Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021/07/07 - Regular Meeting Agenda Packet
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA L. Dor ennis Michael REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Mayor Pro Tem July 7, 2021 Lynne B. Kennedy 10500 Civic Center Drive MemberCouncils of the City Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 rttj Ryan A. Hutchison Kristine D. Scott Sam Spagnolo FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD—CITY COUNCIL HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY-SUCCESSOR AGENCY—PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY CLOSED SESSION TRI—COMMUNITIES ROOM 4:30 P.M. REGULAR MEETINGS COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7:00 P.M. The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It Is the Intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at www.cityofrc.us or by contacting the City Clerk's Office at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). CLOSED SESSION — 4:30 P.M. TRI-COMMUNITIES ROOM ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S) C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 1 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION D1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. d/b/a ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. — (CITY) D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 1904713 — (CITY) D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: PEPE'S INC. V. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, CASE NO. 5:20CV02506JGBSP — (CITY) D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASELINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090331030000, 1090331040000, 1089581040000; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND JOSEPH FILIPPI, JOSEPH FILIPPI WINERY AND VINEYARDS; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. — (CITY) D5. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTH WEST CORNER OF HAVEN AVENUE AND CIVIC CENTER DRIVE IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 020833140; AND 020833147; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER AND MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; AND CHRIS HYUN, JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY) E. RECESS — Closed Session to Recess to the Regular City Council Meeting at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 2 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." REGULAR MEETING - 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy Council Members Hutchison, Scott, and Spagnolo A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA B. ANNOUNCEMENT / PRESENTATIONS B1. Presentation of a Proclamation to Liliana Andriani, Outgoing Chamber of Commerce President and Recognition of Angel Jewelers being Awarded as the 2021 Small Business of Distinction in the 40th Assembly District. B2. Presentation of a Certificate of Recognition to Rancho Cucamonga Police Department Deputy Joshua Kelly for Heroically Saving the Life of an Unresponsive 10-day-old Baby. B3. Presentation on Water Safety and Drowning Prevention. C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council from addressing any issue not previously included on the Agenda. The Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council may receive testimony and set the matter for a subsequent meeting. Comments are to be limited to five minutes per individual or less, as deemed necessary by the Mayor, depending upon the number of individuals desiring to speak. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, making loud noises, or engaging in any activity which might be disruptive to the decorum of the meeting. The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 3 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." CONSENT CALENDARS: The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon at one time without discussion. Any item may be removed by a Council Member for discussion. Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority. Council is acting in all capacities with respect to its actions on the Consent Calendars. D. CONSENT CALENDAR - D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for the Special Meetings of June 18, 2021 and June 28, 8 2021 . D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,850,275.32 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to 11 Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of$3,482,652.14 Dated June 07, 2021 Through June 27, 2021.( CITY/FIRE) D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $3,743.55 Dated June 07, 2021 24 Through June 27, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) D4. Consideration to Cancel the Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Successor 26 Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council on October 6, 2021. (CITY/ FIRE) D5. Consideration to Accept the Emergency Management Performance Grant Revenue in the Amount of $26,725, Awarded by the California Office of Emergency Services and 27 Administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services, Fiscal Year 2020. (CITY/FIRE) D6. Consideration of Amendment No. 7 to Contract CO 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa 29 Energy Systems for Citywide HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $487,510 (City) and $65,700 (Fire) for FY 2021/2022. (CITY/FIRE) D7. Consideration of Amendment No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with Able Building Maintenance (CO13-008) for Window Cleaning Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $78,000 31 (City) and $5,000 (Fire) for FY 2021/2022. (CITY/FIRE) D8. Approval to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 0201-043-55 (Mark Allen Hartwig, Owner) Located at 10175 Snowdrop Road, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 88-1; and Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred 33 to as Annexation No. 88-21-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-019) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-020) (FIRE) D9. Consideration of the Purchase of One (1) RT Electric Fire Engine from Rosenbauer Minnesota, 49 LLC in the Amount of$1,296,380. (FIRE) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 4 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." D10.Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the 51 Amount of $44,540; and Authorization to Appropriate $12,130 for the City's Portion of the Amendment. (CITY/FIRE) D11.Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Physical 56 Security Plan for 2021. (RESOLUTION 2021-062). (CITY) D12.Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $489,000 from the Law Enforcement Reserve fund for the Purchase of Fixed Position Automated License Plate Reader Cameras to 95 be Installed at Four Intersections. (CITY) D13.Consideration to Continue the Existing Local Emergency Due to the Novel Coronavirus 158 (COVID-19) Pandemic. (CITY) D14.Consideration of Amendment No. 01 to Managed Services Agreement with Advanced Utility Systems (CO18-087) for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility CIS Infinity Software Billing 160 Platform. (CITY) D15.Consideration of Approval of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to Initiate Proceedings to Levy Annual Assessments; Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; and Declaring the City Council's Intention to Levy Annual Assessments 162 Within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1 , 2, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, and 10; Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2021/22; and Setting the Time and Place for a Public Hearing Thereon. (RESOLUTION NO'S. 2021-053, 2021-054, 2021-055, 2021-056, 2021-057, 2021-058, 2021-059, 2021-060 AND 2021-061) (CITY) E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S) G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT G1. Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Approve SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087 — Orbis Real Estate Partners, This Project Consists of a Request to Develop a New Commercial Building with a Service Station and Convenience Store Within the General Industrial (GI) District at the Southwest Corner of 610 Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on Property Addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0209- 032-35. The Planning Commission's Approval of the Project Qualified as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. If the City Council Denies the Project, the Project is Exempt under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City. (CITY) CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 5 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." G2. Continued Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 982, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Modify Administrative Procedures within 787 the Development Code and Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses and Definitions and Create New Development Standards for Industrial Development within the City. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (DRC2021-00170). (Continued from June 16, 2021 City Council Meeting) (ORDINANCE NO. 982) (CITY) H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) I. COUNCIL BUSINESS 11. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS (Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.) 12. INTERAGENCY UPDATES (Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.) J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS: K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING L. ADJOURNMENT CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 6 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." CERTIFICATION I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted on at least twentyfour (24) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California; 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 91739; and on the City's website. LINDA A.TROYAN, MMC CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's office at (909)477-2700. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired. CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT Page 7 "Our Vision is to build on our success as a world class community, to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive." Water Safety & Drowning Prevention 2021 Quality Improvement Nurse, Patricia Eickholt Administrative Assistant, Nuor Shatila OPOW. r %I I. . . ■ . r r M r . . . - - . . - - ■ a * * F r r M M F F F P � �&Dejs� nside 6yorielhiatencr)Wnters .water.. thi's cah be o w P * * P. v. � '� 4 f s 0 W ! �ath'v�Ta - L or eve ` e - of Ihat,is,sub'm'erged ,. -e\mrrfor-a few seconds cid'td Iar�ngispasm o eezing. 'A victim can present with coughin -pHng,an8'gaggi . p(� of pati(�nt ON Id PE M . . - xnay:also-present with oxyge � &privati whic to dist%ress oP.r ' * " P # jaaure�p w - - P p p p p1W6rM Nib F1WW . IL■ ■ Nor P W ■ r ■ ■ ■ � r F A drowning is when the pati t has respiratory impairment from a submersion or immersion i ' liquid. In this instance, the patient's airway is below the surfa of the liquid. This can lead to resp at kv cardiac failure and death. Non-fatal patient has survived event. Fatal submersion/drowning has led to death of the patient L i0s. -- DROWNING WILL LIKELY DIE AS A CAUSE OF ACCIDENTAL OF CHILD DR0INNINGS RESULT OF DROVIJNING DEATH FGR CHILDREN OCCUR WITH AT LEAST THIS YEAR IN THE U,S. AGES 1 -4 YEA�iS OLD ONE ADULT PRESENT NoMoreUnder.org RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT FIRE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUBMERSION/DROWNING DATA 2020 30 Non-Fatal STATISTIC TOTALS DETAILS Total 28 25 24 Submersion . 15 children Incidents . 11 adults 20 2 Unknown 15 Non-fatal 24 survived, but Submersions could have 10 neurological Issues 5 4 Fatal 4 Submersions • 2 children 0 2020 2 adults Source: Loma Linda Medical Center RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT a RANCHO CUCAMONGA SUBMERSION/DROWNING DATA 2017-PRESENT Non-Fatal Fatal 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Source: Rancho Cucamonga Fire District RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT a ABC 's o _ .. Water Safety Active Adult Supervision Barriers y �_ lasses - Rx (CPR and swim lessons) Community '1 0 rancho_cucamonga_fire_district 0 ••• rancho_cuca monga_fire_district 0 • Child drownings continue to occur not only in our region,but in our own community. It's National Water Safety Month and if you have a pool at home,please practice water safety and stay alert when children are playing in or around water.This also ■ includes small kiddie pools and bath tubs.Remember,children can drown without a sound.Practice the ABCs of water safety: 4A-Active Supervision at all times. ♦B-Barriers should be up around the pool to prevent children from falling �' in. _ a I ` ■ ■ . Adult Supervision n n 49 Liked by ramos_247 and 42 others • Barriers- MAY 12 Add a comment... Community Outreach Ane: 0 rancho_cucamonga_fire-district Q ••• r 0 rancho_cucamonga_fire_district G May is National Water Safety Month � T� and serves as a reminder to practice water safety when children are playing National ADULT without s in or around water.Remember, children can drown without a sound. SUPractice the ABCs of water safety: Water Safety Active Adult Supervision at all times. Month � ���� Barriers should around the pool to prevent children from falling in. *C-Classes can help young swimmers be confident in water.We 1 encourage you to enroll your kids in NO ! swimming classes,if possible. 503 views MAY 26 OAdd a comment... RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT Community 1 rancho cucamonga_fire_district Q ••. Designate a rancho_cucamonga_fire_district* Water Watcher DnDROWNINGPw CEN♦ e of the best waysys to to prevent drownings is by designating a water hen cnildren watcher when around water,including kiddie pools and bath tubs.Children can drown without a sound and as the are swimmin weather warms are given more surround opportunities to surroro und ourselves ■ with water play. Please share this important message and together we IlReadyRC can be#ReadyRC. 5°ca lippremierswimacademy Yes!Thank 0 you for sharing such a crucial message.Please sign your kiddos up for swim lessons! Liked by gabbax3 and 55 others WAY 15,zozo l J Add a comment... 1 • 1 • 1 , a Community 1(31 NO MORE "oXoq UNDER FIRE 0 Designate a Download ' Water Watcher flater Watcher App Child Drownings are 100% Preventable. NOMOREUNDEB.OBG Mai ntain active adult supervision Keep your eyes on the water when children play in water. instead of your phone. Water Watcher App Verizon^ 12:09 PM C 1 0 4. Verizon^ 12:10 PM @ 10 ,-, 60% Search < Back Water Watcher. No More Under do 9 RATINGS AGE cAl EGORY 10 Minutes 9:21 4.6 4 t cab ***** Years Old Health&Fitne GmwO 1F69Y 20 Minutes �Bak 30 Minutes CPR 10 Min About � 20 Min Start =30 dt..-— a If v u Q Today Games Apps Arcade Search Source: NoMoreUnder.org RANCHO Contact Info ONR a 0 Fire District Headquarters (909) 477-2770 RCFire@CityofRC.us 10500 Civic Center Dr City Hall Lower Level Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 United States Monday - Thursday 7.00 a.m. t❑ 6:00 p.m. For more information f visit RCFire.org RANCHO CUCAMONGA . DISTRICT . a June 18, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The City Council and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held a Special Meeting on Friday, June 18, 2021 in Celebration Hall, Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, 12505 Cultural Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meetings to order at 9:09 a.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan A. Hutchison, Kristine D. Scott, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael; Absence Excused: Sam Spagnolo. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Deputy City Manager/Cultural & Civic Services Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development; Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Tamara Layne, Finance Director; and Linda A. Troyan, City Clerk Services Director. Council Member Scott led the Pledge of Allegiance. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None. C. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION C1. Discussion and Consideration of Proposed Budgets for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (Verbal Report) (Document is available for review at City Hall and the City's website at www.cityofrc.us). (FIRE/CITY) John Gillison, City Manager, via a PowerPoint presentation, presented the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budgets and provided a summation of all City Budgets as follows: City General Fund $ 95,160,410 Fire Protection District* $ 66,764,160 Library Services $ 5,604,780 Special Funds (including CIP) $ 100,445,100 *Includes Fire District Capital Fund budget in the amount of$19,119,210. General discussion ensued. The adoption of the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget is scheduled for June 28, 2021 meeting. D. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:15 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director June 18, 2021 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minue 8 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 1 June 28, 2021 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES A. CALL TO ORDER The City Council and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held a Special Meeting on Monday, June 28, 2021 in Council Chambers, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meetings to order at 5:00 p.m. Present were Council Members: Ryan A. Hutchison, Kristine D. Scott, Sam Spagnolo, Mayor Pro Tern Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael. Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development, Lori Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services; Tamara Layne, Finance Director; and Patricia Bravo-Valdez, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services. City Manager Gillison led the Pledge of Allegiance. B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS None. C. CONSENT CALENDAR C1. Consideration to Approve and Adopt Revised Statements of Investment Policy for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE) C2. Consideration to Approve the Following to be in Compliance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 54: 1) Updated Fund Balance Policy; 2) a Resolution Committing to the Level of Fiscal Reserves for the City of Rancho Cucamonga; and 3) a Resolution Committing to the Level of Fiscal Reserves for the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-052) (RESOLUTION NO. FD2021-018) (CITY/FIRE) C3. Consideration to Approve Updated City General Fund Reserve Funding Goals Policy. (CITY) C4. Consideration of Approval of Revisions to Amended Fiscal Year 2020/21 Appropriations. (CITY) C5. Consideration to Approve the Temporary Roadside Memorials on Public Property and Right-of-Way Policy. (CITY) C6. Consideration to Adopt the Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (CITY) MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Spagnolo, to approve Consent Calendar items C1 and C6. Motion carried, 5-0. D. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S) D1. Consideration to Adopt the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget and the Article XIIIB Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2021/22. (RESOLUTION NO. 2021-050, RESOLUTION NO. 2021-051) (CITY) City Manager, John Gillison, reported on item D1. MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tern Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to approve City Manager Staff Report Item D1, adopting Resolution No.'s 2021-050 and 2021-051. Motion carried, 5-0. June 28, 2021 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minue g City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 1 of 1 D2. Consideration to Adopt the General Fund Preliminary Budget, Approve a Resolution Adopting the General Fund Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 2021/22, and set Approval of a Final Budget for the July 21, 2021 Board Meeting. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-015) (FIRE) City Manager, John Gillison, reported on item D2. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Spagnolo, seconded by Board Member Scott, to approve City Manager Staff Report Item D2, adopting Resolution No. FD 2021-015. Motion carried, 5-0. D3. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Budget in the Amount of $2,594,050 and a Resolution Approving an Appropriation Limit in the Amount of$4,456,979 for Fiscal Year 2021/22 in Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-016) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-017) (FIRE) City Manager, John Gillison, reported on item D3. MOTION: Moved by Board Member Scott, seconded by Vice-President Kennedy, to approve City Manager Staff Report Item D3, adopting Resolution No. FD 2021-016 and FD 2021-017. Motion carried, 5-0. D4. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting a Budget in the Amount of $7,000,470 and a Resolution Approving the Appropriations Limit in the Amount of $17,149,398 for Fiscal Year 2021/22 in Communities Facilities District(CFD) No. 85-1. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-013) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-014) (FIRE) City Manager, John Gillison, reported on item D4. MOTION: Moved by Vice-President Kennedy, seconded by Board Member Hutchison, to approve City Manager Staff Report Item D4, adopting Resolution No. FD 2021-013 and FD 2021-014. Motion carried, 5-0. E. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:08 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Linda A. Troyan, MMC City Clerk Services Director June 28, 2021 1 City Council and Fire Protection District Special Meeting Minlu 10 City of Rancho Cucamonga I Page 2 of 1 NONRR � K CITY OF • CUCAMONGA m �l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $1,850,275.32and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers(Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $3,482,652.14 Dated June 07, 2021 Through June 27, 2021.(CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $993,261.92 and $857,013.40 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $3,116,254.13 and $366,398.01 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Weekly Check Register Page 11 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00012594 06/09/2021 ABSOLUTE SECURITY INTERNATIONAL INC 16,055.64 0.00 16,055.64 AP 00012595 06/09/2021 ALL CITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC 34,870.30 0.00 34,870.30 AP 00012596 06/09/2021 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION 847.40 0.00 847.40 AP 00012597 06/09/2021 CALPINE ENERGY SERVICES LP 114,750.00 0.00 114,750.00 AP 00012598 06/09/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 19,616.96 0.00 19,616.96 AP 00012599 06/09/2021 SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA 243,640.45 0.00 243,640.45 AP 00012600 06/09/2021 U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 10,615.92 0.00 10,615.92 AP 00012601 06/10/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 168.60 0.00 168.60 AP 00012602 06/10/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 1,358.00 0.00 1,358.00 AP 00012603 06/10/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 1,377.64 0.00 1,377.64 AP 00012604 06/10/2021 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 199.90 0.00 199.90 AP 00012605 06/10/2021 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 0.00 770.81 770.81 AP 00012606 06/10/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 5,117.00 0.00 5,117.00 AP 00012607 06/10/2021 FASTENAL COMPANY 45.43 0.00 45.43 AP 00012608 06/10/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 0.00 1,422.32 1,422.32 AP 00012609 06/10/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,267.15 0.00 1,267.15 AP 00012610 06/10/2021 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 7.92 7.92 AP 00012611 06/10/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 18.50 18.50 AP 00012612 06/10/2021 MCFADDEN DALE HARDWARE 434.45 0.00 434.45 AP 00012613 06/10/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 366.93 0.00 366.93 AP 00012614 06/10/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 1,813.98 0.00 1,813.98 AP 00012615 06/10/2021 PSA PRINT GROUP 49.57 0.00 49.57 AP 00012616 06/10/2021 SUNRISE FORD 1,101.62 0.00 1,101.62 AP 00012617 06/10/2021 THOMSON REUTERS WEST PUBLISHING CORP 331.00 0.00 331.00 AP 00012618 06/10/2021 VISTA PAINT 32.33 0.00 32.33 AP 00012619 06/16/2021 CALIF GOVERNMENT VEBA/RANCHO CUCAMONGA 102,173.90 0.00 102,173.90 AP 00012620 06/16/2021 CHAFFEY JOINT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 2,973.00 0.00 2,973.00 AP 00012621 06/16/2021 ELECNOR BELCO ELECTRIC INC 194,095.92 0.00 194,095.92 AP 00012622 06/16/2021 GEOGRAPHICS 52.50 0.00 52.50 AP 00012623 06/16/2021 RCCEA 1,552.50 0.00 1,552.50 AP 00012624 06/16/2021 RCPFA 12,719.87 0.00 12,719.87 AP 00012625 06/16/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 380.00 0.00 380.00 AP 00012626 06/17/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 428.47 0.00 428.47 AP 00012627 06/17/2021 ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC 675.00 0.00 675.00 AP 00012628 06/17/2021 BSN SPORTS LLC 1,415.50 0.00 1,415.50 AP 00012629 06/17/2021 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 7.62 0.00 7.62 AP 00012630 06/17/2021 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 1,847.97 0.00 1,847.97 AP 00012631 06/17/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 21,144.55 425.00 21,569.55 *** AP 00012632 06/17/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 1,929.39 3,175.37 5,104.76 *** AP 00012633 06/17/2021 HOSE MAN INC 126.37 0.00 126.37 AP 00012634 06/17/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 352.95 352.95 AP 00012635 06/17/2021 MINUTEMAN PRESS 689.58 739.67 1,429.25 *** AP 00012637 06/17/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 2,157.55 0.00 2,157.55 AP 00012638 06/17/2021 SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC 594.58 0.00 594.58 AP 00012639 06/17/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA NEWS GROUP 15,508.00 0.00 15,508.00 AP 00012640 06/23/2021 AHUMADA,ALEXANDER R 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012641 06/23/2021 ALMAND,LLOYD 0.00 619.50 619.50 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page 12hne: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00012642 06/23/2021 BANTAU,VICTORIA 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012643 06/23/2021 BAZAL,SUSAN 0.00 865.08 865.08 AP 00012644 06/23/2021 BELL,MICHAEL L 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012645 06/23/2021 BERRY,DAVID 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012646 06/23/2021 BROCK,ROBIN 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012647 06/23/2021 CAMPBELL,GERALD 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00012648 06/23/2021 CAMPBELL,STEVEN 0.00 1,241.14 1,241.14 AP 00012649 06/23/2021 CARNES,KENNETH 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012650 06/23/2021 CLABBY,RICHARD 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012651 06/23/2021 CLOUGHESY,DONALD R 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012652 06/23/2021 CORCORAN,ROBERT ANTHONY 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012653 06/23/2021 COSTELLO,DENNIS M 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012654 06/23/2021 COX,KARL 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012655 06/23/2021 CRANE,RALPH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012656 06/23/2021 CROSSLAND,WILBUR 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012657 06/23/2021 CURATALO,JAMES 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012658 06/23/2021 DAGUE,JAMES 0.00 1,246.33 1,246.33 AP 00012659 06/23/2021 DE ANTONIO,SUSAN 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012660 06/23/2021 DEANS,JACKIE 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012661 06/23/2021 DOMINICK,SAMUEL A 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012662 06/23/2021 EAGLESON,MICHAEL 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012663 06/23/2021 EGGERS,BOB 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012664 06/23/2021 FEJERAN,TIM 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012665 06/23/2021 FRITCHEY,JOHN D 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012666 06/23/2021 HEYDE,DONALD 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012667 06/23/2021 INTERLICCHIA,ROSALYN 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012668 06/23/2021 JERKINS,PATRICK 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012669 06/23/2021 KILMER,STEPHEN 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012670 06/23/2021 KIRKPATRICK,WILLIAM M 0.00 841.21 841.21 AP 00012671 06/23/2021 LANE,WILLIAM 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012672 06/23/2021 LARKIN,DAVID W 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012673 06/23/2021 LEE,ALLAN J 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00012674 06/23/2021 LENZE,PAUL E 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012675 06/23/2021 LONCAR,PHILIP 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012676 06/23/2021 LONGO,JOE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012677 06/23/2021 LUTTRULL,DARRELL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012678 06/23/2021 MACKALL,BEVERLY 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012679 06/23/2021 MAYFIELD,RON 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012680 06/23/2021 MCKEE,JOHN 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012681 06/23/2021 MCNEIL,KENNETH 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012682 06/23/2021 MICHAEL,L.DENNIS 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012683 06/23/2021 MORGAN,BYRON 0.00 1,838.72 1,838.72 AP 00012684 06/23/2021 MYSKOW,DENNIS 0.00 1,196.68 1,196.68 AP 00012685 06/23/2021 NAUMAN,MICHAEL 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012686 06/23/2021 NEE,RON 0.00 865.08 865.08 AP 00012687 06/23/2021 NELSON,MARY JANE 0.00 181.48 181.48 AP 00012688 06/23/2021 NOREEN,ERIC 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 2 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Ane: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00012689 06/23/2021 O'BRIEN,TOM 0.00 1,379.46 1,379.46 AP 00012690 06/23/2021 PLOUNG,MICHAEL J 0.00 556.94 556.94 AP 00012691 06/23/2021 POST,MICHAEL R 0.00 1,377.34 1,377.34 AP 00012692 06/23/2021 PROULX,PATRICK 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012693 06/23/2021 REDMOND,MIKE 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012694 06/23/2021 ROBERTS,BRENT 0.00 893.07 893.07 AP 00012695 06/23/2021 ROBERTS,CHERYL L 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00012696 06/23/2021 ROEDER,JEFF 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012697 06/23/2021 SALISBURY,THOMAS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012698 06/23/2021 SMITH,RONALD 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012699 06/23/2021 SORENSEN,SCOTT D 0.00 1,873.16 1,873.16 AP 00012700 06/23/2021 SPAGNOLO,SAM 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012701 06/23/2021 SPAIN,WILLIAM 0.00 851.32 851.32 AP 00012702 06/23/2021 SULLIVAN,JAMES 0.00 505.96 505.96 AP 00012703 06/23/2021 TAYLOR,STEVEN 0.00 2,027.69 2,027.69 AP 00012704 06/23/2021 TULEY,TERRY 0.00 1,929.14 1,929.14 AP 00012705 06/23/2021 VANDERKALLEN,FRANCIS 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012706 06/23/2021 VARNEY,ANTHONY 0.00 1,274.32 1,274.32 AP 00012707 06/23/2021 WALTON,KEVIN 0.00 1,598.58 1,598.58 AP 00012708 06/23/2021 YOWELL,TIMOTHY A 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00012709 06/23/2021 360 DEEP CLEANING LLC 0.00 7,215.00 7,215.00 AP 00012710 06/23/2021 RE ASTORIA 2 LLC 130,618.51 0.00 130,618.51 AP 00012711 06/23/2021 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 56,684.38 1,704.00 58,388.38 *** AP 00012712 06/23/2021 RIVERSIDE,CITY OF 6,909.00 0.00 6,909.00 AP 00012713 06/24/2021 ABC LOCKSMITHS INC 174.00 0.00 174.00 AP 00012714 06/24/2021 AIRGAS USA LLC 0.00 382.79 382.79 AP 00012715 06/24/2021 BIBLIOTHECA LLC 16,471.67 0.00 16,471.67 AP 00012716 06/24/2021 CARQUEST AUTO PARTS 776.91 80.39 857.30 *** AP 00012717 06/24/2021 CITRUS MOTORS ONTARIO INC 521.89 119.06 640.95 *** AP 00012718 06/24/2021 DUMBELL MAN FITNESS EQUIPMENT,THE 465.00 0.00 465.00 AP 00012719 06/24/2021 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATION 987.55 0.00 987.55 AP 00012720 06/24/2021 EMCOR SERVICES 4,708.04 5,820.07 10,528.11 *** AP 00012721 06/24/2021 GENERATOR SERVICES CO INC 1,410.18 0.00 1,410.18 AP 00012722 06/24/2021 HERC RENTALS INC 7,205.21 0.00 7,205.21 AP 00012723 06/24/2021 HOLLIDAY ROCK CO INC 1,019.86 0.00 1,019.86 AP 00012724 06/24/2021 HOSE MAN INC 0.00 176.39 176.39 AP 00012725 06/24/2021 KME FIRE APPARATUS 0.00 1,786.50 1,786.50 AP 00012726 06/24/2021 OFFICE DEPOT 6,069.72 583.80 6,653.52 *** AP 00012727 06/24/2021 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC 1,387.00 0.00 1,387.00 AP 00012728 06/24/2021 THOMPSON PLUMBING SUPPLY INC 314.84 0.00 314.84 AP 00418123 06/09/2021 ALLEN INDUSTRIES INC 244.29 0.00 244.29 AP 00418124 06/09/2021 ANALYZE CORPORATION 1,360.00 0.00 1,360.00 AP 00418125 06/09/2021 ANDRESEN,LUCAS 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00418126 06/09/2021 ASSI SECURITY 165.00 0.00 165.00 AP 00418127 06/09/2021 BCC CONTRACTING INC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00418128 06/09/2021 BERN MARIE'S PROMOTIONAL PRODUCTS 2,300.26 0.00 2,300.26 AP 00418129 06/09/2021 BILLIONS,BRIAN 70.05 0.00 70.05 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 3 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page iiine: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418130 06/09/2021 BLESSED FARM 327.00 0.00 327.00 AP 00418131 06/09/2021 BOOT BARN INC 289.95 0.00 289.95 AP 00418132 06/09/2021 BRAUN BLAISING SMITH WYNNE 1,328.46 0.00 1,328.46 AP 00418133 06/09/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 16,797.50 0.00 16,797.50 AP 00418134 06/09/2021 BUMGARDNER,KASEY 17.00 0.00 17.00 AP 00418135 06/09/2021 BUSTOS,MICHELLE 53.66 0.00 53.66 AP 00418136 06/09/2021 C V W D 0.00 901.52 901.52 AP 00418137 06/09/2021 C V W D 836.80 0.00 836.80 AP 00418142 06/09/2021 C V W D 94,044.47 0.00 94,044.47 AP 00418143 06/09/2021 CASTANEDA,MIGUEL 839.12 0.00 839.12 AP 00418144 06/09/2021 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS 4,695.58 6,437.38 11,132.96 *** AP 00418148 06/09/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,532.74 4,861.68 6,394.42 *** AP 00418149 06/09/2021 COLE,JENNIFER 157.26 0.00 157.26 AP 00418150 06/09/2021 CONCEPT POWDER COATING 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00418151 06/09/2021 COUNTS UNLIMITED 1,800.00 0.00 1,800.00 AP 00418152 06/09/2021 CROWN CASTLE 17,242.00 0.00 17,242.00 AP 00418153 06/09/2021 D&K CONCRETE COMPANY 3,520.21 0.00 3,520.21 AP 00418154 06/09/2021 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 450.43 0.00 450.43 AP 00418155 06/09/2021 DATA TICKET INC 6,014.53 0.00 6,014.53 AP 00418156 06/09/2021 DELL MARKETING LP 14,798.34 0.00 14,798.34 AP 00418157 06/09/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1,143.24 0.00 1,143.24 AP 00418158 06/09/2021 DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY 41,138.63 0.00 41,138.63 AP 00418159 06/09/2021 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 18,997.74 0.00 18,997.74 AP 00418160 06/09/2021 DEPT OF FORESTRY&FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 AP 00418161 06/09/2021 DGO AUTO DETAILING 490.00 0.00 490.00 AP 00418162 06/09/2021 DIETZ,RICHARD J 81.47 0.00 81.47 AP 00418163 06/09/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 590.39 0.00 590.39 AP 00418164 06/09/2021 FIELDMAN ROLAPP&ASSOCIATES 897.00 0.00 897.00 AP 00418165 06/09/2021 FLORES,APRIL 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00418167 06/09/2021 FRONTIER COMM 5,732.76 1,515.18 7,247.94 *** AP 00418168 06/09/2021 FRONTIER COMM 3,446.39 0.00 3,446.39 AP 00418169 06/09/2021 G&M BUSINESS INTERIORS 44.34 1,758.34 1,802.68 *** AP 00418170 06/09/2021 GLOBALSTAR USA 159.32 0.00 159.32 AP 00418171 06/09/2021 GOMEZ,ADRIANA 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00418172 06/09/2021 GRAINGER 1,416.89 1,158.33 2,575.22 *** AP 00418173 06/09/2021 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY INC 271.14 0.00 271.14 AP 00418174 06/09/2021 HAULAWAY STORAGE CONTAINERS INC 119.84 0.00 119.84 AP 00418175 06/09/2021 HEARTSAVERS LLC 132.00 0.00 132.00 AP 00418176 06/09/2021 HERITAGE CUSTOM LANDSCAPES INC 4,020.65 0.00 4,020.65 AP 00418177 06/09/2021 HERITAGE EDUCATION GROUP,THE 1,027.00 0.00 1,027.00 AP 00418178 06/09/2021 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS&ASSOCIATES 16,591.91 0.00 16,591.91 AP 00418179 06/09/2021 HP COMMUNICATIONS INC 6,366.00 0.00 6,366.00 AP 00418180 06/09/2021 HU,HAO LIANG FRANK 61.71 0.00 61.71 AP 00418181 06/09/2021 IDEXX DISTRIBUTION INC 454.86 0.00 454.86 AP 00418182 06/09/2021 INLAND DESERT SECURITY&COMMUNICATIONS INC 58.00 0.00 58.00 AP 00418186 06/09/2021 INLAND EMPIRE PROPERTY SERVICES INC 0.00 59,280.00 59,280.00 AP 00418187 06/09/2021 INLAND TOPSOIL MIXES 646.50 0.00 646.50 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 4 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ifme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418188 06/09/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 117.66 0.00 117.66 AP 00418189 06/09/2021 INTERVET INC 323.25 0.00 323.25 AP 00418190 06/09/2021 ITRON INC 7,398.48 0.00 7,398.48 AP 00418191 06/09/2021 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 2,469.40 0.00 2,469.40 AP 00418192 06/09/2021 KVAC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES INC 1,315.65 0.00 1,315.65 AP 00418193 06/09/2021 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 0.00 601.40 601.40 AP 00418194 06/09/2021 LOTUS CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC 583.05 0.00 583.05 AP 00418195 06/09/2021 LU'S LIGHTHOUSE INC 569.93 0.00 569.93 AP 00418196 06/09/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 1,366.92 0.00 1,366.92 AP 00418197 06/09/2021 MC AVOY&MARK-HAM 1,928.61 0.00 1,928.61 AP 00418198 06/09/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 297.30 0.00 297.30 AP 00418199 06/09/2021 MELGAR,MONICA 11.68 0.00 11.68 AP 00418200 06/09/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 1,002.83 0.00 1,002.83 AP 00418201 06/09/2021 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 108.00 0.00 108.00 AP 00418202 06/09/2021 MMASC 10.00 0.00 10.00 AP 00418203 06/09/2021 MUTUAL PROPANE 0.00 20.00 20.00 AP 00418204 06/09/2021 NBS 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 AP 00418205 06/09/2021 NEGRETE,ALLEN 300.88 0.00 300.88 AP 00418206 06/09/2021 NELISSEN,ARABELLA 14.99 0.00 14.99 AP 00418207 06/09/2021 NICOLE SERRANO LICENSED MARRIAGE 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00418208 06/09/2021 NORMAN,BRETT 0.00 559.40 559.40 AP 00418209 06/09/2021 O S T S INC 3,180.00 0.00 3,180.00 AP 00418210 06/09/2021 ONTARIO SPAY AND NEUTER INC 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00418211 06/09/2021 PACIFIC PARKING SYSTEMS INC 900.00 0.00 900.00 AP 00418212 06/09/2021 PATTON SALES CORP 548.01 0.00 548.01 AP 00418213 06/09/2021 PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC 12,317.63 240.60 12,558.23 *** AP 00418214 06/09/2021 PORAC 168.00 0.00 168.00 AP 00418215 06/09/2021 PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 252.00 0.00 252.00 AP 00418216 06/09/2021 PRO SALES GROUP INC 960.65 0.00 960.65 AP 00418217 06/09/2021 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 16,125.00 0.00 16,125.00 AP 00418218 06/09/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 179.80 0.00 179.80 AP 00418219 06/09/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 4.04 0.00 4.04 AP 00418220 06/09/2021 REFRESHING TOUCH 0.00 1,050.00 1,050.00 AP 00418221 06/09/2021 RIDGELINE TELECOM LLC 1,083.00 0.00 1,083.00 AP 00418222 06/09/2021 SACHDEVA,RAJINDER 74.84 0.00 74.84 AP 00418223 06/09/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 60.00 60.00 AP 00418224 06/09/2021 SAN BERNARDINO CO AUDITOR CONT 7,172.50 0.00 7,172.50 AP 00418225 06/09/2021 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 370.00 0.00 370.00 AP 00418226 06/09/2021 SHEAKLEY PENSION ADMINISTRATION 457.35 178.15 635.50 *** AP 00418227 06/09/2021 SHOETERIA INC 550.98 0.00 550.98 AP 00418228 06/09/2021 SIGN SHOP,THE 798.86 0.00 798.86 AP 00418229 06/09/2021 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 4,649.98 0.00 4,649.98 AP 00418230 06/09/2021 SMITH PIPE AND SUPPLY INC 310.32 0.00 310.32 AP 00418232 06/09/2021 SOCIAL VOCATIONAL SERVICES 2,132.00 0.00 2,132.00 AP 00418233 06/09/2021 SONSRAY MACHINERY LLC 978.75 0.00 978.75 AP 00418234 06/09/2021 SOUTH COAST AQMD 0.00 275.26 275.26 AP 00418239 06/09/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 13,022.18 1,258.50 14,280.68 *** User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 5 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Nme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418240 06/09/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 68,007.30 0.00 68,007.30 AP 00418241 06/09/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 388.76 0.00 388.76 AP 00418242 06/09/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 567.60 1,324.39 1,891.99 *** AP 00418243 06/09/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 2,402.01 0.00 2,402.01 AP 00418244 06/09/2021 SOUTHWEST WAREHOUSE SOLUTIONS 1,011.42 0.00 1,011.42 AP 00418245 06/09/2021 SPROUT SOCIAL INC 8,640.00 0.00 8,640.00 AP 00418246 06/09/2021 T S R CONSTRUCTION&INSPECTION 4,824.50 0.00 4,824.50 AP 00418247 06/09/2021 TECOTZKY,RALPH 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00418248 06/09/2021 TESLA ENERGY OPERATIONS INC 391.22 0.00 391.22 AP 00418249 06/09/2021 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 1,625.00 0.00 1,625.00 AP 00418250 06/09/2021 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 480.00 0.00 480.00 AP 00418251 06/09/2021 TOMCO CNG INC 3,341.20 0.00 3,341.20 AP 00418252 06/09/2021 TORO TOWING 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00418253 06/09/2021 TOWILL INC 7,415.00 0.00 7,415.00 AP 00418254 06/09/2021 TRADER DAN'S INC 478.16 0.00 478.16 AP 00418255 06/09/2021 TRI POINTE HOMES 2.02 0.00 2.02 AP 00418256 06/09/2021 TULSIANI,TARUN 52.61 0.00 52.61 AP 00418257 06/09/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 14,549.95 0.00 14,549.95 AP 00418258 06/09/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,103.96 0.00 1,103.96 AP 00418259 06/09/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 20,924.53 0.00 20,924.53 AP 00418260 06/09/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6746022500 1,103.96 0.00 1,103.96 AP 00418261 06/09/2021 U.S.BANK PARS ACCT#6745033700 6,605.00 0.00 6,605.00 AP 00418262 06/09/2021 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.00 236.93 236.93 AP 00418263 06/09/2021 UNIVERSAL FLEET SUPPLY 0.00 4,391.49 4,391.49 AP 00418264 06/09/2021 UTILIQUEST 1,300.00 0.00 1,300.00 AP 00418265 06/09/2021 VALENZUELA,JOHN 0.00 800.00 800.00 AP 00418266 06/09/2021 VALLEY POWER SYSTEMS INC 0.00 1,147.21 1,147.21 AP 00418267 06/09/2021 VAN SCOYOC ASSOCIATES INC 4,000.00 0.00 4,000.00 AP 00418268 06/09/2021 VCA CALIFORNIA VETERINARY SPECIALISTS 946.20 0.00 946.20 AP 00418269 06/09/2021 VCA CENTRAL ANIMAL HOSPITAL 346.20 0.00 346.20 AP 00418270 06/09/2021 VELOCITY TRUCK CENTERS 282.17 0.00 282.17 AP 00418271 06/09/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 5,529.86 0.00 5,529.86 AP 00418272 06/09/2021 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER LLC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00418273 06/09/2021 WALKER,ROBERT 0.00 295.00 295.00 AP 00418274 06/09/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 9.53 0.00 9.53 AP 00418275 06/09/2021 WANG,PING 57.05 0.00 57.05 AP 00418276 06/09/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 6,462.18 1,321.73 7,783.91 *** AP 00418277 06/09/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 35,673.00 0.00 35,673.00 AP 00418278 06/09/2021 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 20,288.00 0.00 20,288.00 AP 00418279 06/09/2021 WILLIAMS,TANYA 3.85 0.00 3.85 AP 00418280 06/09/2021 WILSON&BELL AUTO SERVICE 453.23 0.00 453.23 AP 00418281 06/09/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 524.50 524.50 AP 00418282 06/09/2021 ZHU,QING 68.45 0.00 68.45 AP 00418283 06/09/2021 ZIYOU,HUANG 58.99 0.00 58.99 AP 00418284 06/09/2021 ZUNIGA,CRYSTAL 501.03 0.00 501.03 AP 00418285 06/16/2021 3 LINES COLLECTIVE,THE 425.00 0.00 425.00 AP 00418286 06/16/2021 3SI SECURITY SYSTEMS INC 760.00 0.00 760.00 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 6 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page flme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418287 06/16/2021 49ER COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.00 4,815.49 4,815.49 AP 00418288 06/16/2021 ADAPT CONSULTING INC 559.16 0.00 559.16 AP 00418289 06/16/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 24.58 0.00 24.58 AP 00418290 06/16/2021 ALLIANCE FOR INNOVATION 7,650.00 0.00 7,650.00 AP 00418291 06/16/2021 AMTECH ELEVATOR SERVICES 51.00 0.00 51.00 AP 00418292 06/16/2021 AQUABIO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC 1,450.00 0.00 1,450.00 AP 00418293 06/16/2021 ARROW TRAILER SUPPLIES INC 49.51 0.00 49.51 AP 00418294 06/16/2021 BARRERA,MELISSA 136.00 0.00 136.00 AP 00418295 06/16/2021 BOB'S MUFFLER SHOP 300.00 0.00 300.00 AP 00418296 06/16/2021 CAGLE'S APPLIANCE CENTER 0.00 258.60 258.60 AP 00418297 06/16/2021 CALIFORNIA STATE CONTROLLER 532.02 0.00 532.02 AP 00418298 06/16/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 314.11 0.00 314.11 AP 00418299 06/16/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 127.52 0.00 127.52 AP 00418300 06/16/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 32.26 0.00 32.26 AP 00418301 06/16/2021 CALIFORNIA,STATE OF 342.73 0.00 342.73 AP 00418302 06/16/2021 CAMERON WELDING 112.68 0.00 112.68 AP 00418303 06/16/2021 CAMERON-DANIEL PC 1,952.00 0.00 1,952.00 AP 00418304 06/16/2021 CASTANEDA,JULIAN 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00418305 06/16/2021 CCS ORANGE COUNTY JANITORIAL INC 5,109.16 0.00 5,109.16 AP 00418306 06/16/2021 CERTIFIED TOWING INC 350.00 0.00 350.00 AP 00418307 06/16/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 5,881.00 1,784.60 7,665.60 *** AP 00418308 06/16/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 1,833.39 360.42 2,193.81 *** AP 00418309 06/16/2021 CONSUMERS PIPE&SUPPLY CO 0.00 6.84 6.84 AP 00418310 06/16/2021 COOKE,BLAKE 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00418311 06/16/2021 CROSSTOWN ELECTRICAL&DATA INC 156,463.10 0.00 156,463.10 AP 00418312 06/16/2021 DAISYECO INC 422.53 0.00 422.53 AP 00418313 06/16/2021 DANIELS TIRE SERVICE 1,524.37 0.00 1,524.37 AP 00418314 06/16/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 625.00 0.00 625.00 AP 00418315 06/16/2021 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 32.00 0.00 32.00 AP 00418316 06/16/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 23.75 0.00 23.75 AP 00418317 06/16/2021 DIRECTV 179.99 0.00 179.99 AP 00418318 06/16/2021 DIRECTV 184.23 0.00 184.23 AP 00418319 06/16/2021 DIRECTV 74.99 0.00 74.99 AP 00418320 06/16/2021 EXECUTIVE AUTO DETAIL 0.00 360.00 360.00 AP 00418321 06/16/2021 EXPERIAN 52.00 0.00 52.00 AP 00418322 06/16/2021 EXPRESS BRAKE SUPPLY INC 671.58 0.00 671.58 AP 00418323 06/16/2021 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION 0.00 825.02 825.02 AP 00418324 06/16/2021 FIELDMAN ROLAPP&ASSOCIATES 655.50 0.00 655.50 AP 00418325 06/16/2021 FLEMING,CARESSA 0.69 0.00 0.69 AP 00418326 06/16/2021 FOOTHILL VACUUM&JANITORIAL 0.00 376.84 376.84 AP 00418327 06/16/2021 FORTIN LAW GROUP 312.01 0.00 312.01 AP 00418328 06/16/2021 FUEL SERV 0.00 275.00 275.00 AP 00418329 06/16/2021 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY 1,470.23 0.00 1,470.23 AP 00418330 06/16/2021 GRAINGER 46.67 616.94 663.61 *** AP 00418331 06/16/2021 HAMMOCK,AMANDA 176.04 0.00 176.04 AP 00418332 06/16/2021 HEARTSAFE AMERICA INC 0.00 1,431.00 1,431.00 AP 00418333 06/16/2021 HILO COLLISION CENTER 1,634.80 0.00 1,634.80 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 7 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page flne: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418334 06/16/2021 HLP INC 189.70 0.00 189.70 AP 00418335 06/16/2021 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 379.01 0.00 379.01 AP 00418336 06/16/2021 ICMA 1,400.00 0.00 1,400.00 AP 00418337 06/16/2021 INLAND OVERHEAD DOOR COMPANY 1,474.00 2,304.00 3,778.00 *** AP 00418338 06/16/2021 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 302.51 0.00 302.51 AP 00418339 06/16/2021 INTERSTATE ALL BATTERY CENTER 661.78 0.00 661.78 AP 00418340 06/16/2021 INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP INC 0.00 1,394.78 1,394.78 AP 00418341 06/16/2021 KIMLEY HORN&ASSOCIATES INC 14,355.00 0.00 14,355.00 AP 00418342 06/16/2021 LAVEY,LISA 16.50 0.00 16.50 AP 00418343 06/16/2021 LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE 2,966.00 0.00 2,966.00 AP 00418344 06/16/2021 LIFE-ASSIST INC 0.00 10,375.56 10,375.56 AP 00418345 06/16/2021 LISTON,ISAIAH P 0.00 324.00 324.00 AP 00418346 06/16/2021 LIVE OAK DOG OBEDIENCE 1,395.00 0.00 1,395.00 AP 00418348 06/16/2021 LOWES COMPANIES INC 3,958.69 1,335.90 5,294.59 *** AP 00418349 06/16/2021 MAGELLAN ADVISORS LLC 11,197.50 0.00 11,197.50 AP 00418350 06/16/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 1,120.06 0.00 1,120.06 AP 00418351 06/16/2021 MARIN,GERARDO 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00418352 06/16/2021 MARLINK INC 0.00 162.00 162.00 AP 00418353 06/16/2021 MARY MCGRATH ARCHITECTS 0.00 13,166.40 13,166.40 AP 00418354 06/16/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 301.61 287.18 588.79 *** AP 00418355 06/16/2021 MENDOZA,REESE 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00418356 06/16/2021 MI,NAN 86.38 0.00 86.38 AP 00418357 06/16/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 4,684.41 0.00 4,684.41 AP 00418358 06/16/2021 MIJAC ALARM COMPANY 0.00 43.00 43.00 AP 00418359 06/16/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 81.87 0.00 81.87 AP 00418360 06/16/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 21.54 23.04 44.58 *** AP 00418361 06/16/2021 NELSON,KYLE 0.00 200.00 200.00 AP 00418362 06/16/2021 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS 3,355.77 0.00 3,355.77 AP 00418363 06/16/2021 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTRS OF CA 714.50 0.00 714.50 AP 00418364 06/16/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 168.90 1,055.98 1,224.88 *** AP 00418365 06/16/2021 ONWARD ENGINEERING 39,985.00 495.00 40,480.00 *** AP 00418366 06/16/2021 PALMER CONSULTING 1,953.50 0.00 1,953.50 AP 00418367 06/16/2021 PARKES,DR KEVIN 0.00 16,000.00 16,000.00 AP 00418368 06/16/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 2,480.76 17,228.61 19,709.37 *** AP 00418369 06/16/2021 POSTAL PERFECT 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00418370 06/16/2021 PRE-PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC 60.17 0.00 60.17 AP 00418371 06/16/2021 PRIME GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC 17,510.00 0.00 17,510.00 AP 00418372 06/16/2021 PROHEALTH PARTNERS A MEDICAL GROUP INC 0.00 450.00 450.00 AP 00418373 06/16/2021 PROS CONSULTING INC 5,085.00 0.00 5,085.00 AP 00418374 06/16/2021 QUIQ INCORPORATED 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 AP 00418375 06/16/2021 RAINBOW BOLT&SUPPLY INC 2,588.96 0.00 2,588.96 AP 00418376 06/16/2021 RANCHO CUCAMONGA EXPLORER 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 AP 00418377 06/16/2021 RANCHO SMOG CENTER 179.80 0.00 179.80 AP 00418378 06/16/2021 RBM LOCK AND KEY SERVICE 37.71 0.00 37.71 AP 00418379 06/16/2021 SAFE-ENTRY TECHNICAL INC 0.00 515.00 515.00 AP 00418380 06/16/2021 SBPEA 2,485.44 0.00 2,485.44 AP 00418381 06/16/2021 SBPEA 23.73 0.00 23.73 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 8 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418382 06/16/2021 SHERIFFS COURT SERVICES 100.00 0.00 100.00 AP 00418383 06/16/2021 SHRED PROS 126.00 0.00 126.00 AP 00418384 06/16/2021 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC 13,652.00 0.00 13,652.00 AP 00418385 06/16/2021 SIGN SHOP,THE 137.92 0.00 137.92 AP 00418386 06/16/2021 SILVER&WRIGHT LLP 22.40 0.00 22.40 AP 00418387 06/16/2021 SMARTSHEET INC 13,500.00 0.00 13,500.00 AP 00418388 06/16/2021 SOCAL OFFICE TECHNOLOGIES 8,112.72 301.68 8,414.40 *** AP 00418392 06/16/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 10,042.49 1,612.95 11,655.44 *** AP 00418393 06/16/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 30.80 0.00 30.80 AP 00418394 06/16/2021 STABILIZER SOLUTIONS INC 1,566.80 0.00 1,566.80 AP 00418395 06/16/2021 STANLEY PEST CONTROL 200.00 210.00 410.00 *** AP 00418396 06/16/2021 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 46.70 0.00 46.70 AP 00418397 06/16/2021 STOVER SEED COMPANY 6,356.03 0.00 6,356.03 AP 00418398 06/16/2021 TIREHUB LLC 438.37 0.00 438.37 AP 00418399 06/16/2021 TRANSWEST TRUCK CENTER 371.73 0.00 371.73 AP 00418400 06/16/2021 TRIDEN GROUP CORP 7,650.00 0.00 7,650.00 AP 00418401 06/16/2021 U S LEGAL SUPPORT INC 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00418402 06/16/2021 ULINE 140.86 0.00 140.86 AP 00418403 06/16/2021 UNITED WAY 45.00 0.00 45.00 AP 00418404 06/16/2021 UNITY COURIER SERVICE INC 1,143.00 0.00 1,143.00 AP 00418405 06/16/2021 UPS 183.54 0.00 183.54 AP 00418406 06/16/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 8,335.73 0.00 8,335.73 AP 00418407 06/16/2021 VISION SERVICE PLAN CA 10,356.53 0.00 10,356.53 AP 00418408 06/16/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 224.02 0.00 224.02 AP 00418409 06/16/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,628.09 0.00 1,628.09 AP 00418410 06/16/2021 WILLDAN GROUP 7,830.00 0.00 7,830.00 AP 00418411 06/16/2021 WILLDAN GROUP 17,275.00 0.00 17,275.00 AP 00418412 06/16/2021 WINZER CORPORATION 0.00 341.19 341.19 AP 00418413 06/16/2021 WORLD BOOK INC 2,152.85 0.00 2,152.85 AP 00418414 06/16/2021 ZHAO,XINYI 714.99 0.00 714.99 AP 00418415 06/23/2021 RODRIGUEZ,VICTOR 0.00 619.50 619.50 AP 00418416 06/23/2021 TOWNSEND,JAMES 0.00 2,550.78 2,550.78 AP 00418417 06/23/2021 WALKER,KENNETH 0.00 238.25 238.25 AP 00418418 06/23/2021 911 VEHICLE 0.00 4,557.50 4,557.50 AP 00418419 06/23/2021 ADVANCED CHEMICAL TRANSPORT INC 1,282.00 0.00 1,282.00 AP 00418420 06/23/2021 ADVANTAGE SEALING SYSTEMS INC 526.73 0.00 526.73 AP 00418421 06/23/2021 AFLAC GROUP INSURANCE 4,311.14 0.00 4,311.14 AP 00418422 06/23/2021 ASSI SECURITY 235.00 0.00 235.00 AP 00418423 06/23/2021 BILL&WAGS INC 0.00 442.97 442.97 AP 00418424 06/23/2021 BORDEN II,JOHN 41.75 0.00 41.75 AP 00418425 06/23/2021 BRIDGEALL LIBRARIES LIMITED 16,000.00 0.00 16,000.00 AP 00418426 06/23/2021 BRIGHTVIEW LANDSCAPE SERVICES INC 64,122.03 0.00 64,122.03 AP 00418427 06/23/2021 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH AMERICA INC 9,315.41 2,328.85 11,644.26 *** AP 00418428 06/23/2021 C V W D 0.00 324.55 324.55 AP 00418429 06/23/2021 C V W D 0.00 36.80 36.80 AP 00418434 06/23/2021 C V W D 62,627.79 1,816.26 64,444.05 *** AP 00418435 06/23/2021 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 9 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wine: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418436 06/23/2021 CAL PERS LONG-TERM CARE PROGRAM 164.48 0.00 164.48 AP 00418437 06/23/2021 CALIF DEPT OF TAX&FEE ADMINISTRATION 19.57 221.82 241.39 *** AP 00418438 06/23/2021 CALIFORNIA UTILITIES EMERGENCY ASSOC 500.00 0.00 500.00 AP 00418439 06/23/2021 CELLEBRITE INC 4,300.00 0.00 4,300.00 AP 00418440 06/23/2021 CHAMPION FIRE SYSTEMS INC 8,807.00 0.00 8,807.00 AP 00418441 06/23/2021 CHINO MOWER&ENGINE SERVICE 2,501.02 0.00 2,501.02 AP 00418442 06/23/2021 CINTAS CORPORATION #150 0.00 360.42 360.42 AP 00418443 06/23/2021 CORODATA MEDIA STORAGE INC 65.16 0.00 65.16 AP 00418444 06/23/2021 COUNTRY ESTATE FENCE CO INC 1,563.72 0.00 1,563.72 AP 00418445 06/23/2021 D&K CONCRETE COMPANY 2,348.96 0.00 2,348.96 AP 00418446 06/23/2021 DAISYECO INC 540.50 0.00 540.50 AP 00418447 06/23/2021 DELL MARKETING LP 1,913.87 4,903.39 6,817.26 *** AP 00418448 06/23/2021 DEPENDABLE COMPANY INC 15.25 0.00 15.25 AP 00418449 06/23/2021 DEPT OF FORESTRY&FIRE PROTECTION 0.00 300.00 300.00 AP 00418450 06/23/2021 DEVIN C.HUGHES ENTERPRISES LLC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00418451 06/23/2021 DIG SAFE BOARD 109.00 0.00 109.00 AP 00418452 06/23/2021 EMARA,ELSAYED 6,806.08 0.00 6,806.08 AP 00418453 06/23/2021 EPSTEIN,SHAWN 0.00 87.01 87.01 AP 00418454 06/23/2021 EQUILIBRIUM COUNSELING SERVICES 375.00 0.00 375.00 AP 00418455 06/23/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 65.62 0.00 65.62 AP 00418456 06/23/2021 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 60.80 0.00 60.80 AP 00418457 06/23/2021 FRONTIER COMM 1,159.84 901.91 2,061.75 *** AP 00418458 06/23/2021 FRONTIER COMM 3,446.15 0.00 3,446.15 AP 00418459 06/23/2021 GOLDEN STATE RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY 94,153.00 1,232.00 95,385.00 *** AP 00418460 06/23/2021 GONZALES,LISA 135.74 0.00 135.74 AP 00418461 06/23/2021 GRAINGER 2,665.47 1,359.75 4,025.22 *** AP 00418462 06/23/2021 HE,YU 80.98 0.00 80.98 AP 00418463 06/23/2021 HI-LINE ELECTRIC COMPANY 136.77 0.00 136.77 AP 00418464 06/23/2021 IMPERIAL SPRINKLER SUPPLY INC 6,448.84 0.00 6,448.84 AP 00418465 06/23/2021 INLAND PRESORT&MAILING SERVICES 306.10 0.00 306.10 AP 00418466 06/23/2021 INLAND SOCAL MEDIA GROUP LLC 1,595.00 0.00 1,595.00 AP 00418467 06/23/2021 INYO NETWORKS 11,119.50 0.00 11,119.50 AP 00418468 06/23/2021 J AND S STRIPING CO INC 42,108.53 0.00 42,108.53 AP 00418469 06/23/2021 JACKSON,STEPHANIE 66.00 0.00 66.00 AP 00418470 06/23/2021 JONSSON,ARINBJORN 53.34 0.00 53.34 AP 00418471 06/23/2021 LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS LLC 5,482.10 0.00 5,482.10 AP 00418472 06/23/2021 LOWE,WILLIAM 69.37 0.00 69.37 AP 00418473 06/23/2021 LOZANO SMITH LLP 6,359.93 0.00 6,359.93 AP 00418474 06/23/2021 MAIN STREET SIGNS 527.60 0.00 527.60 AP 00418475 06/23/2021 MARIPOSA LANDSCAPES INC 117,910.18 2,428.71 120,338.89 *** AP 00418476 06/23/2021 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLY COMPANY 315.25 0.00 315.25 AP 00418477 06/23/2021 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES INC 341.87 0.00 341.87 AP 00418478 06/23/2021 MERCURY DISPOSAL SYSTEMS INC 1,281.66 0.00 1,281.66 AP 00418479 06/23/2021 MG PETROLEUM INC 848.00 0.00 848.00 AP 00418480 06/23/2021 MIDWEST TAPE 1,219.40 0.00 1,219.40 AP 00418481 06/23/2021 MODAL SHOP INC,THE 3,546.24 0.00 3,546.24 AP 00418482 06/23/2021 MONTGOMERY HARDWARE CO 422.81 0.00 422.81 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 10 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ilme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418483 06/23/2021 MOUNTAIN VIEW SMALL ENG REPAIR 769.29 0.00 769.29 AP 00418484 06/23/2021 NAPA AUTO PARTS 230.80 355.24 586.04 *** AP 00418485 06/23/2021 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL 1,330.54 0.00 1,330.54 AP 00418486 06/23/2021 NEIUBER,ROBERT 175.00 0.00 175.00 AP 00418487 06/23/2021 NEW COLOR SILK SCREEN&GRAPHICS 84.09 0.00 84.09 AP 00418488 06/23/2021 NINYO&MOORE 0.00 2,371.00 2,371.00 AP 00418489 06/23/2021 NV5INC 11,007.89 0.00 11,007.89 AP 00418490 06/23/2021 ONTARIO WINNELSON CO 602.27 0.00 602.27 AP 00418491 06/23/2021 PACIFIC UTILITY INSTALLATION INC 375,157.00 0.00 375,157.00 AP 00418492 06/23/2021 PAPPAS,KIMBERLY 246.05 0.00 246.05 AP 00418493 06/23/2021 PARS 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 AP 00418494 06/23/2021 PATTON SALES CORP 21.55 0.00 21.55 AP 00418495 06/23/2021 PINNACLE PETROLEUM INC 53,729.78 0.00 53,729.78 AP 00418496 06/23/2021 PYRO SPECTACULARS INC 16,125.00 0.00 16,125.00 AP 00418497 06/23/2021 RDO EQUIPMENT COMPANY 223.73 0.00 223.73 AP 00418498 06/23/2021 SHRED PROS 118.00 0.00 118.00 AP 00418499 06/23/2021 SIGN SHOP,THE 0.00 1,469.71 1,469.71 AP 00418500 06/23/2021 SMIDERLE,LISA 56.98 0.00 56.98 AP 00418501 06/23/2021 SMITH,SANS 40.79 0.00 40.79 AP 00418504 06/23/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 4,422.91 0.00 4,422.91 AP 00418505 06/23/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 64.17 0.00 64.17 AP 00418506 06/23/2021 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 1,350.24 0.00 1,350.24 AP 00418507 06/23/2021 SPECIALTY FILM&PACKAGING INC 2,342.49 0.00 2,342.49 AP 00418508 06/23/2021 STOTZ EQUIPMENT 233.87 0.00 233.87 AP 00418509 06/23/2021 STOVER SEED COMPANY 3,555.75 0.00 3,555.75 AP 00418510 06/23/2021 SUN BADGE CO 0.00 313.69 313.69 AP 00418511 06/23/2021 THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIONAL 0.00 975.00 975.00 AP 00418512 06/23/2021 TIANA SANCHEZ INTERNATIONAL LLC 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 AP 00418513 06/23/2021 TINT CITY WINDOW TINTING 50.00 0.00 50.00 AP 00418514 06/23/2021 TURNKEY CORP HOUSING LLC 75.58 0.00 75.58 AP 00418515 06/23/2021 UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT OF SO CAL 66.22 0.00 66.22 AP 00418516 06/23/2021 UPS 33.00 0.00 33.00 AP 00418517 06/23/2021 UTILIQUEST 420.00 0.00 420.00 AP 00418518 06/23/2021 VERITEXT 346.25 0.00 346.25 AP 00418519 06/23/2021 VERIZON 23.62 0.00 23.62 AP 00418520 06/23/2021 VERIZON WIRELESS-LA 389.07 0.00 389.07 AP 00418521 06/23/2021 VIRGIN PULSE INC 2,179.60 0.00 2,179.60 AP 00418522 06/23/2021 VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY 4,735.84 0.00 4,735.84 AP 00418523 06/23/2021 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC CO 497.43 495.67 993.10 *** AP 00418524 06/23/2021 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY 1,880.26 0.00 1,880.26 AP 00418525 06/23/2021 WESTLAND GROUP INC 1,046.50 0.00 1,046.50 AP 00418526 06/23/2021 WESTLAND GROUP INC 9,258.00 0.00 9,258.00 AP 00418527 06/23/2021 WILSON,AARON 1,732.87 0.00 1,732.87 AP 00418528 06/23/2021 XEROX FINANCIAL SERVICES 298.38 0.00 298.38 AP 00418529 06/23/2021 YING,JIANMEI 53.13 0.00 53.13 AP 00418530 06/23/2021 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 45,210.00 0.00 45,210.00 AP 00418531 06/23/2021 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 22,189.25 22,189.25 User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 11 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page Wme: 07:33:52 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Excluding So Calif Gas Company. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418532 06/23/2021 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 22,189.25 22,189.25 AP 00418533 06/23/2021 YORK RISK SERVICES GROUP INC 0.00 22,189.25 22,189.25 Total City: $3,116,254.13 Total Fire: $366,398.01 Grand Total: , Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 12 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page fine: 07:33:52 NONRR � K CITY OF • CUCAMONGA m �l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $3,743.55 Dated June 07, 2021 Through June 27, 2021. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $3,478.57 and $264.98 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. BACKGROUND: N/A ANALYSIS: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register Page 24 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA AND RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT So Calif Gas Company Only. Agenda Check Register 6/7/2021 through 6/27/2021 Check No. Check Date Vendor Name Ca Fire Amount AP 00418231 06/09/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 33.46 78.07 111.53 *** AP 00418502 06/23/2021 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 3,445.11 186.91 3,632.02 *** Total City: $3,478.57 Total Fire: $264.98 Grand Total: S3,7TS.55 Note: *** Check Number includes both City and Fire District expenditures User: VLOPEZ-Veronica Lopez Page: 1 Current Date: 06/28/2021 Report:CK_AGENDA REG_PORTRAIT_CONSOLIDATED-CK:Agenda Check Register Portrait Layout Page ifme: 08:01:23 .. ,.iw HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �010 DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: Consideration to Cancel the Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council on October 6, 2021. (CITY/ FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council cancel the Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority and City Council on October 6, 2021. BACKGROUND: The City Council sits as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Financing Authority. Regular Meetings of the City Council are held on the first and third Wednesday of the month. ANALYSIS: The International City/County Manager's Association's (ICMA) exists to serve professionals who work continuously to advance excellence in local governance and improve quality of life. This year's ICMA Annual Conference will be held October 3-6, 2021, in Portland, Oregon. Since this important conference conflicts with the October 6, 2021 City Council meeting, it is recommended the City Council cancel the October 6, 2021 meetings. The City Clerk's Office will provide the appropriate legal notification of the change. FISCAL IMPACT: Not Applicable. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item supports the City's Vision to build on our success as a world-class community, create an equitable, sustainable and vibrant City rich in opportunity for all to thrive. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 26 Nonion CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m Olt, DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Augie Barreda, Deputy Fire Chief Joseph Ramos, Emergency Management Coordinator SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept the Emergency Management Performance Grant Revenue in the Amount of $26,725, Awarded by the California Office of Emergency Services and Administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services, Fiscal Year 2020. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council / Fire Board accept grant revenue in the amount of$26,725 awarded by the California's Governor's Office of Emergency Services and administered by the San Bernardino County Fire Department, Office of Emergency Services under Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Emergency Management Performance Grant (EMPG). The grant funding will be used for personnel costs within the Emergency Management Division. BACKGROUND: The EMPG FY 2020 funding is a non-competitive grant designated for each of the twenty-four cities and towns within the County as members of the Operation Area (OA). Each jurisdiction is allocated a $10,000 base, with the remainder of the grant distributed on a per capita basis to each eligible jurisdiction. Funds must be used to support local emergency management program activities that contribute to the State's Goals and Objectives, and the County's OA's capability to prevent, prepare for, mitigate against, respond to, and recover from emergencies and disasters, whether natural or man-made. Although the allocation may vary each year, the City receives this funding annually. ANALYSIS: The City of Rancho Cucamonga will continue to use these funds to assist with the implementation and execution of the Fire District's overall Emergency Management programs. This includes the coordination and development of the Auxiliary Communication Services (ACS) for ham radio operators and Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) programs. Also included are staff training programs such as the Accountability Officer, Emergency Operations Center, and WebEOC training. These programs fall in line with the goals and objectives of the State and County to increase the disaster resiliency in the City through education and awareness of natural and man-made disasters in our community. Page 27 FISCAL IMPACT: Grant revenue will be received into account number 1383000-4740 (Emergency Management Performance Grant Income). Up to $26,725 of grant revenue will be utilized to offset personnel costs within the Fire District's Emergency Management Division in account number 3281503- 5000 (Regular Salaries). COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item brings together portions of the Council's vision and core value by providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by ensuring our Emergency Management Division has the resources and tools necessary to provide City and Fire District staff, as well as community members, with the skill set needed to manage a disaster of any size. ATTACHMENTS: N/A Page 2 Page 28 .. ,.iw HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �010 DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Neil Plummer, Facilities Superintendent SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 7 to Contract CO 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems for Citywide HVAC Maintenance and Repair Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $487,510 (City)and $65,700 (Fire) for FY 2021/2022. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve Amendment No. 7 to contract CO 16-114 with EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems extending the term of the contract to June 30, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $487,510, for routine maintenance and extra work in City facilities and $65,700 for routine maintenance and extra work in Fire District facilities, and authorize the City Manager to renew the contract annually. BACKGROUND: On April 20, 2016, the City Council accepted the bids received for citywide HVAC maintenance and repairs and awarded contract CO 16-114 to EMCOR Services/Mesa Energy Systems. The term of the contract is one year, with the option to renew in one-year increments for a maximum of six years through June 30, 2022. If approved, Amendment 7 to contract CO 16-114 will extend the term of the contract to June 30, 2022 with NO rate increase and one change to the scope of work, the addition of the Public Safety Facility, with no other changes to the terms and conditions. ANALYSIS: EMCOR/Mesa has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga during 2021/2022 with NO increase to current rates. EMCOR/Mesa Energy Systems provides great service for the City and is very knowledgeable of all the City's HVAC equipment. To that end, staff recommends the City Council approve the renewal of contract CO 16-114 effective July 1, 2021 and approve the spending limit of$487,510 for City facilities and $65,700 for Fire District facilities for FY 2021/2022.A copy of the amendment is available in the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract price is within the contract services budget line items in the adopted budget for FY 2021/2022. Page 29 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of"promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all" by ensuring City and Fire District facilities are properly maintained. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 30 .. ,.iw HONOR a CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA m �010 DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Boards of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: William Wittkopf, Public Works Services Director Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Neil Plummer, Facilities Superintendent SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 9 to the Professional Services Agreement with Able Building Maintenance (CO13-008) for Window Cleaning Services in an Amount Not to Exceed $78,000 (City)and $5,000 (Fire) for FY 2021/2022. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve Amendment No. 9 to contract CO 13-008 with Able Building Maintenance, extending the term of the contract on a month-to-month basis to June 30, 2022, in an amount not to exceed $78,000 (City) and $5,000 (Fire)for FY 2021/2022. BACKGROUND: On February 6, 2013, pursuant to RFP #12/13-103, the City Council accepted the bids received for window cleaning services and awarded contract CO 13-008 to Able Building Maintenance. Amendment No. 6 dated July 1, 2018 added the Fire District as a party to the agreement. If approved, Amendment No. 9 to contract CO 13-008 will extend the term on a month-to-month basis up to an additional year through June 30, 2022 with NO rate increase and no changes to the scope of work, service levels, or other terms and conditions. ANALYSIS: Able Building Maintenance has submitted a Letter of Intent expressing their desire to continue providing service to the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District during FY 2021/2022 with NO rate increase. Able Building Maintenance continues to provide service meeting the needs of the City and District as outlined in the contract documents. Staff recommends the City Council and Board of Directors approve Amendment No. 9 to contract CO 13-008 effective July 1, 2021, thereby extending the term of the contract on a month-to-month basis up to an additional year through June 30, 2022 in an amount not to exceed $78,000 (City) and $5,000 (Fire) for FY 2021/2022. A copy of this agreement is available in the City Clerk's Office. Page 31 FISCAL IMPACT: This contract price is within the approved contract services budget line item in 1001312 (Facilities Maintenance), 1700312 (Sports Complex) and 3281529 (Fire Facilities Maintenance) for FY 2021/2022. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of"promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all" by ensuring City and Fire District facilities are properly maintained. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 32 DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Robert Ball, Fire Marshal Noah Daniels, Finance Manager Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager SUBJECT: Approval to Adopt an Annexation Map Showing Assessor Parcel Number 0201-043-55 (Mark Allen Hartwig, Owner) Located at 10175 Snowdrop Road, Which is Proposed to be Annexed Into CFD No. 88-1; and Approval to Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory Referred to as Annexation No. 88-21-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Specifying Services Proposed to be Financed, to Set and Specify the Special Taxes Proposed to be Levied Within the Annexation Territory and Set a Time and Place for a Public Hearing Related to the Annexation. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-019) (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-020) (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire Board: 1. Adopt a Resolution adopting Annexation Map No. 88-21-1 showing property (located at 10175 Snowdrop Road) proposed to be annexed in Community Facilities District No. 88- 1; and 2. Adopt a Resolution of Intention to Annex Territory referred to as Annexation No. 88-21-1 into Community Facilities District No. 88-1 to specify the services to be financed, to set and specify the rate and method of apportionment of the special taxes proposed to be levied within the territory proposed to be annexed and to set a time and place for a public hearing regarding the annexation. BACKGROUND: Mark Allen Hartwig, owner of certain property (APN 0201-043-55) located within the Fire Protection District (the "Territory"), is conditioned by the City and Fire Protection District to annex such property into the existing Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 88-1 to satisfy fire protection service mitigation impacts. ANALYSIS: In order to initiate formal annexation proceedings, the Fire Board is being asked to adopt a resolution approving an annexation map of the territory proposed to be annexed and a Resolution of Intention to Annex. Page 33 Resolution No. FD 2021-019 will adopt an annexation map (annexation No. 88-21-1) showing property proposed to be annexed into CFD No. 88-1 (Attachment 1). The annexation map (Attachment 2) illustrates the territory proposed to be annexed. The territory is inclusive of the entire development project proposed by the owner. Resolution No. FD 2021-020 declares the Fire Boards intention to authorize the annexation of territory (annexation no. 88-21-1) to CFD No. 88-1. The Resolution of Intention generally sets forth: (a) the District's intention to annex the Territory to the District; (b) the facilities and services which will, in part, be financed (Attachment 4, Exhibit A) through the levy of the special tax on the Territory if annexed; (c) the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax (Attachment 4, Exhibit B); (d) the date, time and location of the public hearing set for August 18, 2021; and (e) election requirements. Special Counsel for the District has worked with staff to establish the annexation process, timelines and draft resolutions. The resolutions are considered to be routine and non- controversial, as the property owners are in support of the annexation procedure. On August 18, 2021, there will be a public hearing for public input/concerns on this matter. FISCAL IMPACT: The special tax revenues that are collected of the CFD No. 88-1 are used to pay for public facilities and services in the District area. Costs related to the administering of the District are the responsibility of the property owners within the District. Annexation of the property located at 10175 Snowdrop Road will ensure the property owner covers the cost of increased demand for fire services resulting from new development within the Territory. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item brings together portions of the Council's vision and core value by providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. Annexation of the property into CFD 88-1 ensures the delivery of vital fire and life safety services to all residents while satisfying fire protection service mitigation impacts. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - CFD 88-1 Map Attachment 2 -Annexation Map Attachment 3 - Resolution No. FD 2021-019, Annexation Map No. 88-21-1 Attachment 4 - Resolution No. FD 2021-020, Intention to Annex Page 2 Page 34 RANCHO Community Facilities District No. 88-1 CUCAMDNGA annexation 88 21-1 k Annexation No. 88-21-1 FIRE DEPARTMENT ;1: — � APN: 0201-043-55 ■ � i�.t.1�1.1.1.Ir1.�.rwr.�.r.1.1�1.1.I.1.1.r.l.l>•1: �I�1.1.r.1.1.1.1.1�1�1�1.r�l.r�rr Ln 7 ■ ra Hillside Rd ■ v 1 �, M ■ }; ■ i Wilson Av ` 0 S ¢ S S ; ; a LU Omit ■ Banyan St q& i ■ i a 19th St t I � � v Base Line Rd Base Line Rd Foothill Bl Foothill BI ■ i ■ Arrow Rt Arrow Rt� i � 8th St■i I.I.Irl.l.l.lf ; > a � '2 i > 6th S G v * i w 4th Jti1.1.1.........................1 Tth 5t 4 � the m¢.dara,and Seog'ap"[rf—b—{7rf--Um'y—lade by are tt=u�4 C L M re 07 af PmbnD Critarrxga era pr—ttd n a PLmc RSLIJOG af general rd-rat— [R M Ihe(]y da-:M L'uar�orge robe—rrprc m—ranry.rearxi-tatar.arguar Im in �C e+�' ar m tlx—Lt.e4 eu xr 6—piet—a brrnfl e:of—ry L-Pamr H — E M F: M Legend a'P ded to}v rrnn. the:ever stuitl rrY LpOr1 the lr!s*n�orl tar arty�axvr Q] L S 'LY3.1 a,d is dnrdetl rn ngepentlertrr icily —V are all irl—eban an— raeh. S L lu ■1.1, the City d Randn CL-w—p em=p aid wthat Illretabm di=ims arre and a, < Z L Y^ repreaa,-ranam and war.-art—. ln.Ld,r%bJt ram once:.me:naled,ter-arte: City L��rIiL71.,., 4 mertrartnIny and Frt—far a parnclar purp— TrE CW or kanCe Cure—ga Mall ra—rm—ammt na a arty IaGtLy re.yw6esel cf Lire cmaa'nn for Cu arty Miles Qnasi-es¢i re¢r ade In zM rAan'ntian prnWee a�i�{n}arty adm orFD6-1 ramps asrnrg dJ bP arx aeon'larU LrS rm]nfmrAm—Table n—, 1.5 0.75 0 1.5 ATTAaG'�HMENT 1 SHEET 'I OF 1 ANNEXATION MAP 88-29-1 OF OOMMUNiTY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SNOW DROP RO J ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER - a101-043-55 a 1 CITY LIMITS ' TT'1 � rn Igo- -875 1 4 CMV 'J� d S0� TLC fk. 1in2h 375*eL MITE!THIS ANNEXATION MAP SHALL 4MVERN FOR ALL DEMI-21 AS TO THE EXTEND OF THE �IONATIR9E. TERFITGRYA#YIEXEDTO THE AEIWE REFERENCED COMMU"'rTT4GILIT1ES415TP1GT .W54NT16JIJAT el"ENGINEER lkAH;.LKZJCUGAMONnA FIRE PT?0.7�C-ZLn�DISTgbC7 LERFFFPCAT1eN FILED IN THE DFFiCE or FKE SECRETARr OF THE RANCHO CUC MON{3A FIRE PROTECTION MTRiET.:AUFCRNIA.THIS RdY 24P'I LEGAL DESCRIPTION: JAMCG C.RSVboi.".ACRCTARV ASSUSCA Wki-,EL NUM19EIR HAMMOCLIGANGNIGA FIRE PRIYFEL91ON GiSTFJCTSTATE OF PALiFVRMIA Dial-W3-45 I HEREBY GEFrnrY'TMATTHE WfTHIN MOP SHOMMO BDUNOARIES❑'F PARn-EL MAPIH a5PARCEL a BOOK 2DbFW3E63 h'R1111ORI PROPOSE0T0 EIE A19KEN bD TO COMMUNITY FAMITIES HIVit 7N -b-1 OF TYIg I#AN[HO CUCAMDNC:AFRE PROTECTION DISTRICT,COUNTY'OF 9:Afi BFATIARDIN0.8lAlI`E 4F G4LIFO MIIA,TAl%6 APPROVE,BY THE EIGAM OF OIRE-rT4ORS OF SUCH PIRIF MOYSC MN SAN 9pRmkl0NQ Cp¢NTY RECORDER S OERWICEq IHSTlnCtftiTnRPUIJLARMFIYM�THdhEbF,HELD-ON TRE DAY OF 2E21. BY ITS RESOLDTION Na_ .TIME THIS MAP'PIAS VMN FILED WA&ER GQCU"idt HYMDiR ANNIMATIOH MAP AMENDS THE EIOUNC*Nly MAID FQIA CC)NMUNITY THIS.. _DAY OF 2D21,AT__M.W BDOM FACILITiCS p'ISibCt W.Oi-+OR THE RAHC;HO CLICAYONDA FIRE [IF MAPE,OF A6$99SM9NT AND-CQMMUIITY FACUTIES DISTRJD-rR AT PROTECT1611 D19TRICT,ODUHTY OF 9AN GERNARDISM,STATE OF PAGE AT THE REQUEST OF IM THE AM01W CAUT-ORNIA.PRIOR REC4RDEDONJANIM.RV i,ingAtWOK SIB Os OP # MAP#OrASSHSSgEMtANOCOMWUNffYFACILLLFES 1XI3TRICT9,AT FACLE ,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY REGORDER FOR THE CC1UfTYOF 5AN BERNARD'W,CALIFORNIA. qQ¢NrrQN ASSE69DR•RECOROEILGLCwx GDUNTY�F SAP MR-MI31W JAk"C.RPVNQLPS,WERETARY 8T. RANCHO CLICAYOIIC,A FIRE PROTEGTTDN MSTF CT STATE OF CAIM:01RMIA DEPUTY RSWkP9Q ATTA DENT 2 RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, ADOPTING AN ANNEXATION MAP (ANNEXATION NO. 88-21-1) SHOWING PROPERTY PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (the "Board of Directors"), desires to initiate proceedings to annex territory to an existing Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California , and specifically Article 3.5 thereof. The existing Community Facilities District has been designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, there has been submitted a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-21-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State Of California" (the "Annexation Map") showing the territory proposed to be annexed to the District (the "Territory"). NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: Section 1: The above recitals are all true and correct. Section 2: The Annexation Map showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District and to be subject to the levy of a special tax is hereby approved and adopted. Section 3: A certificate shall be endorsed on the original and on at least one (1) copy of the Annexation Map, evidencing the date and adoption of this Resolution, and within fifteen (15) days after the adoption of the Resolution fixing the time and place of the hearing on the intention to annex or extent of the annexation to the District, a copy of such map shall be filed with the correct and proper endorsements thereon with the County Recorder, all in the manner and form provided for in Section 3111 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX - Page 1 of 1 ATTAPkIMENT 3 RESOLUTION NO. FD 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO AUTHORIZE THE ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY (ANNEXATION NO. 88-21-1) TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 WHEREAS, the Board Of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, California, ("Board of Directors"), formed a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act'). The Community Facilities District has been designated as Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "District'); and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to initiate proceedings to consider the annexation of certain real property to the District (the "Territory"); and WHEREAS, a map entitled "Annexation Map No. 88-21-1 to Community Facilities District No. 88-1 Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, County of San Bernardino, State of California"(the"Annexation Map") showing the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District has been submitted, the map has been previously approved and a copy of the map shall be kept on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors now desires to proceed to adopt the Resolution of Intention to annex the Territory to the District, to describe the territory included within the District and the Territory proposed to be annexed thereto, to specify the facilities and services to be financed from the proceeds of the levy of special taxes within the Territory, to set and specify the special taxes that would be levied within the Territory to finance such facilities and services, and to set a time and place for a public hearing relating to the annexation of the Territory to the District. NOW,THEREFORE,the Board of Directors of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District does hereby resolve as follows: 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. 2. Legal Authority. These proceedings for annexation are initiated by this Board of Directors pursuant to the authorization of the Act. 3. Intention to Annex; Description of the Territory and the District. The Board of Directors hereby determines that the public convenience and necessity requires that the Territory be added to the District and this Board of Directors declares its intention to annex the Territory to the District. A description of the Territory is as follows: All that property within the Territory proposed to be annexed to the District, as such property is shown on the Annexation Map as previously approved by the Board of Directors, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the Secretary and shall remain open for public inspection. A general description of the Territory included in the District is hereinafter described as follows: All that property and territory as originally included within the District and as subsequently annexed to the District, as such properties were shown on original maps of the District and the territories subsequently annexed to the District, all as approved by this Board of Directors and designated by the name of the District, reference is made to the attached and incorporated Exhibit"A"(the"Annexation Map"). Copies of such maps Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 1 of 11 ATT*CM M E NT 4 are on file in the Office of the Secretary and have also been filed in the Office of the County Recorder. 4. Services and Facilities Authorized to be Financed by the District. The services that are authorized to be financed by the District from the proceeds of special taxes levied within the existing District are generally described in Exhibit"B" (the"Services and Facilities")attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and all costs associated the District, administration of the District, the determination of the amount of special taxes to be levied, the costs of collection any special taxes, and costs otherwise incurred in order to carry out the authorized purposes of the District. If and to the extent feasible the Services and Facilities shall be provided in common within the existing District and the Territory. 5. Special Taxes. It is the further intention of this Board of Directors body that, except where funds are otherwise available, a special tax sufficient to pay for the Services and Facilities and related incidental expenses authorized by the Act,secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the Territory, will be levied annually within the boundaries of such Territory. For further particulars as to the rate and method of apportionment of the proposed special tax, reference is made to Exhibit"C" (the "Special Tax Formula"), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and which sets forth in sufficient detail the method of apportionment of such special tax to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Territory to clearly estimate the maximum amount that such person will have to pay. The special tax proposed to be levied within the Territory shall be equal to the special tax levied to pay for the Services and Facilities in the existing District, except that a higher or lower special tax may be levied within the Territory to the extent that the actual cost of providing the Services and Facilities in the Territory is higher or lower than the cost of providing those Services and Facilities in the existing District. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the special tax may not be levied at a rate which is higher than the maximum special tax authorized to be levied pursuant to the special tax formula. The special taxes herein authorized shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency, as applicable for ad valorem taxes; however, as applicable,this legislative body may, by resolution, establish and adopt an alternate or supplemental procedure as necessary. Any special taxes that may not be collected on the County tax roll shall be collected through a direct billing procedure by the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, acting for and on behalf of the District. Upon recordation of a Notice of Special Tax Lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all non-exempt real property in the Territory and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the legislative body ceases. The maximum special tax rate authorized to be levied within the District shall not be increased as a result of the annexation of the Territory to the District. 6. Public Hearing. NOTICE IS GIVEN THAT ON THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021, AT THE HOUR OF 7:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, BEING THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, 10500 CIVIC CENTER DRIVE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA 91730, A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD WHERE THIS BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL CONSIDER THE AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT, THE PROPOSED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX TO BE LEVIED WITHIN THE TERRITORY AND ALL OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH IN THIS RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. THAT AT THE ABOVE-MENTIONED TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ANY PERSONS INTERESTED, INCLUDING TAXPAYERS AND PROPERTY OWNERS, MAYAPPEARAND BE HEARD, AND THAT THE TESTIMONY OF ALL INTERESTED PERSONS FOR OR AGAINST THE Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 2 of 11 Page 39 ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY OR THE LEVYING OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN THE TERRITORY WILL BE HEARD AND CONSIDERED. ANY PROTESTS MAY BE MADE ORRALLY OR IN WRITING. HOWEVER, ANY PROTESTS PERTAINING TO THE REGULARITY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THE PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE IN WRITING AND SHALL CLEARLY SET FORTH THE IRREGULARITIES OR DEFECTS TO WHICH OBJECTION IS MADE. ALL WRITTEN PROTESTS SHALL BE FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK PRIOR TO THE TIME FIXED FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING. WRITTEN PROTESTS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME BEFORE THE CONCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC HEARING. 7. Majority Protest. If a written majority protest against the proposed annexation of the Territory to the District is filed, and such protests are not withdrawn so as to reduce the protests to less than a majority, no further proceedings shall be undertaken for a period of one year from the date of the decision by the Board of Directors on the issues discussed at the public hearing. 8. Election. If, following the public hearing described in the Section above, the Board of Directors determines to proceed with the annexation of the Territory to the District, a proposition shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the Territory. The vote shall be by registered voters within the Territory; however, if there are less than 12 registered voters, the vote shall be by landowners, with each landowner having one vote per acre or portion thereof within the Territory. 9. Notice. Notice of the time and place of the public hearing shall be given by the City Clerk by causing the publication of a Notice of Public Hearing in a legally designated newspaper of general circulation, said publication pursuant to Section 6061 of the Government Code, with said publication to be completed at least seven (7) days prior to the date set for the public hearing. A copy of this Resolution shall be transmitted to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as required by the Act. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 3 of 11 Page 40 EXHIBIT "A" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 ANNEXATION MAP SHEET 1 OF 1 ANNEXATION MAP 88-21-1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 88-1 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA SNOW DROP RD ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER 42U1-043-SS O W J } Y _ CITYLIMITS CO LU rn No, 67514 7k A CNk 0 G�►1 � T NK{1=3 75 i:N NOTE:TWq ANNEXATION MAP RHALL60UERWf-0R ALL DEML9 AS TO THE EXTEND OF TICE B10H14TIrt1E: 1ERA}TT]ILY AfitiE%Ea T4 THE ABU YE REFEREN GEC GOWNIUNTYTiAGILITIESUISTRIGT JWSON NdAAY t ITV.NCINEER RANCHOtUGAMONGA FIRE P&4.T�GTIOFi ISTpnCTtERRFOCIkTM7N FILED IN THE QFF1r,9 QF T1rt,$F�VREfARYUF THE RANCHO CUDAM0NOA FI RE PROTECTTaN DISTIsI:T.CALIFDnNiA.THIS_DAY J4YT LEGAL DESCFtIPT➢ON: JAIaCEC.REYN¢LDS,SECRr TARw At5MOR PAR1;EIL NUMBER RANCHO CUCAWON13A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT STATE[IF CAIJF4RWIA 4201-IM345 I HERESYCERItFYTHATTNE NYTHIN M41-EROMMO BOUNDARIES OF PARCEL AMAP 1 SM!,PARCEL A BOOM 2D3 PAGE BS TFAMTORT PPLOFUMED TO BE A 19WEA bD V GOMMIJWT4 FACILITrES DI$TRIGT'NQ.W1 OF T1I1 RANCHO CUCRMONQA FEE PROTEDTIO W OIBTRI CT,COUNTY QF ILAN BERNARDINO-STATE OF GALIFOBMIA,nU APPIGOIEO BY THE BOAHO OF DIRE47T4RS bP SUCH FIII[P"TICWN SAN marN DINO CDIrNTYi1EC0RDER#CEW1Wi C^Vt CISTAICY A REGULAR Mfftn,'YmKNEOF,HELD ON THE DAY O'F MI.8Y ITS RESOLUTION NO- -T+ME THIS IMP HAS DUN P1LGD UHOER DQCUWI.NT RUMAR AN IAAPAMENDO ME BOCINDPAY61AP FOP COW4UNITY THI4,,,,_E OE Pd21,AT__W.W68OW FACILMI'48 pl$fa"t W .00.1 QF TH!RkAK40 CLMAWOWOA FIRE OF aOF AFiSESAWNTAMC)COW MI?•II TY FAVRJrIE S DIsmins AT PROTECT'Ifm DISTRICT,COUNTY OF 9AN BERILI.RDW,STATE OF PAGE W THEIIGOMST OF Rf THEAMOUNT CALIFORNIA.PRIOR RECORDED ON J ;.114 AT WOK 01 OF OF # - mAFS Or ASSISSMCI+T AND CQMWUNrTY FAC ILLTIEB Dd9TIIICT9,AT PACE J]-1 S.IN THE DFRCE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER FOR THE COUNTY OF 5AN BERNAREnW.CALIFORNIA. BOB GWT'QN A95E69DR•REGORDERZ-MRS. GDUNTY OF SAN RERNJIRDIWO JAW10Et.RIYNaLDSj We TARY BY. RANG"CUCAWQN1Q.4 FIRE PROTECTION DISTFHCT STATE OF CA11FOFAIA DEPUTY RECORPER Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 4 of 11 Page 41 RANCHO Community Facilities District No. 88-1 LM Q CUCAM Annexation No. 88-21-1 Annexation$s Zl 1 APN: 0201-043-55 FIRE DEPARTMENT MENT c ■ j Ra.u1.u1.,.Y�,.,s,�.,emu...r..l.....+�l�,r,r �,.,�,.,�..Luu.�....,a,�l-r�l■ s 3 Cn ' ¢ ¢ �m m Hillside Rd c u ■ , j Wilson Av O COED < _ .n w i........ O Banyan St ■ C .-. Z 0 "t Z op TI 19th St�� a ¢' co 0 k Z r 00 t 0 N Base Line Rd D m Base Line Rd � Cn X j j 9 Foothill BI Foothill BI � j n 01 Arrow Rt E j Arrow Rt Z ■ O O j j � ■ j 8th St■..I...,M,Mimi f OD co} 'R ■ Q ,p 6th S i w j w 7 4t11 5t�..uuuuu,�,.,�,.,�,.............1 .l�l.r.l.u.� 4th St d Q 4 Q Q 4 d the .ded,aid gmjepfa.[[arm ['1rabmiRl.n'7 xzfenle by eb tlwT C [p C C L ip uq�.V d ko C--V.—peeved as a pb..mmare d 9.1 1— R @ 6 v Th. �'daarvdn[um—W—kesrea.ra.--.Y• -^or9ua�s� E ,L +-' .<�. esa �Pla� 7— E M Legend all II ry„� id G dieGOd[o I.kp..f*-111'.rry aN 1dmrP.lon PnSCRe6 Meer = L Q/ � VV ■• 1, CI IJ I111{.�., L7 (p Ae Cay d Pena.0—p.0"ad wane U--d—ea;eon A d S Q �}y CD -d,.arr—, —.rp,tac a.a—U�MAM 1.aarm Q' ii..� `1' d nr d—bda F.e.d M1trxa par a perevir_p TI. oN d Pend.C q. � —11 .ate a« .�..n d d, (l,eR, Miles CFD 88-1 N vrar•,r.nmAfie a earrvedc In ary.ime-rbn P--d-4tr!ai-V edam« m e Pam.�J— .e,dnar,.�,—W.ena 1.5 0-75 0 'I.5 EXHIBIT "B" COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES AND FACILITIES The Services. It is the intention of the Board of Directors to finance certain types of fire services (the"Services")that are in addition to those currently provided in or required for the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing services already available to the Territory. A general description of the Services to be financed is as follows: The performance of functions, operations, maintenance, and repair activities in order to provide fire protection and suppression services to the Territory. The Facilities. It is the intention of this Board of Directors to finance the purchase, construction, expansion, improvement, or rehabilitation of certain types of fire facilities(the"Facilities")that are in addition to those currently provided to serve the Territory and are necessary to meet the increased demand for such fire services resulting from new development within the Territory and will not be replacing facilities already available to serve the Territory. A general description of the types of the Facilities to be financed is as follows: Fire protection and suppression facilities and equipment, rescue equipment,with a useful life of five(5)years or more, including collection and accumulation of funds to pay for anticipated facilities cost shortfalls and reserves for repair and replacement to the extent that such facilities are necessary to meet the increased demand for such facilities resulting from new development within the Territory. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 6 of 11 Page 43 EXHIBIT "C" FOOTHILL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-1 RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The rate and method of apportionment of the special tax authorized to be levied within Community Facilities District No. 88-1 (the "CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method") as originally established for and as applied to the taxable properties within such community facilities district is as follows: "The Resolution of Intention refers to this Exhibit for an explanation of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax so as to allow each landowner or resident within the proposed Community Facilities District to estimate the maximum annual amount that would be required for payment for such landowner's or resident's property. PROPERTY CATEGORIES There are three categories of property subject to special taxation, which are identified as follows: 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY All property identified as a single Tax Assessor's parcel for which property a building permit has been issued as of May 31 of any year. 2. APPROVED PROPERTY All property which of as May 31 of any year is subject to an approved Development Agreement with either the City of Rancho Cucamonga or the County of San Bernardino, an approved Annexation Agreement with the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or a recorded Final Subdivision Map or Final Parcel Map, but for which no building permit has been issued. 3. VACANT PROPERTY All other property, excluding property which, as of the date of the election to authorize the levy of the Special Tax, is: (i)owned by public entity; (ii) owned by a regulated public utility and being utilized for transmission or distribution purposes; or (iii) zoned as open space. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 7 of 11 Page 44 TAXING CLASSIFICATIONS AND MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES The taxing classifications for the above Property Categories and the maximum authorized Special Tax rates for fiscal year 1988-1989 are as follows: TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (More than 3,590 square feet of $292 per year dwelling unit living area) B. Residential Class II (3,077 — 3,589 square feet of $225 per year dwelling unit living area) C. Residential Class III (2,564 — 3,076 square feet of $180 per year dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class IV (2,308 — 2,563 square feet of $157 per year dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V (2,051 — 2,307 square feet of $135 per year dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (1,795 — 2,050 square feet of $124 per year dwelling unit living area) * G. Residential Class VI (less — 1,795 square feet of $112 per year dwelling unit living area) * $449 per acre per year or$0.04 H. Commercial or Industrial Property per SF or building area, whichever is greater** 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre *** Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 8 of 11 Page 45 * The square footage of dwelling unit living area shall mean the square footage of internal living space, exclusive of garages and other structures not used as living space, as shown on the building permit(s) issued for the dwelling unit. ** The square footage of a commercial or industrial building area shall mean the gross square footage for the building as reflected in the building plans upon which any building permits for the building were issued. *** The acreage of a Vacant Property shall be the gross acreage exclusive of any acreage dedicated or offered for dedication to a public agency. ESCALATION OF MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES The maximum annual Special Tax rates applicable to all Developed Property shall be subject to escalation each July 1 commencing July 1, 1989, by the change factor calculated annually by the State of California Department of Finance for the purpose of increasing appropriations limits of State and local governments. In the event that the Department of Finance or its successor ceases to calculate the annual change factor,such Special Tax rates shall be subject to annual escalation not to exceed the increase in the Consumer Price Index as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area for the preceding twelve (12) month reporting period. The maximum Special Tax rates applicable to all Approved Property and Vacant Property shall not be subject to escalation. METHOD OF APPROTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX The Special Tax shall be levied annually on all taxable property within one of the above identified Property Categories so long as Special Tax revenues are necessary to pay authorized expenses of the Community Facilities District,which may include,without limitation, payment of debt service on any bonded indebtedness of the Community Facilities District; replenishment of any required reserve fund for any such future public improvements, services or debt service; direct payment for public improvements; or payment of the operational and maintenance expenses of providing fire suppression and protection services to properties within the Community Facilities District. The annual levy of the Special Taxes shall be apportioned as follows: STEP 1: Fifty percent (50%) of the estimated ad valorem property tax revenue to be collected from properties within the Community Facilities District in the subject fiscal year which are allocable to the Foothill Fire Protection District shall be allocated to pay the estimated expenses of the Community Facilities District for the subject fiscal year. The remainder of the estimated expenses shall be referred to as the Net CFD Expenses. STEP 2: That equal percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Developed Property Taxing Classifications necessary to generate Special Tax revenues equal to the Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on all Developed Property. STEP 3: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that percentage of the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Approved Property necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on Approved Property. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 9 of 11 Page 46 STEP 4: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, that percentage of all the maximum authorized Special Tax rate applicable to all Vacant Property necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses shall be levied on all Vacant Property. STEP 5: If additional Special Tax revenues are still necessary to generate the Net CFD Expenses, the Community Facilities District shall: A. Compare (i) the Special Tax rate which would be levied on each Developed Property pursuant to STEP 2 above with (ii)the product resulting from multiplying the square footage of the Developed Property times the Base Maximum Special Tax. The Base Maximum Special Tax means an amount equal to$0.0025 per square foot subject to escalation at the same rate and at the same time applicable to the maximum Special Tax rates for Developer Property. B. If the product described in (ii)above exceeds the Special Tax rate described in (i)above for any Developed Property, the Community Facilities District shall increase the Special Tax rate levied on each such Developed Property in equal percentages up to the rate not to exceed the product described in (ii)above necessary to generate the additional Special Tax revenues to equal Net CFD Expenses. Notwithstanding the foregoing,the minimum Special Tax which shall be levied on all taxable properties within the Community Facilities District each Fiscal Year shall be: DEVELOPED PROPERTY: $1.00 per dwelling unit for residential uses $1.00 per acre for commercial/industrial uses APPROVED PROPERTY: $1.00 per lot or parcel VACANT PROPERTY: $1.00 per acre The ad valorem property tax contribution identified in Step 1 shall be reduced in any Fiscal Year by the amount by which the sum of such contribution and the minimum Special Taxes would exceed the estimated expenses of the Community Facilities District for such Fiscal Year The"Report"of the Special Tax Consultant,to be approved as a part of the record upon the conclusion of the public hearing pertaining to the formation of the Community Facilities District, shall set forth supplementary details pertaining to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax and shall provide controlling guidance in the interpretation and implementation of this Rate and Method of Apportionment." Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 10 of 11 Page 47 Application of the CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method to Annexation No. 88-21-1 The maximum special tax authorized to be levied for Fiscal Year 2020/2021 within that area annexed to Community Facilities District No. 88-1, known and designated as Annexation No. 88-21-1 is as follows: MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2020/2021 TAXING CLASSIFICATION MAXIMUM TAX RATE 1. DEVELOPED PROPERTY A. Residential Class I (More than 3,590 square feet of $1,481 per year dwelling unit living area) B. Residential Class 11 (3,077 — 3,589 square feet of $1,135.63 per year dwelling unit living area) C. Residential Class III (2,564 — 3,076 square feet of $906.26 per year dwelling unit living area) D. Residential Class IV (2,308 — 2,563 square feet of $794.33 per year dwelling unit living area) E. Residential Class V (2,051 — 2,307 square feet of $679.75 per year dwelling unit living area) F. Residential Class VI (1,795 — 2,050 square feet of $627.84 per year dwelling unit living area) G. Residential Class VI (less — 1,795 square feet of $566.96 per year dwelling unit living area) $2,279.45 per acre per year or H. Commercial or Industrial Property $0.18426 per square foot or building, whichever is greater 2. APPROVED PROPERTY $200 per lot or parcel 3. VACANT PROPERTY $10 per acre The maximum special tax rates set forth above are subject to escalation pursuant to the CFD No. 88-1 Rate and Method commencing July 1, 1989. Resolution No. FD 2021-XXX Page 11 of 11 Page 48 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT sww-f DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of the Purchase of One (1) RT Electric Fire Engine from Rosenbauer Minnesota, LLC in the Amount of$1,296,380. (FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Fire Board authorize the purchase of one (1) RT Electric Fire Engine from Rosenbauer Minnesota, LLC in the amount of$1,296,380. BACKGROUND: In support of the City's environmental sustainability efforts, the District is seeking new ways to reduce its carbon emissions. As the City updates its General Plan, the topics of mobility, ecology and urbanization are important when it comes to environmental protection and traffic. The District has purchased electric vehicles over the last few years, and now with advancements in technology will explore the next generation electric fire engine. The District is embracing the future by becoming one of the first agencies in California to purchase an electric fire engine, to be located at new Fire Station 178. The intent is to reduce the District's carbon footprint and noise emissions. The District has identified a progressive manufacturer who has redesigned the fire engine platform from the ground up, incorporating electric technology. This new platform employs an innovative electric drive system while also decreasing the overall footprint of the vehicle allowing better maneuverability. This vehicle offers both ergonomic and tactical advantages—for less physical strain on the emergency crews and for greater operational success. The engine can change on the fly from a low center of gravity street-based fire engine to an off-road height fire engine with 4-wheel drive capability, thus allowing for response capabilities due to our diverse topography. In addition, the engine meets all National Fire Protection Association requirements for fire suppression apparatus, including the four-hour pump time, by using a range extending generator. ANALYSIS: Staff recommends purchasing the electric fire engine from Rosenbauer Minnesota, LLC. At this time, Rosenbauer is the only manufacturer of electric fire engines in the world. As a result, this will be a sole source purchase. Rosenbauer is the world's largest manufacturer of fire equipment with eleven manufacturing locations worldwide and more than 150 years of manufacturing experience. The District has purchased fire apparatus from Rosenbauer previously, including a tractor drawn aerial truck and type 1 fire engine. Page 49 FISCAL IMPACT: The purchase of one electric fire engine was approved in the FY 2021-22 budget. A total of$1.3 million was allocated in the Fire Protection Capital Fund under account 3288501-5604 (Capital Outlay—Vehicle). COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item brings together portions of the Council's vision and core values by providing a sustainable City and promoting a safe and healthy community for all. This is accomplished by ensuring our first responders have the resources and tools necessary to respond to emergency incidents while also reducing carbon emissions and improving environmental sustainability. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 50 NONRR I � K CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council President and Members of the Board of Directors FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Mike McCliman, Deputy Fire Chief Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services for the Fire Station 178 Project in the Amount of $44,540; and Authorization to Appropriate $12,130 for the City's Portion of the Amendment. (CITY/FIRE) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council / Fire Board: 1. Approve amendment No. 002 to the Professional Services Agreement, FD 19-021, with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services fo the Fire Station 178 Project in the amount of$44,540; and 2. Authorize the appropriation of$12,130 for the City's portion of the amendment. BACKGROUND: On February 17, 2016, at the direction of the Fire Board, the District purchased 3.8 acres of property located on the south side of Town Center Drive, east of Haven Avenue for a public use, namely for fire safety and protection services for building a future Fire Station 178. Much strategic analysis went into the selection of this land as the most viable location for the future fire station. The location will help maximize existing resources to better serve the central community. This new station will be based on modern construction standards and is intended to meet the District's mission for at least 50 years. On November 20, 2019, the Fire District and Mary McGrath Architects entered into a Professional Services Agreement(PSA), CO#FD19-021, for consulting services that included Project Initiation and Program Development. This initial phase identified goals and objectives, data collection, and the scope and scale of the project with the Design Team. On August 5, 2020, the Fire Board approved contract Amendment No. 001 with Mary McGrath Architects for $372,875 (including a 10% contingency) for Conceptual Design Build services of the new Fire Station 178, in accordance with the price proposal submitted in RFP# 20/21001. ANALYSIS: The conceptual design build phase for the new Fire Station 178 has been a Team RC project with input from the City Manager's Office, Planning, Engineering, and the Fire District. Mary McGrath Page 51 Architects has assisted the Design Team in architectural schematic design, landscape, cost estimate, bridging documents (detailed project specifications, structural performance requirements, grading and drainage conceptual design, sustainable goals, etc.), construction and design documents. As part of the conceptual design build phase, the District and City identified the need for issuance of two additive alternate addendums to include a Records Storage Building and a Solar/Battery Storage System for the project. The scope of work for the records storage building includes developing a revised site plan, floor plans, elevations, a building section, and wall types. The scope of work for the solar/battery storage system includes calculation of battery storage capacities, battery sizing for total connected load of the fire station, updating of the energy model, and the number/size of solar panels and batteries. FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the amendment is $44,540. The District's share is $32,410 and the City's share is $12,130. Sufficient funding is available in the FY 2021-22 budget in the Fire Protection Capital Fund under account 3288501-5650/ 1645288 for the District's share. An appropriation of$12,130 in the City's Capital Reserve Fund under account 1025001-5650/ 1645025-0 is necessary for the City's share of the amendment. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: The construction of the Fire Station 178 will promote a safe and healthy community for all by enhancing the delivery of vital life safety services and ensuring efficient response times to residents, visitors, and businesses. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Scope of Work Page 2 Page 52 ■ May 17, 2021 Deputy Chief McCliman Deputy Fire Chief of Administration and Support Rancho Cucamonga Fire District 10500 Civic Center Dr. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91729 990�%W0,d1Z ZU RE:Additional Service Request for Records Storage Building and Solar/Battery Storage Design Dear Deputy Chief McCliman, It is our pleasure to submit our proposal for the creation of two addenda for the Fire Station 178 project. We are excited to see the project moving forward and look forward to the opportunity to creating these two addenda's for the project. These documents will be prepared at a basic level of design and will include written performance requirements. These documents will allow the Design-Build contractor's team to provide a high-level order of magnitude cost proposal for the two addenda items. The fee proposal is dividing into two tasks;the Records Storage Building and the Solar/Battery Storage with Mobile Generator solution. The fee proposal for the Records Storage Building is$24,250 and the fee proposal for the Solar/Battery design is$20,290. We have an allowance in the solar fee proposal for the electrical scope because we are not sure how much input we will need from our Electrical Engineering team. We hope to have this material ready for review by early June so it can be included in the addenda to be issued on June 101h. Please see a detailed scope and fee summary attached. We look forward to the opportunity to continue our good working relationship with the City and Fire District.Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding this proposal. Sincerely, Mary McGrath,AIA, LEED°AP, President Mary McGrath Architects 510.208.9400 mmcgrath@marymcgratharchitects.com 1212 BROADWAY, SUITE 1700 ■ OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 ■ O 510.209.9400 01 WWW.MARYMCGRATHARCHITECTS.COM Page 53 SCOPE OF WORK Task 1: Records Storage Building Approach The design team will develop a revised site plan,floor plans, elevations, a building section, and wall types to provide the DB Entity an understanding of the scope and scale of the building. The building materials will match those utilized for the Fire station. The mechanical, structural, and electrical systems will be described through written performance criteria. The storage shelving basis of design document will be developed similar to the sample provided for the evidence storage space. The Civil Engineering scope of work will be described in a grading sketch. Utility service will be indicated on the architectural site plan. The design drawings will be created in an 11 x 17 format for ease of issuance. MMA will update the sketch up model for review by the Planning Department staff. We will use a Cost Per SF estimate for this addenda item. Total Fee: $24, 250 Task 2: Solar/Battery Storage System with Mobil Generator Approach Underwriters Laboratory (UL) has developed a program which is used to size commercial battery storage facilities. The design team will utilize their custom program to develop three levels of battery storage capacities for consideration. They include 24-, 48-and 72-hour storage capacities. The battery sizing will include the total connected load of the fire station as a conservative approach. The mechanical and electrical engineers will update the existing energy model to include the criteria needed by UL for this modeling. We will work with the UL team to indicate the number/size of solar panels and number/sizes of batteries for each option and indicate them on the site plan. An order of magnitude cost for the systems will be gathered by the design team for use in the Addenda solicitation. Total Fee: $20,290. 2 Page 54 Rancho Cucamonga Design Build Records Storage Building and Solar/Battery Storage Design May 17, 2021 Basis of Design Bridging Documents Project Records Storage Building Mary McGrath Principal in Project Architect SR. Architect Intermediate Technical Task 1 and site adjustments Architects Charge Manager Designer Designer Designer Editor Totals rate $195 $185 $165 $145 $125 $75 hours 12 0 0 60 0 0 total amount 1 $2,340 $0 $0 $8,700 $0 $0 $11,040 Consultant Struct. Mech/Plmb Elec/Data Civil Cost Landscape Totals Fee $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $0 $0 10%Mark-up $300 $300 $300 $300 $0 $0 total amount $3,300 $3,300 $3,300 $3,300 $0 $0 $13,200 Task 1 1 $24,240 Project Mary McGrath Principal in Project Architect SR. Architect Intermediate Technical Task 2 Solar and Battery Storage Architects Charge Manager Designer Designer Designer Editor Totals rate $195 $185 $165 $145 $125 $75 hours 16 0 0 16 0 0 total amount 1 $3,120 $0 $0 $2,320 $0 $0 $5,440 Consultant Struct. Mech/Plmb Elec/Data UL Cost Landscape Totals Fee $0 $4,000 $3,000 $6,500 $0 $0 10%Mark-up $0 $400 $300 $650 $0 $0 total amount $0 $4,400 $3,300 $7,150 $0 $0 $14,850 Allowance Task 2 1 $20,290 Total Fee: Task 1 Records Storage Building and site adjustments $24,240 Task 2 Solar and Battery Storage $20,290 $44,530 ® Page 55 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering Services/Utilities Dianna Lee, Management Analyst I SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Physical Security Plan for 2021. (RESOLUTION 2021- 062). (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends City Council: 1. Authorize, recognize, and accept the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department as a qualified Independent Third- Party Reviewer of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Security Plan (Security Plan); 2. Authorize, recognize, and accept the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District as a Qualified Authority to review the Security Plan; and 3. Approve Resolution No. 2021-XXX, adopting the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Physical Security Plan for 2021 including reports by the third party reviewer and qualified authority reviewer. BACKGROUND: In 2013, Pacific Gas and Electric's (PG&E's) Metcalf Transmission Substation was attacked by individuals using rifles or shotguns causing significant damage to equipment located within the substation. In response to the attack, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) directed the North American Reliability Corporation (NERC) to develop new physical security requirements. At the state level, Senate Bill (SB) 699 (stats. 2014) directed the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to "consider adopting rules to address the physical security risks to the distribution systems" of the investor owned utilities (IOUs). In response to SB 699, on June 11, 2015, the CPUC instituted a new rulemaking to establish policies, procedures, and rules for the regulation of physical security risks to the electric supply facilities. The CPUC's Safety and Enforcement Division (SED) developed a white paper proposing new regulations for IOUs and publicly owned utilities (POUs). Following a series of workshops conducted at the CPUC, the POUs joined with the IOUs to develop a proposal for physical security requirements for distribution-level substations, referred to as the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal. SED responded to the Straw Proposal by recommending various modifications including a more structured plan-development process. Page 56 On January 10, 2019, the CPUC adopted Decision (D.)19-01-018, which created a new physical security plan requirement that was primarily based on the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal, but as modified by the SED recommendations. D.19-01-018 requires electric utilities to develop and implement a plan that (1) identifies if there are any high-value electric distribution substations that require greater protection against intentional physical attacks; (2) assesses the risks of a successful physical attack at any identified high-value distribution substation and determines if existing protective and resiliency measures effectively mitigate these risks; and (3) identifies additional needed mitigation measures if any risks are not already effectively mitigated. Electric utilities must complete a plan even if the utility does not identify any high-value distribution substations. The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU), as a POU generally follows the distribution system safety regulations adopted by the CPUC as key industry standards. D.19-01- 018 directed POUs to present their plans to their own governing boards for approval. In addition to the requirements described above, each POU must have its plan reviewed by an independent third party. The CPUC's Decision clarified that the independence requirement can be met by another division within the same governmental entity. For example, a police department would be treated as independent from the electric utility within the same municipality. Lastly, each POU must designate a "qualified authority" to review and validate its Utility Security Plan and deem such plan as adequate by the POU's governing board. ANALYSIS: The attached Security Plan has been developed by RCMU staff with guidance from RCMU's outside legal counsel in accordance with the process set forth in D.19-01-018. RCMU selected the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (SBCSD/RCPD)to perform the qualified Third-Party review. Further, RCMU selected the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's (RCFPD's) Emergency Management Division to serve as the Qualified Authority to validate the Security Plan. RCMU staff assessed and prepared the Security Plan for 2021 in accordance with the instructions provided in D.19-01-018. A three-step evaluation process for the identification, risk-assessment, and mitigation plan elements were utilized to determine if any RCMU distribution-level facilities meets the definition of a "Covered Distribution Facility." Using the seven (7)factors identified and defined in the instructions, RCMU determined that it did not have any "Covered Distribution Facilities" within its service territory, which means RCMU would not be required to complete the evaluation and review process. However, RCMU staff has taken the position that as a best practice, it would voluntarily participate and conduct an evaluation of the risks associated with a potential physical attack on its Distribution Facility and would voluntarily determine how best to mitigate or enhance any deficiencies that may be recommended by the third party review. RCMU provided the Draft Security Plan and a thorough tour of the facility to the qualified Third- Party Reviewer to evaluate the location and physical surroundings. The Third-Party Review evaluation was completed by the SBCSD/RCPD and their findings are attached to the Security Plan as Addendum #1. RCMU then provided the Draft Security Plan and the Third-Party Review Evaluation to the Qualified Authority (RCFPD) to conduct an overall review and provided a thorough tour of the facility and its surroundings. RCFPD staff has reviewed the RCMU Utility Security Plan (including Addendum #1) and deemed it as adequate and their review is included as Addendum #2 to the Security Plan. Both processes have now been completed and the RCMU Final Security Plan is attached hereto for the City Council's review and consideration for adoption.As a result of the processes described above, it has been determined that RCMU's Security Plan is in voluntary compliance with D. 19- Page 2 Page 57 01-018 by both SBCSD/RCPD and RCFPD with respect to relevant industry standards for safety and security of RCMU's electric distribution facility. The third party reviewer provided minor recommendations to further improve security at the substation mainly related to video surveillance, landscaping maintenance, additional barriers, and facility signage. The City Council, as the governing board for RCMU is being asked to formally adopt RCMU's Security Plan. RCMU will continue to work with both reviewing agencies to voluntarily improve upon any recommendations included in this process. RCMU will update the Security Plan as deemed necessary and will repeat this process at least once every 5 years. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts by adopting this Security Plan at this time. RCMU staff will review suggested improvements and budget for them accordingly in future fiscal years. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's Core Value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring that public infrastructure is well-maintained and secure. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Resolution 2021-062 Attachment 2 — Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan for 2021 Page 3 Page 58 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA TO ADOPT RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY'S SECURITY PLAN PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DECISION 19- 01-018 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga desires to ensure that there will be safe, secure and adequate electric resources to serve all of its Municipal Utility customers; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation, is authorized under various provisions of the California Constitution and the general laws of California (including, specifically, Article XI, section 9(a) of the California Constitution, Public Utilities Code Section 10004, and Government Code Section 39732(a) to establish, purchase, and operate a public utility to furnish its inhabitants with, among other things, electricity; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) provides cost effective, reliable electric services to residents and businesses in portions of the City of Rancho Cucamonga: and WHEREAS, as a municipal electric utility, RCMU is generally subject to the legislative and regulatory requirements applicable to local publicly owned electric utilities (POUs); and WHEREAS, in 2014, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 699 (Stats. 2014, Ch. 550, Sec. 2), with an effective date of September 25, 2014, amending California Public Utilities Code Section 364, to require the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) to consider adopting rules to address the physical security risks to the distribution systems of investor owned utilities; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2019, the CPUC adopted Decision 19-01-018 directing all electric utilities to develop and implement a plan that (1) identifies distribution-level substations that require greater protection against physical attacks; (2) assesses the risks of a successful physical attack at any identified distribution-level substation and determines whether existing mitigation measures effectively mitigate these risks; and (3) identifies new security measures if any identified risks are not effectively mitigated; and WHEREAS, each POU is required to have a qualified and independent third-party review its Utility Security Plan; and WHEREAS, RCMU identified and selected the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (SBCSD/RCPD) to perform the qualified Independent Third-Party review and RCMU has incorporated and responded to the recommendations of SBCSD/RCPD in the final version of RCMU's Security Plan; and WHEREAS, RCMU has identified and selected the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) to serve as the Qualified Authority to validate RCMU's Security Plan and RCFPD has reviewed RCMU's Security Plan and validated it as adequate. Resolution No. 21-XXX— Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Page 59 RESOLUTION NO. 21-XXX June 16, 2021 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA HEREBY RESOLVES AND FINDS: SECTION 1: The City Council hereby selects and accepts SBCSD/RCPD to serve as the qualified Independent Third-Party Reviewer of RCMU's Security Plan and said report incorporated therein. SECTION 2: The City Council hereby selects and accepts the RCFPD to serve as the Qualified Authority for the review and validation of RCMU's Security Plan. SECTION 3: The City Council approves in substantive form the RCMU Utility Security Plan, dated June 16, 2021, included as Attachment 2 hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 4: The City Manager, or his duly authorized designee, is hereby authorized and directed to implement, administer, and carry out any such actions as are necessary or advisable in the furtherance of the RCMU's Security Plan. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Page 60 RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY SECURITY PLAN City of Rancho Cucamonga PUBLIC REPORT RCMU'S PHYSICAL SECURITY PROGRAM FOR DISTRIBUTION-LEVEL FACILITIES 99 WN ra- RCMU Rancl.o Cucamo Municipal Utili June 16, 2021 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 61 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Overview..............................................................................................................................................5 • Goal of Utility Security Plan...........................................................................................................5 • Description of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility..............................................................5 • Results of Utility Security PLan Assessment..................................................................................5 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................6 III. Plan Development Process................................................................................................................8 A. Physical Security Principles ...........................................................................................................8 B. Utility Security Plan Development Process..................................................................................8 STEP 1: Assessment/Plan Development.............................................................................................8 STEp 1 A: Identify Covered Distribution Facilities...............................................................................9 STEP 1 B: Perform Risk Assessment.......................................................................................................9 STEP 1 C: Develop Mitigation Plan......................................................................................................9 STEP2: Independent Review..............................................................................................................9 STEP3: Validation.................................................................................................................................9 STEP4: Adoption ................................................................................................................................ 10 STEP5: Maintenance......................................................................................................................... 10 STEP6: Repeat Process...................................................................................................................... 10 IV. Identification of Covered Distribution Faciliites (Step 1 A) ............................................................ 10 A. Identification Factors................................................................................................................... 10 B. Identification Analysis.................................................................................................................. 1 1 V. Risk Assessment (Step 1 B) ................................................................................................................. 12 A. Methodology ............................................................................................................................... 12 B. Mitigation Measures.................................................................................................................... 12 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 2 of 34 Page 62 C. Risk Assessment............................................................................................................................ 13 VI. Covered Distribution Facility Mitigation Plans (Step 1 C) .............................................................. 14 A. Substation X Mitigation Plan....................................................................................................... 14 VII. Independent Evaluation and Response (Step 2).......................................................................... 15 A. Requirements for Qualified Third Party Review........................................................................ 15 B. Identification of Third Party Reviewer........................................................................................ 15 C. Public Results of Third Party Evaluation ..................................................................................... 15 D. RCMU Response........................................................................................................................... 15 VIII. Validation (Step 3) ............................................................................................................................ 16 A. Selection of Qualified Authority................................................................................................. 16 B. Results of Qualified Authority Review........................................................................................ 16 C. RCMU Response to Qualied Authority Reivew ....................................................................... 16 IX. Narrative Descriptions for Utility Security Plan................................................................................ 17 A. Asset Management Program..................................................................................................... 17 B. Workforce Training and Retention Program ............................................................................ 17 C. Preventative Maintenance Plan................................................................................................ 17 D. Physical Security Event Training ................................................................................................. 17 E. Communication Infrastructure Risk Assessment ...................................................................... 17 F. Facility Design Features............................................................................................................... 17 X. ADDENDUM........................................................................................................................................... 18 XI. Addendum 1 - Qualified Third Party Review of RCMU's Physical Security Program for Distribution Level Facilities 19 .............................................................................................................. I. Identification of Third Party Reviewer.............................................................................................20 II. Physical Security Plans for Distribution-Level Facilities...................................................................20 A. Electric Utility Security Plans Requirements...............................................................................20 B. Qualified Third Party reviewer Requirements ...........................................................................21 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 3 of 34 Page 63 C. Utility Security Plan Requirements..............................................................................................21 STEP 1A: Identify Covered Distribution Facilities.............................................................................22 STEP 1 B: Perform Risk Assessment.....................................................................................................22 STEP 1 C: Develop Mitigation Plan....................................................................................................22 III. Evaluation of RCMU Utility Security Plan.........................................................................................23 A. Identification of Covered Distribution Facilities (Step 1 A) ......................................................23 B. Review of Risk Assessment (Step 1 B) .........................................................................................25 1. Substation X Risk Assessment...................................................................................................26 C. Voluntary Distribution Facility Mitigation Plans (Step 1 C)........................................................29 IV. Other Recommendations for Physical Security Improvements...................................................31 XII.Addendum 2- Qualified Authority Memorandum,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,33 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 4 of 34 Page 64 M A. GOAL OF UTILITY SECURITY PLAN Ensuring the safety of its facilities is a top priority for the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) prioritizes safety in all aspects of its design, operation, and maintenance practices. The overarching goal of this Utility Security Plan is to describe RCMU's risk management approach towards its distribution system physical security,with appropriate consideration for resiliency, impact, and cost. While RCMU does not have any "Covered Distribution Facilities" as defined by the CPUC, the City recognizes the importance of securing the safety and reliability of its electric system and, therefore, voluntarily participated in the California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) Physical Security proceeding and has undertaken this assessment. In the spirit of continued voluntary cooperation, the City offers the following in response to CPUC Decision 19-01-018. B. DESCRIPTION OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL UTILITY RCMU provides economic and reliable electricity to almost 2,000 metered businesses and residents in a selected area within the Southeastern portion of the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Since 2004, RCMU has continued to serve its customers with reliable electricity while maintaining lower rates than those charged by the local investor-owned utility, along with excellent customer service. C. RESULTS OF UTILITY SECURITY PLAN ASSESSMENT RCMU has one (1) substation that was assessed as part of this planning process. The substation (Substation X) is interconnected to SCE's 66 kV Subtransmission grid. It is the single point of connection for RCMU's electrical distribution system which is fed from the substation. RCMU has determined that this substation is NOT identified as a "Covered Distribution Facility" within its service territory because it did not meet any of the 7 screening factors identified in the report below. This determination in combination with the required narrative elements described above should constitute the RCMU's Utility Security Plan Assessment without the need for the creation of a Mitigation Plan. However, RCMU has taken the position that it considers it a best practice to make any security improvements found by the independent evaluation process to be invaluable to the overall operations of the utility. RCMU will take these recommendations under advisement and plan accordingly. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (SBCSD/RCPD) was selected to conduct the independent evaluation. SBCSD/RCPD evaluated Substation X and agreed with RCMU's Security Plan Assessment that it did not need to create a Mitigation Plan. Additionally, SBCSD/RCPD also agreed with RCMU's position that it considers it a Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 5 of 34 Page 65 best practice to take under advisement any suggestions submitted in Article IV of the Qualified Third-Party Review Report in Addendum 1. RCMU agrees with the independent evaluation and is currently reviewing and taking under consideration the voluntary recommendations submitted in Article IV in Addendum 1. 11. BACKGROUND On April 16, 2013, one or more individuals attacked equipment located within Pacific Gas and Electric Company's (PG&E) Metcalf Transmission Substation, ultimately damaging 17 transformers. These individuals also cut nearby fiber-optic telecommunication cables owned by AT&T. In response to the attack, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) directed the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to develop new physical security requirements, resulting in the creation of CIP-014. At the state level, Senator Jerry Hill authored SB 699 (2014), directing the CPUC to "consider adopting rules to address the physical security risks to the distribution systems of electrical corporations." In response to SB 699, the CPUC's Safety and Enforcement Division, Risk Assessment and Safety Advisory Section (RASA) prepared a white paper proposing a new requirement for investor owned utilities (IOUs) and publicly owned utilities (POUs) to develop security plans that would identify security risks to their distribution and transmission systems, and propose methods to mitigate those risks. The CPUC hosted a series of workshops to better understand the state of utility physical security protections and to seek input on refining their proposal. In order to support a statewide improvement of how utilities address distribution level physical security risks, the California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA), which is the statewide trade association for POUs, coordinated with the state's IOUs to develop a comprehensive Straw Proposal' (Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal) to serve as a process to identify at-risk facilities and, if necessary, develop physical security mitigation plans. As a member of CMUA, RCMU staff participated in the development of the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal through a CMUA working group as well as through direct meetings with the IOUs. The Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal set out a process for the following: (1) identifying if the utility has any high priority distribution facilities; (2) evaluating the potential risks to those high priority distribution facilities; (3) for the distribution facilities where the identified risks are not effectively mitigated through existing resilience/security measures, developing a mitigation plan; (4) obtaining third party reviews of the mitigation plans; (5) adopting a document retention policy; (6) ensuring a review process established by the POU governing board; and (7) implementing information sharing protocols. 1 Straw Proposal available at: https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/uploadedFiles/CPUCWebsite/Content/Safety/Risk Assessment/physicalsecurity/Rl506009- Ur)dated%20Joint%20Straw%20ProposaI%20and%20Cover%200831 17%20Filina.pdf. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 6 of 34 Page 66 RASA filed a response2 to the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal that recommended various modifications and clarifications, including a six step process. Additionally, RASA recommended that the utility mitigation plans include: (1) an assessment of supply chain vulnerabilities; (2) training programs for law enforcement and utility staff to improve communication during physical security events; and (3) an assessment of any nearby communication utility infrastructure that supports priority distribution substations. In early 2019, the CPUC approved Decision (D.) 19-01-018, which adopted the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal as modified by the RASA proposal.The CPUC Decision provided additional clarifications and guidance D.19-01-018 clarified that where there is a conflict between the Straw Proposal and the RASA proposal, then it is the rule in the RASA proposal that controls.3 D.19-01-018 asserted that the POUs should utilize the Utility Security Plan process described therein. RCMU is following the process and issuing this report at this time to reflect its existing commitment to safety and to protecting its ratepayers' investment by taking reasonable and cost-effective measures in an effort to safeguard key assets of its distribution system. 2 RASA Response available at: https://www.cpuc.ca.ciov/uploodedFiles/CPUCWebsite/Content/Safety/Risk Assessment/r)hvsicalsecurity/Final%20Staff %20Recommendation%20for'720Commission%20Consideration%20010318.pdf. 3 D.19-01-018 at 43,footnote 58("Should there be any question of which shall predominate should there be any incongruity or conflict between a utility or SED RASA recommended rule,the SED RASA rule shall apply."). Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 7 of 34 Page 67 DEVELOPMENT111111. PLAN • A. PHYSICAL SECURITY PRINCIPLES The Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal seeks to support the creation of a risk management approach toward distribution system physical security, with appropriate considerations of resiliency, impact, and cost. In order to accomplish this risk-based approach, the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal identifies several principles to guide the development of each individual utility's program. These principles are the following: 1. Distribution systems are not subject to the same physical security risks and associated consequences, including threats of physical attack by terrorists, as the transmission system. 2. Distribution utilities will not be able to eliminate the risk of a physical attack occurring, but certain actions can be taken to reduce the risk or consequences, or both, of a significant attack. 3. A one-size-fits-all standard or rule will not work. Distribution utilities should have the flexibility to address physical security risks in a manner that works best for their systems and unique situations, consistent with a risk management approach. 4. Protecting the distribution system should consider both physical security protection and operational resiliency or redundancy. 5. The focus should not be on all Distribution Facilities, but only those that risk dictates would require additional measures. 6. Planning and coordination with the appropriate federal and state regulatory and law enforcement authorities will help prepare for attacks on the electrical distribution system and thereby help reduce or mitigate the potential consequences of such attacks. B. Utility Security Plan Development Process RCMU utilized a multi-step process to develop this Utility Security Plan that is consistent with the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal and D.19-01-018. The relevant six steps of that process are the following: STEP 1 : ASSESSMENT/PLAN DEVELOPMENT RCMU staff prepared a Draft Utility Security Plan through the process set forth in Steps 1 A, 1 B, and 1 C. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 8 of 34 Page 68 STEP 1A: IDENTIFY COVERED DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES RCMU will evaluate all distribution-level facilities in its service territory that are subject to its control to determine if any facility meets D.19-01-018's definition of a "Covered Distribution Facility" using the seven factors identified in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal. STEP 1 B: PERFORM RISK ASSESSMENT For every individual Covered Distribution Facility identified pursuant to Step 1 A, RCMU will perform an evaluation of the potential risks associated with a successful physical attack on that Covered Distribution Facility, and whether existing grid resiliency, back-up generation, and/or physical security measures appropriately mitigate identified risks. STEP 1 C: DEVELOP MITIGATION PLAN If there are any individual Covered Distribution Facilities where the Risk Assessment performed pursuant to Step 1 B finds that the existing mitigation and/or resiliency measures do not effectively mitigate the identified risks, then RCMU will develop a Mitigation Plan for that Covered Distribution Facility. The Mitigation Plan will use a risk-based approach to select reasonable and cost-effective measures that can either be security focused (e.g., walls or alarms) or resiliency focused (e.g., adequate spare parts). STEP 2: INDEPENDENT REVIEW For every Utility Security Plan cycle, RCMU will document the results of the identification process, risk assessment, and Mitigation Plan development performed pursuant to Steps 1 A, 1 B, and 1 C. This documentation in combination with narrative description in Section IX below, constitutes RCMU's Draft Utility Security Plan. Each Draft Utility Security Plan is submitted to a Qualified Third Party for Independent Review. The Qualified Third Party Reviewer will then issue an evaluation that identifies any potential deficiencies in the Draft Utility Security Plan as well as recommendations for improvements. RCMU will then modify its plan to address any identified deficiencies or recommendations or will document the reasons why any recommendations were not adopted. The combination of the Draft Utility Security Plan, the non-confidential conclusions of the Qualified Third Party Reviewer, and RCMU's responses to the Qualified Third Party Review will constitute RCMU's Utility Security Plan. STEP 3: VALIDATION RCMU will submit its Utility Security Plan to a qualified authority for review. This entity will provide additional feedback and evaluation of RCMU's Utility Security Plan and, to the extent that this entity is authorized, such entity deems the Utility Security Plan as adequate. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District's Emergency Management Division was selected as the Validation Entity. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 9 of 34 Page 69 STEP 4: ADOPTION RCMU's Utility Security Plan will be presented to and adopted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga's City Council as the Governing Board at a public meeting. STEP 5: MAINTENANCE RCMU will refine and update the Utility Security Plan as appropriate and as necessary to preserve plan integrity. STEP 6: REPEAT PROCESS RCMU will repeat this six step process at least once every five years. IDENTIFICATIONOF • DISTRIBUTION As described in Section III, Step 1 A of the Utility Security Plan process involves assessing all distribution-level facilities that are subject to the control of RCMU to determine which facilities are "Covered Distribution Facilities" subject to the need for a risk assessment. This Section describes the factors that RCMU used to evaluate its distribution facilities and the results of its evaluation. A. IDENTIFICATION FACTORS The Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal defines seven screening factors to determine if a facility is a "Covered Distribution Facility." Some factors require additional definitions and/or clarifications in order to be applied to RCMU's facilities. The following Table provides the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal's Factors as modified/clarified by RCMU. Factor Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal Description Additional Clarification Distribution Facility necessary for crank path, No additional clarification. black start or capability essential to the restoration of regional electricity service that are not subject to the California 1 Independent System Operator's (CAISO) operational control and/or subject to North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard CIP-014-2 or its successors Distribution Facility that is the primary source No additional clarification. of electrical service to a military installation essential to national security and/or 2 emergency response services (may include certain airfields, command centers, weapons stations, emergency supply depots) Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 10 of 34 Page 70 Distribution Facility that serves installations An installation provides "regional necessary for the provision of regional drinking water supplies and wastewater drinking water supplies and wastewater services" if it is the primary source of 3 services (may include certain aqueducts, drinking water supply or wastewater well fields, groundwater pumps, and services for over 40,000 customer treatment plants) accounts for an area with a population of over 100,000. Distribution Facility that serves a regional RCMU defines "regional public safety public safety establishment (may include establishment" as any of the following: County Emergency Operations Centers; (1) Headquarters of a major police or county sheriff's department and major city fire department serving 1.5 million police department headquarters; major population with at least 1,000 sworn 4 state and county fire service headquarters; officers; (2) County Sheriff's county jails and state and federal prisons; Department Headquarters; (3) County and 911 dispatch centers) Emergency Operations Center; (4) County/State Fire headquarters; (5) a California State Prison; (5) a United States Penitentiary; or (6) a Federal Correctional Institute. Distribution Facility that serves a major In addition to the facilities listed in the transportation facility (may include Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal, RCMU International Airport, Mega Seaport, other defines a "major transportation facility" 5 air traffic control center, and international as any transportation facility that has border crossing) (1) an average of 600 or more flights per day; or (2) over 50,000 passengers arriving or departing er day. Distribution Facility that serves as a Level 1 No additional clarification. 6 Trauma Center as designated by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and -Development Distribution Facility that serves over 60,000 No additional clarification. meters B. IDENTIFICATION ANALYSIS In performing this identification analysis, RCMU assessed all distribution level facilities that are subject to its exclusive control, or if the facility is jointly owned, the joint ownership agreement identifies RCMU as the entity responsible for operation and maintenance. The specific types of facilities include substations. Based on this scope, RCMU has identified zero (0) "Covered Distribution Facilities" in its service territory that are subject to this identification analysis. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 11 of 34 Page 71 The following table summarizes the results of RCMU's identification analysis. Facility ID 1.Crank 2.Military 3.Regional 4.Regional 5.Major 6.Level 1 7.Over Path,Black Installation Drinking Water/ Public Safety Transportation Trauma 60,000 Start Wastewater Facility Center Meters Services Substation X N/A N/A I N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A V. RISK ASSESSMENT (STEP 1 B) A. METHODOLOGY Pursuant to the process identified in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal and D.19-01-018, RCMU will assess the potential risks associated with a successful physical attack on each of the Covered Distribution Facilities identified in Section IV above. For purpose of this analysis, a physical attack is limited to the following: (1) theft; (2) vandalism; and (3) discharge of a firearm. A "successful physical attack" is limited to circumstances where a theft, vandalism, and/or the discharge of a firearm has directly led to the failure of any elements of the Covered Distribution Facility that are necessary to provide uninterrupted service to the specific load identified in Section IV. In order to perform this risk analysis, RCMU evaluated the relative risk that (1) a physical attack on a Covered Distribution Facility could be successful considering the protective measures in place; or (2) that the impacts of a successful attack would be mitigated due to resiliency and other measures in place. B. MITIGATION MEASURES D.19-01-018 identifies the specific mitigation measures that a utility should consider when performing this risk analysis. The following table lists these mitigation measures and provides RCMU's additional clarifications that are necessary to apply these measures to the RCMU's territory. Measure DA 9-01-018 Description Additional Clarification The existing system resiliency and/or No additional clarification. redundancy solutions (e.g., switching the 1 load to another substation or circuit capable of serving the load, temporary circuit ties, mobile generation and/or storage solutions). The availability of spare assets to restore a No additional clarification. 2 particular load. The existing physical security protections to No additional clarification. 3 reasonably address the risk. The potential for emergency responders to Each facility is evaluated based on 4 identify and respond to an attack in a the likelihood that a law enforcement timely manner. officer would generally be able to Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 12 of 34 Page 72 arrive at the Covered Distribution Facility within 15 minutes of a report from the public of a break-in or attack, or of RCMU notifying the law enforcement agency of the triggering of an alarm at the facility. Location and physical surroundings, RCMU evaluated this element based including proximity to gas pipelines and on the proximity of the Covered geographical challenges, and impacts of Distribution Facility to populated areas 5 weather. and the extent to which the interior of the facility is shielded from view and access due to walls, vegetation, or other physical obstructions. History of criminal activity at the Distribution RCMU evaluated the property crime Facility and in the area. rates in the immediate vicinity of the Covered Distribution Facility and 6 compared those crimes rates to property crime rates for the county and the state to determine if the area is subject to a higher than average incidence of property related crimes. The availability of other sources of energy No additional clarification. 7 to serve the load (e.g., customer owned back-up generation or storage solutions). 8 The availability of alternative ways to meet No additional clarification. I the health, safety, or security. Requirements served by the load (e.g., No additional clarification. 9 back up command center or water storage facility). C. RISK ASSESSMENT Based on the process described in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal and the direction provided in D.19-01-018, RCMU has determined that even though there are NO Covered Distribution Facility identified in Section IV, RCMU does have existing programs and measures to effectively mitigate the risks of a physical attack for its existing substation. RCMU believes that securing our substation to be of utmost importance and critical to our overall operations.The existing measures to mitigate security risks are listed below: 1. Our existing physical perimeter is constructed of solid wrought iron fencing of 7' in height. 2. Our entrance area is a solid wrought iron security gate with key card access which is authorized by the City of Rancho Cucamonga in a department separate from RCMU; 3. Entrance into the substation facility equipment building also requires key card access which can have a different level of access; all doors automatically close and lock; 4. An additional existing physical perimeter 7' block wall,with portions of area with barbed wire on the top connects to the substation equipment building; Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 13 of 34 Page 73 5. Security cameras monitor the facility 24/7 and are monitored by a City of Rancho Cucamonga Department separate from RCMU; 6. An internal communication system is available with the City's Public Safety Departments if needed; 7. Emergency response measures and procedures are in place. The Police Department is located 2.3 miles away, and the nearest Fire Department is 1.6 miles away. The Substation X is listed in the Rancho Cucamonga Local Hazards Mitigation Plan as a critical facility for the City. 8. A prevention maintenance plan for the property and all security equipment is in place to ensure that all mitigation measures are functional and performing adequately. 9. There are no incidents of criminal activity regarding this Substation or property. 10. Spare assets and emergency call outs will be provided by RCMU's substation contractor. The follow table provides a summary of RCMU's assessment of each mitigation measure for each Covered Distribution Facility. Facility ID 1.Existing 2.Spare 3.Existing 4. 5.Location 6.Criminal 7.Back up 8-9. Risk Resiliency I Assets Physical Emergency History I Generation I Alternate Level Security Responders Solution Substation X N/A Yes I Yes Yes N/A None N/A N/A As identified above, Substation X does have existing measures sufficient to effectively mitigate the identified risks of a physical attack. These facilities are discussed in Section VI. COVERED • • I Pursuant to the process identified in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal and D.19-01-018, RCMU has determined that for Substation X, even though it is not subject to the requirements for a Covered Distribution Facility, the existing mitigation measures do effectively reduce the risk of a physical security attack. This section describes the Mitigation Plan that RCMU has developed for this voluntarily evaluated Covered Distribution Facility. A. SUBSTATION X MITIGATION PLAN RCMU believes it meets or exceeds the required voluntary mitigation measures as outlined in this report. RCMU welcomes any additional voluntary suggestions from the independent evaluation team(s) and will continue to make improvements to upgrade or enhance the safety measures currently in place. RCMU will take each item under consideration and begin the process of implementation, and schedule for budgeting and construction as noted. In some cases, the voluntary upgrade suggestions have already started before this report was finalized and have a completion date after the due date of this report. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 14 of 34 Page 74 EVALUATIONVill. INDEPENDENT RESPONSE A. REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALIFIED THIRD PARTY REVIEW D.19-01-018 specifies the following criteria for a Qualified Third Party Reviewer: Independence: A Qualified Third Party Reviewer cannot be a division of the POU. A governmental entity can select as the third-party reviewer another governmental entity within the same political subdivision, so long as the entity has the appropriate expertise, and is not a division of the POU that operates as a functional unit, i.e., a municipality could use its police department as its third-party reviewer if it has the appropriate expertise. Adequate Qualifications: A Qualified Third Party Reviewer must be an entity or organization with electric industry physical security experience and whose review staff has appropriate physical security expertise, which means that it meets at least one of the following: (1) an entity or organization with at least one member who holds either an ASIS International Certified Protection Professional (CPP) or Physical Security Professional (PSP) certification; (2) an entity or organization with demonstrated law enforcement, government, or military physical security expertise; or (3) an entity or organization approved to do physical security assessments by the CPUC, Electric Reliability Organization, or similar electrical industry regulatory body. B. IDENTIFICATION OF THIRD PARTY REVIEWER RCMU has selected the County of San Bernardino Sheriff's Department- Rancho Cucamonga Police Department (SBCSD/RCPD) as its Third Party Reviewer. The SBCSD/RCPD, as a law enforcement agency, is well qualified to review this security plan. C. PUBLIC RESULTS OF THIRD PARTY EVALUATION See the attached report submitted by the SBCSD/RCPD-Addendum 1 (Qualified Third-Party Review of RCMU's Physical Security Program for Distribution-Level Facilities). D. RCMU RESPONSE RCMU agrees with SBCSD/RCPD's assessment of the RCMU Security Assessment Plan. Additionally, RCMU accepts SBCSD/RCPD's additional voluntary recommendations and will work towards implementing as many of the recommendations as possible moving forward. RCMU also notes that some items are already underway prior to the completion of this report and/or evaluation. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 15 of 34 Page 75 VALIDATION A. SELECTION OF QUALIFIED AUTHORITY RCMU has identified and selected the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Emergency Management Division as the Qualified Authority to validate RCMU's Security Plan. RCMU is confident of their qualifications. RCMU has provided the criteria necessary for their review, inspection, and validation of the facility as well as a copy of this report including the third party independent review by SBCSD/RCPD. B. RESULTS OF QUALIFIED AUTHORITY REVIEW A copy of the Qualified Validation Authority review is attached-see Addendum 2 C. RCMU RESPONSE TO QUALIFIED AUTHORITY REVIEW RCMU has accepted the findings of the Qualified Authority Validation from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 16 of 34 Page 76 DESCRIPTIONSIX. NARRATIVE • A. ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM RCMU has identified the on-site small parts list necessary to restore operations with its substation contractor and will stock these for use as needed, ensuring that replacements and inventory will be monitored. Additionally, RCMU's substation contractor will work to ensure that any additional parts required will be identified in the event of an emergency and will assist with outsourcing these parts. RCMU has also researched a vendor providing larger equipment and parts, such as mobile transformers. These resources will continue to be evaluated on an ongoing basis in an effort to locate items for availability and optimization. B. WORKFORCE TRAINING AND RETENTION PROGRAM RCMU is a small POU and its electric substation is unmanned, therefor City workforce technicians do not have the required expertise to make any repairs inside the substation. However, RCMU maintains a City contract for services with highly-qualified substation contractors that can make the necessary repairs when called upon. Additionally, RCMU's existing medium/high voltage contractors are also trained to assess and troubleshoot problems occurring at the substation. C. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE PLAN RCMU has a very proactive preventative maintenance plan for its substation. RCMU has taken steps to implement a preventative maintenance plan for security equipment to ensure that mitigation measures are functional and performing adequately. Frequency of maintenance tests and recommendations are in accordance with: o American National Standards Institute's (ANSI) standards for Maintenance Testing Specifications for Electrical Power Equipment and Systems; o Utility industry standard best practices and guidelines for standard maintenance of electrical substations, and, o Power System Maintenance Manuals and industry best practices. D. PHYSICAL SECURITY EVENT TRAINING RCMU participates with the RCFPD, SBCSD/RCPD and other local agencies in tabletop exercises, that may include Substation X in the exercise. Local agencies receive updated maps and contact information as required. E. COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE RISK ASSESSMENT N/A F. FACILITY DESIGN FEATURES Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 17 of 34 Page 77 RCMU is reviewing the suggested voluntary improvements listed by SBCSD/RCPD in their report. Many have been addressed with the appropriate responsible parties, such as the City's facilities maintenance division. Consideration is being given to structural upgrades/additions. Surveillance camera upgrades are already underway. I X. ADDENDUM INDEX I ■ RCMU has included two (2) required addendum reports as follows: ADDENDUM 1. -San Bernardino County Sheriff/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department's Third Party Reviewer's report (pages 19-32). ADDENDUM 2.- Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District's Qualified Authority Review (page 33). Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 18 of 34 Page 78 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERIFF ' S DEPARTMENT r, t- w##i 1 QUALIFIED THIRD- PARTY REVIEW OF RCMU'S PHYSICAL SECURITY PROGRAM FOR DISTRIBUTION - LEVEL FACILITIES fa NO A FWA r,-9 R MU Rancho Cucamo Municipal Utility April 21, 2021 ADDENDUM 1 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 19 of 34 Page 79 IDENTIFICATION1. OF The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department(SBCSD), City of Rancho Cucamonga Police Department(RCPD). The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department is the law enforcement agency for the largest geographical county in the nation. The department serves over 2.1 million residents, with 8 county and 14 contract patrol stations and approximately 3,900 employees to ensure the quality and safety of those we serve. Rancho Cucamonga Police Department is a contract patrol station. The SBCSD has provided services for the City of Rancho Cucamonga since it incorporated in 1977 and the station has grown tremendously since then. RCPD provides security to over 177,000 residents and currently there are approximately 182 Sheriff's personnel serving the citizens in nearly 38 square miles. RCPD is a full-service station which not only provides proficient patrol services, but also provides a significant full-service traffic division, Major Accident Investigation Team (MATT), a commercial enforcement unit, parking enforcement, business, and specialty expertise services. SBCSD also provides a variety of support services that are available to the City as a part of this contract, including but not limited to Criminal Intelligence and Analysis, Threat Analysis and Anti-Terrorism Liaison services. To that end, SBCSD meets and exceeds the "Qualified Third Party Reviewer criteria listed in II.(B) below. PHYSICAL SECURITY PLANS FOR • I A. ELECTRIC UTILITY SECURITY PLANS REQUIREMENTS California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision (D.) 19-01-018 directs all electric utilities to develop a physical security plan for the distribution-level facilities located within the electric utility's service territory. Publicly owned electric utilities (POUs) generally treat the CPUC's safety rules for electric supply systems as key industry standards. Accordingly, Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) has developed a Utility Security Plan consistent with the direction provided in D.19-01-018. Specifically, is Utility Security Plan must do the following: (1) assess whether any RCMU controlled distribution level facilities are necessary to maintain electric service to a critical load with regional impacts; (2) if such facilities are identified, then the Utility Security Plan must evaluate whether existing security measures sufficiently reduce the risk of a successful attack or mitigate the impacts of successful attack; and (3) for any facility where the existing security measures are found to not be sufficient, develop a mitigation plan to address these issues. D.19-01-018 further directs electric utilities to have a qualified third party evaluate the Utility Security Plan and identify any potential deficiencies as well as provide any recommendations for improvements. This report serves as the Qualified Third Party Review of RCMU's Utility Security Plan. In summary, this report finds the following: • Identification: RCMU correctly determined that there are no "covered facilities" (as defined in the RCMU Utility Security Report), that are controlled by RCMU and which are located within RCMU's service territory. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 20 of 34 Page 80 • Risk Assessment: The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department (SBCSD)/RCPD, agreed with the analysis of existing mitigation measures at any covered facilities or any voluntarily identified facilities. • Mitigation Plans: Mitigation plan defined in "Alternate (2)" assessment of the proposed measures by SBCSD/RCPD has agreed with RCMU's plan, and has provided to RCMU additional voluntary recommendations as outlined in "Article IV". • Other Recommendations for Improvements:SBCSD/RCPD does include additional voluntary site security and exterior protection measures for RCMU to consider as additional best practices, for further information see "Article IV". B. QUALIFIED THIRD-PARTY REVIEWER REQUIREMENTS D.19-01-018 specifies that a Qualified Third Party Reviewer must meet both of the following requirements: Independence: A Qualified Third Party Reviewer cannot be a division of the POU. A governmental entity can select as the third-party reviewer another governmental entity within the same political subdivision, so long as the entity has the appropriate expertise, and is not a division of the POU that operates as a functional unit, i.e., a municipality could use its police department as its third-party reviewer if it has the appropriate expertise. Adequate Qualifications: A Qualified Third Party Reviewer must be an entity or organization with electric industry physical security experience and whose review staff has appropriate physical security expertise, which means that it meets at least one of the following: (1) an entity or organization with at least one member who holds either an ASIS International Certified Protection Professional (CPP) or Physical Security Professional (PSP) certification; (2) an entity or organization with demonstrated law enforcement, government, or military physical security expertise; or (3) an entity or organization approved to do physical security assessments by the CPUC, Electric Reliability Organization, or similar electrical industry regulatory body. The San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/Rancho Cucamonga Police Department meets the "independence"requirements described in D.19-01-018. Further, the SBCSD/RCPD has adequate qualifications including: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), Non Profit Security Grant Vulnerability Assessment, Behavioral Threat Assessment-Preventing the Active Shooter, Targeting - Sabotage and Disruption of Public Utilities. Therefore, the SBCSD/RCPD meets both of the relevant requirements and is eligible to serve as a Qualified Third Party Reviewer. C. UTILITY SECURITY PLAN REQUIREMENTS D.19-01-018 provides the following three step process for the identification, risk-assessment, and mitigation plan development elements of a Utility Security Plan. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 21 of 34 Page 81 STEP 1 A: IDENTIFY COVERED DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES RCMU evaluates all distribution-level facilities in its service territory that are subject to its control in order to determine if any facility meets the definition of a "Covered Distribution Facility," using the seven factors identified in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal, as further defined in the RCMU Utility Security Plan. STEP 1 B: PERFORM RISK ASSESSMENT For every individual Covered Distribution Facility identified pursuant to Step 1 A, RCMU performs an evaluation of the potential risks associated with a successful physical attack on that Covered Distribution Facility, and whether existing grid resiliency, back-up generation, and/or physical security measures appropriately mitigate the identified risks. STEP 1 C: DEVELOP MITIGATION PLAN If there are any individual Covered Distribution Facilities where the Risk Assessment performed pursuant to Step 1 B finds that the existing mitigation and/or resiliency measures do not effectively mitigate the identified risks, then RCMU will develop a Mitigation Plan for that Covered Distribution Facility. The Mitigation Plan will use a risk-based approach to select reasonable and cost-effective measures that can either be security focused (e.g., walls or alarms) or resiliency focused (e.g., adequate spare parts). This report evaluates each of these three steps in the Utility Security Plan development process. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 22 of 34 Page 82 EVALUATIONOF A. IDENTIFICATION OF COVERED DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES (STEP 1 A) The Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal defines seven screening factors to determine if a facility is a "Covered Distribution Facility." Those factors are further defined in the RCMU Utility Security Plan. The following table provides San Bernardino County Sheriff Department's assessment of the identification analysis performed by RCMU. Factor Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal Description Identification in RCMU Plan Assessment of Qualified Third Party Distribution Facility necessary for crank path, black start or capability essential to the restoration of regional Third Party Reviewer Assessment: electricity service that are not subject to the California RCMU correctly determined that no 1 Independent System Operator's (CAISO) operational [N/A] Distribution Facility is necessary for the control and/or subject to North American Electric purposes identified in Factor 1. Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standard CIP- 014-2 or its successors Distribution Facility that is the primary source of Third Party Reviewer Assessment: electrical service to a military installation essential to RCMU correctly determined that no 2 national security and/or emergency response services [N/A] Distribution Facility is the primary source of (may include certain airfields, command centers, electrical service for a location identified in weapons stations, emergency supply depots) Factor 2. No military installations are served by RCMU. Distribution Facility that serves installations necessary for Third Party Reviewer Assessment: the provision of regional drinking water supplies and RCMU correctly determined that no wastewater services (may include certain aqueducts, Distribution Facility is necessary for a facility well fields, groundwater pumps, and treatment plants. meeting the definition in Factor 3. No 3 Additional Clarification: An installation provides [N/A] facility in POU's service territory is the "regional drinking water supplies and wastewater primary source of drinking water or services" if it is the primary source of drinking water wastewater services for over 40,000 supply or wastewater services for over 40,000 customer customers or for an area with over 100,000 accounts for an area with a population of over 100,000. residents. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 23 of 34 Page 83 Distribution Facility that serves a regional public safety establishment (may include County Emergency Operations Centers; county sheriff's department and major city police department headquarters, major state and county fire service headquarters, county jails and state and federal prisons; and 911 dispatch centers. Third Party Reviewer Assessment: Additional Clarification: RCMU defines "regional public RCMU correctly determined that no 4 safety establishment" as any of the following: (1) [N/A] Distribution Facility serves a regional public Headquarters of a major police or fire department safety establishment as defined in Factor 4. serving 1.5 million population with at least 1,000 sworn officers; (2) County Sheriff's Department Headquarters; (3) County Emergency Operations Center; (4) County/State Fire headquarters; (5) a California State Prison; (5) a United States Penitentiary; or (6) a Federal Correctional Institute. Distribution Facility that serves a major transportation facility (may include International Airport, Mega Seaport, other air traffic control center, and international border crossing. Third Party Reviewer Assessment: RCMU correctly determined that no Additional Clarification: In addition to the facilities listed 5 [N/A] Distribution Facility serves a major in the Joint IOU/POU Straw Proposal, RCMU defines a transportation facility as defined in Factor "major transportation facility" as any transportation 5 facility that has (1) an average of 600 or more flights per day; or (2) over 50,000 passengers arriving or departing per day. Distribution Facility that serves as a Level 1 Trauma Third Party Reviewer Assessment: 6 Center as designated by the Office of Statewide Health N/A] RCMU correctly determined that no Planning and Development Distribution Facility serves a Level I Trauma Center. Distribution Facility that serves over 60,000 meters Third Party Reviewer Assessment: 7 [N/A] RCMU correctly determined that no Distribution Facility serves over 60,000 meters. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 24 of 34 Page 84 Summary of Third-Party Reviewer Assessment: Based on the analysis described above, SBCSD/RCPD has determined RCMU correctly identified no Distribution Facilities as meeting the definition for a Covered Facility. San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department/RCPD agrees with RCMU's determination to voluntarily perform a risk analysis on distribution facilities that are of high value, while not meeting the definitions above. For purposes of this report, these substations are referred to as "Voluntary Distribution Facilities." B. REVIEW OF RISK ASSESSMENT (STEP 1 B) The RCMU Utility Security Plan assessed the potential risks associated with a successful physical attack on each of the "Voluntary Distribution Facilities" as identified in Step 1A. For purpose of this analysis, a physical attack is limited to the following: (1) theft; (2) vandalism; and (3) discharge of a firearm. A "successful physical attack" is limited to circumstances where a theft, vandalism, and/or the discharge of a firearm has directly led to the failure of any elements of the Substation that are necessary to provide uninterrupted service to any relevant public health and safety loads, as described above. For this review, the SBCSD/RCPD assessed RCMU's evaluation of the relative risk that (1) a physical attack on a Voluntary Distribution Facility will be successful considering the protective measures in place; or (2) that the impacts of a successful attack will be mitigated due to resiliency and other measures in place. To perform this review, SBCSD/RCPD took the following steps: Law enforcement personnel conducted a site security assessment of Substation X and an in-the-field evaluation of the facility. The site assessment was conducted to gather important information about Substation X that can be utilized by law enforcement, fire, paramedics, and other emergency services agencies during a natural human -caused, or technical hazard crisis event. The following table[s] provides a summary SBCSD/RCPD evaluation for each identified Substation. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 25 of 34 Page 85 1 . SUBSTATION X RISK ASSESSMENT Review of Risk Mitigation Assessment for Substation X Measure I Risk Mitigation Category RCMU's Assessment I Third Party Reviewer I Evaluation The existing system resiliency RCMU has one (1) substation that was assessed.The City owned and/or redundancy solutions substation is interconnected to SCE's sub-transmission grid. It is (e.g., switching the load to the single point of connection for RCMU's electrical distribution another substation or circuit system fed from the substation. capable of serving the load, RCMU has determined that this substation is NOT identified as a temporary circuit ties, mobile "Covered Distribution Facility" within its service territory Third Party Reviewer generation and/or storage because it did not meet any of the 7 screening factors Evaluation: solutions). identified in the report below. This determination in combination RCMU correctly with the required narrative elements described above should 1 constitute the RCMU's Utility Security Plan Assessment without determined the the need for the creation of a Mitigation Plan. aforementioned RCMU has taken the position that it considers it a best practice from their own assessment. to make any security improvements found by the independent evaluation process to be invaluable to the overall operations of the utility. RCMU will take these recommendations under advisement and plan accordingly. The availability of spare RCMU has contracted with Siemens Industry, Inc. to provide assets to restore a particular Substation X maintenance, spare parts have been identified load. and are to be located on site as well as other items deemed Third Party Reviewer necessary by RCMU. By using Siemens' additional outside Evaluation: contacts and resources to search and source the larger more RCMU correctly 2 significant components as well as additional 'stand-by' determined the resources. aforementioned from their own assessment. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 26 of 34 Page 86 Review of Risk Mitigation Assessment for Substation X Measure Risk Mitigation Category RCMU's Assessment Third Party Reviewer I Evaluation The existing physical security RCMU security protections include fencing, locks, key card Third Party Reviewer protections to reasonably access, alarm, cameras, security gate w/ key card access. Evaluation: address the risk. Signage regarding no access, dangers are posted. RCMU correctly determined the 3 aforementioned from their own assessment. See mitigation article IV for the additional recommendations. The potential for emergency The facility was evaluated based on the likelihood that a law responders to identify and enforcement officer would generally be able to arrive at the respond to an attack in a Covered Distribution Facility within 15 minutes of a report from timely manner. the public of a break-in or attack, or of RCMU notifying the law enforcement agency of triggering of an alarm at the facility. Additional Clarification: Each There are several city departments involved as well from Public facility is evaluated based Works - Facilities, to Fire and Police. Third Party Reviewer on the likelihood that a law Evaluation: enforcement officer would RCMU correctly 4 generally be able to arrive at determined the the Covered Distribution aforementioned Facility within 15 minutes of a from their own report from the public of a assessment. break-in or attack, or of RCMU notifying the law enforcement agency of triggering of an alarm at the facility. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 27 of 34 Page 87 Review of Risk Mitigation Assessment for Substation X Measure Risk Mitigation Category RCMU's Assessment Third Party Reviewer Evaluation Location and physical surroundings, including RCMU has evaluated this element based on the proximity of the proximity to gas pipelines Covered Distribution Facility to populated areas and the extent and geographical to which the interior of the facility is shielded from view and challenges, and impacts of access due to walls, vegetation, or other physical obstructions weather. and finds no additional shielding needed. Third Party Reviewer Additional Clarification: Evaluation: RCMU evaluated this RCMU correctly 5 element based on the determined the proximity of the Covered aforementioned Distribution Facility to from their own populated areas and the assessment. extent to which the interior of the facility is shielded from view and access due to walls, vegetation, or other physical obstructions. History of criminal activity at the Distribution Facility and in the area. Additional Clarification: None applicable to this facility. This facility is not at a higher Third Party Reviewer RCMU evaluated the property crime rates in the risk than other areas. Evaluation: immediate vicinity of the RCMU correctly 6 Covered Distribution Facility determined the and compared those crimes aforementioned rates to property crime rates from their own for the county and the state assessment. to determine if the area is subject to a higher than average incidence of property related crimes. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 28 of 34 Page 88 Review of Risk Mitigation Assessment for Substation X Measure Risk Mitigation Category RCMU's Assessment Third Party Reviewer Evaluation The availability of other RCMU does not have the availability of other sources of energy Third Party Reviewer sources of energy to serve to serve the load. Evaluation: the load (e.g., customer RCMU correctly 7 owned back-up generation determined the or storage solutions). aforementioned from their own assessment. The availability of alternative Third Party Reviewer ways to meet the health, RCMU does not have the ability to provide for the availability of Evaluation: safety, or security. alternative ways to meet the health, safety, or security. RCMU correctly 8 determined the aforementioned from their own assessment. Requirements served by the Third Party Reviewer load (e.g., back up RCMU does have a circuit by circuit analysis which identifies Evaluation: command center or water essential facilities within its service area. The analysis does RCMU correctly 9 storage facility). identify some facilities that have backup power, but not all. determined the aforementioned from their own assessment. Risk Assessment Conclusion for Substation X: Statements noted by the City of Rancho Cucamonga describing the Utility's infrastructure and functions of the POU have not been confirmed (substantiated), by the SBCSD/RCPD. The objective of this report is to identify threat risks, Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) compliance and determine if the existing measures, as identified by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as they pertain to identified risks are sufficient and SBCSD/RCPD agree that no Mitigation Plan is warranted. C. VOLUNTARY DISTRIBUTION FACILITY MITIGATION PLANS (STEP 1 C) Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 29 of 34 Page 89 RCMU's Utility Security Plan identified no Distribution Facilities for which the existing mitigation measures did not adequately address the identified risks. Therefore, no individual substation mitigation plans were prepared. As described above, SBCSD/RCPD agrees with RCMU's Security Plan Assessment and that no Mitigation Plan is warranted. SBCSD/RCPD also agrees with RCMU's position that it considers it a best practice to make any security improvements found by the independent evaluation process to be invaluable to the overall operations of the utility. And that RCMU will take these recommendations under advisement and plan accordingly. Please refer to the Voluntary Security Recommendations in Article IV. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 30 of 34 Page 90 OTHER • • FOR • • Voluntary Security Recommendations Conclusions for Substation X: This security site assessment report may also be used by appropriate City/County decision makers to consider and implement security enhancements that may potentially mitigate vulnerabilities related to identified hazards and/or adversarial actions. Potential Mitigation Vulnerability Measures: Exterior Security: • Security/Notification Signage: There are signs warning of High Voltage, but no security or notification signage is present along the perimeter fence line to inform individuals of expected behavior and prohibited activities on property. Also, there is no signage for prohibited items allowed on the property or within the building. ["No Trespassing", "Authorized Personnel Only"]. Other signage should be considered that provides information to individuals what prohibited items are not allowed to be brought on to the property or into the facility. "Violators will be charged with criminal trespass". • Video Surveillance-Video Surveillance System (VSS) implemented within Substation X, will provide minimal to satisfactory coverage. Video coverage does not include the exterior of the building and yard coverage should be expanded. • Plans to upgrade and replace the existing (4) cameras to current software and technology are underway. Fiber optic networking will replace existing analog, preventing disruption of radio signals • Plans to install an additional minimum of(4) new video cameras to provide detailed images of vehicles, individuals, and activities along the North, South and East perimeter, and expand yard coverage, have also been put in motion. • Local and remote video monitoring-This facility is unmanned; therefore, the City's Public Works-Facilities Department manages the VSS and has 24/7 access to view all activity as it relates to this property. They have the ability to share this VSS with RCMU staff and the Police Department at any moment, and have access at their workstation and at the control center (the City's IT Department) with means to share VSS information with Federal, State or Local Law Enforcement Officer(LEO) agencies upon request and during a crisis event. • No signage to indicate Video surveillance and recording was present, externally at entrances prior to where individuals may enter the fence line, into the building, nor within the building itself for areas where video of activities was being recorded. • Consider adding Signage providing notification to all citizens (employee or visitor) is required for areas under video surveillance, externally or internally of a building. Post at each entrance and/or public area where video cameras are present. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 31 of 34 Page 91 • Landscape Maintenance-Bushes and vegetation along the Southern and western fence line are filling in and growing tall. Tree limbs are growing to a length and size that they may be used as a breaching aid over the fence and onto the substation. Grooming bushes and vegetation on Southern and Western fence line should be considered to allow natural surveillance to those individuals walking near the bushes. Landscaping procedures should be adopted for vegetation height to ensure no individual can use vegetation as a place to lurk, hide, attack, or use that vegetation as a breaching aid onto the property. Recommended height of bushes and vegetation is no taller than 18 inches in most circumstances. • Consider adding Concrete bollards in front of the entrance/exit gate to prevent automotive vehicles from colliding or crashing into the substation, pedestrians and or structures, whether intentional from ram-raids and vehicle ramming attacks or unintentional losses of control. • Consider adding Barbed wire, steel fencing wire constructed with sharp edges or points arranged at intervals along the strands, used atop of the walls surrounding the secured portion of the property. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 32 of 34 Page 92 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT ` MEMORANDUM Date: July 7, 2021 To: Mayor and Members of the City Council John R. Gillison, City Manager Jason Welday, Director of Engineering Services Fred Lyn, Deputy Director of Engineering / Utilities From: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District By: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Rob Ball, Fire Marshal Joseph Ramos, Emergency Management Coordinator Subject: Review of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) Decision (D.) 19-01-018 directs all electric utilities to develop a Utility Security Plan assessing the physical security risks to certain significant, distribution-level substations that are operated by the utility and identifying mitigating measures for those risks. These Utility Security Plans must be evaluated by a qualified third party, and any recommendations of that third party must be addressed in the Utility Security Plan. As an additional level of review, the Utility Security Plan of any publicly owned utility (POU) must be submitted to a "qualified authority," which must make a recommendation on the overall adequacy of the plan. After the review by the qualified authority, the finalized plan of a POU is submitted to its governing board for adoption. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) has determined that Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (RCFPD) has sufficient familiarity with relevant federal, state, and local standards relating to critical asset protection and emergency response in order to serve as the "qualified authority" for the review of RCMU's Utility Security Plan. RCFPD has relevant experience in its role of providing all-hazard emergency preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery efforts for the District's service area including residents, businesses and visitors. On May 24, 2021, RCMU submitted its draft Utility Security Plan to RCFPD for review. The scope of RCFPD's review is to assess the overall adequacy of the plan, based on the reviewer's ADDENDUM Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 33 of 34 Page 93 01 RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIRE DISTRICT expertise. In this review, RCFPD makes no claims regarding the compliance of RCMU's Utility Security Plan with any specific requirement or standard. Further, RCFPD has not assessed, and makes no claim regarding, RCMU's Utility Security Plan's conformance to D.19-01-018 or any other CPUC standards. RCMU has also indicated in this Security Plan that they are exempt, however have chosen, as a best practice, to participate in the process. Finally, RCFPD's review is limited to the information contained within RCMU's Utility Security Plan, and RCFPD has not performed any additional audits of any identified facilities or reviewed any documents outside of the information directly included within the Utility Security Plan. Also, on May 24, 2021, RCFPD participated in a walk-through of RCMU's Electrical Substation hosted by RCMU which provided RCFPD with an opportunity to see first-hand security measures in place and share suggestions with staff. RCFPD provided RCMU with suggestions to consider in making additional safety and security improvements at the Substation which RCMU has included within the Utility Security Plan. Based on this review, RCFPD deems the RCMU's Utility Security Plan adequate and recommends that the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopt the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan. Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Security Plan June 16, 2021 Page 34 of 34 Page 94 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ernie Perez, Chief of Police Craig J. Harris, Administrative Lieutenant Karen Hunt, Sheriff's Service Specialist SUBJECT: Consideration of an Appropriation in the Amount of $489,000 from the Law Enforcement Reserve fund for the Purchase of Fixed Position Automated License Plate Reader Cameras to be Installed at Four Intersections. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the purchase of fixed position automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras to be installed at four intersections — Eastbound and Southbound Day Creek Avenue/Foothill Boulevard, East Avenue/Victoria Street, Fourth Street/Etiwanda Avenue and 8th Street/Vineyard Avenue from Vigilant Solutions as a sole source vendor in the amount of$489,000 from the Law Enforcement Reserve Fund. BACKGROUND: In the fall of 2014, the Police Department, with the approval of the City Council, embarked on the initial installation of both mobile and fixed ALPR cameras. Since then, the patrol fleet has been equipped with twelve 4-camera mobile ALPR platforms, two traffic trailers with 2-cameras each and cameras installed at a total of fifteen intersections throughout the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Data from these cameras is loaded into a shared database maintained by the vendor, Vigilant Solutions, and is used routinely to search for a variety of felony subjects associated with criminal activity occurring with in the region. These cameras have proven to be very effective in the solving of felony crimes since their placement in the spring of 2015. ANALYSIS: The proposed installation is an expansion of the existing ALPR footprint envisioned for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The equipment at Eastbound and Southbound Day Creek Avenue/Foothill Boulevard, East Avenue/Victoria Street, Fourth Street/Etiwanda Avenue and 8th Street/Vineyard Avenue will provide fixed camera coverage for each lane of traffic in all directions at these four intersections. The data from these cameras will continue to be used to investigate and solve crimes occurring with in the region. FISCAL IMPACT: The four project locations, at a total cost of $489,000, will roll out one at a time and will be completed during Fiscal Year 2021/22. The cost includes tax, delivery, custom installation and an extended service warranty and Camera License Key costs for five years. During recent fixed Page 95 ALPR installations, we've learned that some of the City conduit accessed during the projects are not adequate to run the project cabling through. Each of these four project locations has a $10,000 contingency amount added to ensure enough funds to troubleshoot any of these conduit issues. Funding for these projects is included in the FY2021/22 Adopted Budget in the Law Enforcement Reserve Fund. The cost per location is as follows: EB & SB Day Creek Ave/Foothill Blvd East Ave/Victoria St Fourth St/Etiwanda Ave 8th St/Vineyard Ave 1017701-5603 $401,250.00 1017701-5300 $ 87,750.00 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: PUBLIC SAFETY- This project is in alignment with the Current Council Goals #6- Complete the ALPR ring around Rancho Cucamonga, including all turn movement at all freeway on/off ramps and key major intersections by 2022. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Vigilant Quotation — GSM-1310-02 Attachment 2 - Vigilant Quotation —GSM-1259-06 Attachment 3 - Vigilant Quotation —GSM-1259-07 Attachment 4 - Vigilant Quotation —GSM-1259-08 Attachment 5 - PSA Amendment#8 Page 2 Page 96 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 1 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page 97 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 98 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote ID: GSM-1310-02 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (6) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $42,000.00 Qty Item# Description (2) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,400.00 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,094.00 Page 99 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (2) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -30 FT CABLE-30FT 30FT Camera Cable- ReaperHD Only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (4) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (6) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,700.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install 1 Installation of 2 Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 4-Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $6,200.00 Qty Item# Description (6) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $12,000.00 Page 100 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $330.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Tax Tax on Hardware at 7.75% Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,122.54 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $91,296.54 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 101 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 2 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page102 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page103 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-06 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (5) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $35,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,745.00 Page104 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,500.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 105 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $275.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 5 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $19,050.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,110.99 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) 1 $97,230.99 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 106 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 3 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page107 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 108 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-07 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (8) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $56,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,792.00 Page 109 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (8) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,400.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 8 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $22,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,000.00 Qty Item# Description (8) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $16,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,600.00 Page 110 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit Vigilant certified technician to visit client site Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $440.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,889.38 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister -925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $135,421.38 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 111 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 4 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page112 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 113 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-08 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (7) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $49,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,443.00 Page114 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,100.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $8,750.00 Qty Item# Description (7) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,700.00 Qty Item# Description (7) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 115 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $385.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 7 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $21,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,296.59 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $122,274.59 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 116 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 1 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page117 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 118 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote ID: GSM-1310-02 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (6) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $42,000.00 Qty Item# Description (2) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,400.00 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,094.00 Page 119 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (2) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -30 FT CABLE-30FT 30FT Camera Cable- ReaperHD Only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (4) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (6) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,700.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install 1 Installation of 2 Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 4-Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $6,200.00 Qty Item# Description (6) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $12,000.00 Page 120 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $330.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Tax Tax on Hardware at 7.75% Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,122.54 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $91,296.54 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 121 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 2 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page122 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page123 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-06 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (5) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $35,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,745.00 Page124 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,500.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 125 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $275.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 5 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $19,050.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,110.99 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) 1 $97,230.99 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 126 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 3 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page127 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 128 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-07 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (8) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $56,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,792.00 Page 129 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (8) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,400.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 8 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $22,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,000.00 Qty Item# Description (8) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $16,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,600.00 Page 130 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit Vigilant certified technician to visit client site Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $440.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,889.38 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister -925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $135,421.38 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 131 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 4 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page132 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page133 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-08 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (7) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $49,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,443.00 Page134 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,100.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $8,750.00 Qty Item# Description (7) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,700.00 Qty Item# Description (7) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 135 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $385.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 7 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $21,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,296.59 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $122,274.59 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 136 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 1 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page137 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 138 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: EB & SB for Foothill and Day Creek Quote ID: GSM-1310-02 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (6) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $42,000.00 Qty Item# Description (2) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,400.00 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,094.00 Page 139 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (2) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -30 FT CABLE-30FT 30FT Camera Cable- ReaperHD Only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (4) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (6) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,700.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install 1 Installation of 2 Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 4-Camera Fixed System Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $6,200.00 Qty Item# Description (6) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $12,000.00 Page 140 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (6) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $330.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Tax Tax on Hardware at 7.75% Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,122.54 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $91,296.54 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 141 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 2 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page142 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page143 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: East and Victoria - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-06 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (5) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $35,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,745.00 Page144 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $1,500.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $7,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,500.00 Qty Item# Description (5) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,250.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 145 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (5) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $275.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 5 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $19,050.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $4,110.99 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) 1 $97,230.99 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 146 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 3 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page147 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page 148 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: Etiwanda and 4th - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-07 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (8) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $56,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,792.00 Page 149 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (8) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,400.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 8 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $22,200.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $10,000.00 Qty Item# Description (8) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $16,800.00 Qty Item# Description (8) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,600.00 Page 150 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit Vigilant certified technician to visit client site Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Qty Item# Description (8) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges • Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $440.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,889.38 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister -925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $135,421.38 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 151 Page 4 of 4 III G I LAN T SOLUTIONS Q • for: City Of • Cucamonga Attn: Karen Hunt Reference: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote By: Nickolas Kister Date: 01 -25-21 VIE31LANT Attachment 4 S 0 L 1.1 T I 1-1 N S Page 152 VIGILANT S ❑ L U T 10 N S Vigilant Solutions is about protecting officers, families and communities. Vigilant is about saving lives — creating innovative and essential intelligence solutions for law enforcement that enhance policing efforts. Intelligence can solve crimes, prevent crimes before they occur, and improve safety for officers and the public that they serve and protect. Vigilant's solutions are designed to collect, organize and share data to credentialed law enforcement personnel, making intelligence actionable and readily accessible. WHAT WE DO: REDUCE OFFICER INCREASE REVENUE CRIME RATES SAFETY EFFICIENCY & DISCOVERY/ PRODUCTIVITY RECOVERY OUR PRODUCTS: • License Plate Recognition (LPR) Data and Analytics • Fixed and Mobile LPR Cameras • Facial Recognition • Ballistics Analysis • Crime Mapping and Analytics • Campus Safety Solutions • Parking Enforcement Solutions • Corporate Security Solutions BE SAFE.BE SMART.BE VIGILANT. VIG I LANTSCLUTIONS.COM•925-398-2079 Page153 Page 1 of 4 Vigilant Solutions, LLC 10, 1152 Stealth Street / ► OrO► OLA SOLUT1ON5 VIGILANT Livermore, California 94551 1 S ❑ L U T 10 ICJ S (P) 925-398-2079 (F) 925-398-2113 Issued To: City Of Rancho Cucamonga -Attention: Karen Hunt Date: 01-25-21 Project Name: 8th and Vineyard - 5 Year Plan Quote ID: GSM-1259-08 PROJECT QUOTATION We at Vigilant Solutions, LLC are pleased to quote the following systems for the above referenced project: Qty Item# Description (7) VSF-025-RHD Vigilant Fixed LPR ReaperHD Camera with Sun Shield -25mm Lens with Camera Cable - Standard ReaperHD Camera Hardware: • Dual-lens camera with infrared LEDs for plate illumination up to 75'capture distance • Camera housing with included sunshield is IP67 rated for reliable use in varied weather conditions • 30'camera cable included Software: • Direct connect to Vigilant's nationally hosted LEARN LPR data server o Includes CarDetector LPR software for local server hosting • LPR vehicle license plate scanning/real time alerting o Full suite of LPR tools including data analytics Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $49,000.00 Qty Item# Description (4) BCAV1 F2-C600 Vigilant Fixed Camera Communications Box • Manages power and communications for up to four(4)Vigilant fixed LPR cameras • Includes modem for communication with cellular carriers o SIM Card not included Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,800.00 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-FX-UNI-POLE- Fixed LPR Camera Bracket WALL-BRKT_REV_B . Pole or Wall Mount- UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK REV B • UPR ARM ASSY POLE&WALL MOUNT BLK Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,443.00 Page 154 Page 2 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) REAPERHD-CAMERA- ReaperHD Camera Cable -60 FT CABLE-60FT . For use with ReaperHD cameras only Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $2,100.00 Qty Item# Description (1) TAS-UL Target Alert Service - LPR Alert Delivery Software - Unlimited User • Real Time LPR notification and mapping software sends LPR alerts to any in-network PC • Send Alerts over any communication protocol including LAN,WAN, internet wireless, etc. • Server Client software compatible with all Vigilant CDFS applications Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $0.00 Qty Item# Description (5) VSBSCSVC-04 Vigilant LPR Basic Service Package for Hosted/Managed LPR Deployments • Managed/hosted server account services by Vigilant o Includes access to all LEARN or Client Portal and CarDetector software updates • Priced per camera per year for over 60 total camera units • Requires new/existing Enterprise Service Agreement(ESA) Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $8,750.00 Qty Item# Description (7) CDFS-4HWW Fixed Camera LPR System - Extended Hardware Warranty -Year 2 through 5 • Fixed LPR System LPR hardware component replacement warranty • Applies to 1-Channel hardware system kit • Valid for 4 years from standard warranty expiration Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $14,700.00 Qty Item# Description (7) SSU-SYS-COM Vigilant System Start Up & Commissioning of'In Field' LPR system • Vigilant technician to visit customer site • Includes system start up, configuration and commissioning of LPR system • Applies to mobile (1 System)and fixed (1 Camera)LPR systems Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $3,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) VS-TRVL-01 Vigilant Travel via Client Site Visit • Vigilant certified technician to visit client site • Includes all travel costs for onsite support services Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $500.00 Page 155 Page 3 of 4 Qty Item# Description (7) VS-SHP-02 Vigilant Shipping Charges Applies to each fixed camera LPR System Shipping Method is FOB Shipping Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $385.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Install Installation of 7 Fixed Cameras Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $21,150.00 Qty Item# Description (1) Sales Tax 7.75% Sales Tax on Hardware Subtotal Price(Excluding sales tax) $5,296.59 Quote Notes: 1. All prices are quoted in USD and will remain firm and in effect for 60 days. 2. Returns or exchanges will incur a 15% restocking fee. 3. Orders requiring immediate shipment may be subject to a 15% QuickShip fee. Quoted by: Nickolas Kister-925-366-1345 - nickolas.kister@vigilantsolutions.com Total Price(Excluding sales tax) $122,274.59 City of Rancho Cucamonga By: Name Date Title Page 156 Page 4 of 4 AMENDMENT NO. 8 to Professional Services Agreement(CO#15-048) between Vigilant Solutions LLC (hereinafter"Vigilant Solutions LLC") and City of Rancho Cucamonga(hereinafter the"City") This Amendment No. 8 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 15-048,to incorporate the following: To add scope of services for fixed LPR at East and South bound Day Creek/ Foothill Blvd, East Avenue/ Victoria Street, Fourth St/ Etiwanda Avenue and 8th Street/ Vineyard Ave in the amount of$449,000.00. An additional $10,000 per location is being added as contingency funds, bringing the total for the projects to $489,000.00. All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#15-048,will remain in full effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than June 1st, 2021. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Vigilant Solutions LLC with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment. Vi i n 1 i L City of Rancho Cucamonga By 26/2021 By: ate Name Date Director of Sales Title ro, 1Pa%1ANm1wffff= Title By: 4/26/2021 By: Date Name Date Regional Sales Manager Title Title (two signatures required if corporation) Attachment 5 Last Revised: 0912812012 Page I of I Page 157 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Ivan Rojer, Fire Chief Joseph Ramos, Emergency Management Coordinator SUBJECT: Consideration to Continue the Existing Local Emergency Due to the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review and continue the need for the existing local emergency due to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. BACKGROUND: On January 31, 2020, the Department of Health and Human Services declared the COVID-19 outbreak a public health emergency for the United States. The state of California followed this public emergency, and the Governor declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, and the President declared a national emergency on March 13, 2020. Subsequently, the San Bernardino County Department of Public Health declared a public health emergency on March 10, 2020. All three levels of government continue to keep their emergency status open due to the pandemic. On March 18, 2020, pursuant to the California Emergency Services Act (Government Code Section 8550 et seq.), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga proclaimed a local emergency by way of Resolution 2020-014. On May 6, July 15, September 16, November 18 of 2020, and March 17 and May 5 of 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed the need to continue existence of the local emergency and agreed to extend for an additional 60 days. ANALYSIS: Government Code Section 8630 requires the City Council to review the need for continuing the local emergency every 60 days until the governing body terminates the emergency. Since the last review, City staff has regularly updated City Council on public health, economic and social issues arising out of the COVID-19 pandemic. On June 15, 2021, the state of California moved to Beyond the Blueprint for a Safer Economy which allows for the removal of personal safety requirements, including social distancing and wearing a facial covering for most scenarios involving vaccinated individuals. However, the County, State, and Federal government have kept their emergency declarations open in order to continue to respond to and recover from the pandemic. Page 158 Given that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to affect the region and the City, there remains a need to keep the emergency declaration in place. This will allow the City to, among other things, continue assisting residents and businesses affected by these various State and County orders and to effectively respond to emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Staff recommends keeping the local emergency in place as long as the County, State, and Federal government continue to keep their emergency status current. FISCAL IMPACT: The budgetary impact is unknown. Emergency operations, response and recovery efforts continue to consume a significant amount of staff time. Various revenue sources, including sales tax and transient occupancy tax (TOT) along with multiple City fees, have been significantly reduced. The City will have to expend funds in the General Fund, and potentially reserves, to combat COVID-19 and continue operations during this crisis. However, maintaining the local emergency does not, in and of itself, result in a fiscal impact of the City. The emergency declaration may allow the City to seek reimbursements for certain emergency protective measures incurred in responding to the pandemic. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: By keeping the need for the local emergency and actively recovering eligible state and federal emergency expenses, we are ensuring our community continues its efforts to be sustainable and maintain a safe, healthy, and high quality of life for all residents. ATTACHMENTS: None Page 2 Page 159 A h 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Trina Valdez, Utilities Operations Supervisor SUBJECT: Consideration of Amendment No. 01 to Managed Services Agreement with Advanced Utility Systems (CO18-087) for the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility CIS Infinity Software Billing Platform. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize Amendment No. 01 for the renewal of Managed Services Agreement (CO18-087) with Advanced Utility Systems, in the amount of $42,568 for Fiscal Year 2021/22. BACKGROUND: In 2018, the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Advanced Utility Systems entered into a three-year Managed Services Agreement (CO18-087) to provide regression testing on a regular basis to keep the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU) billing software up to date with the current version and security updates. This service also provides regular reports on system maintenance, quarterly review of upcoming build logs, implementing new enhancements and an annual Business Process Review. ANALYSIS: Over the past three years, the Advanced Utility Services staff along with RCMU staff have been able to complete testing and update the software with fourteen builds that provided enhancements, bug fixes and development items. This service has greatly reduced the time RCMU staff normally would have spent testing each process and function to verify the software update would work properly before implementing into the production environment. In addition to the testing, staff completed a Business Process Review that provided useful feedback and ideas to better streamline certain processes to make them more efficient. Given the positive results over the past three years, it is recommended that the City continue utilizing Advanced Utility Systems services to keep the RCMU CIS Infinity billing software current and secure. A copy of Amendment No. 01 is available in the City Clerk's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) in the amount of$42,568 is included in Account 1705303-5309 of the Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget. Page 160 COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future as improvements to the software increase the security and resiliency of digital information. ATTACHMENTS: None. Page 2 Page 161 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Noah Daniels, Deputy Director of Finance SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to Initiate Proceedings to Levy Annual Assessments; Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; and Declaring the City Council's Intention to Levy Annual Assessments Within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, and 10; Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2021/22; and Setting the Time and Place for a Public Hearing Thereon. (RESOLUTION NO'S. 2021-053, 2021-054, 2021-055, 2021-056, 2021- 057, 2021-058, 2021-059, 2021-060 AND 2021-061) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt resolutions ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports to initiate the proceedings to levy annual assessments; approving the preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; declaring the City Council's intention to levy annual assessments within Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9, and 10; Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8; and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 for Fiscal Year 2021/22; and setting a public hearing for July 21, 2021. BACKGROUND: The City of Rancho Cucamonga administers multiple Landscape Maintenance Districts and Street Lighting Districts, and one Park and Recreation District (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"), including setting the assessment rates paid by property owners within each District. Property owners pay these annual assessments through their property tax bills, and the revenues provide for the maintenance and operations of parks, landscaping, and street lights within their communities. To set the assessment rates each year, the City Council levies the assessment and reconfirms the Districts by a series of resolutions and a public hearing. The process, which is set by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), includes the following steps: 1. City Council adopts a resolution ordering the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Report 2. City Council accepts the preliminary Annual Engineer's Report 3. City Council adopts a resolution of intention and sets the time and place for a public hearing Page162 4. City Council conducts a public hearing and then adopts a resolution confirming the District and levying the assessments for the upcoming fiscal year The 1972 Act requires the City Council to accept the preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports at this time; however, approval is not final until after the City Council conducts a public hearing. The Resolutions of Intention set a required public hearing for July 21, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. After the public hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as recommended. Upon final adoption, the Districts will be reconfirmed for Fiscal Year 2021/22, and the assessment amounts will be posted to the County of San Bernardino tax rolls before the deadline in August. These assessments will appear as a separate item on the property tax bill for each parcel. Additionally, the recommended rates were developed during the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget process and are included in the budgeted revenues for each District. ANALYSIS: Each District has specific and unique improvements based on its boundaries and the community. Additionally, in order to comply with state law, each District's assessment rate cannot exceed its maximum allowable assessment rate. On an annual basis, City staff performs a financial analysis for each District to determine the recommended rates to the City Council that meet the current operations and future capital replacement needs for each District. Based on the analysis performed, City staff recommends no changes to the assessment rates in Districts LIVID 2, LIVID 3B, LIVID 4-R, LIVID 5, and SLD 8. For those Districts, City staff has determined that the current assessment rate is sufficient to meet the operational needs of the District. For Districts LIVID 1, LIVID 7, LIVID 8, SLDs 1 through 7, and PD-85, due to state law, the assessment rate is already at the maximum allowable assessment rate and cannot be increased without voter approval. In those cases, City staff has analyzed the operations of each District and reduced costs where feasible to be in line with the assessment revenues. When a reduction was not possible and an operating deficit existed, a General Benefit Equivalent Contribution from the General Fund has been budgeted. Assessment rate increases are recommended for the following Districts: • LIVID 6-R Caryn Community: An increase of 2.25% to the maximum assessment rate from $451.92 to $462.07 per single family residence is necessary for operations of the District. During our rate analysis, the budgeted expenditures exceeded budgeted revenues, including the General Benefit Equivalent Contribution from the General Fund, by $68,270, indicating the need for a rate adjustment. Capital expenditures include the installation of drought-tolerant landscaping, which will decrease water usage and reduce operating expenditures or help mitigate water rate increases in future fiscal years. • LIVID 10 Rancho Etiwanda: An increase from $758.72 to $781.48 per single family residence, or 3%, is recommended. Even with this assessment rate increase, the budgeted expenditures exceed budgeted revenues by $181,990. To address this deficit, City staff recommends that the assessment rate be increased in small increments over time, slowly reducing the need for the use of fund balance. The recommended assessment rate is still well below the maximum allowable assessment rate of $992.03 per single family residence. Page 2 Page 163 An assessment rate decrease is recommended for the following District: • LMD 9 Lower Etiwanda: A decrease of the assessment rate from $436.69 to $311.92 per single family residence is recommended. The last few fiscal years, City staff recommended several increases to the assessment rate anticipating a significant capital project for sports field lighting at Garcia Park. This capital project has been placed on hold to be reevaluated by City staff with input from the community. Detailed information for the Districts is contained in the specific preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports attached to this staff report. Below is a summary of the maximum and recommended assessment rates for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Current New Maximum District Assessment Assessment Assessment Notes LMD 1 $92.21 $92.21 $92.21 Rate increase would (General City) require voter approval. LMD 2 $503.80 $503.80 $546.45 No change (Victoria recommended. Neighborhood Parks LMD 3B $282.24 $282.24 $352.80 No change (Commercial recommended. Industrial LMD 4-R $397.15 $397.15 $482.44 No change (Terra Vista Planned recommended. Community) LMD 5 $56.65 $56.65 $113.29 No change (Andover) recommended. LMD 6-R $451.92 $462.07 $462.07 2.25% increase to (Caryn Planned reflect an increase in Community) operational costs. LMD 7 $307.05 $307.05 $307.05 Rate increase would (North Etiwanda) require voter approval. LMD 8 $151.45 $151.45 $151.45 Rate increase would (South Etiwanda) require voter approval. LMD 9 $436.69 $311.92 $644.67 40% decrease, (Lower Etiwanda) sufficient revenues are available to meet financial obligations. LMD 10 $758.72 $781.48 $992.03 3% increase to reflect (Rancho Etiwanda) an increase in operational costs. SLD 1 $17.77 $17.77 $17.77 Rate increase would (Arterials) require voter approval. SLD 2 $39.97 $39.97 $39.97 Rate increase would (Local Streets) require voter approval. SLD 3 $47.15 $47.15 $47.15 Rate increase would (Victoria Planned require voter approval. Page 3 Page164 Current New Maximum District Assessment Assessment Assessment Notes Community) SLD 4 $28.96 $28.96 $28.96 Rate increase would (Terra Vista Planned require voter approval. Community) SLD 5 $34.60 $34.60 $34.60 Rate increase would (Caryn Planned require voter approval. Community) SLD 6 $51.40 $51.40 $51.40 Rate increase would (Commercial require voter approval. Industrial SLD 7 $33.32 $33.32 $33.32 Rate increase would (North Etiwanda) require voter approval. SLD 8 $30.60 $30.60 $193.75 No change (South Etiwanda) recommended. PD-85 $31.00 $31.00 $31.00 Rate increase would (Red Hill and Heritage require voter approval. Parks Lastly, when the Districts were established, they were created in conjunction with new development coming into the City and were intended to bear the costs of the improvements that provide a special benefit to the property owners. However, due to state law restrictions as previously discussed, some Districts are unable to increase the assessment rate without voter approval and have long-term fiscal sustainability issues that will need to be addressed in future years. Those Districts might receive "General Benefit Equivalent" contributions from the City's General Fund, which are authorized by the City Council to support a District that is operating at a deficit, lacks the resources for necessary maintenance, or has insufficient operating reserves. Per City policy, the amount of the General Benefit Equivalent will not exceed 11% of the adjusted total budget. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the following Districts are budgeted to receive General Benefit Equivalent contributions: • $36,610 for LMD 1 General City • $40,090 for LMD 6-R Caryn Planned Community • $63,610 for SLD 2 Local Streets • $28,920 for SLD 5 Caryn Planned Community • $29,400 for SLD 7 North Etiwanda • $99,990 for PD-85 ($26,260 for operations of Red Hill and Heritage Parks and $73,730 for the Red Hill Water Feature) Another type of contribution from the General Fund is a "General Benefit Contribution," which is required by law and quantifies the dollar value of a general benefit provided to the community at large by the District. For Fiscal Year 2021/22, LMD 2 Victoria Neighborhood Parks is budgeted to receive $303,270 in General Benefit Contribution in accordance with the voter-approved measure. Page 4 Page 165 FISCAL IMPACT: The Districts are separate from the City General Fund. Assessment revenues collected for each District are used for the maintenance and operations for only that District. The estimated costs of administration, maintenance and operations, and capital improvements in the Districts are described in the Annual Engineer's Report prepared for each District. As noted previously, certain Districts receive some support from the City General Fund due to either legal requirements (General Benefit Contribution) or due to City policy (General Benefit Equivalent). These amounts are detailed within the staff report. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This item addresses the City Council's core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future by complying with reporting requirements for assessment revenues that defray the cost of services and public facilities related to the Districts. Additionally, by adopting the resolutions setting a public hearing for July 21, 2021, the City Council is actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input by allowing the public an opportunity to participate in the decision- making process for the financial sustainability of the Districts. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 1 Attachment 2 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 2 Attachment 3 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 3B Attachment 4 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 4-R Attachment 5 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 5 Attachment 6 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 6-R Attachment 7 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 7 Attachment 8 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 8 Attachment 9 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 9 Attachment 10 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 10 Attachment 11 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 1 Attachment 12 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 2 Attachment 13 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 3 Attachment 14 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 4 Attachment 15 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 5 Attachment 16 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 6 Attachment 17 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 7 Attachment 18 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 8 Attachment 19 - Preliminary Engineer's Report PD-85 Attachment 20 - Resolution LMD Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 21 - Resolution LMD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 22 - Resolution LMD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 23 - Resolution SLD Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 24 - Resolution SLD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 25 - Resolution SLD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 26 - Resolution PD-85 Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 27 - Resolution PD-85 Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 28 - Resolution PD-85 Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Page 5 Page 166 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) Page 167 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (GENERAL CITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 168 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 20 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 21 District Budget 22 Definitions of Budget Items 24 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 25 Overview 25 General Benefit 26 Special Benefit 26 Method of Assessment Spread 27 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 28 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 30 Assessment Roll 30 Annexations 30 Page 169 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 45,240 Operations and Maintenance 1,335,760 Capital Expenditures 198,920 Transfer Out 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget 1,669,920 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,238,160 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220 Subtotal - Taxes 1,250,380 Other Revenues 60,820 Transfer In 160,990 Total Revenues Budget 1,472,190 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (197,730) Total District EBU Count 13,562.67 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 92.21 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 170 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 171 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page172 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other landscape maintenance districts within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 173 replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park. Site # Descriptive Location A-1 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from Hellman Ave to Amethyst Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet A-2 The east side of Hellman Ave from 326 feet south of Pepperidge Ln to 73 feet north of Pepperidge Ln. Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet A-3 The south side of 19th St from 62 feet east of Mayberry Ave to 173 feet east of Mayberry Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet Hardscape area: 440 square feet A-4 The south side of Wilson Ave from Amethyst Ave to Archibald Ave; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald Ave from Wilson Ave to 105 feet south of Cottonwood Way. Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Ave from Klusman Ave to Diamond Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon Way to Alder Ridge PI. Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 174 A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata Pl. Ground Cover area: 911 square feet A-8 The east side of Broken Star Ct from 80 feet south of Highland Ave to Highland Ave; the north side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to Broken Star Ct including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland Ave from Broken Star Ct to Amethyst Ave; the west side of Amethyst Ave from 140 feet south of Highland Ave to 265 feet south of Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet A-9 The south side of Highland Ave from Hellman Ave to Broken Star Ct. Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet A-10 The south side of 19th St from 170 feet west of Pilgrim Ct to 167 feet east of Pilgrim Ct. Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet A-11 The east side of Amethyst Ave from Lemon Ave to 230 feet north of Apricot Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet A-12 The west side of Sapphire St from 710 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet A-13 The south side of Victoria St from 110 feet west of London Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet A-14 The west side of Archibald Ave from 273 feet north of La Gloria Dr to Lemon Ave; the La Gloria Dr median from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave; the north and south side of La Gloria Dr from Archibald Ave to 53 feet east of Jadeite Ave; the north side of Lemon Ave from Archibald Ave to 55 feet east of Klusman Ave. Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 175 A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald Ave from 610 feet south of Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave; the south side of Wilson Ave from Archibald Ave to Alta Loma Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 190 feet north of Sunflower St. Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald Ave from 225 feet south of Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan St from Jadeite Ave to 410 feet west of Jadeite Ave. Ground Cover area: 216 square feet A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst Ave from 192 feet south of Sunflower St to Manzanita Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet A-20 The west side of Archibald Ave from 210 feet north of La Colina Dr to 230 feet south of Almond St; the south side of La Colina Dr from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave. Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood PI to Raspberry PI north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College. Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet A-22 The west side of Haven Ave from Carrari St to Vista Grove St. Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet A-23 The west side of Haven Ave from 434 feet north of Manzanita Dr to 258 feet south of Manzanita Dr. Ground Cover area: 54,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet A-24 The south side of 19th St from 286 feet east of Amethyst Ave to 166 feet west of Klusman Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 176 A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa Ave from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest Dr to Sun Valley Dr. Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet A-26 The west side of Haven Ave from 630 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave; the parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from Haven Ave to Mayberry Ave; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry Ave from Wilson Ave to 382 feet north of Poplar St, and the east and west side of Cartilla Ave from Wilson Ave to Poplar St. Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet A-27 The north side of 19th St from Mayberry Ave to 93 feet east of Castle Gate PI. Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet A-28 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 360 feet south of Manzanita Dr to Manzanita Dr, and the south side of Manzanita Dr from Hermosa Ave to Raspberry PI. Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet A-29 The south side of Wilson Ave from 240 feet west of Timbermist PI to Hermosa Ave; the west side of Hermosa Ave from Wilson Ave to 213 feet south of Oakgrove Dr. Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet A-30 Site was removed from contract and water service cancelled January 1, 2017. A-31 The south side of Lemon Ave from London Ave to Calle Hermoso. Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet A-32 The north side of Lemon Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to London Ave; the east side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Cypress Ct. Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet A-33 The parkway on the east side of London Ave from 158 feet north of Banyan St to 310 feet north of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 177 A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr from Mayberry Ave to Revere Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet A-35 The west side of Hermosa Ave from Lemon Ave to 125 feet north of Highland Ave, the parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 621 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet A-36 The south side of Lemon Ave from 385 feet west of Mayberry Ave to Cartilla Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet A-37 The south side of Hillside Rd north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl St to 203 feet east of Eastwood Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista St. Ground Cover area: 500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet A-39 The south side of Almond St from Henry St to Sapphire St. The west side of Sapphire St from Almond St to 255 feet south of Bella Vista Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The parkway on the south side of Highland Ave from Jasper St to Carnelian St. The west side of Carnelian St from Highland Ave to 210 feet south of Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet A-41 The west side of Sapphire St from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred St to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet Hardscape area: 812 square feet A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 132 feet north of Sunflower St to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 178 A-43 The north side of Base Line Rd from Topaz St to the Cucamonga Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire St from Banyan St to Marble Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 on September 8, 1999. A-46 The south side of Banyan St from Northstar PI to Zircon Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan St from 180 feet east of Zircon Ave to 186 feet west of Vineyard Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 452 feet north of Cielito St; 158 feet south of Cielito St and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito St from Cielito St to 170 feet south of Cielito St. Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet A-49 The east side of Carnelian St from 662 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St; the south side of Banyan St from Carnelian St to Northstar Pl. Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet A-50 The north side of Almond St from Sapphire St to Crestview PI; the east and west side of Skyline Rd from Almond St to 595 feet north of Almond St. Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven Ave to Riverwood PI, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven Ave from 400 feet north of Amber Ln to 270 feet south of Amber Ln, and the north and south side of Amber Ln from Haven Ave to San Felipe Ct. Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 179 A-52 The east side of Riverwood PI, from 188 feet south of Charwood Ct to 193 feet north of Charwood Ct. Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-53 The west side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland from Jasper St to 308 feet west of Sard St. The east and west side of Sard St from Highland Ave to Hunter Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet A-54 The west side of Beryl St from 233 feet north of Mignonette St to Mignonette St. Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet Hardscape area: 932 square feet A-55 The north side of 19th St from Cartilla Ave to Mayberry Ave. The east side of Mayberry Ave from 19th St to Heather St. Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet A-56 The east side of Beryl St from 410 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 731 feet west of Buckthorn Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Buckthorn Ave to Beryl St. Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet A-57 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 115 feet north of Coca St to 451 feet north of Coca St. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa Ave to 619 feet east of Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet A-58 The west side of Haven Ave from 510 feet south of Victoria St to 1005 feet south of Victoria St. Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet A-59 The east side of Archibald Ave from 820 feet south of Lemon Ave to 448 feet south of Lemon Ave and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon Ave to 185 south of Lemon Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 180 A-60 The south side of Lemon Ave from 290 feet east of Archibald Ave to London Ave. The west side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Orange St. Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet A-61 The north side of Carrari St from London Ave to Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet A-62 The east side of Archibald Ave from Carrari St to 505 feet north of Meadowood Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet A-63 The south side of Almond St from Carriage Rd to Almond St. Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet A-64 The east side of Beryl St from Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 437 feet east of Beryl St. The north side of Wilson Ave from Cousins PI to 474 feet east of Cousins PI. Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet A-65 The east side of Archibald Ave from La Gloria Dr to 328 feet north of La Gloria Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet A-66 The east side of Hermosa Ave from Waterford Ln to 500 feet north of Waterford Ln. Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet A-67 The south side of 19th St from 220 feet east of Sapphire St to Via Serena. Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet A-68 The west side of Haven Ave from Hillside Rd to 783 feet south of Hillside Rd. Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet A-69 The north side of Hillside Rd from 27 feet west of Mayberry Ave to 191 feet west of Mayberry Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 181 A-70 The south side of 19th St from 365 feet west of Amethyst Ave to Amethyst Ave. The west side of Amethyst Ave from 19th to Hedges Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet A-71 The west side of Archibald Ave from Hillside Rd to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave, south of the trail fence area from Archibald Ave to 467 feet west of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet A-72 The south side of Banyan St from 420 feet west of Archibald Ave to Archibald Ave. The west side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 389 feet south of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet Hardscape area: 600 square feet A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave. Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet A-76 The west side of Archibald Ave from 635 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. The north side of Hillside Rd from Archibald Ave to 770 feet west of Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet A-77 The east side of Carnelian St from Brilliant Ln to Wilson Ave including the irrigation cut- outs along trail. The south side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet B-1 The median on Blue Gum Dr from Etiwanda Ave to Blue Gum Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 182 B-2 The north side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito Ave. The north side of 19th St from San Benito Ave to Palm Dr. The west and east side of Alameda Ave from 19th St to Ring Ave. The east side of Palm Dr from 19th St to Ring Ave. Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 294 square feet Hardscape area: 400 square feet B-4 The north side of Banyan St from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet B-5 The north side of Lemon Ave from Semillion PI to 188 feet west of Terracina Ave. Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet B-6 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac PI to Semillion Pl. Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet B-7 The south side of Banyan St from Cabernet PI to 414 feet east of Cabernet PI. Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet B-8 The south side of Banyan St from Callaway PI to Muscat PI. Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet B-9 The east side of Haven Ave from Banyan St to 240 feet north of Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Merlot Ct. Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet B-10 The east side of Haven Ave from 400 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Callaway Pl. Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet B-11 The south side of Banyan St from Muscat PI to Cabernet PI. Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page183 B-12 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac PI to 135 feet east of Valinda Ave. Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet B-13 The south side of 19th St from Inyo PI to 585 feet east of San Benito Ave. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito Ave from 19th St to San Mateo PI. The east side of Inyo PI from 19th St to paseo south of 19th St and the paseo running east from Inyo PI to Sonora Ave. Ground Cover area: 20,950 square feet Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet B-14 The paseo from San Benito Ave and Sonora Ave to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet Hardscape area: 540 square feet B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus PI and La Vine St to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet Hardscape area: 428 square feet B-16 The paseo from Inyo PI to Mendocino Pl. Ground Cover area: 225 square feet Hardscape area: 184 square feet B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 918 square feet Hardscape area: 420 square feet B-18 The south side of Wilson Ave from 377 feet west of Canistel Ave to 1032 feet east of Canistel Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet B-19 The east side of Haven Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria St. Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet B-20 The east side of Haven Ave from 341 feet south of Victoria St to Victoria St; the south side of Victoria St from Haven Ave to 237 feet east of Mango St. Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page184 B-21 The south side of 19th St from Valinda Ave to Inyo PI. Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet B-22 The south side of Lemon Ave south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 284 feet north of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 517 feet north of Marbella Dr. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Ct. The parkway on the north side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The north side of Lemon Ave north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena PI. Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet Turf area: 6,390 square feet Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon Ave from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The slope on the east side of Lemon Ave east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The west side of Lemon Ave west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the west side of Lemon Ave from 517 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet B-24 The south side of Highland Ave from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos Way to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet B-25 The south side of Banyan St from 152 feet west of Cantabria Ave to 930 feet east of Cantabria Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet B-26 The north side of Wilson Ave from 590 feet west of High Meadow PI to 187 feet east of High Meadow PI. Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet Hardscape area: 390 square feet B-27 The east side of Haven Ave from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St. Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 185 C-1 The north side of 26th St from Andover PI to Hermosa Ave. The east side of Hermosa Ave from 26th St to 331 feet north of Concord Dr. Ground Cover area: 22,227 square feet Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th St and Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet C-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ramona Ave to 128 feet east of Cambridge Ave. Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet C-4 The south side of Base Line Rd from 440 feet west of Ramona Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet C-5 The south side of Base Line Rd from 340 feet west of Center Ave to 103 feet east of Center Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet C-6 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ivy Ln to 105 feet west of Marine Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church St from 142 feet east of Teak Way to 230 feet west of Teak Way. Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet C-8 The west side of Hermosa Ave from 524 feet north of Palo Alto St to 142 feet south of Palo Alto St. Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa Ave from 163 feet north of Ironwood St to 145 feet south of Ironwood St. Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page186 C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line Rd from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl St from Alder St to 135 feet north of Culpepper St. Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman Ave from Tryon St to 665 feet north of Tryon St. Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman Ave from 500 feet north of Church St to Church St. Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet C-14 The east side of Archibald Ave from 196 feet north of Palo Alto St to 530 feet north of Palo Alto St. Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet C-15 The north side of San Bernardino Rd from Summerlin PI to 225 feet west of Summerlin PI. Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet Hardscape area: 710 square feet C-16 The south side of Base Line Rd from 286 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave. The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line Rd and Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet C-17 The east side of Hellman Ave from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman Ave to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 187 D-1 The east side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 27,920 square feet Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet D-2 The east side of Rochester Ave from 146 feet south of Chervil St to Church St. Ground Cover area: 21,858 square feet Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet D-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet D-4 The north and south sides of Church St from Rochester Ave to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet D-5 The landscape along the Edison corridor from Arrow Rt. To Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 23,392 square feet H-9 The Haven Ave median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet H-10 The Haven Ave median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Ln. Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet Converted 5,131 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-11 The Haven Ave median from Amber Ln to Olive Way. Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet Converted 3,475 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-12 The Haven Ave median from Olive Way to 712 feet north of Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet Converted 3,933 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013 H-13 The Haven Ave median from 19th St to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 188 FH-18 The Foothill Blvd median from East Ave to 453 feet east of Cornwall Ct. Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 189 TI r �• v D v Q- (1) City of Rancho Cucamonga � 0 L < a' , v Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 N �"dH° � Irrigation Sites o N � � ���wF,/N/F.�ir�l�rw+wrra�r .�r��F�w.«.i�l�l, ■I.I rlri.rr�r.l.rrl■ICI rl�l`Ir�rr1! , nd2 aas j 1 m N (D Hillside RdA'� t i` A3] Alf'r, h�Ahf Ae ■ Wilson7- p1V' uF • iA1a �ITBanyan St Z —�sA40 A3f 9 � , 19th St �\ SJl A� A2�7�Ibl A 91bJ } } �t/J `A ■ A33 T Q *A4% 91A �13 O v —h Mj Base Line Rd U< CSCG� o= /;,&FcPothill ine Rd MIIC..C...prk n { O Foothill BI U Bi 0 v ! �� ± Arrow Rt Arrow Rt 8th St > .�.y fa6tl7 5 U) 1 D I W Legend > 4th St} _ 4th St LMD 1 Water Meters D The .data,aid p—W phk Horvr - l/ tl-Oa d Palo Cum—W am p—1 an a pd-2zux d g—Mummlon. LMD 1 Irrigation Pumps �= ihedRandio Cumnvge oalxsranm.orrarrtxrt or puamrtxe rcl C f0 p > � +•, 4C+ to via �n+ot axrar.c rangy. Idorrr . C -0 m v-h— Tm——d e,"w——id—N.., <a>v — -E LMD 1 Irrigation Lines and u dre.d m Ir kpawcnA—,t erry..all Irlvvratnn p—laer� L.l m Trc CIy d paid.C Q.opW.Uv xd,*U n 11�m dlffil erry.a M = = u N �z A d.m ate. IMLtr� b.——.!d. d.�kd rasa ee LMD 1 (.0--i d mard,—Jny xd lltrz,a fora parnaaar preox fhm dry of P— O r ,pa ■■■q shall rehire�mr asne ar«�adtK,ieya�es d the carmtbn fn SQ¢*! '�4'1ilY$ �aaa . Ina a�A�aed�,saa j ` City Limits r �a�. ap�amaM �m��dem a�a� 1 � C.7= u 1 `I r. O N ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 18,050 Part-time Salaries 14,350 Fringe Benefits 12,840 Subtotal- Personnel 45,240 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 77,070 O & M/Facilities 2,300 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 2,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 5,800 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 2,000 Subtotal-Operations and Maintenance 89,170 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 645,960 Contract Services/Facilities 7,410 Tree Maintenance 52,500 Subtotal-Contract Services 705,870 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 1,890 Water Utilities 380,530 Electric Utilities 37,450 Subtotal- Utilities 419,870 Assessment Administration 62,850 Admin./General Overhead 57,340 Other Expenses 660 Subtotal-Operations and Maintenance 1,335,760 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Equipment 8,920 Captial Outlay- Improvements Other Than Building 90,000 Captial Project 100,000 Subtotal-Capital Expenditures 198,920 Transfer Out: Transfer Out- LMD#1 Capital Reserve Fund 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,669,920 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 191 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,238,160 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220 Subtotal -Taxes 1,250,380 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 19,560 Other Rental/Lease Income 28,270 Park Maintenance Fees 3,050 Sports Field User Group Rentals 110 Sports Lighting Fees 9,730 Other Revenue 100 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 60,820 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 36,610 Transfer In - LIVID #1 Operating Fund 90,000 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 34,380 Subtotal -Transfer In: 160,990 Total Revenues Budget 1,472,190 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (197,730) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,250,665.21 Total District EBU Count 13,562.67 Actual Assessment per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 92.21 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 92.21 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17 the City will maintain a Capital Reserve Fund to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 192 Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $1,296,936 $412,049 $1,708,984 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (110,480) (87,250) (197,730) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $1,186,456 $324,799 $1,511,254 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 193 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 194 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas, Parks - Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the General City and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the General City which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 195 • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 196 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Assessment Total Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,395.00 8,404.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,282.00 5,141.00 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 1 8.83 1 17.67 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #01 Page 197 -n r �• v D City of Rancho Cucamonga m � 0 � Y 9 NMI z � 9) Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 CD RANCHO - � Y N CUCAMoNCk Mimi _ W _ (General City) O 5• ; ■uI�1�1�1�1�1�1■I�u u�M. IMF u1�1� ruut�l�lr�■ �1■I�u�������r�r.r.�l■I�i�u 1 N (D ii ■ ■ { O o Hillside Rd ! ■ '� L � CD i m 3 !Wilson Av in ii 8 ■ i - 90 0 Banyan St i I 14th St O L Base Line Rd .. U ■ Base Line Rd n r``1 = i O n ■ Foothill BI Foothill BI v � 3 ■ O Arrow Rt G ■ Arrow Rt cQ ■ v � i Sth Sty ■ D �Gth S ; ca s i Legend > > 4th StTil 4th St 11MI no D �}i-r•�ih�s+} � } 7 �+++� } �-�r City Limits fil d tuba 6ak.ual H ad.+rr a a Wes.rb.+of.wr e+naasx CD Maw r d.me m reprr.,y�k+tee w r wam.er�p �r..u. rC fE �� d w w. .a�.ada,.•ego-d Ancaw = L 4} V Miles .xr;nmuen o-win n.n a,Ywn Luc+.w 06.x rim o- o ry e.. ..,. .e ... 1 0.5 0 1 � (.0 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Units/ Property Type (County Use Code) Rate Per EBU Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $92.21 8,395.00 8,404.00 $774,932.84 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 10,282.00 5,141.00 474,103.02 Non-Residential 1 92.21 8.83 17.67 1,629.35 Total 1 1 18,685.83 13,562.67 $1,250,665.21 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total APN Date Project Name Units/Acres Total EBUS Property Type 1061-261-01 04/16/20 SUBTT20042 26.00 26.00 SFD 1076-151-35 07/16/20 PMT2020-01021 1.00 1.00 SFD 0201-902-16 12/02/20 SUBTPM20098 1.00 1.00 SFD 0208-931-05 1 12/16/20 1 PMT2020-01934 1.00 1 1.00 1 SFD Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#01 Page 199 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) Page 200 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 201 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 22 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 24 District Budget 24 Definitions of Budget Items 26 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION 27 Benefits from Improvements 27 Quantification of Benefit 29 Sidewalks and Community Trails 30 Street Landscaping 32 Neighborhood Parks 37 Collective General Benefit 39 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 39 Overview 39 Apportioning of Special Benefit 40 Rate per Benefit Unit 47 Method of Assessment Spread 47 Applying the Method of Assessment Spread 47 Page 202 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates 50 Cost of Living Inflator 50 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 51 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 53 Assessment Roll 53 Annexations 53 Page 203 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) (hereafter, referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 964,340 Operations and Maintenance 2,996,180 Capital Expenditures 1,027,230 Total Expenditures Budget 4,987,750 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 3,697,410 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410 Subtotal -Taxes 3,724,820 Other Revenues 48,920 Transfer In 303,270 Total Revenues Budget 4,077,010 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (910,740) Total District EBU Count 81,554.33 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 45.80 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 49.68 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 204 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 205 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 206 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and six neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 207 parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park Site # Descriptive Location 2-1 The west side of Arbor Ln from the traffic circle to Church St. The Arbor Ln median from Church St to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Ln from Long Meadow Dr to Church St. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Saintsbury PI. The north side of Winery Dr from Arbor Ln to 214 feet west of Arbor Ln. The south side of Long Meadow Dr from Freestone Ct to Duck Creek PI. Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet 2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd and Church St. The north side of Church St from Day Creek Blvd to 1,152 feet west of Hess PI. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Pineridge PI. The west side of Hess PI from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The south side of Church St from 145 feet east of Hyssop Dr to 896 feet east of Hyssop Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet 2-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 250 feet north of Appellation Dr to Church St. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Church St to Madrigal PI. The Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Base Line Rd. The south side of Madrigal PI from Day Creek Blvd to Round Hill PI. Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 208 2-4 Victoria Park Ln from Base Line Rd to the east entrance of Victoria Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Base Line Rd. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Ln to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet Turf area: 3,874 square feet Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet 2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Ln and the medians from Mosaic Dr to Church St. Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet 2-6 The north side of Church St from Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The northwest corner of Church St and Arbor Ln. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Wilson Creek Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet 2-7 The north side of Church St from Victoria Park Ln to Arbor Ln. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Church St. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Elk Cove Ct. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Freestone Ct. The northeast corner of Arbor Ln and Church St. Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet 2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda Ave to Silver Rose Ct. The north side of Church St from Etiwanda Ave to Victoria Park Ln. The east side of Iron Horse PI from Church St to Wild Horse PI. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet 2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Ln from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Ln to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet VW-1 Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 209 VW-2 The north side of Base Line Rd 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson PI. The east and west sides of Swanson PI from Base Line Rd to Province St. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson PI and Province St to Atwood St with outlet to Dunmore PI. The paseo from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga St from Powell PI to Dunmore PI. The paseo from Saratoga St to Etiwanda Ave. The south side of Atwood St from Victoria Park Ln to Travis PI. The north side of Atwood St from Walcott PI to Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet Turf area: 73,931 square feet Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet VW-3 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line Rd to the entrance to Victoria Village. Ground Cover area: 27,090 square feet Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet VW-4 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood St. Ground Cover area: 40,937 square feet Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet VW-5 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 285 square feet Hardscape area: 679 square feet VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 266 square feet Hardscape area: 552 square feet VW-8 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct. Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 210 VW-9 The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from Barberry St to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park. Ground Cover area: 40,004 square feet Turf area: 11,779 square feet Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Ln from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from Zinnia Ct to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Ln from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 50,620 square feet Turf area: 11,878 square feet Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. Ground Cover area: 27,053 square feet Turf area: 20,216 square feet Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet VW-12 The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry St from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to North Victoria Windrows Loop. Ground Cover area: 166,249 square feet Turf area: 21,603 square feet Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Snapdragon St. Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet Turf area: 16,476 square feet Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 211 VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugar Gum St from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood PI from Sugar Gum St to Blazing Star Ct. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Silktassel Dr. Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet Turf area: 10,335 square feet Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach PI to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus PI. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locus Ave and following that curb line to Silverberry St. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry St from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry St to Nasturtium Dr. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locus Ave to Pistache St and continuing to Bougainvillea Way. Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet Turf area: 12,207 square feet Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet VW-16 The south side of Highland Ave from 455 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to 534 feet east of Locus Ave. The east and west side of Locus Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus PI east to Bougainvillea Way. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur PI to Locus Ave. Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet Turf area: 23,922 square feet Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16 on January 5, 1999. VW-18 The south side of Highland Ave from 12583 Highland Ave to Rockrose Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet Turf area: 8,515 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 212 VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to Rockrose Ave. The east side of Rockrose Ave from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Rockrose Ave to Etiwanda Ave. The horse trail from Highland Ave and Etiwanda Ave to the Fire Station. Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet Turf area: 32,266 square feet Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Plum Way. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu PI east to the open field. Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by the VW-20 water meter, but it is maintained by City crews. Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet Turf area: 16,411 square feet Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St to Etiwanda Ave and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina Pl. Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet Turf area: 36,461 square feet Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet Mulchscape: 21,071 square feet VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose Ave to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum Way. Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet Turf area: 19,953 square feet Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet VW-23 The west side of Rockrose Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose Ave to Twinspur Pl. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Rosemary Ct. Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet Turf area: 3,452 square feet Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 213 VW-24 The Metropolitan Water District easement from Jasmine Ct and Ironbark Dr to Sweetgum Dr. Ground Cover area: 475 square feet Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet VW-25 The north side of Base Line Rd from 384 feet west of Wanona PI to Etiwanda Ave. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Base Line Rd to Craig Dr. The Base Line Rd median from Swanson PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet Turf area: 3,079 square feet Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet VW-26 The paseo from Grape PI to 630 feet west of Grape PI. Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet VW-27 The south side of Base Line Rd from 251 feet west of Swanson PI to Etiwanda Ave. The Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to Swanson PI. Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover from Highland Ave on the west side of Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 275 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet Turf area: 47,604 square feet Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 214 VG-2 The turf on the east side of York PI from Delaware St to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from York PI and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln west of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Fairmont Way. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 273 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 53,416 square feet Turf area: 49,587 square feet Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Nova Ct continuing on that curb line to York PI and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong PI continuing on that curb line to York PI. The ground cover on the west side of York PI from Fairmont Way to Delaware St and the ground cover on the east side of York PI. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont Way from Emerson St continuing along that curb line to Armstrong PI. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola PI. Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet Turf area: 38,343 square feet Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong PI to Milliken Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave including the paseo to Baylor St. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Armstrong PI. Ground Cover area: 202,163 square feet Turf area: 19,751 square feet Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet VG-5 The paseo from Biola PI to Amarillo St to Delaware St at York PI. Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet Turf area: 44,896 square feet Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 215 VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont Way and extending to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet Turf area: 74,778 square feet Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly St at Fairmont Way and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright PI from Donnelly St to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston St. Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet Turf area: 51,765 square feet Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Ln from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet Turf area: 8,614 square feet Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 197 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 316 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Baltimore Ct. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Vanderbilt PI. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt PI from Baltimore Dr to Brown Dr. The paseo from Vanderbilt PI and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet Turf area: 11,357 square feet Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 216 VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from 197 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from 316 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Kenyon Way to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol PI from Brown Dr to Bethany Dr. The paseo from Capitol PI and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way. Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet Turf area: 11,031 square feet Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken Ave from Base Line Rd to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Base Line Rd from 542 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet Turf area: 17,264 square feet Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from the southeast corner of Milliken Ave and Fairmont Way along the curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont Way from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Fairmont Way (located east of Milliken Ave) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken Ave. The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet Turf area: 36,431 square feet Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Ln to Verona Dr, Verona Dr to Napoli Dr, and Genova Rd to Tivoli Pl. Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet Turf area: 16,344 square feet Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 217 VG-14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line Rd and following the curb line to Kenyon Way. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon Way to Casoli PI. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema PI from Ellena West to Candela Dr. Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet Turf area: 62,999 square feet Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Rd. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena East from Base Line Rd and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Rd. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra Rd from Ellena East to Comiso Way. Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet Turf area: 57,306 square feet Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet VG-16 The paseo from Base Line Rd to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia Dr and Pavola Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet Turf area: 11,529 square feet Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano PI to Martano PI. Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet Turf area: 40,291 square feet Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo Dr to Gandino Dr and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino Dr to Pizolli PI and to Tolentino Dr. Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet Turf area: 17,856 square feet Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 218 VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the southeast corner at Milliken Ave heading east to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to the northeast corner of Milliken Ave and Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the west side of Parma PI from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The Victoria Park Ln median from Milliken Ave to Pandino Ct. The Milliken Ave median from Victoria Park Ln to 440 feet south of Kenyon Way. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way to Victoria Park Ln. Ground Cover area: 96,750 square feet Turf area: 77,461 square feet Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma PI from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to 653 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma PI to 547 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from Fairmont Way to 422 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Rapallo Dr. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Bari Dr. The Victoria Park Ln median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Dr. Ground Cover area: 85,865 square feet Turf area: 41,994 square feet Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 653 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 547 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The Victoria Park Ln median from Portofino Dr to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln north of the sidewalk from Kenyon Way to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 115,144 square feet Turf area: 57,927 square feet Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 219 VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to 409 feet west of Grimaldi Rd. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino Dr from Kenyon Way to Bergano PI. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark Dr from Kenyon Way to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera PI from Lark Dr to Pescara Rd. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi Rd from Kenyon Way to Brindisi Ct. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon Way from Lark Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello Way from Kenyon Way to Landriano PI. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet Turf area: 82,565 square feet Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet VG-24 The north side of Kenyon Way from Autumn Glen Ct to Woodruff PI. The east side of Woodruff PI from Kenyon Way to 403 feet north of Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet Turf area: 5,320 square feet Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet VG-25 The paseo west of Torino Rd from Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440. Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet Turf area: 24,134 square feet Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct to Messina PI. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina PI from the paseo to Treviso Way. Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet Turf area: 1,141 square feet Hardscape area: 3,615 square feet VG-27 The Milliken Ave median from 440 feet south of Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet Turf area: 3,006 square feet Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet VG-28 The east side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 220 VG-29 The north side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont Way, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon Way to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet Turf area: 16,877 square feet Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet VG-30 The south side of Tresenda Dr from Santo PI to Sappada PI. The paseo from Sappada PI to Carano PI. The south side of Montella Dr from Carano PI to Trivento PI. Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet Turf area: 2,462 square feet Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet VG-31 The east side of Brienza PI from Larino Dr to Letini Dr. The west side of Tindari PI from Letini Dr to Larino Dr. The greenbelt on the south side of Marconi PI from Trivento PI to Comiso Way. The east side of Comiso Way from Scalea PI to Santo PI. Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet Turf area: 18,351 square feet Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet VG-32 The north side of Candela Dr from Terni PI to Bettola Pl. Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet Turf area: 8,190 square feet Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 894 square feet Hardscape area: 318 square feet VG-35 The east side of Rochester Ave from 555 feet south of Palmi Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The south side of Victoria Park Ln and median from Rochester Ave to east side of Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet Turf area: 11,150 square feet Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 221 VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet Turf area: 10,500 square feet Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet Hardscape area: 950 square feet VG-38 The east side of Milliken Ave from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The north and south side of Spring Mist Dr from Milliken Ave to Summerstone Ct. The south side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet Turf area: 4,533 square feet Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from Kenyon Way paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken Ave. The Kenyon Way paseo from Victoria Park Ln to Fairwinds Ct. The paseo from Victoria Park Ln to the south west corner of Kenyon Park. Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet Turf area: 13,120 square feet Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet VG-40 The south side of Highland Ave from 413 feet west of Highland Ave paseo to Highland Ave paseo. The east side of Highland Ave paseo from Highland Ave to Kenyon Way. The north side of Kenyon Way from Highland Ave paseo to Autumn Glen Ct. Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet VG-41 The west side of Rochester Ave from 294 feet south of Highland Ave to Lark Dr. The north side of Lark Dr from Rochester Ave to 1230 feet west of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet VG-42 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,314 feet west of Rochester Ave to Rochester Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from Highland Ave to 294 feet south of Highland Ave. The north side of Highland Ave from Rochester Ave to Woodruff Pl. Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 222 VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and the median from Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington PI from Victoria Park Ln to Stratford Dr. Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet Turf area: 7,888 square feet Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 572 feet north of Silverberry St to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry St from Kensington PI to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet VG-45 The west side of Milliken Ave and the Milliken Ave median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon Way. Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet Turf area: 610 square feet Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet VG-46 The Base Line Rd median from 657 feet east of Virginia PI to Rochester Ave. The north side of Base Line Rd from 278 feet east of Virginia PI to Rochester Ave. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester Ave and Base Line Rd to Huntley Dr. The east side of Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to 105 feet north of Shenandoah Dr. Ground Cover area: 35,823 square feet Hardscape area: 23,645 square feet VG-47 The north side of Base Line Rd from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd median from Day Creek Blvd to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd and median from Base Line Rd to Victoria Park Ln. The south side of Victoria Park Ln from Day Creek Blvd to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet Turf area: 3,234 square feet Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 223 VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet Turf area: 3,930 square feet Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet VG-50 The west side of San Carmela Ct from 389 feet north of Base Line Rd to Base Line Rd. The north side of Base Line Rd from Carmela Ct to 264 feet west of Durness PI. Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon Dr to Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet Hardscape area: 969 square feet VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to Kensington PI. The south side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to 111 feet east of Suffolk PI. Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Ln from 296 feet west of Kensington PI to Milliken Ave. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum St. Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet Turf area: 11,070 square feet Hardscape area: 7,720 square feet VG-54 The east side of Rochester Ave from Shenandoah Dr to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven PI to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 224 VG-56 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek Blvd including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk. Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet VG-57 The north side of Highland Ave from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet VG-58 The south side of Kenyon Wy from the Kenyon Park paseo entrance to Lark Dr. The south side of Lark Dr. from 568 feet west of Kenyon Wy to Kenyon Wy. The paseo east of Kenyon Park from Kenyon Wy to the east/west paseo of site VG-23. Ground Cover area: 24,072 square feet Hardscape area: 9,807 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only — may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 225 -n r v Q City of Rancho Cucamonga CD v Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 �' m RANCHO Irrigation Sites N E: CUCAMCW-k O CD N l vcss --- -------vGa2---------,_VG56.�� ---- ------ � 41 IYGdS .VG40T# VwJB�VW19---- J VG25 n �r � nVG27 VG2a !. #VNfi6 _ f" VGG111VG10 f VG26 � Q rf` s 0}1` WG9� WG38 ' V056VG41 .I -� 1—ve ! i r VG26 VG44 #VW15 { l _ Z2 l`G39--�+WG VG45- Z ,� VG2 _ #120 fWG20 1 V036 J`{ '_I �2 VW10 N VG5WG13 ♦ VG2,`�VG22 YG35�— - Ir13 0 26 VG12 VG1 T P f r VG3��,1 # tl �� � I VW14 VG4 veil YG55-._- PE12� G77 VG51 Eid VW24 VWB W+ VG3d. VG33 VG3�P.13 - VG4B • VW5 l VWS VW7 # # --49-- VG54 # - �' V 012 n r((I-G'1lWWd d VG16 VG1S 1 , _VG46 #VGdI i J VW, • V4M2S o Base Lffie Rd - . VW3 — r-= =� 2d� ILVW27 A w ! �� o � . .z_, a� �' 'Vicapria,4r Park II cQ ar I ' 2ar2s _ � '2 z 2f,2_7 Legend g � � ; 1 ■2$ r Imo' ' 1.0 l�1 ■ Irrigation Pumps D �p Water Meters DIrrigation Lines n m-qa,data.are p g.phk r&m "kek:by mn dnoaah _ [_� LM d T= tb Obr d P Phu C �a e m t d m a whit mow-of 9-1 tfxrre . .J++ (Q� a avuAar f� —p-�.. x��.aaa rra..a 1 I '��_y m the ar *n xuane,V,o ktrrres w IrFO s of arty Lfnmanan CD �m aw� —�rw.d, P—��arsram,ra arm= ❑ � ! CityLimits m aad 6 eaeud m remweMN+ fy aal ana Al Jdcmaava Rea,•r�d he en --J ■r��� NZ The Cq d Aarndro C—rga eVraay ara mdarn I nardan darekre arty and al N� -p�-.d--. , m ry-b��n.naf m.the Wom f-.pa d n Miles E5 p� erdanne.q�and reams maaar p� .ne oK d Aando tam- . wa recFW araspC nor assure any aab4lM mpardka d aaa ram br(Q am o N nrQ em pwadedM,Q �, 0.3 0-15 6 I� 0-3 N W x�ran®..rap are many p- lean- pm-hrM1x umeraora a.ai6ae reran ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 582,690 Overtime Salaries 1,090 Part-time Salaries 70,550 Fringe Benefits 310,010 Subtotal - Personnel 964,340 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 83,300 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 5,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 88,500 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,301,810 Tree Maintenance 163,340 Subtotal - Contract Services 1,465,150 Utilities: Water Utilities 952,430 Electric Utilities 47,700 Subtotal - Utilities 1,000,130 Assessment Administration 35,080 Admin./General Overhead 324,160 Interfund Allocation 83,160 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 2,996,180 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Equipment 2,230 Captial Outlay- Improvements Other Than Building 25,000 Captial Projects 1,000,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 1,027,230 Total Expenditures Budget $ 4,987,750 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 227 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 3,697,410 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410 Subtotal -Taxes 3,724,820 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 47,960 Park Maintenance Fees 960 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 48,920 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 303,270 Total Revenues Budget 4,077,010 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (910,740) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 3,734,751.68 Total District EBU Count 81,554.33 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 45.80 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 49.68 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 3,760,724 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (910,740) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 2,849,984 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 228 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 229 BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION Benefits from Improvements The improvements previously defined are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The benefits are described below. Sidewalks and Community Trails People walk for a variety of reasons, whether the reason is to commute to work or school, run errands, shop, leisure activities, fitness, or some other purpose. To enhance the overall walking experience, pedestrians seek out and utilize sidewalk facilities and community trails that are in close proximity to their property and provide a safe place to walk as well as an environment that provides a certain amount of visual interest. Sidewalks and community trails serve as a critical component in the transportation network providing users access to parks and recreational areas, schools, commercial areas, and neighbors. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sidewalks provide many benefits including safety, mobility and healthier communities (FHWA, n.d). • Improved Aesthetics: A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed-Use Solutions, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The continued maintenance of the inter-connecting sidewalks and community trails improves the livability and appeal for properties within the District. • Increased Safety: According to the FHWA, sidewalks reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrians involved in accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008). • Economic Activity: Uniform and well-maintained sidewalk and community trail improvements create cohesion throughout the District. This cohesion enhances both the residential and retail experience as well as encourages maximum use of building and lot area. According to Active Living Research (2010), economic benefits of walkable developments include enhanced marketability and faster sales or leases than conventional development. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 230 design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for and access to existing businesses, but also is a proven method for attracting new development (Pugliese, 2008). Street Landscaping The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. • Improved Aesthetics: Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents to the community. • Increased Safety: Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces (Wolf, 2010). The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions. Furthermore, maintained sidewalks and trails increase pedestrian safety by reducing the number of trips and falls from those using the improvements. • Economic Activity: Well-maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous, but can spur investment in the property. According to the FHWA, landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business (FHWA, 2001). Parks Park facilities enhance the overall quality of an area and are an important component of complete and sustainable neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks offer both active and passive recreational opportunities: a place to play, exercise, spend time with neighbors, or relax. The parks within the District are developed and maintained to appeal to all age groups and interests, Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 231 and promote a healthy community. Recreation and park facilities have proven to be a potent factor in maintaining a high standard of livability in the community. • Improved Aesthetics. The park improvements provide beautification, shade and enhancement to properties, which creates a sense of community for the parcels within the District. The overall appeal and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, appeal and desirability decrease when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. According to The Trust for Public Land, Corporate CEOs say that employee quality of life is the third most important factor in locating new businesses (Harnik and Welle, n.d.). • Economic Activity: Parks attract both businesses and residents to communities. According to The Trust for Public Land, small company owners say recreation, parks and open spaces in close proximity to properties used for business purposes are the highest priority in choosing a new location for their businesses. As a result of the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and parks) being maintained, the overall livability for properties within the District will increase. Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area. The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation: The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources. Quantification of Benefit As a result of the District maintenance and servicing activities, there will be a level of general benefits to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District maintenance and servicing activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners' assessments. The District currently consists of 5,890 single family residences, 972 condominium units, 729 multi-family (apartment) units, 57.97 acres of commercial property, 4 schools, 1 Church, 1 fire Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 232 station, and 16.97 acres of undeveloped property. Properties are classified by their land use code as shown on San Bernardino County's latest secured roll. Sidewalks and Community Trails The City is comprised of many smaller communities located throughout the City. Most of the communities have parks and schools that are proximate to and serve the residents in their immediate vicinity. There are four schools in addition to the six parks within the District. Two of the four schools have school District boundaries that are only within the District. However, two of the schools include areas outside of the District as part of their school district boundaries. The primary reason persons living outside the District would enter the District would be to access the schools. Therefore, we must consider the school district boundary areas outside of the District when analyzing the pedestrian traffic that may use the sidewalks and community trails within the District. The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011). According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 2.98 persons. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 6,957 residential units within the District, there are approximately 20,732 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the City's average household size, there are approximately 35,760 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but within the school district boundaries. The following shows the estimated number of residential units and persons within the school district boundaries and either within or outside the District boundaries: Estimated Estimated Number of Number of School District Population Residential Units Persons Within District Boundaries 6,957 20,732 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 35,760 Total Population 18,957 56,492 In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the 11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total number of persons within District and school district boundaries (56,492). There are Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 233 approximately 6,610 people within proximity of the District that utilize walking as their mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage to the District population (20,732), we estimate that of the 6,610 persons who are within close proximity of the District and use walking as their primary mode of transportation, 2,426 people are within the District boundaries. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, who use walking as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 4,184 people. Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 2,426 Outside District Boundaries 4,184 Total Population—uses walking as 6,610 primary mode of transportation In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District's boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands. The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District: Number of Walking Trip Purpose Trips(in millions) School/Daycare/Religious Activity 872 Shopping/Errands 5,820 Social/Recreational 2,268 Don't know/Other 139 Total 9,099 Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions) or 42.81% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would utilize the sidewalk and trail improvements within the District. Applying this percentage (42.81%) to the number of people using walking as their mode of transportation and that live outside of the District (4,184), but use the sidewalks and community trails within the District, there are approximately 1,791 people using the maintained sidewalks and community trails for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 3.17% of the total school district population (56,492), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 234 School District Boundary General 3.17% Benefit Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the sidewalks and trails within the District, but would use those proximate to their own properties. The City has regional trails that connect different areas of the City, and those trails do appeal to and attract other residents of the City as well as residents that live outside the City. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large use the sidewalks or community trails within the District. As such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the sidewalk and community trails to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1.00% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the sidewalk and trail improvements is estimated to be 4.17% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.83%. Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17% Street Landscaping Based upon the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy, the streets within the District are classified into one of the following categories: arterial, collector, or local (minor) streets. The majority of street landscaping is located along roads classified as collector and local streets and primarily situated within the public right-of-ways of the internal local street network. A portion of the maintained landscaping is, however, located along the arterial streets, and, as such, provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic. Local Streets For purposes of determining general and special benefits, all streets within the District other than the specific streets listed as collector and arterial streets below are considered local streets. The local streets within the District were intended to serve individual neighborhoods and not to be pass-through streets, but cul-de-sacs or loop roads to reduce through traffic (Victoria Community Plan, 1980). In addition, according to the City's General Plan (2010), the primary intended purpose of local streets is to serve fronting properties. From a visual inspection of the layout of the District one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District's local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the "general public" for purposes of determining general benefit. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 235 However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass through traffic even on something such as a cul-de-sac. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), "... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits." Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street landscaping, one could imagine a small degree of "residential tourism" wherein drivers are in fact simply "passing through" to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 1.00% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increase safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on local streets to be 2.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 98.00%. Local Street General Benefit 2.00% Collector Streets: Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St Because of the similarities in use, layout, type, and designation, the benefits of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St are considered to be equal. Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St border the District and are used as the main access to and from properties within the District. Victoria Park Ln serves as the main access point to each of the four schools and is the connector street running through the District. Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St connect the various neighborhoods, schools and parks within the District in addition to providing circulation between the local streets and the arterial network. As such, we must also consider the neighborhoods that surround the District and are within the school district boundaries, but not within the actual District when analyzing vehicle traffic that may use the streets within the District. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not include the traffic volume and number of daily trips on the connector streets within the District. As such a study is unavailable at this time we have use the NHTS Pacific Division data in order to estimate the number of drivers who use the streets within the District. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 152,827 (in millions) or 84.11% of those trips were made using a personal motor vehicle (FHWA, 2011). According to the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, household file, U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), the mean drivers per household is 1.75. Based on the drivers per household average, and considering the 6,957 households within the District, there are approximately 12,175 drivers within the District. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the drivers per household average, there are approximately 21,000 additional drivers that reside outside of the District boundaries, but are in close proximity to the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 236 Estimated Estimated Number of Number of School District Population Residential Units Drivers Within District Boundaries 6,957 12,175 Outside District Boundaries 12,000 21,000 Total 18,957 33,175 Applying the percentage of vehicle trips (84.11%) reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study to the District and school district boundaries area outside of the District population sets (33,175), approximately 27,903 people are within proximity of the District that utilize a private vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS vehicle trip percentage to the estimated number of drivers within the District (12,175) approximately 10,240 people within the District boundaries use a personal vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, that uses a vehicle as their mode of transportation is estimated to be 17,663 people. Estimated Number School District Population of Persons Within District Boundaries 10,240 Outside District Boundaries 17,663 Total Population—uses personal vehicle 27,903 as primary mode of transportation In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel's within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands. The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District: Number of Vehicle Trip Purpose Trips(in millions) School/Daycare/Religious Activity 6,470 Shopping/Errands 30,998 Social/Recreational 16,185 Don't know/Other 688 Total 54,341 Of the total number of vehicle trips reported, 54,341 (in millions) or 35.56% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would most likely utilize the collector streets within the District. Applying this percentage to the number of people using vehicles as their primary mode of Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 237 transportation and live outside of the District (17,663), but would use Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave or Church St as a connector to their destination within the District, there are approximately 6,281 people using the maintained streets for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 18.93% of the total estimated drivers (33,175), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit. As previously mentioned, the local street special benefit has been estimated at 98.00% and, as such, the estimated minimum special benefit of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St should be reduced by 2.00% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on collector streets is estimated to be 20.93% and the special benefit is estimated to be 79.07%. Collector Street General Benefit 20.93% Arterial Streets: Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips. The arterial streets with landscape improvements serve not only residents in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does not identify the percentage of traffic on arterial streets, which is pass- through traffic. Before we determine and allocate the percentage of special and general benefit for the arterial streets, we must first compute the estimated pass-through traffic. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic on the arterial streets, the estimated number of special benefit trips on the collector streets has been used since in order to enter or exit the District, a vehicle must travel on one of the arterial streets listed below. Per the City's General Plan (2010), collector streets have an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day, for an average of 12,500. Taking the 12,500 average daily trips for collector streets, 2,616 trips (20.93%) are for general benefit purposes, and 9,884 trips (79.07%), is deemed to be for special benefit purposes. Estimated Number of Trips Collector Street Special Benefit—79.07% 9,884 Collector Street General Benefit—20.93%' 2,616 Total 12,500 (1) The 20.93% general benefit percentage already includes the 2.00% general benefit to account for the portion of traffic using for local streets. The City's Traffic Study (2009) does provide an estimated number of daily trips for specific areas within the District. When the City's Traffic Study (2009) did not provide the estimated number of daily trips the average number was derived from the estimates provided in the City's General Plan. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 238 Average Number of Street Name Vehicles per Dayl Milliken Ave 30,400 Base Line Rd 19,140 Day Creek Blvd 25,000 Rochester Ave 12,500 (1) Average Number of Vehicles per Day is from the City's Traffic Study for Milliken Ave and Base Line Rd, (average based on City's Traffic Study at points of street within the District),and from the City's General Plan for Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave. Based on the estimated number of 9,884 trips for special benefit purposes, we then reduce the average number of vehicles for each arterial street, to calculate our estimated pass-through trips. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not residing in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place. Average Number Less: Estimated Number Estimated % of Vehicles Estimated Special of Pass General Street Name per Day Benefit Trips Through Trips Benefit Milliken Ave 30,400 9,884 20,516 67.49% Base Line Rd 19,140 9,884 9,256 48.36% Day Creek Blvd 25,000 9,884 15,116 60.47% Rochester Ave 12,500 9,884 2,616 20.93% Although Rochester Ave is listed as an arterial, the City's General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy includes this street as a Tertiary Travel Corridor, which categorizes the street as more locally oriented and locally travelled. In addition, the Roadway Hierarchy says that the typical number of vehicles per day is between 10,000 and 15,000 (average 12,500). Etiwanda Avenue and Church St are also included in the category, and as such, the general benefit trip percentage is close to the same as for the collector streets. As previously mentioned, the estimated minimum special benefit of Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave have already been reduced by 2% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit. Street Landscaping General Benefit Percentage The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections were then applied to each type of road in the District. The area in square feet of landscaping being maintained in the District was determined by the City's Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage for each road and street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the overall general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 239 Total Square General Benefit General Benefit Street Name Street Type(1) Footage Percentage Square Footage Milliken Ave Arterial 265,926 67.49% 179,473 Base Line Rd Arterial 367,018 48.36% 177,490 Day Creek Blvd Arterial 263,062 60.47% 159,074 Rochester Ave Arterial 175,573 20.93% 36,747 Church St Collector 181,344 20.93% 37,955 Etiwanda Ave Collector 10,358 20.93% 2,168 Highland Ave Collector 290,275 20.93% 60,755 Victoria Park Ln Collector 1,348,966 20.93% 282,339 Local/Minor Streets Local/Minor Streets 2,912,709 2.00% 58,254 Totals: 994,255 Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10% Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements is estimated to be 17.10% and the special benefit is estimated to be 82.90%. Neighborhood Parks The six parks within the District were installed specifically for the residents of the District. Each of the parks is considered to be a neighborhood park, intended to serve those parcels within a one-half mile radius from the park. All parcels within the District are within a one-half mile from one of the six neighborhood parks, and most parcels outside of the District have their own neighborhood parks within close proximity. Even though the park facilities were installed for the benefit of the residents and those working within the District, there will be some general benefit to those people who do not live or conduct business inside the District. There are 43.10 acres of park land within the District. According to the Trip Generation (2003) report, a City park generates an average of 1.59 trips per acre, with a range of rates between 1.04 — 8.00 (arithmetic mean is 4.52). Considering the mean rate per acre (4.52 trips), there are approximately 195 daily trips generated for parks within the District. According to the 2009 NHTS database, the average number of persons per vehicle is estimated to be 1.61 persons. Therefore, based on the 195 daily park trips generated, 314 people are using the parks within the District. There is a standard of one-half mile as a reasonable distance to walk to a park (California DOT, 1979). There are 6,957 households within the District, and an additional 1,834 households that are within a one-half mile and have direct access to the parks, but whose properties are not within the boundaries of the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 240 Estimated One-Half Mile Number of Park Population Residential Units Percentage Within District Boundaries 6,957 79.14% Outside District Boundaries 1,834 20.86% Total Population 8,791 100.00% To allocate the average of park trips generated and people using the parks within the District, we allocate the 314 estimated people using the parks daily by the percentages shown above. Based on the one-half mile radius population, approximately 66 people may use the parks within the District, but living outside of the boundaries of the District. Estimated Number of One-Half Mile People Using Park Population Parks Daily Within District Boundaries 248 Outside District Boundaries 66 Total Population 314 A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property. However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks. Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%. One-Half Mile Boundary General Benefit 3.60% Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large. Public at large General Benefit 1.00% Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 241 Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and economic activity benefits resulting from the park improvements is estimated to be 4.60% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.40%. Park General Benefit 4.60% Collective General Benefit Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, increased safety and economic activity benefits resulting from a blend of improvements (sidewalks, trails, street landscaping and parks), the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below: Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17% Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10% Park General Benefit 4.60% District General Benefit 8.62% The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 8.62%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 91.38%. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 242 The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and right-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed. As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel: • Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits. • Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). • Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel's benefit points multiplied by the parcel's benefit factor. The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel. Apportioning of Special Benefit As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 40 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 243 The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,890 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel's benefit units have been determined. Aesthetic Benefit Points Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the District. In addition, the community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi-Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi- Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points. Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City's Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 41 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 244 from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District. Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit. To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics. The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Aesthetic Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 42 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 245 Safety Benefit Points Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property's proximity to the improvements as well as the property's existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi-Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points. A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive. Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points. Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety. The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 43 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 246 Safety Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Economic Benefit Points Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property's location to the District activities, as well as the property's existing land use. The District's improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single-family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi-family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single-family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single-family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi-family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi-family residential unit, per the City's Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single-family residential unit. To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City's Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the District are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%. Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points. The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place. Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 44 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 247 The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points. Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit. The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District: Economic Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Total Special Benefit Points Calculation The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District: Parcel's Total Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Special Benefit = Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Parcel Factors The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 248 redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel. Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel. The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below: Parcel's Total Parcel's Total Parcel Benefit Units = Special Benefit X Factor Points Total Special Benefit Units The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 81,554.33 Data Considerations and Parcel Changes The use of the latest Assessor's Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel's land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment. Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels. This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, "... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 46 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 249 demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit." Publicly owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll. Rate per Benefit Unit The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation: Rate per Total Costs to District's Total Benefit Unit be Assessed / Benefit Units Method of Assessment Spread The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel's number of units or lot size (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District. A (B) C Parcel's Total = Parcel's Total X Parcel Benefit Units Special Benefit Factor Points (B) Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Parcel's Total Special Benefit Aesthetic + Safety + Economic Points Benefit Points Benefit Points Benefit Points (C) Residential Parcel Factor = Units Parcel Factor Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage Applying the Method of Assessment Spread The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure: Step 1: Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor's Secured Roll data. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 47 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 250 Step 2: Determine each parcel's appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table: Aesthetic Parcel Land Use Category Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 3: Determine each parcel's appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table: Safety Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Single Family Residential 3.00 Condominium Residential 2.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.10 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30 Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00 Step 4: Determine each parcel's appropriate economic benefit points based on land use. The economic benefit points are shown in the following table: Economic Parcel Land Use Category Benefit Points Single Family Residential 4.00 Condominium Residential 3.20 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 Commercial/Industrial 18.00 Public Service Parcels— Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50 Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 48 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 251 Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table: Aesthetic Safety Economic Total Benefit Benefit Benefit Benefit Parcel Land Use Category Points Points Points Points Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00 Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10 Multi-Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70 Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00 Public Service Parcels- Church/ Fire Station/ School 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20 Common Area/ Roads/ Easements/ Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Step 6: Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel's land use. The unit of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table: Residential Parcel Factor = Units Non-Residential Parcel - Acreage Factor Step 7: Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel's total special benefit units. Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District. Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit. Step 10: Multiply each parcel's total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel's assessment. Step 11: In future years the rate per benefit unit may be adjusted by inflation. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 - City of Rancho Cucamonga 49 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#02 Page 252 Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates The Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2021/22, the calculation is as follows: Maximum Assessment Special Benefit / District's Total per Benefit Unit to be Assessed Benefit Units $49.68 = $ 4,051,619.11 / 81,554.33 Maximum Allowable Total Benefit Assessment for Parcel Land Use Category Points Parcel Factor 2021/22 Single Family Residential 11.00 Parcel $ 546.45 Condominium Residential 8.10 Unit 402.15 Multi-Family Residential 7.70 Unit 382.04 Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,583.24 Public Service Parcels - Church/ Fire Station/ School 3.00 Acre 149.03 Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 108.81 Common Area/ Roads / Easements/ Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00 Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2014/15, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside — San Bernardino — Ontario Consumer Price Index area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI-U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2021/22 will remain at $503.80 per single-family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 50 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 253 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 51 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 254 -n r Q n a } City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 C Nm RANCHO E _ _ _ (Victoria Neighborhood Parks ■Iail.l .l.l�Ll�Irl�l�l 1�1�1 I.ul.,�l.l�l Plf�; f1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.,M'mjm1m1�1de 7 ' . ■ N (D N D Hillside Rd ! ' L ra m . 1 Wilson Av — ' 0• Banyan St ! 0 Z # o ► .,,.. N ' 19th St n i � o Base Line Rd Base Line Rd D f. 0 i 1r o n Foothill BI 0 Foothill BI n v 0 Arrow Rt Arrow Rt v i 8th St ,, i � + o tl3 5 Legend 4th St' 4th St /D� i City Limits l/ The—s,dm.ad ip�giaphk hi%n roil orbi')"Imk by and t{mugh = e�oty.rP.< a—�n" —kq asa — ,.p aid hem. d } Q dq d Rer.ty triairv;�make nor N,pYes m risrai5t nlhn a Weaneee eQ W,� ,. o n—dines.f > to L N LIM IQ 2 uun]d m�vu Fr.�r The ug duitl nd zhr upon tK Idmr�>m forCD anx rmmo IQ } Y m � m ,0�aM al ine-r-ra— f NZ The cq of Pmdw C—rga moh"ma ww,urt Fnlan.n dtmrns mry and.a E = N N ad,se—� InoWm hit no[Imfld m,de I I �uanhes i ' Cn f qq as fEieas for.pamo�ier Page.Rz City d k—Am cumn� = w k.0 Miles it ,ah neef�ao ro asu�any lee,ln�regandha of v e mus.nm for iq am 1 0_5 '0 1 O Cn -6no-- m,P�n a�,e..�uup�fnf—law hi-Haan N N �'° q� � ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Units/ Property Type (County Use Code) Rate Per EBU Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $ 45.80 5,890.00 64,790.00 $ 2,967,205.30 Condominium Residential 45.80 972.00 7,873.20 360,349.56 Multi-Family Residential 45.80 729.00 5,613.30 257,089.14 Commercial/ Industrial 45.80 57.97 3,014.44 138,053.82 Public Service Parcels—Church/Fire Station/School 45.80 75.28 226.06 10,344.07 Undeveloped 45.80 16.97 37.33 1,709.79 Total 1 1 7,741.221 81,554.331 $ 3,734,751.68 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 53 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #02 Page 256 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) Page 257 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 258 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 8 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10 District Budget 10 Definitions of Budget Items 12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13 Overview 13 General Benefit 14 Special Benefit 14 Method of Assessment Spread 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18 Assessment Roll 18 Annexations 18 Page 259 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 138,450 Operations and Maintenance 838,450 Total Expenditures Budget 976,900 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 815,820 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 9,610 Subtotal - Taxes 825,430 Other Revenues 86,800 Total Revenues Budget 912,230 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (64,670) Total District EBU Count 2,919.71 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 282.24 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 352.80 Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 260 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 261 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally, describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 262 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Blvd on the north, 4th St on the South, East Ave on the east and Grove Ave on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways, Metrolink, and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 263 materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location J-2 The monument at the northeast corner of Haven Ave and 4th St. Ground Cover area: 5,715 square feet Hardscape area: 6,068 square feet J-3 The 6th St median from Milliken Ave to Pittsburg Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,300 square feet J-4 The entry monuments on the east and west side of 4th St and Milliken Ave. The Milliken Ave median from 4th St to 6th St. Ground Cover area: 30,594 square feet Hardscape area: 1,748 square feet J-5 The Milliken Ave median from Arrow Rte to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 10,220 square feet J-6 The Spruce Ave median from Foothill Blvd to White Oak Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,300 square feet J-7 The 6th St median from Pittsburg Ave to Richmond PI. Ground Cover area: 5,114 square feet J-8 The 6th St from Richmond PI to Buffalo Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,476 square feet J-9 The Milliken Ave railroad underpass. Ground Cover area: 165,633 square feet, J-10 The 6th St median from Cleveland Ave to 1,820 feet east of Cleveland Ave. Ground Cover area: 15,884 square feet J-11 The 6th St median from Buffalo Ave to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,789 square feet J-12 The Milliken Ave median from Arrow Rte to Century Ct. Ground Cover area: 13,855 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 264 J-13 The Milliken Ave median from Century Ct to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 3,330 square feet J-14 The 6th St median from Utica Ave to Cleveland Ave. Ground Cover area: 8,559 square feet J-15 The 6th St median from Haven Ave to Utica Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,680 square feet J-16 Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 8,466 square feet J-17 The Day Creek Blvd median south of Foothill Blvd including the traffic circle. Ground Cover area: 6,490 square feet H-1 The Haven Ave median from 4th St to 6th St. Ground Cover area: 21,205 square feet Converted 8,935 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-2 The Haven Ave medians from 6th St to the underpass bridge. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven Ave from Acacia St to underpass bridge. Ground Cover area: 54,720 square feet Converted 2,960 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. H-3 The Haven Ave medians from underpass bridge to Arrow Rte. The east and west side parkways and slopes on Haven Ave from the underpass bridge to Jersey Blvd. Ground Cover area: 56,210 square feet H-4 The Haven Ave median from Arrow Rte to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 15,156 square feet H-5 The Haven Ave median from Foothill Blvd to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet FH-1 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 9,141; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 265 FH-2 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 15,879; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH-3 The Foothill Blvd median from 790 feet west of Market PI to Market PI. Ground Cover area: 4,434 square feet FH-4 The Foothill Blvd median from Market PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,392 square feet FH-5 The Foothill Blvd median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH-6 The Foothill Blvd median from Masi Dr Plaza to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet The total square footage for the improvement is 1,600; however, due to the location of the improvement the other half is maintained by landscape maintenance district 4-R. FH-7 The Foothill Blvd median from Vineyard Ave to Orchard Plaza. Ground Cover area: 2,605 square feet FH-8 The Foothill Blvd median from Orchard Plaza to Lion St. Ground Cover area: 344 square feet FH-9 The Foothill Blvd median from Hellman Ave to Malachite Ave and from Malachite Ave to Archibald Ave. Ground Cover area: 21,474 square feet FH-10 The Foothill Blvd median from Archibald Ave to Ramona Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet FH-11 The Foothill Blvd median from Ramona Ave to Hermosa Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,210 square feet FH-12 The Foothill Blvd median from Hermosa Ave to Center Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,329 square feet FH-13 The Foothill Blvd median from Center Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 6,286 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 266 FH-14 The Foothill Blvd median from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,356 square feet Site reduced to 5,979 square feet due to median renovation. FH-15 The Foothill Blvd median from 1,225 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Ground Cover area: 4,905 square feet FH-16 The Foothill Blvd median from Day Creek Blvd to the 15 freeway. Ground Cover area: 9,808 square feet Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 267 -n r v < City of Rancho Cucamonga 0� fl Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B cD E s Y RANCHO _I l � € � Irrigation Sites fV cuca.Moti�a f = 4 2 2 CD 0 rV 7 F ■ M N N =3 Hillside Rd ,l c`3 CD ± � . �WilsanAv i L � 0' Banyan St 4'k i z Z o � 19th St'% n f � ---�' iu Base Line Rd i 4--,jr Base Line Rd 0=r / O J1s 11 c Foothill BI 1 J6 J13 J17 °1 Foothill BI a) j IL 3 'J12 Sport Complex Arrow Rt o Arrow Rt J5 cn � $th St ,{ Legend �y � � �5r 1 �J11 • Water Meters 0 J3 R > a J1 tll SI'ti J1 � . . .J$ I Irriqatior`Pumps n 1 J2 J4 Irrigation Lines i I 4th 5 4th Stt �= tea aap,dam,a,e yacymanic rlanwon "Iabe ay and fl—pt. d LM a 313 tl�e ary d parcho Ommorr�an•P��as a puNt n�unx a rya H-nmum. 13 (Q ory ar Horan n,maax>�mare—ffnpb--x�*aeN.aq.. aan Q p�emmee CD m m, —M.0 m—.--y,,�—«nmdines �m,� h—n. ,+.—d-Ad na nd,,�P ��b f-oar nffi rts v 4}1 , City Limits NZ ara s anaud m rnmaadaaw+a=fr m orb a1 Lhnraam pmada 'M.C4 d Radio C—.,a e h m am a di Irarama damrm ar,y and al E , it d—Kdnfl rry an fidn—In a pa r 0u .T1. Oty of Fa-1a Cuamaya = >_ N O shad net[w a� any balm re�wrdc d c —� br p)am ¢ = q Miles e o efl =R=a�na�ra�In am 10 am,pr—We a.V-(11)any a 1 I}-5 Q 1 �reren o-r"e;many pvsra bow apoa v t,,m tIcn awila'e men Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 269 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 79,820 Part-time Salaries 14,860 Fringe Benefits 43,770 Subtotal - Personnel 138,450 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Computer Software 500 O & M/General 17,050 O & M/Facilities 11,500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 29,050 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 380,710 Contract Services/Facilities 181,320 Tree Maintenance 26,210 Subtotal - Contract Services 588,240 Utilities: Water Utilities 133,120 Electric Utilities 37,730 Subtotal - Utilities 170,850 Assessment Administration 6,240 Admin./General Overhead 44,070 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 838,450 Total Expenditures Budget $ 976,900 Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 270 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 815,820 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 9,610 Subtotal - Taxes 825,430 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 26,700 Parking Permits 60,000 Other Revenue 100 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 86,800 Total Revenues Budget 912,230 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (64,670) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 824,058.95 Total District EBU Count 2,919.71 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 282.24 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 352.80 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 2,407,705 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (64,670) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 2,343,035 Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 271 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 272 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 273 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. Traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 274 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#03 Page 275 assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non-Residential $352.80 $282.24 2,919.71 2,919.71 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 276 -n r Q a' City of Rancho Cucamonga CD ti E � } e Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B v CDC�",OH° �, :a - Commercial Industrial) CD --------- r.l�frl...r �f.f.f.f.f.f�.r�.�.uuf.r.l.6l.l,,olo! �N (D M � � N N =3 Hillside Rd ! m f f 0 1 Wilson Av 0. Banyan St ! Z ; o �6 . F W 19t1� St w n oBase Line Rd et`- ZBaseLine Rd a) +.�r 0 (� Foothill BI '� Foothill Bl c 0 a)3 At Rt Arrow Rt 0 __,L cQ i a) 8th St � M , ta6th Legend D ° w i I z •.l.f.f, --1 5 4th St' J,4th St ' i City Limits n m�.o d'mom, a�phk 1[annrefmo�anQ a�I�b e� 7 7 7 7 > > ��.�.�i v= rn. of k—C � make v �l d Q d Q 4 as --K� .. m,�,� . e 73 M � LM D 3B pwued m}nu lawn 71.—,1.——nor upon—L/an�vr for any rmmn � are s d.c�m tdmadmw raTy arty antl of ]r"—'m� d raen E CD m 71.Cty a P-.k Q�a OkM vvd—1 imranon duns am am au t E a1 ro nnp1W N p��are wmmm� Inq,ru ra u�l m,r i ern— i 2 �J� r.d rn.�ann6.q'are fl� pnr a pae=tar p� .ttn ON of fatndn C—n—W = a] U M I e slut-er � nr sue any ua6fnyc mFrd�of v.muanv far p7 a, 2 ❑ cmr�orr K a Inemra�In am lrfmrvtln prwd. and (II)"arbor or C � O rnamon®rrrp a—m arty p.raaas iwwro-upon�trrf.—n —1m.r ner, (.W 00 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non-Residential $282.24 2,919.71 2,919.71 $824,058.95 Totals 2,919.71 2,919.71 $824,058.95 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Alan Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0209-251-10 03/05/20 DRC2018-00711 4.60 4.60 CO/IND 0209-013-13& 14 09/16/20 DRC2018-00430 1.56 1.56 CO/IND 0207-262-28,35, 36,41, 42,45 and 46 1 11/04/20 DRC2018-00912 11.11 11.11 CO/IND 0209-211-24 1 12/02/20 1 DRC2018-00529 13.45 13.45 MIND Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #03 Page 278 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) Page 279 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4-11 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 280 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 13 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 15 District Budget 15 Definitions of Budget Items 17 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 18 Overview 18 General Benefit 19 Special Benefit 19 Method of Assessment Spread 20 Cost of Living Inflator 22 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 23 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 25 Assessment Roll 25 Annexations 25 Page 281 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 1,068,270 Operations and Maintenance 1,599,390 Capital Expenditures 700,000 Total Expenditures Budget 3,367,660 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,772,040 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 10,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,782,790 Other Revenues 79,850 Total Revenues Budget 2,862,640 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (505,020) Total District EBU Count 7,049.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 482.44 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 282 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 283 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally, describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 284 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of Foothill Blvd, west of Rochester Ave, east of Haven Ave, south of Base Line Rd and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Rd and Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble- shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 285 and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park The street trees within the residential parkways and tree maintenance easements to be maintained by the District are on the following streets, located within the boundaries of the District: Amiata Dr Covington PI Meyers Dr Bastia Ct Danbury Dr Potomac Ct Blackhorse Ct Danner Ct Radcliff PI Brandywine PI De Anza Dr Regent Dr Bunker Hill Dr Derby PI Rockingham Ct Cedarbrook PI Downing Ct Saranza PI Chesterton Dr Ellena East & West Southhampton Ct Clarisa PI (s/o Terra Vista Pkwy to Terra Vista Pkwy Corsica Ct Fitzpatrick Dr) (Church St to Brandywine (Country View Dr to Emery PI PI) Milliken Ave) Fitzpatrick Dr Wellington PI Country View Dr Fulbourn Ct Yorktown Ct (Mountain View Dr to Hinton Ct Palacio Ct) Linaro Rd The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location TV-1 The monument on the southeast corner of Haven Ave and Base Line Rd. The Base Line Rd median from Haven Ave to the Deer Creek Channel. The south side of Base Line from Haven to Deer Creek Channel less from the frontage of the condominium complex. Ground Cover area: 22,054 square feet Hardscape area: 10,630 square feet TV-2 The Base Line Rd median from Spruce Ave to the Deer Creek Channel. The south side of Base Line Rd from Deer Creek Channel to Spruce Ave. The west side of Spruce Ave from Base Line Rd to Terra Vista Pkwy. The north side of Spyglass Dr from Spruce Ave to Roxbury PI. Ground Cover area: 18,863 square feet Turf area: 15,067 square feet Hardscape area: 12,575 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 286 TV-3 The east side of Spruce from 120 feet south of Spyglass Dr to Base Line Rd. The south side of Base Line Rd from Spruce Ave to 800 feet east of Spruce Ave. The Base Line Rd median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,670 square feet Turf area: 14,857 square feet Hardscape area: 16,567 square feet TV-4 The south side of Base Line Rd from 800 feet east of Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. The cul-de-sac at the north end of Cascade Ct. Ground Cover area: 16,613 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,324 square feet Hardscape area: 7,950 square feet TV-5 The north side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Belpine PI to 112 feet west of Butterfield PI; Terra Vista Pkwy median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave and the south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 164 feet west of Belpine PI to Belpine PI. Ground Cover area: 19,738 square feet Turf area: 2,675 square feet Hardscape area: 13,328 square feet TV-6 The north side of from Spruce Ave to 175 feet north of Countryside Dr and Terra Vista Pkwy median from Church St to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,959 square feet Turf area: 6,195 square feet Hardscape area: 11,702 square feet TV-7 The north side of Church St from the west side of Deer Creek Channel to Terra Vista Pkwy. The west side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Church St to 175 feet north of Countryside Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,924 square feet Turf area: 5,378 square feet Hardscape area: 6,426 square feet TV-8 The southeast corner of Church St and Haven Ave; the Church St median from Haven Ave to Terra Vista Pkwy and the wash end on the Northwest corner of the Deer Creek Channel and Church St. Ground Cover area: 2,429 square feet Hardscape area: 3,296 square feet TV-9 The Church St median from Terra Vista Pkwy to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,829 square feet Hardscape area: 6,605 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 287 TV-10 The east side of Valencia Ave from Base Line Rd to the pre-school; the south side of Augusta Dr from Valencia Ave to Meadowlark PI and the west side of Summerfield PI from Valencia Ave to Evergreen Dr. Ground Cover area: 20,818 square feet Turf area: 18,634 square feet Hardscape area: 8,666 square feet TV-11 The paseo at Parkside PI and Clover Ct from Parkside PI to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,795 square feet Hardscape area: 1,049 square feet TV-12 The east side of Haven Ave from the pre-school to the Southern Pacific Railroad. Ground Cover area: 6,170 square feet Turf area: 2,091 square feet Hardscape area: 1,060 square feet TV-13 The east side of Spruce Ave from Elm Ave to Mountain View Dr; the north and south sides of Norfolk Dr from Spruce Ave to Cardiff PI; the south side of Mountain View Dr from Spruce Ave to 290 feet east of Belvedere PI and the paseo from Spruce Ave to Country View Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,459 square feet Turf area: 3,355 square feet Hardscape area: 8,886 square feet TV-14 The south side of Mountain View Dr from 290 feet east of Belvedere PI to 590 feet east of Fairhaven PI; the paseo south of Mountain View Dr between Belvedere PI and Fairhaven PI to Country View Dr and from Country View Dr to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 19,030 square feet Turf area: 8,430 square feet Hardscape area: 9,262 square feet TV-15 The north side of Mountain View Dr from 634 feet west of Biarritz PI to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet Turf area: 4,738 square feet Hardscape area: 5,104 square feet TV-16 The West Greenway Corridor from the northeast corner of Elm Ave and Spruce Ave to West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 15,529 square feet Turf area: 20,884 square feet Hardscape area: 20,626 square feet TV-17 The west side of Milliken Ave from 585 feet north of Mountain View Dr to Mountain View Dr. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 288 Ground Cover area: 5,835 square feet Turf area: 3,564 square feet Hardscape area: 2,340 square feet TV-18 The south side of Mountain View Dr from approximately 250 feet west of Claridge PI to Terra Vista Pkwy. The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Mountain View Dr to East Greenway Corridor. Terra Vista Pkwy from Mountain View Dr to East Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 18,316 square feet Turf area: 5,944 square feet Hardscape area: 23,800 square feet TV-19 The Terra Vista Pkwy median from Milliken Ave to Mountain View Dr. The north side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 68 feet north of Addison Rd to Mountain View Dr. The west side of Mountain View Dr from Grapevine St to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 20,306 square feet Turf area: 3,886 square feet Hardscape area: 11,478 square feet TV-20 The Church St median from Milliken Ave to 675 feet east of Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 2,860 square feet Hardscape area: 2,112 square feet TV-21 The Church St median from Milliken Ave to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 16,811 square feet Turf area: 335 square feet Hardscape area: 14,880 square feet TV-22 The Milliken Ave median from Mountain View Dr to Foothill Blvd. Ground Cover area: 16,436 square feet Hardscape area: 16,267 square feet TV-23 The Milliken Ave underpass from West Greenway Park to Milliken Park. Ground Cover area: 19,271 square feet Turf area: 22,139 square feet Hardscape area: 18,119 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 289 TV-24 The east side of Haven Ave from 145 feet south of Creekbridge St to 600 feet north of Creekbridge St; the north side of Creekbridge St from Brookside Rd to Haven Ave and the paseo from Creekbridge St and Brookside Rd to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 5,851 square feet Turf area: 9,965 square feet Hardscape area: 4,351 square feet TV-25 The east side of Haven Ave form 145 feet south of Creekbridge St to 410 feet south of Creekbridge St. Ground Cover area: 3,319 square feet Turf area: 1,677 square feet Hardscape area: 1,779 square feet TV-26 The paseo at Plymouth Way south of Essex PI from Plymouth Way to the Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,956 square feet Hardscape area: 2,385 square feet TV-27 The paseo from Terra Vista Pkwy to Windsong PI and from Windsong PI to Plymouth Way. Ground Cover area: 2,270 square feet Turf area: 2,731 square feet Hardscape area: 3,332 square feet TV-28 The paseo on the north side of 7552 Hardy Ave. Ground Cover area: 630 square feet Turf area: 733 square feet Hardscape area: 432 square feet TV-29 The East Greenway Corridor from Milliken Park to Terra Vista Pkwy, including the turf area at the entrance to Tract 16157. Ground Cover area: 17,780 square feet Turf area: 52,403 square feet Hardscape area: 29,888 square feet TV-30 The Milliken Ave Median from Mountain View Dr to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 11,890 square feet Hardscape area: 10,260 square feet TV-31 The paseo from Elm Ave to West Greenway Park. Ground Cover area: 4,770 square feet Hardscape area: 8,900 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 290 TV-32 The Greenwich PI paseo from Greenwich PI to Muirfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,323 square feet Hardscape area: 1,456 square feet TV-33 The south side of Mountain View Dr from 430 feet west of Country View Dr to Country View Dr. Ground Cover area: 3,434 square feet Turf area: 1,853 square feet Hardscape area: 1,720 square feet TV-34 The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from 390 feet west of Belpine PI to Belpine PI. Ground Cover area: 1,342 square feet Turf area: 1,887 square feet Hardscape area: 1,612 square feet TV-35 The Trail Northeast of Ruth Musser School from Terra Vista Pkwy to Spruce Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,285 square feet Hardscape area: 5,148 square feet TV-36 The east side of Country View Dr from Corsica Ct to Mountain View Dr. The south side of Mountain View Dr from Country View Dr to Milliken Ave. The west side of Milliken Ave from Mountain View Dr to the West Greenway Corridor. Ground Cover area: 9,141 square feet Turf area: 5,895 square feet Hardscape area: 6,058 square feet TV-37 The north side of Meyers Dr from Emery PI to Elm Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,860 square feet Turf area: 5,300 square feet Hardscape area: 1,283 square feet TV-38 The Church St median from Rochester Ave to Terra Vista Pkwy median from Church St to 853 feet north of Church St. Ground Cover area: 8,510 square feet Hardscape area: 5,640 square feet TV-39 The north side of Mountain View Dr form 250 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The east side of Milliken Ave from Mountain View Dr to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 16,751 square feet Hardscape area: 15,716 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 291 TV-40 The south side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Milliken Ave to Mountain View Dr. Ground Cover area: 11,630 square feet Hardscape area: 19,738 square feet TV-41 The paseo east of Milliken Ave from Terra Vista Pkwy south to Mountain View Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,081 square feet Hardscape area: 9,640 square feet TV-42 The north side of Mountain View Dr from Terra Vista Pkwy to 250 feet east of Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,994 square feet Hardscape area: 14,777 square feet TV-43 Church St median and parkway from Malaga Dr to Terra Vista Pkwy. Ground Cover area: 7,506 square feet Hardscape area: 3,955 square feet TV-44 The south side of Church St from Terra Vista Pkwy to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,400 square feet Hardscape area: 7,606 square feet TV-45 The west side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Malaga Dr. Ground cover area: 20,693 square feet Hardscape area: 12,450 square feet TV-46 The north side of Malaga Dr from Church St to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 19,843 square feet Hardscape area: 18,000 square feet TV-47 The east side of Terra Vista Pkwy from Church St to Brandywine PI. The paseo from Brandywine PI to Bunker Hill Dr. The east side of Radcliff PI from Bunker Hill Dr to Malaga Dr. Ground Cover area: 17,838 square feet Hardscape area: 9,023 square feet TV-48 The Church St median from 750 feet east of Milliken Ave to Malaga Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,554 square feet Hardscape area: 9,698 square feet FH-1 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Haven Ave. Ground Cover area: 4,571 square feet This median contains 9,142 square feet of landscape with 4,571 square feet maintained by LMD 4-R with the remainder maintained by LMD 3B. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 292 FH-2 The Foothill Blvd median from Spruce Ave to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 7,940 square feet This median contains 15,880 square feet of landscape with 7,940 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 3B. FH-5 The Foothill Blvd median from 360 feet west of Masi Dr to 516 feet west of Masi Dr. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet This median contains 1,600 square feet of landscape with 800 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 3B. FH-6 The Foothill Blvd median from Masi Dr Plaza to Rochester Ave. Ground Cover area: 800 square feet This median contains 1,600; square feet of landscape with 800 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 3B. H-5 The Haven Ave median from Foothill Blvd to Church St. Ground Cover area: 11,502 square feet This median contains 23,004 square feet of landscape with 11,502 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 3B. H-6 Haven Ave median from Church St to Base Line Rd. Ground Cover area: 9,615 square feet Converted 8,708 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the City's General Fund. H-7 The Haven Ave median from Base Line Rd to Southern Pacific railroad tracks. Ground Cover area: 3,130 square feet Converted 3,992 sq. ft. of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Removed 3,692 sq. ft. of ground cover for turn pocket expansion. Area listed is the 50% maintained by the District. An equal amount is maintained by the City's General Fund. VG-14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. Ground Cover area: 9,169 square feet This median contains 18,338 square feet of landscape with 9,169 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 2. VG-15 The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. Ground Cover area: 3,960 square feet This median contains 7,920 square feet of landscape with 3,960 square feet maintained by LIVID 4-R with the remainder maintained by LIVID 2. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 293 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 294 TI r �• v v Q --„I2-------------- r' City of Rancho Cucamonga v I• I` Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R CD TV10 ! m RAC �Tv11 Irrigation Sites N *f '� ry (D i{ Base Line Rd fV Cl N1— N2 TVs= TV4— -- -- i i • • '� n TV32 -MO (D 0 ij TV5 i F TV5--,TV34 TV44 4 n TV24 r_ f •TV34 • TV19 '+ TVs _ p W TV41 L z d + TV26 • �15#3 Z O I N25'ti f5 �BrC3 #TV 15 'I TV39 TV42TV3 TV18 qj f / ■ TV27 TV14� T1!l i _ }�N^13� iT�V33 *TV28 TV29 ■ lV7 f TV36 O i iTV23 ■TV38 TV44 t— i 0, N76 TV y TV47 ■ TV22 /fVi3V D ■ TV45 • 1 O TV48 N46 I C) • TV31 j � ■ `TV21 i N20 O 7 � 1 Foothill BI Legend D n ■ Water Meters �= ine rtga.data.and gapnahk h%nudkn a Lmk by and t}v.upr me Oqr d Aarxh.Qa� are mver� a pu61t--.f W— ff-nreCrn. ine0Y&AA. �n�nak. —anm,.P Q,aa�ee ■ Irrigation Rumps CD .;m> �•ar .a�,.r. �ae�,r�«n.dme� f ar,p ,m.. m —dad ad y—neon. Th.—dram n i h up-. Llvn�br fa any rmsm Nz " a d^ m rdm denuy wrir a� mf�am p—vad neon Irrigation Lines CD--q lne Cey d k�dw nrcnorga a Okmy am-dtl Ir.e dm m arty and al Ul ;pr s and 1. ry.kxt r urn�t.Lk nnplkd wamra— n.��4 and f� apar,a.ar papme.Tra oK m�c� Miles rg -- abf serer.� �r y uedinc r rdi of me imam for(q m I--J LM D 4-R roe ..ems e�n a>a in aminmr—u arz nm01) m 2 0.2 0.1 Q 0.2 L � an+*hp iry permre pon Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 296 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 683,480 Overtime Salaries 1,050 Part-time Salaries 33,610 Fringe Benefits 350,130 Subtotal - Personnel 1,068,270 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 80,810 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 6,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,700 Emergency Operations & Maintenance 5,750 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 94,260 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 654,270 Tree Maintenance 74,970 Subtotal - Contract Services 729,240 Utilities: Water Utilities 477,240 Electric Utilities 19,820 Subtotal - Utilities 497,060 Assessment Administration 20,980 Admin./General Overhead 257,850 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,599,390 Capital Expenditures: Captial Project 700,000 Total Expenditures Budget $ 3,367,660 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 297 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,772,040 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 10,750 Subtotal - Taxes 2,782,790 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 79,250 Park Maintenance Fees 490 Sports Field User Group Rentals 110 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 79,850 Total Revenues Budget 2,862,640 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (505,020) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,799,659.11 Total District EBU Count 7,049.32 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 397.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 482.44 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on December 2, 2009, voted in favor of a Prop 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 7,027,980 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (505,020) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 6,522,960 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 298 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 299 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 300 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are incidental general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the control of dust and insect infestations, and • the visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District. However, it has been determined that these benefits are incidental and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Any incidental benefit received by parcels outside of the District is further offset by the incidental benefit received by parcels within the District from the maintenance of landscaping improvements by the other assessment districts within the City. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 301 Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009, Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this District. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XI II D and Proposition 218. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 2,651 single family parcels within the District which represents 69.1 percent of the total assessable parcels within the District. A method has been developed to convert other land uses to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land- use), and size of the property, as compared to a single family residential parcel. Other residential land uses are assigned Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single- family parcel. Based upon the trip generation data from the ITE Trip Generation Report, San Diego Association of Governments' Guide to Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates which have been adopted by San Bernardino County Transpiration Authority (formerly known as San Bernardino Associated Governments) and the most recent census data for the City of Rancho Cucamonga, condominiums are assigned 0.80 EDU's since the number of residents and number of trips generated per dwelling unit are 80 percent of the typical single family residence. Multi-family residential units are assigned 0.70 EDU's per dwelling unit since the number of residents and number of trips generated per multifamily residential unit are 70 percent of the typical single-family residential unit. This reduction is further supported by virtue of the fact that both condominium developments and multi-family residential development have a higher level of landscaping that reduce the benefit received by these parcels from District maintained landscaping. EBU's are assigned to Commercial and Industrial parcels based upon the number of trips generated as well. The ITE Trip Generation Report shows that non-residential uses similar to those found in the District generate from 30 to 400 plus trips per day based upon the specific land use. An average trip generation rate of 135 trips per day was used since the non-residential uses within the district are generally those that result in fewer trips per day per acre, when compared Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 302 to more intense non-residential uses such as community shopping centers which can generate in excess of 500 trips per day. Based upon an average density of approximately 9 single family residential units per acre and a trip generation rate of 10 trips per day for a typical single family residential unit, the trip generation rate for commercial and industrial parcels is approximately 1.5 times that of an acre developed for single family residential use based upon an average of 135 trips per acre for non-residential uses. The trips generated by non-residential uses has been reduced by approximately 40 percent to account for the number of "pass-by" trips which are those trips which stop at non-residential parcels enroute to/from residential parcels. This reduces the trips generated per acre from 135 to 81. Since non-residential parcels do not receive a significant special benefit from the park facilities maintained by the District, the number of trips generated per acre has been further reduced in proportion to the ratio of expenditures for landscape maintenance versus park maintenance within the District, which has been estimated by the City to be 60% parks and 40% landscaping. Therefore, commercial and industrial parcels have been assigned a value of 3.25 EBU's per acre to represent the special benefit received by those parcels relative to the typical single-family residential parcel. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Condominium 0.80 Unit Multi-Family Residential 0.70 Unit Commercial/Industrial 3.25 Acre Vacant (incl. all undevelped property) 0.25 Acre Schools 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 303 based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $482.44 $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 Condominium $482.44 397.15 1,249.00 999.20 Multi-Family Residential $482.44 397.15 4,001.00 2,800.70 Commercial/Industrial $482.44 397.15 176.40 573.30 Vacant(incl. all undevelped property) $482.44 397.15 61.08 15.27 Schools 1 $482.44 397.15 35.41 8.85 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2010/11, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.5% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside — San Bernardino — Ontario Consumer Price Index area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2021/22 will remain at $397.15 per single family residence. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 304 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #04 Page 305 1l r City of Rancho Cucamonga v 32 Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R. m � �r-ti m E 2 6 �, Y Nm RANCHO ; _ _ _ (Terra Vista Planned Community) � ; i �_ ; iur•uuu��i�r���u�rll�l uu� uui r�lrrrrr�^rF fr�r�rr IMIM Irna1M1MIWIru MIMI=INl Ml.'~ N (D + j 7 N Hillside Rd m p 1 Wilson Av w - � Fn' 0. Banyan St •. rr Z O i +m. 19th St+ + a' n ! � `< Base Line Rd =� O fFoothii�ll ine Rd v IF D i n ° Foothill BI B1 n c 0 v Arrow Rt Arrow Rt o i v 8th St M, % v6d, Sf Legend lq D v U9 __ 4th Sty 4th 5t ^D Tue Rape,dam,erd peoprephk rdurnamo c'�rrQ,r��,•y a [M[M!b,son e...ph 7 7 City LiE77Et5 l/ —6qr of P.-k 6mm pare p—..!d as a Wbl1 grd rEorriatlrn. } i M F- LM D 4-R (Q m fa+h— rr shots«x 2+r upon vz Llonra>:,f«aRv ra.Q., ar a rtueled m Fd p d-Uy,�dy arM ana er J dcrR pesr�d he,ev. _ ul C CD Ill ,�UY a P—ho nra,wrga aVky aw m&d Una n dC m arn'and sW — E N 06 WZ -poa s wd wam� is Ing,Ere r nm�7 t%dK impIW wmre N i 2 W p� a,edaaeee�and �ra"rc �page.rnm orverrar,d, c—mom, 2 V �k�lieS ,iur a�rr�c e�n.r amurx env�,eamc regabns ef u,e m�aa,rar{q an+ Q l; itT'ar>taa,s«Ina�rr�In ary Iafa,ra prudes-df-(1)-T O N RadwR o.31"e-m—y persmo baRo aP—u trdcmueon e�imue xbn -P CJl ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $397.15 2,652.00 2,652.00 $1,053,241.80 Condominium 397.15 1,249.00 999.20 396,832.28 Multi-Family Residential 397.15 4,001.00 2,800.70 1,112,318.01 Commercial/Industrial 397.15 176.40 573.30 227,686.54 Vacant(incl. all undevelped property) 397.15 61.08 15.27 6,064.63 Schools 397.15 35.41 8.85 3,515.85 Totals i 8,174.89 7,049.32 $2,799,659.11 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#04 Page 307 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) Page 308 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (ANDOVER) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 309 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 General Benefit 11 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 310 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2020, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 (Andover) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 2,990 Operations and Maintenance 5,380 Total Expenditures Budget 8,370 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 2,500 Other Revenues 340 Total Revenues Budget 2,840 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (5,530) Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 113.29 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #05 Page 311 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #05 Page 312 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 313 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City bounded by Hermosa Ave on the west, 26th St on the south, the parcels north of and along Bedford Dr and the parcels west of and along Andover PI. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble- shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 314 ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Andover Tot Lot. Site # Descriptive Location 1-1-5 The Andover PI playground on the southwest corner of Andover PI and Bedford Dr. Ground Cover area: 1,506 square feet Turf area: 1,070 square feet Hardscape area: 640 square feet Andover and landscaping are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #05 Page 315 TI r �• v Q City of Rancho Cucamonga 0 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 v m CUCA cur_a.MICHo _ Irrigation Sites a�:ra - N � O p� N m N n 0 Z C l J r-t 0 T� N D n — 0 n 1 w 0 c ' w I F Legend I > —� • Water Meters y irrigation Lines Tk nn pa,dam.arti y.,g.ok tihnnaun ei '1 nadl�k by ana n.« `, the Cy d F—z.C—g.—F—a e puuc emu—d rV,ad nknmum. -0= The Oty d P.r 0--n—W make—nrple:m war M nepr�x+latlon a wam me 0 City Parcels a m e cn�C m*u ,gym.•m kwn=«nrtdircs of wry Lfvrtodon �Q —d m�vu h—, R�—dvaa not mk upon de himrot�f«mr amxa - m a.d s m w�- ohm aka Tot Lot The Uy d ks C—y e goknq 1d wx mo[Iwsnon as m a Taand ail W ram Z roenlaC.+a wd 1�L1n�ry I ,tat=kmMd t%tee nnol d n1 d n�anwp a Aa—f«a p.Me r ounce.ns at,d ftdn eum Mlles -- LM d 3he1 netic a mr a�urr�any d bIN reFrd�d u mums for(Q anf it �� a lnaav�a In,infonrauoo pr Hi a d�411)"�« O.E)2 6.01 6 0.02 I-- Q namoo omx"�m arty pt—munm upon v ldct t—awls Haan - ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 1,990 Fringe Benefits 1,000 Subtotal - Personnel 2,990 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 1,300 Vehicle Operations and Maintenance 70 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,370 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 1,820 Utilities: Water Utilities 900 Electric Utilities 200 Subtotal - Utilities 1,100 Assessment Administration 240 Admin./General Overhead 850 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 5,380 Total Expenditures Budget $ 8,370 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #05 Page 317 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 2,500 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 340 Total Revenues Budget 2,840 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (5,530) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 2,492.60 Total District EBU Count 44.00 Actual Assessment per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 56.65 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 113.29 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 26,462 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (5,530) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 20,932 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 318 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 319 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 320 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the Andover Tot Lot at Andover and Bedford and include landscaping (includes ground cover only) and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 321 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined. On December 2, 2009 Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase was approved by the property owners in this district. Therefore, all parcels included in the District boundary, are being levied in accordance with Article XIII D and Proposition 218. A single-family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 322 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $113.29 $56.65 44.00 44.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. The Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment rate will remain at $56.65 per Single Family Residence. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#05 Page 323 -n r �• v v City of Rancho Cucamonga m ¢ _ Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 v RANCHO y E t } Y N CUCAfMNGn (Andover) CD ■r.�.ur.�.r.rrr.l.rrlrl.� 1.1.E ur.r 1.1=r.r.1WrF m A N j (D } ;N =3 Hillside Rd ! • c m a 1 Wilson Av i � ■� w ' Banyan 5t It �- r r--t Z , ICn WWI _ 19th St } Base Line Rd �* Base Line Rd D f.4 0 o C Foothill BI Foo thill BI 0 v 0 Arrow Rt Arrow Rt v 8t1� St � �, ; > +{ D Q m6th S� Legend y �f 5 4th 5t' 4th StS I City Limits (� Im Its,mm,mn ga.grnphk rfpmlalpn f'lrfvar ')"UMIc by AM n qh p r r up �} PAr.r.r16 ar p.—Oda pblt--a�d y m d mp —w.rrxtn a < � w tl 1—d LIVID 5 cQ o (D m m afY s^F ana aY ]doneom � haen _ C WZ 7n Cq d lmrvro CL w p mokM am wWl IMCff6 p arras"and aA E �} ro 2pnsi .and--- - 'n ng,ba rd Hm t,dr.Implied t�imnbe q1 >_ �� a nedamary ad rem k«a prmaarpa .M. alxd P— n cumn� _ 41 w �4�1i25 yy skier nad.Q ate.nor assure any Il.dlry;negard�d ae mumuon for(I)eW v. 2 +' I d.5 a 1 ter} enpl;orr.sslms a Inaxvratle In 1.m Infmmrl>rr pradW argrQ LII)aIy�an 12 Q i�—Mrig d n m any pe rearm upon Me Vrfnenlam —IL herein. (.n ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $56.65 44.00 44.00 $2,492.60 Totals 1 1 44.001 44.001 $2,492.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #05 Page 325 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) Page 326 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6-11 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 327 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 9 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 11 District Budget 11 Definitions of Budget Items 12 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 14 Overview 14 General Benefit 15 Special Benefit 15 Method of Assessment Spread 16 Cost of Living Inflator 17 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 18 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 20 Assessment Roll 20 Annexations 20 Page 328 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 21,240 Operations and Maintenance 598,870 Capital Expenditures 51,120 Total Expenditures Budget 671,230 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 548,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 5,310 Subtotal - Taxes 554,180 Other Revenues 8,690 Transfer In 40,090 Total Revenues Budget 602,960 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (68,270) Total District EBU Count 1,199.84 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 462.07 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 462.07 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 329 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 330 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 331 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan St, west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Ave and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 & 13858 west of Milliken Ave. Zone 1 is the area generally located west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave. Zone 2 is the area generally located east of Rochester Ave and west of Milliken Ave. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 332 and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location CC-1 The southside of Banyan St from 1290 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The west side of Milliken Ave median from Banyan St to 292 south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 96,892 square feet Turf area: 17,945 square feet Hardscape area: 13,944 square feet CC-3 The paseo on the west side of Morning PI from Morning PI to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 2,801 square feet Turf area: 124 square feet Hardscape area: 4,609 square feet CC-4 The west side of Morning PI, from Banyan St to Starview Pl. The north side of Starview PI, from Morning PI to Starview PI. Ground Cover area: 14,273 square feet Turf Cover area: 5,513 square feet Hardscape area: 5,000 square feet CC-5 Silver Sun Ln paseo from the end of Silver Sun Ln cul-de-sac to Deer Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 25,890 square feet Turf area: 12,084 square feet Hardscape area: 1,350 square feet CC-6 The east and west side of Netherlands View Loop from Vintage Dr to Vintage Dr. The Netherlands View Loop paseo from Netherlands View Loop to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 88,902 square feet Turf area: 676 square feet Hardscape area: 23,650 square feet CC-7 The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Mt Rainier Ct to Kettle Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,930 square feet Turf area: 6,318 square feet Hardscape area: 12,236 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 333 CC-8 The paseo from Hillview Loop to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 42,107 square feet Hardscape area: 22,752 square feet Hardscape area: 4,089 square feet CC-9 The south side of Vintage Dr from 250 feet west of Hillview Loop to Hillview Loop. The west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr to Kettle Peak PI. The west side of Kettle Peak PI from Hillview Loop to Donner Pass Ct. The east side of Hillview Loop from Kettle Peak PI to Tioga Peak Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,334 square feet Turf area: 4,954 square feet Hardscape area: 9,088 square feet CC-10 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr to Butler Peak PI. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Rainbow Falls Ct to Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 24,603 square feet Hardscape area: 10,760 square feet CC-11 The paseo from Caryn School to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from the paseo to Rochester Ave. The east and west side of Mt Baldy PI from Banyan St to Sierra Crest View Loop. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct to Woodland Ct. Ground Cover area: 47,507 square feet Turf area: 7,810 square feet Hardscape area: 7,825 square feet CC-12 The separation paseo from Vintage Dr to Pinnacle Peak Ct. Ground Cover area: 50,325 square feet Turf area: 15,021 square feet Hardscape area: 7,675 square feet CC-13 The east side of Hillview Loop from Tioga Peak Ct to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr from Hillview Loop to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Vintage Dr from Hillview Loop to Caryn School. The east side of Terrace View Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 26,162 square feet Turf area: 4,508 square feet Hardscape area: 12,928 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 334 CC-14 The east side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Waverly Ct to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr from Sierra Crest View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt Wilson Ct. The south side of Vintage Dr from Netherlands View Loop to 330 feet west of Netherlands View Loop. Ground Cover area: 73,250 square feet Turf area: 16,525 square feet Hardscape area: 9,885 square feet CC-15 The south side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Waverly Ct to Mt Cambridge Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Cambridge Ct to Woodland Ct. The north side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Hilltop Ct to Caryn School. The Sierra Crest View Loop paseo from Sierra Crest View Loop to Mt Sherman Ct. Ground Cover area: 70,990 square feet Turf area: 7,699 square feet Hardscape area: 20,055 square feet CC-16 The south side of Vintage Dr from Netherlands View Loop to Rochester Ave. The north side of Vintage Dr from Rochester Ave to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Sierra Crest View Loop from Mt Wilson Ct to Mt Cambridge Ct. The Netherlands View Loop Paseo from Vintage Dr to Mt Sterling Ct. Ground Cover area: 77,202 square feet Turf area: 3,954 square feet Hardscape area: 18,195 square feet CC-17 The east side of Milliken Ave from Vintage Dr to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 13,740 square feet Turf area: 9,088 square feet Hardscape area: 6,460 square feet CC-18 The north side of Vintage Dr from Milliken Ave to Hillview Loop. The south side of Vintage Dr from 104 feet west of Hillview Loop to Milliken Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,287 square feet Turf area: 3,889 square feet Hardscape area: 11,188 square feet CC-19 The Terrace View Loop paseo from Vintage Dr to Terrace View Loop. Ground Cover area: 17,469 square feet Turf area: 15,617 square feet Hardscape area: 2,736 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 335 CC-20 The east side of Terrace View Loop from Mt San Antonio Ct to El Capitan Ct. The west side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI to Mt San Antonio Ct. Ground Cover area: 20,627 square feet Hardscape area: 20,017 square feet Hardscape area: 7,888 square feet CC-21 The west side of Rochester Ave from Banyan St to 317 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 31,292 square feet CC-22 The south side of Vintage Dr from Terrace View Loop to Sierra Crest View Loop. The east and west side of Hillview Loop from Vintage Dr to Mt Rainier Ct. Ground Cover area: 11,609 square feet Turf area: 3,763 square feet Hardscape area: 6,524 square feet CC-23 The south side of Banyan St from Milliken Ave to Butler Peak Pl. The west side of Butler Peak PI from Banyan St to Terrace View Loop. The north side of Terrace View Loop from Butler Peak PI to Rainbow Falls Ct. Ground Cover area: 12,132 square feet Hardscape area: 528 square feet CC-24 The north side of Terrace View Loop from El Capitan Ct to Butler Peak PI. The east side of Butler Peak PI from Terrace View Loop to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Butler Peak PI to 990 feet east of Butler Peak PI. Ground Cover area: 14,452 square feet Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet CC-26 The east side of Rochester Ave from 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The north and south side of Vintage Dr from Rochester Ave to Thunder Mountain Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from 317 feet south of Vintage Dr to the 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 35,037 square feet Hardscape area: 19,779 square feet CC-27 The Milliken Ave median and the west side of Milliken Ave from 292 feet south of Vintage Dr to 210 freeway. Ground Cover area: 13,365 square feet Hardscape area: 12,300 square feet CC-28 The east side of Milliken Ave from Vintage Dr to the 210 freeway right-of-way. Ground Cover area: 17,724 square feet Cobble area: 2,387 square feet Hardscape area: 5,810 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 336 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 337 -n r �• v v Q City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. G-R m RANCHO Irrigation Sites CD N CDC N m a 0 Banyan St —C C23------ — --.. 0. I • ■ O i CC4 CC1 CC1T / •CC10 —� CC15 I • • f CC20 CC3 CC19 1 'n CC1 • Ir � I • �� _I/ CC13 f � I CC22 CC14 0 •Ci 8 •CC13 i 1 / CC21 � (J CC 16 D n • CC8 L + 0 j I C C26 • f 0 � CC27 •CC28 � �CC7 CC12 / 0 I • Ir CC9 CC 6 0 1 * � ^ 7 t--CC5 _ D � r l/> Legend -0= the nags,data,arti¢nyraphk rlarnawn ClrMes ') by and tlaouyh me Cxy d P—ha Ormmorap are peserXd a pubis nspunpc d¢rad Hornream. he OtVof P.r [srm ne.ad—--Vl rn nrarrartr,r uan mq�emrt« # Water Meters a:m Me ma+L a•.pe:a,wear-.a�o�n—«WWI—d arty Livnvnan CD m zvrded m Tnu lades Ste—�n t-d upon Me hlun�tn far any reb— wz = m w � � r ��, � he r, Irrigation Lines wz Ih Cry k—fn 9unorga a ok"am wdhn IYntr dhrie any rrd A _p�and m ntaq Ind r4,L"=Owed$to Implku �e l d rrmrdrartdrq wd fines F,r a part ar a—e.rre oq or rndn eumn—p amr nether a�npr ae=,.ne any Wa��,�ardkm Q� Ibr(l)am Miles LIVID 5R l a y ads In an lnro m p a.de a d m�)ay awn« 0.1 0-05 0 0-1 J o ram--**w me m aiy perzre nsornm upon ve hrtmneuon aralhue nedn Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 339 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 12,490 Part Time Salaries 1,970 Fringe Benefits 6,780 Subtotal - Personnel 21,240 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 7,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 7,700 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 296,460 Tree Maintenance 50,000 Subtotal - Contract Services 346,460 Utilities: Water Utilities 193,120 Electric Utilities 4,120 Subtotal - Utilities 197,240 Assessment Administration 6,680 Admin./General Overhead 40,790 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 598,870 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Equipment 1,120 Captial Project 50,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 51,120 Total Expenditures Budget $ 671,230 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 340 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 548,870 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 5,310 Subtotal - Taxes 554,180 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 8,690 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 40,090 Total Revenues Budget 602,960 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (68,270) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 554,408.92 Total District EBU Count 1,199.84 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 462.07 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 462.07 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the property owners on September 1, 2010, voted in favor of a Proposition 218 assessment ballot increase with an allowable annual increase by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 606,750 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2020/22 (68,270) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 538,480 Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 341 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 342 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 343 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 344 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. Vacant parcels are assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre because they receive a lesser benefit from the improvements until such time as development occurs. Publicly owned school parcels are also assigned an EBU value of 0.25 EBU's per acre in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements which are provided for the use and benefit of the residential units within the District, and the benefit conferred upon other parcels within the District by the open space and landscaping maintained by the School District on their parcels which might be used by properties within the District under joint use agreements between the School District and the City. There are two benefit zones within the District: Zone 1 and Zone 2. Parcels in Zone 2 are assigned 0.75 EBU per dwelling unit due to the reduction in special benefit they receive as a result of their location relative to the majority of the improvements maintained by the District. Zone 2 parcels are on the far east and west side of the District. Therefore, parcels within Zone 2 do not receive the same special benefit from the improvements due to their proximity, as parcels within Zone 1 which are assigned 1.00 EBU per dwelling unit and are generally located adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 345 Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential -Zone 1 1.00 Parcel Single Family Residential -Zone 2 0.75 Parcel School 0.25 Acre Undeveloped 0.25 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential-Zone 1 $462.07 $462.07 964.00 964.00 Single Family Residential-Zone 2 462.07 462.07 310.00 232.50 School 462.07 462.07 5.35 1.34 Undeveloped 462.07 462.07 0.00 0.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning Fiscal Year 2011/12, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3.0% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside — San Bernardino — Ontario Consumer Price Index area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#06 Page 346 such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2021/22 will increase from $451.92 to $462.07 per single-family residence zone 1 and from $338.94 to $346.55 per single family residence zone 2, a CPI increase of 3.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2020/21. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 347 Tr r 0 City of Rancho Cucamonga � 32 Landscape Maintenance District No. G-R NCUCAmOH° : 4 - {Caryn Planned Community rQ �_ ; ■a.a.uua.a.r.r.r.rrlrl■I 1■1■. uaar •.YrY1.1Ae1rF flair Y.Y.1.1=1-1a.e W..Y■IY■1-6Y.Y�l.e N j CD �c N 1 N =3 Hillside Rd ! ! M 1 m 1 Wilson Av CV _ w - Banyan St ' s+ r4 z ' o � _ rn ' 19th 5t+ n � * m `< Base Line Rd Ft o Base Line Rd D n Foothill BI Foothill BI n c 0 a) Arrow Rt A row Rt o i f ath St ; Legend � � �. Y.e.Y: �I.I.1■ i ��■�■�YYi City Limits v th S LMD G-R Zones D 4th St' 4th St Zone 1 The Hop,dam.and p-paphk Ff«rndbn a L� I-by and rh«ph �n m�cxvdP.—f—.apoa.aaap.uc��a�d`r«m.— Q d _ neon.faan�o�n maa=ze., �.ranke,.rara.e am,d =r h or nndircs d of lri rrlm M n Zane 2 xvrldd m Tvu fayen. Te d ft-,r. upon Jr Limr�m f am= 47 4 J � sd a mre�m edQe�dmW rerfy arty and aY irM.vnm�� hnerr. F- O the Cq d fiardm Qrar W o¢Ik"am wmhi IMle n dWoM¢arty and.I w �pmvi..eyne and mmrdQ In !i, Mftd T4 the Im m rrrtandea QJ L S ,� a,e deep and Fb—[«a.a ria�,—n. a y.f F—d.e�n�, Qp yhaY nerr,Q. ro,aa,r„,•.nr a.G1eti rq rd , f me—b—hr errors rn�rs«Inamrr�In enl Infra p—WM arq�a(.)"d-arxr« {1 O N roman�*w ar,•m arrr pvso,c ire up—,k hrhr —a.1—rxien O O ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential -Zone 1 $462.07 966.00 966.00 $446,359.62 Single Family Residential -Zone 2 $462.07 310.00 232.50 $107,431.28 School $462.07 5.35 1.34 $618.02 Undeveloped $462.07 0.00 0.00 $0.00 Totals 1,281.35 1,199.84 $554,408.92 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R— City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #06 Page 349 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Page 350 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 351 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 11 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 13 District Budget 13 Definitions of Budget Items 15 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 16 Overview 16 General Benefit 17 Special Benefit 17 Method of Assessment Spread 18 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 19 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 21 Assessment Roll 21 Annexations 21 Page 352 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 235,080 Operations and Maintenance 1,015,750 Capital Expenditures 103,350 Total Expenditures Budget 1,354,180 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 939,910 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 11,540 Subtotal -Taxes 951,450 Other Revenues 61,890 Total Revenues Budget 1,013,340 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (340,840) Total District EBU Count 3,092.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 307.05 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 353 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 354 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 355 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by the 210 Freeway on the south, 1-15 Freeway on the west, and City limits on the north and east. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of the paseos, parkways, median islands, street trees, parks, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 356 replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Etiwanda Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location EN-1 The north side of Wilson Ave from San Sevaine Rd to Ridgeline PI. The east side of Ridgeline PI from Wilson Ave to Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 27,325 square feet Turf area: 19,334 square feet Hardscape area: 840 square feet EN-2 The Metropolitan Water District easement on the south side of Crescenta Way from San Marino Way to Ridgeline Pl. Ground Cover area: 38,104 square feet Turf area: 41,250 square feet Hardscape area: 9,000 square feet EN-3 The Wilson Ave median from Wardman Bullock Rd to San Sevaine Rd. Ground Cover area: 9,016 square feet Hardscape area: 11,088 square feet EN-4 The Planters on the north side of the drainage easement that is between and parallel to Highland Ave and Arapaho Rd from Etiwanda Ave east to the end. Ground Cover area: 63,972 square feet EN-5 The south side of Wilson Ave from 1,115 feet west of San Sevaine Rd to 205 feet east of San Sevaine Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from Wilson Ave to Young's Canyon Rd. Ground Cover area: 45,584 square feet Turf area: 3,527 square feet EN-6 The north side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to Ridgeline PI. The west side of Ridgeline PI from Wilson Ave to 120 feet north of Arcadia Way. Ground Cover area: 29,226 square feet Turf area: 15,136 square feet Hardscape area: 1,300 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 357 EN-7 The parkway on the eastside of Wardman Bullock Rd from Wilson Ave to 857 feet north of Glendora Dr. The cobblestone between the tract wall and the flood wall will be handled for debris pickup and weed control on an as needed basis. Ground Cover area: 10,268 square feet Hardscape area: 31,549 square feet EN-8 The south side of Crescenta Way from Ridgeline PI to Crestline PI. Ground Cover area: 50,305 square feet Turf area: 35,960 square feet Hardscape area: 10,000 square feet EN-9 The paseo from Meadowbrook Ct to Rock Creek Rd. Ground Cover area: 1,400 square feet Turf area: 6,555 square feet Hardscape area: 2,820 square feet EN-10 The paseo from Etiwanda Ave to Pacific Crest PI. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from 175 feet north of N Rim Way to 171 feet south of Golden Prairie Dr. Ground Cover area: 49,020 square feet Turf area: 4,445 square feet Hardscape area: 13,026 square feet EN-11 The paseo south of Ridgecrest Dr to southern boundary of Tract 14139. This site is temporarily maintained by another contractor and was deleted from the contract as of July 16, 2001; however, this site is still the City's property. Ground Cover area: 3,548 square feet Turf area: 800 square feet Hardscape area: 4,280 square feet EN-12 The cul-de-sac on the north side of Ridgecrest Dr at Etiwanda Creek Channel. Ground Cover area: 1,870 square feet Turf area: 700 square feet Hardscape area: 450 square feet EN-13 The north side of Wilson Ave from 574 feet west of Cherry Ave to the channel east of San Sevaine Rd. The Wilson Ave median from Cherry Ave to San Sevaine Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from Wilson Ave to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 46,611 square feet Turf area: 5,037 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 358 EN-14 The west side of San Sevaine Rd from 150 feet north of Wilson Ave to 136 feet north of Crescenta Way. Ground Cover area: 55,166 square feet Turf area: 235 square feet Hardscape area: 6,975 square feet EN-15 The north side of Young's Canyon Rd from 500 feet east of Koch PI to 692 feet west of Koch PI. The south side of Young's Canyon Rd from 349 feet east of Koch PI to 692 feet west of Koch PI. The east and west side of Koch PI place from Young's Canyon Rd to 132 feet north of Young's Canyon Rd. The west side of Koch PI from Young's Canyon Rd to 132 feet south of Young's Canyon Rd. The east side of Koch PI from 82 feet south of Young's Canyon Rd to Young's Canyon Rd. The trailhead north east of the east end of Young's Canyon Rd to the south end of San Sevaine Rd Horse Trail. The south end of San Sevaine Rd Horse from the trail head to 254 feet north of trailhead. Ground Cover area: 42,925 square feet Hardscape area: 14,308 square feet EN-16 The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from 225 feet south of San Segundo Dr to 80 feet north of Dona Way. Ground Cover area: 2,056 square feet Hardscape area: 3,450 square feet EN-17 The north side of Colonbero Rd from San Sevaine Rd Channel to Guidera Dr. The south side of Colonbero Rd from San Sevaine Rd Channel to 400 feet north of Guidera Dr. The north side of Aggazzotti Rd from Colonbero Rd to 475 feet east of Colonbero Rd. This site has a pump which will be adjusted and maintained by City personnel. Ground Cover area: 43,241 square feet Hardscape area: 29,125 square feet EN-18 The north side of Aggazzotti Rd from San Antonio Dr to San Sevaine Rd. The west side of San Sevaine Rd from Aggazzotti Rd to 702 feet south of Aggazzotti Rd. The east side of San Sevaine Rd from 702 feet south of Aggazzotti Rd to Regina Dr. Ground Cover area: 47,823 square feet Hardscape area: 30,986 square feet EN-19 The south side of Wilson Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 45,727 square feet Hardscape area: 19,229 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 359 EN-20 The south side of Wilson Ave form Bluegrass Ave to Estates Way. Ground Cover area: 85,155 square feet Hardscape area: 48,784 square feet EN-21 The north side of Wilson Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Cervantes PI. The Wilson Ave median from Etiwanda Ave to Cervantes Pl. The westside of Etiwanda Ave from Wilson Ave to Del Norte PI. Ground Cover area: 88,795 square feet Hardscape area: 27,128 square feet EN-22 The north and south side of Vintage Dr from 165 feet east of Countrywood PI to 338 feet west of Countrywood PI. Ground Cover area: 13,603 square feet Hardscape area: 7,365 square feet EN-23 The north side of Wilson Ave and median from Etiwanda Ave west to Etiwanda Ave. The east side of Etiwanda Ave from Wilson Ave to 1150 feet north of Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 32,027 square feet Hardscape area: 29,567 square feet EN-24 The north side of Vintage Dr from 360 feet west of Ascot PI to 230 feet east of Countrywood PI. The south side of Vintage Dr from Ascot PI to 500 feet east of Countrywood PI. Ground Cover area: 34,707 square feet Hardscape area: 92,600 square feet EN-25 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from Banyan St to 610 feet north of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 4,054 square feet Hardscape area: 5,819 square feet EN-26 The south side of Banyan St from Bluegrass Ave to Greenwood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,240 square feet Hardscape area: 3,200 square feet EN-27 The south side of Banyan St from Laurel Blossom PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 1,703 square feet Hardscape area: 8,417 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 360 EN-28 The north side of Wilson Ave from Cervantes PI to 1715 feet west of Cervantes PI. The west side of Cervantes PI from Carmel Knolls Dr to Wilson Ave. The paseo from Wilson Ave to Tejas Ct. The median on Wilson Ave from Cervantes PI to Bluegrass Ave. The following temporary landscape: There is one planter on the west side of Altura Dr at Tejas Ct. There are five planters on the south side of Tejas Ct from Altura Dr to 195 feet east of Altura Dr. Ground Cover area: 25,048 square feet Hardscape area: 22,532 square feet EN-29 The south side of Banyan St from 787 feet west of East Ave to East Ave. The west side of East Ave from Banyan St to 600 feet south of Blue Gum. The east side of East Ave from Banyan St to 537 feet south of Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 16,111 square feet Hardscape area: 15,774 square feet EN-30 The east side of Bluegrass Ave from 257 feet south of Churchill Dr to 418 feet north of Churchill Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,303 square feet Hardscape area: 5,302 square feet EN-31 The south side of Banyan St from 375 feet south of Cashew Way to Rose Way. The north side of Banyan St from 435 feet west of Peak PI to Wardman Bullock Rd. Ground Cover area: 53,000 square feet Hardscape area: 26,855 square feet EN-32 The landscaping south of the equestrian trail from 210 feet west of Grovewood PI to 1,170 feet east of Grovewood PI. Ground Cover area: 6,900 square feet EN-33 The north side of Young's Canyon Rd from 600 feet east of Banyan St to Banyan St. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Banyan St to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to 635 feet east of Fields PI. Ground Cover area: 66,601 square feet Hardscape area: 46,332 square feet EN-34 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Parkview Way from Wardman Bullock Rd to Soledad Way. Ground Cover area: 67,021 square feet Hardscape area: 34,045 square feet EN-35 The north side of Day Creek Blvd from Etiwanda Ave to Indian Wells PI. Ground Cover area: 160,737 square feet Hardscape area: 128,254 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 361 EN-36 The south side of Day Creek Blvd from 380 feet north of Coyote Dr to Etiwanda Ave. The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 170 feet north of N Rim Way. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 380 feet north of Coyote Dr to Indian Wells PI. Ground Cover area: 58,398 square feet Hardscape area: 68,127 square feet EN-37 The east side of East Ave from 235 feet south of Hunt Club Dr to 375 feet north of Hunt Club Dr. Ground Cover area: 5,559 square feet Hardscape area: 5,231 square feet EN-38 The west side of East Ave from 236 feet north of Philly Dr to 245 feet south of Philly Dr. Ground Cover area: 4,605 square feet Hardscape area: 3,394 square feet EN-39 The south side of Banyan St from Golden Lock PI to Raindrop PI. Ground Cover area 6,024 square feet Hardscape area: 330 square feet EN-40 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Colonbero Rd to Breeders Cup Dr. The east side of Wardman Bullock Rd from Colonbero Rd to 385 feet south of Colonbero Rd. Ground Cover area: 28,527 square feet Hardscape area: 21,723 square feet EN-41 The north side of Colonbero Rd from Wardman Bullock Rd to Ambleside PI. The south side of Colonbero Rd from 150 feet east of Wardman Bullock Rd to Ambleside PI. The east side of Ambleside PI from Colonbero Rd to 700 feet north of Colonbero Rd. Ground Cover area: 17,065 square feet Hardscape area: 12,990 square feet EN-42 The west side of Wardman Bullock Rd from 778 feet north of Coral Sky Dr to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Wardman Bullock Rd to 218 feet west of Compass PI. The east and west sides of Compass PI. from Wilson Ave to the entrance monuments. Ground Cover area: 31,809 square feet Hardscape area: 34,321 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 362 Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintenance under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 363 TI r �• v D � City of Rancho Cucamonga v-0 Landscape Maintenance district No. 7 O RANCHO N CUCA,ONCA Irrigation Sites CD . ' �r4+wr�� r�+�f�fr�as.�.�.�.�.srr+� LL EM17i N "ENAd,,, 7 n EN16 (D � EN35 EN18 M. _-.., EN,ii EH7 i f EN.1 EN10 EN14j Z EN12 E4 11 ; O � -4 �` EN23 ENS j �/Wo EN2 EN28 0 EN21� f EN6 �' ��— I�SrI IdIV EN3EN5 `G EN20 —ENT9-- ——EN1P O N• EN38 �. EN33 i II EN37 ENEN34 n Y EN3fl 1 O G} EN25 EN15 C ; 1M — EN31 iw��i��i _-- EN26— EN2T Banyan St EN29 EN39 • 8,1� /1W 3 E N32 EN2d ,v EN22 Legend —� EN4 �—— - --- ---- - - - -�' '---- - -- — • Water Meters ■ Irrigation Pumps v Irrigation Lines sr n W J4E) 7 City Limits wa�.a wren cr�.w..r..r,.e a s...:a e.+•nerr.�. � (pmmae.n,.�rdaaua.mw �r (wZ Miles 0.5 .dp Ik a►rein e O �aY e�ate«•+...��a.ua.....,.r�e..�.... Lam' -4 N ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 136,830 Part-time Salaries 23,670 Fringe Benefits 74,580 Subtotal - Personnel 235,080 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 38,130 O & M/Facilities 5,000 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 9,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 52,330 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 454,520 Contract Services/Facilities 2,750 Tree Maintenance 25,090 Subtotal - Contract Services 482,360 Utilities: Water Utilities 343,150 Electric Utilities 16,170 Subtotal - Utilities 359,320 Assessment Administration 16,130 Admin./General Overhead 104,930 Other Expenses 680 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,015,750 Capital Expenditures: Capital Outlay- Equipment 3,350 Capital Outlay- Improvement Other Than Building 100,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 103,350 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,354,180 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 365 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 939,910 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 11,540 Subtotal - Taxes 951,450 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 14,600 Other Rental/Lease Income 42,860 Park Maintenance Fees 1,250 Sports Lighting Fees 3,180 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 61,890 Total Revenues Budget 1,013,340 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (340,840) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 949,398.60 Total District EBU Count 3,092.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 307.05 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 307.05 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 1,217,449 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (340,840) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 876,609 Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 366 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 367 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 368 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 369 share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIID and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIID and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since 1996/97 Fiscal Year. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1 1.00 1 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#07 Page 370 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $307.05 $307.05 3,092.00 3,092.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 371 -n r �• v D 0 �' S City of Rancho Cucamonga C c Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 O RANCHO — € _ (North Etiwanda) N Cl1CAMONCA -1- O N i 1 U = Q S = N) ; ■ul-I-1-1-I-1-1-1-w u1-1 I-I-u l-1■TIMIM,MIMI- !PNEIMIMIMIMIMI IMIM101MIN—IM61—0,4 1 N) � ■Y e6 N O ■ ■ ■ Hillside Rd ! ' ' ■ m i +; "' !Wilson Av 0 Banyan St ! ■ i Z a O � v + I 19th St A o Base Line Rd All iiii Base Line Rd D 4i n =r iiii O ■ Foothill Bl Foothill BI v oArrow Rt Arrow Rt � 1 v 8th St ,} ' i } ♦} 1-I-Ir > m6th Sk } 0 11 C9 7} w Legend 4th St j_l.l..1 �j 4th St ■:: i 7 7 7 } y } -1� CityLimits s�ef a.nea nervy r�prrranaprr.imeeeJ W.'e4Mreti. C M C C L lO LMa 1 rn.�eraarere neaeeq�r.Yu�wnanr�rO rWs rlW�w (Q� er earrq a+aW+rt�b rl n u..i�d+rc Ldrn�n lt} � iFi � � Q] � y"•-•r,a,lrrs ttr r r..x roe�#wa v.sx.rnrk,�ra..r E O 7 Y ' C Cl)m re Ldm.,e.,.,.b..,+M re W wa.um.a•o.�io.a�. _ M = IO ttr m s wea een..4r w rrn..w.m e4ar...n ran L _ 03 vZ �w.rm-Ya one...rm neon e. inr.a n er.�c+.e.rerun m = L Miles H/w.ewmeer Yd Err At a pmalr wOda�.dtr tl Nvu y� = L {V ..ex ew..o-r o-n.erau n.e•rrareo-n aa.r.a..�.no.n.«.n u O N 4 O ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $307.05 3,092.00 3,092.00 $949,398.60 Totals 3,092.001 3,092.001 $949,398.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0225-122-84 06/04/20 DRC2018-00974 1.00 1.00 SFD 0226-102-30 08/06/20 SUBTT19917 10.00 10.00 SFD Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #07 Page 373 Preliminary Annual Engineering Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Page 374 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.774.2700 Fax: 909.774.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 375 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 General Benefit 11 Special Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 12 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 376 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 5,460 Operations and Maintenance 36,770 Total Expenditures Budget 42,230 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 33,920 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 370 Subtotal - Taxes 34,290 Other Revenues 810 Total Revenues Budget 35,100 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (7,130) Total District EBU Count 226.22 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 151.45 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 377 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 378 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 379 conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as South Etiwanda, which is south of the I-210 Freeway along Fisher Dr, east of East Ave, including the south side of Highstone Manor Ct, the south side of Smokestone St, and to the San Bernardino County Flood Control drainage basin on east side. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have been developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 380 and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Site # Descriptive Location SE-1 The east side of East Ave from 480 feet south of Catalpa St to 182 feet north of Catalpa St. The north and south side of Catalpa St from East Ave to Brownstone PI. The west side of Brownstone PI from Catalpa St to 150 feet south of Catalpa St. Not including the frontage parkway at 6649 East Ave. Ground Cover area: 10,355 square feet Turf area: 6,258 square feet Hardscape area: 4,050 square feet SE-2 The south side of Fisher Dr from 361 feet east of East Ave to 210 feet east of Starstone PI. Ground Cover area: 9,366 square feet Hardscape area: 4,074 square feet SE-3 The south side of Fisher Dr from 860 feet west of Mulberry St to Mulberry St. Ground Cover area: 3,676 square feet Hardscape area: 6,910 square feet SE-4 The east of side of East Ave from 700 feet south of Fisher Dr to Fisher Dr. The south side of Fisher Dr from East Ave to 358 feet east of East Ave. Ground Cover area: 5,174 square feet Hardscape area: 10,694 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. With a Majority Protest for the Proposition 218 Ballot Initiative in September 2010, the City stopped maintaining the north side of Fisher Dr and reduced the service level to a B. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 381 -n r Q City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. S (D CD i v CIDRANCHO Irrigation Sites PO o � N) CD N =3 1 } N ♦ .l 0 .5E2 - - - *` I (D M. i Z o r' 00 5E1 L 'f o N D n S o / r v f 3 o r� ui (Q r Legend �f ,�l + Water Meter D L ' Irrigation Lines n r•+ LMD 8 _ The �. ^^k p—wd:�,��, d �a^° � City Limits me Oty d fmisM�mwrp aIe pnexnml as a a—naounx d rFasd quara rn. CCi ■1�1� m nr rxT of aar�r Irmn�Duke Izr Nrvl 1 rn wanme r Al r &eon or Z em `- (Q z as m>re a»�>�Q,aos:a<x a:��aeg«ua,dme�me arq fr�r.mrba (D Z Qoyu�m you :d L Trr u.s do na re+p upon u afamm�:,F.,any are a e.elm m edepemenw raTv arty ne 1 mrc.,nenm ur-prod Irani j W The Ger d hwchD OrarmrF mokw am wm.rn l ne dwa s wW and ad �• 00* a a1—nh� �mry.bd 11,M d m,dr ism mmm Np d me dmraboty"f ps I«a partlmlar Dome.The 4ty m1 fend.Cumna>rap 00 Oy) ana� ro �.c a y INdllx rryard�d ur mumm br f9 • Miles cools,or�c«humr�m am mfmrann prondm argrQ p9 aq anon« I iredlan®.rty d�m yap pa:ora idmnrr upm>re fnf—m —11a a padre �f� -'+ -o� -� ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 3,640 Fringe Benefits 1,820 Subtotal - Personnel 5,460 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 1,500 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 10,620 Tree Maintenance 3,720 Subtotal - Contract Services 14,340 Utilities: Water Utilities 9,950 Electric Utilities 610 Subtotal - Utilities 10,560 Assessment Administration 1,060 Admin./General Overhead 9,310 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 36,770 Total Expenditures Budget $ 42,230 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 383 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 33,920 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 370 Subtotal - Taxes 34,290 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 810 Total Revenues Budget 35,100 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (7,130) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 34,261.02 Total District EBU Count 226.22 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 151.45 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 151.45 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved when the District was formed, and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 52,162 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (7,130) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 45,032 Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 384 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 385 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if"by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 386 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next"separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred,"and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 387 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 388 The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $151.45 $151.45 199.00 199.00 Non-Residential 151.45 151.45 13.61 27.22 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 389 -n r (n n < City of Rancho Cucamonga v _ f 0 Landscape Maintenance District No. S CD m �` RANCHO � � - (South Etiwanda) ry x a x x ON �_ �ua.uuu..f af�f.u�ruf uu� .r.�r.r.��rrrr.^tF �r.r.r�i.i.71. 1=JW.r..r.IMI=irf.f.,* N (D + j m 1 N 7 j > 1 Hillside Rd ! p i Wilson Av CD Fn' Im.4 0 i M. Banyan St 0 4 Z j O � 00 19th 5t} � I 7Rd oBase Line Rd *kx Base D #I r n O Foothill BI Foothill BI n v oArrow Rt Arrow Rt v � 8th St > a �6th S� Legend D 4th St' 4th St ■ C� i City Limits = The nqe, ffi,a d�aphk rro n s w f 7 fv a�'y..s�E ny a w e.ayn 7 3 7 7 6.61 r d�n<�hmmnr�a,e�.�as a pau.�.�a r�erd.rar�m- � d Q Q < �v¢ � The Ory d P.—�mnor ,b.—. P..P..m ros,wsµ ^ ,.mmee W M as m de�> ,—x t��«a fines d arry � � a 'a Lh1 D S p.n,d, m Teu f—, n� d not oeh'upon—Crum,for w,v ra.mn CAD z .d d m m ary a r d i Edon,uQ urs �n r. E Tr C4 d hit f.C—arw aOkm am nW Immrwn diwam wry and ai L W reprae�and wmmr&= ir�rq,dd=.maed m.do impm wacomes ql _ C.O* of rnerdumboty and ME, fm a paN ar P.rp®e_TI. On'd fat,da Cum q` pCD doi m&e at»mr asune any rbIux,nWrd�of u aa-ra—far(q am � x fl W 1 0.5 O 00 error;c z v it._V In aM infta a prwWW wart fi0 arry soon ar D1 neanrr—"ma:m airy p—iees,x up-me hdcmuacn auaIbal nerd, ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $151.45 199.00 199.00 $30,138.55 Non-Residential 151.451 13.61 27.221 4,122.47 Totals 1 212.61 226.22 $34,261.02 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#08 Page 391 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) Page 392 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 9 (LOWER ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 393 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget 9 Definitions of Budget Items 11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Overview 12 General Benefit 13 Special Benefit 13 Method of Assessment Spread 14 Cost of Living Inflator 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18 Assessment Roll 18 Annexations 18 Page 394 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021 the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 (Lower Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 344,520 Operations and Maintenance 299,030 Capital Expenditures 460 Total Expenditures Budget 644,010 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 671,200 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,380 Subtotal - Taxes 672,580 Other Revenues 19,120 Total Revenues Budget 691,700 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 47,690 Total District EBU Count 2,173.56 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 311.92 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 644.67 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 395 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 396 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 397 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Lower Etiwanda, which is south of Victoria St, north of Foothill Blvd, generally east of Etiwanda Ave and the 1-15 Freeway and west of East Ave. Typically, parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 398 repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Garcia Park (formerly known as South Etiwanda Park). Site # Descriptive Location 9-1 The west side of East Ave from 380 feet north of Chateau Dr to 290 feet south of Chateau Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,244 square feet Hardscape area: 7,525 square feet 9-2 The west side of East Ave from 339 feet north of Brookfield Dr to 157 north of Brookfield Dr. Brookfield Dr from East Ave to Oakcrest Ct. The east side of Oakcrest Ct to 137 feet north of Brookfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 2,390 square feet Hardscape area: 6,874 square feet 9-3 The west side of East Ave from 790 feet north of Highfield Dr to 256 feet south of Highfield Dr. Ground Cover area: 8,769 square feet Hardscape area: 10,669 square feet 9-4 The west side of East Ave from 295 feet north of Via Veneto Dr To Via Veneto Dr. The north side of Via Veneto Dr From East Ave to Dolcetto Pl. The east side of Dolcetto PI from Via Veneto Dr to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from 372 feet west of Dolcetto PI to 240 feet east of Dolcetto PI. The west side of Dolcetto PI from Miller Ave to Garcia Dr. The north side of Garcia Dr from Dolcetto PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 48,612 square feet Hardscape area: 28,746 square feet 9-5 The north side of Miller Ave from 429 feet west of Dolcetto PI to 1029 feet west of Dolcetto PI. Ground Cover area: 6,519 square feet Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 399 9-6 The north side of Miller Ave from 254 feet east of Dolcetto PI to 167 feet west of Dolcetto PI. Ground Cover area: 4,089 square feet Hardscape area: 2,854 square feet 9-8 The south side of Base Line Rd from Etiwanda Ave to Shelby PI. The Base Line Rd median from Etiwanda Ave to 473 feet east of Shelby PI. Ground Cover area: 16,395 square feet Hardscape area: 14,558 square feet 9-9 The north side of Candlewood St from Exbury PI to Etiwanda Ave. Ground Cover area: 3,362 square feet Hardscape area: 786 square feet 9-10 The north side of Base Line Rd from 522 feet east of Forester PI to 180 feet west of Forester Pl. The Base Line Rd median from 503 feet east of Forester PI to 200 feet west of Forester PI. Ground Cover area: 16,930 square feet Hardscape area: 13,600 square feet 9-11 The north side of Mueller Ct from 40 feet past the east end of Mueller Ct to 20 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 9,420 square feet Hardscape area: 742 square feet 9-12 The north and south sides of Highland Ave from 217 feet west of Norcia Dr to 210 feet east of Dicarlo PI. Ground Cover area: 12,471 square feet Hardscape area: 14,445 square feet 9-13 The south side of Carnesi Dr from Etiwanda Ave to 395 feet east of Murietta Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,919 square feet Hardscape area: 6,203 square feet 9-14 The west side of East Ave from 665 feet north of Miller Ave to Miller Ave. The north side of Miller Ave from East Ave to 667 feet west of East Ave. Ground Cover area: 9,150 square feet Hardscape area: 16,226 square feet 9-15 The north side of Base Line Rd from Shelby PI to 343 feet east of Shelby PI. Ground Cover area: 3,480 square feet Hardscape area: 4,638 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 400 9-16 The east side of Dolcetto PI from Garcia Dr to Via Veneto Dr. The south side of Via Veneto Dr from Dolcetto PI to East Ave. The west side of East Ave from Via Veneto Dr to 276 feet south of Via Veneto Dr. Ground Cover area: 16,310 square feet Hardscape area: 13,411 square feet 9-17 The east side of Etiwanda Ave from 145 feet south of Miller Ave to Miller Ave. The south side of Miller Ave from Etiwanda Ave to Three Vines Pl. Ground Cover area: 7,535 square feet Hardscape area: 6,130 square feet FH-17 The Foothill Blvd median from Etiwanda Ave to Cornwell Ct. Ground Cover area: 8,275 square feet Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 401 TI r �• v v City of Rancho Cucamonga r Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 ; NCID RANC CUCAACHo _ 911 Irrigation Sites CD N CD d m I N i O 9-13 ti (OD CP w C 0M. N G W, ro I W O 0 Victoria Park r-113 *► CO 9-2 I C7 L O +PE16 ;U I' F5 N Base Lille AY n 111 9=sue 7p =r , O 0 v 9-3 O0 9� � I v church St 9.5 9-6 Legend 9-14 .-4 �� • Water Meters D ■ Irrigation Pumps n — irrigation Lines �= 1n —Fs,d=.and W q.phk r[O�(Jrica -)"Wbk!by am dw—gh v ��<ha� ,�pm� apuat �aFfiaadm. ! -� LIVID 9 �� rh<oq a r�arvn Q,maorA.awry�,urpuc rn n.narey�r' �q,ararr� CD m a:m,r,< oar a nndineac d anF L.b .aim prwtl¢1 m ,r< � mry�p,� ,hx an.�� y �Z ad a m ra.rd-dy—fv 1 Jd—b— �� n�� FH17 City LII7Ylt5 CD m Cry P dro C---W�+wnr a a �lrn .d� any am ad — ------- * — � ir�r� N mpioeaerna and m maw l� rg,ht�nma m•u WpIM--r d rnnc M"q and � rofa m aism�foL aia p ¢ r P ttn r4tromf farrd C—r g«a O AY MblltK rqprdk—a � a hr fq m � . Miles san inte= pwdm wdw GQ"sdcnCO 00 mn Na;m rry �� p— o-* a a1 . 0.35 4.175 4 435 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budqet Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 214,050 Part-time Salaries 18,670 Fringe Benefits 111,800 Subtotal - Personnel 344,520 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 17,800 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 1,200 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 19,000 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 107,440 Tree Maintenance 33,930 Subtotal - Contract Services 141,370 Utilities: Water Utilities 67,090 Electric Utilities 4,240 Subtotal - Utilities 71,330 Assessment Administration 7,700 Admin./General Overhead 59,630 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 299,030 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Equipment 460 Total Expenditures Budget $ 644,010 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 403 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 671,200 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,380 Subtotal - Taxes 672,580 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 16,060 Park Maintenance Fees 2,950 Sports Field User Group Rentals 110 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 19,120 Total Revenues Budget 691,700 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 47,690 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 677,976.84 Total District EBU Count 2,173.56 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 311.92 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 644.67 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 1,651,213 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 47,690 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 1,698,903 Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 404 The City has reserve funds that are more than sufficient to cover an estimated six months' worth of maintenance and servicing costs for the District. When there are excess funds in the District's reserve account, the excess can be used to lower the annual levy to property owners within the District. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 405 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 406 The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the Assessment District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 407 • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 408 The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $644.67 $311.92 1,080.00 1,080.00 Multi-Family Residential 644.67 311.92 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non-Residential 644.67 311.92 18.28 36.56 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2001/02, the maximum allowable assessment may be increased each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside — San Bernardino — Ontario Consumer Price Index area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. For Fiscal Year 2021/22, the actual assessment rate will decrease from $436.69 to $311.92 per single-family residence. It has been determined that there are sufficient revenues available in the District to meet all financial obligations without an increase to the District for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Hence, a 40% reduction was implemented for FY 2021/22 sufficient funds to sustain the District expenditures. The goal of the City is to ensure that the district has a reserve fund balance equal to one year's district expenditures. The City will continue to annually review the estimated costs and expenses for the District as well as reserve fund levels, in order to determine if future levies can be reduced as well. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#09 Page 409 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 410 Tr r City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 CD -0 p�ti q3 � � W Y NCD RANCHO MIA � � _ � _ _ � Lower Etiwanda) CD MIMI=11INIMI-0: 7 j in N =3 Hillside Rd ! ; i u n w j 3 i Wilson Av m % w w z n Bdliyan Sts! Z o ! CD .�. I 19th St 10 ~a Base Line Rd x r Line Rd 0) +•4Ir0o Foothill BIll BI 3 Arrow Rt Rt v i 8th St j J 1 MIM1: > r m th S� Legend u D > 4th St 14th St ri City Limits (7 Me n�,dam,.d 7.yraphk I&rraalon(71nb�')a L�� Mane er.—yn y y 7 > L...... rha Ory d Parchp�morpp are pn as a pualt n�punx d rpaal rfarnuam. "_v fo F LMD 9 CDf�f�f prwpel m Tvu Men Tfx uaQ dart n.x rely up-rce lrimrmn for any rm>xn fp 41 0.7 N 1 r 1 aN a Goe:l�m F[1�adently yal�•ary antl of ]idmrIDom presrmd I�eren C Y �Z T1re cq d Bardio Ormvr p o0ltlw am,Mloue lFnratlor.ae�Fns any and NI C E 03 mp nxnmtt¢u and—PU= In ry,bd n 11 t U ma irrow 1� d r M tdq and face fa,a pm r pu.�a.m aqr cf P—d.epmn> :`'vl e a slid neHrc a prade ror alma-anY ,4-SII}MbIIbw mprdk—of tt mush—for(0 am � � W 1 0_5 n O ` cm pravlQa a Inamra�In anf In fvnaH- a "—a Co -r :ee on my rq pu m any p—rt upon, tr f—m —Im.fx , ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $311.92 1,080.00 1,080.00 $336,873.60 Multi-Family Residential 311.92 1,057.00 1,057.00 329,699.44 Non-Residential 311.92 18.281 36.561 11,4013.80 Totals 2,155.281 2,173.561 $677,976.84 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #09 Page 412 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) Page 413 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 10 (RANCHO ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 414 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 7 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 9 District Budget 9 Definitions of Budget Items 11 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 12 Overview 12 General Benefit 13 Special Benefit 13 Method of Assessment Spread 14 Cost of Living Inflator 15 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 15 ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS 17 Assessment Roll 17 Annexations 17 Page 415 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 (Rancho Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 271,690 Operations and Maintenance 418,960 Capital Expenditures 151,790 Total Expenditures Budget 842,440 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 608,110 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 5,550 Subtotal - Taxes 613,660 Other Revenues 46,790 Total Revenues Budget 660,450 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (181,990) Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 781.48 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 992.03 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 416 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 417 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 418 hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area known as Rancho Etiwanda, which lies north of the 210 Freeway, east of Day Creek Channel, and west of Bluegrass Ave. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 419 repair and replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows: Parks: Day Creek Park. Site # Descriptive Location 10-1 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 790 feet north of Richfield Dr to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 227 feet west of Day Creek Blvd. This site overlaps 10-2. Ground Cover area: 16,941 square feet Hardscape area: 3,589 square feet 10-2 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from 497 feet west of Alvarado PI to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Wilson Ave from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. The Wilson Ave median from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. Ground Cover area: 47,275 square feet Hardscape area: 6,444 square feet 10-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Wilson Ave to 144 feet south of Clydesdale Dr. The Day Creek Blvd median from Wilson Ave to Banyan St. Ground Cover area: 32,619 square feet Hardscape area: 10,983 square feet 10-4 The east side of Day Creek Blvd from 648 feet south of Keenland Dr to Wilson Ave. Ground Cover area: 15,952 square feet Hardscape area: 4,365 square feet 10-5 The west side of Bluegrass Ave from Wilson Ave to 705 feet south of Challendon Dr. Ground Cover area: 26,882 square feet Hardscape area: 12,220 square feet 10-6 The south side of Banyan St from Rochester Ave to Day Creek Blvd. The north side of Banyan St from 427 feet west of Rocking Horse PI to Rocking Horse Pl. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Banyan St to Vintage Dr. The north side of Vintage Dr from Day Creek Blvd to the paseo ending 153 feet west of Sandhill PI. Ground Cover area: 44,000 square feet Hardscape area: 16,197 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 420 10-7 The north side of Vintage Dr from 180 feet east of Taylor Canon PI to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Vintage Dr to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Day Creek Blvd to Bluegrass Ave. Ground Cover area: 22,164 square feet Hardscape area: 11,724 square feet 10-8 The landscape against the south side facing wall north of the 210 freeway from the top of the slope on the east side of Day Creek Blvd to 300 feet eastward. The Day Creek Blvd median from the 210 freeway to Vintage Dr. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Caltrans ROW to Vintage Dr. The south side of Vintage Dr from Day Creek Blvd to 180 feet east of Taylor Canyon PI. Ground Cover area: 16,841 square feet Hardscape area: 7,025 square feet 10-9 The north side of Coyote Dr from Brookstone PI to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Coyote Dr to 358 feet north of Coyote Dr. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 118 feet north of Coyote Dr to 380 feet north of Coyote Dr. Ground Cover area: 9,403 square feet Hardscape area: 6,052 square feet 10-10 The north side of Wilson Ave from 395 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Wilson Ave to Blackstone Dr. The south side of Blackstone Dr from Day Creek Blvd to Stoneview Rd. The north side of Blackstone Dr from Day Creek Blvd to 165 feet west of Stoneview Rd. Ground Cover area: 26,304 square feet Hardscape area: 19,117 square feet 10-11 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 340 feet north of Banyan St to Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Day Creek Blvd to Rocking Horse Pl. Ground Cover area: 20,378 square feet Hardscape area: 11,212 square feet 10-12 The paseo on the east side of Stoneview Rd across from Duncaster PI. Ground Cover area: 3,326 square feet Hardscape area: 2,374 square feet 10-13 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 340 feet south of Vintage Dr to 915 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 27,416 square feet Hardscape area: 16,167 square feet Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 421 10-14 The south side of Vintage Dr from Saddle Tree PI to Day Creek Blvd. The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Vintage Dr to 325 feet south of Vintage Dr. Ground Cover area: 7,777 square feet Hardscape area: 8,101 square feet *This sites irrigation pump and valves are powered from site 10-13 Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews. Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 422 -n r City of Rancho Cucamonga m Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 RANCHO Irrigation Sites CUCAMCNGA —7 CD �p� N � j 0 + 70 9 �f 10-12 F � = I r 10-1 i' Z 1010 102 I N-- O 10-3-104 Wilson AV ' * 10-5 I O� Q I } I � v ti I I 0 o C7 I m W W n 0) ! 3 10-11 O 0 --� Banyan St v � Legend I • Water Meters s ■ Irrigation Pumps � ��I 0-13 n r a p.dam,and V—o pht riomwan(q�•)"Ll !w fha I I Irrigation Lines _ C4 of�Rro z� mas a�as�publk--a gym. ---- - - LIVID 1 (Q� in�orydican�n,mawo�rar.�pn�: .,arrmv.r -�r�na� wa.arr� ---i as gym,amsar-�s+Vk4��«u�rdlnes d �1-� lD rn m you rev T!z na apm ,ran m F any F.any m� r and c daeed m nary "Y am ai ]n'.r � horyn s i Y Limits Z The Cq d ka 4ra-w-ow"am-&tl lanes dCr>m arty ad all � �f�f CN�J -preaaHa ,are.aaaab>� laaialry.kb rd.Ilmrocf t.tle"Ok!d—imp - of me=a"blgr am fares for a parcntar Rarpae.The Oly of fwWc Curan rip *k .1of a!V——p as say haWkty,r.am�d .-- for f9 amMiles ama onaaams or inaoyrara m am mfmrsum arodrn arNo<¢I}any mon« -- O oo *w d— say paracra b,aao-apm rz r k aauoo aoi�e r 1E- 0.'125 0 0.25 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 156,650 Overtime Salaries 1,050 Part-time Salaries 28,280 Fringe Benefits 85,710 Subtotal - Personnel 271,690 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 16,270 O & M/Facilities 1,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 3,300 Equip Operations & Maint 500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 21,570 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 151,320 Contract Serv/Facilities 3,770 Tree Maintenance 11,800 Subtotal - Contract Services 166,890 Utilities: Water Utilities 131,150 Electric Utilities 12,470 Subtotal - Utilities 143,620 Assessment Administration 4,120 Admin./General Overhead 82,110 Misc Contributions to City 650 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 418,960 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Equipment 1,790 Captial Project 150,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 151,790 Total Expenditures Budget $ 842,440 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 424 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 608,110 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 5,550 Subtotal - Taxes 613,660 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 15,280 Other Rental/Lease Income 27,220 Park Maintenance Fees 180 Sports Field User Group Rentals 40 Sports Lighting Fees 3,970 Other Revenue 100 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 46,790 Total Revenues Budget 660,450 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (181,990) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 614,243.28 Total District EBU Count 786.00 Actual Assessment per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 781.48 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 992.03 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 1,404,480 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (181,990) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 1,222,490 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 425 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 426 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D. all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 427 General Benefit Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed. In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the District and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the District which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City's system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#10 Page 428 The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $992.03 $781.48 786.00 786.00 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 429 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Cost of Living Inflator Each fiscal year beginning with Fiscal Year 2002/03, the maximum allowable assessment may increase each year, based upon the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"), All Urban Consumers (CPI- U), for the Riverside — San Bernardino — Ontario Consumer Price Index area, as determined by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, or its successor. The Engineer shall compute the percentage difference between the CPI for March of each year and the CPI for the previous March, and shall then adjust the existing assessment by an amount not to exceed such percentage for the following fiscal year. Should the Bureau of Labor Statistics revise such index or discontinue the preparation of such index, the Engineer shall use the revised index or a comparable system as approved by the City Council for determining fluctuations in the cost of living. If for any reason the percentage change is negative the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI adjustment. The annual assessment cannot exceed the actual costs to operate the District in any given year. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that year. The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2021/22 will increase from $758.72 to $781.48 per single-family residence, a CPI increase of 3.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2020/21. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 430 -n r Q a , City of Rancho Cucamonga v M -2 Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 ,. v m R �H° ., : E --�� w " (Rancho Etiwanda) I.uIMr.1.1.uuu,.I.� ,r 1 N D D Hillside Rd ! a 3 i Wilson Av m ! w v p � � .r4 0 Banyan St+' Z i 0 19th St o Base Line Rd +! Base Line Rd D >c 0 Foothill BI o Foothill BI n c 0 a)3 Arrow Rt Arrow Rt 0 cn i v 8th St q1 �_ � d Q nth S Legend 5 4th St' -IAIMIMj4th St ■ i City Limits D 6-0 } } } } t -------- Li.i.ii �= rnardRa io�acrr�aaa cm.per nr..� ma�I,.a+� c LMI7 1a � .m a�a.�ae,waa.amr«-c�,oldeses«na,dmrss d ar,r ut„ren�a � N C � L [C7 m,rz—&d m rW h� �M as�r.7�ter., oar— M 6 y G1 47 43 'CS � erc�m nfinerclmnr rarrr a*i a.ei Lrcnrrasa,urar+mi Helen g � CD m rn cry d an itnrnn� air a�am di E [n ara r= lw rq,bd r>*na,�f m,8,r lmod amrta QJ i = �Z U d madertNq arti lE�ev f«a pm[xrer purrs. ory ar fmndn eama,�a = G7 U M I W� del adha ems ro.ae3n,z oar ue r . K,J a me r s 01 m inbeqnm for(q ary �` 2 ❑ W 1 a.�a �� mamma m a m e m xQ oq .eeba�r.tq a.�m oar P—�.P— �tr,kr„an«�eraimn��n Q ASSESSMENT ROLL and ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following tables summarize the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $781.48 786.00 786.00 $614,243.28 Totals 786.001 786.001 $614,243.28 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #10 Page 432 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterials) Page 433 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (ARTERIALS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 434 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 435 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 (Arterial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 23,040 Operations and Maintenance 677,900 Transfer Out 113,200 Total Expenditures Budget 814,140 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 822,180 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,890 Subtotal - Taxes 829,070 Other Revenues 7,200 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 7,940 Total Revenues Budget 844,210 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 30,070 Total District EBU Count 46,736.66 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 17.77 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 436 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 437 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 438 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City of Rancho Cucamonga. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 439 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #11 Page 440 mc/) (D City of Rancho Cucamonga W CD_ CD a Q Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 RANCHU —� L E L E " (Arterials) CD cQ «,�,,, . F- I r ¢ L---------�-- ----------- -� NCD I • • v Hillside Rd , y Wilson Av 0 Q I Banyan 5t « . • • # * —~I 0 14: o ` 19th St • `< Base Line Rd4 • o rl t Base Line Rd D i � I n � 11 �°� Foothill BI Fill m# qD Foothill BI c oArro�v� Rt , * ��� Arrow Rt 8th 5t.T 1 r y' ¢' 6=0 D Q6th s , r Legend ■ Ln ti w + Street Lights n � 4th SO 4th St r SLID = Te rtq �.ad gmpmpAk rlan rw C1Am tea').�mk ny ann }veuph L_ mar rn�Rn.nm � ��a�uc �a�.r��um_ Q 4 Q Q > ��y (Q ,ne Ory d Rarer b�.nnp nvdoe rc..rpAc ru remcv,ny.�uon v q,.nmee < c m T!�mtrnt rmca,anrarF.—1,1—«t dl—d arry Lfmra[bn r ,� City Limits CD m swum m emu haen. rre d�n,x�r upm vx Livn�!my rmcn Q} q} N .� ��••� �Z nd a d m r.,mru kwly str a.a ai Ldanaum p—ad n<tp a m db a ��a.v bn iM de���r.ni ad E i� ioicse�ums.,n--M� o,a,ary, rv.HW�d m,tk impel�imime qa i = L .tee me.q ab re w a pa�a amp.The oq d rand.c-- 41 ..l. any veal nq.bea d me mumum m,pr.m = 4 = o w Miles 1.am mramano,�m:Wa Vi) « CF) .vmon ommq eue m any p—i =upon me rnkn,uecn e,oiheie r,aen � , -' ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 15,360 Fringe Benefits 7,680 Subtotal - Personnel 23,040 Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 7,990 Cellular Technology 2,000 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 500 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,720 Contract Services 47,750 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 1,500 Electric Utilities 406,000 Subtotal - Utilities 407,500 Assessment Administration 152,990 Admin./General Overhead 58,940 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 677,900 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 113,200 Total Expenditures Budget $ 814,140 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #11 Page 442 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 822,180 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 6,890 Subtotal - Taxes 829,070 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 7,200 Transfer In Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 7,940 Total Revenues Budget 844,210 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 30,070 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 830,510.45 Total District EBU Count 46,736.66 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 17.77 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 17.77 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 497,911 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 30,070 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 527,981 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 443 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the debt service has been suspended due to the structural operating deficit and will be routinely monitored. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 444 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 445 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 446 When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Benefit Unit ("EBU") method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Benefit Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 447 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Rate Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Sin le Family Residential $17.77 $17.77 28,355.00 28,355.00 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 17.77 11,957.00 11,957.00 Non-Residential 17.77 17.771 3,212.331 6,424.66 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 448 -nc/) w CD n a a City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 CD RANCHO E Y (Arterials) N cucAMoac+ .�: ; U 2 < 2 = O( ; FIr_i_r_I_r_r_r!r_1_rr lal■1 WINWIM17miml.rMr#r. Ir_r_r.1_I_r_r.rmI_rmr_r_r_I F61_I1.50: �N � * �Y ]ry ■ N (D Hillside Rd D I Wil,,an Av ■ y w COD ■ s _t4 0 F Banyan St + 0 ! Z 19th St qr 7�� Base Line Rd ! u o Base Line Rd v D 0 �°� Foothill BI Foothill BI c w Arrow Rt Arrow Rt o 8th St ; D o m6th S v Legend y L U LD D 4th St I L14th St ■ ri City Limits n W�.d=,sn p-!�.phK rt�C;rf�•)"mk!by aye&,-o d�my a P..h.nm...—pr—t�d .Pude--d ior Wad r .. Q } Q - rn.�rq— m C I 1 m m uvaye,.emaQ,am,a-% kmn—«nmdl—.f m lrf,—o C Ryy7 C JLD 1 (D m p,vvtl�m�vu Fart Trn u�d��u not-f upon�]riv,r,m,foraj .nV rmmn ad c nre�m rdmodenvy raq x.p am.r Llcmenm pexrmd heron �Z m cq a g o r4p.0".b d o t i�mu« air a y ana.0 — Z y 4�,--j a mimes In ry,bi r xmted m.the imp1w mmn (v in >s Pandm ` M1i25CO f—d. "ry a r ffic..P ra �.Tr. otraaedn U u �k neua�=n.y WWIN rWrd�or iq w ❑ 1 0-5 0 1 -.V-oq CC —ry ne may pm b=.p-v Mf—m maim.rKrer. ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarize the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $17.77 28,355.00 28,355.00 $503,868.35 Multi-Family Residential 17.77 11,957.00 11,957.00 212,475.89 Non-Residential 17.77 3,212.33 6,424.66 114,166.21 Totals 43,524.33 46,736.66 $830,510.45 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1061-261-01 04/16/20 SUBTT20042 26.00 26.00 SFD 0209-251-10 03/05/20 DRC2018-00711 4.60 9.20 MIND 0225-122-84 06/04/20 DRC2018-00974 1.00 1.00 SFD 1076-151-35 07/16/20 PMT2020-01021 1.00 1.00 SFD 0226-102-30 08/06/20 SUBTT19917 10.00 10.00 SFD 0209-013-13& 14 09/16/20 DRC2018-00430 1.56 3.12 MIND 0207-262-28,35, 36,41,42, 45 and 46 11/04/20 DRC2018-00912 11.11 22.22 MIND 0209-211-24 12/02/20 DRC2018-00529 13.45 26.90 MIND 0201-902-16 12/02/20 SUBTPM20098 1.00 1.00 SFD 0208-931-05 12/16/20 PMT2020-01934 1.00 1.00 SFD Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#11 Page 450 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) Page 451 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 2 (LOCAL STREETS) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 452 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 453 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 2 (Local Streets) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance $ 348,940 Transfer Out 110,860 Total Expenditures Budget 459,800 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 373,680 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,000 Subtotal - Taxes 377,680 Transfer In -General Fund 63,610 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 18,510 Total Revenues Budget 459,800 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ - Total District EBU Count 9,443.32 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 39.97 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 454 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirely of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 455 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 456 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the entire City west of Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 457 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 458 -ncn vCID CID City of Rancho Cucamonga CID� Q Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 ;ZA" ° f� :EE y (Local Streets) O(Q .r IN) • I" CID Hillside Rd ; • '� I a I U v` I Wilson Av 0 M CD 1 Banyan St • L f .1 �I .0-� , narra Z 0 19th St • N � Q I � ^ � L Base Line Rd ' L p Base Line Rd n •_ o Foothill BI • Foothill BI n c 0) Arrow Rt Arrow Rt o (Q 8th St = `r v Legend D 16th S [� w Streetlights D 5 4th St _ 4th St 51 D 2 2 r.�a..., ...a...�a. .��a.-.�,..., i (Q� �•�d_....._ .,�„,,,•�,,..e�..,.�.�.�.ao4r.�.. � � c � ry City Limits CID e.o-.+.x wo...+o-..+a��narw.o-uw`ru or r„�.n..e� � 47 q} U] -p �.—•J m m w,rrdn n. �an,r�r wo-.va cro,.o-r, w�+rm E 4 7 Y C h.m.�..�wsr a at r w �w.r•+.a r.... _ tp c�mene'a Yd r-��u.4 wd�4 ort M11nu.tra R.�xp.[wMiu � � L (n J d n.cti uYtr Ye MfI t••pYuaik per•.111r d NYoe _ ` V (0 Miles e 1 0.5 U 1 N CF) ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Operations and Maintenance: Contract Services/General $ 20,940 Utilities: Electric Utilities 288,000 Assessment Administration 38,080 Admin./General Overhead 1,920 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 348,940 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 110,860 Total Expenditures Budget $ 459,800 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 460 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 373,680 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 4,000 Subtotal -Taxes 377,680 Transfer In Transfer In - General Fund 63,610 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 18,510 82,120 Total Revenues Budget 459,800 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ - Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 377,449.49 Total District EBU Count 9,443.32 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 39.97 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 39.97 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City of Rancho Cucamonga to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 1,042,796 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 - Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 1,042,796 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 461 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the debt service has been suspended due to the structural operating deficit and will be routinely monitored. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 462 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 463 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the District that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 464 When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential 1 2.00 1 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 465 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Sin le Family Residential $39.97 $39.97 7,320.00 7,320.00 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 39.97 2,053.00 2,053.00 Non-Residential 39.97 39.97 35.16 70.32 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #12 Page 466 -ncn 0 CD W CD City of Rancho Cucamonga CD� v _ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 c R `�H° r _ E Z Y (Local Streets) o(0 Nam' D Hillside Rd I to m 1 � i I Wilson Aa ti a � Bariyarl St •� .-t n' O ►rtrrr Z 19th St ' � I N � Base Line Rd t U 0 Base Line Rd A.D ` 0 Foothill BI '� Foothill BI n 771 c v Ar i ow Rt Arrow Rt o c� 8th 5t n 'ti a " ¢ ellQ1 r`v 6th 5 � to _ U9 Legend y > 4th S# 4th St SLID 2 City Limits n.�s.erx o.,r.ew�...e.r b..�m�•.eb,a�� �._.J CDm .�� ere.e r.pra.t w�.w rye r.w...a per i.. 4�--Z r. er_.._. ".a.p 4re4•ne.saa -- da..-wr.a yi E Q} (C �,•rw.e ter.. r.a,o,.,.na`__- 01 cl maars4 rs Mr.b.p.it4 pys llt 8n d w.it Guns. Q} < _ W Miles N � ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $39.97 7,320.00 7,320.00 $ 292,580.40 Multi-Family Residential 39.97 2,053.00 2,053.00 $ 82,058.41 Non-Residential 39.97 35.16 70.32 $ 2,810.68 Totals 9,408.16 9,443.32 $ 377,449.49 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 1061-261-01 04/16/20 SUBTT20042 26.00 26.00 SFD 1076-151-35 07/16/20 PMT2020-01021 1.00 1.00 SFD 0201-902-16 1 12/02/20 1 SUBTPM20098 1.00 1 1.00 SFD 0208-931-05 12/16/20 1 PMT2020-01934 1.00 1.00 SFD Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#12 Page 468 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) Page 469 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3 (VICTORIA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 470 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 471 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 3 (Victoria Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 32,360 Operations and Maintenance 171,760 Debt Service 1,308,210 Transfer Out 43,960 Total Expenditures Budget 1,556,290 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 377,600 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 2,730 Subtotal - Taxes 380,330 Other Revenues 18,440 Total Revenues Budget 398,770 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (1,157,520) Total District EBU Count 8,089.24 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 47.15 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 472 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 473 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 474 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the 1-15 Freeway and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Planned Community, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 475 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #13 Page 476 -nc/) CD m City of Rancho Cucamonga E7 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 RANCHO (Victoria Planned Community) PO 7utarnor�w - CD - - --------- --� � I• F ,�I N n CD D { � Of 0 • r CD • •# W Base Line Rd I � I O C � W J � O Foothill BI Legend y Arrow Rt _ w Streetlights C7 m .tea,dam,a.e wank rr aaewa t urm.�a a.r mr aao-ehouph �= eroarp a r�Rroa,ara�aR prmrrd asa wur��a�mum. � Si_D 3 anao�arcuouC . kw� wus�w (Q� m ae�.gym,amra.c�+ok�+�«nmylnes or arr,r Sri e�wn �b,�.lam ,r<—�a t.4.7 U.Limr>a�,for—= City Limits CD Ill m ra —4 ar*r aae ar�,,m uge� %>n The Cq of r.-d.Q.—rap oOwa,am wrd, I dtmrns arty aIw ad .ryr�Yl¢n and--a _ 1n "P•Lei r ad t•.mrmauon tle Implb �rianhe A--, d naedur bd r and R—fora pa—ar piarme.TIC aq at ke ±.tamiraia. slpk m*w amut m :uz a v iwwhrc rr}ard�or ve m=bm for fQ m Miles z« a nam m�m a w mrQ p emp m,�prwd retl a nq am a « a.a=<,a b�a h 0.4 0.2 0 4.4 W CA ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 21,570 Fringe Benefits 10,790 Subtotal - Personnel 32,360 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 9,940 Contract Services 8,050 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 18,220 Utilities: Electric Utilities 112,000 Assessment Administration 34,240 Admin./General Overhead 7,300 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 171,760 Debt Service: Interest Expense 1,110 Principal Repayments 1,307,100 Subtotal - Debt Service 1,308,210 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 43,960 Total Expenditures Budget $ 1,556,290 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #13 Page 478 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 377,600 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 2,730 Subtotal - Taxes 380,330 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 18,440 Total Revenues Budget 398,770 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (1,157,520) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 381,407.67 Total District EBU Count 8,089.24 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 47.15 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 47.15 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 1,669,742 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (1,157,520) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 512,222 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 479 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City General Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the outstanding balance of the interfund loan will be paid off. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 480 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 481 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 482 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $47.15 $47.15 6,843.00 6,843.00 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 47.15 729.00 729.00 Non-Residential 47.15 47.15 258.62 517.24 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#13 Page 483 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #13 Page 484 -ncn v m a } City of Rancho Cucamonga E _ Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 CD `� �t E v " (Victoria Planned Community) RANCHO 2 N � CUCAMONGA ■ [CS = L 4 O(0 N =5 , ■ , L C ' :� CD Hillside Rd ! r v w i Wilson Av M - ■ w CD u Banyan 5t !� i n' i Z I 19th St•, W - ¢ I � - Base Line Rd at!- 0 Base Line Rd �IF v ■ D n Foothill BI Foothill BI n c v Arrow Rt Arrow Rt o v 8th St t��tl, st Legend D > 4th St' 4th 5t ■ City 0 m r.M dam,ad Rppphk rd ewn Clrr� ')MWA!by ana u, gh 7 } } 7 } } } L..... i I Limits �= a,eagr d r�ndnam�.a pn�c a pauc��a rya re«n,auv,_ � � d Q d � cQ E m��..>�._�� ,� n L � SLID 3 troyn�m tw Ir, Tk— 1-0 n e rW upm Ifc lrfmr.b,trx any rmxn 7 Y ' � CD m a d s m rd aerc enux ar r ana ar f eon ana t he�n �Z Tp Cq d P—d.8rmlwga.0" antl.rt Irnraaon dims arty and A — E = a} [� OD mpnoenlYlms"I.w� In rp dY a Nmad m,the ImpIW mmrt a n,e,d ro*dty a d m e>s�a partfolar 4�.Th q o ae Panda Miles 25 —-dtl as nor asc,m any ueaYtx rxgaidls of me mimrw,for(I)arh 2 a w 1 0_5 0 1 it —M� pra.Ylea an;rs(II)ary a'tl[Fl a (L W ^ .malan�m,o tlrr m airy pvzra rduno-upon tl�4,Mrvhcr,a,eltrfe hadn ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $47.15 6,843.00 6,843.00 $322,647.45 Multi-Family Residential 47.15 729.00 729.00 $34,372.35 Non-Residential 47.15 258.62 517.24 $24,387.87 Totals 7,830.62 8,089.241 $381,407.67 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #13 Page 486 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) Page 487 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 4 (TERRA VISTA PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 488 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 489 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 4 (Terra Vista Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 32,360 Operations and Maintenance 88,640 Debt Service 511,990 Transfer Out 20,410 Total Expenditures Budget 653,400 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 164,740 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 730 Subtotal - Taxes 165,470 Other Revenues 6,350 Total Revenues Budget 171,820 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (481,580) Total District EBU Count 5,745.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 28.96 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 490 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. 1, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 491 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 492 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as the Terra Vista Planned Community, which is located north of Foothill Blvd, west of Rochester Ave, east of Haven Ave, south of Base Line Rd and includes the northeast corner of Base Line Rd and Haven Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 493 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 494 -ncn v CD m City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 CD a,ao I •':a0'�* ••'•;'j (Terra Vista Planned Community) N s �: «+• O UD It sa Of m N � • • as N m '•'0 d* Base Line Rd • i « oo 0 0C) _R * ' •i+ " *a a ' 's sCD •% •a s « •,�+•i+i■s '• + i a a■sv'«� s`i+■s's so ,•a •asa•sM,as •sa •s#•i a ss0� ioo .+ « • i r „aS s � ssa « •« • +,«•a•«s ««ass s,••, « as «sa * s,4 s« of s•• s #s«aa«« M. d'.ss• + of ' *is' as « as s •• ■ u • • s a is eZ •s •"� ,ss : a oil Do** ' i +ss + • + «„'' ■ as s •a , a • ' Nis« +« 'ss •+ ' « *i• * s ' �•• iif OP is i • « • • 0 0' s i+' ass i a + ss asi« a a • + ' sss i + sa s dp « ,■• so Do ±«;s • a•••« `< ,■ ; o• o•i�■•is a s•ia« IF+' to ' is s %less p s s afs�s±s ,ssa,s is + *a:s s ■ a % i ' sass« as go@ so j' N•so s w ,a• so +s •a • • ti a I • t , • # a« v ; + ~ *` «& Ghxu�h St Hai � • •• � + •« �! as •« M ~ so M M Foothill BI ^" ~---------------- -- Legend l J IM rgmphk 17ame3an fr]Aart�brr]a 10 by am tlwm;h T= tle�UP—MC prg5aeprca mambIt—ofV-1rfwm m. Streetlights � d Rardv dm makc ra i the (Q m Vae urRnL requefax.amraa��Pl�+hs anlr�Llmr�fon CD wmkkd m„x �mn tm do n�mk ap:n a=hl , fw any [] SLD 4 fll and a noway m rda—d-Ov—Ifv arty aw ]rtcmaaam heron -P�z The Cq d Akio C—rip orpl"arc.ada.o[Imnmon romans—,aid an mproenldlurs ad tiros L In Irq,bd=H,r tp the ImpIW mmn F—d.a blry sad f�—f a parinrziar—mm oq m sad, cmm�� ah.r netlic a�nor aosar>•any IearrX,regardrs of rcre mumoon kr fIS an+ Miles er M in M Inlmrarba proden ara;ra 111)ary acxn« p� proms ,ar ry n-m a 7 p—bvxarr np-are trrronr a Iwl mien 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 21,570 Fringe Benefits 10,790 Subtotal - Personnel 32,360 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 190 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 2,290 Contract Services 3,730 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 11,200 Utilities: Electric Utilities 51,000 Assessment Administration 20,950 Admin./General Overhead 5,490 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 88,640 Debt Service: Interest Expense 1,980 Principal Repayments 510,010 Subtotal - Debt Service 511,990 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 20,410 Total Expenditures Budget $ 653,400 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 496 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 164,740 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 730 Subtotal - Taxes 165,470 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 6,350 Total Revenues Budget 171,820 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (481,580) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 166,397.79 Total District EBU Count 5,745.78 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 28.96 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 28.96 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 566,784 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (481,580) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 85,204 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 497 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the outstanding balance of the interfund loan will be partially paid off. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 498 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 499 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 500 When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EBU). Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 501 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $28.96 $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 28.96 5,250.00 2,625.00 Non-Residential 28.96 28.96 234.39 468.78 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#14 Page 502 -ncn w m a' } City of Rancho Cucamonga m 2 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 v RANCHO !"� ; Y (Terra Vista Planned Community) N CVCAMONGA .1: ; U 2 q 2 2 OCQ iui.uu ul.f.r.f.r rf.llf wIMIM11 NIMIMIN CD Hillside Rd ! ! M � ' i>� 1 Wilson Av D : v ■� w m ` u 0 Banyan St l ' r M 0 i Z 19th St Base Line Rd el! U O �� ZBaLine Rd v � Foothill BI Foothill BI n Y� c w Arrow Rt _ Arrow Rt o � p ■ 1}tl� St la 4i�i 4 ■ 1+ 1 1 • D o m6th S : 1% Legend L dJ St 4th '- D 5 4t17 St' '■ ■ pity Limits (� 11. ,d—,:a 9-9.pht ways 3 7 } �_ �.ara � � ,mo�.mm�a�naen �a�mreon�um. d < d 4�� a m u�mrmnt,x.uia,amrsx m.p�rrs«n.dnKs d x.p;rI n�son C � ru SLID 4 CD rtndd m}w he n. ire u sk"not rek upon M Lftr f«my rmxn (d Cn Q] Q] Q} Ma s m rd=by—ily ny.nn h 1�un,w—rmd n� E o } ' CTI m.c�a rib flra W moor.m,m;mra 1-ca�.nc F.rd ad L _ p n.pio.o .a —ftm mowing,eae r nmHzf t,the imprd ..roc CU C.J--I a r, bdq. rem f«.p.rt r-rk irem m omi.rq a . ❑;yof end- Mr I es wakrx rprd� fm — ' U5=Mn=�r i �in M inf �praMW mzVw Oq ] d—m�nq p—bwsrr up n�trrhrnmtlon m Ib5 [satin ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $28.96 2,652.00 2,652.00 $76,801.92 Multi-Family Residential 28.96 5,250.00 2,625.00 76,020.00 Non-Residential 28.96 234.39 468.78 13,575.87 Totals 8,136.39 5,745.78 $166,397.79 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #14 Page 504 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) Page 505 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 5 (CARYN PLANNED COMMUNITY) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 506 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 507 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 5 (Caryn Planned Community) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 7,260 Operations and Maintenance 43,170 Transfer Out 9,690 Total Expenditures Budget 60,120 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 43,710 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 490 Subtotal -Taxes 44,200 Transfer In - General Fund 28,920 Total Revenues Budget 73,120 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 13,000 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 34.60 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 508 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report, and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 509 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 510 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located north of the 210 Freeway, south of Banyan St, west of Rochester Ave and east of Milliken Ave, also known as the Caryn Planned Community. The boundaries also include Tract No. 13835 east of Rochester Ave and Tracts No. 13748, 13857 and 13858 west of Milliken Ave. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 511 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #15 Page 512 -nc/) m '"•; City of Rancho Cucamonga E Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 CD (0 RA (Caryn Planned Community) CD i o = i i fV =5 M __ _ i Banyan 5t n r • + • • • (D � � * • *r +* ■ * • ■ � a • + ■ • + + � ra ar rararaa ■ • • ** r ■ ; * •••• ■ • * • r + ■ + a • r a r • rr ■ ��• aa Z a * r • r * • * • a a s r r • r a s a + Cn I a i • • • • • + a+ a r • • ■ a + • rr r • • *■ • • r + r + ■ • a C7 � • * • a • • a + + • ■ a • • • v i • • *• a r ■ a r • • ■ ■• • • • + r • r a a • • • • • c�i * • r a • • • • ** a+ + = 1� ■ + r* • ■ * • *• ■• + a * + a ++• + • ■*• * *a •+ +++ ■ • • • i • • • be C7 1 ■ • �• •+ • • • r + r • ■ •• •r a • + • 7 v y Q L. U Legend D U Streetlights C� ,r.�;m,d m.and pxgmphk rfomwu f kabaettW)"vtfl�np am ftwDh ce S LD 5�_ [hc 4yr d ImrcM 4mmar�aR pnxad a pudt,e�u�d¢xcd tfonmtlm. L--J (Q 'H. m Ory a A.—Cr—,.-W meha�..F--ws�N, z�uoa ny ae—C.W-x ,a —Y,a k!l a u nmdir—a!m Ll�nmaa 'may CD o m rW h— ne—�as a,�pr u 1,4 �,ea .�. it`y' LI111It$ Ill .rd s anQ�m raaaaadaauv m*r m aau ai bk— ,a—� CTiZ The CRY d rand,.a--W eOkm.b wthm Irne dam arty and al 1 npnxM .a,a--a - INN,b t, natf t,8.iaqlea—aaa (,J d sea±—Eaq re R—F..p.—,pn,p®e.Re OLy at rands L—ry. dur m6w a�nor,mu,e any mhmy,reiprdi at u mum for py m I,f Ills amr.nr».s a Inxcumtle In a,�„.—r prude .rdfQ o1)aq�- - Cr uvc"n---IV airy p—,eunQ upon v trdornunm—a—Wads !'. I j C �. ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budqet Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 4,840 Fringe Benefits 2,420 Subtotal - Personnel 7,260 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 Contract Services 1,770 O & M/General 8,990 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,990 Utilities: Electric Utilities 24,000 Assessment Administration 6,670 Admin./General Overhead 1,510 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 43,170 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 9,690 Total Expenditures Budget $ 60,120 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 514 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 43,710 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 490 Subtotal - Taxes 44,200 Transfer In Transfer In - General Fund 28,920 Total Revenues Budget 73,120 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 13,000 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 44,149.60 Total District EBU Count 1,276.00 Actual Assessment per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 34.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 34.60 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ (118,217) Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 13,000 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ (105,217) Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 515 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the debt service has been suspended due to the structural operating deficit and will be routinely monitored. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 516 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 517 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#15 Page 518 derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. The following table provides the weighting factors applied by land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $34.60 $34.60 1,276.00 1,276.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #15 Page 519 the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #15 Page 520 -nc/) m n City of Rancho Cucamonga C 32 M Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 � CD RANCHO ! €CUCAMOWU r.i _ _ ; " (Caryn Planned Community ,rt t ■ _ N 7 j O(Q j �.r._u.r.r._I�I_1_Irl�l_1 1_1_1 .rut I_IrI�Ir.�t; ■�_I_Irl_1_1_.rlrlr.r.r1_a_Ir�l_I r 1 i z N =5 (D Hillside Rd v F j Wilson Av M - ■ w n s " CD Banyan St •. F 0 i Z 19th St Cn I i C) m Base Line Rd e* 0 Base Line Rd 0 •�r D 0 o Foothill BI Foothill BI n c 0) Arrow Rt Arrow Rt o ! c� 8th St w 12 D a aUth S� Legend > 5 4th St' 4th 5t ■ D ■ i City Limits C7 tbl Ayd d. am geogmphk rnomean�'k acme by a.. .cuyn 7 7 7 7 71_1_li � mew��z�a,am«p aR pnexnled�a puuc--a�.1 � (Q ayaaa�a�n�m.na�mp��«.au bn�vaa.�e a SLID 5 to tIx mtrt.>c9�aa.amratL ars+Pletrn�«tlrtdlnea d arry lrf flan � IMf� � C L [Sj rfvvd�m Imu f:,err_ TIC,e Y� 4 not til upon 1k]riormrat>m f«.nr CD m as s m�e ramad�nnr +�*r mr Inc ai ��cm u��d Th Cty.0�O—W�k*.rd t l.n.v..n dwam..W a d di _ y NZ n ad vmnan� h.AA.W bU r Nml to the Implied--n a L 7 Miles d patladar purpmn..TIw ❑K f ladm Cu —g. _ any p rank mprd�a —u—u e for(1).n 5'L7J 1 0.5 0 1 envr� «Inaara�in a.Infonrntloo p dm a 0-ilir arty e<mn« naaion---v mr•m arty perms Isom upon>r�fnMmeam a..irx.e neren (.3l � ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $34.60 1,276.00 1,276.00 $44,149.60 Totals 1 1 1,276.001 1,276.001 $44,149.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #15 Page 522 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) Page 523 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 6 (COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 524 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 525 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 6 (Commercial Industrial) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 32,360 Operations and Maintenance 68,360 Debt Service 480,860 Transfer Out 15,170 Total Expenditures Budget 596,750 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 134,580 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,610 Subtotal -Taxes 136,190 Other Revenues 5,500 Total Revenues Budget 141,690 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (455,060) Total District EBU Count 2,644.67 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 51.40 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 526 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 527 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 528 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to, express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as the commercial and industrial area of the City which is generally bounded by Foothill Blvd on the north, 4th St on the south, East Ave on the east and Grove Ave on the west. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 529 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 530 -nc/) CD m City of Rancho Cucamonga � ro < Street Lighting Maintenance District No. G CD M Q T= RANCHO � ' � E U � � '-` (Commercial Industrial) N tucruadraw S 4 S 2 O� `- `—`--- ----- -- 1_. ■lae�_i_�_1_1.1.1.1 r�lAl.l_1_u��r 1/�� .�. lI m > N v r IY d ro N CD Hillside Rd ti L ro �. t } •Wilson Av v CD Banyati St � I 0 ti s• � Z L 0 19th St r rn Base Line Rd r•11 u o I • Base Line Rd h D - f _ n , n Foothill BI �� *• . _ ___ _� i _ —_ Foothill BI Arrow Rt i , .N �. , Arrow Rt • O • IL Sth St - - - i • s Legend 6th A � 10 I } Streetlights > 5 4th St't_ _- _ - - _--_�4tl�St a SLID 5 / The mp,dsm,an gmgmahk rl m Chrf nr ')"Labe try and erroagh � �= eh�aT a r�Rm n,am r�aR p oenb d as a paur �a�+lia tenon. _ Q -y cQ Tne bey a w�o,mnc p mahm�-ply M n_xlm ran yxn tae d CIt+ Limits to>k mrtr a,rmaa.amacw a ka —-nmiines a m,p Lf man C i4 C i {q CDC m ,Iron_ n,en nor�1 upm ac Limrmr I«am reason f4 {!1 ql N m c u.c� m.dmadenuy afv a^F ana hlmraam V—rvad hevn E g 4 } Y +. Cnz The CRY d R dro ar rya oOk"aM witlniR Fnmlmn dWn n any ad a iO M W� nqoaearms"mean mnrmng,bu r nmmd m,dr implm mnana (Ii S 1 a nrWemWlgq a ME for a pannrvar ma .Tha 4ty of P-1.Cumm>rap S tj ` 4} h k a m ate,r any INGILK r prd�a me manna ror p)ark S O �W Mlles ems crr,ar. t xmmrmra in am mfmrer>r aatlen ar4ra 01)arl'arson ar � trot__TN a�m am ce Y.s n:anm upm a=n,k na a.aime he do 1 0.5 0 1 ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 21,570 Fringe Benefits 10,790 Subtotal - Personnel 32,360 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 6,940 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 2,290 Contract Services 2,780 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 12,240 Utilities: Electric Utilities 45,000 Assessment Administration 5,610 Admin./General Overhead 5,510 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 68,360 Debt Service: Interest Expense 390 Principal Repayments 480,470 Subtotal - Debt Service 480,860 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 15,170 Total Expenditures Budget $ 596,750 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 532 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 134,580 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,610 Subtotal - Taxes 136,190 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 5,500 Total Revenues Budget 141,690 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (455,060) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 135,936.04 Total District EBU Count 2,644.67 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 51.40 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 51.40 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 497,835 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 (455,060) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 42,775 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 533 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the outstanding balance of the interfund loan will be paid off. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 534 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 535 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 536 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined, however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Non-Residential 1.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rate for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Non-Residential $51.40 $51.40 2,644.67 2,644.67 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the streetlights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#16 Page 537 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 538 -nw W_ CD m City of Rancho Cucamonga C � � Street Lighting Maintenance District No. G ` R,�",�HO E > (Commercial Industrial) CD(0 ■�.�.e.�.e.e�la.r�fi l=ul uu� erul Ir IMIM IF MIMI=iirlmlw'PC A N nCD Hillside Rd ! �, 3 I Wilson Av M ■ ■ w 0 L CD 0 Banyan St n r Z s 19th St rn Base Line Rd o Base Line Rd r n ° Foothill BI Foothill BI n c WArrow Rt Arrow Rt o ath 5t } s I....: D M�tl, S� Legend w /D� 4th A4t1� St ■ l, j City Limits me nqa,dam, 9-g phk Hmndlun(IilmrsY>r')avdlabk by.ne trough ure 8ry d fan<In�morr�a2 woawd as�pudt n�.urm d r�aa rf«meum. Q (Q T1.m ay d P.c a--pm —y -Tr rpc S L D G ��. a a F � CD m "h E U1Z m cry d E _ [6 W� npoecrws ab were Ircvary.ne mmby m ere IpplydtI��S e0 Fnodamhuy a n few f«a pa r pure.th, 0ryf of uY ' 1 a.6 0 1 d n ZF—e�nor amurz enr u bdty,r rl of d m .—e fu(1)am 2 O [z �S� rnuR mi>a�s«Inamrrade In am Inf-r -de arW«ill}ary « V! naaGbn—m any pcmr itlurm upm try GiMmabm at bu,natln ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessment for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Non-Residential $51.40 2,644.67 2,644.67 $135,936.04 Totals 1 1 2,644.671 2,644.671 $135,936.04 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0209-251-10 03/05/20 DRC2018-00711 4.60 4.60 MIND 0209-013-13& 14 09/16/20 DRC2018-00430 1.56 1.56 CO/IND 0207-262-28,35, 36,41, 42,45 and 46 11/04/20 DRC2018-00912 11.11 11.11 MIND 0209-211-24 1 12/02/20 1 DRC2018-00529 1 13.45 1 13.45 1 CO/IND Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #16 Page 540 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) Page 541 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 7 (NORTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 542 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 543 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7 ., 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the 1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 7 (North Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 23,040 Operations and Maintenance 106,990 Transfer Out 30,720 Total Expenditures Budget 160,750 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 128,820 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,610 Subtotal - Taxes 130,430 Other Revenues 2,070 Transfers In 29,400 Total Revenues Budget 161,900 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 1,150 Total District EBU Count 3,905.00 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 33.32 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 544 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 545 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 546 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as North Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Highland Ave on the south, Day Creek Channel on the west and City limits on the east and north. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 547 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #17 Page 548 -ncn v m City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 qOj RANCHO CUCAMONGA (North Etiwanda) N 7' O(Q N � � CD • pr ,.• f - 41 CD 0 + + •K r �• • rr j ` • i F Z •+` A itv4• r+Nrtiiir •• •r•+ +t+ ••_ ` t. Wilson Av D •r„ +�,,,r, • L • nNr+ • ;•, 4• >�: O • • ,+A+ • � • • t 4� 0 v �..._ t*sr,+- _ Banyan St ' •. 98*ft sew O �..�,.. U. LDoleo Legend l/ lbe nary,EaC;antl Ga�Yrawk blPnlurbn('mlormYbr'-)awk Vc A'a+o IMeuyi hie Qly d'Pardw Cuaimga arc Preswrmd as a W hk.soul¢d peical iMhrrtwlb. t pF 1.((�� FFes�., 2 lbP Qy ae Ranch Lumm'npa males mr irNls rd wartanG(,�aveaPna4.a rutee � � • Street Lly W u�+lRed m va+ncab. -me user irmin na nvr uPm me urornvnm nr amr reesm {(f m m h e m nde,mada,�dy m and brtabon �he eh. = w SLID 7 Boundary h Oryauaw m antlC Rieuu ax aA partLa b1rP w1m m❑[/Nd NenFtlio Ma nmwEn bacl M(lZ mW � 0 City LIn1t5eemabRy Cap miles,am � naclan m..lmc mo-m am�:en:.�nPe uPoi mlrrR.m�a,ahaa nereh. LU 0.55 0.25 I} 0.5 -4 Cn ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 15,360 Fringe Benefits 7,680 Subtotal - Personnel 23,040 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 50 O & M/General 4,940 Contract Services 5,630 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 10,800 Utilities: Electric Utilities 72,000 Assessment Administration 20,370 Admin./General Overhead 3,820 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 106,990 Transfer Out - General Street Lights Fund 30,720 Total Expenditures Budget $ 160,750 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #17 Page 550 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 128,820 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 1,610 Subtotal - Taxes 130,430 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 2,070 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 29,400 Total Revenues Budget 161,900 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ 1,150 Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 130,114.60 Total District EBU Count 3,905.00 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 33.32 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 33.32 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EDU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 179,702 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2021/22 1,150 Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 180,852 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 551 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the debt service has been suspended due to the structural operating deficit and will be routinely monitored. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 552 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) Hof the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 553 the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 554 When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Every other land-use is converted to EDUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land- use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EDU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EDU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EDU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#17 Page 555 Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Rate Asessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) per EBU Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $33.32 $33.32 3,905.00 3,905.00 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #17 Page 556 -ncn v L -Z < City of Rancho Cucamonga CD� eo Ln Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 RANCHO I_� v E C, Y (North ftiwanda) CD(0 _ 2 ID 2 c rNv D' I , D Hillside Rd i I j ti I I ,� Wilson Av 13) CD Banyan St .—r Z �+ 19th St • a n � m Base Line Rd U p Base Line Rd elf D n o Foothill BI Foothill BI n � c W Arrow Rt Arrow Rt 3 c0 8th St Iv } % .—..� D o 6th X Legend D 7 4th Sty— - 4th St SLD 7 Boundary nM P..:.aati<.aa—.*k nm�P.eW[•mr.PuahP•�.VPme w a,a naWa: } 7 ,�7.yy } �x7y -1 Limits tIC Clry IX Pantlq Cuaimp.ac PP hY1 a a W hk.sW�¢IX pelts l inbn�.lo.. "S "'4 I City (Q� mee.vnwnah cumimq.hues nhr.roie.nh ,m.ma.a.h avuwve. C C C i �— m m ,k= aW..n a�PaP� 0 pmMtra m wP naek. -me use vw.so<w.r .11 me nmrP.hon rur brc= O Y C (p ..e a mn*a w inxhma.w Nnrr+.r one an mxm.nm hrem W neen. _ _ mh av d L.Peq cus>nr.n.�.viv am,we-e k�u a�aPr PPa di _ q} UlZ a a a wPPaPmx h[Wny m� of imhea me iPp�wawmc q} i = (yl a.namahey am�v�m ier a peim.r wrn>az.rr ar'IX wnenhn v� = i MUM. a,n< �.��aa„ q = � � Miles V 4-�, ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Assessment Single Family Residential $33.32 3,905.00 3,905.00 $130,114.60 Totals 3,905.001 3,905.001 $130,114.60 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2021/22: Annexation Total Units/ Apn Date Project Name Acres Total EBUs Property Type 0225-122-84 06/04/20 DRC2018-00974 1.00 1.00 SFD 0226-102-30 08/06/20 SUBTT19917 10.00 10.00 SFD Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #17 Page 558 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) Page 559 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 8 (SOUTH ETIWANDA) 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 560 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGINEER'S LETTER 1 INTRODUCTION 3 Reason for Assessment 3 Process for Annual Assessment 3 PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4 Description of the Boundaries of the District 4 Description of Improvements and Services 4 Map of Improvements 5 ESTIMATE OF COSTS 7 District Budget 7 Definitions of Budget Items 9 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 10 Overview 10 Special Benefit 11 General Benefit 11 Method of Assessment Spread 11 ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 13 ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 15 Assessment Roll 15 Annexations 15 Page 561 ENGINEER'S LETTER WHEREAS, on July 7, 2021, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), under the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act") adopted its Resolution No. 21-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Street Light Maintenance District No. 8 (South Etiwanda) (the "District"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed the City Engineer to prepare and file an Annual Engineer's Report for Fiscal Year 2021/22 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act. The Annual Engineer's Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay for the acquisition of street lights, the installation of Light Emitting Diode (LED) street lighting, and estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment. Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services $ 29,940 Operations and Maintenance 47,160 Debt Service 248,220 Transfer Out 10,820 Total Expenditures Budget 336,140 Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 70,490 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 610 Subtotal - Taxes 71,100 Other Revenues 24,320 Total Revenues Budget 95,420 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (240,720) Total District EBU Count 2,326.78 Actual Assessment per EBU $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU $ 193.75 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 562 In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act: 1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer's Report (the "Specially Benefited Parcels"). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer's Report. 2. 1 have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefitted Parcels. In making such evaluation: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements; b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed. I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer's Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer's Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 563 INTRODUCTION Reason for Assessment Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer's Report will generate the revenue necessary to: Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer's Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements, the installation of LED street lighting, and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Process for Annual Assessment The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer's Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which: • Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein. • Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements. • Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District. • Refers to the Engineer's Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. • Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment. • States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year. If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 564 During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment. The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment. If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District. Description of the Boundaries of the District The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City known as South Etiwanda, which is generally bounded by Etiwanda Ave on the west, Highland Ave on the north and Foothill Blvd on the south. The southern portion of the District is bounded by East Ave on the east and the northern portion of the District is bounded by the 1-15 Freeway on the east. Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report. Description of Improvements and Services The improvements are the maintenance and servicing of street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. The maintenance and servicing includes, but is not limited to, furnishing electric current for public lighting facilities including street lights and traffic signals, and associated appurtenant facilities. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in operational and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, in order to lower expenses of the District. In Fiscal Year 2017/18, the acquisition by the City of the street lights and installation of LED street lighting specially benefiting the properties within the District has been added to the improvements. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 565 Map of Improvements The following page shows the map of street light and traffic signal improvements to be maintained using District funds. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 566 -nc/) CD m City of Rancho Cucamonga E7 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 m RANCHO (South Etiwanda) CI7G4MONGk — `— NLD. ■owes * •r■a'* 0 CCD • • ■ • a a* 1 * so r AIM a �• •**■•■ia• • l MP 0 • • r /^ Victoria Park Lane An n 3 +■. .a. z W ;•jai �a•i raarrr r • h•ahM■r a ■ a• 00 ••*Mai• •r•*• a••■••a■rt C7 :ate■n $ i .*Jae Z r �• o Base Line Rd •,iA*?' a) • O *•'~ � teary ••* • 16 .•* ■ ■ I w it��M �* = i • o Chruch St •tip•#* Let qA a . • W •�•`�� a..4�.�I•S Legend D r■ra*■•= •r*■ Rao .a■'� ; " . •. ■ Streetlights > .k .p,&E.,.e p-9..0k Hr r+ ,�,•, �t bW a.d tiv«gh SLID 8 / me dq d Aaieln C,mmorr�aie poa.m as a puNt ioou�d q�-d rfom.urn. I 0= i ne Oty d Ravo dmmnrr�nuke ru.rpllc rn ne.w V rd—du, r.m��.xmra,amrac�'aPldb�«nirdlnes d xry lrfOrtal.n ■ cQ o rk " ,--p d ' j City Limits m m Im Car ,�C- M, Ins.d��-d.9 Foothill BI • ■�•I (nZ �pleel�lic wd v.poly Indtplr9•bt r Il mttetl m,dw Impltl f..palde M� a—o tblq. ntr—I«a panln+ar plppme.m Oty W R do C—.np • v M1.l n�+ a �. any IWIWI p req rdhs al .mumm br pa.� j Mi le a -.«r -I..a,�n�m.v mn . t. P,zj& 1; ms 1�,« 0.3 0.15 0 6.3 .... ]2�r to r pr r wr,r.- ulbr Ix L,Irr�ra Lrr ..elletle hadn 00 M ESTIMATE OF COSTS The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 19,960 Fringe Benefits 9,980 Subtotal - Personnel 29,940 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: Training 180 Membership Dues 40 O & M/General 4,940 Contract Services 1,980 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 7,140 Utilities: Electric Utilities 26,000 Assessment Administration 8,290 Admin./General Overhead 5,730 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 47,160 Debt Service: Interest Expense 210 Principal Repayments 248,010 Subtotal - Debt Service 248,220 Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund 10,820 Total Expenditures Budget $ 336,140 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 568 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 70,490 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 610 Subtotal - Taxes 71,100 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 24,320 Total Revenues Budget 95,420 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (240,720) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 71,199.46 Total District EBU Count 2,326.78 Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 30.60 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 193.75 The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in Fiscal Year 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 2,130,564 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (240,720) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $ 1,889,844 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 569 Definitions of Budget Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the street lights, traffic signals, and appurtenant facilities throughout the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost to all particular departments and staff of the City, and consultants for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include installation of safety lights and other large improvements. Debt Service: This item includes the repayment of interest and principal to the City Capital Reserve Fund for the acquisition of street lights and installation of LED street lighting within the District. In Fiscal Year 2021/22, the outstanding balance of the interfund loan will be paid off. Transfer Out - General City Street Lights Fund: This item includes the cost for the replacement and installation of District owned street lights. These costs are incurred in the General City Street Lights Fund and reimbursed by the District. Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings and Developer Energizing Fees. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 570 METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Overview Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the public lighting facilities, including traffic signals. Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]. Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement". Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 571 Special Benefit The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District, and as such confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by: • improving the livability, safety, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and • ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and • providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access for properties within the District, and • providing beautification and overall enhancement to properties within the District. The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District; only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance. General Benefit In addition to the special benefits received by parcels within the District, there are derivative general benefits that are conferred on parcels outside the boundaries of the District which include: • the safety and visual enhancement of the area to persons or vehicles that may travel through the District However, it has been determined that these benefits are derivative and do not provide a direct benefit to parcels outside of the district that are not being assessed. Method of Assessment Spread Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements are identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements. When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 572 property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined, are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed. To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment. Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel Multi-Family Residential 1.00 Unit Non-Residential 2.00 Acre The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District: Maximum Allowable Actual Assessment Asessment Rate Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $193.75 $30.60 1,206.00 1,206.00 Multi-Family Residential 193.75 30.60 1,057.00 1,057.00 Non-Residential 193.75 30.60 31.89 63.78 Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#18 Page 573 The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the street lights and traffic signals is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report. ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Assessor of the County San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 574 -nc/) a) CD < City of Rancho Cucamonga Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 _ (South Etiwanda} CD cp ,. co Q v RANCHO .a: ( Y N 7 j I C = q 2 2 OCQ ; ■aa.a.a.a.a.t.t.,.t.1.1.1 1.1.E a.a.t ra.t.t.a�t; ■t.t.I as t.a^j.La.a.t.r.t aajwt.t�'� N v � ■s' ■ 1 N CO Hillside Rd ! t' i Wilson Av i — 1 0 W — � s U O Banyan St !� i i Zpr 19th St eD C� m Base Line Rd O Base Line Rd � ■r�r sv D i 0 ° Foothill BI Foothill Bi n c 0 wA f r ow Rt Arrow Rt O 7 D a th S� Legend L w _ __ D � 4th St 4th St ■■ t t i City Limits ntoe ,mm,as xw.pK nfaa,�ston f'e. r. , a.abt tV aim—gh 7 7 7 7 y 71.I.II �= atotyanazmnmro�a� �apaat��a4�rf«ma Q Q d 4 (Q� 11. m oq f PU b--p oat s« —�v r a-¢,arart« ��, «aa�nr$Q a�, �a�,an = _v SLID 8 CDmmya, rn— .tnryapmuz irfsaw r«any an Y orb t eoeub PdmrrclenW nafi'any am at ]nmrnaam P—� = E C (nZ The City d es Q fadrmwnp eolnmr am wrelrwe IrmuPn n darfarns arty arcs al E Q} R}}3 A--, reorex�x>an rd--a , in ry.br ra.umaed m,the larpued�.irarnt q1 L 7 U1 d n erd..b q�as Fi—far a p—,Parke.The 01r of ia,dn m an E at near aft nor Maur,: y UNItX,rap rd�ar trx moan-mr(1)am �` D L j 1 01.5 I] enori orr�-:v ina¢vrr�In xM Inf—n p—idmJ ardjQ(1i)—y 00 � iraamn—N airy perms lean-upon m tnf—ar b—rxren ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS Assessment Roll The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2021/22 actual assessments for the District: Actual Assessment Total Property Type (County Use Code) Rate per EBU Units/Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment Single Family Residential $30.60 1,206.00 1,206.00 $36,903.60 Multi-Family Residential 30.60 1,057.001 1,057.001 32,344.20 Non-Residential 1 30.60 31.89 63.78 1,951.66 Totals 1 2,294.89 2,326.78 $71,199.46 A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office. Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #18 Page 576 Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2021/22 City of Rancho Cucamonga Parks and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Page 577 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA PARKS AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Phone: 909.477.2700 Fax: 909.477.2849 CITY COUNCIL L. Dennis Michael, Mayor Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member Kristine D. Scott, Council Member Sam Spagnolo, Council Member CITY STAFF John R. Gillison, City Manager Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director Tamara L. Oatman, Finance Director Page 578 TABLE OF CONTENTS AUTHORITY FOR REPORT 1 FINDINGS 1 DISTRICT ANALYSIS 2 ESTIMATE OF WORK 3 District Budget 3 Definitions of Budget Items 5 METHOD OF SPREAD 6 Annexations 8 Boundary Map 8 Page 579 AUTHORITY FOR REPORT This report for the Fiscal Year 2021/22 is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City") and in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), being Division 15, Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways code. Provisions for this annual assessment are included in Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act. The purpose of this report is to set forth findings and the assessment analysis for the annual levy of assessments for the Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"). This District, using direct benefit assessments, was originally created to provide funds to finance the cost of construction, maintenance, operation and debt payment of Heritage Community Park and Red Hill Community Park in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Subsequently, the debt has been repaid with only the ongoing maintenance and operation with periodic capital improvement expenditures of the parks remaining. FINDINGS Section 22573 of the 1972 Act, requires assessments to be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states: The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. The means of determining whether or not a parcel will benefit from the improvements is contained in the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7, commencing with Section 5000 of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California). The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment district into benefit areas where, by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive differing degrees of all territory receiving substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements and may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. As the assessments are levied on the bases of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not a tax; and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIII A. Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the Federal government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed. Certain other parcels used for railroad mainline right-of-way, public utility transmission right-of-way, and common areas are also exempt from assessment. The assessment for mobile home parks will be based upon underlying lot acreage. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 580 DISTRICT ANALYSIS A. District Boundary The District includes all of the City of Rancho Cucamonga with the general exception of land east of Deer Creek Channel and the Victoria, Caryn and Terra Vista Planned Communities. All parcels of real property affected are more particularly described in maps prepared in accordance with Section 327 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, which are on file in the office of the San Bernardino County Assessor in the Hall of Records, 172 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California and which are hereby made a part hereof by reference. B. District Name City of Rancho Cucamonga Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85. C. Facilities The existing works within the District boundary are generally described as follows: 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizens facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 581 ESTIMATE OF WORK The 1972 Act permits carrying forward surpluses or recovering deficits in subsequent fiscal years. Costs for the district will be reviewed annually. Any surplus credited against assessment or any deficits shall be included in the assessment for the following fiscal year. District Budget Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Expenditures Personnel Services: Regular Salaries $ 157,770 Overtime Salaries 3,680 Fringe Benefits 78,640 Subtotal - Personnel 240,090 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 68,000 O & M/Facilities 2,500 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 8,500 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 1,000 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 80,000 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 302,860 Contract Services/Facilities 13,000 Tree Maintenance 26,210 Subtotal - Contract Services 342,070 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 3,940 Water Utilities 186,280 Electric Utilities 136,650 Subtotal - Utilities 326,870 Assessment Administration 144,590 Admin./General Overhead 54,780 Other Expenses 2,960 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 951,270 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay- Improvements Other Than Building 580,000 Captial Project 500,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 1,080,000 Transfers Out: Transfers Out- PD-85 Capital Reserve Fund 116,800 Total Expenditures Budget $ 2,388,160 Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 582 Fiscal Year 2021/22 Budget Revenues Taxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies $ 1,148,530 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 13,560 Subtotal -Taxes 1,162,090 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 31,990 Other Rental/Lease Income 124,010 Park Maintenance Fees 4,210 Sports Field User Group Rentals 110 Sports Lighting Fees 17,270 Other Revenue 100 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 177,690 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 99,990 Transfer In - PD-85 Operating Fund 116,800 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 22,480 Subtotal -Transfer In: 239,270 Total Revenues Budget 1,579,050 Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance $ (809,110) Total Gross Estimated Assessments $ 1,159,090.00 Total District EBU Count 37,390.00 Actual Assessment per EBU- Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 31.00 Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2021/22 $ 31.00 Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218. It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County of San Bernardino, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17, the City will maintain a Capital Reserve to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 583 The reserve balance information for the District is as follows: Operating Capital Total Reserve Reserve Reserve Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2021 $ 2,614,085 $ 471,743 $ 3,085,828 Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve- Fiscal Year 2021/22 (400,690) (408,420) (809,110) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance,June 30, 2022 $ 2,213,395 $ 63,323 $ 2,276,718 Definitions of Bud-get Items The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget: Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees. Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District. Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements. Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District. Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings. General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure. Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 584 Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking). METHOD OF SPREAD The 1972 Act indicates that assessments may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes costs among all lots or parcels within the District in proportion to the estimated benefit received. A. Definitions The District is divided into three categories for the purpose of determining the assessments as follows: CATEGORY A — includes parcels based on the number of existing residential units within certain ranges of parcel size. CATEGORY B — includes all parcels not defined in Category A or Category C CATEGORY C — includes exempt parcels. Exempt parcels are those parcels listed by the County Assessor's as exempt and/or which have an assessed value of less than $500. B. Formula The assessment formula is based on actual land use information contained in the current San Bernardino Assessor's computer files and Assessor's parcel maps. Category A: All parcels containing existing residential dwelling units and meeting the following conditions. Parcel Size/Ranee Dwelling Units/Parcel Less than 1.5 Acres and 1 or more dwelling units 1.51 to 3.5 Acres and 2 or more dwelling units 3.51 to 7.0 Acres and 4 or more dwelling units 7.01 to 14.0 Acres and 8 or more dwelling units 14.01 to 25 Acres and 15 or more dwelling units 25.01 Acres and larger 26 or more dwelling units Category A is based on the number of existing residential units. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 585 Category B: All parcels not defined in Category A or Category C. Category C: All exempt parcels as defined below: 1. All properties currently tax exempt; 2. All public ownership; 3. Railroad mainline right-of-ways; 4. Major utility transmission right-of-ways; 5. Mineral rights; 6. Parcels so small they currently cannot be built upon; 7. All normally assessable parcels within an assessed valuation of less than $500 and 1.5 acres or less; and, C. Summary of Preliminary Assessment Amounts Category A: The preliminary estimated assessment rate, which will be levied during the Fiscal Year 2021/22, is $31.00 per residential dwelling unit for those parcels in Category A. Category A parcels containing more than one residential dwelling unit will be assessed for an amount equal to $31.00 times the number of residential dwelling units. Category B: The assessment, which may be levied for parcels within Category B during the Fiscal Year 2021/22, shall be according to the following schedule: Definition Assessment Per Parcels Single Family Residential $31.00 Multi-Family Residential $31.00 Less than 1.5 Acres $15.50 1.51 Acres to 3.50 Acres $46.50 3.51 Acres to 7.0 Acres $108.50 7.01 Acres to 14.0 Acres $217.00 14.01 Acres to 25.0 Acres $434.00 25.01 Acres and larger $775.00 Category C: The assessment shall be $0.00 for Category C parcels. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT #19 Page 586 Annexations There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2021/22. Boundary Map An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the County Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report. Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 — City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2021/22 ATTACHMENT#19 Page 587 -n -a } City of Rancho Cucamonga ¢' Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 CD RANCHO '"ti V - I (Heritage and Red Hill Community Parks) N CUCAMONGA �..i > N n j I LJ 2 2 2 N CD iuvuuu�aar.�.rr r�ur uu� uu� r.ra<r.r�pa rf ■r.r.r.r.ur.a.p.p.prur.,.l��l.r�`~ � .t 1 ■�[ N N Hillside Rd i l'dilsall Av o u i N 3 Bdlly,111 St t rr CD � 4 N 19th St 0 Z Base Line Rd 2tk u Base Line Rd Cn C7 � Foothill BI Foothill BI 0 Arrow Rt Arrow Rt D n 0 8th St n > } a • v D 3 2 .ubth s� Legend 10 w y 4th Sty mim4th St ii City Limits (� w no nnap�ilift,>b grsprsphlc nyomwaa CWo '1"Loh by and dvoopn } }Y } }Y Limim,i T nc��r o[rmn<hP Qmmorr�m P�oaMd as a puNk ioow¢d¢scN H«m.tlrn. Y `� c0) or —ffiw n mn aka a�n pue�n a«an «g.Pneea P D-8 5 m ax army,xnrPenx,amrac.mrakmr�«nmdines d aqr Limraiwi [O C C L [if aorem a you isren. me roc d�na rely upon rre by n W anY rn.xn tB V7 G7 (U N CD m <d a send m ra=ndanw—fr�ane al Inf—mum r� ha4 Cn 1ne Cq d o gP erplkm4 arm r n I Irn—J--a T and" E CID iapioeMdsms ad,.aane� in�mrg,ht nx nm�m.ehe Impl�f ratnarmes V L �Vi112S �� a mmoneoangv my Fen—I«a Pnru oar pm�e.Trr cry d rr,dv comn.� = 4] V non r e PP es. enr u.ar�-g rd�.r u,a.—d—ror py Pm 2 Ltl 1 0.5 0 1 enory Pa�c a Inaca races In aw Inf--Prodao wqr (II)"max,« �' remoa—sr"a-m airy perms boa¢upm a 4Aomuttra a,alhtle naen CO (O RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3113, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022 ("Fiscal Year 2021/22"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2021/22. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 1 ATTAC jKNT #20 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each such report, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been allocated within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2021/22; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 2 ATTAghtMA JT #21 D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection; SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Reports. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this _day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 2 ATTACpLIMA IT #21 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 IN LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 313, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 AND 10, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 and 10, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2021/22 Annual Engineer's Report" (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires the City Council, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. The improvements include, but are not limited to, turf, ground cover, planter beds, shrubs, plants and trees, landscape lighting, irrigation systems, electrical energy for irrigation controllers, hardscapes, entry signs, sound walls, and all associated appurtenant facilities. A description of the specific improvements to be maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 5 ATTA%tMA JT #22 "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and (b) water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2021/22 have been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order, the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 21S' day of July, 2021 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 5 ATTA%tMA JT #22 Tamara Oatman Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 774-2430 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this_day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 3 of 5 ATTAghtMAJ IT #22 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Engineer's Report for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Community Trails Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Parks, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and Don Tiburcio Tapia Park (undeveloped) Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Entry Monuments Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park and Windrows Park Landscape Maintenance District No. 313 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Entry Monuments Metrolink Landscape Maintenance District No. 4-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Parks: Spruce Park, Mountain View Park, Ralph M. Lewis Park, Coyote Canyon Park, Milliken Park and West Greenway Park Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 4 of 5 ATTA%jMAtIT #22 Landscape Maintenance District No. 5 Landscaping: Andover Park at Andover and Bedford (includes ground cover only) Landscape Maintenance District No. 6-R Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Landscape Maintenance District No. 7 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Parks: Etiwanda Creek Community Park Landscape Maintenance District No. 8 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Paseos Street Trees Community Trails Landscape Maintenance District No. 9 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Parks: Garcia Park Landscape Maintenance District No. 10 Landscaping: Parkways (includes turf and ground cover) Median Islands (includes turf and ground cover) Street Trees Community Trails Parks: Day Creek Park Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 5 of 5 ATTA%jMAjIT #22 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed certain maintenance districts pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, at this time, the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to authorize the proposed new improvements and provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the Districts; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022 ("Fiscal Year 2021/22"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained and serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2021/22. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for each District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of Article 3 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Reports. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for each District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 1 ATTA%tMA IT #23 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a separate report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report") in certain maintenance assessment districts known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each, a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council a separate Annual Engineer's Report for each District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed each Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in each report, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been spread within each District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for each District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2021/22; C. A diagram for such District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 2 ATTAChtMAb1T #24 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Reports. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 2 ATTACpLIMA JT #24 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NOS. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 AND 8, INCLUSIVE, AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed certain maintenance districts and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what are known and designated as Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8, inclusive (each a "District" and collectively, the "Districts"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within each District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for each District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2021/22 Annual Engineer's Report" (each, an "Annual Engineer's Report" and collectively, the "Annual Engineer's Reports") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act(Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the"Implementation Act")(the 1972 Act,Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within each District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 proposed to be levied within each District as set forth in the applicable Annual Levy Report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 within such District are not deemed to be"increased"over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires the City Council, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within each District for the continual maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within each such District. The improvements include, but are not limited to, street lights, traffic signals and appurtenant facilities related thereto. A description of the specific improvements to be acquired, maintained and serviced within each District is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 4 ATTAghtK JT #25 The maintenance of the improvements includes the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement. Service includes the furnishing of electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any improvement. Reference is made to the applicable Annual Engineer's Report for further information regarding the improvements to be acquired, maintained and serviced for each District and the scope of such maintenance and service. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Reports regarding the annual levy for each District for Fiscal Year 2021/22 have been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the Office the City Clerk. Reference is made to the applicable such report for each District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order, the annual levy of assessments for each District as set forth and described in the applicable Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of Districts. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for each District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon each such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. Each such District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 21St day of July, 2021 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Tamara Oatman Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 774-2430 Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 4 ATTAC tWNT #25 SECTION 8. Notice. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 3 of 4 ATTAghtW JT #25 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements This Appendix A contains general descriptions of the improvements to be maintained and serviced within each of the Districts. Please refer to the Annual Engineer's Report for a full and complete description of the maintenance and service to be provided for each District. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 1 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on arterial streets that are throughout the City. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 2 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets that are generally west of Haven Avenue. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 3 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Victoria Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 4 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Terra Vista Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 5 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located within the Caryn Planned Community. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 6 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals located on commercial and industrial streets throughout the City but that are not within an existing local maintenance district. This area is located generally south of Foothill Boulevard. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 7 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "North Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Day Creek Channel and north of Highland Avenue. Street Lighting Maintenance District No. 8 The installation/maintenance of street lights and traffic signals on local streets within this area of the City is known as "South Etiwanda". This area is located generally east of Etiwanda Avenue, north of Foothill Boulevard and south of Highland Avenue. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 4 of 4 ATTAghtW JT #25 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE PREPARATION OF THE ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ASSESSMENT LAW FOR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT LEVY WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously undertaken proceedings to form and has formed that certain maintenance district pursuant to pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act"), known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time the City Council desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to Chapter 3 of the 1972 Act to provide for the annual levy of assessments for the next ensuing fiscal year to provide for the annual costs for maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, the proceedings for the annual levy of assessments shall relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2021 and ending June 30, 2022 ("Fiscal Year 2021/22"). NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. New Improvements or Substantial Changes in Existing Improvements. No new improvements are proposed to be added to the improvements to be maintained or serviced and no substantial changes in the existing improvements are proposed to be made for Fiscal Year 2021/22. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The City Engineer is hereby ordered to prepare and file with this City Council an Annual Engineer's Report for the District relating to such annual assessment and levy in such District in accordance with the provisions of 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"). SECTION 4. Filing of the Annual Engineer's Report. Upon completion, the Annual Engineer's Report for the District shall be filed with the City Clerk, who shall then submit the same to this City Council for its consideration pursuant to the Assessment Law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 1 ATTA%jWtIT #26 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, pursuant to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), did, by previous Resolution, order the preparation of a report for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 (the "Annual Engineer's Report") in a certain maintenance assessment district known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this City Council the Annual Engineer's Report for the District as required by the Assessment Law and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, this City Council has now examined and reviewed the Annual Engineer's Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth in such report, and is satisfied that the assessments, on a preliminary basis, have been allocated within the District in accordance with the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained and serviced, as set forth in the Annual Engineer's Report. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY RESOLVES, SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Annual Engineer's Reports. The Annual Engineer's Report for the District as presented, consisting of the following: A. Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and the extent of such maintenance; B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the District for Fiscal Year 2021/22; C. A diagram for the District, showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed; and D. An annual assessment for Fiscal Year 2021/22 of the estimated costs of the maintenance and servicing of those improvements to be maintained and serviced during such Fiscal Year, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within such District in proportion to the special benefits received is hereby approved on a preliminary basis and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open for public inspection. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 2 ATTA%jMAtJT #27 SECTION 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of the Annual Engineer's Report. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 2 ATTA%jMA j4T #27 RESOLUTION NO. 2021-XXX RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO PROVIDE FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021/22 WITHIN PARK AND RECREATION IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. PD-85 AND SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, has previously formed that certain maintenance district and authorized the levy of assessments therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (commencing with Section 22500) (the "1972 Act") in what is known and designated as Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (the "District"); and WHEREAS, this City Council has initiated proceedings to provide for the annual levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22, to finance the costs and expenses necessary for continued maintenance and servicing of improvements within the District; and WHEREAS, at this time, there has been presented and approved by this City Council, a separate report for the District identified by the distinctive designation of such District and entitled "Fiscal Year 2021/22 Annual Engineer's Report" (the "Annual Engineer's Report") as required pursuant to Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the 1972 Act, Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIIID") and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following) (the "Implementation Act") (the 1972 Act, Article XIIID and the Implementation Act are referred to collectively as the "Assessment Law"), and this City Council desires to conduct the proceedings to authorize the levy of the annual assessments within the District; and WHEREAS, the annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 proposed to be levied within the District as set forth in the report do not exceed the annual assessments as previously authorized to be levied within such District and, therefore, the proposed levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2021/22 within such District are not deemed to be "increased" over the maximum authorized annual assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. Improvements and Maintenance and Servicing Thereof. The public interest and convenience requires the City Council, and it is the intention of this City Council, to undertake proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments within the District for the continued maintenance and servicing of the improvements authorized to be maintained and serviced within such District. "Maintenance" may include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement, including: (a) repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement; (b) providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury; (c) the removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; and, (d) the cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti. "Service" may include the furnishing of: (a) electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for the lighting or operation of any improvements; and, (b)water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 1 of 3 ATTAC tWNT #28 A description of the improvements to be maintained and the maintenance and services to be provided is set forth in Appendix A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. Annual Engineer's Report. The Annual Engineer's Report regarding the annual levy for the District for Fiscal Year 2021/22, has been preliminarily approved and directed to be filed in the office the City Clerk. Reference is made to such Report for the District for a full and detailed description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced, the boundaries of such District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within such District. SECTION 4. Assessment. The public interest and convenience requires, and it is the intention of this City Council to order, the annual levy of assessments for the District as set forth and described in the Annual Engineer's Report, and further it is determined to be in the best public interest and convenience to levy and collect annual assessments to pay the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service as estimated in such Annual Engineer's Report. SECTION 5. Boundaries of District. The proposed maintenance and service work as described in the Annual Engineer's Report for the District is, in the opinion of this City Council, of special benefit to the properties within the boundaries of such District, and this City Council makes the costs and expenses of such maintenance and service chargeable upon such District, which District said City Council hereby declares to be the District specially benefited by such maintenance and service, and to be further assessed pursuant to the Assessment Law to pay the costs and expenses thereof. The District shall include each and every parcel of land within the boundaries thereof; as such District is shown on a map or maps as approved by this City Council and on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and so designated by the name of such District. SECTION 6. Public Hearing. Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held the 21st day of July, 2021, at the hour of 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting of the City Council, being in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California, which is the time and place fixed by this City Council for the hearing of protests or objections in reference to the annual levy of assessments, to the extent of the maintenance, by any interested person and any other matters contained in this resolution. Any persons who wish to object to the proceedings for the annual levy should file a written protest with the City Clerk prior to the time set and scheduled for said public hearing. SECTION 7. For Information Regarding Proceedings. For any and all information relating to the proceedings, protest procedure, any documentation and/or information of a procedural or technical nature, your attention is directed to the below listed person at the City: Tamara Oatman Finance Director City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 (909) 774-2430 SECTION 8. Notice.The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish, pursuant to Government Code Section 6061, a copy of this Resolution in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation within said City, said publication shall be made one time and not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the Public Hearing. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 2 of 3 ATTAghtWbIT #28 Appendix A Descriptions of Improvements and Maintenance and Services This Appendix A contains a general description of the improvements to be maintained and serviced and a description of such maintenance and services. 1. The maintenance and operation of Heritage Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, restrooms, equestrian facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, athletic facilities, and walking, jogging and equestrian trails and sanitary sewer connections. 2. The maintenance and operation of Red Hill Community Park including, but not limited to, grading, planting, irrigation, onsite roads, sidewalks, parking lots, lighting, waterscape, restrooms, senior citizen facilities, playground equipment, picnic facilities, major lighted athletic facilities, jogging trail, sanitary sewer connections and onsite drainage inlets. Resolution No. 2021-XXX— Page 3 of 3 ATTAghtW JT #28 A h 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: Public Hearing to Consider an Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Approve SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020- 00087 — Orbis Real Estate Partners, This Project Consists of a Request to Develop a New Commercial Building with a Service Station and Convenience Store Within the General Industrial (GI) District at the Southwest Corner of Archibald Avenue and 91h Street on Property Addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue; APN: 0209-032-35. The Planning Commission's Approval of the Project Qualified as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332. If the City Council Denies the Project, the Project is Exempt under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(4) as a Project which is Disapproved by the City. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council open the public hearing on the appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to approve SUBTPM20164, DRC2020-00138 and DRC2020-00087, receive oral testimony, and continue the public hearing to its next meeting in order to provide the applicant with an opportunity to respond to the new evidence provided in this report. BACKGROUND: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial (GI). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi- tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping). This existing building is proposed to remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco Company) which proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41 — On-sale Beer and Wine— Eating Places License). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The driveway entrance and parking lot of the existing multi-tenant commercial building at the southern portion of the property is proposed to be reconfigured because of this project. Page 610 On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the application, which in addition to the entitlements listed in the title above, also included a request for a conditional use permit to allow off-sale alcohol related to the convenience store (Type 20— Beer and Wine), and a corresponding request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) as the census tract within which the property is located is overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses. At that meeting, the Commission voted to deny the CUP for off-sale alcohol sales, citing the existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses within the census tract as well as the proximity of the project to nearby schools as justification. Staff notes that these concerns were also shared by members of the public. At the same meeting, the Commission identified several other concerns with the project, some of which were again shared by members of the public. These concerns included: • Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see the proposed use expand fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents; • Signage and Exterior Illumination: commissioners expressed concern that exterior illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the street; • Equity: several commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the Southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a convenience store and restaurant would further burden the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood when a grocery store is needed to ameliorate the food desert in the area.; • Concentration of Service Stations: commissioners also noted a perceived concern related to the number of service stations located within proximity to the proposed project. In response to the Commission's stated concerns, the applicant revised the project to incorporate the following changes: 1. To improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales were replaced with fresh food areas; 2. To address concerns from the commission regarding exterior lighting and signage, lighting and signage was now proposed to be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald frontage shall be either externally illuminated or "halo" lit, to minimize any impacts and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be illuminated; 3. In response to the commission's concerns regarding this project being a high-quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant also revised the project to include: a. Electric Vehicle charging stations — the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each; b. If the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline; c. The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and install appropriate drought tolerant landscaping. Page 2 Page 611 4. Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the sale of tobacco, the applicant agreed to not advertise any tobacco or tobacco related products along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco related products will be located behind the cashier's counter within the store, so as not to be easily accessible by minors. The Planning Commission reviewed this item with the proposed changes listed above on May 12, 2021. From the outset, the Planning Commission was divided in their reasoning and unclear in their discussion about impacts, or lack thereof; multiple questions were raised by Commissioners which were not able to be addressed either due to time or lack of notice. Among the discussion points and concerns discussed at the May 12 meeting, questions were raised by commissioners about the health impacts of the project, including how it was designed, will operate and whether the applicant was truly selling fresh foods, if so to what degree, and would that continue permanently or be phased out. Further, as was noted in the discussion, this project has the potential for significant and material effects on the quality of life within the City and adjacent area that the Council may wish to review and discuss. The Planning Commission voted to approve the project by a vote of 3 in favor, and 2 against without any additional conditions beyond those proposed by staff. On May 19, 2021, the City Council appealed the project for further consideration by a vote of 4 in favor and 1 against. ANALYSIS: Healthy Development Checklist/Healthy Food Retailer: Specifically, discussion at the May 12, 2021 meeting ensued as to whether or not the project meets the intent of the Healthy Development Checklist. The Healthy Development Checklist ("Checklist"), published by the Riverside University Health System, "...was developed to provide criteria for healthy development practices in the Inland Empire. It is intended to be used as a tool to judge the overall health performance and supportiveness of new development projects. While not every criterion will apply to every development project, projects should aim to comply with as many of the criteria as possible to promote health through their development project." The Checklist focuses on six "topic areas," which include: 1) Active Design; 2) Connectivity; 3) Public Safety;4) Environmental Health; 5)Community Cohesion; and 6)Access to Food, Services and Jobs. The Checklist further provides 30 focus items which include criteria by which projects are intended to meet in order to comply with the checklist. In response to the Commission's inquiries from May 12, staff has analyzed the project's compliance with the Checklist. Notably, the majority of focus items contained within the Checklist are not applicable to this specific project, as they apply to other types and scales of development projects. However, staff has listed below certain areas of concern within the Healthy Development Checklist which closely reflect certain concerns expressed throughout the development review process, and in particular those concerns raised by certain Commissioners at the May 12 Planning Commission meeting. • Pedestrian Environment (Active Design): The Checklist notes that "walking is positively corelated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Perceptions matter: the extent to which a neighborhood is perceived as walkable is correlated with residents' likelihood of participating in regular physical activity. A quality pedestrian environment also creates a physical Page 3 Page 612 and psychological buffer between pedestrians, bikes and cars..." The Checklist proceeds to provide certain criteria to be included in a project in order to fulfill its intent. Criteria includes, in part, pedestrian signals, in-pavement flashing lights, legible signage and wayfinding information, street trees planted between the vehicle and travel way at intervals no more than 50 feet, etc. The proposed project meets minimum City standards by constructing a new sidewalk, curb and gutter at 9th Street along the frontage of the project, as well as new landscaped parkways with new street trees along both frontages of the project. In addition, the project proposes new pathways connecting the pedestrian realm with the interior of the site and the proposed building. However, the project proposes a vehicle-oriented use (service station) adjacent to a residential neighborhood and within proximity to schools. The public improvements offered as part of the project are minimum City standards and do not specifically improve the Pedestrian Environment as called for by the Healthy Development Checklist. Further, introducing such a vehicle-oriented use as a service station across the street from residential uses and within proximity to schools, especially without the inclusion of pedestrian-oriented design features, does not improve the walkability of the area. Rather, such a use would induce additional vehicular traffic which could result in negative impacts to the pedestrian environment. • Frontage Design (Active Design): This item on the Checklist provides criteria which encourages buildings to have primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street or public open spaces. Criteria for this item also encourages appropriately scaled buildings, and parking lots which are located away from streets. As with the Pedestrian Environment parameter described above, the purpose of this parameter is to improve neighborhood safety, physical activity opportunities, and aesthetics. Easy to access buildings make it easier to get around by walking and biking and buildings oriented towards the street help implement CEPTED neighborhood safety best practices by providing "eyes on the street" through open spaces and fields of vision from within the building. While the project provides an appropriately-scaled building with the primary parking field located opposite the building from Archibald Avenue, the building provides no primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street. The project does provide one entrance on the north side of the building, but this entrance is oriented towards and provides access to the restaurant's outdoor patio. Staff notes that a primary entrance facing Archibald Avenue had been requested by staff throughout the development review process, but that the applicant neglected to include this element of design as they cited loss-prevention concerns for 7-Eleven. Further, while the project proposes a large landscaped setback and a private patio for use by patrons of the restaurant, the project provides no usable public open spaces. Thus, the project does not meet the intent of the Checklist with regard to Frontage Design. • Environmental Justice (Environmental Health): Throughout the development review process, both members of the public as well as certain Commissioners have questioned whether or not the proposed use is the most appropriate use for this location, considering the site's proximity to existing residential across Archibald Avenue, as well as the project's proximity to two schools, Cucamonga Page 4 Page 613 Elementary and Rancho Cucamonga Middle School. In particular, some concerns involved the proximity of a service station being located so close to an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School). More generally, the project is located within Southwest Cucamonga, an area of the City which has been identified as a disadvantaged community according to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). Data collected from the Census Bureau's American Community Survey illustrates these inequities historically observed between Southwest Cucamonga and the rest of the City. For example, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, and which is located entirely within Southwest Cucamonga, falls well below the City's average Median household income ($92,773 Citywide; $74,592 for Census Tract 21.05). Poverty rates are also much higher (7.5% Citywide; 14.1% for Census Tract 21.05), with Citywide poverty rates for children and seniors even further exacerbated (6% and 8%, respectively, Citywide; 14% and 19%, respectively, within the census tract). The Checklist states that "...the negative impacts of the built environment disproportionately impact disadvantaged communities, including higher instances of respiratory disease, cancer, obesity, and developmental diseases. Community design, together with planning decisions, can play a key role in making these communities healthier and mitigating the impacts of existing land use patterns and transportation investments in the region." The Checklist goes on to provide criteria which encourages that projects "minimize exposure to hazardous contaminants, including contaminated soils, pesticides, contaminated groundwater, and emissions by not siting residential development near or in the path of exposure sites..." Further, the Checklist provides criteria which encourages projects to "minimize development of sensitive land uses — defined as schools, hospitals, residences, and elder and childcare facilities— near air pollution sources..." The applicant proposes to locate a 14-pump service station with a convenience store within an identified disadvantaged community, and within close proximity to an elementary school and a residential neighborhood. Considering the site context of the project, in particular the status of the census tract as a disadvantaged community, staff feels that the concerns shared by members of the community and Commissioners over the appropriateness of the location of the project have been corroborated. Staff notes that the applicant has submitted an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, Revised 2021)which states that the project will not result in any significant impacts to air quality or greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). However, staff notes that the Healthy Development Checklist discourages the siting of"exposure sites" within proximity to residential development in order to minimize soils and ground water contaminations. In this case, the applicant proposes to site a 14-pump service station within proximity to residential uses and schools. Despite the applicant's analysis which states that there would be no significant impact to air quality or greenhouse gas emissions, dedicating the site to a service station in the long term may result in the potential of soils contamination which may also adversely impact the potential for the site to redevelop in the future into a use which might be more appropriate to the surrounding neighborhood. Generally, staff has Page 5 Page 614 observed that the redevelopment of sites previously utilized as service stations is very costly and difficult for developers to achieve often due to the need to remediate soils contamination. In short, encumbering the site in the long term may result in the property becoming a "brownfield site" which will be costly and difficult to redevelop in the future to a more appropriate use. Furthermore, while the Air Quality Study did not conclude a significant impact, the CEQA Thresholds do not address the inequitable challenges faced by residents in disadvantaged communities, especially those, such as Southwest Cucamonga, that are already shouldering a heavier air pollution burden. Current CEQA tools do not provide a framework for addressing potential inequities of air pollution. However, adding an automobile-oriented use, such as a gas station, in an area of the city where the community has expressed concerns about exacerbating environmental impacts is an environmental justice issue. • Grocery (Access to Food, Jobs, and Services): At the May 12 meeting, certain Commissioners questioned the applicant's stated objective that the use would function similar to a small grocery store for the benefit of the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner's questioned the quality of retail items, what percentage of the items would consist of pre-packaged food, and how the "lab store" concept would differ, or not, from a standard convenience store. Regarding groceries, the Checklist provides the following criteria that a grocery/produce type of project would be expected to incorporate in order to achieve compliance: 1) A neighborhood market within the project design, or; 2) a public, multi-use space that allows for food markets, or; 3)access to a "full-service" grocery store within reasonable walking distance. The Checklist provides that a full-service grocery store would include meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables. As previously noted, the proposed project has been described to staff as being a new"lab store"concept, which is a re-branding of the traditional convenience store model. This lab store concept provides offerings such as made-to-order coffee drinks, cold-pressed juices, smoothies and agua frescas. Also available are novelty beverages on tap such as nitro cold brew, kombucha and organic tees. The concept also includes a "cold treats bar" with frozen yogurt and ice cream, as well as cookies and baked goods which are baked in-store daily. In comparing the offerings of the lab store concept with the Checklist's criteria, while the project incorporates a market into the design, it does not meet the criteria for a full-service grocery store. For example, the lab store concept appears to omit any substantial offerings of meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables. Nor does the project incorporate a public, multi-use space that allows for food markets. Further, to date, staff remains unclear as to what extent pre-packaged food constitutes the percentage of retail items for sale as part of the lab store concept. Finally, in working with other grocers since the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission hearing, Staff has learned that full-service grocery stores typically have a minimum size of 20,000 square feet, which is substantially greater than proposed for this convenience store. Over the last several weeks, staff has worked to better understand the fresh food offerings at other 7-Eleven Lab Stores and have found a very small portion of the store devoted to fresh and healthy food. Page 6 Page 615 • Healthy Food (Access to Food, Jobs, and Services): Similar to the "Grocery" section above, the Checklist also considers how well a project maintains a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers. As a disadvantaged community where statistics show that families have a lower median income and where poverty rates are higher than elsewhere in the City, Southwest Cucamonga lacks certain community serving uses, such as grocery stores. According to the California Department of Public Health, "Lower income families are less likely to have a nutritious diet than those with higher incomes. People's food choices and their likelihood of being overweight or obese are...influenced by their food environment. A popular measure of healthy and less healthy food availability in a given geographic area-including distance to food retailers, cost of foods, or density of good outlets— is the modified Retail Environment Food Index (mREFI), which is a ratio of fast—food restaurants and convenience stores compared to supermarkets, produce markets, and farmer's markets. Presence of fast food retailers has a negative effect on diets and diet related health outcomes." In short, ease of access to food influences people's eating choices. If healthy food is unavailable or harder to access, people will tend to choose unhealthy food. Accordingly, the Checklist establishes criteria to achieve compliance with Healthy Food objectives. This criteria includes restricting fast food retailers within '/2 mile of schools, and managing the allowance of fast food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy foods retailers to unhealthy food retailers. According to the City's business license data, there are 53 food retailers within Census Tract 21.05 and within '/2 mile of the tract boundary. Of these, only 3 are considered "healthy" retailers, which include supermarkets and larger grocery stores, fruit and vegetable markets, and warehouse clubs. Less healthy food retailers included fast food, restaurants, convenience stores, and small grocery stores. The Healthy Development Checklist identifies four scores. Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have "poor access" to healthy retail food, scores between 5 and 10 are considered to have "fair access," scores above 10 to 25 are considered to have "good access," and scores above 25 are considered to have "high access." This Census Tract's mREFI score is 5.6. Permitting the proposed service station with a convenience store would not comply with "Healthy Food" on the Checklist as it would: 1) locate a fast food retailer within '/2 mile of schools; and 2) it would further exacerbate that disparity of healthy and unhealthy retailers within Census Tract 21.05. Additional Concerns: Throughout the development review process, several concerns had been raised by members of the public, staff and Planning Commissioners. In fact, staff originally recommended denial of the whole project at the February 24, 2021 meeting, but the Planning Commission only denied the portion of the Conditional Use Permit relative to off-sale alcohol sales at that time. Based on the May 12 discussion with the Planning Commission, and despite the Commission's approval of the project, remaining issues continue to include: 1) perceived concentration of service stations and convenience stores; 2) hours of operation and concerns of increases in crime; 3) and the general appropriateness of the project at this location and the desirability of new and expansion of existing service stations as a land use in the City_ The City Council may wish Page 7 Page 616 to consider these issues as part of this appeal. Perceived Concentration of Service Stations and Convenience Stores: During two neighborhood meetings held for the project in November 2020 and January 2021, as well as the public hearing held on February 24, 2021, members of the public expressed concerns that there already exist a high number of service stations within the vicinity of the project site. Staff acknowledges that there is no "concentration ordinance" which prohibits the number of services stations, however four service stations presently exist within one mile of the project site (Valero Station, 8514 Vineyard, 76 Station at 10075 Arrow Route, Kwik Sery at 9524 Foothill Boulevard, and Shell Gas at 7996 Archibald Avenue) and a fifth service station about '/4 of a mile to the north of the project site at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue was approved as part of DRC2015- 00682 in July 2018 to redevelop an existing abandoned service station. Notably, the proposed service station at Archibald Avenue and 9th Street would also be the largest service station within the vicinity as it would offer 14 pumps. The other stations listed above provide anywhere between 4 pumps (Arrow and Archibald location)to 12 pumps (Valero and 76). Attachment 3 provides the location of service stations within the project vicinity. Staff notes for the Council's consideration that each of these service stations include off-sale alcohol. Hours of Operation and Concerns of Increases in Crime: At the November 2020 and January 2021 neighborhood meetings, as well as at the February 24 public hearing on this item, multiple residents raised concerns regarding potential impacts associated with the proposed hours of operation, including an increase in crime and noise. Staff notes that the proposed convenience store and service station will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the Laredo Taco Company proposing hours of 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM, 7 days a week. Based on staff's preliminary analysis using data provided by the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, total calls for service of any kind at service stations in the City have generally increased since 2016. There were 637 calls for service at service stations in 2016 compared to 1,059 calls for service at service stations in 2020. Data for 2021 is incomplete but as of June 2021 there have been 135 calls for service, which includes two homicides at service stations with convenience stores. Over that 5-year period, this equates to an average of about 924 calls for service per year. When analyzing existing 7-Eleven's throughout the City, staff discovered that there have been over 600 calls for service, with more than 100 police reports prepared within the past two and a half years. The chart below highlights calls for service by existing 7-Eleven location. Location Calls for Service Number of Reports 10477 Alta Loma Drive 69 13 7900 Haven Avenue 229 34 8118 Masi Drive 56 14 9464 Base Line Road 36 3 9638 Milliken Avenue 219 44 Notably, of the five existing 7-Eleven's, only the 7-Eleven on Alta Loma Drive contains a service station. As such, it is reasonable to assume that the proposed project would result in criminal activity most similar to this location; however, it should be noted that Staff is not sure why the Haven and Milliken locations have such high calls for service. We are unable at this time to say definitively that the Archibald and 9th Street location might not have similar concerns. In analyzing this data, it is clear that calls for service corroborate the residents' perception of crime potentially Page 8 Page 617 increasing as it relates to this type of use. Service Station Moratorium: As previously noted, there is no "concentration ordinance" within the Development Code which prohibits the number of service stations within the City. However, 32 service stations currently exist within the City and the Planning Department has recently received several inquiries regarding new service stations and the expansion of existing service stations. The frequency of these inquiries has raised the need to analyze such land uses and their benefits to the community, or lack thereof. Consequently, on April 21, 2021, the City Council adopted an Urgency Moratorium, along with an extension on June 2, 2021, to provide adequate time for staff to analyze impacts related to the construction of new service stations and expansion of existing service stations. Topics of concern which staff is researching with regard to the service station moratorium include: • The number and location of existing service stations in the City; • Analysis of the land use benefits of service stations to the community; • Analysis of the fiscal benefits of service stations and how this compares to other retail uses; • Land use impacts of service stations on the surrounding commercial districts and/or residential neighborhoods; • Costs to the City of providing service at service station locations, particularly calls for public safety services; • Land use policies that will be included in the "PlanRC" General Plan update; • Possible performance stations andVor conditions that could be placed on service station projects in the future. As of the writing of this report, the moratorium on service stations expires on April 20, 2022. Staff continues to investigate the various concerns listed above related to the moratorium. Notably, while the subject service station was exempted from this moratorium provided that the developer obtain entitlements and building permits by October 21, 2021, a number of the concerns with regard to the moratorium also exist with the proposed service station project as have been discussed in this report. Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087: Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations which can include convenience stores. Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164: The project includes a proposal to subdivide the existing subject parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9th Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Conclusion: For the reasons and evidence stated in this report, staff recommends that the City Page 9 Page 618 Council overturn the Commission's approval and deny the Minor Design Review and Conditional Use Permit related to the application, while recommending that the City Council uphold Planning Commission's decision to approve the Tentative Parcel Map. Staff acknowledges that this is contrary to staff's recommendation to approve the project which was provided to the Planning Commission on May 12, but staff has conducted a more exhaustive analysis of this project in light of comments received at the Planning Commission meeting and has identified additional evidence pertinent to the project as a result of that analysis, particularly relating to crime statistics, gas station concentrations, and consistency with the HealthyRC policies. Given that this recommendation is partially based on new evidence, staff recommends that if the applicant desires additional time to respond, the City Council consider a continuance of the public hearing to its next meeting or the first meeting in August before voting and rendering a final decision on the appeal. If the applicant does not desire additional time to respond, then the Council should direct staff to prepare resolutions to memorialize its findings and decision for consideration at the July 21st Council meeting. For the Council's consideration, please note that staff has determined to change internal project review processes as a result of this experience so that these various topic areas are analyzed and considered as early in the development process as practical so that changes in recommendations such as is the case with this project will not happen in the future. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has provided a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) (The Natelson Dale Group, Inc.), which states that the proposed project would generate $113,814 in annual revenue to the general fund. Staff reviewed the applicant's FIA and compared it to tax data compiled for the other existing 7- Eleven locations within the City. According to Fiscal Year 2019-2020 data, existing 7-Eleven locations generate sales tax ranging between $10,000 to $40,000, annually, which is approximately$70,000 to$110,000 lower than the figures provided in the applicant's FIA. Further, it is also reasonable to assume that as the proposed project no longer includes alcohol sales, that sales tax generated by the project would be even lower than indicated in the FIA. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: For reasons discussed in this report, particularly as it relates to the project's potential to exacerbate an existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses, staff notes that the project will not achieve the City Council's Core Value to "promote and enhance a safe and healthy community." ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 —Applicant's Correspondence Dated May 19, 2021 Attachment 2 - May 12 and February 24 Planning Commission Item Packets Attachment 3— Census Tract 21.05 Vicinity Map Attachment 4 — Healthy Development Checklist Page 10 Page 619 From: Jonathan Shardlow To: City Council;City Clerk;McPherson,Sean Subject: Comments on City Council Agenda Item H1-Consideration Whether to Appeal the Action of the Planning Commission in Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164,Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138,and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. Date: Wednesday,May 19,2021 11:52:24 AM Attachments: RC Healthy Checklist Matrix.pdf 7-Eleven Lab Concept-Grocery-Restau rant.pdf 7-Eleven Presentation by 7-Eleven(Final).pptx IWARNINGLThe sender of this email could not be validated and may not match the person in the "From" field.11 o not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers and Planner Sean McPherson, Please accept these comments on tonight's item (Item No. H1). We do not believe an appeal is necessary given that the project was designed to be consistent with the Healthy Development Checklist as well as applicable Healthy RC standards. To be clear, the proposal is not a normal 7-Eleven, but one its new "lab" stores which includes a wide array of fresh and healthy options, which also includes a made-to-order Mexican restaurant with fresh and healthy offerings. Per the May 12, 2021 Planning Commission Staff Report, "the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced with [additional] fresh food areas." In this regard, in approving the Project, the Planning Commission found that "[t]he proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1)" Specifically, the facts supporting this finding, in part, state: "As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Attachmr@ of Of note, 7-Eleven is shedding its identity as a junk food staple. The chain wants to figure out how to change customers' perceptions that convenience food doesn't always have to be deep-fried or nutritionally sketchy. In early March 2019, the chain debuted its first "lab store," in Texas, a real-time testing ground for healthy conveniences. Outside, the store looks largely like any other 7- Eleven, with the familiar signage and gas pumps — inside, it looks a lot like a Whole Foods or any other sleek modern grocer, with natural wood accents and towers of trail mix ingredients sold in bulk. The 7-11 Lab Stores have been summarized as follows: Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical roller-grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten-free chili. Across the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you" refrigerator case, filled with grab-and-go lunch items: sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a "seasonal blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion-controlled packets of cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7- Eleven is stocked with enough gluten-free, paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness- obsessed snackers, with just enough "normal" food to resemble a small grocery store. (https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/182775 82/7- eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store) Notwithstanding our prior demonstration to healthy offerings, our office has taken the liberty to compare the project to the Healthy Development Checklist Page 621 and prepare notes on the project's consistency with the checklist and healthy vision. (attached). We have also attached a few snippets of offerings by 7- Eleven and Laredo Tacos from some the few Lab stores that exist today and have included many of the relevant slides provided to the Planning Commission which provide additional detail on the project. This will be one of the first 7-Eleven Lab Store in California. As I believe you will see from reviewing the attached items, you will conclude this project is anything but the normal 7-Eleven stores that exist throughout the City today. City Staff clearly communicated high standards for the project and 7-Eleven is ready to deliver on a truly state of-the art unique and modern offering for southwest Rancho Cucamonga. Thank you for your consideration. Jon From: Jonathan Shardlow Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:41 PM To: 'McPherson, Sean'; Grant Ross Subject: RE: Council Meeting Thank you Sean. Will the applicant team be given an opportunity to comment? We certainly wish to highlight the fresh and healthy offerings that would be offered by both the 7-Eleven and Laredo Taco. Jon From: McPherson, Sean [mai Ito:Sean.McPherson @cityofrc.us] Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 4:27 PM To: Jonathan Shardlow; Grant Ross Subject: Council Meeting Grant and Jon, Please follow the link below to access the City Council agenda for this coming Wednesday, May 19. The Council will be considering whether or not to appeal the Planning Commission's approval of your project. Reference Item H.1 on the agenda: https://ranchocucamonga.primegov.com/Portal/Meeting?compiled MeetingDocumentFileld=3458 Please let me know of any questions. Thanks, Sean McPherson,AICP Page 622 Senior Planner Planning Department City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 909-774-4307 1 https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store Jonathan Shardlow Shareholder Gresham Savage Nolan &Tilden, PC 550 East Hospitality Lane, Suite 300 San Bernardino, CA 92408 Office: (909) 890-4499 Ext. 1770 Fax: (909) 890-9877 www.GreshamSavaae.com ionathan.shardlow(a)greshamsavage.com 1. Privileged and Confidential Communication. The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential or subject to the attorney client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient of this communication, you may not use, disclose, print, copy or disseminate the same. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender and destroy all copies of this message. 2. Notice re Tax Advice. Any tax advice contained in this email, including any attachments, is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by you or any other recipient for the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties that may otherwise be imposed by the IRS, or (b) supporting, promoting, marketing, or recommending any transaction or matter to any third party. 3. Transmission of Viruses. Although this communication, and any attached documents or files, are believed to be free of any virus or other defect, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free, and the sender does not accept any responsibility for any loss or damage arising in any way from its use. 4. Security of Email. Electronic mail is sent over the public internet and may not be secure. Thus, we cannot guarantee the privacy or confidentiality of such information. Page 623 SUMMARY CHECKLIST Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ACTIVE DESIGN 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the project X support access to neighborhood amenities (e.g., convenience store,dry cleaning,community center, cafe,etc.)within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? The project offers a variety of amenities to its customers including the opportunity to buy fresh groceries,convenience items,to dine at the restaurant,and to purchase fuel within a short walking distance from nearby residences and businesses. The project also incorporates a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio for customers to 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the project X incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? The project offers a well landscaped environment with a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio,which is easily accessible by foot bicycle, or automobile. 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the project X contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? The project is designed with pedestrian safety in mind by the incorporation of pedestrian pathways and signage to alert drivers of pedestrians.It encourages pedestrian safety with a 56'setback from Archibald Avenue. These walkways serve as a safe point of entry with access to the 7-Eleven store and Laredo Taco Restaurant within 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or X contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? The project will connect Archibald Avenue with the existing sidewalk west of the site through the construction of a sidewalk along 9th Street.The 9th Street sidewalk will connect with the existing sidewalk and Archibald Avenue. The sidewalks lead to existing crosswalks for pedestrian access to and from the project. 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project X incorporate attractive,pedestrian-scale exteriors and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? The project provides a street setback of over 56 feet,which significantly exceeds the City's development standards. The project is well landscaped and includes sidewalks and pathways that are incorporated into the property which encourages walkability. The modern architecture of the building is an upgrade to nearby o.+lo 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project X incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? Throughout the site project,there is cohesiveness between all areas leading to the gas station,indoor restaurant,and the store. Page 624 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage public X open space,sidewalks,pedestrian amenities,bicycle facilities,and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? The project connects well to the existing pedestrian and bicycle network and incorporates a new sidewalk the will connect Archibald Avenue to properties west of the site. Vehicle entrances are placed to connect to the existing roadway network and separate vehicle traffic from pedestrian traffic. The design cohesively is planned to connect to the adjacent community and existing modes of transportation. There are more walkways for store entrance than there is for cars which makes the area safe for residents walking up to the store on Archibald and 9th street. 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance X walkabilify by providing a highly-connected street network? The project site offers several pathways out of the site that lead to existing crosswalks. There are more walkways for the store entrance than there is for cars which makes the area safe for rPtidentt wnikinn un to the store nn Arrhihnld and 9th street. 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project provide all X residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? There are three bus routes that are all approximately less than 1 mile in distance of Arrow Route.The closest bus route,Route 85,is .02 miles(3-4 minute walk)North of the property ran by Omni trans Rut thnt it nrrPvdhle to nedPttrinnt and rPtidentt_ 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the project X provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? Archibald Avenue has an existing Class 11 bike lane that safely provides access to the site and connects with other existing bike lanes throughout the community including existing bike lanes located north and south of the property. Additionally,it is safe and convenient to use the bike lanes to and from the Metro link Station. Bike ramps are also incorporated into the project design. Page 625 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply PUBLIC SAFETY 11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project foster X injury prevention through the use of traffic calming features,such as bulb outs and speed humps,safe pedestrian crossings,and moderate roadway speeds? The project uses landscaping and material variety to provide for safe pedestrian crossings and to ensure that there are no conflicts with traffic. The onsite circulation and building configuration naturally rnlmc tmffir and raduras vahirla cnaarL 12. . How well does the project X incorporate safe access to schools within a reasonable walking distance? Parents,students,and school administration from the nearby elementary school can access the site using the crosswalks and sidewalks that lead to and from the site and surrounding property.. 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide adequate X neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? Lighting is critical to the owner,tenant,and customers to increase safety and prevent crime. It is for this reason that a significant amount of time,effort,and photometric simulations are prepared to determine the proper lighting to provide a safe environment and nrniart irlantifirntinn Page 626 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 14. SMOKING. How well does the project incorporate efforts X to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? Signs will be clearly posted to prohibit smoking on the premises. Employees are also tasked with monitoring and addressing should it be necessarv.. 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project X incorporate efforts to protect residents from the harmful effects of high volume roads? The traffic analysis determined that limited traffic volume is generated from the project. Additionally,an industrial project or other permitted use would likely generate more traffic than the nmiprt_ 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project mitigate X noise pollution for all residents? The building is oriented to the west away from the residences across Archibald Avenue. Additionally,the project provides acoustical screening with its large setback and landscape buffer and significantly dissipates noise pollution to the residents easterly of the 616P 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the project X mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? The project provides for the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race,color,national origin,or income by providing the community with jobs,fresh food,dining, fuel,and convenience items to this area of the City. 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project X incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? The project will incorporate HVAC systems and state of the art air circulation to ensure good air quality and a healthy environment. Page 627 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply COMMUNITY COHESION 19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project incorporate X spaces that facilitate social engagement? The project provides several amenities to facilitate social engagement,including indoor and outdoor seating opportunities that are available for auests who wish socialize. 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the project X incorporate facilities and access to a variety of recreational opportunities for all users? The project includes sidewalks to encourage the neighbors and adiacent businesses to walk instead of drive. 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project X incorporate facilities and access to a multi-purpose community space accessible to the public? The project offers a variety of amenities to its customers including the opportunity to buy fresh groceries,convenience items,to dine at the restaurant and purchase fuel and a well landscape environment a 3,600 square foot outdoor patio. Customers can enjoy fresh brewed coffee,fresh fruit and explore the vast Laredo Taco menu. Page 628 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply ACCESS TO FOOD, JOBS, AND SERVICES 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate access to X a full-service grocery store (e.g.,sells meat,dairy,fruits and vegetables)within reasonable walking distance of all residents? The project provides fresh food and groceries including dairy, fruits, vegetables and high protein choices. Nearby residents and businesses can walk to the project in less than five minutes. 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the project X incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens,edible landscaping,or small-scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? While the project tenants source much of their fresh food offerings and ingredients from local and southern California locations, the project does not provide a community garden. Nevertheless, the project provides plenty of landscaping to enjoy fresh food purchases. 24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project designate X space or provide access to a farmer's market within a reasonable walking distance? The closest farmers market is located at 10788 Foothill Boulevard, which is approximately 2.1 miles from the residences that are closest to the project. While residents can easily access the farmers market by vehicle,bicycle,or bus, the proposed project offers a variety of fresh food that is less than a 5 minute walk from where they live and therefore more convenient and accessible by foot without the need for a vehicle or public transit. 25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project maintain a X balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? The project provides the community and businesses with fresh foods by using fresh ingratiates to a community that is currently underserved. Currently,there are only a few retailers that offer food. The food that is currently offered is fast food,pre-packaged food,snack food,and liquor from local ma and pop retail environment with little oversight and operational standards. 26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote shorter X commutes and better access to jobs? The project adds approximately 15 new jobs to the community. 27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project provide X future residents with access to health services? The project provides convenient access to a limited supply of over-the-counter medications and first aid products. 28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support increased X access to affordable and high-quality childcare? Not applicable. Page 629 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A all criteria some criteria comply 29. MIXED-USE. How well does the project integrate mixed- X use development? The project integrates several uses including fresh food and groceries,convenience items,gas service,and onsite dining. 30. MIXED HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to X a mix of housing options that will allow all potential household sizes,incomes,and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? Not applicable. Page 630 _ Lan " - a * :�. y l ryy 1J _ �a "Ol l ., x 1 "Make each customer's day better, make lives easier, simplier and more convenient" Page 632 Page 1 wm'O' koWhy Rancho? f r r - - s - • l 1�. 4 lk 1 Milk.Fik .'s lF�v'�T€nl� '• �'N r ; Page 633 L 0, Lab IRVING,Texas, March 27,2019 /PRhfewswire/-- Made-to-order smoothies and aqua frescos ...street tacos on handmade tortillas... a growler refill station pouring local craft beers... baked-in-store cookies and croissants... patio and inside dining areas ...The newest TEleven� location is a lab store and an experiential testing ground,where customers can try and buy the retailer's latest innovations in a revolutionary new store format. The newest 7-Eleven location in Dallas is a lab store and an experiential testing ground,where customers can try and buy the retailer's latest innovations in a revolutionary new stare format. Page 634 SLEvin LAB-Innovation Offerings 7-1 tt / Wrr� _dVWpf XPf .,. r ' f i W Page 4 wofILabAmenities Some of the other innovative ideas customers will see at the new 7-Eleven lab store include: • Made-to-order coffee drinks, cold-pressed juices, smoothies and aqua frescas that give customers the option to custamiZe their drinks in a full-service beverage format. Additionally, it carries novelty beverages on tap such as nitro cold brew, kombucha and organic teas. • "The Cellar," an alcove dedicated to an expanded selection of wines and craft beers, with a nearby growler station that features a rotating selection of local craft beer, cider and ales on tap. At the growler station, customers can enjoy a draft of their favorite beverage with their meal onsite or fill a growler to take home. • A cold treats bar with frozen yogurt, ice cream and multiple tappings • Cookies, croissants and more baked-in-store daily . Digital initiatives that enhance the shopping experience. Scan & Pay technology that allows customers to skip the checkout line and pay for their (non-age-restricted) purchases on their smartphones. * Indoor and patio restaurant-style seating in the Laredo Taco Company portion of the stare as well as bar-seating across the front windows in the retail space. Page 636 MAP SLEvin go ! Fresh Locally ingredientssourced Taco Lv Fresh & Healthy options organic �. I products fi r Taco concept "street taco style" • Homemade tortillas Fresh cracked eggs 1y. • Fresh salsa bar In restaurant dining and patio dining • Breakfast, lunch and dinner - Mobil order Outdoor pick up window i Corporate operated restaurant MADE HERE I ° Page 637 ILEvin DOWNLOAD THE APP Technology � � MEMOS Text"711ewards"to 711.711 tore At the Pumps 111 SoD two A P E LEVEn 0% G C t}�y r�F�� FCda R It1TERW.-IOHAL PKW,,Fr>w 1 X FYJ34 433 *_ ' Members aMys get rewordM � PpipflS =qpl l - i � . _ r•:t-�h�_� r���s;_ . . . ■ 1 } •F' ■ [ R Regular &4S' S2.39` Select pump L �� , mp L Save SHOP NOW , 1' T + jqa .tIrk � — lil tyfrlll t - - •,r •� � pw PUEL NOW a FA-40s IeM IWulshlesi=1oGalxllm Select Fuel Amount RI I > scan fty u man,flay 4A Skip the Line — TRBMM -- : ME II I �NRt� �l It CHANGE PAYMENT METHOD Page 638 1 090 ffis, EV Charging 70 FUELS - - 7-Eleven Adds More EV Charging � _ g in California ELEVEn Chain partners with ChargePoint and local utility to install fast-charging � stations Owl t By Samantha Oiler on Dec.02,2019 7-Eleven is constantly innovating for customers to provide them with the best experience at stores, said Ann Scott, senior director of energy, engineering and store planning for Irving, Texas-based 7-Eleven. "Our collaboration with SCE through Charge Ready is a win-win for everyone. Fast chargers mean � : •. added convenience for electric-vehicle drivers who visit our store o . , i and cleaner air for the surrounding community. We look forward to testing and learning during this pilot." ChargePoint Network Available Combo 188-375 mi/hr CHAdeMO 62.5-125 kW (DC Fast) Page 639 wm'O' koWhy Rancho? f r r - - s - • l 1�. 4 Page 640 M ILE�In rack Record ofSuccess as aResponsible Retailer 9ET GRAPELAND E1MS1 dna4Lnand ALTA MA 94s#ImvRd � t ■ w141, v Ch6tch Sx # fa16►ci151 r 1 i )s Ivd Rancho Cucamonga a J+ 1 7 } * Xrtflw�VSftq Lrff►►w iidlll� R NORTH 9rh tMhSI CUCAMONGA +, WHESTER w 2 Wit i Page 641 9 -r .... ` j� 1, 40 fk SNACY r 4 i:- ■ Page 11 $l or L_ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: May 12, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP, Senior Planner SUBJECT: LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS - A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020- 00138; and DRC2020-00087. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 subject to the conditions of approval included as an attachment to this report. Alternatively, if the Commission determines that findings for approval cannot be made, the Commission may direct staff to return with Resolutions denying the entitlements. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. On February 24, 2021, the Planning Commission denied a portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which requested off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has subsequently withdrawn their related request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00489. Based on comments at the February 24, 2021 public hearing, staff is now returning to the Commission as a General Business item to consider the remaining entitlements which the Commission did not take action on at the February 24 public hearing, specifically the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and the balance of the Conditional Use Permit relative to the operation of the service station and convenience store, which not excludes off-sale beer and wine sales. BACKGROUND: For a full history of the subject development application, reference the staff report and related attachments from the February 24, 2021 public hearing which have been included with this staff report as Exhibit 2. In addition to the portion of Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 which the Commission ultimately denied, Commissioners raised a number of questions relative to the balance of the development application at the February 24, 2021 public hearing. Specifically, the Planning Commission expressed the following concerns and questions: 1. Grocery and Fresh Food Options: Commissioners expressed a desire to see the proposed use expand fresh food options so that the proposed convenience store would effectively serve the same function as a small grocery store or market in order to benefit the local residents; Attachment 2 Page 653 2. Signage and Exterior Illumination: commissioners expressed concern that exterior illumination, including that from signage, would create a nuisance for residents across the street; 3. Equity: several commissioners noted the lack of quality grocery amenities within the Southwest area of the City, questioning whether the proposed service station with a convenience store and restaurant would be a benefit to the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood. 4. Concentration of Service Stations: commissioners also noted a perceived concern related to the number of service stations located within close proximity to the proposed project. After deliberating on this item, and ultimately denying the CUP request for off-sale alcohol sales, the commission continued the hearing and directed staff and the applicant to go back and consider changes to the project that might address these concerns. PROJECT ANALYSIS: Following the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the applicant revised the project in an effort to address the commission's stated concerns and questions and has amended the project to now include the following: 1. In order to improve services offered to local residents, the areas within the proposed convenience store which were previously dedicated to alcohol sales have now been replaced with fresh food areas; 2. To address concerns from the commission regarding exterior lighting and signage, lighting and signage shall be treated sensitively so as not to cause a nuisance to the residences across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all wall signage along the Archibald frontage shall be either externally illuminated or"halo" lit, so as to minimize any impacts and improve aesthetics. The tri-colored band feature surrounding the building will not be illuminated; 3. Beyond the abovementioned revisions to the project, and in response to the commission's concerns regarding this project being a high-quality project to the benefit of the Southwest Rancho Cucamonga neighborhood, the applicant has also revised the project to include: • Electric Vehicle charging stations—the applicant will install one Level 2 and one DC Fast Charger at the subject location. Both stations will have two ports each. The site plan has been revised to reflect the location of these chargers; • In the event that the service station will sell diesel gasoline, the applicant has agreed to replace regular diesel with Bio-Diesel gasoline; • The applicant has also agreed to design the building to LEED Silver standards and install appropriate drought tolerant landscaping. 4. Lastly, and in response to another concern that was raised at the public hearing related to the sale of tobacco, the applicant has agreed to not advertise any tobacco or tobacco related products along the Archibald Avenue frontage within view of the nearby elementary school. Further, the applicant has agreed that all tobacco and tobacco related products will be located behind the cashier's counter within the store, so as not to be easily accessible by minors. Regarding the perceived concentration of service stations, staff acknowledges that there are multiple service stations within close proximity to the subject location, however there is currently no "concentration ordinance" relative to the location of service stations. So, despite other service stations existing in the area, there is currently no prohibition on a service station locating at the subject site. 2 Page 654 Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations which can include convenience stores. Development Code Section 17.16.120.A identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings for the service station and convenience store, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, staff now feels that the project meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, staff feels that the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high -quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact: At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public 3 Page 653 health, safety, and welfare Moratorium on Service Stations: Staff notes that on April 21, 2021, the City Council approved an Urgency Ordinance enacting a 45-day moratorium on service stations throughout the City. The City Council will consider whether to extend this moratorium on June 2, 2021. This moratorium was enacted, in part, to allow staff and the City Council to study and analyze potential impacts relative to service stations, including the number and location of service stations within the City, their fiscal performance and whether or not additional regulations are necessary to ensure their compatibility with the City's goals and objectives. The subject development application was exempted from the moratorium provided that the developer obtains building permits within 6 months of the effective date of the moratorium, or by October 21, 2021. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: As now proposed, the project meets the Council's core value of "Intentionally embracing and anticipating the future," as well as "continuous improvement." Following the direction from the Commission at their February 24, 2021 meeting, the applicant has now revised the project to include a number of sustainable measures, including but not limited to the inclusion of electric vehicle chargers and ensuring that the building design will meet a minimum of LEED Silver standards. These sustainability measures intentionally embrace and anticipate the future as the City continues to seek more sustainable development. EXHIBITS: Exhibit A - Revised Project Description Exhibit B - Revised Site Plan and Floor Plan Exhibit C - February 24, 2021 Staff Report and Attachments Draft Resolution 21-29 Approving Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 Draft Resolution 21-30 Approving Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 Draft Resolution 21-31 Approving Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 4 Page 656 Revised Project Description Addressing Issues Raised by Planning Commission TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS Orbis Real Estate Partners proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant(Laredo Taco Company) A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. Orbis is eliminating its request to provide off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20—Off-Sale Beer and Wine License). All tobacco products will be located behind the cashier and only accessible by the cashier unless requested by a customer. The area previously reserved for alcohol sales floor area will be dedicated to general grocery items. The offerings of fresh food have been explained as follows: Unlike most other 7-Eleven stores, this outpost offers a range of hot and prepared food items that goes far beyond the typical roller-grill hot dogs that have been the chain's bread and butter for decades. Right next to the roller grill sit warmers full of soups like vegetarian tomato basil and gluten-free chili. Across the aisle awaits what press releases call the "better for you"refrigerator case, filled with grab- and-go lunch items: sandwiches, salads, and plastic bowls filled with a"seasonal blend" of mushy kiwi, grapes, cantaloupe, strawberries, and a single pineapple spear. Thanks to the current dominance of the keto trend, hard boiled eggs; portion-controlled packets of cured meats; cheeses; and cured meats wrapped around cheeses are abundant.... In the aisles, this 7-Eleven is stocked with enough gluten- free,paleo, vegan, organic, and naturally sweetened options to feed an entire army of wellness-obsessed snackers, with Exhibit A Page 655 just enough"normal" food to resemble a small grocery store.I Fresh food offering will be located throughout the store concentrated near the main entrance. The project proposes to design to LEED Silver certification, and if the City provides additional time for the project to pull a building permit (5 months or more in addition to the existing 6 month deadline),project will design and certify to LEED Silver standards. The proposed landscape plan already exceeds water conservation standards. At a minimum, the project will incorporate at least 2 electrical vehicle charging stations to supply, at a minimum, charging for a single vehicle at Level 2 standard and another single vehicle at"fast-charging" standards. The sale of diesel fuel, if any, will not accommodate heavy duty trucks and will not include high- flow diesel dispensers. Although the project originally was anticipated to balance without the need of soil import, additional soil import will be required to satisfy flood protection standards. A conservative amount of 5,000 cubic yards has been estimated. The Air Quality Evaluation for the project is being updated but the Applicant's air quality consultant has already determined such amount would result in a less than significant impact. Under any scenario, the project will not require more than 5,000 cubic yards. 'https://www.eater.com/2019/3/22/18277582/7-eleven-healthy-food-organic-slurpees-lab-store Page 656 { �~ VICINITY MAP i' EQH b.—EON EON— EG4 EOH EON �- - i NJ NJ roDTHILL BLVD. PROPOSED 9TH STREET RIGHT 40 MPH ——— ' INgG�Io ROUTE a s A s ESVTiY PROPOSED LOT PROPOSED 25'BUILDING (E) SIG ALZ ti E g. plod GG •t I LINE BIKE RACK ~ R SETBACK ♦ sEMAFti000 INTER ECTIO p 74 LIWi UME �'- g m ITE EL=0.0, S oxg$� 6 ST. E . . . . PROPOSED pp FIRE .•• . ... IIAIEHT MOR SIGN 8„ ..' . HYDRANT ."1O.'.• i•. .rn.'. � .n. sT. R — PATIO` PROJECT DATA caq� COMMERCIAL '' ♦ _ Bono ------ U ,� PROJECT INFORMATION: Z c7 PROPOSED 45 B ILDIN � w STORAGE + --- GREASES p ❑ SETB CK PPucaxi a ASS oclA Es,INC. Zb6 I INTERCEPTOR ATTH:MIKE HERMAN Z�. ly o) I 701 H.PARKCLNTER DR. Z 7 b / A SANTA ANA,CA 927D5 W O C Q II II I �L I f o TEL(714)560-8615 >Iy W H I I I MxERUAN.Tns'coM`3 J W W OESIIWIATED I ------ W w J x U I (RESTAURANT + .'.`•'•'.'.'.'.'.'.. I ARCHIIECi:GG aarTNIT�nMSwxu65.ING r. W H O PAF IIG I - - 7V H.PARKOENTER DR. Q ly U $] Rj I I•EI O o SANTA ANA,CA 92705 - I . .... . . FEMA FLOOD TILL:(n4)wo-as2a = LIMIT INE I CEL:(74)529-7992 1MRUS®TAD.COM I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 5: 0209-032-35-W W •�..'. ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBANN AVENUE Ib�3�I 4�"+" '"•••.• LLI SWC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST RANCHO COCAMONGA,CA 9173U PROJECT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STATGN-CONVENIENCE STORE GO C❑RSTRUCT❑N TYPE E%ISiING • '? I /^i raj /1 ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH. GENERAL wOUENIAL(G- o STORAGE F N Ip¢I�I L - 7'ELEVEN 10 LL 1 EA MEDSOULN IUM LRLAENAL M BUILDING .— STORE !f NEST: GENERAL wEUSTRlu(G-p �' 1...•.. ...'.'. IJ LA EKIS➢HG ZONING: C-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 8 SF . Q EKISR LAND USE: VACANT I I 1 HG I PROPOSES CONING: c-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL W L ••1••_••• "•`•'•'. W PROPOSED LAND USE: GRWNO-UP GAS STATOR-CONVENIENCE STORE IbK+I I— BUILDING INFORMATION: I= RESIDENTIAL NET ACREAGE'. S7314 AT1.Da ACRES PROP SED PROPOSED BUIWING PREA: 6,60D SF(+3,60D SF PA➢O AREA) '•'�'.'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'.' ELEC ICAL I U PROPOSED RESTAURANT AREA: 32005 IF fill PROPOSED CONVENIENCE AREA: 54595 IF I I - METE �/ PROPOSED CANOPY AREA: ateo 3 (p I I Imo$}+I CAB NfET ILL WINCING xDWL ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEICAIT 75 FT ] Q LOT COVERAGE: FIN(9,780 SF) g 2 DESIGNATEp - PROF(SED LANDSCAPING LOT COVERAW: m.ex za5as s et s:` ¢! I _ •♦ rFIRE SPRINKLERS REWIRED YES RFSTAlR7AMT TRAN FOR REWIRED BUlwxc sETeacKs ]� { PAPo(ING T j•••,•' 0 FROM ARONSALD AVE 45 FT yqg p ! STALLS FROM 9TH STREET 25 FT • v I I I {]} ••1 .5' 8' I I SIDE 5 FT s ♦'♦, REAR 0 FT } REWIRED CANOPY SETBACKS AVE 45 FT '. ! V5 PRCI°OSFD EVCS •PRDPOEEOT. ,• FROM 9TH STREET 25 FT F PHASE O'D V%R� + REWIRED LANDSCAPING SETBACKS �_ P CK SWITCH GEAR .TR,1NffCf61ER 455' ILM FRONT 45 FT •• I SIDE(INTERIORN 25 FT { 1 1 -'.'.7SL•','.`.` SIDE(STREET) 5FT V N ' ,� ! `1 5 •♦r T S E)Q G AIRo REAR 0 FT HYOR T PARKINGREQUIREMENTS: N WNVENISNCL PARKING REQUIRED: 14 3 STALLS PER 1000 SF •' CONVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED: 14 STALLS POPS MDITONAL 14 STALLS AT FUEL r DPD�r ♦ RESTAURANT PARKING REWIRED: 20 RESTAURANT USE:10 PER 1000 SF T RESTAURANT PARKING PROVUED: 22 STALLS A ' `r! AJ DESIGNATED TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED'. 34 STALLS(INI 2 ACCESSIBLE A,BIKE RACKS a ANG 4 1 TOTAL PARKING PROMOED: 36 STALLS RNCL 2 ACCESSBLE 2 EV k BIKE RACKS ' U) JW a U UTILITY INFORMATION: PROPOSED .9•, DESIGNATEDF71 P+ _ PROPOSED o { ELtcmlcAL SOUTHERN CAUFORHu EDIwN HEALY TANK 1� CDNSEH[WGE (4) SHARE GAS: SOUTHERN CAUFORHu GAS COMPANY 6 Yn6gy FULL I WATER: COCAM❑NGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT S C ,RIy G �' I�rIT MGyEMEIT O STORM DRAIN: CITY OF RAN(110 WCAMWGA rrWM„ �$8g 99 5T 9 4 L� SANITARY SEWER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ■ R VIEW REFUSE I BURRTEC D17MAL SITE LEGEND lit �+� • o�n I ���������� PROPERTY LINE ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING a - --- --- I -----PATH OF TRAVEL SPACE �• BUILDING SETBACK .�.-. $ E UTILITY POLE EXISTING TI 0_ I ---------- LANDSCAPE SETBACK IT (E)ARE HYDRANT T } n DRIVEWAY TO I �II — 15'W DRAINAGE& BE REMOVED ';i f I / --------- DEMO BUILDING Q (E)STREET L1CMT UTWITY EASEMENT 25'LI Y DRAINAGE& \\ - II UTILITY ERSEIIEHT t �' UU�, ��00'' ".�3'''CONCRETE PAYNG/SIDEWPlI( B LE: P■. �. \ � �STANDARD A.C.PAYING Y SHEET: -ExH b it , , 91• ! SCALE:1"=P0' LVCSCWE AREA Page 640 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 1 K9BLC3RRAMPAYM CSP-11 PRINTED BY: SPRESTON DRAWING NAME: SE12410 - A2.0 DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN - 3.DWG PRINT DATE: Apr 23, 2021 - 6:55pm ❑ ❑ 00 . as QQ . as o0 oa Qo . oa ff44 /4" 35 3/4" 7'-8 3/4" 12'-10" 4'-0 1/4" 11 3'-11 1/2" 3'-0 1/4" 23'-9 1/4" �� 4'_2" O � ❑ � w D 7O ® o ® O 041 0 W i 6 Ef E:I Ef 7SINK �N -n Ef0 1 1 1 1 i= � O -1 L O x 0 A A_ 1 14 v 0 Ef Ll Ef 1 10 d--� j Z 0 o p C 0 11-1 171 M Ef I � I --I � '�l 0 3'-111/2" i i -n IT- M ❑ o 3A09tl 00 H�O Nn 00 N rn o v 0 N 9'-3 °i" w a; w ® CI0 f f Inco CER �E ❑ o TWIN POUR ai a $y y a (� 12'-11" n� wzl9 �� mf mE 0 Z L. . �p °A L. -3" 0 to ,0 J� O co 6'-2„ M F - m - Cq Cl) 5'-3 /4" C � z Q — lid] I N M /55 Ui a ❑ ® m m 0 0 o a o o T 7 —, � R our A o 00 ❑o ❑o N � D o❑ o a o 0 6 _10 n °� N - o lul Is Is1 Rnsx _ z 5 ICE C* m N_ CO W N N N V 71 4�t 31 0 o 0 w o D _ o N N z 4-1 N m 0 0 O Fo- 4'4" - 4'-9" 6'-1 1/2" � 6'-0 1/ -5 1/2" > to � 0 � / o D 0 o r v, Iv rn � O G, rn Cn m 0 0 0 OD g � � = y 0 CR co o O rJ ,' N -n 1 ' Vf V /U 6, O M O N n m0 T D _ ;00 14'-10" /V m 0 � co Cop D r 0 o -n C N D - m m W n C r" m z W D rn n 17'-5 1/4" 42'-10 3/4" I I > '-6 3/4 60' 4" m o nm0 T mp0T 2CnG nDX -n z > 0 D 0 > > mzm z C� � C) W CnO � DD � � n 0 nn Z > --i m Cn � m T z 0 DZ zz0� � Dp M o z0 rn � m -UNm Omm � D � 0 C/) Z r mm DUD 0 00 C > r 00 C C/) 0 � 0 ymn ♦rnA x n�_ oom V+ Xz Cmr C --i z M zD mmG) V/ 0r � zr r -n n 0 O mn r-� m0 M0 0 Cn 701 N.Parkcenter Drive Rev. # Date Description 2 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS Job#: S E 1241 7-ELEVEN, INC. m Santa Ana,CA 92705 f OF THE SERNCE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF 3 01/23/20 REVISED SITE PLAN m 3200 HACKBERRY RD., IRVING TEXAS 75063 THE ARCHITECT AND/OR 1-ELEVEN,INC.WHETHER THE Scale: 3/16" = 1'-Orr p:714/560/8200 4 03/17/20 REVISED SITE PLAN — CLIENT PROJECT FOR WHICH THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR N TA I T www.tait.com 71 .tait.com om 7—ELEVEN #41330 NOT.THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL NOT BE 5 04/02/20 REVISED SITE PLAN - 7-ELEVEN USED BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY ON OTHER PROJECTS, Issued: 12/10/2020 ARCHIBALD AVE & 9TH ST 6 05/27/20 REVISED SITE PLAN - 7-ELEVEN FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT,OR COMPLETION OF THIS Since 1964 Los Angeles Boise Anaheim Dallas ELEVEn RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PROJECT WHEN PHASED,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT Drawn By: SP Ontario Denver ® 7 06/30/20 CLIENT REVISIONS OF THE ARCHITECT AND/OR 1-ELEVEN,INC. Sacramento Seattle 8 08/28/20 CITY REVISIONS Copyright 2020 Checked By: LR © "TAIT&ASSOCIATES"2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FLOOR PLAN b�� 9 10/07/20 CLIENT REVISIONS rn�� 0 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DATE: February 24, 2021 TO: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director INITIATED BY: Sean McPherson, AICP SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164; MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087; AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2020-00459 (LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE) - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS — A new commercial building with a service station and convenience store proposing off-site alcohol sales (Type 20) located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209- 032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission deny Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164; Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138; Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and recommend that the City Council deny the request for Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459, and direct staff to return to the Planning Commission with Resolutions as appropriate. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes the development of a 14-pump service station and convenience store with a restaurant. While the project meets all relevant development standards for site design and architecture, the convenience store proposes off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20)across the street from an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and within a census tract (Census Tract 21.05)which has been found to be among the most overconcentrated census tracts for off-sale alcohol licenses within the City. Over the course of two neighborhood meetings, neighbors have expressed concerns which are substantiated by facts related to the proximity of the project to the school and overconcentration within the census tract. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of the project. BACKGROUND: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District and has a General Plan Land Use designation of General Industrial (GI). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping). This existing building is proposed to remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9th Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. Exhibit C Page 659 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 2 The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District PROJECT ANALYSIS: A. Protect Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story commercial building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) with off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20 — Off-Sale Beer and Wine License) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco Company)which proposes on-sale beer and wine sales (Type 41 — On-sale Beer and Wine—Eating Places License). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The driveway entrance and parking lot of the existing multi-tenant commercial building at the southern portion of the property is proposed to be reconfigured because of this project. The applicant has provided a Project Description (Exhibit C) describing the proposed 7-Eleven convenience store portion of the project as a "new lab store concept." According to the applicant, this concept differs from a conventional convenience store by providing the following amenities: made-to-order specialty drinks, self-serve specialty coffee, cold treats bar (yogurt, ice cream, etc.), and a "Cellar," which houses a variety of beers and wines for sale. In addition,the applicant describes the Laredo Taco Company restaurant as serving fresh Mexican food made-to-order. The 7-Eleven and service station component of the project proposes to operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, whereas Laredo Taco Company proposes to operate 5:00 AM to 10:OOPM every day. The proposed project is consistent with all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard approx. Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet (1-foot increment from the feet (fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling cano Page 2 of 9 Page 660 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 3 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback (9th Min. 25 feet feet (proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet (fueling cano Street Side Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (9th Average Depth of 25 feet (9th Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet (9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet cano 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landscaping: Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls. This results in an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Provided Parking Parkin Convenience 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 Store at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project also complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9th Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Page 3 of 9 Page 663 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 4 Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164: The project includes a proposal to subdivide the existing subject parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along 9t" Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0.65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Upon reviewing the application, staff identified certain concerns with the proposed development, particularly related to the request for the PCN and the related CUP. Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2020-00459: The project requires a Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) pursuant to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) regulations and state law to allow an off-sale alcohol license (Type 20) related to the proposed convenience store within a census tract where alcohol licenses exceed concentration limits established by state law. The applicant has provided a Letter of Justification supporting their request for a PCN, which is included with this report as Exhibit D. Regarding the request for PCN, Census Tract 21.05, within which the project is located, is overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses. ABC permits 3 off-sale alcohol licenses within Census Tract 21.05; the proposed convenience store would constitute the ninth off-sale alcohol license within the census tract. Staff notes that according to a conversation with ABC staff, there are currently 7 active licenses and 1 pending license, in addition to 7-Eleven's request. Pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4, an "undue concentration" of off-sale retail license applications exists under either of the following two scenarios: (1) "The applicant premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes . . . than the average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts within the jurisdiction of the local law enforcement agency;" or (2) "the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the applicant premises are located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located." According to ABC personnel, Census Tract 21.05 is already significantly overconcentrated with off-sale alcohol licenses under the second standard. This means an undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within the census tract. According to ABC's online database, there are 23 census tracts within Rancho Cucamonga where at least one off-sale alcohol license has been issued, and only one other census tract has 9 off-sale alcohol licenses (Census Tract 20.36 — Terra Vista). Therefore, if approved, the requested PCN would make the subject Census Tract 21.05 equal to the most overconcentrated census tract in the City. Exhibit E included with this staff report graphically illustrates the boundary of Census Tract 21.05, highlighting the location of these uses. An undue concentration of off-sale licenses exists within this census tract by three times the state's standard, and staff acknowledges that these facts correspond to the concerns raised by neighbors over the course of two neighborhood meetings held for the project. Another concern relative to off-sale alcohol sales is the project's proximity to an elementary school (Cucamonga Elementary School) and potential for this to result in an increase in alcohol and tobacco sales to minors. While Cucamonga Elementary School is located immediately to the northeast of the project site across the Archibald Avenue and 9t" Street intersection, staff also notes that the project site is within close proximity to Rancho Cucamonga Middle School, approximately 1,800 feet to the east. Staff notes that the Sherriff's Department recently conducted an operation at 22 off-sale establishments Citywide in which 4 locations, all within close proximity to schools (2 elementary, 1 private, and 1 high school), were caught selling alcohol and tobacco to underage minors. While these incidences were not directly related to the proposed 7-Eleven, this information supports concerns raised by neighbors during two neighborhood Page 4 of 9 Page 664 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 5 meetings held for the project and illustrates a sensitivity to locating such uses near schools Finding: The Development Code provides no findings for PCNs. Rather, ABC regulates the distribution of alcohol licenses by setting limits on the various types of licenses in each census tract pursuant to Sections 23958 and 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code. As described above, the limits are calculated based on the ratio of alcohol licenses to the population within a specific census tract. In cases where a census tract exceeds the allowable limit of certain alcohol licenses (i.e., creates an "undue concentration"), findings in support of a PCN are required to be made by the local governing body. For Rancho Cucamonga, the local governing body is the City Council. The Business and Professions Code does not define the phrase "public convenience or necessity." According to the courts, this means that "the discretion to make that decision includes the discretion to determine the relevant factors on a case-by-case basis." (Nick v. City of Lake Forest, 232 Cal.AppAth 871 (2014)). Decision makers are afforded considerable discretion in making this determination. Fact: Issuing the ABC license to the applicant does not serve the public convenience or necessity because: 1)there is already a significant undue concentration of off-sale alcohol licenses in the subject census tract; 2), the license site is near a school, which data provided by the Sherriff's Department suggests could result in an increase in the number of minors obtaining alcohol; and 3) both of these reasons were expressed by multiple neighbors as part of two public neighborhood meetings. Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00787: The project includes a proposal to operate a 14-pump service station which includes a convenience store with off-sale beer and wine sales. Table 17.30.030-1 of the Development Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for service stations, convenience stores, and alcoholic beverage sales. Further, Section 17.32.020 of the Development Code defines that convenience stores "may be part of a service station or an independent facility." The code also describes alcoholic beverage sales as "the retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off-site consumption subject to regulation by...ABC...as an off-sale establishment." Therefore, one CUP is required to allow the convenience store with service station that functions as an "off-sale establishment."As such, by permitting the requested off-sale alcohol sales, approval of the CUP would exacerbate the overconcentration within the census tract as it is related to the request for a PCN. The Development Code (RCMC Section 17.16.120.A) identifies that a Conditional Use Permit provides a process for a determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings need to be evaluated in terms of a specific development proposal for a specific site. Uses qualifying for a Conditional Use Permit are considered minor in nature, only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties, and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. Within the General Industrial (GI) District, service stations with convenience stores with off-sale alcohol sales are a permitted land use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The findings of facts below, specifically Findings #1 and #3, do not support the necessary Conditional Use Permit findings, which are required by the City's Development Code: Finding: The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.1). Fact: General Plan Goal LU-1, requires that the City "Ensure established residential neighborhoods are preserved and protected, and local and community-serving commercial and community facilities meet the needs of the residents." Policy LU-1.1 further requires that the City "Protect neighborhoods from the Page 5 of 9 Page 663 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 6 encroachment of incompatible activities or land uses that may have a negative impact on the residential living environment."Similarly, Land Use Goal LU-6 requires that the City"Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy: LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall "Continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." The project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol within an overconcentrated census tract. If permitted,the census tract would contain three times the number of off-sale alcohol licenses that constitute undue concentration under state law. This would be the highest number of licenses within a census tract within the City. This concern of overconcentration has been clearly expressed by neighborhood residents over the course of two neighborhood meetings. Further, while the proposed restaurant component increases the availability of food establishments, the immediate vicinity is already well served, or planned to be well served by service stations and convenience stores, in addition to the noted overconcentration of alcohol off-sales. Therefore, approving such a use is not consistent with the stated goals and policies of General Plan Land Use Goals LU-1 and LU-6. Finding: The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards (Development Code 17.16.120.D.2). Fact: The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. Finding: Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located (Development Code 17.16.120.D.3). Fact:As noted above, the project proposes a convenience store which includes off-sale alcohol sales within an overconcentrated census tract. The project site is also located across the street from an elementary school. Data from the Sherriff's Department suggests that there is a correlation between the proximity of convenience stores and schools which may increase the potential for alcohol and tobacco sales to minors, as evidenced at other locations throughout the City of similar uses within close proximity to schools. Therefore, the proposed use may be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. B. Neighborhood Meetings and Neighborhood Concerns: As part of the development review process, the applicant and developer held a Neighborhood Meeting on November 10, 2020, to solicit comments from the surrounding property owners. About 6-7 participants attended virtually. All participants at this meeting expressed opposition to the project, and generally raised the following concerns: perception of high number of service stations and liquor/convenience stores within the area; proximity of the project to Cucamonga Elementary School; concern over hours of operation; and concerns regarding traffic, noise and glare. As a result of the type of concerns raised by residents at this meeting, staff initiated a second Neighborhood Meeting which was held on January 11, 2021. To ensure maximum neighborhood participation for this second meeting, City staff expanded the radius for mailed notices to include over 300 mailers printed in both English and Spanish. A Spanish interpreter was also present at the second meeting. Approximately 12 residents attended this second Neighborhood Meeting and many of the same concerns were raised, with one resident expressing support for the project. As this report has already covered concerns related to the overconcentration of off-sale alcohol, which was a prominent concern raised by the neighbors, staff responds to the remaining neighbor concerns as follows: Page 6 of 9 Page 666 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 7 1. Perceived Concentration of Service Stations: Regarding service stations, there is no "concentration ordinance" in the Development Code which regulates the number of service stations within the City. However, staff acknowledges the neighbor's comments that there are multiple service stations within the vicinity of the subject project. While there is only one service station currently within Census Tract 21.05 (Valero Station, 8514 Vineyard) slightly over a mile from the proposed project, 3 other service stations exist within 1 mile of the project site (76 Station at 10075 Arrow Route, Kwik Sery at 9524 Foothill Boulevard, and Shell Gas at 7996 Archibald Avenue). Staff notes that another service station about '/4 of a mile to the north of the project site was approved as part of DRC2015-00682 in July 2018 to rehabilitate an existing abandoned service station at the northeast corner of Arrow Route and Archibald Avenue. It is not known at this time when that service station rehabilitation project may begin construction. Exhibit E also provides the location of service stations within the project vicinity. Staff notes for the Commission's information that Each of these service stations include off-sale alcohol. 2. Hours of Operation: multiple residents raised concerns regarding potential impacts associated with the proposed hours of operation, including an increase in crime and noise. Staff notes that the proposed convenience store and service station will operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with the Laredo Taco Company proposing hours of 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM, 7 days a week. 3. Traffic, Noise and Glare: Residents expressed concern over potential for increased traffic related to the service station. Staff notes that the project applicant has provided a Traffic Impact Analysis(Urban Crossroads, February 2021), which demonstrates that no significant traffic impacts will occur as a result of this project. To off-set any potential traffic deficiencies, certain traffic improvements to the Archibald and 9th Street, intersection will be required. These improvements generally include modifying existing lanes to accommodate a shared left-through lane and dedicated right turn lane in conjunction with a modification to the traffic signal to accommodate right-turn overlap phasing. Similar improvements at the City's request, and at the applicant's cost, have been identified for the Archibald Avenue and Arrow Route intersection, as well. Regarding Noise, the applicant also provided an Acoustical Study (Urban Crossroads, September 2020) which demonstrates that the project will not result in any significant increase in either construction or operational noise. Lastly, the applicant has provided staff with a preliminary Lighting Plan which demonstrates that the project will meet all required lighting standards, thus limiting the potential for adverse impacts on adjacent properties. E. Design Review Committee: The project was reviewed by the Design Review Committee (Oaxaca, Williams, and Smith) on January 19, 2021. Staff presented the project to members of the Design Review Committee and raised one design issues related to whether or not two tri-colored metal band features proposed to wrap around the building and fueling canopy should be illuminated. The committee recommended that that tri-colored band should be illuminated, provided that this element comply with all relevant lighting and glare standards. The project was forwarded to the Planning Commission with the above design recommendations. For reference on the full discussion related to design and architecture, Exhibits F and G included with this report provide the DRC Comments and Minutes, as well as 3D renderings of the project. F. Fiscal impact Analysis: The Fiscal Impact Analysis(The Natelson Dale Group, Inc.) prepared for the project estimates that the project would provide an annual net fiscal benefit of approximately $114,000 to the City upon completion of the project. This figure has not been peer reviewed or confirmed. Generally, new recurring general fund revenues include property taxes, property tax in-lieu, residential derived sales taxes, commercial derived sales taxes, business license fees, and franchise fees. The project proponent will also Page 7 of 9 Page 665 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 8 be responsible for paying one-time impact fees. These fees are intended to address the increased demand for City services due to the proposed project. The following types of services that these impact fees would support include the following: library services, transportation infrastructure, drainage infrastructure, animal services, police, parks, and community and recreation services. G. Options for the Planning Commission to Consider: While the Planning Commission considers staff's recommendation to deny the application, the Commission may consider the following options: 1. Uphold staff's recommendation to deny application and recommend denial of the PCN to City Council; 2. Reject staff's recommendation and approve the application, and recommend that the City Council approve the PCN; 3. Consider approving (or in the case of the PCN, recommending approval of,) certain entitlements relative to the project application while denying other entitlements. For example, approving the Tentative Parcel Map, Minor Design Review and CUP, but recommending denial of the PCN, so that the project may be constructed without authorization of off-site sales; 4. Explain to the applicant which aspects of the project the commission finds favorable, direct the applicant to revise the project, and set a continued hearing to a future date. CEQA DETERMINATION: The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). Staff notes that, if the project is denied, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15270(a), CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency disapproves. CORRESPONDENCE: This item was advertised as a public hearing with a regular legal advertisement in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin newspaper on February 10, 2021, the property was posted on February 10, 2021, and notices were mailed to all property owners within a 660-foot radius, as well as those property owners who received a notice for the second neighborhood meeting (416 property owners) on February 9, 2021. To date, no comments have been received in response to the project notifications. Any correspondence received prior to the public hearing will be provided to the Commission under separate cover. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: For reasons discussed in this report, particularly as it relates to the project's potential to exacerbate an existing overconcentration of off-sale alcohol licenses, staff notes that the project will not achieve the City Council's Core Value to "promote and enhance a safe and healthy community." EXHIBITS: Exhibit A: Vicinity Map and Aerial Photograph Page 8 of 9 Page 666 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MDR DRC2020-00138 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS February 24, 2021 Page 9 Exhibit B: Project Plans Exhibit C: Applicant's Project Description Exhibit D: Applicant's Letter of Justification for PCN Exhibit E: Census Tract 21.05 Vicinity Map Exhibit F: January 19 DRC Comment Letter and Action Minutes Exhibit G: 3D Renderings Page 9 of 9 Page 660 �k•: I t f Map/AerialPhotograph - - _ S R Subject site: a r . , .. •. • t r' % "'.44 T �� 1 t'c Oin 010 l Exhlibit A - � . 1 � f y VICINITY MAP —EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH EOH c EOH—ES)—EOH—EOH—EOH E H CEO EOH—EOH—SUN =§ Y 8 8 FOOTHILL BLVD 25 . - 66 PROPOSED 9TH STREET - ---— ——— RIGHT 40MPH ——— b --- - _ �dQ{,���{gy� ARRO RBUTE m N —_—_ — E4VAY —`— --------�/ _ T>y o E TH Sr °o _ PROPOSED LOT PROPOSED Sl e e sT. - LINE BIKE RACK SETBACK LNG ♦ FEMA FLOOD(N)TERS CT MIT LINE ITE " E PROPOSED FIRE • ' MONUMENT SIGN rc ro.'.'.'." . . HYDRANT '.rn.'.'.'.' i '.'�.•,.... . . W .-r 22 57 2 ° 1 n/ L PATIO f PROJECT DATA oN� a COMMERCIAL ♦ s6Xs0 U� Mxa a r PROPOSED 45'B ILDING PROJECT INFORMATION: Z C7 �o w STORAGE . ____, GREASE ' ..q E6 SETBACK APPDCANi: TAT§ASSOCIATES,INC. �� INTERCEPTOR °o.p 701 N.PAR CENTER DR. W15 Z>O • ATTN:MIKE HERMAN W N pEdll <.e�". ° SANTA ANA,CA 92705 O a2 a 0 TEL:(714)560-8615DEL p W a 7 p MHERMA1NWAIT.COM3 J it W m7 W DESIGNATED f • jy w J=0 t1 RESTAURANT ARCHITECT. TNT§ASSOCIATED INC. m ATTN ON VIRUS p,(UO Z p O,IN PARKING ^I' 701 N.PARKCENTER DR. U RD ®E I STALLS I w SANTA NA,CA 92705 O FEMA FLOOD ° TEL 71e sm-E624 x a 3 I' OD Of < I I LIMIT ENE � cee p1a)529 799z I TAmisoraTWM it It + L I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER (G ) 0209-032-35-000O I p 1 l I N3 I uJ AD— ME ARCHIBALI AVENUE .:•:♦:••.:•:LL.• 5'MC ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9TH ST RANCHO OJCAMONGA,CA 917M PR0.CCT DESCRIPTION: GROUND-UP GAS STATION-CONVENIENCE S1OP 28. ' 20' 30' 0 I Q O1 CONSTRUCTION Tree EXISTING - 6D.5' 56 2 n=n O ADJACENT ZONING: NORTH: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(G-Q LL SOUTH: GENERALINDUSTrAL IN) STORAGE . N j Ip Opjdil I 7-ELEVEN I Q EAST: GENERA INDUENTIAL(G) 0 BUILDING �. STORE xEST GENERAL INDUSTRIAL c-I pp 110x66 I'-'� ENsnxc zoxEuc c-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIA N ICI i• 6 600 SIF Q ENSnNG VIND USE: VACANT M PROPOSED ZUNING: G-I-GENERAL INDUSTRIAL W 4 N y PROPUSED LAID USE GROUND-UP GAS STAA0N- ON fl 1 N STONE Ipogel qq I— BUILDING INFORMATION: a7 E9.' NET ACREAGE: E73.314 SF I.fiB ACRES I. PROPSED = RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED BUIWING AREA E6W SF(i3,6005F PATO AREA) ➢q, I ELEC RICAL I PROPOSED RESTAURANT AREA: }zoos SF %8os U PROPOSED CONVENIENCE AREA E4,595 SF u r E METE N ° PROPOSED CANOPY AREA 3.I80 BF Ip048I 0> I. CABIl ET ILL BUILDING HEIGHT: ALLOWABLE BUILDING NEGRI 75 R Ng" iE e 0' Q Loi COYERACE: 13.3%(9.780 SF) LANDSCAPING LOT COVERAGE: 318R 23.306 Sf s F=o i/ DESIGNATED PROP)SED ORE SPRINKLERS REQUIRE: AS �i ° RESTAURANT 3, " TRAN FORM 1 PARKING _ REOUIRED BUILDING SETBACKS II maM ARaEBALo A STALLS T I ° w Ipoj�I ' FROM 91 STREET 25 FT F u (7) N • I SLUE 5 ET p . •� REAR OFT S D f -- 0... 8 ••125 5• ••'�'•'". 1 6` REQUIRED CANOPY SETBACKS 1 FROM ARCHBALD AVE 45 FT F \�\ >� FROM 91H STREET 25 R YI _' '• .•.�• •,'� 45'B ILDIN I REQUIRED LAN9scMNS SETRACKS n •.•• SETS CK I PIDETENTEkaR OFF •• .•.7S ".'."• SIDE(51REEQ 5R O N N m 1 N O F O REAR 0 FT O \\ O1 5 ' ' .ST'AC N.G.LLISIA E EXIST G FI I PARKING REQUIREMENTS W ®, ,. .• HYDR NT CONVENIENCE PARKING REQUIRED: 14 IS STALLS PER 1000 SF) N a CONVENIENCE PARKING PROVIDED: 14—(PLUS ADDITIONAL 14 STALLS AT FUEL m T W y PROPOSED I RESTAURANT PARKING REWIRED: 20(RESTAURANT USE:10 PER IWO 47 ' m RESTAURANT PARKING PROVIDED: 22 S— c �c • 1 i ATER_ DESIGNATED I TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED: 34 STAlls UNCL.2 ACCESSIBLE @ BIKE RACKS) 0 j L ONVENIENCE i4 PR D TRMH M TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 36 S1ALL5(INCL 2 ACCESSIBLE 2 EV 8 BIKE RACKS) ' y y W V PR POS UTILITY INFORMATION: PROPOSED 9' DESIGNATED EN --PARKING ° UTILI Eac muwERx CALIFORNIA EDESW e = HEALY TANK '� CONVENIENCE �♦ S ARE rr GAS: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY • • ST E (5) ULL L WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRCT ■:. ARK(G O E,p7C'X� MO EME T o STORM DRINK CITY of RAnaoLcucABBWcn STA LS 9 „ SANITARY SEWER. V r wATE 0-1 0-GA ALE @� � �a w R 'EW k REFusE cauEcnW: WRRTEc olsvosu j ffie 5) Al I SITE LEGEND �o® s PROPERTY LINE ® ACCESSIBLE PARKING g - - - = o I -•------•----- PATH OF TRAVEL SPACE EXISTING BUILDING SETBACK $ (E)UTILITY POLE I ( DRIVEWAY TO LANDSCAPE SETBACK (E)FIRE HYDRANT 15'W DRAINAGE& AINAGE BE REMOVED - - DEMO BUILDING 4 (E)STREET LIGHT UTILITY EASEMENT ZUTI WTDREASEMEN& -------- E O CONCRETE PAMNC/SIDEWALK \ I m (SCALE:1 � O STANDARD A.C.PAVING \ \ I LANDSCAPE AREA Page 669 SHEET CSP-9 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN z,SCAL=rE:-o^ 1 ®DECORARME PAVING PRINTED BY: SPRESTON DRAWING NAME: SE12410 - A2.0 DIMENSIONED FLOOR PLAN - 2.DWG PRINT DATE: Oct 08, 2020 - 12:05pm F El FEI] �o oa �o . ao 0o as �o oa W N 3'-4" 4 1/4" 35 3/4" 7'-8 3/4" 12'-10" 4'-0 1/4" 3'-11 1/2" 3'-0 1/4" 23'-9 1/4" 11 4'-2" O 00 0 ® OHE w W El Ell 0 IT7 ILIN) (A W El F1 lhl 0 o � SINtK v O El p 0 � Z � �, z c� 0 , << o Ello C Or 0o r rn El V_1 1 4' 10" El 701 3'-11 1/2" -n 2' o" rol m �o0 00 N 0 0 N a aaiae � ] 9'-3" � o CD ® m FET4CER `� `� `aL 12' TWIN POUR c" ] /� C M 2 ��Ie 9 rrrtrt� m� i,a m F O Z o OA OA - O 3„ � 0 6'-2" N ° ME /4" rn O Z O LfE cn IS iS1 Cl) A oa oa oa ® N L ] m V7 O �❑ �❑ rn D - - sH o o ❑o ❑o N ❑ o 5'-0" o0 00 0 ICE 0- 10'-0" g� _ m� O �w N N = zt " O W N N N V A Vt v A o � m 1 \ 12 _ CD = 0 D N Z 4'-1" - N ® go o N IM / 0 ® 3'-7" °D 4'-4" 4'-9" 6'-1 1/2" 6'-0 1/ " _ -5 1/2" y \ 0 o o m / O cn m N 01 \ CD < 4,-4„ D 4'-5" / � y O O 02 co o a O N V Vf V IM N O rn CD n w �A D CAI n m 14'-10" m O N) Z `o < O � p � I" m oA oc � r m CCD M N D � � n Z m J ] W D O� n 17'-5 1/4" 42'-10 3/4" II � '-6 3/4- 60'-4" m o O � m0 rnm 0 ❑^' j zm --j ;V D 71 n D O r z z cn m D D < W � � nm0 M mppm r O71 2 Cn < n -n U) 0 � > z > 0 z m0DD D Oo O xM z rn0 � 0C/, DD � � r mD O � T ^ � � � mcnn cn D D U) > 0 < > Oz � > D m T � nm � � Dm m D 60 rn 0Om Din D �, = Z z O rD m M � � � z00 rn D U) � m � Nm � _ � 0m a, m > O � � � Z W WN) � v, r 00 z � r � � � Z C ��n -n -n -n SO Dmnn O X Wm rn Xz cfTlr D � C � z ZD MMG7 � � � Z � r -n n0 CO OO ;a mn 17- O- m0 � 0 701 N.Parkcenter Drive Rev. # Date Description 2 THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE INSTRUMENTS Job#: S E 1241 7-ELEVEN INC. m Santa Ana,CA 92705 f OF THE SERVICE AND SHALL REMAIN THE PROPERTY OF 3 01/23/20 REVISED SITE PLAN D THE ARCHITECT AND/OR 7-ELEVEN,INC.WHETHER THE — r p:714/560/8200 3200 HACKBERRY RD., IRVING TEXAS 75063 PROJECT FOR WHICH/THEY ARE MADE IS EXECUTED OR Scale: 3/16 - 1 -0 f:714/560/8211 4 03/17/20 REVISED SITE PLAN — CLIENT NOT.THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIRATIONS SHAEE NOT BE I TA I T �'ww.tait.com 7—ELEVEN #41330 5 04/02/20 REVISED SITE PLAN — 7—ELEVEN N USED BY ANY PERSON OR ENTITY ON OTHER PROJECTS, Issued: 10/07/2020 ARCH IBALD AVE & 9TH ST 6 05/27/20 REVISED SITE PLAN — 7—ELEVEN Anaheim Dallas FOR ADDITIONS TO THIS PROJECT,OR COMPLETION OF THIS since iss4 Los Angeles Boise ELEvEn RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 PROJECT WHEN PHASED,WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT Drawn By: SP Ontario Denver 7 06/30/20 CLIENT REVISIONS OF THE ARCHITECT AND/OR 7-ELEVEN,INC. Sacramento Seattle ® 8 08/28/20 CITY REVISIONS Copyright 2020 Checked By: LR © "TAIT&ASSOCIATES"2020 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FLOOR PLAN �RID� 9 10/07/20 CLIENT REVISIONS Rn ro N =dada= ao a �" �aRnaer ITITIT M ...... .............................. T.O.LOC4NOPV (1) Z U � mQ as as as as as LU as J W ZQ� W a a a Lu >aU ❑ ............ LU .................. a a a a a ® W w J= A m Wum FINI9H FLOOR FINISH FLOOR Q t�Q Z W 2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-EAST(FACING ARCHIBALD AVE.) SCALE: 2 1�� %ooS M-5 F � F � - C T�'O.PARPPEi .O.PNUPEf�' N W II Ul � a m M ' m T.O.LTC CPNOPY � U � � L { W A ❑ U o.CnrvoPv N�,!�6�I1 �@@ gg ageg 51 �5€ss� 2sy a a a a a a a a s a ��® s�� ........................ a FINISH FLOOR FINISH FLOOR ^ E�= r� d 2 Page 663 SHEET A3.O EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST(STOREFRONT) a/1sA p-�^ ti x nu r nu I � I a u I dw m x m f 0 m m I m 0 � O m z m � T a n � z m C) � n o = ;u n r m v z .I � I �I m 6 m b m N elwmMa>ocw>uum am#- SE1241 7-ELEVEN,INC. rear.■ oele one��u • rxliµ lle miilr wie�f+i11u s"J'!3116'+t'-0' I S¢GO w.CKBHWty Rp inViNG TcXAS T- i/xorsnso TAIT 7-ELEVEN#41330 091 wig-,�aE,.,, msnw�liK yen ii� isswe: �a�o9�zoxo ARCHICALBAVE&WMST �� Q r�nla Riel ww w SP •,,,•�• .ry� RANCHO CUCAMONGA.CA 91730 6 /xo dxnT qc usm C7�ed By: MH . E7RERIOR ELEVATIONS 9 ,0107 M [ T HE,A y s e � a � a X m O m . m � D O z m x z m O m � O m wi 9i D wi of "i 9i m O = z Cn Cn O m c m N m � z sy � O CD m rn 61 CA lasfr�yans ar I..—I eao seau.mum Job#: SE1241 :,"„q,,,�,9R105 7—ELEVEN,INC. R@� Defe Description D ti 9 PPoPa0. 01 9 1amiC 1WIn Ot/23/20 RENSEO SI E PAN 3200 HACKBERRV RD.,IRVING TEXAS 75063 Mfl lBI YW9 9®&OIm 0A 90I I�9 n Scale 3/16"-=1'-0" 6 03/1]/20 RE—S SITE PUN-CLIENT mnaas ano srrcuEafroes suia am ea TAIT ��omFff. 7—ELEVEN#41330 s 0s/o2/2o RENSEO SITE PUN—]—ELEKN Issued: 12/10/2020 ARCHIBALD AVE 8 9TH ST os/2]/zo - - � RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730I--ay}m Pmm WI Pa69n. DT@Wn By: SP os/30/20 cse..em"„�" e.a�n• OB/28/20 cEASONS .naa Checked By: LR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ao/o]/zo c MATERIAL SAMPLES k k k k z VINTFGEW OD CEDAR EMPIREBLOCN GRAY 888 qq t p NPCHIHA FIBER CEMENT SIDING FIBER CEMENT PANELS C E s z s oa D A �nva uaa ivare. uwru� 154 DARN BRONZE SILVERPONTE-SW 785E CENTRIA-EOONOLAP IR' I SHERWN WILLLAIAS CORRUGATED METAL SIDING N �$0 JT w9 C Lv J m' w e TRLCORNBLACN-5WWM REFLECTIVE WHITE-SATW w SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHERWINVALLAAMS n C E C E C E E H E i3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREETS ,g E 2 pl. ■ m FINISHES EIFSSTSTU FIa$N;$TIh^CO d SFR: STOREFRONT DNT p g FINISH:ANppIgDAIIAANDM MFR: FIBER CEMENT SIDING k FINISH:VINTAGEWODD-CEDER MFR: NICHIHA F 3 FIBER CEMENT PANELS FINISH:EMPIHEBLOOK-GRAY F MFR: NICHIHA CORRUGATED METAL SIDING a FII$H:DARK BROmm J T IAFR: CEHTRIA n r� _ Pc� PETAL CLADDING N -. LJ Fes:EMPIIRESL.00K•GRAY MFR: y. m MATERIAL SAMPLES . NkFIKA FIBER O PAENT Sum .. B-IREBLOCR•GRAY NLCHIHA FIBER CEMENT PANEL Byk�yyu� e ... CENTR NBRONZE E�S�i� � C GENTILE E +lL n� y 51lVERPOINTE-SYY 7859 9 SHERWIN WILLIALIS E TRICORN BLACK-SW 6258 A B D T� E $NERwINvaI.LWMg @ REFLECTIVE WHITE•$W 7757 is $HERWIN"LLWA$ PATS 985 G Page�. 666A3.1 C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-SOUTH , , 1 sLAa MATERIAL SAMPLES .|§ )I§ ___,_ � |||||§ __ma �l +7. m�� m 7 � ■� � K | AMS z !-LLI z u LLJ■ ! ' ¥a -j _ �. . Lij ~} \ ) � \ ' � | c EXTERIOR ELEVATION-Nd T(FACING 9TH STR ) 2 FINISHES ) ] ___ , ■ MFR FlNlSH: ��O r | « � � § f «', � k ; § | � � °l-, / i 21 | MATERIAL SAMPLES | AESTHETIC WMTE-SW 7M -, -UAYAS . am_____ § ' SHEET Page�5 A3.2C EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST . \ 1 — KEYNOTES INTERCOM CALL B-MECHANICALLY FASTENEU TO COLUMN. i MWNT AT 461NCHES MA%.ABOVE SIAB TO BUTTON _ Ed OFIRE E%iINGUISHER-ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE MAK.1&INCHES FROM GRADE TO PAPER TOWEL OPENING S �3 -ET dFEETRLUMINATED LOGO SIGN(UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) r S S S S S OTATE—A IMAGE TRISTRIPE(NON-ILLUMINATED) OOVERFLOW PROTECTION AS REQUIRED.SEE CANOPY DRAWINGS AND SPECIFIQANONS n N �B WASHBUCKET ADA MOUNTING HEIGHT TO BE MAK. 14CHES FROM GRADETO PAPER rc TOWEL OPENING GASDISPENSER - OCANOPY COLUMN O\ ACM CANOPY FASCW i IT'If �TSB �f - TO.CPNOPY�' 1E0 NOT USED 3 O NOT USED s _ RO.CANOPY 1�2 NOT USED 4 9 B 13 PARKING BOLLARD STORESIDE STREETSIDE Ln N z F° O Z v=a a _z C) w Zrc_ mz w W z > B W> wo wU 0 �H > Z O aN LLQ Jrc wUU a _j W w o n Ja= IJ B�. a LL1 z FINISH FLW = a w K 13 T TYP. TYP. EXTERIOR ELEVATION-NORTH(FACING 9TH STREET) SCALE: z 1�. W iE 38os a$f ah, F � F � T-V 11 21" J - J - J J 3 1I 1I 11 1I it it it it ]'$' 1 T.O O R N Y = N � � W G N4'E',L U1 .. B.O. O T m m m x c m W AO U R 0 MUMS—I 13 TYP FINISH FLOOR' a Page 666 SHEET: A3.2 EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST ,4°";Eo. 1 (2)WHORIZOMABPR AT TOP BOND BEAM GENERAL NOTES 2d'OVERLAP AROUNOGORNERS. S'X S'X 1S'PRECISION BLOCKSOUG 1. TRASH ENCLOSURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOW: GROUT INTERIOR SURFACE TO BE SMOOTH A ROOF WITH A MINIMUM CLEARANCE HEIGHT TO ALLOW THE BIN LID TO COMPLETELY i ANDNONABSORBANT.APPLVAIPHATIC OPEN R . _ UEI EGLOSSENPMEL-DEVTHAN— CMU WALL GAP tt B.CONSTRUCTED OF REINFORCED MASONRY WITHOUT WOODEN GATES,AND WALL BY IC.DEVOE COATING OVER EPDXY (COL— SHALL BE AT LEAST S FEET HIGH. PRIMER-TRU GLAEE WB d030 BY ICI. MATCH WALL) C,PROVISION OF CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR. STUCCO PAINT TO MATCH BUILDING. D.ALL TRASH BINS INTHETRASH ENCLOSURESHALSEIEANPROOFWITH UDSTHAT p a Q Q Q z EXTERIOR FINISH STUCCO PAIM ARECONTINUOUSLYKEPTGLOSED, u _ MIN.2 COATS TO MATCH BUILDING N -- 9 r--- ❑o INTERIOR ANORIZONTAL REBAR AT TOP S MID HEIGHT SIDE W VERTICAL REBAR AT 16 O.G.IN PGG FILLED CELLS WITH ALTERNATE BENDS Q\ N ry GA.METAL WEEP SCREED 321 A4 GONT REBAR TOP AND BOnOM 'CLEAR FROM EDGE OF FOUNDATION "' ^4 3"OUR. A15 fi Y :.21 ....: WALL SECTION P,gC-- 1 BIM A1.5 n M N n 0 U M�a wU) Z> G) > �a❑ 8 8 9 8 B ;p W Jp Q O PO T.G.ENCLOSURE i.O.ENCLOSURE Lu >a ZZ FRAMING h FRAMING J p �f,�m❑ Q S Lu W1O zd U Ir Qp F J Q Q ry tltl = p P. W A1.5 REF.GML ENCL.S go CIVIL ENCLOSURE ELEVATION S°ALE: 6 ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: C HEALY ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 4 KEYNOTES � • 3l8'=1'-0" 3/8'=1'-0' J 3l8"=1'-0" 1 W �1 T"THICK KC LOADING PAD OVER 9D%COMPACTED BASE,4%MAXIMUM SLOPE. 13 12 SLOPE PF—PVC SLEEVES IN CONCRETE TYP. DI-PER FT. ➢q m B.O.ENCLOSURE ROOFh �3 fi'PCC CURB AROUND INSIDE PERIMETER OF ENCLOSURE. %ooS B.O.ENCL.ROOF �4 fi'PIPE BOLLARD FILLED WITH CONCRETE TYP.OF 5. opt p_g TYP. T TYP. s 9 6 14 �5 [ S'XS'X1fi PRECISON BLOCKWITH STUCCO FINISH _ 6U[ 6gpo i TO.ENCLOSURE FIT Io SU O 10"XPXIA-SOLIDCONCRETECPP. N (3)HEAVYDUTY METAL HINGE,COMNUOUSLYWELDEDTOGATE ANDJAMSTUBE. L f 131S'CORRUGATED META PANEL WELDED TO-META ANGLE WITH DIAGONAL r p TYP § S 1 ) 9 BRACING,CONTIN000S WELDALJOINTS:PRIMEANDVAINT. `` e SlIS'META PLATE WITH SUDE BOLTASSEMBLY WELDED IN PLACE. r — C 11 10 9 CANE BOLT MID CANE BELT RECEPTACLE . ENCLOSURE tiE 1�1 S'RAISED PPC WAKWAV. ❑ NO IL 1.5 3 Q, S ENCL SLABA a a - -- -- S 1�2 HSS SM---BEAM(TYP.) rr f N N v. w p o 13 SHEET META ROOFING,OVERHANG PAST CMU WALL BELOW FTYP.) N a B 5 b ]1Y114'STEEL COLUMN,PAINTED IB'EMBED,11Px312'SO PLWELD ASA-FROM Q ' L9 SCALE: 4C.Y.DUMPGtER 4GY.DUMPSTER '❑° TDP x SIDE ENCLOSURE ELEVATION 3 m i PROVIDEo9r w PRD DERBY w i m 3l8"=1'-0" OTHERS O OTHERS l o OILIGRE45E 15 GIITTERWIDOWNSPOUTDISCHARGINGATAD ENTLANDSCAPEARE4 q L CDNTAINER -°, rn - ❑ U T t t 0 2'FASCN a1.5 �e ,z 13 to _ T.O.ENCLOSURE 14 g —ENCLOSURE fi FRAMING - ��e5 T ] TYEl P. y n LJ LJ� 2— ENREF CMBL 2 A15 SHEET: S 10 8 5 B Page 660 q1.5 FRONT ENCLOSURE ELEVATION SCALE: 2 TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN SCALE: 1 Ar • r • - 4 lpi •. � • • y� k a�r',Co-'_ s '-`5.-. OoiFrr 44 n . � M1. . . -q,s +�- 0Rk aF � ������!✓AA�• �.r •,• ar^'��Tj a �����[�:'l. ^J• '^�,, _ Elm *MTAcO �.�'"��►I����'E y?�ec�� ` _..,. - vr' :::�5'-.. `.r _"'pr• yea. '•-� +' .?' =.1ia TWAAppFAr NONE ���ia f'�' (� EDO �,�,Ca� _ 1 x k• Y "P'� `�- ■ �,�•. - _ \. - - �r r. 'ff``•7 1 •�l•tiF7' ��.,,� y��.;'v. �• � � .r .�+, .'�_ 7M _ 'a•..� _ -�•}_s l{" r c '+`Cr '.r4�'�. _ � t -S.�niy.�r.-•.�. ." A.. �b -• - w� .r - .�R S. •ar+ i� r sF• k��.� �.'f �•� �-~ `� .+^ - �•' J. 7 sT ,7. r ' - '�1 S • . • lam.. 1 I ms�ewsawc�slraee-.wcss s rra�eevr:r.�nwraus • 'I', .� ,r 's�� +'.v{i- i� I r.;r p � l r�� 7�{ ,�i,;x i nsiiu��ev,n�r,srs�r.nrr rr•F.es '-w�• ��rrow•i vn+rr. W' - „f 1 Et, :!' 1 l! }l � o-rn n.�: +m -r rrarrrn?�.r, w•+.,y_ r 1 '� ,� "� I',,f i , r �1. .i _ r.f r'. ,�' F.+ .�l r ., .i'.+. � r�.• .. <<r .i , i , .+ i �. a :r 1 1 . f 4. "1 M rri ti o A An Elf -- �� _ =�- r \ ,ray - r - •tip � � _ .� •..,t. ._ ..• �-. _ i ^ter . . . r-'_-?,, -'� .• - � - �r,. ,'fir' •. +>«� � �^'. I - � � '�•4 III ,��. SI _::ti.:',�„'.a`�r.�,r -:••' .- �.` - f .. ev y-[, EF � !iw — v jp� ti 4. n { • • 1 1 1 1 PLANTING LEGEND TREES SYMBOL TREE NAME QTY. WUCOLS STREET TREE ALONG 9TH STREET CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA, CAMPHOR TREE 4 M 9TH STREET 24" BOX SIZE. 30'-0" Q.C. � R'O'W' I _ PROPOSED MONUMENT 4 SIGN PER ARCH. DWGS. STREET TREE ALONG ARCHIBALD AVENUE dda PLATANUS RACEMOSA, CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 5 M 24" BOX SIZE. 30'-0" O.C. O ° A r d 7- 4. BIKE RACK PER QUERCUS VIRGINIAN& SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 6 M ARCH. DWGS. ' ` a PATIO PER a a a t 36„ BOX SIZE_ STANDARD TRUNK. d d- �� aa. A ARCH. DWGS. a d e a d 1 4 i d a- d PARKING LOT SHADE TREE TREE a ao o d . . . P.L. ea a 4= QUERCUS ILEX, HOLLY OAK 5 L P O 24" BOX SIZE. d d a r a 4 e de a � p0 OL� � - o a a ° ■ SECONDARY PARKING LOT TREE 6 L COMMERCIAL PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR, FERN PINE STORAGE 4 a a ■. 15 GAL. SIZE. d e ■ d R.O.W. w EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE AT PROPERTY LINE %� roe ■ ;d z GEIJERA PARVIFLORA, AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 14 M ° #4 ■ - 15 GAL. SIZE. 7—ELEVEN w STORE Q a , 4 FLOWERING ACCCENT TREE CERCIDIUM 'DESERT MUSEUM' PALO VERDE 11 L oID M.. nq r a d 1.!.V ■ a m 36 BOX SIZE a . °' ■ ' d ° x — ALTERNATE: LAGERSTROEMIA I. 'NATCHEZ' a ° ■ � C? /_) o ■ Q Q SHRUBS - PROPOSED SHRUBS WILL BE SELECTED FROM THE FOLLOWING: ao o Q ■ SYMBOL SHRUB NAME WUCOLS ' A ■ a e e LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS, TEXAS RANGER a ° `` ° TRANSFORMER ■ L . _PER ARCH DWGS ■ 5 GAL. SIZE a© o ■ PRUNUS CAROLINIANA 'MONUS', BRIGHT 'N TIGHT CAROLINA LAUREL a d e a d• as dd ■ d 4 d a a a 15 GAL. SIZE L EVERGREEN SCREEN -x WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA, COAST ROSEMARY SHRUBS AROUND L TRANSFORMER. 5 GALLON a 5 GAL. SIZE SIZE MINIMUM fl � anoo� � CALL I STEM ON 'LITTLE JOHN', LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH L o . 4- 5 GAL. SIZE W w W W W W Y f W Y W LAURUS NOBILIS, SWEET BAY w IV W W w w w W w d 1 / 4 15 GAL. SIZE L 'fJ w w a f d e d aI& 1p �, LIGUSTRUM JAPONICUM 'TEXANUM', WAXLEAF PRIVET ° a 5 GAL. SIZE M 0 ROSMARINUS 'TUSCAN BLUE', TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY L 5 GAL. SIZE ti D DODONAEA VISCOSA, HOPSEED BUSH M �2f° �x 15 GAL. SIZE TRASH ENCLOSU GROUND COVER AND SHRUB MASSES PER ARCH. DWG RE SYMBOL GROUND COVER/SHRUB MASS NAME WUCOLS LANTANA 'GOLD RUSH', LANTAN GOLD RUSH ::;', w w 1 GAL. SIZE @ 24" O.C. L O ' w SENECIO REPENS, BLUE CHALKSTICKS " 1 GAL. SIZE L O O ALOE 'BLUE ELF', BLUE ELF ALOE L 1 GAL. SIZE P.L. ALOE STRIATA, CORAL ALOE L 1 GAL. SIZE SALVIA 'BEE'S BLISS', BEE'S BLISS SAGE L 1 GAL. SIZE SALVIA 'ALLEN CHICKERING', ALLEN CHICKERING SAGE GENERAL NOTES: IRRIGATION NOTE: 5 GAL. SIZE L • SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL THE PROJECT WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A LOW FLOW IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSISTING ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS', PROSTRATE ROSEMARY GROUND COVER PER LEGEND, AND MULCH MATERIAL WITH 'BINDER' OF ET WEATHER BASED SMART CONTROLLER, LOW FLOW ROTORS, BUBBLER AND/ OR 1 GAL. SIZE L MATERIAL SHALL BE APPLIED FOR EROSION CONTROL. DRIP SYSTEMS USED THROUGHOUT. THE IRRIGATION WATER EFFICIENCY WILL MEET OR SURPASS THE CURRENT STATE MANDATED AB-1881 WATER ORDINANCE. BACCHARIS P. 'TWIN PEAKS', DWARF COYOTE BRUSH • ROCK RIP-RAP MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE DRAIN LINES 1 GAL. SIZE L CONNECT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. TYP. EROSION CONTROL DROUGHT TOLERANT BANK PLANTING SUCH ALL UTILITY EQUIPMENT SUCH AS TRANSFORMERS, BACKFLOW UNITS, FIRE WUCOLS PLANT FACTOR AS BACCHARIS MIXED WITH ASSORTED GRASSES. M DETECTOR CHECKS AND FIRE CHECK VALVES WILL BE SCREENED WITH THIS PROJECT f5 LOCATED IN 'WUCOLS' EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL ONCE FINAL LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN REGION '4-SOUTH INLAND VALLEY'. DETENTION BASIN BOTTOM SHALL RECEIVE A HYDROSEED MIX M DETERMINED. w CONSISTING OF THE FOLLOWING: H = HIGH WATER NEEDS M = MODERATE WATER NEEDS + ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM 1.0 LBS/ ACRE CONCEPTUAL PLAN NOTE: L = LOW WATER NEEDS + ESCHSCHOLZIA CAESPITOSA 1.0 LBS/ACRE VL= VERY LOW WATER NEEDS • JUNCUS BUFONIUS 1.0 LBS/ ACRE THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT IS BASED ON PRELIMINARY • LEYMUS TRITICODIDESRIO 6.0 LBS/ACRE INFORMATION WHICH IS NOT FULLY VERIFIED AND MAY BE INCOMPLETE. IT IS • DESCHAMSIA DESPITOSA 4.0 LBS!ACRE MEANT AS A COMPARATIVE AID IN EXAMINING ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT • FESTUCA RUBRA 'MOLATE' 10.0 LBS/ ACRE STRATEGIES AND ANY QUANTITIES INDICATED ARE SUBJECT TO REVISION AS MORE • HORDEUM BRACHYANTHERUM 6.0 LBS/ACRE RELIABLE INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE. • MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS 1.0 LBS/ ACRE • MUHLENBERGIA MICROSPERMA 3.0 LBS/ACRE ■ HORDEUM DEPRESSUM 3.0 LBS/ ACRE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 20' 40' 60' 1` 1IL NORTH SCALE: 1 " = 20'41 ND 7- ELEVEN CORNER OF 9TH STREET & ARCHIBALD AVENUE SCOTT PETERSON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, INC. 2883 VIA RANCHEROS WAY ELEVEn DATE: 12/09/2020 FALLBROOK, CA 92028 RANCHO U AM N A, CA PH: 760-842-8993 Lml Page 579 Page671 W W W W W W EVERGREEN SCREEN SHRUBS ADJACENT TO EX.TRANSFORMER. W W 5 GALLON SIZE MINIMUM P.L. EX.TRANSFORMER Page 690 PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 \ m \ / APPLICANT (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 ° APN 02 CHASE ORBIS EaSTEVAIE,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA Z NG: GENE L IN ST IAL p II \ \ / APN: 0209-041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE v ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 m \ / (949)330-7562 TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 0 -=TEOH N. 25- - HI / UTILITY PROVIDERS w n NINTH STREET EX.SERVICE\ J / I STORM: BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PUBUC WORKS 909 387-7995 PROP.40'DRIVEWAY PER 259' / r BAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL 909 297-14]0 BUD DWG.101 TYPE C \ ; / CITY OF RANCGO CUCAMONGA 909 477-2]40 SEVER CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 98]-2591 EX.PULL BOX TO REMAIN - -C4-- - I \ WATER: CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT 909 987-2591 1124.89 TO 11280]TC 1124.89 FS RELOCATE EX.SIGN I REMOVE AND \ ° GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY 909 335-7955 E%.FIRE HYDRANT 1124.25 EL 1124.45 FL m 1124.8fi Fs- PROP. S/W REPLACE RAMP ELECTRIC: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 909 329-9445 ° TN REMAIN 1125--A - TELEPHONE: AT&T 800 331-0500 EX.TRAFFIC SIGNAL PN: 0209-054-79 CABLE: CHARIER CABLE 909 975-3398 N I EX.R/W n - AND PULL BOX TO / 5 _ - N89'50'01'W 219.46'= REMAIN ; v> m : MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) EX.TREE TO REMAIN 1124.B9 BW.. ��112456 FS •• --.. ... �• 6r N i �/' '.'.1124.61,FS'.'.'..'.N44'0UIUU 2].95' vl, �-1125- EX.LIGHT i0 REMAINS L 1124.69 BW I '�1124.]8'FS ."44 BUILDING; \ PROPOSED RAMP SITE DATA 1124.93 TC '1125.06 TC _ 1124.]4 F5 SETBACK x 1124.26FL '.`. 1124.56 FS ''''''"� '.'.�'.;.�. ; I \ SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE L ?¢m \ / RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 1124.81TC 1124.57T 1124.68F5' o• 1123.]2 . I EX. TRAFFIC SIGN L O um 6 5 11243]FS - 9 �i o ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-0000 _ 1124.07 FS PROPOSED BIKE RACK - AND PULL BOX TO / 1124.74 TC' - REMAIN 1123.21 TC .N 112424 F5 PROPOSE ', 'y` 3),„(({'''45'BUILD 'PROPOSED THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES. RIVERSIDE 1122.]t FS \jam,, GREASE n\/ .'.1'.).'SETBACK ING 1 I 11 I COUNTIES PAGE 6021NIRD j VERS "o .1123.501P'20• .. .. ......... I / {I I u X _, - INTERCEPTOR Y.......:1 1 MONUMENTS 1 ZONING/LAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1 ---- / N a oap 1123.61T1117.73TNV 1124.18 S o 1118821NV { / EX SIDEWALK I,i 3 0l FEMA: FEMA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. ^T 1+�i•1 ''•" •• 1. = I TO REMAIN / �I APN: 0209-054-80 FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA E c� 111].591NV ...... \ - / ZONING: MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC SUBJECT TO I PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOW EVENT .m a3� 112435 FF "" 6 ' / ) LEGEND CONSTRUCTION NOTES w o 5[ I 1124.35 FS... PROP.FIRE WATER L 1122.OFS -'1124.35F5'�'�-'... PROP DOMES PROPERTY LINE O x ^ n- - 605' TIC WATER ---- 1 CONCRETE CURBLi n e I , 11. 1124.35 FF ry PROP.IRRIGATION WAIERI / - CENTER LINE w o O2 CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER o� --________ z 5.' 28.' 20 30 20' 6' ,„ 56.1', 56' 44.96' -\ O •- ®�i _ t I ----- EASEMENT OR SETBACK LINE 3 3'WIDE VALLEY GUTTER Y t Il+oi•II f ... 9 01 I ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL O4 ACCESSIBLE RAMP WITH DETECTABLE - I ice. 1.5. I ' n I - GRADE BREAK WARNINGS 1124.20TC: 1124.35 FF o- ..w I \ 3 O \ \ PROPOSED SPOT GRADE 5 CURB CUT 1123.70FS ]ELE\fN I XX.XX T STORE \� X%.XX FS UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN WITH GRAVEL PAD i 6,000 SF \\ I ty� 111435 EF -- o \ vNi / + XX.XX TC EXISTING SPOT GRADE 7 BIORETENTION BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS o \ 11z3a5 pnn / / XX.X%FS AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE E - gIn DETAIL 1,SHEET 2. PROPOSED PROPOSED FLOW / p ELECTRICAL \ /3 / 1 I 2.00% (DIRECTION AND SLOPE) O B AND OVERFLOW BASIN WITH UNDERDRAINS n q METER CABINET1124.26 FS �\/ / I I AND OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE.SEE 5 PARCEARMAP 8653 �z \ I+oi•I 1124.35 FS 6 / °I _ DETAIL 2.SHEET 2. o $" I I - LANDSCAPE/ m PROPOSED °1124.18 � 4.6. �1121.97 TC)'?tf I PLANTER AREA O9 BIOSWALE 90/21-22 �r 20 TRANSFORMER.. 1124.14'F5 2 1�12149 FL \\\ j o 10 HEADWALL O E. 112241 TO o �T _ 9 1121 6 1121.85 TC STANDARD DUTY >° ________ B III 1.91FS1+ i+1 1122.]FL \ 11 CATCH BASIN o 0 EX.RIBBON 11 ... � ... 1121 37 FL / CONCRETE PAVEMENT CUTER TO REMAIN '.'.'.'... "' "" "'1119.OTFG / / ° -J Ed 1122.88TC, - EX.PL 1122.38FS .1123.04'FS: : '.1121.05 FS :EX R WTI.. ] N \ 1 APN: 0209-054-82 ° T7T 1i22.8iTP 10 / \ / ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) p` cs _ � ::'S .. . sorc m\/ 3 / I lQ _ ESTIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES �� o - PROPOSED- -� q 1119.56 FL \ I - - _ OIL&WATER PROPOSED ::: 21121.001'C,,,, .� I I CUT: 153 CY SEPARATOR 1120.00 FG.' 1 O AIR&WATER _ ^Y /m T �� a 95"' U FILL 5,457 CY 1T122.37TC 1120 m nQA^° PROP.SEWER FS 1121.42 TC ,l 3 112068 FL 1120�65 TC O `�^\� / NET: 5,304 Cy FILL ` Ui f '" T1113.38INV 1120.92 FL L,\� 8 \ 1120 1120.15 FS 1 Q NOTE:THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING GROUND pµry rE 1109.4]IN TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE.EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT GRADES ON m$ __ THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON THE >e /w 1121.93 TO 1121.52 TC 11 _ 1120.32 TC° - \ / GRADING PLAN(S). Q w PROPOSED HEALY 1121.43 FL 2 1121.02 TO 1P' 1119.82E Z 1v ERID E : PRO PGEED I' 1121.27 TCI 3 2 EX.FlRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN I ACCOUNTHE RTHFNNCHANGESEIN ABOVE VOLUME REDUER TO BIULKINGPOCLEARING ANDS ONLY, GRUBBING HAW ?SHR NKAGEEEN �ROVERED � _ 0 9 LOT LINE e 112077,FL EXCAVATION AND RE-COMPACTION, N 5 C i FOR THE /^ \��.•..• 1121 1120e� .. '.'.\' 1`PR OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINS,DSLABS,CONSTRUCTION OF E PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW EW •�v I OP.40'DRIVEWAY PER \ PAVEMENTS, ETC, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ESTIMATES FOR BIDDING x ---------- --- N89'49'29"W 236119 S 111955 Tf. --- 1119.5 Tf ••a b T STD.TWO.101 TYPE C I° \ PURPOSES. J a E* ) 111011TC. -7 1119.21 TC \ Iy/ PRoposeD TRasH n18A1T LEGAL DESCRIPTION /L�u �� n$ I/ - ENCLOSURE) I) \` I\\ IT / PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO.8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS,PAGE 21 AND yV 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. ^ 9 EX.RIBBON EX.DRIVEWAY / LL _ GUTTER To REMAIN- o BE BENCHMARK PARCEL 1 REMOVE EXISTING -m REMOVED) d S -- - a PARKING WTHIN / I 2'BRASS DISK IN TOP OF CURB STAMPED"CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BM 10041A 2009"AT THE --- PARCEL MAP 1528 N SHARED ACCESS 1 \ / No CORNER OF FOOTHILL BOULEVARD AND ARCHIBALD AVENUE 1.0!WESTERLY FROM THE END OF PMB 14/56 Q E%.TRANSFORMER CURB RETURN ON FOOTHILL BOULEVARD.ELEVATION 1207.70 0 o RE-STRIPE TO E ACCOMMODATE n \ o E APN: 0209-032-34 ADDITIONAL 3 0 EASEMENT NOTES ¢ ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARKING z \ \ / I APN: 0209-054-78 SITE AREA ° •\ \ \ 3 1, EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND J \ v, ZONING: MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED TOTAL SITE AREA I.8]ACRES J ry APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164,PAGE 144]OF _ EXISTING BUILDING \ \ / / 1 OFFICIAL RECORDS. TOTAL DISTURBED AREA I.7]ACRES to w °- Q4 2. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES ~I. • _-____--_ 4 \ \ I R \ / 80 8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04.1984 ON FILE IN fV W BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF PARCEL MAPS EXISTING PERVIOUS I.]8 ACRES Z ul I 589'S000"E 235.06' PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES ~w E i w8 _ rca ______ - u ------------- \ \�^ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES _� a U REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES Ow LU Q aa� W °o PARCEL 2 -__--- -_-- PARCEL MAP 1528 ILL a- H w F _ EMS 14/56 I \\ \\ I I W a LL.O APN: 0209-032-37 -- -----ll \ \\ / APN: 0209-054-76 NORTH ILL W 3 Z a ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ / } ZONING: MEDIUM(8-t4 DU/AC) r i io m O co GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET =E FLOOD ZONE X FLOOD ZON E A\ N Ur1L 3D 6D E= 1 X / I I SHET NUMBER $ SE 1 OF 2 a aMir„�,4F 7N:MAS M aW1E VIDE CO2,CIA]J-3(2009) a s]E i 8 mxxa R W EAL LxntiW(a-14 DU/x) 1128 112E �EOH EOH NMm-/S (N sc FG 27. r 9 ,Ex noE I p L ... EL-o' 1124 MA 1124 .. EG 1120 I.a�Y muu(e�e w/AC) 113. 9 ax 5.6, 28.5 20' 30' 20' S/W 60.5 S/W 56' S6' A LANDSCAPE DRIVE GAS DRIVE ARKING BUILDING LANDSCAPE HALF-STREET -- AISLE PUMPS AISLE ARCHIBALD BLVD 1118 =ry m x o 1114 1114 O w E 0.. - 2 11+00 12+00 13+00 L7 »:...... is o a- m, HORIZON o-4�AD SECTION A— GJ w oo fi 9 TAIL SCALE 1"=30" 'z O .......... E2 F VERTICAL SCALE 1"-3' � o HR W o. 28 1128 IS T rfi m 1 FG z f o D ueszs 2R 2% W p 0 1124 MA% TAX- 1124 _ b' i I EG k s$ _ _ 1120 1120 n� <o F.u./sss" 4. a. ado m _37 -`LA SC APE S/W S/W 29' u- Ixc xum1.x(a4 Du Ac) 30' HALF-STREET o 16' DRIVE AISLE 19' 35' 111' 53' 23' NI N1H ST ` - TRASH ARKING LANDSCAPE BUILDING PADO LANDSCAP rc[SECTION M A r 1116 ENCLOSURE 1116 1'-50' 1114 1114 z EX. Ex' 21+00 22+00 23+00 O SOVIHERLY NORTHERLY R/W R/W m 5 (66') o F (29•) (37) nD'> n9) 25') n2) SECTION B—B W o$ 2E'X.M�, HORIZONTAL SCALE 1"=30" E IXVEMEM DERING _Ex.CURBVERTICAL SCALE —3PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER IX.CURB 18^TO BIORETEN110N BOTTOM n S k GUTTER k GUTTER ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN \ 3n ADJGINING SIZE STRUCTURES PER PLAN o E PROP,SIDEWALK BASE COURSE o p COMPACTED SUB-GRADE _ 2_4^OF OVERFLOW - } 2-4^OF OVERFLOW - MULCH DRAIN ?P MULCH DRAIN NINTH STREET - NOT TO SCALE J o t Ex. EASTERLY r--=lall -I=1 T-i _- -->i- N_ W 5 e WESTERLY ENGINEERED II II II-III I_ ENGINEERED o$ R/W SOIL MEDIA 1311 -I_I -II III- SOIL MEDIA Z D. R/W (VARIES 100'-1044) _' (60-80,: IJ'I-I� -11 III-I (60-80% 0= a (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96') ASTM C33 -III II ASTM C33 O Q U �� 4 20ND40% -,IIFII I 20N40Y. �a LU�I (VARIES) (VARIES 41.5'-455't) (32') (12.96') COMPOST -1'I-' COMPOST -W a PER WOMP - PER WOMP Z a~Z W (VARIES 5' REPORT) REPORT) W W D)U F a y 3 IXISi.AC c'i < U Y N F Y i 5 PAVEMEM Ex.MEANDERING V• `"°Vh '-"� W Q.W R O J= Ex.SIDEW01_K IX.CURB IX.CURB SIDEWALK J J d 3 Q k CURER k GUTTER 6 PERFORATED 6 PERFORATED W W 3 Z U rMZO 5 WRAP EN D30 MIL IN PVC PIPE NRAP EN 30E MILSPVC PVC PIPE h Z U - BASE COURSE NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO p5] NON-PERMEABLE LINER AASHTO p5] (q ro O $$ COMPACTED SUB-GRADE GRAVEL GRAVEL m N U 3'THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"THICK LAVER OF PE ARCHIBALD AVENUE capvEL GRAVEL page 692 NOT TO SCALE SHEET NUMBER DETAIL-1 DETAIL-2 p 2�F 2 a€ 811YnnA N.T.S. N.T.S. : BMP INSPECEION/MAINTENANCFACWIR6 LEGEND c RFSPONSIBIE PARTYIS) REQUIRED MINIMUM FREQUENCY Of ACIIVIflFS EOH EO — -1125� _ \ EOH`-�: OWNER WILL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF/HERSELF I \ V RIGHT OF WAY/PROPERTY LINE a EDUCATION OF PROPERTY OWNERS,TENANTS, WITH THE EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS PROVIDED NINTH STREET AND OCCUPANTS ON STORMWATER BURNS OWNER \ ;� - CENTERLINE YEARLY / ° (BMP NI) W-NTHISWOMPANG EDUCFTETENANTS _ _ - _ _ - a AND EMPLOYEES. / K� DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT BOUNDARY GARDENING AND LAWN CARE PRACTIICESTO _———1125 LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT IBMP N3) OWNER PREVENT LANDSCAPE WATER FROM EXITING WEEKLY _ \ \ / -—-(147)-—-EXISTING CONTOURS THE PROJECT SITE. 14] PROPOSED CONTOURS HAZARDOUS WASTES AS DEFINED BYTTLE 22 _ ............ TIE 22 OCR COMPLIANCE IBMP NE) OWNER CCR WILL BE MANAGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONGOING 'S "� .r EH. .! \ \/ / —�—F—F_£_FLOW LINE n THE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTALH—I. 23 : .. z DEPARTMENT. PROP.BIOSWALE STESPECIFIC SPILLCOMINGENCl PLAN SHALL o I\ \ O T BMP IH3, - I SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN \ \ / S SPILLCONTINGENCYPIANIBMPN71 OWNER BEMADEAVAIIABI£FORTENANTSAND ONGOING \ S4,SS E'T - \ III EMPLOYEES. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN \r OWNERS TO ABIDE BYTHE STATE,COUNTY, \- 1122 _ o o` J'•' 2 I \ \ Z r UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK COMPLIANCE AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH \ BMP N3, \ ® EXISTING CATCH BASIN OWNER ONGOING fIII (BMP NS) DEPARTMENT ANDLOCALUIILIIY l.6,1154,$SL 2 REGULATIONS. BMP N11,N15q; lp ��. J ' \ / $ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DISCLOSURE OWNERS TO ABIDE BY RESPECTIVE FIRE \ Q PROPOSED CATCH BASIN COMPUANCE(BMP N9) OWNER PROTECTIIONAGENCYREGUTADONSfORTHE ONGOING 1.e,1% MANAGEMENT OF HAZARDOUS MATERIAS. ROP.BIOSWALE / �DEXISTING STORM DRAIN MANHOLEUNIFORM FIRE CODE IMPLEMENTATION(BMP N10) OWNER COMPLY WITH CAUFORNIA FIRE CODE. ONGOING77 LC BMPPROPOSEDOD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 7-ELEVEN E I \ LIMB SHALL BE PICKED UP TRASH ENCLOSURE oy LNTER/DEBRIS CONTROL PROGRAM(BMP NII) OWNER AREAS SHALL BE SWEPTANO CLEANED, WEEKLY 6,60D$F. I \\ \T / /�T J `^'� DIRECTION OF WATER FLOW L i�a r DUMPSIERG SHALL BE EMPTIED. l PROP.BIORETENTION. \ / o fi NTH UNDERDRAINS:ii::i�i�. I.oT� E PER BIO-1 DETAIL:: ::::�: \\ / / I O <u n _ ENSU0.E TENANTS ARE FAMILIAR WITH ONSIIE LAT:34.094954'�: \ / DMA ID - BMPS AND ASSOCIATED MAINTENANCE 7 Jr .I DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT AREA LABEL REQUIRED.OWNER WILL CHECK WITH CItt LONG:-117.593]88': 2BE ° AND COUNUAT LFASTONCE AYEARTO OBTAIN NEW/UPDATED EDUCATION 1120 11 "" 1\ \\ I <Nw o EMPLOYEE TRAINING IBMP N12) OWNER MATERIALSAND PROMDE THESE MATERIALS YEARLY 5 \ Fe TOTENANTS.EMPLOYEES SHALL BE MINED TOCLEANUPSPILLSANDPARTOPATE IN _ 9 RMP N4 L \ G`+ ONGOING MAINTENANCE.THE WQMP E%.R \ \ / J I LANDSCAPED AREA cu > E^ REQUIRES ANNUAL EMPLOYEE TRAINING AND \ \/ I o ofi TRAINING FOR NEW HIRES WITHIN 2 MONTHS. / 1/ 9 / la - LAT 34.594241' ; BMP N14,51 NI INSPECT,CLEAN AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE PRIOR TO RAINY SEASON AND AFTER EVERY LONG:-11].594241'0 CATCH BASIN INSPECTION BMP NI4) OWNER FACILITIES. PAIN EVENTGREATERTHAN 0.5INCHES. ) 1,5 :.. BMP53g \ I !9 ® o - �'/I �ry „2p a vv I r KEY NOTES Y VAIUUMSWEBRING OF PRIVATE STREETS AND PARKING LOTS ANO PRIVATESTREETSMUSTBE QUARTERLY(MINIMUM),WEEKLY DURING - - , / 4 MA- \ ' / O PROPOSED CURB CUT n _i PARKING LOTS BMP NUS) OWNER SWEPT. RAINY SEASON(OCT-MA`) _ BMP NBL J OP.R 54,55 ' M /,P S O2 PROPOSED UNDER SIDEWALK DRAIN - PR \ \ - STORM DRAIN SYSTEM STENCILINGAND MAINTAIN LEGIBILITY OF STENCILING AND - ) 3 PROPOSED OVERFLOW RISER STRUCTURE fi SIGNAGE(BMP ELI OWNER SIGNS. MIRY. \ / 1 5 \ 4 PROPOSED STORM DRAIN N TRASH AND WASTE STORAGE AREAS MUST BE \ / / 5 PROPOSED GRAVEL PAD f o INSPECTED TO ENSURE RECEPTACLES ARE NOT PROP.SORETENTION - '•�T 4 \ \ w O O 0 o COLLECTINGSTORMWATER.TRASH WITH UNDERDRAINS _ 3 BMP NI4,51� 6 PROPOSED FUEUNG AREA(DRAINAGE i0 BE DIRECTED - TRASHANDWASTESTORAGEAREA(BMPSB) OWNER WEEKLY - - -- \ \ I TO OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR BEFORE BMP) ENCLOSURE AREAS SHALL BE SWEPT AND PER BIO-2 DETAIL \\ \ CLEANED,GUMPSTERS SHALL BE EMPTED.LIDS LAT:34.094748' E%.DRAINAGE V-GUTTER \ \J 1 MUST BE MAINTAINED CLOSED AT ALL TIMES. LONG:-11 J.593912' ` \ \1 / �I ] PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TANKS IRRIGATON SYSTEMS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ( \ ENSURE PROPER FUNCTIONALItt.TIMERS / �B PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE ti$ EFFICIENT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS&LANDSCAPE MUSTBE INSPECTEDTO AVOID 9 PROPOSED OIL AND WATER SEPARATOR °rz DESIGN(BMD541 OWNER OVERWAIERING AND WATER C'YCLCAND WEEKLY DISCHARGE POINT 12 _ O 0 O DRD UIIATIONSHAURFADJUSIEOSEASONAUFf EY EXISTING 10 PROPOSED HEADWALL CJ E P IANOSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR. BUILDING CJ�o a m C+ TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE 11 PROPOSED CATCH BASIN m LANDSCAPE AREAS 14INCHES BELOW CURB, REMOVED WITHIN THE 12 INCH DEPRESSION E%.R \ - ,O SIDEWAU(OR PAVEMENT BMP EST AND REMOVEDDISPOSED WEQUIRTHEBIOSWALE AND of< ° m _ - i. VARIES 0 w o ITHIN V° --- 12 CONNECT TO EXISTING CATCH BASIN im N w x OWNER WEEKLY \ / REQUIREMENTS. \ ' TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE V PRIES -J ,� o i BIOSWALES IBMP N4) OWNER DISPOSED OF PER LOCALJUNISDICTION WEEKLY W GQ REQUIREMENTS.INSPECT FOR SIGNS Of E%.CB (� e i n( EROSIONORDAMAGETOVEGETATION. - \ \\ N (D ° TRASH,DEBRIS,AND SEDIMENT MUST BE --- Q °= REMOVED WITHIN THE _------------ BASIN AND DISPOSED INSPECT ON AND MAINTENANCE REQUIRED - BIORETENTION BASIN IBMP NT) OWNER OF PER LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. AFTER EVERY RAIN EVENT GREATER THAN 05 $ INCHES.INSPECTIONS SHALL OCCUR MONTHLY INSPECT FOR SIGNS OF EROSION OR DAMAGE 'a P TO ENSURE OPTIMUM PERFORMANCE. TOvEGETAnoN. _ BIO SWALE DETAIL Q o$ FUEL DISPENSING AREASWILL EMEND \ N.T.S. N LL 6.5 FEET(2.0 METERS)FROM THE — 03 CORNER OF EACH FUEL DISPENSER,OR �—_ —__— EX.78" sY THE LENGTH AT WHICH THE HOSE AND �lf Q _> NOZZLE ASSEMBLY MAY BE OPERATED PLUS I FOOT IDS M ETER),WHICHEVER I5 PROPOSED BARRIER FOR DEPTHS OVER E° 18'TO BICREIENTION BOTTOM $ LESS.THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA WILL BE PAVEDWITH PORTIANDCEMENT ADJOINING SITE STRUCTURES PER PLAN Q - CONCRETE(OR EQUIVALENT SMOOTH ADJOINING SIZE STRUCTURES PER PLAN IMPERVIOUS SURFACE).THE FUEL W DISPENSING AREA WILL HAVE AN 2°2 APPROPRPERCENT)IATE SLOPE(2 PERCENT-4 _ 2-4°OF OVERFLOW P} 2-4"OF OVERFLOW °E Ef MULCH DRAIN `! MULCH DRAIN WILLBESEP RATEDPREVE FROM THEDI RAND - H SITE SERA GRADFROMTHEREST OF B`E THE SITE BVA GRADE BREAK THAT '9 m o? PREVENTSRUN-ONOFSTORMWATER.AN OVER HANGING ROOF STRUCTURE OR EILEILEe=ILRy� LI-I= =LE a U CANOPY WILL BE PROVIDED.THE COVER'S ENGINEERED II II-II II II II II II II II ENGINEERED I'III_II II II II-III • J ° SOIL MEDIA SOIL MEDIA -I_'-I_-I_it 'I-_ MINIMUM DIMENSIONS MUST BE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE AREA OF THE AS M 09, III II II ASTU C3 �IH AS TM C33 SAND C33 III to W FUEL DISPENSING AREA IN THE FIRST E 3 3 31 I a SAND, SAND, IIEy N o$ ITEMgBOVE.THECOVERWILLNOT 20-40Y, II III II II II III-III-II-II II 20-40R III-I Why DRAIN ONTO THE FUEL DISPENSING AREA COMPOST I 3113 COMPOST IIEII ° AND THE DOWNSPOUTS WILL BE ROUTED PER WIMP PER WQMP K 2 j Q E TO PREVENT DRAINAGE ACROSS THE REPORT) REPORT) K U h FUELING AREA.THE FUELING AREA WILL O a C1 2 DRAIN TO THE PROJECTS TREATMENT n jk W WEDU o a FUEUNG ARE0.5(S12) OWNER CONTROL BMP(5). ONGOING 6"PERFORATED 6"PERFORATED W d ED ¢W m e WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM PVC PIPE WRAP ENTIRE SYSTEM7 PVC PIPE W U E IN 30 MIL PVC IN 30 MIL PVC CG Uj NON-PERMEABLE UNER AASHTO q57 NON-PERMEABLE LINER AA /57 W a W R o GRAVEL GRAVEL J 4 a W a ° 3"THICK LAYER OF PEA 3"TACK LAYER OF PEA NORTH W W 3 Z U 3.5 GRAVEL GRAVEL n Q:Z U m 0 ?-g N.T.S. BIO-2 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 U N.T.S. N.T.S. Pag p 4O 80 $➢ �� r l�.Cr SHEET NUMBER W MI-,4 1 PROJECT TEAM 8 OWNER/DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES MANDEVILLE 7 65 THE CITY DRIVE SOU1H,SUITE E NO LINDA VISTA AVENUE 200 PASADENA,CA 91105 ORANGE,CA 92868 (714)786-6275 - `_AP 020- 1-17 -021-1 CHASE ORRIS EASIEVALL,LLC suRVEr ZONING: ENE DUSTRIA ° ZO G: IN AL INDU T IAL O II \ \ / APN: 0209=041-01 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE ADKAN ENGINEERS +MEDIUM 8-14 DU AC 240 R879 AIRPORT DRIVE a ° ( / ) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 z (949)330-7562 TO OGRA0PHY 19 PROVIDED ON o AEON EON H \E 125- _ HI / EOH-F-\EOH NINTH STREET \ \ SITED T \ / I SITE ADDRESS: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 --�-- - - - I / ° ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0209-032-35-ONO \(E) DIN LIZED \ - o4I \_______ INTERGE TION / r \ THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES: 2009 SAN BERNARDIN0&RIVERSIDE 1_-- ----�1125�������� 1 COUNTIES PAGE 602 GRID J-3 APN: 0289\054-79 ELA 0 / I ZONINGAAND USE: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1V1 ZONING: MEDIUM =t4 f1t/AC) --- _ II 4)) \ ^J� i I \ FEMA: HE MA FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL NO.06071C8630J. -11 Z`J' r b9 •+1.08 •+24 •+1.1] 1.4 •+1.42 •+1.15 •+0. •-0.12 0. o FLOOD ZONE X AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD FLOOD ZONE A AREA w l 1 f ___ / SUBJECT TO 1 PERCENT-ANNUAL-CHANCE FLOOD EVENT V \\`-- - LEGEND- L =Q< ig + '=f`3`S 1 \\ \ / ° PROPERTY UNE O k W^ +3 •+I. •+1. 1.35 •+1.66-,\1.18 •+.]5 •+0.15 •-.0 1 \ �+ "g \ CENTER LINE "o r\\\ 1 \ I 1 LIMITS OF DISNRBANCE I / \ •+1.6 1 63 \ I \\ \ / 1 77 PROPOSED FILL --------- +\3 p+1 _ - 53, al n2m9 1.74 +.4 •Y.B31 •+0. \ \ 1 1 / \ \ l\/ of I �.t7 PROPOSE CUT 1 II••�•I �� I \ \ �I I ° PN: 0209-054-8 E \ I \ \ I MEDIUM(8-14 U AC) 3 •+1i 6 11165 •+1 I .;II9 s3 a35_+.v _1.86 •+Lo I ESTIMATE EARTWORK QUANTITIES -- _--- CUT: 5,4 7 o z i I FILL: 5,457 CY 09 1•+I 2 l 70 •+2 02 2l •+316 3.03 +.93 +2.49\ •+1.4 \ \ / / 1 I •- ®�n _ J-¢EVEN SigEE � NET: 5,304 CY FlLL Y 1 lao•I \ 6.000 Sf \ ,I/ / 01 I n I �� NOTE: THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE IN PLACE VOLUMES CALCULATED FROM THE EXISTING 1 �' � I I \ \ / I GROUND TO THE PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GROUND IS DEFINED BY THE CONTOURS AND SPOT +.51 +1 8 2 O6 •T 9 •+3.54 •+3.43 .35 •+2.75 •,1 6 I ` \ / I o OR ON THE BASE SURVEY.PROPOSED FINISHED GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE FINAL GRADE AS INDICATED ON \ la THE GRADING PLAN(S). ' \ I - � I \ I 5 THE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES ABOVE ARE FOR PERMIT PURPOSES ONLY THEY HAVE NOT BEEN FACTORED TO ACCOUNT- +.`Jb •+3.]9 •+3.69 +.60 f \ \ / / EXCAVATION OUANOCRE OVER- NCOMPACTIONGES IN LAND CONSTRUCTION UME DUE TO KMETHODS.NOR DO THEY ING, CLEARING AND RCCOUNT FOR THEGEHICKNE55 - o ------- 5�o.d '+2.]2 '+ 'I11 \ / / ^�� OF PAVEMENT SECTIONS,FOOTINGS, SLABS, REUSE OF PULVERIZED MATERIALS THAT WILL UNDERLIE NEW PAVEMENTS, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RELY ON THEIR OWN EARTHWORK ES11MAlE5 FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. - PARCEL 1 I I \ / 1 4 / � o 5 .44 14.0•2 •+294 .3 •+4,05 •+199 •+2. +1 I I I _ k PARCEL MAP 8653 't + o s PMB 90/21-22 z n2a )v ij SITE AREA Y123122 \ Q 1 / ° TOTAL SITE AREA 1.87 ACRES O o wo J u •1. 2111M \ \ ,\ TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.77 ACRES 2 16 u m °a -______ 99 .+ . 291 (��i 3. +3J4 ��x EXISTING IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES E m dye � \ 1 I n eN: 0209-054- EXISTING PERVIOUS 1.78 ACRES 7 •+2.98 •+2.87 •+2 57 -0.85,•-1.15 ` \ \\y/ I j ZONING: APEDIUM(8-14 D/AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS 1.25 ACRES Q o _ PROPOSED PERVIOUS 0.52 ACRES - 1IZZ 1119 REPLACED IMPERVIOUS 0 ACRES 1ieU 4) / -1120 37 •+2.68 •+164 •+2.50 1.58 •+1.1 � ] \ U`\ / I I \ P + + 86 +2 1 •2.1 \`•t0.88 •+0.32 •+0.1 0 \ 1 \ W o. LJL ----------------------- _ PARCEL 1 n PARCEL MAP 1528 \ \ / 0 - PMB 14/561111111111111TTTT7_711111111111 APN: 0209-032-34 ° -ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ 1 / / o AP 0209-05 o \\ \ / / II ZONING: MEDIUM(8 4 DU%A�), $ ry o c DO w o� __ i- \ m z I Z rnm j Q zo _ -- �Q dU O \\ \\ j / I �W WU PARCEL 2 \ \ / / I Z of H z w 'T \ I PARCEL MAP 1528 \ 4 sue. _ W �1n U z `" --'-- PMB 14/56 � I\ `\ \\ / II I W¢W a o APN: 0209-032-37 I \ `1 I I I APN: 209-054-7 NORTH W W 3 Z 0 3= ZONING: GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ 1\ / + M IUM(8-14 U/AC) r Z 1 I .nwrw n om 0 Do y$ -1115- PaGRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 N MwnYAR SHEET NUMBER mo - SEI IYC IQ vs,ft1N aWMtwnµiy INCWAsm=EAAXW?,GWJ-d(,W) r -AT B1 52E ---- IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA WE UTTIZATION MAP FOR TENT TO CE PARCEL MAP NO. 2 164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS • • n600 .. . -• IAx aun'�L - -- - e ••fALAAA4 E } T '• }• f OWNER A w e MR.AND MRS.RICHARD T.MANDEVILLE 500 LINDA VISTA AVENUE .. �,-� 4. • � PASADENA,CA 91105 �•Jr"� •" •! '` Lrrrrn wv APPLICANT S[I/4.SfG Ia 7.IS,ftilF CHASE ORBIS EASTEVAIE,LLC 208 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 •• tl �..r...�.-, .� ' • '_ �) MCWAS was AMC PA47 RV,GW J-J(2009) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 -� •, .J� PH.949-330-]562 __ •• w MAP PREPARER ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL 1- - -01� KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES LAND USE:GENERAL ,- - ZONING:GENERAL INDUSiRIAL4 ZONING:MEDIUM 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 INDUSTRIAL 0.50-O.60 FAR ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL II LEGEND ORANGE,CA 92868 ( ) LAND USE:GENERAL LAND USE:SCHOOLS(FAR 0.10-020) BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 RIGHT-OF-WAY (714) LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0,50-0.60 FAR) INDUSTRIAL 0.50-0.60 FAR �. [ 786-6275 e' Q' �I p PROPERTY LINE SITE ADDRESS R/w - I�j.• \ 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE CENTER LINE RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA 91730 /NTH STREE �D EXISTING STORM DRAIN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS ' _ 9 SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN 0209-032-35-0000 RAW I' a/r; - ZONING:MEDIUM ZONING/LAND USE t LAND USE:MEDIUM FAR 14.0 DU/AC) ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL R ABBREVIATIONS LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL }+ } } ADJACENT LAND USE � 3 AC ACRES NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ~ l PROP. : - - ARM ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER SOUTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL M' PROJECT SIZE ZONING:MEDIUM EAST:MEDIUM(8-14 DU/AC) PARCEL 1 LAND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) R WEST:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL CENTER LINE 68 AC Du Dwfiuwc UNITS UTILITY PURVEYORS WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT BUILDING E%. EXISTING SEWER:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAVALLEY WATER DISTRICT 6 600 S.F. GAS:SOUTHERN CAAUFNIA COMPANY PARCEL MAP 8653 R FAR FLOOR AREA RATIO ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CAMFORNIA EDISON PMB 90 21-22 PARCEL MAP 8653 A TELEPHONE:�•1 R PROPERTY LINE CABLE:CHARTER CABLE 90/21-22 SCHOOL:CUCAMONGA SCHOOL DISTRICT PROP. PROPOSED zorvwc:GENERAL EASEMENT NOTES ¢� R/W RIGHT-OF-WAY 1, EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE UNES AND PARCEL MAP 1528 PROP.BIOREIENTION BASIN INS : - - INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT PMB 14/56 W11H UNDERDRAINS ZONING:MEDIUM SD STORM DRAIN RECORDED JAGE 481],1885 IN BOOK 39 AND USE:MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PROP.RISER 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL MPG: 0209-032-34 P.,.�.P PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED PROP.BIOREIEN TON BASIN ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL Til DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE WITH DROP IN t; LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) C.Alxl 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SE ENT OR UND CONSULTS PROP.R i_�• I 3 NACIDENTALFPURPOSE S IN THE AND THE DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 26.1977 AS BOOK 9164, PAGE 1447 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. R 4. EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL MAP NO.8653 RECORDED OCTOBER 04,1984 l ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF \ � •) A� - - 3 PARCEL MAPS ISTING BUILDING EX.CATCH ZONING:MEDIUM PROJEOT NOTES • •_ - - (TO BASIN LAND u5E MEDIUM(FAR 8.0-14.0 DU/AC) q iHOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN REMAIN - BERNARDINO k RIVERSIDE COUNTIES(PAGE 602 GRID 1-3). EX.CATCH 2. FEMA FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE X AND EX.CATCH BASIN ZONE A.COMMUNITY PANEL N0, BASIN' O60]1C8830J. EX.CATCH R 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS BASIN TOTAL NUMBER OF PARCELS:2 APN:0209-032-26 - - TOTAL SITE ACREAGE:2.3292 ACRES ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ZONING:MEDIUM 4, TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS AND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL PARCEL MAP 1528 LAND USE:ME01111,1(FAR SO 14.0 DU/AC) LEGAL DESCRIPTION (0.50-0.60 FAR) PMB 14/56 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO,8653 AS PER y EA.CATCH /,' J' PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, APN:0209-032-37 I BASIN -- �Lw� _ PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY ZONING: MERAL INDUSTRIAL E%.CATCH - E%.CATCH RECORDS. INDUSTRIAL LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) BASIN] BASIN SITE UTILIZATION MAP L PREPARATION DATE • R/W _ --- NORTH 12/10/2020 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET N BOULEVARD I10 30 660 120 \ 3 R/W \ a \ \ APNPARULL:0209-032-36 E%.CATCH BASIN ZONING:GNERAL INDUSTRIAL _ xHEN PRixTED AT Nu azE - - LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) (26 6Y�a I ZONING:VERY LOW ZONING:C4JERAL INDUSTRIAL E%.CATCH LAND USE:VERY DO 0 W SCALE: /20' W.O. 194121003 LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL(0.50-0.60 FAR) BASIN DATE: O6/2020 �mley»)Horn SITEPaWZ625 MAP SHEET FAR 20-4.0 DU AC DESIGNED: %0 1 '. '� CHECKED: SA OF I SHEETS 765 THE Cltt DRIVE.SUITE NO.ORANGE.CA 92868 PlN CK REF: PHONE:711.11NnN CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA NO. REVISIONS I DATE I BY I FE. WWY.KIMLEY-H 11— Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement LMF Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts Part Number ® 6 CPY-FLAT-C SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ ® 28 CPY-FLAT-C-WH SINGLE 1.000 4520 31 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ % 1 XSPLG-4ME-2 2 @ 90° 1.000 23600 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N 6 XSPLG-4ME-B SINGLE 1.000 17200 184 XSPLG-D-HT-4ME-24L-57K7-UL-BZ-N w/XA-SP2BLS ®> 6 XSPW WALL MOUNT 1.000 4270 31 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ Calculation Summary; 1.00 LLF Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min All Calc Points Fc 1.93 16.5 0.0 N.A. N.A. d H Canopy Fc 21.20 24 14 1.51 1.71 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 D.1� LJ.Go 0.0 0.0 0.0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Paved Parking Fc 4.24 16.5 1.0 4.24 16.50 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHTS AS SHOWN 0.0 0.1 .1 0.1 0.2 0.2 3. 0. 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.IT' 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0!3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 POLES MOUNTED ON 3' BASE ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT REQUIRED::a : 0.1 0.1 .z o. Lc-aME-B FS - o .0 I 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (7) SSS-4-11-17-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ (17' x 4" x 0.125" STEEL SQUARE POLE, TENON MOUNT) MR 20 (6) PD-1 H4BZ SINGLE HORIZONTAL TENON 1@90° 0.1 0.1 .2 0.4 1.1 2.8 5.8 7.9 7.4 .3 9 2.8 1.6 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.3 1.8 1 7 1.8 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (1) PD-2H4(90)BZ DOUBLE HORIZONTAL TENON 2@90° (6) XA-SP2BLS BACKLIGHT SHIELD W 0.1 0.1 .2 0. 1.1 2.7 6.4 5.9 .3 6.5p .2 3 3 3.0 3.4 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.•7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 6 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.4 2.2 3.5 4.7 8 4.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PROPOSED POES MEET 120MPH SUSTAINED WIND LOADS - 159 ' - d H 0.1 0.11 .2 0. 1.1 2.8 3.7 .1 3.5 3 4�® 5. .1 11.1 12.0 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12C Y14gZCZ " 12.1 12.2 12.1 12.2 12.2 11.8 10.5 6.7 3.7 3.2 6�9 6.2 5.0 0.5 0.2 0.� �.� �.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *** CUSTOMER TO VERIFY ORDERING INFORMATION AND CATALOGUE NUMBER PRIOR TO PLACING ORDER *** 1*I 18p 20R1 21 1A 2a 2* 21 21®21 i21 1 21 A lib 21021 21 011 121 Iq 21 201 211 21R1 21 �1 10 1� 1 0 . O 0.1 0.1 .2 0. O ® 13 ® ® ® ® ® 11.7 5.4 4.1 5 7 0.9 .3 0.:, �1cf .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 U 16 ?�i1(32 23 23 240fJ024 24 23 28i� O23 23 �0;�3 23 23 z3006 23 23 23 �U(33 23 23 23�E �20 1 �PLG-4��LJJ LLJJw u v UU LLJJ 9 16 20 22 23 23 24 24 23 23 23 23°'``' 3 3-23 23 2 23 23 23 23 3 23 23 23 2323 23 23 23 20 1 MH:20 0.1 0.1 .2 0.9 1� 1. 2.1 2.7 .7J6. ® 91 ® ® 91 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® 12.0 5.9 4.6 6h6 9.6 5.6 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 15 1=0 21 21 21 Z1 20 20 20 2020 0 20 20 L�20 20 20 20 n 20 20 20 2=0 20 20 20 13 170.1 0.1 .2 1. 2.6 2.7 .4 3.9 3.96. 10.2 13.2 13.0 12.0 11.5 11.3 1 L.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 11.1 11.2 2 11.0 10.1 7.4 6.2 6.4 9.7 8.1 9 ,5.8 10Q4. 70.1 8 A 0.0 (� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 .3 5.0 6.0 5.9 5.2 5.0 6.6 6.5 8.5 8.7 10.0 9.4 5.9 4.3 3.7 3.5 3 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.4 .5 3.5 3.6 3.8 5.6 9.9 9.1 9.2 3.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0 0. 0�0 0.0 0.0 1 I ► 12 ► 1 I 10 I 0.1 0.2 .5 4.5 6.6 7.9 4.4 5.3 9.0 12.1 12 3 14.2 7-1'2 :9 2.5 1.7 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 .3 2.2 3.1 4.1 7 5 6.4 1.7 0.4 0.1 0.1 .4 o 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.1 0.2 D.7 5 A 7 9 5.1 6.0 11.0 11.6 14.2 6.5�12.3 6 8 4.0 .2 1.3 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.2 1. 1 2 1.2 .'3- 1 74 2.8 3. 5 2G- E-B1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0I.0 0.0 0.0 M G-4 -B J N NVA �•VV/ MH: 0 • Q f O 0.1 0.2 .6 5.0 4.6 5.7 10.8 10.6 L -q 1�. Nl .8 6 5 3.8 .1 1.1 1.0 1.9 3.2 3. 3. 3 7 3.5 .5 2.1 7 2. 3. 7 4 4.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0 0 0.� 0.0 0.0 0.0 n i n n ,n n n n CK 00 N N o ei (.TI 0.1 0.2 .3 5.6 6, ;4 5.3 4.3 6. 8.2 10.0 9.7 -1O.6 5.3 3.8 2.3 0 1.0 0 1.3 5. 0 05 1 01.6 0 2.0 3.80 5.2 05.4 5.2 - 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 r 0-0 .0 0.0 0.0 :. � M 0.1 0.2 10521 3.5 4 .6 4.8 3.8 8 8.0 6.5 5.7 4.2 - CPY-FLAT-C 0.7 1.3 2.0 1.9 2.1 1.8 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 MH:12 0.1 �2 0.3 3.7 6.2 5.7 5.5 3 1 ► n 1 3.0 �3.� 4.8� ► 1 1 1 2 ► 0.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 \0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 / l� `t G 12 . �34 . 4 ' 22 . 6 ' Q.1 0.2 0.4 3.4 6.2 7 9 4.5 2.8 2.0 1 4 1.4 1.5 2.9 4.7 1. 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 rn m � � 0.1 0.2 0.6 4.5� 8.3 6.5 ,��/}/,�.5 .8 2 2 1.4 1.0 0.9 1.0 2.7 4.2 M"PW O O O m 2.0 1.3oO o 0 0.2 0 0. 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 XS 4ME-B V �v XSPW �J T MH:11 �. 0.2/ 0.5 3.9 8 4 7.2 4.3 3.0 4 1.0 0.7 �0.9 2. 2 n 111 7 3.2 1.5 3 0. oI 0.1 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.b 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 F-A 0.1 0.2 0.3 31 6 W 7.4 5.4 3.3 .4 1.� 1.1 0.9 �0.9 2.l y 3.3 XSPW 3.4 1.50 0.2 0 0.1 0 0.0 025 ►0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 / CD MH.11 KD 1 � - 2 2.3 4 2 5 zl. r 1 2. 9 r 9 3 v �� 3:� v � 0 5. �.7 3.1 1.6 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.2 3.9 4.6 3.9 3.7 3 3.7 2.2 1.1 1.6 �98�3.1 2.7 3.0 `2.9 3_.1 _ 2.9 3.1 2.8 3.2 2.9 2.8 .9 ' 2.7 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.�J 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BOM : Complete Part Description 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 1.4 3.1 6.9 6.1 5.5 6 x7HC51.4 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.2 1.4 1. 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.1 0.7 0.3 Oyu 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 rZ - (LOn� (�1 Q 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.2 3.1 5 9 8.2 7.6 6 7 5.6 2.3 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.'3' 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28 CPY250 B DM-F-C-UL-WH-57K-HZ H 06 CPY250-B-DM-F-C-UL-BZ-57K-HZ 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.8 6.0 5.2 SPL5G4ME-B4 5.6 2.0 0.8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 XSPLG D-HT-4ME-24L-57K-UL-BZ-N >0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.2 W0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 dd 07 SSS-4-11 -17-CW-BS-OT-N-BZ `'z 06 PD-1 H4(90)BZ \ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0. 0.3 0. 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0� 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01 -2 4 90 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 A 0 o 1-1*01 B AO LO*Do*o �0 TEN 0�0 C 0.0 0.0 0�0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 06 XSPW-B-WM-3ME-4L-57K-UL-BZ U `L 06 XA-SP2BLS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.� O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 MPH 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Ll t- T E� 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. �- �D- -T 0 off- �0 0.0 try -0.0-0.0 . 0.0 - 0.00.0-0.0 .e -0.0 0.0 �� .� �.0 �-0�-0-A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 111.19 0.0 0.0 0.C Illumination results shown on this lighting design CREE are based Lighting used inco junco n with lumin _ _ _ yout By: ' _® LIGHTING tCree esteed to r procedures useddctedunionaboraminaire Project Name : 7- Eleven #1046125 Archibald + 9th Rancho Cucamonga, CA EX Scale 1 = 20 test procedures conducted under laboratory conditions. Actual project conditions differing o I l i n W i t h e row from these design parameters may affect field INC. results.The customer is responsible for A COMPANY 0 F IDEAL INDUSTRIES, ^ verifying dimensional accuracy along with 0 `+0 O compliance with any applicable electrical, SR-42253 Footcandles calculated at grade Filename: 71 1 -20061 1 RCCACW.AG Date:6/11/2020 9201 Washington Ave,Racine,WI 53406 https://creelighting.com-(800)236-6800 l compliance energy code. Page 586 Page 678 —�EOH EOH — 9TH STREET — — m m O — EXISTING FL' Lu U) W EXISTING POWER EXISTING R/W POLE (TYP) J I I H of PROJECT SITE 0 w Q D Ill z w = Q I �---EXISTING OVERHEAD w m UTILITY (TYP) > I 0 U Q rn m Z of F— I (n W NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 40 80 160 Kimley*Horn Page 587 Page679 IN THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATWE PARCEL MAP NO® 20164 PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 8653 AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS APN:0209-021-17 APN:0209-021-16 I \ \ I ♦ NEwwI ZONING:INDUSTRIAL ZONING:INDUSTRIAL II I \ \ I \ APN:0209-041-01 eI4� ZONING:MEDIUM NINTH STREET I \\ v OWNER IC N89W'00"W n R /`1� IN 500 UNDA META AVENU E.MANOEVILLE ——1125 PASADENA,CA 91105 APN:0209-054-79 -- " S8s'S0'00'E 2t9.47' //ZS \ \I j / ZONING:MEDIUM APPLICANT 1 1 _II?9\ \ / SEI I SfC Iq T.IS,ft7W CHASE ORRIS EASTEVALE,LLC Ex-R/Y/ 208 NEWPORAT CENTER DRIVE SUITE 240 544tl8'304E 27.95' / INOVAS&i0S ddx PACT 601, J-J(xtl9) NEWPORT BEACH,CA 92660 1 T \ 1 PH.949-330-7562 p3- I I vv iv1 MAP PREPARER KINNEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 765 THE CITY DRIVE SOUTH,SUITE 200 ORANGE,CA 92868 'III✓/ ` 1 \ / I BRIAN GILLIS R.C.E.63021 1122, I APN:0209-054-80 PARCEL 1 _ \` / b14)7a6-627s ZONING:MEDIUM I 1.68 AC - W i /�v 1 TOPOGRAPHY 1 ` `.� I / I ADKAN ENGINEERS 6879 AIRPORT DRIVE Ex. RIVERSIDE,CA 92504 PROPOSED / / Ex' NORMERLY TOPOGRAPHY PROVIDED ON 08/23/2019 8U ING ,I / SOUTHERLY " I Q\ R/w R/W SITE ADDRESS VARIES 44.96'1 8678(29') (37') RANCHO CUCAMONGA,AVENUEBALD AMON ACA 917M V II v / 11 (I. 1D') (Iv') (25') _ (12') ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS PARCEL 1 020s-032-35-0000 PARCEL MAP 8653 n I \` m I S 1 \ o E%IST.AC 1 ZONING/LAND USE PMB 90/21-22 a \ ° '\ "� PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING ZONING:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL ——1120-— z 3 \ w1 /1\, EX.CURB &GCUIUIRRB SIDEWALK LAND USE:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \\ &G ER P EX.R PARCEL MAPS65S - \\ \ / 1 \ ADJACENT LAND USE / 1 APN:0209-054-82 �\F� \'S NORTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL i PMB 90/21-22 \\-R/W \ \\ \P / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM 845E COURSE �COMpgC1ED SUB-GRADE SO UTH:GENERAL INDUSTRIAL \ \ \ WEST:GENERAEA T.MEDIUM L a-14 INDUSTRIALLc) ZONING:INDUSTRIAL \ / 1 NINTH STREET NOT TO SCALE UTILITY PURVEYORS li \ / /(,1 WATER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT �\ \ / /'I EN Ex. SEWER:CUCAMONGA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT _ '' / WESTERLY EASTERLY GAS:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY yV���I R/W ELECTRIC:SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON -- PROP.It J / I R/W (VARIES 100'-104'2) TELEPHONE:AT&T o N89'49'29'W 236.18' - / (VARIES 55'-59'3) (44.96'J CABLE:CHARTER CABLE SCHOOL:CHARTER CUCAMONGACAB SCHOOL DISTRICT -_` (VARIES) (VARIES 4L5'-45.5'E) (32') (1296') EASEMENT NOTES PARCEL 2 1 3 U / / 1� (VARIES 1. EASEMENT FOR WATER PIPE LINES AND n -------3 5 RECORDEDINCIDENTAL JANUARyES,N eas NOBOOKN 39 PARCELI -0.65 AC o 6.5'-]4 E%IST.AC 1 ryy' w Q � I I OF DEEDS,PAGE 484. PARCELMAP 1528--- rn / PAVEMENT E%.MEANDERING 2. EASEMENT FOR PIPE LINES AND INCIDENTAL EM.SIDEW Ex.CURB SIDEWALK PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT RECORDED E%.CURB PMB 14/56 0 \ / &CUTER &GUHR DECEMBER 02,1892 IN BOOK 9164,PAGE \m 144E E OFFICIAL DERGROU APN:0209-032-34 �3 EASEMENT FOR UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND ZONING:INDUSTRIAL �/ / APN:0209-054-78 \BASE COURSE INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE DOCUMENT EXISTING I COMPACTED SUB-GRADE RECORDED APRIL 26,1977 AS BOOK 9164, BUILDING I/ / 1 ZONING:MEDIUM ------ z (TO REMAIN) PAGE 144E of OFFICIAL D RECORDS. Ex.R z I\ / I ARCH NOT TO AVENUE EASEMENT SHOWN OR DEDICATED ON PARCEL \ / NOi i0 SCALE MAP N0.8653 RECORDED OCTOBED 04,1984 1 I 4 1 1 I I \ 1 / ON FILE IN BOOK 90,PAGE 21 AND 22 OF --- N89'S0'00'W 235.06'------' r \ \ / II PARCEL MAPS PARCEL 2 I 1 \ \\ / jll` PROJECT NOTES PARCEL MAP 1528 \\ \\ I 11 1. THOMAS BROS.COORDINATES:2009 SAN - PMB 14/56 _ /!\ \ \4 / 1 BERNARDINO&RIVERSIDE COUNTED(PAGE _--- ---_--------------- 602 GRID J-3. APN:0209-032-37 \\ \\ I 2. FEN FLOOD MAPPED FLOOD ZONE%AND ZONE ZONE A,COMMUNITY PANEL N0. ZONING: INDUSTRIAL I \ \ / 06071C8630J. \ / III 3. TOPOGRAPHY SOURCE:ADKAN ENGINEERS TOTAL F PARCELS / III TOTAL SITEBER ACREAGE:232932ACRES 4. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDINGS:2 BUILDINGS LEGAL DES CRIPTION APN:ZONING: MEDIUM PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 40.8653 AS PER ZONING:MEDIUM NORTH PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 90 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 21 AND 22,SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY RECORDS. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET MAP PREPARATION DATE 0 20 40 80 5/5/2020 MAP REVISION DATE SCALE: 1"=40' O. 1941210DS DATE: 2020 DDESIGNED:: xo �mley»)Horn TENTATI\f?c-fgec@88AAP 20164 CHECKED: ESA OF I SHEETS 7fi3 TIE CITY DRIVE SUITE 200,ORANGE,CA 91Bfi0 Pw cK REF: HExe n4-w9-1wo CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA no. REVISIONS DATE BY F.B. WAW.KIMIEY-HORN.COM DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA Orbis Rancho Partners LLC ("Owner") owns an approximately 2.33 acre property located at 8768 Archibald Avenue immediately south of 9th Street in the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") ("Site"). While a majority of the Site is currently vacant, approximately 25% of the Site is improved with a commercial building and its associated parking. At this time, the Owner wishes to construct a "Lab Store" concept 7-Eleven convenience store of 4,595 square feet, a 2,005 square foot co- branded quick service restaurant, and 16 fueling stations ("Project"). The co- branded quick service restaurant will be occupied by Laredo Taco and situated in the same building as the 7- Eleven. Access to the Project will be provided on 9th Street via a full access driveway and on Archibald Avenue with right-in/right-out access only. The Project is part of a new concept that 7-Eleven deems the "Lab Store" and one of less than a handful of other Lab Stores where customers can try and buy the latest innovations in a revolutionary store format. The Lab Store concept evolved from the reality that customers demand more than just bread and milk from convenience retailing. The Lab Store will provide organic and healthy food options that differ from the traditional convenience store customer experience._The store will provide a new customer experience with patio and inside dining areas that offer made-to-order smoothies, agua frescas, street tacos on handmade tortillas, and baked-in-store cookies and croissants. Many of the new items in the Lab Store will be offered on a limited-time basis with new offerings on a routine basis. The innovative concept will be customer-focused by exploring new ideas that are currently not available in the current market. The Lab Store and restaurant will provide residents and visitors an additional option for shopping and dining in the south west area of the City were services are currently limited. In short, the Lab Store is a place for customers to taste and buy new food and beverage items. The 2,005 square foot quick service restaurant, Laredo Taco Company, is famous in South Texas for its handmade tortillas, barbacoa, carne guisada and fresh salsa bar. All of which, are prepared onsite and made to order. The Project will create approximately 21 new jobs, which are allocated between 15 jobs and 6 jobs for the Lab Store and the Laredo Taco, respectively. The Project proposes enhanced architectural detailing that is inspired by modern and mid- century modern architecture that mimics details of this style including a butterfly roof design on the gas canopy and angled roof design on the convenience store/restaurant building, use of concrete and natural materials, placement of windows, steel work, and covered patio canopy. The City recognizes in the General Plan, that the Southwest Focus Area is isolated from commercial and retail uses such as restaurants, grocery stores, etc. The Project, which is one block north of the SW focus area, provides for indoor and outdoor dining, access to healthy food options as well as convenience items, and fuel in an innovative experience and design setting, which will positively contribute to an area of the City that is currently lacking such amenities. The Project is located at the corner of Archibald Avenue and E 9th Street within a 940359 Exhibit C Pag66 3 8 commercial/industrial land use area and will not impact residential uses. The Project is within a 10-15 walking distance of a large number of residential neighborhoods and businesses in the area. Given that the Project qualifies for a Class 32 "Infill" Categorical Exemption (among other exemptions), it is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. Pursuant to the City's development code and land use regulations, the Project is consistent with the existing zoning and qualifies as a permitted use subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Additionally, because the existing commercial building will remain in place, the entitlements will include a parcel map to create two separate legal parcels for the Project and the existing commercial building and its associated parking, independently. In the current retail market, customers have come to expect the ability to purchase alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores and quick service restaurants. Accordingly, the Project will require both a Type 20- Off-Sale Beer& Wine license and a Type 41 - On-Sale Beer& Wine—Eating Places license for onsite consumption of beer and wine at Laredo Taco from the Alcoholic Beverage Control and a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination from the City. A letter of Justification to support the PCN has been submitted with the application. This Project supports the goals and policies of the General Plan (LU-3.7, Goal LU-6, LU-9.1, and LU-9.4) and the City Council Goal #4 to attract new businesses to increase ongoing net revenues for the City. 0245-000-- 940359. Page �{ •}_tip ,,� '1 ryf�T i ce x.`WW . � � .°�` Y •�.' .y .1••I • -ti-i 1 �~ c i�,..�, t - J. ••.�,� .ref :. - . BRAND GUIDELINES _ EST. 2017 � ,�,i �1'�e��`'.X��f�-�* � �`h% ,,*4; ' r' s �'r.�' �. +f"' ti„'�7 i s.Y �r•.� r i .� ., '•+� r ' h•7 ( •F � i,D f rr by,�+�r! w r to '�.r./f�' y 'A.�xnti �,•;`.�`�>t�, '� c4' r , 5a t, Page 683 �=_;�yfiY�{ Y ••`i r e��11�,}'�� .t%�,'.4r�.y� R`• c•*.1 � �' r �'�j ,� 1 ��l i i .dY. �l.Y 1 I � sS-� W S O � 0 a w o co m • �# � S '9 I Y G m x n'1 i r m W W N N di O fO O 1 i m f i I o I Page 684 w Momf _ x , Af � . R t Welcome to Laredo Taco Company.Where authentic Tex-Mex tacos reign supreme. £.: • WE LOVE TACOS. 4 Tacos are why we get up at 5 a.m.and crack eggs one at a time,make our salsa i' fresh daily,and roll out and cook every tortilla by hand.It's not the easiest way, but it's definitely the right way. As we grow Laredo Taco Company,we want every team member—from cooks to cashiers,buyers to suppliers,and every vendor in between—to be able 10 present our brand to our customers in a way that makes it stronger This manifesto w.. is our way of making sure that each of our team members understands WHY we 1 do what we do and HOW to implement their part of the brand flawlessly.You make the brand come alive.You translate the brand lone to the everyday customer experience.You help build a brand that inspires customer loyalty and makes r competitors envious.What you do MATTERS. Be confident and proud to take your part of the branding plan and run with it— h all the way to taco supremacy.Let's gel started... , aK ' yd 1 5 { w w ED * M 11 WHE RE IT ,A.LL E A.N " Our food is the real deal.We were born on the border,a place known y for its unique blend of Mexican and American cultures and traditions. We love and respect the unique cooking and way of living that defines South Texas,and that shows in everything we make-from tacos to .� enchiladas to barbacoa. Our tacos is where it all comes together-border-style flavors,spices and fresh ingredients wrapped in a one-of-a-kind,authentic tortilla.From the y beginning,it's been our insistence 10 use fresh ingredients served in hot, handmade tortillas that really make our tacos exceptional.The smell of fresh dough and that hot-off-the-grill taste and texture cannot be imitated. All of this sets Laredo Taco Company apart from the competition.But why bother with the extra time and effort to do it right?It's all about respect-- _ for our food.and for the customers who count on us. 6 - J CD Av `f CD MA, :D ,E '% cc 4 / R ESPECT 9 - �� - THE T ® � Lately it seems like everyone is making tacos.They've officially gone mainstream.The problem is that Soo many of these new taco places are getting it wrong.Settling for bland recipes or lower quality ingredients. * / Peddling gummy tortillas out of a bag.They are disrespecting the taco. That's where we come in.At Laredo Taco Company,we're on a mission to preserve the AUTHENTIC Tex-Mex style food we—and our customers— _ know and love. i At Laredo Taco Company,we respect the taco. What exactly do we mean?Respecting the taco is about being true to our 1 toots of passion,authenticity and simplicity.To understand how these things — come together in our branding,let's take a look at our messaging strategy. All` + / A0 CD w a � OUR PLATFORM a This helps us stay on track with our message.It outlines some critical promises that we make to each other 0- and to our customers. OUR PURPOSE:At Laredo Taco Company,we exist to respect the taco. OUR OUR POSITION:Our hard-working hungry customers expect the real deal. They don't compromise and neither do we.The taste can't be imitated. MSSAGEOUR PROMISE:Real Tex-Mex isn't expensive or'innovative;'but it does require a lot of love and a home E cook's touch to get it right.We'll never skimp on ingredients or portions and we'll always make our tortillas from scratch.because no matter what anyone puts in a taco.if it's not wrapped In a hot,handmade tortilla, it's not the real deal. Whenever we talk about Laredo Taco Company we want to convey: OUR PILLARS:Our brand stands on three pillars that underly everything we do: OUR PASSION FOR THE TEX-MEX STYLE OF TACOS FOR WHICH WE ARE FAMOUS. This starts mth our people.We focus on employees doing what they love-making tortillas PRIDE We love taco,Sowemeke We wr wallyWeandepp,eo" Weaheeelheleve.C°okmglorpe°plamekn .wed°Ihem nghk evny I,me_ customers Thep..Iwey—the ge u.happy Saemg lhem espy ew food makes a by hand.cooking great recipes from scratch,and serving hungry people with a smile. THAT PROTECTS h'ease —1p,.& eadtheywe,khe,d..ewelh^kmey reenyheppyWemhngthemge1—hu^g,y1. dese,ve°w very bell. happy make us en900 OUR COMMITMENT TO DOING THINGS RIGHT. ` ■i/9 B.S. We don'I cut comae r y� yuu a, W. leis elara omm L - There are shortcuts.6u1 we don't take them.We let people know that the way we make our 1N�U '^p'^s°^p°r s" 9°° R�° �101 eve de ew�•e^.>nd w�.me.l food is not the easiest way,or the cheapest,or the fastest.But it's the only way to deliver MEAN WHAT WE SAY the authentic-tasting taco our customers love. ' - r Hera We sl'eeur • axl In our various creative executions you'll notice several things we highlight to demonstrate '-anr _.^et dam eo"a"�'<.y°�e.pe°I is [4VE ARE THE - m.d.1—h e^d heed-i.t �dOy. Tee-k&a lace. our passion and commitment to authentic tacos: REAL DEAL • Fresh ingredients O�,° „aa peppery a,ewl by mend egg.endnack lhem u^e et Wema4--.1as b°maaamh har.+eel 1.-46 beggeJ ikme,e aaymorrrng N°set.hne! • Tortillas being made by hand • Happy people enjoying cur food(some serving it,some eating it) Whenever we talk about something in one of these"pillars;we're giving our customers reasons to believe in our We keep our promotions fresh and exciting so that our customers always stay engaged brand.And setting ourselves apart from competitors.These details are the proof that we mean what we say.And and satisfied! each.no matter how small.points us back to our purpose... RESPECTING THE TACO w CO rn CO - 01 GLIN At Laredo Taco Company,we want to remind peopte that,unlike many places out there, we go the extra mile to make tacos the right way-the authentic South Texas way.In other words,our tacos are Made Right Here. This means two things: Rrst,MADE RIGHT means we don't compromise,skimp,or cut corners. Second,HERE means Laredo Taco Company is the place you can count on authentic ,TjA 1 I Tex-Mex food.HERE also means made fresh-we build your taco to order right in front of you.It's made with key ingredients like tortillas and salsas made fresh in store-not Fm 1 I t shipped in from some far-oft food service factory. t _ YVhen you combine those two ideas,consumers get a one-of-a-kind experience.It's a strong statement that communicates both:Made Right Here,and Made Right,Here. In Spanish,our tagline is"Hecho aquf,Para ti",which in English means'made right here,for you".The double meaning that is found in the English version doesn't translate well into Spanish;however,by adding"for you",we infuse the tagline with warmth and a sense of connection to our audience. 13 Not only does our brand have a distinctive message,it has a distinctive personality.Think of it as the"voice"we use when [D speaking to anyone about Laredo Taco Company. It's important we keep this voice consistent across every platform and in every d execution.It's how our customers,and the public in general,get to know us.If done well,it's one of the most powerful ways to build trust and loyalty in our brand. HERE'S HOW LAREDO TACO COMPANY"SPEAKS"TO PEOPLE: + ERSONALITY RESPECT 8 KEEPING IT REAL Not only are we the real deal when it comes to food,we also keep it real with the language we use.Communicating in a simple. straightforward and truthful way demonstrates our respect for our customers and our food. DRAWING CONTRASTS We educate,but not in a preachy or snarky way.We simply share our experiences,passions and insights about making great tacos. We are never critical or negative of customers or competitors and don't draw attention to competitors to eievale ourselves.Though we're proud of what we do,we're not the kind to brag about it. EP HAYING FUN Let's face it,tacos are FUN.So we keep things upbeat—high energy and positive.We have fun,without trying too hard to be funny.We're not overtly silly,juvenile or offensive in our humor. Our language is playful,clever and entertaining.Being a little clever is how we keep people smiling and engaged with our brand. LAO TAKING PRIDE IN WHAT WE 00 We're proud of our food,but we show that pride through our passion for what we do..We are enthusiastic and humble,never arrogant or boastful. FOCUS ON THE CUSTOMER We're focused on the custorner experience and their satisfaction ..not ourselves.Even when we show employees talking about our food.they're talking about how and why they love making hungry people happy. Kl 15 TONE & PERSONALITY RADIO • [0')D •• t1) Staying On Tone 1M Maintaining the right tone across everything we any language you may be part of developing.If ANNCR: At Laredo Taco Company we don't just like locos,we love locos. do is so important,we've put together a handy anything feels too far off center,it probably needs We love the way they taste.We love the way they smelt. guide to help us stay on track.Use it to evaluate to be reworked to stay true to our brand voice. We love the way grown men gel a little tear in their eye after that first bite.[Yeah,we noticed.] We're pretty sure chorixo has healing powers. We put salsa on everything. i We think of"Taco Tuesday"as 6 days short of a really good idea. y� WE ARE.... �1 N ,,. And we know that any day that starts with a hot,handmade tortilla can't be all that bad Committed to doing it right RESPECT Sorr a/S rlou At Laredo Taco Company we do what we do for the love of tacos.Because we know you love tacos,too.That's why we make our handmade tacos to order.Hat tortillas fresh in store every Enthusiastic/Humble PRIDE Arrogant/Boa day.And hungry taco lovers everywhere,really,really happy.Laredo Taco Company. Clever/Insightful HUMOR S'rarky/sareas Made right here.Only at Stripes. High-Energy/Posilive FUN Customer-focused FOCUS on,mr.9 OOH Informational/Educational CONTRAST 1Ncgat` Made Right Here/Hecho Aqui Para Ti For the Love of Tacos/Por El Amor A Los Tacas Tortilla Machine/Buenos Dias Con Tortillas Here's how our brand tone and personality come to life in some examples of our work: TV Xi �. MADE MUSIC: Energetic modern Latin crack a 111 a - �, CC OPEN ON AN LAREDO TACO COMPANY EMPLOYEE MAKNG TORTILLAS. VO: At Laredo Taco Company,we proudly make fresh tortillas by hand... ?04rHERE r� CUT TO A SHOT OF THE EMPLOYEE MAKING A TACO. LAREDO TACO VO: Why do we do it? U' CUT TO THE CUSTOMER TAKING A 91TE,SMILING WITH sATtSFACTK)N. VO: For the love of tacos. DIGITAL CUT TO LAREDO TACO COMPANY ART CARD- Engaging and playfl:l in tcnc. VO: Laredo Taco Company.Made right here.Only at Stripes. no ► DO ► Of I t4 tl r TILT THE YOU'VE CATCH SCREEN TO EARNED ALLTHE MOVE THE TWOTAC05 INGREDIENTS *TORTILLA-*I`16'� FOR THE - PRICEq/ONE LLUracn Un JAco frnc0 URsACO 17 ' + r, c v m Z m 1, Page 699 Loco USAGE CD 0) to PRIMARY LOGO SECONDARY LOGO The handcrafted aesthetic of the primary logo reflects the authenticity behind the Laredo Taco Company brand. The secondary logo continues to reflect the authenticity behind the Laredo Taco Company brand as it maintains Details of this aesthetic are rooted in the antiquated art of woodtype printing,with typical characteristics of the handcrafted aesthetic with the addition of a green square or rectangle behind the logo.The characteristics letters of different sizes and varying baselines.The lines of type are slightly tilted and the texture in the logo of different sized letters,varying baselines with type slightly tilted remain,as well as the texture in the logo. is from an imperfect ink transfer to paper.Ultimately these subtle trails convey authenticity. The green background is an option for busier backgrounds in which the primary logo wouldn't show well. I PRIMARY LOGO I SECONDARY LOGO k` Unconlained Colored Vertical Contained Colored Vertical The primary logo for Laredo Taco Company,is the on This logo should be considered first when choosing a contained colored vertical version.This is the logo seen L secondary loge.A version of this logo is seen on pole an the front of the stores and in packaging.This ioga signs and ads with busy backgrounds. lives on Ikghler backgmunds and should be the logo ftrsl LA Im 0 referenced when using logos. TAC O C 0 M pno A NY. Akt' E ACO �,"REDO TACO TACO LAREBOTATCOMPANY. C O M P_A.N Y. _ —.M'- 2 ALTERNATE PRIMARY LOGO 3 ALTERNATE PRIMARY LOGO 2 ALTERNATE SECONDARY LOGO 3 ALTERNATE SECONDARY LOGO Unconlained Colored Square Uncontained Colored Horizontal Contained Colored Square Contained Colored Horizontal Th.i en sAci ate for the primary logo.It has a This is the horizontal alternate for the primary Whm choosing a second.y logo,this logo can be This is the horizontal alternate for the secondary slightly smaller star that sits closer to the type,as logo.When the environments the logo lives in is considered if real estate for the logo is limited or logo.When the background of the logo is busy well as slightly tighter fearing to overall making not conducive for a vertical or square logo,this square in nature.Some layouts may require a shorter and nal conducive for a vertical or square fog', the logo more square.If vortical space is restrictive, logo should used.This logo still lives an lighter logo.The pole sign is a great ezamplo of this usage. this toga slwukd used.This logo still lives on fighter this logo is an option.This logo still lives on lighter backgrounds. backgrounds. backgrounds. 20 21 LOGO USAGE a CD fy 1) co GRAYSCALE PRIMARY LOGO GRAYSCALE SECONDARY LOGO CL All of the traits seen in the color version are the same in the grayscale version of the logo.We still have two All of the traits seen in the color version are the same in the grayscale version of the logo.We still have two tones in the grayscale version with gray and black.This version of the logo is fine to use on Xerox copies,fax tones in the grayscale version with gray and black and use white as well.This version of the logo is fine to use machines,and any publication that only prints in black.When printed in one color black,the gray areas will in the same places as the Grayscale Primary logo,but when used with grayscale backgrounds,this would be a appear as a dot pattern,a tint of black. better option to provide better clarity. 1 PRIMARY LOGO l SECONDARY LOGO Uncontained Grayscale Vertical Contained Black&White Vertical The primary grayscale logo tar Laredo Taco Company This fog.should be eonsidered first when choosing is the unconlained colored vertical version This logo a secondary grayscale logo. lives on fighter backgrounds and shouW be the logo first referenced when using grayscale logos. LAREDO LAREDO TACO TACO COMPANY- C o M P LAREDO TACO LAREDOTAcoAco LAREDOTAco C C M PA NY corn PA NY. C O M P A N Y. C O M P A N Y ; 2 ALTERNATE PRIMARY LOGO 3 ALTERNATE PRIMARY LOGO p ALTERNATE SECONDARY LOGO 3 ALTERNATE SECONDARY LOGO Uncontained Grayscale Square Uncontained Grayscale Horizontal Contained Grayscale Square Contained Grayscale Horizontal This is an attemeie for the primary grayscale Pogo.It This is iheharitonlal alternate for the primary grayscale When choosing a secondary grayscale logo,IWs This is the horizontal alternate for the secondary has a slightly smaller star that sits closer to the type, logo.Wt—iheeevtr..mentr.ihet.g.It..in is not logo can be considered if real estate for the logo is grayscale logo.When the background of the logo as well as slightly ti hter leading to oveiag maki coml-i a for a vertical or equarc logo,ilia log.•h..W limited ors square in nature.Some layouts may require is bus d not conducive for a vertical or square 9 Y g 9 ve used.This logost,11 Wes.nitghterb lig....s q Y Y 9 busy the logo more square.fi vertical space is restrictive, a shorter logo. logo,this logo should used.This logo still lives on this logo is an option.This logo still lives.a lighW lighter backgrounds. backgrounds. 22 23 LOGO USAGE CD lv CIO WHITE (ONE COLOR) PRIMARY LOGO BLACK (ONE COLOR)LOGO This version of the logo is for times when a one color logo is needed on a dark background.It is a little more This version of the logo is for times when a one color logo is needed on a light background.Black is the color limited;where the star overlaps the letters it blends together instead of being soperated by tone or color.It will that is printed here,so likely usage will be confined to grayscale applications.Oiherwise the color version still be useful for one color applications when a grayscale logo doesn't work as well. of this should be used.The black box offers plenty of contrast on lighter backgrounds.This is the least used version of the logo. I PRIMARY LOGO Uncontained One Color Vertical This is the pimary one rotor logo for Laredo Taco Company.This logo Was on dark backgrounds and should be the logo fmtieferencel when usingone 1 SECONDARY LOGO color logos. Contained Black&While Vertical This logo should be considered first when choosing l I I a secondary one color logo,it should be used on lighter grayscale I grayscale backgrounds. C O M 2 ALTERNATE SECONDARY LOGO Contained Grayscale Square p ALTERNATE PRIMARY LOGO 3 ALTERNATE PRIMARY E0G0 one coon log*.When el the bateforihe of *AREDO Uncontained One Color Square Unconlained One Color Horizontal is busyon no.When elve for of or is busy and not conducive for a vedical or square This is an alienate for the pimary one color logo for This is the horizontal allernate for the Primary one logo,this logo should used.This logo lives on lighter Laredo Taco Company,it has a slightly smaller slm color logo.When the environment.the logo lives backgrounds. that sits dower to the type,as whit as slightly ughler in is not conducive for a velicu or square logo, leading to overall making the logo more square.H Ihis logo should used This Pogo lives on darker vertical space is resldctive,this logo is an option. backgrounds. This logo lives on darker backgrounds. 24 25 LOGO USAGE CD tm ca DO NOT DO THESE THINGS WITH THE LOGO These are some simple rules to keep us on the path of consistency when considering how we use our logo. There may be other situations not covered here,but these are a few examples where we show inconsistency. 1L1Ro Vii 00 TFA A TAC �G-Q�•M:P .[Yii�A � 1 PRIMARY LOGO 2 PRIMARY LOGO 5 PRIMARY LOGO G PRIMARY LOGO No stretching of logo No changing colors of logo Tilting of logo Adjustments to logo Stretching the logo to fit a specific Changing the colour of the logo to Tilting the logo should be avoided In The Laredo Taca Company logo is space does not look greal.Please just match a background adds wnfusion typical layouts.Ioslances of suckers oc designed with imperfections,bouncing reduce logo praporti.mdly rather than to the brand.Use a secondary logo other nafwally-applied devices may baselines,overlapping elements,and put vertically or horizontally,or use a instead if more caior separation is ignore this,and that's ok,given that characters that are slightly different horizontal logo instead. needed from background they are more organic applications. sizes.This is intentional end adds to the feel of authenticity.It is not to be"fi sed". L 00LTACO 1qq TA O T. C M p A N Y IFi1 C o M P A N 3 SECONDARY LOGO 4 SECONDARY LOGO 7 SECONDARY LOGO 8 SECONDARY LOGO Grayscale logo an color Do not change background color No clean edges of logo No clean edges of I09D Don't use the grayscale logo on color Do not change the background color of the The edges of the logo are meant to be The edges of the logo are meant to be backgrounds;only on something[hat is contained logos.these should always be green. rough in order to be consistent with the rough in order to be consistent with the being printed black and white. handcrafted nalure of the typography. handcrafted nature of the typography. The only exception to this rule would The only exception to this rule would be on the exterior store signage does be on the exterior crane signage does employ clean edges for practical employ dean edges for practical 26 production reasons, production reasons. 27 BRAND COLORS 5 TEXTURES to CD tv 1) FLAT AND TEXTURED COLORS BACKGROUNDS to CL Brand colors revolve around the primary lime green require flat colors.But when we are using textured The backgrounds we use for Laredo Taco Company are natural and colorful.They are reminiscent of places you of Laredo Taco Company.Accents of yellow and colors to fill spaces and create backdrops,we might actually see someone eating a taco.Painted weathered picnic tables,the hood or tailgate of an old truck, orange add pop,while complimentary colors like should use our textured colors to add character anything but a bright shiny metal table in the store.Not only do these backgrounds speak to authenticity,they darker and lighter greens add range to our pailette. and dimension 10 wide open spaces. add a level of color that breathes life into our food photography.They accent the ingredients of the food. Instances like menus and other messaging will PMS BLACK PMS 376 PMS YELLOW 012 PMS ORANGE 021 PMS 381 PMS 7740 PMS 9060 PENS 476 YELLOW TEXTURE GREEN TEXTURE a 28 29 MELDING TEXTURED COLORS WITH BACKGROUNDS WARMrHOTB BAGRBRWBBB CBBLnHBTO BACKBRG.HOS BRUSH SET71RGS CD m An—YELLOW TEKr.AE AMY BREER 7a.RE M COLORS AND TEXTURES The color of our photography goes a long way to estate to put copy and other messaging over The firanulle of th.mb when a ter oYa a to baa —d Se—el,use big ound M..I—with a o%hardrress.The will ivc PPiPn9 a� f'h° k9' Y 9' 9 convey personality and freshness.We want people However,this process has to be done with care.It Is todeI—newhether the phominwannnre I Th.ahaYeepeelr.m thatfealheredI-IL[Aifferan+si-filesregirediffer 1 i..dL—hen defines warm and cool.Applying yellow lextwe to warm backgrounds bu!gcnemlly the hush'haul'iao4 t�se IEus un your canvas Ala.,the to get excited and hungry when they see our takes attention to dotal and a little finesse to meld and green tZ1l to rwnl backg,a.nda«ernes —,he,;I,.qd 35%vRacily he ps tv 'ale a genfle I—ikon inslead of a dehncd food.We shoot our food on backgrounds that are these backgrounds with our color textute.Below fromphatalaaalR,l.at.re.Bea—that the aalerte.laedoeano' edge.Somefime..wilehingb.ak and fadhbetweener il..d overlay oa top of the food adding on the mask helps 1.acheive+hal balance. complimentary to the colors of the food.The color are some examples of how this meld should look backgrounds we apply on top of the photography when pairing the right color textures with different are meant to enhance the color in the photos, photo background colors. I PROPER IMPROPER convey the brand,and provide us with more real ' ^.cY al :a 'A kr tlya first example we Feve a photo wish a,ich red 6eckgrwmd The This exampleis using the wrarg hackglatmd color.Geen is a alwpm - pops way to meW tka backgrouM with cobr is touss She color that ondaal wuh rod than ydtaw,ao+he+r.nsdmn is going la 6e mare most d.Wy matches the background hue.J.f N.case it is yellow.Fia noft.ble.S—Mly.the brush way smaller and apathy was IQM impodanl to have a Y«y big brush Ihai ham 0%fear-..130-35% There is.till same feathm,but the food looks like it has nhalo around it opacity,so we get vary soft and.uhile t—itiona- because al the sharp color c-t,..l and hard trar.si+ian. 2 PROPER IMPROPER y; eAp fn this aeconde.emple,wehave a pho+o wilhabdgh4 blue beckgraund. The difference is ekar when we use a yellow background wilhthe fn Iiaa case,green is a closer match to the hue hue.With a eery big btight blue.Whin the happens,we eliminate ihe.pporturcty to have a .kdf brush that has 0%hardtmss,at 30-35%opacity,wa csnsmoothy Hanaition that eases la a different rotor.Aso,when we use a Mush at end subtly—.I.the Imrmit—i.m background image to calor.The 100%opacity,we,e left with a strong halo around the food.Low apadty tuck here i$rwt tz be afraid t..I..mare of the photo.Notice how you brushes and a sml.,color match are essential to meal's seamless can see remnants of the backgrwnd*to all the way tuthedght edgc mel'of color textures and backgrounds 30 This results from a 3Q%opacity brush 31 PHOTOGRAPHY STYLE CID WHAT MAKES A LAREDO TACO COMPANY PHOTO? We're proud to make our food right here.There's sit on a table outside to eat.It feels real. an authenticity to our food that is refreshing and For backgrounds,we pick textures and colors somewhat surprising to new customers.We want that complement the color of our food.Reds to emphasize that authenticity.We want to whet compliment bacon strips,yellows mirror eggs, people's appetite.How do we do that?We shcot light blues and greens nod to seafood.Overall, real food on real backgrounds with natural light. these backgrounds feel fresh and exciting through We don't use props to make food look bigger,or their motley of color.They span the spectrum lights in a studio to make it look perfect.Spilled of Mexican flavor and color,and when seen salsa or pico and crumpled foil and styrofoam are together on store menus and other places,they add the supporting characters of our photos.They feel personality to the brand. like someone just picked up their lunch and went to 2Ili 1i;„ 01 Z` u 32 33 TYPOGRAPHY 0 FONTS AND TYPESETTING l ANODYNE REGULAR ABCUEFGHIJKLNIIY tl All Caps and Numbers The way we handle typography speaks to of imperfect cuts that leave a remnant of wood 1'tR i 9 YTf AYE This i.......duy typeface with a ton of texture a RS 1 r Yis A 1 L authenticity in its handcrafted variation.We use or linoleum which get picked up when inked and that can he used for subheads and smalls callouls. F T hand cut type for our headlines,using two custom printed.These fonts are made as art in illustrator 1234567890 #,$ fonts,each having three sets of alphabets,for and cannot be typset.They have to be arranged variety.We mix and match letters from all 6 sets manually in Adobe Illustrator.These details,while 2 MOCHA MATTARI ABCOEI=GHIIKLMN of alphabets fot a truly custom headline.No two tedious,are what add up to make our messaging All Caps and Numbers /� letters repeat.The little remnants that surround the feel handcrafted and worthy to represent the This is a secondary typeface with subtle OPORSUVWXYZ letters,evident in woodcut and linocut art,also add authentic food we make. w texture that can be used for subheads and amalier c°°°nls. 1234567890#.S to the handcrafted feet.They're the result 1 0 a = 3 VENEER REGULAR ABCDEFGHIJKLMN All Caps and Numbers l LAREDO TACO COMPANY 2 LAREDO TACO COMPANY gPQRSTUVWxYI BROTHERS WOODCUT TONIC WOODCUT This is a secondary typeface with subtle lextwe 7Q All Caps and Numbers All Caps and Numbers that feels pretty bold and chunky and can be used 123456189q#.$ ;or subheads and smaller callouls. This is one of the headline fonts custom made for This is the second of the headline fonts custom made for Laredo Taco Company.It should be used in conjuction, Laredo Taco Company.It should be used in conjuction, mixed and matched,with LAREDO TACO COMPANY mixed and matched,with LAREDO TACO COMPANY {� TONIC WOODCUT Use a combination of the 3 BROTHERS WOODCUT.Use a combi n natio of the 3 M R BLACK AB�DEFGYUK11LM N versions so that no two letterscepeal. versions so that no two letters repeal 4 All Caps and Numbers This is a secondary typeface with a ton of OPQRSTUVWIYZ lexiwe that can be used for subheads and LTC BROTHERS WOODCUT-A LTC TONIC WOODCUT-A smallercatlauls. 1234567890 #a$ "ABEDEFGHIJKLMN ABCDEFGHIJKLMH -O P Q R S T U V W XYZ _ `-O P Q R ST U V W X Y z_ 5 PIS CREATININ PRO ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ . 1234567890 #. .S -12 3 4 5 6 78 9'O.$ F Alphabet and Numbers 9 1 P9 y abcdef hi klmno rstuvwx z us- —- - - - - This is a secondary typeface to be used as body 1234567890#.$ y copy many rsent sentence copy docks.It can be used LTC BROTHERS WOODCUT-B LTC TONIC WOODCUT-B as all caps or sentence case. ,A8EDEFGHIJ,KLMN IABcnEFQHI-JKLMN. o —0•P f1 R ST tf�{llAlxYZ --O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 0 6 FAXFONT ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUV WXYZ a! _ i VV •1�� _ _ — - 0 Alphabet and Numbers :1234567890',#, SI,. -1234567 Thi 8SO.$ m abcdefghij stuvwxyz � s iaasecondary typeface lobe used as body t2345fi7$90f]#-$4r#-$ —- — _ - copy in any longer-form copy blocks.It can be used as all caps or sentence case. LTC BROTHERS WOODCUT-C LTC TONIC WOODCUT-C _ -ABCDIEFGHIJKLMN A_ EC. EFGHIJKLMN -OPQRSTU,V•WXYZ _ O1�QR3TUVWXYZ HANDLESON ONE �c�vFFBf/9�KLA1No�0�sruf/!T/Xr� _ F y Sentence Case and Numbers 12345678 9 0 #. - - 4 6 W 12.�e}5 $ 'O, U s This is secondary typeface to be used when we /23�f567890 .s� _ � need a script to call out special talking points,or to 34 mix with heavy headlines and subheads. 35 CREATING OUR TYPOGRAPHY -MAKING- BUEMOS DlAS M TEXTURE, EMPHASIS AND VARIATION HUNGRY , TORTILLAS Typography for Laredo Tace Company is much typography.They are texture,emphasis and PEOPLE more than just selecting a font,typing a line and variation of characters and words.Below are some y LUEBOTACO calling it a day-There are three main things we specifics we should be looking for. consider when evaluating Laredo Teca Company HAPPY I NATURAL TEXTURE GO with Here we see what I-]—adds to the iypogrephy.Th1s - MADE technique is used in headlines.or areas where type ismally YOUR OUT YOU'VE EARNED big.It's ml really tleink 1-t—contriededlit ut-copy because the detail Two TACOS , HERE doesn't show up.Comparing the two examples below,we ORDER W see how a 1i44k ink lextuoe oonlrihules io the feel of Lhe hype. - Tolherighl.we have examplesof how it helps I*meld with FOR THE . be ngea rid!black t nesto Currently we have a library of gmeq TWO. P Rl C E#0 N E � r orange and black textures to we for headlines 1 FO R z�o L.OV E# 0 BREAKFAST TACOS $ BREAKFAST Q' $la 19 rAGO CHORIZO&EGG;o'. $.le1g AC6 POTATO&CHORIZO 4:CrA TC / lxlkA lePYikaa laa l9 FACa BEAN&CHOR[ZO ure.cornx•s roe u�uca SAUSAGE&EGG 440,1 BACON&EGG 44Qrrr BEAH&CHEESE 1 t CHICHARRON 4:0— POTATO a EGG 440.1 HAM&EGG 44U rA HUEVOS A LA MEXICANA 410cr e, �"" ORANGE TEXTURE FO R (A'& LOVE / 60.(�O tL z CREATING EMPHASIS 3 VARIATION �(/fj YOU��O� 6the above emmpleswe can see how we create emphasis in Variation is important to keep lnfaimation organized aswell — headlines by different fonts and nixes Sometimes we use and as dynamic.The bottom example shows haw we use a variely C 0 S ORDER undeline to highlight an important word.This word may pay of fonisin a single piece of messaging.The headers have a 'T/ off a concept or just be[be most important take away.In the son pt and a headline font.The script empaeizes Original and _ top right example,'W1il4as"isthe biggest word,as it's ne:i to Spedally a photo of tortillas being hand-rolled The esampke below[hat T YY O undescorea"Right"as it's written in a script.This enphas zes The bold primary font numbers make a easy to see prxe poinl. • the double meaning of right in Ibis headline_ Secondary fonts we used to organize information like item names and calorie counts. H•nd,Es svlpt LTC T-ic Wsodwt - FORZym&LOVE,V /T,A, ,- CO� I GREEN TEXTURE BLACK TEXTURE limcutremnanta LTC Brothers Woodcut 36 no two"a's are the same 37 3 DIFFERENT TIERS OF LAYOUTS CSI 45 PRIMARY-TIER t LAYING OUT CONTENT 2 Promotional The all direction of Laredo Taco Company creative We've tried to segment brand messaging into This group of messaging is comprised of promotions where a POP(pump toppers.window clings and other in-stare sipagei special after or limited-lime deal is featured.With rust a simple shadd always be kept clean,simple,and easy to read,thus is nuanced.Layouts that work well for 00H three tiers to define these differences.This helps headline and promo name,a price point,and food imagery this ensuring it's a quick get foz guests coming in to the store. boards and print ads with short headlines and a us decide which techniques will be effective photo,don't work as well for layouts that are more in conveying the brand aesthetic as well as informational,with a large amount of copy.How communicating the necessary information can we have solutions that work for different effectively no matter how little or how much types of layouts,that all feel an brand? messaging there is. -RAi PRIMARY-TIER t ;fe Brand Ads r� Ys aski This group of messaging is comprised largely of}Hand OON less.We should let the photography be the hero and maintain and print ads.Communication pieces that are centered a smooth,gradual gradient to our color wash backgrounds. LMRELQ around a brand headline and beautiful pholography.On these Secondary type in these examples should be minimal,with applica5ons,we shook!try and limit headlines to 7 words or emphasis an our primary typefaces. LAREDOTAco BUEOS D�ASlc� 40 N _ FO r 4 f. cet TORTILLAS r EGG,CHORIZ , LAREOOTAco _ - OTO BEAN AT / CHEESE! .. MADE ONLY �lk' . .. *&�HERE 38 39 3 DIFFERENT TIERS OF LAYOUTS A,,; Its Z SECONDARY-TIER 2 3 TERTIARY-TIER 3 Supplemental Menus,Brochures,Long-Form Messaging (70 This group 0mess igirg consists of any piece of Far this tier,we on a paper le,trae to keep Ifie beautiful These are typically items that rely on a heavy amount of hand4awn illustmbons of law Irsgiedents help give texture communication that is not band,promotional.or long-form litre food imagery and color background clean and open with copy to convey information,like menus.brochures and other and dmension while telling hig blodssei copy breathe easy. menus and brodwre&Examplesmighl include coupon%mails a framing device that h-lds all the copy in a designaled, long-form messaging.Menus must show many different food Addbonally,varying fonts and weighls create hierarchy,and and any messaging that requires somewhat heaver copy. organized,and easy-to-read manner. images with long-form food descriptions. separator lines help break up the content in an organized way. With so much information on display,establishing a Neranchy FnOy,the meet kmporlant price paints are given special so items are easy to read and understand is essential.This prominence with their placement over a yellow color strip.Not hierarchy is created by using several design devices:headers only does this increase legibility,it also helps give cusiomens organize copy into categories,and these headline ionrs ilea scanning the menu a quick look at the price. land prominence.Cream backgrounds with scaled-beck. Ee �EQ Q BREAKFAST TACOS BREAKFAST 'Y•"`'^i° pr nn YOUYE EARNER HOMET6WN LVN 1.79 CO POTO TA &CHORIZO 440of HEROO TWO TACas r,,,a,a.e„a.,R.m.E..„ SAUSAGE a EGG 446u1 ® FOR THE CHK HARRON 44 ,0 •4 so cams PRICE#ONE HUEVOS A LA ME)OCANA 440LA .. $250 4 t s.cvk a raa r.:c �'4 �.� E�IPES1�TrJRO 1 yy r WIN Mill 17NLY ONLY - .--. - -- —.-. CATFISH s'N �LO�A $1.79 TACOS PLATES BV SHRIMP _ TO C I N O CHICKEN FAJITA 440cA SERVED WITH TWO SIDES a A TORTILLA PLATES. $�o� )rho BEEFFAJITA44U //��. � BEEFFAIITA Ito wt:. .a,RRN r Eaak `'t.69 PLATE I ;u4r,, -''' PICAIHLLO 440cA l.1kA WRRikae raR]I�FAfe PICADILLO 1Xq-IOfflry LIMITER TIME ONLP! ` 'C - - r} /� `-` CARNITAS 440 rA BEAN a CHORIZO.... a[MOLLE4AS 10MIMO p[1CMa t ,f� `�v CARNE GUISAOA 440 cy MOLLEJAg A70d GIRHE GIIISMA I.r�i I HALF CHICKEN IDG4000ra1 y ��•� CHICKEN FIU17A1 3FC CHICKEN tia-lama CARNITAS rut l;iV-. TENDERS Y7m�FQlra1 F LARE LAaEoo sic .,us aus a-a ,r r.ua n.rt IA(.b � TACO ��,,_ c - ,....ac«os TACO PLATE t�®rr............$2.49 FAIFTA OUESADILLAS 4dOc41......$1.79 •aRk,RrxLcr.az,;ni, IBEEF oR LHiCKEHI ENCHILADAS rm lrcn ......-...$2-49 FAJ ITA NACHOS 446rJ1............51.79 CHIPS YQUESO 4404_.........S1.79 IEaNaCNtpFaACON-JAI,eENPb WESo and 40 41 v t� r y t � 1 COO � o F ; ! f f Page 13®4 BROADCAST: TV & RADIO DIGITAL m m ENGLISH TV SPANISH TV I LAREDO TACO COMPANY PROMOTIONAL TACO ADS Pa �� TH.isace a I r the Love of Tacos:I5_ 1 Por el Amor a Los Tacos: G 15 3DOx6OO Desktop p� ^ l a� cwt I the hardline£cola / 1-]l ,J� �O c' O -made for Laredo f y■VJ_'� Company.This i s an example of Tier 2 layout see page 381. f ► ��.�.,- s1.79 2 Most Important:15 2 Lo mar imporlanle:15 )A t- ® t AREOOTACO ull" 2 EL GRAN TOCINO Q 3 pinud 30 3 Orgull osas: PROMOTIONAL TACO 30 �� ��✓ 1024x512 Twiner INO h ENGLISH RADIO SPANISH RADIO 3 MOBILE BRAND BANNER ADS 480x320 r. f RADIO.60 1 RADIO:60 �., We Love Tacas Y Amamos Tacos —MAKING- - P'l. BuENQs oiAs HUNGRY PEOPLE RADIO 30 2 2 RADIO:30 TORTILLAS : _ How it Peels Como Fut6al -[APPy .4 I•�. �. �� RADIO:15 RADIO.15 3 3 �TACQQTACO Meet El f ampeon •# E€Campeon P= DIGITAL frDN'01 to M 4 DESKTOP BRAND BANNER ADS 6 DESKTOP BRAND BANNER ADS 300.600 300a250 FbR BUEMS NECHO AQUI, BUENOS -MAKING- MADE 'THE LOVE WAS C� DIAS ceA HUNGRY 4TAcoS ps PARA TI TORTILLAS TORTILLAS HAPPY 1 A� TAACC�� HAPPY HERE r ; 3 +` SOCIAL MEDIA � f���•7 t<^.--- } _���-.�-. � 2 [nstagram e7ir� �crir� ` - zq to the Taco Rules lnslagram ads,we TACO RULES TACO RULES ��� � will keep the background and colors consistent-This is a great example of Sh There's always room She There's you can't tell what LAREBOTAcO TACO LARERdTAcp logo inaauncontalnedlomv your salsa is made of, for one more taco. it's not really salsa. 5 DESKTOP BRAND BANNER ADS LAREDOTACO LAREDOTAco 725x90 a SOCIAL MEDIA B Bacon Rules GIFs M ADE �+� HER _» BACON .. 0 DEJES TOCIND NO DE PAN � PEAKS LOUDER PARR MANANA A MAKE NG HUNGRY PEOPLE HA . .. THAN WORDS ry V1YE E�NOMBfE, NEVER BITEk. S1 Lo PUEDES �TAMBIN* ' BUENOS DIAS c�TORTILLAS THE HANDTHAT E TA.... FEEDS YOU BACON_, ES COMER HOY ;i� BE TOCINO r- ,�f FOR THE LOVE # TAUS 46 _ 47 STORE to co EXPERIENCE CL We take pride in staying true to our roots.In the mantras with linoleum cuts,a process that new store experience,we wanted to capture this underscores the individuality of each piece of type authenticity in the look and feel of the brand. and illustration.The crafted illustration and texture Taco stands and hand-painted food menus in aligned naturally with handmade quality food. Mexico made us hungry,and we wanted art We used bright colors unique to ous brand with direction that was reminiscent of authentic,tasty mural art to define the space.Unique wayfinding a and the smell of handmade tortillas took si na _ Mexican food to do the same.Taking those art 9 9 cues,we illustrated our ingredients and brand care of the test. r C O fvl P A N Y Fu rAcO . LAREDO �'�r � • � LAREQO ■ ' I T' Cc j -- 49 STORE ,n M INTERIOR It was important to create a distinct space for illustration decorating the walls.Captivating food Laredo Taco Company that stood apart from illustrations,warm colors,with appetizing food Stripes.The defined Laredo Taco Company space photography work together to create a space that comes to We with bright colors and handcrafted makes hungry people happy. 1AV1 R �. $4.19 - '1.79 394 MADE ll J, , ERE <A Ray } ,ftr� ta�� y �r f � � �� TY t Y . - ti Z�4 tam 50 51 LETTER OF JUSTIFICATION IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DETERMINATION 7-Eleven Fuel Station and Convenience Store at 9th Street&Archibald, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7-Eleven is proposing to construct an automotive fuel station and convenience store ("Store") on vacant land located on the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. 7-Eleven will be applying for a Type 20 license to allow the sale of beer and wine at the convenience store. The sale of alcoholic beverages is being offered as a convenience to customers who do not want to travel to another location that sells alcoholic beverages (i.e., a liquor store or another convenience store). In the current retail market, customers have come to expect alcoholic beverages at gas station convenience stores. The sale of alcoholic beverages will comply with all applicable regulations for the concurrent sale of fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code Section 23790(d)). According to the California Department of Alcoholic Beverages ("ABC"), this Store is located in an area of overconcentration (Census Tract 21.05: 3 licenses allowed; 8 active licenses). Due to the over-concentration of liquor licenses in the census tract, Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code requires City Council to approve a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity prior to issuance of the requested Type 20 License. The following information supports a determination that a Type 20 license at this Store will serve the public convenience. 1. 7-Eleven has policies and procedures to ensure the safe sale of alcoholic beverages. 7-Eleven takes the right to sell age-restricted alcoholic beverages very seriously and ensures that all alcoholic beverages are sold in a legal and responsible manner. As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store employees, the company has put in place one of the most comprehensive crime-deterrence programs in the convenience store industry. These policies and procedures ensure that the sale of alcoholic beverages for off- site consumption at this location will not cause or contribute to crime in the area or otherwise constitute a menace to the public health, safety, or general welfare. 7-Eleven's policies and procedures include the following: "Operation Alert" Training Program. All 7-Eleven employees and new franchisees participate in a multimedia training program on security procedures, proper store maintenance, violence avoidance, and recommended behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially violent encounter. Each trainee is supplies with comprehensive resource materials on crime deterrence and violence avoidance. The robbery rate at 7-Eleven stores has decreased by 65% since implementation of this program. Exhibit D Page 1300 Responsible Alcohol Sales Training. 7-Eleven trains all cashiers and managers to sell alcohol in compliance with California law, such as age verification and prevention of sales of alcoholic beverages that may be detrimental to the public welfare (i.e., the sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated persons). In addition, the training includes the rules associated with the concurrent sale of automotive fuel and alcoholic beverages. Time-Access Safes. 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no more than $50 ($30 at night) in the cash register. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than $30 is kept in the cash register after dark and that the store staffers cannot open the safe. All 7-Eleven stores use a Timed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal amount of money in the register yet still serve customers efficiently. One section of the time-accessed safe contains a locked drop-safe where large bills and checks are deposited by the clerk. Another section dispenses change (coins or bills) only at predetermined time intervals. Security Cameras. 7-Eleven maintains state-of-the art video camera system and alarms in its stores nationwide. This system includes a 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor mounted in clear view of the customers. The alarm system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. The cameras will allow 7-Eleven to confirm whether cashiers comply with all verification requirements for sale of alcoholic beverages. Lighting and "Fishbowl" Layout. The Store will install bright interior and exterior lighting, including adjacent public sidewalks and alley to create a safer environment. In addition, 7-Eleven will place the cash register in the front of the store and keep windows in front of the sales area free of signs and merchandise so police and others can see inside. This is called the "fishbowl" effect because store employees are on display for passersby, including police to see. The "fishbowl" effect will deter crime and minors from attempting to purchase alcoholic beverages at the Store. Quantity, Display, and Storage of Alcoholic Beverages. 7-Eleven will not sell "airline" or small-size bottles of single beers less than 20 ounces at this location. In addition, in accordance with the Business and Professions Code there will be no display of alcoholic beverages in an ice-tub or within five-feet of the front door or cash register and there will be no advertisements for alcoholic beverages on the motor fuel islands. 2. The sale of alcoholic beverages at the 7-Eleven fuel station will be a public convenience and will not have a detrimental effect on the immediate neighborhood. For more than 80 years, 7-Eleven has been American's neighborhood food store, bringing convenience into the lives of millions. Approving a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity will not be detrimental to public health, safety, or general welfare. The sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption is appropriate for a fuel station convenience store with the size and variety of foods and non-alcoholic beverages to be found, and is a service Page 1318 typically expected by the public at such fuel station convenience stores. 7-Eleven's training and safety protocols will ensure that alcoholic beverages are sold in accordance with law. By including the sale of alcoholic beverages at the Store, customers looking for an easy "one-stop" experience while they pump gas are accommodated. "One-stop" shopping results in increased efficiency for customers, and is consistent with the operational plan of convenience stores. Furthermore, by providing one-stop shopping, the Store will provide a convenience to the community that may result in fewer vehicle trips and less traffic congestion. Customers would be inconvenienced if they were forced to purchase gas and snacks at the fuel station convenience store, and alcoholic beverages at a liquor store or at another similar location that may not have the training and controls that 7-Eleven employs. Alcoholic beverages will not comprise a significant amount of shelf space within the Store, and will only amount to a small percentage of the total annual sales from the convenience store. The sale of beer and wine will only be ancillary to the sale of gas and other snacks and items typically contained in a fuel station store, but nevertheless, are still necessary and an expected convenience for the consumer. The evolution of fuel stations and convenience stores over the years is that it now commonplace for fuel station/convenience stores to possess a Type 20 or 21 license in California. Modern day customers have become accustomed to stopping at a fuel station/convenience store for their basic needs, including alcoholic beverages. The sale of alcoholic beverages will not affect the peace or general welfare of the surrounding neighborhood. On the contrary, 7-Eleven's policies and procedures will ensure that alcohol is sold in a legal and responsible manner while enhancing the convenience for customers so that they have an easy one-stop shopping experience. 3. Concurrent Sale of Fuel and Alcoholic Beverages The sale of alcohol will be in strict compliance with California law and all other applicable standards requested by ABC, the Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department, San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department, and the City Council. As mentioned above, the State has specific rules that regulate the concurrent sale of motor fuel and alcoholic beverages (B&P Code § 23790.5(d)). These include the following: • No alcoholic beverages shall be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door unless it is in a permanently affixed cooler. • No advertisement of alcoholic beverages shall be displayed at motor fuel islands. • No sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from a drive-in window. Page 919 • No display or sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made from an ice tub. • No alcoholic beverages advertising shall be located on motor fuel islands and no self- illuminated advertising for alcoholic beverages shall be located on buildings or windows. • Employees on duty between the hours of 10 p.m. and 2 a.m. who sell alcoholic beverages shall be at least 21 years of age to sell alcoholic beverages. Page 1320 v Security Plan ELEVEn PHYSICAL SECURITY ❑ A SECURITY SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED THAT WILL COMBINE PANIC BUTTON "SILENT"ALARM REMOTE AND A CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION MONITOR TO SECURE THE PREMISES. THE MAIN HUB OF THIS SYSTEM WILL BE LOCATED IN THE OFFICE WITHIN THE STORE. DATA WILL BE STORED FOR 30 DAYS. EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED TO PROVIDE DATA TO POLICE WHEN REQUESTED. SECURITY CAMERAS: EIGHT (8) STATE OF THE ART SECURITY CAMERAS WILL BE INSTALLED, FOUR EXTERIOR AND FOUR INTERIOR, TO MONITOR ACTIVITY AND TO AVOID ANY PROBLEMS OR CONCERNS. LOCATION OF THE CAMERAS ARE SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLAN. THE CAMERAS WILL BE OPERATING 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. IT IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT THAT 7-ELEVEN PROVIDES A SAFE AND UPSCALE ENVIRONMENT FOR OUR PATRONS. Lj OUR MAIN POS REGISTER IS BEING REPOSITIONED SO THAT THE PERSON AT THE SALES COUNTER CAN SEE THE ACTIVITY AT THE FRONT ENTRANCE FUEL PAD AREA. Page 621 Page 713 v Security Plan E�Fv�n 1$ OPERATIONAL SECURITY ❑ CASH CONTROL — CONTRACTUALLY STORES ARE REQUIRED TO DO DEPOSIT DAILY RECEIPTS AT BANK SO THAT MINIMAL CASH IS MAINTAINED ON THE PREMISES AT ANY GIVEN TIME. LIMITED AMOUNT OF CASH ON THE PREMISES WILL IN A WELL SECURED AND TIMED SAFE. ALTERNATIVELY, ARMORED VEHICLE PICK IS DONE THREE TIMES A WEEK. POS - WE WILL USE ONLY ONE REGISTER AT NIGHT. DOLLAR BILLS HIGHER THAN 20'S AND LARGER ARE DEPOSITED RIGHT AWAY IN A TIME LOCK SAFE FRONT SIGN & LOITERING- WE WILL POST THE SIGN AT THE FRONT DOOR TO SAY"STORE HAS LESS THAN $ 40 AFTER DARK"AND "TIME LOCK SAFE — CLERK CANNOT OPEN". "NO LOITERING"SIGN WILL ALSO BE POSTED. STORE MAY PLAY CLASSICAL MUSIC ON THE EXTERIOR TO DESIST LOTERING. ❑ SALE OF ALCOHOL — HOURS OF BEER AND WINE SALES (NO HARD LIQUOR, NO SINGLE CANS OF BEER SMALLER THAN 40 OZ. AND NO SINGLE MALTS) SHALL BE FROM 6 AM — 2 AM, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. ALL ALCOHOL VAULT DOORS WILL BE LOCKED AND SECURED AT 2 AM. EMPLOYEES ARE TRAINED TO ASK FOR IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTOMER WHO DO NOT LOOK OF AGE TO PURCHASE BEER AND WINE AND EMPLOYEES ARE ALSO TAUGHT TO FOLLOW PROTOCOLS OF (ABC). Page 622 Page 714 v Security Plan E�Fv�n 1$ ❑ OPERATIONAL SECURITY ❑ HOURS - OPERATION HOURS WILL BE 24 HOURS, SEVEN DAYS A WEEK. LIGHTING - STORE WILL BE WELL LIT, INSIDE AND OUTSIDE, CLEAN AND ORGANIZED TO CREATE A"FISHBOWL" EFFECT, A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO OUR PATRONS. THE APPLICANT WILL PROVIDE SUFFICIENT LIGHTING TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE PREMISES, INCLUDING ADJACENT PUBLIC SIDE WALKS AND ALLEY TO CREATE A SAFER ENVIRONMENT. n LITTER CONTROL - REMOVAL OF LITTER WILL BE ON A DAILY BASIS INCLUDING ADJACENT SIDEWALKS AND ALLEY UNDER THE LICENSEE'S CONTROL. GRAFFITI - REMOVAL OF ALL GRAFFITI TO THE STOREFRONTSHALL BE DONE WITH 24 - 48 HOURS OF NOTICE OR KNOWLEDGE. FRANCHISEE WILL WORK WITH POLICE TO UNDERSTAND ANY GANG ACTIVITY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. Page 623 Page 715 For more than 80 Years,7-Eleven has been American's THE"FISHBOWL" food store,bringing convenience into the lives of millions.As part of its commitment to the communities it serves and its neighborhood store Research indicates that robbers do not like stores that employees,the company has put in place one of the are brightly lit,with store staffers and cash registers most comprehensive crime-deterrence programs in clearly visible from the street.That is why 7-Eleven ELEVEII the convenience store industry. puts the cash register in the front of the stores and • keeps windows in front of the sales area free of signs 7-Eleven developed and implemented its robbery and violence deterrence program in 1 975-76,based on and merchandise so police and others can see inside. research interviews with convicted robbers.The It's called the"fishbowl"effect because store program has been continually updated with ongoing employees are on display for passersby,including research.7-Eleven's crime-deterrence program is police,to see.As part of a nationwide remodeling based on four primary components of visibility into program,the company installed bright interior and _ - and out of the stores,lighting,effective cash control, exterior lighting. and store-personnel training.Additionally,7-Eleven has installed video surveillance systems in its stores. TIMED-ACCESS SAFES "OPERATION ALERT"TRAINING Research also shows that keeping less than$50 in the - - - cash register deters 80 percent of potential robbers. 7-Eleven corporate-store employees and new Most robbers say the"risk"is greater than the"take' franchisees participate in a multimedia training for that small amount of money. program and are supplied with comprehensive 7-Eleven store employees are instructed to keep no resource materials on crime deterrence and violence more than$50($30 at night)In the cash-register- avoidance. Signs notify would-be robbers that less than$30 is The program,called"Operation Alert",includes kept in the cash register after dark and that the store information on security procedures,proper store staffers cannot open the safe.All 7-Eleven stores use maintenance,violence avoidance and recommended a limed-Access Cash Controller to keep a minimal behaviors for managing a robbery or other potentially amount of money in the register yet still serve violent encounter. customers efficiently. The training emphasizes the high value the company One section of the timed-access safe contains a places on the safety of all 7-Eleven store personnel locked cim"afe where large bills and checks are and customers,and 7-Eleven's no-resistance deposited by the clerk.Another section dispenses philosophy toward robbery.At 7-Eleven,the safety of change(coins or bills)only at predetermined time store personnel and customers is more important than intervals. protecting the company's money or property during a robbery. Page 624 Page 716 STATE-OF-THE-ART removing signs from store windows.The result was a -7-Eleven completed a nationwide installation VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEMS 30 percent decrease in robberies in the test stores. of closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its _ _ stores.The company updated its robbery :9 r'w-A six-month follow-up study in Houston deterrence/violence avoidance training program for 7-Eleven has spent millions of dollars to install and indicated the same 30 percent decrease in robberies. store personnel. maintain state-of-the-art video camera systems and The message was that robbers steal for cash,and if alarms in its stores nationwide.This system includes a stores reduce their cash availability and publicize it, 2003-7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of 24-hour, closed-circuit video camera with audio they can deter robberies.The robbery deterrence teenage robbers to see if the younger robbers looked capabilities and a high-resolution color monitor program-including training for store personnel, cash at things differently than the adult robbers.The study mounted in clear view of the customers.The alarm management,additional field staff security managers, found that they look at the target and security system includes fixed and remote-activator devices. posters, signs and decals-was adopted measures in essentially the same way,with escape companywide. route and money being the most important factors. FACTS -A study for 7-Eleven by Athena Research 2004-The Operation Alert training program was The robbery 7-Elevenhas decreased Corporation (Athena)found that security cameras and updated including computer-based training for all by 65 •_ deterrence alarms did not reduce the robbery rate in the stores. program was • . _ _• in 1976. experimental stores.7-Eleven began installation of timed-access cash controller safes in its stores. 2005-7-Eleven began installing new safes with 7-Eleven is recognized high-speed bill acceptors and additional security and industryand - - agencies as 7-Eleven supported a survey by Athena of accountability features. majorthe first - - formal crime armed robbers in prison.The results indicated deterrence program - •- robbers still looked for the same things in stores 2007-"Operation Alert"training, including visibility, Operation Program targeted for robbery-cash availability and visibility lighting and cash control, has been reemphasized in into and out of the stores. all of its stores. been certified/approved in several states. 1991 -One part of a three-part study by the National Associations of Convenience Stores showed robbery HISTORY OF 7-ELEVEN'S decreased in the first year after installation of ROBBERY DETERRENCE PROGRAM high-resolution, closed-circuit television systems and alarms. 1975-The Western Behavioral Sciences Institute, in 1993-7-Eleven began natonwide installation of conjunction with 7-Eleven stores, conducted a closed-circuit television systems and alarms in its robbery deterrence study with a grant from the U.S. stores as part of its nationwide remodeling program. Department of Justice. In the test stores, robbery deterrence measures recommended by robbers were -Athena conducted new research of armed implemented in order to determine their impact on robbers in prison to update its 1985 study,which crime.These steps included training employees in indicated robbers still looked for the same factors. robbery deterrence, reducing available cash and Page 1325 Arco Gas Stationi ►. ' t w �m I _ UpLI '21FR I • cr: , .wr+•; yip _ F Othlll B1v Chevron1 �•IG' • `h1 — — R1J Y 11R_ YY kLiquor ! o� POW 1 1 � • -- - tt * 'r ft/i'iq • Cam' C ��C'� - Cad::r-aroy���'b f•,+"._ r .. •m , I ;�' ampsh m— y a Str• I•i � rT �- �'•j, .r r �' �, r �v� n;; • Il�r: I�� _. d ; ,'�. r - y � C-Ie Fca=Ct. ' _���• �+a'.a1ti,9. JE '>;L: ,. `� 11 _ c � It �,.��x..•" ,y �, 1i(1 a � ^•, � �� • � n•Lezf l)r f V44 .w1 I µ o.,� v _ oo Sl, ' I ti r =~ 1• M ! w. s: 'i � - _ � u �if•rd � � ', �� �f 1ortdav'� ��w ;a�,� � i�l��dr�J I, - O� .p,. � � s' 'r - • � .a._ �.w ��N• ;� 1.e�.�'';.. ,s r`}' •rs } a7.siiuHi„s��gpi �F/�f�NF }.� �,�,,�'1 � ^aa 1.•�3f „� •�++ - �#6 • �" ' rl rMi: liill ,yY.�ti *' iw -° 'I' =k: o'end u (approved to �ewood ay;ice ,t• D '. be �. A �p ='•- i Plaee IHII���''Ia,. t'F4i+�'\ f" � F,� „� I � , r . • '. � � � i a'i,i►�7j F '`�� ��� . ' F nlrt � Wx--��. ^l�a;�1� -`• �:\ +y,k1;�/fir� ..d�`��rFr- �' �.. r•iS�' '!. ���,,,f. •i x y a= � � �tii�l !� �mT,a»k PK• +� ,�,\ � ,7 i•p�N�I•.k v.'- r{ � M1 r m� �� � - N� -.a� 'S"a •:Zl twa� .;�, �' E � m .rum? o''�ti'�'a� •f��`7 F - 'i���'e .� ee �rr. M.r�iw �'�, r• ��a�, Easy Shop Market • 1 it,l, a a �i - - — Arr• o le- JL �� 8usinessm�en�e•l7� :.,r_ �p — `` w AL Station76 Gas �S '��. � P�'�� � � I - • ��Y x ?��'� �'� _ S � T('�d •�L'14 neyrSt a ' } r • �� U ■ x P e 6rest Pr_ �` -. _ w, All �w r V ,I� 4 I I I ' I '�i � 1. 1 1 1 • • ' r �'-- m F �t • I I 5 , r --z a L, j!' Up • 111 •1 I I � -- r� _ � y�� � ntca a�5t'+ �5, �''��. ,' I 9 •I r. is � 7,ih St IL DESIGN REVIEW COMMENTS 7:00 p.m. Sean McPherson, AICP January 19, 2021 MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS/7-ELEVEN -- A request for site plan and architectural review of a new commercial building and service station located on a parcel addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue in the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. This item is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA guidelines under CEQA Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. Site Characteristics: The project site totals approximately 2.33 acres (101,495 square feet) and is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91 Street. The north half of the site is largely vacant while the south half is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and associated improvements such as a parking lot—this building is not directly related to the proposed project and will remain in-place. The site is generally flat and at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9t' Streets and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, and the 9t" Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights. The existing Land Use, General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (G1) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium Residential (R) District Prolect Overview: The applicant proposes the development of a 6,600 square foot, single-story building which proposes to house a 4,595 square foot convenience store (7-Eleven) and a 2,005 square foot restaurant (Laredo Taco). A 3,600 square foot covered patio is proposed at the north of the building and a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy is proposed along the west side of the property. The north elevation faces 91" Street, with the proposed outdoor patio connecting to the sidewalk via pedestrian walkways. The east elevation fronts on Archibald Avenue. A large landscaped setback with multiple pedestrian paths connects the sidewalk along Archibald Avenue to the proposed building and outdoor patio. The site plan illustrates an interior dining area for Laredo Taco, a convenience store area, food preparation areas, bathrooms, and employee backrooms and storage areas. Primary entrances to the building are proposed at the north elevation and west elevations. Exhibit F Page 1320 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORB1S17-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 2 Vehicular access is provided to the site via an access driveway along 911 Street to the west of the proposed building, and another access driveway along Archibald Avenue to the south of the proposed building. Staff notes that an existing vehicular driveway currently provides access to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building. This driveway is proposed to be closed off with new curb, gutter and sidewalk. Access to this existing building and parking lot is proposed via a new shared access driveway leading to the south from the proposed 7-Eleven development. Architecture: The proposed commerciallrestaurant building exhibits a modern vernacular design theme and provides a variety of colors and materials. Notably, each building elevation incorporates a tri-colored metal band, which, according to the applicant, may or may not be illuminated. The east, west and south elevations include a prominent angled wall feature composed of fiberwood siding (Nichiha-brand "Vintagewood Cedar'), though staff notes that this feature is most prominent on the west facade of the building facing interior to the site. The north elevation is dominated by corrugated metal siding (Centria-brand "154 Dark Bronze"), a feature which is also prominently featured on the east and west elevations. Additional fiber cement panels (Nichiha-brand "Empireblock — Gray") along each elevation, and stucco finish along the north, south and east elevations compliment the design. Each elevation also incorporates anodized aluminum storefront glass throughout. The project proposes a varied color pallet, including lighter tones such as "Silverpointe" (SW 7653) and "Reflective White" (SW 7757), and darker colors used for features such as the covered outdoor patio ("Tricorn Black," SW 6256). Staff notes that the applicant proposes a flat-roofed canopy to cover the 14 fueling stations. This canopy incorporates the same tri-colored metal band as the building, which is reflected across each elevation. This is not proposed to be illuminated. The color pallet of the fueling canopy mimics the color pallet of the proposed building. At 17 feet in height, the flat-roofed canopy is intended to be subordinate to the convenience/restaurant building. This is reflected in its lower profile (17 feet in height as opposed to 20 feet in height for the convenience/restaurant building). The proposed project exceeds all applicable development standards for the General Industrial (GI) district, as shown in the table below: Development Standard Required Proposed Complies? (approx.) Maximum 35 feet (at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(1-foot increment from the feet(fueling setback line) canopy) 18.2% (inclusive of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet Front Building Setback Min. 25 feet (covered YES (9'" Street) patio); 86.4 feet (proposed Page 1328 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 3 building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy)_ Min. 45 Feet (Major 70 feet Street Side Setback Arterial/Special Blvd —Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) building) 31.9 feet (911 Average Depth of 25 feet (91 Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet (gth Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(911 St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet(canopy) 120 feet Rear Yard Setback Min. 0 feet (proposed YES building); 90 feet canopy) Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Parking and Landsca in : Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050- 1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls. Parking Ratio Required Parking Provided Parking Convenience Store 3 per 1,000 square feet 14 stalls 14 stalls (plus 14 at fuel pumps) Restaurant 10 per 1,000 square feet 20 stalls 22 stalls TOTAL - 34 stalls 50 stalls The project complies with the City's landscape standards. Site landscape coverage meets the minimum requirement of 10% and includes an overall depth of 25 feet along 9` Street and 45 feet along Archibald Avenue. The landscaping palette includes a variety of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Tentative Parcel Map: As noted, the project also proposes a Tentative Parcel Map to split the existing parcel into two lots. Parcel 1, upon which the subject project is proposed, will be 1.68 Page 1329 DRC COMMENTS DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164— GRANT ROSS FOR ORBISI7-ELEVEN January 19, 2021 Page 4 acres with a lot width of 219 feet (along Y' Street). Parcel 2, upon which the existing commercial industrial building will be located, will be 0,65 acres with a lot width of 119 feet (along Archibald Avenue). Thus, both lots meet development standards for lot size and lot width for new lots within the General Industrial (GI) district. Staff notes that the existing commercial industrial building currently provides 29 parking stalls. Due to the reconfiguration of access driveways relative to the existing multi-tenant commercial industrial building, Parcel 2 will lose approximately 3 parking stalls. In order that this existing building maintain its current number of parking stalls, a shared parking agreement shall be required pursuant to conditions of approval for the project. Staff Comments None Major Issues: The following broad design issues will be the focus of Committee discussion regarding this project. Discuss whether the tri-colored metal band should be illuminated or not. Seconda Issues: Once all of the major issues have been addressed, and time permitting, the Committee will discuss the following secondary design issues. None Policy Issues: The following items are a matter of Planning Commission policy and should be incorporated into the project design without discussion. None Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the Design Review Committee forward the item to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Staff Planner: Sean McPherson, Senior Planner Members Present: Staff Coordinator: Mike Smith, Principal Planner Attachments: Exhibit A: Plan Set Page 1320 RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP SUBTPM20164, A REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE A 2.33 ACRE PROJECT SITE INTO TWO (2) PARCELS OF LAND RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED WITHIN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT ON PROPERTY ADDRESSED 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF - APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of SUBTPM20164, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Tentative Parcel Map request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied the portion of Conditional Use permit DRC2020-00087 involving off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20) and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license. At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to the balance of the development application and return at a later date for consideration. 4. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 5. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 6. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearing on May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Page E523 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 91h Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 is for the subdivision of the 2.33-acre project site into two parcels of land. The service station and convenience store will be located on Parcel 1 (1.86 acres) and the exiting multi-tenant commercial building will remain on Parcel 2 (.65 acres). The existing vehicular entrance serving the multi-tenant commercial building will be demolished, and a new entrance to Parcel 2 will be provided from a shared driveway with Parcel 1; and g. This application is being processed concurrently with Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138 for review of the site plan and design of a service station and convenience store and Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00138 for the operation of a service station and convenience store. Page 022 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The General Plan permits a variety of land uses within industrial districts, such as service stations and convenience stores. The Development Code permits both service stations and convenience stores within the General Industrial (GI) District subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. b. The design or improvements of the tentative parcel map will be consistent with the General Plan, Development Code, and any applicable specific plans. The proposed two parcel tentative parcel map and the proposed service station with convenience store comply with all requirements of the General Plan and Development Code. Each parcel complies with the 0.50-acre minimum lot size and minimum required lot dimensions outlined in Table 17.36.040-1 of the Development Code. Additionally, the proposed service station and convenience store complies with all of the related development standards including buiding setbacks, lot coverage, height, parking and design; and C. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project site is well suited for the proposed service station and convenience store as it is located at the intersection of two public streets and provides two points of vehicle access; and d. The design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage and avoidable injury to humans and wildlife or their habitat. Environmental studies related to traffic, noise, air quality/greenhouse gasses and biological resources were submitted as part of the review of the project which demonstrated that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment; and e. The tentative parcel map is not likely to cause serious public health problems. The subdivision of the project site is not expected to cause serious public health issues, as the proposed tentative parcel map is for the subdivision of the project site into two separate parcels in order to create a separate parcel for the service station and convenience store apart from the existing multi-tenant commercial. The review of the project included the evaluation of environmental studies which concluded that the project would not have a significant impact on the environment. f. The design of the tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easement acquired by the public at large, now of record, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. The subject property does not contain any easements that would limit access to or use of the project site. 4. The Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 - In-Fill Development Projects for the following reasons: (1) the project is consistent with the applicable General Plan designations and all applicable General Plan policies as well as with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (2) the proposed development occurs within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres Page 623 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the project site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (4) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The General Plan Land Use and Zoning Designation for the project site are General Industrial (GI) District, which permits the development and operation of service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The project complies with the City's development standards and design guidelines, including setbacks, height, lot coverage, and design requirements. The project site is located within the City limits, is under five acres, and is surrounded by existing industrial and residential development and City infrastructure. Each of the five environmental factors required to be reviewed under In-Fill Development (15332) exemption were found to not to be significantly impacted based on the following technical studies: an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020). These technical studies determined that any impacts associated with the project will be less than significant. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12th DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: Page 626 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-29 SUBTPM20164 — ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 5 ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 1325 RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MINOR DESIGN REVIEW DRC2020-00138, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12, 2021, including written and oral Page 1326 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 2 staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 911 Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 9th Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk and the 91h Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land use, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the construction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 square foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). The proposed service station will operate 24 hours-a day, 7 days per week. Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 91h Street. The existing driveway which serves the existing multi-tenant industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Page 629 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 3 Resolution 21-19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant located within the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M. to 10:OOP.M. and proposes on- sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087; and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above- referenced meeting and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives of the General Plan. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high-quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The proposed use is in accord with the objective of the Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located. The project site is located within the General Industrial (GI) District which permits service stations and convenience stores subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. C. The proposed use is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. The project complies with all other Development Code requirements of the General Industrial (GI) District as provided in the table below: Page 036 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 4 Development Required Proposed Complies? Standard (approx.) Maximum 35 feet(at front 20 feet Building Height setback) and (building); 17 YES 75 feet(I-footincrement from the feet(fueling setback line) cano 18.2% Floor Area Ratio (inclusive of (FAR) 50-60% covered patio YES and fueling canopy) 33.3 feet (covered Front Building patio); 86.4 Setback(9th Min. 25 feet feet(proposed YES Street) building); 69.6 feet(fueling canopy) Street Side Min. 45 Feet(Major 70 feet Setback Arterial/Special Blvd—Archibald (proposed YES Ave.) buildin 31.9 feet(9th Average Depth of 25 feet(91h Street); 45 feet Street); 70 feet YES Landscape (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 35.5 feet(9th Parking Setback Min. 15 feet(9th St.); 25 feet St.); 90 feet YES (Archibald Ave.) (Archibald Ave. 115 feet Interior Side Yard Min. 5 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 28.5 feet(canopy) 120 feet Rear Yard Min. 0 feet (proposed YES Setback building); 90 feet cano Open Space/Landscape 10% 31.8% YES Standards Page 939 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 5 Pursuant to Development Code Section 17.64.050, Table 17.64.050-1, parking for separate uses is based on certain ratios. Standards for convenience stores require parking at a ratio of 3 stalls for every 1,000 square feet and standards for restaurants require parking at a ratio of 10 stalls for every 1,000 square feet. As such, the proposed project is required to provide 34 parking stalls. In compliance with this standard, the project provides 36 parking stalls onsite, plus an additional 14 stalls at the fueling pump stations, for a total of 50 stalls for an excess of 16 parking stalls d. The proposed use, together with the conditions applicable thereto, will not be detrimental to the public, health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. The project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, April 2021); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley-Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Conditions of Approval, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12t" DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman Page 030 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 21-30 MDR DRC2020-00138— ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS May 12, 2021 Page 6 ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 1343 RESOLUTION NO. 21-31 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DRC2020-00087 — A REQUEST TO OPERATE A SERVICE STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE LOCATED IN THE GENERAL INDUSTRIAL (GI) DISTRICT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ARCHIBALD AVENUE AND 9T" STREET, AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF —APN: 0209-032-35. A. Recitals. 1. Grant Ross, for Orbis real Estate Partners, filed an application for the issuance of Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138, as described in the title of this Resolution. Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Minor Design Review request is referred to as "the application." 2. On the 24th day of February 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a duly noticed public hearing on said application and concluded said hearing on that date. 3. The application is being processed concurrently with a request for a Tentative Parcel Map SUBTPM20164 and a Minor Design Review DRC2020-00138. 4. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, after deliberating on the facts of the project, the Planning Commission denied a request for off-sale beer and wine sales relative to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087 and also recommended that the City Council deny a request for Public Convenience or Necessity (DRC2020-00459) related to the request for the Type 20 alcohol license .At the February 24, 2021 hearing, the Planning Commission also directed City staff and the applicant to consider certain improvements to project and return at a later date for consideration of the remaining entitlements. 5. On May 4, 2021, the Planning Department received a written statement from the applicant indicating their desire to withdraw a request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity related to the request for off-sale beer and wine sales. 6. On the May 12, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga considered the remaining entitlements of the development application. 7. All legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. B. Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows: 1. This Commission hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct. 2. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings on February 24 and May 12, 2021, including written and oral staff reports, together with public testimony, this Commission hereby specifically finds as follows: Page 1344 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 2 a. The subject 2.33-acre (101,495 square foot) project site is located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 91" Street on property addressed 8768 Archibald Avenue (APN: 0209-032-35). The northern two-thirds of the site is largely vacant while the southern third is improved with an existing multi-tenant commercial building and related improvements (parking, drive aisles, landscaping); and b. The site is generally at-grade with Archibald Avenue and 91" Street and is void of any trees. The street frontage along Archibald Avenue is improved with curb, gutter and sidelwalk and the 91" Street frontage is improved with curb and gutter. Neither frontage is currently improved with streetlights; and C. The applicant has requested the subdivision of the subject project area to create two new parcels: Parcel 1, totaling 1.68 acres, will be improved with a service station and convenience store and related parking, drive aisle and landscaped areas, and Parcel 2, totaling 0.65 acres, will remain improved with the aforementioned multi-tenant industrial building and related parking and landscaped areas; and d. The existing land se, and General Plan and Zoning designations for the project site and adjacent properties are as follows: Land Use General Plan Zoning Site Multi-tenant General Industrial General Industrial (GI) commercial/industrial District North Church/Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District South Commercial/Office General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District West Commercial General Industrial General Industrial (GI) District East Multi-Family Residential Medium Residential Medium (R) Residential District e. The applicant proposes the consutrction of a 14-pump service station with a 3,180 squre foot canopy and a 6,600 square foot commercial building which includes a 4,595 square foot convenience store and a 2,005 square foot restaurant. A 3,600 square foot covered patio is also proposed; and f. The operation of the service station requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). The proposed service station will operate 24 hours-per-day, 7 days per week. Vehicle access to the fuel island will be from two new access driveways, one on Archibald Avenue and one on 9tn Street. The existring driveway which serves the existing multi-tennt industrial commercial building will be demolished and replaced with a new access driveway on Archibald Avenue; and g. The operation of a convenience store requires the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (Development Code Table 17.30.030-1). Pursuant to Planning Commission Resolutioin 21-19 dated March 10, 2021, off-sale alcohol sales (Type 20) are prohibited. The proposed convenience store will also operate 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The restaurant Page 643 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 3 located within the convenience store will operate from 5:OOA.M. to 10:OOP.M. and proposes on- sale beer and wine sales (Type 41)which is permitted and not subject to Conditional Use Permit DRC2020-00087; and h. Since the February 24, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing, the applicant has revised the project to now provide two electric vehicle charging stations, a commitment to design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) "Silver" standards, Bio-Diesel gasoline in the event that the service station sells diesel gasoline, and limit visibility of tobacco products so as to prevent accessibility of tobacco products to minors; and i. The convenience store will sell grocery items, including fresh food and organic food, and will place such items throughout the store as well as near the entrance of the convenience store; and 3. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Commission during the above-referenced public hearings and upon the specific findings of facts set forth in Paragraphs 1 and 2 above, this Commission hereby finds and concludes as follows: a. The proposed use is allowed within the applicable zoning district and complies with all other applicable provisions of this zoning code, Municipal Code, general plan, and any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. The project meets all relevant standards for development within the General Industrial (GI) District and complies with the General Plan. Further, with the revisions made to the project, it meets the intent of the General Plan. As the project now proposes to expand fresh food and grocery items, the project meets the intent of General Plan Land Use Goal LU-6, which provides that the City "Promote the stability of southwest Rancho Cucamonga residential neighborhoods," while Policy LU-6.1 elaborates by stating that the City shall continue to encourage commercial and community services that meet community needs." Southwest Rancho Cucamonga generally lacks options for fresh foods and grocery amenities. As the project has now been revised to eliminate alcohol sales and expand fresh food sales, the project meets the intent of both General Plan Goal LU-6 as well as Policy LU-6.1. Further the project also meets Goal ED-4 which requires that the City "implement consistent high-quality standards for all future development," which is further elaborated by Policy ED-4.1 which "encourage(s) high -quality design for infill development and continue to support high-quality uses." The project as proposed now commits to achieving LEED Silver design standards and providing electric vehicle chargers for the public's benefit to minimize the project's impact on the environment. b. The site is physically suited for the type, density, and intensity of the proposed use including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards. The project site is physically suitable for the proposed use as it provides appropriate site access, has all utility services available, and can be conditioned to meet all related performance criteria and development standards for the proposed use. C. Granting the permit would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity in which the project is located. At the February 24, 2021 public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to deny the applicant's request for off-sale beer and wine sales (Type 20 Page 036 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 4 alcohol license). The applicant has amended the development proposal to ensure that no tobacco or tobacco related products will be advertised and that all tobacco and tobacco related product will be kept behind the cashier's counter, so as not to be easily accessible by minors as the project is within proximity to one elementary school and one middle school. The applicant has further amended the project plans to demonstrate that those areas within the convenience store which were previously dedicated to the sale of alcohol will now be dedicated to the sale of fresh foods. Therefore, the proposed use will benefit the public health, safety, and welfare. 4. Based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, together with all written and oral reports included for the environmental assessment for the application, the Planning Commission finds that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect upon the environment and adopts a Categorical Exemption, based upon the findings as follows: a. The Planning Department staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies as a Class 32 exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 — In-Fill Development Projects. The applicant has provided staff with various analyses demonstrating that the project qualified for this exemption. These studies include an Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Evaluation (Urban Crossroads, April 2021); Noise Assessment (Urban Crossroads, September 2020); Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (Kimley- Horn, September 2020); Revised Focus Traffic Assessment (Urban Crossroads January 2021); and a Biological Due Diligence Investigation (ELMT Consulting, July 2020).The Planning Commission has reviewed the Planning Department's determination of exemption, and based on its own independent judgment, concurs in the staff's determination of exemption. 5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, 3, and 4 above, this Commission hereby approves the application subject to each and every condition set forth in the Standard Conditions, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference 6. The Secretary to this Commission shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. APPROVED AND ADOPTED THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2021. PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA BY: Tony Guglielmo, Chairman ATTEST: Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary I, Anne McIntosh, AICP, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed, and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of May 2021, by the following vote-to-wit: Page 035 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 20-31 CUP DRC2020-00087 — GRANT ROSS FOR ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS MAY 12, 2021 Page 5 AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: Page 1346 Conditions of Approval RANCHO [�',,11CAMONGA Community Development Department ON Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. A shared parking and access agreement between both resultant parcels relative to the tentative parcel map shall be recorded prior to final occupancy. 2. Signage and lighting shall be treated sensitively so as not to create a nuisance to residential properties across Archibald Avenue. Specifically, all signage shall be either externally illuminated or provide "halo lit" illumination. Internally illuminated signage shall not be permitted. Further, lighting along pathways within landscaped setbacks along 9th Street and Archibald Avenue shall be treated with pedestrian level lighting, which may include low-level bollards with downlighting. The tri-colored band surrounding the building shall not be illuminated. 3. The applicant shall design the project to meet Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design ("LEED") silver standards and cause the building to be certified as such by the U.S. Green Building Council. 4. Off-sale alcohol sales are prohibited pursuant to the Planning Commission's Resolution of Denial of off-sale alcohol sales dated March 10, 2021 and the applicant has withdrawn related requests for a determination of findings for Public Convenience or Necessity. 5. Electric vehicle charging stations shall be maintained in good working order and remain available to the public for use at all times. 6. In the event that the service station includes sale of diesel gasoline, diesel shall be replaced with biodiesel fuel in perpetuity. 7. All cigarette and tobacco products shall be only accessible by the cashier/clerk and not displayed near the store entrance. Further, no windows facing Archibald Avenue or within view of the elementary school across Archibald Avenue shall advertise tobacco or tobacco products, nor shall any window advertisements for alcohol sales relative to the restaurant be visible from Archibald Avenue or the elementary school. 8. Add your condition here! Standard Conditions of Approval g Printed:5/6/2021 www.CityofRC.us Page 939 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 9. This project is subject to public art requirement outlined in Chapter 17.124 of the Development Code. Prior to the issuance of building permits (for grading or construction), the applicant shall inform the Planning Department of their choice to install public art, donate art or select the in-lieu option as outlined in 17.124.020.D. If the project developer chooses to pay the in-lieu fee, the in-lieu art fee will be invoiced on the building permit by the City and shall be paid by the applicant prior to building permit issuance. If the project developer chooses to install art, they shall submit, during the plan check process, an application for the art work that will be installed on the project site that contains information applicable to the art work in addition to any other information as may be required by the City to adequately evaluate the proposed the art work in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 17.124. If the project developer chooses to donate art, applications for art work donated to the City shall be subject to review by the Public Art Committee which shall make a recommendation whether the proposed donation is consistent with Chapter 17.124 and final acceptance by the City Council. No final approval, such as a final inspection or the a issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, for any development project (or if a multi-phased project, the final phase of a development project) that is subject to this requirement shall occur unless the public art requirement has been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the Planning Department. 10. The applicant shall sign the Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval provided by the Planning Department. The signed Statement of Agreement and Acceptance of Conditions of Approval shall be returned to the Planning Department prior to the submittal of grading/construction plans for plan check, request for a business license, and/or commencement of the approved activity. 11. Copies of the signed Planning Commission Resolution of Approval or Approval Letter, Conditions of Approval, and all environmental mitigations shall be included on the plans (full size). The sheet(s) are for information only to all parties involved in the construction/grading activities and are not required to be wet sealed/stamped by a licensed Engineer/Architect. 12. Landscaping and irrigation shall be designed to conserve water through the principles of water efficient landscaping per Development Code Chapter 17.82. 13. The signs indicated on the submitted plans are conceptual only and not a part of this approval. Any signs proposed for this development shall comply with the Sign Ordinance and shall require separate application and approval by the Planning Department prior to installation of any signs. 14. Approval of this request shall not waive compliance with all sections of the Development Code, all other applicable City Ordinances, and applicable Community, Specific Plans and/or Master Plans in effect at the time of Building Permit issuance. www.CityofRC.us Page 648 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 2 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Planning Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. The site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the approved plans which include Site Plans, architectural elevations, exterior materials and colors, landscaping, and grading on file in the Planning Department, the conditions contained herein, the Development Code regulations. 16. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) required and/or proposed shall be installed at locations that are not within direct view or line-of-sight of the main entrance. The specific locations of each DDC and FDC shall require the review and approval of the Planning Department and Fire Construction Services/Fire Department. All Double Detector Checks (DDC) and Fire Department Connections (FDC) shall be screened behind a 4-foot high block wall. These walls shall be constructed of similar material used on-site to match the building. 17. All ground-mounted utility appurtenances such as transformers, AC condensers, etc., shall be located out of public view and adequately screened through the use of a combination of concrete or masonry walls, berming, and/or landscaping to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. For single-family residential developments, transformers shall be placed in underground vaults. 18. All parkways, open areas, and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the property owner, homeowners' association, or other means acceptable to the City. Proof of this landscape maintenance shall be submitted for Planning Director and Engineering Services Department review and approved prior to the issuance of Building Permits. 19. A detailed on-site lighting plan, including a photometric diagram, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director and Police Department (909-477-2800) prior to the issuance of Building Permits. Such plan shall indicate style, illumination, location, height, and method of shielding so as not to adversely affect adjacent properties. Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. The existing ramp located at the southwest corner of Archibald Avenue and 9th Street shall be evaluated for conformance to current ADA regulations. If the ramp does not meet ADA regulations then the developer shall be responsible for providing design and reconstruction of the ramp for compliance. Design shall be completed prior to issuance of a grading permit and improvements secured for prior to issuance of Building permit. The reconstruction along with all public improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy. 2. The project shall share a common driveway on Archibald Avenue between parcels 1 and 2 of tentative parcel map 20164. www.CityofRC.us Page 649 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 3 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 3. Fiber: The proposed development is slated to be included in the City's Fiber Optic Master Plan that would provide a City owned Fiber-to-the-Premise (FTTP) infrastructure. The City will require 1-4" UG Fiber Optic dark conduit on the south side of 9th Street along the project boundary. An additional 14" fiber optic conduit will be required on Archibald Ave along the project boundary where both of the end runs will require a 3'x4'x3' pullbox on each end. This infrastructure will eventually be interconnect to the City's existing fiber optic backbone conduit on the NWC of Archibald and 9th. The size, placement and location of the conduit and vaults shall be shown on the Street Improvement and/or Public Improvement Plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. On site, the City will require 1-2" UG HDPE or equal fiber optic conduit to be placed underground within a duct and structure system to be installed joint trench by the Developer per Standard Drawing 135-137 and interconnected into the City's 4" fiber optic conduit. The size, placement and location of the conduit and/or vaults shall run into the building's telecommunication room and be shown on the final dry utility onsite substructure plans and subject to the Engineering Services Department's review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever comes first. 4. It shall be the developer's responsibility to have the current FIRM Zone designation removed from the project area. The developer shall provide drainage and/or flood protection facilities sufficient to obtain a Zone "X" designation. The developer's engineer shall prepare all necessary reports, plans, and hydrologic/hydraulic calculations. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) shall be obtained from FEMA prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits, whichever occurs first. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) shall be issued by FEMA prior to occupancy or improvement acceptance, whichever occurs first. 5. At the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue, this leg of the intersection shall be reconstructed with a 35-foot curb return radius. The ADA ramp at this leg of the intersection shall be constructed per current ADA regulations. City Drawing/Plan No. 1094 shows the traffic signal poles constructed behind a future 35-foot radius curb return. In the event a traffic signal pole was constructed in a location that conflicts with the reconstructed curb return (or if the pedestrian buttons do not meet current ADA regulations, or other unforeseen issues), the applicant shall prepare a traffic signal modification plan for review and approval by the City. The traffic signal modification shall be constructed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a building certificate of occupancy. Standard Conditions of Approval 6. Corner property line cutoffs shall be dedicated per City Standards. www.CityofRC.us Page 050 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 4 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 7. Rights-of-way and easements shall be dedicated to the City for all interior public streets, community trails, public paseos, public landscape areas, street trees, traffic signal encroachment and maintenance, and public drainage facilities as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. Private easements for non-public facilities (cross-lot drainage, local feeder trails, etc.) shall be reserved as shown on the plans and/or tentative map. 8. A final drainage study shall be submitted to and approved by the City Engineer prior to final map approval or the issuance of Grading Permits, whichever occurs first. All drainage facilities shall be installed as required by the City Engineer. 9. ** CD Information Required Prior to Sign-Off for Building Permit Prior to the issuance of building permits, if valuation is greater or equal to $100,000, a Diversion Deposit and a related administrative fee shall be paid for the Construction and Demolition Diversion Program. The deposit is fully refundable if at least 65% of all wastes generated during construction and demolition are diverted from landfills, and appropriate documentation is provided to the City. Applicant must identify if they are self-hauling or utilizing Burrtec prior to issuance of a building permit. Proof of diversion must be submitted to the Environmental Engineering Division within 60 days following the completion of the construction and /or demolition project. Contact Marissa Ostos, Environmental Engineering, at (909) 774-4062 for more information. Instructions and forms are available at the City's website, www.cityofrc.us, under City Hall / Engineering / Environmental Programs/ Construction & Demolition Diversion Program. 10. A signed consent and waiver form to join and/or form the appropriate Landscape and Lighting Districts shall be filed with the Engineering Services Department prior to final map approval or issuance of Building Permits whichever occurs first. Formation costs shall be borne by the developer. The project shall be annexed into LMD3B, SLD 1 and SLD 6. 11. Add the following note to any private landscape plans that show street trees: "All improvements within the public right-of-way, including street trees, shall be installed per the public improvement plans." If there is a discrepancy between the public and private plans, the street improvement plans will govern. www.CityofRC.us Page 653 s Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 5 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 12. Install street trees per City street tree design guidelines and standards as follows. The completed legend (box below) and construction notes shall appear on the title page of the street improvement plans. Street improvement plans shall include a line item within the construction legend stating: "Street trees shall be installed per the notes and legend on Sheet (typically Sheet 1)." Where public landscape plans are required, tree installation in those areas shall be per the public landscape improvement plans. Street Name: Archibald Avenue Botanical Name: Platanus acerifolia Common Name: California Sycamore Min. Grow Space: 40' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 40-feet Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Street Name: 9th Street Botanical Name: Quercus ilex Common Name: Holly Oak Min. Grow Space: 50' o/c (standard trunk) Spacing: 50' Size: 24" box Qty.: to be determined during design Construction Notes for Street Trees: 1)All street trees are to be planted in accordance with City standard plans. 2) Prior to the commencement of any planting, an agronomic soils report shall be furnished to the City inspector. Any unusual toxicities or nutrient deficiencies may require backfill soil amendments, as determined by the City inspector. 3) All street trees are subject to inspection and acceptance by the Engineering Services Department. Street trees are to be planted per public improvement plans only. 13. Intersection line of sight designs shall be reviewed by the City Engineer for conformance with adopted policy. On collector or larger streets, lines of sight shall be plotted for all project intersections, including driveways. Local residential street intersections and commercial or industrial driveways may have lines of sight plotted as required. 14. All public improvements on the following streets shall be operationally complete prior to the issuance of Building Permits: www.CityofRC.us Page 654 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 6 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Engineering Services Department Standard Conditions of Approval 15. All public improvements (interior streets, drainage facilities, community trails, paseos, landscaped areas, etc.) shown on the plans and/or tentative map shall be constructed to City Standards. Interior street improvements shall include, but are not limited to, curb and gutter, AC pavement, drive approaches, sidewalks, street lights, and street trees. 16. Street trees, a minimum of 15-gallon size or larger, shall be installed per City Standards in accordance with the City's street tree program. 17. Construct improvements as outlined in the traffic impact analysis and as follows, 1. At the intersection of 9th St and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the eastbound approach of 9th St from one left turn lane and one shared through/right-turn lane to consist of one shared left-turn/through lane and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the eastbound approach of 9th St and construct all traffic signal equipment as needed. 1. At the intersection of Arrow Rte and Archibald Ave. A. Re-stripe the northbound approach of Archibald Ave to include an additional exclusive right turn lane, and implement a right turn overlap including all traffic signal equipment as needed. A separate project had been conditioned to construct the following improvements, should these improvements be completed prior to the above improvements, a fair share contribution to the improvements constructed shall be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Improvements conditioned by separate project. A. Re-stripe the eastbound and westbound Arrow Route approach from one left-turn lane, one through lane and one shared through/right turn lane to consist of one left-turn lane, two through lanes and one right-turn lane. B. Implement right-turn overlap phasing at the westbound Arrow Route approach. C. Modify existing eastbound and westbound protected left turn operation to protected/permissive left turn operation, including all traffic signal equipment as needed. Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Fire apparatus access (fire lane) design, construction, and identification are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 2. Fire extinguishers are required in accordance with Section 906 of the California Fire Code. Consult with the Fire Inspector for the correct type, size, and exact installation locations. www.CityofRC.us Page 053 s Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 7 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Fire Prevention / New Construction Unit Standard Conditions of Approval 3. A Knox Box key box is required in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-9. Additional boxes may be required depending on the size of the building, the location of fire protection and life safety system controls, and the operational needs of the Fire District. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. If an installed Knox Box is available to this project or business, keys for the building/suite/unit are required to be provided to the Fire Inspector at the final inspection. 4. A Hazardous Materials Business Plan is required to be submitted to the San Bernardino County Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA). Submittal can be made electronically through the California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) at https://cers.calepa.ca.gov/ 5. A Hazardous Materials Management Plan and a Hazardous Materials Inventory Statement are required to be submitted to the Fire District. See Sections 5001.5.1 and 5001.5.2 of the California Fire Code. 6. One or more of the operations in use or proposed for this building/business requires a Fire Code Operating Permit to be issued in accordance with the Fire Code and Fire District Standard 1-1. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 7. Due to the type of construction, construction materials, the floor area of the project, and known risks associated with projects of this nature, a Fire Protection and Site Safety plan is recommended for this project. Fire District Standard 33-3 provides the elements of a Fire Prevention and Site Safety plan. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 8. Street address and unit/suite signage for commercial and industrial buildings are required to be in accordance with Fire District Standard 5-8. The Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 9. Identification of fire protection systems and components, fire alarm systems and components, and equipment and devices associated with fire and life safety systems is required to be in accordance with Fire District Standards 5-5 and 5-10. The Standards have been uploaded to the Documents section. 10. A suppression system is required to protect, the exhaust duct, the hood, and the grease producing appliances. 11. Commercial cooking suppression systems are required to be electrically supervised (monitored) in accordance with Fire District Standard 9-3. A copy of the Standard has been uploaded to the Documents section. 12. Plans for suppression systems are required to be submitted separately and issued a separate permit. Submit all plans to the Building & Safety Department for routing to the Fire District. Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions www.CityofRC.us Page 056 s Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 8 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Building and Safety Services Department Please be advised of the following Special Conditions 1. When the Entitlement Review is approved submit complete construction drawings including structural calculations, energy calculations, and a site specific soils report to Building and Safety for plan review in accordance with the current edition of the California Building and Fire Codes including all local ordinances and standards which are effective at the time of Plan Check Submittal. The new structure is required to be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers per the CBC/CFC NFPA 13 and the Current RCFPD Ordinance Standard 9-5. Disabled access for the site and buildings must be in accordance to the State of California and ADA regulations. Where EV charging stations are provided they must be ADA accessible in accordance to the current edition of the California Building Code. Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 1. The Water Quality Management Plan shall show a oil-water separator as a BMP between the fueling islands and the bio-retention system BMP. 2. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with current adopted California Building Code and/or the California Residential Code, City Grading Standards, and accepted grading practices. The Grading and Drainage Plan(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the approved conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan. 3. A soils report shall be prepared by a qualified Engineer licensed by the State of California to perform such work. Two copies will be provided at grading and drainage plan submittal for review. Plans shall implement design recommendations per said report. 4. The final Grading and Drainage Plan, appropriate certifications and compaction reports shall be completed, submitted, and approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, prior to the issuance of building permits. 5. A separate Grading and Drainage Plan check submittal is required for all new construction projects and for existing buildings where improvements being proposed will generate 50 cubic yards or more of combined cut and fill. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall be prepared, stamped, and wet signed by a California licensed Civil Engineer prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with the City of Rancho Cucamonga Dust Control Measures and place a dust control sign on the project site prior to the issuance of a grading permit. All dust control sign(s) shall be located outside of the public right of way. 7. If a Rough Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit are submitted to the Engineering Services Department for review, the rough grading plan shall be a separate plan submittal and permit from Precise Grading and Drainage Plan/Permit. 8. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Grading and Drainage Plan shall show the accessibility path from the public right of way and the accessibility parking stalls to the building doors in conformance with the current adopted California Building Code. All accessibility ramps shall show sufficient detail including gradients, elevations, and dimensions and comply with the current adopted California Building Code. www.CityofRC.us Page 655 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 9 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 9. The Grading and Drainage Plan shall implement City Standards for on-site construction where possible, and shall provide details for all work not covered by City Standard Drawings. 10. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the grading plan shall show that all manufactured slopes shall be a minimum 2-foot offset from the public right of way, permitted line, or the adjacent private property. All slope offsets shall meet the requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 11. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the grading and drainage plan shall show the maximum parking stall gradient at 7 percent. Accessibility parking stall grades shall be constructed per the, current adopted California Building Code. 12. The applicant shall provide a grading agreement and grading bond for all cut and fill combined exceeding 5,000 cubic yards prior to issuance of a grading permit. The grading agreement and bond shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee. 13. The final grading and drainage plan shall show existing topography a minimum of 100-feet beyond project boundary. 14. This project shall comply with the accessibility requirements of the current adopted California Building Code. 15. Grading Inspections: a) Prior to the start of grading operations the owner and grading contractor shall request a pre-grading meeting. The meeting shall be attended by the project owner/representative, the grading contractor and the Building Inspector to discuss about grading requirements and preventive measures, etc. If a pre-grading meeting is not held within 24 hours from the start of grading operations, the grading permit may be subject to suspension by the Building Inspector; b) The grading contractor shall call into the City of Rancho Cucamonga Building and Safety Department at least 1 working day in advance to request the following grading inspections prior to continuing grading operations: i) The bottom of the over-excavation; ii) Completion of Rough Grading, prior to issuance of the building permit; iii) At the completion of Rough Grading, the grading contractor or owner shall submit to the Permit Technicians (Building and Safety Front Counter) an original and a copy of the Pad Certifications to be prepared by and properly wet signed and sealed by the Civil Engineer and Soils Engineer of Record; iv) The rough grading certificates and the compaction reports will be reviewed by the Associate Engineer or a designated person and approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 16. All roof drainage flowing to the public right of way (Archibald Avenue) must drain under the sidewalk through a parkway culvert approved by the Engineering Department. This shall be shown on both the grading and drainage plan and Engineering Services Department required plans. www.CityofRC.us Page 658 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 10 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 17. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the permitted grading plan (or architectural site plan) set shall show in each of the typical sections and the plan view show how the separations between the building exterior and exterior ground surface meet the requirements of Sections CBC1804.3/CRC R401.3, CBC2304.11.2.2/CRC R317.1(2) and CBC2512.1.2/CRC R703.6.2.1 of the current adopted California Building Code/Residential Code. 18. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall obtain a signed and notarized letter from the adjacent property owner(s) for ALL work proposed on the adjacent property. The letter shall be scanned and pasted onto the permitted grading plan set. The letter shall show on either the title sheet or a detail sheet of the grading and drainage plan set. 19. Prior to approval of the project-specific storm water quality management plan, the applicant shall submit to the City Engineer, or his designee, a precise grading plan showing the location and elevations of existing topographical features, and showing the location and proposed elevations of proposed structures and drainage of the site. 20. A drainage study showing a 100-year, AMC 3 design storm event for on-site drainage shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer, or his designee, for review and approval for on-site storm water drainage prior to issuance of a grading permit. The plan and report shall contain water surface profile gradient calculations for all storm drain pipes 12-inches and larger in diameter. All reports shall be wet signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record. In addition, the project specific drainage study shall provide inlet calculations showing the proper sizing of the water quality management plan storm water flows into the proposed structural storm water treatment devices. 21. Private sewer, water, and storm drain improvements will be designed per the latest adopted California Plumbing Code. Private storm drain improvements shall be shown on the grading and drainage plan. 22. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy or final sign off by the Building Inspector the engineer of record shall certify the functionality of the storm water quality management plan (WQMP) storm water treatment devices and best management practices (BMP). 23. Prior to approval of the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), the WQMP shall include a copy of the project Conditions of Approval. 24. Prior to issuance of a Grading Permit the applicant shall obtain a Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID). The WDID number shall also be shown on the WQMP Site and Drainage Plan document. 25. The land owner shall provide an inspection report on a biennial basis for the structural storm water treatment devices, commonly referred to as BMPs, to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. The land owner shall maintain on a regular basis as described in the Storm Water Quality Management Plan prepared for the subject project. 26. The land/property owner shall follow the inspection and maintenance requirements of the approved project specific Water Quality Management Plan and shall provide a copy of the inspection reports on a biennial basis to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Environmental Program Manager. www.CityofRC.us Page 659 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 11 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 27. A final project-specific Storm Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be approved by the City Engineer, or his designee, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga's "Memorandum of Storm Water Quality Management Plan" shall be recorded prior to the issuance of a grading permit or any building permit. 28. The Site and Drainage Plan in the final project-specific Water Quality Management Plan shall show the locations of all roof downspout drains. If required for storm water quality purposes, the downspouts shall include filters. 29. The final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP) shall include executed maintenance agreements along with the maintenance guidelines for all proprietary structural storm water treatment devices (BMP's). In the event the applicant cannot get the proprietary device maintenance agreements executed prior to issuance of a grading permit, the applicant is required to submit a letter to be included within the WQMP document, and scanned and pasted onto the Site and Drainage Plan which states that prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy with applicant shall enter into a contract for the maintenance of the proprietary storm water treatment device. If the proprietary storm water treatment device is part of a residential subdivision, prior to the sale of the residential lot, the developer shall include maintenance agreement(s) as part of the sale of the residential lot to the buyer. A copy of the maintenance agreements to be included in the sale of the property shall be included within the WQMP document. 30. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and approval of the project specific water quality management plan all private storm water catch basin inlets shall include insert filters to capture those pollutants of concern as addressed in the in the final project-specific water quality management plan (WQMP). At a minimum catch basin insert filters to capture trash and other floating debris. All catch basin insert filters shall be maintained on a regular basis as described in the "Inspection and Maintenance Responsibility for Post Construction BMP" section of the final project-specific water quality management plan. 31. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Final Project-Specific Water Quality Management Plan shall include a completed copy of "Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Worksheet" located in Appendix D "Section VII — Infiltration Rate Evaluation Protocol and Factor of Safety Recommendations, ..." of the San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans. The infiltration study shall include the Soil Engineer's recommendations for Appendix D, Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors". 32. Prior to approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall have a soils engineer prepare a project-specific infiltration study for the project for the purposes of storm water quality treatment. The infiltration study and recommendations shall follow the guidelines in the current adopted "San Bernardino County Technical Guidance Document for Water Quality Management Plans". 33. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy by the City Engineer, or his designee, the civil engineer of record shall file a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Post Construction Storm Water Treatment Devices As-Built Certificate with the Environmental Programs Coordinator, City of Rancho Cucamonga Engineering Services Department. www.CityofRC.us Page 658 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 12 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 34. GROUND WATER PROTECTION: Prior to approval of the final project specific water quality management plan (WQMP), the WQMP document shall meet the requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R8-2010-0036 (NPDES No. CAS 618036), the San Bernardino County Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Separation (MS4) Permit reads: Section XI.D(Water Quality Management Plan Requirements).8(Groundwater Protection): Treatment Control BMPs utilizing infiltration [exclusive of incidental infiltration and BMPs not designed to primarily function as infiltration devices (such as grassy swales, detention basins, vegetated buffer strips, constructed wetlands, etc.)] must comply with the following minimum requirements to protect groundwater: a. Use of structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause or contribute to an exceedance of ground water quality objectives. b. Source control and pollution prevention control BMPs shall be implemented to protect groundwater quality. The need for pre-treatment BMPs such as sedimentation or filtration should be evaluated prior to infiltration. c. Adequate pretreatment of runoff prior to infiltration shall be required in gas stations and large commercial parking lots. (NOTE: The State Water Quality Control Board defines a large commercial parking lot as `100,000 sq. ft. or more of commercial development to include parking lot (with 100 or more vehicle traffics), OR, by means of 5,000sgft or more of allowable space designated for parking purposes'). d. Unless adequate pre-treatment of runoff is provided prior to infiltration structural infiltration treatment BMPs must not be used for areas of industrial or light industrial activity{77), areas subject to high vehicular traffic (25,000 or more daily traffic); car washes; fleet storage areas; nurseries; or any other high threat to water quality land uses or activities. e. Class V injection wells or dry wells must not be placed in areas subject to vehicular{78} repair or maintenance activities{79}, such as an auto body repair shop, automotive repair shop, new and used car dealership, specialty repair shop (e.g., transmission and muffler repair shop) or any facility that does any vehicular repair work. f. Structural infiltration BMP treatment shall not be used at sites that are known to have soil and groundwater contamination. g. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall be located at least 100 feet horizontally from any water supply wells. h. The vertical distance from the bottom of any infiltration structural treatment BMP to the historic high groundwater mark shall be at least 10-feet. Where the groundwater basins do not support beneficial uses, this vertical distance criteria may be reduced, provided groundwater quality is maintained. i. Structural infiltration treatment BMPs shall not cause a nuisance or pollution as defined in Water Code Section 13050. www.CityofRC.us Page 659 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 13 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Grading Section Standard Conditions of Approval 35. The permitted grading plan and the final project-specific water quality management plan are proposing stormwater detention basin (commonly referred to as BMPs) for the treatment of storm water runoff as required in the current adopted Municipal Separate Storm Sewers Systems (MS4) Permit. The depth of the proposed retained water equals or exceeds 18-inches. Therefore prior to the issuance of a grading permit and approval of the final project-specific water quality management plan the applicant shall show a barrier a minimum of 60-inches above the finished ground surface. 36. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for non-residential projects the applicant shall show on the electrical plans and the permitted grading plan set the location for a future installation of an Electric Vehicle (EV) charging station/parking area per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.3. 37. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the precise grading and drainage plan shall follow the format provided in the City of Rancho Cucamonga handout "Information for Grading Plans and Permit". 38. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the applicant shall show on the site plan and the permitted grading plan set for non-residential projects the designated parking for clean air vehicles per the current adopted California Green Building Standards Code, section 5.106.5.2. 39. The preliminary water quality management plan shows a "Bio" detail as 6" perforated PVC outlet drain, this is commonly referred to a bio-retention system with an underdrain. Show the outlet from this system to a storm drain. If the system only uses the outlet riser to outlet the water from the "Bio" system, then this system is a bog which may cause a vector nuisance issue and prior to the approval of the WQMP the applicant coordinate a review by the West Valley Vector and Mosquito Control District for their input on the proposed BMP. Standard Conditions of Approval 1. Surveillance cameras (number to be determined prior to final occupancy in coordination with Police Department) shall be installed a combination of interior and exterior to the business, with the intent to capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security cameras. 2. Video recordings of surveillance cameras shall be nothing less than NTSC (National Television System Committee, the NTSC is the analog video color format used to broadcast television signals) standards, with a minimum of 1080p resolution. A minimum of 90 days surveillance video shall be kept and relinquished upon request by the city of Rancho Cucamonga, The Sheriff's Department, or a designated agent. The applicant(s) or on-site manager(s) shall maintain the recording system and cameras in working condition. 3. The applicant or on-site manager(s), shall post a prominent, permanent sign stating, "NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES" in place that is clearly visible to patrons of the premises. The sign shall fit the requirements as set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga. www.CityofRC.us Page 660 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 14 of 15 Project#: DRC2020-00138 DRC2020-00087, DRC2020-00459, SUBTPM20164 Project Name: EDR - 7-Eleven Archibald & 9th Location: 8768 ARCHIBALD AVE - 020903235-0000 Project Type: Minor Design Review Conditional Use Permit, Public Convenience & Necessity, Tentative Parcel Map ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT: Standard Conditions of Approval 4. The business shall have an alarm system active and monitored by an alarm company who is able to contact law enforcement if a problem occurs within the business. 5. Applicant or on-site manager, shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licenses premises. 6. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. The exterior lighting shall be maintained in working condition by the applicant or on-site property manager. www.CityofRC.us Page 663 Printed:5/6/2021 g Page 15 of 15 -� 57fis1t.�,� • r r �. 7i„�.f} x F � 4 �i_ � �. ,,,,, Arco Gas Stationi ►. �S • t w �m I _ ail _ F- ,f F Othlll B1v POW -'� Chevron Stationyk4�•v , •I�'hl ' _ _ I � 1� " �" Y YY. k Liquor -- - tt * 'r ft/i'iq • Cam' C ��C'� - Cad::r-aroy���'b f•,+"._ r .. a�psh m— y a Str• I•i � rT �- �'�j, .r r �' �, r �v� n;; • Il�r: I�� _. �i. s• �m�l;Ii ; �' r _ y � C-ies�ca=Ct. ' _���•' �+a1'.a1ti,9. �i `� 1? _ �' ." :;y � ram• -+ ��ii r,� F ���Y. '�s •� Y� �_ ry.,i:r. '�, �• m It .o ,•: w■ Illp. r, �,.��x..•" ,y �, 1i(1 a � ^•, � �� •� � "� a q .. m �'4' ¢ � �� t s. �.. � Norfolk r.`m 4�, � n•Lezf l)r f V44 .w1 I µ o.,� v _ oo Sl, ' l ti r =~ 1• M ! w. s: 'i ', �� �f 1ortdav'� ��w ;a�,� � i�l��dr�J I, - O� .p,. � � s' 'r - • � .a._ �.w ��N• ;� 1.e�.�'';.. ,s r`}' •rs } i9.�iig1•i•'s��gpi �F��NF }.� �,�,,�'1 � ^aa 1.•�3f „� •�++ - �#6 Arrow/Arch ' HI rMi: liill ,yY.�ti *' iw -° 'I' �1. � ��.aw-ky',It_•le��Py =k: o'end u Station(approved o ay;ice . ,t• D �. be �. A ='•- i Plaee IHII���''Ia,. t'F4 i+�'\ f" � F,� „� I � , r : • '. � � � i a'i,i►'�i i F '`�� ��� . -,••s ��f� ! � ,+ �� T m . � F � i vim'• m � � ,' � s� ' F nlrt � Wx--��. ^l�a;�1� -`• �:\ +y,k1;�/fir� '..d�`��rFr- �' �.. �iS�' '!. ���,,,f. •i x y a= � � �tii�l •1 l4o,Ty+ti. �K. '� k�� � ,a ;•:��-+r�r•.r �.'- r{ � ~r m� `' � - m�' -.a� sp� •:7l twat ;�, �' E � m .rJr? o''�ti'�'a+ •f��`� F - 'i���'e � ee �rr �r�iw .'� r• �s-yP' Easy Shop Market • 1 it,l, a a �i - - — Arr• o le- JL �� 8usinessm�en�e•l7� :.,r_ �p — `` w AL Station76 Gas "� �S '��. � P��� � � I - • ��x ?��'� �'� S � T('�d •�L'I 4neyrSt a ' } r • �� U ■ x P e 6rest Pr_ �` -. _ "" All �w r 41 ,I� 4 I I I ' I '�i � 1. 1 1 1 • • ' r ¢ - m• F �t I I I 7L �L..r� , r --z ;-J Attacht 3 fill �� L- I ■I 1 '� .ir.-' �2G2 0� B Am Uig ,� , ; F C _ o • o ,�,_ 7,ih+SF F '1 ;{��r� k iwAi i�•I �' 1 �'ry �E'dely,,e yL r F +u {� li .'a 37 a r y F� � -�.� r4zjl�, '4 L. � a �N .• � Yl.f�•�, y arJ^����'��.+ ��{, ry it lF�fr�, _r�- .r 1 i �+�' t� � r Wit, .4 t4- .*!F" �•�`�u. 1.{-A sr 5 3.,lal. k, A � • # i r t ti 1f 1 LL Attachment 4 &'k y a This publication was developed by the Riverside University Health System - Public Health.Thank you to the contributors: Michael Osur, MBA, Miguel Vazquez, AICP, Salomeh Wagaw MPH. A list of partners who helped shaped this checklist can be found on the following page. Suggested Citation: Riverside University Health System - Public Health. Healthy Development Checklist, 2017. Page 756 The Healthy Development Checklist was commissioned by the Riverside University Health System-Public Health and produced by Raimi +Associates. The project was funded with a BEYOND grant from the Western Riverside Council of Governments and produced in collaboration with the San Bernardino Council of Governments. We wish to thank the following organizations and individuals for providing their valuable feedback on this checklist: American Planning Association, California Chapter, Inland Empire Section-John Hildebrand California Baptist University- Marshare Penny ChangeLab Solutions- Eric Calloway City of Coachella- Louis Lopez City of Rancho Cucamonga-John Gillison City ofJurupa Valley- Laura Roughton CityofPalm Desert- Lauri Aylaian & Ryan Stendell City of Riverside-AI Zelinka City ofVictorville- Michael Szarzynski Claremont Graduate School- Kimberly Morones Coachella Valley Association of Governments- LeGrand Velez Health Assessment and Research for Communities- Jenna LeComte-Hinely Lewis-San Antonio Healthy Communities Institute- Angelica Baltazar National Community Renaissance-Alexa Washburn Partners for Better Health- Evette d e Luca Prevention Institute- Rachel Bennett Public Health Alliance-Carla Blackwater San Bernardino County Public Health Department- Corwin Porter,Trudy Raymundo&Scott Rigsby San Bernardino County Land Use Services-Tom Hudson, Karen Watkins, & Linda Mawby San Bernardino Council of Governments -Josh Lee Transportation&Land Management Agency- Steve Weiss Western Riverside County of Governments-Jennifer Ward &Andrea Howard Page 757 The Healthy Development Checklist is intended to help communities across the region incorporate health into everyday life. It is a major step forward in Riverside County's(also known as the Riverside University Health System)continuing drive to build healthy communities. Beginning in 2011, with the adoption of the Healthy Communities Element as part of the County's General Plan and the Healthy Riverside County Resolution, we have continued to encourage the inclusion of health in planning and transportation policy in the County and in its 28 cities.' The Checklist has also garnered the support of regional partners, including the San Bernardino County Transportation Authority and Western Riverside Council of Governments. Both of these partners are working with Riverside County to promote a broader use of this Health Development Checklist, including in San Bernardino County. An overarching principle in the Healthy Development Checklist is Equity. Health equity is ensuring that all people have full and equal access to opportunities that enable them to lead healthy lives.This approach to health equity has informed the content and strategies in the Healthy Development Checklist. EEngagement and Empowerment. All of us must work collectively to ensure our communities are engaged in the planning process.We must empower our constituents to be engaged in decision-making by providing accurate, easy to understand and timely information. Engagement and Empowerment of our communities allows for inclusion and a higher sense of buy-in. Quality. We must ensure that our communities are built to the highest quality possible.This means keeping healthy communities as the focus and ensuring that where people live, work, play and learn provides them with opportunities to build health into their everyday life. U Utilization. How we utilize our limited resources is essential to ensure we can serve our growing population. We must build complete streets that encourage active transportation, healthy eating and active living. Increase healthy behaviors. We must build our communities so that there is easy access to parks, open spaces, recreational activities, shopping,jobs and educational opportunities. Healthy behaviors lead to lower morbidity and mortality rates thereby, improving and extending an overall quality of I ife. TTransportation. The provision of active transportation infrastructure for walking, biking and access to transit ensures greater healthy options for our residents. Y Youth. By building healthy communities where youth can thrive and grow with clean air, water, access to healthy foods, parks and active transportation we can increase the opportunities for our children to live a healthier life. ' For additional information on community health data in Riverside County,you can visit SHAPE Riverside County. Page 758 HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CHECKLIST & CRITERIA The design of our communities has a great impact on our health and the well-being of our residents. This checklist provides criteria, empirical evidence, and best practices for new healthy development. Our goal is to encourage developers, city officials, and decision makers to use this tool to help guide the development of neighborhoods that promote physical and mental health, encourage community engagement, and improve quality of life for all. Community members may also find this tool as a useful resource to better understand healthy development practices. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST? The Healthy Development Checklist was developed to provide criteria for healthy development practices in the Inland Empire. It is intended to be used as a tool to judge the overall health performance and supportiveness of new development projects.While not every criterion will apply to every development project, projects should aim to comply with as many of the criteria as possible to promote health through their development project. HOW TO USE THE CHECKLIST? The Healthy Development Checklist is organized into six topical categories: 1) Active Design 2) Connectivity 3) Public Safety 4) Environmental Health 5) Community Cohesion 6) Access to Food, Services, and Jobs A summary checklist is followed by a more detailed catalogue of the checklist. For each checklist question, projects can assess their performance as follows: • "COMPLIES WITH ALL CRITERIA"(if a project meets all criteria) • "COMPLIES WITH SOME CRITERIA"(if the project meets some, but not all of the bulleted criteria) • "DOES NOT COMPLY"(if the project does not meet any of the criteria) • "N/A"(if the criteria does not apply to this project) WHO SHOULD USE THE CHECKLIST? Developers, planning staff, and decision-makers should use the Healthy Development Criteria: • Developers should refer to the criteria and checklist as a guide for the design and planning of a project in the early stages, preferably before submitting an application for development review. • City staff can use the checklist to review development proposals and make recommendations to both developers and decision-makers.The checklist can also be used to inform staff reports and public meetings on projects. • Decision-makers are encouraged to use the completed project checklist to better understand the health outcomes of a proposed project. • Community members and advocates can use the checklist as a resource and tool to guide healthy development in their communities. Checklist I Page 5 Page 759 SUMMARY CHECKLIST Complies with Complies with Does not N/A ACTIVE DESIGN all criteria some criteria comply 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project support access to neighborhood amenities (e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community center, caf6, etc.) within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project incorporate attractive, pedestrian-scale exteriors ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ walkability by providing a highly-connected street network? 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ provide all residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? Checklist I Page 6 Page 760 Complies with Complies with Does not N/A PUBLIC SAFETY all criteria some criteria comply 11. INJURY PREVENTION. How well does the project foster injury prevention through the use of traffic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ calming features, such as bulb outs and speed humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and moderate roadway speeds? 12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate safe access to schools within a reasonable walking distance? 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 14. SMOKING. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project incorporate efforts to protect residents from ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ the harmful effects of high volume roads? 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mitigate noise pollution for all residents? 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? COMMUNITY COHESION 19. PASSIVE SPACES. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate spaces that facilitate social engagement? 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate facilities and access to a variety of recreational opportunities for all users? 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ incorporate facilities and access to a multi-purpose community space accessible to the public? Checklist Page 7 Page 761 ies ies ACCESS TO FOOD, JOBS, AND SERVICES Callnc�rliteriaith somelc iteiah compy N/A 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ access to a full-service grocery store (e.g., sells meat, dairy, fruits and vegetables) within reasonable walking distance of all residents? 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ project incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens, edible landscaping, or small-scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? 24. FARMER'S MARKET. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ designate space or provide access to a farmer's market within a reasonable walking distance? 25. HEALTHY FOOD. How well does the project ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? 26. JOBS. How well does the project design promote ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ shorter commutes and better access to jobs? 27. HEALTH SERVICES. How well does the project provide future residents with access to health ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ services? 28. CHILDCARE. How well does the project support ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ increased access to affordable and high-quality childcare? 29. MIXED-USE. How well does the project integrate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ mixed-use development? 30. MIXED HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to a mix of housing options that will allow ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? Checklist I Page 8 Page 762 DETAILED HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ACTIVE DESIGN 1. NEIGHBORHOOD AMENITIES. How well does the project support access to neighborhood ' amenities(e.g., convenience store, dry cleaning, community center, caf6, etc.)within reasonable walking distance from residential developments? RATIONALE: Neighborhoods that include destinations within reasonable walking distance are linked to increased total physical activity of residents. A"walk shed" radius is a useful measure to delineate the area from which a place is reachable by a short walk, commonly understood as up to one half mile.' An effective circulation system links people to key neighborhood destinations efficiently and safely. CRITERIA: • Review the project for the following features: • Access to one or more existing or planned transit stops(including bus, streetcar, informal transit stop, rapid transit, light or heavy rail stations, commuter rail stations)within a 'z mile walk distance;and • At least two destinations within a %mile walking distance of all or most residents, including , parks, schools, commercial centers, and offices. EVIDENCE: - Congress for New Urbanism.2001. 'Ped Sheds."Transportation Tech Sheet.Retrieved from: • http.//cnu.civicactions.net/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU Ped Sheds.pdf Frumkin,H.and L.Frank,R.Jackson.2004.Urban Sprawl and Public Health:Designing,Planning,and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington,DC:Island Press. Klingerman M.and J.Sallis,S.Ryan,L.Frank,P.Nader.2007. 'Association ofneighborhood design and recreation , environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents."American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4).•274-77. Mouzon,S.2012. "Walk Appeal."Better Cities and Towns.Retrieved from:http.•//bettercities.nednews-opinion/blogs/steve- ' mouzon/18645/walk-appeal 2. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE. How well does the project incorporate a park or open space within reasonable walking distance of all residential development? - RATIONALE: The close proximity of parks and recreation services encourages use, physical activity, and mental health benefits for people of all ages. Parks can also be used as spaces for community events and civic engagement. People living within a half mile of a park consider facilities close enough to walk to. - ' For the purposes ofthis Checklist,any references to a"reasonable walking distance"should consider the walk shed as a measure for walkability and also the best applicability to the local community context(e.g., urban, - suburban, rural).While practical influences should always be considered(e.g., safety,shortcuts, etc.), projects • should aim for at least a'/z mile walk distance, but a'/a mile walk distance is preferred. • Active Design I Page 9 - Page 763 ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features.• • Every resident lives within '2 of park or public open space;and • A ratio of at least 5 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents;and • Joint-use agreements with local school districts or other entities(if necessary, to achieve these park standards.) EVIDENCE: Louv,Richard.2008.Last Child in the Woods.New York:Algonquin Books. Trust for Public Land.2016. 'Parks on the Clock:Why we Believe in the 10-minute walk."Retrieved from: https.//www.tpl.org/blog/why-the-10-minute-walk#5m.0001 boOtOr4t 1 d50von 1 fn8ldyt 18 Westrup,L.2002. "Quimby Act 101:An Abbreviated Overview."California Department of Parks and Recreation.Retrieved from:https.//www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/quimbyl01.pdf 3. PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT. How well does the project contribute to creating a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment for residents of all ages? RATIONALE: Walking is positively correlated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Perceptions matter:the extent to which a neighborhood is perceived as walkable is correlated with residents' likelihood of participating in regular physical activity. A quality pedestrian environment also creates a physical and psychological buffer between pedestrians, bikes and cars, in addition to providing shade.A carefully planned built environment can be highly effective in preventing pedestrian injuries. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Pedestrian signals, in-pavement flashing lights, four-way stops, crosswalks, and/or pedestrian overpasses to ensure pedestrian safety and • Gently sloped walks instead of or in addition to steps in public open spaces;and • Barrier-free paths that facilitate access for all users;and ' • Legible signage that minimizes confusion and communicates important wayfinding information to all users(e.g., seniors, deaf, multi-language),-and • • Street trees planted between the vehicle travel way and sidewalk at intervals of no more than 50 feet along at least 60%of the total existing and planned block length within a project and on blocks bordering the project;and • Within ten years, shade from trees or permanent structures over at least 40 0 of the total • length of the existing and planned sidewalks within or bordering the project(measured from the estimated crown diameter). • EVIDENCE: Retting,R.A.,and A. T.McCaln S.A.Ferguson.2003. '4 review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes."American Journal of Public Health 93(9),• 1456-1462. •Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative. 'Best Practices for Complete Streets."Retrieved from. https.//www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/cs/resources/cs-bestpractices-sacramento.pdf U.S. Green Building Council.2016.LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development Retrieved from: • http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version • • Active Design I Page 10 Page 764 , 4. SIDEWALKS. How well does the project create or contribute to a complete network of sidewalks? RATIONALE: The presence of a complete sidewalk network is a major determinant of whether or not someone may choose walking for any given trip.Walking is positively correlated with the presence of sidewalks and perceived neighborhood aesthetics and safety. Lack of physical activity is a major factor in Americans' health.The provision of a network that facilitates walking can help bridge this physical activity gap and directly influence measurable health indicators. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Sidewalks on both sides of all new and redeveloped streets;and • Minimum sidewalk width of feet along residential streets and 8 feet along commercial or mixed-use streets;and • Continuous sidewalks across the entire project street network(excepting alleys and service-oriented streets),-and • Incorporation of universal design features to ensure that all users(including those using • wheelchairs, walkers,pushing strollers, and hand carts)can easily travel to neighborhood destinations, including: o Multi-use pathways that are separated from vehicular traffic and that facilitate pedestrian and wheelchair access, o Planting strips on both sides ofall streets without protruding into the path of travel- and ' o Short right-turn radii for major roads and ramps crossing pedestrian rights-of-way. EVIDENCE: • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.2011.A Policy on Geometric Design of High ways and Streets. Washington,DC.-American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Boodlal,L.2003. 'Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings-an informational guide."US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.Retrieved from:http.//www.bikewalk.org/pdfs/sopada fhwa.pdf 5. FRONTAGE DESIGN. How well does the project incorporate attractive, pedestrian-scale exteriors and massing to encourage walkability for people of all ages? RATIONALE: • Building design greatly affects our sense of comfort while walking, biking, or driving, as well as our connection to a place and our neighbors. Providing opportunities to have frequent face-to-face contact in a neighborhood has been shown to promote social ties among neighbors.Architectural • features such as porches and transparent shop fronts that promote visibility from a building's exterior have been linked to higher levels of perceived social support and lower levels of • psychological distress. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Buildings with primary entrances oriented towards the sidewalk/street or public open spaces;and Active Design I Page 11 Page 765 ' • Buildings that are scaled appropriately to the width of the street to create a pleasant public realm environment(generally using a rule of thumb of at least 1 foot of building height for every 1.5 feet from street centerline to building facade),,and • Surface parking is located behind buildings(or to the side in certain contexts). EVIDENCE: 11 ChangeLab Solutions.(n.d.)'Pedestrian Friendly Code Directory:Eyes on the Street."Retrieved from: ' http.//www.changelabsolutions.org/childhood-obesity/eyes-street Lund,Hollie.2002. Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community."Journal of Planning Education and Research.21 (3):301-312. Speck,J.2012. Walkable City How Downtown can Save America,One Step at a Time.New York:North Point Press. Wekerly, G.2000. 'From Eyes on the Street to Safe Cities."Places 13(l):44-49. 6. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY.How well does the project incorporate design features to promote the physical activity of all building occupants? • RATIONALE: Certain features can be incorporated into the design of buildings that help people increase their physical activity as a part of daily life.Active design strategies include the convenient placement of stairs, building and site design to encourage walking, and the provision of spaces for physical activity. ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Placement of stairs within 25'ofan entrance and before any elevator; • Stair prompts and signage at elevator banks; • Windows&skylights to make enclosed stairs more visible and appealing; • No unnecessary escalators and elevators; • Elimination ofphysical barriers(such as walls, door locks, and poor placement of building elements)that can deter physical activity. EVIDENCE: , Center for Active Design.2010. 'Active Design Guidelines:Promoting Physical Activity and Health In Design."City of New York. • • Active Design Page 12 Page 766 , CONNECTIVITY 7. NETWORK. How well does the project leverage public open space, sidewalks, pedestrian amenities, bicycle facilities, and multi-use trails to connect safely and comfortably to surrounding neighborhoods? RATIONALE: Research indicates that children who bike or walk to recreational sites(parks, playgrounds, etc.) use sites more often.The safer it is to bike or walk to play sites,the more likely it is that kids will bike or walk there. Furthermore,trail use is significantly correlated with user proximity, with evidence showing that trails within at least 1/2 mile of every residence is ideal for maximizing access and use.Trails and parks that are well maintained, safe, clean, well-lit, and have facilities, such as restrooms, drinking fountains, and exercise equipment, are used more and contribute to higher physical activity levels among users. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Pedestrian amenities at parks and on trails, including seating, restrooms, signage, lighting, landscaping, shade structure, trash cans and drinking fountains;and • Park design that emphasizes connectivity to other park/trail access points within reasonable walking distance, including complete streets design, close proximity to transit stops, and safe pedestrian and bike routes. EVIDENCE: Kaczynski,A.and K.Henderson.2007. 'Environmental correlates ofphysical activity:a review of evidence aboutparks and • recreation."Leisure Sciences 29(4):315-354. National Center for Environmental Health.2013.Parks and Trails Health lmpactAssessment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Retrieved from:https.•//www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/parks trails/sectionc.htm#1 Shulaker,B.and J.lsacoff, T.Kjer,and K.Hart.2016.Park Design for Physical Activity and Health.San Francisco:Trust for Public Land. 8. WALKABILITY. How well does the project enhance walkability by providing a highly-connected street network? RATIONALE: There is ample evidence that greater street connectivity and higher residential density are related to higher total physical activity and lower BMI.Adults are more likely to walk if they live in neighborhoods with high connectivity and intersection density, high population density, and a mix • of land uses. A high intersection density is one of the single most important variables for determining whether a • place will have high enough levels of connectivity to foster increased levels of walking, as well as for increasing transit use and reducing vehicle distance traveled. Grid street patterns that decrease distance between destinations encourage walking and help foster physical activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: Connectivity Page 13 Page 767 , • No cul-de-sacs, courts, and paseos without through access by pedestrians and bicyclists to otherstreets, courts,paseos, orparks; • An internal connectivity of at least 140 motorized/non-motorized intersections per square mile;and • Small, walkable blocks with perimeters no more than 1600 feet long;and • At least one through connection(street, alley, trail/path)of all blocks and the project boundary every 800 feet. Does not apply to blocks or portions of the boundary where ' connections cannot be made due to physical obstacles. EVIDENCE: Frank L,Schmid T,Sallis l Chapman J,Saelens B.2005. "Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form:findings from SMARTRAQ."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28:117-125. Stangl,P.2015 'Block size-based measures ofstreet connectivity:A Critical Assessment and new approach."Urban Design Internationa120(l),- 1-12. U.S. Green Building Council.2016.LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development.Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version 9. TRANSIT ACCESS. How well does the project provide all residents with safe access to transit and transit facilities within reasonable walking distance? RATIONALE: In addition to walking and biking, public transit offers a potential alternative to driving. Public transit improvements can also result in other benefits, including reduced traffic crashes, improved physical fitness and health, energy conservation, increased community livability, increased affordability, and economic development. Urban form, including the presence of compact development and access to public transit,tend to have a positive association with physical activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • At least 50%of dwelling units and nonresidential use entrances have access to existing or planned transit stops(including bus, streetcar, informal transit stop, rapid transit, light or hea vy rail stations, commuter rail stations)within a '/z mile walk distance;and • Compact development and mixed land use that maximizes walkable access to public transit, and • • Transit facilities designed to maximize user comfort while waiting by incorporating shade structures, street furniture and relevant information/signage. EVIDENCE: • En American Public Transportation Association.2009. 'Defining Areas of Influence."(Recommended Practice).Retrieved from: ' http.•//www.apta.com/resources/standards/Documents/APTA%20SUDS-UD-RP-001-09.pdf • Convergence Partnership.2006.Healthy,Equitable Transportation Policy.Retrieved from: http.//www.convergencepartnership.org/sites/default/files/healthtrans fullbook final.PDF Forsyth,A.and L.Smead(Eds.).2015.Mobility,Universal Design,Health,and Place(A Research Brief).Health and Places Initiative.Retrieved from:http.//research.gsd.harvard.edu/hapi/files/2015/11/HAPI ResearchBrief UniversalDesign- • 112315.pdf Litman, T.2010. 'Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits."American Public Transportation Association.Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/APTA_Health Benefits Litman.pdf • Connectivity I Page 14 • Page 768 ' 10. BICYCLE CONNECTIVITY. How well does the project provide high levels of bicycle connectivity through a safe, well-marked and complete bicycle network? RATIONALE: Good bicycle connectivity and safe bicycle facilities can have dramatic public health benefits. New , bicycling facilities can dramatically lower health care costs. Additionally, communities that support transit use, walking, and bicycling are associated with more physical activity and lower body weights. Key metrics to the success of bicycle networks is trail/bikeway accessibility. Use of trails and bikeways is negatively correlated with distance to the facility. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • On-street bicycle facilities(Class 11 or Class IV)on most streets;and • Class W facilities on limited access roadways with higher rates of speed and larger intersection spacing;and ' • Highly visible or color-coded markings and/or bicycle lane striping on the road surface(or a painted buffer between the bicycle and travel lanes).;and • Where appropriate, 'bicycle boulevards"with narrower travellanes, slower targetspeeds, unique signage, and bicycle prioritization through vehicle barriers or other visual cues. EVIDENCE: Gotsch; T.2011. 'Costs&Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland,Oregon."Journal of Physical Activity&Health 8(1).- 549-558. ' Handy,S.L.2004.Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation,Land Use,and Physical Activity. Washington,DC.-Transportation Research board andInstitutes of Medicine Committee on Physica/Activity,Health Transportation,and Land Use. PucherJ,and J.Dill,and S.Handy.2010. "Infrastructure,programs,and policies to increase bicycling:an international • review."Preventive Medicine 50: 106-25. Ln Connectivity Page 15 , Page 769 ' PUBLIC SAFETY 11. INJURY PREVENTION.How well does the project foster injury prevention through the use of traffic calming features, such as bulb outs and speed humps, safe pedestrian crossings, and moderate roadway speeds? RATIONALE: Vehicle speed is one of the most critical variables that determines traffic collision severity.The use of design features that moderate traffic speeds and increase driver awareness of bicycle and pedestrian activity all help to reduce the occurrence and severity of injury of collisions. This is especially true for those with limited mobility, such as elderly pedestrians and children. Risk of injury is also greater on busier streets and streets with more than two lanes. However, pedestrian safety can be improved through the provision of continuous wide sidewalks, well-marked and signalized crosswalks,traffic controls at intersections; and traffic-calming infrastructure. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • • Traffic-calming infrastructure, such as speed humps, ,bulb-outs, and chicanes,-and • To the extent possible, neighborhood/local streets have a target speed limit of20 miles per hour and collectors/arterials have a target speed limit of30 miles per hour,-and • All vehicle travel lanes on local streets within the project area are no wider than 10 feet,• collector streets and roads are no wider than 11 feet,-and arterial roads have travel lanes no wider than 12 feet,-and • All two-lane streets have clearly marked space for on-street parking and/or bicycle lanes,- and _ • Outside lane striping to delineate the vehicle travel way from on-street parking, bicycle lanes, or unused shoulders,-and • Grade-separated cycle tracks OR wide parking lanes(up to 10 feet)where physical separation between bicycle lanes and on-street parking is not desirable or possible, such as in areas with high parking turnover. EVIDENCE: Koepsel% T.2002. "Crosswalk markings and the risk ofpedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in olderpedestrians."The Journal of the American Medical Association 288(17):2136-2143. , National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington,DC.-Island Press. Zegeer,C.2001. Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations."Transportation Research • Record(1773):56-68. 12. SAFE ACCESS TO SCHOOLS.How well does the project incorporate safe access to schools • within reasonable walking distance? • RATIONALE: The implementation of safe routes to school strategies have resulted in significant decreases in the number of child pedestrian deaths and injury rates.Additionally, improved safety for students walking and biking to school also has broader benefits, including reduced transportation costs, increased connectivity between neighborhoods, and improved student alertness. Public Safety I Page 16 Page 770 ' CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • An attendance,boundary that adheres to these specified distances:most or all students living within a 3/4-mile walking distance forgrades 8 and below, and 1 1/2-mile walking distance forgrades 9 and above, of school building. EVIDENCE: , Boarnet,MG,and CL Anderson,K.Day, T.McMillan,M.Alfonzo.2005. 'Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation:urban form changes and children's active transportation to school."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2): 134-40. National Center for Safe Routes to School.2015.Creating Healthier Generations:A Look at the 10 Years of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program.Retrieved from:http.•//saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS 10YearReport Final pdf U.S. Green Building Council.(n.d)LEED BD+C.•Schools.Access to Quality Transit.Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/credits/schools-new-construction/v4-draft/ltc5 13. LIGHTING. How well does the project provide adequate neighborhood lighting to prevent crime and increase safety? RATIONALE: Street lighting improvements can help reduce both crime and people's perceptions of fear. In addition, street lighting can have the effect of increasing activity after dark. , CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Lighting that enhances visibility of streets, alleys, windows, walkways, and bikeways for pedestrians and vehicle traffic;and • Safe pedestrian path zones that align with traffic patterns and generate a sense of welcome at all hours of the day;and • Enough lighting for safety, while ensuring lighting does not produce glare for users, including pedestrians, drivers, or light trespass to neighbors. EVIDENCE: ' IESNA Security Lighting Committee.2003. 'Guideline for Security Lighting for People,Property,and Public Spaces."New York:Illuminating Engineering Society ofAmerica. � Painter,K. 1996. "The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime,Fear,and Pedestrian Street Use,after dark." Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2-3): 193-201. Ln cu Public Safety Page 17 Page 771 � ' ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH -'AOKING. How well does the project incorporate efforts to restrict smoking in multi-family development and open spaces? RATIONALE: Each year, smoking causes about one in five deaths in the United States. Smoking continues to be an ongoing health issue and is one of concern in the Inland Empire. Furthermore,there is extensive evidence that indicates second hand smoke, especially in shared spaces, such as multifamily residential buildings, can be a health hazard for non-smokers in adjoining units. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • No smoking in parks and public plazas, and • Signage stating smoking bans in parks and public plazas, and • Restrict smoking in multifamily residential buildings so as to protect tenants from the effects ofsecondhand smoke generated in nearby or adjoining units. EVIDENCE: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.2014. 'Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking."Smoking and Tobacco Use,Data and Statistics,Fact Sheets.Retrieved from:http.//www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data-statistics/fact sheets/health-effects/effects cig smoking/ 15. NEAR-ROAD POLLUTION. How well does the project incorporate efforts to protect residents from the harmful effects of high volume roads? RATIONALE: Pollutants from cars,trucks and other motor vehicles are found in higher concentrations near major roads. People who live, work or attend school near major roads appear to have an increased incidence and severity of health problems associated with air pollution exposures related to roadway traffic, including higher rates of asthma onset and aggravation, cardiovascular disease, impaired lung development in children, pre-term and low-birthweight infants, childhood leukemia, and premature death. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Near-road landscaping that reduces particle concentrations and noise. Generally, include a context-appropriate vegetation barrier that is at least20 feet and has full coverage(no gaps),-and • Locate homes at least 1,000 away from a high-volume road;and • Install filtration systems for all buildings within 1,000 feet of high-volume road EVIDENCE: California Department of Education.2015.Sustainable Communities and School Planning.Retrieved from: • http.//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf California Environmental Protection Agency.2017.Strategies to Reduce Air Pollution Exposure Near High-Volume Roadways.Retrieved from:haps.//www.arb.ca.gov/ch/rd technical advisor final • Environmental Health I Page 18 Page 772 , 16. NOISE POLLUTION. How well does the project mitigate noise pollution for all residents? RATIONALE: Noise pollution can negatively impact the physical and mental health of residents. Unwanted noise may increase due to population growth, street traffic changes, and even mobile technology. Long ' term exposure to excessive noise can lead to stress,fatigue, hearing loss, and loss of productivity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Active rooms, such as kitchens,placed in locations that buffer sounds from roads in rooms where noise is more problematic, such as bedrooms;and • Minimize exposure to noise pollution in outdoor spaces by planting earthen berms with grasses or shrubs;and • Use ofgreen roofs, which can absorb noise and reduce outside sound levels by up to 40- 50 decibels;and • Reduce exposure to noise pollution for building occupants by incorporating acoustically designed walls, double-glazed windows, and well-sealed doors. EVIDENCE: Brophy, V.and JO Lewis.2011.A Green Vitruvius.London:Earthscan. Kryter,K. 1994.The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise:Physiology,Psychology,and Public Health.San Diego: Academic Press. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.(n.d.)'Environmental Health."Healthy People 2020.Retrieved from: https./lwww.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic%nvironmental-health 17. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE.How well does the project mitigate any impacts that would disproportionately affect disadvantaged communities? RATIONALE: The negative impacts of the built environment disproportionately impact disadvantaged communities, including higher incidences of respiratory disease, cancer, obesity, and developmental diseases. Community design,together with planning decisions, can play a key role in making these communities healthier and mitigating the impacts of existing land use patterns and transportation investments in the region. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Minimize exposure to hazardous contaminants, including contaminated soils,pesticides, contaminated groundwater, and emissions by not siting residential development near or in the path of exposure sites(e.g., bus fleets stations, factories,powerplants, landfills, and areas ofpesticide spraying) 0 • Minimize development of sensitive land uses-defined as schools, hospitals, residences, and elder and childcare facilities-near air pollution sources-including freeways, high volume roads, airplane landing paths, and polluting industrial sites. EVIDENCE: California Department of Education.2015 Sustainable Communities and School Planning.Retrieved from: http.•//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf _ Environmental Health I Page 19 Page 773 1 Environmental Protection Agency.2016. "Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis." Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-06/documents/ejtg 5 6 16 v5.l.pdf 5rinivasan,5.and L.O Fallon,A.Dearry.2003. 'Creating Healthy Communities,Healthy Homes,Healthy People:Initiating a Research Agenda on the Built Environment and Public Health."American Journal of Public Health 93(9).• 1446-1450. 18. INDOOR AIR QUALITY. How well does the project incorporate the use of materials and products that support healthy indoor quality? RATIONALE: Poor indoor quality can contribute to chronic disease, including asthma, heart disease, and cancer. Poor ventilation, humidity, and exposure to carbon monoxide can exacerbate negative impacts to health. Most exposure to environmental pollutants occurs by breathing air indoors. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Building materials that are not known to emit harmful toxins;and • Reduce occupant exposure to VOCs by using cabinetry, doors, molding, shelving, and trim materials with low VOCs. Employ caulking, adhesives,paints, varnishes, and other finishes that are free of solvents and V005;and • Reduce occupant exposure to molds by using mold resistant materials in community bathrooms and other water sensitive locations. EVIDENCE: American Lung Association.(n.d). Healthy Air at Home."Retrievedfrom:http.//www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy- air/indoor/at-home/ Environmental Protection Agency.(n.d). "Improving Indoor Air Quality."Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/indoor-air- • quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality CE Environmental Health Page 20 Page 774 , COMMUNITY1 1 19. PASSIVE SPAutb. How well does the project incorporate spaces that facilitate social engagement? RATIONALE: Creating public spaces that promote the engagement of residents and high connectivity of neighborhoods and services have positive impacts on health.The good design of public spaces is important to ensuring not only their use, but the encouragement of socialization and activity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Plazas, a central square, dog runs, and bbq areas that encourage social interaction and enhance opportunities for physical activity and • Seating that encourages people to be comfortable in parks and public spaces;and • Design that promotes public gathering and use of open space for activities,places for food, and flexibility for multiple uses, including: o Visible and accessible entrances, spaces, and paths, o Functional structures, o Pedestrian and bicyclist access, o Public art, o Close access to public transit. EVIDENCE: ' Eitler, Thomas W.,E.T.McMahon,and T.C.Thoeng.2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington,D.C.: Urban Land Institute. • Project for Public Spaces.2009. Why Public Spaces Fail.Retrieved from:http://www.pps.org/reference/failedplacefeat/ 20. RECREATIONAL SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to a ' variety of recreational opportunities for all users? RATIONALE: Having accessible recreation, exercise, or sports facilities in neighborhoods tends to be associated with active recreation.Additionally, research has shown that children are more physically active in preschools that have more available playground equipment and a larger space for outdoor play. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Sports fields, courts, swimming pools, tot lots,putting green, recreational gardening and fitness facilities, including: o Baseball or softball diamonds, soccer fields, an open playgreen, a skate park, basketball, tennis, sand volleyball, and/or practice fields;or o Swimming pools, which may include an adult lap pool and spa, a children's pool, a splash park;or o Equestrian staging area(if appropriate to the context). • Parks that emphasize open space and natural habitat, have minimal development, and are 6 -0 well distributed throughout the site. Park amenities may include: 0 • 0 -0 Community Cohesion I Page 21 Page 775 UU , o Open lawns o Restrooms o Shade structures o Picnic areas o Interpretive areas and interpretive signage •' • Park facilities for users of all ages with different recreational needs, interests and abilities. Seniors and veryyoung children in particular have unique needs. Consider the following , age-specific park infrastructure: o Very young children(age 0-6):tot lots, splash pads o Older children(6-18).•sports fields, courts, skate park o Adults:sports fields,putting green,gardening and fitness facilities, adult lap pool o Senior(age 60+).•gardening and fitness facilities, adult lap pool, trails EVIDENCE: Bauman,A.E.,and F.C.Bull.Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity and Walking in Adults and Children:A Review of the Reviews.London:National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence.Retrieved from: http.//www.nice.org.uk/nicemedialpcl`f/wor`d/environmenta/%20corre/ates%2Oof%20%physical%activity%20re vie w.pdf ' Harnik,P.and B. Welle.2011.From Fitness Zones to the Medical Mile:How Urban Park Systems Can Best Promote Health • and Wellness. Trust for Public Land Retrieved from:https.•//www.tpl org/sites/default/files/cloudd tpl org/pubs/ccpe-health- promoting parks-rptpdf Ulrich,R.Evidence Based Environmental Design for Improving Medical Outcomes.Retrieved from:http.//muhc- healing.mcgill.ca/english/Speakers/ulrich p.html 21. COMMUNITY SPACES. How well does the project incorporate facilities and access to a multi- , purpose community space accessible to the public? RATIONALE: Adaptable, multi-purpose community rooms can help foster a sense of social cohesion and offer space for education and health related programming. Education and lifelong learning can improve social well-being and help maintain cognitive function as people age. CRITERIA: , Review the project for the following features: • At least one community space in every community and/or neighborhood-and , • Community room with multi-use spaces, including recreational rooms, auditoriums, • outdoor plazas, and green building features;and • Integration of community rooms with parks, open space facilities, and cultural centers. EVIDENCE: • GJ American Society of Landscape Architects.2014. 'Health Benefits of Nature."Professional Practice.Retrieved from: http.//www.asla.org/healthbene/itsofnature.aspx • Eitler, T.and E.McMahon, T. Thoerig.2013.Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places.Washington DC:Urban Land Institute. Community Cohesion Page 22 Page 776 ' ACCESS TO FOOD, SERVICES, AND JOBS 22. GROCERY. How well does the project integrate access to a full-service grocery store(e.g., sells meat, dairy,fruits and vegetables)within reasonable walking distance of all residents? RATIONALE: Residents of communities with access to healthy foods have healthier diets. Proximity to supermarkets is associated with lower rates of obesity and the presence of convenience stores is associated with higher rates of obesity. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • A neighborhood market within the project design, or • A public, multi-use space that allows for food markets, or • Access to a full-service grocery store within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE • Sallis,J.,and Karen Glanz.2009. Physical Activity and Food Environments:Solutions to the Obesity Epidemic."Milbank Quarterly.87(1): 123-154. Wakefield,J.2004. 'Fighting Obesity Through the Built Environment."Environmental Health Perspectives 112(l 1):A616- A618. 23. COMMUNITY GARDEN. How well does the project incorporate space for growing food onsite through community gardens, edible landscaping, or small scale farming within a reasonable walking distance from residential development? RATIONALE: Community gardens provide a whole host of community benefits in addition to serving as an additional source of healthy food. Participation in community gardening is associated with higher fruit and vegetable intake,though, and can be an effective strategy at improving access to healthy foods. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Community gardens in neighborhood parks and residential development as part of project design;or • Joint-use agreements with local school districts or other entities(if necessary to ensure access to a school garden),-or • Access to a communitygarden within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Eitler, Thomas W.,ET McMahon,and T.C.Thoerig.2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington,D.C.: Urban Land Institute. Lovell,S.2010. 'Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States."Sustainability2(8).• • 2499-2522. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 23 Page 777 , 24. FARMER'S MARKET.How well does the project designate space or provide access to a farmer's market within reasonable walking distance? RATIONALE: Proximity to farmer's markets has been found to be associated with lower body mass index(BMI) among youth, while density of fast-food and pizza venues has been found to be associated with higher BMI. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Space included for a farmer's market within project design;or • Access ensured to a farmer's market within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Jilcott,S.B.,and S. Wade,J.T.McGuirt, Q. Wu,S.Lazorick,J.B.Moore.2011. The association between the food ' environment and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth.Public Health Nutrition 14(09): 1610-1617. Leadership for Health Communities.2007 Action Strategies Toolkit. Washington,D.C.:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. 25. HEALTHY FOOD.How well does the project maintain a balance of healthy and unhealthy food retailers? RATIONALE: Peoples'food choices and their likelihood of being overweight or obese are also influenced by their food environment.A popular measure of healthy and less healthy food availability in a given geographic area-including distance to food retailers, cost of foods, or density of food outlets- is the modified Retail Environment Food Index(mREFI), which is a ratio of fast-food restaurants and convenience stores compared to supermarkets, produce markets, and farmer's markets. Presence of fast food retailers has a negative effect on diets and diet related health outcomes. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: , • Restrict fast food retailers within 'z mile of schools, and • Manage the allowance of fast food retailers relative to the ratio of healthy food retailers to unhealthy food retailers. This could be accomplished by utilizing the Modified Retail Environment Food Index Score. Calculate the mREFI, which is calculated for a census tract as(healthy retailers)/(healthy retailers f unhealthy retailers).Areas with a score of less than 5 are considered to have 'poor access"to healthy retail food, scores of to 10 to have fair access,"scores above 10 to 25 to have ';good access,"and scores above 25 to have 'high access.' EVIDENCE: Centers for Disease Control.2011. 'Census Tract Level State Maps of the Modified Retail Food Environment Index(mRFEI). Retrieved from:ftp.//ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/dnpao%ensus-tract-level-state-maps-mrfei TAG508.pdf •Moore L VandA VDiez Roux,JANettleton,DRJacobs,M Franco.2009. 'Fast-food consumption,diet quality,and neighborhood exposure to fast food:the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis."American Journal of Epidemiology 170(1): 29-36. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 24 Page 778 , 26. JOBS.How well does the project design promote shorter commutes and better access to jobs? RATIONALE: Jobs-housing balance is an indirect method of estimating how much commuting future residents of the proposed community might have to endure.While some may find driving enjoyable, , commuting is generally a stressful activity that affects one's health and one's social ties to their community. Extended commutes increase stress, with implications for both mental health and familial relationships. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Design includes more housing nearjob-center areas;or • Includes jobs near housing-dense areas;or • Includes affordable housing between job center areas;or • Creates mixed-use projects that include jobs and housing. EVIDENCE: • California Planning Roundtable.2008. 'Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance."Retrieved from: http.//www.cproundtable.org/media/uploads/pub files/CPR-Jobs-Housing.pdf Frank,LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid.2004. 'Obesity Relationships with Community Design,Physical Activity,and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. Freeman,Lance.2002. "The Effects ofSprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties:An Explanatory Analysis':Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1).•69-77. Koslowsky,M.and A.Kluger,M.Reich. 1995. Commuting stress:causes,effects,and methods of coping.New York.•Plenum • Press. 27. HEALTH SERVICES.How well does the project provide future residents with access to health services? RATIONALE: The inability to access public transit poses a significant barrier for low-income patients to access health care services and can result in missed appointments, avoiding care, and deterioration of health conditions. One method to bridging the gaps in healthcare is by creating clinical- • community partnerships, which can be more cost effective and culturally appropriate in addressing preventive care and population health. CRITERIA: • Review the project for the following features: • Access to a clinic or health facility within reasonable walking distance, or • • Include multi-use spaces that could be used as a health center or to provide health services within the project design. EVIDENCE: • Active Living by Design. Clinical-Community Collaboration Case Examples.Retrieved from: http.//activelivingbydesign.org/resources/clinical-community-collaboration-case-examples/ Access to Food, Jobs, and Services Page 25 ' Page 779 ' Hobson,J.and Julie Quiroz-Martinez.2002.Roadblocks to Health:Transportation Barriers to Healthy Communities. Transportation for Healthy Communities Collaborative.Retrieved from: http.//www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/roadblocks to health 2002.pdf 28. CHILDCARE.How well does the project support increased access to affordable and high quality childcare? RATIONALE: Access to quality childcare is vital to a child's early development and also contributes to important economic benefits, including direct and indirect job benefits, increased tax revenues, and a more productive workforce. Communities, cities, and developers are finding unique ways to partner in supporting child care facilities as part of development projects and land use plans. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: ' • Mixed use development included as part ofproject design;or • • Design of flexible, multi-use spaces that could be used as a child care center;or • Access to a child care center within reasonable walking distance. EVIDENCE: Hodgson,K.2011.Child care and Sustainable Community Development.(American Planning Association Family Friendly Communities Briefing Papers).Retrieved from:https.//www.planning.org/research/family/briefi'ngpapers/childcare.htm Local Investment in Child Care aINCC).2008. 'Building Child Care Into New Developments:A Guide For Creating Child Care Facilities In Transit-Oriented Developments."Retrieved from:http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/ Uploads/200806241inccdevBRweb.pdf • PolicyLinkand the Marguerite Casey Foundation.2016.High-Quality,Affordable Childcare forAll:Good for Families, • Communities,and the Economy.(Issue Brief Series:The Economic Benefits of Equity).Retrieved from: http.//www.policylink.org/sites/default/files/Childcare-for-All-FINAL-05-06-16.pdf 29. MIXED-USE.How well does the project integrate mixed-use development? RATIONALE: There are many different health and wellbeing benefits to living in a mixed-use area.Youths, adults, and seniors residing in neighborhoods with mixed land use typically engage in more total physical activity than those in single-use neighborhoods. Adults are more likely to walk if they live in neighborhoods with high connectivity, high population density, and mixed land use. Additionally, one primary characteristic of a high quality healthy community is mixed land use, • where residents live in proximity to services and amenities, rather than in purely residential environments. • CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: • Neighborhood-serving uses, such as food markets, libraries, dry cleaning services and ,beauty salons within the project design;and • Retail and service uses on the ground floor to entice pedestrians. Access to Food, Jobs, and Services I Page 26 Page 780 , EVIDENCE: Barton,H.and C. Tsourour.2001.Healthy Urban Planning.New York.-Rout/edge. Eitler, T.and E.McMahon, T. Thoerig.2013.Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places.Washington DC:Urban Land Institute. Frank,LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid.2004. Obesity Relationships with Community Design,Physical Actiivty,and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. , Frumkin,H.and L.Frank,R.Jackson.2004. Urban Sprawl and Public Health:Designing,Planning,and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington,DC-Island Press. 30. MIXED-HOUSING. How well does the project contribute to a mix of housing options that will allow all potential household sizes, incomes, and types to become neighbors and share available amenities? RATIONALE: Offering housing that is affordable to local workers is crucial, as a mix of housing that meets a ' diversity of needs and incomes allows diverse professionals to live in the community in which they work.There are ample benefits to having housing that can accommodate local workers, including increased social cohesiveness and a decrease in the amount of driving necessary to support a community. CRITERIA: Review the project for the following features: , • An inclusionary housing requirement, and • Design of multi-generational housing, and • A wide range of housing for diverse household sizes and types. EVIDENCE: Fraser,J.and R. Chaskin,J Bazuin.2013.Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households. Cityscape:A Journal of Policy Development and Research 15(2):83-100. Urban Land Institute.2003.Mixed Income Housing,Myth and Fact.Retrieved from:hitp.//inclusionaryhousing.ca/wp- content/uploads/sites/2/2010/01/ULI-Mixed-Income-Hsg-2003.pdf . • Access to Food, Jobs, and Services Page 27 Page 781 , Works Cited Active Living by Design. Clinical-Community Collaboration Case Examples. Retrieved from: http.//activelivingbydesign.org/resources/clinical-community-collaboration-case-examples/ American Association of State High way and Transportation Officials. 2011.A Policy on Geometric Design of High ways and Streets. Washington, DC:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. American Lung Association. (n.d). 'Healthy Air at Home."Retrieved from:http.//www.lung.org/our- initiatives/healthy-air/indoor/at-home/ American Public Transportation Association. 2009. 'Defining Areas of Influence."(Recommended Practice). Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/standards/Documents/APTA o20SUDS- UD-RP-001-09.pdf American Society of Landscape Architects. 2014. 'Health Benefits of Nature."Professional Practice. Retrieved from:http.//www.asla.org/healthbenefi'tsofnature.aspx Barton, H. and C. Tsourour. 2001. Healthy Urban Planning. New York:Routledge. Bauman,A. E., and F.C. Bull. Environmental Correlates of Physical Activity and Walking in Adults and Children:A Review of the Reviews. London:National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence. Retrieved from:http.//www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/word/environmental o20correlates o20of o 201ophysical%acti vity%20re vie w.pdf Boarnet, MG, and CL Anderson, K. Day, T. McMillan, M.Alfonzo. 2005. Evaluation of the California Safe Routes to School legislation:urban form changes and children's active transportation to school."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28(2): 134-40. Boodlal, L. 2003. Accessible Sidewalks and Street Crossings-an informational guide."US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved from: http://www.bikewaIk.org/pdfs/sopada_fhwa.pdf Brophy, V. andJO Lewis. 2011.A Green Vitruvius. London:Earthscan. California Department of Education. 2015. Sustainable Communities and School Planning. Retrieved from:http.//www.cde.ca.gov/ls/fa/bp/documents/bestprcticesustain.pdf California Planning Roundtable. 2008. 'Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance."Retrieved from: http.//www.cproundtable.org/media/uploads/pub files/CPR-Jobs-Housing.pdf Center forActive Design. 2010. 'Active Design Guidelines:Promoting Physical Activity and Health In Design."City of New York. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014. 'Health Effects of Cigarette Smoking."Smoking and Tobacco Use, Data and Statistics, Fact Sheets. Retrieved from:http.//www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ data-statistics/fact sheets/health-effects/effects cig smoking/ Centers for Disease Control. 2011. 'Census Tract Level State Maps of the Modified Retail Food Environment Index(mRFEI). Retrievedfrom:ftp.//ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Publications/dnpao%ensus- tract-level-state-maps-mrfei TAG508.pdf ChangeLab Solutions. (n.d.)'Pedestrian Friendly Code Directory:Eyes on the Street."Retrieved from: http.//www.changelabsolutions.org/childhood-obesity/eyes-street Works Cited I Page 28 Page 782 Congress for New Urbanism. 2001. Ped Sheds."Transportation Tech Sheet. Retrieved from: http.//cnu.civicactions.net/sites/www.cnu.org/files/CNU Ped Sheds.pdf Convergence Partnership. 2006. Healthy, Equitable Transportation Policy. Retrieved from: http.//www.convergencepartnership.org/sites/default/files/healthtrans fullbook final.PDF Eitler, Thomas W., E.T. McMahon, and T.C.Thoerig. 2013. Ten Principles for Building Healthy Places. Washington, D.C.: Urban Land Institute. Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d). "Improving Indoor Air Quality."Retrieved from: https.'//www.epa.go v/indoor-air-quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Near Roadway Air Pollution and Health. Retrieved from: http.//www3.epa.gov/otaq/nearroadway.htm Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. "Technical Guidance for Assessing Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis."Retrieved from:https.//www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016- 06/documents/ejtg 5.6 16 v5.l.pdf Forsyth,A. and L. Smead(Eds.). 2015. Mobility, Universal Design, Health, and Place(A Research Brief). Health and Places Initiative. Retrieved from:http.//research.gsd.harvardedu/hapi/files/2015/ 11/HAPI ResearchBrief UniversalDesign-I 12315.pdf Frank, LD and MA Andresen, TL Schmid. 2004. 'Obesity Relationships with Community Design, Physical Activity, and Time Spent in Cars.American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27(2):87-96. Frank L, Schmid T, Sallis J, Chapman J, Saelens B. 2005. "Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form:findings from SMARTRAQ."American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28117--125. Fraser, J. and R. Chaskin, J Bazuin. 2013. Making Mixed-Income Neighborhoods Work for Low-Income Households. Cityscape:A Journal of Policy Development and Research 15(2).•83-100. Freeman, Lance. 2002. "The Effects of Sprawl on Neighborhood Social Ties:An Explanatory Analysis". Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1).•69-77. Gotschi, T. 2011. 'Costs&Benefits of Bicycling Investments in Portland, Oregon."Journal of Physical Activity&Health 8(l).•549-558. Handy, S. L. 2004. Critical Assessment of the Literature on the Relationships among Transportation, Land Use, and Physical Activity. Washington, DC.- Transportation Research board and Institutes of Medicine Committee on PhysicalActivity, Health Transportation, and Land Use. Harnik, P. and B. Welle. 2011. From Fitness Zones to the Medical Mile:How Urban Park Systems Can Best Promote Health and Wellness. Trust for Public Land Retrieved from: https.•//www.tpl.org/sites/default/files/cloud.tpl,org/pubs/ccpe-health-promoting-parks-rpt.pdf Hobson, J, and Julie Quiroz-Martinez. 2002. Roadblocks to Health: Transportation Barriers to Healthy Communities. Transportation for Healthy Communities Collaborative. Retrieved from: http.//www.transformca.org/sites/default/files/roadblocks to health 2002.pdf Hodgson, K. 2011. Child care and Sustainable Community Development. (American Planning Association Family Friendly Communities Briefing Papers). Retrieved from: https.//www.planning.org/research/family/briefi'ngpapers/childcare.htm Works Cited I Page 29 Page 783 IESNA Security Lighting Committee. 2003. 'Guideline for Security Lighting for People, Property, and Public Spaces."New York:Illuminating Engineering Society ofAmerica. Jilcott, S. B., and S. Wade, J.T. McGuirt, Q. Wu, S. Lazorick, J.B. Moore. 2011. The association between the food environment and weight status among eastern North Carolina youth. Public Health Nutrition 14(09): 1610-1617. Kaczynski,A. and K. Henderson. 2007. 'Environmental correlates ofphysical activity a review of evidence about parks and recreation."Leisure Sciences 29(4):315-354. Klingerman M. and J. Sallis, S. Ryan, L. Frank, P. Nader. 2007. 'Association of neighborhood design and recreation environment variables with physical activity and body mass index in adolescents." American Journal of Health Promotion 21(4):274-77. Koepsel% T. 2002. "Crosswalk markings and the risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions in older pedestrians."The Journal of the American Medical Association 288(17):2136-2143. Koslowsky, M. and A. Kluger, M. Reich. 1995. Commuting stress:causes, effects, and methods of coping. New York:Plenum Press. Kryter, K. 1994.The Handbook of Hearing and the Effects of Noise: Physiology, Psychology, and Public Health. San Diego:Academic Press. Leadership for Health Communities. 2007.Action Strategies Toolkit. Washington, D.C.:Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Litman, T. 2010. 'Evaluating Public Transportation Health Benefits."American Public Transportation Association. Retrieved from:http.//www.apta.com/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/ A PTA-Health-Benefits Litman.pdf Local Investment in Child Care(LINCC). 2008. 'Building Child Care Into New Developments:A Guide For Creating Child Care Facilities In Transit-Oriented Developments."Retrieved from:http.•//www. reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/20080624Iinccde vBRweb.pdf Louv, Richard. 2008. Last Child in the Woods. New York:Algonquin Books. Lovell, S. 2010. 'Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States."Sustainability 2(8).•2499-2522. Lund, Hollie. 2002. "Pedestrian Environments and Sense of Community."Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21(3).•301-312. Moore L V and A V Diez Roux, JA Nettleton, DR Jacobs, M Franco. 2009. "Fast-food consumption, diet quality, and neighborhood exposure to fast food-the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis." American Journal of Epidemiology 170(1).•29-36. Mouzon, S. 2012. "Walk Appeal."Better Cities and Towns. Retrieved from:http.//bettercities.net/news- opinion/blogs/ste ve-mouzon/18645/walk-appeal National Association of City Transportation Officials. Urban Street Design Guide. Washington, DC- Island Press. National Center for Environmental Health. 2013. Parks and Trails Health Impact Assessment. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved from: https.•//www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/parks trails/sectionc.htm#1 Works Cited I Page 30 Page 784 National Center for Safe Routes to School. 2015. Creating Healthier Generations:A Look at the 10 Years of the Federal Safe Routes to School Program. Retrieved from: http.//saferoutesinfo.org/sites/default/files/SRTS 10YearReport Finalpdf Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.) 'Environmental Health."Healthy People 2020. Retrieved from:https.//www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics- objecti ves/topic%n viron m en tal-h ealth Painter, K. 1996. "The Influence of Street Lighting Improvements on Crime, Fear, and Pedestrian Street Use, after dark."Landscape and Urban Planning 35(2-3): 193-201. PolicyLink and the Marguerite Casey Foundation. 2016. High-Quality, Affordable Childcare forAlk Good for Families, Communities, and the Economy. (Issue Brief Series: The Economic Benefits of Equity). Retrieved from:http://www.policylinkorg/sites/default/files/Childcare-for-All-FINAL-05-06- 16.pdf Project for Public Spaces. 2009. Why Public Spaces Fail. Retrieved from:http.//www.pps.org/ reference/failedplacefeat/ Pucher J, and J. Dill, and S. Handy. 2010. "Infrastructure,programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review."Preventive Medicine 50: 106-25. Retting, R.A., and A. T. McCartt, S.A. Ferguson. 2003. 'A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes."American Journal of Public Health 93(9),• 1456-1462. Sacramento Transportation and Air Quality Collaborative. 'Best Practices for Complete Streets." Retrieved from:https.•//www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/cs/resources/cs- bestpractices-Sacramento.pdf Sallis, J.,and Karen Glanz. 2009. "PhysicalActivity and Food Environments:Solutions to the Obesity Epidemic."Milbank Quarterly. 87(1).• 123-154. Scott M., and D. Cohen, K. Evenson, J. Elder, D. Catellier, JS Ash wood,A. Overton. 2007 "Weekend Schoolyard Accessibility, Physical Activity, and Obesity The Trial ofActivity in Adolescent Girls (TAAG)Study."Preventive Medicine(44), 398-403. Shulaker, B. and J. Isacoff, T. Kjer, and K. Hart. 2016. Park Design for Physical Activity and Health. San Francisco: Trust for Public Land. Speck, J. 2012. Walkable City:How Downtown can Save America, One Step at a Time. New York: North Point Press. Srinivasan, S. and L. O Fallon,A. Dearry. 2003. 'Creating Healthy Communities, Healthy Homes, Healthy People:Initiating a Research Agenda on the Built Environment and Public Health." American Journal of Public Health 93(9): 1446-1450. Stangl, P. 2015. 'Block size-based measures of street connectivity A Critical Assessment and new approach."Urban Design International20(1),• 1-12. Trust for Public Land 2016. 'Parks on the Clock: Why we Believe in the 10-minute walk."Retrieved from:https.•//www.tpl.org/blog/why-the-l0-minute-walk#sm.0001bo0t0r4t1d50von1fn8ldyt18 Ulrich, R. Evidence Based Environmental Design for Improving Medical Outcomes. Retrieved from: http.//muhc-healing.mcgill.ca/english/Speakers/ulrich p.html Works Cited I Page 31 Page 785 Urban Land Institute. 2003. Mixed Income Housing, Myth and Fact. Retrieved from: http.//inclusionaryhousing.ca/wp-contentluploads/sitesl2l2O 10/0l/UL/-Mixed-Income-Hsg- 2003.pdf U.S. Green Building Council. 2016. LEED v4 for Neighborhood Development. Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/resources/leed-v4-neighborhood-development-current-version U.S. Green Building Council. (n.d.)LEED BD+C.•Schools.Access to Quality Transit. Retrieved from: http.//www.usgbc.org/credits/schools-new-construction/v4-draft/Itc5 Wakefield, J. 2004. Fighting Obesity Through the Built Environment."Environmental Health Perspectives 112(11):A616-A618. Wekerly, G. 2000. From Eyes on the Street to Safe Cities."Places 13(1).•44-49. Westrup, L. 2002. 'Quimby Act 101:An Abbreviated Overview."California Department of Parks and Recreation. Retrieved from:https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/795/files/quimbyl0l.pdf Zegeer, C. 2001. 'Safety effects of marked versus unmarked crosswalks at uncontrolled locations." Transportation Research Record(1773):56-68. Works Cited I Page 32 Page 786 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G1. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL �r Historic Preservation Commission and Planning Commission Agenda May 12, 2021 MINUTES Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 7:00 p.m. The regular meeting of the Historic Presentation Commission and Planning Commission was held on May 12, 2021. The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 7:OQ p.m. A. Roll Call Planning Commission present: Chairman Tony Guglielmo, Vice Chair Oaxaca, Commissioner Bryan Dopp, Commissioner Tony Morales and Commissioner Diane Williams. Staff Present: Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Anne McIntosh, Planning Director; Dat Tran, Assistant Planner; David Eoff, Senior Planner; Mike Smith, Principal Planner; Jason Welday, Engineering Director; Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner; Sean McPherson, Senior Planner; Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner; Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner. B. Public Communications Chairman Guglielmo opened for public communications and hearing no comment, closed communications. C. Consent Calendar- None D. Public Hearings D1. LOCATED NORTH OF THE 210 FREEWAY AND EAST OF EAST AVENUE AT THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF WILSHIRE DRIVE AND COPLEY DRIVE -M&A HOLDINGS, LLC - A request to construct 10 single-family homes on a previously approved Tract Map (SUBTT19917) within the Very Low (VL) Residential District of the Etiwanda Specific Plan, located north of the 210 Freeway and east of East Avenue at the easterly extension of Wilshire Drive and Copley Drive; APNs 0226-572-01 to -10. Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00558. Vincent Acuna, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Dopp asked about the sound wall and giving it any consideration 6 ft. wall level. Vincent Acuna answered yes and working with property owner. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. All Commissioners concur and are in support of the project. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 D2. LOCATED AT 10839 CARRIAGE DRIVE — MOLINAR DESIGN, INC - A request to construction a new 6,871 square foot two-story single-family residence with an attached 4-car garage on a 18,924 square foot lot within the Very Low(VL) Residential District within the Hillside Overlay District and Equestrian Overlay District - APN: 1074-531-09. Hillside Design Review File Number: DRC2019-00973. Mena Abdul-Ahad, Assistant Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Ryochum, resident, lives at 10826 Carriage Drive, asked if HOA is in conformance with debris control. Mena Abdul-Ahad answered yes, it was approved by HOA the dust control. Refer to Applicant. Erick Molinar, Applicant, responded yes, followed typical standard practice. Sherie Garcia, residents, lives at 10827 Carriage Drive, is concerned about their view. Mena Abdul-Ahad mentioned HOA reviewed elevation and meet minimal requirements. Consistent with homes already existing. Ryochum stated HOA not aware and not sure it went through HOA. Sherie Garcia stated it's the first-time hearing about this. Want confirmation it went through to HOA. Mena Abdul-Ahad stated she received letter from applicant on the HOA approval. Commissioners concur there is inconsistency with the plans and renderings. Stating it's an important step. Requesting to defer action and come back with requested records. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo motioned public hearing will remain open. Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 to continue Item D2 to May 26'" PC meeting. D3. LOCATED IN THE ETIWANDA SPECIFIC PLAN AT THE EAST TERMINUS OF ARAPAHO ROAD BETWEEN EAST AVENUE AND CHOCTAW PLACE — W&W LAND DESIGN CONSULTANTS —Site plan review of a proposal to subdivide a vacant parcel of approximately 146,429 square feet (3.36 acres) into five residential (5) lots in the Very Low (VL) Residential District that includes a Variance to reduce the required lot depth on two (2) lots and a minor exception for wall height for a project site -APN: 0225-181-73. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts has been prepared for consideration. - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, VARIANCE, AND MINOR EXCEPTION File Numbers: SUBTT20152, DRC2019-00786, DRC2019-00787. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES—May 12, 2021 Page 2 of 8 FINAL Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. Jim Freeman and Bruce Hemlock, Choctaw residents, expressed concerns about wall height. Tabe van der Zwaag stated the wall height is 6 ft. With no more comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Vice Chair Oaxaca, second by Commissioner Dopp. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 261" PC meeting. D4. LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EAST AVENUE AND SOUTH OF BANYAN STREET — MANNING HOMES - A request to subdivide 10.24 acres of land into 17 lots including the Design Review of 17 single-family residences, a Minor Exception for increased wall heights and a Tree Removal Permit to remove onsite trees for a project site in the Very Low (VL) Residential District (.1 - 2 Dwelling Units per Acre) of the Etiwanda Specific Plan and the Equestrian Overlay District; APNs: 0225-191-09 and -17. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts was prepared for consideration. Environmental Assessment and Tentative Tract Map, Design Review, Minor Exception and Tree Removal Permit File Numbers: SUBTT20334, DRC2020- 00139, DRC2020-00141, DRC2020-00140. Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this Public Hearing item. Commissioner Williams requesting creative artwork near bike racks. Jim Manning, Applicant, stated they will work on creating Art design at bike racks even though exempt from Art fee. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo opened public hearing. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo closed public hearing. Motion by Commission Dopp, second by Vice Chair Oaxaca. Motion carried 5-0 Planning Commission directed staff to bring the resolution of approval to May 261" PC meeting. E. General Business El. LOCATED AT 8768 ARCHIBALD AVENUE - ORBIS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS -A request to develop a new commercial building with a service station and convenience store within the General Industrial (GI) District; APN: 0209-032-35. File Numbers: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 3 of 8 FINAL Sean McPherson, Senior Planner, presented Commissioners with a Staff Report and presentation (copy on file). During his presentation, he announced exciting news that the applicant agreed to design the building to Lead Silver Standards. He explained "Lead Silver Standards" shows a dedication and a commitment to environmentally and sustainable development. He said this would be the first Lead Silver Certified 7/11 in the State of California, which has been included in the Conditions of Approval. Note: Change to the following Condition of Approvals: #3, #8, #20, 21 (refer to the revised COA for detailed information). Chairman Guglielmo asked the Commission if there were any comments for staff on this project. Commissioner Dopp asked regarding concentration service stations, is it a good planning principal to put so many gas stations in a specific part of town. Anne McIntosh commented that the moratorium had an exception for projects that receive a building permit within 6 months of the date that it was adopted. She said there was a recognition that some projects might go forward if they are able to meet the deadline. Commissioner Dopp asked about types of services and buildings are in an area. Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney, mentioned there are cases that have said there is a legitimate planning purpose and exercise of the City's police power to limit the number of similar types of uses next to each other if the City is concerned that the number of uses will start to compete against each other in such a way the competition will cause closures and that eventually causes blight in the community. It's that blight position caused by too much competition that could potentially be a legitimate planning concern to weigh in on as a Planning Commission. Commissioner Dopp mentioned in the scope of our expectation and drive to create equity in southwest Cucamonga, his concern and considerations about a key parcel of land on a key street looking forward in terms of the General Plan is whether we believe this is the best use for this land from a land use perspective. Sean McPherson responded that staff's recommendation is based on the application in front of them today. He said in terms of broader conversation regarding gas stations and types of uses should be allowed on major corridors, most visible parcels, that broader question is why staff is working towards further analyzing service stations. For example, why there is currently a moratorium to address those broader holistic questions. The applicant has heard the concerns and responded to the Commissions questions and concerns to the point where staff feels we recommend approval of this project. Anne McIntosh stated when we had our overview of the General Plan Update, we talked specifically this being in the middle of a focus area for Cucamonga town center. She said you probably are recalling some of the comments we made about the importance of this neighborhood and desire to have smaller businesses that serve the neighborhood. Creating that walkability connections and opportunities creating employment. She said it's valid to take that into consideration. As this being a key corner for the future of Cucamonga Town Center. It's a valid discussion to have. Matt Burris mentioned whether or not there should be any concerns about over concentration of service station is a legitimate one. Commissioner Dopp asked about conditions and food. He said his understanding is there really is no hard requirement that 7/11 maintain the fresh food options. He asked is this something that Planning entertained or we can, in the back end, in a condition by adding a Healthy RC requirement. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 4 of 8 FINAL Nicholas Ghirelli stated he thought the applicant already agreed to do that. Yes, we can condition that. Commissioner Morales asked if there will be bright lights over the gas pumps. Sean McPherson answered no. In conversation with the applicant, the tri-color band surrounding the gas station canopy will not be illuminated. Commissioner Williams stated she is fine with it. With no further discussion from Commissioners, Chairman Guglielmo announced even though this is not a public hearing, he opened for public comments. Grant Ross, Orbis Real Estate Partners, Applicant, is available to answer questions. Commissioner Dopp asked what unique options 7/11 will be offering in the type of food they are putting in their store. As well as on a percentage basis. Michelle Moore, 7/11 representative, explained their fresh food will consist of fresh fruit, pre-made sandwiches, protein packs, hummus, as well as ready to go items such as fresh eggs, milk, all standard dairy products. She said it will be a larger grocery set with plenty of product selection. Do not know percentage. With no comments from the Public, Chairman Guglielmo looked to the Commissioners for deliberation, comments. Commissioner Williams stated the company has shown dedication to make it successful with their decision to eliminate beer and wine. She is in support. Commissioner Morales stated this project proposed at this site does not rise to our expectation and goals for our city in that part of the southwest section. He heard resident's concerns being so close to the schools and homes across the street. Appreciate that they made the change outside with the canopy for the gas pumps, but the bright lights underneath will have an impact on the neighborhood. He said there will be a lot of traffic around the school. He said this would probably work best in another part of our city but for this site will not make the findings for approval and should deny the entitlements. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed the applicant has gone the extra mile in terms of responding to the concerns by staff, Commission, and residents in the area. He said this project is an opportunity to introduce what could be a new model for this type of project. One that is a lot more responsive, new and modern. He said it could bring a new version of this convenience store model to a community that could be a positive addition and should not suffer in comparison with other older approaches to the gas station/convenience store combination. He said looking at this project, this is one we struct a good balance between the needs of the community and expectations for this part of the city. One that could be new and modern in a good way. Commissioner Dopp asked a question regarding Healthy RC initiative and how does the process work. Sean McPherson replied the Healthy RC initiative was incorporated into the current General Plan where staff had analyzed this project up against. In terms of our consideration as to whether or not this would be seen as a benefit to the community. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 5 of 8 FINAL John Gillison, City Manager, explained Healthy RC process involves doing an audit of the products being sold. Healthy RC usually works with registered or certified dieticians and it's about moving away from the pre-packaged and some fast food and moving towards healthier choices. He said it's an interactive process and at the end of that, it's trying to make sure they have healthy choices and qualifies as a healthy option. Commissioner Dopp mentioned he does not know how it would look like in terms of a condition. John Gillison explained you could require that they work with Healthy RC and meet the standards applied to other restaurants and/or small grocery stores to ensure that they have sufficient fresh and healthy options available to customers. He said that would be the closer we could come at this point and time. Typically, the process is done with an existing store and they were looking to change out what they were selling. Matt Burris asked if Dopp can elaborate on what his concern and question is in regard to the condition. Commissioner Dopp responded his concern is the whole project. He said what if this model does not work from a Healthy perspective. He is looking for a condition that holds them to it. Nicholas Ghirelli asked Dopp if he is looking for a condition that is going to address the type of products sold at the 7/11 or looking for a greater justification to deny the project as a whole because you don't think it's use is appropriate at this location. Commissioner Dopp stated maybe he is foreseeing this project getting through. He said there needs to be an expectation moving forward to make sure 7/11 adheres to the principals and values the other Commissioners have expressed. In terms of a commitment to go above and beyond what a traditional convenience store actually does. Matt Burris provided options to the Planning Commissioners that could identify a minimum percentage type of foods or menu with the restaurant and the convenience store have dedicated towards Healthy foods. If you're concern and want to go broader and speak to the design of the site or need additional analysis to better understand what parameters that the project maybe excelling in or not doing so well in with regards to its physical form in the neighborhood and it's context. Commission Dopp stated he does not know if it advances the city towards long term generic goals of creating a world class community. He is not sure this really provides high quality job opportunities for the area. He said there is an expectation and model in the city that one of the bases to construct a mini argument here is to deny the project is it has been reiterated by Staff, Mayor and Council the desire to hold off for higher quality development is a worthwhile goal. Commissioner Dopp said we can do better and over time by committing one of the key vacant lots of land, maybe holding off and seeing overtime assuming the General Plan comes to fruition, we see a tremendous increase in development, activity and quality that 7/11 might look out of place. That is his general argument as to why we should deny the project. Requesting Commissioners take into consideration Healthy RC and maybe finding some way to put into resolution some formal requirements moving forward. Thinking long term. Vice Chair Oaxaca expressed we have encountered a project that has exposed issues through discussions about this project, he doesn't feel fully equipped to grapple with. The applicant has followed the rules the best they can. He said we are also dealing with conversations taking place at the Council level. We have a project before us that could potentially meet that we could to better, we have been HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 6 of 8 FINAL talking about. He is starting to feel less certain to make a decision aye or nay tonight based on what he has heard. Chairman Guglielmo expressed his excitement for this project, the new 7/11 prototype to be used in Rancho Cucamonga. Stating applicant has gone the extra mile listening to our concerns. Offered up a Lead Silver Certification. He worries about the Healthy RC, since there is really no clear outline what that guideline might be. He is open to a discussion, but it may not be spelled out clear enough to where they commit to something but cannot deliver on it. As far as the best use for that land, he thought it might be a multi-tenant industrial park with retail stores in the front but it's just not that big of a site. It could generate in terms of revenue for the City. Talking about revenue per acre. He said it's the best use for that site in the foreseeable future. He is in support and would like to see it move forward. Commissioner Oaxaca stated he is certainly not the one to make a decision. Something we should all discuss as a Commission. Nicholas Ghirelli provided options for the Commissioners explaining they have draft resolutions to approve the project with all the conditions. They can ask staff to consider drafting conditions to address concerns assuring that fresh food is sold in dedicated areas as identified in the floor plan. He said if you try and come up with standards what those foods are, Commission should consider continuing the item since staff will not have those standards in a form of a condition tonight. Options are: approve as is; approve with new conditions; continue it so staff can explore new conditions; or deny the project. Commissioner Williams mentioned she has a 7/11 around the corner from where she lives. It's an old traditional 7/11 and she has been known to run over there and is amazed to find the item on their shelf. She does not find it unhealthy at all. The fact is the applicant has gone the extra mile is very impressive. She suggested that Healthy RC has guidelines and would be a very simple thing to take their logo to restaurants and have it placed on their menu, "This is recommended by Healthy RC". She feels like she is being asked to judge somebody who has already done everything we asked of them. She didn't think they would come back but they did. She believes the neighbors will enjoy it very much and love having the gas station there. She said we could end up having a nice product in that corner. Matt Burris mentioned that the Healthly Development Checklist has a number of parameters on healthy retailers and food offerings. We do have some information we could reference to help give suggestions, inspiration to address or draft a Condition of Approval to speak to healthy food retailing. If so inclined to have staff look into. Commissioner Morales stated he appreciate all the work staff and applicant and hearing the comments on both sides. He said it's not in the best interest for the city but respects what Commission decides to do tonight. Motion by Chairman Guglielmo, second by Commissioner Williams. Motion carried 3-2. Against: Morales, Dopp. F. Director Announcements - None G. Commission Announcements - None H. Adjournment HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES— May 12, 2021 Page 7 of 8 FINAL Motion by Commissioner Williams, second by Commissioner Dopp to adjourn the meeting, motion carried 5- 0. Meeting was adjourned at 9:48 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Eli ab th Thornhill Ex tive Assistant, Planning Department Approved: May 26, 2021 - HPC/PC Meeting. HPC/PC Regular Meeting MINUTES — May 12, 2021 Page 8 of 8 FINAL 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING -ITEM G1. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL- RECEIVED JULY 7, 2021 AT 5:03PM From: Melissa Myers<melimyers2013@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday,July 7, 2021 5:03 PM To: Records <Records@cityofrc.us> Subject: Notice of Public Hearing RE: Planning Commission Decision SUBTPM20164 CAUTION:This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you Irecognize the sender and know the content is safe.) Hello Sean, Unfortunately, I am unable to make the meeting tonight due to prior commitments. I would like the following statement to be read to the City Council and Planning Commission Board. Please confirm receipt of this email. Thank you. Melissa Myers Ferrell "Good Evening City Council Members and Planning Commission Board Members: Thank you for your service in making our beautiful city of Rancho Cucamonga a great place to reside. My name is Melissa Myers Ferrell. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the meeting this evening due to prior commitments. I am writing this e-mail to express my concern for the project: SUBTPM20164; DRC2020-00138; and DRC2020-00087 - Orbis Real Estate Partner (building of 7-Eleven Convenience Store and Gas Station). I am a resident of the Discovery Village Complex directly across the street from the proposed project. I am concerned if this project is moved forward it will create additional crime, loitering , vandalism (including additional trash near the Discovery Village's Archibald Gate), traffic jams, and lower the value of my home property. I concerned for the following reasons: 1) The 7-Eleven Convenience Store is proposed to stay open 24 hours. This will provide unlimited alcoholic beverages at all times (including late evenings and early mornings). Multiple studies have shown that increased alcoholic beverage consumption within a community increases crime, increases homelessness, and eventually lowers the property value. RC City will be spending more money on law enforcement and resources to address these problems. 2) At the Discovery Village Archibald Gate we have problems with loitering, vandalism, and trash that is dumped during evening hours. Having a convenience store across the street provides easy access to alcoholic beverages (which will increase the loitering and vandalism in our community). This has created a major challenge for our complex because we are constantly spending thousands of dollars to deal with trash removal, cleaning up, and addressing vandalism. 3) Traffic Jam - My last concern about having a convenience store at that location is the increased traffic. Traffic jams regularly occur when the two local schools (Rancho Cucamonga Middle School and Cucamonga Elementary School) are in session. In the morning, it's virtually impossible to leave our complex because of the traffic from these institutions. Adding a convenience store will only increase the traffic congestion in our community. I asked respectfully that the City Council and Planning Commission Board Members decline this proposal. Thank you for your time and consideration. Melissa Myers Ferrell Homeowner of at Discovery Village 8728 1/2 Pinecrest Place Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730" 2021-07-07 -MATERIAL SUBMITTED DURING PUBLIC CO MUNICATIONS FOR ITEM G1 V, I c — q\.,& '�- 6'f'(T I te" /d '� 6 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of gih Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. • Generate more traffic to an already congested area. • Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) • Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ■ Based on Real Estate News "10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ■ #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition,within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address Signatur L/I-S Par(4� Cve Stgk(w , 0 ab& �\n e_U.6 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of 9th Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. and residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. • Generate more traffic to an already congested area. • Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) ® Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ® Based on Real Estate News"10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ® #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition, within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address signature '6_7$�� -Proe CV05P Pi z- "wi aqcjc�i C) e C// C, Y:� 3 q-T7j _ n 0 -7.36 7�q L �67 6 Neighborhood Petition Project: Proposed 7-11 with Laredo Tacos and gas station on the southwest corner of 91h Street and Archibald Avenue in Rancho Cucamonga. The residents from the nearby neighborhood OPPOSE this project, as we believe it could: • Attract crime as the convenience store is open 24 hours. 0 Generate more traffic to an already congested area. 0 Create unhealthy air standards(from the numerous gas station pumps being proposed.) Go against our"Healthy RC" standards by not offering healthy food options. ■ Based on Real Estate News "10 Industries That Diminish Property Value The Most" ■ #2 of 10 industries is"Convenience Store With Gas Station" In addition, within blocks of this proposed project already exists several convenience stores and gas stations. Our neighborhood is oversaturated with these types of developments. We do not need another one. What we do need and want is equity. Proposed developments should be high-quality that bring high-end jobs and better access to goods and services to this side of the City, such as a grocery store. Name Address isi, ature P A •�;fir: j,,,,.�;i c e r .... _ • J Cf�1 flt� 8768 Archibald Avenue 7- Eleven Project July 7, 2021 0 mmmmmml CITY OF RANCHO CUCAM O NGA Application Request • Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) — to allow lot split; • Minor Design Review (MDR) — construction of new building and various site improvements; • Conditional Use Permit (CUP) — to allow the service station, and convenience store. *Commission denied request for off-sale alcohol and applicant withdrew related request for Public Convenience or Necessity. I a im AN ' G'oogle Earth; CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Elevations (No Change) �iaaa— - rivau F 1 4 3 Y 5 5 2 C E C E E E A C E E E E M EXTERIOR ELEVATION-EAST(FACING ARCHIBALD AVE.)y;fi"_`-0. 2 E 3 2 8 T A F G 0. „Y4LICCNILPx /' j oo E eleven ��r�aP"s"uwon I5L6ti@if6 � k FINI§XfLWP- -iwisw nO�OA E E H E E C E E C E C F F F B A EXTERIOR ELEVATION-WEST(STOREFRONT) a"`E-0. 1 SMALL FLOWERING TREES SUCH AS CERCIS OCCIOENTAUS OR CERCIS CANADENSIS ELEVATION VERTICAL ACCENT TREES SUCH AS ALOE'HERCULES' 'm r - - -��:L� I� !I / BUILDING EXTERIOR PATIO i / e 1 I{- — TREETTREE \ m 1I\[ ERTICALACCENT TREES SUCH S ALOE'HERCULES' C V G f f WERINGTREES SUC H ERCIS CANADENSIS S CERCIS OCC LIS OR 3EC() 1 ROPBSEDMPO SEUE - I ATryGRANITE GRANIT lz i ARCHIBALD AVE'� �STREETTREE LAYERED ORNAMENTAL ENHANCEDRAVINGATARCMBALD NO-MOWMEADOWGRASS GRASSES,FLOWERING WALKWAYCONSISTING OFINTEGRAL TYPESUCHASCAREK SHRURSANDSUCCULENTS COLORED CONCRETE WITH TOPCAST HANSA FINISH I ^ CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN V, ,D m ao + 7-ELEVEN CORNER OF 9TH STREET 81 ARCHIBALD AVENUE SCAB""-'°`°" RANCHO CUCAMONGA,CA ��� L-2 r I , ■ NOW � { J CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r r` :X um ..... hL Ell, i 1 �+I 1�ti�II>b�.'�r•--.4 I �` j� 1 — � �. }{� {(�'"yam R a �^ �'�Lryy 11��.rTl-411f•'i i.r,;wi 1 j�l � 1 �'�41�i•Id yP(1.��9�h'.Y�.(�1 � iYt �3 .J r �+ � q'�. A� •r •`a';"' .I� 3y t �1�„uh„�A�iKs - -�". CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r AL y. � ,. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r Timeline • January 19, 2021 — Design Review Committee • February 24, 2021 — Planning Commission denies off-sale alcohol (Reso. Adopted March 10); • May 12, 2021 — Planning Commission approves balance of project; • May 19, 2021 — Council appeals decision; • July 7, 2021 — City Council public hearing Outreach • November 2020 — Applicant held virtual neighborhood meeting; • January 2021 — City staff hosted second neighborhood meeting; • February 24, 2021* — Notices mailed, published and site posted; • June 22, 2021 — Staff hosts presentation of project to Healthy RC Steering Committee; • July 7, 2021* — notices mailed, published and site posted on June 23, 2021. *Notices for February 24 and July 7 mailed to expanded radius to include neighborhoods adjacent to local schools CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA WI Ongoing Areas of Concern • Service station and Convenience Store concentration in Southwest • Hours of operation • Nighttime lighting • Potential for crime • Healthy food options limited and do not meet expectations of HealthyRC guidelines • On-sale alcohol service at restaurant • Not enough amenities for neighbors • Orientation of building to back instead of Archibald CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA x _e Y' I1811i1R85 [�g�Rrr� kw Psi Poo Y�4� ML (amples of healthier options CITY OF RANCHLOW to LW-,XV&oj m S WE �� -ared • Taco NN �^`YR7FnLs �rrmS' 'mr�e��-r .�'vdNUHs-•.�'v�r � �'� 215 - E SALSA - •5 s5 ORDER,* HERE - ?r. 214 VIP Ir I ir --out ;I, I ly - � -■ � �: :~ k cs •.��. � �'yr,e b _ Z, gM 1. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r In summary . . . Fast Food + On-sale alcohol + Service Station + Convenience Store = Not the right combination for this location CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA Recommendation If the applicant would like additional time to review and respond to new evidence, provide that opportunity Direct staff to return on August 4, 2021 with resolutions to: 1 ) Deny the CUP for a convenience store 2) Deny the CUP for a service station 3) Deny the MDR for the structure 4) Approve the tentative parcel map Questions/Comments ? �1 41 y ,, .a-``�-' ` ,? .�<.,;`i� ! ,..i, ���ald.+�'hip"tw'� i f�l•�: .,MF�i��. YMt'.`�y-"k'R� YiPN.' � .e ,r 4[. -4.:a�.,L-.l��rS��yi,.. r� rr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA r �� A h 6AAA I CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA $l DATE: July 7, 2021 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager INITIATED BY: Matt Burris, AICP, Deputy City Manager Anne McIntosh, AICP, Planning Director Jennifer Nakamura, Management Analyst II SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing for Consideration of Introduction and First Reading of Ordinance No. 982, to be Read by Title Only and Waive Further Reading, Amending Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Modify Administrative Procedures within the Development Code and Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses and Definitions and Create New Development Standards for Industrial Development within the City. This Item is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA)and the City's CEQA Guidelines under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) (DRC2021-00170). (Continued from June 16, 2021 City Council Meeting) (ORDINANCE NO. 982) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission and Staff recommend that the Council reopen the public hearing for testimony and introduce Ordinance No. 982 entitled "An Ordinance Of The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, Amending Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code To Modify Administrative Procedures within the Development Code And Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses And Definitions And Create New Development Standards For Industrial Development Within The City, Making Findings In Support Thereof, AndMaking A Determination That The Ordinance Is Exempt From The California Environmental Quality Act", waive full reading and read by title only. BACKGROUND: On June 16, 2021, City Council initiated a public hearing on Ordinance 982. In the 36 hours prior to the public hearing, written comments were received regarding the ordinance with concerns not previously expressed or considered. Council opened the public hearing, received testimony and unanimously voted to continue the item to the July 7, 2021 meeting to allow staff to address written comments and testimony received prior to and at the hearing. For more information on background of the proposed amendment and a summary of the proposed changes, please refer to the City Council staff report dated June 16, 2021. ANALYSIS: This section aggregates and addresses comments received between the release of the staff report and the public hearing held on June 16th. Page 787 Issue 1 — Effects on Existing Industrial Uses Questions have arisen from existing industrial owners and users about the impact these changes have on their current operations. Some asked if a use is now conditionally permitted will they need to apply for a minor or conditional use permit. Under the current nonconforming use ordinance, found at Chapter 17.62 of the Municipal Code, "[a] use lawfully occupying a structure or a site that does not conform with the use regulations or the site area regulations for the district in which the use is located shall be deemed to be a nonconforming use and may be continued", unless the use is enlarged, extended, or discontinued. This provision would allow existing uses to continue to operate as legal nonconforming uses, even if they would otherwise be required to obtain a minor or conditional use permit under the proposed ordinance. Commenters have stated that these nonconforming use protections do not go far enough because they would not permit a new tenant of the same type of use to occupy a space where a nonconforming use had previously operated. Staff disagrees with this position, but to allay these concerns staff has inserted a new provision into the ordinance to clarify that existing uses can continue to operate as lawful, permitted uses. If the tenant changes, but the use is the same, it will also be considered a lawful use and will not require additional permits or further environmental review. If that use substantially changes or is discontinued for 180 days, then the use ceases to be lawful and must comply with the provisions of the code, including obtaining any required permits. If the tenant changes, but the use is the same, it will also be considered a lawful use and will not require additional permits. This language has been updated since the June 16t" meeting and is included as section 20 of the ordinance. Issue 2 — Conditionally Permitted Uses for Projects under Construction There was concern expressed amongst developers of industrial projects currently under construction in the City that making certain industrial uses conditionally permitted created uncertainty in lease negotiations and may make new buildings more challenging to lease to new tenants, adding last minute time and cost delays that were unexpected. Some felt that our decision to allow smaller industrial uses (50,000 sq. ft or less) to be permitted by right was appropriate, however there are several industrial buildings that are nearing completion in the mid- range in size (50,000— 125,000 sq. ft.)that may require a conditional use permit for new tenants, which may delay or prevent leasing of these buildings in the near term. To address these concerns, staff has added language in the ordinance (Section 20) that allows industrial buildings currently under construction up to 180 days from the effective date of the ordinance, to use the existing land use table to determine if the use is permitted. Based on the current trajectory of the ordinance, if approved, tenants for industrial buildings under construction would be subject to the existing land use table if they establish occupancy and secure business licenses by mid-February 2022. After that point in time, the new land use tables will become effective even for industrial buildings currently under construction. Issue 3 — Prohibition on Truck Yards and other Parking Facilities Comments were received at the public hearing expressing concern with the proposed prohibition on stand-alone truck yards and similar parking facilities. These comments were provided by an individual looking to develop a future truck yard within the City. There are several reasons why staff is recommending this type of use be prohibited. The industrial stakeholders provided valuable feedback on parking for industrial uses. One of the Page 2 Page 788 things we learned from our industrial partners was that parking is important and more efficient when it is available on site. Some industrial projects currently under review are proposing more parking than is required by code to accommodate future on-site parking needs. As there is less land available in the city, one of the goals of this code update was to review our land use table and examine which land uses are the highest and best use for our remaining parcels. Off-site parking lots and truck yards increase VMT, generate more GHG emissions and increase wear and tear on our transportation infrastructure with little to no community benefit. Essentially these uses only generate property tax, which is extremely low because Rancho Cucamonga is a post- Prop 13 City. The result is an inefficient and low value use for otherwise high value land in a City that is rapidly building out. Truck yards and parking facilities were also not the only uses eliminated from the code. Other high impact/low benefit uses were also prohibited such as heavy manufacturing and wholesale, fuel storage and distribution, auto vehicle dismantling, and scrap recycling facilities. If an existing manufacturing business needs additional parking and is space constrained on site, off-site parking may be allowed with a minor use permit. This allows businesses already located in Rancho Cucamonga to grow without being forced to relocate. Issue 4 — Environmental Analysis Some commentors took issue with the City's determination that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. This ordinance modifies the procedures applicable to certain types of uses, prohibits or requires enhanced discretionary review of high-impact uses, and adopts new development standards for industrial uses to mitigate impacts and improve efficiency. Staff believes that this proposed ordinance has no possibility of causing environmental impacts and has therefore determined it is exempt from CEQA. In order to further confirm this conclusion, staff retained an environmental consultant to evaluate whether any of the provisions of the ordinance could cause an environmental impact. The attached memorandum from the environmental consulting firm PlaceWorks concludes that the ordinance will have the effect of reducing potential environmental impacts associated with industrial development compared to the existing baseline conditions under the existing Development Code. Issue 5 — Relationship to the General Plan Several commenters argued that the City is prepared the proposed ordinance solely to implement the forthcoming General Plan update, which is still in draft form. They argue that this necessarily renders the proposed ordinance inconsistent with the current General Plan. Although the proposed ordinance is likely consistent with the draft General Plan update, this does not mean that the ordinance is necessarily inconsistent with the existing General Plan. Indeed, the June 16th staff report and draft findings identify current General Plan policies that are consistent with the proposed ordinance. The proposed industrial development standards and the General Plan update are two separate planning efforts by the City. Staff began studying the proposed industrial standards as a result of the surge in interest in industrial development, which led to the City Council's adoption of the moratorium on such uses within certain areas of the City. The City Council directed staff to prepare this ordinance during the moratorium period. On the other hand, the General Plan update had begun many months before the moratorium was adopted and is focused on high-level planning within the City. Page 3 Page 789 Issue 6 — Onsite Renewable Energy Generation In addition to the clarifications and changes described above, staff continued conversations with stakeholders regarding the proposed requirements related to onsite renewable energy generation as part of project development. In response to those discussions, the proposed code has been amended to include an energy generation phasing plan for industrial developments that, subject to the City Engineer's approval, would allow developers to construct and operate onsite renewable energy generation at a level that meets or exceeds the anticipated electrical at the time of development but sets thresholds and triggers to expand that infrastructure as new load from either intensified electrical demand due to a change in use, assumptions in the plan, or new electrical needs such as electrification of vehicle and trucking fleets. Further, the revised code language allows for construction and operation of onsite renewable energy generation to be reduced or delayed should the electric utility servicing the building certify that it cannot accept the power that would be generated from the site. Staff believes that these changes address the ultimate needs for new facilities to generate the power they need to operate and to meet future electrical vehicle charging demands and provides the industrial developers flexibility in scaling to meet increasing demands as those demands come online. In order to ensure that this need is met, the proposed language also includes biennial reviews to determine if and when additional infrastructure is needed. Noticing Prior to scheduling for public hearings, it was determined that there were over 1,000 property owners to whom mailed notices would need to be sent. In accordance with State law and past practice, 1/8th page legal ads were published in a local newspaper of general circulation in lieu of mailed notices. The first notice was published by the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on May 12, 2021, 14 days in advance of the May 26th Planning Commission meeting. Prior to the June 16th City Council hearing on this amendment, a second notice was published in the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin on June 4, 2021, 12 days in advance of the hearing. FISCAL IMPACT: Developing a robust industrial sector with well planned developments with a sufficient diversity ofuses and appropriate controls will prevent fiscal strains on our tax base and infrastructure costs over the long term. COUNCIL MISSION /VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED: This code update directly addresses the Council's vision to build on our success as a world class community by implanting new development standards that will enhance the overall quality and performance of our industrial sector. Through the engagement of stakeholders and learning more about industrial development, and using the information provided by our stakeholders to guide our decisions on the code updates, we are guided by the Council's core values of intentionally embracing and anticipating the future, working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff and all stakeholders, and intentionally embracing and anticipating the future. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1 — Memorandum from PlaceWorks Attachment 2 — Ordinance 982 Page 4 Page 790 8J PLACEWORKS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE June 28, 2021 To Jennifer Nakamura ADDRESS Jennifer.Nakamura@cityofrc.us FROM Mark Teague,AICP SUBJECT Environmental Analysis for Proposed Industrial Zone Text Changes Project Overview The proposed project will update portions of the City's existing Development Code by revising some non- residential land uses and development standards to be more reflective of modern-day employment and manufacturing.The proposed changes to the land uses are considered refinements to the existing table of allowable and conditional uses,and defining land use descriptions that are currently permitted under a broader category of industrial uses. (See Table 1)The proposed development standards are intended to mitigate impacts associated with modern industrial development. Most of the changes affect the process of considering a new land use application, moving much of the consideration from a Permitted to a Conditional Use Permit to Minor Use Permit.The changes also involve adding Planning Commission-level consideration of Conditional Use Permits for some land uses which elevates approval from the Director to the Commission.The Design Review process(RMC§ 17.20.040) remains in place for all non-residential buildings considered by this proposed project.The Design Review process allows for the establishment of reasonable conditions and is therefore considered discretionary and subject to the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). Table 1 shows the proposed new land uses, land uses that would change from an existing condition of non- permitted,conditional, or minor use permit to a permitted use of some level as part of the Development Code revisions.The full text of the proposed zone changes, included as Attachment A to this memorandum, shows land uses that are changing from Conditional to Minor Use Permit consideration. In addition to the proposed land use changes,the proposed Development Code amendment includes special provisions for consideration of buildings over 450,000 square feet in size and establishes requirements for a rezone to the Large Building Zoning Overlay(RMC§17.26.020) master plan for some uses(RMC§17.22.020).Another change would allow a parking plan to revise the amount of parking applied to a use,or to allow off-site parking to support a use. The other changes to the development standards applicable to industrial development are described below. Summary The proposed changes to the Development Code are regulatory in nature and could not result in physical changes to the environment;therefore,an exemption to CEQA under Section 15061(B)(3) "Common Sense"exemption is appropriate. 3 MacArthur Place,Suite 1100 1 Santa Ana,California92707 •.. • 1 ACEWORKS Table 1, Summary List of Changes Not Including Change from Conditional to Minor Permit IP NI IE Land Use Exist New Exist New Exist New Emergency Shelter C N Schools,Specialized Education and Training/Studio N C Park and Ride Facility P C C N Parking Facility C N C N C N Wind Energy System—Small N P N P N P Business Support Services N P Call Center N C Child Day Care Facility/Center C P N P Garden Center/Plant Nursery N P Home Improvement Supply Store N P Internet Cafe N P N P Mobile Hot Food Truck N P N P Office,Accessory N P Personal Services N P Restaurant, No Liquor Service N C Retail,Accessory N P Retail,General N C Auto and Vehicle Storage C N C N Commercial (Secondary/Accessory)-Industrial N P Distribution/Fulfillment Center,Small P P P Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large N C C Parcel Sorting Facilities N N N Parcel Hub Small (< 130,000 sq.ft.) N N N Parcel Hub Large(>130,000 sq.ft.) N N N Fuel St^F^^^& D'StFib tiers Eliminated from all zone districts Lumber Yard N N C Maker Space/Accessory Maker Space M P P Manufacturing,Green Technology P P Eliminated from all zone districts MaRUf-,GWFO.,, LJ.,ayy N4iRi..+ufl.4.,.,pac4 Eliminated from all zone districts Manufacturing, Light-Small P P Manufacturing, Light-Large C C MaRwfaGWFeR ^"^� Eliminated from all zone districts Microbrewery I I N P Recycling Facility,Collection P I C I P C ReGYGIORg Paeility,SGFap and DismantiiAg Pa&4t„ Eliminated from all zone districts Research and Development I I I I N P ;� Eliminated from all zone districts Eliminated from all zone districts Wholesale,Storage,and Distribution- Medium I C I P C IP: Industrial Park; NI: Neo-Industrial; IE: Industrial Employment June 28,2021 Page 2 Page 792 PLACEWORKS CEQA Process The proposed zone changes are a project as defined by Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines.As required by Section 15061 of the Guidelines, the City evaluated the proposal to determine if the project is exempt from CEQA.There are three criteria for this review: (1)The project is exempt by statute (see, e.g. Article 18, commencing with Section 15260). Discussion: There are no applicable statutory exemptions that would apply to the proposed project. (2)The project is exempt pursuant to a categorical exemption (see Article 19, commencing with Section 15300) and the application of that categorical exemption is not barred by one of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2. Discussion: While there are no directly applicable categorical exemptions that would apply to the proposed project, Class 8,Actions by Regulatory Agencies for the Protection of the Environment(§15308) was reviewed as the proposed project would increase the application requirements and ultimately change the development standards for new land uses. No relaxation of the development requirements is proposed. (3)The activity is covered by the commonsense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment,the activity is not subject to CEQA. Discussion: The proposed project modifies the existing table of land uses, which includes the development approval authority, and modifies and adopts new development standards for industrial development. The analysis in this memorandum was prepared to determine if these procedural and regulatory changes could result in direct or indirect physical change to the environment. . Change in Zone District Names The proposed project would change the names of the existing industrial districts within the city as shown in Table 2 as the change in name simply refers to an existing set of properties that are already zoned for industrial purposes, and no new property is being zoned for industrial use because of the proposed project.The change in names is for the public and staff to be able reference the provisions in the development code online;there would be no physical change to the environment. Additionally, MI/HI and HI are being merged into one zone now called IE.The development standards and uses allowed in MI/HI and HI have evolved over the years to a point where the two zones are nearly identical. As there is no longer any meaningful difference June 28,2021 1 Page 3 Page 793 OLACEWORKS between the two zones, the City has concluded that there is no meaningful reason to maintain two zones. Aside from the names, the proposed zone districts are consistent with the existing land use designations as established by both the existing and proposed General Plan, and no General Plan amendment is necessary for the proposed project. Table 2, Existing and Proposed Zone District Name ZoningCurrent ••• -• Zoning Industrial Park(IP) Industrial Park (IP) General Industrial (GI) Neo Industrial (NI) Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI) Industrial Employment(IE) Heavy Industrial (HI) Industrial Employment(IE) Change in Land Use Table A change of use from an existing Conditional Use Permit to proposed Minor Use Permit is not considered environmentally significant, as the Development Code requires the Director to conduct a project review and conduct a hearing to determine whether the proposed use would have any impacts on surrounding properties. The effect of changing the use permit for a particular use from a Conditional Use Permit to a Minor Use Permit results in a change in the approving authority, with no change to the required findings and conditions applicable to the use. In addition, if a new building is proposed alongside the use,then the building would also have to complete the Design Review process, consistent with current regulatory requirements. As the Design Review process is the same for both types of permits, with only the approving body being different, there is no change to the process that could result in a physical change to the environment.There is no change in the standards that would be applied, only the project consideration process. Table 3 summarizes the changes to the industrial code by chapter. Table 3, Industrial Code Changes by Chapter Zoning Code:Article Zoning Code: Zoning Code: Description Number and Name Chapter Article II: Land Use Chapter 17.14 17.14.050(Public Minimum noticing distance and Development (General Application Hearing and public increased for Minor Use Procedures Processing notice) Permit applications in NI Procedures) 17.14.060(Approving and IE from 660 feet to authority) 1,500 feet. 17.14.090(Permit • Minor Use Permit added, time limits, and Conditional Use Permit extensions,and authority edited in Table expiration) 17.14.060-1. 17.14.100 • All new entitlements expire (Modification) in 2 years instead of 5. June 28,2021 1 Page 4 Page 794 Code: OLACEWORKS Zoning Code:Article Zoning Code: Zoning Description.- .. - Number • Added new criteria for Modifications. Chapter 17.16 17.16.025(Director • Minimum noticing distance (Planning Director determination increased for Minor Use Decisions) process(with notice)) Permit applications in NI 17.16.110(Minor and IE from 660 feet to exceptions) 1,500 feet. NEW: 17.16.120 . Minor Exceptions text (Minor Use Permit) updated to reflect the other code changes. • Existing Conditional Use Permit changed to Minor Use Permit with approval by the Director. Chapter 17.20 17.20.040(Design • Updated the applicability (Planning review) provisions for Design Commission NEW: 17.20.060 Review. Decisions) (Conditional Use . New Conditional Use Permit) Permit section added with approval by the Planning Commission. Chapter 17.22 (City 17.22.020(Master • Master plan is now Council Decisions) Plan) required for any new industrial building over 450,000 sq.ft. • Traffic block network standards in 17.36.040 may be modified if there is no impact on public health, safety,or welfare. Article III:Zoning Chapter 17.26 17.26.020(Zoning • Added new industrial Districts,Allowed (Establishment of Districts established) zoning designations and Uses,And Zoning Districts) their descriptions: Neo- Development Industrial (NI)and Industrial Standards Employment(IE). • Retitled General Industrial (GI)to Neo-Industrial (NI). • Retitled Minimum Impact/Heavy Industrial (MI/HI)and Heavy Industrial to Industrial Employment(IE). June 28,2021 1 Page 5 Page 795 Code: ACEWORKS Zoning Code:Article Zoning Code: Zoning Description.- .. - Number Section Chapter 17.30 17.30.030(Allowed 0 Replaced existing industrial (Allowed Use by land uses and permit zone designations with new Base Zoning District) requirements) industrial zone designations in Table 17.30.030-1. • Added new permit designation "C"for Conditional Use Permit with approval by the Planning Commission,or, in specific cases, by the City Council. • Added new permit designation "M"for Minor Use Permit approved by the Director. • Changed most"C"s in residential/commercial and the Industrial Park district to"M." • Multiple permit-type changes for uses in the NI and IE zones,from P to either M or C. • Added new industrial uses: "E-Commerce Distribution", "Lumber Yard", "Maker Space/Accessory Maker Space"and "Manufacturing,Green Technology." • Removed/prohibited specific industrial uses: "Fuel Storage and Distribution", "Manufacturing, Heavy", "Manufacturing, Heavy Minimum Impact", "Manufacturing, Medium", "Recycling Facility,Scrap and Dismantling Facility" "Parking Facilities"and "Parcel Hubs". Chapter 17.32 17.32.020(Allowed • Added use descriptions for (Allowed Use use descriptions) all new industrial uses: "E- Descriptions) Commerce Distribution", "Lumber Yard", "Maker June 28,2021 1 Page 6 Page 796 Code: ACEWORKS Zoning Code:Article Zoning Code: Zoning Description.- .. - Number Space/Accessory Maker Space", "Manufacturing, Green Technology". Chapter 17.36 17.36.040 • Added development (Development (Development standards for accessory Standards By Base standards for maker spaces. Zoning District) industrial districts) • Require buildings design elements to be oriented toward the ROW and functional elements oriented inward or screened from public view. • Block network standards for intersection spacing, arterial blocks and two connection points for each industrial parcel to allow for better traffic flow. • Enhance requirements for outdoor seating/break areas for employees • Larger tree sizes for larger buildings. • Updated development standards for the NI and IE zones including FAR (increased by 10%). • New Building design standards including building orientation,fagade articulation, materials,and lighting. 17.38(Overlay 17.38.080(Large • Created the Large Zoning Districts) Warehouse Overlay Warehouse Overlay Zoning Zoning District) District for industrial buildings greater than 450,000 sq.ft. Article IV:Site Chapter 17.48 17.48.040(Materials . Eliminate chain link as an Development (Fences Walls and and maintenance) approved fencing type in Standards Screening) 17.48.050 industrial zones. (Requirements by . Require landscape planter land use type) for screen walls facing public street. June 28,2021 1 Page 7 Page 797 Code: ACEWORKS Zoning Code:Article Zoning Code: Zoning Description.- .. - Number • Updated fencing standards for industrial zoned properties. Chapter 17.56 17.56.050(General . Larger tree sizes required (Landscaping landscape for larger buildings. Standards) development . Updated planting standards standards) . Parking lot trees may be 17.56.060(Special waived for solar shade landscape structures. requirements) Chapter 17.64 17.64.050(Number • New, land banking option (Parking and Loading of parking spaces to preserve areas for future Standards) required) parking needs. • Parking management plan may allow different parking standards with Master Plan. • New on-site trailer queuing requirement. • New electric vehicle and charging station requirements for industrial developments. Chapter 17.66 17.66.110(Special • Changed industrial zone (Performance industrial designations to Neo- Standards) performance Industrial (NI)and Industrial standards) Employment(IE). Chapter 17.76 17.76.020 • Added new requirements (Alternative Energy (Development criteria for alternative energy Systems and for solar systems) systems and onsite energy Facilities) 17.76.030 generation for all new (Development industrial development in standards for wind NI and IE zones. energy systems) • Added an increased height allowance for freestanding and roof-mounted wind energy systems. June 28,2021 Page 8 Page 798 ACEWORKS Analysis Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines provides a checklist to cover relevant issues associated with potential development impacts by the City.The following discussion is organized around the key topics of Appendix G. It is important to note that the City's General Plan EIR and standard conditions of approval apply to all projects in the City and are not being modified as part of the proposed project. Table 4 provides a brief explanation of why the topic does not require additional analysis or result in physical changes to the environment.The industrial areas of the City are south of Foothill Boulevard and include existing development. TopicEnvironmental Aesthetics All projects involving the construction or redevelopment of a building remain subject to the design review provisions of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. No changes are proposed to the building height limits, lighting requirements, etc.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.1-1 through SC4.1-15. Additionally,the proposed code requires additional screening of industrial operations, siting and design standards of public facing elevations, and enhanced landscaping in the form of larger trees, all of which have beneficial aesthetic impacts. Agriculture and Forestry None of the industrially designated land is designated agriculture or forestry land.The northeast corner of Haven and 4th Street is designated as Farmland of Local Importance however the zoning for the site is unchanged by the proposed project.Another similarly designated parcel is south of 1-15 on Arrow and is already developed. See Figure 1. Air Quality The proposed revisions to the Development Code would not result in net increases in building square footage, development intensity, or uses beyond that currently allowed. While the maximum FAR has been increased for those parcels currently zoned HI, parcels that are currently zoned as MI/HI have no current FAR limit. Further, staff has learned from NAIOP and several industrial developers that modern industrial development intensity is primarily driven by parking requirements, queuing and onsite circulation, and landscape areas, not FAR.This proposed code update requires enhanced parking, queueing and landscaping,which may reduce the amount of land available for building area. On balance, no net increase in intensity is expected.To further protect air quality,the use table has been amended to eliminate high traffic generating uses, such as parcel sort facilities and offsite truck yards. Consequently, construction June 28,2021 1 Page 9 Page 799 and operational emissions under the proposed changes are unlikely to generated significant air quality impacts. In fact, to specifically address and improve air quality, the code update proposes eliminating high-traffic generating uses and requiring onsite renewable energy generation and additional electric vehicle chargers. Overall, the intent of adding these new standards to the development code is to reduce emissions of air pollutants by new development. All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.3-1 through 4.3-3. Biological Resources None of the industrially designated land is expected to contain significant biological resources as shown on Figure 2 of this memorandum. The proposed project does not increase the amount of building square footage or increase the development area allowed by the existing development code. As part of the project review process, project-level CEQA analysis will be conducted as required, including compliance with the City's Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.4-1 through SC 4.4-9. Cultural Resources The proposed project would not change the requirement to consider cultural resources before any project approval. Further, all projects would be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.6-1 and 4.6-2. Energy The proposed code changes would require new industrial buildings to produce renewable energy onsite to specifically offset the energy demand of the building and vehicles supporting the building. Additionally, the code changes would require increased tree coverage to reduce heat island effects, and, by extension, reduce energy costs and building energy efficiency.The City also implements the 2019 Green Building Code that also addresses energy use (RMC§ 15.04.010). All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.5-1 through 4.5-3. Geology/Soils As discussed under Air Quality,the proposed project would not result in changes to the amount of ground coverage or development potential compared to the existing Code.The design provisions required by the California Building Code to reduce or prevent impacts related to soils or seismic activity have been adopted by the City. (RMC§ 15.04.010)All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.7-1 through 4.7-15. Greenhouse Gas Emissions As discussed under Air Quality,the proposed revisions to the Development Code would not result in increases in building square footage or development intensity beyond that currently allowed.Additionally, as discussed under Energy, June 28,2021 1 Page 10 Page 800 the code specifically requires new buildings to generate renewable energy to offset all the building and transportation energy needs for the purpose of reducing the energy demands and GHG emissions associated with future projects. Building and transportation emissions typically comprise 70 to 95 percent of a project's GHG emissions. Offsetting those emissions with onsite generation of renewable energy has the potential to substantially reduce GHG emissions of future projects. IT si worth noting that staff consulted with AQMD and learned that these code provisions will help future developments meet obligations under AQMD's new WAIRE program. Consequently, construction and operational emissions of greenhouse gases would not increase with the proposed revisions and no significant impacts are anticipated from this code update.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.5-1 through 4.5-3. Hazards& Hazardous Materials The proposed changes would not add new land uses not currently allowed in the City; therefore,the current regulations and procedures related to reduction in exposure to hazards and hazardous materials would have the same mitigating effect as with the current Code. All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.8-1 through 4.8-12. Hydrology/Water Quality The proposed zone changes would not increase the amount of land coverage or development potential allowed by the existing code.Therefore,the revisions would not result in changes that could result in additional water runoff or affect water quality.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.9-1 through 4.9-10. Land Use/Planning While the proposed project would modify the code,the General Plan designation(s) remain in place, and most of the land uses would remain unchanged.The intent of the code amendment is to modernize industrial development.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4. 10-1 and 4.10-2. Mineral Resources The proposed changes would not zone land for development that was not previously considered for development. Therefore,the revisions would not affect existing mineral resources. Noise Changes to the proposed code would allow some uses to be closer to smaller roadways by 10—15 feet.This would allow the buildings to be closer to the road but would not change where parking can be developed relative to the road. Buildings closer to the roadway are likely to reduce noise to June 28,2021 1 Page 11 Page 801 adjacent development by providing a physical barrier to road noise. Further, any loading docks facing public streets will required screening, which will further reduce noice impacts of future projects. No significant impacts are expected from this code update. Additionally, all projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.12-1 through 4.12-8. Population/Housing No housing is proposed by the code update and housing is not a permitted use within any industrial zones. Public Services As discussed previously under Air Quality,the proposed revisions to the Development Code would not result in increases in building square footage beyond that currently allowed.Therefore,the proposed changes would not substantially affect public services. Furthermore,the new queuing standards will help keep trucks queues from backing up onto public streets,further reducing the public safety issues that can arise under the current code.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.14-1 and 4.14-2. Recreation No housing is proposed by the project housing is not a permitted use within any industrial zones. Transportation As discussed under Air Quality,the proposed revisions to the Development Code would not result in increases in building square footage or development intensity beyond that currently allowed.Therefore,the revisions would not result in changes that could result in additional transportation- related effects beyond the current code. Furthermore,the proposed code update includes new block and access standards as well specific transportation demand management strategies such as enhance pedestrian and bicycle facilities. By requiring new block standards, the City's street network would be augmented with new route choices, allowing drivers to shorten their trip, and reduce vehicle miles travelled.Additionally, by providing enhance pedestrian and bicycle facilities, people will have better options to move throughout the city without having to rely on automobiles,further reducing VMT.All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.16-1 through 4.16-9. Tribal Cultural Resources All development is subject to the tribal consultation and mitigation requirements of state law, nothing in the proposed project will alter this requirement. Utilities/Service Systems As noted previously,the proposed revisions to the Development Code would not result in increases in building square footage or development intensity beyond that June 28,2021 1 Page 12 Page 802 currently allowed.Therefore,the proposed changes would not affect utilities and service systems. All projects would also be subject to Standard Conditions of Approval SC 4.17-1 through 4.17-7. Wildfire The industrial area of the City is not within a wildfire zone. https:Hosfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5948/rancho cucamo E .pdf Conclusion The proposed project would change some of the land uses as shown in Table 1, revise the regulatory processes necessary to approve some industrial projects in the City, and adopt new development standards applicable to industrial projects.The primary change includes a new overlay zone for large industrial buildings. As shown in Figure 2, none of the area associated with the industrial zoning is considered biological habitat or sensitive to cultural resources and the proposed zone change would not alter the requirement to conduct site specific analysis or change the regulatory procedures that must be in place if historic or cultural resources are discovered.The existing Development Code allows for development of the entire property in the existing condition, and the proposed update would allow this to continue, only with additional steps required before approval and additional development standards intended to mitigate impacts associated with modern industrial development. Nothing in the proposed Development Code reduces the oversight by City or participation by the public on when considering new development. The elimination of uses shown in Table 1, such as fuel storage and distribution, heavy manufacturing, and recycling and dismantling facilities are specialized uses subject to a variety of regulatory permitting,from air quality to hazardous materials. Review of City records shows that there has been no request for fuel storage and distribution, and heavy manufacturing land uses in the last ten years, suggesting that the combination of public health regulations and changing market demand has made them obsolete. Without past or pending requests,the City does not believe that there will be requests for these uses in the future. While any development within the industrial area could have an impact on people,the proposed changes ensure that those impacts are lessened when compared to the current Development Code.The City can ensure that the most affected neighborhoods have an opportunity to weigh in on the project through greater public participation in the land use project because more projects will be subject to public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. The proposed changes are considered environmentally beneficial when compared to the current land development code.These land uses are already allowed in the City's Development Code. The proposed regulatory changes still allow for public consideration and the ability of the City to influence the design of future proposals. June 28,2021 1 Page 13 Page 803 PLACEWORKS Figure 1,Agricultural Lands Sphere of Influence L � � WILSON WILSON II II —� BANYAN _ �Q' BANYA�� nLJ 210 = sew W a � a j Fontar g I ��� I L BASE LINE _RanCI10 BASE LINE _ucamonga— � CHURCH '� cNUpCN ''"u flu �L� AR OW ARROW MOW IMPORTANT FARMLAND(2016)-LOCAL Rancho Cucamonga 0 Prime Farmland Sphere of Influence O Farmland of Statewide Importance Metrolink Station Unique Farmland O Grazing Land O Farmland of Local Importance O Other Land O Urban and Built-Up Land O Out of Survey Area 0 1.5 Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga,2020:ESRI.2021 Scale(Miles) Plamirlorks June 28,2021 Page 14 Page 804 PLACEWORKS Figure 2,Vegetation Types 1 ( I k BPNEF • G A.P.�Y _ _ •1 �^ CITY FONTAN:� D 1.. wv i�� ■� 4 4 / ' NwN..s E' M qr } _ a m . CITYOF UPLAND all- ry ! hwww t a •� ! ^•t ! t I �• IM� � — ` �U - P. n T !CITY Of k ! J/J �,S 1(rL!�•i rONTANA 0 r _ �..� Rancho Cucamonga Sphere of Influence Alluvial Riparian ED Chaparral O Ruderal Mixed Scrub Scale Broom Scrub Mule Fat Thicket ® Open Water FmM Nonnative Grassland Channel u Orchard-Agricultural O Disturbed Ornamental p Developed-Ornamental Ornamental-Eucalyptus Groves Developed 0 1.5 Scale(Miles) Source:ECORP,2020(Vegetation Community Surveys) Plairif"ork c June 28,2021 Page 15 Page 805 ORDINANCE 982 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO MODIFY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ESTABLISH NEW ZONING DISTRICTS, AMEND LAND USES AND DEFINITIONS AND CREATE NEW DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY, MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION THAT THE ORDINANCE IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Recitals. A. The City of Rancho Cucamonga (the "City"), has prepared Municipal Code Amendment DRC2021-00170, as described in the title of this Ordinance. Hereinafter in this Ordinance, the subject Municipal Code Amendment is referred to as "the amendment". B. The City is a municipal corporation, duly organized under the constitution and laws of the State of California. C. The City has prepared the amendment related to industrial development and for other purposes described in the staff report in support of this Ordinance, which amendment is identified in Exhibits A through O of this Ordinance. D. On the 26th day of May, 2021, the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing with respect to the amendment and, following the conclusion thereof, issued Resolution No. 21-37 recommending that the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga adopt said amendment upon further consideration given to truck queuing, rooftop solar coverage, and permitted uses within industrial zones. E. On the 16th day of June 2021, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga conducted a noticed public hearing on the amendment and concluded said hearing on that date. F. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. SECTION 2. Findings. Based upon the substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above-referenced public hearing, this Council hereby finds and concludes that the changes proposed to Title 17 (Development Code) in the amendment are consistent with the General Plan's goals, policies and implementation programs. General Plan Policy LU-3.3 recognizes the need for regional serving land uses, like industrial uses, and that these uses need immediate access to the regional transportation network that is designed to provide maximum access capabilities and permit maximum dispersal of traffic. General Plan Land Use Goal CM-5 and Policy CM-5.2 require new developments to evaluate and when needed provide necessary transportation infrastructure to mitigate for transportation impacts. General Plan Land Use Goal CM-7 supports the maintenance of an efficient and safe network of good and freight movement that supports the needs of the business community. The block networks standards proposed Ordinance — Page 1 of 99 Page 806 provide guidance to new development with some flexibility with the master plan process to develop a transportation network that will not only support individual development, but provide efficient, safe transportation infrastructure for a variety of industrial uses. Finally, General Plan Land Use Policy LU-3.4 promotes development that is sustainable in its use of land and limits impacts to natural resources, energy, and air and water quality. Solar power generation standards and EV charging stations and infrastructure help encourage clean energy use and help reduce environmental impacts related to industrial development. SECTION 3. CEQA. Planning Department Staff has determined that the project is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the City's CEQA Guidelines. The project qualifies under the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have the potential for causing significant effect on the environment. Pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(B)(3), where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The consolidation of zoning districts, changes to the entitlement process and the elimination of higher impact industrial uses from the land use table will impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. The implementation of requirements for solar collector systems for new industrial development will provide a renewable electric resource for the development and reduce dependence on non-renewable electric resources. The new standards relating to parking, access, and street circulation avoid impacts relating to queuing and ensure that vehicles can reach arterial streets and freeways in as few miles as possible. Requiring new development to install electric vehicle charging infrastructure will encourage use of electric vehicles for industrial uses, reducing GHG emissions in future developments. These requirements impose greater limitations on industrial development than exist today and will thereby serve to eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts. Each of these components, individually and cumulatively, does not result in the possibility of creating significant to cumulative effects on the environment. Future development subject to these provisions will be reviewed for CEQA compliance under separate entitlements or actions as proposed by these code updates. During the entitlement process, the applicant will be required to comply with CEQA. In reviewing each project for compliance with CEQA, an applicant may be required to submit environmental studies that analyze potential impacts such as air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, noise levels, and transportation/traffic caused by the site-specific project. On a case-by-case review of each project, the appropriate environmental document will be prepared to address project-specific impacts. Based on this evidence and all the evidence in the record the City Council hereby concurs with Planning staff's determination that that the Amendment will not have a significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. SECTION 4. The City Council hereby amends and restates in their entirety Sections 17.14.050(Public Hearing and Public Notice), 17.14.060 (Approving Authority), 17.14.090 (Permit Time Limits, Extensions, and Expiration), and 17.14.100 (Modification) of Chapter 17.14 (General Application Processing Procedures) of Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit A of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 5. The City Council hereby amends and restates in their entirety Sections 17.16.025 (Director Determination Process (with Notice)) and 17.16.110 (Minor Exceptions), and amends, restates, and retitles Section 17.16.120 (Minor Use Permit) of Chapter 17.16 (Planning Director Decisions)of Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures)of Title 17(Development Ordinance— Page 2 of 99 Page 807 Code)of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit B of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 6. The City Council hereby adds a new Section 17.20.060 entitled "Conditional Use Permit" to, and amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.20.040 (Design Review") of, Chapter 17.20 (Planning Commission Decisions) of Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit C of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 7. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.22.040 (Master Plan) of Chapter 17.22 (City Council Decisions) of Article II (Land Use and Development Procedures) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit D of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 8. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.26.020 (Zoning Districts Established) of Chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts) of Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code)of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit E of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 9. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.30.030(Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements)of Chapter 17.30(Allowed Use by Base Zoning District) of Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards)of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit F of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 10. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.32.020 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) of Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit G of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 11. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.36.040 (Development Standards for Industrial Districts) of Chapter 17.36 (Development Standards by Base Zoning District)of Article I II (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit H of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 12. The City Council hereby adds a new Section 17.38.080 entitled "Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District"to Chapter 17.38 (Overlay Zoning Districts and Other Special Planning Areas) of Article III (Zoning Districts, Allowed Uses, and Development Standards) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit I of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 13. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Sections 17.48.040 (Materials and Maintenance) and 17.48.050 (Requirements by Land Use Type) of Chapter 17.48 (Fences, Walls, and Screening) of Article IV(Site Development Provisions) of Title Ordinance— Page 3 of 99 Page 808 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit J of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 14. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Sections 17.56.050 (General Landscape Development Standards) and 17.56.060 (Special Landscape Requirements) of Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping Standards) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit K of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 15. The City Council hereby adds a new Section 17.64.130 entitled "Maintenance"to, and amends, retitles, and restates in their entirety Sections 17.64.050 (Number of Parking Spaces Required), 17.64.060 (Reductions in Parking Requirements), 17.64.070 (Parking Management Plan), 17.64.080 (Parking Requirements for the Disabled), 17.64.090 (Parking and Driveway Design and Development), 17.64.100 (Loading Area Requirements), 17.64.110 (Bicycle Parking Requirements), 17.64.120 (Electric Vehicle Parking Requirements) of Chapter 17.64 (Parking and Loading Standards) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit L of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 16. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Section 17.66.110 (Special Industrial Performance Standards)of Chapter 17.66 (Performance Standards) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit M of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 17. The City Council hereby amends and restates in its entirety Chapter 17.76 (Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) of Article IV (Site Development Provisions) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit N of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 18. The City Council hereby adds a new definition entitled "Parking Study" to be inserted into the appropriate place in Section 17.126.020 (Universal Definitions) of Chapter 17.126 (Universal Definitions) of Article VIII (Glossary) of Title 17 (Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to read as shown in Exhibit O of this Ordinance, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 19. The official Zoning Map of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is hereby amended to rename the"General Industrial (GI)"zoning district as the"Neo-Industrial (NI)"zoning district and to combine and rename the "Minimum Impact Heavy Industrial (MI/HI)" and "Heavy Industrial (HI)" zoning districts as the "Industrial Employment (IE)" zoning district. SECTION 20. Notwithstanding any contrary provision of this Ordinance or the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, a use lawfully occupying a structure within 180 days of the effective date of this Ordinance that does not conform with this Ordinance's use regulations may continue as a lawful, permitted use. The property owner bears the burden of demonstrating that any such use has been lawfully occupying the structure within 180 days of the effective date of this Ordinance. A mere change in tenant or occupant of the structure shall not affect the use's status as lawful and permitted, provided that the new tenant or occupant does not operate a substantially different use. If the use is changed to a substantially different use or is discontinued for a period of 180 continuous days, then the use shall be subject to the provisions of Chapter 17.62 of the Ordinance — Page 4 of 99 Page 809 Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code ("Nonconforming Uses and Structures") and shall thereafter comply with the then current use regulations for the district in which the structure is located, including obtaining a CUP or Minor Use Permit, as applicable. SECTION 21. Severability. The City Council declares that, should any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 22. Enforcement. Neither the adoption of this Ordinance nor the repeal of any other Ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances, which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. SECTION 23. Publication. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2021. Dennis Michael Mayor I, JANICE REYNOLDS, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2021, and was finally passed at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held on the day of , 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEMBERS: ATTEST: City Clerk Ordinance — Page 5 of 99 Page 810 EXHIBIT A Amendments to Chapter 17.14 (General Application Processing Procedures) Amended Sections: 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. 17.14.060 Approving authority. 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions, and expiration. 17.14.100 Modification. 17.14.050 Public hearing and public notice. A. Public hearing required. The following procedures shall govern the notice and public hearing, where required pursuant to this title. The designated approving authority shall hold a public hearing to consider all applications for conditional use permits, variances, major design review, tentative subdivision maps, planned communities, master plans, specific plans, zoning code/map amendments, prezoning, development agreements, and general plan amendments considered by the planning commission or city council. B. Notice of hearing. Pursuant to Government Code §§ 65090 to 65094, not less than ten days before the scheduled date of a hearing, public notice shall be given of such hearing in the manner listed below. The notice shall state the date, time, and place of hearing, identify the hearing body, and provide a general description of the matter to be considered and the real property which is the subject of the hearing. 1. Notice of public hearing shall be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the city. 2. Except as otherwise provided herein, notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owners of property within a radius of 660 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property involved in the application, using for this purpose the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the current tax assessor's records. The radius may be increased as determined to be necessary and desirable by the planning director based on the nature of the proposed project. If the number of owners exceeds 1,000, the city may, in lieu of mailed notice, provide notice by placing notice of at least one-eighth page in one newspaper of general circulation within the city. Notice of public hearing to authorize uses and activities in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) industrial zones shall be mailed to persons owning property within 1,500 feet of the property lines of the project site. 3. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed, postage prepaid, to the owner of the subject real property or the owner's authorized agent and to each local agency expected to provide water, sewerage, streets, roads, schools, or other essential facilities or services to the proposed project. 4. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted on the project site not more than 300 feet apart along the project perimeter fronting on improved public streets. 5. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted at city hall. 6. Notice of the public hearing shall be mailed to any person who has filed a written request for notice. 6 Page 811 7. In addition to the notice required by this section, the city may give notice of the hearing in any other manner it deems necessary or desirable. 17.14.060 Approving authority. A. Designated approving authority. The approving authority as designated in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny the proposed land use, development permit or entitlement in accordance with the requirements of this title. Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements) identifies recommending (R) and final (F) authorities for each permit or entitlement. In acting on a permit, the approving authority shall make all required findings. An action of the approving authority may be appealed pursuant to procedures set forth in section 17.14.070 (Appeals). B. Multiple entitlements. When a proposed project requires more than one permit with more than one approving authority, all project permits shall be processed concurrently and final action shall be taken by the highest-level designated approving authority for all such requested permits. Projects that require legislative approvals (e.g., zoning code/map amendment, general plan Amendment) may go to the city council as stand-alone items with the associated quasi-judicial approvals stopping at planning commission. C. Referral to the planning commission. At any point in the application review process, the planning director may transfer decision making authority to the planning commission at his/her discretion because of policy implications, unique or unusual circumstances, or the magnitude of the project. Decisions referred to the planning commission shall be considered at a noticed public hearing. A referral to another decision-maker is not an appeal and requires no appeal application or fee. 7 Page 812 TABLE 17.14.060-1 APPROVING AUTHORITY FOR LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Designated Approving Authority "R"_ Type of Permit or Decision "Recommending Body""F"_ "Final Decision-Making Bod " Planning Historic Planning City Director Preservation Commission Commission Council Official code interpretation F Plan check/zoning clearance F Home occupation permit F Sin permit F Temporary use permit F Tree removal permit F Uniform sin program F Similar use determination F Reasonable accommodation F Site development review F Minor exception F Minor use permit F Conditional use permit R F' F' Minor design review F Hillside development review F Large family day care permit F Mills Act R R F Landmark designation R R F Certificate of appropriateness R F Certificate of economic hardship R F Entertainment permit F Design review R F Variance R F2 F2 Adult entertainment permit R F Tentative subdivision ma see title 16 R F Planned community R R F Specific plan R R F Prezoning R R F Development Code/zoning map R R F amendment Development agreement R R F General plan amendment R R F Master plan R I R F Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area, in which case,the planning commission shall be the recommending body. 2 A variance from a development standard in the industrial zoning districts requires approval by the city council, in which case the planning commission shall be the recommending body. 8 Page 813 17.14.090 Permit time limits, extensions and expiration. A. Time limits. Unless a condition of approval or other provision of this title establishes a different time limit, any permit not exercised within two years of approval shall expire and become void, except where an extension of time is approved pursuant to this section. B. Exercising permits. The exercise of a permit occurs when the property owner has performed substantial work as determined by the planning director and the building official and incurred substantial liabilities in good faith reliance upon such permit(s). A permit may be otherwise exercised pursuant to a condition of the permit or corresponding legal agreement that specifies that other substantial efforts or expenditures constitutes exercise of the permit. Unless otherwise provided, permits that have not been exercised prior to a zoning amendment, which would make the permitted use or structure nonconforming, shall automatically be deemed invalid on the effective date of the zoning amendment. C. Permit extensions. The approval of an extension extends the expiration date for two years from the original permit date. After this initial permit extension, a final one-year extension of time may be granted pursuant to the same process as set forth in this section. 1. Process. The same approving authority that granted the original permit may extend the period within which the exercise of a permit must occur. Notice and/or public hearing shall be provided in the same manner as for the original permit. An application for extension shall be filed not less than 30 days prior to the expiration date of the permit, along with appropriate fees and application submittal materials. 2. Conditions. The permit, as extended, may be conditioned to comply with any development standards that may have been enacted since the permit was initially approved. 3. Permit extension findings. The extension may be granted only when the designated approving authority finds that the original permit findings can still be made and there are no changed circumstances or there has been diligent pursuit to exercise the permit that warrants such extension. 4. Expiration. If the time limits are reached with no extension requested, or a requested extension is denied or expires, the permit expires. D. Permit expiration for a closed business. All permits and entitlements shall expire when a business is closed for more than one calendar year. Approval of new permits and entitlements based on current requirements shall be required prior to any business activity on the site. 17.14.100 Modification. A. Any person holding a permit granted under this title may request a modification to that permit. For the purpose of this section, the modification of a permit may include modification of the terms of the permit itself, project or site design, or the waiver or alteration of conditions imposed in the granting of the permit. B. If the planning director determines that a proposed project action is not in substantial conformance with the original approval, the planning director shall notify the property owner of the requirement to submit a permit modification application to the Planning Department. C. The planning director may review and approve the permit modification application provided the proposed modifications will not cause any of the following to occur: 9 Page 814 1. A change in the character, scope, size, and/or intensity of the development and/or use; 2. A significant increase in impacts on infrastructure or traffic on roadways adjacent to or external to the proposed development and/or use; 3. A change in the external impacts on adjacent property; and 4. A reduction in the originally approved setbacks from property lines or increase in building or structure height. D. If the planning director determines that the proposed permit modification does not comply with the provisions of subsection C above, the same approving authority as the original permit shall review the permit modification application. E. A permit modification may be granted only when the approving authority makes all findings required for the original approval. 10 Page 815 EXHIBIT B Amendments to Chapter 17.16 (Planning Director Decisions) Amended Sections: 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. 17.16.120 Minor use permit. 17.16.025 Director determination process (with notice). A. Purpose. Certain administrative permits and entitlements decided by the planning director require a notice to neighboring property owners. B. Applicability. Notice for director determination shall be provided for the following applications: 1. Tree removal permit (only if six or more trees). 2. Minor exceptions. 3. Minor use permits. C. Notice of application. Notice of an application for a tree removal permit for six or more trees, minor exceptions, and minor use permits, shall be given in compliance with the requirements of this section. The notice shall specify that the application will be decided by the city following an open public comment period where comment is received on or before a date specified in the notice which shall be ten days after the date of mailing. This notice shall also include an explanation of appeal rights. 1. Notice of the filing of an application for those applications identified in subsection B of this section shall be mailed to persons owning property within 660 feet of the property lines of the project site. 2. Notice of the filing of an application for a minor use permit to authorize uses and activities in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) industrial zones shall be mailed to persons owning property within 1,500 feet of the property lines of the project site 3. Notice of the filing of an application for tree removal permits or minor exceptions shall be mailed to persons owning property adjacent to the project site. D. Decision. The director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny applications listed in this section. Decisions shall be based on standards and criteria set forth within this Code and shall be accompanied by brief, written findings and a determination. Planning director decisions listed in section 17.16.025.13 (Applicability) above may be appealed to the planning commission. 17.16.110 Minor exceptions. A. Purpose. Exceptions may be needed to certain provisions to allow creative design solutions and to accommodate unique site conditions. B. Applicability. A minor exception may be granted to modify certain requirements of this Code, as listed in Table 17.16.110-1 (Standards Subject to Exception). Exceptions do not apply to land use and are not intended to waive a specific prohibition or procedural requirement. Additionally, a minor exception may be granted for exemptions from development standards for 11 Page 816 the repurposing or reuse of industrial warehouse and other large footprint buildings for alternative uses not envisioned when the structure was originally built, provided the use satisfies any allowed use and permit requirements provided in section 17.30.030 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements). TABLE 17.16.110-1 STANDARDS SUBJECT TO EXCEPTION Standard Maximum Reduction or Increase Maximum fence/wall height 2-foot increase Minimum amount of parking or loading spaces 25% reduction* Setbacks 10% reduction Maximum lot coverage 10% increase Maximum height 10% increase 'A proposed reduction in excess of 10%for industrial uses requires the completion of a parking study prepared by the City and paid for by the applicant to ensure the reduction will not cause a significant impact on nearby streets or other properties. C. Review process. An application for a minor exception shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Public notice. The planning director shall, not less than ten days before rendering a decision, provide for public comment through notice to adjacent property owners of the pending application. E. Findings. The planning director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for an exception after finding all of the following. 1. The minor exception is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan or development agreement. 2. The proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area. 3. The proposed exception to the specific development standard(s) is necessary to allow creative design solutions compatible with the desires of the community and/or accommodate unique site conditions. 4. The granting of the minor exception will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same district, and will not be detrimental to public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. If the planning director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor exception. F. Conditions. In approving a minor exception, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. 12 Page 817 17.16.120 Minor use permit. A. Purpose. The minor use permit provides a process for director review and determination of requests for uses and activities whose effects on adjacent sites and surroundings must be evaluated. These uses and activities generally meet the purposes of the applicable zoning district but require special consideration in their design or operation to ensure compatibility with surrounding or potential future uses. It is anticipated that uses qualifying for a minor use permit only have an impact on immediately adjacent properties and can be modified and/or conditioned to ensure compatibility. B. Applicability. This section applies to land use requiring a minor use permit as designated with an W" on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). C. Review process. An application for a minor use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. The planning director is the approving authority for minor use permits. However, the planning director may also refer a minor use permit to the planning commission for review and approval pursuant to section 17.14.060.0 (Referral to the Planning Commission). D. Findings. The director shall approve, or approve with conditions, an application for a minor use permit after finding all of the following. 1. The subject site is suitable for the type and intensity of use or development proposed, and the proposed location, size, and design of the use are compatible with adjacent uses or with natural resources; 2. The operating characteristics of the proposed use, including traffic, noise, light, and other characteristics, will be in keeping with the character of the neighborhood and other adjacent uses or uses in the vicinity; 3. The proposed improvements of the site, including building design, height and bulk of buildings, setbacks, fencing, landscaping, signage size and location, are compatible with the surrounding neighborhood or area; 4. That the proposed use shall not result in conditions that would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of the community; 5. Adequate public facilities and services are available to serve the proposed use or will be made available concurrent with the proposed development; 6. Allowing the proposed use at the proposed location would be consistent with and help achieve the goals, objectives, and policies of the general plan and the development code; and 7. The project would not result in a negative effect to the City's land use inventory available for residential and economic development, consistent with the intent of the general plan land use element. If the director does not make all of these findings, then the director shall deny the minor use permit. 13 Page 818 E. Conditions. In approving a minor use permit, the director may impose any reasonable conditions to ensure that the approval will comply with the findings required, as well as any performance criteria and development standards contained within this Code. 14 Page 819 EXHIBIT C Amendments to Chapter 17.20 (Planning Commission Decisions) Amended Section: 17.20.040 Design review. New Section: 17.20.060 Conditional use permit 17.20.040 Design review. A. Purpose. This section establishes the review procedures for residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional development proposals to facilitate project review by local responsible agencies and the development/design review committees in a timely and efficient manner; to ensure that development projects comply with all applicable local design guidelines, standards, and ordinances; to minimize adverse effects on surrounding properties and the environment; and to maintain consistency with the general plan, which promotes high aesthetic and functional standards to complement and add to the physical, economic, and social character of the city. In addition, the city finds that a design review process will support the implementation of the general plan, as it stresses quality community design standards. The city further finds that the quality of certain residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial uses has a substantial impact upon the visual appeal, environmental soundness, economic stability, and property values of the city. This section is not intended to restrict imagination, innovation, or variety, but rather to focus on community design principles which can result in creative imaginative solutions for the project and a quality design for the city. It is the purpose of this section to: 1. Recognize the interdependence of land values and aesthetics and provide a method by which the city may implement this interdependence to its benefit. 2. Encourage the orderly and harmonious appearance of structures and property within the city along with associated facilities, such as signs, landscaping, parking areas, and streets. 3. Maintain the public health, safety and general welfare, and property throughout the city. 4. Assist private and public developments to be more cognizant of public concerns for the aesthetics of development. 5. Reasonably ensure that new developments, including residential, institutional, commercial, and industrial developments, do not have an adverse aesthetic, health, safety, or architecturally related impact upon existing adjoining properties, or the city in general. 6. Implement those sections of the city's general plan that specifically refer to the preservation and enhancement of the particular character and unique assets of this city and its harmonious development. 7. Minimize the effects of grading by discouraging mass grading and excessive slopes to ensure that the natural character of terrain is retained. 15 Page 820 8. Preserve significant topographic features, including rock outcroppings, native plant materials, and natural hydrology, while also encouraging improved drainage from lots directly to a street, storm drain, or through a public or privately maintained easement. 9. Limit the impact of slopes on adjacent developed properties and limit construction on identified seismic or geologic hazard areas. 10. Encourage the use of a variety of housing styles, split-level grading techniques, varied lot sizes, site design densities, maintenance of views, and arrangement and spacing to accomplish grading policies. 11. Help ensure that adequate levels of public services are provided for existing and future development in the city. 12. Encourage orderly development of residences within areas more readily served by public services. 13. Encourage the development of master planned projects that provide the service needs of the residents of these projects. 14. Encourage the use of energy conservation techniques in all new residential, mixed use, institutional commercial, and industrial development. B. Applicability. An application for design review is required for commercial, industrial, institutional, and residential projects involving the issuance of a building permit for construction or reconstruction of a structure which meets the following criteria. 1. New construction of residential projects with five or more dwelling units 2. New single or multiple building construction, on a vacant property or parcel/lot,with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined) floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 3. Structural additions to an existing building where the addition has a floor area that is 50 percent or more of the floor area of the existing building. 4. New building construction, on a developed property or parcel/lot, with an overall (or, if multiple buildings, combined) floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 5. Reconstruction projects which are greater than 50 percent of the floor area of an existing building (or, if multiple buildings, 50 percent of their combined floor area) or with a floor area of 10,001 square feet or greater. 6. Any project being proposed along a special boulevard as defined by the general plan, except for structures within projects with an approved master plan. 7. All projects which are master planned. Once the master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the city council, individual structures may be approved by the planning director. 8. All shopping centers over 10,000 square feet in size, except individual structures may be approved by the planning director where a master plan, including architectural guidelines, has been approved by the planning commission. 9. Certain projects within a hillside area are subject to review pursuant to section 17.52 (Hillside Development). 10. All projects within Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 16 Page 821 Projects of a limited size and scope that do not meet these criteria may require an application for minor design review as defined in section 17.16.130 (Minor Design Review). C. Review process. The design review procedure is outlined below. 1. Scheduling for committee review. Upon acceptance of a complete application for design review approval, a project shall be scheduled for committee review. The applicant and any persons requesting notice will be notified at least ten days prior to the committee meeting. 2. All development proposals submitted pursuant to this section are reviewed by the design review committee, which will make a recommendation on the project to the planning commission. Review and analysis by the design review committee will consider design elements, such as, but not limited to, compatibility of the project to surrounding properties, relationship of the design and layout of the project to the site, architectural design, and use of materials, grading, landscaping, screening and buffering techniques of adjacent properties, signs, and open space. The design review committee will determine if the project adequately meets city design guidelines and standards and will transmit an appropriate recommendation to the planning commission. The design review committee shall review the project design submittals and make recommendations to the planning commission based on: i. Design and layout of the proposed development is consistent with the applicable elements of the city's general plan, design guidelines of the appropriate district, and any adopted architectural criteria for specialized area, such as designated historic districts, theme areas, specific plans, community plan, boulevards, or planned developments. ii. The design and layout of the proposed development will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring, existing, or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. iii. The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood and will maintain the harmonious, orderly, and attractive development contemplated by this section and the general plan of the city. iv. The design of the proposed development would provide a desirable environment for its occupants and the visiting public as well as its neighbors through good aesthetic use of materials, texture, and color that will remain aesthetically appealing and will retain a reasonably adequate level of maintenance. 3. Proposals submitted pursuant to this section may also require review by other necessary committees as applicable (e.g., trails). D. Findings. The planning commission shall make the following findings before approving a design review application: 1. The proposed project is consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan; 2. The proposed project is in accord with the objective of this Development Code and the purposes of the district in which the site is located; 17 Page 822 3. The proposed project is in compliance with each of the applicable provisions of this Development Code; and 4. The proposed project, together with any applicable conditions, will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. E. Planning commission decision and conditions. The planning commission is authorized to approve or deny applications and to impose reasonable conditions upon such approval, as the commission may deem necessary to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses, to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare, and to enable the commission to make the findings required by section 17.20.040.D (Findings). 17.20.060 Conditional use permit A. Purpose. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to provide a public review process for the discretionary review of proposed uses and activities that require special consideration to ensure that their effects are compatible with locational, use, structural, traffic, and/or the characteristics of neighboring properties and the community. This discretionary review process is intended to ensure land use compatibility and to mitigate potential impacts or conflicts that could otherwise result from the proposed use. More specifically, a conditional use permit is intended to: 1. To consider the relationship of the use or project to the surrounding area, neighborhood, and community as a whole; 2. To determine if the project's use and location is compatible with the types of uses that are normally permitted in the surrounding area; 3. To consider the compatibility of the proposed use with the site's characteristics; 4. To evaluate the adequacy of services and facilities for the proposed use; 5. To provide an opportunity for public review and comment on the proposed use; and 6. To identify conditions and requirements necessary to comply with the basic purposes of this Code, the General Plan, and any applicable plans or regulations B. Applicability. This section applies to any land use requiring a conditional use permit as designated with a "C" on the allowed use table (Table 17.30.030-1). Any development subject to approval of a conditional use permit must comply with all applicable requirements of this Section. C. Application requirements. An application for a conditional use permit shall be filed with the planning department in a manner prescribed by the planning director with the required fee as established by city council resolution. D. Approving authority. The planning commission is the approving authority for conditional use permits, except that the approving authority for all industrial buildings with a gross floor area of 75,000 square feet or greater is the city council. The planning commission may approve, conditionally approve, or deny a conditional use permit application. In instances when an application for a conditional use permit is processed concurrently with other land use entitlements requiring action by the city council, the planning commission shall make a recommendation on the conditional use permit application to the city council. 18 Page 823 E. Findings. The approving authority shall make the following findings before approving a conditional use permit application: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the general plan 2. The proposed use is consistent with the purposes of the development code and the purposes of the applicable zoning district as well as any applicable specific plans or city regulations/standards. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints that would make conduct of the use undesirable. 4. The design, location, size and operating characteristics of the proposed use would be compatible with the existing and other permitted uses in the vicinity including transportation and service facilities. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious to detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zoning district in which the property is located. The factors to be considered in making this finding include: a. Property damage or nuisance arising from noise, smoke, odor, dust, vibration or illumination caused by the use; b. Hazard to persons or property from possible explosion, contamination, fire or flood caused by the use; and, C. Significantly increase the volume of traffic or negatively alter the pattern of traffic. 6. The proposed use will not pose an undue burden on city services, including police, fire, streets, and other public utilities, such that the city is unable to maintain its current level of service due to the use; and 7. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). F. Conditions of approval. The approving authority may impose reasonable conditions of approval to enable it to make the above findings and to ensure that the use will meet all applicable performance criteria, regulations, and standards and is compatible with surrounding uses, and to preserve the public health, safety, and welfare. G. Approval applies to land. Any conditional use permit approval shall run with the land and shall continue to be valid for the time period specified, whether or not there is a change of ownership of the site or structure to which it applies. Conditional use permit approval cannot be transferred to another site. 19 Page 824 EXHIBIT D Amendments to Chapter 17.22 (City Council Decisions) Amended Section: 17.22.040 Master plan. 17.22.020 Master plan. A. Purpose. The purpose of a master plan is to allow for the coordinated comprehensive planning of a subarea of the city in order to accomplish any of the following objectives: 1. Protect a unique environmental, historical, architectural, or other significant site feature that cannot be adequately protected by adoption of another land use zone. 2. Allow the development of an exceptional project design that cannot be built under an existing zoning district or due to constraints of existing development standards. 3. Further the implementation of specific goals and policies of the city as provided in the general plan. 4. "Plan ahead"and look beyond the limits of a particular property to solve circulation, drainage, and neighborhood compatibility problems. 5. Provide flexibility for developments beyond conventional zoning regulations to address special or unique needs or characteristics. B. Review process. 1. A master plan may be initiated by motion of the planning commission or the city council, by application of property owner(s) of parcel(s) to be affected by the master plan, or by recommendation of the planning director for any reason beneficial to the city. 2. The designated approving authority for a master plan is the city council,which shall hold a public hearing on the planning commission recommendation prior to taking action. The planning commission shall hold a public hearing and then shall provide a recommendation, which recommendation shall include the reasons for the recommendation and the relationship of the proposal to the general plan. The city council approves or denies the master plan by resolution in accordance with the requirements of this title. C. Master plan requirements. 1. A master plan shall include all of the following components: i. Physical characteristics of the site. ii. Location of structures and other significant improvements. iii. Significant natural features of the site. iv. Available public facilities. V. Capacity of existing and planned circulation systems. vi. Existing and planned uses within 1,000 feet. vii. Land within 1,000 feet of the site that is designated as state responsibility area (SRA) or wildland-urban interface fire area. 20 Page 825 viii. A boundary map of the property and a calculation of the gross land area within the proposed district. A tentative subdivision map may be substituted if the applicant proposes to subdivide the property. ix. A discussion of specific objectives and limits for development of the property which recognize and respond to identified opportunities and constraints of the master plan. X. Proposed land use and a description of how the land uses implement the general plan. A. Proposed density ranges for proposal that include housing and how the density ranges correspond to the general plan. xii. Land use plan including, but not limited to, the acreage of each land use type and number of housing units by type. The distribution of land uses shall be expressed in terms of acreage and the total number of residential units and/or square footage of nonresidential buildings allowed. xiii. A circulation plan showing existing and proposed public and private streets, pedestrian ways, trails, and related transportation access or circulation features required to serve the proposed development. 2. The master plan may include specific regulations applicable to, and a procedure for review of proposed development, within the master plan area, such as: i. Performance and development standard requirements related to setbacks, lot area, intensity of development on each lot, parking requirements, landscaping, and signs. ii. Design standards and guidelines as appropriate for the specific site and development. iii. Open space plan including protection measures for significant natural features, parks, and other site amenities. iv. A site specific wildfire protection plan. V. Types of projects that require review. vi. Documents required from developers. vii. Regulations relating to nonconforming lots, uses, structures, and signs. viii. Time phasing and sequence of development projects. 3. Pursuant to section 17.14.060 and other provisions of this title, a master plan is required for large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more. i. The purpose of the master plan for such industrial buildings is to ensure that the development does not impose significant burdens on City services and nearby businesses and residents, as well as to ensure that the development has adequate public services and infrastructure to accommodate the expected uses. In addition, the master planning process is expected to ensure that the proposed industrial development provides community benefits that may not otherwise be provided through strict application of the provisions of this title. 21 Page 826 ii. Upon recommendation by the city engineer and fire marshal, a master plan may vary or waive the traffic standards identified in section 17.36.040 if the city council determines that doing so would not frustrate the underlying purpose of the subject standard(s) or cause a significant impact on public health, safety, or welfare. D. Findings. A master plan shall not be adopted unless the following findings are made: 1. The proposed master plan is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the general plan. 2. The proposed master plan meets the applicable requirements set forth in this title. 22 Page 827 EXHIBIT E Amendments to Chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts) Amended Section: 17.26.020 Zoning districts established 17.26.020 Zoning districts established. A. Zoning district purpose. Zoning districts are established in order to classify, regulate, designate, and distribute the uses of land and buildings; to regulate and restrict the height, setbacks and bulk of buildings; to regulate the area of yards and other open spaces around buildings; and to regulate the density of population. The city is divided into zoning districts that are grouped into two categories: (a) base zoning districts and (b)overlay zoning districts. These districts are listed and described in Table 17.26.020-1 (Rancho Cucamonga Zoning Districts), along with the general plan land use designation that they implement. B. Base zoning districts. The base zoning district is the primary zoning district that applies to a property. Every parcel throughout the city has a base zoning district that establishes the primary land use type, density, intensity, and site development regulations. Base districts are grouped into six categories as follows: 1. Residential Zoning Districts. 2. Mixed Use Zoning Districts. 3. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts. 4. Industrial Zoning Districts. 5. Open Space Zoning Districts. 6. Special Purpose Zoning Districts. C. Overlay zoning districts. The Overlay Zoning Districts supplement base zoning districts for one or more of the following purposes: 1. To allow more flexibility from the standard provisions of the underlying base zone. 2. To protect unique site features or implement location-specific regulations. 3. To specify a particular standard or guideline for an area. D. In the event of a conflict between the regulations of the base zoning district and the Overlay Zoning District, the provisions of the Overlay Zoning District shall apply. 23 Page 828 TABLE 17.26.020-1 RANCHO CUCAMONGA ZONING DISTRICTS Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Residential Zoning Districts Very Low Residential. Designates areas for very low density residential use, with a VL minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and a maximum residential density of up to 2 units per gross acre. Low Residential. Designates areas for single-family residential use, with a minimum L lot size of 7,200 square feet and a maximum residential density of 4 units per gross acre. Low Medium Residential. Designates areas for low medium density single-family or LM multiple-family use with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby single-family detached neighborhoods. Residential densities range from 4 to 8 units per gross acre maximum. Medium Residential. Designates areas for medium density multiple-family use, with M site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 8 to 14 units per ross acre maximum. Medium High Residential. Designates areas for medium high density multiple-family MH use, with site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 14 to 24 units per gross acre maximum. High Residential. Designates areas for high density multiple-family use, with site H development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development. Residential densities range from 24 to 30 units per gross acre. Mixed Use Zoning District Mixed Use. Designates areas for a mix of residential and nonresidential uses, with MU site development regulations that assure development compatible with nearby lower density residential development, as well as internal compatibility among the varying uses. Commercial and Office Zoning Districts Office/Professional. Designates areas primarily for the development of OP professional/administrative offices and personal services rather than commodities. Site development regulations and performance standards are designed to make such uses relatively compatible with residential uses. Neighborhood Commercial. Designates areas for immediate day-to-day convenience shopping and services for the residents of the immediate NC neighborhood. Site development regulations and performance standards are intended to make such uses compatible to and harmonious with the character of surrounding residential or less intense land use area. 24 Page 829 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol General Commercial. Designates areas for general commercial activities and services of a more intensive nature, including but not limited to major shopping GC facilities, major service-oriented uses, major financial, and corporate headquarters that are designed to serve the city or the region as a whole and are typically located primarily along major transportation routes. Community Commercial. Designates areas for commercial activities and services on CC a larger scale. Businesses are typically auto oriented and located along major commercial corridors. Specialty Commercial. Designates areas designed to enhance the character around historic resources or sites which promote a special landmark quality or create a special ambience. Examples include specialty theme-oriented uses located adjacent SC to the Thomas Brothers Winery, which complement the existing winery structure and provide a unifying theme or the establishment of tourist-oriented specialty uses in other areas, which cater to visitors. A limited number of office uses have been included into the specialty commercial category in order to facilitate an interactive office/commercial environment. Regional Related Commercial. Designates areas for large-scale commercial RRC development that serves both local and regional needs. Sites are easily accessible from freeways and may contain a variety of goods and services, such as large-format retail, department stores, eating and drinking establishments, hotels, and motels. Commercial Office. Designates areas for activities that cater to business support and CO personal services. Uses typically include medical and health care clinics, travel agencies, insurance agencies, copy centers, and other similar land uses. Industrial Zoning Districts Industrial Park. Designates areas for industrial firms seeking an attractive and pleasant working environment and a location which has prestige value. The district IP allows light industrial uses, office and administration facilities, research and development laboratories, and limited types of warehousing, as well as support businesses and commercial service uses. Neo-Industrial. Designates areas to support a complementary mix of uses such as, research and development, light and custom manufacturing, engineering and design services, breweries, and maker spaces, as well as accessory office, retail and limited residential uses to compliment the primary use; supportive amenities and services; NI and convenient transit access. This zoning district encourages light industrial activities with low environmental impacts and supports the growth of creative industries, incubator businesses, and innovative design and manufacturing. The zoning district can allow for small scale, context sensitive warehousing, distribution and manufacturing to support small business development. Industrial Employment. Designates areas reserved for manufacturing, processing, construction and heavy equipment yards, warehousing and storage, e-commerce IE distribution, light industrial research parks, automobile and vehicle services, and a broad range of similar clean industrial practices and processes that typically generate more truck traffic, noise, and environmental impacts than would be 25 Page 830 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol compatible with office and residential uses. This zoning district prohibits non- industrial uses, except for accessory office and commercial uses (such as restaurants or convenience stores) that support the employees of the primary industrial use, and on-site caretaker units. Open Space Zoning Districts Open Space. Designates areas primarily to protect environmentally sensitive land. OS The use regulations, development standards, and criteria provide low intensity development and encourage recreational activities and preservation of natural resources. Hillside Residential. Designates areas for maintaining natural open space character through protection of natural landforms; minimizing erosion; providing for public HR safety; protecting water, flora, and fauna resources; and establishing design standards to provide for limited development in harmony with the environment. Allowed density is a maximum of 2 units per net buildable acre as determined through the Hillside Development Review process. FC Flood Control. Designates areas necessary for flood control facilities for protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. Utility Corridor. Designates areas within utility corridors in which land uses UC compatible to both the utility function and surrounding, existing, or proposed land uses are allowed. Special Purpose Zoning Districts Specific Plan. Designates areas for master planning through the adoption of a SP specific plan with unique land use and development standards for a particular project areas with a minimum of 300 acres. Planned Community. Designates areas master planning through the adoption of a PC Planned Community, which can establish unique land use and development standards for a particular project area. Planned Communities typically include less detail than specific plans and have no minimum project size requirement. Overlay Zoning Districts Senior Housing. Designates areas available for affordable rental housing units to serve the city's senior citizens. District provisions ensure high quality project design SH and establish incentives for ongoing affordability for this target group. This district can be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. Equestrian. Designates areas for the keeping of equine, bovine, and cleft-hoofed animals. Further, this district protects the ability to maintain such animals, promotes E a "rural/farm" character in an urban setting, and recognizes and encourages the educational and recreational values derived from raising and maintaining such animals. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. 26 Page 831 Zoning District Zoning District Name/Description Symbol Foothill Boulevard. Designates areas along Foothill Boulevard for special use and development regulations to implement the goals and objectives in the general plan FB for this important corridor that covers most of the length of Historic Route 66 through the city. Special regulations encourage a mix of uses, concentrate neighborhood, community, and regional-serving uses as appropriate, and accommodate future transit. Hillside. Designates sloped areas subject to special hillside development H regulations. Generally, this district applies to areas with a slope greater than or equal to 8%. This district may be combined with any residential base zoning district that meets the overlay district qualifications. HA Haven Avenue. Designates an area along Haven Avenue with unique allowed use regulations and development standards focused on high quality office opportunities. Industrial Commercial. Designates areas with an Industrial Park Base Zoning District IC to encourage and support the integration of traditional general commercial uses and special development review requirements focused on retail opportunities. LW Large Warehouse. Designates area where large industrial buildings with a gross floor area over 450,000 square feet are permitted. 27 Page 832 EXHIBIT F Amendments to Chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts) Amended Section: 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements. 17.30.030 Allowed land uses and permit requirements A. Allowed land uses. Allowed uses and corresponding permit and entitlement requirements for the base zoning districts are listed in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). Uses are organized into common categories as follows: 1. Residential uses. 2. Agriculture and animal related uses. 3. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 4. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 5. Retail, service, and office uses. 6. Automobile and vehicle uses. 7. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. B. Permit requirements. Generally, a use is either allowed by right, allowed through issuance of a conditional use permit, or not permitted. In addition to the requirements for planning permits or entitlements listed herein, other permits and entitlements may be required prior to establishment of the use (e.g., building permit or permits required by other agencies). The requirements for planning permits or entitlements identified in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) include: 1. Permitted(P). A land use shown with a "P" indicates that the land use is permitted by right in the designated zoning district, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this title (e.g., development standards) as well state and federal law. 2. Permitted with a Minor Use Permit (M). A land use shown with an "M" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a minor use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. 3. Conditionally permitted (C). A land use shown with a "C" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of a conditional use permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development standards) as well as state and federal law. 4. Not permitted (N). A land use shown with an "N" is not allowed in the applicable zoning district. Additionally, uses not shown in the table are not permitted, except as otherwise provided for in this title. 5. Adult entertainment permit (A). A land use shown with an "A" indicates that the land use is permitted in the designated zoning district upon issuance of an adult entertainment permit from the designated approving authority, subject to compliance with all applicable 28 Page 833 provisions of this zoning code (e.g., development operational standards)as well as state and federal law. C. Base zoning district names and symbols. Base zoning district names for the zoning district symbols used in the table are listed below. Specific Plan (SP) District and Planned Community (PC) District are not listed in the table as the allowed uses for those base zoning districts are determined in compliance with the adopted Specific Plan or Planned Community. • Very Low Residential (VL) • Specialty Commercial (SC) • Low Residential (L) • Regional Related Commercial (RRC) • Low Medium Residential (LM) • Commercial Office (CO) • Medium Residential (M) • Industrial Park (IP) • Medium High Residential (MH) • Neo-Industrial (NI) • High Residential (H) • Industrial Employment (IE) • Mixed Use (MU) • Open Space (OS) • Office Professional (OP) • Hillside Residential District (HR) • Neighborhood Commercial (NC) • Flood Control-Open Space (FC) • General Commercial (GC) • Utility Corridor-Open Space (UC) • Community Commercial (CC) TABLE 17.30.030-1: ALLOWED LAND USES AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS BY BASE ZONING DISTRICT Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC District Residential Uses Adult Day Care Home P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Caretaker Housing M M M M M M M P P P N N N N M M M P M P P Dwelling, Multi-Family N N P P P P P J N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Dwelling, Single- P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Family Dwelling, Two-Family N N P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Emergency Shelter N N N N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N Family Day Care M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N Home, Large (11) Family Day Care P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home, Small Guest House P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Group Residential M M M M M M M M M M M N M N N N N N M N N Home Occupation(2) P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P N N Live-Work Facility N N N N N N P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Manufactured Home(3) P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Mobile Home Park (1) M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Residential Care N M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facility Residential Care P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Home Short-Term Rental(16) P P P P P P P P P N N P P P P N P P P P P 29 Page 834 Land Use/Zoning VLJNN MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC District Single-Room N P P P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Occupancy Facility Transitional Housing P P P P N N N N N N N NNN N P N N Agriculture and Animal- Related Uses Agricultural Uses N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Animal Keeping, P P P P P P Domestic Pets(4) P N N N N N N N N N N N P N N Animal Keeping, M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N M N N Exotic Animals(4) Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Insects (4) Animal Keeping, P Livestock Animals (4) P N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N Animal Keeping, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N MINN N N N N Poultry (4) Equestrian Facility, M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Commercial Equestrian Facility, P N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Hobby Land Use/Zoning VL L LM M MH H MU OP NC GC CC SC RRC CO IP NI IE OS HR FC UC District Recreation, Resource Preservation, Open Space, Education, and Public Assembl Uses Assembly Use M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Cemetery/Mausoleum N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N Community M M M M M M M M M M M M M N P P N N M N N Center/Civic Use Community Garden M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N N N P N P P Convention Center N NJ N IN N N M M M M M M M M M C C N N N N Golf N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M M Course/Clubhouse Indoor Amusement/ N N N N N N M N M M P P P N M C N N N N N Entertainment Facility Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M C N N N N N Sports Facility—Large Indoor Fitness and N N N N N N P P P P P M P P M C N N N N N Sports Facility—Small Library and Museum I M M M M M M P P P P N P N P M N N M M M M 30 Page 835 Outdoor Commercial N N N N N N M M M M N N M M M C N N N N N Recreation Park and Public P P P P P P P N N N N N N N M M M P P P P Plaza Public Safety M M M M M M M M M M M M M MM C C N M N N Facility Resource- Related P P P P P P P N N N N N N N N N N P P P P Recreation School, Academic MMMMMMMMMMMM M MM C N N M N N Private School, Academic P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P N N P N N (Public) School, College/Univer MMMMMMMMMMMM M MM C N N M N N sity (Private) School, College/Univer MMMMMMMMMMMM M MM C N N C N N sity (Public) Schools, Specialized N N N N N N M M M M M M M M C C C N N N N Education and Training/Studio Theaters and N N N N N N M N N M N N P N N N N N N N N Auditoriums Tutoring N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N Center—Large Tutoring N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N Center—Small Utility, Transportation, Public Facility, and Communication Uses Broadcasting and Recording N N N N N N N P N P N N N P P P N N N N N Studios Park and Ride N N N N N N N M M M N N N N C P C N N N N Facility Parking Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Transit Facility N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N N N Utility Facility and Infrastructure N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C C N M M —Fixed Based Structures (5,12) Utility Facility and P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Infrastructure —Pipelines (5) 31 Page 836 Wind Energy System—Small P N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N (10) Land V L M M O N G C S RR C H U Use/Zoning L L M M H H U P C C C C C O IP NI IE OS R FC C District Retail, Service, and Office Uses Adult Day Care N N N N N N M M M M N N N M C C N N N N N Facility Adult-Oriented Business (6) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N A A A N N N N Alcoholic Beverage N N N N N N M N M M M M M M M M N N N N N Sales Ambulance N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N C P N N N N Service Animal Sales N N N N N N P N P P P P N N N N N N N N N and Grooming Art, Antique, Collectable N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Shop(13) Artisan Shop N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N (13) Bail Bonds N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Banks and Financial N N N N N N M M M P P P P P P P N N N N N Services Bar/Nightclub N N N N N N M M N M M M M M N C N N N N N Bed Breakfast Innnd M MMN N N N N N N M M N N N N N N N N N Building Materials Store N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M P N N N N and Yard Business Support N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Services Call Center N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M C N N N N Card Room N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N IN , N N Check Cashing Business (') N N N N N N P N P P N N N N P N N N � N � N N Child Day Care N N N N N N M M M M M N M M M P P N N N N Facility/Center Commercial Cannabis N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Activity Consignment N N N N N N M N M M N M N N N N N N N N N Store Convenience N N N N N N P N P P N M N N M M N N N N N Store 32 Page 837 Crematory Services(') N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N Drive-In and SalesDrive-Through N N N N N N M M M M M N M M M M N N N N N Service(8) Land V L M M ON G C S RR C H U Use/Zoning L L M M H H U P C C C C C O IP NI IE OS R FC C District Equipment Sales and N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C P N N N N Rental Feed and Tack N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Store Furniture, Furnishing, and N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Appliance Store Garden Center/Plant N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N P P P N P P Nurser Grocery Store/Superma N N N N N N P N P P P N P N N N N N N N N rket Gun Sales N N N N N N N N N M N N N N M M N N N N N Hookah Shop N N N N N N M N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Home Improvement N N N N N N P N P P P N P N M P P N N N N Supply Store Hotel N N N N N N M M N M N N M MM N N N N N N Internet Cafe N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Kennel, N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M C N N N N N Commercial Liquor Store N N N N N N M N M M M M M N M M N N N N N Maintenance and Repair, N N N N N N P N P P P N P P P P P N N N N Small Equipment Massage Establishment N N N N N N P P P P P P P P N N N N N N N (14) Massage Establishment, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Ancillary(14) Medical Services, N M M M M M M P N P P N N P P P N N N N N Extended Care Medical Services, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N General 33 Page 838 Medical Services, N N M M M M M M N M N N N N P P N N N N N Hospitals Land V L M M ON G C S RR C H U Use/Zoning L L M M H H U P C C C C C O IP NI IE OS R FC C District Mobile Hot N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Food Truck Mortuary/Funer N N N N N N N M M M N N N N N N N N N N N al Home Office, Business and N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P N N N N N Professional Office, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Accessory Pawnshop(7) N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Personal N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Services Restaurant, No Liquor Service N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P P N N N N Restaurant, N N N N N N P P P P P P P P P P C N N N N Beer and Wine Restaurant, Full Liquor N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M N N N N N Service Retail, N N N N N N P P P P P N P P M M P N N N N Accessory Retail, General N N N N N N P N P P P P P N M M C N N N N Retail, Warehouse N N N N N N P N N P P N P N P N N N N N N Club Secondhand N N N N N N P N P P N N N N N N N N N N N Dealer Shooting N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C N N N N N Range Smoke Shop(7) N N N N N N N N N M M N M N N N N N N N IN, Specialty Food Store (13) N N N N N N P N P P P P P N N N N N N N N Tattoo Shop (7) N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N Thrift Store(7) N N N N N N M N M M M N M N N N N N N N N Veterinary M N N N N N M N P P M M M N N P P N N N N Facility Automobile and Vehicle Uses Auto and Vehicle Sales N N N N N N N M N M N N P N M M N N N N N and Rental Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P N N N N N N Autobroker 34 Page 839 Auto and Vehicle Sales, N N N N N N N P P P P N P P P P N N N N N Wholesale Auto and Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Stora e'8 Auto Parts N N N N N N N N P P N N P N N P N N N N N Sales Car Washing N N N N N N N N N M M N M N M N N N N N N and Detailing Recreational Vehicle N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Service N N N N N N M M M P M N M M M M N N N N N Stations Vehicle N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N P P N N N N Services, Major Vehicle N N N N N N N M M P N N M N P P N N N N N Services, Minor Land V L M M O N G C S RR C H U Use/Zoning L L M M H H U P C C C C C O IP NI IE OS R FC C District Industrial, Manufacturing, and Processing Uses (") Commercial (Secondary/Ac N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N cessory) - Industrial Commercial (Repurposing)- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M C C N N N N Industrial E-Commerce Distribution Distribution/ Fulfillment N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Center, Small(12) Distribution/ Fulfillment N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Center, Large Parcel Sorting N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Facilities Parcel Hub Small (< N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 130,000 sq. ft. Paarcel Hub N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Lrge 35 Page 840 130,000 sq. ft. Lumber Yard N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C N N N N Maker Space/Access N N N N N M N N N N N N N N M P P N N N N ory Maker Space Manufacturing, Custom(12) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N Manufacturing, Green N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P N N N N Technology Manufacturing Light - Small(12>, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Manufacturing, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M N N N N Light - Lar e(12> Microbrewery N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Printing and N N N N N N N N N P N N N N P P N N N N N Publishing Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N P P N N N N N C C N N N N Collection Recycling Facility, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Processing Research and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Development Storage, Personal N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C N N N N Storage Facility Storage N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N C C N N N N Warehouse Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N P P P N N N N Distribution - Li ht(12) Wholesale, Storage, and N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C C P N N N N Distribution - Medium (12) Table Notes: (1) Reserved. (2) See additional regulations for home occupations in Chapter 17.92. (3) See additional regulations for mobile homes in Chapter 17.96. (4) See additional regulations for animal keeping in Chapter 17.88. (5) Utility facilities and infrastructure involving hazardous or volatile gas and/or liquid pipeline development require approval of a Conditional Use Permit. (6) See additional regulations for adult entertainment businesses in Chapter 17.86.Adult-oriented businesses are not permitted west of Haven Avenue. (7) See additional regulations for special regulated uses in Chapter 17.102. (8) See additional regulations for drive-in and drive-through facilities in Chapter 17.90. (9) Not permitted within 300 feet of residentially zoned property. 36 Page 841 (10)See additional regulations for wind energy systems in Chapter 17.76. (11)Family Day Care Home—Large requires approval of a Large Family Day Care Permit, not a Conditional Use Permit. (12)Not permitted on any parcel that is located within,or partly within,five hundred(500)feet of the Foothill Boulevard right-of-way. (13)Permitted in Industrial Park and General Industrial zoning districts when proposed in conjunction with"Commercial(Repurposing) —Industrial'. (14)Massage establishment permit required. See additional regulations for massage establishments in chapter 5.18. (16)A short-term rental must be a single family residence in zoning districts other than VL, L,and LM.See additional regulations for short-term rentals in Chapter 8.34. (17)Maximum building gross floor area for all industrial uses is 450,000 square feet.A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area. (18)Auto and vehicle storage is permitted as an on-or off-site accessory use to any manufacturing use upon issuance of a minor use permit. The minor use permit may also permit truck storage as an accessory use to manufacturing. 37 Page 842 EXHIBIT G Amendments to Chapter 17.32 (Allowed Use Descriptions) 17.32.020 Allowed use descriptions. The following list represents the complete list of allowed uses by land use classification and corresponding descriptions as used in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District) and throughout this title. Individual use classifications describe one or more uses having similar characteristics, but do not list every use or activity that may appropriately be within the classification.Allowed uses are organized into the following seven use categories as follows: • Residential uses. • Agriculture and animal-related uses. • Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. • Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. • Retail, service, and office uses. • Automobile and vehicle uses. • Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. A. Residential uses. 1. Adult day care home. Defined by state law as the provision of nonmedical care to six or fewer adults, including seniors, in the provider's own home, for a period of less than 24 hours at a time. Homes serving more than six adults are included in adult day care facility. 2. Caretaker housing. A residence that is accessory to a site with a nonresidential primary use and that is needed for security, 24-hour care or supervision, or monitoring of facilities, equipment, or other conditions on the site. 3. Dwelling, multi-family. A building designed and intended for occupancy by three or more households living independently of each other, each in a separate dwelling unit, which may be owned individually or by a single landlord (e.g., apartment, apartment house, townhouse, condominium). 4. Dwelling, single-family. A building designed exclusively for occupancy by one household on a single lot. This classification includes manufactured homes (defined in California Health and Safety Code §18007) and model homes for the first sale of homes within the subdivision. 5. Dwelling, two-family. An attached building (e.g., duplex) designed for occupancy by two households living independently of each other, where both dwellings are located on a single lot. For the purposes of this title, this definition also includes halfplexes (two attached units, each with a separate lot). Does not include accessory dwelling units. 6. Emergency shelter. A facility for the temporary shelter and feeding of indigents or disaster victims and operated by a public or nonprofit agency. 7. Family day care home, large. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi-family dwelling. The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision 38 Page 843 generally for seven to 14 children. As described in the Health and Safety Code, large day care homes may provide services for up to 14 children when specific conditions are met. 8. Family day care home, small. State-licensed facilities that provide nonmedical care and supervision of minor children for periods of less than 24 hours within a single-family or multi-family dwelling. The occupant of the residence provides care and supervision generally to six or fewer children. As described in the California Health and Safety Code, small day care homes for children may provide services for up to eight children when specific conditions are met. 9. Group residential. Shared living quarters without separate kitchen and/or bathroom facilities for each room or unit. This classification includes residential hotels, dormitories, fraternities, sororities, convents, rectories, and private residential clubs but does not include living quarters shared exclusively by a family. This category includes boardinghouses, which are defined as a building other than a hotel or restaurant where meals or lodging or both meals and lodging are provided for compensation for four or more persons. 10. Guest house. A detached structure accessory to a single-family dwelling, accommodating living and/or sleeping quarters, but without kitchen or cooking facilities. 11. Home occupation. The conduct of a business within a dwelling unit or residential site, employing occupants of the dwelling, with the business activity being subordinate to the residential use of the property. Examples include, but are not limited to, accountants and financial advisors, architects, artists, attorneys, offices for construction businesses (no equipment or material storage), and real estate sales. This category includes cottage food uses, consistent with state law. 12. Live-work facility. A structure or portion of a structure: a. That combines a commercial or manufacturing activity allowed in the zone with a residential living space for the owner of the commercial or manufacturing business, or the owner's employee, and that person's household; b. Where the resident owner or employee of the business is responsible for the commercial or manufacturing activity performed; C. Where the commercial or manufacturing activity conducted takes place subject to a valid business license associated with the premises; and d. The commercial or manufacturing activity is secondary to the residential living space. 13. Manufactured home. California Health and Safety Code § 18007 defines a manufactured home as a structure, that meets the following criteria: a. Transportable in one or more sections. b. When in the traveling mode, is eight body feet or more in width, or 40 body feet or more in length, or, when erected on-site, is 320 or more square feet. C. Built on a permanent chassis. d. Designed to be used as a residential dwelling. e. Erected with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. f. Includes the plumbing, heating, air conditioning, and electrical systems contained therein. 39 Page 844 g. This term shall include any structure that meets all the requirements of this paragraph except the size requirements so long as the manufacturer voluntarily files a certification and complies with the standards established under this part. Manufactured home includes a mobile home subject to the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Act of 1974 (42 USC section 5401 et seq.). 14. Mobile home park. Consistent with definitions of state law(Health and Safety Code section 18214), a mobile home park is any site that is planned and improved to accommodate two or more mobile homes used for residential purposes, or on which two or more mobile home lots are rented, leased, or held out for rent or lease, or were formerly held out for rent or lease and later converted to a subdivision, cooperative, condominium, or other form of resident ownership, to accommodate mobile homes used for residential purposes. 15. Residential care facility. Consistent with the definitions of state law, a residential care facility provides 24-hour nonmedical care for more than six persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes, but is not limited to, rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of medical services, extended care. When located in the low (L) and low-medium (LM) residential districts, a residential care facility shall maintain a minimum three-acre project area. 16. Residential care home. Consistent with the definitions of state law (Health and Safety Code section 1502), a residential care home is a home that provides 24-hour nonmedical care for six or fewer persons 18 years of age or older, or emancipated minors, with chronic, life-threatening illness in need of personal services, protection, supervision, assistance, guidance, or training essential for sustaining the activities of daily living, or for the protection of the individual. This classification includes rest homes, residential care facilities for the elderly, adult residential facilities, wards of the juvenile court, and other facilities licensed by the State of California. Convalescent homes, nursing homes, and similar facilities providing medical care are included under the definition of "medical services, extended care." 17. Short-term rental. A short-term rental is a dwelling unit, or any portion thereof, that is rented by the host to another party for a period of not more than 30 consecutive days in exchange for any form of monetary or non-monetary consideration, including trade, fee, swap or any other consideration in lieu of cash payment. Hosted stays, un-hosted stays, and vacation rentals are types of short-term rental. Related definitions are available in Section 8.34.010. 18. Single-room occupancy (SRO) facility. Multi-unit housing for very low-income persons that typically consists of a single room and shared bath and also may include a shared common kitchen and common activity area. SROs may be restricted to seniors or be available to persons of all ages. Subsidized versions may be supervised by a government housing agency. 19. Transitional housing. Consistent with Health and Safety Code section 50675.2, transitional housing is defined as buildings configured as rental housing developments but operated under program requirements that call for the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at some predetermined future point in time, which shall be no less than six months. 40 Page 845 B. Agriculture and animal-related uses. 1. Agricultural uses. This use category includes farms, orchards, vineyards, livestock grazing, and hydroponics, including on-site sales of products grown on site. 2. Animal keeping. Care and maintenance of animals on private property. The listing below provides a distinction between various types of animals related to allowed use provisions in Table 17.30.030-1 (Allowed Land Uses and Permit Requirements by Base Zoning District). This classification is distinct from "animal sales and grooming" and "equestrian facility (commercial or hobby)." Also see Kennel, commercial, which provides for the boarding of animals (e.g., doggie day-care). a. Domestic pets. Small animals (no larger than the largest breed of dogs) customarily kept as pets within a dwelling unit. This classification includes dogs, cats, fish, and birds (excluding large tropical birds and poultry). b. Exotic animals. Wild animals not customarily confined or cultivated by man for domestic or commercial purposes, but kept as a pet or for display, including wolf-dog hybrids, non-poisonous snakes, reptiles, and large tropical birds (including peacocks). C. Insects. Small arthropod animals confined or cultivated by man for domestic purposes including but not limited to flies, crickets, mosquitoes, beetles, butterflies, and bees. d. Livestock animals. Domesticated animals that may be kept or raised in pens, barns, houses, and pastures for private use. Livestock includes, but is not limited to, cattle, sheep, swine, pot belly pigs, goats, and equine. e. Poultry. Domesticated birds (fowl) customarily kept for eggs or meat. This classification includes chickens, roosters, ducks, geese, turkeys, guinea fowl, and Cornish game hens. 3. Equestrian facility, commercial. Commercial horse, donkey, and mule facilities including horse ranches, boarding stables, riding schools and academies, horse exhibition facilities (for shows or other competitive events), pack stations, and barns, stables, corrals, and paddocks accessory and incidental to these uses. 4. Equestrian facility, hobby. Stables, corrals, and paddocks used by the individual homeowners of corresponding property and their animals. C. Recreation, resource preservation, open space, education, and public assembly uses. 1. Assembly use. A permanent meeting facility for organizations operating on a membership basis for the promotion of the interests of the members, including facilities for business associations; civic, social, and fraternal organizations; labor unions and similar organizations; political organizations; religious organizations; professional membership organizations; and other membership organizations. 2. Cemetery/mausoleum. Land used for the burial of the dead and dedicated for cemetery purposes, including columbariums and mausoleums. Also see Mortuary/funeral home and crematory services. 3. Community center/civic use. Multipurpose meeting and recreational facility typically consisting of one or more meeting or multipurpose rooms, kitchen, and/or outdoor barbecue facilities that are available for use by various groups for such activities as meetings, parties, receptions, dances, etc. 4. Community garden. A privately or publicly owned vacant parcel of land used by the community or a neighborhood for the growing of fruits, vegetables, and culinary herbs 41 Page 846 for personal consumption and/or to be offered for sale on site or at a local certified farmers' market. 5. Convention center. A large building designed to hold a convention, where individuals and groups gather to promote and share common interests. Convention centers typically offer sufficient floor area to accommodate several thousand attendees. Convention centers typically have at least one auditorium and may also contain concert halls, lecture halls, meeting rooms, and conference rooms. Some large resort-area hotels include a convention center. 6. Golf course%lubhouse. A golf course and accessory facilities and uses including clubhouses with bar and restaurant, locker and shower facilities, driving ranges, "pro shops" for on-site sales of golfing equipment, and golf cart storage and sales facilities. 7. Indoor amusement/entertainment facility. An establishment providing amusement and entertainment services in an indoor facility for a fee or admission charge, including, but not limited to, dance halls, ballrooms, bowling alleys, laser tag, inflatable playgrounds, trampoline parks, escape room venues and electronic game arcades, as primary uses. Four or more electronic games or coin-operated amusements in any establishment, or premises where 50% or more of the floor area is occupied by amusement devices, are considered an amusement device arcade as described above; three or less machines are not considered a land use separate from the primary use of the site. 8. Indoor fitness and sports facility, large. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building greater than 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include bowling alleys, billiard parlors, ice/roller skating rinks, indoor racquetball courts, indoor climbing facilities, soccer areas, athletic clubs, and health clubs. This use classification also includes studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet, yoga, martial arts, and fitness studios. 9. Indoor fitness and sports facility, small. An establishment predominantly for participant sports and health activities conducted entirely within an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. Typical uses include studio-style facilities such as dance/ballet, yoga, martial arts, and fitness studios but may also include uses described in "indoor fitness and sports facilities, large" if they are in an enclosed building less than or equal to 2,500 square feet. 10. Library and museum. A public or quasi-public facility including aquariums, arboretums, art exhibitions, botanical gardens, historic sites and exhibits, libraries, museums, and planetariums, which are generally noncommercial in nature. 11. Outdoor commercial recreation. Facility for various outdoor participant sports and types of recreation where a fee is charged for use (e.g., amphitheaters, amusement and theme parks, golf driving ranges, health and athletic club with outdoor facilities, miniature golf courses, skateboard parks, stadiums and coliseums, swim and tennis clubs, water slides, zoos). 12. Park and public plaza. A public park including playgrounds and athletic fields/courts and public plazas and outdoor gathering places for community use. If privately owned and restricted to the public (e.g., require payment of fee), the same facilities are included under the definition of"outdoor commercial recreation." 13. Public safety facility. Facility operated by public agencies including fire stations, other fire prevention and firefighting facilities, and police and sheriff substations and headquarters, including interim incarceration facilities. 42 Page 847 14. Resource-related recreation. Facility related to passive recreation in open space areas including bicycle and pedestrian trails, picnic areas, parking areas, and interpretive centers. 15. School, academic (private). Any privately owned and operated elementary school, middle school, secondary school, high school, or other institution providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. This listing also includes a private school operating under a charter from the local school district and not managed directly by the governing body of the public school district (e.g., school board). 16. School, academic (public). Public elementary schools, middle schools, secondary schools, high schools, and any other public school providing academic instruction for students from kindergarten through 12th grade. 17. School, college/university (private). Any privately owned college or university, including medical schools, law schools, and other instruction of higher education, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 18. School, college/university (public). Public community colleges, colleges, and universities, including dorms, offices, facility maintenance yards, offices, and similar supportive functions. 19. School, specialized education and training. Specialty schools for instructing and training students in a variety of specialized programs, including, but not limited to, computers and electronics training, drama, driver educational, language, music. Includes professional, vocational, and trade schools of a nonindustrial nature (e.g., culinary, cosmetology, arts and media, accounting and finance, health and dental including nursing, legal, psychology, and technology). 20. Theater and auditorium. An indoor facility for public assembly and group entertainment, other than sporting events (e.g., civic theaters, facilities for "live" theater and concerts, exhibition and convention halls, motion picture theaters, auditoriums). Does not include outdoor theaters, concert and similar entertainment facilities, and indoor and outdoor facilities for sporting events; see Outdoor commercial recreation. 21. Tutoring center, large. An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with more than ten instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. 22. Tutoring center, small. An indoor facility where instructors teach, coach, or educate students with ten or fewer instructors and/or students using the facility at any given time. D. Utility, transportation, public facility, and communication uses. 1. Broadcasting and recording studio. Commercial and public communications uses including radio and television broadcasting and receiving stations and studios, with facilities entirely within buildings. Does not include transmission and receiving apparatus such as antennas and towers. 2. Park and ride facility. A designated area where a vehicle may be left in order for the driver to carpool with other commuters or to ride public transit. 3. Parking facility. A parking lot or parking structure used for parking motor vehicles where the facility is the primary use of the site. Parking structures and lots that are developed in conjunction with another primary use of the site to satisfy the on-site parking requirements for the development are not included in this definition. 4. Transit facility. A maintenance and service center for the vehicles operated in a mass transportation system. Includes buses, taxis, railways, monorail, etc. 43 Page 848 5. Utility facility and infrastructure, fixed-base structures. Fixed-base structures and facilities serving as junction points for transferring utility services from one transmission voltage to another or to local distribution and service voltages. These uses include any of the following facilities that are not exempted from land use entitlements by Government Code section 53091: electrical substations and switching stations, natural gas regulating and distribution facilities, public water system wells, treatment plants and storage, telephone switching facilities, wastewater treatment plants, settling ponds, and disposal fields. These uses do not include office or customer service centers (classified in offices) or equipment and material storage yards. 6. Utility facility and infrastructure, pipelines. Pipelines for potable water, reclaimed water, natural gas, and sewage collection and disposal, and facilities for the transmission of electrical energy for sale, including transmission lines for a public utility company. Also includes telephone, telegraph, cable television, and other communications transmission facilities utilizing direct physical conduits. 7. Wind energy system, small. A machine which can convert kinetic energy in wind into a usable form of electrical or mechanical energy intended primarily for on-site consumption but may transfer excess energy into the electrical grid. E. Retail, service, and office uses. 1. Adult day care facility. State-licensed facility that provides nonmedical care and supervision for more than six adults for periods of less than 24 hours, with no overnight stays. 2. Adult-oriented business. a. Adult bookstore or adult video store. A commercial establishment which has as a significant or substantial portion of its stock-in-trade or derives a significant or substantial portion of its revenues or devotes a significant or substantial portion of its interior business or advertising to the sale, rental for any form of consideration, of any one or more of the following: i. Books, magazines, periodicals, or other printed matter or photographs, films, motion pictures, videocassette tapes, digital video discs, slides, tapes, records, compact discs, or other forms of visual or audio representations which are characterized by an emphasis upon the depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. ii. Instruments, devices, or paraphernalia which are designed for use or marketed primarily for stimulation of human genital organs or for sadomasochistic use or abuse of themselves or others. b. Adult cabaret. A nightclub, theater, concert hall, auditorium, bar, or other similar establishment that regularly features live or media presentations of performances by topless or bottomless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, or similar entertainers where such performances are distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. C. Adult motel. A motel, hotel or similar commercial establishment which: i. Offers public accommodations, for any form of consideration, which provides patrons with closed-circuit television transmissions, films, motion pictures, videocassettes, DVDs, CDs, slides, or other photographic reproductions which are characterized by the depiction or description of 44 Page 849 specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas and which advertise the availability of this sexually oriented type of material by means of a sign visible from the public right-of-way, or by means of any off- premises advertising including but not limited to, newspapers, magazines, pamphlets or leaflets, radio or television; ii. Offers a sleeping room for rent for a period of time less than ten hours; or iii. Allows a tenant or occupant to sub-rent the sleeping room for a time period of less than ten hours. d. Adult news rack. Any coin-operated machine or device that dispenses material substantially devoted to the depiction of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. e. Adult theater. An enclosed or unenclosed building, to which the public is permitted or invited, used for presenting any form of audio or visual material, and in which a substantial portion of the total presentation time is devoted to the showing of material which is distinguished or characterized by an emphasis on depiction or description of specified sexual activities or specified anatomical areas. f. Adult viewing area. An area in any adult book and/or novelty store, cabaret, theater, motion picture arcade or other adult entertainment business, where a patron or customer would ordinarily be positioned for the purpose of viewing or watching a performance, picture show, or film. g. Bathhouse. An establishment or business that provides the services of baths of all kinds, including all forms and methods of hydrotherapy during which specified anatomical areas are displayed or specified sexual activity occurs. 3. Alcoholic beverage sales. The retail sale of beverages containing alcohol for off- site consumption subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC)as an off-sale establishment. On-site alcoholic beverage sales are included in the definitions for bar/nightclub and restaurant. 4. Ambulance service. Emergency medical care and transportation, including incidental storage and maintenance of vehicles. 5. Animal sales and grooming. Retail sales of domestic and exotic animals, bathing and trimming services, and boarding of said animals for a maximum period of 72 hours conducted entirely within an enclosed building with no outdoor use. Boarding for periods longer than 72 hours is considered a kennel. 6. Art, antique, collectable shop. Retail sales uses including antique shops, art galleries, curio, gift, and souvenir shops, and the sales of collectible items including sports cards and comic books. Stores selling handcrafted items that are produced on the site are defined separately as artisan shops. 7. Artisan shop. A retail store selling art glass, ceramics, jewelry, and other handcrafted items and supplies needed to create finished items, where the facility includes an area for the crafting of the items being sold. 8. Bail bonds. A business providing a bond or obligation on behalf of a prisoner to insure the prisoner's appearance in court at the return of the writ. 9. Banks and financial services. Financial institutions such as banks and trust companies, credit agencies, holding (but not primarily operating) companies, lending and thrift institutions, and investment companies. Freestanding exterior automated teller machines (ATM) are considered an accessory use and not part of this definition. 45 Page 850 10. Bar/nightclub. Any bar, cocktail lounge, discotheque, or similar establishment, which may also provide live entertainment (e.g., music and/or dancing, comedy, subject to an entertainment permit) in conjunction with alcoholic beverage sales. These facilities do not include bars that are part of a larger restaurant. Includes bars, taverns, pubs, and similar establishments where any food service is subordinate to the sale of alcoholic beverages. Bars and nightclubs may include outdoor food and beverage areas. 11. Bed and breakfast inn. A residential structure with one family in permanent residence with up to six bedrooms rented for overnight lodging, where meals may be provided subject to applicable health department regulations.A bed and breakfast inn with more than six guest rooms is considered a hotel or motel and is included under the definition of hotels and motels. 12. Building materials store and yard. A retail establishment selling lumber and other large building materials, where most display and sales occur indoors. Includes stores selling to the general public, even if contractor sales account for a major proportion of total sales. Includes incidental retail ready-mix concrete operations, except where excluded by a specific zoning district. Establishments primarily selling electrical, plumbing, heating, and air conditioning equipment and supplies are classified in wholesale, storage, and distribution (heavy, light and medium). Hardware stores are listed in the definition of"retail, general," even if they sell some building materials. Also see Home improvement supply store for smaller specialty stores. 13. Business support services. Establishments primarily within buildings, providing other businesses with services such as maintenance, repair and service, testing, rental, etc. Support services include, but are not limited to: a. Equipment repair services (except vehicle repair, see Vehicle services); b. Commercial art and design (production); C. Computer-related services (rental, repair); d. Copying, quick printing, and blueprinting services (other than those defined as printing and publishing); e. Equipment rental businesses within buildings (rental yards are storage yards); f. Film processing laboratories; g. Heavy equipment repair services where repair occurs on the client site; h. Janitorial services; i. Mail advertising services (reproduction and shipping); j. Mail box services and other"heavy service" business services; k. Outdoor advertising services; and I. Photocopying and photofinishing. 14. Call center. An office equipped to handle a large volume of calls, especially for taking orders or servicing customers. 15. Card room.A gambling establishment that offers card games for play by the public. 16. Check cashing business. An establishment that, for compensation, engages in the business of cashing checks, warrants, drafts, money orders, or other commercial paper serving a similar purpose. Also includes establishments primarily engaged in cashing payroll or personal checks for a fee or advancing funds on future checks. This 46 Page 851 classification does not include a state or federally chartered bank, savings association, credit union, or similar financial institution (see Banks and financial services). 17. Child-care facility/center. A facility installed, operated, and maintained for the nonresidential care of children as defined under applicable state licensing requirements for the facility. Such facilities include, but are not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day care facilities, or school-age child-care centers as defined in this title. 18. Commercial cannabis activity. Any location providing for the cultivation, possession, manufacture, distribution, processing, storing, laboratory testing, packaging, labeling, transportation, delivery or sale of cannabis and cannabis product for medical, non-medical, or any other purpose and includes the activities of any business licensed by the state or other government entity under Division 10 of the California Business and Professions Code, or any provision of state law that regulates the licensing of cannabis businesses. Commercial cannabis activity does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, or transportation of cannabis by a qualified patient for his or her personal medical use so long as the qualified patient does not provide, donate, sell or distribute cannabis to any other person. Commercial cannabis activity also does not include the cultivation, possession, storage, manufacturing, transportation, donation or provision of cannabis by a primary caregiver, exclusively for the personal medical purposes of no more than five specified qualified patients for whom he or she is the primary caregiver, but who does not receive remuneration for these activities except for compensation in full compliance with California Health and Safety Code section 11362.765. 19. Consignment store. A retail store where goods are placed on consignment, which is the act of placing goods in the hands of another, while still retaining ownership, until the goods are sold. 20. Convenience store. An easy access retail store of 5,000 square feet or less in gross floor area, which carries a range of merchandise oriented to convenience and travelers' shopping needs. These stores may be part of a service station or an independent facility. 21. Crematory services. An establishment providing services involving the care, preparation, and disposition of human and/or animal remains by means of cremation. Uses typically include, but are not limited to, crematories and crematories with embalming services. 22. Drive-in and drive-through sales and service. A use where a customer is permitted or encouraged, either by the design of physical facilities or by the service and/or packaging procedures offered, to be served while remaining seated within an automobile including, but not limited to, drive-through food, financial services, and automatic car washes. 23. Equipment sales and rental. Service establishments with outdoor storage/rental yards, which may offer a wide variety of materials and equipment for rental (e.g., construction equipment). 24. Feed and tack store. A retail store selling animal food and equestrian supplies. 25. Furniture, furnishing, and appliance store. A store engaged primarily in selling the following products and related services, including incidental repair services: draperies, floor coverings, furniture, glass and chinaware, home appliances, home furnishings, home sound systems, interior decorating materials and services, large musical instruments, lawn furniture, movable spas and hot tubs, office furniture, other household electrical and gas appliances, outdoor furniture, refrigerators, stoves, and televisions. 47 Page 852 26. Garden center/plant nursery. Establishments providing for the cultivation and sale of ornamental trees, shrubs, and plants, including the sale of garden and landscape materials (packaged and/or bulk sale of unpackaged materials) and equipment. 27. Grocery store/supermarket. A retail business where the majority of the floor area open to the public is occupied by food products packaged for preparation and consumption away from the site of the store. Such uses may include up to ten percent of floor area for alcohol sales. These full-service businesses do not typically have limited hours of operation. 28. Gun sales. A business whose primary use is the sale of firearms, ammunition and related materials. 29. Home improvement supply store. An establishment (retail or wholesale) that sells kitchen, bath, carpeting, and other home-oriented supplies. Other retail uses are permitted if accessory to the primary use. These uses may include an expansive showroom. This use classification is a subcategory of the larger building materials stores and yards use classification and may be combined with or separate from such uses. 30. Hookah shop. Any facility or location whose business operation includes as an outdoor accessory use the smoking of tobacco or other substances through one or more pipes (commonly known as a hookah, waterpipe, shisha, or narghile) designed with a tube passing through an urn of water that cools the smoke as it is drawn through it, including but not limited to establishments known variously as hookah bars, hookah lounges, or hookah cafes. 31. Hotel. A facility with guest rooms or suites rented to the general public for transient lodging (less than 30 days). Hotels provide access to most guest rooms from an interior walkway and typically include a variety of services in addition to lodging, for example, restaurants, meeting facilities, personal services, etc. A hotel also includes accessory guest facilities such as swimming pools, tennis courts, indoor athletic facilities, accessory retail uses, etc. 32. Internet cafe. A cafe whose customers sit at computer terminals or bring portable computers and log on to the Internet while they eat and drink. 33. Kennel, commercial. A facility that provides boarding of animals as the primary use of the facility. May also include daytime boarding and activity for animals (e.g., "doggie day-care") and ancillary grooming facilities. Also see Animal sales and grooming. 34. Liquor store.A retail establishment which has 50% or more of the shelving or gross floor area devoted to the public display and sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. 35. Maintenance and repair, small equipment. Establishments providing on-site repair and accessory sales of supplies for appliances, office machines, home electronic/mechanical equipment, bicycles,tools, or garden equipment, conducted entirely within an enclosed building. Does not include maintenance and repair of vehicles. 36. Massage establishment. Any establishment where customers can receive a massage either as a primary or accessory function and where all massage therapists and practitioners are certified by the California Massage Therapy Council. 37. Medical services, extended care. Residential facilities providing nursing and health-related care as a primary use with inpatient beds, such as board and care homes, convalescent and rest homes, extended care facilities, and skilled nursing facilities. Long- term personal care facilities that do not emphasize medical treatment are included under Residential care home. 48 Page 853 38. Medical services, general. Facility primarily engaged in providing outpatient medical, mental health, surgical, and other personal health services, but which is separate from hospitals, including medical and dental laboratories, medical, dental, and psychiatric offices, outpatient care facilities, and other allied health services. Counseling services by other than medical doctors or psychiatrists are included under Office, business and professional. 39. Medical services, hospitals. Hospitals and similar facilities engaged primarily in providing diagnostic services and extensive medical treatment, including surgical and other hospital services. These establishments have an organized medical staff, inpatient beds, and equipment and facilities to provide complete health care. May include on-site accessory clinics and laboratories, accessory retail uses (see the separate definition of "retail, accessory"), and emergency heliports. 40. Mobile hot food truck. Any vehicle, as defined in Vehicle Code section 670, which is equipped and used for retail sales of prepared prepackaged or unprepared unpackaged food or foodstuffs of any kind. For the purposes of this section, a mobile food vehicle shall also include any trailer or wagon equipped and used as described in this paragraph and pulled by a vehicle. 41. Mortuary/funeral home. A funeral home and parlor, where the deceased are prepared for burial or cremation and funeral services may be conducted. This use does not include crematorium, which is a separate use classification. 42. Office, accessory. An office that is incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use (part of the same tenant space or integrated development). The qualification criteria for this definition is that the floor area of the accessory office use shall not exceed 50% of the total net habitable or leasable floor area of the tenant space for a single-use development or the combined floor area of an integrated development for a mixed-use project. 43. Office, business and professional. This use listing includes offices of administrative businesses providing direct services to consumers (e.g., insurance companies, utility companies), government agency and service facilities (e.g., post office, civic center), professional offices (e.g., accounting, attorneys, public relations), and offices engaged in the production of intellectual property (e.g., advertising, architecture, computer programming). This use does not include medical offices (see Medical services, general); temporary offices, or offices that are incidental and accessory to another business or sales activity that is the primary use (see Office, accessory). Outdoor storage of materials is prohibited. 44. Pawnshop. Any room, store, building, or other place in which the business of pawn brokering, or the business of lending money upon personal property, pawns, or pledges, or the business of purchasing articles from vendors or their assignees at prices agreed upon at or before the time of such purchase, is engaged in, carried on, or conducted. 45. Personal services. Establishments providing nonmedical services as a primary use, including, but not limited to, barber and beauty shops (including permanent makeup), weight loss clinics, day spas, spiritualist reading or astrology forecasting, clothing rental, dry cleaning pickup stores with limited equipment, home electronics and small appliance repair, laundromats (self-service laundries), shoe repair shops, and tailors. These uses may also include accessory retail sales of products related to the services provided. This use classification does not include massage or tattoo establishments, which are separately classified herein. 49 Page 854 46. Restaurant. A retail business selling food and beverages prepared and/or served on the site, for on- or off-premises consumption. Includes eating establishments where customers are served from a walk-up ordering counter for either on- or off-premises consumption and establishments where most customers are served food at tables for on- premises consumption but may include providing food for take-out. Also includes coffee houses and accessory cafeterias as part of office and industrial uses. Restaurants are divided into three categories as follows: a. Restaurant, no liquor service. Restaurants that do not serve liquor, including fast food establishments. b. Restaurant, beer and wine. Restaurants with liquor services limited to beer and wine for on-site consumption. May also include the brewing of beer as part of a brewpub or micro-brewery. c. Restaurant, full liquor service. Restaurants with a full range of liquor service, including beer, wine, and distilled spirits, all for on-site consumption. 47. Retail, accessory. The retail sales of various products and services (including food service) in a subtenant store, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area that is located within a building occupied by a primary tenant such as a health care facility, hotel, office building, or department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. These uses include, but are not limited to: a. Pharmacies, gift shops, and food services within a health care facility; b. Travel services, convenience stores, and food services within a hotel; c. Food services within an office building; and d. Food services and banking within a department store, supermarket, or warehouse store. The floor area of the subtenant store/unit, space, or other clearly defined/dedicated area occupied by the retail, accessory use shall not exceed 25% of the gross floor area of the primary tenant. 48. Retail, general. Stores and shops selling single and multiple lines of merchandise. These stores and lines of merchandise include, but are not limited to, bakeries (all production in support of on-site sales), clothing and accessories, collectibles, department stores, drug and discount stores, dry goods, fabrics and sewing supplies, florists and houseplant stores (indoor sales, only; outdoor sales are plant nurseries and included in the definition of"garden center/plant nursery"), general stores, gift shops, hardware, hobby materials, musical instruments, parts and accessories, newsstands, pet supplies specialty shops, sporting goods and equipment, stationery, and variety stores. 49. Retail, warehouse club. Retail stores that emphasize the packaging and sale of products in large quantities or volumes, some at discounted prices. Sites and buildings are usually large and industrial in character. Patrons may be required to pay membership fees. 50. Secondhand dealer. Any business where the primary or ancillary use includes buying, selling, trading, accepting for sale on consignment, accepting for auctioning, or auctioning secondhand tangible personal property such as "cash for gold." This use classification does not include a "coin dealer" or participants at gun shows or events, pawnshops or secondhand stores. 51. Shooting range. An establishment in which the primary use is an enclosed firing range with targets for rifle or handgun practice, training, or both. The establishment may include an ancillary retail space for a business that is engaged in the sale, transfer, 50 Page 855 exchange, leasing or vending of firearms, ammunition and/or related materials. The ancillary retail component may not exceed 25% of the gross floor area and may not engage in businesses related to the operation of pawnshops, secondhand stores or thrift stores as defined in this title. 52. Smoke shop. An establishment that either devotes more than 15% of its total floor area to smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia or devotes more than a two-foot by four-foot(two feet in depth maximum)section of shelf space for display for sale of smoking, drug, and/or tobacco paraphernalia. 53. Specialty food store. A store selling specialty food ingredients, which typically preserve, emulsify, color, help process, and in some cases add an extra health dimension to produced food. 54. Tattoo shop. Any establishment that engages in the business of tattooing and/or branding human beings. 55. Thrift store. A retail establishment selling secondhand goods donated by members of the public. 56. Veterinary facility. Veterinary facility that is primarily enclosed, containing only enough cage arrangements as necessary to provide services for domestic and exotic animals requiring acute medical or surgical care with accessory outdoor use that provides long-term medical care. Grooming and boarding of animals is allowed only if accessory to the facility use. F. Automobile and vehicle uses. 1. Auto and vehicle sales and rental. Retail establishments selling and/or renting automobiles, trucks, and vans. Includes the sales and rental of mobile homes, recreational vehicles, and boats. May also include repair shops and the sales of parts and accessories, incidental to vehicle dealerships. Does not include the sale of auto parts/accessories separate from a vehicle dealership (see Auto parts sales), bicycle and moped sales (see Retail, general), tire recapping establishments (see Vehicle services, major), businesses dealing exclusively in used parts (see Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling), or service station, all of which are separately defined. 2. Auto and vehicle sales, autobroker. Establishments providing the service of arranging, negotiating, assisting or effectuating, for a fee or compensation, the purchase of a new or used vehicle, not owned by the broker for a person(s). This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 3. Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. Wholesale establishments selling new and used vehicles to licensed commercial auto dealers. This use, consistent with the licensing guidelines from the California Department of Motor Vehicles does not allow for the storage or display of vehicles on site. 4. Auto and vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of operative and inoperative vehicles for limited periods of time. Includes, but is not limited to, storage of parking tow- aways, impound yards,fleet yards and storage lots for automobiles(excluding recreational vehicles), trucks, and buses. Does not include retail sales (see Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale). 5. Auto parts sales. Stores that sell new automobile parts, tires, and accessories. May also include minor parts installation (see Vehicle services). Does not include tire recapping establishments, which are found under Vehicle services, major, or businesses 51 Page 856 dealing exclusively in used parts, which are included under Auto and vehicle sales, wholesale. 6. Car washing and detailing. Permanent, drive-through, self-service, and/or attended car washing establishments, including fully mechanized facilities. May include detailing services. Temporary car washes (e.g., fundraising activities generally conducted at a service station or other automotive-related business, where volunteers wash vehicles by hand and the duration of the event is limited to one day) are not part of this use classification. 7. Recreational vehicle storage. Facilities for the storage of recreational vehicles for limited periods of time. 8. Service station. A retail business selling gasoline or other motor vehicle fuels. May include a convenience store. Vehicle services which are incidental to fuel services are included under Vehicle services, minor. 9. Vehicle services, major. The repair, alteration, restoration, towing, painting, or finishing of automobiles, trucks, recreational vehicles, boats, and other vehicles as a primary use, including the incidental wholesale and retail sale of vehicle parts as an accessory use. This use includes major engine and/or transmission repair and bodywork- repair facilities dealing with entire vehicles; such establishments typically provide towing, collision repair, other bodywork, and painting services and may also include tire recapping establishments. 10. Vehicle services, minor. Minor facilities specialize in limited aspects of repair and maintenance (e.g., muffler and radiator shops, quick-lube, smog check, and tires). Does not include repair shops that are part of a vehicle dealership on the same site (see Auto and vehicle sales) or automobile dismantling yards, which are included under Recycling facility, scrap and dismantling. G. Industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses. 1. Commercial (secondary/accessory)—Industrial. On-site, retail sales of products within an industrial building (the subject building) for walk-in customers and/or will call customers who order products via the internet/telephone or at a separate location such as a retail store. This use is secondary/accessory to the primary industrial use(s) that occur on-site and/or within the subject building, such as manufacturing, wholesale, storage, and distribution. The products available for retail sale shall be limited to products that are manufactured on-site or within the subject building, that are primarily sold on a wholesale basis, and/or are stored in, and/or distributed from, the subject building. Such products include, but are not limited to: a. Personal/home electronic equipment and accessories; b. Home improvement materials (tile,flooring, carpet, wall covering, etc.); and C. Automotive accessories (wheels, tires, engine components, etc.). This classification allows, but does not require, physical retail and/or display/showroom space within the subject building. If such space is proposed/required, then the floor area used for that purpose shall only occupy the floor area that was originally designated for the office of the subject building, or 25 percent of the gross floor area of the subject building, whichever is less, and shall be subject to the parking requirements for retail uses as described in Table 17.64.050-1 — Parking Requirements by Land Use. Use of, and/or expansion into, areas of the building previously designated for storage, warehousing, or manufacturing is only permitted if it is demonstrated that the number of parking stalls that exist on-site for the overall subject building complies with the parking requirements 52 Page 857 described in Table 17.64.050-1. A use not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 2. Commercial (re-purposing)—Industrial. A set of multiple commercial uses operating together as subtenants in a building that was originally designed for a single industrial tenant such as a warehouse, or a single commercial tenant such as a department store. This land use classification applies only to commercial uses that, individually, could not utilize the entire floor space of the subject building and, therefore, would not operate as the sole, primary tenant of the building. This classification does not apply to single tenants/uses that could utilize the entire floor space of the subject building. Characteristics of this land use classification include, but are not limited to: a. An open floor plan with tenant demising walls that do not extend to the ceiling; b. Exterior wall signs that only provide identification of the subject building; c. Common, non-exclusive floor area within the interior of the building, and the exterior in the vicinity of the building, for use by the customers of all tenants; d. Tenant spaces with no direct access to the exterior of the building; and e. Shared parking. All proposals for re-purposing buildings shall require the submittal of a conditional use permit for review and approval by the planning director, and the submittal of a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance by the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director. With the exception of specific uses identified in Table 17.30.030-1, a use that is not permitted to operate as a principal use, such as a marijuana dispensary, is not permitted within this land use classification. A use that requires a conditional use permit, entertainment permit, or adult entertainment permit in order to operate as a principal use is subject to the same permitting requirements within this land use classification. 3. E-Commerce Distribution. Activities that involve the buying, selling, and distribution of products and associated services over the internet or through mobile applications. Products are transported using freight trucks and stored in warehouses or fulfillment centers to then be distributed to designated shipping locations using delivery trucks. Includes the following categories of e-commerce distribution: a. Distribution/Fulfillment Center. A fulfillment center or similar use's primary purpose is storage and distribution (non-sort) of e-commerce products to consumers or end-users, either directly or through a parcel hub. These facilities shall have a minimum ceiling height of 24 feet. 1) Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Large. A distribution/fulfillment center with a minimum gross floor area over 50,000 square feet. 2) Distribution/Fulfillment Center, Small. A distribution/fulfillment center with 50,000 square feet or less in gross floor area. b. Parcel Sorting Facilities. An establishment for sorting and/or re-distribution of parcels or products from distribution/fulfillment centers to a parcel hub via intramodal transit truck-to-truck. C. Parcel Hub. A"last mile" facility or similar establishment for the processing and/or re-distribution of parcels or products. A parcel hub's primary function is 53 Page 858 moving a shipment from one mode of transport to another for delivery directly to consumers or end-users. 1) Parcel Hub, Large. A parcel hub facility with a minimum gross floor area over 130,000 square feet. 2) Parcel Hub, Small. A parcel hub facility with less than 130,000 square feet in gross floor area. 4. Food processing/manufacturing. Activities include methods of turning fresh foods into food products through various processes including, for example, washing, chopping, pasteurizing, freezing, fermenting, packaging, and cooking. 5. Lumber Yard. Activities include the storage, sale, and display of lumber, wood, and building construction products. Lumber and wood products may be stored outside or within a structure. On-site milling and planing of wood is prohibited. 6. Maker Space. Activities typically include, but are not limited to on-site, small-scale production of tangible goods including assembly of completely hand-fabricated parts or hand-fabrication of custom or craft goods not for mass production. Examples of maker space uses include ceramic studios, fabrics, inlays, needlework, weaving, leatherwork woodwork, 3D printing, laser cutting, local food and beverage production, metal or glass work, candle making, or custom jewelry. Goods are predominantly manufactured and fabricated involving only the use of hand tools or domestic-scaled mechanical equipment and kilns not exceeding 20 square feet in size. Retail sales are permitted on site. Accessory retail areas cannot exceed 30 percent of the maker space floor area. 7. Manufacturing, custom. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of custom- made products. These types of business establishments do not utilize raw materials for their finished products, but rather may utilize semi-finished type of manufactured materials for their custom made-to-order products. The finished products from these business establishments are ready for use or consumption and may include on-site wholesale and retail of the goods produced. Examples of custom manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to household furniture, apparel products, electrical instruments signs and advertising displays, and assembly of bicycle parts. The uses do not produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a minor use permit. 8. Manufacturing, Green Technology. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment, or fabrication of finished made-to-order products utilizing semi-finished manufactured materials rather than raw materials. Examples of green technology manufacturing uses include, but are not limited to solar panels, wind turbines, geothermal system components, and batteries for electric vehicles/bicycles. The uses do not typically produce odors, noise, vibration, or particulates that would adversely affect uses in the same structure or on a same site. Where 24-hour on-site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted with a minor use permit. 9. Manufacturing, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, labor- intensive manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, or repair processes which do not involve large container truck traffic or the transport of large-scale bulky products but may include limited rail traffic. The new product may be finished in that it is ready for use or consumption or it may be semi-finished to become a component for further assembly and packaging. These types of business establishments are customarily directed to the 54 Page 859 wholesale market, inter-plant transfer, rather than direct sale to the consumer. Such uses may include, but are not limited to, electronic microchip assembly; printing, publishing, and allied industries; food processing and manufacturing; candy and other confectionery products; bottled or canned soft drinks and carbonated water; apparel and other finished products; paperboard containers and boxes; drugs; medical equipment; and small fabricated metal products such as hand tools, general hardware, architectural, and ornamental metal work and toys, amusement, sports, and athletics goods. The activities do not produce odors, noise, vibration, hazardous waste materials, or particulates that would adversely affect other uses in the structure or on the same site. Where 24-hour on- site surveillance is necessary, a caretaker's residence may be permitted when approved by a minor use permit. a. Manufacturing, Light—Large. A light manufacturing facility with a minimum gross floor area over 50,000 square feet b. Manufacturing, Light — Small. A light manufacturing facility with 50,000 square feet or less in gross floor area. 11. Microbrewery. A small-scale brewery operation dedicated to the production of specialty beers and producing less than 15,000 barrels (465,000 U.S. gallons) per year. Ancillary on-site tasting and/or retail sales of beers produced on-site for off-site consumption may be permitted when approved by a conditional use permit. 12. Printing and publishing. Establishments engaged in printing by letterpress, lithography, gravure, screen, offset, or electrostatic (xerographic) copying, and other establishments serving the printing trade including bookbinding, typesetting, engraving, photoengraving, and electrotyping. This use also includes establishments that publish newspapers, books, and periodicals, and establishments manufacturing business forms and binding devices. Does not include "quick printing" services or desktop publishing which are included in "business support services." 13. Recycling facility, collection. A recycling facility used for the acceptance by donation, redemption, or purchase of recyclable materials from the public that does not occupy more than 500 square feet. This classification may include a mobile unit, kiosk- type units that may include permanent structures, and unattended containers placed for the donation of recyclable materials. Also includes so-called "reverse vending machines," an automated mechanical device that accepts one or more types of empty beverage containers including, but not limited to, aluminum cans, glass bottles, and plastic bottles, and issues a cash refund or a redeemable credit slip with value of not less than the container's redemption value as determined by the state. 14. Recycling facility, processing. A recycling facility located in a building or enclosed space and used for the collection and processing of recyclable materials. Processing means the preparation of material for efficient shipment or to an end-user's specifications by such means as baling, briquetting, compacting, flattening, grinding, crushing, mechanical sorting, shredding, cleaning, and remanufacturing. Collection of recycling materials as the sole activity is included in the definition of Recycling facility, collection. 16. Research and development. Indoor facilities for scientific research, and the design, development, and testing of electrical, electronic, magnetic, optical, and mechanical components in advance of product manufacturing, that is not associated with a manufacturing facility on the same site. Includes, but is not limited to, chemical, medical, and biotechnology research and development. Does not include computer software companies (see Office, business and professional), soils and other materials testing laboratories (see Business support services). 55 Page 860 17. Storage, personal storage facility. A structure or group of structures containing generally small, individual, compartmentalized stalls or lockers rented as individual storage spaces and characterized by low parking demand. 18. Storage warehouse. Facility for the storage of furniture, household goods, or other commercial goods of any nature. Includes cold storage. Does not include warehouse, storage, or mini-storage facilities offered for rent or lease to the general public (see Storage, personal storage facility) or warehouse facilities in which the primary purpose of storage is for wholesaling and distribution (see Wholesale, storage and distribution (medium and light)). 21. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, light. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesaling, storage, and warehousing services and storage and wholesale to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy 50,000 square feet or less of building space. Retail sales from the premises may occur when approved by a conditional use permit. 22. Wholesale, storage, and distribution, medium. Activities typically include, but are not limited to, wholesale, storage, and warehousing services; moving and storage services; storage and wholesaling to retailers from the premises of finished goods and food products; and distribution facilities for large-scale retail firms. Activities under this classification shall be conducted in enclosed buildings and occupy greater than 50,000 square feet of building space. Included are multi-tenant or speculative buildings with over 50,000 square feet of warehouse space. 23. Work/Live. A building or spaces within a building used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work. Typical types of work include small-scale, custom manufacturing of goods with limited on-site sales. The dedicated work area must be at least twice the size of the residential area with no more than two inhabitants living on the premises. Work/Live uses are typically found in industrial zones and have a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. 56 Page 861 EXHIBIT H Amendments to Chapter 17.36 (Development Standards by Base Zoning District) Amended Section: 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. 17.36.040 Development standards for industrial districts. A. Purpose and applicability. The purpose of this section is to establish minimum development standards that are unique to development projects within the Industrial Zoning Districts. Development standards in this section apply to all land designated on the zoning map within an Industrial Zoning District. B. Industrial districts. As identified in chapter 17.26 (Establishment of Zoning Districts), the city includes three Industrial Zoning Districts: Industrial Park (IP), Neo-Industrial (NI), and Industrial Employment (IE). C. Industrial site development standards. General site development standards for Industrial Zoning Districts are listed in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). These development standards supplement the development standards in article IV(Site Development Provisions) that apply to all zoning districts (e.g., parking, signs, landscaping, and lighting). TABLE 17.36.040-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Development Standard/Zoning IP NI IE District Lot area (minimum)�'� 0.5 ac 0.5 ac 5 ac o) 2 ac Lot width (minimum) (3) 100 ft 100 ft 100 ft Min. Setback (ft.) (4) Front yard (and Street Side Yard) See Table 17.36.040-2 Major Arterial and Special 45 ft 45 ft 45 ft Boulevard Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 35 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft Interior Side yard 5 ft (5) 5 ft(5) 5 ft(5) Rear yard O ft (5) 0 ft (5) O ft (5) Distance Between Buildings Primary buildings Must meet current building code requirements Accessory buildings Must meet current building code requirements Max. Building Height(ft.) Primary buildings(7) 35 feet at the front setback line 45 ft 45 ft 65 ft Accessory buildings - Detached 25 ft 25 ft 25 ft Accessory buildings — Attached -- 35 ft 35 ft Maker Space Floor Area Ratio (Ratio of building floor area to lot square footage) Floor area ratio 0.4-0.6 (8) 0.4-0.6 (9) 0.4-0.6 (9) 57 Page 862 Max. Building Footprint(sq. ft.) Primary Building (11) -- 200,000 450,000 Accessory Building - Detached -- 5,000 10,000 Accessory Building —Attached Maker 30,000 30,000 Space Min. Open Space (minimum percentage of open space per parcel or project) Open space/landscape area 15% 10% 100 (2)/5% Performance standards (see chapter A A C/B (2) 17.66) Table notes: Condominium lots. Condominium lots and lots within an approved master planned development are exempt from required minimum parcel size and dimension requirements. (2) The following applies within 1,000 feet of Arrow Route:minimum 2-acre lot area; 10%minimum landscape area;and the"B"level performance standards(chapter 17.66). (3) Setbacks shall be the minimum required under the city's currently adopted building code. (4) Setback shall be increased to 45 feet when abutting a residential property line or adjacent to Interstate 15. (6) See Table 17.36.040-2 for parcels abutting special boulevards as indicated in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). (6) Buildings used for industrial uses that exceed 35 feet in height shall be set back an additional one foot from the front setback line for each one foot of building height up to a maximum setback of 70 feet.The portion of the building used for offices are not subject to this requirement. (7) Heights over 75 feet may be permitted with a conditional use permit. (6) For hotels and motels,the maximum floor area ratio is 1.0(100 percent). (9) Parking structures in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts are exempt from floor area ratio requirements. (10) Conditional use permit approval by the city council is required for all industrial buildings larger than 75,000 square feet in gross floor area.See Section 17.20.060(Conditional use permit).A master plan is required for all industrial buildings larger than 450,000 square feet in gross floor area. D. Other miscellaneous industrial development standards. 1. Special streetscape. Future development and redevelopment within industrial areas shall be consistent with the special streetscape standards listed in Table 17.36.040- 2 (Streetscape Setback Requirements) and as depicted in Figure 17.36.040-1 (Special Streetscape Requirements). TABLE 17.36.040-2 STREETSCAPE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Average Depth of Building Setback(2,3, Street Type Landscape(',2) 4,6) Parking Setback Major Arterial, Special 45 ft 45 ft 25 ft Boulevard, and Interstate 15 Secondary 35 ft 35 ft 20 ft Local/Collector 25 ft 25 ft 15 ft Table notes: The average depth shall be uninterrupted from the face of curb, except for sidewalks, pedestrian hardscape, plazas and courtyards,and monument signs. (2) Parcels less than 225 feet in depth from the ultimate curb face on special boulevards are not required to provide an average depth of landscaping or building setback greater than 25 feet or 20%the depth of the property,whichever is greater. (3) As determined from the face of curb. (4) Average depth of landscaping must still be provided. 58 Page 863 e Street frontage walls and fences over 3 feet in height are subject to building setbacks. s Setbacks may be increased based on building height.See Table 17.36.040-1. 2. Accessory maker spaces. Accessory maker spaces are required in or adjacent to all new buildings that exceed 200,000 square feet in gross floor area in the Neo-Industrial (NI)_and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts, subject to the following standards: a. A minimum gross floor area of 3,000 sq.ft. and a maximum gross floor area of 30,000 square feet. b. Accessory maker spaces shall face main arterial roads adjacent to the site. C. Maker space building frontages shall include either an at-grade loading area or an above-grade loading area on a terraced entry. FIGURE 17.36.040-1 SPECIAL STREETSCAPE REQUIREMENTS 59 Page 864 Streetscape Setback Requirements for Major Arterials and Special Boulevards 'mMinimum ^mxmmgeoepth smmmimum Building Setback of Landscaping F Parking Setback Li Stneetscape Setback Requirements for Secondary Streets 35'mm/mvm osxveraowowpm anMmimum Building Setback FafLandscaping FParking Setback C=0 Sxreex»cape Setback Requirements for Local Streets s'wm/mum 25'mmmnooep,h 'mm/mum Building Setback F of Landscaping 'a rking Setback 3. Special building height standards. Building height limits shall not exceed the height limits prescribed in the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan. For areas within the High Terrain Zone, the building height limit shall be 70 feat. Buildings or structures greater than 70 feet in height within the High Terrain Zone are subject to the C>NT-|AC Project Notification Process and require a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)exception (Obstruction Evaluation - Form 7400). In cases where the LA/Ontario International Airport Compatibility Plan permits heights greater than 70 faet, building height limits shall be limited to maximum of height of 75 feet, unless o conditional use permit in granted permitting heights greater than 75feet. 60 PageOG5 4. Special height exceptions for ancillary equipment. Within the Industrial Employment(IE)Zoning District, height exceptions may be granted for ancillary equipment with special design and landscape considerations as follows: a. Maximum 90 feet with approval of a minor exception with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. b. Maximum 120 feet with approval of a conditional use permit with the additional findings that the ancillary equipment is designed in a manner that integrates well within the subject site and existing and/or proposed landscaping will buffer the views of ancillary equipment from designated view corridors. 5. Interim uses. Certain industrial properties may be vacant without any immediate plans for site development. In these instances, the properties may be utilized for a defined list of interim uses for a limited time period as specified below. The uses permitted within this section are supplemental to the uses listed in chapter 17.30 (Allowed Land Uses by Base Zoning District). a. Permitted interim uses include agricultural crops, roadside stands, farmers market, community garden, and private parks and picnic areas. b. Minor use permit required. Prior to the establishment of an interim use, a minor use permit shall be approved. C. Time period. The maximum time period for an interim use is five years. d. Conditions. At a minimum, the conditions should include an agreement between the city and the applicant stipulating timing, installation of permanent improvements and buildings, and/or restoration of the site to its original condition. At the end of five years, the use shall be removed or the site developed in accordance with the full development regulations of any adopted plan. 6. Interim use standards. The following standards shall apply in all industrial areas for interim uses: a. The minimum streetscape and parking setback requirement shall be contiguous with the ultimate right-of-way line, but in no case less than ten feet. b. No minimum landscape coverage requirements are required, except where necessary for screening purposes as determined by the planning director. C. All parking and storage areas shall be paved with slag, crushed aggregate, asphaltic concrete, concrete, or similar materials. The location, number, and design of the parking and storage areas shall be in accordance with Code requirements. d. All parking and storage areas, and other interim uses which require screening as determined by the planning director, shall be screened from public view through a combination of landscaping and fencing. Fencing may include a six-foot chain-link fence with slats, masonry or concrete, wood, or decorative metal. Screening must be maintained in good condition at all times. e. Landscaping required for screening purposes shall include 15-gallon trees and five-gallon shrubs to provide a dense landscape buffer to afford maximum screening from the public view, satisfactory to the planning director. 7. Rail service. If rail service is needed for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead or spur lines, the following rail service access standards, unless modified 61 Page 866 by the rail service provider or the public utilities commission, shall apply: Rail crossings and any spur construction must be approved by the rail service provider and the public utilities commission. The following rail service standards, unless modified by the railroad or the public utilities commission, shall apply: a. Minimum easement width for a lead line, single track shall be 32 feet. b. Minimum easement width for a double rail track shall be 41 feet. C. The minimum radius of curvature for a track shall be 180 feet. d. The maximum gradient along spur tracks shall not exceed two percent. e. Dock height shall be no less than 4.5 feet above the top of the spur track. f. Road crossings at grade must be avoided wherever possible. g. Spur trackage is not permitted along any frontage between a building and a public right-of-way and must be confined to the side or rear yard area of the building that the rail spur serves. h. Rail loading areas shall be screened from view from the public right-of-way by a wall that matches the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building that the rail spur serves. i. Spur tracks shall not encroach onto/across any required parking stalls. Spur tracks shall not encroach across drive aisles for automobile / heavy truck and/or emergency vehicle access except when it is necessary to connect the main rail line with the rail loading area. j. Lot divisions and building layouts for properties which adjoin existing or proposed lead and spur lines shall be done in a manner to ensure full potential of future rail access and use and should not preclude rail access to other properties adjacent to such rail lines. Subdivisions, which could reduce a property's ability to accommodate potential rail served developments, may not be authorized. k. Building design shall include rail service features to ensure the potential use of available spur lines. I. Finished floor elevations and dock height door or"kick out"wall panels shall be provided in all properties abutting rail lines. M. The above-referenced rail service development standards may be amended or deleted on a site-by-site basis during the development review process. The following must be determined by the planning commission in order to authorize any modification of the rail service standard: i. That the installation of a lead or spur track cannot be accomplished due to physical constraints on or adjacent to the project site; and ii. Other existing or potential rail service properties will not be negatively affected in their ability to accommodate rail service activity as a result of modifications to the standards. 8. Equipment screening. The following screening standards shall apply to equipment such as HVAC units, storage tanks, ducting, etc.: a. All roof, wall, and ground mounted equipment shall be screened and not visible from the public right-of-way within the Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District. b. Wherever possible, all roof, wall and ground mounted equipment shall be screened and not visible from the public right-of-way within the Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District. 62 Page 867 C. The visibility of any equipment from the public right-of-way shall be determined by "line-of-sight" and measured from a point that is 6 feet above the finished surface of the centerline of the public right-of-way, e.g. street. d. All screening of roof mounted equipment shall be accomplished with a parapet wall that is consistent and compatible with the architecture, materials, colors, etc. of the building. Where a parapet wall is not possible, then a screen shall be provided to enclose the roof mounted equipment. This enclosure is exempt from the building height requirement established in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). Where roof mounted mechanical equipment and/or ductwork projects less than 18 inches above the roof or roof parapet it shall be painted consistent with the color scheme of the building. 9. Design standards. The following design standards apply to all new developments in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts: a. Site design standards i. General site design • Site elements such as buildings, parking areas, driveways, sidewalks, and outdoor recreational spaces must be arranged to emphasize the aesthetically pleasing components of the site (e.g., landscaping and the superior architectural design of office building element (refer to b. (Building design standards)) and to screen less attractive elements (e.g., service facilities, loading docks, outdoor storage, equipment areas, and refuse enclosures) through the proper placement and design of buildings, screen walls, and landscaping. • Sites shall have internal sidewalks that connect to sidewalks along public streets to create pedestrian connections. • Loading dock areas shall be located and designed so that they do not face toward (and are not visible from) any adjacent public right- of-way such as a street. These areas shall be screened with walls or fences and landscaped (Insert cross reference to applicable landscaping/screening sections). • All refuse, storage, and equipment areas placed outside of a building shall be screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and uses. ii. Block Network Parameters for Public Streets. • Intersection spacing along arterial edges shall be between 1/8 mile and '/4 mile with at least one mid-block intersection between intersecting arterials and rail, flood control, utility or freeway corridors. • Intersection spacing inside arterial/arterial blocks bounded by arterials shall be a minimum of 200 feet and a maximum of 1,320 feet. • Buildings greater than 450,000 sq. ft. in size shall have public streets on at least 3 sides. • A minimum of 1 public street shall run parallel with and within 500 feet of rail (excluding spurs), flood control, utility, or freeway 63 Page 868 corridors. The parallel street shall run through the block. Street crossings at intersecting corridors shall be established on a case- by-case basis based on feasibility and needs by the City Engineer. • Intersections along arterials shall be aligned with existing/proposed intersections on the opposite side of the arterial where possible and meet minimum design standards for offsets or clearance from adjacent corridors as required by the City Engineer. • Two distinct points of connection shall be provided through an internal block network to the arterial street network for every industrial parcel. Parking location and design • Surface parking shall be located to the side or to the rear of principle buildings to the greatest extent feasible. • Surface parking stalls for employees and guests may incorporate shade structures that are capable of supporting solar/photovoltaic array systems with a minimum clearance height of 12 feet. • The shade structures shall not encroach into the required access lanes. • The applicable tree and landscaping standards are not required in the sections of the parking areas where solar arrays systems are placed. See Section 17.56.060.N.1.b (Exception for solar collectors). • All new development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts requires a Parking management plan, see Section 17.64.070 (Parking management plan). iv. Open space • An outdoor seating/break area is required for every proposed and potential office area of a building • On-site open space areas shall contain an outdoor seating/break area with seating designed to allow a variety of sitting environments. • Outdoor seating areas shall provide shade under a suitable structure and wind protection using landscaping or transparent screening structures. • Outdoor seating areas shall be easily accessed from the lobby or interior break rooms and placed at the corner of the building or along the side of a building facing a public street. • Outdoor seating areas are included within the minimum open space requirement in Table 17.36.040-1 (Development Standards for Industrial Zoning Districts). V. Landscaping, screening, and street trees • All new industrial developments shall adhere to the standards in Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping standards) in addition to the standards provided below. In the event of a conflict, the provisions of this section shall apply. 64 Page 869 • Landscaping shall be provided along the public streets and sidewalks to define the street edge, buffer pedestrians from vehicles, and provide shade. • All new trees planted within the public right-of-way or to screen the front, side or rear of a building, and to screen the building from Interstate 15 shall be a minimum 24-inch box and planted 25 — 30 feet apart. • Trees shall be selected and planted to provide shade for walkways, outdoor seating areas, parking areas etc. and for their ability for filtering particulate matter and other pollutants from the air. • Walls and fences used to provide screening of loading facilities, outdoor trash receptacles, utility equipment, etc. must be solid and designed with materials and finishes that are consistent with and complimentary to the design of the primary buildings. Fences used for security purposes or around parking areas shall consist of wrought iron, tubular steel, or similar material. The use of chain-link is prohibited. Landscape materials as required in accordance with Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping Standards) may compliment the requirements for screening, but landscaping without a screen wall or fence does not meet the minimum screening requirement of this section. • When redevelopment occurs, new public streets as required by the city engineer shall be designed in compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, public sidewalks along the frontage of the property being developed are required. • All new sidewalks shall be a minimum of 6 feet or wider as designated by the city engineer based on existing or planned adjacent land uses to ensure compliance with the city's Complete Streets policies, separated from the curb by a planted parkway, and installed parallel to the property line or curb. Meandering sidewalks along any frontage are prohibited. b. Building design standards i. Building orientation and placement. • Buildings shall have articulated and transparent frontages along a minimum of 50 feet on both sides of the building that define the corner. • Office and administration buildings associated with an industrial use shall be placed at the corner of a building at the intersection of two public streets and/or a main arterial road. The building corner shall have a prominent, vertical structural element (e.g. a tower) that projects no more than 15 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building and that occupies a maximum of 5 percent of the building roof area. In addition, raised parapets with enhanced decorative treatment such as cornices or crenellations are permitted not to exceed 8 feet above the maximum allowable height of the building. If an office or administration building is located at 65 Page 870 the intersection of two arterial streets the height of the tower or raised parapets may be increased an additional 25 percent. • The primary entrance to accessory maker spaces and an office/administration building must face the corner or an adjacent main arterial road. • Where feasible, equipment, electrical, and service rooms shall be placed within the footprint of the building, i.e. inside the building, or screened so that it is not visible from the public right-of-way. ii. Building facade articulation. • Primary building entries shall be readily identifiable and well- defined using projections, recesses, columns, roof structures, or other design elements. • All elevations of a building's facade shall include modulation and articulation of the wall plane and roof line, proportionate to the height and length of the building. Exceptions to this requirement are the wall planes at the dock areas and the rear elevation of the building. • All elevations of a building's facade must have vertical or horizontal variations in color, texture, material, and ornamentation. • The office component of building facades must contain offset or recessed structural bays, and projecting elements such as colonnades or bay windows. • Shade elements such as canopies, awnings, arcades, and overhangs shall be provided over all windows, and at all pedestrian entry points, along the front elevation, any street-facing elevation, and office portions of the building. • Roofs shall be designed as an integral component of building form, mass, and facade, particularly along the front and office portions of the building. Building form shall be enhanced by sloped or offset roof planes, eave heights, and rooflines. Materials and detailing • The front and office portions of buildings must be constructed of high-quality materials, including, but not limited to, brick, stone, textured cast stone, tinted masonry units, concrete, glass, and metal siding. • The following materials are prohibited along the front and office portions of the building: 1. Unadorned, plain or painted concrete block or panels; 2. Reflective glass; and 3. Vinyl, fiberglass, asphalt, or fiberboard siding. • Where feasible, the industrial/warehousing portion of the building must include a variety of materials and architectural elements to break up the linear planes of these building. Ideally, the building's design and architecture must express the nature of the industrial 66 Page 871 activity within, in keeping with the other requirements of this section and while respecting the functionality of the use within the building. iv. Door and window openings • For office portions of principle buildings, window and door openings must comprise at least 60 percent of the total area of exterior walls facing a public street. • These windows must be clear or translucent to improve visibility, add visual interest, and allow light into interior spaces. V. Lighting • Decorative lighting fixtures shall be provided with a minimum 1-foot candle illumination level above that of surrounding parking lots at vehicle driveways and driveway entry/exits, pedestrian pathways, plazas and courtyards, and other activity areas. • Building and landscape accent up-lighting shall be incorporated into the lighting plan for the development site, with a focus along the front and office portions of the building. • All exterior lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare and light trespass onto adjacent properties and streets. • Lighting systems shall be architecturally compatible with surrounding buildings to express the unique character of the area. 67 Page 872 EXHIBIT I Amendments to Chapter 17.38 (Overlay Zoning Districts and Other Special Planning Areas) New Section: 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District. 17.38.080 Large Warehouse Overlay Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone is to ensure that large industrial buildings of 450,000 square feet or more are located in areas of the City with adequate public services and infrastructure and away from sensitive receptors who may be impacted by air pollutant emissions, noise, and other impacts generated by the predominant uses in such buildings. B. Applicability. Industrial buildings with gross floor space of 450,000 square feet or more that are developed after the effective date of the ordinance that codified this section shall be located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone. The Large Warehouse Overlay Zone applies to property designated on the zoning map by reference letters "LW" after the reference letter(s) identifying the base zoning district. C. Allowed uses. Permitted uses within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone are those permitted and conditionally permitted uses within the underlying zoning district. D. Development standards. Development in the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone shall comply with the zoning regulations applicable to the underlying zoning district and any master plan applicable to the subject property. A master plan adopted pursuant to chapter 17.22.020 may also be required for the development of an industrial building located within the Large Warehouse Overlay Zone, unless amended by the city council as part of the establishment of the overlay district. 68 Page 873 EXHIBIT J Amendments to Chapter 17.48 (Fences, Walls, and Screening) Amended Sections: 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. 17.48.040 Materials and maintenance. A. Fencing, wall, and screen materials. Fences, walls, and screens shall be constructed of attractive, long-lasting materials and architecturally integrated with the building design and with existing fences/walls on the site. The following limitations apply: 1. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in residential districts shall be solid wood with steel frames, solid vinyl, tubular steel or wrought iron. Where tubular steel wrought iron is used, it shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate. In new developments, decorative block walls shall be used. 2. Fences and gates approved for screening purposes in industrial or commercial districts shall be metal, tubular steel, or wrought iron (open fencing shall be backed by solid or perforated metal sheeting painted to match the fence or gate). In the Industrial Zoning Districts the requirements for fences, walls, and screening provided in Section 17.36.040.D.9.a.v (Landscaping, screening, and street trees) shall also apply. 3. Chain-link fences and/or gates are not permitted for screening purposes in any zoning district (including the Industrial Zoning Districts), including chain-link when backed with wood or plastic slats, solid plastic sheet, or knitted fabric privacy/wind screening . 4. Alternative materials may be approved by the planning director or planning commission as part of a discretionary entitlement approval. B. Graffiti-resistance. Graffiti-resistant aesthetic surface treatment shall be required for all fences and walls adjacent to a public right-of-way, in a residential zone, or as determined though the site development review process. C. Maintenance. Fences, walls, and screens shall be continuously maintained in an orderly and good condition, at no more than their maximum allowed height. (Code 1980, § 17.48.040; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 § 4, 2013) 17.48.050 Requirements by land use type. A. Applicable to all land use types. 1. Fencing and walls for pools, spas, and similar features. Swimming pools, spas, and other similar water features shall be enclosed in compliance with building code requirements. 2. Fences, walls, and screening between different land uses. Commercial and industrial uses shall be screened from adjacent residential zoning districts by plant materials and a solid, decorative masonry wall with a minimum height of six feet to screen the commercial use, as approved by the designated approving authority. Openings or pedestrian connections may be required at the discretion of the designated approving authority. A landscaping strip with a minimum width of five feet shall be installed adjacent to a screening wall facing the public street. 69 Page 874 3. Temporary fences. Nothing in this chapter shall be deemed to prohibit the erection of a temporary fence around construction projects in compliance with the building code and other applicable requirements of this Code. 4. Screening standards for fire district connections and double check devices. All ground-mounted equipment is required to be screened according to the following standards. Option A is preferred. Option C should only be used if the other two options are considered infeasible by the planning director.Additional provisions apply to fire check valves (as noted). a. Option A; block wall screen. i. Required materials are decorative block, finished stucco. or a wall designed to match building architecture. ii. Minimum height is three feet with a maximum height of four feet. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the wall. b. Option 8; metal screen with vines and equipment painted green. i. Provide metal screen fence painted dark green. ii. Plant climbing vines along the base of the screen. iii. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the screen. iv. If concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of three feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. V. Minimum two feet from the face of the screen and the property line. vi. Paint the equipment dark green or equivalent. C. Option C; landscape screen and equipment painted green. i. This option can only be considered if the equipment can be adequately screened by two rows of five-gallon shrubs. Otherwise only Option A or B may be used. ii. Provide two rows of five-gallon shrubs. iii. Spaced 18 inches on center. iv. Minimum three feet clearance between the equipment and the shrubs in required. V. If a concrete pad is provided around the base of the equipment, the pad must be a minimum of two feet from the property line to allow installation of landscaping. vi. No minimum clearance between the property line and the landscaping is required. d. Additional requirements for fire district check valves. i. Maximum five feet overall from the equipment and the property line. ii Signage shall be provided according to fire district standards. iii. The fire district connection must extend beyond the wall or landscaping and must not obstruct the fire district connection. 70 Page 875 B. Fencing and walls for agricultural land uses. All fences or walls which enclose livestock shall be constructed of an adequate height and shall be designed so as to control and contain such livestock at all times. C. Residential zoning districts. 1. Trail fences and gates shall be kept in good repair at all times, including replacing damaged members and maintaining plumb. This shall not preclude the property owner from replacing the existing trail fence with another fence or wall material. 2. Height. The height of fences in residential district is limited according to the following table. TABLE 17.48.050-1 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF FENCES AND WALLS IN REQUIRED YARD AREA Location or Minimum Location of Fence/Wall/Screening Setback of Fence Maximum Height 0) (2) Required front yard area 0 ft (2) 3 ft/6 ft (3) Required rear and interior side yard area (along 0 ft 6 ft rear and interior property lines) Required street side yard area (along corner �2) side property lines) 5 ft 6 ft At intersections of streets, alleys, and driveways Varies(4) 36 in within the clear visibility triangle All other areas of lot 0 ft 6 ft Table notes:** As part of site development review, design review(minor or major),or other discretionary entitlement,the designated approving authority may grant additional height or location requirements to enclose or screen specific areas or uses or for fences and walls designed for noise attenuation. (2) Setback area for street side yard is measured property line to the fence or wall. (3) Height of front yard fence or wall may be increased to a maximum of six feet if the top three feet of fencing is constructed of material that is 90 percent visually open and transparent(e.g., picket fence, open wood slats, open wrought iron)including any architectural features designed as part of the fence(e.g., pilasters and lights). (4) See definition of clear vision triangle in section 17.126(Universal Definitions). 3. Outdoor recreation courts. Fencing for outdoor recreation courts (e.g., tennis courts, basketball courts) shall not exceed 12 feet in height and shall be located five feet from any rear or side property lines, except when adjacent to outdoor recreation courts on adjacent properties. D. Commercial, office, and mixed use zoning districts. 1. Outdoor storage (including all dumpsters, commercial items, commercial construction, or industrial-related materials and equipment within commercial zoning districts) shall be fenced or screened from view. Such screening shall utilize enclosures including, but not limited to, fences, walls, landscaping, or earthen berms, so that no outdoor storage is visible from any public rights-of-way, parks, public trails, and adjacent properties. Screening shall be visually compatible with the primary buildings and landscape on the property. 2. Screening of commercial loading docks and refuse areas. Loading docks and refuse storage areas shall be screened from public view, adjoining public streets and rights-of-way and residentially zoned areas. The method of screening shall be 71 Page 876 architecturally compatible with other on-site development in terms of colors and materials. Trash enclosures shall be consistent with city standard drawings. Exceptions may be permitted through the administrative design review process for sites with unique characteristics (e.g., shallow lot depth, adjacency to single-family residential). E. Industrial zoning districts. 1. Storage area/screening. The purpose of storage area/screening regulations is to allow for on-site storage, which is screened from view from the public right-of-way or from adjacent properties accessible to the public and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding environment. The following standards shall apply according to land use category: a. Standards for storage area/screen wall height in all industrial zoning districts. The height of all storage area/screening walls shall not exceed eight feet, measured from the finished grade immediately adjacent to the wall and the top of the wall. b. Industrial Park (IP) Zoning District. No outdoor storage shall be permitted except for fleet vehicles and light trucks (not exceeding 6,000 pounds). Outdoor storage tanks may be permitted at a height not to exceed eight feet from highest finished grade when screened from public view by walls constructed of concrete, masonry, or other similar materials. C. Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District. All materials, supplies, equipment, loading docks, and trucks and trailers shall be stored within an enclosed building or an area screened from public view. d. Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District. All materials, supplies, equipment, and operating trucks shall be stored within an enclosed building or storage area. Such storage areas within 120 feet of a street frontage shall be screened. e. Within 600 feet of the 1-15 right-of-way, all outdoor storage shall be screened from public view from the freeway. Screening may include the use or combination of block or masonry walls, 36-inch box trees planted a maximum of 30 feet apart, or the building mass. f. Within all industrial land use categories, all storage area screening shall be architecturally integrated with surrounding buildings utilizing concrete, masonry, or other similar materials. For walls comprised of the combination of a screen wall on top of a retaining wall, the overall height of the combined wall may exceed eight feet provided that the part of the wall that faces the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), does not exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a. g. Within the Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, storage area screening may include masonry or concrete walls and, metal, or wood fences. The front and exterior side area shall be screened with non-opaque fencing, when loading areas or storage areas are not present. h. Storage of materials or equipment shall not exceed screen height within 100 feet of street-fronting screens. i. The planning director may waive screening requirements where future building expansion would screen an abutting storage area. 72 Page 877 j. The planning director may waive screening requirements along the front and exterior side of the building if there are no loading docks or storage areas present. 2. Security fences and walls. The purpose of security fencing and wall standards is to provide for a safe environment for businesses within the industrial area. a. Site planning, including building configuration and placement, is encouraged to create defined areas that may be adequately secured. b. Any wall or fence along a street frontage over three feet in height is subject to the streetscape setback requirements. C. Within all industrial land use categories except the Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, all fencing or walls shall be wrought iron, concrete, masonry, or other similar materials, not to exceed the maximum height established in section 17.48.050.E.1.a. The use of barbed wire or similar materials is prohibited from these land use categories. Chain-link fencing is not permitted in the area(s) of a property that is/are located between the public right-of-way (street, sidewalk, etc.), and the building wall plane(s) of the building(s) on the property, that face(s) the public right-of-way. Chain-link fencing may only be used along the side and rear property lines, and within the interior of the property, if the fencing will not be visible from any portion of the public right-of-way that is adjacent to the property. d. Within the Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District, security fencing may include wrought iron, masonry or concrete walls, and wood or metal fences. Barbed wire may be permitted atop fencing. e. Security gates are subject to site plan review according to section 17.16.110 (Site Development Review). 3. Trash enclosures. City standard drawings shall be used for all trash enclosures. 73 Page 878 EXHIBIT K Chapter 17.56 (Landscaping Standards) Amended Sections: 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. 17.56.050 General landscape development standards. A. General location for landscape improvements. Landscaping shall be provided in the following locations for all types of development as listed below, unless the designated approving authority determines that the required landscape is not necessary to fulfill the purposes of this chapter. Nothing in this chapter is intended to discourage landscape areas outside and beyond the minimum requirements listed herein. 1. Setbacks. All setback areas required by this Code shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter except where a required setback is occupied by a sidewalk or driveway or is enclosed and screened from abutting public rights-of-way. In the Neo- Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts only the front and exterior side yard setback areas adjoining public rights-of-way are required to be landscaped, including the property frontage within the right-of-way. All other areas within these Industrial Zoning Districts must be paved or surfaced to minimize dust. 2. Undeveloped areas. All areas of a project site not intended for a specific use or purpose in conjunction with a current application, including pad sites being held for future development, shall be landscaped in compliance with this chapter. 3. Parking areas.Within parking lots, landscaping shall be used for shade and climate control, to enhance project design, and to screen the visual impact of vehicles and large expanses of pavement consistent with the requirements of this chapter. B. Plant type. Landscape planting shall emphasize drought-tolerant and native species (especially along natural, open space areas), shall complement the architectural design of structures on the site, and shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions specific to the site. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, planting shall emphasize wildfire hazard reduction. 1. Planting layout and plant diversity. Plant selection shall vary in type and planting pattern. Informal planting patterns are preferred over uniform and entirely symmetrical planting patterns. Use of deciduous flowering trees and shrubs and colorful plantings is encouraged in conjunction with evergreen species. Groupings of shrubs shall contain multiple plant types, interspersed with varying heights and blooming seasons for year- round interest. 2. Street and parking lot trees. Street and parking lot trees shall be selected from the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. A minimum of 30 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees, respectively, shall be an evergreen species. For parking lots in the Industrial Zoning Districts with primary buildings greater than 200,000 sf in gross floor area, a minimum of 50 percent of the street trees and parking lot trees shall be an evergreen species. 3. Trees planted within ten feet of a street, sidewalk, paved trail, or walkway shall be a deep-rooted species or shall be separated from hardscapes by a root barrier to prevent physical damage to public improvements. 4. In the wildland-urban interface fire area, plant types shall not include those identified as fire prone or those types that are specifically prohibited by the fire district. 74 Page 879 C. Planting size, spacing, and planter widths. In order to achieve an immediate effect of a landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plant material sizes, plant spacing, and minimum planter widths (inside measurements) are as follows: 1. Trees. The minimum planting size for trees for commercial, office, and community/civic uses shall be 15-gallon, with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size. For commercial, office, and community/civic uses tree spacing within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 2. Trees in industrial zoning districts. a. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses shall be 15-gallon with 25 percent of all trees on a project site planted at a minimum 24-inch box size b. The minimum planting size for trees for industrial uses in primary buildings greater than 200,000 square feet in gross floor area shall be minimum 24-inch box size with 25 percent of all trees at 36-inch box size. C. Tree spacing for all industrial uses within perimeter planters along streets and abutting residential property shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. Minimum planter widths for trees shall be between five feet and ten feet, consistent with the city's adopted master list of street trees and parking lot trees. 3. Shrubs. Shrub planting shall be a minimum five-gallon size, with a 15-gallon minimum size required where an immediate landscape screen is conditioned by the designated approving authority (e.g., screening of headlights from drive-through aisles). The minimum planter width for shrubs is four feet. 4. Ground cover. Plants used for mass planting may be grown in flats of up to 64 plants or in individual one-gallon containers. Rooted cuttings from flats shall be planted no farther apart than 12 inches on center, and containerized woody, shrub ground cover plantings shall be planted no farther apart than three feet on center in order to achieve full coverage within one year. Minimum planter width for ground cover is two feet, with the exception of sod, which requires a minimum planter width of six feet. D. Synthetic turf. Synthetic turf may be used as a substitute for natural turf for the purposes of water conservation. The following standards shall apply to the use and maintenance of synthetic turf. 1. Synthetic turf shall consist of lifelike individual blades of grass that emulate real grass in look and color and have a minimum pile height of one and one-half inches. 2. A proper drainage system shall be installed underneath to prevent excess runoff or pooling of water. 3. Synthetic turf shall be installed and maintained to effectively simulate the appearance of a well maintained lawn. 4. The use of indoor or outdoor plastic or nylon carpeting as a replacement for synthetic turf or natural turf shall be prohibited. 5. Synthetic turf shall be installed in combination with natural plant materials (e.g. trees, shrubs and groundcover) to enhance the overall landscaping design. 75 Page 880 E. Water efficiency. If applicable, projects are required to comply with provisions within chapter 17.82 (water efficient landscaping) of this article. (Code 1980, § 17.56.050; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 § 4, 2013; Ord. No. 879 § 4, 2015) 17.56.060 Special landscape requirements. In addition to the general requirements of section 17.56.050 (general landscape development standards), the requirements listed below apply to the special types of landscaping. However, in the wildland-urban interface fire area, the fire district requirements preclude the application of these special types of landscaping. A. Residential landscape. See section 17.56.070 (additional requirements for residential areas). B. Project entry landscaping. Entries to multi-tenant projects (both residential and nonresidential) shall be designed as a special statement reflective of the character and scale of the project to establish identity for tenants, visitors, and patrons. Flowering access plantings and specimen trees shall be used to reinforce the entry statement. C. Trees adjacent to building walls. With the exception of single-family housing developments, trees shall be planted in areas of public view adjacent to structures at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of building length, particularly to interrupt expansive horizontal and vertical surfaces. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. D. Screening of drive-through aisles. To screen vehicles and associated headlights in a drive- through lane from view of abutting street rights-of-way, a minimum five-foot wide planter shall include a minimum three-foot tall (maximum four-foot tall) landscape barrier planted with trees and other landscaping consistent with those in the parking area. At no time shall this landscape barrier be pruned in a manner that allows the vehicle headlights from the drive-through lane to be visible from abutting street rights-of-way. Plantings shall also be designed to discourage potential safety issues (e.g., persons lying in wait). E. Screening of outdoor equipment. Screening is required according to chapter 17.48 (fences, walls, and screening). F. Wireless communication facilities. Where feasible, facilities shall be installed so as to maintain and enhance existing landscaping on the site, including trees, foliage, and shrubs, whether or not utilized for screening. Additional landscaping may be planted around the tower and related equipment to buffer abutting residential zoning districts or uses and to buffer public trails. Specifically, landscaping around the perimeter of the facility (leased area) shall include dense tree and shrub plantings with the necessary irrigation. Trees shall be fast-growing evergreen species, with a minimum size of 24-inch box. Shrubs shall be a minimum 15-gallon size covering a minimum planter area depth of five feet around the facility. Trees and shrubs shall be planted no farther apart on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species. G. On-site pedestrian pathways. Pedestrian pathway landscaping shall include shade trees placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total pathway area with tree canopies within 15 years of securing building permit. H. Creeks. To the extent that landscaping or planting is required or provided along creeks, such landscaping shall be native plants. I. Public spaces. Pedestrian space landscaping shall include a combination of shade trees and pedestrian shading devices (e.g. canopies, awnings, and umbrellas) placed so as to cover 60 percent of the total space with a shade canopy within 15 years of securing the building permit. 76 Page 881 J. Signs. Landscaping shall be provided at the base of the supporting structure of freestanding signs equal to twice the area of one face of the sign. For example, 50 square feet of sign area requires 100 square feet of landscaped area. K. Buffering between uses. A landscape buffer shall be provided between residential and nonresidential uses and between single-family uses and multi-family uses containing three or more units. Buffer areas shall include a minimum ten-foot wide planter strip with shrubs and both deciduous and evergreen trees planted a maximum of 30 feet on center. L. Interior property boundaries. When a landscaped area is provided, trees shall be planted at a rate of one tree per 30 linear feet of interior property line within a planter area that is a minimum of six feet wide. Tree clusters may be used subject to approval by the approving authority. M. Sound walls/masonry walls. Where setback and open space areas are screened from public view by walls or similar approved structures, landscaping shall be provided such that 50 percent of the wall shall be covered by landscape material within five years. N. Parking lot landscape. Parking lot landscape includes perimeter planters, abutting parking lots and drive aisles, tree planting for parking lot shade, and a combination of continuous planting strips, planting fingers, and parking islands throughout the parking lot. Parking lot landscape requirements applicable to commercial, industrial, mixed-use, and multi-family residential parking lots with five or more spaces are listed below: 1. Number of trees required. Trees shall be required at a rate of one tree for every three parking stalls. At maturity, trees should reach a minimum height and spread of 40 feet so as to form a shade canopy over parking stalls. Smaller ornamental trees may not be used to satisfy this requirement. The minimum width for planters containing a parking lot tree is six feet. Tree selections shall be approved by the planning director. a. Exception for solar collectors. The minimum requirement for trees and shrubs may be waived for the portion of a parking area over which photo-voltaic solar collectors are installed where they also function as shade structures. 2. A minimum of ten percent of the total off-street parking area shall be landscaped with trees, shrubs, and appropriate ground cover. The parking area shall be computed by adding the areas used for access drive aisles, stalls, maneuvering, and landscaping within that portion of the premises that is devoted to vehicular parking and circulation. 3. Each unenclosed parking facility shall provide a perimeter landscaped strip at least five feet wide (inside dimension)where the facility adjoins a side or rear property line. The perimeter landscaped strip may include any landscaped yard or landscaped area otherwise required and shall be continuous, except for required access to the site or parking facility. 4. Screening. All surface parking areas shall be screened from streets and adjoining properties, and the open space areas between the property line and public street right-of- way shall be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Screening between residential and nonresidential uses shall not be less than five feet in height. Parking lot landscaping shall be located so that pedestrians are not required to cross unpaved areas to reach building entrances from parked cars (see Figure 17.56.060-1 [Parking Lot Landscaping]). 5. Existing trees. Existing mature trees on the site in good health shall be preserved whenever possible. 6. Planter design. All parking lot planters shall be designed to meet the following minimum requirements (see Figure 17.56.060-2 [Parking Lot Planter Design]): 77 Page 882 a. Planters shall be separated from maneuvering and parking areas by a six- inch, raised concrete curb or equivalent. b. Tree planting wells located at the front of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 25 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than five feet. O. Landscape planters along the sides of parking stalls shall contain a minimum of 90 square feet and the smallest outside dimension shall not be less than six feet. FIGURE 17.56.060-1 PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING Landscape Screen Low Profile Wall 17 FIGURE 17.56.060-2 PARKING LOT PLANTER DESIGN 78 Page 883 90 SO FT.Minimum Planter 6' Along Side of Stall 5' 15' OR 5' 25 SO FT.Minimum Planter Along Per Stall Front (Code 1980, § 17.56.060; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 879 § 4, 2015) 79 Page 884 EXHIBIT L Amendments to Chapter 17.64 (Parking and Loading Standards) Amended Sections: 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. 17.64.070 Parking management plan 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. 17.64.110 Bicycle parking requirements. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. New Section: 17.64.130 Maintenance. 17.64.050 Number of parking spaces required. A. The following number of parking spaces shall be required to serve the uses or buildings listed, as established in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). Multiple property owners may apply for a conditional use permit for shared parking pursuant to section 17.64.060 (Reductions in Parking Requirements). Otherwise, all uses must provide the sum of the requirements for each individual use. Where the requirements result in a fractional space, the next larger whole number shall be the number of spaces required. In addition, the requirements listed below shall apply. 1. "Square feet" means "gross square feet" and refers to the sum gross square feet of the floor area of a building and its accessory buildings unless otherwise specified. 2. For the purpose of calculating residential parking requirements, dens, studies, or other similar rooms that may be used as bedrooms shall be considered bedrooms. 3. Where the number of seats is listed to determine required parking, seats shall be construed to be fixed seats. Where fixed seats provided are either benches or bleachers, one seat shall be construed to equal 18 linear inches for pews and 24 inches for dining, but in no case shall seating be less than determined as required by the building code. 4. When the calculation of the required number of off-street parking spaces results in a fraction of a space, the total number of spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. 5. Where private streets are proposed for residential development, resident and guest parking shall be provided as determined by the approving authority in conjunction with the required planning entitlement(s). 6. For projects on commercial, office and industrial zoned properties, square footage dedicated to office hallways 44 inches or less, electrical and mechanical rooms, elevator shafts, stairwells, bathrooms and storage closets may be deducted from the gross square footage for parking stall calculation purposes. 7. For all warehouse/storage/e-commerce uses in the industrial zoning districts, the established minimum parking requirements are intended targets. Reductions in the amount of required parking appropriate for a specific use(s) may be approved by the approving authority based on the approval of a parking management plan as well as 80 Page 885 through the conditional use permit and master plan processes, as applicable. See footnote 1 in Table 17.14.060-1 (Approving Authority for Land Use Entitlements). TABLE 17.64.050-1 PARKING REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE Use Spaces Notes Residential Single-family detached dwellings 2 per unit 2 in garage Multi-family development (condominium, townhome, etc.), semi-detached single-family (zero lot line, patio homes, duplexes, etc.), and mobile home parks(') - Studio 1.3 per unit 1 in garage or carport - One bedroom 1.5 per unit 1 in garage or carport - Two bedrooms 2 per unit 1 in garage or carport - Three bedrooms 2 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Four or more bedrooms 2.5 per unit 2 in garage or carport - Visitor (additional required) 1 per 3 units Commercial, Service, and Office Uses Shopping centers - Less than 25,000 square feet Varies See individual uses - 25,000 to 599,000 square feet 5 per 1,000 sf Centers built prior to 1988 4.5/1,000 5.5 per 1,000 sf or a Centers built prior to - 599,000 to 1,000,000 square feet parking study may be 1988 require 4.5/1,000 provided Additional applied to - Food service (if over 15% of GLA) (2) +1 per 100 sf floor area of food service use - Cinemas in centers less than 100,000 square +3 per 100 seats feet (occupying less than 10% of GLA) (2) p - Cinemas in centers of 100,000 to 200,000 square feet, additional parking only required +3 per 100 after the first 750 seats - Offices (if over 10% of GLA) (2) - Parking study required - Shopping center over 1,000,000 square feet - Parking study required Carwash and detail (full-service) 16 stalls Carwash (self-service and drive-thru) 2.5 per wash bay Service/gas station 3.0 per 1,000 sf+ 2 per service bay Barber shops/beauty parlors Park at retail Laundromats and/or dry cleaners Park at retail Offices, financial institutions, retail stores 4 per 1,000 sf Commercial storage yards (e.g., contractors, Separated from salvage) 6 spaces enclosed storage area Lumber yard 4 per 1,000 sf Includes area of open area devoted to display 81 Page 886 Use Spaces Notes of lumber and other products Applies only to the Mortuaries and funeral homes 1 per 35 sf assembly room floor area Motels and hotels 1 per unit + 2 2 additional spaces for manager Customer parking (additional spaces Vehicle sales, repair, service 2.5 per 1,000 sf needed for vehicle storage related to business operations) Furniture and appliance stores 2 per 1,000 sf Day cares/preschools 1 per employee + 1 per 5 children Storage for utility- 1 per 2 employees (2 owned vehicles must Public utilities uses also be provided for minimum) Commercial Recreation Uses Bowling alleys and/or billiard halls 5 per alley and/or 2 per table Stables 1 per 5 horses Additional parking Driving ranges 1 per tee required for related uses on site Additional parking Golf courses 6 per hole required for related uses on site Additional parking Miniature golf course 3 per hole required for related uses on site Includes related uses Skating rinks 5 per 1,000 sf and all indoor and outdoor"active" areas Included related uses Swimming pool (commercial) 5 per 1,000 sf and all indoor and outdoor"active" areas Additional parking Tennis, handball, and racquetball facilities 3 per court required for related uses on site Health clubs and other fitness related facilities 5 per 1,000 sf Educational Uses Elementary and junior high schools 2 per classroom Senior high school 1 per employee + 1 per 6 students 82 Page 887 Use Spaces Notes Colleges, universities 1 per 2 employees + 1 per 3 students Commercial schools (trade, business colleges, 1 per student + 1 per etc.) faculty Medical/Health Uses Dentist, medical, veterinary offices/clinics 5 per 1,000 sf Congregate care facilities (e.g., nursing, 1 per 4 beds Based on resident children's, sanitariums) capacity Hospitals 1.75 per bed Places of Assembly Restaurants and lounges 10 per 1,000 sf Fast-food restaurant 10 per 1,000 sf Auditoriums, sports arenas, stadiums 1 per 3 seats or 1 per Movie theaters 35 sf of seating area - Single screen 1 per 3 seats - Multi-screen 1 per 4 seats 1.5 linear feet on a 1 per 3 seats or 1 per bench is equivalent to 1 Other places of assembly (e.g., churches) seat; schedule of 35 sf of main auditorium activities and/or parking study may be required Industrial, Warehousing, and Manufacturing(1)(4) 1 per 1,000 sf for first 20,000 sf; 1 per 2,000 Warehouse/Storage/E-Commerce sf for the next 20,000 sf; and 1 per 4,000 sf for the remaining sf Industrial/manufacturing 2 per 1,000 sf Research and development 3 per 1,000 sf Office and administration 4 per 1,000 sf Multi-tenant buildings (office less than 35 percent GLA) (2) 2.5 per 1,000 sf Indoor wholesale/retail commercial 4 per 1,000 sf Table notes: Fifty percent of the total required covered spaces shall be within enclosed garage structures.The use of carports requires approval from the design review committee. (2) GLA is gross leasable area. (3) See section 17.64.100.D.4(Trailer parking required)for trailer parking requirements. (4) See section 17.64.120(Electric vehicle parking requirements)for electric vehicle parking requirements. B. Uses not listed. Other uses not specifically listed in this section shall furnish parking as required by the designated approving authority in determining the off-street parking requirements. The approving authority shall be guided by the requirements in this section generally and shall determine the minimum number of spaces required to avoid interference with public use of streets and alleys. (Code 1980, § 17.64.050; Ord. No. 855, §4, 2012; Ord. No. 863 § 4, 2013) 83 Page 888 17.64.060 Reductions in parking requirements. A. The required number of parking spaces may be reduced in accordance with the following requirements. B. Shared parking. In order to encourage efficient use of parking spaces and good design practices, the total parking requirements for conjunctive uses shall be based on the number of spaces adequate to meet various needs of the individual uses operating during the peak parking period. 1. Conditional use permit for shared parking. A conditional use permit may be approved for shared parking facilities serving more than one use on a site or serving more than one property. The conditional use permit may allow for a reduction of the total number of spaces required by this chapter if the following findings are made: a. The peak hours of parking demand from all uses do not coincide so that peak demand will not be greater than the parking provided. i. The efficiency of parking provided will equal or exceed the level that can be expected if parking for each use were provided separately. 2. Shared parking agreement. A written agreement between the landowners and in some cases the city that runs with the land shall be filed, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, and include: a. A guarantee that there will be no substantial alteration in the uses that will create a greater demand for parking without application for approval of an amended conditional use permit. b. A reciprocal grant of nonexclusive license among the business operator(s) and the landowner(s)for access to and use of the shared parking facilities. C. Evidence that the agreement has been recorded in the county recorder's office. C. Other parking reductions. Required parking for any use except a single-family dwelling, accessory dwelling unit, or two-family dwelling may be reduced through approval of a minor exception by the planning director. Required parking may be reduced with approval of a conditional use permit for all new industrial uses in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts. 1. Criteria for approval. The approving authority will only grant a minor use permit or a conditional use permit for reduced parking if it is determined that the project meets all of the minor use permit criteria in section 17.16.120 (Minor use permits) or the conditional use permit criteria in section 17.20.060 (Conditional use permit), and that three or more of the circumstances listed below are true. a. The use will be adequately served by the proposed parking due to the nature of the proposed operation; proximity to frequent transit service; transportation characteristics of persons residing, working, or visiting the site; or because the applicant has undertaken a travel demand management program that will reduce parking demand at the site. b. Parking demand generated by the project will not exceed the capacity of or have a detrimental impact on the supply of on-street parking in the surrounding area. C. The site plan is consistent with the objectives of the zoning district and incorporates features such as unobtrusive off-street parking placed below the 84 Page 889 ground level of the project with commercial uses above or enclosed parking on the ground floor. d. The applicant has provided on-site parking for car-share vehicles via a recorded written agreement between the landowner and the city that runs with the land. Agreement shall provide for proof of a perpetual agreement with a car-share agency to provide at least one car share vehicle on-site. 2. Application submittal requirements. In order to evaluate a proposed project's compliance with the above criteria,the planning director may require submittal of a parking demand study that substantiates the basis for granting a reduced number of spaces. D. Mixed use parking. All mixed use projects shall include a parking study prepared by a qualified traffic/parking consultant that demonstrates how proposed land uses utilize the parking spaces that are required per section 17.64.050-1. Parking studies are subject to review and acceptance by the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director, and an independent peer review consultant. The parking study may also include a discussion of the following options for a reduction of required parking, including, but not limited to: 1. Shared parking may be provided per section 17.64.060 B. 2. State density bonus may be provided per chapter 17.46. 3. Tandem parking may be counted towards the required parking calculation. 4. Implement a parking management strategy that may contain the following provisions, but are not limited to: a. Monitored with periodic inspections; b. Storage within the unit, and not within garage (view windows on garages); C. HOA to enforce limitation of number of vehicles per unit; d. Time restriction on guest parking; and e. Shuttles that cater to users within the development. 5. Implement a car/bicycle share program in which vehicles/bicycles are made available for shared use to individuals on a short term basis. (Code 1980, § 17.64.060; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 881 § 4, 2015; Ord. No. 938 § 9, 2018) E. Industrial use parking— "land banking". 1. If the final end-user has not been determined for an industrial development for which entitlements are requested pursuant to the provisions of this Code, and the parking and loading demand characteristics for the use are unknown, the anticipated maximum amount of employee, truck, and trailer parking specified in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use) shall be determined. In addition, the director may require the submittal of a parking and loading demand study to be prepared by the applicant or by the city and funded by the applicant. Such a study shall estimate the parking demand for the likely proposed use(s) including a worst case scenario based on the recommendations of the Institute of Traffic Engineers, Urban Land Institute, the American Planning Association, or other acceptable source of parking demand data for uses and/or combinations of uses of comparable activities, scale, bulk, area, and location. 2. The applicant shall submit a site plan acceptable to the director showing how all the parking for employees, trucks, and trailers will be provided on the site in compliance with the applicable requirements of this chapter. However, if the director determines that not all of the parking is required for the final proposed use(s), then subject to the provisions of section 17.14.100 (Modification), the excess "land banked" parking may be identified on the approved site plan and not constructed until such time as the parking is required 85 Page 890 for a future use(s). These areas shall be set aside as open space and landscaped in such a manner that they will not be used for parking. In addition, a binding covenant or other legal agreement in a form acceptable to the city attorney shall be submitted and signed by the property owner and tenant guaranteeing that the reserved open space will be constructed for employee, truck or trailer parking if a change to a more parking-intensive use occurs. 3. The applicant shall conduct a study of actual parking use to be carried out by a qualified consultant at the time of change of tenancy or within three years after the facility is fully occupied and the use established or at other such earlier time as deemed necessary by the director due to observed parking deficiencies or traffic queuing. The parking study shall be subject to approval by the director. The city may require construction of some or all of the additional parking if the parking study demonstrates need. If the owner fails to comply, the city may, but shall not be obligated to, undertake construction of the required additional parking. Any costs and expenses incurred by the city shall be the responsibility of the owner. 17.64.070 Parking management plan A. Purpose. This section provides regulatory standards governing the requirements of parking management plans in the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts. The purpose of the plan is to minimize traffic, manage on-site circulation, and effectively allocate parking needs for each industrial site. B. Applicability. A parking management plan shall be provided as part of a comprehensive effort for establishing employee, guest, truck, and trailer parking in a new industrial development within the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts and how those spaces are managed. C. Parking management plan. A parking management plan shall be processed as a part of the site development review, subject to approval of the planning commission. The plan shall comply with the following: 1. The parking management plan shall be based on a parking study documenting parking demand beyond the minimum allowance in Table 17.64.050-1 (Parking Requirements by Land Use). 2. The parking management plan shall identify the location of specific parking facilities and the number of parking spaces in such facilities that are available to meet the parking demand of the new development. 3. Parking identified on the plan shall be delineated as being reserved for employees, guests, trucks, or trailers, and whether other access control measures are used to ensure the availability and enforcement of the plan as well as on-site vehicle circulation. 4. The parking analysis shall demonstrate that parking for all users is provided, identifying existing supply and demand for similar uses and what will be provided on site. 5. The owner or manager designee of a development approved under the parking management plan shall provide an accurate and current record of the uses and parking allocation for the development. The planning director may require this record to be provided or updated annually if it is determined that parking for the proposed use is impacting adjacent streets, and when the owner applies for a change in use or development plan review for the subject site. 86 Page 891 17.64.080 Parking requirements for the disabled. A. Number of spaces, design standards. Parking spaces for the disabled shall be provided in compliance with the building code and state and federal law. B. Reservation of spaces required. The number of disabled accessible parking spaces required by this chapter shall be reserved by the property owner/tenant for use by the disabled throughout the life of the approved land use. C. Upgrading of markings required. If amendments to state or federal law change standards for the marking, striping, and signing of disabled access parking spaces, disabled accessible spaces shall be upgraded in the time and manner required by law. (Code 1980, § 17.64.070; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) 17.64.090 Parking and driveway design and development. A. Surface parking area. All surface parking areas shall have the following improvements: 1. Each required parking space and aisle shall be graded, drained, and surfaced so as to prevent dust, mud, or standing water and shall be identified by pavement markings, wheel stops, entrance and exit signing, and directional signs, to the satisfaction of the city engineer. All new parking spaces shall be painted with double stripe pavement markings. 2. Lighting, giving a ground-level illumination of one to five footcandles, shall be provided in the parking area during the time it is accessible to the public after daylight. Lighting shall be shielded to prevent glare on contiguous residential properties. 3. Where such parking area abuts a street, it shall be separated by an ornamental fence, wall, or compact evergreen hedge having a height of not less than two feet and maintained at a height of not more than four feet. Such fence, wall, or hedge shall be maintained in good condition. 4. Parking spaces shall be marked and access lanes clearly defined. Bumpers and wheel stops shall be installed, as necessary. 5. Landscape materials are permitted to overhang the curb/wheel stop creating a reduction in impervious surface material. B. Driveway location standards. Development projects located at intersections shall be accessed as follows: 1. Driveways to access parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall, where feasible, be gained through driveways from the lesser street. Determination of which street is lesser shall be made based on total paving width, amount of traffic, adjacent traffic controls, and likely destinations along each street in question. 2. Driveways serving parcels located at the intersection of two streets shall be situated at the maximum practical distance from the intersection. 3. Where a proposed driveway is located at least 75 feet from the nearest cross street, the requirements of section 17.64.90.C.1 and 2 may be waived. C. Driveway size and composition. All residential driveways shall be a minimum of 19 feet in length and shall be constructed with a lasting, durable surface (e.g., concrete, asphalt, grasscrete, or similar material) and shall be constructed to appropriate requirements as determined by the city. (Code 1980, § 17.64.080; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 860 § 4, 2013) 87 Page 892 17.64.100 Loading area requirements. A. Required loading spaces for delivery and distribution. A building, or part thereof, having a floor area of 10,000 square feet or more that is to be occupied by any use requiring the receipt or distribution by vehicles or trucks of material or merchandise must provide at least one off-street loading space, plus one additional such loading space for each additional 40,000 square feet of floor area. The off-street loading space(s) must be maintained during the existence of the building or use it is required to serve. Truck-maneuvering areas must not encroach into required parking areas, travelways, or street rights-of-way (see Figure 17.64.090-2 (Loading Areas for Delivery)). B. Required loading spaces for customers. Customer loading spaces allow bulky merchandise to be loaded into customers' vehicles. For uses that sell bulky items (furniture, appliances, home improvement sales, etc.), at least two customer loading spaces per business establishment or one customer loading space per 40,000 square feet of floor area, whichever is greater shall be provided. Customer loading spaces shall be located adjacent to the building or to an outdoor sales area where bulky merchandise is stored and shall be clearly visible from the main building entry or through directional signage visible from the main entry. Customer loading spaces shall not be located in such a way that they impede on-site traffic circulation, as determined by the director of engineering services/city engineer or encroach into designated emergency vehicle/fire access lanes as determined by the fire chief (see Figure 17.64.090-1 (Customer Loading Areas). C. Required loading spaces for industrial uses. All industrial uses shall provide a minimum of one loading space per proposed loading bay. For every 10 loading bays proposed, a minimum of one on-site truck queuing space must be provided. Each on-site truck queuing space shall be a minimum of nine feet in width and 65 feet in length and shall be included on the circulation management plan if required by the approving authority. The truck queuing spaces shall be grouped together in a designated area with clear access to loading bays. The entrance gate to all industrial buildings shall be a minimum of 135 feet from the public right-of-way. Alternative queuing standards less than the minimum required may be considered by the approving authority with a master plan and the development of an approved parking management plan. D. Requirements for off-street loading spaces. 1. Minimum size. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be not less than 12 feet wide, 30 feet long, and 15 feet high, exclusive of driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Loading spaces for customers may be 12 feet wide, 26 feet long, and 12 feet high. 2. Driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering areas. Each off-street loading space required by this section must be provided with driveways for ingress and egress and maneuvering space adequate for trucks, per city standards. 3. Location of loading areas. An off-street loading space (excluding loading spaces for customers) required by this section must not be located closer than 30 feet to any lot or parcel of land in a residential district, unless such off-street loading space is wholly enclosed within a building or on all sides by a wall not less than eight feet in height. Except in industrial zoning districts, a loading door or loading dock that is visible from a public street must be screened with an eight-foot high, solid masonry or other sound-absorbing wall, with landscaping planted between the wall and the right-of-way. 4. Trailer parking required. One parking space for a trailer is required for each loading dock door. The minimum dimensions of a single trailer parking space is 50 feet in length, 14 feet in width, and 14 feet in vertical clearance. Trailer parking spaces shall be located 88 Page 893 in a designated area located away from the loading bays and paths of travel. All trailer parking areas must be screened according to the provisions of section 17.48.050 (Requirements by land use type)for industrial areas. 17.64.110 Bicycle parking requirements. A. Applicability. Bicycle parking shall be provided for all new construction, additions of ten percent or more floor area to existing buildings, and changes in land use classification. Single- family homes, duplexes, and multi-family dwellings of less than four units are exempt. B. Number of required bicycle parking spaces. 1. Short-term bicycle parking. If a land use or project is anticipated to generate visitor traffic, the project must provide permanently anchored bicycle racks within 50 feet of the visitor's entrance. To enhance security and visibility the bicycle racks shall be readily visible to passers-by. The bicycle capacity of the racks must equal an amount equivalent to five percent of all required motorized vehicle parking. There shall be a minimum of one rack with capacity for two bicycles. 2. Long-term bicycle parking. Buildings with over ten tenant-occupants (e.g., multi- family tenants, owners, employees) shall provide secure bicycle parking for five percent of required motorized vehicle spaces, with a minimum of one space. Acceptable parking facilities shall be convenient from the street and include a power outlet for charging electric bicycles and one or a combination of the following: a. Covered, lockable enclosures with permanently anchored racks for bicycles, b. Lockable bicycle rooms with permanently anchored racks, C. Lockable, permanently anchored bicycle lockers. 17.64.120 Electric vehicle parking requirements. The following requirements apply to electric vehicle parking facilities. All charging facilities shall be approved through the plan check/zoning clearance process: A. Electric vehicle charging. When provided, electric vehicle charging stations shall meet the requirements of the California Electrical Code. B. Designated spaces. Outdoor charging of electric vehicle shall only occur in designated electric vehicle spaces, according to the following: 1. Electricity shall only be provided from outdoor electrical outlets installed according to the California Electrical Code. 2. Electric cords shall not cross vehicular or pedestrian pathways. 3. When installed in common parking areas (e.g., surface parking lots, garages, etc.), the spaces shall be restricted to electric vehicles charging only and identified with signage and pavement markings. C. Electric vehicles in single-family residential zoning districts. When installed, electric vehicle charging in single-family residential areas shall be located as follows: 1. Within a garage or carport; 89 Page 894 2. Outside of setback area; or 3. If within a setback area, screened from view of the public right-of-way with landscaping or fencing. (Code 1980, § 17.64.110; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) D. Electric vehicles in Industrial Zoning Districts. A minimum of 10 percent of required parking in all new developments within the Industrial Zoning Districts for employees and guests shall be reserved for electric vehicles and shall conform to the standards in subsections A and B above. One charging station shall be installed for every two spaces dedicated to electric vehicles. Additionally, charging stations for electric powered trucks may be required as determined by the approving authority. 17.64.130 Maintenance. The minimum number of parking spaces required in this chapter shall be provided and continuously maintained. A parking, loading, or bicycle parking area provided for the purpose of complying with the requirements of this chapter shall not be eliminated, reduced, or converted unless equivalent facilities approved by the approving authority are provided elsewhere in compliance with this chapter. 90 Page 895 Exhibit M Amendments to Chapter 17.66 (Performance Standards) Amended Section: 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. 17.66.110 Special industrial performance standards. A. Purpose. The performance standards allow industrial uses to operate consistent with the overall characteristics of the land use category to provide for a healthy, safe, and pleasing environment in keeping with the nature and level of surrounding industrial activity. The performance standards contained in Table 17.66.110-1 (Industrial Performance Standards) are applied based on the zoning districts as follows: 1. Industrial Park (IP) Zoning District; Class A performance standards. The most restrictive of the performance standards to ensure a high quality working environment and available sites for industrial and business firms whose functional and economic needs require protection from the adverse effects of noise, odors, vibration, glare, or high- intensity illumination, and other nuisances. 2. Neo-Industrial (NI) Zoning District; Class 8 performance standards. These standards are intended to enable a complementary mix of uses and provide for a limited range of industrial activity while assuring a basic level environmental protection. It is the intent of the standards of this section to provide for uses whose operational needs may produce noise, vibration, particulate matter and air contaminants, odors, or humidity, heat, and glare which cannot be mitigated sufficiently to meet the Class A standards. The standards are so designed to protect uses on adjoining sites from effects which could adversely affect their functional and economic viability. 3. Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning District; Class C performance standards. It is the intent of the standards of this section to make allowances for industrial uses whose associated processes produce noise, particulate matter and air contaminants, vibration, odor, humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensity illumination which would adversely affect the functional and economic viability of other uses. The standards, when combined with standards imposed by other governmental agencies, serve to provide basic health and safety protection for persons employed within or visiting the area. 91 Page 896 TABLE 17.66.110-1 INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Class A Class B Class C Noise Maximum • 70dB (anywhere on lot) • 80 dB (anywhere on lot) • 85 dB (lot line) • 65 dB (interior space of • 65dB (at residential property • 65dB (at residential property neighboring use on same lot) line) line) • Noise caused by motor • Noise caused by motor • Where a use occupies a lot vehicles is exempted from this vehicles and trains is exempted abutting or separated by a standard. from this standard. street from a lot within the designated Class A or B performance standard or residential property, the performance standard of the abutting property shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Vibration All uses shall be so operated as All uses shall be operated so as All uses shall be operated so as not to generate vibration not to generate vibration not to generate vibration discernible without instruments discernible without instruments discernible without instruments by the average person while on by the average persons beyond by the average person beyond or beyond the lot upon which the lot upon which the source is 600 feet from where the source the source is located or within located. Vibration caused by is located. Vibration caused by an adjoining enclosed space if motor vehicles, trains, and motor vehicles, trains, and more than one establishment temporary construction or temporary construction and occupies a structure. Vibration demolition is exempted from demolition is exempted from caused by motor vehicles, this standard. this standard. trains, and temporary construction or demolition work is exempted from this standard. Particulate Matter and Air Contaminants In addition to compliance with In addition to compliance with In addition to compliance with the Air Quality Management the AQMD standards, all uses the AQMD standards, all uses District (AQMD) standards, all shall be operated so as not to shall be operated so as not to uses shall be operated so as emit particulate matter or air emit particulate matter or air not to emit particulate matter or contaminants that are readily contaminants that (a) are air contaminants that are detectable without instruments injurious to the health of either readily detectable without by the average person beyond persons engaged in or related instruments by the average any lot line of the lot containing to the use of the lot, or persons person while on the lot such uses. residing, working, visiting, or containing such uses. recreating in neighboring areas; (b) substantially and adversely affect the maintenance of property in nearby areas; (c) are disruptive of industrial processes carried on in other parts of the industrial area. Where a use occupies a lot abutting or separated by a street lot with 92 Page 897 designated Class A or B, the A or B performance standard for particulate matter and air contaminants shall apply at the common or facing lot line. Odor All uses shall be operated so as All uses shall be operated so as All uses shall be operated so as not to emit matter causing not to emit matter causing not to emit matter causing unpleasant odors that are unpleasant odors that are unpleasant odors that are perceptible to the average perceptible to the average perceptible to the average person while within or beyond person beyond any lot line of person beyond any lot line of the lot containing such uses. the lot containing such uses. the lot containing such uses. Humidity, Heat, and Glare All uses shall be operated so as All uses shall be operated so as All uses shall be operated so as not to produce humidity, heat, not to produce humidity, heat, not to produce humidity, heat, glare, or high-intensity glare, or high-intensity glare, or high-intensity illumination that is perceptible illumination that is perceptible illumination that is perceptible without instruments by the without instruments by the without instruments by the average person while on or average person beyond the lot average person while on any lot beyond the lot containing such line of any lot containing such zoned for residential purposes use. use. or any industrial property with a Class A or B performance standard designation. 93 Page 898 Exhibit N Amendment to Chapter 17.76 (Alternative Energy Systems and Facilities) Amended Sections: 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. 17.76.020 Development criteria for systems. 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. 17.76.010 Purpose and applicability. This chapter sets forth provisions for the development of alternative energy systems to protect public health and safety while supporting efforts to develop small-scale, distributed energy generation to reduce the amount of electricity drawn from the regional power grid. (Code 1980, § 17.76.010; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012; Ord. No. 858 § 4, 2013) 17.76.020 Development criteria for solar systems. A. All new residential development projects, except condominium conversions, shall provide for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities (lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure in an east-west alignment for southern exposure or lot size and configuration permitting orientation of a structure to take advantage of shade or prevailing breezes). 1. Consideration shall be given to local climate, to contour, to lot configuration, and to other design and improvement requirements. 2. Consideration shall be given to provide the long axis of the majority of individual lots shall be within 22.5 degrees east or west of true south for adequate exposure for solar energy systems. B. In the Neo-Industrial (NI) and Industrial Employment (IE) Zoning Districts an on-site renewable energy system must be provided on all new industrial developments that include the construction of a new building, which meets the following standards. 1. The renewable energy system may be a solar collector system or other form of on- site renewable energy, provided such renewable energy source is recognized by the State of California as a renewable resource under the Renewable Portfolio Standard Program. 2. The renewable energy system shall be built to generate an amount of electricity sufficient to meet the following criteria: a. Annualized building demand based on the approved use or, if no use is proposed, then the demand for the most energy intensive use that could occupy the building; and b. Annualized demand required to charge fully electric vehicles and trucks, assuming that all vehicles and trucks to the site are fully electric; and C. A reasonable rate of efficiency loss over 10 years. 3. The renewable energy system shall be metered separately from the non- renewable metered power usage of the building. 4. Solar collectors may be installed on support structures that provide shade over parking areas to achieve minimum requirements. 94 Page 899 5. Developments subject to this section shall phase construction and operation of renewable energy sources pursuant to a phasing plan approved by the city engineer and subject to the following requirements: a. Renewable energy generation in each phase shall meet or exceed annualized demand for the facility described in subsection 2(a)through 2(c) above based on the proposed use, building design and operation and electric vehicles and trucks anticipated to be in operation during each phase; b. Identify thresholds and events that would prevent or cause progress to the next phase; c. Provide for biennial review and evaluation of the building and electrical demand for compliance with the phasing plan conditions; and d. Phasing plans shall include a tolling provision to delay implementation of all or a portion of the plan's implementation should the electric utility serving the development provide written certification that it can only accept a specified limited amount of renewable energy from the development along with an explanation of why and what events would trigger a change or increase in the amount accepted. The need for continued tolling shall be recertified by the electric utility as part of the biennial review and evaluation described in paragraph 5(c) above. C. No person shall allow a tree or shrub to be placed or grown so as to cast a shadow greater than ten percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., provided that this section shall not apply to specific trees and shrubs which at the time of installation of a solar collector or during the remainder of that annual solar cycle cast a shadow upon that solar collector. D. The location of a solar collector is required to comply with the local building and setback regulations and to be set back not less than five feet from the property line or any easement that is adjacent to the property line. E. Developers of all new residential subdivisions shall dedicate easements for the purpose of assuring that each lot or dwelling unit shall have the right to receive sunlight across adjacent lots or units for use of a solar energy system. The easements may be contained in a declaration of restrictions for the subdivision, which shall be recorded concurrently with recordation of the final map or issuance of permits, whichever shall first occur. The easements shall prohibit the casting of shadows by vegetation, structures, fixture, or any other object, except for utility wires and similar objects. 95 Page 900 FIGURE 17.76.020-1 SOLAR ACCESS 1 r' " e eMl!< i \ •. 7 R a N� No tree or shrub shall be placed or grown so as to \ cast a shadow greater than 10 percent of the collector absorption area upon that solar collector surface on the property of another at any one time \ between the hours of 10 a.m.and 2 p.m. FIGURE 17.76.020-2 SOLAR ORIENTATION N _�--T- -F i S��talf Wr to' ■ � s (Code 1980, § 17.76.020; Ord. No. 855, § 4, 2012) 17.76.030 Development standards for wind energy systems. A. General development standards. 1. Siting. Wind energy systems are prohibited on ridgelines. 2. Setbacks. All wind energy systems shall comply with existing setbacks for the zone in which it is located as well as any fire code setback requirements. 96 Page 901 3. Color. Structural components including, but not limited to, towers and blades shall be of a nonreflective, unobtrusive color. 4. Guy wires. The use of guy wires is prohibited. Towers shall be self-supporting. 5. Utility connections. For interconnected systems, no wind energy system shall be installed until evidence has been notified and indicated that the proposed interconnection is acceptable. On-site electrical wires associated with the system shall be installed underground, except for"tie-ins" to the electric utility service provider and its transmission poles, towers and lines. 6. Exterior lighting. Exterior lighting on any wind energy system shall be prohibited unless specifically required by the Federal Aviation Administration. 7. Signs. No advertising sign or logo shall be placed or painted on any wind energy system, including towers and blades. 8. Noise. All wind energy systems are subject to noise standards as outlined in section 17.66.050 (Noise Standards). 9. Rotor safety. All wind energy systems must be equipped with manual and automatic over-speed controls to limit the rotational speed of the blades within the design limits of the rotor. 10. Electromagnetic interference. All wind energy systems shall be designed, installed and operated so that no distributing electromagnetic interference is caused. Disruptive interference from the facility shall be promptly rectified to include the discontinued operation of the wind energy system. 11. FAA regulations. All wind energy systems shall comply with applicable FAA regulations, including any necessary approvals for installations to close to airports. B. Residential site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 40 feet in height above grade level. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 15 feet in height above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: One per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Two per parcel. C. Industrial site development standards. 1. Height. The maximum height for a small wind energy system is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems shall not exceed 100 feet above grade level measured from finished grade to the center of the turbine hub. ii. Roof-mounted systems shall not exceed 25 feet in height measured from the center of the turbine hub to the roof surface above the structure on which the system is mounted. 2. Number of systems. The maximum number of wind energy systems is limited as follows: i. Freestanding systems: Two per parcel. ii. Roof-mounted systems: Four per parcel. 97 Page 902 3. Tower access. Towers must provide one of the following: i. Tower climbing apparatus located no closer than 12 feet from the ground; ii. Have an anti-climb device installed on the tower; iii. Provide a tower-access limitation program approved by the reviewing authority. D. Abandoned wind energy systems. Any wind energy system that is not used for a consecutive 12-month period shall be deemed abandoned. The property owner or permittee shall remove the wind energy system, clear the site of all equipment and restore the site as nearly as practicable to the condition prior to the installation of the wind energy system. 98 Page 903 Exhibit O Amendments to Section 17.126.090 Amended Section: 17.126.020 Universal Definitions. 17.126.020 Universal definitions. Parking Study describes a report prepared by a qualified traffic/parking engineer for review and acceptance by the director of engineering services/city engineer and planning director that analyzes the amount of parking proposed for a site relative to the parking demand generated by a proposed use(s). The report may include calculations and recommendations for reducing the number of parking spaces for a proposed use(s) and an analysis of shared on-site parking. The report may include parking counts of vehicles parked in an area during selected days and times to evaluate the ratio of available parking spaces to the number of vehicles parked . A parking study may also provide details on any recommended transportation demand management measures. 99 Page 904 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING-ITEM G2.ADDITIONAL MATERIAL-RECEIVED JULY 6,2021 AT 3:21PM ,r Hans Van Ligten RUTAN Direct Dial: (714)662-4640 RUlAN TUCKER ALP E-mail:hvanligtenagrman.com July 6, 2021 ` Honorable Mayor and Members of the City r= Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Sent Via Email to: City.Clerk@CityofRC.us and Council@CityofRC.us Re: Proposed Development Code Amendment-July 7, 2021 City Council Agenda Item G2 Dear Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: As you are aware, this office represents Phelan Development Company ("Phelan") the current owner of the industrial properties located 9168 Hermosa Avenue, 11701 6th Street, and a Class A project which is currently under construction with assigned addresses of 8738, 8768 and 8798 E. 9th Street. Previously, Phelan, both through our previous letter as well as the written and oral comments, has provided objections to the proposed amendment to the City of Rancho Cucamonga's ("City") Development Code (Title 17 of the City's Municipal Code) which was originally set for the City Council's June 16, 2021 meeting. Unfortunately,the City has failed to address both the procedural and substantive infirmities identified in our prior objections, and those deficiencies still stand and must be addressed prior to the City lawfully considering the proposed amendment. In addition, Phelan has also taken the time from the June 16, 2021 meeting to perform an analysis of the potential traffic impacts of the City's proposed amendment whose stated purpose is to prohibit and limit certain industrial uses within the City. A copy of this report is attached here to be added into the record for this proceeding. �N As most relevant to this proceeding, the traffic engineer opines that in his professional opinion that the City's proposed amendment could result in significant impacts throughout the region that must be assessed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act r ("CEQA"). In particular, after reviewing the pertinent vehicle miles travelled ("VMT") metrics found in the Southern California Association of Governments' (SCAG) San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM), he notes the following: �r 18575 Jamboree Road, 9th Floor, Irvine, CA 92612 1 714.641.5100 1 Fax 714.546.9035 2545/027225 -0004 16676701.1 a07/02/21OZ/21 Orange County I Palo Alto I San Francisco I www.rutan.com RU TAN RUTAN!TUCm,LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga July 6, 2021 Page 2 Data from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) shows that the demand for industrial and warehousing in Southern California, and especially in the Inland Empire, is increasing. If the proposed changes to the development code makes it difficult for future industrial and warehousing projects to be built in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the demand will result in such uses to relocate to the adjacent cities, which have a higher share of industrial uses than Rancho Cucamonga. Therefore, the burden of truck VMT in the surrounding cities will increase even more. Further, if current buildings cannot be leased for industrial and warehousing uses without substantial planning reviews by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, even existing uses could move to adjacent jurisdictions, increasing the disparity further. ,since truck TVMT substantially increases greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) as well as air quality (AQ), the effect of the proposed changes by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on adjacentjurisdictions should require an evaluation under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). While level of service (LOS) is not an impact under CEQA, many jurisdictions (including Rancho Cucamonga) require the evaluation of traffic delay and levels of service. The proposed development code changes can result in substantial increase in traffic volumes (both truck and automobile) in adjacent jurisdictions. Accordingly, the City's attempt to rely on the "common-sense" exemption is improper, and not supported by the record. (See Rominger v. County of Colusa (2014) 229 Cal.AppAth 690, 704, disapproved of on other grounds by Union ofMedical Maryuana Patients, Inc. v. City of San Diego (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 ["For the commonsense exemption to apply,the [agency] would have to show as a factual matter, based on the evidence in the record, that there is no possibility that the approval of the [project] may result in a significant effect on the environment. . ."].) The case of Rominger is directly on point. There, the County of Colusa argued that the approval of a subdivision map qualified as exempt under the commonsense exemption. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument, finding that the County failed to meet its burden to show that there was no possibility that subdivision of the property would not actually result in the creation of smaller parcels and lead to the development of those parcels. (Id.) will be achieved and the creation of the smaller parcels will not lead to the development of those parcels and to resulting significant environmental effects. Likewise, here, the clear goal of the proposed amendment is to prohibit or severely limit the development of industrial and warehousing uses within the City. As explained above, there is a significant likelihood that the proposed amendment would result in significant impacts to traffic (in both the LOS and VMT context), greenhouse gas emissions, and air quality throughout the 2545/027225-0004 16676701.1 a07/02/21 RUTAN RUYAN 6 TUCKER,LLP Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga July 6, 2021 Page 3 region. Accordingly, the City must conduct the proper CEQA analysis prior to adopting this proposed amendment. In conclusion, Phelan again reiterates its request that the City not approve the proposed development code amendment at this time, and instead continue working with impacted parties like Phelan to reach a solution that is beneficial to all parties. In any event, the adoption of the Development Code Amendment with no environmental analysis will violate CEQA, and will be invalid. To the extent necessary, Phelan incorporates by reference and restates here all of its prior objections in the record, and adopts the well-founded objections of others who made comments orally and in writing at the June 16th City Council meeting. Sincerely, RUTAN &TUCKER, LLP C&O OOJ'-'4&-- Hans Van Ligten HVL:TV Enclosure 2545/027225-0004 16676701.1 a07/02/21 Phelan Development Company 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 405 P H E LAN Newport Beach, CA 92660 D E v E L o P M E N T TEL: 949.720.8050 FAX 944.720.8090 July 5, 2021 Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Sent Via Email to: City.Clerk@CityofRC.us and Council@CityofRC.us Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: Phelan Development Company and its affiliates have developed more than 35 industrial buildings in the City of Rancho Cucamonga. We currently own the properties located at 9168 Hermosa Avenue, 11701 6th Street, and a Class A project which is currently under construction with assigned addresses of 8738, 8768 and 8798 E. 9th Street. At the June 16, 2021 City Council meeting,we expressed our objections to the proposed amendment to Title 17(Development Code) of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. We have worked with City Staff since that meeting in an attempt to have our concerns addressed. The City's desire to establish new zoning districts, amend land uses, and create new development standards for industrial development is understandable. However, the proposed change in allowed uses would be retroactive to include previously developed and occupied buildings, classifying existing tenants who do not fall under the permitted uses as non-conforming. Phelan Development's project currently under construction was approved by the Planning Commission in January 2020, and building permits were issued in January 2021. The project is speculative construction, meaning that no tenants were identified for the property prior to starting construction. When properties are developed on a speculative basis, ultimate flexibility is critical to the project's success. Construction is currently scheduled to be complete in November 2021. According to the proposed zoning map, included in the draft General Plan Update,this property is proposed to be re-zoned to MU Neighborhood Corridor. Such a zoning designation would not allow any industrial uses at all. The presumably accurate zoning designation for this property of Neo-Industrial is also unacceptable given the limited industrial uses it allows as compared to the current zoning designation of General Industrial. The proposed General Plan Update (Public Review Draft: May 2021) suggests the establishment of the Neo-Industrial Zoning District, replacing the previously known General Industrial Zoning District (Table 17.26.020-1).According to the draft General Plan Update,the Neo-Industrial Zone will be established to support the growth of creative industries and is not intended for conventional industrial businesses such as warehousing and distribution. This shift has had a dramatic impact Page 1 of 2 on the Allowed Land Uses outlined in the previous General Plan. Pursuant to Section 17.30.030 of the Public Review Draft: May 2021, there are multiple industrial, manufacturing, and processing uses would no longer be permitted in the Neo-Industrial Zone that had previously been permitted in the General Industrial Zone. Notably: a. Manufacturing Light—Previously (P); Now (N) b. Manufacturing, Medium—Previously (P); Now (N) c. Storage Yard—Previously (P);Now (N) d. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Heavy—Previously (C);Now (N) e. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Medium—Previously (P); Now (C) f. Wholesale, Storage, and Distribution—Light—Previously (P); Now (C) Most concerning is the proposed change in allowed uses to prohibit or require additional discretionary approvals for traditional warehouse uses tied to occupancy. We have suggested to City Staff that all discretionary approvals be handled at the developer's level. This would allow any required Conditional Use Permit(s)to be obtained during entitlement approvals for the project rather than leaving undue responsibility to occupants of the buildings. Allowing developers to obtain discretionary approvals related to occupancy will decrease the likelihood of vacancy and avoid ancillary vacancy-related issues. While we appreciate the City's offer to provide a 180 day exemption for projects that are currently under construction, it is not appropriate to suddenly impose occupancy limitations that did not previously exist. The project we have under construction is being developed under open permits issued by the City this year. Adoption of the proposed development code will devalue the real estate by creating additional leasing-related burdens and could constitute a taking, whereby the City will be responsible for the loss in value. Our goal is to avoid any negative outcomes and to stabilize this property in a manner that will result in genuine satisfaction for the community. It makes sense that our interests are aligned in this regard. We would welcome the opportunity to meet with members of the City Council to discuss this important matter. Sincerely, PHELAN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY atrma e ey Cc: Jeff Phelan, Phelan Development Company Hans Van Lighten, Rutan & Tucker Page 2 of 2 m c m o r a n J u m DATE: July 6, 2021 TO: Hans Van Ligten, JD, Rutan &Tucker, LLP FROM: Sandipan Bhattacharjee, PE, TE, AICP, ENV-SP • SUBJECT: Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Update Translutions,Inc.(Translutions)is pleased to provide our opinion discussing the traffic and greenhouse gas implications of the proposed changes to the Rancho Cucamonga Development Code. Based on our conversation, it is our understanding that the proposed changes could impact development of industrial and warehousing related uses. Further, it is also our understanding that the proposed changes could potentially affect existing industrial buildings since it could make future leases tenuous and subject to new approvals. At your request, we have summarized our findings as to why the proposed changes could have impacts under CEQA. Primarily, we have focused this discussion on truck traffic and related impacts. Translutions reviewed the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model (SBTAM) to review truck vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for truck trip with origins or destinations in the City of Rancho Cucamonga and surrounding cities of Fontana,Ontario,and Chino.This was based on the review of model outputs from the 2016 and 2040 SBTAM. Table A summarizes the truck VMT for Rancho Cucamonga and adjoining Cities. Table A—Truck VMT by City Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Ontario Chino Year2016 413,740 419,127 759,966 291,695 Year204O 584,594 592,507 1,019,607 410,017 Change 170,854 173,380 259,641 1 118,322 As seen on Table A, under 2016 conditions, VMT generated by the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the second lowest among the four cities, with the exception of the City of Chino. In addition, with the exception of the City of Chino, the increase in truck VMT between the base and future year conditions is the lowest for the City of Rancho Cucamonga. It should be noted that the employment in the City of Rancho Cucamonga is 77% higher than the City of Chino,which is one of the reasons why the VMT is lower in the City of Chino. We also reviewed the truck VMT per employee for the cities we evaluated. The findings are shown in Table B. Table B-Truck VMT/Employee(Year 2016 Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Ontario Chino Truck VMT 413,740 419,127 759,966 291,695 Employment 87896 56954 113625 49655 VMTIEmployee 1 4.7 7.4 6.7 1 5.9 As seen on Table B, under 2016 conditions,the truck VMT/employee for the City of Rancho Cucamonga is the lowest among the four cities. This shows that the share of industrial employment over total employment in Rancho Cucamonga is lower than the adjacent cities. Review of truck VMT per employee for year 2040 shows a similar pattern, Table C shows the VMT/employee for the cities under evaluation. Memorandum: Rancho Cucamonga Development Code Update July 6,2021 Table C-Truck VMTIEmployee(Year 2040) • Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Ontario Chino Truck VMT 584,594 592,507 1,019,607 410,017 Employment 103368 75360 175983 51491 VMTIEmployee 5.7 7.9 5.8 8.0 Tables B and C demonstrate that the burden of truck related VMT per employee is lowest in the City of Rancho Cucamonga both under existing and in future conditions. Data from the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) shows that the demand for industrial and warehousing in Southern California, and especially in the Inland Empire, is increasing. If the proposed changes to the development code makes it difficult for future industrial and warehousing projects to be built in the City of Rancho Cucamonga,the demand will result in such uses to relocate to the adjacent cities,which have a higher share of industrial uses than Rancho Cucamonga.Therefore,the burden of truck VMT in the surrounding cities will increase even more. Further, if current buildings cannot be leased for industrial and warehousing uses without substantial planning reviews by the City of Rancho Cucamonga, even existing uses could move to adjacent jurisdictions, increasing the disparity further. Since truck VMT substantially increases greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) as well as air quality (AQ), the effect of the proposed changes by the City of Rancho Cucamonga on adjacent jurisdictions should require an evaluation under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA). While level of service(LOS) is not an impact under CEQA, many jurisdictions(including Rancho Cucamonga)require the evaluation of traffic delay and levels of service. The proposed development code changes can result in substantial increase in traffic volumes (both truck and automobile) in adjacent jurisdictions. 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G2.ADDITIONAL MATERIAL- RECEIVED JULY 7,2021 AT 4:22 PM From: "Klebaner, Liz" <Klebaner@nossaman.com> Date:July 7, 2021 at 4:21:54 PM PDT To: imarkman@rwlaw.com, Steven Flower<sflower@rwglaw.com>, nghirelli@rwglaw.com Cc: City Clerk<City.Clerk@cityofrc.us> Subject: RE: 2021-07-07-SCE Supplemental Comments on Ordinance 982 Good afternoon, It appears that the City of Rancho Cucamonga has eliminated the public's ability to participate and make comments at City Council meetings remotely. The agenda for tonight's City Council meeting did not advise the public of this change. Accordingly, Edison will not be making an in-person appearance at this evening's City Council meeting. The City's failure to place the public on notice of available opportunities for addressing the Council further underscores Edison's concerns that the City is not fostering public participation and is proceeding contrary to the letter and spirit of the Ralph M. Brown Act. Please also note that the City was required, pursuant to Government Code section 54957.5, subdivision (b)(1), to make any writing that is a public record and relates to an agenda item of a regular meeting of the City Council available for public inspection at the time the writing is distributed to all, or a majority of all, of the members of the City Council. As discussed in Edison's supplemental written comments on City Council agenda item G2, the agenda packet for the July 7 City Council meeting was made available over the holiday weekend and fewer than 72 hours ahead of tonight's meeting. As such, the agenda packet should have been made publicly available no later than when it was distributed to the City Council. The City's posting of the agenda alone does not constitute substantial compliance with the Brown Act. Liz Klebaner Attorney at Law NOSSAMAN LLP 777 South Figueroa Street, 34th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90017 Iklebaner(c�nossaman.com T 213.612.7800 F 213.612.7801 D 213.612.7880 SUBSCRIBE TO E-ALERTS nossaman.com PLEASE NOTE: The information in this e-mail message is confidential. It may also be attorney-client privileged and/or protected from disclosure as attorney work product. If you have received this e-mail message in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, nor disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in it. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you. From: Robbins,Judith P. <jrobbins@nossaman.com>On Behalf Of Klebaner, Liz Sent: Wednesday,July 7, 2021 3:48 PM To:JMarkman@rwglaw.com; SFlower@rwglaw.com; NGhirelli@rwglaw.com Cc: Klebaner, Liz<Ilebaner@nossaman.com> Subject: 2021-07-07 -SCE Supplemental Comments on Ordinance 982 Please see attached a courtesy copy of comments provided to the City Clerk today. A hard copy of the comments will follow. Judith P. Robbins NOSSAMAN LLP T 213.612.7800 F 213.612.7801 D 213.312.8307 F S ; SUBSCRIBE TO E-ALERTS California EminentDomainReport.com PLEASE NOTE: The information in this e-mail message is confidential. It may also be attorney-client privileged and/or protected from disclosure as attorney work product. If you have received this e-mail message in error or are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy, nor disclose to anyone this message or any information contained in it. Please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message. Thank you. 7/7/2021 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - ITEM G2. ADDITIONAL MATERIAL - RECEIVED JULY 7, 2021 AT 1:36PM ATTORNEYS AT LAW 777 South Figueroa Street 34th Floor Los Angeles,# N O S S A M A N LLP T 213.612.7800A 90017 F 213.612.7801 Elizabeth Klebaner D 949.477.7682 Ilebaner@nossaman.com Refer To File#- VIA EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL July 7, 2021 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga 10500 Civic Center Drive Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 Email: City.Clerk(a)-Cityof RC.us Re: City Council Meeting; July 7, 2021, Item No. G2 (Continued Public Hearing/First Reading of Ordinance No. 982)— Supplemental Comments of Southern California Edison Dear Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council: Nossaman LLP is outside counsel to Southern California Edison ("Edison") in connection with the above matter. For reasons unknown, the City of Rancho Cucamonga ("City") is proceeding with a General Plan update and implementing land use regulations that conflict with Edison's infrastructure and depart from Edison's and the City's long established foundational commitments to collaborate as community partners. As a property owner and operator of the Etiwanda Substation, the Rancho Vista Substation, and the Grapeland Peaker Plant -- all located within the City's industrial core -- Edison has a direct interest in the City's proposal to overhaul the Development Code as it relates to the City's regulation of its industrial zones. Edison's infrastructure serves millions of ratepayers, including the City itself. The above assets, including their supporting above-ground and underground infrastructure, are necessary to maintain a reliable supply of electricity in Southern California. These comments supplement and incorporate by reference Edison's June 16, 2021 comments on proposed Ordinance No. 982, Amending Title 17 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Modify Administrative Procedures within the Development Code and Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses and Definitions and Create New Development Standards for Industrial Development within the City ("Ordinance No. 982"). As a threshold matter, the City's proposed action on Ordinance No. 982 scheduled for review and consideration on July 7, 2021 violates the Ralph M. Brown Act and should therefore be withdrawn from the agenda. As explained below, the City compounds its Brown Act violation by also failing to adequately consider the practical consequences of its decision making in violation of both the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the Planning and Zoning Law. Edison, therefore, requests that the City take Item G2 off its agenda for the July 7, 2021 City Council meeting, and direct the City's staff to both meet with Edison and incorporate 58134597.v2 nossaman.com Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 2 meaningful modifications to both, Ordinance No. 982 and the forthcoming General Plan Update in a manner that would: (i) preserve Edison's ability to develop infrastructure supportive of the City; (ii) eliminate conflicts and demonstrate compliance with state law and state regulation of Edison's facilities; (iii) fully address the environmental impacts of the City's proposed land use changes in one Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"); and (iv) as a practical matter, ensure that the City's contemplated development program will actually be capable of being implemented. Edison must respectfully reserve its right to supplement these comments and all of its other rights and remedies as may be required to challenge the City's actions. 1. THE CITY IS IN VIOLATION OF THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT. The City's failure to adequately notice the subject hearing constitutes a clear violation of the Brown Act. Specifically, the agenda packet for the City Council's July 7, 2021 meeting was published on July 5, 2021. This is less than the 72 hours' notice required by the Brown Act. (See Gov. Code, § 54954.2, subd. (a)(1).) The materials provided for the Council's consideration of Item G2 (Ordinance No. 982) include a new staff report, a revised version of the 93-page ordinance with interlineated changes not shown for ease of reference, and an entirely new 15- page technical memorandum that purports to analyze the environmental impacts of Ordinance No. 982. The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the agenda for a public meeting to be posted a minimum of 72 hours in advance of the meeting. (Gov. Code, § 54954, subd. (a); Gov. Code, § 54954.2, subd. (a)(1).) Members of the public can seek declaratory and injunctive relief against a government agency for engaging in practices that violate the mandates of the Brown Act. (Gov. Code, § 54960.) The City's posting of the agenda packet a mere two days before the City Council's proposed first reading of Ordinance No. 982 and during the Fourth of July holiday weekend does not constitute substantial compliance with the Brown Act and continues the City's practice of disregarding open government laws in connection with the proposed adoption of Ordinance No. 982. Edison demands that the City again continue the public hearing on item G2 to allow the public sufficient time under the Brown Act to review and comment on Ordinance No. 982. 2. ORDINANCE NO. 982 FAILS TO SPECIFY AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR PENDING APPLICATIONS. Section 17.02.020(F) of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Development Code requires successive amendments to title 17 to "specify their applicability to pending applications and projects not yet under construction." Ordinance No. 982 fails to specify the effective date of the ordinance as it relates to existing and proposed uses. Edison, like other property owners in the area, has been working in good faith with City staff for many months on potential new development concepts that would foster new or expanded uses in the city's key Southeast Industrial Quadrant area. Ordinance No. 982 would effectively negate these efforts. Edison, therefore, respectfully requests Ordinance No. 982 to be revised as follows: 58134597.v2 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 3 New Section 21. The ordinance shall not apply to projects in process, pursuant to Section 17.02.020(F) of this title, or to all land use permit applications that have been received and are active before the effective date of Ordinance No. 982, or any amendments thereto. 3. THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 982 IS NOT EXEMPT FROM CEQA REVIEW. A. The City's Determination That the "Common Sense" Exemption from CEQA Review Applies Is Unsupported. As discussed in Edison's June 16 comment letter, the City's determination that "it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility' that Ordinance No. 982 "may have a significant effect on the environment" and is therefore exempt from CEQA review is unsupported.) "Argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, [and] evidence which is clearly erroneous or inaccurate . . . does not constitute substantial evidence. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15384, subd. (a).) The technical memorandum the City commissioned after receiving public comments at the June 16 public hearing on Ordinance No. 982 ("Technical Memo") summarily fails to substantiate the City's CEQA determination because it is legally flawed and misleading. A description of the existing physical conditions is essential to a CEQA impact analysis, as it provides a baseline against which the project's impacts may be measured. (See CEQA Guidelines, §§ 15063, subd. (d), 15125; see also Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority(2013) 57 CalAth 439, 447.) The Technical Memo does not characterize the existing physical conditions for purposes of the City's purported environmental analysis. Instead, the Technical Memo compares the project's impacts against those activities that are currently permitted under the City's Development Code. The California Supreme Court has rejected the use of such a hypothetical environmental baseline as misleading and inconsistent with CEQA. (See Communities for a Better Environment v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (2010) 48 CalAth 310, 320.) The conclusions of the Technical Memo are, therefore, inherently unreliable and legally irrelevant. The Technical Memo also fails entirely to address Edison's prior comments, namely, that Ordinance No. 982 may result in potentially significant public health impacts by authorizing sensitive receptors, such as child daycare facilities, adjacent to existing industrial operations.2 Indeed, the City consultant's statement that Ordinance No. 982 does not authorize new uses "not currently allowed in the City" does not address the comment that Ordinance No. 982 would authorize residences, child daycare facilities, and schools in an industrial zone of the City. The Technical Memo is also incorrect and misleading in other respects. For example, the City's consultant goes to great lengths to characterize Ordinance No. 982 as a "refinement" and 1 Edison June 16, 2021 Comments, p. 4, emphasis added; see also July 7, 2021 City Council Meeting Agenda, citing Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14 ("CEQA Guidelines"), 15061, subd. (b)(3). 2 See Technical Memo, pp. 10-11 [Air Quality and Hazards]. 58134597.v2 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 4 continuation of the City's land use regulations. However, these statements directly contradict staff's own analysis and the very purpose of Ordinance No. 982, which is to make substantive changes to the City's zoning and entitlements processes by adding "new industrial land uses . . . to reflect changes in the patterns and intensities of industrial development."3 Edison believes the City's revisions are in actuality a wholesale re-write of the City's industrial land development regulations. Therefore, the City's reliance on the "common sense" CEQA exemption is utterly unsupported. 4. THE CITY IS REQUIRED TO PREPARE AND CERTIFY AN EIR BEFORE IT MAY ADOPT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENTS. An EIR is required to be prepared whenever there is a fair argument based on substantial evidence that a project may result in a potentially significant impact on the environment. (Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v. City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.AppAth 1597, 1602.) This standard effectuates CEQA's strong presumption in favor of environmental review and sets a low threshold for the preparation of an EIR. (Consolidated Irrigation Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.AppAth 187, 207.) Here, there is a fair argument based on substantial evidence that the proposed Development Code amendments will result in potentially significant public utilities and land use impacts. As explained in Edison's prior letters to the City, Ordinance No. 982 will adversely impact Edison's existing operations and will result in a potentially significant impact on air quality and public health by exposing sensitive populations to criteria air pollutant and toxic air contaminant concentrations that exceed health screening levels. The City's industrial zones host a concentration of heavy industrial facilities that emit dangerous levels of pollutants.4 The City has not considered the cumulative impact of these emissions, nor prepared a health risk assessment that evaluates the impact of these facilities, on sensitive receptors that the City proposes to authorize in the City's industrial core. There is a fair argument based on substantial evidence that Ordinance No. 982 may exacerbate existing hazards by authorizing sensitive receptors to be located adjacent to, and in the vicinity of, heightened concentrations of regulated air pollutants.5 3 May 26, 2021 Staff Report, p. 4. 4 Edison has superimposed the existing industrial processes that are located within the City's industrial core and that are listed on the South Coast Air Quality Management District's ("SCAQMD")web page onto the City's current General Plan EIR land use map, available at https://www.citVofrc.us/General Plan, and included the image in Exhibit 1 to these comments. The list of existing SCAQMD regulated facilities within the City and detailed facility data are available on SCAQMD's webpage by clicking on each facility in the table at the following link https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/faccrit.php?dd=&grp=1&sort=FacilityNameA&dbyr=2019&ab = &dis =&co =&fname =&city =rancho+cucamonga&fzip =&fsic =&facid =&all fac=C&displayit=Pollutant &showpol=&showpol2 and are also included in Exhibit 2 to these comments. 5 There is consensus among state and federal regulators that long-term exposure to criteria air pollutants and toxic air contaminants above health screening levels results in adverse public health impacts. These effects are more severe in the case of sensitive receptors, which are defined by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency("EPA")to include daycare facilities and schools. (EPA, What Are Sensitive Receptors?, available at https://www3.e pa.qov/reg ion 1/eco/uep/sensitivereceptors.htm1; see also California Office of 58134597.v2 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 5 (See California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management Dist. (2015) 62 Cal Ath 369.) 5. ORDINANCE NO. 982, IF ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, WOULD BE VOID AB INITIO. As explained below, Ordinance No. 982 is inconsistent with the City's General Plan. This is yet further evidence of the City's race to completion without adequately considering either the practical or the legal limitations of a complete overhaul of the City's industrial zoning regulations. California law mandates that jurisdictions carefully scrutinize modifications to land development codes to ensure that they are consistent with the applicable general plan. (Gov. Code, §65860, subd. (a); Resource Defense Fund v. County of Santa Cruz(1982) 133 Cal. App. 3d 800, 806.) Consistency requires that the various land uses authorized by the zoning ordinance be compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the general plan. (Gov. Code, §65860, subd. (a); City of Irvine v. Irvine Citizens Against Overdevelopment (1994) 25 Cal. App. 4th 868, 879.) "The Planning and Zoning Law itself precludes consideration of a zoning ordinance which conflicts with a general plan as a pro tanto repeal or implied amendment of the general plan. The general plan stands." (Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek(1990) 52 Cal. 3d 531, 541.) "A zoning ordinance that is inconsistent with the general plan is invalid when passed." (Id., citing deBottari v. City Council(1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 1204, 1212 and Sierra Club v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 126 Cal.App.3d 698, 704.) "The Planning and Zoning Law does not contemplate that general plans will be amended to conform to zoning ordinances. The tail does not wag the dog. The general plan is the charter to which the ordinance must conform." (Ibid., emphasis added.) Ordinance No. 982 is in conflict with the land use plan and with the goals, policies and objectives of the current Rancho Cucamonga General Plan and, therefore, would be invalid upon its enactment. For these reasons, described more fully below, Edison respectfully disagrees with the City consultant's conclusion that the enactment of Ordinance No. 982 is not required to be preceded by a General Plan amendment.6 A. Ordinance No. 982 Is in Conflict With the General Plan Land Use Map Ordinance No. 982 would authorize "live-work" residences, parks and public plazas, schools and specialized education training centers, business support services, restaurants, retail, Environmental Health Hazard Assessment("OEHHA"), Health Studies of Criteria Pollutants, available https://oehha.ca.gov/air/health-studies-criteria-air-pollutants; OEHHA, Toxic Air Contaminants, available at https://oehha.ca.gov/air/toxic-air-contaminants;OEHHA, 2015 Air Toxic Hot Spots Risk Assessment Guidelines, available at https://oehha.ca.gov/air/crnr/notice-adoption-air-toxics-hot-spots-program-guidance- manual-preparation-health-risk-0 .) Even short-term exposure to coarse particulate matter(PM10) can lead to adverse public health impacts. (Malig &Ostro, Coarse particles and mortality: evidence from a multi-city study in California, available at https://oem.bm'.com/content/66/12/832.) 6 See June 28, 2021 Placeworks Technical Memo, p. 4. 58134597.v2 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 6 and child daycare facilities in areas of the City currently designated for Heavy Industrial, Light Industrial, or Warehouse/Distribution land use designations. (Compare Ordinance No. 982, Table 17.30.030-1 and 2010 General Plan EIR, Exhibit 3-3, available at https://www.cityofrc.us/General Plan.) These newly permitted and newly conditionally permitted uses within the City's industrial core conflict with the current General Plan, which contemplates industrial uses "south of Foothill Boulevard." (General Plan EIR, p. 3-1.) B. Ordinance No. 982 Is in Conflict With the General Plan Health and Safety Element. General Plan Goal PS-10 sets forth the City's objective to "Maintain good local air quality, and reduce the local contributions of airborne pollutants to the air basin." (General Plan, Public Health and Safety Element, p. PS-61.) Policies PS-10.2, PS-10.3, and PS-10.5, implement Goal PS-10 by requiring the City to integrate land use planning with air quality and economic development considerations, consider surrounding land uses when locating sensitive receptors and "avoid placing sensitive land uses adjacent to heavy industrial areas." (Id. at pp. PS- 61-62, emphasis added.) As discussed above, Ordinance No. 982 permits sensitive receptors, such as child daycare facilities and schools, to be sited adjacent to heavy industrial operations, in direct conflict with the General Plan Health and Safety Element. C. Ordinance No. 982 Is in Conflict With the General Plan Housing Element. The General Plan Housing Element provides for"housing opportunities that meet the needs of all economic segments of the community including very low, low-, and moderate- income households and special needs groups." (General Plan, Housing Element, Goal HE-2, p. HE-77.) The provision of temporary emergency shelters and transitional housing opportunities is an express Housing Element objective and policy. (Id. at p. HE-78.) Ordinance No. 982 would disallow emergency shelters in the City's industrial zones. The City's Development Code currently authorizes emergency shelters only in commercial and industrial zones. There are no emergency shelters operating within the City, according to online directories.7 The City's proposed elimination of emergency shelters from the list of conditionally permitted uses within the City's industrial core further reduces opportunities for local organizations and community groups in areas of the City where emergency shelters may face less opposition from neighboring residential communities. As such, Ordinance No. 982 is in direct conflict with the General Plan Housing Element. 6. CONCLUSION. We urge the City to delay action on Ordinance No. 982 until such time that the City has complied with the Brown Act, put forward a legally feasible ordinance amendment, and has fully complied with CEQA's requirements for the preparation of an EIR that cohesively and fully 7 Homeless Assistance US, https://www.homelessassistance.us/ci/ca-rancho cucamonga; Homeless Shelters Directory, https://www.homelessshelterdirectory.org/city/ca-rancho cucamonga 58134597.v2 Mayor and Members of the City Council c/o City Clerk City of Rancho Cucamonga July 7,2021 Page 7 addresses the City's land use plans and implementing ordinances and their potentially significant impacts on the environment. Sincerely, Elizabeth Klebaner Nossaman LLP LK: Attach (Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2) 58134597.v2 EXHIBIT " 1 " Legend Existing Land Use(2008) Residential Very Low(0.1-2.0 du/ac) Low(2.1-4.0 du/ac) 111111111 Low Medium(4.1-8.0 du/ac) Medium(8.1-14.0 du/ac) Medium High(14.1-24.0 du/ac) Deer - Ea I High(24+du/ac) Canyo Etiwa San Mobile Home Park Can y Sevaine Commercial,Office,and Retail Canyon - \ ------------ --�-- '- Office County i', - �" � Canyon Imon I J *, I;� i w 9y9 CITY O F Retail,Shopping Center,Restaurant _ > _ � Automotive Commercial Services San ` . . " u =i w I SanAnton t " e J an " • •o p I I. y FONT A N A Hotel/Motel A Heights ,� Hillside Rd a�,e _ i ^� n ' t >> x I Commercial Entertainment/Recreation Hillside Rd z ' Y m m E I I Industrial 24TH ST ;\ J� ca�� t Wilson Ave °I� , °t �� Ison Ave e _ I___ Summit Ave Business Park N yj a' a a a , a ■ a' n 3 ,♦ Warehou se/Distributi ion 0° _ a N E - � o � m� cN"N � Light Industrial o` Banyan St o E\c N U Y Me . t - summit Ave 0 _ _ _ _ Heavy Industrial 11011 ♦• Aggregate Mining Lemon An Public Facilities and Quasi-Public 1 F.loth St i %=210 Fieewa Utilities 't/ ■- r ♦ Highland Ave a' t g1�'e Flood Control ��. ■■ '. €— ~ �" iI ��. Schools r z\ ■■jiL )� w " +' l ,yl Ir3�� `� ♦ ; Civic/Public Facilities CITY OF a � c �•J a; �'. _' sr�/Y r Rail Lines UPLAND ¢ yell " �: % U Open Space and Recreation +r � t 6th St ;�♦ ne Rd �- �' / l I, ,♦JJ►�/ Baseline Ave Open Space �` Te =: I_ "Mpg Rm-\ l . � / 1Sta ��' WI � I :� Conservation r �ilr4- � ' ♦�V w � ' ��_ ha I �� ae- , + :I �% Agriculture E� �� ' �� .11 �turchSt 1� �o�j� t xi m `.,' .r'� Golf Course sm '��'% :! ee 1' d_�� ' �`• -. T �� Recreation/Parks Private Recreation(HOA) Foothill Blvd '} 66 ■*�,�.'- j a Foothill Blvd Other ■ `��� ■_ ¢ � °'I t-••-• � Religious Institution $ '■!�� �/ p A a � j Convalescent Hospital/Assited Living °� tom^ Arrow Blvd � Vacant U �; ArIY,.�$Iq�-•, I _== Rancho Cucamonga City Boundary ��III'M1ML MORE Sphere of Influence -' Burlin Son Northern Santa Fe Railway - _ - q Northern nta le Rail g Metrolink ■� in ■ / > be u & I ' CITY OF s FONTANA eta ' + 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 W 4th St a San Bernardino Ave _ Miles eew d I Feel � ay a a' a a _II ; 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 CITY OF a a e > Y _ ONTARIO O ¢ W O N San Bernardi LFeoay m 0 2 N U N 2 a` 0 Existing Land Uses Exhibit 4. 10-2 Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update Source:City of Rancho Cucamonga 2001 C O N S U L T I N G R:/Projects/Hogle/J007/Graphics/EIR/ex4.10-2 ExLandUses.pdf 6 9 13 12 1 3 5 7 As a -— — ; cc :E 6 14 i !1' Jersay ;North nka Fe Railway link � ion i dk- L 16 r� �>y 2 4 8] - W 10 11 1. Goodyear Rubber Co of Southern Ca 7. Mission Foods Corp. 13. Tamco 2. Frito-Lay, Inc. 8. Costco 14. Southern California Edison 3. Mizkan America, Inc. 9. Schlosser Forgo Co. 15. Inland Empire Utl Agen, A Mun Water Dist. 4. Nci Group Inc., Dba, Metal Coaters Of Ca 10. Emd Specialty Materials, Llc Arlon Emd 16. Inland Empire Regional Composting 5. Steelscape, Inc. 11. Nong Shim America, Inc. 6. Soc-co Plastic Coating Co. 12. Parallel Products Map � m � ru�,ia rare�• c� N a ETIWANDA Hose Line Rd A L T A L O M A Base Line Rd a Baseline Ave W COstcO Base Line Rd r WdRed Hill Park v Ietravista Pkwy Qkwy Emd Specialty Materials, Llc ChurchS1 C b Victoria Gardens Miller Ave Arlon Emd s r N Frito Lay Mama Por Dios _Rancho _ L4J Goodyear Rubber a �`FQothititi���'a Cucamonga o W Foothill Blvd s a Haven City Market q Inland Empire Regional Arrow Route -� a y a x a Arrow Route ti A � � � .-,� o � � Composting n a m a 3 a m FtiwandafTri WhitiramAve �� sthst EHthSt EHthst ' D Generating Station©I Auto Club Speedway Inland Empire Utl Agen,A Mun 9 - Q, Water Dist m 90 Wd Mission Foods Corporation n 6th st 5th St LQJ Mizkan America, Inc W 4 3 E Ath St Fourth St a San Bernardino Ave Nci Group Inc., Dba, Metal z Cucamonga-Guasti w C% Ontario Mills 4 Coaters Of Ca ,aF Regional Park n .sir Valley Blvd, mpire Blvd L Nong Shim America, Inc Fhin J Travel C. Ontario �f y g_—�= L9J Parallel Products International E Airport Dr Slnver Ave LQ Schlosser Forge Company Airport LVJ Soc-co Plastic Coating Co y LiOj Southern California Edison 9J Steelscape, Inc y 11 1ssi-11 E Jurupa St E Jurupa at a Tamco Ontario International Airport EXHIBIT " 2 " 7/6/2021 Facility Search Results Us California FACILITY SEARCH RESULTS Your Search Criteria: Database year is 2019. City is rancho cucamonga. Sorted by Facility Name (A to Z). 16 records returned. Download this data as a Comma Separated Value text file. TOG ROG CO NOx SOx PM PM10 Fac ID District Facility Name City Tons/yr Tons/yr Tons/yr Tons/yr Tons/yr Tons/yr Tons/ 1❑ 129437 S.Coast AQMD ICostco Wholesale 21 IS.Coast AQMD ILmd Specialty Ma Rancho C 2.1 1.8 �1 0.8 �0 0.1 0.1 346 S.Coast AQMD Frito-lay.,Inc. Rancho C 3.7 2.4 2.9 10.3 �0 9.4 9.3 L�`' 135274 S.Coast AQMD lGooftar Rubber Rancho C 4.1 ®��0 �0 0.3 0.2 L� l 139808 S.Coast AQMD llnland Empire Re Rancho C 8.1 6.7 �0 0.1 �0 �0 0 79174 S.Coast AQMD llnland Empire Ut 0 IS.Coast AQMD IMission Foods Co Rancho C 9.9 8.3 13 7.5 0.1 0 2.4 F8 1 I S.Coast AQMD IMizkan America, Rancho C 14.1 11.6 2.3 0� 2.6 0 IS.Coast AQMD Nci Group Inc., Rancho C 75.6 31.8 4.8 12.7 0.1 0.8 0.8 10 IS.Coast AQMD ItLong Shim Americ Rancho C 7.3 2.2 4.6 0 0.1 2.6 2.3 11 I S.Coast AQMD IParallel Product Rancho C 0.8 0.3 0 1.3 �0 13.9 9.8 12 IS.Coast AQMD Schlosser Forge Rancho C 9.8 6.2 9.5 29.4 0.2 5.3 4.6 13 IS.Coast AQMD I Soc-co Plastic C Rancho C 1.7 1.7 0.1 0.1 �0 1.6 1.5 14 IS.Coast AQMD I Southern Califor Rancho C 1.6 0.1 0.6 0.6 �0 0.5 0.5 15 IS.Coast AQMD Steelscape,Inc Rancho C 8.4 3.3 7.7 28.2 0.1 1.4 1.4 ME9EIS.Coast AQMD Tamco Rancho C 14.9 12.2 68 89.8 33.4 17.5 14.4 [Start a new search] Please call us regarding errors at : (916)323-2664 ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/faccrit.php?dd=&grp=1&sort=FaciIityNameA&dbyr=2019&ab=&dis=&co=&fname_=&city_=rancho+cuca... 1/1 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us V C,IC01TIE.-, Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Costco Wholesale#678 Facility ID : 129437 Street : 11820 4th St SIC Code :5399 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 Phone :(425) 313-8100 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Agmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : I https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=129437&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 6.1 Tons/Yr Download ROG 6.1 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 0 Tons/Yr NOX 0 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0 Tons/Yr PM 10 0 Tons/Yr PM2.5 0 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 57.4 Lbs/Yr Download Ethyl BenzeneE7 � I I 52.3 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=129437&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Emd Specialty Materials, Llc Arlon Emd Facility ID : 182102 Street :9433 Hyssop Dr SIC Code :3672 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 6107 Phone :(909) 987-9533 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=182102&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 2.1 Tons/Yr Download ROG 1.8 Tons/Yr CSV file CO Tons/Yr NOX 0.8 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0.1 Tons/Yr PM 10 0.1 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 0.111Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 0.3 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 0.6 Lbs/Yr CSV file INH3 2136.E Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o E7--]0]Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=182102&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Frito-lay, Inc. Facility ID :346 Street :9535 Archibald Ave SIC Code :5145 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 5737 Phone :(909) 941-6207 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=346&dis-SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 3.7 Tons/Yr Download ROG 2.4 Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 2.9 Tons/Yr NOX 10.3 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 9.4 Tons/Yr PM 10 9.3 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 9.3 11Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0.1 Lbs/Yr Download Arsenic 0 Lbs/Yr CSv file jBenzene 1.4 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 0 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI) 0 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 11 12.6 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 3.4 Lbs/Yr Lead 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 1098.5 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene11 0.1 Lbs/Yr Nickel 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=346&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Goodyear Rubber Co Of So California Facility ID :35274 Street :8833 Industrial Ln SIC Code :3069 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 4597 Phone :(909) 987-1774 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=35274&dis-SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 4.1 Tons/Yr Download ROG ®Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 0 Tons/Yr NOX 0 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0.3 Tons/Yr PM 10 0.2 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 0.211Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 0.1 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 0.1 Lbs/Yr CSV file INH3 117 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o E7--]0]Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=35274&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Inland Empire Regional Composting Author Facility ID : 139808 Street : 12645 Sixth St SIC Code : 1629 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91739 Phone :(909) 993-1639 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Agmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=139808&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 8.1 Tons/Yr Download ROG 6.7 Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 0 Tons/Yr NOX 0.1 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0 Tons/Yr PM 10 0 Tons/Yr PM2.5 110 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0.1 Lbs/Yr Download Arsenic 0 Lbs/Yr CSv file jBenzene 0.1 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 0 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI) 0 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 11 17.9 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 0.9 Lbs/Yr Lead 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 3843.5 Lbs/Yr N 11 01 Lbs/Yr Nickel 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=139808&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us V C,IC01TIE.-, Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Inland Empire Utl Agen, A Mun Water Dist Facility ID :79174 Street : 12811 6th St SIC Code :4941 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91739 Phone :(909) 993-1639 County_ :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : U https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=79174&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 2.8 Tons/Yr Download ROG Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 0 Tons/Yr NOX 0 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0 Tons/Yr PM 10 0 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 01 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,1,1-TCA 22.4 Lbs/Yr Download 1,3-Butadiene 13 Lbs/Yr CSv file 1 4-Dioxane 11 5.9 Lbs/Yr Arsenic 0 Lbs/Yr Benzene 76.4 Lbs/Yr CC14 43 Lbs/Yr CFC-113 7.8 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 0 Lbs/Yr Cron)- 0 Lbs/Yr DiC1DiFlmethane 6.7 Lbs/Yr DieselEXhPM 0.5 Lbs/Yr EDC 42.1 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 4.7 Lbs/Yr Lead 0 Lbs/Yr Methylene Chlor 1 78.8 Lbs/Yr NH3 426.5 Lbs/Yr N 11 OJILbs/Yr Nickel 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr Perc 1 13.7 Lbs/Yr TCE 80.4 Lbs/Yr TriClFluorMetha 152 Lbs/Yr Vinyl Chloride 40 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=79174&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=79174&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 3/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Mission Foods Corporation Facility ID : 104234 Street A 1559 Jersey Blvd SIC Code :2096 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 4924 Phone :(909) 980-3566 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=104234&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 9.9 Tons/Yr Download ROG 8.3 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 13 Tons/Yr NOX 7.5 Tons/Yr SOX 0.1 Tons/Yr PM �3 Tons/Yr PM 10 2.4 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 1.8 11Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 1.9 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 41ILbs/Yr CSV file INH3 4202.9 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0.1 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o E77—:::O Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=104234&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Mizkan America, Inc Facility ID :39855 Street : 10037 E 8th St SIC Code :5411 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 7008 Phone :(909) 989-4211 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : U https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=39855&dis-SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 14.1 Tons/Yr Download ROG 11.6 Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 2.3 Tons/Yr NOX 0 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 2.6 Tons/Yr PM 10 0 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 1.511Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0.3 Lbs/Yr Download Arsenic 0 Lbs/Yr CSV file jBenzene 0.7 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 0 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI) 0 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 11 43.3 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 3.1 Lbs/Yr Lead 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 704.7 Lbs/Yr N 11 01 Lbs/Yr Nickel 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o L 0.1 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=39855&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Nci Group Inc., Dba, Metal Coaters Of Ca Facility ID : 115563 Street :9123-33 Center Ave SIC Code :3448 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 Phone :(909) 987-4681 County_ :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : U https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=115563&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 75.6 Tons/Yr Download ROG 31.8 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 4.8 Tons/Yr NOX 12.7 Tons/Yr SOX 0.1 Tons/Yr PM 0.8 Tons/Yr PM 10 0.8 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 0.811Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 1.3 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 30.2 Lbs/Yr CSV file INH3 3690.4 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 1177.9 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=115563&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Nong Shim America, Inc Facility ID : 141473 Street : 12155 6th St SIC Code :5141 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 6115 Phone :(909) 243-8043 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=141473&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 7.3 Tons/Yr Download ROG 2.2 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 4.6 Tons/Yr NOX 0 Tons/Yr SOX 0.1 Tons/Yr PM 2.6 Tons/Yr PM 10 2.3 Tons/Yr PM2.5 IL 2.11 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene ®Lbs/Yr Download Benzene 10.8 Lbs/Yr CSV file ICC14 0.1 Lbs/Yr EDB 0.1 Lbs/Yr EDC 0.1 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 126.8 Lbs/Yr Methylene Chlor I1.9 Lbs/Yr NH3 1716.E Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0.6 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr Vinyl Chloride 0 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM 10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=141473&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Parallel Products Facility ID :50300 Street : 12281 Arrow Route SIC Code :2869 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91739 9601 Phone :(909) 980-1200 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=50300&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 0.8 Tons/Yr Download ROG 0.3 Tons/Yr CSV file CO Tons/Yr NOX 1.3 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 13.9 Tons/Yr PM 10 9.8 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11©Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 0.8 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 1.7 Lbs/Yr CSV file INH3 1791.E Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o E7--]0]Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=50300&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Schlosser Forge Company Facility ID : 15504 Street : 11711 Arrow Route SIC Code :3463 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 4998 Phone :(909) 483-2230 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk 2002 9.5 >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index 2002 1.11 >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index 2002 1.59 1>1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : B https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=15504&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 9.8 Tons/Yr Download ROG 6.2 Tons/Yr CSV file CO 9.5 Tons/Yr NOX 29.4 Tons/Yr SOX 0.2 Tons/Yr PM 5.3 Tons/Yr PM 10 4.6 Tons/Yr PM2.5 IL 4.11 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0.7 Lbs/Yr Download 2MeNaphthalene 11 OJILbs/Yr CSV file jAcenaphthene 0 Lbs/Yr Acenaphthylene 0 Lbs/Yr Arsenic 0.6 Lbs/Yr B[b]fluoranthen 0 Lbs/Yr B[&yrene 11 0 Lbs/Yr B[9,h,i]perylen 11 01 Lbs/Yr Benzene �5 Lbs/Yr Beryllium 0.2 Lbs/Yr CC14 0 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 1.1 Lbs/Yr Chrysene 0 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI) 11 0.1 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 11 105.6 Lbs/Yr EDB 0 Lbs/Yr EDC 0 Lbs/Yr Fluoranthene 0 Lbs/Yr Fluorene 0 Lbs/Yr Fluorocarb(Cl). 11 2.5 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 15.5 Lbs/Yr Lead 1.1 Lbs/Yr Methylene Chlor 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 1834.E Lbs/Yr Naphthalene11 0.3 Lbs/Yr Nickel 16.8 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0.2 Lbs/Yr Phenanthrene 0 Lbs/Yr Pyrene 1 Lbs/Yr Vinyl Chloride 0 Lbs/Yr https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=15504&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM 10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=15504&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 3/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Soc-co Plastic Coating Co Facility ID : 1334 Street : 11251 Jersey Blvd SIC Code :3479 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 5197 Phone :(909) 987-4753 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=1334&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 1.7 Tons/Yr Download ROG 1.7 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 0.1 Tons/Yr NOX 0.1 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 1.6 Tons/Yr PM 10 1.5 Tons/Yr PM2.5 11 1.411Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS Benzene 0 Lbs/Yr Download Formaldehyde 11 OJILbs/Yr CSV file INH3 37.1 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o ��Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=1334&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/2 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Southern California Edison Facility ID : 149620 Street : 12408 6th St SIC Code :4911 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91739 Phone :(909)478-1771 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : U https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=149620&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 1.6 Tons/Yr Download ROG 0.1 Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 0.6 Tons/Yr NOX 0.6 Tons/Yr SOX 0 Tons/Yr PM 0.5 Tons/Yr PM 10 0.5 Tons/Yr PM2.5 IL 0.5 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0 Lbs/Yr Download 12MeNgpithalene 11 OJILbs/Yr CSv file jAcenaphthene 0 Lbs/Yr Acenaphthylene 0 Lbs/Yr B[b]fluoranthen 0 Lbs/Yr B[.&yrene 11 Lbs/Yr B[g,h,i]perylen 0 Lbs/Yr Benzene 1.1 Lbs/Yr CC14 0 Lbs/Yr Chrysene 0 Lbs/Yr EDB 0 Lbs/Yr EDC 0 Lbs/Yr Fluoranthene 0 Lbs/Yr Fluorene 0 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 66.4 Lbs/Yr Methylene Chlor 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 291.5 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 11 0.1 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0.1 Lbs/Yr Phenanthrene 0 Lbs/Yr Pyrene 11 OJILbs/Yr Vinyl Chloride 0 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district.Note: If this facility has https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=149620&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) diesel-fueled internal combustion engines, then a portion of the PM10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=149620&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 3/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Steelscape, Inc Facility ID : 126498 Street : 11200 Arrow Route SIC Code :3479 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91730 4899 Phone :(909) 484-4659 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : U https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=126498&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 1/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 8.4 Tons/Yr Download ROG 3.3 Tons/Yr CSv file 1CO 7.7 Tons/Yr NOX 28.2 Tons/Yr SOX 0.1 Tons/Yr PM 1.4 Tons/Yr PM 10 1.4 Tons/Yr PM2.5 IL 1.4 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,3-Butadiene 0.1 Lbs/Yr Download Acetaldehyde 1.4 Lbs/Yr CSv file jAcrolein 0 Lbs/Yr Arsenic 0 Lbs/Yr Benzene 29.6 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 0 Lbs/Yr Copper 11 0 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI) 10 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 8.8 Lbs/Yr DimethylPhthala 1.6 Lbs/Yr Ethyl Benzene 1 3.7 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 12.5 Lbs/Yr Glycol Ethers 11 94.8 Lbs/Yr HCl 0 Lbs/Yr Hexane 1.8 Lbs/Yr Lead 0 Lbs/Yr MEK 0.8 Lbs/Yr MIBK 0.2 Lbs/Yr Manganese 0 Lbs/Yr Mercury_ 0 Lbs/Yr NH3 6846.8 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 11 87.8 Lbs/Yr Nickel 0 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0 Lbs/Yr Selenium 0 Lbs/Yr Toluene 11.3 Lbs/Yr Xylenes L 14.3 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=126498&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates,please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab_=SC&facid_=126498&dis_=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 3/3 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) California Home Search Site Map Links Software Contact Us Io California- FACILITY DETAILS Facility Information Facility Name :Tamco Facility ID : 18931 Street : 12459-b Arrow Route SIC Code :3449 City :Rancho Cucamonga Zip :91739 9601 Phone :(909) 646-7822 County :San Bernardino Air Basin :South Coast District :South Coast Aqmd District Facility Prioritization Inventory Above Prioritization Year High Threshold Threshold? High Low Cancer Prioritization 10 1 Chronic Prioritization 10 1 Acute Prioritization 10 1 Prioritization scores determine whether a facility must conduct a risk assessment for the "Hot Spots"program. The scores themselves are not an accurate measurement of facility risk. District District Health Risk Assessment Inventory Notification RRAP Year Value Level Level Cancer Risk 2016 8.7 >=10 25 Chronic Hazard Index 2016 .61 >1; lead THI>.5 3 Acute Hazard Index 2016 .49 >1; lead THI>.5 3 The facility health risk assessment(HRA) and prioritization score data were collected under the Air Toxic 'Hot Spots'Program. The risk data, submitted to the ARB, may not have been derived from the same toxic emission data that was reported to CEIDARS. Because the facility may have taken action to reduce risks pursuant to the risk assessment, the risk from the facility may have been substantially reduced since the risk assessment was conducted. To determine if more recent data is available,please contact the district. Program Status : C https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=18931&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 114 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) Emissions Data Pollutant Emissions Unit Data from 2019 ITOG 14.9 Tons/Yr Download ROG 12.2 Tons/Yr CSV file 1CO 68 Tons/Yr NOX 89.8 Tons/Yr SOX 33.4 Tons/Yr PM 17.5 Tons/Yr PM 10 14.4 Tons/Yr PM2.5 10.7 Tons/Yr TOXIC DATA MAY COME FROM VARIOUS YEARS 1,1,2TriClEthan I0 Lbs/Yr Download 1,2,4TriMeBenze 15 Lbs/Yr CSV file 1 2-DiClPropane 11 OJILbs/Yr 1,3-Butadiene 11 3.4 Lbs/Yr 1,3-DiClPropene 11 01ILbsiYr 1=33,6-8HxCDD 11 ( Lbs/Yr IL33,6-8HxCDF 11 0 Lbs/Yr 1_3,7,8PeCDD 0 Lbs/Yr 1=33,2,8PeCDF 0 Lbs/Yr 1=33,7-9HxCDD 11 0 Lbs/Yr IL33,7-9HxCDF 11 0 Lbs/Yr 1=44,6-8HpCDD 11 01 Lbs/Yr 1=44,6-ft DF 0 Lbs/Yr 1=4,7 8HxCDD 11 0 Lbs/Yr 1=44,1,8HxCDF 10 Lbs/Yr 1=4,7-9HpL— I Lbs/Yr 1-80ctaCDD 0 Lbs/Yr 1-80ctaCDF 0 Lbs/Yr 2,3,1,8-TCDD 10 Lbs/Yr 2,2,2,8-TCDF 0 Lbs/Yr 2=44,6-8HxCDF I 0 Lbs/Yr 2=4,7 8PeCDF I 10 Lbs/Yr 2MeNaphthalene I 10 Lbs/Yr Acenaphthene 0 Lbs/Yr Acenaphthylene 0 Lbs/Yr Acetaldehyde 4.6 Lbs/Yr Acrolein 1.7 Lbs/Yr Anthracene 0 Lbs/Yr Arsenic 5.8 Lbs/Yr AIP 11 0 Lbs/Yr https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=1893l&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 2/4 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) IB[a]anthracene II 0I Lbs/Yr B[b]fluoranthen 11 01 Lbs/Yr B[e]pyrene 10 Lbs/Yr B[g,h jpgrylen 11 0 Lbs/Yr B[k]fluoranthen 11 01 Lbs/Yr Benzene 15.5 Lbs/Yr Beryllium 4.9 Lbs/Yr CC14 0 Lbs/Yr Cadmium 5.7 Lbs/Yr Chlorine 1.6 Lbs/Yr Chloroform 0 Lbs/Yr Chrysene 0 Lbs/Yr Copper 1 40.5 Lbs/Yr Cr(VI). 11 6.6 Lbs/Yr DieselExhPM 24 Lbs/Yr EDB 0 Lbs/Yr EDC 0 Lbs/Yr Ethyl Benzene ®Lbs/Yr Fluoranthene 0 Lbs/Yr Fluorene 0 Lbs/Yr Fluorocarb(Cl). 11 150 Lbs/Yr Formaldehyde 11 70.5 Lbs/Yr HCl 11 0.1 Lbs/Yr Hexane 6.5 Lbs/Yr In[1,2,3-cd]pyr 11 01 Lbs/Yr Lead 70.8 Lbs/Yr MEK 0.2 Lbs/Yr Manganese I42.6 Lbs/Yr Me t-ButylEther I7.3 Lbs/Yr Mercury_ 38 Lbs/Yr Methanol 2.8 Lbs/Yr Methylene Chlor IO Lbs/Yr NH3 1989.4 Lbs/Yr Naphthalene 11 0.7 Lbs/Yr Nickel 9.6 Lbs/Yr PAHs-w/o 0.1 Lbs/Yr Perylene 0 Lbs/Yr Phenanthrene 0 Lbs/Yr Phosphorus 120.5 Lbs/Yr Pyrene 11 O,Lbs/Yr Selenium 4.3 Lbs/Yr Styrene 0.5 Lbs/Yr https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=18931&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 3/4 7/6/2021 Facility Detail Risk Selection(ARB) ITetraClEthane I1 0 Lbs/Yr Toluene 34.8 Lbs/Yr Vinyl Chloride 10 Lbs/Yr Xylenes ©Lbs/Yr m-Xylene 17.5 Lbs/Yr o=XXylene 6.1 Lbs/Yr The emission inventory data provided here may have been developed over several years and is the most recent information available at ARB for this inventory year. Many facilities are only required to update their toxic emission data if there has been an increase in emissions. Therefore, the toxic emission data presented here should generally be viewed as maximum emission values which may have decreased since this information was reported. If you have questions regarding data updates, please contact the local air district. Note: If this facility has diesel-fueled internal combustion engines,then a portion of the PM 10 shown is considered to be diesel exhaust PM10. [Start a new search] ARB Homepage A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency https://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facdet.php?co-36&ab=SC&facid=1893l&dis=SC&dbyr=2019&dd= 4/4 �--r C N 2z � N � o Za Q � � � � � �� ��ti U �' ���� � �� � � � L �--� RANCHO CUCAMONGA nd December 2020 IndustriaA Mora�ium RANCHO CUCAMONGA nd December 2020 IndustriaA Mora�ium April 2021 rpm"' Public Draft Code RANCHO CUCAMONGA nd December May 2021 2020 Planning Industria mmissio Moratorium ea n ng April 2021 Public Draft Code RANCHO nd CUCAMONGA December May 2021 2020 Planning Industria mmissio Moratorium Ba ri ng April 2021 � June 2021 OppPublic Draft City Council Code Hearing IF,* Pro Moratorium Expired RANCHO Summar of Topl* cs CUCAMONGA y • Impacts to existing uses and projects under construction • Newly prohibited industrial uses • Renewable power generation • General Plan consistency • Environmental analysis • Emergent issues RANCHO Existin Industrial Uses �f CUCAMONGA g • How does this change impact existing businesses • Development Code Chapter 17 . 62 — Non - conforming Uses and Structures —Allows an existing , lawful use to continue even if regulations change unless enlarged , extended or discontinued —Permitted uses now subject to CUP/MUP can continue without new permits —Section 20 of the ordinance reiterates these regulations RANCHO CUCAMONGA Industrial Buildings Under Construction • How does this change impact buildings under construction • Ordinance Section 20 —Allows projects under construction 180 days to complete construction and secure tenants —Business license must be obtained before mid - February 2022 • All projects under construction after 2/2022 will be required to obtain necessary use permits RANCHO Section 20 Update CUCAMONGA • Ordinance Section 20 recommended to be deleted — Redundant to Chapter 17 . 62 — Provision is used regularly as the code is updated • Manufacturing uses • Gas Stations • Bars —Allows city to bring uses into conformance over time —Address single user concern which after review they deemed insufficiently addressed their concerns . RANCHO prohibited Industrial Uses �f CUCAMONGA • Limited available land left in City • Parking is most efficient when on site with primary use • Offsite parking lots and truck yards — Increase in VIVIT — Increased GHG emissions —Continued wear and tear on public infrastructure • High impact/low benefit use RANCHO prohibited Industrial Uses �f CUCAMONGA • Evaluated high impact/low benefit uses —Truck Yards —Parking Facilities —Heavy Manufacturing —Fuel Storage and Distribution —Auto Vehicle Dismantling —Scrap Recycling RANCHO Onsite Renewable Ener Generation �f CUCAMONGA g y • Continued concerns about energy generation —Not all generated energy will be used day 1 —Excess energy generated but not used • Proposed revisions —Power generation phasing plan with thresholds and triggers based on usage —Calculated usage could be reduced or delayed if excess cannot be accepted by power utility RANCHO Relationshl* Pto General Plan CUCAMONGA • Industrial code is a separate planning effort from the General Plan —Result of industrial moratorium , December 2020 —Directed by Council to update standards —Evaluated for consistency with the current General Plan • General Plan Update is still in progress — Initiated in January 2020 —Public draft available —Hearing and adoption scheduled for Winter 2022 RANCHO f CUCAMONGA I Impact to Projects in Process • Estimated effective date - mid -August , 2-90 ,91 • Development Code Section 17 . 02 . 020 ( F ) —Pending application , deemed complete • Not affected by new development standards —Pending application not complete * Subject to new code standards RANCHO Environm ental Analysis CUCAMONGA • CEQA Exemption , Section 1506 1 ku ) (3 ) • Modifies development review procedures • Prohibits or requires enhanced discretionary review of high - impact uses • Adopts new development standards for industrial uses to mitigate impacts and improve efficiency RANCHO Environm ental Analsis �f CUCAMONGA y • 3,d party review/analysis by PlaceWorks • Reviewed against 20 topical areas covered by CEQA • Greater limitations to industrial development • Additional oversite with enhanced discretionary review • Beneficial compared to current development code standards RANCHO Environm ental Analsis �f CUCAMONGA y • Comments received 7/6/21 from Phelan / Translutions • Context and comment provided by City Engineer —Basis for supplied analysis —City of choice effect on regional/national VIVIT — Impact of calculated metrics —Effect of LOS on CEQA RANCHO Emergent Issue CUCAMONGA • Emergency Shelter —Currently conditionally permitted in GI ( NI ) zoning district — Inadvertently changed to not permitted —Staff recommends reverting to conditionally permitted use RANCHO Recommendation �f CUCAMONGA Introduce Ordinance 982 , waive full reading and read by title only : An Ordinance Of The City Of Rancho Cucamonga, Amending Title 17of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code To Modify Administrative Procedures within the Development Code And Establish New Zoning Districts, Amend Land Uses And Definitions And Create New Development Standards For Industrial Development Within The City, Making Findings In Support Thereof, And Making A Determination That The Ordinance is Exempt From The California Environmental Quality Act."' i RANCHO CUCAMONGA Questions