152 SCALE: 1"=20'-0" \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613Cg02-tm.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:32:21 PM, Adobe PDF I 60.0' Ili D y U l c .0' 30. ' �' I" -� \ C �� D � N y � I II o � � I II cow C� z �� o ��� y Wj ✓ L r ✓ � II II �O �1 G� D N � L I (n z �` S II L� _ U) z \ � U� Na c� I L\: L 2c I II II I a�,, cn z l � � I ��` D � -J L �• ' � J II I � III � � � � � ✓ L � c� � �� I L� I �s� ��S J �! I s� co L3 O J 13& m � � � 9 \3 L II NJII 1�, s� ��s2 (7 13 N00°10'43"E, 331 .37 \ �c / 123.3' o 0 148.0' 0 0 — — — — I — — — — — — — I Z co X .fly C Q L. 0'0� s� D c. �J F— C� c9 O �s I i � �- �� I J� b� So Q I ,o'09 c L� ✓ �\ 30.0 I I '� � � (� r p I co CO)S �c � I 2 � o �' 30.0' D I c N I J S � ♦ � ,�, � w o0 It - I D J IAr\ I I F- Ps I I Y R 100.0' \ f G� 2C r m - D So SN 4.0 = a \ 9 I I l J z Z I O � 7.0' o z� � I 1 113.2, S� J CJl 0 // DSO O mom J Sz I G O zmnW L 0 i r — — 6, n / O 00, 0 I � o o \ o II I zD o �,0� \.. ass r6o l , Q � I-- c O m o l i W M I (� D 7 l 0. D O0 (n 0. � �� Li L c� oM KoN I I I d, CL 7� ✓ �' r� zDO� mN '�� ic l.. Q 0z � r I I 0 � I J m m So o XS� D L. 2 Z 1\3L c ��c I I m o I �c I 9� y r I N 9�c O m J Z- � � � �J I I � � I I O r O � m0 m � 20.0' 10. � I �� I N �� I I m � CO) N I 20. ' �,=' P z � < p 110.0' I � o I I I � � � �� o I I I I zo mn r I I l �� � r�r CJ > D � � m ICn cn Z I Cn I I sic l l � � 10.0' f o D oo rn C 9 o �c o o l c mz o�, P " � _ o V) (0 m > N 0 w M �e — m 1 19.8 1 10.0' SZ ' o CO m I �s 00°09'08"W, 331 . 8' �� D I c� o � jo o � �S �� � C) Cn S� ;r- C (� L �, GJ o �- fq � mN � �s7 ) 2c mm � `n U) I D 7�� I ` � D n J �? _ 5 Cm0 �7 m Z� �� l�: �� L7 3 T = �Z QD C) C X � c � R. 0 ,1 I I m o 0 � cDMx -UMXv G) _ = I I G) D 7 1 m C m < 0 M O cn N O m m 0 m D z Mo N M m r- o �_ o 'T z z = 00000 ICY, o � O zU) m > ICJ � � � � � C Cn D � C7 0 0 II II II II II II II II II II I I p D D O � C N m � m m � cn Csl N a0 o z o U) o D 000DDC2rD (n z o mC i-> M0 = I I O Wo o D > r M _ � O DZ � D I I o O Cn D z Z o n O � oZZ � o I I r I M Z N m cn 0Dr m =OmD � I I 0 D �? (n m r m 'T' r m D N ry w ry N N ' ry o m c m Day Creek Blvd. Day Creek Blvd. 0 z z w w � m O 0 r m 0 CJi -I (A � � J � D > W D � < '�' = D � 0 N cDn � z o � ooN) M (D (A � rn m z D Or m m � m cn m r m fv L O D z D M r � 70 K m O� _ rn z __ < m m m z � ^ '<' _ o rQ 0 �n m r r p z C m C/) cn O c� Z Z 70 � � z rM1 cn c� rn < < o C O Q IVCU (n cn cn cn cn rn m D r \ m W < m � � r r N c� r « � mcn � rro z O M m 0 I I N D O _ = amo = m OC D r. m N z I I cln 0 � n D z o 0 K o I � z -0 � Z Z II II II II II II II II II I I D Iry oo � m m ; D = o O 0 0 I o) I rn rn rn � �2 D c� O z , o o _ C) C� � � � � cncncncncn D 0 r o c'' J o D z Etiwanda Ave. Etiwanda Ave. Z7 M z .Z7 N D � r0 � � rr0 �i r ( M U) D -� co ♦�nn M rM MC/) � � C» r � o v, D cn � � mM = � � Z � 0 ry Cn o z `° D cuCn T 0 r Z > J G7 W G� C O .ZmI �j C z Ro (A - -- - o r- � Z n 0 T D W = C) 0 fTl O Q 70 ( 1 '1 D z 0 0 c � DC D Q O r- O X m M - � m X r X p M m East Ave. East Ave. C71 N 0 O = x � = D N PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: m � z m m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 -01 REG/S6 ° 0o N C oy x Z �F W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc W o EAST END O F ARAPAH O ROAD o �, N N RANCHO C U CAM O N GA, CA 91739 o N Civil Engineering ° Subdivision ° Land Planning 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 = W W D N o N N �` TEL: (909) 608-7118 ° FAX: (909) 946-1137 m 0 ::E Cn DRAWING NAME: co TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 20152 \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\l613Cg03-details.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:36:19 PM, Adobe PDF m r III __ G� D III x� � c� � III r- X r- N 1 - - - - - -/I _ O O - - - - - - - - - J �0. z Dom i6.0' 'T' z I ►t -- D 0) oo MCx m I ao m (I Cl cn m cn o � cx � � oX X zz o - Z m z Q 27 MIN. a Z / I � 0 0 M I G7 � rT'Ic� / I I � jo x LL 1% MIN. o I X � 6.0' U, 5% MIN. ry Wm I � z D c� " r 10' \4 rx n (� o i o = 1 m 0 0 1 z MIN. I 0x I � � coon I + � I+ Cam I nm pX o m I m � I cn � 00 I � � I 9 - 0 � � Z = OX I Cl) cn r0 00 6.0 m � m � y n ) I < x Do 1 � m � � _ c� z I nz � z 2% MIN. m Z � � Z I " M0 -T1 oG I M0 � z " 0 N D z � cn 0 1 6.0' Z 0 0 I ;'I __ -0 CA = I � � o Q = " D oo D G5 � Ln , D I+ Z co 0 00 o p 90 0 o 00 0 m 7\ 0, rnrn = o Z I pX ? � o � -1 ri m 0 I 00 r W 0 C7 c� m I rC cn cn N 00 -< o 6" MIN. N r� <" 0oo C� ozin I < X � z � �" �zl`q -9 : / o=co O M � I moo? o � I � � Z � I �, / oo z cn II" ? M o 18.0' c� D 0 I / N r -C o cn 8" MIN. < II" o � N = �� m r I+ I CD C � —\ K / oo " r w D o� o TYP. X o 0 -- - I 0 z l 07 -U D w O � r r I Z 0 c,, I 0 � r C" D ? n x Z D.F. SHOWN m o 7 O ao � II" I 0 m � !o I m o r F.L. ON PLANS v' 0x III II cx II� 0 1 o CO I 0.2 D Icon U� o CTI _ 0 o ,� 41 D D I I ? N MIN. z o � to o z � m0 I+ xr- = 0 D = 00 Dp � r Z I I I I O �� Z m Z N Oo m m °' N �`0 `° F.L. N 0CTI ? o � � N io la � � Now 8" MIN. o D = I 0 00 m A °� TYP. z oz I M0 I v z I.• I m I X I. 1 � � 0 m I' N 1 r0 0 I o 0 / 6' MIN. M Z z I o D -11 O I I I o ,, � o I O I I � O I `n 0 I DI O ccoo -0 I 01 o ro I v,1 0 0 �' O �' �' D 0 mp III MAX. 3' FILL I 0 0 W W I rn D omm � J 0 I -1000 m I DZCo 1 D 17-Q I 60 0 -Mo0_ � N I rn O I -10 W c) m I MAX. 3' FILL cn m D 0 o o 0 I DO I � � m X I cn o Mo I m0 I I K = 0 � 0 z arm Cli m I 00 D0 � caN 1 � � � cn 16.0 �CTI � � oz I ; � `A � I p w m c� I I I o fi 18" o CA I N I I+ z = z Cn I o� I O n Z _ I I 1 0 - owe � c�n z I O m NZN � O I J r0 I CA N D > J � 00 -n r � I 00 I m r Dm _ O r �1 m I cr I m o (n I 1 = DO I 1 �� c � � c� < = I ? )G) J 0 � -U0 oo D r I 1 � 0r\.� 0n O N I � 70 m o0 ICTIkn O m m I - - - - z x" o M D , I � � D � oo = N n n M � m II" O N I n o 0 I z z = D = ' p - I - 000 _ z � II I 6.0' car`? � = o O I O C � O I o D r � I � R. o 00 1 o D I - - - -mm - po I v, z � D I .0 x I 0 G) o cz 0 o m I � DC I m M0 I M0 I rn � m x � N 1 � N I vfv z CTIw m i DC10 D N D N I °�' VARIABLE M Z7 r r r C7 G7 D o I o II" II" I N o PIPE SIZE 12" MIN. r I�oq PER PLAN m - - - - - -- Q u" o I u" o �� Z < m 1 o I o U C �. - - I D m i - - - - _ - IV m m z I 1 0 0 - X 0X 6.0' mom c„I I CC 140 M X U) 0 O z 0 D O o I o N `� � I 00 o = 0 KDo � � � I i � o N) - Z > - o � 0 Zoo _ N z 1 0 � cncn O Z7 n Gym (� O � m 0 I D C 1 rn - _ � X -UC c� D , I o �, r o M r r cn m - J 0) 0 o � Duo u I I �, � � � o � � o D 0 � D0? II" o I t o -1n n m z rn m p I 0 I o W '��� > m < N ODG� 0z� m I I o -U I z m DAM >`�o � 0 I z m -n I r- I D mom= �u0 m0 I I � � � o I �?� o° oN� � W I N U)CO>Z p�z C I I ro0 - - - - D ormoZ�oo m�0 �rT1N� I UM I - r < �cnm 0z C^� I MAX. 3' FILL 1 m o zrrn�� D0 Dr;u I o�OO m I z o �0�:< N .� = 0 I o .0 onz ��cn � I C z cn � 00 Zo — 11 I �� c� I w D � rn m � z0 J o I m �I � I+ I N io"f � _ _ _ v, D I r ?I o - v, 0) I �? 5.0' DRAINAGE cn/ � O I z = 00 I J EASEMENT N o 0 0 6.0' o m MAX. 3' FILL o I rn I � I I+ ' o z i 6.0 " " m I m 0 I ' � I I N o� �I �Z� N m o ,0. I I om Do I N �► Iz cn � o I � o ) o I o � m 00 / _`, I � o Dp i � o / ' 0x I i= N I o0 I oz D I 00 1 M0 / z I 00 I 0 � 16.0' I c� 0 / oo = ID r / om 0X I 0 = 0 I� II O / m I io DF 0 I� w / cn c, > � o I O I I � rn Z IO\q �! n 1 I I c'' Ln D o G) I m I o � o I � . . . � . . . . . KD _ mZ I z I I I m U! � m M 0 I MAX. I I IDoI �, O Z D N I � 3 FILL cCn can C3i < II� 10 I o o m - - — I O I II" o I D m o Mo m I I O � m0 0x Cr I co m I D n 0 m 0 I D MAX. 5' FILL 1 I O - X I r = 1 u c� r- �I N D I � 0z I 1 o m � � o c� - - - - - m m 1 I 1N3A3S`d3 D 7) 0 o N CD o I I 30VNIVa(] ,0'6 r �_ n ,.,., m " O -U 1 cn 0 no Zo Xzm I I Drn 000 � o 101 IX I C c� I D � � roo z ► I r � I - - - - - - - - - 0 = = zo 8.0' o oo � I N CTI O " " ro 0 I 00 o 'a � D Co - - - � I N � O I �� m r�l - o c� 16.0' - - --- -- m D I cn cn �� r 00 000 o0 1 c- o � I - , 2rv_ ao � -0 � D r � r`;'I n G-) - r0 CO z = r • I 00 O r � � mz0 0 0101 o Om mm mom z � G� 00 om 0 _ 0 M > m r Z � pO W DEC � � N � 0 0 = = � � � o � � p zmo z n0 � � 0 x m Dm mDp I _ � � CO m Ui Z X omm � � Do zo mDm I N rn Duo � C7Cn � O r00Zm m 0 N 1T7 m = n m D r Cn X I o q _ k � D o Z � � - - - - 0 mzc� - m m 0 8.0' � IV m I / r 01m > :X-,) - - - - Iy � C71 oz � z � I+ N m0 / z 8.0' / z 0 0 m 0 O = x � = D N PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: m z m m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 ayS REG/S,F . W C oy x Z �F W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc W o EAST END OF ARAPAH O ROAD o �, N N RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 o" N Civil Engineering a Subdivision o Land Planning 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 = W W D N 0 N m N �` TEL: (909) 608-7118 e FAX: (909) 946-1137 n N can DRAWING NAME: co DETAILS AND CROSS SECTIONS \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613Cg04.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:45:26 PM, Adobe PDF I I II I D II I I I I I I X t_ c I I Lj �� ✓ L J n I I c � t M) "� O II II \cn► , \ r L yL I-? ✓ L I L I I II r 11 >0 j ("� 1 \ , o UI 30.0' 3 �� ��Q\` z L\% tea, (� O 00 rp L�3 ,o cx-n � s� II II ao I (Z 9-b �� -) D '11 am, o L cS N z ,s S II �� �.�) L\" � i L' co., L�, '1'1 p c) 18, II 1 p X LZ L I m o �� z cn I II N `�� o 1 v z ` s co I �I o II II s 2� 01fn O D_ 01- v I s J c "So v �s r^ �Cs`� O J ON II C�zS m X� S p� 1 � Wa - T C mc) 2C �v Dm �' 2C I �7�6 x X r J 1 .0' 8.0' 1 <J J o J I 6J - - - -- --�.- - - - - - - = - - - - - -- - - - - - - tea- - - - --- - _ 0) 0) 0 - - - - - - 1 I CD) 60.20 TW S��� I 65.30 TW n , = cn 67.60 TW o 0 0 r m 54.20 TF U) °' "��J 7.30 TF m o - Do 59.60 F - �iS =6.0' I` ��` I I ° k „ , 57.55 TG o O Cn O � N 0 10 43 E, 331 .37 H1 0, 57.05 INV o H1=8.0, m m-- - - - - - - _ = o x_ E E E f f f f E E f f 148.0 N 53.7f3° - - - - - - - 1.8 °... �... O f E � f 123.3 54.70 �/.I _- ... ...y �...--.. �. ... C - - - - ,,I�IIIi,-�- m f 54.39 1 FL o, ^.. < N = Cn cn II f E E�E E f E. 1 .. MI..• J.. L�FiP ,� rn rn O rn^ r M Cn 2% MIN . -58.50_ 1 0 II o 0o f E ' Cn z CT1 Cn CJ1 FG 1 i E CtJ 00 W rn rn� cn ' ° ... I D N oo i�1 in _f S E f•f ,� E < 0 2% MIN, o a) rn I rn w Z rn _ ov' aQ I z o r 66 c)' cn o r� °' " f f E f f f O - 00 X TI x TI W N F•. �� _.° �CQ f iv U) r v cn c� _ '1 %a: 8' 0. 58.77. u: '0 I cn 20.0' Cj Z E E E E f f E - �/ .Y ..k• - /•�•X OI -v f E $. VJ I- f Cn Cn F' Z v I � C F Y f 9 O 4 E E VJ J7 '• .. .. - R� E E Cn Cn� � �� �' ,I �' IIVV I FCA �1 �1 ' '� �C/V C/V ,. .` Cn U1 (n v,OCsl � •w nor s f f E E f E E \ Cn r� Q1 N N r n °• >7n.'c. 7a T. `• k7�:. .� I L4 I \ 0 M N ( zo 0 t 1-59-.13/ 59.78 �: • FS � R'' I� Ll l Cn cn t. v 1 o I C� J f f E f f f E N Z FS 70.0' CA oo I z E E f E O I 0'02� I 0 ` N �s �, I o I c� 2.0% N /c(A c�Cn ,. /� I r� I f- A �cP Ti GS 7 O v v J cyl % ' 37S f Jf f f E f ,-i CLn TI 1.1' (Jl Z l ,0'8l ,0'8l o} 0 59.50 ii ZC oro f f l E E cn D --Q ,0'0� o f FG cn D 13.0 o� O 0 f f E f f f E I 0 -- v, I NI '0� Cn �„ 57 �� fECE.n♦' f ,O �Z co NN I I� I.` NN g'�� NO 40.6' to 1 a, cn rn z- �� \ D v C I Cr oo ! oq � N I D 0 z 111 � cn 10.6% cn C 3i o :Z c� 0 �q I m c� z �� U,N No r 3.2� fe 0 �' ' I 0 rn 11 1 j �, ,o'o N �N S s �, • 8.0 �, („ Cn v, I g, I L z cr o j I I o I ✓ n o \ r T1 . 2.0% I D I L�3 ' o 1 I zv o N o 1 .o I 001 1ti v' O \ 1 C _ � O I _U � Icol O N � �' m \1 Cn Cn A \ O 6.9 I �� U1 010) Cn 0 -' > Yw Ln rn ` �+n J N N 0 O O D Cn 1% J � N cn N. 0 2. � S Cn > cn w cn � Cn \ '. i i` iQ 1 0 \ 0 0 30.0' J ✓ � o o m � o 0 00 ­1 --1 rc) 2.0% �_ m I �S CA N� o � � , rnJ � n �� �. : r zp� 1- I �f � 70.0' I , 60 W �, - �, 0 I I o z o Cn Cn � m I r Cn Cn Cn E ' ^1 t` ✓ \ ` E V l D rn N 4... �::�' �;'�-i =' _� a, O ao, cn ��, n - N g,2% o N v, o I I : 6rt f �C O J J f f E ^ E - J ti r �Yf �c ON 4,6 "� FS 1 \ � r o N cfl u' Cn cn �S cn 2.1 XS� E�f f f " F> .. 4 C�lpO s CO C,J C) ° jo TI < E E E f .f f f I TI J . `:. U7 U7 O O f E E f Af ffE r n �� I 7� ♦�:' ti1L �y� 0) _ I E E E E �J.It •.4 �•�:M Cpp}} _.:` C i.7.q. .�. (�tt��t.a � UI n � (' �f f •.:t '.. :5/9.`: `.�V.' .i� .t5 .+.`w. ,C r t'p, � 1 E f E f .l.' .t •:• IF' TI J \ �r E f E f E I J Cn Cn ?T , c :: :{.. gip.. Cn„ N OIp E E f E E E f J •:�. r R r C f.[^ - `.0 .�.. '• ~ E EI If f E f J O N :C/! c.` q (�..! T�v E E f f �' `� \ 5-0.005 �a�� f f E f f E f E f E E f I D rn �� Q � �n .:�•�:• +`` •'. .�Y .?. �.' (� ^ cn f f f - J 'f�.. ��..• f ff E E E f f f f f f f1E 1 1 ----------- 0 o Z 53.67 3.8% r...r•.. O _1 /� \\ o E E E f f f E f 7 f CrJ W \ < O`--FL r _. U1 U1 fi r\ (0 fl f f f f f E E f f f -41 II 0 0) v J �� (•', •� \ ...��• ° '``' oY J z .0 0 = O E f f E E E E f f f�+ET f E 'I. I Oob O f � f E TI E E E E D< Ln r C� f E f E E f f E f ^, - 0A0 �7 -0 00 •'E ff E E f f f f E ff - �/ 0 1 � f f E f.v f E f f E \•' ------ (MnT ! f E E f V I r�• Cn Cn 1 PROPOSED 3:1 SLOPE S7� OD 32.43 �� �i 56.58 Ti �l , Nm� r� 1� �� O F - - - - - - - / Cn FG 0' Cn CnOx M N JCn f f E EE E f V D D v \ ✓ Y \ m vm� \ C)o � �mz m N 0°° o , Cn � Cn z N O_U x oT� o \ O Cn C0i1 R38.0' O ,� 0 2 Q f c) o Ti 0 6.00 TW I A/svc� J 0 / o co N < S O z I Ti �� r c1 Ti //�. r - r om.. D Cn \ ��C o 00 1.0 mmo z�orrn 0 Cn - U,1 z � l ,q J 00 0 0.00 TF L� C J T IW 50.50 z � - Cn �-zio �m�v �o c0io \I o N 2c 1� N �\ u'I =6.U�`� s FG < z o 0 \ m o 1 I \ 0 rvl= < � z � o o Z o � \ - C.T� r. 50.50 0 ,� �S �:� 43SOdO8c _ - _ 57.74 T 3p 0' Cn I "� III3dO _ - g� L., ,i 57.24 FL U n a: Ln S °V� � o /-CY) I �� o '•°• �" 1 � o: .';.- 'i~ ;,6.�•F. � N O N I 1 � \ I \: L�3 41 - 00 R E7.. > :.�. i -J oo ��. �, 01 cn cn ��� Cn 0 Cn C,� ;•� °\ c�i� N - o - 'c i _ III N o rn //• G1 MIN. 2% IN. N Cn o z F O�Q _' PR(� OSED 2:1 SLOP\ �_ / ` 1 .r..• �, :. ,.i,y ... I �c II v " v 51.87 T _ _ w r c� r-: s �,N / a�'o S=0.005 �� I � % o �. '' o c"O 85�L ' . �' st• °° �� `S 00 Q \ cn CUn Ln S A. :ip U, 10 Cn21.2 o 1 C 7 c r -� z �✓ C N - - - J / / Cn W Ima I 1 Q 1 \ -ri . ,. N tir. ✓ r E7. r :II 1 \ (J ✓ J �4 N N `�F'Q: r. Z \ �_ �, N \ _ : � '��. ��o�T� N00 an `n I I <J D C N = I cn -n CA a, Cn D N I z T' �, "55? 0 . . 54.00 TF J - C ✓ O - co Ti cn o o T�N c� }�I o < o r o0 T7 rn � Cn z =6.0 N cn j I II r 1 I � cn I I 56.0 Oo rn ; < II I fTl 1l _ cn _ L 00 o, I ! \ �" O m :�I m FG w Gi` N• o IV 0 z 0 1 r I J (� O o z �I l °tj;` c»: o O II < II �� If I I F o En s 2 z i N �, LD �, 4' 1 I �, �, '': j. Ln -n 0) Cn zN �I �' Cn N� 0 00 �I I _ 11. ' r O • I I o1 O00 L C �- �� L L B 0 0 J �r 1 O }�� ,ern Tarn :r.;. O -n o C I J L 2 O I-U IZ� (no wcnrn O + � J IV I m L� 0 L GJ 15.4 C,, �� N I <0 I I o ? N I O 9.5' I I ICn I mau y � � n j (� v z rn Cn `L_ �1 o01 '. c0„ 1 ,T1 11 I r-U) ITI n O l 1 O I r 01 /�+ 0-0 U) 1� ✓� 00 r m� Q r > -n = Cn U1 ,� rn Z 1 V N I I v, I cn O cn • �m �o s 0 II 1 1,4, \o m o 1 ov22m l 0 II I' � O cn I Cn } � 5.2 r �I Do \p rnTi P, I - r 0 -U zv I �_I o 29.8 Cn I coo JLT o c)o ? \ � I rrn 1 � v, 1 _ 201.0 1 I � �� �o °r° mx IV I411 U' o 70.0' m� II "'" Z� �0 0� XDmZ I �N N � f �N o 0 00 S TI r N' � U1 1 ,� N \ m r C pp= I N Cn 2 TT O I ! oo c� � r*I m m DI 70.0> �L �I c Cr W 04 < S N N CD\ '0 x \ j �z\ EI: f TAN - �� I I O� 13.9 �'L 8 /� �' I c� � \ m�r \ f E E N 00 -I t a, (� 15.5 L 1456 C ` C. I I D m Cn cA z \ E f E I Ti rn Cn rn I 20. o rrD f \ .T lI 1 f f f f EE W '�o O 00 \ I I �� E f O Ln 1 O �n O o = l� Jv EJ��A f E E f 52.84 � I N v FJ , I l , \ ' O Tl (Ln 0 1 l/v 'O f E\f E f f 85.6 I 70.0 '\r s\ C, C, - I , v VJ 1 ^zDo G! f f E 3F.(� ff ff f E 10.0 �2 i °' NO ,�y.�' 20.0 1 :/DO � J 14 EffEE f ffE 2.0' I I \ 1 � O N r 0 i E f 1f ' cn rn 5 .90 / 0 4''✓ N�- ju _ / Dmv J 1 fE f\\ a'. 1452- - o � FL- Cn145 �T�rn Ti / ?s9. � �4v vm� < \ 1 m U7 / 1 EEL•_f f f f ,f E E 1 f f 1-1 \ \ N N f E N TI Cn ��O-) l 101 U, _�. .ice'••E f f v! �M O 1 I I 0 m E FE f 00 U7 �A •� ((� f f O� �J.� T� f f E E E f f f V I A V' /ram f f E f f f f E I I Sg E45 f f a� f >:� f 0Q) G' 00 E EJ1 f E E E f E E E E f f /�fT TyTy�� _ \!\\ \ I�Z Fn( E f f \\f f f f Q I,, f f E f A �.�E II .o o f� f E f f f 1 E f f F F E E f f E E D m \V O - f ROPOSED 24 X24 �` f E --� �- f f f 6A rn f \ rTl f f E `y.E. v 01 O) Zl \ f E Rk f/�pJ E f EQUESTRIAN CORRAL \ I O f f 2 07o E f If E E E E f 1f f E O E f E f f E�f f E f f E N CO 1 I m �1451 �J•1 E E f E f f f ((fff f f E • /T1� TI U1 f f f E f f f� f f E f f f f T©t �n o I O O cn 0 00* E 1 E f� f f� V+ E E f TI V/' /•� `E r-y tOs f �F N •• TI 1 m l E f �' o // v 0D /1 a 53.0 `' f f f f f f I f U� f Gi� E E E Q f V/ E f C`/p1f fll ^fET y f f f f E f f A G7 Qp / 4/ E E< E f• O/ r N / O I51.7 V j E N�E f ®E J �1',�J'f f-/T���f1 f E fI f f E f f f J Va E E ��l E 1�4 f 'F�+ 1^1 f�•..{••`J f E .f f f fT�f O \�� T� 1 J 1 1 • E f E 2/ MIN 51.5 o f E• .E /�'1/ Jv-'Vi EYW'' f f If f E f o .f. f © J�l(•�/•VrTI f E f • f E W J 1 FG f f E E f f E E I E E f f I I r o f f E °•'. E f f 1 E f f/ v A J 1 f 1 N � rn� \ ' O \ oo\cn Cn \ - - - y\ Z \\ v I ;J / �� �_ S00°09'08"W, 331 .38' Cn -nL o z o�. \ Cn 1T1Cn \ I O I � Cn / Xm s� ON -n Orn �S rO 1 � 1 WZ)rTI �1oc) ��Zm r JI d, N O(n / ITI X ��/ o 0 v -0 O v- m-D r M X G)J 0 0 W M 0 CHAIN LINK RENCE +6 �I = � � I tr cncn zm �� M� 0�� J cp zoo Mx 0 0 ----- ------ \ II II rn o0 0 o I Z D - z D O 'G � c O -� Z m X---------X-^ x-- x------ -t_x - N Cj \ of o 1 � � m�� mG� r� ODO Sits GJ mow O �mG) �1 � 0Nm rn I „� �r F�� <y �1 Imo �� I (� 'T' �m �v� �mD v r J n m� c Z � �v r �< D �� \ I I II G1 I =Ti m m `5, 'cn J Z v = _ 'I' mo 1 I �� �- I I 11 9.0' I N0 Ll; ✓ ��cmo L L�Z 0 rir D� � D �� \ I I z I \ m Dz 0 yamo z J �� L Z ✓�.� =D S� I J -� �� �W � (� \ I rrl i c C_x M m (� m ��? ✓ 5Zss n m D Ln \ D \gym41 11 1 II �o lo�z� - �J L� ✓ L �c0 L1 0 L, L G it \ 1 I z < -,-� sz o 00 o I� O L.. \ \ \ - -- ---- -x---- --- -x� --- - -- J L CTI �� I �� ASPHALT I '� \ w 41 r z� cn � � nc/) m -u *r-n m <'EE< - m o � m � mm � � C m C < ` c� i <D c� TI c� cn TI r�1 o < < _ rn (n 0 r C c < D O m < <`. V �, z �' o I m cn O c� o : z �I o0 0 I C Cl) Cn c� � 0 D � � c _ � C) ,o��� v m *M fEEEE I c0 D Cn 0 C r 2 M D O D Oo D 2 G) moo �x mx < < I 0 z D D rrl 00 N Z7 II 'CK00 Z� U)U) <<< < - C/ -j Z Z Z D O c�ommm yz N� - I EE<<E = ;":'E.: p D m � D 0 O t� N D p D �. �M r v -0 -0 _q 70 FT1 z� U) � _U Tl Tl � _ C D -1 C7 E'fEE :,•Y:'. I . . D C7 M J � 0 z z = C-)mv0 zf mn < � 70 M X D M 0 � Z z D - DF-0 C D CAI D � CD M . . U� 00 z M C n 3 m Z z c Fr1 - < -0 -0 c) -, U) C7 c�'i��D� Oo 0� no 1_,_I D Cnm� � 07 � 0 = 00 � O I c,, � D 70 � 00 - _ � � >0 -n;0 mO z z �� � 000 = = � � ��0 �1 0 7070 D70 70 0 ITI 0 � 0 = NC7n DD 0 z N C7 0 U)00 �� p � Z G7 C/) � FT1 0 0 Z-71 r � � � � n D D T1 C) z 0 O � � Z Cn 0 �p $ D 00D IC) mo D 0 0CC) oco < zT'IT10 Cn0 O O D r�T1 D m O G7D0 o C O 0 r Mom < o co DOTI OD � M Dm rFT1 m FFT1 Fm � M Cam/) -0 M >70 F_ z Dn D z ffl n 'c z Z r D ZD 0 D (� D �70 0 0 � M r M D C DO n ♦♦^^ o n'� m D O G) 00 z � M Z Czn m D F- m Iv � F- r p z Frl M � 0 m -0 F=T-I < 0 V, m Tl � D p Z D Fz m D \ FzTI ( O � Om C -Cm7 D F1 C z > oD � 70 o � z z � 0 rn � � � rT, OCDC < m r � o z 00 D rT1 z kJ 0 > D T1 II 0 -0 D C/) o DZ � pD FTl fT1 Z M F- FTl 0 � Cn N D \ z 0 �' z � z �F- z z w C77 OD M � 0 � 0 o = X � = D N PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: m M m ' m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 a�S * REG,ST, C oy x Z �F, W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc W o r- r- EAST END O F ARAPAH O ROAD Civil Engineering ° Subdivision ° Land Planning m 8 N RANCHO C U CAM O N GA, CA 91739 N 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 W W D o N TEL: (909) 608-7118 FAX: (909) 946-1137 M 0 ::E � DRAWING NAME: co CONCEPTUAL GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613Cg05-SP.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:28:40 PM, Adobe PDF 50.0' I L\: L� 30.0, 30.0, I U: �o ✓ L I L � � r I I L�. I I r � 10 L\; L�, L .0 X Lam, m x L - m I L�: lam, N z L1 cz, I I L I zcn I I L1 D � _ z cn D p D rm o 17- m I I I I — — —— — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — -L — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -L — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — —— — — — — — - - - - - - - - -� I I N00°10'43"E, 331 .37' f Ef Ef Ef E EE Ef Ef E ff EE Ef Ef 123.3' f f 0 �r� oO II\I I I II I \ \ 14N8.0' r E f E 1 I O/ f f f ffff rz E f q mTNTN M j 1mX O C' . r M f2 O ZO � L o E E `°•09 0D M NN ,o o� N O o.°� D o 30.0' 00 0• (A p DmNZmom0No E ER100.0' O f fff f T CC CCNNI7S1N= JW mm � 1ocao _' �G=� m(nmz— —\ l\:\III \�L \'�c•7^1�\ 1,II1 0I T 1y�°c.S9 I1 �•—E mE E f E E�m E Ef mQr EEE EEE E EE fEwff f fI E—ff If—oE E-E ME EEc�f S o �E 1 . \✓L��Iorr�I :\ � fE/ff fLLEEEtEEfEc E f L�hEIf_fEEfffEfEf�f E Efffffffff��E E-f of fEtEEEfEfffE f f f EffffffEfff O f flE I Ef E E EE f EE Ef fIEf fE f f ffEf E E f fEE f f E EIIE f \f E E Ef f f E E EEf fEE f f E E E f f Ef E fff Ef E E fIIII f f f EEf QTfEAA E E f f II / O f \ T r Z ' f Ef f T 0M Tl TT Nm I zoD Z m N ao0mz r m f EE f E� Z Ef E fffE f E f E f N m ffEff E ^ D >fEfff� NT/� O EEfffE 4 24f.©Et N� III III I No z� m� n \ � Cn ffO> f ff3. om U o CIO z � ;U a O cr o O o0 rnr�rn nOCOV� cm (.060 O) O 0 0 cn 0 U) DM DO � / C \Z m o D cn0 � 0• 5.0' mo mm - - - - - - j o � � c> z D 0 7 0z U 0 -0o � �N0 I mo (n I ND m 0 rmD mm � o C)0K I O z Im U) X ^ Azm m0 20.0 10.0 MN TT mm M N � '20.0 �y 0 c zm N) o zo 70 �Dr Drm 00 CPO, O m m N oz I O vm E U) m M ZW z ff ) E� E E f f ff ^ ^ J D 0 D � 0 <V T D ;a D (I mNOM f \ D m = f N N Cnf E E L0f o X D f mO cn f f ff f E 13 m E E fEE fE Ef E f mmm f f Ef E E Z D m f f f f fflfNE 0 ZX fEO f TOfV OmV)ff f IF f Z D v` f ryf f EE E f f EwE O m Em O) Z E Z v' _ � / O V^^ m K mm w� M � 19.8 � m S00°09'08"W, 331 .38' O DD � cn zD o r m cn l D o < �Dm L m M m m mm 9.0' m zp i K zMm jomm D � � I z m Z c/? z O MT CEO U) - D -0 -0 - D M D m O r0 D TI m 0 .UO O O Cn z Cf) OCn Cn C/) (/) m cTD Z m AO O O M M � � Dr m N z C m D 70z -< o D 0 m M zo 0 m n o CO C Dr—M O D70 rD D m r D M r \ 0 70 70D O co� = D0 o = x PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: F� m m m REG/� z 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION TR 20152 W&W Land Design Consultants, IncZ o r- EAST END OF ARAPAHO ROAD Civil Engineering Subdivision Land Planning 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 9178 '6 N RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 W D 0 TEL: (909) 608-7118 e FAX: (909) 946-1137 M !1 0 � W DRAWING NAME- Co OVERALL SITE PLAN \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613Cg06-wgmp.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:47:41 PM, Adobe PDF M (1) C � 0 Dm �NSZC - C x .0' II 18.0' �, J o -U - - - - - - �Z - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ °iao 1Cn - - - 00 D 0 60.20 T i ��°'�� rn � l 65.30 TW = cn 67.6o TW o 0 0 z 54.600,TF I�� N �N� I >> Hi .0, o F 57.55 TG r m o0 0 � � o H9.68.0 F �' o n m �, N 0° 10 43 331 .37 _ 57.05 INV - - o _ > - - - - - - Z \' m � > � W V f f f f E E E E f E E f E f 53.[TI f� 1 3.3' J 5 70 ��I � .-. �--...---. .�... -- y' --...�... �... - - - - III II'' � G) = !/1 I E f E E f E f fr LE MI ... - FL P FL 41 \ o_ cn cn o � _ 58.50 l/J �. _ - r D N O 0o Ilf f(f E f E f E f f f Ui 1 I z W 00 z CA s� 6i �I VI �l �I 00 L=225�W-0. FG D O � w i-n i-n f'E ^f f, E E E 0, S=O. 2% N. �� o I N . M rn rn r,i rn U, _ I�� ^ rrl boo -E� f �lT E 1 . �l J O 00 l CO TI 00 (n . z W z T� f f E. E f f I N I \/ �/" - 1.9% Et O G) z -� D � � fEE/ O E�f Ef f ffE y o ` I I °° cnr o �r O �� 8.30 8.77 ° 0 O x I� U'I 20.0' Z D f f E E/ E E f f f E E f JV f U1 \ I Z Z (� (� < �I S FS D (/J E F f E E C�I f f Zj -I G7 cn Ur� c0 � C� � Gm z Q^ fff f//F' f f E f f E I f f O �.(� (n I L C� �I GJ GJ � �I �( 3.5% f E / E E f JE f I CJI UI N 0 Tl 00 '` �� <Cn -T1 vJ- " C T! I I 20�'�' N , � UD ,� ^ 59.13 59.78 - 1 c0 � ZVJ E E f E f f f E O C,I �•. L\ � � I r l J J FS FS cn 01 (./) O I I //m� E f f f f f � N r (n � 70.0' I O I V J E f E E E f f O I \ (('''��((�� J cn E ( o Z.Z N N Qs CO I O O O �'2„ E f E E 2.0% Hill 7�` Cp c� o t o I r f C f f ' 0'9 L t0 II 59.50 ��2C �6 _ f E f E TI Cn 1.1 CJ1 'Z I. O� p N 2 2 2 m 00 oo E f : f fEE cn it D N (+ o•0 00 FG n can D J U, 13.0' I; I < O O O O E E E f f E 0 •I cylI I .° tO.OL C71 •nn m CO (n I [7 ri D D D m � o E f II I N - � o O U)', I � - Z m f rf�. f E 0 z o }ON I I cn o g'b 0 4 6' I z � o cn 110.6% cn Ul °° } I cn{ I I -I m C r N v, Ul o I z ,1 cn ° O I = -< -U cn N cn o 0 3.2% f 0 J I I r N N r 0 � � 0'02 l O. M Cn Q O CTI J Cn (� �I �� I CO cn �`10 8.0' can cn cn c1 cn 2 I < cCn I -Cr,), cn , TI C rn 0O m z z. �� o \01 ;.° � � I � � I I D m on c �, . I z� PO � 0 1 0' 100 11`- cn �I y cn D Q< m Q cs N : �n J \ I �c 6.9 I p0 M < m J No c� \I LnL � \ � � cn o + � I I mZ 0 m O �' �cP �,, 0 D 0'0� 01 J iv Q,c�n N o 0) / 0000 \ o � . Fri r D z j S - � c�n Lyl cn cn � • \I 4M I � � o �� 30.0' I D �7 D Z � r m J Cno o m cn coo �; ` � � ro 2.0% m U Z m O D ��\ (A � � 0 o rn rn J Jr- o �-� r z p � ( I-I O 0 ;0 < z 00 CAI N O I C7 � mzmO mp m z rn: 0 � ' 0 0 0.0 C119) NJ cn cn J � J \ W o J0�° 1 � � f i o M D v IJ D Z Cn D N oq ON �... � � 0 10 0rn cn < ro � 0 6 % 01 f- � . vIo r� �' E cn G7 m Cn D 2 0€ r cp ,�U, `� � ao co / 0 0 \ 00 1-4 I fEb E = G D C7 C7 C °q 4.60 �S FS 1 cr 0 S `° \ '�S ,� `� 01 E f fN f r r mD _ � r I 2.1% z E I r M ° 0 . Z m 2 m m N FS �/ °°� Cn 0 �I o cn cn cn ono 0 92 f f f f Nf Eff I y 3 z 0 D Z D D C� Oz �� 01 C- 5• % ��C N (n °. Cb CAI o Cn C O E E E f �'� F I fOTI C _ �I Z I Cn E E L M M z 0 Z � /D� /V D !/ .5% W 00 0�0 00 L 00 00 (((\�//\��,'JJ N J •°� E f f E E E f f E f E E E M m 0 00 0 D < Z J � Iv\`�� E I fIEE f EE IF. Ef fl m O v m Ln p \ 0 7Q u' 4.86 0 � � \ S-0o05EfE fE EfE EffE O -n Ill p = - M cn A 0% F GB 5.3% f E E f f D Do 0 / � �� Q � O Y/ I r- LI/ Cn In D O \ 7Qs C� CJ1 O ...i�.' f� •', O I I \ CI E f E I f E E f E f E f f f EI f - Tm Ul G /V/� _ Z w o11\ z pe� 53.67 3 % `q Z " - Z D m y f W \. FL U, U, C� (� \ _ v' E I E f E f E f f E E II C� C� f f E f E E /1 In I W ..i� "L D J O� O C� f f f f f f E f f O C� D D _ Y� �(� m 1 0 r T z J O O = O f f f f f f fEf E I I I O O 1 r Z C m C Z (�A ° V N < f f f E f f f E E E f E f E E C� M m m ^^DZ V J O MU�1 r-C7 fE f Ef E Ef E f Ef EE fE E EE Ef ff D- E E E f E f Ef E E f f f I Om �N II r i -1 / \ M U.n � I -ffff ffff ff ff Pff f�fEf Ef E I �I PROP SED 3:1 SLOPE cn Vcn' po 243 ��\ �/� 56.58 TI JI m -i m -n '� O �• / F s� �- -- / FG cn cnyy - o - E < D / cn cn z (/�� m o o \\ O o I cn c°'J1m oc"o R38.0' 0 0 0 fTl m z G� o / -9 O c0 N < D O bo �� Cam- +: `� - � Cn G7 / c�U1 0o S O zoo o - r- 0= L 90 \ // rn 6.00 M 2 0 0 0 m D 0 - r C�2 .. D ✓ Cn 00 of 0.00 O C Q 1.0 O � Dm cyl� J{ N r 2 I ° � J \ DD Ic,� 50.50 z -1 cn N ro Oo o N C 1Z- cn � =6.CS� � O Cn z - FG < z o o m o z o O _ _ < v1 \ 0 -Z T 50.50 O OAS 43SOd0�d __ - 57.74 TIC 300, I cn Z D Z C 1 i Cn _FG � � -3d_ _ - � � � 57.24 FL cn01 =01011 °\P � o Q rn Z O Q - II _ _ il_ � ' vv vvv o o z z o o TI `� 9 I o _dl�ll_ _- - _ bo �� J r Can cn _ )? �' C0fll m C � � ;a �� i - %L'S .. 9 � -1 , CS N O � CTI � y O m0 m , � 4.66 0 r 9 O _ I I O L)l Z f 01 Fn <Tl _ '� m -1, O0 � o I 69 04 3.44 gg 1 _ � ��� I � � -90 / 55. 2 J c) rC I OJ C z cn o i _ I N �I I I rn D O ZJ ZJ = Q° O ! N U, 1� S �53 �, - I�\I rn �/�cf) \ I o o w cn HP/ 39 %SI�W010 2% IN. I r Z r O ZJ �, �,P o, 0 z • o OSED 2:1 SLOP D - < v 151.8 TG - - - - 0 r S -< Q A C II / eo S=0.005 N I _ D ZJ ZJ O rnrn ! 2.11 60.66 T,N f � � G 1 O 2C r - -xTi 1 / o z . 2 Q D :\ .\. / / �.c� / 0 85b l N � s• - 00 _ - 810 -I Z O n n Cn / oo rn Un oo, cn I =1 U) Z r z 4 U r1icn N \ c� , / �) J �" °Iv -oY f rn cn rn O G 0 ��52.2 �- rev QS w I o / / J N / rely cn rn C Cl) � � �s FS I \ \ � z � / �' w - Ts f 55. 8 <'1 0 z I I D m m m m �� < _ / / Ui �4g6 °� t 57.12 cs'0 F I 2.0 Gn D D Gn cn Q I N \\ / / °� /� v, c> cn o L5 / FS Cn cn n I l O o N cn l 0 l 0 I 1 f D Z r� 1 I �'' cn \ r u1 \ b1 o p c 1l 0 N �o cn O Z < z 52.6 �q c`'�0 \ r 1 L 393� 0 010 o'\ O r II I O D C 1 � � FG ° N z � 5 .60� . \ Z - D °2 o I o I o rn - - - - - - - - - - < � II T f 0 I 1 N �0 N Cn Cn I01 I o D N r� N - O �� - - - - - - - - 520.0 D NCn I N z NI o 01 55.8 (J1 C3l N = � 011 0 � N D 1�1� z � r � ° z 54.00 TF O7 o v � I •• _I � � . I I \ N TI O cno m �I� I 56G < 0 N � W N < =6.0 o J cnON fll z � D-I Ci � � D I= 04 A 5.00 0 II o I zy m 0 , I N-I FL Cn s � I N N � IQ cn mom " I � Ln Cn � � . NI GAO cn cn o N � oIV z � � I } U rc�0011'1 � rn cno 11.6'� r ? I oI 0 CD rnv o4 oO �o ��I I� � v�iU�, wc�n 0 0 cn � N I o U) J N m z 0 o TI II z I Cn I cn M m 15.4 f=CTI cn I < o N 9.5' 0 rT1 O 1 0 r- 0 I � N v C ool r CTI DTI I = � rn 0 mu MI- ! o •I I I:14.4' �� o m oo _ t2O' I M O I III-III O I I ,� o cn cn �_ D /� x > ml Ilillllllllll00 -171 U) o =1 I I-I I I�I N U� o 0 90 CD 0 0 0 In /� C3� W � I =I cn78' > II - T' 0 `� Z =III �II�II• o - D r � mx Al ^ I cn � 7o.0' D my o ■ I J I z = - = n 1 c nP cn Cn I I 1 0 rn Ln o M I OI I I-III-I I I I I�I I- O o D m z I I rGP W � N I o 0 0 o Q r s I m e ��I I-III-I I-III-III U �c� JC) 0 0 1s o ! I �1I s� -n I DI I I-III-I I II 11= - _ _ i 1=0�I I-I 11� =1 11=1 I o } T !'il I I-III-III-III=III= � �;� W = � I 'w 9 � �NI U,I 1 � s I 0 I •� � � • "o I I S 1 111EA I� I-III=1 I I=III-I \ I 2c O S c l -I I I�11 I I=III-III-III-I. �, �' z E I: E 70.0' !° I Ul 9 i 2 W ,� Cn o, O -I 11-111=11 I III-III-III o \ ,, N �I I 3• 1 J 5, tiL 14 N J N /r rn I I -111=1 11=1 11=1 I I�I I= I I I=1 I I O - \ m r f f U) • - i TI 5 / II-III=III=III=III=III=rt-111 0 z 1 \ f E E I ® 6 W I D z rn i-III-III-III-111-111-I 11 I� \�' 1 � E f E � � O �� I Cn 1 0i 20. -III-III-III-III-III-III= �� _ f' f E E f f E f c�I I o 0 I 00 I n 111=111=111=111=111=111=1 1 a0 I ,cmo E \ f E f E 0 cn o = o q 1-1 11-1 11-1 I I-I I I-I I I-I I I- f f 52.84 - oq _� N -111-111-111-III-III-III-I- '' O 1 1 �f-f f I- �' o I l =1 I I-III-III-III-111-III-111- - \ E \E f E FS 85 6' I 70 0' � ��" S c„ c„ r ' - =1 I I-I 11=1 11=1 11=1 11=1 I I-I 11= i 10 0 � 1 r- f E � ��o - l, D � 7 E E 3F.� E E E N +' 20.0' I I-III \per f 2 N O _ -111 I I ADOff f\ f.f)�f,E f Elf 2.0' I \5 90 I D c�cn 1 f ,X E ' I 1 'z 111-111 I / m m E f f \ E*f i-n 14 2- - J �� F c,a < -111 / D f f � f 0 I I � Cn S� I III-III r m / II E f L(g f f 1 Cn ! _ -111 C11 r1 E E f E E f -I \ \ 456 N '� (n Cn � E � m 0 I O 111=111 1 ^^ cn / E E ' f I c�' I f Q, /�1 ,^,cn cn E f -0 -111 0 1 U/m C E E E E f EJf W CfI �F( f E E� E O� v,UJI O N � E f f E E f E E f f f � A f f Er� f • v f I O C� r� f f f f E E j Cj I Un E f f E f f f m ��S l IIIII ,,, / E f Ej E ROPOSED 24'X24' f f 1 E YY^E1 EJ/E Cn E E f E E f f Y i\E f f Q f.y f E f / f C� f E f E 0 cn (� w �^ �,E f EI QUESTRIAN CORRAL I O E E CTIf E f Gf_._ E.f.f �f f.E f f E f E f f IE f E O Tl (�1 f� E f f f E E fD E�f E f f f f�f E E© N (JI O"�CY) /�l cyl I O N �1451 rn f E �f E� f f - TI V1 E f E r f E E V I O v' ^UPI U1 .�E E E f f f f EU.A f E E f.-�, �( E f T� E f f E f - -111 I 1 V/ IIE E E E Q (� f EE Cif r� (� E If f III=11 m I E fZ f 4 C r o I ,� 53.0 E N E ©E J E�f..� U!1! CA UJ9 f E E f E E J Cnl E IIIJJJ\Ol lilE fC f p m b E f v' I f E V =III- I 1 f E E 2% MIN. �51.5 0 0 51. V ,f f Pf o f f LU Elf f � © f /E N 7 �f E LJ f f E d� E E E 0 1\) Ell, • f f f f f E f E E E I1 1 Ef-�.f E E .. .. ... ... E f E E .. f f f E f f f E E f f E E E - C�E f E f f E f E Q I f E f E E j / II f� J FG _ II E 1111111i I 1 N 11` C� \ AL 1 f E f E f f �f ffT E f f f Dcn I111I1111 2.0 2:0' 90 cn cn _I 1 \ O r \ J \ E11111111 I \ z - T =111=11 \_ - �I=111 ... ... ... �... .. ... II . (n _ 11 11111111 I 0O 1 Cn � r I I�, / R S00°09 08 W, 331 .3 f � 4� �o -I I I- � 01 Z I I I rn No Cn m x o No O o 0 I•Tl m rm X �� 11 a1 0 6 1 III-II I / � - � � ti n0 -0 o - my J 0owr O c� I o 41 � I cn �nz 1T1 cn �crI c cA z o v - o o _ -III- N :_ - - o � � j Cr O � z III-II o : z l I+ .-�+-x-----4-o' 0 0 o M 1 z D - z D O I CO i � m co 0o I I - � -� I m0 r � oz � = I I1=1I o m I `s -I 11= ao o v o I {"- / I ^_T' � 0 D D < cn 0 o� I �, cn 0 = III-I m m rTl I v I I fTl r M M 3 D =111- oo � o o I I �1 r ��' Km �7�S� mo �c ��Z zo � � < p IIIIII11 0O A I I II Gl Dz ✓ Om - L Z 0 � cn Dn c < _ =111= y .mom I I 9.0' I � n -0 �� OKo z r z P Z p 11111111 < :(� cn �� o m U rr' cn Sl j z m I L -0 rT1 M N III-II � . Dm I I �I I\ � Q� � x = o SO � ^' �\ � � � s ✓ / o � � � CO n -III- n o I I 1 D T�o1 D U' D �� ✓ S / �� T, g< o IIIIIIII m -y I I I z I I m0 � z DW z �� ��Z ✓�.�, = D I (� C� cc D I I- IIIIIIII I I m i I c c r`' 0 �� m (J) ✓ �� S 6� 11-1I M . I h' -III- O1- - Il I I o W M o 0: (7 A III-I I I `m m \ �.� S ✓ L I IIIIIIII k i I I I O� z�- - - - IJ I I I I I11 o \ 1 i z 0 M < # M 1_ Mo mD IIII1111I ! no \\ o I 1� � � � �' III-I I ,. < - I 90 00 IIIIIIII I' = Z \ � , I � C �� ✓ � --- ------ ----�-- - x -- =111= cDi� ro p cD -\..��F 1V K: FCC � ...�........... ....... ...�...� ... ....... ... .. �S� L IIIIIIIIIMI I` z0 \ 1111111 l II1111I 111111I �1 � N Woo D � TI C -0 � CoK - 70M OMD =I-II � � ... . Oo cn � � � � Z D C D � r ip -III- cnl + I z : 0 D p - Z O z o m zrrl 1 O O N O OJ � O m I-II_ cn z z � Z m -111-I 1 ri 1 i=1 11=1 I I-1 i m ii rn O = D �7 z w N z Cn =1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I_ - - - - - x_ ��1 o r� z r� z r� G� m I O rTl I Oo_ c/) 11=1I 1=1I 1=II I-III 1=1 I =1 ( D D C z O M oo ' I•Tl D -1 11-1 11=1 11-1 I I�I I. I F cn 7�- r c� 0) -0 D Z O Z G� O O 1=1 11= i 1-1, =1 70 � I I f=1 I( r M z D D D oo Z I Z C� J Z m z III-III I III- N D � o z I I(-�I(; -� o � Z cn Z � r mcnzc� p m c,� . . own n O �= I 0 r C O - - - - - D z rnrl O m M C � � M 1 (/) r = - z n I ,- I m M (Al O - r C 70 � �C � O m � r,i l ' � I Igi I I-1 U) -4 D O Z C O C N O I 11-1�' D D m TI TI o cn O m r x-o O-1 11=1 M m �, o- -I I-I I-I 1= D M o n C� m C) TI C) r TI U) - r O �7 �7 C G-) z � N 2 N 11=1 I I-I D o m I I 1=11-11 Mil r-n n M D m ' o D_ O D C� CA N = D m I f=1 I(-III-I 1= C m = cn - m D O ;U M -III-I m z - O z = I I n m 11=1 11-I z o _ = 0 z �7 Z = �I=1 (�(=1 III=1 I I-I I ,-1-, r1� - � m � Z � � � (� �_ r � c� D Z=1 moll I I-I 0 1=1 I(_ -f 11=1 1= D cn < rn �D � O O C FT-I D FT-I cn M M z O M I�I VT 11= I - m ,1=1 11=1 11=1 - 1=1 11=1 I cn � D o z Coo = - 1I I1=1 - - - - - - - - m =1 1=1 1=1 11=1 I I I 1=1 I- N r,1 C z 1�1 r r D n O Z D 1=1 1=1 1=1 1= =1 1=1 p D � n z � Z z z M z n rn C7 G-) C7 11�I M I- III-III-III-III III-III- - rn z cn z .. M CD o � z M = D D m 0-111=111=111-I 1=111=1 11=1 I I z o O m - O M C7 CD � < I I = o I-III-III-I I1=1I ICI I1=1117 - Z M C Z � � � = m Cp CD O - co m TI ' Cn o = C7 r- M O O C O 11=111= o z m I II 11 11 11 11=1 Imo`- � M - O m M D �7 Z C Z Z J O O r-I I-I 1=1 1=1 1= p c�-I I I,I IIIII M 0 111� :. C r� D = Cn � O D fZ -n � C7 D 00 III D o o _ - cn v C� - M G� -III-1 I_ 1= I" G� Cn 0 - -< D �J � -11I cn 1I-I I1=1I1- C„ G) N o D OD = Z D C m C� o U! z =1 I I-I 11=1 I I- : . a� oo FF O D � - 11_1=111-I z �' i7 0 U) III-III I' Z m m cn M rT l K z z r� 7 1-111-11 _ D c � z D �1 m =11_1=111=111 C O < m m C7 II-111-111-I1 U1 D M - z -III-III-III I z 00 C� Z m - � II=111=111=1 cn I o o = O D z III-11�-11� O II=111=111=1 z Z III-III-III I. N < z O M � n II-III-III-II 2.0 2.01 2.3' (A M D -u F- n o D - M m O -III-III-III O r N O o m D 11=1I 1=1I 1=1I I M O CA � m co -i � p M � 90 0 -III-III-III O m O O I 11=1I 1=1I 1=1I C D �1 m o Z p - -III-III-III - U' D C z =1 I-III-III-I 1=1 1=1 1=1 I Z = oz - rc i M M � < r- (� G) < _ -III-III-III-II r n � o �J M 0 1=1I1=1I1=III M - � � -111-111-111=1I z � O C � � m = r� 1=1 1=1 1=1 I o o D Z z c� III-III-III 2 D III-III-I11= O is ` O � 0 = - _ -n r !-III-III= -II D fTl 0 O ' M IF- -III-III- -III I < Z 1=1 I I-I I I I I-I I-III J Z () i111m o�llllll11 1 ", � N o D C D r A r o m �_�K K II 111 I I111 i ...F O oo I+ m F-111=11 - - - - 0o z-111=111-T III=13 - � O 1=III-III III=III-III- - - - - - - - - - - D z 1I11=1 I I= 1=111-111-111 Z m l l=Ti-Ti-I I-I I(=Ti C rn za 11=111=1 III-III- N r o = O�I II IIIII II II II I� O Z m � m -1 I, I-�I II II II I1 oo = � z ,,qq � I ro = o � 0 I zcno O mo > � o 0 r r r rn N no m M D o = x � = D co PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: m z m m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 ayS REG/S,F . 00 � C oy x z �F W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc NJ W o EAST END OF ARAPAH O ROAD o N RANCHO C U CAM O N GA, CA 91739 o N Civil Engineering t, Subdivision Land Planning 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 M = W W D N o N N �` TEL: (909) 608-7118 t, FAX: (909) 946-1137 0 ::E Cn '2 DRAWING NAME: ��� PRELIMINARY WQMP & SITE DRAINAGE PLAN \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613Cg07-cf.dwg, 9/21/2020 2:51:25 PM, Adobe PDF 0-) 0') C.,•l W I I c � E3 3 D 00 0 CD M (D C/) 0 0 3 3 rn rn Q \ BUILDING co n Q = � r- 0 0 c (D so x Cn �lCj o i cyl 0 �- O Cn Cn I P C' o c r+ � -4 r CP 30.0 3 (p ODD z L� o0 cs` p M 14 Cs � 00 Z gt' �� IN D D Xv1 � G7 �r 16, 6' L M X MI z Cn �� �� �� oZc o � jo M z CD M)0, � �� �L �� o J O v -jO N N `< n /�000' y O� � � o � � Zc O Aj WN rCrD rc,cn srn �6r,J oZ� J o zCn ,� D00 C0 � J rn Z J s m 0 c D Zc J�6 Co ILI) '� 6 X r 12.0' 18.0, 16 Z� o -n 0 �� ��,4 S6 O II NOD r-0 60.20 T � Cn 'ter, 65.30 TW >n = o, 67.60 TW o 00 54.20 TF ` y N 0 7.30 TF r m o �" °D rn 59.60 F - o \\, =6.0' �� c°'o J H 1 .0' 57.55 TG o _ N o H 1=8.0 Z� �s N ° 10 3 331 7 = 05 I O o e=2 0 m X �J / f f Z�/ CZ rnrn rnrn 0_ __ ��V' f E f f`E E /E{,f E f E EJq./E •1 3.3' 8 ° • • • 14 f0/0/ Cn f E Lf E F L E �I �i • L /\ Il 11 i Cn O N = Cn I (�E E� E« E E « E E E M FL P F O cn rn O rn cn O (n u' O -2% M 58.50 N 1 7 0 00 \TJ , E z • � � � N fTl p 00 �• tf ���f f f E O 2lJ +• �' (n k•W m I X W OGl rQ 0 Cn � � � � � zo EV o f E o OD TI � �l � Z^ fm L o N 0 O ry r n (� r (� , V' - �9% 8.30 8 O ' o O 20.0' c9� C E E �� « E U Cn < % S F z7- E E Elf �``f E I M +' _' I z 1. ° I �n, o >`y V J f f f E T E E f W W I �/ ..cc11 ` • CIS V.y-'. CU Oy I �/ O �l _ Cn Cn L C� -4 GJ LA J 3 3.5% Z I � •� + -Tion 0 00 + O V 0 < c� Z0 t� E E f EE E E o, O 00 rn II _ �,1,A� Cfl 5 .1 59,V8 0� co C1J CA O f E f E O Cn Cn W - II L J J J r 0 FS FS > ( Z Cn rnrn^ Cn E 'I FOf E ESE +60 + +�`� �N I I ' ►I: N ' �� �' + +�,N +° +� +' �, oCn 2.0% I.\ TT P� �Cn m W(, f (rC f _ �T O Si7 �j Q T �^ Aso W E E o +'p \I o0 1 1 Ng i+ I +�, +\I 5 F +o 00 0� +C U� -Tl Z « E Cn C„ 3.0' r t E « Cn , o Cn < o ° E E E N NI .I N (n ,0 0� O U' N N , m -di o o G-' K C E` E E ,tn 00 +\I +rI 0o O + I �' + + + + + Iv ul CAI Cn 00 +. o +' `� I 4 z 00 _ - Q � D o r E 10 F`c90 CAI � CAI I CAI O O ZC "� � O O (/II Iv Iv N9 0 m _ foil G� Z O 0 r T' +• + 29 +' + + +' +' O N - Q_ CA \I o J � O O � _ J � � o ,. CA � O � � Z \I N Cn(n ,0 s so Z N N G� OD C N C�I Csl N r c� N N I -A N 0% C�Dll 0 MQ (_0 0 �'j %D 4 4�__ _M1 I - V 1, r� C.I Csl o N N N N cfl 6. � ifl w -TIccnn Cn �0'0� rn "cn U, o O N 2. CD C ZG' LTI c�J C� Csl C A N N N rn 0) � 00N N O N o O .0' C>m - U, o+' m+'�' o +N o o' +� +� + +' N 2.0 . + + _ o p o�j W N� O � v r0 �. ,. z CZ7 = m = C D sz�� �, c° OCDI Csl N N CA N N � 0 r� - oN Z m � M fT1 O . C/) + +• +. +• +• + + II ,/ Ln EEf° m 6- n p : D �� \I CD 0� N . c � �N N g ° in o ��r f � O � C D � C2 Zc � � .4 �''I � �', o, N�I00 � C�J � � � °' � o N N �sj o O J � E E E?� `� f E rF� Zc J D Z Z < �� J J + FS o C°so �° S �' Ciro +� 0 +C0 +N z O W 0 DCA 0 �N �� O CI7 W Cn � � N N o O �E E m o� �j D 0 � f Tl CJTI 0�0 ZG� cn + 5 J CA (n + (b C I +IN cb + � +N \I \I O z O O Cn �" I'nl, E^E E E O (� //� • Cn TI /�n / I Cn ��/�� /�� (� �(� {J.l�(��J V o `v T T F /T L.JV�1� +• • J L>l \l l \JV O +J ° \ • ^J /\l5 +' \� f'f « E fff•`i"�i « f f f E f f D O O Cn O z� N 53. 7 �I � � O J Ef ! f �tf EE fE tE fE D1 �, y II CN}• +• O ..L Y v O + �� \ O!E E E E E E E f E E -41 / `l\IVY^J ° ' G /� I--i-1 Z T z O0 = 0 EfE tE f E E E « EEtE f O (1�J Z M V T //� Z �.,, V /'� ( N < -p f f E E E Of f E - T O /�V V� � �� 1. < PL +• � � T +� +• +• E+ ff E'E EE «'f Ef Elf ff ��� m O N C� 0^=O��O`7'�� CX� ^ , •'Eft E E E E �E ,Ek E E E f �� V/I � r / "f'- O Iv (n IF 00 EE E t•'Vt ,E E E 0 O D D I� I' fl 3: SOP 6.58 Co ,, J' o + +o +J + + �+ 2 T D Z m O O F FIG Cn CnD y o cn v, M Z7 G� �cn oo cn � J m OO o - =? D Q 2 is �w U (n Z G' o o ( O O - 0 O Cn N / 0 0.00 TF o �� Q 5 0 1 n D 6 ' N� o I + + I�+o-) �I +�o + o +� I I U, =6.0 �� • M �� < O d o m _ Z O o �� J �c� 5�5o I :ZQ3s d N 24 T� N = �+� +� N ( � _ o' 111 c9 0 �I �I o J v U, �) TT Qo �o I�IIr, O O - o N oD O N N AN)°' C_A 00 1 00 FS o p o O O < O g crP - O N Csl Csl 00 C o .fig CO � N o O N J 2% MIN. 27 IN. Q N = Cn Q7� 0 ED�2:1P O oZ II a-) a� 2.1 1 66 N O J s Cn Cn 9 N oo Cfl 6, N N �$�p0.005� oo ` J (,gym ' F % o O o � oD N N ��-O zoo Ln z N c0 O O I O r O � I O � _ rn Cn O s, FS I ' N - s z _ -� +� +o N o+ I ° 55 O I o �,,, o z1 2.0' -==----% " o � O mCn O � (n � Ln � < z 52. �q N(n o C� w o N Crl o o �N F N -u' S - TI om o V ! + + O O O 'l N � � � c D �lN - N -O a7 - NCn 0 N r I cn �} Cn CD U' N Cn ° 5 .80 4.00 N ' NN +� + °' 5Cj 6. o +� - r =61.a 41 M ' ® - G °D o rn O I < o Dom �' zQ �4 O N z � +N +� +� ° o IN CD c� �r.' N rmCn � � rn c� , � N Cn Z Cn (P �1 O 15.4 Csl Cn O \I = < Cn N Csl O�O Csl f� \I , Cl.I C�I N N � 0 eD 0 O O N N N m D �I J o, 0 N Cfl N Csl \I O C A N -P 4 Lf)o 02 N N © � 1 � o Csl C�I N N O Orn O O N N NON \I z o +� +� +' '� +' 5• ' +o l ' I \o l '�, I ' I -n I I ' ' ,, �I �I - 1 ❑ 00 9.8 Cn - r Cn CGaI Cn (_0 N C iv ? m < o 0 0 0 2 .0' c�m �O �C" Cn� - m N N = N N N O O � ��-, < Do ro�zx +. +. + .� + +. II + +' +' 170.0' z � =m� I O Cfl CSD Cn it C�J r, LO O O 0 Csl _00 �0 = �s r� c� 0 0 d D z ?� W �� �, N C 600 cs TI cn cn o;O �< �o -P 0 w � � Qom � � �� � � r � O `� ;� � N N N N \ �' DU)O o o +. +• o. +� +' 0 I I I I ' I ' I ' SIN I r�MJ> CO Z ° Csl < � S N Csl w Arno � X o � z f E 70.0� O O O O 9 N �' N iv N N CCnn CU) �mr f E N + + + +• 1 .5' I I I I I I� CA M � �ITI f E E E f E N J \1 O Cn rn 00 NCn C1J U� CJ� 20. m E W G� 0 f E ` E ' « «E . +52.8 +' + J' o o N - Mn -+ + 0 v I ' I I Imo' I I Imo' Imo' I Imo' Imo' Imo' l D E E ^ . / I / I� • C E f f E E Cn S � `.i 0 • O Crl �1�1 �N T C7 (] f E E t E f E E E J 85.6 � 04 �/ 70.0, TI O r N s� U1 Cn O ' o� O O � E E E �E E E O O O O O Co.0 O T Or I I rn �O N N N (v ° 20. �o ITI zD0 .T' E E I DO � . E Ef f ' E Ef V 00 `D � �O' 5 .9� 0•r 1 f f f 0� J f f G� Cn � « E (n rn _ O O O C4 O (vm mNCn E � E �,fE+f' `f" +J + + " �, s� ' I E l op �' �' ' CV E E E E E E G7 CI.I - E E E CJJ G7 N TI E E E E E f E E f (II C C � G E E f E E O O J Cn �E to E E f� E f E �yn 0 G7 E E E f f E f E E E iCJ O �Q m C0 � E E E j CD Cn E ESE E f o E f F f z m f « �' I •I • • E f •t _^ •E f f• O m � f t OP9SE �4X 4 + +' I � � I I I f S f fOV r �F 1 '�, f E E f M I ,IT f E 1 E E E f E f• f D O Cn0) , I v 00 f E (spy `�1EWf O O ul E E l ((.) 00 77 QUESTRIAN CORRAL O J E ,lJ/o f E f E f E E E •E� Cn E E E f f f E f' N m Z Cn /� E E �F TI t E E f E ED S E f� f E © V 0 Q X OTI J(}'y-',I O �]I U' I(� v� f f E E I f E fI t E f E 'f,f 0 �'�J f t E�� O) E' f � E� +•' I +•' I +•' f ' I ' 0 W I • J3• TV`'• ,�`E{ f IE EIE ' f E • I 0 E E f 'E E �N ' (fl 51.7 •I� •E � E E f E I f � f� f E t f E E f �E�f E • � � � C7 E E E % M I N 51.5 E O O E f Pf f t QE1 W f E E �E E f L� E♦ f C«7`E f E E f E E Ef fl IfE E• E � I • 0 N = Cn 1 E E II E « 0 cn CD o C� D � Coo ° � \ •�I' Ti s, S00°09 08 W, 331 .3oMw o _ o _ �Cn ;UM �ti Ory �rn�� m CIJ �7M � o�o II � I Zm _ _ O o r*1 D O O N rrl X C O _ 41 O cn(n zrmTl � � ;;uCn O� � �� O � Oz � .Z�] O _UN G70 0 00E�n m II o 000 =0 0Z D � nZm �`so ZC -� �Cm - � 0z � cz�N o cn O o M ;J D o K o w O m G) (n _q � D D D < J �G)cn 7i �m .Z�l� Dp � � n m id >Mo C ��Z L1� � Zo � � n > �6,�_M 2 � m �, DCn ✓i O � � � _ � o�o� m ���� 0 II 9.0 �� Ll; cmo L�Z o _min Dz < : N Ln C) IUD M M D � rn � N 10 D C� �s J < � o zF ✓ � � �7 P m ✓ ss Mp N C � I a L D \ gym \ iZ �CO i00z � , , ✓ �I GJ �' L Q MM I � � co �T mo M � �i s No L_ Cn z m �o a, G) oZ o o Na L D Ln _ D Z 1 - ii m m ASPHALT �` o D r m C CD C D co C�7 N 0 o = x � = D N PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: mMI MI O m m m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 a�S REG/S�Ff' . C oy 0 z �F�FO� W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc W o w EAST END O F ARAPAH O ROAD ,, 0 0 N N RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 = o� ^Z o Civil Engineering a Subdivision ° Land Planning � � 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 m w 0 N`" c�` ^� TEL: (909) 608-7118 ° FAX: (909) 946-1137 U)MI Q DRAWING NAME: co CUT/FILL MAP \\wwserver\D\2016\1613-Trump Development Rancho Cucamonga Arapho 5 lots\CG\1613CG08-wall.dwg, 9/21/2020 3:14:25 PM, Adobe PDF I II I D II I I I I I I L L � � II � I ,v1 r � L I L � II 0 r II � � 1 o J I ✓ n LI I ( L o I II �co� 0�'4� z L ,1\1) � � � L\: P �� III II �O ��� m m U� I I D I I � \C1 �, �N °� S�, II II ao I (Z9b �� l�. cs Lam, L\3 D L) c;,, LZ I m o 1 z cr I II I III �� "'mac 01 z CS 22 cn 0 II III '��` S 2c 0 D — �C m -U z cn D o J Aso �Sn m S� J S�9� II J z—1 o �c c�N II II n- m �� s S o� I o � aog' T c mc� 2c �0 Dm 2C I 1 7Q6 C � x J II JrCn J x X. — X — x— . I �J � � — . off . . 0 6J - - - - - - - - - - - -- — = Novo - - - - T D Joy oo 60.20 I c�, . I 65.30 TW 67.50 TW o o o r m 54.20 TF �w �J I 57.30 TF r-m 59.50 TF -� 0°10'43" 331 .37' H=8.0' H=8.0' mc, '^,� E ff EE f EE f ff E EE ff fE fE 1 3.3' % • 148.0 2 RETAINING D� _� E E E E E E 1 4.3 I cr'•'n z II E EE E f � E fEf \1 N o 00 E f E E I E E I I t' (�{ f E f f E E E f E \ � D N Z7 O Cn Cn E V E EEE E f EIEfE E f I I L I I z o _o o E f E f IE f I I 20.0' _� •� W E 1II E � E E E f f E E E f I I •� "p�� D �� E E E I E f O J I - (� _ �J C7 QV E E�� � //// f E f E E E Z�j �O/i I 14 O , f E E f E E E E f f E J J L � � I rnoo I z O E E f E E E E� f I CP f E f /�^` f 1 �e ZI E E VJ E E V Q E �7 f f J Q E E z� >o J E E I L I p mz �N I I I 1 z I _ Jso O — I L �I ��' I c � O n' \\II rn �P w \\ S I I -U I J m M I � 0 o `sue N O u)00 1— U) Z V,E ffss E E m C) D 70 1. � C J G �S� I ` �lSa, O �S� EEE E�EfY�f E f �/f• I �� � " �� C V�j� E E �f- E I r M lY� • � J I � E E E f f E I L E I f E E f E E E E IE N CJ1 ^ \ f EE{I E f ' E E E E E E E E E E E E f TEEE f IE f E E E E f f E E E f I - W TT \ E E If E E E f f f EI - C Cn E E f i f f E E E f f ,�.�I 1 •. \ II E E E f E f f E E E E E f E f f E E E EI o `7 �I /` •V .sL. C1 O f E f E E E E f� + E f E 1 0 0 O �� f E E E E f f E E E E f O' ry�1 �� D<� E E f E f E E E E f E E f E E f f E E - /1 T f E E E /f� D ` � J l/M o N I f E f f f E f f f •+I f •S - Q N 1 \ E�Cn C fE E Ef E EE E Ef E EEE Er II O E - �� • tIII III / I n N m \ f E E E E f E E f E E E E f O yy r 2 r �� 00 0m-U \ — I mz o cP 7 f 0� ;U CM) � I • � L— / S �Xo z � � o ;;U \ 6.00 TW r''p Doo = = I =z D �zm �o / / / /o o C I cn N ZC =6.0 02 L L r\hJl N 000 z - _ m 00 Na c � I 000 \ - � n �I I � m r �? II oacno O � � • 000 � � � � J1 > / �S `g � �� 2c I � � L c z o � < C \\ \ O I I I c°'n J �./ Cn cn �� �Z \ O - - - — — — - - — - - - - I I oo I � L `� L > zo I \ — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - o I I c �? ✓ Li � � Uo, mW _dw�I I oo I -I CP. J EF >C) O O fD I `' z �' So M ; z oI o L — �� o I r I 0 ) L �? p o ✓ L �c I I n O I I o �� I 0 I I 1 n 0� m � o L p I 0 /� I oU r U) �o �o22 M 00 Do O I IF1 9) ® _I D C� i �'� L" Cn -r, > r If M < M Z L 00 m , co � �m N I0 -1 N nm X 0 cr o o I m N Dm � � ro =zN I i IIo J I I z� m0 � < XD �� \ I $ m I I boo �s r �s , S9 I I _ 1�10 z0 m1711 D�O6 \ ry 9 I ' I 9 O 0 O I I r� r-p7i1 W z\� EII;13E11 �� \ Z \ E I E E E I C) f D I (� m E E\E f f E E E E E _ I I E I E f E E\f EE�Et f E E (� I ❑ I I � I o�� rT� z D 0 f E E E E E f E E f EIE E O/ o " I pz-uD o I E f E f E\EE f E E fE Ef E v X I I O �o 0 U) E II �n A D �o m m f E E E E f\ f E E E f O I I O o Cr Cn Cn -U m / D m E E E f E f E� ( f f E pCAI _U 7 E f o I I C41m O o o O o .0 -0 o CC) U1 r D / f E f E f f I1 E E rT� -I rT� f E mLf)C� 0 \ 00 1 m G / f f A. E f J f f E C� � E E E E -E E E E CO. E f f E E f E f E E f E E E I I C G_ / f t E fr f T E f f E E f E 0 E E E \ f > r U) N S Cn(� n r E f f E E E (n T� 0) .O' E� E E E E Zll N O f E f f E E f f f�E f f f Ip II O E ^��E E f f f E f D m 00 �S I d — z rr7 f E f f E f , f o� = U�U� 1 1 � f E �E E `(l^E f f f I ROPOSED 24 X24 �(� r II o f E f f f E f f 0) E f E E f E \ m C� f fief E f f S Cn O CC TI E E "P E E f E E E E E .P�(�E E T 6F1 CA E f k E E E E I E E O-0 I Q� QUESTRIAN CORRAL o O O 0 G D f f E E f E f E fIE f E E �/�f E f I E O E E E f E E I f � E; f f E f E \V - _< u f E f E 57 00 f > > o z 'r �'E/ E E f E E E f f f I E f E f ESE E E 1 f f��y Of f E E E f E E ©N OO ITl CS\ 1 N E 1 �� r 0 m 60.0 TFYrf fl�( EE E E fE f E �l EE f Ili Ef TI E fr- E �E (� V EE f fE - _ O 1 I rTl I E EvPE EEE4�9.0 E/y� J C rm Z J 52.0 '9rff `E !/VJf EEE f fEE EE fE f� EElr l'IEEf �I O EEFEI•IE EfE �fm f��'',,1{{{ fE EfEf �fEE E �� m I m 1 1 Gf� -_�ofiy/`!" I V/ H_O. f f,.E E E E E E E E E E E f EI E E f E E E f E lT O ^v E f f E E E E Er-E�E m�/ 9l1`fLe AI I N G I 2' C7R I I E I NGf E E E E E E E E f E f E E I'E f E E f f E E f E E f `O'�E E lO'o f E E E E E E I f f E E E L L_ I T1 1 N = Cn 1 > f E E E E fEE-E�f JE E D V T 1 M Cp Cn Cn 1 G� \ Doo�o 41 I= N m 1�s� S00°09'08"W, 331 .38' �s oo rn = D °'Z C CHAIN LINK ffiENCE +6' �I �� `�' I I °' Cn Cn / -pN �cn ��'G 00 � cP02 m -a omX o� oo Gomm ------ � -x----- °i - rr o 0 o I y - z D 0 I �2 D O z > . 600 Z m x---------x-ILI ---x-- x------. Cn I I c�z r c� z S C o m c�z NCj \ of , oo/ / Dm0 _� �o I J �o �o � oc� 0cn C w I I < �1 `n L r'' — 0 m> Sl �m0 ��C � Do Ir D ��m 1 I I II I = Mm �,��� J � Z � o =z =� 30M o m Mm I I I� I �m ✓ cmo L�Z 0 �c"- Nn � ,� �� �H — 0 LM _ �/� 00 \ I I I1:2 I\\ D D� �O D SOJ� (� ✓� � � GCS Q ��_ / � i< �O I I I z i m M, C) z �� L�Z ✓�.-I _ I L c�' °mo D I I + I I r< Pr�' N� v ��� z < �-� s� > L 90 00 �� Lim C�? I 0 CFnv J�4K =cam v `� � \� � II �\ ASPHALT I o � I� L 41 0 o I I � l0 o\ D I of r o <D o - 1 C) c./) - 1 m r c7 0 i J O 3 -n =_ �Z " m n - 1 Z7 M — (n Tl S CD � n m C4 � < ;) I7 M XzDMOO Z7Z ZD — T10 C 0 CEO m D wmmm � � -0 cno = 00� M � v -0 1CC) I D M z z �� � O00 = = M � ��0 - � � � O m �l O D O O Z m ---I Z G7 C 03 m C r < O_ -9 Z �l r 0 � cn cn m O c) r -U Mo z G� o � r 0 0Dz MC) o O O D M A D T1 m 0 � CD �) D O -9 T1 0 —j -1 D �u �7 M m Cl) m rm � M Cl) -0 .Z7 Z r D m 7 z D 0 r �0 D _U �7 �7 M r M C z 0 G� ZD Cn M Z cz—/) z m fv F— r p z m -1 co D = � ,,-, J D M D rO * m r G 0 o m F�1 m D r\ fTl � D r � z cn � z z O r N roT1 r O O r 00 r m Z O O z z D cn o g D o z Z O C�7 F- z z 0 -0 N o m 0 o = = D N PROJECT: NO.: REVISION: DATE: m 1-111 O m m m 5 LOTS RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION - TR 20152 a�S REG/S�Ff' . oy Z �F�FO� W&W Land Design Consultants, Inc W o EAST END OF ARAPAH O ROAD ,, 0 0 � 0 N RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91739 = o ^Z o Civil Engineering ° Subdivision ° Land Planning � � 2335 W. FOOTHILL BLVD., SUITE 1, UPLAND, CA 91786 m W oP N c�` ^� TEL: (909) 608-7118 ° FAX: (909) 946-1137 CAI � � CD 8 DRAWING NAME: BLOCK WALL PLAN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD INITIAL STUDY & MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA 91739 RANCHO CUCAMONGA LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91130 REPORT PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 2211 SOUTH HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 FEBRUARY 27, 2021 RNCH oo i Exhibit C PACE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PAGE 2 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION PROJECT NAME: Five Single-Family Home Units PROJECT ADDRESS: Eastern Terminus of Arapaho Road,Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 APPLICANT: Leo Zhang,LRZT Inc.2738 Pepperdale Drive,Rowland Heights,CA 91748 CITY AND COUNTY: City of Rancho Cucamonga,San Bernardino County DESCRIPTION: The City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department,in its capacity as the Lead Agency,is reviewing a request by Leo Zhang of LRZT Inc. to construct five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The total gross land area would be 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres). According to the Tentative Tract Map No.20152,the vacant land would be divided into six(6)lots. Lot i would be 25,910 square feet. Lot 2 would be 27,523 square feet. Lot 3 would be 20,005 square feet. Lot 4 would be 27,729 square feet. Lot 5 would be 20,452 square feet. Additionally, there would also be a Lot"A"that would be 7,256 square feet. FINDINGS: The environmental analysis provided in the attached Initial Study indicates that the proposed project would not result in any significant unmitigable adverse environmental impacts. For this reason,the City of Rancho Cucamonga determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed project. The following findings may also be made based on the analysis contained in the attached Initial Study: • The proposed project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered,rare or threatened species or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. • The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. • The proposed project would not have environmental effects which would cause substantially adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly. The environmental analysis is provided in the attached Initial Study prepared for the proposed project. The proposed project is also described in greater detail in the attached Initial Study. PAGE 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PAGE 4 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.o Introduction.......................................................................................7 1.1 Purpose of the Initial Study.....................................................................................................7 1.2 Initial Study's Organization.....................................................................................................8 1.3. Initial Study Checklist..............................................................................................................8 2.0 Project Description .......................................................................... 17 2.1 Project Overview.....................................................................................................................17 2.2 Project Location......................................................................................................................17 2.3 Environmental Setting............................................................................................................21 2.4 Project Description .................................................................................................................21 3.o Environmental Analysis ...................................................................27 3.1 Aesthetics................................................................................................................................28 3.2 Agriculture&Forestry Resources.........................................................................................30 3.3 Air Quality..............................................................................................................................33 3.4 Biological Resources..............................................................................................................42 3.5 Cultural Resources.................................................................................................................48 3.6 Energy.....................................................................................................................................54 3.7 Geology&Soils.......................................................................................................................55 3.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions....................................................................................................61 3.9 Hazards&Hazardous Materials...........................................................................................64 3.10 Hydrology&Water Quality...................................................................................................69 3.11 Land Use&Planning.............................................................................................................75 3.12 Mineral Resources..................................................................................................................78 3.13 Noise.......................................................................................................................................79 3.14 Population&Housing............................................................................................................87 3.15 Public Services........................................................................................................................89 3.16 Recreation...............................................................................................................................95 3.17 Transportation .......................................................................................................................96 3.18 Tribal Cultural Resources......................................................................................................98 3.19 Utilities and Service Systems...............................................................................................103 3.20 Wildfires ............................................................................................................................... 107 3.21 Mandatory Findings of Significance....................................................................................112 4.0 Conclusions.....................................................................................113 4.1 Findings.................................................................................................................................113 4.2 Mitigation Monitoring..........................................................................................................113 5.o References ......................................................................................115 5.1 Preparers ...............................................................................................................................115 5.2 References .............................................................................................................................115 Appendices...............................................................................................117 Appendix A:Air Quality Worksheets.................................................................................................119 Appendix B: Utilities Worksheets......................................................................................................145 PAGE 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAFAHO ROAD LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1-1 Initial Study Checklist..............................................................................................................8 3-1 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions.............................................................................38 3-2 Estimated Operational Emissions in lbs/day.......................................................................39 3-3 Local Significance Thresholds Exceedance SRA 32..............................................................41 3-4 Estimated Annual Energy Consumption..............................................................................54 3-5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory..................................................................................63 3-6 Residential Noise Limits........................................................................................................83 3-7 Common Effects of Construction Vibration.........................................................................85 3-8 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment.........................................................86 3-9 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD)Fire Stations..................................91 3-10 SBCSD Police Stations in Ranch Cucamonga.......................................................................92 3-11 Trip Generation Estimates....................................................................................................97 3-12 Water Consumption(gals/day)...........................................................................................104 3-13 Wastewater(Effluent)Generation(gals/day)....................................................................105 3-14 Solid Waste Generation(lbs/day).......................................................................................106 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit Page 2-1 Regional Map.........................................................................................................................18 2-2 Citywide Map...........................................................................................................................19 2-3 Local Map...............................................................................................................................20 2-4 Aerial Map..............................................................................................................................22 2-5 Site Utilization Map...............................................................................................................23 2-6 Tentative Tract Map No.20152.............................................................................................24 3-1 Important Farmland in Rancho Cucamonga .......................................................................32 3-2 Sensitive Receptors Map........................................................................................................40 3-3 Wetlands Map........................................................................................................................47 3-4 Nearby Faults.........................................................................................................................57 3-5 Geotechnical Hazards............................................................................................................58 3-6 Flood Hazards Map................................................................................................................72 3-7 Zoning Map............................................................................................................................76 3-8 General Plan Map...................................................................................................................77 3-9 Typical Noise Sources and Loudness Scale..........................................................................81 3-10 Typical Construction Noise Levels........................................................................................82 3-11 Fire Hazard Severity Zones.................................................................................................109 PAGE 6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE INITIAL STUDY The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga(referred to hereinafter as "the City"). The total gross land area would be 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres). According to the Tentative Tract Map No. 20152,the vacant land would be divided into six(6)lots. Lot 1 would be 25,910 square feet. Lot 2 would be 27,523 square feet. Lot 3 will be 20,005 square feet. Lot 4 would be 27,729 square feet. Lot 5 would be 20,452 square feet.Additionally, there would also be a Lot "A"that will be 7,256 square feet., The proposed project applicant is Leo Zhang, LRZT Inc. 2738 Pepperdale Drive, Rowland Heights, CA 91748.As part of the proposed project's environmental review,the City of Rancho Cucamonga authorized the preparation of this Initial Study.2 Although this Initial Study was prepared with consultant support, the analysis, conclusions, and findings made as part of its preparation fully represent the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,in its capacity as the Lead Agency. The primary purpose of CEQA is to ensure that decision-makers and the public understand the environmental impacts of the proposed project and that decision-makers have considered such impacts before considering approval of the proposed project. Pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines,purposes of this Initial Study include the following: • To provide the City information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an environmental impact report(EIR),mitigated negative declaration,or negative declaration; • To facilitate the project's environmental assessment early in the design and development of the proposed project; • To eliminate unnecessary EIRs; • To determine the nature and extent of any impacts associated with the proposed project; and, • To enable modification of the proposed project to mitigate adverse impacts. The City also determined,as part of this Initial Study's preparation,that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental document for the proposed project's environmental review pursuant to CEQA. This Initial Study and the Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be forwarded to responsible agencies,trustee agencies,and the public for review and comment. A 3o-day public review period will be provided to allow these agencies and other interested parties to comment on the proposed project and the findings of this Initial Study.3 1 W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc.Site Utilization Map,5 Lots Residential Subdivision—TR 20152.Sheet No.1.May 29,2019. 2 California,State of. Title 14.California Code of Regulations.Chapter 3. Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. As Amended 1998(CEQA Guidelines). §15o5o. 3 California,State of. Title 14.California Code of Regulations.Chapter 3. Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act.As Amended 1998(CEQA Guidelines). §15o6o(b). SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 1.2 INITIAL STUDY'S ORGANIZATION The following annotated outline summarizes the contents of this Initial Study: • Section 1 Introduction provides the procedural context surrounding this Initial Study's preparation and insight into its composition. This section also includes a checklist that summarizes the findings of this Initial Study. • Section 2 Project Description provides an overview of the existing environment as it relates to the project site and describes the proposed project's physical and operational characteristics. • Section 3 Environmental Analysis includes an analysis of potential impacts associated with the proposed project's construction and the subsequent operation. • Section 4 Conclusions includes the findings of the environmental analysis and the Mandatory Findings of Significance. In addition, this section includes the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program(MMRP). • Section g References identifies the sources used in the preparation of this Initial Study. The Appendix is included in a separate volume and includes the air quality/greenhouse gas analysis,the biological assessment, the water quality management plan (WQMP), and utilities consumption and generation worksheets. 1.3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST The environmental analysis provided in Section 3 of this Initial Study indicates that the proposed project would not result in any unmitigable,significant impacts on the environment. For this reason,the City of Rancho Cucamonga determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed project. The findings of this Initial Study are summarized in Table 1-1. Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less thanLess than Description of Issue Significant I Signifipactcant Significant No Impact Impact Mitigation Impact SECTION 3.1 AESTHETICS. 3.i.A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a X scenic vista? 3.i.B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings,and historic X buildings within a State scenic highway? 3.1.C. In non-urbanized areas,would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings(public views are those that are X experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point)? If the project is in an urbanized area,would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table i-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.i.D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the X area? SECTION 3.2 AGRICULTURE&FORESTRY RESOURCES 3.2.A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance(Farmland),as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping X and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural uses? 3.2.B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for X agricultural uses,or a Williamson Act Contract? 3.2.C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for,or cause rezoning of,forest land(as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)),timberland(as defined by Public Resources X Code Section 4526),or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))? 3.2.D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or X conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? 3.2.E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which,due to their location or nature,could result in X conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use? SECTION 3.3 AIR QUALITY 3.3•A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation X of the applicable air quality plan? 3.3•B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment X under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? 3.3•C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial X pollutant concentrations? 3.3•D. Would the project result in other emissions(such as those leading to odors)adversely affecting a substantial number of X people? SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications,on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or X regional plans,policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table i-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.4•B• Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in X local or regional plans,policies,regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? 3.4•C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on State or Federally protected wetlands(including,but not limited to, X marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? 3.4•D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife X species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? 3.4•E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources,such as a tree X preservation policy or ordinance? 3.4•F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,Natural Community Conservation Plan, X or other approved local,regional,or State habitat conservation plan? SECTION 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.5A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of the X CEQA Guidelines? 3.5•B• Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of X the CEQA Guidelines? 3.5•C. Would the project disturb any human remains,including X those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? SECTION 3.6 ENERGY 3.6.A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,inefficient,or unnecessary X consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? 3.6.11. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local X plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? SECTION 3.7 GEOLOGY&SOILS 3.7.A. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault,as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map X issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault;strong seismic ground shaking;seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction;or landslides? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 10 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table i-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.7.B. Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the X loss of topsoil? 3.7.0 Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, X and potentially result in on-or off-site landslide,lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? 3.7.D. Would the project be located on expansive soil,as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(2012),creating X substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? 3.7.E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater X disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? 3.7.17. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique X paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? SECTION 3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 3.8.A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on X the environment? 3.8.B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of X greenhouse gases? SECTION 3.9 HA7ARDs&HA7ARDous MATERIALS 3.9•A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal X of hazardous materials? 3.9•B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and X accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 3.9•C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials,substances,or waste X within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? 3.9•D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to X Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? 3.9•E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport,would the project result in a X safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.9•F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency X evacuation plan? 3.9•G. Would the project expose people or structures,either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss,injury,or death X involving wildland fires? SECTION 3.10 HYDROLOGY&WATER QUALITY 3.io.A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade X surface or groundwater quality? 3.1o.B. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such X that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? 3.10.C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site;substantially increase the rate or amount of X surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on-or off-site;create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;or, impede or redirect flood flows? 3.io.D. In flood hazard,tsunami,or seiche zones,would the X project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? 3.io.E. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable X groundwater management plan? SECTION 3.11 LAND USE&PLANNING 3.ii.A. Would the project physically divide an established X community? 3.ii.B. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan,policy,or regulation X adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? SECTION 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES 3.12.A. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and X the residents of the State? 3.12.B. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a X local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p SECTION 3.13 NOISE 3.13.A. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local X general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies? 3.13.B. Would the project result in generation of excessive X groundborne vibration or ground-borne noise levels? 3.13.C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, X would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? SECTION 3.14 POPULATION&HOUSING 3.14.A. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area,either directly(for example,by X proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? 3.14.B. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing,necessitating the construction of replacement X housing elsewhere? SECTION 3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES 3.15.A. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which would cause X significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for fire protection? 3.15.B. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which would cause X significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for police protection? 3.15.C. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which would cause X significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for schools? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.15.D. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which would cause X significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for parks? 3.15.E. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,need for new or physically altered governmental facilities,the construction of which would cause X significant environmental impacts,in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for other public facilities? SECTION 3.16 RECREATION 3.i6.A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities X such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? 3.i6.B. Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might X have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SECTION 3.17 TRANSPORTATION 3.17.A. Would the project conflict with a plan,ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system,including transit,roadway, X bicycle and pedestrian facilities? 3.17.11. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA X Guidelines Section 15o64.3 subdivision(b)? 3.17.C. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous X intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? 3.17.D. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? X SECTION 3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.i8.A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource,defined in Public Resources Code Section 21o774 as either a site,feature,place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural X value to a California Native American tribe,and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 14 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.i8.B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource,defined in Public Resources Code Section 21o774 as either a site,feature,place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe,and that is a resource X determined by the Lead Agency,in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence,to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1,the Lead Agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. SECTION 3.19 UTILITIES&SERVICE SYSTEMS 3.i9.A. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water,wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,electric power,natural gas,or X telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? 3.i9.B. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development X during normal,dry and multiple dry years? 3.19.C. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the X project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? 3.i9.D. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards,or in excess of the capacity of local X infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? 3.i9.E. Would the project comply with Federal,State,and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid X waste? SECTION 3.20 WILDFIRE 3.2o.A. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project X substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? 3.2o.B. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project due to slope,prevailing winds,and other factors,exacerbate X wildfire risks,and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1-1 Initial Study Checklist Potentially Less than Lessthan Description of Issue Significant Significant Significant No Impact Impact with Impact Impact p Mitigation p 3.20.C. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure X (such as roads,fuel breaks,emergency water sources,power lines, or other utilities)that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? 3.2o.D. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project expose people or structures to significant risks,including X downslope or downstream flooding or landslides,as a result of runoff,post-fire slope instability,or drainage changes? SECTION 3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 3.21 A. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to X eliminate a plant or animal community,substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? 3.21.B. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are X considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects,the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects) 3.21.C. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly X or indirectly? SECTION 1•INTRODUCTION PAGE 16 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 PROJECT OVERVIEW The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The total gross land area would be 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres). According to the Tentative Tract Map No.20152,the vacant land would be divided into six(6)lots. Lot 1 would be 25,910 square feet. Lot 2 would be 27,523 square feet. Lot 3 would be 20,005 square feet. Lot 4 would be 27,729 square feet. Lot 5 would be 20,452 square feet. Additionally, there would also be a sixth lot,Lot"A"that would be 7,256 square feet.4 The proposed project is described in greater detail in Section 2.4. 2.2 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project site is located within the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. Regional access to Rancho Cucamonga is possible from three area freeways: State Route 210 (SR-210), which extends in an east-west orientation in the northern portion of the City; Interstate 15 (I-15), which extends in a north-south orientation in the eastern portion of the City; and, Interstate 10 (I-1o), which extends in an east-west orientation o.68 mile south of the City. Rancho Cucamonga is bounded by the San Gabriel Mountains to the north, the City of Ontario to the south, the City of Fontana and an unincorporated county area to the east,and the City of Upland to the west. Rectangular in shape,the proposed project site is comprised of one parcel and has a total of approximately 146,429 square feet of lot area(3.36 acres). The Assessor Parcel Number(APN)applicable to the proposed project site is 0225-181-73-0-0oo. The proposed project site is located in the VL(Very Low Residential) zone and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low Residential. The proposed project site is currently undeveloped. The location of the City of Rancho Cucamonga in a regional context is shown in Exhibit 2-1. A citywide map is provided in Exhibit 2-2 and a local map is provided in Exhibit 2-3. 4 W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc.Site Utilization Map,5 Lots Residential Subdivision—TR 20152.Sheet No.1.May 29,2019. SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Victonille sk laa Hesperi r ti I,2 's San Rancho Dimas Rialto Sal • La Verne Claremont Upland Cucamonga + ♦ + Fontana Berea din ♦ Colton Ontalio Poato"a Diamo id Gran B Slt-i�i, s� ee,,,n a o co. ty T ace w.emidec uuty Chino Ch o + Valley / Hill Sash al ,- • Riversid d� orco 4 1' Yorba o��`•G�� Linda s n SR-9� Villa f Park nh' Legend 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga rA County Boundaries nI Freeways EXHIBIT 2-1 REGIONAL MAP SOURCE:BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 18 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD i its �f Ole /// /� :.'lam ♦ .j, ij Upland Rancho Fontana Cucamonga _i Ontario San Bernardino County Ri—,.sidt-Countv Legend Project Site Jurupa Valley Freeways City Boundaries 0 County Boundaries EXHIBIT 2-2 CITYWIDE MAP SOURCE:BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL.PLANNING SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 19 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Banyan St Banyan St �o d �,ve Gu�lDr Cassia St Ara aho Rd w Chickasaw Rd SR-210 SR-210 Fisher Dr Norcia DrCu a w V Legend A O Project Site EXHIBIT 2-3 LOCAL Mar SOURCE:BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 20 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 2.3 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The proposed project site is located within an urbanized area of the City of Rancho Cucamonga that is primarily residential in nature. The proposed project site is currently undeveloped.5 Rectangular in shape, the proposed project site is comprised of one parcel and has a total of approximately 146,429 square feet of lot area (3.36 acres).6 The Assessor Parcel Number (APN) applicable to the proposed project site is 0225-181-73-0-0oo. The proposed project site is surrounded on all four sides by properties that are zoned VL(Very Low Residential)and developed with single-family residential uses.Notable uses in the vicinity of the proposed project site include Etiwanda Colony Elementary School,located 0.26 mile north of the proposed project site; Summit Intermediate School, located 0.29 mile northeast of the proposed project site; and, Etiwanda Creek Park, located 0.40 mile northeast of the proposed project site.? An aerial photograph depicting the proposed project site and the immediate area is provided in Exhibit 2-4. 2.4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.4.1 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The total gross land area would be 146,429 square feet(3.36 acres). According to the Tentative Tract Map No.20152,the vacant land would be divided into six(6)lots. Lot 1 would be 25,910 square feet. Lot 2 would be 27,523 square feet. Lot 3 would be 20,005 square feet. Lot 4 would be 27,729 square feet. Lot 5 would be 20,452 square feet. Additionally, there would also be a Lot"A"that would be 7,256 square feet. Lots 1 through 5 would be improved with single-family homes. A sixth lot,Lot A,would be located in between Lots 4 and 5 and would contain a bio retention system.$ All six lots would be located along Arapaho Road and would be accessible directly from Arapaho Road. The tentative tract map and the conceptual grading and drainage plans for the proposed project are provided in Exhibit 2-5 and 2-6,respectively. 2.4.2 CONSTRUCTION CHARACTERISTICS Construction of the proposed project would take approximately to months to complete. The key construction phases are outlined below: • Site Preparation. The proposed project site would be readied for the construction of the proposed project. This phase would take approximately one month to complete. 5 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site Survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2019. 6 W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc.Site Utilization Map,5 Lots Residential Subdivision—TR 20152.Sheet No.1.May 29,2019. 7 Google Earth. Website accessed August 30,2019. 8 W&W Land Design Consultants,Inc.Site Utilization Map,5 Lots Residential Subdivision—TR 20152.Sheet No.1.May 29,2019. SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 21 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD �U%L y Project Site JI wry. � � �' + �e• r_e_�J .�• fry � � - -�}_�_� � '! b ` •� r f � 1 log EXHIBIT 2-4 AERIAL MAP SOURCE:BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 22 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD E9LOL dY11 10Y1LL ,�i-X•tvl•H,-•�.e[gym, EfG.0 I�-V�N�4lb�f.]OI[Nltltl 1 � � Prl M 11 OW]N p1YdYL1Y]O P131SY3 Qw.. ss°oz ai-rQolslnloans�auNeals3a sioi s �. i g���! _! tile, ggp ��1 � �911 : . ..� R I�Ifi gill , Age Y 5 i l l l l l l t �,NMI �i tj aD i7 S s3 I n J ° a ill N Q W ' `{ {mod } �✓ i $ b O EXHIBIT 2-5 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SOURCE:W&W LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,INC. SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 23 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD NYId 3`JtlNlh'!IO F]HIOV'7!`�lVflld3�N0� ; _ E 9Ell6 va'WNa1M�m OF]NNJ i I MYWI0 h oroaandrarioa,3Lsr3 as�oz al-raolslnlosns�autieals3a slat s l g 9 MOM III m nR� @ kIF�1 Al 7.7 91 I I I I I i i ► �'�=�r��k��=; .. �_� -"3 4' J�x.M ___ &_ __-_•ram '.DTI:ice '� `�` ler � K. � I,: � `.f l i:fie� �I � -�J,�/ �h�{-.y •.''I.� � I 'd ��� a ii f 'I c`#}•'---�:::�'�f � ��`,� ,.`_ .� �� it r. �- _-tom•• - - - - �_ __ - .?!''� __ �� - e . )12 . o ',I Ajl EXHIBIT 2-6 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SOURCE:W&W LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS,INC. SECTION 2 0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • Grading. This phase would involve the grading of the site. The building footings,utility lines,and other underground infrastructure would be placed during this phase. The grading for the bio retention system would also take place during this phase. This phase would take approximately one month to complete. • Construction. The single-family homes would be constructed during this phase. This phase would take approximately five months to complete. • Paving. The proposed project site would be paved during this phase. This phase would take approximately two months to complete. • Landscaping and Finishing. This phase would involve the planting of landscaping, painting of the single-family homes, and the completion of other on-site improvements. This phase would last approximately one month. rVS. J1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 2•PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SECTION 2•PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 26 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This section of the Initial Study prepared for the proposed project analyzes the potential environmental impacts that may result from the proposed project's implementation. The issue areas evaluated in this Initial Study include the following: •Aesthetics(Section 3.1); •Mineral Resources(Section 3.12); •Agriculture&Forestry Resources(Section 3.2); •Noise(Section 3.13); •Air Quality(Section 3.3); •Population&Housing(Section 3.14); • Biological Resources(Section 3.4); •Public Services(Section 3.15); • Cultural Resources(Section 3.5); • Recreation(Section 3A6); • Energy(Section 3.6); •Transportation(Section 3.17); • Geology&Soils(Section 3.7); • Tribal Cultural Resources(Section 3A8); • Greenhouse Gas Emissions(Section 3.8); •Utilities&Service Systems(Section 3.19); •Hazards&Hazardous Materials(Section 3.9); • Wildfire(Section 3.20);and, • Hydrology&Water Quality(Section 3.10); • Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section • Land Use&Planning(Section 3.11); 3.21). Under each issue area, a description of the thresholds of significance is provided. These thresholds will assist in making a determination as to whether there is a potential for significant impacts on the environment. The analysis considers both the short-term (construction-related) and long-term (operational)impacts associated with the proposed project's implementation,and where appropriate,the cumulative impacts. To each question,there are four possible responses: • No Impact. The proposed project would not result in any adverse environmental impacts. • Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project may have the potential for affecting the environment,although these impacts would be below levels or thresholds that the City of Rancho Cucamonga or other responsible agencies consider to be significant. • Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The proposed project may have the potential to generate a significant impact on the environment. However,the level of impact may be reduced to levels that are less than significant with the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. • Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project may result in environmental impacts that are significant. This finding would require the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR). SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 2'7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3.1 AESTHETICS 3.1.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse aesthetic impact if it results in any of the following: • A substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista; • Substantial damage to scenic resources including,but not limited to,trees,rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway; • In non-urbanized areas,a substantial degradation to the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings (public views are those that are experienced from a publicly accessible vantage point); in an urbanized area, a conflict with the applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality;or, • A new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. 3.1.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project, except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 2logg, have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and is currently vacant and covered over in dirt. Those persons that would potentially experience the greatest change in views associated with the proposed project site's development from the public right-of-way,would be those persons travelling on East Avenue between Copley Drive(on the south) and Cassia Street (on the north). The dominant scenic views that are presently available include views of the San Gabriel Mountains,which are located 2.50 miles north of the proposed project site. Views of these mountains are partially obstructed due to existing development.9 The single-family homes that would be constructed would be comparable in height to the surrounding single-family homes. The size and massing of these residential structures would not be great enough to obstruct scenic views beyond the current level of obstruction of these views. The maximum height of the proposed new homes would be 35-feet which is consistent with the maximum building height requirements for structures within the City's Very Low Residential Zone District.It is important to note that the residential uses that surround the proposed project site are also zoned as Very Low Residential. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan recognizes the aforementioned San Gabriel Mountains as an important scenic resource as well as the"remaining stands of eucalyptus windrows,scattered vineyards and 9 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site Survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2oi 9. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 28 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD orchards, and natural vegetation in flood-control channels and utility corridors."1O. The proposed project will not visually impact these elements.As a result,less than significant impacts would occur. B. Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?•No Impact. According to the California Department of Transportation(Caltrans),none of the surrounding roadways are State-designated scenic highways and there are no State-designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the proposed project site.,, The nearest designated scenic highways are a portion of SR-91 (from SR-55 near Santa Ana Canyon to the eastern city limit of Anaheim),approximately 17 miles southwest of the proposed project site;and,a portion of SR-2(from 2.7 miles north of SR-210 at La Canada to San Bernardino county line),approximately 19 miles northwest of the proposed project site.The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan does not include any locally designated scenic highways.12. The proposed project site is currently undeveloped and there are no trees or rock outcroppings located within the proposed project site.13 Lastly, the proposed project site does not contain any buildings listed in the State or National Register (refer to Section 3.5,Cultural Resources). As a result,no impacts on scenic resources would result from the proposed project's implementation. C. Would the project's location, in a non-urbanized area, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings?(Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality?•No Impact. As previously mentioned,the proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The proposed project site is located in an urban area.Furthermore,the proposed project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. The construction of the five new housing units would conform to the City's General Plan and Zoning designations that are applicable to the project site With the site's development,the property would be improved and maintained.As a result,no impacts would result. D. Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?•Less than Significant Impact. Exterior lighting can be a nuisance to adjacent land uses that are sensitive to this lighting. This nuisance lighting is referred to as light trespass which is typically defined as the presence of unwanted light on properties located adjacent to the source of lighting. Glare is related to light trespass and is defined as visual 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga.Rancho Cucamonga 2olo General Plan Update.Draft Program Environmental Impact Report.(SCH No.200006io27.February 16,2010 11 California Department of Transportation. Official Designated Scenic Highways. http://www.dot.ca. og v/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/index.htm. 12 City of Rancho Cucamonga.Rancho Cucamonga 2oio General Plan Update.Draft Program Environmental Impact Report.(SCH No.200006io27.February 16,2010 �3 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 29 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD discomfort resulting from high contrast in brightness levels. Glare-related impacts can adversely affect day or nighttime views. As with lighting trespass,glare is of most concern if it would adversely affect sensitive land use or driver's vision. Nighttime glare and illumination have the potential to result in potentially significant impacts to sensitive receptors. Many sources of light contribute to the ambient nighttime lighting conditions. These sources of nighttime light include street lights,security lighting,wall packs and vehicular headlights. The proposed project site is surrounded on all sides by single-family homes. These single-family homes would not be exposed to spillover lighting during the evening hours because the proposed development would be residential in nature and would utilize lighting similar to that of the surrounding single-family homes. The proposed project would be required to comply with those provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.58.050, General Lighting Requirements). The more pertinent subsections include the following: "C. Shielding. Except as otherwise exempt, all outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights-of-way.Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way,so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. See Figure 17.58.050-2 (Shielding and Maximum Height of Freestanding Outdoor Light Fixtures). D.Level of illumination.Outdoor lighting shall be designed to illuminate at the minimum level necessary for safety and security and to avoid the harsh contrasts in lighting levels between the project site and adjacent properties.Illumination requirements are provided in Table 17.58.050-1 (Illumination Requirements)." Adherence to the aforementioned requirements would reduce the potential light and glare impacts to levels that less than significant. 3.1.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis determined that less than significant impacts related to scenic vistas,scenic resources,and light and glare are anticipated upon the implementation of the proposed project, therefore no mitigation measures are required. 3.2 AGRICULTURE&FORESTRY RESOURCES 3.2.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant impact on agriculture and forestry resources if it results in any of the following: • The conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,to non-agricultural uses; SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 30 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • A conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses,or a Williamson Act Contract; • A conflict with existing zoning for,or cause rezoning of,forest land(as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production(as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g)); • The loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use;or, • Changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. 3.2.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural uses?•No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation, the City of Rancho Cucamonga is primarily composed of Urban and Built-Up Land. Portions of Grazing Land and Other Land are located approximately 275 feet east of the proposed project site,on the east side of East Avenue (refer to Exhibit 3- 1).14 The project site is separated from these lands by a roadway and other uses.In addition,the site itself is not being used as grazing land. Since the implementation of the proposed project would not involve the conversion of Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural uses,no impacts would occur. B. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses, or a Williamson Act Contract?• No Impact. The proposed project site is located in the VL(Very Low Residential)zone and has a General Plan Land Use designation of Very Low Residential. The project site is not subject to a Williamson Act Contract. The proposed project would not require a zone change or general plan amendment, as the proposed use is permitted within the proposed project site(refer to Section 3.11.2.A). Since no zone change or general plan amendment would occur,no loss of land zoned for/or permitting agricultural uses would occur. In addition, the proposed project site would not conflict with a Williamson Act Contract.15 Since the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural uses or a Williamson Act Contract,no impacts would occur. �4 California Department of Conservation. California Important Farmland Finder. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. �5 California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Maps. https://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/wa/Pages/stats reports.asaxx. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 31 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD A Project SiteA'I` Part 0 Rime Farmland 0 Farmland of Statewide Importance Unique Farmland ❑ G—ing Land Farmland of Local Importance Farmland of Local Potential Other Land 0 Confined Animal Agriculture 0 Nonagncultural or Natural Vegetafion 0 Va—t or Disturbed Land MRural Residential Land _ 0 SemiagnmItural and Rural Commercial Land - 0 Urban and Bull Land ■ water Area A Inigated Farmland Nonirrigated Farmland N EXHIBIT 3-1 IMPORTANT FARMLAND IN RANCHO CUCAMONGA SOURCE:CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 32 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD C. Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of,forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g))?•No Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is located directly south of the San Bernardino National Forest. However, the proposed project site is located 2.50 miles south of the San Bernardino National Forest and does not contain any land zoned as forest land. As previously mentioned,the proposed project site is surrounded by residential uses and is zoned for residential uses. As a result,no impacts on forest land or timber resources would result from the proposed project's implementation. D. Would the project result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to a non forest use?•No Impact. No forest lands are located in the vicinity of the proposed project site. As a result,no loss or conversion of forest lands to urban uses would result from the proposed project's implementation and no impacts would occur. E. Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature,could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to a non forest use?•No Impact. The proposed project would not involve the disruption or damage of the existing environment that would result in a loss of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use because the proposed project site is not occupied by or designated for agricultural or forest uses. As a result,no impacts would result from the implementation of the proposed project. 3.2.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of agricultural and forestry resources indicated that no impacts on these resources would occur as part of the proposed project's implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.3 AIR QUALITY 3.3.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse environmental impact on air quality,if it results in any of the following: • A conflict with or an obstruction of the implementation of the applicable air quality plan; • A cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the proposed project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard; SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 33 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • The exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations;or, • Other emissions adversely affecting a substantial number of people. Air quality impacts may occur during the construction or operation phase of a project.These construction emissions or operational emissions may come from stationary sources (e.g., industrial processes, generators),mobile sources(e.g.,automobiles,trucks),or area sources(e.g.,offsite energy generation). The South Coast Air Quality Management District(SCAQMD)is the main regulatory authority in the region(the South Coast Air Basin,which includes the City of Rancho Cucamonga)with regard to air quality issues. In April 1993, the SCAQMD adopted a CEQA Air Quality Handbook that provides guidance for the CEQA analysis of potential air quality impacts of new projects. The topic of air quality can be divided into three categories: construction emissions and operational emissions. Construction of new projects has the potential to create air quality impacts through excavation and grading activities and through the use of heavy-duty equipment. Fugitive dust emissions result from land clearing, demolition, excavation, and equipment traffic over unpaved roads at construction sites. Mobile source emissions, primarily nitrogen oxides (NO.), result from the use of diesel-powered construction equipment such as bulldozers and trucks. Mobile source emissions also result from vehicle trips by construction workers to and from the proposed project site. A great percentage of fugitive dust emissions can be mitigated through the implementation of measures within Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, by SCAQMD.16 Operational emissions are produced by the occupants of a facility or development and by both mobile and stationary sources connected to the facility or development. Depending on the characteristics of the individual project,operational activities have the potential to generate emissions of criteria and/or toxic air contaminants. Stationary source emissions include point source emissions that have an identifiable location,such as a smokestack,as well as area source emissions,such as fumes or minor sources of exhaust, which are emitted by multiple, small sources. Mobile source emissions occur as a result of motor vehicle travel. The SCAQMD has established quantitative thresholds for short-term (construction) emissions and long-term(operational)emissions for the following criteria pollutants: • Ozone (03) is a nearly colorless gas that irritates the lungs, damages materials, and vegetation. Ozone is formed by photochemical reaction(when nitrogen dioxide is broken down by sunlight). • Carbon monoxide (CO)is a colorless, odorless toxic gas that interferes with the transfer of oxygen to the brain and is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels emitted as vehicle exhaust. • Nitrogen dioxide (NOZ) is a yellowish-brown gas, which at high levels can cause breathing difficulties. NOZ is formed when nitric oxide (a pollutant from burning processes) combines with oxygen. 16 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 403,Fugitive Dust. As amended June 3,2005. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 34 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent gas formed primarily by the combustion of sulfur- containing fossil fuels. Health effects include acute respiratory symptoms and difficulty in breathing for children. • PM,and PM2.5 refers to particulate matter less than ten microns and two and one-half microns in diameter,respectively. Particulates of this size cause a greater health risk than larger-sized particles since fine particles can more easily cause irritation. Projects in the South Coast Air Basin(Basin)generating construction-related emissions that exceed any of the following emissions thresholds are considered to be significant under CEQA: • 75 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds; • 1oo pounds per day of nitrogen dioxide; • 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide; • 150 pounds per day of PMIo; • 55 pounds per day of PM2.5; or, • 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides. A project would have a significant effect on air quality if any of the following operational emissions thresholds for criteria pollutants are exceeded: • 55 pounds per day of reactive organic compounds; • 55 pounds per day of nitrogen dioxide; • 550 pounds per day of carbon monoxide; • 150 pounds per day of PM,,,; • 55 pounds per day Of PM2.5; or, • 150 pounds per day of sulfur oxides. 3.3.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? • No Impact. The proposed project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin(Basin),which covers a 6,600 square- mile area within all of Orange County,the non-desert portions of Los Angeles County,Riverside County,and San Bernardino County. Measures to improve regional air quality are outlined in the SCAQMD's Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The most recent 2016 AQMP was adopted in March 2017 and was jointly prepared with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Southern California Association of Governments(SCAG),I7 The AQMP will help the SCAQMD maintain focus on the air quality impacts of major projects associated with goods movement,land use,energy efficiency,and other key areas of growth. Key elements of the 2016 17 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Final 2o16 Air Quality Plan. Adopted March 2017. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 35 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD AQMP include enhancements to existing programs to meet the 24-hour PM2.5 Federal health standard and a proposed plan of action to reduce ground-level ozone. The primary criteria pollutants that remain non- attainment in the local area include PM2.5 and ozone. Specific criteria for determining a project's conformity with the AQMP is defined in Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The Air Quality Handbook refers to the following criteria as a means to determine a project's conformity with the AQMP:i8 • Consistency Criteria 1 refers to a proposed project's potential for resulting in an increase in the frequency or severity of an existing air quality violation or its potential for contributing to the continuation of an existing air quality violation. • Consistency Criteria 2 refers to a proposed project's potential for exceeding the assumptions included in the AQMP or other regional growth projections relevant to the AQMP's implementation. In terms of Criteria 1, the proposed project's long-term (operational) airborne emissions would be below levels that the SCAQMD considers to be a significant impact(refer to the analysis included in the next section where the long-term stationary and mobile emissions for the proposed project are summarized in Table 3- 2). The proposed project would also conform to Consistency Criteria 2 since it would not significantly affect any regional population,housing,and employment projections prepared for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Projects that are consistent with their local general plan are considered consistent with the regional growth projections, since the RTP/SCS forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP.The proposed project is consistent with the City's General Plan designation that is applicable to the project site. In terms of Criteria 2, the proposed project would not conflict with the regional population forecast and distribution in the 2016 AQMP. The proposed project would feature five single-family homes. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household; therefore, the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family residential units and would contribute to a limited population growth within the City. Therefore, the proposed project is well within SCAG's population projections for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the proposed project would not violate Consistency Criteria 2. As a result, no impacts related to the implementation of the AQMP would result. B. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? • Less than Significant Impact. As indicated previously, the proposed project area is located in a non-attainment area for ozone and particulates (PM,o and PM2.5); therefore, the proposed project would be required to comply with the requirements of SCAQMD Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, which requires the implementation of Best Available Control Measures (BACM) for all fugitive dust sources, and the 2016 AQMP, which identifies BACMs and i8 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. April 1993• SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 36 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Best Available Control Technologies (BACT) for area sources and point sources, respectively. The construction of the proposed project must comply with Rule 403,which includes the following provisions: • For all cities and counties within the SCAQMD region, all unpaved demolition and construction areas shall be regularly watered up to three times per day during excavation, grading, and construction as required (depending on temperature, soil moisture, wind, etc.). Watering could reduce fugitive dust by as much as 55 percent. • Temporary dust covers shall be used on any piles of excavated or imported earth to reduce wind- blown dust. • The construction area shall be kept sufficiently dampened to control dust caused by grading and hauling,and at all times provide reasonable control of dust caused by wind. • All clearing, earth moving, or excavation activities shall be discontinued during periods of high winds(i.e.,greater than 15 mph),so as to prevent excessive amounts of fugitive dust. • All dirt/soil loads shall be secured by trimming, watering or other appropriate means to prevent spillage and dust. • All dirt/soil materials transported off-site shall be either sufficiently watered or securely covered to prevent excessive amount of dust. • General contractors shall maintain and operate construction equipment so as to minimize exhaust emissions. • Trucks having no current hauling activity shall not idle but be turned off. The contractors must also comply with the following regulatory compliance measures that are applicable to the proposed project's construction activities: • In accordance with Sections 2485 in Title 13 Of the California Code of Regulations,the idling of all diesel fueled commercial vehicles (weighing over 1o,000 pounds) during construction shall be limited to five minutes at any location. • In accordance with Section 93115 in Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations,operation of any stationary, diesel-fueled, compression-ignition engines shall meet specified fuel and fuel additive requirements and emission standards. • The proposed project shall comply with South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 1113 limiting the volatile organic compound content of architectural coatings. The aforementioned regulations are standard conditions required for every construction project undertaken in the City as well as in the cities and counties governed by the SCAQMD. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 37 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD The potential construction-related emissions from the proposed project were estimated using the computer model CalEEMod(V.2016.3.2)developed for the SCAQMD. The construction period is expected to last for approximately io months. As shown in Table 3-1, daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Therefore, the construction-related impacts associated with the proposed project would be less than significant. Table 3-1 Estimated Daily Construction Emissions Construction Phase ROG NO. I CO SO. Pm. Pm, Site Preparation(on-site) 2.47 25.73 12.6o 0.02 5.99 3.77 Site Preparation(off-site) 0.09 o.o6 0.75 0.00 0.20 0.05 Total Site Preparation 2.56 25.79 13.34 0.03 6.i9 3.82 Grading(on-site) 2.29 24.74 15.86 0.03 3.72 2.38 Grading(off-site) 0.25 6.75 1.66 0.02 0.70 0.20 Total Grading 2.54 31.48 17.52 0.05 4.42 2.58 Building Construction(on-site) 1.90 17.43 16.58 0.03 o.96 0.90 Building Construction(off-site) 0.05 0.32 0.43 0.00 1 0.12 0.03 Total Building Construction 1.95 17.75 17.00 0.03 1.o8 0.93 Paving 1.01 9.52 12.19 0.02 0.49 1 0.45 Paving 0.09 o.o6 0.76 0.00 0.22 o.o6 Total Paving 1.11 9.58 12.95 0.02 0.10 0.51 Architectural Coatings(on-site) 2.24 1.41 1.81 o.00 io.o8 o.o8 Architectural Coatings(off-site) 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.02 0.01 Total Architectural Coatings 2.25 1.41 1.89 0.00 0.10 0.09 Maximum Daily Emissions 2.56 31.48 17.52 0.05 6.19 3.82 Daily Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source:CalEEMod V.2o16.3.2.and Ganddini Group,Inc. Long-term emissions refer to those air quality impacts that would occur once the proposed project has been constructed and is operational. These impacts will continue over the operational life of the proposed project. The two main sources of operational emissions include mobile emissions and off-site emissions related to the production and consumption of energy. Table 3-2 depicts the estimated project operational emissions related to the proposed project's operation. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 38 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 3-2 Estimated Operational Emissions in lbs/day Emission Source ROG NOx CO SO. PM,O PM.., Area-wide(lbs/day) 0.22 o.o8 0.45 0.00 0.01 0.01 Energy(lbs/day) 0.00 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile(lbs/day) 0.10 o.65 1.19 0.00 0.35 0.10 Total(lbs/day) 0.33 0.77 1.66 0.01 0.36 0.11 Daily Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant Impact? No No No No No No Source:CalEEMod V.2016.3.2.and Ganddini Group,Inc. As indicated in Table 3-2, the projected long-term emissions are well below thresholds considered to represent a significant impact. Since the proposed project area is located in a non-attainment area for ozone and particulates (PM10 and PM2.5),the contractors will be required to adhere to all pertinent provisions of SCAQMD Rule 403 pertaining to the generation of fugitive dust during grading and/or the use of equipment on unpaved surfaces.19 The contractors would be responsible for being familiar with and implementing any pertinent best available control measures. As a result,less than significant impacts would occur. C. Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? • Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors refer to land uses and/or activities that are especially sensitive to poor air quality and typically include residences, board and care facilities, schools, playgrounds, hospitals, parks, childcare centers, and outdoor athletic facilities, and other facilities where children or the elderly may congregate.2O These population groups are generally more sensitive to poor air quality. The nearest sensitive receptors to the proposed project site include the single-family homes that are located adjacent to the proposed project site on all its sides. These sensitive receptors are shown in Exhibit 3-2. The SCAQMD requires that CEQA air quality analyses indicate whether a proposed project would result in an exceedance of localized emissions thresholds or LSTs. LSTs only apply to emissions at a fixed location and do not include off-site or area-wide emissions. The pollutants that are the focus of the LST analysis include the conversion of NOX to NO,; carbon monoxide (CO) emissions; PMIo emissions; and PM1.5 emissions. The use of the"look-up tables"is permitted since the construction of the proposed project would involve the disturbance of less than five acres of land area(the proposed project site has a total gross land area Of 3.36 acres). For purposes of the LST analysis, the receptor distance used was 25 meters since the nearest existing homes were located approximately 25 meters from the construction activity areas at their nearest point. �9 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 4o3,Fugitive Dust. As Amended June 3,2005. 20 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook,Appendix 9. As amended 2017. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 39 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD d Mts Projttl 3ilr _ - a WW Sensnirr Rrerptura �� �pR Sprisl[i5p RPCC�1tAf5 � "� Banyan St. S W _ SR-210 - - � f 3 EXHIBIT 3-2 SENSITIVE RECEPTORS MAP SOURCE:BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 40 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 3-3 Local Significance Thresholds Exceedance SRA 32 Allowable Emissions Threshold(lbs/day) Emission Project Emissions Project Emissions and a Specified Distance from Receptor Type (in(lbs/day) Type (in meters) Unmitigated Mitigated 25 50 100 200 500 NO. 42.47 42.47 Construction 270 303 378 486 778 CO 22.25 22.25 Construction 2,193 2,978 5,188 9,611 29,410 PM10 20.47 9.45 Construction 16 50 80 140 322 PMZ s 12.01 5.95 Construction 9 12 21 45 170 Source:CaIEEMod V.2o16.3.2. As previously mentioned,the contractors would be required to adhere to all pertinent provisions of SCAQMD Rule 403 pertaining to the generation of fugitive dust during grading and/or the use of equipment on unpaved surfaces.21 In addition,fugitive dust emission,which is responsible for PM1.and PM2.5 emissions, would further be reduced through the implementation of SCAQMD regulations related to fugitive dust generation and other construction-related emissions. These SCAQMD regulations are standard conditions required for every construction project undertaken in the City as well as in the cities and counties governed by the SCAQMD. Table 3-3 includes both emissions before the implementation of standard conditions and afterwards. Since only one Rule 403 standard condition is included and calculated within the CalEEMod air quality model(watering of dirt surfaces three times daily),the emissions would be lower than those listed in Table 3-3• Most vehicles generate carbon monoxide (CO) as part of the tail-pipe emissions; therefore, high concentrations of CO along busy roadways and congested intersections are a concern. The areas surrounding the most congested intersections are often found to contain high levels of CO that exceed applicable standards. These areas of high CO concentration are referred to as"hot-spots". Two variables influence the creation of a hot-spot and these variables include traffic volumes and traffic congestion. Typically,a hot spot may occur near an intersection that is experiencing severe congestion(a LOS E or LOS F).22 The proposed project would generate approximately 5o daily trips,with 5 trips occurring during the PM peak hours(refer to Section 3.17.2.A herein). The projected peak hour traffic would not significantly degrade any local intersection's level of service (LOS E or F). It is the traffic congestion that would potentially result in the creation of a carbon monoxide hot spot.For this project,the future traffic would not result in the creation of a carbon monoxide hot spot. As a result,the potential impacts would be less than significant. D. Would the project result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?•Less than Significant Impact. The SCAQMD has identified those land uses that are typically associated with odor complaints. These uses include activities involving livestock, rendering facilities, food processing plants, chemical plants, 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 4o3,Fugitive Dust. As Amended June 3,2005. 22"LOS"refers to"Level of Service." Refer to Section 3.17.2.A. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 41 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD composting activities, refineries, landfills, and businesses involved in fiberglass molding.23 The proposed project involves the construction of five residential units and would not involve odor-generating uses. Potential sources that may emit odors during construction include the use of architectural coatings,solvents, and asphalt paving. However, these construction-related emissions are temporary and will end once the construction phases have been completed.SCAQMD Rule i1o8 and 1113 limits the amount of volatile organic compounds from cutback asphalt and architectural coatings and solvents, respectively. Compliance with these SCAQMD regulations would reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant.Once the homes are occupied,no odors are anticipated. 3.3.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of air quality indicated that no impacts on these resources would occur as part of the proposed project's implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on biological resources if it results in any of the following: • A substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,policies, or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service; • A substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service; • A substantial adverse effect on State or Federally protected wetlands(including,but not limited to, marsh,vernal pool,coastal,etc.)through direct removal,filling,hydrological interruption,or other means; • A substantial interference with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors,or the impedance of the use of native wildlife nursery sites; • A conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance;or, • A conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community �3 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook,Appendix 9. As amended 2017. SECTION •ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIs PAGE 42 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or State habitat conservation plan. 3.4.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status species in local or regional plans, policies,or regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service?•No Impact. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and is currently vacant and covered over in dirt and unmaintained ruderal vegetation.The proposed project site is enclosed with chain-link fencing and does not contain any trees or vegetation.2¢ Due to the current state of the proposed project site and the level of development in the surrounding area, the proposed project site is not a suitable environment for any candidate, sensitive, or special status species. A review of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Bios Viewer indicated that there are currently six threatened or endangered species located within the Cucamonga Peak Quadrangle(the proposed project site is within the Cucamonga Peak Quadrangle).2$ These species are identified below: • The southern mountain yellow-legged frog is federally listed and State-listed as an endangered species. This frog is found in and around lakes, ponds, marshes, meadows, and streams within mountainous regions of California and Nevada.26 • The coastal California gnatcatcher is not likely to be found on-site due to the existing surrounding development and the lack of habitat suitable for the California gnatcatcher. The absence of coastal sage scrub,the coastal California gnatcatcher's primary habitat,further diminishes the likelihood of encountering such birds.27 • The willow flycatcher is State listed as an endangered bird species. This bird is small and has a fairly long,thin tail and wings. Its body is brownish olive with a slight yellow wash to the belly. They have two whitish wing bars and a white throat. They typically breed in shrubby areas with standing water or along streams.z8 • The southwestern willow flycatcher is not likely to be found on-site due to the surrounding urban �4 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2019. �5 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Bios Viewer. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/bios/?tool=cnddbQuick. Website Accessed on December 21,2018. 26 California,State of. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog Species Information. http://calfire.ca.gov/resource mgt/downloads/Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog SpeciesInformation.12 Mt.San Jacinto Natural History Association. Southern Mountain Yellow-Legged Frog. http://msjnha.org/mountain-yellow-legged-frog/. 27 Audubon. California Gnatcatcher(Polioptila californica). https://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/califomia-gnatcatcher. 28 National Audubon Society. Willow Flycatcher. htW://www.audubon.org/field-guide/bird/willow-flycatcher. The Cornell Lab of Ornithology. All About Birds. Willow Flycatcher. https:lLwww.allaboutbirds.org/guide/Willow Flycatcher/id. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 43 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD development and the lack of habitat suitable riparian habitat for this bird species.�9 • The Crotch bumble bee is not likely to be found on-site due to the existing surrounding development and the lack of habitat suitable for the Crotch bumble bee. This species is not likely to be found on- site due to the lack of open grassland and scrub within the proposed project site and the immediate area.30 • The San Bernardino kangaroo rat is a small rat of approximately 9 inches in length,tail included. This species occurs primarily in alluvial fan sage scrub (AFSS). As previously mentioned, AFSS occurs in washes and on gently sloping alluvial fans at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. This species is not likely to be found on-site due to the existing surrounding development and the lack of habitat suitable for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat.31 The proposed project site is a flat parcel of land dominated by non-native grasses and annual herbs. The proposed project site has been periodically mowed and tilled. It is also important to note that the site is surrounded on all four sides by single-family residential development. Small piles of yard waste were observed around the perimeter of the property,likely from adjacent residents. Dominant non-native plant species included rip-gut brome (Bromus diandrus) and red-stemmed filaree (Erodium cicutarium). Numerous other species were observed including wild oat (Auena fatua), foxtail barley (Hordeum murinum), soft chess (Bromus hordeaceus), white-stemmed filaree (Erodium moschatum), cheeseweed (Malua paruiflora) and Lamb's quarters (Chenopodium album). One native herb, rancher's fiddleneck (Amsinckia menzeisii), occurred throughout the property. Nearly all of these species are common weedy plants that occur on vacant lots throughout Southern California.32 A previous site survey was completed in 2oio and since that time,the site was rough graded,and the outline of the cul-de-sac road and housing pads remain discernible.The site is dominated by Russian thistle(Salsola tragus),known more commonly as tumbleweed. Several other non-native weeds also occur including big- leaved crownbeard (Verbesina encelioides), puncture vine (Tribulus terrestris), and common horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Common native weeds include jimson weed (Datura wrightii), annual bursage (Ambrosia acanthocarpa), doveweed (Eremocarpus setigerus) and telegraph weed (Heterotheca grandiflora).No native shrubs that make up sage scrub habitats occupied by the California gnatcatcher were observed.No coastal sage scrub or alluvial fan sage scrub habitat suitable for the California gnatcatcher was documented on the project site during a habitat assessment conducted in 2oio, and no suitable habitat occurs on the project site or in the immediate area currently. Based on the lack of suitable habitat, the apparent lack of habitat in the vicinity,and the lack of recent sightings of California gnatcatcher in the region, �9 United State Geological Survey. Southwestern Willow Flycatcher Habitat. hnp://sbsc.wr.usgs.gov/ors/research/projects/smLwJ wiflhab.asp. 30 NatureServe Explorer. http://explorer.natureserve.org/servlet/NatureServe?searchName=Bombus+crotchii. Website accessed August 12,2019. 31 San Bernardino County Department of Public Works. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat(Dipodomys paruus). http://cms.sbcouM.gov/dpw/Land/especies/KangarooRat.as�x. 32 Letter from Leatherman BioConsulting,Inc,dated October 2,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 44 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD the California gnatcatcher is not expected to occur on the project site at this time.33 Therefore,no impacts would occur. B. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,policies,regulations,or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service?•No Impact. As previously mentioned,there are five conservation areas located within the City and its Sphere of Influence area. A review of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper indicates that there are various waterways/wetlands within the City but does not identify any waterways/wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed project site(refer to Exhibit 3-3).34 Due to the current state of the proposed project site and the level of development in the surrounding area,the proposed project site does not offer a suitable habitat for any of the aforementioned rare and/or endangered species. As a result,no impacts on natural or riparian habitats would result from the proposed project's implementation. C. Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on State or Federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? •No Impact. As indicated in the previous subsection,the proposed project site and adjacent properties do not contain any natural wetland and/or riparian habitat.35 A review of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory,Wetlands Mapper indicates that there are various waterways/wetlands within the City but does not identify any waterways/wetlands in the vicinity of the proposed project site(refer to Exhibit 3-3).36 As a result,the proposed project would not impact any protected wetland area and no impacts would occur. D. Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory life corridors,or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?•No Impact. The site is surrounded by development and lacks suitable habitat for wildlife habitat. Furthermore,the site contains no natural hydrological features. Furthermore, the proposed project site is enclosed with chain- link fencing and does not contain any trees or vegetation.37 Since the site is surrounded by development on all sides and lacks suitable habitat, the site's utility as a migration corridor is restricted. Therefore, no impacts would result from the implementation of the proposed project. 33 Letter from Leatherman BioConsulting,Inc,dated October 2,2019. 34 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/Wetlands/data/Mapper.html. 3s Ibid. 36 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/Wetlands/data/Mapper.htTnl. 37 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 45 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD E. Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?•No Impact. As previously mentioned,there are five conservation areas located within the City and its Sphere of Influence area. The proposed project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The proposed project site is currently vacant and covered over in dirt and will involve the construction of five single-family homes. Furthermore,the proposed project would not conflict with a tree preservation policy or ordinance because there are no trees located within the proposed project site or within the adjacent right-of-way.38 As a result,no impacts would occur. F. Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,or other approved local,regional,or State habitat conservation plan? •No Impact. As previously mentioned,there are five conservation areas located within the City and its Sphere of Influence area. The proposed project would not conflict with any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. The proposed project site is currently vacant and covered over in dirt and would involve the construction of five single-family homes.39 As a result,no impacts would occur. 3.4.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of biological resources indicated that no impacts on these resources would occur as part of the proposed project's implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 38 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning.Site survey.Survey was conducted on August 29,2019. 39 Ibid. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 46 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD _LECEND _ .. .. _ etlands Estuarine and Marine ❑eepwater •�,�-:,- L] EstuarineandmarineWetland El FreshwaterErnergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond _ — Lake C', - Other 6. ,_ r,. - Riverine Project5ite !y rs YU n� ii.•y t a u i-�ru uwi # "3i r 41 T- �A EXHIBIT 3-3 WETLANDS MAP SOURCE:NATIONAL WETLANDS INVENTORY SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 47 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.5a THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as Lead Agency,a project may have a significant adverse impact on cultural resources if it results in any of the following: • A substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; • A substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of the CEQA Guidelines; • The disturbance of any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries. 3.5.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of the CEQA Guidelines?•No Impact. The proposed project site is vacant and undeveloped though it appears to have been periodically mowed or tilled and is surrounded on all four sides by residential development.Small piles of yard waste were observed around the perimeter of the property, likely from adjacent residents. On-site vegetation consists of non- native,invasive plant species.The site also appears to have been rough graded though the outline of the cul- de-sac road and housing pads remain discernible. Historic structures and sites are defined by local, State, and Federal criteria. A site or structure may be historically significant if it is locally protected through a local General Plan or historic preservation ordinance. A site or structure may be historically significant according to State or Federal criteria even if the locality does not recognize such significance. The State, through the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), maintains an inventory of those sites and structures that are considered to be historically significant. Finally,the U.S. Department of Interior has established specific Federal guidelines and criteria that indicate the manner in which a site,structure,or district is to be defined as having historic significance and in the determination of its eligibility for listing on the National Register of Historic Places.4o To be considered eligible for the National Register,a property's significance may be determined if the properly is associated with events,activities,or developments that were important in the past,with the lives of people who were important in the past,or represents significant architectural,landscape,or engineering elements. Specific criteria include the following: 40 U.S.Department of the Interior,National Park Service. National Register of Historic Places. http:/Ifocus.nps.gov/nrh/nrhp. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 48 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that are associated with the lives of significant persons in the past; • Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period,or method of construction,or that represent the work of a master,or that possess high artistic values,or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction;or, • Districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Ordinarily,properties that have achieved significance within the past 50 years are not considered eligible for the National Register. However, such properties will qualify if they are integral parts of districts that do meet the criteria or if they fall within the following categories: • A religious property deriving primary significance from architectural or artistic distinction or historical importance; • Districts, sites,buildings, structures, and objects that are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; • A building or structure removed from its original location that is significant for architectural value, or which is the surviving structure associated with a historic person or event; • A birthplace or grave of a historical figure of outstanding importance if there is no appropriate site or building associated with his or her productive life; • A cemetery that derives its primary importance from graves of persons of transcendent importance, from age,from distinctive design features,or from association with historic events; • A reconstructed building when accurately executed in a suitable environment and presented in a dignified manner as part of a restoration master plan,and when no other building or structure with the same association has survived; • A property primarily commemorative in intent if design, age, tradition, or symbolic value has invested it with its own exceptional significance;or, • A property achieving significance within the past 50 years if it is of exceptional importance.41 41 U.S.Department of the Interior,National Park Service. National Register of Historic Places. b-M://focus.nps.gov/nrhp. Website accessed September 12,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 49 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD A search of the National Historic Register indicated that two federally designated historic sites are located within the City:42 • Pacific Electric Etiwanda Depot,located at 7092 Etiwanda Avenue. • John Rains House,located at 7869 Vineyard Avenue. A search of the State Historic Register indicated that five State-designated historic sites are located within the City:43 • Christmas House,located at 924o Archibald Avenue. • Cucamonga Chinatown Site,located at 9591 San Bernardino Road. • Cucamonga Rancho Winery,located at 8916 Foothill Boulevard. • Milliken Ranch,located west of Haven Avenue and Arrow Route. • Sycamore Inn,located at 831.8 Foothill Boulevard. The proposed project site does not meet, or contain any structures that meet, any of the aforementioned criteria. The proposed project would be limited to the proposed project site and would not affect any existing resources listed on the National or State Register or those identified as being eligible for listing on the National or State Register. As a result, no impacts would be associated with the proposed project's implementation. B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to§15o64.5 of the CEQA Guidelines?•Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and has previously been modified and graded. The proposed project site is underutilized and covered over in dirt. Although the proposed project site and the surrounding areas have been subject to disturbance, the proposed project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. In addition, the proposed project would require grading. As a result, a mitigation measure is provided both in Section 3.5.3 and in Section 3.18 (Tribal Cultural Resources) to ensure that a tribal representative is present during construction-related ground-disturbing activities.Title 14; Chapter 3; Article 5; Section 15o64.5 of CEQA would apply in terms of the identification of significant archaeological resources and their salvage.As a result,the impacts would be less than significant with the implementation of the required mitigation.. 42 U.S.Department of the Interior,National Park Service. National Register of Historic Places. b-M://focus.nps.gov/nrhp. Website accessed September 12,2019. 43 California State Parks,Office of Historic Preservation. Listed California Historical Resources. Website accessed September 12, 2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 50 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD C. Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries?•Less than Significant Impact. There are no dedicated cemeteries located within or adjacent to the proposed project site boundaries.44 The proposed project would be restricted to the designated project site and would not affect any dedicated cemeteries. In addition,the proposed construction is not likely to neither discover nor disturb any on-site burials due to the level of urbanization present and the amount of disturbance sustained to accommodate the surrounding development. Ground disturbance would involve grading and earth-clearing activities for the installation of the grass and landscaping and other on-site improvements. In the unlikely event that remains are uncovered by construction crews, all excavation and grading activities shall be halted, and the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department would be contacted (the Department will then contact the County Coroner). In the even human remains are encountered during grading, certain requirements governed by the California Health and Safety Code (Section 7050.5) and Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.98. These Code requirements state that when Native American human remains are encountered,the County Coroner must be notified who will then then immediately notify those persons it believes to be most likely descended from the deceased Native American. In addition,a mitigation measure is provided in Section 3.18(Tribal Cultural Resources)to ensure that a tribal representative is present during construction-related ground-disturbing activities. As a result,the proposed construction activities are not anticipated to impact any interred human remains and the impacts would be less than significant. 3.5.3 MITIGATION MEASURES Although parts of the proposed project site have been subject to disturbance to accommodate the existing structures,the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance.As a result,the following mitigation is required to address the potential impacts on cultural resources: Mitigation Measure No. 1 (Cultural Resources). The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC.The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include,but are not limited to,pavement removal,pot-holing or auguring,grubbing,tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities,including construction activities,locations,soil,and any cultural materials identified.The on- site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measure No.2(Cultural Resources).Upon discovery of any archaeological resources,cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Google Earth.Website accessed December 27,2018. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 51 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleiio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically,the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and,if necessary,mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Section15o64.5[f])for historical resources.. Mitigation Measure No. 3 (Cultural Resources). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a "historical resource" or"unique archaeological resource", time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.5(f) for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21o83.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No. 4 (Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Public Resources Code Sections 21o83.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.5(Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact, SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Mitigation Measure No. 6 (Cultural Resources). Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum Of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial.The monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe,the qualified lead archaeologist,and the construction manager who will call the coroner.Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American,the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Mitigation Measure No. 7 (Cultural Resources). If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe,the term"human remains"encompasses more than human bones.In ancient as well as historic times,Tribal Traditions included,but were not limited to,the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture,are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Mitigation Measure No. 8(Tribal Cultural Resources). Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day,the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted,it may be determined that burials will be removed.The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags.All human remains,funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 53 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3.6 ENERGY 3.6.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on the environment if it results in the following: • A potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation;or, • A conflict with or obstruction of a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. 3.6.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in a potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful,inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation? • Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family home units. The proposed project would involve energy and natural gas consumption related to residential uses,which would not differ from the immediate surrounding single-family home uses. Table 3-4 below provides an estimate of electrical and natural gas consumption for the proposed project. As indicated in the table, the proposed project is estimated to consume approximately log,610 kilowatts(kWh)of energy on an annual basis. Table 3-4 Estimated Annual Energy Consumption Project Consumption Rate Total Project Consumption Electrical Consumption 35.2 million Btu/househould/yr 176 million Btu/yr I0,316 kWh/household/yr 51,580 kWh/yr Natural Gas Consumption 49.9 million Btu/househould/yr 250 million Btu/yr 14,624 kWh/household/yr 73,I20 kWh/yr Total* 74.8 million Btu/househould/yr 374 million Btu/yr 21,922 kWh/household/yr lo9,610 kWh/yr *Total energy consumption includes electrical,natural gas,propane and fuel oil/kerosene consumption. Consumption for biomass(wood),coal,district steam,and solar thermal are excluded. Electricity consumption from on-site solar photovoltaic generation(i.e.,solar panels)is included. Source:2015 Residential Energy Consumption Survey(RECS)Survey Data. It is important to note that the proposed project would include energy efficient fixtures. In addition, the energy consumption rates do not reflect the more stringent 2o16 California Building and Green Building Code requirements. The proposed project would be in accordance with the City's Building Code requirements and with Part 6 and Part ii of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations establishes energy conservation standards for new construction. These standards relate to insulation requirements,glazing,lighting,shading,and water and space heating systems. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 54 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Adherence to the above-mentioned regulations would reduce potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. B. Would the project conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency?•No Impact. The California Public Utilities Commission prepared an updated Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan in 2011 with the goal of promoting energy efficiency and a reduction in Greenhouse Gases (GHG). Assembly Bill iiog,which was adopted in 2007,also serves as a framework for lighting efficiency. This bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to adopt minimum energy efficiency standards structured to reduce average statewide electrical energy consumption by not less than 50% from the 2007 levels for indoor residential lighting and not less than 25% from the 2007 levels for indoor commercial and outdoor lighting by 2o18. As indicated previously, the proposed project would involve energy and natural gas consumption related to residential uses, which would not differ from the immediate surrounding single-family home uses. Adherence to the City's Building Code requirements and with Part 6 and Part 11 of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations would ensure conformance with the State's goal of promoting energy and lighting efficiency. As a result,the proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct a State or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency and no impacts would occur. 3.6.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The preceding analysis concluded that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts that would warrant mitigation. 3.7 GEOLOGY&SOILS 3.7.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on the environment if it results in the following: • Substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; or, landslides; • Substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil; • Location of the project on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse; SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD • Location of the project on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-i-B of the Uniform Building Code (2012),creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property; • The project having soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater; or, • The direct or indirect destruction of a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. A geotechnical report was prepared for the project site by Associated Soils Engineering,Inc. 3-7.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recentAlquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologistfor the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault; strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction; or,landslides?•Less than Significant Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is located in a seismically active region(refer to Exhibit 3-4). Many major and minor local faults traverse the entire Southern California region,posing a threat to millions of residents, including those who reside in the City. Rancho Cucamonga,like the rest of southern California,is located within a seismically active region as a result of being located near the active margin between the North American and Pacific tectonic plates. The principal source of seismic activity is movement along the northwest-trending regional faults such as the San Andreas,San Jacinto,Newport-Inglewood and Whittier- Elsinore fault zones. The Etiwanda Avenue Fault is the closest known fault to the proposed project site. This fault is located approximately one mile to the north.45 The proposed project site is not located within the fault zone of the Etiwanda Avenue Fault(refer to Exhibit 3-4). The Site is likely to be subject to strong seismic ground shaking during the life of the project. The Cucamonga Fault, located approximately 2.0 miles(3.2 km)away is closest to the Site.Other nearby active faults include the San Jacinto-San Bernardino Fault and the San Andreas Fault,located approximately 5.4 miles (8.7 km) and 9.3 miles (15.o km) away, respectively.46 The potential impacts in regard to ground shaking and fault rupture are less than significant since the risk is no greater in and around the proposed project site than for the rest of the area. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), liquefaction is the process by which water-saturated sediment temporarily loses strength and acts as a fluid. Essentially,liquefaction is the process by which the ground soil loses strength due to an increase in water pressure following seismic activity. The proposed project site is not located in an area that is subject to liquefaction(refer to Exhibit 3-5)• 45 Toll-Free Airline.Los Angeles County Public and Private Airports,California. http://www.tollfreeairline.com/califomia/losangeles.htm. 46 Associated Soils Engineering,Inc.Soil Report and Geotechnical Study prepared for Manning Homes.February 20 2014. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 56 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD r1 IT- \1j~ Legend Project Site Freeways b Earthquake Fault Trace NEarthquake Fault Zone EXHIBIT 3-4 NEARBY FAULTS SOURCE:CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 57 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 5AN B �RN" DINO NATIONAL FOREST Day~ 1't• + ; Canyon i l � �•'� —J ❑eer, East _ [ Canyon\, �• Etwanda •� � \, I;I Canyon \. �.� San �� Scwane �i L •1gw1 'r Canyon CITY OF I! � FONTANA Welde R y Project Site ��, i�� Ch ill y.n an at = TT f sal.RpM :;EL-1 d.St 8 r Landslides Potential for sei sm i cally-in d uced roc Val l- c: s Based on slope steepness and the xi presence of granitic boulders- i Liquefaction Foothil IWd J I%• Potential liquefaction areas- Groundwateris locally perched within 50 a L a' i feet of the ground surrace- = 1 z N,HA Epi to• m 1 Potential for regional seismic settlement -k-- .YBh I �..� t� •• Rancho Cucamonga City Boundary —• Sphere of Influence Metrolirt ® --- --- Waterways ! Station n -J J I•��� EXHIBIT 3-5 GEOTECHNICAL HAZARDS SOURCE:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 58 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Lastly,the proposed project site is level and,as a result,is not subject to the risk of landslides(refer to Exhibit 3-5)•As a result,the potential impacts in regard to ground-shaking,liquefaction, and landslides would be less than significant because the risk is no greater in and around the proposed project site than for the rest of the area. B. Would the project result insubstantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? •No Impact. The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Web Soil Survey was consulted to determine the nature of the soils that underlie the proposed project site. According to the USDA Web Soil Survey,the site is underlain by soils of the Tujunga gravelly loamy sand association,o to 9 percent slopes. These soils have a low runoff and erosion hazard;furthermore,construction activities and the placement of permanent vegetative cover would reduce the soil's erosion risk.47 The site is,and would continue to be,level and no slope failure or landslide impacts would occur. Furthermore, construction is regulated by Chapter 19.04(Grading Standards)of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides requirements for construction, grading, excavations, use of fill, and foundation work including type of materials,design,procedures,etc.,which are intended to limit the probability of occurrence and the severity of consequences from sedimentation and erosion. In addition,all grading activities require grading permits from the Department of Building and Safety, which include requirements and standards designed to limit potential impacts to acceptable levels. Compliance with regulatory measures would ensure a less than significant impact would occur with respect to erosion or loss of topsoil during the construction phase. The potential for soil erosion during the occupancy of the building is low due to the generally level topography of the proposed project site, and the fact that the site would be covered over in impervious surfaces with limited soil being exposed. As a result,impacts would be less than significant. C. Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable,or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse?•Less than Significant Impact. Lateral spreading is a phenomenon that is characterized by the horizontal, or lateral, movement of the ground. Lateral spreading could be liquefaction-induced or may be the result of excess moisture within the underlying soils. Lateral spreading,a phenomenon associated with seismically induced soil liquefaction,is a display of lateral displacement of soils due to inertial motion and lack of lateral support during or post liquefaction. It is typically exemplified by the formation of vertical cracks on the surface of liquefied soils, and usually takes place on gently sloping ground or level ground with nearby free surface such as drainage or stream channel. Since there is no presence of"free surface" (unlined slopes, excavations, channels, etc.) on or near by the Site,the potential for the occurrence of seismically induced lateral spreading is unlikely on the site. Ground accelerations emitted from a seismic event can cause densification of loose soils both above and below the groundwater table that may result in settlements on ground surface due to volumetric compression of soil mass.This phenomenon is often referred to as seismic settlement and commonly takes 47 United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey.https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/Ann/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 59 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD place in relatively clean sands,as well as soils with low plasticity and less fines.Although the earth materials on site consist of loose to very dense silty sands and sands with silt and gravel, and firm to very stiff fine- grained soils, and the granular and silty soils are considered non-liquefiable due to deep groundwater beneath the site, they may still undergo seismically induced settlement during a major earthquake. Settlement as a result of seismically induced volumetric densification in these soil strata above groundwater level during a MCE event is anticipated to be less than one (1) inch with negligible differential settlement across each building pad due to the relatively uniform geology in the vicinity of the site.As a result, the impacts will be less than significant. D. Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code(2o12), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? 9 Less than Significant Impact. According to the USDA Web Soil Survey,the soils that underlie the proposed project site possess a low shrink swell potential. Shrinking and swelling is influenced by the amount of clay present in the underlying soils. As mentioned in the previous section(Section 3.7.2.C),the Tujunga gravelly loamy sand soils that underlie the proposed project site are composed of little to no amounts of clay,therefore a potential for subsidence does not exist. Furthermore, construction is regulated by Title 15 (Buildings and Construction) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides requirements for construction, grading, excavations, use of fill, and foundation work including type of materials, design, procedures, etc. Prior to grading operations, it will be necessary to remove any remaining existing improvements, including any remaining buried obstructions, which may be in the areas of proposed construction. Structure removal should include foundations. Concrete flatwork, if present, should also be removed from areas of proposed construction. Concrete fragments from site demolition operations should be disposed of off-site, unless they can be stockpiled and processed to meet the specifications for crushed miscellaneous base,processed miscellaneous base,or pulverized miscellaneous base as outlined in Sections 200-2.4, 200-2.5 or 200-2.8, respectively, of the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction and reused as Select Fill or base material. Compliance with regulatory measures would ensure a less than significant impact would occur with respect to expansive soils. E. Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?• Less than Significant Impact. Septic tank systems will be used to handle waste that will be generated by the proposed residential units. The Applicant retained the services of a geotechnical consultant to evaluate the ability of the subsurface soils to handle the proposed septic tank systems. The study prepared by Associated Soils Engineering, Inc. concluded that the underling soils would not present a constraint the proposed project site's development. As a result,the potential impacts would be less than significant. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 6o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD F. Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature?•Less than Significant Impact. Although the proposed project site is not currently developed,the surrounding project area is fully developed and has undergone disturbance as part of previous development. For this reason, the likelihood of discovering near surface paleontological resources is considered remote. According to the State of California Geological Survey, the site's geology is classified as "Young Alluvial Fan Deposits" (Qyf).48 Alluvial soil deposits that are present in a natural and undisturbed condition may contain paleontological resources, though these resources are more typically found in marine terraces and shales. These alluvial soils were encountered in each of ASE's borings to the maximum explored depth of 25 feet. For the most part, the majority of the grading activities will be above this elevation so as to remove the artificial fill. The on-site soils that underlie the property are Holocene-aged deposits that have a low potential for the discovery of paleontological resources. However,based on a records search conducted for the City by the San Bernardino County Museum,previous geologic mapping of the City and the Sphere of Influence area indicates that soils and geologic formations within the City and the Sphere of Influence area have a low potential to contain significant paleontological resources. In the event that evidence of such resources is discovered during excavation,all work within the vicinity would stop until a qualified paleontologist could assess the find. As a result,the potential impacts would be less than significant. 3.7.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impacts related to geology and soils. As a result,no mitigation measures are required. 3.8 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 3.8.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE A project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on greenhouse gas emissions if it results in any of the following: • The generation of greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment;or, • A conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. 3.8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS A. Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment?•Less than Significant Impact. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions refer to a group of emissions that have the potential to trap heat in the 48 California Geological Survey. Compilation of Quaternary Surficial Deposits. Website accessed August 9,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 61 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD atmosphere and consequently affect global climate conditions. Scientific studies have concluded that there is a direct link between increased emission of GHGs and long-term global temperature. The principal GHGs are carbon dioxide(CO2),methane(CH4),nitrous oxide(N2O),sulfur hexafluoride(SF6),perfluorocarbons (PFCs),hydrofluorocarbons(HFCs),nitrogen trifluoride(NFA and water vapor(H2O). CO,is the reference gas for climate change because it is the predominant greenhouse gas emitted. To account for the varying warming potential of different GHGs,GHG emissions are often quantified and reported as CO,equivalents (CO2E). Scientific evidence indicates there is a correlation between increasing global temperatures/climate change over the past century and human-induced levels of GHG. These and other environmental changes have potentially negative environmental,economic,and social consequences around the globe. GHG differ from criteria or toxic air pollutants in that the GHG emissions do not cause direct adverse human health effects. Rather,the direct environmental effect of GHG emissions is the increase in global temperatures,which in turn has numerous impacts on the environment and humans. For example, some observed changes to include shrinking glaciers,thawing permafrost,late freezing and early break-up of ice on rivers and lakes, a lengthened growing season,shifts in plant and animal ranges,and earlier flowering of trees. Other,longer term environmental impacts of global warming may include a rise in sea level, changing weather patterns with increases in the severity of storms and droughts, changes to local and regional ecosystems,including the potential loss of species,and a significant reduction in winter snow pack. It is important to note that the proposed project is an "infill"development,which is seen as an important strategy in combating the release of GHG emissions. Infill development provides a regional benefit in terms of a reduction in Vehicle Miles Traveled(VMT) since the proposed project is consistent with the regional and State sustainable growth objectives identified in the State's Strategic Growth Council (SGC).49 Infill development reduces VMT by recycling existing undeveloped or underutilized properties located in established urban areas. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. The proposed project's operational GHG emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. The type of activities that may be undertaken once the proposed project is operational have been predicted and accounted for in the model for the selected land use type. The SCAQMD has established a single quantified threshold of 3,000 metric tons Of CO2E (MTCO2E) per year for new residential development.50 Carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2E, is a term that is used for describing different greenhouses gases in a common and 49 California Strategic Growth Council. httl2://www.sgc.ca.gov/Initiatives/infill-develoi2ment.html. Promoting and enabling sustainable infill development is a principal objective of the SGC because of its consistency with the State Planning Priorities and because infill furthers many of the goals of all of the Council's member agencies. Focusing growth toward infill areas takes development pressure off conservation lands and working lands;it increases transit rider-ship and reduces vehicle trips;it requires less per capita energy and water use than less space-efficient development;it improves public health by promoting active transportation and active lifestyles;and it provides a more equitable mix of housing choices,among other benefits. 50 SCAQMD.Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group Meeting#15. https://planning.lagiiy.org/eir/8i.r;oSunset/References/a.E.%2oGreenhouse%2oGas%2oEmissions/GHG.�A SCAQMD%2oGHG%2 oMeetin9%2O15.pdf. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 62 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD collective unit. Table 3-5 summarizes annual greenhouse gas (COZE) emissions from build-out of the proposed project.51 Table 3-5 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory GHG Emissions Lbs Da Source CO2 CH N2O CO2E Maximum Construction Emissions 3,891-I0 Leo -- 3,921-04lbs/day Total Construction Emissions 649 MTCO.E/year Long-term Area Emissions 0.74 7.2oe-4 -- 0.76 lbs/day Long-term Energy Emissions 49.31 9.5oe-4 9.00e-4 49.60 lbs/day Long-term Mobile Emissions 458.64 0.02 -- 459.191bs/day Total Long-term Emissions 508.69 0.02 9.00e-4 509.55lbs/day Total Lon -term Emissions MTCO2E 84 MTCO.E/year Source:CalEEMod V.2o16.3.2 As indicated in Table 3-5,the CO2E total(operational)for the proposed project is 509.55 pounds per day or 0.23 MTCOZE per day. This translates into an annual emission of 84 MTCO2E. The CO2E total (construction)for the proposed project is 3,921.04 pounds per day or 1.78 MTCO2E per day. This translates into an annual emission of 649 MTCO2E. As a result,the proposed project would not generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or indirectly,that may have a significant impact on the environment and the potential impacts would be less than significant. B. Would the project conflict with an applicable plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases?•No Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga adopted the Sustainable Community Action Plan in 2017. The Plan states that in total,existing actions,state programs,and the goals,policies,and actions identified in the Sustainable Community Action Plan will reduce GHG emissions in Rancho Cucamonga up to 16.9 percent by the year 2020. The proposed project would not be in conflict with the goals and policies listed within each of the following categories:Transportation&Mobility,Land Use&Open Space,Energy Efficiency&Renewables, Green Building Performance,Water&Wastewater, and Waste&Recycling.52 As indicated previously, the operation of the proposed project would result in an incremental increase in GHG emissions. However,the operation of the proposed project would result in less than significant GHG emissions. The proposed project would not introduce any conflicts with adopted initiatives that are designed to control future GHG emissions. The proposed project is an infill development and is seen as an important strategy in reducing regional GHG emissions. As a result,the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan,policy,or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases and no impacts would occur. 51 The CaIEEMod Air Quality Worksheets are provided in Appendix A. 52 Rancho Cucamonga,City of. Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan. April 2017. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 63 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3•8.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of potential impacts related to GHG emissions indicated that the proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts. As a result,no mitigation measures are required. 3.9 HAzARDs &HAzARDous MATERIALS 3.9.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact regarding hazards or hazardous materials if it results in any of the following: • The creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use,or disposal of hazardous materials; • The creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment; • The emission of hazardous emissions or the handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; • The location of the project on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result,the creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment; • A safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area for a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport; • The impairment of the implementation of or the physical interference with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan;or, • The exposure of people or structures,either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss,injury, or death involving wildland fires. 3.9.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport,use,or disposal of hazardous materials?•No Impact. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. During construction activities,requirements must be adhered to regarding the transport and handling of fuels and lubricants for the construction equipment used on-site.In the event of a fuel spill,measures must be taken to quickly clean SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 64 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD up any spilled fuels to prevent further contamination of the nearby environment.The proposed project,once occupied and used as residences, would not be involved in the transport, use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials other than common commercial products used in a household setting for routine landscaping,maintenance,and cleaning. As a result,no impacts would occur. B. Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment?•No Impact. Due to the nature of the proposed project, the proposed residential project, once occupied, would not be involved in the transport,use,storage,and disposal of hazardous materials other than common commercial products used in a household setting for routine landscaping, maintenance, and cleaning. During construction activities,requirements must be adhered to regarding the transport and handling of fuels and lubricants for the construction equipment used on-site.In the event of a fuel spill, measures must be taken to quickly clean up any spilled fuels to prevent further contamination of the nearby environment. The proposed project site is not located on the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's (DTSC's) Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List-Site Cleanup(Cortese List).53 In addition,the proposed project site is not identified on any Leaking Underground Storage Tank database (LUST).54 A search through the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's Envirostor database indicated that the proposed project site was not included on any federal or State clean up or Superfund lists.55 Therefore, no impacts would occur. C. Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances,or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?•No Impact. No schools are located within one-quarter mile of the proposed project. The nearest schools include Etiwanda Colony Elementary School, located o.26 miles north of the proposed project site; Summit Intermediate School,located 0.29 miles northeast of the proposed project site.56 As previously mentioned, the proposed project would be involved in residential uses and would not involve the emission or handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Therefore,the proposed project would not create a hazard to any local school and no impacts would occur. D. Would the project be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?•No Impact. The Cortese List, also referred to as the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List or the California 53 htWs://calei2a.ca.gov/sitecleanul2/corteselist/ 54 California State Water Resources Control Board.GeoTracker. htWs:/lgeotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runrel2ort&myaddress=lahabra.ca. 55 CaIEPA.Envirostor.htt://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/ ublic/map/?global id=&x=- u 1=.,37&zl=18&ms=6ao.a8o&mt=m&findaddress=True&city=Los Angeles. 56 Google Earth. Website accessed August 30,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 65 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Superfund List, is a planning document used by the State and other local agencies to comply with CEQA requirements that require the provision of information regarding the location of hazardous materials release sites. California Government Code section 65962.5 requires the California Environmental Protection Agency to develop and update the Cortese List on annually basis. The list is maintained as part of the DTSC's Brownfields and Environmental Restoration Program referred to as EnviroStor. A search of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control Envirostor website was conducted and it was determined that the proposed project site is not identified as a Cortese site and that no Cortese sites are located within the City.57 Therefore,no impacts would occur. E. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area?•No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport. The nearest public airport to the proposed project site is the Ontario International Airport,which is located 6.45 miles southwest of the proposed project site.58 The proposed project is not located within the Runway Protection Zones (RPZ) of the Ontario International Airport nor is the site located within the airport's 6o Community Noise Equivalent Level(CNEL)boundary. The proposed project would not introduce any new structures that could penetrate the designated slopes for any of the aforementioned airports. Essentially, the proposed project would not introduce a building or structure that would interfere with the approach and take-off of airplanes utilizing the Ontario International Airport and would not risk the safety of the people residing or working in the proposed project site or the surrounding area. As a result,the proposed project would not present a safety or noise hazard related to aircraft or airport operations at a public use airport to people residing or working in the proposed project area and no impacts would occur. F. Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?•No Impact. The proposed project site is located at the end of a cul-de-sac. All construction staging areas would be located within the proposed project site and at no time would any of the surrounding streets be completely closed to traffic. As a result, the proposed project would not impair the implementation of, or physically interfere with,an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan and no impacts would result from the proposed project's implementation. G. Would the project expose people or structures,either directly or indirectly,to a significant risk of loss, injury,or death involving wildland fires?•Less than Significant Impact. The area surrounding the proposed project site is urban and there are no areas containing natural vegetation that could lead to a wildfire.59 However, Rancho Cucamonga is located 2.50 miles south of the base of the 57 hM2s://calepa.ca.gov/Sitecleanup/Corteselist/ 58 Toll-Free Airline.Los Angeles County Public and Private Airports,California. http://www.tollfreeairline.com/califomia/losangeles.htm. 59 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. Survey was conducted on December 19,2018. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 66 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD San Gabriel Mountains. This proximity creates the potential for natural hazards. Rancho Cucamonga's location adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest and San Gabriel Mountains puts it at high risk for Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) fires. This type of fire begins in the chaparral north of the City and can spread to structures in those areas and on the perimeter of the City. Open spaces along the foothills can lead to wildland fires,endangering residential properties that abut the wildland/urban interface. The threat of fire to hillside developments at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains is of real concern to Rancho Cucamonga residents living in the foothills. In 2003,the Grand Prix Fire burned through the entire Wildland Urban Interface(WUI)area of Rancho Cucamonga over a three-day period. Fifteen homes,three of which were in the City and twelve in the Sphere of Influence, were destroyed and more were damaged. Thousands of homes were threatened and evacuated. Exhibit 3-11 within Section 3.20(Wildfire)illustrates the fire hazard severity zones identified by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention(CAL Fire). As part of a comprehensive plan to protect Rancho Cucamonga from the threats of wildland fires,the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD)has established recommendations for fire prevention, public education,strategic locations of new fire stations,reduction and modification of vegetation,assurance of adequate water supply,and strict access provisions related to new development.The proposed project site is located on the edge of a very high fire hazard severity zone. However, the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan outlines various policies for wildfire abatement. These policies include: • Policy LU-8.9: Restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by natural or man-made hazards. Certain portions of the City are vulnerable to flooding and wildfire damage. Though other hazards exist,these two are the most prevalent. The City wants to make sure that intensities of development in areas vulnerable to these hazards are kept to a minimum and,in the limited cases where they do occur,that life and property are protected to the maximum degree feasible. • Policy LU-10.2: Encourage the planting of edible landscapes, using citrus trees, box gardens, vineyards, and other edible plant materials whenever possible. Edible landscaping is the process of planting edible plants in spaces other than in a traditional garden. Edible landscapes save space as they combine landscaping and food-growing into a single space. It is a very sustainable method of landscaping that refers back to Rancho Cucamonga's beginnings as an agrarian community. Converting power line utility corridors to this use can promote and preserve the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga while significantly reducing the fire hazards presented by these uninterrupted rights of way. Utility corridors and the invasive grasses that they support have a high potential for transporting hillside wildfires into the residential and urban areas of the City. • Policy LU-10.3:Promote low water usage,and emphasize fire-safe defensible space.With water a limited resource and wild fires a constant threat,the use of drought tolerant or fire resistant plant material is required. • Policy RC-3.2:Encourage the conversion of water-intensive turf/landscape areas to landscaping that uses climate-appropriate plants, efficient irrigation systems, and water efficient site maintenance.To conserve water resources and control maintenance costs,the City's current Water Efficiency Ordinance discourages extensive use of non-native vegetation that requires excessive SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 67 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD watering. In particular, the Water Efficiency Ordinance specifies the use of drought tolerant and fire-resistant vegetation with an emphasis on native species. The City updates its Water Efficiency Ordinance based on the State Department of Water Resources model ordinance,which allows for artificial turf. • Policy RC-8.6: Consult with the Fire District, San Bernardino County, and State agencies to develop plans that protect open space from fire hazards.Over the years,the City has learned a great deal on how landscape design can minimize the risk from fire hazards. The Fire District has been proactive in defining standards and implementing those standards throughout the City. • Policy PS-1.1:Reduce the loss of life,property,and injuries incurred as a result of fires by offering and supporting comprehensive fire prevention, public education, and emergency response programs. Fire hazards pose a threat to Rancho Cucamonga residents,especially in areas near the Wildland Urban Interface(WUI). Fire prevention is effective when it includes public education and appropriate land use restrictions,as well as adequate facilities and personnel to mitigate fires when they occur. The Fire District is expected to continually develop effective prevention and response strategies to address this constant risk. • Policy PS-1.2:Strive to limit loss of life and property as a result of wildland fires through adequate wildland fire protection services, education and enforcement of defensible space and brush clearance requirements,and wildland fire evacuation and preparedness plans.The dry vegetation north of the City is conducive to quick moving and high-heat fires that can spread rapidly and cause damage to structures and homes. The Fire District shall routinely assess the current threat to life and property in the WUI. Needs for improvements in response capability would be identified. The City should also expand the existing education and warning system that can be activated following significant wildland fires on the hillsides above the City. Education efforts can include mailers to households in the affected areas, public meetings, and/or door-to-door education campaigns that inform the public of wildland fire safety tips and procedures. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes within a project site that is surrounded by existing single-family homes. Compliance with the abovementioned policies will ensure that the impacts would remain less than significant. 3.9.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of potential impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials indicated that the proposed project would not result in any adverse impacts. As a result,no mitigation measures are required. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 68 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAFAHo ROAD 3.10 HYDROLOGY&WATER QUALITY 3.10.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse environmental impact on hydrology and water quality if it results in any of the following: • A violation of any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or an otherwise substantial degradation of surface or groundwater quality; • A substantial decrease of groundwater supplies or a substantial interference with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin; • A substantial alteration of the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on-or off-site; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;or,impede or redirect flood flows; • The risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation in flood hazard,tsunami,or seiche zones; or, • A conflict with or an obstruction of implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. 3.10.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality?•Less than Significant Impact. In urban settings, stormwater runoff is typically conveyed into a storm drain system and ultimately discharged to the receiving waters at a specific location. Hence, these storm drain system discharges are treated as point sources. Stormwater runoff is part of the natural hydrologic cycle. Drainage patterns and pollutant concentrations are frequently altered through processes such as urbanization and agriculture. Recent studies have indicated that stormwater runoff is a significant source of water pollution. Stormwater runoff encompasses urban runoff, which includes the discharge of pollutants to water bodies from non- storm related activities such as irrigation, hosing sidewalks, draining swimming pools, washing cars and illegal discharges to the storm drain system,such as unauthorized connections,leaks,or spills. Construction activities may also result in the discharge of stormwater runoff pollutants. The proposed project site is currently vacant and covered over in dirt. However,the proposed project site is located among residential uses and is located in an area that has previously been modified and graded to SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 69 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD accommodate the surrounding residential uses. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. Upon the proposed project's completion, a large portion of the proposed project site would be covered over in pervious surfaces(grass and landscaping).A total of 89.78o square feet of the site would consist of landscaping following development. The proposed project would be required to implement storm water pollution control measures pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. In addition, the proposed project will be required to prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)that will indicate the beast management practices that must be followed during grading and development in the event of a chemical and/or fuel spill. The Clean Water Act (CWA) delineates a national permitting system for point discharges known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). NPDES permits typically incorporate specific discharge limitations for point source discharges to ensure that dischargers meet permit conditions and protect State-defined water quality standards. The NPDES framework also regulates stormwater runoff originating from municipal and industrial sources. As part of the permitting process,the paving contractors would be required to adhere to all pertinent Clean Water Act regulations. Prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit,the proposed project must submit and have approved a water quality management plan(WQMP)to the city engineer on a form provided by the City. The WQMP shall identify all best management practices (BMPs)that would be incorporated into the proposed project to control stormwater and non-stormwater pollutants during and after construction and shall be revised as necessary during the life of the proposed project. A copy of the preliminary WQMP has been prepared and in included in the Appendix. The proposed project would not include the installation or operation of any water wells or any groundwater extraction or recharge systems. The proposed project would not include surface or subsurface application or introduction of potential contaminants or waste materials during construction or operation such as septic systems,underground or aboveground storage tanks,percolation ponds,landfills and agricultural activities. The proposed project would not involve or allow an activity or process that would result in a point source discharge to a body of water. Finally,the proposed project would not create conditions which may result in soil erosion,sediment runoff or nonpoint sources of contamination.The proposed project would be required to implement certain best management practices (BMPs) as a means to control storm water runoff and to maintain water quality.These BMPs would comply with both the pertinent NPDES requirements and BMPs in the required WQMP for both construction and once the units are occupied. These BMPs may include, but not be limited to, maintenance of the site, sweeping of streets, preventing sheet flow during heavy rainfall, promptly cleaning fuel spills, and maintaining drainage grates. In addition, Section 19.20.210 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code states the following: "All businesses, regardless of permit status, shall implement all applicable BMPs, as listed in the California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks or the current county municipal stormwater management program, to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff and reduce non- stormwater discharges to the MS4 to the maximum extent practicable.All structural controls and BMPs shall also be maintained to effectively prevent pollutants from contacting stormwater or remove pollutants from stormwater runoff to the maximum extent practicable. Maintenance records for SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE'70 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD structural BMPs and treatment devices, including waste hauling receipts, shall be kept for a period of five years and made available to the city's inspector upon request." Adherence to the aforementioned BMP requirements would be effective e in reducing the potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. B. Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or. interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin?•Less than Significant Impact. The majority of Cucamonga Valley Water District's (CVWD) water comes from imported water. Imported water can range approximately 35-65 percent of the District's water. Sufficient connection capacity exists to meet current and future imported water demands. The District produces groundwater from the two groundwater basins that underlie the District service area: Chino Basin and Cucamonga Basin.In addition to imported water and groundwater, the District has rights to six sources of surface water from the canyons: Cucamonga Canyon,Day/East Canyon,Deer Canyon,Lytle Creek, Smith Canyon Group,and the Golf Course Tunnel. Currently,water is only utilized from three of the six sources: Cucamonga Canyon, Day/East Canyon, and Deer Canyon. As Of 20o6, CVWD maintained 23 groundwater wells, of which 13 were in service with a maximum production capacity Of 20,490 gallons per minute (or an annual production equivalent Of 33,076 acre-feet). A search was conducted through the Regional Water Quality Control Board's on-line database Geotracker to identify the presence of any natural underground water wells within the proposed project site. The search yielded no results.60 In addition,the proposed project will be connected to the City's water lines and will not deplete groundwater supplies or result in a direct decrease in the groundwater supplies.The proposed project will involve the installation of a new 8-inch water line in the new cul-de-sac road that will connect to an existing water located in Arapaho Road. The proposed project does not include the installation of production water wells or a permanent groundwater extraction or dewatering system in a groundwater basin used for potable water supply purposes. The proposed project does not include planned groundwater recharge through surface spreading or injection. The proposed project would not reduce permeable areas overlying a spreading ground used for groundwater recharge. As previously mentioned, the City of Rancho Cucamonga overlies two groundwater basins (Chino and Cucamonga Basins) as identified in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Local groundwater provides approximately 35 percent of the total water supply of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Each groundwater basin is replenished by natural precipitation and through a number of spreading grounds and percolation basins. The proposed project site is currently vacant and covered over in dirt. Upon project completion,the proposed project site would be partially covered over in impervious surfaces (pavement and building surfaces). Although the proposed project would decrease the land area over which water could percolate and recharge groundwater,a great majority of the groundwater recharge occurs through spreading grounds, which includes the Cucamonga Spreading Grounds, Day Creek Spreading Grounds, Etiwanda Spreading Grounds, and the San Sevaine Spreading Grounds. The Etiwanda Creek Spreading Grounds is located approximately 1/2 mile to the northeast of the site and its nearest point. 60 Geotracker GAMA. http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/gamaama/gamamap/public/default.asp. Website accessed January 9,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 71 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Palitical Jurisdicvons General Structures ���r l e l n l n l u-r .'; s• 7� --• Flood Structure - [ j-{ Bridge `t Dam,Weir,Jetty J Other Structure > Flood Hazard Zones ,d S%Annual Chance Flood Hazard Regulatory Flood way J Special Floodway Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard 4 e Q 4.0.2%Annual Chance Flood Haze rd Futu re Conditions T%An n ual Chance Flood f • 1 Hazard �- ut Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee Project Site - f C: L 11WI FL F�® ex �IhdET`Ihd NfEL� 51111171111111111 N 0�~ EXHIBIT 3-6 FLOOD HA7.ARDs MAP SOURCE:FEMA'S NATIONAL FLOOD HA7ARD LAYER(NFHL)VIEWER SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 72 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Furthermore, the proposed five single-family units would connect directly to an existing water line in Arapaho Road. No groundwater well would be required to directly serve the proposed project and no direct groundwater withdrawals would occur. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. C. Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner in which would result in flooding on-or off-site;create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or,impede or redirect flood flows?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes on a site that is currently vacant. Upon project completion,a portion of the proposed project site would be covered over in pervious surfaces (grass,landscaping and the bio retention system). Impervious surfaces would include paved areas such as driveways and building surfaces. Upon project completion, the proposed project site would be properly drained and would not result in erosion or siltation on-or off-site. The proposed project would be restricted to the proposed project site and would not alter the course of any local waterways according to the preliminary WQMP and the Hydrology study. The proposed project would be required to implement storm water pollution control measures pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)requirements. The Applicant would also be required to implement the preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP).The WQMP identifies the Best Management Practices that will be adhered to as a means to control or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP also indicates post-construction best management practices(BMPs)that would be the responsibility of the Applicant to implement over the life of the proposed project. With adherence to the WQMP, the impacts would be less than significant. D. In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?•No Impact. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) map provided in Exhibit 3-6, the proposed project site is not located within a designated Soo-year flood hazard area, as defined by FEMA. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer, the proposed project site is located in Zone X(0.2%) (refer to Exhibit 3-6).61 Zones designated as X(0.2% or a 500-year flood zone)are not considered zones with a significant flood risk. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Hazards Program, seiches are standing waves set up on rivers, reservoirs, ponds, and lakes when seismic waves from an earthquake pass through the area.6z A seiche in the local waterways is not likely to affect the proposed project due to the proposed project site's distance from the local waterways. The nearest local waterway is Etiwanda Creek located approximately 4,400 feet 61 Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA's National Flood Hazard Layer(NFHL)Viewer. Website accessed September 19, 2019. 62 United States Geological Survey Earthquake Hazards Program. Seismic Seiches. hnps://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topies/seiche.php. SECTION •ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE73 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAFAHo ROAD to the northeast of the site. Furthermore,the proposed project site is not located in an area that is subject to inundation from a tsunami because the proposed project site is located 43 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean.63 As a result,no impacts would result. E. Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan?•No Impact. As previously mentioned, the proposed project would be required to implement storm water pollution control measures pursuant to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)requirements. The Clean Water Act (CWA) delineates a national permitting system for point discharges known as the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). NPDES permits typically incorporate specific discharge limitations for point source discharges to ensure that dischargers meet permit conditions and protect State-defined water quality standards. The NPDES framework also regulates stormwater runoff originating from municipal and industrial sources. As part of the permitting process,the paving contractors would be required to adhere to all pertinent Clean Water Act regulations. The Applicant would also be required to implement the preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP).The WQMP identifies the Best Management Practices that will be adhered to as a means to control or reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable. The WQMP also indicates post- construction best management practices (BMPs) that would be the responsibility of the Applicant to implement over the life of the proposed project. As indicated previously, domestic water supply is the responsibility of the CVWD. Local supplies are derived from a number of sources including imported surface water from Northern California, groundwater pumped from local aquifers, and a combination of waters collected from the local mountains. Before,during,and after treatment,CVWD collects and analyzes water samples every four hours on a daily basis. In addition to routine testing performed at the treatment plants, water throughout the distribution system is analyzed weekly for disinfectant residuals and bacteriological content.Thousands of other tests are conducted throughout the year to ensure that the local water meets all federal and state regulations. Because the proposed project site would not require any general plan amendment, the low-density residential use was considers in the formulation of development policy considered in the CVWD's 2o16 UWMP. Compliance with the above-mentioned regulations ensures and the proposed project's conformity with the UWMP,would ensure that there are no impacts with respect to this issue. 3.10.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis indicated that the proposed project would not result in any hydrological,stormwater runoff,or water quality impacts. As a result,no mitigation is required. 63 Google Earth. Website accessed September 19,2019. SECTION •ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE74 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3.11 LAND USE &PLANNING 3.11.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant impact on land use and planning if it results in any of the following: • The physical division of an established community;or, • A significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. 3.11.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project physically divide an established community?•No Impact. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and although it is currently vacant, the surrounding area has previously been modified and graded to accommodate the surrounding residential uses. The proposed project site is currently zoned as VL(Very Low Residential)(refer to Exhibit 3-7). The General Plan Land Use Plan Map indicates that the proposed project site has a land use designation of Residential — Very Low (refer to Exhibit 3-8). The proposed project would not require a zone change or general plan amendment, as the proposed use is permitted within the proposed project site. The proposed project site is immediately surrounded on all four sides by properties that are zoned VL (Very Low Residential)and developed with single-family residential uses. Upon the proposed project's completion,the proposed project site would also feature residential uses. Therefore,the proposed project would not lead to any division of an existing established neighborhood and no impacts would occur. B. Would the project cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy,or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?•No Impact. As previously mentioned,the proposed project site is currently zoned as VL(Very Low Residential) (refer to Exhibit 3-7). The General Plan Land Use Plan Map indicates that the proposed project site has a land use designation of Residential — Very Low (refer to Exhibit 3-8). The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. The proposed project would not require a zone change or general plan amendment, as the proposed use is permitted within the proposed project site. The proposed project site is immediately surrounded on all four sides by properties that are zoned VL(Very Low Residential)and developed with single-family residential uses. Upon project completion, the proposed project site would also feature residential uses. Therefore,the proposed project would be in compliance with the City's zoning code and General Plan. The proposed residential development would be required conform to all applicable land use plans,policies and regulations,including the City's zoning code and General Plan. As a result,no impacts would result from the proposed project's implementation. SECTION •ENVIRONMENTALANALYSIs PAGE75 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Legend c Very Low Residential(VL) P a Estate Residential(ER) ` School(S) y c open Space(D5) &aa3a Park(P) Low Residential(L) ` Medium Residential(M) 13 Project5ite FOothfll Fwy 210 a ' Er ,5. A i i f NQ O� EXHIBIT 3-7 ZONING MAP SOURCE:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 76 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Legend __z3id5t Project Site Residential-Medium F7 Residential-Low Medium F7 Residential-Low F7 Residential-Very Low Flood Control/Utility COrrid01 Ban anst Conservation - Schools - Parks Wmdstar Dr G Cassia St Vinta a Dr Ara aho Rd a SR-zro SR-vo C Ptnne S AL � �_ i hland ASe ,�0 Camesi Dr W Kalmia St d 6 ' cl EXHIBIT 3-8 GENERAL PLAN MAP SOURCE:CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE']'] CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD 3.11.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis determined that no significant impacts on land use and planning would result from the implementation of the proposed project. As a result,no mitigation measures would be required. 3.12 MINERAL RESOURCES 3.12.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on mineral resources if it results in any of the following: • The loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State;or, • The loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan. 3.12.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?•No Impact. The Surface Mining and Reclamation Act of 1975 (SMARA) mandates the classification of valuable lands that are subject to urban expansion or other irreversible actions in order to protect mineral resources in the State. SMARA also allows the State to designate lands containing mineral deposits of regional or statewide significance. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has identified a number of areas as significant aggregate resources throughout the City and Sphere of Influence. There are four coalescing alluvial fans in or near the City, comprising a significant local sand and gravel resource. From west to east these alluvial fans are known as the San Antonio, Cucamonga, Deer Creek, and Day Creek fans. The Sphere of Influence currently contains a rock crushing plant located within the Day Creek area,which is the only active aggregate operation in the City/Sphere of Influence.According to the Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources map within the General Plan, the proposed project site is not located in an area with active mineral extraction activities. According to the California Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR)Well Finder,there are no existing or former oil wells and/or oil extraction activities located within the proposed project site.64 The nearest recorded wells to the proposed project site are located over 2.50 miles away from the proposed project site and are inactive wells that are either idle or plugged. As a result, no impacts on existing mineral resources would result from the proposed project's implementation. 64 California Department of Conservation. Division of Oil,Gas&Geothermal Resources Well Finder. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/index.html#close. Website accessed January 18,2019. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 78 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD B. Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan?•No Impact. As previously mentioned,no mineral,oil,or energy extraction and/or generation activities are located within the proposed project site. As a result,the proposed project would not interfere with any resource extraction activity. Therefore,no impacts would result from the implementation of the proposed project. 3.12.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis indicated that no impacts to mineral resources would result from the proposed project's approval and subsequent implementation. As a result,no mitigation measures are required. 3.13 NOISE 3.13.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant impact on the environment if it results in any of the following: • The generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the proposed project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable standards of other agencies; • The generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or, • The exposure of people residing or working in the proposed project area to excessive noise levels for a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport. 3.13.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? • Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Noise levels may be described using a number of methods designed to evaluate the"loudness"of a particular noise. The most commonly used unit for measuring the level of sound is the decibel(dB). Zero on the decibel scale represents the lowest limit of sound that can be heard by humans. The eardrum may rupture at 140 dB.65 Examples of low daytime levels are isolated, natural settings with noise levels as low as 20 dBA and quiet suburban residential streets with noise levels around 4o dBA. Noise levels above 45 dBA at night can 65 USEPA,Protective Noise Levels.1971. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE'79 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD disrupt sleep. Examples of moderate level noise environments are urban residential or semi-commercial areas (typically 55-6o dBA) and commercial locations (typically 6o dBA). People may consider louder environments adverse, but most will accept the higher levels associated with noisier urban residential or residential commercial areas (6o-75 dBA) or dense urban or industrial areas (65-8o dBA). Noise levels that are associated with common,everyday activities are illustrated in Exhibit 3-9• As previously mentioned,residential uses are located on all sides of the proposed project;therefore,noise- sensitive uses are located on all sides of the proposed project site. The nearest homes abut the project site approximately 55 feet from the west property line.These nearby sensitive receptors are shown in Exhibit 3- 2 within the Air Quality section(Section 3.3)• During construction,the proposed project may result in a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the absence of mitigation. Noise levels associated with various types of construction equipment are illustrated in Exhibit 3-1o. The noise levels that are indicated in the exhibit illustrate the typical noise levels at a distance Of 50 feet from the noise source. Composite construction noise is best characterized by Bolt, Beranek, and Newman.66 In this study, the noisiest phases of construction is presented as 89 dBA as measured at a distance Of 50 feet from the construction effort. Noise from stationary or point sources is reduced by about 6 dBA for every doubling of distance. In addition,noise levels are also generally reduced by 1 dBA for each i,000 feet of distance due to air absorption. Noise levels may also be reduced by intervening structures — generally, a single row of buildings between the receptor and the noise source reduces the noise level by about 5 dBA,while a solid wall or berm reduces noise levels by 5 to io dBA. The normal noise attenuation within residential structures with open windows is about 17 dBA,while the noise attenuation with closed windows is about 25 dBA. The ambient noise environment in the vicinity of the proposed project is dominated by noise emanating from vehicles traveling on the nearby roadways and noise typically associated with the adjacent uses,which are residential uses. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. Future sources of noise generated on-site would include noise typically associated with residential uses. Construction of the proposed project would require the use of equipment for site clearing, grading, the installation of utilities, and building construction. During each construction phase, there would be a different mix of equipment operating and noise levels would vary based on the amount of equipment in operation and the location of each activity. The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)has compiled data regarding the noise generating characteristics of specific types of construction equipment and typical construction activities. It is important to note that construction noise levels would diminish rapidly with distance from the construction site at a rate of approximately 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, glass windows are capable of reducing noise by about 25 dBA. 66 Bugharello,et.al. The Impact of Noise Pollution,1975• SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 8o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Noise Levels—in dBA 7V Serious Injury it sonic boom Pain jet take off at 200 ft. 115 music in night club interior 110 motorcycle at 20ft. 105 power mower 100 Discomfort 95 freight train at 50 ft. O food blender 85 electric mixer, light rail train horn 80 75 O portable fan,roadway traffic at 50 ft. 65 6o dishwasher,air conditioner Range of 55 Typical 50 normal conversation Noise 45 refrigerator, light traffic at iooft. Levels 40 35 library interior(quiet study area) 30 25 20 15 Threshold of 10 rustling leaves Hearing 5 o EXHIBIT 3-9 TYPICAL NOISE SOURCES AND LOUDNESS SCALE Source:Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning SECTION 3•1'NVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 81 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Noise Levels —in dBA 6o 70 80 90 100 Compactors (Rollers) Front Loaders Backhoes 0 � � o ar f� Tractors Scrapers, Graders WPavers Trucks ov o Concrete Mixers Wi W Concrete Pumps Cranes(Movable) Cranes(Derrick) • Pumps rq W Generators Compressors Impact Pneumatic Wrenches Equipment Jack Hammers Pile Drivers Other Vibrators Equipment Saws EXHIBIT 3-10 TYPICAL CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Source:Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning SECTION 3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 82 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 The proposed project's construction noise levels would occur on a temporary and intermittent basis during the construction period. Pursuant to the City's Municipal Code,construction activities within a residential area are prohibited between the hours of 8:0o PM and 7:0o AM Monday through Saturday. Construction noise is prohibited on Sundays and national holidays. The proposed project's construction would comply with these requirements. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code has established the following noise control standards for residential zones:67 • Residential noise standards. • The following table includes the maximum noise limits in residential zones. These are the noise limits when measured at the adjacent residential property line (exterior) or within a neighboring home(interior). Table 3-6 Residential Noise Limits Location of Maximum Allowable Measurement 1o:oo p.m.to 7:oo a.m. 7.oo a.m.to 1 oo p.m. Exterior 6o dBA 65 dBA Interior 45 dBA 5o dBA • Special exclusions. The following activities shall be exempted from the provisions of this section: • Noise sources associated with, or vibration created by, construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys,provided said activities: • When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church or similar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:0o p.m. and 7:0o a.m. on weekdays,including Saturday,or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday,and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line. • Noise sources associated with the maintenance of real property, provided said activities take place between the hours Of 7:0o a.m.and 8:0o p.m.on any day. In order to ensure that the neighboring residential uses are shielded from construction noise,the following mitigation measures are required: • Temporary noise barriers must be erected along the site's boundaries. These sound barriers would be designed to attenuate construction noise. We recommend plywood fencing or other sound attenuating materials like sound curtains(sound barriers can mitigate construction noise by 20-25 dBA). 67 Rancho Cucamonga,City of. Municipal Code,Title 17 Development Code,Article.V Site Development Provisions,Chapter 17.66 Performance Standards,Section 17.66.o5o Noise Standards. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 83 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 • Demolition and construction activities shall be scheduled to the extent reasonably feasible so as to avoid operating several pieces of high noise generating equipment simultaneously. • The project contractors must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the east side of the project site and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint, the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise to meet Municipal Code requirements. In addition, all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City's Public Works Department. • The project contractors shall use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression equipment as a means to reduce machinery noise. The implementation of the above-mentioned mitigation measures would reduce potential construction noise impacts to levels that are less than significant. The proposed project would increase traffic volumes on the surrounding roadways,which in turn has the potential to increase roadway(traffic-related)noise. It typically requires a doubling of traffic volumes to result in an increase in the ambient noise levels of between 3.0 to 5.o dBA. The 3.0 to 5.o dBA figures are considered to be the limit where changes in the noise levels may be perceived by persons with normal hearing. According to the traffic analysis prepared for the proposed project, the proposed development would result in approximately 5o net daily vehicle trips, including 5 PM peak hour trips. The generation of 5o additional vehicle trips would not represent a doubling of traffic volumes along Arapaho Road. As a result, the proposed project's traffic noise impact would be less than significant. B. Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?•Less than Significant Impact. The nearest land uses that may potentially be impacted by groundborne vibration and noise(primarily from the use of heavy construction equipment) are the residential uses that surround all sides of the proposed project site. Once operational, the proposed project's noise impacts would be similar to those that are already exist among the existing residential uses and would not be significant. As previously mentioned, the noisiest phases of construction are anticipated to be 89 dBA as measured at a distance Of 50 feet from the construction activity. As stated within the City's Municipal Code, construction activities within a residential area are prohibited between the hours of 8:oo PM and 7:00 AM Monday through Saturday. Construction noise is prohibited on Sundays and national holidays.68 Compliance with City noise standards will decrease any potential adverse impacts to nearby sensitive receptors. Four mitigation measures were listed in the previous subsection(3.13.2.A)to ensure that the residential uses are shielded from construction noise. 68 Rancho Cucamonga,City of. Municipal Code,Title 17 Development Code,Article IV Site Development Provisions,Chapter 17.66 Performance Standards,Section 17.66.o5o Noise Standards. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 84 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Ground vibrations associated with construction activities using modern construction methods and equipment rarely reach the levels that result in damage to nearby buildings though vibration related to construction activities may be discernible in areas located near the construction site. A possible exception is in older buildings where special care must be taken to avoid damage. Table 3-7 summarizes the levels of vibration and the usual effect on people and buildings. The U.S.Department of Transportation(U.S.DOT) has guidelines for vibration levels from construction related to their activities and recommends that the maximum peak-particle-velocity levels remain below 0.05 inches per second at the nearest structures. Vibration levels above 0.5 inches per second have the potential to cause architectural damage to normal dwellings. The U.S. DOT also states that vibration levels above 0.015 inches per second (in/sec) are sometimes perceptible to people, and the level at which vibration becomes an irritation to people is o.64 inches per second. Table 3-7 Common Effects of Construction Vibration Peak Particle Effects on Humans Effects on Buildings Velocity(in/sec) <0.005 Imperceptible No effect on buildings 0.005 to 0.015 Barely perceptible No effect on buildings 0.02 to 0.05 Level at which continuous vibrations begin to annoy No effect on buildings occupants of nearby buildings o.l to 0.5 Vibrations considered unacceptable for persons Minimal potential for damage to weak or sensitive exposed to continuous or long-term vibration. structures Vibrations considered bothersome by most people, Threshold at which there is a risk of architectural 0.5 to 1.0 however tolerable if short-term in length damage to buildings with plastered ceilings and walls.Some risk to ancient monuments and ruins. U.S.Bureau of Mines data indicates that blasting 1.0 to 2.0 Vibrations considered unpleasant by most people. vibration in this range will not harm most buildings.Most construction vibration limits are in this range. >3.o Vibration is unpleasant Potential for architectural damage and possible minor structural damage Source:U.S.Department of Transportation Typical levels from vibration generally do not have the potential for any structural damage if properly used. Some construction activities, such as pile driving and blasting, can produce vibration levels that may have the potential to damage some vibration sensitive structures if performed within 50 to too feet of the structure. Various types of construction equipment have been measured under a wide variety of construction activities with an average of source levels reported in terms of velocity levels as shown in Table 3-8. Although the table gives one level for each piece of equipment, it should be noted that there is a considerable variation in reported ground vibration levels from construction activities. The data in Table 3-10 provides vibration levels for several pieces of construction equipment. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 85 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 3-8 Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Construction Equipment PPV Qa 25 ft. Noise Levels (inches/sec.) (VdB)Qa 25 ft. Pile Driver(impact) Upper range 1.58 112 Typical o.644 104 Pile Drive(Sonic) Upper range 0.734 105 Typical 0.170 93 Clam Shovel Drop 0.202 94 Large Bulldozer** o.o89 87 Caisson Drilling o.o89 87 Loaded Trucks** 0.076 86 Small Bulldozer** 0.035 79 Note:**Equipment likely to be used in construction Source:Noise and Vibration During Construction Based on Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment (FTA, May 2oo6), a vibration level of 102 VdB (velocity in decibels 0.5 inches per second[iii/sec])or higher(FTA,May 20o6)is considered safe and would not result in any construction vibration damage. At a distance of 6o feet, the on-site pile driving would generate a vibration level of up to 0.25 in/sec. However,no pile driving equipment will be used during the proposed project's construction. Therefore,the proposed project would not generate significant vibration impacts.The proposed project would result in a temporary increase in ambient noise and vibration levels during the project's construction phase. The vibrations would range from 79 to 94 VdB at 25 feet from the activity location. As indicated previously, the noise/vibration will decrease with distance and at no time will the noise levels be over iio VdB that which could cause minor damage. As a result,the potential impact would be less than significant. C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?•No Impact. The proposed project site is not located within two miles of a public airport or a public use airport. The nearest public airport to the project site is the Ontario International Airport,which is located 6.45 miles southwest of the project site.69 The project site is located outside of a ALCUP noise contour from Ontario Airport.As a result,the proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels and no impacts would occur. 3.13.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of potential impacts related to noise indicated that the residential uses located adjacent to the project site could potentially be impacted by construction noise. To ensure that the residential uses are 69 Toll-Free Airline.Los Angeles County Public and Private Airports,California. http://www.tollfreeairline.com/california/losangeles.htm. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 86 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 shielded from construction noise,the following mitigation measures are required: Mitigation Measure No. 9 (Noise). Temporary noise barriers must be erected along the site's boundaries. These sound barriers will be designed to attenuate construction noise. We recommend plywood fencing or other sound attenuating materials like sound curtains(sound barriers can mitigate construction noise by 20-25 dBA). Mitigation Measure No. io (Noise). Demolition and construction activities shall be scheduled to the extent reasonably feasible so as to avoid operating several pieces of high noise generating equipment simultaneously. Mitigation Measure No.11(Noise). The project contractors must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the east side of the proposed project site and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint,the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise to meet Municipal Code requirements. In addition,all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City's Public Works Department. Mitigation Measure No. 12 (Noise). The project contractors shall use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression equipment as a means to reduce machinery noise. 3.14 POPULATION&HOUSING 3.14.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant impact on housing and population if it results in any of the following: • A substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure);or, • The displacement of substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. 3.14.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly(for example,by proposing new homes and businesses)or indirectly(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?•Less than Significant Impact. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 87 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. Growth-inducing impacts are generally associated with the provision of urban services to an undeveloped or rural area. Growth- inducing impacts include the following: • New development in an area presently undeveloped and economic factors which may influence development. Although the proposed project site is not currently developed,the proposed project site is surrounded on all sides by development. • Extension of roadways and other transportation facilities. The proposed project site is well served by existing public roadways. No new public roadways would need to be constructed to serve the proposed project. The existing Arapaho Road would be extended onto the project site and this roadway will end as a cul-de-sac. • Extension of infrastructure and other improvements. The proposed project site would be served by existing water and power infrastructure though these existing lines will be extended into the site to serve the individual units. • Major off-site public projects (treatment plants, etc.). No new off-site public projects would be required to accommodate the proposed project. • The removal of housing requiring replacement housing elsewhere. No housing units are located within the proposed project site boundaries. As a result, no replacement housing would be required. • Additional population growth leading to increased demand for goods and services. The proposed project is an infill project that would provide an additional five single-family units. • Short-term growth-inducing impacts related to the project's construction. Construction workers and deliveries will not be required to travel long distances to reach the construction site. According to the Growth Forecast Appendix prepared by SCAG for the 2016-204o Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy(RTP/SCS), the City of Rancho Cucamonga had a population of 170,100 in 2012 and is projected to have a population Of 204,30o by the year 2040.70 As Of July 1, 2018, the population in the City of Rancho Cucamonga was estimated to be 177,751.71 According to the U.S.Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household(2013- 2017);therefore,the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. The proposed number of new residents that the proposed project would introduce will not surpass those projected by SCAG. The project will be consistent with the City's General Plan designation which was used in the formulation of the SCAG growth projections. 70 Southern California Association of Governments. Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy 2oi6-2040. Demographics&Growth Forecast. April 2016. n United States Census Bureau. Quickfacts,Rancho Cucamonga City,California. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/ranchocucamongacibLcalifomia. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 88 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 The site on which the proposed residential development would be constructed is presently vacant and covered over in dirt. The proposed project site is located in a fully urbanized area of Rancho Cucamonga. The proposed project would be classified as an infill project. The California Code, Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 21o9g defines an infill site as "a lot located within an urban area that has been previously developed, or on a vacant site where at least 75 percent of the perimeter of the site adjoins or is separated only by an improved public right-of-way from,parcels that are developed with qualified urban uses." The proposed project site is completely surrounded by urban uses. The proposed project would not be located in an area that is currently undeveloped or unserved by major infrastructure. As a result, less than significant impacts would occur. B. Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing,necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?•No Impact. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and the proposed project area has previously been heavily modified and graded to accommodate the surrounding residential uses. The proposed project site is currently underutilized and covered over in dirt. There are no housing units located within the proposed project site boundaries. Therefore, no residents or housing units would be displaced as a result of the proposed project's implementation and no impacts would occur. 3.14.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of potential population and housing impacts indicated that no significant impacts would result from the proposed project. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.15 PUBLIC SERVICES 3.15.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on public services if it results in any of the following: • Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for fire protection; • Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for police protection; SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 89 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 • Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for schools; • Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for parks;or, • Substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for other public facilities. 3.15.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for fire protection?•Less than Significant Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) serves the combined 50-square-mile Rancho Cucamonga City and Sphere of Influence area. The RCFPD has trained many of its members and has equipment to deal with different types of emergencies. These include: • Wildland Fire Protection:Firefighters specialize in mitigating fires in the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI)areas. • Emergency Medical Services(EMS): Firefighters trained as Paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians are responsible for providing rapid response and assessment of life in threatening situations that result from injury or illness. • Technical Rescue:The Technical Rescue team is a specialized team that is trained in confined space rescue,trench rescue,building collapse and shoring,swift water rescue,high angle rope rescue,and large animal rescue. • Hazardous Material: The Hazardous Materials team is a specialized team that is trained and certified to take corrective action to prevent or contain the spread of hazardous materials from spills,explosion,or fire.72 72 Rancho Cucamonga,City of. General Plan. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 90 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 3-9 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD) Fire Stations Fire Station Name Address Distance from Project Site Fire Station 171 Amethyst Fire Station 6627 Amethyst Avenue 4.62 miles to the west Fire Station 172 San Bernardino Road Fire Station 9612 San Bernardino Road 4.93 miles to the southwest Fire Station 173 Day Creek Fire Station 1227o Fire House Court 1.50 miles to the southwest Fire Station 174 Jersey Fire Station 11297 Jersey Avenue 3.8o miles to the southwest Fire Station 175 Banyan Fire Station 111o8 Banyan Street 2.57 miles to the northwest Fire Station 176 East Avenue Fire Station 584o East Avenue o.62 miles to the north Fire Station 177 Hellman Fire Station 927o Rancho Street 5.04 miles to the northwest Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga,Fire District The nearest fire station to the proposed project site is the East Avenue Station,located o.62 miles north of the proposed project site. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. New development projects in the City may increase the demand for fire protection and emergency medical services. The proposed project is not located within a brush fire hazard area, hillside, or area with inadequate fire hydrant service or street access. The proposed project would be residential in nature and would not involve the use, manufacture or storage of toxic, readily combustible, or otherwise hazardous materials. The proposed project's location would provide for adequate RCFPD access. Arapaho Road has a width of approximately 30 feet,which would provide sufficient clearance for the fire trucks. In addition, the proposed project is an infill project and will not result in an expansion of the fire service boundaries. The proposed project would work with RCFPD and incorporate RCFPD's recommendations relative to fire safety into the building plans. The RCFPD currently reviews all new development plans, and future development would be required to conform to all fire protection and prevention requirements, including emergency access. The proposed project would only place an incremental demand on fire services since the proposed project would involve the operation of five single-family homes. Compliance with the above- mentioned requirement,as well as the pertinent codes and ordinances,would reduce the impacts to levels that are less than significant. Thus,the proposed project would not result in the need for or provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities the construction of which could cause significant adverse environmental impacts,and fire services impacts would be less than significant. B. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for police protection?•Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. Rancho Cucamonga contracts with the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department (SBCSD) for police services. The SBCSD operates the Police Department and provides response services,criminal investigation services,traffic enforcement,and preventive patrol with the main police facility located at the City's Civic Center. There is also a sub-station located within the Victoria Gardens Shopping Center and one satellite office located at Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road. In addition,the proposed project is an infill project and will not result in an expansion of the fire service boundaries. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 91 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 3-io San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department(SBCSD) Police Stations in Rancho Cucamonga Police Station Address Distance from Project Site Police Department(main facility) 10510 Civic Center Drive(City Hall) 4.o8 miles to the southwest Victoria Gardens Satellite Station 7743 Kew Avenue 1.95 miles to the south Satellite Office Vineyard Avenue and Base Line Road 5.50 miles to the west Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga,Police Department Construction sites, if left unsecured, have the potential to attract trespassers and/or vandals that would potentially result in graffiti,excess trash,and potentially unsafe conditions for the public. Such occurrences would adversely affect the aesthetic character of the proposed project site and surrounding area and could potentially cause public health and safety concerns. The proposed project would incorporate temporary construction fencing along the periphery of the active construction areas to screen as much of the construction activity from view at the local street level and to keep unauthorized persons from entering the construction area. With implementation of the following mitigation measures, the proposed project's impacts upon SBCSD services would be less than significant: • Temporary construction fencing shall be placed along the periphery of the active construction areas to screen as much of the construction activity from view at the local street level and to keep unpermitted persons from entering the construction area. The proposed project would only place an incremental demand on police protection services since the proposed project is not anticipated to be an attractor for crime due to the lack of unsecure vacant space. To ensure the proposed project elements adhere to the City's security requirements, the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department would review the site plan for the proposed project to ensure that the development adheres to the Department requirements, including, but not limited to, photometric plan review. Adherence to the above-mentioned requirement and mitigation measure would reduce the potential impacts to levels that are less than significant. C. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for schools? • Less than Significant Impact. Four elementary school districts and one high school district serve residents of Rancho Cucamonga. Rancho Cucamonga is located entirely within the Chaffey Joint Union High School District,which provides all secondary public education. The district operates four high schools: Alta Loma on the west, Rancho Cucamonga in the central area,Etiwanda on the east,and Los Osos in the north central portion of the City. Primary-level public education services are provided by four elementary and junior high/middle school districts: Alta Loma serving the northwest portion, Central serving the west central portion, Cucamonga serving the south portion,and Etiwanda serving the eastern portion of the City. The unincorporated Sphere of Influence to the north is served by the Alta Loma and Etiwanda districts. The City also has many religious institutions on large properties that have K-12 schools now and possibly in the future. Chaffey Community SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 92 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 College serves the Rancho Cucamonga community and surrounding region. Chaffey Community College is a full-service community college occupying a 2oo-acre site along north Haven Avenue. The college offers a wide range of educational programs, including the following schools: Business and Applied Technology; Health Sciences; Language Arts; Mathematics and Science; Social and Behavioral Sciences; and Visual, Performing,and Communication Arts. In addition to Chaffey Community College,Rancho Cucamonga can boast a number of satellite campuses from major institutions of higher learning. Within the City limits these include facilities operated by the University of Redlands and the University of La Verne. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household (2013-2017); therefore, the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. According to U.S.Census Bureau statistics for the City, 17.7% of residents are children of school age;therefore, approximately 3 of the new residents would be of school age. Therefore,the projected number of new students would not increase demand for school services. The proposed project would not require construction of new facilities,a major reorganization of students or classrooms, major revisions to the school calendar (such as year-round sessions), or other actions which would create a temporary or permanent impact on the nearby schools. The Applicant would be required to pay all applicable developer fees to the local school districts to offset the proposed project's impact on local schools. The Applicant would be required to pay all applicable school facility development fees in accordance with California Government Code Section 65995• Pursuant to Government Code Section 65995,payment of development fees authorized by SB 5o are deemed to be"full and complete school facilities mitigation." The District will be able to accommodate the project's potential enrollments.With the payment of a School Development Fee,the proposed project's potential impact upon public school services would be less than significant. D. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios,response times,or other performance objectives for parks?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household(2013- 2017);therefore,the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. The nearest park to the proposed project site is Etiwanda Creek Park,which is located 0.40 miles north of the proposed project site. The proposed project would not require construction of new park facilities or other actions which would create a temporary or permanent impact on the nearby parks. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project would result in the need for or provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities the construction of which could cause significant adverse environmental impacts. The proposed project would be required to comply with any applicable regulations requiring the payment of parks fees or the dedication of parkland. Each residential related project would also be required to pay applicable park fees and comply with the on-site open space requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 93 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Municipal Code,which would offset demand for public parks. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. E. Would the project result insubstantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for other public facilities?•Less than Significant Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library has two library facilities. The Archibald Library was the first municipal library in Rancho Cucamonga,which opened in 1994• The Paul A.Biane Library,located as part of the Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, opened in 20o6. The opening of this second facility has nearly doubled the capacity of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library system. The Rancho Cucamonga Public Library offers programs and services for people of all ages,including a bookmobile,technology classes,story time for children, programs for teens, book clubs, literacy programs, and other special programs. Two libraries outside of the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library system are also located within the City. These libraries include the Chaffey College Library and the Law Library for San Bernardino County. A significant impact may occur if a project includes substantial employment or population growth that could generate a demand for other public facilities(such as libraries),which would exceed the capacity available to serve the proposed project site and require the construction of additional library facilities that would create direct or indirect environmental impacts. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household(2013- 2017);therefore,the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. The new residents would likely use the aforementioned library branches. The proposed project is unlikely to create substantial capacity or service level problems that would require or result in new or expanded public facilities the construction of which would have a significant adverse impact. Thus,impacts would be less than significant. 3.15.3 MITIGATION MEASURES With implementation of the following mitigation measure, the proposed project's impacts upon LAPD services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure No. 13 (Public Services). Temporary construction fencing shall be placed along the periphery of the active construction areas to screen as much of the construction activity from view at the local street level and to keep unpermitted persons from entering the construction area. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 3.16 RECREATION 3.16.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on the environment if it results in any of the following: • An increase in the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated;or, • The inclusion of recreational facilities or the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. 3.16.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?• Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. According to the U.S. Census Bureau,the average household size in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 3.07 persons per household(2013- 2017);therefore,the potential number of new residents that would be introduced by the proposed project would be 15 persons. A significant impact would occur if the proposed project would result in a substantial physical deterioration of a park facility. The nearest park to the proposed project site is Etiwanda Creek Park, which is located 0.40 miles north of the proposed project site. The proposed project would not require construction of new park facilities or other actions which would create a temporary or permanent impact on the nearby parks. The proposed project would comply with any applicable regulations requiring the payment of parks fees or the dedication of parkland. Each residential related project in the City is required to pay applicable park fees and to comply with the on-site open space requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, which would offset demand for public parks. Section 3.68.030 (Establishment and administration of Park In-Lieu/Park Impact Fees)of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides the justification for collecting park fees from new residential development. The total fees per unit would be$10,474 and would include a subdivision fee($5,756 per unit),a park improvement fee($2,805 per unit)and a community and recreation center fee($1,913 per unit).The five units would be required to pay$52,370. With the payment of these fees,the impacts would be less than significant. B. Would the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?•Less than Significant Impact. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 95 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 A significant impact may occur if a project includes or requires the construction or expansion of park facilities and such construction would have a significant adverse effect on the environment. The proposed project itself does not include the expansion of park facilities and does not require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse impact on the environment. In addition,the proposed project would be required to comply with any applicable regulations requiring the payment of parks fees or the dedication of parkland. Each residential related project would also be required to pay applicable park fees and comply with the on-site open space requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code,which would offset demand for public parks. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. 3.16.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis determined that the proposed project would not result in any significant impact on recreational facilities and services. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.17 TRANSPORTATION 3.17.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga,acting as Lead Agency,a project may have a significant adverse impact on traffic and circulation if it results in any of the following: • A conflict with a plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway,bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • A conflict or inconsistency with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.3 subdivision(b); • A substantial increase in hazards due to a geometric design feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment); or, • Inadequate emergency access. 3.17.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project conflict with a plan,ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit,roadway,bicycle and pedestrian facilities?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. In order to accurately assess future traffic conditions with the proposed project, trip generation estimates were developed for the proposed project. Trip generation rates for the proposed project are based on the nationally recognized recommendations contained in "Trip Generation" Manual, loth edition, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE). Table 3-11 shows a summary of trip generation estimates for the proposed project. As shown in Table 3-13,the proposed project is anticipated to generate approximately 50 trips per day,with five of those trips occurring during the evening peak hour. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 96 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 3-11 Trip Generation Estimates ITE PM Peak ITE Land Use/Project Scenario Code& Unit Daily Hour Unit Total Single-Family Detached Housing 210 Dwelling Units 10.00 1.00 Total 5 Units 50 5 Source:ITE Trip Generation Manual,loth Edition The number of trips that would be added will not create a significant impact to surrounding roadways and would not impact any street or intersection level of service(LOS). Therefore,the proposed project would not conflict with a plan,ordinance,or policy addressing the circulation system,including transit,roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. As a result,the potential impacts would be less than significant. B. Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.3 subdivision(b)? •Less than Significant Impact. According to CEQA Guidelines §15o64.3 subdivision (b)(1), vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. Generally,projects within one-half mile of either an existing major transit stop or a stop along an existing high quality transit corridor should be presumed to cause a less than significant transportation impact. Projects that decrease VMT in the proposed project area compared to existing conditions should be considered to have a less than significant transportation impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes on an infill property that is currently vacant. The proposed project's implementation would have less than significant impacts since the proposed infill project will recycle existing undeveloped or underutilized properties located in established urban areas. It is important to note that the proposed project is an"infill"development,which is seen as an important strategy in combating the release of GHG emissions. Infill development provides a regional benefit in terms of a reduction in VMT since the project is consistent with the regional and State sustainable growth objectives identified in the State's Strategic Growth Council(SGC).73 Infill development reduces VMT by recycling existing undeveloped or underutilized properties located in established urban areas. When development is located in a more rural setting, such as further east in the desert areas, employees, patrons, visitors, and residents may have to travel farther since rural development is often located a significant distance from employment, entertainment, and population centers. Consequently, this distance is reduced when development is located in urban areas since employment,entertainment,and population centers tend to be set in more established communities. As a result,the potential impacts would be less than significant. C. Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature(e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)?•No Impact. 73 California Strategic Growth Council. hap: /www.sgc.mgov/Initiatives/infill-development.html. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 97 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Vehicular access to the proposed project site would be provided by an extension of Arapaho Road which would end in a cul-de-sac.Access to each of the five new single-family homes would be provided by driveway connections with Arapaho Road. Approximately 50 vehicle trips would occur at the proposed project site every day and five vehicle trips would occur during the PM peak hour. This low volume of traffic is not expected to cause any street delays or long queues. The proposed project would be located in an area that is not readily accessible from a major arterial road. Therefore,the street that leads to the proposed project (Arapaho Road)would not handle a significantly larger amount of traffic.The existing public streets would remain unchanged and no modifications resulting in an increased hazard would be made to the existing street system. The proposed project would not expose future residents to dangerous intersections or sharp curves and the proposed project will not introduce incompatible equipment or vehicles to the adjacent roads. As a result,no impacts would occur. D. Would the project result in inadequate emergency access?•No Impact. The proposed project would not impede emergency access to any neighboring properties. Vehicular access to the proposed project site would be provided by an extension of Arapaho Road which would end in a cul- de-sac.Access to each of the five new single-family homes would be provided by driveway connections with Arapaho Road. All construction staging areas would be located within the proposed project site and at no time will any of the surrounding streets be completely closed to traffic. At no time would any local streets or parcels be closed to traffic. The design of the new street extension and cul-de-sac will be reviewed by the Fire Department to ensure it meets all pertinent requirements. As a result, the proposed project's implementation would not result in any impacts. 3.17.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis determined that no significant traffic and circulation impacts would result from the proposed project's implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.18 TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES 3.1$.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on tribal cultural resources if it results in any of the following: • A substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k);or, • A substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 98 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe,and that is a resource determined by the Lead Agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. 3.18.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21 o74 as either a site,feature,place,cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources,or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)?•Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation. A Tribal Resource is defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 and includes the following: • Sites, features, places, cultural landscapes, sacred places, and objects with cultural value to a California Native American tribe that are either of the following: included or determined to be eligible for inclusion in the California Register of Historical Resources or included in a local register of historical resources as defined in subdivision(k)of Section 5020.1. • A resource determined by the lead agency,in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision(c)of Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Section 5024.1 for the purposes of this paragraph, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. • A cultural landscape that meets the criteria of subdivision (a) is a tribal cultural resource to the extent that the landscape is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape. • A historical resource described in Section 21084.1, a unique archaeological resource as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 21o83.2, or a "non-unique archaeological resource" as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 21o83.2 may also be a tribal cultural resource if it conforms with the criteria of subdivision(a). Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52) established a formal consultation process for California Native American Tribes to identify potential significant impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources, as defined in Public Resources Code §21074,as part of CEQA. As specified in AB 52,lead agencies must provide notice inviting consultation to California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project if the Tribe has submitted a request in writing to be notified of proposed projects. The Tribe must respond in writing within 3o days of the City's AB-52 notice. The Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)provided a list of Native American groups and individuals who might have knowledge of the religious and/or cultural significance of resources that may be in and near the proposed project site. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 99 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 While there are currently no recorded archaeological sites within the proposed project site area, buried resources could potentially be unearthed during construction activities. As a result,mitigation is required. Title 14; Chapter 3; Article 5; Section 15o64.5 of CEQA would apply in terms of the identification of significant archaeological resources and their salvage. Adherence to the above-mentioned mitigation would reduce potential impacts to levels that would be less than significant. B. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21 o74 as either a site,feature,place,cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,sacred place,or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe,and that is a resource determined by the Lead Agency,in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence,to be significant pursuant to criteria setforth in subdivision(c)of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1? In applying the criteria setforth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the Lead Agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. •Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project site is located within an urbanized area of the City that has been disturbed due to past development and there is a limited likelihood that artifacts would be encountered. The proposed project's construction would involve shallow excavation for the installation of the bio retention system, building footings, utility lines, and other underground infrastructure. Ground disturbance would involve grading and earth-clearing activities for the installation of the grass and landscaping and other on-site improvements. In addition, the proposed project area is not located within an area that is typically associated with habitation sites,foraging areas,ceremonial sites,or burials. Nevertheless,mitigation was provided in the previous subsection. With the implementation of this mitigation measure,tribal cultural impacts would be reduced to levels that would be less than significant. 3.18.3 MITIGATION MEASURES Although parts of the proposed project site have been subject to disturbance to accommodate the existing structures,the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance.As a result,the following mitigation is required to address the potential impacts on tribal/cultural resources: Mitigation Measure No. 14 (Tribal Cultural Resources). The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include,but are not limited to,pavement removal,pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 100 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Mitigation Measure No. lg (Tribal Cultural Resources). Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed.All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources.Typically,the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and,if necessary,mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Section15o64.5 [f])for historical resources. Mitigation Measure No. 16 (Tribal Cultural Resources). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a"historical resource"or "unique archaeological resource",time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available.The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f)for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e., avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material.If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.17(Tribal Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Public Resources Code Sections 21o83.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.18(Tribal Cultural Resources).Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 101 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Mitigation Measure No. 19 (Tribal Cultural Resources). Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American,the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Mitigation Measure No. 20(Tribal Cultural Resources). If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation is designated MLD,the following treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe, the term"human remains"encompasses more than human bones.In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains.These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects that,as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture,are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Mitigation Measure No.21(Tribal Cultural Resources).Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day,the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours.The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted,it may be determined that burials will be removed.The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully,ethically and respectfully.If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material.If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC.The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags.All human remains,funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity.There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 102 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 3.19 UTILITIES &SERVICE SYSTEMS 3.19.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact on utilities if it results in any of the following: • The requirement or relocation or construction of new or expanded water,wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage,electric power,natural gas,or telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects; • Insufficient water supplies available to serve the proposed project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal,dry and multiple dry years; • A determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the proposed project that it has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments; • The generation of solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals; • Incompliance with Federal, State, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste. 3.19.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities,the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would involve the construction of five single-family homes. Due to the nature of the proposed project, water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities would not be required to be relocated or constructed. The increase in demand for these facilities and services can be adequately handled and no expansion of these services is required (refer to the following subsections).These utility lines,however,would need to be extended to the site.The proposed five single family units would connect to utility lines located in Arapaho Road including existing electrical power lines and an existing eight-inch water main. The sewer and water lines would be extended into the proposed project site within the proposed Arapaho Road cul-de-sac. From there,laterals would be extended to the individual units. Electrical services are provided by the Southern California Edison (SCE) and the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU). Domestic water service is provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). The Southern California Gas company provides natural gas service. These services would be readily available to the proposed project site upon request. Aboveground SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 103 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 electrical lines and an underground gas line extend to the site.As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. B. Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? • Less than Significant Impact. Water services in Rancho Cucamonga are provided by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). In addition to Rancho Cucamonga,the CVWD serves portions of the cities of Upland, Ontario, and Fontana, and some unincorporated areas of San Bernardino County. In total, CVWD has approximately 49,600 water connections and serves a population of approximately 186,000 within a 47 square-mile area. The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) is the sole water provider for Rancho Cucamonga. The District's service area encompasses the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga, the City's Sphere of Influence and,in addition,portions of Fontana,Ontario,and Upland. The majority of CVWD's water comes from two sources: imported water from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) and groundwater from the Chino and Cucamonga Basins. Other sources include local surface and sub-surface water flows, such as local canyon runoff, and recycled water. CVWD primary sources of water supply come from groundwater and imported water. The District primarily gets their water supply from groundwater in order to keep it at a reasonable cost for their customers by limiting the dependence of importing water. Building new wells to capture groundwater helps to ensure there are sufficient water supplies during time of drought,regulatory constraints or emergencies. The CVWD maintained 23 groundwater wells,of which 13 were in service with a maximum production capacity of 20,490 gallons per minute (or an annual production equivalent of 33,076 acre-feet). CVWD's water distribution system is comprised of 690 miles of distribution mains, 22 pump stations,and 39 pressure-reducing valve stations. The CVWD has 34 water storage facilities that vary in size from 13 to 16 million gallons,with a combined design storage capacity of 89.6 million gallons. The CVWD relies on the City's General Plan to project future water needs and demand. Since the proposed 5- unit development is consistent with the General Plan,demand can be accommodated. As shown in Table 3-12 below, the proposed project would generate a net increase in water demand of approximately 1,950 gallons per day(gpd)of water. Therefore,the City's water purveyor would be able to accommodate the proposed project's increased water demand and no new or expanded water treatment facilities would be required. With respect to water treatment facilities,the proposed project would have a less than significant impact. Table 3-12 Water Consumption(gals/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Single-Family Residential 5 units 390 gals/day/unit 1,950 gals/day Total Generation 1,950 gals/day Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 104 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 The existing water supply facilities can accommodate this additional demand. Therefore, the proposed project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the proposed project. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. C. Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments?•Less than Significant Impact. With a large portion of water coming from local sources that include canyon surface waters and groundwater,CVWD has developed three water treatment facilities so that water quality meets all Federal and State requirements: • Arthur H.Bridge Treatment Plant • Royer Nesbit Treatment Plant • Lloyd W.Michael Treatment Plant Water that is imported from the Metropolitan Water District is treated at the Lloyd W. Michael Water Treatment Plant. The treated water flows into storage reservoirs and then into the distribution system. Groundwater and surface water is treated at the Arthur H. Bridge and Royer Nesbit Water Treatment Plants. After treatment,the water is stored in enclosed reservoirs ready for distribution to consumers. Wastewater is any water that drains from showers, sinks, and toilets in buildings. Other sources of wastewater include laundry facilities and industrial and manufacturing operations. Wastewater conveyance is handled by the City and CVWD, and wastewater is processed by CVWD and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). The IEUA operates the wastewater Regional Plant No. 4 located at the intersection of 6th Street and Etiwanda Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. This wastewater plant treats an annual flow of seven million gallons per day,with an ultimate build-out capacity of 28 million gallons per day. As indicated in Table 3-13,the future development is projected to generate 1,300 gallons of effluent on a daily basis,representing a fraction of one percent of the available wastewater regional plant capacity. As such,the wastewater regional plant would have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project and the impacts would be less than significant. Table 3-13 Wastewater(Effluent) Generation(gals/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Single-Family Residential 5 units 26o gals/day/unit 1,300 gals/day Total Generation 1,300 gals/day Source: Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 105 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 D. Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards,or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? •Less than Significant Impact. Solid waste collection and transport are handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to several regional landfills and materials recycling facilities. Burrtec Services,Inc collects residential solid waste in the City and the waste is transported to the West Valley Transfer Station and other handlers in the surrounding area.For household waste disposal,Rancho Cucamonga contracts with a private hauling firm that utilizes a three-container system for recycling and waste disposal. The blue bin allows for recyclable materials including paper,cartons,metal cans and trays,glass bottles and jars,and plastic container items. The green bin allows for green waste such as grass clippings,brush,prunings,leaves,tree trimmings,twigs, weeds, and other green waste. The black bin allows for materials that are not recyclable or compostable. The City also implements various programs with local businesses and public agencies to increase recycling efforts. In order to reduce the amount of solid waste generated in California, the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) required that the amount of solid waste sent to landfills be reduced by 50 percent by the year 2000, per Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939)• In 2oo8, the California State Senate passed Senate Bill 1o16 (SB 1o16) that builds upon AB 939• The City of Rancho Cucamonga has achieved and exceeded the target numbers identified by CIWMB in SB 1o16 and continues to improve existing programs, as well as develop and implement new programs to minimize waste generation and increase recycling. As indicated in Table 3-14,the future daily solid waste generation is projected to be 61.2 pounds per day. The proposed project would contribute a limited amount to the waste stream. Table 3-14 Solid Waste Generation(lbs/day) Use Unit Factor Generation Single-Family Residential 5 units 12.23 lbs/day/unit 61.2 lbs/day 60 Total Generation 61.2 lbs/day Source:Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning The proposed project,like all other development in Rancho Cucamonga,will be required to adhere to City ordinances (Municipal Code Title 8, Health & Safety, Chapter 8.17. Refuse, Recyclables, and Organics Collections) with respect to waste reduction and recycling. The amount of solid waste generated by the proposed project is within the available capacities of area landfills. Therefore, the proposed project's impacts to regional landfill capacity would be less than significant. E. Would the project comply with Federal,State,and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?•No Impact. The proposed project, like all other development in Rancho Cucamonga, would be required to adhere to City ordinances(Municipal Code Title 8,Health&Safety,Chapter 8.17.Refuse,Recyclables,and Organics SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 1o6 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Collections)including with respect to waste reduction and recycling. As a result,no impacts related to State and local statutes governing solid waste are anticipated. 3.19.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of utilities impacts indicated that no significant impacts would result from the proposed project's approval and subsequent implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.20 WILDFIRE 3.20.1 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, acting as Lead Agency, a project may be deemed to have a significant adverse impact if it results in any of the following located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones: • If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,a substantial impairment of an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; • If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, the exacerbation of wildfire risks due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, and thereby exposing project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire; • If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, the requirement of the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities)that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment would the project; or, • If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, the exposure of people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. 3.20.2 ANALYSIS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS A. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?•Less than Significant Impact. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 107 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 The proposed project site and the adjacent properties are urbanized and there are no areas of native or natural vegetation found within the vicinity of the proposed project area.74 However,Rancho Cucamonga is located 2.50 miles south of the base of the San Gabriel Mountains. This proximity creates the potential for natural hazards. Rancho Cucamonga's location adjacent to the San Bernardino National Forest and San Gabriel Mountains puts it at high risk for Wildland Urban Interface(WUI)fires. This type of fire begins in the chaparral north of the City and can spread to structures in those areas and on the perimeter of the City. Open spaces along the foothills can lead to wildland fires,endangering residential properties that abut the wildland/urban interface. The threat of fire to hillside developments at the base of the San Gabriel Mountains is of real concern to Rancho Cucamonga residents living in the foothills. In 2003,the Grand Prix Fire burned through the entire Wildland Urban Interface(WUI)area of Rancho Cucamonga over a three-day period. Fifteen homes,three of which were in the City and twelve in the Sphere of Influence,were destroyed and more were damaged. Thousands of homes were threatened and evacuated. Exhibit 3-11 illustrates the fire hazard severity zones identified by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL Fire). As part of a comprehensive plan to protect Rancho Cucamonga from the threats of wildland fires, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District(RCFPD)has established recommendations for fire prevention,public education, strategic locations of new fire stations, reduction and modification of vegetation, assurance of adequate water supply,and strict access provisions related to new development.The proposed project site is located on the edge of a very high fire hazard severity zone. However, the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan outlines various policies for wildfire abatement. These policies include: • Policy LU-8.9:Restrict intensive uses and activities in areas where they would be threatened by natural or man-made hazards. Certain portions of our City are vulnerable to flooding and wildfire damage. Though other hazards exist,these two are the most prevalent. We want to make sure that intensities of development in areas vulnerable to these hazards are kept to a minimum and,in the limited cases where they do occur,that life and property are protected to the maximum degree feasible. • Policy LU-1o.2: Encourage the planting of edible landscapes, using citrus trees, box gardens, vineyards,and other edible plant materials whenever possible. Edible landscaping is the process of planting edible plants in spaces other than in a traditional garden. Edible landscapes save space as they combine landscaping and food-growing into a single space. It is a very sustainable method of landscaping that refers back to Rancho Cucamonga's beginnings as an agrarian community. Converting power line utility corridors to this use can promote and preserve the heritage of Rancho Cucamonga while significantly reducing the fire hazards presented by these uninterrupted rights of way. Utility corridors and the invasive grasses that they support have a high potential for transporting hillside wildfires into the residential and urban areas of the City. 74 Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning. Site Survey. Survey was conducted on December 19,2018. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 1o8 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Fire Hazards Severity Zones Nodarate High r Very High Fire Stations r Canyon ! n\\ #Exising Fire Stations QW9E • San 1.Rre Station No 171 oevamS `1 {� 2.Fire Station No.17 �`\S\ Canyon 3.Fire Station No.173 •:y 4.Fire Station No.174 CITY 5.Fire Station No.175 6-Fire Station No 176 \ F D N TA N A 7-Fire Station No_177 Future Fire Station YNtle R 8.Fire Station No.178 4YYeon Av Base Map Rancho Cucamonga City Boundary __-- Z` of Inp- ere uenw noon won at Sph x � ■ Project Site I km srm Rm,.b I _ I Cenfrat A Park 2�. Llne Ave I Ir I 4 Or s -C FootM1ill Elva 4 q i n EPre for y / Amos Nwy 1 V f EXHIBIT 3-11 FIRE HAZARD SEVERITY ZONES SOURCE:CTPY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA GENERAL PLAN SECTION 3 9 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 109 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 • Policy LU-io.3: Promote low water usage and emphasize fire-safe defensible space. With water a limited resource and wildfires a constant threat, the use of drought tolerant or fire resistant plant material can make a big difference. • Policy RC-3.2: Encourage the conversion of water-intensive turf/landscape areas to landscaping that uses climate-appropriate plants,efficient irrigation systems,and water efficient site maintenance. To conserve water resources and control maintenance costs, the City's current Water Efficiency Ordinance discourages extensive use of non-native vegetation that requires excessive watering. In particular,the Water Efficiency Ordinance specifies the use of drought tolerant and fire-resistant vegetation with an emphasis on native species. The City updated its Water Efficiency Ordinance based on the State Department of Water Resources model ordinance, which allows for artificial turf. • Policy RC-8.6: Consult with the Fire District, San Bernardino County, and State agencies to develop plans that protect open space from fire hazards. Over the years, the City has learned a great deal on how landscape design can minimize the risk from fire hazards. The Fire District has been proactive in defining standards and implementing those standards throughout the City. • Policy PS-1.1: Reduce the loss of life, property, and injuries incurred as a result of fires by offering and supporting comprehensive fire prevention, public education, and emergency response programs. Fire hazards pose a threat to Rancho Cucamonga residents, especially in areas near the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). Fire prevention is effective when it includes public education and appropriate land use restrictions,as well as adequate facilities and personnel to mitigate fires when they occur. The Fire District is expected to continually develop effective prevention and response strategies to address this constant risk. • Policy PS-1.2: Strive to limit loss of life and property as a result of wildland fires through adequate wildland fire protection services, education and enforcement of defensible space and brush clearance requirements,and wildland fire evacuation and preparedness plans. The dry vegetation north of the City is conducive to quick moving and high-heat fires that can spread rapidly and cause damage to structures and homes. Keeping brush and vegetation away from structures is critical to decreasing risks to these structures,and evacuation and preparedness plans are necessary to ensure that responses to wildland fires are coordinated and efficient. The Fire District shall routinely assess the current threat to life and property in the WUI. Needs for improvements in response capability will be identified. The City should also expand the existing education and warning system that can be activated following significant wildland fires on the hillsides above the City. Education efforts can include mailers to households in the affected areas, SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 110 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 public meetings,and/or door-to-door education campaigns that inform the public of wildland fire safety tips and procedures. The proposed project will involve the construction of five single-family homes within a project site that is surrounded by existing single-family homes. Due to the nature of the proposed project,the impacts would be less than significant because the impacts would be no greater than those in the surrounding area. In addition,compliance with the abovementioned policies would ensure that the impacts will remain less than significant. Furthermore,the proposed project would not involve the closure or alteration of any existing evacuation routes that would be important in the event of a wildfire. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. B. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project due to slope,prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family homes. The proposed project site is located among residential uses and is located in an area that has previously been heavily modified and graded to accommodate the surrounding residential uses. The majority of the proposed project area is currently vacant and covered over in dirt. There is no risk from wildfire within the proposed project site or the surrounding area given the project site's distance from any area that may be subject to a wildfire event. In addition,the proposed project site is surrounded on all sides by urban uses. The site's future development,including the construction of the new roadway extension that will extend into the site which would allow better access for emergency vehicles. Finally,the new residential development will include new residential construction and landscaping which will further reduce the wildfire risk. As a result,the impacts would be less than significant. C. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure(such as roads,fuel breaks,emergency water sources,power lines,or other utilities)that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment?•Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would include the installation of new utility lines such as gas lines,water lines, etc. These utilities lines will be located below ground surface, which would reduce the likelihood of a fire igniting. In addition,the new roadway extension will extend into the site which would allow better access for emergency vehicles. Finally,the new residential development will include new residential construction and landscaping which will further reduce the wildfire risk. As a result, the impacts would be less than significant. D. If located in or near State responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones,would the project expose people or structures to significant risks,including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides,as a result of runoff,post fire slope instability,or drainage changes?•No Impact. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 111 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 A major rainstorm following a wildfire in the local mountains may result in localized flooding and mudslides. The proposed project site is located 2 1/2 miles south of the San Gabriel Mountains. Given the distance of the proposed project site from these local mountains,the project site would not be exposed to mud flows.As a result,no impacts would result. 3.20.3 MITIGATION MEASURES The analysis of wildfire impacts indicated that no significant impacts would result from the proposed project's approval and subsequent implementation. As a result,no mitigation is required. 3.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE The following findings can be made regarding the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 15o65 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the results of this environmental assessment: • The proposed project will not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. As indicated in Section 3.1 through 3.20,the proposed project would not result in any significant unmitigable environmental impacts. • The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. The proposed project would not lead to a cumulatively significant impact on any of the issues analyzed herein. • The proposed project would not have environmental effects which would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly. As indicated in Section 3.1 through 3.20,the proposed project would not result in any significant unmitigable environmental impacts. SECTION 3•ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PAGE 112 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 SECTION 4 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 FINDINGS The Initial Study determined that the proposed project is not expected to have significant adverse environmental impacts. The following findings can be made regarding the Mandatory Findings of Significance set forth in Section 15o65 of the CEQA Guidelines based on the results of this Initial Study: • The proposed project would not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of an endangered,rare or threatened species or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. • The proposed project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. • The proposed project would not have environmental effects which would cause substantially adverse effects on human beings,either directly or indirectly. • A Mitigation Reporting and Monitoring Program would be required. 4.2 MITIGATION MONITORING In addition, pursuant to Section 21o81(a) of the Public Resources Code,findings must be adopted by the decision-maker coincidental to the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, which relates to the Mitigation Monitoring Program. These findings shall be incorporated as part of the decision-maker's findings of fact,in response to AB-318o and in compliance with the requirements of the Public Resources Code. In accordance with the requirements of Section 21o81(a)and 21o81.6 of the Public Resources Code, the City of La Puente can make the following additional findings: • A mitigation monitoring and reporting program will be required; and, • An accountable enforcement agency or monitoring agency shall be identified for the mitigation measures adopted as part of the decision-maker's final determination. Mitigation measures have been recommended as a means to reduce or eliminate potential adverse environmental impacts to insignificant levels. AB-318o requires that a monitoring and reporting program be adopted for the recommended mitigation measures. SECTION 4 0 CONCLUSIONS PAGE 113 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SECTION 4•CONCLUSIONS PAGE 114 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 SECTION 5 REFERENCES 5.1 PREPARERS Blodgett Baylosis Environmental Planning 2211 South Hacienda Boulevard,Suite 107 Hacienda Heights,CA 91745 (626)336-o033 Marc Blodgett,Project Principal Alejandra Rocha,Project Manager Alexander Huynh,Project Planner 5.2 REFERENCES Bugliarello,et.Al, The Impact of Noise Pollution, Chapter 127, 1975• California Department of Conservation,Regulatory Maps. California Department of Conservation,State of California Williamson Act Contract Land. California Department of Conservation, Table 4,Cities and Counties Affected by Alquist Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones as of January 2010. California Department of Conservation, Well Finder,DOGGR GIS. California Department of Fish and Wildlife,Bios Viewer. California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Historical Landmarks, 2014. California Department of Toxic Substances Control,DTSC's Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List— Site Cleanup(Cortese List). California Department of Transportation, California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2014, as revised March 2018. California Department of Transportation, Officially Designated State Scenic Highways. California Department of Transportation,Outdoor Advertising Act,Business and Professions Code. California Public Resources Code Division 13, The California Environmental Quality Act, Chapter 2.5, Section 21o67 and Section 21o69, 2012. California Water Boards,GAMA,Groundwater Information System. SECTION 5•REFERENCES PAGE 115 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Rancho Cucamonga,City of,General Plan. Rancho Cucamonga,City of,Municipal Code. Google Earth. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook,April 1993• South Coast Air Quality Management District,Final 2016 Air Quality Plan, adopted March 2017. South Coast Air Quality Management District,Rule 403,Fugitive Dust, as amended June 3, 2005. United States Department of Agriculture, Web Soil Survey. United States Department of the Interior,National Park Service,National Register of Historic Places, 2010. United States Environmental Protection Agency,Envirofacts-Multisystem Search. United States Fish and Wildlife Service,National Wetlands Inventory—V2. SECTION 5•REFERENCES PAGE 116 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 APPENDICES APPENDICES PAGE 117 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. APPENDICES PAGE 118 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 APPENDIX A: AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 119 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 � < ) -- < S d ` 2 j / � ) 2 ■ - [ � k a .a 3 ( m q § 2 R k � « / -- 2 E § 1p ® / \ E _ 3 / / k ) k` tE .2 ® / 0 l)ff a �a 7 0 E _ ) J e / ; $ ° 2 ~ LL \ in E } © ) k ky 5 o ; 7■ � 7 j k ff a ; ) m | } c $ § r § \ L ; E %LmL ƒ \ K > m # } j \ § ■ § % ] _ ƒ f J ƒ �� G - t ; Lu\ \ § ` ) k j \ \ ) k \ y ¥ ! ; < AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 120 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Q rn N Ql O N CA QI d1 ;C ;O ;O ;G U N Q 1$ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I$ to Ia 1 to to I� P5 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m ..*...G.. ...G..4..4 4..4 4..4 4 44 4... .. ... ..�...G..�...G G G G ..�... ..�... ..�... ..�.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iZ m ; � U ° m o 'o 'o ;W ;W ;W {] Z .2 .Z O ;d ;g U N � "i N ..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..y...F..*...F..*...F..*.. a W W 1p p ;Q ;Q ;E3, ;Q ;Q b t t b b b 000 7 000 PPP N_ ' 'N 'M 'N 'M 'N ' M 'N ' M 'N 'LL_ 'IL '_LL 'LL '_LL 'LL ' ; ;$ 2 2 o ❑ 'o ❑ 'o ❑ 'v 'v 'o ❑ 'o ❑ 'o '£ 'f3 'f3 'S U 'U '[] 'U '[] 'U '[] 'U 'L3 'U 'L] 'U 'L] W W U AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 121 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 2 }w 2� § fw 9 - k � ¥ § § § § \ v` a § § < \ 22 | | LL �- © J ---- --- 2 )) ƒ( --- k r - - 2 � TEL � k \ f [ Lu U 2 \ E ( \ \ ° § 2-- � \ o \ j \ } \ ■ q \ 0 o k - w r4 § E AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 122 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 < ! % q_ ° § � � j ! % \ a , ❑ � � a E ; \ ) n & / a § � / . 2 $ ; ) \ ) = a f 2 $ j ) LL m J! ; E !2 R 3 � { 2 m ) J c § a § ) q § e � a a \ 2 L U ] | AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE Ga CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 is b tl ¢ o II IIa o ZB C m6 mp zi d41 '$ m a P mh 4 c m o c QCj ��_ $ I I $ IA§ I 0 m a� I- Ia gI I fL LL Ln a ng II`r$ II�+g a ng IIr III 41 ----r----rn__. b a o a o {) --f---- ---- ----f---- --- O � U � [� -- N o V to I o V to O W gg I I g W 0 0 ----f----f---- ----f----F---- CL 4 I IQ Q L I� la e C) rrr r�rrrr`■rrr rrr■�rrrr�rrrr a Lu� s o Lu : E U N [,l AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 124 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 s CD 2 ! § § � $ 2 { - ) 2 ; ° a 7\r} \7}7 \R L3 # j / Z. ƒ } �® \ E I I I \ \ �@ 0 / « ® o �o ;o�o 0 ] ;§ ;§ k ) t°IE ! § '§ '� . �) j L n }--7-- m - k � E § _ H\ / k \ � - § L 0. $ � o } ED k ; \ r� ■ '/ . '® 2 & § § m 2 - : / t L§ § _ .) . m ) Qj k \ - - / =S f \ ) ) j® } ) \ .; g ...�..f . 5 02 j 2t w o ] �k AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE12 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 rn - lu a x x - - x � y 111 � o _ 2 � - 1 1 1 - •"1 � Q 01 � 01 Go G1 � [�/ a R i 1 1 1- 1 9 1 L� L� = 1 1 1 ;(b ;'4; ;c ; ;c-� ;� I� l ilj� 115 it Iln = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I p :ml 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 O a O r r r Ir R R R I R -c I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I Y I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I J CL i, n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I - � I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I v o v a � 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 d p la Ip la I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I ~ p ;,:i ;p V1 I I I I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 W E 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I• L.L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Is I rz � ICI I I I I Iy ;� l I� I� lyl I 'O m I,(j I N Io I n S W 1� 1 1 1 1 1 1❑ 1� 1.-- 1� 1� 1'� 1 1� 1❑ H n I� I I�1- N 1 p (�f 1v � � 1� 1 1 1 1 1 l y 1 19 1[�] I N I 1 19 1 1 1 l O 1 1 1 1 l O 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I Q yy1 i i n i i i q i i q i i_� i n m 11 11 11 1� I ry I Y 1 � I S 1� I n 1 N 1� 1� 1� 1� 1� 1 3 1�• I m f� I f(5 I p3 I L] tr [V I d I 1 4 I k I IR 1 I 1 I I I I I I N I 1 I I I Icy Icy 1� Iw la 1� Irc 1� Im 1� 1� 1� Im la Im y 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 1 w w� I I I � I I I C) 2 I I I o I I I > ' 4 '4 '4 '7 im ' 4 L ri a �[} ts W _ ,U ,U .0 ,U ¢ ¢ ,U W w 'a w ,w ,a m ,w m ° v , ' d C '4 LI AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 126 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 d V G A A R Ql V IOe A r -4--- 05 o I s s N N uu I N w � ca � P 4--- LL o It N U r 4--- Q I� � N L O a u O D W0 N = ____n n W N N = la d m � C -- C R ❑ i p O G! N on S I C a m a e d a .45 cu w - _ xaj o W 4 S Y m r 6 N = i C7 f 7 AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 127 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 ¢¢ am da S � M a 'mod c Ic la m c Im a a e m p ip I m � Ism �m ui - ---I----I - -- ry ----I�-- o 8 N ry G W a -- LL -- L LL �a x � i� i�� � 'a c) a o to to o ' LL ----4----E---- LL ----E--- � ci N. -- -- cm 0 Lu CD Lu m CV O = c to to d O C 0 4 Ia p d I v 0 0 w m ''n C7 � AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 128 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 ;gym m� - N r II w O __F----F____ ---- ---- IN co V. a I� I�i a to c N � Q1 V GG 8 Gh 8 �- � V rto i� a 4 N S c tIo II_ -tuj wa c IIm ^ a G IG 16 a LLd M I � ~ G IO IO G a~ I� n lL 6a T I 1 § a a O 1In 0 ---- ---- ----4--- ca o N g g ° t' _ cm 9 w N o IE la o °_ I G R m C O G G O U O Q a o a) !`4ra C C4 y o a a G cm p n ri AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 129 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 N r � O 11 Ib 0 4 o I I a O ? n n n m G Ia m Wy G M Q -- -r- --r -- -- -r- - ry 04 I I $ _ 4 w 4 a wa CV LL G 16 1O v =a I o I I� m � 1 • a N a a la la a I^ a� LLa T I I`s a 0 ---4----� -- -- -4- - } LL ----4----4---- ----4___ c d fq Im d o I? o __ _ w Lu o z I I a z Im c� n , 3 0 o I I-0 14 U C m U W w 'r, s - M C C7 � AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 130 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 m gg gg ,,gg m S N m o ---- ---- ---- -- - N o T �-, N c o & o E U C] ZZ G- 1I G II1 n_ 1+ � ry ff o 8 a~ $❑ j$o j❑ o a~ cj t �M -- N o 0 VS w er r ev ❑ I❑ Ip d 5�05 �Q45 D LL � �� c I❑ I a �6 ) ----4----E---- N � j js "8 s c7 @ -- -- - cCD 67 cai cY C --o - _ cv w m 0 3 c n Y a N N G Ip I❑ G p cn CO - c U c 3 W U c-i c AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 131 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 a ;1� :9 (fl •! G �r� a N N a o m �I o K Ii $ N ----4----4---- -- VS L� Iti Im d ----r----r--- -- - L w W a I II w 0 1- h r � a a o sr 0 y2 Q R Y I8 la LL m 0 s (V = G N IFN 7 G o o gg I1 o : CD co S to c� o ._ o o r4 m y ° -- - w :� a m o C m C m U W - u - w m m .E V = ~ V ~ AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 132 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 t3 25 n g�,o L [V _ II II ry ____4----F---- ____F___ O II II II rz N g$ rn 4 � 8 11 8 c o -4- --� -- -- -4- - 0 p ---.L_.._L.--. ❑ S S Q 4 ❑ m cq I I I a� c IN Im b a� G IG c I � cs w c n m w a a LL Q ----f----f--- n -f--- a� ----4---- ---- ----4--- Il Ifi Ili b 1 11 1 N � -- o II I d -- o -F�--['- m --F- - ', Q cm1 III& I$ o m o R II R G o a a c N O C W o -- -- ---- -'o ❑ v, --- U ❑ = c Ip I c 0 z $ o -- m -- CD w n CD O n Q� CO ::: U Lu a z - W Lu - m ri ri AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 133 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 G O �N H U G t0 ry � 11 N � o a Ip Im ``5a to ----4�----4---- ~ --4- - a~ 4 jo jo 6 6 jG u' s p c W ci_.-�p.__�-_-. w --_�o.- a r � 11 1 a I y �� a to la ati � Ic c L � � � I� I�g u'3a a o c 0 � 7 LL o " __ -- w -- .� ry O M w a w 8 m 4 d c c U C __ 3 Q - _ �--Ig __I�-- iy C3. C ry Q G IQ O G y IG V -:ii i iirliiii 0 •i ii iii ai m ca r Lu C - Girl 6 W u I u7 Z AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 134 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 a d �N id c7 0 n ry � p� ---- ---- ---- ---- --' ry o 1 N i= 1y pQ4 -4----4--- ---4- ry ---IN n/ P 1�_ dr 4 jo jGr G jG u' 1 I o I a p W �_ f a � 6 _ a CV 0 I I�g u'3a Io a 0 tq LL o N n - N 0 -- T O *' o n -- Lu Lu m 4 Id Ia o I� C l4 a o L g S I8 I e I m n y n m x 4 I01 Ia c p ri Io 7 m L) m tu U c-i Z ri a AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 135 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 U a 16 .d U c n ----f----f---- 2 ----��_ p C`1 1 1 C a to to a Id c G1 � I� - -F- --� -- - -�- - in �❑ g a 4u r a to IK� o ar c Ic d -- -r- --r -- -- -r- - N W a p --�4---�¢--- O LL a ----I--- O LL a I� la a �a I I I I VJ u~ G 16 10 G dr 14 G LL 16 I� - „tea c to c m 0 c 16 1ci � Kb - O n u 00 8 1$ 18 $ a 18 S3 o y a o d ti❑° "= ` -if----i� - � �= � �e- f4 � - - WQy U a Wm o a ti o U f m Lp - --a .i U WLu e) Q AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 136 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 S v c c d d O ---- ---- ---- N x ti ----4----figg---- gg � S i8 i8 8 5 m d c o d ❑ N � I I � I 1 N 4 Lu d 4 a d as 0 c a to la a LL U LL d o a a --4----�---- U N � a 540� Spa_ o m Ir N V I a 125 8 ¢7 G7 O a O M N a a o Q S7 m W - U O 4 II II p O g----r----C---- o c L) m w - a a� m Q _ 0 U AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 137 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 < % .$ \ _ --*-- c § --}-- / : ) 7 ci k -- § 2 §\ \-�--� / 7 % k ;! - - In ; .§ -- ( in < E N - § % o { f k } ) ) Lu ' - - % --}-- G f -- F-- / - $ } \k } § lo ` ° ) ---F + 2 d � o ) - \ \ F / \ 10 E 1p § . r. E \ / I § { ! '} \ 5 \ a) \$ - C13 u- - G ` 9 2 \ ] # m ± AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE ma CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 ) ) \ < ) \ ° }! < ;� 9 . ) --}-- -- ; 77 |§! 7§ ): -- % I-}-- ® - 2 ] } :§ \ E ----- � z � \ --}-- -- h $§ !, - 2 cs -- R 2 & § u� CL 7 --}-- -- ƒ )/ r § ft ; 2- § }! �§! -- # ) j -�-- k -- § > \ j S } AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 139 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 ! \ ( < , �® ) ---- \ $; \ \ § § ---- � ) ( a o § ■ � ! k _ < ! $2 A§ J ---- � k , ---- Q % ! ---- % \� ! ; d J b # ] k ` ( & $ (� / '9 k ) ) \ ( 2 § \ \ \ � ! /! — � 4 K § t k � / ) CD / / , © c%l en ] ■ ® § G j f } AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE ko CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 6 N d O 'G G 1 o ;a d d o ---- ---- ---- -E----E---- o _ � r I r L g r IA ¢ I IS In n m d la m I Id Id d _V __ _g _ ____ g_ _- _-_ g d o g _�8 rG '.. 13 Ilog 3 1- N ry 5a x w N Icy J `� ry [J N y! � y.3 N � N N a 8 d 1 I n I a N I N ci _ _ N nj ns a 1 0 LL -' N H U � I 1 i N IN ..-.F-..-F....Fa.-. N r m I II II 1 O a ie I I� la `a 10 0 1� ----�----�o---�a--- d Lu W U iti la _ �e p -- a h---- U ----ir--iy�- i�-- m c7 n N j � d Id 7 r a to to la d joss NINE In 111111mosoll Is bill son fL is � � rn W 2' 'Q, d Y ' __ �E 'F 45 Lu L ry � V '7 N •� '8 U C N V CU � AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 141 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Q d d o c d Q� V [E ❑ 4 I II IP P L L I` tNp I I Iv 0 m - -------------'--- - ar 45 i i iNO ��3�333v o (D 6i 14 41 _ _ _ _ u- Ln r � m �a L g I Ig I� a �_ n a = ❑ t4 is a)- � pQR N N W �' a g I Ia I�$ �4 0 o Lm ,h N a -f- --f -- f-- - _ o W pp g n n N I 18 I p tV z °' w °' C L � � rrrr�rrrr`rrrr�rrrr ❑ Q ❑ Q O n C f4 a`a `-rn .�+ Q1 U) Q1 47 W ram+ m rz a a o r o r- r vo w o) r AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 142 CITY 7 RANCHO CCAMoG,INITIAL STUDY k MITIGATED NEGATivEncLARAzN FivE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TE RMINU&GARAPAORO m RANCHO CCAMoGC 91739 � < § & % J § ` 2 m k � % ( [ k � $ z � / § } � ] § 2 : / $ & 3 � k % % ) { & \ ` £ c ± 2 � = m } [ § 3 cli a � § 2 � 5 ; /en K - R \ \ ( \ / w w - k _ \ $ \ o ° \ \ AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE#a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. AIR QUALITY WORKSHEETS PAGE 144 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 APPENDIX B: UTILITIES WORKSHEETS UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 145 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 INTRODUCTION TO UTILITY SCREENING TABLES The following worksheets are used to evaluated the potential impacts of a project. Table 1 Definition of Project This Table is used to establish the proposed development parameters that are used the calculation of utilities usage_ The independent variable to be entered is identified by shading. For residential development,the number of housing units should be entered in the shaded area. For non-residential development,the total floor area of development should be entered in the shaded area. Tables 2 Summary of Project Impacts Consumption/Generation Rates. This table indicates the development's projected electrical consumption,natural gas consumption,water consumption,effluent generation,and solid waste generation. No modifications should be made to this table. Tables 3 through 7 Calculation of Project Impacts Tables 3through 7 indicate the results of the analysis_ Table 3 Electrical Consumption-This Table calculates the projected electrical consumption for new development. Default generation rates provided in the shaded areas may be changed_ Table d Natural Gas Consumption-This Table calculates the projected natural gas useagefor new development_ Default generation rates provided in the shaded areas may be changed_ Table 5 Water Consumption-This Table calculates the projected water consumption ratesfor new development. Default generation rates provided in the shaded areas may be changed_ Table 6 Sewage Generation-This Table calculates the projected effluent generation rates for new development. Default generation rates provided in the shaded areas may be changed_ Table 7 Solid Waste Generation-This Table calculates the projected waste generation for new development. Default generation rates provided in the shaded areas may be changed_ UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 146 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 1 Project Name:15 single-Family Homes Definition of Project Parameters-Enter independent variable(no.of units or floor area)in the shaded area. The independent variable to be entered is the number of units(for residential development)or the gross floor area(for non-residential development)_ Land Use Independent Factor Residential Uses Variable Total Units Single-Family Residential No.of Units 5 Medium Density Residential No.of Units 0 Multiple-Family Residential No.of Units 0 Mobile Home No.of Units 0 Office Uses Variable Total Floor Area Office Sq.Ft. 0 Medical Office Building Sq.Ft. 0 Office Park Sq.Ft. 0 BanklFinancial Services Sq.Ft. 0 Commercial Uses Variable Floor ArealRooms Specialty Retail Commercial Sq.Ft. 0 Convenience Store Sq.Ft. 0 Movie Theater Sq.Ft. 0 Shopping Center Sq.Ft. 0 Sit-Down Restaurant Sq.Ft. 0 Fast-Food Restaurant Sq.Ft. 0 Hotel I Rooms 0 Manufacturing Uses Variable Total Floor Area Industrial Park Sq.Ft. 0 Manufacturing Sq.Ft. 0 General Light Industry Sq.Ft. 0 Warehouse Sq.Ft. 0 Publiclinstitutional Variable Total Floor Area Publicllnstitutional Sq.Ft. 0 Open Space Sq.Ft. 0 Table 2: Projected Utility Consumption and Generation Summary of Projectlmpacts -Results of analysis identified below. No modifications should be made to this Table. Utilities Consumption and Generation Factor Rates Electrical Consumption kWhlday 77 Natural Gas Consumption cubic feet/day 91 Water Consumption gallonslday 1,850 Sewage Generation gallons/day 1,300 Solid Waste Generation I pounds/day 1 61 UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 147 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 3: Electrical Consumption Project Units of Projected Component Measure Consumption Factor Consumption Residential Uses No.of Units kWh Variable kWhfUnit/Day Single-Family Residential 5 5,625.00 kWhfUnit[Year 77.1 Medium Density Residential D 5,625.00 kWhfUnitfYear 0.0 Multiple-Family Residential D 5,625.00 kWhfUnitfYear 0.0 Mobile Home D 4,644.00 kWhfUnitfYear 0.0 Office Uses Sq.Ft. kWh Variable kWh1Sq.Ft.fDay Office 0 20.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Medical Office Building 0 14.21) kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Office Park 0 20.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 BankfFinancial Services 0 20.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Commercial Uses Sq.Ft.fRooms kWh Variable kWh/Sq.Ft./Day Specialty Retail Commercial 0 16.00 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Convenience Store 0 16.00 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Movie Theater 0 16.DD kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Shopping Center 0 35.90 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0 Sit-Down Restaurant 0 49.10 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Fast-Food Restaurant 0 49.10 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Hotel 0 8,966.00 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Manufacturing Uses Sq.Ft. kWh Variable kWh1Sq.FtJDay Industrial Park 0 4.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Manufacturing 0 4.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 General Light Industry 0 4.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Warehouse 0 4.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 PubliGlnstitutional Sq.Ft. kWh Variable kWh/Sq.Ft./Day Publicflnstitutional 0 4.80 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Open Space 0 1 0.00 kWh/Sq.Ft.fYear 0.0 Total Daily Electrical Consumption(kWhfday) 77.1 Sources: Residential rates were derived from the SCAQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook(April 1993). All other rates are from Common Forecasting Methodology VII Demand Farms,1989 UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 148 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 4: Natural Gas Consumption Project Units of Projected Component Measure Consumption Factor Gonsumption Residential Uses No.of Units Cu.Ft.of Nat.Gas Variable Cu.Ft,IDay Single-Family Residential 5 6,665.00 Cu.Ft.1ModUnit 91.3 Medium Density Residential 0 4,011.50 Cu.Ft.1ModUnit 0.0 Multiple-Family Residential 0 4,011.50 Cu.Ft.1ModUnit 0.0 Mobile Home 0 4,011.50 Cu.Ft.1ModUnit 0.0 Office Uses Sq.Ft. Cu.Ft.of Nat.Gas Variable Cu.F1,10ay Office 0 2.00 Cu.Ft.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 Medical Office Building 0 2.00 Cu.Ft.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 Office Park 0 2.00 Cu.Ft.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 BanklFinancial Services 0 2.00 Cu.Ft.1Mo.l6q.Ft. 0.0 Commercial Uses Sq.Ft./Rooms Cu.Ft.of Nat.Gas Variable Cu.Ft,/Day Specialty Retail Commercial 0 2.90 Cu.Ft./Mo./Sq.Ft. 0.0 Convenience Store 0 2.90 Cu.Pt./Mo./Sq.Ft. 0.0 Movie Theater 0 2.90 Cu.Ft.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 Shopping Center 0 2.90 Cu.Ft.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 Sit-Down Restaurant 0 2.90 Cu.Ft./Mo./Sq.Ft. 0.0 Fast-Food Restaurant 0 2.90 Cu.F1.1Mo.15q.Ft. 0.0 Hotel 0 2.90 Cu.Ft.1Mc.lRoom 0.0 Manufacturing Uses Sq.Ft. Cu.Ft.of Nat.Gas Variable Cu.Ft,/Day Industrial Park 0 4.70 Cu.Ft.1Mc.l9q.Ft. 0.0 Manufacturing 0 4.70 Cu.Fll.1Mo.l9q.Ft. 0.0 General Light Industry 0 4.70 Cu.Ft.1Mo.l9q.Ft. 0.0 Warehouse 1 0 1 4.70 1 Cu.PLIMC.ISq.Ft. 0.0 Publicllnstitutional Use Sq.Ft. Cu.Ft.of Nat.Gas Variable Cu.Ft,lDay Publiollnstitutional 0 2.90 Cu.Ft.1Mo.1Sq.Ft. 0.0 Open Space 0 1 2.90 1 Cu.Ft.1Mo.l6q.Ft. 0.0 Total Daily Natural Gas Consumption(cubic feeVday) 91.3 Sources: South Coast Air Quality Management District,CEQA Air Quality Handbook.April 1993 UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 149 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 5: Water Consumption Project Units of Projected Component Measure Consumption Factor Consumption Residential Uses No.of Units Gals.of Water Variable Gals.lDay Single-Family Residential 5 390.00 GalsdDaylUnit 1,950.0 Medium density Residential 0 300.00 Gals.lDay/Unit 0.0 Multiple-Family Residential 0 234.00 GalsdDaylUnit 0.0 Mobile Home 0 234.00 GalsdDaylUnit 0.0 Office Uses Sq.Ft. Gals.of Water Variable Gals.lDay Office 0 0.30 GalsdDay/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Medical Office Building 0 0.30 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Office Park 0 0.30 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Bank/Financial Services 0 0.15 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Commercial Uses Sq.Ft./Room Gals.of Water Variable Gals.lDay Specialty Retail Commercial 0 0.15 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Convenience Store 0 0.15 GalsdDayl5q.Ft. 0.0 Movie Theater 0 0.20 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Shopping Center 0 0.50 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Sit-Down Restaurant 0 1.50 GalsdDay/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Fast-Food Restaurant 0 0.12 GalsdDay/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Hotel 0 187.50 GalsdDay/Room. 0.0 Manufacturing Uses Sq.Ft. Gals.of Water Variable Gals.lDay Industrial Park 0 0.30 GalsdDay/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Manufacturing 0 0.30 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 General Light Industry 0 0.30 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Warehouse 0 0.05 GalsdDayl5q.Ft. 0.0 Publicllnstitutional Use Sq.Ft. Gals.of Water Variable Gals.lDay Publicllnstitutional 0 0.12 Gals.10aylSq.Ft. 0.0 Open Space 0 1 0.12 1 GalsdDaylSq.Ft. 0.0 Total Daily Water Consumption(gallonslday) 1,950.0 Sources: Source:Derived from Las Angeles County Sanitation District rates(15Wa of effluent generation). UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 150 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 6: Sewage Generation Project Units of Projected Component Measure Generation Factor Consumption Residential Uses No.of Units Gals.of Effluent Variable Gals.10ay Single-Family Residential 5 260.00 Gals./Day/Unit 1,300.0 Medium Density Residential 0 200.00 Gals./Day/Unit D.0 Multiple-Family Residential 0 156.00 Gals./Day/Unit 13.0 Mobile Home 0 156.00 Gals./Day/Unit D.0 Office Uses Sq.Ft. Gals.of Effluent Variable Gals./Day Office 0 D.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Medical Office Building 0 D.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. D.0 Office Park 0 0.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Bank/Financial Services 0 DAD Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Commercial Uses Sq.Ft.IRooms Gals.of Effluent Variable Gals./Day Specialty Retail Commercial 0 0.10 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Convenience Stare 0 DAD Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Movie Theater 0 D.13 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Shopping Center 0 D.33 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 0.0 Sit-Down Restaurant 0 1.00 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Fast-Food Restaurant 0 0.08 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Hotel 0 125 Gals./Day/Room. 0.0 Manufacturing Uses Sq.Ft. Gals.of Effluent Variable Gals./Day Industrial Park 0 D.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Manufacturing 0 0.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 0.0 General Light Industry 0 D.20 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. D.0 Warehouse 0 D.03 Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Public/Institutional Use Sq.Ft. Gals.of Effluent Variable Gals./Day Publ,Wlnstitutional 0 DAD Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. D.0 Open Space 0 DAD Gals./Day/Sq.Ft. 13.0 Total Daily Sewage Generation(gallonsiday) 1,300.0 Source:Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 151 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•INITIAL STUDY&MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FIVE UNIT FAMILY HOMES EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA 91739 Table 7: Solid Waste Generation Project Units of Projected Component Measure Generation Factor Generation Residential Uses No.of Units Lbs.of Waste Variable Lbs.lDay Single-Family Residential 5 12.23 Lbs.lDay/Unit 61.2 Medium Density Residential 0 12.23 Lbs.lDay/Unit 0.0 Multiple-Family Residential 0 12.23 Lbs.lDay/Unit 0.0 Mobile Home 0 12.23 Lbs.lDay/Unit 0.0 Office Uses Sq.Ft. Lbs.of Waste Variable Lbs.lDay Office 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Medical Office Building 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 5q.Ft. 0.0 Office Park 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 5q.Ft. 0.0 Bank]Financial Services 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Commercial Uses Sq.Ft./Rooms Lbs.of Waste Variable Lbs.lDay Specialty Retail Commercial 0 42.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Convenience Store 0 42.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Movie Theater 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Shopping Center 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Sit-Down Restaurant 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Fast-Food Restaurant 0 42.00 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Hotel 0 6.00 Lbs.lDay/Room 0.0 Manufacturing Uses Sq.Ft. Lbs.of Waste Variable Lbs.IDay Industrial Park 0 8.93 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Manufacturing 0 8.93 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 General Light Industry 0 8.93 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Warehouse 0 8.93 Lbs.lDay11,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Publiclinstitutional Use Sq.Ft. Lbs.of Waste Variable Lbs.lDay Publicllnstitutional 0 4.00 Lbs.lDayl1,000 5q.Ft. 0.0 Open Space 0 3.00 Lbs.lDayl1,000 Sq.Ft. 0.0 Total Daily Solid Waste Generation 61.2 Source:City of Los Angeles CEQA Thresholds Guide,2006,and CitV of Los Angeles Average Solid Waste Generation Rates April 1981 UTILITIES WORKSHEETS PAGE 152 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD MITIGATION, MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD RANCHO CUCAMONGA CALIFORNIA 91739 RANCHO CUCAMONGA LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91130 REPORT PREPARED BY: BLODGETT BAYLOSIS ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING 2211 SOUTH HACIENDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 107 HACIENDA HEIGHTS, CALIFORNIA 91745 FEBRUARY 27, 2021 RNCH oo i PAGE 1 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 Overview of Proposed Project.............................................................5 2 Findings Related to Mitigation Monitoring.........................................5 3 Mitigation Measures...........................................................................5 4 Mitigation Monitoring...................................................................... ii PAGE 3 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM 1. OVERVIEW OF PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project involves the construction of five single-family home units on the eastern terminus of Arapaho Road within the northeastern portion of the City. The total gross land area would be 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres). According to the Tentative Tract Map No. 20152, the vacant land would be divided into six(6)lots. Lot 1 would be 25,910 square feet. Lot 2 would be 27,523 square feet.Lot 3 will be 20,005 square feet. Lot 4 would be 27,729 square feet. Lot 5 would be 20,452 square feet. Additionally, there would also be a Lot"A"that will be 7,256 square feet. The proposed project applicant is Leo Zhang, LRZT Inc.2738 Pepperdale Drive,Rowland Heights,CA 91748. 2. FINDINGS RELATED TO MITIGATION MONITORING Section 21o8l(a) of the Public Resources Code states that findings must be adopted by the decision- makers coincidental to the approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration. These findings shall be incorporated as part of the decision-maker's findings of fact, in response to AB-3180. In accordance with the requirements of Section 21o8l(a) and 21o81.6 of the Public Resources Code, the following additional findings may be made: • A mitigation reporting or monitoring program will be required; • Site plans and/or building plans, submitted for approval by the responsible monitoring agency, shall include the required standard conditions;and, • An accountable enforcement agency or monitoring agency shall be identified for the mitigations adopted as part of the decision-maker's final determination. 3. MITIGATION MEASURES Although parts of the proposed project site have been subject to disturbance to accommodate the existing structures, the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. As a result, the following mitigation is required to address the potential impacts on cultural resources: Mitigation Measure No.1 (Cultural Resources). The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kith Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot- holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 5 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measure No. 2 (Cultural Resources). Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15o64.5 [f])for historical resources.. Mitigation Measure No. 3 (Cultural Resources). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a"historical resource"or"unique archaeological resource",time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available.The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f)for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e., avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.4(Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b)for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.5(Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Mitigation Measure No. 6 (Cultural Resources). Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American.The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Mitigation Measure No. 7(Cultural Resources). If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation is designated MLD,the following treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe,the term "human remains" encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects that,as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Mitigation Measure No. 8 (Cultural Resources). Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches.Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes.Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains,funerary objects,sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 7 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. The analysis of potential impacts related to noise indicated that the residential uses located adjacent to the project site could potentially be impacted by construction noise. To ensure that the residential uses are shielded from construction noise,the following mitigation measures are required: Mitigation Measure No. 9 (Noise). Temporary noise barriers must be erected along the site's boundaries. These sound barriers will be designed to attenuate construction noise. We recommend plywood fencing or other sound attenuating materials like sound curtains (sound barriers can mitigate construction noise by 20-25 dBA). Mitigation Measure No. 10 (Noise). Demolition and construction activities shall be scheduled to the extent reasonably feasible so as to avoid operating several pieces of high noise generating equipment simultaneously. Mitigation Measure No. 11 (Noise). The project contractors must notify residents in the area regarding construction times and local contact information. This notice must be placed along the east side of the proposed project site and shall include the name and phone number of the local contact person residents may call to complain about noise. Upon receipt of a complaint,the contractor must respond immediately by reducing noise to meet Municipal Code requirements. In addition, all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City's Public Works Department. Mitigation Measure No. 12 (Noise). The project contractors shall use construction equipment that includes working mufflers and other sound suppression equipment as a means to reduce machinery noise. With implementation of the following mitigation measure, the proposed project's impacts upon LAPD services would be less than significant. Mitigation Measure No. 13 (Public Services). Temporary construction fencing shall be placed along the periphery of the active construction areas to screen as much of the construction activity from view at the local street level and to keep unpermitted persons from entering the construction area. Although parts of the proposed project site have been subject to disturbance to accommodate the existing structures, the project site is situated in an area of high archaeological significance. As a result, the following mitigation is required: Mitigation Measure No. 14 (Tribal Cultural Resources). The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleiio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot- holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Mitigation Measure No. 15 (Tribal Cultural Resources). Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin,the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources.Typically,the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Sectioni5o64.5 [f])for historical resources. Mitigation Measure No. 16 (Tribal Cultural Resources). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a"historical resource"or"unique archaeological resource",time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available.The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.5(f)for historical resources and Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e., avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.17(Tribal Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Public Resources Code Sections 21o83.2(b)for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 9 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.18(Tribal Cultural Resources). Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(i) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Mitigation Measure No. 19 (Tribal Cultural Resources). Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American,the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Mitigation Measure No. 20(Tribal Cultural Resources). If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe,the term"human remains"encompasses more than human bones.In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased,and the ceremonial burning of human remains.These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Mitigation Measure No. 21 (Tribal Cultural Resources). Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material.If the discovery of human remains includes four or more CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC.The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. 4. MITIGATION MONITORING The monitoring and reporting on the implementation of these measures, including the period for implementation, monitoring agency, and the monitoring action, are identified in Table 1 provided on the following pages. Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program Measure Enforcement Monitoring Verification A en Phase Mitigation Measure No.1(Cultural Resources).The Date: Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both Name&Title: approved by the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC.The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve City Building Prior to the ground disturbing activities.Ground disturbing activities are issuance of a defined by the Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Official Nation as activities that may include,but are not limited to, demolition permit. pavement removal,pot-holing or auguring,grubbing,tree (Applicant is removals,boring,grading,excavation,drilling,and trenching, Mitigation ends within the project area.The Tribal Monitor/consultant will responsible for when construction complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of implementation) is completed. the day's activities,including construction activities,locations, soil,and any cultural materials identified.The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Date: Mitigation Measure No.2(Cultural Resources).Upon discovery of any archaeological resources,cease construction Name&Title: activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed.All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified City Building Prior to the archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Official issuance of a Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation.If the demolition permit. resources are Native American in origin,the Gabrieleno Band • of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the (Applicant is Mitigation ends landowner regarding treatment and curation of these responsible for when construction resources.Typically,the Tribe will request reburial or implementation) is completed. preservation for educational purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and,if necessary, mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Section15o64.5[fl) for historical resources. MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table i Mitigation-Monitoring Program Measure Enforcement Monitoring Verification Mitigation Measure No.g(Cultural Resources).If a Date: resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a"historical resource"or"unique archaeological Name&Title: resource",time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures,or appropriate mitigation,must be available.The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.5(f)for historical resources and Public Prior to the Resources Code Sections 2Io83.2(b)for unique archaeological City Building resources.Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance)is the Official issuance of any preferred manner of treatment.If preservation in place is not 0 permits. feasible,treatment may include implementation of (Applicant is Mitigation ends archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the responsible for resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and when construction analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native implementation) is completed. American in origin shall be curated at a public,non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material.If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.4(Cultural Resources).Native Date: American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(i)as an inhumation or cremation,and in any state of decomposition Name&Title: or skeletal completeness.Funerary objects,called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a City Building Prior to the Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within Official issuance of a 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC) demolition permit. and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.Public Resources Code • Sections 21o83.2(b)for unique archaeological resources. (Applicant is Mitigation ends Preservation in place(i.e.,avoidance)is the preferred manner responsible for when construction of treatment.If preservation in place is not feasible,treatment implementation) is completed. may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material.If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Date: Mitigation Measure No.5(Cultural Resources).Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(i)as Name&Title: an inhumation or cremation,and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.Funerary objects,called associated Prior to the grave goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to City Building this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any Official issuance of any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately . permits. reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the (Applicant is coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the Mitigation ends coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native responsible for when construction American or has reason to believe that they are those of a implementation) is completed. Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program Measure Enforcement Monitoring Verification Agency Phase Mitigation Measure No.6(Cultural Resources). Date: Upon discovery,the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert Name&Title: work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone Prior to the around the burial.The monitor/consultant(s)will then City Building Official issuance of a notify the Tribe,the qualified lead archaeologist,and the . demolition permit. construction manager who will call the coroner.Work will (Applicant is • continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American.The discovery responsible for Mitigation ends is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further implementation) when construction disturbance.If the finds are determined to be Native is completed. American,the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Date: Mitigation Measure No.7(Cultural Resources).If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians—Kizh Nation is Name&Title: designated MLD,the following treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe,the term"human remains" encompasses more than human bones.In ancient as well Prior to the as historic times,Tribal Traditions included,but were not City Building Official issuance of any limited to,the burial of funerary objects with the • permits. deceased,and the ceremonial burning of human remains. (Applicant is • These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact.Associated funerary responsible for Mitigation ends objects are objects that,as part of the death rite or implementation) when construction ceremony of a culture,are reasonably believed to have is completed. been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Mitigation Measure No.8(Cultural Resources). Date: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location Name&Title: within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day,the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains.If this type of steel plate is not available,a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours.The Tribe will make Prior to the every effort to recommend diverting the project and City Building Official issuance of a keeping the remains in situ and protected.If the project • demolition permit. cannot be diverted,it may be determined that burials will (Applicant is • be removed.The Tribe will work closely with the qualified responsible for Mitigation ends archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated when construction carefully,ethically and respectfully.If data recovery is implementation) approved by the Tribe,documentation shall be taken is completed. which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches.Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material.If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created.Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 13 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program Measure Enforcement Monitoring Verification Agency Phase Date: Mitigation Measure No.9(Noise).Temporary Prior to the noise barriers must be erected along the site's City Building Official issuance of a Name&Title: boundaries.These sound barriers will be designed to • demolition permit. attenuate construction noise.We recommend plywood (Applicant is • fencing or other sound attenuating materials like sound responsible for Mitigation ends curtains(sound barriers can mitigate construction implementation) when construction noise by 20-25 dBA). is completed. Prior to the Date: Mitigation Measure No.io(Noise).Demolition City Building Official issuance of any and construction activities shall be scheduled to the • permits. Name&Title: extent reasonably feasible so as to avoid operating (Applicant is • several pieces of high noise generating equipment responsible for Mitigation ends simultaneously. implementation) when construction is completed. Date: Mitigation Measure No.11(Noise). The project contractors must notify residents in the area regarding Name&Title: construction times and local contact information.This notice must be placed along the east side of the Prior to issuance of proposed project site and shall include the name and Chief Building Official phone number of the local contact person residents . building permits. • may call to complain about noise.Upon receipt of a (Applicant is Mitigation ends complaint,the contractor must respond immediately by responsible for when construction reducing noise to meet Municipal Code requirements. implementation) is completed. In addition,all complaints and subsequent communication between the affected residents and contractors must be forwarded to the City's Public Works Department. Date: Chief Building Official Prior to issuance of Mitigation Measure No.12(Noise).The project • building permits. Name&Title: contractors shall use construction equipment that (Applicant is • includes working mufflers and other sound suppression Mitigation ends equipment as a means to reduce machinery noise. responsible for when construction implementation) is completed. Date: Name&Title: Mitigation Measure No. 13 (Public Services). Temporary construction fencing shall be placed along the periphery of the active construction areas to screen Chief Building Official Prior to issuance of as much of the construction activity from view at the and the Police Chief building permits. local street level and to keep unpermitted persons from • • entering the construction area. Thus, the proposed project would not result in the need for or provision of (Applicant is Mitigation ends new or physically altered governmental facilities the responsible for when construction construction of which could cause significant adverse implementation) is completed. environmental impacts, and police services impacts would be less than significant. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program Measure Enforcement Monitoring Verification Agency Phase Date: Mitigation Measure No.114(Tribal Cultural Name&Title: Resources).The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC's Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location.This list is provided by the NAHC.The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that Community During the project's involve ground disturbing activities.Ground disturbing Development Director grading and activities are defined by the Gabrielefio Band of Mission and the Chief construction Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include,but Building Official phases. are not limited to,pavement removal,pot-holing or 0 • auguring,grubbing,tree removals,boring,grading, (Applicant is Mitigation ends excavation,drilling,and trenching,within the project responsible for when construction area.The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily implementation) is completed. monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day's activities,including construction activities, locations,soil,and any cultural materials identified.The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed,or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Date: Name&Title: Mitigation Measure No.15(Tribal Cultural Resources).Upon discovery of any archaeological resources,cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed.All archaeological resources unearthed by project Community During the project's construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified Development Director grading and c archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by and the Chief construction the Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation.If Building Official phases. the resources are Native American in origin,the Gabrielefio Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall 0 coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and (Applicant is Mitigation ends curation of these resources.Typically,the Tribe will responsible for when construction request reburial or preservation for educational implementation) is completed. purposes.Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and,if necessary,mitigation takes place(CEQA Guidelines Sectiom5o64.5[f])for historical resources. MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 15 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program(continued) Enforcement Monitoring Measure A Verification Agency Phase Date: Mitigation Measure No.i6(Tribal Cultural Resources).If a resource is determined by the qualified Name&Title: archaeologist to constitute a"historical resource"or "unique archaeological resource",time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures,or appropriate mitigation,must be available.The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15o64.5(f)for historical resources and Public Community During the project's Resources Code Sections 2Io83.2(b)for unique Development Director grading and archaeological resources.Preservation in place(i.e., and the Chief avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment.If construction Building Official phases. preservation in place is not feasible,treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with (Applicant is Mitigation ends subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any responsible for when construction historic archaeological material that is not Native implementation) is completed. American in origin shall be curated at a public,non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material.If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Mitigation Measure No.17(Tribal Cultural Date: Resources).Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or Name&Title: cremation,and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.Funerary objects,called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native Community During the project's American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 Development Director grading and hours,the Native American Heritage Commission and the Chief construction (NAHC)and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed.Public Building Official phases. Resources Code Sections 2I083.2(b)for unique • • archaeological resources.Preservation in place(i.e., (Applicant is Mitigation ends avoidance)is the preferred manner of treatment.If responsible for when construction preservation in place is not feasible,treatment may implementation) is completed. include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis.Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public,non- profit institution with a research interest in the materials,such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum,if such an institution agrees to accept the material.If no institution accepts the archaeological material,they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table 1 Mitigation-Monitoring Program(continued) Enforcement Monitoring Measure A Verification Agency Phase Date: Mitigation Measure No.18(Tribal Cultural Resources).Native American human remains are Name&Title: defined in PRC 5097.98(d)(1)as an inhumation or cremation,and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness.Funerary objects,called associated grave Community During the project's goods in PRC 5097.98,are also to be treated according to Development Director grading and this statute.Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that and the Chief construction any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be Building Official phases. immediately reported to the County Coroner and • • excavation halted until the coroner has determined the (Applicant is Mitigation ends nature of the remains.If the coroner recognizes the responsible for when construction human remains to be those of a Native American or has implementation) is completed. reason to believe that they are those of a Native American,he or she shall contact,by telephone within 24 hours,the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Mitigation Measure No.ig(Tribal Cultural Date: Resources).Upon discovery,the tribal and/or Name&Title: archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and Community During the project's place an exclusion zone around the burial.The Development Director grading and c monitor/consultant(s)will then notify the Tribe,the and the Chief construction qualified lead archaeologist,and the construction Building Official phases. manager who will call the coroner.Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the • • remains are Native American.The discovery is to be kept (Applicant is Mitigation ends confidential and secure to prevent any further responsible for when construction disturbance.If the finds are determined to be Native implementation) is completed. American,the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission(NAHC)as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent(MLD). Mitigation Measure No.20(Tribal Cultural Date: Resources).If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians —Kizh Nation is designated MLD,the following Name&Title: treatment measures shall be implemented.To the Tribe, the term"human remains"encompasses more than Community During the project's human bones.In ancient as well as historic times,Tribal Development Director grading and c Traditions included,but were not limited to,the burial of and the Chief construction funerary objects with the deceased,and the ceremonial Building Official phases. burning of human remains.These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that • • remain intact.Associated funerary objects are objects (Applicant is Mitigation ends that,as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, responsible for when construction are reasonably believed to have been placed with implementation) is completed. individual human remains either at the time of death or later;other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. MMRP•FEBRUARY 27,2021 PAGE 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA•MITIGATION MONITORING&REPORTING PROGRAM FIVE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME UNITS•EASTERN TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD Table i Mitigation-Monitoring Program(continued) Enforcement Monitoring Measure Agency Phase Verification Mitigation Measure No.21(Tribal Cultural Date: Resources).Prior to the continuation of ground Name&Title:disturbing activities,the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects.In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day,the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains.If this type of steel plate is not available,a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours.The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected.If the project cannot be diverted,it may be determined that burials will be removed.The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated Community During the project's carefully,ethically and respectfully.If data recovery is Development Director grading and c approved by the Tribe,documentation shall be taken and the Chief construction which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes Building Official phases. and sketches.Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means (Applicant is Mitigation ends as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all responsible for when construction material.If the discovery of human remains includes implementation) is completed. four or more burials,the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete,a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC.The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains.Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags.All human remains,funerary objects,sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible.These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery.The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity.There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 A REQUEST TO ALLOW A REDUCTION IN THE REQUIRED LOT DEPTH FROM 200-FOOT TO APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET FOR TWO (2) LOTS OF A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE;AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Variance DRC2017-00786 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Variance request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 2 South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan .1 to 2 Units Per Acre and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Variance to allow a reduced lot depth for Lots 1 and 5 (the subject lots) of the proposed 5-lot subdivision; and f. Per Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, the required minimum lot depth for residential lots within the Very Low (VL) Residential District is 200 feet; and g. The proposed lot depth of the subject lots will be approximately 135 feet; and h. The proposed lot width of the subject lots will be approximately 190 feet,while the lot area of the two lots will be 25,732 square feet (Lot 1) and 23,615 square feet (Lot 5). 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulations would result in practical difficulty or unnecessary physical hardship inconsistent with the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed residential subdivision is an in-fill project with limited reasonable lot configuration options. The overall north to south dimension of the project site is approximately 331 feet. The project site is bound on all sides by existing development. Therefore, there is no opportunity to acquire additional land, specifically to the north or the south,which would allow Lots 1 and 5 to be greater in depth. Reducing the number of lots to allow for greater lot size is not reasonable as most of the proposed lots are already significantly larger than the minimum required for this development district; and b. That there are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to other properties in the same district. The project site is located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road approximately 200 feet east of the intersection of that street with Choctaw Place. The project site is bound to the north, south, and west by existing residential development and associated improvements. The extension of Arapaho Road will generally bisect the project site. Alternate alignments of the proposed extension such as shifting it further south or north are not possible because of the limits imposed by technical standards for street design including minimum dimensions for street width, curve radii, and cul-de-sacs. The project site was part of a larger parcel that was partially developed with a telephone switching facility on the east side. In May 2006, the larger parcel was subdivided into two (2)parcels. The part of the property that was developed with the telephone switching facility became a separate parcel, while the larger, undeveloped part of the property was sold to the current owner(the applicant). As the telephone facility occupies the entire smaller parcel, it was not possible at the time of the subdivision, nor is it possible now, to consider the option of a street connecting the project site with East Avenue that, in turn, could have provided the applicant the opportunity to propose an alternate subdivision design; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 3 C. That strict or literal interpretation and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties in the same district. The overall dimensions of the project site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). Requiring that all lots be 200 feet in depth would necessitate a re-design of the subdivision. This would cause a different set of challenges. All lots must have public street access and the extension of Arapaho Road will be an east to west direction. In order for the depth of each lot to be 200 feet, the long axis of all lots, i.e. the axis along where the lot depth is measured, also would have to be in an east to west direction. The only way to reasonably accomplish this would be to eliminate one of the lots. However, the result would be excessively large lots relative to the existing properties in the neighborhood and the development district in general. Furthermore,the orientation of the long axis would not match the long axis of the other properties within the existing residential development to the west that have primary frontage along Arapaho Road. This will affect the location of, or preclude altogether, improvements such as room additions and accessory structures as the setbacks would be oriented differently as well; and d. That the granting of the Variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district. The principal purpose of the minimum lot depth standard is to allow horse keeping, while still maintaining a minimum separation of 70 feet between horse corrals (or similar equestrian facilities)and dwellings on neighboring properties per Section 17.08.030(E)(2)(b)of the Development Code. The reduction in the depth of the subject lots from 200 feet to 135 feet will not be in conflict with this requirement as it will be offset by the width of each lot. Each lot will be an average of approximately 175 feet wide; the minimum lot width in this development district is 90 feet.The applicant has demonstrated on the plans that horse corrals can be plotted such that they are 70 feet from the residence on the adjacent lot. Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square foot in area, respectively, which will exceed the minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet applicable to the development district of the site; and e. That the granting of the Variance will not be detrimental to the public health,safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The reduced depth of the subject lots will not affect the neighboring properties and/or property owners. Practical differences in the physical attributes/characteristics between the lots in the surrounding area and the subject lots will be limited. Separation between structures and common property lines will be consistent with existing residential development within this development district. The overall area of Lots 1 and 5 will be 25,732 and 23,615 square feet, respectively, similar to the lot areas of the neighboring properties to the west at 13186 Arapaho Road and at 6323 Choctaw Place are 22,165 and 21,162 square feet, respectively. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 4 have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-27 VARIANCE DRC2019-00786 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 5 I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021 by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20152, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF APPROXIMATELY 146,429 SQUARE FEET (3.4 ACRES) INTO FIVE (5) LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south); and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan(.1 to 2 Units Per Acre)and Equestrian Overlay PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 2 d. The proposal is to subdivide the property into five (5) lots for single-family residential development; and e. All lots will comply with the development standards applicable to this zoning district as described in Figure 5-2 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, except for lot depth. The lot depth of Lots 1 and 5, which will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lot depths of Lots 2, 3 and 4 will be at least 200 feet. The width of each lot will meet the required 90-foot dimension. Individual lot areas will range between 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet, which are in excess of the minimum 20,000 square foot lot size. The minimum average lot area is 25,828 square feet,which is in excess of the minimum 25,000 square foot average lot size; and f. This application is in conjunction with Variance DRC2019-00786, to reduce the required lot size on Lots 1 and 5, and Minor Exception DRC2019-00787,to allow for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan,the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into five (5) lots for single-family residential development. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences on 0.5-acre lots or larger. The proposed lots range in size from 20,230 square feet to 31,940 square feet. b. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. C. The proposed development complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for the proposed lot depth of Lots 1 and 5 that will be approximately 135 feet in depth and will not comply with the minimum lot depth of 200 feet as required per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The applicant has submitted a Variance request for consideration by the Planning Commission. The proposed development, otherwise, meets all standards outlined in the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 3 a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission furtherfinds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-26 TTM SUBTT20152 —W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS May 12, 2021 Page 4 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2019-00787, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, ADJACENT TO LOTS 4 AND 5, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 5-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, WITHIN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0225-181-73. A. Recitals. 1. W&W Land Design Consultants filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2019- 00787 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a parcel located at the east terminus of Arapaho Road between East Avenue and Choctaw Place; and b. The application is related to Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20152 for the subdivision of 146,429 square feet (3.4 acres) into 5 residential lots; and C. The project site is a rectangular parcel with an overall area of approximately 3.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet deep (east to west) and 331 feet (north to south) and is currently vacant; and d. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 12, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* North Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* South Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* East Single-Family Residence/ Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Frontier Switching Station West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan(.1 to 2 Units Per Acre)and Equestrian Overlay e. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls) with a height of up to 8 feet adjacent to lots 4 and 5 within the subdivision; and f. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The Minor Exception is consistent with the General Plan any applicable specific plan or development agreement. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low (VL) Residential, and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with the existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or to accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space in the side yards between the house and the property line wall; and d. The granting of the Minor Exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787—W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 12, 2021 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQX), an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Blodgett Baylosis Env. Planning and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-28 ME DRC2019-00787 —W&W LAND DESIGN SERVICES May 12, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. All conditions of approval for Design Review DRC2014-00425 shall apply to SUBTT20152. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 3. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 4. Approval of Tentative Tract No. SUBTT20152 is granted subject to the approval of Variance DRC2019-00786. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 8. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 9. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 11. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. 12. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall not prohibit the keeping the equine animals where zoning requirements for the keeping of said animals have been met. Individual lot owners in subdivisions shall have the option of keeping said animals without the necessity of appealing to boards of directors of homeowners' associations for amendments to the CC&Rs. 13. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 14. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 15. Provide a 24-foot by 24-foot or 12-foot by 48-foot corral area in the rear yard adjacent to the Local Feeder Trail. Grade access from corral to trail with a maximum slope of 5:1 and a minimum width of 10 feet. 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 20. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. 21. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 22. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, 'slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 23. For single-family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 24. All site, grading, landscape, irrigation, and street improvement plans shall be coordinated for consistency prior to issuance of any permits (such as grading, tree removal, encroachment, building, etc.) or prior to final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision, or approved use has commenced, whichever comes first. 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. For residential development, return walls and corner side walls shall be decorative masonry. 27. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 28. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 29. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 30. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 31. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 32. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 33. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 34. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 35. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Arapaho Road frontage improvements shall be in accordance with "local" and Etiwanda Specific Plan standards as required and including A. Provide curb, gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, signing and striping and drive approaches. B. Street lights shall be owned by the City. Developers shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs to provide power on City owned street lights. Coordinate with City staff for design and installation requirements. C. Drive approach shall be in accordance with City Driveway Policy. 2. All driveway approaches shall be constructed per City Standards and City Policy. 3. Prior to the approval and recordation of the final map, CC&R's shall include the maintenance of the cross-lot drainage systems to be maintained by a homeowners association. 4. The final map shall delineate the private cross lot drainage easements. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 5. On East Avenue, the existing under sidewalk drain near the Frontier Communications facility which discharges storm water flow from the south side of Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 16969 shall be reconstructed to City Plan No. 107-C. Street plan revisions shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval for this street improvement. On Arapaho road, the proposed under sidewalk drain for Lot 1 shall be City Plan No. 107-B. 6. The street lights shall be owned by the City. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. 7. Prior to the approval of the final map, or issuance of a grading permit, the vehicular access to private local trails shall be from Local Streets. To prevent vehicles on local trails from entering a Community Trail, provide step-through per Std. Dwg. 1007 Standard Conditions of Approval 8. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests necessary to construct the required public improvements, and if he/she should fail to do so, the developer shall, at least 120 days prior to submittal of the final map for approval, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Government Code Sections 66462 and 66462.5 at such time as the City decides to acquire the property interests required for the improvements. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City if the City decides to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security for a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the City, at developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. This condition applies in particular, but not limited to: PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT. 9. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 10. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 11. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 12. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 13. Adequate provisions shall be made for acceptance and disposal of surface drainage entering the property from adjacent areas. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Susan Shaker, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 15. Prior to approval of the final map, a deposit shall be posted with the City covering the estimated cost of apportioning the assessments under Assessment District among the newly created parcels. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1 and SLD 7. 16. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 17. Prior to finalization of any development phase, sufficient improvement plans shall be completed beyond the phase boundaries to assure secondary access and drainage protection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Phase boundaries shall correspond to lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. 18. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 19. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, traffic signing, street name signing, traffic signal conduit, and interconnect conduit shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. Signal conduit with pull boxes shall be installed with any new construction or reconstruction project along major or secondary streets and at intersections for future traffic signals and interconnect wiring. Pull boxes shall be placed on both sides of the street at 3 feet outside of BCR, ECR, or any other locations approved by the City Engineer. Notes: 1) Pull boxes shall be No. 6 at intersections and No. 5 along streets, a maximum of 200 feet apart, unless otherwise specified by the City Engineer. 2) Conduit shall be 3-inch pvc with pull rope or as specified. e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. 20. Install fiber optic conduit, vaults, and manholes on Arapaho Road per Standard Drawings 135-137. Public improvement plans shall show the location and limits of the conduits, vaults and manholes with construction notes. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Arapaho Road Botanical Name: Lagerstroemia indica 'Muskogee' Common Name: Crape MyrtleMin. Grow Space: 2' Spacing: 20' O.C. Size 15 gallon Qty. 5 minimum Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 22. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 23. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 24. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 25. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 26. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. 27. Reciprocal access easements shall be provided ensuring access to all parcels by CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 28. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The assessment districts the project will join are LIVID 7, SLD 1, and SLD 7. 29. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall obtain written permission from the adjacent property owner(s) to construct wall(s) on property line(s) or provide a detail(s) showing the perimeter wall(s) to be constructed offset from the property line. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 10. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer or his designee.. 11. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 12. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 13. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 14. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 15. The proposed on-site wastewater treatment (septic) system (OWTS) shall be located in the front yard to allow a future connection to a public sewer main. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. DESIGN ISSUE; The average high ground water level for the subject property is 265-feet below the surface of the ground. Therefore prior to the issuance of any grading and/or building permit, the applicant shall provide, as a project condition of approval, a separate Private On-Site Wastewater Treatment (septic) System (OWTS) plan showing the maximum depth of any proposed seepage pits to be a minimum 10-feet above the average high ground water level. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 19. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter, and all cross-lot concrete V-ditches. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 20. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to acquire any required off-site drainage acceptance easements(s) from adjacent downstream property owner(s) or discharge flows in a natural condition (concentrated flows are not accepted) and shall provide the City Engineer, or his designee, a drainage study showing the proposed flows do not exceed the existing flows prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. This condition of approval specifically applies to the storm water draining through the existing Frontier Communications facility. 21. The site shall be rough graded to eliminate all cross-lot drainage, (except in approved facilities adjacent to private trails, or private cross lot drainage easements shown on the final map). All slopes and retaining walls necessary to accomplish this shall be installed prior to final map approval. 22. Flow lines steeper than 6 percent could be erosive. The applicant shall provide hard lined gutters and swales where concentrated flows exceed 3fps, and anywhere that flow lines exceed 10 percent. This shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan prior to issuance of a grading permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 23. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the storm water run-off will not adversely affect the downstream properties and that the water may legally discharge to the downstream properties. The engineer of record shall show on the final permitted grading and drainage plan one (1) or more of the following items are met: a) There is sufficient downstream capacity to accept the proposed storm water flows and that the downstream property owner have provided permission to accept the upstream storm water flows; b) a legal document/entity exists allowing developed storm water flows to be discharged to the property lower in elevation; c) a storm drain system to safely convey the storm water flows to a public storm drain system without causing flooding to adjacent property(ies). 24. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution 92-17, if a lot may not directly drain off-site directly to the street or other acceptable drainage device (such as a drainage ditch adjacent to an equestrian trail), then: a) drainage may flow from only one lot onto only one other lot; b) a drainage easement shall be provided over the lot accepting the drainage; c) the drainage shall be contained within either a concrete/rock lined swale/channel or a reinforced concrete pipe; and d) the drainage shall be designed with excess capacity to account for the probable lack of necessary maintenance, therefore, it shall be designed to convey two (2) times the runoff from a 100-year storm event with the minimum diameter of the pipe being 12-inches. 25. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 26. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 27. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 28. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment devices and best management practices (BMP) as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the approval of the Water Quality Management Plan. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 29. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer, or his designee, and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. Reciprocal access easements for all parcels and maintenance agreements ensuring joint maintenance of all storm water quality structural/treatment best management practices (BMP) devices, as provided for in the project's Storm Water Quality Management Plan, shall be provided for by CC&R's or deeds and shall be recorded prior to the issuance a grading permit. Said CC&R's and/or deeds shall be included in the project site specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) document prior to approval of the WQMP document and recording of the Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan. 32. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 33. The Homeowner's Association (HOA) shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 34. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 35. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 38. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 39. The subject project, shall accept all existing off-site storm water drainage flows and safely convey those flows through or around the project site. If existing off-site storm water drainage flows mix with any on-site storm water drainage flows, then the off-site storm water drainage flows shall be treated with the on-site storm water drainage flows for storm water quality purposes, prior to discharging the storm water drainage flows from the project site. NOTE: This specifically occurs along the north tract boundary adjacent to the Community Trail. This project shall not cause flooding on the adjacent Community Trail, and shall have a design shown to accept any off-site upstream storm water flows. 40. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 41. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 42. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". Note: As this project has been previously graded and the site soils have been compacted for building pads, the use of the Custom Soil Resource Report for San Bernardino County Southwestern Part by the United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service for natural soils is not acceptable for soil groundwater infiltration rates. Note: A current infiltration report will be required for this project as the project has been rough graded under a previous permit. 43. Prior to the issuance of a rough or precise grading permit, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference, a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the City Engineer, or designee, for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 44. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit for this development, the applicant shall provide to the City Engineer, or his designee, for reference a copy of the separate On-site Wastewater Treatment System (OWTS) plans for reference with the submittal of the precise grading plan. The separately permitted OWTS shall be submitted to the Building Official for review and permitting. The OWTS shall meet the requirements of adopted Local Agency Management Program for On-Site Wastewater Treatment Systems (LAMP OWTS), effective September 17, 2018 which will require site specific percolation testing which may reduce the required seepage pit depth. A copy of the LAMP OWTS is available on the Building and Safety webpage. 45. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 46. Prior to the approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall show the locations of the equestrian corrals which meet the City's current Development Code requirements. Each equestrian corral shall have a storm water (BMP) provided to treat storm water runoff from the corral. 47. The proposed storm water BMP infiltration basin is showing an overflow pipe along the southside of the project. The project drainage (hydrology/hydraulics) study shall provide hydraulic calculations for the pipe. The pipe shall also be shown in a plan and profile view on the permitted grading plan set showing a water surface profile gradient. The pipe shall be capable of withstanding H-10 vehicle loads. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20152 DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787, DRC2019-00971 Project Name: Arapaho Road - 5 Lot Subdivision Location: 6334 EAST AVE - 022518173-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map Minor Exception, Sign Permit Notice of Filing, Variance ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/24/2021 Page 17 of 17 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA �l DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. File numbers: SUBTT20334; DRC2020-00139; DRC2020-00141; DRC2020-00140. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: Approve Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, Design Review DRC2020-00139, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140 through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Subdivision of 4.21 acres of land into 17 lots for residential development and 4 "lettered" lots for open space purposes, the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for additional wall height due to on-site grades, and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of up to 129 trees. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: A. Site Characteristics: The undeveloped project site is located on the east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street. The site is approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line. The existing grade elevation is approximately 1,491 feet along the north property line and 1,477 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 14 feet. Onsite vegetation includes native and non-native grasses and a eucalyptus windrow along the north and south property lines. The public right-of-way improvements along both East Avenue and Golden Lock Place have not been installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan&Equestrian Overlay District(.1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre) ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant is requesting to subdivide (SUBTT20334) 10.24 acres of land located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The "lettered" lots (A-D) will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail) and will be maintained by a homeowner's association. Access to the residences will be provided by a new public street that will connect East Avenue to Golden Lock Place. The applicant proposes developing the project site using the optional development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards permit up to 2 dwelling units per acre, which is the same maximum density permitted under the basic development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards allow for smaller lot sizes in exchange for providing additional common open space area (minimum 25 percent of the net project site). The project will provide 25.7 percent common open space including citrus groves on lettered lots A, B, and D, and an open grass area with bench seating on Lot C. The project will provide 67.1 percent total open space, which includes both private and common open space areas, exceeding the 65 percent required total open space. Both the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan require that residential projects within the Equestrian Overlay District provide trail connections. The proposed equestrian trail will provide an east-west trail connection between East Avenue and Golden Lock Place. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below. Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses B. Design Review DRC2020-00139: The project includes the design review of the residences on the 17 proposed lots. The Etiwanda Specific Plan requires that projects with 11-20 units provide a minimum of 3 different floor plans and 3 elevations per floor plan. The project provides four (4) 2 separate floor plans (2 of which are reverse footprints) with three (3) different elevations for each floor plan, Spanish, farmhouse, and California Ranch (Plan 2 also includes 2 different color schemes per elevation). The Etiwanda Specific Plan allows reverse footprints to be counted as separate floor plans. The Development Code also requires that projects consisting of 4 or more units include a minimum of 25 percent single-story plans. The project includes 5 single-story floor plans. Each floor plan and architectural variation includes wall and roof plane articulation and carries the architectural design theme to each elevation (360-degree architecture). Each plan includes design elements that emphasize the chosen architectural style including the use of stone veneer, wood siding, exposed rafter tails, architecturally correct window and door surrounds, window shutters, wrought iron accents, and tile roofs. The plans include the use of decorative garage and front entry doors that emphasize the architectural style. Plan #1 is single-story with 3,511 square feet of living area and a 672 square foot 3-car garage. Plan #2 is two-story with 4,413 square feet of living area and a 908 square foot 4-car garage. C. Minor Exception DRC2020-00141: The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden walls with open fencing on top of retaining walls) with a maximum calculated height of up to 8 feet. The additional wall height is necessary due to onsite grades. The findings of facts below support the necessary Minor Exception findings, which are required by Section 17.16.110(E) of the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Fact/s: The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low and the zoning of the property is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site. Finding: The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. Fact/s: The Minor Exception for additional wall height will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots. Finding: The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. Fact/s: The proposed walls will be located where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space. Finding: The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. 3 Fact/s: The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. D. Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140: The project includes the removal of up to 129 trees including live, standing dead, and stumps. An Arborist Report (Jim Borer, March 2, 2021) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees except for four (4) existing street trees should be removed. The Landscape Plan for the project includes the planting of 236 trees including replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines. E. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant conducted 2 (two) separate Zoom online neighborhood meetings related to the project, on October 15, 2020, and January 26, 2021. Two separate meetings were required due to the project street design changing from a cul-de-sac to a through- street. The intent of the meeting was to invite property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project boundaries for input related to the project. Approximately six (6) neighbors attended the first meeting and 8 (eight) neighbors attended the second meeting. The applicant presented the project and addressed the neighbor's questions related to design, walls, construction timing, and estimated home prices. F. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed and approved as presented by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca and Williams) on March 16, 2021. Staff presented an overview of the project and subsequently the Committee recommended the project move forward for full Planning Commission review as proposed. G. Trails Advisory Committee: The project was reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on March 10, 2021. Staff presented the project and afterwards the Committee received comments from the one resident in attendance who raised issues related to the use of the Optional Development Standards as described in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The resident stated that they were opposed to the use of these standards as it would eliminate the possibility of keeping horses. He also stated that the Etiwanda Specific Plan required a 20-foot wide greenway for all projects using the optional standards. The Committee was generally in support of the project and only raised two issues related to the proposed private equestrian trail as follows: • That the step-through gates at each end of the trail should have a minimum of 36 inches between the wood bollards for easier equestrian access. • That a condition of approval should be included with the project approval that states that the proposed equestrian trail cannot be blocked permanently for any purpose. The applicant stated that they would increase the dimension of the trail easement to be 20 feet wide (including a landscape area adjacent to the equestrian trail) to comply with the greenway standard. The plans before the Planning Commission reflect the widening of the easement along the south property line (which includes the trail) to comply with the 20-foot-wide greenway requirement in the Etiwanda Specific Plan. A condition of approval has been included requiring that the step-through gates shall have a minimum 36-inch separation between the wood bollards. 4 H. AB52 Tribal Consultation: Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on September 9, 2020, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. I. Public Art: The project is exempt from the public art requirement which does not apply residential subdivisions with a density of equal to or less than four dwelling units per acre. CEQA DETERMINATION: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. (March 24, 2021) and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures Staff received a letter from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) dated April 21, 2021, raising three issues related to biological resource section of the MND. CDFW recommended the rewording of one mitigation measure related to nesting birds and the addition of new new mitigatation measures related to the San Bernardino kangaroo rat and the wesltern mastif bat. Staff has updated the Mitigation Monitoring Program with the updated language and new mitigation measures. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Council Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement) by developing an infill parcel of land. The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Very Low, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan zoning designation for the subject property is Low Residential (VL) Residential District. The proposed subdivision will create 17 single-family residential lots consistent with the underlying land use designations and compatible in size and configuration with the residential development in the surrounding area. FISCAL IMPACT The project site currently is assessed an annual property tax. A percentage of this annual tax is shared with the City. The proposed development will increase the value of the project site and the City's annual share of the property tax will increase accordingly. The project proponent also will be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 5, 2021, the property was posted on April 7, 2021, 5 and notices were mailed to 86 property owners within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 7, 2021. No comments have been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Location Map Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Exhibit C - Design Review Committee Comments dated March 16, 2021 Exhibit D - Trails Advisory Committee Comments dated March 10, 2021 Exhibit E - Initial Study Parts I, II, and III Exhibit F - California Department of Fish and Wildlife Letter dated April 21, 2021 Draft Resolution 21-25 of Approval for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334 Draft Resolution 21-32 of Approval for Design Review DRC2020-00139 Draft Resolution 21-34 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140 Draft Resolution 21-33 of Approval for Minor Exception DRC2020-00141 Conditions of Approval 6 Banyan St Banyan St Banyan St Banyan St E m 0 d o n m D < o rD � White Fir Ct v Brittle Brush Court m m m A Project Site o L N p r n o 1 0 F Blue Gum Dr :2 e GUtn Or o BtU �+ fD Wild Maple Court >eGJmpt 3 m o` v m U D 0 < o m M r 0 0 Cassia st v Exhibit A /� r f:vncum Dri �.f 6�1O _ ' ■ , / i � . _ 1 SHEET INDEX: r ' :cartz � :� .,, • CIVIL: r- - - C 1 SITE UTILIZATION (COLORED AERIAL WITH SHEET INDEX) - C-2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP C-3 STREET SECTIONS Ilk j • ► C-4 DETAILED SITE PLAN - C-5 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN t j �1°III'lll'luu�l Illlil� •. .. • ,. - C-6 GRADING SECTIONS IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIilllllllll� :, Y C-7 CONCEPTUAL WALL PLAN - • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIII-� � ,■ � � .. --' ''' �iiiiiiiluilllllll I r �,�_ C-8 CUT/FILL SHEET (COLOR) 7, T C-9 PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN r -mw-- r C-10 PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY MAP - r L i+fzi C-11 SITE PHOTOS -- •, lobs LANDSCAPE: - L �► ' . ' . L-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN - TITLE SHEET _ i • �- �� L-2 & L-3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN, SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS � � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII f� I ■ ■ ,� � � ''l p' I I ,f� �� � - � • F _ i L❑ ❑Y❑ICAL FRON ❑ YARD ❑LAN ❑ING ❑ SI ❑E DE❑AILS � • IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � � lit "-� ARCHITECTURE: TITLE SHEET AI : - : - e - d w A1 .0 PLAN 1 - FRONT ELEVATIONS (COLORED) I� A1 .1 PLAN 1 A - SPANISH FLOOR PLAN - ? - A1 .2 PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN OPTIONS '�J-PARCEL PMB 62-21-2 ■ • • A1 .3 PLAN 1 A - SPANISH FRONT ELEVATION & ROOF PLAN (COLORED) • 15 14 13 12 11 10 LOT ' '' A1 .4 PLAN 1A - SPANISH BUILDING ELEVATIONS (COLORED) • " • � r A1 .5■ • • ■ PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA RANCH FLOOR PLAN A1 .6 PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA RANCH FRONT ELEVATION & ROOF PLAN (COLORED _ A1 .7 PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA RANCH BUILDING ELEVATIONS (COLORED) A1 .8 PLAN 1C - FARMHOUSE FLOOR PLAN �+� �' ' ' , • , • • A1 .9 PLAN 1 C - FARMHOUSE FRONT ELEVATION & ROOF PLAN (COLORED) �` ■ A1 .10 PLAN 1 C - FARMHOUSE BUILDING ELEVATIONS (COLORED) III' � � • • [ � � � � �•� � '. I!II S _'� A2.0 PLAN 2 - FRONT ELEVATIONS M - R .. ' '� ��� II �' A2.0.1 PLAN 2 - FRONT ELEVATIONS '` "�,► "'''" _ - }:_�. +� f A2.1 PLAN 2A - SPANISH FLOOR PLAN Aa ❑ ❑LAN ❑ []FLOOR ❑LAN O❑IONS Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑A ❑S❑ANIS❑ FRON ❑ ELE❑A❑IONS ❑ ROOF ❑LAN '" _ - �► Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑A ❑S❑ANIS❑ ❑ ❑ILDING ELE❑A❑IONS Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑❑ ❑CALIFORNIA RANC❑ FLOOR ELAN w r _ P Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑❑ ❑CALIFORNIA RANC❑ FRON ❑ ELE❑A❑ION ❑ ROOF ELAN -. Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑❑ []CALIFORNIA RANC❑ ❑ ❑ILDING ELE❑A❑IONS � � �. � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII � �'� . • t Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑C ❑FARM❑O❑SE FLOOR ❑LAN + '#' i �' "� • Aa❑ ❑LAN ❑C ❑FARM❑O❑SE FRON ❑ ELE❑A❑ION ❑ ROOF ❑LAN Y_ -•- kY : - ' Aa❑❑ ❑LAN ❑C ❑FARM❑O❑SE ❑ ❑ILDING ELE❑A❑IONS r . III IIIIIII��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ' A ,,. •� - y+s�. � r- ' - .� �: ' "- • LEGEND 'r GeV �� •" _ ■ '# (SP-E) ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN 100 V L VERY LOW DENSITY PREPARED FOR: � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �� � -,. -= ESTATE RESIDENTIAL ,. ,:t • ., ,� MANNING HOMES ' _ ` ' -.� ' ■ �, ,,,,,,,,,, 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 '• '�. ,''- T F r . �} JUNIOR � • c G 11 NIOR HIGH SCHOOL NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 -�-y - JHS CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TEL: (949) 250-4200 �. - � .._. �., ;. � - --- --- --- . W_-�._- - --_- ---�_-- --- - -, •� .ws• .. • _ PREPARED BY: 1� s. a.- - ma ' .. �rJ� • � 'ter '• �., ; SOURCE : CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING MAP MA D O L E 9302 PUSBURM AVE,SURE 230 100 50 0 100 200 MAMICIA,Ck 9D30 (ADAPTED: JULY 181 2012) . RANCHO C;UMAE:909.4816322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX- 909.481.6320 ET I WAN DA SPECIFIC PLAN 0 TENTATIVE TRACT NO . 20334 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 coSITE TILI ATION MAP I I 20334 SUBTTN 0 z DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q SHEET U [I] OF 11 w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w GENERAL INFORMATION 15. ALL SLOPES WILL BE A MAXIMUM OF 2:1, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCORPORATION BY OWNER WILSON AVENUE APPROVED, INCLUDING PRIVATE SIDE YARD SLOPES. THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO REFERENCE MANNING HOMES 1. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN VL 16. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS: 0225-191-09 AND 0225-191-17 CUCAMONGA, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 2. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 17. ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THESE APPROVALS REFLECT THE PLANS, STANDARDS, AND POLICIES NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 Z Z ;�o 3. EXISTING ZONING: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN VL CUT 37,176 CY WHICH WERE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF ACCEPTANCE OF THIS CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA EXPORT : BALANCE SITE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION. IT IS INTENDED THAT THE DEVELOPMENT 4. PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN VL FILL 37,17E CY LOT 3 AND 4, BLOCK "F", AS SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY MAP OF THE TEL: (949) 250-4200 ETIWANDA COLONY LANDS, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF AUTHORIZED BY THIS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BE CARRIED OUT IN 5. PROPOSED LAND USE: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 18. THE PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL/SOILS REPORT WAS PREPARED BY LEIGHTON AND SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 2, CONFORMANCE WITH THESE DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS, UNLESS e Z 6. PROPOSED ZONING: ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN VL ASSOCIATES, INC., DATED JUNE 10, 2020, PROJECT NO. 12696.002 UTILITIES 7. ADJACENT LAND USES: NORTH: EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL AND VACANT 20. STREET WITHIN TENTATIVE TRACT 20334 WILL BE PUBLIC PAGE(S) 24 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID AMENDED BY THE DEVELOPER. BANYAN STREET � COUNTY. WATER/SEWER CABLE SOUTH: VACANT 21. FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE = o Y EAST: EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELS THE NORTH 300.0 FEET OF APPLICANT CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS W PROTECTION DISTRICT 10440 ASHFORD STREET BLUE C W c_> WEST: EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SAID LOTS 3 AND 4. MANNING HOMES P.O. BOX 638 (877) 426-9117 O G� o a Q 22. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS AND AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE TO z DRIVE 4- 8. PARK REQUIREMENTS TO BE MET BY PARKLAND "IN-LIEU" FEES OR PARTICIPATION BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 7A OF THE CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE SECTION R337 OF ALSO EXCEPTING THE WESTERLY 190.00 FEET OF THE SOUTHERLY 100.00 FEET 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 0 �Q TELEPHONE IN OFF-TRACT PARK CONSTRUCTION THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 49-1. OF THE NORTHERLY 400.00 FEET OF SAID LOT 4. NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 (909) 987-2591 COX COMMUNICATIONS PROJECT 9. CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE PROVIDED BY: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA 23. ALL STORM DRAINAGE WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER PLAN OF THE APN: 0225-191-09-0-000 AND 0225-191-17-0-000 TEL: (949) 250-4200 GAS (877) 473-2013 SITE 10. SCHOOL DISTRICTS: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND APPROVED DRAINAGE PLAN FOR TTM 20334 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. 40 20 0 40 80 ELEMENTARY: ETIWANDA SCHOOL DISTRICTS 1981 W. LUGONIA AVENUE ELECTRIC STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY HIGH SCHOOL: CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 24. PAD ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON MAY BE ADJUSTED PLUS OR MINUS 1 FEET REDLANDS, CA 92373 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. 11. MULTIPLE FINAL MAPS MAY BE FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 66456.1 25. ALL IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA SHALL BE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE OF THE CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE. INSTALLED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ENGINEER. (909) 335-7715 FONTANA, CA 92336 12. DEVELOPER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MERGE LOTS ON THE FINAL MAP. 26. THIS/SITE IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA. A SITE (909) 357-6581 13.14. THISTISGANREES INSIDE APPLICATONTHE FOR AACT DEVELOPMENT PERMUNDARY WILL IT. PLAN REMOVED SPECPLANTFIC FIRE IS REQUIRED TOTION PLAN IS BE IN ACCORDANQUIRED FOR CE WITH FIREHIS DISTRIOCTECT. THE STANDARDI 49 PROTECTION VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 1494.9 p M �JgC� 1468.7 W • iz + 1484.4 1482.7 D o 1476.4 + 1495.4 1494.5 1493.5 1 p o o p Q �D� �96.2 1 1486.5 1480.5 �� 1478.8 � � 1457.3 __ [� � CS CS 1470.5 I --------- Tj _ - I I I / O V G�1�L�1 1466. • 1466.E ❑ ��OL E ❑R❑ ❑ _-_-- ---3497.7 \\ O 1 I I o I Q�] �Q I DEBRIS J 1489.5 �_ U ¢Uj z , „ 1477.1 1465.6_ ---- C) 1495 II 1494.3 I � L ME I _-z4�4�- --z�a�.� N 89°2602 E 1008.30�� ------- --- --- ----- --- --------+ --------- - -�- --- O❑R❑ + 1492.8 ❑ + 149 . r --- - --- �� , 7 1465.2 -------- - 828.09' - - - - - - - 14 5.3 o I WALL 1 14z.8 ® - - _ 10 .01 - 10 . 1 �1- .00 �- - - �II 6' LAR 11 0 76 + I I A D o� �TANK ❑ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---_ - - - - 1465.2 - - - --- 14 .3 I - - �4876 PROPS 6'_H 1 1 + 49z 5 I 1492.8 + I LOCK WALL - I I o I 479.5 + I I - � 0 REE IG 1493.4 �' �LSL/0 I �1488.4 1484.4 - 1482.6+ + 14+ I 1476.2 14 149 I I � I I I I I I 1481.6 + 7 7 I I 1474.4 I + - I 1 1487 3, . - i �� I ❑ 1 p 1488.5 + + �Dc I I I 1481.4 11J I I 1467.2 III w I 1 II Is 1471 I 1489.7 o I I+ � 1483 5 1 1 - 1482.5 I I + 14�9.7 +1477.5 I 1475.E I / I5 I twN 1490.5 I ❑ �❑ CONC 17 / I 1 + + + i -� + I I 1473.E 14726 + _ I� 11 14 � 1 / 2 III 1 + -III M z 463 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-- I I � 1 i 11 ADDITIONAL + 1490.6 - �,2 , » 1489. 1486.5 I I 1 1 I 1479.6 1472.5 1 1 q �6, DEDICATION 1 8'1 1483.E rn + 1480.6 + I I 1477.7 I 1475.6 1 + I 1 1469.6 1 - .53 1 1 + + 1 I + I + 4�3.6 1470.6 + + 1461.7 12 2 2' 0' w� 48 488 ROPOS I I ,/ 11481.E _- + I / + + �1 „ � 48l BLOCK W L - � -"� I � - �I o5 ' 486 . �-I- I I ��� � I E 7G>�AC 7 oo 92' II -� 11 `� 1 .1 ' 1468.6+ P' DEBR 1 1481. I 14 4 ° 0 I � + 1 1478.5 4 1475.4 I 1473.E I I /' I I I 1463.4 483 115.1 + i 104.00 103.00 102.00 + 02.00 + .00' 102.00' 1470.3 102.00' 6 85' + 1 1 61. �] o 7C�5 1486.5 1484.4 14 I - � ..A.. S❑REE❑ N 0 ° 1484.4 (PUBLIC) - �' ^I 8„S_ »W - „00 z N 1 11 1460.7 I1485.5 zi , 7 102.00' 102.00' 1 . 0' 1 102.00' I 02.00' 102.00' 102,00' 102.00' - 102.00' I 14' i I tio� / II 1 ly I I I 1466.3 1 �48 1483.4 I 1480.3 1478.E 1 1469.5 / 7468.5 ----------- 1434.2 + + + - 1475.5 1 7 5 1 1470.5 + i + 1481.E - I + kl + I - i 1472. 1485.5 _ I 11 + 1 / +1476.5 �1 + + _ + j WALL 11 l i 1 1 -Ln ICN ^ 4E.8 1 � I 1 1472E I C 3. 148�0 1 1481.5 2 I 1 is I I 1473 5 1 1470.4 I V I J ^ J 1483.4 14� 6 /� + /� I 1467.3 1465.6 I -� + � �1 +1479.4 � I I 14776 � 1 � I �� I _� - - � I + I I, -� 1 1 1 / 14 E I N, m I + 4 S REEF LIGHT 88 / / I " " I ``' I { 1 1 1 1 I� + I 1 1 1 LOT C �9.� I +1455.5 0 44 44 I � 479.5 I I I � I I I � 1 I 1 I � 148ss �1 71. I CI \ +14s9.3 �� �I I� CONC 32 32 1481.5 1480.4 1477.3 I��' 1474.5 I 1458.5 14657 1 / 1472.E w + 1469.8 I + 11 1466.3 1 I v z 1481. ExISTIN( R/w + + 1475.s + 1 + L ` V 7 a I I PER MB 21/24 ' F� + r --� �/ � -� �_ �ZEE w � + I 1 11 1 � � �i w 1 /_ _ - 10305 .1458 6 I 1 I 1 1 ,-- 1 -6 . ----'� � 414 I L,) �H V I + I I - - - - - - = - _T472.� " - - - _ _ 1461.3 I 1455.4 + I I - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - / + + _ 14 .6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - 4 L... __ �4=..� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -+ - - - - - - - �+ 1 5 1485.E e - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - /1430.480, 5 93.1 ' 102.0 ' 10 .00' 102.00' 1 28.00' oo❑ 89°48'07" W R B RR�CrBOA- r - N '07" W DEBRIS 1 99.11' 44. 1 - _ - - DEBRIS HIGH Z I N o ° + +1476.4 p >w- �_ - ¢Z 1478.5 I 1477.1 �' 1473.4 z / + cn w ~ cwn 7 1474.5 N + w w 1472.3 1471.7 D O w N, _a z 1465.5 1464.4+ 1462.5 ¢¢ ❑L - + 0�25-1 (0 4576 w ¢ Cl w M +1476.9 + ww� of + 1469.5 + + in �¢m C> • ¢ � � N vQ� IJV� � � I 1 ®RI❑E N >480. 1 1477.4 I 14 .6 c� o ¢ 4 4 0 ¢ 1456.3 �7 + 14754 +1474.3 +1473.z o z �� 1471.5 1470.6 +1469.5 +1467.8 +1466.3 1464.7 +1463.4 1462.5 +1461.6 1453.5 1454.1 1453.4 + + + + + + + I 1467.3 452.6 a ------------- I I I 1467.E +1464.5 1479 +1473.3 +1472.4 1468.5 + + WILD MA❑LE 1469.E + 1465.5 7462.5 7467.5 1460.E 1475.E I • +1470.5 + + + + + ---- O 74, I I 1475.1 � o- s I I 1452 C O❑R❑ I+ A 4 1.6 PREPAR R: � I _ MANNING HOMES APH 0225-WH6 1 I LEGEND 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 �Q���� � �� � L EXISTING STORM DRAIN =-sD--- TEL: (949) 250-4200 CONTACT: CRAIGKOZMA I I EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM ----s----- TOTE][] TOTE][] 1 ' EXISTING RIGHT EXISTING WATER SYSTEM ----w----- ❑OT NO❑ ❑OT ❑R❑❑ ❑OT NO❑ ❑OT ❑R❑❑ PREPARED BY: PER PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SD (SF) (SF) ' PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM 6's ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ TRACT BOUNDARY PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM �1w ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 17 � MA D O L E s302 PRTSBURGH AVE,surrE 230 ❑ ❑❑z❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ' RANCHO CUCAMONGA,Ca W30 RETAINING WALL � ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ Engineering Communities for Life PHONE�:�.�� 6 HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH RETAINING ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑z❑❑ 11 (TO BE TED) 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL TUBULAR STEEL FENCE ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑z❑❑ i' PVC 2-RAIL FENCE ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑OT ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ TENTATIVE 1 Q " TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY -- ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑OT ❑ ❑1I❑❑ 1 _ PROPOSED 2:1 ❑ 2:1 - ❑❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑OT ❑ ❑❑�❑❑ TRACT 1 LETTERED STREET LOTS "q" ❑OT ❑ ❑❑z❑❑ NO . 1 --POD SED RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 � � PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT -�-� TOTAL LOT AREA : 275 397 SF { HT OF WAY STREET LIGHT O 1 � WATER OUALITY INFILTRATION - Lw� - AVERAGE LOT AREA : 167200 SFTENTATIVE TR CT MAP Z '� PIPE SYSTEM GROSS AREA : 10.24 AC PIPE-C - NET AREA : 9.74 AC e�°PRE %wq F o 76 � _ ,� _ � �1 0 4' SUBTT 20334 3 No. 36637 c z Exp: 06-30-22 * DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 ��9TFo 1 V DETAIL A WENDELL L. IWATSURU DATE CAL SHEET LILE OF 11 w SCALE: 1"=10' CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS EXISTING R/W PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS FUTURE � FUTURE ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS PROP. E'LY VARIES � W'LY R/W I R/W EXISTING EXISTING PROPOSED 28 48 R/W R/W R/W 76' 88 44' 2, 44' 44' EXISTING I 12' 22' ' 22' 20' LOT B SURFACE 7.5' 12 32 32 12 Of 4' 7.5 12' 4' 12' S2 I I 21'-32' 7.5' 4' 0.5' CU ` -—- AC PAVEMENT o % 0.5' PAD 2:1 MAX. EXISTING VARIES 1' 2:1 MAX. 2' 2-%MIN - 7� 1.7% o ; 2.0% CURB AND PROPOSED SLOPE F —_-__ ___ - /���/�/%A�� �'`'i SLOPE 1.7% 1.7% 2.0% �2 `�\�ii//i%j\%\\% _ ____ _ - � GUTTER -------------------------- AC PAVING \\\/\\/\\/\\/ L-- - --------- n \\\%\ \//\\//� ------ I - ---------------------------------------- -------------------------- FUTURE / EXISTING L-� ----------- _ SIDEWALK /% S FUTURE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER CONIC.& GUTTER SAWCUT AND REMOVE PROPOSED SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION EAST AVENUE EXISTING PAVEMENT CURB AND GUTTER GOLDEN LOCK PLACE AND AC BERM PUBLIC NOT TO SCALE SCALE 1"=5' T.I. = 6.0 ; R = 74 NORTH AND SOUTH OF PROJECT FRONTAGE 34' PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED EXISTING EXISTING R/W R/W R/W / TENTATIVE TRACT 28' 6' 42' TRACT NO. 17651 \ NO. 20334 FADDITIONAL DEDICATION LO 'D' I I 44' 12' 22' 22' 20' 5' 2' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 2 4 I 4' SAWCUT AND 7.5 12 2 R REMOVE EXISTING COMMUNITY TRAIL 2 I q PROPOSED PAVEMENT AND AC AC PAVING BERM II R 2.0% n �09� v 1.7% ---------------- _ - - ----------- --- - --- -- r �,- PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED EXISTING CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER GOLDEN LOCK PLACE PUBLIC SCALE 1"=5' PROPOSED PROPOSED R/W R/W 56' 30' 2' I 12' 18, 18, 8' I 2' 0.5' 4' 7.5' 2:1 MAX PAD PROPOSED SLOPE AC PAVING 2 0% 2:1 MAX 2_0� 1.7% 1.7% SLOPE �— PAD PROPOSED PROPOSED PROPOSED SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER CURB & GUTTER "A" STREET PUBLIC SCALE 1"=5' PREPARED FOR: MANNING HOMES 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TEL: (949) 250-4200 PREPARED BY: (#MADOLE WM NTMal JRC81 AVF-SURE 230 & ASSOCIA-rES, wwcwo cucnmaNGA cA 91M MOW 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX- 909.481.6320 TENTATIVE TRACT NO . 20334 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 ESS/ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NT o SUBTT 20334 r 3 No. 36637 c m Z * Exp: 06-30-22 * DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 a C 1 V WENDELL L. IWATSURU DATE F�PICA LIF� SHEET C=3 OF 11 Uj > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w LEGEND ,ol- TRACT BOUNDARY - - \1��u 6" CURB & GUTTER EXISTING STORM DRAIN =_-SD---=- TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY -- ..-- - --- - wlLsoN AVENUE J� EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM --- 8°s ---- PROPOSED 2.1 - _J -- - ---�-1�?� - �, Z 15' MIN P/L 15' MIN EXISTING WATER SYSTEM ---8"w---- STREET LOTS „A„ 1 ���� 1 \��°' ►�\ �, o \1� 1 w w K17 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM sD � N14 � ` 1 o � 1477.4 TG PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT � \11°' � 1477.4 TG �� 1475.9 INVLOT 11 LOT 12PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM 8^� ti /, 1476.4 INV BUILDING LINEPROPOSED WATER SYSTEM STREET LIGHT °- �� % 1 15.00' = 15.00' ,1477.5 TG �j �1 1 1477.5 TG 3 1 F d \� 1 0 j BANYAN STREET PROPOSED LOT NUMBER T7 1476.2 INV � 11416.2 INV GF=o 3 1478.0 FINISH MIN. 10' 5' 77 WATER QUALITY INFILTRATION - - �� 110'� 1478.20 's ° IF BUILDING LINE RETAINING WALL ( - - - - 1 15.30' 15.00' 2B 1 Hp FLOOR 8 MIN. 1 2:1 MAX. PIPE SYSTEM 1 1 1478.0 .. BLUE ' u 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH RETAINING �� �� 1477.8 2BR 1 1477.8 FF=1478.87 2p0y o� SLOPE • \\\ \ \ o Mq �2/o MIN. op �''(/ a 0- CD O Q 6 HIGH BLOCK WALL Hp FF=1479.07 HP 1477.E TG HP PAD=1478.20 \\>,;,;>> \X FINISH PAD=1478.40 i\i�i4ii \ 20y FLOOR DRIVE cD ¢ �� 1476.1 INV v vyv,,v, yvv� 11: 1477.4 TG 1 GF= 1 1 1477.4 TG 1 1417.4 TG - z ��%v% �7� 9 15.00' - ��v vv v IMIFPROJECT TUBULAR STEEL FENCE cly 1478.40 1 I 15.00' � - �� 20.0�_ .. • o 1476.0 IN - 1476.0 INV 1475.3 INV `� `- v vv vv� , ;�vvv,� Q PVC 2-RAIL FENCE ❑ ❑❑❑ NOT❑❑ 1 .30' 4 PVC, SCH 40 S=0.005 (MIN.) �I 1477.2 TG �, 1 1 +<+N+ 1411 '0 1475.9 INV v11� o SECTION Al I SITE SECTION 17.48.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT HOW TO MEASURE WALL HEIGHT ON THE �� 1 o 1477.0 TG TYPICAL SIDEYARD GRADING STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY ZZ THE PROPERTY LINE OF ADJACENT LOTS WITH DIFFERENT GRADES. ,rJ 6 I 10. 1h°' 1���° I 11�• 11 4 7�tj8 1475.1 INV z FENCE AND WALL HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FINISH GRADE AT THE BASE OF THE ``' 1� 1 �o � �o Fc �1 NTS FENCE OR WALL TO THE UPPERMOST PART OF THE FENCE OR WALL; EXCEPT WHEN THERE IS - - - - --- --- 1471.3 INV A DIFFERENCE IN THE GROUND LEVEL BETWEEN TWO ADJOINING PAECELS, THE FENCE OR WALL OUTLET TO "V" DITCH SHALL BE MEASURED AT THE MID-POINT OF THE RETAINING WALL HEIGHT AS MEASURED ON THE 6" CURB & GUTTER �G ���� --- SIDE 40 20 0 40 80 w� WITH THE LOWEST FINISH GRADE. SEE FIGURE 17.48.030-2 (MEASUREMENT OF FENCE AND 1�ti ��>> ❑ C N ❑Y MA❑ WALL HEIGHT ON PARCELS WITH DIFFERENT ELEVATION). LOTS 10 - 17 N.T.S. PROVIDE 1/2 BLOCK OPENING ��'�� v �'_' _ I �- o ° ° ° 14y4� TYPICAL LOT GRADING F� s 7498.4 1496.2 O 1496.3 1 1495.7 1496.6 + WITH SCREENING FOR IE + + SCALE: 1"=40' SECONDARY OVERFLOW LOTS 1 - 9 I � 1495.5 1 TYPICAL LOT GRADING \ I I 1494.9 P ° I SCALE: 1"=40' �� 1468. 1484.4 v rt.i -7 + O + 0 M 7494.5 R 1 + 0 Q Q d 1 1486.5 1480.5 Qcp +1477.5 +1476.4 1467.3 __------- -- +- - I I 149 LRJ �+ +1493.5 • o o o� 4 496.2 1 +1487.5 + + + + �� �2/-1 �8.8 1470.5 I \ o O � � "�' 1466. -------- I DEBRIS ❑ 7489.5 1 I 1466.6 ❑ [DELE ❑R❑S❑ 7 9 I 1494.3 F- 1465.6 1477.1 0❑R❑ 1492.8 U >_ ¢z + r n + A CAR " D + r l -``' R "V DIT - 00 X4 5.3 146�2 -------- I ° I WALL 149 I 1490.8 ® - TRACT BOUN Y 828.09' - - - - - - - - - - - 76. - - - - I -- ---- _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - 200' �l - / --------- I 115.24 - 104.01 - - -� - - - - - - - - _ - N- - - _ -� - �� - - - 102.01' ❑- - - - - - - - - �I 176.00� 1 �� 1465.2 o TANK ❑ �1l- - 1 - -103.01' - - 102.01' �, 102.0 1 �- - 6' HIGH TUBULAR - I IJ = 92.6 - - - - - - - _ - - - ❑- - - _ I - 1 1 PROPOSED 6' HIGH co oo 1 I o 1 I STEEL FENCE IL + 492.5 17 0o 16 N BLOCK WALL 15 o 14 o 13 0 � `� 1493.4 m ���0�1 N �' i� `� I �' i 12 11 "D 10 ❑ I i I I F W 15.00 15.00 I I I I I 49 o I I 60.07' I I 11 I I I117.00' I I I I I I I I I I I � o Z ❑ �,11 o J 7L:� 1489.7 1 19.18' 15.00' I 17.00' 15.00' 15.00' 17.00' 1 117.00' 15.00' 1 121.54' 10.451 1 n I ' CONC o 21.3 1 B I 118.00' 15.00 1 1 CR I I 3� I ~ FF=1485.77 I FF=1476.97 LOT D I 490.5 0 Z I 2CR FF=1470.67 PAD=1485.1 a' 13.2 2AR ^ I CD 2BR 111.8' PAD=1476.3 2A ] I U q 1 I ❑ 1 I w N o 16.3 °� ADDITIONAL 1 r" I '� 2C � 11.6' o 9•8 FF=1474.87 � 11.8' FF=1472.77 d- PAD=1470.0 $ 463.7 v, z FF=1483.37 �r FF=1479.07 �, �, �2 "' IILLL r 1489. r INLET GRATE I PAD=1482.7 12.8 FF=1481.27 PAD=1478.4 PAD=1474.2 PAD=1472.1 DEDICATION I � I I I ^ I I I I I � I I I I 2' 2 2' OF ❑ 89' 207.51 1 1 PAD=1480.6 I 1 I RI _ I I 17.00' 121.54 207.53 15.00' I 15.00' - 15.00' I I - _ - 0.45 I 0 o w� 489 488 PROPOS 30.01' _ 1 g 18° - 117.06' _ 15.00' F� o E 8 q81 BLOCK WALL 15.00' 1 118.00' J17.00' 15.00' �I15.00' �117.00 1 J f :x 486 II PROPOSE o o r o o / PARKWAY cD 1� o I o I o o o o I o I h� 1 484� II DRAIN o I / s1. 181.30' - 483 115.1,, 104.00' 103.00' o XISTING FIRE HYD�`NT D•1 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' � 152.85' � C�7 �]0 0 17651 I o � O gE RELOCATED) 1 _ 1 N °° W - � - - - - 8„S � _ - - a _ �. -8„W o 8„ z 1485 o I 1460.7 I I I 79.51 0 102.00 102.00 I 102.00' 1 102.00' 102.00'- 102.00' 102.00 102.00' 102.00_ 1 1 153.14 1 �tia o II o 0 1 0 1 0 \ o I o I o I o 1 I I I I ' ---- 8 cu O O O N 1 --_-----___ 4 I I II I 1 15.00' I I XISTING WATER METER BO L 15.00' 1 �" I I I I WIT _ 17.00' 15.00' j l 1 15.00' - 123.00' 10.00' I I I I I I I J o � 1485.5 TO gE REPIACED I - 17.00 15.00 _ _ - - 1 o TED BOXES 117.00' - 15.00 17.00' - - 15.00 1 - I 1 1 1 17.00' 17.00 15.00' �117.00' 15.00' 1 1 I I Q I W WALL I II II II c I I I ^ 1112.6' 2AR ^ I 2C 1 1 2B � I 10.0' ^ j I9.2' 2A ^ l ^ 11 11.0' 2B FF=1481.77 10.4' 12.0 10.4' 2CR M M �, I - - I I 1483.4 I i LOT `� 1 CR `� PAD=1481.1 FF=1479.97 FF=1477.87 1 A `D FF=1472.37 FF=1469.0715.00' I _ _ _ I I • PAD=1479.3 PAD=1477.2 PAD=1471.7 FF=1470.57 PAD=1468.4 o 4,0 1 FF=1482.47 FF=1475.87 1 1 PAD=1469.9 11 1 A I m l _ ❑ 8' 1 n PAD=1481.8 17.00' I 15.00' 15.00' 1 1 PAD=1475.2 1 1 15.00' 1 15.00' 1 1 FF=1466.97 I I PAD=1463.0 I I I I I 44' 1 A 17.00' 115.00' 17.00' I 15.00' PAD=1466.3 \ I +1455.5 44' I _ 1 17.00' 1115.00' h 7.00' 17.00' 117.00 - LLJ 1485.5 � I 15.00' I 11 123.00L \ / I = CONIC 1 32 32 I� II I 15.00' I 1o.0 2 CD z \ _ _i / XI N ST. LIG T Lr) 1 ICID I 3 N 4 _ 7 - 8 - - 9 --- 1 5 � ZL 6 LI I 1 0 BE RELOCATED I 11 1 `� - - o¢ I - 1 4 M II II - N � I W cV CV - + C � I� I� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IR POSED STREET I 1 - - - - - - 2:1 - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 4 2:1 I - � - - - - - 2:1 �- i 1485.E I �R ATI I 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IB Yy 93.1 ' 102.0 ' 10 .00' 102 0' 102.0 ' 102.00' 10 .00' 02.00' 102. ' 102.0 ' 176.00' J IN EXIS ING 28.00 9'48'07" W N '07" W DEBRIS 1 99.11' 7 I RM❑- o°o o R' B ACT BOUNDARY _ � - - - HIGH � 44.01 _ ¢ Z ~ �\ N - C- 0 0 i _ - 1 �477.1 m cn 1473.4 z ¢¢ _ + + o � z o w 146� �`'o c� N o 1464.4+ 1462.5 w w ~¢ Q m D o to z 1465.5 ¢ o ❑L 7 I co cn w 1472.3 1471.7 + OQ 225o 067.E w N¢ w o w O Q 1474.5 Q w M 0� I ¢ z wo '� � cnJ + + _ � ¢� o ww w 0 1 5 5 _ I 1476.9 + w w o Q 1469.5 o f = M I j � v z w o �A H7 Q �- ROP E[ OMBINATI I Q 1480. 14 f 1 14 z N • w ¢ � cv w N 1456.3 �I P C 2- IL FENCE z 1 + o Q 147340' 1466.3 /kr0� 1463.4 1461.6 MAXI M RETAINING Q � � �� 1474.3 Z o Z 1469.5 1467.8 1 1464.7 1462.5 1453.5 1 w I 1 w N U +1475.4 + + v� +1471.5 +1470.6 + + + + + + + + _� + I o +1453.4 w • �1467.3 2 6 0 mI m I 1 ��O >na7F 1464.5 ---- ---- m 1473.3 1472.4 1 1479. v + + 1469.6 1462.5 1467.5 1460.6 WILD M A❑L E J 475.E I i • +1470.5 + + + 1452.5 O 7.1 S I 1475.1 11 CO❑R❑ 4 1.6 1 I 1,74.8 PREPARED FOR: LOT TABULATION MANNING HOMES TOT❑❑ TOT❑❑ BUILDING LOT PRIVATE ❑RO❑O❑❑ OPEN SPACE TABULATION NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 20151 SW BIRCH STREET 1TE 150 OT NO[] ❑❑❑N DOT ❑R❑❑ ❑R�❑T❑ DOT FOOTPRINT COVERAGE (%) OPEN SPACE ❑RONT CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TYPE (SF) AREA (SF) (SF) SETBACK PRIVATE OPEN SPACE = 175,641 SF TEL: (949) 250-4200 ER ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑�❑❑ ❑❑� ❑�❑❑ ❑❑ ° ER ❑❑®❑❑ °❑�❑❑ ❑1M❑❑ ❑❑11 ❑®❑❑ ❑❑ COMMON OPEN SPACE: PREPARED BY: ❑ ❑ °°IM°° °°®❑° °1M°° °°� °1M°° °° 1) OPEN SPACE AT PROJECT ENTRY (LOT A) = 15,687 SF ❑ ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑11 ❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑� ❑®❑❑ ❑❑ 2) OPEN SPACE AT PROJECT ENTRY (LOT B) = 8,504 SF MADOLE 9302 Plll'3BURC#I AVE,SUITE 230 ❑ ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑� ❑❑�❑❑ ❑❑ 3) OPEN SPACE AT PROJECT ENTRY (LOT C) = 28,568 SF ; RAI'll=AMONGA,Qk MM PHONE:909.481.6322 ❑ ER ❑❑®❑❑ °❑1M❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑® ❑❑�❑❑ ❑❑ 4) OPEN SPACE AT PROJECT ENTRY (LOT D) = 27,311 SF Engineering Communities for life FAX- 909.481.6320 ° ° °°®°° °°®°° °®°° °°� °°�°° °° 5) PUBLIC EQUESTRIAN FEEDER TRAIL AND GREENBELT = 29,022 SF ° ❑ °❑®°° ❑❑®❑° °®°° ❑°® °1M°° °° TOTAL COMMON OPEN SPACE = 109,092 SF ❑❑ LR ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑�❑❑ ❑❑EE ❑®❑❑ ❑❑ TENTATIVE ❑❑ ER ❑❑IM❑❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑�❑❑ ❑❑� ❑❑�❑❑ ❑❑ TOTAL COMMON OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE OF SITE = 25.7% ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑� ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ AR ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑11❑❑ °®°° °❑� ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ TOTAL OPEN SPACE AS A PERCENTAGE OF SITE = 67.1% TRACT NOm 20334 ❑❑ ER ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑� ❑❑�❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑EE ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑ RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 ❑❑ ER ❑❑®❑❑ ❑❑�❑❑ ❑®❑❑ ❑❑� ❑❑�❑❑ ❑❑ DETAILED SITE PLAN M TOTAL LOT AREA : 275,397 SF "A" STREET: 1.63 AC o AVERAGE LOT AREA : 16,200 SF EAST AVENUE: 0.2E AC SUBTT 20334 N GROSS AREA : 10.24 AC DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q NET AREA : 9.74 AC C=4 TOTAL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: 175,641 SF SHEET OF 11 Uj > AVERAGE FRONT SETBACK : 30 FT CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w WILSON AVENUE TRACT \ / / I 4 5. 5 BOUNDARY \ / // i' I w w z Uj 16' EQUESTRIAN EASEMENT 5' PRIVATE VARIES \\\\ '/ / LOT "C" I DRAINAGE I EASEMENT LOT „C„ I I I \-- 14-58:6 I IL Q BANYAN STREET = PAD=1463.0 ----- 3.4' I 2 Y 1 I - - �� i i I BLUE CG Ujft o Q 9 z PROPOSED ENCEC 2-RAIL FENCE I 1.7 1.7 I - - - - - I 1 18' I 5 DRIVE Z � - -' - - 3 z PROJECT rz I � N SITE 40 20 0 40 80 I - PROPOSED STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY b CONCRETE "V" DITCH I m 3.8% °D •� I ,�s� PER EQUESTRIAN CITY ER STD.A 10 B SCALE: 1 =5 �� �. �,�` s�s�F°�`� ° ❑1 C I N I ❑Y MA❑ ETAINING WALL NLY N.T.S. OM INATION WALL _ WITH REFLEC VE C CE WITH 1.5' MARKER C� I N 15 5 D E❑AIL "A" SCALE: 1"=20' r\ I 1494.9 7468.7 • n���\Yn�/�� [�[��/] +1495.4 1494.5 1493.5 0 P°IJ .18.11� "/ " 496.2 I 1487.5 + i`184.4 1�27 + � �� G�G� � � � � 0 14T \ I 1 + P. p d d 1 1486.5 1480.5 Q�� 1478.8 hJ ��C�C� 1476.4 1470.5 I 1467.3 o --- ---7497.7 I / �. + + �Q�Q��[� I --% ---- . IJ L� DEBRIS -) ---- 1489.5 4 I . b o= 146�2 ; IE-❑-R--❑-S-❑ o � 1477m19 V 1492.8 484.E 1476.2 � o 1485.7 WSb + 0❑R❑Qb1 RAT BO -ALL � -- -- _ 102.00' �1 - - �I 7600- rn 1 II G A p � ° ���TANK ❑ _ .0 � �* - - -- �- - - - 1 N I = 1487 s p HIGH PR LET 1 .3 N 1492.8 + j 1 _ • PROP. D OP IN N + 4925 SOCK W o 01479.5 co + cn 1493 4 � 0 1488.4 �-1 I li cD cn 1482.E + = x 177 = 6.2 I II + = 14 4 R P. TO D I 1484.4 + � rn A = x 1481.E T I 1474.4 I � 491� -�I o FA H I + o f 6 + �6°� c rn0 1487.3 14 .2 1 I +1488.5 + \Dc I 1481.4 j 1477..5 o F z of J N o �, 17 1 I 16 1483.5 +1482.1 ! + 14 + �9.7 / 1 + +1475.6 1 11 1 10 +1471 4, �y�.� � o + � I I 1473.E 1472.E � 1480.E o 1478 I 1476.3 I 1474.2 I 14 .1 1 70.0 _ '� ADDITIONAL 14 01 m Fc�>.� '�' � DEDICATION I I ��, �46327 0, 14 � ' AREA AIN FOR 9��5FE I F 1479.E F F -PROVID�1/2 K 1483.E G� � 480.E II + 1477.7 G�� 1475.E G� 1 1472 5 1 4�0 1469.E �� .53 - ENING FOR GE I I + G I I + ,73s 1 1470.E + - w 48 488 LO ��- Ik l 31.6 I + 48l LC I I I �°/�� 486 OPOSED TRACT 6 `� `��,, P c/F 1 `'� �/� �/� �/ 14s8.6hi61 Li o �, bK ° � DEBR 1481.5 DRAIN l , 11 1478.5 14 4 1475.4 1473.E j 1463.4 �/ 1X61, O O 11V11 ll •, 181_3 483 115.1 + 104.00 A3.00 102.00 + 02.00 + 00 102.00 1470.3 102.00 85 + I r, ]O° (T(��j ��I --- 1486. , 1484.4 1 14 9. I c�I n F% A c� >i �� 2.1% �°�, �� S❑R I \C, - •- I T� I> c> ❑ �� (� n n �h I Q \7 50 VCC� - > _ wI c � '�II 1 > > > >10'' C I ►,� a i�//❑ 50 VC r'1=1485.01 % 2\ _ I r �86 I '�a I �`� �`� (PUBLIC) �/ 'Q� 1�. 1477 ° �� SDI I\ cc, �� \°� ° c 6S] 6Q I :' I" LLJ _ WA 1E4R 102.00' i 1 .00' /r 102.00' . C/F IF %T� I p 7 c� + 000' I � 102.00' 102.00' + 102.00 GIF I III 14' / 1483.4 1478E 1 1468.5 1466.3 5 14695 ----------- C/F C F I �F+1484.2 + FILL 1475.5 1472. 1470.5 1485.5 D 1481.6 1476.5 + + c + ��. I I - - - ;� WALL G I I 6 0 V C UNDARY R/Wpz jIs I I `� � F .5 8 .a 1472.E cR cc> _1482 . ' I 1473 5 14704 1465.E � 14 4 14� 1 +279.4 7. 3 5 7 8 7 G I l �F ro I C1 I ,t�sr 'I I 4 s.5+ + / F 14 + 1.8 479.3 14 1 471.7 146 466. 14" { 0 • ❑+145 5.5nY 1459.3 479.5 6 o CONCco 14 = 14773 D 1474.5 1465.7y481.5 1480.4 .+ + 1475.6 • L + ++ 5 Ij XI N ST. 1, j _ ll��l0 � zcn 1j �I 1464.14 4 1 aw 14v 1455.4 + 2:1 2: - - - - - + - - - - +� - - - - - ���, vg 1 5 D STR - - - - - - - - - - - - _ • - - - - - - - - - -- - -- 11 4 1485.E - .5 /93.11, 102.00' 10 .UU rl 102.00' � Q �c 1 '` J I EXIS 14ao.6 _ _ �- �EB �ACrTB�OLR o ]J Q - - _ ]ems '� ORIS ^�o Wiz' PR o �G� �srs� � ' �b 1 I RI 1 cV z 477.1 m w W = 1473.4 o ¢ x CK WALL z o p i o J 1474.5 �+ + p 02215-1 ° 0 00 467.E o N¢ 1465.5 I h1 �1' �9 cn ¢ 1472.3 1471.7 1466.� W N- N v 1464.4 1462.5 W o ~¢ m ❑L❑ L7LJ1 0 w o - + '� � � + + + x ¢� o cn� w Nz 0 1 5 5 Ocb _ ��.pp O j �1476.9 Q w 1469.5 �/7 �n o �. � o o N 11J I'� E 14- 7.4 I 1477. z o • CI- CD V Lr,�� ll V N v¢ z can 1456.3 1,95 �� Q + o ¢ 1473 4 z 1466.3 ¢ E 1474.3 0 w I I V••� W • 1469.5 467.8 1464.7 1463.4 1461.6 cn 1475.4 + 1470.s + 1462.5 14535 48) 1453.4 . + + + + + + ++ + + + W C.D -f � �c�"�• 1 1467.3 \ o 4 14 .73 E COURT ¢ I 1467.E N -- - m +1464.5 1479./ c� ,. - +1473.3 +1472.4 ��o �1468.5 + A^ r �A�� ���� 5 7460.6 F PREPARED FOR: LEGEND MANNING HOMES b 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 EXISTING STREET ELEVATION 6o NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 EXISTING STORM DRAIN  SD-- TEL: (949) 250-4200 CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA BENCH MARK UTILITIES EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM --- 8"s ---- EXISTING WATER SYSTEM ---8"w 0--- PREPARED BY: SET 2.5" BRASS DISK NORTHWEST CORNER OF NORTHERLY CATCH BASIN AT WATER/SEWER CABLE PROPOSED STREET ELEVATION 44 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF EAST AVENUE & BANYAN 361- NORTH OF THE LEY WATER DISTRICT FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CUCAMONGA VALLEY BCR ON THE WEST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE STAMPED "RANCHO CUCAMONGA 1 CU440 ASHFOR STREET PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM --SD- BENCH MARK 1088 A" P.O. BOX 638 (877) 426-9117 PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM 8"S- MA D O L E 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE,SUITE 230 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM "w RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.91730 EARTHWORK SUMMARY (909) 987-2591 • • PHONE 909.481.6322 PROPOSED LOT NUMBER 17 CUT FILL GAS TELEPHONE RETAINING WALL Engineering Communities for Life FAX: 909.481.6320 MASS EXCAVATION 18,300 CY 15,526 CY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. COX COMMUNICATIONS 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL SHRINKAGE (15.0%) - 2,329 CY 1981 W. LUGONIA AVENUE (877) 473-2013 SUBSIDENCE (0.2 FT) - 3,636 CY REDLANDS, CA 92373 TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PAD OVEREX (5.0 FT) 18,876 CY 18,355 CY RANCHO NGA, CA 91730 (909) 335-7715-7715 PVC 2-RAIL FENCE n n n TENTATIVE LOT SPOIL075 CY/LOT AND NOTE" TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY -- UNDERGROUND CHAMBER 2,700 CY ELECTRIC PROPOSED 2.1 OR 3.1 SLOPE 2:1T CT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC NOm TOTAL EARTHWORK 37,17E CY 37,17E CY 7951 REDWOOD AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY, INCLUDING STREET TREES STREET LOTS FONTANA, CA 92336 SHALL BE INSTALLED PER THE PUBLIC RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 (909) 357-6581 IMPROVEMENT PLANS. PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT �--� STREET LIGHT 3 AREA SUMMARY OWNER/APPLICANT/DEVELOPER DAYLIGHT LIGHT -F CONCEPTUAL G DING PLAN IZI- GROSS AREA = 10.74 AC MANNING HOMES CIO CD M NET AREA = 9.74 AC 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 WATER QUALITY INFILITRATION _ _ SUBTT 20334 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 PIPE SYSTEM d DISTURBED AREA = 8.63 AC CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA ~ DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 TEL: (949) 250-4200 HEIGHT OF EXPOSED WALL H=6' SHEET C-5 OF 11 ILL! AT THIS DIRECTION > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w R/W R/W / EAST AVENUE HOA 102' 102' 102' 102' 102' 0 .4 102' 102' 0 .4 102' 1 102' HOA GOLDEN LOCK LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLACE 6'± 12' LOT A ~2' PROPOSED 6'--,-_. LOT LOT LOT 9 ow I BLOCKWALL 1 2 3 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT ❑OT ❑OT coF�sFo 5 6 7 8 ❑ ❑ 12 PROPOSED PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER SIDEWALK I SECT/ON A— /�/� I PROPOSED CURB & GUTTER SCALE: H: 1"=20' V: 1"=8' PROPOSED TRACT SIDEWALK BOUNDARY PROP. 6' BLOCK WALL 5' LOT 'D' DRAINAGE I EASEMENT PAD: 1467.7 1 I 2 I 1 1 2' 2' SOUTHERLY NORTHERLY EXIST. GROUND TRACT TRACT rC-41 BOUNDARY R/W R/W BOUNDARY 163.82' 56' 149.17' ATE DRAINAGE "A'STREET > EASEMENT PROP. "V" DITCH �A 5' PRIVATE DRAINAGE PROPOSED EXISTING GROUND /+ I EASEMENT 6' BLOCKWALL I ___ SECT/ON C-V I I 16' EQUESTRIAN 12' 2' PADD 475.2 I I PAD 478. PROPOSED SCALE: H:1 "=5' EASEMENT V:1 "=5' 0.5' 4' 7.5' 18' 18' 8' "V' DITCH 15' EQUESTRIAN I I PROPOSED TRAIL I II 6' BLOCKWALL II II I II I II PROPOSED PVC II PROPOSED 2-RAIL FENCE �I `ti SIDEWALK SECT/ON B-B SCALE: H: 1"=20' V: 1"=8' TRACT R/W BOUNDARY PROPOSED PROPERTY 'A' STREET HOA LANDSCAPE 6' BLOCKWALL LINE LOT B I EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED / EAST AVENUE HOA LANDSCAPE 6' BLOCKWALL SIDEWALK I (L' — \ LOT 1 SWALE 12' PARKWAY PAD 481.8 I SWALE LOT 'A' 2% 6'± 7.5' LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK `— Q�PG� SECT/ON F-F SCALE: H: 1"=5' PROPOSED CONC. V: 1"=5' CURB AND GUTTER SECT/ON E-E SCALE: H: 1"=5' V: 1"=5' WALL 2' PROPOSED 6' HIGH TRACT BLOCK WALL BOUNDARY LOT 4 TRACT PAD 477.2 BOUNDARY TRACT 5' PRIVATE BOUNDARY DRAINAGE 16' EQUESTRIAN PROPOSED 6' HIGH EASEMENT I 5' PRIVATE TRAIL EASEMENT 1 I BLOCK WALL 2.0' 2.0' 2.0' I 2 DRAINAGE 15' EQUESTRIAN 6" PROPOSED BLOCK WALL WITH TRAIL 1/2 BLOCK OPENING AT 20' 2' EASEMENT PROPOSED PVC O.C. FOR DRAINAGE FROM EXISTING GROUND 1 0 3.4' PROPOSED PVC 2—RAIL FENCE EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOME I N _ ___ ——— 2—RAIL FENCE 1 EXISTING GROUND LOT 12 2 \ 2 0% — __ __ —_ EXIST. GROUND ►� MOW CURB ❑__ _ 2:1 SLOPE 1 PROPOSED CONCRETE — LOT 17 PAD= 474.2 "V' DITCH ROPOSED CONCRETE DITCH > � PAD= 485.1 PREPARED FOR: SECT/ON G-G SECT/ON H-H SECT/ON J-J MANNING HOMES SCALE: H: 1"=5' V: 1"=5'SCALE: H: 1"=5' SCALE: H: 1"3 V: 1"=5' 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TEL: (949) 250-4200 PREPARED BY: NOTE PROPOSED WHERE A RETAINING WALL IS CONSTRUCTED AT THE TOE OF 6' BLOCKWALL 9302 PmseuRcaH AVE,sum 230 SLOPE THE HEIGHT OF THE SLOPE SHALL BE MEASUREDFROM THE TOP OF WALL TO THE TOP OF SLOPE. 2' FACE OF RANCHOCUCAMON:909.4 9r322FOOTING .11MADOLE � PHONE=909.46L6322 TOP OF Engineering Communities for Life FAX- 909.48L6320 SLOPE FACE OF AT LEAST THE SMALLER TENTATIVE R/W STRUCTURE TOE OF OF H/3 AND 40 FEET H EXIST. GROUND ��' O 6110 GOLDEN LOCK PLACE SLOPET CT TOP OF V-DITCH �� I 2 NOm 20334 �ZZZ °��oh�� N, _ _N��_ — _- - - - - - - ��� c - - � RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 _ AT LEAST THE SMALLER OF H/2 AND 15 FEET WALL NOTES PROP. FLOWLINE - SECTION 17.48.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT HOW TO MEASURE WALL HEIGHT ON THERAD 3LTHE PROPERTY LINE OF ADJACENT LOTS WITH DIFFERENT GRADES. PROP. DROP INLET PROP. DROP INLET IN SECTIONS PROP. STORM DRAIN PROP. CURB INLET FENCE AND WALL HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FINISH GRADE AT THE BASE OF THE M FOUNDATION CLEARANCE FROM SLOPES FENCE OR WALL TO THE UPPERMOST PART OF THE FENCE OR WALL; EXCEPT WHEN THERE IS N A DIFFERENCE IN THE GROUND LEVEL BETWEEN TWO ADJOINING PAECELS, THE FENCE OR WALL SUBTT 20334 0 FIGURE 1808A. 7i I SHALL BE MEASURED AT THE MID-POINT OF THE RETAINING WALL HEIGHT AS MEASURED ON THE V-DITCH PROF/LE - LOT 'D' TO GOLDEN LOCK PLACE SIDE WITH THE LOWEST FINISH GRADE. SEE FIGURE 17.48.030-2 (MEASUREMENT OF FENCE AND CBC 2016 WALL HEIGHT ON PARCELS WITH DIFFERENT ELEVATION). DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q ❑❑�� -ii I'i i_ a NOT TO SCALE SHEET ❑ ❑ OF 11 w CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w WILSON AVENUE z z S�`��`� 0 J W Z Q BANYAN STREET M Y U Y O W W BLUE GG S DRIVE Z PROJECT SITE STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY ❑ICINI ❑Y MA❑ N.T.S. \\ I I III I 1494.9FM O 1 l> a �� 1468.7 1495.4 1484.4 1482.7 0 0 0 1476.4 O O + 14673 -_______- - +1494.5 1493.5 I po o p % �� &6.2 i 1487.5 1486.5 + 1480.5 � � � + 1470.5 I \ + 1478.8 --- ---7497.7 i I \ �� Q + + + �JL�1CLr, HT - 1466. a� -------- / DEBRIS 0 I o 0 I 1489.5 - cn 0 1466.E ❑ k�OL E ❑R❑S❑ o co II II II = 1465.E ---z - -- -- ---z� .�- N 89°2602 E 1008.30 ------ --fSD -- ----- - ---------- �- - ---- O❑R❑ � a � 9 5 i 1 1494.3 � IJ L� IJVIJ� �- U I = > Q w _ „ , _ 147�1 1�1'7�� 1492.8 -_ � -- ---1�F8 z---- 1 ❑ + ¢N + fiv„ DIT 76. 0 , 14652 -------- / WALL 1 1490.8 ® - TRACT BOUN Y 828.09' - _ _ _ _ _ - N4 53 _ 6' HIGH TUBULAR 1 c o S�TANK ❑ _ .0' ( - - - -�� - -_- - - - �- - -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - STEEL FENCE1465.2 1�4, 1 1 O PROPOSED 6' HIGH 1 ( I I`1 3 0 49215 I�1499/2.8 �n BLOCK WALL 13 o o 12 � 11 i 6 10 i I - 1493.4 rn 1 ' iLSI�O�� H(G E 5' PRIVAT -0 17 -� 16 -� -= 14 _ = _ �i 11 DRAINAGE = I 15IPA H ui 1I I CD mll LmsG❑ o f I I I I I o J o II II II �� II 11 - ❑ 1 �� Z90.5 � � � Coo z �i � i i � 1 1 01 1 1 1 � 1 i � i i I 1 1 I I I LOT D ADDITIONAL , I I I � 1 1 � 1 � I o f I � � I ,n 463� z 1 Z I AREA DRAIN FOR OF -SITE 1 1 I I 1 1 11 1 1 1 I 1 6 ' = W 1490.E 1489. °° I DEDICATION ❑ 1 ti stQ 2 , '"2`�Z`� DRAINAGE-PROVIDE 1/2 BLOCK I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I _ I I I , rn 207.53 OPENING FOR DRAT AGE I I - - 1 w� 489 488 I - LOW I I �1 � I I - � I I I - �I ❑ l - I I - - I LI I I I I 2 2 (2' 0 n 9 2 II 48 486 I PROPOSED TRACT o 2' 1 485 I PARKWAY 84 I DRAIN IJ l/ll o o ° 1 181.30' 4 483 I 115.19 104.00 103.00 I / 102.00' I / 102.00 / 102.00 I / 102.00 I / 102.00 �I 152.85 H T H0. 17651 YDRAN I I XISTIN FIRE I - 0 REL ATED) I IB. co ..A.. S❑RE E❑ N33�D 1LU s - - - (PUBLIC) I 1 I I 8'W 8'W- 8„W 8»W ;, 8,>W R"I� 8»W - 8„W z _ 1 I I N vu o X 1460.7 1 85.5 I I � ' ' IF IF w I I 79.51 102.00 102.00 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00 153.14' I � �� II I1 11 I I \ I I I I 11 I I I 1 - I W TER ER B0 I I I I I I I I I I I \ XIST I I 1 � 14855 TO BE R PIA ED WIT I I _ 1 - I 1 �1 - - 1 I I I - - - - C TDBDES _I II - II - I II I I I I I WALL - � k - - � CD 1483.4 it i + LOT � 11 `� i � `� 1 � � 1 � `� I 11 II 11 ' F I I � - - - - 1 0l 4 • I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 � I I � �, �, � m 1 O Sa' I 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 LOT C i I �A I a ❑ 44P I A 11 I I I I _ , I 1 I 1 11 I +1455.5 1485.5 32' I� w `n I 10 1 `0 1 `fl `fl `o `a `fl 44 I o 11 o f o I I o I 1 1 0 1 1 II 1 1 1 1 \� �� /�///� I I ^ 5 CONC 1 32 w 1 = = = 11 = II 11 = 1 , / � 1481 ¢ r� II 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 w� L 1 a w I 2 3 ❑RO❑OSED ❑mIG❑ �1 Qw L 1 �I xl .. N sT: LIG 1 ; 1 11 1 1 1 1 ❑LOCK WALL 5 Q 11 6 1 1 7 j l 8 0 B RELOCATED _ _ + �\ - �'� - - - - - - - - � - - IF y I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � 1 I 1 5 4 a 14554 R OSED STREET �- - - - - �- - - ❑ - - - - - - 14856 I R DTI I I - - - - - - - -- - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - -- - - iB ���� I II I I 1 � I 93.1 ' 102.00' 10 .00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.0 ' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 102.00' 176.00' 2 .00' J IN EXIS I G 9'48'07" W - oo❑ o CT BOMAR o _ b RO ❑❑C N 894 '07" W DEBRIS 1 99.11' - - - r 144. - _ - _ - - �i�DBRI IL FENC o O❑OSED 1 I I X RM �� N � o ° +1476.4 0 = wN _ � cfl / _ 3¢z II �- z o _ w z �477.1 m I I N" 1473.4 D O N o v Z cn 1465.5 + W w ¢ �,� m a = w ¢ + 146 1464.4 1462 5 - 7 . I `p�'�Q _ Q I o 1474.5 N 1472.3 1471.7 + 0 2215=1 = 0 467.6 W o cNi�¢ cy W ------ 1 +❑L M _ - 0 147E 9 + o OPOSOMBINATI 1469.5 + + �¢m C> w o N 0 1 5 5 1480. 14 1 14HT z v~i w ¢ V G�1ly A z n a ®�I❑E o z -RAfL FENCE WIT 1456.3 I 1 +7474.3 1473.z o 1471.5 1470.E 1469.5 1467.8 +1466.3 ��G1464.7 +1463.4 14625 +1461.6 MAXIMU RETAINING 1453.5 '1 1453.4 +14754 + �¢ + + + + + + �� + I + w • + w 1 c' a Al 1467.3 4 2.6 � ------------ 1 °¢° I I 1 1467.6 +1464.5 1479. c..� � +1473.3 +1472.4 1468.5 + 1460.E • w 1469.6 + 1465.5 1462.5 1461.5 WILD M A❑L E 475.E I i 1470.5 + + + + + 14525 1451.4 - - - O J 4 I 14751 �s I I 4 1.6 ❑R❑ I+ *SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR WALL DETAILS AND MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED FOR: LEGEND MANNING HOMES EXISTING STORM DRAIN = sD---- 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 EXISTING SEWER SYSTEM ----s----- CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA EXISTING WATER SYSTEM ----w----- 40 20 0 40 80 TEL: (949) 250-4200 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN SYSTEM PREPARED BY: PROPOSED SEWER SYSTEM 8"S o PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM �1W z PROPOSED LOT NUMBER n MA D O L E RETAINING WALL 9302 PIITSBURGH AVE,SUITE 230 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL WITH RETAINING RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA.W30 PHONE:909.481.6322 6' HIGH BLOCK WALL Engineering Communities for life FAX 909.481.6320 TUBULAR STEEL FENCE PVC 2-RAIL FENCE TENTATIVE TRACT BOUNDARY -- TENTATIVE HEIGHT OF EXPOSED WALL H=6' AT THIS DIRECTION TRACT 20334 PROPOSED 2:1 2:1 fi- NO . STREET LOTS "q" RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WALL NOTES STREET LIGHT f SECTION 17.48.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE EXHIBIT HOW TO MEASURE WALL HEIGHT ON THE CONCEPT AL WALL PLAN THE PROPERTY LINE OF ADJACENT LOTS WITH DIFFERENT GRADES. WATER QUALITY INFILTRATION -CL PIPE PIPE SYSTEM F FENCE AND WALL HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE FINISH GRADE AT THE BASE OF THE o �- - �I� - FENCE OR WALL TO THE UPPERMOST PART OF THE FENCE OR WALL; EXCEPT WHEN THERE IS SUBTT 20334 O A DIFFERENCE IN THE GROUND LEVEL BETWEEN TWO ADJOINING PAECELS, THE FENCE OR WALLI MA z L - WU W&A WM MIA E SHALL BE MEASURED AT THE MID-POINT OF THE RETAINING WALL HEIGHT AS MEASURED ON THE O SIDE WITH THE LOWEST FINISH GRADE. SEE FIGURE 17.48.030-2 (MEASUREMENT OF FENCE AND DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q WALL HEIGHT ON PARCELS WITH DIFFERENT ELEVATION). SHEET CL11 OF 11 ui > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w WILSON AVENUE z 0 J W Z Q BANYAN STREET M Y O LLJ 1' BLUE w , o a DRIVE N PROJECT SITE STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY ❑ICINI ❑Y MA❑ N.T.S. I o u o� I -2. -3.3 -4.0 4.0 -2.7 - -3. -4.6 4.4 .4 -4.3 -3.4 -4.6 -2.9 - - - - - - - - -3.5 - -4.2 - 1.8 .6 -1.0 I _ \ I II II I I -4.1 -3.3 -2.7 -3.8 2.3 -2.7 -1.8 -1.9 -3.3 1 1 -� .9 -�. - .9 .1 2.3 0.0 II II 11 11 II II I I I ; it i1 it II II I � I I� -3 -2.2 -1.3 I �.� - 2 -0. - ' I i I -1.6 i - .9 -1.3' j -3.9 3.2 1.0 I \ -C.1 - .2 -CA _-C.4 1 -1.9 -1.1 �.1 -C.` 0.1 0.7 I mo, I i I -C.7 0 0.1 I 4.8 2.0 ! �0.2 r - - .2 -2.2 I / I I j / -3.9 -3.8 ?.9 -3.9 -3.9 -4.0 a.2 -4.3 i / 0.9 V 3.0 - .1 -.3 -'�.4 - �� - - - ----- - 1.2 -2.6 -2 I I I1.0 �0.0 -1.4- -1.5- -1 ^ --_ 1 -2.2 -2.3 -2.5 -2.2 -1.9 -C.1 1.2 -2.1 I II 1� II II i 1 I I � I II I II 1 -C. 1.4 0.7 -1.6 -1.1 -C.4 -C.3 0.8 1 I 0.2 0.9 j.4 0.0 0.8 1 1 0 0.5 ��.� I� I 1.2 0.7 \-C.4 II 11 11 11 I ! � II -C.2 0.4 0.9 -C.5 0.0 0. 0.8 1.8 1 1 0.9 1.8 2.5 1.2 1.8 0.7 1.2 1.8 1 1 -1.1 -C.3 I-1.3 -C.2 0.5 11 0.4 0.2 0.9 -2. 0.7 2. 1.6 0.2 I II II 11 II I I � � 11 1 ' 1 I I I II 1 ' 11 11 I I II 11 11 I I I I I I j 0.0 0.8 0.6 1.2 i.9 1.9 2.9 I 2.0 2.8 3.6 2.3 2.9 1.7 2.3 2.9 0.2 1.0 I .0 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.4 �I.1 0.6 1.7 1 1 .1.2 1.6 2.6 2.4 I 1 I II jl I l i I I II 11 �1 , I I I I I I I II i 1 I I I I 11 I j I I I ' 2 0.7 1.7 2.3 3.Oi 3.0 3AD 1 3.0 3.6 4.8 �I 3.1 3.9 12.8 3.4 4.0 1.3 2.1 1 1.7 2.3 1.8 2.4. 2.2 1.7 2.6 I 3 3.5 3.6 I � / 1llz­ I 11 11 II I I -C.6- - -C.7- - __-C.2 -C.5_ _ =- - -=-C.5- - --C.6=- - --C.4 _ - - - - - --C.2 =- - --C__3- - - - - _- - - -C.1-- - - --C.1- - - - -0.0 - - - 0.0- - - - -0.0 - - - - - 0.3- - - - -0.1- - - - -0.6 - - - 0.5- - - - --0.5 - - 0.2 - -- - - 1.0 L0.3--= 0.9 - - - '1.8 1.3 ML LUE G DRI /E LEGEND C ❑ ❑ AREA FILL AREA EARTHWORK SUMMARY CUT FILL MASS EXCAVATION 18,300 CY 15,526 CY PREPARED FOR: SHRINKAGE (15.0%) - 2,329 CY SUBSIDENCE (0.2 FT) - 3,636 CY MANNING HOMES PAD OVEREX (5.0 FT) 18,876 CY 18,355 CY = LOT SPOIL075 CY/LOT AND ~ 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 o NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 UNDERGROUND CHAMBER 2,700 CY z CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TOTAL EARTHWORK 37,176 CY 37,176 CY TEL: (949) 250-4200 PREPARED BY: 40 20 0 40 80 MAD O L E W02 Pff S6uRW AVE,SUITE 230 RANCHO cx1 M&MA,Ca 91730 PHONE 909.481.6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX. 909.481.6320 TENTATIVE TRACT NO . 20334 RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 coC T/FILL SUBTT 20334 co 0 z DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q SHEET C-8 OF 11 > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w RESPONSIBLE PARTY FOR MAINTENANCE + INSPECTIONS: MANNING HOMES WILSON AVENUE 20151 SW BIRCH STREET, SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 LEGEND: HOME OWNERS ASSMATION TO MAINTAIN AFTER COMPLETION AND TURNOVER FORM 5-1 WATER QUALITY BMP INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE IMPERVIOUS LENGTH OF PRETREATMENT SYSTEM DCV DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME w w BMP MAINTENANCE IV I tDRAINAGE AREA AREA VALUE - DCV QBMP DRAINAGE SYSTEM +6T0".�PIPE PR ETREATMENT CAPACITY RETENTION % OF DCV ---S00E---- SQUARE FEET (FT 2) FREOUENCYAREA # VOLUME CIF CUBIC FEET (FT )AREA CLEARING AND CONTECH CDS EVERY APRIL & SQ. FT. ACRES % CU. FT. CF FT CFS CU. FT. % VACUUMING OF OCTOBER CY CUBIC YARDS BANYAN STREET 2020-5 SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS DA1 448,358 10.3 30 15,699 0.8 DA1 1 490 CDS 2020-5 1.1 15,911 101% VRET RETENTION VOLUME PRETREATMENTWITHIN STORAGE AR AND AFTER MAJOR RAIN BLUECLARIFIER (OR PER MANUFACTURERS PROP. PROPOSED GDRIVE APPROVED EQUAL RECOMMENDATIONS. EVENTS EXISTING CLEARING AND DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY 60 VACUUMING OF EVERY APRIL & PERFORATED OCTOBER EXISTING 1 .0 CONTOUR PROJECTRETENTION/ SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS AND SITE PIPE PER INFILTRATION MANUFACTURER'S AFTER MAJOR RAIN PERVIOUS/ LANDSCAPE AREA PIPES RECOMMENDATIONS. EVENTS CONCRETE/ IMPERVIOUS AREA STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY CLEARING OF EVERY APRIL & CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS OCTOBER 1478.8 70'5 7467.3 -------- �yP� W�WzQQ' i�hof Q FILTER WITHIN BASKET PER AND - + O_ I 1495.4 l +1487.5 + - +P - ' - + + Y Y •Y W Y - Y --_--� -- -s � - l \ C �CINSERTS MANUFACTURER'S AFTER MAJOR RAIN + 1466. RECOMMENDATIONS. EVENTS 1489.5 1465E 6 T 2 ❑R❑ ❑H ❑ICINI ❑Y MA❑ IAREPLACEMENT OF +1492.8 1485.7 1484 TRACT BOUNDARY DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARY + STORM DRAIN 7491.6 + + + + 2 � ER 14 N.T.S. STENCILING STORM DRAIN STENCIL AS NEEDED WALL � _ - -_ 1465.2 ------- TO MAINTAIN VISIBILITY. - - -- W ------- --- - + / - - -------- oNUurokyawto _�+-1485.E_ � c -\_�1III1 I 11❑4Z_7� '-'''''■I t IIII1 I1 1 I I1 I II,I-I --IIII _oWWWW•YYY$„�WWWWWW r4�8WWWWWW"�9�_I�'__WWWW•Y_~-_-WWWWWW_Y-4__--r1_-WWW•'YY1�€_-III-"WWWWW_��;--WWWW_`Y_-�-_�,WWWWWW1f-I__-1'WWWWW4Y1�892-y�WWWWQ V4 pa 7-�-wW Y�WWY�n-4-=WYY�d,WWWY_wWWWW-C_-1WW•YY WWWW-WW•YY*4WWW�S$--„1 WW34YY_8 5 3WW°-L'-I�WWWW1LI I WWWWWWWW_IIII11I IIIIr•��W WW YY, WW•WWWWWWY �WW.-_-I.W•IY�11_�WWWWW�1�I�.W•YY�-WW.WWv_WW•Y_WWW-_WWY _WWY WWWWWW WWWWWWWW IIW-1I/IIII III•WW.WWWWYy WWWY A�WW_-WWY�WW I WWY -WWWW►WWY �WWW„ WWY C�1 W,GY AWWWY�WWWW Y JW Y.�Ir1I1I s/WW Y WWWY WW WW-WW WY WWW��W•Y¶ryWW W0Y WW WW WWWY WWW II�Y I11 I WWW WWY W•Y_W WY WWW W•Y WW WY •WW YY WW-W•WWY WWW�+II.WI II .WWyY W _ -W- Y WWW Y W,Wy LI�III�WIYYJIIII 1 W,y •Y W •Y W Y+W DA1 7 WWW- TANKALL FUTURE MAINTENANCE, O \- _WY❑_W_--WY--W--WY--WWY- -j�YI✓-5_--IIIII W---YvQ WWW-_Y_Y-�WWWWI---�W WW•WY-iWWW --�WWWYY�_-WWW��8�-WWW�YY�tj--W••YY//-WWWWW�III�IIIII-�Y �-WWWYIIIIIIIIII Y�5 I� � I•�YI IIII 1lI �\ III 1 I11II I I 11 QI J 4 65 _O❑\r_II --II_-II C❑III_ -I _-❑1 I11I I I II 4u_-❑��-❑�- __I IIIiIIII SITE ITE DESIGN ESIGN S CAPTURE APTURE TVOLUME S SUMMARY UMMARY,W- . D A1 7. w- r'=16 1 ` APPLICABLE INSPECTION, REPAIR, TREATMENT AREA=448,358 SQ. F . (10.3 AC.) PR o & GROSS AREA = 10.24 AC. STRUCTURAL SOURCE ETC. AS APPLICABLE TO BE DETERMINED IMPERVIOUSNESS 30% (2 DU/AC.-FIGURE C-4) TREATMENT AREA (DA1 ) = 448,358 SQ. F T .CONTROL AND FOR ALL BMPs THAT NON-STRUCTURAL APPLY DURING FINAL DCV 15,699 CU. FT. EXISTING SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0 SQ. F T-" . SOURCE CONTROL DESIGN OF PROJECT. QBMP 0.8 CFS IMPERVIOUSNESS 30% (FIGURE C-4 FOR 2- DU/ACRE) U/AC RE) 7489.7BMPS Y I Y rYI ONC I -4 IMPERVIOUS AREA 134,507 SQ. FT. 1490.5 * W IW LOT � 22 22 9 12 P (2YR-1HR) = 0.642 IN17 13 637 1490 + 1490.E 15 14 12 � SITE DESIGN CAPTURE VOLUME = 15,699 CU. FT. SITE DESIGN WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE = 0.8 CFS * 1 I. . . W W . . . . . . Y WATER QUALITY MITIGATION SUMMARY Y 4 Y `V W W _4 11 W W W W IV I.y 1 'Y 1 'Y 486* STORMWATER RUNOFF AND NUISANCE FLOWS FROM THE NORTH SIDE O F THE 8 TRACT WILL ENTER "A" STREET AND GUTTERFLOW TO A CURB OPENING INLET A T 4 „„ W PP IY DP. k./ THE EAST SIDE OF THE TRACT. LOTS ON THE SOUTH SIDE WILL DRAIN TO A W W W PROPOSED V-GUTTER ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY. ALL FLOWS FROM THE PROJECT SITE WILL CONVERGE AT A PROPOSED DIVERSION MANHOLE LOCATED R W PROP. C& 1 11 „ PROP. STORM DRAI I WITHIN GOLDEN LOCKE PLACE. THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME WILL BE DIVERTED T O 85 M A PRETREATMENT CLARIFIER (CONTECH CDS -OR APPROVED EQUAL) THAT WILL W OP. C&G 11 8W s REMOVE TRASH, DEBRIS, OIL, SEDIMENT, AND POLLUTANTS BEFORE ROUTING U 4 RUNOFF INTO THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND RETENTION/INFILTRATION SYSTEM. W 'Y -Y+ THE SYSTEM WILL CONSIST OF PERFORATED 60" RETENTION PIPE, UNDERLAIN BY 1 \ W W W PR . WNL&TW W W W W A GRAVEL BED. THE PIPE WILL STORE THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME AS IT IS 1 W w 11 INFILTRATED INTO THE GRAVEL BED AND SURROUNDING SOILS. L LOT W W1 1 IV W 1Y W IV W W W IV YI W W IV l 41 1485.5 ,-PROP. &G Y Y ' W WATER QUALITY BMP NOTES: W W -Y Y WI I 1 1WQ SYSTEM 2 4 (SEE DETAIL CONTECH CDS2020-5 CLARIFIER (OR APPROVED EQUAL): STORMWATER QUALITY L ITY R U N O FF I El I 1 I 1 AND NUISANCE FLOWS FROM THE PROJECT SITE WILL BE DIRECTED INTO A CLARIFIER 14834 LOT+ Al2 j W = = I WW BEFORE ENTERING THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM. THE CLARIFIER WILL REMOVE TRASH DEBRIS, I S , Wy 7 W 9 I RSI N SEDIMENTS, OILS, AND POLLUTANTS FROM THE RUNOFF BEFORE ROUTING IT TO THE er LATITUDE=34°8 AN OE INFILTRATION SYSTEM. E:T WIY IV - 30 J6 Y , 14855 T I y Y IW W W IV LONGITUDE=117'3039 W 5 X 60" PERFORATED RETENTION PIPE AND INFILTRATION GRAVEL BED: AS CLEAN WATER FROM 32' 32 ❑ THE CLARIFIER ENTERS THE SYSTEM A PORTION OF THE WATER WILL INFILTRATE THROUGH1W W W W W W V ST, W1 W 1 THE GRAVEL BED UNDERNEATH THE PERFORATED PIPE. AS THE SOIL BECOMES SATURATEDPp 6� 6'WHIGy BOCF WALL W W W W W W W I IW THE 60" DIAMETER PIPE WILL RETAIN THE REMAINDER OF THE WATER QUALITY STORM UNTIL DROP INLET W W W W ROP V' TTER W W - WW - - - - .4+ 4 -1; W ___4 - - 5C'P Id 0 - W ^Y - --Y W W W _ 80.48 ❑ CATCH BASIN STENCIL "NO DUMPING WE LIVE DOWNSTREAM" OR APPROVED EQUAL ON EACH CATCH BASIN �o 480. T1476.4 RAC D REA B LJ AVOID COMPACTION, OR SCARIFY SOILS UNDERNEATH INFILTRATION SYSTEMS BEFORE "T INSTALLATION. 1478 477 3. U I + 1474.5 1472.3 1471.7 + 1467.E 1466E 1465.5 1454.4 1462.5LUE G 1476.9 + + 1469.5 + + � 145, 5 CATCH BASIN FILTER INSERTS TO REMOVE TRASH AND DEBRIS FROM STORMWATER BEFORE+ � ❑ 1480 1477.4 14�.6 --� 1456. 1 C IT ENTERS THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM.1RIV 1474.3 1473.4 1469.5 14678 1466.3 1463.4 1461.E EXIST. 24" SD LIN " +1475.4 + +1471.5 +1470.6 + + +1464.7 + 1462.5 + B +14534 NOTE: INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MUST BE INSTALLED ON „UNCOMPACTED SOIL„. IF SUBGRADE+ PER DWG. No. 2219-D IS COMPACTED, THE CONTRACTOR MUST RECONDITION THE SUBGRADE UNDER THE BMPS TO 14s73 + ° 2.6 SIMULATE AN UNCOMPACTED STATE 14733 14724 1468. 14676 +1464.5 + + 1460.E M1469.6 1465.5 1462.5 1461.5 5 4 1.61451. RT + FINISED GRADE LOT 'C' ----------- 37' 7' 7' 7' 7' 71 FIBERGLASS CDS2020 DESIGN NOTES 2' 2' 2' 2' 2' SEPARATION CYLINDER CENTER OF CDS STRUCTURE,SCREEN CDS2020 RATED TREATMENT CAPACITY IS 1.1 CFS, OR PER LOCAL REGULATIONS, MAXIMUM HYDRAULIC INTERNAL BYPASS W ANDINLET AND SUMP OPENING CAPACITY IS 14.0 CFS. IF THE SITE CONDITIONS EXCEED 14.0 CFS,AN UPSTREAM BYPASS STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED. TOP SLAB ACCESS THE STANDARD CDS2020 CONFIGURATION IS SHOWN. ALTERNATE CONFIGURATIONS ARE AVAILABLE AND ARE LISTED BELOW. m (SEE FRAME AND SOME CONFIGURATIONS MAY BE COMBINED TO SUIT SITE REQUIREMENTS. COVER DETAIL) DESIGNATION - _ _ ...... 1 L�p (MODEL SUFFX CONFIGURATION DESCRIPTION WASHED GEOTEXTILE/ FILTER FABRIC TO 60� PERFORATED A G GRATED INLET ONLY(NO INLET PIPE) GRAVEL BE PLACED AT TOP, BOTTOM, RETENTION/ GP GRATED INLET WITH INLET PIPE OR PIPES AND SIDES -PER ENGINEERS INFILTRATION SYSTEM PR �' SEWER 57 RECOMMENDATION MAX CURB INLET ONLY(NO INLET PIPE) 1 1 96' I IKP CURB INLET WITH INLET PIPE OR PIPES KB SEPARATE OIL BAFFLE(SINGLE INLET PIPE REQUIRED FOR THIS CONFIGURATION) i 12 2j j \ TYPICAL SECTION X 4 W SEDIMENT WEIR FOR NJDEP/NJCAT CONFORMING UNITS SCALE: 1 =10' _ ACCESS MANHOLE TOP SLAB ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE POP. PARALLEL PVC HYDRAULIC SHEAR 60"I.D. MANHOLE S FOR OFF E PLATE STRUCTURE SITE SPECIFIC FL WS ter starr PL 1 M DATA REQUIREMENTS +1-65" STRUCTUREID IL MAX. WATER QUALITY FLOW RATE(CFS) - Oo- R PEAK FLOW RATE(CFS) 34' STORM D C4PLAN VIEW RETURN PERIOD OF PEAK FLOW(YRS) N.T.S. CONTRACTOR TO GROUT TO 0h �T1E0LL1® I FINISHED GRADE %0F = a . SCREEN APERTURE(2400 OR 4700) 100' 04 14 6. 5 N oSTORMWATERPIPE DATA: I . PROP. CDS2020- PREPARED FOR: GRADE INLET PIPE 1 (OR APPROVED I RINGS/RISERS INLET PIPE 2 I EQUAL) D ✓ER IONLu OUTLET PIPE ACCESS RISER FOR M NH MANNING HOMES � rq RIM ELEVATION MAINTENANCE 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 omw E NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660FIBERGLASS ANTI-FLOTATION BALLAST WIDTH HEIGHT 5. 5SEPARATION CYLINDER CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA AND INLET NOTES/SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS: TEL: (949) 250-4200 FRAME AND COVER (DIAMETER VARIES) PREPARED BY: VARIES N.T.S. PER ENGINEER OF RECORD w INLET PIPE (4') (MULTIPLE INLET PIPES OUTLET PIPE MMAY BE ACCOMMODATED) GENERA_NOTES ADOLE92 PR8URGi AVE,SUITE 2301. CONTECH TO PROVIDE ALL MATERIALS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. DIMENSIONS MARKED WITH ()ARE REFERENCE DIMENSIONS. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS MAY VARY. RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 9730 3. FOR FABRICATION DRAWINGS WITH DETAILED STRUCTURE DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS, PLEASE PHONE:909.46t6322 Engineering Communities for Life FAX- 909.48L632000NTACT YOUR CONTECH STORMWATER SOLUTIONS REPRESENTATIVE. ww .contechstormwater.com 4. CDS WATER QUALITY STRUCTURE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL DESIGN DATA AND INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING. 5 4 5- STRUCTURE AND CASTINGS SHALL MEET AASHTO HS20 LOAD RATING. ------ -6. PVC HYDRAULIC SHEAR PLATE IS PLACED ON SHELF AT BOTTOM OF SCREEN CYLINDER. REMOVE AND 27 o PERMANENT REPLACE AS NECESSARY DURING MAINTENANCE CLEANING. POOL ELEV. PRELIMINA TER Q ALITY oOIL BAFFLE INSTALLATION NOTES SKIRT 1. ANY SUB-BASE, BACKFILL DEPTH,AND/OR ANTI-FLOTATION PROVISIONS ARE SITE-SPECIFIC DESIGN(5'3"}MINIMUM PROP. INLET CONSIDERATIONS AND SHALL BE SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD. PROP. INLET MANA EMENT PLAN 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE EQUIPMENT WITH SUFFICIENT LIFTING AND REACH CAPACITY TO LIFT AND MANHOLESET THE CIDS STRUCTURE (LIFTING T DETAIL 1 3. CONTRACTOR TO ADD JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN AL STRUCTURE SECTIONS,AND ASSEMBLE RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 SEPARATION (2') STRUCTURE. SCALE: 1 "=20' SCREEN 4. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE, INSTALL,AND GROUT PIPES. MATCH PIPE INVERTS WITH ELEVATIONS SHOWN. 5. CONTRACTOR TO TAKE APPROPRIATE MEASURES TO ASSURE UNIT IS WATER TIGHT, HOLDING WATER TOPVC HYDRAULIC SHEAR SITE PLAN PLATE FLOWLINE INVERT MINIMUM. IT IS SUGGESTED THATALL JOINTS BELOW PIPE INVERTS ARE GROUTED. WQMP BMP AS-BUILT CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE NECESSARY STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN STRUCTURAL STORM WATER TREATMENT N gi CDS2020 SUBTT 20334 SOLIDS STORAGE WNi = DEVICES HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND ARE FUNCTIONAL TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AS OF THE DATE BELOW. o SUMP SECTION A-A �&DS` STORMWATER PRECAST CONCRETE WATER QUALITY SYSTEM z THIS PRODUCT MAY BE PROTECTED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 C) N.T.S. FOLLOWING U.S.pATENTs:5,788,698;8,64%72Q;6,511,595;6,581,78; STANDARD DETAIL Q RELATED FOREIGN PATENTS,OR OTHER PATENTS PENDING. contvchsiDRnwatafca{n V SHEET C=9 OF 11 Uj > SIGNATURE DATE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w 1508.6 ❑ 1508.4 CONC 15055 1501.4 CONC +7497.7 0 1495E �� 1 L� � 1485.4 ���/ v BRUSH 1508.5 0/ F + + + 1498.2 © © © ° pII �❑ RAMP 1493.6 1492.6+ + CONC / 14834 14753 1502 6 446 .�E:J- +497 + + V 1485.2 1482.4 + 0 0 1507.2 �� o ❑ 0 0 1504.9 0 ° :'1302 `7�7- 1507.8 1506.7 O 1501.51494.61491.4 196.53 7507 4 J^ 1504.7 1503 7 1502.5 1499.6 1490.4 1489.5 1488.5 © __ - L485-44=___ ____ - 7483.2 - _ \ 1500.E 7498.6 7496.5 0 1493.5 1492 6 0 =1 863 --- r -- 1495.E - 1501.4 G�-� Gj � CO ------------------ ------ ---- - -------- ---- ---- - -- -1459.E ----- ---- ---- -- ---- ----- -- ------- ---- ----- ---- ---------- ----- -- - -- ---J- 1504.5 � 1496. • • • ---- o 7503 5 1503 6 • + 148E{- - ------ -F 489.�- 1485.4 150 .3 ❑ 1488.1 1486.7 -------------- 14838 � � 1481.2 � 1481.5 1 �sBi-r 001 � ��� ------ ❑ I I T❑ 15°° 1 ❑ .( I 0 0 1 WALL I 1 1490.4 7483 3 1476.5 �j0 7J^�S I All 1 7499.7 1497.4 1493.5 + 1487.5 + + 14 6 1479.5+ 1491.5 + 1485.7 1484.7 150 .4 1 150Q.8 = + 1 + + + +� 1495.7 1 1482.4 +1475.3 7 �} 1 c 1 1491.6 1484.E 1478.1 7503.E 1503.5\I 1 1500.4 + 1500.3 1495.4 1 + 1485.E + + 1474.s+ L + + 1 14935 + 1482.E 1476.5 I 1 1500.7 1497.5 1 + + + 1470.1 NODE 65 I 1 I CON /kg5 ° 1489.4+ 14875 �+j 147 I I 1 15 1.4 1 1499.4 � 1 14921 1489.E 7483.5 7482.5 • ,] 1 1 1 1 1 + 1498.8 + O Q + 14 +1487 4 1485.5 + + � 1 4 8 2 S 75 501.E 1 1498.E 1496'2 749 5 + ^ 1 ' _° ROCKS ; L= 5 Q 100- 1 %J �1480.7 L= 1 1 1474. + 1 1 1 ° - - - -- 1 - - - - -- - - - LIGHT - - - - - - = - - 7472s 1 14 8.7 1496.9 O 1 1489.5 BRUSH 1481.E - - + \ +7470.3 + + 1473.7 14 3.4 75�0 � + 1497.3 � � 14so.s LIGHT OBSCUR�D.+ + 1 + 1486.5 -r--�- 0 1494.6 5 A + +14825 BRUSH + 1 I I 1499.E • BRUSH 1478.7 �0 I 1494.5 1479.5 +1478.4 1471.4 �1496.6 + +1488.6 +1484.5 + 0 0 1482.8 7469.5 1 _ J 1496.2 oo O O 1498.4 1496.3 � 1495.17 1486.4 + 1480.7 + - I , 0 ---------\\�� I I ( 74955T 1 + �° + + L- 183 , n 1 --_ �\ • 1494.9 1484.4 1482.7 1468.7 1494.5 1493. 1 + + 1496.2 1 1486.5 + + 1480.5 NQ3 1478.8 + + 4_1 D 7 5 - _ + \ + - 1495.4 1487.5 + + + ❑ o ° --- _ -- ---1�77 1 I I • Q + + 466.3 11`° ---- W o = 6. T 1 �7 ❑R❑ ❑H � I ❑ DEBRIS� 148s.5 ° 95 1 I 494.3 7494.3 14771 7465 -- --+--------_ U I + 74928 + p� 14857 1484.E 74825 1480.5 1478.5 + +1476.2 -� ❑ � 1 ❑ + 1491.6 1 + + + + + WALL 1490.8 - - - - - ------- 1 I -- - - - - - - - - _ - -------- 1 1 74szs TANK ❑ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - (0 1465.2 I 1 _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � I 14 492�5 1492.8 17 16 1.1 15 14 13 12 11 `11 10 1493 4 1491.4 1 1 5.2E ii ii 1i ii ii i1 II 1489.7 I l 1 1 I I 1 1 SCALE IN FEET I 1 CONC II II II II II 1 0.58 AC 0 50 100 150 200 1490.5 1 I I I I 74637 1 1 A kO 478.' 474.2 472.1 4 0.0 �490 � + 1490.6 1489. I ► I � -- 1 1 NOVE 4 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 j 11 I - 1 0 E 1 Q, 00= 15. 1 CF 1 I i1 1 1 ,J L= 1464 , 1 1487. 1 461.4 1 _ L=950 - - - - - - - L=520 - - - * - V _ % %;8 -A _Q100= 4.4 CFS I I o 1460.7 1 85. 7i- I I I I II 11 1 11 I \ I1 II II \ I I I i 57.7 ------- s 184.5 1 1485.5 - - , - _ _ 24 1 I WALL T.4 1 l i l 1 1 48/.8 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 469.9 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 \ PAC- I +1455.5 1 14855 I j1 I i 1 I 11 1 1 \\\\ NODE 11 5 CONC 1 I 11 11 11 , �� ° 1481. I I + 1 . 13 AC L1 � I L I INV= 145, 1/ / �, 1 1 it 2 I 3 1 1 q, 5 1 1 6 7 8 9 1 = _- + Imo - - - - - - - - - - 100 28.3 CFS I I;I 1455.4 Now 1 1485E 71 - - -- _ _ - - -- _ - -- - -- - - _ -- 1 01 7480.480 14 7480.6 1 IG ao�- - 0❑ RIG B Eli DEHRI�; 1 DEBRIS 7 ° + +7476.4 � + ' 1 1478. 7477.1 1473 4 � 79. 1 + 1474.5 + 1472.3 1471.7 + 1467 6 1466.6 1465.5 1464.4+ 1462.5 , _ _ +1476.9 + + 1469.5 + + � 7480 7 --t)RIV1477 4 1477 6 • 7474.3 1473 4 1469.5 1467.8 1466.3 '��bG7464.7 1463.4 1462.5 1461.6 1 1454.1 1456. 1475.4 + + 1471.5 1470.E + + + + + + ° + + + + + I �� 446 � 1 Q 00 20 S 452.6 �k1 1467.E +1464.5 14 9. I +1473.3 +7472.4 1468.5 + 1460.6 �❑ M ❑❑❑❑ 1 . 1469.E + 1465.5 1462.5 1461.5 1 1475.E I 1 1470.5 + + + + + + I 0 ��,5 I I 1475.1 + - ------------ 0 + 14525 45+ 14� '. ❑RT 1 I 1 7174.8 1 I I I I ---------- PREPARED FOR: MANNING HOMES 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TEL: (949) 250-4200 PREPARED BY: LEGEND: NOTES: NODE 50 NODE NUMBER 1. ALL SOILS GROUP A INV.: 1438 SURFACE ELEVATION 2. RAINFALL DATA: NOAA ATLAS 14 MADO L E 9302 PITTSBURGH AVE,SUITE 230 EL: 1450 PIPE INVERT ELEVATION 3. 100-YEAR DEVELOPED FLOW RATES DETERMINED USING AES RANCHO CUCAWNI CA.91730 Q100=20 CFS 100-YR FLOW RATE SOFTWARE; RATIONAL METHOD HYDROLOGY FOR SAN PHONE:909.481.6322 B E R N A R D I N O COUNTY Engineering Communities for Life FAX. 909.481.6320 L=450' FLOW LENGTH FLOW PATH 1.13 AC. SUBAREA (ACRES) TENTATIVE SUBAREA BOUNDARY T CT NOm 20334 GLPIPE RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 WATER QUALITY INFILTRATION - PIPE - PIPE SYSTEM - GL PIPE - �O co SUBTT 20334 co PRELIMINARY HYDROLO Y MAP 0 z DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q SHEET C- 1 0 OF 11 > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w WILSON AVENUE > > �F Z Z S� - _ R .m •.M l Q w Z N Q BANYAN STREET M O w BLUE o a - - - ° DRIVE - - PROJECT Z SITE 3' ia a y : z -° •�. �" STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY k, , '�P,f t+.,, ' f'Q...,> �, � b �', S a0p t >, d ..M "7.0."• "'`Y+* �a» .-. " ' 'y�,`s:�' '�. Ile '`': i'h•'y 4\a MY.t�w�«r.` .+ sue',+., z ..a?Lr+r t a+.:�YG. i[•..>•_�._ }4"'i a r`Ax �w" �'. ,• 'as a � :fiC �e�ts r.. V :` �� :�,� -�..a ,r. ,+y �..� .-.,-,-,.:_w ,Fret-,` rs" 1 '�,- '4°T.,IJIl �'dsae �' V f • '� ��'� 1 �.F k '7-•e�� �. ^.�A.fi"'� ��~ � .s� a-- 7 WON 1 f ❑ICINI ❑Y MA❑ 4 N.T.S. a + > J. y l j.u`'�y yob"-� - _ ,•e w!2Y� I� ✓ Y i �. II'r �, ..♦ ' � 1 itlld� �� �� ,�„r PHOTOGRAPH 1 PHOTOGRAPH 2 PHOTOGRAPH 3 f5�6 ° - CO 5a�.5 CONS f977 ,ya 4B5< ,P 75085 n T + 174 + f981 Q,/�, © © ©� 9., 1493E 'f492.s+ �^^-, + � CONC � 148J4 1753 li 1502.E T JXG 49T.4 LJ o + 7507.2 ° _V- 14852 Q 11482♦ o I4efs 15049 o O e f507.8 1507.4 7508.7 '„M' 7 7 150370 1502.5 1501.5 1744' �4 1489.5 1485.4 1484.7 7484.J /4652 74Bf.1 T�•� 14B0.8 1499.E +, 1485..5 1(83.7 o I/481.8 ,-)9B23 1500.E 149B.6 14955 /49J 7490.4 74885 - 1995.E 5 BANYAN ST k�o T 1501.4 ,��� 1499.5 1 9 1 /A3_ 1504. tt 15115 111496. ,+F /50J 14 1 ' ��93. .7 7489-� 1488.1 /486.7 1^+ 148J8 + �i+ez9 uea2 14ays t: O• O I � o o �j0 0 t� > >;\ a�' • • CONIC WALL Fes: 1502.4 1(90.4 148J3 1SOS I + 7499.7 11497,4 149J5 14B75 + 7480E WR5 7, r .9 J 1501.5 1500E T .+ �1491.s �14BS7 14B4.7 T o T T --3 I�/495.7 148J2.4 +14753 130fk4 + + l49J5 1491.6 l4846 1482E + 1f76.5 1495 4 + �- 197E 1 � 15a7.s 1503.5 1500.3 /1856 74746+ + 1500.7 1497.5 + + + + 1470.1 1492.1 1489.E JiBJS 1482.5 RAJ 501.E I I + 149BB 14 f(96.20 Q 149 5 + + +1f87.4 14a5.5 + + S 475 O 1474.3 ROCK LIGHT 7 1472.5 e1 o J4eo Y i. , 1496.9 1489.5 BRUSH 1480.6 r4.9,x7 481s + .- .✓; '"' nv may,* 'A-1 f�, iC;;,.y -:li',�lJ-+.s.77 -..'4't''�"' _ 7J 4. +1(9. �® + OQ +1490.6 + +1486.5 14B46 1482.5 +1 BLIGHT RUSH OBSCURED +1473.7 147J4 �- I /470.3 '7� n` .• ''e1*5 G' 2 { 7499.E + + + 1494.E Ul It, 14787 _ BRUSH 4j0 149B4� 1f94.5 J4B86 14645 7479.5 +1478.41971.4 � + O 14B6.f 1482.8 1(Ba.7 1469.5 + 1496.2 `' 1 •.', t t. ° /4955 O o 0 1496.3 t0 74957 �t496.6 + + + + + + + + 495} + 14BG5 1f827 /47 1476.E l p + '� + j/ S g - - /494.9 .� 146B7 R_1 149A5 /49.�5 + 1495.2 -I-44 7480.5 147BB 1470.5 _ .- ..: 1 / 1 + -� -� If954 0 14B7.5 + + + + + + ..i 1497.7 I 1 0 + + 7466.3 a 4i�3 1 j'Ps .,. +...«•`• o'.. iR<i:'., , ,..h„ _ - - - I DEBRIS p[ 477.1 14636 + c +�L y' 1489.5 I 1166.E 14928 �® 77 1484.E 14825 /480.3 147B5 + Now".7 + ,4677 g M 4653 /4652 / + 1487E 14s7.J �A90 7t -- - -- + rf92s TANK � Q €r.�,��l �„a, a°� ��at§' �r`'�"'�':�.� _ + 1u2� •t49zB + � 14ss2 �,} 14B4.4 1'� 14762 1472.< .c.•! 'iw ,'^`�°`-,a"�:M f "c*'I(u v # "�' ,`, _ - r..., - - +148& 2s+ 14777 1<74. + ,... / Syr.. { i, x i. \ ,•. ejf p I4B7.6 �� + +14s71 ,� 148B5 +146 �p /481.4 477.5 g f49J4 1 7.3 +If71.5 + + { 479.7 'f=°' H {t 148J5 f482.s + + 1475.s .i �{ CONC + + +1(7J6 +1472.6 , 'd'rb^y.." ]490.5 + 746J 7 ��T 149a6 +1489 14s4.s a y„ l d 1486.5 1479.E /4725 �t .;. ' +. 14BJ6 /49as + 1(77.7 14756 1 A470 f fi, 4877 + + + T 6 + 1461. y 40 ~' µ` 14ef.s + 147Js 1470,E �?«• 1 �I XX H 1 5, bb T' Yp l ( 1 ,4.,� iF• pt DEBRIS ---- 14B1.s 146as+ +1477.4 /472s 1146J4 ..• YJfe.,.. w° w..L. `r.,_..a.. '�L"f .. i of. 1478.s +1(75( -1_ 1� - .r. 1 l� "� '�;�,'�► I 9Bzs .}- �- 147a3 146e4 +14B75 1486.5+ +1484.4 1<BJ4 +1479.6 + + +1471.6 �_ +/4686 PHOTOGRAPH 4 PHOTOGRAPH 5 PHOTOGRAPH b +1fB6.3 +14B,5,5 +1484.4 f4866 1 1477.7 1476.E 1474.4 1472.8 +1471.5 +146B7 + + 22 1 1f66.5 V 1 1482.4+ + +1478,8 + + + + �- �!' BRUSH III/��4''II6a7 1 5 1469.7 L 4 +148J4 +14Ba3 +147B.6 14755 + 14725 1470.5 + +14685 14i6•J 11457.7 ,�'s•'��,a 9 � ,45 +14Bf.1 1481.E 1476.5 + 1474.5 + 1469.5 T 1461.7 0 n +. + + ry 1481.5 1476.8 147.6 1464,5 .fa r r f4BJ4 ' I 1 J5 +1482.4 + 1479.4 1477.6 + 1474,6 +147J5 + +1470.4 /467.J 1f656 + /459.7 +146B6 + 4565 O + + + + + ^ 1459.7 I 0 I 7485,5 +1479.5 1477.J 14745 7477.5 146,5.7 + 455 CUNC 1 l439.J + +1475.6 + + 1469.E + +1466.3 -}- k if 4_ +1481.5 +1480.1 1(s85 1471.E •�- u y �( i,l � 7458E '9. - 1479.5 14753 NA1y 1472..5 1461.3 + 14554 y �i lI7B.5 + + +7(7a6 J46BB + 1466.5 7461.J +146J4 + + 14` T + 1476.8 73.4 1467,J + 0 14BSs I + +1(77.7 + + �- + f456:6 T" k r, r R DEBRIS +1476.4 14734-- 46,5 ,, 25 1464.4+ 146 /45J277 DEBRIS J• + 1472J 1477.7 1 s 1474.5 + 7467.E �5 +1476,9 • + + f169.5 + + ��� r I 1480.5 I1 l-f4 1456.3 Any 1f524 74754 /f74.J +147J 7471.5 1470.E 1469.5 +1467.8 + 1+7464.7 +1463.4 +74625 +1961.6 +145J5 7'�41' 0+795J4 T 145s.J } S 452.6 VV 1(67J M 0 747J.J 1(724 1467.E +146<3 1463.5 + �' ^' S �I' zi'r 4 "'h yi IW -� 1 +.,• ,i - - 9.6 1(656 25 1.5 +146 + }3 1(751 +1470.5 +146 + +f46 +146 06 1451.5 1�� YWt�--IVI f'FF-tom I u _ ..- air- ,' � 4 '�' +�7, '4� L I 1',e, p •4" i F ,:p ':li,s,' 1,, - ' z - - elE a 4j + 1' 74s - 17sti,2�'I :i.., f �1 r,,y".° a•4 .� �. .' �1:ytr'. �: {. �. _ .:. ., - - 454 I]I,i tv'�i1)yt>,l�' y F'. >a'• 1j 1('' ',rb $ �2' ra '.I(, .. "•4 f;. _ t+ ���V'SS_ a _ - ..�'.1 � �y� .:j 'R'all 80 40 0 80 160 9 ,k• i''.�' ��!! T %', �vi� i1`. ,� J•.,,�'.� !! ,1 ,.11 _ .. J�� -. _ t'r - - O n i .;. -'t.�• p.,•' _ z SCALE: 1 =80' 75 � ''�i J t .✓�` •7 � r - - '-*ram' PHOTOGRAPH 7 PHOTOGRAPH 8 PHOTOGRAPH 9 PREPARED FOR: MANNING HOMES 20151 SW BIRCH STREET SUITE 150 NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 92660 CONTACT: CRAIG KOZMA TEL: (949) 250-4200 y PREPARED BY: MADOLE 9302 Plll'SBURGIi AVE,SUITE 230 RANCHO CUC CA.91730 AMONGA, PHONES 909.481.6322 r _ _ • :M' Engineering Communities for Life FAX.• 909.481.6320 g S 7 . TENTATIVE TRACT : i t NO . 20334 _ RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 -17 Z� SITE PHOTOS CD v .. r, SUBTT 203340 z 11 PHOTOGRAPH 10 PHOTOGRAPH 11 PHOTOGRAPH 12 DATE PREPARED: JANUARY, 2021 Q SHEET C- 1 1 OF 11 > CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA z w U) Z HOA LANDSCAPE NOTE: Q HOA MAINTAINED LANDSCAPING INCLUDES: a W LOTS A, B, C & D. Q W SOUTH PERIMETER SLOPE AT LOTS 1-9. Z W PARKWAYS AT EAST AVENUE AND GOLDENLOCK PLACE. a (n Q W J V J W (n AB 1881 IRRIGATION CALCULATION 0 - MAWA = IEToXO.62XOB5 x LA + (O.45) x (SLA) a Z MAWA = x 80,155) Q MAWA = (34.95) (44,085) PRELIMINARY LANDSCAIPE PLANSJ MAWA = 1,540,018 GALLONS/FEAR EAWU = (56.37) (0.(v2) (.8) (SOO) (HZI) (.8U Nigh Turf = 33,828 GALJYI�. �EAWU = C56.37) (0.62) (.8) (15,020) 0 (HZ2) (15) High Turf o FAST AVENUE 17 = 559,946 GAL_/YR_ QQ N U 7t EAWU = (56.3'7) (0.6,2) (.2) (31,931) (HZ3) (.81) Low shrub TRACT 20334 CIA 321,382 GAL./YR. O U � EAWU = (56.37) (0.62) (.5) (26,218) FTC W Med shrub (_81) RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CA �`'1 CL) W 565,62(3 GAL./YR_ G L� 0 E~ TOTAL F-1 Q = O EAWU = 1,456,�85 GALLONS/YEAR (91 51; of MAWA) 7 U w z MANNINGHOM S Z Z z N Ld HYDROZONE LEGEND z F-11 z ZONE NO./DESCRIPTION WUCOLS #4 20151 S .W. BIRCH STREET STE. 150 NEWPORT BEACH CA, 92660 949-250-4200 Q HYDROZONE #1 HIGH M W LAWN EDGE I DRIP Y O z � w HYDROZON E #2 HIGH LAWN / ROTORS o HYDROZONE #3 PROJECT MANAGER: CRAIG KOZMA 0:: TREES & SHRUBS I DRIP LOW [� rn z w HYDROZONE #3 MEDIUM N TREES & SHRUBS I DRIP w X w w 0 0 w 0 0 0 GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP `N�0 c- Q y N p y Q U Uj LQ �M 3 p Q V) �N U d cLJ s��jll �c SAP o 0 w w � m L- 1 TITLE SHEET z N N Li HIGH FIRE ZONE / CITY PLANTING RESTRICTION NOTES: aU 1. PLANT FOLIAGE (at maturity) SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 12" TO ANY BUILDING. L-2 & L-3 OVERALL 20 SC.ALE PLANS, L) z o 2. NO SHRUBS OR VINE FOLIAGE (at maturity) SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 5' TO ANY BUILDING WINDOW. SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS Q -6 ¢ > z a 3. MAXIMUM SHRUB GROUPING IS THREE (3), AND A MINIMUM 5' SPACE MUST BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN GROUPINGS. L-4 TYPICAL FRONT YARD PLANTING w � .> w 4. MAXIMUM TREE GROUPING IS THREE (3) AND A MINIMUM 20' SPACE MUST BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN GROUPINGS. Q'" Uj M .--� 2 Uj 5. LOW SHRUB/GROUND COVERS 4" OR LESS IN HEIGHT MAY BE ALLOWED TO GROW TOGETHER WITH NO GROUPINGS & SITE DETAILS t w OR SPECIAL SPACING REQUIRED. . = w WILSON AVENUE ~ � � " a .. o 6. THE PLANT PALETTE MUST EXCLUDE ALL CITY PROHIBITED FIRE ZONE PLANT MATERIALS. zz N ¢ o z w w N z z z WATER EFFICIENT IRRIGATION DESIGN NOTES 1. AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER SHALL BE STATE OF THE ART TECHNOLOGY WITH DUAL PROGRAMS AND START TIMES ����� o FOR EFFICIENT WATER APPLICATIONS. IT SHALL BE CONNECTED TO AN ON-SITE WEATHER SENSOR DEVICE. Q < 2. CONTROLLER SHALL BE CAPABLE OF WATER BUDGETING AND PROGRAMMING BASED UPON LOCAL o EVAPOTRANSPIRATION RATES FROM EITHER "ON-SITE" WEATHER SENSOR OR FROM A LOCAL CIMIS WEATHER BANYAN (SUMMIT) J Uj w STATION. z m ~ _ o 3. AUTOMATIC FLOW SENSING PROTECTION WITH MASTER VALVE SHUT-OFF. PROJECT ^ Uj N BLUE `� 4. RAIN SENSING DEVICE CAPABLE OF AUTOMATIC SYSTEM SHUTDOWN. THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED C��l J z O a w � � 5. VALVE DESIGN SHALL INCORPORATE SEPARATE HYDROZONES FOR TURF, SHRUB AND SLOPE AREAS BASED UPON WI LDLAN D-URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA SITE DRIVE �`" N z N/E AND S/E SUN/SHADE EXPOSURES. c.� 0O 0 Uj cn 6. OPTIONAL MOISTURE SENSING DEVICES FOR SPECIFIC VALVE PROGRAMMING BASED UPON SOIL TYPE, ET, CROP z z 5 ~ COEFFICIENT FACTOR AND PRECIPITATION RATES FOR EACH HYDROZONE. CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, METHODS AND AUTOMATIC � Q 7. EACH HYDROZONE WILL BE DESIGNED WITH PCS SCREENS AND CHECK VALVES IN HEADS TO PREVENT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE w w w } OVER-SPRAY AND CONTROL WATER RUN-OFF/WASTE. o WITH CHAPTER 7A OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE, STATE ROUTE 210 FREEWAY U 8. HYDROZONES SHALL BE DESIGNED WITH MATCHED PERCIPITATION RATE NOZZLES FOR OPTIMUM WATER a APPLICATION. SECTION R337 OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, z AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 49-1 . 9. SHRUB IRRIGATION DESIGN WILL INCORPORATE POINT TO POINT DRIP DEVICES AND/OR BUBBLERS AND LOW Z 0 GALLAGE' NOZZLES TO USE WATER WISELY. Y, %- 10. SYSTEM PROGRAMMING SHALL OCCUR IN EARLY MORNING HOURS WHEN WIND LEVELS AND SUN ARE ® w MINIMAL TO PREVENT PLANT TRANSPIRATION. N O Ld w Uj N w 11. ALL IRRIGATION DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT AB1881 REQUIREMENTS. 0) z N O Y U w U Q Op 2 (N o U o U) Uj Uj ALL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING STREET TREES, SHALL BE Q INSTALLED PER THE APPROVED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY o Q DIAL TOLL FREE BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PLANS, THE STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS SHALL GOVERN. z 1 -800-227-2600 SHEET AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG L- 1 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OF 4 �\ CONSTRUCTION MATE:RIIALS, METHODS AND AUTOMATIC: FIRE SPRINKLER THIIS PIROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DEESIGNA TE:D MATURE SPECIMEN OLIVE TREE �� �� � SYSTEMS ARE l 0 BIE IN COIVIPLIANICE: WITH CHAP TER 7A OF CALIFORNIA , �� WILD LAN D-U RIBAN I NT•ERF=ACEE f=IRE: AREA Z \ ,p BUILDING CODE, SECTION_ R337 OF THE CALIFORNIA R E S I D►E N T IAIL CODE_, -- ----- ---- --------- -- Q — � AND FIRE: DISTRICT S1 AIV C>AIRC) 49—'1 . } —j Lu �5' OFF=-SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT A� SECTION C� Q �a• > w/ CONCRETE "VEE" DITCH _� —��--- LOTS 14 MAINTAINED REAR SLOPES C� 40' 400' 40 20 Lu V r n- C , r1� `�• -- —ram --- '•s— —=_- ��'�� +i. -- ^r • �� �� ��— ��; —�`` �� /�- z J MOUND 770 INCLUDE BOULDERS,, �: � .f �'"�r f' sZ,�J �,�.. '�„�. ;�..f '��. �,.f �•.j•.f' FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUBS & _ '�'�..1 `� r 1 (-' —� 2:1 SLOPE GROUND COVERS L \� 17 •w�4' r � ..•Oa �m' r — � I • � % \ - ------2:1 SLOPE ALA - i_ ■■■■■■ �, , . � � , ,¢ i� �• i c SEE SHEET L-�� FOR PLAIN �- TYPICAL 3. �4 �� • ' �`` v,; `� '!�i► FRONT YARD PLAN1-ING o •_• ` , O -- _ ELEVATION _, — — — L— -- ALFNOTYPICAL. PROJECT ENTRY CORNIER— FF-1485.77 SCALE • PAD=1485.1 0o Lp EAST AVE. THEME Wa ILL --- — 1=F=1483.37 2 FF=1479.07 PAD:=1482.7 V PAD=1478.4 „ 40' 40' FF=1481.27 nn ^ f 6 CONCRETE HEADIER PAD-148CL6 ' _ - GF-148;Z.70 GF=14'78.40 F C — -- - _ � GF=1485.1.0 _ : . v ■ -- F .�..� � - : . . ,T " L L' L' -- � :: � � _ 1 � .L 1 Ali �� _..-- •. .NIX i / s; \ ■ �,I =,II •✓t�—fie _ �5 —� .e� e�— �' — h LOT B = — J, �, 14.' 4, '4� j 4 � � � � � � J J, J, J. 14001 . � N, J, JV .� - �? � o ■��� \, HOA MAINTAINED i .� J .E .� PROJECT ENTRY CO R N E R �' ' , ': .. . �� ��______=— -= ____� � ---- -�� — —,— � �--y - — -- - —=. ----� �� --- ---- - � � — — .• -- .— .— - — . ._:� • _ —,— � V � � � 00 L_ � w/ SPECIMEN O LI'V E TR E:E .vy J, y z � / J � SEE: ELEVATION ''A'' ABOVE _ ______= __________ ____ / � —''�_='� —= —�I`_ � �, —�, \1, —\1, — \1, — J — �, �, — — .�— �— .E' _ g, �' _1 � � _ h CITRUS GROVE FALLOW SOIL �� 6" CONCRETE (HEADER ( r / �� w/ TOP DRESSING MULCH HOA PRIVATE LU Z rl--- �I MAINTAINED MAINTAINED uu _HOA_ PRIVATE _ �����E o -�—MAINTAINED MAINTAINED ' ET �� <� L 6" CONCRETE HE1`�DER _ ��� �� ' STREET LIGHT (TYP) �� 3 w �' FIRE HYDRANT (TYP) 6'J LU -and IL 31s; No LU PROJECT ENTRY' C 0 R NI E R —,�—,4, --- — — — — \ —�- - �'J — w/ SPECIMEN OLIVE TREE / �� '� S E:E ELEVATION "A" ABOVE .� J, �= .� J, v .� .v .v �' J �/ J. .� ,,� .� .� .� .� J, >� J, J, w 04 _ _ : 77 7 . / ✓ ✓ GF=1483.20 : .: : ' ' ' . G 4 �� _ EAST AVE. STREI=T TREES '� ��/� — Ld GF=1480.20 GF=1478.20 joy (MATCH EXISTING) ao �� SN4'1`, c� L \■ o I _ ;-_: w �— 2 2 w — --- FF=1482.67 �� --- — I ckf PAD=1482.0 F'F=1480„87 C7 o �7 / '' �• 1F PAD=1480.2 I ' FF=1478.87 PAD=1478.2 �� `�' c� < t.� 'xb• '"' F F=1483.87 11 G/1 a ONa PAD=14183.2 --- C� _ IL LOT A HOA MAINTAINED � � � � -- — ;,�,•, -- �� �� �� � � ' Z z _, a, w Z 00 a0 °io r NOTE: + ,.�E E SHEET L G FOR PLAN 1-T,. P I CAL o �� ¢ o � EAST AVE. THEIME WALL �, - ,_ - x �* 1 1 L3 I '- F RO NT YA IR D PLANTING i �-- a. cr w Z i o CITRUS GROVE / FALLOW SOIL ►2:1 SLOPE 2:1 SLOPE ----------- w/TOP DRESSING MULCH I I 5 :; Q o e I � �� ,r '��• ,s, �,�•� ..r• • r• {.,r� I� ^r,•� �`+`'� ,r , � �`���� ''�� �� �'� � � �� '�"� � �`f'� �'.r`' � �"r` ��� 'ti+r`• y. ' WOOD POST ,--, \� I ■ .� ,�;',';; --�' �. 1: =< (:� T ,, z' r(,I, -' ,:.' l a MEN co STEP-THROUGH o ; Y� . .� . -.;.f ,� , • ,,_ ;<,- ; ,,; • :,,';_ .,, Z i LJ CONCRETE , i , DRIVEWAY AY APRON c, _ _ w. cu ,40 In 40.. 1 ' D.G. A I I-r �, 40 40 --- -- �I _ 4) � �.0 o rNEV DITCH I15' D.G. TRAIL f 5 G LCC)N/ C'RE E V '�••.-� � �r•...�r.rt-. •F.��•r�—�H�—t��rX- �r•r.�M �F��N� ��rr �••r.�fr��y�E -�I.•F��.••r��--r.� �fr ��F �FF-�r+� �••.-�f. .ft� �sr-` fti�f� E� �-��r•rfr. My�ifFH��IF �IFrr•r'� ff� � rr�� � COMMUINITYTIRAILACCESS' CONCRETE "VEE:" DITCH L 11-1-mSEE CITY DETAIL ON SHEET IL-3 _ 18 1�',' GATE 2-RAIL PVC FENCE �� SECTION w (SEE PHOTOS BELOW) —� E' HOA MAINTAINED D.G. TRAIL_ & SLOPES N Z \ �3 --- LOTS 1-5 0 0 + HOA MAINTAINED D.G. TRAIL & SLOPES N = PRECAST CONCRETE CAP AND FINIAL LOTS 1-5 w o �; E L E VAT I O N — ----- — �_2 --- 0 -6" EAST AVE. THEME COLUMN w/ RIEAL. RIVER-ROCK: �— ,c. ---------------------- �� 6 EAST AVE. THEME MASONRY WALL w/ STUCCO FINISH �1 - -- -- —h FOR PLANTING LEGEND / PALETTE LOT 1 � � 1 STUCCO CAP )Qr -- ----- --- -- ---------- --- -- --r — — _1. 0 _— _ �-- _ - - T--� -_ - ��� ��T SEE S H I_E_T L_ �3 �� ZLJ w ■ _® 0 (p . . . L . . . . ® cV w —_' � •• WALL / FELEGEND � 1 '•'•• • ' �� � I SEE DETAILS ON L 4)NCE ( m - - -- -- FACE WALL Fu COLUMN■ i I W vi I z 6 TAN SPLIT 7. 7J J w it ■C �� IEAST AVE, THEME WALL 84 STONE C;OLUNIN �Q , > .. C� o i cn . . . . . . . . _. L-OT A AaT ,.SIDE &. LOT E (NORTH SIDE) /■ , .. .. :. .. .. .. .. :. .. .. .. 2,-RAIL PVC: FENCE - ' _ .F (E `' ` -) (N E) Q .• .. .. - AL ,/ SIDE YARDS 6 TAN PRECISION BLOCK W L �� W ( \ y 6 TUBULAR STEEL FENCE EQUAL EQUAL \ a --- -- — --- ----- \ 36" TUBULAR S1EEI_ GATE w/' MESH PRIVACY BACKING AT ALL SIDE YARDS Y 1 CIS :+ - „ 2 RAIL PVC FENCE (SOUTH P.L.) z 4 a SHEET It P46 ir I CONmt_w CRETE E L E V,AT I O N / EE A S T AV EE_T H E:M EE "'ALL --_ NOTE_ V E I D I T C F �1_ ----------------CE NO SCALE @ LOT AL EAST SIDE & LOT B NORTH SIDE: EAST AVE. THEME WALL �x COLUMN DIESIGN l O MATCH 15' TRAIT_ EXAMPLES OF D.G. EQUESTRIAN 1-RAILS WITH 2-RAIL VINYL FENCING Lm 2 E:XISTING IIMF'ROVEN/1ENTS ON WEST SIDE OF EAST AVE. ON BOTH SIDES OF TRAIL OF ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, METHODS AND AUTO IVIATIC; FIRE SPRINKLER THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED SYSTEMS ARE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 7A► OF CALIFORNIA WII_DLAND-LIRBANI INI1 ERFACE FIRE AREA Z SECTION BUILDING CODE' SECTION R337 OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, - --------- Q 5' OFF-SITE DRAINAGE EASEMENT A PRIVATE MAINTAINED REAR SLOPES w/ CONCRETE NEE" DITCH �-3 AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 49-1 . >- JLOTS 10-13 li 40' 40' 40' --- 40 -- ------ 40 � 40, ;------ vz Ilk - • ul CITRUS GROVE / FALLOW SOIL �/ 0 2:1 SLOPE: I w/ TOP DRESSING MULCH� 10-\ Q. Z 13 1 :2 1C Q,< k- p j >d=q or 1 R -- ,✓ ,✓ .f r.�.✓ ✓ ' ' 2IR FF=1470.67FF=1476.97 PAD=1.476.3 rvR C�.h ', ``^ ■ o \ _C4,00j I FF=1472.77 FIF=1474.87 �",,./ �,,.f • c l --- � PAD=1472.1 �� PAD=1474.2 .� > ! I u GF=1470.00 •��NNNNNNNNNNII VIND"N ""__" _� • _ GF==14)6.30 7-7: /'ram I 1'�� - / LOT D �> (HOA MAINTAINED) �.... I �14 LU -� TURF - 5,000 s .ift. u J/ J/ � J/ J/ CD Nl• .1/ J/ .1/ .1/ 14/ .1/ `1/ J/ 14/ \l/ J/ J/ J�l .1/ .1/ 14/ .1/ .1/ 14/ .1/ \l/ J/ = o H /G -�--a• �" - -= - --�- - - - -= . - --�- - -�- = --�= - - -yam -�= ----- - - - - - -7 Z Z N � J! Nv II I a ------------ _ _ _ ------------ o Z VNi LEI_- *74 I Q E`NN_4 Z CONCRETE PRIVATE PROJECT ENTRY CORNER M C W CONCRETE HEADER I G• AL" STRFJ�I,T� DRIVEWAY -� MAINTAINED MAINTAINED ; w/ SPECIMEN OLIVE TREE rSTREET LIGHT (TY'P) 1 SEE ELEVATION A / L-2 N z FIRE HYDRANT (TY'P) IWI z0 _ 1 � l --- IWI �� - -� --_ - . . -- -- -- -- --- - -� immin - � __ _ C/� - _■■■ ��- �- ■■■ ■� - \' 4, / J/ JV 4, ,J/ � 14/ \1/� 14/ \1/ \1/ 14/ 14/ � ILLI 1 J/ 4 J Jl/ l/ \l/ 1l/ I N (n ILLI (� 1 1/ .1 1 4/ J/ Ny �L I - Ile / I �� x I� _-� 1 �1/ �1/ J/ �l/ �l/ mil/ J/ �1/ J/ mil/ • .. :• w .4/ Nj, w / G 11/ .4/ 5' CONCRETE WALK w / J N. 110, L BIKE RACK I = 0 -- l� _ �l/ �1/ �l/ �l/ �1/ J/ �1/ �l/ �1/ h�"1 0 GF=147,2.80 �..� -= GF=14fi9.50 :. GF=1467.50 . .I. - .I/ _ .I/ �/�� .1/ \ F ����`of,T * d�yd of GI 1471.1)0 WATER QUALITY .� �/ �/ �/ . �� ��`1 N oN �� o ? • / INFILTRATION SYSTEM ► Lo F F=1473.47 2 �� r•1 .4/ � �l/ .1/ .4/ \1/ 14/ .1/ �l/ \1/ �¢`f 1 > o _ FF='L470.17 .{ , y, / hl a. �� =N �� o PA,D-1.472.8 FF=1471.67 PAD=1469.5 s/ .1/ I, ,1/ ,1/ S I PAD=1471.0 • , o --- --- FF=1468.17 0BENCH & TRASH LOT (C --- -- --- --- -- PAD=1467.5 • J (H(HOA MAIN' •1• •1• •i• • �� o -- -- --- - RECEPTACLE Not fAl N E D) PAD=1465.5 N - -� ___ •1• y .1/ J TURF = 11,000 sq.ft. `' N BENCH & TRASH H U z 0 RECEPTACLE < �• I w it � I i �o■ \ .�/ �/ .� .� � . . • ■ � �-- �, •" � w ry _ OC- _ U I� / �1 \ Y ► I 1 x 0 LO 12 --man 2:1 SI 'E � 0 wtil o O z • • • • �, ....'• • �• WOOD POST ■■■■■■ N • __ - STEP-THROUGH z INA .... T -._ . . NII NNNNI Abw COMMUNITY TRAIL ACCESS _ �:, ..'�. - - SEE CITY DETAIL BELOW 20 I ! _�40� 40 40 'AT BASIN CAI CH.BAST I C> . 15 D.G. TRAIL - - CH- -15' D GTRAIL� CONCRETE "VEE" DITCH •.���..�rly�l ir:Fa �rt�s*... � �•,1 ��-.y.: .. "y�� ..■ �-r �.a� o-.� ry CONCRETE DRIVEWAY nu .� APRON : N HOA MAINTAINED D.G. TRAIL & SLOPES TREE PALETTE 2-RAIL PVC FENCE 40' m. 2-RAIL PVC FENCE LOTS 6-9 g SECTION (SEE PHOTOS SHT. L-2) --- - - - PLAN SIZE WUCOLS 12' 18' o PRIVATE ELEV. PRIMARY FRONT YARD TREE: w , 15• LOCAL FEEDER TRAIL V1 "A"SPANISH OLEA EUROPAEA OLIVE(FRUITLESS) 24"box STD. L POST TO CHAIN GATE OPEN 20 SPLIT RAIL SCHINUS MOLLE CALIFORNIA PEPPER PARK,PROJECT ENTRY, AND FRONT YARDS z a SOIL SURFACE RADIUS OF 6' "B"CALIFORNIA RANCH CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR TREE 24"box [- . + yr GATE WITH STEP THROUGH YEACH SIDE OF BARRICADE WTURF 20'FROM CURB FACE QUERCUS VIRGINIANA SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 24"box �. ,� --- z o BLOCK WALL W NOTE: o " fLd EUCALYPTUS SPP. EUCALYPTUS SPP. MOW STRIP "C"FARM HOUSE PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE 24"box M SEE SHEET L•-4 FOR PARK BENCH TRASH REFER TO TREE PALETTE AT RIGHT REFER TO TREE PALETTE AT RIGHT PLANTERAI2EA n PLANTER AREA CUPANIAANACARDIOIDES CARROTWOOD 24"box M RECEPTACLE, AND BIKE RACK INFORMATION - 1 CONCRETE HEADER N TRAIL SHRUB GROUND COVER AREAS -- --- H- _ _ SECONDARY FRONT YARD TREE: 0 of j PARKWAY "A"SPANISH LAGERSTROEMIA F.'NATCHEZ' WHITE CRAPE MYRTLE 24"box M a o PVC FENCE -CONCRETE DRIVE �6'CURB 3 PRIVATE w APPROACH 12'MIN. STREET B'CALIFORNIA RANCH LAGERSTROEMIA F.'BILOXI PINK CRAPE MYRTLE 24"box M STREET, HOA&c PRIVATE SLOPES OVER 3'HT.): MAINTAINED HOA MAINTAINED PER CITY OF R.C. HOA PRIVATE STD.DWG.101-A z MAINTAINED MAINTAINED "C"FARM HOUSE LAGERSTROEMIA F.'MUSKOGEE' LAVENDER CRAPE MYRTLE 24"box M SHRUBS SIZE/SPACING WUCOLS � O o �j 6' SPLIT FACE WALL „ ` 20' z a METAL PLATE TO STOP THE TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDES STAR JASMINE 1 GAL@ 24"O.C. M N GATE FROM SWINGING INTO t THE PUBLIC R.O.W.AND 1/4"THICK METAL TOFF-SITE DRAINAGE: T PLATE WELDED FENCE POST ROSMARINUS O.'HUNTINGTON BLUE' TRAILING ROSEMARY 1 GAL@ 24"O.C. L �O N PROVIDE SUPPORT TO GATE. TO UPRIGHT PIPE OR ENTRY ACCENT'TRI?E: MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM G EASEMENT BLOCK WALL FLAT STEEL PLATE TO BE ALLOWS GATE BLOCK WALL - [\ N 1 } � A WELDED TO TOP OF POST. OLEA ERROPAEA OLIVE TREE ORCHARD SPECIMEN UNDER SLIDE PUTAH C REEK' MYOPORUM I GAL@ 24"O.C. L `J O � w •J r `/ w Lu ` _ I 10 6- _ RAPHIOLEPIS INDICA'SPRINGTIME' [NDIAN HAWTHORN 5 " a z a' 1 8'-3" CALLISTEMON'LITTLE JOHN' DWARF CALLISTEMON 5 GAL 42"O.C. M 1Jn ci 5 O J i 4" PARK TREE: @ K I -- STEP THROUGH,SEE DODONAEA VISCOSA'PURPUREA' HOPSEED BUSH 5 GAL 5' O.C. L N O ' a 41J'2" STD.DWG.1007E • ULMUS PARVIFOLIA SEMPERVIRENS EVERGREEN ELM @ W z 21 MYRTUS COMMUNIS'COMPACTA' DWARF MYRTUS 5 GAL@ 36"O.C. M QI ~ m Q CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR TREE 36"box t /"1 CONCRETE 51/2• ., XYLOSMA CONGESTUM SHINY XYLOSMA 5 GAL @ 5'O.C. M U Q O W "_ � NEE" DITCH I 6' SPLIIT FACE_ WALL•- ,v^ 4 I I N PHOTINIA FRASERI PHOTINIA 5 GAL @ 5'O.C. M N p CI u voi 2:1 SLOPE I ' 2:1 S Lb P E % I I ESCALLONIA FRADESII PINK ESCALLONIA 5 GAL @ 4'O.C. M a L, /� /�/ PERIMETER SKYLINE TREE: -16 6 �, NEED 1/4"METAL PLATE / // // / / EUCALYPTUS SIDEROXYLON ROSEA RED IRON BARK 15 gal. 30'-40'o.c.AS SHOWN, of 2-RAIL_ PVC FENCE FOR SUPPORT. N, Ld ` - ( '��` I N , -} EUCALYPTUS NICHOLLI WILLOW LEAF PEPPERMINT 15 gal. MAINTAINED w/ WALL / FENCE LEGEND (SEE DETAILS ON SHEET L 4) ■ �., h: ✓ FILL POST WITH CONCRETE. 12 FILL Posr WITH corlcRE'rE. EUCALYPTUS POLYANTHEMOS SILVER DOLLAR GUM 15 gal. 20'DIA.TREE CANOPY a �I �r BLDG. PAD NOTES: 6' TAN SPLIT FACE WALL & COLUMN cr_ 0O } v> 1.GATE CONSTRUCTED OF 2 3/8"GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE. ■ WIZ -' I ••• `®' N 2.HINGE CREATED BY WELDING CROSS MEMBERS TO A 2 7!8"GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE EAST AVE. THEME WALL & STONE E COLUMN M Nof J SLEEVE WITH CAP SLIPPED OVER UPRIGHT GATE POST Y O O 3.4 t 3-SINK POSTS 40".GATE SHALL NOT SWING INTO PUBLIC R.O.W. EAST AVENUE STREET TREE: Z al 15' CLEAR D.G. TRAIL 4.CHAIN SHALL BE3/8"X1314'X11/4'MILD STEEL ATI8"LONG 00 GEIJERAPARVIFLORA AUSTRALIAN WILLOW @ LOT A (EAST SIDE) & LOT B (NORTH SIDE) of BLDG. PAD d 5.LOCK SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY. . 6' TAN PRECISION BLOCK WALL/ SIDE YARDS SHEET - 'u 6.SEE TRAIL NOTES STD.NO.1001 � � 6" MOW CURB - 7.GATE SHALL BE PLACED MINIMUM 20'FROM CURB FACE. J „ �i GOLDENLOCKPLACESTREETTREE: ••••••••••••••••••• 6' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE �� 16' EQUESTRIAN TRAIL EASEMENT DRAINAGE CONCRETE NEE" DITCH N CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA LOT, 10-17 EASEMENT APPROVED BY: PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR FERN PINE ,� _ - C, FEEDER TRAIL 20 TO 15 TRANSIT:ION: STANDARD IAN 36 TUBULAR STEEL GATE w/ MESH Lm A NORTH BOUNDARY LINE SI_CTION LOTS 1 9 MOUTH BOUNDARY LINE SECTION W VEHICLE GATE WITH SIDE ACCESS 1006-B - "A"STREET PARKWAY TREE: PRIVACY BACKING AT ALL SIDE YARDS 94 L - NO SCALENO SCALE (HOA MAINTAINED) w C1TY GINEER DATE USE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION 2-RAIL PVC FENCE (SOUTH P.L.) OF w R.C.E. 24953 SHEET 1 OF 1 PISTACIA CHINENSIS CHINESE PISTACHE 24"box cn% I T E ��: 0 NJ ;��- FR U (C 1- 10 N1 / A IV1 E= ICJ 1 T 1 E= ' ICE E=�TA I L_%S T1�' F� I �C:A I� F= F1 01 ICJ �T� 'YA IR; D F� LA Psl T 1 I`J G) �' aC w PLA IN I __ w 2 3 . � o I - _ SPL I't FACE BLOCK WALL 0 (n PI=1U=0F<:ATI=D StE.EL. ME=SI-I ON FAR:iIDE= �� i �`, I u- od 01= PICKETS E WELDING FRAME .� �� f 12" RESTRICTION ✓�A ZO N E � \ a 8 �� �• o ►�e ' � 12" RESTRICTION ZONE * C Z TOP OF 18 SQ. E�.tE1�1D WALL GAP � / u u u WALL. CAP u ' n u � NO MESH AT TOP ✓/ �' \\ � �: CROWNED MORTAR CAi0 Ill ' 16 SQ. 1 � (4�011 / _BOtI'Ol"I OF= � 1 CROUNE:D MORTAR C. Ai CLEAIR /�� = c�ARAC;E 1 AC;E '` / 3 \ �-T J 3 Q Z WALL• CAP � ` ---- �� � iV - u 1 .u n_ SET LATCH AT EitRIKER J i r'/ -- ✓ /' 'I `-- _ Q _�• S x 4 x 16 SF L 11' FACE BLOC;K �,• E3 x 6 x 10 5PL It FACI_ 5LOCK 2 I 1 3co 12 � EDC3E, ALLOW C:LEAR,4NC;E i /�C - _3 '�/- �� J E� COLOR- TAN y� _ - - C.OL.OF<;: TAN J F--OR P,4D•-LOCK, - ' `.�7 .I C �� r� IL —r , — LOC;K ►BLE L.AtCH9 ►J, T7/� 171 r'.. .�T/� � atRIKE;R, LAG E30L_t 1'O - ,� �.�. ,� _=t• EEt:� STUD/BACKIING IN _ -- 3 — l/_�� �/ �. �. ✓� - /� - GARACxE (3 PLACE_s)' /fDRIVATE: M,5LIC 16 x 8 x 16 SPL It FACE BLOCK: _`� ir i F7=11311 r; n n - .� w - _\ -r8 x Ne, STEEL T1,1BE: E ��— � aIDE: SIG E: F21NCz SPLIT, I SIDES, -� _ —v �. v, �,� ,/ ,� 7+ c;OL.OR: TAN WELDING i RAME, AROUND ) _� >� �/� _3 - • 6 x 8 x 16 SPL 17' FACE BLOC:K, --� �� v. ,�. L � '41 v'/,1, w v. ( �� 0 �� S1 LI'T 1 SIDE, -T ( 3) HE�4Y`r'-C>UT'r HINGES f-> �� _ _ _ :?" x 11/z' stE=EL tU1BE stF21K1=R i /' v .� E3 .� .v (. 7t COLOR: TAN -E Sa Q 0 to r o143�8' 0 HILTI KB:3 wJ3" EMBED, 3 v w / v ( . 1 o (;ENITERED W WALL - C `� w v .� /��. \ I < cv ' - . ) �.� / ( ESR 1385) .� � + + � � Nl, w � � .v FINISH 6"RADE: 3"1 5a SQ. STEEL,rue'E ,1, v 41 ,4, v,• IV y ,c, j E_MBEC>, f-ICKET5, 16 GcA. - I "rYP:. -9D 6'u ox% MAX. , .v .v � .v � v- .� .� .v .� �. �� O FINISH GRADE EQUALLY SPACI_D J1 � -- 11/z1 x 1'!il STEEL TUBE: FF2AME �� v v �, \ v, IV v .1 .v IV Iv 4. �� � 71T-fTl. __� - F=1NI;�H GRADEE e� k� or)A�l I-, � —'IV —\11 — uu ,V � v' � �/ t y y- ° Q °o ,c • v a I N Jul \_�/ 1 NY IL Y 1I ° a ul ylIEUJ 1-R0M 1=R0NT `f",45:D y. q/ 4, ��� POURED C:ONCRE TE FOOTING a (GATE SWINGS TOWARD FRONT YARD) _ - — �� — ��,— F 0 — � 7 -� ----- -• POURRED CONC;BETE 1=OC>tING --------------- ��FIL i�r �,a�� : u��a��u :2��L rr =�ac _ c�c>L«MN rr _t,aL. GATE: :� _V��a�ric�� - — 0� ---------- ------------- ----------------------- C� a NO SCALE NO SCALE' NO SC:ALE FF:ONT '''AR:D RETURNS 'A' STREET -- �� � W I f P LA I Z I IRMO o Z MAN - Du IVlor _ 3 - - —3 - I O CIA V) IL Ld Ld '7u N/loh D MODEL: BENCH 57-601 MODEL: RECEPTACLE 124 MODEL: BIKE RACK 130-30 �� o 6' LONG BENCH, IPE WOOD SLATS, 2 SUPPORTS 31 GALLON GALVANPZED STEEL LINER 2" 'SCHEDULE 40 BIKE RACK, 3 PEAKS (7 BIKES) C> * 112 I�ESTRICTION <<' ------ o MFR: Du Mor MFR: Du Mor MFR: Du Mor �--� 12 RESTRICTION ZONE • ZONE _� w www.d u rn o r. N TA cRecreation,1 _ �- \ �o - r� �T K i o com www.clumor.com www.dumor.corr . y CONTACT: Coast Recreation, Inc. CONTACT: Coast Recreation, Inc. CONTACT: Coast Inc. -- — ✓% wwvu.coastrecreation.com www.coastrerreation.com www.coastrecreation.com � info@ coastrecreation.net info@coastrecreation.net info@ coastrecreation.net - _ ;714-619 01C10 7]L4-619-0100 714 619-0100 // ` _ 4 `�� `f ;� •o_,V �� o° a PARK BENCH TRA. H RE.CEPTA,CLE BIKI_ RACK 171 �/ 3 7- B 1 NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE �� )//� l / ��//� T \� --� \\� *%� o i �!/�� 3 �"'� Ld a_ ��.) T T U _ _ �- _ �C -� � o 2 '6 � T T ,r• r T T oe c��� �2%. T .T. ,�. T T �� `r'CN o0 T �, r T T / �- A �� Gr1 a cs' a T ^ T T T T T T T T T � < \ �[ E� c�ON Q T T 11r T /r T• T T T T r 41 /r It, r /r /r /1, a e� o T T T T 1 T r T T T T T T T T T T T T �7 �� i z U N T T T ^r T T T• T \ T r T T T LAJ CONSTRUCTION M,ATERIAL%), METHODS AND AUTOMATIC, F- IRE_ E>PRINKLER �s �� � � �s s ��s .`�� � haw z %>YS r E:NI S AR IE TO I3 E= IN CO M P L IA►NCI_ LD `�WITH CHAPTER ;TA, OF CALIFORNIA ----` —=`= =�=`=— ---- ----- — --- --- '� o BUILDING COIDE=, SECTIC)N F;33T OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, ,, -- °� `� w 0 AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 4!9-1 . 'A' STREET ' TREE LEGEND NOTE_ a Q PLAN f LEG I.N D REFER TO TREE PALETTE ON SHEET L-3 FOR TREE VARIETIES W -------------------------------- BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE_ /SPACING W U CO LS #3 co THIS F'F:C>J E C T IS, LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED - — - — G RO U N DCOVE RS SHRUBS: Z VVI LD L-AN D'-LI RBAN I N1 E,RFA(�E_ FIRE AREA -k*-k A TRACHELOSPERMUM JASMINOIDE' Star Jasmine 1 gal. / 24" o.c. M �� MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM ROOTED CUTTIINGS @ 18" o.c. Z ROSMARINUS 0. PROS. 'Huntington Blue' Huntington's Rosemary 1 gal. / 24" o.c. L (PARKWAYS) N z CUPHEA HY SSOPIFOLIA False Heather 1 gal./ 24" o.c. M 0 o N w B BUXIJS M. JAPONICA 'Greer) Beauty' Japanese Boxwood 5 gal. / 36" o.c. M SODDED TURF w/ R:DWD SHOVEL-CUT EDGE - "MARATHON II", OR APPROVED EQUAL w o ,I, ,c, (MAX. 3:1 SLOPE) F PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA Wheeler s (Dwarf Dwarf Mock Orange 5 gal. / 3(i o.c. M � 11 MYRTUS COMMUNIS 'Compacta' Compact Myrtle 5 gal. / 3(i" o.c. M } PITTOSPORUM CRA'SSIFOLIUM 'Nana' Compact Pittosporum 5 gal. / 3(i" o.c. M TOP (DRESSING a C F;HAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'Spriingtiime' India Hawthorn 5 gal. /42" o.c. M IVY 3" COVER -- ALL SHRUB BEDS & SLOPES -TYPC:IAL: FOREST FLOOR SHREDDED BARK MULCH Z 0-2" UNDER SHRUBS. 0 RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA 'Springtiime' India Hawthorn 5 gal. /42" o.c. M 5YI150L 1 2 1 / LA\ER UNDER GROUNDCOVERS. O o CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'Little John' Little John Bottle Brush 5 gal. /42" o.c. M SOURCE: AGUINAGA FERTILIZER COMPANY Z 0 ILEX VOI'✓IITORIA 'Nana' Dwarf Yaupon Holly 5 gal. /42" o.c. L IRVIINE, CA (949) 786-9558 ^ 0 N D PRUNUS CAROLINIA.NA 'Corn acta' Compact Carolina Laurel 5 al. 42" o.c. M �� 61 V) p p g / *�k17/// - � � UGUSTRUM TEXANIJM Waxleaf Privet 5 gal. /42" o.c. M � IV1INIMUM .� NO SHRUB PL.AN1fING ZONE il� N cr(A L.AURUS NOBIL1S Bay Laurel 5 gal. /42" o.c. L `-z .� N Z ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS "Tuscan Blue' Tuscan Blue Rosemary 5 gal. /42" o.c. L J 11� Z J; J w Q I— m Q: lit a ------------ U L p �: :L 0 E PHOTINIA FRASERI Fraser's Photinia 5 gal. / 60" o.c. M N c Ci cJ o XYLOSMA CONGESTUM 'Compacta' CompactXylosma 5 gal. / 60" o.c. M HIGH FIRE ZONE / CITY PLANTING RESTRICTION NOTES: Q d VIBURNUM TINIJS 'Compactum' Spring Bouquet Laurustinus 5 gal. / 60" o.c. M * 1.. NO PLANT FOLIAGE (at maturity) OR ORGANIC: MULCH TOPDRESSING SHALL 13E CLOSER THAN 12" W ESCALLONIA FRADESII Pink Escallonia 5 gal. / 60" o.c. M TO THE E3UILDING. a ** 2. NO SHRUBS OR VINE FOLIAGE (at maturity' SHALL BE CLOSER THAN 5' TO ANY BUILDING WINDOW. VINES: ** 3. MAXIMUM SHRUB GROUPING IS THREE (3), AND A MINIMUM 5' SPAACE= MUST BE MAINTAINED khogg Q PHAEDRANTHUS BUCCINATORIA Blood-Red Trumpet 5 gal. staked M BETWEEN GROUPINGS. �ot BIGNIONIA VIOLACEA Lavender Trumpet 5 gal. staked M 4. MAXIMUM TREE GROUPING IS THREE (3) AND A MINIMUM 20' SPACE MUST BE MAINTAINED SHEIET Alm PANDOREAJASMINOIDIES 'Rosea' Pink Bower Vine 5 gal. staked M BETWEEN GROUPINGS. PANDOREAJASMINOIDIES 'Alba' White Bovver'Vine 5 gal. staked M LOW SHRUB/GROUND COVERS 4" OR LESS IN HEIGHT MAY BE ALLOWED TO GROW TOGETHER WITH NO GROUPINGS OR SPECIAL SPAC:ING REQUIRED. LE 4 6. THE PLANT PALETTE MUST EXCLUDE ALL CITY PROHIBITED FIRE ZONE PLANT MATERIALS. lF 4 0 a '1• ■■■� ■ ■■ ■■ ■■■■ rAOEM ■■ ■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ OEM 00 1 . Y r luliillrIaT�laTi!!.�� B, F ■■ p i NONE �■ ■ ■■ ■■ i - II11 �■ 111II _- _ .■■. .. _ o ■. .. .._ .. ... JFF NONE NONE AL A PLAN 2C - FARMHOUSE PLAN 1 B - CALIFORNIA RANCH PLAN 2A - SPANISH PROJECT TEAM AREA TABULATIONS ARCHITECTURAL SHEET INDEX MANNING HOMES - Craig Kozma Plan 1 A 3511 SF House Plan 1 C 3511 SF House 20151 SW Birch St. Ste. 150 672 SF Garage 672 SF Garage 108 SF Portico 108 SF Portico A1 .0 Plan 1 - Front Elevations A2.0 Plan 2 - Front Elevations Newport Beach, CA 92660 268 SF Covered Porch 268 SF Covered Porch 949.250.4200 4559 SF Footprint 4559 SF Footprint A1 . 1 Plan 1 A - Spanish Floor Plan A2.0. 1 Plan 2 - Front Elevations Plan 1B 3511 SF House A1 .2 Plan 1 - Floor Plan Options A2. 1 Plan 2A - Spanish Floor Plan 672 SF Garage WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. - Don White 108 SF Portico A1 .3 Plan 1 A - Spanish Front Elevation & Roof Plan A2.2 Plan 2 - Floor Plan Options 268 SF Covered Porch 2850 Redhill Ave. , Suite 200 4559 SF Footprint A1 .4 Plan 1A - Spanish Building Elevations A2.3 Plan 2A - Spanish Front Elevation & Roof Plan Santa Ana, CA 92705 A1 .5 Plan 1 B - California Ranch Floor Plan A2.4 Plan 2A - Spanish Building Elevations 949.250.0607 Plan 2A 2243 SF Lower Level Plan 2C 2243 SF Lower Level A1 .6 Plan 1 B - California Ranch Front Elevation & Roof Plan A2.5 Plan 2B - California Ranch Floor Plan 806 SF Madole & Associates, Inc. - Mark Bertone 852 SF Garage Porchtorage 152 SF Garage Porch A1 .7 Plan 1 B - California Ranch BuildingElevations A2.6 Plan 2B - California Ranch Front Elevation & Roof Plan 247 SF ear Porch 9302 Pittsburgh Avenue, Suite 230 3448 SF Rear Porch 3448 SF 247 SF Footprint g A1 .8 Plan 1C - Farmhouse Floor Plan A2.7 Plan 2B - California Ranch Building Elevations Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Plan 213 2243 SF Lower Level A1 .9 Plan 1 C - Farmhouse Front Elevation & Roof Plan A2.8 Plan 2C - Farmhouse Floor Plan 909.481 .6322 806 SF Garage 152 SF Front Porch A1 . 10 Plan 1 C - Farmhouse Building Elevations A2.9 Plan 2C - Farmhouse Front Elevation & Roof Plan 247 SF Rear Porch FRANK RADMACHER ASSOCIATES, INC. - Frank Radmacher 3448 SF Footprint A2. 10 Plan 2C - Farmhouse Building Elevations 14841 Yorba St. , Suite 204 Tustin, CA 92780 714.832. 1774 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES ETIWAN DA ' ,At Ill Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials NTs And Application May Vary. RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA CCU 2020 VUILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba VUHA. 2020020 102-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LQ5 ANGELES . BAY AREA .r r, ti M y •� i-r.T, �� "I. '^ pk •- `�d �p - , rGil .., 71 rFk loll I I 4,6 - •�� - 4 1 r ru !► +may '� 'f!i yr. '1� �..� 1JL v _ l! ._EM IN wll � —II _ !� 1 �I,l�� .� +�'r � � •;,�:;�- a , ' .. AM Mimi M11M Rim .. r ..�.�" r I.�■��1- �.r��. +.w �.r,�- � �.- ! ' .., •,ti., .: _w.a���rs.w_w_w_w_w�As.._.-.- --: - r •` f �i ;. •� - - - - -• -sx _- � JI � �� .w �...e7 _�wwwwwwwwwwwwwWA� �wwwwwwiwwawwwwwwww+� i�,l�l■I■I�+ -. _:. _.'_ __ ��{ q � n' '��.rwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwL_ Ail- 7wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww � �- -. .�.�wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.- r.�:wwwwwwwwwwwwwwww•w.wr.,._� ��wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww w a�wew.���w.�ww�w� 5 . . . ■ •' �wwwwww� ` .wwwwwwwww iw ti ■ i �wwwwwwwwww + �t C • �«r� .:.:w�� .w�lwwww :ice .�� �w.w. �w� ��1111111�1111�11�111111111�11�11�1111111�1111111�1111111�11�1�11� ,■ �� LL IN 111iiii 11iiiii y - _ .wwwwwwww .wwwwwwwwww -w.� •mow. ,.,,. - rr • - - _ � © � _ , Lw.w.w. Lw.w.w.w.w �� �w.w.w. a mow. �I �I �I I� + i - �wwwwww �wwwwwwwww .7www� �ww �wwww� ,■ •1.�•��ir'. '!. � - r ����� �wiwwiwwiwwiww s�� ww �� n ,.I' - .wwwwwwww .wwwwwwwwww nwwwo � www �wwwwwww �� w•� + w� � � � .�wwwwwwww .wwwwwwwwww ���� •� �w�wo -� - _ 11 -� � 1 �wwwwwwww �wwwwwwwww ;w.ww� �wwwwww � �wwww� — . ����� `� wwiwwiww � — w_wwwwww .wwwwwwwwww awa ■�ww a� � f i wwwww. wwwwwwww �I_ �.��. �w.w• fl E1E1E�1 E1E1E1EI �wwwwwwww _ �wwwwwwwwww -� r �•�� �a. ■E!!E!!!iiism-?w�iw�� ��������������wAwrl�.w�w. w._ �.swwww�w�wlrwiR � '� - • . .Y - - � - -- wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwa r ri r•:-. � -- � .- a �. � � � � -w+wwww•�.wr.�wwlw•rw.�.ww-�'�wwe ay r. r Ell } • r.. Y IIIII II"11 �11111 IIIII� _� ',` r e �r �r�� — �- wl v VA ■ 1 y . . , 1 � 1 A IN 1 � 1 • 1 1 11 . . ■ � � � � � � � 1 ► 1 11 1 1 1 � i I I I I I 701_011 I I 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH I I o o CID LO � � � I N � N I I I I I Covered Porch EDining Room Ma4, ledroom 221_411 x 121_011 '-11 " x 1 '-1 " 1_511 161.111 I I � � I I I C.0 c LO I c� I j C=n ' I I I II I � I I I x x I o , Cn ° LO CNJ II I o Flex Space coLO I I Linen II , ' I1 �'x'� i 111.111 x 141.111 M Bath IL----- I I Grea R00 1 0 ° ° co Kitchen o 201.611 201.111 l O ° ° M Volum Ceilin ' ---- J ' I I I II I I I Pwdr Linen o = c o I ---_—= II II _ - - - --- ------- M tj I - /A `. WIC Entry i' 111.111 x 16'-8 ' � 34 LF y I ' Co is �� co an DZ 'L------_ ------J' I I - ----- - - -------- I I J Linen Ug N _n�Laundry 131.411x 131_011 I 0 =1 ' 1 x 91-011 N \\\ Entry Courtyard \. \, y y --- \� -----w 131.011 x 141.811 --- C o o --- o ao i 0 0 I _ D C=) Bath 3 Hall a h 2 Car G rage [�D NCD 21 '-1 ' x 21 '-511 0 I a --- I I co I LO M Cn Portico o ' LO --_-_- 131_011 x 81_411 N I N I Be room 2 Be d ro m 3 11 '-3" x 13'- 1&-0"x 8'-0"SECT.GAR.DOOR I -------------------- 1 1_311 x 121.911 I = Ic C/Ddrm 4/ Teen m co r-O --- M111.111 1_ 11 LO 2656 SH 2656 SH I I 3056 SH \ I I 3656 SH I I PLAN 1A SPANISH I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 3 ) 511 SF ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS ETIWANDA CAl 1 ' lics Ill ■ M NNINGHOMES 0 2 4 8 16 Au RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" VJHI © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. I 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 34 LF -------- ——-- I - - - —_—— - - I I I I I , I a ---- ----- — Linen -lc=) 00 I 00 � CA) 6edroom 4CD N Laundry 11 '-0" x 131_211 =13 1 x 91_0 11 LL ------ I II / \ II ------- v =====J 2680 I C) Bath 3 Hall a h z\ o Bath 3 Hall a h\ CD C\j C/3 C/3 II - N I - o o O O \, \ C.0 LO \ LO _ - \ C) M = - \ CM -----T C/3 L0 -- I Lf7 N j �� �\ j N Bec room 2 0 Be room 2 0 11 '-3" x 131- 11 '-3" x 131- Bedroom 3 Bedroom 3 ill-311 x 12'-911 1 'CIO -3" x 12'-911 Te n Room I N Bdrm. Ste. 11 '-1 ' x 13' " co co -KN /U11) / 1 �_1 � 11.4�� N � / I N N ---- ---- C.0 / ---- ---- 2656 SH 2656 SH ' cou H /-000 On 2656 on 3056 SH 3056 SH 3656 SH 3656 SH OPT. BEDROOM 2 SUITE OPT. TEEN ROOM / BEDROOM 4 PLAN 1 = OPTIONS 3 ) 511 SF ft Al 02 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS I M NNINGHOMES ETIWANDA C lics I I 1 0 2 4 8 16 Au '- " RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Scale: 1/4"= 1 0 © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA r----------- -----------I I I I I I I I I I I I I T T I I I �I;i 4i I I I ----------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I 4:12 I I I T I I I I � I 4:12 I � I I I ® I I 4:12 I I I i I 4:12 I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I L- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ------------ I I I I I j I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4:12 4:12 I I I I 4:12 I I I I I T T I I L I ----------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � - r oof - _ _ Rakes ■ ■■ ■■aves [ME, _ _ F. T Scheme# 1 Front ❑3 5❑ 7 4 2 6 10 9 1 11 SPANISH - A 1❑ Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof ❑2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia with 46 Rafter Tails ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board 05 Gable Accent: Round Pre-Manufactured False Vent Pipes © Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish 7❑ Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters ® Trim Accent: Hardi Simulated Wood 9❑ Tile Accent: Decorative Ceramic Tile at Front Entry 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 1A I SPANISH Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA LA III Al 3 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS ■ M NNINGHOMES � 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA i FF �i I { i it 'I' I '{+ I� •� - ' I 1' 1 i I ` l .Gt � � ' li Ili I � - - - i � I ! ..� k .�. i _ •�.I � �! I ] - � - f` - k 71- �!1 P I• -^ �r" �C" Ii I II h I 1• ~ :j � � •F �- ' ■ ■■ ■ NEI , ■■ ■ ■■ Scheme# 1 Left 4 5 3 6 2 7 i' r% f r � �;�T�� j� - - �� ' . f - - - I } i ,♦ I I + I r I; 1 ���' -- ---- ---- - ----- - - - ---- -- -- - - -- - - - t�r, it i■� - - -- I �� - -_•��----��yy^^yyr i - _ _ ,r t � .i� ■�� - - + I I ^V� + 1 I I l I• r { ^ 1� iF + i !I I r 11 f• F i I� ^ r 1 I I •r r. l f ^ l + �' ■■ ME, ME ■ M. ■■ ■■ ■ ■■ - ■ LJJr.. INE111 Right 3 1 ❑2 6 6 7 SPANISH - A 1❑ Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof - ❑2Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia with 46 Rafter Tails .I -7P 1 3 Exterior. Stucco 16/20 sand finish - _ �� r� .t_ zr,� 4 Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board _ ■ ` r - ��I I i 11�_ P,�- � : ■ Ye�,�� ...1 - I I - 7 .i I., 1 1 -J "If � 1 05 _ r�;•/�{ --Y,f Gable Accent: Round Pre-Manufactured False Vent Pipes _ 6 20/30 sand finish❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes a 7❑ Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters +' -_ - _�--__---- -----_�---. � _ ---__--- - - ------_--- -__- ------ ------- -- -__ ® Trim Accent: Hardi Simulated Wood T MENEM ■■ ■■ a r 9 Tile Accent: Decorative Ceramic Tile at Front Entry ENEMA ■■ ■■ 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door F.G. "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Rear and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 2 631 4 8 1 5 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 1A I SPANISH Building Elevations ETIWANDA I Avck 01 Ill Al 04 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES 6 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA i I I I I I 701_011 I I 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH L I I --—————— � <= o o � " ————————— `O (.0 / co I N � N I I I I I Covered Porch EDining Room 31-1111 x 1 1-111 M edroom 22'-4" x 12'-0" 1_511 161.111 I C.0 LO I cli I j C=n ' o x x I Cn ° LO II I I o I I 1I1\ Flex Space x co Linen I �' '� i i M Bath 11 1.111x 141.1 11 I 'I I I Great R00 0 ° ° 1 c Kitchen I 201-611 20'-111 l O ° ° I 1 co Volume Ceilin ' I I III � L---- I I II I C Pwd r ' [:D Linen I o = I I C/3 J1 o I _ - - - ___________________________ --- i�-- —mil Ir—�I � � \\\/I —� M i �xrv/ WIC Tandem -' I �I II.' - ----- I I ---------------------------- I I 1.111 xEntry 16'-8 ' � 34 LF Co 'I IL an I D Zco C= M I I - ----- - - -------- I ; I J Cl) Cn Linen I Den/Dining o CnI N Laundry - 131-411 x 131-011 0 =1 1 I x 91_011 N 7 ill 1, Entry Courtyard --- -----w 1 31_p11 x 141-811 --- C C ) I 0 Cn CD - Bath 3 Hall a h C) 2 Car GC rage N 211-1 ' x 21 '-511 ----- 0 I LI I o --- I C= CIO M Portico 0 LO _--_--_-_- 131_011 x 81_411 N I N I Bec room 2 0 — -- o -- ---- I11 '-3" &0"x 13'- ——————— - x '80"- SECT.GAR.DOOR j� Bedroom 3 ---------------------- ;111.311 x 124, Cn drm 4/ Teen m 1 111.111 1- 11 I N � I 3056 SH 3056 SH I I 3056 SH 3056 SH I I PLAN 1 B CALIFORNIA RANCH I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 3 ) 511 SF ETIWANDA L - sics Ill Al 5 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS ■ 0 2 4 8 16 M NNINGHOMES Scale: 1/4'1= 1 '-0" Au RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA VJHI © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA r------------------- r---------- ------------ ---------------------------------- N-7 r r ' I TI I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4:12 I I I I I I I I 4:12 I I ; 0 4:12 I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I , I i I I I , I , I I I I I , I i I I I , I , I I I I I , I --------- I I i j j ; 4i , I I I I I I i j I I i j j I , I I I , I I I , I I I , I I I I ----------- I [ I I I I [ � I I 4:12 I , I I I , I 4:12 -------------- I , I I I I , I i I I I ' I J L-------- -------- -.h `f omill FBI . ` 1 1 C [ Roof Plan _ -_ J■._-_ P 1 . Rakes --_- - - c� Eaves _U J J. IT L I L J L111 11111111 LIP Scheme# 4 1 1 Front ❑3 5 8 4 © 9 10 2 1 11 CALIFORNIA RANCH - B 1❑ Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof ❑2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia With 46 Rafter Tails ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board 05 Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Brick Veneer © Gable Accent: Board and Batt Siding & Exposed Wood Corbels 7❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish ® Window Accent: Brick Accents at Brick Veneer Locations 9❑ Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 1 B I CALIFORNIA RANCH Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA I A III Al 06 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES 0 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA ir i i .•-fir•'' I �I I _� I _� � I` + ` ,�fr,► rrrr .-. - ' :ram - t' - I .► r _ - J ■■ ■1 ■■ ■ moo ■■ ■ II Scheme# 4 Left 6 4 3 7 2 1 5 y' -i i _r I ! •I I •I I II i I _ 4 � . , r I _ NO _ I I-I I... Right 3 1 2 7 7 9 5 8 CALIFORNIA RANCH - B 1❑ Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof ❑2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia With 46 Rafter TailsCO I :+ ! l I !.r,, .•, I I I + r 4 n rr ,,S I —J� ;+ } i 3 ' li 3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish _ r'' _ .r x _ 4 Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board I I I -II . _}. - I I I , t I s..-, _ , Ir - •r , - t g g - 5 Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Brick Veneer '` `❑ LL v f .r7► i,;:r tr 97r: 'f'Y i ,i•--3T5• tir`i " ' 'Y1 "` 1P © Gable Accent: Board and Batt Siding & Exposed Wood Corbels 7❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finishco ® Window Accent: Brick Accents at Brick Veneer Locations r moo ■■ ■ ■ r 9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters ■ ■ v v 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Rear and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California31 1 2 8 5 4 6 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 1 B I CALIFORNIA RANCH Building Elevations ETIWANDA Ave 1 Ill Al 07 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS i 0 2 4 8 16 M NNINGHOMES Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-0" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 0 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 70'-0" 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH N Covered Porch ETiT Dining Roo M edroom 22'-4" x 12'-011 �-4 �-4 I '-511 x 16'_1 " I I I I X) LO o ------------------ co IICIO --- I x x ——— M 0 `=r' I I I I I LO C.0 CID I V olum I Flex Space LO N Linen X 11 '-1 " x 14' M Bath I I -----OGreaRo oo 1 'I 1.0 Kitchen II M 201-6�� 2 �-1 o oCeil' I I I II I I N Pwd r Linen C:) CQ CIO II II --- -------------- -- M ——————————— --� I� — -- � ---------------- --- '�---�' F/ J`i I---- I_ _ .I WIC Tandem ' c0 II 34 LF 'I Entry 1 '-1 " x 16'-8 ' I I I I I ---- - - ------------ Co is antr y DZ IL — — — ----JI CIO coT. ------- ------- I Linen Den/Dining o = Laundry N I 13'-4" x 13'-0" 0 =1 x 91-0" N Entry and Y Courtyard II , ,' 13'-0" x 14'-8" I ---- o =3: C\J .- 0 I c= C/D E:D= Bath 3 Hall a h\ � 2 C r G rage o I I � N 21 '-1 ' x 21 '-5" o � VD \\ � U3 IFL- CY) Portico CD U:) Pi LO CDco -- _ _ 131.0�� x 81_4�� N ------- N Bedroom 2 0 - - 11 '-3" x 131- ———————— 16-0"x 8'-0"SECT.GAR.DOOR F Bedroom 3 1 '-3" x 12'-911 BCD = 13drm Al Teen m LO cl� I N co N 2656 SH 2656 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH PLAN 1 C FARMHOUSE 3 ) 511 SF ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS ETIWANDA L1Al Isics Ill 08 M NNINGHOMES 0 2 4 8 16 Au RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" VJHI © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. I 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA -------------- ----------------- r---------- -------------------------------------------- 777 I I V CM I I I �i I 00 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II F ----- I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I 6:12 i I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 6:12 0 '_ 6:12 I I I I I I I I I I I 6:12 I 777 I I I I I I I I I I I I I ` I I . I I . I I � I I � I I � I I � I I � I 1 ------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n1 nl I 166 1 I I I I I T ri I I I I I I I I I N T I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I12 I I j I I B:12 I I I I I I I I I I I B:12 I I I I I I I I I _ _ - - ' -------------J -__--------- T - - r I - - - , - 't - -9 +-r - I „ -- I- =1-.-.- T-r--7 I__ J I I . Roof Plan I C _I[ l•_ Rakes - - ...... ... r = .. .......... Eaves 12 - - I I I Scheme# 7 Front 9 3 3 8 7 ® © 8 5 10 2 1❑ ® 11 6 FARMHOUSE - C 1❑ Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Roof ❑2 Fascia: 2x6 Wood Fascia ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish / Vertical Board and Batts ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board ❑5 Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Stone Veneer © Gable Accent: Horizontal Siding / Vertical Board and Batts 7❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish ® Window Accent: Stucco Over Foam Trim 20/30 sand finish at Stone Veneer Locations ❑9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door 12 Copper Roof: Standing Seam "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 1 C I FARMHOUSE Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA A Ill Al 09 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES 0 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA w Fr Scheme# 7 Left 6 6 3 7 2 1 1`` Ilk L7, - - - _ - - - , r F - ;I __ Right 3 1 ❑2 7 7 9 6 5❑ 8 FARMHOUSE - C 1❑ Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Roof a 2 Fascia: 2x6 Wood Fascia — T --- - -- ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish / Vertical Board and Batts - - - - - _ I Ijy -- - 4❑ Barge: Wood 2x6 Bare Board g g w � _ ,® r; ❑5 Veneer. Manufactured Mortared Stone Veneer 6 Gable Accent: Horizontal Siding Vertical Board and Batts _ - - r , - 7❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish , _ - -- -- +1JL - o 8 Window Accent: Stucco Over Foam Trim 20/30 sand finish at Stone Veneer Locations - 9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters - r - 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door . .. cc 12 Copper Roof: Standing Seam "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Rear and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 1 2 7 5 4 6 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1" PLAN 1 C I FARMHOUSE Building Elevations Al 010 Nil ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS DESIGNERS ET1Wt' NDA A ( Ill 0 2 4 8 16 M NNIN HOMES Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHOCUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � CCU 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA Tr i ' 10 ., F i �J - 4*011 y r � _ •� I AllII AF NP l jT • 4 I�i1�RliiiZfiliifitl�i�1'�i�l�fTfi��■■i�i�il■illiil����i�i�ll�l� Ii*iil�rl�l�li��i��f*fl■�i~��rs�u_,�.�itYiilf3eYir�lill!aiE�il�i�S��l iii�ili��I�i�i��i�lll�fliifillii�li�R 1 _ -- - - ,�.-- ■�I��I ■rll�t�l��■I��r■�I fl■��■■�I��I �11�14 T■■�■���1��_ �ih■I�I�����■�I�i ■i`ri�i�■■■il�i .'�,�'" . , � �-. , _ ii�iwirii■�wi{iil�i��ii�iii��ii�i�l�iiiii�lri_ i�"i�■i�i _ _i`■li■ _iii■_ �ii�_ ii3i_■i■i��lii_■�i_ii■■■i1i ■i�i_ ii�ii�"■ ii�iii � ` '�.. . �_� _ �� �� '1 � 1 ®• � ..R���� �■ _ ����•�■_� �1■ � Mom ` i-r,� � _ r r- ►- A.' �.•. - ref 'rJ r ti --r .f' r- Ilia LLJI —LILL] ■��(�l■_■�_ ■�u�■�i ��■■�1�■�iu��■u�l�■I��i�■■Af�_ ®�_■�■�■��■I■ulAl■ �!■��_ f�l�■�■I■�il�l■�il�l■_ �_ Dill■_ I_■�i■rl • +� � -� '�� -: � _ _ ,� - ������1 f���l�� 1��_�!�� •'�� -'min �� �ei��■r _ � -� _�----�i�_r�I��. ,� .r .r v-•- �y-- r .. �; ';�1�i��■���' � - �� - . � ` � � ��_�1111111111111111� �" - � � - www [-_T� �.w �r �•"'�* - � �■ I ■'$�� �: www■. ■mow •";: ww x ,.. �■+�■ 'ice..—, —11 4 >*" .L —� .--- h ------------ meows t r .•� ��. �■ice �• -_� fir! � � _� •,y i, ►r � � _fi�liiiiiiiiiiii�—aw � ,'. �ilw��_l�■,��■�ll�i�■�■lii ������1 F��■�����o�: --� �®�S •� � f 4� � �� R AIM In m 11 loin mm—mll--M—mm 1i■� iii E■i��i�Nwi�ili�l�l�MISI■Mi ■■�ili�i - .Y �d�—!� _ �■■'1� �-�11 � ~ • aa�awwa� wa�a�wwswiwa� t. !f° r .rii' r�sr■ .�i r~r r�rru wr3.aori:sr+wr� a,wraas � .a> — Q�x •+� m ------ ----------■ - MfiFm iw�ri■i� �ili�ii:■ i�ii■��■�� �I■ar it ii■■i l■f� �=��' _ _ _ _ A / —www wwwwww—www■ r „'f ii 7. I■!■��f■I I � •------ �■ - ie® - - - [1r�1■IM1■i ll■■I��IWiII■i 5■,�����i�i�=►i�i� lid■ • r -•---...��-�.-�_�.�-,--..� _._•�-+-..-�., -..vim- e.��.w�. ""�-��.�'�7--- t- - --- �J' ---- - - - -- - - -` Y'.Ik. �- - - �----- -----------■ r - •� .. :� � '���� i=� - J - ���w www w w  - - --- _— - - -- -- --_ - I wwwww www ww w� _ _ 1p l!son!!!■!OEM!!!■!!!i!!I!!■!!!!!noon Non Ron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Ow r —� ■■■�---- ��: ., �, � .� � � Illllillllllllllllllllllllllll F,�r y ��=-�"'�°�� is 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 •� s r ■ �_ . 11■1 . I I ■ �- !... _ —r LL JJ I I I I I 111111111 11�, _ ��� OEM 111111111 - - •�� --� .��— i - I Illllill �� :— � �— --■ �iii�iiiliiiiiiiliiiiililiiiii■ }�J Ell IN ! Ell Ar ■ . 1 � 1 1 . 1 ll i 1 .- . . . . • r - f - � _ � � •r_ � ae ; �Y � Fri r• r nis Xm LLH �y "s-nw`s4:wi3'►�w"r .�i.�b'S��ii�:'• i+ � � i50, AF l r' .i* 4 ��ill�Il�If��_! ��-�■$e 1•l�lflf 1.1l�IIIIgAII��'I�I�i���_I��1■1■��IIA�!!■IIg1�A1■ 111111!#�I���I'_���i>�47ti�■1�.�>_�1� IgIA� lllilr����_f�L ti/�' -- - - Mal I- l— �% ��I ��I � �■�ii�l ■ i,!NOW M—ill M R � _ _ _ _�ii __ _ f�l�i�_ 1�_ _�_�_ � -®i�_ lir i_iil�_�. lir�i_■�ii�_�_�iwifl■i�_lil�_ ii■�ii�ii���_ ■_■Iii�__ -__■`�i � ' �r*� •� - � r � � - -^�. -- -- - - - - -�- _ - - -- � - ! � r �,,.�, r ■ r �� -lam �'r� r �� n r ■ � fdw� Wm I•I _ MOM �ffi-- :.. �iii■�-i�ilri �' �mli■�Il�' 0 ��� w�T urr�i �� ; �,} _ _ - '-`j- ' ���llflllflfllflllf _ I Ll 9 '� � - i�ilif_��iw_ ■���wdl■�i�iii�■ii�_ii�i,■�_ii�_il�i�_ iiii■ifi�lf�i�ilu��l��i�wl■�i_�®� ®Io�� - � f.�� _ —=z=---- -------_ - � � �II�I•I■M_���■����I�I�1�1� !�■iilrl��ll���lli�l�'1��1�11 0 �—�0�.4 �� N';• � �- � �- r' r jr r —�a�a���a���_wa�aw�—�i:..�i - ,� # .a � Y — — - �wrww. .e�■r_�a_�..��.�a..� r.�.wca� C rr.a 0 �0� - - - IIIIl�II�IA�I III�I�IAIAI�1�■f��R'��II�I� 1 ' 11•�I i����■■ [����It!■ Ali �■iw ti�■��I I�d�-_� s 0 1[f l Mob �___ ___ T I��3R_ v err ~� 1 +�� �.�/.iL� 7♦. i����s��_� " 1prl �� � ��L-��� `•`!, _ va�lA�li!!l!!!!i!!!!i!!!!!!!!!!�!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!i!!!!i!!f!!1!!!!i!A �s� ��_��■■■r____Z� '- E-1 �` i - I I f IF -1111 1 1 .1 . L ��� ��■ — �' !' � �! '��°�� Ifflllflllf111111111111111111f1111111111111111111111111111111f1111 - LLI ■nr■■■worn ' IIIIIIIIIAIIII � ■ s _ _ -- _ 11111i111i1111 �a ®© IIIIIIIII r s � � ■ _ r. �r�r�_________r�nr+�_ rarnrnr y- r - , , ■ , i� ■■ 1 ■■11■ ■■■■1■ ■■■ � r - - � '� � , , ■ — — ::ter_=c -_� •_ + � R� `' 11 ii A fii" ■ i 1 ■ ! 1 ■ .- . . . . 70'-0" 40 7 9,--oO I 13'-6" 40 20'-6" 400 16'-6" 19'-6" 40, 13'-6" 40 20'-6" 14'-0" � 2'-6" 401t 19'-6" jolt 3060 SH 3060 SH Cn I I o I o � TEMP. GL. TEMP. GL. E 2650 SH 2650 SH I� CD �I � ——— — ——— ---- --- Covered Porch w Dining ARCHED ARCHED ARCHED 3050 SH 3050 SH x 6080 TEMP. GL. SLIDER 20'-1 " X 12'-0" o ' " ' " 2650 FX 2650 FX 2650 FX ® Cn00 El x o i N z o cn N 3050 SH 5050 SH 3050 SH N 3050 SH 5050 FX 3050 SH o 16080 TEMP. GL. CENTER SLIDER al `I - ———— ———————— ————— Bedr om 2 U CD HMC/DZ EA - M Bath N Den CD 131_111 121_211 13' 1 �� X 3�_0�� I co 1:31L° ----- andem Garage I;`�,. 1 12'_9" x 20'- " N N , I I I; ;x,, 1 6068 BI-PASS - _ Bonus Roo 11 Mast room 18'-1 " x 16'-11 ' �i i' 17'- " x 6'-3" M �I of Great 00 O ° ° 0 �i i ��. 71Ll8'-6" X 19' 7" IKitchenN �� 1 Storage '1 WIC 1' = I 1-- 8'-10" x 9'_7" Bath 2 I 17'_7" x 9'_8" o ; 1 0 No 268o I I C) N J= --------� co CD Linen LU CD 00 o LU o N Linen I ML �" K) KI � o WIC Hall00 �; Li en I co Shelves a----- 1 OC L= r--k N Linen Bath 4 I I I o °] 26so Linen St 26so Butler's Pantry LL- 0 1 " Pan o DN torage co CIO N I Linen N o 0 Bath - - 2CrGrage ----------- �'�� \;;�;� �'�, i I ----- ----- 6o6s BI-PASS 2680 26so ----- --- 21 -7 x 20 -1 11 N Laundr I ech Loft ----- ----- edroom 4 6080B1-PASS �� _____ _____ 880PR. G. y 0 en To Below o 13 -0 x 11 3 LO �, N! `�' V FR. DOOR 11 -1 x 10 -3 I ----- ----- p - 8 ° ----- ----- N I N Linen -- ----- Pwd r ----- ----- E ntry J ----- ----- TED I 8 CI \ UP --- — -- — --- ----- ———————————— -------- --- 2040 SH 2O40 SH 20 DIN. FX Bedroom 3 2040 SH 3050 SH 2O40 SH Bedroom 5 00 n i n g/D ROUND 13'-1 " x 13'-8" 13'-1 " x 13'-11 " ; � x 1 ' 11 iciclil 2046 FX 2046 FX 2046 FX 2030 SH 2O30 FX 1 o a ARCHED ARCHED ARCHED = TEMP. GL. — \ Cn co Cn 0 0 LO co UO LO co LO N N " Front Porch N 1-4 3650 SH 3056 SH 3056 SH 20'-1 " X 7'-6" Cl? SH 2656 SH 1'-4" 5'-2n" 1�_4�� 5'-22" 1�_4�� 5'-22" 11-1 11 -4 A or 13'-6" 20'-6" 14'-0" 22'-0" 13'-6" J. 20'-6" 14'-0" 22'-0" 70'-0" 70'-0" or PLAN 2A SPANISH 4 ) 767 SF A201 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES ETIWANDA ' A '�"' 111 1 0 2 4 8 16 RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CA Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" i © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 I 02-04-2 1 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 6080 TEMP. GL. SLIDER Cm 0 Co Suite 3drm \A) 13'-1 " x 13'-0" 6080 BI-PASS TL- / 1 -_- - - - o 00 >< - --- I I I I C-D7 CL:C/3 Linen CD 00 o , wC\d Co O N I — I Bath 4 4 ° L268 Linen I 7 , UC Ref Sink DW o w/micro abv kitchette00 , 2680 PR.�T.G. �I FR. D06� 4 Pwd r --- --- --- ------ ------ suite Living C Den 13-1 " x 13-11 " 13' 3'-8" 72030N Co 2880 3056 SH 3056 SH 2656 SH 2656 SH Optm Living Suite Optmional Den PLAN 2 OPTIONS ETIWANDA CLASSICS III A22 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS ■ 0 2 4 8 16 MANNINCWHOMES 1Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" 1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. I 2020020 102-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA ------------------------------------------------------- I 3:12 ® I 3:12 r------------- --------- ---------- -i-� ' I I _J_L 4:12 I I I I I I I I I I -I I I r r I r r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I rJ L j I I I I I � I 4:12 I I I I I I I 4:12 4:12 I I L1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4:12 I � I I I I L ----------------------------- ---------------------------------- , I I I I I I I I I I I NV L I - 4:12 -------� N -- ----------- ---_--_ I T r I I 4i -;i I I I I 4:12 L - L J I I I L--------------------------------J ,�• $�+t' 1�I~��'k:'^r"}F�Y� �.•�--,��;r�-.r. ti-i. `�.�-�l - --a IT fr1k Roof Plan h - ��' � ' t�� Y�-x� Ili i `+r�1����t�r -r V � - t � •1 •r *r � �'- � � � 'z-, NEI Rakes ■■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ME ■� ■■ II ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ 40K( ■■ Eaves 24 �s� ' - } ,�-.�r ter,; - , _ -�� •, r- r i r .I I Irk•I �' i. � - . 'T I----------- �'• 8 Scheme# 2 1 1 1 Front 3 1❑ © ❑2 9❑ 8 5 7 ® 10 SPANISH - A 1❑ Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof ❑2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia with 46 Rafter Tails ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board 5❑ Gable Accent: Round Pre-Manufactured False Vent Pipes © Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish 7❑ Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters ® Tile Accent: Decorative Ceramic Tile 90 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 10 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 2A I SPANISH Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA I A III A203 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS 2 4 8 16 M NNINGHOMES Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA r f"' - r SPANISH A T.D.P. .� I . ; r~ I Yr I T.O.P. c I ,. "" 1 Roof: Concrete S Tile Roof � ■■ � ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■❑ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ON ARE ■ ■■ ■■ 02 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia with 46 Rafter Tails ■■ moll ■■ ■ ■■ ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish - ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board F.F. F.F. 5❑ Gable Accent: Round Pre-Manufactured False Vent Pipes T.O.P. T.O.P. © Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish 7❑ Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters ■ 8 Tile Accent: Decorative Ceramic Tile a !■■ 9❑ Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 10 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door F.F./T.O.G. F.F./T.O.C. "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Scheme# 2 Left and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1': 7 2 6 3 4 a T.D. ROOF TILE CIO +� T.D. SHEATHING ' _• , r I , I, I t ' 11 _ :I I I 1! I I I + I 1'; I I� y, l' __ ' � , 1 I !� I u '� f' �r,,�.• I �` i I I I ! .I , E;' I~ I � ! i I n i � � �;I i l � _ iS i .I i i, •,;. f I 11 r' f 'f�� f; ' I :{ , V _F it 1 I j• r. 1 _ I _ 11 r� ice_ ! [ � � p - . 1, •F L!� .- I ] I �4 1 I - - I� `'' rl i .I i. � �- � I � ; 7���-•i t-!" '`�5. Y`.r Y �i L'-J' ��r'�'- W Y� ..: � may'f'�` � ram■G�+ {j _'r' i { � I r �-t' .J �•-' r i VT rN :.�,._.. I t '�r�' ram.i Y�• •.� `VR. �I �f r � .r� ��r + ij � n n j � r II ■N � }r.. a.] I • ,-�.. 'r�'i �� I �' Rl ]� L �.,�• -� ,f�' 'I � �i r � ■ i.Y�� V V � � �--�r� I ■r 1 � ` i r 1�- I ~fJ �r~ I ''r r �-. �� r�1 I _ - T.O.P. A T.O.P. r �;: r ■■ ,■� ■ UP._, i �■ �■ IBM ISO ■ ■■ ■■ MEN �■ ■■ ■ 1010111 1®■ - ■ ■ ■ F.F. �r_ {• ; r I� _ Ir I R��, i `?� I ; F.F. F.F. i. 1{ ■Y ~d� { I :i !! h 1 11 T.O.P. r" -■-yam-� Y �- I-'r I I` Ix ■ r �-�;;` ,� • I T.O.P. _ _ T.Q.P. ■� �■ ■■ ■i NONEMEN ME ■ �■ ■■ no so ME F.F./T.O.G. F.F./T.O.G. F.F./T.O.C. F.G. RRight 3 6 4 7 1 5 ear 4 2 1 6 7 6 PLAN 2A I SPANISH Building Elevations ETIWANDA 1 ,mA Ill A24 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS ■ 6 2 4 8 16 M NNINGHOMES Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-0" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA -- And Application May Vary. � C� 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 02-04-21 ❑RANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 70'-0" tin II II o I Ico TEMP. GL. TEMP. GL. 2650 SH 2650 SH Covered Porch Dining 3050 SH 3050 SH 20'-111 x 1 2'-011 �� �� 2650 FX 2650 FX 2650 FX F]C/D 0 x o � / N = O U:) 0 3050 SH 5050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 5050 FX 3050 SH o M ----------- ------------ --------------- L ---- -------- -- HMC/DZ Bedr om 2 M Bath Den CD I I II o N M 131.111 121_211 i 131111 x 31_011 I = I I Tandem Gar ge N I;`� ' 121.911 X 201. 11 Bon s Roo _ AlI _ ___ _ Mast room � ---_A, Ir---- -- - - - - - - I -- 18 -111 X 16'-11 ' i 17 - X 6 -3 M , Great oo I ° ° 18 6 x 19 7 I Kitchen 1_ II III I I I I O ° ° Storage � � I I I II I I ;I g 'I WIC I' = li -- 8'-1011 x 91_711 Cn= -1 Bath 2 171.711 x 91_Q11 o N I I Ll CD Cfl J= L cD� Linen Cfl �� I , �� ----------------------- �� Y -- ----------------------- f7777 ' - Wo Linen i-- - - -- I �i-- �i N I I WIC I I I I Hall I I I I Li en II II II a_ I Shelves Linen Bath 4 ----- I _ Linen ----r--r- - Butler's Panty Storage DIN Linen i o Pan o -- -- 2 Car G rage � � � I I - - - - Bath 3 - - - - � � - � ' --- co ------ I II I II , -�--- I I ----- ----- 21 -7 x 20 -1 N Laundry I ech Loft ----- ----- room _ =====J 1 -0 x 11 3 Co �� ----- ----- --- 111.111 x 101.311 ----- ----- Open To B e l OW ----- ----- co II I i I � � II � -- rrF N ----- Entry I ,, Linen PWdr ----- ----- IIII ----- ----- --- — — -- — -- up 2040 SH 2O40 SH 2O40 SH Bedroom 3 2040 SH 3050 SH 2O40 SH n i n g/D Bedroom 5 13'-1 " x 13'-811 13'-1 " x 13'-11 " 1 ' 111 x 1 " (0 ---------------- ---- 16'-0"x 8'-0"SECT.GAR.DOOR ;X0 2646 SH 2646 SH 2O30 SH 2O30 FX N I � TEMP. GL. _ �I I � � of I� o / C/D Front Porch I 11 I 11 x 7 -6 3056 SH 3056 SH 2056 SH 3056 SH 2O56 SH PLAN 2B CALIFORNIA RANCH 4Y767 SF ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES r.TIWANDA � A205 0 2 4 8 16 Au RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" VJHI © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA ------------------------------------------------ I I I ® I 3:12 I I 3:12 r------------ --------1-1- 1 ' I I _J_L---- ------ ----------- - ------------ 4:12 ------------------------------ I I I I I I -I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I 4:12 4:12 I I j I I I I I I 4:12 4:12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ----------------------------- ----------------------------------i I I I I I I I I I I L---------------------- I - 4:12 i _ ----------- --------------� I I 4:12 L ,I Lr J I I --•` - _ � fir' ,>r '� r�C_ � - 17 Roof Plan 2B I I I R a es ■■ ■. .■ ■■ ■■ ,�■■ .. �� ■. ave s 1 8 ILF ON !MJ ■ ■■ _ _.L_,JJJJJJ J- I_-, _L- I,_.L_,_L__l__,_I._. __L_ LrL _L 1--: .I-I�-�I-1 --_1_J-�.. - �.. J NONE ■■ �� -- ■■ ■■ ■■ _ T U o 01EIE] , Ll 11 Ll I CALIFORNIA RANCH - B Scheme# 5 1 Front 3 1 7 2 10 6 s 5 4 9 11 0 Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof 0 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia With 46 Rafter Tails 0 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board 0 Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Brick Veneer © Gable Accent: Board and Batt Siding & Exposed Wood Corbels 0 Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish ® Window Accent: Brick Accents at Brick Veneer Locations 0 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 2B I CALIFORNIA RANCH Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA LA Ill A26 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS ■ M NNINGHOMES � 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA CALIFORNIA RANCH - B _ T.O.P. - - 6 - T.O.P. 1 Roof: Concrete "S" Tile Roof - ❑2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia With 46 Rafter Tails = ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ �■ 3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■ �� NEI ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board - I _ 5❑ Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Brick Veneer F.F. F.F. © - .�Gable Accent: Board and Batt Siding & Exposed Wood Corbels T.O.P. - 7❑ Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish -�p ■■ ® Window Accent: Brick Accents at Brick Veneer Locations r ■■ ■■ ■ r 9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters - NEI ■■ ■ - - I 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door J_ F.FJ.O.C. F.F./T.O.C. 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Scheme# 5 Left and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California31 2 © 3 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. i.u.nuur i ILL +i T.O.SHEATHING _ t I I ',�,�. . 1 1 } I j r ' 1 r� • '} �.• 'G.)' ...i a t + .. -p 1 �. f � I' r 'r S 1 . ` �v���-�Y`�'�c�►'` �.. - - =�- . �,`����_ >�-�`: --ram - T.O.P. - I T.O.P. _, T.O.P. y - - IN ■ ■■ loom ■■ ■■ M MEIN ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ _ I I - - . - - +I F.F. - ...._--..r- •_ - _ _ _ _ _ ;!- - - .�. ..�a.. ■ - v. - '�` �` - • - -,- - - -.I -�- --F F.F. ` --- ' F.F. )Wry TAV— .O.P. ? r , T.O.P. -�■ - - T.O.P. - -- --- Him ■■ ■■ ■ 1--L,_ T n ■u r t __ r G _r1-1 H .1 1 1 .J- I I I ■ ■■ ■■ ■■ ■■ '` .1 - —- - - — r F.F./T.O.C. F.F./T.O.C. �; _ F.F.�T.O.C. F.G. RRight 2 3 7 4 9 8 5 1 6 ear 5 4 6 7 9 7 8 PLAN 2B I CALIFORNIA RANCH Building Elevations ETIWANDA I -,A III A27 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS ■ V 2 4 V 16 MANNINGHOMES Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-0!` RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA -- And Application May Vary. � C 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 1 2020020 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 70'-0" 3060 SH 3060 SH - - - ------ - - ------ II o co TEMP. GL. TEMP. GL. 2650 SH 2650 SH Covered Porch Dining 3050 SH 3050 SH 20'-111 x 1 2'-011 2650 FX 2650 FX 2650 FX x x o ;X0 � N = o cn 0 3050 SH 5050 SH 3050 SH 3050 SH 5050 FX 3050 SH o co ----------- ------------ --------------- L ———— ———————— -- Bedroom 2CD II HMC/DZ M Bath I N Den I LO M 13 -1 12 -2 i 13' 111 x 3'-011 I = I I --- Tandem Gar ge N I I 121.911 X 201_ II Bon s Roo _ II II _ ___ _ Mast room � I, , , -- Fr ---_�, ---- -- — — - - - — I -- 18'-1 " x 16'-11 ' i 17 - x 6 -3 M ,� IIII Great 00 I ° 18 6 x 19 7 I Kitchen = 1_ II III I O Storage e M M I I I I g 'I WIC I' = li -- 8'-1011 X 91_711 Bath 2 171.711 X 91_8 11 o N I I "I J= �C Linen I , �p I � �� ----------------------- LO LU� Y -- --- -71 -------------------- f7777 ' - - , Wo Linen i-- - - -- EI= -4 �N I I WIC I I I I Hall I I I I Li en I I I I I I I I I - II II II a_ I Shelves Linen Bath 4T ----- I _ Linen ----r--r- - Butler's Panty StLorage DIN Linen i LL- o I V1 Pan o -- -- 2 Car G rage � � � � � � � I I - - - - Bath 3 - - - - � � - --- ------ I II I 11 ��`, ,��� � � � � � � � -�--- I I ----- ----- 21 -7 x 20 -1 o ;; N Laundry I ech Loft ----- ----- room =====JBelow1 -0 x 11 3 �, �� ----- ----- I I --- 111-111 x 101-311 ----- ----- Open To ----- ---LO -- II � II N ----- Entry Linen PWdr ----- ----- IIII ----- ----- T 8 IIII \ i i i --- — — -- — -- UP - ------ - 2040 SH 2O40 SH 2O40 SH B e d room 3 2650 SH 2650 SH Bedroom 5 n i n g/D 13'-111 x 13'-811 2040 SH 13 -1 x 13 -11 11 1 11 1 1 1 11 X 1 1 11 16'-0"x 8'-0"SECT.GAR.DOOR 2646 SH 2646 SH 4f 2O30 SH 2O30 FX __ = TEMP. GL. _ Ca �, "' co "' o CD co U' = N N Front Porch co 3050 SH 3050 SH 20'-1 " X 7'-6" 3056 SH 3056 SH 2056 SH 3056 SH 2O56 SH I� 1�/_Z�II1IZ«II117�111/_7�I_Z PLAN 2C FARMHOUSE 4Y767 SF ETIWANDA C1 �Ilcs III A208 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES 0 2 4 8 16 Scale: 1/4"= 1 '-0" Au RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA © 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. I 2020020 I 02-04-21 ORANGE COUNTY . LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA r------------------------------------------------------- I 3:12 3:12 r------------ --------1-i--I I I I I I � ------------------------------ ------- I I I I � I 4:12 I I I 7ri V r Cp j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I j I I I I 6:12 6:12 I I j I I I I I I 6:12 6:12 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ®® I ----------------------------- r------------ --------------------� 4:12 L---------------------r ----------i I I L ----------------- ------- I I I 4:12 i r r 7�7v i 4`6 46 L - Lr J L--------------------------------J ` �. 11 r;7. .1 r-rr ­7���_r_. 17 -_- . Roof Plan 2C _- Rakes Eaves 12 ll 11 1� I all I .. Ill I J '.J 11 - A- 7 it 17- 1 11 . T, room ■■■ ■■■_ - T-IL JL---L-1 _ __n [IT Scheme# 8Front FARMHOUSE - C 3 3 7 10 6 8 5 4 1 2 11 1❑ Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Roof 02 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia ❑3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish / Vertical Board and Batts ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board ❑5 Veneer: Manufactured Mortared Stone Veneer © Gable Accent: Horizontal Siding ❑7 Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish ® Window Accent: Stucco Over Foam Trim 20/30 sand finish at Stone Veneer Locations ❑9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California 31 Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-V. PLAN 2C I FARMHOUSE Front Elevation & Roof Plan ETIWANDA I A Ill A209 ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS . DESIGNERS M NNINGHOMES � 0 2 4 8 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-�" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HE2MALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 0RANGE COUNTY. LOS ANGELES . BAY AREA 77 I TT —11' t� 11 1. Jr= I J 9 FARMHOUSE - C -- - - - - 1 Roof: Concrete Flat Tile Roof T.O.P. - T.O.P. 1 2 Fascia: Wood 2x3 Fascia == 3 Exterior: Stucco 16/20 sand finish / Vertical Board and Batts ® Barge: Wood 2x6 Barge Board - _-_ - �� . - - 5❑ Veneer. Manufactured Mortared Stone Veneer F.F. =i - � h: F.F. - - © Gable Accent: Horizontal Siding T.O.P. T.O.P. 07 Window/Door Trim: Stucco Color Coat Over Foam Trim Shapes 20/30 sand finish _ - ® Window Accent: Stucco Over Foam Trim 20/30 sand finish at Stone Veneer Locations 9 Shutters: Pre-Manufactured Shutters a - 10 Entry Door: Decorative Front Entry Door y' - 11 Garage Door: Decorative Wood Sectional Garage Door F.F./T.O.C. _-= F.F./T.O.C. "This site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Construction material Scheme# 8 Left and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1': 3 7 9 6 4 5 T.O. ROOF TILE t4 T.O. SHEATHING 777 11 _ - - - - _ 1 - - - _ - - -- -- - - T.O.P. - _ - -- - - fil "- - - - - T.O.P. - - T.U. NEI co ! - F.F. F.F.- lr- ` 1. Jim T.O.P. - - - - -I kk T.O.P. _ -- - T.O.P97 4 - LE F.F./T.O.C. _ = y _ _ F.F./T.O.G. _ I� - — -- — F.F./T.O.C. F.G. 2 4 5 8 1 6 Rear 5 8 4 3 6 7 9 7 Right PLAN 2C I FARMHOUSE Building Elevations ETIWANDA LA Ill A21 0 ARCHITECTS PLANNERS . DESIGNERS ■ M NNINGHOMES Q 2 4 S 16 Note: Artist's Conception; Colors, Materials Scale: 1�4"= 1 '-0" RANCHO CUCAMONGA CA And Application May Vary. � 2020 WILLIAM HEZMALHALCH ARCHITECTS, INC. dba WHA. 2020020 102-04-21 ❑RANGE COUNTY . L-OS ANGELES . BAY AREA DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS March 16, 2021 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20334, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139, MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2020-00141 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics: The undeveloped project site is located on the east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Plan, and south of Banyan Street. The site is approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line. The existing grade is approximately 1,491 feet along the north property line and 1,477 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 14 feet. Onsite vegetation includes native and non-native vegetation and a eucalyptus windrow along the north and south property lines. The street improvements along both East Avenue and Golden Lock Place have not been installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West Single-Family Residences I Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District Protect Overview: The applicant is requesting to subdivide (SUBTT20334) 10.24 acres of land located within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots (A-D) will be used as open space and (including the required equestrian trail) will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association. Access to the residences will be provided by a public street that will connect East Avenue to Golden Lock Place. Exhibit C DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139 - MANNING HOMES March 16, 2021 Page 2 The applicant proposes developing the project site using the Optional Development Standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards permit up to 2 dwelling units per acre, which is the same maximum density permitted under the basic development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards allow for smaller lot sizes in exchange for providing additional common open space area (minimum 25 percent of the net project site). The project will provide 25.7 percent common open space including citrus groves on Lettered Lots A, B, and D, and an open grass area with bench seating on Lot C. The project will provide 67.1 percent total open space, which includes both private and common open space areas, exceeding the 65 percent required total open space. Both the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan require that residential projects within the Equestrian Overlay District provide trail connections. The proposed equestrian trail will provide an east-west trail connection between East Avenue and Golden Lock Place, which is an easement on the lots to the north. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below. Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes `Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses Architecture: The project includes the Design Review (DRC2020-00139) for the residences on the 17 proposed lots. The Etiwanda Specific Plan requires that projects with 11-20 units provide a minimum of 3 different floor plans and 3 elevations per floor plan. The Etiwanda Specific Plan allows reverse footprints to be counted as separate floor plans. The project provides four (4) separate floor plans (2 of which are reverse footprints) with three (3) different elevations for each floor plan, Spanish, farmhouse, and California Ranch (Plan 2 also includes 2 different color schemes per elevation). The Development Code requires that projects consisting of 4 or more units include a minimum of 25 percent single-story plans. The project includes 5 single-story floor plans. Each floor plan and architectural variation includes wall and roof plane articulation and carries the architectural design theme to each elevation (360-degree architecture). Each plan includes design elements that emphasize the chosen architectural style including the use of stone veneer, wood siding, exposed rafter tails, architecturally correct window and door surrounds, window shutters, wrought iron accents, and tile roofs. The plans include the use of decorative garage and front entry doors that emphasize the architectural style. Plan #1 is single-story with 3,511 square feet of living area and a 672 square foot 3-car garage. Plan #2 is two-story with 4,413 square feet of living area and a 908 square foot 4-car garage. DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139 - MANNING HOMES March 16, 2021 Page 3 Staff Comments: Staff supports the overall project and the use of the optional development standards, which will allow houses to face both sides of the proposed new street. The use of the basic development standards would have resulted in a single- loaded street with lots that were much deeper and larger than those in the surrounding area. The inclusion of the equestrian trail will provide a trail connection between East Avenue and Golden Lock Place. The proposed Minor Exception for wall height along the south property line is necessary due to the on-site grades. Major/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Design Review Committee consider the design (building architecture, site planning, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: QRecommend approval of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant; or ❑Recommend approval with modifications to the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission; or ❑Recommend conditional approval of the design of the project by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission; or ❑Recommend denial of the design of the project as proposed by the applicant. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Trails Advisory Committee March 10, 2021 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20334, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139, MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2020-00141 AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics: The undeveloped project site is located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street. The site is approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line. The existing grade is approximately 1,491 feet along the north property line and 1,477 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 14 feet. Onsite vegetation includes native and non-native vegetation and a eucalyptus windrow along the north and south property lines. The street improvements along both East Avenue and Golden Lock Place have not been installed. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low (VL) ResidentialDistrict* Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Residential North Vacant Lot Very Low District* Single-Family Residence Very Low (VL) Residential South Vacant Lot Very Low District* East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) ResidentialDistrict* *Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District Protect Overview: The applicant is requesting to subdivide (SUBTT20334) 10.24 acres of land located on the east side of East Avenue and south of Banyan Street. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The lettered Lots (A-D) are designated as common open space and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association (including the equestrian trail). Access Exhibit D TAC COMMENTS TTM SUBTT20334 - MANNING HOMES March 10, 2021 Page 2 to the residences will be provided by a public street that will connect East Avenue to Golden Lock Place. The applicant proposes developing the project site using the Optional Development Standards as shown in Figure 5-3 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards permit up to 2 dwelling units per acre, which is the same maximum density permitted under the basic development standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The optional development standards allow for smaller lot sizes in exchange for providing additional common open space area (minimum 25 percent of the net project site). The project will provide 25.7 percent common open space including citrus groves on Lettered Lots A, B, and D, and an open grass area with bench seating on Lot C. The project will provide 67.1 percent total open space, which includes both private and common open space areas, exceeding the 65 percent required total open space. As proposed, the project will have a density of 1.66 units per acre. The Optional Development Standards do not include a minimum or average required lot size. The proposed lots will range in size from 15,272 square feet to 16,765 square feet, with an average lot size of 16,200 square feet. Per the Development Code, the minimum lot size required to keep horses in the City is 20,000 square feet (per horse). Similarly, Section 5.505 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan states: Up to one horse/10,000sq. ft. of total project area [is allowed], provided however, that no horses may be kept on individual lots smaller than 20,000 sq. ft. As the lots are under 20,000 square feet, the future homeowners within this subject subdivision will not be permitted to keep horses. Section 5.506 of the Etiwanda Specific Plan states that projects developed under the optional development standards shall provide a trail connection across the project site, with the intention of providing a contiguous system of feeder trails easements. The General Plan states that new development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay are required to provide community and local trail for equestrian use. The project provides an east-west trail connection along the south property line between East Avenue and Golden Lock Place, which is an easement on the lots to the north. The proposed private equestrian trail will have a minimum width of 15 feet, with wider vehicle trail gates and horse step throughs at each end of the trail, along with a cover of decomposed granite and a two rail PVC fence on both sides of the equestrian trail easement. Staff Comments: Staff supports the proposed 17 lot Tentative Tract map (SUBTT20334) and the use of the optional development standards, which will allow houses to face both sides of the proposed public street. The use of the basic development standards would have resulted in a single-loaded street with lots that were much deeper and larger than those in the surrounding area. The project is in conformance with both the General Plan and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, which require that projects within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District provide a trail connection across the project site to continue to expand the trail network within the City. The project includes a private equestrian trail connection between East Avenue and Golden Lock Place. TAC COMMENTS TTM SUBTT20334 - MANNING HOMES March 10, 2021 Page 3 Major/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. None Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee consider the multi-purpose trails (layout, design/technical details, etc.) of the proposed project and recommend the selected action below to the Planning Commission: x❑Recommend Approval multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant; or El Recommend denial multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant; or ❑Recommend approval with modifications to the multi-purpose trails by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be verified by staff prior to review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission; or ❑Recommend conditional approval of the multi-purpose trails by incorporating revisions requested by the Committee. Follow-up review by the Committee is not required. The revisions shall be Conditions of Approval and verified by staff during plan check after review and action by the Planning Director/ Planning Commission; or El Recommend denial of the multi-purpose trails as proposed by the applicant. Trails Advisory Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration h 1�..- nn a .. Prepared for City of Rancho Cucamonga March 24, 2021 �n r� appliedplanning ins Exhibit E Table of Contents Section Page Preface: Project Description 1.1 Overview.................................................................................................P-1 1.2 Project Location......................................................................................... P-1 1.3 Existing Land Uses.................................................................................... P-1 1.4 Existing Land Use Designations ...............................................................P-5 1.5 Project Elements ....................................................................................... P-8 1.6 Project Opening Year ............................................................................. P-21 1.7 Project Objectives .................................................................................. P-21 1.8 Discretionary Approvals and Permits......................................................P-21 Part I: Environmental Information Form Part II: Environmental Checklist Form Part III: Mitigation Monitoring Program Appendix A: Arborist Report: On-Site Tree Inspection and Inventory Follow-up Report, Tentative Tract 20334, East Avenue, North of Blue Gum, Etiwanda [City of Rancho Cucamonga], CA [Jim Borer, Certified Arborist #496] March 2, 2021 . Appendix B: Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis: Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga [Greve & Associates, LLC] June 1, 2020 (Revised February 24, 2021). Appendix C: Biological Resource Survey: Habitat and Jurisdictional Assessment for the Proposed Residential Development Located within Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0225-191-17 and 0225-191-09 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (ELMT Consulting) March 3, 2021. Appendix D: Cultural Resource Survey: Cultural Resources Assessment, East Avenue and Banyan Street Alternative 6 Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (LSA Associates, Inc.) February 2021. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table of Contents Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page i Appendix E: Energy Assessment: Energy Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 22, 2020 (Revised March 1, 2021). Appendix F: Geotechnical Investigation: Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 10-Acre Residential Development Tract 20334, East of East Avenue Approximately 300 Feet South of Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) June 10, 2020 (Updated February 22, 2021). Appendix G: Phase I and Phase I I Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 6179 and 6183 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) September 3, 2020 (Revised February 26, 2021). Appendix H: Hydrology Report/WQMP: Tentative Tract 20334, Rancho Cucamonga, Drainage Study (Encompass Associates, Inc.) December 21, 2020. Appendix I: Noise Impact Analysis: Noise Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC)April 30, 2020 (Revised March 4, 2021). Appendix J: AB 52 Consultation Documentation East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table of Contents Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page ii List of Figures and Tables Figure Pace 1.2-1 Project Location......................................................................... Preface, Page P-3 1.3-1 Existing Land Uses ......................................................................Preface, Page P-4 1.4-1 Existing General Plan Land Use Designations............................Preface, Page P-6 1.4-2 Existing Zoning Designations.......................................................Preface, Page P-7 1.5-1 Site Plan Concept...................................................................... Preface, Page P-10 1.5-2 Architectural Concepts ............................................................. Preface, Page P-11 1.5-3 Architectural Concepts ............................................................. Preface, Page P-12 1.5-4 Architectural Concepts ............................................................. Preface, Page P-13 1.5-5 Landscape Plan ........................................................................ Preface, Page P-15 1.5-6 Landscape Plan......................................................................... Preface, Page P-16 1.5-7 Landscape Plan......................................................................... Preface, Page P-17 Table Page 3-1 Attainment Status Designations................................................ Section II, Page 15 3-2 Construction-Source Emissions Summary ............................... Section II, Page 16 3-3 Maximum Daily Construction-Source Emissions ...................... Section II, Page 17 3-4 Operational-Source Localized Emissions Summary................. Section II, Page 18 3-5 Maximum Daily Operational-Source Emissions........................ Section II, Page 18 3-6 Maximum Construction-Source Localized Emissions ............... Section II, Page 20 3-7 Maximum Operational-Source Localized Emissions Summary Section II, Page 21 6-1 Energy Plan Consistency.......................................................... Section II, Page 44 6-2 Summary of Energy Usage....................................................... Section II, Page 47 8-1 Construction GHG Emissions................................................... Section 11, Page 54 8-2 Annual Project Emissions......................................................... Section II, Page 55 11-1 Development Standards ........................................................... Section II, Page 68 13-1 Relative Increase in Noise Levels from Increased Traffic ......... Section II, Page 76 17-1 Project Trip Generation............................................................. Section II, Page 87 111-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program................................................... Section III, Page 3 East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table of Contents Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page iii Preface: Project Description PREFACE: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 OVERVIEW The East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) proposes development of a 21-lot residential subdivision, to include 17 single-family homes and the creation of 4 open space parcels. For the purposes of this IS/MND, the Project is assumed to be completed and occupied by 2023. 1.2 PROJECT LOCATION The approximately 10-acre Project site is located in the northerly portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). As shown on Figure 1.2-1, the Project site is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and Blue Gum Drive, approximately one-third mile northerly of Interstate 210 (1-210), and approximately one mile westerly of Interstate 15 (1-15). 1.3 EXISTING LAND USES Project site and vicinity land uses are depicted on Figure 1.3-1 and are described below. 1.3.1 Project Site Land Use The Project site is undeveloped. The majority of the site is heavily disturbed due to historic agricultural uses and on-going weed abatement activities. Eucalyptus and Evergreen Ash trees in various states of health/decline exist within the Project site. Per the Project Arborist Report: "There is a total of 129 trees, alive, dead standing, and stumps that have been numbered and flagged with orange surveyor tape in the field...The total of 129 extends as follows: • 66-dead standing trees (including 1-ash) • 43-alive trees (including 4-ash and 4-street tree red iron bark Eucalyptus) • 20-Eucalyptus stumps"(Project Arborist Report, p. 1). East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-1 The easternmost portion of the Project site supports native Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) that historically occurred in the area prior to urbanization of the City. This RAFSS has been significantly degraded by its complete isolation from Etiwanda Creek. The area has been further degraded by the invasion of a eucalyptus forest, a non-native plant community that further degrades riparian habitat. This plant community no longer functions as RAFSS habitat, and no longer has long-term conservation value. Other areas of the Project site are sparsely vegetated with non- native grassland species. 1.3.2 Vicinity Land Uses Westerly of the Project site across East Avenue, and easterly of the Project site across Golden Lock Place, properties are developed with single-family residential subdivisions. Northerly adjacent to the Project site are three scattered single-family residences with associated ancillary outbuildings. Northerly adjacent properties are otherwise predominantly vacant and disturbed with scattered ornamental vegetation. The easterly portions of these properties support the previously-described degraded RAFSS habitat that continues southerly along the easterly boundary of the Project site. Farther to the north, approximately 400 feet from the Project site across Banyan Street, is Summit Intermediate School. Southerly adjacent to the Project site is vacant land with an associated single-family residence with outbuildings. Interstate 210 (1-210) exists in an east — west orientation approximately 0.3 miles southerly of the Project site. East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-2 • Wilson Avenucri � 1. 14 �' E.0 `:� #• �. 4 Ai 49 Jr anyan StreetAMY F, +01L i Project Site Oe ' V f LLJ 21, i210'i pip w w f w � sir}5 � , i ■ i • � r w r f F .I O w� + Single Family s t . Residential Cn S ooi Vacant Banyan Street ------------------------ "'�"I- -� Project Site 'Single Family �� Single Family Residential _ _ _.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..Y ¢� Residegtia .0. ` =tea o�`Je � e Vacant. o . - _ �� - J - `,)e G t a dr 'w_ A Single Family •' �' If, Si gle Family�`Llr F Residential r Residential ! '� - -_ - x 1.4 EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Existing land use designations are presented on Figures 1.4-1 through 1 .4-2. 1.4.1 Project Site Land Use Designations The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site is Residential — Very Low (0.1 — 2.0 DU/AC). The Project site is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Specific Plan) and Zoning of the site is established by the Specific Plan. Within the Specific Plan, the site is designated as Residential VL:Very Low (1 — 2 DU/AC). The Project proposes development of the approximately 10-acre site with up to 17 single-family residences at an average density of 1.7 DU/AC. The Project's proposed single-family residential uses and proposed residential density are permitted under the Project site's existing General Plan Land Use designation. Development of the Project site would conform to requirements of the Specific Plan. The Project does not propose or require any General Plan or Zoning amendments. 1.4.2 Vicinity Land Use Designations As with the Project site, adjacent properties on all sides have a General Plan Land Use designation of Residential — Very Low (0.1-2.0 DU/AC). Zoning designation of adjacent properties is established by the Specific Plan. As with the Project site, the Specific Plan designation of surrounding properties is Residential VL:Very Low (1-2 DU/AC). Further north, across Banyan Street, General Plan Land Use/Zoning designations are Public Facility — School, and Public Facility— Park. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-5 BanPM4111ftet r C� - • I Project Site a� � . W � o 4 x GENERAL PLAN LEGEND Residential -Very Low(0.1-2.0 du/ac) Schools (0.10 -0.20 FAR) Parks N NOT TO SCALE Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Map;Applied Planning,Inc. n,0101 Figure 1.4-1 a p p l i e d p l a n n i n g General Plan Land Use Designations inc ER ONE - Banyan.Street l — VL L Project Site I L ql � VL I ZONING LEGEND Very Low Residential(VL) Estate Residential (ER) School (S) N 0 NOT TO SCALE Source: City of Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Map;Applied Planning,Inc. I'101 Figure 1.4-2 a p p l i e d p[a n n i n g Zoning Designations inc 1.5 PROJECT ELEMENTS 1.5.1 Construction Information 1.5.1.1 Site Preparation The Project site would be grubbed, rough-graded, and fine-graded in preparation of building construction. Any debris generated during site preparation activities would be disposed of and/or recycled consistent with the City's Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE). Existing grades within the Project site would be modified to establish suitable building pads and to facilitate site drainage. The current grading concept proposes balanced cut/fill within the Project, with minimal import or export of soils. 1.5.1.2 Construction Traffic Management Plan Temporary and short-term traffic detours and traffic disruptions could result during Project construction activities. The Project Applicant would be responsible for the preparation and submittal of a construction area traffic management plan (Plan) to be reviewed and approved by the City, if required. Typical elements and information incorporated in the Plan would include but would not be limited to: • Name of on-site construction superintendent and contact phone number. • Identification of Construction Contract Responsibilities - For example, for excavation and grading activities, describe the approximate depth of excavation, and quantity of soil import/export (if any). • Identification and Description of Truck Routes -to include the number of trucks and their staging location(s) (if any). • Identification and Description of Material Storage Locations (if any). • Location and Description of Construction Trailer (if any). • Identification and Description of Traffic Controls - Traffic controls shall be provided per the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) if the occupation or closure of any traffic lanes, parking lanes, parkways or any other public right-of-way is required. If the right-of-way occupation requires configurations or controls not identified in the MUTCD, a separate traffic control East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-8 plan must be submitted to the City for review and approval. All right-of-way encroachments would require permitting through the City. • Identification and Description of Parking - Estimate the number of workers and identify parking areas for their vehicles. • Identification and Description of Maintenance Measures - Identify and describe measures taken to ensure that the work site and public right-of-way would be maintained (including dust control). If required, the Plan would be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, and provided to all contractors as one component of building plan/contract document packages. 1.5.2 Site Plan Concept Figure 1 .5-1 presents the Project Site Plan Concept. The Project proposes development of 17 single-family homes within an approximately 10-acre site. Residential lot sizes within the Project site would range from 15,272 square feet to 16,765 square feet. Within the Specific Plan, the site is designated as Residential VL:Very Low (1 —2 DU/AC). The Specific Plan establishes Optional Development Standards for development projects of "superior quality and compatibility within any Residential District, except the Estate Residential Districts (HRE and VLE)" (Specific Plan, p. III-97). Optional Development Standards for the VL Residential Zone District are identified on Specific Plan, p. III-101, Table 11 , Optional Development Standards-Residential Districts. The Lead Agency has determined that the Project development concept conforms with the Specific Plan Optional Development Standards for the VL Residential Zone District. 1.5.3 Architectural Design Concepts Preliminary architectural design concepts depict contemporary single-family residential homes along 3 general themes: "Spanish," "Farmhouse," and "California Ranch." One and two-story designs are proposed for each architectural theme. Representative Project architectural concepts are presented on Figures 1.5-2 through 1.5-4. Materials and color finishes have been chosen to be compatible with surrounding land uses. Final Project architectural designs would be reviewed for consistency with the Specific Plan and would be subject to review and approval by the City. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-9 FM 5441 . FOAB 69MR 22 __---------YACANT. - ---- V� —y- --- - ---- r--, � I l BRITTLE BRUSH;m r y= coar air u m /3Es „I L 11 8 15 _ 14 _ 13 - 12 1 1 10 Lot D ' 7W'Ir Nb t-,_ - a - � _ ' yam ��„— � � / I z.,:::; •. mm �m J ____________ 2 _ _ 4 _ 5 6 7 o ,— 1 Lot „ z Lot C R.g � u BLUE GUM xm ^� q pg1 emw s �I DRIVE --------------- - - WILD MAPLE �I � I'- I �•`�,f y ..—.. !� ... COURT N 0 NOT TO SCALE Source:Madole&Associates,Inc.;Applied Planning,Inc. 11l Figure 1.5-1 a p p l i e d p l a n n i n g Site Plan Concept inc F `� aLk - w 1A Spanish Scheme#1 _ quip J. mI UMi�III 1C Farmhouse Scheme#7 1 B California Ranch Scheme#4 PLAN 1 Front Elevations Source:WHA;Applied Planning,Inc. l'1n Figure 1.5-2 a p p l i e d p l a n n i n g Architectural Concepts inc M11 p -*T OR ■Mr , � '.. m ■ �I - 2A Spanish scheme#2 _- it - :i I r - I NONE Mall00 , 1111 1111!11 MORE 2C Farmhouse Scheme#8 2B California Ranch Scheme#5 PLAN 2 Front Elevations Source:WHA;Applied Planning,Inc. nn Figure 1.5-3 a p p l i e d p l a n n i n g Architectural Concepts inc t j yy iiJlAa�,.r• } wr.diit. ��fMy%//,i�lr�f�y•.. eat�--. �ty4 AFt1J '-J ..�M1ri1Y11111RJ74iIMi.7M h�' - �-i MMttrai I I � d t Spanish '�wiiw aArJrwi.ii�' _ _ _ Ilrrir�wr�wwAikwniim�iiw��iew.wane - MINE us ME N NONE on ME ME No on AQ MEMO NONE rwNrr. rarrrr.r ew .urr�x .rrra r��rr� erne w�aw..rirwruJ.wuu�rsw�Ri �- • r,.ar t� wi 11 � ' wi�..Fxi���lp�eN^I•r�ll•!�4-li - rr�'��r J JRR •:" a JL ��u�R Ffl i i3Y M.�ixRl.r4l�MYM4M�- � xYIN: R ■ � �.:� ��•■■ M�My�4y i!A �ti� � II _ r-.� __ was tMICs' .� iJJt-4M.ReRti• .sra ..; xMl.f WifYiYltiFe�eixiwxl�rla�Arwl�u,�I1��AL�-�ir�rZi�--�L� .. .. � �,1 ,^� M3•�_NFrt=�� .-. � A. - miles � mnnnnminiimnwnrnnminuinniw PLAN 2 � I f,� I ] �� •erg: I I I, -_� , 1I� Front Source:WHA;Applied Planning, FigureI appliedplannin • 1.5.4 Landscape Concept The Project landscape concept and plant palette are presented on Figures 1.5-5 through 1.5-7. Perimeter landscaping/streetscaping would be provided consistent with Specific Plan and City requirements. Landscape and streetscape elements would provide shade and visual interest, define entry/access points, and accentuate site and architectural features. As part of the Project landscape concept, two open space "entry landscaping" lots (Lot "A" - 0.36 acres and Lot "B" - 0.20 acres) would be constructed on each side of the Project "A" Street connection to East Avenue. Similarly, two additional landscaping lots (Lot "C" - 0.66 acres and Lot "D" - 0.63 acres) would be constructed on each side of the "A" Street connection to Golden Lock Place. A community parkway would be constructed on the south side of "A" Street. The southeasterly portion of the developed Project site would accommodate Lot "C", an open space area with a concrete walkway and benches. Lot "C" would also contain an underground water quality treatment area. The existing windrow located along the southerly Project site boundary would be replaced with a new windrow with an integrated public equestrian trail. Final Project landscape plans would be reviewed for consistency with the Specific Plan and would be subject to review and approval by the City. 1.5.5 Walls and Screening Screenwalls would be implemented along the Project site boundaries. Final Project screenwall plans would be reviewed for consistency with the Specific Plan and would be subject to review and approval by the City. 1.5.6 Lighting All Project lighting would be designed and implemented consistent with applicable Lighting Guidelines established by the City, and in a manner that precludes potential adverse effects of light overspill to surrounding properties. Final lighting plans would be reviewed for consistency with the Specific Plan and would be subject to review and approval by the City. 1.5.7 Parking Each residential unit would include a minimum 2-car garage. The Project would provide parking consistent with Specific Plan and City standards. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-14 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,METNOp6 AND AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED Me,unF SPFe........ SYSTEMS ARE TO BE IN COMFUANCEWITHCHAPTERTA OF CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA BUILDING CODE,SECTION R337 OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, AND FIRE DISTRICT STNJDAHO 49 1, H,aoM � �MFN O-xmn17 �aFa„ Mnfow�nyo nowfn �xoM P s io 16 I 15 1411—IN I I TYPICAL PRGJELT ENTRY CORNER 1R U.vuu �� JR ER x xnu�es Wls�n aF uN oaIxImfEE � � V � • • •- V — � sneEuvnnox aw[ Jr oeavF .,r.. wrnefAuovrsvA� n n wncane nfxoe. F„�w..,ri W �.l ioa cxFgixc MflWl ILL"A"STREET � -- - w w iaaec v`i,:o'n�°xfrke� _ Ep 14. III LES 1R E �Tn 1 „�E 2 sou i sa i 6 semi.onARoxsnErrLn ,F vef Hilo, iuirNmm°siwwl sFcr�a., �m f: uee o.o.,x,��e.:w:es Jsi� L.,�Nnxn cr_ -ucm uo FOR PLANTING LEGEND 1 PALETTE SEE SHEET L-3 q WALLl FENCE LEGEN6 L . ------ s'rnxfnfus oxxsarwnu)smrrwtx ' -�'EQUAL i ii EQUAL � .....�^-.- s'ruxUus srtLLfenc[ ' 10oa � hsnJM[sMx� . t4AT` ��.� xr�ui Prc rnu[F I'�n,rxe it (p>sssvnri pm wa m ay SAST AVE,THEME wALSB COLUMN ocSIGN rO MATCH ss i^^li sef e,r•;,Ewssmiw,xniuw�Mz+xnxn finexU `l E%I—IMPRWEMENTS ON WEST SIDE CF E46T A4E. On b T—.M,L Source:Frank Radmacher Associates,Inc.;Applied Planning,Inc. I'1n Figure 1.5-5 a p p[i e d p l a n n i n g Landscape Concept inc Ave iv-0 000 00006 00000000 *000#00000000000050 � r � SNOW ,Mr ,fir mom rwre srn , �.a • SITE CONSTRUCTION/AMENITIES DETAILS TYPICAL FRONT YARD PLANTING 11 PLAN 213 ' fm�,�„� �,�� ,•��..�. �If•�,.Q��.m"�' Ra�,R�r�owaoxa'f a i i v e,yn�nog.,n,ma il.,aw awcE laµp,avw '�' 'm��o �' ruriW�+sa a.+aa A IIT•FACE WALL k�rw BFLR•FAGE COLVN•ee°rv�re,mnc M!TAL ealVATIONY� � V V 'A'MEET PLAN i I 16 .,�aaw,a,w.aa„ m>�,a,..,,°, �o�a a„ua,aax�RxxR u•aa.,,.�ioxmxi• xa "'+o.' POI.RBE'Nblcmeo rauue,m rus,smm CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,METHODS ANDAUTOMATC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS ARE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER TA OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE,SECTION R337 OF THE CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE, AND FIRE DISTRICT STANDARD 49-1. 'A'STREET TnEE iESENo xmE: PLANT LEGEND THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN THE DESIGNATED WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE FIRE AREA ••1�1 w�uoRNs „� �. � °,,, m'reF M i,,,,—„ °" ®"°°'"°"�•"°'- iiawxnvnu rx°r w..nr°.w,xwr awi.rn aF. , nxxc�.lwslnFsnaarxn a NIGH IM ZONE 1 CITY P WRING RZ2IRICNON NOES; avw„oxawww '~ n°,.owa. Nfe za:i�� . r wela�maeunrylox owervl[Nu�arowxrssinG sxnuaec,assR,wx ax• o a wchamaa,ln3snw eEnosaR nuxs'nam eulaoll,�wlxoovr. IxSSNR�es�vihG IsrnxFH31.nxon mlxlM°an r s..[e nwsrE.anxxrwxm .m. isrxRsei,]wonrnixiMuw�vmue Musr ee muxruxEu °..00a,a,..,,,aww,.a. r.„,b..,w- sea w.. w a..s ,w v��sxxo-moEasa-oR�ssix xoranmavas urawm.o�ttxv.o�ma,R Source:Frank Radmacher Associates,Inc.;Applied Planning,Inc. I'1n Figure 1.5-7 a p p[i e d p l a n n i n g Landscape Concept inc 1.5.8 Infrastructure/Utilities Infrastructure and utilities that would serve the Project site are summarized below. 1.5.8.1 Water Service Water service would be provided to the Project by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD, District). Water service extensions to the Project site would connect to existing facilities located in adjacent East Avenue. Final locations and alignments of service lines, and connection to existing services would be provided as required by the City and CVWD. A "Will-Serve Letter" for water service from CVWD indicating CVWD ability and capacity to meet the Project's water demands is provided at Appendix H. 1.5.8.2 Sanitary Sewer Service Sanitary sewer services would be provided to the Project by the Inland Empire Utility Agency (IEUA). Sanitary sewer service extensions to the Project site would connect to existing facilities located in adjacent East Avenue. Final locations and alignments of service lines, and connection to existing services would be provided as required by the City and IEUA. Wastewater generated by the Project would be conveyed by City/Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) wastewater conveyance facilities to treatment plants operated by the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA) IEUA Regional Water Recycling Plant No. 4 is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. IEUA Regional Water Recycling Plants provide tertiary wastewater treatment, producing effluent suitable for reuse in non-potable applications. A "Will-Serve Letter" for sewer service from CVWD indicating CVWD/IEUA ability and capacity to meet the Project's sewer demands is provided at IS/MND Appendix H. 1.5.8.3 Storm Water Management Systems The Project storm water management system, as approved by the City, would implement drainage improvements and programs acting to control and treat storm water pollutants. In summary, with implementation of the Project storm water management system, storm water runoff intercepted from offsite areas and stormwaters from the developed Project site would be directed in a controlled manner to existing storm drains. An underground stormwater biotreatment and infiltration BMP would be constructed in the southeasterly portion of the Project site. This biotreatment and infiltration BMP has been designed to accept and treat the Design Capture Volume (DCV). Components of the Project storm water management system would include a City- approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). Through implementation of the SWPPP and WQMP, the East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-18 Project would comply with requirements of the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit and other water quality requirements and storm water management programs specified by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). In combination, implementation of the Project storm water management system including the Project SWPPP, WQMP, and compliance with NPDES Permit and RWQCB requirements act to protect City and regional water quality by preventing or minimizing potential storm water pollutant discharges to the watershed. 1.5.8.4 Solid Waste Management It is anticipated that Project-generated solid waste would be conveyed by existing service providers to the Mid-Valley Landfill. Solid waste transport services for the City are provided by Burrtec Waste Industries 1.5.8.5 Electricity The Project would connect to existing Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission lines located in adjacent East Avenue. New lines installed by the Project would be placed underground. Any necessary surface-mounted equipment, such as transformers, meters, service cabinets, and the like, would be screened and would conform to City building setback requirements. To allow for, and facilitate, Project construction activities, provision of temporary SCE electrical services improvements may be required. The scope of such temporary improvements is consistent with, and reflected within, the total scope of development proposed by the Project. Similarly, impacts resulting from the provision of temporary SCE services would not be substantively different from, or greater than, impacts resulting from development of the Project in total. 1.5.8.6 Natural Gas Natural gas service would be provided by the Southern California Gas (SoCalGas). Existing service lines would be extended to the Project uses. Alignment of service lines and connection to existing services would be as required by the City and SoCalGas. To allow for, and facilitate, Project construction activities, provision of temporary SoCalGas gas services improvements may be required. The scope of such temporary improvements is consistent with, and reflected within, the total scope of development proposed by the Project. Similarly, impacts resulting from the provision of temporary SoCalGas services would not be substantively different from, or greater than, impacts resulting from development of the Project in total. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-19 1.5.8.7 Communications Services Communications services, including wired and wireless telephone and internet services, are available through numerous private providers and would be provided on an as- needed basis. As with electrical service lines, all existing and proposed wires, conductors, conduits, raceways, and similar communications improvements within the Project area would be installed underground. Any necessary surface-mounted equipment, e.g., terminal boxes, transformers, meters, service cabinets, etc., would be screened and would conform to City building setback requirements. 1.5.9 Fire and Police Protection Services Police and fire protection services are currently available to the Project site, and are listed below. • Fire Protection Services: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. • Police Protection Services: San Bernardino County Sheriff under contract to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1.5.10 Energy Efficiency/Sustainability Energy-saving and sustainable design features and operational programs would be incorporated into all facilities developed pursuant to the Project. Notably, the Project would comply with the California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen; CCR, Title 24, Part 11) as implemented by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project also incorporates and expresses the following design features and attributes promoting energy efficiency and sustainability. • The Project in total would comply with incumbent Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 6); • To reduce water demands and associated energy use, the Project would be required to implement a Water Conservation Strategy and demonstrate a minimum 20 percent reduction in indoor water usage when compared to baseline water demand (total expected water demand without implementation of the Water Conservation Strategy). Project site development would also be required to implement the following: East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-20 o Landscaping palette emphasizing drought-tolerant plants consistent with provisions of the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and/or City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements; o Use of water-efficient irrigation techniques consistent with City of Rancho Cucamonga requirements; o U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Certified WaterSense labeled or equivalent faucets, high-efficiency toilets (HETs), and other plumbing fixtures. 1.6 PROJECT OPENING YEAR The proposed East Avenue Residential Project would be developed in a manner responsive to market conditions and in concert with availability of necessary infrastructure and services. For the purposes of this analysis, the Project Opening Year is defined as 2023. 1.7 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The primary goal of the Project is to develop a high-quality residential community. Complementary Project Objectives include the following: • Maximize development potential of the underutilized site by implementing single- family residential products; • Take advantage of available infrastructure; enhance and improve local infrastructure systems to the benefit of the Project and surrounding areas; and • Provide a residential development that expands and diversifies the locally available housing stock; and that responds to the current and projected demand for single-family residential products within the City. 1.8 DISCRETIONARY APPROVALS AND PERMITS Discretionary actions permits and related consultation(s) necessary to approve and implement the Project include, but are not limited to, the following. 1.8.1 Lead Agency Discretionary Actions and Permits • Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-21 • Approval of a Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT20334); • Approval of Design Review (DRC2020-00139); • Tree Removal Permit (DRC2020-00140); • Minor exception for wall height (DRC2020-00141); and • All other associated building and engineering permits for construction. 1.8.2 Other Consultation and Permits Based on the current Project design concept, anticipated consultation and permits necessary to realize the proposal would likely include, but are not limited to the following: • Tribal Resources consultation with requesting Tribes as provided for under AB 52, Gatto. Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act. • Permitting may be required by/through the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) pursuant to requirements of the City's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. City NPDES Permit requirements can be accessed at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/9d430sv4co9exvm/AABOVEtBU8ySSSgde5EJrTLYa ?dl=0. • Permitting may be required by/through the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for certain equipment or land uses that may be implemented within the Project area. • Permitting (i.e., utility connection permits) may be required from utility providers. • Other ministerial permits necessary to realize all on- and off-site improvements related to the development of the site. East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Project Description Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Page P-22 Part I : Environmental Information Form Print Form ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Part I - Initial Study) RANCHO (Please type or print clearly using ink. Use the tab key to move from one line to the next line.) CUCAMONGA Planning Department (909)477-2750 The purpose of this form is to inform the City of the basic components of the proposed project so that the City may review the project pursuant to City Policies, Ordinances, and Guidelines; the California Environmental Quality Act; and the City's Rules and Procedures to Implement CEQA. It is important that the information requested in this application be provided in full. Upon review of the completed Initial Study Part I and the development application, additional information such as, but not limited to, traffic, noise, biological, drainage, and geological reports may be required. The project application will not be deemed complete unless the identified special studies/reports are submitted for review and accepted as complete and adequate. The project application will not be scheduled for Committees' review unless all required reports are submitted and deemed complete for staff to prepare the Initial Study Part II as required by CEQA. In addition to the filing fee, the applicant will be responsible to pay or reimburse the City, its agents, officers, and/or consultants for all costs for the preparation, review, analysis, recommendations, mitigations, etc., of any special studies or reports. GENERAL O. INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL NOT BE PROCESSED. Please note that it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the application is complete at the time of submittal; City staff will not be available to perform work required to provide missing information. Application Number for the project to which this form pertains: SU BTT20334 Project Title: East Avenue Residential Project Name&Address of project owner(s): Manning Homes 20151 SW Birch Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of developer or project sponsor.- Manning Homes 20151 SW Birch Street, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 1 of 10 Contact Person&Address: Craig Kozma, Manning Homes, 20151 SW Birch Street, Suite 150, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Name&Address of person preparing this form(if different from above): Applied Planning, Inc. 11762 De Palma Road, 1-C 310, Corona, CA 92883 Telephone Number: (949)250-4200 PROJECT • ' • I • Information indicated by an asterisk(*)is not required of non-construction CUP's unless otherwise requested by staff. *1) Provide a full scale(8-1/2 x 11)copy of the USGS Quadrant Sheet(s) which includes the project site, and indicate the site boundaries. 2) Provide a set of color photographs that show representative views into the site from the north, south, east, and west, views into and from the site from the primary access points that serve the site;and representative views of significant features from the site. Include a map showing location of each photograph. 3) Project Location(describe): The Project site is located at the northeast corner of East Avenue and Blue Gum Drive, approximately one-third mile northerly of Interstate 210 (1-210), and approximately one mile westerly of Interstate 15 (1-15). 4) Assessor's Parcel Numbers(attach additional sheet if necessary): 0225-191-17, 0225-191-09 *5) Gross Site Area(ac/sq. ft.): 10.24 *6) Net Site Area(total site size minus area of public streets&proposed 9.74 dedications): 7) Describe any proposed general plan amendment or zone change which would affect the project site (attach additional sheet if necessary): The Project does not propose or require any General Plan or Zoning amendments. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 2 of 10 8) Include a description of all permits which will be necessary from the City of Rancho Cucamonga and other governmental agencies in order to fully implement the project: •Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration; •Approval of a Tentative Tract Map (SUBTT20334); •Approval of Design Review(DRC2020-00139); • Tree Removal Permit(DRC2020-00140); • Minor exception for wall height(DRC2020-00141); and •All other associated building and engineering permits for construction. 9) Describe the physical setting of the site as it exists before the project including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, mature trees, trails and roads, drainage courses, and scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on site(including age and condition)and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of significant features described. In addition, cite all sources of information (i.e.,geological and/or hydrologic studies, biotic and archeological surveys, traffic studies): The Project site is undeveloped. The majority of the site is heavily disturbed due to historic agricultural uses and on-going weed abatement activities. Eucalyptus and Evergreen Ash trees in various states of health/decline exist along the Project boundaries. Trees considered to be viable candidates for conservation would be preserved in place if/as required by the City. The easternmost portion of the Project site supports native habitat(Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub)that historically occurred in the area prior to urbanization of the City. Native habitat areas within the Project site would not be developed or otherwise disturbed by the Project. Other areas of the Project site are sparsely vegetated with non-native grassland species. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Item 4. Sources: Project Arborist Report(IS/MND Appendix A), Project Habitat and Jurisdictional Assessment (IS/MND Appendix C). Updated 4/11/2013 Page 3 of 10 10) Describe the known cultural and/or historical aspects of the site. Cite all sources of information(books,published reports and oral history): No known cultural and/or historical aspects are present. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Item 5. Source: Project Project Cultural Resources Assessment(IS/MND Appendix D). 11) Describe any noise sources and their levels that now affect the site(aircraft,roadway noise,etc.)and how they will affect proposed uses: Vehicular-source noise from existing adjacent roadways is the main source of noise affecting the site. Vehicular-source noise levels received at the Project site range from 50.9 to 54.2 dBA CNEL. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Item 13. Source: Project Noise Impact Analysis (IS/MND Appendix 1). 12) Describe the proposed project in detail. This should provide an adequate description of the site in terms of ultimate use that will result from the proposed project. Indicate if there are proposed phases for development, the extent of development to occur with each phase, and the anticipated completion of each increment. Attach additional sheet(s)if necessary: The Project proposes development of a 21-lot residential subdivision, to include17 single-family homes and 4 open space lots. The Project will construct all required on-site improvements including but not limited to landscaping, screening and roadways/sidewalks. The Project will implement all necessary utilities improvements. For analytic purposes, the Project is assumed to be completed and occupied by 2023 (Project Opening Year). No Project phasing is proposed. See also Initial Study"Preface: Project Description." 13) Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical, or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use(residential, commercial, etc.),intensity of land use(one-family,apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.)and scale of development(height, frontage, setback, rear yard, etc.): Easterly and westerly of the Project site, properties are developed with single-family residential subdivisions. Northerly adjacent to the Project site are 3 scattered single-family residences with associated ancillary outbuildings. Northerly adjacent properties are otherwise predominantly vacant and disturbed. Southerly adjacent to the Project site is the Cassaza Christmas Tree Farm and an associated single-family residence. See also Initial Study"Preface: Project Description," Figure 1.3-1. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 4 of 10 14) Will the proposed project change the pattern,scale, or character of the surrounding general area of the project? No. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential development in an area of the City designated for such development. The Project residential uses are compatible with existing adjacent uses. The Project does not propose or require any change of land use designations. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Item 1. 15) Indicate the type of short-term and long-term noise to be generated,including source and amount. How will these noise levels affect adjacent properties and on-site uses? What methods of soundproofing are proposed? Project construction activities would generate short-term noise. Project traffic would comprise long-term noise sources. As mitigated, maximum noise levels received at area properties would not exceed City Noise Ordinances standards. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Item 13. Source: Project Noise Impact Analysis (IS/MND Appendix 1). *16) Indicate proposed removals and/or replacements of mature or scenic trees: Twenty-one heritage trees (trees that are minimum 20-inch diameter at breast height [DBH], minimum 30-feet high)will be removed. Tree removal(s)will comply with provisions of a City-Approved Tree Removal Permit. A total of 232 trees will be planted be Project-- of these, 65 are Eucalyptus tree replacement. Please also refer to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Items 1 and 4. Source: Project Arborist Report(IS/MND Appendix A). 17) Indicate any bodies of water(including domestic water supplies)into which the site drains: None. 18) Indicate expected amount of water usage. (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification, please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. 985 a. Residential(gal/day) 11, Peak use(gal/Day) b. Commercial/Ind. (gal/day/ac) Peak use(gal/min/ac) 19) Indicate proposed method of sewage disposal. ❑ Septic Tank xQ Sewer. If septic tanks are proposed, attach percolation tests. If discharge to a sanitary sewage system is proposed indicate expected daily sewage generation: (See Attachment A for usage estimates). For further clarification,please contact the Cucamonga Valley Water District at(909) 987-2591. 4,590 a. Residential(gal/day) b. Commercial/Industrial(gal/day/ac) Updated 4/11/2013 Page 5 of 10 RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS: 20 Number of residential units: 17 Detached(indicate range of parcel sizes, minimum lot size and maximum lot size: Lot sizes within the Project site would range from 15,272 square feet to 16,765 square feet. Source: Project Application Submittal Package. Attached(indicate whether units are rental or for sale units): Not Applicable. 21) Anticipated range of sale prices and/or rents: TBD TBD Sale Price(s) $ to$ Rent(per month) $ to$ 22) Specify number of bedrooms by unit type: 3 Residential Plan Types: Plan 1 - Spanish: Single Story, 3 or 4 BR; Two-Story, 5 BR Plan 2- Farmhouse: Single Story, 3 or 4 BR; Two-Story, 5 BR Plan 3- California Ranch: Single Story, 3 or 4 BR; Two-Story, 5 BR 23) Indicate anticipated household size by unit type: 3.03 persons per DU Source: http://www.dof.ca.gov/Forecasting/Demographics/Estimates/E-5/. 24) Indicate the expected number of school children who will be residing within the project: Contact the appropriate School Districts as shown in Attachment B: 6 a. Elementary: 4 b. Junior High: 4 c. Senior High COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, AND INSTITUTIONAL PROJECTS 25) Describe type of use(s)and major function(s)of commercial, industrial or institutional uses: Not Applicable. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 6 of 10 26) Total floor area of commercial, industrial, or institutional uses by type: Not Applicable. 27) Indicate hours of operation: Not Applicable. 28) Number of employees: Total:Not Applicable. Maximum Shift: Time of Maximum Shift: 29) Provide breakdown of anticipated job classifications,including wage and salary ranges,as well as an indication of the rate of hire for each classification (attach additional sheet if necessary): Not Applicable. 30) Estimation of the number of workers to be hired that currently reside in the City: Not Applicable. *31) For commercial and industrial uses only, indicate the source, type, and amount of air pollution emissions. (Data should be verified through the South Coast Air Quality Management District, at(818) 572-6283): Not Applicable. ALL PROJECTS 32) Have the water,sewer,fire,and flood control agencies serving the project been contacted to determine their ability to provide adequate service to the proposed project? If so,please indicate their response. A water and sewer service "will-serve" letter from the Cucamonga Valley Water District(CVWD) is provided at Initial Study Appendix H. Fire and flood control agencies will be contacted through the City CEQA review process and Project design review processes. The Project will comply with all agency(ies) requirements. As substantiated in the attached Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, the Project would not result in significant impacts affecting water, sewer, fire protection, or flood control facilities, or related service providers. Please refer also to Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form, Items 10 and 15. Updated 4/11/2013 Page 7 of 10 33) In the known history of this property, has there been any use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials? Examples of hazardous and/or toxic materials include, but are not limited to PCBs;radioactive substances;pesticides and herbicides;fuels, oils,solvents,and other flammable liquids and gases. Also note underground storage of any of the above. Please list the materials and describe their use, storage, and/or discharge on the property, as well as the dates of use, if known. Phase I ESA and Limited Phase II ESA(collectively ESAs) have been completed for the Project. The ESAs concluded that the Project site is not significantly affected by hazards or hazardous conditions including but noill limited to use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials. Please also refer to Environmental Checklist Form, Item 9. Source: Phase I ESA and Limited Phase 11 ESA(IS/MND Appendix G). 34) Will the proposed project involve the temporary or long-term use, storage, or discharge of hazardous and/or toxic materials, including but not limited to those examples listed above?If yes, provide an inventory of all such materials to be used and proposed method of disposal. The location of such uses, along with the storage and shipment areas, shall be shown and labeled on the application plans. No. Please also refer to Environmental Checklist Form, Item 9. 35) The applicant shall be required to pay any applicable Fish and Game fee. The project planner will confirm which fees apply to this project.All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission/Planning Director hearing: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for adequate evaluation of this project to the best of my ability,that the facts,statements,and information presented are true and correct tot he best of my knowledge and belief. I further understand that additional information may be required to be submitted before an adequate evaluation can be made by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Date: Signature: Title: Updated 4/11/2013 Page 8 of 10 ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ESTIMATED WATER USE AND SEWER FLOWS FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT (Data Provided by Cucamonga Valley Water District February 2003) Water Usage Single-Family 705 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 256 gallons per EDU per day Neighborhood Commercial 1000 gal/day/unit (tenant) General Commercial 4082 gal/day/unit (tenant) Office Professional 973 gal/day/unit (tenant) Institutional/Government 6412 gal/day/unit (tenant) Industrial Park 1750 gal/day/unit (tenant) Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/unit (tenant) Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/unit (tenant) Sewer Flows Single-Family 270 gallons per EDU per day Multi-Family 190 gallons per EDU per day General Commercial 1900 gal/day/acre Office Professional 1900 gal/day/acre Institutional/Government Industrial Park 3000 gal/day/acre Large General Industrial 2020 gal/day/acre Heavy Industrial (distribution) 1863 gal/day/acre Source: Cucamonga Valley Water District Engineering & Water Resources Departments, Urban Water Management Plan 2000 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 9 of 10 ATTACHMENT B Contact the school district for your area for amount and payment of school fees: Elementary School Districts Alta Loma 9350 Base Line Road, Suite F Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-0766 Central 10601 Church Street, Suite 112 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)989-8541 Cucamonga 8776 Archibald Avenue Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)987-8942 Etiwanda 6061 East Avenue P.O. Box 248 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 (909)899-2451 High School Chaffey High School 211 West 5th Street Ontario, CA 91762 (909)988-8511 Updated 4/11/2013 Page 10 of 10 Part II : Environmental Checklist Form City of Rancho Cucamonga ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM INITIAL STUDY PART II BACKGROUND 1. Project File: East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) 2. Related Files: DRC2020-00139, DRC2020-00140, DRC2020-00141 3. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to, later phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary): Please refer to IS/MND Preface. 4. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: Craig Kozma,Manning Homes, 20151 SW Birch Street, Suite 150,Newport Beach, CA 92660 5. General Plan Designation: VLR: Very Low Residential (0.1 —2.0 DU/AC) 6. Zoning: Etiwanda Specific Plan: Very Low Residential (up to 2.0 DU/AC) 7. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting (Briefly describe the project's surroundings): Please refer to IS/MND Preface. 8. Lead Agency Name and Address: Tabe Van der Zwaag City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909)477-2750 Ext. 4311 9. Contact Person and Phone Number: Craig Kozma, Manning Homes, (949) 250-4200 10. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): GLOSSARY—The following technical/agency abbreviations are used in this report: CVWD—Cucamonga Valley Water District EIR—Environmental Impact Report NPDES—National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NOx—Nitrogen Oxides ROG—Reactive Organic Gases (also referred to as Volatile Organic Compounds [VOC]) PM2.5—Fine Particulate Matter Less than 2.5 Microns in Diameter Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 2 PMio—Fine Particulate Matter Less than 10 Microns in Diameter RWQCB —Regional Water Quality Control Board SCAQMD— South Coast Air Quality Management District SWPPP—Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan WQMP—Water Quality Management Plan ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. O Aesthetics ()Agriculture/Forestry (✓)Air Quality Resources (✓)Biological Resources (✓) Cultural Resources ( ) Energy (✓)Geology/Soils ( ) Greenhouse Gas Emissions ()Hazards and Hazardous Materials ( ) Hydrology/Water Quality () Land Use/Planning ( ) Mineral Resources O Noise Population/Housing O Public Services (✓) ( ) Transportation/Traffic Recreation OTribal Cultural Resources O Utilities/Service Systems O Wildfire (`/) Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: ( ) I End that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. (✓) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by, or agreed to, by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. O I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. O I find that the proposed project MAY have a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standard and 2)has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 3 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentiallyan with Than pp g Significant Mitigation Significant No Imnacl Incomoralcd Jmnact Imnact described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects I) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared By: Date: Reviewed $y. ———————————————— Date: Lead Agwcy a �� ,� ��� Date: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 4 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. AESTHETICS.Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: O O (✓) () a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not O O O (✓� limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State Scenic Highway? c) In nonurbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing O O (✓) () visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which O O (✓) ( ) would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga sits at the southern base of the San Gabriel Mountains. Mountain views are available from most areas in the City and provide a scenic backdrop for the community. Area roadways provide unobstructed views of the San Gabriel Mountains to the north and, from the foothills, of the lower- lying valley to the south. The Project site is not located within a designated view corridor as identified at General Plan Figure LU-6. As illustrated on Figure 1.3-1, Existing Land Uses, the Project represents the visually compatible continuation of existing residential land uses, and would not impede views of, or otherwise substantively affect scenic vistas or access to scenic vistas. The General Plan EIR also recognizes other scenic resources, including remaining stands of eucalyptus windrows, scattered vineyards and orchards, and natural vegetation in flood-control channels and utility corridors. As part of the Project technical analyses, an arborist report and tree inventory (collectively, Project Arborist Report) was prepared to evaluate the quality and viability of trees that could be potentially affected by development of the Project. The Project Arborist Report (On-Site Tree Inspection and Inventory Follow-up Report, Tentative Tract 20334; East Avenue, North of Blue Gum, Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 5 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Etiwanda [City of Rancho Cucamonga], CA (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist #496) March 2, 2021 [Revised]) is presented at IS/MND Appendix A. The predominance of the existing trees within the Project site are dead, stumps, or are in a state of terminal decline (Project Arborist Report, pp. 1 — 3). These trees would be removed during site preparation activities. Additionally, as part of the Project, the degraded eucalyptus windrow along the Project site southerly boundary would be replaced/replanted with new trees within a minimum 15-foot-wide landscape buffer area. Project trees would be replaced consistent with the City Development Code Chapter 17.80 Tree Preservation. See also: http://qcode.us/codes/ranchocucamonga/view.php?to]2ic=17-iv-17 80&frames=on. The Project does not propose or require uses or facilities that would adversely affect vineyards, orchards, natural vegetation, or other City scenic resources. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista is less-than-significant. b) No Impact. There are no scenic highways in or near the City, which may be affected by future development and redevelopment (General Plan EIR, p. 1-7). As such, the Project would have no impact on scenic resources within a State Scenic Highway. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project is located in an urbanized area. Development of the Project site with single-family residential uses is anticipated under and allowed by the City General Plan. The Project would implement contemporary single-family residential designs representing an appropriate and compatible continuation of existing residential uses. Subject to City review and approval, final design concepts for the Project would be required to conform to applicable standards and regulations established under the Etiwanda Specific Plan (City of Rancho Cucamonga) 1983 and subsequent amendments (Specific Plan); Specific Plan Chapter 5, Standards &Regulations. See also: hgps://www.dropbox.com/sh/h2zdp ly2ic7inus/AABulrjmOiZas4OaFJrfRh7a?d1=0&pr eview=Etiwanda+Specific+Plan.pdf. The Project would be required to comply with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan and City Development Code Standards (Development Code Chapter 17.34, General Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 6 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Development Standards; Chapter 17.36,Development Standards by Base Zoning District. See also: htip://gcode.us/codes/ranchocucamonga/view.php?topic=17&frames=on. Compliance with the applicable provisions of the Specific Plan and Development Code would ensure that the Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to substantially degrade the existing visual character and quality of the site and its surroundings is less-than-significant. d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would introduce new sources of lighting, including streetlights and security lighting. Subject to City review and approval, all Project lighting would be required to conform to regulations, guidelines, and standards established under the City Development Code (Development Code Chapter 17.58, Outdoor Lighting Standards). General lighting requirements applicable to all outdoor lighting, excerpted from the City Development Code, is presented below: 17.58.050 General lighting requirements. The requirements listed below shall apply to all outdoor lighting. A. Nuisance prevention. All outdoor lighting shall be designed, located, installed, directed downward or toward structures, fully shielded, and maintained in order to prevent glare, light trespass, and light pollution. B. Maintenance. Fixtures and lighting shall be maintained in good working order and in a manner that serves the original design intent. 1. Burnt-out and broken light bulbs shall be replaced. 2. Lighting fixtures shall remain free of graffiti and rust. 3. Painted light fixtures shall be maintained to minimize chipping or peeling. C. Shielding. Except as otherwise exempt, all outdoor lighting shall be recessed and/or constructed with full downward shielding in order to reduce light and glare impacts on trespass to adjoining properties and public rights-of-way. Each fixture shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public rights-of-way, so that no light fixture directly illuminates an area outside of the project site intended to be illuminated. See Figure 17.58.050-2 (Shielding and Maximum Height of Freestanding Outdoor Light Fixtures). D. Level of illumination. Outdoor lighting shall be designed to illuminate at the minimum level necessary for safety and security and to avoid the harsh contrasts in Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 7 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact lighting levels between the project site and adjacent properties. Illumination requirements are provided in Table 17.58.050-1 (Illumination Requirements). TABLE 17.58.050-1 ILLUMINATION REQUIREMENTS Category Where Measured Required Illumination Notes (minimum or maximum) Permitted to be fully illuminated during hours of operation.After hours,may Public,civic,and religious be dimmed or turned off buildings such that only lighting essential to security or safety shall be maintained. General Parking lots,driveways, Within 2-foot radius of 1.0 foot-candle(minimum) trash enclosures,public object edge and 4.0 foot-candle At all hours phones,group mailboxes (maximum) Parking lots for banks, At point of highest and 1.5 foot-candle(minimum) convenience stores,check and 4.0 foot-candle During operating hours cashing businesses lowest light level (maximum) Center of walkway at point 0.5 foot-candle(minimum) Only applies to walkways Pedestrian walkways of highest and lowest light and 2.0 foot-candle intended for use after dark level (maximum) Nonresidential structures, 5-foot radius of door(each 1.0 foot-candle(minimum) During hours of darkness entryways,and doors side) Adjacent residential At structure and rear Equivalent to moon's property setback line 0.1 foot-candle(maximum) potential ambient illumination E. Signs. Lighting of signs shall be in compliance with chapter 17.74 (Sign Regulations for Private Property). F. Sports fields/outdoor activity areas. Where playing fields or other specialty activity areas are to be illuminated, lighting fixtures shall be mounted, aimed, and shielded so that the light falls within the primary playing area and no significant off-site light trespass is produced. Additionally, the lights shall be turned off within one hour after the end of the event. G. Wireless telecommunication facilities. Wireless telecommunication facilities and related equipment shall be unlit except as provided in chapter 17.106 (Wireless Communicator Facilities). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 8 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact H. Maximum height of freestanding outdoor light fixtures. The maximum height of outdoor light fixtures on residential properties shall be 12 feet. The maximum height of freestanding outdoor light fixtures abutting residential development shall be 15 feet. Otherwise, the maximum height for freestanding outdoor light structures shall be 20 feet. Height shall be measured from the finish grade, inclusive of the pedestal, to the top of the fixture. See Figure 17.58.050-2 (Shielding and Maximum Height of Freestanding Outdoor Light Fixtures). Height limit for light fixtures in industrial areas is 25 feet. The height of all outdoor light fixtures is measured from ground level to top of illumination fixture and does not include decorative elements attached to the top of the fixture. See also: http://gcode.us/codes/ranchocucamonga/view.php?topic=l7-iv- 17 58&frames=on Compliance with applicable provisions of the Development Code ensures that the Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area is less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; On-Site Tree Inspection and Inventory Follow-up Report, Tentative Tract 20334; East Avenue, North of Blue Gum, Etiwanda [City of Rancho Cucamonga], CA (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist #496) March 2, 2021 (Revised); City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; Etiwanda Specific Plan; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 9 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 2. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland,Unique Farmland,or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a O O O (✓) Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, O O O (✓) forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220 (g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production(as defined by Government Code Section 51104 (g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land O O O (✓) to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, O O O (✓) due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Comments: a, c) No Impact. The Project site is not designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Nor is the Project site zoned for forest lands, timberlands, or timberland production. The Project would have no effect on farmlands, forest lands or timberlands. See also: https://mgps.conservation.ca. og v/dlrp/ciff/. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 10 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact b) No Impact. No Williamson Act contracts are in place for the subject site. The Project would therefore not conflict with any existing agricultural zoning designations, nor affect any existing Williamson Act contract(s). d) No Impact. There are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land or timberland. Further, there are no areas within the City that are zoned as forest land, timberland, or Timberland Production. Therefore, no impacts would occur related to the loss or conversion of forest land to non-forest use, or timberland production. e) No Impact. There are no agricultural uses, forestlands or timberlands on the site. The Project does not involve other changes to the environment which could result in the conversion of farmland or forest land to other uses. Furthermore, there are no lands within the City of Rancho Cucamonga that qualify as forest land. Therefore, there is no potential for conversion of forest land to a non-forest use. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management district or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any O (✓) O () criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant O (✓) O ( ) concentrations? d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) O O (✓) () adversely affecting a substantial number of people? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 11 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: Potential air quality impacts of the Project are evaluated and substantiated in detail in Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 1, 2020 (Revised February 24, 2021) (Project AQIA/GHGA). The latest SCAQMD/California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA)-approved version of the California Emissions Estimator Model (CaIEEMod, v2016.3.2) was utilized to estimate Project-related air pollutant emissions levels. Project emissions levels were then compared to applicable SCAQMD thresholds in order to determine if air quality standards would be violated; or if Project emissions would contribute substantially to existing or projected air quality violations. Unless otherwise noted, CaIEEMod default values and assumptions are applied throughout. Analysis, results, and conclusions of the Project AQIA/GHGA provide the basis for the following discussions. The Project AQIA/GHGA in its entirety is provided at IS/MND Appendix B. To aid in the review of discussions presented subsequently in this Section, recurring terms, abbreviations, and acronyms are defined as follows: PPM - Parts per Million; µg/m3 - Micrograms Per Cubic Meter; PMIo - Particulate Matter Less Than 10 Microns In Diameter; PM2.5 -Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Microns In Diameter. a) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which is characterized by relatively poor air quality. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over an approximately 10,743-square-mile area consisting of the four-county SCAB and the Los Angeles County and Riverside County portions of what used to be referred to as the Southeast Desert Air Basin. In these areas, the SCAQMD is principally responsible for air pollution control, and works directly with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), county transportation commissions, and local governments, as well as state and federal agencies, to reduce emissions from stationary, mobile, and indirect sources to meet state and federal ambient air quality standards. The SCAQMD has adopted Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs) outlining strategies to achieve state and federal ambient air quality standards. AQMPs are periodically updated to reflect technological advances, recognize new or pending regulations, more Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 12 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact effectively reduce emissions, accommodate growth, and minimize any negative fiscal impacts of air pollution control on the economy. In March 2017, the SCAQMD released the Final 2016 AQMP (2016 AQMP). The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2016 — 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016 — 2040 RTP/SCS) and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. Air quality conditions and trends presented in the 2016 AQMP assume that regional development will occur in accordance with population growth projections identified by SCAG in the 2016—2040 RTP/SCS. The SCAG 2016 — 2040 RTP/SCS in turn derives its assumptions, in part, from general plans of cities located within the SCAG region. Accordingly, if a project is consistent with the development and growth projections reflected in the adopted general plan, it would be consistent with the growth assumptions in the SCAG 2016 — 2040 RTP/SCS and 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP further assumes that development projects within the region will implement appropriate strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions, thereby promoting timely implementation of the AQMP. Criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are identified at Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (1993). AQMP consistency criteria are listed below. Project consistency with, and support of these criteria is presented subsequently. • Criterion No. 1: The project under consideration will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. • Criterion No. 2: The project under consideration will not exceed the assumptions in the AQMP based on the years of Project build-out phase. Criterion No. 1: The violations that Criterion No. 1 refers to are the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if Localized Significance Thresholds Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 13 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact (LSTs) or regional significance thresholds were exceeded. As mitigated, Project construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable LSTs or regional significance thresholds. See following discussion at Item 3 b)under the heading"Localized Impacts." Without mitigation, Project operational-source emissions would not exceed applicable LSTs or regional significance thresholds. See following discussion at Item 3 b) under the heading "Localized Impacts." Further, the Project would implement applicable Best Available Control Measures (BACMs), and would comply with applicable SCAQMD rules, acting to further reduce potential air quality impacts. On this basis, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, or cause or contribute to new violations. Criterion No. 2: Criterion No. 2 addresses consistency of a given project with approved local and regional land use plans and associated potential AQMP implications. That is, AQMP emissions models and emissions control strategies are based in part on land use data provided by local general plan documentation; and regional plans, which reflect and incorporate local general plan information. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the analyses conducted for any given project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. Projects that propose general plan amendments may increase the intensity of use and/or result in higher traffic volumes, thereby resulting in increased operational-source emissions (stationary and vehicular-sources) when compared to the AQMP assumptions. However, if a given project is consistent with and does not otherwise exceed the growth projections in the applicable local general plan, then that project would be considered consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP. General Plan Consistency Residential uses proposed by the Project are allowed under the site's current General Plan Land Use designation of Residential — Very Low (0.1 — 2.0 Dwelling Units/Acre [DU/AC]). No General Plan Amendment (GPA) is required in conjunction with the Project. The Project would not result in growth or development not anticipated under the AQMP. Project operational-source emissions are reflected in the AQMP assumptions, and would not result in AQMP inconsistencies. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 14 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Regional Plan Consistency Development of the City pursuant to the General Plan is reflected in Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) planning efforts and policies including: The 2016— 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCAG) April 2016 (2016 — 2040 RTPSC). The Project is consistent with the General Plan and by extension is reflected in SCAG planning efforts and policies. The "Final 2008 Regional Comprehensive Plan" (2008 RCP) defines a vision for the SCAG region to be implemented under a strategic plan addressing the regions interrelated housing, traffic, water and air quality issues. The 2008 RCP does not mandate planning actions. SCAG does however request that local governments consider the 2008 RCP recommendations in developing or amending local plans, codes, design guidelines, and other related actions. SCAG promotes use of the 2008 RCP as an advisory policy document for voluntary use by local agencies. The Project does not propose or require actions that would somehow conflict with 2008 RCP advisory policies. AOMP Consistency Conclusion As mitigated, Project construction-source emissions would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds. Unmitigated Project operational-source emissions would not exceed any applicable regional or local thresholds. The Project would not result in or cause NAAQS or CAAQS violations. The Project does not propose or require amendment of the City General Plan, and the Project land uses are reflected in the AQMP. The Project is consistent with and reflected in applicable regional planning efforts. On this basis, the Project is considered to be consistent with the AQMP. The potential for the Project to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP is therefore less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Attainment Status Designations for San Bernardino County and the Project area are summarized at Table 3-1. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 15 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 3-1 Attainment Status Designations for San Bernardino Count Pollutant National Ambient Air Quality California Ambient Air Quality Standard Standard Attainment(I-hour)' Nonattainment(I-hour)classification' Ozone Nonattainment(8-hour)3 classification= extreme Nonattainment(8-hour) Nonattainment(8-hour)'classification= extreme Nonattainment(8-hour)5 classification= extreme Nonattainment(24-hour) Respirable particulate matter Attainment(24-hour) (PM10) Nonattainment(annual) Nonattainment(24-hour) No state standard for 24-hour p Fine articulate matter Fine pa) Nonattainment(annual) Nonattainment(annual) Attainment(I-hour) Attainment(I-hour) Carbon monoxide(CO) Attainment(8-hour) Attainment(8-hour) Unclassified/attainment(I-hour) Attainment(I-hour) Nitrogen dioxide(NO2) Unclassified/attainment(annual) Attainment(annual) Attainment(I-hour) Sulfur dioxide(SO2)1 (Attainment)(I-hour) Attainment(24-hour) Lead(particulate) Attainment(3-month rolling average) Attainment(30-day average) Hydrogen sulfide Unclassified(I-hour) No federal standard Sulfates Attainment(24-hour) Visibility-reducing particles Unclassified(8-hour) Vinyl chloride Unclassified(24-hour) Notes: 'Air quality meets federal 1-hour ozone standard(77 Federal Register 64036). The U.S.Environmental Protection Agency revoked this standard, but some associated requirements still apply. 'Per Health and Safety Code Section 40921.5(c),the classification is based on 1989-1991 data and therefore does not change. 3 1997 standard. °2008 standard. 5 2015 standard. 6 2010 standard.Source:SCAQMD 2016 as cited in City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update,Air Quality Existing Conditions Report, May 2020. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 16 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Per SCAQMD significance guidance, less-than-significant non-attainment impacts at the Project level are not cumulatively considerable, and would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s) for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Conversely, significant non-attainment impacts at the Project level are cumulatively considerable, and would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of criteria pollutant(s) for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. Regional Impacts Construction-Source Air Pollutant Emissions Project construction activities (e.g., site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, architectural coating, infrastructure construction) would generate emissions of CO, ROG, NOx, SOx, PMio, and PM2.5. Please refer to the Project AQIA/GHGA for details regarding equipment use, construction timeframes and other CalEEMod inputs and related construction-source emissions modeling. SCAQMD regional thresholds for construction-source emissions are presented at Table 3-2. Project construction-source emissions in the context of SCAQMD regional thresholds are presented at Table 3-3. Table 3-2 SCAQMD Regional Thresholds Construction-Source Emissions Pollutant Threshold NOx 100 lbs./day VOC 75 lbs./day PM10 150 lbs./day PM2.5 55 lbs./day SOX 150 lbs./day CO 550 lbs./day Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga(Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 17 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Beyond applicable SCAQMD Rule 403 minimums, the Project AQIA construction- source air quality modeling reflected at Table 3-3 assumes watering of unstabilized disturbed areas three time per day (daily 3x watering) during grading activities. Daily 3x watering is a SCAQMD Rule 403-specified requirement for Large Operations (50 or more acres). The Project site comprises approximately 10 acres and is not a Large Operation as defined under Rule 403. Since daily 3x watering is not a Rule 403 requirement for the Project, it is appropriate to include daily 3x watering as mitigation. Mandated daily 3x watering is included herein as Mitigation Measure AQ-1. AQ-1: During grading activities, unstabilized disturbed areas shall be watered a minimum of three times per day. As indicated at Table 3-3, with implementation of mitigation, Project construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds. The potential for Project construction-source emissions to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard would therefore be less-than- significant, as mitigated. Table 3-3 Maximum Daily Construction-Source Emissions (pounds per day) ROG NOx CO Sox PM 10 PM2.5 Site Preparation 4.2 42.5 22.2 0.0 9.4 5.9 Grading 4.5 50.3 32.7 0.1 5.8 3.5 Building Construction 2.3 20.4 18.3 0.0 1.5 1.2 Paving 1.3 11.2 15.0 0.0 0.7 0.6 Architectural Coating 10.4 1.4 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Maximum Daily Emissions 10.4 50.3 32.7 0.1 9.4 5.9 SCAQMD Regional 75 100 550 150 150 SS Threshold Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes,City of Rancho Cucamonga(Greve &Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Notes:Modeling reflects 3x daily watering during grading activities. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 18 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Operational-Source Air Pollutant Emissions Project operations (e.g., vehicle trips, landscaping, on-going site/building maintenance) would generate emissions of CO, ROG, NOx, SOx, PM1o, and PM2.5. Please refer to the Project AQIA/GHGA for details regarding trip generation, landscaping, maintenance timeframes and other CalEEMod inputs and related operational-source emissions modeling. SCAQMD Regional Thresholds for operational-source emissions are presented at Table 3-4. Table 3-4 SCAQMD Regional Thresholds Operational-Source Emissions Pollutant Threshold NOx 55 lbs./day VOC 55 lbs./day PMI0 150 lbs./day PM2.5 55 lbs./day SOX 150 lbs./day CO 550 lbs./day Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga(Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Project operational-source emissions in the context of SCAQMD regional thresholds are presented at Table 3-5. As summarized at Table 3-5, Project operational-source emissions would not exceed SCAQMD regional thresholds. The potential for Project operational- source air pollutant emissions to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard is less-than-significant. Table 3-5 Maximum Dail O erational-Source Emissions (pounds per day) ROG NOx CO Sox PMI0 PM2.5 Total Project Emissions 1.1 2.0 5.4 0.0 1.3 0.4 SCAQMD Regional 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Threshold Exceeded? No No No No No No Source: Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 19 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Localized Impacts Localized Significance Threshold Analysis The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the national and/or state ambient air quality standards (NAAQS/CAAQS). Collectively, the NAAQS/CAAQS establish Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs). LSTs were developed in response to the SCAQMD Governing Board's Environmental Justice Initiative I-4. More specifically, to address potential Environmental Justice implications of localized air pollutant impacts, the SCAQMD adopted LSTs indicating whether a project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. LSTs represent the maximum emissions from a project that will not cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent applicable national or state ambient air quality standard. Use of LSTs by local government is voluntary. Lead agencies may employ LSTs as another indicator of significance in air quality impact analyses. Emissions Considered/Methodology LSTs apply to carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), particulate matter less than 10 microns (PMio), and particulate matter less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). The Project LST analysis incorporates, and is consistent with, protocols and procedures established by the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (Methodology). The Methodology clearly states that "off-site mobile emissions from the Project should NOT be included in the emissions compared to LSTs." Therefore, for purposes of the LST analysis, only "on-site" emissions were considered. See also: http:Hagmd. og v/cega/handbook/LST/LST.html. LST Analysis The LST mass rate look-up tables provided by the SCAQMD were employed to determine if Project construction-source or operational-source air pollutant emissions could result in significant localized air quality impacts. If the calculated on-site construction-source or operational-source air pollutant emissions do not exceed the LST mass rate look-up table levels then localized emission impacts would be less-than- significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 20 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The Methodology presents mass emission rate thresholds for each Source Receptor Area (SRA); and for projects of 1, 2, and 5 acres, with nearest receptor distances of 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters. For intermediary areas and receptor distances, the Methodology employs linear interpolation to determine applicable mass emission rate thresholds. If receptors are within 25 meters of the subject development site, the Methodology employs the 25-meter distance threshold. The Project is located in SRA 32. The nearest existing sensitive land uses are the residences located northerly and westerly adjacent of the Project site. Localized Construction-Source Emissions Peak daily localized construction-source emissions received at the nearest receptors is summarized at Table 3-6. Applicable SCAQMD LSTs are also presented. The modeling of localized construction-source emissions presented at Table 3-6 assumes 3x daily watering stipulated under previous Mitigation Measure AQ-1. As indicated, with application of mitigation, Project localized construction-source emissions would not exceed applicable LSTs. Project localized construction-source emissions impacts would therefore be less-than-significant as mitigated. Table 3-6 Maximum Construction-Source Localized Emissions Pollutant NOX CO PMio PM2.5 Peak Daily Total 50.2 32.0 9.2 5.9 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 2,193 16 9 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Operational-Source Emissions LST Analysis LST analyses appropriately consider only emissions generated by on-site sources. In this regard, the Project operational-source emissions LST analysis evaluates emissions that would be generated by on-site stationary/area-sources and also captures emissions that would be generated by on-site traffic. Table 3-7 presents the Project's maximum potential localized operational-source emissions. Applicable SCAQMD localized significance thresholds are also presented. As indicated, Project operational-source air pollutant Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 21 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact emissions would not exceed applicable SCAQMD LSTs and would therefore be less- than-significant. Table 3-7 Maximum Operational-Source Localized Emissions Summary (pounds per day) Pollutant NOX CO PM10 PM2.5 On-site Emissions 0.4 1.6 0.04 0.04 SCAQMD Localized Threshold 270 2,193 4 2 Threshold Exceeded? No No No No Source: Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga(Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Localized Diesel Particulate Matter(DPM)Emissions Impacts In 1998, the California Air Resources Board (ARB) identified particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines (Diesel Particulate Matter or DPM) as a Toxic Air Contaminant JAC). In California, diesel engine exhaust has been identified as a carcinogen. It is assumed that the majority of the heavy construction equipment utilized during Project construction would be diesel-fueled and would generate DPM emissions. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook(1993) recommends significance thresholds for new TAC sources. Under the recommended threshold TACs resulting in an increased carcinogenic risk of greater than 10 incidents per million population would be considered potentially significant. The cancer risk is determined by multiplying the Dose with the Cancer Risk Potency Factor. The Cancer Risk Potency Factor describes the potential risk of developing cancer per unit of average daily dose over a 70-year lifetime. There is no recommendation or requirement by the SCAQMD to evaluate the cancer risk for small- scale infill residential development such as that proposed by the East Avenue Residential Project. Cancer risk impacts of TACs are related to cumulative exposure, and are assessed over a 70-year exposure period. Cancer risk is expressed as the maximum number of new cases of cancer projected to occur in a population of one million people due to exposure to the cancer-causing substance over a 70-year lifetime (California Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, A Guide to Health Risk Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 22 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Assessment). Grading for the Project, when the peak diesel exhaust emissions would be generated, would occur over a period of less than 3 months; and all Project construction would be completed in less than 2 years. Because of the relatively short duration of Project construction and generation of construction-source DMP emissions compared to a 70-year exposure scenario, Project construction activities would not generate or result in diesel emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The Project would implement conventional single-family residential uses, and does not propose or require uses or activities that would generate substantial operational-source DPM emissions. Project operations would therefore not generate or result in diesel emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. c) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Sensitive receptors can include uses such as long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, and retirement homes. Residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive receptors. As concluded in the above discussion of Localized Air Quality Impacts, with the implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, the sensitive receptors nearest the Project site would not be subject to emissions exceeding SCAQMD LSTs. Nor would Project construction or operations otherwise generate emissions that would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. On this basis, the potential for the Project to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations is less-than- significant as mitigated. d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Temporary, short-term odor releases are potentially associated with Project construction activities. Potential odor sources include, but are not limited to: asphalt/paving materials, glues, paint, and other architectural coatings. It is expected that any associated odors would quickly dissipate and would not adversely affect vicinity properties. Conventional residential uses, such as those proposed by the Project, are not typically associated with long-term objectionable odors. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people is less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 23 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Sources: Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 1, 2020 (Revised February 24, 2021); SCAQMD LST Methodology: http://agmd. og v/ccga/handbook/LST/LST.html; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through O (✓) O () habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or O O (✓) () other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally O O (✓) () protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native O O (✓) resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting O O (✓) O biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat O O O (✓) Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 24 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: Potential biological resources impacts of the Project are evaluated and substantiated in detail in: • Habitat and Jurisdictional Assessment for the Proposed Residential Development Located within Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0225-191-17 and 0225-191-09 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (ELMT Consulting) March 3, 2021 (Project Biological Resources Assessment, IS/MND Appendix C); and • On-Site Tree Inspection and Inventory Follow-up Report, Tentative Tract 20334; East Avenue, North of Blue Gum, Etiwanda [City of Rancho Cucamonga], CA (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist #496) March 2, 2021 (Revised) (Project Arborist Report, IS/MND Appendix A). Analysis, results and conclusions of the above-referenced studies provide the basis for the following discussions. a) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. Methodology A literature review and records search were conducted to determine which special-status biological resources have the potential to occur on or within the general vicinity of the Project site. Literature/records reviewed included a query of the CDFW's QuickView Tool in the Biogeographic Information and Observation System (BIOS), CNDDB Rarefind 5, the California Native Plant Society's (CNPS) Electronic Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California, Calflora Database, compendia of special- status species published by CDFW, and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) species listings. All available reports, survey results, and literature detailing the biological resources previously observed on or within the vicinity of the project site were reviewed to understand existing site conditions and note the extent of any disturbances that have occurred within the project site that would otherwise limit the distribution of special- status biological resources. Standard field guides and texts were reviewed for specific habitat requirements of special-status and non-special-status biological resources, as well as the following resources: Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 25 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact • Google Earth Pro historic aerial imagery(1994-2018); • United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS), Soil Survey; • USFWS National Wetland Inventory; • USFWS Critical Habitat designations for Threatened and Endangered Species; and • USFWS Endangered Species Profiles. The literature review provided a baseline from which to inventory the biological resources potentially occurring within the project site. The CNDDB database was used, in conjunction with ArcGIS software, to locate the nearest recorded occurrences of special- status species and determine the distance from the project site. In addition to theliterature review, a general habitat assessment or field investigation of the project site was conducted to document existing conditions and assess the potential for special-status biological resources to occur within the Project site. Following the literature/records review, inventories and evaluations of biological resources within the Project were conducted. Field surveys of the Project site were conducted on January 23, 2020 and October 29, 2020. Plant communities and land cover types identified on aerial photographs during the literature review were verified by walking meandering transects throughout the Project site. In addition, aerial photography was reviewed prior to the site investigation to locate potential natural corridors and linkages that may support the movement of wildlife through the area. These areas identified on aerial photography were then walked during the field investigation. All plant and wildlife species observed, as well as dominant plant species within each plant community, were recorded. Plant species observed during the field investigation were identified by visual characteristics and morphology in the field. Unusual and less familiar plant species were photographed during the field investigation and identified in the laboratory using taxonomical guides. Wildlife detections were made through observation of scat, trails, tracks, burrows, nests, and/or visual and aural observation. In addition, site characteristics such as soil condition, topography, hydrology, anthropogenic disturbances, indicator species, condition of on-site plant communities and land cover Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 26 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact types, and presence of potential jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were noted. Vegetation Communities Three plant communities were observed within the Project site: non-native grassland (NNG); eucalyptus windrow; and a mature isolated strip of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) habitat along the easterly Project site boundary that has been invaded by eucalyptus trees creating a eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) forest. The noted eucalyptus forest runs through a historic drainage channel that once carried storm waters through the easterly portion of the Project site (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 5). The majority of the site supports a NNG plant community that has been subject to regular disturbances associated with historic agricultural activities and ongoing weed abatement activities. This NNG plant community is dominated by non-native grasses (i.e., Bromus) and other early successional ruderal/weedy plant species. Plant species observed within this plant community include brome (Bromus sp.), wild oat (Avena sp.), dwarf nettle (Urtica urens), horehound (Marrubium vulgare), tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca), short- podded mustard (Hirschfeldia incana), filaree (Erodium cicutarium), Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii), common phacelia (Phacelia distans), doveweed (Croton setiger), Jimson weed (Datura stramonium), wild cucumber (Marah macrocarpa), and golden crown beard (Verbesina enceliodes) (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 5). The northerly and southerly boundaries of the Project site are lined with eucalyptus windrows that are a remnant of the agricultural activities that dominated the site and surrounding area. These windrows are almost entirely composed of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.) with an understory composed primarily of nonnative weedy species such as Russian thistle and short-podded mustard. It is noted here that eucalyptus trees are a non-native species that can significantly impact native habitats, including RAFSS habitat (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 5). The easterly portion of the Project site (approximately 1.21 acres) supports an isolated patch of mature/degraded RAFSS habitat. This mature RAFSS habitat supports large woody plant species (trees and large shrubs) as the result of isolation from historic Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 27 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact scouring regimes associated with Etiwanda Creek. Dominant plant species include hollyleaf cherry (Prunus ilicifolia), California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), mountain mahogany (Cercocarpus betuloides) and basketbush (Rhus trilobata). Other species observed include scalebroom (Lepidospartum squamatum), pine goldenbush (Ericameria pinifolia), yerba santa (Eriodictyon californicum), short-podded mustard, filaree, and tree tobacco. As mentioned above, the mature RAFSS habitat in the easterly portion of the Project site has been degraded due to its isolation from storm flows from Etiwanda Creek. These storm flows are needed in order to periodically scour the native habitat, thereby maintaining its openness and viability. The maturing/senescing strip of RAFSS habitat in the easterly portion of the Project site has been further degraded by the invasion of eucalyptus trees into the main drainage channel that ran through the strip of habitat from north to south. Eucalyptus trees are deep rooted, causing the channelization of flood waters around their roots, creating deep narrow channels that funnel most of the water, eliminating sheet flooding that normally flows through RAFSS habitat. Without the scour associated with sheet flows, the vegetation in the RAFSS habitat becomes more dense and less available to RAFSS wildlife species, which prefer open habitat. As a result of the presence of the eucalyptus forest, the Project site no longer provides open and viable intermediate RAFSS habitat with long-term conservation value (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 5). Wildlife Communities This section provides a discussion of those wildlife species that were observed or are expected to occur within the Project site. Wildlife detections were based on calls, songs, scat, tracks, burrows, and direct observation. The project site provides limited habitat for wildlife species except those adapted to a high degree of anthropogenic disturbances and development. Fish No fish or hydrogeomorphic features (e.g., creeks, ponds, lakes, reservoirs) with frequent sources of water that would support populations of fish were observed on or within the vicinity of the Project site. Therefore, no fish are expected to occur and are presumed absent from the Project site (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 6). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 28 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Amphibians No amphibians were observed on or within the vicinity of the Project site. The drainage feature that runs along the easterly portion of the site has potential to provide foraging and cover habitat for amphibian species that can tolerate a high degree of anthropomorphic disturbance and infrequent water flows. Amphibian species that could be expected to occur include the Baja California tree frog (Pseudacris hypochondriaca hypochondriaca) (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 6). Reptiles During field investigations (January 23, 2020; updated October 29, 2020) the Great Basin fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis longipes) and the San Diego alligator lizard (Elgaria multicarinata webbii) were the only reptilian species observed onsite. Common reptilian species adapted to a high degree of anthropogenic disturbances that have the potential to occur on-site include western side-blotched lizard(Uta stansburiana elegans) and gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer annectens) (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 6). Birds The Project site provides foraging and cover habitat for a variety of bird species. Bird species detected during the field investigations include house finch (Haemorhouse mexicanus), California towhee (Melozone crissalis), lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), Say's phoebe (Sayornis saya), Cassin's kingbird (Tyrannus vociferans), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata), California scrub jay (Aphelocoma californica), western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), and mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 6). Mammals The Project site provides foraging and cover habitat for a variety of mammal species. The only mammal species observed during the field investigations were desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii) and Botta's pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae). Common mammalian species that could potentially occur on-site include coyote (Canis latrans), opossum (Didelphis virginiana), and raccoon (Procyon lotor) (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 6). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 29 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Nesting Birds The Project site was surveyed for the potential presence of nesting birds. Survey transects were conducted at 10-meter (approximately 33 feet). All transects were walked at a pace that allowed for careful/detailed observation. Methods to detect the presence of nesting birds included direct observation, aural detection, and signs of presence including pellets, whitewash, feathers, or prey remains. All trees, shrubs, and ground dwellings were searched for the possible presence of avian nests and thoroughly examine for signs of presence. Binoculars were used to observe distant birds and their activity around potential nesting habitat(Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 7). No active nests or birds displaying nesting behavior were observed during the field investigations. A remnant avian nest was observed in a eucalyptus tree in the middle of the southern portion of the Project site. While American crows and red-tailed hawks were observed onsite, no birds were observed interacting with the remnant nest or landed near it. The Project site and surrounding area provides foraging and nesting habitat for year- round and seasonal avian residents, as well as migrating songbirds that could occur in the area. The Project site has the potential to provide suitable nesting opportunities for birds that nest on the open ground and those acclimated to routine disturbances. In particular, the eucalyptus trees that border the Project site provide suitable nesting opportunities (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 7). Protected Species, Communities, and Habitat Special-Status Plant Species A total of 31 special-status plant species have been recorded in the Project vicinity. No special-status plant species were observed onsite during the habitat assessment. The majority of the Project site has been subject to anthropogenic disturbances from historic agricultural and weed abatement activities, and surrounding development. These disturbances have greatly reduced, if not eliminated, the suitability of the habitat onsite to support special-status plant species known to occur in the general vicinity of the Project site. Based on habitat requirements for special-status plant species and the absence of quality habitat needed by each species, it was determined that the Project site does not provide suitable habitat for any of the special-status plant species known to occur in the area. These species are presumed to be absent from the Project site. (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 8). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 30 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Special-Status Wildlife A total of 43 special-status wildlife species have been reported in the vicinity of the Project site. No special-status wildlife species were observed onsite during the habitat assessment. The majority of the Project site has been subject to onsite anthropogenic disturbances from historic agricultural and weed abatement activities. The Project site is also affected by general disturbance from surrounding development. These disturbances have greatly reduced, if not eliminated, the suitability of the habitat onsite to support special-status wildlife species. Based on habitat requirements for special-status wildlife species and the limited quantity and quality of on-site habitats, it was determined that the site has a moderate potential to support Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii), and a low potential to support western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus) and loggerhead shrike(Lanius ludovicianus).All remaining special-status wildlife species are presumed to be absent from the Project site due to lack of quality habitat (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 9). Other Wildlife Considerations Based on regional significance, the potential occurrence of burrowing owl and San Bernardino kangaroo rat within the Project site are provided below. Burrowing Owl The burrowing owl is currently listed as a California Species of Special Concern. It is a grassland specialist distributed throughout western North America where it occupies open areas with short vegetation and bare ground within shrub, desert, and grassland environments. Burrowing owls use a wide variety of and and semi-arid environments with well-drained, level to gently-sloping areas characterized by sparse vegetation and bare ground. Burrowing owls are dependent on the presence of available burrows created by burrowing mammals (such as ground squirrels), or where mammal burrows are scarce, burrowing owls have been found occupying man-made cavities, such as buried and non- functioning drainpipes, stand-pipes, and dry culverts. Burrowing owls also require open vegetation allowing line-of-sight observation of the surrounding habitat to forage as well as watch for predators (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 9). No burrowing owls or recent burrowing owl sign (e.g., pellets, feathers, castings, or whitewash) were observed during the field investigations. The Project site is unvegetated and/or vegetated with a variety of low-growing plant species that allow for line-of-sight Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 31 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact observation favored by burrowing owls. However, the Project site lacks suitable burrows (>4 inches in diameter) capable of providing roosting and nesting opportunities. Further, the eucalyptus trees that border the northerly and southerly boundaries of the Project site further decrease the likelihood that burrowing owls would occur on the site, as these features provide perching opportunities for larger raptor species (i.e., red-tailed hawk [Buteo jamaicensis]) that prey on burrowing owls (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 9). Based on the results of the field investigations, it was determined that the Project site does not provide suitable habitat for burrowing owls and focused surveys are not recommended (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p.10). San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat The San Bernardino kangaroo rat, federally listed as endangered, is one of several kangaroo rat species in its range. The Dulzura, the Pacific kangaroo rat (Dipodomys agilis) and the Stephens kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi) occur in areas occupied by the San Bernardino kangaroo rat, but these other species have a wider habitat range. San Bernardino kangaroo rat historically ranged from the San Bernardino Valley in San Bernardino County, to southwest Perris, Bautista Canyon, and Murrieta Hot Springs in Riverside County, with at least 25 separate localities identified. Currently, populations of the San Bernardino kangaroo rat are limited to seven widely separated locations in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, four of which (City Creek, Etiwanda, Reche Canyon, and South Bloomington) support only small, remnant populations. The Santa Ana River, Lytle and Cajon washes, and the San Jacinto River support the largest extant concentrations of San Bernardino kangaroo rat and the largest areas of habitat for this species (approximately 3,200 acres total). The total area of occupied habitat occurs across a mosaic of approximately 13,697 acres of potential habitat; however, all but the 3,215 occupied areas are currently more mature than the open, early successional habitat types preferred by the San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Project Biological Resources Assessment, P. 10). San Bernardino kangaroo rat is found primarily on sandy and loamy sand substrates, where they can readily excavate simple, shallow burrows. This is typically associated with RAFSS habitats, a relatively uncommon desert-influenced plant community in southern California that develops on alluvial fans and floodplains subjected to scouring Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 32 Less Than Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: potentially With Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact and deposition. Adjacent upland habitat provide refuge for San Bernardino kangaroo rat during flood events. Animals occupying this refugia habitat are able to repopulate core habitat areas within the floodplain following major flood events. Most of the drainages have been historically altered as a result of flood control efforts and the resulting increased use of river resources, including mining, off-road vehicle use, and road and housing development. This increased use of river resources has resulted in a reduction in both the amount and quality of habitat available for the San Bernardino kangaroo rat. The past habitat losses and potential future losses prompted the emergency listing of the San Bernardino kangaroo rat as an endangered species (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 10). Historically, the Project site has accommodated agriculture land uses (mainly orchards). However, the Project site is currently fallow. The Project site and surrounding areas are no longer exposed to fluvial processes needed to maintain the intermediate RAFSS habitat that would be required for long-term San Bernardino kangaroo rat conservation. An assessment of the existing 1.21 acres of RAFSS habit in the easterly portion of the Project site has been completed. The assessment determined that the plant cover from non-native grasses in this 1.21-acre area was too dense to support San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat. No San Bernardino kangaroo rat sign was found within the 1.21-acre area (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 10). The Project site has been historically isolated from the influences of Etiwanda Creek and the alluvial fans extending out of the San Gabriel Mountains. Due to the history of regular disruption and manipulation of the native soils, the loss of fluvial scouring due to flood control activities, and isolation from known occupied habitat, it was determined that the Project site does not provide suitable habitat for San Bernardino kangaroo rat. No further studies are recommended(Project Biological Resources Assessment, pp. 10, 11). Special-Status Plant Communities Four special-status plant communities have been reported in the vicinity: California Walnut Woodland, Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh, RAFSS, and Southern Sycamore Alder Riparian Woodland. During the field investigations, only RAFSS was observed onsite (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p.11). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 33 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact RAFSS is a community restricted to intermittently or rarely-flooded, low-gradient alluvial deposits along streams, washes, and fans within large canyons on the coastal slopes of the San Gabriel Mountains and San Bernardino Mountains in San Bernardino County. The vegetation comprises mostly of drought-deciduous subshrubs and large evergreen woody shrubs/trees, in which scale broom is dominant, co-dominant, or conspicuous in the shrub canopy (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 11). The RAFSS observed on the Project site has been isolated from seasonal scouring regimes for decades and has matured/senesced into mature RAFSS habitat that has been significantly degraded by its complete isolation from scour. The area has been further degraded by the invasion of the historic drainage channel by a eucalyptus forest, a non- native plant community that further degrades riparian habitat. This remnant plant community no longer functions as RAFSS habitat and no longer has long-term conservation value (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 11). Critical Habitat Under the federal Endangered Species Act, "Critical Habitat" is designated at the time of listing of a species or within one year of listing. Critical Habitat refers to specific areas within the geographical range of a species at the time it is listed that include the physical or biological features that are essential to the survival and eventual recovery of that species. Maintenance of these physical and biological features requires special management considerations or protection, regardless of whether individuals or the species are present or not. All federal agencies are required to consult with the USFWS regarding activities they authorize, fund, or permit which may affect a federally listed species or its designated Critical Habitat. The purpose of the consultation is to ensure that projects will not jeopardize the continued existence of the listed species or adversely modify or destroy its designated Critical Habitat. The designation of Critical Habitat does not affect private landowners, unless a project they are proposing is on federal lands, uses federal funds, or requires federal authorization or permits (e.g., funding from the Federal Highways Administration or a Clean Water Act Permit from the United States Army Corps of Engineers). If a there is a federal nexus, then the federal agency that is responsible for providing the funding or permit would consult with the USFWS (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 11). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 34 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The Project site is not located within, but is located immediately adjacent to federally designated Critical Habitat. The designated Critical Habitat bordering the easterly boundary of the Project site has been converted from natural habitat to residential development and no longer supports native RAFSS habitat needed to be considered viable Critical Habitat that could support San Bernardino kangaroo rat. As noted herein, no San Bernardino kangaroo rat, signs of San Bernardino kangaroo rat, or suitable burrows for San Bernardino kangaroo rat were observed during the field investigations. Further, the channelization of Etiwanda Creek has thoroughly isolated the Project site from the historic scouring regimes that create the RAFSS habitat utilized by San Bernardino kangaroo rat. Therefore, the loss or adverse modification of viable Critical Habitat from site development will not occur and consultation with the USFWS for impacts to Critical Habitat will not be required for implementation of the Project (Project Biological Resources Assessment, pp. 11, 12). Summary Based on the proposed Project footprint and existing site conditions, none of the special- status plant or wildlife species known to occur in the general vicinity of the Project site are expected to be directly or indirectly impacted from implementation of the Project. Therefore, it was determined that the Project would not result in potentially significant impacts to federally or State listed species known to occur in the general vicinity of the project site. Additionally, the development of the Project would not impact designated Critical Habitats or regional wildlife movement corridors/linkages (Project Biological Resources Assessment, p. 12). Project construction could however affect migratory birds that may present at the time site disturbing activities are initiated. Mitigation Measure BIO-1 (below) would reduce potential impacts to migratory birds to levels that would be less-than-significant. BIO-1: If construction occurs between February 1st and August 31 st, the Project biologist shall conduct a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds. The survey shall be conducted within 3 days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. The purpose of the survey is to identify any nesting birds that may be present and to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during Project vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. The Project biologist shall document negative survey results with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 35 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact will occur. If an active avian nest is encountered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall be excluded from a defined "no-disturbance buffer area." The size and configuration of the no-disturbance buffer area will be determined by the Project biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical conditions. The Project biologist will evaluate these factors in context when developing the no-disturbance buffer area. Limits of the no-disturbance buffer area shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas and to avoid the designated no-disturbance buffer area. The Project biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor any active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the no-disturbance buffer area may proceed. At the conclusion of monitoring activities, the Project Biological Monitor shall prepare a final report documenting monitoring activities, monitoring results, and any on-site mitigation actions. With incorporation of Mitigation Measure 13I0-1 above, the Project's potential to have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species is considered less-than- significant. b, c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. USFWS National Wetland Inventory queries determined that no riverine or other freshwater resources are mapped within the boundaries of the Project site. The nearest recognized resource is East Etiwanda Creek Channel, located approximately 1,750 feet easterly of the site (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 8). Existing storm drain improvements in the vicinity of the site currently intercept and redirect flows that historically flowed to the Project site. No discernible drainage courses, inundated areas, or wetland features that would be considered jurisdictional by the Corps, Regional Board, or CDFW were observed onsite. Based on the proposed site plan and limits of disturbance, Project activities will not result in impacts to Corps, Regional Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 36 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Board, or CDFW jurisdictional areas and regulatory approvals is not required (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 8). The Project does not propose or require facilities or activities that would substantially or adversely affect any off-site wetlands or off-site riparian habitat. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands or riparian habitat is less-than-significant. d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Habitat linkages provide connections between larger habitat areas that are separated by development. Wildlife corridors are similar to linkages but provide specific opportunities for animals to disperse or migrate between areas. A corridor can be defined as a linear landscape feature of sufficient width to allow animal movement between two comparatively undisturbed habitat fragments. Adequate cover is essential for a corridor to function as a wildlife movement area. It is possible for a habitat corridor to be adequate for one species yet still inadequate for others. Wildlife corridors are features that allow for the dispersal, seasonal migration, breeding, and foraging of a variety of wildlife species. Additionally, open space can provide a buffer against both human disturbance and natural fluctuations in resources (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 7). Isolation of the Project site combined with the removal of flows from an existing drainage channel and the maturation of the existing RAFSS plant community in the easterly portion of the Project site has substantively eliminated the potential to support local wildlife movement along Etiwanda Creek and in surrounding native habitats. Implementation of the Project would not disrupt or have any adverse effects on any migratory corridors or linkages that may occur in the general vicinity of the Project site (Project Biological Resources Assessment,p. 7). The Project site does not comprise or function as a native wildlife nursery. The Project does not propose or require uses or activities that would substantially or adversely affect any off-site native wildlife nursery(ies). Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 37 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites is considered less-than-significant. e) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City's Tree Preservation Ordinance (Municipal Code Section 17.80) recognizes trees as a valuable natural resource that helps define the community's character and are therefore worthy of preservation. The removal or relocation of a Heritage tree on private property requires approval of a Tree Removal Permit. Heritage trees are defined at City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.16.080 C: A heritage tree is defined as any tree which meets at least one of the following criteria: 1. All eucalyptus windrows; or 2. Any tree in excess of 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter at breast height(DBH) of 20 inches or more as measured 4%2 feet from ground level; or 3. Multi-trunk trees having a total diameter at breast height (DBH) of 30 inches or more as measured 4'/2 feet from ground level; or 4. A stand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival; or 5. Any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the planning director because of age, size, condition, location, or aesthetic qualities. All on-site trees were surveyed by a certified arborist to determine their eligibility as Heritage Trees. Based on the inspection, 21 trees qualify as Heritage Trees based on City criteria (Project Arborist Report, p. 3). As such, a Tree Removal Permit is required prior to removal or relocation of these trees. As stipulated under the Project Conditions of Approval, the Applicant would be required to conform to City Tree Removal Permit requirements. All other viable trees within the Project site would be conserved or maintained consistent with City requirements and the recommendations of the Project Arborist Report. Trees that are in significant states of decline or are otherwise likely to fail would be removed consistent with City requirements and the recommendations of the Project Arborist Report. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 38 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact It is also noted that as means of offsetting loss of existing trees and vegetation, the Project would plant a total of 232 new trees. Of these, 65 trees would be Eucalyptus replacement. The Project is not otherwise subject to or affected by any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. Based on the preceding, the Project's potential to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance is considered less-than-significant. f) No Impact. The Project site is not located within or subject to any adopted conservation areas identified at General Plan Figure RC-4, Sensitive Biological Resources. No other local or area-wide preservation or conservation plans or policies are applicable to the subject site. As such, the Project would not result in significant impacts involving local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources; or any other conservation plans or policies. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Habitat and Jurisdictional Assessment for the Proposed Residential Development Located within Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs) 0225-191-17 and 0225-191-09 in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (ELMT Consulting) March 3, 2021; On-Site Tree Inspection and Inventory Follow-up Report, Tentative Tract 20334; East Avenue, North of Blue Gum, Etiwanda [City of Rancho Cucamonga], CA (Jim Borer, Certified Arborist #496) March 2, 2021 (Revised); Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a O (✓) O () historical resource pursuant to § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an O (✓) O () archeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred O O (✓) () outside of dedicated cemeteries? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 39 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Comments: To assess potential impacts to cultural resources, a Cultural Resources Assessment has been conducted for the Project site (Cultural Resources Assessment, East Avenue and Banyan Street Alternative 6 Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California [LSA Associates, Inc.] February 2021). The Cultural Resources Assessment is presented as Appendix D. The following discussions summarize the Assessment's findings. Cultural Resources Assessment Methodology Records Search A cultural resources records search for the project area and a 1-mile radius was completed on February 25, 2020. The search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located at California State University, Fullerton. It included a review of all recorded historic and prehistoric archaeological sites within a 1-mile radius of the project area, as well as a review of known cultural resource survey and excavation reports. In addition, the records search also included review of the California State Historic Property Data File (HPD), which includes the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), California Points of Historical Interest(CPHI), and various local historic registers. Additional Research A review and analysis of online historic-period maps and aerial photographs for the Project site and surrounding area was performed during February—March 2020. Field Survey On February 29, 2020, all portions of the property were surveyed in systematic parallel transects spaced by approximately 10 meters (approximately 35 feet). Special attention was paid to areas of exposed soil for surface artifacts and features and rodent burrows for evidence of midden soil. The purpose of this survey was to identify and document any cultural resources that might be exposed and locate areas within the project that might be sensitive for cultural resources prior to the beginning of ground-disturbing activities. a, b) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. The Cultural Resources Assessment identified elements of a historic period gravity-flow concrete standpipe irrigation system within the Project site. The irrigation system was utilized for an orchard that was Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 40 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact formerly located on the site, which was likely associated with a 1910s residence located on an adjacent parcel. The Assessment concluded that the irrigation system itself is an unremarkable example of a common resource type in poor condition, and does not warrant further investigation. However, occupants of "grove houses" (such as the one associated with the irrigation system) sometimes disposed of refuse in their orchards. As such, the Project site may have the potential for undocumented surface and subsurface cultural resources. As directed by the Lead Agency and based on consultation with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, to avoid potential impacts to cultural resources, the following mitigation measures are incorporated: CR-1: In the event that cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60 foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within MM CR-4, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. CR-2: If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within CR-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the Project development activities and shall implement the Plan accordingly. CR-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the Project development, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100- foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code§7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of Project development activities. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 41 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact CR-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. CR-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. With the incorporation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-5, the potential for the Project to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archeological resource is considered less-than-significant. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. No formal cemetery exists within the Project site. Records searches and field surveys do not indicate potential presence of a formal cemetery. The likelihood of encountering human remains in the course of Project development is minimal. However, as required by California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, should human remains be found, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains were found to be prehistoric, the coroner would coordinate with the California Native American Heritage Commission as required by State law. Based on compliance with these existing regulations, the Project's potential to disturb human remains is considered less-than-significant. Sources: Cultural Resources Assessment, East Avenue and Banyan Street Alternative 6 Project, City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (LSA Associates, Inc.) February 2021; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 42 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact 6. ENERGY. Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental impact due O O (✓) () to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources,during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable O O (✓) () energy or energy efficiency? Comments: Information presented below is summarized in part from Energy Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 22, 2020 (Revised March 1, 2021), IS/MND Appendix E (Project Energy Assessment). Background and Introduction CEQA Guidelines (Guidelines) Appendix F Energy Conservation establishes parameters and context for determining whether a project would result in the inefficient, wasteful, and unnecessary consumption of energy. Guidelines Section 15126.2 Consideration and Discussion of Significant Environmental Impacts, as amended December 28, 2018, recognizes the need to consider Guidelines Appendix F Energy Conservation when analyzing project impacts. In this regard, Guidelines Section 15126.2 (b), excerpted below,provides the following direction: Energy Impacts. If analysis of the project's energy use reveals that the project may result in significant environmental effects due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption use of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources, the EIR [MND] shall mitigate that energy use. This analysis should include the project's energy use for all project phases and components, including transportation-related energy, during construction and operation. In addition to building code compliance, other relevant considerations may include, among others, the project's size, location, orientation, equipment use and any renewable energy features that could be incorporated into the project. (Guidance on information that may be included in such an analysis is presented in Guidelines Appendix F.) This analysis is subject to the rule of reason and shall focus on energy use that is caused by the project. This analysis may be included in related analyses of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, transportation or utilities in the discretion of the lead agency. The analysis presented here conforms to Guidelines Section 15126.2 (b) guidance. In summary, the Project would provide for, and promote, energy efficiencies consistent with applicable state or federal standards and regulations. The Project would also conform to City of Rancho Cucamonga energy efficiency and energy conservation measures. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 43 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact EXISTING CONDITIONS Electricity The California Energy Commission (CEC) provides forecasts for electricity and natural gas demand every two years as part of the Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) process. The forecasts include 3 energy demand cases (high, low, and middle) designed to capture a reasonable range of demand outcomes over the next 10 years. The high energy demand case incorporates relatively high economic/demographic growth, relatively low electricity and natural gas rates, and relatively low committed efficiency program, self-generation, and climate change impacts. The low energy demand case includes lower economic/demographic growth, higher assumed rates, and higher committed efficiency program and self-generation impacts. The mid case uses input assumptions at levels between the high and low cases. The forecasts include estimates of the effects of new legislation and trends in electric consumption such as the use of zero-emission automobiles. IEPR data indicates relatively stable consumption rates from 2005 through 2018, with an increase in consumption beginning in 2020 (Project Energy Assessment, p. 6). Southern California Edison (SCE) is the electrical utility provider for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. SCE also provides information on energy efficiency, rotating outages, emergency preparedness, electrical safety tips, and tree planting guidelines to ensure non-interference with electrical utility lines (Project Energy Assessment,p. 9). Transportation Energy California is home to 30 million registered cars, trucks, buses, and other motorized on-road vehicles. The state's history has been, in part, a history of the automobile and the associated impacts on personal mobility, land-use planning, and air quality. In recognition of these challenges, California has enacted a suite of policies and goals to shift the transportation sector toward cleaner, sustainable fuels and more efficient technology vehicles. IEPR data indicates very stable consumption rates for jet fuel and diesel through 2030. Gasoline consumption is forecasted to decline through 2030 (Project Energy Assessment,p. 7). Natural Gas Natural gas is an important energy source for California. Natural gas provides energy to heat homes, cook food, and generate electricity. Currently in California, natural gas serves more than 10.5 million homes, about 445,000 businesses, about 37,000 factories and industrial consumers, and more than 640 electric generating units. The greatest consumers of natural gas in decreasing Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 44 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact order are electric power generation, residential, industrial, mining, commercial, and other. In California since 1990, natural gas demand has remained relatively flat in all but the electric power sector which has steadily increased (Project Energy Assessment,p. 8). IEPR data generally shows a decreasing reliance on natural gas through 2024. The CEC indicates increased reliance on natural gas for power generation between 2024 and 2026 due to expiration of long-term power supply contracts (purchase agreements)with coal facilities outside California (Project Energy Assessment,p. 8). Southern California Gas Company (The Gas Company) provides natural gas to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Gas Company also provides customers with appliance services, an energy efficiency and rebate program, and information on emergency preparedness and air quality(Project Energy Assessment, p. 9). State and Local Energy Efficiency/Energy Conservation Plans, Policies,Regulations Project consistency with State and City Energy Efficiency/Energy Conservation Plans and related policies and/or regulations relevant to the Project are summarized at 6-1. In addition to the plans, policies, and regulations listed below, the State and City have also implemented measures that reduce air pollutant emissions and greenhouse gases. As a corollary effect, these measures in part act to promote energy efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Table 6-1 State and Local Energy Efficiency/Energy Efficiency/Energy Conservation Plan Consistency PLANS,POLICES,REGULATIONS Remarks STATE of CALIFORNIA California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6:Energy Efficiency Standards California Code Title 24, Part 6 (also referred to as Consistent: The Project would be designed, constructed the California Energy Code), was promulgated by and operated to meet or exceed incumbent CCR Title 24 the CEC in 1978 in response to a legislative mandate Energy Efficiency Standards. to create uniform building codes to reduce California's energy consumption. To these ends, the Based on the preceding, the Project is considered California Energy Code provides energy efficiency consistent with, and would not interfere with or obstruct standards for residential and nonresidential implementation of CCR Title 24, Part 6: Energy buildings. The Project would be required to comply Efficiency Standards. with energy efficiency standards in effect at the time of building permit application(s). CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Consistent: The Project would be designed, constructed Building Standards Code (CALGreen). and operated to meet or exceed incumbent CCR Title 24 CALGreen is a comprehensive and uniform CALGreen Standards. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 45 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Table 6-1 State and Local Energy Efficiency/ ner Conservation Plan Consistency PLANS,POLICES,REGULATIONS Remarks regulatory code for all residential, commercial, and school buildings that went in effect on January 1, Based on the preceding, the Project is considered 2011. CALGreen is updated on a regular basis,with consistent with, and would not interfere with or obstruct the most recent update consisting of the 2016 implementation of CCCR, Title 24,Part 11: CALGreen. California Green Building Code Standards that became effective January 1, 2017. Under state law, local jurisdictions are permitted to adopt more stringent requirements. Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan Consistent: The Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan establishes goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce resource consumption (e.g., water, energy, and fuel), protection of habitat and biological resources, and improve air quality. With Energy Efficiency Goals and Policies respect to efficient use of energy the Sustainable Community Action Plan relies on California laws and Policy 1: Reduce energy demand by improved regulations including the California Building Code and efficiency and building design. Code updates. The Project would implement conservation strategies acting to reduce energy consumption consistent with provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan, California laws and regulations including the California Building Code and Code updates. Based on the preceding, the Project is considered consistent with Policy 1: Reduce energy demand by improved efficiency and building design. Sources: CCR Title 24,Part 6:Energy Efficiency Standards; CCR,Title 24,Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code;City of Ontario Policy Plan; Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan (City of Rancho Cucamonga)April 2017;Remarks by Applied Planning,Inc. a, b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Project construction and operational energy consumption estimates are summarized below. Please refer also to detailed energy consumption modeling and spread sheet calculations presented in the Project Energy Assessment, IS/MND Appendix E. Construction Energy Consumption Sources of Project construction energy consumption include: electrical energy consumed during construction, fuel consumed by construction equipment, and fuel consumed by employees and vendors are considered. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project(SUBTT20334) Page 46 Less Than Significant Less Potentially with Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact The total electricity usage from on-site project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 10,142 kWh (Project Energy Assessment,p. 9). Project construction equipment would consume diesel fuel. The aggregate diesel fuel consumption rate for all equipment is estimated at 18.5 hp-hr-gal., obtained from California Air Resources Board (ARB) Emissions Factors Tables. Diesel fuel would be supplied by existing commercial fuel providers serving the City and region. Project construction equipment activities would consume an estimated 55,043 gallons of diesel fuel (Project Energy Assessment,p. 9). Construction worker trips would comprise Light duty auto (LDA) travel along area roadways. LDAs are powered by gasoline. Construction worker trips would generate an estimated 158,760 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). LDAs have an estimated aggregated fuel efficiency of 29.32 miles per gallon (mpg). Construction worker trips would in an estimated 5,415 gallons of gasoline consumption(Project Energy Assessment, p. 9). Operational Energy Consumption Vehicles accessing the developed Project would consume gasoline. Vehicles accessing the developed Project would be LDAs and would result in an estimated 557,249 annual VMT. As noted above, LDAs have an estimated aggregated fuel efficiency of 29.32 miles per gallon (mpg). Vehicles accessing the developed Project would therefore result in an estimated 19,906 gallons of gasoline consumption annually (Project Energy Assessment, p. 9). The Project residential uses would consume natural gas for water and space heating, and electricity for lighting and appliances. The Project natural gas consumption is estimated at 1,425 kBTU/year. The Project electricity consumption is estimated at 113,746 kWh/year(Project Energy Assessment,p. 9). Quantified Project energy consumption estimates are summarized at Table 6-2. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 47 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Table 6-2 Project Energy Consumption Summary Construction Energy Consumption Electricity 10,142 kWh Construction Equipment 55,043 gallons(diesel fuel) Vendor Trips 2,755 gallons(diesel fuel) Worker Trips 5,415 gallons(gasoline) Operation Annual Energy Consumption Vehicular Travel 19,006 gallons(gasoline) Electricity 113,746 kWh Natural Gas 1,425 kBTU Source:Energy Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve&Associates, LLQ June 22,2020(Revised March 1,2021). The Project proposes conventional residential uses and conventional construction practices. The Project does not propose atypical residential development that would result in significant environmental effects due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption use of energy, or wasteful use of energy resources. Further, the Project's limited scope of development (17 residential units) would not cause or result in the need for additional energy-producing facilities or energy delivery systems. The Project would be required to conform to standards established under the California Code Title 24, Part 6 (the California Energy Code) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen; CCR, Title 24, Part 11) as implemented by the City. The Project would also implement applicable provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan, which identifies general goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce resource consumption (e.g., water, energy, and fuel), protection of habitat and biological resources, and improve air quality. In summary, the Project is of limited scale and proposes a total of 17 residential units of conventional/contemporary design. The Project would meet or surpass standards established under the California Code Title 24, Part 6 (the California Energy Code) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen; CCR, Title 24, Part 11) as implemented by the City. The Project would also implement applicable efficiency/conservation measures provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 48 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Community Action Plan. The Project does not propose or require additional energy- producing facilities or energy delivery systems. On this basis, the potential for the Project to result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation; or conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency is less-than-significant. Sources: Energy Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 22, 2020 (Revised March 1, 2021); CCR Title 24, Part 6: Energy Efficiency Standards; CCR, Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards Code; Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan (City of Rancho Cucamonga) April 2017; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of loss,injury,or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated O O (✓) () on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? O O (✓) () iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including (� (� (✓) () liquefaction? iv) Landslides? (� (� O (✓) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? O (� (✓) () c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that O O (✓) () would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of (� (� (✓� the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 49 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of (✓) septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or O (✓) O () site or unique geologic feature? Comments: Potential geology and soils impacts of the Project are evaluated and substantiated in detail in: Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 10-Acre Residential Development Tract 20334, East of East Avenue Approximately 300 Feet South of Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) June 10, 2020 (Updated February 22, 2021) (Project Geotechnical Investigation). Analysis, results and conclusions of the Project Geotechnical Investigation provide the basis for the following discussions. The Project Geotechnical Investigation in its entirety is provided at IS/MND Appendix F. a, i, ii) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site is located approximately 0.9 miles southeast of the Red Hill-Etiwanda Avenue fault, 1.8 miles south of the Cucamonga fault, 4.9 miles southwest of the San Bernardino Valley section of the San Jacinto fault zone, and 8.7 miles southwest of the San Bernardino Mountains section of the San Andreas fault zone (Project Geotechnical Investigation),p. 5). Considering the location of active and potentially active faults relative to the Project site, the potential for surface fault rupture at the site is expected to be low and a surface fault rupture hazard evaluation is not mandated for the Project site. (Project Geotechnical Investigation,p.8). The California Building Code requires design, engineering, and construction methods that minimize the effects of earthquake on structures. As part of the City's standard review and approval of development projects, any new development must provide a geotechnical study for review and approval by the City Engineer, and comply with the requirements of the approved geotechnical report, and applicable provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building Code and California Building Code (CBC). Compliance Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 50 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact with these requirements ensures that potential strong seismic groundshaking impacts remain at levels that are less-than-significant. a, iii) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Liquefaction and seismically-induced settlement or ground failure are generally associated with strong seismic shaking in areas where groundwater tables are at relatively shallow depths(within 50 feet of the ground surface)and/or when the area is underlain by loose, cohesionless deposits. The Project site is not located within a mapped potential liquefaction area. Historic high groundwater in the area is expected to be approximately 200 to 300 feet below ground surface. The Geotechnical Investigation concluded that, at this depth, the site exhibits low liquefaction potential(Project Geotechnical Investigation,pp. 10, 11). The Project Geotechnical Investigation concluded that onsite soils are susceptible to low seismic settlement, consistent with removal of loose soils per the Project Geotechnical Investigation recommendations (Project Geotechnical Investigation, p. 11). The Project Geotechnical Investigation concluded that the Project site is not susceptible to static slope instability or seismically induced landslides (Project Geotechnical Investigation,p. 11). Short of a catastrophic event, design of structures in accordance with the Project Geotechnical Investigation, the California Building Code, and current seismic engineering practices is sufficient to reduce potential effects of ground shaking, including potential liquefaction hazards, at the Project site below the level of significance. Through established Site Plan,Building Permit, and Certificate of Occupancy requirements, the City will verify that required design and construction measures are incorporated throughout Project development and are functionally implemented in the completed structures and facilities. Accordingly, it is anticipated that any site-specific geologic constraints which may be encountered during the course of Project implementation can be mitigated to a less-than-significant level within the context of the findings and Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 51 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact recommendations of the required site- and design-specific geotechnical investigations, and existing City/CBC seismic design regulations, standards,and policies. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects of seismic groundshaking or seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction is considered less-than-significant. a, iv) No Impact. The Project site and surrounding properties are essentially level and exhibit little or no topographic relief. There is no evidence of recent or historic landslides affecting the Project site or vicinity properties.Based on the preceding,the Project will not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving landslides. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga is situated within a designated Soil Erosion Control Area (General Plan EIR Exhibit 4.7-4). The Rancho Cucamonga area is subject to strong Santa Ana wind conditions from September to April, which generates blowing sand and dust, and creates erosion problems. Construction activities associated with the Project will temporarily expose underlying soils, thereby increasing their susceptibility to erosion until the Project is fully implemented. Potential erosion impacts incurred during construction activities are maintained at below the level of significance through the Project's mandated compliance with a City-approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and compliance with SCAQMD Rules that prohibit grading activities and site disturbance during high wind events. At Project completion, potential soil erosion impacts in the area will be resolved, as pavement, roads,buildings, and landscaping are established, overcovering previously exposed soils. The Project involves construction of conventional residential facilities and supporting site improvements within an essentially level area of the City. The Project does not propose to significantly alter existing topography. Any required cut/fill within the Project area will establish suitable building pads and facilitate efficient site drainage. Based on the preceding, potential impacts associated with erosion or changes in topography are considered less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 52 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact c, d) Less-Than-Significant. The Project Geotechnical Investigation concluded that the site is appropriate for the proposed development, provided that design and construction occur in compliance with the requirements presented within the Investigation. The Project would be required to comply with requirements of the final City-approved final geotechnical report, and applicable provisions of the City Building Code and CBC, to include design- and site-appropriate means to avoid or minimize any expansive soils concerns that may be encountered. The Investigation also noted that recommendations of the Investigation are preliminary and should be reviewed during construction and revised accordingly if geotechnical conditions encountered at the site vary from those preliminarily identified in the Investigation (Project Geotechnical Investigation, p. 27). The Project would be required to comply with recommendations of the final City-approved final geotechnical report including but not limited to subsequent and on-going review of site conditions during Project construction with any necessary responsive revisions to Project design(s) and construction protocols. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse; or be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code, is less-than-significant. e) No Impact. The Project would connect to existing available sanitary sewer lines located in adjacent East Avenue. No septic tanks or other alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed. Thus, there is no potential for adverse impacts due to soil limitations relative to septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. f) Less-Than-Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. No unique paleontological resources or geologic features are known to exist within the Project site or in the Project vicinity. There is however the potential for as-yet unknown subsurface paleontological resources to present within the Project site. Mitigation Measure GEO-1 is incorporated to ensure that the potential for the Project to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature is reduced to levels that would be less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 53 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact GEO-1: If potential paleontological resources (i.e., plant or animal fossils) are encountered before or during grading, the developer will retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate measures to protect or preserve them for study. The paleontologist shall submit a report of findings that will also provide specific recommendations regarding further mitigation measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program must include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor should immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. As mitigated, the potential for the Project to directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature would be less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Geotechnical Investigation, Proposed 10-Acre Residential Development Tract 20224, East of East Avenue Approximately 300 Feet South of Banyan Street, City of Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) June 10, 2020 (Updated February 22, 2021); Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 54 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: () () 0 ) a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of () () (✓) () greenhouse gases? Comments: Potential greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions impacts of the Project are evaluated and substantiated in detail in Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 1, 2020 (Revised February 24, 2021) (Project AQ/GHG Study). Results and conclusions of the Project AQ/GHG Study provide the basis for the following discussions. The Project AQ/GHG Study in its entirety is provided at IS/MND Appendix B. a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. In its most recent guidance, the SCAQMD Working Group has proposed a screening-level threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year (MTCO2e/year) for all land use types. Projects that generate GHG emissions of less than 3,000 MTCO2e/year would not be considered substantive sources of GHG emissions. For the purposes of this analysis, GHG emissions not exceeding the SCAQMD 3,000 MTCO2e/year screening-level would be less-than-significant. Project construction and operational GHG Emissions are summarized at Tables 8-1 and 8-2, respectively. Table 8-1 Construction GHG Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2EQ Total Construction Emissions 594.6 0.1 0.0 598.0 Averaged Over 30 Years 19.8 0.0 0.0 19.9 Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes,City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 55 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Table 8-2 Annual Project Emissions (Metric Tons) CO2 CH4 N20 CO2EQ Annual Operational Emissions 330.3 0.3 0.0 338.2 Annualized Construction Emissions 19.8 0.0 0.0 19.9 Total Annual Emissions 350.1 0.3 0.0 358.1 Source:Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve&Associates,LLC)June 1,2020(Revised February 24,2021). As indicated, Project GHG emissions would not exceed 3,000 MTCO2e/year and would not be considered a substantive source of GHG emissions. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment would be less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. As summarized below, the Project would be consistent with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan and by extension would be consistent with and would not conflict with any other applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. City of Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan Consistency The Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan (2017) (Sustainable Community Action Plan) identifies GHG emissions sources, presents current and future GHG emissions estimates, identifies a GHG reduction target for future years, and provides strategic policies and actions to reduce GHG emissions from energy, transportation, land use, water use, and waste sectors. The Sustainable Community Action Plan is consistent with and implements GHG emissions legislation, GHG emissions reduction strategies, and GHG emissions reduction policies implemented by the State of California. The Plan is consistent with and implements GHG emissions legislation, GHG emissions reduction strategies, and GHG emissions reduction policies implemented by the San Bernardino Council of Governments (SBCOG). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 56 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact The Plan can be accessed at: https://rcdocs.cityofrc.us/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=53 7850&dbid=0&repo=RanchoCu camonaa&cr=1. The Sustainable Community Action Plan's existing and the projected GHG inventories are based on land use designations and buildout of the City reflected in the City General Plan. The Project is consistent with the land use designation and projected buildout conditions presented in the City General Plan. Since the Project is consistent with the buildout conditions reflected under the General Plan, the Project by extension would not result in GHG emissions beyond those considered and addressed in the Sustainable Community Action Plan. All development in the City including the Project, is required to conform to all City- adopted policies including those presented in the Sustainable Community Action Plan. The City through established design and development review processes would ensure that applicable Sustainable Community Action Plan GHG-reducing strategies would be incorporated in the Project. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Focused Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emission Analysis for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) June 1, 2020 (Revised February 24, 2021); Rancho Cucamonga Sustainable Community Action Plan(2017); Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 57 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment O O (✓� through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely O O (✓� hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous O O O (✓) materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, O O O (✓) where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport,would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an O O (✓) ( ) adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to O O (✓) ( ) a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires? Comments: Analysis and findings presented below are based in part on Phase I and Limited Phase H Environmental Site Assessment, 6179 and 6183 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) September 3, 2020 (Revised February 26, 2021) (Project Phase I/II ESA), IS/MND Appendix G. a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. During the normal course of construction activities, there will be limited transport of potentially hazardous materials (e.g., gasoline, diesel fuel, paints, solvents, fertilizer, etc.) to and from the Project site. Long-term operations of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 58 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Project would involve the use of substances typically associated with individual households, like paints, cleaning solvents, fertilizers, and motor oil. The Project would be required to comply with Federal, State and local regulations addressing transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials. Compliance with Federal, State, and local regulations concerning hazardous materials and/or waste ensures that the potential for creation of a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials remain at less-than-significant levels. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project Phase I ESA and Limited Phase II ESA (collectively ESAs) evaluates the potential for the Project site to be adversely affected by onsite and offsite recognized environmental conditions (RECs), historical RECs (HRECs), or controlled RECs (CRECs). In summary, the Project Phase I/II ESA "revealed no evidence of RECs, CRECs, or HRECs in connection with the subject site (Phase I/II ESA, p. 27). On this basis, existing conditions at or affecting the Project site do not comprise a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential development. The Project residential uses do not propose or require facilities or operations that would involve the substantive use of hazardous materials. The Project does not require facilities or operations that would otherwise comprise a significant hazard to the public or the environment. The Project would comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations addressing hazards and hazardous materials. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment is less-than-significant. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The school nearest the Project site, Summit Intermediate School, is located approximately 400 feet northerly of the site. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential uses, and does not include elements or aspects that would create or otherwise result in hazardous emissions. The Project does not propose or Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 59 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact require substantive handling of hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste. Pre-packaged materials such as paint, solvents, glues, fertilizers, used during construction and maintenance are subject to extensive local, State, and federal regulations, and are not considered sources of potentially significant hazardous materials or hazardous emissions. On this basis, the potential for the Project to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school is less-than-significant. d) No Impact. Based on information contained within the EnviroStor database (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.goy/public/), maintained by the Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), the Project site is not on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. Nor are there Government Code Section 65962.5-listed sites within the Phase I/Limited Phase II Radius Report(s). There is therefore no potential for the Project to be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. e) No Impact. The Project site is not located within an adopted airport land use plan or within two miles of any airport. The airport nearest the Project site, Ontario International Airport, is located approximately seven miles southwesterly of the Project site. At this distance, the site is located outside of any identified aircraft-related safety or aircraft noise impact zones. f) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project does not propose designs or require activities that would interfere with any identified emergency response or emergency evacuation plan. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has a developed roadway network which provides emergency access and evacuation routes. Access to this existing roadway network will be provided to the Project site. On-going coordination with the local fire and police departments during construction will ensure that potential interference with emergency response and evacuation efforts are avoided. Additionally, the Project would implement a City-approved Construction Traffic Management Plan (please refer to IS/MND Preface, Project Description, 1.5.1.2, Construction Traffic Management Plan). The Construction Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 60 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Traffic Management Plan would minimize the potential for Project construction activities to impair or obstruct emergency response and evacuation efforts. The City's Emergency Operation Plan comprises the City's primary emergency response and emergency management program. The Emergency Operation Plan "details the City's responsibility before, during, and after emergencies. The program also maintains compliance with the federally mandated National Incident Management System (NIMS) and the State Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) through regular Incident Command System training and disaster preparedness exercises for employees and the community" (General Plan, p. PS-7). The Project does not propose or require uses or facilities that would interfere with or obstruct the Emergency Operation Plan. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan is less-than-significant. g) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site is located within an area designated by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District (RCFD) as "High Fire Hazard" (Rancho Cucamonga Fire District"Fire Hazard Property Lookup"). As means of reducing wildfire hazards, RCFD has developed protocols and design guidelines that act to minimize wildfire hazards. Representative RCFD protocols and design guidelines include: • Landscaping Guidelines (Provides a list not of approved plants for use in landscaping. • Undesirable Plants and Trees (A list of undesirable plants and trees if located within the Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area). • RCFD 50150150 Alternative(RCFD landscaping requirements if undesirable plants or trees are selected. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 61 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact • Ready Set Go Action Plan (Personalized wildfire action plan(s) to harden homes in the case of a wildfire) • Guide to Fire Adapted Communities (A Guide to help leaders, planners, emergency professionals, and citizens learn the best approaches and programs to help their community become more fire adapted). • Action Steps for Around Your Home (Measures to protect properties form wildfire hazards). • Wildfire Preparedness for Household Pets (Measures to protect pets and provide for their evacuation). • National Fire Protection Association (National Fire Protection Association Measures to adapt to living with wildfire hazards and cooperative neighborhood action plans to prevent losses due to wildfire). • Ready RC Preparedness Guide (Measures/plans/information addressing wildfire events including but not limited to: emergency kit checklists, evacuation route maps, and shelter information. See also: https://www.ci . ofrc.us/public-safety/fire/wildland-fire-area-info. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential uses (17 dwelling units) in an area of the City that is developed with similar urban residential uses. The Project site abuts and is provided direct access to improved and City-maintained East Avenue. Access to the Project would be provided consistent with City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire District requirements. There are no adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans that would be affected by the Project. Additionally, the Project would implement fire hazard protection and suppression measures stipulated by the City and RCFD through the Project Conditions of Approval. In this latter regard, per City and RCFD requirements, a site-specific or project-specific protection plan shall be prepared Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 62 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact for the Project. The Project fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires is less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Fire Hazard Property Lookup, 3 Mar. 2021, https://regis.maps.arcais.com/gpps/webgppviewer/index.html?id=fae4l 3 0265 3 64768 849f90cf30 9ea6ae (Fire Hazard information for APN 0225-191-06); Phase I and Limited Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, 6179 and 6183 East Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, California (Leighton and Associates, Inc.) September 3, 2020 (Revised February 26, 2021); Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge O O (✓) () requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere O O (✓� () substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces,in a manner which would: i) result in a substantial erosion or siltation on-or off-site; O O (✓) ( ) ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface O O (✓) ( ) runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed (✓) the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff;or Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 63 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact iv)impede or redirect flood flows? O O O (✓) d) Inundation by seiche,tsunami,or mudflow? O O O (✓) e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality O O (✓) O control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? Comments: Analysis and findings presented below are based in part on Tentative Tract 20334, Rancho Cucamonga, Drainage Study (Encompass Associates, Inc.) December 21, 2020 (Project Drainage Study), IS/MND Appendix H. a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Compliance with applicable existing City Stormwater Pollution Prevention Programs (SWPPPs); National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements; and mandated Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) requirements would minimize the potential for the Project to substantively contribute additional polluted runoff during Project construction, or over the operational life of the Project. The Project SWPPP; design, construction, and operation of the Project stormwater management system; and development and implementation of the Project WQMP would conform to applicable City and RWQCB requirements. Under the State Construction General Permit Order (Construction General Permit), "[d]ischargers whose projects disturb one (1) or more acres of soil or whose projects disturb less than one acre but are part of a larger common plan of development that in total disturbs one or more acres, are required to obtain coverage under the Construction General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (California State Water Resources Control Board, "Construction Stormwater General Permits"). The Construction General Permit requires the development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) by a certified Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). The Project would be required to comply with SWPPP provisions stipulated under the Construction General Permit. BMPs implemented under the Project WQMP would include both structural and non- structural control methods. Structural controls used to manage storm water pollutant Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 64 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact levels typically include detention basins, oil/grit separators, and porous pavement. Non- structural controls focus on controlling pollutants at the source, generally through implementing erosion and sediment control plans. A complete list of Project-specific BMPs can be found within the Project WQMP,presented at IS/MND Appendix H. Please refer to WQMP Section 4,Best Management Practices (BMP). Design, configuration, and locations of proposed stormwater management system improvements would be reviewed and approved by the City and RWQCB prior to, or concurrent with, application for grading permits. All Project stormwater management system improvements would be constructed by the Project Applicant, or would otherwise be assured (via Project Conditions of Approval or other means established by the Lead Agency) to be in place and operational prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the Project. The implemented Project stormwater management system; compliance with applicable regulations and water quality standards; compliance with NPDES permitting requirements, compliance with WQMP requirements, and the implemented Project BMPs would minimize the potential for the Project to violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts in this regard are therefore considered less-than- significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would not contribute to groundwater depletion, nor discernibly interfere with groundwater recharge. Water is provided throughout the City by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD, District). Groundwater which may be consumed by the Project and the City of Rancho Cucamonga as a whole is recharged pursuant to the District's policies and programs. There are no designated groundwater recharge areas within the Project site. The Project would not otherwise affect designated recharge areas. Direct additions or withdrawals of groundwater are not proposed by or required by the Project. Further, construction proposed by the Project will not involve substructures or other intrusions at depths that would significantly impair or alter the direction or rate of flow of groundwater. Additionally, as substantiated herein, the Project would not result in Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 65 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact adverse impacts to water supplies including groundwater supplies. See also discussion at IS Checklist Item 19. Utilities and Service Systems. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the Project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin is less-than-significant. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Existing west-to-east trending drainage patterns would be maintained under the developed Project. The Project does not propose or require alteration of the course(s) of any streams or rivers. Potential erosion impacts incurred during construction activities are mitigated below the level of significance through the Project's mandated compliance with a City-approved SWPPP and compliance with SCAQMD [fugitive dust] Rules that prohibit grading activities and site disturbance during high wind events. Additionally, a Grading and Drainage Plan must be approved by the Building Official and City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. As proposed under the Project stormwater management concept, developed stormwaters within the Project site would be directed generally easterly toward Golden Lock Place. The Project would also construct v-ditches to intercept and convey off-site storm flows entering the Project site from the north, and would direct these storm flows easterly toward Golden Lock Place. The Project would construct all necessary storm drain improvements and storm drain connections within Golden Lock Place consistent with City requirements. All Project stormwater management systems and improvements would be development-specific and localized to the Project area. The rate and amount of surface water runoff from the developed Project site would be controlled via the Project stormwater management system and Project WQMP so as to preclude substantial erosion, siltation, flooding, exceedance of stormwater drainage system capacities, or contribution of substantial additional pollutants. All Project stormwater management system improvements and the Project WQMP are subject to review and approval by the City. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 66 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact The Project lies within a 500-year flood zone but is not subject to substantial flood flows. The Project does not propose uses or facilities that would otherwise impede or redirect flood flows. Based on the preceding, the Project's potential to: substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or impede or redirect flood flows is less-than-significant. d) No Impact. The Project site is not located near any bodies of water or water storage facility that would be considered susceptible to seiche. Nor is the Project site located proximate to coastal waters, and as such, is not subject to tsunami hazards. No slopes of significance have been identified on or near the Project site, and the Project site has not historically been affected by mudflows. Impacts related to tsunami, seiche, or mudflow hazards will not affect the Project. e) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would implement water quality control measures consistent with City and RWQCB requirements. Please refer to detailed measures presented in the Project WQMP, IS/MND Appendix H. The Project would therefore not result in potentially adverse water quality impacts and would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan, in this instance, the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana Region. The Project does not propose or require direct withdrawal of groundwater. Neither would the Project adversely affect designated groundwater recharge areas or groundwater recharge facilities. The Project does not propose uses or activities that would conflict with a sustainable groundwater management plan. The Project would implement Low Impact Development (LID) measures facilitating infiltration of treated stormwaters to the groundwater table. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan is less-than- significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 67 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Tentative Tract No. 20334, Rancho Cucamonga, Drainage Study (Encompass Associates, Inc.) December 21, 2020; California State Water Resources Control Board. "Construction Stormwater General Permits." California Waterboards, 11 Aug. 2020, www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/constpermits.html. Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (✓) b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict (✓) with any land use plan,policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project proposes construction of conventional contemporary single-family residential uses. No established communities exist within the subject site, nor does the Project propose elements or activities that would disrupt or divide an established community. The Project residential uses are similar to and compatible with vicinity land uses. The potential for the Project to physically divide an established community is therefore less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site is "Residential — Very Low" (0.1 — 2.0 DU/AC). The Project proposes development of the approximately 10-acre Project site with up to 17 single-family residences. The Project's proposed single-family residential uses and proposed residential density of 1.7 DU/AC are permitted under the Project site's existing General Plan Land Use designation. The Project is located within the Etiwanda Specific Plan (Specific Plan). Within the Specific Plan, the site is designated as "Residential VL:Very Low" (1 — 2 DU/AC). The Specific Plan establishes Optional Development Standards for residential development Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 68 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact projects. Optional Development Standards for the VL Residential District are summarized at Table 11-1. Table 11-1 Etiwanda Specific Plan-Very Low L District Optional Development Standards Minimum Site Area 5 Acres Max.DU/AC 2 DU/AC Open Space Requirements Private Open Space 2,000 SF/DU Common Open Space 25%of Site Total Open Space 65%of Site Setbacks Along Public Streets 30 Feet Avg.(Vary+/- 10 feet) Along Private Roads 25 Feet Minimum At Interior Site Boundary 30 Feet Minimum Residential Building Separations Side-to-Side 30 Feet Minimum Other(Front-to-Side,etc.) 30 Feet Minimum On-Site Windrows(linear ft./acre) 100 Feet Minimum On-site Greenways Minimum one connection across Project site StreetSide Landscaping Required (Prior to Certificate of Occupancy) Source:Etiwanda Specific Plan,Optional Development Standards,p.5-11,Figure 5-3. Notes:In order to qualify for open space credit,common open space areas shall be designed to be visually open to the extent possible and shall not be fenced with solid view-obstructing fencing for more than 50%of their periphery. Gross acreage may be considered for density calculations in the VL District. The Lead Agency has determined that the Project development concept conforms with the Specific Plan Optional Development Standards for the VL Residential District. The Project does not otherwise propose or require uses or activities that could potentially conflict with an applicable land use plan,policy, or regulation. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect is less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 69 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; City of City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral O O O (✓) resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important O O O (✓) mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: a, b) No Impact. The site is not designated as a State Aggregate Resources Area or as a valuable mineral resource recovery site (General Plan, Figure RC-2 and Table RC-I). Nor does the Project propose or require uses or activities that would affect off-site mineral resources. The Project would have no impact on the availability of known mineral resources. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 13. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent O (✓) O ( ) increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundbome vibration or O O (✓) ( ) groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip (� O (� (✓� or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 70 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Comments: Analysis and conclusions presented in Noise Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) April 30, 2020 (Revised March 4, 2021) (Project Noise Impact Analysis) provide the basis for the following discussions. The Project Noise Impact Analysis is presented at IS/MND Appendix I. a) Less-Than-Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. verview The Project proposes conventional single-family residential development within an urban context. Residential uses proposed by the Project are not considered substantive noise sources in either a temporary or long-term context. Construction of the Project would generate temporary and intermittent noise that could adversely affect nearby noise- sensitive receptors. Mitigation is proposed that would reduce construction-source noise to levels that would be less-than-significant. Traffic generated by the Project would not substantively affect area noise levels. Effects of Project-source Noise on Off-site Land Uses Project noise sources that could affect off-site land uses would include temporary construction-source noise and long-term operational-source. Potential impacts of these noise sources on off-site land uses are evaluated below. Project Construction-Source Noise Project construction-source noise would result in temporary, intermittent, and potentially adverse conditions at proximate offsite receivers. Project construction-source noise would result from on-site construction activities, such as site preparation, grading, building construction, paving and site finishes, and architectural coating. Noise levels at off-site receptors would be greatest during initial site preparation activities (grading, excavation) when heavy equipment may operate near the Project boundaries. As discussed in the City General Plan EIR, a "typical construction project that is as close as 50 feet from residential land uses, the worst-case unmitigated peak construction noise Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 71 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact levels would be as high 95 dBA. The average noise levels are typically 5 to 15 dB lower than the peak noise levels, so average noise levels (Leq) at the nearest residences would be in the range of 85 dBA (Leq). These [unmitigated] noise levels would be in excess of that which is permitted by the Noise Ordinance" (General Plan EIR,p. 4.12-17). The City Noise Ordinance defines noise levels that cannot be exceeded for a certain period of time. In terms of a noise metric this represents the L(%) metric. The lowest outdoor noise levels defined in the Noise Ordinance are the levels that cannot be exceeded for more than 15 minutes in an hour. This is equivalent to the "L25" metric. As another illustrative example, the Noise Ordinance defines a noise level that cannot be exceeded for more than 5 minute per hour. This is the noise level exceeded 8.3% of the time or the "L8.3"metric. The Project Noise Impact Analysis concludes that the peak construction-source noise (Lmax) received at residential uses nearest the Project site would range from 70 — 95 dBA (Noise Impact Analysis, p. 13). The average noise levels (L25) are typically 15 dB lower than the peak (Lmax) noise levels. The 15 dB value is based on general observations during construction noise measurements over the past 20 years. Average noise levels received at the nearest residential uses (approximately 80 feet from Project construction activities) could range from 55 — 80 dBA (L25). Anticipated received noise levels at these residences are however expected to represent a mid-range value of approximately 6ldBA (L25) (Noise Impact Analysis, p. 15). At the next closest residential use (approximately 140 feet from Project construction activities) average received noise levels could range from 46 to 71 dBA (L25). Anticipated received noise levels at this residential use is however expected to represent a mid-range value of approximately 58.5 dBA (L25) (Noise Impact Analysis, p. 15). Received noise at residential uses located approximately 150 easterly of the Project site, across Golden Lock Place could range from 45 to 70 dBA (L25). Anticipated received noise levels at these residential uses is however expected to represent a mid-range value of approximately 57.5 dBA (L25) (Noise Impact Analysis, p. 15). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 72 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact The City of Rancho Cucamonga regulates construction-source noise at City Development Code Section 17.66.050 D. 4. As noted therein, the following actions/conditions are exempt from Development Code noise standards: 4. Noise sources associated with, or vibration created by, construction, repair, remodeling, or grading of any real property or during authorized seismic surveys, provided said activities: a. When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church or similar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line. b. When adjacent to a commercial or industrial use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday and Sunday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the noise standards of 70 dBA at the when measured at the adjacent property line (Development Code, p. 17.66-4). As discussed above, unmitigated Project construction-source noise at the nearest potentially affected receptors are anticipated to range from 57.5 dBA (L25) to 61dBA (L25) and would not exceed the City Noise Ordinance 65 dBA (L25) standard. To ensure that Project construction-source noise remains within acceptable parameters and performance standards established under the City Noise Ordinance, the following Mitigation Measures are incorporated: NOI-1: Construction Hours. Construction is only allowed between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including Saturdays. Construction is not allowed at any time on Sunday or national holidays. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 73 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact NOI-2: Perimeter Walls. Perimeter walls shall be constructed as soon as is feasible. Most commonly, this can occur after rough grading which will be minimal for this Project since the site is essentially level fand will require minimal grading. The constructed perimeter walls would reduce received noise levels by an estimated by 5 to 8 dBA. NOI-3: Construction Traffic Routing Construction traffic shall be routed from East Avenue onto the proposed `A' Street alignment, which is centrally located with the Project site. This acts to maximize separation between construction traffic movements and potentially affected residential uses, and minimize construction traffic noise received at potentially affected residential uses. NOI-4: Construction Equipment Staging Area. The Project construction equipment staging area shall be centrally located within the Project site. This will maximize the separation between staged construction equipment and potentially affected residential uses, and minimize staged construction equipment noise received at potentially affected residential uses. NOI-5: Noise Complaint Response. Legible, durable, weather-proof signs providing City contact information (e.g., name, phone number, email) for submitting noise concerns/complaints shall be posted along the Project site perimeter. Such signs shall be readily visible from off-site vantages. All submitted complaints/concerns shall receive a response from the designated contact and measures shall be taken to verify received noise levels and to reduce received noise levels. Pursuant to complaint response, if monitored construction-source noise levels at affected receptors exceed the City's 65 dBA (L25)performance standard, construction activities shall be reduced in intensity or shall be otherwise modified to ensure compliance with the City s noise standards. Based on the preceding discussions, and with application of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5, the potential for Project construction-source noise to result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels exceeding City standards is considered less- than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 74 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Project Operational/Area-Source Noise Project operational/area-source noise contributors would include on-site traffic and typical residential noise generators (private outdoor activities, yard maintenance, etc.). Reference noise levels collected for other similar projects indicate that on-site noise stationary/area noise sources would generate noise levels that would not exceed 45 dBA Leq at 50 feet. Maximum allowable residential noise levels are identified at Development Code Section 17.66.050, F. Residential Noise Standards, excerpted below: F. Residential Noise Standards. 1. Table 17.66.050-1 (Residential Noise Limits) includes the maximum noise limits in residential zones. These are the noise limits when measured at the adjacent residential property line (exterior) or within a neighboring home (interior). Table 17.66.050-1 Residential Noise Limits Maximum Allowable Location of Measurement 10 p.m.to 7 a.m. 7 a.m.to 10 p.m. Exterior 60 dBA 65dBA Interior 45 dBA 50dBA Additional: (A) It shall be unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise or to allow the creation of any noise which causes the noise level when measured within any other fully enclosed (windows and doors shut) residential dwelling unit to exceed the interior noise standard in the manner described herein [in the Development Code]. (B) If the intruding noise source is continuous and cannot reasonably be discontinued or stopped for a time period whereby the ambient noise level can be Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 75 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact determined, each of the noise limits above shall be reduced 5 dBA for noise consisting of impulse or simple tone noise. The nearest residential receptor is located approximately 50 feet from potential Project noise sources. Project stationary/area-source noise received at the nearest residential land uses would therefore approximate 45 dBA and would not exceed the City's applicable residential noise exterior noise standards (60 dBA: 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., 65dBA: 7 a.m. to 10 p.m.). Project stationary/area-source noise would therefore not result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of City standards. Potential impacts in these regards are therefore considered less-than-significant. Vehicular-Source Noise Project-generated vehicular noise impacts were assessed by determining the Project's incremental contribution to ambient roadway noise levels. All other factors being equal, the logarithmic nature of the dB scale means that a doubling of the traffic volumes results in a 3.0 dBA increase in noise levels, regardless of the absolute number of vehicles. Similarly, a 20 — 30 percent increase in traffic volumes results in a 1.0 dB increase in noise levels, regardless of the absolute number of vehicles. Relative increases in noise levels resulting from increases in traffic volumes are summarized at Table 13-1. Table 13-1 Relative Increases in Noise Level from Increased Traffic Volumes Increase in Traffic Volume(Percent) *Increase in Traffic Noise(dBA,approx.) 10 0.4 20 0.8 30 1.1 40 1.5 50 1.8 60 2.0 70 2.3 80 2.6 90 2.8 100 3.0 ote:Increase in trattic noise= ogto e ative Irattic Increase);e.g.A I U percent increase in trattic= 1.1 x existing traffic:resulting increase in traffic noise=10*logto 1.1=10*.041=.41dBA;A 100 percent in traffic=2.0 x existing traffic:resulting increase in traffic noise=10*logto 2.0=10*.30=3.0 dBA. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 76 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact The City General Plan EIR indicates that 60 dBA CNEL is the maximum acceptable exterior 24-hour noise condition for single-family residential uses (General Plan EIR, p. 4.12-28). For the purposes of this analysis, if ambient 24-hour noise conditions are below the City residential exterior noise standard of 60 dBA CNEL, and Project vehicular-source noise would result in a perceptible (3.0 dBA) or greater increase in ambient conditions that would cause an exceedance of the 60 dBA CNEL standard, Project vehicular-source noise impacts would be considered potentially significant. If ambient conditions exceed the City 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard, a nominal (1.0 dBA) Project vehicular- source noise contributions to ambient conditions would be considered potentially significant. Traffic along adjacent East Avenue is the dominant source of vehicular-source noise affecting the Project site and vicinity properties. The calculated ambient noise level attributable to traffic along East Avenue is estimated at 59.5 dBA CNEL (Noise Impact Analysis, p.15). Because the ambient condition does not exceed the City's acceptable 60 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard, a Project-related incremental increase in vehicular- source noise of 3.0 dBA or greater that would cause an exceedance of the 60 dBA CNEL standard would be considered potentially significant. The Noise Impact Analysis indicates that traffic volumes along East Avenue adjacent to the Project site total approximately 4,000 vehicles per day (Average Trips per Day, ADT). The Project would generate approximately 163 ADT (Noise Impact Analysis, p.15), or approximately 4 percent of the total daily traffic volumes along East Avenue. The 4 percent increase in daily traffic volumes resulting from the Project would translate The Noise Impact Analysis indicates that Project traffic would contribute only 0.2 dBA CNEL to ambient conditions, with a resulting total received vehicular-source noise level of 59.7 dBA CNEL (Noise Impact Analysis, p. 15). The nominal increase in vehicular- source noise levels (0.2 dBA CNEL) generated by Project traffic would not be perceptible and would not exceed the incremental noise threshold of 3.0 dBA CNEL. Further, the total vehicular-source noise level with the addition of Project vehicular- Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 77 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact source noise (59.7 dBA CNEL) would not exceed the City exterior noise standard of 60 dBA CNEL. Based on the preceding, Project vehicular-source noise would not result in exposure of persons to, or generation of, noise levels in excess of City standards. Potential impacts in these regards are therefore considered less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project does not propose or require uses or activities that would be considered substantive sources of on-going vibration. Temporary vibration that may result from Project construction activities are exempt from Development Code vibration level standards (Development Code Section 17.66.050 D. 4). For the purposes of this analysis, and to substantiate whether the Project would result in "exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels," applicable criteria developed by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) were employed. The Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual indicates that received vibration levels of 0.10 Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) (equal to 0.071 Root Mean Square Amplitude [RMS]) could be strongly perceptible (Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans) September 2013, p. 38). For the purposes of this analysis, received vibration levels exceeding 0.10 PPV (0.071 RMS)would be considered potentially significant. Groundborne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Typical Project construction equipment would generate vibration levels of 0.003 PPV (small bulldozer) to 0.089 PPV (larger bulldozer) as measured at 25 feet. As with received noise levels, received vibration levels attenuate with distance. In general, manmade ground-borne vibrations attenuate rapidly with distance from the source. Heavy construction equipment could temporarily and intermittently operate within 50 feet of the nearest residential land uses (located northerly and westerly of the Project site). However, even at 25 feet, the maximum anticipated received vibration level (0.089 Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 78 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact PPV)would not exceed the 0.10 PPV threshold condition. At distances approximating 50 feet, these vibration levels would be further reduced. Based on the preceding discussions, there is little (if any) potential for the Project to result in or cause exposure of persons to, or generation of, excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise. This potential impact is therefore considered less-than- significant. c) No Impact. Ontario International Airport, the nearest airport/airfield, is located approximately 6.9 miles southwesterly of the Project site. While occasional aircraft overflight may occur, substantive aircraft-related noise would not affect the Project area. Moreover, the Project does not propose activities or uses that would cause or otherwise affect airport-related noise impacts. Based on the preceding, there is no potential for the Project to expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels related to airports or airport activities. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Noise Assessment for East Avenue Homes, City of Rancho Cucamonga (Greve & Associates, LLC) April 30, 2020; (Revised March 4, 2021); Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual (Caltrans) September 2013; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, () O (✓) () either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly(for example,through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, () () (✓) () necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 79 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Official local and regional population projections are predicated upon buildout of the City in accordance with the City General Plan. Single- family residential development proposed by the Project would directly contribute to growth of the City. Notwithstanding, the Project single-family residential land uses and development intensities are consistent with those anticipated under the City General Plan. The Project would therefore not result in population growth beyond that anticipated under the General Plan. Indirect population growth inducement could result from creation of additional jobs and resulting attraction of new residents. Development of the Project site would generate temporary construction jobs. However, the Project does not propose business or commercial uses that would result in substantive permanent new employment opportunities or substantive population growth related to the creation of new jobs. The subject site is currently served by all necessary utilities and services, and creation of entirely new infrastructure systems or development of new services is not required. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to induce substantial population growth in the area is considered less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site is vacant of housing, and does not otherwise involve or propose the displacement of any on-site or offsite housing stock. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere is considered less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 80 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? O O (✓) ( ) c) Schools? O O (✓) ( ) d) Parks? O O (✓) ( ) e) Other public facilities? O O (✓) ( ) Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Fire suppression and emergency response services are provided by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District (Fire District). The Project would incrementally contribute to area-wide demands for fire suppression and emergency response services. However, the context and limited scope of the Project (infill development comprising 17 single-family residential units on 10 acres) would not substantially contribute to demands for fire protection services. As means of offsetting any incremental demands for fire protection services, the Project would be designed and constructed consistent with applicable City and Fire District requirements. Moreover, the Project is required to comply with agency-specific criteria outlined in the Project Conditions of Approval. The Project would comply with these Conditions of Approval and subsequent Fire District requirements that may be identified Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 81 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact through the City's final site plan and plan check/building permit review processes. Compliance with these requirements further reduces potential demands for, and impacts on, fire protection and emergency response services. Additionally, the Project would be required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing fire resistant designs, fire suppression systems, adequate fire access, fire flows, and number and locations of hydrants. In combination, these preventive design measures act to reduce demands for fire protection services and reduce adverse effects of fires. Further, the Applicant would be required to pay City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Impact Fees (DIF), a portion of which would be directed to fire protection services. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of the new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts is considered less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Police protection services for the Project area are provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department under contract to the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project would incrementally contribute to area-wide demands for police protection services. However, the context and limited scope of the Project (infill development comprising 17 single-family residential units on 10 acres) would not substantially contribute to demands for police protection services. As means of offsetting any incremental demands police protection services, the Project would be designed and constructed consistent with applicable City and Sheriff's Department requirements. Moreover, the Project is required to comply with agency- specific criteria outlined in the Project Conditions of Approval. The Project would comply with these Conditions of Approval and subsequent Sheriff's Department requirements that may be identified through the City's final site plan and plan check/building permit review processes. Compliance with these requirements further reduces potential demands for, and impacts on, police protection services. Additionally, Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 82 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact the Applicant would be required to pay City of Rancho Cucamonga DIF, a portion of which would be directed to police protection services. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of the new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts is considered less-than-significant. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Alta Loma School District (Grades K — 8) and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District (Grades 9 — 12), collectively Districts, would accommodate additional school-age populations resulting from the Project. The Project residential uses would increase the student population within the Districts, increasing demands on Districts' facilities. However, the context and limited scope of the Project (infill development comprising 17 single-family residential units on 10 acres) would not substantially contribute to demands for school services. In this latter regard, per the Environmental Information Form, Initial Study Part I there would be approximately 14 school-age children (6 elementary, 4 junior high, 4 senior high)residing within the Project. Incremental demands on school facilities attributable to development projects are addressed through mandated payment of school fees. The Project Applicant would pay requisite school fees, offsetting the Project-related demands on school facilities. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of the new or physically altered school facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts is considered less-than-significant. d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project residential uses would result in increased resident populations and associated increased demands for parks facilities. However, the context and limited scope of the Project (infill development comprising 17 single-family residential units on 10 acres) would not substantially contribute to demands for parks Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 83 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact facilities. Park facilities demands are offset through mandated payment of the City DIF, a portion of which would be directed to parks facilities. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of the new or physically altered parks facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts is considered less-than-significant. e) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Development of the Project would require established public agency oversight including, but not limited to, plan check and permitting actions by the City Planning Department, City Engineering Services Department, City Building and Safety Services Department, City Public Works Services Department, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. These actions typically fall within the currently assigned responsibilities of these agencies, and are paid for via plan check and inspection fees assessed of the Project. The context and limited scope of development proposed by the Project (infill residential development [17 dwelling units] within an urban environment that is served by all necessary utilities and public services) indicates that no new or expanded facilities would be required to accommodate oversight or review of the Project. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of the new or physically altered "other" public facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts is considered less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 84 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 16. RECREATION. Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional O O (✓) () parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or O O (✓) () expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Comments: a, b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project residential uses would result in increased resident populations and associated increased demands for neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities. However, the context and limited scope of the Project (infill development comprising 17 single-family residential units on 10 acres) would not substantially contribute to demands for recreational services. Parks and recreation services demands are offset through mandated payment of the City DIF, a portion of which would be directed to parks and recreational facilities. The City would assign fees assessed of the Project to park and recreation improvements consistent with demonstrated demands and pursuant to the City Park/Recreation Improvements Program(s), acting to ensure that increased use of parks and recreational facilities attributable to the Project resident population would not result in substantial physical deterioration facilities. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur; or to include or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment is less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting)February 16, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 85 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy O O (✓) () addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway,bicycle and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines§ O O (✓) () 15064.3,subdivision(b)? c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design O O (✓) () feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? O O (✓) ( ) Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project proposes development of conventional single- family residential uses. The Project does not propose elements or aspects that would inherently conflict with conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Development of the City pursuant to the General Plan is reflected in Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) planning efforts and policies including: The 2016- 2040 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCAG) April 2016. The Project is consistent with the General Plan and by extension is reflected in SCAG planning efforts and policies. The Project is consistent with the Specific Plan and would be required to comply with Specific Plan circulation system design and development standards. All Project circulation system improvements including roadways, sidewalks, and trails would be designed and constructed consistent with Specific Plan and City standards. On a long-term basis, the Project may result in increased demand for public transportation as residences are developed and occupied. Serving transit agencies (in this case, Omnitrans) routinely review and adjust their ridership schedules to accommodate public demand. The need for transit-related facilities, including but not limited to bus shelters and bicycle parking, would be coordinated between the City and the Project Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 86 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Applicant, with input from transit providers as applicable, as part of the City's standard development review process. Pedestrian walkways would be provided within the Project site with connections to existing and future walkways along adjacent East Avenue. The Project would facilitate and would not obstruct City goals and policies to provide efficient and safe pedestrian access. Based on the preceding discussions, the potential for the Project to conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway,bicycle and pedestrian facilities is less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines §15064.3, subdivision (b) specifies Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as the metric to be employed by lead agencies in the evaluation of transportation impacts. Per the City of Rancho Cucamonga VMT screening criteria, a proposed project generating fewer than 250 average daily trips (ADT) is presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact (City Resolution No. 2020-056, adopted June 17, 2020). Project-generated VMT is summarized at Table 17-1. Table 17-1 Project Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Quantity Units In Out Total In Out Total Daily Single Family Residential- 17 DU 3 9 12 11 6 17 163 ITE Land Use Code 210 Notes: Trip Generation Source:Institute of Transportation Engineers(ITE),Trip Generation Manual,Tenth Edition(2017). DU=Dwelling Units As summarized at Table 17-1, the Project would generate 160 ADT. Per City VMT screening criteria, Project VMT impacts would therefore be less-than-significant. On this basis, the potential for the Project to conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines § 15064.3, subdivision(b) is less-than-significant. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 87 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact c, d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project does not propose or require elements or aspects that would intrinsically increase transportation/traffic hazards or restrict emergency access. In conjunction with the approval of building permits, the City would review all Project designs and plans to assure compliance with applicable emergency access and safety requirements and thereby preclude or resolve any potential emergency access concerns. The potential for the Project to substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or result in inadequate emergency access is therefore less-than-significant. Please refer also to related discussions at Checklist Item 9. Hazards and Hazardous Materials, f) [potential to] Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; City Resolution No. 2020-056, adopted June 17, 2020; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of (✓) Historical Resources,or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k),or b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and (� (� (✓� supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.L In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 88 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Comments: a, b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Within the Project site, there are no known Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) or other resources that are listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined at Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k). Nor does the Project propose or require uses or activities that would adversely affect off-site TCRs. Tribal Resources Consultation (Consultation) with requesting Tribes has been initiated as provided for under AB 52, Gatto. Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act. Consultation documentation is provided at MND Appendix J. Pursuant to the Consultation process, if potentially significant impacts to TCRs are identified, the City and affected Tribe(s) will mutually agree to measures that would avoid or mitigate these impacts. Alternatively, affected parties acting good faith and after reasonable effort, may conclude that a mutual agreement cannot be reached. Protective Mitigation Measures developed in consultation with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians have been incorporated in this IS/MND. These measures that would act to avoid or minimize potential impacts to cultural resources and TCRs. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource as defined at Public Resources Code 21074 is less-than-significant. Please refer also to Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-5. Sources: AB 52, Gatto. Native Americans: California Environmental Quality Act; Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 89 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage,electric power,natural gas,or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project O O (✓) () and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal,dry and multiple dry years? c) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment O O (✓) ( ) provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? d) Generate solid waste in excess of state or local standards,or O O (✓) () in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure,or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and O O (✓) () reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Water Treatment/Water Service The Project would implement conventional single-family residential development (17 dwelling units), and does not propose or require water treatment or water delivery facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. Water service is currently provided to the Project site by the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD, District). All CVWD water is treated consistent with State and federal requirements ensuring its safety and potability. Three(3)plants provide water treatment for CVWD service area customers: • Arthur H. Bridge Treatment Plant; • Royer-Nesbit Treatment Plant; and Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 90 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact • Lloyd W. Michael Treatment Plant. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential uses. The Project residential uses require no additional treatment beyond that currently provided by CVWD. Water service and connection fees paid by the Project and other water customers act to fund area water treatment facilities. All Project water system improvements would be development-specific and localized to the Project area. The environmental effects of Project water system improvements are reflected in and included in evaluation of other environmental impacts addressed in this IS/MND. These impacts are substantiated to be less-than-significant or less-than- significant as mitigated. Wastewater Treatment/Wastewater Conveyance The Project would implement conventional single-family residential development (17 dwelling units), and does not propose or require wastewater treatment or wastewater conveyance facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. Wastewater conveyance facilities are provided by the City and CVWD, with wastewater treatment services by the IEUA. The Project would pay sewer connection and service fees, which act to fund City, CVWD, and IEUA improvement plans, operations, and maintenance. The IEUA, as a regional wastewater treatment provider, would determine when and in what manner treatment facilities will be constructed and/or upgraded to meet increasing demands of area-wide development, including the incremental demands of the Project. All Project wastewater system improvements would be development-specific and localized to the Project area. The environmental effects of Project wastewater system improvements are reflected in and included in evaluation of other environmental impacts addressed in this IS/MND. These impacts are substantiated to be less-than-significant or less-than-significant as mitigated. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 91 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Stormwater Management The Project does not propose or require stormwater management system facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. As proposed under the Project stormwater management concept, developed stormwaters within the Project site would be directed easterly via Project "A" Street to a catch basin located at the easterly cul-de-sac terminus of Street A. Stormwaters collected at the catch basin will be conveyed easterly via a new storm drain constructed as part of the Project. This new storm drain will connect easterly to the existing 24-inch storm located in Golden Lock Place. Prior to discharge from the Project site, the Design Capture Volume (DCV, the quantity of stormwater required to be captured and treated on-site) will be diverted to an underground stormwater biotreatment and infiltration BMP that would be constructed in the easterly portion of the Project site. The Project water quality/infiltration system would be designed to capture and treat the stormwater discharge DCV consistent with City and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board(SARWQCB) requirements. A second drain system would intercept and convey off-site storm flows entering the Project site from the north, and stormwater discharges from the natural habitat area along the easterly Project site boundary. These stormwaters will be conveyed via a proposed parkway drain onto Golden Lock Place. A total of four existing W=28' catch basins about 370' downstream along Golden Lock Place will intercept these storm flows. The Project water quality/infiltration system would be designed to capture and treat the stormwater discharge DCV consistent with City and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board(SARWQCB)requirements. All Project stormwater management systems and improvements would be development- specific and localized to the Project area. The environmental effects of Project stormwater management system improvements are reflected in and included in evaluation of other environmental impacts addressed in this IS/MND. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 92 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Electric Power,Natural Gas, Telecommunications Facilities The Project site and surrounding areas are currently served by electric power, natural gas, telecommunications services. The Project would connect to these locally available services. All related Project improvements would be development-specific and localized to the Project area. The environmental effects of these Project improvements are reflected in and included in evaluation of other environmental impacts addressed in this IS/MND. These impacts are substantiated to be less-than-significant or less-than-significant as mitigated. b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. Estimated water demands of the Project is 11,985 gal/day (Environmental Information Form, Initial Study Part I). The 2015 Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD, District) Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) comprehensively addresses water demand and supply throughout the District's service area, including the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Development proposed by the Project is consistent with residential development of the area envisioned under the UWMP. As documented within the UWMP, water supplies available to District customers are sufficient to meet all existing demands, and anticipated future demands (including the Project's demands) under normal, single-dry year, and extended drought conditions for the 20-year time frame evaluated in the UWMP (UWMP Chapter Six — Water Supply Reliability Assessment). Even in the event of water supply shortages or water emergencies, the District has in place water shortage contingency plans which ensure provision of priority water services to all its existing and anticipated customers, including the Project(UWMP Chapter Seven— Water Shortage Contingency Plan). Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to require new or expanded water supply entitlements is less-than-significant. c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project would generate additional demands for wastewater treatment services. Based on planning factors attached to the City's Environmental Information Form, single-family residential uses are anticipated to generate approximately 270 gallons of wastewater per day/dwelling unit (Environmental Information Form Attachment A, Estimated Water Use and Sewer Flows for New Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 93 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Development). The Project, at 17 single-family dwelling units, would therefore generate an estimated 4,590 gallons of wastewater per day. This wastewater volume is accounted for and reflected in current and programmed IEUA wastewater treatment facilities planning. That is, IEUA wastewater treatment facilities construction and planning reflects development of the City pursuant to the City General Plan. Because the Project land uses and development intensities are consistent with the General Plan, the Project's incremental wastewater treatment demands are reflected in IEUA current and planned wastewater treatment facilities improvements. Further, the General Plan EIR determined that wastewater treatment demands associated with the buildout of the General Plan would be less-than-significant (General Plan EIR p., 4.17-20). The wastewater increment generated by the Project is reflected in that determination. The potential for the Project to exceed current or anticipated wastewater treatment capacities is therefore considered less-than-significant. d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Mid-Valley Landfill (Landfill) is the anticipated primary destination of Project-generated solid waste that is not otherwise diverted or recycled. The Landfill has a daily maximum throughput of 7,500 tons per day, with a remaining capacity of 61,219,377 cubic yards (remaining capacity date 06/30/2019). Maximum permitted capacity of the Landfill is 101,300,000 cubic yards. The Landfill encompasses a total 498 acres, of which 408 acres are designated for waste disposal. The projected closure date of the Landfill is April 1, 2045 (CalRecycle "SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details"). Solid waste collection and transport services within the City are provided by Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc. To establish a likely maximum Project impact scenario, a baseline solid waste generation planning factor of 12.23 lbs./household/day has been utilized in this analysis. In this regard, a range of residential waste generation planning factors and rates are published by CalRecycle (CalRecycle, "Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates"). The rate of 12.23 lbs./household/day employed here represents the most recent and upper end single-family residential waste generation rate within the range of estimates provided by CalRecycle. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 94 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact At a generation rate of 12.23 lbs./household/day, at full occupancy the 17 dwelling units proposed by the Project would generate approximately 210 pounds (0.11 tons) of solid waste per day. This represents 0.0015 percent (0.000015) of the Mid-Valley Landfill (Landfill) maximum allowable daily throughput of 7,500 tons. On a yearly basis, the Project would generate approximately 95.8 cubic yards of solid waste (household trash = approximately 800 lbs./cubic yard), or approximately 0.00016 percent (0.0000016) of the Landfill remaining capacity of 61,219,377 cubic yards. Assuming the above waste generation rate (12.23 lbs./household/day), the Project's incremental solid waste management demands would not be substantial in the context of the Landfill's allowed daily throughput, or in relation to the Landfill's available capacity. Moreover, the Project land uses and development intensities are consistent with that anticipated under the City General Plan. The solid waste increment generated by the Project is reflected in the General Plan EIR determination that solid waste management impacts resulting from buildout of the City would be less-than-significant (General Plan EIR, p. 4.17-22). Further reducing potential solid waste management impacts, the Project would be required to comply with construction and demolition debris reduction, disposal and recycling measures implemented under the California Green Building Code (CALGreen). Specifically, CALGreen Section 5.408.1 requires recycling and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65 percent of nonhazardous construction and demolition waste . . . or compliance with a local construction and demolition waste management ordinance, whichever is more stringent. Pursuant to CALGreen Section 5.408.1.1, the Project Applicant would be required to develop and implement a Construction Waste Management Plan demonstrating compliance with state and City recycling/reuse performance standards. In support of CALGreen requirements, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Construction and Demolition Diversion Program, requires Permit applicants for new construction or tenant improvements to submit a deposit before a building and/or demolition permit is issued if the project is valued over $100,000. Deposits are reimbursable if applicants provide proof that at least 65% of the waste was diverted from landfill disposal. Documentation that at Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 95 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact least 65% of the total waste generated was diverted from the landfill by recycling or reuse is required. Acceptable documentation consists of weight tickets or other records of measurement from recycling facilities,processors, transfers stations, and landfills. Weight tickets must have the following information: • Disposal Date; • Disposal Business Name; • Material Type; • Net Weight; • Weight Ticket Number; and • City of Origin: This must be Rancho Cucamonga. See also: http://cityofrcdev.prod.acquia-sites.com/construction- development/construction-and-demolition-diversion-pro rg am. Based on the preceding, Project-generated solid waste can be accommodated at the receiving Mid-Valley Landfill; and there is available throughput capacity to serve the Project and other customers. Solid waste diversion achieved pursuant to existing regulations would further reduce potential Project impacts affecting area landfills. The Project would implement a Construction and Demolition (C&D) program further reducing potential Project solid waste management impacts. On this basis, the potential for Project solid waste to exceed the permitted capacity of receiving landfills is less-than- significant. e) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The City has implemented programs to ensure compliance with statewide solid waste source reduction targets of 50 percent or more. The Project would comply with applicable City and state waste diversion and recycling mandates. Moreover, the Project would implement conventional urban residential uses and would not establish uses or activities that would conflict with or obstruct local, State and federal solid waste management regulations. All solid waste generated by the Project would be collected and disposed of as part of the City's municipal waste stream. In this latter regard, solid waste management services are provided throughout the City including Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 96 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact collection and transfer of refuse, greenwaste, and bulky items. Recycling services are also provided. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to conflict with or obstruct federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste is less-than-significant. Sources: Rancho Cucamonga General Plan, May 19, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Cal Recycle; 2015 Cucamonga Valley Water District Urban Water Management Plan; CalRecycle. "SWIS Facility/Site Activity Details." CalRecycle, www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteActivity/Details/1880?siteID=2662. Accessed 3 Mar. 2021; CalRecycle. "Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates." CalRecycle, www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. Accessed 3 Mar. 2021; Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. 20. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity () (� (10 () zones, Would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, ( ) O (✓) ( ) exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated ( ) O (✓) ( ) infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including O O (✓) () downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,post-fire slope instability,or drainage changes? Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 97 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Comments: The Project site is located within an area designated by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District (RCFD) as "High Fire Hazard" (Rancho Cucamonga Fire District "Fire Hazard Property Lookup"). a) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential uses (17 dwelling units) in an area of the City that is developed with similar urban residential uses. The Project site abuts and is provided direct access to improved and City-maintained East Avenue. Access to the developed Project would be provided consistent with City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire District requirements. There are no adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans that would be adversely affected by the Project. Additionally, the Project would implement fire hazard protection and suppression measures stipulated by the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District through the Project Conditions of Approval. In this latter regard, the Project would be required to comply with and implement the following: • Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. • A site-specific or project-specific protection plan shall be prepared for the Project. The Project fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The above or similar language is required to be incorporated in Project plans. The City and Fire District would ensure compliance with the above Conditions of Approval through standard site plan/building permit review processes. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan is less-than-significant. Please refer also to related discussions presented at Checklist Item 9. (g). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 98 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact b) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site slopes gradually (approximately 1.3 percent) downward from west to east. There are no prevailing conditions (slope, winds, and other factors) that would exacerbate wildfire risks and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. Additionally, the Project would implement fire hazard protection and suppression measures stipulated by the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District through the Project Conditions of Approval. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to expose Project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire is less-than-significant. Please refer also to related discussions presented at Checklist Item 9. (g). c) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project proposes conventional single-family residential uses (17 dwelling units) in an area of the City that is developed with similar urban residential uses. The Project site abuts and is provided direct access to improved and City-maintained East Avenue. Access to the Project would be provided consistent with City and Rancho Cucamonga Fire District requirements. All utilities and services are currently available to the Project site. The Project does not propose or require the installation or maintenance of infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. Potential Project impacts associated with localized infrastructure improvements and connections to utilities and services is addressed under relevant topical issues within this IS/MND. The Project does not propose or require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. Impacts in these regards are therefore less-than-significant. Please refer also to related discussions presented at Checklist Item 9. (g). d) Less-Than-Significant Impact. The Project site is generally level without significant gradients. The Project site slopes gradually (approximately 1.3 percent) downward from west to east. Adjacent properties evidence similar gradual slopes. The Project site is not Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 99 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact considered susceptible to static slope instability or seismically induced landslides (Project Geotechnical Investigation, p. 10). The Project site and surrounding properties lie with an area designated as "Moderate Flood Hazard Area" (500-year floodplain), but are not subject to substantial (100-year) flood hazards (City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan EIR, Exhibit 4.9-3 Flood Hazard Zones). The Project stormwater management concept maintains prevailing west-to-east drainage patterns. These patterns would not be affected by wildfires or wildfire prevention/suppression measures. All Project storm management system improvements would be subject to City review and approval. Additionally, the Project would implement fire hazard protection and suppression measures stipulated by the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District through the Project Conditions of Approval. Based on the preceding, the potential for the Project to expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff,post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes is less-than-significant. Please refer also to related discussions presented at Checklist Item 9. (g). Sources: Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update, Draft Program Environmental Impact Report, SCH No. 2000061027 (BonTerra Consulting) February 16, 2010; Rancho Cucamonga Fire District. Fire Hazard Property Lookup, 3 Mar. 2021, https://re ig�s mamaps.arcgis.com/apps/webgppviewer/index.html?id=fae4l30265364768849f9Ocf3O 9ea6ae (Fire Hazard information for APN 0225-191-06); Preliminary Plans for the East Avenue Residential Project. Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 100 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade O (✓) O () the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, O (✓) O () but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects,and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will O (✓) O () cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: a) Less-Than-Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Certain biological resources described at Initial Study Checklist Item 4. Biological Resources may be adversely affected by the Project. Additionally, as yet unknown cultural resources, and as yet unknown paleontological resources could be affected by the Project. This IS/MND incorporates mitigation that reduces potential biological resources impacts, potential cultural resources impacts, and potential paleontological resources impacts to levels that would be less-than-significant. See: Mitigation Measures BIO-1, CR-1 through CR-5, GEO-1. On this basis, within the application of mitigation, the Potential for the Project to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory would be less-than-significant. b) Less-Than-Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As substantiated herein, no significant or potentially significant unmitigable long-term environmental effects of the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Rancho Cucamonga East Avenue Residential Project Page 101 SUBTT20334 Less Than Potentially Significant Less Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Significant with Than No Impact Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact Project have been identified. Mitigation measures identified in this IS/MND reduce all potentially significant impacts to levels that would be less-than-significant. See: Mitigation Measures AQ-1, 13I0-1, CR-1 through CR-5, GEO-1,NOI-1 through NOI-5. There are no known past, current, or probable future related projects that would interact with the Project and thereby result in cumulatively considerable impacts. The Project's mitigated impacts are therefore individually limited and are not cumulatively considerable. On this basis, with the application of mitigation, the Project would not result in impacts that are individually limited,but cumulatively considerable. c) Less-Than-Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. As substantiated herein, all Project environmental impacts would be less-than-significant or would be or less-than-significant as mitigated. The Project would therefore not result in environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. APPLICANT CERTIFICATION I certify that I am the applicant for the project described in this Initial Study. I acknowledge that I have read this Initial Study and the proposed mitigation measures. Further, I have revised the project plans or proposals and/or hereby agree to the proposed mitigation measures to avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant environmental effects would occur. Applicant's Signature: Date: Print Name and Title: Part III : Mitigation Monitoring Program City of Rancho Cucamonga MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM Project File No.: SUBTT20334 This Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared for use in implementing the mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the above-listed project. This program has been prepared in compliance with State law to ensure that adopted mitigation measures are implemented (Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). Program Components - This MMP contains the following elements: 1. Conditions of approval that act as impact mitigation measures are recorded with the action and the procedure necessary to ensure compliance. The mitigation measure conditions of approval are contained in the adopted Resolution of Approval for the project. 2. A procedure of compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3. The MMP has been designed to provide focused, yet flexible guidelines. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the program. Program Management - The MMP will be in place through all phases of the project. The project planner, assigned by the Planning Director, shall coordinate enforcement of the MMP. The project planner oversees the MMP and reviews the Reporting Forms to ensure they are filled out correctly and proper action is taken on each mitigation. Each City department shall ensure compliance of the conditions (mitigation) that relate to that department. Procedures - The following steps will be followed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 1. A fee covering all costs and expenses, including any consultants' fees, incurred by the City in performing monitoring or reporting programs shall be charged to the applicant. 2. A MMP Reporting Form will be prepared for each potentially significant impact and its corresponding mitigation measure identified in the Mitigation Monitoring Checklist, attached hereto. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. All monitoring and reporting documentation will be kept in the project file with the department having the original authority for processing the project. Reports will be available from the City upon request at the following address: City of Rancho Cucamonga - Lead Agency Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project Page 2 3. Appropriate specialists will be retained if technical expertise beyond the City staffs is needed, as determined by the project planner or responsible City department, to monitor specific mitigation activities and provide appropriate written approvals to the project planner. 4. The project planner or responsible City department will approve, by signature and date, the completion of each action item that was identified on the MMP Reporting Form. After each measure is verified for compliance, no further action is required for the specific phase of development. 5. All MMP Reporting Forms for an impact issue requiring no further monitoring will be signed off as completed by the project planner or responsible City department at the bottom of the MMP Reporting Form. 6. Unanticipated circumstances may arise requiring the refinement or addition of mitigation measures. The project planner is responsible for approving any such refinements or additions. An MMP Reporting Form will be completed by the project planner or responsible City department and a copy provided to the appropriate design, construction, or operational personnel. 7. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to stop the work of construction contractors if compliance with any aspects of the MMP is not occurring after written notification has been issued. The project planner or responsible City department also has the authority to hold certificates of occupancies if compliance with a mitigation measure attached hereto is not occurring. The project planner or responsible City department has the authority to hold issuance of a business license until all mitigation measures are implemented. 8. Any conditions (mitigation) that require monitoring after project completion shall be the responsibility of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The Department shall require the applicant to post any necessary funds (or other forms of guarantee) with the City. These funds shall be used by the City to retain consultants and/or pay for City staff time to monitor and report on the mitigation measure for the required period of time. 9. In those instances requiring long-term project monitoring, the applicant shall provide the City with a plan for monitoring the mitigation activities at the project site and reporting the monitoring results to the City. Said plan shall identify the reporter as an individual qualified to know whether the particular mitigation measure has been implemented. The monitoring/reporting plan shall conform to the City's MMP and shall be approved by the Community Development Director or Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance Aesthetics No mitigation is necessary. Agricultural Resources No mitigation is necessary. Air Quality AQ-1: During grading activities, unstabilized BO C Throughout site disturbing A 4 disturbed areas shall be watered a minimum activities. of three times per day. Biological Resources BI0-1 — Applicant shall designate a biologist PD/BO B/C Pre-construction survey to AID 2/4 (Project biologist) experienced in: identifying be completed within 3 days local and migratory bird species; conducting prior to any site disturbing bird surveys using appropriate survey activities. methodology; surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, Pre-construction survey locating nests and breeding territories, and documentation to be identifying nesting stages and nest success; submitted prior to issuance determining/establishing appropriate of grading permit. avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented Active nest monitoring and avoidance and minimization measures. The protection (if required) Project biologist shall conduct a pre- throughout site disturbing construction clearance survey for nesting activities. birds at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions, within Final monitoring report (if 3 days of the start of any vegetation removal required) to be completed or ground disturbing activities. The purpose of and submitted to the City the survey is to identify any nesting birds that within 60 days of may be present and to ensure that no nesting completion of site disturbing birds will be disturbed during Project activities and prior to vegetation removal or ground disturbing issuance of building Page 3 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Mitigation Monitoring Pro ram Initial Study Part III activities. Surveys shall encompass all permits. suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate. The Project biologist shall document negative survey results with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is encountered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall be excluded from a defined `no-disturbance buffer area." The size and configuration of the no-disturbance buffer area will be determined by the Project biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical conditions. The Project biologist will evaluate these factors in context when developing the no-disturbance buffer area. Limits of the no- disturbance buffer area shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas and to avoid the designated no- disturbance buffer area. The Project biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor any active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction Page 4 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Mitigation Monitoring Pro ram Initial Study Part III activities within the no-disturbance buffer area may proceed. At the conclusion of monitoring activities, the Project Biological Monitor shall prepare a final report documenting monitoring activities, monitoring results, and any onsite mitigation actions. Page 5 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance B10-2 —Within 12 months prior to the start of PD/BO B/C Pre-construction trapping to D 2/4 Project activities, Applicant shall conduct be completed 12 months small mammal trapping for SBKR within the prior to any site disturbing Project area. Results of trapping surveys shall activities. be provided to CDFW. If SBKR are present, Applicant shall apply for an Incidental Take Trapping results Permit with CDFW prior to conducting Project documentation to be activities and shall mitigate for the loss of submitted prior to issuance occupied habitat through the purchase of of grading permit. CDFW-approved mitigation bank credits at a level deemed appropriate by CDFW, and no less than a ratio of 2:1. Page 6 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Mitigation Monitoring Pro ram Initial Study Part III BI0-3 - Within 30 days prior to commencement PD/BO B/C Pre-construction survey to D 2A of vegetation or structure removal activities, a be completed within 3 0 re-construction bat survey shall be conducteddays prior t any site disturbing activities. by a qualified biologist for the presence of any roosting bats. If either a bat maternity roost or Pre-construction survey hibernacula (structures used by bats for documentation to be hibernation) are present, a qualified biologist submitted prior to issuance of grading permit. will develop and implement appropriate protection measures for that maternity roost or Active nest monitoring and hibernacula. protection (if required) throughout site disturbing activities. Final monitoring report (if required) to be completed and submitted to the City within 60 days of completion of site disturbing activities and prior to issuance of building permits. Cultural/Tribal Resources CR-1 In the event that cultural resources PD C Resources monitoring and A 4 are discovered during project activities, all protection throughout site- work in the immediate vicinity of the find disturbing activities. Page 7 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within MM CR-4, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. CR-2 If significant pre-contact and/or historic- PD C Resources monitoring and A 4 era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA protection throughout site- (as amended, 2015), are discovered and disturbing activities. avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within CR-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the Project development activities and shall implement the Plan accordingly. CR-3 If human remains or funerary objects PD C Resources monitoring and A 4 are encountered during any activities protection throughout site- associated with the Project development, work disturbing activities. in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Page 8 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of Project development activities. CR-4 The San Manuel Band of Mission PD C Resources monitoring and A 4 Indians Cultural Resources Department protection throughout site- (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed inCR- disturbing activities. 1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. CR-5 Any and all archaeological/cultural PD D Documentation to be D 2 documents created as a part of the project submitted within 60 days of (isolate records, site records, survey reports, completion of site disturbing testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the activities and prior to applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination issuance of building to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant permits. shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. Energy No mitigation is necessary. Page 9 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance Geology and Soils GEO-1 If potential paleontological resources PD C/D Resources monitoring and AID 2/4 (i.e. plant or animal fossils) are encountered protection throughout site- before or during grading, the developer will disturbing activities. retain a qualified paleontologist to monitor construction activities, to take appropriate Documentation to be measures to protect or preserve them for submitted within 60 days of study. The paleontologist shall submit a report completion of site disturbing of findings that will also provide specific activities and prior to recommendations regarding further mitigation issuance of building measures (i.e., paleontological monitoring) permits. that may be appropriate. Where mitigation monitoring is appropriate, the program shall include, but not be limited to, the following measures: • Assign a paleontological monitor, trained and equipped to allow the rapid removal of fossils with minimal construction delay, to the site full-time during the interval of earth-disturbing activities. • Should fossils be found within an area being cleared or graded, divert earth- disturbing activities elsewhere until the monitor has completed salvage. If construction personnel make the discovery, the grading contractor shall immediately divert construction and notify the monitor of the find. • Prepare, identify, and curate all recovered fossils for documentation in the Page 10 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance summary report and transfer to an appropriate depository (i.e., San Bernardino County Museum). • Submit summary report to City of Rancho Cucamonga. Transfer collected specimens with a copy to the report to San Bernardino County Museum. Greenhouse Gas Emissions No mitigation is necessary. Hazards and Waste Materials No mitigation is necessary. Hydrology and Water Quality No mitigation is necessary. Land Use and Planning No mitigation is necessary. Mineral Resources No mitigation is necessary. Noise N0I-1 Construction Hours. Construction is BO C Compliance with the A 4 only allowed between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. construction day/hour on weekdays, including Saturdays. limitations verified Construction is not allowed at any time on throughout construction Sunday or national holidays. activities. N0I-2 Perimeter Walls. Perimeter walls shall BO B Verify perimeter walls A 2/4 be constructed as soon as is feasible. Most subsequent to rough Page 11 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance commonly, this can occur after rough grading grading and prior to which will be minimal for this Project since the issuance of building site is essentially level and will require minimal permit(s). subsequent grading. The constructed perimeter walls would reduce received noise levels by an estimated by 5 to 8 dBA. N0I-3 Construction Traffic Routing. PD/BO B/C Construction Traffic Routing A/C 2/4 Construction traffic shall be routed from East Plan (Plan) to be approved Avenue onto the proposed A' Street by the City approval prior to alignment, which is centrally located with the issuance of the first grading Project site. This acts to maximize separation permit. between construction traffic movements and potentially affected residential uses, and Compliance with the Plan minimize construction traffic noise received at verified throughout potentially affected residential uses. construction activities. N0I-4 Construction Equipment Staging Area. BO C Monitoring and reporting A 4 The Project construction equipment staging throughout site-disturbing area shall be centrally located within the activities. Project site. This will maximize the separation between staged construction equipment and potentially affected residential uses, and minimize staged construction equipment noise received at potentially affected residential uses. N0I-5 Noise Complaint Response. Legible, PD/BO C Monitoring and reporting A 4 durable, weather-proof signs providing City throughout site-disturbing contact information (e.g., name, phone activities. number, email) for submitting noise concerns/complaints shall be posted along the Project site perimeter. Such signs shall be readily visible from off-site vantages. All submitted complaints/concerns shall receive a Page 12 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Miticiation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designee(s)is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance response from the designated contact and measures shall be taken to verify received noise levels and to reduce received noise levels. Pursuant to complaint response, if monitored construction-source noise levels at affected receptors exceed the City's 65 dBA (L25) performance standard, construction activities shall be reduced in intensity or shall be otherwise modified to ensure compliance with the City's noise standards. Population and Housing No mitigation is necessary. Public Services No mitigation is necessary. Recreation No mitigation is necessary. Transportation/Traffic No mitigation is necessary. Tribal Cultural Resources See MM CR-1 through CR-5 Utilities and Service Systems No mitigation is necessary. Wildfire No mitigation is necessary. Page 13 Mitigation Monitoring Program East Avenue Residential Project (SUBTT20334) Table III-1 Mitigation Monitoring Program Initial Study Part III General Note: To facilitate coordination and effective implementation of mitigation measures, the mitigation measures provided herein shall appear on all grading plans, construction specifications, and bid documents. Incorporation of required notations shall be verified by the City prior to issuance of first development permit. Unless otherwise specified, the Applicant or Applicant designees is/are responsible for implementation of and compliance with all mitigation measures. Mitigation Measure Responsible Frequency Timing of Verification Method of Date Sanctions for for Verification Verified/ Non- Monitoring Initials Compliance Key to Checklist Abbreviations Responsible Person Monitoring Frequency Method of Verification Sanctions CDD—Community Development A—With Each New Development A—Onsite Inspection 1 —Withhold Recordation of Final Director or designee Map PD— Planning Director or designee B— Prior to Construction B—Other Agency Permit/Approval 2—Withhold Grading or Building Permit CE—City Engineer or designee C—Throughout Construction C— Plan Check 3—Withhold Certificate of Occupancy BO— Building Official or designee D—On Completion D—Separate Submittal 4—Stop Work Order (Reports/Studies/Plans PO—Police Captain or designee E- Operating 5—Retain Deposit or Bonds FC— Fire Chief or designee 6— Revoke CUP 7—Citation Page 14 Appendices Please refer to the accompanying CD. �. State of California—Natural Resources Agency GAVINNEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Inland Deserts Region 3602 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite C-220 Ontario, CA 91764 www.wildlife.ca.gov Governor's Office of Planning&Research April 21, 2021 Apr 212021 Tabe van der Zwaag STATE CLEARINGHOUSE City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91729 Subject: East Avenue 17 Project Mitigated Negative Declaration 2021030567 Dear Tabe van der Zwaag: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) received a Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) from the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City; Lead Agency) for the East Avenue 17 Project (Project) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and CEQA Guidelines.' Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments and recommendations regarding those activities involved in the Project that may affect California fish and wildlife. Likewise, we appreciate the opportunity to provide comments regarding those aspects of the Project that CDFW, by law, may be required to carry out or approve through the exercise of its own regulatory authority under the Fish and Game Code. CDFW ROLE CDFW is California's Trustee Agency for fish and wildlife resources and holds those resources in trust by statute for all the people of the State. (Fish & G. Code, §§ 711.7, subd. (a) & 1802; Pub. Resources Code, § 21070; CEQA Guidelines § 15386, subd. (a).) CDFW, in its trustee capacity, has jurisdiction over the conservation, protection, and management of fish, wildlife, native plants, and habitat necessary for biologically sustainable populations of those species. (1d., § 1802.) Similarly, for purposes of CEQA, CDFW is charged by law to provide, as available, biological expertise during public agency environmental review efforts, focusing specifically on projects and related activities that have the potential to adversely affect fish and wildlife resources. CDFW is also submitting comments as a Responsible Agency under CEQA. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21069; CEQA Guidelines, § 15381.) CDFW expects that it may need to exercise regulatory authority as provided by the Fish and Game Code. As proposed, for example, the Project may be subject to CDFW's lake and streambed alteration regulatory authority. (Fish & G. Code, § 1600 et seq.) Likewise, to the extent 1 CEQA is codified in the California Public Resources Code in section 21000 at seq. The "CEQA Guidelines"are found in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, commencing with section 15000. EXHIBIT F Conserving Caffornia's Wifdffe Since 1870 Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 2 of 9 implementation of the Project as proposed may result in "take' as defined by State law of any species protected under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) (Fish & G. Code, § 2050 et seq.), the Project proponent may seek related take authorization as provided by the Fish and Game Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY The Project is proposing to develop a 21-lot residential subdivision, to include 17 single- family homes and four open space parcels on an approximately 10 acres. COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDFW offers the comments and recommendations below to assist City in adequately identifying and/or mitigating the Project's significant, or potentially significant, direct and indirect impacts on fish and wildlife (biological) resources. CDFW agrees that an MND could be appropriate for the Project with the addition and implementation of specific and enforceable avoidance and minimization measures and compensatory mitigation strategies, including those CDFW recommends within the body of this letter. CEQA requires public agencies in California to analyze and disclose potential environmental impacts associated with a project that the public agency will carry out, fund, or approve. Nesting Birds It is the Project proponent's responsibility to comply with all applicable laws related to nesting birds and birds of prey. Fish and Game Code sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 afford protective measures as follows: Fish and Game Code section 3503 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or needlessly destroy the nest or eggs of any bird, except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation made pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3503.5 makes it unlawful to take, possess, or destroy any birds in the orders Falconiformes or Strigiformes (birds-of-prey) to take, possess, or destroy the nest or eggs of any such bird except as otherwise provided by Fish and Game Code or any regulation adopted pursuant thereto. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by the rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). CDFW appreciates the inclusion of MM 13I0-1, but requests revisions to address species that may nest outside of the specified nesting season and offers additional, detailed language on survey methods, monitoring, and minimization. CDFW recommends 13I0-1 be revised as follows: BI0-1 —Applicant shall designate a biologist (Project biologist) experienced in: identifying local and migratory bird species; conducting bird surveys using appropriate survey methodology; surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 3 of 9 territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures. If^^^"*' ^Ynn .. h^h^i^^^ C^h^iaFy 4 st and August t 31 sr t The Project biologist shall conduct a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions,. The suFvey shall be Gendyeted within 3 days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. The purpose of the survey is to identify any nesting birds that may be present and to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during Project vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate. The Project biologist shall document negative survey results with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is encountered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall be excluded from a defined "no-disturbance buffer area." The size and configuration of the no-disturbance buffer area will be determined by the Project biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical conditions. The Project biologist will evaluate these factors in context when developing the no-disturbance buffer area. Limits of the no-disturbance buffer area shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas and to avoid the designated no-disturbance buffer area. The Project biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor any active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the no-disturbance buffer area may proceed. At the conclusion of monitoring activities, the Project Biological Monitor shall prepare a final report documenting monitoring activities, monitoring results, and any on- site mitigation actions. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat The MND identifies that 1.2 acres of Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub (RAFSS) habitat occurs along the easterly Project site boundary. RAFSS is the habitat predominantly utilized by the San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (SBKR), a federally endangered and state candidate species. The MND states, "an assessment of the existing 1.21 acres of RAFSS habit in the easterly portion of the Project site has been Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 4 of 9 completed... [and] determined that the plant cover from non-native grasses in this 1.21- acre area was-too dense to support San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat." It concludes that the Project site does not provide suitable habitat for SBKR and no further studies are recommended. CDFW disagrees with the presumption that SBKR could not occur onsite due to non- native grass cover. While the habitat is mature, there are two known occurrences of SBKR within half a mile of the Project site (CNDDB, 2021). CDFW is concerned that potential impacts to SBKR are not identified or discussed within the MND. Appropriate analysis would include conducting SBKR trapping sessions within the RAFSS habitat during appropriate periods. Were SBKR to be present onsite, appropriate authorization (e.g., a CESA incidental take permit) should be obtained prior to the initiation of Project activities. Therefore, CDFW recommends the City include the following mitigation measure in the MND. BIO-2 —Within 12 months prior to the start of Project activities, Applicant shall conduct small mammal trapping for SBKR within the Project area. Results of trapping surveys shall be provided to CDFW. If SBKR are present, Applicant shall apply for an Incidental Take Permit with CDFW prior to conducting Project activities and shall mitigate for the loss of occupied habitat through the purchase of CDFW-approved mitigation bank credits at a level deemed appropriate by CDFW, and no less than a ratio of 2:1. Bats The MND states the Project site has "a low potential to support western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus)" but does not provide further analysis of the potential direct, indirect, or cumulative impacts to the species. The MND also identifies that the northerly and southerly boundaries of the Project site are lined with eucalyptus windrows, almost entirely composed of eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), that could provide roosting habitat for the western mastiff bat. CDFW strongly recommends the inclusion of the following mitigation measure before adopting the MND. BIO-3 — No less than 60 days prior to initiating Project activities, the Project biologist shall conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability assessment of any vegetation that may be removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the Project activities.Any locations with potential to support roosting bats shall be surveyed by the Project biologist using an appropriate combination of structure inspection, sampling, exit counts, and acoustic surveys. Surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate time of day/night to ensure detection of bats. The results of the pre-construction bat surveys shall be submitted to CDFW for review no less than 30 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. If the presence of bats within the Project is confirmed, avoidance and minimization measures, including the designation of buffers based upon Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 5 of 9 what bat species are found, and phased removal of trees, shall be developed and submitted to CDFW for review and approval. If the site supports maternity roosts, Applicant shall avoid disturbing those areas during the breeding season and shall compensate for impacts and losses to maternity roosts and/or special-status bat habitat through a mitigation strategy approved by CDFW. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be found at the following link: hftp://www.dfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/pdfs/CNDDB FieldSurveyForm.pdf. The completed form can be mailed electronically to CNDDB at the following email address: CNDDB(@wildlife.ca.gov. The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: hfti)://www.dtg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/plants and animals.asp. FILING FEES The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal. Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.) CONCLUSION CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist the City in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources. The MND includes inadequate survey methods for nesting birds and did not include any survey methods or minimization measure for SBKR and bats, thus did not provide proper analysis that the Project would have less than significant impacts. As such, CDFW recommends the City perform the necessary surveys of the Project site and adopt the recommended measures provided by CDFW prior to adopting the MND. Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Marina Barton, Environmental Scientist at 909-948-9632 or marina.barton@wildlife.ca.gov. Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 6 of 9 Sincerely, Co u9qmdby: Uf lUilse ' 009191N9243F49C... Scott Wilson Environmental Program Manager Attachment ec: Marina Barton, Environmental Scientist, CDFW Inland Deserts Region Marina.Barton@wildlife.ca.gov Office of Planning and Research, State Clearinghouse, Sacramento state.cleari nghou se(cDopr.ca.gov HCPB CEQA Coordinator Habitat Conservation Planning Branch REFERENCES California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) Government [ds45]. 2021. Calif. Dept. of Fish and Wildlife. Biogeographic Information and Observation System. Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 7 of 9 ATTACHMENT1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) PURPOSE OF THE MMRP The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure compliance with mitigation measures during project implementation. Mitigation measures must be implemented within the time periods indicated in the table below. TABLE OF MITIGATION MEASURES The following items are identified for each mitigation measure: Mitigation Measure, Implementation Schedule, and Responsible Party. The Mitigation Measure column summarizes the mitigation requirements. The Implementation Schedule column shows the date or phase when each mitigation measure will be implemented. The Responsible Party column identifies the person or agency that is primarily responsible for implementing the mitigation measure. Mitigation Measure Implementation Responsible Schedule Party BIO-1: Applicant shall designate a biologist Before (Project biologist) experienced in: identifying commencing Project local and migratory bird species; conducting bird ground- or Proponent surveys using appropriate survey methodology; vegetation- surveying techniques, recognizing breeding and disturbing nesting behaviors, locating nests and breeding activities territories, and identifying nesting stages and nest success; determining/establishing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures; and monitoring the efficacy of implemented avoidance and minimization measures. If nnnc;tr„n+inn ArGurs h twee., Feb'F „ '6t and August st 3 st t The Project biologist shall conduct a pre-construction clearance survey for nesting birds at the appropriate time of day/night, during appropriate weather conditions,. T"—r survey shall be GonduGted within 3 days of the start of any vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. The Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 8 of 9 purpose of the survey is to identify any nesting birds that may be present and to ensure that no nesting birds will be disturbed during Project vegetation removal or ground disturbing activities. Surveys shall encompass all suitable areas including trees, shrubs, bare ground, burrows, cavities, and structures. Survey duration shall take into consideration the size of the Project site; density, and complexity of the habitat; number of survey participants; survey techniques employed; and shall be sufficient to ensure the data collected is complete and accurate. The Project biologist shall document negative survey results with a brief letter report indicating that no impacts to active avian nests will occur. If an active avian nest is encountered during the pre-construction clearance survey, construction activities shall be excluded from a defined "no-disturbance buffer area." The size and configuration of the no-disturbance buffer area will be determined by the Project biologist and will depend on the level of noise and/or surrounding anthropogenic disturbances, line of sight between the nest and the construction activity, type and duration of construction activity, ambient noise, species habituation, and topographical conditions. The Project biologist will evaluate these factors in context when developing the no-disturbance buffer area. Limits of the no- disturbance buffer area shall be established in the field with flagging, fencing, or other appropriate barriers. Construction personnel shall be instructed on the sensitivity of nest areas and to avoid the designated no-disturbance buffer area. The Project biologist shall be present to delineate the boundaries of the buffer area and to monitor any active nest to ensure that nesting behavior is not adversely affected by construction activities. Once the young have fledged and left the nest, or the nest otherwise becomes inactive under natural conditions, construction activities within the no-disturbance buffer area may proceed. At the conclusion of monitoring activities, the Project Biological Monitor shall prepare a final report documenting monitoring activities, monitoring results, and any on-site mitigation actions. Tabe van der Zwaag East Avenue 17 Project April 21, 2021 Page 9 of 9 13I0-2—Within 12 months prior to the start of Before Project activities, Applicant shall conduct small commencing Project mammal trapping for SBKR within the Project ground- or Proponent area. Results of trapping surveys shall be vegetation- provided to CDFW. If SBKR are present, Applicant disturbing shall apply for an Incidental Take Permit with activities CDFW prior to conducting Project activities and shall mitigate for the loss of occupied habitat through the purchase of CDFW-approved mitigation bank credits at a level deemed appropriate by CDFW, and no less than a ratio of 2:1. BIO-3 — No less than 60 days prior to initiating Before Project activities, the Project biologist shall commencing Project conduct a bat roosting habitat suitability ground- or Proponent assessment of any vegetation that may be vegetation- removed, altered, or indirectly impacted by the disturbing Project activities. Any locations with potential to activities support roosting bats shall be surveyed by the Project biologist using an appropriate combination of structure inspection, sampling, exit counts, and acoustic surveys. Surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate time of day/night to ensure detection of bats. The results of the pre-construction bat surveys shall be submitted to CDFW for review no less than 30 days prior to the initiation of Project activities. If the presence of bats within the Project is confirmed, avoidance and minimization measures, including the designation of buffers based upon what bat species are found, and phased removal of trees, shall be developed and submitted to CDFW for review and approval. If the site supports maternity roosts, Applicant shall avoid disturbing those areas during the breeding season and shall compensate for impacts and losses to maternity roosts and/or special-status bat habitat through a mitigation strategy approved by CDFW. RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT20334, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF — APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Tentative Tract Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The proposed tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots (A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail)and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the design of the 17 residences on the subject lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140,for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The proposal is to subdivide a property with an area of approximately 10.24 acres of land into seventeen (17) lots for the development of 17 single-family residences. The underlying General Plan designation is Very Low Residential which is intended for the development of single- family residences with an overall density of .01 to 2 dwelling units per acre. The proposed project has a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. C. The proposed subdivision complies with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The proposed development meets all PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 3 standards outlined in the Development Code, the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the design and development standards and policies of the Planning Commission and the City, and d. The proposed development,together with the conditions applicable thereto,will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration,together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment.The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures forthe project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-25 TTM SUBTT20334 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 4 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00139, A REQUEST TO REVIEW THE SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURE OF 17 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES RELATED TO THE SUBDIVISION OF10.24 ACRES OF LAND INTO 17 LOTS FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APNs: 0225-191-09 and - 17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for the issuance of Design Review DRC2020- 00139, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution,the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet(north to south)along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels)are as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 2 Land Use General Zoning Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West I Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* 'Etiwanda Specific Plan & Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The related tentative tract map includes 17 numbered lots and 4 lettered lots. The Lettered Lots (A-D)will be used as open space (including the required equestrian trail) and will be maintained by a Homeowner's Association; and e. The project complies with each of the development standards for the optional development standards of Etiwanda Specific Plan as shown in the table below: Required Proposed Compliant? Density Max 2 DU 1.66 Yes per Acre Street Setback 30 Feet Avg. 30 Feet Avg. Yes Building Separation 30 Feet Min. 30 Feet Yes Private Open Space 25 Percent Min. 25.7 Percent Yes Common Open 65 Percent Min. 67.1 Percent Yes Space Lot Size No Minimum 15,272 to 16,765 Square Ft. Yes* Lot Coverage No Minimum 29.6 Percent Yes *Lots under 20,000 square feet may not keep horses f. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00140, for the removal of up to 129 trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan.The General Plan land use designation is Very Low, which permits the development of single-family residences with a maximum density of 2 units per acre. The project is for the development of single-family residences with a density of 1.66 units per acre; and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is within the Very Low (VL) Residential District The project complies with all the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height.The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit walls up to 8 feet in height; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 3 c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with each of the requirements of the Development Code and the optional standards of the Etiwanda Specific Plan except for wall height. The applicant has submitted a Minor Exception (DRC2020-00141) to permit wall up to 8 feet in height; and d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity.The project site is vacant;the proposed land use is consistent with the land uses within the vicinity where it is located and the expectations of the community. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment.The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with,the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it,finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii)that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-32 DR DRC2020-00139 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 4 Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2020-00140, A REQUEST TO REMOVE UP TO 129 TREES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW(VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT(.1 -2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Tree Removal Permit DRC2020-00040 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tree Removal Permit request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet(east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Zoning Plan PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 2 Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Sin le-F mily Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Sin le-F mily Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The applicant is requesting the removal of up to 129 trees, including live, standing dead, and stumps. An Arborist Report (Jim Borer, March 2, 2021) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees except for four (4) existing street trees should be removed. The Landscape Plan for the project includes the planting of 236 trees including replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and e. This application is in conjunction with Tentative Tract Map SUBTT20334, for the subdivision of 10.24 acres of land in 17 residential lots, Design Review DRC2020-00139, for the construction of 17 single-family residences, and Minor Exception DRC2020-00141, for increased wall heights due to onsite grades. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The removal of the trees is necessary due to the condition of the trees related to disease, danger of collapse, proximity to an existing structure, or interference with utility services; and b. The removal of the trees is necessary in order to construct improvements which will allow economic enjoyment of the property. The seven heritage trees on the project site are in conflict with the proposed development of 17 single-family residences on the project site; and C. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood, the established character of the area, and property values. The removal of the trees will not negatively impact the neighborhood or the character of the area as there are a large number of mature trees surrounding the project site. Additionally, the applicant will plant 236 replacement trees including eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and d. The removal of the trees is necessary to construct required improvements within the public street right-of-way or within a flood control or utility right-of-way. The removal of the subject trees is necessary to construct public improvements; and e. The trees cannot be preserved through pruning and proper maintenance or relocation. A large number of the trees are in poor condition or need to be removed due to conflict with the proposed improvements related to the construction of the proposed 17-lot subdivision; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 3 f. The trees do not constitute a significant natural resource in the city. The trees slated for removal do not constitute a significant natural resource as the trees in the surrounding area are not dependent for their survival or are they significant because of their size, species, location or aesthetic qualities; and g. Removal of the trees is not restricted by a Specific Plan, Community Plan, or condition of approval. The eucalyptus trees along the north and south property line are required to be replaced per the Etiwanda Specific Plan. The landscape plan submitted for the project includes planting replacement eucalyptus windrows along the north and south property lines; and h. Every effort has been made to incorporate the trees into the design of the project and the only appropriate alternative is the removal of the tree. The trees slated for removal are in conflict with the construction of on-site improvements and cannot be incorporated into the project; and i. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the health, safety, or viability of surrounding trees, nor will it negatively impact the aesthetics or general welfare of the surrounding area. The project site is in an area with a large number of mature trees. The impact on the surrounding area will be minimal with the planting of 236 replacement trees. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-34 TRP DRC2020-00140 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 4 C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR EXCEPTION DRC2020-00141, A REQUEST FOR AN INCREASE IN THE MAXIMUM WALL HEIGHT FROM 6 FEET TO 8 FEET ALONG THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT SITE, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PROPOSED 17-LOT SUBDIVISION IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (.1 - 2 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE) OF THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AND THE EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A. Recitals. 1. Manning Homes filed an application for Minor Exception DRC2020-00141 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Exception request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 12th day of May 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to a vacant parcel located east side of East Avenue, west of Golden Lock Place, and south of Banyan Street; and b. The project site is a vacant parcel with an area of approximately 10.4 acres. The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 1,020 feet (east to west) along the north property line, 1,199 feet along the south property line, 255 feet (north to south) along the west property line, and 378 feet along the east property line; and C. The existing land uses on, and General Plan land use and zoning designations for, the project site and the surrounding properties (relative to the above-noted parcels) are as follows: Land Use General Zoning PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 2 Plan Site Vacant Parcel Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* North Single-Family Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot South Single-F mily Residence Very Low Very Low (VL) Residential District* Vacant Lot East Sin le-F mily Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* West Single-Family Residences Very Low Very Low VL Residential District* *Etiwanda Specific Plan &Equestrian Overlay District .1 -2 Dwelling Units per Acre d. The applicant is requesting a Minor Exception to allow the construction of combination walls (garden/screen walls on top of retaining walls)with a height of up to 8 feet along the southern boundary of the project site; and e. Per Table 17.48.050-1 of the Development Code, the maximum wall height of fences and walls along the rear and interior property lines is 6 feet. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed development is in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of the Development Code and the Etiwanda Specific Plan, and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The General Plan designation of the project site is Very Low and the zoning of the property is Very Low(VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The Minor Exception does not affect the General Plan designation, zoning designation, or the residential purpose of the project site; and b. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The Minor Exception for additional wall height will not result in a substantially larger house, an increase in lot coverage, an increase in density, or adjustments to the physical lot area of the subject lots; and C. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. The proposed walls will be located generally where there are grade differences that warrant retaining walls. Generally, the natural terrain of the project site slopes from north to south. Therefore, the usual alternative, an earthen slope, is not practical because of the lack of available space; and d. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The Minor Exception will allow the applicant to construct walls that will provide adequate property screening/security and usable yard area and are similar to other walls that have been constructed for the same purpose because of similar site conditions. The walls will be consistent with the standards and guidelines of the City. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 3 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference, based upon the findings as follows: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by Applied Planning, Inc. and was peer-reviewed by The Altum Group, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential project environmental impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i)that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. C. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission therefore adopts the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission's decision is based is the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 774-4330. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-33 ME DRC2020-00141 — MANNING HOMES May 12, 2021 Page 4 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to- wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: SUBTT20334; DR DRC2020-00139; TRP DRC2020-00140; ME DRC2020-00141 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map; Design Review; Tree Removal Permit; Minor Exception ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The step-through gates at each end of the trail should have a minimum of 36 inches between the wood bollards for easier equestrian access. 2. The proposed equestrian trail cannot be blocked permanently for any purpose. Standard Conditions of Approval 3. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 4. The applicant shall agree to defend at his sole expense any action brought against the City, its agents, officers, or employees, because of the issuance of such approval, or in the alternative, to relinquish such approval. The applicant shall reimburse the City, its agents, officers, or employees, for any Court costs and attorney's fees which the City, its agents, officers, or employees may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action. The City may, at its sole discretion, participate at its own expense in the defense of any such action but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligations under this condition. 5. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 6. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption and Mitigated Negative Declaration fee in the amount of $2,530.25. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing. 7. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 5 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 8. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 9. This tentative tract map or tentative parcel map shall expire, unless extended by the Planning Commission, unless a complete final map is filed with the Engineering Services Department within 3 years from the date of the approval. 10. Access gates to the rear yards shall be constructed from a material more durable than wood gates. Acceptable materials include, but are not limited to, wrought iron and PVC. 11. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. 12. Construct block walls between homes (i.e., along interior side and rear property lines), rather than wood fencing for permanence, durability, and design consistency. 13. All building numbers and individual units shall be identified in a clear and concise manner, including proper illumination and in conformance with Building and Safety Services Department standards, the Municipal Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Department (RCFD) Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 2 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) and Articles of Incorporation of the Homeowners' Association are subject to the approval of the Planning and Engineering Services Department and the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map or prior to the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A recorded copy shall be provided to the City Engineer. The Homeowners' Association shall submit to the Planning Department a list of the name and address of their officers on or before January 1 of each and every year and whenever said information changes. 15. The developer shall submit a construction access plan and schedule for the development of all lots for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department approval; including, but not limited to, public notice requirements, special street posting, phone listing for community concerns, hours of construction activity, dust control measures, and security fencing. 16. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, sign program, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations, and the Etiwanda Specific Plan. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. A uniform hardscape and street furniture design including seating benches, trash receptacles, free-standing potted plants, bike racks, light bollards, etc., shall be utilized and be compatible with the architectural style. Detailed designs shall be submitted for Planning Department review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. On corner side yards, provide minimum 5-foot setback between walls/fences and sidewalk. The 5-foot wall/fence setback and the parkway shall have landscape and irrigation in addition to the required street trees. Detailed landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. The parkway landscaping including trees, shrubs, ground covers and irrigation shall be maintained by the property owner. The developer shall provide each prospective buyer written notice of the parkway maintenance requirement, in a standard format as determined by the Planning Director, prior to accepting a cash deposit on any property. 20. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 21. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step-throughs in accordance with Engineering Services Department Standard Drawing 1006-B and 1007-B. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 3 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 22. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building and Safety Official. 23. Where corner side, interior side or rear yard property lines are adjacent to local equestrian trails, construct minimum 6-foot high decorative masonry walls. Decorative masonry shall mean split-face double sided block, `slump stone' or an alternative material that is acceptable to the Design Review Committee. 24. Prior to any use of the project site or business activity being commenced thereon, all Conditions of Approval shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 25. Six-foot decorative block walls shall be constructed along the project perimeter. If a double wall condition would result, the developer shall make a good faith effort to work with the adjoining property owners to provide a single wall. Developer shall notify, by mail, all contiguous property owners at least 30 days prior to the removal of any existing walls/fences along the project perimeter. 26. Street names shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval in accordance with the adopted Street Naming Policy prior to approval of the final map 27. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. 28. For single-family residential development, all slope planting and irrigation shall be continuously maintained in a healthy and thriving condition by the developer until each individual unit is sold and occupied by the buyer. Prior to releasing occupancy for those units, an inspection shall be conducted by the Planning Department to determine that they are in satisfactory condition. 29. Front yard and corner side yard landscaping and irrigation shall be required per the Development Code and/or This requirement shall be in addition to the required street trees and slope planting. 30. A detailed landscape and irrigation plan, including slope planting and model home landscaping in the case of residential development, shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to the issuance of Building Permits for the development or prior final map approval in the case of a custom lot subdivision. For development occurring in the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, the landscape plans will also be reviewed by Fire Construction Services. 31. Landscaping and irrigation systems required to be installed within the public right-of-way on the perimeter of this project area shall be continuously maintained by the developer. 32. All private slopes of 5 feet or more in vertical height and of 5:1 or greater slope, but less than 2:1 slope, shall be, at minimum, irrigated and landscaped with appropriate ground cover for erosion control. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 4 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 33. All private slopes in excess of 5 feet, but less than 8 feet in vertical height and of 2:1 or greater slope shall be landscaped and irrigated for erosion control and to soften their appearance as follows: one 15-gallon or larger size tree per each 150 sq. ft. of slope area, 1-gallon or larger size shrub per each 100 sq. ft. of slope area, and appropriate ground cover. In addition, slope banks in excess of 8 feet in vertical height and 2:1 or greater slope shall also include one 5-gallon or larger size tree per each 250 sq. ft. of slope area. Trees and shrubs shall be planted in staggered clusters to soften and vary slope plane. Slope planting required by this section shall include a permanent irrigation system to be installed by the developer prior to occupancy. 34. Tree maintenance criteria shall be developed and submitted for Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. These criteria shall encourage the natural growth characteristics of the selected tree species. 35. Trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to and along structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building. 36. All walls shall be provided with decorative treatment. If located in public maintenance areas, the design shall be coordinated with the Engineering Services Department. 37. New windrow planting of Eucalyptus Maculata (Spotted Gum) is required. The size, spacing, staking, and irrigation of these trees shall be in conformance with the City's Development Code Chapter 17.80. 38. All dwellings shall have the front, side and rear elevations upgraded with architectural treatment, detailing and increased delineation of surface treatment subject to Planning Director review and approval prior to issuance of Building Permits. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. (DIF Fees) Development impact fees are due prior to issuance of a building permit or certificate of occupancy per the Engineering Fee schedule, Government Code Section 66000, et seq. and local ordinance. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), the 90-day approval period in which the applicant may protest these fees will begin at the date the fees are invoiced. Protests must be made in writing and be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the close of business on the 90th day of the 90-day approval period. *Note that fees are subject to change annually. 2. Street Lights: The street lights along East Avenue shall be owned and maintained by the City. The street lights along the private street shall be owned and maintained by the private community. Developer shall be responsible to coordinate and pay all costs of street lights and to provide power to City owned street lights. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 5 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Rancho Fiber: - Place 14" conduit structure (Mainline) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) at location in the public right of way or utility easement dedicated specifically to the Rancho Fiber project (on East Ave). This conduit system will be required to follow the joint trench distribution system within the project frontage where the conduit bank can be installed alongside the Telco and CATV conduits at the proper communication depth with 2 pullboxes installed on each end. - Place 1-2" conduit structure (Service) with high-density polyethylene (HDPE) directly from mainline along "A" Street to an 8" round plastic "flower pot" type telecom access box flush mounted to finish grade to serve as a drop access point to the city network directly at each individual residence. This drop conduit shall be dedicated for City fiber drop installation only. An Optical network demarcation enclosure/panel shall be mounted on the side of the home, garage or utility closet for the placement of a Fiber Optic Network Interface Device. Placement of a #6 solid ground wire placed from network demarcation enclosure to power ground or a power outlet is required. If no power ground exists a 5/8" x 8" copper clad ground rod is to be installed for ground wire to be connected. Standard Conditions of Approval 4. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be provided and shall be delineated or noted on the final map. 5. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. 6. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 7. Public storm drain easements shall be graded to convey overflows in the event of a blockage in a sump catch basin on the public street, and provisions made to pass through walls. 8. Trees are prohibited within 5 feet of the outside diameter of any public storm drain pipe measured from the outer edge of a mature tree trunk. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 6 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 10. A non-refundable deposit shall be paid to the City, covering the estimated operating costs for all new streetlights for the first six months of operation, prior to final map approval or prior to Building Permit issuance if no map is involved. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. 12. Construct the following perimeter street improvements including, but not limited to: Street Name Curb & Gutter A.C. Pvmt Side-walk Drive Appr. Street Lights Street Trees Comm Trail Bike Trail Etc. Notes: (a) Pavement reconstruction and overlays will be determined during plan check. 13. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 16.37.010, no person shall make connections from a source of energy, fuel or power to any building or structure which is regulated by technical codes and for which a permit is required unless, in addition to any and all other codes, regulations and ordinances, all improvements required by these conditions of development approval have been completed and accepted by the City Council, except: that in developments containing more than one building, structure or unit, the development may have energy connections made in equal proportion to the percentage of completion of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval, as determined by the City Engineer, provided that reasonable, safe and maintainable access to the property exists. In no case shall more than 95 percent of the buildings, structures or units be connected to energy sources prior to completion and acceptance of all improvements required by these conditions of development approval. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 7 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 14. Improvement Plans and Construction: a. Street improvement plans, including street trees, street lights, and intersection safety lights on future signal poles, and traffic signal plans shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer. Security shall be posted and an agreement executed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney guaranteeing completion of the public and/or private street improvements, prior to final map approval or the issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. b. Prior to any work being performed in public right-of-way, fees shall be paid and a construction permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. c. Pavement striping, marking, and street name signing shall be installed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. d. N/A e. Access ramps for the disabled shall be installed on all corners of intersections per latest ADA standards or as directed by the City Engineer. f. Existing City roads requiring construction shall remain open to traffic at all times with adequate detours during construction. Street or lane closure permits are required. A cash deposit shall be provided to cover the cost of grading and paving, which shall be refunded upon completion of the construction to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. g. Concentrated drainage flows shall not cross sidewalks. Under sidewalk drains shall be installed to City Standards, except for single-family residential lots. h. Street names shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to submittal for first plan check. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 8 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name Botanical Name Common Name Min. Grow Space Spacing Size Qty. Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 16. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 17. Street improvement plans per City Standards for all private streets shall be provided for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to any work being performed on the private streets, fees shall be paid and construction permits shall be obtained from the Engineering Services Department in addition to any other permits required. 18. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 19. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 20. All required public landscaping and irrigation systems shall be continuously maintained by the developer until accepted by the City. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 9 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 21. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. 22. The developer shall be responsible for the relocation of existing utilities as necessary. 23. Provide separate utility services to each parcel including sanitary sewerage system, water, gas, electric power, telephone, and cable TV (all underground) in accordance with the Utility Standards. Easements shall be provided as required. 24. Water and sewer plans shall be designed and constructed to meet the requirements of the Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD), Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, and the Environmental Health Department of the County of San Bernardino. A letter of compliance from the CVWD is required prior to final map approval or issuance of permits, whichever occurs first. Such letter must have been issued by the water district within 90 days prior to final map approval in the case of subdivision or prior to the issuance of permits in the case of all other residential projects. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Gates installed across a residential emergency vehicle access road (fire lane) are required to be in accordance with Standard 5-3. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. Construction materials and methods and automatic fire sprinkler systems are to be in compliance with Chapter 7A of the California Building Code, Section R337 of the California Residential Code, and Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 3. The site/project is located in the designated Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area. Please include this note on the plans. A site-specific or project-specific fire protection plan is required for this project. The fire protection plan is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 49-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 10 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including T-24 Energy Calculations, Structural Calculations, and Soils Report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards. The new structures are required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers. This site is located in the fire area designated VHFHSZ, all structures must be constructed with ignition resistant or noncombustible materials in accordance with the approved Fire protection Plan and/or the most current edition of the California Building Code including all local ordinances and standards. Vegetation / Landscaping must be designed and installed in accordance to the guidelines from the RCFPD for sites located in the VHFHSZ fire area. Grading Section Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, a copy of the Grading Special Conditions of Approval shall be included within the engineered wall plans and calculations. Standard Conditions of Approval 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. A geologic report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer or Engineering Geologist and submitted at the time of application for Grading and Drainage Plan review. 5. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the Engineering Services Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 7. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 8. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 11 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the Engineering Services Department. 12. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 13. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 14. Prior to issuance of a wall permit, on engineered combination garden/retaining walls along the property boundary the structural calculations for the wall shall assume a level toe/heel at the adjacent off-site property (i.e. a manufactured slope is not present). This shall be shown in the typical sections of the grading and drainage plan. 15. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 16. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 12 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the following information in the equestrian trails: — Provide PVC fencing per city standards, provide a 4" thick decomposed granite (DG) surface, provide a drainage V ditch parallel to the trail, provide a bridge over the V ditch where necessary for access to corals, and gates to corrals. The equestrian bridges shall be capable of carrying vehicle loads where necessary. Where the longitudinal slope (s) is S< 5% the cross fall shall be 2%, if S>5% the cross fall may be 4% maximum. Where water bars required, the spacing for the water bars is: 50' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 4% to 6%, 40' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 6.1% to 9%, 30' maximum for longitudinal slopes of 9.1% to 12%, 20' maximum for longitudinal slopes greater than 12%. In the equestrian trails water bars shall also be placed at the top and bottom of the trail where the gradient of the trail changes, i.e. a steep downhill slope which will cause additional erosion to the trail. 18. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 19. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 20. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 21. Prior to the issuance of a Grading Permit the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Agreement of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Services Department and recorded with the County Recorder's Office. 22. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 23. The applicant shall provide a copy of a completed EPA Form 7520-16 (Inventory of Injection Wells) for each underground infiltration device, with the Facility ID Number assigned, to the Engineering Services Department Official prior to issuance of the Grading Permit and/or approval of the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. A copy of EPA Form 7520-16 shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set, and a copy of said form shall be included in the project-specific Water Quality Management Plan. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 13 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 24. The land owner shall provide an inspection report by a qualified person/company on a biennial basis for the Class V Injection Wells/underground infiltration chambers to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis all best management practices (BMP"s) as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the land owner. 25. The applicant shall prepare or amend existing CC&R's as needed to clarify how maintenance responsibilities will be shared between the newly created parcels and the remaining existing parcels of Tract No. 20334 prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading and drainage plan and the CC&Rs shall address shared access to private street, private storm drains, storm water treatment devices, surface drainage and maintenance of common areas, including landscaping within public rights-of-way and Best Management Practices identified in the WQMP. 26. The HOA shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The HOA shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. All costs associated with the underground infiltration chamber are the responsibility of the HOA. 27. The HOA shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. 28. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the Engineering Director, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit or Engineering Services Department issued right of way permit, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or designee, a final project specific water quality management plan for review and approval, and shall have said document recorded with the San Bernardino County Recorder's Office. 30. Prior to the start of landscaping operations, the landscape architect and the landscape contractor shall provide a sample of the weed fabric barrier to the Project Planner, City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department. The weed barrier shall be permeable. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 14 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 31. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 32. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 33. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 34. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the Building Official, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. 35. The subgrade for the permeable paver storm water treatment devices shall have a level subgrade. Prior to issuance of the grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) the engineer of record shall provide a pad elevation for the permeable paver subgrade on the grading plan and shall provide a detail on the WQMP site and drainage plan showing the permeable paver subgrade as level. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 15 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 36. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. The final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall specifically address items (a,b,e,h,and i) above. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 16 of 17 Project#: SUBTT20334 Project Name: EDR - East Ave. 17 Location: 6179 EAST AVE - 022519117-0000 Project Type: Tentative Tract Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 37. RESIDENTIAL MANDATORY MEASURES — CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE — Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall comply with Section 4.106.3 (Grading and Paving) of the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code: Construction plans shall indicate how the site grading or drainage system will manage all surface water flows to keep water from entering building. Examples of methods to manage surface water include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Swales. 2. Water collection and disposal systems. 3. French drains. 4. Water retention gardens. 5. Other water measures which keep surface water away from buildings and aid in groundwater recharge. Exception: Additions and alterations not altering the drainage path. www.CityofRC.us Printed:3/31/2021 Page 17 of 17 or01CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS - A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020- 00138; and DRC2020-00087. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 subject to the conditions of approval included as an attachment to this report. Alternatively, if the Commission determines that findings for approval cannot be made, the Commission may direct staff to return with Resolutions denying the entitlements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission denied a portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which requested off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has subsequently withdrawn their related request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00489. Based on comments at the February 24, 2021 public hearing, staff is now returning to the Commission as a General Business item to consider the remaining entitlements which the Commission did not take action on at the February 24 public hearing, specifically the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and the balance of the Conditional Use Permit relative to the operation of the service station and convenience store, which not excludes off-sale beer and wine sales. BACKGROUND: For a full history of the subject development application, reference the staff report and related attachments from the February 24, 2021 public hearing which have been included with this staff report as Exhibit 2. In addition to the portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which the Commission ultimately denied, Commissioners raised a number of questions relative to the balance of the development application at the February 24, 2021 public hearing. Specifically, the Planning Commission expressed the following concerns and questions: 1. Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see the proposed use expand fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents; 2. Signage and Exterior Illumination: commissioners expressed concern that exterior illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the street; 3. Equity: several commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the Southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a convenience store and restaurant would be a benefit to the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood. 4. Concentration of Service Stations: commissioners also noted a perceived concern related to the number of service stations located within close proximity to the proposed project. After deliberating on this item, and ultimately denying the CUP request for off-sale alcohol sales, the commission continued the hearing and directed staff and the applicant to go back and consider changes to the project that might address these concerns. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Following the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the applicant revised the project in an effort to address the commission's stated concerns and questions and has amended the project to now include the following: 1. In order to improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced with fresh food areas; 2. To address concerns from the commission regarding exterior lighting and signage, lighting and signage shall be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald frontage shall be either externally illuminated or"halo" lit, so as to minimize any impacts and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be illuminated; 3. Beyond the abovementioned revisions to the project, and in response to the commission's concerns regarding this project being a high-quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant has also revised the project to include: • Electric Vehicle charging stations—the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each. The site plan has been revised to reflect the location of these chargers; • In the event that the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline; • The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and install appropriate drought tolerant landscaping. 4. Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the sale of tobacco, the applicant has agreed to not advertise any tobacco or tobacco related products along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco related products will be located behind the cashier's counter within the store, so as not to be easily accessible by minors. Regarding the perceived concentration of service stations, staff acknowledges that there are multiple service stations within close proximity to the subject location, however there is currently no "concentration ordinance" relative to the location of service stations. So, despite other service stations existing in the area, there is currently no prohibition on a service station locating at the subject site. 2 Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations which can include convenience stores. Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings for the service station and convenience store, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, staff now feels that the project meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high -quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact: At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public 3 health, safety, and welfare Moratorium on Service Stations: Staff notes that on April 21, 2021, the City Council approved an Urgency Ordinance enacting a 45-day moratorium on service stations throughout the City. The City Council will consider whether to extend this moratorium on June 2, 2021. This moratorium was enacted, in part, to allow staff and the City Council to study and analyze potential impacts relative to service stations, including the number and location of service stations within the City, their fiscal performance and whether or not additional regulations are necessary to ensure their compatibility with the City's goals and objectives. The subject development application was exempted from the moratorium provided that the developer obtains building permits within 6 months of the effective date of the moratorium, or by October 21, 2021. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: As now proposed, the project meets the Council's core value of "Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future," as well as "continuous improvement." Following the direction from the Commission at their February 24, 2021 meeting, the applicant has now revised the project to include a number of sustainable measures, including but not limited to the inclusion of electric vehicle chargers and ensuring that the building design will meet a minimum of LEED Silver standards. These sustainability measures intentionally embrace and anticipate the future as the City continues to seek more sustainable development. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Revised Project Description Exhibit B - Revised Site Plan and Floor Plan Exhibit C - February 24, 2021 Staff Report and Attachments Draft Resolution 21-29 Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Draft Resolution 21-30 Approving Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 Draft Resolution 21-31 Approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 4 Revised Project Description Addressing Issues Raised by Planning Commission TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS Orbis Real Estate Partners proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant(Laredo Taco Company) A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. Orbis is eliminating its request to provide off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20—Off-Sale Beer and Wine License). All tobacco products will be located behind the cashier and only accessible by the cashier unless requested by a customer. The area previously reserved for alcohol sales floor area will be dedicated to general grocery items. The offerings of fresh food have been explained as follows: Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical roller-grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten-free chili. Across the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you"refrigerator case, filled with grab- and-go lunch items: sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a"seasonal blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion-controlled packets of cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7-Eleven is stocked with enough gluten- free,paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness-obsessed snackers, with Exhibit A just enough"normal" food to resemble a small grocery store.I Fresh food offering will be located throughout the store concentrated near the main entrance. The project proposes to design to LEED Silver certification, and if the City provides additional time for the project to pull a building permit (5 months or more in addition to the existing 6 month deadline),project will design and certify to LEED Silver standards. The proposed landscape plan already exceeds water conservation standards. At a minimum, the project will incorporate at least 2 electrical vehicle charging stations to supply, at a minimum, charging for a single vehicle at Level 2 standard and another single vehicle at"fast-charging" standards. The sale of diesel fuel, if any, will not accommodate heavy duty trucks and will not include high- flow diesel dispensers. Although the project originally was anticipated to balance without the need of soil import, additional soil import will be required to satisfy flood protection standards. A conservative amount of 5,000 cubic yards has been estimated. The Air Quality Evaluation for the project is being updated but the Applicant's air quality consultant has already determined such amount would result in a less than significant impact. Under any scenario, the project will not require more than 5,000 cubic yards. 'https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store ° VICINITY MAP z z oW ONZVQW ? • / _/I rf//I �=K;�....w(:.a,.t'•.-�1'�-.- yyyyyiy°yiyyti`iyy i°y y y yWyiyy Wy yyy y iyy y WyWWi i yyy y W�y yy y W WW y y i•+ W♦y•Wy'y yy'y`i yy`y Yy W°y'y'W y W�1•�i•i i`t'\,'�•yW'�yy••y W�y W y••�'y�'y y yy y�y W y yyI •y yy yy yyy\y\/i\fyr�/®y'y_`i11 1I1 1I I III II J1 III II I1 IyI II III I 1_;DP 0:BO'-i�a`Vp,_A'y y rO0/0QO Q_a/v—W/j\<;�y o°°�„°��°O iS�`I;`'''.y`W.^If`III I I II1 y 1 III1 11 I1_I..11 I I1I 1.y..W.WW ,■qyW/WWiyq'<�yW`W ■\yWyWJWi yWW\)<yiW\,WW_yrr��i L`�yW W'V�VI yWW WWy1 y�iW°'W°®y♦WWi♦•y"°yyW i-Wd y y•®WWW♦a zyy,yW iWW°yy'W yWi$�•,,'dy�°y iy W WWy•+Oy yQi yyWyi..i4y��iy-'y�i!W•�ieOjW`0;_O�1�,_O-0�_yi WyOa•yOiW■iy■y y t:;;■y:■■■yA y:■;�■■■■■<y:■■ ■t'■yyy/y/y W yW/W W y/�i/W�yi �i♦iy 1�W`■T y�yy Wy,',•�A1ayWWyW'®♦•♦4,yqy i y♦�♦.,yaaW.yW♦y WW.Wd..,.��•I.J`d•y.i°WyW♦�1 Wy•yWi:i•'.;d°Pw y W iyyy 1 yi a N yy rW�""W iW'.�J°y G y iWyyWy i'`7�WWWIy W]'W V♦.-y i+WyWyW 1'/♦•_wyiy y.i:1♦i i y.y y•Wyi`W:"yI�,/"'W y�'Wy•y°°y yyy•yiWW yaJ•yy♦i'iW yW y y`'•W®�y iWiW.y y yyAi°y^`•a♦W''�iy'.viqy W yqW.1_y Y 4 y®iyWWy•y+iq'•i.y•O.' i®Wi'yW W'•°�dy y oyWyyy WW°ytiy'°rWi y'//•-/yy`+i�iWW°W•y/WiyW W\W Wyi+°WWW y••y'i1iiW'yyW y Wy•'yYi i�..y ..W�pii�Wi iii-W i W i i yyW W�y W W W y iWW-NW Wi iyW`•y iyi yWyyi Wi W y y+i WW WWWy'Wy yWW i-i y yW y y W WyW WVWy i WWW i•y y W�ii ii'y�y yW yW+y iW iiWW W•Wyy+-Wi y W y i'W W W yi�Vli W1WWy yy y••W�yiW.y W y,i y y py+y iyWW W W•'y W iW yW WW Y yy i r WWiWW i'W+W iy�W°iy'yW'y W iWy i„yy'W�W y+i W'iW W i i iW+Wi i W`WW•_iy W WyyW WW yW y WWW•y WW"y W WW W y•W yY iW`Wi W y W,W y yiyi Wi i y W i iWW yy y yWi iyW i iWyW W y,Wi y W W W W y W iWWi W iy�WWyW'y W WWW• WW y iyW W WWyi yW Wi Wi W W Wy WWW i y yWyyWW yW W W�yW iWWW•W Wy WWW iWW'W yWO Wy`y Wy W yW iyi yW yy WyWy�iyW yWW J W Y W WWW Wy yW ' WWiW W,i W iW W y yW W yWWW`W Wy yyWy W ` t II �I I I Is I I EOH I II EOH oO o — 6 6 ® ✓'a�^Y °Jw0NQ���o � o JEOH EOH EOI"1 - - — FGI EOH EQ . FOOTHILL BLVD. 258.8 m w O > ¢ QaaPROPOSED 9TH STREET w WW� MavQU"�_a�_Na � Nao�zwa— ~�p�Cc �] N. oNCmcO OcW>LuWNaofNca��Sn� oRIGHT 0 Q z OAr�Ro ROUTE >40 MPH O 0N � N � wNwIN/OUT www w L D IV EWAY W 0 E TH ST. n n En cn _ Of � OfPROPOSED LOT PROPOSED ALIZE W E 8 H ST.I 25' BUILDING E) SIGI� 0 0 0 0 0 0 �zw0LINE BIKE RACK SETBACK FEMA FLOODINTERSECTIO 1- N I� 0 W 1/l LIMIT LINE o ITE ml �?O 6T ST. m E PROPOSED n � Lo 0 r, co 0 WW y W y y Wy W i W W W W V W i i W W W ■ W Y MONUMENT SIGNFIRE 00iWW � FOU TH ST. HYDRANT �^N W . W on WWiiy W 10y W W i W W W W i W W W 57.2 O o22 T coI� o ZPAT 10 PROJECT DATA co60x60 � 7COMMERCIAL PROJECT INFORMATION: Z _ _ _ _ PROPOSEDl. 45 BUILDING o') wSTORAGE y GREASE l _APPLICANT: AT ASSOCIATES, INC.SETBACK I INTERCEPTOR ATTN: MIKE HERMAN I w zn O O 701 N. PARKCENTER DR. W Z > 0 SANTA ANA, CA 92705op O w oTEL: (714) 560-8615 CEL: (714) 393-1103 W w001 MHERMAN@TAIT.COM Wm DESIGNATED 0 iWWyW W wARCHITECT: TAIT & ASSOCIATES, INC. OI RESTAURANT 'O Jm1U Z ATTN: TIM VIRUS = OPARKING 701 N. PARKCENTER DR. ZW SANTA ANA, CA 92705 =STALL) ♦ m W WW W a a - ■j FEMA FLOOD TEL: (714) 560-8624 09(13) . A WWyWWWWiyWyWiiWyW W CEL: (714) 529-7992 CD INE TVIRUSQTAIT.COM I • A' ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER(S : 0209-032-35-0000 ® ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE Dp � OR SWC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST. ° : � e WWWiWWW W RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 917300 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STATION- CONVENIENCE STORE 5.3' 28.5' 1 20' I 30' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: I i ' . 56.2 ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (G-I)0EXISTING SOUTH: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (G- )in S�/ =ELEVE 4 - A �STORAGE m EAST: MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (M)� O $TORE WEST: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (G-1) EXISTING ZONING: G-1 - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL BUILDING OX66 Lo D EXISTING LAND USE: VACANTQ6,600 SF PROPOSED ZONING: G-1 - GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 4 <■ PROPOSED LAND USE: GROUND-UP GAS STATION- CONVENIENCE STORE/ ■ co YO ,Dp M 09 BUILDING INFORMATION: Ic- t D w � NET ACREAGE: ±73,314 SF (1.68 ACRES)RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 6,600 SF (+ 3,600 SF PATIO AREA) 1 Lo N D RESTAURANT AREA: ±2,005 S PROPOSED IF W W y W y y W W ELECTRICAL W y y W W PROPOSED CONVENIENCE AREA: ±4,595 SF a METER PROPOSED CANOPY AREA: Q 8 E< oCABINET dpm filI BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: 75 FT 10 ma •'LOTCOVERAGE: 13.3% (9,780 SF) °� o oLANDSCAPING LOT COVERAGE: 31.8% (23,306 SF) E;�DESIGNATED � 00 PROPOSED o FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED: YESRESTAURANT TRAN;�FORMER REQUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS o PARKING FROM ARCHIBALD AVE 45 FT STALLS O� FROM 9TH STREET 25 FT Bdp0o 1 (7) 08 y y�� 1 •5 13 8' SIDE 5 FT REAR 0 FT :J REQUIRED CANOPY SETBACKS FROM ARCHIBALD AVE 45 FT PROPOSEDTHREE FROM 9TH STREET 25 FT PROPOSED EVCS REQUIRED LANDSCAPING SETBACKS PHASE 480 SERVICE 45 BUILDING OmmmomEwr SWITCH GEAR TRANSFORMER FRONT 45 FT I SETBACK SIDE (INTERIOR) 25 FT SIDE (STREET) 5 FT N KJ REAR OFT NTA' E 00i j iS' / WQ EXISTV� I ING FIRE PARKING REQUIREMENTS: w CENAW yy pW HYDRANT vH YM POJV CONVENIENCE PARKING REQUIRED: 14 (3 STALLS PER 1000 SF) NyX 9 CONVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED: 14 STALLS (PLUS ADDITIONAL 14 STALLS AT FUEL) 51 9' RESTAURANT PARKING REQUIRED: 20 (RESTAURANT USE: 10 PER 1000 SF) m 'a PROPOSED RESTAURANT PARKING PROVIDED: 22 STALLS _0 AIR & WATER �O TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 34 STALLS (INCL. 2 ACCESSIBLE & BIKE RACKS) N TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 36 STALLS (INCL. 2 ACCESSIBLE, 2 EV BIKE RACKS) 0 PROPOSED TRASH EV CHARGING VDESIGNATED UTILITY INFORMATION: DESIGNATED ENCLOSURE PARKING PROPOSED oPROPOSED 9 ELECTRICAL: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON STALLS (4) SHARED CONVENIENCEHEALY TANK GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY m o P- �STORE WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Ei �FULL _STORM DRAIN: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA—i eI p ARKI G In I MOVEMEI4T SANITARY SEWER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICTSTALLS O . REFUSE COLLECTION: BURRTEC DISPOSAL WR VEWAY N SITE LEGEND o o ° 0 �PROPERTY LINE ACCESSIBLE PARKINGFE Ln 0 0 PATH OFTRAVEL SPACE ° ° ° ° -0- (E) UTILITY POLEBUILDING SETBACK EXISTING LANDSCAPE SETBACK (E) FIRE HYDRANTDRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVED (E) STREET LIGHT 15' W DRAINAGE & DEMO BUILDING Lljro U 25 W DRAINAGE &TY EASEMENT UTILITY EASEMENT CONCRETE PAVING/SIDEWALK 0 10' 20' 40' STANDARD A.C. PAVING SHEET:N SCALE: 1 =20 t , ✓ P ` \ TGA TEGATE n W I II y y LANDSCAPE AREA z csp- 11 gCD CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ocA,o ® DECORATIVE PAVING � o KEYNOTES Ld ww ❑[ ] ❑R❑EII❑❑R®❑T❑❑ ❑000❑R El ❑❑❑❑DE]❑❑ I❑❑❑❑OOR❑❑OOR❑ z J ❑N❑ R❑❑❑❑dVl❑[OJT❑IN E!' ❑[fit ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑T❑ [ ❑N ❑00❑❑R W W W -:3 I I ❑N❑ ❑❑❑❑❑NT ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑R M❑N❑❑❑❑T❑Rill] ❑❑❑❑Ell]®❑TCON❑❑ I I I ❑ z z z z J J J J cn cn o Di MO❑ ❑[Nii w w w w cn0 Ln > (/) > ❑07 ❑RO❑®❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑OR R❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ DOE] N ❑ ❑❑❑ ❑OR ❑0❑ o 0 0 0 0 wOf of ❑[�JJ❑❑ ❑N❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ON❑❑d ❑OR ❑O❑T M❑ ❑N❑ ❑❑❑R❑❑❑ cn bi cn cn cn zz M❑❑H[N❑❑❑ > > > > W W W W W W J J of 0' of of U 0 ❑ ❑ r7 r- N I,- O co I- ❑ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O O CD CD CD CD CD e❑ n � Ln co r- 00 rn COOLER FIRE VAULT FREEZER RISER ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ Ll F— 7' a oEl ❑ COOLER VAULT —❑❑ El ❑ B GENERAL NOTES El El F;.' ",F n ❑ � o a q H El 9 ❑�, ❑®❑�' z ❑ ❑ ❑ o z ❑ � o ® FRESH FOOD ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ g o 0— �IA11111111 ® BACKROOM ❑�� o COOLER ❑❑ Of ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑ P1 ❑ r7. _ COD QDMD❑ EEll Emcl 1� xD LIE4 o ❑❑❑ WOMENS MENS °�°�� NODDCrO ❑❑ ❑ O= wolaoo®air ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑El El Ej � � —RESTROOM RESTROOM— L °❑ � °❑ � ❑❑ � o_ COOLER ❑ ❑ � Z ❑❑❑ ❑ ❑ „� �° 0° \ VAULT = 2 10 ' ❑� ❑❑ ❑� ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ �- �- ❑®❑❑Q�' o // ®❑ ®� ti - - ( Oo m ti oA oLH m ❑° FOOD ° ❑ ° D 3 _ FRESH PRODUCE W � o 00 O ❑ 0 ® o = ❑R=H o DR o y ❑LL ILJ' O ❑ o OO O� --- ---- — O — — - — DD111 oETODDR �°� DO DO 3 ❑ oDo ❑ m ❑ O� ® ❑ ❑�' DDf07 �00� ❑� ❑❑' ❑ ❑❑ ° � 0 � a W ®O O c o >ElD 50 ( W0v DRDCr c` on0 QO WO U u ❑❑ Elo oa MERCHANDISE ®❑ Q � o £ _ O c ®® 3 ° m oa o� o 7 aD0 DO 0 0 o QOc c a J Eip m nh O N Q O DINING °° m ❑ 0 OFFICE DDcn D TOO OR $ ❑❑❑ W OO �❑� DDfRDOH DDODD�� ❑ Q M❑RO MOT®TOO ^^ a O U pp Q R RD RD RI a �❑ h od �O Oa o 0 0 o � °❑ SALES - F— STORAGE � o ti o � ❑❑❑ El 7� E] E] Ej CCC � ❑ ❑ Lj El L-1 El El a ' O ❑❑ 0° ° ❑ T❑ o o ❑ tiEl8 ❑ B El ❑ ❑ o El B o 0 Ln ® ❑ H ❑ ❑ � o cD N N ❑❑M' ❑❑❑ ❑❑®❑❑V ❑®❑V ❑❑®❑V ❑❑�❑V Q o 0 0 ❑I�LI�T�y' Q ❑❑❑�❑ o . Of G C W S 0- HD U ¢ d O d Q W O d Z O d M O Uj LJi Uj Z O cn Z W C) O N Q I O O N N ❑H❑❑T❑ wW ON cl- N Lu ❑ EIFM rz m o CDSCALE: Z � ❑❑OOR ❑ ❑❑N 1 o CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 24, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020-00459 (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS — A new commercial building with a service station and convenience store proposing off-site alcohol sales (Type 20) located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209- 032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommend that the City Council deny the request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459, and direct staff to return to the Planning Commission with Resolutions as appropriate. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. While the project meets all relevant development standards for site design and architecture, the convenience store proposes off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20)across the street from an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and within a census tract (Census Tract 21.05)which has been found to be among the most overconcentrated census tracts for off-sale alcohol licenses within the City. Over the course of two neighborhood meetings, neighbors have expressed concerns which are substantiated by facts related to the proximity of the project to the school and overconcentration within the census tract. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of the project. BACKGROUND: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial (GI). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping). This existing building is proposed to remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. Exhibit C PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 2 The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District PROJECT ANALYSIS: A. Protect Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) with off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20 — Off-Sale Beer and Wine License) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco Company)which proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41 — On-sale Beer and Wine—Eating Places License). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The driveway entrance and parking lot of the existing multi-tenant commercial building at the southern portion of the property is proposed to be reconfigured because of this project. The applicant has provided a Project Description (Exhibit C) describing the proposed 7-Eleven convenience store portion of the project as a "new lab store concept." According to the applicant, this concept differs from a conventional convenience store by providing the following amenities: made-to-order specialty drinks, self-serve specialty coffee, cold treats bar (yogurt, ice cream, etc.), and a "Cellar," which houses a variety of beers and wines for sale. In addition,the applicant describes the Laredo Taco Company restaurant as serving fresh Mexican food made-to-order. The 7-Eleven and service station component of the project proposes to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, whereas Laredo Taco Company proposes to operate 5:00 AM to 10:OOPM every day. The proposed project is consistent with all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard approx. Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet (1-foot increment from the feet (fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling cano Page 2 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 3 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback (9th Min. 25 feet feet (proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet (fueling cano Street Side Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (9th Average Depth of 25 feet (9th Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet (9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet cano 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landscaping: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls. This results in an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Convenience 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 Store at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9th Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Page 3 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 4 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164: The project includes a proposal to subdivide the existing subject parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9t" Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Upon reviewing the application, staff identified certain concerns with the proposed development, particularly related to the request for the PCN and the related CUP. Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459: The project requires a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) pursuant to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulations and state law to allow an off-sale alcohol license (Type 20) related to the proposed convenience store within a census tract where alcohol licenses exceed concentration limits established by state law. The applicant has provided a Letter of Justification supporting their request for a PCN, which is included with this report as Exhibit D. Regarding the request for PCN, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, is overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses. ABC permits 3 off-sale alcohol licenses within Census Tract 21.05; the proposed convenience store would constitute the ninth off-sale alcohol license within the census tract. Staff notes that according to a conversation with ABC staff, there are currently 7 active licenses and 1 pending license, in addition to 7-Eleven's request. Pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4, an "undue concentration" of off-sale retail license applications exists under either of the following two scenarios: (1) "The applicant premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes . . . than the average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency;" or (2) "the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located." According to ABC personnel, Census Tract 21.05 is already significantly overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses under the second standard. This means an undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within the census tract. According to ABC's online database, there are 23 census tracts within Rancho Cucamonga where at least one off-sale alcohol license has been issued, and only one other census tract has 9 off-sale alcohol licenses (Census Tract 20.36 — Terra Vista). Therefore, if approved, the requested PCN would make the subject Census Tract 21.05 equal to the most overconcentrated census tract in the City. Exhibit E included with this staff report graphically illustrates the boundary of Census Tract 21.05, highlighting the location of these uses. An undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within this census tract by three times the state's standard, and staff acknowledges that these facts correspond to the concerns raised by neighbors over the course of two neighborhood meetings held for the project. Another concern relative to off-sale alcohol sales is the project's proximity to an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and potential for this to result in an increase in alcohol and tobacco sales to minors. While Cucamonga Elementary School is located immediately to the northeast of the project site across the Archibald Avenue and 9t" Street intersection, staff also notes that the project site is within close proximity to Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, approximately 1,800 feet to the east. Staff notes that the Sherriff's Department recently conducted an operation at 22 off-sale establishments Citywide in which 4 locations, all within close proximity to schools (2 elementary, 1 private, and 1 high school), were caught selling alcohol and tobacco to underage minors. While these incidences were not directly related to the proposed 7-Eleven, this information supports concerns raised by neighbors during two neighborhood Page 4 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 5 meetings held for the project and illustrates a sensitivity to locating such uses near schools Finding: The Development Code provides no findings for PCNs. Rather, ABC regulates the distribution of alcohol licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract pursuant to Sections 23958 and 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code. As described above, the limits are calculated based on the ratio of alcohol licenses to the population within a specific census tract. In cases where a census tract exceeds the allowable limit of certain alcohol licenses (i.e., creates an "undue concentration"), findings in support of a PCN are required to be made by the local governing body. For Rancho Cucamonga, the local governing body is the City Council. The Business and Professions Code does not define the phrase "public convenience or necessity." According to the courts, this means that "the discretion to make that decision includes the discretion to determine the relevant factors on a case-by-case basis." (Nick v. City of Lake Forest, 232 Cal.AppAth 871 (2014)). Decision makers are afforded considerable discretion in making this determination. Fact: Issuing the ABC license to the applicant does not serve the public convenience or necessity because: 1)there is already a significant undue concentration of off-sale alcohol licenses in the subject census tract; 2), the license site is near a school, which data provided by the Sherriff's Department suggests could result in an increase in the number of minors obtaining alcohol; and 3) both of these reasons were expressed by multiple neighbors as part of two public neighborhood meetings. Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00787: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine sales. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations, convenience stores, and alcoholic beverage sales. Further, Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code defines that convenience stores "may be part of a service station or an independent facility." The code also describes alcoholic beverage sales as "the retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by...ABC...as an off-sale establishment." Therefore, one CUP is required to allow the convenience store with service station that functions as an "off-sale establishment."As such, by permitting the requested off-sale alcohol sales, approval of the CUP would exacerbate the overconcentration within the census tract as it is related to the request for a PCN. The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below, specifically Findings #1 and #3, do not support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: General Plan Goal LU-1, requires that the City "Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community-serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents." Policy LU-1.1 further requires that the City "Protect neighborhoods from the Page 5 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 6 encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment."Similarly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." The project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol within an overconcentrated census tract. If permitted,the census tract would contain three times the number of off-sale alcohol licenses that constitute undue concentration under state law. This would be the highest number of licenses within a census tract within the City. This concern of overconcentration has been clearly expressed by neighborhood residents over the course of two neighborhood meetings. Further, while the proposed restaurant component increases the availability of food establishments, the immediate vicinity is already well served, or planned to be well served by service stations and convenience stores, in addition to the noted overconcentration of alcohol off-sales. Therefore, approving such a use is not consistent with the stated goals and policies of General Plan Land Use Goals LU-1 and LU-6. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact:As noted above, the project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol sales within an overconcentrated census tract. The project site is also located across the street from an elementary school. Data from the Sherriff's Department suggests that there is a correlation between the proximity of convenience stores and schools which may increase the potential for alcohol and tobacco sales to minors, as evidenced at other locations throughout the City of similar uses within close proximity to schools. Therefore, the proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. B. Neighborhood Meetings and Neighborhood Concerns: As part of the development review process, the applicant and developer held a Neighborhood Meeting on November 10, 2020, to solicit comments from the surrounding property owners. About 6-7 participants attended virtually. All participants at this meeting expressed opposition to the project, and generally raised the following concerns: perception of high number of service stations and liquor/convenience stores within the area; proximity of the project to Cucamonga Elementary School; concern over hours of operation; and concerns regarding traffic, noise and glare. As a result of the type of concerns raised by residents at this meeting, staff initiated a second Neighborhood Meeting which was held on January 11, 2021. To ensure maximum neighborhood participation for this second meeting, City staff expanded the radius for mailed notices to include over 300 mailers printed in both English and Spanish. A Spanish interpreter was also present at the second meeting. Approximately 12 residents attended this second Neighborhood Meeting and many of the same concerns were raised, with one resident expressing support for the project. As this report has already covered concerns related to the overconcentration of off-sale alcohol, which was a prominent concern raised by the neighbors, staff responds to the remaining neighbor concerns as follows: Page 6 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 7 1. Perceived Concentration of Service Stations: Regarding service stations, there is no "concentration ordinance" in the Development Code which regulates the number of service stations within the City. However, staff acknowledges the neighbor's comments that there are multiple service stations within the vicinity of the subject project. While there is only one service station currently within Census Tract 21.05 (Valero Station, 8514 Vineyard) slightly over a mile from the proposed project, 3 other service stations exist within 1 mile of the project site (76 Station at 10075 Arrow Route, Kwik Sery at 9524 Foothill Boulevard, and Shell Gas at 7996 Archibald Avenue). Staff notes that another service station about '/4 of a mile to the north of the project site was approved as part of DRC2015-00682 in July 2018 to rehabilitate an existing abandoned service station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. It is not known at this time when that service station rehabilitation project may begin construction. Exhibit E also provides the location of service stations within the project vicinity. Staff notes for the Commission's information that Each of these service stations include off-sale alcohol. 2. Hours of Operation: multiple residents raised concerns regarding potential impacts associated with the proposed hours of operation, including an increase in crime and noise. Staff notes that the proposed convenience store and service station will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the Laredo Taco Company proposing hours of 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM, 7 days a week. 3. Traffic, Noise and Glare: Residents expressed concern over potential for increased traffic related to the service station. Staff notes that the project applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis(Urban Crossroads, February 2021), which demonstrates that no significant traffic impacts will occur as a result of this project. To off-set any potential traffic deficiencies, certain traffic improvements to the Archibald and 9th Street, intersection will be required. These improvements generally include modifying existing lanes to accommodate a shared left-through lane and dedicated right turn lane in conjunction with a modification to the traffic signal to accommodate right-turn overlap phasing. Similar improvements at the City's request, and at the applicant's cost, have been identified for the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection, as well. Regarding Noise, the applicant also provided an Acoustical Study (Urban Crossroads, September 2020) which demonstrates that the project will not result in any significant increase in either construction or operational noise. Lastly, the applicant has provided staff with a preliminary Lighting Plan which demonstrates that the project will meet all required lighting standards, thus limiting the potential for adverse impacts on adjacent properties. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on January 19, 2021. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised one design issues related to whether or not two tri-colored metal band features proposed to wrap around the building and fueling canopy should be illuminated. The committee recommended that that tri-colored band should be illuminated, provided that this element comply with all relevant lighting and glare standards. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. For reference on the full discussion related to design and architecture, Exhibits F and G included with this report provide the DRC Comments and Minutes, as well as 3D renderings of the project. F. Fiscal impact Analysis: The Fiscal Impact Analysis(The Natelson Dale Group, Inc.) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide an annual net fiscal benefit of approximately $114,000 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. Generally, new recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also Page 7 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 8 be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. G. Options for the Planning Commission to Consider: While the Planning Commission considers staff's recommendation to deny the application, the Commission may consider the following options: 1. Uphold staff's recommendation to deny application and recommend denial of the PCN to City Council; 2. Reject staff's recommendation and approve the application, and recommend that the City Council approve the PCN; 3. Consider approving (or in the case of the PCN, recommending approval of,) certain entitlements relative to the project application while denying other entitlements. For example, approving the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and CUP, but recommending denial of the PCN, so that the project may be constructed without authorization of off-site sales; 4. Explain to the applicant which aspects of the project the commission finds favorable, direct the applicant to revise the project, and set a continued hearing to a future date. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). Staff notes that, if the project is denied, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. Any correspondence received prior to the public hearing will be provided to the Commission under separate cover. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: For reasons discussed in this report, particularly as it relates to the project's potential to exacerbate an existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses, staff notes that the project will not achieve the City Council's Core Value to "promote and enhance a safe and healthy community." EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Page 8 of 9 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit B: Project Plans Exhibit C: Applicant's Project Description Exhibit D: Applicant's Letter of Justification for PCN Exhibit E: Census Tract 21.05 Vicinity Map Exhibit F: January 19 DRC Comment Letter and Action Minutes Exhibit G: 3D Renderings Page 9 of 9 �k•: I t f Map/AerialPhotograph - - _ S R Subject site: a r . , .. •. • t r' % "'.44 T �� 1 t'c Oin 010 l Exhlibit A — � M --o IA �020 Gnog!e ogle �f VICINITY MAP —EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH c EOH—ES)—EOH—EOH—EOH E H CEO EOH—EOH—SUN =§ Y 8 8 FOOTHILL BLVD 25 . - 66 PROPOSED 9TH STREET - ---— ——— RIGHT 40MPH ——— b --- - _ �dQ{,���{gy� ARRO RBUTE m N —_—_ — E4VAY —`— --------�/ _ T>y o E TH Sr °o _ PROPOSED LOT PROPOSED Sl e e sT. - LINE BIKE RACK SETBACK LNG ♦ FEMA FLOOD(N)TERS CT MIT LINE ITE " E PROPOSED FIRE • ' MONUMENT SIGN rc ro.'.'.'." . . HYDRANT '.rn.'.'.'.' i '.'�.•,.... . . W .-r 22 57 2 ° 1 n/ L PATIO f PROJECT DATA oN� a COMMERCIAL ♦ s6Xs0 U� Mxa a r PROPOSED 45'B ILDING PROJECT INFORMATION: Z C7 �o w STORAGE . ____, GREASE ' ..q E6 SETBACK APPDCANi: TAT§ASSOCIATES,INC. �� INTERCEPTOR °o.p 701 N.PAR CENTER DR. WIg Z>O • ATTN:MIKE HERMAN W N pEdll <.e�". ° SANTA ANA,CA 92705 O a2 a 0 TEL:(714)560-8615DEL p W a 7 p MHERMA1NWAIT.COM3 J it W m7 W DESIGNATED f • jy w J=0 t1 RESTAURANT ARCHITECT. TNT§ASSOCIATED INC. m ATTN ON VIRUS p,(UO Z p O,IN PARKING ^I' 701 N.PARKCENTER DR. U RD ®E I STALLS I w SANTA NA,CA 92705 O FEMA FLOOD ° TEL 71e sm-E624 x a 3 I' OD Of < I I LIMIT ENE � cee p1a)529 799z I TAmisoraTWM it It + L I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (G ) 0209-032-35-000O I p 1 l I N3 I uJ AD— ME ARCHIBALI AVENUE .:•:♦:••.:•:LL.• 5'MC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST RANCHO OJCAMONGA,CA 917M PR0.CCT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STATION-CONVENIENCE S1OP 28. ' 20' 30' 0 I Q O1 CONSTRUCTION Tree EXISTING - 6D.5' 56 2 n=n O ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(G-Q LL SOUTH: GENERALINDUSTrAL IN) STORAGE . N j Ip Opjdil I 7-ELEVEN I Q EAST: GENERA INDUENTIAL(G) 0 BUILDING �. STORE xEST GENERAL INDUSTRIAL c-I pp 110x66 I'-'� ENsnxc zoxEuc c-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIA N ICI i• 6 600 SIF Q ENSnNG VIND USE: VACANT M PROPOSED ZUNING: G-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL W 4 N y PROPUSED LAID USE GROUND-UP GAS STAA0N- ON fl 1 N STONE Ipogel qq I— BUILDING INFORMATION: a7 E9.' NET ACREAGE: E73.314 SF I.fiB ACRES I. PROPSED = RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED BUIWING AREA E6W SF(i3,6005F PATO AREA) ➢q, I ELEC RICAL I PROPOSED RESTAURANT AREA: }zoos SF %8os U PROPOSED CONVENIENCE AREA E4,595 SF u r E METE N ° PROPOSED CANOPY AREA 3.I80 BF Ip048I 0> I. CABIl ET ILL BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWABLE BUILDING NEGRI 75 R Ng" iE e 0' Q Loi COYERACE: 13.3%(9.780 SF) LANDSCAPING LOT COVERAGE: 318R 23.306 Sf s F=o i/ DESIGNATED PROP)SED ORE SPRINKLERS REQUIRE: AS �i ° RESTAURANT 3, " TRAN FORM 1 PARKING _ REOUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS II maM ARaEBALo A STALLS T I ° w Ipoj�I ' FROM 91 STREET 25 FT F u (7) N • I SLUE 5 ET p . •� REAR OFT S D f -- 0... 8 ••125 5• ••'�'•'". 1 6` REQUIRED CANOPY VTBACRS 1 FROM ARCHBALD AVE 45 FT F \�\ >� FROM 91H STREET 25 R YI _' '• .•.�• •,'� 45'B ILDIN I REQUIRED LAN9scMNS SETRACKS n •.•• SETS CK I PIDETENTEkaR OFF •• .•.7S ".'."• SIDE(51REEQ 5R O N N m 1 N O F O REAR 0 FT O \\ O1 5 ' ' .ST'AC N.G.LLISIA E EXIST G FI I PARKING REQUIREMENTS W ®, ,. .• HYDR NT CONVENIENCE PARKING REQUIRED: 14 IS STALLS PER 1000 SF) N a CONVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED: 14—(PLUS ADDITIONAL 14 STALLS AT FUEL m T W y PROPOSED I RESTAURANT PARKING REWIRED: 20(RESTAURANT USE:10 PER IWO 47 ' m RESTAURANT PARKING PROVIDED: 22 S— c �c • 1 i ATER_ DESIGNATED I TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 34 STAlls UNCL.2 ACCESSIBLE @ BIKE RACKS) 0 j L ONVENIENCE i4 PR D TRMH M TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 36 S1ALL5(INCL 2 ACCESSIBLE 2 EV 8 BIKE RACKS) ' y y W V PR POS UTILITY INFORMATION: PROPOSED 9' DESIGNATED EN --PARKING ° UTILI Eac muwERx CALIFORNIA EDESW e = HEALY TANK '� CONVENIENCE �♦ S ARE rr GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY • • ST E (5) ULL L WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRCT ■:. ARK(G O E,p7C'X� MO EME T o STORM DRINK CITY of RAnaoLcucABBWcn STA LS 9 „ SANITARY SEWER. V r wATE 0-1 0-GA ALE @� � �a w R 'EW k REFusE cauEcnW: WRRTEc olsvosu j ffie 5) Al I SITE LEGEND �o® s PROPERTY LINE ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING g - - - = o I -•------•----- PATH OF TRAVEL SPACE EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK $ (E)UTILITY POLE I ( DRIVEWAY TO LANDSCAPE SETBACK (E)FIRE HYDRANT 15'W DRAINAGE& AINAGE BE REMOVED - - DEMO BUILDING 4 (E)STREET LIGHT UTILITY EASEMENT ZUTI WTDREASEMEN& -------- E O CONCRETE PAMNC/SIDEWALK \ I m (SCALE:1 � O STANDARD A.C.PAVING \ \ I OLANDSCAPE AREA SHEET CSP-9 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN z,SCAL=rE:-o^ 1 ®DECORARME PAVING KEYNOTES zz ❑[ ] ❑R❑❑❑❑R❑❑T❑❑ ❑00❑❑R Li ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑❑[�J❑❑❑❑OOR❑❑OOR❑ Z w w ❑N❑ R❑❑❑❑EMEI OJT❑N I' ❑IR ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑T❑ ❑❑N 110011❑R w w w � I I ❑N❑ ❑❑m❑❑NT ❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑R M❑N❑❑❑❑T❑R❑❑ U r, ❑❑❑❑❑❑❑TON❑❑ I I ❑ z z z z ® Q J J J (n N ❑[�[ MO❑ ❑N❑ ® w w w w > ❑❑ o �, > ❑[� Of ❑RO❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ DO R❑❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑0❑ N ❑ ❑❑❑ DO ❑0❑ o 0 0 0 0 Of Lj Ui w w w w I-- Of � ❑�J❑❑ ❑N❑ ❑❑❑ ❑ON❑❑d ❑OR ❑O❑T M❑ ❑N❑ ❑❑❑R❑❑❑ Ln N N N w w M❑❑H[�J❑❑❑ > > > > w w w w J J C� CC Of Of U U U O O O O O O O ❑ r7 r` N r` O 00 0 0 0 Ln 0 0 0 e❑ n Ln co r` co M ❑®111w' ❑w' ❑❑®❑❑7' ❑llf1j' ❑❑❑❑' ❑❑®❑�' COOLER FIRE VAULT FREEZER RISER ❑❑❑❑El El ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ 1 a o El ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 = COOLER VAULT ❑❑� ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ °° GENERAL NOTES ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ~ ❑❑ = o z '� ��, ti ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ IH ❑❑R❑❑NT❑❑❑ O❑ ❑❑❑OHO❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ z ❑ ElEl ❑ ❑ ❑�' q ❑❑❑❑ FIE] ❑❑❑❑❑❑ FIE El ❑❑ ElEl o L El 77. El CAVE TOT❑❑ ❑❑❑❑NLi ❑R❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ El ❑❑ 8 El BACKROOM ❑�' o ❑❑❑❑ ❑ w ❑H El8 ❑ �r7 ❑❑❑R ❑❑❑❑ ❑R❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ = O ❑❑❑ -. C❑' COD JEW❑ WOMENS MENS NOoDdro ❑ ENE] ❑❑❑❑❑ ❑R❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ _ RESTROOM ❑ RESTROOM- ❑ �� ❑ o �❑ o ❑ �� ❑❑❑ ❑❑❑ °° COOLER TOT[][] ❑❑❑OHO❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑R❑❑❑ ❑❑❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ L ❑❑ ❑❑ VAULT o l ❑❑❑ - El ❑ _ o 2 Elm, ❑®all ❑❑ J ❑�' ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑ m ❑❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑❑ ❑®❑❑Im' ® VLIA � ELI 2L ®❑ O n ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ o ❑❑ ❑❑ FOOD o ❑ 0 3 _ WINE W DDLI ❑ ElElEl ❑ ❑ ® DRooH oo R ❑LLW' ❑ ❑ e ❑_ OdrRDOH DDODC ❑M' o a _� 0 ❑❑ om TOo oR ❑3 DOrROOH DD �p�� DDC r� D OO ❑ ❑❑ ❑ Q El N El Lu 11m0 ❑ DOT �❑ p0p DDO m0�v�i W p 0 fn aO �O OdrRDOH En ❑11Li' ® N LU LU �0 DO FE o I D0o0 MERCHANDISE ® Q � UF 0 �J �O N ❑ 3 0D ❑❑ DoD "<of� o o a� 3 °W El a`o° N O N DINING L~ ❑❑ OFFICE DDOTOD OR ❑❑❑ W �� �O ❑°° OdfRDOH Doopo19 _- El a M®RO❑ 0 M❑T m � U)®T❑❑ uU a RD RD R7 RD U Q0 , - 0� ® o o a �❑ o o — a ° 06 Ll SALES F STORAGE "MEOW o Elo ❑❑❑ El u ❑❑ El El �O O ❑❑ ® ❑El 0 0 b B El El El ❑ El ❑ ❑ (D— o El ❑ e ❑ ,n ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 N 64 CD ❑WW' ❑IJ tl i' ❑IJ tl i' W O CV iJ Z O p U d W V) Z O ��yy wZ O Y O CD ❑❑❑®❑CEO' 7 d Z W 0 + 1y W N W O Q L Z S " Z U O (JJ U N Z O O LL O N w M 0 0 i 0 O N N � ❑H❑❑T❑ W W � N N � EEFM mz SCALE: � o ❑❑00 R ❑ ❑❑N ❑❑IT ❑ ❑m, =dada= ao a �" �aRnaer ITITIT M ...... .............................. T.O.LOC4NOPV (1) Z U � mQ as as as as as LU as J W ZQ� W a a a Lu >aU ❑ ............ LU .................. a a a a a ® W w J= A m Wum FINI9H FLOOR FINISH FLOOR Q t�Q Z W 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-EAST(FACING ARCHIBALD AVE.) SCALE: 2 1�� %ooS M-5 F � F � - C T�'O.PARPPEi .O.PNUPEf�' N W II Ul � a m M ' m T.O.LTC CPNOPY � U � � L { W A ❑ U o.CnrvoPv N�,!�6�I1 �@@ gg ageg 51 �5€ss� 2sy a a a a a a a a s a ��® s�� ........................ a FINISH FLOOR FINISH FLOOR ^ E�= r� d 2 SHEET: A3.0 EXTERIOR ELEVATION WEST(STOREFRONT) a/1sALEo^ �d d 0 0 o: rnr o�dgBR �n zao rc �vanAPer� tes c) T.o.cwovr o Q Z Mx O _Z WU F ZK WZ W W -Za° w O Wpm Jrc W90 O =o W 'FINISH FLOCK FINISH FLOOR' n U W QU W Q � 2 x 1 4 5 2 3 5 ���' ' D B C E E E _E E E E H C. EXTERIOR ELEVATION EAST(FACING ARCHIBALD AVE.) SCALE: 2 Pid PO R F 9 Egp g�g' gill F 1 2 5 3 2 8 2 3 C A F G F A c o a x T.O.PPFAPEf T.O.PARA� � � N W I� YT.O.LTC CANOPY � 0 � � L .gggsas R-H 0'_ s E s a N -5 SUN m Immul YFINISM FLOOR FINISH FLOOft�' � �`�•��� 2 SHEET: A3.00 Eli EXTERIOR ELEVATION WEST(STOREFRONT) SD"LE' 1 KEYNOTES ao a �" ITITIT �'T.O.VARAPET i.0.PANAPET�' 14'E' OOANOPY TO LTC OAN� Qm X Mm� Z 4'T O.GWOPY iO.GANppyY ZU MFU O Z� WZ W Za0 W e aWo _j 0>aU Jp Wm❑ W w J=U W hh A m woo � FFLOOR FINISH FLOOR _ Q K W EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE 2 1�� W %ooS M-5 F � F � - C �'T O.PAMFET � N TO.PANAPET�' V1 a m M ' m x14'E" c cnrvoPv m c e T.O.GWOPY ... EJ �MUCH A A - FINISHFLOOR r� d 2 SHEET: A3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-SOUTH MATERIAL SAMPLES �d d a a<< -,--__ 'a a a a a a a 1 i 6 " a a s_ W:m VINTAGEWOODCEDAR EMPIREBLOCKGRAY NICHIHA NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT SIDING FIBER CEMENT PANELS o C n n« 1 3 D A F E C 96 `e- io.LTCGw $ 154DARKBRONZE SILVERPOINTE-SW 7653 Two.LTC Cnrvow CENTRIA-ECONOLAP I/2" SHERWIN WILLIAMS � CORRUGATED METAL SIDING m , II . M�axO _PV T.o cuw Z� �x< 0 ® ZK WZ W W Za0 W p W�� O �-0' ItW w Jx0 �'FINISN GLOOR FNSMFLOO�R�' TRICORN BLACK-SW 6258 REFLECTIVE WHITE-SW 7757 11 WQO w SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWIN WILLIAMS < Q x K - C E C E C E E H E C. EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE: 2 Pid�■ FINISHES 1 EIFS SYSTEM � � w FINISH:STUCCO 8 $8g MFR: - 6; fig$ eSTOREFRONT _ m i C FINISH:ANODIZED ALUMINUM g'pe B MFR: R» nZ 089 eFIBERCEMENTSIDING R FINISH:VINTAGEWOOD-CEDER ^ MFR: NICHIHA s a g eFIBER CEMENT PANELS FINISH:EMPIREBLOCK-GRAY MFR: NICHIHA e5 CORRUGATED METALSIDING FINISH:DARK BRONZE MFR: CENTRIA N _� c y T PnxnPEr = T'0- ,u a METAL CLADDING P FINISH:EMPIREBLOCK-GRAY 7y a T m MFR: a x T�O.LTC Gu m $ MATERIAL SAMPLES = ° $T.Oaea�wP VINTAGEWOOD-CEDAR � - e NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT SIDING R��€ess !PURP==a- eEMPIREBLOCK GRAY _ ® _ NICHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL scdHmaa 154 DARK BRONZE c `-`G gm� g ma saa e CENTRIA �2e� RE F�'INISN BOOR FINISH FLOOR SILVERPOINTE-SW 7653 e SHERWIN WILLIAMS E A B E D TRICORN BLACK-SW 6258 E SHERWIN WILLIAMS @ REFLECTIVE WHITE-SW 7757 LS a SHERWIN WILLIAMS 2 ePMS 165 SHEET: BLACK A3.1 C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-SOUTH MATERIAL SAMPLES `sk55355 gZ WW-212 A a s s s AESTHETIC WHITE SW7035 PANTONE'PO-040C' SHERWIN WILLIAMS BOLLARD COVER,TYP. 1 ^ A o� z•a as ra ,� z-v '� B.O.CWp COLONNADE GRAY SW764, SHERWIN WILLIAMS _STORE SIDE STREET SIDE n I(') cam] N ; i 2 U� f0�a MEYER B Z., Z as W ZK *UZ W W_ ❑o W i W�. O m z LLLL Ww WOO U _ n— Be mO fermi' Ja= W o W +bS FINISH FLOOR D R' 3 C O® EXTERIOR ELEVATION NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE: 1 � W FINISHES e ACM CANOPY FASCIA v e Fa §001 � e CANOPYCOLUMN g I R& 1gjl 2 e3 PARKING BOLLARD PLASTIC COVER FINISH:PANTONE'PO-040C' MFR: T.B.D. 5 it it it it 1 tl ara,. i.o.cnNORr v 4 N � x N � NI'Sn V1 � e.o.c�oRr v T m m � Y g mr B io° gg .g.p- � $ t'S �rip2 W NINO cEl OOR DO FINISH FL MATERIAL SAMPLES d eAESTHETIC WHITE-SW 1035 SHERWIN WILLIAMS a eCOLONNADE GRAY-SW-1 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHEET: g PANTONE-P0440C A3.2C g EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST 114°__"Eo. 1 e T.B.D. KEYNOTES INTERCOM CALL B-MECHANICALLY FASTENEU TO COLUMN. i MWNT AT 461NCHES MA%.ABOVE SIAB TO BUTTON _ Ed OFIRE E%iINGUISHER-ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE MAK.1&INCHES FROM GRADE TO PAPER TOWEL OPENING g �3 -ET dFEETRLUMINATED LOGO SIGN(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) r S S S S S OTATE—A IMAGE TRISTRIPE(NON-ILLUMINATED) OOVERFLOW PROTECTION AS REQUIRED.SEE CANOPY DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIQANONS n N �B WASHBUCKET ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE MAK. 14CHES FROM GRADETO PAPER rc TOWEL OPENING GASDISPENSER - OCANOPY COLUMN O\ ACM CANOPY FASCW i - T�GNpp Y o NOT USED s _ o NOT HE. Ra.CANOPY o NOT DGEO 4 9 B 13 PARKING BOLLARD STORESIDE STREETSIDE Ln N z F° O Z v=a a _z C) w Zrc_ mz w W 0 z > B W> wo wU�H > Z O aN LLQ J¢ wUU a _j W w o Inl Ja= IJ B�. a LL1 z FINISH FLW = a w K 13 T TYP. TYP. EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE: 2 1�� W iE %ooS ah, F � F � T-V 11 21" J - J - J J 3 1I 1I 11 1I it it it it ]'$' 1 T.O O Q N Y = N y � W G B.O. O T m m m x c m US AO U R 0 MUMS—I 13 FINISH F a SHEET: A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST ,4°A;Eo. 1 (2)WHORIZOMABPR AT TOP BOND BEAM GENERAL NOTES 2d'OVERLAP AROUNOGORNERS. S'X S'X 1S'PRECISION BLOCKSOUG 1. TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOW: GROUT INTERIOR SURFACE TO BE SMOOTH A ROOF WITH A MINIMUM CLEARANCE HEIGHT TO ALLOW THE BIN LID TO COMPLETELY i ANDNONABSORBANT.APPLVAIPHATIC OPEN R . _ UEI EGLOSSENPMEL-DEVTHAN— CMU WALL GAP tt B.CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED MASONRY WITHOUT WOODEN GATES,AND WALL BY IC.DEVOE COATING OVER EPDXY (COL— SHALL BE AT LEAST S FEET HIGH. PRIMER-TRU GLAEE WB d030 BY ICI. MATCH WALL) C,PROVISION OF CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR. STUCCO PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. D.ALL TRASH BINS INTHETRASH ENCLOSURESHALSEIEANPROOFWITH UDSTHAT p a Q Q Q z EXTERIOR FINISH STUCCO PAIM ARECONTINUOUSLYKEPTGLOSED, u _ MIN.2 COATS TO MATCH BUILDING N -- 9 r--- ❑o INTERIOR ANORIZONTAL REBAR AT TOP S MID HEIGHT SIDE W VERTICAL REBAR AT 16 O.G.IN PGG FILLED CELLS WITH ALTERNATE BENDS Q\ N ry GA.METAL WEEP SCREED 321 A4 GONT REBAR TOP AND BOnOM 'CLEAR FROM EDGE OF FOUNDATION "' ^4 3"OUR. A15 fi Y :.21 ....: WALL SECTION P,gC-- 1 BIM A1.5 n M N n 0 U M�a wU) Z> G) > �a❑ 8 8 9 8 B ;p W Jp Q O PO T.G.ENCLOSURE i.O.ENCLOSURE Lu >a ZZ FRAMING h FRAMING J p �f,�m❑ Q S Lu W1O zd U Ir Qp F J Q Q ry tltl = p P. W A1.5 REF.GML ENCL.S go CIVIL ENCLOSURE ELEVATION S°ALE: 6 ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: C HEALY ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 4 KEYNOTES � • 3l8'=1'-0" 3/8'=1'-0' J 3l8"=1'-0" 1 W �1 T"THICK KC LOADING PAD OVER 9D%COMPACTED BASE,4%MAXIMUM SLOPE. 13 12 SLOPE PF—PVC SLEEVES IN CONCRETE TYP. DI-PER FT. ➢q m B.O.ENCLOSURE ROOFh �3 fi'PCC CURB AROUND INSIDE PERIMETER OF ENCLOSURE. %ooS B.O.ENCL.ROOF �4 fi'PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH CONCRETE TYP.OF 5. opt p_g TYP. T TYP. s 9 6 14 �5 [ S'XS'X1fi PRECISON BLOCKWITH STUCCO FINISH _ 6U[ 6gpo i TO.ENCLOSURE FIT Io SU O 10"XPXIA-SOLIDCONCRETECPP. N (3)HEAVYDUTY METAL HINGE,COMNUOUSLYWELDEDTOGATE ANDJAMSTUBE. L f 131S'CORRUGATED META PANEL WELDED TO-META ANGLE WITH DIAGONAL r p TYP § S 1 ) 9 BRACING,CONTIN000S WELDALJOINTS:PRIMEANDVAINT. `` e SlIS'META PLATE WITH SUDE BOLTASSEMBLY WELDED IN PLACE. r — C 11 10 9 CANE BOLT MID CANE BELT RECEPTACLE . ENCLOSURE tiE 1�1 S'RAISED PPC WAKWAV. ❑ NO IL 1.5 3 Q, S ENCL SLABA a a - -- -- S 1�2 HSS SM---BEAM(TYP.) rr f N N v. w p o 13 SHEET META ROOFING,OVERHANG PAST CMU WALL BELOW FTYP.) N a B 5 b ]1Y114'STEEL COLUMN,PAINTED IB'EMBED,11Px312'SO PLWELD ASA-FROM Q ' L9 SCALE: 4C.Y.DUMPGtER 4GY.DUMPSTER '❑° TDP x SIDE ENCLOSURE ELEVATION 3 m i PROVIDEo9r w PRD DERBY w i m 3l8"=1'-0" OTHERS O OTHERS l o OILIGRE45E 15 GIITTERWIDOWNSPOUTDISCHARGINGATAD ENTLANDSCAPEARE4 q L CDNTAINER -°, rn - ❑ U T t t 0 2'FASCN a1.5 �e ,z 13 to _ T.O.ENCLOSURE 14 g —ENCLOSURE fi FRAMING - ��e5 T ] TYEl P. y n LJ LJ� 2— ENREF CMBL 2 e A15 SHEET: S 10 8 5 B A1.5 FRONT ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 1 _PK ql - ', - J T, • Y, 1 . +»• yi• '`�._-'. ►� �.i ems' .� IMF � i. `�,..l •e��;+'^��� ,i" ",,i�",iw�"_ f awl "'+ \ �,. y, 1.w-- Ci•'.'�� r , .f. r r R a • � T l,r i I Te xEDOO _�i'°x.,,s':a ���`^y�.j�■ry��'i -�",�'�: ' W `i+'� _7!. .Jl�+. _ ... ram•' ,.�.jF. .r. � ' d \ - - M1. '4.� .d,. •+f• �.a�, /r!.-F` -.>il..•..1_- .� �i�:"L:' ,:�•i.'�S.Y�:.. +n -3�' '''i` _i i .�.. n'i' �� �� 1 r� .r_ .)•}.�17�`.._ •_Zv.�ysc�' -.�. r - ..�'� r. - . • � - +aY�..F=`+1.J�a 1/�s� s- ..7 ,a'�?•+�'T..5's r:�'>.i� .7Y../�'.T'=.�-'�7. �`i 4': : - � �` -� j I %' _ - ���I�� -m.:'•,: k- -tF`�":, �e} !++ 'f � •,- �.:ry�^"T� ,�x�. _ "r.. -'we'.j..:.•.M�yu�:-y r,�:,,�T �?I�y- c�t.y'� �•� __ �.�'�r-� '� � - \ f• - �a ' a-, •F' ��c >��.' ♦ - ... .y ��.g y,.r, �.`-�';.i{• $ `.•r'L ti-;� 7 •y•... •� I.. \.. . - N.�. �r1iGa��. �.�T '-'+°�v�+x�. �.��r:,u.� W .•..x• :�fr"�,aV•.. 1'. �vz-.�?'r '�` ai•• _ �" 4 �., 'G�' - ,1}��.•• '., •:I J„_' - -"lr.F? � s i.ti _•r••i . . . . � � .'�,_ tw r �. dr. `;• �i.• - li.. 1 •.-ZY' I I �- .c �l •4<�`�` i '•' .sue °it,:. 1'.. SS :ir • . • - :� � . . v ��ry s� -y.+�s"�,��. �,, ��`•� �r �' �a. ,�,,_ ,'+��. � s.- .�, - _-,y�� 4� y _ � _:ICY � ;''r°���. _ .i_ �,. �n :'� `�'Ykl.r-��.� ,�r:. � w f !�,r f+ _ r 7" _ - � •. -�.r;y��.i�+ ►. .�r '� _ '1•�s� s+� '�' �_iF. � i �� - � -r III 4 1 r'�; k d' } r r'a A I it-.n a a.tiac�k ra R�rae�a nwow�Y�r I • F r{ , 7.�41�!f/1�0'•A.,tY[Y■aW'F.,i/lISPRJPY i� 'ILFRf.J4 h YsJY�iF/1JR. -f ,� ae ITT .l,p 1 66 4' , r 1'• r Cn:15.L. .hl!•f1'1.!!'Lf!iiriAA3ri1 g•' S• y y7 5+kwer rrx. r•.r'� f IF - . r'.;�' I 'I':'I �:1 f'. �'� �.'1 .r•' I 1 !' •?� .:c „i' .f,r I -1 �r!d. '.' .I'' [ � .'� .i' • ti S � 1 r t f J # k� t r�r.••i � �- - Tim ' +* t'rr I fix • 1 r • F + * per_' . _-`. ,� + `i • 4 - _ '< ri ti 5' •; ery ..f r � F I r ' J • yl f _ r � F � w �wr^ � f� � � � J� '�T � � „�� -r ' w ' I r all - y + +� • ! � � yr� � . . . � � 1 rrFrF� `�`{ �` � • I � - I M d � Ark• r. - •;�• '+`' ^�.•'`- ,.<�.. r :k �i -*n .,• fry .'� _ - � :� •. ..J `a ;��=- - � � � — r �� ` jL y.r P r;" S• *� �� 1 1 1 1 PLANTING LEGEND - - TREES SYMBOL TREE NAME QTY. WUCOLS STREET TREE ALONG 9TH STREET CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA, CAMPHOR TREE 4 M 9TH STREET 24" BOX SIZE. 30'-0" Q.C. R.D.W. _ PROPOSED MONUMENT y a a d SIGN PER ARCH, DWGS. STREET TREE ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE �� a"-4 PLATANUS RACEMOSA, CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 5 M 'i --- - i 24 BOX SIZE. 30-0 O.C. N ° tj ■ °7 BIKE RACK PER ° f ° QUERCUS VIRGINIANA, SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 6 M ARCH. DWGS. $ ' , f" PATIO PER 4 e 36 BOX SIZE. STANDARD TRUNK. r ARCH. DWGS. ° d• .ea e ■ e ddd r�..r a "• d- 4' 4 f4 PARKING LOT SHADE TREE TREE p ao o ■ -4 - a •d e P.L. 4: QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK 5 L - 24" BOX SIZE. d ° q d ■ 4. a © d d llllll 4 SECONDARY PARKING LOT TREE 6 L COMMERCIAL A PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR, FERN PINE 15 GAL. SIZE. STORAGE d ¢ A' p R.O.W. w n 4 EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE AT PROPERTY LINE p 013 cm ° '. •' GEIJERA PARVIFLORA, AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 14 M 7—ELEVEN W 15 GAL. SIZE. o STORE Q FLOWERING ACCCENT TREE pDOo wp r Q CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM', PALO VERDE s 11 L 36" BOX SIZE. y. ¢ ° r . ■ x _ •" ALTERNATE: LAGERSTROEMIA I. 'NATCHEZ' f y ■ 0 _ y dd ' a ■ SHRUBS - PROPOSED SHRUBS WILL BE SELECTED FROM THE FOLLOWING: p ap o ➢ ° °4�: /`/ // SYMBOL SHRUB NAME WUCOLS d q a LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER d TRANSFORMER ■ L ■ 5 GAL. SIZE o a PER ARCH. DWGS. p E)a =1 ° "a a ■ PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'MONUS', BRIGHT 'N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL .4 L e .r d ° 4° d. ' 15 GAL. SIZE d ° d 4 r., .d ` EVERGREEN SCREEN f f Y f - WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY SHRUBS AROUND $ p L TRANSFORMER. 5 GALLON d 5 GAL. SIZE SIZE MINIMUM o - 4 opp �� ^ a �T CALL I STEM ON 'LITTLE JOHN', LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH ; 5 GAL. SIZE L °r 41 W lL W 4, W W w ,L W a . LAURUS NOBILIS, SWEET BAY L d d 15 GAL. SIZE w W W W w w w f ° — — V+ w w w f LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM', WAXLEAF PRIVET M w w w ti v v ti 5 GAL. SIZE w W W w W W ROSMARI NUS 'TUSCAN BLUE', TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY 5 GAL. SIZE L DODONAEA VISCOSA, HOPSEED BUSH _- 15 GAL_ SIZE M fp 0/lx TRASH ENCLOSU GROUND COVER AND SHRUB MASSES PER ARCH. DWG RE SYMBOL GROUND COVER/SHRUB MASS NAME WUCOLS r LANTANA 'GOLD RUSH', LANTAN GOLD RUSH L .:", v w 1 GAL. SIZE @ 24" O.C. w SENECIO REPENS, BLUE CHALKSTICKS ' L 1 GAL. SIZE ALOE 'BLUE ELF', BLUE ELF ALOE 1 GAL. SIZE ' --- — - P.L. ALOE STRIATA, CORAL ALOE L 1 GAL. SIZE t SALVIA 'BEE'S BLISS', BEE'S BLISS SAGE L 1 GAL. SIZE SALVIA 'ALLEN CHICKERING', ALLEN CHICKERING SAGE GENERAL NOTES: IRRIGATION NOTE: 5 GAL. SIZE L ■ SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOW FLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', PROSTRATE ROSEMARY GROUND COVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' OF ET WEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOW FLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR 1 GAL. SIZE L MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL. DRIP SYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATION WATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THE CURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATER ORDINANCE. BACCHARIS P. 'TWIN PEAKS', DWARF COYOTE BRUSH ■ ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES 1 GAL. SIZE L CONNECT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. TYP. EROSION CONTROL DROUGHT TOLERANT BANK PLANTING SUCH ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE WUCOLS PLANT FACTOR AS BACCHARIS MIXED WITH ASSORTED GRASSES. M DETECTOR CHECKS AND FIRE CHECK VALVES WILL BE SCREENED WITH THIS PROJECT 15 LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS' EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCE FINAL LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN REGION '4-SOUTH INLAND VALLEY'. DETENTION BASIN BOTTOM SHALL RECEIVE A HYDROSEED MIX M DETERMINED. w w CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: H = HIGH WATER NEEDS M = MODERATE WATER NEEDS ■ ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM 1.0 LBS/ ACRE CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE: L = LOW WATER NEEDS • ESCHSCHOLZIA CAESPITOSA 1.0 LBS/ACRE VL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS ■ JUNCUS BUFONIUS 1.0 LBS/ ACRE THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARY ■ LEYMUS TRITICODIDESRIO 6.0 LBS/ ACRE INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLY VERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE_ IT IS • DESCHAMSIA DESPITOSA 4.0 LBS/ACRE MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID IN EXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT ■ FESTUCA RUBRA 'MOLATE' 10.0 LBS/ ACRE STRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIES INDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AS MORE ■ HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM 6.0 LBS/ACRE RELIABLE INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. ■ MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 1.0 LBS/ ACRE ■ MUHLENBERGIA MICROSPERMA 3.0 LBS/ ACRE ■ HORDEUM DEPRESSUM 3.0 LBS/ ACRE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 201 401 60' NORTH SCALE: 1 11 = 201-011 7- ELEVEN RN ER OF 9TH STREET & ARCHIBALD AVENUE 1 SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. 2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAY ELEVEn DATE: 12/09/2020 FALLBROOK, CA 92028 RANCHO C CA `� PH: 760-842-8993 Lml W W W W W W l W W W EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS ADJACENT TO EX.TRANSFORMER. W W 5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM P.L. EX.TRANSFORMER PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 \ m \ / APPLICANT (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 ° APN 02 CHASE ORBIS EaSTEVAIE,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA Z NG: GENE L IN ST IAL p II \ \ / APN: 0209-041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE v ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 m \ / (949)330-7562 TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 0 -=TEOH N. 25- - HI / UTILITY PROVIDERS w n NINTH STREET EX.SERVICE\ J / I STORM: BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PUBUC WORKS 909 387-7995 PROP.40'DRIVEWAY PER 259' / r BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 909 297-14]0 BUD DWG.101 TYPE C \ ; / CITY OF RANCGO CUCAMONGA 909 477-2]40 SEVER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 98]-2591 EX.PULL BOX TO REMAIN - -C4-- - I \ WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 987-2591 1124.89 TO 11280]TC 1124.89 FS RELOCATE EX.SIGN I REMOVE AND \ ° GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 909 335-7955 E%.FIRE HYDRANT 1124.25 EL 1124.45 FL m 1124.8fi Fs- PROP. S/W REPLACE RAMP ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 909 329-9445 ° TN REMAIN 1125--A - TELEPHONE: AT&T 800 331-0500 EX.TRAFFIC SIGNAL PN: 0209-054-79 CABLE: CHARIER CABLE 909 975-3398 N I EX.R/W n - AND PULL BOX TO / 5 _ - N89'50'01'W 219.46'= REMAIN ; v> m : MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) EX.TREE TO REMAIN 1124.B9 BW.. ��112456 FS •• --.. ... �• 6r N i �/' '.'.1124.61,FS'.'.'..'.N44'0UIUU 2].95' vl, �-1125- EX.LIGHT i0 REMAINS L 1124.69 BW I '�1124.]8'FS ."44 BUILDING; \ PROPOSED RAMP SITE DATA 1124.93 TC '1125.06 TC _ 1124.]4 F5 SETBACK x 1124.26FL '.`. 1124.56 FS ''''''"� '.'.�'.;.�. ; I \ SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE L ?¢m \ / RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 1124.81TC 1124.57T 1124.68F5' o• 1123.]2 . I EX. TRAFFIC SIGN L O um 6 5 11243]FS - 9 �i o ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-0000 _ 1124.07 FS PROPOSED BIKE RACK - AND PULL BOX TO / 1124.74 TC' - REMAIN `n 5 1123.21 TC .N 112424 F5 PROPOSE ', 'y` 3),„(({'''45'BUILD 'PROPOSED THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES. RIVERSIDE 1122.]t FS \jam,, GREASE n\/ .'.1'.).'SETBACK ING 1 I 11 I COUNTIES PAGE 6021NIRD j VERS "o .1123.501P'20• .. .. ......... I / {I I u X _, - INTERCEPTOR Y.......:1 1 MONUMENTS 1 ZONING/LAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1 ---- / N a oap 1123.61T1117.73TNV 1124.18 S o 1118821NV { / EX SIDEWALK I,i 3 0l FEMA: FEMA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. ^T 1+�i•1 ''•" •• 1. = I TO REMAIN / �I APN: 0209-054-80 FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA E O 111].591NV ...... \ - / ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC SUBJECT TO I PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOW EVENT .m a3� 112435 FF "" 6 ' / ) LEGEND CONSTRUCTION NOTES w o 5[ I 1124.35 FS... PROP.FIRE WATER L 1122.OFS -'1124.35F5'�'�-'... PROP DOMES PROPERTY LINE O x ^ n- - 605' TIC WATER ---- 1 CONCRETE CURBLi n e O I , 11. 1124.35 FF ry PROP.IRRIGATION WAIERI / - CENTER LINE w o O2 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER o� --________ z 5.' 28.' 20 30 20' 6' ,„ 56.1', 56' 44.96' -\ O •- ®�i _ t I ----- EASEMENT OR SETBACK LINE 3 3'WIDE VALLEY GUTTER Y t Il+oi•II f ... 9 01 I ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL O4 ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH DETECTABLE - I ice. 1.5. I ' n I - GRADE BREAK WARNINGS 1124.20TC: 1124.35 FF o- ..w I \ 3 O \ \ PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 5 CURB CUT 1123.70FS ]ELE\fN I XX.XX T STORE \� X%.XX FS UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN WITH GRAVEL PAD i 6,000 SF \\ I ty� 111435 EF -- o \ vNi / + XX.XX TC EXISTING SPOT GRADE 7 BIORETENTION BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS o \ 11z3a5 pnn / / XX.X%FS AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE E - gIn DETAIL 1,SHEET 2. PROPOSED PROPOSED FLOW / p ELECTRICAL \ /3 / 1 I 2.00% (DIRECTION AND SLOPE) O B AND OVERFLOW BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS n q METER CABINET1124.26 FS �\/ / I I AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE 5 PARCEARMAP 8653 �z \ I+oi•I 1124.35 FS 6 / °I _ DETAIL 2.SHEET 2. o $" I I - LANDSCAPE/ m PROPOSED °1124.18 � 4.6. �1121.97 TC)'?tf I PLANTER AREA O9 BIOSWALE 90/21-22 �r 20 TRANSFORMER.. 1124.14'F5 2 1�12149 FL \\\ j o 10 HEADWALL O E. 112241 TO o �T _ 9 1121 6 1121.85 TC STANDARD DUTY >° ________ B III 1.91FS1+ i+1 1122.]FL \ 11 CATCH BASIN o 0 EX.RIBBON 11 ... � ... 1121 37 FL / CONCRETE PAVEMENT CUTER TO REMAIN '.'.'.'... "' "" "'1119.OTFG / / ° -J Ed 1122.88TC, - EX.PL 1122.38FS .1123.04'FS: : '.1121.05 FS :EX R WTI.. ] N \ 1 APN: 0209-054-82 ° T7T 1i22.8iTP 10 / \ / ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) p` cs _ � ::'S .. . sorc m\/ 3 / I lQ _ ESTIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES �� o - PROPOSED- -� q 1119.56 FL \ I - - _ OIL&WATER PROPOSED ::: 21121.001'C,,,, .� I I CUT: 153 CY SEPARATOR 1120.00 FG.' 1 O AIR&WATER _ ^Y /m T �� a 95"' U FILL 5,457 CY 1T122.37TC 1120 m nQA^° PROP.SEWER FS 1121.42 TC ,l 3 112068 FL 1120�65 TC O `�^\� / NET: 5,304 Cy FILL ` Ui f '" T1113.38INV 1120.92 FL L,\� 8 \ 1120 1120.15 FS 1 Q NOTE:THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING GROUND pµry rE 1109.4]IN TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT GRADES ON m$ __ THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON THE >e /w 1121.93 TO 1121.52 TC 11 _ 1120.32 TC° - \ / GRADING PLAN(S). Q w PROPOSED HEALY 1121.43 FL 2 1121.02 TO 1P' 1119.82E Z 1v ERID E : PRO PGEED I' 1121.27 TCI 3 2 EX.FlRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN I ACCOUNTHE RTHFNNCHANGESEIN ABOVE VOLUME REDUER TO BIULKINGPOCLEARING ANDS ONLY, GRUBBING HAW ?SHR NKAGEEEN �ROVERED � _ 0 9 LOT LINE e 112077,FL EXCAVATION AND RE-COMPACTION, N 5 C i FOR THE /^ \��.•..• 1121 1120e� .. '.'.\' 1`PR OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINS,DSLABS,CONSTRUCTION OF E PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW EW •�v I OP.40'DRIVEWAY PER \ PAVEMENTS, ETC, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ESTIMATES FOR BIDDING x ---------- --- N89'49'29"W 236119 S 111955 Tf. --- 1119.5 Tf ••a b T STD.TWO.101 TYPE C I° \ PURPOSES. J a E* ) 111011TC. -7 1119.21 TC \ Iy/ PRoposeD TRasH n18A1T LEGAL DESCRIPTION /L�u �� n$ I/ - ENCLOSURE) I) \` I\\ IT / PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS,PAGE 21 AND yV 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. ^ 9 EX.RIBBON EX.DRIVEWAY / LL _ GUTTER To REMAIN- o BE BENCHMARK PARCEL 1 REMOVE EXISTING -m REMOVED) d S -- - a PARKING WTHIN / I 2'BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB STAMPED"CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10041A 2009"AT THE --- PARCEL MAP 1528 N SHARED ACCESS 1 \ / No CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE 1.0!WESTERLY FROM THE END OF PMB 14/56 Q E%.TRANSFORMER CURB RETURN ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.ELEVATION 1207.70 0 o RE-STRIPE TO E ACCOMMODATE n \ o E APN: 0209-032-34 ADDITIONAL 3 0 EASEMENT NOTES ¢ ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARKING z \ \ / I APN: 0209-054-78 SITE AREA ° •\ \ \ 3 1, EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND J \ v, ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED TOTAL SITE AREA I.8]ACRES J ry APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164,PAGE 144]OF _ EXISTING BUILDING \ \ / / 1 OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA I.7]ACRES to w °- Q4 2. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES ~I. • _-____--_ 4 \ \ I R \ / 80 8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04.1984 ON FILE IN fV W BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF PARCEL MAPS EXISTING PERVIOUS I.]8 ACRES Z ul I 589'S000"E 235.06' PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES ~w E i w8 _ rca ______ - u ------------- \ \�^ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES _� a U REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES Ow LU Q aa� W °o PARCEL 2 -__--- -_-- PARCEL MAP 1528 ILL a- H w F _ EMS 14/56 I \\ \\ I I W a LL.O APN: 0209-032-37 -- -----ll \ \\ / APN: 0209-054-76 NORTH ILL W 3 Z 3= ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ / } ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) n IY J, O co G4RAPHIC SCALE IN FEET p_' E FLOOD ZONE X FLOOD ZONE A\ i Nr� o s 3D fio O = 1$ IN IX / I I SHEET NUMBER SE, n 4s�W602, w 1 OF2 d� aM±r,�w4F a4MS Beas a�E Vlasaz,ramJ-3(zawl ­1 PRIIgg i 8 mxxa R W EAL LxntiW(a-14 DU/x) 1128 112E �EOH EOH NMm-/S (N sc FG 27. r 9 ,Ex noE I p L ... EL-o' 1124 MA 1124 .. EG 1120 I.a�Y muu(e�e w/AC) 113. 9 ax 5.6, 28.5 20' 30' 20' S/W 60.5 S/W 56' S6' A LANDSCAPE DRIVE GAS DRIVE ARKING BUILDING LANDSCAPE HALF-STREET -- AISLE PUMPS AISLE ARCHIBALD BLVD 1118 =ry m x o 1114 1114 O w E 0.. - 2 11+00 12+00 13+00 L7 »:...... is o a- m, HORIZON o-4�AD SECTION A— GJ w oo fi 9 TAIL SCALE 1"=30" 'z O .......... E2 F VERTICAL SCALE 1"-3' � o HR W o. 28 1128 IS T rfi m 1 FG z f o D ueszs 2R 2% W p 0 1124 MA% TAX- 1124 _ b' i I EG k s$ _ _ 1120 1120 n� <o F.u./sss" 4. a. ado m _37 -`LA SC APE S/W S/W 29' u- Ixc xum1.x(a4 Du Ac) 30' HALF-STREET o 16' DRIVE AISLE 19' 35' 111' 53' 23' NINTH ST ` - TRASH ARKING LANDSCAPE BUILDING PADO LANDSCAP rc[SECTION M A r 1116 ENCLOSURE 1116 1'-50' 1114 1114 z EX. Ex' 21+00 22+00 23+00 O SOVIHERLY NORTHERLY R/W R/W m 5 (66') o F (29•) (37) n0'> n9) 25') n2) SECTION B—B W o$ 2E'X.M�, HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=30" E IXVEMEM DERING _Ex.CURBVERTICAL SCALE —3PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER IX.CURB 18^TO BIORETEN110N BOTTOM n S k GUTTER k GUTTER ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN \ 3n ADJGINING SIZE STRUCNRES PER PLAN o E PROP,SIDEWALK BASE COURSE o p COMPACTED SUB-GRADE _ 2_4^OF OVERFLOW - } 2-4^OF OVERFLOW - MULCH DRAIN ?P MULCH DRAIN NINTH STREET - NOT TO SCALE J o t Ex. EASTERLY r--=lall -I=1 T-i _- -->i- N_ W 5 e WESTERLY ENGINEERED II II II-III I_ ENGINEERED o$ R/W SOIL MEDIA 1311 -I_I -II III- SOIL MEDIA Z D. R/W (VARIES 100'-1044) _' (60-80,: IJ'I-I� -11 III-I (60-80% 0= a (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96') ASTM C33 -III II ASTM C33 O Q U �� 4 20ND40% -,IIFII I 20N40Y. �a LU�I (VARIES) (VARIES 41.5'-455't) (32') (12.96') COMPOST -1'I-' COMPOST -W a PER WOMP - PER WOMP Z a~Z W (VARIES 5' REPORT) REPORT) W W D)U F a y 3 IXISi.AC c'i < U Y N F 0 i 5 PAVEMEM Ex.MEANDERING V• `"°Vh '-"� W Q.W R O J= Ex.SIDEW01_K IX.CURB IX.CURB SIDEWALK J J d 3 Q k CURER k GUTTER 6 PERFORATED 6 PERFORATED W W 3 Z U rMZO5 WRAP EN DIR MIL PVC PIPE WRAP EN RE IL PVC PVC PIPE h Z U - BASE COURSE NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO p5] NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO p5] (q ro O $$ COMPACTED SUB-GRADE GRAVEL GRAVEL m N U 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA ARCHIBALD AVENUE cRAVEL GRAVEL O EY NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER DETAIL-1 DETAIL-2 p 2�F 2 a€ 811YnnA N.T.S. N.T.S. : BMP INSPECEION/MAINTENANCFACWIR6 LEGEND c RFSPONSIBIE PARTYIS) REQUIRED MINIMUM FREQUENCY Of ACIIVIflFS EOH EO — -1125� _ \ EOH`-�: OWNER WILL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/HERSELF I \ V RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINE a EDUCATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS,TENANTS, WITH THE EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS PROVIDED NINTH STREET AND OCCUPANTS ON STORMWATER BURNS OWNER \ ;� - CENTERLINE YEARLY / ° (BMP NI) W-NTHISWOMPANG EDUCFTETENANTS _ _ - _ _ - a AND EMPLOYEES. / K� DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY GARDENING AND LAWN CARE PRACTIICESTO _———1125 LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT IBMP N3) OWNER PREVENT LANDSCAPE WATER FROM EXITING WEEKLY _ \ \ / -—-(147)-—-EXISTING CONTOURS THE PROJECT SITE. 14] PROPOSED CONTOURS HAZARDOUS WASTES AS DEFINED BYTTLE 22 _ ............ TIE 22 OCR COMPLIANCE IBMP NE) OWNER CCR WILL BE MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONGOING 'S "� .r EH. .! \ \/ / —�—F—F_£_FLOW LINE n THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTALH—I. 23 : .. z DEPARTMENT. PROP.BIOSWALE STESPECIFIC SPILLCOMINGENCl PLAN SHALL o I\ \ O T BMP IH3, - I SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN \ \ / S SPILLCONTINGENCYPIANIBMPN71 OWNER BEMADEAVAIIABI£FORTENANTSAND ONGOING \ S4,SS E'T - \ III EMPLOYEES. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN \r OWNERS TO ABIDE BYTHE STATE,COUNTY, \- 1122 _ o o` J'•' 2 I \ \ Z r UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK COMPLIANCE AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH \ BMP N3, \ ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN OWNER ONGOING fIII (BMP NS) DEPARTMENT ANDLOCALUIILIIY l.6,1154,$SL 2 REGULATIONS. BMP N11,N15q; lp ��. J ' \ / $ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE OWNERS TO ABIDE BY RESPECTIVE FIRE \ Q PROPOSED CATCH BASIN COMPUANCE(BMP N9) OWNER PROTECTIIONAGENCYREGUTADONSfORTHE ONGOING 1.e,1% MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAS. ROP.BIOSWALE / �DEXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLEUNIFORM FIRE CODE IMPLEMENTATION(BMP N10) OWNER COMPLY WITH CAUFORNIA FIRE CODE. ONGOING77 LC BMPPROPOSEDOD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 7-ELEVEN E I \ LIMB SHALL BE PICKED UP TRASH ENCLOSURE oy LNTER/DEBRIS CONTROL PROGRAM(BMP NII) OWNER AREAS SHALL BE SWEPTANO CLEANED, WEEKLY 6,60D$F. I \\ \T / /�T J `^'� DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW L i�a r DUMPSIERG SHALL BE EMPTIED. l PROP.BIORETENTION. \ / o fi NTH UNDERDRAINS:ii::i�i�. I.oT� E PER BIO-1 DETAIL:: ::::�: \\ / / I O <u n _ ENSU0.E TENANTS ARE FAMILIAR WITH ONSIIE LAT:34.094954'�: \ / DMA ID - BMPS AND ASSOCIATED MAINTENANCE 7 Jr .I DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA LABEL REQUIRED.OWNER WILL CHECK WITH CItt LONG:-117.593]88': 2BE ° AND COUNUAT LFASTONCE AYEARTO OBTAIN NEW/UPDATED EDUCATION 1120 11 I.N. 1\ \\ I <Nw o EMPLOYEE TRAINING IBMP N12) OWNER MATERIALSAND PROMDE THESE MATERIALS YEARLY 5 \ Fe TOTENANTS.EMPLOYEES SHALL BE MINED TOCLEANUPSPILLSANDPARTOPATE IN _ 9 RMP N4 L \ G`+ ONGOING MAINTENANCE.THE WQMP E%.R \ \ / J I LANDSCAPED AREA cu > E^ REQUIRES ANNUAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND \ \/ I o ofi TRAINING FOR NEW HIRES WITHIN 2 MONTHS. / 1/ 9 / la - LAT 34.594241' ; BMP N14,51 NI INSPECT,CLEAN AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE PRIOR TO RAINY SEASON AND AFTER EVERY LONG:-11].594241'0 CATCH BASIN INSPECTION BMP NI4) OWNER FACILITIES. PAIN EVENTGREATERTHAN 0.5INCHES. ) 1,5 :.. BMP53g \ I !9 ® o - �'/I �ry „2p a vv I r KEY NOTES Y VAIUUMSWEBRING OF PRIVATE STREETS AND PARKING LOTS ANO PRIVATESTREETSMUSTBE QUARTERLY(MINIMUM),WEEKLY DURING - - , / 4 MA- \ ' / O PROPOSED CURB CUT n _i PARKING LOTS BMP NUS) OWNER SWEPT. RAINY SEASON(OCT-MA`) _ BMP NBL J OP.R 54,55 ' M /,P S O2 PROPOSED UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN - PR \ \ - STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILINGAND MAINTAIN LEGIBILITY OF STENCILING AND - ) 3 PROPOSED OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE fi SIGNAGE(BMP ELI OWNER SIGNS. MIRY. \ / 1 5 \ 4 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN N TRASH AND WASTE STORAGE AREAS MUST BE \ / / 5 PROPOSED GRAVEL PAD f o INSPECTED TO ENSURE RECEPTACLES ARE NOT PROP.SORETENTION - '•�T 4 \ \ w O O 0 o COLLECTINGSTORMWATER.TRASH WITH UNDERDRAINS _ 3 BMP NI4,51� 6 PROPOSED FUEUNG AREA(DRAINAGE i0 BE DIRECTED - TRASHANDWASTESTORAGEAREA(BMPSB) OWNER WEEKLY - - -- \ \ I TO OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE BMP) ENCLOSURE AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT AND PER BIO-2 DETAIL \\ \ CLEANED,GUMPSTERS SHALL BE EMPTED.LIDS LAT:34.094748' E%.DRAINAGE V-GUTTER \ \J 1 MUST BE MAINTAINED CLOSED AT ALL TIMES. LONG:-11 J.593912' ` \ \1 / �I ] PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TANKS IRRIGATON SYSTEMS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ( \ ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONALItt.TIMERS / �B PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE ti$ EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS&LANDSCAPE MUSTBE INSPECTEDTO AVOID 9 PROPOSED OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR °rz DESIGN(BMD541 OWNER OVERWAIERING AND WATER C'YCLCAND WEEKLY DISCHARGE POINT 12 _ O 0 O DRD UIIATIONSHAURFADJUSIEOSEASONAUFf EY EXISTING 10 PROPOSED HEADWALL E P IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR. BUILDING CJ�o a m C+ TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE 11 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN m LANDSCAPE AREAS 14INCHES BELOW CURB, REMOVED WITHIN THE 12 INCH DEPRESSION E%.R \ - ,O SIDEWAU(OR PAVEMENT BMP EST AND REMOVEDDISPOSED WEQUIRTHEBIOSWALE AND of< ° m _ - i. VARIES 0 w o ITHIN V° --- 12 CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN im N w x OWNER WEEKLY \ / REQUIREMENTS. \ ' TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE V PRIES -J ,� o i BIOSWALES IBMP N4) OWNER DISPOSED OF PER LOCALJUNISDICTION WEEKLY W GQ REQUIREMENTS.INSPECT FOR SIGNS Of E%.CB (� e i n( EROSIONORDAMAGETOVEGETATION. - \ \\ N (D ° TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE --- Q °= REMOVED WITHIN THE _------------ BASIN AND DISPOSED INSPECT ON AND MAINTENANCE REQUIRED - BIORETENTION BASIN IBMP NT) OWNER OF PER LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT GREATER THAN 05 $ INCHES.INSPECTIONS SHALL OCCUR MONTHLY INSPECT FOR SIGNS OF EROSION OR DAMAGE 'a P TO ENSURE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. TOvEGETAnoN. _ BIO SWALE DETAIL Q o$ FUEL DISPENSING AREASWILL EMEND \ N.T.S. N LL 6.5 FEET(2.0 METERS)FROM THE — 03 CORNER OF EACH FUEL DISPENSER,OR �—_ —__— EX.78" sY THE LENGTH AT WHICH THE HOSE AND �lf Q _> NOZZLE ASSEMBLY MAY BE OPERATED PLUS I FOOT IDS M ETER),WHICHEVER I5 PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER E° 18'TO BICREIENTION BOTTOM $ LESS.THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA WILL BE PAVEDWITH PORTIANDCEMENT ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN Q - CONCRETE(OR EQUIVALENT SMOOTH ADJOINING SIZE STRUCTURES PER PLAN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE).THE FUEL W DISPENSING AREA WILL HAVE AN 2°2 APPROPRPERCENT)IATE SLOPE(2 PERCENT-4 _ 2-4°OF OVERFLOW P} 2-4"OF OVERFLOW °E Ef MULCH DRAIN `! MULCH DRAIN WILLBESEP RATEDPREVE FROM THEDI RAND - H SITE SERA GRADFROMTHEREST OF B`E THE SITE BVA GRADE BREAK THAT '9 m o? PREVENTSRUN-ONOFSTORMWATER.AN OVER HANGING ROOF STRUCTURE OR EILEILEe=ILRy� LI-I= =LE a U CANOPY WILL BE PROVIDED.THE COVER'S ENGINEERED II II-II II II II II II II II ENGINEERED I'III_II II II II-III • J ° SOIL MEDIA SOIL MEDIA -I_'-I_-I_it 'I-_ MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE AREA OF THE AS M 09, III II II ASTU C3 �IH AS TM C33 SAND C33 III to W FUEL DISPENSING AREA IN THE FIRST E 3 3 31 I a SAND, SAND, IIEy N o$ ITEMgBOVE.THECOVERWILLNOT 20-40Y, II III II II II III-III-II-II II 20-40R III-I Why DRAIN ONTO THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA COMPOST I 3113 COMPOST IIEII ° AND THE DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE ROUTED PER WIMP PER WQMP K 2 j Q E TO PREVENT DRAINAGE ACROSS THE REPORT) REPORT) K U h FUELING AREA.THE FUELING AREA WILL O a C1 2 DRAIN TO THE PROJECTS TREATMENT n jk W WEDU o a FUEUNG ARE0.5(S12) OWNER CONTROL BMP(5). ONGOING 6"PERFORATED 6"PERFORATED W d ED ¢W ED e WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM PVC PIPE WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM7 PVC PIPE W U E IN 30 MIL PVC IN 30 MIL PVC CG Uj NON-PERMEABLE UNER AASHTO q57 NON-PERMEABLE LINER AA /57 W a W R o GRAVEL GRAVEL J 4 a W a ° 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"TACK LAYER OF PEA NORTH W W 3 Z U 3.5 GRAVEL GRAVEL n Q-'Z U m 0 ?-g N.T.S. 3I0-2 Do GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET U N.T.S. N.T.S. 0 20 40 80 0 $➢ �� SHEET NUMBER W MI-,4 1 PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOU1H,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 -021-1 CHASE ORRIS EASIEVALL,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA ° ZO G: IN AL INDU T IAL O II \ \ / APN: 0209=041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS +MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 R879 AIRPORT DRIVE a ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 z (949)330-7562 TO OGRA0PHY 19 PROVIDED ON o AEON EON H \E 125- _ HI / EOH-F-\EOH NINTH STREET \ \ SITED T \ / I SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 --�-- - - - I / ° ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-ONO \(E) DIN LIZED \ - o4I \_______ INTERGE TION / r \ THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES: 2009 SAN BERNARDIN0&RIVERSIDE 1_-- ----�1125�������� 1 COUNTIES PAGE 602 GRID J-3 APN: 0289\054-79 ELA 0 / I ZONINGAAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1V1 ZONING: MEDIUM =t4 f1t/AC) --- _ II 4)) \ ^J� i I \ FEMA: HE MA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. -11 Z`J' r b9 •+1.08 •+24 •+1.1] 1.4 •+1.42 •+1.15 •+0. •-0.12 0. o FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA w l 1 f ___ / SUBJECT TO 1 PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOOD EVENT V \\`-- - LEGEND- L =Q< ig + '=f`3`S 1 \\ \ / ° PROPERTY UNE O k W^ +3 •+I. •+1. 1.35 •+1.66-,\1.18 •+.]5 •+0.15 •-.0 1 \ �+ "g \ CENTER LINE "o r\\\ 1 \ I 1 LIMITS OF DISNRBANCE I / \ •+1.6 \ I \\ \ / 1 77 PROPOSED FILL --------- + 1 63\3 p+1 _ - 53, al n2m9 1.74 +.4 •Y.B31 •+0. \ \ �.17 PROPOSE CUT °• 1 II••�•I II �� I \ \ �I I PN: 0209-054-8 E \ I \ \ I MEDIUM(8-14 U AC) 3 •+1i 6 11165 •+1 I .;II9 s3 a35_+.v _1.86 •+Lo I ESTIMATE EARTWORK QUANTITIES -- _--- CUT: 5,4 7 o z i I FILL: 5,457 CY 09 1•+I 2 l 70 •+2 02 2l •+316 3.03 +.93 +2.49\ •+1.4 \ \ / / 1 I •- ®�n _ J-¢EVEN SigEE � NET: 5,304 CY FlLL Y 1 lao•I \ 6.000 Sf \ ,I/ / 01 I n I �� NOTE: THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING 1 �' � I I \ \ / I GROUND TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT +.51 +1 8 2 O6 •T 9 •+3.54 •+3.43 .35 •+2.75 •,1 6 I ` \ / I o OR ON THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON \ la THE GRADING PLAN(S). ' \ I - � I \ I 5 THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ABOVE ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY THEY HAVE NOT BEEN FACTORED TO ACCOUNT- +.`Jb •+3.]9 •+3.69 +.60 f \ \ / / EXCAVATION OUANOCRE OVER- NCOMPACTIONGES IN LAND CONSTRUCTION UME DUE TO KMETHODS.NOR DO THEY ING, CLEARING AND RCCOUNT FOR THEGEHICKNE55 - o ------- 5�o.d '+2.]2 '+ 'I11 \ / / ^�� OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINGS, SLABS, REUSE OF PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW PAVEMENTS, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ES11MAlE5 FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. - PARCEL 1 I I \ / 1 4 / � o 5 .44 14.0•2 •+294 .3 •+4,05 •+199 •+2. +1 I I I _ k PARCEL MAP 8653 't + o s PMB 90/21-22 z n2a )v ij SITE AREA Y123122 \ Q 1 / ° TOTAL SITE AREA 1.87 ACRES O o wo J u •1. 2111M \ \ ,\ TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.77 ACRES 2 16 u m °a -______ 99 .+ . 291 (��i 3. +3J4 ��x EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES E m dye � \ 1 I n eN: 0209-054- EXISTING PERVIOUS 1.78 ACRES 7 •+2.98 •+2.87 •+2 57 -0.85,•-1.15 ` \ \\y/ I j ZONING: APEDIUM(8-14 D/AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES Q o _ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES - 1IZZ 1119 REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES 1ieU 4) / -1120 37 •+2.68 •+164 •+2.50 1.58 •+1.1 � ] \ U`\ / I I \ P + + 86 +2 1 •2.1 \`•t0.88 •+0.32 •+0.1 0 \ 1 \ W o. LJL ----------------------- _ PARCEL 1 n PARCEL MAP 1528 \ \ / 0 - PMB 14/561111111111111TTTT7_711111111111 APN: 0209-032-34 ° -ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ 1 / / o AP 0209-05 o \\ \ / / II ZONING: MEDIUM(8 4 DU%A�), $ ry o c DO w o� __ i- \ m z I Z rnm j Q zo _ -- �Q dU O \\ \\ j / I �W WU PARCEL 2 \ \ / / I Z of H z w 'T \ I PARCEL MAP 1528 \ 4 sue. _ W �1n U z `" --'-- PMB 14/56 � I\ `\ \\ / II I W¢W a o APN: 0209-032-37 I \ `1 I I I APN: 209-054-7 NORTH W W 3 Z 0 3= ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ 1\ / + M IUM(8-14 U/AC) r Z 1 I .nwrw n om 0 Do y$ -1115- 15 \\\ `\ I 10 0GRAP TIC SCALE O IN FEET 60 N \` mo SEI IYC IQ EiS,ft1N apMlwnµiy INCWAS M=E PAGE 602,GW J-d(2 00) rmE - 52E ---- IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA WE UTTIZATION MAP FOR TENT TO CE PARCEL MAP NO. 2 164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS F ///ie •• '% 600'RADIUS � lt, ' .. � e � IAx aun'�L / e � I• 14�- ur OALArOa OWNER �+ MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T.MANDEVILLE •,/ 500 LINDA VISTA AVENUE n PASADENA,CA 91105 ��xR wWnwv APPLICANT CHASE ORBIS EASTEVALE,LLC I.� SE//4.SfG Ia 7.IS,ftilF 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 I ((I I mms was LIME PA47 RV,GW J-J(2009) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 PH 949 330]562 1 MAP PREPARER ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIALU-21_ _ -01� s KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES LAND USE:GENERAL ZONING.GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONING:MEDIUM 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 INDUSTRIAL 0.50-0.60 FAR ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL LEGEND ORANGE,CA 92868 ( ) LAND USE GENERAL LAG USE:SCHOOLS(FAR 0.10-0 20) BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) INDUSTRIAL 0.50-0.60 FAR `, ��".._C. -' - '7 714 ]86-62]5 e' Q' Y I \ RIGHT-OF-WAY ( ) ". - PROPERTY LINE SITE ADDRESS R/W f.. UE CENTER LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,NCA 91730 SD- Exlsn"c STORM DRAIN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS E R �D- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 0209-032-35-0000 R/w R/+ ,I I• ZONING:MEDIUM ZONING/LAND USE LAND USE:MEDIUM FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL R ABBREVIATIONS LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL + fff ADJACENT LAND USE 3 == AC ACRES NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PROP. AR - ARM ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER SOUTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PROJECT SITE rc ZONING:MEDIUM EAST:MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) PARCEL 1 I t LAND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) CL CENTER LINE 'NEST:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1.68 AC Du Dwfiuwc uNMs UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BUILDING L E%. EXISTING SEWER:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAVALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6 600 S.F. GAS:SOUTHERN CAAUFGAS COMPANY PARCEL MAP 8653 I FAR FLOOR AREA RATIO ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CAUFORNIA EDISON R CABLE OCHARTER CABLE PMB 90 21-22 PARCEL MAP 8653 PMB 90/21-22 I - , - R HE AT&T PROPERTY LINE SCHOOL:CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT _ PROP. PROPOSED ZONING:GENERAL - - -�., I EASEMENT NOTES ¢� - R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 1. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE UNES AND PARCEL MAP 1528 PROP,BID ETENION BASIN A : - - INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT PMB 14/56 WITH UNDERDRAINS ZONING:MEDIUM - t SO STORM DRAIN RECORDED JANUARY 17,1885 IN BOOK 39 AND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC.., OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PROP.RISER 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL APN:0209-032-34 PROP, _!t• PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PROP.BIOREIENnON BASIN STORM DECEMDER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE WITH UGERDRAINS 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) PROP R DRAIN 3. EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 26.1977 AS BOOK 9164, PAGE 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. R 4. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL = _ MAP NO.8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04,1984 l QON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF PARCEL MAPS BUILDING EX.CATCH ZONING:MEDIUM PRGJEGT NOTES (TO BASIN LAND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) q THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN REMAIN - BERNARDINO k RIVERSIDE COUNTIES(PAGE 602 GRID 1-3). R R - EX.CATCH 2. FEMA FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE X AND EX.CATCH BASIN ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO, BASIN 0607 1CB630J. EX.CATCH R 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS BASIN TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS:2 APN:0209-032-26 - - TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:2.3292 ACRES ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONING:MEDIUM 4, TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS AND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP 1528 LAND USE MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (0.50-0.60 FAR) PMB 14/56 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.8653 AS PER y I lI E%.CATCH PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, APN:0209-%N f BASIN PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ZONING: GS7TRIAL E%.CATCH I E%.CATCH RECORDS. INDUSTRIAL INDU LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0-5 BASIN SITE UTILIZATION MAP _ PREPARATION DATE r 1-^---- R/W NORTH 12/10/2020 C4tAPHI 00 SCALE IN FEET . R/N O J�ADS:0209-032-36 E%,CATCH ZONING:GNERAL INDUSTRIAL 1 BASIN xHEN PRINTED AT Nu azE - - LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) (zC ar a6') ZONING:VERY LOW ZONING:C4JERAL INDUSTRIAL E%.CATCH LAND USE:VERY LOW SCALE: 1"=60' W.O. 1941210N LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(050-0.60 FAR) BASIN DATE: O6/2020 Klmley»>Horn SITE UTILIZATION MAP �"E" FAR 20-4.0 DU AC DESIGNED: %0 CHECKED: SA 765 THE CITY DRIVE.SUITE M.ORANGE.CA 92868 OF 1 SHEETS FE,cK REF: PHDNE: HORN D CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA °"°'N0' REVISIONS DALE BY FB. PHok,MLEY-XpiNO]M Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LMF Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts Part Number ® 6 CPY-FLAT-C SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ ® 28 CPY-FLAT-C-WH SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ % 1 XSPLG-4ME-2 2 @ 900 1.000 23600 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N 6 XSPLG-4ME-B SINGLE 1.000 17200 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N w/XA-SP2BLS ®> 6 XSPW WALL MOUNT 1.000 4270 31 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ Calculation Summary; 1.00 LLF Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min All Calc Points Fc 1.93 16.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. Canopy FC 21.20 24 14 1.51 1.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Paved Parking FC 4.24 16.5 1.0 4.24 16.50 . - -0-.1 0.1 0.1 0.T- 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN 0.0 0.Il .1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3. ° Q. 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.17' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2� 0.1 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POLES MOUNTED ON 3' BASE ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED: 0.1 0.1 .2 0. 2 0 .0 0.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (7) SSS-4-11-17-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ (1 Tx 4" x 0.125" STEEL SQUARE POLE, TENON MOUNT) LG-4ME-B MH:20 (6) PD-1 H4BZ SINGLE HORIZONTAL TENON 1 @90° o.1 0.1 D.2 0.4 1.1 2.8 5.8 7.9 7.4 .3 9 2.8 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 I o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (1) PD-2H4(90)BZ DOUBLE HORIZONTAL TENON 2@90° (6) XA-SP2BLS BACKLIGHT SHIELD w 0.1 0.1 .2 0. 1.1 2.7 6.4 5.9 .3 6.5 .2 3 3 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.•7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.4 2.2 3.5 4�7 8 4.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROPOSED POES MEET 120MPH SUSTAINED WIND LOADS ® 1 d - �15 9�WH '� H . . *** CUSTOMER TO VERIFY ORDERING INFORMATION AND 0.1 0.1 .2 0. 1.1 2.8 3.7 .1 3.5 3 4 5. 1 11.1 12.0 12.3 12.3 12.3 1 .3 12 �.Z 12.1 12.2 12.1 12.2 12.2 11.8 10.5 6.7 3.7 3.2 6.9 6.2 5.0 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �� M :,4. CATALOGUE NUMBER PRIOR TO PLACING ORDER *** 1P 18Q zoE!21 21 1A 2�1 21F 21 21192121 1 21 A2 21021 21 Ell T1 R 21 211 21T 21®21 21 1A zo 11F 1 O 0.1 0.1 .2 0. 1 1 O 2 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 11.7 5.4 4.1 5.7 3 0. C�.b 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 //3 16 222 23 23 24011024 24 23 2qq bJ23 23 3 23 23 2 23 23 23 223 23 23 23 20 1 V O O U�� ��� V OfjO XSPLG 4 9 1 16 20`P 2 23 23 24 24 23 23 23 23` 23 3-23 23 2 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 2323 23 23 23 2`2' 20 1 MH:20 0.1 0J1 .2 0. 1� 1. 2.1 2.7 .7J6. ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 9 ® 12.0 5.9 4.6 6L6 9.6 5.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15 1=0 21 21 21 2� 20 20 20 2=0 0 20 20 L(T20 20 20 20-0 20 20 20 2=0 20 20 20 1= 170.1 0.1 .2 1.9 2.6 2.7 .4 3.9 3.96. 10.2 13.2 13.0 12.0 11.5 11.3 1 L.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 2 11.0 10.1 7.4 6.2 6.4 9.7 8.1 9 •5.8 lo04. 7o'l 8 03 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 D.3 5.0 6.0 5.9 5.2 5.0 6.6 6.5 8.5 8.7 10.0 9.4 5.9 4.3 3.7 3.5 3j 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 .5 3.5 3.6 3.8 5.6 9.9 9.1 9.2 3.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 ' 9 ' 9 ' 9 ' 12 10 ' i.0.1 0.2 .5 4. 6.6 7.9 4.4 5.3 9.0 12.1 123 14.2 7 9 2.5 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 3 2.2 3.1 4.1 7 35 6.4 1.7F 0.4 0.1 0.1 o 0 O 0.1 0.2 .7 5. .3 5.1 6.0 11.0 11.6 14�.2 )6.5F12.3 6 8 4.0 .2 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1. 1. 1 2 1.2 .3=- 1 N�4 2. 3. 5 H 20 E-B1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 �j rJ� 0.0 0.0 0.0 XS G-4 B S V ' MH: 0 • Q r 0.1 0.2 .6 5.0 4.6 5.7 10.8 10.6 L -4 1�. N1 .8 6 5 3.8 .1 1.1 1.0 1.9 3.2 3. 3. 3 7 3.5 .5 2.1 O 7 2. 3. 7 4 4.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0 0 0.� 6.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 o r pp N N o � (.T1 0.1 0.2 0.3 5.6 6, ;4• 5.3 4.3 6. 8.2 10.0 9.7 -10.6 5.3 3.8 2.3 1.0 1.3 5. 5 1 1.6 2.0 3.8 5.2 5.4 5.2 - 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 r0-0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 10521 3.5 Q ..6, 4.8 3.8 8 8.0 _ 6.5 5.7 4.2 - CPY-FLAT-C 0.7 1.3 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MH:12 rn 0.1 0.2 0.3 3.7 6.2 5.7 5.5 3 V 1 9 ' 4 ' 3 0 4 88 ' 111 2 ' 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 \o.0 0. b.0 0.0 0.0 / o f o f 1 12 . �34 . 4 22 . 6 \ /,a//1 0.2 / 0.4 3.4 6.2 7 9 4.5 2.8 2.0 1 4 1.4 1.5 2.9 4.7 CY) �^ 1. 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 VJ � � m 0.1 0.2 0.6 4.5� 8.3 6.5 .54.8 2 2 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 2.7 4.2 MH W O O C) O m 2.0 1.3oO D 0 0.2 0 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 X ME-B �_ r^ 0) X < XSPW V) MH:11 0.2 /0.5 3.9 8 4 7.2 4.3 3.0 2.3- 1�4 1.0 0.7 0.9 2. .2 -n fl'1 m 3.2 1.503 0. of 0.1 0 0. 0.0 0.0 - 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 z o 0.1 0.2 0.3 3� 6 ( 7.4 5.4 3.3 .4 1. J 1.1 0.9 �0.9 2.1 3.S XSPW 3.4 1.50 0.2 0 0.1 0.0 0 l5 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.A 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 (D MH:11 - KD ().1-0.1 0.2 2 4-.-5-- 4.9 4-.-r- 1 9 1-.�1- 3: --6-. - 7-0- .tom 3-0- --F- v ` - -7-34 3-0- T 9 - 7 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0.0 o.0 0.p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8 F 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.2 3.9 4.6 3.9 3.7 3 y 3.7 2.2 1.1 1.6 2 95�3.1 2.7 3.0 2.9 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.8 3.2 2.9 2.8 .9 1 2.7 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BOM : Complete Part Description 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.4 3.1 6.9 6.1 5.5 61-2-11 .4 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.W 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4 F 1.2F .3 1.1 0.7 0.3 0as 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 �j 28 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.1 Sr9 8.2 7.6 6.7 5.6 2.3 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0. 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 O.O�L 0.0 Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------- 4 --------- C7 - VV H 06 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.8 6.0 5.2 SPLG4ME-B4 5.6 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 XSPLG D-HT-4ME-24L-57K-UL-BZ-N oos000 0 P e:• 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.2 W0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 07 SSS-4-1 1 -1 7-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ °° 06 PD-1 H4(90)BZ \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0. 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 -0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0. 6 �� .0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 PD-2H4(90)BZ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0H'01 .0 .0TEN 0 UA C� 0.0 0�0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 06 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ - --- A R B A LO*Do'oA °Ey - Mo 06 XA-SP2BLS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4 0 �H 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 >0 0.0 0�_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 trJ _ o.o o.o o. o.o 0 0-� -o.0 0-� 0 0-- o.o 0 o cr.o - o o-o- o o o o$ 0.o o o o- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 II - L - - - - Illumination results shown on this lighting design are based on project parameters provlabor d totoy Project Name : 7 EIeven # 1046125 Archibald + 9th Rancho Cucamonga, CA E y°UtBy. Scale 1 if20' CREELI HTI N Cree Lighting used inconjunction with luminaire _ _ _ __® test procedures conducted under laboratory conditions. Actual project conditions differing o I l i n W i t h e row from these design parameters may affect field results.The customer is responsible for ^ Q A COMPANY OF IDEAL INDUSTRIES, INC. verifying dimensional accuracy along with 0 40 R 0 compliance with any applicable electrical, SR-42253 Footcandles calculated at grade Filename: 71 1 -20061 1 RCCACW.AG Date:6/11/2020 9201 Washington Ave, Racine,WI 53406 https://creelighting.com-(800)236-6800 lighting,or compliance energy code. -+ EOH EOH EOH - - 9TH STREET - - m m I O — EXISTING h' X I W U) EXISTING POWER � POLE W (TYP) EXISTING R/W J_ I I � I of Q PROJECT SITE I Q w z W Z w Q 't----EXISTING OVERHEAD Lu m I UTILITY (TYP) > U O Q (n m z I of � I c/) x W NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 160 KimleyoHorn IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATWE PARCEL MAP NO® 20164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS APN:0209-021-17 APN:0209-021-16 I \ \ I ♦ NEwwI ZONING:INDUSTRIAL ZONING:INDUSTRIAL II I \ \ I \ APN:0209-041-01 eI4� ZONING:MEDIUM NINTH STREET I \\ v OWNER IC N89'SO00"W n R /`1� IN 500 UNDA META AVENU E.MANOEVILLE ——1125 PASADENA,CA 91105 APN:0209-054-79 -- " S8s'S0'00'E 2t9.47' //ZS \ \I j / ZONING:MEDIUM APPLICANT 1 1 _II?9\ \ / SEI I SfC Iq T.IS,ft7W CHASE ORRIS EASTEVALE,LLC Ex-R/Y/ 208 NEWPORAT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 544tl8'304E 27.95' / INOVAS&i0S ddx PACT 601, J-J(xtl9) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 1 T \ 1 PH.949-330-7562 p3- I I vv iv1 MAP PREPARER KINNEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 ORANGE,CA 92868 'III✓/ ` 1 \ / I BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 1122, I APN:0209-054-80 PARCEL 1 _ \` / b14)7a6-627s ZONING:MEDIUM I 1.68 AC - W i /�v 1 TOPOGRAPHY 1 ` `.� I / I ADKAN ENGINEERS 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE Ex. RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 PROPOSED / / Ex' NORMERLY TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON O8/23/2019 BU ING ,I / SOUTHERLY " I Q\ R/w R/W SITE ADDRESS VARIES 44.96'1 8678(29') (37') RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AVENUEBALD AMON ACA 917M V II v / 11 (I. 1D') (Iv') (25') _ (12') ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS PARCEL 1 020s-032-35-0000 PARCEL MAP 8653 n I \` m I S 1 \ o E%IST.AC 1 ZONING/LAND USE PMB 90/21-22 a \ ° '\ "� PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ——1120-— z 3 \ w1 /1\, EX.CURB &GCUIUIRRB SIDEWALK LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ &G ER P EX.R PARCEL MAPS65S - \\ \ / 1 \ ADJACENT LAND USE / 1 APN:0209-054-82 �\F� \'S NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL i PMB 90/21-22 \\-R/W \ \\ \P / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM 845E COURSE �COMpgC1ED SUB-GRADE SO UTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ \ \ WEST:GENERAEA T.MEDIUM L a-14 INDUSTRIALLc) ZONING:INDUSTRIAL \ / 1 NINTH STREET NOT TO SCALE UTILITY PURVEYORS li \ / /(,1 WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT �\ \ / /'I EN Ex. SEWER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ '' / WESTERLY EASTERLY GAS:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY yV���I R/W ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON -- PROP.It J / I R/W (VARIES 100'-104'2) TELEPHONE:AT&T o N89'49'29'W 236.18' - / (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96'J CABLE:CHARTER CABLE SCHOOL:CHARTER CUCAMONGACAB SCHOOL DISTRICT -_` (VARIES) (VARIES 4L5'-45.5'E) (32') (1296') EASEMENT NOTES PARCEL 2 1 3 U / / 1� (VARIES 1. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND n -------3 5 RECORDEDINCIDENTAL JANUARyES,N eas NOBOOKN 39 PARCELI -0.65 AC o 6.5'-]4 E%IST.AC 1 ryy' w Q � I I OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PARCELMAP 1528--- rn / PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL EM.SIDEW Ex.CURB SIDEWALK PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED E%.CURB PMB 14/56 0 \ / &CUTER &GUHR DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE \m 144E E OFFICIAL DERGROU APN:0209-032-34 �3 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND ZONING:INDUSTRIAL �/ / APN:0209-054-78 \BASE COURSE INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT EXISTING I COMPACTED SUB-GRADE RECORDED APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164, BUILDING I/ / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM ------ z (TO REMAIN) PAGE 144E of OFFICIAL D RECORDS. Ex.R z I\ / I ARCH NOT TO AVENUE EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL \ / NOi i0 SCALE MAP N0.8653 RECORDED OCTOBED 04,1984 1 I 4 1 1 I I \ 1 / ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF --- N89'S0'00'W 235.06'------' r \ \ / II PARCEL MAPS PARCEL 2 I 1 \ \\ / jll` PROJECT NOTES PARCEL MAP 1528 \\ \\ I 11 1. THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN - PMB 14/56 _ /!\ \ \4 / 1 BERNARDINO&RIVERSIDE COUNTED(PAGE _--- ---_--------------- 602 GRID J-3. APN:0209-032-37 \\ \\ I 2. FEN FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL N0. ZONING: INDUSTRIAL I \ \ / 06071C8630J. \ / III 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS TOTAL F PARCELS / III TOTAL SITEBER ACREAGE:232932ACRES 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS LEGAL DES CRIPTION APN:ZONING: MEDIUM PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 40.8653 AS PER ZONING:MEDIUM NORTH PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MAP PREPARATION DATE 0 20 40 80 5/5/2020 MAP REVISION DATE SCALE: 1"=40' O. 1941210DS DATE: 0fi 2020 DESIGNED: xo �mley»)Horn TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 20164 CHECKED: ESA OF I SHEETS 7fi3 TIE CITY DRIVE SUITE 200,ORANGE,CA 91Bfi0 Pw cK REF: HExe n4-w9-1wo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA no. REVISIONS DATE BY F.B. WAW.KIMIEY-HORN.COM DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Orbis Rancho Partners LLC ("Owner") owns an approximately 2.33 acre property located at 8768 Archibald Avenue immediately south of 9th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") ("Site"). While a majority of the Site is currently vacant, approximately 25% of the Site is improved with a commercial building and its associated parking. At this time, the Owner wishes to construct a "Lab Store" concept 7-Eleven convenience store of 4,595 square feet, a 2,005 square foot co- branded quick service restaurant, and 16 fueling stations ("Project"). The co- branded quick service restaurant will be occupied by Laredo Taco and situated in the same building as the 7- Eleven. Access to the Project will be provided on 9th Street via a full access driveway and on Archibald Avenue with right-in/right-out access only. The Project is part of a new concept that 7-Eleven deems the "Lab Store" and one of less than a handful of other Lab Stores where customers can try and buy the latest innovations in a revolutionary store format. The Lab Store concept evolved from the reality that customers demand more than just bread and milk from convenience retailing. The Lab Store will provide organic and healthy food options that differ from the traditional convenience store customer experience._The store will provide a new customer experience with patio and inside dining areas that offer made-to-order smoothies, agua frescas, street tacos on handmade tortillas, and baked-in-store cookies and croissants. Many of the new items in the Lab Store will be offered on a limited-time basis with new offerings on a routine basis. The innovative concept will be customer-focused by exploring new ideas that are currently not available in the current market. The Lab Store and restaurant will provide residents and visitors an additional option for shopping and dining in the south west area of the City were services are currently limited. In short, the Lab Store is a place for customers to taste and buy new food and beverage items. The 2,005 square foot quick service restaurant, Laredo Taco Company, is famous in South Texas for its handmade tortillas, barbacoa, carne guisada and fresh salsa bar. All of which, are prepared onsite and made to order. The Project will create approximately 21 new jobs, which are allocated between 15 jobs and 6 jobs for the Lab Store and the Laredo Taco, respectively. The Project proposes enhanced architectural detailing that is inspired by modern and mid- century modern architecture that mimics details of this style including a butterfly roof design on the gas canopy and angled roof design on the convenience store/restaurant building, use of concrete and natural materials, placement of windows, steel work, and covered patio canopy. The City recognizes in the General Plan, that the Southwest Focus Area is isolated from commercial and retail uses such as restaurants, grocery stores, etc. The Project, which is one block north of the SW focus area, provides for indoor and outdoor dining, access to healthy food options as well as convenience items, and fuel in an innovative experience and design setting, which will positively contribute to an area of the City that is currently lacking such amenities. The Project is located at the corner of Archibald Avenue and E 9th Street within a Exhibit C 0245-000--3940359. commercial/industrial land use area and will not impact residential uses. The Project is within a 10-15 walking distance of a large number of residential neighborhoods and businesses in the area. Given that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 "Infill" Categorical Exemption (among other exemptions), it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to the City's development code and land use regulations, the Project is consistent with the existing zoning and qualifies as a permitted use subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, because the existing commercial building will remain in place, the entitlements will include a parcel map to create two separate legal parcels for the Project and the existing commercial building and its associated parking, independently. In the current retail market, customers have come to expect the ability to purchase alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores and quick service restaurants. Accordingly, the Project will require both a Type 20- Off-Sale Beer& Wine license and a Type 41 - On-Sale Beer& Wine—Eating Places license for onsite consumption of beer and wine at Laredo Taco from the Alcoholic Beverage Control and a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination from the City. A letter of Justification to support the PCN has been submitted with the application. This Project supports the goals and policies of the General Plan (LU-3.7, Goal LU-6, LU-9.1, and LU-9.4) and the City Council Goal #4 to attract new businesses to increase ongoing net revenues for the City. 0245-000--3940359. c t{c -ti-i 1 �~ r i�,..�, t — J. ••.�,� .ref :. — . . _ :�•+ ti .ter. .- �< t - _>s - -BRAND GUIDELINES _ EST. 2017 �. r:'}' 'F �'n r i + r r �,�+�<! '` ! t. a N�*' .�.��j.'y �.•{',�`4Nr�. �`�r'c'�' •�l't�> � . Sa t,-, F• F YL �.�rl.��:� � ' 'fY-� .y. T;E 4•�+:'� Ar ~ �� � t`� Y� • � ! � '�✓-ti 1-4�r i. is 1 '`' ' - j4, 41A l ;'C K7' _ 1 U y � X "�(. `* i y t • 1 -� �fy ''I,",� y !�,z�' - �+��_M�yj}�ff1.".��•`i.i, e��il•}�+ '?� ti5 ;rr• -�`� �i G� ! •? ��7 + Y ry L�A.1.- i- ,�1�fK". %y� ���-,j�l r;tii I .+�d -._ .� � �� ...•�-.l1.fs� •3_r�r"'�7�•�_-..- :,i' -i;02'�'�+r��`�i§�`mow �� r _.. y C,_ - 4'r•.�'����"4�.:''b.?�'f�-.w.lr?. .:r. i i .dY. �l.Y 1 sS-� E r°� 7MWt o O O CD m ro No CA S O 0 W � a w o co m • �# � d I Y C7 1p x m i r 1 m W W N N CO A O fO O 1 i m ff O E C2 1 I O. W N R K r I= r-r j i - r I?4 t- F m m cr w w M R �• ry 0 �. w ❑ c w a ,� R g a o T ro o m c o •K o o c o m c v v 'R w O n T " v o 3 3 o w R t et m H o a, � o i 's •� M G n m N 3 a m x 2 O � N m � m o m = c m r a d { m m cQ v o 3 H o w o m. s 0. ID 0. S S 0. N rn eD C N cr eD Q. � S � d m cr ° ^ m N , m d 113 n $ a n H c a T m j cl a .._. 3 d C D- ` ym .< o = y m '� oo m o m m 5�. a, .� H m 3 a � v N m o� o E a+ o T m N - -c a i �r 1 lb .a " x . . � or - - 'bob A � f NOW rn � 1 4 o n P w a mfD 31 rorn _ cc m 3 m p o m o `° w ? N d ^ N, sr a 1 m o a w y o � 3 a p_ m �n o "� `4 T � 0 3 ro _a C3 1p � N Sp (� p m m o m p' 0 a S � C 0 cr Cm d {� c S O T T cm0. m p m d V' • • • N d N J` p Z a O n N m -C• a C d N m p 3 F T m CD ro S v n �n C o 3 o -� v 0 a m y n p 19 Co a j S � cn E c p rn °.-' .m 0n rn d a T a N d � T m T �_ p y N m w J o 3 cn 0 0 C f d m - m � N m 3 0 0 T D O d T CO CM o q < fir`m z o `6 O n N a � m a 0 m m °i c O (/Oi A o cn' O m n cn !TT z m 3 n c �• O _ T � p rri �• O � N �C `e [p v A. Nco O m d jp �p 1O % Y q M �_ C d G y y IE = w m LID a cm m i S K g `n m d w w o N. a mZL p o CL ; i ............ wti •yr�y�r` � .'� fit • P _ � K W4- 3 N o w S Li o m c m cr' c m 3 3 a s m A 2 s w 3. o sr m a Z Z w m � U b d w 3 m � ° T ti'c ° a, w r i -. 3 E vryry _. � T ry `S O poem in N m 2 m w a m w w w m Q m � ° °e m °c •[ o � E co c w o y n a T N T m O O SD o m W AOr` r 4'. r 1 1 R 0- _ e+t m ° ° p m n c' = m w °c < '" p 9 w a' x 1 p m m � x � E E A 'q .�° .< m m w w o a ~ 3 .^ s C o03 H w m w O- c c s m o E `AI °—' rrl C,S ET a m ° ? m F m E m 'K E �- •�"' Ci °, m a °, w .C.. m m ° m c v a m m m O lT N p J iy W 5 2 CAA c o _ m m .• 2. C n C n C n C o ; -i 2 a 0S C) m 0 o p p p a p m 9 rL pZ2 to f r ti a N v c o :E A °a n 0 m a m ] n o c x E¢ m o n n ;a m5 en �C T x °' z � rn m i G) m' 1 Jz O� 10 K d p ° 4 T N ern jcolli m n g m f N O S S O O 0 m o y /4 • • O • • °. ' q S. m In a o E y ' p liCS IE o p f�l I P'n w N a E ,m' E �' D ° y m • S N P c E — �° ° r s o m 3" m EL Q • 0 P C v or n O O m a i a90 -O rn cn S N C 40 AIL IMP tft tPW r, v c v rm Z m N O N _ T r O o ; 3 3� T" a n T m o. � C/) o0) u n¢r m y K Ov ,$ n_g, a , b a n �i u r Z w n m E ,R" m 'S w m m n T � � o c { a �c m ° S i x p r on C n b' n H G1 p m --R v �p a .` � g O ° K Q N — T S m m 0. m 0 -p nA n nw �^ m 0 0 m w.3 _ m do r m Q o O X a Z 2. A � 1}R wa T uO n rZjl Z!Ov . O m'S � �m n3 ° p � �y fOit 2 d A = a ,Fr c E, c - a T m a T IQ m N S ro ro S D_ ro ro ?g v p g m 3 n ? a m rP 2 p m n � S c O � i g a Z Q � a N Fr- O � m - La - 01 N N N �r CO) ,a � n� m j n „� •- ' m (n 0 m w M 3 x � N � A N � A a M C'n m 0 om u O 20,E 4! K a � a S F R_ C K N N v 451. 0 Ul Sn w 0 R1 n RL F O $7 a ° m °v moo` m p ➢.A� c �: ° m m e n ° O 0 0 o n a c F m 3 a � � � W a m rc E w m N ^y m m g y ry � p � � ep O d° am m R o 3 L. ° �� a H m 7 a T O z cm D o n e. q= o 1 =p v c n o _ b � � A N W N A yy { S G r oil S. RI ° m Qo- N i^ F 0 8=e � w� � e z m T 0. am -_g. aQ m s Z op �o ! oc a T ° m Ir cd O afo - �; ?_� s 0 _ w$ a o $ T m 3 A xZL 4 m ro 'm o O 1 0 N ° m F in a y R a' `L a e a- o o w o e ° m f N m T r n fn m ' � CO A m IT1 a T o _ o ° q � o N N - ° W N � FF N — w a T v °a 3 - o a 3 v e o m Z o N lTl ® [ o p Fl�l/) , !#!2W, » ( CAJ |�!/ \\� /! - ƒ� i, } J E 2 / � - « § f 2 } 2 ¥ � # G ■ !!§ 2 ! \( .0 k((ƒI \} I O /t | - �� £f E¥ \ ( ■ iffy({» or �}ƒ%24 ■ ; ;f\fƒ % f � , {\/7(■ - -} �E | � }}�\� � {\((// {B � - Fr ; ■ _ kkr ! § 2 § {\} ! }} \N )}!/!• JG :� � -�!� , � g /( e EE — - � » � � . p \ _ }\E m GOI crt m coo) k k � _ _ m § # m ° 3 — 2 ® ( / \ ( M \ \ ( ( I � ! g (\ § » %) q � \ \ . 0 } I§ ! . do /0o { ®/ § \�� • � \ \ � \ ca 0 ' o 0 3. n 3 a 0 r R1 o o a s w ? S C ° 3 r 6 -' 'p Z 0 0 a' T ° 3 a CID'm o' m D m m N s o a r $ O m O Cn 0-0 lGi 's n ° " C H a T N Z 3 S vw VI . m o m c a sr a 9 _ 1 N O = r O m 3 d ' /j n B A - FA a p L It m aA i A . Q ° P W N a 3 v a O y �•� A m m S .Z7 s m 0 'w =' w O O •i S N .O-. � F y. N R V T N- N R inp m m en' IS y o 3 3 o 3 Cr o m a N O O T H O W ? b O O p w 0. e m S O % 00 N _ N � S 1 f u W W w a f7 d'9 T iE �p m N N n S 1° z rw fA ■+ pr r.+ w � � $W b -a m m a � v m � `C N o m w � nm i.0 ply ! .p A�H yl z N �' rn' zE tn ►o r" 1 O Ln � 4 o O n a S m 0 r - c w ''-9I oo _�l GA -7 Oo �°-o o °'-, �IC � C v �I y v.pm a.°^' z c N N C = to C I:t 100 C! '_ 1 n O N j �_ J N J fA �I CI a O wl�I p0 �I`i a �w - n 3 o w a Y m .. J u N b c b H E ° R lE 'b'� 6. n fG O z L14 N �rl tANIZI to IN Z o a N n 04 w r >c 3 v a o 1 0 0 9 -'A =O A a b 6 — i�.y q� O O O Q I�T o x P $`" b n 0 Im .0 m ? a o v �. V W fj r, C7 ~ L W CI ° tpii 3 s d O � 0 � N ��`1, � � � I � m on 98 Jada o � a � H s ..Cr�' o Gs A.iv'I o W A 'a I' d NI"FryR� p � 10 A N rn v 1''iFl, 0 W C AM�� J IIA11 -i VA�� /��. VE �Le+ r+ `M`,•, ''-1 1rT*r W m Lam•+ y ^�n= z 1 S m 3 < c Z I i 3 p toLit I r 7 n n G to o m ? 2.3 m m iHr� J yII Ii jp � : ,l I iNl�3ii 11,,�� ACCENT i BODY COPY TYPE� SUBHEAD TYPE F J O T A N x nx wS pg °a ° s a n a¢ K 2�; d Aa « ;may w =z a T_ =z -d O m n n tl a ° T ell. im 00 i S._� d m a m -' n 3 n ° IM 'nm 12 F 3 5Co Q' irF F f n E uSS=S n 4 n N d a CD mom 0 3me j 0 1 C2 ti W a A n -0 C0 W CD CW9 W co wA Urµ m v b rG7 C9 70 C7 C C '� m m C7 vl s m m 002 rri T 92 � � = �y c #C) Co Inc co cc r vi o 3. Gb �. �_ CDL cm 7C 7C < 4D ado = !n x N C < X X N N w rn aa m a Es ro = c (n O 5, 3 tA JA A g.3 2L 1 Z 11 ro O 0 G1i O C1l a m W co � C o a a cv 1 Co m T + a J O�7 • O�7 `-� o F a 0 3 m t!,64 Q a9 m 614 en rn o z q C Z Z A p 9 i , rn rm .� rrj- P.�m'c•y � n��'N � 3 t C7 6 R CD 8 � � } A a rnom 0 0 LA ' r Coo w w sd '4.w m Y m ? g n ,� ,, 0 9 o 25, • o rri Iv co 'm m r CM 1 Y w rkn Orm G � Q o � _ dNam S p 3 6 3 w T o _ 1 � 3 m y rx Ica &� A Sao era rm IRE y w�A I rm o ,. w �. m fY! � � _ rm W C g I rn u .• �' E�'�,� red TR COO) No 'X3Z 'R°B T7 rn LL z' -sa cn lrn a 0 co Oil All �Z Oz T -a B ;s 1 A C F ME -n�C ° dv m O Q m m aim n 'a� 7 T w p a 9- w 2 2 p 409 To Y g F ��R Lj :j 3- 62 r. � � moo• - 6�T o T ,g N ° Z gv A v t� r y t � 1 COO � o f f 5 , y Z I mp ; Z C" Ch • + A t • r` 3 �' r O 2 a 0 C7 u =0 sk • �I• f!1 � a c fA ;13 c c H y s u C mz c7z ab .. n p o b o $ O Oo O � ° n e N V. a . } o; N-0m 5y ov a p r G a p a Q ♦. w� N;� _� 3 mom r� IF O PO _ a CD } 9 H 10 MP Ln .� :s � � a b .a r O r y V' .� ww '\) Met rre 2 rri rn _ f n' rm cn a � - 5 # :0 v a rn rn a �� Ta ti o0 ­4 W712 70 3 3m co 71 aw G w C;2 n gJF r. -4n'I © z Col.) 7rro�6 � r o s o 4 � C 7t} � �' ca :E � o Tcm 1 1"r7 n o r" n .� �C A C 3 rri Cool r— (A c rm C=, x. 0 al r o ,do!9 � ©.% . ° \ 0 \ ^� �\ t • - \ �, � © ` . . � i � � ~ . . \ � . - @r r1o'C ƒ m � ` \ 0 \ ( ( { �� / < C=x \ ^ 55, \ m If =Q , \ ) (\k � � 4 r } % « �� - ; } f. ff7S « _ \ ( . - R A !. - ` � ¥ \ ( K - _ - . � � \ - . }\ � (/Ll . K( \ 0 q / W m "1 O m a ° m leef 0 3 II S = N ? c y F 2 Y ,� - _ {�t y 0 n m Y S a A ° w w v t O T # z � � v m 1 A .I { � I❑' M L w 5 � LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION 7-Eleven Fuel Station and Convenience Store at 9th Street&Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7-Eleven is proposing to construct an automotive fuel station and convenience store ("Store") on vacant land located on the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7-Eleven will be applying for a Type 20 license to allow the sale of beer and wine at the convenience store. The sale of alcoholic beverages is being offered as a convenience to customers who do not want to travel to another location that sells alcoholic beverages (i.e., a liquor store or another convenience store). In the current retail market, customers have come to expect alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores. The sale of alcoholic beverages will comply with all applicable regulations for the concurrent sale of fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code Section 23790(d)). According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverages ("ABC"), this Store is located in an area of overconcentration (Census Tract 21.05: 3 licenses allowed; 8 active licenses). Due to the over-concentration of liquor licenses in the census tract, Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code requires City Council to approve a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity prior to issuance of the requested Type 20 License. The following information supports a determination that a Type 20 license at this Store will serve the public convenience. 1. 7-Eleven has policies and procedures to ensure the safe sale of alcoholic beverages. 7-Eleven takes the right to sell age-restricted alcoholic beverages very seriously and ensures that all alcoholic beverages are sold in a legal and responsible manner. As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store employees, the company has put in place one of the most comprehensive crime-deterrence programs in the convenience store industry. These policies and procedures ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages for off- site consumption at this location will not cause or contribute to crime in the area or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 7-Eleven's policies and procedures include the following: "Operation Alert" Training Program. All 7-Eleven employees and new franchisees participate in a multimedia training program on security procedures, proper store maintenance, violence avoidance, and recommended behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially violent encounter. Each trainee is supplies with comprehensive resource materials on crime deterrence and violence avoidance. The robbery rate at 7-Eleven stores has decreased by 65% since implementation of this program. Exhibit D Responsible Alcohol Sales Training. 7-Eleven trains all cashiers and managers to sell alcohol in compliance with California law, such as age verification and prevention of sales of alcoholic beverages that may be detrimental to the public welfare (i.e., the sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons). In addition, the training includes the rules associated with the concurrent sale of automotive fuel and alcoholic beverages. Time-Access Safes. 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no more than $50 ($30 at night) in the cash register. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than $30 is kept in the cash register after dark and that the store staffers cannot open the safe. All 7-Eleven stores use a Timed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal amount of money in the register yet still serve customers efficiently. One section of the time-accessed safe contains a locked drop-safe where large bills and checks are deposited by the clerk. Another section dispenses change (coins or bills) only at predetermined time intervals. Security Cameras. 7-Eleven maintains state-of-the art video camera system and alarms in its stores nationwide. This system includes a 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor mounted in clear view of the customers. The alarm system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. The cameras will allow 7-Eleven to confirm whether cashiers comply with all verification requirements for sale of alcoholic beverages. Lighting and "Fishbowl" Layout. The Store will install bright interior and exterior lighting, including adjacent public sidewalks and alley to create a safer environment. In addition, 7-Eleven will place the cash register in the front of the store and keep windows in front of the sales area free of signs and merchandise so police and others can see inside. This is called the "fishbowl" effect because store employees are on display for passersby, including police to see. The "fishbowl" effect will deter crime and minors from attempting to purchase alcoholic beverages at the Store. Quantity, Display, and Storage of Alcoholic Beverages. 7-Eleven will not sell "airline" or small-size bottles of single beers less than 20 ounces at this location. In addition, in accordance with the Business and Professions Code there will be no display of alcoholic beverages in an ice-tub or within five-feet of the front door or cash register and there will be no advertisements for alcoholic beverages on the motor fuel islands. 2. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the 7-Eleven fuel station will be a public convenience and will not have a detrimental effect on the immediate neighborhood. For more than 80 years, 7-Eleven has been American's neighborhood food store, bringing convenience into the lives of millions. Approving a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption is appropriate for a fuel station convenience store with the size and variety of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to be found, and is a service typically expected by the public at such fuel station convenience stores. 7-Eleven's training and safety protocols will ensure that alcoholic beverages are sold in accordance with law. By including the sale of alcoholic beverages at the Store, customers looking for an easy "one-stop" experience while they pump gas are accommodated. "One-stop" shopping results in increased efficiency for customers, and is consistent with the operational plan of convenience stores. Furthermore, by providing one-stop shopping, the Store will provide a convenience to the community that may result in fewer vehicle trips and less traffic congestion. Customers would be inconvenienced if they were forced to purchase gas and snacks at the fuel station convenience store, and alcoholic beverages at a liquor store or at another similar location that may not have the training and controls that 7-Eleven employs. Alcoholic beverages will not comprise a significant amount of shelf space within the Store, and will only amount to a small percentage of the total annual sales from the convenience store. The sale of beer and wine will only be ancillary to the sale of gas and other snacks and items typically contained in a fuel station store, but nevertheless, are still necessary and an expected convenience for the consumer. The evolution of fuel stations and convenience stores over the years is that it now commonplace for fuel station/convenience stores to possess a Type 20 or 21 license in California. Modern day customers have become accustomed to stopping at a fuel station/convenience store for their basic needs, including alcoholic beverages. The sale of alcoholic beverages will not affect the peace or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. On the contrary, 7-Eleven's policies and procedures will ensure that alcohol is sold in a legal and responsible manner while enhancing the convenience for customers so that they have an easy one-stop shopping experience. 3. Concurrent Sale of Fuel and Alcoholic Beverages The sale of alcohol will be in strict compliance with California law and all other applicable standards requested by ABC, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, and the City Council. As mentioned above, the State has specific rules that regulate the concurrent sale of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code § 23790.5(d)). These include the following: • No alcoholic beverages shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unless it is in a permanently affixed cooler. • No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. • No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. • No display or sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from an ice tub. • No alcoholic beverages advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self- illuminated advertising for alcoholic beverages shall be located on buildings or windows. • Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. who sell alcoholic beverages shall be at least 21 years of age to sell alcoholic beverages. Security Plan n PHYSICAL SECURITY A SECURITY SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED THAT WILL COMBINE PANIC BUTTON "SILENT" ALARM REMOTE AND A CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION MONITOR TO SECURE THE PREMISES. THE MAIN HUB OF THIS SYSTEM WILL BE LOCATED IN THE OFFICE WITHIN THE STORE. DATA WILL BE STORED FOR 30 DAYS. EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED TO PROVIDE DATA TO POLICE WHEN REQUESTED. SECURITY CAMERAS: EIGHT (8) STATE OF THE ART SECURITY CAMERAS WILL BE INSTALLED, FOUR EXTERIOR AND FOUR INTERIOR, TO MONITOR ACTIVITY AND TO AVOID ANY PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS. LOCATION OF THE CAMERAS ARE SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN. THE CAMERAS WILL BE OPERATING 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT 7-ELEVEN PROVIDES A SAFE AND UPSCALE ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR PATRONS. OUR MAIN POS REGISTER IS BEING REPOSITIONED SO THAT THE PERSON AT THE SALES COUNTER CAN SEE THE ACTIVITY AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE FUEL PAD AREA. Security Plan ELEVER i OPERATIONAL SECURITY CASH CONTROL - CONTRACTUALLY STORES ARE REQUIRED TO DO DEPOSIT DAILY RECEIPTS AT BANK SO THAT MINIMAL CASH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PREMISES AT ANY GIVEN TIME. LIMITED AMOUNT OF CASH ON THE PREMISES WILL IN A WELL SECURED AND TIMED SAFE. ALTERNATIVELY, ARMORED VEHICLE PICK IS DONE THREE TIMES A WEEK. POS - WE WILL USE ONLY ONE REGISTER AT NIGHT. DOLLAR BILLS HIGHER THAN 20'S AND LARGER ARE DEPOSITED RIGHT AWAY IN A TIME LOCK SAFE FRONT SIGN & LOITERING- WE WILL POST THE SIGN AT THE FRONT DOOR TO SAY ""STORE HAS LESS THAN $ 40 AFTER DARK" AND "TIME LOCK SAFE - CLERK CANNOT OPEN". "NO LOITERING" SIGN WILL ALSO BE POSTED. STORE MAY PLAY CLASSICAL MUSIC ON THE EXTERIOR TO DESIST LOTERING. SALE OF ALCOHOL - HOURS OF BEER AND WINE SALES (NO HARD LIQUOR, NO SINGLE CANS OF BEER SMALLER THAN 40 OZ. AND NO SINGLE MALTS) SHALL BE FROM 6 AM - 2 AM, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. ALL ALCOHOL VAULT DOORS WILL BE LOCKED AND SECURED AT 2 AM. EMPLOYEES ARE TRAINED TO ASK FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER WHO DO NOT LOOK OF AGE TO PURCHASE BEER AND WINE AND EMPLOYEES ARE ALSO TAUGHT TO FOLLOW PROTOCOLS OF (ABC). Security Plan E[EVEn OPERATIONAL SECURITY HOURS - OPERATION HOURS WILL BE 24 HOURS, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. LIGHTING - STORE WILL BE WELL LIT, INSIDE AND OUTSIDE, CLEAN AND ORGANIZED TO CREATE A ""FISHBOWL" EFFECT, A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO OUR PATRONS. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LIGHTING TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE PREMISES, INCLUDING ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDE WALKS AND ALLEY TO CREATE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT. LITTER CONTROL - REMOVAL OF LITTER WILL BE ON A DAILY BASIS INCLUDING ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ALLEY UNDER THE LICENSEE'S CONTROL. GRAFFITI - REMOVAL OF ALL GRAFFITI TO THE STOREFRONTSHALL BE DONE WITH 24 - 48 HOURS OF NOTICE OR KNOWLEDGE. FRANCHISEE WILL WORK WITH POLICE TO UNDERSTAND ANY GANG ACTIVITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. For more than 80 Years, 7-Eleven has been American's THE "FISHBOWL" neighborhood food store, bringing convenience into the lives of millions.As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store Research indicates that robbers do not like stores that CRIME employees, the company has put in place one of the are brightly lit,with store staffers and cash registers EV DETERRENCE most comprehensive crime-deterrence programs in clearly visible from the street.That is why 7-Eleven ELEVM the convenience store industry. puts the cash register in the front of the stores and PROGRAM7-Eleven developed and implemented its robbery and keeps windows in front of the sales area free of signs violence deterrence program in 1975-76, based on and merchandise so police and others can see inside. research interviews with convicted robbers.The It's called the"fishbowl"effect because store program has been continually updated with ongoing employees are on display for passersby, including 7-Eleven stores'program research.7-Eleven's crime-deterrence program is police,to see.As part of a nationwide remodeling program,the company installed bright interior and shoppingto provide a safe based on four primary components of visibility into exterior lighting. and working environment and out of the stores, lighting, effective cash control, and store-personnel training.Additionally, 7-Eleven has installed video surveillance systems in its stores. TIMED-ACCESS SAFES "OPERATION ALERT"TRAINING Research also shows that keeping less than$50 in the • - Than 30 Years of cash register deters 80 percent of potential robbers. 7-Eleven corporate-store employees and new Most robbers say the"risk"is greater than the"take" franchisees participate in a multimedia training for that small amount of money. Store-Personnel Train • Program program and are supplied with comprehensive 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no resource materials on crime deterrence and violence more than$50($30 at night)in the cash-register. avoidance. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than$30 is Timed-Access • • The program,called"Operation Alert",includes kept in the cash register after dark and that the store information on security procedures,proper store staffers cannot open the safe.All 7-Eleven stores use maintenance,violence avoidance and recommended a-imed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal LightingBright Inside • Outsidebehaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially amount of money in the register yet still serve violent encounter. customers efficiently. The training emphasizes the high value the company One section of the timed-access safe contains a Closed-Circuit - - . places on the safety of all 7-Eleven store personnel locked drop-safe where large bills and checks are and customers,and 7-Eleven's no-resistance deposited by the clerk.Another section dispenses Surveillance Cameras philosophy toward robbery.At 7-Eleven,the safety of change(coins or bills)only at predetermined time store personnel and customers is more important than intervals. protecting the company's money or property during a robbery. STATE-OF-THE-ART removing signs from store windows.The result was a -7-Eleven completed a nationwide installation VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEMS 30 percent decrease in robberies in the test stores. of closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its _ _ stores.The company updated its robbery :9 r'w-A six-month follow-up study in Houston deterrence/violence avoidance training program for 7-Eleven has spent millions of dollars to install and indicated the same 30 percent decrease in robberies. store personnel. maintain state-of-the-art video camera systems and The message was that robbers steal for cash,and if alarms in its stores nationwide.This system includes a stores reduce their cash availability and publicize it, 2003-7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio they can deter robberies.The robbery deterrence teenage robbers to see if the younger robbers looked capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor program-including training for store personnel, cash at things differently than the adult robbers.The study mounted in clear view of the customers.The alarm management,additional field staff security managers, found that they look at the target and security system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. posters, signs and decals-was adopted measures in essentially the same way,with escape companywide. route and money being the most important factors. FACTS -A study for 7-Eleven by Athena Research 2004-The Operation Alert training program was The robbery 7-Elevenhas decreased Corporation (Athena)found that security cameras and updated including computer-based training for all by 65 •_ deterrence alarms did not reduce the robbery rate in the stores. program was • . _ _• in 1976. experimental stores.7-Eleven began installation of timed-access cash controller safes in its stores. 2005-7-Eleven began installing new safes with 7-Eleven is recognized high-speed bill acceptors and additional security and industryand - - agencies as 7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of accountability features. majorthe first - - formal crime armed robbers in prison.The results indicated deterrence program - •- robbers still looked for the same things in stores 2007-"Operation Alert"training, including visibility, Operation Program targeted for robbery-cash availability and visibility lighting and cash control, has been reemphasized in into and out of the stores. all of its stores. been certified/approved in several states. 1991 -One part of a three-part study by the National Associations of Convenience Stores showed robbery HISTORY OF 7-ELEVEN'S decreased in the first year after installation of ROBBERY DETERRENCE PROGRAM high-resolution, closed-circuit television systems and alarms. 1975-The Western Behavioral Sciences Institute, in 1993-7-Eleven began natonwide installation of conjunction with 7-Eleven stores, conducted a closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its robbery deterrence study with a grant from the U.S. stores as part of its nationwide remodeling program. Department of Justice. In the test stores, robbery deterrence measures recommended by robbers were -Athena conducted new research of armed implemented in order to determine their impact on robbers in prison to update its 1985 study,which crime.These steps included training employees in indicated robbers still looked for the same factors. robbery deterrence, reducing available cash and -� 57fis1t.�,� • r r �. 7i„�.f} x F � 4 �i_ � �. ,,,,, Arco Gas Stationi ►. �S • t w �m I _ ail PO _ yF- ,f F Othlll B1v i Chevron Gas StationCarl's Liquor -- - tt * 'r ft/i'iq • Cam' C ��C'� - Cad::r-aroy���'b f•,+"._ r .. a�psh m— y a Str• I•i � rT �- �'�j, .r r �' �, r �v� n;; • Il�r: I�� _. �i. s• �m�l;Ii ; �' r _ y � C-ies�ca=Ct. ' _���• �+a1'.a1ti,9. �i `� 1? _ �' ." :;y � ram• -+ ��ii r,� F ���Y. '�s •� Y� �_ ry.,i:r. '�, �• m It .o ,•: w■ Illp. r, �,.��x..•" ,y �, 1i(1 a � ^•, � �� •� � "� a q .. m �'4' ¢ � �� t s. �.. � Norfolk r.`m 4�, � n•Lezf l)r f V44 .w1 I µ o.,� v _ oo Sl, ' l ti r =~ 1• M ! w. s: 'i � - _ � u �•i•rd � , ', �� �f 1ortdav'� ��w ;a�,� � i�l��dr�J I, - O� .p,. � � s' 'r - • � .a._ �.w ��N• ;� 1.e�.�'';.. ,s r`}' •rs } i9.AiitlMi•s��gpi �F��NF }.� �,�,,�'1 � ^aa 1.•�3f „� •�++ - �#6 • �� ' HI rNi: a, ,kY.v� R' iw -° 'I' �1. � ��.aw-ky',It_•le��Py =k: o'end u Station(approved o ' F .r 11,>i�1111 Rya �ewood ay;ice . ,t• D �. be �. A ='•- i Plaee IHII���''Ia,. t'F4 i+�'\ f" � F,� „� I � , r : • '. � � � i a'i,i►'�i i F '`�� ��� . -,••s ��f� ! � ,+ �� T m . � F � i vim'• m � � ,' �, s� ' F nlrt � Wx--��. ^l�a;�1� -`• �:\ +y,k1;�/fir� ..d�`��rFr- �' �.. �iS�' '!. ���,,,f. •i x y a= � � �tii�l •1 l4o,Ty+ti. �K. '� k�� � ,a ;•:��-+r�r•.r �.'- r{ � ~r m� `' � - m�' -.a� sp� •:7l twat ;�, �' E � m .rJr? o''�ti'�'a+ •f��`� F - 'i���'e � ee �rr �r�iw .'� r• �s-yP' Easy Shop Market • 1 it,l, a a �i - - — Arr• o le- JL �� 8usinessm�en�e•l7� :.,r_ �p — `` w AL Station76 Gas "� �S '��. � P��� � � I - • ��x ?��'� �'� S � T('�d •�L'I 4neyrSt a ' } r • �� U ■ x P e 6rest Pr_ �` -. _ "" All �w r 41 ,I� 4 I I I ' I '�i � 1. 1 1 1 • • ' r ----m F �t • I I I 7L �L..r5 , r -- �' z a L, j!' Up • 111 •1 I I � -- r� _ � y�� � ntca a�5t'+ �5, �''��. ,' I FR• ; 9 •I r. is �i 2G2 ao9�w go � W SF i ,F.ji .y'f.���p -k iwAi i�-•I �• 1 �..ry �E'dely,,e DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Sean McPherson, AICP January 19, 2021 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS/7-ELEVEN -- A request for site plan and architectural review of a new commercial building and service station located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Site Characteristics: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91 Street. The north half of the site is largely vacant while the south half is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and associated improvements such as a parking lot—this building is not directly related to the proposed project and will remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9t' Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9t" Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (G1) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential (R) District Prolect Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The north elevation faces 91" Street, with the proposed outdoor patio connecting to the sidewalk via pedestrian walkways. The east elevation fronts on Archibald Avenue. A large landscaped setback with multiple pedestrian paths connects the sidewalk along Archibald Avenue to the proposed building and outdoor patio. The site plan illustrates an interior dining area for Laredo Taco, a convenience store area, food preparation areas, bathrooms, and employee backrooms and storage areas. Primary entrances to the building are proposed at the north elevation and west elevations. Exhibit F DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORB1S17-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 2 Vehicular access is provided to the site via an access driveway along 911 Street to the west of the proposed building, and another access driveway along Archibald Avenue to the south of the proposed building. Staff notes that an existing vehicular driveway currently provides access to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building. This driveway is proposed to be closed off with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. Access to this existing building and parking lot is proposed via a new shared access driveway leading to the south from the proposed 7-Eleven development. Architecture: The proposed commerciallrestaurant building exhibits a modern vernacular design theme and provides a variety of colors and materials. Notably, each building elevation incorporates a tri-colored metal band, which, according to the applicant, may or may not be illuminated. The east, west and south elevations include a prominent angled wall feature composed of fiberwood siding (Nichiha-brand "Vintagewood Cedar'), though staff notes that this feature is most prominent on the west facade of the building facing interior to the site. The north elevation is dominated by corrugated metal siding (Centria-brand "154 Dark Bronze"), a feature which is also prominently featured on the east and west elevations. Additional fiber cement panels (Nichiha-brand "Empireblock — Gray") along each elevation, and stucco finish along the north, south and east elevations compliment the design. Each elevation also incorporates anodized aluminum storefront glass throughout. The project proposes a varied color pallet, including lighter tones such as "Silverpointe" (SW 7653) and "Reflective White" (SW 7757), and darker colors used for features such as the covered outdoor patio ("Tricorn Black," SW 6256). Staff notes that the applicant proposes a flat-roofed canopy to cover the 14 fueling stations. This canopy incorporates the same tri-colored metal band as the building, which is reflected across each elevation. This is not proposed to be illuminated. The color pallet of the fueling canopy mimics the color pallet of the proposed building. At 17 feet in height, the flat-roofed canopy is intended to be subordinate to the convenience/restaurant building. This is reflected in its lower profile (17 feet in height as opposed to 20 feet in height for the convenience/restaurant building). The proposed project exceeds all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? (approx.) Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(1-foot increment from the feet(fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% (inclusive of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet Front Building Setback Min. 25 feet (covered YES (9'" Street) patio); 86.4 feet (proposed DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 3 building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy)_ Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Street Side Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (911 Average Depth of 25 feet (91 Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (gth Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(911 St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet(canopy) 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet canopy) Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landsca in : Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050- 1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Convenience Store 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9` Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Tentative Parcel Map: As noted, the project also proposes a Tentative Parcel Map to split the existing parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 4 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along Y' Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0,65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Staff notes that the existing commercial industrial building currently provides 29 parking stalls. Due to the reconfiguration of access driveways relative to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building, Parcel 2 will lose approximately 3 parking stalls. In order that this existing building maintain its current number of parking stalls, a shared parking agreement shall be required pursuant to conditions of approval for the project. Staff Comments None Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Discuss whether the tri-colored metal band should be illuminated or not. Seconda Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee forward the item to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Staff Planner: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Plan Set RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164,A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.33 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ADDRESSED 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of SUBTPM20164, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied the portion of Conditional Use permit DRC2020-00087 involving off- sale beer and wine sales (Type 20)and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license. At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to the balance of the development application and return at a later date for consideration. 4. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 5. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres,will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 is for the subdivision of the 2.33-acre project site into two parcels of land. The service station and convenience store will be located on Parcel 1 (1.86 acres) and the exiting multi-tenant commercial building will remain on Parcel 2 (.65 acres). The existing vehicular entrance serving the multi-tenant commercial building will be demolished, and a new entrance to Parcel 2 will be provided from a shared driveway with Parcel 1; and g. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 for review of the site plan and design of a service station and convenience store and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00138 for the operation of a service station and convenience store. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan permits a variety of land uses within industrial districts, such as service stations and convenience stores. The Development Code permits both service stations and convenience stores within the General Industrial (GI) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two parcel tentative parcel map and the proposed service station with convenience store comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Development Code. Each parcel complies with the 0.50-acre minimum lot size and minimum required lot dimensions outlined in Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code.Additionally,the proposed service station and convenience store complies with all of the related development standards including buiding setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking and design; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed service station and convenience store as it is located at the intersection of two public streets and provides two points of vehicle access; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Environmental studies related to traffic, noise, air quality/greenhouse gasses and biological resources were submitted as part of the review of the project which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems.The subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues,as the proposed tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels in order to create a separate parcel for the service station and convenience store apart from the existing multi- tenant commercial. The review of the project included the evaluation of environmental studies which concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment. f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision.The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332- In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1)the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2)the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are General Industrial (GI) District, which permits the development and operation of service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres,and is surrounded by existing industrial and residential development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332)exemption were found to not to be significantly impacted based on the following technical studies:an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). These technical studies determined that any impacts associated with the project will be less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12t" DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I,Anne McIntosh,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138,A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12,2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre(101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres,will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1).The proposed service station will operate 24 hours- a day, 7 days per week. Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 9th Street. The existing driveway which serves the existing multi-tenant industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolution 21- 19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant located within PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M.to 10:OOP.M.and proposes on-sale beer and wine sales(Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087;and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs."Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development,"which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high-quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses."The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District which permits service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with all other Development Code requirements of the General Industrial (GI) District as provided in the table below: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard (approx.) Maximum 35 feet(at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(I-footincrement from the feet(fueling setback line) cano 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback(9th Min. 25 feet feet(proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy) Street Side Min. 45 Feet(Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd—Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) buildin 31.9 feet(9th Average Depth of 25 feet (9th Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet(9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet cano 120 feet Rear Yard Min. 0 feet (proposed yES Setback building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 5 Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public, health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales(Type 20 alcohol license).The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has furtheramended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods.Therefore,the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4.The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332— In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption.These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, April 2021); Noise Assessment(Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption,and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 6 I,Anne McIntosh,AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: RESOLUTION NO. 21-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA,APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087 — A REQUEST TO OPERATE A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project,the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity(DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12,2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre(101,495 square foot)project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidelwalk and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres,will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land se, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the consutrction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 squre foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1).The proposed service station will operate 24 hours- per-day, 7 days per week.Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 9th Street. The existring driveway which serves the existing multi-tennt industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit(Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolutioin 21- 19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant located within PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 3 the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M.to 10:OOP.M.and proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087;and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code,general plan,and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, it meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods,"while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales,the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development,"which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which"encourage(s)high-quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available,and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property,or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales(Type 20 alcohol license).The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 4 one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment forthe application,the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Categorical Exemption, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads,April 2021); Noise Assessment(Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting,July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga,at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Conditions of Approval RANCHO CUCAMONGA Community Development Department Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A shared parking and access agreement between both resultant parcels relative to the tentative parcel map shall be recorded prior to final occupancy. 2. Signage and lighting shall be treated sensitively so as not to create a nuisance to residential properties across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all signage shall be either externally illuminated or provide "halo lit" illumination. Internally illuminated signage shall not be permitted. Further, lighting along pathways within landscaped setbacks along 9th Street and Archibald Avenue shall be treated with pedestrian level lighting, which may include low-level bollards with downlighting. The tri-colored band surrounding the building shall not be illuminated. 3. The applicant shall design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ("LEED") silver standards and cause the building to be certified as such by the U.S. Green Building Council. 4. Off-sale alcohol sales are prohibited pursuant to the Planning Commission's Resolution of Denial of off-sale alcohol sales dated March 10, 2021 and the applicant has withdrawn related requests for a determination of findings for Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. Electric vehicle charging stations shall be maintained in good working order and remain available to the public for use at all times. 6. In the event that the service station includes sale of diesel gasoline, diesel shall be replaced with biodiesel fuel in perpetuity. 7. All cigarette and tobacco products shall be only accessible by the cashier/clerk and not displayed near the store entrance. Further, no windows facing Archibald Avenue or within view of the elementary school across Archibald Avenue shall advertise tobacco or tobacco products, nor shall any window advertisements for alcohol sales relative to the restaurant be visible from Archibald Avenue or the elementary school. 8. Add your condition here! Standard Conditions of Approval www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 11. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 14. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 2 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 16. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing ramp located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 2. The project shall share a common driveway on Archibald Avenue between parcels 1 and 2 of tentative parcel map 20164. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 3 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require 1-4" UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the south side of 9th Street along the project boundary. An additional 14" fiber optic conduit will be required on Archibald Ave along the project boundary where both of the end runs will require a 3'x4'x3' pullbox on each end. This infrastructure will eventually be interconnect to the City's existing fiber optic backbone conduit on the NWC of Archibald and 9th. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 1-2" UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit and/or vaults shall run into the building's telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 4. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 5. At the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue, this leg of the intersection shall be reconstructed with a 35-foot curb return radius. The ADA ramp at this leg of the intersection shall be constructed per current ADA regulations. City Drawing/Plan No. 1094 shows the traffic signal poles constructed behind a future 35-foot radius curb return. In the event a traffic signal pole was constructed in a location that conflicts with the reconstructed curb return (or if the pedestrian buttons do not meet current ADA regulations, or other unforeseen issues), the applicant shall prepare a traffic signal modification plan for review and approval by the City. The traffic signal modification shall be constructed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building certificate of occupancy. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 4 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Grading Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project shall be annexed into LMD3B, SLD 1 and SLD 6. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 5 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Archibald Avenue Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia Common Name: California Sycamore Min. Grow Space: 40' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 40-feet Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Street Name: 9th Street Botanical Name: Quercus ilex Common Name: Holly Oak Min. Grow Space: 50' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 50' Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 6 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 16. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 17. Construct improvements as outlined in the traffic impact analysis and as follows, 1. At the intersection of 9th St and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the eastbound approach of 9th St from one left turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the eastbound approach of 9th St and construct all traffic signal equipment as needed. 1. At the intersection of Arrow Rte and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the northbound approach of Archibald Ave to include an additional exclusive right turn lane, and implement a right turn overlap including all traffic signal equipment as needed. A separate project had been conditioned to construct the following improvements, should these improvements be completed prior to the above improvements, a fair share contribution to the improvements constructed shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Improvements conditioned by separate project. A. Re-stripe the eastbound and westbound Arrow Route approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane and one shared through/right turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the westbound Arrow Route approach. C. Modify existing eastbound and westbound protected left turn operation to protected/permissive left turn operation, including all traffic signal equipment as needed. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 7 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 4. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan is required to be submitted to the San Bernardino County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Submittal can be made electronically through the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) at https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ 5. A Hazardous Materials Management Plan and a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement are required to be submitted to the Fire District. See Sections 5001.5.1 and 5001.5.2 of the California Fire Code. 6. One or more of the operations in use or proposed for this building/business requires a Fire Code Operating Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 8. Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 9. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. A suppression system is required to protect, the exhaust duct, the hood, and the grease producing appliances. 11. Commercial cooking suppression systems are required to be electrically supervised (monitored) in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 12. Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 8 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a site specific soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CFC NFPA 13 and the Current RCFPD Ordinance Standard 9-5. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations. Where EV charging stations are provided they must be ADA accessible in accordance to the current edition of the California Building Code. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The Water Quality Management Plan shall show a oil-water separator as a BMP between the fueling islands and the bio-retention system BMP. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 9 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Archibald Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 10 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 19. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 20. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer, or his designee, for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 25. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. 26. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 11 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 28. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. If required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 29. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 32. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 33. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City Engineer, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 12 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 13 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 39. The preliminary water quality management plan shows a "Bio" detail as 6" perforated PVC outlet drain, this is commonly referred to a bio-retention system with an underdrain. Show the outlet from this system to a storm drain. If the system only uses the outlet riser to outlet the water from the "Bio" system, then this system is a bog which may cause a vector nuisance issue and prior to the approval of the WQMP the applicant coordinate a review by the West Valley Vector and Mosquito Control District for their input on the proposed BMP. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Surveillance cameras (number to be determined prior to final occupancy in coordination with Police Department) shall be installed a combination of interior and exterior to the business, with the intent to capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security cameras. 2. Video recordings of surveillance cameras shall be nothing less than NTSC (National Television System Committee, the NTSC is the analog video color format used to broadcast television signals) standards, with a minimum of 1080p resolution. A minimum of 90 days surveillance video shall be kept and relinquished upon request by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, The Sheriff's Department, or a designated agent. The applicant(s) or on-site manager(s) shall maintain the recording system and cameras in working condition. 3. The applicant or on-site manager(s), shall post a prominent, permanent sign stating, "NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES" in place that is clearly visible to patrons of the premises. The sign shall fit the requirements as set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 14 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The business shall have an alarm system active and monitored by an alarm company who is able to contact law enforcement if a problem occurs within the business. 5. Applicant or on-site manager, shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licenses premises. 6. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. The exterior lighting shall be maintained in working condition by the applicant or on-site property manager. www.CityofRC.us Printed:5/6/2021 Page 15 of 15