Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutTrail Agendas 2011 -2013I TRAILS AGENDAS' Janua� ',12; 2011 1�ennber ! `1-13 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 119 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 5, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA JLS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA NOVEMBER 13, 2013 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 6:05 P.M. Rich Fletcher X Ray Wimberly X Janet Ryerson X Candyce Burnett X Bill Pallotto X Carol Douglass (Equestrian) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle) X Lou Munoz (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ II II. PRESENTATIONS III A. WEST SIDE DISTRICTS AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services, gave a PowerPoint presentation. Following a general discussion, she explained that if these actions are approved, the new districts will directly benefit. II III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT III 6:38 P.M. 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 6, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA NOVEMBER 13, 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Rich Fletcher_ Ray Wimberly _ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto _ Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Lou Munoz (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ II II. PRESENTATIONS III A. WEST SIDE DISTRICTS AND STREET LIGHTING DISTRICTS 11 III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. II IV. ADJOURNMENT III 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 6, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA OCTOBER 9, 2013 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 2, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA ILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA SEPTEMBER 11, 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO UCAMONG Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 6:04 PM Rich Fletcher A Ray Wimberly X Janet Ryerson X Candyce Burnett X Bill Pallotto A Carol Douglass (Equestrian) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle) X Lou Munoz (Alternate) X Kelly Matheny (Alternate) A II. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of the Community Recreation Needs Assessment Francie Palmer, Community Services Marketing Manager gave a PowerPoint presentation. B. Presentation and Discussion Regarding Rest Stops Along the Pacific Electric Trail Donna Finch, Management Analyst I and Walt Stickney, Associate Engineer shared locations of existing and proposed rest stops along the trail. The Committee discussed and considered the following points: Each rest stop would cost approximately $4, 000-$5, 000 consisting of the following approximate costs:. Public works will pour 17'X8' slabs, a total of 5 slabs for $8, 250. The installation of metal benches (not concrete) for $1, 550 per bench and trash containers for $1,100 + $600 shipping was another noted cost. Commissioner Munoz asked for a time frame for the completion of the improvements. Mr. Stickney said quotes will have to be obtained from the vendors and they will be asked to fix their quotes for a 2-year window. Carol Douglass noted that horse waterers/tie ups are not noted on the plan and they should be 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA SEPTEMBER 119 2013 added to the map and additional costs. Mr. Stickney noted that bike racks are not needed and therefore should be removed from the standard provisions. Vicky Jones mentioned a need for pet stations. Mr. Stickney said they could be added on a case by case basis and would not be at all the stops. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS _::]I This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 7: 36 PM 2 of 2 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 111 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO UCAMONG Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Rich Fletcher_ Ray Wimberly _ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Lou Munoz (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II. NEW BUSINESS A. Presentation of the Community Recreation Needs Assessment B. Presentation and Discussion Regarding Rest Stops Along the Pacific Electric Trail III. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 5, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 2013 Community Recreation Needs Assessment Findings and Analysis Presented by the Park and Recreation Commission Subcommittee & Community Services Department „® v Conducted by: GreenPlay LLC NEEDS ASSESSMENT PURPOSE *To conduct a Statistically Valid Survey that provides a community's recreation needs, attitudes, opinions and behaviors. -A formal Assessment provides one opportunity for data collection in the first phase of the development of a Park and Recreation Master Plan. It serves as one foundation for long range planning initiatives, visioning out 10-15 years. -The last time a Recreation Needs Assessment was conducted in Rancho Cucamonga. was in 2000/2001.a, POPULATION & PROGRESS 2001A nA , n� Pnnulation0oe r 1 • 29.4% population growth *Enhanced program offerings and services for youth, adults and seniors *Completed several capital projects related to priorities identified in 2001 — First phase of Central Park (including new Senior and Community Centers) — Victoria Gardens Cultural Center — Development of additional neighborhood parks. -Elimination of Redevelopment Agency I= RECREATION CUSTOMERS • 63.74% Repeat Rate (benchmark= 30-50%) Generational Break Down • 37.83% of paid registration customers 11 and younger • 10.0% Seniors • 13.5% Baby Boomers • Based on analysis by Learning Resources Network (LERN) of 2012 Registration data PROJECT BACKGROUND & TIMELINE •A Community Recreation Needs Assessment was identified as a City Council Goal for the 2012/2013 Fiscal Year as the first step in developing a Park & Recreation Master Plan. -July, 2012 an internal multi -department project team was formed, which included a subcommittee of two Park and Recreation Commissioners. MULTI -DEPARTMENT TEAM • Public Works Services • City Manager's Office • Library Services • Animal Services • Purchasing/Administrative Services Rancho Cucamonga, CA Community Needs Assessment Needs Assessment Presentation 7122/13 RRC ASSOCIATES RANCHOCUCAMONGA Community Services Today's Agenda ■ Demographics ■ Inventory ■ Public Input Process ■ Survey Result Highlights 200,700 1 R0.10A 160,300 1401)00 120,)00 100.000 30,)00 60,)00 40,)00 20,300 Demographic Analysis Population 2000 2010 20.2 2011 US Census (2000 and 2010 ) and ESRI Projections 2000 Population 127,777 2010 Population 165,269 2012 Estimated 167,903 2017 Projected 175,256 Demographic Analysis • The median age in Rancho Cucamonga in 2012 was 34.6 compared to 32.2 in 2000. The median income for Rancho Cucamonga was $61,022 in 2000, and according to ESRI estimates, it was $76350 in 2ot2. The highest ranking educational cohorts in Rancho Cucamonga are those with some college education and no degree (28.9 percent) and high school graduates (21.6 percent) Census Age Demographic Analysis 16.0% 14.0% 12.0% 10.996 8.0% O Rancho Cucamonga 6 0% ■ CA& rnia Q Unite d States 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0-4 5-9 1.0- 15- 20- 25- 35- 45- 55- 65- 75- 85+ 14 19 24 34 44 54 64 74 84 Inventory Analysis (Quantitative) Availability to the Residents of Rancho Cucamonga 2000 vs. 2012 Rancho Cucwnon CA �MMmm�maeamammaama rrr► mom©m�aaama®®soma -- Vf� L-,P- i2�v� _. M 7 d LL N � c � � QQ d „ Total 10 2 10 19 127 777 POPULATION 20W Population er each com onent 12,778 63 889 12.778 6,725 77 4 % _ Total 10 2� 12 25 POPULATION 2010 167,903 %Increase 31.40Ye 0.00% 0.00% 20.00% 31.58% Po ulation Per each component 16,790 83 952 13.992 6 716 Percent Change Per Population per each component From 2000 to 2012 -31.40% -31.40% 9.50% 0.13% j n , ,i n' , i .Mr- U n School Field Additions (2000 to 2012) Elementary Schools 12 — practice soccer fields 3 — overlay soccer fields 9 — practice baseball/softball fields Middle Schools 5 — practice soccer fields 1— overlay soccer field 1— practice overlay football field 2 — practice softball fields High Schools 5 — practice softball fields 2 — game football fields 2 — overlay football fields r � s d o - d > 77 6 4 28 1 77 7.777 Po ulation Rer each com onent 1 21296 31944 1 4 S63 127 777 jwwow x.. 7-7 �: Total 10 4 28 7 f , POPULATION 2010 167,903, %Increase 31.40% 66.67% 0.00% 0.00% 600.00% Po ulation per each component' 16 790 41.976 5 997 23,986 Percent Change Per Population per each component From 2000 to 2012 21.16%1 -31.40% -31.40% 81.23% Vculc.tj - Focus Groups/Public Meetings • 93 Participants attended focus groups and public meetings representing interests from - Friends of the Pacific Electric Trail - Rancho Cucamonga Community & Arts Foundation - Rancho Cucamonga Library Foundation - Senior Advisory Group - Sports Advisory Group - Trails & Equestrian Interests MindMixer Online Communi Engagement Tool. Statistically -Valid Community Survey • 462 completed (340 via mail, 122 online) - 9.2% return (average is 5-15%) • loo completed telephone surveys • 300 completed surveys = a valid sampling • 562 completed surveys @ 95% confidence level (±4.3%) • The survey results were statistically weighted to reflect the demographic profile (age, income, household status) so the results represent the make- up of Rancho Cucamonga. 11 Respondents Household Characteristics Single, no children Single, with children at home Single, children no longer at home (empty nester) Couple, no children Couple, with children at home Couple, children no longer at home Respondents Household Characteristics 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65 - 74 75 or older Age of Respondent Average Median 44.8 Years 43.0 Years dents Household Characteristics Under $2.5,000;, 49 999 1% $50,000 - $74,999 20% $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000- $149,999 22 { $150,000 - $199,999 Vi 1 $200,000 or more 4 "Even though my family does not use everything that is provided, I appreciate all the options available" ImPOrt—al Cutfwrt Prog— and FAdfMMs (A~W PMlr4d CAy Parks(P.LWv—d%.hA.,) Cry libraries and fk+MmabM 4,2 Cry va:h 1.2 Cky ANmal Care and Adoption Ce Chy.nhkitJvp t fwW 31 $Pedal use fasBuks/uex (state part. deg 1 1�y1IIyY��1�yy�p++-- ti Padr, Coiram-r stadium —,mortal CiIY Perlamhg Orb Carver .I•ota Family j ff f: ��I .� f City sports poy'amr/tiasse (ail y 1 .. ' J $ i Ciryrareafxw prayannhbsxs aduh ��$ ryr—im Pfew mr/"— 3S wxps .�� Itardr Cwmr"a Farm, Somt c a ;I Gry rareahon yrograms/clx t ag a CRy ra 1-0. pograms/cia— - y—h City aAt—ww."/dasaa( Il g.) Gry TxC to it ;. t.'- Cltyrosy 111-Prognmsidassas t { ' ; Page 8 CRYem�amian rx leks � � ,` I «ha ' A . Aawep bq I Note Wrdl CWratd P"Wer is and fadldaa � MMlft lbtaaelMd "aada I*~W Rating) Oty Ubrarles aM Ibot bik CRY Parts (Playgrounds, s6altrrc( Qytralb Coy P.J. nr,g Arts Cmta - Lawn F-J' Playhouse Cby Ar nW (— and Adnlrrtm Carver CM athW.k/sppts fries $pecW ve faritties/aeas (skare park, doe Prt, Fpcatta sradwmt, tame comb) CRY retlexwm Plog —Jdas—. youth Gry ra —wn Vrogra ms(r User City ranenwm ww.—/clas—. swum. R—fr sCuummtgaF-OVSo.tsc— City —union p(ograms/clasyas tm all yes City racr.atism pngiams/rA.ss+n adtdt CRY .Ports Pmgram4dxsn ia9 yavl C'rtyTron Cwrta Oly alcastrfan fadlkim Chy aruatics Programs/dassas iav ages) Odrr "Generally I like the "Level of Service" provided." currwK programs and Faciltiles — importance &&d% et Matrix - Random Sample overall ac 4.75 High importance and meeting Nperaxpefr.x+i.: + Of mc Lofrrhrddnsadsetirro motthe itt.' household needs of the City: ('ny Pnls - . S ( -City parks cnrp}paf,aJeeuimobs! -City trails AthW*sportsPAO* -City libraries l DPW OF nr W -Animal Care Center scor+E ".' AR -Lewis Family Playhouse Agpatid IAs psi "`°' Rue Y°""' . -Special use facilities Kat: pltoa-/WAton i -City athletic fields rtacr ; 2.5 Lo%er. 'Laxwtlwat alifflaQM 0lklO tnk:. ..,•.. .Oi w , 3.5 How well needs are currently being met (average rating) 4.75 Page u R••sals Why FodNJn we Not Used by NolnAcfd• Npinieree[in �siay ` � ��- No 6me/other personae i' (e g.AwiM } mo6drtrl Natawaredprognms -Okiet offered l6% ( y� `""°"W� °""*h"Ce Couples/Single parents Safety and sxu^r T*,p„ �.: .., �,., with children tended to indicate . this more often. l f lack d ferilkin and ameNt � 6% _ 1 7 Need nmr<renroomsJIM0% ..i s laskdlranspnsati -6% 1: I Indicates high level of °•"^•^�',i��.med"` '' satisfaction for condition of D.h.-dieprogramsi-qnt � !; .E � facilities Prehr odter r stion gwiden U.kotparbng 3 AccecaiMhty � 31F i 5 � 1 Nonen tV 2%! 1 4ualkrM ewipinant needs improrerrem4. Page r3 Crnlomer senire/staN knowledge 7% , '; Ott 41 tplt IS% ]Olr aeY tUl )SR Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Average Rating) Indoorchildren's discovery center/interactive museum (2nd Floor of Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water Additional library space Additional community use spaces (youth, teen, adult, and/or senior) Additional weight room and cardio fitness space Additional multi -purpose gymnasium space Additional fitness class space Other Page t5 1.0 15 2.0 25 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Other Indoor Facilities • Additional Senior Center space • More adult armchairs at Archibald Library • Recreation Center • Soccer Complex w/ synthetic turf • Fitness classes to fight childhood obesity lmpwienco of OUTDOOR Fodlltln to M Added, Expanded, or Improved (Avewp Ratlfy) Canal.<e csnuY rry 40 shade trurturea Invµ ).9 x rrW anrwctipru wnh:tnmrdxd t.rcemorbn 313 - chttdoa swi. iN pool for r eimw wrpoeva It— 3 to sw:a aogr�w, wercrh[nes� recruUonel open tenml ' cornmunnr aerxndu�ven.pw.unure .�� 3.6 pe>tioml nad mnnecuon+nunlAe parM+a [pnnwny 3S -i NMaebned fwilhies (e6, oxtdoarMueJ'm"etive central � � -t. Pink le M-, (tMlm MwL—, Herten) Mi i W-fj.1d ..Ore(1-0MW) 3S C'ommunuy �therine weCcirpNdoar evml � 3A ( . hryiemoltithmmr 'f ; New Weyywnds ��33 (SedtatbdxcwrtP lh�tedl 3.� �¢� Outdoor fitrreaeaip^t NpµP aC tYh) ki f' E"W yrkina n City perla end fwdpdeP 3,k new vµ in wuth . W.. 3.1 sd..n P.W-er band opn.wceHwweeebved .e.r ��'3.1 .wdtlm W dog pwtfil .316 Adii6wO tenrw. carp tllyhted) s I 4.0.' 1-0 13 iA 1.5 >0 13 •A eS SA Page 19 Other Outdoor Facilities • More parks in Southwest RC — Need more than one • Soccer fields • Aquatics park • Central Park handicapped parking Most important Fadlky/Park Options to be Developed Complete Central park Trails and trail connectivity Focus on maintaining what we have Chldren's discovery center/interactive museum Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Improve existing parks/community centers city facilities Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Mufti -sports field complex Improve existing Equestrian Center Gymnasium Page 21o% 5% 20% IS% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% p.nm of mouaah" W Most Important Second Most Important (Com6ined)Top Ttw Specific trail linkages within Rancho Cucamonga, frequently mentioned: aEtiwanda Preserve -More North/South Trails -More neighborhood connections -Victoria Gardens connections -Connections to Pacific Electric Trail Page 28 Top Th— Most Impeabmprovem.,Actl.In.a.&WSped.IE. hmw AMW. E,.p &d. or a pond 0— Nut R. Teen S-61— le.,,oiuertaln,m'a, in - a.'4 roundeea Porade. firewa.Ya, ts+,wnmN:elebedom) Tana„ aM rraan.a, 1*ap�^ Em�.onrnent Wnmre p,grems cine,al edrrtN.. 61ea alvnb.ImmWler,, fdtil3arJ,ad, .�,.da.,;aan..aan) Ee+m ta.w4nugrum leNl, famN PYyMu,e aM r.rarypropariwatt I famN.,ao.n. e.nr eoan..pa.ram. reea.rti.e:n Sumrcrday camp .wawddllo.d�afY e Mast Imporrrrc ' Second M.W h Pp M a Tlvrd Mo 11Wdaro (CwrBirdJ lap Itnw Healthy RC Through the dedicated efforts of city staff, community partners and volunteers, Healthy RC is developing a wide range of programs, policies, infrastructure and events to help build and maintain healthy minds, health bodies and a clean and sustainable earth. Impact on Loss of RDA Funding • For Rancho Cucamonga the elimination of redevelopment equates to an annual loss of approximately $90 million in funding. • RDA is currently the source of funding for the Lease for the RC Family Sports Center • The current Lease agreement, which has an annual cost of approximately $360,000, expires in 2017. • Prior to the expiration of the Lease the City will need to consider how to provide recreation programming that is currently being provided at the RC Family Sports Center. Bast and Current Methods of Re"Ivins Communication The Grapevine/Rancho Reporter City E-mail (Listsetve) City of Rancho Cucamonga website Posters/flyers Other Internet/websites Local newspaper Social networking (i a Twitter, Facebook) At the recreation facilitles/program location RC cable TV channel (RCN) Lewis Family Playhouse Season Brochure Digital billboards 0% 10% 10% 30% 40% 50% 50% M% a0% 90% 100% Page 32 i P�rantdHouwholds ■ Best Method ■ Current Method Draft Report Available @ www.RCpark.COM Community Services Department (909) 477-2760 _ .:_ i Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 1) Household Status Single, no children 2i% a. Single, with children at home 8%_ � _ k Single, children no longer at home (empty nester) 496, .` Couple, no children 11%. Couple, with children at home 33% Couple, children no longer at home (empty nester) 25% In Need of ADA Accessible Facilities Yes No Don't know F112% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent Responding ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 1 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Average/Median Numbers ■ Total Random 5ample RRC Associates 2 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 3) Number of Dogs in Average 1.3 Median 1.0 , .. . Number of Cats in Average 1.2 Household is Median 1.0 Number of Horses in Average 1.0. Household Median 1.0 Number of Other Average 1:3 Animals in Household Median 1.0 0 0.5 1 1.5 Average/Median Numbers ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 3 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Household Characteristics (Part 4) - Percentage of Households with at Least One Animal Dogs Cats Horses Other Animals 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of Households ■ TOTAL RANDOM SAMPLE RRC Associates Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Respondent Characteristics Length of Time Less than 1 year 1% length of Time Living In Rancho 1- 5 years 10% Average Median Cucamonga 6 -10 years 13% . 20.4 Years19.5 Years 11-15 years 21'Yo 16 - 20 years it%. 21- 30 years 2496' 31- 40 years 10%-; '- 41- 50 years 7% 51 or more years 1% Axe of Respondent 18 - 24 12%; 25 - 34 21% " ; 35 - 44 22%.' 45 - 54 16% Age of Respondent 55 - 64 1s% Average Median 65 - 74 796 44.8 Years43.0 Years 75 or older 6% Gender Male 3690 . Female 64% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent Responding ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 5 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage of Households Who Used Current Programs and Facilities at Least Once In Past 12 Months City parks (playgrounds, shelters) City trails City Libraries and Bookmobile se facilities/areas (skate park, dog park, Epicenter stadium, tennis courts) City Animal Care and Adoption Center City athletic/sports fields i Performing Arts Center - Lewis Family Playhouse y recreation programs/classes - all ages combined City recreation programs/classes - adult City sports programs/classes - (all ages) City recreation programs/classes - seniors City recreation programs/classes - youth Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center City equestrian facilities City aquatics programs/classes (all ages) City recreation programs/classes - teen City Teen Center Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% SO% 60% 70% 80% 90% Percent of Households ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 7 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of Current Programs and Facilities (Average Rating) City parks (playgrounds, shelters) City Libraries and Bookmobile City trails City Animal Care and Adoption Center City athletic/sports fields ;pecial use facilities/areas (skate park, dog park, Epicenter stadium, tennis courts) lerforming Arts Center - Lewis Family Playhouse City sports programs/classes (all ages) City recreation programs/classes - adult City recreation programs/classes - seniors Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center City recreation programs/classes for all ages City recreation programs/classes - youth City aquatics programs/classes (all ages) City Teen Center City recreation programs/classes - teen City equestrian facilitie Othei 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 8 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of Current Programs and Facilities (Percent Important vs. Not Important) City parks (playgrounds, shelters) City trails City Libraries and Bookmobile City athletic/sports fields City Animal Care and Adoption Center ty Performing Arts Center - Lewis Family Playhouse ise facilities/areas (skate park, dog park, Epicenter stadium, tennis courts) City sports programs/classes (all ages) City recreation programs/classes - adult City recreation programs/classes - seniors City recreation programs/classes for all ages City aquatics programs/classes (all ages) Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center City recreation programs/classes - youth City Teen Center City recreation programs/classes - teen City equestrian facilities Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 90% 90% 100% Percent of Households ■ Important (4 or 5) ■ Not Important (1 or 2) RRC Associates 9 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Current Programs and Facilities are Meeting Household Needs (Average Rating) City Libraries and Bookmobile City parks (playgrounds, shelters) City trails 'erforming Arts Center - Lewis Family Playhouse City Animal Care and Adoption Center City athletic/sports fields special use facilities/areas (skate park, dog park, Epicenter stadium, tennis courts) City recreation programs/classes - youth City recreation programs/classes - teen City recreation programs/classes - seniors Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center City recreation programs/classes for all ages City recreation programs/classes - adult City sports programs/classes (all ages) City Teen Center City equestrian facilities City aquatics programs/classes (all ages] Othei 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 10 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Current Programs and Facilities are Meeting Household Needs (Percent Neec City Libraries and Bookmobile City parks (playgrounds, shelters) City trails City athletic/sports fields City Animal Care and Adoption Center City recreation programs/classes - teen City recreation programs/classes - youth y Performing Arts Center - Lewis Family Playhouse ise facilities/areas (skate park, dog park, Epicenter stadium, tennis courts) City recreation programs/classes - seniors City recreation programs/classes - adult Rancho Cucamonga Family Sports Center City recreation programs/classes for all ages City sports programs/classes (all ages) City equestrian facilities City Teen Center City aquatics programs/classes (all ages) Other 1'17D. 4/ 73% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%_100% Percent of Households ■ Important (4 or 5) ■ Not Important (1 or 2) RRC Associates 11 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 4.75 O t O t M C E A 0 ocop 14 a uCU a A f0 N O u yC L O a E 2.5 Current Programs and Faciltiies — Importance vs. Needs -Met Matrix - Random Sample Overall RiIN �mpOrtgtlCN a► iowar Anro) of heeds �Ing met cneids ji itkd ^t F L 5 L i �CftyTtaliB f a �ity.tlb�dCies%8o�kin bill %aF - � 3 t "INAPO(ifANCir. Ret P;cgdutcjiwRATIN is Family Piayfiouse iKquatic5 Frog AS Ages i �� i�ai�y ctr Y4 rT M. �.�.�,,, y�� - _ V. "� :V f..f)YIeC. /Il .: .#Z`F.,..✓ ._:..x e..F ..� .;'.n. ZY *'n ,]..s� . �...x Afzi,�..'�YY�1e'.lfliWlKlifl7 '�c�._ . 3.5 4./ How well needs are currently being met (average rating) RRC Associates 12 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Reasons Why Facilities are Not Used by Households No interest in using other personal issues (e g, health, mobility) Not aware of programs/facilities offered Crowding/not enough space Safety and security Price/user fees Lack of facilities and amenities Need more restrooms Lack of transportation Hours of operation Overall maintenance needs improvement Don't have the programs I want Prefer other recreation providers Lack of parking Accessibility Condition of facilities None nearby Quality of equipment needs improvement Customer service/staff knowledge 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Percent of Households ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 13 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Other Facilities Used by Households National Forest Private health and fitness clubs County Parks & Open Space Churches Private or public schools ?ation facilities and centers in neighboring cities Private instruction (dance, martial arts, etc ) None of the above lomeowners Associations/apartment facilities & amenities YMCA/YWCA Others 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Percent of Households ■ Total Random Sample 11 RRC Associates 14 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Average Rating) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum (2nd Floor of Biane Library) Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Additional library space Additional community use spaces (youth, teen, adult, and/or senior) Additional weight room and cardio fitness space Additional multi -purpose gymnasium space Additional fitness class space Other 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 15 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Percent Important vs. Not Important) ndoor children's discovery center/interactive museum (2nd 639b Floor of Biane Library) Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Additional library space dditional community use spaces (youth, teen, adult, and/or senior) Additional weight room and cardio fitness space Additional fitness class space Additional multi -purpose gymnasium space Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% M 70% Percent of Households ■ Important (4 or 5) ■ Not Important (1 or 2) RRC Associates 16 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next S Years Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum (2nd Floor of Biane Library) Additional library space Additional community use spaces (youth, teen, adult, and/or senior) Additional fitness class space Additional weight room and cardio fitness space Additional multi -purpose gymnasium space Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■ Most Important °n Second Most Important ■ Third Most Important (Combined) Top Three RRC Associates 17 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important INDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next 5 Years - Open Link Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Indoor children's discovery center/interactive museum (2nd Floor of Biane Library) Additional library space Additional weight room and cardio fitness space Additional community use spaces (youth, teen, adult, and/or senior) Additional multi -purpose gymnasium space Additional fitness class space Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Most Importont ■ Second Most Important ■Third Most Important (Combined) Top Three RRC Associates 18 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Average Rating) Complete Central Park Shade structures in park Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Community gardens/urban agriculture Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga Nature -based facilities (e g, outdoor nature/interpretive center) Picnic facilities (tables, barbecues, shelters) Multi -sport field complex (lighted) Community gathering spaces/outdoor event facility/amphitheater New playgrounds More lighted athletic fields Basketball courts (lighted) Outdoor fitness equipment (in parks and trails) Expand parking at City parks and facilities New park in southwest RC Splash pad/spray ground Open space/undeveloped areas Additional dog park(s) Additional tennis courts (lighted) Other 4.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 Average Rating ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 19 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Importance of OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved (Percent Important vs. Not Important) Complete Central Park 7096 Shade structures in park 6596 o Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga 63% Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) 70 Community gardens/urban agriculture S7% o Nature -based facilities (e g, outdoor nature/interpretive 569'o center) Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga 5% Picnic facilities (tables, barbecues, shelters) 53% Community gathering spaces/outdoor event facility/amphitheater 43 70, Multi -sport field complex (lighted)' 14.170 479b Basketball courts (lighted) More lighted athletic fields 46% New playgrounds 46% Splash pad/spray ground Outdoor fitness equipment (in parks and trails) r 4296 Additional dog park(s) Expand parking at City parks and facilities 3S' Open space/undeveloped areas 37% New park in southwest RC 37q°' Additional tennis courts (lighted) 37% Other 69% ` 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Important (4 or 5) ■ Not Important (1 or 2) RRC Associates 20 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important OUTDOOR Facilities to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next Five Years Complete Central Park Trail connections within Rancho Cucamonga Shade structures in park Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes (learn to swim programs, water fitness, recreational open swim) Regional trail connections outside Rancho Cucamonga Multi -sport field complex (lighted) Community gardens/urban agriculture Community gathering spaces/outdoor event facility/amphitheater Nature -based facilities (e g, outdoor nature/interpretive center) Outdoor fitness equipment (in parks and trails) Splash pad/spray ground New park in southwest RC Additional dog park(s) Picnic facilities (tables, barbecues, shelters) Expand parking at City parks and facilities Open space/undeveloped areas More lighted athletic fields Additional tennis courts (lighted) New playgrounds 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Percent of Households ■ Most Important Second Most Important s Third Most Important (Combined) Top Three r RRC Associates 21 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Most Important Facility/Park Options to be Developed Complete Central Park Trails and trail connectivity Focus on maintaining what we have Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Improve existing parks/community centers/city facilities Children's discovery center/interactive museum Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Multi -sports field complex Improve existing Equestrian Center Gymnasium 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Percent of Households ■ Most Important Second Most Important (Combined) Top Two RRC Associates 23 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Most Important Facility/Park Options to be Developed - Open Link Children's discovery center/interactive museum Complete Central Park Trails and trail connectivity Focus on maintaining what we have Indoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Outdoor swimming pool for recreational purposes Multi -sports field complex Improve existing Equestrian Center Improve existing parks/community centers/city facilities Gymnasium 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■ Most Important ■ Second Most Important (Combined) Top Two RRC Associates 24 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage of Households Indicating a Need for Programs, Activities, and Special Events Special events (e g , concerts/movies in the park, Founders Parade, fireworks, community celebrations) Fitness and wellness programs Cultural/performing arts programs General education, skills education (computers, cooking, babysitting, etc ) Environmental/nature programs Volunteer programs (e g , coaching, senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc ) Senior activities Sports programs - adult Learn to swim programs Family programs Children/youth activities (non -sport) Sports programs - youth Baby Boomer programs Summer day camp Teen activities Other 14% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 25 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Percentage Level of How Well Program Needs Are Being Met Sports programs - youth Cultural/performing arts programs Sports programs - adult acial events (e g , concerts/movies in the park, Founders Parade, fireworks, community celebrations) nteer programs (e g , coaching, senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc ) Senior activities Fitness and wellness programs Family programs Teen activities Children/youth activities (non -sport) 3eneral education, skills education (computers, cooking, babysitting, etc ) Summer day camp Environmental/nature programs Learn to swim programs Baby Boomer programs Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Average Percentage Level . ■ Total Random Sample RRC Associates 26 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 How Well Programs Needs are Being Met (Percent Needs Met vs. Needs Not Met) Sports programs - youth Cultural/performing arts programs Sports programs - adult acial events (e g , concerts/movies in the park, Founders Parade, fireworks, community celebrations) nteer programs (e g , coaching, senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc ) Senior activities Learn to swim programs Fitness and wellness programs ieneral education, skills education (computers, cooking, babysitting, etc ) Teen activities Family programs Children/youth activities (non -sport) Summer day camp Environmental/nature programs Baby Boomer programs Other 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of Households ■ Needs Met Well (75% or 100%) ■ Needs Not Met Well (0`Yo or 25%) RRC Associates 27 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Top Three Most Important Programs, Activities, and Special Events to be Added, Expanded, or Improved Over Next Five Years Special events (e g , concerts/movies in the park, Founders Parade, fireworks, community celebrations) Fitness and wellness programs Senior activities Environmental/nature programs Cultural/performing arts programs General education, skills education (computers, cooking, babysitting, etc ) Sports programs - youth Sports programs - adult Children/youth activities (non -sport) Learn to swim programs Volunteer programs (e g , coaching, senior volunteers, Lewis Family Playhouse and library programs etc ) Family programs Baby Boomer programs Teen activities Summer day camp 196 36 a z ,z �( r 54d°'t 15% r 12 i t 5r„ 34G �10% f 4% 4% 096 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Percent of Households ■ Most Important leMost Important ■ Third Most Important (Combined) Top Three RRC Associates 28 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 80% C U a v, .0 C W M 3 O . s O 00p M w C u W a 0% Programs, Activities, Special Events — Importance vs. Needs -Met Matrix - Random Sample Overall Higher number of HH In -need/ 0 �° m - Higher number of HH in -need/ Lower level of needs being met z v Higher level of needs being met rt+aY'— N y 3 *-Special Events �o O T V Fitness Wellness Prog Cultural Performing Ar s GenEdu/Skills Edu Env./Nature Prog Volunteer grog MIDPOINT OF IMPORTANCE i �enior Activities Learn to Swim Prog RATINGS SCORES (33%)_. _ _____.__ Sports Prog -Adult Family Prog Baby Boomer Prog _ ; Children/youth Activities Sports Prog - Youth ♦=—Teen Activities Summer Day Camp Lower number of HH in -need/ Lower number of HH in -need/ Lower level of needs being met Higher level of needs being met 40% 80% How well needs are currently being met (average percentage rating) RRC Associates 29 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Opinions on Amount of Spending by Rancho Cucamonga 10% Providing current 44% recreation programs 5% 41% Maintaining existing 7% 7 , parks, trails, recreation 5 % facilities and community Sg'o centers 0q6 Improvements to 1796 existing parks, trails, 45% ?. recreation facilities and community centers 32% -' Building new parks, 20% R' trails, recreation 3595! 9 facilities and community 9%,,� centers 364W „a 0% 10% 2096 30% 40% 50% 60% Percent of Households ■ Too little ■ About right ■ Too much ■ Don't Know RRC Associates 30 I Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 Additional Additional Amount of Tax Willing to Pay Annually RRC Associates 31 Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Citywide Survey 2013 rapevine/Rancho Reporter E-mail (Listserve) ncho Cucamonga website Posters/flyers Other ntern et/websites Local newspaper king (i a Twitter, ebook) ie recreation program location V channel (RCN) Family Playhouse ison Brochure Digital billboards Best and Current Methods of Receiving Communication 0 0 h ■ Total Random Sample o% ■ Best Method ■ Current Method RRC Associates 32 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 14, 2013 - 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELLED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 8, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JULY 10, 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELLED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Valerie Victorino, Planning Department Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 3, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 12, 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 6, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MAY 8, 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California L. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell A Ray Wimberly X Janet Ryerson X Candyce Burnett A Bill Pallotto A Carol Douglass (Equestrian) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle) X Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) X Kelly Matheny (Alternate) A II II. NEW BUSINESS III A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) into 291 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Development Review DRC2012-01202. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012- 01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1870. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 1 of 2 ACTION The Committee recommended the project be forwarded to the Planning Commission for approval. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 8, 2013 II III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT III 2of2 None 7:30 PM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MAY 8, 2013 6:00 PM _ WNCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ 11 II. NEW BUSINESS III A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) into 291 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Development Review DRC2012-01202. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012- 01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side ofArrowRoute; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1870. Staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts for consideration. 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA RANCHO CUCAMONGA MAY 812013 II III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. II IV. ADJOURNMENT III 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 2, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2of2 0 0 i �n3 g� a na('o <; a r �0c0, 0 n o n� v '' -90 z• 3 0 a a East D 0 N Q 0 00 CD 0 rMIL -�� NrMIL a 0 0 rMIL CD cD LEGEND O1 SPLIT -FACE PERIMETER BLOCK WALL. O2 6". POURED IN PLACE CONCRETE HEADER. CORNERSTONE 0 MODIFIED COMMUNITY TRAIL SECTION WITHIN SCE CORRIDOR SCALE: 1 / 4" =1'-0" TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET May 8, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A request to subdivide a vacant parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) into 291 lots in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Development Review DRC2012-01202. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 - LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA - A review of 291 single-family homes that will be constructed in conjunction with a proposed subdivision of a parcel of about 3,047,614 square feet (79.67-acres) in the Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay), located about 525 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue at the north side of Arrow Route; APN: 0229-041-09. Related file: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT1870. Site Characteristics: The project site is an irregularly shaped vacant parcel with an overall area of about 3.5 million square feet (80.8 acres). The site is approximately 1,900 feet deep (north to south); because of its irregular shape, it is approximately 1,300 feet wide (east to west) at the north property line and approximately 2,100 feet wide at the south property line. There is a "dog leg" extension that is approximately 270 feet in width and 688 feet in length at the northwest corner of the property that extends to Foothill Boulevard. The project site was previously used by Ameron, a concrete pipe manufacturer located nearby at the southwest corner of Etiwanda Avenue and Arrow Route, for outdoor storage (of, for example, finished pipe segments). To the west of the project site are the Victoria Woods apartment complex and a single-family residential subdivision. To the north is the San Sevaine Villas apartment complex. To the east are single-family residences, a mobile home park, and some minor industrial uses located within a portion of unincorporated San Bernardino County (Exhibit B-Ariel Map). To the south are legal, non -conforming single-family residences, industrial uses (principally outdoor storage), and several vacant parcels. Principal street frontage will be along Arrow Route with a length of approximately 2,100 feet. Secondary street frontage will be along Foothill Boulevard with a length of approximately 270 feet (at the north end of the aforementioned "dog leg"). A corridor comprised of easements in favor of Southern California Edison (SCE) and Southern California Gas Company (SCGC), and associated improvements such as transmission lines, are located parallel to the west property line of the project site. The width of the easement for SCE is 250 feet while the width of three (3) separate easements for SCGC is 110 feet (combined). This corridor is approximately 22 acres in area. The "dog leg" portion of the property is entirely within this corridor. Because of the presence of this utility corridor, the actual area of the project site that is available for development is approximately 64 acres. The Etiwanda/San Sevaine flood control channel is located parallel to the east property line of the project site. The zoning of the majority of the site is Low Medium (LM) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay); the portion of the site that is within the utility corridor described above is zoned Open Space (OS) District. The zoning of the properties to the west beyond the utility corridor are Low (L), Low Medium (LM), and Medium (M) Residential Districts, Etiwanda Specific Plan (South Overlay). The zoning of the property to the north is Medium (M) Residential District, Foothill Boulevard Overlay Zoning District (Subarea 4). The zoning of the properties to the south is General Industrial (GI) District. The subject property is generally level with an elevation at the north and south sides of about 1,180 feet and 1,155 feet, respectively. There are no trails (Local or Community) that link the project site to existing trails. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA May 8, 2013 Page 2 Design Parameters: The applicant proposes to construct a north -south segment of the Community Trail within the aforementioned utility corridor per Figure CS-3 — Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan - of the General Plan in conjunction with subdivision of the property into 291 numbered lots for a private (gated) single-family residential development. There will be an additional eleven (11) lettered lots for an existing, unrelated Southern Gas Company facility (Lot A) and common areas as follows: open space along the Arrow Route street frontage (Lots B — D); two private parks (Lots E and F); pedestrian access pathways (Lots G and H), and private streets (Lot 1). This Community Trail segment will extend the full distance between Foothill Boulevard and Arrow Route. It will be located generally adjacent, and parallel, to the eastern limit of the utility corridor and the rear property lines of proposed Lots 1 — 21, 138, 137, and 141 —146. The total length of the trail will be about 2,700 feet. Per the General Plan, Arrow Route will be the south terminus of the trail, i.e., the trail will not continue further south. At Foothill Boulevard the trail will eventually connect with the trail segment that will be constructed by others in conjunction with future development on the other side of that street. Two (2) pedestrian connections, with decorative features such as overhead trellises, will link the subdivision to the Community Trail. These connections are located between Lots 20 and 21, and Lots 1 and 137 (identified as Lots G and H, respectively). Based on separate meetings with representatives of SCE and SCGC, as the trail will be located within the overlapping easements of both utilities where infrastructure is present (SCE transmission towers and lines above -ground and a SCGC pipeline below ground), the design of the trail will be subject to their authority and restrictions. Trail -related improvements such as fences, light standards, landscaping, etc. that are typically required for Community Trails may be very limited or not present altogether along this segment of the Community Trail system. For example, trees that could encroach into the clear area required around SCE's power lines while the roots of the trees could damage SCGC's pipeline. Therefore, trees are not permitted within the corridor. Similarly, fences would affect both utilities' maintenance vehicle access to their respective infrastructure and are, therefore, prohibited. Potential expansion of either company's infrastructure could be affected by semi -permanent improvements such as benches and light poles. Thus, these improvements are also not permitted. Both SCE and SCGC will require that the applicant submit plans for their respective review and approval. Staff anticipates that the trail most likely will be limited to a pathway composed of decomposed granite, a concrete mow strip to define its edges, and ground cover. Staff proposes planting trees within the rear yard area of Lots 1 — 21, 138, 137, and 141 —146. This would offset the lack of trees within the trail and would be located completely outside of the limits of the utility corridor. Trees would be planted at a rate of two (2) trees per yard for a total of sixty-two (62) trees. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with the following conditions: 1. The Community Trail and entry points at Arrow Route and Foothill. Boulevard shall be designed and constructed per the City Standard for Community Trails to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning Manager. The design of the trail and associated improvements shall be coordinated with, and are subject to the approval of, Southern California Edison and Southern California Gas Company. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18870 AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2012-01202 — LENNAR HOMES OF CALIFORNIA May 8, 2013 Page 3 2. A copy of any comments and/or corrections in response to plans submitted to SCE and SCGC shall be provided to the City for determination of alternate solutions, if necessary, and for the file record. 3. Install two (2) trees within the rear yard area of Lots 1 — 21, 138, 137, and 141 — 146. The species and minimum box size of these trees shall match the tree requirements described in the City Standard applicable to Community Trails as established by the Engineering Department. 4. Landscaping planted along the trail shall be located on the east side of the trail pathway, between the pathway and the perimeter wall of the subdivision. 5. A copy of the final design of the Community Trail shall be provided to the Planning Department for the file record. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Attachments: A — Trails Exhibit B — Arial Map C — Correspondence from Southern California Edison (SCE) D — Conceptual Trail Cross Section Exhibit E — Copy of Plans Trails Advisory. Committee Action: FOOTHILL ,-Ilb kb, VICTORIA WOODS APARTMENTS (NaT-A-PART) osoY 4 0 cukt4vatiq cj A,, Towro & RENAW SAN SEVAINE V1 ( NOT -A -PART I L117 --- LL�- � --� -fir � -� � � - IrIT- -�j% S` ' /' ' / >r Ir � � it � � Ir � UN ---- --------- ---- ---- ----- /)Elf ., S.C,E EOWEHJ / �• $� I� �� - Lar F P A A K - — ------ ----------- ---- 8 ap Lai 11, oil t J-p- ti L H L E , P JL K - M-9 Lar E 10 PARK -- -- -- ---- ---- --- - - -- - -- -------- -- LOT i --- ---- --- sl 12 LOT I L LOT B ar c 0 Development Review DRC2012-01202 ani-il Tentative Tract • SUBTT18870 �T M4} CHERVIL — - - t I WI ..,h` �a•s + � �' nk I.i ]t tYs��+- �-��.;�L.."��j'�"�mki-r� /._ ` IF s ,� � '¢ J�+�r '��;,•�'`� � `E>. ' s 5OTHILL - vr Ail I1•'a ;, —_ .+ '_ I''a yam— _ rf' A = r gk _ d Air r 44 & }j{ r 5' �' .act ij 3 t t 11 �E -q• �h 3„1 f�tt 4�,r r`' ,sag ,i r �d S� � 'j ��54^-.,. I■ � P .-Ali A. yo '�q � ,� �, £ �t• r �� - ® it r�.+ -%. . Protect Site w. 3 1j, ga- l� 'F .w I -- ARROW _ R - r - A r - x _ I — R « f 77 CE jM. EXHIBITts. y ova 7 -, „. -. SOUTHERN CMIFORNLA. I SO 6=j ED IN April 4, 2013 Dan Guerra & Associates 10271-B Trademark Street Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Attention: Mr. Dan Guerra Subject: Consent Plan Checklist Dear Mr. Guerra, This letter is in response to your request for information to obtain a Consent Agreement. You are required to submit a cover letter and plans for your request. Your plans will be reviewed by Southern California Edison Company (SCE) upon receipt. Once the plans have been reviewed, you will be advised of any necessary processing/review fees for SCE's review of the plans and issuance of a Consent Agreement. The processing/review fee requested will cover the cost of, including -but not limited to, the Transmission Department Business Unit (TDBU) technical plan review and labor costs, an evaluation of SCE's land rights, Real Properties (RP) Agent labor and transmission line sag calculations. If anti -climbing guards are required they will be handled separately. Please be advised that the SCE plan review may result in restrictions imposed upon the plans, including a denial of the request to approve the plans. Please note, if additional and/or revised plans are required, each new set of plans or revisions will be treated like a new request and possibly require an additional 6-8 weeks for processing. SCE's review of the plans is designed to ensure that: • The proposed use will not conflict with SCE's rights within the Right of Way, • That the proposed development is compatible with the Right of Way, • That the proposed development does not result in an interference with SCE's ability to operate, inspect, access, and maintain its facilities, and • That the proposed development does not impede on SCE's responsibility to ensure the safety of the public and SCE employees. If SCE approves the plans, a Consent Agreement will be issued that identifies any conditions to which the development will be subject. Unless agreed to in advance, all new requests must be accompanied by the following (refer to the enclosed Constraints and Guidelines document for full details): Consent Request Cover Letter including the following: • A summary of the reason for the Consent request, and h 30 EXHIBIT C • The project location. Three (3) Printed Sets of Final Plans along with a disc with the plans saved in PDF format will be required prior to the Consent Agreement being issued. • Preliminary, Conceptual, or Site Plans may be used for discussion purposes only. • Approvals will not be granted until two (2) sets of the final plans are received. Three (3) Printed Sets Scaled plans (1" = 50' Maximum) along with a disc with the plans saved in PDF format. The Scaled plans must have the following clearly and accurately plotted on all submitted sheets: • SCE Rights of Way (R/W) • SCE Property lines • All of SCE Towers and Poles o All SCE Towers must have a 100' radius from face of tower footings o SCE 66kV & 115 kV poles must have the following clearances: ■ 25' radius for H-Frame multi or single pole type structures • 10' radius around wood, fiber, concrete, or steel poles • 10' radius around anchors/guy wires, riser, and guy poles o Minimum 27' of clearance from overhead lines (conductors) to the ground Improvement Plans with a complete legend sheet for each plan, include, but are not limited to any structures/items that will impact SCE's ability to operate and maintain its facilities with the R/W or may result in Interference with SCE's facilities with such operations and maintenance: • Grading • Street Improvements o Including signage, and o Profiles of finished street surface elevations. • Street Lights (generally not permitted on R/W) • Utilities • Pipelines • Landscaping and Irrigation o Valves/controllers of any type are not permitted on R/W if they cause Interference. o No portion of any mature tree will be permitted under or within 10' of conductor drip lines. o Trees must not exceed 15' in height at maturity. • Water Improvements o Valves/controllers of any type are not permitted on R/W if they cause Interference. • Sewer • Fencing o Cross fencing permitted only at streets, unless reserved in Grant of Easement by Grantor. 0 16' wide -double gate with an SCE lock is required for any cross - fencing. • Any structures Parallel or longitudinal encroachments will not be permitted if: o The Grant of Easement prohibits it, or iltt::lli (. ii;i1i11U: 2i1. {,.l o The use will result in Interference. o If improvements cross RAIV, they must do so perpendicular to centerline of R/VV. If Parking is requested, and the Grant of Easement is: • Silent to parking, then: a The design cannot cause Interference, o Must allow for vertical and horizontal clearances of facilities, and o Provide 24/7 access to SCE. • Prohibits parking, then parking is not allowed. I look forward to working with you in the future with your request. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns in the interim. Best Regards, Diego Diaz Land Services Agent Real Properties -Eastern Region Southern California Edison Company 9500 Cleveland Ave., Suite 100 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Southern C a'h!Orni [ dkoo 9 -i`) i [e vd'land vK%. Suilie 1001 Southern California Edison Company Transmission Line Right of Way Constraints and Guidelines The primary purpose of SCE's Transmission Rights of Way (ROW) and Substations is to house SCE's electrical system and related facilities. SCE is committed to ensuring it operates and maintains a safe and reliable electric system, both, now and in the future. The use of SCE's ROW is guided by California Public Utilities Commission regulations (General Order No. 69- C), which define the need to protect utility system operations and provide guidance on overall uses of the ROW, the types of agreements allowed, and related approval processes. If you are proposing uses within SCE's ROW, please ensure that you contact SCE prior to developing your plans. Any proposed uses must be compatible, low -intensity uses (i.e. green belts, bike and hiking trails, etc.) that do not impose additional constraints on SCE's ability to maintain and operate its current facilities and that do not interfere with any future operating facility needs. The following are constraints and guidelines to assist in the development of your plans within SCE's transmission ROW. 1. All projects are unique and will be reviewed on a case by case basis. 2. Buildings and other permanent structures, both, above ground and underground, are prohibited within SCE's ROW. Examples of permanent structures are pipelines, concrete slabs, foundations, vaults, decks, detention basins, pools, and anything else that is not portable and easily movable. 3. No parallel or longitudinal encroachments will be permitted. All improvements crossing in the ROW must do so perpendicular to the centerline of the ROW. 4. Any proposed use(s) on SCE's ROW that are specifically prohibited in SCE's easement document will be denied. 5. SCE's access to its ROW and facilities must be maintained 24/7 and cannot be encumbered in order to ensure SCE's access for system operations, maintenance, and emergency response. 6. All proposed grading requires a clearance review. Costs for engineered conductor clearance reviews required by SCE are to be paid for by the requestor. 7. All users of SCE's land shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable federal, state, county, and local laws affecting use of SCE's land. The user must obtain all permits and other governmental approvals required for the proposed use. 8. No plant species protected by federal or state law shall be planted within SCE's ROW. 9. All new trees and shrubs proposed on SCE's ROW shall be slow growing and not exceed 15 feet in height. 10. No wetlands, other sensitive natural habitat, vegetation related natural plant areas, or environmental mitigation on SCE's ROW will be permitted as it creates interference with SCE's ability to access its facilities and to add future facilities. 11. Groundwater or storm water infiltration or recharge will not be allowed. 12. Flammable or combustible materials are not allowed to be used or stored on SCE's ROW. 13. SCE may require a third -party user to implement certain safety measures or mitigations as a condition to approval of the third -party use. Users of SCE's ROW must adhere to minimum grounding standards dictated by SCE. 2/2/2012 Page 1 of 2 14. Uses on SCE's ROW will not be approved if deemed unsafe. An example of an unsafe condition includes (but is not limited to) instances where the proposed use may create levels of induced voltage that are unsafe to SCE employees or the public that cannot be mitigated to safe levels. 15. Horizontal Clearances o Towers, Engineered Steel Poles & H-Frames 161kV to 500kV ■ Lattice/Aesthetic & H-Frames (dead-end) 100 fL ■ Engineered Steel Poles (dead-end) 100 ft. ■ Suspension Towers & H-Frames 50 ft. ■ Suspension Steel Poles 50 ft. o Wood or Light -Weight Steel Poles & H-Frames 66kV to 115kV ■ Engineered Steel Poles w/ Found. (TSP) (dead-end) 25 ft. ■ H-Frame 25 ft. ■ Wood Poles 25 ft. ■ Light -Weight Steel Poles 25 fL ■ Anchor Rods 10 fL ■ Guy Wires 10 ft. ■ Guy Poles 10 ft. ■ Lattice Anchor Towers (dead-end) 100 ft. • Lattice Suspension Towers 50 ft. 16. Vertical Clearances o Structure ■ 500kV 30 ft. ■ 220kV 18 ft. ■ 66kV 18 ft. ■ <66kV (distribution facilities) 12 ft. ■ Telecom 8 ft. o Vehicle Access ■ 500kV 36 ft. ■ 220kV 30 ft. ■ 66kV 30 ft. ■ <66kV (distribution facilities) 25 ft. ■ Telecom 18 ft. o Pedestrian Access • 500kV 31ft. • 220kV 25 ft. ■ 66kV 25 ft. ■ <66kV (distribution facilities) 17 ft. ■ Telecom 10 ft. 17. Roads constructed on SCE ROW or where a third party's access road coincides with SCE's access to SCE ROW or facilities must comply with SCE's engineering standards. o The drivable road surface shall be constructed to provide a dense, smooth and uniform riding surface. The minimum drivable road surface shall be 14 feet wide with an additional 2 feet of swale/berm on each side as required. o The minimum centerline radius on all road curves shall be 50 feet measured at the centerline of the drivable road surface. The minimum drivable width of all roads shall be increased on curves by a distance equal to 400/Radius of curvature. o The road shall be sloped in a manner to prevent standing water or damage from undirected water flow. Maximum cross slope shall not exceed 2%, maximum grade not to exceed 12%. 2/2/2012 Page 2 of 2 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 10, 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 4, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MARCH 13, 2013 - 6:00 PM _ RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 7, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA February 13, 2013 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 6, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2013 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly X Janet Ryerson X Candyce Burnett X Bill Pallotto X Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_X_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _X_ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _X_ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ II II. NEW BUSINESS III ACTION 6:05 PM A. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18823 - The project was JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family recommended to be residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low forwarded to the Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west Planning side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court. APN: 0226-081- Commission 15,16 & 17. CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 2012. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III None This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 11 6:30 PM 1 of 1 TRAILS ADVISORYCOMMITTEE ACTION COMMENT SHEET January 9, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 2012 Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide 12.93 acres of vacant land into 19 lots for single-family residential development on the west side Wardman Bullock Road south of Blue Sky Court. This site is in the Very Low Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,080 square feet to approximately 40,924 square feet. The applicant is not proposing any housing product at this time. The trails generally travel north to south in this subdivision and are all located at the rear of the lots. The trails along the west tract boundary and the trail access for Lots 9 and 10 along the south boundary are proposed to connect to the trail proposed for Tentative Tract Map 18741. An agreement still needs to be negotiated to achieve this connection. The applicants are proposing to have two -rail PVC trail fencing along the west and south tract boundaries. Although this is consistent with one of the City trail fencing standards, it is not consistent with the project to the south which has proposed three -rail trail fencing. The rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. The proposed community to the south (Tentative Tract Map 18741), will need to allow access to their trail to allow riders and pedestrian access to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue. If this is not allowed it would detach this neighborhood from the community trail system in that access will need to be allowed at the southwest corner of the tract so that all proposed lots will have access to the Community Trail. Both parties have been in contact with each other but no agreement has been made. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Major Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined in the Development Code and Trail Implementation Plan. The one major issue regarding this project at this time is the access of the proposed project to the south to allow trail access to the Community Trail along Wilson Avenue. A step through can be installed where the connection is granted to restrict vehicle traffic as this is a concern for the applicant of Tentative Tract Map 18741. Minor Issues: A minor issue that requires discussion is that the applicants to the south are proposing three -rail PVC trail fencing and this applicant is proposing two -rail trail fencing along the west boundary. For consistency both projects should be required to provide the same number of rails and follow the same City standard. The Community Trail Standard allows for either design. Tentative Tract Map 18741 has already been to Trails Advisory Committee and recommended approval. Policy Issues: No policy issues at this time. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to have the applicant work with the applicant to the south to gain access to the trail that leads to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue and recommend that the applicant provide three -rail fencing to be consistent with the project to the south. Staff Planner: Steve Fowler Action: The applicant Jonathan Curtis attended the meeting as the receiver of the project. Committee member Carol Douglass posed questions about the location of the trails and the ability of the lots to connect to the trail. The major and minor issues were addressed and the applicant agreed to provide three -rail trail fencing along the west boundary for consistency with the proposed tract to the south and is in discussion with the property owner to the south to obtain access to the trail system. The committee recommended that the application move forward with the staff recommendations. The meeting adjourned at 6:30 pm. THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JANUARY 9, 2013 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 1 I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly_ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett_ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II II. NEW BUSINESS III A. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18823 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court. APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 2012. 11 III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT 11 Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or ly designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was )sted on January 3, 2013, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code ection 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 a c 0 3 3 r c'n Grove �.t—.r"—"y.�..r••—•:ter e(e e•'��. rn 4 ?I' Ile, He "n c Ro he 0=3 —r o � C 2, Etiwan v East! -n 0 o =r o c S ' z Milliken pphire Hell Arch Haven TRAILS ADVISORYCOMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET January 9, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. CONTINUED FROM DECEMBER 12, 2012 Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide 12.93 acres of vacant land into 19 lots for single-family residential development on the west side Wardman Bullock Road south of Blue Sky Court. This site is in the Very Low Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,080 square feet to approximately 40,924 square feet. The applicant is not proposing any housing product at this time. The trails generally travel north to south in this subdivision and are all located at the rear of the lots. The trails along the west tract boundary and the trail access for Lots 9 and 10 along the south boundary are proposed to connect to the trail proposed for Tentative Tract Map 18741. An agreement still needs to be negotiated to achieve this connection. The applicants are proposing to have two -rail PVC trail fencing along the west and south tract boundaries. Although this is consistent with one of the City trail fencing standards, it is not consistent with the project to the south which has proposed three -rail trail fencing. The rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. The proposed community to the south (Tentative Tract Map 18741), will need to allow access to their trail to allow riders and pedestrian access to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue. If this is not allowed it would detach this neighborhood from the community trail system in that access will need to be allowed at the southwest corner of the tract so that all proposed lots will have access to the Community Trail. Both parties have been in contact with each other but no agreement has been made. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Major Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined in the Development Code and Trail Implementation Plan. The one major issue regarding this project at this time is the access of the proposed project to the south to allow trail access to the Community Trail along Wilson Avenue. A step through can be installed where the connection is granted to restrict vehicle traffic as this is a concern for the applicant of Tentative Tract Map 18741. Minor Issues: A minor issue that requires discussion is that the applicants to the south are proposing three -rail PVC trail fencing and this applicant is proposing two -rail trail fencing along the west boundary. For consistency both projects should be required to provide the same number of rails and follow the same City standard. The Community Trail Standard allows for either design. Tentative Tract Map 18741 has already been to Trails Advisory Committee and recommended approval. Policy Issues: No policy issues at this time. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to have the applicant work with the applicant to the south to gain access to the trail that leads to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue and recommend that the applicant provide three -rail fencing to be consistent with the project to the south. Staff Planner: Steve Fowler MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT i l RANCHO Date: October 3, 2012 UUCAMONGA To: Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary From: Gail Elwood, Office Specialist II J?-, Subject: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETINGS - CONFERENCE ROOMS FOR 2013 Below are the dates and Conference Rooms for the Trails Advisory Committee meetings for the year 2013. January 9 . Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. February 13 Rains Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. March 13 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. April 10 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. May 8 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. June 12 Rains Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. July 10 Rains Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. August 14 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. September 11 Rains Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. October 9 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. November 13 Haven Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. December 11 Rains Conference Room 4:00 p.m. — 9:30 p.m. Attachments January 07 January 2 February 2013 — S T M T W T F S S M T W T F S Janua 13 12345 6 7 8 9101112 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13141516 17 18 19 10 1112 13 14 15 16 20 2122 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 Monday, January 07 Thursday, Janua 1 7_.Wam_8:30am Counter,Meefings (Donald) ext._ 4314,(Haven.Room)� 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) Tuesday Ja, nuary 08 Friday, January 1 [8:00am 9:00am P and E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303' ? '(Haven,Room) 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) Wednesday January 09 Saturday,January 1 rk�ooafn 2LOOA lanning Distribution Donald) exL 4314 (Haven 0 45015m 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee - Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) Sunday, January 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 11:04 AM February 11 - February 17 4:00pm_ 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee, Lois ext. 4329 (Conference Room - Rains)_ February 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2728 March 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121314 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1:00pm 5:00pm Updated: Project Managers Meeting (Conference Room -Rains) Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 9:16 AM March 11 — March 2013 April 2013 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S March 17 345678 78111113 1011 1213 14 15 16 .1415161718 1920 20 171819 20 21 22 23 2122 23 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 Monday, March 11 Thursday, March 1 L7 30am 8.30am Counter Meetings (Doriald)_ext. 4314 (Haven_Roorn 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) Tuesday March 12 Friday, March 1 8:OOarn P and E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 _9:OOam lHaven.Rooma 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) Wednesday, March 13 Saturday, March 1 8:00@ 9:00 Planning DiS( butt (LaO yJ ext:�Q3 i (Ha +er Room) ' 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee - Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) Sunday, March 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:06 AM April 08 - April 14 1_7:30am,,_8;,30am Counter. Meetings.(Dona(d)_ext, 4314.(Haypn Room) 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 8:00am _9,OOam P and E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 {Hav_en•Room) 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee - Lois, ext. 4329 Conference Room) April 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 it 12 13 14151617 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 282,930 May 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12131415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1] Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:07 AM May 06 May 2013 June 2013 � S M T W T F S S M T W T F S May 12 567811 2345 67 12131415 161718 910 1112 13 14 15 19 20 2122 23 24 25 16171819 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Monday, May 06 Thursday, May 0 am 8 7:30_s _30am CounterMeeting ,_�.o .(Donald) e4,o 314 (Haven Room)J 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) , 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) I Tuesday May 07 _ Friday May 1 8:006m_9:00am P and E Meeting (Tabe%Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 jHaven. Room) I Wednesday, May 08 _ Saturday, May 11 00am 900a Plafrni istnbtAVn[ ,, L( any)-p-t,,-43QUtdaveja-R_a_om), 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) Sunday, May 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:08 AM Tune 10 - ]une 16 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Room - Rains) 1 11 Lois ext. 4329 (Conference June 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1213 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30 July 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 1718 1920 21 22 23 24252627 28 29 30 31 1:00pm 5:00pm Updated: Project Managers Meeting (Conference Room -Rains) 16 Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 9:16 AM July 08 - 7uly 14 4:OOpm_ 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee, Lois ext. 4329 (Conference Room =Rains) July 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 1718 1920 21 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31 August 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 11 12 131415 16 17 1819202122 2324 25 2627 2829 30 31 1:00pm 5:00pm Updated: Project Managers Meeting (Conference Room -Rains) Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 9:17 AM August 12 — August 2013 September 2013 S M T W T F S S M T W T F S August 18 4 5 6 7 8 910 8 1112 13 14 11 121314 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 2930 Monday, Au ust 12 Thursday, August 1 L7:30am�8:30am Counter Meetirlgs_(Donaid) _ext;, 4314,(Haven Room)„� 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) Tuesday Au ust 13 Friday, August 1 L8,69am_9,00am P and'E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 {Haven loom) 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) Wednesday, Au ust 14 Saturday, August 1 :0 a :OOa Planning Distributi,o� (Donald}ext. 4314 {�avetj 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee -Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) Sunday, August 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:15 AM September 09 - September 15 L:00pm, _9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee, Lois ext. 4329 (Conference Room -Rains).______ September 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 October 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1:00pm 5:00pm Updated: Project Managers Meeting (Conference Room -Rains) Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 9:17 AM October 07 October 2013 November 2013 � S M T W T F S S M T W T F S October 13 6 7 8 111 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13141516171819 10 111213 14 15 16 20 2122 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Monday, October 07 Thursday, October 1 7 30am 4:30amwCountgrmMeetings,-(DonpId) ext. 4314 (Haven Room) `f 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) I Tuesday October 08 Friday, October 1 L6 OQam q:00am P and E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 # (Haven Room) 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) Wednesday,October 09 Saturday, October 1 8:OOam 9 OOam Planning Distribution (Donald) ext. 4314 (Haven, a 4:06pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee - Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) Sunday, October 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:15 AM November 11 — November M T W T F S S T IF December T IF S M T W T F S November 17 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 19 10 14 15 16 20 214 61718 1 15 19 20 21 171819 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 Monday, November it Thursday,November 1 f7:3Oam_8:30_am Counter Meetings„(Donald)_ext,_4314,,(Hayen Raom)�J 9:00am 10:00am Planning Counter Staff meeting/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) 11:00am 12:30pm Planning - Val x 4327 (Conference Room -Haven) 2:00pm 3:00pm Senior Staff meeting/James and Senior Staff/Valerie ext 4327 (Haven Room) I Tuesday, November 12 Friday, November 1 L OOan9:00am P and E Meeting (Tabe/Donald) ext. 4316 or 4303 (Haven. Room){ 1:00pm 3:30pm Planning Director Meeting (Haven Conference Room) Wednesday,November 13 Saturday November 1 8:OOam 9:00 m anning„pistrib io (�r�rya,��,�Q3__(�a oo� 4:00pm 9:30pm Trails Advisory Committee - Lois, ext. 4329 (Haven Conference Room) I Sunday, November 1 Conference Room -Haven 1 10/3/2012 9:10 AM December 09 - December 15 Trails Advisory Committee, Lois ext. 4329 (Conferer Room - Rains) December 2013 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1112,13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 3031 January 2014 S M T W T F S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 1:00pm 5:00pm Updated: Project Managers Meeting (Conference Room -Rains) Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 9:17 AM January 02, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 January 08, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room January 09, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 January 16, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 January 23, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 January 30, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 February 06, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 February 12, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room February 13, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 February 20, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 Conference Room -Rains 1 10/3/2012 10:53 AM February 27, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 March 06, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 March 12, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room 11 March 13, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 March 20, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 March 27, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 April 03, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 April 09, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room April 10, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 April 17, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 Conference Room -Rains 2 10/3/2012 10:53 AM April 24, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 May 01, 2014 Thursday I - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 May 08, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 May 14, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room May 15, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 May 22, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 May 29, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 June 05, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 June 11, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room June 12, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 Conference Room -Rains 3 10/3/2012 10:53 AM June 19, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 June 26, 2014 Thursday I - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 July 03, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 July 09, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room July 10, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 July 17, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 July 24, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 July 31, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 August 07, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 August 13, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room Conference Room -Rains 4 10/3/2012 10:53 AM August 14, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 August 21, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 August 28, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 September 04, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 September 10, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room September 11, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 September 18, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 September 25, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 October 02, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 October 08, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room Conference Room -Rains 5 10/3/2012 10:53 AM October 09, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 October 16, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 October 23, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 October 30, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 November 06, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 November 12, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room November 13, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 November 20, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 November 27, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 December 04, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 Conference Room -Rains 6 10/3/2012 10:53 AM December 04, 2014 Continued Thursday December 10, 2014 Wednesday 4:00 PM - 9:30 PM Trails Advisory Committee, Lois Ext. 4329 -- Rains Conference Room December 11, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 December 18, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 December 25, 2014 Thursday 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM Updated: Project Managers Meeting -- Conference Room -Rains Project Managers Meeting Ext 4013 Conference Room -Rains 7 10/3/2012 10:53 AM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA _ DECEMBER 12, 2012 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly_ The Committee did not meet for lack of Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett_ Bill Pallotto _ quorum Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ II. NEW BUSINESS III A. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18823 - Jonathan C. Curtis - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court. APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. 11 III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IIIII This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT III 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 6, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA DECEMBER 12, 2012 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly_ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett_ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II II. NEW BUSINESS III A. ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP - SUBTT18823 - Jonathan C. Curtis - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road south and east of Blue Sky Court. APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. II III. PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. II IV. ADJOURNMENT It Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or y designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was )sted on December 6, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code ection 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 TRAILS ADVISORYCOMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET December 12, 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18823 - JONATHAN C. CURTIS - A request to subdivide three parcels into 19 single-family residential lots and two lettered lots on 12.93 acres of land in the Very Low Residential (VL) District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Wardman Bullock Road, south and east of Blue Sky Court - APN: 0226-081- 15, 16 & 17. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide 12.93 acres of vacant land into 19 lots for single-family residential development on the west side Wardman Bullock Road south of Blue Sky Court. This site is in the Very Low Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,080 square feet to approximately 40,924 square feet. The applicant is not proposing any housing product at this time. The trails generally travel north to south in this subdivision and are all located at the rear of the lots. The trails along the west tract boundary and the trail access for Lots 9 and 10 along the south boundary are proposed to connect to the trail proposed for Tentative Tract Map 18741. An agreement still needs to be negotiated to achieve this connection. The applicants are proposing to have two -rail PVC trail fencing along the west and south tract boundaries. Although this is consistent with one of the City trail fencing standards, it is not consistent with the project to the south which has proposed three -rail trail fencing. The rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. The proposed community to the south (Tentative Tract Map 18741), will need to allow access to their trail to allow riders and pedestrian access to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue. If this is not allowed it would detach this neighborhood from the community trail system in that access will need to be allowed at the southwest corner of the tract so that all proposed lots will have access to the Community Trail. Both parties have been in contact with each other but no agreement has been made. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Major Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined iri the Development Code and Trail Implementation Plan. The one major issue regarding this project at this time is the access of the proposed project to the south to allow trail access to the Community Trail along Wilson Avenue. A step through can be installed where the connection is granted to restrict vehicle traffic as this is a concern for the applicant of Tentative Tract Map 18741. Minor Issues: A minor issue that requires discussion is that the applicants to the south are proposing three -rail PVC trail fencing and this applicant is proposing two -rail trail fencing along the west boundary. For consistency both projects should be required to provide the same number of rails and follow the same City standard. The Community Trail Standard allows for either design. Tentative Tract Map 18741 has already been to Trails Advisory Committee and recommended approval. Policy Issues: No policy issues at this time. Staff Recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to have the applicant work with the applicant to the south to gain access to the trail that leads to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue and recommend that the applicant provide three -rail fencing to be consistent with the project to the south. Staff Planner: Steve Fowler THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA NOVEMBER 14, 2012 - 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 9, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA October 10, 2012 6:00 PM RAMC Ho Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on October 4, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1of1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly_ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto _ Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on September 6, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA AUGUST 8, 2012 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Frances Howdyshell_ Ray Wimberly_ Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on August 2, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 13, 2012 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California il I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Lou Munoz_ Frances Howdyshell Janet Ryerson_ Candyce Burnett _ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II. NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES - A residential subdivision of 53 single- family lots on 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN:0226-081-05 and 06 B. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. — A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 107 single family lots generally, located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere of Influence. 11 III. PUBLIC COMMENTS 11 This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA JUNE 13, 2012 RANCHO CUCAMONOA IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 7, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2 of 2 /94 o o=C. C��cQ D o W N cfl 00 o s r cn Grove �_..�.�.._..�:�-'.-..� •�_,rt'. East,___ ..-. D c 0 0 TRAILS ADVISORYCOMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET June 13, 2012 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18741 - CENTEX HOMES - A residential subdivision of 53 single family lots on 40.12 acres of land in the Very Low Residential district of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan, located at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road - APN:0226-081-05 and 06. Design Parameters: The applicant is proposing to subdivide 40.12 acres of vacant land into 53 lots for single-family residential development at the northwest corner of Wilson Avenue and Wardmann Bullock Road. This site is in the Very Low Residential District of the North Etiwanda Specific Plan. The lots in the tract will average approximately 25,000 square feet. The lot sizes range from 20,000 square feet to approximately 40,000 square feet. The applicant is not proposing any housing product at this time. The trails generally travel north and south in this subdivision and are all located at the rear of the lots. Because of the grades, water bars will be installed to allow for the .5 percent pad area required at the end of the north south trails leading into public right of ways. At the south ends of the trails where the water bars are located the grade percentages north of the water bars range between 9.3 to 12 percent for approximately 100 feet which is consistent with the Rancho Cucamonga Trail Implementation Plan. The trails along the west and north tract boundary are proposed to be 21 feet wide for trail and emergency access. The west and north side of the trail will have three rail PVC trail fencing and the rear yards throughout the tract will have 6-foot high block walls. Trails along Wilson Avenue and Wardman Bullock Road will be 15-feet wide with three rail PVC trail fencing along the street sides of the trail. A proposed community to the north of the project will need to obtain access to this trail to allow riders and pedestrian access to the Community Trail on Wilson Avenue. Both parties have been in contact with each other but no agreement has been made. Staff Comments: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for the Committee discussion regarding this project. Major Issues: The applicant worked hard with staff to follow the criteria outlined in the Development Code and Trail Implementation Plan. The one major issue regarding this project at this time is the access of the proposed project to the north to allow trail access to the Community Trail along Wilson Avenue. A step through can be installed where the connection is granted to restrict vehicle traffic as this is a concern for the applicant. Minor Issues: No Minor issues at this time. Policy Issues: No policy issues at this time. Staff recommendation: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee members review the proposed Tentative Tract Map and recommend approval to the Planning Commission with a recommendation to have the applicant work with the applicant to the north to grant access to the trail that leads to the community trail on Wilson Avenue. Staff Planner: Steve Fowler _]Z�—/e, 14 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET June 13, 2012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. —A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 107 single-family lots generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere of Influence. Related files Environmental Impact Report (EIR) DRC2004-01048 for Specific Plan DRC2008- 00940, Annexation DRC2005-00602, Development District Amendment DRC2005-00477, General Plan Amendment DRC2006-00030. BACKGROUND The Trail Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the trail plans for the proposed Carrari Ranch Project, the proposed development of 107 single-family lots within the Carrari Ranch Specific Plan area (342 acres), on August 12, 2009, November 17, 2009, and March 10, 2010 and provided comments to the applicant. The applicant has revised/responded to one of those comments. The March. 10, 2010 TAC Action agenda is attached. DESIGN PARAMETERS: The Carrari Ranch Specific Plan project area has a Regional Trail that traverses the site generally running east west and is proposing to share a section of the Almond Community Trail to improve an 800-foot section for a secondary access road. After the March 10, 2010 TAC meeting the applicant amended the plans to address the following concerns. Regional Trail: The applicant proposes to install section of the Regional Trail that is only 12 feet wide from the westerly tract boundary line to the easterly tract boundary line through the northerly end of the developed area along the private road, Delphin Place. The TAC provided comments regarding the off -site connections to the Regional Trail, driveway crossings, and the reduction of trail fencing. Additionally, staff noted the substandard width of the trail (minimum 30 feet) and the need to improve the Regional Trail to the property lines and not at the tract boundary. During the March 10, 2010 meeting, the applicant expressed willingness to reduce any driveway approach that crosses the Regional Trail to a 12 foot maximum, however, no change was made to the Specific Plan limiting the driveway approach size or number of driveway crossings: The committee also requested that the applicant provide details for the proposed trail fencing along the Regional Trail and for the trail improvements from the tract boundary to the property line of the ownership area. No new details were provided by the applicant. No changes have been made to the proposed Regional Trail as part of this re -submittal. Community Trail: At the March 10, 2010 TAC meeting the committee provided feedback requesting the applicant to clarify the crossing at the Almond Avenue and Gooseneck Road. The committee also requested that the applicant update the drawing of the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension culvert/bridge to indicate the changes made to the drawing presented at that meeting. The applicant has revised the plans for the proposed improvements.to the Thorpe Canyon culvert but did not address the crossing of Gooseneck Road and Almond Avenue. The Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Aesthetics/Light and Glare section (AES-2 Implementation of the project would degrade the visual character/quality of the site and its surroundings0 evaluated the Thorpe Canyon crossing and impacts associated with the project. The DEIR determined that the "community trail... (within the Thorpe Canyon area) would be adversely affected by construction of the off -site emergency access road and associated Thorpe Canyon culvert crossing." The DEIR found the impacts related to the Thorpe Canyon as well as the proposed grading of the site to be a Significant and Unavoidable Impact. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE REPORT TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 — MILLER DEVELOPMENT June 13, 2012 Page 2 STAFF COMMENTS: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Major Issues: Although the revised plans submitted for the TAC review addressed the Thorp Canyon Crossing no additional comments were addressed with this revised submittal. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee review the proposed trail layout and forward a negative recommendation to the Planning Commission for denial as it relates to the Tentative Tract Map. The Tentative Tract Map does not meet the intent of the General Plan, Hillside Grading Standards, Hillside Grading Ordinance, Equestrian Overlay requirement, Trail Implementation Plan, or the Land Development Review Design Guidelines. Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner Attachments: A — TAC Comments dated March 10, 2010 B — TAC Action Agenda dated March 10, 2010 C — Full set of plans 4 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET March 10, 2010 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO —A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74-acres for 110 single-family lots) generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -Influence. BACKGROUND: The Trail Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the trail plans for the proposed Carrari Ranch Project, the proposed development of 110 single-family lots within the Carrari Ranch Specific Plan area (342-acres), on August 12, 2009, and November 17, 2010, and provided comments to the applicant. The applicant has revised/responded to some of those comments and is requesting further feedback from the TAC on the project. The November 17, 2009, TAC Action agenda is attached. DESIGN PARAMETERS: The Carrari Ranch Specific Plan project area has a Regional Trail that traverses the site generally running east -west and is proposing to share a section of the Almond Community Trail to improve an 800-foot section for a secondary access road. After the November 17, 2009, TAC meeting, the applicant amended the plans to address the following concerns. Regional Trail: The applicant proposes to improve a 12-foot section of the Regional Trail from the westerly tract boundary line to the easterly tract boundary line through the northerly end of the developed area along the private road, Delphin Place. The TAC provided comments regarding the off -site connections to the Regional Trail, driveway crossings, and the reduction of trail fencing. Additionally, staff noted the substandard width of the trail (minimum 30 feet) and the need to improve the Regional Trail to the property lines and not at the tract boundary. No changes have been made to the proposed Region Trail as part of this re -submittal. Community Trail: The applicant has revised the plans for the proposed improvements to an 800-foot section of the Almond Trail for the proposed emergency secondary access road based on comments received at the November 17, 2009, TAC meeting. The TAC provided comments to the applicant regarding the visual impact to the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension, modifying the City trail standards, sharing the trail section for the secondary access, and equestrian safety with the proposed paving of the trail. The applicant has revised the design to accommodate both the 26-foot emergency access road and the 20-foot Community Trail. STAFF COMMENTS: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: Community Trail 1. The adjacent road/trail section should be revised to indicate the location of all improvements including the proposed trail fencing. The note on the plans state that trail fencing will be installed along the curb edge of the trail as requested by the TAC. The new cross section is shown on sheet 6 of 12 in the attached plans. EXHIBIT A 8-3 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET November 17, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EI R) DRC2004-01048 FOR ANNEXATION DRC2005-00602, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00477, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2005-00629, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00030, SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2008-00940 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. _ A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 110 single-family lots generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -Influence. BACKGROUND The Trail Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the trail plans for the proposed Carrari Ranch Project, the proposed development of 110 single-family lots within the Carrari Ranch Specific Plan area (342 acres), on August 12, 2009, and provided comments to the applicant. The applicant has revised/responded to those comments and is requesting further feedback from the TAC on the project. The TAC Action agenda is attached. DESIGN PARAMETERS: The Carrari Ranch Specific Plan project area has a Regional Trail that traverses the site generally running east west and is proposing to share a section of the Almond Community Trail to improve an 800-foot section for a secondary access road. After the August 12, 2009 TAC meeting the applicant amended the plans to address the following concerns. Regional Trail: The applicant proposes to improve a 12-foot wide section of the Regional Trail from the westerly tract boundary line to the easterly tract boundary line through the northerly end of the developed area along the private road, Delphin Place. The TAC provided comments regarding the off -site connections to the Regional Trail, driveway crossings, and the reduction of trail fencing. Additionally, staff noted the substandard width of the trail (minimum 30 feet wide) and the need to improve the Regional Trail to the property lines and not at the tract boundary. Community Trail: The applicant proposes to improve an 800-foot section of the Almond Trail for the proposed emergency secondary access road. The TAC provided comments regarding the visual impact to the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension, modifying the City trail standards, sharing the trail section for the secondary access, and equestrian safety with the proposed paving of the trail. Analysis : The applicant has responded to the comments that were identified (see attached letter Attachment C). STAFF COMMENTS: The following comments are intended to provide an outline for discussion purposes. Maior Issues: Community Trail 1. The applicant has revised the alignment of the secondary access road along an 800-foot portion of the Almond Trail to provide a 12-foot wide minimum trail surface as requested by the EXHIBIT - A 6-� P 0 /0 E._A/ TRAILS ADVISO FRY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET August 12, 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (E I R) DRC2004-01048 FOR ANNEXATION DR02005-00602, DEVELOPMENT DIS-rRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00477, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2005-00629, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00030, SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2008-00940 AND TENTAT-IVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 -MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. - A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 110 single-family lots), generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -influence. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project is generally located north of Reales Street avid west of Archibald Avenue within the City of Rancho Cucarnonga's Sphere -of -Influence. The Carrara Ranch project area is unimproved with dirt roads and easements that traverse the site. The site is designated Open Space and Hillside Residential within the General Plan and will be pre -zoned as part of the project, consistent with the General Plan designations. The .properties to the west and east are designated Open Space and Hillside Residential with minimal improvements and scattered single-family dwelling units. The property to the north is within the San Bernardino National Forest boundary and the properties .to the south are developed with single-family residential zoned Very Low Residential (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre). The subject Hillside Overlay District and has slopes in excess of 30 percent. property is within the The Almond Trail is located to the south of the project site and moves along through the Angalls Canyon and the adjoining Thorpe Canyon. This trail is considered one of the most scenic trails in itionally, the City and trail improvements were kept to a minimum to preserve the area. Adda proposed Regional Trail is located within the project site as indicated in the General Pla Improvement Plan. n and Trail DESIGN PARAMETERS: The project includes the proposed development of 110 single-family lots within the Carrari Ranch Specific Plan area (342 acres) and the annexation of approximately 670 acres of land. This project proposes to construct the Regional Trail through the project site and pave an approximately 800-foot section of the Almond Trail for a secondary access road. Regional Trail: The Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan (General Plan Exhibit III-13) shows a Regional Trail that traverses the site generally running east to west and then heads south along the westerly property line to the existing City limits south of the stream crossing. The trail then heads west across the Southern California Edison easement. The existing location of the Regional Trail follows service roads for the most part. The fire road terminates west of the subject project site, and the trail is lost at this point. Because of the possible constraints with topography, grade, and future extension, of the Regional Trail, it may be more appropriate to continue the Regional Trail along a U.S. Forest Service Fire Control road generally west of the proposed tract boundary. Since the General Plan is a policy document, the exact locations are typically determined as development occurs and ideal trail locations are analyzed. The applicant proposes to improve a 12-foot section of the Regional Trail from the westerly tract boundary line to the easterly tract boundary line through the northerly end of the developed area along the private road, Delphin Place. No improvements are proposed for the Regional Trail that extends from the tract boundary to the east and west property line. EXHIBIT - A 9-5- TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT August 12, 2009 Page 3 STAFF COMMENTS The following comments are intended to provide an outline for Committee discussion. Maior Issues: Community Trail: The alignment of the secondary access road along an 800-foot portion of the Almond Trail. The access road and trail will share the 26-foot wide right-of-way. The trail is proposed to be paved rwith an all-weather material that will be approved by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District (RCFD). The trail is. proposed as a 6-foot decomposed granite shoulder/trail. No trail fencing is proposed .between the paved access road and the trail within this section of the Community Trail. Additional grade information will be provided at the Trail Advisory Committee meeting. 2. The applicant proposes to install a bridge or culvert for a future Almond Street crossing of Thorpe Canyon and grade the ultimate right-of-way for a residential collector street. Staff has asked for a parkway community trail to be included on one side of Almond Street. The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) should consider whether a community trail along the street is needed, in addition to an existing trail that crosses the bottom of this canyon, and if so, would a 12-foot parkway trail without street trees suffice over the culvert or bridge. A vehicle gate with side access, per Standard Drawing 1006, would be appropriate at the south end of the emergency access road/private trail. 3. Consider requiring a concrete header between asphalt and decomposed granite and a minimum width of 10 feet clear of any fencing. Regional Trail: 1. The location of driveways that cross the regional trail and the proposed materials within the driveway crossing. There is a potential to have of up to 11 driveways intersecting this section of the trail. The Trails Advisory Committee should consider in its evaluation that Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16925 has been designed with lots that fronton to Del phin Place, which can create opportunities for driveway conflicts between horse riders and vehicles. 2. The TAC should review the design of the.Regional Trail as proposed. The proposed trail does not meet the minimum 30 feet in width and may exceed the maximum grades permitted. 3. The TAC should consider whether the applicant should continue the trail improvements forthe Regional Trail from the limits of the tract boundary extending both easterly and westerly to the property line. The plans indicate that this is an existing section of the Regional Trail. There are no improvements along this section of trail. 4. The TAC should consider realigning the location of the Regional Trail along the fire control road. If the applicant is required to improve the trail in the location as indicated within the Hiking and Riding Trails Master Plan (General Plan Exhibit I11-13), then the TAC should consider requiring a "Step Through," per Standard Drawing 1007, at the Delphin Place gated community entry instead of a man -gate. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 12, 2009, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell X Lou Munoz Antonio Karraa X Francisco Oaxaca II. NEW BUSINESS ACTION Pam Stewart (Alternate) X Larry Henderson Janet Ryerson (Alternate) X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) DRC2004-01048 FOR ANNEXATION DRC2005-00602, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00477, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2005-00629, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00030, SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2008-00940 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. —A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 110 single-family lots), generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -influence. Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner Action: Continued to the next TAC meeting September 9, 2009 to bring back additional information concerning the following: 1. Provide .drawings on visual impact of the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension culvert/bridge. 2. Provide map information on the north/south connections off site to the Regional (Front Line Fire Road) Trail. 3. Concern with modifying City Trail Standards for an entire Project including off site existing trail improvements, versus limited areas as in previous TAC reviews. 4. Concern with the requested shared north/south Almond Trail section the reduction .of the existing 15 foot wide dirt trail to a 6 foot wide DG and the potential for wash outs making it unusable. 5. Concern with the requested shared north/south Almond Trail section with paving safety for equestrian safety given the existing steep grade and the future maintenance contingent on an off site HOA. 6. The On -site Tract Regional Trail Driveway crossings, present a significant challenge and should be eliminated or reduced to the extent possible. 7. The regional trail fencing will also be reduced where there are driveway conflicts to provide line of site standards. Details concerning this reduction need to be analyzed. EXHIBIT - B - � �- t. � - � �� 9 " % Arch i.tectare+Pianning 1 -79 -n Fitch h'virle, CA c126111 C.nm October 28, 2009 Ms. Candyce Burnett Planning Division City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 RE: Carrari Ranch Trails Dear Candyce: This letter has been prepared in response to a request from the Trails Advisory Committee for additional information on the following items: 1. Provide drawings on visual impact of the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension culvert/bridge. Response No. L. This information is being prepared by the consulting firm PACE and will be provided to the City shortly under separate cover for review by the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) prior to the November 17 TAC meeting. 2. Provide map information on the north/south connections off -site to the Regional (Front Line Fire Road) Trail. Response No. 2: It is unclear which trail is being referenced. The City of Rancho Cucamonga Hiking & Equestrian Riding Map does not identify a north -south trail within the Carrari Ranch Specific Plan Area. 3. Concern with modifying City Trail Standards for an entire Project including all of the existing trail improvements, versus limited areas as in previous TAC reviews. Response No. 3: The off -site Almond Trail will be 12 feet in width per the TAC's request. The emergency access road shall be separated from the trail by the standard City equestrian fencing. EXHIBIT - C;c. M Ms. Candyce Burnett City of Rancho Cucamonga October 28, 2009 Page 3 of 3 If you have any questions or comments after reviewing this letter, please contact me. Thank you. Sincerely, Mark Hickner Director of Planning and Entitlement KTGY Group, Inc. mhickner@kt,,,,y.com CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA SPECIAL IMEETING TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 17, 2009 n 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell X Pam Stewart (Alternate) X Lou Munoz X Larry Henderson X Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) X Francisco Oaxaca X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) — Don Yoder (Bicycle Member) Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member Alternate) NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) DRC2004-01048 FOR ANNEXATION DRC20Q5-00602, DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AMENDMENT DRC2005-00477, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT DRC2005-00629, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT DRC2006-00030, SPECIFIC PLAN DRC2008-00940 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. — A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately 74 acres for 110 single-family lots), generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -Influence. Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner Committee Action: Continued to an unspecified future date (at Applicant's request) to revise plans consistent with TAC Comments as expressed by the committee members regarding the following concerns: 1. Applicant is reviewing the Culvert design and will revise the plans accordingly. 2. Clarify the crossing at Almond Avenue and Gooseneck Road. This crossing is addressed in the Specific Plan but should be represented on the Trail plans. 3. Expand the trail easement to the full 20 feet on the north/south Almond Trail section and provide a separate (no overlay) 26-foot easement for the secondary access road and amend plans to reflect the full width. 4. Concern with the substandard width of the on -site Regional Trail and the potential to have up to 11 driveway crossings. Consider narrowing driveway approaches, creating a signage program, other amenities including tie up area/rest areas, and utilizing a different pavement treatment within these driveway crossings. EXHIBIT — B c)_ 1 MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: February 22, 2010 RANCHO CUCAMONGA To: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner ?/'"_� From: Betty Miller, Associate Engineer`` Subject: Carrari Ranch Trail Issues, SUBTT16925 and DRC2008-00940 When the Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) reviews the exhibits provided for their meeting on March 10, please alert them the only thing that has changed since November is the off site easement configuration on sheet 6. 1 am repeating most of the topics in my November 16, 2009, memo that I think they should discuss: Proposed 12-foot regional trail section continues to follow Standard Drawing 1002-B, which is the bare minimum for a Community Trail. Most community trails are 20 feet wide, conforming to Standard Drawing 1002-A along street frontages or Standard Drawing 1004 between lots. The General Plan states (page III-159) regional multipurpose trails should be a minimum of 30 feet wide and only offers credit toward park dedication requirements if they have an additional 15 feet of landscaping (page III-160). 2. The Traffic Section has asked that driveway and intersection Lines of Sight be plotted along the proposed regional trail. At a minimum, when driveways cross trails the trail PVC fencing should be held back 50 feet on both sides of drive approaches. This could mean no fencing at all on ten lots (91, 94, 95, 97-100,105, 70 & 71) making a landscape buffer between the back of curb and the 12-foot trail and even more desirable. 3. The 46-foot "Adjacent Road/Trail Section" on sheet 6 has been revised. Now the proposal is to parallel the Community Trail, on the upstream side, with 2:1 slopes to daylight in an additional slope easement, shown draining across the graded shoulder. a. Developer shall obtain and record all necessary off site easements before the tentative tract map is scheduled for Planning Commission review. This will include street rights -of - way and the grading easement to install Almond Street across Thorpe Canyon from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and grading easements from properties on both sides of Almond east of the canyon. b. They propose to cross the existing Community Trail with asphalt at a 9.4% grade. c. Does the TAC want PVC fencing between the trail and emergency access roadway? d. It would have been nice if they had provided sheet 12 from the tentative tract plans, since it is referenced on the two detail sheets. TAC may want to see Sections C/12, D/12 and J/12. e. It would also be nice to see a section east of Thorpe Canyon. 4. The Specific Plan provides 5-foot level parkways on both sides of Delphin Place south of "A" Street. TAC should decide if this is sufficient for pedestrians for the 1800 feet between the gated entry and the regional trail. EXHIBIT - D 45,11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMM ITTEE'AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 10, 2010 @ 6:00 PM MAINS PROM 10500 CIVIC CENTER? DRIVE ACTION ROLL CALL: X Frances Howd shell X Janet Ryerson X Lou Munoz Kelly Mathen Alternate Francisco Oaxaca Alternate X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member X_.Larry Henderson A Don Yoder (Bicycle Member) Vacant X Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member Alternate NEW BUSINESS A. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925 - MILLER DEVELOPMENT CO. —A review of the trail plans for a section of the Almond Trail and the Regional Trail for the Carrari Ranch project (the proposed subdivision of approximately. 74-acres for 110 single-family lots), generally located north of the City boundary, north of Delphin Place and west of Archibald Avenue in the City's Sphere -of -Influence. Staff Planner: Candyce Burnett, Senior Planner; Betty Miller, Associate Engineer Action: Continued to an unspecified future date to bring back additional information concerning the following: 1. Provide a revised drawing of the Thorpe Canyon/Almond Avenue extension culvert/bridge (now 44 feet wide by 12 feet tall) to identify the changes made to the drawing presented at the November 17, 2009, TAC meeting. 2. Clarify the crossing at Almond Avenue and Gooseneck Road. This crossing should be represented on the Trail Plans, 3. There is a concern about modifying City Trail Standards for the Regional Trail within the project boundaries. The TAC discussed the proposed 12-foot width of the Regional Trail and that it is less than the minimum required for Community Trails. The TAC is recommending the trail meet the minimum City Standard for a Regional Trail. 4. The proposed driveway crossings along the Regional Trail. The applicant indicated that they were willing to reduce the driveway approach to the minimum 12 feet permitted by the City Standard. Provide a revised detail of the driveway crossings and pavement treatments or alternative material within these crossings. EXHIBIT � &-/,-?- TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA March 24, 2010 Page 2 5. Provide a detail of the proposed trail fencing along the Regional Trail. This detail will need to be analyzed to determine appropriate set back for line of site conflict. 6. Provide a detail of the improvements from the tract boundary to the property line of the current ownership area for the Regional Trail within the existing disturbed areas. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: This is the time and place for the general public to address. the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. The following members of the public provided comments on the project (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT16925), concerning- the issues on safety, and the importance of keeping to the City Standards for trail improvements: 1. Sandra & Glen Garza, 9493 Valley View Street, Alta Loma, CA 91737 2. Kathy Cameron, 9212 Cottonwood Way, Alta Loma, CA 91737 3. Mary Bullock, 6087 Burgundy Avenue, Alta Loma, CA 91737 4. Carlene Ariza, 8435 Pumalo Street, Alta Loma, CA 91701 5. Ken Douglass, 6147 Indigo, Alta Loma, CA 91701 IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT - 6:48 PM THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MAY 9, 2012 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Lou Munoz_ Frances Howdyshell _ Janet Ryerson_ Larry Henderson _ Bill Pallotto Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II II. NEW BUSINESS III A. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 - A request to abandon two portions of a trail that lead from the trail onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of the trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03, and 1061-031-04 �I III.' PUBLIC COMMENTS III This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 11 IV. ADJOURNMENT III 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 3, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET May 9, 2012 A. TRAIL ABANDONMENT DRC2009-00848 -A request to abandon two portions of a trail that lead from the trail onto Ranch Gate Road in the Very Low Residential District. The two portions of the trail are between 5272 and 5278 Ranch Gate Road and one completely on 5340 Ranch Gate Road - APN: 1061-021-02; 1061-021-03, and 1061-031-04 STAFF COMMENTS: The application for the trail abandonment was submitted November 5, 2009 and originally came before the Trails Committee on January 13, 2010. At the Trails Advisory Committee it was recommended for approval to the Planning Commission with the following Condition: 1. Applicant is required to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step -through for pedestrian and equestrian access. The applicant was not present to answer questions. At the November 10, 2010 Planning Commission meeting the application was continued to the December 8, 2010 meeting so that staff could research the actual cost for the improvements required by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) to improve the flood control corridor to the north of these properties to allow for the vacation of the two trail spurs and still allow two points of access to the trail behind the residences on Ranch Gate Road. Staff could not obtain the information by the December 8, 2010 meeting so it was continued to an unspecified date. Since that time staff has requested a list of items from the SBCFCD that would be required for the use of the flood control corridor to connect the trail that runs north and south behind the residences on the west side of Ranch Gate Road. The list is summarized from a letter dated May 26, 2011 as follows: 1. Existing MOU, dated May 4, 1993 be amended by the District. 2. Proposed step -through access points to bring the trail segment up to standard. 3. Southern California Edison approval and easement is required. 4. The District requires chain link fencing or other approved barrier to be installed along the west end of the Community Trail (due to liability concerns). 5. Bring existing, rough, rocky trail to Standard (re -grade and install DG dirt). SBCFCD required the permit to be filed and improvements to the area to be completed for the use of the corridor as a trail. The estimate for the cost of the improvements to the trail was determined to be approximately $107,000. The residents were concerned that with the original deposit of $10,000 this cost estimate is very substantial and ultimate costs could be even higher. This portion of the corridor is planned to be part of the Community Trail in the future. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Trails Committee rescind their recommendation to require the applicant to obtain the necessary permits and approvals from the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to remove the gate at the north end of the trail and replace it with a step -through for pedestrian and equestrian access. Staff also recommends approval of the vacation of the two trail legs with the condition that the existing north/south trail be restored and maintained in a usable condition. Staff Planner: Steve Fowler, Assistant Planner THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA APRIL 11, 2012 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California MEETING CANCELED NO ITEMS SUBMITTED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 5, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 1 of 1 THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MARCH 14, 2012 6:00 PM RANCHO Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California 1 I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call Lou Munoz_ Frances Howdyshell Janet Ryerson_ Larry Henderson _ Bill Pallotto _ Carol Douglass (Equestrian)_ Tom Tisler (Bicycle) _ Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) _ Kelly Matheny (Alternate) _ II II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III II III. NEW BUSINESS III A. A REVIEW OF TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS RELATED TO A PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 146,000 SQUARE FEET (3.4 ACRES) INTO FIVE (5) LOTS IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; APN: 0225-181-73. RELATED FILES: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18747; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00010, VARIANCE DRC2010-00963, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2010-00964. 11 IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS 11 This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA March 14, 2012 11 V. ADJOURNMENT III 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 7, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code Section 54964.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. 2 of 2 D p' w -L t0 I.. Grove — r •L,.,^._.o �•------ S pphire Val ! Camel!Fin V a 3 I j el man c s Hellm j ■ Arch! al Archib d ^__ J V/ Herm sa Hermo � ic Have Haven i i �, ■ o (o j �■ �■ c Millik n Milli en — — O ■ rMIL CD L TRohe 406 `D v ter V Day Creek i n� EP � ! O 0. Etiwan a East � O 3 W r. 1 ! ■ 3 n N 3 � + j r � — i i TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET March 14, 2012 A. A REVIEW OF TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS RELATED TO A A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 146,000 SQUARE FEET (3.4 IN THE VERY LOW (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETW J-C Lo(S ikm A P"EASTAV AC S EE CHOCTAW PLACE; APN: 0225-181-73. RELATED FILES: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18747; DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00010, VARIANCE DRC2010-00963, AND TREE REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2010-00964. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project area is a parcel of about 146,000 square feet (3.4 acres). The overall dimensions of the site are approximately 442 feet (east to west) by approximately 331 feet (north to south). The site is vacant. There are several trees at the west and south sides of the project site; low vegetation otherwise dominates the site. To the north, south, and west of the project site are single-family residences. To the east are a single-family residence and an operations facility for a telephone company. The zoning of the property and all surrounding properties is Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan. The subject property is generally level with a southeasterly slope; the elevations at the northwest and southeast corners are approximately 1,462 feet and 1,448 feet, respectively. An east -west Community Trail bounds the north perimeter of the project site. A north -south Local Feeder Trail bounds the west perimeter of the project site. Both trails were constructed with the corresponding residential subdivisions to the north (Tract 16116) and west (Tract 12870). BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes to construct a standard Local Feeder Trail 'loop' to connect to the trail system which will provide the future homeowners access to the City's trail network (Exhibit B). Starting clockwise at the northeast corner of the project site, the loop will connect directly to the aforementioned Community Trail that is located along the north perimeter of the project site. The alignment of the loop will be north -south along the east perimeter of the project site (east sides of Lots 2, 3, and 4). At the southeast corner of the project site the loop will 'turn' west and continue along the south perimeter of the of the project site (south side of Lot 4). The loop will then 'turn' northward at the common property line between Lots 4 and 5 and terminate at the proposed extension of Arapaho Drive. All lots will have direct access to the feeder trail except Lot 1 which will have direct access to the Community Trail. At.the southeast corner of Lot 2 a 'turnaround' will be provided to allow equestrian -related vehicles to enter and exit the feeder trail in a forward direction. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low (VL) Residential District, Etiwanda Specific Plan, within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails (private equestrian easements). The average lot size for the proposed project is 25,835 square feet, which exceeds the Development Code's requirement of 20,000 square feet to keep horses. Horse corral areas with the minimum 24 feet by 24 feet dimensions have been provided and are shown on Sheet A1.02. Each corral is provides a minimum 70' buffer between the nearest dwelling unit on adjacent properties as required by the Development Code. The proposed feeder trail will comply with the minimum technical and construction standards. To control access, at the intersection of the trail with Arapaho Road a widened entry, a gate, and a walk-through will be constructed per City standard. Similarly, at the intersection of the trail with the Community Trail a walk-through will be constructed per City standard (vehicle access onto the Community Trail is not permitted). The horse corral locations are immediately adjacent to the proposed trail that serves each. Along the side of, and parallel to, the trails will be a concrete swale for drainage purposes; these swales will not be within the trail itself and will be within a separate 5' TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW DRC2009-00010 AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18747 — K.U. & ASSOCIATES, INC. March 14, 2012 Page 2 wide easement (Exhibit C). Consistent with prior Trails Advisory Committee direction, a 6-foot high block wall will be provided on both sides of the trail (instead of white PVC trail fencing). Maior/Secondary Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. NONE Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. 1. The depth of the concrete swales shall not exceed 6-inches. 2. A culvert shall be provided where water must be conveyed from one side of the trail to the other side, i.e. at the concrete swale/trail intersections located at the southwest and southeast corners of Lot 4. 3. The slope along the west side of the trail on the west side of Lot 4 shall be landscaped with ground cover for erosion control; the use of decomposed granite on the slope is not permitted. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff requests that the Trails Advisory Committee review the proposed trail layout and provide input and direction. Staff Planner: Mike Smith, Associate Planner Attachments: A — Copy of Plans B - Site Plan (with Existing and Proposed Trail Highlighted) C — Trail Section COPY OF PLANS: LARGE ROLL DISTRIBUTED ALONG WITH PACKET EXHIBIT A IfAA—ew (eoe) are eAuwoa (eoe> :vA (gr",�NrN 30VMM W ON WW 1rflLd3= 9 A iw roa�u 1mim - �: wou VLLN3 owdww ��u SLioan � g " i gg9 `sjgg� gg 5� a ci 8�ba�g�� LiZQ•� Ce 1 1 � I � tl� @�Re�� m_ Ili �� e .rm aree�e3= f �x • A . A PA PROPOSED 5` DRAINAGE EASE�Er� j , i 1 PROPOSED 15.0' EQUESTAIN TRAIL I PROPOSED 6' HIGH 1 BLOCK WALL I PROFI.O' SED 6` HIGH :BLOCK WALL � 1 1 1 _ o 0 1.OX FAIN. PROPOSED CONC, DITCH EXHIBIT C THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA _ MARCH 14, 2012 - 6:00 PM Rancho Cucamonga Civic Center Rains Room 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, California I. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call 6:00 PM Lou Munoz A Frances Howdyshell X Janet Ryerson X Larry Henderson X Bill Pallotto A Carol Douglass (Equestrian) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle) A Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) X Kelly Matheny (Alternate) II II. ANNOUNCEMENTS III None III. NEW BUSINESS Approved as A. A REVIEW OF TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS RELATED TO A recommended and PROPOSAL TO SUBDIVIDE A VACANT PARCEL OF ABOUT 146,000 added conditions for SQUARE FEET (3.4 ACRES) INTO FIVE (5) LOTS IN THE VERY LOW doublewide access (VL) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED gates on Lots 2-5. AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST They also recommended the AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE; APN: 0225-181-73. RELATED realignment of the FILES: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18747; DEVELOPMENT vehicle access gate REVIEW DRC2009-00010, VARIANCE DRC2010-00963, AND TREE on the cul de sac REMOVAL PERMIT DRC2010-00964. street. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS 11 None This is the time and place for the general public to address the committee. Items to be discussed here are those that do not already appear on this agenda. 1 of 2 TRAILS ADVISORY _COMMITTEE_ AGENDA March 14, 2012 11 V. ADJOURNMENT III 2 of 2 6:38 PM CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2012, @ 6:00 PM RAINS CONFERENCE ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Larry Henderson Bill Pallotto Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) MEETING CANCELED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBMITTALS 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 2, 2012, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2012 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Larry Henderson Bill Pallotto NEW BUSINESS Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) A. TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IV. ADJOURNMENT 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 5, 2012 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. STAFF REPORT -PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date: January 11, 2012 To: Trails Advisory Committee From: Larry Henderson, AICP, Principal Planner/Trails Coordinator Subject: TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW DRC2011-01126 BACKGROUND: A. Trail Priorities: The City's Trails Implementation Plan adopted in 1991 sets forth trail improvement priorities which are to be reviewed each year to adjust priority based upon urgency, availability of funding, and revised cost estimates. In 2010, following receipt of priority comments from the Alta Loma Riding Club (ALRC), the Engineering Department proposed a multiyear priority list which was approved (Exhibit A). Because of favorable construction bidding, many projects were completed prior to the review of the 2010 list. After the Trails Advisory Committee met on October 13, 2010, the recommendations were considered by the Engineering Department and their recommendations were forwarded back to the Trails Committee. The Trails Committee reported on their action for the consideration of the Parks and Recreation Commission then subsequently to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission's action was then forwarded to the City Council as part of the City Engineer's Annual Budget recommendations. However because of budget constraints no Projects were funded in the 2011-2012 City Budget. The previous recommended priorities appear valid with one recommended addition. In 2011 a resident of Whirlaway Street near Archibald Avenue requested that a continuation of the Archibald Community Trail from the existing trail at the northern portion of the lot on Norbrook should be extended north to the north end of the lot at Carrari Street. This section on the west side of Archibald Avenue would then complete the Archibald Community Trail connection to the lower Almond Community Trail parallel to Carrari Street. The requested addition would be very beneficial from a public safety stand point and from a maintenance cost reduction aspect (by removing City Maintained Landscaping). B. Funding: Trail projects are generally funded as Capital Improvement Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding the proposed trail priorities as modified to the Parks and Recreation Commission and subsequently forward to the Planning Commission, the City Engineer, and City Council as part of the 2012-2013 budget process. Respectfully Submittd, Larry nderson, AICP T Principal Planner/Trails Coordinator LH/Is TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW DRC2011-01126 January 11, 2012 Page 2 Attachment: Exhibit A — Engineering Staff Report dated November 10, 2010 C: Mark Steuer, City Engineer Jerry Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer . STAFF REPORT ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT Date: November 10, 2010 To: Trails Advisory Committee Members From: Mark A. Steuer, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer By: Jerry A. Dyer, Senior Civil Engineer Subject: TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW RECOMMENDATION ` I RANCHO CUCAMONGA It is recommended that the Trails Advisory Committee approve the trail priorities for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 through 2014/2015. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The following trails are budgeted and either complete or will be constructed and completed this fiscal year: FY 2009/2010 — Past 1. Banyan Street from Hellman Avenue to Amethyst Street — Trail on the north side. Completed December 2009. 2. Pacific Electric Trail Phase IV from Grove Avenue to Amethyst Street — Construction started back in September 2009 and by early 2010 was substantially complete and open to the public. Note, the old railroad bridge was removed in July 2010 and this section of the trail closed. However, the construction of the new pedestrian bridge over Foothill Boulevard started in October 2010 with completion expected by mid summer 2011. 3. Wilson Avenue from Carnelian to existing trail west of Buckthorn — Completed May 2010. 4. Beryl Street from north of Banyan Street up to Wilson Avenue — Trail on the east side. Completed May 2010. 5. Banyan Street from Beryl Street to Hellman Avenue — Trail on the north side and continuation of Trail No. 1 listed above. Completed July 2010. 6. Wilson Avenue from Amethyst Street to Morning Canyon — Trail fencing for the existing trail on the south side of the street. Completed July 2010. FY 2010/2011 -Current 7. Hermosa Avenue from south of Oak Grove to Coca Street — Trail on the west side. The trail would link to Trail No. 6 listed above and the regional trail to the east along the north side of the flood basins. Should be out to bid in December with construction late winter to early spring 2011. The following trails are proposed for the upcoming fiscal years: TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT PAGE 2 Re: Approve the trail priorities for Fiscal Year 2010/2011 through 2014/2015 November 10, 2010 FY 2011/2012 8. Banyan Street from Carnelian Street to Beryl Street — Trail on the north side and continuation of Trail No. 5 and linking to Trail No. 4 listed above and Trail No. 9 below. Note, the northwest corner is undeveloped and therefore would not be a part. That portion of the trail would be constructed upon development. FY 2012/2013 9. Carnelian Street from Banyan Street to Wilson Avenue — Trail on the west side and continuation of Trail No. 8 above and linking to Trail No. 3 above at Wilson Avenue. FY 2013/2014 10. Banyan Street from Sapphire Street to Carnelian Street — Trail on the north side and continuation of Trail No. 8 above and linking to the existing trail from Sapphire Street west. FY 2014/2015 11. Haven.Avenue from Wilson Avenue to Vivienda — Trail on the west side and continuation of the existing trail on Haven south of Wilson. All of the above is dependent on available funding. Respectfully submitted, C-�--M-are. Steuer Director -of Engineering Services/City Engineer MAS:JAD Attachment CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 11, 2012 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1. ROLL CALL: x Frances Howdyshell A Lou Munoz x Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) x Larry Henderson A Bill Pallotto II. NEW BUSINESS ACTION x Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) x Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) x Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) x Jerry Dyer, Sr. Civil Engineer A. TRAIL PRIORITIES ANNUAL REVIEW ACTION The Trails Advisory Committee recommended that the Engineering Department recommendations presented at the meeting be forwarded to the Planning Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission with a change in priority, i.e., move the Haven Avenue and Archibald Avenue trail sections to the top of the priority list. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. None IV. ADJOURNMENT 6:38 PM 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2011 @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10600 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE MEETING CANCELED FOR LACK OF SUBMITTALS x I PiAom � 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on December 7, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2011, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE NO ITEMS SUBMITTED MEETING CANCELED 1, Lois J. Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on November 3, 2011 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JULY 13, 2011, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM -- - - 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Janet Ryerson Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Larry Henderson Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) Bill Pallotto II. NEW BUSINESS A. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00032 - AFSHIN ETEBAR - Architectural review for 12 single-family residences related to Tentative Tract Map 16867 located in the Very Low Residential District (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the 210 Freeway - APN: 0225-161-29 through 40. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867, Variance DRC2011-00161 and Minor Exception DRC2011-00162. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on July 7, 2011 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET July 13, 2011 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2011-00032 - AFSHIN ETEBAR - Architectural review for 12 single-family residences related to Tentative Tract Map 16867 located in the Very Low Residential District (.1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue, north of the 210 Freeway - APN: 0225-161-29 through 40. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867, Variance DRC2011-00161 and Minor Exception DRC2011-00162. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The 8.9 acre project site is located on the west side of Etiwanda Avenue and north of the 210 freeway and is approved for a 12 lot subdivision (SUBTT16867 — approved January 25, 2006). The site is located within the Very Low Development District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and within the Equestrian Overlay District. The site drains roughly north to south and is bordered by single-family residences to the north, east and west and by the 210 freeway to the south. Street improvements and the 210 freeway sound wall have been completed. Each lot, except for Lot 12, will have direct access to a private equestrian trail. The tract map was approved with a 15-foot wide private equestrian trail along the west property line of Lot 1, a 20-foot wide private equestrian trail along the south property line of Lots 1 through 11 and a 25- foot wide private equestrian trail which transitions to a 15-foot wide community trail along the east property line of Lot 11. With the development of the site, there will be back-to-back 15-foot wide private equestrian trails adjacent to Lot 1. BACKGROUND: Staff can find no record of approved Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16867 ever having been reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee. ANALYSIS: The two unresolved issues are the location of the corral areas and the materials used for wall and fences adjacent to the private equestrian trails. The applicant proposes separating the corrals from the private equestrian easement with a 2:1 slope and placing a 6-foot high metal fence along the trail easement. The approved tentative tract map shows the corral areas adjacent to the equestrian trail and a solid block wall along the trail easement. The Trails Advisory Committee has a stated preference of locating corrals adjacent to the trail easement for easier access and maintenance of the corrals. The Design Review Committee has informed staff that they require a 6-foot high decorative block wall along private equestrian trails on all projects. A second issue regarding the trail fencing is whether equestrian trail fencing should be provided to separate the two 15-foot wide trail easements adjacent to Lot 1 (also shown on the approved tentative tract map). Staff feels that the trail fencing is necessary to delineate the boundaries of the two trails. The applicant has informed staff that they feel that the proposed corral locations are superior in that they provide the homeowner's that do not keep horses with a larger rear yard area that is undivided by a 2:1 slope or retaining wall. Additionally, they feel that a block wall along the equestrian trail is unnecessary due to the 14-foot high sound wall that is on the opposite side of the trail. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee provide input to the Design Review Committee as to their preference regarding the location of the corral areas and of type of walls/fences along the trail easement. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit A — Full Sized Set of Engineering and Landscaping Plans CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 8, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Janet Ryerson Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Larry Henderson . Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) Bill Pallotto MEETING CANCELED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBMITTALS 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on June 2, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MAY 11, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Larry Henderson Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) Bill Pallotto MEETING CANCELED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBMITTALS 1, Lois Schrader, Planning Commission Secretary for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on May 4, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION I. ROLL CALL: A Frances Howdyshell x Janet Ryerson x Lou Munoz Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) x Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) x Larry Henderson x Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) x Bill Pallotto Also in attendance were: Rob Ball, Fire Marshall; Dianna Lee, Fire Safety Council; and Chris Courtney representing K. Hovnanian (present via teleconference) II. NEW BUSINESS A. REVIEW OF TRAIL PLANS AND RELATED FENCE DETAILS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00028 - K. HOVNANIAN COMMUNITIES INC. - Architectural and site review for 63 single-family residences on 45.23 acres within the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), located on south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue — APN's: 0225-191-12 and 0226-102-02. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and SUBTT18708. On August 9, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and on April 15, 2010, for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18708. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Action: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended approval of the project with the following changes. The drainage facility adjacent to the equestrian trail shall have a maximum depth of 4 inches and a width of 4 feet. 2. The applicant shall provide a detail of the equestrian trail drainage facility where it transitions from a 4-foot wide open V-ditch to an underground drainage pipe. The area surrounding this point of transition shall be protected to prevent injury to pedestrians and horses using the trail. 3. The property line wall adjacent to the equestrian trail shall be on the homeowner's backyard side of the drainage facility. 4. The rear property line walls shall have decorative pilasters at the corners of each lot and on either side of the access gates. All walls shall use tan colored block with decorative caps. The decorative caps shall be wider than the block used to construct the walls. Split faced surfaces shall be on the pubic (trails and streets) viewable side of all walls. 5. The trail access gates shall have a view obscuring backing. 6. The gates and equestrian step -troughs at the ends of the private feeder trails shall be constructed per Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1006-C. Adjust all Trail Easements on the Tract Map to conform to this standard. 7. Provide a detail of the manhole cover that is in the middle of the Community Trail adjacent to Lot 7 of Tract Map 18708. The manhole cover should either be rubberized or be imbedded with decomposed granite. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION - None This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT — 6:40 p.m. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, APRIL 13, 2011, @ 6:00 PM RAINS CONFERENCE ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Larry Henderson Bill Pallotto II. NEW BUSINESS Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) A. REVIEW OF TRAIL PLANS AND RELATED FENCE DETAILS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00028 - K. HOVNANIAN COMMUNITIES INC. - Architectural and site review for 63 single-family residences on 45.23 acres within the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), located on south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue — APN's: 0225-191-12 and 0226-102-02. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and SUBTT18708. On August 9, 2006, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was adopted by the Planning Commission for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and on April 15, 2010, for Tentative Tract Map SUBTT18708. The California Environmental Quality Act provides that no further environmental review or Negative Declaration is required for subsequent projects or minor revisions to projects within the scope of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ill. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 1, Denise Sink, Office Specialist II for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on April 6, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. M=&KKnK@ DHM0�0@1k] CLERICAL REQUEST FORM TYPE OF DOCUMENT: (Check One) Staff Reports/Resol. Letter(s) X Memo(s) Plan Check Home Improvement CDBG Form(s) Other SUBJECT: DRC2011-00028 — TAC Report f FOUND IN THE I DRIVE AS: L•\PLANNING\Tabe\DRC2011-00028 Trails Com.doc SUBMITTED BY: Tabe van der Zwaag DATE SUBMITTED: 3/21/11 DATE NEEDED: APPROVED FOR FINALING: 6 FINAL APPROVED: COPIES TO (please include ad ewe� 3 i, //, Check box if a list is attached ❑ FOR CLERICAL USE ONLY Directory\File Name: Typist: � ��'�- G'�,�.�`er-�a 9. •moo LS t I- 600a� Date: �11 TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET APRIL 13, 2011 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW - REVIEW OF TRAIL PLANS AND RELATED FENCE DETAILS FOR DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN REVIEW DRC2011-00028- K. HOVNANIAN COMMUNITIES INC. - Architectural and site review for 63 single-family residences on 45.23 acres within the Very Low Residential District (1-2 dwelling units per acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan (ESP), located on south side of Banyan Street, approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue — APN's: 0225-191-12 and 0226-102-02. Related File: Tentative Tract Map SUBTT17651 and SUBTT18708. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The 45.23 acre project site is located on the south side of Banyan Street and approximately 1,220 feet east of East Avenue and is made up of two approved Tract Maps for a total of 63 lots (SUBTT17651 — 56 lots on 40 acres and SUBTT18708 — 7 lots on 5 acres). The site is located within the Very Low Development District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and within the Equestrian Overlay District. The site drains roughly north to south and is bordered by sparsely developed lots and a Eucalyptus windrow to the west, by a vacant lot to the south that is in the process of being subdivided for residential purposes (SUBTT18122) and by San Bernardino flood control land to the west. BACKGROUND: The Trails Advisory Committee (TAC) reviewed the project on July 12, 2006 (SUBTT17651) and on August 13, 2008 (SUBTT18708). The TAC approved the trail layouts for each Tract Map, though, in the reports, staff recommended that the Committee review the final grade percentages and construction details. The Applicant is now in the process of seeking approval of the house product and final grading for both tracts. Staff is bringing the final trail designs to the TAC for review. ANALYSIS: The approved tracts have a Community Trail running along the perimeter of the site (north, south, east, and west), with each residence either backing up to a 20-foot wide Community Trail or a 15-foot wide Local Feeder Trail. The project has been designed to meet all of the technical requirements for trails, including trail widths, grading, and trail fencing. The only unresolved issue is the type of fencing to be used along the Local Feeder Trails. It has been City policy to require decorative solid block walls with metal gates along the trails. The applicant has proposed 2-foot high solid walls topped with 4-foot high tubular steel fencing along with tubular steel gates (Landscape Plan page L7). Staff has informed the applicant that the Committee may consider a combination 3-foot high block wall topped by 3-foot tube metal fencing with pilasters (pilasters.to be located at property corners and at gate opening). Additionally, the tubular steel fencing and gate should be constructed to City'standards (Engineering Department Standard Drawing 608). RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee approve the trail design as presented and give staff direction on the type of fencing along the Local Feeder Trails that would be acceptable. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit A — Full Sized Set of Engineering and Landscaping Plans Exhibit B — TAC Staff Report and Action Agenda dated July 12, 2006 and August 8, 2008. Exhibit C — Engineering Department Standard Drawing 608 r TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET July 12, 2006 NEW BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 — TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 41 undeveloped acres of land into 56 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), located south of Banyan Street and east of East Avenue - APN: 225-191-12. Related Files: Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00174 SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The 41 acre site is predominantly sparse vegetation and mature Eucalyptus trees. The project site drains to the southeast. To the north, south, east, and west are vacant parcels. To the northwest is the Summit Intermediate School. All properties to the north, south, east and west are zoned Very Low Residential (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). BACKGROUND: This tract was originally reviewed by the Trails Advisory Committee on April 12, 2006. The Committee recommended approval subject to approval of a trail fencing plan prior to any houses being approved. Subsequently, the subdivision layout has been significantly redesigned in order to accommodate potential future development to the east. Street 'A' has been shifted to the east tract boundary and it's "dogleg" eliminated in favor of a cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac lot layouts have also been modified which, when combined with the deletion of the "dogleg" in Street 'A', improves horse keeping by eliminating the problematic rear yard -to -side yard lot relationships that create challenges in complying with the 70-foot horse setback. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low Residential District within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails (private equestrian easements) on a minimum average lot size of 22,500 square feet. The average lot size proposed for the project is 25,039 square feet, hence, lot sizes are large enough for horse keeping. The local equestrian system provides access to the rear (or side) of the lot from the Local Feeder Trail and access for trail riders from the local trail to the Community Trail. This provides a convenient path of travel for short Local Trail rides. The trail system is designed with local 15-foot Local Feeder Trails that connect the rear of each lot to the proposed 20-foot Community Trail that runs along Banyan Street, on the west side of proposed street "E Street", and on proposed "F street" to the south. All interior, local trails will have a 6-foot high tubular steel fencing. The project has been designed to meet all of the technical requirements for trails. Where applicable, 45-degree corner cut-offs have been provided at all corners. All future corrals (24 feet by 24 feet) have been placed 70 feet or greater from future dwelling units on adjacent lots. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Trails Committee review the proposed trail layout, and provide input and direction on the following issues: 1. Provide City Standard "Unauthorized Vehicles Prohibited" signs at each street trail connection. The minimum dimension between the wood posts for a step -through detail is 18 inches clear minimum between posts and maximum 14 inches above EXHIBIT B TRAILS COMMITTEE COMMENTS SHEET TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651— TAVA DEVELOPMENT CO. July 12, 2006 Page 2 grade. Also, the spacing of the step -through posts is from the centerline of the opening in all cases. Refer to either Standard Plan Drawing #1007 — Community Trail, or Standard Plan Drawing #1006-B for detail on the transition. 2. A detailed plan indicating trail widths, maximum slopes, physical conditions, fencing, and weed control, in accordance with City Master Trail drawings, shall be submitted for City Trails Coordinator review and approval prior to approval and recordation of the Final Tract Map and prior to approval of street improvement and grading plans. Developer shall upgrade and construct all trails, including fencing and drainage devices, in conjunction with street improvements. a. Local Feeder Trails (i.e., private equestrian easements) shall, at a minimum, be fenced with two -rail, 4-inch PVC fence to define both sides of the easement; in accordance with city standard drawing 1010-A; however, developer may be required to upgrade to an alternate fence material. b. Local Feeder Trail entrances shall also provide access at all street connections accept Banyan Street for service vehicles, such as veterinarians or hay deliveries, including a 12-foot minimum drive approach. Entrance shall be gated provided that equestrian access is maintained through step- throughs. C. Local Feeder Trail grades shall not exceed 0.5 percent at the downstream end of a trail for a distance of 25 feet behind the public right-of-way line to prohibit trail debris from reaching the street. Drainage devices may be required by the Building Official d. For single family residential development within the Equestrian/Rural Overlay District, at least one model home shall be provided with a constructed 24-foot by 24-foot corral with appropriate fencing. 3. All trail surfacing shall be of decomposed granite with 4 inch minimum base. Remove rocks and debris and grade surface smooth. The decomposed granite shall be the complete width of the trail up to the property boundary. No gaps allowing weeds to grow shall be allowed. 4. Where trail gradient exceeds 4 percent, water bars are required and shall be reviewed and approved by the Trails Advisory Committee. 5. Trail grade percentages and construction details concerning v-gutters and swales has not been provided. Said details need to be reviewed and approved by the Trails Advisory Committee. Staff Planner: Lou LeBlanc, Assistant Planner Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Site Utilization Map Exhibit "B" - Conceptual Master Plan showing trails Exhibit "C" - Tract Map CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, July 12, 2006, @ 6:00 PM RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE Action Agenda I. ROLL CALL: X Carlson X Fletcher X Henderson A Karraa I1. NEW BUSINESS NONE. X McPhail Resigned July 12, 2006 Zupke N/A Dickey (Alternate) N/A Stewart (Alternate) III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT17651 - TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 41 undeveloped acres of land into 56 single-family lots in the Very Low Residential District (A to 2 dwelling units per acre), located south of Banyan Street and east of East Avenue -APN: 0225-191-012. Related File: Tree Removal Permit DRC2006-00174. ACTION: Approved as recommended. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET August 13, 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18708 — TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 5.02 gross acres of land into 7 lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east of East Avenue and on the south side of Banyan Street and within the Etiwanda Specific Plan - APN: 0226-102-02. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The 5.02-acre site is predominated by sparse native vegetation and drains roughly from north to south. The same developer has an approved 56-lot subdivision (SUBTT17651) to the east, and the site will share a street with that development. There are vacant lots to the north and south and San Bernardino Flood Control property to the east. The properties to the north, south, and west are zoned Very Low Residential (VL) (.1-2 dwelling units per acre). The property to the east is zoned Open Space (OP). BACKGROUND: The applicant proposes a Local Feeder Trail that will run along the south and east property lines of the proposed 7-lot subdivision. The proposed trail will provide the future homeowners access to the Community Trail that is planned to run along the north property line of the proposed subdivision to the southwest and along the west property line of the approved subdivision to the west. The Equestrian Trail Master Plan (General Plan Exhibit III-13) shows a Community Trail along the south property line of the subject site which is planned to continue east to cross the San Bernardino County Flood Control District (SBCFCD) channel with a bridge and connect to an existing trail on the east side of the SBCFCD property. ANALYSIS: The proposed subdivision is located in the Very Low Residential District within the Equestrian Overlay District, which requires the development of Local Feeder Trails (private equestrian easements). The average lot size for the proposed project is 29,412 square feet, which exceeds the Development Code's requirement of 20,000 square feet to keep horses. The local equestrian system provides access to the rear (or side) of the lot from the Local Feeder Trail and access for trail riders from the Local Trail to the Community Trail. This provides a convenient path of travel for short Local Trail rides. The proposed trail system was designed with a 15-foot Local Feeder Trail that will connect the rear yard of each lot and run along the east and south property lines of the site and connect with a proposed 20-foot Community Trail. This Community Trail will eventually connect to the Community Trail that will run along the south side of Banyan Street. Additionally, when the lot to the north of the site is developed, the proposed Local Feeder Trail will be extended to directly connect to the Banyan Street Community Trail. The applicant is requesting that the proposed Community Trail end at their west property line and transition into a Local Feeder Trail. They feel that it is highly unlikely that the proposed Community Trail will ever be built across the flood control property and that when all the adjacent parcels are developed, that the future homeowners with have easy access to the Community Trail system. An additional issue is that the Cucamonga Valley Water District is requiring a manhole cover to be located within their Local Feeder Trail. They are proposing to add a layer of decomposed granite to the manhole cover to make it indistinguishable from the surrounding trial. TRAILS COMMITTEE COMMENTS SHEET SUBTT18708 — TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANTY August 13, 2008 Page 2 Staff has informed the applicant that they will be required to construct a corner cutoff at the southeast corner of Lot 7 in order for equestrian service vehicles to access the rear of each lot. Additionally, they will need to provide a vehicle turn around at the rear of Lot 1 where the trail dead ends into the undeveloped lot to the north. The applicant has stated that they are agreeable to each of these conditions. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Trails Advisory Committee review the proposed trail layout and provide input and direction on the following issues: Whether it is acceptable for the proposed Community Trail to end at the west property line of the applicant's site or whether the applicant should continue the trail along their south property line to dead end into their east property line. The applicant would rather have the narrower Local Feeder Trail run along their south property line in order to give the future developer of Lot 7 more flexibility in the ultimate layout of the home on that lot. If the Committee agrees that changing the Equestrian Trail Master Plan map is appropriate, the map will be modified to reflect the change with the General Plan update which is currently underway. 2. Whether it is acceptable to have a manhole cover within the trail. 3. That a vehicle cutoff be provided at the southwest corner of Lot 7 and that a vehicle turnaround be provided at the rear of Lot 1. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Attachments: A - Full set of plans B - Equestrian Trail Master Plan Map (showing proposed site) CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA COMMITTEE AGENDA TRAILS ADVISORY WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 13, 2008, @ 6:00 P.M. RAINS ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ACTION AGENDA ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Pam Stewart (Alt.) X_ (Planning Commissioner) (Planning Commissioner) Luis Munoz A (Planning Commissioner) Larry Henderson X (Planning/Principal Planner) Carol Douglas A (Equestrian Member) Vacant Parks and Rec. Commissioner II. NEW BUSINESS I 'i -Eelkl� Martin Dickey (Alt.) (Parks and Rec Commissioner) Bicycling Member (Alt.) Vacant Antonio Karraa A Parks and Rec. Commissioner A. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBTT18708 -TAVA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - A request to subdivide 5.02 gross acres of land into 7 lots in the Very Low Residential District (less than 2 dwelling units per acre), located east of East Avenue and on the south side of Banyan Street and within the Etiwanda Specific Plan - APN: 0226-102-02. ACTION: The Committee recommended that the applicant redesign the proposed 7-lot subdivision in order to incorporate 20-foot wide Community Trials adjacent to the south and east property lines of the site. The applicant will be required to provide 12 feet of the Community Trail along the south property line, with the remaining 8 feet provided by the property owner to the south when that site is developed. The applicant agreed to redesign the east property line Community Trail to eliminate the drainage -channel that was originally planned to run adjacent to the east side of the trail. Additionally, the applicant agreed to provide a corner cutoff at the southeast corner of Lot 7 and a vehicle turnaround at the northeast corner TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE ACTION AGENDA August 13, 2008 Page 2 of Lot 7. The Committee agreed to allow the applicant to place a manhole cover (with decomposed granite glued to the cover) within the trail easement as the Cucamonga Water District found all other placement locations unacceptable. Staff was directed to work with the applicant to provide direction on the location of a drive access to the future trail from the public street for trail maintenance purposes. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION None received. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. WELD 0.188" FLAT CAPON POST TOP OF PANEL TO BE FLUSH WITH TOP OF POST 36. - ►� 12 �-- TYPICAL FENCE ELEVATION 3/4" SQ. SOLID PICKET 3 HEAVY DUTY SELF CLOSING HINGES TAPER TOP OF FOOTI AT POST LOCATIONS TYPICAL WALK GATE NOTES: 2" SO. X .188" TOP RAIL 2" SO. X .188" POST 3/4" SQ. SOLID PICKETS 2" SQ. X .188" BOTTOM RAIL CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY STANDARD FINISH SOIL GRADE R TOP OF FOOTING DST LOCATIONS 2" SQ. X .188" ALL SIDES I" X .25" DIAGONAL, TACK WELD TO EACH PICKET HEAVY DUTY HASP LATCH CONCRETE HEADER PER CITY STANDARD 4" CLEAR (TYP.) FINISH SOIL GRADE P.C.C. 1. ALL FENCE MEMBERS SHALL BE TUBULAR OR SOLID STEEL STOCK OR AS NOTED ABOVE. 2. FABRICATE PANELS AS A UNIT, WELD AND GRIND SMOOTH ALL JOINTS. 0 3. APPLY ZINC -RICH PRIME COAT AFTER WELDING PANELS TO POSTS. CLEAN AND GRIND SMOOTH, o TOUCH UP PRIME COAT. N 4. APPLY 2 COATS SEMI -GLOSS RUST RESISTANT ENAMEL AFTER FENCE OR GATE ERECTION. COLOR PER PROJECT PLANS. IN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA APPROVED BY, STANDARD PLAN o TUBULAR STEEL FENCE 608 UJ CITY ENGINEER DATE USE WITH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION R.C.E. 24953 _ SHEET 1 OF 1 EXH_lBlT.'C___. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: X Frances Howdyshell X Lou Munoz A Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) X Larry Henderson A Bill Pallotto II. NEW BUSINESS ACTION A Janet Ryerson X Kelly Matheny (Alternate) X Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) X Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) mm A. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012-ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC— Review of the Almond Trail improvements associated with the architectural and site review of a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building, and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (0.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District - APN: 1061-501-03. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Action: The Trails Advisory Committee recommended approval of the project with the following conditions: 1) that the Community Trail and public right-of-way have a maximum cross -slope grade of 4 percent or less; 2) that the applicant will work with the Engineering Department to rework the trail entrance to the west of the existing driveway to the applicant's property, and 3) Staff members are to Work with Public Works, Engineering and San Bernardino County Flood Control District to determine the best way to transition from the existing Demens Channel Trail to the Almond Trail. III. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION: This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. IV. OLD BUSINESS - None V. ADJOURNMENT — 6:28 p.m. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE ROLL CALL - Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Larry Henderson Bill Pallotto NEW BUSINESS M Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) A. HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW DRC2008-01012 -ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC— Review of the Almond Trail improvements associated with the architectural and site review of a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building, and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (0.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District - APN: 1061-501-03. PUBLIC COMMUNICATION This is the time and place for the general public to address the Trails Advisory Committee. Items to be discussed here are those which do not already appear on this agenda. 1, Denise Sink, Office Specialist ll for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on March 3, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENT SHEET MARCH 9, 2011 HILLSIDE DESIGN REVIEW - DRC2008-01012 - ANDRESEN ARCHITECTURE, INC — Review of the Almond Trail improvements associated with the architectural and site review of a 11,906 square foot single-family residence, an attached 1,668 square foot RV garage, a 1,359 square foot detached garage, a 2,101 square foot detached equestrian/storage/workshop building and multiple deck/patio areas totaling 5,339 square feet on a 12.42-acre lot located at the northwest corner of Amethyst Avenue and Almond Street on a site that is encompassed by the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 to 2 dwelling units per acre), Flood Control (FC) District and Open Space (OS) District - APN: 1061-501-03. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The project site is located on the north side of Almond Street at the top of Amethyst Avenue on a 12.42-acre site. The site is made up of multiple zoning districts, with the developable portion of the site (Very Low Residential) encompassing 3.2 acres. The residence to the west shares an access driveway off of Almond Street that is entirely on the applicant's property. The lot drains roughly from north to south, with an approximate elevation change of 200 feet from the north to the south property lines. The lot is bordered by existing single-family residences to the west and to the southwest on Gooseneck Drive; undeveloped land outside the City boundary to the north; and San Bernardino Flood Control land to the east. BACKGROUND: The Equestrian Trail Master Plan (General Plan Figure CS-3) designates that a Community Trail is proposed to run along the Almond Street frontage of the proposed site. The trail will connect to the existing Community Trail to the west. The applicant has agreed to install the Community Trail improvements along the entire 212 linear feet of frontage of the subject site (per Engineering Department Standard Drawing 1003). The proposed improvements will also include relocating the existing drainage channel head wall and installing the missing Almond Street improvements (curb, gutter, street light and fire hydrant). ANALYSIS: The proposed Community Trail improvements will extend the trail to the property owned by the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to the east. Staff sees no major or minor issues as proposed. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Trails Committee approve the project as presented. Staff Planner: Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner Attachments: Exhibit A - Full set of plans Viezo From Almond Proposed Single Family Residence For The: Shallan Fancily NW. of Amethyst St. & Almond St., Rancho Cucamonga. CA View Of Entry,a,�. View Of Storage ButldinQ l awois'�ee�w� sa mmeme,d • res e<.mw,.o-,E,vm.,miaesrwn Fire Flow Test AxnSd.dul. .q�we MN.^xmp. `10 Nom°. A —Tr Am W�tsyM„wnu Ni�uroflm PAmW6. .xAovmmeiapfL CASE #: DRC2008-01012 r.+rv•m.mg�. rm„nvRF+d�v. r�.n.. ,,,,, SlraltanFmuily cm. av e ,.,201D s i,m�dsi. ._� v..o r♦..,.< 13 oe.. roan au,e,,.Nce nn-aaz 00 Cover Sheet ®1 Hp 0 M H-1 LQ 11h; 1. t:t; '!1.11; Jill! ill 0- k, vr': 611 Hill Jill, itz '11IJ m 04 V--P C? O LLJ to < C - -n., - - " 1— - — % filvI Zml 11.—. l I T11 lvdlk:roz n Ln � _ O o �j to O Nam€ a f U I aI I LLF« a8 U-. 21 1 I I t I'i ' q�SJ ig f a ; _ I I I F t 1 I Ieiyapnlj-pvlu�-i-n+mH-+-im -ico?OVI...un.+u it S1i7mAII-11-vII 71J ifh zolfx&Al of 3 0 es W ��• Yl �f �� p1��9 m9 I .I I I ri i t, s es � k �• loll I I 1 nW," o . k� • J I 7 lit I�. � i �•^ •j}}j1 �/ I I 1 � I I � 1 I I I I —ylY I I I I '^ i I I I II 1 1 - I I I I III I I I I II I � I I W� I I I I I III I I I. I Vf I I III I { tuZ+In;\f -I"�11'^t-nwH-�MIAB-iC6901 F11,+.11ru}7 �i \'li•'W.N I`++`��Ii,�ly�Il IYJ.OSti 0I0✓Oft O O n e •t'r� r by L Y > t f 'I 4 j } S WVZ+1'e1f - Iupuri -nw}I - ngynl5 -iF6!r0l Fnuunvl7 /i1C1 ✓n:a11"'<rrllnrzl'11 ICJ fI'SY'Z Olb�t it mM - � 2 �� I� � � / § | � � / ! ON )0; 1 gill iz. w�>\ `x>x 0 IL w z 0 w Z N () � E; - ! F- Lu z w U- a Q IL " 0t W 01 - LLI w w w (n ui 0- C-) (n ra IIW1 0 WOMB V9. ep Hog ll NOW M, I h FE IL gill g F� I lo'! 11 Pov y g 15M 2 HER 365- oil No MI if N�z�� A/W Rh 010 W1 91 [ital a 11 fill W h • .... ? �e� g�€ :.:. a w.+ t AP d 7 OR .. J _Aga 1€ll � t � � _'` — — � —•---. � _ _ ?��}g `` ti5s fill fit # E J [jig O il, §Q 11 .'i k I g C / k YY i di f-p E?� 5 . \; .,il " �+`';� � # ;: { I• �.5 C = =��aae$e�3¢��€0€� mu � " °W�'eJu� 1 C °'• ZK. g w 1 Lj [lrt�y X Y e Y C C = E, = e r. .$$ k r gpgp / G 9 E $ Js�royn�f-pul�u�-nnn{{-ioglNfS-�Cti'°01"Jmumxt7 Al t'Ic fm:111wnILwrT11 1\d OI�ISZ01f1✓ifi I. I' PLAN VIEW '• � �' I I � . •. , I � - I Section A , 4-, I i \..._....._-------------_---- ,---------------------------\�---�, -------------.----------------- t•--' - - ... - °�P— _ men.. _ _ - _ m., - — J — _ — _ - T'` 'E3a4 _ SIDE VIEW �P P_ \ �� .--`` -�.� -� - _ — _ — _ — �• .� � _ — I� POST DURA RCINfOACEMEYf DEI'4i1, + - •.-.- - - ' .I Section B rNz,[p N"vrc[ rw rrna"rvmapf - rt. rnzxepnz" ° Nr �. W p mfp nn.pR O Section E O Section D E ©Sectiol r . r-,va• - — - ------- �_—�e ,tom fit. �r —_—_—_ _- -- -ww I , ----- - R — pp TP BrxJ ��^• � ' — 60, -..'�•-, © Section G O Section F CASE M DRC200MI012 Section H A - A.rpeMFn,xlr F/mIM1/Af!iMlrc lnr'11r SlmllanFmniG h I._: I Iscu r T��Ircttn acc��cx,mar: HP ENGINEERING, INC ` m,Wl� ... .., . n.0 - ...., t'P iyt; ,,r, rt[ treat fn, t-JO-O Dti 20 t=. � - r', ,,, , ENGINEERING -LAND SURVEYING ,...w,.. ..,,..-��. ::-s Irpwvm n: CIVIL Et 305-a37 v t to � 11_ 1465 CRESTVIP.R ROAD, REDWNDS, CA. 92974 -r . (909) l9B—,!R° _ ' - Site Sections o- — -- ' _N O 4 0 0 N Esas�E's.es dE W F VJ l3ec2Ef$wEas Q U w• i1liJ Elm- ;� 4e d� Mw �, 11 II o LU It IL 't- 18� I f III CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE 1. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Larry Henderson Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) Bill Pallotto MEETING CANCELED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBMITTALS 1, Denise Sink, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on February 3, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TRAILS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY"12, 2011, @ 6:00 PM HAVEN ROOM 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE I. ROLL CALL: Frances Howdyshell Lou Munoz Francisco Oaxaca (Alternate) Janet Ryerson Kelly Matheny (Alternate) Carol Douglass (Equestrian Member) Larry Henderson Tom Tisler (Bicycle Member) Bill Pallotto MEETING CANCELED BECAUSE OF A LACK OF SUBMITTALS 1, Denise Sink, Office Specialist 11 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, hereby certify that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on January 6, 2011, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga.