Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/06/02 - Regular Meeting Agenda PacketMayor L. Dennis Michael Mayor Pro Tem Lynne B. Kennedy Members of the City Council: Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGULAR MEETING AGENDA June 2, 2021 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730  FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY – PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3). In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings. Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In place of in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in one of the following ways: Live Streaming on the City's website at  https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas or Local Cable: RCTV3 Programming Members of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting by dialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is being heard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the order received. The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading the COVID­19 virus. If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior to the meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements. CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.   TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM  ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                         Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                         Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo  A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­ D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY) D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY) D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 1 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior to the meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements. CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.   TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM  ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                         Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                         Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo  A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­ D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY) D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY) D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 2 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior tothe meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNELUSA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGSLLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’SINC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED ASPARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE, TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY) E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­ D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY) D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY) D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 3 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior tothe meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNELUSA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGSLLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’SINC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED ASPARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLYTERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE,TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL:Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­ D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY) D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY) D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 4 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior tothe meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNELUSA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGSLLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’SINC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED ASPARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLYTERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE,TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers atCity Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council onany item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing SuccessorAgency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previouslyincluded on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to theFire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is aprofessional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audienceand speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the businessportion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the businessportion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception ofpublic hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other publiccommunications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion ofthe agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon atone time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the CityCouncil also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority.Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars.D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­ D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021. D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY) D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY) D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 5 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior tothe meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNELUSA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGSLLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’SINC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED ASPARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLYTERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE,TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers atCity Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council onany item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing SuccessorAgency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previouslyincluded on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to theFire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is aprofessional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audienceand speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the businessportion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the businessportion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception ofpublic hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other publiccommunications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion ofthe agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon atone time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the CityCouncil also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority.Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars.D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month ofApril in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHzRadio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for$147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years.(FIRE)D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, ImprovementSecurities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No.SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approvea New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit,Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street BetweenHermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No.DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofBonds. (CITY)D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY)D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY)D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309,Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the SchoolCrosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­ 008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)   G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­ 03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY) G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 6 MayorL. Dennis MichaelMayor Pro TemLynne B. KennedyMembers of the CityCouncil:Ryan A. HutchisonKristine D. ScottSam Spagnolo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGAREGULAR MEETING AGENDAJune 2, 202110500 Civic Center DriveRancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCILHOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY­ SUCCESSOR AGENCY –PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITYCLOSED SESSION TRI–COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M.REGULAR MEETINGS        COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M.The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the CouncilChambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive.  It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unlessextended by the concurrence of the City Council.  Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can befound at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909­774­2023.Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV­3).In response to the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Healthrequirements, and to ensure the health and safety of our residents by limiting contact that could spread theCOVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings.Members of the City Council/Fire District and staff may participate in this meeting via a teleconference. In placeof in¬person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes in oneof the following ways:Live Streaming on the City's website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your­government/city­council­agendas orLocal Cable: RCTV3 ProgrammingMembers of the public wishing to speak during public communication may call at the start of the meeting bydialing (909)774­2751, if speaking on a Public Hearing item, please dial in when the Public Hearing is beingheard at (909)774­2751 to be added to the queue for public comment. Calls will be answered in the orderreceived.The City of Rancho Cucamonga thanks you in advance for taking all precautions to prevent spreading theCOVID­19 virus.If you are an individual with a disability and need a reasonable modification or accommodation pursuant to theAmericans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), please contact the City Clerk's Office at (909) 774­2023, 24 hours prior tothe meeting so that the City can make reasonable arrangements.CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.  TRI­COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael                        Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy                        Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTSD. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSIOND1.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNELUSA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGSLLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY)D2.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.:CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY)D3.CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TOPARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’SINC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRALDISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY)D4.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED ASPARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATINGPARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHOCUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS;REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY)D5.CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODESECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHERLYTERMINUS OF LAYTON STREET SOUTH OF LA MESA DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA;NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OFRANCHO CUCAMONGA REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS FOR NEGOTIATING THE PRICE,TERMS OF PAYMENT, OR BOTH – (CITY)E. RECESS – Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers atCity Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California.REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.COUNCIL CHAMBERSPLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCEROLL CALL:Mayor MichaelMayor Pro Tem KennedyCouncil Members Hutchison, Scott, and SpagnoloA. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDAB. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONSC. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONSMembers of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, andPublic Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire ProtectionDistrict, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council onany item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing SuccessorAgency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previouslyincluded on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public FinancingAuthority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting.Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor,depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to theFire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is aprofessional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audienceand speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting.The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the businessportion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the businessportion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception ofpublic hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other publiccommunications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion ofthe agenda has been completed.CONSENT CALENDARS:The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon atone time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the CityCouncil also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority.Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars.D. CONSENT CALENDAR ­D1.Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of May 5, 2021 and May 19, 2021.D2.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi­Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of$3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month ofApril in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE)D3.Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued toSouthern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE)D4.Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHzRadio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for$147,480 in FY 2021­22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years.(FIRE)D5.Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, ImprovementSecurities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No.SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approvea New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit,Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY)D6.Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street BetweenHermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No.DRC2017­00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release ofBonds. (CITY)D7.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­043) (CITY)D8.Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update.(CITY)D9.Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between theCity of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association.(RESOLUTION NO. 2021­044) (CITY)D10.Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309,Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the SchoolCrosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY)D11.Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10%Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue SidewalkImprovements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY)D12.Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in anAmount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY)D13.Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc.(CO19­085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line ExtensionProject and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY)D14.Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full­Text Reference DatabaseContent to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY)D15.Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuantto Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021­041, 2021­042, FD 2021­008, FD 2021­009, FD 2021­010 AND FD 2021­011) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL)E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTIONF. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)  G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) ­ CITY/FIRE DISTRICTG1.Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan AmendmentDRC2018­00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018­00534 – Alan Smith for ArborExpress Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change theLand Use and Zoning Designation for One Project­Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208­291­03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and forTwo Non­Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208­291­01 and 0208­291­02) FromLow Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to anApproved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the NorthSide of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021­045) (CITY)G2.Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extendingfor an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on theApproval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service StationUses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the CaliforniaEnvironmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY)H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) H1.Verbal Report of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Utilized in Support of Incident Response. (CITY/FIRE) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1.COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) I2.INTER​AGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS:    K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT   CERTIFICATION  I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least Seventy­Two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.  LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909) 477­2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.  CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT “Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community,to create an equitable,sustainable,and vibrant city,rich in opportunity for all to thrive.” Page 7 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 8 May 5, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, May 5, 2021, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy. Absent: Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS None. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA), RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION AND FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES – (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) Page 8 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 8 D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY) D6. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 REGARDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY: (1) REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THM ENTERPRISES, LLC AND LOCATED AT 12449 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBER 0229 031 41. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 REGARDING THE FOLLOWING REAL PROPERTY:(1) REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY WALMART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST AND LOCATED AT 12549 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND FURTHER IDENTIFIED AS SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR’S PARCEL NUMBERS 022903238 & 44. NEGOTIATING PARTIES, JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, REGARDING INSTRUCTIONS TO NEGOTIATORS CONCERNING PRICE. NEGOTIATING PARTIES MAY NEGOTIATE WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS SET FORTH ABOVE. – (CITY) D8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT: 7089 ETIWANDA AVE. (APN 0227- 12156); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833147); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833140); 8340 UTICA AVE. (APN:0208 353 06); 9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:0208 131 83); 9547 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:020815107); 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN: 0208 151- 17); NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND LORI SASSOON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES (VOALA), REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY/FIRE) D9. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(A) SOUTHWEST VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION PROJECT V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; CASE NO. CIVRS 1603632.- (CITY) E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. Page 9 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 8 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on May 5, 2021 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo and Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy. Absent: Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; James L. Markman, City Attorney and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services. Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance. Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and social distancing requirements, City Manager Gillison announced that due to recent changes in the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of Rancho Cucamonga residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings and in place of in-person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes live from the City's website or on RCTV-3. He stated members of the public wishing to speak during public communication or on a public hearing item will need to dial in to (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for comment. Additional information on the Coronavirus pandemic and City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS None. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, the Public Communications portion of the meeting will be conducted telephonically. Via phone call, Janet Walton, offered a prayer and shared information about National Day of Prayer. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular Meetings of April 7, 2021. D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,708,408.16 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,208,670.47 Dated April 12, 2021 Through April 25, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of March, 2021 in the Total Amount of $1,125,870.89. (CITY/FIRE) Page 10 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 8 D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $2,407.80 Dated April 12, 2021 Through April 25, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4. Consideration to Approve Amended Fiscal Year 2020/21 Appropriations. (CITY/FIRE) D5. Consideration to Accept the Public Safety Facility Construction Project as Complete, Approve a Final Contract Amount of $13,575,862.40, File a Notice of Completion, and Release Bonds Accordingly. (FIRE/CITY) D6. Consideration of a Resolution Approving the Annual Local Responsibility Area Wildland Protection Agreement with the California Department of Forestry and Fire in the Amount of $198,090 for FY 2021-22. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-006) (FIRE) D7. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the Fire Support Services Association Employee Group. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039) (FIRE) D8. Consideration of an Improvement Agreement Extension for Tract 20042, Located on the East Side of Carnelian Street and North of Hillside Road, Related to Case No. SUBTT20042, Submitted by New Weaver Lane, LLC. (CITY) D9. Consideration of Amendment No. 9 to Contract Number CO 15-103 with Siemens Mobility, Inc. for Citywide Traffic Signal and Safety Lighting Maintenance Services in the Amount of $1,161,150. (CITY) D10. Consideration of Final Payment for General City Master Plan Drainage Improvements Under Drainage Reimbursement Agreement No. DRA-40 for Tract 17382 and Authorization of an Additional Appropriation of $256,141. (CITY). D11. Consideration to Continue the Existing Local Emergency Due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. (CITY) D12. Consideration of a Resolution Authorizing Examination of Sales and Use Tax Records. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-035) (CITY) D13. Report in Conformance with California Government Code Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 980, Establishing a Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. (CITY) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1 through D13 with Council Member Scott abstaining on item D3 due to her employment with Southern California Gas Company. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION No items. Page 11 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 8 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) F1. Consideration of Adoption of Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Yellowwood Place Connection to Foothill Marketplace Project. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-033) (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-034) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Brian Sandona, Senior Civil Engineer and Regina Danner, Attorney at Richards Watson and Gershon Law, who presented a PowerPoint for Item F1. Together they presented a PowerPoint detailing the Resolutions of Necessity for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Yellowwood Place Connection to Foothill Marketplace Project. Correspondence was received from Palmieri Hennessey & Leifer, LLP and provided to the City Council, in opposition to item F1. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Administrative Hearing. No public communications were made. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing. In response to the correspondence received, Council Member Hutchison inquired on the total size of the easement needed for the project. Senior Civil Engineer Sandona stated that 465 square feet of permanent easement and 330 square feet of temporary easement for construction is needed for the project. City Attorney Markman addressed comments in correspondence submitted by Palmieri Hennessey & Leifer, LLP and stated that the letter did not present viable project alternatives and that the argument has no substance. Council discussion ensued. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Scott, to to adopt Resolution No. 2021-033 and Resolution No. 2021-034 for the Acquisition by Eminent Domain of Certain Real Property Interests for Public Purposes in Connection with the Yellowwood Place Connection to Foothill Marketplace Project. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision to Deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 – Paul Bardos, Applicant. A Request for Site Plan and Architectural Review of a Proposed 4,118 Square Foot Two-Story, Single-Family Residence with an Attached 771 Square Foot Garage and a Request to Construct Retaining Walls up to 4-Feet and 6-Inches High on a 15,430 Square Foot Lot within the Low (L) Residential District and within the Hillside Overlay District at 8035 Camino Predera - APN: 0207-631-03. A Minor Exception was also Requested to Exceed the Maximum Height Limit for Retaining Walls in the Zone. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-037 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2021-038) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Anne McIntosh, Planning Director and Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner who gave a staff report via PowerPoint presentation. Staff provided background information on the appeal noting that the City Council held a public hearing to review the applicant’s appeal of the Planning Commission decision on February 19, 2020; and at that meeting, the City Council recommended that the applicant work with the other Camino Predera property owners to come up with a mutually amicable solution and consider reducing the size of the house by 10 percent and to increase the side yard setbacks to reduce the overall massing of the house. Staff reported that to date, the applicant did not make any changes to the plans since last reviewed Page 12 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 8 by the City Council. Staff recommended that the City Council deny Appeal DRC2019-00975 and uphold the Planning Commission decision to deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018- 00473 for the following reasons: project conflicts with intent of Hillside Design Guidelines; project is incompatible with existing neighborhood and project is inconsistent with General Plan. Correspondence was received by Paul Bardos in opposition to item G1 and provided to the City Council. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Public Hearing. Appellant, Paul Bardos, addressed the City Council on the appeal he submitted on the Planning Commission’s Decision to Deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473. Mr. Bardos spoke on the size/height of the proposed home, building standards, subjective opinions, unfair situation for developers on Camino Predera and referenced Los Angeles Hillside Area Ordinance No. 179883. Mr Bardos noted that the project does meet the building standards. Three (3) public communications were made in opposition to an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision to Deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 via phone call by: Renee Massey, Raquelle Alamat and Mr. Weber; Four (4) public communications were made in support of the proposed project via phone call by: John Adams, Derrick Wilson, Sarah Patel and Jay Adams. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing. Council discussion ensued concerning the size/height of the proposed home, lack of outreach efforts by the applicant and project compatibility. Council Member Spagnolo suggested having a possible noticed community meeting to give an opportunity to the Applicant and Neighbors to reach a resolution within 30 days. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, for Planning Department staff to facilitate a noticed community meeting for the applicant, Paul Bardos, to meet with Camino Predera neighbors to reach a resolution and continue the Public Hearing 30 days to the June 16, 2021 Regular City Council meeting at 7:00PM in Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. Motion failed: 2-2-1; Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy and Council Member Scott opposed; Absent: Mayor Michael. City Manager Gillison noted that the City Council could entertain a different action or consider staff’s recommendation to uphold the Planning Commission’s Decision to Deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 by adoption of Resolution No. 2021-037 and Resolution No. 2021-038. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Scott, to uphold the Planning Commission’s Decision to Deny Hillside Design Review DRC2017-00244 and Minor Exception DRC2018-00473 by adoption of Resolution No. 2021-037 and Resolution No. 2021-038. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael. G2. Consideration of an Appeal of the Planning Commission’s Decision (DRC2021-00104) to Approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 – Saurabh Patel – An Appeal of a Planning Commission Approval of a Request to Construct a 3,300 Square Foot Single-Family Residence with Two Separate Attached 2-Car Garages Totaling 1,063 Square Feet on a Vacant Property of 15,601 Square Feet (0.36-Acre) within the Low (L) Residential District and the Hillside Overlay District Located at 8005 Camino Predera – APN: 0207-631-06. The Project Qualifies as a Class 3 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-036) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Anne McIntosh, Planning Director and Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner who presented via PowerPoint on the background of the project and an analysis that the project had a lower profile with adjacent homes having higher profiles. They spoke on the project’s compatibility and Development Code requirements for projects within the Hillside Overlay District. Staff recommended that the City Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 through the adoption of Resolution No. 2021-036. Page 13 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 8 Correspondence was received from Chuck Buquet in support of appealing the Planning Commission’s decision (DRC2021-00104) to approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 and was provided to the City Council. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Public Hearing. Appellant, Renee Massey, noted that she was representing a group of neighbors and spoke on the significant progress made during community meetings held before the COVID-19 pandemic and adjustments made by the applicant. They requested two adjustments be made to the project which include reduction of the profile of the project and eliminating a 15 foot deck view on the east side of the structure. She concluded by stating that she would prefer the City Council grant the applicant an extension to address the concerns of the project’s profile and sight balcony. Applicant, Rob Patel, addressed the City Council on the submitted appeal. He stated that his proposed project was approved by the City’s Planning Director and noted that the Planning Director’s original decision was based on the project’s consistency with the Development Code. He stated that the appeal has no merit as he has followed topography and adhered to the City’s Development Code. He addressed the proposed project’s sight balcony and stated that the concerns were null and void as adjacent neighbors also have similar sight balconies. Four (4) public communications were made in support of upholding the Planning Commission’s decision (DRC2021-00104) to approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 via phone call by: John Adams, Jay Adams, Paul Bardos and Jane Adams. Three (3) public communications were made in support of appealing the Planning Commission’s decision (DRC2021-00104) to approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020-00016 via phone call by: Catherine Weber, Suzanne Buquet and Chuck Buquet. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked if the appellant, Renee Massey, would like to make any further statements or rebuttal before the hearing was closed. Appellant, Renee Massey, stated that Camino Predera neighbors did not have an opportunity to meet with the applicant to work on a resolution. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing. City Attorney Markman addressed comments made during the open public hearing period regarding view protection laws. He clarified that the City Council does have discretion and authority in view protections, citing the City of Rancho Palos Verdes Ordinance. Council discussion ensued regarding: privacy issues and clarification on the project’s sight balcony, compatibility of the project, the importance of kindness amongst neighbors and previous efforts demonstrated by the applicant. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy asked if Mr. Patel would consider a community meeting with Camino Predera neighbors to discuss the project and come to a resolution. Via teleconference, Applicant, Rob Patel answered that he would not be willing to meet with Camino Predera neighbors as he has met with the neighbors in the past only to be appealed a second time after his efforts. His project did not require a neighborhood meeting and he has already reduced the size of the house. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to adopt Resolution No. 2021-036, upholding the Planning Commission’s decision to approve Hillside Design Review DRC2020- 00016. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael. G3. Public Hearing for Consideration of the Draft 2021-2022 Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant CDBG Program. (CITY) Page 14 May 5, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 8 of 8 City Manager Gillison introduced Flavio Nunez, Management Analyst II, who presented a PowerPoint providing an overview of the Draft 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan including CDBG proposed activities, accomplishment goals and their respective funding amounts. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy opened the Public Hearing. No public communications were made. Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy closed the Public Hearing. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve the Planning Department’s recommendation of approving the 2021-2022 Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant CDBG Program including authorizing submission of the plans to HUD. Motion carried, 4-0-1. Absent: Mayor Michael. H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S) No items. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. I2.INTER­AGENCY UPDATES None. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS None. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. L. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Michael adjourned the City Council Meeting at 9:40p.m. Respectfully submitted, __________________________________ Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: Page 15 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 7 May 19, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY, PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a closed session on Wednesday, May 19, 2021, in the Tri-Communities Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services and Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development. A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) No public communications were made. C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS None. D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR ROBERT NEIUBER, HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) – (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. – (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 – (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE’S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP – (CITY) D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED AT: 7089 ETIWANDA AVE. (APN 0227- 12156); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833147); HAVEN AVE. (APN:020833140); 8340 UTICA AVE. (APN:0208 353 06); 9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:0208 131 83); 9547 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN:020815107); 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD (APN: 0208 151- 17); NEGOTIATING PARTIES Page 16 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 7 JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND LORI SASSOON, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF LOS ANGELES (VOALA), REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. – (CITY/FIRE) D6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION: INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9: (1 CASE) – CITY D7. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8408 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA (THE EPICENTER ENTERTAINMENT & ADULT SPORTS COMPLEX); NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JOHN GILLISION, WILLIAM WITTKOPF, JENNIFER HUNT GRACIA, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND REYNOLDS SPORTS MANAGEMENT; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS – (CITY) E. RECESS The closed session recessed at 6:30 p.m. Page 17 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 3 of 7 REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER – COUNCIL CHAMBERS The regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on May 19, 2021 in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, Assistant City Attorney and Linda A. Troyan, MMC, Director of City Clerk Services. Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance. Responding to the spread of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) and social distancing requirements, City Manager Gillison announced that due to recent changes in the Governor's Executive Orders, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health requirements, and to ensure the health and safety of Rancho Cucamonga residents by limiting contact that could spread the COVID–19 virus, there will be no members of the public in attendance at the City Council/Fire District Meetings and in place of in-person attendance, members of the public are encouraged to watch from the safety of their homes live from the City's website or on RCTV-3. He stated members of the public wishing to speak during public communication or on a public hearing item will need to dial in to (909)774-2751 to be added to the queue for comment. Additional information on the Coronavirus pandemic and City resources and updates can be found at www.cityofrc.us/coronavirus. A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA None. B. ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation Declaring the Month of May 2021, as Mental Health Awareness Month. Joanna Marrufo, Management Aide, City Manager’s Office, shared a PowerPoint presentation showcasing recent and upcoming Healthy RC community events and community engagement efforts promoting a healthy mind, body and environment. Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented the Proclamation to Joanna Marrufo, declaring the month of May 2021, as Mental Health Awareness Month. B2. Presentation of a Proclamation Celebrating Professional Municipal Clerks Week and Recognition of Jasmin Oriel for Receiving the Certified Municipal Clerk (CMC) Designation from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks. Linda Troyan, City Clerk Services Director, provided a PowerPoint presentation featuring City Clerk Staff and acknowledged Jasmin Oriel for receiving the Certified Municipal Clerk (CMC) designation from the International Institute of Municipal Clerks. Mayor Michael presented a Proclamation to the City Clerk’s Office and declared the week of May 2 through May 8, 2021 as Professional Municipal Clerks Week. B3. Presentation of Certificate of Sympathy in Honor of Patricia Morris, Longtime Community Member and Previous Parks and Recreation Commissioner. Mayor Michael announced that tonight’s meeting will be adjourned with a moment of silence in memory of Patricia Morris, a resident of Alta Loma, CA since 1975. He noted that Mrs. Morris was an active community member, having served on the Parks and Recreation Commission of Rancho Cucamonga for twelve years. The Mayor, on behalf of the City Council, expressed heartfelt condolences and presented a Certificate of Sympathy to the Morris family. Page 18 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 4 of 7 C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Michael announced, due to COVID-19 and social distancing requirements, the Public Communications portion of the meeting will be conducted telephonically. Via phone call, Dylan, spoke on water drought conditions, source and supply. He shared his support for Governor Newsom’s response to announce a regional drought emergency and executive actions to bolster drought resilience. Via phone call Frank Valverde, Valverde School of Performing Arts, spoke on the importance of re-opening the Lewis Family Playhouse. Via phone call, Janet Walton, offered a prayer. D. CONSENT CALENDAR D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Regular and Special Meetings of April 21, 2021. D2. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedule as of April 30, 2021 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve the First Amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperative Planning and Development of the San Sevaine Trail in San Bernardino County. (CITY) D4. Consideration of Memorandum's of Understanding (MOU’s) between the Alta Loma, Central and Etiwanda School Districts and the City to Establish Cost-Sharing for the Provision of Crossing Guard Services. (CITY) D5. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File the Notice of Completion and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds for the Tract 18960 Altura Drive, Tejas Court and Wilson Avenue Miscellaneous Asphalt and Concrete Repairs Project. (CITY) D6. Consideration to Accept the Citywide Concrete Repair – FY 2019/2020 Project as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY) D7. Consideration to Accept as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention, and Bonds for the Vineyard Avenue at San Bernardino Road Traffic Signal Modification Project. (CITY) D8. Consideration of Amendment No.1 to the Construction and Maintenance Agreement for Hellman Avenue. (CITY) D9. Consideration to Approve the Use of Midwest Tape to Provide Digital Media Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library Using the Hoopla Platform. (CITY) D10. Consideration to Award Contract to Southern California Sound Image for the “Central Park A/V Update Project” and to Approve Change Order 001 for the Council Chambers A/V Refresh. (CITY) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Council Member Scott, to approve Consent Calendar Items D1 through D10. Motion carried, 5-0. E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) ­ SECOND READING/ADOPTION No items. Page 19 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 7 F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) No items. G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING ITEM(S) – CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-040) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager, who gave a Staff Report via PowerPoint presentation. Ms. Ceballos provided an overview on the mandatory payment program, public hearing notifications and delinquent solid waste accounts as for the accrual period of: January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Ms. Ceballos noted receipt of three (3) written protests from: Deanne Cantu ,Todd Launchbaugh and Sergio Rodriguez. Correspondence received was provided to the City Council. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. Via phone call, Sergio Rodriguez, White Oak Commercial LLC, spoke about the written protest he submitted for a Commercial Property located at 8241 White Oak Avenue. He stated that Burrtec has breached their contract and has not provided waste pick up services. He noted that he has attempted to contact Burrtec staff to resolve the dispute and has not received any response or resolution. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Michael instructed Linda Ceballos, Environmental Programs Manager, to research Mr. Rodriguez’ protest with Burrtec and communicate with Mr. Rodriguez regarding his account status. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to adopt Resolution No. 2021-040, authorizing the placement of Special Assessments and Liens for delinquent solid waste accounts. Motion carried, 5-0. G2. Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution Approving the List of Properties with Nuisance Abatements and Authorizing the Placement of a Special Assessment. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-039) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Jana Cook, Community Improvement Manager, who presented a PowerPoint providing an overview on nuisance abatements, cost recovery efforts and public hearing notifications. Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing. No public communications were made. Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing. Mayor Michael inquired if property owners that were renting to tenants that incurred the nuisance abatement fees due to Cannabis cultivation/ abatement would be responsible in paying the nuisance abatement fees due to the City. Community Improvement Manager Cook clarified that property owners would be responsible for payment of the nuisance abatement fees due to cannabis abatement on their properties. She stated that often times the lease agreements are fraudulent and the Police Department does look extensively into cases involving fraudulent agreements. She noted that State Law does allow for city citations to be dismissed in the event that the property owner is unaware of the violation. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to adopt Resolution No. 2021-039, approving the list of properties with Nuisance Abatements and authorizing the placement of a Special Assessment. Motion carried, 5-0. Page 20 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 6 of 7 H. CITY MANAGERS STAFF REPORT(S) H1. Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning Commission in Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced the item and provided a verbal report on whether to appeal the action of the Planning Commission. City Manager Gillison explained that given the confused nature of the Planning Commission discussion and the lack of clarity around the “healthy” operation of the project, he placed the item on the City Council agenda to determine if the City Council wishes to call the item for appeal. He noted that in the event the item is appealed, staff would then analyze the project using the Healthy Development Checklist as well as any applicable Healthy RC standards; or if the item is not appealed, the project approvals would be final. He noted that correspondence was received from Jonathan Shardlow in opposition to appealing the action of the Planning Commission in approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164. Correspondence received was provided to the City Council. Assistant City Attorney Ghirelli clarified that if the City Council decided to appeal the action of the Planning Commission in approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087, there would be proper legal noticing of the Appeal which would be heard at a noticed Public Hearing at a future City Council Meeting in Council Chambers. Council Member Hutchison stated that he met with the applicants regarding the project, reviewed Planning Commission meetings and opposed appealing the action of the Planning Commission in approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. Council discussion ensued concerning effects of the appeal on the business community and the curent moratorium evaluating the development of gas stations in the City. Council Member Spagnolo supported appealing the Planning Commission decision based on the city’s moratorium evaluating gas stations in the City. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo seconded by Council Member Scott, to appeal the Planning Commission decision based on the city currently evaluating gas stations. Discussion. Council Member Scott shared that after review of the Planning Commission staff reports and meeting livestream, she is in alignment with Council Member Spagnolo’s motion to appeal the Planning Commission’s decision. Mayor Michael expressed support in appealing the Planning Commission’s decision given the confused nature of the Planning Commission meeting discussion and to understand the issue better. MOTION: Moved by Council Member Spagnolo seconded by Council Member Scott, to appeal the Planning Commission decision in approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164, Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. Motion carried, 4-1; Council Member Hutchison opposed. I. COUNCIL BUSINESS I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS None. Page 21 May 19, 2021 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 7 of 7 I2.INTER­AGENCY UPDATES None. J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS None. K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING None. L. ADJOURNMENT L1. Adjournment in Memory of Patricia Morris, Longtime Community Member and Previous Parks and Recreation Commissioner. Mayor Michael adjourned the City Council Meeting at 8:06 p.m in memory of Patricia Morris. Respectfully submitted, __________________________________ Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director Approved: Page 22 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $3,371,860.60 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,643,721.36 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021 and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of April in the Total Amount of $5,720,139.25. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $2,004,242.49 and $1,367,618.11 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $7,852,496.26 and $791,225.10 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Electronic Debit Register amounts are $4,480,569.02 and $1,236,570.23 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1- Weekly Check Register Attachment 2 - Electronic Check Register Page 23 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00012349 04/26/2021 AHUMADA, ALEXANDER R 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012350 04/26/2021 ALMAND, LLOYD 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012351 04/26/2021 BANTAU, VICTORIA 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012352 04/26/2021 BAZAL, SUSAN 0.00 865.08 865.08 AP 00012353 04/26/2021 BELL, MICHAEL L 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012354 04/26/2021 BERRY, DAVID 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012355 04/26/2021 BROCK, ROBIN 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012356 04/26/2021 CAMPBELL, GERALD 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00012357 04/26/2021 CAMPBELL, STEVEN 0.00 1,241.14 1,241.14 AP 00012358 04/26/2021 CARNES, KENNETH 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012359 04/26/2021 CLABBY, RICHARD 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012360 04/26/2021 CLOUGHESY, DONALD R 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012361 04/26/2021 CORCORAN, ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012362 04/26/2021 COSTELLO, DENNIS M 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012363 04/26/2021 COX, KARL 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012364 04/26/2021 CRANE, RALPH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012365 04/26/2021 CROSSLAND, WILBUR 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012366 04/26/2021 CURATALO, JAMES 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012367 04/26/2021 DAGUE, JAMES 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33 AP 00012368 04/26/2021 DE ANTONIO, SUSAN 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012369 04/26/2021 DEANS, JACKIE 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012370 04/26/2021 DOMINICK, SAMUEL A 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012371 04/26/2021 EAGLESON, MICHAEL 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012372 04/26/2021 EGGERS, BOB 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012373 04/26/2021 FEJERAN, TIM 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012374 04/26/2021 FRITCHEY, JOHN D.0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012375 04/26/2021 HEYDE, DONALD 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012376 04/26/2021 INTERLICCHIA, ROSALYN 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012377 04/26/2021 JERKINS, PATRICK 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012378 04/26/2021 KILMER, STEPHEN 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012379 04/26/2021 KIRKPATRICK, WILLIAM M 0.00 841.21 841.21 AP 00012380 04/26/2021 LANE, WILLIAM 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012381 04/26/2021 LARKIN, DAVID W 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012382 04/26/2021 LEE, ALLAN J 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012383 04/26/2021 LENZE, PAUL E 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012384 04/26/2021 LONCAR, PHILIP 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012385 04/26/2021 LONGO, JOE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012386 04/26/2021 LUTTRULL, DARRELL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012387 04/26/2021 MACKALL, BEVERLY 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012388 04/26/2021 MAYFIELD, RON 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012389 04/26/2021 MCKEE, JOHN 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012390 04/26/2021 MCNEIL, KENNETH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012391 04/26/2021 MICHAEL, L. DENNIS 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012392 04/26/2021 MORGAN, BYRON 0.00 1,838.72 1,838.72 AP 00012393 04/26/2021 MYSKOW, DENNIS 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012394 04/26/2021 NAUMAN, MICHAEL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012395 04/26/2021 NEE, RON 0.00 865.08 865.08 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 24 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00012396 04/26/2021 NELSON, MARY JANE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012397 04/26/2021 NOREEN, ERIC 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012398 04/26/2021 O'BRIEN, TOM 0.00 1,379.46 1,379.46 AP 00012399 04/26/2021 PLOUNG, MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00012400 04/26/2021 POST, MICHAEL R 0.00 1,377.34 1,377.34 AP 00012401 04/26/2021 PROULX, PATRICK 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012402 04/26/2021 REDMOND, MIKE 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012403 04/26/2021 ROBERTS, BRENT 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012404 04/26/2021 ROBERTS, CHERYL L 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012405 04/26/2021 ROEDER, JEFF 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012406 04/26/2021 SALISBURY, THOMAS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012407 04/26/2021 SMITH, RONALD 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012408 04/26/2021 SORENSEN, SCOTT D 0.00 1,873.16 1,873.16 AP 00012409 04/26/2021 SPAGNOLO, SAM 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012410 04/26/2021 SPAIN, WILLIAM 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00012411 04/26/2021 SULLIVAN, JAMES 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012412 04/26/2021 TAYLOR, STEVEN 0.00 2,027.69 2,027.69 AP 00012413 04/26/2021 TULEY, TERRY 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012414 04/26/2021 VANDERKALLEN, FRANCIS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012415 04/26/2021 VARNEY, ANTHONY 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012416 04/26/2021 WALTON, KEVIN 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012417 04/26/2021 YOWELL, TIMOTHY A 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012418 04/28/2021 CONFIRE JPA 0.00 183,799.25 183,799.25 AP 00012419 04/29/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 17,510.14 0.00 17,510.14 AP 00012420 04/29/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 37,566.86 0.00 37,566.86 AP 00012421 04/29/2021 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 56.87 0.00 56.87 AP 00012422 04/29/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 2,933.24 0.00 2,933.24 AP 00012423 04/29/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 183.70 0.00 183.70 AP 00012424 04/29/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 0.00 3,083.85 3,083.85 AP 00012425 04/29/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 984.84 0.00 984.84 AP 00012426 04/29/2021 HOSE MAN INC 94.38 0.00 94.38 ***AP 00012428 04/29/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 3,367.94 1,119.50 4,487.44 AP 00012429 04/29/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 883.60 0.00 883.60 AP 00012430 04/29/2021 VISTA PAINT 114.02 0.00 114.02 AP 00012431 05/05/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,891.28 0.00 23,891.28 ***AP 00012432 05/05/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 77,787.88 30,688.97 108,476.85 ***AP 00012433 05/05/2021 FEHR & PEERS 29,536.38 2,706.38 32,242.76 AP 00012434 05/05/2021 HAMPTON YOGA 133.00 0.00 133.00 AP 00012435 05/05/2021 ILAND INTERNET SOLUTIONS 7,517.62 0.00 7,517.62 AP 00012436 05/05/2021 RCCEA 1,540.25 0.00 1,540.25 AP 00012437 05/05/2021 RCPFA 12,931.68 0.00 12,931.68 AP 00012438 05/05/2021 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 177,865.42 0.00 177,865.42 AP 00012439 05/05/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 17,015.60 0.00 17,015.60 AP 00012440 05/05/2021 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00012441 05/05/2021 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 236,411.10 0.00 236,411.10 AP 00012442 05/05/2021 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,802.97 0.00 10,802.97 AP 00012443 05/12/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 13,205.00 0.00 13,205.00 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:2 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 25 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00012444 05/12/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 53,620.18 0.00 53,620.18 AP 00012445 05/12/2021 SARGENT TOWN PLANNING INC 35,160.00 0.00 35,160.00 AP 00012446 05/13/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 1,357.56 0.00 1,357.56 ***AP 00012447 05/13/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 1,635.56 371.01 2,006.57 AP 00012448 05/13/2021 BRODART BOOKS CO 2,148.11 0.00 2,148.11 ***AP 00012449 05/13/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 2,334.55 31.08 2,365.63 AP 00012450 05/13/2021 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 935.93 0.00 935.93 AP 00012451 05/13/2021 ECS IMAGING INC 7,000.00 0.00 7,000.00 AP 00012452 05/13/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 954.55 0.00 954.55 AP 00012453 05/13/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 905.80 0.00 905.80 AP 00012454 05/13/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 3,559.76 0.00 3,559.76 AP 00012455 05/13/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 133.61 133.61 AP 00012456 05/13/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 1,339.59 0.00 1,339.59 ***AP 00012457 05/13/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 3,552.24 316.29 3,868.53 ***AP 00012458 05/13/2021 PSA PRINT GROUP 155.16 38.79 193.95 AP 00012459 05/13/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 39,337.82 0.00 39,337.82 AP 00012460 05/13/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 861.51 0.00 861.51 AP 00012461 05/19/2021 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 15,224.91 0.00 15,224.91 AP 00012462 05/19/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA / RANCHO CUCAMONGA 23,872.15 0.00 23,872.15 AP 00012463 05/19/2021 MOFFATT & NICHOL 32,229.97 0.00 32,229.97 AP 00012464 05/19/2021 RC CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC 100,985.21 0.00 100,985.21 AP 00012465 05/19/2021 RCCEA 1,547.50 0.00 1,547.50 AP 00012466 05/19/2021 RCPFA 12,831.68 0.00 12,831.68 AP 00012467 05/19/2021 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 117,511.03 0.00 117,511.03 AP 00012468 05/19/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 7,310.00 0.00 7,310.00 AP 00012469 05/19/2021 RIVERSIDE, CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00012470 05/19/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 20.00 0.00 20.00 AP 00012471 05/19/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY SHERIFFS DEPT 3,469,378.71 0.00 3,469,378.71 AP 00012472 05/19/2021 WESTERN RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION INFO 127.56 0.00 127.56 ***AP 00012473 05/20/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 734.75 1,041.40 1,776.15 AP 00012474 05/20/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 92.30 0.00 92.30 AP 00012475 05/20/2021 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 112.50 0.00 112.50 AP 00012476 05/20/2021 BSN SPORTS LLC 452.82 0.00 452.82 AP 00012477 05/20/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 19.42 0.00 19.42 AP 00012478 05/20/2021 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT, THE 0.00 148.71 148.71 ***AP 00012479 05/20/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 5,593.30 688.50 6,281.80 AP 00012480 05/20/2021 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUCTS 1,124.76 0.00 1,124.76 ***AP 00012481 05/20/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 2,836.64 1,213.71 4,050.35 AP 00012482 05/20/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 131.89 131.89 AP 00012483 05/20/2021 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 93.74 0.00 93.74 AP 00012484 05/20/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 299.93 0.00 299.93 AP 00012485 05/20/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 117,255.17 0.00 117,255.17 AP 00012486 05/20/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 3,350.96 0.00 3,350.96 AP 00417214 04/26/2021 RODRIGUEZ, VICTOR 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00417215 04/26/2021 TOWNSEND, JAMES 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00417216 04/26/2021 WALKER, KENNETH 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00417217 04/28/2021 A-1 AUTO CARE INC 119.85 0.00 119.85 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:3 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 26 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417218 04/28/2021 ALPHAGRAPHICS 633.10 0.00 633.10 AP 00417219 04/28/2021 ALTA VISTA MOBILE HOME PARK 397.59 0.00 397.59 AP 00417220 04/28/2021 AMS PLANNING & RESEARCH CORP 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00417221 04/28/2021 ASSI SECURITY 851.23 0.00 851.23 AP 00417222 04/28/2021 AUFBAU CORPORATION 0.00 3,475.00 3,475.00 AP 00417223 04/28/2021 AUTOLIFT SERVICES INC 105.00 0.00 105.00 AP 00417224 04/28/2021 BAKER & TAYLOR LLC 126.22 0.00 126.22 AP 00417225 04/28/2021 BARE ESCENTUALS 1,350.00 0.00 1,350.00 AP 00417226 04/28/2021 BISHOP COMPANY 991.15 0.00 991.15 AP 00417227 04/28/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 91,723.85 0.00 91,723.85 AP 00417228 04/28/2021 C V W D 154.23 0.00 154.23 ***AP 00417232 04/28/2021 C V W D 33,254.49 929.64 34,184.13 AP 00417233 04/28/2021 CA LLC - ALTA LAGUNA MHP 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00417234 04/28/2021 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP 56,452.83 0.00 56,452.83 AP 00417235 04/28/2021 CARTER, ASHLEY 0.00 324.00 324.00 AP 00417236 04/28/2021 CASA VOLANTE MOBILE HOME PARK 600.00 0.00 600.00 AP 00417237 04/28/2021 CASTRO, JONATHAN 377.91 0.00 377.91 AP 00417238 04/28/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 7,851.00 0.00 7,851.00 AP 00417239 04/28/2021 CHAPARRAL HEIGHTS MOBILE HOME PARK 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00417240 04/28/2021 CHEN, YIHUA 63.69 0.00 63.69 AP 00417241 04/28/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,087.17 0.00 1,087.17 AP 00417242 04/28/2021 CLIMATEC LLC 7,778.00 0.00 7,778.00 AP 00417243 04/28/2021 COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP 29,151.00 0.00 29,151.00 AP 00417244 04/28/2021 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY CO 0.00 54.29 54.29 ***AP 00417245 04/28/2021 CRAYON SOFTWARE EXPERTS LLC 339,287.04 40,266.98 379,554.02 AP 00417246 04/28/2021 CUMMINS SALES & SERVICE 0.00 1,659.31 1,659.31 AP 00417247 04/28/2021 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 0.00 2,398.92 2,398.92 AP 00417248 04/28/2021 DATA TICKET INC 11,384.92 0.00 11,384.92 AP 00417249 04/28/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00417250 04/28/2021 DEPT OF FORESTRY & FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 194,744.45 194,744.45 AP 00417251 04/28/2021 ECORP CONSULTING INC 0.00 1,301.33 1,301.33 AP 00417252 04/28/2021 EVERDE GROWERS 319.88 0.00 319.88 AP 00417253 04/28/2021 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 360.00 360.00 AP 00417254 04/28/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 326.23 0.00 326.23 AP 00417255 04/28/2021 FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION 8,362.22 0.00 8,362.22 AP 00417256 04/28/2021 FIREFIGHTERS' SAFETY CENTER 0.00 263.99 263.99 AP 00417257 04/28/2021 FOOTHILL FAMILY SHELTER 10,915.00 0.00 10,915.00 AP 00417258 04/28/2021 FRASURE, MICHAEL 184.86 0.00 184.86 AP 00417259 04/28/2021 FUEL SERV 0.00 2,356.00 2,356.00 ***AP 00417260 04/28/2021 GRAINGER 1,344.86 71.88 1,416.74 AP 00417261 04/28/2021 GROVES ON FOOTHILL, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00417262 04/28/2021 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 18,750.00 0.00 18,750.00 AP 00417263 04/28/2021 HENRY SCHEIN INC 0.00 900.71 900.71 AP 00417264 04/28/2021 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 859.60 0.00 859.60 AP 00417265 04/28/2021 HOMETOWN AMERICA RAMONA VILLA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00417266 04/28/2021 HUNG, CHEN 78.22 0.00 78.22 AP 00417267 04/28/2021 IMPERO SOLUTIONS INC 396.00 0.00 396.00 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:4 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 27 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417268 04/28/2021 IMSA 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00417269 04/28/2021 INLAND FAIR HOUSING MEDIATION BOARD 11,370.09 0.00 11,370.09 AP 00417270 04/28/2021 INLAND VALLEY COUNCIL OF CHURCHES 3,872.00 0.00 3,872.00 AP 00417271 04/28/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 347.57 0.00 347.57 AP 00417272 04/28/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 10,200.00 0.00 10,200.00 AP 00417273 04/28/2021 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN INC 245,649.29 0.00 245,649.29 AP 00417274 04/28/2021 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 0.00 2,793.51 2,793.51 AP 00417275 04/28/2021 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 74,446.71 0.00 74,446.71 AP 00417276 04/28/2021 LAPG 1,894.68 0.00 1,894.68 AP 00417277 04/28/2021 LI, ANG 73.97 0.00 73.97 AP 00417278 04/28/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 615.40 615.40 ***AP 00417279 04/28/2021 LOZANO SMITH LLP 2,378.00 3,335.00 5,713.00 AP 00417280 04/28/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 11,321.65 0.00 11,321.65 AP 00417281 04/28/2021 MCI 36.93 0.00 36.93 AP 00417282 04/28/2021 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 31,179.00 0.00 31,179.00 AP 00417283 04/28/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 12.74 0.00 12.74 AP 00417284 04/28/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 165.74 165.74 AP 00417285 04/28/2021 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN & GRAPHICS 1,357.65 0.00 1,357.65 AP 00417286 04/28/2021 NEWMEYER DILLION LLP IOLTA CLIENT TRUST ACCT 30,000.00 0.00 30,000.00 AP 00417287 04/28/2021 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 672.58 0.00 672.58 AP 00417288 04/28/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 13,882.50 0.00 13,882.50 AP 00417289 04/28/2021 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00417290 04/28/2021 PEP BOYS 24.77 0.00 24.77 AP 00417291 04/28/2021 PINES MOBILE HOME PARK, THE 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00417292 04/28/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 0.00 14,918.00 14,918.00 AP 00417293 04/28/2021 PRISTINE UNIFORMS LLC 1,105.23 0.00 1,105.23 AP 00417294 04/28/2021 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY LLC 1,995.00 0.00 1,995.00 AP 00417295 04/28/2021 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING 952.65 0.00 952.65 AP 00417296 04/28/2021 RAMOS, YOLANDA 37.29 0.00 37.29 AP 00417297 04/28/2021 RAMPONE, JANAE 0.00 324.00 324.00 AP 00417298 04/28/2021 RANCHO 11 LLC 271.56 0.00 271.56 AP 00417299 04/28/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 3,333.34 0.00 3,333.34 AP 00417300 04/28/2021 REHABWEST INC 313.50 0.00 313.50 AP 00417301 04/28/2021 RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 11.50 0.00 11.50 AP 00417302 04/28/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 0.00 12,289.88 12,289.88 AP 00417303 04/28/2021 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00417304 04/28/2021 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 0.00 1,064.81 1,064.81 AP 00417305 04/28/2021 SIRSIDYNIX 6,200.00 0.00 6,200.00 AP 00417308 04/28/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 557.42 0.00 557.42 AP 00417311 04/28/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,483.40 0.00 10,483.40 AP 00417312 04/28/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 1,011.51 1,011.51 AP 00417313 04/28/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 66.95 0.00 66.95 AP 00417314 04/28/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 0.00 17,153.22 17,153.22 AP 00417315 04/28/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,711.28 0.00 11,711.28 AP 00417316 04/28/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 11,706.47 0.00 11,706.47 AP 00417317 04/28/2021 SYCAMORE VILLA MOBILE HOME PARK 400.00 0.00 400.00 AP 00417318 04/28/2021 TEAM WEST CONTRACTING CORPORATION 0.00 1,475.00 1,475.00 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:5 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 28 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417319 04/28/2021 TECH RESCUE TRAINERS INC 0.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 AP 00417320 04/28/2021 TIREHUB LLC 3,009.20 0.00 3,009.20 AP 00417321 04/28/2021 TOLL, RICHARD 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00417322 04/28/2021 TULSIANI, TARUN 52.61 0.00 52.61 AP 00417323 04/28/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,147.08 0.00 1,147.08 AP 00417324 04/28/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 14,351.10 0.00 14,351.10 AP 00417325 04/28/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00417326 04/28/2021 ULINE 70.98 0.00 70.98 AP 00417327 04/28/2021 UMARI, FRANCINE 113.21 0.00 113.21 AP 00417328 04/28/2021 UPS 64.53 0.00 64.53 AP 00417329 04/28/2021 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 37.97 37.97 AP 00417330 04/28/2021 VIRGIN PULSE INC 1,075.20 0.00 1,075.20 AP 00417331 04/28/2021 VISION COMMUNICATIONS CO 482.45 0.00 482.45 AP 00417332 04/28/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 76.94 0.00 76.94 AP 00417333 04/28/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 115.18 0.00 115.18 ***AP 00417334 04/28/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 246.38 555.02 801.40 AP 00417335 04/28/2021 WEI-JEN, LEE 109.32 0.00 109.32 AP 00417336 04/28/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 18,954.00 0.00 18,954.00 AP 00417337 04/28/2021 WEST END MATERIAL SUPPLY 648.40 0.00 648.40 AP 00417338 04/28/2021 WILKINSON, DAVID 0.00 324.00 324.00 AP 00417339 04/28/2021 WILL-BURT COMPANY, THE 0.00 341.58 341.58 AP 00417340 04/28/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 268.24 268.24 AP 00417341 04/28/2021 YANG, FANG 144.85 0.00 144.85 AP 00417342 04/28/2021 ZEP SALES AND SERVICE 772.72 0.00 772.72 AP 00417465 05/05/2021 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 7,377.50 7,377.50 AP 00417466 05/05/2021 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 548.55 0.00 548.55 AP 00417467 05/05/2021 ABSG CONSULTING INC 5,760.00 0.00 5,760.00 AP 00417468 05/05/2021 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 538.38 0.00 538.38 AP 00417469 05/05/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00417470 05/05/2021 ALCORN, RICHARD 43.31 0.00 43.31 AP 00417471 05/05/2021 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT INC 0.00 58,139.75 58,139.75 AP 00417472 05/05/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00417473 05/05/2021 APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS INC 5,477.00 0.00 5,477.00 AP 00417474 05/05/2021 ASSI SECURITY 1,285.00 0.00 1,285.00 AP 00417475 05/05/2021 ATLAS PLANNING SOLUTIONS 4,295.00 0.00 4,295.00 AP 00417476 05/05/2021 BEE REMOVERS 0.00 425.00 425.00 AP 00417477 05/05/2021 BIBB, HILDA 100.50 0.00 100.50 AP 00417478 05/05/2021 BMP INTERNATIONAL INC 401.00 0.00 401.00 AP 00417479 05/05/2021 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 462.05 0.00 462.05 AP 00417480 05/05/2021 C V W D 165.80 0.00 165.80 ***AP 00417486 05/05/2021 C V W D 56,159.02 357.65 56,516.67 AP 00417487 05/05/2021 CAL FIRE / STATE FIRE MARSHAL 0.00 440.00 440.00 AP 00417488 05/05/2021 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00417489 05/05/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52 AP 00417490 05/05/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00417491 05/05/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00417492 05/05/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:6 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 29 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417493 05/05/2021 CAMPOS, RICARDO 144.41 0.00 144.41 AP 00417494 05/05/2021 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP 36,534.23 0.00 36,534.23 AP 00417495 05/05/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 58,777.25 0.00 58,777.25 AP 00417496 05/05/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 864.00 864.00 ***AP 00417497 05/05/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,690.58 6,437.38 11,127.96 AP 00417498 05/05/2021 CHEMICAL SAFETY TRAINING 0.00 8,200.00 8,200.00 AP 00417499 05/05/2021 CLIENT FIRST CONSULTING GROUP LLC 618.75 0.00 618.75 AP 00417500 05/05/2021 CONSUMERS PIPE & SUPPLY CO 0.00 27.93 27.93 AP 00417501 05/05/2021 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 3,841.61 0.00 3,841.61 AP 00417502 05/05/2021 CREATIVE BRAIN LEARNING LLC 31.50 0.00 31.50 AP 00417503 05/05/2021 CRISTLER, HEATHER 71.00 0.00 71.00 AP 00417504 05/05/2021 CUMMINS SALES & SERVICE 0.00 1,330.28 1,330.28 AP 00417505 05/05/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,172.93 0.00 1,172.93 AP 00417506 05/05/2021 DAISYECO INC 2,558.60 0.00 2,558.60 AP 00417507 05/05/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,143.24 0.00 1,143.24 AP 00417508 05/05/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 41,163.90 0.00 41,163.90 AP 00417509 05/05/2021 DEPINHO ROOFING INC 320.02 0.00 320.02 AP 00417510 05/05/2021 DP SOLUTIONS INC 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.00 AP 00417511 05/05/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 37.75 0.00 37.75 AP 00417512 05/05/2021 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.00 1,157.24 1,157.24 AP 00417513 05/05/2021 FRANKLIN TRUCK PARTS INC 0.00 1,883.47 1,883.47 AP 00417514 05/05/2021 FUEL SERV 0.00 754.98 754.98 AP 00417515 05/05/2021 G & M BUSINESS INTERIORS 613.52 0.00 613.52 AP 00417516 05/05/2021 GARCIA, MELINDA 91.37 0.00 91.37 ***AP 00417517 05/05/2021 GRAINGER 795.19 694.64 1,489.83 ***AP 00417518 05/05/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 2,831.15 120.38 2,951.53 AP 00417519 05/05/2021 HAMILTON, MONIQUE 280.00 0.00 280.00 AP 00417520 05/05/2021 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00417521 05/05/2021 HMC ARCHITECTS 5,267.50 0.00 5,267.50 AP 00417522 05/05/2021 INLAND DESERT SECURITY & COMMUNICATIONS INC 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00417523 05/05/2021 INLAND SOCAL MEDIA GROUP LLC 1,795.00 0.00 1,795.00 AP 00417524 05/05/2021 INLAND TOPSOIL MIXES 646.50 0.00 646.50 AP 00417525 05/05/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 0.00 1,110.69 1,110.69 AP 00417526 05/05/2021 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50 AP 00417527 05/05/2021 IPERMIT 308.81 0.00 308.81 AP 00417528 05/05/2021 JACKSON-HIRSH INC 252.54 0.00 252.54 AP 00417529 05/05/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 1,449.00 0.00 1,449.00 AP 00417530 05/05/2021 K-K WOODWORKING 41.45 0.00 41.45 AP 00417531 05/05/2021 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 623.25 0.00 623.25 AP 00417532 05/05/2021 LEONIDA BUILDERS INC 19,650.00 0.00 19,650.00 AP 00417533 05/05/2021 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 5,281.00 0.00 5,281.00 ***AP 00417535 05/05/2021 LOWES COMPANIES INC 5,939.04 842.31 6,781.35 AP 00417536 05/05/2021 LUCIEN, DOMINIQUE 462.56 0.00 462.56 AP 00417537 05/05/2021 MACK F W JR & C G REV TRUST 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00417538 05/05/2021 MADRID, STACEY 127.00 0.00 127.00 AP 00417539 05/05/2021 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 14,505.00 0.00 14,505.00 AP 00417540 05/05/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 667.83 0.00 667.83 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:7 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 30 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417541 05/05/2021 MC GRATH RENTCORP 216.18 0.00 216.18 AP 00417542 05/05/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 70.61 0.00 70.61 AP 00417543 05/05/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 1,091.34 0.00 1,091.34 AP 00417544 05/05/2021 MUSIC STAR 41.30 0.00 41.30 AP 00417545 05/05/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 1,391.27 1,391.27 AP 00417546 05/05/2021 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00417547 05/05/2021 NEGRETE, ALLEN 244.58 0.00 244.58 AP 00417548 05/05/2021 NEWSBANK INC 8,285.00 0.00 8,285.00 AP 00417549 05/05/2021 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 451.26 0.00 451.26 ***AP 00417550 05/05/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 592.24 233.56 825.80 AP 00417551 05/05/2021 PELLOM, CARRIE 137.60 0.00 137.60 AP 00417552 05/05/2021 PHILLIPS, JENIFER 163.58 0.00 163.58 AP 00417553 05/05/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00417554 05/05/2021 QUADIENT INC 594.87 0.00 594.87 AP 00417555 05/05/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA QUAKES 12,900.00 0.00 12,900.00 AP 00417556 05/05/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 230.41 0.00 230.41 AP 00417557 05/05/2021 ROMERO, SONNY 237.43 0.00 237.43 AP 00417558 05/05/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CO FIRE DEPT 62,064.77 0.00 62,064.77 AP 00417559 05/05/2021 SBPEA 2,477.28 0.00 2,477.28 AP 00417560 05/05/2021 SENOR SEPTIC CONSTRUCTION & PUMPING INC 444.41 0.00 444.41 AP 00417561 05/05/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00417562 05/05/2021 SILVER & WRIGHT LLP 8,917.24 0.00 8,917.24 ***AP 00417564 05/05/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 112.65 11.26 123.91 AP 00417565 05/05/2021 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,132.00 0.00 2,132.00 AP 00417568 05/05/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 3,580.92 0.00 3,580.92 AP 00417569 05/05/2021 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,197.65 0.00 1,197.65 AP 00417570 05/05/2021 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 3,734.12 0.00 3,734.12 AP 00417571 05/05/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 1,390.00 0.00 1,390.00 AP 00417572 05/05/2021 SUNSET OUTDOOR CREATIONS 793.26 0.00 793.26 AP 00417573 05/05/2021 SYSTEMS SOURCE INC 0.00 19,801.28 19,801.28 AP 00417574 05/05/2021 TAU PSY.D, MANNY 1,322.80 0.00 1,322.80 AP 00417575 05/05/2021 TIREHUB LLC 713.76 0.00 713.76 AP 00417576 05/05/2021 TORGA ELECTRICAL 27,295.00 0.00 27,295.00 AP 00417577 05/05/2021 TRIDEN GROUP CORP 6,400.00 0.00 6,400.00 AP 00417578 05/05/2021 TRUJANO ROOFING 389.70 0.00 389.70 AP 00417579 05/05/2021 UNITED SITE SERVICES OF CA INC 301.45 0.00 301.45 AP 00417580 05/05/2021 UPS 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00417581 05/05/2021 VALDERRAMA, ANGELO 243.35 0.00 243.35 AP 00417582 05/05/2021 VCLOUD TECH INC 449.01 0.00 449.01 AP 00417583 05/05/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 147.91 0.00 147.91 AP 00417584 05/05/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 200.88 0.00 200.88 AP 00417585 05/05/2021 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00417586 05/05/2021 YOUNG REMBRANDTS 112.00 0.00 112.00 AP 00417587 05/12/2021 A Y NURSERY INC 2,618.33 0.00 2,618.33 AP 00417588 05/12/2021 A-1 AUTO CARE INC 519.35 0.00 519.35 ***AP 00417589 05/12/2021 ACIRAS INC 9,830.00 4,210.00 14,040.00 AP 00417590 05/12/2021 ADAMS, SHANE 0.00 939.20 939.20 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:8 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 31 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417591 05/12/2021 AIR & HOSE SOURCE INC 741.21 0.00 741.21 AP 00417592 05/12/2021 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00417593 05/12/2021 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 145.35 0.00 145.35 ***AP 00417594 05/12/2021 ARTISTIC RESOURCES CORPORATION 28,003.00 16,320.00 44,323.00 ***AP 00417595 05/12/2021 AUFBAU CORPORATION 19,987.50 9,837.50 29,825.00 AP 00417596 05/12/2021 BARBARA'S ANSWERING SERVICE 1,104.00 0.00 1,104.00 AP 00417597 05/12/2021 BILL & WAGS INC 187.50 0.00 187.50 AP 00417598 05/12/2021 BOB'S MUFFLER SHOP 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00417599 05/12/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 16,797.50 0.00 16,797.50 AP 00417600 05/12/2021 C P GENERATOR INC 77.58 0.00 77.58 ***AP 00417601 05/12/2021 C V W D 802.15 865.88 1,668.03 ***AP 00417606 05/12/2021 C V W D 81,609.16 27.60 81,636.76 AP 00417607 05/12/2021 CALIX INC 6,295.00 0.00 6,295.00 AP 00417608 05/12/2021 CAMBRIDGE SEVEN ASSOCIATES INC 53,334.00 0.00 53,334.00 AP 00417609 05/12/2021 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 61.00 0.00 61.00 AP 00417610 05/12/2021 CARVER CONSTRUCTION & ELECTRICAL 142.59 0.00 142.59 AP 00417611 05/12/2021 CHINO MOWER & ENGINE SERVICE 697.25 0.00 697.25 AP 00417612 05/12/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 2,416.97 0.00 2,416.97 AP 00417613 05/12/2021 CITY CLERKS ASSOCIATION OF CALIF 5.00 0.00 5.00 AP 00417614 05/12/2021 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 117.28 0.00 117.28 AP 00417615 05/12/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,287.54 0.00 2,287.54 AP 00417616 05/12/2021 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 2,197.97 0.00 2,197.97 AP 00417617 05/12/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 11.00 0.00 11.00 AP 00417618 05/12/2021 DIRECTV 179.99 0.00 179.99 AP 00417619 05/12/2021 E GROUP, THE 450.00 0.00 450.00 AP 00417620 05/12/2021 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT 50,622.44 0.00 50,622.44 AP 00417621 05/12/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 256.00 0.00 256.00 AP 00417622 05/12/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 72.83 0.00 72.83 AP 00417623 05/12/2021 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 606.58 606.58 AP 00417624 05/12/2021 FLEETPRIDE 0.00 42.80 42.80 AP 00417625 05/12/2021 FORTIN LAW GROUP 1,487.50 0.00 1,487.50 ***AP 00417627 05/12/2021 FRONTIER COMM 3,084.17 730.77 3,814.94 AP 00417628 05/12/2021 GLOBALSTAR USA 159.32 0.00 159.32 AP 00417629 05/12/2021 GOLDSTONE K-9 LLC 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 AP 00417630 05/12/2021 GOSE, DALE 434.00 0.00 434.00 ***AP 00417631 05/12/2021 GRAINGER 2,685.76 97.85 2,783.61 AP 00417632 05/12/2021 GRAPHICS FACTORY PRINTING INC 185.87 0.00 185.87 ***AP 00417633 05/12/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 370.06 39.44 409.50 AP 00417634 05/12/2021 HAAKER EQUIPMENT COMPANY 423.64 0.00 423.64 AP 00417635 05/12/2021 HERITAGE CUSTOM LANDSCAPES INC 76,392.35 0.00 76,392.35 AP 00417636 05/12/2021 HI-WAY SAFETY INC 603.40 0.00 603.40 AP 00417637 05/12/2021 HILO COLLISION CENTER 825.41 0.00 825.41 AP 00417638 05/12/2021 HLP INC 212.10 0.00 212.10 AP 00417639 05/12/2021 HOYT LUMBER CO, S M 0.00 3.86 3.86 AP 00417640 05/12/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 302.79 0.00 302.79 AP 00417641 05/12/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 524.16 0.00 524.16 AP 00417642 05/12/2021 ITRON INC 7,343.36 0.00 7,343.36 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:9 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 32 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417643 05/12/2021 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 1,617.36 0.00 1,617.36 AP 00417644 05/12/2021 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 48,354.63 0.00 48,354.63 AP 00417645 05/12/2021 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.1,566.95 0.00 1,566.95 AP 00417646 05/12/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 2,358.78 2,358.78 AP 00417647 05/12/2021 LISA WISE CONSULTING 16,951.25 0.00 16,951.25 AP 00417648 05/12/2021 LOGRHYTHM INC 28,800.00 0.00 28,800.00 AP 00417650 05/12/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 187,417.11 0.00 187,417.11 AP 00417651 05/12/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 214.64 0.00 214.64 AP 00417652 05/12/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 2,537.24 0.00 2,537.24 AP 00417653 05/12/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 105.47 0.00 105.47 AP 00417654 05/12/2021 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 ***AP 00417655 05/12/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 31.16 11.97 43.13 AP 00417656 05/12/2021 NATIONAL CNG & FLEET SERVICE 2,405.09 0.00 2,405.09 AP 00417657 05/12/2021 NATIONAL PEN CO LLC 156.24 0.00 156.24 AP 00417658 05/12/2021 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN & GRAPHICS 181.01 0.00 181.01 AP 00417659 05/12/2021 NEW URBAN REALTY ADVISORS INC 11,925.76 0.00 11,925.76 AP 00417660 05/12/2021 NEWCO DIST INC 6,127.00 0.00 6,127.00 AP 00417661 05/12/2021 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 869.76 0.00 869.76 AP 00417662 05/12/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 2,828.42 0.00 2,828.42 AP 00417663 05/12/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 10,780.00 0.00 10,780.00 AP 00417664 05/12/2021 PATTON SALES CORP 412.74 0.00 412.74 AP 00417665 05/12/2021 PEP BOYS 17.16 0.00 17.16 ***AP 00417666 05/12/2021 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 12,722.83 248.36 12,971.19 AP 00417667 05/12/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 25,110.02 0.00 25,110.02 AP 00417668 05/12/2021 POSTAL PERFECT 180.00 0.00 180.00 AP 00417669 05/12/2021 PROFORMA PRINTING SYSTEMS 672.30 0.00 672.30 AP 00417670 05/12/2021 PROHEALTH PARTNERS A MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 900.00 900.00 AP 00417671 05/12/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 629.30 0.00 629.30 AP 00417672 05/12/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 165.23 0.00 165.23 AP 00417673 05/12/2021 RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT 145.43 0.00 145.43 AP 00417674 05/12/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 260.00 260.00 AP 00417675 05/12/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 15,435.15 0.00 15,435.15 AP 00417676 05/12/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CTY FIRE PROTECTION DIST 420.00 0.00 420.00 ***AP 00417677 05/12/2021 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 483.45 197.35 680.80 AP 00417678 05/12/2021 SHINE & SPARKLE CLEANING SERVICES 97.00 0.00 97.00 AP 00417679 05/12/2021 SHOETERIA INC 644.82 0.00 644.82 AP 00417680 05/12/2021 SHRED PROS 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00417681 05/12/2021 SIGN SHOP, THE 336.72 0.00 336.72 AP 00417682 05/12/2021 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 279.53 0.00 279.53 AP 00417683 05/12/2021 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 254.99 0.00 254.99 AP 00417684 05/12/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 550.52 550.52 ***AP 00417689 05/12/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 7,253.08 950.99 8,204.07 AP 00417690 05/12/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 45.38 0.00 45.38 AP 00417691 05/12/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,116.97 0.00 1,116.97 ***AP 00417692 05/12/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 720.00 740.00 1,460.00 AP 00417693 05/12/2021 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 315.77 0.00 315.77 AP 00417694 05/12/2021 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 5,375.00 0.00 5,375.00 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:10 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 33 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417695 05/12/2021 TIREHUB LLC 1,032.47 0.00 1,032.47 AP 00417696 05/12/2021 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 230.90 0.00 230.90 AP 00417697 05/12/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 1,103.96 0.00 1,103.96 AP 00417698 05/12/2021 U.S. BANK PARS ACCT #6746022500 21,239.16 0.00 21,239.16 AP 00417699 05/12/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00417700 05/12/2021 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 384.15 384.15 AP 00417701 05/12/2021 UPSCO POWERSAFE SYSTEMS INC 22,797.21 0.00 22,797.21 AP 00417702 05/12/2021 USHINDI TRANSPORTATION COMPANY UTC 226.41 0.00 226.41 AP 00417703 05/12/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 172.59 0.00 172.59 AP 00417704 05/12/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 298.35 0.00 298.35 AP 00417705 05/12/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 485.32 0.00 485.32 AP 00417706 05/12/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 0.00 5,520.41 5,520.41 AP 00417707 05/12/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 5,534.87 0.00 5,534.87 AP 00417708 05/12/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS - LA 516.66 0.00 516.66 AP 00417709 05/12/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 512.79 0.00 512.79 AP 00417710 05/12/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 315.78 0.00 315.78 AP 00417711 05/12/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 2,788.08 0.00 2,788.08 AP 00417712 05/12/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 23,952.00 0.00 23,952.00 AP 00417713 05/12/2021 WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL INC 343.38 0.00 343.38 AP 00417714 05/12/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 665.75 0.00 665.75 AP 00417715 05/12/2021 XEROX CORPORATION 281.09 0.00 281.09 AP 00417716 05/19/2021 ABDUL-RAHMAN, NAKEDA 85.35 0.00 85.35 AP 00417717 05/19/2021 ABLE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,352.10 0.00 5,352.10 AP 00417718 05/19/2021 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 323.34 0.00 323.34 AP 00417719 05/19/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00417720 05/19/2021 ALLEN INDUSTRIES INC 244.29 0.00 244.29 AP 00417721 05/19/2021 ARCHIBALD PET HOSPITAL 200.00 0.00 200.00 AP 00417722 05/19/2021 ASSI SECURITY 525.00 0.00 525.00 AP 00417723 05/19/2021 BASELINE ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00417724 05/19/2021 BLESSED FARM 429.00 0.00 429.00 AP 00417725 05/19/2021 BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM ANIMAL HEALTH USA INC 160.89 0.00 160.89 AP 00417726 05/19/2021 BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP 67.50 0.00 67.50 ***AP 00417727 05/19/2021 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 5,698.50 917.00 6,615.50 ***AP 00417730 05/19/2021 C V W D 26,860.51 753.40 27,613.91 AP 00417731 05/19/2021 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 ***AP 00417732 05/19/2021 CALIF DEPT OF TAX & FEE ADMINISTRATION 24.07 338.27 362.34 AP 00417733 05/19/2021 CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER 3,685.20 0.00 3,685.20 AP 00417734 05/19/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00417735 05/19/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52 AP 00417736 05/19/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00417737 05/19/2021 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00417738 05/19/2021 CASTILLO, JESSIE 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00417739 05/19/2021 CATO, JULIA 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00417740 05/19/2021 CENTER AVENUE INDUSTRIAL LLC 15,000.00 0.00 15,000.00 AP 00417741 05/19/2021 CENTER STAGE TURF INC 850.00 0.00 850.00 AP 00417742 05/19/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 0.00 4,618.45 4,618.45 AP 00417743 05/19/2021 CHANG, YU CHUNG 47.80 0.00 47.80 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:11 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 34 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417744 05/19/2021 CHEN, WEI 89.14 0.00 89.14 AP 00417745 05/19/2021 CHESNUT, MICHELLE 62.97 0.00 62.97 AP 00417746 05/19/2021 CHINO MOWER & ENGINE SERVICE 5,999.80 0.00 5,999.80 AP 00417747 05/19/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 384.95 384.95 AP 00417748 05/19/2021 CODING MINDS INC 91.00 0.00 91.00 AP 00417749 05/19/2021 CONOR CONSULTING LLC 337.50 0.00 337.50 AP 00417750 05/19/2021 COVETRUS NORTH AMERICA 719.57 0.00 719.57 AP 00417751 05/19/2021 CRIME SCENE STERI-CLEAN LLC 540.00 0.00 540.00 AP 00417752 05/19/2021 D & K CONCRETE COMPANY 1,563.46 0.00 1,563.46 AP 00417753 05/19/2021 DALTON, NICOLE 2,300.00 0.00 2,300.00 AP 00417754 05/19/2021 DANCE TERRIFIC 45.50 0.00 45.50 AP 00417755 05/19/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 529.00 0.00 529.00 AP 00417756 05/19/2021 DIRECTV 74.99 0.00 74.99 AP 00417757 05/19/2021 DISTLER, DIANA 66.42 0.00 66.42 AP 00417758 05/19/2021 DOMINQUEZ, DANIEL 84.51 0.00 84.51 AP 00417759 05/19/2021 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 720.00 720.00 AP 00417760 05/19/2021 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00417761 05/19/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 30.95 0.00 30.95 AP 00417762 05/19/2021 FIELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIATES 552.00 0.00 552.00 AP 00417763 05/19/2021 FIRE APPARATUS SOLUTIONS 0.00 3,071.55 3,071.55 AP 00417764 05/19/2021 FIRE SMART PROMOTIONS 0.00 1,508.50 1,508.50 AP 00417765 05/19/2021 FORTUNE FENCING 810.00 0.00 810.00 AP 00417766 05/19/2021 FRONTIER COMM 162.21 0.00 162.21 AP 00417767 05/19/2021 FUEL SERV 4,471.84 0.00 4,471.84 AP 00417768 05/19/2021 GALLARDO, ERNEST 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00417769 05/19/2021 GATEWAY PET CEMETERY & CREMATORY 240.00 0.00 240.00 AP 00417770 05/19/2021 GILLISON, JOHN 791.91 0.00 791.91 AP 00417771 05/19/2021 GOLDEN OAKS VET HOSPITAL 250.00 0.00 250.00 AP 00417772 05/19/2021 GONSALVES & SON, JOE A 3,000.00 0.00 3,000.00 AP 00417773 05/19/2021 GRAINGER 686.20 0.00 686.20 ***AP 00417774 05/19/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 349.86 201.01 550.87 AP 00417775 05/19/2021 GREEN X TURF & LANDSCAPING 700.00 0.00 700.00 AP 00417776 05/19/2021 GUTIERREZ, RENE 99.78 0.00 99.78 AP 00417777 05/19/2021 HD PRODUCTIONS INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00417778 05/19/2021 HERNANDEZ SOTO, IRMA 114.60 0.00 114.60 AP 00417779 05/19/2021 HESKA CORPORATION 334.03 0.00 334.03 AP 00417780 05/19/2021 HMC ARCHITECTS 570.00 0.00 570.00 AP 00417781 05/19/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 12,649.00 0.00 12,649.00 AP 00417782 05/19/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 1,506.00 0.00 1,506.00 AP 00417783 05/19/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 567.00 0.00 567.00 AP 00417784 05/19/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 8,374.00 0.00 8,374.00 AP 00417785 05/19/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 8,279.00 0.00 8,279.00 AP 00417786 05/19/2021 HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN BERNARDINO VALLEY 170.00 0.00 170.00 AP 00417787 05/19/2021 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 1,699.09 0.00 1,699.09 AP 00417788 05/19/2021 IE INC 63.00 0.00 63.00 AP 00417789 05/19/2021 INNOVATIVE INTERFACES INC 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 AP 00417790 05/19/2021 INTERVET INC 323.25 0.00 323.25 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:12 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 35 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount ***AP 00417791 05/19/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 13,136.40 2,519.56 15,655.96 AP 00417792 05/19/2021 JESSEN, CLIFFORD LEROY 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00417793 05/19/2021 JOHNNY ALLEN TENNIS ACADEMY 2,091.00 0.00 2,091.00 AP 00417794 05/19/2021 JUAREZ, ELIZABETH 103.00 0.00 103.00 AP 00417795 05/19/2021 KEITH, JORRY 126.00 0.00 126.00 AP 00417796 05/19/2021 KIRK, LAURIE BECKER 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00417797 05/19/2021 KLEIN PRODUCTS 130.02 0.00 130.02 AP 00417798 05/19/2021 KNIGHT LEADERSHIP SOLUTIONS 1,410.00 0.00 1,410.00 AP 00417799 05/19/2021 LADUKE, SHELLY 55.00 0.00 55.00 AP 00417800 05/19/2021 LANDSCAPE WEST MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 54,308.75 0.00 54,308.75 AP 00417801 05/19/2021 LAYTON, SHELLY 9.00 0.00 9.00 AP 00417802 05/19/2021 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,482.10 0.00 5,482.10 AP 00417803 05/19/2021 LUO, LIXIA 9.99 0.00 9.99 AP 00417804 05/19/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 161.63 0.00 161.63 AP 00417805 05/19/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 143,094.41 0.00 143,094.41 AP 00417806 05/19/2021 MARLINK INC 0.00 162.99 162.99 AP 00417807 05/19/2021 MARSHALL, SYLVIA 351.00 0.00 351.00 AP 00417808 05/19/2021 MCI 36.93 0.00 36.93 ***AP 00417809 05/19/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 56.79 34.45 91.24 AP 00417810 05/19/2021 MEDIWASTE DISPOSAL LLC 40.00 0.00 40.00 AP 00417811 05/19/2021 MG PETROLEUM INC 393.00 0.00 393.00 AP 00417813 05/19/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 3,845.42 0.00 3,845.42 AP 00417814 05/19/2021 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 0.00 405.03 405.03 AP 00417815 05/19/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 272.89 0.00 272.89 AP 00417816 05/19/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 0.00 280.50 280.50 AP 00417817 05/19/2021 NEXTECH SYSTEMS INC 31,927.80 0.00 31,927.80 AP 00417818 05/19/2021 NYIRADY, JANICE 60.53 0.00 60.53 AP 00417819 05/19/2021 ONLY CREMATIONS FOR PETS INC 1,170.00 0.00 1,170.00 AP 00417820 05/19/2021 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00417821 05/19/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 497.00 0.00 497.00 AP 00417822 05/19/2021 PACIFIC WESTERN BANK 5,315.01 0.00 5,315.01 AP 00417823 05/19/2021 PAPAZOGLU, NORAY 216.00 0.00 216.00 AP 00417824 05/19/2021 PATTON, DEREK 434.13 0.00 434.13 AP 00417825 05/19/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00417826 05/19/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 26.94 0.00 26.94 AP 00417827 05/19/2021 ROBINSON, PHYLLIS 75.00 0.00 75.00 AP 00417828 05/19/2021 RUFFALO, CHRISTOPHER 7.70 0.00 7.70 AP 00417829 05/19/2021 SBPEA 2,466.49 0.00 2,466.49 AP 00417830 05/19/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00417831 05/19/2021 SHRED PROS 176.00 0.00 176.00 AP 00417832 05/19/2021 SIRSIDYNIX 2,449.86 0.00 2,449.86 AP 00417833 05/19/2021 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 862.99 0.00 862.99 AP 00417835 05/19/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 434.58 0.00 434.58 AP 00417836 05/19/2021 SOCAL PPE 0.00 40.95 40.95 AP 00417837 05/19/2021 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 2,015.80 0.00 2,015.80 AP 00417841 05/19/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 77,386.07 0.00 77,386.07 AP 00417842 05/19/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 427.70 0.00 427.70 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:13 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 36 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount AP 00417843 05/19/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 628.41 0.00 628.41 ***AP 00417844 05/19/2021 STERLING COFFEE SERVICE 1,043.14 243.17 1,286.31 AP 00417845 05/19/2021 SUPERION LLC 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00417846 05/19/2021 TERRA VISTA ANIMAL HOSPITAL 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00417847 05/19/2021 TINKER GLASS CONTRACTORS INC 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AP 00417848 05/19/2021 TOXGUARD FLUID TECHNOLOGIES INC 763.31 0.00 763.31 AP 00417849 05/19/2021 ULINE 449.73 0.00 449.73 AP 00417850 05/19/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00417851 05/19/2021 VALENZUELA, NICOLE 633.00 0.00 633.00 AP 00417852 05/19/2021 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 63.70 0.00 63.70 AP 00417853 05/19/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTER 0.00 969.36 969.36 ***AP 00417854 05/19/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 398.63 1,950.78 2,349.41 AP 00417855 05/19/2021 VERIZON 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00417856 05/19/2021 VICTOR MEDICAL COMPANY 2,728.79 0.00 2,728.79 AP 00417857 05/19/2021 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,600.77 0.00 10,600.77 AP 00417858 05/19/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 75.52 0.00 75.52 AP 00417859 05/19/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,888.00 0.00 1,888.00 AP 00417860 05/19/2021 WEI, YUXUAN 88.50 0.00 88.50 AP 00417861 05/19/2021 WELLS, JUDITH 41.25 0.00 41.25 AP 00417862 05/19/2021 WHITE, VANNESSA 39.51 0.00 39.51 AP 00417863 05/19/2021 WILSON & BELL AUTO SERVICE 205.00 0.00 205.00 AP 00417864 05/19/2021 WOLFE, SARAH 44.80 0.00 44.80 AP 00417865 05/19/2021 YOUNG GUN 1 PERFORMANCE COATINGS 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00417866 05/19/2021 ZEP SALES AND SERVICE 794.48 0.00 794.48 AP 00417867 05/19/2021 ZOETIS US LLC 876.87 0.00 876.87 AP 00417868 05/20/2021 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 114,750.00 0.00 114,750.00 $7,852,496.26 $8,643,721.36 $791,225.10 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 08:27:22 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:14 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 37 DATE DESCRIPTION CITY FIRE AMOUNT 4/1 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 305.13 305.13 4/1 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 100.60 100.60 4/2 Bank Fee 96.50 - 96.50 4/5 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 1,023.13 1,023.13 4/5 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 268.14 268.14 4/6 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 2,250.00 2,250.00 4/6 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 4,012.35 4,012.35 4/6 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 5,063.06 5,063.06 4/7 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 382.50 382.50 4/8 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 3,759.03 3,759.03 4/8 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 54,112.51 54,112.51 4/8 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 109,128.63 109,128.63 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,240.66 3,240.66 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,339.74 3,339.74 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,879.03 4,879.03 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,852.36 10,852.36 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 27,269.17 27,269.17 4/8 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 114,575.46 114,575.46 4/8 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,534.45 3,534.45 4/8 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50 4/8 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 506.87 506.87 4/8 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 9.15 9.15 4/9 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 4/9 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,742.78 1,742.78 4/12 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 113.23 113.23 4/14 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 113.23 113.23 4/15 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 339.69 339.69 4/16 WIRE PAYMENT - Debt Service Paymnet 224,508.85 224,508.85 4/16 WIRE PAYMENT - Debt Service Paymnet 455,187.50 455,187.50 4/16 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 59.45 59.45 4/16 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 500.00 500.00 4/19 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 78,310.12 78,310.12 4/19 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 661.49 661.49 4/19 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 59.00 59.00 4/20 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 54,923.44 54,923.44 4/20 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 109,585.75 109,585.75 4/20 WIRE PAYMENT - Land Purchase 3,076,580.00 3,076,580.00 4/20 WIRE PAYMENT - Land Purchase 1,000.00 1,000.00 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,240.66 3,240.66 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 3,535.55 3,535.55 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 4,910.57 4,910.57 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 10,907.61 10,907.61 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 27,650.48 27,650.48 4/21 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 114,645.27 114,645.27 4/21 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 963.02 963.02 4/22 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 3,700.60 3,700.60 4/22 STATE DISBURSEMENT UNIT - Child Support Payments 1,732.50 1,732.50 4/22 WIRE PAYMENT - RCMU CAISO 275.41 275.41 4/22 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 282.87 282.87 4/26 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 1,740.00 1,740.00 4/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 135.75 135.75 4/27 CALPERS - City - Retirement Account Deposit 203.63 203.63 4/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 965.33 965.33 4/27 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 1,213.35 1,213.35 4/29 CALPERS - Fire - Retirement Account Deposit 186,904.77 186,904.77 4/29 WIRE PAYMENT - PARS SEC 115 700,000.00 700,000.00 4/29 WIRE PAYMENT - PARS SEC 115 300,000.00 300,000.00 4/29 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 12.00 12.00 4/29 Workers Comp - Fire Account Transfer 2,924.00 2,924.00 4/30 Workers Comp - City Account Transfer 58.38 58.38 TOTAL CITY 4,480,569.02 TOTAL FIRE 1,239,570.23 GRAND TOTAL 5,720,139.25 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Electronic Debit Register April 1, 2021 to April 30, 2021 1 Page 38 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $17,942.08 Dated April 26, 2021 Through May 23, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $16,459.74 and $1,482.34 for the City and the Fire District, respectively BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 39 Agenda Check Register RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. AND CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA 4/26/2021 through 5/23/2021 Check No.Check Date Vendor Name City Fire Amount ***AP 00417306 04/28/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 15,176.88 1,201.17 16,378.05 AP 00417307 04/28/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 1,282.86 0.00 1,282.86 AP 00417563 05/05/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 0.00 117.50 117.50 AP 00417834 05/19/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 0.00 163.67 163.67 $16,459.74 $17,942.08 $1,482.34 Note: Grand Total: Total Fire: Total City: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures 08:30:46 05/24/2021Current Date:VLOPEZ - Veronica Lopez Page:1 Time:CK_AGENDA_REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED - CK: Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout User: Report:Page 40 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Augie Barreda, Deputy Fire Chief Michelle Cowles, Management Analyst II SUBJECT:Consideration to Renew an Agreement with the County of San Bernardino for the 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021-22 and an Estimated Total Contract Amount of $737,400 over Five Years. (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Fire Board approve a renewal agreement between the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District and the County of San Bernardino for 800 MHz Radio Communications System Access/Paging and Equipment Maintenance Services for $147,480 in FY 2021-22 and an estimated total contract amount of $737,400 over five (5) years. BACKGROUND: The West End Communications Authority (WECA) was a joint powers agency established in 1991 to implement and administer a public safety trunked radio system used by the West End cities of Chino, Montclair, Ontario, Upland, and Rancho Cucamonga; as well as the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and the Cucamonga Valley Water District. In 2005, WECA approached the County for a proposal to provide a technology upgrade, ongoing maintenance, and support and administration of their 800 MHz radio system. Through a collaborative process, The County's Innovation and Technology Department (ITD) and WECA's executive board developed an operational model wherein WECA would provide the County with funds to purchase and install simulcast radio equipment and accessories for the WECA facilities upgrade. This Agreement, formalized in 2007, required WECA to transfer all their technological assets to the County. ITD was needed to operate and maintain the WECA system independently of the County's 800 MHz radio system for the duration of the five (5) year Agreement. Once the Agreement terminated, the two independent systems would be integrated into one County system. In 2013, at the end of the five-year term, WECA had the option to end services with the County and purchase back their portion of the 800 MHz radio system. If WECA decided to renew services, the cost of services would be provided to it at the current Board approved rate; if WECA declined, each member agency agreed to enter into separate five-year subscriber agreements at the current Board approved rate. In December 2019, the Fire District and San Bernardino County renewed Contract #FD19-020 for Page 41 Page 2 7 4 8 a 19-month term with an expiration date of June 30, 2021. ANALYSIS: The ITD operates and maintains the County's Public Safety Radio Communications System that provides the means by which dispatch centers, public safety locations, and mobile/portable radios communicate via voice transmission. This system is primarily for local government agency use and subsequently for additional governmental and related nongovernmental users to facilitate public safety. The County's Public Safety Radio Communications System is considered a vital piece of infrastructure used daily by Fire District personnel during emergency and nonemergency situations. Communications must always remain operable to maintain personnel safety and to relay information effectively. Staff recommends renewal of the Agreement with the County effective July 1, 2021. The Agreement will continue to renew annually for five (5) years thereafter, through June 30, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: The County has proposed an annual contract amount of $147,480 (226 radios per 12 months). This is a decrease of $11,720 from the existing FY 2020-21 contract of $159,200 (223 radios per 12 months). In anticipation of this Agreement, the District budgeted the following funds for FY 2021-22: Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 3281502-5300 Fire Fund Communications $73,740 3282502-5300 CFD 85-1 Communications $58,990 3283502-5300 CFD 88-1 Communications $14,750 The District also considers the possibility to rate changes for radio maintenance and service cost as stated in the Agreement and budgets accordingly. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This Agreement encompasses the Fire Board's core values of promoting a safe and healthy community for all, as well as working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. Maintaining effective communications between Fire District personnel, surrounding agencies, and dispatch centers ensures our responders have the resources necessary during any emergency or disaster. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - CON-Standard 800 MHz-RANCHO FIRE DISTRICT Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Release the Previously Submitted Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities and Monumentation Cash Deposit by Owens Ct. Estates, LLC, Related to Case No. SUBTT16578, Located on the West Side of East Avenue, South of Victoria Street and Approve a New Improvement Agreement, Improvement Securities, and Monumentation Cash Deposit, Submitted by Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Release the previous Improvement Agreement and Improvements Securities submitted by the previous developer, Owens Ct. Estates, LLC; 2. Approve an Improvement Agreement for public improvements related to Case No. SUBTT16578 and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said agreement; and 3. Accept cash securities to guarantee completion of the related public improvements. BACKGROUND: On August 20, 2014 City Council approved the final tract map, improvement agreement and securities for Case No. SUBTT16578, located on the west side of East Avenue, south of Victoria Street, for a subdivision of six single-family lots, submitted by Plaza Developments East Ave, LLC. On August 17, 2016 City Council approved the improvement agreement and securities submitted by Owen Ct. Estates, LLC and released the prior agreement and securities. Case No. SUBTT16578 was approved subject to a condition that certain public improvements be constructed including; sidewalk, A.C. pavement, curb and gutter, drive approaches, and street lights. ANALYSIS: In August of 2020, Staff was notified that Owen Ct. Estates, LLC no longer owns the project described as Case No. SUBTT16578. Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP, has taken over the construction of on-site and off-site improvements as conditioned in SUBTT16578. On-site improvements include the construction of six new homes which began in late 2017 and is nearly complete. Page 55 Page 2 7 4 9 Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP., has submitted an Improvement Agreement and Improvement securities to guarantee the construction of the public improvements. The developer submitted a bond estimate to properly reflect the remaining public improvements and submitted the following securities below: Faithful Performance Cash Bond No. $41,116 (Receipt No. 310558) Labor and Material Cash Bond No. $41,116 (Receipt No. 310558) Cash Deposit Monumentation: $2,938 (Receipt No. 310558) Approval of this item by the Council would approve the improvement agreement, accept the securities for the construction of certain public improvements with Blackstone Residential Operating Partnership, LP, and release the prior agreement and securities with Owens Ct. Estates, LLC. Copies of the agreement and securities signed by the developer are available in the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 56 ATTACHMENT 1 Vicinity Map SUBTT16578 NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 57 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Annette Cano-Soza, Assistant Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Accept Public Improvements on the South Side of 8th Street Between Hermosa Avenue and Archibald Avenue Located at 10013 8th Street, Related to Case No. DRC2017-00448, as Complete, File the Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Bonds. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the development of Case No. DRC2017-00448 and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion; 2. Release Faithful Performance Bond #4428157 and accept Maintenance Bond #4428157M for the associated public improvements; 3. Release the Labor and Material Bond #4428157 six months after Council approval; and 4. Authorize the City Engineer to approve the release of the Maintenance Bond one year following the filing of the Notice of Completion if the improvements remain free from defects in material and workmanship. BACKGROUND: Case No. DRC2017-00448 was approved by the Planning Commission on January 10, 2019 for the construction of a new storage facility on 3.81 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) district on the south side of 8th Street, west of Hermosa Avenue, located at 10013 8th Street. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on October 2, 2019, in order to ensure construction of the required public improvements. ANALYSIS: All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The public improvements will be re-inspected in approximately nine months to ensure they remain in good order prior to release of the maintenance bond. Prior to construction of the public improvements the developer, Biane Family Properties, submitted Faithful Performance Bond #4428157 in the amount of $5,900 to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements. With completion of the improvements this bond is no longer required, and the developer has submitted Maintenance Bond #4428157M to secure maintenance Page 58 Page 2 7 5 0 of the improvements through the one- year warranty period. FISCAL IMPACT: None COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Page 59 ATTACHMENT 1 1 1 3 6 Vicinity Map DRC2017-00448 NOT TO SCALE Project Site Page 60 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-043) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year memorandum of understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. BACKGROUND: The City Council previously approved a two-year memorandum of understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA), effective July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020. On December 16, 2020, the City Council approved a resolution imposing the terms set forth in the City’s last, best and final offer to RCCEA. In March 2021, the Mid-Management group petitioned to separate from the Rancho Cucamonga Employees Association to form their own bargaining unit called the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (RCMA). ANALYSIS: In March and April of 2021, the City and RCMA met and conferred in good faith. The parties negotiated a one-year memorandum of understanding with no salary increases in recognition of the economic impacts resulting from the pandemic. In addition, the parties agreed to eliminate language requiring 6 months of service before being able to use floating holidays and personal leave; implementation of automatic enrollment into deferred compensation at the amount equal to City match for new employees with an opt out provision; updates regarding constructive receipt language; increased administrative leave from 75 to 85 hours per fiscal year; and other minor clarifying adjustments. All new terms are effective the first full pay period in July 2021. RCMA voted to approve the negotiated terms in early May 2021. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the MOU between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association. Upon approval by the City Council, the MOU would be effective June 2, 2021 to June 30, 2022. Page 61 Page 2 7 5 2 FISCAL IMPACT: None. This MOU will not result in any additional costs to the City. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2021-043 Attachment 2 – Memorandum of Understanding Page 62 RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (RCMA) have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Memorandum of Understanding effective June 2, 2021 to June 30, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Memorandum of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 63 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION 2021 - 2022 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 64 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (RCMA) SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this MOU are effective upon City Council approval and shall continue for a twelve (12) month period, ending June 30, 2022. A. NEGOTIATIONS FOR SUCCESSOR MOU The City and RCMA agree that negotiations for the successor MOU will begin during the second full week in January 2022, which begins on Monday, January 10, 2022. The City and RCMA agree to meet and confer at least twice per month while negotiations are ongoing, unless both parties mutually agree to fewer meetings in a month. RCMA agrees to take Tentative Agreements reached at the table to their membership for a ratification by their members within 60 days or they expire. SECTION 2: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT There shall be no cost of living adjustment (0%) for the term of this agreement. SECTION 3: SALARY STRUCTURE All employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 10% (20 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. SECTION 4: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. SECTION 5: MANAGEMENT BENEFITS Employees designated as Management are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: A. Administrative Leave – Eighty-Five (85) hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor. B. Life Insurance – The City provides $50,000 base coverage of life insurance for bargaining unit employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the City’s group rate. Page 65 3 C. Deferred Compensation – Four percent (4%) of base salary. The City will match dollar for dollar up to $50 per month and 1% of monthly base salary per month in deferred compensation for any bargaining unit member who pays up to $50 and 1% of monthly base salary into deferred compensation through payroll deductions. Deferred Compensation participation for new bargaining unit members shall be automatic with an opt-out option. SECTION 6: HEALTH INSURANCE A.LEVEL OF BENEFIT The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all full time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit, subject to the limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed $1,175 per month. B.USE OF ACCRUED VACATION FOR ABOVE CITY-PAID CONTRIBUTION MAXIMUM HEALTH INSURANCE Employees who elect a health insurance program with a premium above the City- paid contribution maximum may also elect to use the cash value of redeemed accrued vacation to pay for any above maximum premium. Such use will be on a dollar-for dollar and pre-tax basis. Such election must be made in writing, may cover all or a specified part over the maximum premium, and be effective for one calendar year unless the participant terminates employment with the City during the year (see Appendix A for complete information on this optional benefit). If accrued vacation is insufficient to pay for any above maximum premium, the difference will be deducted from the employee’s net pay. This periodic payout will not be included in the computation of overtime and will not counts towards Vacation Buyback. The parties agree that this position will not be used when bargaining, contemplating, or calculating the health insurance benefit. C.CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT Represented employees who had waived coverage under a City-paid medical insurance plan and were receiving a cash in-lieu payment in the amount of $200 per month for single coverage or $300 per month for family coverage as of September 30, 2012, may continue to receive this cash in-lieu payment as long as they remain eligible. To be eligible, an employee must provide the following: (1) proof that the employee and all individuals for whom the employee intends to claim a personal exemption deduction for the taxable year or years that begin or end in or with the City’s plan year to which the opt out applies (“tax family”), have or will have minimum essential coverage through another source (other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) for the plan year to which the opt out arrangement applies (“opt out period”); and (2) the employee must sign an attestation that the employee and his/her tax family have or will have such minimum essential coverage for the opt out period. An employee must sign an attestation every plan year at open enrollment or within 30 days after Page 66 4 the start of the plan year. The opt-out payment cannot be made and the City will not in fact make payment if the employer knows that the employee or tax family member does not have such alternative coverage, or if conditions in this paragraph are not otherwise satisfied. No other represented employees shall be eligible for this benefit. Employees not receiving cash in-lieu as of September 30, 2012, may still waive coverage by providing the proof of insurance as noted above, but will not receive a cash in-lieu payment. D.AFFORDABLE CARE ACT REOPENER The Rancho Cucamonga Management Association or City may reopen negotiations on the issue of health insurance benefits to address changes to or the elimination of the ACA and in order to avoid penalties or taxes under the ACA or other statutory scheme that may result from an interpretation of the ACA or other statutory scheme by the Internal Revenue Service or other federal agency (including, but not limited to, a revenue ruling, regulation or other guidance) or state agency, or a ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction. These negotiations will not result in a reduction or increase in the amount the City provides for employee health coverage. SECTION 7: RETIREE MEDICAL Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally fund, without any City contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group health insurance available to the City's retirees. It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or can be made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if available, will remain available for any specific future period of time. If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s) terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or replacement insurance. All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree. The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to the retiree reimbursing the City not later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage. The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree, regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare. City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance carrier(s). It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates. Page 67 5 If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as and for premium reimbursement. SECTION 8: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA) The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) through the California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist employees with planning for future health care expenses. Employees are allowed a onetime election to opt into the plan. Represented employees shall be eligible to participate in the plan according to a schedule negotiated separately from this agreement. Contributions to the Plan shall be made as City contributions through a salary reduction arrangement. All contributions made on behalf of employees through such salary reduction arrangement are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS provisions. No Employer contributions are to be made to the plan. At the discretion of the applicable bargaining unit, contributions may be amended once per year provided that such amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan Document. SECTION 9: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 10: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit and elected officials. SECTION 11: FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 The City has established a flexible spending account plan managed by a third-party administrator that is open to voluntary participation of members in the bargaining unit. The City agrees to pick up all administrative fees associated with maintaining this program for bargaining unit members (including but not limited to debit card fees). SECTION 12: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE When a death occurs in the family of a full-time employee, the employee shall be granted up to 80 hours of bereavement leave with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, grandparents-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with employee. The City Manager or designee Page 68 6 shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner refer to registered domestic partner, as defined by California Family Code Section 297.) SECTION 13: PERSONAL LEAVE Employees can use up to 40 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave or holiday time as personal leave. These 40 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. SECTION 14: VACATION All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule. Length of Service in Years Hours Accrued Per Pay Period Annual Hours Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 9 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15+6.923 180 SECTION 15: VACATION CAP Vacation shall be capped at 1040 hours. Any hours accrued over 1040 hours will be cashed out using the options below: Cash Deferred compensation contributions as allowed by law The employees make an irrevocable decision before the end of the calendar year and the payment or distribution will occur in April. SECTION 16: VACATION BUYBACK Annually, any employee that wants to have the City buy back vacation hours shall make an irrevocable election to do so. The irrevocable election shall be submitted in writing to the City’s Human Resources Department on or before December 15 and shall indicate the number of hours of vacation that the employee expects to earn in the following calendar year that the employee wants the City to buy back, with a minimum buy back of 20 hours up to a maximum of 160 hours. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in June/July (between the last payday in June and the first payday in July) and December (between the first and second payday of the month), and the employee must indicate the total amount of hours they want paid out in June/July and in December. Regardless of the number of hours Page 69 7 requested to be cashed out at either time, the most the City can cash out is the number of hours accrued and available in that calendar year to date. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buyback time. SECTION 17: VACATION ACCRUAL City Manager may provide an accrual rate for new Management employees up to the equivalent of a five-year employee upon hire. This is important as many experienced candidates have significant time in public sector and otherwise might have to begin at a much lower accrual rate than they receive at their current agency. SECTION 18: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. Sick leave accrual (10 hours/month), begins on the first day of employment and can be taken after ninety (90) days of service. A. Personal Sick Leave Employees can use sick leave for personal illness, injury, a health-related reason (such as the diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventive care. B. Family Sick Leave Employees can use sick leave for the illness or injury of a health-related reason (such as the diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventive care of qualified family member. For the purpose of Family Sick Leave, a qualified member means the employee’s: child (includes any age or dependency status, or for whom the employee is a legal ward or stands in loco parentis), parent (includes person who stood in loco parentis of the employee as a child), parent-in-law, spouse, registered domestic partner, grandparent, grandparent-in-law, great-grandparent, great-grandparent-in-law, grandchild, great- grandchild, or sibling. C. Other Statutory Use Sick leave can be used to cover an absence for an employee who is victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking to: (a) Obtain or attempt to obtain a temporary restraining order or other court assistance to help ensure the health, safety, or welfare of the employee or their child(ren). (b) Obtain medical attention or psychological counseling; services from a shelter; program or crisis center; or participate in safety planning or other actions to increase safety. Page 70 8 D. Medical Certification In the event sick leave absences due to personal illness or injury, which exceeds three (3) consecutive workdays, the Department Head or Human Resources may require a physician’s statement indicating the employee’s fitness to return to work. Should the City suspect that there is an abuse of sick leave by an employee, the City may require that the employee submit to Human Resources a physician’s certification to support the absence. SECTION 19: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK Employees within the bargaining unit who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service can sell 120 hours back to the City. SECTION 20: HOLIDAYS The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (1) July 4 Independence Day (2) First Monday of September Labor Day (3) November 11 Veteran's Day (4) Fourth Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day (5) Day following Thanksgiving Floater (6) December 24 Day preceding Christmas (7) December 25 Christmas Day (8) January 1 New Year’s Day (9) Third Monday of January Martin Luther King's Birthday (10) Third Monday of February President’s Day (11) Last Monday of May Memorial Day (12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc.) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday, except as provided during a Holiday Closure pursuant to Section 38. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however, Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the Page 71 9 instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Year’s, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday. SECTION 21: HOLIDAY TIME The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: The ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and one-half abrogates the employee's right to that holiday. SECTION 22: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE City Facilities will observe a holiday closure beginning Thursday, December 23, 2021 through Friday, December 31, 2021. During the term of this MOU, there will be Holiday Facility Closures, certain City facilities may close in conjunction with the Christmas and New Year's holidays. Closure dates for City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services. The City will strive to provide a schedule of Holiday Facility Closures at least six months or more in advance of the closure. During a holiday closure, affected represented employees may take paid leave from holiday, management leave, compensatory time, vacation accruals, or use unpaid leave. When holiday closures are implemented by the City, Section 19's provision regarding consecutive holidays shall not apply. SECTION 23: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY The City shall provide employees within the bargaining unit up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child including the paid leave as outlined below; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code Section 12945), if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 24: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY Employees within the bargaining unit are granted up to 80 hours of natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child, however, use of the 80 paid hours does not extend any time charged under FMLA or CFRA. Any paid time required beyond this Page 72 10 initial 80 hours must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 25: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Any employee covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the difference between the disability payments received under Workers Compensation Act and the employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one-hour increments. SECTION 26: MILITARY LEAVE Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation, the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 27: MILITARY SERVICE BUY BACK Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 28: BILINGUAL PAY Bargaining Unit employees who qualify for bilingual pay will be provided such at $75.00 per month, Each Department Head will determine the number of employees needed to perform translation duties per department, subject to review and approval of the Deputy City Manager/ Administrative Services. Employees who receive bilingual pay are expected to perform translation services for their Department and for other City Services should the need arise. An updated list of the employees receiving bilingual pay will be provided every six-months or as changes occur. Bilingual duties will be distributed as equitable as possible. SECTION 29: RETIREMENT BENEFIT Unit members who do not meet the definition of “new member” under the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) (those unit members shall be referred to as "classic members") are enrolled in either the CalPERS retirement plan commonly Page 73 11 referred to as the 2.5% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 1" and "Tier 2"), or in the 2% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 3") and shall be provided the benefits as described below: A. Tier 1 – Employees Hired Before September 1, 2010 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays the normal eight percent (8%) CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution per Resolution 15- 090. 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay five percent (5%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay three percent (3%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. B. Tier 2 – Employees Hired Between September 1, 2010 and July 3, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays seven percent (7%) of the normal CalPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay four percent (4%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution and one percent (1%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 15-090. Page 74 12 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay five percent (5%) of the CalPERS member contribution, and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay three percent (3%) of the CalPERS member contribution, and employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect to reflect this change prior to the effective date. C. Tier 3 – Employees Hired on or After July 4, 2011 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays six percent (6%) of the normal CalPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay four percent (4%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution for a total of one percent (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution and four percent (4%) of the employer contribution per Resolution 15-090. 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay four percent (4%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay two percent (2%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. D.It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts A through C above shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of the employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation, and any Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC). Page 75 13 E.The City pays EPMC for the various "Tiers" as outlined above and reports the value of EPMC payments as special compensation. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1)(F) as Value of Employer-Paid Member Contributions. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CalPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. All employee payments of the employer share are done pursuant to Government Code Section 20516(f). There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Section 30. F.The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) -As it may from time to time exist, the PEPRA shall in its entirety be given full force and effect. Any provision in this MOU which contradicts any provision of the PEPRA shall be deemed null and void, with the contrary PEPRA provision(s) being given full force and effect. Therefore, no provision of PEPRA shall be deemed to impair any provision of this MOU or any MOU, Agreement, Rule or Regulation predating this MOU. PEPRA includes, but is not limited to, the provisions described below: Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code§ 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member'' is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. Unit members who are "new members" and miscellaneous employees on and after January 1, 2013, shall be enrolled in the 2%@ 62 retirement formula (Govt. Code§ 7522.20). Unit members who are "new members" on and after January 1, 2013, shall have "final compensation" measured by the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned by the member during a period of at least 36 consecutive months (Section 7522.32.), and their retirement benefits shall be calculated based on "pensionable compensation" (Section 7522.10) rather than "compensation earnable" (Section 20636). G.In addition, the City has adopted the PARS Retirement Enhancement Plan generally described as .5% (one-half percent) at 55 or at 60, depending upon the employee's hire date, for all miscellaneous employees hired on or prior to December 31, 2012. To be eligible, employees must be at least age 56, have ten Page 76 14 (10) years of full-time continuous service and retire from the City. This benefit will be paid to qualified retirees in addition to any CalPERS benefits to which they are entitled. H. Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) 1. Effective July 4, 2011: This benefit shall consist of paying 8% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 7% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 2063(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 6% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. Payment of EPMC and reporting the value of EPMC on compensation earnable is on pay rate and special compensation except special compensation delineated in Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) which is the monetary value of EPMC on compensation earnable. 2.Effective the first full pay period in January of 2019: This benefit shall consist of paying 5% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 5% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010 and before July 4, 2011. This benefit shall consist of paying 4% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. 3.Effective the first full pay period in January of 2020: This benefit shall consist of paying 3% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for Page 77 15 employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 3% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010 and before July 4, 2011. This benefit shall consist of paying 2% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. Payment of EPMC and reporting the value of EPMC on compensation earnable is on pay rate and special compensation except special compensation delineated in Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) which is the monetary value of EMPC on compensation earnable. SECTION 30: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COURSES Reimbursements by t he City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed two thousand three hundred dollars ($2,300.00) during any fiscal year. Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $2,300.00 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all the following conditions precedent exists: A.Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or university that is licensed/accredited by one of the six regional accreditors involved in higher education accreditation in the United States. B.The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of "C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C" or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received). C.Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1) those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has Page 78 16 declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major. D.Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s) for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regards shall be final. E.The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought. SECTION 31: ENCOURAGING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Promotions are movements to a different classification with a higher pay range. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to seek regular performance feedback from their direct supervisors and other Department leadership for professional development and in order to prepare to compete for future promotional opportunities. If a member applies for a promotion to a bargaining unit position and is not selected for an interview or has an interview but is not selected for the job, the employee is encouraged to request feedback from their supervisor as to reasons why they were not selected. The supervisor will work other Department personnel and/or Human Resources to provide a response to the requesting employee within 30 days of the request. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to register on the City’s employment portal to be informed of promotional opportunities by email, and to check their City email account regularly for information regarding promotional opportunities. SECTION 32: REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS AND RECERTIFICATIONS The City will pay for the cost of any required certifications or recertification required of employees to maintain their positions. Required certifications must be outlined in an employee’s classification specification. The Department Director, with the approval of the City Manager, can add to but not eliminate certifications and recertifications that Departments will cover the costs for employees to maintain. Any additions by the Department Head must be applied equally to all employees in that classification. SECTION 33: 4/10 WORK WEEK City Hall generally operates on a 4/10 work week, hours 7am to 6pm, Monday through Thursday. However, different work schedules consisting of various work hours and days Page 79 17 may be adopted by individual departments based on departmental need. Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times. SECTION 34: DIRECT DEPOSIT All new bargaining unit members are required to enroll in direct deposit. Vacation buy backs can be by paper check. SECTION 35: CARPOOL PROGRAM The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full-time regular employees. Participation is voluntary, and employees interested in participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is $2.60 per day for every day that the bargaining unit employee carpools. SECTION 36: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES The City will provide RCMA with a list of specific Confidential Employees whose positions are covered by the Management Employees' bargaining unit. These employees are designated as Confidential Employees due to the work they perform related to employer- employee relations and the access they have to information related to employer- employee relations. The City will update that list when a new confidential employee is hired, or the duties of a current confidential employee changes and they are no longer involved in employer employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City, may not represent employees in discipline or grievance procedures and may not provide information or participate in labor negotiation on behalf of RCMA. Confidential Employees may be employed in some of the following positions (this list is not exhaustive): Deputy Director of Finance Deputy Director of Human Resources Finance Manager Principal Accountant Revenue Manager Senior Executive Assistant SECTION 37: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS AND CITY EMAIL SYSTEM The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist, for RCMA notices. Such space will be no less than 18" x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a Bargaining Unit work or break area, the RCMA may, after receiving approval in writing Page 80 18 from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. RCMA may also distribute notices to covered employees through the City's email system. Bulletin boards and emails shall only be used for the following notices: Scheduled RCMA meetings, agenda and minutes. Information on RCMA elections and the results. Information regarding RCMA social, recreational, and related news bulletins. Reports of official business of RCMA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors. City equipment (including City computers, laptops, and tablets), materials, or supplies shall not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, defamatory, or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an authorized representative of RCMA. RCMA agrees to follow the City's E-Mail Policy when sending emails to City employees. RCMA understands that all electronic mail is not confidential, and that the city reserves the right to access and disclose all messages sent over its email system for any purpose in accordance with the City's E-Mail Policy. SECTION 38: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Officers and representatives of RCMA to confer with Bargaining Unit employees during working hours. Therefore, RCMA Labor Relations Representatives, Officers or representatives will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals. RCMA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations. The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. RCMA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with RCMA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. SECTION 39: NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION - AB119 City shall provide thirty (30) minutes at a mutually agreeable time during the employee onboarding process for a RCMA representative to meet with a new RCMA covered Page 81 19 employee and present benefits of being a member of the union. Onboarding of new employees occurs during the first working day at the start of a new pay period up to twenty-six (26) times per year. The City will provide a calendar before the start of a new year. The City will provide RCMA with at least 10 days-notice, or as soon as practicable, of onboarding of new RCMA covered employees. A RCMA representative will have up to 30 minutes of uninterrupted time to meet with new RCMA covered employees. Prior to meeting, or in no case later than the meeting time, the City will provide the name and job assignment of the new employee to the RCMA representative. The City will provide designated RCMA representatives with all available information about the employee as required under AB119 within 30 days of the employees start date and the City will provide information on all RCMA covered employees again as required by AB119 at least three (3) times per year. SECTION 40: USE OF CITY RESOURCES RCMA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the public, provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. RCMA may also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for RCMA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by RCMA from the appropriate management representative. RCMA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by RCMA. SECTION 41: ASSOCIATION RELEASE TIME When RCMA is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City business hours, a reasonable number of Officers or other representatives of the RCMA shall be allowed reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits. 1.Such Officers and representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2.Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with operating needs and work schedules. RCMA Officers or representatives shall be permitted, if requested by an RCMA represented employee to attend an employee counseling session, which could result in disciplinary action. Such officers or representatives shall also be permitted, if requested by the Association employee, to be present at an employee disciplinary session. 1.Such Officers or representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2.No more than one employee at a time shall be granted release time to represent one employee. Page 82 20 RCMA Officers or representatives of the Association shall be given reasonable time during work hours to investigate and process specified grievances or complaints arising out of the application of MOU or personnel rules, upon prior permission from their respective department head or division manager. During the term of the next MOU, RCMA Officers and representatives agree to track their Association release time via the payroll system. The City and RCMA agree to review this usage to determine if limits need to be incorporated into a subsequent MOU. SECTION 42: RELEASE FOR ALL HANDS MEETING RCMA shall be allowed four (4) ninety (90) minute periods of release time for all hands meetings per fiscal year, including travel time, during work hours. For the purposes of labor negotiations with the City additional meetings may be requested and may be granted by the Human Resources Director. SECTION 43: LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The City and RCMA agree to implement quarterly labor/management committee (LMC) meetings to discuss employee relations issues. The LMC will not be authorized to change the MOU or to settle any grievance. SECTION 44: PRIORITY OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association shall take precedent over the Personnel Rules adopted per Resolution 13-065. SECTION 45: ADOPTION OF MOU This memorandum between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association was adopted on June 2, 2020. Page 83 21 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Rancho Cucamonga Management Association: Date_______________ Date_______________ _________________________ _____________________________ John R. Gillison Katie Distelrath City Manager Deputy Director of Community Services _________________________ ______________________________ Lori Sassoon Noah Daniels Deputy City Manager Finance Manager _________________________ _______________________________ Robert Neiuber Albert Espinoza Human Resources Director Deputy Director of Public Works Page 84 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services / City Engineer Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering Services / Utilities SUBJECT:Consideration of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 Update. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU's) Wildfire Mitigation Plan – 2021 Update. BACKGROUND: On September 21, 2018, then Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill ("SB") 901 requiring that publicly owned utilities ("POUs") prepare and present a Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) to its Governing Board by January 1, 2020. On July 12, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill ("AB") 1054 and AB 111 into law, requiring POUs including the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) to submit their WMP to a newly formed California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board ("WSAB”). The WSAB will review the POU's WMP and produce advisory opinions on their content and sufficiency, as well as provide recommendations on mitigating wildfire risk. Lastly, all POUs were required to submit their WMP to the WSAB by July 1, 2020. On December 18, 2019, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved RCMU’s 2020 WMP and the approved WMP was filed and submitted to the WSAB on March 18, 2020. On December 9, 2020, the WSAB issued its first Guidance Advisory Opinion for Electric POUs, which included a list of 14 specific recommendations and guidelines for consideration by the POUs in their 2021 WMPs. ANALYSIS: The Wildfire Safety Advisory Board’s (WSAB’s) Guidance Advisory Opinion identified 14 specific recommendations that POUs were requested to address in their 2021 WMPs. As specified in Public Utilities Code § 8387(b)(1), each POU is required to perform a comprehensive revision to the POU’s WMP at least once every three years. However, because the WSAB’s Guidance Advisory Opinion was provided after RCMU’s initial 2020 WMP submission, RCMU decided that it would fully address each of the 14 recommendations in its 2021 WMP update. The attached updated 2021 WMP restates each of the WSAB recommendations in Section IX where RCMU provides one or more of the following responses: (1) a narrative response to the recommendation; (2) a cross reference to where in the RCMU’s WMP this topic is addressed; (3) describes why the recommendation is not applicable to RCMU; or (4) informs the WSAB of RCMU’s intent to address the recommendation at the point of its next comprehensive revision, occurring in either the 2022 or 2023 WMP. Page 85 Page 2 7 5 4 FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact in the approval of the RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2021 update. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item supports the City Council's Core Values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by developing and updating a comprehensive Wildfire Mitigation Plan for its Municipal Utility to meet the community's needs. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Wildfire Mitigation Plan – 2021 Update Page 86 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY’S WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN Risk Category: Low VERSION 1 .1 – FINAL Attachment 1 Page 87 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Policy Statement ............................................................................................................................. 1 B. Purpose of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan ........................................................................................ 1 C. Organization of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan ................................................................................ 1 D. Utility Facts and Information .......................................................................................................... 2 II. Objectives of the Wildfire Mitigation Plan ........................................................................................ 4 III. Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................................... 4 A. Utility Governance Structure ......................................................................................................... 4 B. Wildfire Prevention .......................................................................................................................... 4 C. Wildfire Response and Recovery .................................................................................................. 5 D. Standardized Emergency Management System ....................................................................... 5 IV. Wildfire Risks and Drivers associated with design, construction, operation, and maintenance .............................................................................................................................................. 7 A. Particular Risks and Risk Drivers Associated With Topographic and Climatological Risk Factors ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 B. Enterprisewide Safety Risks............................................................................................................. 7 V. Wildfire Preventative Strategies ......................................................................................................... 8 A. High fire threat district .................................................................................................................... 8 B. Design and Construction Standards ............................................................................................ 9 C. Vegetation Management ............................................................................................................. 9 D. Inspections ..................................................................................................................................... 10 E. Reclosing Policy ............................................................................................................................ 10 F. Deenergization .............................................................................................................................. 10 VI. Restoration of Service ................................................................................................................... 11 VII. Evaluating of the Plan .................................................................................................................. 12 A. Metrics and Assumptions for Measuring Plan Performance .................................................... 12 Metric 1: Fire Ignitions ........................................................................................................................ 12 Metric 2: Wires Down ......................................................................................................................... 12 B. Impact of Metrics on Plan ............................................................................................................ 12 C. Monitoring and Auditing the Plan ............................................................................................... 13 D. Identifying and correcting deficiencies in the Plan ................................................................. 13 E. Monitoring the effectiveness of inspections .............................................................................. 13 Page 88 VIII. Independent Auditor.................................................................................................................... 13 IX. WSAB Guidance Advisory Opinion Recommendations .......................................................... 13 A. Plan Structure ................................................................................................................................ 14 B. Customer Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 14 C. The Grid .......................................................................................................................................... 15 D. Risk Assessement ........................................................................................................................... 17 E. Situational Awareness Technology ............................................................................................. 18 F. Vegetation Management ........................................................................................................... 19 X. Cross Reference to Statutory Requirements .............................................................................. 13 Page 89 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 1 I. OVERVIEW A. POLICY STATEMENT The City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility’s (RCMU’s) overarching goal is to provide safe, reliable, clean and economic electric service to its local community. In order to meet this goal, RCMU constructs, maintains, and operates its underground electrical lines and equipment in a manner that minimizes the risk of catastrophic wildfire posed by its electrical lines and equipment. B. PURPOSE OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN RCMU’s entire electric supply system is located underground in conduit and vaults. Historically, undergrounded electric lines have not been associated with catastrophic wildfires. The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective mitigation measure to reduce the potential of power-line ignited wildfires. Based on a review of local conditions and historical fires, RCMU has determined that its electrical lines and equipment do not pose a significant risk of catastrophic wildfire. Despite this low risk, RCMU has taken appropriate actions to help its region prevent and respond to the increasing risk of devastating wildfires. In its role as a public agency, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Fire District) closely coordinates with other local safety and emergency officials to help protect against fires and respond to emergencies. In its role as a utility, RCMU follows all applicable design, construction, operation, and maintenance requirements that reduce safety risks associated with its electric system. This Wildfire Mitigation Plan describes the safety-related measures that RCMU follows to reduce its risk of causing wildfires. C. ORGANIZATION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN This Wildfire Mitigation Plan included the following elements: • Objectives of the plan • Roles and responsibilities for carrying out the plan • Identification of key wildfire risks and risk drivers • Description of wildfire prevention, mitigation, and response strategies and programs • Metrics for evaluating the performance of the plan and identifying areas for improvement • Review and validation of the plan • Timelines Page 90 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 2 D. UTILITY FACTS AND INFORMATION Utility Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Service Territory Size 4 square miles Owned Assets 31 circuit miles of Underground Electric Distribution 42 miles of Underground Fiber Optics Number of Customers Served 2,000 electric customer accounts Population Within Service Territory 6,000 people (est.) Customer Class Makeup Number of Accounts Share of Total Load (MWh) 59% Residential 40% Small/Medium Business 1% Commercial/Industrial 6% Residential 59% Small/Medium Business 35% Commercial/Industrial Service Territory Location/Topography 1 99% Urban 1% Shrub Service Territory Wildland Urban Interface2 (based on total area) 0% Wildland Urban Interface 0% Wildland Urban Intermix Percent of Service Territory in CPUC High Fire Threat Districts (based on total area) X Includes maps Tier 2: 0% Tier 3: 0% Prevailing Wind Directions & Speeds by Season The Santa Ana winds typically peaks in October and concludes in the Spring. Wind speed varies, but the wind directions are typically aligned in a northeast to southwest direction. Miles of Owned Lines Underground and/or Overhead Overhead Dist.: 0 miles Overhead Trans.: 0 miles Underground Dist.: 31 miles Underground Trans.: 0 miles Explanatory Note 1 - Methodology for measuring miles is based on RCMU’s final as-built distribution circuit maps. Percent of Owned Lines in CPUC High Fire Threat Districts Overhead Distribution Lines as % of Total Distribution System (Inside and Outside Service Territory) Tier 2: 0% Tier 3: 0% 1 This data shall be based on the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Multi-Source Vegetation Layer Map, depicting WHR13 Types (Wildlife Habitat Relationship classes grouped into 13 major land cover types) available at: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ec5d68d8114b1fb2bfbf4665989eb3. 2 This data shall be based on the definitions and maps maintained by the United States Department of Agriculture, as most recently assembled in The 2010 Wildland-Urban Interface of the Conterminous United States, available at https://www.fs.fed.us/nrs/pubs/rmap/rmap_nrs8.pdf. Page 91 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 3 Overhead Transmission Lines as % of Total Transmission System (Inside and Outside Service Territory) Tier 2: 0% Tier 3: 0% Explanatory Note 1 – RCMU does not own any overhead lines inside or outside its service territory. Customers have ever lost service due to an IOU PSPS event? ☐ Yes X No Customers have ever been notified of a potential loss of service to due to a forecasted IOU PSPS event? ☐ Yes X No Has developed protocols to pre-emptively shut off electricity in response to elevated wildfire risks? ☐ Yes X No Has previously pre- emptively shut off electricity in response to elevated wildfire risk? ☐ Yes X No If yes, then provide the following data for calendar year 2020: Number of shut-off events: 0 Customer Accounts that lost service for >10 minutes: 0 For prior response, average duration before service restored: N/A Page 92 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 4 II. OBJECTIVES OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN The primary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to describe RCMU’s existing programs, practices, and measures that effectively reduce the probability that RCMU’s electric supply system could be the origin or contributing source for the ignition of a wildfire. To support this goal, RCMU regularly evaluates the prudent and cost-effective improvements to its physical assets, operations, and training that can help reduce the risk of equipment-related fires. The secondary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to improve the resiliency of the electric grid. As part of the development of this plan, RCMU assesses new industry practices and technologies that will reduce the likelihood of an interruption (frequency) in service and improve the restoration (duration) of service. III. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. UTILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE B. WILDFIRE PREVENTION RCMU’s staff and contractor’s roles and responsibilities for (1) electric facility design, maintenance, and inspection; and (2) vegetation management. • Operate system in a manner that will minimize potential wildfire risks. • Take all reasonable and practicable actions to minimize the risk of a catastrophic wildfire caused by RCMU’s electric facilities. Rancho Cucamonga City Council City Manager Deputy City Manager - Comm. Development Director of Engineering Services / City Engineer Deputy Director of Engineering - Utilities (RCMU) Page 93 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 5 • Coordinate with federal, state, and local fire management personnel as necessary or appropriate to implement RCMU’s Wildfire Mitigation Plan. • Immediately report fires, pursuant to existing RCMU practices and the requirements of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan. • Take corrective action when the staff witnesses or is notified that fire protection measures have not been properly installed or maintained. Comply with relevant federal, state, and industry standard requirements, including the industry standards established by the California Public Utilities Commission. C. WILDFIRE R ESPONSE AND R ECOVERY For the City and the Fire District, relevant lines of communication during emergencies include Landline, cell phone, text messaging and radio. During emergency scenes: same as above, plus radio communication via the 800 and VHF radios. In addition, during emergencies we can activate our Auxiliary Communications Service (ham radio) team to assist with first responders and the EOC during a wildfire incident Regarding the utility’s staff roles regarding fire prevention, response and investigation, other than providing an agency representative during an emergency involving RCMU facilities there are no other roles needed since RCMU’s service area is outside of the wildfire threat area. D. STANDARDIZED E MERGENCY M ANAGEMENT S YSTEM As a local governmental agency,3 the City of Rancho Cucamonga has planning, communication, and coordination obligations pursuant to the California Office of Emergency Services’ Standardized Emergency Management System (“SEMS”) Regulations,4 adopted in accordance with Government Code section 8607. The SEMS Regulations specify roles, responsibilities, and structures of communications at five different levels: field response, local government, operational area, regional, and state.5 Pursuant to this structure, the City of 3 As defined in Cal. Gov. Code § 8680.2. 4 19 CCR § 2407. 5 Cal. Gov. Code § 2403(b): (1) “Field response level” commands emergency response personnel and resources to carry out tactical decisions and activities in direct response to an incident or threat. (2) “Local government level” manages and coordinates the overall emergency response and recovery activities within their jurisdiction. (3) “Operational area level” manages and/or coordinates information, resources, and priorities among local governments within the operational area and serves as the coordination and communication link between the local government level and the regional level. (4) “Regional level” manages and coordinates information and resources among operational areas within the mutual aid region designated pursuant to Government Code §8600 and between the operational areas and the state level. This level along with the state level coordinates overall state agency support for emergency response activities. Page 94 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 6 Rancho Cucamonga annually coordinates and communicates with the relevant safety agencies as well as other relevant local and state agencies. During emergencies, RCMU has a key role in ensuring utility operations at the field, local government and operational area levels. Under the SEMS structure, a significant amount of preparation is done through advanced planning at the local level, including the coordination of effort of public, private, and nonprofit organizations. San Bernardino serves as the Operational Area and is guided by the San Bernardino County Operational Area Coordinating Council that is made up of representatives of all 24 Cities and Town’s. The Operational Area includes local and regional organizations that bring relevant expertise to the wildfire prevention and recovery planning process. These participants include local school districts, utilities, first responder agencies, non-profits (such as the United Way and/or the American Red Cross), all regional Hospitals, special districts, communications providers, and other similar organizations. Pursuant to the SEMS structure, the City of Rancho Cucamonga also participates in annual emergency training exercises. In September of 2019, the Fire District hosted a table top exercise with all City Department Directors including RCMU on a wildfire in our front country area. At a minimum, exercises will be provided on an annual basis by either the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or by invitation from another supporting agency such as the County Operational Area. RCMU is a member of the California Utility Emergency Association, which is a State agency that plays a key role in ensuring communication and mutual aid between utilities during emergencies. (5) “State level” manages state resources in response to the emergency needs of the other levels, manages and coordinates mutual aid among the mutual aid regions and between the regional level and state level, and serves as the coordination and communication link with the federal disaster response system. Page 95 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 7 IV. WILDFIRE RISKS AND DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE A. PARTICULAR R ISKS AND R ISK D RIVERS A SSOCIATED W ITH T OPOGRAPHIC AND C LIMATOLOGICAL R ISK F ACTORS Within RCMU’s service territory and the surrounding areas, the primary risk drivers for wildfire are the following: • High Temperature • Low Humidity • Hillside Terrain • Fire Weather Conditions • Prolonged Drought • Climate Change • Fire History B. ENTERPRISEWIDE SAFETY RISKS Fire risks due to topographical and climatological factors are determined to be “Low” (Tier 1 (i.e. low risk)) within RCMU’s service area. The description of tiered fire threat zones is shown in Table 1 below. Table 1 Description of tiered fire threat zones Zone Category Description Tier 3 Extreme Wildland areas where exposure to overhead power lines, the availability of water resources, and emergency responder circulation routes affect response times to combat wildland fires. Tier 2 Elevated Elevated risk due to vegetation, high voltage regional transmission lines crossing the area, and adjacency to Tier 3 fire threat zones. Tier 1 Low Well developed areas, typically with underground high voltage circuitry. On September 19, 2018, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-103 which made a determination that RCMU's current service area is not located in an area that is considered an elevated or extreme risk of electric line wildfires; has 0 percent overhead electric lines and equipment and does not pose a significant risk of causing wildfires. Page 96 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 8 V. WILDFIRE PREVENTATIVE STRATEGIES A. HIGH FIRE THREAT DISTRICT RCMU, as a member of the California Municipal Utilities Association participated in the development of the CPUC’s Fire-Threat Map,6 which designates a High-Fire Threat District. In the CPUC Fire-Threat map development process, RCMU coordinated with Southern California Edison Company (SCE) and determined that because RCMU’s system is entirely undergrounded, that SCE would serve as territory lead for the region served by RCMU. RCMU has incorporated the High Fire Threat District into its construction, inspection, maintenance, repair, and clearance practices, where applicable. CPUC’s Fire Threat Map Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, acting as the Board of Directors of the Fire District also adopted a Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area Map for the City (see the map below), referring to the zone where undeveloped, wildland vegetation transitions to developed land such as residential neighborhoods which are at risk of wildfires. 6 Adopted by CPUC Decision 17-12-024. Page 97 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 9 Rancho Cucamonga Fire District’s Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area Map with RCMU Electrical Circuits The Fire District’s fire area map matches closely to the CPUC’s Fire-Threat Map and the existing RCMU underground electrical circuits (shown in purple) are all located in the low-risk category. B. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS RCMU’s electric facilities are designed and constructed to meet or exceed the relevant federal, state, or industry standard. RCMU treats CPUC General Orders (GO) 128 as a key industry standard for design and construction standards for underground electrical facilities. RCMU meets or exceeds all standards in GO 128. Additionally, RCMU monitors and follows, as appropriate, the National Electric Safety Code. C. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, so the standard vegetation management practices do not apply to RCMU Page 98 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 10 D. INSPECTIONS RCMU meets or exceeds the minimum inspection requirements provided in the CPUC’s GO 165 (Inspection Requirements for Electric Distribution Facilities) by annually patrolling all pad mounted Transformers, Switches and Capacitors, with a detailed inspection every 5 years. Pursuant to these rules, utilities inspect electric facilities in the High Fire Threat District more frequently than the other areas of its service territory. As described above, RCMU currently does not have any overhead powerlines located within or near the High-Fire Threat District within the CPUC’s Fire Threat Map. However, RCMU staff uses their knowledge of the specific environmental and geographical conditions of RCMU’s service territory to determine if any particular areas require more frequent inspections if necessary. If RCMU staff discovers a facility in need of repair that is owned by an entity other than RCMU, RCMU will issue a notice to repair to the facility owner and work to ensure that necessary repairs are completed promptly. E. RECLOSING POLICY RCMU does not have any automatic reclosers deployed downstream of RCMU’s Arbors substation. All of RCMU’s circuit breakers have reclosing functionality which is conducted manually by a lineman in the field. RCMU’s system currently does not have this capability to be controlled by SCADA or other remote controls. RCMU has the capability, should it be deemed necessary, to change the relay or reclosing settings during adverse conditions. F. DEENERGIZATION RCMU has the authority to preemptively shut off power due to fire-threat conditions, however, this option will only be used in extraordinary emergency circumstances. Due to the minimal risk of RCMU’s electrical supply facilities causing a power-line ignited wildfire, RCMU is not adopting specific protocols for de-energizing any portions of its electric distribution system. RCMU will re- evaluate this determination in future updates to this Wildfire Mitigation Plan. Page 99 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 11 VI. RESTORATION OF SERVICE In the unlikely event of a wildfire or other emergency event caused by or affecting RCMU’s electric system, that would require a public safety power shutoff, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will maintain a proactive plan to communicate with the community during high fire threat periods and disasters. • Coordinate with the Fire District and the Rancho Cucamonga Police through the City’s EOC during emergencies or large-scale outages. • Expand social media for the public to see current outages and estimated restoration times in coordination with the City’s Communications Team. • Communication plans through the City’s EOC will allow RCMU to coordinate with applicable emergency service personnel along with maintaining open lines of communication with customers, media and internal City staff. RCMU will work as quickly as possible to restore power safely, following an event, in cooperation with the City’s Fire District, Police, and Public Works Departments. RCMU will also engage its on- call high voltage contractors as-needed. RCMU staff and its contractors will ensure which circuits are to be brought up safely and that any vital loads are restored first followed by non-vital loads. In most cases, the following restoration priorities will be followed depending on the specific incident and available resources: • Public safety in the affected areas • Worker safety in performing the restoration work • Life-support or critical customers • Critical infrastructure (Key City facilities, City Police and Fire Departments, other key utility facilities (e.g., fiber communications) • Major commercial activities/accounts critical to continuity of community services (e.g., gas stations, food stores, home supply stores, repair shops, eateries and lodging facilities, financial institutions, etc.) • To reduce the total number of customers affected • To reduce the length of time customers have been without power. In directing restoration efforts to best achieve the above priorities, RCMU Staff will generally find it most efficient to dedicate restoration resources to the following types of facilities in the following order of priority to optimally restore electric services: • Arbors Substation located on Rochester Ave and Stadium Way • All Distribution circuits (12 kV) • Distribution feeders • Distribution transformers • Service lines Page 100 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 12 VII. EVALUATING OF THE PLAN A. METRICS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR MEASURING PLAN PERFORMANCE RCMU will track two metrics to measure the performance of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan: (1) number of fire ignitions; and (2) wires down causing fires within the service territory. METRIC 1: FIRE IGNITIONS For purposes of this metric, a fire ignition is defined as follows: • RCMU facility was associated with the fire • The fire was self-propagating and of a material other than electrical and/or communication facilities • The resulting fire traveled greater than one linear meter from the ignition point; and • RCMU has knowledge that the fire occurred In future Wildfire Mitigation Plans, RCMU will provide the number of fires that occurred that were less than 10 acres in size. Any fires greater than 10 acres will be individually described. METRIC 2: WIRES DOWN The second metric is the number of distribution and transmission wires downed within RCMU’s service territory. For purposes of this metric, a “wires down” event includes any instance where an electric transmission or primary distribution conductor falls to the ground or on to a foreign object. RCMU will divide the wires down metric between wires down inside and outside of the High Fire Threat District. RCMU will not normalize this metric by excluding unusual events, such as severe storms. Instead, RCMU will supplement this metric with a qualitative description of any such unusual events. B. IMPACT OF METRICS ON PLAN RCMU Performance Metrics: Metric 1: Fire Ignitions CY 2020 # of Fire Ignition in RCMU Service Area 0 # of wildfires in City boundaries NOT in RCMU Service Area (<10 acres) 1 (~2 acres) # of wildfires in City boundaries NOT in RCMU Service Area (> 10 acres) 0 Metric 2: Wires Down # of “Wires Down” events in RCMU Service Area 0 # of Red Flag warnings issued 9 Page 101 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 13 C. MONITORING AND AUDITING THE PLAN This Wildfire Mitigation Plan will be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and RCMU staff will present updates to this plan on an annual basis. Additionally, a qualified independent evaluator will review this plan and determine its compliance to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council. D. IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLAN Based on the recommendations of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, RCMU will correct any identified deficiencies. E. MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INSPECTIONS A key mitigation measure against wildfires is vegetation management. Since RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, the standard vegetation management inspections do not apply to RCMU. VIII. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR Public Utilities Code section 8387(c) requires RCMU to contract with a qualified independent evaluator with experience in assessing the safe operation of electrical infrastructure to review and assess the comprehensiveness of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan. The independent evaluator must issue a report that is posted to the City’s website. This report must also be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council at a public meeting. In evaluating and selecting an independent evaluator as required in PUC Section 8387(c), the City determined that the Fire District is the most qualified independent evaluator who understand the local conditions and fire risks for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is aware that RCMU’s service area is located in a low-risk fire threat zone with 100% underground electric wire equipment. The City believes that the Fire District is qualified to review the comprehensiveness of the RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan. I X . WSAB GUIDANCE ADVISORY OPINION RECOMMENDATIONS (2021 UPDATE) On December 9, 2020, the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB) issued its Guidance Advisory Opinion identifying 14 specific recommendations that Publicly Owned Utilities (POUs) are requested to address in their 2021 WMPs. As specified in Public Utilities Code § 8387(b)(1), each POU is required to perform a comprehensive revision to the POU’s WMP at least once every three years. Pursuant to this guidance, the RCMU will be updating their WMPs based on the direction of their local governing boards within this 3-year cycle. However, because the WSAB’s recommendations was provided after the RCMU’s initial WMP submission, RCMU decided that it would fully address each of the WASB’s recommendation in its 2021 WMP update. This Section IX. restates each of the WSAB recommendations where RCMU provides one or more of the Page 102 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 14 following responses: (1) provide a narrative response to the recommendation; (2) provide a cross reference to where in the POU’s WMP this topic is addressed; (3) describe why the recommendation is not applicable to the POU; or (4) inform the WSAB of the POU’s intent to address the recommendation at the point of the POU’s next comprehensive revision, occurring in either the 2022 or 2023 WMP. A. Plan Structure WSAB Recommendation #1: Provide context-setting information about the POU and provide a simple guide to where the statutory requirements are addressed within the WMP. RCMU’s Response: See Section I-D and Section X. WSAB Recommendation #2: Provide a short description of the POU’s public review and approval (if required) for the WMP. This description may also include a brief explanation of the funding mechanisms for wildfire mitigation efforts. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s public review of its WMP, updates and any associated approvals will be made available for public review on the City Council’s agenda located on the City’s website, as well as the City’s Council agenda posting located for viewing at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. WSAB Recommendation #3: Identify where the POU has posted the most recent Independent Evaluator (IE) Report and if your POU plans to enhance future IE reports, please summarize in what ways. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s most recent IE Report and existing WMP are included in RCMU’s website located at https://www.cityofrc.us/rcmu . No discussion has occurred on whether or not any enhancements to future IE reports will be needed. WSAB Recommendation #4: Develop, in collaboration with POU industry associations, WMP guidelines for future WMPs, understanding that it may take multiple cycles for POUs to integrate these recommendations into the WMPs. RCMU’s Response: This document is intended to include, as appropriate, RCMU’s responses to the recommendations in the WSAB’s Guidance Advisory Opinion for its 2021 WMP update. This document also represents the combined effort of the POU industry associations to further the development of a template to respond to the WSAB’s Guidance Advisory Opinion in future reporting WMP cycles. B. Customer Impacts WSAB Recommendation #5: Describe the potential impact investor-owned utilities (IOU) public safety power shutoff (PSPS) events could have on POU customers and how the POU manages these impacts. For POUs that are also balancing authorities, describe the criteria for wildfire Page 103 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 15 related de-energizations. Responses shall only provide aggregated information that does not provide customer-specific information or other potentially sensitive data. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s relationship with SCE during PSPS events is only at the Transmission and Sub-Transmission levels. It is important to note that SCE provides electricity to almost 85% of the City. For those residents, the City receives advanced email notifications that SCE will be exploring a possible PSPS event or has begun PSPS events at the Distribution circuit level. Any SCE PSPS outages occurring at the Distribution level will still affect a large majority of City residents and businesses served by SCE, but not RCMU powered customers or businesses. RCMU’s customers will only be impacted by the PSPS events ordered by SCE, if the SCE Transmission and Sub-Transmission level lines are ordered to be de-energized. To date, SCE has informed RCMU that it does not intend to de-energize any of its Transmission and Sub-Transmission circuits, therefore, RCMU has not implemented a mitigation strategy for SCE’s PSPS, nor have we deenergized our own lines when a wildfire threat is looming. RCMU also does not have a distribution level generator allowing the utility to withstand a SCE Transmission and Sub-Transmission PSPS event should that ever occur. WSAB Recommendation #6: Describe the utility customer communication plans with respect to wildfires and PSPS, and in particular describe the methods, content and timing used to communicate with the most vulnerable customers, such as Access and Functional Needs (AFN) customers, medical baseline customers, non-English speakers, and those at risk of losing water or telecommunications service. RCMU’s Response: RCMU relies on the City’s Communication Team to help disseminate key information including any outage information, wildfire and PSPS information to all City residents and the general public. This is done via the City’s social media channels including Facebook, Twitter and Nextdoor. For the communication to the City’s most vulnerable customers, this is an area that the City’s Communication Team is currently working on improving by creating a Community Engagement Policy that ensures citywide implementation of equitable community engagement practices. This recommendation will be better addressed at RCMU’s next comprehensive revision. C. The Grid WSAB Recommendation #7: Provide details on each POU’s system hardening and grid design programs, including: (1) the goals of the programs and the risk any particular program is designed to mitigate; (2) approach to PSPS mitigation and prevention; and (3) identify any resource shortages. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s approach to grid hardening is discussed in Section V. subsections B, D and E of RCMU’s WMP. RCMU’s 100% underground design and construction standards and field inspections of critical electrical equipment are some of its key grid hardening programs. Historically, undergrounded electric lines have not been Page 104 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 16 associated with catastrophic wildfires. The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective grid hardening measure that reduces the potential of power-line ignited wildfires. The goal of RCMU’s program is prevention and mitigation response versus reaction in its system hardening and grid design. RCMU is also providing the following responses to specific questions included in the WSAB’s 2021 Guidance Advisory Opinion under this sub-section: • Does the POU perform a circuit-by-circuit analysis to identify essential facilities (and whether they have backup power) like hospitals, communication centers, and community resource centers? RCMU’s Response: Yes, RCMU does have a circuit by circuit analysis which identifies essential facilities within its service area. The analysis does not identify whether those facilities have their own backup power. • Does the POU assess system hardening measures that could be installed to prevent PSPS for those facilities? RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU’s system is already designed to be 100% underground. • In what way does the POU prepare these facilities for a PSPS or another wildfire related de-energization event? RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU is not affected by the IOU’s PSPS de-energization event and its facilities are not located in a wildfire area. • For POUs that power water utilities or supply water themselves, if that water is used for drinking and firefighting, are certain projects being undertaken to harden the system for water delivery purposes? RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU does not serve sites that power any water utilities or water conveyance. • Are pump stations self-contained or have some level of fire protection? Is the supply to sewage treatment plants hardened? RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU does not serve any pump stations or sewage treatment plants. • Is supplemental generation available such as backup batteries or backup power facilities? RCMU’s Response: No, RCMU does not provide supplemental generation. • Are the majority installed by the customers themselves or the utility? RCMU’s Response: Unknown: If any supplemental generation is installed, it is done by the customers and not installed by the utility. • Can the utility open and close taps? Can the utility back-feed? RCMU’s Response: No, RCMU cannot control the taps of the customer’s backup / supplemental generation. Page 105 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 17 • Are there wildfire related circumstances wherein either of these tactics would be useful? RCMU’s Response: N/A • Can the utility sectionalize in a localized fashion? RCMU’s Response: N/A WSAB Recommendation #8: Describe annual visual patrols on potentially impacted circuits and the risks the POU is inspecting for. Describe whether and how system inspections lead to system improvements. Describe line patrols before, during, and/or after a critical fire weather event, such as a Red Flag Warning with strong winds, or following a fire that burned in areas where electric facilities are or could have been impacted. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s inspection standard is described in Section V-D of the WMP. WSAB Recommendation #9: Describe options considered by POU (including through the joint efforts of the POU associations) to identify previously unidentified risks that could lead to catastrophic wildfires. RCMU’s Response: RCMU continues to be actively involved in the California Municipal Utilities Association’s (CMUA’s) Wildfire Preparedness and Response Working Group to help identify any unidentified risks. This fall, the Working Group will be focused on risk drivers for powerline caused catastrophic wildfires and innovative mitigation options. CMUA plans to invite a broad range of utility staff, state agency staff (including the WSAB), industry experts, and academics to participate in this discussion. As part of this meeting, the Working Group will discuss unidentified wildfire risk drivers and mitigation measures that could address these risks. Based on the input provided during this meeting, CMUA will produce a publicly available, post-meeting report that summarizes the group’s conclusions and recommendations. RCMU’s staff will participate in CMUA’s meeting and will discuss any changes that RCMU has made to its operations in response to the conclusions and recommendations of the Working Group in a future WMP. Additionally, RCMU will continue to actively communicate with its Fire District staff to review any wildfire risks and risks drivers identified in Section IV-B in its WMP. D. Risk Assessment WSAB Recommendation #10: Describe the particular wildfire risks associated with system design and construction such as topography and location near the HFTD areas of another utility’s service territory. Describe any G.O. 95 exempt assets and possible updates to G.O. 95 that could facilitate more resilient utility transmission and distribution assets. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s assessment of wildfire risk is discussed in Section IV of RCMU’s WMP. As discussed in its WMP, RCMU has a 100% underground system, so the CPUC’s G.O. 95 overhead constructions standards do not apply. The following provides Page 106 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 18 responses to specific questions included in the WSAB’s 2021 WSAB Guidance Advisory Opinion under this sub-section: • Are there design or construction issues related to the utility’s specific topography or geographic location that the Board should be aware of? RCMU’s Response: N/A: No new information to provide. • How will the utility address risks associated with facilities requiring power that abut a Tier 2 or Tier 3 HFTD? RCMU’s Response: N/A: No RCMU facilities abut Tier 2 or Tier 3 HFTD. • How does the utility assess its risks associated with system design and construction? RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s design and construction standard continues to be a 100% underground system, which significantly lowers all wildfire risks. • What design and construction standards has the POU implemented that go beyond G.O. 95 or other General Order standards related to design and construction? RCMU’s Response: N/A; As previously stated, G.O. 95 does not apply to RCMU. E. SITUATIONAL AWARENESS TECHNOLOGY WSAB Recommendation #11: Provide context-setting information about the prevailing wind directions and speeds, differentiated by season, along with average weather conditions by season. Describe how and why situational awareness technology is installed, and where on the system. Describe the decision-making process regarding the installation of situational awareness technology, including constraints such as budgets, availability of equipment, knowledge to effectively deploy, or qualified personnel to install and monitor effectively. Identify any other agencies, utilities, or fire professionals that the data from these devices is shared with. RCMU’s Response: RCMU does not have any real-time wind direction and weather condition technology equipment installed that is able to track this information being requested by the WSAB. The lack of funds and budget to sustain staffing and qualified professionals to monitor this data is challenging in that neither the utility or other City Departments have the additional time or resources to track and monitor this information. However, the Emergency Management Division within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District does receive consistent briefing reports from the National Weather Service (NWS) San Diego Office, which covers our City and County. This briefing provides an overview of significant weather that may impact our area. These reports allow our team to increase our awareness and preparedness for upcoming events. If an event has the potential for severe implications including wind and weather conditions, NWS – San Diego will host conference calls leading up to the event so the affected jurisdictions can gather additional data in order to make critical decisions on how to manage any potential damage and disruption in services. Emergency Management will coordinate this information with our internal city stakeholders such as RCMU so collectively decisions Page 107 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 19 can be made to preserve safety for our residents, especially during the high Santa Ana wind season. F. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT WSAB Recommendation #12: Describe treatment plans for all types of vegetation associated with utility infrastructure, from the ground to the sky, which includes vegetation above and below electrical lines. RCMU’s Response: RCMU’s vegetation management program is discussed in Section V-C of RCMU’s WMP, basically summarizing that RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, so the standard vegetation management practices do not apply to RCMU. The following provides responses to specific questions included in the WSAB’s 2021 WSAB Guidance Advisory Opinion under this sub-section: • Describe the reasoning behind each treatment plan and the ecological impact of the treatment options chosen. RCMU’s Response: N/A • Describe how vegetation management in the HFTD or Fire Threat Zones differs from other areas, including within private property and urban landscaping. RCMU’s Response: N/A • Describe any enhanced vegetation management that goes beyond the minimum G.O. 95 standard. RCMU’s Response: N/A • A list of native and non-native species in the POU’s Service Territory and describe how treatment methods vary. RCMU’s Response: N/A • Describe how the POU tracks new vegetation growth that occurs in areas that has previously been cleared or treated. RCMU’s Response: N/A WSAB Recommendation #13: List the qualifications of any experts relied upon, such as scientific experts in ecology, fire ecology, fire behavior, geology, and meteorology. Specify the level of expertise of the POU staff that manages the contractors performing vegetation management. Describe measures each POU takes to ensure that POU staff and contractors comply with or verify compliance with Cal/OSHA standards on Minimum Approach Distances (MAD). RCMU’s Response: N/A: RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, so the standard vegetation management practices do not apply to RCMU. WSAB Recommendation #14: Describe whether the POU has considered innovative and alternative approaches to vegetation management. Page 108 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 20 RCMU’s Response: N/A: RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, so the standard vegetation management practices do not apply to RCMU. X . CROSS REFE RENCE TO STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS WSAB requested that RCMU provide a clear roadmap as to where each statutory requirement is addressed within RCMU’s WMP. Table 2: Cross References to Statutory Requirements Requirement Statutory Language Location in WMP Persons Responsible PUC § 8387(b)(2)(A): An accounting of the responsibilities of persons responsible for executing the plan. Section III A Objectives of the Plan PUC § 8387(b)(2)(B): The objectives of the wildfire mitigation plan. Section II Preventive Strategies PUC § 8387(b)(2)(C): A description of the preventive strategies and programs to be adopted by the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative to minimize the risk of its electrical lines and equipment causing catastrophic wildfires, including consideration of dynamic climate change risks. Section IIIB Evaluation Metrics PUC § 8387(b)(2)(D): A description of the metrics the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative plans to use to evaluate the wildfire mitigation plan’s performance and the assumptions that underlie the use of those metrics. Section VII Impact of Metrics PUC § 8387(b)(2)(E): A discussion of how the application of previously identified metrics to previous wildfire mitigation plan performances has informed the wildfire mitigation plan. Section VII Deenergization Protocols PUC § 8387(b)(2)(F): Protocols for disabling reclosers and deenergizing portions of the electrical distribution system that consider the associated impacts on public safety, as well as protocols related to mitigating the public safety impacts of those protocols, including impacts on critical first responders and on health and communication infrastructure. Section V.F Customer Notification Procedures PUC § 8387(b)(2)(G): Appropriate and feasible procedures for notifying a customer who may be impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines. The procedures shall consider the need to notify, as a priority, critical first responders, health care facilities, and operators of telecommunications infrastructure. Section VI. Section IX.B Vegetation Management PUC § 8387(b)(2)(H): Plans for vegetation management. Section V.C Inspections PUC § 8387(b)(2)(I): Plans for inspections of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s electrical infrastructure. Section V.D Page 109 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 21 Prioritization of Wildfire Risks PUC § 8387(b)(2)(J): A list that identifies, describes, and prioritizes all wildfire risks, and drivers for those risks, throughout the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory. The list shall include, but not be limited to, both of the following: (i) Risks and risk drivers associated with design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s equipment and facilities. (ii) Particular risks and risk drivers associated with topographic and climatological risk factors throughout the different parts of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory. Section IV.A CPUC Fire Threat Map Adjustments PUC § 8387(b)(2)(K): Identification of any geographic area in the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory that is a higher wildfire threat than is identified in a commission fire threat map, and identification of where the commission should expand a high fire threat district based on new information or changes to the environment. Section V.A Enterprise wide Risks PUC § 8387(b)(2)(L): A methodology for identifying and presenting enterprise wide safety risk and wildfire-related risk. Section IV.B Restoration of Service PUC § 8387(b)(2)(M): A statement of how the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative will restore service after a wildfire. Section VI Monitor and Audit PUC § 8387(b)(2)(N): A description of the processes and procedures the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall use to do all of the following (i) Monitor and audit the implementation of the wildfire mitigation plan. (ii) Identify any deficiencies in the wildfire mitigation plan or in its implementation and correct those deficiencies. (iii) Monitor and audit the effectiveness of electrical line and equipment inspections, including inspections performed by contractors, that are carried out under the plan, other applicable statutes, or commission rules. Section VII.C Page 110 RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan Version 1.1 June 2, 2021 22 Qualified Independent Evaluator PUC § 8387(c): The local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall contract with a qualified independent evaluator with experience in assessing the safe operation of electrical infrastructure to review and assess the comprehensiveness of its wildfire mitigation plan. The independent evaluator shall issue a report that shall be made available on the Internet Web site of the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative, and shall present the report at a public meeting of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s governing board. Section VIII REVISION HISTORY VERSION REVISED BY APPROVAL DATE SECTION(S) REVISED 1.0 N/A Dec. 18, 2019 NEW 1.1 F. LYN Jun. 2, 2021 I-D, VII-B, IX, X Page 111 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Robert Neiuber, Human Resources Director Lucy Alvarez-Nunez, Management Analyst SUBJECT:Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Approving a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-044) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a one-year memorandum of understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. BACKGROUND: The City Council previously approved a two-year memorandum of understanding between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA), effective July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2020. On December 16, 2020, the City Council approved a resolution imposing the terms set forth in the City’s last, best and final offer to RCCEA. Until recently, RCCEA consisted of three employee groups including Mid Managers, Supervisory Professionals, and General Employees. In March 2021, the Mid Management group petitioned to separate from RCCEA to form their own bargaining unit called the Rancho Cucamonga Management Association (RCMA). As a result, RCCEA now consists of Supervisory Professional and General Employee groups. ANALYSIS: Beginning January 2021, the City and RCCEA met and conferred in good faith. In May 2021, the parties negotiated a one-year memorandum of understanding including the following provisions: An increase in salary to two positions that are 10% or greater out of market when looking at the salary only results of the 2020 RCCEA salary survey to bring them up to 10% below market. The Animal Services Supervisor was shown to be 21.98% below market and will receive a 12% increase to bring the position 10% below market. The Human Resources Technician was shown to be 14.26% below market and will receive a 4.5% increase to bring the position to 10% below market. Elimination of language requiring 6 months of service before being able to use a floating holiday and personal leave. Implementation of automatic enrollment into deferred compensation for new employees Page 112 Page 2 7 5 3 capped at $50 per month with an opt-out provision. Modification of shoe allowance to permit the purchase of shoes or accessories. Modification of constructive receipt language to have buy back occur twice annually, in June and in November. Other clarifying modifications. In addition, the parties agreed to a conditional 1.5% COLA along with a 1% decrease to EPMC paid by the City for all Tier I, II, and III CalPERS classic members, both starting the first full pay period in May 2022, if all of the following provisions are met: The third and fourth quarters of CY 2021 include additional sales tax of at least 5% greater (after adjustments for overpayment, mistakes, or other similar items) than the same two quarters in CY 2019. The third and fourth quarters of CY 2021include Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) that is at least equal to the same two quarters in CY 2019. The first quarter of CY 2022 includes TOT that is at least equal to the first quarter of 2020. Staff recommends the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving the MOU between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association. Upon approval by the City Council, the MOU would be effective June 7, 2021 to June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for moving the two positions that are greater than 10% out of market to 10% below market is $28,000 for FY 21-22. The cost of the conditional COLA increase and reduction in EPMC is $29,100 for May and June of FY 21-22. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the Council’s core value of working together cooperatively ad respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2021-044 Attachment 2 – Memorandum of Understanding Page 113 RESOLUTION NO. 21- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. WHEREAS, representatives of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) have met and conferred pursuant to the provisions of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (California Government Code §3500, et seq.) with regard to terms and conditions of employment; and WHEREAS, representatives of the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association have agreed upon and presented to this City Council a Memorandum of Understanding effective June 7, 2021, to June 30, 2022. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES that said Memorandum of Understanding with the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association is hereby approved and the City Manager is hereby authorized to sign said Memorandum of Understanding on behalf of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, and the City Clerk to attest thereto. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. ATTACHMENT 1 Page 114 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION REPRESENTING THE SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES BARGAINING UNITS 2021 - 2022 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 115 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) BETWEEN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (RCCEA) SECTION 1: EFFECTIVE DATE The provisions of this MOU are effective June 7, 2021 and shall continue for a Twelve (12) month period, ending June 30, 2022. A. NEGOTIATIONS FOR SUCCESSOR MOU The City and RCCEA agree that negotiations for the successor MOU will begin during the second full week in January 2022, which begins on Monday, January 10, 2022. The City and RCCEA agree to meet and confer at least twice per month while negotiations are ongoing, unless both parties mutually agree to fewer meetings in a month. RCCEA agrees to take Tentative Agreements reached at the table to their membership for a ratification by their members within 60 days or they expire. SECTION 2: COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT There shall be no cost of living adjustment (0%) for the term of this agreement. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, employees in the following positions that are 10% or greater out of market, when looking at the salary only results of the 2020 RCCEA Salary Survey, will receive an increase in salary to bring them up to 10% below market and the salary ranges will be adjusted accordingly: 1. The Animal Services Supervisor showed to be 21.98% below market and will receive a 12% increase to bring the position 10% below market. 2. The Human Resources Technician showed to be 14.26% below market and will receive a 4.5% increase to bring the position to 10% below market. SECTION 3: SALARY STRUCTURE All employees will be assigned to salary ranges which are no less than 20% (40 salary code steps) below the control point and no more than 10% (20 salary code steps) above the control point. Actual salary within the range is determined by performance, achievement of goals and objectives, or for recent appointments, growth within the position. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, the following changes will be made to the salary schedule: Eliminate the bottom 10% of pay range for the Administrative Assistant position Page 116 3 Current bottom step 4349 ($2684) New bottom step 4369 ($2965) Eliminate Library Page II position SECTION 4: SALARY SURVEY The City shall conduct a salary survey of labor market cities approximately six months before the start of new labor negotiations for the next MOU. SECTION 5: SUPERVISORY PROFESSIONAL BENEFITS Employees designated as Supervisory Professional are not eligible for overtime pay, or compensatory time for working hours over and above the normal daily work schedule. Employees so designated shall be entitled to all benefits provided to general employees and the following: A.Administrative Leave - Fifty (50) hours per fiscal year. Days off must be approved by appropriate supervisor. B.Life Insurance -Additional life insurance in the amount of $20,000 (total $50,000). C.Deferred Compensation - Two percent (2%) of base salary. SECTION 6: LIFE INSURANCE The City provides $30,000 base coverage of life insurance for all employees. Employees who want to purchase additional life insurance coverage with personal funds may do so at the City's group rate. SECTION 7: HEALTH INSURANCE A.LEVEL OF BENEFIT The City shall provide employee and family health insurance for all existing full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining group, subject to limitation that no such monthly funding by the City shall exceed $1,175 per month and $542.31 per pay period rounded. No change to use of funds. B.USE OF ACCRUED VACATION FOR ABOVE CITY-PAID CONTRIBUTION MAXIMUM HEALTH INSURANCE Employees who elect a health insurance program with a premium above the City- paid contribution maximum may also elect to use the cash value of redeemed accrued vacation to pay for any above maximum premium. Such use will be on a dollar-for dollar and pre-tax basis. Such election must be made in writing, may cover all or a specified part over the maximum premium, and be effective for one calendar year unless the participant terminates employment with the City during the year (see Appendix A for complete information on this optional benefit). If accrued vacation is insufficient to pay for any above maximum premium, the difference will Page 117 4 be deducted from the employee’s net pay. This periodic payout will not be included in the computation of overtime and will not counts towards Vacation Buyback. The parties agree that this position will not be used when bargaining, contemplating, or calculating the health insurance benefit. C.CASH IN-LIEU PAYMENT Represented employees who had waived coverage under a City-paid medical insurance plan and were receiving a cash in-lieu payment in the amount of $200 per month for single coverage or $300 per month for family coverage as of September 30, 2012, may continue to receive this cash in-lieu payment as long as they remain eligible. To be eligible, an employee must provide the following: (1) proof that the employee and all individuals for whom the employee intends to claim a personal exemption deduction for the taxable year or years that begin or end in or with the City’s plan year to which the opt out applies (“tax family”), have or will have minimum essential coverage through another source (other than coverage in the individual market, whether or not obtained through Covered California) for the plan year to which the opt out arrangement applies (“opt out period”); and (2) the employee must sign an attestation that the employee and his/her tax family have or will have such minimum essential coverage for the opt out period. An employee must sign an attestation every plan year at open enrollment or within 30 days after the start of the plan year. The opt-out payment cannot be made and the City will not in fact make payment if the employer knows that the employee or tax family member does not have such alternative coverage, or if conditions in this paragraph are not otherwise satisfied. No other represented employees shall be eligible for this benefit. Employees not receiving cash in-lieu as of September 30, 2012, may still waive coverage by providing the proof of insurance as noted above, but will not receive a cash in-lieu payment. D.AFFORDABLE CARE ACT REOPENER The Rancho Cucamonga City Employee Association or City may reopen negotiations on the issue of health insurance benefits to address changes to or the elimination of the ACA and in order to avoid penalties or taxes under the ACA or other statutory scheme that may result from an interpretation of the ACA or other statutory scheme by the Internal Revenue Service or other federal agency (including, but not limited to, a revenue ruling, regulation or other guidance) or state agency, or a ruling by a court of competent jurisdiction. These negotiations will not result in a reduction or increase in the amount the City provides for employee health coverage. SECTION 8: RETIREE MEDICAL Subject to the conditions stated below, effective upon a service or disability retirement from City service at or beyond age 55 with 10 consecutive years of City service at the time of retirement, retirees shall be eligible to 100% personally fund, without any City contribution, participation in a group health insurance program(s) which is making group health insurance available to the City's retirees. It is agreed and acknowledged by the parties to this MOU that no representation is or can be Page 118 5 made by the City, that such group retiree health insurance is available, or if available, will remain available for any specific future period of time. If no such group health insurance is reasonably available, or if the private carrier(s) terminates such coverage as to the retiree group or any individual group member, the City shall have no obligation/duty to self-fund or otherwise provide insurance or replacement insurance. All premiums for the retiree and/or eligible dependents shall be borne by the retiree. The City shall advance and submit the necessary premiums to the carrier(s), subject to the retiree reimbursing the City not later than 30 calendar days after City payment of the premium. Failure to timely reimburse the City shall result in no further premium payments being made by the City, resulting in termination of insurance coverage. The City's duty to advance said premiums shall terminate at age 65 of the retiree, regardless of whether or not the retiree is eligible for Medicare. City shall advise the group carrier of the insured's status as a retiree. Coverage eligibility shall then be solely determined by the group insurance carrier(s). It is likely that premium rates for retirees and/or dependents shall be greater than rates for employees. Regardless, retirees shall pay 100% of said rates. If at any time, it is determined by any group health insurance carrier that the City is prohibited from seeking premium reimbursement from a retiree, City affiliation and retiree enrollment in said group insurance plan shall immediately terminate upon rendering of the insurance carrier's decision. In such case, no retiree shall seek reimbursement from the City for any prior premiums paid by the retiree to the City as and for premium reimbursement. SECTION 9: VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT ASSOCIATION (VEBA) The City has established a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) through the California Government Voluntary Employee Benefit Association to assist employees with planning for future health care expenses. Employees are allowed a onetime election to opt into the plan. Represented employees shall be eligible to participate in the plan according to a schedule negotiated separately from this agreement. Contributions to the Plan shall be made as City contributions through a salary reduction arrangement. All contributions made on behalf of employees through such salary reduction arrangement are made on a pre-tax basis in accordance with IRS provisions. No Employer contributions are to be made to the plan. At the discretion of the applicable bargaining unit, contributions may be amended once per year provided that such amendment is permitted by IRS regulations and in conformity with the Plan Document. SECTION 10: DEFERRED COMPENSATION The City will match dollar for dollar up to $50 per month and 1% of monthly base salary per month in deferred compensation for any RCCEA covered employee who pays up to $50 and 1% of monthly base salary into deferred compensation through payroll Page 119 6 deductions. Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, Deferred Compensation participation for new bargaining unit members shall be automatic with an opt-out provision for new members. The contribution made by the employee through automatic enrollment will be capped at maximum contribution of $50 per month. These provisions are in addition to any other deferred compensation provisions in this MOU. SECTION 11: FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT PLAN UNDER SECTION 125 The City has established a flexible spending account plan managed by a third-party administrator that is open to voluntary participation of members in the bargaining unit. The City agrees to pick up all administrative fees associated with maintaining this program for bargaining unit members (including but not limited to debit card fees). SECTION 12: DENTAL INSURANCE The City shall provide a dental insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit. SECTION 13: OPTICAL INSURANCE The City shall provide an optical insurance plan for all full-time continuous salaried employees within the bargaining unit and elected officials. SECTION 14: BEREAVEMENT LEAVE When a death occurs in the family of a full-time employee, the employee shall be granted up to 80 hours of bereavement leave with pay. A death certificate or other acceptable evidence may be required by the City Manager or designee before leave is allowed. Family members are defined as follows: employee's spouse or domestic partner, employee's parents, employee's grandparents, employee's children, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, employee's siblings, or employee's grandchildren, employee's spouse or domestic partner's parents, employee's spouse or domestic partner's grandparents, grandparents-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, employee's spouse or domestic partner's children, employee's spouses grandchildren, or a blood relative residing with employee. The City Manager or designee shall approve such bereavement leave. (References to domestic partner refer to registered domestic partners, as defined by California Family Code Section 297.) SECTION 15: PERSONAL LEAVE Employees can use up to 40 hours of accrued sick leave, vacation, administrative leave or holiday time as personal leave. These 40 hours can be used incrementally (i.e., 1 hour, 1/2 hour) throughout the fiscal year. Use of this time is for situations requiring the employee's attention and needs to be cleared with their supervisor when using this time. Page 120 7 SECTION 16: VACATION All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue working hours of vacation monthly according to the following schedule. Length of Service in Years Hours Accrued Per Pay Period Annual Hours Accrued 1 3.077 80 2 3.461 90 3 3.846 100 4 4.230 110 5 4.615 120 6-8 5.000 130 9 5.384 140 10 5.769 150 11-13 6.153 160 14 6.538 170 15+6.923 180 SECTION 17: VACATION CAP Any hours accrued over 1040 hours will be cashed out using the options below: Cash Deferred compensation contributions as allowed by law The employees make an irrevocable decision before the end of the calendar year and the payment or distribution will occur in April. SECTION 18: VACATION BUYBACK Annually, any employee that wants to have the City buy back vacation hours shall make an irrevocable election to do so. The irrevocable election shall be submitted in writing to the City’s Human Resources Department on or before December 15 and shall indicate the number of hours of vacation that the employee expects to earn in the following calendar year that the employee wants the City to buy back, with a minimum buy back of 20 hours up to a maximum of 160 hours. This buy back shall occur twice annually, in June (between the last payday in June and the first payday in July) and November (between the last pay day in November and the first payday in December), and the employee must indicate the total amount of hours they want to paid out in June and in November. Regardless of the number of hours requested to be cashed out at either time, the most the City can cash out is the number of hours accrued and available in that calendar year to date. Employees must maintain a minimum of 40 hours of accrued vacation subsequent to any payment of vacation buyback time. SECTION 19: VACATION ACCRUAL City Manager may provide an accrual rate for new Supervisory Professional employees up to the equivalent of a five-year employee upon hire. This is important as many experienced candidates have a significant time in the public sector and might have to begin at a much lower accrual rate than they receive at their current agency. Page 121 8 SECTION 20: SICK LEAVE All full-time employees shall, with continuous service, accrue 120 hours of sick leave annually. Sick leave accrual (10 hours/month), begins on the first day of employment and can be taken after ninety (90) days of service. A. Personal Sick Leave Employees can use sick leave for personal illness, injury, a health-related reason (such as the diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventive care. B. Family Sick Leave Employees can use sick leave for the illness or injury of a health-related reason (such as the diagnosis, care or treatment of a health condition), or preventive care of qualified family member. For the purpose of Family Sick Leave, a qualified member means the employee’s: child (includes any age or dependency status, or for whom the employee is a legal ward or stands in loco parentis), parent (includes person who stood in loco parentis of the employee as a child), parent-in-law, spouse, registered domestic partner, grandparent, grandparent-in-law, great-grandparent, great-grandparent-in-law, grandchild, great- grandchild, or sibling. C. Other Statutory Use Sick leave can be used to cover an absence for an employee who is victim of domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking to: (a) Obtain or attempt to obtain a temporary restraining order or other court assistance to help ensure the health, safety, or welfare of the employee or their child(ren). (b) Obtain medical attention or psychological counseling; services from a shelter; program or crisis center; or participate in safety planning or other actions to increase safety. D. Medical Certification In the event sick leave absences due to personal illness or injury, which exceeds three (3) consecutive workdays, the Department Head or Human Resources may require a physician’s statement indicating the employee’s fitness to return to work. Should the City suspect that there is an abuse of sick leave by an employee, the City may require that the employee submit to Human Resources a physician’s certification to support the absence. SECTION 21: SICK LEAVE BUYBACK Employees within the bargaining unit who terminate their city employment after 5 years of continuous service can sell 120 hours back to the City. Page 122 9 SECTION 22: HOLIDAYS The City Offices shall observe the following 14 holidays. All full time continuous salaried employees shall be compensated at their regular rate for these days. (1) July 4 Independence Day (2) First Monday of September Labor Day (3) November 11 Veteran's Day (4) Fourth Thursday of November Thanksgiving Day (5) Day following Thanksgiving Floater (6) December 24 Day preceding Christmas (7) December 25 Christmas Day (8) January 1 New Year’s Day (9) Third Monday of January Martin Luther King's Birthday (10) Third Monday of February President’s Day (11) Last Monday of May Memorial Day (12) Three discretionary days may be taken by an employee at his/her convenience subject to approval of the department head. Days may not be carried over from one fiscal year to the next. Whenever a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday shall be observed as a holiday. Whenever a holiday falls on a Friday or Saturday, the preceding Thursday shall be observed as the holiday. When a holiday combination occurs (Thanksgiving, Christmas, etc.) where two consecutive days are holidays and it would result in the City Hall being open to serve the public only 2 days during the week, only one of the holidays will be observed and the other holiday will become a floating holiday, except as provided during a Holiday Closure pursuant to Section 38. For example, for Thanksgiving, Thursday will be observed as the regular holiday; however, Friday will become a floating holiday to be used at a later date. In the instance of Thanksgiving, Christmas, or New Year’s, employees will have until June 30 to use those floating holidays accrued between Thanksgiving and New Years. Also, those days will not accrue as floating holidays until the actual holiday has occurred. Each year the City will designate which days will be observed and which are floating holidays. Employees who are eligible to bank a holiday have until June 30 (end of fiscal year) to use the banked holiday earned from July 1 through April 30. Any holiday banked in May and June, employees have until September 30 to use the banked holiday. SECTION 23: HOLIDAY TIME The City agrees that employees who are assigned to work on a holiday, whether or not their regular shift assignment requires they work that day, are eligible for pay at time and one-half for working that day. This time and one-half may be taken as compensation or put in a compensatory time off bank, (in effect, compensating at double time and one-half). That rate of compensation is tallied as follows: The ten hours compensation for the holiday, plus compensation at time and one-half for the hours actually worked. This payment at time and Page 123 10 one-half abrogates the employee's right to that holiday. SECTION 24: PREMIUM HOLIDAY COMPENSATION Maintenance employees in the bargaining unit required as part of the regular work assignment to work on Christmas Day, New Year’s Day, Independence Day or Thanksgiving Day, are allowed to observe the holiday on another day. Additionally, these employees who work on the aforementioned designated holidays may select to receive compensation on that holiday at time and one-half for the ten-hour shift or take a second holiday as time off at a later date. SECTION 25: HOLIDAY FACILITY CLOSURE City Facilities will observe a holiday closure beginning Thursday, December 23, 2021 through Friday, December 31, 2021. During the term of this MOU, there will be Holiday Facility Closures, certain City facilities may close in conjunction with the Christmas and New Year’s holidays. Closure dates for City facilities shall be determined by the City in order to balance the impact on public services. The City will strive to provide a schedule of Holiday Facility closures at least six months or more in advance of the closure. During a holiday closure, affected represented employees may take paid leave from holiday, management leave, compensatory time, vacation accruals, or use unpaid leave. When holiday closures are implemented by the City, section 19’s provisions regarding consecutive holidays shall not apply. SECTION 26: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITHOUT PAY The City shall provide employees within the bargaining unit up to four months natal and adoption leave for the birth or adoption of a child including the paid leave as outlined below; such leave shall be pursuant to the provisions of the California Pregnancy Disability Act ("PDA"; California Government Code Section 12945), if applicable. The City's PDA policy is incorporated herein by reference. Employees on this leave of absence without pay beyond the four-month period will be responsible for the payment of medical, dental and optical premiums to keep the coverage in force during the leave of absence. SECTION 27: NATAL AND ADOPTION LEAVE WITH PAY Employees within the bargaining unit are granted up to 80 hours of natal and adoption leave with pay for the birth or adoption of a child, however, use of the 80 paid hours does not extend any time charged under FMLA or CFRA. Any paid time required beyond this initial 80 hours must be charged to sick leave, vacation, compensatory or floating holiday time. SECTION 28: WORKERS COMPENSATION LEAVE Any employee covered herein who is receiving disability payments under the "Workers Compensation Act of California" for on-the-job injuries sustained while engaged in the performance of duties of any such City position, shall receive from the City during the first three months of such disability absence, payments in an amount equal to the difference between the disability payments received under Workers Compensation Act and the Page 124 11 employee's full salary. Such payments by the City should be made without any deduction from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one-hour increments. SECTION 29: MILITARY LEAVE Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation, the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period. SECTION 30: MILITARY SERVICE BUYBACK Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense. SECTION 31: OVERTIME For the purposes of overtime calculations only hours worked, vacation leave, holiday leave, and comp time shall be considered hours worked. Use of sick leave does not count towards hours worked for the purposes of determining overtime. Overtime is compensated at 1.5 times the employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) rate of pay. Only hours worked as defined here shall be considered for the purpose of calculating the FLSA pay. A.Maintenance (Non-Teamsters) The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 8 or 10 worked in that shift depending on their regular schedule. Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or an emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 8 or 10 in that 12-hour shift depending on their regular schedule will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week. SECTION 32: COMPENSATORY TIME An employee that works overtime may decide to accrue compensatory time off (CTO) at 1.5 times the number of overtime hours worked instead of receiving immediate payment for overtime worked. The maximum CTO that an employee may accrue is 240 hours. Once an employee reaches that accrual cap, all additional overtime worked shall be paid. Employees Page 125 12 may use CTO as time off, subject to supervisor approval. Supervisor shall not unreasonably withhold approval for use of accrued CTO, and the need to replace the employee using CTO with another employee on overtime shall not be the basis for denying a requested use of CTO. SECTION 33: CALL BACK PAY (non-exempt) If an employee is required to be called back to work after completing his or her normal shift or after having left City premises or the employee’s work location, the employee shall be compensated at the rate for each hour worked on call back with a minimum of two (2) hours call back compensation at the appropriate rate, regardless of whether the employee actually works less than two (2) hours. The time starts when the call back call is received by the employee. Employees must arrive at the worksite and perform the work required in order to receive callback pay. When an employee is called on his/her day off or after hours for work purposes, the employee shall be compensated at the appropriate rate of pay or in comp time if applicable for the actual time worked, rounded to the nearest quarter hour (.25). SECTION 34: ON CALL PAY Employees required to be on call shall be compensated at the rate of $200.00 per week. SECTION 35: BILINGUAL PAY Bargaining Unit employees who qualify for bilingual pay will be provided such at $75.00 per month, Each Department Head will determine the number of employees needed to perform translation duties per department, subject to review and approval of the Deputy City Manager/ Administrative Services. Employees who receive bilingual pay are expected to perform translation services for their Department and for other City Services should the need arise. An updated list of the employees receiving bilingual pay will be provided every six-months or as changes occur. Bilingual duties will be distributed as equitable as possible. SECTION 36: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS A.Safety Footwear The City will provide up to $350.00 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The current classification of employees who may be required to wear safety footwear are Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Officer I & II, Assistant Engineer, Building Inspector, Building Inspector Supervisor, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Community Improvement Supervisor, Environmental Programs Coordinator, Environmental Programs Inspector, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works Inspector, Public Works Inspector I, Public Works Inspector II, Safety Coordinator, Senior Animal Services Officer, Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, and Supervising Public Works Inspector. Page 126 13 Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, this allowance would permit the use of the allowance for the purchase of both shoes and accessories. B.Uniforms The City may provide uniforms (including shirts) and/or maintenance of uniforms for the following positions: Animal Care Attendant, Animal Caretaker, Animal Care Supervisor, Animal Handler, Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Dispatcher, Animal Services Officer I & II, Building Inspector, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Office Specialist II (Animal Care & Services), Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, Theatre Production Supervisor, and Theatre Technician III. The City will provide 4-5 shirts per year for positions required to wear City shirts: Community Improvement Officers (Senior I &II), Business License Technicians, Building Inspectors (I & II) and Technicians, Public Works Inspectors (I & II). The City reports CalPERS on an annual basis the actual value of compensation paid or the monetary value for the purchase, rental and/or maintenance of required clothing for RCCEA covered CalPERS’ Classic Members. The parties analyzed the value and determined it shall not exceed $580.00 per fiscal year. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571 (a)(5) Statutory Items. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. SECTION 37: RETIREMENT BENEFIT Unit members who do not meet the definition of “new member” under the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) (those unit members shall be referred to as "classic members") are enrolled in either the CalPERS retirement plan commonly referred to as the 2.5% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 1" and "Tier 2"), or in the 2% at age 55 retirement plan ("Tier 3") and shall be provided the benefits as described below: A. Tier 1 – Employees Hired Before September 1, 2010 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays the normal eight percent (8%) CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution per Resolution 15-090. Page 127 14 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay five percent (5%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay three percent (3%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. B. Tier 2 – Employees Hired Between September 1, 2010 and July 3, 2011 § 21354.4 2.5% at 55 Full Formula § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20042 1 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays seven percent (7%) of the normal CalPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay four percent (4%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution and one percent (1%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 15-090. 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay five percent (5%) of the CalPERS member contribution, and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay three percent (3%) of the CalPERS member contribution, and employees shall pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect to reflect this change prior to the effective date. C. Tier 3 – Employees Hired on or After July 4, 2011 § 21354 2% @ 55 Full Formula Page 128 15 § 21574 4th Level 1959 Survivor § 20037 3 Yr Final Compensation 1. Effective July 4, 2011, the City pays six percent (6%) of the normal CalPERS member contribution; employee pays one percentage point (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution per Resolution 11-063. 2. Effective 7/11/16, employees shall pay four percent (4%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution for a total of one percent (1%) of the CalPERS member contribution and four percent (4%) of the employer contribution per Resolution 15-090. 3. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2019, the City will pay four percent (4%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees shall pay three percent (3%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution and two percent (2%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS employer contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. 4. Effective the first full pay period beginning in January of 2020, the City will pay two percent (2%) of the CalPERS member contribution and employees pay five percent (5%) of their PERSable compensation towards the CalPERS member contribution. The City will adopt a resolution to reflect this change prior to the effective date. D.It is understood that all contributions paid by the employee as described in Parts A through C above shall be calculated based upon the full base salary of the employee, plus any additional PERSable compensation, and any Employer Paid Member Contributions (EPMC). E.The City pays EPMC for the various "Tiers" as outlined above and reports the value of EPMC payments as special compensation. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571(a)(1)(F) as Value of Employer-Paid Member Contributions. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise. The City adopted a resolution providing that all employee CalPERS contributions shall be deducted on a pre-tax basis to the extent permitted by law or IRS regulation. All employee payments of the employer share are done pursuant to Government Code Section 20516(f). There shall be no sunset date to any provision in Section 30. F.The California Public Employees' Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA) -As it may Page 129 16 from time to time exist, the PEPRA shall in its entirety be given full force and effect. Any provision in this MOU which contradicts any provision of the PEPRA shall be deemed null and void, with the contrary PEPRA provision(s) being given full force and effect. Therefore, no provision of PEPRA shall be deemed to impair any provision of this MOU or any MOU, Agreement, Rule or Regulation predating this MOU. PEPRA includes, but is not limited to, the provisions described below: Unit members hired on and after January 1, 2013, deemed to be a "new member" as defined in Government Code§ 7522.04, shall individually pay an initial Member CALPERS contribution rate of 50% of the normal cost rate for the Defined Benefit Plan in which said "new member'' is enrolled, rounded to the nearest quarter of 1%, or the current contribution rate of similarly situated employees, whichever is greater. Unit members who are "new members" and miscellaneous employees on and after January 1, 2013, shall be enrolled in the 2%@ 62 retirement formula (Govt. Code§ 7522.20). Unit members who are "new members" on and after January 1, 2013, shall have "final compensation" measured by the highest average annual pensionable compensation earned by the member during a period of at least 36 consecutive months (Section 7522.32.), and their retirement benefits shall be calculated based on "pensionable compensation" (Section 7522.10) rather than "compensation earnable" (Section 20636). G.In addition, the City has adopted the PARS Retirement Enhancement Plan generally described as .5% (one-half percent) at 55 or at 60, depending upon the employee's hire date, for all miscellaneous employees hired on or prior to December 31, 2012. To be eligible, employees must be at least age 56, have ten (10) years of full-time continuous service and retire from the City. This benefit will be paid to qualified retirees in addition to any CalPERS benefits to which they are entitled. H. Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC) 1. Effective July 4, 2011: This benefit shall consist of paying 8% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 7% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 2063(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 6% of the normal contributions as EPMC, and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Page 130 17 Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. Payment of EPMC and reporting the value of EPMC on compensation earnable is on pay rate and special compensation except special compensation delineated in Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) which is the monetary value of EPMC on compensation earnable. 2.Effective the first full pay period in January of 2019: This benefit shall consist of paying 5% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 5% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010 and before July 4, 2011. This benefit shall consist of paying 4% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. 3.Effective the first full pay period in January of 2020: This benefit shall consist of paying 3% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010. This benefit shall consist of paying 3% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired prior to September 1, 2010 and before July 4, 2011. This benefit shall consist of paying 2% of the normal contributions as EPMC and reporting the same percent (value) of compensation earnable (excluding Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) as additional compensation for employees hired on or after July 4, 2011. Payment of EPMC and reporting the value of EPMC on compensation earnable is on pay rate and special compensation except special compensation delineated in Government Code Section 20636(c)(4)) which is the monetary value of EMPC on compensation earnable. Page 131 18 SECTION 38: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COURSES Reimbursements by t he City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed two thousand three hundred dollars ($2,300.00) during any fiscal year. Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $2,300.00 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all the following conditions precedent exists: A.Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or university that is licensed/accredited by one of the six regional accreditors involved in higher education accreditation in the United States. B.The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of "C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C" or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received). C.Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1) those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major. D.Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s) for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regards shall be final. E.The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought. Page 132 19 SECTION 39: ENCOURAGING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Promotions are movements to a different classification with a higher pay range. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to seek regular performance feedback from their direct supervisors and other Department leadership for professional development and in order to prepare to compete for future promotional opportunities. If a member applies for a promotion to a bargaining unit position and is not selected for an interview or has an interview but is not selected for the job, the employee is encouraged to request feedback from their supervisor as to reasons why they were not selected. The supervisor will work other Department personnel and/or Human Resources to provide a response to the requesting employee within 30 days of the request. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to register on the City’s employment portal to be informed of promotional opportunities by email, and to check their City email account regularly for information regarding promotional opportunities. SECTION 40: REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS AND RECERTIFICATIONS The City will pay for the cost of any required certifications or recertification required of employees to maintain their positions. Required certifications must be outlined in an employee’s classification specification. The Department Director, with the approval of the City Manager, can add to but not eliminate certifications and recertifications that Departments will cover the costs for employees to maintain. Any additions by the Department Head must be applied equally to all employees in that classification. SECTION 41: 4/10 WORK WEEK City Hall generally operates on a 4/10 work week, hours 7am to 6pm, Monday through Thursday. However, different work schedules consisting of various work hours and days may be adopted by individual departments based on departmental need. Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times. SECTION 42: DIRECT DEPOSIT All new bargaining unit members are required to enroll in direct deposit. Vacation buy back and comp time payouts can be by paper check. SECTION 43: CARPOOL PROGRAM The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full-time regular employees. Participation is voluntary, and employees interested in participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is $2.60 per day for every day that the bargaining unit employee carpools. Page 133 20 SECTION 44: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES The City will provide RCCEA with a list of specific Confidential Employees whose positions are covered by the Supervisory/Professional or General Employees' bargaining units. These employees are designated as Confidential Employees due to the work they perform related to employer-employee relations and the access they have to information related to employer-employee relations. The City will update that list when a new confidential employee is hired, or the duties of a current confidential employee changes and they are no longer involved in employer employee relations. Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City, may not represent employees in discipline or grievance procedures and may not provide information or participate in labor negotiation on behalf of RCCEA. Confidential Employees may be employed in some of the following positions (this list is not exhaustive): SECTION 45: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS AND CITY EMAIL SYSTEM The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist, for RCCEA notices. Such space will be no less than 18" x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a Bargaining Unit work or break area, the RCCEA may, after receiving approval in writing from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. RCCEA may also distribute notices to covered employees through the City's email system. Bulletin boards and emails shall only be used for the following notices: Scheduled RCCEA meetings, agenda and minutes. Information on RCCEA elections and the results. Information regarding RCCEA social, recreational, and related news bulletins. Reports of official business of RCCEA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors. City equipment (including City computers, laptops, and tablets), materials, or supplies shall not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, defamatory, or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an Account Technician Management Analyst Series Administrative Assistant Payroll Supervisor Administrative Technician Risk Analyst Budget Analyst Risk Management Coordinator Executive Assistant I Senior Account Technician Executive Assistant II Senior Accountant Human Resources Technician Senior Risk Management Analyst Page 134 21 authorized representative of RCCEA. RCCEA agrees to follow the City's E-Mail Policy when sending emails to City employees. RCCEA understands that all electronic mail is not confidential, and that the city reserves the right to access and disclose all messages sent over its email system for any purpose in accordance with the City's E-Mail Policy. SECTION 46: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Officers and representatives of RCCEA to confer with Bargaining Unit employees during working hours. Therefore, RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives, Officers or representatives will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations. The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with RCCEA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure. SECTION 47: DUES DEDUCTIONS RCCEA membership dues shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of RCCEA employee per the direction of RCCEA. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to an RCCEA account, provided to the City by RCCEA, on a regular basis consistent with the City’s regular pay periods. RCCEA dues shall be deducted in an amount per bi- weekly pay period authorized by the RCCEA Board of Directors. A.Separation from Unit The provisions of this Agreement shall not apply during periods that an employee is in out of paid status for more than thirty (30) days. If an employee is paid for a prior out of paid status his/her representational dues shall be deducted and paid to the Association. B.Forfeiture of Deductions If the balance of the employee’s wages, after all other involuntary and insurance premium deductions are made in any one pay period, is not sufficient to pay deductions required by this Agreement, no such deduction shall be made for that period. Page 135 22 C.Maintenance of Membership Clause Any employee in this unit who has authorized Association dues deductions on the effective date of this memorandum of understanding or at any time subsequent to the effective date of his memorandum of understanding shall continue to have such deductions made by the City until such time that the Association notifies the City to stop collecting dues; provided however, that any employee in the unit may terminate such association dues during the month of November by notifying any association official in writing of his/her termination of Association from which dues deductions are to be canceled. Such notification shall be delivered in person or by U.S mail and should be in the form of a letter containing the following information: employee name, employee number, job classification, department name and name of the Association (Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association – RCCEA). The association will provide the City’s Human Resources Department with the appropriate documentation to process these dues cancellations within ten (10) business days after the close of the withdrawal period. RCCEA shall hold the City harmless for any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements, or other forms of liability that may arise out of or by reason of action taken by the City under this article. The Association shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless against any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements or other forms of liability that shall arise out of or by reason of, action taken or not taken by the City under this section of the MOU. This includes not only City’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs but the reasonable cost of management preparation time as well. The City shall notify the Association of such costs on a case-by- case basis. SECTION 48: NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION – AB119 City shall provide thirty (30) minutes at a mutually agreeable time during the employee onboarding process for a RCCEA representative to meet with a new RCCEA covered employee and present benefits of being a member of the union. Onboarding of new employees occurs during the first working day at the start of a new pay period up to twenty- six (26) times per year. The City will provide a calendar before the start of a new year. The City will provide RCCEA with at least 10 days-notice, or as soon as practicable, of onboarding of new RCCEA covered employees. A RCCEA representative will have up to 30 minutes of uninterrupted time to meet with new RCCEA covered employees. Prior to meeting, or in no case later than the meeting time, the City will provide the name and job assignment of the new employee to the RCCEA representative. The City will provide designated RCCEA representatives with all available information about the employee as required under AB119 within 30 days of the employees start date and the City will provide information on all RCCEA covered employees again as required by AB119 at least three (3) times per year. SECTION 49: USE OF CITY RESOURCES RCCEA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the public, Page 136 23 provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. RCCEA may also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for RCCEA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by RCCEA from the appropriate management representative. RCCEA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by RCCEA. SECTION 50: ASSOCIATION RELEASE TIME When RCCEA is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City business hours, a reasonable number of Officers or other representatives of the RCCEA shall be allowed reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits. 1.Such Officers and representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2.Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with operating needs and work schedules. RCCEA Officers or representatives shall be permitted, if requested by an RCCEA represented employee, to attend an employee counseling session, which could result in disciplinary action. Such officers or representatives shall also be permitted, if requested by the Association employee, to be present at an employee disciplinary session. 1.Such Officers or representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager. 2.No more than one employee at a time shall be granted release time to represent one employee. RCCEA Officers or representatives of the Association shall be given reasonable time during work hours to investigate and process specified grievances or complaints arising out of the application of MOU or personnel rules, upon prior permission from their respective department head or division manager. During the term of the next MOU, RCCEA Officers and representatives agree to track their Association release time via the payroll system. The City and RCCEA agree to review this usage to determine if limits need to be incorporated into a subsequent MOU. SECTION 51: RELEASE TIME FOR ALL HANDS MEETING RCCEA shall be allowed four (4) ninety (90) minute periods of release time for all hands meetings per fiscal year, including travel time, during work hours. For the purposes of labor negotiations with the City additional meetings may be requested and may be granted by the Human Resources Director. Page 137 24 SECTION 52: LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE The City and RCCEA agree to implement quarterly labor/management committee (LMC) meetings to discuss employee relations issues. The LMC will not be authorized to change the MOU or to settle any grievance. SECTION 53: CONDITIONAL COLA AND DECREASE OF EPMC The City and RCCEA agree to a COLA of 1.5% for all RCCEA covered positions, along with a decrease to the amount of EPMC paid by the City of 1% for all Tier I, II, and III CalPERS classic members, effective the first full pay period in May 2022, if the following terms are met: The third and fourth quarters of CY 2021 include additional sales tax of at least 5% greater (after adjustments for overpayments, mistakes, or other similar items) than the same two quarters in CY 2019. The third and fourth quarters of CY 2021 include Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) that is at least of equal to the same two quarters in CY 2019. The first quarter of CY 2022 includes TOT that is at least equal to the first quarter of 2020. See below for actual numbers triggering amounts. Trigger Amounts* In order to mee t thi s provi si on the amounts must be e qual to or Actual Amounts*gre ater than al l the numbe rs bel ow 3rd Quarter 2019 7,788,649$ 3rd Quarter 2021 8,178,081.45$ At l east 5% gre ater 4th Quarter 2019 8,853,005$ 4th Quarter 2021 9,295,655.25$ At l east 5% gre ater 3rd Quarter 2019 1,027,135$ 3rd Quarter 2021 1,027,135$ Equal to or greate r 4th Quarter 2019 1,010,135$ 4th Quarter 2021 1,010,135$ Equal to or greate r 1st Quarter 2020 897,771$ 1st Quarte r 2022 897,771$ Equal to or greate r *base d on i nformati on gathe red to date If all of the above provisions are not met, there is no automatic COLA increase or EPMC reduction, and these changes will not occur. If all of the above provisions are met, then the MOU will be updated accordingly, and an updated resolution will be provided to CalPERS. Page 138 25 SECTION 54: PRIORITY OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This memorandum of understanding between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association shall take precedent over the Personnel Rules adopted per Resolution 13-065. SECTION 55: ADOPTION OF MOU This memorandum, between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association representing the Supervisory Professional and General Employee bargaining units, was adopted on June 2, 2021. Page 139 26 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association: Date_______________ Date_______________ _________________________ ____________________________ John R. Gillison Mary LaPlante City Manager Managing Labor Representative _________________________ _____________________________ Lori Sassoon Andy Miller Deputy City Manager Maintenance Supervisor _________________________ _____________________________ Robert Neiuber Rudy Linares Human Resources Director Supervising Public Works Inspector _________________________ _____________________________ Jenifer Phillips Crystal Zuniga Deputy Director of HR Community Services Coordinator _________________________ _____________________________ Noah Daniels Jessica Nucci Finance Manager Administrative Assistant Page 140 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Service/City Engineer Sandra Salazar, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration to Award a Contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the Amount of $121,309, Plus a 10% Contingency, and an Appropriation in the Amount of $147,080 for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the School Crosswalk Improvements Project (Project); 2. Accept the bids received for the Project; 3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract to Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., in the amount of $121,309; as being the lowest responsive bidder; 4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $12,131; 5. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $13,640 to Onward Engineering for on-call construction inspection services; and 6. Authorize an Appropriation of $147,080 to CDBG Fund (Fund 204). BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided to the City as entitlement grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (or HUD). On April 15, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan covering the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. The four (4) core strategies of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan include: fair housing services, public services, affordable housing preservation, as well as public facilities and infrastructure improvements. City staff determined the School Crosswalk Improvements Project is eligible for use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The Project is programmed for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Project invoicing will need to be submitted by September 1, 2021 in order to meet CDBG fund draw down requirements. The proposed improvements align with the City’s Safe Routes to School Initiative goals and will benefit pedestrians, including school age youth, utilizing existing school crosswalks. Locations are outlined on the project plans and the vicinity map included as Attachment 1. The scope of work for the Project consists of, but is not limited to, installing solar powered flashing beacons; installing pavement striping and signage including ladder crosswalks; and related items Page 141 Page 2 7 5 5 of work per the Project’s plans. ANALYSIS: The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin on May 11, and May 18, 2021. The City Clerk’s Office facilitated the formal solicitation for bidding the project. On May 25, 2021, the City Clerk's Office received three (3) construction bids. The Engineer’s estimate for the project was $147,000. The apparent low bidder, Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., submitted a bid in the amount of $121,309. Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities being inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc., meets the requirements of the bid documents. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2. Environmental: Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated construction costs for the Project are estimated to be as follows: Expenditure Amount Construction Contract $121,309 Construction Contract Contingency (10%) $12,131 Construction Inspection Services $13,640 Estimated Construction Cost:$147,080 A total of $147,080 will need to be appropriated to the CDBG Fund (Fund 204) for required advertising, design and construction of the Project. Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 1204314-5650/2015204-0 CDBG (Fund 204) School Crosswalks $147,080 Total Project Funding: $147,080 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map Attachment 2 - Bid Summary Page 142 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 1 SCHOOL CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE Project Location 1 of 7: Archibald Ave and 9th St Project Location 2 of 7: Archibald Ave and Tryon St Project Location 3 of 7: Baker Ave and Salina St Project Location 4 of 7: Church St and Layton St Project Location 5 of 7: Baker Ave and 9th St Project Location 6 of 7: Feron Blvd and Villa Del Norte Driveway Project Location 7 of 7: Amethyst Ave and La Grande St Legend: = Project Location(s) Page 143 UNIT UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO.QTY.UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 1 LS Mobilization 12,000.00$ 12,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 2 8 EA Remove and Salvage Sign and Post Per Plan 150.00$ 1,200.00$ 69.00$ 552.00$ 175.00$ 1,400.00$ 100.00$ 800.00$ 3 1 LS Remove Conflicting Pavement Markings by Hydroblast or Approved Methods Per Plan and City STD DWG No. 133 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 6,728.00$ 6,728.00$ 8,700.00$ 8,700.00$ 6,000.00$ 6,000.00$ 4 1 EA Remove Existing Sign and Furnish and Install New Sign on Existing Post Per Plan and City STD DWG No. 401-B 100.00$ 100.00$ 148.00$ 148.00$ 350.00$ 350.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 5 2 EA Furnish and Install New Sign on Existing Post or Pole Per Plan and City STD DWG No. 401-B 100.00$ 200.00$ 120.00$ 240.00$ 200.00$ 400.00$ 200.00$ 400.00$ 6 8 EA Furnish and Install Solar Powered Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon, 14' Pole, 12 Guage 2-1/2" Square, 3" 7 Gauge Anchor, Push Button, Foundation (Type 1-B), Controller, Solar Panels, Batteries, School Crosswalk Warning Assembly B (CA) and Left and Right Down Arrow Signs (2EA), and Appurtenances Per Plan and Specifications. Complete in Place 10,000.00$ 80,000.00$ 10,485.00$ 83,880.00$ 11,500.00$ 92,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 120,000.00$ 7 2 EA Furnish and Install Sign and Post Per Plan and City STD DWG No. 401-B 250.00$ 500.00$ 257.00$ 514.00$ 725.00$ 1,450.00$ 300.00$ 600.00$ 8 1 LS Striping Including Installation of Thermoplastic Double Yellow Centerline, 4” Yellow Skip Centerline Pavement Markings, Thermoplastic Legends, Thermoplastic White Yield Line Triangle, Thermoplastic Ladder Type Crosswalk Per Plan and Per Caltrans Standards in the Appendix. Complete in Place 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 16,232.00$ 16,232.00$ 25,200.00$ 25,200.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 9 1 LS Traffic Control 14,000.00$ 14,000.00$ 6,015.00$ 6,015.00$ 6,600.00$ 6,600.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 10 1 LS Expedite Materials Allowance 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ TOTAL BID SCHEDULE AMOUNTS =147,000.00$ 121,309.00$ 142,600.00$ 159,000.00$ BID SCHEDULE T S R Construction and Inspections BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING MAY 25, 2021 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE SCHOOL CROSSWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Elecnor Belco Electric, Inc.DBX, Inc. APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2 3 ATTACHMENT 2 Page 144 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Romeo M. David, Associate Engineer SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with FS Contractors, Inc., in an Amount of $204,350, Plus 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of $238,425, for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations Project. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps at Various Locations (Project); 2. Accept the bids received for the Project; 3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $ 204,350 to the lowest responsive bidder, FS Contractors, Inc., for the total Bid; 4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency in the amount of $20,435; 5. Authorize an Appropriation of $238,425 to CDBG Fund (Fund 204); and 6. Authorize a Purchase Order in the amount of $13,640 to Onward Engineering, Inc. for on- call construction inspection services. BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds are provided to the City as entitlement grants from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (or HUD). On April 15, 2020, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan covering the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2025. The four (4) core strategies of the 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan include: fair housing services, public services, affordable housing preservation, as well as public facilities and infrastructure improvements. Staff has determined that sidewalk improvements on the southwest corner of Hellman Avenue and 9th Street as well as a few accessible (ADA) curb ramp improvements are eligible for use of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. The Project is programmed for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Project invoicing will neet to be submitted by September 1, 2021 in order to meet CDBG fund draw down requirements. The proposed improvements align with the City’s Safe Routes to School Initiative goals and will benefit pedestrians of all abilities. A Vicinity map is included as Attachment 1. The scope of work consists of constructing sidewalks, accessible (ADA) curb ramps, curb and gutter, drive approaches, relocating signs, removing trees, planting 24” box trees, relocating of a Page 145 Page 2 7 5 8 water meter and service line, saw cutting and removing portions of a brick retaining wall, asphalt pavement driveway tie-ins, relocating existing irrigation and controller valve boxes and related items of work per the Project’s plans. The contract documents call for twenty (20) working days to complete this construction. ANALYSIS: The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin on May 11, and May 18, 2020. The City Clerk’s Office facilitated the formal solicitation for bidding the project. On May 25, 2021, the City Clerk’s office received five (5) construction bids. The Engineer’s estimate for the project was $172,100. The apparent low bidder, FS Contractors ( Contactor) submitted a bid in the amount of $204,350. Staff compared the engineer’s estimate to the bid submitted and identified the bid item costs for concrete and traffic signal related bid items as the primary factors leading to the higher than expected costs projected. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2. The Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in accordance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder, FS Contractors, meet the requirements of the bid documents. Environmental: Staff has determined that the project is Categorically Exempt per Section 15301 “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). FISCAL IMPACT: Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows: Expenditure Category Amount Construction Contract $204,350 Construction Contract Contingency (10%)20,435 Construction Inspection Services $13,640 Estimated Construction Costs $238,425 A total of $238,425 will need to be appropriated to the CDBG Fund (Fund 204) for required advertising, design, and construction of the Project. Account No.Funding Source Description Amount 12043145650/2016204-0 CCDBG Fund (204) Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvement and ADA Ramps at Various Locations $238,425 Total Project Appropriation $238,425 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements. Page 146 Page 3 7 5 8 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map Attachment 2 – Bid Summary Page 147 Hellman Avenue Sidewalk Improvements and ADA Ramps Vicinity Map NOT TO SCALE Project Site Hellman Ave Sidewalk Project Site Ramps @ Layton St and Church Street and Ramps @ Tryon St and Archibald Ave Ramps @ Archibald Ave and 9th Street Ramps @ Amethyst Ave and La Grande ATTACHMENT 1Page148 UNIT UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 1 LS MOBILIZATION 8,290.00 8,290.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 20,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 2 1 LS CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND REMOVAL - INCLUDING DISPOSAL 2,000.00 2,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 11,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 15,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 36,000.00$ 3 1,685 SF CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 101 AND 103 10.00 16,850.00$ 10.00$ 16,850.00$ 6.00$ 10,110.00$ 10.00$ 16,850.00$ 8.00$ 13,480.00$ 4 50 LF CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND 1.5' WIDE GUTTER PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 104 (A2-8) TO MATCH EXISTING 35.00 1,750.00$ 70.00$ 3,500.00$ 60.00$ 3,000.00$ 75.00$ 3,750.00$ 104.00$ 5,200.00$ 5 410 SF CONSTRUCT 6" THICK PCC DRIVEWAY AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD. DWG NO 101 (TYPE R-1) 20.00 8,200.00$ 12.00$ 4,920.00$ 15.00$ 6,150.00$ 16.00$ 6,560.00$ 19.00$ 7,790.00$ 6 20 LF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 6" PCC CURB PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 104 (A1-6)25.00 500.00$ 45.00$ 900.00$ 40.00$ 800.00$ 70.00$ 1,400.00$ 51.00$ 1,020.00$ 7 7 EA RELOCATE PARKING SIGNS 200.00 1,400.00$ 300.00$ 2,100.00$ 500.00$ 3,500.00$ 400.00$ 2,800.00$ 280.00$ 1,960.00$ 8 5 EA REMOVE EXISTING TREE INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP (SIZE 12" TO 36" DIA.)1,500.00 7,500.00$ 1,200.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 6,000.00$ 1,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 1,800.00$ 9,000.00$ 9 4 EA PLANT 24" BOX SILK OAK TREE 1,000.00 4,000.00$ 500.00$ 2,000.00$ 1,200.00$ 4,800.00$ 1,500.00$ 6,000.00$ 2,400.00$ 9,600.00$ 10 1 EA RELOCATE BACK FLOW DEVICE INCLUDING SERVICE LINE COMPLETE IN PLACE 3,000.00 3,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 3,200.00$ 3,200.00$ 11 10 LF SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE BRICK RETAINING WALL 50.00 500.00$ 50.00$ 500.00$ 50.00$ 500.00$ 100.00$ 1,000.00$ 350.00$ 3,500.00$ 12 210 SF SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND CONSTRUCT 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TIE-IN 30.00 6,300.00$ 10.00$ 2,100.00$ 10.00$ 2,100.00$ 25.00$ 5,250.00$ 19.00$ 3,990.00$ 13 13 EA CONSTRUCT PCC ACCESS RAMP INCLUDING TRUNCATED DECTECTABLE WARNING SURFACES PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETE IN PLACE 7,500.00 97,500.00$ 6,500.00$ 84,500.00$ 8,400.00$ 109,200.00$ 7,800.00$ 101,400.00$ 7,400.00$ 96,200.00$ 14 12 SF CONSTRUCT TRUNCATED DECTECTABLE WARNING SURFACE ON EXISTING CURB RAMP PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETE IN PLACE 25.00 300.00$ 40.00$ 480.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 50.00$ 600.00$ 75.00$ 900.00$ 15 1 LS RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION, CONTROLLER, AND VALVE BOX - MODIFY LANDSCAIPING TO FIT NEW SIDEWALK AND COORDINATE WITH THE BUSINESS OWNER AND INSPECTOR 5,000.00 5,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 7,000.00$ 7,000.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 2,400.00$ 2,400.00$ 16 8 EA INSTALL NEW PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ON NEW POLE PER CALTRANS STD. NO. ES- 5C AND ES-7A (TWO PUSH BUTTON PER POLE) AT RAMP LANDING INCLUDING POLE FOUNDATION, CONDUITS, AND WIRINGS, FROM PUSH BOTTON TO THE CONTROLLER COMPLETE IN PLACE. NOTE: DURING THE WIRING AND CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING CONTROLLER CABINET, AT LEAST ONE TECHNICIAN WHO HOLDS AN IMSA TRAFFIC SIGNAL SENIOR FIELD TECHNICIAN LEVEL II CERTIFICATE MUST BE ON SITE 1,000.00 8,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 32,000.00$ 4,500.00$ 36,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 44,000.00$ 5,500.00$ 44,000.00$ 17 1 EA RELOCATE AIR VACUUM RELEASE VALVE PER CVWD STD DWG. NO. 120 AT NWC OF AMETHYST & LA GRANDE 1,000.00 1,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 12,700.00$ 12,700.00$ 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT 172,090.00$ 204,350.00$ 224,460.00$ 242,110.00$ 251,040.00$ UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BIDNOQTYUNITDESCRIPTIONCOSTAMOUNTCOSTAMOUNTCOSTAMOUNTCOSTAMOUNT 1 1 LS MOBILIZATION 32,000.00$ 32,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 2 1 LS CLEARING, GRUBBING, AND REMOVAL - INCLUDING DISPOSAL 22,000.00$ 22,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 3 1,685 SF CONSTRUCT 4" PCC SIDEWALK PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 101 AND 103 12.00$ 20,220.00$ -$ -$ -$ 4 50 LF CONSTRUCT 8" CURB AND 1.5' WIDE GUTTER PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 104 (A2-8) TO MATCH EXISTING 80.00$ 4,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 5 410 SF CONSTRUCT 6" THICK PCC DRIVEWAY AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH PER CITY STD. DWG NO 101 (TYPE R-1) 17.00$ 6,970.00$ -$ -$ -$ 6 20 LF REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING 6" PCC CURB PER CITY STD. DWG. NO. 104 (A1-6)80.00$ 1,600.00$ -$ -$ -$ 7 7 EA RELOCATE PARKING SIGNS 950.00$ 6,650.00$ -$ -$ -$ 8 5 EA REMOVE EXISTING TREE INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMP (SIZE 12" TO 36" DIA.)1,898.00$ 9,490.00$ -$ -$ -$ 9 4 EA PLANT 24" BOX SILK OAK TREE 633.00$ 2,532.00$ -$ -$ -$ 10 1 EA RELOCATE BACK FLOW DEVICE INCLUDING SERVICE LINE COMPLETE IN PLACE 8,338.00$ 8,338.00$ -$ -$ -$ 11 10 LF SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE BRICK RETAINING WALL 140.00$ 1,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 12 210 SF SAWCUT, REMOVE, AND CONSTRUCT 6" ASPHALT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY TIE-IN 12.00$ 2,520.00$ -$ -$ -$ 13 13 EA CONSTRUCT PCC ACCESS RAMP INCLUDING TRUNCATED DECTECTABLE WARNING SURFACES PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETE IN PLACE 7,200.00$ 93,600.00$ 14 12 SF CONSTRUCT TRUNCATED DECTECTABLE WARNING SURFACE ON EXISTING CURB RAMP PER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLETE IN PLACE 1,200.00$ 14,400.00$ -$ -$ -$ 15 1 LS RELOCATE EXISTING IRRIGATION, CONTROLLER, AND VALVE BOX - MODIFY LANDSCAIPING TO FIT NEW SIDEWALK AND COORDINATE WITH THE BUSINESS OWNER AND INSPECTOR 19,600.00$ 19,600.00$ 16 8 EA INSTALL NEW PEDESTRIAN PUSH BUTTON ON NEW POLE PER CALTRANS STD. NO. ES- 5C AND ES-7A (TWO PUSH BUTTON PER POLE) AT RAMP LANDING INCLUDING POLE FOUNDATION, CONDUITS, AND WIRINGS, FROM PUSH BOTTON TO THE CONTROLLER COMPLETE IN PLACE. NOTE: DURING THE WIRING AND CONNECTION TO THE EXISTING CONTROLLER CABINET, AT LEAST ONE TECHNICIAN WHO HOLDS AN IMSA TRAFFIC SIGNAL SENIOR FIELD TECHNICIAN LEVEL II CERTIFICATE MUST BE ON SITE 4,370.00$ 34,960.00$ -$ -$ -$ 17 1 EA RELOCATE AIR VACUUM RELEASE VALVE PER CVWD STD DWG. NO. 120 AT NWC OF AMETHYST & LA GRANDE 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ -$ -$ -$ TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT 283,080.00$ -$ -$ -$ BASE BID A 8 CT&T CONCRETE PAVING INC. 5 6 7 4 GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING INC.TSR CONSTRUCTION BASE BID A 3 VIDO SAMARZICH, INC. APPARENT LOW BIDDER 2BID SUMMARY FOR BID OPENING May 25, 2021 HELLMAN AVENUE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS AND ADA RAMPS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FS CONTRACTORS, INC. ATTACHMENT 2Page149 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ernest Ruiz, Streets, Storm Drains and Fleet Superintendent Ruth Cain, CPPB, Procurement Manager SUBJECT:Consideration of a Contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $115,000 for FY 2021/2022. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council award and authorize the execution of a contract with National Utility Locators, LLC for Utility Marking Services, effective July 1, 2021 for a term of one (1) year with an option to renew for one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years, in an amount not to exceed $115,000 for FY 2021-2022, and an estimated total contract amount of $805,000 over seven years, contingent upon the approval of the FY 2021/2022 and future budgets, and authorize the City Manager to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: Utility marking services are necessary to protect the City’s underground fiber, electric, and traffic signal equipment when excavation is to be done in the public right-of-way. In April of 2020, the Public Works Services Department reached out to its utility marking services vendor to renew the professional service agreement. The vendor communicated a desire to change the agreement moving forward as they are no longer willing to provide the indemnifications required by the City’s standard professional services agreement. The vendor provided a revised agreement proposing a rate increase and a limitation of their liability for any damages to underground infrastructure that may occur due to errors or omissions on the part of the vendor. Under the proposed agreement, vendor liability is limited to ten percent (10%) of the annual revenues generated under the contract, leaving the City exposed to an increase in costs if infrastructure is damaged during construction. The City receives requests for marking services on a continuous basis and moving forward in this direction was problematic. To maintain the continuity of services, Public Works entered into a temporary modified agreement to provide time to complete a formal Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Public Works staff developed updated utility marking services specifications, with new requirements, and better compliance language. The scope of services includes receiving excavation notices and/or requests directed to the City from anyone performing any type of digging within the City’s jurisdiction. These requests are typically generated through the Underground Services Alert notification center which will forward the information to the contractor providing the marking services to perform underground facility investigations of the City’s fiber, Page 150 Page 2 7 3 3 electric utility, and traffic signal infrastructure in the designated work area. The City utilities identified within the work areas will then be marked in accordance with the American Public Works Association color codes to prevent construction crews from damaging the City underground infrastructure. The specifications were provided to the Procurement Division to prepare an RFP. The Procurement Division prepared and posted RFP #20/21-004 for Utility Marking Services. There were Six Hundred Sixty-Seven (667) notified vendors; Forty (40) prospective bidders downloaded or viewed the bid package, and Six (6) responses were received. ANALYSIS: An Evaluation Committee consisting of staff from various departments conducted a thorough analysis of the RFP responses and scored and ranked the responsive proposals. The vendors were then interviewed and given an opportunity to provide additional information about their services. Upon completion of the ranking and interviews, Procurement reached out to the vendors and requested a best and final offer. National Utility Locators, LLC of Lancaster, California, was determined to be the most responsive contractor providing the best value while meeting the scope of services listed in the specifications. Therefore, staff recommends City Council award a contract to National Utility Locators, LLC, effective July 1, 2021 for a term of one (1) year in an amount not to exceed $115,000 for FY 2021-2022, with an option to renew for one (1) year increments up to a total of six (6) additional years, with an estimated total contract amount of $805,000 over seven years. A copy of the contract agreement is available in the City Clerk’s Office. The utility marking services cost per request will triple under the new agreement. The impact of this increase is partially mitigated by external trends resulting in a reduced demand for these services. The number of requests fluctuate annually based on the number of excavation notices received by the Underground Services Alert notification center for work requiring digging in the public right-of-way. The number of excavation notices peaked in FY 2018/2019 and have since declined steadily. The current excavation notice count is less than half the peak. The budgeted dollar amount for these services is based on this new rate and current trends in the number of excavation notices. However, if the number of excavation notices increase to prior levels as the economy recovers, it will be necessary to increase the budget for these services. FISCAL IMPACT: The funding for this contract service is within the proposed contract services budget line items in the General Fund 318, State Gas Tax Fund 174, Municipal Utility Fund 705, and Fiber Optic Network Fund 711 for FY 2021/2022. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses City Council core values of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring underground City facilities are appropriately marked and maintained. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 151 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT:Consideration of Amendment No. 04 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19-085) in the Amount of $60,400 for the Civic Center East Lot Electric Line Extension Project and Authorization of an Appropriation in the Amount of $60,400. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council: 1. Authorize the execution of an amendment to the existing agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19-085) in the amount of $60,400; and 2. Authorize an appropriation in the amount of $60,400 to Account 1705303-5650/1986705-0 (Capital Projects/Civic Ctr E. Parking Lot-Line Extension) form the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705). BACKGROUND: On March 3, 2021, the City Council approved an amendment to Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder, for construction of the Civic Center East Parking Lot Line Extension project in the amount of $300,845, plus a 5% Contingency. Additionally, the City Council authorized an appropriation in the amount of $118,900 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to fully fund the Project. The scope of work for this Project is a short distribution line extension to extend RCMU’s electric service to the City’s east parking lot consisting of, but not limited to: connection to RCMU’s existing distribution equipment, furnishing and installing new substructure and cabling infrastructure including cables, connections and transformers needed to interconnect to RCMU’s existing infrastructure. The work also included pad mounted equipment and other related work to support future expansion of the electric vehicle fleet charging infrastructure in the east parking lot. ANALYSIS: During construction of the line extension, there were several items that were discovered out in the field that required a change order. These included RCMU’s existing electric distribution conduits being located approximately 80 linear feet away from the location shown on the as-built plans, requiring additional trenching, conduit, backfill, asphalt and concrete work in order to connect to RCMU’s distribution system. Additionally, during construction, the Department of Innovation and Technology requested that RCMU intercept the existing Fiber Optic conduit located on Civic Center Drive and provide an additional 95 linear feet of conduit up to the East parking lot for future connectivity purposes. Both scenarios necessitated a field change order and because the cost of the additional work exceeded the original 5% contingency, staff is requesting Page 152 Page 2 7 6 7 an additional appropriation to fully fund and complete the Project. A copy of Amendment No. 04 is available in the City Clerk’s Office. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of $60,400 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) to Account No. 1705303-5650/1986705-0 (Capital Projects-Civic Ctr E. Parking Lot-Line Extension) is needed to fully fund the Project. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the construction and maintenance of high-quality public improvements that promote a world class community. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 153 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Julie A. Sowles, Library Director Cara Vera, Library Services Manager SUBJECT:Consideration to Approve the Use of EBSCO to Provide Digital Full-Text Reference Database Content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve the use of EBSCO to provide digital full-text reference database content to the Rancho Cucamonga Public Library. BACKGROUND: EBSCO is a leading provider of research databases, e-journals, e-books, and discovery services to public libraries. EBSCO’s digital proprietary database products offer an interactive, searchable platform that encompasses a wide variety of topics and disciplines of interest to Rancho Cucamonga Public Library users. Databases include MasterFILE (magazines, newspaper and journal articles), Academic Search Premier, Consumer Health Complete, Literary Reference Center, Learning Express Library (career, education, and test-taking support), Legal Information Center, Novelist (enhanced catalog and reader’s advisory content), Small Business Complete, and others. Content within each database is accessible through a single search and results portal, creating an efficient and user-friendly experience. ANALYSIS: EBSCO provides library users with the opportunity to access extensive high-quality reference and research content both in the library and remotely. EBSCO includes subscriptions to a number of multidisciplinary databases covering a variety of publishers, publications, and formats. Their primary full-text reference database indexes over 2,000 general reference publications, 1,000 reference books, and over 502,000 photos, maps and flags. Exclusive access is included to several high-demand library resources including Consumer Reports and Nolo Press do-it-yourself legal books. Full-text results such as articles; book chapters; business, personal and legal forms; and videos may be emailed, printed, saved in an individual account, or shared with others. EBSCO offers a simultaneous use model with no limit to the number of users that can access the databases at one time. One of EBSCO’s unique offerings is Novelist Select which integrates with the Library’s online public access catalog to provide cover images, professional reviews, and links to other recommended reading materials. The Library evaluated this enhanced catalog content against similar competitor products and found it to offer the best reader’s advisory content through the Page 154 Page 2 7 6 8 most seamless catalog integration, creating an ideal reader’s advisory experience for Library users. The Library worked with the Procurement Manger to complete a competitive quote process (Request for Quote), which included an evaluation of other public library reference database products. It was determined that no other company could provide similar content and resources within a comparable price range. Staff requests that the City Council accept EBSCO’s quote to provide proprietary databases services to the Library. Copies of all supporting documents are on file with the City Clerk and Procurement Offices. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost for EBSCO is budgeted for FY 2021-2022. The amount funded is not to exceed $28,080 for annual subscription costs. Funding for this service will come from Library Fund object 1290601-5200 Operations & Maintenance. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Providing superior Library Services to residents contributes to a high quality of life in Rancho Cucamonga. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 155 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services SUBJECT:Consideration of Resolutions Approving Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property pursuant to Government Code Section 54233. (RESOLUTIONS NO. 2021-041, 2021-042, FD 2021-008, FD 2021-009, FD 2021-010) (FIRE/CITY COUNCIL) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council and Fire Board adopt the resolutions. BACKGROUND: The City and the Fire District are the owners in fee simple of certain real properties (“Properties”) located at the following locations: Etiwanda Depot – This .54-acre site is located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue. The 3,200 sq/ft historic Etiwanda Depot is located on this site owned by the City. Town Center property – This 7.13-acre undeveloped property consists of two parcels and is located at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Town Center Drive, directly west of City Hall. This site is owned by the City. Civic Center/Utica property – This .92-acre undeveloped property is located just east of the City Hall complex and is owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. San Bernardino Road Fire Station – This .47-acre property is located on the north side of San Bernardino Road, west of Archibald Avenue. The fire station is obsolete and will soon be replaced by the new Public Safety Facility nearing completion further west of this location. The site is owned by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. San Bernardino Road properties – The Fire District also owns two (2) undeveloped properties further west on San Bernardino Road: 9547 San Bernardino Road (.81 acres) and 9561 San Bernardino Road (.56 acres). Under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-54233 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City/District for which the City Council/Fire Board takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the each agency’s use. The Act provides that land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the agency may take action to dispose of it consistent with the agency’s policies or Page 156 Page 2 7 7 6 procedures. This action was taken by the City and the Fire Board through adoption of resolutions in December 2020. The Act requires that before the City Council or Fire District Board disposes of any of these properties or engages in negotiations to dispose of these properties, the City/Fire must send a written notice of availability (“NOA”) of the properties, which includes the location and a description of each property, to certain designated entities. These notices were sent on December 17, 2020. One (1) affordable housing provider, Volunteers of America Los Angeles (VOALA), responded to the NOA and expressed interest in all six (6) properties. Negotiations continued through May 16, 2021, but price and terms were not reached with VOALA for any of the City or Fire parcels. ANALYSIS: The Surplus Land Act provides that if the City/Fire does not agree to price and terms with a designated entity or if no designated entity responds to the NOA, the City/Fire can proceed to sell or lease these properties to any entity. However, as described above, if ten or more residential units are developed on a property, not less than 15% of the total residential units developed on a property must be made available at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent to low income households pursuant to a covenant recorded against the land. The proposed resolutions will approve the placements of the required covenants and restrictions on the six properties to require the development of affordable housing if ten or more residential units are developed on a property. Following adoption of the resolutions, staff will record the covenants and restrictions, and submit the required documentation to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to complete the surplus process for these parcels. FISCAL IMPACT: None. COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This action is in keeping with the Council’s vision to creating an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, by setting the stage for the appropriate, high-quality reuse of these properties in the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – City Resolution re: Haven Avenue Attachment 2 – City Resolution re: 7089 Etiwanda Avenue Attachment 3 – Fire Resolution re: 8340 Utica Attachment 4 – Fire Resolution re: 9561 San Bernardino Road Attachment 5 – Fire Resolution re: 9547 San Bernardino Road Attachment 6 – Fire Resolution re: 9612 San Bernardino Road Page 157 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of two vacant parcels at the northwest corner of Haven Avenue and Civic Center Drive, which the City is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for City work or operations after the City discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the City’s use after the City discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted Resolution 2020-131, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the City sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The City Council hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Page 158 -2- 1 2 0 2 Section 4.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 159 -3- 1 2 0 2 Exhibit A Legal Description For APN/Parcel ID(s): 0208-331-40-0-000 and 0208-331-47-0-000 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: LOT 2 OF TRACT NO. 16179, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP FILED IN BOOK 301, PAGES 34 TO 39 INCLUSIVE OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. PARCEL 2: LOTS 3 AND 4 OF TRACT MAP NO. 16179, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNADINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, PER SUBDIVISION MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 301, PAGES 34 TO 39, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY-MOST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF HAVEN AVENUE, HAVING A HALF-WIDTH OF 67 FEET, SOUTH 00° 27' 54" EAST A DISTANCE OF 209.72 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID HAVEN AVENUE, SOUTH 90° 00' 00" WEST A DISTANCE OF 129.41 FEET TO A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 378.50 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 69° 23' 02" EAST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17° 58' 07"A DISTANCE OF 118.70 FEET TO A COMPOUND CURVE, CONCAVE WESTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 50.50 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 87° 21' 09" EAST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49° 21' 01" A DISTANCE OF 43.50 FEET TO A REVERSING CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1.00 FEET, A RADIAL TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 43° 17' 50" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, NORTHERLY AND NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 88° 33' 19" A DISTANCE OF 1.55 FEET; THENCE NORTH 41° 51' 09" EAST A DISTANCE OF 16.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00° 00' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 40.99 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY Page 160 -4- 1 2 0 2 OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 4 NORTH 90° 00' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 108.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LAND IS SHOWN AND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL "B" IN THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE NO. 599 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RECORDED DECEMBER 8, 2006, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006- 0848028, OFFICIAL RECORDS. Page 161 -5- 1 2 0 2 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 162 -6- 1 2 0 2 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. City of Rancho Cucamonga). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 163 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7089 ETIWANDA AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of the Etiwanda Depot and surrounding property located at 7089 Etiwanda Avenue, which the City is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for City work or operations after the City discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the City’s use after the City discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the City Council has previously adopted Resolution 2020-130, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the City sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The City Council hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the City are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Section 4.The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 164 -2- 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc 1 2 0 3 Exhibit A Legal Description Parcel 1 of Parcel Map No19247, in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map filed in Book 238 of Parcel Maps, Pages 76 through 79, inclusive, in the office of the county recorder of said county. Except all minerals and mineral rights, interests and royalties, including without limitation, all oil, gas and other hydrocarbon substances, as well as metallic or other solid minerals of whatever kind or character, whether now known or hereafter discovered, in and under the land below a depth of 500 feet under the surface without regard to the manner in which the same may be produced or extracted from the land, but without any right to enter upon or through the surface down to 500 feet below the surface to extract, drill, explore or otherwise exploit such minerals or mineral rights and without any right to remove or impair lateral or subjacent support, as reserved in deed recorded April 19, 1991 as instrument No. 91-130996, Official Records. Page 165 -3- 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc 1 2 0 3 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 166 -4- 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc 1 2 0 3 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. City of Rancho Cucamonga). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 167 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8340 UTICA AVENUE WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 8340 Utica Avenue, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-023, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Page 168 -2- 1 2 0 4 Section 4.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 169 -3- 1 2 0 4 Exhibit A Legal Description THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. PARCEL MAP 8568 PARCEL 1 PARCEL MAP 8568 PARCEL NO 1 Page 170 -4- 1 2 0 4 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 171 -5- 1 2 0 4 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 172 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9561 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9561 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-026, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Page 173 -2- 1 2 0 5 Section 4.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 174 -3- 1 2 0 5 Exhibit A Legal Description THE WEST 76 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS, PAGE 9, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, 10 CHAINS WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORN ER THEREOF; THENCE WEST 5 CHAINS; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES NORTH 10 CHAINS, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTH LINE OF A ROAD LEADING FROM CUCAMONGA SCHOOL HOUSE TO SAN BERNARDINO; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID ROAD TO A POINT DUE NORTH OF THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT; THENCE SOUTH TO THE POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. EXCEPTING THEREFROM: (A) BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE STATE HIGHWAY, WHICH POINT IS NORTH 0° 08' WEST 30 FEET FROM A POINT WHICH IS SOUTH 89° 54' WEST 660 FEET FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 3; THENCE NORTH 0° 08' WEST 341 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89° 54' WEST 330 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0° 08' EAST 341 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89° 54' EAST 330 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (B) COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ALVIN C. BURKHOLDER, ET UX, RECORDED AUGUST 20, 1947, AS RECORDER'S DAILY INSTRUMENT NO. 35, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF A ROAD LEADING FROM CUCAMONGA SCHOOL HOUSE TO SAN BERNARDINO, 126 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; Page 175 -4- 1 2 0 5 Legal Description – Page 2 THENCE WEST ALONG SAID ROAD, 128 FEET; THENCE SOUTH AND PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID BURKHOLDER TRACT, 136 FEET; THENCE AT RIGHT ANGLES EAST 128 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT DUE SOUTH OF THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Page 176 -5- 1 2 0 5 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 177 -6- 1 2 0 5 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 178 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9547 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9547 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of January 1, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-025, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Page 179 -2- 1 2 0 6 Section 4.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 180 -3- 1 2 0 6 Exhibit A Legal Description THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, ACCORDING TO GOVERNMENT SURVEY, AS THE LINES OF SAID GOVERNMENT SURVEY MAY BE EXTENDED ACROSS THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 3, 990 FEET WEST OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND CONVEYED TO HENRY G. KLUSMAN BY DEED RECORDED JUNE 25, 1930, IN BOOK 635, PAGE(S) 117, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA; THENCE NORTH 322 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO POINT THEREON THAT IS SOUTH 324 FEET 4 INCHES FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, FOR THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE 11EST 110.64 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF PROPERTY SO CONVEYED TO KLUSMAN THAT IS SOUTH THEREON 328 FEET,5 INCHES FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 328 FEET 5 INCHES ALONG SAID WEST LINE TO SAID NORTHWEST CORNER BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAN BERNARDINO ROAD; THENCE EAST 110 FEET, MORE OR LESS, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, BEING THE NORTH LINE OF PROPERTY SO CONVEYED TO KLUSMAN,THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE SOUTH 324 FEET 4 INCHES ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PROPERTY TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.   Page 181 -4- 1 2 0 6 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 182 -5- 1 2 0 6 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 183 11231-0001\2481928v1.doc RESOLUTION NO. ______ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54233 FOR THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9612 SAN BERNARDINO ROAD WHEREAS, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (“District”) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property described in Exhibit “A,” attached hereto and made a part of hereof (“Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is vacant property located at 9612 San Bernardino Road, which the District is no longer expected to use or need as of July 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, District staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for District work or operations after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, District staff has determined that the Property is not suitable for the District’s use after the District discontinues use of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Fire Board has previously adopted Resolution FD2020-024, declaring that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the District’s use; and WHEREAS, in December of 2020 the District sent written notices of availability of the Property to certain designated entities, but negotiations did not result in the sale of the Property; NOW, THEREFORE, THE FIRE DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1.The above recitals are true and correct and are a substantive part of this Resolution. Section 2.The Fire District Board of Directors hereby approves the Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property, attached as Exhibit B. Section 3.The officers and staff of the District are hereby authorized, jointly and severally, to do all things which they may deem necessary or proper to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution, and any such actions previously taken are hereby ratified and confirmed. Such actions include negotiating in good faith in accordance with the requirements of the Act with any of the Designated Entities that submit a written notice of interest to purchase or lease the Property in compliance with the Act. Page 184 -2- 1 2 0 7 Section 4.The Clerk of the Board shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Page 185 -3- 1 2 0 7 Exhibit A Legal Description The Land referred to herein below is situated in the unincorporated area of the County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is described as follows: PARCEL "A" AS SHOWN ON CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 235, AS EVIDENCED BY DOCUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 10, 1986 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 86-261471 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP, 1 SOUTH, RANGE 7 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS THE LINES OF THE GOVERNMENT SURVEY MAY BE EXTENDED ACROSS THE CUCAMONGA RANCHO, PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, SO-CALLED, (BEING THE ROAD DESCRIBED AS LEADING EASTERLY FROM THE SCHOOL HOUSE IN CUCAMONGA) 488 FEET WEST FROM THE WEST LINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE 150 FEET; THENCE WEST PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD, 126.72 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WEST LINE OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO JOHN D. MAC PHERSON AND WIFE, BY DEED DATED APRIL 5, 1945 AND RECORDED APRIL 21, 1945, IN BOOK 1763, PAGE 282 OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 0° 10’ WEST, 150 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID MAC PHERSON LAND; THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF OLD SAN BERNARDINO ROAD TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THE WEST 30 FEET THEREOF FOR ROAD PURPOSES. For conveyancing purposes only: APN 0208-131-83 Page 186 -4- 1 2 0 7 Exhibit B COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY (per Government Code Section 54233) These COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR REAL PROPERTY is executed as of June 2, 2021, by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District ("Owner"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, California as is described in the legal description in the attached and incorporated Exhibit A ("the Property"); WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 1486 amended the Surplus Land Act (Government Code Section 54220 et. seq.) and created new obligations before a local agency may dispose of surplus land; WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act designates the California State Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") with oversight with respect to a local agency's compliance with the Surplus Land Act; and WHEREAS, HCD requires that certain affordability covenants and restrictions be recorded against surplus land as set forth in Government Code Section 54233 prior to its disposition. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the Owner declares as follows: A. If ten (10) or more residential units are developed on the property described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto then not less than 15 percent of the total number of residential units developed on the property shall be sold or rented at an affordable housing cost, as defined in Section 50052.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, or affordable rent, as defined in Section 50053 of the California Health and Safety Code, to lower-income households, as defined in Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code. Rental units shall remain affordable to and occupied by lower-income households for a period of 55 years for rental housing and 45 years for ownership housing. The initial occupants of all ownership units shall be lower-income households, and the units shall be subject to an equity sharing agreement consistent with the provisions of paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of 65915 of the California Government Code. B. These requirements shall be covenants and restrictions running with the land and shall be enforceable against any owner who violates a covenant or restriction and each successor-in- interest who continues the violation by any of the entities described in subdivisions (a) to (f), inclusive, of Section 54222.5 of the California Government Code. Page 187 -5- 1 2 0 7 C. The Restrictions and Covenants set forth herein are intended not to merge into the Owner's fee simple title to the Property, but become effective when the Property is conveyed by the current Owner (i.e. Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District). IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Covenants and Restrictions for Real Property to be signed by its duly authorized representatives, as of the day and year first above written. OWNER: RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT John Gillison, City Manager ATTEST: Page 188 SUBJECT: Public Hearing for Consideration of a Resolution Denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018- 00534 – Alan Smith for Arbor Express Carwash – A Request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to Change the Land Use and Zoning Designation for One Project-Specific Parcel of Land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for Two Non-Project Specific Adjacent Parcels of Land (0208- 291-01 and 0208-291-02) From Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District Related to an Approved Carwash Located Approximately 200 Feet East of Archibald Avenue on the North Side of Arrow Route. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-045) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council: 1. Adopt Resolution No. 2021-045 denying General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. BACKGROUND: On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission voted 4-1 to approve Design Review DRC2018- 00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 for the site plan, design review, and operation of a 5,078 square foot carwash and 1,296 square foot detailing center on 1.36 acres of land. The Planning Commission also recommended City Council approval of the Related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments. One Planning Commissioner voted in opposition to the project based on their determination that a carwash and detailing center were not the highest and best use for the project site. A timeline for this project is attached as Attachment 3. Correspondence received by Applicant supporting their request is attached as Attachment 5. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The “L” shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Page 189 Page 2 7 1 7 parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). A non-operational service station is located on the parcel of land to the west of the project site, at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved the reactivation of this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and Zoning Map (DRC2015-00684 amendments changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: ANALYSIS: Tonight, staff will present the arguments for why a general plan amendment is not recommended at this location at this time. Context In order to execute and utilize the conditional use permit approved by the Planning Commission for Arbors Car Wash at the subject (project) location, the general plan amendment being considered by the City Council tonight is required, as well as a corresponding zone map amendment. This is needed specifically to redesignate the land use on the easternmost parcel from residential to commercial. The review process for a project which requires a general plan amendment, admittedly, seems to take place in reverse order. That is, the Design Review Committee’s review of the site and architectural design was completed first. Then, the Planning Commission review of the conditional use permit for the car wash proposal itself was completed second. Both of these Land Use General Plan Zoning Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Site Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District South Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District (2-4 du/acre) East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation Page 190 Page 3 7 1 7 reviews and decisions took place prior to the City Council consideration of the general plan amendment that is needed to make the two prior recommendations and approvals legally valid. This is awkward because the largest policy question – whether or not the underlying last use should change – isn't decided until the project has already been studied and processed by staff and the Planning Commission. However, to take a general plan amendment forward without understanding the merits of the proposed use, and whether the project can even be approved is also not the most viable sequence of events. The merits of a specific project help to inform the decision on the amendment. Issue 1: Importance of the General Plan Land Use Element and Map to the Planning Process An amendment to the general plan from one land use type to another is a weighty decision that should not be taken lightly. The State mandated 2010 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan is the City’s legislative document that guides land use and development decisions with a long-range view in mind. Many cities call their general plan the “road map” or the “constitution” for the city. Typically, a general plan amendment is appropriate when a project will advance a significant and important goal of the City that could not be met without the amendment. Given the City Council’s recent discussions about fiscal performance of land, you might consider a redesignation that would allow for a larger development footprint for a high-performing use. Or you might consider a new designation to accommodate a needed public facility or beneficial affordable housing project. Staff analysis: The City Council should only amend the General Plan when such amendment furthers clear and important goals of the City. The establishment of a new car wash does not rise to this level. There is no documented shortage of car wash facilities in Rancho Cucamonga at this time. Car wash facilities do not further the City’s economic development goals. Issue 2: The General Plan is a legislative document and is amended by legislative action The adoption and amendment of a general plan is a legislative action. It is the prerogative of the City Council to make the decision whether or not to amend the General Plan for any reason based on policy goals. The request before the City Council tonight does not require project level findings like those required for discretionary permits such as a conditional use permit. Staff analysis: The applicant for this general plan amendment has understood that the project approval relies on the legislative action being considered tonight and has been willing to continue this process in spite of the risk that the general plan amendment might not be approved. Issue 3: Legal Limit on the Number of General Plan Amendments As a way of signifying the importance and sanctity of the long-range planning process, State law limits the number of general plan amendments a City can approve to four a year. For 2021, the City has multiple general plan amendments under way: three major industrial projects will require general plan amendments in order to calibrate zoning designations for very large sites and the PlanRC comprehensive General Plan update and Housing Element. In the absence of any other requests, these projects alone will utilize all four of the City’s allowed amendments. Staff analysis: Car wash is not a land use that warrants the consideration of one of a limited number of allowable general plan amendments. The City Council previously implemented a moratorium on the car wash use to amend the standards for new car wash uses, which are predominantly in District 2, thereby requiring a higher level of scrutiny to approve. Further, the Page 191 Page 4 7 1 7 City Council recently established a moratorium on service station uses, which are also predominantly in District 2, to establish more regulations and performance standards for this auto- oriented use. These recent measures to further study and restrict auto-related uses, both of which have historically dominated the economic development of District 2, indicate the opposite of a justification of a general plan amendment for a car wash. Further, should the City Council approve the car wash General Plan, it will be unable to approve a General Plan Amendment for one of the major industrial projects (all of which are 500,000 SF to 1,500,000 sf and represent hundreds of millions of dollars of investment and thousands of jobs) unless that project is held for 3-4 months until 2022 or could result in a delay to the update of the City’s Housing Element and General Plan, impacting the City’s ability to regulate new commercial, industrial, and housing developments. Issue 4: PlanRC Comprehensive General Plan Update The City began a two-year comprehensive General Plan update in January 2020. When adopted, this new long-range vision for future land use development will close the chapter on the 2010 General Plan, and establish a vision for the next ten or more years. Extensive community outreach was conducted through meetings, discussion groups and surveys to better understand the community’s land use and development goals. The public review draft of the Land Use Plan reflects the goals articulated by the community. It has been released in draft form prior to public hearings and adoption, which are scheduled to take place in Fall 2021. The draft Land Use Plan indicates that the Archibald and Arrow intersection, including the subject property is intended to be designated “Neighborhood Corridor.” At this time, this designation discourages auto- dependent land uses in favor of commercial businesses that serve the local community and can be accessed without requiring an automobile. In addition, this commercial corner is adjacent to the proposed Cucamonga Town Center Focus Area, which envisions enhanced commercial and industrial uses at a walkable, neighborhood scale. There are other locations in the City which are identified as potential locations for any increased demand in auto-related uses that might result from a growing residential population. Staff analysis: The community’s future land use vision for Arrow and Archibald neighborhood, as proposed in the draft PlanRC Land Plan does not include auto-related uses. The General Plan update community engagement effort indicated the community greatly desires walkable, destination oriented retail developments. The subject property will no longer be designated as LM Residential but is not proposed to accommodate a car wash use in the future designation either. As the comprehensive General Plan update is in process, staff asserts that this amendment to a single parcel of land is not timely. A project that is compliant with the current land use and zoning designation could be considered, but any reconsideration of land use on these parcels should only be considered as part of the comprehensive update. Issue 5: Redesignating Land Use from Residential to Commercial In 2017 the California Legislature approved California’s 2017 Housing Package, which, among other housing bills, included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need. Page 192 Page 5 7 1 7 The City may only reduce or eliminate residential density for a parcel if there is a sufficient replacement of residentially zoned land so that there is “no net loss” of residential development capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City’s regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity as a result of this project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations for two non-project related parcels (APNs: 208- 29-01 and -02) as described previously. The subject 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 vs 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will, in turn, make the project compliant with the “no net loss” provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). Staff analysis: This is the one area this general plan amendment would conform to – it would meet the requirements of SB 166 as it would not result in a net loss of potential housing. Issue 6: Car Wash Use Adjacent to Low or Medium Density Residential Housing As stated in Issue 5, the General Plan Amendment requested would require a re-designation and re-zoning of the adjacent property to the east to a higher density residential land use and zone. If developed to its full potential, these residential properties would be located immediately adjacent to a car wash use. The noise of equipment, vehicles, and patrons at the site during operating hours as well as the environmental conditions of water spraying and air blowing, while not found to have significant environmental impacts under CEQA, with mitigation, are still conditions that are not ideal in a residential neighborhood. Staff analysis: Car wash uses are not compatible with residential neighborhoods. There are many other locations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga where a car wash could be located at a much further distance away from neighboring residences. Summary In summary, staff cannot recommend a general plan amendment to accommodate the development of a car wash due to the lack of consistency with the City’s current and future land use goals, the lack of a demonstrated need for the use, and the lack of a clear community benefit that would be achieved by the project as well as the impact on other, larger projects currently in process. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $4,862 to the City upon completion Page 193 Page 6 7 1 7 of the project. This figure has not been peer-reviewed or confirmed. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The request to make an amendment for a single property and for this proposed development project does not meet the Council Goals of completing a comprehensive General Plan and Development Code Update. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on April 28, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (135 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on April 28, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Attachment 1 - Planning Commission Staff Report Dated March 10, 2021 Attachment 2 - Planning Commission Minutes Dated March 10, 2021 Attachment 3 - Correspondence Received Attachment 4 - Draft Resolution No. 2021-045 Attachment 5 - Project Timeline Page 194 SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2018-00533, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT DRC2018- 00534, DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2018-00536, & TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2019-00218 -ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center, General Plan and Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, a Conditional Use Permit to operate a carwash, and a Tree Removal Permit for a 1.36-acre project site in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre), located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-01, -02, -03 and -06. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following action: •Approve Design Review DRC2018-00535, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536, and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. •Recommend City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 through the adoption of the attached Resolutions of Approval with Conditions. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The project scope is for the site plan and architectural review of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center. Project approval is contingent on the approval of related General Plan/Zoning Map amendments to change the land use and zoning designation of one of two parcels that makes up the project site from a residential land use/zoning designation (Low Medium (LM)) to a commercial land use/zoning designation (General Commercial(GC)). Based on the State of California’s “no- net-loss” requirement, the loss of potential residential development on the one project DATE: March 10, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Attachment 1Page195 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00219 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 related parcel of land, requires that loss to be made up on other parcels in the city. The project includes rezoning two adjacent parcels of land to a higher residential density to make up for the lost potential residential units on the project site. PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The “L” shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located on the parcel of land to the west of the project site, at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved the reactivation of this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and Zoning Map (DRC2015-00684 amendments changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: ANALYSIS: A. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a carwash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,078 square foot automated “express” car wash, and a separate Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District (2-4 du/acre) East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 du/acre) West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation Page 196 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 1,296 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The existing single- family residence on the project site will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The first floor of the carwash building is comprised of an enclosed carwash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 roll-up service doors, an office area, and a restroom. Three separate shaded canopies will be provided in the parking lot area with individual self-service vacuums, totaling 32 stalls along with 8 customer/employee parking stalls. The carwash is designed to recycle 86 percent of the wash water. Development Code Section 17.90.030-E (Drive-In and Drive-Through Uses) states that drive-through lanes are required to be set back 45 feet from the ultimate curb face and 300 feet from an intersection. Development Code Section 17.90.030 allows for deviations from the above provisions through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review. The development standards that apply to the project are as follows: Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 40 parking spaces. Land Use Required Parking Provided Parking Car Wash/ Detail Center 16 Stalls 40 Stalls Development Criteria Minimum Requirement Proposed Compliant? Building Setback (along Arrow Route) 45 feet 78 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback (from Street) 45 feet 45 feet Yes Drive-Through Setback (Intersection) 300 feet 190 feet No* Rear Building Setback (at north property line) 0 feet 60 feet Yes Side Building Setback (at east property line) 20 feet 20 feet Yes Side Building Setback (at west property line) 5 feet 100 feet Yes Parking Setback (along Arrow Route) 25 feet 50 Feet Yes Landscape Setback 45 feet (average)/ 30 feet (minimum) 45 Feet Yes Landscape Coverage 10 percent 26 Percent Yes Floor Area Ratio 35 percent (maximum) 11 Percent Yes * Deviations to these provisions may be considered through the issuance of a site plan and architectural review permit. Page 197 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 Access to the site will be provided by a 40-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the carwash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The carwash and detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of-way. B. General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2019-00534: The project includes a request for General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments to change the General Plan land use and zoning designations for one parcel of land (APN: 0208-291- 03) within the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, and for two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APNs: 0208-291-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM)/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M)/Medium (M) Residential District, respectively. In 2017 the California Legislature approved California’s 2017 Housing Package, which, among other housing bills, included Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). SB 166 prohibits a City from reducing, requiring, or permitting a reduction of the residential density to a lower residential density that is below the density that was used by the California Department of Housing and Community Development in determining compliance with housing element law, unless the City makes written findings supported by substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent with the General Plan, including the housing element, and that the remaining sites identified in the housing element are adequate to accommodate the City’s share of the regional housing need. The City may only reduce or eliminate residential density for a parcel if there is a sufficient replacement of residentially zoned land so that there is “no net loss” of residential development capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City’s regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity as a result of this project, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use and zoning designations for two non-project related parcels (APNs: 208-29-01 and -02) as described previously. Page 198 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 5 The subject 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 vs 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will, in turn, make the project compliant with the “no net loss” provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166). The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments will also be compatible with the existing and future land uses surrounding the project site. The proposed car wash is designed to minimize potential impacts on the surrounding land uses. The vehicle entrance to the car wash will be shared with the adjacent service station and will be approximately 270 feet from the nearest residential land use. Noise making equipment related to the car wash and vacuum stations will be located within an enclosed equipment room, reducing noise levels below the maximum noise levels permitted for a residential land use. The car wash building will be positioned on a north-south axis, further reducing any potential noise or light impacts on the surrounding residential land uses. The existing Mulberry Early Education Center located to the north of the project site will provide a buffer between the proposed carwash and the existing single-family uses further to the north. The proposed General Commercial designation is compatible with the General Commercial designation to the south. The proposed General Plan and Zoning Map amendments increasing the permitted residential density of the non-project related parcel to the east will also not impact the continued use of the existing single-family residence (Beverly Hills House) for residential purposes. Additionally, the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states “Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate.” The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population’s carwash needs and will support the surrounding community’s needs as Arrow Route is identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states “Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas.” The development of a car wash on the two project-related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. C. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536: Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the proposed General Commercial (GC) District, car washes are a Page 199 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 6 permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed carwash will employ approximately 25 full and part-time employees with 7 persons on the largest shift for both the carwash and detail center. The facility will operate 7 days per week from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. with customers staying in their vehicle during the car washing and drying process. Complimentary self-serve vacuums will be available upon exiting the carwash tunnel. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code, Municipal Code, General Plan, and any applicable Specific Plans or City regulations/standards. Fact: The proposed project includes amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Map to change the land use designation and zoning of one of the parcels that make up the project site from Low Medium (LM)/ Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC)/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. Within the General Commercial (GC) District, carwashes are a permitted land use subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The proposed car wash is compliant with each of the applicable development standards of the Development Code. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. Fact: The project site is suitable for a car wash land use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for a carwash facility. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. Fact: Subject to the approval of the related General Plan and Zoning Map Amendments, the establishment of the carwash facility will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. The project was designed to meet all applicable Development Code standards, performance criteria, and can be conditioned appropriately to minimize any potential impacts to adjacent properties. D. Tree Removal Permit (DRC2019-00218): The project includes a request for the removal of 17 trees. An Arborist Report (Steve Anderson, Arborist) was submitted that reviews the health and condition of the 17 onsite trees. The report concludes that based on poor health and improper pruning all the onsite trees are recommended for removal. The removed trees will be replaced by 42 new trees as part of the proposed project. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on December 17, 2019. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised three design issues: 1) the use of Page 200 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 7 stone veneer on the east elevation of the carwash building; 2) the addition of stone veneer on the vacuum housing bases; and 3) the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures. The committee recommended that stone veneer be added to the east elevation of the carwash building and that stone veneer not be added to the bases of the vacuum housing bases. The committee was also accepting of the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures rather than real wood. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. The plans before the Planning Commission have been updated to reflect the recommendations by the Design Review Committee. F. Neighborhood Meeting: The applicant held a neighborhood meeting at the RC Family Resource Center on April 29, 2019. Owners of property located within 660 feet of the project site were notified and invited to attend the meeting. No property owners / residents attended the meeting. G. Public Art: The project is subject to the public art requirement and will be required to provide public art on the project site with a minimum value of $6,374 or pay an in-lieu fee to the City’s public art fund, equal to the minimum value of art that would otherwise be included in the development project. A condition has been included pursuant to the Development Code that requires the public art requirement to be met prior to occupancy. H. SB18 and AB52 Tribal Consultation: In accordance with Senate Bill 18 (SB18), notification was sent on October 16, 2018, to tribal communities from a list of seven tribes provided by the Native American Heritage Commission. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and the Morongo Band of Mission Indians) and requested any cultural studies that were prepared for the studies. The studies were forwarded to the two tribes and no further comment was received. Notification in accordance with AB52 was sent on April 1, 2019, to tribal communities from a list of six tribes that have requested notification by the City. Two tribes responded (San Manuel Band of Mission Indians and Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation). The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested in writing that language be incorporated into the final CEQA document requiring notification if cultural resources are found. The Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kitz Nation requested that mitigation measures be included in the CEQA documents requiring an onsite tribal monitor during earthmoving actives. The CEQA document prepared for the project reflects the requested language/mitigation measures. I. Environmental Assessment: Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project was prepared by MIG, Inc and was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review the report. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, City staff determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. The mitigation measures that the applicant will be required to comply with will reduce potential impacts to migratory birds, cultural and Tribal cultural resources, and reduce noise impacts during the project's construction, as well as potential impacts that may be created upon operation of the development, such as traffic-related impacts. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. No comments Page 201 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 8 were received during the public comment period. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has also been prepared to ensure implementation of, and compliance with, the mitigation measures for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact Analysis (Stanley R. Hoffman Associates) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide a net annual recurring impact of $4,862 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. New recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrast ructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. COUNCIL GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The project fulfills City Core Value #7 (Continuous Improvement) by redeveloping two underutilized parcels of land. The project is also consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and the objectives of the Development Code. The proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan Land Use element and its policies related to serving local needs and promoting complementary development. The proposed car wash will complement the approved reestablishment of the existing service station to the west and is designed to minimize any impact on the surrounding land uses. PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION OPTIONS: 1. Approve the Design Review and Conditional Use Permit for the proposed carwash as presented and recommend City Council approval of the related General Plan land use/ Zoning Map amendments. 2. Recommend that the City Council deny the proposed General Plan land use and Zoning Map amendments along with the related entitlements based on the determination that redesignating a residential property to commercial at this location is not consistent with the City’s land use goals pursuant to the General Plan. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular page legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper, the property was posted on February 3, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners (143 addresses) within a 660-foot radius of the project site on February 2, 2021. To date, no comments/correspondence has been received in response to these notifications. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Aerial Photo Showing Project Location Exhibit B - Complete Set of Plans Page 202 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT GPA DRC2018-00533, ZMA DRC2018-00534, DR DRC2018-00535, CUP DRC2018-00536 & TRP DRC2019-00218 ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit C - Business Operation Letter Exhibit D - Design Review Committee Comments (December 17, 2019) and Action Agenda Exhibit E - Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Plan Draft Resolution 21-15 Recommending Approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533 Draft Resolution 21-16 Recommending Approval of Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534 Draft Resolution 21-14 of Approval for Design Review DRC2018-00535 Draft Resolution 21-12 of Approval for Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 Draft Resolution 21-13 of Approval for Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 Page 203 Exhibit A Page 204 Exhibit B Page 205 &nbsp;&nbsp;Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Tabe van der Zwaag December 17, 2019 DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Site Characteristics and Background: The project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres of land (59,300 square feet) located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue. The “L” shaped project site is approximately 266 feet (east to west), and approximately 280 feet and 170 feet (north to south) along the east and west property lines, respectively. The westernmost parcel of land that makes up the project site is vacant (APN: 0209-291-06) and the easternmost parcel is developed with a single-family residence (APN: 0208-291-03). The existing elevation is approximately 1,152 feet (above sea level) at the northeast corner of the project site and 1,150 feet along the south property line, for a grade change of approximately 2 feet. A non-operational service station is located to the west of the project site at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route. On August 15, 2018, the City Council approved a project to reactivate this service station (Design Review DRC2015-00682). That approval included the design review of a drive-through automatic carwash to be located on the east side of the existing service station along with General Plan land use (DRC2015-00683) and zoning map amendments (DRC2015-00684), changing the General Plan land use and zoning designations from Low Medium/Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial/General Commercial (GC) District, respectively. The land use and zoning amendments for that project included one of the two parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-06) that comprise the subject project site. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-02; Exhibit D Page 219 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 2 Staff Summary and Design Review Committee Responsibility: In addition to the entitlement requests for a Design Review, the subject application also includes requests for a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment in order to alter land-use policy to accommodate the proposed use. Zoning map amendments and general plan amendments are legislative actions that establish City policy and require City Council review. These high-level legislative actions are typically intended to achieve some type of substantial public benefit. Generally, staff is not able to identify any such substantial public benefit which justifies a zoning map amendment and general plan amendment for this project. Staffs overriding concern with the project is thus whether the carwash land use is appropriate for the proposed location. The development review process, though, places the DRC review of the onsite structures prior to Planning Commission review of the higher-level land use policy issues. The DRC is, therefore, being asked to review the design of a project for which staff is unable to support the related entitlements. Consequently, subsequent reports to the Planning Commission and City Council will provide a thorough analysis of the appropriateness of the zoning map amendment and the general plan amendment. Along with the above-outlined concerns related to the land-use changes, staff has also identified a number of project-related technical deficiencies. Development Code Section 17.90.030 provides the Planning Commission with the flexibility to permit deviations from these provisions through the development review process or through the approval of Variances. As such, the DRC is not expected to offer recommendations based on staff’s concerns regarding the proposed zoning map amendment/general plan amendment or technical deficiencies. Rather, the DRC is being requested to review the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the full Planning Commission for consideration of each of the project entitlements and the outstanding technical issues. Project Overview: The applicant proposes to construct and operate a car wash facility consisting of a two-story, 5,865 square automated “express” car wash, a separate 1,428 square foot detailing center along with shaded vacuum canopies. The first floor of the car wash building is comprised of an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, an enclosed mechanical equipment room, restrooms, office area, cashier, and storage area. The second floor is comprised of an equipment room, office, and restrooms. The separate one-story car detailing building will consist of an open floor area with 3 rollup service doors, office area, and restroom. The existing single-family residence noted above will be removed as part of the development of the proposed project. The car detailing center will be a separate service from the automated car wash. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be located in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 13 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible parking stall. Development Code Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) states that carwashes with a detail center are required to provide 16 total parking spaces. The project will include a total of 45 parking spaces. Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This driveway will be shared with the approved service station/carwash to the west. Access to the carwash will be through three carwash drive-through lanes with individual automated cashier pay stations and barrier gate arms. Upon exiting the car 2 – Not in operation but approved for reactivation Page 220 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 3 wash tunnel, vehicles will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. Vehicles will exit the facility via the shared driveway on Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route. The vehicles in the drive-through lanes will be screened from Arrow Route by landscaping. The car wash and car detailing center will have a Tuscan architectural design theme comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the Arrow Route street right-of- way. Staff Comments: Staff has identified the following design issues that the applicant should address prior to the project moving forward to the Planning Commission for full review of the project: 1. The west elevation (front) of the car wash building includes a stone veneer on the tower elements. The east elevation (rear) includes similar tower elements without the use of the stone veneer. It is recommended that the east building elevation be updated to include stone veneer on each of the tower elements along with a similar gable treatment as that used on the west elevation. The City has a policy requiring 360-degree architecture carrying architectural details to all elevations. 2. Update the supports of the vacuum shade canopies to include a stone veneer base to carry over the stone veneer used on the on-site buildings. 3. The overhead lattice arbors and the lattice cover over the trash enclosures are currently called out to be constructed of “alumawood,” which is not appropriate for a commercial development. It is recommended that the “alumawood” be replaced with wood. Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of the Committee discussion regarding this project. 1. None Secondary Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. 1. Design Issues – Visual enhancement of the rear side of the main car wash building, stone veneer bases on the vacuum canopies and the use of wood rather than “alumawood” for the overhead trellises. Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. Page 221 DRC COMMENTS DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH December 17, 2019 Page 4 1. The project is subject to the public art requirement per Development Code Chapter 17.124. 2. All ground-mounted equipment and utility boxes, including transformers, back-flow devices, etc., shall be screened by a minimum of two rows of shrubs spaced a minimum of 18 inches on center. This equipment shall be painted dark green. 3. All Double Detector Checks (DDCs) and Fire Department Connections (FDCs) shall be screened on three sides by 4-foot high walls. The walls shall incorporate the design and materials used on the on-site buildings. 4. Decorative paving shall be provided at all vehicular access points onto the site. 5. All doors (roll-up, dock doors, emergency access) shall be painted to match the color of the adjacent wall or glass panel. 6. All trash enclosures shall be constructed per City standard. The design of the trash enclosures shall incorporate the materials, finish, color, and trim used on the buildings. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee consider the outstanding design issues and forward the project to the Planning Commission for review of the overall project and the related entitlements. Design Review Committee Action: Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Michael Smith Page 222 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 1 of 3 A. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Diane Williams x Tony M. Guglielmo Mike Smith x Alternates: Bryan Dopp Francisco Oaxaca x Additional Staff Present: Tabe van der Zwaag. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS This is the time and place for the general public to address the Committee on any item listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Committee from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Committee may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Staff Coordinator, depending upon the number of individuals members of the audience. This is a professional businessmeeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. C. PROJECT REVIEW ITEMS The following items will be presented by the applicant and/or their representatives. Each presentation and resulting period of Committee comment is limited to 20 minutes. Following each presentation, the Committee will address major issues and make recommendations with respect to the project proposal. The Design Review Committee acts as an advisory Committee to the Planning Commission. Their recommendations will be forwarded to the Planning Commission as applicable. The following items do not legally require any public testimony, although the Committee may open the meeting for public input. C1. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00590 – SHEAN KIM FOR XEBEC REALTY- A request for site plan and architectural review of a 103,945 square foot warehouse distribution building Page 223 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 2 of 3 on 4.75 acres of land in the General Industrial (GI) District on the east side of Pecan Avenue south of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-171-02. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C2. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2019-00381 – KEN KANG – A request for site plan and architectural review for the reconstruction and expansion of a service station and convenience store located in the Mixed-Use (MU) District and Foothill Boulevard Overlay District Subarea 1 at the northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive, at 8166 Foothill Boulevard; APN: 0207-112-20 and 23. Related Record: Conditional Use Permit DRC2018- 00936. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City’s CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved as presented and forwarded to the Planning Commission for their review. C3. DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH FOR ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH - A request for site plan and architectural review of a 5,865 square foot car wash and 1,428 square foot car detailing center on 1.36 acres of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and Low Medium (LM) Residential District, located approximately 200 feet east of Archibald Avenue on the north side of Arrow Route - APN: 0209-291-03 and -06 (along with APN: 0209-291-01 and 02 for the related General Plan/Zoning Map Amendments). Related records: General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018- 00534, and Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review committee. The project was approved with the Committee recommending that stone veneer be added to the carwash building tower elements on the east elevation. The Committee was also accepting of the use of “alumawood” on the trellis structures rather than real wood and not requiring stone veneer to be added to the bases of the vacuum canopies. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. Page 224 DECEMBER 17, 2019 - 7:00 P.M. ACTION DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE AGENDA RAINS ROOM CITY HALL 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Page 3 of 3 If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the Planning Department at (909) 477-2750. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. D. ADJOURNMENT 7:45pm The Design Review Committee has adopted Administrative Regulations that set an 11:00 p.m. adjournment time. If items go beyond that time, they shall be heard only with the consent of the Committee. I, Elizabeth Thornhill, Executive Assistant, of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on Thursday, December 12, 2019 at least seventy two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA. Page 225 December 9, 2020 To: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 From: Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst MIG, Inc 1650 Spruce Street, Suite 102 Riverside, CA 92507 Subject: Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project Dear Mr. van der Zwaag: On Tuesday November 24, 2020, City staff met (via Zoom) with representatives of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (Project) located on two contiguous parcels at 9744 (Parcel 1) and 9760 (Parcel 2) Arrow Route in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City). This Memorandum provides a brief Project background, details the proceedings of the November 24, 2020 meeting, and documents the direction given by the City pertaining to preparation of the Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the proposed Project. In attendance at this meeting were: Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Alan Smith, Project Applicant; Paige Gosney, Applicant’s Counsel; and Pam Steele, Bob Prasse, and Cameron Hile, MIG. The Project includes development of a new automated car wash building and a separate detail center building along with associated parking, landscaping, and car wash system appurtenances on Parcels 1 and 2. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Draft IS/MND that was prepared for the Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25, 2020 and ending August 12, 2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) and 9872 Arrow Route (Parcel 4) from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. As shown in the table below, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), Parcel 2 (0.85 acres), Parcel 3 (0.43 acres), and Parcel 4 (0.79 acres) currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4- 8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore, this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. Page 226 2 Parcel # 2 3 4 Existing Zoning (Low Medium) Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Proposed Zoning (Medium) Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units The purpose of the November 24, 2020 meeting with City staff was to discuss the redesignation of Parcels 3 and 4 and for the City to provide direction on how best to implement this change for the CEQA review. The City directed the applicant to generate a Final IS/MND to include the additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4 in the Project Description and in discussions of the Project Description throughout the document. The City further indicated that there is no need to include additional analysis regarding Parcels 3 and 4 in the Final IS/MND or to recirculate the revised document for another public review period. The basis for this approach is that there is no specific development proposal for Parcels 3 and 4 at this time, and any such future proposal will be subject to a full environmental review in compliance with CEQA and the CEQA guidelines. The Final IS/MND, dated December 9, 2020 and included as an attachment to this memorandum, reflects the approach and direction provided by City staff as described above. The Final IS/MND shows revisions made to the Draft IS/MND with strikethrough for deleted text and underline for added text. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me at cameronh@migcom.com or call my cell phone at (626) 840-7719. Best Regards, Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst, MIG Inc. Page 227 3 Attachment 1 Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Page 228 Arbor Express Car Wash Final Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Lead Agency: City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 Prepared for: Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite #106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 Prepared by: MIG, Inc. 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 December 9, 2020 Page 229 - This document is designed for double-sided printing - Page 230 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) i Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 1  1.1 – Purpose of CEQA .................................................................................................................................. 1  1.2 – Project Background and Purpose of the Final IS/MND .......................................................................... 2  2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................................... 4  2.1 – Project Title ............................................................................................................................................ 4  2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address .......................................................................................................... 4  2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number ...................................................................................................... 4  2.4 – Project Location ..................................................................................................................................... 4  2.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address ................................................................................................... 4  2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation ...................................................................................................... 4  2.7 – Zoning District ........................................................................................................................................ 5  2.8 – Project Description ................................................................................................................................. 5  2.9 – Surrounding Land Uses ......................................................................................................................... 8  2.10 – Environmental Setting ............................................................................................................................ 9  2.11 – Required Approvals ............................................................................................................................... 9  2.12 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required ................................................................................ 9   3 Determination ........................................................................................................................................................... 21  3.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ......................................................................................... 21  3.2 – Determination ....................................................................................................................................... 21  4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ........................................................................................................................ 23  4.1 – Aesthetics ............................................................................................................................................ 23  4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources ........................................................................................................ 26  4.3 – Air Quality ............................................................................................................................................ 28  4.4 – Biological Resources ........................................................................................................................... 34  4.5 – Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 37  4.6 – Geology and Soils ................................................................................................................................ 43  4.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................................ 46  4.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................................................................... 50  4.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................................................... 54  4.10 – Land Use and Planning ........................................................................................................................ 58  4.11 – Mineral Resources ............................................................................................................................... 60  4.12 – Noise .................................................................................................................................................... 61  4.13 – Population and Housing ....................................................................................................................... 69  4.14 – Public Services .................................................................................................................................... 70  4.15 – Recreation ............................................................................................................................................ 72  4.16 – Transportation and Traffic .................................................................................................................... 73  4.17 – Tribal Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 83  4.18 – Utilities and Service Systems ............................................................................................................... 86  4.19 – Mandatory Findings of Significance ..................................................................................................... 90  5 Mitigation Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 93  6 References ............................................................................................................................................................... 99  6.1 – List of Preparers ................................................................................................................................... 99  6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted ................................................................................................. 99  6.3 – Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................... 100  Page 231 Table of Contents Initial Study ii Appendices Appendix A Air Quality/GHG Modeling Data Appendix B Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment Appendix C Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Appendix D Roadway Construction Noise Modeling Data Appendix E Noise Study Appendix F Vibration Calculations Appendix G Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix H Infiltration Testing Report List of Tables Table 1 Residential Density Capacity ....................................................................................................................................... 5  Table 2 Construction Schedule ................................................................................................................................................. 8  Table 3 Surrounding Land Uses ............................................................................................................................................... 9  Table 4 RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions ..................................................................................................... 29  Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status .................................................................................................................. 29  Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) .................................................................................... 30  Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions (lbs/day) ...................................................................................................... 31  Table 8 Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day) ................................................................................ 32  Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................ 47  Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................................ 48  Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory .................................................................................................... 48  Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements .................................................................................................... 63  Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels ...................................................................................................................... 63  Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Required ...................................................................................................... 64  Table 15 Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) ............................................................................................................. 66  Table 16 Operational Noise Levels (dBA) ............................................................................................................................... 66  Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria ........................................................................................................ 67  Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria ................................................................................................... 67  Table 19 Construction Vibration Impacts ................................................................................................................................ 68  Table 20 Existing (2018) Conditions ....................................................................................................................................... 75  Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary ........................................................................................................................... 76  Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions .................................................................. 77  Table 23 Opening Day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions ............................................. 78  Table 24 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ..................................................................................................... 79  Table 25 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions .......................................................................................................... 79  List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map.............................................................................................................................................. 11  Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map.................................................................................................................................................. 13  Exhibit 3 Site Plan ................................................................................................................................................................... 15  Exhibit 4 Floor Plans ............................................................................................................................................................... 17  Exhibit 5 Elevations ................................................................................................................................................................ 19  Page 232 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 1 1 Introduction The City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) received an application for Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit from Southwest Design Group (Project Proponent) for the construction and operation of an automated car wash and detail center (Project) on a 1.36-acre site consisting of two parcels in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to one of the two parcels on which the car wash will be developed in order to bring the site into compliance with the Zoning Code. The application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels to the east of the Project site to provide higher housing density. The approval of the application of the car wash development as well as the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change constitutes a project that is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 1970 (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§ 15000, et. seq.). This Initial Study was prepared to assess the short-term, long-term, and cumulative environmental impacts that could result from the Project. This report was prepared to comply with CEQA Guidelines § 15063, which sets forth the required contents of an Initial Study. These include:  A description of the Project, including the location of the Project (See Section 2);  Identification of the environmental setting (See Section 2.11);  Identification of environmental effects by use of a checklist, matrix, or other methods, provided that entries on the checklist or other form are briefly explained to indicate that there is some evidence to support the entries (See Section 4);  Discussion of ways to mitigate significant effects identified, if any (See Section 4);  Examination of whether the Project is compatible with existing zoning, plans, and other applicable land use controls (See Section 4.10); and  The name(s) of the person(s) who prepared or participated in the preparation of the Initial Study (See Section 5). 1.1 – Purpose of CEQA CEQA § 21000 of the California Public Resources Code provides as follows: The Legislature finds and declares as follows: a) The maintenance of a quality environment for the people of this state now and in the future is a matter of statewide concern. b) It is necessary to provide a high-quality environment that at all times is healthful and pleasing to the senses and intellect of man. c) There is a need to understand the relationship between the maintenance of high-quality ecological systems and the general welfare of the people of the state, including their enjoyment of the natural resources of the state. d) The capacity of the environment is limited, and it is the intent of the Legislature that the government of the state take immediate steps to identify any critical thresholds for the health and safety of the people of the state and take all coordinated actions necessary to prevent such thresholds being reached. e) Every citizen has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. f) The interrelationship of policies and practices in the management of natural resources and waste disposal requires systematic and concerted efforts by public and private interests to enhance environmental quality and to control environmental pollution. g) It is the intent of the Legislature that all agencies of the state government which regulate activities of private individuals, corporations, and public agencies which are found to affect the quality of the environment, shall regulate such activities so that major consideration is given to preventing environmental damage, while providing a decent home and satisfying living environment for every Californian. Page 233 Introduction 2 Initial Study The Legislature further finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to: h) Develop and maintain a high-quality environment now and in the future, and take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state. i) Take all action necessary to provide the people of this state with clean air and water, enjoyment of aesthetic, natural, scenic, and historic environmental qualities, and freedom from excessive noise. j) Prevent the elimination of fish or wildlife species due to man's activities, insure that fish and wildlife populations do not drop below self-perpetuating levels, and preserve for future generations representations of all plant and animal communities and examples of the major periods of California history. k) Ensure that the long-term protection of the environment, consistent with the provision of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian, shall be the guiding criterion in public decisions. l) Create and maintain conditions under which man and nature can exist in productive harmony to fulfill the social and economic requirements of present and future generations. m) Require governmental agencies at all levels to develop standards and procedures necessary to protect environmental quality. n) Require governmental agencies at all levels to consider qualitative factors as well as economic and technical factors and long-term benefits and costs, in addition to short-term benefits and costs and to consider alternatives to proposed actions affecting the environment. A concise statement of legislative policy, with respect to public agency consideration of Projects for some form of approval, is found in CEQA § 21002, quoted below: The Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state that public agencies should not approve Projects as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen the significant environmental effects of such Projects, and that the procedures required by this division are intended to assist public agencies in systematically identifying both the significant effects of Projects and the feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures which will avoid or substantially lessen such significant effects. The Legislature further finds and declares that in the event specific economic, social, or other conditions make infeasible such Project alternatives or such mitigation measures, individual Projects may be approved in spite of one or more significant effects thereof. 1.2 – Project Background and Purpose of the Final IS/MND The Public Review Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (Draft IS/MND) for the proposed Project was circulated for public review and comment starting June 25, 2020 and ending August 12, 2020. No public comments were received during this period on the Draft IS/MND. After the close of the public review period for the Draft IS/MND, the City asked that the Project Application include an additional General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) and 9872 Arrow Route (Parcel 4) from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The expressed purpose of this additional change is to offset the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units of that would result from the redesignation of Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Draft IS/MND included a Variance requesting a reduction in the required 20-foot setback from the adjacent residential land use and from the required 45-foot average landscape setback. The City has also requested the Project applicant remove the Variance from the Project and redesign the Site Plan so the setback from the proposed car wash building complies with the City’s Municipal Code standard of a minimum of 20 feet when adjacent to a residential use and so the Project includes the required 45-foot average landscape setback from Arrow Route. As such, the Project Site Plan was updated to shift the proposed car wash building further to the west to accommodate for a 20-foot setback with the residential use to the east. The Site Plan was also updated to include a 45-foot landscape setback. Finally, the proposed concrete block wall around the Project was changed from 8-feet to 6-feet tall. These changes are reflected in Exhibits 3 through 5 below and resulted in a reduction in the size of the proposed car wash building and detail center building, an increase in the amount of proposed Page 234 Introduction Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 3 landscaping, and a reduction in the proposed number of employee-customer parking stalls. These minor design changes will not result in any new or more severe environmental impacts than were previously analyzed in the Draft IS/MND that was circulated for public review and comment. Page 235 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 4 2 Project Description 2.1 – Project Title Arbor Express Car Wash 2.2 – Lead Agency Name and Address City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730 909-477-2750 2.3 – Contact Person and Phone Number Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner 909-477-4316 2.4 – Project Location The Project site is located approximately 2.45 miles to the south of Interstate 210 (I-210), approximately 3.02 miles to the west of Interstate 15 (I-15), and approximately 2.18 miles to the north of Interstate 10 (I-10) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California (See Exhibit 1, Regional Context Map). The Project site is comprised of two parcels totaling 1.36 acres located on the north side of Arrow Route, just east of Archibald Avenue (See Exhibit 2, Project Vicinity Map). Parcel 1 is located at 9744 Arrow Route (APN# 208-291-06 and Parcel 2 is located at 9760 Arrow Route (APN# 208-291-03). The Project Site will be developed with the proposed car wash development (See Section 2.8, below, for detailed Project description). As part of a gas station project that was recently approved by the City at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue (8477 Archibald Avenue), Parcel 1 has previously undergone a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. Parcel 2 will undergo an identical change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial as part of the Project. Two additional parcels (Parcel 3 and Parcel 4), located immediately east of the Project site at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route (APN# 0208-291-02 & 0208-291-01) will undergo a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. However, no physical changes to Parcel 3 or Parcel 4 are proposed.  Latitude 34° 5’ 58.85” North, Longitude 117° 35’ 32.14” West 2.5 – Project Sponsor’s Name and Address Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite #106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 2.6 – General Plan Land Use Designation Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential Page 236 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 5 2.7 – Zoning District Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 3: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 4: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) 2.8 – Project Description As previously described, the Project is comprised of two adjacent parcels along Arrow Route east of Archibald Avenue. Parcels 1 and 2 encompass approximately 1.36 acres, or 59,297 square feet. Parcel 1 is undeveloped while Parcel 2 contains an occupied single-family home. The single-family residence on Parcel 2 is currently used as a rental unit and will be demolished as part of the Project. As previously mentioned, Parcel 1 is currently zoned for General Commercial use as a result of a previously approved gas station Project. Parcel 2 is currently zoned for Low Medium Density Residential. As such, the Project includes a similar General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial. This would bring the entire Project site into conformance for commercial uses in order to allow for the car wash use. The car wash development includes the construction of an automated express car wash building, a detail center building, shaded vacuum canopies/stalls, and associated parking and landscaping on Parcels 1 and 2 (See Exhibit 3, Site Plan). The 5,078-square foot car wash structure will have two floors (See Exhibit 4, Floor Plan). The first floor will include an enclosed 140-foot long car wash tunnel, enclosed area for mechanical equipment, restrooms, office space, cashier space, and storage space. The second floor will include an equipment room, an office and restrooms. The detail center building will be 1,296 square feet and consist of a single floor. The detail center will be used for auto detailing, which will be a separate service from the automated car wash and will contain restrooms and an office. Three separate shaded vacuum canopy areas will be included in the parking lot area, totaling 32 stalls. An additional 8 customer-employee parking stalls will also be provided, including one clean air vehicle stall and one Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible parking stall. The proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) to General Commercial would result in the redesignation of land for residential uses to commercial uses. The redesignation of Parcel 2, which is 0.85 acres in area, would subsequently result in the loss of residential development capacity of between 3 and 6 dwelling units. As previously mentioned, the Project application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to Parcels 3 and 4, which are 0.43 and 0.79 acres in area, respectively. As shown in Table 1, Residential Density Capacity, with a maximum density of 4-8 dwelling units per acre (du/ac), Parcel 2 (0.85 acres), Parcel 3 (0.43 acres), and Parcel 4 (0.79 acres) currently have a combined residential development capacity of between 8 and 16 dwelling units. With the loss of residential development capacity from the conversion of Parcel 2 from residential to commercial, and the additional subsequent increase of the maximum density on Parcels 3 and 4 from 4-8 du/ac to 8-14 du/ac, Parcels 3 and 4 would have a maximum residential development capacity of between 9 and 17 dwelling units. Therefore, this would be enough to offset the loss of residential development capacity on Parcel 2. Table 1 Residential Density Capacity Parcel # 2 3 4 Existing Zoning (Low Medium) Existing DU/AC 4-8 4-8 4-8 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Existing Capacity 3-6 units 2-4 units 3-6 units Combined Existing Capacity 8-16 units Proposed Zoning (Medium) Proposed DU/AC 0 8-14 8-14 Acres 0.85 0.43 0.79 Proposed Capacity 0 units 3-6 units 6-11 Combined Proposed Capacity 9-17 units Page 237 Project Description 6 Initial Study Access to the site will be provided via a 50-foot wide common-approach driveway on Arrow Route with one inbound lane and one outbound lane. This will be a shared driveway with the parcel to the west of the Project site on the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, which is currently being developed with a gas station. Upon entering the site, three lanes are provided for cars to line up at three automated cashier pay stations with barrier gate arms to pay for their wash and wait their turn. The automated barrier gate arms would allow one vehicle through the car wash tunnel at a time. Upon exiting the car wash tunnel, cars will be directed to the covered vacuum stations via a one-way interior lane. To exit the site, cars would continue on the one-way lane and loop back out to the driveway onto Arrow Route. Three ADA accessible pedestrian walkways will be provided on the site: one between the car wash building and the detail center, one between the car wash building and the vacuum canopy areas and trash enclosure on the western side of the site, and one from the car wash building to the sidewalk on Arrow Route. The Project will also include LED site and building lighting as well as solar roof panels. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area (see Exhibit 5, Elevations). The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building. Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “Alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Express Car Wash System The express car wash will include a New Wave Industries, Inc. PurClean Spot Free Rinse System and PurWater Water Recovery System. The PurWater Reclaim System consists of two primary components: the underground reclaim tank(s) and the above ground PurWater unit. The below ground tanks are normally supplied by a local concrete vault vendor, with their capacity and lay-out per PurWater specifications. The primary purpose of the reclaim system is to provide quality water to the wash so that the water can be re-used within the wash and still provide a clean car. The re-use of the water allows the operator to minimize the amount of incoming fresh water to the wash and the amount that is discharged from the wash to the municipal sewer system. The reclaim system is not designed to meet a specific effluent quality of the discharge, although in many cases the water discharged from the system goes directly to sewer or a leach field. However, the system will allow for up to 86% water recycling, which will limit the amount of discharge into the municipal system at any given time. In addition, all cleaning products proposed to be used during operation of the Project would be biodegradable and environmentally friendly.   As the primary purpose of the PurWater Reclaim System is to provide quality water for re-use within the wash, the system is designed to separate settleable solids (typically sand, grit) and free hydrocarbons, from fat oil and greases, from the water going to the wash. These solids and oils can affect the wash quality, and increase the maintenance on wash pumps, piping, and nozzles. The large settleable solids (60-70 micron and larger) are settled within the underground tanks prior to entering the above ground PurWater unit. The PurWater unit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be retreated or go out with the effluent. The free oils (60-70 micron and larger) float to the surface within the underground tanks and are trapped within the tanks. Accumulated settleable solids and free oils are periodically (normally every 3- 6 months) removed from the reclaim system by pumping out the underground tanks and replacing with fresh water. Some amount of water is continuously discharged from the reclaim system in order to satisfy the water balance for the wash. The volume of discharge is dependent on the amount of fresh water used by the wash, less any water that is lost to evaporation and carry-out. Depending upon local municipal requirements, the discharge can be sent directly to sewer or to a leach field or may require additional treatment before final discharge. As each municipality will have its own discharge requirements, it is important to understand what contaminants the PurWater Reclaim System can and cannot affect. The PurWater Reclaim system uses two processes to reduce contaminant loading. The first is physical separation using centrifugal force (the cyclones) and gravity settling (the reclaim tanks). Physical separation will directly affect the amount of Page 238 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 7 free oil & grease (FOG) and total suspended solids (TSS) left in the discharge water, and indirectly affect the BOD / COD level as it removes oil & grease. The second process is chemical, oxidation using ozone. Ozone will affect the bacterial count, BOD/ COD, total suspended solids (primarily bacterial), and some dissolved oils and chemicals. From field testing and experience, the PurWater Reclaim system has been shown to produce effluent qualities as follows: TSS, FOG, and BOD are typically the main concerns by municipalities receiving an effluent from a car wash. Given the type of processes used by the PurWater Reclaim system, there is no effect on total dissolved solids (TDS), pH, or temperature. There may also be little to no effect on certain chemicals dissolved in the water, emulsified or dissolved oils, and non-settleable solids. No heavy metals are used in the process so the PurWater system will not add or impact existing heavy metals. The above effluent qualities are going to be similar for other types of systems that incorporate physical separation (plate separators, screen / bag filters, media filters, etc.) and chemical oxidation. Biological processes, when operating properly, may produce lower TSS, FOG, and BOD levels than the above, but still will not affect dissolved minerals and some dissolved chemicals in the water. The above effluent quality estimates are based on normal contaminant loadings seen by car washes. The estimates are not a guarantee of performance. The estimated discharge quality from the PurWater Reclaim System may or may not be acceptable for direct discharge to sewer or a leach field. Local authorities and municipalities should be consulted to determine whether additional treatment is required to meet discharge permits. The second component of the reclaim system is the above ground treatment system, which further removes solids from the reclaim water so that it is acceptable for the high- pressure pumps and nozzles within the wash. The PurWater reclaim unit has a suction pump that brings water up from the reclaim tank to be treated. The pump speed is controlled by a Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) to either continuously recirculate water (low speed) or to provide water to the wash (high speed). Several pump speeds can be programmed into the VFD to meet various or multiple demands. The PurWater unit uses high efficiency cyclones to remove down to 5 micron settleable solids prior to the wash. The cyclones create nearly 1000 G’s of centrifugal force to obtain this fine particle separation. The treated (cleaned) water is sent to the wash and / or back to the reclaim tank as part of its continual recirculation mode. The solids-laden water from the PurWater unit is re-introduced into the reclaim water at the front end of the underground tanks, where some solids settle, and some continue with the water phase to be re-treated or go out with the effluent. The above ground reclaim system also has the function of providing odor control for the reclaim water. Reclaim water is a great environment for growing bacteria which can create plugging and odor problems. Typically, anaerobic bacteria (bacteria that grow in the absence of oxygen) will grow beneath the settled solids in the reclaim water tank. This type of bacteria produces hydrogen sulfide which produces an odor similar to rotten eggs. To control this bacterial growth, the PurWater reclaim system continuously recirculates water through the tanks to keep the water moving so that it does not go septic. The PurWater system also incorporates one of three odor control devices to further keep the bacterial growth in check. The first method uses an Air Sparger, which brings in air as the recirculation water passes through it. This puts oxygen in the water stream and helps control the anaerobic bacteria. The second method adds an enzyme into the recirculation water, plus uses the Air Sparger. The enzyme breaks down the dissolved organic material in the water, which takes away the bacteria’s food source to keep their population controlled. The third method used is the addition of ozone, which is a powerful disinfectant similar to chlorine. The ozone kills the bacteria to provide a nearly-bacteria free water. Also, ozone oxidizes dyes in the water, so it will remove the color created by wash chemicals (i.e., triple foams). Stormwater Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route. The car wash development would consist of approximately 22,343 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 38% of the overall site total. A 20-foot landscaping setback will be included along the Project’s eastern boundary (between Parcel 2 and 3) and a 45-foot landscaping setback will be provided along the Project’s southern boundary. An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the Project’s southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping. These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment. In addition, the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. Page 239 Project Description 8 Initial Study Project Construction Details Default assumptions for construction phases were used, and construction of the proposed car wash is anticipated to take approximately four to six months to complete. Soil cut and fill will be balanced on site. Details about construction (e.g. start date, schedule, number of workers, number and type of equipment) are not available at this time; therefore, default construction details were used where necessary throughout the analysis. The proposed development will connect to existing water, sanitary sewer, electricity, and gas facilities. Water and sewer service are provided by the Cucamonga valley Water District. Electricity would be provided by Southern California Edison and natural gas will be provided by the Southern California Gas Company. Utility undergrounding would be required. The start date for construction is not currently known as of the circulation of this document. As such, CalEEMod default settings for construction were utilized to provide an estimate of construction phasing, scheduling, equipment, etc. (See Appendix A). As shown in the CalEEMod output file in Appendix A of this document, construction was estimated to begin on January 1, 2020 and conclude June 10, 2020 for an approximately 6-month construction length. As shown in Table 2, Construction Schedule, construction will include a demolition phase, site preparation phase, grading phase, building construction phase, paving phase, and architectural coating phase. Demolition activities will include use of concrete saws, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Site Preparation activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Grading activities will include use of graders, rubber-tired dozers, and tractor/loaders. Building Construction activities will include use of a crane, forklifts, generator sets, tractor/loaders, and welders. Paving activities will include use of cement and mortar mixers, pavers, rollers, and tractor/loaders. Architectural Coating activities will include use of air compressors. Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. The number of construction workers is not known at this time. Table 2 Construction Schedule Construction Phase Start Date End Date No. Days Construction Equipment Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 1 Concrete Saw, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader, Water Truck Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 3 Grader, Rubber-Tired Dozer, Tractor/Loader, Water Truck Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 100 Crane, Forklift, Generator Set, Tractor/Loader, Welder Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 Cement Mixer, Paver, Roller, Tractor/Loader Architectural Coatings 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 Air Compressor 2.9 – Surrounding Land Uses The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. A gas station project is currently under construction immediately to the west of the Project site at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. To the west of the gas station, on the northwest corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue is vacant land designated for office professional uses. Immediately to the east of the Project site are single-family homes. To the south of the Project site, on the south side of Arrow Route, is a strip-mall retail center with various businesses. Surrounding uses are summarized in Table 3, Surrounding Land Uses. Page 240 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 9 Table 3 Surrounding Land Uses Direction General Plan Designation Zoning District Existing Land Use Project Site Parcel 1: General Commercial Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential Parcel 1: General Commercial (GC) Parcel 2: Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Parcel 1: Vacant Land Parcel 2: Single Family Home North Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Mulberry Early Education Center South General Commercial/ Low Medium Residential General Commercial (GC)/ Low Density Residential (2-4 du/ac) Strip Mall/ Single Family Homes East Low Medium Residential Low Medium Residential (4-8 du/ac) Single Family Home West General Commercial/ Office General Commercial (GC)/ Office Professional (OP) Gas Station Under Construction/ Vacant Land 2.10 – Environmental Setting The Project is located on two parcels (one vacant) in a developed area in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California. The Project site is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and the area is built-out and urbanized. Disturbed non-native vegetation and limited pavement is located on the site. The Project site is bounded by commercial uses to the west and south, vacant land and residential uses to the east, and an early education center to the north. The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level (AMSL).  The site contains a local landmark known as the Beverly Hills House. The Beverly Hills House includes limited historic landscaping in the immediate vicinity of the structure.  The site does not contain scenic resources.  The site is not currently being used for agricultural purposes.  On-site vegetation consists of disturbed non-native vegetation and pavement and does not provide suitable habitat for any sensitive, or special status species.  There are no on-site water features indicative of potential riparian habitat or wetlands. 2.11 – Required Approvals The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the only land use authority for this Project requiring the following approvals:  Conditional Use Permit  Design Review  General Plan Amendment  Zone Change 2.12 – Other Public Agency Whose Approval is Required None Page 241 Project Description 10 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 242 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 11 Exhibit 1 Regional Context Map Page 243 Project Description 12 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 244 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 13 Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map Page 245 Project Description 14 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 246 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 15 Exhibit 3 Site Plan Page 247 Project Description 16 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 248 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 17 Exhibit 4 Floor Plans Page 249 Project Description 18 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 250 Project Description Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 19 Exhibit 5 Elevations Page 251 Project Description 20 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 252 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 21 3 Determination 3.1 – Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this Project, involving at least one impact that is a ‘Potentially Significant Impact’ as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. □ Aesthetics □ Agriculture Resources □ Air Quality □ Biological Resources □ Cultural Resources □ Geology /Soils □ Greenhouse Gas Emissions □ Hazards & Hazardous Materials □ Hydrology / Water Quality □ Land Use / Planning □ Mineral Resources □ Noise □ Population / Housing □ Public Services □ Recreation □ Transportation/Traffic □ Tribal Cultural Resources □ Utilities / Service Systems □ Mandatory Findings of Significance 3.2 – Determination □ I find that the Project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the Project have been made by or agreed to by the Project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. □ I find that the Project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. □ I find that the Project MAY have a ‘potentially significant impact’ or ‘potentially significant unless mitigated’ impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. □ I find that although the Project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the Project, nothing further is required. Name: Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Date Page 253 Determination 22 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 254 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 23 4 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4.1 – Aesthetics Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? □ □ □ b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within view from a state scenic highway? □ □ □ c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? □ □ □ d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? □ □ □ A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020. The report is attached as Appendix B. a) No Impact. Scenic vistas can be impacted by development in two ways. First, a structure may be constructed that blocks the view of a vista. Second, the vista itself may be altered (i.e., development on a scenic hillside). According to the City of Rancho Cucamonga 2010 General Plan Update Managing Land Use, Community Design and Historic Resources chapter, the primary scenic resources within the City include the San Gabriel Mountains and the foothills.1 The Project site is relatively flat with an elevation ranging between approximately 1,153 to 1,162 feet above mean sea level. The Project is located on two adjacent parcels (one undeveloped parcel and one parcel with an occupied single-family home), within a fully urbanized area, visually dominated by commercial uses, residential uses, and surface streets. This site is not considered to be within or to comprise a portion of a scenic vista.2 Compliance with Municipal Code guidelines and regulations restricting height would ensure that views of scenic resources, including views of the San Bernardino Mountains to the north, would be preserved through standard height restrictions. Views of the surrounding hillsides from the Project site are obstructed by existing development and landscaping and are limited. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point, which complies with the City’s Zoning Code (Section 17.36.030) restrictions for building height. The Project will include a 6-foot concrete wall between the car wash and the Beverly Hills House; however, this wall will not block existing views of scenic vistas to the north. Because the proposed development would not result in structures greater in height than currently exists in the vicinity, development of the Project and accessory landscaping elements would have no effect on a scenic vista. The Project Application also includes a Zone Change and General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately east of the Project site located at 9786 and 9872 Arrow Route. While the change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential would lead to a higher residential density capacity on the parcel, any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to scenic vistas at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City’s Municipal Code height restrictions for residential uses. As such, the Project would result in no direct or indirect impact with respect to view of a scenic vista. Page 255 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 24 Initial Study b) No Impact. The Project is located in an urbanized area and not adjacent to a designated state scenic highway or eligible state scenic highway as identified on the California Scenic Highway Mapping System.3 Additionally, as discussed in Section 4.1.c. below, the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, as construction and operation of the proposed Project would not result in any changes or damage to the Beverly House (Please also see discussion of vibration-related impacts in Section 4.1.2 (Noise) of this document). Because the Project is not located adjacent to a designated or eligible state scenic highway, and the Beverly Hills House would not be directly or indirectly impacted by the proposed Project, no impact to scenic resources visible from a state scenic highway or local scenic road would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Development of the Project could result in a significant impact if it resulted in substantial degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Degradation of visual character or quality is defined by substantial changes to the existing site appearance through construction of structures such that they are poorly designed or conflict with the site’s existing surroundings. Construction of the proposed Project would result in short-term impacts to the existing visual character and quality of the area. Construction activities would require the use of equipment and storage of materials within the Project site. However, construction activities are temporary and would not result in any permanent visual impact. Upon Project completion, the Project would consist of one car wash facility that includes a car wash tunnel, office, restrooms, vacuum area, and parking. Access to the site will be provided via a shared 50-foot driveway on Arrow Route. The building heights will not exceed 24 feet at its highest point. The proposed car wash building would be developed at a maximum height of 24 feet at its highest point, which complies with the City’s Zoning Code (Section 17.36.030) restrictions for building height. Architecturally, the proposed car wash structure would be comprised of a terra cotta tile roof, stucco exterior walls with stone veneer accents, recessed faux window arches, decorative doors and columns, and lattice covers to replicate the design of the historic vineyards in the area. The detail center building will be of similar architectural design as the car wash building. Various shades of brown and tan as well as stone accents are utilized to provide contrast and visual interest. The covered vacuum canopies will consist of “Alumawood” arbors, with bronze framing and shade fabric with color accents. The car wash development will also include a monument sign and decorative grape arbor with columns along the southern edge of the site to provide for an aesthetic appeal along Arrow Route and replicate the grape vineyards that once occupied that area. Parcel 1 is undeveloped, while Parcel 2 contains a single-family residence. Project construction would result in demolition of the vacant single-family home. While no direct or indirect changes to the single-family residence located to the east of the site (the Beverly Hills House) would occur as a result of construction of the proposed Project, the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial could alter the visual character of the Project site and its surroundings. According to the Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report, the residence directly to the east of the Project site, dubbed the Beverly Hills House, has been designated in the City’s Historic Landmarks Points of Interest as City Landmark #32. According to the report, the Beverly Hills House was constructed between 1927 and 1932, and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location. Evaluations performed during the Cultural Resources Assessment for the proposed Project recommended the property as eligible for listing in the California Register; therefore, the Beverly Hills House is recommended a historical resource (i.e., significant) under CEQA. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property and no direct or indirect impacts from construction and operation of the car wash development would occur. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House in the future, they will take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property’s setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity, and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark. This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting. A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C). Therefore, the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact Page 256 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 25 on the building’s integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its circa 1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a substantial negative impact to the visual character of the site or its surroundings. The Project is adjacent to a gas station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue, as well as strip-mall type commercial uses on the south side of Arrow Route, across from the proposed Project. Surrounding uses are generally one to two stories in height, which is similar to the proposed car wash building. The surrounding area is not visually distinct and does not portray a particular architectural theme or aesthetic. However, there is a historical theme relating to the region’s agricultural past, that the City encourages in proposed development projects. These themes have been incorporated into the proposed Project. Therefore, the car wash development would represent a new commercial feature within a primarily commercial area. Because of the commercial uses in the immediate vicinity of the Project site, the addition of the Project would provide a new architectural aesthetic in an area that is older in character and would not conflict with the existing character. With specified design features included, the car wash development and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial would have less than significant impacts on the visual character of the site and the surroundings. Additionally, any future proposed development on the parcel would be required to analyze potential impacts to impacts to the visual character of the site and its surroundings at such time that an application is submitted to the City, pursuant to CEQA. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan Design Guidelines for residential uses. Impacts will be less than significant. d) Less than Significant Impact. Excessive or inappropriately directed lighting can adversely impact night-time views by reducing the ability to see the night sky and stars. Glare can be caused from unshielded or misdirected lighting sources. Reflective surfaces (i.e., polished metal) can also cause glare. Impacts associated with glare range from simple nuisance to potentially dangerous situations (i.e., if glare is directed into the eyes of motorists). Sources of daytime glare are typically concentrated in commercial areas and are often associated with retail uses. Glare results from development and associated parking areas that contain reflective materials such as hi-efficiency window glass, highly polished surfaces, and expanses of pavement. There are lighting sources adjacent to this site, including free-standing street lights, light fixtures on buildings, and pole- mounted lights. The car wash development includes interior lighting and outdoor security lighting. Light spillover and glare would be avoided by requiring that light be designed to Project downward and prohibiting the creation of glare on adjacent properties per the requirements of Municipal Code Section 17.58.050.A-D (General Lighting Requirements). The Project also includes solar roof panels; however, solar roof panels are designed to absorb light and would not cause glare. Compliance with the Municipal Code standards for lighting and glare during construction and operation of the proposed Project would ensure that lighting and glare impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The potential aesthetic impacts related to views and aesthetics are generally site specific. As discussed above, Project-related impacts would be less than significant. Lighting and sources of glare, while not always site-specific, would be consistent with the majority of the surrounding urban area and would be used during similar hours as surrounding uses. While the Project plus cumulative development would change the appearance of the site and surrounding area, all development Projects would be expected to be conditioned to follow applicable local planning and design guidelines as specified in Section 17.58.050 of the City’s Municipal Code. Therefore, aesthetic impacts are not expected to be cumulatively considerable and no adverse impacts would occur. Page 257 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 26 Initial Study 4.2 – Agriculture and Forest Resources In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? □ □ □ b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? □ □ □ c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104 (g))? □ □ □ d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project would be located in a fully developed, urbanized area that does not contain agriculture or forest uses. The Important Farmland in California (2014) prepared by the Department of Conservation identifies the Project site as Urban and Built-Up Land and does not identify the Project site as being Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance.4 Therefore, there would be no conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance to a non-agricultural use as a result of construction of the proposed Project. No impact would occur. b) No Impact. No Williamson Act contracts are active for the Project site.5 Therefore, there would be no conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur. Page 258 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 27 c) No Impact. Public Resources Code § 12220(g) identifies forest land as land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits. The Project site and surrounding properties are not currently being managed or used for forest land as identified in Public Resources Code § 12220(g). The Project site has already been disturbed by previous development and is surrounded by residential and commercial uses. Therefore, development of this Project would have no impact to any timberland zoning. d) No Impact. The Project site is partially developed, disturbed land with limited non-native vegetation; thus, there would be no loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non-forest use as a result of this Project. No impact would occur. e) No Impact. The Project site is a partially developed site within an urban environment. The Project is surrounded by commercial and residential uses and surface streets. None of the surrounding sites contains existing forest uses. Development of the proposed Project would not change the existing environment in a manner that would result in the conversion of forestland to a non-forest use. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact on agricultural and forestry resources. Development of the Project would not preclude or hinder existing or future agricultural operations in the surrounding area. Therefore, the Project would not contribute to a cumulatively considerable impact. Page 259 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 28 Initial Study 4.3 – Air Quality Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? □ □ □ b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or Projected air quality violation? □ □ □ c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the Project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? □ □ □ d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? □ □ □ e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact could occur if the Project conflicts with or obstructs implementation of the South Coast Air Basin 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Conflicts and obstructions that hinder implementation of the AQMP can delay efforts to meet attainment deadlines for criteria pollutants and maintaining existing compliance with applicable air quality standards. Pursuant to the methodology provided in Chapter 12 of the 1993 SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook, consistency with the South Coast Air Basin 2016 AQMP is affirmed when a project (1) does not increase the frequency or severity of an air quality standards violation or cause a new violation and (2) is consistent with the growth assumptions in the AQMP.6 Consistency review is presented below: (1) The Project would result in short-term construction and long-term pollutant emissions that are less than the CEQA significance emissions thresholds established by the SCAQMD, as demonstrated herein; therefore, the Project would not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of any air quality standards violation and would not cause a new air quality standard violation. (2) The CEQA Air Quality Handbook indicates that consistency with AQMP growth assumptions must be analyzed for new or amended General Plan elements, Specific Plans, and significant Projects. Significant Projects include airports, electrical generating facilities, petroleum and gas refineries, designation of oil drilling districts, water ports, solid waste disposal sites, and off-shore drilling facilities. This Project is considered significant because it includes a General Plan Amendment. This Consistency Criterion refers to the growth forecasts and associated assumptions included in the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP was designed to achieve attainment for all criteria air pollutants within the Basin while still accommodating growth in the region. Projects that are consistent with the AQMP growth assumptions would not interfere with attainment of air quality standards, because this growth is included in the projections used to formulate the AQMP. Therefore, if the growth under the Project is consistent with the regional population, housing, and employment forecasts identified by SCAG in the RTP/SCS, plan Page 260 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 29 implementation would be consistent with the AQMP, even if emissions could potentially exceed the SCAQMD’s recommended daily emissions thresholds. The proposed Project would result in the loss of one (1) single-family residential unit with a decrease of between two (2) and six (6) residents. The Project will also result in an increase of employees in the area by approximately three (3) to six (6) employees. The 2016 RTP/SCS population and employment projections for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as well as the decrease in population and increase in employment that would occur with the implementation of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, are shown in Table 4 (RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions). Table 4 RTP/SCS and Specific Plan Growth Assumptions Proposed Project Population Employment Arbor Car Wash and GPA/ZCA -2 to -6 3 to 6 RTC/SCS Growth 2012 - 2040 34,200 34,700 Within Growth Assumptions? Yes Yes Source: SCAG 2016.7 As shown in Table 4, the implementation of the proposed Project would not exceed the growth assumptions contained in the AQMP. Impacts will be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. A project may have a significant impact if Project-related emissions would exceed federal, state, or regional standards or thresholds, or if Project-related emissions would substantially contribute to existing or Project air quality violations. The Project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, where efforts to attain state and federal air quality standards are governed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Both the state of California (state) and the federal government have established health-based ambient air quality standards (AAQS) for seven air pollutants (known as ‘criteria pollutants’). These pollutants include ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), inhalable particulate matter with a diameter of 10 microns or less (PM10), fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). The state has also established AAQS for additional pollutants. The AAQS are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace within a reasonable margin of safety. Where the state and federal standards differ, California AAQS are more stringent than the national AAQS (except for Federal NO2 standards which are stricter). Air pollution levels are measured at monitoring stations located throughout the air basin. Areas that are in nonattainment with respect to federal or state AAQS are required to prepare plans and implement measures that will bring the region into attainment. Table 5, South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status, summarizes the attainment status in the Project area for the criteria pollutants. Discussion of potential impacts related to short-term construction impacts and long-term area source and operational impacts are presented below. Table 5 South Coast Air Basin Attainment Status Pollutant Federal State O3 (1-hr) -- Nonattainment O3 (8-hr) Nonattainment Nonattainment PM10 Attainment Nonattainment PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Attainment Attainment SO2 Attainment Attainment Pb Nonattainment Attainment Source: ARB, 2020. See Appendix A. Page 261 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 30 Initial Study Construction Emissions Short-term criteria pollutant emissions will occur during demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities related to development of the proposed car wash. Emissions will occur from use of equipment, worker, vendor, and hauling trips, and disturbance of onsite soils (fugitive dust). To determine if construction of the Project could result in a significant air quality impact, the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 has been utilized. CalEEMod defaults have generally been used as construction inputs into the model (see Appendix A), with modifications to the model described in detail below. The methodology for calculating emissions is included in the CalEEMod User Guide, freely available at http://www.caleemod.com. The “Automobile Care Center” land use category was used in the model to represent the proposed car wash and detail center, and a total of 7,292 square feet of floor area was included. A total of 39,254 square feet of the “Other Asphalt Surfaces” land use category was used in the model to account for on-site surface parking and the covered vacuum stalls. Finally, a total of 18,267 square feet of landscaping was also included in the model as “Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces”. Demolition of the single-family home on Parcel 2 would occur as a result of Project construction; therefore, a total of 1,912 square feet of demolition was included in the model. Soils imports and exports will balance on site. Construction activities are anticipated to start in January 2019 and be completed by summer 2019. As such, the first full operational year for the Project will be 2020. CalEEMod defaults for equipment needs were utilized. Based on the results of the model, maximum daily emissions from the construction of the car wash would not result in excessive emissions of criteria pollutants. As indicated in Table 6, Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs./day), emissions of criteria pollutants would not exceed SCAQMD daily construction thresholds. Impact would be less than significant. Table 6 Car Wash Maximum Daily Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Summer 2019 17.01 25.40 16.01 0.03 3.82 2.19 Winter 2019 17.01 25.44 16.00 0.03 3.82 2.19 Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Substantial? No No No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. Operational Emissions Operation of the proposed car wash facility would result in long-term criteria air pollutant emissions. Long-term emissions are categorized as area source emissions, energy demand emissions, and operational emissions. Operational emissions would result from vehicle sources associated with daily trips to and from the proposed car wash. Area source emissions are the combination of many small emission sources that include use of outdoor landscape maintenance equipment, use of consumer products, and periodic repainting of the small structure. Energy demand emissions result from use of electricity and natural gas. The proposed car wash consists of one automated tunnel designed to reclaim and recycle water. According to the International Carwash Association, “self-serve” automatic car washes use approximately 30 gallons of freshwater per vehicle.8 As such, water use for the proposed car wash was estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle – though each individual vehicle washed would require more water, the Project Proponent estimates that the car wash would recycle up to 86% of all water used. As such, 30 gallons per vehicle is likely an overestimation for total water usage. Number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day, based on the Project proponent’s estimates of similar developments. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually, total water demand is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year. Because data are not widely available on energy consumption by the type of vacuums used at these types of facilities, the default energy use amounts were. CalEEMod was utilized to estimate mobile source emissions. Project trip generation rates were taken from the Project Traffic Impact Analysis, performed by Trames Solutions, Inc. in September 2018 (See Appendix G).9 CalEEMod also includes default outdoor water demand for landscape irrigation. Default inputs for all operational sources were used for the Project. Daily operational emissions as estimated by CalEEMod are summarized in Table 7, Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions. Operational emissions generated by operation of the car wash would not exceed the thresholds established by SCAQMD. Impacts will be less than significant. Page 262 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 31 Table 7 Car Wash Operational Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Summer Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.24 5.70 14.55 0.05 3.72 1.03 Summer Total 1.43 5.76 14.61 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Area Sources 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Demand 0.01 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.00 0.00 Mobile Sources 1.20 5.81 13.91 0.05 3.72 1.03 Winter Total 1.39 5.87 13.97 0.05 3.72 1.03 SCAQMD Daily Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Potentially Significant? No No No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. c) Less than Significant Impact. Cumulative short-term, construction-related emissions from the Project will not contribute considerably to any potential cumulative air quality impact because short-term Project emissions will be less than significant and other concurrent construction Projects in the region will be required to implement standard air quality regulations and mitigation pursuant to State CEQA requirements, just as this Project has. The SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook identifies methodologies for analyzing long-term cumulative air quality impacts for criteria pollutants for which the Basin is nonattainment. These methodologies identify three performance standards that can be used to determine if long-term emissions will result in cumulative impacts. Essentially, these methodologies assess growth associated with a land use Project and are evaluated for consistency with regional Projections. These methodologies are outdated and are no longer recommended by SCAQMD. SCAQMD allows a project to be analyzed using the Projection method such that consistency with the AQMP will indicate that a project will not contribute considerably to cumulative air quality impacts. As discussed in AQMP Consistency, the Project is consistent with growth assumptions in the AQMP and would not exceed any applicable SCAQMD thresholds for short- and long-term emissions. Therefore, the Project will not contribute to any potential cumulative air quality impacts. d) Less than Significant Impact. Sensitive receptors are those segments of the population that are most susceptible to poor air quality such as children, the elderly, the sick, and athletes who perform outdoors. Land uses associated with sensitive receptors include residences, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, athletic facilities, long-term health care facilities, rehabilitation centers, convalescent centers, and retirement homes. Sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the proposed Project include residences to the east and the early childhood education center to the north of the site. Localized Significance Thresholds As part of SCAQMD’s environmental justice program, attention has recently been focusing more on the localized effects of air quality. Although the region may be in attainment for a particular criteria pollutant, localized emissions from construction activities coupled with ambient pollutant levels can cause localized increases in criteria pollutant that exceed national and/or State air quality standards. Construction LST’s Construction-related criteria pollutant emissions and potentially significant localized impacts from the proposed car wash were evaluated pursuant to the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Thresholds Methodology. This methodology provides screening tables for one through five-acre Project scenarios, depending on the amount of site disturbance during a day using the Fact Sheet for equipment usage in CalEEMod.10 Daily oxides of nitrogen (NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions will occur during site preparation and grading activities on the site. Table 8, Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day), summarizes on- and off-site emissions as compared to the local Page 263 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 32 Initial Study thresholds established for Source Receptor Area (SRA) 32 (Northwest San Bernardino Valley). The car wash site is approximately 1.36-acres in size; therefore, the 1-acre threshold was used. A 25-meter receptor distance was used to reflect the proximity of the single-family home located just to the east of the Project site. This receptor is the closest to the Project site; therefore, would have the highest noise impacts. Table 8 Car Wash Localized Significance Threshold Analysis (lbs/day) Phase CO NOX PM10 PM2.5 Demolition 14.89 22.68 2.13 1.33 Site Preparation 7.89 19.48 3.73 2.17 Grading 6.61 16.04 3.01 1.82 Building Construction 13.49 15.98 0.92 0.88 Paving 8.90 9.17 0.52 0.48 Architectural Coating 1.84 1.84 0.13 0.13 Threshold 863 118 5 4 Potentially Substantial? No No No No Source: MIG, 2018. See Appendix A. As shown in Table 7, emissions of NOX and CO will be greatest during demolition, site preparation, grading, and building construction activities associated with the proposed car wash. Emissions of particulate matter will be greatest during site preparation and grading activities. It should be noted that the CalEEMod results summarized in Table 8 include application of SCAQMD Rule 403 and require the utilization of applicable best management practices to minimize fugitive dust emissions. A 50 percent reduction in fugitive dust emissions is assumed based on rule requirements (while the Project Construction Noise Analysis states that water trucks would not be used during construction, such trucks will in fact be used to control fugitive dust during Project construction- See Section 4.12 for Noise Analysis). Based on CalEEMod calculations, and assuming that exposed areas will be watered two times daily during construction activities, localized emissions of criteria pollutants will not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds during construction of the proposed car wash. Impacts will be less than significant. Operation LST’s Operation-related LSTs become of concern when there are substantial on-site stationary sources such as smoke stacks or furnaces that could impact surrounding receptors. The Project does not include such on-site operations, and the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not permit such operations; therefore, impacts related to operational LSTs will not occur. Carbon Monoxide Hot Spots A carbon monoxide (CO) hotspot is an area of localized CO pollution that is caused by severe vehicle congestion on major roadways, typically near intersections. CO hotspots have the potential to violate State and Federal CO standards at intersections, even if the broader Basin is in attainment for Federal and State levels. The California Department of Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol (Protocol) screening procedures have been utilized to determine if the Project could potentially result in a CO hotspot. Based on the recommendations of the Protocol, a screening analysis should be performed for the Project to determine if a detailed analysis will be required. The California Department of Transportation notes that because of the age of the assumptions used in the screening procedures and the obsolete nature of the modeling tools utilized to develop the screening procedures in the Protocol, they are no longer accepted. More recent screening procedures based on more current methodologies have been developed. The SCAQMD has not developed a screening threshold. The Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) developed a screening threshold in 2011, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 31,600 vehicles per hour or more will require detailed analysis. In addition, the Bay Area Air Quality Management District developed a screening threshold in 2010, which states that any project involving an intersection experiencing 44,000 vehicles per hour would require detailed analysis. Additionally, a CMP Intersection refers to the intersection of two CMP roadways, of which both Arrow Highway and Archibald are considered CMP roadways.11 However, the Project’s operations would not generate 31,600 or 44,000 vehicle trips per hour. The Project would also not increase traffic volumes at affected intersections to more than 24,000 vehicles per hour where Page 264 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 33 vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited (e.g., tunnel, parking garage, bridge underpass, natural or urban street canyon, below-grade roadway). Finally, the Project is consistent with the applicable congestion management program established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, regional transportation plan, and local congestion management agency plans. Therefore, the Project passes the screening analysis and impacts are deemed less than significant. Based on the local analysis procedures, the Project would not result in a CO hotspot, and would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. e) Less than Significant Impact. According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints include agricultural operations, wastewater treatment plants, landfills, and certain industrial operations (such as manufacturing uses that produce chemicals, paper, etc.). Odors are typically associated with industrial projects involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes, as well as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. The proposed Project does not include any of the above noted uses or processes. While short- term odors could be generated during construction as a result of activities like asphalt laying and application of architectural coatings, these impacts will be temporary and will cease upon Project completion. Less than significant impacts would occur. Cumulative Impacts No single project is sufficient in size to, by itself, result in nonattainment of ambient air quality standards. Instead, a project’s individual emissions contribute to existing cumulatively significant adverse air quality impacts. The SCAQMD developed the operational thresholds of significance based on the level above which a project’s individual emissions would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to the Basin’s existing air quality conditions. Therefore, a project that exceeds the SCAQMD construction and/or operational thresholds would also be a cumulatively considerable contribution to a significant cumulative impact. As described in this section, the proposed car wash operational emissions would not exceed thresholds. Therefore, the Project would not result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant cumulative air quality impacts. Page 265 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 34 Initial Study 4.4 – Biological Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? □ □ □ c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? □ □ □ d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? □ □ □ e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? □ □ □ f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? □ □ □ Page 266 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 35 a) Less than Significant Impact. According to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife BIOS viewer, a total of six sensitive wildlife species and no sensitive plant species were identified as occurring within the Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, within which the Project site is located.12 However, given the previously disturbed nature of the site and surrounding area, it is highly unlikely that any plant or wildlife species listed by the State and/or Federal government as endangered or threatened occur at the Project site. Based on site visits there is limited ornamental landscaping and trees on site; however, there is no identifiable natural habitat on site. Construction of the car wash will include replacement of existing ornamental landscaping with similar landscaping upon Project completion. Therefore, less than significant impacts would occur with construction of the Project. b-c) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. According to the federal National Wetlands Inventory, the Project site does not contain any riparian habitat or wetlands and the Project would not disturb any offsite wetlands.13 There is no vegetation or on-site water features indicative of potential wetlands. No impact would occur. d) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The site is bounded by roadways to the west and south, a school to the north, and residential uses to the east, preventing the use of the Project site and surrounding area as a wildlife corridor. There are no substantial vegetated areas or waterbodies located onsite that could serve as habitat. However, there are a number of trees on the Project site that have the potential to provide habitat for nesting birds. Vegetation communities on the Project Site have the potential to provide nesting habitat for bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code (CFGC) Sections 3503 and 3513. There is potential for ground- and tree-nesting birds to establish nests on the Project Site prior to project construction. Destruction of, or disturbance to, an active nest is prohibited. Construction activities including site mobilization, tree removal other vegetation clearing activities, grubbing, grading, and noise/vibration from the operation of heavy equipment also has the potential to result in significant direct (i.e., death or physical harm) and/or indirect (i.e., nest abandonment) impacts to nesting birds. Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would be required to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). Page 267 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 36 Initial Study e) No Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The Project includes the removal of five trees. The proposed Project will comply with the provisions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.80, Tree Preservation), which prohibits the removal of a City tree by any person or entity other than the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are no City trees on the Project site. Therefore, development of the proposed express car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change will not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. No impact will occur. f) No Impact. The Project site is not within any Habitat Conservation Plan area and no impacts would occur.14 Cumulative Impacts As discussed above, impacts related to Biological Resources are anticipated to be less than significant. Similar to the proposed car wash development, all cumulative Projects would be subject to individual project review and conformance with conservation plans and standard provisions for compliance with state and federal protection laws. Since Project- related impacts would be less than significant and because cumulative Project-related impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation, the cumulative impact from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable projects, would be expected to be less than significant. Therefore, cumulative impacts would be less than significant. Page 268 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 37 4.5 – Cultural Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in '15064.5? □ □ □ b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to '15064.5? □ □ □ c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? □ □ □ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries? □ □ □ A Cultural Resources Assessment and Historical Resources Evaluation report was prepared by BCR Consulting and dated April 6, 2020 and provides the basis for the analysis in this Section. a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site encompasses approximately 1.36 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and a privately-owned residential property to the east. To the west of the site is a parcel currently being developed with a gas station. As discussed in the Historical Resources Evaluation, a cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project. The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the Project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the Project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the Project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). As such, it is not a recommended “historical resource” under CEQA and does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route (Parcel 3) is known as the Beverly Hills House. The Beverly Hills House was designated as City Landmark #32 in 1989. The listing criteria was requested and not available to the applicant. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore, the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e., significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” The Project includes demolition of the existing single-family home on Parcel 2, construction of an express car wash and detail center, and associated parking and landscaping improvements and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial on Parcel 2. The Project has been designed to include a 6-foot concrete-block wall and 20-foot setback to provide a buffer along the eastern and northern edges of the development. Construction of the car wash development will involve Page 269 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 38 Initial Study minimal ground disturbing activities. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. This change would not authorize any development on this parcel and, pursuant to CEQA, any future proposed development would be required to analyze potential impacts to historical resources at such time that an application is submitted to the City. Further, any future development on the parcel would be subject to review and approval by the City’s Historic Preservation Commission. No physical changes to the Beverly Hills House would occur with development of the car wash and there are no direct impacts to the Beverly Hills House from the car wash development. The Project will not result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of the resource would be impaired. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Preservation is anticipated at 9786 Arrow Route (the Beverly Hills House), since Project-related impacts are not proposed within the boundaries of this property. Should any alterations be proposed to the Beverly Hills House, they would take place pursuant to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation, under the supervision of a professional that meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Professional Qualification Standards for Historic Architecture. The Project proposes to construct an express carwash adjacent to the house at 9786 Arrow Route, “The Beverly Hills House.” The Project will take place on parcels adjacent to the Beverly Hills House property, and the house will be preserved in place. Although the house itself will not be moved or altered, the Project will substantially alter the historic property’s setting. Setting is one of the seven aspects of integrity, and while it is particularly important to integrity of historic districts, it is less important for an individual landmark. This house was moved in the 1950s and lost its original integrity of location and setting. A building that has been moved, however, may retain sufficient integrity to qualify for historic listing after it has been moved if, like this house, its primary significance is architecture or design (Criterion C). Therefore, the proposed alteration to the current setting will not have a substantial impact on the building’s integrity, since it is able to convey its important architectural features even though its c1928 setting and location are no longer present. The proposed Project will therefore not result in a significant adverse to a historical resource. The proposed Project does not include any direct or indirect changes to the Beverly Hills House and is therefore preserving the house and property as they currently exist. According to the Historical Resources Evaluation, construction and operation of the express car wash development would not cause a substantial adverse change in the Beverly Hills House. There would be no direct impact on the resource; therefore, there would be no adverse impact. In the future should any physical changes be proposed for the Beverly Hills House, the City would require completion of an evaluation to determine eligibility for listing in the California Register. Any applicant(s) for future development at 9786 Arrow Route would be required to conduct a full historic resource impact analysis on the Beverly Hills House prior to receipt of demolition permits. The analysis would include the following: 1) a full California Register eligibility evaluation of the Beverly Hills House, 2) an analysis of direct and indirect construction and operation impacts of the proposed development on the Beverly Hills House, and 3) recommendations for mitigation measures, if necessary. If it is determined that the development would result in demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the Beverly Hills House, such that the significance of the resource would be impaired, the applicant would be required to implement the recommended mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the City’s Community Development Director and/or Historic Preservation Commission. Mitigation measures shall include, but not be limited to, data collection, preservation of the resource in place, or resource relocation. Should the property be determined to be eligible, a report would be prepared indicating options for mitigation in priority preference order of Preservation, Data Collection, and Resource Relocation. As such, the Project will have a less than significant impact. b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the cultural resources records search and field survey, findings for archaeological resources were negative. Given the urbanized nature of the Project vicinity, previously recorded archaeological resources are not anticipated to be uncovered during Project construction activities. However, formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. In addition, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources. With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 and SMBMI-2 and GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3, impacts to archaeological resources will be less than significant. Page 270 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 39 Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Page 271 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 40 Initial Study c) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project site consists of two previously disturbed parcels. One of the parcels is currently undeveloped (Parcel 1) and one contains a single-family residence (parcels 2). The Project will include demolition of the existing single-family home on parcel 2 and construction of an express car wash and associated parking and landscaping improvements. The Project also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from residential to commercial on Parcel 2. Any buried paleontological resources would have already been uncovered or destroyed at the time of initial grading of the Project site. However, in the event that paleontological materials are uncovered, Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4 are required to reduce potentially significant impacts to previously undiscovered paleontological resources and/or unique geological features that may be accidentally encountered during Project implementation to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure CUL-1 requires that a paleontological sensitivity training for construction personnel be conducted before commencement of excavation activities. Mitigation Measure CUL-2 requires that a qualified paleontologist conduct periodic paleontological spot checks to determine if excavations have extended into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits as well as the presence of a paleontological monitor during all excavations into the local geologic formation or into older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Mitigation Measure CUL-3 requires that ground-disturbing activities be halted or diverted away from the vicinity and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established if paleontological materials are encountered until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure CUL-4 requires that a professional paleontologist prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring efforts, methodology used, and the description of fossils collected and their significance. With implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-4, impacts to paleontological resources will be less than significant as a result of construction of the proposed car wash. Mitigation Measures CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity Page 272 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 41 of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. No known human remains are anticipated to be located on or beneath the Project site. However, formal mitigation was requested during consultation with local Native American Tribes. Specifically, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 to reduce impacts to previously undiscovered buried human remains. In addition, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (GBMIKN) requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains. In the unlikely event that human remains are uncovered the contractor is required to halt work in the immediate area of the find and to notify the County Coroner, in accordance with Health and Safety Code § 7050.5, who must then determine whether the remains are of forensic interest. If the Coroner, with the aid of a supervising archaeologist, determines that the remains are or appear to be of a Native American, he/she must contact the Native American Heritage Commission for further investigations and proper recovery of such remains, if necessary. Therefore, with implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-3 and GBMIKN-4 through GBMIKN-8, impacts to buried human remains will be less than significant. Mitigation Measure SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). Page 273 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 42 Initial Study GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation, the Project would result in no impacts to historical resources and less than significant impacts to known archaeological or paleontological resources and known human remains. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other Projects in the region is not likely since Projects would be subject to individual Project-level environmental review. Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect cultural resources and prevent significant impact to paleontological resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. Page 274 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 43 4.6 – Geology and Soils Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. □ □ □ ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? □ □ □ iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? □ □ □ iv) Landslides? □ □ □ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? □ □ □ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? □ □ □ d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? □ □ □ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? □ □ □ a.i) Less than Significant Impact. Although the Project site is located in seismically active Southern California, the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone.15 No active faults have been identified at the ground surface on the Project site. Impacts would be less than significant. Page 275 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 44 Initial Study a.ii) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site is located in an area of high regional seismicity. The Red Hill fault is approximately 3 miles northwest of the Project site and the Cucamonga fault is approximately 5.75 miles north of the Project site. Ground shaking originating from earthquakes along other active faults in the region is expected to induce lower horizontal accelerations due to smaller anticipated earthquakes and/or greater distances to other faults. The Project is subject to the seismic design criteria of the California Building Code (CBC). The 2016 California Building Code (California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Volume 2) contains seismic safety provisions with the aim of preventing building collapse during a design earthquake, so that occupants would be able to evacuate after the earthquake. A design earthquake is one with a two percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, or an average return period of 2,475 years. Adherence to these requirements will reduce the potential of the building from collapsing during an earthquake, thereby minimizing injury and loss of life. Although structures may be damaged during earthquakes, adherence to seismic design requirements will minimize damage to property within the structure because the structure is designed not to collapse. The CBC is intended to provide minimum requirements to prevent major structural failure and loss of life. Adherence to existing regulations will reduce the risk of loss, injury, and death; impacts due to strong ground shaking would be less than significant with construction of the proposed car wash. a.iii) Less than Significant Impact. Liquefaction generally occurs as a “quicksand” type of ground failure caused by strong ground shaking. The primary factors influencing liquefaction potential include groundwater, soil type, relative density of the sandy soils, confining pressure, and the intensity and duration of ground shaking. The California Geological Survey (CGS) has not yet conducted seismic hazard mapping in the area of the Project site. The San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map does not include the Project site within a liquefaction susceptibility area; therefore, the subsurface conditions at the site are not considered to be conducive to liquefaction.16 Based on the mapping performed by San Bernardino County and the conditions encountered at the site, which have been discussed in detail in previous sections, adverse impacts due to the risk of liquefaction are less than significant. a.iv) No Impact. Landslides are mass movements of the ground that include rock falls, relatively shallow slumping and sliding of soil, and deeper rotational or transitional movement of soil or rock. The Project site is relatively flat and, according to the San Bernardino County Geologic Hazard Overlay Map, is not located within an area susceptible to landslides. Therefore, there would be no impact from landslides on the Project and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Topsoil is used to cover surface areas for the establishment and maintenance of vegetation due to its high concentrations of organic matter and microorganisms. Little native topsoil is likely to occur on the site because of previous development activities. Construction of the proposed Project would have the potential to expose surficial soils to wind and water erosion during construction activities. Wind erosion would be minimized through soil stabilization measures required by South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), such as daily watering. Water erosion would also be prevented through the City’s standard erosion control practices (Municipal Code Section 8.21.160) required pursuant to the California Building Code and the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), such as silt fencing or berms. Following Project construction, the site would be covered completely by paving, the car wash structure, and landscaping. Impacts related to soil erosion would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. c) Less than Significant Impact. Impacts related to liquefaction and landslides are discussed above in Sections 4.6.a and 4.6.b. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The downslope movement is due to gravity and earthquake shaking combined. Such movement can occur on slope gradients of as little as one degree. Lateral spreading typically damages pipelines, utilities, bridges, and structures. Lateral spreading of the ground surface during a seismic activity usually occurs along the weak shear zones within a liquefiable soil layer and has been observed to generally take place toward a free face (i.e. retaining wall, slope, or channel) and to lesser extent on ground surfaces with a very gentle slope. Due to the absence of any channel within or near the Project site, and the subsurface soil conditions that are not conducive to liquefaction, the potential for lateral spread occurring on the Project site is considered to be negligible. As shown above, the Project site is not identified as being located on a geologic unit or soil that has been identified as being unstable or having the potential to result on-site or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, Page 276 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 45 liquefaction or collapse. The Project site is relatively flat and consists of non-native alluvial soils. The Project is required to be constructed in accordance with the CBC. Compliance with existing CBC regulations would limit hazard impacts arising from unstable soils to less than significant levels. Therefore, the Project would not likely result in landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse and no mitigation is required. d) Less than Significant Impact. It is unknown whether the Project would be located on expansive soils. In any case, the Project would be required to be in conformance with the California Building Code, City regulations, and other applicable standards. Conformance with standard engineering practices and adherence to design criteria would reduce impacts related to expansive soil potential to a less than significant level. e) No Impact. The Project proposes to connect to the existing municipal sewer system. The Project would connect to this system and would not require use of septic tanks. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential cumulative impact related to earth and geology is typically site-specific. The analysis herein determined that the Project would not result in any significant impacts related to landform modification, grading, or the destruction of a geologically significant landform or feature with implementation of mitigation. Moreover, existing State and local laws and regulations are in place to protect people and property from substantial adverse geological and soils effects, including fault rupture, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic-induced ground failure (including liquefaction), and landslides. Existing laws and regulations also protect people and property from adverse effects related to soil erosion, expansive soils, loss of topsoil, development on an unstable geologic unit or soil type that could result in on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse. These existing laws and regulations would render potentially adverse geological and soil effects of the Project to a level considered less than significant. Moreover, these existing laws and regulations ensure that past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region do not result in substantial adverse geological and soils effects. As a result, the existing legal and regulatory framework would ensure that the incremental geological and soils effects of the Project would not result in greater adverse cumulative effects when considered together with the effects of other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Rancho Cucamonga region. The impacts of the Project-related to geology and soils would be less than cumulatively considerable. Page 277 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 46 Initial Study 4.7 – Greenhouse Gas Emissions Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. Climate change is the distinct change in measures of climate for a long period of time.17 Climate change is the result of numerous, cumulative sources of greenhouse gas emissions all over the world. Natural changes in climate can be caused by indirect processes such as changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or direct changes within the climate system itself (e.g., changes in ocean circulation). Human activities can affect the atmosphere through emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) and changes to the planet’s surface. Human activities that produce GHGs are the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas for heating and electricity, gasoline and diesel for transportation); methane from landfill wastes and raising livestock, deforestation activities; and some agricultural practices. Greenhouse gases differ from other emissions in that they contribute to the “greenhouse effect.” The greenhouse effect is a natural occurrence that helps regulate the temperature of the planet. The majority of radiation from the Sun hits the Earth’s surface and warms it. The surface in turn radiates heat back towards the atmosphere, known as infrared radiation. Gases and clouds in the atmosphere trap and prevent some of this heat from escaping back into space and re-radiate it in all directions. This process is essential to supporting life on Earth because it warms the planet by approximately 60° Fahrenheit. Emissions from human activities since the beginning of the industrial revolution (approximately 250 years ago) are adding to the natural greenhouse effect by increasing the gases in the atmosphere that trap heat, thereby contributing to an average increase in the Earth’s temperature. Greenhouse gases occur naturally and from human activities. Greenhouse gases produced by human activities include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6). Since 1750, it is estimated that the concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide in the atmosphere have increased over 36 percent, 148 percent, and 18 percent, respectively, primarily due to human activity. Emissions of greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere directly by changing its chemical composition while changes to the land surface indirectly affect the atmosphere by changing the way the Earth absorbs gases from the atmosphere. The County of San Bernardino adopted its Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Plan) in 2011, which provides guidance on how to analyze GHG emissions and determine significance during the CEQA review of proposed development projects within the County of San Bernardino. The reduction strategies in the GHG Plan correspond to reduction measures. Measurable reductions in GHG emissions are achieved through adherence to the County’s DRP procedures. The County’s GHG DRP procedures, updated in 2015, are streamlined by 1) applying a uniform set of performance standards to all development project, and 2) utilizing Screening Tables to mitigate project GHG emissions. Projects have the option of preparing a project- specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate GHG emissions in lieu of the utilizing the Screening Tables. A review standard of 3,000 MT CO2e per year is used to identify projects that require the use of Screening Tables or a project-specific technical analysis to quantify and mitigate project emissions. Page 278 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 47 Projects that exceed the 3,000 MTCO2e per year are required to either achieve a minimum 100 points per the Screening Tables or a 31% reduction over 2007 emissions levels. Consistent with CEQA guidelines, such projects would be determined to have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. The car wash project will include activities that emit greenhouse gas emissions over the short- and long-term. While one Project could not be said to cause global climate change, individual Projects contribute cumulatively to greenhouse gas emissions that result in climate change. A greenhouse gas emissions inventory was prepared for the Project and is analyzed below. Short-Term Emissions The Project will result in short-term greenhouse gas emissions from activities associated with construction of the car wash. Construction assumptions for the proposed Project are discussed in Section 4.3 of this document. Greenhouse gas emissions will be released by equipment used for demolition, site preparation, grading, building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities. GHG emissions will also result from worker and vendor trips to and from the site. Table 9, Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, summarizes the estimated yearly emissions from construction activities. Carbon dioxide emissions from construction equipment and worker/vendor trips were estimated utilizing the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 (see Appendix A). Construction activities are short-term and cease to emit greenhouse gases upon completion, unlike operational emissions that are continuous year after year until operation of the use ceases. Because of this difference, SCAQMD recommends in its draft threshold to amortize construction emissions over a 30- year operational lifetime. This normalizes construction emissions so that they can be grouped with operational emissions in order to generate an approximate Project GHG inventory. Amortized car wash construction emissions are included in Table 9. Table 9 Car Wash Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Construction Year GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* 2019 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 TOTAL 126.76 0.02 0.00 127.29 AMORTIZED TOTAL^ 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 * MTCO2E Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding and variations in modeling software ^ Amortized over 30-years Long-Term Emissions The proposed car wash/detail center activities will result in continuous greenhouse gas emissions from mobile and operational sources. Mobile sources including vehicle trips to and from the development will result primarily in emissions of CO2 with minor emissions of CH4 and N2O. The most significant GHG emission from natural gas usage will be methane. Electricity usage by the Project and indirect usage of electricity for water and wastewater conveyance will result primarily in emissions of carbon dioxide. Disposal of solid waste will result in emissions of methane from the decomposition of waste at landfills coupled with CO2 emission from the handling and transport of solid waste. These sources combine to define the long-term greenhouse gas emissions for construction of the car wash. To determine long-term emissions, CalEEMod was used. The methodology utilized for each emissions source is based on the CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures handbook.18 A summary of the car wash’s net long-term greenhouse gas emissions is included in Table 10, Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Mobile sources are based on annual vehicle miles traveled (VMT) based on daily trip generation identified in the Project traffic report.19 Natural gas usage and electricity usage are based on default demand figures utilized in CalEEMod. Solid waste generation is also based on CalEEMod defaults. Emissions are presented as metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2E) meaning that all emissions have been weighted based on their Global Warming Potential (GWP) (a metric ton is equal to 1.102 US short tons). Page 279 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 48 Initial Study Table 10 Car Wash Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Source GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Area 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy 36.23 0.00 0.00 36.38 Mobile 766.55 0.04 0.00 767.57 Solid Waste 5.65 0.33 0.00 14.01 Water/Wastewater 10.05 0.06 0.00 12.08 TOTAL 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 * MTCO2E/YR Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Table 11, Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory, summarizes the yearly estimated greenhouse gas emissions from construction and operational sources. The total yearly carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for the car wash are estimated at 834.28 MTCO2E. This does not exceed the established GHG emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2E per year. Impacts from the proposed car wash development will be less than significant. Table 11 Car Wash Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Source GHG Emissions (MT/YR) CO2 CH4 N2O TOTAL* Construction 4.23 0.00 0.00 4.23 Operation 818.47 0.44 0.00 830.05 Total 834.28 Significance Threshold 3,000 Significant Impact? No * MTCO2E/YR Note: Slight variations may occur due to rounding ^ Construction impacts amortized over 30-years b) Less than Significant Impact. As shown above, the Project would be consistent with the County of San Bernardino GHG Plan. Additionally, the Project’s consistency with AB 32 and Senate Bill (SB) 32 are discussed below. AB 32 Consistency. AB 32 was adopted in 2006 and requires California to reduce its GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. CARB identified reduction measures to achieve this goal as set forth in the CARB Scoping Plan. Thus, projects that are consistent with the CARB Scoping Plan are also consistent with AB 32 goal. The Project would generate GHG emissions, directly and indirectly, from a variety of sources. The CARB Scoping Plan includes strategies for implementation at the statewide level to meet the goals of AB 32. These strategies serve as statewide measures to reduce GHG emissions levels. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Therefore, the Project would not conflict or otherwise interfere with implementation of AB 32. SB 32 Consistency. SB 32 was adopted in 2016 and requires the state to reduce statewide GHG emissions 40% below 1990 levels by 2030. SB 32 codifies the reduction target issued in Executive Order B-30-15. SB 32 builds upon the AB 32 goal of 1990 levels by 2020 and provides an interim goal to achieving Executive Order S-3-05’s 2050 reduction goal of 80% below 1990 levels. Page 280 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 49 The CARB 2017 Scoping Plan identified reduction measures to achieve the SB 32 GHG reduction goal. Like the previously adopted Scoping Plans, the 2017 Scoping Plan includes statewide reduction measures that are implemented at the state level. The Project would be subject to the applicable measures established in the 2017 Scoping Plan because these measures are implemented at the state level. Additionally, the 2014 Scoping Plan Update indicates "California is on track to meet the near-term 2020 greenhouse gas limit and is well positioned to maintain and continue reductions beyond 2020 as required by AB 32"; and it recognizes the potential for California to "reduce emissions by 2030 to levels squarely in line with those needed in the developed world and to stay on track to reduce emissions to 80% below 1990 levels by 2050." Moreover, the Project does not propose facilities or operations that would substantively interfere with any future County- mandated, state-mandated, or federally-mandated regulations enacted or promulgated to legally require development to assist in meeting state-adopted GHG emissions reduction targets, including those established under Executive Order S-3-05, Executive Order B-30-15, SB 32, or the 2017 Scoping Plan. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with implementation of SB 32 or otherwise interfere with implementation of this or future goals. Cumulative Impacts GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emission impacts from a climate change perspective. As discussed above, the Project’s emissions would be below the County’s threshold for of 3,000 MT per year of CO2e for commercial projects and would not conflict with applicable plans. Thus, the Project’s cumulative contribution of GHG emissions would be less than significant. Page 281 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 50 Initial Study 4.8 – Hazards and Hazardous Materials Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? □ □ □ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? □ □ □ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? □ □ □ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area? □ □ □ g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? □ □ □ Page 282 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 51 Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in a significant hazard to the public if it includes the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or places housing near a facility, which routinely transports, uses, or disposes of hazardous materials. The Project is located within a commercial and residential area and is bound by surface streets, commercial, uses and vacant land. The Project would not place housing near any hazardous materials facilities. The routine use, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials is primarily associated with industrial uses, which require such materials for manufacturing operations or produce hazardous wastes as by-products of production applications. The Project includes an express car wash and a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential on the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site and does not propose or facilitate any activity involving significant use, routine transport, or disposal of hazardous substances. Construction of the car wash would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents. Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products. Construction would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete. All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. With regard to Project operation, widely used hazardous materials common at commercial uses include paints and other solvents, cleaners, and pesticides. Operation of the proposed car wash would involve the use of cleaning solutions for daily operation and paints for routine maintenance and re-coating of structures. The remnants of these and other products are disposed of as household hazardous waste (HHW) that includes used dead batteries, electronic wastes, and other wastes that are prohibited or discouraged from being disposed of at local landfills. Through compliance with existing regulations, use of common household hazardous materials and their disposal does not present a substantial health risk to the community. Impacts associated with the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials or wastes would be less than significant. b) Less than Significant Impact. According to the State Water Resources Control Board, there are no open cases of leaking underground storage tanks (LUST) within one-quarter mile of the Project site.20 The property located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald that is scheduled to be developed with a gas station, is the site of a former gas station and a former LUST cleanup site. This case has been closed since 2001, and according to the Project Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA), performed by RGS Engineering Geology, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the site, is considered low (See Appendix C, Phase I ESA). There would be a less than significant impact related to the release of hazardous materials into the environment as a result of development of the proposed car wash and adoption of the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change. Construction of the Project would require the use and transport of hazardous materials such as asphalt, paints, and other solvents. Construction activities could also produce hazardous wastes associated with the use of such products. Construction of the proposed express car wash would require ordinary construction activities and would not require a substantial or uncommon amount of hazardous materials to complete. All hazardous materials are required to be utilized and transported in Page 283 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 52 Initial Study accordance with their labeling pursuant to federal and state law. Routine construction practices include good housekeeping measures to prevent/contain/clean-up spills and contamination from fuels, solvents, concrete wastes and other waste materials. Impacts would be less than significant. Activities associated with the demolition of the existing single-family home may pose a hazard with regard to asbestos containing materials (ACM) and lead-based paints. ACM were used on a widespread basis in building construction prior to and into the 1980s; therefore, it is assumed that ACM is present on the Project site and will need to be handled following specific regulations/guidelines described below. Asbestos generally does not pose a threat when it remains intact. When asbestos is disturbed it becomes airborne. SCAQMD Rule 1403 (Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities) requires work practices that limit asbestos emissions from building demolition and renovation activities, including the removal and disturbance of ACM.21 This rule is designed to protect uses and persons adjacent to demolition or renovation activity from exposure to asbestos emissions. Rule 1403 requires a certified inspector to survey any facility being demolished or renovated for the presence of all friable and Class I and Class II non-friable ACM. The applicant must also notify SCAQMD of their intent to perform demolition or renovation of any buildings that may contain asbestos prior to demolition and requires that all ACM is removed prior to any demolition. Rule 1403 also establishes notification procedures, removal procedures, handling and clean-up procedures, storage, disposal, landfilling requirements, and warning label requirements, including HEPA filtration, the “glovebag” method, wetting, and some methods of dry removal that must be implemented when disturbing appreciable amounts of ACM (more than 100 square feet of surface area). All ACM shall be disposed of at a waste disposal site operated in accordance with Rule 1403. The applicant will also ensure the safety of construction workers involved in the ACM removal by complying with all California Asbestos Standards in Construction, including, but not limited to minimum air circulations, use of respirators, wetting of materials, clothing laundering, construction and demolition equipment requirements, and shielding specifications. Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 1403 would ensure that impacts related to the release of ACM are less than significant. Exposure of construction workers to lead-based paint during demolition activities is also of concern, similar to exposure to asbestos. Exposure of surrounding land uses to lead from demolition activities is generally not a concern because demolition activities do not result in appreciable emissions of lead.22 The primary emitters of lead are industrial processes. Any lead- based paint utilized on the exterior and interior of the existing single-family home would generally remain inside the structure or close to the exterior of the building and would be removed during demolition. Improper disposal of lead-based paint could contaminate soil and subsurface groundwater in and under landfills not properly equipped to handle hazardous levels of this material. Due to the age of the buildings it is assumed that lead-based paint is present. Therefore, 8 CCR Section 1532.1 (California Construction Safety Orders for Lead) must be followed for the demolition of all existing structures requiring exposure assessment and compliance measures to keep worker exposure below action levels. The Project is also subject to Title 22 requirements for the disposal of solid waste contaminated with excessive levels of lead. Testing, monitoring, containment, and disposal of lead-based materials will comply with all Cal/OSHA standards and regulations under California Construction Safety Orders for Lead section 1532. Adherence to standard regulation would ensure that impacts related to the release of lead based paints would be less than significant. With regard to operation, the proposed car wash would not involve the use of hazardous materials or generate hazardous waste that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. Project operation would involve the use of solvents, cleaners, and waxes used for typical car wash operations, and with compliance with existing regulations, would not pose a significant risk to the environment or humans. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. There is a special education school located approximately 200 feet to the north of the Project site (Mulberry Early Education Center). However, as mentioned above, the Project would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. Impacts will be less than significant. Page 284 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 53 d) No Impact. The Project is not located on a site listed on the state Cortese List, a compilation of various sites throughout the state that have been compromised due to soil or groundwater contamination from past uses. 23 Based upon review of the Cortese List, the Project site is not:  listed as a hazardous waste and substance site by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC),24  listed as a leaking underground storage tank (LUFT) site by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB),25  listed as a hazardous solid waste disposal site by the SWRCB,26  currently subject to a Cease and Desist Order (CDO) or a Cleanup and Abatement Order (CAO) as issued by the SWRCB,27 or  developed with a hazardous waste facility subject to corrective action by the DTSC.28 No impact will occur in relation to hazardous materials sites. e-f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.29 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25- miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. g) Less than Significant Impact. Per state Fire and Building Codes, sufficient space will have to be provided around the buildings for emergency personnel and equipment access and emergency evacuation. All Project elements, including landscaping, would be sited with sufficient clearance from existing and proposed structures so as not to interfere with emergency access to and evacuation from the facility. The car wash will be required to comply with the California Fire Code as adopted by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Chapter 15.04.010). The car wash site plan includes one ingress/egress access point via a 50-foot wide driveway on Arrow Route. The car wash driveway would be constructed to California Fire Code specifications and would allow emergency access and evacuation from the site. The Project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan because no permanent public street or lane closures are proposed. Construction work in the street associated with the buildings would be limited to lateral utility connections would be limited to nominal potential traffic diversion. Project impacts would be less than significant. h) No Impact. The Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, as identified on the latest Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ) maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE).30 There are no wildland conditions in the urbanized area where the Project site is located. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The incremental effects of the Project related to hazards and hazardous materials, if any, are anticipated to be minimal, and any effects would be site-specific. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to hazards or hazardous materials that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to or from hazards or hazardous materials. Page 285 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 54 Initial Study 4.9 – Hydrology and Water Quality Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? □ □ □ b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? □ □ □ c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? □ □ □ d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? □ □ □ e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? □ □ □ f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? □ □ □ g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? □ □ □ h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? □ □ □ Page 286 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 55 Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? □ □ □ j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. A project normally would have an impact on surface water quality if discharges associated with the project would create pollution, contamination, or nuisance as defined in Water Code § 13050, or that cause regulatory standards to be violated as defined in the applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater permit or Water Quality Control Plan for the receiving water body. For the purpose of this specific issue, a significant impact could occur if the proposed Project would discharge water that does not meet the quality standards of the agencies that regulate surface water quality and water discharge into stormwater drainage systems. Significant impacts could also occur if the Project does not comply with all applicable regulations with regard to surface water quality as governed by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). These regulations include preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to reduce potential water quality impacts during construction activity (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.190) and the implementation of post-construction best management practices (BMPs) such as detention basins, infiltration ponds, porous pavement, sand and organic filters, etc. (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 19.20.110). Construction Impacts Three general sources of potential short-term, construction-related stormwater pollution associated with the Project include: 1) the handling, storage, and disposal of construction materials containing pollutants; 2) the maintenance and operation of construction equipment; and 3) earth-moving activities which, when not controlled, may generate soil erosion via storm runoff or mechanical equipment. All new development Projects equal to one acre or more are subject to San Bernardino County NPDES Permit No. CAS618036. The car wash development would disturb approximately 1.36 acres of land and therefore will be subject to NPDES permit requirements during construction activities. In addition, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) will be prepared and submitted for the proposed Project. All construction projects must apply BMPs that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion. Compliance with City discharge requirements would ensure that construction of the Project would not violate any water quality standards or discharge requirements, or otherwise substantially degrade water quality. Impacts would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. Operational Impacts An Infiltration Testing Report was prepared by Christopher Krall, P.G. of RGS Engineering Geology, dated September 12, 2018 (See Appendix H). The purpose of the testing was to determine the vertical infiltration rate of stormwater infiltration for the soil below the site in order to include the appropriate storage capacity for the proposed infiltration basin. Proposed construction will increase impervious areas on the Project site as the site currently consists of mostly impervious surfaces. The approximately 1.36-acre site will be replaced with a car wash structure, vacuum area, detail center, and associated paving and landscaping. Runoff from the developed site would result in increased potential water contamination from urban pollutants that are commonly found in surface parking lots, ornamental landscape planters and from atmospheric buildup on rooftops. Runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the existing storm drain system under Arrow Route. The Project would Page 287 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 56 Initial Study be subject to post-construction BMPs to address increases in impervious surfaces, methods to decrease incremental increases in off-site stormwater flows, and methods for decreasing pollutant loading in off-site discharges. A key design criterion is to treat the first ¾-inch rainstorm flows, since the first rains typically carry the most concentrated levels of pollution that have built up since the last storm. Common post-construction BMPs include retaining stormwater on-site to filter back into the groundwater. The car wash development would consist of approximately 15,607 square feet of landscaped area along the boundaries of the site and in landscaped planters in the interior of the site, comprising approximately 26% of the overall site total. An additional 10-foot landscaping dedication will be included along the car wash’s southern boundary with the sidewalk on Arrow Route, totaling 2,660 square feet of additional landscaping. These landscaped areas would serve as bio swales for runoff collection and treatment. As previously mentioned, the car wash development includes a water runoff retention basin near the south-central portion of the site that will act to treat flows before being discharged into the Municipal storm drain system. Landscaped areas and on-site storm drainage facilities will collect stormwater to be conveyed to the bio swales for treatment, and then pumped to the City storm drainage system on Arrow Route. The proposed Project would not generate hazardous wastewater that would require any special waste discharge permits. All wastewater associated with the building’s interior plumbing system would be discharged into the local sewer system for treatment at the regional wastewater treatment plant. Although the amount of impervious surface would be greater than existing conditions, runoff would be captured on site and conveyed through a proposed on-site storm drainage system that includes water treatment at the site’s various bio swales prior to being discharged into the municipal storm drain at Arrow Route. Impacts associated with operation of the proposed Project would be less than significant with implementation of existing regulations. b) Less than Significant Impact. If the Project removes an existing groundwater recharge area or substantially reduces runoff that results in groundwater recharge such that existing wells would no longer be able to operate, a potentially significant impact could occur. As described in the Infiltration Testing Report, groundwater was encountered in both exploratory trench excavations at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. In general, groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface. Project-related grading would only go a few feet below the surface and would not reach the depth of the groundwater table. No disturbance of groundwater is anticipated. The proposed building footprint and pavement area would increase impervious surface coverage on the site, thereby reducing the total amount of infiltration onsite. However, infiltration of irrigation water through soil and water from runoff through soft-bottom channels would ensure continued groundwater recharge in Rancho Cucamonga as impervious surfaces increase. The Project site is not utilized for groundwater recharge and will include landscaped areas that would serve as infiltration. Because this site is not managed for groundwater supplies and would provide landscaped areas for continued infiltration, this change in infiltration would not have a significant effect on groundwater table level. Impacts related to development of the proposed Project would be less than significant. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts to the existing drainage pattern of the site or area could occur if development of the Project results in substantial on- or off-site erosion or siltation. Stormwater would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio swales and an infiltration basin for treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system in Arrow Route. Therefore, the drainage pattern would not be substantially altered in a manner that could cause increases in erosion off-site. Erosion and siltation reduction measures would be implemented during construction. At the completion of construction, the site would consist of impervious surfaces and would therefore not be prone to substantial erosion. No streams cross the Project site; thus, the Project would not alter any stream course. Impacts would be less than significant. d-e) Less than Significant Impact. No streams traverse the Project site; thus, the Project would not result in the alteration of any stream course. During construction, the Project applicant would be required to comply with drainage and runoff guidelines pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 19.20. With regard to Project operation, construction of the car wash would increase the net area of impermeable surfaces on the site; therefore, increased discharges to the City’s existing storm drain system would likely occur. As shown on the Project sit e plans, stormwater associated with the proposed Project would be collected on site and conveyed to the various on-site bio Page 288 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 57 swales for treatment and then conveyed to the City’s storm drainage system at Arrow Route. Permits to connect to the existing storm drainage system would be obtained prior to construction. All drainage plans are subject to City review and approval. These requirements would apply to the proposed Project. Therefore, the increase in discharges would not impact local storm drain capacity. The Project is not an industrial use and therefore would not result in substantial pollutant loading such that treatment control BMPs would be required to protect downstream water quality. In addition, as mentioned above, runoff from the car wash itself would not occur, as all waste water used in the car wash will be retained in the car wash building and recycled and reused in future car wash operations. Post-construction BMP’s, as described above, would ensure the Project would not result in substantial pollutant loading. Impacts related to the proposed Project Change would be less than significant. f) Less than Significant Impact. The Project does not propose any uses that could have the potential to otherwise degrade water quality beyond those issues discussed in Section 4.9 herein. Impacts would be less than significant. g & h) No Impact. According to flood maps prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Project site is not located within a 100-year flood floodplain.31 No impact would occur. i) No Impact. According to the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Health and Safety Element, the Project site is not located within a dam inundation area.32 No impact would result. j) No Impact. The City is not exposed to tsunami hazards due to its inland location. In addition, no large water bodies that would pose potential for seiche are located in the Project area. The potential for mudflows is unlikely given the site’s distance from hillside and mountainous terrain. No impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The potential impacts related to hydrology and storm water runoff are typically site-specific BMPs are implemented at the project level. The analysis above determined that the implementation of the Project would not result in significant impacts. Therefore, the Project would have a less than significant impact under most hydrology criteria, and therefore could not contribute toward a cumulative impact. In regard to Project impacts that would be considered less than significant, such impacts are not expected to result in compounded or increased impacts when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects, as other projects would be subject to similar laws and requirements regarding hydrology practices. Page 289 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 58 Initial Study 4.10 – Land Use and Planning Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Physically divide an established community? □ □ □ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? □ □ □ c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and south, a school to the north, and residential uses to the east. The site is currently designated in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Code for General Commercial uses on Parcel 1, and Low Medium Density Residential on Parcel 2. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on Parcel 2 from Low Medium Density Residential to General Commercial, bringing the entire Project site under the same General Commercial designation. The Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. Therefore, the Project is consistent and compatible with the surrounding land uses. The Project does not involve construction of any roadway, flood control channel, or other structure that would physically divide any portion of the community. Therefore, no impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. Parcel 1 is designated as General Commercial in the City’s General Plan and is zoned (GC) General Commercial. However, Parcel 2 is designated as Low Medium Density Residential in the General Plan, and zoned (LM) Low Medium (4-8 du/ac) residential. The Project includes a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change for Parcel 2 in order to make the site consistent. Section 17.34 (General Development Standards) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code provides general site development standards for commercial uses. The primary purpose of the General Commercial zone is to provide for general shopping with a variety of business, retail, personal, and related or similar services. The Project does not conflict with the intent or implementation of this designation as it allows for a variety of businesses and related services, of which a car wash and detail center would be. Furthermore, the Project would maintain the integrity of the commercial areas to the west and south in terms of density, use, and design. As previously mentioned, the Project Application also includes a General Plan Amendment to the two parcels immediately to the east of the Project site from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential. The Project does not include any feature that would circumvent any mitigating policies in the Rancho Cucamonga General Plan. Impacts would be less than significant. c) No Impact. As discussed in Section 4.4.f above, the Project site is not located within any habitat conservation plan or community conservation plan. Therefore, no impact will occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project does not conflict with any existing land use regulations and therefore could not contribute towards any cumulative impacts. The Project does not propose any new roadways or other significant infrastructure improvements that would restrict Page 290 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 59 access or require a diversion for existing travel routes. The Project does not result in an impact on any sensitive plant or animal species covered by a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan, nor does it hinder the implementation or establishing of such plans. For these reasons, the Project would not cumulatively contribute to land use conflicts and potential impacts are considered less than cumulative considerable. Page 291 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 60 Initial Study 4.11 – Mineral Resources Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? □ □ □ b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? □ □ □ a-b) No Impact. The Project site is located in an almost completely urbanized area characterized by residential and commercial development and some vacant land. The Project site is not shown in the City’s General Plan to be within an area defined by regionally significant aggregate resources and there are no mineral extractions or process facilities on or near the site.33 No mineral resources are known to exist within the vicinity. Impacts related to the proposed car wash and General Plan Amendment and Zone Change would not occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to mineral resources. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to mineral resources that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. Thus, no cumulative impacts related to mineral resources would occur. Page 292 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 61 4.12 – Noise Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? □ □ □ b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? □ □ □ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? □ □ □ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project? □ □ □ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the Project expose people residing or working in the Project area to excessive noise levels? □ □ □ Roadway Construction Noise Modeling was performed and is included as Appendix D. A Project Operational Noise Assessment was prepared by Jeremy Louden, Principal, of Ldn Consulting, Inc. and dated August 28, 2019. A Project Construction Noise Assessment was also prepared by Mr. Louden, and is dated January 7, 2019. These reports are included as Appendix E, Noise Analyses.34 35 Fundamentals of Sound and Environmental Noise Noise can be defined as unwanted sound. Sound (and therefore noise) consists of energy waves that people receive and interpret. Sound pressure levels are described in logarithmic units of ratios of sound pressures to a reference pressure, squared. These units are called bels. In order to provide a finer description of sound, a bel is subdivided into ten decibels, abbreviated dB. To account for the range of sound that human hearing perceives, a modified scale is utilized known as the A- weighted decibel (dBA). Since decibels are logarithmic units, sound pressure levels cannot be added or subtracted by ordinary arithmetic means. For example, if one automobile produces a sound pressure level of 70 dBA when it passes an observer, two cars passing simultaneously would not produce 140 dBA. In fact, they would combine to produce 73 dBA. This same principle can be applied to other traffic quantities as well. In other words, doubling the traffic volume on a street or the speed Page 293 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 62 Initial Study of the traffic will increase the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. Conversely, halving the traffic volume or speed will reduce the traffic noise level by 3 dBA. A 3 dBA change in sound is the beginning at which humans generally notice a barely perceptible change in sound and a 5 dBA change is generally readily perceptible.36 Noise consists of pitch, loudness, and duration; therefore, a variety of methods for measuring noise have been developed. According to the California General Plan Guidelines for Noise Elements, the following are common metrics for measuring noise:37 LEQ (Equivalent Energy Noise Level): The sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time-varying signal over given sample periods. LEQ is typically computed over 1-, 8-, and 24-hour sample periods. CNEL (Community Noise Equivalent Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after addition of five decibels to sound levels in the evening from 7:00pm to 10:00pm and after addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night from 10:00pm to 7:00am. LDN (Day-Night Average Level): The average equivalent A-weighted sound level during a 24-hour day, obtained after the addition of ten decibels to sound levels in the night after 10:00pm and before 7:00am. CNEL and LDN are utilized for describing ambient noise levels because they account for all noise sources over an extended period of time and account for the heightened sensitivity of people to noise during the night. LEQ is better utilized for describing specific and consistent sources because of the shorter reference period. City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code The City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, under Section 17.66.050 – Noise Standards, provides the local government ordinance relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Operational Noise Standards Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. Construction Noise Restrictions To control noise associated with the construction of the proposed Project the City of Rancho Cucamonga has established permitted hours of operation and noise level limits. According to Section 17.66.050(D)(4)(a) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code the following activities are exempt from the provisions of the noise standards:  When adjacent to a residential land use, school, church or similar type of use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday, or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and provided that noise levels created do not exceed the base noise level standard of 65 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line.  When adjacent to a commercial or industrial use, the noise generating activity does not take place between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. on weekdays, including Saturday and Sunday, and provided noise levels created do not exceed the standards of 70 dBA at the adjacent property line. Based on the nearby residential and school uses, the permitted hours of construction activity at the Project site shall be between 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. In addition, the noise level standard of 65 dBA Leq shall apply to noise levels generated by Project construction at the nearby Page 294 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 63 land uses. If the Project demonstrates compliance with these standards, the construction noise level impacts are considered exempt from the noise standards. Existing Noise Environment Noise level measurements were conducted by Ldn Consulting between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on “slow” response and “A- weighting.” The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 12, Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements, provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Appendix E. Table 12 Summary of Existing Noise Level Measurements ID Location Description Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmin Lmax 1 Central of site at northern property line – set back from roadways. 63.4 37.1 90.8 Source: Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment. August 28, 2019. a, c, d) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (Section 17.66.050) sets allowable levels for residential and commercial land uses. Exterior noise exposure for residential use is allowable up to 60 dBA and for commercial uses is allowable up to 65 dBA. Construction Noise Levels As previously mentioned, short-term construction noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc. and presented in a Noise study dated January 7, 2018. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a rubber tire dozer, a backhoe, power tools, concrete mixers and paving machine that can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur from grading, building construction, and paving activities. This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken at similar sites and construction activities to describe the typical construction noise levels for each stage of Project construction. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 65 dBA Leq to in excess of 80 dBA Leq when measured at 50 feet. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA Leq per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA Leq measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA Leq at 100 feet from the source to the receiver and would be further reduced to 68 dBA Leq at 200 feet from the source to the receiver. According to the project’s contractor, grading of the project will occur all in a single phase using a single rubber-tired dozer. No water truck will be required due to the size of the sight, access to a water supply line and the fact that the grading operations will only occur for 2-3 weeks. Trenching and underground earthwork will be completed using a single backhoe. Building construction will consist of concrete trucks and paving activities will utilize a paving machine. To determine the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Table 13, Construction Reference Noise Levels, provides a summary of the construction reference noise level measurements. Table 13 Construction Reference Noise Levels Noise Source Reference Distance from Source (Feet) Reference Noise Levels @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Reference Noise Levels @ 100 Feet (dBA Leq)5 Grading Activities1 50 73.5 67.5 Foundation Trenching2 50 68.2 62.2 Building Construction3 50 67.2 61.2 Paving Activities4 50 70.4 64.4 1 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 9/3/15 at a construction site located in the Ramona. Page 295 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 64 Initial Study 2 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 6/20/16 at a construction site located in Corona. 3 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 4/10/18 at a commercial construction site located in San Jacinto. 4 As measured by Ldn Consulting on 10/30/18 during roadway construction in San Diego. 5 Reference noise levels are calculated at 100 feet using a drop off rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. The dozer will be moving along the property line and then moving away from the property line as needed to complete the finished site elevations. Therefore, the dozer would be adjacent to property line for only a short period of time and then moving away from that same location by at least 100-150 feet, in a loop or sweeping motion. The acoustical center of the activities, on an hourly basis, would be in between those two distances from the property line. An example of how the dozer would move around the site is provided in Figure 2 of the Construction Noise Assessment. Trenching, building construction and paving activities will also move around the site. Typically, the equipment will be more than 50 feet from the nearest sensitive receptors. To be conservative, and average distance of 50 feet was used to determine potential impacts. Utilizing the noise levels from Table 13 above, at an average distance of 50 feet, the construction noise levels from each phase would exceed the City’s 65 dBA hourly threshold. Table 14, Construction Noise Level Reductions Required, summarizes the maximum noise levels at each of the studied receivers. Therefore, inclusion of Mitigation Measure NOI-1 is required to reduce temporary construction noise impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measure NOI-1 requires installation of temporary noise attenuation barriers will be installed along the northern and eastern property lines during the grading operations. It is recommended that the temporary barriers stay in place until all construction activities are completed. In addition, Mitigation Measure NOI-1 includes requirements for construction hours, combustion-engine equipment, equipment staging areas, equipment idling, loading and unloading of materials, public communication. These measures are discussed in more detail below Table 14 Construction Noise Level Reductions Required Noise Source Reference Noise Levels @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Noise Reduction Needed to Achieve 65 Decibels (dBA)1 Resultant Noise Levels (dBA) Grading Activities1 73.5 -8.5 65 Foundation Trenching2 68.2 -3.2 65 Building Construction3 67.2 -2.2 65 Paving Activities4 70.4 -5.4 65 1 Temporary noise barrier needed to achieve additional reductions. Construction Noise Mitigation The Fresnel Diffraction Method was utilized for determining the relative noise reduction associated with a temporary wooden noise attenuation wall. The proposed noise attenuation wall would need to be 6-foot high and located at the property line to break the line of sight from the equipment at the adjacent property. The attenuation wall would reduce mid octave-band (250- Hz and 500-Hz) sound levels associated with typical construction activities between 8.5 dB and 10.1 dB. The reduction is dependent upon the source elevation and the topography between the source and receptor. The effective mitigated sound level at the nearest occupied residential area is therefore anticipated to be at or below 65 decibels (73.5 dB minus 8.5 dB) with the incorporation of the 6-foot high temporary noise attenuation barrier. Impacts are anticipated to be less than significant with inclusion of the temporary noise attenuation barrier and no further mitigation is required for the proposed grading activities. Mitigation Measures NOI-1: The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction:  Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, hay bales, or any other suitable material such that a minimum reduction Page 296 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 65 of 8.5 dBA is achieved at the nearest sensitive land use. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction:  Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays.  All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment.  The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction.  Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited.  The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site.  If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Operational Noise levels Pursuant to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. As previously mentioned, long-term operational noise impacts were analyzed by Ldn Consulting Inc., and presented in a Noise study dated August 28, 2019. A substantial increase in ambient noise is an increase that is barely perceptible (3 dBA). The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles along the eastern edge of Parcel 2. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system. The car wash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north. The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3 of the Operational Noise Assessment. The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The modeling includes a 6-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA (See Appendix E). Receptors used in the noise modeling (Figure 4 of the Noise Study) do not represent actual noise sensitive land uses. The receptor locations that were chosen for the analysis are located on the Project site and are for noise modeling purposes only. However, these receptor locations are located closer to the Project site than actual existing noise sensitive receptors located at the residential uses to the east and the elementary school to the north. Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SoundPLAN Essential, version 4.1, a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package (NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO Page 297 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 66 Initial Study Standard 9613-2, “Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data. The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impacts, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time due to the fact that wind patterns fluctuate. Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver. Acoustically hard sites include surfaces, such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off-site uses are considered acoustically soft, or absorptive, therefore, an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. Elevations were taken from the project plans. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 15, Operational Reference Noise Levels(dBA), below. Table 15 Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) Noise Source Number of Sources Reference Sound Power Level1 Car Wash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 4 80.0 1 Reference Noise Level provided in Operational Noise Assessment Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific modeled receptor locations are shown in Table 16, Operational Noise Levels (dBA), below. The results of the noise modeling along with the modeled receptor locations are shown in Figure 4 of the Operational Noise Analysis. As shown in Table 16, noise levels would not exceed the City’s standard of 65 dBA at the modeled receptor locations with incorporation of Mitigation Measure NOI-1. Because the nearest sensitive receptors are located further away than the modeled receptor locations, noise levels would be even lower at these locations due to distance attenuation. Therefore, with mitigation incorporated, operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at nearby sensitive land uses. Table 16 Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Modeled Receptor Location With Mitigation Measures R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 * Noise levels are hourly averages (Leq) Mitigation Measures NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. Page 298 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 67 b) Less than Significant Impact. Vibration is the movement of mass over time. It is described in terms of frequency and amplitude and unlike sound; there is no standard way of measuring and reporting amplitude. Vibration can be described in units of velocity (inches per second) or discussed in decibel (dB) units in order to compress the range of numbers required to describe vibration. Vibration impacts to buildings are generally discussed in terms of peak particle velocity (PPV) that describes particle movement over time (in terms of physical displacement of mass). For purposes of this analysis, PPV will be used to describe all vibration for ease of reading and comparison. Vibration can impact people, structures, and sensitive equipment.38 The primary concern related to vibration and people is the potential to annoy those working and residing in the area. Vibration with high enough amplitudes can damage structures (such as crack plaster or destroy windows). Groundborne vibration can also disrupt the use of sensitive medical and scientific instruments such as electron microscopes. Common sources of vibration within communities include construction activities and railroads. Operation of the Project does not include uses that cause vibration. Groundborne vibration generated by construction projects is usually highest during pile driving, rock blasting, soil compacting, jack hammering, and demolition-related activities. Next to pile driving, grading activity has the greatest potential for vibration impacts if large bulldozers, large trucks, or other heavy equipment are used. The construction of the car wash would not require the use of equipment such as pile drivers, which are known to generate substantial construction vibration levels. According to the Caltrans vibration manual, large bulldozers, vibratory rollers (used to compact earth), and loaded trucks utilized during grading activities can produce vibration, and depending on the level of vibration, could cause annoyance at uses within the Project vicinity or damage structures. Caltrans has developed a screening tool to determine of vibration from construction equipment is substantial enough to impact surrounding uses. The Caltrans vibration manual establishes thresholds for vibration impacts on buildings and humans. These thresholds are summarized in Tables 17, Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria, and Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria. Table 17 Vibration Damage Potential Threshold Criteria Structural Integrity Maximum PPV (in/sec) Transient Continuous Historic and some older buildings 0.50 0.25 Older residential structures 0.50 0.30 New residential structures 1.00 0.50 Modern industrial and commercial structures 2.00 0.50 Source: Caltrans 2013 Table 18 Vibration Annoyance Potential Threshold Criteria Human Response PPV Threshold (in/sec) Transient Continuous Barely perceptible 0.035 0.012 Distinctly perceptible 0.24 0.035 Strongly perceptible 0.90 0.10 Severely perceptible 2.00 0.40 Source: Caltrans 2013 Construction of the car wash would not require rock blasting, or pile driving, but could require use a vibratory roller, small bulldozer, loaded trucks, and jackhammer. Construction activities that use vibratory rollers and bulldozers are repetitive sources of vibration; therefore, the continuous threshold is used. Commercial and residential uses adjacent to the Project site are located to the north and east, respectively. As a worst-case scenario, the historic and some older buildings threshold is used. Based on the threshold criteria summarized in Tables 17 and 18, vibration from use of heavy construction equipment for the Project would be below the thresholds to cause damage to nearby structures at the receptors shown in Table 19, Construction Vibration Impacts. This includes the Beverly Hills House, which will not be directly or indirectly impacted by Page 299 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 68 Initial Study construction vibration. With regard to long-term operational impacts, activities associated with the car wash would not result in any excessive vibration-related impacts to adjacent or on-site properties. All of the receptors will experience barely perceptible vibration from the use of this equipment (See Appendix F, Vibration Calculations). Furthermore, pursuant to the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, these construction activities will be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 8:00 PM. Therefore, the Project would not result in excessive, strongly perceptible vibration. Impacts will be less than significant. Table 19 Construction Vibration Impacts Receptors Equipment PPVref Distance (feet)* PPV 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Vibratory Roller 0.21 82 0.0448 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 0.0136 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Large Bulldozer 0.089 82 0.0190 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 0.0058 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Small Bulldozer 0.003 82 0.0006 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 0.0002 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Loaded Truck 0.076 82 0.0162 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Loaded Truck 0.076 205 0.0049 1 – Single-Family Residence (E) Jackhammer 0.035 82 0.0075 2 – Mulberry Ed. Center (N) Jackhammer 0.035 205 0.0023 Source: MIG 2018. See Appendix E. * Actual distance from center of Project site to receptor. e,f) No Impact. There are no public airports, private airstrips, or heliports within two miles of the Project site.39 The nearest airport is Ontario International Airport, located approximately 3.25-miles to the south. The Project will not exceed 24-feet in height. No impact related to airport operations would occur. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative noise impacts would occur primarily as a result of increased traffic on local roadways due to buildout of the Project and other projects in the vicinity. A project’s contribution to a cumulative traffic noise increase would be considered significant when the combined effect exceeds perception level threshold. The combined effect compares the “cumulative with Project” condition to existing conditions. Although there may be a significant noise increase due to the Project in combination with other related projects (combined effects), it must also be demonstrated that the Project has an incremental effect. In other words, a significant portion of the noise increase must be due to the Project. The following criteria were utilized to evaluate the combined effect of the cumulative noise increase.  Combined Effect. The cumulative with Project noise level “Future With Project” would cause a significant cumulative impact if a 3.0 dB increase over existing condition occurs AND the resulting noise level exceeds the applicable exterior standard at a sensitive use.  Incremental Effect. The “Future With Project” causes a 1.0 dBA increase in noise over the “Future Without Project” noise level.  A significant impact would result only if both the combined and incremental effects criteria have been exceeded. As discussed in Section 4.12.a. above, the proposed Project would not exceed the applicable City exterior noise standard at nearby sensitive uses. Therefore, none of the roadway segments would exceed both the Combined Effect and Incremental Effect criteria because the Combined Effect criteria requires a project to result in noise levels that exceed the applicable exterior noise standard. Therefore, the Project in combination with cumulative background traffic noise levels would result in a less than significant cumulative impact. Page 300 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 69 4.13 – Population and Housing Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? □ □ □ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project would employ between three and six employees and would not induce population growth. No new expanded infrastructure is proposed that could accommodate additional growth in the area that is not already possible with existing infrastructure. No impact would occur. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project site consists of two parcels: one undeveloped parcel and one parcel containing a single-family home. The single-family residence is currently used as a rental property and would be demolished in order to develop the car wash. There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of residential units necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. c) Less than Significant Impact. Displacement, in the context of housing, can generally be defined as persons or groups of persons who have been forced or obliged to flee or to leave their homes or places of habitual residence.40 There is a single- family home located on the site that is currently used as a rental property by one family. There is more than enough housing stock in the City to account for the loss of a single residence. The Project would not displace substantial numbers of people necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Less than significant impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in direct or indirect permanent or temporary impacts related to population or housing. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to population and housing that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. As a result, no cumulative impacts related to population and housing would occur. Page 301 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 70 Initial Study 4.14 – Public Services Would the Project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Fire protection? □ □ □ b) Police protection? □ □ □ c) Schools? □ □ □ d) Parks? □ □ □ e) Other public facilities? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) provides fire protection services for the City. The RCFPD employs over 120 full time and part time employees that serve nearly 170,000 residents in a 50 square mile area. Fire, rescue, emergency medical and hazardous materials incidents are coordinated by an on-duty Battalion Chief supervising cross-trained firefighter/paramedics and firefighter/emergency medical technicians (EMTs) responding from seven fire stations. The RCFPD located closest to the Project site is Fire Station 172, located approximately 0.65 miles north of the Project site at 9612 San Bernardino Road. Development of the car wash as proposed by the Project may incrementally increase the demand for fire protection services. However, development would not increase to a substantial level considering the site’s location and surrounding area of similar uses, and incremental impacts would be offset with payment of Development Impact Fees. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. b) Less than Significant Impact. Police protection services would be provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department. The closest sheriff’s station is located at 10510 Civic Center Drive in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, approximately 1.00 miles east of the Project site. Although a new car wash development would be constructed and operated on the Project site, the Project is in a currently developed area currently served by the County Sheriff’s Department. The Project is not anticipated to increase response times to the Project site or surrounding area. As required for a development of this type, the Project is subject to a law enforcement Development Impact Fee as imposed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The Project does not propose or require new or physically altered police protection facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. c) No Impact. The Project is a non-residential land use. The Cucamonga School District will require development impact fees be paid by the applicant. With payment of the required fees, no significant impact to school services or facilities would occur and no mitigation is required. d) No Impact. The City has established park impact fees to offset the costs associated with increased maintenance and the addition of park facilities resulting from new development. The City’s park impact fees are generated based on the number of residential units in either subdivision or non-subdivision developments. The Project includes development of a car wash and Page 302 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 71 does not have a residential component. As such, the Project would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. Therefore, the impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation is required. e) Less than Significant Impact. The City requires that certain types of development pay impact fees to compensate for additional services provided by public facilities as a result of implementation of their project. The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires development impact fees for libraries and animal centers; however, the Project would not be subject to these impact fees as they are based on the number of residential units proposed by the development. The Project does not include residential uses and would not result in a direct increase in population within the City or surrounding area. Therefore, no impacts to other public facilities would occur with Project implementation and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in a significant impact to any public services or facilities. Therefore, the Project would not result in incremental effects to public services or facilities that could be compounded or increased when considered together with similar effects from other past, present, and reasonably foreseeable probable future projects. The Project would not result in cumulatively considerable impacts to public services or facilities. Page 303 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 72 Initial Study 4.15 – Recreation Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Would the Project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? □ □ □ b) Does the Project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? □ □ □ a) No Impact. The Project does not include development of any residences that could directly generate increased demand for parks and recreational facilities. Implementation of the Project would not generate an increase in demand on existing public or private parks or other recreational facilities that would either result in or increase physical deterioration of the facility. Furthermore, as the Project does not include residential uses, the Project would not be subject to a park impact fee. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. b) No Impact. As previously addressed, the Project does not include residential development and would not create a significant increased demand or need for the construction of park facilities. The Project does not include recreational facilities, nor would it require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impact would result from the Project and no mitigation is required. Cumulative Impacts The Project would not result in an increased use of recreational facilities or require construction or expansion of existing recreational facilities. Therefore, no cumulative impacts on recreational facilities would result from Project implementation. Page 304 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 73 4.16 – Transportation and Traffic Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? □ □ □ □ b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? □ □ □ c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? □ □ □ d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? □ □ □ e) Result in inadequate emergency access? □ □ □ f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? □ □ □ a) No Determination. A traffic impact study was prepared for the Project by Trames Solutions, dated March 20, 2019 (See Appendix G).41 According to the traffic impact study, the Project is estimated to generate 909 additional daily trips, with 50 AM peak hour trips and 89 PM peak hour trips. Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed Project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed Project. However, the following intersection improvements were recommended to address cumulative impacts during the peak hours: Page 305 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 74 Initial Study  Archibald/Arrow Route - Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an unacceptable level of service during the peak hour. Since the project does not directly cause a significant impact at this location, the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. Furthermore, the development on the northeast corner (DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width.  Malvern/Arrow Route - Install a channelized median at the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route to restrict northbound left turns. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $5,000. Since the project does not directly cause the need for this improvement, the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The traffic Study area was established in consultation with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff through the Scoping Letter Agreement process. The traffic study area includes four intersections as listed below: 1. Archibald Avenue/ Arrow Route 2. Malven Avenue/ Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Avenue/ Arrow Route 4. West Project Driveway (Car Wash)/ Arrow Route 5. East Project Driveway (Car Wash)/ Arrow Route Morning and evening peak hour traffic conditions were analyzed for the following scenarios:  Existing (2018) Traffic  Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative (ODAC 2019)  Opening Day + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (ODACP 2019)  Horizon Year (2040) Without Project  Horizon Year (2040) With Project Future traffic analysis is based on a background (ambient) growth of 2% per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service (LOS) as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate LOS conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The LOS results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine LOS. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of LOS is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the LOS has been calculated. Page 306 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 75 The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The LOS criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. The LOS are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Significance Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established LOS “D” as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS “E” or “F” is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. However, pursuant to recent CEQA court case rulings, LOS is no longer considered a significant impact. As such, no impact determination has been made, and the findings of the LOS based traffic impact study prepared by Trames Solutions have been included in this section of the Initial Study Checklist for informational purposes. Existing Conditions (2018) Delay and Level of Service As shown in Table 20, Existing (2018) Conditions, the study area intersections are currently operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or betted) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls. Table 20 Existing (2018) Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route TS 51.9 54.7 D D 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route CSS 28.0 24.3 D C 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route TS 37.4 27.5 D D 4. Project Driveway/Arrow Route -- -- -- -- -- Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2019 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination. Therefore, to account for these trips (termed “ambient growth”), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. To account for traffic not attributed to the project or Page 307 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 76 Initial Study other planned developments within the study area, linear growth between 2018 traffic volumes and San Bernardino Traffic Analysis Model (SBTAM) 2040 forecast has been utilized to estimate ambient growth for opening year (2019) conditions. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development. The land use category for an automated car wash facility (7,293 sf) with a 140-foot long car wash tunnel was used. The number of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation for a car wash facility. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 Xpress car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the number of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 of the Traffic Study were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the Project are shown in Table 21, Project Trip Generation Summary. The proposed Project is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37%, PM-35%) and a 5% internal trip reduction (with the adjacent gas station) was assumed for the car wash. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The Project’s trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the Project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution patterns for the Project are illustrated on Figures 4-A and 4- B of the Project Traffic Study. Table 21 Project Trip Generation Summary Land Use Quantity Peak Hour Daily AM PM In Out Total In Out Total Express Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -- -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -- -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 Car Wash Subtotal 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 Total Project Trips 29 21 50 40 48 89 909 Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash. 1711 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA TSF = thousand square feet Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination. Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project. A 5% reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37% and 35% were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Page 308 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 77 Cumulative Traffic Trip Generation To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus Project traffic conditions, Project traffic was combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments that are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. The location of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study. According to the Project Traffic Study, cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. Other Approved or Proposed Development Project The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-D of the Traffic Study and include the following projects:  DRC 20118-000119 (9000 Hellman Ave.) – 174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse  DRC 2013-00565 (NE of Archibald/7th) – 171,941 General Industrial  DRC 2017-00654 (SW of Haven/26th) – 207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail  DRC 2016-00695 (8th/Industrial) – 150,003 sf General Industrial  DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/C-Store/Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions Other Approved Project Trip Generation The cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 5,485 trips per day with 489 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 518 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-E through 4-I contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 22, Opening day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Conditions, below. As shown on Table 22, the study area intersections are projected to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls, except for the intersection of Archibald Ave./Arrow Route (#1). However, the improvement of widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). Table 22 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 55.9 53.7 62.7 51.3 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 30.6 26.3 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 38.0 28.6 D C Page 309 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 78 Initial Study 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 13.7 13.4 B B 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route Future Intersection Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions The results of the Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 23, Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions, below. As shown on Table 23, most study area intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route (#1) will continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service with existing geometry. However, the same improvement measure under ODAC conditions (widening the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). Table 23 Opening Day (2019) Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 57.7 54.5 65.9 54.3 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 32.8 29.0 D D 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 41.3 38.8 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 14.6 15.1 B C 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 14.0 13.6 B B Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 24, Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions, below. As shown on Table 24, the following study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls:  Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1)  Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1), the separate westbound right turn with overlap phasing improvement identified under ODAC conditions is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). For the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), restricting the northbound approach to right turns only is anticipated to improve the intersection to operate at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better). However, this improvement will shift the northbound traffic heading west on Arrow to instead, turn right and make a U-turn at Ramona Avenue. The peak hour operations at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route have been evaluated for 2040 conditions and are presented in Table 24. It should be noted however that the intersection of Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours even without and with the shifted northbound left turn volumes from Page 310 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 79 Malven Avenue. As shown in Table 24, restricting northbound left turns at Malven Avenue/Arrow Route (#2) and northbound/southbound left turns at Ramona Avenue/Arrow Route (#3) during peak hours are anticipated improve both intersections to operate at an acceptable LOS. Table 24 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 70.3 54.2 56.8 53.6 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB left turn during peak hours CSS CSS 53.8 17.6 35.2 17.1 F C E C 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 46.6 45.5 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 15.2 13.9 C B 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route Future Intersection 6. Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB/SB left turns during peak hours CSS CSS >100 15.8 >100 16.1 F C F C Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 25, Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions, below. As shown on Table 25, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (#4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. As shown in Table 25, the improvements identified previously under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions are anticipated to improve the deficient intersections to operate at an acceptable level of (LOS “D” or better). Table 25 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Intersection Traffic Signal1 Delay (Seconds)2 Level of Service AM PM AM PM 1. Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route - With Improvements TS TS 72.5 54.4 58.9 54.8 E D E D 2. Malven Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB left during peak hours CSS CSS 60.4 18.1 40.4 17.7 F C E C 3. Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 46.7 45.8 D D 4. W. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route CSS 16.3 15.7 C C 5. E. Project Driveway/ Arrow Route - With Improvements CSS CSS 15.0 15.7 14.3 14.6 B C B B 6. Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route - Without NB/SB left turns during peak hours CSS CSS >100 16.1 >100 16.5 F C F C Source: Trames Solutions, Inc., 2018 1 TS=Traffic Signal; CSS=Cross Street Stop 2 Delay and Level of Service Calculated using the following software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD=Unacceptable Level of Service Page 311 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 80 Initial Study Findings For Existing (2018) conditions the study area intersections are operating at an acceptable level of service (LOS “D” or better) during the peak hours with existing geometry and traffic controls. For ODAC (2019) and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours. Providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2) are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS “E” or worse) during the peak hours. For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (#1), providing a separate westbound right turn with striping and overlap phasing is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For the intersection of Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (#2), restricting the northbound approach to right turns only during the peak hours is anticipated to improve the intersection to acceptable LOS. This improvement will in turn affect Ramona Avenue at Arrow Route, and in order to mitigate the secondary effects, the same treatment will be required to be installed during the peak hours at the intersection of Ramona Avenue and Arrow Route. Because LOS is no longer considered a significant impact pursuant to CEQA, the Project is not required to incorporate mitigation measures that would alleviate the above-described impacts. The Project traffic impact study provides the following recommendations, again provided for informational purposes only: Recommendations 1. On-Site. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below:  Provide stop sign control at the project driveways.  Provide signage to restrict access to right turns in/out only to/from the project driveways.  On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project.  Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. 2. Off-Site. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below:  Widen the de-facto westbound right turn lane at the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route with striping to provide an exclusive right turn lane with overlap phasing. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $40,000 based on the San Bernardino County CMP Preliminary Construction Cost Estimates for Congestion Management Plan. It should be noted that this intersection is currently operating at an acceptable level of service during the peak hours. However, this location is projected to operate deficiently under ODAC and 2040 without and with project conditions. The improvements will be conditioned to be constructed by the project. Furthermore, the development on the northeast corner (DRC 2015-00682 (8477 Archibald) – Gas Station/CStore/ Car Wash – 8 Fueling Positions) is anticipated to construct the northside of Arrow Route to its ultimate width.  Install signs to restrict northbound left turns left turns during peak hours at both Malven Avenue and Ramona Avenue along Arrow Route during peak hours (7:00 – 9:00 AM and 4:00 – 6:00 PM). This impact will only be present for 2040 conditions and the project should contribute to the improvement on a fair share basis. The estimated cost for this improvement is approximately $500 per location. The project fair share percentages are as follows: Page 312 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 81 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 49 84 Existing Traffic 2,148 2,309 2040 Traffic 2,654 2,787 New Traffic 506 478 Project Percentage 9.7% (49/506) 17.6% (84/478) Dollar Amount $88 Ramona Ave./ Arrow Route AM PM Project Traffic 54 79 Existing Traffic 2,171 2,280 2040 Traffic 2,621 2,770 New Traffic 450 490 Project Percentage 12.0% (54/450) 16.1% (79/490) Dollar Amount $81 Total for Project $169 b) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in significant impacts if it conflicts with the San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program (CMP) through reducing the Level of Service of a non-exempt segment to fall to “F”. If LOS for a non-exempt segment is reduced to “F”, a deficiency plan outlining specific mitigation measure and a schedule for mitigating the deficiency will be required. The nearest affected CMP designated arterials within the Project vicinity are Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. As shown above, the Project will not reduce the Level of Service for a non-exempt CMP segment to LOS “F”. While the Project will add new vehicle trips to the local roadway system, impacts to CMP designated roadways would be less than significant. Impacts to CMP designated freeways will be less than significant. c) No Impact. A significant impact would occur if the Project caused a change in air traffic patterns that would result in a substantial safety risk. The Project site is not located within an airport land use plan and does not include any structures that would change air traffic patterns or uses that would generate air traffic. Therefore, no impacts related to a change in air traffic patterns would occur. d) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the Project substantially increased an existing hazardous design feature or introduced incompatible uses to the existing traffic pattern. Access to the Project site is proposed via a 50-foot shared driveway on Arrow Route. The design of the Project would comply with all applicable City regulations. Furthermore, the Project does not involve changes in the alignment of Arrow Route, other than to widen the westbound right-turn lane, and the proposed car wash is consistent with existing commercial uses adjacent to the Project site on the west and south. The Project would not result in a traffic safety hazard due to any design features. No impact would occur. e) Less than Significant Impact. A significant impact would occur if the design of the Project would not satisfy emergency access requirements of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or in any other way threaten the ability of emergency vehicles to access and serve the Project site or adjacent uses. The Project would not result in inadequate emergency access. As discussed above, access to the Project site is proposed via a shared driveway on Arrow Route. The driveway width, 50 feet, is sufficient to provide access to fire and emergency vehicles and is consistent with the California Fire Code requiring a minimum of 20 feet. All access features are subject to and must satisfy the City of Rancho Cucamonga design requirements, including the Fire Department’s requirements. The Project would result in less than significant impacts with regard to emergency access. f) Less than Significant Impact. Public bus transit service in the Project vicinity is currently provided by the OmniTrans Route 66. Route 66 stops along a route to include the following stops: Montclair Plaza, Central & Foothill, Upland High School, San Antonio Hospital, Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center, Victoria Gardens, Juniper and Foothill, and Fontana Metrolink Transit Page 313 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 82 Initial Study Center.42 Pedestrian and bicycle facilities will also not be affected by the proposed Project. The Project would not conflict with or decrease the performance or safety of these services. Impacts would be less than significant. Cumulative Impacts The traffic study addresses both the Project-specific and the Project’s contribution to cumulative impacts. The Project would have a significant impact to the intersections of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route during Horizon Year (2040) conditions. However, this impact would occur without development of the Project and mitigation is not feasible given existing geometry and traffic conditions. Therefore, impacts from the Project are considered less than significant and no cumulatively considerable impact will occur. Page 314 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 83 4.17 – Tribal Cultural Resources Would the Project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a Cultural Native American tribe, and that is: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or □ □ □ b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. □ □ □ a -b) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. Assembly Bill (AB) 52 specifies that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change to a defined Tribal Cultural Resources (TCR) may result in a significant effect on the environment. AB 52 requires tribes interested in development Projects within a traditionally and culturally affiliated geographic area to notify a lead agency of such interest and to request notification of future Projects subject to CEQA prior to determining if a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project. The lead agency is then required to notify the tribe within 14 days of deeming a development application subject to CEQA complete to notify the requesting tribe as an invitation to consult on the Project. AB 52 identifies examples of mitigation measures that will avoid or minimize impacts to TCR. The bill makes the above provisions applicable to Projects that have a notice of preparation or a notice of intent to adopt a negative declaration/mitigated negative declaration circulated on or after July 1, 2015. AB 52 amends Sections 5097.94 and adds Sections 21073, 21074, 2108.3.1., 21080.3.2, 21082.3, 21083.09, 21084.2, and 21084.3 to the California Public Resources Code (PRC), relating to Native Americans. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). As part of the findings process, the City sent an email to the NAHC requesting a consultation list of tribes with traditional lands or cultural places located within San Bernardino County. A response from the NAHC was received on September 7, 2018. The following tribes were listed by the NAHC as having traditional lands or cultural places within the County: Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians, Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation, Gabrieleno/Tongva Nation, San Manuel Band of Mission Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and Serrano Nation of Mission Indians. Further, MIG sent a request to the NAHC on September 26, 2018 to search their SLF to ascertain whether their files contained any new information relating to the presence of Native American cultural resources within the Project area generally and on the Project site specifically. A response letter was received indicating the absence of documentation of tribal resources in the Project area or on the Project site. However, in accordance with Assembly Bill 52 (AB 52), which added various provisions to the California Public Resources Page 315 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 84 Initial Study Code (PRC) that concern Tribal Cultural Resources, including Section 21080.3.1(d), the City contacted local tribes requesting to be notified of Projects. Responses were received from three local tribes: the Morongo Band of Mission Indians (MBMI), The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI), and the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation (BBMIKN). The Morongo Band of Mission Indians had no information to provide and did not request formal consultation or mitigation. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians requested incorporation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4and SMBMI-5 to reduce impacts to archaeological resources. As such, Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4 and SMBMI-5 have been incorporated herein. The Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation requested inclusion of Mitigation Measures GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-3 to reduce impacts buried archaeological resources and Mitigation Measures GBMIKN- 4 through GBMIKN-8 to reduce impacts to buried human remains. These measures are incorporated into the Cultural Resources section of this document. In addition, Mitigation Measures TCR-1 through TCR-4 are incorporated herein to further address potential impacts related to TCR’s encountered during Project implementation. Mitigation Measure TCR-1 requires that a qualified tribal representative conduct tribal cultural resources sensitivity training for construction personnel. Mitigation Measure TCR-2 requires that a qualified Native American monitor be present during all construction excavations into non-fill sediments. If tribal cultural resources are encountered, Mitigation Measure TCR-3 requires that all ground-disturbing activities must be halted or diverted away from the find and that a buffer of at least 50 feet be established around the find until an appropriate treatment plan is coordinated. Mitigation Measure TCR-4 requires that the Native American monitor prepare a final report at the conclusion of monitoring activities. With implementation of Mitigation Measures SMBMI-1 through SMBMI-5, GBMIKN-1 through GBMIKN-8, and TCR- 1 through TCR-4, impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources will be less than significant. Mitigation Measures SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural Page 316 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 85 resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Cumulative Impacts With mitigation the Project would result in less than significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. The chances of cumulative impacts occurring as a result of Project implementation plus implementation of other projects in the region is not likely since projects would be subject to individual project-level environmental review. Since there would be no Project-related impacts and due to existing laws and regulations in place to protect tribal cultural resources and prevent significant impact to such resources, the potential incremental effects of the Project would not be cumulatively considerable. Page 317 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 86 Initial Study 4.18 – Utilities and Service Systems Would the Project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? □ □ □ b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? □ □ □ d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? □ □ □ e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the Project that it has adequate capacity to serve the Project’s Projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? □ □ □ f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the Project’s solid waste disposal needs? □ □ □ g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could affect Regional Water Quality Control Board treatment standards by increasing wastewater production such that expansion of existing facilities or construction of new facilities would be required. Exceeding the RWQCB treatment standards could result in contamination of surface or groundwater with pollutants such as pathogens and nitrates. New development in the City is required to install wastewater infrastructure concurrent with Project development. Wastewater conveyance is handled by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD). Wastewater is processed by CVWD and the Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). CVWD is one of eight member agencies that operate under the IEUA. IEUA operates 5 interconnected regional water-recycling facilities that treat approximately 60 million gallons per day (mgd) and have a combined permitted capacity of 84.4 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409). Two of the five IEUA Page 318 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 87 treatment plants serve development within the City of Rancho Cucamonga: Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4). At all IEUA treatment plants, wastewater is subject to tertiary-level water treatment, which produces effluent suitable for reuse (e.g. irrigation, wetlands/wildlife habitat, groundwater recharge). Per the General Plan Update Draft Program Environmental Impact Report (2010), the treatment plant RP-1 currently has an average excess capacity of approximately 9 mgd (IEUA NPDES No. CA8000409) and the portion of the City served by RP-1 (the western half and southern third) are the more developed areas of the City; therefore, additional development and redevelopment sufficient to exceed the remaining capacity of RP-1 is not anticipated. Wastewater generation more than RP- 1’s capacity, though considered unlikely, would be diverted to RP-4. RP-4 provides a current excess capacity of 7.9 mgd and a potential excess capacity of 21.9 mgd.43 All wastewater generated by the interior plumbing system of the car wash would be discharged into the local sewer main and conveyed for treatment at one of the above facilities. Wastewater flows associated with the car wash would consist of the same kinds of substances typically generated by commercial uses and no modifications to any existing wastewater treatment systems or construction of any new ones would be needed to treat this Project’s wastewater. Water use for the car wash was conservatively estimated at 30 gallons per vehicle based on estimates provided by the Applicant. The number of vehicles washed was estimated at 350 per day. With a resulting total of 127,750 vehicles washed annually, total water demand for the car wash is estimated at 3,832,500 gallons per year (10,500 gpd). Outdoor water use for landscaping is estimated at 420,480 gallons per year (1,152 gpd), for a total water use of 2,336,730 gallons per year (6,402 gpd). Wastewater is typically estimated to be 80 percent of total water use. Therefore, estimated wastewater generation from interior demand and outdoor irrigation demand for the proposed car wash development is 1,869,530 (5,122 gpd). This volume is within the remaining capacity of the CVWD’s 21.9 mgd total treatment capacity. This Project would thus have a less-than-significant impact on the ability of the CVWD to operate within its established wastewater treatment requirements, which are enforced via the facility’s NPDES permit authorized by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB). Therefore, the proposed Project would have a less than significant impact related to wastewater treatment requirements of the SARWQCB. b) Less than Significant Impact. The Cucamonga Valley Water District (CVWD) would supply water to the Project. CVWD’s drinking water comes from two primary sources: local groundwater and imported water. CVWD manages its supply and demand with careful analysis regarding customer need and population estimates to ensure there will be an adequate supply of clean, reliable water into the future. CVWD, like most other agencies, creates a Water Supply Master Plan every few years that helps guide our operations and water supply investments. CVWD has a diverse water supply portfolio that helps decrease its dependence on imported water. Finding new sources of water is critical to ensuring water supply reliability for CVWD’s customers. CVWD has been building a network of wells to take advantage of local groundwater supplies. The District's diversified supply ensures a reliable water supply during times of drought, regulatory constraints and other emergencies. CVWD maintains 34 reservoirs with a total capacity to store 95 million gallons of water in our service area. Water Code § 10910-10915 require the preparation of a water supply assessment (WSA) demonstrating sufficient water supplies for any subdivision that involves the construction of more than 500 dwelling units, or the equivalent thereof. As the Project is below the established thresholds, no WSA is required. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD, approximately 48 percent of CVWD’s overall supply comes from local groundwater wells in the Chino Groundwater Basin and the Cucamonga Basin. CVWD currently operates 20 groundwater wells throughout its service area. Three percent of the water delivered to CVWD consumers is local canyon and tunnel water that flows out of nearby canyons and foothills, often a combination of surface and groundwater. These sources include Cucamonga Canyon, Day Canyon, Deer Canyon, East Etiwanda Canyon, and a number of tunnels in the local mountains. This water is treated at CVWD’s Arthur H. Bridge or Lloyd W. Michael Treatment Plants, flows into storage reservoirs, and then into the distribution system to consumers. CVWD purchases 46 percent of its water through the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, who purchases water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), a regional water wholesaler that delivers imported water from the State Water Project. State Water Project water originates in Northern California in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, and makes a 400 mile journey to the CVWD service area. This water is treated at CVWD’s Lloyd W. Michael Water Treatment Plant, the largest conventional treatment plant in the region. The treated water is stored in reservoirs until it is needed by consumers. The water used within the CVWD service area as of 2015 was Page 319 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 88 Initial Study approximately 41,451 AFY and is expected to increase to 63,700 AFY (during a normal year) by the year 2035, an increase of 22,249 AFY.44 Based on the CalEEMod assumptions, the combined estimated water demand for the proposed Project is approximately 7.17 AFY, within the estimated increase in water demand. According to the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for CVWD, there is sufficient supply to accommodate demand under normal and single- and multiple-dry year conditions utilizing imported water.45 Local supplies would supplement imported supplies and provide additional supply reliability. Local supplies include groundwater pumped from the Cucamonga and Chino groundwater Basins, desalinated groundwater, and recycled water. The UWMP is based on area population Projections as provided by SCAG. As discussed in Section 4.13, the Project is consistent with SCAG Projections for the service area. As the estimated increase in water use is within the anticipated increase in the UWMP and the Project is consistent with regional population Projections, impacts would be less than significant. Regarding wastewater facilities, as discussed in the preceding response, wastewater generated at the Project site is treated at IEUA’s Regional Plant No. 1 (RP-1) and Regional Plant No. 4 (RP-4) facilities. The proposed Project is estimated to have a combined wastewater generation of approximately 5,122 gpd. This generation is well within the existing remaining treatment capacity of RP-1 and RP-4. Therefore, the expansion of the existing facility would not be required. Connections to local water and sewer mains would involve temporary and less than significant construction impacts that would occur in conjunction with other on-site improvements. The Project site is located within the existing service area of CVWD and is surrounded by existing development that is currently connected to existing CVWD water and wastewater lines. No additional improvements are needed to either water lines, sewer lines, or treatment facilities to serve the Project. Standard connection fees would address any incremental impacts of the Project. Therefore, the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts as a result of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities. c) Less than Significant Impact. Potentially significant impacts could occur as a result of this Project if storm water runoff was increased to a level that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities. As discussed in the Hydrology section, the Project would not generate any increased runoff from the site that would require construction of new storm drainage facilities. A NPDES permit would be required for the Project and, pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.190, all construction Projects shall prepare and submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Best Management Practices (BMPs) that include drainage controls such as detention ponds, dikes, filter berms, and down drains to prevent runoff, and utilizing plastic covering to prevent erosion shall also be applied pursuant to Municipal Code Section 19.20.110. Implementation of BMPs would reduce pollutants in stormwater and urban runoff from the Project site. The proposed storm drainage system and BMPs must be designed to the satisfaction of the City’s Public Works Director and in conformance with all applicable permits and regulations. The Project applicant/developer would be required to provide all necessary on-site infrastructure. Impacts would be less than significant, and no mitigation beyond compliance with existing regulations is required. The proposed Project would have a less than significant impact on requiring the construction of new facilities or expansion of existing storm drainage facilities. d) Less than Significant Impact. The Project could result in significant impacts if it required additional water supplies than are currently entitled. Water demand is provided by survey data utilized in the CalEEMod air quality model. Total water demand for the proposed Project is estimated at 2,336,610 gallons per year or 7.17 AFY. This number represents a conservative estimate because the proposed car wash would also utilize recycled water for car wash needs. Water demand within the EMWD service area is anticipated to increase by 22,249 AFY between 2015 and 2035. The Project’s conservative estimated water demand, 7.17 AFY, is well within anticipated increase in demand. Based on the CVWD 2015 UWMP, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project’s estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies, and therefore would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. As summarized above, the 2015 UWMP indicates that there is adequate supply to serve the projected demand. The Project would comply with all water conservation and efficiency standards required by the Rancho Cucamonga Public Works Page 320 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 89 Department. Therefore, there are sufficient water supplies to meet the Project’s estimated water demand and long-term demand. The proposed Project would not substantially deplete water supplies and would have a less than significant impact on entitled water supplies. e) Less than Significant Impact. As detailed in Sections 4.17.a and 4.17.b, the Project would be adequately served by existing facilities. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur. f) Less than Significant Impact. Significant impacts could occur if the Project would exceed the existing permitted landfill capacity or violates federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Solid Waste services are provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division (SWMD). Solid waste collection and transport in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is handled by contracted private firms that haul collected materials to regional landfills and materials recycling facilities. The County of San Bernardino contracted Burrtec to operate and maintain their solid waste disposal facilities located throughout the County. Solid waste generated in the City is transferred to Burrtec’s West Valley Materials Recovery Facility (MRF). Solid waste that is not diverted is primarily disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, a County Class III (i.e., municipal waste) landfill located at 2390 North Alder Avenue in Rialto (Ceballos 2009). According to the 2010 General Plan Update, Mid Valley Landfill has a daily permitted capacity of 7,500 tons per day (tons/day), a remaining capacity of 670,000 cubic yards (cy), and an anticipated close date of 2033. Landfill capacity is expected to decrease over time with future growth and development throughout San Bernardino County and surrounding Inland Empire areas. Waste reduction and recycling programs and regulations are expected to reduce this demand and extend the life of existing landfills. Construction and operation of the proposed Project would result in an estimated net increase in solid waste disposal of 27.85 tons per year. This increase is well within the remaining capacity of Mid-Valley Landfill’s daily permitted capacity. This nominal incremental increase in solid waste disposal, assuming that all solid waste in the City would be disposed at Mid-Valley Landfill, would not be considered cumulative considerable. Therefore, impacts related to the proposed Project would be less than significant and no mitigation is required. Compliance with County waste reduction programs and policies would reduce the volume of solid waste entering landfills. Individual development projects within the County would be required to comply with applicable state and local regulations, thus reducing the amount of landfill waste by at least 50 percent. The Project would increase the volume of solid waste generated in the County by 27.85 tons per year. According to CalRecycle, solid waste facilities serving San Bernardino County are projected to have a combined annual disposal limit of 3,633,512 tons and an annual remaining lifetime capacity surplus of 154,709,576 tons in the year 2025.46 Combined remaining capacities at the landfills would be adequate to accommodate the proposed Project. Impacts related to sufficient landfill capacity are anticipated to be less than significant. g) No Impact. The Project is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, County, and City statutes and regulations related to solid waste as a standard Project condition of approval. Therefore, no impact would occur. Cumulative Impacts The Project would have a less than significant impact with respect to utilities/service systems. The Project would require use of existing water and wastewater infrastructure, as well as existing, available solid waste disposal for building facility operation. Development of public utility infrastructure is part of an extensive planning process involving utility providers and jurisdictions with discretionary review authority. The coordination process associated with the preparation of development and infrastructure plans is intended to ensure that adequate resources are available to serve both individual projects and cumulative demand for resources and infrastructure as a result of cumulative growth and development in the area. Individual projects are subject to review for utility capacity to avoid unanticipated interruptions in service or inadequate supplies. Coordination with the utility companies would allow for the provision of utility service to the Project and other developments. The Project and other planned projects are subject to connection and service fees to assist in facility expansion and service improvements triggered by an increase in demand. Because of the utility planning and coordination activities described above, no significant cumulative utility impacts are anticipated. Page 321 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 90 Initial Study 4.19 – Mandatory Findings of Significance Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Does the Project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? □ □ □ b) Does the Project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? □ □ □ c) Does the Project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? □ □ □ a) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed Project would not substantially impact any scenic vistas, scenic resources, or the visual character of the area, as discussed in Section 4.1 and would not result in excessive light or glare. The Project site is located within a developed area with no natural habitat. The Project would not significantly impact any sensitive plants, plant communities, fish, wildlife or habitat for any sensitive species. There would be no impact to migratory birds. Adverse impacts to historic resources would not occur with mitigation incorporation. Construction-phase procedures would be implemented in the event any important cultural, archaeological, or paleontological resources are discovered during grading, consistent with Mitigation Measures CUL-1 through CUL-9. This site is not known to have any association with an important example of California’s history or prehistory. Based on the preceding analysis of potential impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17, no evidence is presented that this Project would degrade the quality of the environment. Impacts related to degradation of the environment, biological resources, and cultural resources would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. b) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The Project would result in significant impacts in the following areas: cultural resources, noise, and traffic. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for each of these environmental issue areas in order to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Standard conditions would also be imposed upon the Project. Other new development projects within the City would also be subject to these requirements. All other impacts of the Project were determined either to have no impact or to be less than significant, without the need for mitigation. Cumulatively, the Project would not result in any significant impacts that would substantially combine with impacts of other current or probable future impacts. Therefore, the Project, in conjunction with other future projects, would not result in any cumulatively considerable impacts. c) Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. Based on the analysis of the Project’s impacts in the responses to items 4.1 thru 4.17, there is no indication that the proposed Project could result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. While there would be a variety of temporary adverse effects during construction related to noise these would be reduced to less than significant levels through mitigation. Long-term effects include increased vehicular traffic, traffic-related noise, use Page 322 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 91 of household hazardous materials, emissions of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions, and increased demand on emergency response services. The analysis herein concludes that direct and indirect environmental effects would at worst require mitigation to reduce to less than significant levels. Environmental effects would result in less than significant impacts. Based on the analysis in this Initial Study, the City finds that direct and indirect impacts to human beings would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. Page 323 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 92 Initial Study This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 324 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 93 5 Mitigation Summary BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500-foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non-anthropogenic nest failure). CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. Page 325 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 94 Initial Study CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. Page 326 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 95 GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). Page 327 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 96 Initial Study GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians- Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. NOI-1 The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction:  Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: Page 328 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 97  Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise-generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays.  All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment.  The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction-related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction.  Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited.  Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance.  The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site.  If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks during grading and earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction Page 329 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 98 Initial Study excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Page 330 Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 99 6 References 6.1 – List of Preparers City of Rancho Cucamonga (Lead Agency) Planning Department 909-477-2750 Ext.4314 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730  Tabe Van der Zwaag, Associate Planner MIG (Environmental Analysis) 1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, California 92507 951-787-9222  Pamela Steele, Principal  Bob Prasse, Director of Environmental Services  Cameron Hile, Senior Analyst RGS ENGINEERING GEOLOGY (Phase I ESA) 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California 91784 951-315-3517  Christopher Krall, Engineering Geologist LDN CONSULTING, INC. (Noise) 42428 Chisolm Trail Murrieta, California 92562 760-473-1253  Jeremy Louden, Principal Trames Solutions, Inc. (Traffic and Transportation) 4225 Oceanside Blvd., #354H Oceanside, California 92056 760-291-1400  Scott Sato, P.E. 6.2 – Persons and Organizations Consulted None Page 331 References 100 Initial Study 6.3 – Bibliography 1 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Managing Land Use, Community Design, and Historic Resources. May, 2010. 2 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Los Angeles County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm [August 2018]. 3 California Department of Transportation. California Scenic Highway Mapping System: San Bernardino County. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/scenic_highways/index.htm [September 2018]. 4 California Department of Conservation. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program. https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/ [September 2018]. 5 California Department of Conservation. Williamson Act Program. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/SanBernardino_so_15_16_WA.pdf [September 2018]. 6 South Coast Air Quality Management District. CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 1993. 7 California Air Resources Board. South Coast Air Quality Management Plans. https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/scabsip/scabsip.htm. [February 2020]. 8 International Car Wash Association. Water Use, Evaporation and Carryout in Professional Car Washes. By Chris Brown Consulting. https://www.carwash.org/docs/default-source/2018-water-study/ica---water-quality.pdf?sfvrsn=c271db4b_2. [February 2020]. 9 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 10 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds. 11 San Bernardino Associated Governments. San Bernardino County Congestion Management Program. June 2016. 12 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. CNDDB Quick View Tool: Guasti 7.5-Minute Quadrangle. https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Maps-and-Data#43018410-cnddb-quickview-tool [September 2018]. 13 United States Fish and Wildlife Service. National Wetlands Inventory. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html [September 2019]. 14 California Department of Fish and Wildlife. NCCP Plan Summaries. https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=15329&inline [September 2018]. 15 California State Department of Conservation. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone Maps. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/ap/ap_maps.htm [September 2018]. 16 San Bernardino County: Land Use Services. Geologic Hazard Overlay maps. http://cms.sbcounty.gov/lus/Planning/ZoningOverlayMaps/GeologicHazardMaps.aspx [September 2018]. 17 United States Environmental Protection Agency. Frequently Asked Questions About Global Warming and Climate Change. Back to Basics. April 2009. 18 California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Emissions. August 2010 19 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 20 State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [September 2018]. 21 South Coast Air Quality Management District. Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities. Amended October 5, 2007 22 California Department of Toxic Substances. Draft Lead Report. June 2004. 23 California Environmental Protection Agency. Cortese List Data Resources. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ [September 2018]. 24 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. DTSC’s Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List – Site Cleanup (Cortese List). http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Cortese_List.cfm [September 2018]. 25 California State Water Resources Control Board. GeoTracker. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ [September 2018]. Page 332 References Arbor Express Car Wash (13603) 101 26 California State Water Resources Control Board. Sites Identified with Waste Constituents Above Hazardous Waste Levels Outside the Waste Management Unit. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/files/2016/10/SiteCleanup-CorteseList- CurrentList.pdf [September 2018]. 27 California State Water Resources Control Board. List of Active CDO and CAO. http://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/ [September 2018]. 28 California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Cortese List: Section 65962.5(a). https://www.calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/section-65962-5a/ [September 2018]. 29 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/ [September 2018] 30 California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones In LRA – South West San Bernardino County. November 2008. 31 Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Insurance Rate Map. Map Number 06071C8630J. February 18, 2015. 32 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Health and Safety Element. Figure PS-6. May 2010. 33 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2010 General Plan Update: Resource Conservation Element. Figure CR-2. May 2010. 34 Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Operational Noise Assessment. May 26, 2018. 35 Ldn Consulting, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Facility Construction Noise Assessment. January 7, 2019. 36 California Department of Transportation. Basics of Highway Noise: Technical Noise Supplement. September 2013. 37 California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. General Plan Guidelines. 2003. 38 California Department of Transportation. Transportation- and Construction-Induced Vibration Guidance Manual. September 2013. 39 Federal Aviation Administration. Airport Data and Contact Information. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/ [September 2018]. 40 The Brookings Institute. Handbook for Applying the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. 1999. 41 Trames Solutions, Inc. Arbor Car Wash Traffic Impact Analysis. September 24, 2018. 42 OmniTrans. Route 66: Fontana-Foothill-Montclair. http://www.omnitrans.org/schedules/route66/ [September 2018]. 43 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 44 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 45 Cucamonga Valley Water District. 2015 Urban Water Management Plan. June 2016. [September 2018]. 46 CalRecycle. Identify Disposal Facility Capacity Shortfalls. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/FacIT/facility/disposalgap.aspx [September 2018]. Page 333 Appendix A Air Quality/ GHG 0RGelinJ 'ata Page 334 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 335 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 1 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 336 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 2 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 337 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 3 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 338 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 6.4193 1.2974 7.3023 3.0347 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 6.4193 1.2974 7.3023 3.0347 1.2124 3.8471 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 2.9378 1.2974 3.8209 1.3786 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Maximum 17.0092 25.3989 16.0127 0.0327 2.9378 1.2974 3.8209 1.3786 1.2124 2.1911 0.0000 3,279.976 5 3,279.976 5 0.6608 0.0000 3,296.497 5 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 4 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 339 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 7 4,905.769 7 0.2509 1.4000e- 003 4,912.460 3 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Total 1.4386 5.7649 14.6137 0.0479 3.6694 0.0518 3.7212 0.9817 0.0489 1.0307 4,905.769 7 4,905.769 7 0.2509 1.4000e- 003 4,912.460 3 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 5 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 340 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 6 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 341 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 7 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 342 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 8 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 343 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0775 2.6797 0.5361 7.0700e- 003 0.1572 0.0100 0.1672 0.0431 9.5800e- 003 0.0527 765.8097 765.8097 0.0549 767.1828 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 003 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 9 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 344 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0775 2.6797 0.5361 7.0700e- 003 0.1572 0.0100 0.1672 0.0431 9.5800e- 003 0.0527 765.8097 765.8097 0.0549 767.1828 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.1406 2.7239 1.1184 8.6100e- 003 0.3025 0.0112 0.3137 0.0816 0.0106 0.0922 919.2567 919.2567 0.0597 920.7501 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 10 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 345 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 11 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 346 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 3.2175 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 12 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 347 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 13 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 348 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Total 0.0388 0.0272 0.3584 9.5000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 94.4289 94.4289 2.9600e- 003 94.5029 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 14 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 349 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0429 1.2627 0.3114 2.8300e- 003 0.0704 8.3700e- 003 0.0788 0.0203 8.0100e- 003 0.0283 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 302.4713 Worker 0.1262 0.0883 1.1646 3.0800e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- 003 307.1345 Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 003 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 0.1074 608.8574 608.8574 0.0299 609.6058 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 15 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 350 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0429 1.2627 0.3114 2.8300e- 003 0.0704 8.3700e- 003 0.0788 0.0203 8.0100e- 003 0.0283 301.9634 301.9634 0.0203 302.4713 Worker 0.1262 0.0883 1.1646 3.0800e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 306.8940 306.8940 9.6200e- 003 307.1345 Total 0.1691 1.3511 1.4760 5.9100e- 003 0.3610 0.0106 0.3717 0.0973 0.0101 0.1074 608.8574 608.8574 0.0299 609.6058 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 16 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 351 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 17 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 352 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Total 0.0631 0.0442 0.5823 1.5400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 153.4470 153.4470 4.8100e- 003 153.5672 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 18 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 353 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 19 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 354 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Total 0.0243 0.0170 0.2240 5.9000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 59.0181 59.0181 1.8500e- 003 59.0643 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 20 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 355 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 Unmitigated 1.2433 5.7012 14.5536 0.0475 3.6694 0.0470 3.7163 0.9817 0.0441 1.0258 4,829.392 2 4,829.392 2 0.2494 4,835.628 1 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 21 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 356 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 NaturalGas Unmitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 22 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 357 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 649.088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 0.649088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 23 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 358 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 24 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 359 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 25 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 360 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:06 PMPage 26 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Summer Page 361 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Winter CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 1 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 362 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 2 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 363 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 3 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 364 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 7.3023 3.0347 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 6.4193 1.2976 7.3023 3.0347 1.2126 3.8471 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2019 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 2.9378 1.2976 3.8209 1.3786 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Maximum 17.0115 25.4397 15.9988 0.0325 2.9378 1.2976 3.8209 1.3786 1.2126 2.1911 0.0000 3,257.585 5 3,257.585 5 0.6628 0.0000 3,274.154 4 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 54.23 0.00 47.68 54.57 0.00 43.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 4 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 365 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 3 4,654.254 3 0.2519 1.4000e- 003 4,660.968 7 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Energy 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mobile 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Total 1.3908 5.8731 13.9708 0.0454 3.6694 0.0522 3.7215 0.9817 0.0492 1.0310 4,654.254 3 4,654.254 3 0.2519 1.4000e- 003 4,660.968 7 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 5 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 366 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 6 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 367 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 7 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 368 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.8821 0.0000 1.8821 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.8821 1.2863 3.1684 0.2850 1.2017 1.4867 2,360.719 8 2,360.719 8 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 8 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 369 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0796 2.7162 0.5754 6.9500e- 003 0.1572 0.0102 0.1674 0.0431 9.7600e- 003 0.0528 752.9340 752.9340 0.0571 754.3624 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 003 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.8469 0.0000 0.8469 0.1282 0.0000 0.1282 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 1.2863 1.2863 1.2017 1.2017 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Total 2.2950 22.6751 14.8943 0.0241 0.8469 1.2863 2.1332 0.1282 1.2017 1.3300 0.0000 2,360.719 7 2,360.719 7 0.6011 2,375.747 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 9 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 370 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0796 2.7162 0.5754 6.9500e- 003 0.1572 0.0102 0.1674 0.0431 9.7600e- 003 0.0528 752.9340 752.9340 0.0571 754.3624 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.1489 2.7647 1.1044 8.4000e- 003 0.3025 0.0113 0.3139 0.0816 0.0108 0.0924 896.8657 896.8657 0.0617 898.4069 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.3298 0.0000 6.3298 3.0110 0.0000 3.0110 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 6.3298 0.8824 7.2122 3.0110 0.8118 3.8227 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 10 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 371 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.8484 0.0000 2.8484 1.3549 0.0000 1.3549 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 0.8824 0.8824 0.8118 0.8118 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Total 1.7123 19.4821 7.8893 0.0172 2.8484 0.8824 3.7308 1.3549 0.8118 2.1667 0.0000 1,704.918 9 1,704.918 9 0.5394 1,718.404 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 11 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 372 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 5.0468 0.0000 5.0468 2.5399 0.0000 2.5399 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 5.0468 0.7365 5.7833 2.5399 0.6775 3.2175 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 12 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 373 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.2711 0.0000 2.2711 1.1430 0.0000 1.1430 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 0.7365 0.7365 0.6775 0.6775 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Total 1.4197 16.0357 6.6065 0.0141 2.2711 0.7365 3.0075 1.1430 0.6775 1.8205 0.0000 1,396.390 9 1,396.390 9 0.4418 1,407.435 9 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 13 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 374 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Total 0.0427 0.0299 0.3256 8.9000e- 004 0.0894 7.0000e- 004 0.0901 0.0237 6.4000e- 004 0.0244 88.5734 88.5734 2.7800e- 003 88.6428 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 14 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 375 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0447 1.2643 0.3448 2.7500e- 003 0.0704 8.5000e- 003 0.0789 0.0203 8.1300e- 003 0.0284 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 Worker 0.1386 0.0971 1.0581 2.8900e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- 003 288.0891 Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 003 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 0.1076 581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Total 2.2721 15.9802 13.4870 0.0220 0.9158 0.9158 0.8846 0.8846 0.0000 2,018.022 4 2,018.022 4 0.3879 2,027.721 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 15 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 376 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0447 1.2643 0.3448 2.7500e- 003 0.0704 8.5000e- 003 0.0789 0.0203 8.1300e- 003 0.0284 293.8528 293.8528 0.0217 294.3961 Worker 0.1386 0.0971 1.0581 2.8900e- 003 0.2906 2.2700e- 003 0.2929 0.0771 2.1000e- 003 0.0792 287.8635 287.8635 9.0300e- 003 288.0891 Total 0.1834 1.3613 1.4030 5.6400e- 003 0.3610 0.0108 0.3718 0.0973 0.0102 0.1076 581.7163 581.7163 0.0308 582.4852 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 16 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 377 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9038 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Paving 0.4716 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.3754 9.1743 8.9025 0.0135 0.5225 0.5225 0.4815 0.4815 0.0000 1,325.095 3 1,325.095 3 0.4112 1,335.375 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 17 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 378 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Total 0.0693 0.0485 0.5291 1.4500e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.9318 143.9318 4.5100e- 003 144.0446 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 18 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 379 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 16.7184 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Total 16.9849 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 282.0423 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 19 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 380 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Total 0.0267 0.0187 0.2035 5.6000e- 004 0.0559 4.4000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 55.3584 55.3584 1.7400e- 003 55.4018 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 20 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 381 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 Unmitigated 1.1955 5.8094 13.9106 0.0450 3.6694 0.0473 3.7167 0.9817 0.0444 1.0261 4,577.876 9 4,577.876 9 0.2504 4,584.136 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 21 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 382 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 NaturalGas Unmitigated 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 22 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 383 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 649.088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Automobile Care Center 0.649088 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 7.0000e- 003 0.0636 0.0535 3.8000e- 004 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 4.8400e- 003 76.3633 76.3633 1.4600e- 003 1.4000e- 003 76.8171 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 23 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 384 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 24 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 385 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0229 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1648 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Total 0.1883 6.0000e- 005 6.6600e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0142 0.0142 4.0000e- 005 0.0151 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 25 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 386 11.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:09 PMPage 26 of 26 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Winter Page 387 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 39.25 1000sqft 0.90 39,254.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 18.27 1000sqft 0.42 18,267.00 0 Automobile Care Center 7.29 1000sqft 0.10 7,292.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2020Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Arbor Express Car Wash South Coast Air Basin, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 1 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 388 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Land Use Assumptions Based on Site Plan. Landscaping Total Includes Off Site Dedication. Construction Phase - Project Construction Approximately 6 Months Demolition - Existing Single-Family Home on Site Vehicle Trips - Trip Generation Rate per Project TIA and ITE Trip Generation Manual Energy Use - Water And Wastewater - Estimate of 15 gallons per car wash and 350 car washes per day for indoor water use. Default outdoor water use used. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Twice Daily Watering per SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 2 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 389 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 1.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 4.00 3.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 200.00 100.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 5.00 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 1.13 1.50 tblGrading AcresOfGrading 0.50 1.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 39,250.00 39,254.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 18,270.00 18,267.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 7,290.00 7,292.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.17 0.10 tblVehicleTrips PB_TP 28.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips PR_TP 21.00 49.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 23.72 97.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 11.88 97.37 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 23.72 97.37 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 685,851.27 1,916,250.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 3 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 390 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0302 0.0502 0.0804 0.0105 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 126.7630 126.7630 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0302 0.0502 0.0804 0.0105 0.0483 0.0588 0.0000 126.7630 126.7630 0.0211 0.0000 127.2909 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2019 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0238 0.0502 0.0740 7.4600e- 003 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 126.7629 126.7629 0.0211 0.0000 127.2908 Maximum 0.1725 0.9427 0.7963 1.4800e- 003 0.0238 0.0502 0.0740 7.4600e- 003 0.0483 0.0558 0.0000 126.7629 126.7629 0.0211 0.0000 127.2908 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.24 0.00 7.99 28.68 0.00 5.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 4 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 391 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Energy 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 36.2252 36.2252 1.2200e- 003 4.3000e- 004 36.3847 Mobile 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 0.0000 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6079 9.4381 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 003 0.6557 9.4400e- 003 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 003 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 818.4746 0.4392 1.9800e- 003 830.0464 Unmitigated Operational Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2019 3-31-2019 0.6357 0.6357 2 4-1-2019 6-30-2019 0.4763 0.4763 Highest 0.6357 0.6357 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 5 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 392 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Energy 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 36.2252 36.2252 1.2200e- 003 4.3000e- 004 36.3847 Mobile 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.6533 0.0000 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.6079 9.4381 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Total 0.2468 1.0886 2.5709 8.3800e- 003 0.6557 9.4400e- 003 0.6652 0.1757 8.9100e- 003 0.1846 6.2612 812.2133 818.4746 0.4392 1.9800e- 003 830.0464 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 6 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 393 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2019 1/1/2019 5 1 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 5 1 3 Grading Grading 1/3/2019 1/7/2019 5 3 4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/8/2019 5/27/2019 5 100 5 Paving Paving 5/28/2019 6/3/2019 5 5 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 6/4/2019 6/10/2019 5 5 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 10,938; Non-Residential Outdoor: 3,646; Striped Parking Area: 3,451 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 1 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 1.5 Acres of Paving: 1.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 7 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 394 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 1 7.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 6.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 6.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 6.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 1 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 6.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 8 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 395 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 9.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Total 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 1.5800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 0.00 9.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 3 8.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 26.00 11.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 5.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 9 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 396 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3456 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 Total 7.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4112 0.4112 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4119 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 4.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Total 1.1500e- 003 0.0113 7.4500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 6.4000e- 004 1.0600e- 003 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 004 6.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.0708 1.0708 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.0776 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 10 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 397 3.2 Demolition - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 4.0000e- 005 1.3800e- 003 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3449 0.3449 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3456 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0663 0.0663 0.0000 0.0000 0.0664 Total 7.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4112 0.4112 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4119 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.1600e- 003 0.0000 3.1600e- 003 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Total 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.1600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 3.6000e- 003 1.5100e- 003 4.1000e- 004 1.9200e- 003 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 11 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 398 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Total 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 1.4200e- 003 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Total 8.6000e- 004 9.7400e- 003 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.8600e- 003 6.8000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 1.0900e- 003 0.0000 0.7733 0.7733 2.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.7795 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 12 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 399 3.3 Site Preparation - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Total 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0408 0.0408 0.0000 0.0000 0.0408 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5700e- 003 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 0.0000 3.8100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.0200e- 003 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Total 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 7.5700e- 003 1.1000e- 003 8.6700e- 003 3.8100e- 003 1.0200e- 003 4.8300e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 13 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 400 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 3.4100e- 003 0.0000 3.4100e- 003 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 1.7100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.0200e- 003 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Total 2.1300e- 003 0.0241 9.9100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 1.1000e- 003 4.5100e- 003 1.7100e- 003 1.0200e- 003 2.7300e- 003 0.0000 1.9002 1.9002 6.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.9152 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 14 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 401 3.4 Grading - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1224 0.1224 0.0000 0.0000 0.1225 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 0.0000 91.9759 Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5360 91.5360 0.0176 0.0000 91.9759 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 15 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 402 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0644 0.0164 1.4000e- 004 3.4700e- 003 4.2000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.5661 Worker 6.2600e- 003 4.9900e- 003 0.0543 1.5000e- 004 0.0143 1.1000e- 004 0.0144 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 0.0000 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.2736 Total 8.4400e- 003 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 004 0.0177 5.3000e- 004 0.0183 4.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 26.8397 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5359 91.5359 0.0176 0.0000 91.9758 Total 0.1136 0.7990 0.6744 1.1000e- 003 0.0458 0.0458 0.0442 0.0442 0.0000 91.5359 91.5359 0.0176 0.0000 91.9758 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 16 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 403 3.5 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0644 0.0164 1.4000e- 004 3.4700e- 003 4.2000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 13.5423 13.5423 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.5661 Worker 6.2600e- 003 4.9900e- 003 0.0543 1.5000e- 004 0.0143 1.1000e- 004 0.0144 3.7900e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8900e- 003 0.0000 13.2632 13.2632 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 13.2736 Total 8.4400e- 003 0.0694 0.0707 2.9000e- 004 0.0177 5.3000e- 004 0.0183 4.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 26.8056 26.8056 1.3700e- 003 0.0000 26.8397 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.2600e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Paving 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4400e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 17 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 404 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 2.2600e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Paving 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 3.4400e- 003 0.0229 0.0223 3.0000e- 005 1.3100e- 003 1.3100e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 0.0000 3.0053 3.0053 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.0286 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 18 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 405 3.6 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.3316 0.3316 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3318 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e- 004 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 19 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 406 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0418 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 6.7000e- 004 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Total 0.0425 4.5900e- 003 4.6000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6397 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 20 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 407 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Total 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1275 0.1275 0.0000 0.0000 0.1276 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 21 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 408 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 Unmitigated 0.2112 1.0770 2.5603 8.3100e- 003 0.6557 8.5600e- 003 0.6643 0.1757 8.0300e- 003 0.1837 0.0000 766.5484 766.5484 0.0410 0.0000 767.5740 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Automobile Care Center 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 709.83 709.83 709.83 1,726,468 1,726,468 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Automobile Care Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 49 51 0 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 22 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 409 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.5824 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 23.5824 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Automobile Care Center 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.550339 0.043800 0.200255 0.122233 0.016799 0.005871 0.020633 0.029727 0.002027 0.001932 0.004726 0.000704 0.000955 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 23 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 410 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 236917 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 236917 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2800e- 003 0.0116 9.7600e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 12.6428 12.6428 2.4000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 12.7179 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 24 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 411 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 74013.8 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Automobile Care Center 74013.8 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 23.5824 9.7000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 23.6668 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 25 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 412 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Unmitigated 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 4.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Total 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 26 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 413 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 4.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0301 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Total 0.0343 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 1.6100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1.7200e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 27 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 414 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Unmitigated 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 1.91625 / 0.42036 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 28 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 415 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Automobile Care Center 1.91625 / 0.42036 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 10.0460 0.0628 1.5500e- 003 12.0802 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 29 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 416 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Unmitigated 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 27.85 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 30 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 417 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Automobile Care Center 27.85 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non- Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 5.6533 0.3341 0.0000 14.0058 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 31 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 418 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 8/29/2018 2:05 PMPage 32 of 32 Arbor Express Car Wash - South Coast Air Basin, Annual Page 419 Appendix B 3Kase , Cultural 5esRurFes Assessment 5PCFQSPWJEFE Page 420 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 421 HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION Arbor Express Car Wash Project City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County , California Prepared for: Ruth Villalobos, President Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. Ontario, California 91764 Prepared by: David Brunzell, M.A., RPA BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 Project No. RVA1802 Data Base Information: Type of Study: Intensive Survey Resources Recorded: Post War Residence at 9760 Arrow Route, Beverly Hills House at 9786 Arrow Route (Rancho Cucamonga Historic Landmark No. 32) USGS Quadrangle: 7.5-minute Guasti, California (1981) December 7, 2018 Page 422 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT ii MANAGEMENT SUMMARY BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, and privately owned residential properties to the east and west. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The records search revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (22 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. During the field survey, BCR Consulting personnel identified two historic-period residential buildings within the project site boundaries. The first historic-period residential building was located at 9760 Arrow Route. It is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). A s such it is not recommended a “historical resource” under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate Page 423 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT iii the physical impact on the environment caused by demolition or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Page 424 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT iii TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORIC SETTING .............................................................................................................. 1 PERSONNEL .......................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 RESEARCH ...................................................................................................................... 3 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................................ 3 RESULTS................................................................................................................................ 4 RESEARCH ...................................................................................................................... 4 FIELD SURVEY ................................................................................................................ 5 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS ............................................................................................ 6 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA ............................................................................................... 6 CALIFORNIA REGISTER EVALUATIONS ....................................................................... 6 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................... 7 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 9 FIGURES 1: Project Location Map ........................................................................................................ 2 TABLES A: Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site ............................... 4 APPENDICES A: DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS B: PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT C: NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE Page 425 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 1 INTRODUCTION BCR Consulting LLC (BCR Consulting) is under contract to Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. to complete a Cultural Resources Assessment of the proposed Arbor Express Car Wash Project (project) in the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City), San Bernardino County, California. A cultural resources records search, additional research, intensive-level pedestrian field survey, Sacred Lands File search with the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), and vertebrate paleontological resources assessment were conducted for the project in partial fulfillment of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project occupies approximately 2.59 acres and is bounded by Arrow Route to the south, an educational center to the north, a church and privately owned residential properties to the east, and Archibald Avenue to the west. The project site is located in Section 11 of Township 1 South, Range 7 West, San Bernardino Baseline and Meridian. It is depicted on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Guasti, California (1981) 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle (Figure 1). HISTORIC SETTING Please note that references for this section are provided in Appendix A. The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native Americ an group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. In 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain, the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide. Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth cent ury, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864. German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes were the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus, olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda, where they tested their ground-breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882, the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro-electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts (also speculative agricultural colonies) were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to form Iomosa. When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma. The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma’s infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and workers to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit Page 426 ProjectArea Created by Brent Rolf, Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Vicinity Map Project Location Site Arbor Express Car Wash Project Reference: ESRI; USGS Quad: Guasti, California (1981) Ruth Villalobos & Associates, Inc. Project Location Figure 1 0 10 20 Miles ´0 0.5 1 Miles 0 0.5 10.25 Kilometers Page 427 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 3 packinghouses, and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma’s local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum. After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California’s population expanded, but the process was gradual at first . Suburban expansion continued and the area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty-first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past. PERSONNEL David Brunzell, M.A., RPA acted as the Project Manager and Principal Investigator for the current study. Mr. Brunzell also compiled the Department of Park and Recreation (DPR) 523 forms and technical report. BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Joseph Orozco, M.A. ABD completed the record search through the South Central Coastal Information Center. BCR Consulting Staff Historian Dylan Williams, B.A. conducted the additional research, and BCR Consulting Staff Archaeologist Nicholas Shepetuk performed the field survey. METHODS Research Records Search. On November 29, 2018, a records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center at California State University, Fullerton. This archival research reviewed the status of all recorded historic and prehistoric cultural resources, and survey and excavation reports completed within one mile of the current project. Additional resources reviewed included the National Register of Historic Places (National Register), the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register), and documents and inventories published by the California Office of Historic Preservation. These include the lists of California Historical Landmarks, California Points of Historical Interest, Listing of National Register Properties, and the Inventory of Historic Structures. Additional Research. BCR Consulting performed additional research through records of the General Land Office Maintained by the Bureau of Land Management, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the San Bernardino County Assessor, San Bernardino County Historical Archives, and through various Internet resources. Field Survey An intensive-level field survey of the project site was conducted on November 19, 2018. Property access was limited so survey methods included making observations and taking detail and context photographs of the subject property and buildings. Based on these limitations, archaeological resources have not been assessed for the current project. The historic-period buildings were recorded on DPR 523 forms. Cultural resources were Page 428 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 4 recorded per the California OHP Instructions for Recording Historical Resources in the field using: • Detailed note taking for entry on DPR Forms (see Appendix A) • Digital photography of all cultural resources (see Appendix A). RESULTS Research Records Search. Data from the SCCIC revealed that 23 previous cultural resources studies have taken place, and 24 cultural resources (23 historic-period buildings, one historic road, and one historic district) have been recorded within one-mile of the project site. None of the previous studies has assessed the project site, and no cultural resources have been previously recorded within its boundaries. The records search is summarized as follows: Table A. Cultural Resources and Reports Within One Mile of the Project Site USGS 7.5 Min Quad Cultural Resources Within 1 Mile of Project Site Studies W/in 1 Mile Guasti, California (1981) P-36-2910: Historic-Period Nat. Trails Hwy. (3/4 Mile NW) P-36-10289H: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NE) P-36-12367: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile NE) P-36-16422: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile S) P-36-16423: Historic-Period Building (1/2 Mile SE) P-36-16425: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile SW) P-36-16435: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile NW) P-36-16436: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile SW) P-36-16438: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile E) P-36-16439: Historic-Period Market (1/2 Mile E) P-36-16440: Historic-Period Milliken Ranch (3/4 Mile E) P-36-16458: Historic-Period Residence (1/2 Mile NW) P-36-16459: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile N) P-36-16460: Historic-Period Structure (1/2 Mile N) P-36-16462: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NE) P-36-16480: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile NW) P-36-16481: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16482: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16483: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16484: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16485: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-16486: Historic-Period Residence (3/4 Mile N) P-36-21512: Historic-Period Residence (1/4 Mile NW) P-36-23221: Historic Cucamonga District (3/4 Mile NW) SB-106-0178, 0311, 0325, 0341, 0356, 0449, 1262, 1473, 2290, 3572, 3589, 4138, 4165, 4667, 5493, 6812, 6817, 6952, 7048, 7387, 7484, 7854, 7855 Additional Research. Additional research was performed for the project site to provide the background for the two properties developed during the historic era (i.e. greater than 45 years ago) within its boundaries (see also Field Survey Results, below). Review of the City’s Historic Landmarks Points of Interest indicated that the Beverly Hills House (at 9786 Arrow Route) has been designated as City Landmark #32 (see Appendix A). Page 429 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 5 9760 Arrow Route. The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954. Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joint ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today (see Appendix A for references). 9786 Arrow Route (Beverly Hills House). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (see Appendix A for references). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler’s reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (ibid.). Field Survey 9760 Arrow Route. This property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage un it and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false-paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). Since access was limited, descriptions are made using available photographs and observations from the edge of the property boundary. This property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It was built using Spanish Colonial style architecture popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta- colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence. Page 430 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 6 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATIONS During the field survey, four historic-period buildings on two separate properties were identified. CEQA calls for the evaluation and recordation of historic and archaeological resources. The criteria for determining the significance of impacts to cultural resources are based on Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and Guidelines for the Nomination of Properties to the California Register. Properties eligible for listing in the California Register and subject to review under CEQA are those meeting the criteria for listing in the California Register, or designation under a local ordinance. Significance Criteria California Register of Historical Resources. The California Register criteria are based on National Register criteria. City Landmark Designation criteria are similar to California Register criteria; the differences are bracketed [ ] below. For a property to be eligible for inclusion on the California Register or as a City Landmark, one or more of the following criteria must be met: 1. It is associated with the events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local [including City] or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the U.S.; 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local [the City’s], California, or U.S. history; 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, represents the work of a master, possesses high artistic values; and/or 4. It has yielded, or has the potential to yield, information important to the prehistory or history of the local area, California, or the nation. In addition to meeting one or more of the above criteria, the California Register requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource’s period of significance to “obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resourc es.” (CCR 4852 [d][2]). The California Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its significance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. California Register Evaluation 9760 Arrow Route. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is therefore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual or possess high artistic values. Page 431 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 7 Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic -age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under CEQA. Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California’s suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house’s integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. 9786 Arrow Route (The Beverly Hills House). A full California Register eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the limited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark (#32). RECOMMENDATIONS The historic-period house at 9760 Arrow Route is recommended not eligible for listing in the California Register. As such it is not recommended a “historical resource” under CEQA. It does not warrant further consideration. The residential building located at 9786 Arrow Route is known as the Beverly Hills House. Access issues to the Beverly Hills house and limited scope prevented a full evaluation of this property. However, it is listed as a Rancho Cucamonga City Landmark (#32) and for the current study is presumed eligible for listing in the California Register. Therefore the Beverly Hills House is presumed a historical resource (i.e. significant) under CEQA. CEQA guidelines state “a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource…may have a significant effect on the environment.” Furthermore, substantial adverse change is defined by the California Public Resource Code as “demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration such that the significance of a historical resource would be impaired” (PRC §5020.1[q]). Any project that proposes such impacts would result in a loss of integrity and as such would constitute a “substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource.” Preservation. Preservation in place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to historical resources under CEQA. Where preservation is not an option, mitigations may be developed in consultation with the City (or appropriate lead agency) in which potential adverse effects may be reduced. Potential options are summarized below. Data Collection. Prior to any proposed project-related impacts, the City would complete or require the completion of Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Report (HABS/HAER) style photographic documentation of the subject property. While the photographs would meet HABS/HAER standards, only local curation (and no federal curation or involvement) would be necessary. The photographic Page 432 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 8 documentation would be filed at the City and distributed to local libraries and historical societies as necessary for curation. However: In most cases the use of drawings, photographs, and/or displays does not mitigate the physical impact on the environment caused by demolitio n or destruction of an historical resource (14 CCR § 15126.4(b)). However, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation be undertaken even if it does not mitigate below a level of significance. In this context, recordation serves a legitimate archival purpose. The level of documentation required as a mitigation should be proportionate with the level of significance of the resource (California Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Through the implementation of this mitigation measure, impacts to the subject property would be reduced. However it may not be possible to reduce those impacts below a level of significance. Resource Relocation. Relocation can mitigate the impacts of demolition if a compatible new site is available. However: Relocation of an historical resource may constitute an adverse impact to the resource. However, in situations where relocation is the only feasible alternative to demolition, relocation may mitigate below a level of significance provided that the new location is compatible with the original character and use of the historical resource and the resource retains its eligibility for listing on the California Register (14 CCR § 4852(d)(1)) Office of Historic Preservation 2001:6). Implementation of this mitigation measure would potentially mitigate impacts to the resource below the level of significance. However, relocation would itself constitute a significant adverse change to the resource unless an appropriate compatible location could be identified. Please note that limited property access prevented a systematic survey for prehistoric and historic-period archaeological resources. As a result, findings and recommendations for archaeological resources are not part of the current study. If human remains are encountered during the project, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Se ction 5097.98. The County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. If the remains are determined to be prehistoric, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which will determine and notify a Most Likely Descendant (M LD). With the permission of the landowner or his/her authorized representative, the MLD may inspect the site of the discovery. The MLD shall complete the inspection within 48 hours of notification by the NAHC. Page 433 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT 9 REFERENCES California Office of Historic Preservation 2001 2001 Technical Assistance Series #1. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Historical Resources. Electronic Document: http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/pages/ 1054/files/ts01ca.pdf. Accessed 12/7/2018. United States Geological Survey 1981 Guasti, California 7.5-minute topographic quadrangle map. PLEASE SEE APPENDIX A FOR ADDITIONAL REFERENCES. Page 434 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX A DEPARTMENT OF PARK AND RECREATION 523 FORMS Page 435 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 3 *Resource Name or #: 9760 Arrow Route P1. Other Identifier: N/A *P2. Location: ☐ Not for Publication ; Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9760 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155’ AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *P3a. Description: The subject property is occupied by single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a 1,204 square-foot, single-story wood-frame home with one bedroom and two bathrooms, and a two-car attached garage. The property is accessed by a cement-paved driveway that leads from the street to the garage unit and front of the home. Composition roofing tops the house and the central portion of the main (south) elevation contains a large, painted brick chimney. Most of the windows contain the original wooden frames, although a large front window has been replaced with a modern false- paned vinyl window. The residence features central heating and an evaporative cooling system. The rest of the subject property to the north is vacant. *P3b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential *P4. Resources Present: ; Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐Element of District ☐Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Photo 1: View N. *P6. Date Constructed/ Age and Sources: ;Historic constructed 1954 (San Bernardino Assessor) ☐ Prehistoric ☐ Both *P7. Owner and Address: Matthews Living Trust Fund 9760 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA *P8. Recorded by: D,. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date: 11-19-18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Historical Resources Evaluation of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ☐NONE ☐ Location Map ☐ Sketch Map ; Continuation Sheet ;Building, Structure, and Object Record ☐Archaeological Record ☐District Record ☐Linear Feature Record ☐Milling Station Record ☐Rock Art Record ☐Artifact Record ☐Photograph Record ☐Other (List): P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) Page 436 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 3 *NRHP Status Code: 6Z *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 9760 Arrow Route B1. Historic Name: N/A B2. Common Name: N/A B3. Original Use: Single-Family Residence B4. Present Use: Single-Family Residence *B5. Architectural Style: Ranch/Postwar Minimal *B6. Construction History: The area surrounding the subject property was dominated by citrus groves until 1948, after which residential developments begin to appear. The house at 9760 Arrow Route was built in 1954 (San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Building permits did not indicate any major alterations or upgrades. *B7. Moved? ;No †Yes †Unknown Date: N/A Original Location: N/A *B8. Related Features: None B9a. Architect: b. Builder: Unknown *B10. Significance: Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: Mid-20th Century, 1954 Property Type: Single Family Property Applicable Criteria: N/A Theme: Suburban Development Area: Rancho Cucamonga Period of Significance: 1950s Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: N/A B11. Additional Resource Attributes: N/A (Discuss importance in terms of historical/architectural context by theme, period, and geographic scope. Address Integrity.) The house exhibits an L-shaped plan and horizontal orientation typical of Ranch tract design, although its compact design is more common in Postwar Minimal buildings. In 1953 Eunice P. and Carl Swanson bought the property and constructed the house in 1954. It was transferred to the Eunice P. Swanson Family Trust in 1973. In 1988 ownership was transferred to the Matthews Living Trust. It was classified under the joi nt ownership of Cloetis and Judith K. Matthews, who each claimed a fifty percent ownership interest. The Matthews remain the owners of the property today (San Bernardino County Assessor Records 2018). Rancho Cucamonga History The modern City of Rancho Cucamonga was formed in 1977 when the communities of Alta Loma, Cucamonga, and Etiwanda incorporated. Cucamonga took its name from a Gabrielino Native American group that inhabited the area before the arrival of Spanish missionaries in the late eighteenth century. I n 1839, after Mexico gained independence from Spain, the Mexican government granted the 13,000-acre Rancho de Cucamonga to Tiburcio Tapia. Americans began settling in California in large numbers during the Gold Rush in the 1840s, and California statehood in 1850 accelerated the process statewide. Although much of San Bernardino County remained sparsely populated through the end of the nineteenth century, a stage coach line came to Cucamonga in 1858, followed by a post office in 1864 (City of Rancho Cucamonga). German immigrant and financier Isaias Hellman purchased the Rancho in 1870, and formed a company to promote the area as an agricultural colony. Irrigation and the Union Pacific Railroad came to the area in 1887, and settlers began farming. Grapes w ere the most important agricultural product during this era, but citrus, olives and other crops were also cultivated. In 1881, George and William Chaffey purchased the land to form Etiwanda, where they tested their ground -breaking irrigation and town planning ideas. At the dawn of the age of electricity in 1882, the Chaffeys powered Etiwanda with a hydro -electric plant. The brothers later went on to found Ontario and other communities and became renowned for their innovations. In 1881 and 1882 the Hermosa and Iowa tracts (also speculative agricultural colonies) were laid out nearby, and their names were soon combined to form Iomosa. When a new railroad came to the area to serve the foothill citrus groves in 1913, Iomosa was renamed Alta Loma (Emick 2011). (Continued on Continuation Sheet, page 3.) *B12. References: Emick, Paula, 2011 Images of America: Rancho Cucamonga. Arcadia Publishing, Charleston. City of Rancho Cucamonga, “Historic Landmarks, Points of Interest: Our Heritage,” Rancho Cucamonga. San Bernardino County, “San Bernardino County File Lot Book 047: ‘Cucamonga: Section 11 T1S R7W’”. San Bernardino Historic Archives, San Bernardino. San Bernardino County, San Bernardino County Property Information Management System. Online assessor database. http://www.sbcounty.gov/assessor/pims/ accessed 11/14/18. *B14. Evaluators: David Brunzell, BCR Consulting, Claremont, California *Date of Evaluation: 12/7/18 (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) Page 437 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# CONTINUATION SHEET Page 3 of 3 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) 9760 Arrow Route Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams *Date: ; Continuation † Update *B10 (continued from page 2). The new railroad station was an important addition to Alta Loma’s infrastructure, allowing citrus growers to ship their produ ce to Los Angeles and beyond. It also allowed students and worke rs to commute to nearby towns. The area remained largely rural and the economy was supported by agriculture until the middle of the twentieth century. Alta Loma had several fruit packinghouses , and fruit drying racks were spread across every available field during harvest season. Most families were involved in farming or processing agricultural products, and Alta Loma’s local grammar school incorporated gardening into its curriculum. After the end of World War II, houses gradually began to replace orchards as Southern California’s population expanded, but the process was gradual at first (Emick 2011). The area began to experience uncontrolled development in the 1970s, as residents of Orange and Los Angeles counties moved east in search of reasonably-priced housing. Residents formed a committee to discuss incorporation in order to control growth in 1975, and formed Rancho Cucamonga from the three unincorporated communities in 1977. By the turn of the twenty -first century Rancho Cucamonga was a bedroom community with only vestiges of its agricultural past (City of Rancho Cucamonga). Evaluation California Register of Historical Resources requires that a significance criterion (1 -4) be met for a resource to be eligible. A resource is eligible if (1) it is assoc iated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage; (2) it is associated with the lives of persons important in California's past; (3) it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic value; or (4) it has yielded or is likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The California Register also requires that sufficient time has passed since a resource’s period of significance (normally 45 years) to “obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resources” (CCR 4852 [d][2]). The Califor nia Register also requires that a resource possess integrity. This is defined as the ability for the resource to convey its signi ficance through seven aspects: location, setting, design, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association. Criterion 1: The property at 9760 Arrow Route was fits within a context of postwar suburban development of Rancho Cucamonga, however it is not associated with important events related to the founding and/or development of the industry. It is there fore not eligible for the California Register under Criterion 1. Criterion 2: Substantial research has not linked the subject property with individuals who have been notable in local, state, or national history. Criterion 3: The house is a simple example of a Ranch/Postwar Minimal house from 1954, and it appears to be a common design. Therefore the property does not embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creat ive individual or possess high artistic values. Criterion 4: Extensive research has exhausted this resources data potential, and as such the resource has not and is not likely to yield information important in prehistory or history. The subject property and its constituent historic-age building is therefore recommended not eligible under any of the four criteria for listing on the California Register, and as such is not recommended a historical resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Thus BCR Consulting recommends the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) Status Code “6Z”. Integrity. The subject property was developed during the mid-20th century, and is associated with southern California’s suburban development during that era. The building remains in its original location, so the property maintains its integrity of location. This combines with the mature trees, foliage, and the neighborhood to convey a measure of integrity of feeling and association. Changes to the windows and other alterations have impacted the house’s integrity of design, materials, and workmanship. Page 438 State of California ⎯ The Resources Agency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # PRIMARY RECORD Trinomial NRHP Status Code 6Z Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 2 *Resource Name or #: The Beverly Hills House P1. Other Identifier: Beverly Hills House *P2. Location: ☐ Not for Publication ; Unrestricted *a. County: San Bernardino and (P2b and P2c or P2d. Attach a Location Map as necessary.) *b. USGS 7.5' Quad: Guasti, CA Date: 1981 T1S; R7W; Section 11; SBBM c. Address: 9786 Arrow Route City: Rancho Cucamonga Zip: 91730 d. UTM: Zone: N/A mE/ Elevation: 1155’ AMSL e. Other Locational Data: The subject property is located on the north side of Arrow Route, east of Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. *P3a. Description: The subject property is occupied by a single-family residence that is historic in age (i.e. over 45 years old). The residence is a two-bedroom, one-bathroom wood-framed 1,625 square-foot, single-story home. It is a classic representation of Spanish Colonial style architecture that was popular across Southern California during the early twentieth century. The arcaded front windows are framed by green painted tiles, and the white stucco exterior and terracotta-colored roofing all invoke the Spanish Colonial trend. The main residence is located on rear of the property. The home features interior domed ceilings in many of the common areas, custom coving, a heating unit attached to an interior wall, one fireplace, and a large covered patio that houses a small koi pond and waterfall. Two detached structures include a two-car, 440 square-foot garage and a small cottage located behind the main residence (San Bernardino Property Assessor 2018). The City of Rancho Cucamonga designated the property as a Historic Landmark in 1989 and it remains listed. The main residential building was constructed between 1928 and 1932 and was subsequently relocated from Beverly Hills to its present-day location in Rancho Cucamonga (City of Rancho Cucamonga ND). Dates of the relocation have been reported between 1942 and 1958 and could not be verified with primary documents (ibid.). The relocation had reportedly been arranged by Len Smutzler of Upland, but further research has not been able to verify this. After Smutzler’s reported ownership, the property was acquired by Frank and Eleanor Paul in 1953 (San Bernardino County Records 1949-1951). A full California Register of Historical Resources eligibility evaluation is not currently possible based on the l imited available information and scope, however the Beverly Hills House is presumed eligible (i.e significant under CEQA) since it is a designated City Landmark (#32). References: San Bernardino County Assessor 2018. Records on File at the San Bernardino County Assessor. Accessed 11 /20/2018. City of Rancho Cucamonga ND. Historic Landmarks Pointes of Interest. Electronic Document: https://www.cityofrc.us/civicax/ filebank/blobdload.aspx?blobid=10247. Accessed 11/20/2018. *P3b. Resource Attributes: Single-Family Residential *P4. Resources Present: ; Building ☐Structure ☐Object ☐Site ☐District ☐Element of District ☐Other P5b. Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) Photo 1: Overview from Zillow.com. *P6. Date Constructed/ Age and Sources: ;Historic constructed in 1932 (San Bernardino Property Assessor [PIMS]) ☐Prehistoric ☐Both *P7. Owner and Address: Janice Y. Gruber 9786 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 *P8. Recorded by: D. Brunzell, N. Shepetuk, D. Williams BCR Consulting LLC Claremont, California 91711 *P9. Date Recorded: 11/18/18 *P10. Survey Type: Intensive. *P11. Report Citation: Cultural Resources Assessment of the Arbor Express Car Wash Project, Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California *Attachments: ☐NONE ; Location Map ☐ Sketch Map ☐ Continuation Sheet ☐ Building, Structure, and Object Record ☐Archaeological Record ☐District Record ☐Linear Feature Record ☐Milling Station Record ☐Rock Art Record ☐Artifact Record ☐Photograph Record ☐Other (List): P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo required for buildings, structures, and objects.) Page 439 Page 440 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX B PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 DECEMBER 7, 2018 BCR CONSULTING HISTORICAL RESOURCES EVALUATION ARBOR EXPRESS CAR WASH PROJECT APPENDIX C NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION CORRESPONDENCE Page 444 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Governor NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION Cultural and Environmental Department 1550 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95691 Phone: (916) 373-3710 Email: nahc@nahc.ca.gov Website: http://www.nahc.ca.gov Twitter: @CA_NAHC December 4, 2018 Nicholas Shepetuk BCR Consulting LLC VIA Email to: nickshepetuk@gmail.com RE: Arbor Express Car Wash Project, San Bernardino County. Dear Mr. Shepetuk: A record search of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) was completed for the information you have submitted for the above referenced project. The results were negative. However, the absence of specific site information in the SLF does not indicate the absence of cultural resources in any project area. Other sources of cultural resources should also be contacted for information regarding known and recorded sites. Attached is a list of Native American tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the project area. This list should provide a starting place in locating areas of potential adverse impact within the proposed project area. I suggest you contact all of those indicated; if they cannot supply information, they might recommend others with specific knowledge. By contacting all those listed, your organization will be better able to respond to claims of failure to consult with the appropriate tribe. If a response has not been received within two weeks of notification, the Commission requests that you follow-up with a telephone call or email to ensure that the project information has been received. If you receive notification of change of addresses and phone numbers from tribes, please notify me. With your assistance we are able to assure that our lists contain current information. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: katy.sanchez@nahc.ca.gov. Sincerely, KATY SANCHEZ Associate Environmental Planner Attachment Page 445 Native American Heritage Commission Native American Contacts List 12/4//2018 Andrew Salas, Chairperson P.O. Box 393 Covina 91723 (626) 926-4131 Gabrielino CA, admin@gabrielenoindians.org Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh Nation Anthony Morales, Chairperson P.O. Box 693 San Gabriel 91778 (626) 483-3564 Cell Gabrielino Tongva CA, GTTribalcouncil@aol.com (626) 286-1262 Fax Gabrieleno/Tongva San Gabriel Band of Mission Indians Sandonne Goad, Chairperson 106 1/2 Judge John Aiso St., #231 Los Angeles 90012 (951) 807-0479 Gabrielino Tongva CA, sgoad@gabrielino-tongva.com Gabrielino /Tongva Nation This list is current as of the date of this document and is based on the information available to the Commission on the date it was produced. Distribution of this list does not relieve any person of statutory responsibility as defined in Section 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code,Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code, or Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This list is only applicable for contacting local Native American Tribes for the proposed: Arbor Express Car Wash Project, San Bernardino County. Page 446 Appendix C 3Kase , (nYirRnmental Site Assessment Page 447 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 448 RGS Engineering Geology 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California www.rgsgeosciences.com (951) 315-3517   Geologic Evaluation Fault/Seismic Studies Environmental Assessments Percolation Testing   June 14, 2018 Alan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 SUBJECT: PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744, 9760, & 9786 Arrow Route (APN 0208-291-06, 03, & 02) Rancho Cucamonga, California Mr. Smith: Enclosed, please find our Phase I Environmental Assessment report for the subject property. Our services are generally guided by the provisions of the ASTM E 1527 and EPA AAI (CFR 40 312) standards. The objective of this study is to evaluate the environmental condition of the subject property and determine the likelihood of hazardous materials impact. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations relating to the environmental condition of the property are presented herein. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call our office. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Respectfully submitted, RGS Engineering Geology _____________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Engineering Geologist Distribution: [1] Addressee (electronic) Page 449 1.0 SUMMARY _____________________________________________________________ 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ________________________________________________________ 1 2.1 Purpose __________________________________________________________________ 1 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services ________________________________________________ 1 2.3 Significant Assumptions __________________________________________________ 2 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions ________________________________________________ 2 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions _____________________________________________ 2 2.6 User Reliance _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION _____________________________________________________ 2 3.1 Location and Legal Description ____________________________________________ 2 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics ___________________________________ 3 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water) _________________ 4 3.5 Current Uses if the Adjoining Properties ____________________________________ 4 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION ________________________________________ 4 4.1 Title Records _____________________________________________________________ 4 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations ________________________ 4 4.3 Specialized Knowledge ____________________________________________________ 4 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information _________________ 4 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ______________________________ 5 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I _____________________________________________ 5 4.8 Other ____________________________________________________________________ 5 5.0 RECORD REVIEW ______________________________________________________ 5 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources ___________________________________ 5 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources __________________________________ 6 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) _________________________________________________ 6 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property __________________________________ 7 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties __________________________ 7 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ________________________________________________ 7 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions ______________________________________ 7 6.2 General Site Setting _______________________________________________________ 8 6.3 Exterior Observations _____________________________________________________ 9 Page 450 6.4 Interior Observations ______________________________________________________ 9 7.0 INTERVIEWS ___________________________________________________________ 9 7.1 Interview with Owner ______________________________________________________ 9 7.2 Interview with Site Manager _______________________________________________ 10 7.3 Interview with Occupants _________________________________________________ 10 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials _________________________________ 10 7.5 Interview with Others _____________________________________________________ 10 8.0 FINDINGS ______________________________________________________________ 11 9.0 OPINION ______________________________________________________________ 11 10.0 CONCLUSIONS _______________________________________________________ 11 11.0 DEVIATIONS __________________________________________________________ 12 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES _______________________________________________ 12 13.0 REREFENCES ________________________________________________________ 12 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) _______________ 12 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) ___________ 13 Page 451 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Site Plan 1.0 SUMMARY In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject sites is considered low. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable conditions of the sites are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. 2.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the findings of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment conducted in accordance with our proposal and your written authorization. This report has been prepared in general conformance with applicable guidelines provided by various professional societies and institutions. Our field reconnaissance of the site was performed on Thursday June 13, 2018. The field reconnaissance involved traversing the property in order to observe surface soil conditions, structures, possible generators or storage of hazardous materials, drainage courses, land use, vegetation, and any notable surface conditions which would indicate the presence of hazardous waste or petroleum product contamination on or near the site. 2.1 Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to identify, to the extent feasible and pursuant to the processes presented herein, the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products on the property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the properties or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water in connection with the properties. 2.2 Detailed Scope-of Services The scope of work completed for this investigation included a field reconnaissance of the site and surrounding areas, historical record and document review, historic aerial photo review, and submittal of this report. Page 452 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 2.3 Significant Assumptions This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by environmental professionals practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice included in this report. In addition, changes in the conditions of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether they are due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Changes in applicable or appropriate standards may occur, whether they result from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside our control. No soil/water sampling or testing was provided for this assessment. 2.4 Limitations and Exceptions In preparing this report, we were provided information derived from secondary sources. We have made no independent investigation as to the accuracy or completeness of the information derived from these sources. We have assumed the information provided to us by our sources was accurate and complete. 2.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special terms or conditions were brought to our attention or discovered through the course of our investigation relating to the environmental condition of the property. 2.6 User Reliance The findings and analyses set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluation(s) and is the property and for the sole use of our Client. However; RGS may, upon written authorization and instruction from the Client, provide copies of this report, and then only in total, to whom ever instructed. Additionally, Client, without any permission from RGS may assign this report to person(s) or entity(s) of their choice and all of the same entitlements, restrictions, and limitations apply to the new entity(s) as if they were the original requestor of services. 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location and Legal Description The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route, just east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The site includes three contiguous properties with the following addresses and APN numbers: Page 453 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 9744 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-06-0000 9760 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-03-0000 9786 Arrow Route - APN 0208-291-02-0000 The geographical relationships of the site and surrounding vicinity are depicted on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. 3.2 Site and Vicinity General Characteristics The property located at 9744 Arrow Route is currently open and vacant. There are remnants of a previous single-family home on-site. The properties of 9760 and 9786 Arrow Route currently support occupied single-family home developments with appurtenant landscaping and yard improvements. Vegetation consists of a few mature landscape trees and landscape bushes and grass locally. Seasonal weeds and grasses occupy the open areas of the site. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient sloping to the south at less than two percent. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route which exists as an improved road with concrete curb, gutter, and pavement. 3.3 Current Use of the property Selected site photographs showing the physical condition of the property and man- made improvements are provided in Appendix B of this report for your review. The following is a brief description of the on-site features. Man-made features on the site include two single family residences with associated improvements such as driveways and landscaping. Overhead electrical lines serve the property and we assume underground utilities include sewer, water and gas. Other utilities may also be present. A pole mounted transformer was noted along the southern property line at 9760 Arrow Route. The transformer does not appear to be in a compromised condition, showing no visible leaks or damages. Asbestos The structures present on-site were likely constructed prior to the 1980’s and could contain asbestos containing materials (ACM). Prior to the deconstruction or remodeling, an asbestos and lead paint survey should be conducted by a professionally licensed consultant to determine the potential impacts from these substances, if any. Page 454 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 3.4 Descriptions of Structures, Roads, Other Improvements on the site (including heating/cooling system, sewage disposal, source of potable water) No structures are present at 9744 Arrow Route. A residential structure is present at 9760 Arrow Route, and 9786 Arrow Route. Out buildings/sheds are also noted at 9786 Arrow Route. The residential structures and out buildings were not surveyed as part of this assessment and are reportedly limited to typical residential use and storage. No interior inspection was conducted or considered necessary as the homes are reportedly leased and used only for residential purpose. The homes are accessed along driveways extending from Arrow Route. On-site sewage disposal was likely used in the past. Septic tanks may be present on the properties. 3.5 Current Uses of the Adjoining Properties Based on our historical research, data review, and aerial photograph examination, the property is bordered to the north by a school, to the east by a residence, to the west by an abandoned gas station, and to the south by Arrow Route (4 lanes) and a retail shopping center. 4.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4.1 Title Records No title records were provided for our review. 4.2 Environmental Liens of Activity and Use Limitations No environmental liens or use limitation were provided by the client or known to exist in association with the property. 4.3 Specialized Knowledge We have not been provided with any specialized knowledge concerning the past land use or environmental condition of the property. 4.4 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Information has been obtained for the purpose of this Phase I environmental assessment from EDR resource group and together with our field inspection and document review represents commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information. Page 455 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 4.5 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No reduction in the value of the property related to environmental impacts, issues, or concerns has been reported. 4.6 Owner, Property Manager, and Occupant Information The property is currently owned by: - 9744 Arrow Route - Dejager Family Trust - 9760 Arrow Route - Mathews, Cleotis and Jancy - 9786 Arrow Route - Graber, Janice 4.7 Reason for Performing Phase I It is our understanding that the client intends to develop the site as a carwash. This phase I assessment was performed as part of the due diligence associated with the development. 4.8 Other No other information of significance was provided by our client for the purpose of our assessment. 5.0 RECORD REVIEW Records were obtained and reviewed that would help identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Reasonably ascertainable information, which was publicly available, obtainable from its source within reasonable time and cost constraints, and that was practically reviewable, was utilized. 5.1 Standard Environmental Record Sources For this ESA, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) provided a complete search of standard environmental records in accordance with the requirements of ASTM E 1527-05, Section 8.2.1. A complete list of the records searched and a copy of The EDR report is presented in Appendix 16.6. Information obtained by the review of standard records indicated the following: • No facilities are noted in a condition, location, or elevation that could impact the subject property. Page 456 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 6 5.2 Additional Environmental Record Sources Additionally, EDR and the client/user provided records for our review from the following local agencies. • San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services, Waste Management Department • San Bernardino County Land Use Services Department • California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region • California Department of Toxic Substance Control • California Department of Conservation, Office of Mine Reclamation • Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 Copies of the records requests and agency responses are contained in Appendix 16.6. The remaining agencies did not report relative information within their files. 5.3 Physical Setting Source(s) The physical setting of the property was determined by review of the USGS 7.5 Minute topographic map, Guasti Quadrangle and information provided by EDR. A complete list of referenced used to findings is provided in Section 13.0, References. Topographically the site is relatively flat with a uniform gradient of less than two percent sloping toward the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south where it is collected along Arrow Route. The subject site is situated within a natural geomorphic province in southern California known as the Peninsular Ranges which are one of California’s eleven geomorphic provinces, each of which display distinct geologic and topographic features. The Peninsular Ranges are bordered to the east by the Salton Trough and to the north by the Transverse Ranges (San Bernardino, San Gabriel, and Santa Monica Mountains). The Peninsular Range province extends southerly to the Baja peninsula and westerly to the Pacific Ocean. Elongated northwesterly- trending valleys and mountains structurally controlled by regional tectonic forces with elevated erosional surfaces generally characterize this province. The eastern portion of the province has been extensively uplifted by faulting and represents the highest and most rugged terrain including Mount San Jacinto at well over 10,000 feet elevation. From the east, the province gradually descends to the west toward the Pacific Ocean. The Peninsular Ranges are traversed by numerous northwest trending faults creating and subdividing the province into many sub-parallel, northwest trending ranges and valleys. The northwesterly trending mountains and valleys are flanked by regional faults, which remain active today, including the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and Elsinore Fault zones. Page 457 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 Locally, the site is situated on a broad alluvial fan emanating from the San Gabriel Mountains to the north. These deposits consist of braised stream channel deposits of silt, sand, and gravel, and rocks. The largest sediments remain near the foothills while the finer material is distributed across the valley floor. 5.4 Historical Use Information on the Property The properties were developed as rural residential homes during the 1950’s based on review of historic aerial photographs. The residences remain on the eastern two parcels. The home on the western parcel was demolished around 1985. Prior to the residential development, the property was used for agricultural purpose and appears to have young citrus trees planted during 1938. No records are available beyond that year. 5.5 Historical Use Information on Adjoining Properties Uses in the area surrounding the property were assessed to the extent information were revealed in the course of researching the property itself. This included aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, city directories and historical topographic maps. The adjacent properties have similarly been open and vacant land in the past. Agriculture was conducted just west of the site from at least 1938. During the 1950’s residential improvements were constructed on the adjoining properties and by 1959 no agricultural use is noted on the surrounding properties. The gas station to the west appears in 1985 and the school to the north between 1994 and 2006. Groundwater Conditions The specific depth of groundwater occurrence at the site could not be determined through the scope of our work and likely fluctuates seasonally. In general, groundwater occurs within the alluvial sediment and is recharged seasonally from mountain streams to the north. The static water table below the site is likely on the order of more than 300 feet below the ground surface considering the regional topography, physical properties of the sediment, and distance to mountain streams. The direction of groundwater flow is south, concurrent with the natural topography. 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions The field reconnaissance was performed on Wednesday, June 13, 2018 to obtain information indicating the likelihood of identifying recognized environmental Page 458 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 8 conditions in connection with the property. The property was visually and physically observed from all adjacent public thoroughfares and by traversing it in order to observe the existence of or potential indications of the present and past uses, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum products, above and underground storage tanks, odors, pools of liquid, drums and other containers, potentially PCB-containing electrical and hydraulic equipment, fuel sources, stains and corrosion of structures and equipment, drains and sumps, pits, ponds, lagoons, stained soil and pavement, stressed vegetation, solid waste, trash, construction and demolition debris, mounds and depressions suggesting disposal, waste water or other liquid or any discharge into a drains, ditches, underground injection systems, or streams, wells, and septic systems and any other notable conditions which would indicate a recognized environmental condition in connection with the property. The western portion of the site exists as open, vacant land. The eastern portions are currently occupied by homes and were not accessible. Considering the size of the property, our methodology for site reconnaissance included review of government database lists, examination of aerial photographs, followed by site inspection of potential environmental conditions identified. The interior of the residence was not observed nor is inspection of the residence considered necessary as it is reportedly used solely for residential purposes. There were no other physical limitations or inaccessible site areas noted during our site visit. 6.2 General Site Setting The site is located along Arrow Route which exists as an improved, four-lane road. The property supports single-family residential development with no commercial or industrial operations. Topographically the site area is rather flat with a uniform gradient to the south. Site drainage is generally directed as sheet flow toward the south and is collected along storm water improvements associated with Arrow Route. Photographs of the site are presented in Appendix B. Page 459 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 9 6.3 Exterior Observations 6.4 Interior Observations The on-site homes are reportedly used for residential occupancy only. Accordingly no observation of the home interior is considered necessary or was conducted as part of this phase I. 7.0 INTERVIEWS 7.1 Interview with Owner Considering the open, vacant, and residential land use dating back to the 1950’s, interviews with the site manager and owner were not considered necessary. Information regarding the environmental conditions of the property and mandatory State disclosures will be provided by the owner as pertinent. Observations Identification Comments Indications of the present and past uses, treatment, storage, disposal or generation of hazardous substances and petroleum products No Aboveground storage tanks No Underground storage tanks No Odors No Pools of liquid No Drums and other containers No PCB-containing equipment Yes Pole mounted transformer Fuel sources No Stains No Corrosion of structures and equipment, No Drains and sumps No Pits No Ponds No Lagoons No Stained soil and pavement No Stressed vegetation No Solid waste, trash, construction and demolition debris Yes Various domestic trashes. Mounds and depressions No Waste water, liquid or discharges No Underground injection systems No Streams No Wells No Septic systems No Other No Page 460 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 10 The owner provided no information relative to recognized environmental conditions associated with the property. The owner is not aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the property; and any notices from any governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. No other recognized environmental conditions were indicated by the owner. 7.2 Interview with Site Manager No site manager is associated with the property. 7.3 Interview with Occupants The owners representative (Alan Smith) was contacted via telephone and reported no environmental impact to the site. The property has been used for residential purposes since the 1950’s according to records search and phone discussion with the tenant. 7.4 Interview with Local Government Officials Interviews were attempted with state and local government officials to obtain information that may indicate recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property. A reasonable attempt was made to interview staff of the following agencies: • The local fire department (Corona Fire Department) • Riverside County Department of Environmental Health • Riverside County Department of Land Use Services • Riverside County Solid Waste Management • California Regional Water Quality Control Board • City of Corona building permits. No pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was obtained from these agencies. 7.5 Interview with Others No other pertinent information relating to the environmental condition of the property was ascertained from interviews or discussions with others. Page 461 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 11 8.0 FINDINGS The following recognized environmental conditions were identified: x Asbestos containing materials and/or lead paint may be present within the structure based on the age of construction. This condition should be evaluated by a qualified professional prior to demolition. The following historical environmental conditions were identified: x No historical recognized environmental conditions were identified in addition to the aforementioned issues. The following de minimis conditions were identified, but are not considered recognized environmental conditions for reasons explained below: x Localized domestic trash on-site. 9.0 OPINION In summary, based on the findings of this environmental assessment, the likelihood of petroleum product contamination existing on, or migrating onto the subject site is considered low. Localized domestic trash and organic debris does not constitute a significant environmental impact to the site. The potential for asbestos containing materials and lead paint should be evaluated prior to demolition of the existing residence. Please understand that changes in the conditions of a property and surrounding areas can occur with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties. Accordingly, our findings relative to the observable site conditions are valid as of the date of our site visit, and historical research information is valid as of the dates specified. No significant data gaps that affected our ability to recognize environmental conditions were encountered. 10.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527 for the Property. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are described in Section 11.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property with the possible exception of asbestos containing materials and lead paint to be evaluated by others. Page 462 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 12 No additional recognized environmental conditions were noted through the scope of this study and no further action, other than described above, is considered necessary at this time. 11.0 DEVIATIONS No deletions, deviations, or other limitations to the standard of practice were imposed as part of our assessment. 12.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES No additional services are recommended at this time with the exception of asbestos and lead paint evaluation to be conducted prior to demolition of the building. 13.0 REREFENCES American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1527-93., pp 1-24 American Society of Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessment: Transaction Screen Process@, ASTM Designation: E 1528-93, pp 25-55. ASFE, Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments,, Second Edition, 1995 Carson, Scott E. And Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 14.0 SIGNATURE(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) This Phase I report has been prepared by the undersigned RGS Engineering Geology, Principal Engineering Geologist licensed in the State of Califo rnia. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, RGS Engineering Geology __________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Principal Engineering Geologist Page 463 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 13 15.0 QUALIFICATION(S) OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL(S) We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312 and we have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. The resumes of professionals involved in the collection, analysis, and reporting of environmental data for this report are provided in Appendix 16.9 for review. __________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Principal Engineering Geologist Page 464 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 14 16.0 APPENDICES Page 465 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 16.1 Site Location Map Page 466 Page 467 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 1 16.2 Site Plan Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 16.3 Site Photographs Page 473 Page 474 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 16.4 Historical Research Documentation Page 475 The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: June 11, 2018 5324295.5 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Page 476 2016 1"=500'Flight Year: 2016 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 1994 1"=500'Acquisition Date: June 01, 1994 USGS/DOQQ 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 03, 1989 USDA 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1985 USDA 1975 1"=500'Flight Date: August 01, 1975 USGS 1966 1"=500'Flight Date: April 16, 1966 USGS 1959 1"=500'Flight Date: October 16, 1959 USDA 1953 1"=500'Flight Date: February 02, 1953 USDA 1949 1"=500'Flight Date: May 21, 1949 USDA 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: May 27, 1938 USDA EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 06/11/18 Arbor Carwash Site Name:Client Name: RGS Geosciences 9744 Arrow Route 1225 Chestnut Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 UPLAND, CA 91784 EDR Inquiry #5324295.5 Contact:Christopher Krall Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5324295 5-page 2 Page 477 5324295.5 2016 = 500' Page 478 5324295.5 2012 = 500' Page 479 5324295.5 2009 = 500' Page 480 5324295.5 2006 = 500' Page 481 5324295.5 1994 = 500' Page 482 5324295.5 1989 = 500' Page 483 5324295.5 1985 = 500' Page 484 5324295.5 1975 = 500' Page 485 5324295.5 1966 = 500' Page 486 5324295.5 1959 = 500' Page 487 5324295.5 1953 = 500' Page 488 5324295.5 1949 = 500' Page 489 5324295.5 1938 = 500' Page 490 &ertiIied 6aQEorQŠ Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 June 07, 2018 5324295.3 Page 491 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results &RQWDFW('5,QTXLU\ Site 1aPe Client Name: Certification # 32 # 3URMeFt 06/07/18 9744 Arrow Route Arbor Carwash RGS Geosciences 1125 Chestnut St Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 5324295.3 Upland, CA 91730 Christopher Krall The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by RGS Geosciences were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 2C86-4BBA-BFC0 1702-01 UNMAPPED PROPERTY Arbor Carwash This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 2C86-4BBA-BFC0 RGS Geosciences (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5324295 3 2 Page 492 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 16.5 Regulatory Records Documentation Page 493 FORM-LBD-DCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Inquiry Number: 5324295.2s June 07, 2018 Page 494 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 44 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5324295.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 495 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 COORDINATES 34.0996540 - 34˚ 5’ 58.75’’Latitude (North): 117.5924900 - 117˚ 35’ 32.96’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 445347.2UTM X (Meters): 3773169.2UTM Y (Meters): 1156 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5620426 GUASTI, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140603Portions of Photo from: USDASource: Page 496 5324295.2s Page 2 23 FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 5032, 0.953, NW 22 AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET ENVIROSTOR, HIST UST Lower 3601, 0.682, WSW 21 RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 2944, 0.558, North 20 INTER-METRO IND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE ENVIROSTOR, San Bern. Co. Permit Lower 2516, 0.477, West 19 THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD LUST, HIST CORTESE Higher 2505, 0.474, NNE 18 PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS RCRA-SQG, LUST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, FINDS,... Lower 2263, 0.429, WSW 17 ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO ENVIROSTOR, VCP Higher 1914, 0.363, East 16 INSPIRON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Lower 911, 0.173, SSW C15 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C14 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C13 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE HIST UST Lower 380, 0.072, South C12 CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE SWEEPS UST, HIST UST, CA FID UST, San Bern. Co.... Lower 367, 0.070, South B11 MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 230, 0.044, WSW B10 HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW EDR Hist Auto Lower 168, 0.032, WSW A9 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 107, 0.020, SSE B8 JOHN R HIX (14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD HIST UST Higher 87, 0.016, West B7 WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV EDR Hist Auto Higher 87, 0.016, West B6 MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Higher 87, 0.016, West B5 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST, San Bern. Co. Permit, Notify 65 Higher 87, 0.016, West B4 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU LUST Higher 87, 0.016, West B3 EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE RCRA-LQG Higher 87, 0.016, West B2 MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE UST Higher 87, 0.016, West A1 EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY #K DRYCLEANERS Lower 60, 0.011, SE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 9744 ARROW ROUTE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS Page 497 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System Page 498 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land CPS-SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database CDL Clandestine Drug Labs Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing Page 499 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List EMI Emissions Inventory Data Page 500 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List PROJECT PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) PROD WATER PONDS PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) OTHER OIL GAS OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) NON-CASE INFO NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) MILITARY PRIV SITES MILITARY PRIV SITES (GEOTRACKER) UIC GEO UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) WELL STIM PROJ Well Stimulation Project (GEOTRACKER) SAMPLING POINT SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) CIWQS California Integrated Water Quality System EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. Page 501 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-LQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPO 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B3 8 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/11/2017 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ INSPIRON CORP 8600 ARCHIBALD AVE SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) 16 23 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there are 6 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.) 17 25 Facility Id: 60002530 Status: Active RC PLAZA 8013 ARCHIBALD AVENU N 1/2 - 1 (0.558 mi.) 21 37 Page 502 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 Facility Id: 60002366 Status: No Further Action FORMER TOWN CENTER C 9116 EAST FOOTHILL B NW 1/2 - 1 (0.953 mi.) 23 41 Facility Id: 60002569 Status: Active PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B11 17 Facility Id: 36010022 Status: No Further Action INTER-METRO IND CORP 9393 ARROW RTE W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.477 mi.) 20 35 Facility Id: 71002573 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation AVERY DENNISON-MPD 9292 NINTH STREET WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.682 mi.) 22 40 Facility Id: 71002437 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 4 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B4 10 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Facility Status: Case Closed Global ID: T0607101726 MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0607101726 THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) 19 32 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607100225 Global ID: T0607100225 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.429 mi.) 18 27 Database: LUST REG 8, Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Status: Completed - Case Closed Page 503 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Facility Status: Case Closed Global Id: T0607100092 Global ID: T0607100092 State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 UST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B2 8 Database: UST, Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Facility Id: 86009049 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ALLMARK PLAZA 10060-10080 ARROW RO E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.363 mi.) 17 25 Status: Active Facility Id: 60002530 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites SCH: This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category. depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the. environment they pose. A review of the SCH list, as provided by EDR, and dated 01/30/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SCH site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MULBERRY EARLY EDUCA ARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARR WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.044 mi.) B11 17 Page 504 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 Facility Id: 36010022 Status: No Further Action Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 2 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B6 13 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 39175 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Status: A Tank Status: A Comp Number: 8858 HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 5 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ JOHN R HIX (14-313) 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B8 15 Facility Id: 00000039175 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 CHINO BASIN MUNICIPA 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C13 21 Facility Id: 00000054010 CHINO BASIN WATER DI 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C14 22 Facility Id: 00000056788 MAIN OFFICE 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.072 mi.) C15 22 Facility Id: 00000008858 Page 505 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tank locations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 2 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL OIL 8477 ARCHIBALD W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B6 13 Facility Id: 36000337 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Facility Id: 36003408 Status: A Other Ascertainable Records DRYCLEANERS: A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaners’ agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ EXPERT CLEANER 9755 ARROW HWY #K SE 0 - 1/8 (0.011 mi.) A1 8 Database: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST, Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 2 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ THRIFTY OIL #320 9888 FOOTHILL BLVD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.474 mi.) 19 32 Reg Id: 083601836T PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PNEU DRAULICS INC 8575 HELMS WSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.429 mi.) 18 27 Reg Id: 083600858T Page 506 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 San Bern. Co. Permit: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division. A review of the San Bern. Co. Permit list, as provided by EDR, and dated 11/30/2017 has revealed that there are 2 San Bern. Co. Permit sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 Facility Status: INACTIVE Facility Id: FA0004767 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHINO BASIN MWD 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE S 0 - 1/8 (0.070 mi.) C12 19 Facility Status: ACTIVE Facility Id: FA0016208 Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/23/2018 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MOBIL #18 -AJ6 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENU W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B5 11 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Auto list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 2 EDR Hist Auto sites within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WENTLAND MOBILE 8477 ARCHIBALD AV W 0 - 1/8 (0.016 mi.) B7 15 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HERNANDEZ JOHN R 9710 ARROW WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.032 mi.) B10 16 Page 507 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CALIFORNIA DRY CLEAN 9755 ARROW RTE SSE 0 - 1/8 (0.020 mi.) A9 16 Page 508 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5324295.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 There were no unmapped sites in this report. Page 509 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 kV 1 1320 1280 128 0 1 2 4 1 2 4 01240 1 2 0 0 1200 12001160 1160 116011 2 0 11 2 0 1 1 2 0 10 1 0 8010 8 01080 Page 510 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1160 Page 511 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 6 NR 3 2 0 1 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 4 NR NR 2 0 2 0.500LUST TC5324295.2s Page 4Page512 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CPS-SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250SWEEPS UST 5 NR NR NR 0 5 0.250HIST UST 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS TC5324295.2s Page 5Page513 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MCS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EMI 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ENF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HAZNET TC5324295.2s Page 6Page514 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICE 2 NR NR 2 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPDES 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250San Bern. Co. Permit 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 1 NR 0 0 0 1 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROJECT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PROD WATER PONDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001OTHER OIL GAS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NON-CASE INFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MILITARY PRIV SITES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC GEO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001WELL STIM PROJ 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SAMPLING POINT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CIWQS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 2 NR NR NR NR 2 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 33 0 3 7 1 22 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5324295.2s Page 7Page515 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0UTM North: 0UTM East: DRY CLEANING, DRY-TO-DRY NON-VENT, PERCBCAT Description: 000601BCAT Number: Not reportedPermit Status: 909 4819626Representative Telephone: SY KYONG JORepresentative Name: OStatus: Not reportedPermit Number: 304975Application Number: 105454Facility ID: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: 60 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.011 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SE 9755 ARROW HWY #K N/A A1 DRYCLEANERSEXPERT CLEANER S121693635 -117.591658Longitude: 34.101006Latitude: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYPermitting Agency: 86009049Facility ID: UST: 87 ft. Site 1 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A B2 USTMOBIL OIL CORP 11AJ6 U003784751 cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 800-253-8054Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: JOHN HOOVERContact: LAKEWOOD, CO 80228 12265 WEST BAYAUD AVEMailing address: CAL000050535EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730-3662 8477 ARCHIBALD AVEFacility address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454Facility name: 03/07/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 87 ft. Site 2 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVE CAL000050535 B3 RCRA-LQGEXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 1007200051 TC5324295.2s Page 8Page516 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/24/2002Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: FAIRFAX, VA 22937 3225 GALLOWS RDOwner/operator address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/24/2002Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued) 1007200051 TC5324295.2s Page 9Page517 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: EXXON MOBIL OIL CORPSite name: 02/28/2002Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION NO 11454 (Continued) 1007200051 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/5/2001Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 2/20/2001Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 2/20/2001How Stopped Date: T0607101726Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 2001012Local Case Num: Not reportedCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 87 ft. Site 3 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A B4 LUSTMOBIL #18 -AJ6 S105774326 TC5324295.2s Page 10Page518 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: JC3Staff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S105774326 T0607101726Global Id: LUST: 9513206375Phone Number: rose.scott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0607101726Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: jcrutsinger@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: JACKSON CRUTSINGERContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607101726Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 2001012Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: Not reportedRB Case Number: JCCase Worker: 11/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.593008Longitude: 34.099656Latitude: T0607101726Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607101726Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: 87 ft. Site 4 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 Notify 65RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West San Bern. Co. Permit8477 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A B5 LUSTMOBIL #18 -AJ6 S100179548 TC5324295.2s Page 11Page519 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011877Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: SPECIAL GENERATORPermit Category: PT0002341Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER 0-10 EMPLOYEES (W/GEN PRMT)Permit Category: PT0002345Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER - UST ONLYPermit Category: PT0002338Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: 11/05/2001Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607101726Global Id: 02/20/2001Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607101726Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 03/02/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0607101726Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 02/20/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0607101726Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 02/20/2001Date: OtherAction Type: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S100179548 TC5324295.2s Page 12Page520 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedIncident Description: Not reportedIssue Date: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: NOTIFY 65: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011879Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 07/31/2004Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: UST OWNERSHIP/OPERATING PERMIT (PER UST)Permit Category: PT0011878Permit Number: WESTERN FUEL GROUPOwner: FA0004767Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: MOBIL #18 -AJ6 (Continued)S100179548 334Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: OILTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 333Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 87 ft. Site 5 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West CA FID UST8477 ARCHIBALD N/A B6 SWEEPS USTMOBIL OIL S101590945 TC5324295.2s Page 13Page521 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8477 ARCHIBALDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00039175Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36000337Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000004SWRCB Tank Id: 336Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: LEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 335Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 07-28-92Action Date: 07-28-92Referral Date: 44-020967Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 39175Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-08-88Active Date: 8000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-039175-000002SWRCB Tank Id: MOBIL OIL (Continued)S101590945 TC5324295.2s Page 14Page522 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: MOBIL OIL (Continued)S101590945 Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts2001 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts2000 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1999 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1998 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1997 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Auto And Truck Equipment And Parts1996 RANCHO MOBILE AUTO SVC & REPR Gasoline Service Stations1993 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1992 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1991 GEORGES MOBIL Gasoline Service Stations1988 WENTLAND MOBILE Gasoline Service Stations1987 WENTLAND MOBILE Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 87 ft. Site 6 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD AV N/A B7 EDR Hist AutoWENTLAND MOBILE 1020706997 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0333Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0004Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Owner City,St,Zip: 612 SOUTH FLOWER STREETOwner Address: MOBIL OIL CORPORATIONOwner Name: 7149808440Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000039175Facility ID: STATERegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002A273.pdfURL: 0002A273File Number: HIST UST: 87 ft. Site 7 of 9 in cluster B 0.016 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1156 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West 8477 ARCHIBALD N/A B8 HIST USTJOHN R HIX (14-313)U001569289 TC5324295.2s Page 15Page523 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0336Container Num: 004Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0335Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 0334Container Num: JOHN R HIX (14-313) (Continued)U001569289 Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2003 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2002 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2001 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Drycleaning Plants, Except Rugs2000 CALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Cleaner 107 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.020 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1153 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SSE 9755 ARROW RTE N/A A9 EDR Hist CleanerCALIFORNIA DRY CLEANING 1019947310 Gasoline Service Stations1973 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1972 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1971 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1970 BARRENA MARTIN Gasoline Service Stations1969 BARRENA MARTIN Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Auto 168 ft. Site 8 of 9 in cluster B 0.032 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW 9710 ARROW N/A B10 EDR Hist AutoHERNANDEZ JOHN R 1020427704 TC5324295.2s Page 16Page524 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gasoline Service Stations1980 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1979 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1978 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1977 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1976 HERNANDEZ JOHN R Gasoline Service Stations1974 HERNANDEZ JOHN R HERNANDEZ JOHN R (Continued)1020427704 Not reportedComments: 11/02/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 36010022Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404252Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTRAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO CO. SUPT. OF SCHOOLSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTERAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: 30004-NO 30006-NO 30007-NO 30008-NO 30013-NOConfirmed COC: Chlordane DDD DDE DDT LeadPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.5918Longitude: 34.0999Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 23Senate: 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 6.27Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404252Site Code: 04/19/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 36010022Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 230 ft. Site 9 of 9 in cluster B 0.044 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1154 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW SCHARCHIBALD AVENUE/ARROW ROUTE N/A B11 ENVIROSTORMULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER S107736794 TC5324295.2s Page 17Page525 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SOILPotential Description: 30004-NO, 30006-NO, 30007-NO, 30008-NO, 30013-NOConfirmed COC: Chlordane, DDD, DDE, DDT, LeadPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.5918Longitude: 34.0999Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 04/19/2002Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 23Senate: 40Assembly: 404252Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 6.27Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 36010022Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued) S107736794 TC5324295.2s Page 18Page526 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/19/2002Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/13/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 11/02/2001Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 36010022Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404252Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO COE-MULBERRY EARLY ED CTRAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: SAN BERNARDINO CO. SUPT. OF SCHOOLSAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATION CENTERAlias Name: MULBERRY EARLY EDUCATIONAL CENTER (Continued) S107736794 09-10-91Referral Date: 44-020130Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 8858Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: 367 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C 0.070 mi.San Bern. Co. Permit Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South HIST UST8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C12 SWEEPS USTCHINO BASIN MWD S101618860 TC5324295.2s Page 19Page527 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CA FID UST: Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/00029BF0.pdfURL: 00029BF0File Number: HIST UST: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 06-28-88Active Date: 5000Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-008858-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 3Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: 09-10-91Action Date: CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued)S101618860 TC5324295.2s Page 20Page528 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/30/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 1-3 CHEMICALS SPECIALPermit Category: PT0036191Permit Number: Verizon WirelessOwner: FA0016208Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00054010Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36003408Facility ID: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00008858Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36003408Facility ID: CHINO BASIN MWD (Continued)S101618860 OtherFacility Type: 00000054010Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C13 HIST USTCHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI U001569274 TC5324295.2s Page 21Page529 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00050000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUEOwner Address: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DIOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: D. PETERSContact Name: PUBLIC AGENCYOther Type: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DI (Continued) U001569274 Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 5Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVENUEOwner Address: CHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICTOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: D. PETERSContact Name: PUBLIC AGENCYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056788Facility ID: STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C14 HIST USTCHINO BASIN WATER DISTRICT U001569275 STATERegion: Not reportedURL: Not reportedFile Number: HIST UST: 380 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C 0.072 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1147 ft. < 1/8 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 South 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE N/A C15 HIST USTMAIN OFFICE U001569296 TC5324295.2s Page 22Page530 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00009000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: NUMBER 2Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00012000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: NUMBER 1.Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: NUMBER 3Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: CUCAMONGA, CA 91730Owner City,St,Zip: 8555 ARCHIBALD AVE.Owner Address: CHINO BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DIOwner Name: 7149871712Telephone: JERALD C. ROGERSContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000008858Facility ID: MAIN OFFICE (Continued)U001569296 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 ARCHIBALD AVEMailing address: CAD107724254EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8600 ARCHIBALD AVEFacility address: INSPIRON CORPFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 911 ft. 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1138 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHORANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 SSW FINDS8600 ARCHIBALD AVE CAD107724254 16 RCRA-SQGINSPIRON CORP 1000347777 TC5324295.2s Page 23Page531 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 110002667123Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: OMNICARE, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: INSPIRON CORP (Continued)1000347777 TC5324295.2s Page 24Page532 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002667123DFR URL: 110002667123Registry ID: 1000347777Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System INSPIRON CORP (Continued)1000347777 Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002530Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401793Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 0208-321-32-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 0208-321-32-0000APN: -117.5854Longitude: 34.09996Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Amit PathakProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 2.19Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401793Site Code: 08/15/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60002530Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1914 ft. 0.363 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1159 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 East VCP10060-10080 ARROW ROUTE N/A 17 ENVIROSTORALLMARK PLAZA S121475143 TC5324295.2s Page 25Page533 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Signed and sent a copy to the RP.Comments: 11/13/2017Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002530Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401793Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 0208-321-32-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 0208-321-32-0000APN: 34.09996 / -117.5854Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/15/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401793Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Yolanda GarzaSupervisor: Amit PathakProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 2.19Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002530Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/23/2018Schedule Due Date: Removal Action WorkplanSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Signed and sent a copy to the RP.Comments: 11/13/2017Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued)S121475143 TC5324295.2s Page 26Page534 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 03/23/2018Schedule Due Date: Removal Action WorkplanSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: ALLMARK PLAZA (Continued)S121475143 NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: PNEU DRAULICSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 714-980-5366Contact telephone: USContact country: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8575 HELMSContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD981370810EPA ID: RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 8575 HELMSFacility address: PNEU DRAULICS INCFacility name: 01/24/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: CIWQS San Bern. Co. Permit HIST CORTESE ECHO 2263 ft.FINDS 0.429 mi.CA FID UST Relative: Lower Actual: 1141 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTRANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW LUST8575 HELMS CAD981370810 18 RCRA-SQGPNEU DRAULICS INC 1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 27Page535 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0607100092Global Id: 9093868419Phone Number: crichards@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: CATHERINE RICHARDSContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 87031Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: 083600858TRB Case Number: CR2Case Worker: 05/23/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.598866Longitude: 34.097785Latitude: T0607100092Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100092Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 28Page536 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CLOSEnf Type: 9TH STREETCross Street: ETITAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 87031Local Case Num: 083600858TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 05/23/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607100092Global Id: 05/10/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0607100092Global Id: 03/31/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 03/31/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Not reportedAction: 03/31/1988Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/23/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 03/31/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100092Global Id: LUST: 9517824903Phone Number: valerie.jahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 29Page537 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Capacity: ATank Status: 36-000-009068-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 09-21-88Created Date: 09-10-91Action Date: 09-10-91Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 9068Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: UPPER SANTA ANA VALLHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: CR2Staff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.5997403Longitude: 34.0978012Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: YesInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 5/10/1988Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 5/10/1988Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/23/1997Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/31/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 5/10/1988Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0607100092Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 30Page538 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002683953DFR URL: 110002683953Registry ID: 1000423885Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002683953Registry ID: FINDS: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: RANCHO CUCAMONGA 91730Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 8575 HELMSMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 36000278Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1Number Of Tanks: UNKNOWNContent: PSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: 09-21-88Active Date: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 TC5324295.2s Page 31Page539 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: 0Violations within 5 years: 0Enforcement Actions within 5 years: Not reportedTTWQ: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedMajor/Minor: Not reportedDesign Flow: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 06/29/2010Termination Date: 05/27/2008Effective Date: Not reportedAdoption Date: CAS000002NPDES Number: 8 36C352003WDID: 99-08DWOrder Number: Storm water constructionRegulatory Measure Type: TerminatedRegulatory Measure Status: CONSTWProgram: 8Region: Not reportedSIC/NAICS: Construction - CommercialPlace/Project Type: 8575 Helms Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730Agency Address: Pneudraulics IncAgency: CIWQS: 05/31/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 11-30 CHEMICALSPermit Category: PT0002352Permit Number: PNEUDRAULICS INCOwner: FA0005354Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 05/31/2018Expiration Date: ACTIVEFacility Status: SMALL QUANTITY GENERATORPermit Category: PT0002353Permit Number: PNEUDRAULICS INCOwner: FA0005354Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: 083600858TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 36Facility County Code: PNEU DRAULICS INC (Continued)1000423885 T0607100225Global Id: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100225Geo Track: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLead Agency: LUST: 2505 ft. 0.474 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1208 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 NNE HIST CORTESE9888 FOOTHILL BLVD N/A 19 LUSTTHRIFTY OIL #320 S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 32Page540 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/06/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: Leak ReportedAction: 04/24/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 01/30/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/06/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/06/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: 9093868419Phone Number: crichards@sbcfire.orgEmail: SAN BERNARDINOCity: 620 SOUTH E STREETAddress: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYOrganization Name: CATHERINE RICHARDSContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100225Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0607100225Global Id: LUST: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: 91001Local Case Number: Local AgencyFile Location: SAN BERNARDINO COUNTYLocal Agency: 083601836TRB Case Number: CR2Case Worker: 05/06/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: -117.589509Longitude: 34.106933Latitude: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 33Page541 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.5893911Longitude: 34.106796Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: NoInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 4/15/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 1/30/1991Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/6/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/6/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 4/15/1991Enter Date: 1/30/1991How Stopped Date: T0607100225Global ID: Other SourceLeak Source: OverfillLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Subsurface MonitoringHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: RAMONACross Street: approved site Excavate and Dispose - remove contaminated soil and dispose inAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 91001Local Case Num: 083601836TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: San BernardinoCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 05/06/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0607100225Global Id: 01/30/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0607100225Global Id: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 TC5324295.2s Page 34Page542 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 083601836TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 36Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: UPPER SANTA ANA VALLHydr Basin #: 36000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: CR2Staff Initials: CABStaff: THRIFTY OIL #320 (Continued)S103950760 Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002573Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000477573Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD076053701Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6291Longitude: 34.09940Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 25Senate: 41Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002573Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2516 ft. 0.477 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1143 ft. 1/4-1/2 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 West San Bern. Co. Permit9393 ARROW RTE N/A 20 ENVIROSTORINTER-METRO IND CORP S110493943 TC5324295.2s Page 35Page543 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZMAT HANDLER 51-100 EMPLOYEES (W/GEN PRMT)Permit Category: PT0001581Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: CA ANNUAL FEEPermit Category: PT0001580Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR - 51-100 EMPLOYEESPermit Category: PT0001582Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: 09/30/2006Expiration Date: INACTIVEFacility Status: EPCRA FACILITYPermit Category: PT0014569Permit Number: BESSEMER HOLDINGS, LPOwner: FA0003998Facility ID: SAN BERNARDINORegion: San Bern. Co. Permit: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: INTER-METRO IND CORP (Continued) S110493943 TC5324295.2s Page 36Page544 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002366Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401749Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-77-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-76-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-75-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-74-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-73-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-72-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-70-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-69-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-68-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000,APN: -117.5925Longitude: 34.10801Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 3.38Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401749Site Code: 10/23/2017Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 60002366Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 2944 ft. 0.558 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1224 ft. 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 North VCP8013 ARCHIBALD AVENUE N/A 21 ENVIROSTORRC PLAZA S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 37Page545 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No Further ActionStatus: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401749Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Xihong (Scarlett) ZhaiProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 3.38Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002366Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16.Comments: 09/13/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination.Comments: 10/19/2017Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/03/2017Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Mailed annual cost estimate letter.Comments: 09/07/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement.Comments: 07/07/2016Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 38Page546 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DTSC approved the SSI report with a No Further Action determination.Comments: 10/19/2017Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/03/2017Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Mailed annual cost estimate letter.Comments: 09/07/2017Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC branch chief and the RP signed the agreement.Comments: 07/07/2016Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002366Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401749Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-77-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-76-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-75-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-74-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-73-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-72-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-70-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-69-0000Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 1077-641-68-0000Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: 1077-641-75-0000, 1077-641-76-0000, 1077-641-77-0000 1077-641-72-0000, 1077-641-73-0000, 1077-641-74-0000, 1077-641-68-0000, 1077-641-69-0000, 1077-641-70-0000,APN: 34.10801 / -117.5925Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/23/2017Status Date: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 TC5324295.2s Page 39Page547 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Annual Cost Estimate letter sent to RP on 09/13/16.Comments: 09/13/2016Completed Date: Annual Oversight Cost EstimateCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: RC PLAZA (Continued)S118757317 Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002437Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD050745363Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6038Longitude: 34.09663Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 23Senate: 40Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002437Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3601 ft. 0.682 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1123 ft. 1/2-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 WSW HIST UST9292 NINTH STREET N/A 22 ENVIROSTORAVERY DENNISON-MPD S110493657 TC5324295.2s Page 40Page548 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here for Geo Tracker PDF: Not reportedLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: Not reportedTank Used for: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: Not reportedTank Num: Not reportedTotal Tanks: Not reportedOwner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: Not reportedOwner Name: Not reportedTelephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedFacility ID: Not reportedRegion: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ustpdfs/pdf/0002999E.pdfURL: 0002999EFile Number: HIST UST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: AVERY DENNISON-MPD (Continued) S110493657 Robert SengaSupervisor: Anantaramam PeddadaProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 1.06Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401800Site Code: 10/20/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: 60002569Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 5032 ft. 0.953 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1219 ft. 1/2-1 RANCH CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 NW VCP9116 EAST FOOTHILL BOULEVARD, SUITE 102 N/A 23 ENVIROSTORFORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 41Page549 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Programs Code: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: 401800Site Code: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Robert SengaSupervisor: Anantaramam PeddadaProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 1.06Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60002569Facility ID: VCP: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 05/02/2018Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site ScreeningFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/16/2018Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002569Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401800Alias Name: SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEConfirmed COC: Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.6063Longitude: 34.10765Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Voluntary Cleanup ProgramSpecial Program: , 23Senate: , 40Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued) S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 42Page550 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: 05/02/2018Schedule Due Date: Phase 1Schedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDESchedule Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site Characterization ReportFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: 2018Future Due Date: Site ScreeningFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDEFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/16/2018Completed Date: Voluntary Cleanup AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60002569Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401800Alias Name: SOIL, SV, UEPotential Description: 30022Confirmed COC: 30022Potential COC: DRY CLEANINGPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: 34.10765 / -117.6063Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/20/2017Status Date: ActiveStatus: FORMER TOWN CENTER CLEANERS (Continued) S121475146 TC5324295.2s Page 43Page551 ORPHAN SUMMARY City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s) Count: 0 records. NO SITES FOUND TC5324295.2s Page 44 Page 552 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5324295.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 553 Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5324295.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 554 SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 555 RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 02/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 78 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 556 Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5324295.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 557 LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. TC5324295.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 558 Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 559 INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 01/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CPS-SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 560 SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 561 SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST CLOSURE: Proposed Closure of Underground Storage Tank (UST) Cases UST cases that are being considered for closure by either the State Water Resources Control Board or the Executive Director have been posted for a 60-day public comment period. UST Case Closures being proposed for consideration by the State Water Resources Control Board. These are primarily UST cases that meet closure criteria under the decisional framework in State Water Board Resolution No. 92-49 and other Board orders. UST Case Closures proposed for consideration by the Executive Director pursuant to State Water Board Resolution No. 2012-0061. These are cases that meet the criteria of the Low-Threat UST Case Closure Policy. UST Case Closure Review Denials and Approved Orders. TC5324295.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 562 Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-327-7844 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MILITARY UST SITES: Military UST Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military ust sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 563 INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 134 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 564 INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. TC5324295.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 565 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/14/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 566 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. TC5324295.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 567 Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO AST: Aboveground Storage Tank Site Listing Aboveground storage tank sites Date of Government Version: 04/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records TC5324295.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 568 LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 01/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 0 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 02/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 04/24/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 569 LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. TC5324295.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 570 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. TC5324295.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 571 Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans TC5324295.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 572 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/08/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 126 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 573 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 03/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/18/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. TC5324295.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 574 Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Biennially TC5324295.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 575 INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. TC5324295.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 576 Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 01/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 12/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 577 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 01/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2018 Number of Days to Update: 84 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/23/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5324295.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 578 CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON: CUPA LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON list of facilities associated with the various CUPA programs in Livermore-Pleasanton Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department Telephone: 925-454-2361 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO: CUPA SAN FRANCISCO CO Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 04/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: San Francisco County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 415-252-3896 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEAN AVAQMD: DRYCLEAN AVAQMD A listing of dry cleaners in the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District Telephone: 661-723-8070 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST: DRYCLEAN SOUTH COAST A listing of dry cleaners in the South Coast Air Quality Management District Date of Government Version: 03/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: South Coast Air Quality Management District Telephone: 909-396-3211 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. TC5324295.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 579 Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 147 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. TC5324295.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 580 Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/06/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. TC5324295.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 581 Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water boards review found that more than one-third of the region’s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 03/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 582 MILITARY PRIV SITES: Military Privatized Sites (GEOTRACKER) Military privatized sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER OIL GAS: OTHER OIL & GAS (GEOTRACKER) Other Oil & Gas Projects sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROD WATER PONDS: PROD WATER PONDS (GEOTRACKER) Produced water ponds sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies PROJECT: PROJECT (GEOTRACKER) Projects sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NON-CASE INFO: NON-CASE INFO (GEOTRACKER) Non-Case Information sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAMPLING POINT: SAMPLING POINT (GEOTRACKER) Sampling point - public sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies WELL STIM PROJ: WELL SAMP PROJ (GEOTRACKER) Includes areas of groundwater monitoring plans, a depiction of the monitoring network, and the facilities, boundaries, and subsurface characteristics of the oilfield and the features (oil and gas wells, produced water ponds, UIC wells, water supply wells, etc?) being monitored Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 583 CIWQS: The California Integrated Water Quality System The California Integrated Water Quality System (CIWQS) is a computer system used by the State and Regional Water Quality Control Boards to track information about places of environmental interest, manage permits and other orders, track inspections, and manage violations and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 60 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-794-4977 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC GEO: UIC GEO (GEOTRACKER) Underground control injection sites Date of Government Version: 03/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: State Water Resource Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 12/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. TC5324295.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 584 Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/09/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 585 CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 01/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 03/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 586 CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 01/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 04/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually IMPERIAL COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 587 CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 588 CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/17/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. TC5324295.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 589 Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 04/11/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2018 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 02/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/11/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 590 CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. TC5324295.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 591 Date of Government Version: 02/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/03/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 02/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 01/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/24/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5324295.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 592 Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 03/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/04/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 11/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 593 Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 03/05/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Oversight Program Listing A listing of all LOP release sites that are or were under the County of San Diego’s jurisdiction. Included are closed or transferred cases, open cases, and cases that did not have a case type indicated. The cases without a case type are mostly complaints; however, some of them could be LOP cases. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 858-505-6874 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. TC5324295.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 594 Date of Government Version: 11/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/19/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/02/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/02/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 11/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/24/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 595 Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/20/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/10/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 02/04/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 596 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 03/22/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/09/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/06/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 01/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/17/2018 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: TC5324295.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 597 CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 01/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/19/2018 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 03/19/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/17/2018 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/20/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/16/2018 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 04/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 12/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. TC5324295.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 598 Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 12/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/06/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/2018 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 03/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 03/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 03/29/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/16/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/21/2018 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 04/25/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5324295.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 599 OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/14/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/27/2018 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/23/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/13/2018 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/12/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/30/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/03/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 03/08/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/25/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5324295.2s Page GR-48 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 600 Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 TC5324295.2s Page GR-49 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 601 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5324295.2s Page GR-50 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Page 602 TC5324295.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5620426 GUASTI, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 1156 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3773169.2UTM Y (Meters): 445347.2UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.59249 - 117˚ 35’ 32.96’’Longitude (West): 34.099654 - 34˚ 5’ 58.75’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 9744 ARROW ROUTE ARBOR CARWASH TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM Page 603 TC5324295.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 1156 ft. North South West East10621071108310941102111311231133114411561167118111931207122012361250126712831170116311571152115211521154115711561156115611521157115811521162116311621163General SouthGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 604 TC5324295.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapGUASTI NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8629H FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8628J Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06071C8630J Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 605 TC5324295.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 606 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles Page 607 TC5324295.2s Page A-6 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HanfordSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam59 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HANFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 608 TC5324295.2s Page A-7 1/2 - 1 Mile SSEUSGS40000140834 4 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthUSGS40000140837 2 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam59 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 609 TC5324295.2s Page A-8 1/2 - 1 Mile SE1071 3 1/2 - 1 Mile South3149 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Page 610 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.144014 0 0 13601 3 601320 1320 1 3201 2 8 0 1280 1280 801 2 4 0 1 2 4 01240 1 2 0 0 1200 12001 1 6 0 1160 116011 2 0 1 1 20 1 1 20 112 0 1080 1 0 8010 8 01080 1 0 4 0 1 040 1040 CA Page 611 TC5324295.2s Page A-10 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:05-MAR-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: CUCAMONGAArea Served: 34398Connections:128000Pop Served: CUCAMONGA 91730 P O BOX 638 Organization That Operates System: CUCAMONGA CWDSystem Name: 3610018System Number: WELL 30Source Name: UndefinedPrecision:340525.0 1173530.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNTStation Type:13District Number: San BeernardinoCounty:3610018037FRDS Number: TANUser ID:036/018-005Prime Station Code: Water System Information: 1 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 3149CA WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 612 TC5324295.2s Page A-11 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:06-AUG-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 39. MG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.3 UG/LFindings:16-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 41. MG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.7 UG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 613 TC5324295.2s Page A-12 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: DIBROMOCHLOROPROPANE (DBCP)Chemical: 0.22 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.6 UG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:13-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 18. MG/LFindings:05-NOV-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:15-OCT-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:01-OCT-12Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:18-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:10-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:04-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:28-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:20-AUG-12Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 614 TC5324295.2s Page A-13 PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.4 UG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:07-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:31-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 30. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 42. MG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:11-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:11-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:28-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:21-OCT-13Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.2 UG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 615 TC5324295.2s Page A-14 ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.8Findings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 410. USFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23. MG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 19. MG/LFindings:10-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:02-JUN-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 40. MG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 28. MG/LFindings:19-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.3 UG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:01-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 39. MG/LFindings:01-MAY-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 616 TC5324295.2s Page A-15 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:21-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 7800. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 270. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: VANADIUMChemical: 16. UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.21 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 20. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 8.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 24. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 9.9 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 48. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 160. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 617 TC5324295.2s Page A-16 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 29. MG/LFindings:08-DEC-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:20-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 26. MG/LFindings:16-SEP-14Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 4.6 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 31. MG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 618 TC5324295.2s Page A-17 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:11-MAY-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 18. MG/LFindings:04-MAY-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 23. MG/LFindings:29-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 21. MG/LFindings:20-APR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:13-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:13-APR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:06-APR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:30-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 25. MG/LFindings:30-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5. UG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 32. MG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.7 UG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 619 TC5324295.2s Page A-18 PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.5 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:08-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:31-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:31-AUG-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:24-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:24-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 19. MG/LFindings:18-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 22. MG/LFindings:11-AUG-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:03-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:03-AUG-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 16. MG/LFindings:27-JUL-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:20-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 34. MG/LFindings:20-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 16. MG/LFindings:13-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:07-JUL-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 17. MG/LFindings:29-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6. UG/LFindings:22-JUN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 38. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:08-JUN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:01-JUN-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5. UG/LFindings:11-MAY-15Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 620 TC5324295.2s Page A-19 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.7 MG/LFindings:01-FEB-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:12-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:12-JAN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:21-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:21-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:07-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:07-DEC-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:30-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 2.9 MG/LFindings:30-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:23-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:16-NOV-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:09-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:09-NOV-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:26-OCT-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:19-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 33. MG/LFindings:19-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 14. MG/LFindings:14-OCT-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 14. MG/LFindings:28-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:21-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 36. MG/LFindings:21-SEP-15Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:14-SEP-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 35. MG/LFindings:14-SEP-15Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 621 TC5324295.2s Page A-20 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.8 MG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.1 MG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6. UG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.6 MG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.8 MG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:15-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.8 UG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 9.3 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.6 UG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.9 MG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:07-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:07-MAR-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:29-FEB-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:29-FEB-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:01-FEB-16Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 622 TC5324295.2s Page A-21 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.9 UG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.3 MG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:27-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.5 MG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.5 UG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.2 MG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.4 MG/LFindings:22-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:15-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:08-AUG-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.5 UG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.6 MG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:26-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.7 MG/LFindings:18-JUL-16Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 623 TC5324295.2s Page A-22 PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.8 UG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 9.9 MG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8. MG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.8 UG/LFindings:20-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:20-MAR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.5 UG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.2 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 3.5 MG/LFindings:14-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:07-NOV-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.4 UG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.6 MG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.3 UG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 624 TC5324295.2s Page A-23 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.2 MG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220. MG/LFindings:02-AUG-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.4 UG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.8 MG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.2 UG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.6 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.7 UG/LFindings:03-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.3 UG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.2 UG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 4.9 UG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.1 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 6.1 UG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 625 TC5324295.2s Page A-24 CUCAMONGAArea Served: 34398Connections:128000Pop Served: CUCAMONGA 91730 P O BOX 638 Organization That Operates System: CUCAMONGA CWDSystem Name: 3610018System Number: WELL 05Source Name: 100 Feet (one Second)Precision:340525.0 1173500.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNTStation Type:13District Number: San BeernardinoCounty:3610018025FRDS Number: TANUser ID:01S/07W-14G01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 3 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 1071CA WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.5925527Longitude: 34.0880661Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070203Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 001S007W14E001SMonloc name: USGS-340517117353001Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 2 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000140837FED USGS PERCHLORATEChemical: 5.1 UG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 626 TC5324295.2s Page A-25 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-DEC-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:27-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.3 MG/LFindings:20-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:13-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:07-OCT-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:29-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:22-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:16-SEP-14Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 3.4 UG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:08-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:02-SEP-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.1 MG/LFindings:25-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:18-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:11-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.3 MG/LFindings:04-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.8 MG/LFindings:28-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.9 MG/LFindings:21-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:14-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1200. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 627 TC5324295.2s Page A-26 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:06-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4 MG/LFindings:31-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:24-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:16-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:09-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:02-MAY-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:25-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:18-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:13-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.4 MG/LFindings:06-APR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:14-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:10-MAR-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:16-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.6 MG/LFindings:09-MAR-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.8 MG/LFindings:23-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:17-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.7 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:03-FEB-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:27-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:21-JAN-15Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:12-JAN-15Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 628 TC5324295.2s Page A-27 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:07-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:31-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:25-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:17-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:11-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:04-OCT-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:27-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:20-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:12-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:06-SEP-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:29-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:15-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:08-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:18-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:11-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUL-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:28-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:20-JUN-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:15-JUN-16Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 629 TC5324295.2s Page A-28 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:08-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:24-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.3 MG/LFindings:17-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:10-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.5 MG/LFindings:03-APR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:27-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:13-MAR-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:09-FEB-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:30-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:23-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:27-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:19-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:12-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:05-DEC-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:30-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:22-NOV-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:14-NOV-16Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 630 TC5324295.2s Page A-29 NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE + NITRITE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: VANADIUMChemical: 24. UG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 3.5 UG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.15 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 12. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 3.9 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 2.1 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 22. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 7.4 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 37. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 120. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 180. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150. MG/LFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.1Findings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 300. USFindings:22-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.1 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:05-JUN-17Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 631 TC5324295.2s Page A-30 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:14-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:05-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:27-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.6 MG/LFindings:21-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:13-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:07-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:25-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:16-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:09-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:03-JAN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:08-JAN-18Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:18-DEC-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:06-NOV-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:30-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:23-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:09-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.6 MG/LFindings:02-OCT-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:05-SEP-17Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:02-AUG-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:31-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:24-JUL-17Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS N)Chemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-17Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 632 TC5324295.2s Page A-31 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:28-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:20-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:06-AUG-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:31-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:23-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:09-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:02-JUL-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:26-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:19-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:12-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:04-JUN-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:30-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:22-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:15-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:07-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:01-MAY-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.2 MG/LFindings:24-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:16-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:09-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:02-APR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.9 MG/LFindings:27-MAR-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.7 MG/LFindings:19-MAR-12Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 633 TC5324295.2s Page A-32 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:25-FEB-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:12-FEB-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:21-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:14-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:07-JAN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:31-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.5 MG/LFindings:26-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.3 MG/LFindings:20-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:10-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:04-DEC-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:26-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.1 MG/LFindings:19-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:13-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.7 MG/LFindings:05-NOV-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:30-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:22-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:15-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:08-OCT-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:24-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:18-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:10-SEP-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:04-SEP-12Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 634 TC5324295.2s Page A-33 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:09-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:03-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:26-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:19-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:05-AUG-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:29-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:17-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:09-JUL-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:24-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:17-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:03-JUN-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:29-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:15-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:06-MAY-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:29-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.3 MG/LFindings:22-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:16-APR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:25-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:18-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.2 MG/LFindings:11-MAR-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:04-MAR-13Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 635 TC5324295.2s Page A-34 NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.4 MG/LFindings:03-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:24-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.4 MG/LFindings:18-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:10-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:03-FEB-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:27-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:20-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:13-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:06-JAN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7. MG/LFindings:23-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.8 MG/LFindings:16-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.6 MG/LFindings:09-DEC-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.5 MG/LFindings:25-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:18-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.6 MG/LFindings:12-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:04-NOV-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:21-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:14-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:08-OCT-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:30-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:23-SEP-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:16-SEP-13Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 636 TC5324295.2s Page A-35 BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 150. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 7.7Findings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 320. USFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:08-JUL-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:30-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:23-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.4 MG/LFindings:16-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:10-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:02-JUN-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.7 MG/LFindings:27-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:19-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.9 MG/LFindings:12-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:05-MAY-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 6.9 MG/LFindings:29-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:22-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:14-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.2 MG/LFindings:07-APR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5. MG/LFindings:31-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.3 MG/LFindings:24-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 5.1 MG/LFindings:17-MAR-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 4.8 MG/LFindings:10-MAR-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 637 TC5324295.2s Page A-36 Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:Not ReportedVert coord refsys: Not ReportedVertcollection method: Not ReportedVert accmeasure units: Not ReportedVertacc measure val:Not ReportedVert measure units: Not ReportedVert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.5836636Longitude: 34.0877884Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070203Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 001S007W14G001SMonloc name: USGS-340516117345801Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 4 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000140834FED USGS VANADIUMChemical: 18. UG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.29 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 12. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 4.5 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.8 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 19. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 8.2 MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 40. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 130. MG/LFindings:10-JUL-14Sample Collected: GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS Page 638 TC5324295.2s Page A-37 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%2.400 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 1 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 91730 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for SAN BERNARDINO County: 2 03491730 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON Page 639 TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Page 640 LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Page 641 OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5324295.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED Page 642 Phase I Environmental Assessment Southwest Design Group, LLC Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California June 14, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 16.6 Interview Documentation Page 643 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 No interviews were conducted due to the open and vacant nature of the property. Page 644 RGS Engineering Geology Page 8 16.8 Resume Page 645 RGS Engineering Geology Page 9 CHRISTOPHER M. KRALL P.G, C.E.G., REA POSITION: Principal Engineering Geologist EDUCATION: B.S., Geology, University of Redlands, Redlands, California, 1985 Special Studies in Environmental Waste Management, University of California, Riverside Extension Program, Cal-OSHA Safety Training Program for Hazardous Waste Workers, Trench Excavation Safety EXPERIENCE: Mr. Krall has performed numerous preliminary geotechnical investigations throughout southern California. He has conducted fault investigations along the San Andreas, San Jacinto, Elsinore-Whittier, Willard, Wildomar, Murrieta Hot Springs, Cucamonga, Casa Loma and Park Hills fault zones. Mr. Krall is experienced in percolation testing, geologic field mapping, subsurface explorations, aerial photo interpretations, seismic refraction surveys, laboratory testing and report preparations. In various localities, these studies have involved evaluation of slope stability, landslides, fault zones, seismicity, liquefaction, ground water conditions, grading requirements and other geologic conditions. Mr. Krall has served as the Project Manager for Assessment District 159 and 161 improvements in the Temecula area of Riverside County, California. Mr. Krall has gained extensive practical experience on transportation related projects through his participation in a variety of highway and road improvement projects on major San Bernardino and Riverside County Highways. He has been involved in geotechnical investigations on five major highway projects in San Bernardino and Riverside Counties including: Highway 74/Ortega Highway; Highway 178/San Bernardino County; Interstate 10/San Bernardino County; Route 91/Riverside County; and Highway 60/Riverside County. Mr. Krall is knowledgeable and experienced in working with highway operating right-of-ways, encroachment permits and lane closure procedures, in accordance with Caltrans standards. Additionally, Mr. Krall has been involved in the preparation of Materials reports following Caltrans Test 130 procedures. ASSOCIATIONS/AFFILIATIONS: Member - Inland Geologic Society Member - Geologic Society of America Member - Association of Engineering Geologist REGISTRATIONS: Registered Geologist - State of California Certified Engineering Geologist - State of California Registered Environmental Assessor - State of California Certified Concrete Technician - American Concrete Institute Page 646 Appendix ' 5RaGZay CRnstruFtiRn 1Rise 0RGelinJ 'ata Page 647 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 648 file:///P|/...%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 649 file:///P|/...%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 650 file:///P|/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Paving **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 360.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 61.7 57.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 60.1 57.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 651 file:///P|/...03.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 205.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 66.5 62.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 65.0 62.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 652 file:///P|/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 67.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 653 file:///P|/...3.00_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 72.7 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 654 file:///P|/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Demolition **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 360.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 72.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 64.5 60.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.4 68.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 655 file:///P|/...0_Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Demolition.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:24 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 205.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Concrete Saw 77.3 70.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.3 73.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 656 file:///P|/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Construction **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 360.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 360.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 360.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 360.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 360.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 360.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 63.4 55.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 56.9 52.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 62.9 55.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 60.4 56.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 62.0 58.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 67.9 64.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 67.9 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 657 file:///P|/...Arbor%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 205.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 205.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 205.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 205.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 205.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 205.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 68.3 60.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 61.7 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 67.7 60.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.3 61.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 71.7 67.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 66.9 62.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 72.7 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72.7 73.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 658 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/05/2018 Case Description: Arbor Car Wash Arch Coatings **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single-Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 360.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 60.5 56.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 205.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Page 659 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:23 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.4 61.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 660 file:///P|/...ss%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Site Preparation **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Faimly Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 661 file:///P|/...ss%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Site%20Preparation%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 662 file:///P|/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Paving **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 146.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 69.5 65.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 67.9 64.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 70.7 63.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 663 file:///P|/...or%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Paving%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 308.0 0.0 Paver No 50 77.2 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Roller No 20 80.0 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Concrete Mixer Truck 63.0 59.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 61.4 58.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 64.2 57.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 664 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Grading **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.0 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 146.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 75.7 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Page 665 file:///P|/...r%20Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Grading%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Grader No 40 85.0 308.0 0.0 Dozer No 40 81.7 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Grader 69.2 65.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 65.9 61.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 69.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 666 file:///P|/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Construction **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 146.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 146.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 146.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 146.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 146.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 146.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 71.2 63.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 75.7 72.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 71.3 68.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 68.3 64.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 69.8 65.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 64.7 60.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75.7 76.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 667 file:///P|/...Express%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Construction%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Crane No 16 80.6 308.0 0.0 All Other Equipment > 5 HP No 50 85.0 308.0 0.0 Generator No 50 80.6 308.0 0.0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 308.0 0.0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 308.0 0.0 Tractor No 40 84.0 308.0 0.0 Welder / Torch No 40 74.0 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- -- Crane 64.8 56.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A All Other Equipment > 5 HP 69.2 66.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 64.8 61.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 61.8 57.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.3 59.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.2 64.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 58.2 54.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.2 70.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 668 file:///P|/...ess%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 09/26/2018 Case Description: Hypothetical Retail Arch Coatings **** Receptor #1 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Single Family Residence Residential 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 146.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.4 64.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A **** Receptor #2 **** Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night ----------- -------- ------- ------- ----- Mulberry Ed. Center Commercial 69.7 52.2 52.2 Equipment --------- Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Usage Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device (%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) ----------- ------ ----- ----- ----- -------- --------- Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 308.0 0.0 Results ------- Noise Limits (dBA) Noise Limit Exceedance (dBA) ---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Page 669 file:///P|/...ess%20Car%20Wash_ISMND_Rancho%20Cucamonga/Technical%20Studies/Noise/RCNM%20Arch%20Coatings%20Retail.txt[11/1/2018 10:42:39 AM] Calculated (dBA) Day Evening Night Day Evening Night ---------------- -------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- Equipment Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq ---------------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ Compressor (air) 61.9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 61.9 57.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Page 670 Appendix ( 1Rise StuGy Page 671 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 672 42428 Chisolm Trail, Murrieta CA 92562 phone 760-473-1253 www.ldnconsulting.net fax 760-689-4943 10/8/18 - 1 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise October 8, 2018 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 12549 Overland Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Subject: The Arbor Carwash Facility Operational Noise Assessment in the City of Rancho Cucamonga CA Ldn Consulting is pleased to submit the following noise impact analysis for the proposed Arbors Carwash Project (project). The purpose of this assessment is to evaluate operational noise levels from the proposed car wash, and central vacuum equipment. The calculated noise levels have been propagated to the nearest potential habitat using the logarithmic relationship describing the acoustical spreading or drop off rate of 6 dB per doubling of distance from the source. The propagated noise levels are then compared to the applicable City standards. PROJECT LOCATION/DESCRIPTION The project consists of a carwash facility and is proposing a drive thru carwash building. The project site is located at 9744 Arrow Route in Rancho Cucamonga, CA. The proposed project site vicinity map is provided in Figure 1. The project site is surrounded by commercial uses to the west and across Arrow Route, a school use to the north and a residential property to the east. It should be noted: the residential property to the east is looking to rezone that property to commercial. The proposed site configuration can be seen in Figure 2. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NOISE STANDARDS Section 17.66.050 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga’s municipal code regulates exterior noise levels. The noise ordinance provides Noise Standards relative to community noise level exposure, guidelines, and regulations. Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 17.66.050(F), exterior noise levels should not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM at residential uses. The City of Rancho Cucamonga has adopted performance standards for commercial and office uses. All commercial and office uses shall not create any noise that would exceed an exterior noise level of 70 dBA when measured at the adjacent property line between the hours of 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. Page 673 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 2 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map Page 674 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 3 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Page 675 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 4 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Existing Setting Noise level measurements were conducted between the hours of 12:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. on May 9, 2018. Noise measurements were taken with a Larson Davis Model LxT Type 1 sound level meter set on “slow” response and “A-weighting.” The meter was positioned 5 feet above the existing ground elevation at all measurement locations. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after each measurement using a Larson-Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. Table 1 provides a summary of the noise level measurement and detailed measurement data is included in Attachment A. The Measurement location is shown in Figure 3. Table 1: Summary of Noise Level Measurements ID Location Description Noise Level (dBA) Leq Lmin Lmax 1 Central of site at northern property line – set back from roadways 63.4 37.1 90.8 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Proposed Carwash and Central Vacuum The applicant proposes to place a carwash along with blower fans for drying vehicles. The applicant proposes to utilize a Peco Automated Car Wash system, the manufacturer’s noise specification is provided in Attachment B. The carwash entrance and exist would be oriented from the south to the north and the blowers would be located on the northern end of the building. The blowers would be located at least 8 feet in the tunnel and would be partially blocked by the building. The blowers would be located approximately 85 feet from the property line to the north. The location of the blowers is shown in Figure 3. The applicant proposes to utilize a central vacuum unit, a VacuTech (60 HP Turbine Vacuum Producer), or equivalent, placed at the northwestern end of the building. The manufacturer’s noise specification is provided in Attachment B. The modeling includes an 8-foot high wall located around the central vacuum. The location of the central vacuum is shown in Figure 3. Proposed HVAC Rooftop mechanical ventilation units (HVAC) will be installed on the proposed buildings. In order to evaluate the HVAC noise impacts, the analysis utilized reference noise level measurements provided by Trane. The unshielded noise levels for the HVAC units was found to be 78-80 dBA as can be seen in Attachment B. Page 676 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 5 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 3 Proposed Site Configuration Page 677 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 6 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Operational Noise Modeling Noise levels from the proposed operation activities were modeled with SoundPLAN Essential, version 4.1, a three-dimensional acoustical modeling software package (NAVCON 2017). Propagation of modeled stationary noise sources was based on ISO Standard 9613-2, “Attenuation of Sound during Propagation Outdoors, Part 2: General Method of Calculation.” The model includes digital terrain modeling, which allows the calculation to take topography into account. The terrain model was developed from project specific topographical data. The ISO Standard 9613-2 assumes that all receptors would be downwind of stationary sources. This is a worst-case assumption for total noise impacts, since, in reality, only some receptors will be downwind at any one time. Typical increases or decreases of sound levels depend on the ground absorption factor between the source and receiver. Acoustically hard sites include surfaces, such as pavement, bare hard ground, water, and ice, with high reflectivity (i.e., 0.0 absorption). A higher ground factor defines more absorptive ground, such as vegetation or tilled and loose soil (typically 0.5 to 1.0). Based on field observations, portions of the site and off site uses are considered acoustically soft, or absorptive, therefore, an acoustic ground factor of 0.5 was used for modeling. The modeled source noise levels are presented in Table 2. Elevations were taken from the project plans. Table 2: Operational Reference Noise Levels (dBA) Noise Source Number of Sources Reference Sound Power Level1 Carwash Blowers 3 90.5 Central Vacuum 1 89.7 3-Ton HVAC 2 78.0 5-Ton HVAC 3 80.0 1 Reference Noise Level provided in Attachments. The results of the noise modeling at specific points are shown in Table 3. The results of the noise modeling along with the receiver locations are shown are shown in Figure 4 for the unmitigated scenario. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 4, noise levels would not exceed the City’s standards for adjacent properties. Therefore, no noise abatement measure is required to comply with City standards. Page 678 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 7 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Table 3: Operational Noise Levels (dBA) Receiver Without Mitigation R-1 60 R-2 59 R-3 42 R-4 33 R-5 37 R-6 34 R-7 43 R-8 40 FINDINGS Operational noise levels would not exceed City standards at adjacent properties with the following design features: 1. The carwash dryer system shall not to exceed 82.5 dBA unmitigated noise level at 5 feet and shall be set back within the carwash tunnel approximately eight feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. 2. All carwash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, and vacuum motor and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. 3. In order to meet daytime noise limits as defined in the Escondido Noise Ordinance, the carwash must cease operating no later than 10:00 p.m. No noise abatement measures are required or recommended. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (760) 473-1253. Sincerely, Ldn Consulting, Inc. Jeremy Louden, Principal ATTACHMENTS A – Measurement Data B – Sound Reference Data Page 679 Alan Smith Owner / Developer 42428 Chisolm Trail, 12549 Overland Drive Murrieta CA 92562 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 phone 760-473-1253 10/8/2018 - 8 - 18-47 The Arbor Carwash Noise Figure 4 Unmitigated Noise Level Contours Page 680 General Information Serial Number 21733 Model 703+ User Job Description Location Start Time Stop Time Run Time Pre Calibration Post Calibration Calibration Deviation Sample Interval Wednesday, 9 May 2018 12:00:14 Wednesday, 9 May 2018 13:30:14 01:30:00   60 Sec. Note Results Dose 4 Dose 1.3 % Projected Dose 6.9 % Leq 63.4 dBA TWA 63.4 dBA TWA (8)56.1 dBA Lmax 90.8 dBA Lpeak (max)122.8 dB SEA 125.8 dB Lmin 37.1 dBA Lep (8)56.1 dBA SE 0.0 Pa²hr Overload? Yes Statistics L10 60.0 dBA L30 56.5 dBA L50 54.5 dBA L70 53.0 dBA L90 51.0 dBA Settings Exchange Rate 3 Threshold 0 dBA Criterion Level 75 dBA Criterion Duration 8 hours RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight Unweighted Detector Slow Gain 30 dB Attachment A: Ambient Noise Levels Page 681 Measurement Results The results of all measurements, in the form of print-outs directly from the sound level meter, can be found following this report. All measurements were taken as 15-second averages. For clarity, the results of the Vs-octave band measurements are listed below. For comparison, I have included the test results from our measurements taken on your original blower ( 1 motor configuration) in 1998: · '13-0ctave Band Sound Pressure Levels, in decibels (dB) Ce~r F~Q!.l!,m~ S feel U:Qm f!lg~~~ 20 &;t f.rgm Bl12wm 5 f..eel fr.ow. 11.l,i.w~r (~ mg12r s~tem} (4 m2tsu: mtem) (l (!l.OIQ(. -1228 tU.lJ 25 76.1 70.2 67.3 31.5 76.6 71.9 71.4 40 76.8 72 .0 75 .5 50 78.4 74.2 79.3 63 77.8 72.8 85.3 80 77.3 74.8 81 .9 100 78.1 74.0 83.7 125 80.0 73.7 83.3 160 75.9 73.8 86.4 200 77.0 73.9 85.9 250 81.7 73.7 88.5 315 79.3 75 .0 90.5 400 83.6 80.5 97.0 500 76.9 73.7 96.2 630 67.0 70.8 96.5 800 67.l 63.7 89.7 1,000 66.4 64.9 88.5 1,250 64.5 64.5 84.7 1,600 65.8 63 .7 82.4 2,000 64.S 61.5 83.0 2,500 61.4 59 .4 80,3 3,150 61.S 58 .3 78.5 4,000 S9.5 56.8 76.4 5,000 57.9 54 .l 74.0 6,300 54.5 49 .9 72.5 8,000 51.3 48.8 70.6 10,000 49.6 44.S 68.9 12,500 47.2 42.2 67.1 16,000 44.9 38.4 64.3 20,000 38.9 32.8 59.9 Overall (sum): 90.5 dB 86.4 dB 103.0 dB A-Weighted: 82.5 dBA 79.4dBA 99.8 dBA. Please note that even though the data are listed to the nearest 0.1 decibel, accuracy beyond the nearest whole decibel should not be expected. Attachment B: Dryer Blowers Noise Levels Page 682 SOUND LEVEL METER READINGS MODEL: FT-DD-T460HP3 (60HP TURBINE VACUUM PRODUCER) READING ONE: 72 DB-A, 10 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING TWO: 65 DB-A, 20 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. READING THREE: 59 DB-A, 30 FEET FROM TURBINE @ 45q ANGLE AND NO BACKGROUND NOISE OR OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE. SOUND LEVEL METER USED: SIMPSON MODEL #40003 – MSHA APPROVED. MEETS OSHA & WALSH-HEALY REQUIREMENTS FOR NOISE CONTROL. CONFORMS TO ANSI S1.4-1983, IEC 651 SPECS FOR METER TYPE. NOTE: THESE READINGS WERE TAKEN OUTSIDE ON CONCRETE SLAB NO ENCLOSURE. Vacutech 1350 Hi-Tech Drive, Sheridan WY, 82801 PHONE: (800) 917-9444 FAX: (303) 675-1988 EMAIL: info@vacutechllc WEB SITE: vacutechllc.com Attachment B: Central Vacuum Noise Levels Page 683 Three Phase 4TTA3 2½ – 5 Tons Split System Cooling Product Data PUB. NO. 22-1791-14-EN Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels Page 684 © 2016 Trane 2 22-1791-14-EN Features and Benefits • All aluminum Spine Fin™ coil • WeatherGuard™ fasteners • Quick-Sess™ cabinet, service access and refrigerant connections with full coil protection • DuraTuff™ base, fast complete drain, weatherproof • Comfort “R”™ mode approved • Glossy corrosion resistant finish • Internal compressor high/low pressure and temperature protection • Liquid line filter-drier • Polyslate gray cabinet with anthracite gray badge and cap • R-410A refrigerant • Low Pressure Switch • High Pressure Switch • Compressor Sump Heat • S.E.E.T. design testing • 100% line run test • Low ambient cooling to 55°F as shipped • Low ambient cooling to 30°F with AY28X079 • Low ambient cooling to 0°F with BAYLOAM103 • Extended warranties available Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels Page 685 22-1791-14-EN 3 Contents Features and Benefits 2 General Data 4 Product Specifications 4 A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] 4 Accessory Description and Usage 5 AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions 5 Model Nomenclature 7 Electrical Data 8 Dimensions 12 Mechanical Specification Options 14 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels Page 686 4 22-1791-14-EN A-Weighted Sound Power Level [dB(A)] MODEL SOUND POWER LEVEL [dB(A)] A_WEIGHTED FULL OVTAVE SOUND POWER LEVEL dB - [dB(A)] 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 4TTA3030A3/4 78 49 60.2 66 70.3 71.4 69.8 60.4 53 4TTA3036B3/4 78 45.5 58.7 63.1 69.7 70 68.1 59 49.8 4TTA3042D3/4 79 47.5 64.5 67 75.3 74 70.7 62.2 52.8 4TTA3048D3/4 79 47.4 60 66.9 75.3 73.5 70.3 62 51.4 4TTA3060D3/4 80 47.3 55.7 69 72.7 75.8 69.4 62.2 53.3 Note: Rated in accordance with AHRI Stnadard 270-2008 General Data Product Specifications Model No. 1 4TTA3030A3 4TTA3030A4 4TTA3036B3 4TTA3036B4 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz 2 200/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 10 5 14 8 Max Fuse Size (Amps)15 15 20 15 Compressor RECIP RECIP SCROLL SCROLL RL Amps - LR Amps 7.4 - 54.9 3.7 - 28 10.4 - 73 5.8 - 38 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 0.7 0.4 0.56 0.4 Fan HP 1/8 1/8 1/8 1/8 Fan Dia (inches)23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Coil Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™ Refrigerant R-410A 5/11-LB/OZ 5/11-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ 5/12-LB/OZ Line Size - (in.) O.D. Gas 3 3/4 3/4 3/4 3/4 Line Size - (in.) O.D. Liquid 3 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec. Subcooling 10°10°10°10° Dimensions H x W x D (Crated)38 x 30.1 x 33 38 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 34 x 30.1 x 33 Weight - Shipping 224 222 176 176 Weight - Net 197 195 149 149 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: 4 Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs - Base & Cap 4" High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs - 4" Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN001 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset 5 TAYREFLN2*TAYREFLN2*TAYREFLN7*TAYREFLN7* 1 Certified in accordance with the Unitary Air-Conditioner equipment certification program which is based on AHRI Standard 210/240. 2 Calculated in accordance with N.E.C. Only use HACR circuit breakers or fuses. 3 Standard line lengths - 60'. Standard lift - 60' Suction and Liquid line. For greater lengths and lifts refer to refrigerant piping software Pub# 32-3312-0†. (†denotes latest revision) 4 For accessory description and usage, see page 5. 5 * = 15, 20, 25, 30, 40 and 50 foot lineset available. Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels Page 687 22-1791-14-EN 5 General Data AHRI Standard Capacity Rating Conditions AHRI STANDARD 210/240 RATING CONDITIONS — (A) Cooling 80°F DB, 67°F WB air entering indoor coil, 95°F DB air entering outdoor coil. (B) High Temperature Heating 47°F DB, 43°F WB air entering outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. (C) Low Temperature Heating 17°F DB, 15°F WB air entering outdoor coil, 70°F DB air entering indoor coil. (D) Rated indoor airflow for heating is the same as for cooling. AHRI STANDARD 270 RATING CONDITIONS — (Noise rating numbers are determined with the unit in cooling operation.) Standard Noise Rating number is at 95°F outdoor air. Accessory Description and Usage Anti-Short Cycle Timer — Solid state timing device that prevents compressor recycling until five (5) minutes have elapsed after satisfying call or power interruptions. Use in area with questionable power delivery, commercial applications, long lineset, etc. Evaporator Defrost Control — SPST Temperature actuated switch that cycles the condenser off as indoor coil reaches freeze-up conditions. Used for low ambient cooling to 30°F with TXV. Rubber Isolators — Five (5) large rubber donuts to isolate condensing unit from transmitting energy into mounting frame or pad. Use on any application where sound transmission needs to be minimized. Hard Start kit — Start capacitor and relay to assist compressor motor startup. Use in areas with marginal power supply, on long linesets, low ambient conditions, etc. Extreme Condition Mount Kit — Bracket kits to securely mount condensing unit to a frame or pad without removing any panels. Use in areas with high winds, or on commercial roof tops, etc. Product Specifications Model No. 1 4TTA3042D3 4TTA3042D4 4TTA3048D3 4TTA3048D4 Electrical Data V/Ph/Hz 2 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 208/230/3/60 460/3/60 Min Cir Ampacity 18 8 18 8 Max Fuse Size (Amps)30 15 30 15 Compressor SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL SCROLL RL Amps - LR Amps 13.6 - 83 6.4 - 41 13.7 - 83 6.4 - 41 Outdoor Fan FL Amps 1.2 0.6 1.2 0.6 Fan HP 1/5 1/5 1/5 1/5 Fan Dia (inches)27.6 27.6 27.6 27.6 Coil Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™Spine Fin™ Refrigerant R-410A 6/2-LB/OZ 6/2-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ 6/13-LB/OZ Line Size - (in.) O.D. Gas 3 3/4 3/4 7/8 7/8 Line Size - (in.) O.D. Liquid 3 3/8 3/8 3/8 3/8 Charge Spec. Subcooling 10°10°10°10° Dimensions H x W x D (Crated)34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 34.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 38.4 x 35.1 x 38.7 Weight - Shipping 228 228 235 235 Weight - Net 196 196 203 203 Start Components NO NO NO NO Sound Enclosure NO NO NO NO Compressor Sump Heat YES YES YES YES Optional Accessories: 4 Anti-short Cycle Timer TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A TAYASCT501A Evaporator Defrost Control AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 AY28X079 Rubber Isolator Kit BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 BAYISLT101 Snow/Sand Legs - Base & Cap 4" High BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 BAYLEGS002 Snow/Sand Legs - 4" Extension BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 BAYLEGS003 Indoor Fan Delay Kit BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 BAY24X045 Sound Enclosure BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 BAYSDEN003 Extreme Condition Mounting Kit BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 BAYECMT001 Seacoast Kit BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 BAYSEAC001 Low Ambient Kit BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 BAYLOAM103 Refrigerant Lineset 5 TAYREFLN7*TAYREFLN7*TAYREFLN3*TAYREFLN3 Attachment B: HVAC Noise Levels Page 688 Appendix ) 9iEratiRn CalFulatiRns Page 689 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 690 13603 Vibration Screening Receptors Distance (ft) 1 - Single-Family Residential (E)50 2 - Mulberry Ed. Center (N)205 Equipment PPVref D n Eref Eequip PPV Vibratory Roller 0.21 50 1.3 0.0853 Vibratory Roller 0.21 205 1.3 0.0136 Large Bulldozer 0.089 50 1.3 0.0361 Large Bulldozer 0.089 205 1.3 0.0058 Small Bulldozer 0.003 50 1.3 0.0012 Small Bulldozer 0.003 205 1.3 0.0002 Loaded Truck 0.076 50 1.3 0.0309 Loaded Truck 0.076 205 1.3 0.0049 Jackhammer 0.035 50 1.3 0.0142 Jackhammer 0.035 205 1.3 0.0023 Page 691 Appendix G 7raIIiF ,mSaFt Analysis Page 692 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 693 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 24, 2018 Prepared for: Mr. Alan Smith Southwest Design Group 12223 Highland Ave., Ste. 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 Prepared by: Scott Sato, P.E. 4225 Oceanside Blvd., 354H Oceanside, CA 92056 (760) 291-1400 TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC.TRAMES SOLUTIONS INC. (0301-0001-03) Page 694 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ............................................................................... 1 A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives B. Site Location and Study Area C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description 2. Existing Land Use 3. Proposed Land Use 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project 5. Proposed Project Opening Year 6. Proposed Project Phasing 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES ................................................................... 7 A. Level of Service Definition B. Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS ...................................................................................................... 11 A. Study Area Intersections B. Area Roadway System C. Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC ................................................................................. 15 C. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate 2. Project Trip Generation 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment 4. Other Trip Generation Factors 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 2. Method of Projection 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Page 695 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) SECTION PAGE 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 33 A. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions B. Delay and Level of Service for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions C. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions D. Delay and Level of Service for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................... 39 A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site Page 696 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE 1-A Study Area ....................................................................................................................... 3 1-B Site Plan .......................................................................................................................... 4 3-A Existing (2018) Traffic Controls and Intersection Geometrics ....................................... 12 3-B Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes ...................................................................................... 13 4-A Project Trip Distribution ................................................................................................... 17 4-B Project Only Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................... 19 4-C Cumulative Developments Location Map ...................................................................... 20 4-D DRC 2018-00119 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 22 4-E DRC 2013-00565 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 23 4-F DRC 2017-00654 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 24 4-G DRC 2016-00695 Trip Distribution ................................................................................. 25 4-H Neighboring Property Trip Distribution ........................................................................... 26 4-I Cumulative Development Only Traffic Volumes ............................................................ 27 4-J Opening Day Plus AmbieTOCnt Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Traffic Volumes ...... 28 4-K Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................... 30 4-L Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Traffic Volumes ................................................... 31 4-M Horizon Year (2040) With Project Traffic Volumes ........................................................ 32 6-A Circulation Recommendations ....................................................................................... 40 Page 697 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF TABLES TABLE PAGE 1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... ES-1 2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. ES-2 3-1 Intersection Analysis for Existing (2018) Conditions...................................................... 14 4-1 Project Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................... 16 4-2 Project Trip Generation Summary ................................................................................. 16 4-3 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Rates ......................................................... 21 4-4 Cumulative Development Trip Generation Summary ................................................... 21 5-1 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions ................................................................................................ 34 5-2 Intersection Analysis for Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions ............................................................................................. 35 5-3 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions ........................................................... 36 5-4 Intersection Analysis for Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions ................................................................ 38 Page 698 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) LIST OF APPENDICES Scoping Agreement ..................................................................................................................... 3.1 Traffic Count Worksheets ........................................................................................................... 3.2 Existing (2018) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ................................................. 3.3 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.1 Opening Day Plus Ambient Plus Cumulative Plus Project (ODACP 2019) Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.2 Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.3 Horizon Year (2040) With Project Intersection Analysis Calculation Worksheets ............................................................................ 5.4 Page 699 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed by 2019 with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip- ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37, PM-35) and a 5 internal trip reduction was assumed. The pass- by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Automated Car Wash Empirical Data 140 Feet 025 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 1 Source: Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) ES-1 Page 700 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE 2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY LAND USE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA The traffic study has been conducted in accordance with the City of Rancho Cucamonga traffic study guidelines. These guidelines include the following conditions: o Existing (2018) Traffic o Opening Day  Ambient Traffic  Cumulative (ODAC 2019) o Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative  Project (ODACP 2019) o Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions o Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions Based on the analysis conducted for the proposed project, no study area intersections were determined to have a direct significant impact due to the proposed project. Project recommendations include: x Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. x On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. x Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. ES-2 Page 701 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 1.0 INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the TIA and Study Objectives The purpose of this traffic impact analysis (TIA) is to evaluate the traffic impacts of the proposed Arbor Car Wash development. The project is proposed to be developed with an automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel. The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The traffic study will be based on the San Bernardino Association of Governments (SANBAG) Congestion Management Program and Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines criteria. Study objectives include the following: Existing (2018) Traffic. Existing traffic will be counted to determine current conditions. This constitutes the environmental setting for a CEQA analysis at the time that the hearing body reviews the project. Traffic count data shall be new or recent. In some cases, data up to one year old may be acceptable with the approval of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department. Any exception to this must be requested prior to approval of the scoping agreement Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative (ODAC 2019). Traffic conditions prior to the time that the proposed development is completed will be estimated by increasing the existing traffic counts by an appropriate growth rate to be provided by City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department staff, projected to the year that the project is estimated to be completed. Traffic generated by other cumulative projects will then be added, and the impacts on the circulation system will be analyzed. This will be the basis for determining ³no-project´ conditions. Opening Day  Ambient  Cumulative  Project (ODACP 2019). Traffic generated by the project will be added to the ³No Project´ conditions identified in Scenario 2. This scenario will identify the potential project impacts to the circulation system. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project. The Horizon Year forecasts has been developed based on applying a 2 per year growth rate (44 total growth) to the existing traffic volumes and traffic generated by other cumulative projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project. The project traffic has been added to the Horizon Year traffic volumes to determine the potential long range impacts due to the project traffic. 1 Page 702 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) B. Site Location and Study Area The site is located north of Arrow Route and east of Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Figure 1-A illustrates the site location and the traffic analysis study area. In general, the study area shall include any intersection of Collector or higher classification street with another Collector roadway or higher classification street, at which the proposed project will add 50 or more peak hour trips. Per discussion with City Staff, the study area includes the following intersections: STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. / Arrow Route. C. Development Project Identification 1. Project Size and Description The Arbor Car Wash site is proposed to be developed by 2019. The following uses are proposed as indicated below: x An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel 2. Existing Land Use The project site is currently vacant. Adjacent uses include the following: x North ±Residential x South ±Commercial x East ±Residential x West ± Vacant/Gas Station 3. Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use: Car Wash 4. Site Plan of Proposed Project Figure 1-B illustrates the conceptual land use plan. As shown in Figure 1-B, the project is proposed to have a full access driveway along Arrow Route and a reciprocal access with the adjacent gas station. 2 Page 703 3 Page 704 4 Page 705 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 5. Proposed Project Opening Year The proposed project is anticipated to be completed by 2019. Future traffic analysis has been based on a background (ambient) growth of 2 per year, along with traffic generated by other future developments in the surrounding area. 6. Proposed Project Phasing The project is expected to be completed in a single phase. Therefore, all traffic recommendations included in this report have been assumed to be completed by 2019. 5 Page 706 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT) THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK  6 Page 707 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 2.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES Traffic operations are quantified through the determination of Level of Service (LOS). Level of Service is a qualitative measure of traffic operating conditions, whereby a letter grade A through F is assigned to an infrastructure facility (intersection) representing progressively worsening traffic conditions. This section presents the LOS definition, LOS criteria and methodologies for the Intersection Operations. A. Level of Service Definition The definitions of Level of Service for uninterrupted flow (flow unrestrained by the existence of traffic control devices) are: x LOS A: Completely free-flow conditions. The operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles, and operations are constrained only by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences. Maneuverability within the traffic stream is good. Minor disruptions to flow are easily absorbed without a change in travel speed. x LOS B: Free flow conditions, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver. Minor disruptions are still easily absorbed, although local deterioration in LOS will be more obvious. x LOS C: The influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles. Minor disruptions can cause serious local deterioration in service, and queues will form behind any significant traffic disruption. x LOS D: The ability to maneuver is restricted due to traffic congestion. Travel speed is reduced by the increasing volume. Only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating. x LOS E: Operations at or near capacity, an unstable level. Vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. x LOS F: Forced or breakdown flow. It occurs either when vehicles arrive at a rate greater than the rate at which they are discharged or when the forecast demand exceeds the computed capacity of a planned facility. Although operations at these points ± and on sections immediately downstream ± appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages. 7 Page 708 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) B. City of Rancho Cucamonga Level of Service Criteria The City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan has established Level of Service (LOS) ³D´ as the target along all City maintained intersections, roads and conventional state highways. Therefore, LOS ³E´ or ³F´ is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures if the project causes significant impacts. C. Intersection Operations Analysis Methodology The City of Rancho Cucamonga requires the use of the Transportation Research Board - Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 2016 Update, or most recent release. The HCM defines level of service as a qualitative measure, which describes operational conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. The criteria used to evaluate Level of Service (LOS) conditions vary based on the type of roadway and whether the traffic flow is considered interrupted or uninterrupted. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The level of service is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The HCM methodology expresses the level of service at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. The Levels of Service results in this study are determined using the HCM methodology. For signalized intersections, average total delay per vehicle for the overall intersection is used to determine level of service. The study area intersections which are stop sign controlled with stop control on the minor street only have been analyzed using the unsignalized intersection methodology of the HCM. For these intersections, the calculation of level of service is dependent on the occurrence of gaps occurring in the traffic flow of the main street. Using data collected describing the intersection configuration and traffic volumes at the study area locations; the level of service has been calculated. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle for the worst minor street movement(s). For all way stop (AWS) controlled intersections, the ability of vehicles to enter the intersection is not controlled by the occurrence of gaps in the flow of the main street. The AWS controlled intersections have been evaluated using the HCM methodology for this type of multi-way stop controlled intersection configuration. The level of service criteria for this type of intersection analysis is based on average total delay per vehicle. 8 Page 709 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) The levels of service are defined for the various analysis methodologies as follows: LEVEL OF SERVICE AVERAGE TOTAL DELAY PER VEHICLE (SECONDS) SIGNALIZED UNSIGNALIZED A 0 to 10.00 0 to 10.00 B 10.01 to 20.00 10.01 to 15.00 C 20.01 to 35.00 15.01 to 25.00 D 35.01 to 55.00 25.01 to 35.00 E 55.01 to 80.00 35.01 to 50.00 F 80.01 and up 50.01 and up Peak hour factors (PHF), where known from existing traffic counts, have been used to assess intersection operations. 9 Page 710 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT) THIS PAGPE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK  10 Page 711 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 3.0 AREA CONDITIONS A. Study Area Intersections In general, the minimum area to be studied shall include any intersection of ³Collector´ or higher classification street, with ³Collector´ or higher classification streets, at which the proposed project could have a significant impact. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Department may require deviation from these requirements based on area conditions. Pursuant to the attached scoping agreement (see Appendix 3.1), and discussions with City of Rancho Cucamonga staff, the study area include the following intersections (shown previously on Figure 1-A): STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS 1. Archibald Ave./Arrow Route. 2. Malven Ave./Arrow Route 3. Hermosa Ave./Arrow Route. 4. Project Dwy. / Arrow Route. B. Area Roadway System Figure 3-A identifies the existing roadway conditions for study area roadways. The existing intersection traffic controls and geometrics are identified. C. Existing (2018) Traffic Volumes Existing intersection level of service calculations are based upon manual AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts made for Trames Solutions, Inc. in June 2018 while school was in session. Existing (2018) AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 3-B. The traffic count worksheets are included in Appendix 3.2. Existing average daily traffic (ADT) volumes (see Figure 3-B) for the roadway are estimated based on the following formula: PM Peak Hour Link Volume (Approach  Exit) x 12 ADT Leg Volume. D. Existing (2018) Delay and Level of Service The City of Rancho Cucamonga has established Level of Service (LOS) ³D´ as the maximum allowable threshold for the intersection operations. Therefore, LOS ³E´ or ³F´ is considered unacceptable and requires improvements measures. The results of the existing conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 3-1. The existing condition operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 3.3. As shown on Table 3-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route is currently operating at unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with the existing geometry and traffic controls. 11 Page 712 12 Page 713 13 Page 714 TABLE 3-1 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 64.9 47.5 E D 2Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 28.0 24.3 D C 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 39.6 37.2 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service Future Intersection AM PM Level of Service3 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING (2018) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Delay 3Intersection Approach Lanes 2 (secs.)WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthbound C:\TRAMES\0301-0001\Excel\0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report/3-1 14 Page 715 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 4.0 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC This section of the report quantifies the number of trips generated by the proposed project and other known developments in the area. A. Project Traffic 1. Ambient Growth Rate Some traffic volume increases on roadways can be attributed to vehicles originating outside of the study area. These types of trips either end up within the study area or pass-through onto an outside destination. Therefore, to account for these trips (termed ³ambient growth´), a growth rate can be applied to existing traffic volumes. A 2 ambient growth rate that has been used in this study to account for traffic not attributed to the project or other planned developments within the study area. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Transportation Department staff has previously reviewed and approved this rate. 2. Project Trip Generation Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is attracted and produced by a development. The trip generation for the project is based upon the specific land use which has been planned for this development. For the purpose of this analysis, the following land use assumption is evaluated: x An automated car wash facility with a 140 foot long tunnel The amount of vehicular trips generated by a project is typically determined from the trip rates included in the ITE Trip Generation manual. The latest version (10th edition) only provides the PM peak hour rate for one observation. Therefore, due to the small data set collected by ITE for an automated car wash, empirical count data has been collected at a Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) to determine the amount of peak hour and daily vehicles that occur at this facility. Trip generation rates for the proposed development are driven by the amount of cars that can be washed during the peak hour. It is our understanding that a higher number of cars can be washed as the length of the service tunnel is increased. Therefore, the peak hour and daily trip rates shown in Table 4-1 were based on tunnel length. The daily and peak hour trip generations for the proposed project are shown on Table 4-2. The proposed development is projected to generate a total of approximately 710 new trip-ends per day with 37 new vehicle trips per hour during the AM peak hour and 66 new vehicle trips per hour during the PM peak hour. It should be noted that a pass by reduction (AM-37, PM-35) and a 5 internal trip 15 Page 716 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) reduction was assumed. The pass-by reduction percentages were based on a survey conducted at the Lighting Express Car Wash (17111 Hawthorne Blvd., Lawndale, CA). TABLE 4-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE SOURCE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Automated Car Wash Empirical Data 140 Feet 0.25 0.21 0.46 0.38 0.41 0.79 8.45 1 Source: Fast 5 ;press car wash in the City of Murrieta (Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Jackson Ave.) TABLE 4-2 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY LAND USE QUANTITY PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Arbor Car Wash 140 Feet 35 29 64 53 57 111 1,183 Pass-by Reduction (AM–37%:PM–35%)1 -13 -11 -24 -19 -20 -39 -414 Internal Trip Reduction (5%) -2 -1 -3 -3 -3 -6 -59 TOTAL PROJECT TRIPS 20 17 37 31 34 66 710 1 Pass-by reduction percentages were based on surveys at Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA 3. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the project site. The project’s trip distribution patterns are based on the proximity of the project to the proposed driveway locations, the surrounding trip attractors, and the regional freeway interchanges. The trip distribution pattern for the project is illustrated on Figure 4-A. 4. Other Trip Generation Factors The project land use is comprised of primary, pass-by and internal traffic. Primary traffic refers to trips that are intending to go to the project as their primary destination. Pass-by traffic consists of vehicles that stop at the site on their way to a primary destination. Internal traffic consists of trips that are anticipated to occur between the future gas station and those that go to the project. A 5 reduction in traffic has been assumed for these trips. 16 Page 717 17 Page 718 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) Pass-by reductions have been based on the surveys conducted at the Lightning Express Car Wash, 17111 Hawthorne Blvd, Lawndale, CA during the AM and PM peak hours. Based on the surveys, a pass-by rate of 37 and 35 were observed for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Appendix 3.1 contains the survey sheets. 5. Project Peak Hour Turning Movement Traffic The assignment of traffic from the site to the adjoining roadway system has been based upon the site s trip generation, trip distribution, proposed arterial highway and local street systems, which would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the site. Based on the identified project traffic generation and distribution, Project traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-B. B. Cumulative Traffic (Background) 4. Method of Projection To assess Opening Day Plus ambient plus cumulative plus project traffic conditions, project traffic is combined with existing traffic, area-wide growth and other future developments which are approved or being processed concurrently in the study area. Developments which are being processed concurrently in the study area have been provided by the City of Rancho Cucamonga staff. 2. Other Approved or Proposed Development Projects The locations of the cumulative projects provided by the City are shown on Figure 4-C and include the following projects: x DRC 20118-000119 (9000 Hellman Ave.) ± 174,745 sf Industrial Warehouse x DRC 2013-00565 (NE of Archibald/7th) ± 171,941 General Industrial x DRC 2017-00654 (SW of Haven/26th) ± 207 MFDU/14,300 sf Retail x DRC 2016-00695 (8th/Industrial) ± 150,003 sf General Industrial 3. Other Approved Projects Trip Generation Table 4-3 presents the cumulative development trip generation rates and anticipated cumulative traffic volumes. Table 4-4 indicates that the cumulative developments are projected to generate a total of approximately 4,822 trips per day with 465 trip ends per hour during the AM peak hour and 504 trip ends per hour during the PM peak hour. 18 Page 719 19 Page 720 20 Page 721 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) TABLE 4-3 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION RATES LAND USE ITE CODE QUANTITY2 PEAK HOUR TRIP RATES1 DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL General Light Industrial 110 Varies TSF 0.62 0.08 0.70 0.08 0.55 0.63 4.96 Multifamily (Low Rise) 220 207 DU 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 General Office Bldg. 710 1.625 TSF 1.36 0.19 1.55 0.25 1.24 1.49 11.03 Shopping Center 820 Varies TSF 0.61 0.39 1.00 1.83 1.90 3.73 42.94 1 Source: ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units TABLE 4-4 CUMULATIVE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY MAP ID PROJECT NAME LAND USE QUANTITY 1 PEAK HOUR DAILY AM PM IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL 1 Overton Moore Properties (DRC 2018-00119) Gen. Lt. Industrial 174.745 TSF 108 14 122 14 96 110 867 2 SCHEU Management Corp (DRC 2013-00565) Gen. Lt. Industrial 171.941 TSF 107 14 121 14 95 109 853 3 Charles Joseph Assoc. (DRC 2017-00654) Multifamily Housing 207 DU 23 72 95 72 43 115 1,515 Shopping Center 14.3 TSF 9 6 15 26 27 53 614 Pass-by (25% Retail) -2 -2 -4 -7 -6 -13 -154 Subtotal 30 76 106 91 64 155 1,975 4 Rancho Cucamonga Prop. (DRC 2016- 00695) Gen. Lt. Industrial 150.003 TSF 93 12 105 12 83 95 744 5 Neighboring Property (east of project site) Gen. Office Bldg. 1.625 TSF 2 1 3 1 2 3 18 Shopping Center 8.5 TSF 5 3 8 16 16 32 365 Subtotal 7 4 11 17 18 35 383 Total Cumulative Projects Trip Generation 345 120 465 148 356 504 4,822 1 TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Units 4. Other Approved Development Trip Distribution and Assignments Figures 4-D through 4-H contains the directional distribution and assignment of the cumulative development traffic. 5. Total Background Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes Based on the identified trip distribution for the cumulative development on arterial highways throughout the study area, cumulative development traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-I. Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-J. 21 Page 722 22 Page 723 23 Page 724 24 Page 725 25 Page 726 26 Page 727 27 Page 728 28 Page 729 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) Opening Day plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) traffic volumes are shown on Figure 4-K. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Traffic Volumes are shown on Figure 4-L. The Horizon Year forecasts were based on applying a 2 per year growth rate to the existing traffic volumes and additional traffic from previously identified cumulative development projects. Horizon Year (2040) With Project AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 4-M. These forecasts were based on the adding the project traffic to the Horizon Year without Project traffic forecasts. 29 Page 730 30 Page 731 31 Page 732 32 Page 733 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 5.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Peak hour intersection analysis has been performed at the study area intersections for ODAC of the project scenarios and for projected future conditions. Improvements are recommended to satisfy the level of service requirements of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and if the following impacts are identified: 1) Any study intersection that is operating at LOS ³A´, ³B´, ³C´ or ³D´ for any study scenario without project traffic in which the addition of project traffic causes the intersection to degrade to a LOS ³E´ or ³F´ shall mitigate the impact to bring the intersection back to as least LOS ³D´ . 2) Any study intersection that is operating at a LOS ³E´ or ³F´ for any study scenario without project traffic shall mitigate any impacts so as to bring the intersection back to the overall level of delay established prior to project traffic being added.. A. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative (ODAC 2019) Conditions The results of the ODAC conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-1. The ODAC conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.1. As shown on Table 5-1, the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is projected to continue to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn at the Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route intersection is improve intersection delay to acceptable level of service (LOS ³D´ or better). B. Opening Day Plus Ambient plus Cumulative plus Project (ODACP 2019) Conditions The results of the ODACP conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-2. The ODACP conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.2. As shown on Table 5-4, no new intersections are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse), in addition to the deficient intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route as previously identified under Existing and ODAC 2019 conditions, with existing geometry and traffic controls. The separate southbound right turn improvement identified under ODAC conditions for the intersection of Archibald Avenue/Arrow Route is anticipated to improve intersection LOS to acceptable level of service (LOS ³D´ or better). C. Horizon Year (2040) Without Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-3. The Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.3. As shown on Table 5-3, the following 33 Page 734 TABLE 5-1 Traffic Control 1 L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM 1 Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 12d12012012070.6 52.8 E D - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012054.2 51.4 D D 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 01000002012030.6 26.3 D D 3 Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 12011112012039.8 38.7 D D 4 Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service Future Intersection Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE (2019) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-1 34 Page 735 TABLE 5-2 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 71.3 53.9 E D - With Improvements TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012054.752.5D D 2Malven Ave./ Arrow Route CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 31.5 27.9 D D 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 40.1 39.5 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route CSS 00001 00.51.50 0 2 023.730.3 C D 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane; 1 = Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR OPENING DAY PLUS AMBIENT PLUS CUMULATIVE PLUS POJECT (2019) CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-2 35 Page 736 TABLE 5-3 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 119.6 116.6 F F - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012094.3 107.8 F F 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route4,5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 37.9 57.3 E F 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 51.6 52.6 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route ----- 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach (northbound left tun movement) is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. Future Intersection Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORI=ON YEAR (2040) WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-3 36 Page 737 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) study intersections are projected to operate an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the peak hours with the existing geometry and traffic controls: x Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) x Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2) For the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-3 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. D. Horizon Year (2040) With Project Conditions The results of the Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions intersection analysis are summarized in Table 5-4. The Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions operations analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.4. As shown on Table 5-4, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse), in addition to the deficient intersections previously identified under Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions. Similar to Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersections of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2), improvements in addition to the ones identified in Table 5-4 are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. For the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (3) intersection, restricting the driveway to a right- in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. 37 Page 738 TABLE 5-4 Traffic Control 1 LTRLTRLTRLTRAMPM 1Archibald Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 d 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 120.2 118.2 F F - With Improvements4 TS 1 2 d 1 2 1 12012095.4 114.9 F F 2 Malven Ave./ Arrow Route4,5 CSS 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 0 39.7 62.8 E F 3Hermosa Ave./ Arrow Route TS 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 1 2 0 52.3 53.3 D D 4Project Driveway / Arrow Route CSS 00001 00.51.50 0 2 0 48.8 46.8 E E - With RIRO/LI Access6 CSS 000001 0.5 1.5 0 0 2 0 17.9 17.2 C C 1 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross Street Stop 2 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; d = Defacto right turn lane; 1 = Improvement 3 Delay and level of service calculated using the following analysis software: Synchro 10 HCM6 BOLD = Unacceptable level of service 4 Additional Improvements are not feasible 5 The minor approach (northbound left tun movement) is projected to exerience the worse delay and will not impede the flow of traffic on the Arrow Route. 6 RIRO/LI = Right-In / Right-Out / Left-In Only Driveway INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR HORI=ON YEAR (2040) WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS ID Intersection Intersection Approach Lanes 2 Delay 3 Level of Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.)Service3 AM PM C:?TRAMES?0301-0001?Excel?0301-0001-01 -Arbor Car Wash Report.xlsx/5-4 38 Page 739 ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAMES SOLUTIONS, INC. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA (0301-0001-03_ARBOR CAR WASH TRAFFIC STUDY REPORT.DOC;) 6.0 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Traffic Impacts and Level of Service Analysis For Existing (2018), ODAC (2019), and ODACP (2019), the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) is operating at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the AM peak hour with existing geometry and traffic controls. Providing a separate southbound right turn lane is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. For Horizon Year (2040) Without Project conditions, the intersection of Archibald Avenue / Arrow Route (1) and Malven Avenue / Arrow Route (2) are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service (LOS ³E´ or worse) during the peak hours. Further improvements in addition to the improvements previously identified under ODAC (2019) conditions are not feasible due to existing adjacent developments. Therefore, these intersections are anticipated to continue to operate at LOS ³E´ or worse. For Horizon Year (2040) With Project conditions, the Project Driveway / Arrow Route (4) intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable level of service. Restricting the Project driveway to a right-in/right-out/left-in (RIRO/LI) only access (no left-out) is anticipated to improve the intersection LOS to acceptable conditions. B. Circulation Recommendations 1. On-Site Figure 6-A illustrates the on-site recommended roadway and intersection lane improvements. Construction of on-site improvements shall occur in conjunction with adjacent project development activity or as needed for project access purposes. The recommended on-site roadway improvements are described below. x Provide stop sign control at the project driveways. x On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the project. x Verify that minimum sight distance is provided at the project driveways. 39 Page 740 40 Page 741 Appendix H ,nIiltratiRn 7estinJ 5eSRrt Page 742 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 743 RGS Engineering Geology 1225 Chestnut Street Upland, California 91784 ckrall@aol.com (951) 315-3517   Geologic Evaluation Fault/Seismic Studies Environmental Assessments Infiltration Testing   September 12, 2018 Allan Smith Southwest Design Group, LLC 12223 Highland Avenue, Suite 106-201 Rancho Cucamonga, California 91739 SUBJECT: REPORT OF INFILTRATION TESTING Proposed Arbor Carwash 9744 Arrow Route Rancho Cucamonga, California Project No. 1702-01 Mr. Smith: In accordance with your authorization, we have conducted infiltration testing for low impact development (LID) design associated with the proposed site improvements. Our test procedures and content of this report conform to the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our findings, conclusions, and recommendations related to site infiltration are presented herein. We greatly appreciate this opportunity to be of service. Should you have any questions, or require additional services, please call our office. Respectfully submitted, RGS Engineering Geology ________________________________ Christopher Krall, P.G. 5717, E.G. 1816 Engineering Geologist Page 744 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 2 INTRODUCTION Accompanying Map, Illustrations, And Appendices Figure 1 - Site Location Map Figure 2 - Infiltration Test Location Plan Appendix A - References Appendix B - Exploratory Trench Logs Appendix C - Infiltration Test Data Scope of Work For the purpose of this study RGS conducted the following scope or work in accordance with written authorization: x Review related geologic and soils information available in our files. x Excavate, log, and backfill two deep exploratory trenches on-site to evaluate the underlying soil condition to a maximum depth of 15 feet. x Excavate a total of two shallow test pits to a depth near the bottom of the proposed basin for infiltration testing. x Prepare each test pit for infiltration testing. x Conduct two field infiltration tests to determine the representative rate to be used for storm water mitigation design. Testing utilized the Riverside County percolation test method in conformance with the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Documents for Water Quality Management. x Preparation of this report presenting our findings, conclusions, and geologic recommendations for storm water basin design. Purpose and Objective The purpose and objective of testing is to determine the rate of storm water infiltration for native sediments exposed along the bottom of proposed retention basins associated with site improvements at the proposed Arbor Carwash Express in Rancho Cuca Monga, California. Best management practices utilize drawdown time based on infiltration rate combined with the interaction of chemical, physical, and biological processes between soil, organic matter, and water to filter out sediments and constituents from surface run- off and storm water. Accordingly, best management practices require a maximum Page 745 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 3 drawdown time to provide proper filtration and avoid nuisance issues. Since drawdown time is contingent on the infiltration rate of the underlying soil, tests are used to help establish the vertical infiltration rate of the soil below a proposed infiltration facility. The test methods attempt to simulate the physical processes and seasonal variance that will occur when the facility is in operation. The established infiltration rate combined with calculated storm water flow is then used by the project engineer to design the low impact development best management practice for water quality suited to the particular project. Site Conditions and Location The site is located along the north side of Arrow Route just east of Archibald Avenue in the city of Rancho Cucamonga, California. The geographical relationship of the site and surrounding area is shown on our Site Location Map, Figure 1. Most of the site is currently vacant with a small residence located near the center of the property. Access for infiltration testing was limited due to the existence of the home. However, the soil conditions in the area tested are considered representative of the infiltration basin and the site as a whole based on the local geology. Topography in the area of the proposed improvements is generally flat with a gradient of less than 2 percent toward the south-southwest. The area is void of shrubs or trees with only a sparse growth of seasonal weeds and grasses observed. Proposed Development The proposed site improvements include an express carwash with associated landscaping, hardscape, and buildings. Low impact design for storm water quality includes a water run-off retention basin near the south-central portion of the site. The proposed improvements and low impact development facilities are shown on depicted on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SITE EVALUATION AND TESTING Subsurface Evaluation To evaluate the subsurface conditions below the proposed retention basin and infiltration trench, two exploratory trench excavations (one at each infiltration facility) were conducted using Case 580 M rubber tired backhoe equipped with a 24 inch wide bucket to a depth of at least 10 feet below the proposed basin or trench invert. The number of exploratory excavations was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Each excavation was carefully monitored by our state licensed Engineering Geologist, Christopher Krall, who prepared a log of the soil column, encountered and collected representative soil samples for field classification as warranted. Geologic conditions Page 746 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 4 related to infiltration such as soil texture, density, and moisture content was recorded. Soil color and mottling or staining and groundwater occurrence were also noted. A copy of the exploratory trench logs is provided in Append B of this report for review. The exploratory trenches were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. Infiltration Test Method Our field test method for infiltration was conducted in conformance with Appendix A of the Riverside County Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Our test method followed the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. This test measures the length of time required for a quantity of water to infiltrate into the soil and is often called a ³percolation rate´. It should be noted that the percolation rate is related to, but not equal to, the infiltration rate. While an infiltration rate is a measure of the speed at which water progresses downward into the soil, the percolation rate measures not only the downward progression but the lateral progression through the soil as well. This reflects the fact that the surface area for infiltration testing would include only the horizontal surface while the percolation test includes both the bottom surface area and the sidewalls of the test hole. However, there is a relationship between the values obtained by a percolation test and infiltration rate expressed by the following equation known as the Porchet Method of converting percolation rate to infiltration rate. It ǻH (60r) ǻt (r2Havg) Where: I t tested infiltration rate (inches/hour) ǻH change in head over the time interval, inches ǻt time interval, minutes r effective radius of test hole H avg average head over the time interval, inches Test Preparation and Procedure Test pits were excavated at each proposed infiltration facilities (two for the proposed basin and two for the proposed trench) to a depth of two to three feet below the exiting ground surface to replicate the bottom of the infiltration facility. The number of test pits was dictated by Table 1 of Appendix A of the design handbook. Along the bottom of each test pit a test hole was excavated to a depth of 22 to 24 inches with a diameter of approximately 8 inches. A six inch diameter perforated plastic pipe and 2 inches of gravel was placed in each test hole to prevent scouring or erosion. Page 747 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 5 A water container was inverted over each test hole and 5 gallons of clean water was allowed to soak into the soil prior to testing. Pre-soaking of the test holes was performed to emulate possible saturated conditions during seasonal storms. Where pre-soaking of the test holes was complete in a timely manner, testing was conducted immediately following the pre-soak. Where pre-soaking was slower, testing was conducted the following day. Under no circumstance was presoaking allowed to continue for more than 26 hours. Following the presoak, test holes were filled with clear water to a height of 20 inches (5 times the test-hole radius) and the time required for the water to seep into the soil was recorded. All measurements were taken from a fixed reference point using a ruler placed within the test hole and are accurate to 0.25 inches. When 2 consecutive measurements indicated that 6 inches of water seeps into the soil in less than 25 minutes, the strata was classified as ³sandy soil´ and testing continued for an additional hour with measurements taken every 10 minutes. The drop that occurs during the final 10 minutes was used to calculate the field percolation rate. In non-sandy material at least twelve measurements were recorded over a period of at least six hours at approximately 30 minutes intervals. The final reading was used to calculate the field percolation rate. The test pits were backfilled immediately following field recordation for safety. At the completion of testing, a 3 feet long surveyor’s stake (lath), flagged with highly visible banner tape was placed in the location of the test indicating date, test hole number, and the company performing the test. The approximate location of each test pit is shown on our Infiltration Test Location Plan, Figure 2. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND TEST RESULTS Earth Material The earth material underlying the infiltration areas is summarized below. Detailed descriptions of the soil characteristics are provided on our exploratory trench logs, Appendix B. In summary the subsurface conditions below each proposed infiltration areas are similar and expose silty sand (Unified Soil Classification ± SM) that is yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, medium dense, non-cohesive, moderately graded, with a slight blocky soil structure. Soil stratigraphy is generally consistent to a depth of 15 feet or more. Groundwater Occurrence Groundwater was encountered in both of our exploratory trench excavation at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface corresponding to a depth of more than 10 feet below the proposed infiltration invert. Page 748 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 6 In general, groundwater does not occur in this area within 100 to 200 feet of the ground surface and groundwater is not expected to impact this development. Test Results Our field test data is presented in Appendix C for review and summarized in Table I below. The percolation rate of the earth material underlying the infiltration areas yields good percolation rates ranging from 1.12 to 1.16 minutes per inch. These values were converted to infiltration rate following the Porchet Method equation as explained in the previous section of this report. TABLE 1 7DEXlDWeG 3erFolDWion,nIilWrDWion 7eVW ReVXlWV Test No. Location Interval Tested (inches) Earth Materials Perc. Rate (min/inch) Infilt. Rate (inch/hour) P-1 ^ĞĞ WůĂŶ 34´-54´ Silty Sand (SM) 1.12 6.91 P-2 ^ĞĞ WůĂŶ 37´-57´ Silty Sand (SM) 1.16 6.75     CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conclusions x Based on our investigation, the areas of proposed infiltration are underlain by silty sand (SM) that is considered permeable with moderate to good percolation rates to a depth of 15 feet below the ground surface. x Groundwater was not encountered in each exploratory trench at a depth of approximately 15 feet below the ground surface. Groundwater is not expected to impact the development or infiltration process. x A field infiltration rate of 6.75 inches per hour is considered representative of the underlying native soil and should be considered the standard for design of the low impact development system. x Considering the location and geologic setting of the site, installation of the proposed LID BMP will not create adverse effects to slope stability, soil erosion, off-site impacts. Page 749 Report of Infiltration Testing Mr. Alan Smith Arbor Carwash Project No. 1702-01 Rancho Cucamonga, California September 12, 2018 RGS Engineering Geology Page 7 Recommendations x The low impact development system should be designed by the project engineer considering the geologic information and field infiltration rate contained in this report. x All required setbacks as set forth in the design handbook should be adhered to during site planning, design, and construction. x To account for long term performance variables of full scale working infiltration facilities due to accumulation of fine particles, post construction compaction of native soil, non-homogeneous soil strata, and site variations, a safety factor of 3 should be applied to the infiltration rate for design purposes. x Future building expansion or other improvements in the area of the infiltration system, including hardscape, flatwork sidewalks or paving, and water wells, should be reviewed by this firm and approved by the local governing agency. CLOSURE It is the owner s responsibility to insure that proper design and construction methods of the infiltration LID system are employed. Improper placement or construction of the system can cause premature failure regardless of the soil conditions. It is also the owner s responsibility to adequately maintain this infiltration system to extend its longevity and performance. Please understand that this investigation was limited to the evaluation and feasibility of soil infiltration rates and has not included a comprehensive analysis of the stability of the proposed development from a geotechnical standpoint. Page 750 Page 751 Page 752 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX A References Page 753 RGS Engineering Geology REFERENCES Carson, Scott E. and Matti, Jonathan C., 1985, Contour Map Showing Minimum Depth to Groundwater, Upper Santa Ana River Valley, California, 1973-1979, U.S. Geological Survey, Map MF-1802 Franks, Alvin, l., 1972, ³Geology for Individual Sewage Disposal Systems,´ in California Geology, Volume 25, Number 9, September 1972, pp. 195-203 Heath, Ralph C., 1987, ³Basic Groundwater Hydrology´, United States Geological Survey Water- Supply Paper 2220, Fourth Printing; Kaplan, Benjamin O., 1988, ³Septic Systems Handbook´, Lewis Publishers, Second Printing 1988, 283 pp. Riverside County Flood Control District, 2001, Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices, Revised September 2011. San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans and Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Page 754 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX B Exploratory Trench Logs Page 755 EXPLORATORY TRENCH LOG 352-(&7 1$0( $UERU &DUZDVK (/(9$7,21 BBB1$BBBBBBBBB 75(1&+ 12 BB7BBBB 352-(&7 1R BBBBBBBBB (48,30(17 BB&$6( BBBBBBB '(37+ )((7 7<3( 2) 7(67 6$03/( '(37+ '5< '(16,7< 3&) 02,6785( &217(17  86&6 62,/ &/$66,),&$7,21 ($57+ 0$7(5,$/ GE27E&+1,&$/ 'ES&R,37,21 /2GGE' %< &. '$7E 61318 _______ S$03/E' %< _______&._________  Alluvium (Qal) NG 94.1 3.6 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): BULK Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 105.2 4.8 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive,  Slight blocky structure      Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG 7UHQG 6FDOH   7(67 6<0%2/6 %  %8/. 6$03/( 5  5,1* 6$03/( 6&  6$1'&21( 0'  0$;,080 '(16,7< *6  *5$,1 6,=( 6(  6$1' (48,9$/(17 1*  18&/($5 *$8*(   5(/$7,9( &203$&7,21 Page 756 EXPLORATORY TRENCH LOG 352-(&7 1$0( $UERU &DUZDVK (/(9$7,21 BBB1$BBBBBBBBB 75(1&+ 12 BB7BBBB 352-(&7 1R BBBBBBBBB (48,30(17 BB&$6( BBBBBBB '(37+ )((7 7<3( 2) 7(67 6$03/( '(37+ '5< '(16,7< 3&) 02,6785( &217(17  86&6 62,/ &/$66,),&$7,21 ($57+ 0$7(5,$/ GE27E&+1,&$/ 'ES&R,37,21 /2GGE' %< &. '$7E 61318 _______ S$03/E' %< _______&._________  Alluvium (Qal) NG 93.8 3.9 SM Qal SILTY SAND (SM): Yellow brown, fine to coarse grained, dry to damp, NG 107.4 5.1 Medium dense, moderately graded, non-cohesive,  Slight blocky structure      Total depth 15 ft No Groundwater Trench Backfilled GRAPHIC LOG 7UHQG 6FDOH   7(67 6<0%2/6 %  %8/. 6$03/( 5  5,1* 6$03/( 6&  6$1'&21( 0'  0$;,080 '(16,7< *6  *5$,1 6,=( 6(  6$1' (48,9$/(17 1*  18&/($5 *$8*(   5(/$7,9( &203$&7,21 Page 757 RGS Engineering Geology APPENDIX C Infiltration Test Data Page 758 WƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ WƌŽũĞĐƚ EŽ͗ ĂƚĞ͗ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ EŽ͗ /Ͳϭ dĞƐƚĞĚ LJ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ;dͿ͗ϮϬΗͲϯϮΗ h^^ ^Žŝů ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ϰ ϮϬ dƌŝĂů EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶŝƚŝĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ &ŝŶĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ϭ ϲ͗ϭϱ ϲ͗ϯϬ ϭϱ ϭϬ Ϯ ϴ Ϯ ϲ͗ϯϬ ϲ͗ϰϱ ϭϱ ϭϬ Ϯ ϴ ZĞĂĚŝŶŐ  EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ ;ȴƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ŽͿ /ŶŝƚŝĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;&Ϳ &ŝŶĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ȴ,Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ  ,ĞĂĚ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ WĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶ  ZĂƚĞ  ;ŵŝŶͬ͘ŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĂƚĞ  ;ŝŶͬ͘Śƌ͘Ϳ ϭ ϭϭ͗ϱϱ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ Ϯ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ ϯ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϰ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘Ϯ ϴ͘ϴ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϲ͘ϴϲ ϲ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϮ͗ϱϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗ WZK>d/KE d^d d ^,d ^Ez ^K/> Z/dZ/ d^dΎ Ύ/Ĩ ƚǁŽ ĐŽŶƐĞĐƵƚŝǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌŵĞŶƚƐ ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞ ƚŚĂƚ ϲ ŝŶĐŚĞƐ ŽĨ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƐĞĞƉƐ ŝŶƚŽ ƐŽŝů ŝŶ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ Ϯϱ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƚĞƐƚ  ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ƌƵŶ ĨŽƌ ĂŶ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƌ ǁŝƚŚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƚĂŬĞŶ ĞǀĞƌLJ ϭϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘  KƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ ƚĞƐƚ ŚŽůĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƉƌĞͲƐŽĂŬĞĚ  ŽǀĞƌŶŝŐŚƚ ĂŶĚ Ăƚ ůĞĂƐƚ ƚǁůĞǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ϲ ŚŽƵƌ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϯϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐͿ͘  džĐĞů dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ϭϲϱϯͲϬϭ ^ŝůƚLJ ^ĂŶĚ ;^DͿ ϭϭͬϭϲͬϮϬϭϲ 'ƌĞĂƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ Žƌ ƋƵĂů ƚŽ ϲΗ  ;LJͬŶͿ zĞƐ zĞƐ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ ;ŝŶĐŚĞƐͿ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ŚƌŝƐƚŽƉŚĞƌ <ƌĂůů Page 759 WƌŽũĞĐƚ͗ WƌŽũĞĐƚ EŽ͗ ĂƚĞ͗ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ EŽ͗ WͲϮ dĞƐƚĞĚ LJ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ;dͿ͗ϮϬΗͲϯϮΗ h^^ ^Žŝů ůĂƐƐŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͗ ϰ ϮϬ dƌŝĂů EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶŝƚŝĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ &ŝŶĂů ĞƉƚŚ  ƚŽ tĂƚĞƌ  ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ϭ ϳ͗Ϭϱ ϳ͗ϭϯ ϴ ϯ ϵ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ ϳ͗ϭϰ ϳ͗Ϯϯ ϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϯ ϲ͘Ϭϱ ZĞĂĚŝŶŐ  EŽ͘ ^ƚĂƌƚ ;ƚͿ ^ƚŽƉ ;ƚͿ ;ȴƚͿ dŝŵĞ  /ŶƚĞƌǀĂů  ;ŵŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ŽͿ /ŶŝƚŝĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;&Ϳ &ŝŶĂů  ĞƉƚŚ ƚŽ  tĂƚĞƌ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ;ȴ,Ϳ tĂƚĞƌ  ,ĞĂĚ >ĞǀĞů  ŚĂŶŐĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ WĞƌĐŽůĂƚŝŽŶ  ZĂƚĞ  ;ŵŝŶͬ͘ŝŶ͘Ϳ /ŶĨŝůƚƌĂƚŝŽŶ ZĂƚĞ  ;ŝŶͬ͘Śƌ͘Ϳ ϭ ϭϭ͗ϱϱ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ ϵ ϭ͘ϭϭ ϲ͘ϵϳ Ϯ ϭϮ͗Ϭϱ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϭ ϴ͘ϵ ϭ͘ϭϮ ϲ͘ϵϭ ϯ ϭϮ͗ϭϱ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘Ϯ ϴ͘ϴ ϭ͘ϭϰ ϲ͘ϴϲ ϰ ϭϮ͗Ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϯ ϴ͘ϳ ϭ͘ϭϱ ϲ͘ϴϬ ϱ ϭϮ͗ϯϱ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϰ ϴ͘ϲ ϭ͘ϭϲ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϲ ϭϮ͗ϰϱ ϭϮ͗ϱϱ ϭϬ ϭϭ Ϯ͘ϰ ϴ͘ϲ ϭ͘ϭϲ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϭϬ ϭϭ ϭϮ WZK>d/KE d^d d ^,d ^Ez ^K/> Z/dZ/ d^dΎ Ύ/Ĩ ƚǁŽ ĐŽŶƐĞĐƵƚŝǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌŵĞŶƚƐ ĚĞŵŽŶƐƚƌĂƚĞ ƚŚĂƚ ϲ ŝŶĐŚĞƐ ŽĨ ǁĂƚĞƌ ƐĞĞƉƐ ŝŶƚŽ ƐŽŝů ŝŶ ůĞƐƐ ƚŚĂŶ Ϯϱ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͕ ƚŚĞ ƚĞƐƚ  ƐŚĂůů ďĞ ƌƵŶ ĨŽƌ ĂŶ ĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů ŚŽƵƌ ǁŝƚŚ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ƚĂŬĞŶ ĞǀĞƌLJ ϭϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘  KƚŚĞƌǁŝƐĞ͕ ƚĞƐƚ ŚŽůĞƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƉƌĞͲƐŽĂŬĞĚ  ŽǀĞƌŶŝŐŚƚ ĂŶĚ Ăƚ ůĞĂƐƚ ƚǁůĞǀĞ ŵĞĂƐƵƌĞŵĞŶƚƐ ǁĞƌĞ ƌĞĐŽƌĚĞĚ ŽǀĞƌ Ă ϲ ŚŽƵƌ ƉĞƌŝŽĚ ;ĂƉƉƌŽdžŝŵĂƚĞůLJ ϯϬ ŵŝŶƵƚĞ ŝŶƚĞƌǀĂůƐͿ͘  džĐĞů dƌĂŶƐƉŽƌƚ ϭϲϱϯͲϬϭ ^ŝůƚLJ ^ĂŶĚ ;^DͿ ϭϭͬϭϲͬϮϬϭϲ 'ƌĞĂƚĞƌ ƚŚĂŶ Žƌ ƋƵĂů ƚŽ ϲΗ  ;LJͬŶͿ zĞƐ zĞƐ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ZĂĚŝƵƐ ;ŝŶĐŚĞƐͿ͗ ĞƉƚŚ ŽĨ dĞƐƚ ,ŽůĞ ;ŝŶ͘Ϳ ŚƌŝƐƚŽƉŚĞƌ <ƌĂůů ŽŵŵĞŶƚƐ͗ Page 760 City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project State Clearinghouse No. N/A June 15, 2020 Page 761 This document is designed for double-sided printing to conserve natural resources. Page 762 Arbor Express Car Wash 1 June 8, 2020 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) identifies Mitigation Measures incorporated into the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Arbor Express Car Wash Project (Project). For each Mitigation Measure, the MMRP identifies the significant impact, the related mitigation measure, the implementation entity, the monitoring and verification entity, and timing requirements. Page 763 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 2 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Page 764 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 3 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potential Impacts on Migratory Nesting Birds. BIO-1: Pre-Construction Nesting Bird Survey. If vegetation removal is scheduled during the nesting season (typically February 1 to September 1), then a focused survey for active nests shall be conducted by a qualified biologist (as determined by a combination of academic training and professional experience in biological sciences and related resource management activities) no more than five (5) days prior to the beginning of project-related activities (including but not limited to equipment mobilization and staging, clearing, grubbing, vegetation removal, and grading). Surveys shall be conducted in proposed work areas, staging and storage areas, and soil, equipment, and material stockpile areas. For passerines and small raptors, surveys shall be conducted within a 250-foot radius surrounding the work area (in areas where access is feasible). For larger raptors, such as those from the genus Buteo, the survey area shall encompass a 500- foot radius. Surveys shall be conducted during weather conditions suited to maximize the observation of possible nests and shall concentrate on areas of suitable habitat. If a lapse in project-related work of five (5) days or longer occurs, an additional nest survey shall be required before work can be reinitiated. If nests are encountered during any preconstruction survey, a qualified biologist shall determine if it may be Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to vegetation removal. Page 765 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date feasible for construction to continue as planned without impacting the success of the nest, depending on conditions specific to each nest and the relative location and rate of construction activities. If the qualified biologist determines construction activities have potential to adversely affect a nest, the biologist shall immediately inform the construction manager to halt construction activities within minimum exclusion buffer of 50 feet for songbird nests, and 200 to 500 feet for raptor nests, depending on species and location. Active nest(s) within the Project Site shall be monitored by a qualified biologist during construction if work is occurring directly adjacent to the established no-work buffer. Construction activities within the no-work buffer may proceed after a qualified biologist determines the nest is no longer active due to natural causes (e.g. young have fledged, predation, or other non- anthropogenic nest failure). CULTURAL RESOURCS Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. SMBMI-1: In the event that pre-contact cultural resources are discovered during project activities, all work in the immediate vicinity of the find (within a 60-foot buffer) shall cease and a qualified archaeologist meeting Secretary of Interior standards shall be hired to assess the find. Work on the other portions of the project outside of the buffered area may continue during this assessment period. Additionally, the San Manuel Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 766 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 5 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within SMBI-4, if any such find occurs and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. SMBMI-2: If significant Native American historical resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within SMBI-4. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-1: Retain a Native American Monitor/Consultant: The Project Applicant shall be required to retain and compensate for the services of a Tribal monitor/consultant who is both approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation Tribal Government and is listed under the NAHC’s Tribal Contact list for the area of the project location. This list is provided by the NAHC. The monitor/consultant will only be present on-site during the construction phases that involve ground disturbing activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 767 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date removal, pot-holing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the project area. The Tribal Monitor/consultant will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the project site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor/consultant have indicated that the site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-2: Unanticipated Discovery of Tribal Cultural and Archaeological Resources: Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, cease construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and tribal monitor/consultant approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the landowner regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the project while Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 768 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 7 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section15064.5 [f]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource”, time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and archaeological resources. Adverse Change in the Significance of an Archeological Resource. GBMIKN-3: Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, they shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 769 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-1: Conduct Paleontological Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct a Paleontological Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training will include a handout and will focus on how to identify paleontological resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities, and the procedures to be followed in such an event; the duties of paleontological monitors; notification and other procedures to follow upon discovery of resources; and, the general steps a qualified professional paleontologist would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-2: Conduct Periodic Paleontological Spot Checks During Grading and Earth-Moving Activities. The Applicant shall retain a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, shall conduct periodic Paleontological Spot Checks beginning at depths below six (6) feet to determine if construction excavations have extended into older Quaternary deposits. After the initial Paleontological Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified paleontologist. If Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 770 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 9 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date the qualified paleontologist determines that construction excavations have extended into the older Quaternary deposits, construction monitoring for Paleontological Resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified paleontological monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The paleontological monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into the older Pleistocene alluvial deposits. Multiple earth- moving construction activities may require multiple paleontological monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known paleontological resources and/or unique geological features, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), and the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of paleontological resources and/or unique geological features encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the qualified professional paleontologist. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Paleontological Resources Are Encountered. In the event that paleontological resources and or Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Page 771 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date unique geological features are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground-disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities shall not be allowed to continue until appropriate paleontological treatment plan has been approved by the Applicant and the City. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with a professional paleontologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. Treatment may include implementation of paleontological salvage excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis or preservation in place. At the paleontologist’s discretion and to reduce construction delay, the grading and excavation contractor shall assist in removing rock samples for initial processing. Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Paleontological Resource. CUL-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. Upon completion of the above activities, the professional paleontologist shall prepare a report summarizing the results of the monitoring and salvaging efforts, the methodology used in these efforts, as well as a description of the fossils collected and their Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 772 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 11 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date significance. The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the City, the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. Disturbance of Human Remains. SMBMI-3: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-4: Unanticipated Discovery of Human Remains and Associated Funerary Objects: Native American human remains are defined in PRC 5097.98 (d)(1) as an inhumation or cremation, and in any state of decomposition or skeletal completeness. Funerary objects, called associated grave goods in PRC 5097.98, are also to be treated according to this statute. Health and Safety Code 7050.5 dictates that any discoveries of human skeletal material shall be immediately reported to the County Coroner and excavation halted until the coroner has determined the nature of the remains. If the coroner recognizes the human remains to be those of a Native American or has reason to believe that they are those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 773 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 12 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) and PRC 5097.98 shall be followed. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-5: Resource Assessment & Continuation of Work Protocol: Upon discovery, the tribal and/or archaeological monitor/consultant/consultant will immediately divert work at minimum of 150 feet and place an exclusion zone around the burial. The monitor/consultant(s) will then notify the Tribe, the qualified lead archaeologist, and the construction manager who will call the coroner. Work will continue to be diverted while the coroner determines whether the remains are Native American. The discovery is to be kept confidential and secure to prevent any further disturbance. If the finds are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the NAHC as mandated by state law who will then appoint a Most Likely Descendent (MLD). Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-6: Kizh-Gabrieleno Procedures for burials and funerary remains: If the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation is designated MLD, the following treatment measures shall be implemented. To the Tribe, the term “human remains” encompasses more than human bones. In ancient as well as historic times, Tribal Traditions included, but were not limited to, the burial of funerary objects with the deceased, and the ceremonial burning of human remains. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 774 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 13 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date These remains are to be treated in the same manner as bone fragments that remain intact. Associated funerary objects are objects that, as part of the death rite or ceremony of a culture, are reasonably believed to have been placed with individual human remains either at the time of death or later; other items made exclusively for burial purposes or to contain human remains can also be considered as associated funerary objects. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-7: Treatment Measures: Prior to the continuation of ground disturbing activities, the land owner shall arrange a designated site location within the footprint of the project for the respectful reburial of the human remains and/or ceremonial objects. In the case where discovered human remains cannot be fully documented and recovered on the same day, the remains will be covered with muslin cloth and a steel plate that can be moved by heavy equipment placed over the excavation opening to protect the remains. If this type of steel plate is not available, a 24-hour guard should be posted outside of working hours. The Tribe will make every effort to recommend diverting the project and keeping the remains in situ and protected. If the project cannot be diverted, it may be determined that burials will be removed. The Tribe will work closely with the qualified archaeologist to ensure that the excavation is treated carefully, ethically and Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 775 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 14 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date respectfully. If data recovery is approved by the Tribe, documentation shall be taken which includes at a minimum detailed descriptive notes and sketches. Additional types of documentation shall be approved by the Tribe for data recovery purposes. Cremations will either be removed in bulk or by means as necessary to ensure completely recovery of all material. If the discovery of human remains includes four or more burials, the location is considered a cemetery and a separate treatment plan shall be created. Once complete, a final report of all activities is to be submitted to the Tribe and the NAHC. The Tribe does NOT authorize any scientific study or the utilization of any invasive diagnostics on human remains. Each occurrence of human remains and associated funerary objects will be stored using opaque cloth bags. All human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects and objects of cultural patrimony will be removed to a secure container on site if possible. These items should be retained and reburied within six months of recovery. The site of reburial/repatriation shall be on the project site but at a location agreed upon between the Tribe and the landowner at a site to be protected in perpetuity. There shall be no publicity regarding any cultural materials recovered. Disturbance of Human Remains. GBMIKN-8: Professional Standards: Archaeological and Native American monitoring and excavation during construction projects will Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Page 776 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 15 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date be consistent with current professional standards. All feasible care to avoid any unnecessary disturbance, physical modification, or separation of human remains and associated funerary objects shall be taken. Principal personnel must meet the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeology and have a minimum of 10 years of experience as a principal investigator working with Native American archaeological sites in southern California. The Qualified Archaeologist shall ensure that all other personnel are appropriately trained and qualified. Department/Tribal Representatives Ground Disturbing Activities. NOISE Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Local Standards During Construction NOI-1: The following measures are required during construction to reduce noise impacts associated with construction: • Temporary noise barriers will be constructed along the northern and eastern property lines. Temporary noise barriers must be constructed of material with a minimum weight of 3 pounds per square foot with no gaps or perforations. Noise barriers may be constructed of, but are not limited to, 5/8-inch plywood, 5/8-inch oriented strand board, or hay bales. These barriers will need to be a minimum of 8-feet in height. The following measures are required of all construction projects implemented under the Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits. Page 777 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 16 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Proposed Plan to reduce noise associated with construction: • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that noise- generating Project construction activities shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on weekdays, including on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays and holidays. • All internal combustion-engine-driven equipment will be equipped with mufflers that are in good operating condition and appropriate for the equipment. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- related noise sources and noise-sensitive receivers nearest the Project site (i.e., to the center) during construction. • Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines (i.e., in excess of 5 minutes) will be prohibited. • Construction activities, including the loading and unloading of materials and truck movements, will be limited to the hours specified in the City Noise Ordinance. • The Project will designate a “construction liaison” that will be responsible for Page 778 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 17 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date responding to any local complaints about construction noise. The liaison will determine the cause of the noise complaints (starting too early, bad muffler, etc.) and institute reasonable measures to correct the problem. A telephone number for the liaison will be conspicuously posted at the construction site. If a noise complaint(s) is registered, the liaison or project representative will retain a noise consultant to conduct noise measurements at the location where the complaint was registered. The noise measurements will be conducted for a minimum of 1 hour and will include 1-minute intervals. The consultant will prepare a letter report summarizing the measurements and potential measures to reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible. The letter report will include all measurement and calculation data used in determining impacts and resolutions. Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Local Standards During Operation NOI-2: The car wash dryer system shall not exceed 82.5 dBA at a distance of five (5) feet and shall be set back within the car wash tunnel approximately eight (8) feet from the exit allowing the tunnel structure to function as a sound attenuation barrier. All car wash supporting equipment including pumps, compressors, vacuum motors, and canister system shall be installed within a dedicated equipment room Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits. Page 779 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 18 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date equipped with passive rooftop ventilation. The car wash shall cease daily operation activities no later than 10:00 p.m. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. SMBMI-4: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in SMBI-1, of any pre-contact resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBM and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. SMBMI-5: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 780 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 19 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-1: Conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for Construction Personnel. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional Tribal monitor who meets U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, to conduct Tribal Cultural Resources Sensitivity Training for construction personnel prior to commencement of excavation activities. The training session shall be carried out by a Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The training session will include a handout and will focus on how to identify tribal cultural resources that may be encountered during earthmoving activities and the procedures to be followed in such an event, the duties of Tribal monitors, and, the general steps a qualified professional Tribal monitor would follow in conducting a salvage investigation if one is necessary. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-2: Conduct Periodic Tribal Cultural Resources Spot Checks during grading and earth-moving activities. The Applicant shall retain a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards to conduct periodic Tribal Cultural Resource Spot Checks beginning at depths below two (2) feet to determine if construction excavations have exposed or have a Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 781 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 20 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date high probability of exposing tribal cultural resources. After the initial Spot Check, further periodic checks will be conducted at the discretion of the qualified Tribal monitor. If the qualified Tribal monitor determines that construction excavations have exposed or have a high probability of exposing Tribal artifacts, construction monitoring for tribal cultural resources will be required. The Applicant shall retain a qualified Tribal monitor, who will work under the guidance and direction of a professional archaeologist, who meets the qualifications set forth by the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. The Tribal monitor shall be present during all construction excavations (e.g., grading, trenching, or clearing/grubbing) into non-fill sediments. Multiple earth-moving construction activities may require multiple Tribal monitors. The frequency of monitoring shall be based on the rate of excavation and grading activities, proximity to known tribal cultural resources, the materials being excavated (native versus artificial fill soils), the depth of excavation, and if found, the abundance and type of tribal cultural resources encountered. Full-time monitoring can be reduced to part-time inspections if determined adequate by the Project Tribal monitor. Page 782 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Arbor Express Car Wash 21 June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-3: Cease Ground-Disturbing Activities and Implement Treatment Plan if Tribal Cultural Resources Are Encountered. In the event that tribal cultural resources are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, ground- disturbing activities shall be halted or diverted away from the vicinity of the find so that the find can be evaluated. A buffer area of at least 50 feet shall be established around the find where construction activities will not be allowed to continue until a qualified Tribal monitor has examined the newly discovered artifact(s) and has evaluated the area of the find. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area. All tribal cultural resources unearthed by Project construction activities shall be evaluated by a qualified professional who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards. Should the newly discovered artifacts be determined to be prehistoric, Native American Tribes/Individuals should be contacted and consulted, and Native American construction monitoring should be initiated. The Applicant and City shall coordinate with the Tribal monitor to develop an appropriate treatment plan for the resources. The plan may include implementation of Tribal data recovery excavations to address treatment of the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 783 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 22 City of Rancho Cucamonga June 8, 2020 IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE MONITORING VERIFICATION Implementation Entity Monitoring and Verification Entity Timing Requirements Signature Date Adverse Change in Significance of a Tribal Cultural Resource. TCR-4: Prepare Report Upon Completion of Monitoring Services. The Tribal monitor, under the direction of a qualified professional archaeologist who meets the U.S. Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications and Standards, shall prepare a final report at the conclusion of Tribal monitoring (if required). The report shall be submitted to the Applicant, the South Central Costal Information Center, the City, and representatives of other appropriate or concerned agencies to signify the satisfactory completion of the Project and required mitigation measures. The report shall include a description of resources unearthed, if any, evaluation of the resources with respect to the California Register and CEQA, and treatment of the resources. Project Proponent City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department/Tribal Representatives Prior to and Throughout Excavation/ Ground Disturbing Activities. Page 784 RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00533, A REQUEST TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR ONE 0.85 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 1.21 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APNS: 0208-291-01 –02 AND -03. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018-00 533 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing on March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06 -acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land are currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Page 785 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 c. This amendment will change the land use for three parcels of land. Parcel 0208- 291 -01 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Parcels 0208- 291 -01 and -02 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential; and d. This amendment necessitates amending the Zoning Map (DRC2018 -00534) to change zoning designation of one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291 -03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and of two adjacent non- project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest as it is consistent with General Plan policies LU-1.2 and LU-2.4. Policy LU-1.2 states “Designate appropriate land uses to serve the local needs and be able to respond to regional market needs, as appropriate.” The development of the carwash land use will serve the local population’s carwash needs and will support the surrounding community’s needs as Arrow Route are identified as a Major Arterial (General Plan Figure CM-2) with a significant daily traffic volume. Policy LU-2.4 states “Promote complementary infill development, rehabilitation, and re-use that contribute positively to the surrounding residential neighborhood areas.” The development of a car wash on the two project- related parcels of land will contribute positively to the surrounding residential area by permitting significant site plan and aesthetic improvements to an underutilized project site. b. This amendment is consistent with the adopted general plan, including the housing element. The amendment will not negatively impact the housing elements overarching goal to provide opportunities and incentives for the provision of a variety of housing types and for all economic segments wishing to reside in the community regardless of race, religion, sex, or income group. This amendment maintains the housing element goal of providing adequate housing sites to allow and create new opportunities that enable a broad range of housing types; and c. The City may only reduce the residential density for a parcel if it identifies sufficient sites so that there is no net loss of residential capacity. When the City prepared the 2013 Housing Element Update only vacant parcels were analyzed to address the City’s regional housing need (underutilized parcels and those with active development applications were not included) and the City identified an adequate number of vacant parcels to meet the regional housing need. The easterly 0.85-acre parcel of land was identified by the capacity analysis of the Low Medium (LM) Residential District. To overcome the loss of housing capacity, the applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan and zoning designation for two non-project related parcels Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation Page 786 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 (208-29-01 and -02) located to the east of the project site from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District; and d. The 0.85-acre project-related parcel of land has a maximum potential residential density of 6.8 units under the current Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Rezoning the two adjacent non-project related parcels of land (1.21 acres) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District (4-8 dwelling units per acre) to Medium (M) Residential District (8-14 dwelling units per acre) will increase the potential residential density from 9.68 dwelling units per acre to 16.94 dwelling units per acre, an increase in density of 7.26 dwelling units per acre. This change in the zoning designation will overcome the potential loss of housing opportunities created by the rezoning of the project-specific parcel of land (7.26 VS 6.8 dwelling units per acre) and will in turn make the project compliant with the no-net-loss provision in Senate Bill No. 166 (SB 166); and e. That th e proposed amendment would not have significant impacts on the environment nor the surrounding properties. The amendment will change the zoning designation for one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and for two adjacent parcels of land (APN: 0208- 291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the project would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Page 787 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-15 GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018- 00533, as depicted in Attachment A, attached hereto. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 20 21. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote- to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 788 Page 789 Page 790 Page 791 Page 792 Page 793 RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DESIGN REVIEW DRC2018-00535, A REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW OF A 5,078 SQUARE FOOT CARWASH AND ASSOCIATED 1,296 SQUARE FOOT DETAILING CENTER ON 1.36 ACRE PROJECT SITE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND THE LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF – APN: 0208-291-03 AND -06. A. Recitals. 1. Alan Smith filed an application for the approval of Design Review DRC2018-00535, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings of March 10, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The 1.36-acre project site is located on the north side of Arrow Route, approximately 200 feet west of Archibald Avenue; and b. The project site is made up of vacant 0.51 acre of land in the General Commercial (GC) District and .85 acre of land developed with a single-family residence in the Low Medium (LM) Residential district; and c. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Public Facility/ Low (L) Residential District Page 794 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 2 d. The project is for the development of a 5,078 square foot carwash and associated 1,296 square foot detailing center; and e. The project complies with all requirements of the Development Code including setbacks, parking, design, and landscape coverage; and a. The project provides 40 parking spaces, 24 parking spaces above the minimum requirement of 16 parking spaces; and b. The project scope includes General Plan amendment DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map amendment DRC2020-00534 to change the land use and zoning designation on one of two parcels that makes up the project site along with two off-site parcels of land, Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 to operate the carwash and Tree Removal Permit DRC2019-00218 to remove onsite trees. 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan. The proposed carwash will be consistent with the General Plan with the approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-00533, which will amend the General Plan land use designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) to General Commercial (GC); and b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. Carwash facilities are permitted within the General Commercial (GC) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project will be in compliance with the Zoning Map with approval of the related Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District; and c. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project will be in compliance with the Development Code with approval of the related Zoning Map amendment DRC2018-00534, which will amend the zoning designation of one on the project related parcels of land (107705136) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District. Carwash facilities are a conditionally permitted use within the General Commercial (GC) District. Conditional Use Permit DRC2018-00536 was submitted for the operation of the car wash. The project complies with all other development criteria outlined in the Development Code including setbacks, parking and design; and Center Civic/Regional East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation Page 795 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 3 d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. The related environmental review outlines potential environmental impacts related to the project and identifies project-specific mitigation measures that reduce these impacts to less-than- significant. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the application, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that no subsequent or supplemental environmental document is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in connection with the review and approval of this application based upon the following findings and determinations: a. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and the City’s local CEQA Guidelines, MIG, Inc. has prepared an Initial Study of the potential environmental effects of the project, which was peer-reviewed by Ascent Environmental, a consultant contracted by the City to review this document. Based on the findings contained in that Initial Study, it was determined that, with the imposition of mitigation measures, there would be no substantial evidence that the p roject would have a significant effect on the environment. Based on that determination, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared. Thereafter, the City staff provided public notice of the public comment period and of the intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Mitigated Negative Declaration and all comments received regarding the Mitigated Negative Declaration and, based on the whole record before it, finds: (i) that the Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in compliance with CEQA; and (ii) that, based on the imposition of mitigation measures, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. The Planning Commission further finds that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. Based on these findings, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration. c. The Planning Commission has also reviewed and considered the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project that has been prepared pursuant to the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 and finds that such Program is designed to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures during project implementation. The Planning Commission, therefore, recommends that the City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program for the project. d. The custodian of records for the Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission’s recommendation is based are the Planning Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Those documents are available for public review in the Planning Department of the City of Rancho Cucamonga located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamo nga, California 91730, telephone (909) 477-2750. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth below and in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Planning Department 1) The approval of Design Review DRC2018-00 535 is contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment DRC2018-0053 3 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. Page 796 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-14 DR DRC2018-00535 – ALAN SMITH March 10, 2021 Page 4 The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of March 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 797 Page 798 Page 799 Page 800 Page 801 Page 802 Page 803 Page 804 Page 805 Attachment 2Page806 Page 807 Page 808 Page 809 Page 810 Page 811 Page 812 DRC2018-00535 – Arbor Carwash Timeline Original Application Submittal – June 18, 2018 Application Resubmittals – October 11, 2018 December 18, 2018 February 26, 2019 Incompleteness Determinations – July 18, 2018 November 08, 2018 January 17, 2019 Completeness Determination – May 8, 2019 Neighborhood Meeting – April 29, 2019 Design Review Committee - December 17, 2019 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Hired – January 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments – February 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted – March 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments Round 2 - April 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted – End of April 2020 CEQA Peer Review Consultant Comments Round 3 – May 2020 CEQA Peer Review Resubmitted – June 2020 CEQA Peer Review Accepted as Complete July 2020 Planning Commission Hearing Continuance August 12, 2020 (Applicant Requested to Change Project Scope) September 2020 – Meetings with applicant’s legal representative to discuss GPA October-November 2020 – (info gathered from email sent by applicant to staff on 11/10/20) applicant attempting to work with school district to obtain a letter memorializing their support of the proposed rezone of the property at 9782 Arrow Route to MH) December 2020 - CEQA Consultant Revises IS/MND to reflect revised GPA Planning Commission – March 10, 2021 Scheduled for City Council Review – June 2, 2021 Attachment 3 Page 813 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING GENERAL PLAN MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00533, AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT NO. DRC2018-00534 - A REQUEST TO 1) AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FOR ONE 0.85 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND TOTALING 1.21 ACRES OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL TO MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL AND 2) AMEND THE ZONING MAP LAND USE DISTRICT FOR ONE PARCEL OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (GC) DISTRICT AND FOR TWO PARCELS OF LAND FROM LOW MEDIUM (LM) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT TO MEDIUM (M) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT FOR A SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTH SIDE OF ARROW ROUTE AND WEST OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE; – APNS: 0208-291-01 –02 AND -03. A.Recitals. 1.Alan Smith filed an application for General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018-00533 as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject General Plan Amendment is referred to as "the application." 2.On March 10, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the General Plan and Zoning Map amendments. 3.On June 2, 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on the application and concluded said hearing on that date. 4.All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B.Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing on June 2, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows: a.The application applies to three parcels consisting of approximately 2.06-acres of land, located north side of Arrow Route and west of Archibald Avenue. Said parcels of land are currently designated as Low Medium Residential; and b. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning Designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Attachment 4Page814 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH June 2, 2021 Page 2 Page 2 c.This amendment would change the land use for three parcels of land. Parcel 0208-291-01 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to General Commercial and Parcels 0208-291-01 and -02 will be changed from Low Medium Residential to Medium Residential; and d.This amendment would amend the Zoning Map (DRC2018-00534) to change the zoning designation of one project related parcel of land (APN: 0208-291-03) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to General Commercial (GC) District and of two adjacent non-project specific parcels of land (APN: 0208-291-01 and -02) from Low Medium (LM) Residential District to Medium (M) Residential District. 3.Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above- referenced public hearing and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, the City Council hereby finds and concludes as follows: a.The establishment of a new car wash does not rise to the level of importance to grant an amendment to the General Plan. There is no documented shortage of car wash facilities in Rancho Cucamonga at this time. Car wash facilities do not further the City’s economic development goals. b.The applicant for this general plan amendment has understood that the project approval relies on the legislative action being considered tonight and has been willing to continue this process in spite of the risk that the general plan amendment might not be approved. c.Car wash is not a land use that warrants the consideration of one of a limited number of allowable general plan amendments. The City Council previously implemented a moratorium on the car wash use to amend the standards for new car wash uses, which are predominantly in District 2, thereby requiring a higher level of scrutiny to approve. Further, the City Council recently established a moratorium on service station uses, which are also predominantly in District 2, to establish more regulations and performance standards for this auto- oriented use. These recent measures to further study and restrict auto-related uses, both of which have historically dominated the economic development of District 2, indicate the opposite of a justification of a general plan amendment for a car wash. Further, should the City Council approve Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Vacant General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Single-Family Residence Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District North School Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District South Commercial Center General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District Family Resource Center Public Facility/ Civic/Regional Low (L) Residential District East Single-Family Residence1 Low Medium Residential Low Medium (LM) Residential District West Service Station2 General Commercial General Commercial (GC) District 1 – “Beverly Hills House” (designated a local historic landmark on January 18, 1989) on APN: 0208-291-03; 2 – Non-operational but approved for reactivation Page 815 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 21-XX GPA DRC2018-00533 – ALAN SMITH June 2, 2021 Page 3 Page 3 the car wash General Plan, it will be unable to approve a General Plan Amendment for one of the major industrial projects (all of which are 500,000 SF to $1,500,000 sf unless that project is held for 3-4 months until 2022. d.The future land use vision for Arrow and Archibald neighborhood, as proposed in the draft PlanRC Land Plan does not include auto-related uses. The subject property will no longer be designated as LM Residential but is not proposed to accommodate a car wash use in the future designation either. As the comprehensive General Plan update is in process, staff asserts that this amendment to a single parcel of land is not timely. A project that is compliant with the current land use and zoning designation could be considered, but any reconsideration of land use on these parcels should only be considered as part of the comprehensive update. e.Car wash uses are not compatible with residential neighborhoods. The General Plan and Zone map amendment would intensify these two incompatible uses by increasing density and allowing even more residential dwelling units to be in close proximity to the car wash. There are many other locations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga where a car wash could be located at a much further distance from neighboring residences and creating none of these incompatibilities. 5.Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, above, this Council hereby denies General Plan Amendment No. DRC2018-00533 and Zoning Map Amendment DRC2018-00534. 6.The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby directed to: (a) certify to the adoption of this Resolution, and (b) forthwith transmit a certified copy of this Resolution, by certified Mail, return receipt requested, Alan Smith, at the address identified in City records. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 2nd DAY OF JUNE 2021. ________________________ L.. Dennis Michael, Mayor City of Rancho Cucamonga ATTEST: ________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________James L. Markman, City Attorney Richards, Watson & Gershon CERTIFICATION: I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution 2021-___, was duly adopted by the City. Page 816 Page 817 Page 818 Page 819 Page 820 Page 821 Page 822 Page 823 Page 824 Page 825 DATE:June 2, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner SUBJECT:Public Hearing for Consideration of Adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 981, Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency thereof and Making a Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 981) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopt Interim Ordinance No. 981 entitled "An Interim Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Extending for an Additional 10 Months and 15 Days, Through April 20, 2022, an Existing Moratorium on the Approval of Applications for Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Declaring the Urgency Thereof and Making A Determination of Exemption Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)," by four-fifths vote, waive full reading, and read by title only. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 65858 provides, “Without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the legislative body of a…city…to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated General Plan, Specific Plan, or Zoning proposal that the legislative body, Planning Commission or the Planning Department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions may be adopted.” At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager to research and compile information about service stations in the City related to the following topics of concern: Page 826 Page 2 7 4 4 The number and location of existing service stations in the City; Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community; Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses; Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential neighborhoods; Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public safety services; Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station projects in the future. On April 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM, the City Council conducted a special study session during which they received a report prepared by staff (Attachment 1) that described the impacts of service stations in the City. The City Council then discussed these impacts, the moratorium’s purpose, and the applicability/timing of the moratorium. At their regular meeting at 7:00 PM on that date, the City Council subsequently adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (Attachment 2) establishing an interim urgency ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, establishing a moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses in the City. The temporary interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on June 5, 2021. The moratorium does not apply to: a. the improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that the development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas/fuel pumps, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or b. an application for a service station that has been deemed Complete or received all discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six months of the moratorium’s effective date (April 21, 2021). Staff notes that applications submitted during the moratorium may be subject to permanent development standards that are adopted during the moratorium or after the moratorium expires. ANALYSIS: Since the approval of the interim urgency ordinance, staff has developed and has begun implementing a plan to evaluate all aspects of service station development in the City. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(d), on May 5, 2021, the City Council issued a report (Attachment 3) describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980. These measures include determining the relevant topics related to service station development that need to be evaluated, the process and timeline for conducting these analyses, and potential solutions to address issues that have been identified with service station development. Page 827 Page 3 7 4 4 The City’s Planning and Engineering Services Departments and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) are the primary departments tasked with the review of applications for proposed new development/redevelopment, including service station development, in the City. Staff from these departments, in coordination with other departments such as the City’s Finance Department and the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department as necessary, have undertaken, or will undertake, the following specific activities during the moratorium: a) The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and the Development Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design standards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City will be identifying updates that will specifically address the development and operation of service stations. The public draft of the General Plan will be released for public review in the second quarter of 2021. The associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is currently being prepared and will be circulated for public review in mid-2021. In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating whether the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World Class Community.’ Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development, and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into the future. This is especially important as staff periodically receives inquiries about service station development. Knowing these answers will assist staff in comprehensively responding to these inquiries. Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result, it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances where a service station may become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they will be updated. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The purpose of this will be to minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the City. The updates to these documents will also include an analysis of the land use compatibility of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of service stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated by service stations. Both topics are discussed further below: Page 828 Page 4 7 4 4 b) Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City is generally trending downward. Staff will also be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by service stations in other cities to see how they compare to the revenue generated in the City. Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations’ fiscal performance in this context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost to provide them). c) Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service per year. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours per year. The average amount of time spent on location (all services stations combined) is about 1,870 hours per year. The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable manner. Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations. It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations in the City. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24 hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands on public safety resources. To assist in this evaluation, staff will verify the operational characteristics of each of the service stations in the City and compare that information with the calls for service to determine if there is any relationship between them. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably; d) Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by: advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to more efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as ridesharing services and mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles Page 829 Page 5 7 4 4 with conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future; e) After the above-noted research is completed, staff will prepare proposed amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations within the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2022. As part of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example, regulate physical development requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections and the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating conditions such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and determine what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included with service stations such as the sale of fresh food. As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older, built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with service stations. This will also include a verification of the number of service stations in these jurisdictions which, in turn, will be used determine whether the number of service stations in the City is sufficient to serve the community’s needs. f) Next steps - timeline: The next steps and timeline in the process are as follows: 1. Issue identification and discovery - identify problems and validate/calibrate with other City Departments and (when necessary) external stakeholders – current activity and continuing into 3rd and 4th quarter of 2021; 2. Explore options – share initial list of solutions with stakeholders, understand efficacy of the options, and determine support for solutions – current activity and continuing into 3rd and 4th quarter of 2021; 3. Prepare preferred solutions – propose changes to the Development Code (and any other solutions), and understand efficacy of the options, and determine support for solutions – 3rd and 4th quarter of 2021; 4. Planning Commission – recommendations on proposed amendments to the Development Code – 1st or 2nd quarter of 2022; 5. City Council - adoption of permanent development standards for service stations – 2nd quarter 2022. The existing moratorium adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 is scheduled to expire on June 5, 2021. The proposed Interim Urgency Ordinance attached to this report as Attachment 4 would extend the moratorium for an additional 10 months and 15 days, through April 20, 2022. If the City is unable to complete the steps outlined above before April 20, 2022, the City Council may, but does not have to, extend the moratorium on new or expanded service stations for up to an additional year. FISCAL IMPACT: None with this action. Page 830 Page 6 7 4 4 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: Enacting an interim moratorium on service station development in the City will further the City Council's goals for balanced and responsible long term land use planning, fiscally efficient public safety services, and the attainment of economic development diversity. Specifically, it will facilitate the City’s core values of providing and nurturing a high quality of life; promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community; and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – City Council Staff Report (April 21, 2021) for Interim Urgency Ordinance Attachment 2 – Ordinance No. 980 Attachment 3 – City Council 10-Day Staff Report (May 5, 2021) Attachment 4 – Ordinance No. 981 Page 831 DATE: April 21, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner SUBJECT:Discussion of Service Stations in Rancho Cucamonga and Consideration of Urgency Zoning Ordinance No. 980, to Establish an Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance to Establish a Moratorium for a Period of 45 Days on the Approval of Building Permits or Other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses. (INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: At the April 21, 2021, 7:00 PM, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Council Chambers, staff recommends the City Council discuss the status of service station uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and adopt Urgency Ordinance No. 980 entitled "An Interim Urgency Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing a Moratorium on The Approval of Applications for Building Permits or other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga”, by four- fifths vote, waive full reading, and read by title only. BACKGROUND: The City currently has received applications for four service station projects that are currently under review. They are all located in the southwest area of the City, generally referred to as the “Cucamonga neighborhood,” that is bound by Foothill Boulevard, Haven Avenue, 4th Street, and the City’s boundaries with the cities of Ontario and Upland. Planning staff has also received multiple inquiries in recent months about the possibility of adding alcohol sales at other existing service stations in the City and thereby increasing the intensity of this use. The increase in the number of applications for service station uses, combined with a decrease in submittals for other types of general commercial uses and the concentration of service stations in one particular area of the City, has raised concerns. This includes questions about the impacts this might have on the City’s long-term land use and economic development goals, and how service stations benefit or impact the districts in which they are located. At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager to research and compile information about service stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga related to the following topics of concern: Attachment 1 Page 832 Page 2 7 0 0 The number and location of existing service stations in the city; Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community; Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses; Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential neighborhoods; Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public safety services; Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station projects in the future. This report addresses some of this data/analysis. And, these are issues that City staff would continue to research and study during the term of the proposed moratorium. ANALYSIS: “Service stations” are, as the name indicates, a service use that meets the needs of both residents and travelers in the city. From our own experience, we can understand the value of being able to purchase service and get basic automobile services in convenient locations within a reasonable distance of home or work. There are 32 active service stations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, which is approximately 0.69 service stations per square mile. There are two additional sites that have been approved to open/reopen but which have not received building permits yet. Attachment 1 shows the location of existing service stations and their distribution across the city. The distance of any service station from most homes in the developed part of the city is within five minutes “drive time” as shown in Attachment 2. The majority of the existing service stations are located in commercial centers and generally isolated from nearby residential properties. However, some of these service stations are located in, or adjacent to, residential neighborhoods. For example, one proposed application for a new service station and associated convenience store would be located directly across the street from an existing multi-family residential complex on Archibald Avenue. In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, it is reasonable to ask if Rancho Cucamonga is adequately served by the existing service station locations to meet the basic needs and expectations of our residents and visitors. This is an important question because the city is becoming more “built-out” with less vacant land available for development that helps us meet the Council and community’s vision for a world class community. Also, much of the remaining vacant land is surrounded by existing development which can be residential neighborhoods or schools and parks where children are at play. One proposed service station project would be located directly adjacent to a school on Archibald Avenue. It has become increasingly important to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. In the absence of an industry standard, staff has considered the following points when considering whether or not the number and/or distribution of service stations is appropriate: General Plan and Development Code: The current General Plan was adopted in 2010 and the Development Code was comprehensively updated in 2012. The City is currently in the process of updating both documents. As part of this update, staff is evaluating the goals/policies and regulations that relate to existing/potential development and land uses in the city. Staff has observed that neither existing document adequately addresses certain Page 833 Page 3 7 0 0 types of development such as service stations that may be incompatible with, for example, residential neighborhoods. In some zones, service stations are permitted without discretionary review. And there are very few performance standards for service stations in our current Development Code. The definition of service station itself, does not consider forms of fuel, and is outdated. The definition of the use should be refined to contemplate how natural gas and electric vehicle fueling stations are treated under the City’s zoning regulations. Further, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities. The PlanRC General Plan Update and subsequent Development Code update effort is expected to be adopted in the winter of 2021/2022. The City is reviewing applications for proposed service stations at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street (7-Eleven project), and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. The applications for both projects were submitted within the last year, but have not received final review; the 7-Eleven project has been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. The construction plans for a previously approved “reactivation” of a closed service station at the northeast corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route are under review. There is also a service station that is being reconstructed/redeveloped at the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive. These are both in the building plan check review process. Inquiries have also been received about developing service stations at Vineyard Avenue and 8th Street, Foothill Boulevard and Etiwanda Avenue, and Foothill Boulevard and Grove Avenue. The City has identified in the General Plan numerous major street intersections as sites for intensive “gateway” development such as offices, hotels, and large commercial centers. The purpose of this is to achieve and maintain the City’s goal of being “A World Class Community.” As companies/operators of service stations desire locations that are highly visible to potential customers, they often select sites that are located at these same street intersections (such as those noted above). The development of service stations at these major intersections is contrary to this particular goal. As indicated above, there are currently 34 service stations in the city, two of which are inactive and under redevelopment. For purposes of comparison, within the cities of Fontana, Ontario, and Upland there are 21, 20, and 17 service stations, respectively. This is significantly fewer per square mile than in Rancho Cucamonga, for Fontana and Ontario, but greater in Upland, which has 1.09 per square mile. As noted previously and shown in Attachment 2, most areas of Rancho Cucamonga are within five minutes “drive time” of a service station. A disproportionate amount of the city’s existing service stations are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the city. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2 and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, there are only five service stations (each) within Districts 1 and 4. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks for the residents within those districts due to potential contaminants present at Page 834 Page 4 7 0 0 service stations. From an environmental justice perspective, how service stations are permitted and regulated needs to be considered under the City’s General Plan and Development Code to avoid an undue concentration of them in any one part of the city. Due to the relatively large number of service stations that exist and have been proposed in the city, staff believes that a moratorium is warranted to evaluate whether more service stations are in the public interest, further the goals of the PlanRC General Plan update and balance the public benefit with potential public safety and environmental costs. Operational Impacts: Currently, there are no operational nor technical standards in the development code regarding service stations. Thus, staff has limited tools available to effectively address the impacts caused by service station development and ensure that no adverse impacts occur from new service stations. The City has the opportunity now to develop more detailed standards and operational requirements in the Development Code update currently underway. Examples would include regulating hours of operation, lighting, and security/safety, proximity to neighboring development such as residences, vehicles queueing onto an adjacent street or in a parking lot which could interfere with traffic circulation and public safety access; noise generated by vehicle engines and/or customers; and glare caused by canopy lights. If passed, a moratorium would allow staff to evaluate the typical operations of a service station in greater detail, the technical standards that should apply to them, and, incorporate necessary requirements and regulations that will minimize their operational and site development impacts. Fiscal Considerations: Service stations generate tax revenue primarily from the sale of gasoline, as shown in Attachment 3. Based on the data in Attachment 3 that shows the annual tax revenue for the City between 2008 and 2020, revenue has fluctuated and ranges from a high of $2.4 million in 2012 to a low of $1.5 million in 2020. This results in an average revenue of about $2.0 million per year. When accounting for the impacts of reduced demand for fuel caused by travel restrictions imposed due to the COVID pandemic in 2020 (and therefore not including that year in the calculation as an acknowledgement that 2020 was an anomalous year), the average revenue between 2008 and 2019 is about $1.9 million. Nevertheless, there clearly has been a decline in demand overall and, in turn, sales tax revenue that is generated. There is evidence suggesting that the above-noted tax revenue will decline over time in part due to the availability and preference of alternative energy sources for powering an automobile. For example, electric cars powered by batteries are becoming more commonplace. It is estimated that by 2030, more than a one third of all new vehicles sold will be fully or partially electric powered (via batteries). As battery charging can occur at home, work, or in parking lots, the need for service stations is likely to decline in a corresponding manner. The declining demand for gasoline due to changes in technology and consumer preferences may increase competition among the existing service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Interestingly, some studies suggest that the decline in tobacco sales and paper maps, also contribute to declining revenues at service stations. Furthermore, as hydrogen, liquid petroleum service (LPG), compressed natural service (CNG), and biofuels become more readily adopted as power sources for automobiles, Page 835 Page 5 7 0 0 conventional service stations could potentially become obsolete or unable to provide the demand for these alternative fuels. Also, ride sharing services such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are now a feasible and, frequently, a preferred alternative to personal vehicles. The preference of mobility alternatives is expected to increase in the future. That will result in reduced personal automobile usage which will, in turn, reduce demand for service stations of any kind. Both the use of alternative fuels and ride sharing will result in service stations becoming fiscal “underperformers.” Possibly reflecting this decline in demand, the applicants for a previously approved “reactivation” of a service station located at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue have not obtained permits to reconstruct and operate it despite receiving entitlements, i.e. Planning Commission approval, to do so several years ago. Staff believes this presents an example of the concerns that a potentially obsolete land use, and the property where it is located, will not contribute to the fiscal goals of the City. There is merit in considering the fiscal impacts of former service station sites becoming “brownfield” sites. Former service stations will require significant investment to remediate any potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Inactive/closed sites may be abandoned and left unused for years. The removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring sensitive receptors. Lastly, as described in further detail below, there are fiscal impacts related to public safety. The fiscal impact of public safety calls for service and the time spent at the service stations is important to consider. The fully-loaded cost (including benefits, equipment and overhead) for a full-time deputy is about $337,000 per year, or $162 per hour. Thus, when averaging the period between 2016 and 2020 the total annual fiscal impact to the City when responding to service calls at all service stations was about $302,940. This is equates to approximately 15% of the revenue generated by these services stations on just calls for service by the Police Department. Public Safety: The demand for public safety services is shown in Attachment 4. Based on data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that period of 5 years (2016-2020), this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls (during the same 5-year period) has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours with an average amount of about 1,870 hours on location. The number of calls for service and the time spent at these service stations result in public safety resources being used in a manner that is likely inefficient and potentially not sustainable. These service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the City. It should be noted that the total calls for service is not equal among the various service stations as shown in Attachment 5. The lowest average amount of calls between 2016 and 2020 is 6.6 calls (each) at the service stations located at 7996 Archibald Avenue and 10477 Lemon Avenue that are operated by Shell and Mobil, respectively. The highest average amount of calls during that same period of time is 68 calls at the service station located at 8808 Foothill Boulevard (Shell). It is not yet clear why there is a disparity in the number of service calls. There has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service (including 2021 to date) for all service stations. Page 836 Page 6 7 0 0 CONCLUSION: The analysis of issues related to service stations makes clear that service stations pose a threat to public health, safety, and welfare and the City must evaluate new regulations to address that threat. This could range from additional standards in the development code to limitations on future service station locations. Staff supports the adoption of an urgency interim ordinance in order to study and develop those regulations, as follows. PROPOSED MORATORIUM: The City Council has the option of adopting an interim urgency ordinance based on the information provided in this report. Government Code Section 65858 provides: “Without following the procedures otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, the legislative body of a…city…to protect the public safety, health, and welfare, may adopt as an urgency measure an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated General Plan, Specific Plan, or Zoning proposal that the legislative body, Planning Commission or the Planning Department is considering or studying or intends to study within a reasonable time. That urgency measure shall require a four-fifths vote of the legislative body for adoption. The interim ordinance shall be of no further force and effect 45 days from its date of adoption. After notice pursuant to Section 65090 and public hearing, the legislative body may extend the interim ordinance for 10 months and 15 days and subsequently extend the interim ordinance for one year. Any extension shall also require a four-fifths vote for adoption. Not more than two extensions may be adopted.” The City has an obligation to ensure that all development minimizes impacts and that the benefits to existing and future residents are maximized. Staff believes there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by proposals to expand and/or develop new service stations and that a moratorium is necessary. The Development Code refers to “gas stations” as “service stations.” The proposed interim urgency ordinance that would adopt the moratorium uses the latter term. The City is proposing a moratorium that will apply to the issuance of building permits and other land use entitlements, such as, new Design Review and Conditional Use Permit applications for service stations within the City. This will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map (where applicable/necessary) to develop appropriate regulations to achieve a reasonable level of assurances that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall Community and ensure a positive and mutually acceptable set of outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and service station developers. The moratorium will not apply to the limited improvement or renovation of an existing service station such as interior modifications, exterior repainting, and general maintenance, or the demolition of an existing service station. The moratorium will allow for a comprehensive analysis of service stations during which staff will analyze the compatibility of service stations with neighboring land uses, the impact and demand on public safety resources, and other appropriate regulations. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the initial term of the moratorium is 45 days (expiring on June 5, 2021). Staff does not anticipate completing the work required to incorporate new service station development regulations into the General Plan and Development Code within this 45-day period. Therefore, staff expects to bring a further ordinance to extend the term of the moratorium for up to 10 months, 15 days. Ten days before the proposed extension, staff will Page 837 Page 7 7 0 0 provide a report to the City Council for consideration that identifies steps to address the potential impacts caused by service station development during the moratorium’s initial term. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – Map of the Locations of Existing and Previously Approved Service Stations Attachment 2 – Map of the Proximity of Service Stations (Five Minute “Drive Time”) to Areas of the City Attachment 3 – Fiscal Analysis Attachment 4 – Spreadsheet Public Safety Calls for Service Attachment 5 – Map of Service Stations Identifying the Range of Calls for Service Attachment 6 – Draft Urgency Ordinance No. 980 Page 838 Approved Not Operational Approved Not Operational Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA G a s S t a t i o n s1 " = 3 , 4 0 0 f e e t 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Gas Stations by Alcohol Sales Sells alcohol Does not sell alcohol Council District 1 has 5 Stations Council District 2 has 13 Stations Council District 3 has 11 Stations Council District 4 has 5 Stations Attachment 1 Page 839 Approved Not Operational Approved Not Operational Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, City of Rancho Cucamonga, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/NASA, USGS, Bureau of Land Management, EPA, NPS, USDA 5 M i n u t e D r i v e T i m e f r o m G a s S t a t i o n s1 " = 5 , 2 8 0 f e e t 0 10.5 Miles Legend Gas Stations 5.0 Minutes Attachment 2 Page 840 Service Station – Annual Sales Tax Revenue Analysis (2008 – 2020) Year Annual Sales Tax Revenue 2008 $2,041,400.68 2009 $1,615,184.14 2010 $1,868,335.21 2011 $2,238,239.53 2012 $2,426,457.82 2013 $2,261,404.95 2014 $2,244,070.71 2015 $2,049,208.59 2016 $1,768,133.12 2017 $1,816,753.47 2018 $2,031,354.18 2019 $2,194,465.74 2020 $1,496,374.00 $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Millions Attachment 3 Page 841 TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE At Service Stations 637 910 1034 979 1059 923.8 City Overall 146,254 159,059 155,537 151,562 142,344 150,951 Percentage of Calls at Service Stations Relative to the City (overall)0.44%0.57%0.66%0.65%0.74%0.61% TIME SPENT ON LOCATION (HOURS)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE At Service Stations 1,100.75 1,867.44 1,982.12 1,946.32 2,455.44 1,870.41 City Overall 158,217.34 227,420.26 220,288.82 231,371.81 216,508.65 210,761.38 Percentage of Time at Service Stations Relative to the City (overall)0.70%0.82%0.90%0.84%1.13%0.88% 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (to date)Total 2016-2020 Average TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE (BY LOCATION)637 910 1,034 979 1,059 135 4,754 923.80 TOTAL REPORTS PREPARED (BY LOCATION)109 157 174 176 166 24 806 156.40 32 15 38 31 26 2 144 28.40 9 15 38 31 26 2 121 23.80 2 5 11 8 7 2 35 6.60 1 5 11 8 7 2 34 6.40 16 30 43 73 85 10 257 49.40 3 30 43 73 85 10 244 46.80 2 21 16 29 20 2 90 17.60 2 21 16 29 20 2 90 17.60 9 5 20 9 7 2 52 10.00 4 5 20 9 7 2 47 9.00 0 21 41 78 95 12 247 47.00 0 21 41 78 95 12 247 47.00 19 24 27 23 23 5 121 23.20 7 24 27 23 23 5 109 20.80 41 39 31 35 41 7 194 37.40 14 39 31 35 41 7 167 32.00 1 21 24 27 41 3 117 22.80 1 21 24 27 41 3 117 22.80 63 65 48 55 56 6 293 57.40 25 65 48 55 56 6 255 49.80 44 57 79 64 69 9 322 62.60 10 57 79 64 69 9 288 55.80 26 27 12 20 13 3 101 19.60 8 27 12 20 13 3 83 16.00 13 21 19 15 8 2 78 15.20 7 21 19 15 8 2 72 14.00 37 76 64 69 44 6 296 58.00 14 76 64 69 44 6 273 53.40 6 12 4 4 7 2 35 6.60 3 12 4 4 7 2 32 6.00 23 28 38 34 28 5 156 30.20 9 28 38 34 28 5 142 27.40 5 5 0 0 0 0 10 2.00 2 5 0 0 0 0 7 1.40 8 14 8 9 26 3 68 13.00 3 14 8 9 26 3 63 12.00 11) 12925 Arrow Rte Incomplete Data Incomplete Data 6) 11800 4th St 7) 11920 Foothill Blvd 8) 12340 Highland Ave 9) 12576 Base Line Rd 10) 12659 Foothill Blvd 1) 10075 Arrow Rte 2) 10477 Lemon Ave 3) 10550 Town Center Dr 4) 11289 Base Line Rd 5) 11768 Foothill Blvd Service Stations - Public Safety Services Analysis 13) 6760 Carnelian St 14) 7287 Archibald Ave 15) 7996 Archibald Ave 16) 8118 Masi Dr 17) 8166 Foothill Blvd (not active) 18) 8514 Vineyard Ave 12) 6539 Milliken Ave Page 842 15 18 12 11 16 1 73 14.40 6 18 12 11 16 1 64 12.60 64 65 81 58 72 8 348 68.00 19 65 81 58 72 8 303 59.00 16 21 23 29 23 9 121 22.40 9 21 23 29 23 9 114 21.00 0 8 12 16 16 1 53 10.40 0 8 12 16 16 1 53 10.40 26 37 38 40 34 4 179 35.00 13 37 38 40 34 4 166 32.40 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.40 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0.40 17 27 35 36 30 1 146 29.00 6 27 35 36 30 1 135 26.80 15 39 31 28 16 0 129 25.80 8 39 31 28 16 0 122 24.40 19 15 11 7 11 2 65 12.60 7 15 11 7 11 2 53 10.20 39 27 26 34 48 4 178 34.80 9 27 26 34 48 4 148 28.80 1 33 24 19 18 5 100 19.00 1 33 24 19 18 5 100 19.00 38 41 59 35 71 11 255 48.80 12 41 59 35 71 11 229 43.60 4 6 7 8 15 0 40 8.00 1 6 7 8 15 0 37 7.40 13 21 14 24 12 0 84 16.80 4 21 14 24 12 0 75 15.00 17 6 39 16 44 5 127 24.40 2 0 8 2 7 1 20 3.80 6 60 99 35 35 3 238 47.00 1 11 10 8 9 0 39 7.80 Color Legend: Calls For Service Reports Prepared 33) 10477 Alta Loma Dr 34) 11108 Foothill Blvd 32) 9888 Foothill Blvd 23) 12280 Highland Ave 24) 8477 Archibald Ave (not active) 25) 8801 Foothill Blvd 26) 8919 Foothill Blvd 27) 6411 Haven Ave 28) 7243 Haven Ave 29) 8687 Base Line Rd 30) 8075 Monet Ave 31) 9524 Foothill Blvd 19) 8777 Haven Ave 20) 8808 Foothill Blvd 21) 9280 Haven Ave 22) 9315 Base Line Rd Page 843 Attachment 5&nbsp;&nbsp;Page 844 1 ORDINANCE NO. _____ AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1.Legislative Findings. A. Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code defines a “service station” as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels.” For the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited to those retail businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this context, a service station is commonly referred to as a gas station. B. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. C. Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities. D. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently in plan check review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations where the service station may become a brownfield site. D. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2 and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. As a matter of environmental justice, the City Page 845 Council must carefully consider how such uses are zoned under the City’s General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue concentration of service stations in any one part of the City. E. Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal activity that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service stations. The development of additional service stations within the City would result in additional strains on police services to counter the potential for increased criminal activity. G. The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed in order to better protect the public. H. Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue to be submitted to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in the City and declining demand. I. The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to 2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility solutions, and alternative fuel options. J. Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by 2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride-sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete. By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their share in the gasoline and diesel markets. K. The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their Page 846 propensity to become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions throughout the City, thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand. L. The City has received applications for additional service stations to be constructed at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. An additional service station to be redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have previously been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet completed plan check and no building permits have been issued. These service station projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with an already high concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending applications for land use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and expand or remodel existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary. M. The City Council finds that the time provided by the moratorium will allow for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations should be permitted. During the moratorium, the City will be able to analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate concentration of service stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in connection with declining demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the Council and the City’s Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that the moratorium will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate regulations and/or appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure positive outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and developers. N. Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to enact this moratorium, new service stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be redeveloped or expanded within the City that do not reflect the demand for such services, are incompatible with neighboring residential areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing public safety issues at service stations. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare exists. Page 847 SECTION 2.Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a reasonable period of time. SECTION 3.Urgency Findings. The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim Urgency Ordinance take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm. SECTION 4.Moratorium Established. A. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium on the approval of applications for the development of new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses. B. No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the same site, shall be approved during the term of the moratorium established herein. C. Nothing contained in this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall preclude the improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition. D. For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service station” shall have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum). Page 848 SECTION 6.Special Conditional Use Permit. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Ordinance, if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that an owner of property subject to the moratorium imposed by this Interim Urgency Ordinance will be deprived of all economically viable use of his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for a service station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires the City to approve an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or use. The special conditional use permit provided by this Section shall be an available entitlement process and permit for a property owner affected by the moratorium whether or not a conditional use permit would otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A special conditional use permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to approving the special conditional use permit. SECTION 7.Enforcement. The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SECTION 8. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will impose a temporary moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any Page 849 one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. SECTION 10. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance. This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in Government Code Section 65858. SECTION 11. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 21st day of April, 2021, by the following vote to wit: AYES: ( ) NOES: ( ) ABSENT: ( ) ABSTAIN: ( ) L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ James L. Markman, City Attorney Page 850 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 1 of 6 ORDINANCE NO. 980 AN INTERIM URGENCY ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Legislative Findings. A.Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code defines a “service station” as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels.” For the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited to those retail businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this context, a service station is commonly referred to as a gas station. B.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. C.Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities. D.There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently in plan check review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations where the service station may become a brownfield site. D.A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2 and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. As a matter of environmental justice, the City Council must carefully consider how such uses are zoned under the City’s General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue concentration of service stations in any one part of the City. E.Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal activity that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has Attachment 2Page851 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 2 of 6 steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service stations. The development of additional service stations within the City would result in additional strains on police services to counter the potential for increased criminal activity. G.The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed in order to better protect the public. H.Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue to be submitted to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in the City and declining demand. I.The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to 2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility solutions, and alternative fuel options. J.Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by 2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride- sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete. By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their share in the gasoline and diesel markets. K.The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their propensity to become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions throughout the City, thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand. L.The City has received applications for additional service stations to be constructed at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. An additional service station to be redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have previously been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet completed plan check and no building permits have been issued. These service station projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with Page 852 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 3 of 6 an already high concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending applications for land use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and expand or remodel existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary. M.The City Council finds that the time provided by the moratorium will allow for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations should be permitted. During the moratorium, the City will be able to analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate concentration of service stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in connection with declining demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the Council and the City’s Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that the moratorium will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate regulations and/or appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure positive outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and developers. N.Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to enact this moratorium, new service stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be redeveloped or expanded within the City that do not reflect the demand for such services, are incompatible with neighboring residential areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing public safety issues at service stations. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare exists. SECTION 2. Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a reasonable period of time. SECTION 3. Urgency Findings. The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim Urgency Ordinance take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm. SECTION 4. Moratorium Established. Page 853 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 4 of 6 A.Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby establishes a moratorium on the approval of applications for the development of new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses. B.No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the same site, shall be approved during the term of the moratorium established herein. C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the moratorium established by this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall not apply to the following: (1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or (2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six months of the moratorium’s effective date. The moratorium shall thereafter apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six-month period. D.For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service station” shall have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum). SECTION 6. Special Conditional Use Permit. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Ordinance, if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that an owner of property subject to the moratorium imposed by this Interim Urgency Ordinance will be deprived of all economically viable use of his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for a service station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires the City to approve an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or use. The special conditional use permit provided by this Section shall be an available entitlement process and permit for a property owner affected by the moratorium whether or not a conditional use permit would otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A special conditional use permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to approving the special conditional use permit. Page 854 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 5 of 6 SECTION 7. Enforcement. The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SECTION 8. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will impose a temporary moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. SECTION 10. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance. This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in Government Code Section 65858. SECTION 11. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law. Page 855 Page 856 Page 1 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council issue the attached report in conformance with California Government Code Section 65858 on the measures taken by the City to alleviate the need for Interim Ordinance No. 980. BACKGROUND: At the regular City Council meeting of March 17, 2021, the City Council directed the City Manager to research and compile information about service stations in the City related to the following topics of concern: The number and location of existing service stations in the city; Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community; Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses; Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential neighborhoods; Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public safety services; Land use policies that will be included in the General Plan update the City is currently preparing and which will be available in draft form within the next month; and Possible performance stations and\/or conditions that could be placed on service station projects in the future. On April 21, 2021 at 4:00 PM, the City Council conducted a special study session during which they received a report prepared by staff that described the impacts of service stations in the City. The City Council then discussed these impacts, the moratorium’s purpose, and the applicability/timing of the moratorium. At their regular meeting at 7:00 PM on that date, the City Council subsequently adopted Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (Attachment 2) establishing an interim urgency zoning Ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, establishing a moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses in the City. The temporary interim urgency ordinance, if not extended, is set to expire on June 5, 2021. DATE:May 5, 2021 TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY:Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Mike Smith, Principal Planner SUBJECT:Report in Conformance with California Government Code Section 65858(D) on Measures Taken to Alleviate the Need for Interim Ordinance No. 980. (CITY) Attachment 3 Page 857 Page 2 7 2 4 ANALYSIS: Section 65858(d) of the California Government Code provides that, “Ten days prior to the expiration of that interim ordinance or any extension, the legislative body shall issue a written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption of the ordinance.” The 10-day report does not modify nor extend the City’s existing moratorium related to service stations. Rather, issuance of the 10-day report satisfies a statutory step in the process to permit the City Council to consider that potential extension at its next regular meeting on June 2, 2021. The following specific activities are currently being undertaken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Ordinance 980. The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and the Development Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design standards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City has also begun the process of identifying updates that will specifically address the development and operation of service stations. In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating whether the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World Class Community.’ Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development, and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into the future. Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result, it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances where a service station may become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they will be updated. A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The purpose of this will be minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the City. The updates to these documents also will include an analysis of the land use compatibility of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of service Page 858 Page 3 7 2 4 stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated by service stations. These topics are both further discussed below; Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City has been generally trending downward. Staff also will be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by service stations in other cities to see how they compare the revenue generated in the City. Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations fiscal performance in this context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost to provide them); Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours. The average amount of time spent on location is about 1,870 hours. The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable manner. Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations. It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations in the City. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24 hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands on public safety resources. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably; Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by: advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to more efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as ridesharing services and mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles with conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future; Page 859 Page 4 7 2 4 Staff is drafting amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations within the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2022. As part of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example, regulate physical requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections and the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating conditions such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and determine what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included with service stations such as the sale of fresh food. As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older, built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with service stations. The above reflect the actions taken since the adoption of Interim Ordinance No. 980. The City Council must issue the attached report that describes these actions in order to extend the interim urgency ordinance currently in effect. An opportunity for full public comment on the extension of Interim Ordinance No. 980 will be provided at the City Council's Public Hearing to be held on June 2, 2021 prior to the City Council’s consideration of an ordinance to extend Interim Ordinance No. 980. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 – 10-Day Report Attachment 2 – Ordinance No. 980 Page 860 REPORT ON THE MEASURES TAKEN TO ALLEVIATE THE CONDITIONS WHICH LED THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ENACT INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 980 ON APRIL 21, 2021, ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ISSUED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ON MAY 5, 2021 PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858(d) On April 5, 2021, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council enacted Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 to impose a moratorium on the approval of building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses. Absent any additional action by the City Council, the Interim Urgency Ordinance will expire after 45 days (June 5, 2021). However, additional time is necessary to thoroughly research and evaluate a permanent, non-urgency ordinance, updates/amendments to General Plan policies and goals, the Zoning Map, and the Development Code establishing land use regulations and technical/design standards on service station development in the City. City staff has therefore scheduled and will notice a public hearing for June 2, 2021, to extend the Interim Urgency Ordinance. Measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980: •The City is currently in the process of updating the General Plan, the Zoning Map, and the Development Code to incorporate appropriate land use regulations and technical/design standards for all types of development within the City. As a part of this effort, the City has also begun the process of identifying updates that will specifically address the development and operation of service stations. In considering land use and zoning provisions for service stations, staff will be evaluating whether the City’s residents and visitors are adequately served by the 32 existing service stations in the City. This will assist in determining whether there is a need for more service stations. Or, if the needs of the City are being met, that the City has reached a saturation point with service stations. As the City becomes more “built-out” there is less vacant land available for development that will fulfill the City Council’s and community’s vision for ‘A World Class Community.’ Thus, the answers to this evaluation also will be critical in shaping the next phase of development, and the pattern of that development, in the City for decades into the future. Most of the remaining vacant land in the City is surrounded by existing development that are considered “sensitive” uses such as residential neighborhoods, schools, and parks. As a result, it has become more important and relevant to consider surrounding uses and context/compatibility when reviewing proposals for service stations. Their location near sensitive uses increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is magnified in instances where a service station may become obsolete and become a “brownfield” site, i.e. a property of which the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance(s), pollutant(s), or contaminant(s). Exposure to the types of contaminants that are present, or are potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring sensitive uses. This outcome is not accounted for in the City’s current land use regulations and, as a result, they will be updated. Attachment 1 Page 861 A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations uses are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. The proliferation of service stations in these areas of the City inequitably increases health risks for the residents of in these locations due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. Under consideration will be where service station uses are designated as a permitted or conditionally permitted use in the City’s General Plan and Zoning Map, and how such uses are regulated in the Development Code. The purpose of this will be minimize the undue concentration of service stations in any one area of the City. The updates to these documents also will include an analysis of the land use compatibility of service stations with sensitive uses. Further analysis will be conducted on the contribution of service stations to the fiscal vitality of the City and demand for public safety services generated by service stations. These topics are both further discussed below; • Staff has begun researching the fiscal impacts of existing service stations in the City. Staff will be evaluating, for example, the sales tax revenue of each of the existing and potential service stations in the City and comparing their fiscal performance with other commercial uses that could potentially be developed on the property. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis, the collective sales tax revenue of the existing service stations in the City has been generally trending downward. Staff also will be researching, for example, the tax revenue generated by service stations in other cities to see how they compare the revenue generated in the City. Note that trends in changing technology may further erode and depress sales tax revenue. As part of staff’s efforts, there will be an evaluation of service stations fiscal performance in this context and whether such uses could become obsolete. Staff will also be evaluating the fiscal performance of service stations relative to the demand on public safety services (and the cost to provide them); • Staff has begun researching the demand for public safety services generated by existing service stations in the City. Based on staff’s preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but thus far there has been 135 calls for service. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service. Similarly, the time spent by deputies on these calls during the same period has increased from about 1,101 hours to about 2,455 hours. The average amount of time spent on location is about 1,870 hours. The number of calls for service and the time spent at service stations cause public safety resources to be used in a likely inefficient and potentially unsustainable manner. Furthermore, service stations draw away an important and critical service from other areas of the City. Including 2021 to date, there has been a combined total of 4,754 calls for service for all service stations. The total calls for service are not equal among the various service stations. It is not yet clear why this disparity exists. As part of the evaluation of the demand for public safety services, staff will reach-out to representatives from the Sheriff’s Department to determine what they believe are the underlying causes for the increase in calls and time spent on location. Staff will also be researching the operating characteristics of all 32 service stations in the City. Staff believes that the disparity in total calls for service may be due to service stations having different operating characteristics. For example, if a service station sells alcohol; is open 24 hours; has accessory uses such as a car wash or a restaurant; or provides services such as vehicle repair, then staff will utilize that information to determine the relationship with demands on public safety resources. If necessary, staff will develop new regulations and standards that will allow public safety resources to be used more efficiently and sustainably; Page 862 • Staff has begun researching how conventional service stations may be affected by: advancements in electric vehicle (EV) technology such as increases in their range due to more efficient batteries; the adoption of EVs as a practical alternative to fossil fuel powered vehicles due to the introduction of chargers that bring the batteries of EVs to a full charge faster or batteries that have the capacity to power heavier vehicles such as trucks; the availability of a variety different mobility options, or the preference for them, such as ridesharing services and mass transit; and new government regulations restricting or prohibiting the sale of vehicles with conventional combustion engines at a specified time in the future; • Staff is drafting amendments to the Development Code, and other relevant documents as necessary, related to technical/design standards and requirements for service stations within the City for consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council by June 30, 2022. As part of this process, staff will be developing new regulations such as those that would, for example, regulate physical requirements such as the number of service stations at street intersections and the minimum distance, or separation, between services stations; regulate operating conditions such as the hours that service stations are open and whether they sell alcohol; and determine what accessory uses or services could (or if the City prefers, should) be included with service stations such as the sale of fresh food. As part of this effort, staff will be reviewing the municipal/development codes of neighboring jurisdictions to determine how they regulate service stations and the technical/design standards that those communities apply to them. Similarly, staff will be researching how older, built-out communities manage service stations within their jurisdictions. When possible, staff will contact their counterparts at these other jurisdictions to discuss their experiences with service stations. Page 863 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 1 of 7 INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. ____ AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ENACTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 EXTENDING FOR AN ADDITIONAL 10 MONTHS AND 15 DAYS, THROUGH APRIL 20, 2022, AN EXISTING MORATORIUM ON THE APPROVAL OF APPLICATIONS FOR BUILDING PERMITS OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS FOR NEW SERVICE STATION USES OR THE EXPANSION OF EXISTING SERVICE STATION USES IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, DECLARING THE URGENCY THEREOF AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Legislative Findings. A.Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code defines a “service station” as a “retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels.” For the purpose of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, a service station shall be limited to those retail businesses selling motor vehicle fuels derived from liquid fossil fuels. In this context, a service station is commonly referred to as a gas station. B.The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has classified service stations and fuel storage locations as uses that may result in a brownfield site. Brownfield sites are properties, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. C.Common contaminants found at service station sites include gasoline, diesel, and petroleum oil, volatile organic compounds and solvents, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and lead. Exposure to the types of contaminants present, or potentially present, at service stations threatens the public health, safety or welfare of neighboring communities. D.There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. There are an additional two more service stations that are currently in plan check review for building permit or under construction. Many of the existing service stations are located near sensitive receptors. The close proximity of service stations to these areas increases the risk of contaminant exposure to vulnerable populations. This problem is exacerbated in situations where the service station may become a brownfield site. D.A disproportionate amount of the City’s existing service stations are concentrated in the southwest and central areas of the City. Thirteen service stations are located in District 2 and eleven are located in District 3. In contrast, Districts 1 and 4 have only five service stations each. The proliferation of service stations in Districts 2 and 3 inequitably increases health risks for the residents of these districts due to the potential contaminants present at service stations. As a matter of environmental justice, the City Council must carefully consider how such uses are zoned under the City’s General Plan and Development Code in order to avoid an undue concentration of service stations in any one part of the City. Attachment 4Page864 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 2 of 7 E. Based on data provided by the Sheriff’s Department, the amount of criminal activity that occurs specifically at service stations necessitates that police services be routinely deployed to service stations. Over the past five years, the number of calls for service at service stations has steadily increased. In 2020, a total of 1,059 calls for service were made at service stations in the City, resulting in approximately 2,455 hours of police time spent policing and protecting service stations. The development of additional service stations within the City would result in additional strains on police services to counter the potential for increased criminal activity. G. The increased criminal activity associated with service stations threatens the health, safety and welfare of all residents, but particularly those within the southwest and central areas of the City, due to the inequitable concentration of service stations in those areas. The City Council believes the location and proliferation of service stations in certain areas of the City requires further regulation to ensure that the negative effects of service stations can be curtailed in order to better protect the public. H. Altogether, the existing location and concentration of service stations in the City mean that drivers need only drive approximately five minutes in order to reach most existing service stations in the City. Applications for additional service stations continue to be submitted to the City despite the already high concentration of service stations in the City and declining demand. I. The declining demand for gasoline is partly demonstrated by the decline in annual service station revenues in the City. According to revenue estimates reported to the City by existing service stations, such revenues have declined by over half a million dollars from 2019 to 2020, echoing global trends, which have seen the decline in service stations over the past ten years due to a variety of factors, including the proliferation of electric vehicles, shared mobility solutions, and alternative fuel options. J. Furthermore, vehicle technology is rapidly evolving such that reliance on gas is steadily declining. According to a report from the Boston Consulting Group, it is estimated that by 2030, more than one third of all new vehicles will be fully or partially electric. Charging for electric vehicles can take place in a variety of locations such as at home, work and in parking lots. Ride- sharing solutions further reduce demand for gasoline as car ownership becomes more obsolete. By 2035, shared mobility solutions such as Uber, Lyft, and Zipcar are expected to account for nearly 20% of on-road passenger miles. Meanwhile, alternative fuel options such as hydrogen fuel, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), compressed natural gas, and biofuels are increasing their share in the gasoline and diesel markets. K. The declining demand for gasoline may increase competition amongst the existing service stations in the City such that closures may occur over time. Due to their propensity to become brownfield sites, service stations require significant investment to remediate any potential ground contamination prior to redevelopment. Closed sites may be abandoned and left unused for years and removal of contaminants may present health risks for neighboring communities and sensitive receptors. Additional closures could result in increased blight and dangerous conditions throughout the City, thereby threatening public health, safety and welfare. The City Council wishes to assess the appropriate concentration and locations of service stations given declining demand. L. There are thirty-two service stations currently in operation in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The City has received applications for additional service stations to be constructed at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue and at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Grove Avenue. The proposed service station at the corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue Page 865 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 3 of 7 was approved by the Planning Commission, but has since been appealed to the City Council. An additional service station to be redeveloped and expanded two blocks north at the corner of Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route and another to be redeveloped at Foothill Boulevard and Red Hill Country Club Drive have previously been approved by the Planning Commission, but have not yet completed plan check and no building permits have been issued. These service station projects would be located within the southwest part of the City, an area with an already high concentration of service stations. Based on all of the foregoing impacts associated with the development of service stations, the City Council therefore finds there is a current and immediate threat to the public health, safety and welfare that is presented by pending applications for land use entitlements and building permits to develop new service stations and expand or remodel existing service stations within the City, and that a moratorium is necessary. M. The City is responsible for adopting and implementing land use regulations within its boundaries. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code generally regulates the entitlement and establishment of service stations within the City, but it does not specify development or operational standards such that the City can mitigate the impacts caused by service stations. N. On April 21, 2021, the City Council approved Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980, which imposed an initial 45-day moratorium on the approval of applications for building permits or other entitlements for new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses during the pendency of the City’s review and adoption of permanent regulations governing service stations. The initial 45-day moratorium is scheduled to expire on June 5, 2021. O. The City Council continues to believe that the time provided by the moratorium will allow for a comprehensive analysis on how to manage and reduce the impact of additional service stations in the City, or if additional service stations or the expansion of existing service stations should be permitted. During the extended period of the moratorium, the City will continue to analyze their potential impacts on the public health such as the potential for contaminant exposure near sensitive receptors and residential areas; impacts on public safety related to the provision of police services to service stations; and impacts on the public welfare due to the disproportionate concentration of service stations in certain residential areas of the City and potential for blight in connection with declining demand for gas. The City Council finds that these studies will help the Council and the City’s Planning Department determine how best to prevent impacts to the public health, safety and welfare. The City Council further finds that this extension will allow time to evaluate the General Plan, the Development Code, and the Zoning map and develop appropriate regulations and/or appropriate zones for service stations in the City to achieve a reasonable level of assurance that there will not be serious negative impacts to the overall community and ensure positive outcomes for the City’s residents, business community, property owners, and developers. P. Based on the foregoing, the City Council ultimately finds that if the City fails to extend the moratorium adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980, then new service stations may be allowed to develop within the City or be redeveloped or expanded within the City that do not reflect the demand for such services, are incompatible with neighboring residential areas and sensitive receptors, and exacerbate existing public safety issues at service stations. Therefore, a current and immediate threat to the public safety, health and welfare remains in existence. Q. A written report describing the measures taken to alleviate the conditions which led to the adoption of the aforementioned Interim Urgency Ordinance was issued by the City Council on May 5, 2021, which was at least ten (10) days prior to the expiration of the Interim Urgency Ordinance on June 5, 2021, in compliance with State law. Page 866 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 4 of 7 R. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858 and 65090, the City Council conducted a duly noticed public hearing on June 2, 2021, at which time the City Council considered this Interim Urgency Ordinance to extend the existing 45-day moratorium on the establishment or expansion of service stations for an additional 10 months and 15 days. SECTION 2. Authority. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858, the City Council may adopt, as an urgency measure, an interim ordinance that prohibits any uses that may be in conflict with a contemplated zoning proposal that the City Council is considering, studying, or intends to study within a reasonable period of time. The City Council may also extend a moratorium adopted pursuant to such an interim ordinance for up to 10 months and 15 days, and subsequently for up to one year, pursuant to Government Code Section 65858(a). SECTION 3. Urgency Findings. The City Council finds and determines that there is an immediate threat to the public health, safety, or welfare, and that new and expanded service station uses within the City, under the City’s current regulations, constitutes a threat to the public health, safety or welfare. As described in Section 1, the staff report accompanying this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and other evidence in the record, such continued service station development in the City could threaten the health, safety and welfare of the community through negative impacts that include, but are not limited to, public safety, contaminant exposure, and police protection services. To preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, the City Council finds that it is necessary that this Interim Urgency Ordinance to extend the current moratorium on service stations take effect immediately pursuant to Government Code Sections 65858, 36934, and 36937 to prevent such harm. SECTION 4. Moratorium Extended. A. Based on the facts and findings set forth in Sections 1 through 3 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, and notwithstanding any other ordinance or provision of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, the City Council hereby extends through and including April 20, 2022, the existing moratorium on the approval of applications for the development of new service station uses or the expansion of existing service station uses, adopted pursuant to Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 (the “Moratorium”). B. No application for a building permit or any other entitlement, including a design review or conditional use permit, authorizing construction of a new service station use or the expansion of an existing service station use, including the expansion of accessory uses on the same site, shall be approved during the term of the Moratorium. C. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Moratorium shall not apply to the following: (1) The improvement, renovation, or demolition of an existing service station, provided that such development otherwise conforms to applicable law, does not result in an increase to the number of gas pumping facilities, does not add any new accessory uses on site, and does not require a discretionary entitlement to perform such improvement, renovation, or demolition; or (2) An application for a service station that has been deemed complete or received all discretionary entitlements as of the moratorium’s effective date, provided that the City has issued a building permit for construction or redevelopment of the proposed service station within six Page 867 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 5 of 7 months of the Moratorium’s initial effective date of April 21, 2021. The Moratorium shall thereafter apply to these applications if a building permit has not been issued within that six-month period. D. For the purposes of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the term “service station” shall have the same meaning prescribed in Subsection F(9) of Section 17.32.020 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that it shall be limited to retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels derived from fossil fuels (e.g., petroleum). SECTION 6. Special Conditional Use Permit. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, the City of Rancho Cucamonga may accept, process and approve applications for special conditional use permits for development or use of property otherwise subject to Section 4 of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, if the City Council finds, after receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission, that an owner of property subject to the Moratorium will be deprived of all economically viable use of his or her land unless the property owner is allowed to develop or use the property for a service station, or that the law of California or of the United States otherwise requires the City to approve an application for a permit or an entitlement for the development or use. The special conditional use permit provided by this Section shall be an available entitlement process and permit for a property owner affected by the Moratorium whether or not a conditional use permit would otherwise be required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. A special conditional use permit submitted pursuant to this Section shall be processed in accordance with Chapter 17.14 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, except that the City Council shall serve as the final decision-making body, which shall make the additional findings required by this Section prior to approving the special conditional use permit. SECTION 7. Enforcement. The provisions of this Interim Urgency Ordinance shall be enforceable pursuant to the general enforcement provisions in Title 1 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. SECTION 8. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance may have a significant effect on the environment, because the Interim Urgency Ordinance will extend an existing temporary moratorium on approvals of applications for service station uses in the City in order to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, and will thereby serve to avoid potentially significant adverse environmental impacts during the term of the moratorium. It is therefore not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act review pursuant to Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Code of Regulations. SECTION 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Interim Urgency Ordinance or its application to any person or circumstances, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Interim Urgency Ordinance, or its application to any other person or circumstance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, Page 868 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 6 of 7 clause, phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable. SECTION 10. Effective Date; Approval and Extension of Ordinance. This Interim Urgency Ordinance, being adopted as an urgency measure for the immediate protection of the public safety, health, and general welfare, containing a declaration of the facts constituting the urgency, and passed by a minimum four-fifths (4/5) vote of the City Council, shall take effect immediately upon its adoption and shall continue in effect for a period of not longer than forty-five (45) days. After notice pursuant to Government Code Section 65090 and a public hearing, the City Council may extend the effectiveness of this Urgency Ordinance as provided in Government Code Section 65858. SECTION 11. Term. This Interim Urgency Ordinance shall take effect concurrent with the expiration of Urgency Ordinance No. 980 at midnight on June 5, 2021, and shall remain in effect for a period of ten (10) months, fifteen (15) days, through and including April 20, 2022, in accordance with California Government Code Section 65858. SECTION 12. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Interim Urgency Ordinance and shall cause its publication in accordance with applicable law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of June, 2021. . _____________________________ L. Dennis Michael, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ) I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Interim Urgency Ordinance was passed and adopted by a 4/5 vote at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the 21st day of April, 2021, by the following vote: Page 869 Interim Urgency Ordinance No. 980 - Page 7 of 7 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: Executed this __ day of June 2021, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. _________________________________ Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________________ James L. Markman, City Attorney Page 870 Interim Moratorium -Service Stations City Council June 2, 2021 Background •Recent increase in the number of applications for service station uses •Recent increase in the number of requests to add alcohol sales to existing service stations •Noticeable concentration of service station requests in Cucamonga Neighborhood •Concerns with long-term impacts on land use, the environment, and economic development •Concerns with benefits of service stations versus potential impacts to neighborhoods •Four applications for service stations currently under review -all located in Cucamonga Neighborhood Background (continued) Direction received from the City Council to conduct an analysis on service stations in the City as follows: •The number and location of existing service stations in the City •Analysis of the land use benefits of service station to the community •Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and comparison to other retail uses •Land use impacts of service stations on surrounding commercial districts and residential neighborhoods •Fiscal impacts to City for providing public safety services at service stations •Land use policies implemented through the General Plan update •Potential performance standards, conditions, that could be placed on future service stations Definition of a Service Station In the Development Code, a "service station" is defined as follows: F. 9. Service station.A retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels. May include a convenience store. Vehicle services which are incidental to fuel services are included under Vehicle services, minor. F.11.Vehicle services, minor.Minor facilities specialize in limited aspects of repair and maintenance (e.g., muffler and radiator shops, quick-lube, smog check, and tires). Does not include repair shops that are part of a vehicle dealership on the same site (see Auto and vehicle sales) or automobile dismantling yards, which are included under Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling. CARTILLA AVELocation of Gas Stations Quantity by District •District 1 –5 stations •District 2 –13 stations •District 3 –11 stations* •District 4 –5 stations 34 Gas Stations Total 23 currently sell alcohol *most recent approval in 2011 –Ralph’s on Haven Ave CARTILLA AVEDriving Time to Gas Stations 5-minute drive time Public Safety Service Calls Analysis N Service Stations -Public Safety Services Analysis TOTAL CALLS FOR SERVICE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE At Service Stations 637 910 1034 979 1059 Incomplete Data 923.8 City Overall 146,254 159,059 155,537 151,562 142,344 150,951 Percentage of Calls at Service Stations Relative to the City (overall) 0.44%0.57%0.66%0.65%0.74%0.61% TIME SPENT ON LOCATION (HOURS)2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 5 YEAR AVERAGE At Service Stations 1,100.75 1,867.44 1,982.12 1,946.32 2,455.44 Incomplete Data 1,870.41 City Overall 158,217. 34 227,420. 26 220,288. 82 231,371. 81 216,508. 65 210,761.38 Percentage of Time at Service Stations Relative to the City (overall) 0.70%0.82%0.90%0.84%1.13%0.88% City Population Data •2015:175,232 •2016:176,540 •2017:177,446 •2018:177,742 •2019:177,614 CARTILLA AVEService Calls for Gas Stations Future Analysis of Correlation between Service Calls and the following factors: •Locations, Zoning Designations •Hours of Operation •24-Hour Operation •Alcohol sales •Other items Annual Sales Tax Revenue Analysis 2008 through 2020 N $- $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $3.00 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020Millions Year Annual Sales Tax Revenue 2008 $2,041,400.68 2009 $1,615,184.14 2010 $1,868,335.21 2011 $2,238,239.53 2012 $2,426,457.82 2013 $2,261,404.95 2014 $2,244,070.71 2015 $2,049,208.59 2016 $1,768,133.12 2017 $1,816,753.47 2018 $2,031,354.18 2019 $2,194,465.74 2020 $1,496,374.00 •Comprehensive update to both documents underway •Evaluation of goals/policies, regulations, related to existing and future land uses •Existing regulations don’t adequately address potential impacts of service stations o Minimal performance standards in place o Non-discretionary review in some zones –CUPs not always required o Outdated definition in development code •Environmental Impacts resulting from long term use, fuel storage o Brownfield Sites •Major streets and intersections identified as sites for gateway development •Environmental Justice perspective o Regulations and permitting process; avoid undue concentration Analysis -General Plan & Development Code Update Summary -Operational Impacts •34 service stations in the City: o 32 active o 2 inactive, under redevelopment •Concentration compared to neighboring cities: o Fontana –21 stations o Ontario –20 stations o Upland –17 stations •Disproportionate concentration within the Southwest and Central areas of the City: o Northwest –5 stations (4 active, 1 inactive) o Southwest –13 stations (12 active,1 inactive) o Central –11 stations o North, East –5 stations Summary -Fiscal Impacts •Recent decline in demand, sales tax generated o Apparent decline in demand for gasoline o Apparent decline in demand for certain products o Competitive ride sharing options; increase in electric vehicle use •Potential decline due to alternative energy sources o Increased acceptance of electric vehicles leading to the use of charging stations and the need for more charging station locations o Hydrogen, liquid petroleum gas, natural gas, biofuels are more readily available •Significant investment to remediate former gas station/brownfield sites o Potential ground contamination; inactive sites left abandoned/unused; potential health risks •Public Safety Fiscal Impacts o Demand for services •Calls for service seeing increase since 2016: o 637 calls in 2016 o 1,059 calls in 2020 •Average of 924 calls for service per year •Time spent on calls for service seeing increase since 2016 o 1,101 hours in 2016 o 2,455 hours in 2020 o Average of 1,870 hours spent on site between 2016 and 2020 •Combined calls for service for all service stations since 2016 –4,754 Summary -Fiscal Impacts (continued) Next Steps Staff will: •Collect additional information, conduct further analysis of data •Research options for amendments to the Development Code and/or the Zoning Map regarding service stations •Prepare recommendations to the City Council •The existing moratorium, if approved for an extension by adoption of the interim urgency ordinance tonight, would expire in 10 months and 15 days (on April 20, 2022) Staff recommends the adoption of Urgency Ordinance No. 981 entitled "An Urgency Zoning Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Enacted Pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 Establishing a Moratorium on The Approval of Applications for Building Permits or other Entitlements for New Service Station Uses or the Expansion of Existing Service Station Uses in the City of Rancho Cucamonga", by four- fifths vote, waive full reading, and read by title only. Staff Recommendation Unmanned Aerial Data Collection Device UAS Program Development Timeline 2015 UAS Purchased 2016 -Ground/Flight School -FAA Approval in foothills 2017 FAA Approvals: -Class C -Night Ops. -Over People 2018 FLIR Camera Purchased Ground & Flight School First Field Exercises, Class G Airspace Hazardous Materials Arson & Bomb Investigation Technical Rescue Etiwanda Preserve Night Operations Forward Looking Infra-Red Unified Command Post Pilot (UASP) Data Specialist (UASD) Manager (UASM) Module Leader (UASL)